alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
      [NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]
                 United States Court of Appeals
                     For the First Circuit





No. 98-1333

                        RONALD L'HEUREUX,

                           Petitioner,

                                v.

                JEFFREY J. PINE, ATTORNEY GENERAL,

                           Respondent.



           APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

           [Hon. Ernest C. Torres, U.S. District Judge]



                              Before

                     Selya, Stahl and Lynch,
                        Circuit Judges.
                                
                                


     Ronald L'Heureux on brief pro se.
     Aaron L. Weisman on brief for respondent.




November 10, 1998




                                
                                





     Per Curiam.  After careful review of the briefs and record,
and in light of the pending state court proceedings, we cannot say
that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the
petition for lack of exhaustion.  28 U.S.C. � 2254(b)(1); seeJohnson v. Moran, 812 F.2d 23, 23 (1st Cir. 1987); Layne v. Gunter,
559 F.2d 850, 851-52 (1st Cir. 1977).
     Petitioner's remaining arguments and requests are not properly
before this court.
     Affirmed.  See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.
















                               -2-
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1553 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1553

 To include Livingston, Union, and Stephenson Counties in Illinois to 
      the Lincoln National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2011

 Mr. Johnson of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Manzullo, and Mr. Costello) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include Livingston, Union, and Stephenson Counties in Illinois to 
      the Lincoln National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF BOUNDARIES OF LINCOLN NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    (a) Boundary Adjustment.--Section 443(b)(1) of the Consolidated 
Natural Resources Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-229; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) 
is amended by inserting ``, Livingston, Union, Stephenson,'' after 
``Warren''.
    (b) Map.--The Secretary of the Interior shall update the map 
referred to in section 443(b)(2) of the Consolidated Natural Resources 
Act of 2008 to reflect the boundary adjustment made by the amendment in 
subsection (a) of this section.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ray CARLISLE, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-10582.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 8, 1994.

Before: GOODWIN, SKOPIL, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to a writ of certiorari, the Supreme Court has vacated this court’s disposition of this ease — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 872, 127 L.Ed.2d 70 and remanded it for further consideration in light of *Ratzlaf v. United States,*510 U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994).

Upon due consideration, the Memorandum disposition filed June 22, 1992, is withdrawn and the judgment of the district court is reversed. The case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
Exhibit 10.1
                                                                    ------------

                         [Holland & Hart LLP Letterhead]

                                  June 16, 2004

Clinical Intelligence, Inc.
1629 York Street, Suite 102
Denver, Colorado 80206

     Re: Issuance of Common Stock of Clinical Intelligence, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This firm represents Clinical Intelligence, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"). This opinion has been requested with respect to certain matters
in connection with the issuance by the Company of up to 300,000 shares of Common
Stock, $.001 par value per share and the sale by certain shareholders of 925,000
shares of Common Stock (collectively the "Securities") pursuant to the Company's
amended registration statement on Form SB-1, File No. 333-110128 (the
"Registration Statement"), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 16, 2004.

     In connection with this opinion, we have examined the Registration
Statement, the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, records of
corporate proceedings with respect to the Securities and such other documents,
records, certificates, memoranda and other instruments as we deem necessary as a
basis for this opinion. We have assumed the genuineness and authenticity of all
documents submitted to us as originals, the conformity to originals of all
documents submitted to us as copies thereof, and the due execution and delivery
of all documents where due execution and delivery are a prerequisite to the
effectiveness thereof.

     On the basis of the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, we are of the
opinion that the Securities, when sold pursuant to the Registration Statement,
will be validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

     We hereby consent to be named in the Registration Statement as counsel to
the Company with respect to the proposed offering and to the filing of a copy of
this opinion as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registration Statement.

                                           Sincerely,

                                           /s/ Holland & Hart LLP

                                           Holland & Hart LLP
#### Johnny T. CAMP, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee (two cases).

