alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
23.1.  Consent of Independent Public Accounting Firm








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-18557, No. 033-60113, No. 333-18543,
No. 333-120242, No. 333-36693) and Form S-3D (No. 333-20683) of
Capital City Bank Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2008, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Capital City Bank Group, Inc. and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Capital City
Bank Group, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2007.








/s/ Ernst
& Young, LLP





Birmingham,
Alabama


March 13,
2008
#### Joe Allen ROBERTS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28577.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 13, 1957.

Jack Q. Neal, Graham, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The former opinion delivered herein is withdrawn, and the following is substituted in lieu thereof:

The offense is the driving of a motor vehicle while intoxicated upon a public highway; the punishment assessed, three days in jail and a fine of $50.

Highway patrolmen testified that they apprehended appellant driving his automobile upon a public highway and that he was intoxicated at the time. Apellant was arrested and carried to jail. The sheriff, who observed him at the time, testified that he was then intoxicated.

A quart of wine in a half-gallon container was found in the automobile at the time of arrest.

Appellant denied that he was intoxicated. He admitted having taken three or four drinks of the wine while traveling from Odessa to Albany but, in that connection, he stated that “he was not too much of a drinking man.”

The issue of intoxication was closely contested under the facts.

A bill of exception reflects that upon cross-examination of appellant state’s counsel propounded to him the following question:

> “Is it not a fact that you were arrested and plead guilty on this last Saturday night to a charge of being drunk in Stephens County, Texas and paid a fine therefor?”

Appellant’s objection to the asking of the question was that it was highly prejudicial and related to an extraneous offense not in any manner connected with the case.

The question was not answered and the jury were instructed not to consider the question for any purpose.

The qualification to the bill of exception shows that the question was asked for the *600purpose of impeaching- the credibility of the appellant as a witness.

The question propounded, as well as the answer sought to be elicited thereby, was not admissible for any purpose. Gonzales v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 108, 261 S.W.2d 577; Lovett v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 550, 258 S.W.2d 335; McDaniel v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 126, 239 S.W.2d 630.

It must be remembered that appellant had not testified that he was a total abstainer of intoxicants or that he had never been intoxicated; he merely testified that “he was not too much of a drinking man.” This testimony would not authorize the state to prove that appellant had been theretofore convicted of drunkenness.

In view of another trial, the opinion is expressed that the testimony as to the alcoholic properties of other intoxicants and the inferences to be drawn therefrom should not be admitted in evidence.

For the error discussed, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAIME FABIAN MEZA-RIVAS, AKA

Jaime Mezarivais, AKA Jaime Fabian

Mezarivas, AKA Jaime F. Mezrevias,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 15-71882

Agency No. A205-297-149

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 18, 2017** 

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Jaime Fabian Meza-Rivas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying a continuance and entering an order of

FILED

JAN 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the denial of a continuance and review de novo due process claims. 

Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the

petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion or violate due process by denying

Meza-Rivas’ motion for a continuance for lack of good cause, where Meza-Rivas

had the opportunity to research and incorporate recent developments regarding

social group claims, and future changes in the law remained speculative. See 8

C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause);

Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009) (considering the nature of

the evidence excluded and the reasonableness of petitioner’s conduct); Singh v.

Holder, 638 F.3d 1264, 1274 (9th Cir. 2011) (“[T]he IJ [is] not required to grant a

continuance based on . . . speculations.”); Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th

Cir. 2000).

Meza-Rivas’ motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 20) and

supplemental motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 22) are denied as

moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

2 15-71882
Exhibit 32.1

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2006 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher M. Condron, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Christopher M. Condron
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Christopher M. Condron
                                  Chairman of the Board,
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 15, 2007
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Computer Software Innovations, Inc.
(the Company), each certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Nancy K. Hedrick   
| |  | Nancy K. Hedrick       
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
| |  | Date: May 13, 2008     
| | 
| |  | /s/ David B. Dechant   
| |  | David B. Dechant       
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
| |  | Date: May 13, 2008
### Open Literature Review Screen Chemical Name: Atrazine 

### CAS No: 1912-24-9 

### Citation: Gustavson, K, F. Mohlenberg, et al. (2003). "Effects ofexposure duration of herbicides on natural stream periphyton communities and recovery." Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 45(1): 48-58. (ECOTOX #071668). 

### ( MfZl0 

# ttb2. b

# u (9-) Date ofScreen: 08/24/09 

### Rationale for Not Conducting aFull Open Literature Review Summary: The study evaluates a series offour herbicides as the active ingredients which does not include atrazine; data on atrazine as an active ingredient are notprovided. The study involved only metribuzin (a triazine), hexazinone, isoproturon and pendimethalin. 

