alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Raul S. McQuivey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Sutron Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this annual report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures
based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrant
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design
or operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for
the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal controls; and

6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have
indicated in this annual report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  March 30, 2004
By /s/ Raul S. McQuivey 		Raul S. McQuviey, Chairman of
						the Board of Directors
						and President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7263

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CRYSTAL MARIE PATE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:17-cr-00346-D-3)

Submitted: March 21, 2023 Decided: March 24, 2023

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Crystal Marie Pate, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7263 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Crystal Marie Pate appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release. Upon review, we discern no abuse 

of discretion in the district court’s determination that, under the pertinent 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors, compassionate release was not warranted. See United States 

v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329-31 (4th Cir.) (providing standard of review and outlining steps 

for evaluating compassionate release motions), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). 

Accordingly, we deny Pate’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the district court’s order. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7263 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
### I)0r-O^T'2JOOB

- f^/2 © DELT A COUNT Y BOAR D O F COMMISSIONER S ADMINISTRATIO N OFFIC E 31 0 LUDINGTO N STREE T ESCANABA , MICHIGA N 4982 9 PHONE : 906-789-510 0 FAX : 906-789-519 7

O Apri l 8,201 0 > ^"^ 3 C D Denni s J . DeVan y Chief , Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Division , X-5 3 Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Roo m640 1 40 0 Seventh Street , S.W . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dear Mr . DeVany : Thi s communicatio n i s regardin g th e Essentia l Ai r Servic e t o th e Delt aCount y Airport locate din Escanab aan dallowin g u s th e opportunit y t o comment . Th e Delt aCount y Boar do f Commissioner s a

t thei r regula r meetin g hel dApri l 6 , 201 0 reviewe dth e bi doffer s for th e Delt aCount y Airport mad e b y four

bidders . Th e Boar dmove dt o support th e bi doptio n # 3 fromMesab ad/b/ aDelt aConnection . I n choosin g t o suppor t th e optio n 3 bid , th e boardi s considerin g consistenc y an d continuit y for ou r community , a s wel l a s th e recor d Delt aConnectio n ha s i n increasin g local passenge r boarding s an dthei r

o n time/cancellatio n performance . Th e Boar dfeel s throug h Delt aConnectio n service s t o Detroi t an dMinneapoli s th e resident s o f

Delt aCount y wil l enjo y acces s t o an establishe dai r provider . Than k yo u fo r you r attentio n t o thi s matter .

Sincerel y your^ . Thoma s C . Elegeert , Chairma n Delt aCount y Boar do f

Commissioner s

Delt a Count y i s a n equa l opportunit y provide ran d employe r
#### Joseph Harry MAHAN, Appellant, v. M. W. THOMAS, Warden State Penitentiary, Eddyville, Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 13, 1957.

Joseph Harry Mahan, pro se.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., John B. Browning, Asst. Atty. Gen., F. B. Martin, Commonwealth’s Atty. for Graves County, Mayfield, for appellee.

MILLIKEN, Judge.

Joseph Harry Mahan, who is imprisoned in the state penitentiary at Eddyville, filed a habeas corpus proceeding asserting that his judgment of conviction was void, and upon the refusal of the trial court to grant the relief sought he has appealed- here. Mahan was convicted on 'the charge of armed assault with intent to rob, and his conviction was affirmed by this court in Mahan v. Commonwealth, Ky., 286 S.W.2d 93.

We have examined the indictment and the judgment of conviction, and find nothing irregular about them.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

JOHN CHURCHMAN SMITH, JR. :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2363 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 193 DB 2016

Attorney Registration No. 58234

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of January , 2019, on certification by the Disciplinary

Board that John Churchman Smith, Jr., who was suspended on consent for a period of

one year, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with the Order of

S uspension and Pa.R.D.E. 217, John Churchman Smith, Jr. is reinstated to active

status.
Exhibit 3 (b)

                           ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                     TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                    OF
                          INTERPHASE CORPORATION


       Pursuant to the provisions of Article  4.04 of the Texas  Business

  Corporation Act,  Interphase  Corporation,  a  Texas  corporation  (the

  "Corporation"), hereby adopts  the following Articles  of Amendment  to

  its Articles of Incorporation to establish  a par value for each  share

  of Common Stock of the Corporation.



       ARTICLE  ONE.    The  name   of  the  Corporation  is   Interphase
  Corporation.

       ARTICLE  TWO.    The  following  amendment  to  the  Articles   of
  Incorporation  was adopted by  the  shareholders of the  Corporation on
  May 3, 2000:

       Article IV of the Articles of  Incorporation is hereby amended  to
       read in its entirety as follows:

                                "ARTICLE IV

            The  aggregate   number   of   shares   which   the
            corporation shall have  the authority  to issue  is
            one hundred million (100,000,000) consisting of one
            hundred million shares of Common Stock with the par
            value of $.10 per share.

            At  each  meeting  of   the  shareholders  of   the
            corporation, each holder of record of shares of the
            Common Stock  of  the  corporation,  who  was  such
            holder on the date fixed by the Board of  Directors
            as the record date for determining persons entitled
            to vote at such meeting,  shall be entitled to  one
            vote, to be cast  in person or  by proxy, for  each
            share of Common  Stock held by  him on such  record
            date."