Nos. 27683, 27684.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 22, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin," for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is felony theft;. the punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

Since the filing of his appeal, appellant has presented his personal affidavit wherein he moves to dismiss said appeal.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.



Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(the
Companies)



Written Statement by Chief
Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies Form 10-Q periodic
report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in that report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of that date.



|/s/ Michael D. Lockhart              
|-------------------------------------
|Michael D. Lockhart                  
|Chief Executive Officer              
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and         
|                                     
|/s/ Michael D. Lockhart              
|Michael D. Lockhart                  
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|Armstrong World Industries, Inc.     
|                                     
|Dated: October 30, 2003              



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit99.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, John R. Cooper, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avocent Corporation on Form 10-Q forthe quarterly period ended June 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of AvocentCorporation.

 
|   |   | By:/s/ John R. Cooper                                    |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Name: John R. Cooper                                     |
|   |   | Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Douglas E. Pritchett, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Avocent Corporation onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 28, 2002 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of AvocentCorporation.

 
|   |   | By:/s/ Douglas E.  Pritchett                                                                                    |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Name: Douglas E. Pritchett                                                                                      |
|   |   | Title:   Senior Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary |

 

----
Exhibit 4.1


 





 


 


CYCLACEL GROUP PLC


 


Company Number 5090795


 


SHARE CERTIFICATE


 


This is to Certify that [name]


of [address]


is the Registered holder of [number] Ordinary Shares
of 1p each fully paid, numbered


 


[no.] to [no.]


 


inclusive in the above named Company subject to the
Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company.


 


EXECUTED for and on behalf of the said Company this
[no.] day of [month year]


 


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Director

  	
   

  	
  Director / Secretary
EXHIBIT 10.9

                                 LOAN AGREEMENT

Made this 25th day of June, 2004.

BETWEEN:

      YUKON GOLD CORP. a Delaware Corporation (herein called "Yukon").

AND

      STAFFORD KAYE KELLEY (herein called "SKK")


1.    SKK agrees to lend to Yukon CDN$100,000 secured by a non-interest  bearing
      promissory  note due on demand (the Loan) in the form  attached  hereto as
      Schedule A.

2.    As  consideration  for  the  Loan  Yukon  agrees  to  pay  to SKK a fee of
      CDN$5,000.00 to cover due diligence and other expenses.

In witness whereof the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
date first written above.

YUKON GOLD CORP.

By:  /s/ Stafford Kelley
     ------------------------
     Stafford Kelley

By:  /s/ Warren Holmes
     ------------------------
     Warren Holmes

STAFFORD KAYE KELLEY


/s/ Stafford Kelley
----------------------------

<PAGE>

                                   SCHEDULE A

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

Amount: $100,000 Canadian

      FOR VALUE  RECEIVED,  the  undersigned  Yukon Gold Corp.,  promises to pay
Stafford Kaye Kelley,  or to his order,  the principal sum of $100,000  Canadian
which is non-interest bearing.

      The undersigned promises to pay the outstanding balance on demand.

      All or part of the principal sum due hereunder may be prepaid from time to
time without notice, bonus or penalty.

      The  undersigned  waives  presentment  for  payment,   demand,  notice  of
non-payment,  notice  of  dishonor,  protest  and  notice  of  protest  of  this
promissory  note and diligence in collection or bringing  suit,  and consents to
all extensions of time,  renewals,  waivers or modifications that may be granted
by the  holder  with  respect  to the  payment  or any other  provision  of this
promissory note.

      DATED this 25th day of June, 2004.

Yukon Gold Corp.

By:     /s/ Stafford Kelley
        --------------------------
        Stafford Kelley

By:     /s/ Warren Holmes
        --------------------------
        Warren Holmes
Exhibit 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Capital, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Michael S. WillnerMichael S. WillnerChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerInsight Capital, Inc.May 6, 2004/s/ John AbbotJohn AbbotSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerInsight Capital, Inc.May 6, 2004
Exhibit 31.3I, Norman Harris, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diamond Triumph AutoGlass, Inc  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.       Date: August 15, 2005 By: /s/ Norman Harris           Chief Executive Officer
Order entered December 29, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01352-CV

GENERAL PACKAGING CORPORATION, Appellant

V.

