alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert L. Van Nostrand, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

<Table>
<S>                                            <C>
                                                        /s/ ROBERT L. VAN NOSTRAND
                                               ---------------------------------------------
                                                          Robert L. Van Nostrand
                                                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 13, 2004
</Table>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1791 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 89
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1791

                          [Report No. 112-282]

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
                Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2011

    Mr. Rooney (for himself, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Miller of 
 Florida, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Nugent, Mr. Webster, 
 Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Young of Florida, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Posey, Ms. Ros-
Lehtinen, Mr. Deutch, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. West, 
 and Mr. Rivera) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                           November 14, 2011

  Additional sponsors: Mrs. Adams, Mr. Ross of Florida, Ms. Castor of 
                 Florida, Mr. Mica, and Mr. Southerland

                           November 14, 2011

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
                Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 101 South United 
States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Alto Lee Adams, 
Sr., United States Courthouse''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 89

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1791

                          [Report No. 112-282]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
                Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 14, 2011

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
TXZE A~~OEZNEYGENERAL 

OFTEXAS 

Honorable D. W. Burkhalter 

County Attorney 

Throokmorton County 

Throolanorton, Texas 

Dear Sirs Opiaion No. 04874 

Ret Authority of Cordrsionerr’ Court 

to pay for speoial electioa ia orderthat v&errs may decide whether 

county should employ trapper, etc. 

Your requett for our oplaioa ia the above captioned matter has beea re+ 

oeived, and m quota from your letter as folloasr 

"The CwaniasionersCourt of this oouaty has ordsro&ma eleotion to be held on 

the 15th day of April, 1944, to dotemire nhother or not the voters of the 

ooqty desire the oonmissionsrs* court to employ trappers to trap predatory 

animals inthis county. 

'And the question has arirea among 8cm of *ihe oonmiesionere a8 to whether or 

not they are authoriesd, or have the authority, to pay for the holding of such 

an election, out of the General FUds of the oouaty~ and 

"Also whether or mot, in the wart the elsotion should aamy, or be ia favor 

of employing such trappers, whether or not thrgwould be authorized or have 

the authority~to employ such trapper+, and pay them out of the General Funds 

of the oouaty." 

After a careful study of the statutes, we find no provisions authoriziag the oomissioaers' oourt of Throc!mortoa County to call a speoial eleotioa 

in order that the voters may decide whether the oouxtty shall employ a trapper 

to trap predatory aaimals in said omaty. Siaoe the oomnisaioners' oourt does 

not have authority to call the above descritid eleotiom, it muat neoessarily 

follow that said body does not have the authority to pay for such am election. 

mare saolosiag a copy of Opinion IVo. O-2709 wri$tar by this department 

which we fell fully covers the powero of a o&ssioaere court to employ and 

pay a ooumty trapper for his semioes. 

very truly yours, 

JCD:db:eg* 

EnClOSlUYI ATl’ORBEy GENERU OF TEXAS 

AFPROVRD VU2 27, 1944 

/a/ Gee. P. inackburn 

(Acting) A.'TORNNY GENERAL OF TEXA2 

By /s/ J, C. Davis, Jr. 

Assi staat
#### HARBOR RECOVERY CORPORATION *v.*HARBOR REALTY ASSOCIATES ET AL.

(14796)

Dupont, C. J., and O’Connell and Landau, Js.

Argued December 6, 1995

decision released January 9, 1996

*Peter A. Berdon,*with whom, on the brief, was *Pasquale Young,*for the appellant (defendant Michael R. Caporale, Jr.).

*Mark A. Rosenblum,*with whom, on the brief, was *Brendan T. Flynn,*for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Linda L. Perry, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wings & Things,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.



                         /s/ Linda L. Perry
Date: August 8, 2006    ___________________________________________
                        Linda L. Perry, Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1721 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1721

To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to increase 
the maximum amount that may be allotted to Puerto Rico under part A of 
                               title III.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 4, 2011

  Mr. Pierluisi (for himself, Mr. Faleomavaega, Ms. Bordallo, and Mr. 
    Sires) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 to increase 
the maximum amount that may be allotted to Puerto Rico under part A of 
                               title III.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening the Teaching of 
English in Puerto Rico Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AMOUNT THAT MAY BE ALLOTTED TO PUERTO RICO.