### Primary Reviewer: Lisa Muto, StaffScientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc. 

### Secondary Reviewer: Teri Myers, Senior Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.



# 1.111111•• 2087850
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1752 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to promulgate regulations requiring a label to be displayed on the packaging of certain 

baby monitors to warn that the signals of such monitors may be intercepted by potential intruders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2011 

Mr. CROWLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to promulgate regulations requiring a label to be displayed 

on the packaging of certain baby monitors to warn that 

the signals of such monitors may be intercepted by potential intruders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Children Safe 

5 Act of 2011’’. 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1752 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINDING. 

2 Congress finds that parents deserve to know that the 

3 signals of analog baby monitors may be intercepted by po4 tential intruders. 

5 SEC. 3. FCC REGULATIONS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Commu8 nications Commission shall promulgate regulations requir9 ing the warning label described in subsection (b) to be dis10 played on the packaging of a baby monitor. 

11 (b) WARNING LABEL DESCRIBED.—The warning 

12 label described in this subsection is the following: 

13 (1) In the case of a baby monitor that trans14 mits video and audio, a label that reads as follows: 

15 ‘‘WARNING: WHAT YOU SEE, THEY CAN SEE. 

16 Images and sounds captured by this device may be 

17 easily viewed or heard by potential intruders outside 

18 your home.’’. 

19 (2) In the case of a baby monitor that trans20 mits only audio, a label that reads as follows: 

21 ‘‘WARNING: WHAT YOU HEAR, THEY CAN 

22 HEAR. Sounds captured by this device may be eas23 ily heard by potential intruders outside your home.’’. 

24 (c) BABY MONITOR DEFINED.—In this Act, the term 

25 ‘‘baby monitor’’ means any set of devices that— 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1752 IH

1 (1) consists of one or more analog transmitting 

2 devices that wirelessly transmit images or sounds to 

3 one or more receiving devices; 

4 (2) allows an individual to see images of or hear 

5 sounds made by another individual from a short dis6 tance within or around a residence; and 

7 (3) is designed for use by an individual to mon8 itor a child in the care of such individual in a resi9 dential setting. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 23, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 189 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-190, CP2024-196.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-03656 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Transition Report of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-K for the six months ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Craig A. Tooman, Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

March 3, 2006
                                         /s/Craig A. Tooman
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Craig A. Tooman
                                         Executive Vice President, Finance and
                                         Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and will be furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.









                                      E-38
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1800 

To temporarily extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 relating to access to business 

records and roving wiretaps and to permanently extend expiring provisions of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 

relating to individual terrorists as agents of foreign powers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 6, 2011 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. ROGERS of 

Michigan, and Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and 

in addition to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To temporarily extend expiring provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 

relating to access to business records and roving wiretaps 

and to permanently extend expiring provisions of the 

Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 

2004 relating to individual terrorists as agents of foreign 

powers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1800 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FISA Sunsets Reau3 thorization Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSETS OF PROVISIONS RELATING 

5 TO ACCESS TO BUSINESS RECORDS, INDI6 VIDUAL TERRORISTS AS AGENTS OF FOR7 EIGN POWERS, AND ROVING WIRETAPS. 

8 (a) TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF PROVISIONS RELAT9 ING TO ACCESS TO BUSINESS RECORDS AND ROVING

10 WIRETAPS.—Section 102(b)(1) of the USA PATRIOT 

11 Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005 (Public 

12 Law 109–177; 50 U.S.C. 1805 note, 50 U.S.C. 1861 note, 

13 and 50 U.S.C. 1862 note) is amended by striking ‘‘May 

14 27, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2017’’. 

15 (b) PERMANENT EXTENSION OF PROVISION RELAT16 ING TO INDIVIDUAL TERRORISTS AS AGENTS OF FOREIGN

17 POWERS.—Section 6001 of the Intelligence Reform and 

18 Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–458; 

19 118 Stat. 3742; 50 U.S.C. 1801 note) is amended— 

20 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘(a) IN GEN21 ERAL.—Section’’ and inserting ‘‘Section’’; and 

22 (2) by striking subsection (b). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GenaissancePharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Ben Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |                   | /s/ Ben Kaplan          |   |
|--------|------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date:  | November 14, 2003 | Ben Kaplan              |
|   |                   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Milton "Todd" Ault, III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Digicorp;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

      (a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's  disclosure
controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)  disclosed  in this report any change in the small  business  issuer's
internal  control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or persons  performing  the
equivalent functions);

      (a) all significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

September 28, 2005


/s/ Milton "Todd" Ault, III
---------------------------
    Milton "Todd" Ault, III
    Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 16, 2021

No. 04-20-00543-CR

Lavelle SIMPSON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR10237

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s 

brief is due on or before May 3, 2021.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of April, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court