       ARTICLE THREE.  The  number  of shares  of  Common  Stock  of  the
  Corporation outstanding and entitled to vote was____________at the time
  of the adoption of this amendment.

       ARTICLE FOUR.   The number  of  shares  voted  FOR  the  amendment
  was,_____________ the  number of  shares  voted  AGAINST the  amendment
  was,_____________ and the number of shares  ABSTAINING was ___________.

<PAGE>
       ARTICLE FIVE.  Upon issuance of the Certificate of Amendment, each
  share of the issued and outstanding Common Stock, no par value, of  the
  Corporation held by  each and every  shareholder will be  automatically
  and without  further action  converted into  one  (1) share  of  Common
  Stock, $.10 par value, of the Corporation.

       ARTICLE SIX.  Upon  issuance of the  Certificate of Amendment,  by
  virtue of the conversion of the Common Stock of the Corporation from no
  par value per share to $.10 par value per share, the stated capital  of
  the Corporation shall be changed from $_____________ to $_____________.

       DATED as of the _____ day of May, 2000.


                                INTERPHASE CORPORATION

                                By:
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Gregory B. Kalush, President
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of CH Lighting International Corporation
(the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      February 12, 2010
                By:
                /s/Zhao
      GuosongName:
                Zhao
      GuosongTitle:
                President,
      Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                  Executive
      Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to CH Lighting International Corporation will
be retained by CH Lighting International Corporation and furnished to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED, PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Jointland  Development,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Kexi
Xu, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November ____, 2007

/s/ Kexi Xu
---------------------
Kexi Xu,
Acting Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Crit BOWLING, Appellant, v. Lou BOWLING et al., Appellees. Crit BOWLING, Appellant, v. Sim BOWLING, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 4, 1955.

*838Calvert C. Little, Lewis & Weaver, London, for appellant.

J. Milton Luker, London, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

These cases were consolidated for the purpose of this appeal and involve two 1954 judgments. The value of the real estate involved is not stated in the record, but the land was bought for $800 in 1922 so we assume that its present value is less than $2,500. KRS 21.070. Appeals are no longer allowed as a matter of right in cases involving land. KRS 21.060. Although the trial court granted appeals in these cases, the orders were ineffective because appeals involving less than $2,500 can only be obtained on motion in this court. KRS 21.-080; Shely v. Votaw, Ky., 272 S.W.2d 462. However, proper motions were made in this court despite the fact that the Statements of Appeal declare that this consolidated appeal is not taken under KRS 21.080.

 One of the judgments appealed refused reformation of a 1927 deed which the appellant, grantee in the deed, never had recorded but which he pocketed until he filed the action in 1951 praying reformation of the deed. The other action sought to recover the same land on the basis of a 1927 deed from the appellees, Lou Bowling and her mother, Ann Bowling. They denied execution of the deed and pleaded that it was a forgery. This latter deed was recorded on the day it was executed and bore the certificate of a notary public as to its execution, but the appellees pleaded that they never executed it and that any signatures thereon were forgeries. They also pleaded limitations and estoppel.

We have examined and discussed the evidence and briefs of counsel, and conclude, in the attendant circumstances of this appeal, that the judgments are correct except as to the apparent oversight with respect to Crit Bowling’s purchase of a *Yss*interest in the land from one of the heirs of Marsh Bowling during the pendency of this action, and they should be corrected in that respect.

The motions for an appeal are overruled and the judgments are affirmed.'
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 129079 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129079 COA: 261812 Kent CC: 02-009413-FH ROBBIE WILLIAM WHITE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 19, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I,  Timothy  Rosen, Chief Executive Officer of VerticalBuyer, Inc. certify that:

     1.     I  have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended  March  31,  2002  of  VerticalBuyer,  Inc.

     2.     Based  on  my  knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue  statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to  make  the  statements  made,  in light of the circumstances under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly  report;

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.     The  registrant's  other certifying officers, and I, are responsible
for  establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  know  to  us  by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and  presented  in  this  quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  our  evaluation.

     c)  Disclosed  in this quarterly report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly  report  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is reasonably likely to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.     The  registrant's  other certifying officers, and I, have disclosed,
based  on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  functions):

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in  the design or operation of internal
controls  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect the registrant's
ability  to  record,  process,  summarize  and report financial information; and

     b)  Any  fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial  reporting.

Date:  July 9, 2004

                                                /s/ Timothy  Rosen
                                                -------------------------
                                                Timothy  Rosen
                                                Chief  Executive  Officer


                                        8
<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.1

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, William Kefalas, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Green Dolphin Systems
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact of
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the liability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report based on such evaluation; and

d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ William Kefalas

________________

William Kefalas

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  May 18, 2006
Exhibit 31.3


Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934


I, Kenneth J. Zagzebski, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.; and


2.    Based on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date:April 29, 2016/s/ Kenneth J. ZagzebskiKenneth J. ZagzebskiChief Executive Officer











1