LEONARDO HERNANDEZ GARCIA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13137-D

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s December 22, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time 

to file a brief. Appellee shall file his brief by MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2015. We caution 

appellee that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent 

extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q of Insight Midwest, L.P. (the “Registrant”) forthe quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Registrant.

|        |   | /S/ MICHAEL S. WILLNER               |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |   | Michael S. Willner                   |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | Insight Midwest, L.P.                |
|   |   | May 15, 2007                    |

 

|        |   | /s/ JOHN ABBOT                                       |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | John Abbot                                           |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | Insight Midwest, L.P.                                |
|   |   | May 15, 2007                                    |

 

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1625 

To prohibit funding for the Development Innovation Ventures (DIV) program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Mr. MANZULLO (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. 

CONAWAY, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. GOHMERT, and Mr. POSEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit funding for the Development Innovation Ventures 

(DIV) program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING FOR DEVELOP4 MENT INNOVATION VENTURES (DIV) PRO5 GRAM. 

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—No funds available to the United 

7 States Agency for International Development (USAID) 

8 may be used to carry out the Development Innovation 

9 Ventures (DIV) program or any successor program. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1625 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect 

2 on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply 

3 with respect to funds available to USAID for the DIV pro4 gram or any successor program that are unobligated on 

5 or after such date of enactment. 

6 SEC. 2. DEBT REDUCTION. 

7 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds 

8 available to USAID for the DIV program or any successor 

9 program that are unobligated on or after the date of the 

10 enactment of this Act shall be deposited into the General 

11 Fund of the Treasury and shall be used only for reducing 

12 the debt of the Federal Government. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Cornelius HILL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28757.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1957.

*680C. C. Divine, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Houston, Eugene Brady and Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The complaint and information alleged that appellant unlawfully sold whisky in a wet area without first having procured a permit to sell such liquor from the Texas Liquor Control Board, or from the Administrator of such Board.

The offense charged is defined in art. 666-4(a), V.A.P.C., and the court, upon appellant’s plea of guilty, entered judgment assessing the punishment at four months in jail, which is within the terms of Sec. 41 of art. 666, V.A.P.C.

The sole question raised on the appeal is the contention that the punishment applicable to the offense is a fine of not more than $50 as provided in art. 666-4(c), Par. (3), V.A.P.C.

Art. 666-4i(c) is a separate section from art. 666-4(a) and the punishment provided in Par. (3) of art. 666-4(c) applies alone to the offense defined in Paragraph (1) of said Section of art. 666-4(c), V.A.P.C. H.B. 8, Acts 48th Leg., p. 339, ch. 221, Sec. 1.

The trial court did not err in applying the punishment fixed in art. 666-41, V.A.P.C., such -being the punishment provided for the violation of any provision of Article 666 for which a definite punishment is not provided. S.B. 117, Acts 48th Leg., p. 509, ch. 325, Sec. 8. Hill v. State,. Tex.Cr.App., 290 S.W.2d 677; Skaggs v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 195, 247 S.W.2d 906; Shafer v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 558, 209 S.W.2d 599.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Lawrence Reginald MILLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28763.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Henry M. Wade, Dist. Atty., George P. Blackburn, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*679PER CURIAM.

The conviction, on a plea of guilty before the court, is for the unlawful possession of marijuana; the punishment, 2 years.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC
MERCANTILE BANCORP

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the
quarter ended June 30, 2009

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the
Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this
Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 7, 2009 |  | /s/    NANCY A. GRAY                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                     |  | Nancy A. Gray, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                     | 
|                     |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission on its staff upon request.