```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61057-61059]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25284]

[[Page 61057]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0580; FRL-9468-2]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Sacramento 
Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, Ventura County Air 
Pollution Control District, and Placer County Air Pollution Control 
District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the 
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD), 
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD), and Placer 
County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) portion of the 
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern 
volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from organic chemical 
manufacturing, soil decontamination, and polyester resin operations. We 
are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under 
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective on December 2, 2011 without further 
notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by November 2, 2011. If we 
receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the 
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will 
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2011-0580, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow 
the on-line instructions.
    2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket 
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, 
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be 
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an 
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or 
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. 
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If 
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot 
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your 
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, 
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are 
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While 
all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov, 
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy 
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be 
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard 
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business 
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Grounds, EPA Region IX, (415) 
972-3019, grounds.david@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,'' 
and ``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules
    D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they 
were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the California 
Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Local agency                  Rule No.              Rule title              Adopted     Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMAQMD..................................          464  Organic Chemical Manufacturing      09/25/08     09/15/09
                                                        Operations.
VCAPCD..................................        74.29  Soil Decontamination Operations     04/08/08     01/10/10
PCAPCD..................................          243  Polyester Resin Operations.....     04/10/03     12/07/10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On 01/21/10, EPA determined that the submittal for SMAQMD Rule 464 
met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51 Appendix V, which must 
be met before formal EPA review. On 02/04/10, EPA determined that the 
submittal for VCAPCD Rule 74.29 met the completeness criteria, and on 
01/13/11, EPA determined that the submittal for PCAPCD Rule 243 met the 
completeness criteria.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    There are no previous versions of PCAPCD Rules 243 in the SIP. We 
approved an earlier version of SMAQMD Rule 464 into the SIP on 04/19/00 
(65 FR 20912). We approved an earlier version of VCAPCD Rule 74.29 into 
the SIP on 07/16/02 (67 FR 46596). While we can act on only the most 
recently submitted version, we have reviewed materials provided with 
previous submittals.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rules?

    VOCs help produce ground-level ozone and smog, which harm human 
health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States 
to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. SMAQMD Rule 464 
limits VOC emissions from organic chemical plants. VCAPCD Rule 74.29 
establishes procedures for the treatment of soil contaminated with 
gasoline, diesel fuel or jet fuel. PCAPCD Rule 243 reduces the 
emissions of VOC from polyester resin operations. EPA's technical

[[Page 61058]]

support documents (TSDs) have more information about these rules.

II. EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is EPA evaluating these rules?

    Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the 
Act), must require Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for 
each category of sources covered by a Control Techniques Guidelines 
(CTG) document as well as each major source in nonattainment areas (see 
sections 182(a)(2) and (b)(2)), and must not relax existing 
requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). SMAQMD regulates an ozone 
nonattainment area (see 40 CFR part 81). SMAQMD has no major sources 
for this category but is covered by relevant CTGs. The stringency of 
requirements in submitted Rule 464 is generally consistent with the 
relevant guidance that help define RACT. VCAPCD and PCAPCD also 
regulate ozone nonattainment areas, but have no relevant major sources 
and no CTGs so RACT is not required for these rules.
    Guidance and policy documents that we use to evaluate 
enforceability and RACT requirements consistently include the 
following:
    1. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and 
Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988 (the Bluebook).
    2. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule 
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001 (the Little Bluebook).
    3. ``Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Batch Processes--
Alternative Control Techniques Information Document'' (EPA-453-93-017, 
02/94).
    4. ``Control of Volatile Organic Emissions from Manufacture of 
Synthesized Pharmaceutical Products'' (EPA-450-2-78-029, 12/78).
    5. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Industrial Cleaning 
Solvents'' (EPA-453/R-06-001, 09/06).
    6. ``Control of VOC Emissions from Manufacture of High-Density 
Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and Polystyrene Resins'' (EPA-450/3-83-
008, 11/83).
    7. ``Control of VOC Fugitive Emissions from Synthetic Organic 
Chemical Polymer and Resin Manufacturing Equipment'' (EPA-450/3-83-006, 
03/84).
    8. ``Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat 
Manufacturing Materials'' (EPA-453/R-08-004, 09/08).

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and 
guidance regarding enforceability, RACT, and SIP relaxations. The TSDs 
have more information on our evaluation.

C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules

    The TSDs for VCAPCD and PCAPCD describe additional rule revisions 
that we recommend for the next time the local agency modifies the rule.

D. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully 
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all 
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this 
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance. 
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are 
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we 
receive adverse comments by November 2, 2011, we will publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct 
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in 
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive 
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective 
without further notice on December 2, 2011. This will incorporate these 
rules into the Federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, 
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions 
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with 
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive 
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, these rules do not have Tribal implications as 
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
because the SIPs are not approved to apply in Indian country located in 
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct 
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United

[[Page 61059]]

States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 2, 
2011. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of 
these final rules does not affect the finality of these actions for the 
purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a 
petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the 
effectiveness of such rules or actions. Parties with objections to 
these direct final rules are encouraged to file a comment in response 
to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published 
in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than 
file an immediate petition for judicial review of these direct final 
rules, so that EPA can withdraw these direct final rules and address 
the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be 
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see 
section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: August 16, 2011.
Keith Tekata,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is 
amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(377)(i)(A)(5), 
(c)(378)(i)(C)(2), and (c)(389)(i)(B) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (377) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (5) Rule 464, ``Organic Chemical Manufacturing Operations,'' 
adopted on September 25, 2008.
* * * * *
    (378) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (2) Rule74.29, ``Soil Decontamination Operations,'' adopted on 
April 8, 2008.
* * * * *
    (389) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) Placer County Air Pollution Control.
    (1) Rule 243, ``Polyester Resin Operations,'' adopted on April 10, 
2003.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-25284 Filed 9-30-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```