    Section 3111(c)(3)(D) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6821(c)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ``0.5'' and 
inserting ``2''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6277

LYNN HATCHER SANDERS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, Virginia Correctional Center for

Women,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-354-R)

Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynn Hatcher Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief

on her petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.

1998), and denying her "motion . . . for release on parole." We

have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. Sanders v. Warden, Va. Correctional Ctr. for Women, No. CA97-354-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 4, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
H. R. 1791 

One Hundred Twelfth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twelve 

An Act 

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 South United 

States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United 

States Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The United States courthouse under construction at 101 South 

United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse 

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 

‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Fred PERRY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27327.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*80PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of procuring, and his punishment was assessed at one month in jail and a fine of $50.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          53,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,870
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 933,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,387,343
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (453,625)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   933,718
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               131,085
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   92,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,924
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
#### Pete MATA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28533.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 7, 1956.

No attorney for’ appellant of record on .•appeal. .

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for tpe State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the possession of -marihuana; the punishment,.four.years in ±he penitentiary. ...

The testimony of two police officers shows that under authority of a search warrant they searched appellant’s upstairs apartment. Officer Kline searched inside and Officer McCown went through the rear door of the apartment onto a porch where he found in a water drain a jar which contained marihuana, re-entered the apartment, showed the jar to the appellant, and asked him where the other marihuana was located. Appellant:, in response tó' Officer McCown’s question, went onto "the rear porch and took a can which contained 150 marihuana cigarettes ' from under a’ small platform and delivered it to him.'

Appellant, while testifying in his- .own behalf, admitted, in substance the .facts related by the pojice .officers .except that he had no knowledge of the marihuana and did not get a can containing marihuana cigarettes from the porch and deliver it to Officer McCown. He further stated that he saw the jar and the can for the first time when Officer McCown brought rthem into the .apartment and that he had no prior knowledge of them.

Appellant's requested charge stating that if another person .placed the marihuana on the upstairs porch and appellant had no knowledge thereof to acquit him was in substance included in the court’s main charge. Hence the refusal of the requested charge was not error.

The issues of fact were resolved by thé jury against the appellant, and. we find the. evidence sufficient to support their Verdict. ''

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### Mary PENA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27882.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1955.

*755No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for a violation of the liquor law in Lubbock County; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

Theundersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofInsight Midwest, L.P. (the “Registrant”) for the quarter ended September 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|        | /s/ MICHAEL  S. WILLNER                              |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael S. Willner                                   |
|   | Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer            |
|   | Insight Midwest, L.P.                                |
|   | November 14, 2006                               |
|   | /s/ JOHN ABBOT                                       |
|   | John Abbot                                           |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Insight Midwest, L.P.                                |
|   | November 14, 2006                               |

 

----
Motion Granted in Part and Denied as Moot in Part ; Order filed October 29, 2019 .

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 18
- 00486
- CV

____________ IN RE ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR., Relator

____________ NO. 14
- 18
- 00487
- CV

____________ ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR . , Appellant V. BANK OF AMERICA N.A. , Appellee
On Appeal from the 151st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017
- 39002


### ORDER On October 10, 2019, appellant filed a motion to recall the mandate in these consolidated proceedings on the ground that he did not receive notice of this court’s2 opinion and judgment issued July 23, 2019. Appellant’s motion is granted in cause number 14

- 18

- 00487

- CV, the appe al in these proceedings. Because no mandate issued in cause number 14

- 18

- 00486

- CV, appellant’s motion is denied as moot. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due in this court on or before November 8, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot. (Chief Justice Frost would deny the motion).
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
KIK Technology International, Inc.
File No. 000-30071


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  October 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William M.  Knooihuizen,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 8, 2004                            By: /s/ William M. Knooihuizen
      ----------------                               ---------------------------
                                                          William M. Knooihuizen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  October 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Kuldip C. Baid, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 8, 2004                            By: /s/ Kuldip C. Baid
      ----------------                               ---------------------------
                                                                  Kuldip C. Baid
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained by KIK
Technology  International,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.