alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1752 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1752

    To require the Federal Communications Commission to promulgate 
   regulations requiring a label to be displayed on the packaging of 
certain baby monitors to warn that the signals of such monitors may be 
                  intercepted by potential intruders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2011

 Mr. Crowley introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Federal Communications Commission to promulgate 
   regulations requiring a label to be displayed on the packaging of 
certain baby monitors to warn that the signals of such monitors may be 
                  intercepted by potential intruders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Children Safe Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. FINDING.

    Congress finds that parents deserve to know that the signals of 
analog baby monitors may be intercepted by potential intruders.

SEC. 3. FCC REGULATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
promulgate regulations requiring the warning label described in 
subsection (b) to be displayed on the packaging of a baby monitor.
    (b) Warning Label Described.--The warning label described in this 
subsection is the following:
            (1) In the case of a baby monitor that transmits video and 
        audio, a label that reads as follows: ``WARNING: WHAT YOU SEE, 
        THEY CAN SEE. Images and sounds captured by this device may be 
        easily viewed or heard by potential intruders outside your 
        home.''.
            (2) In the case of a baby monitor that transmits only 
        audio, a label that reads as follows: ``WARNING: WHAT YOU HEAR, 
        THEY CAN HEAR. Sounds captured by this device may be easily 
        heard by potential intruders outside your home.''.
    (c) Baby Monitor Defined.--In this Act, the term ``baby monitor'' 
means any set of devices that--
            (1) consists of one or more analog transmitting devices 
        that wirelessly transmit images or sounds to one or more 
        receiving devices;
            (2) allows an individual to see images of or hear sounds 
        made by another individual from a short distance within or 
        around a residence; and
            (3) is designed for use by an individual to monitor a child 
        in the care of such individual in a residential setting.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-121857) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-93697 and 333-93695) of QMed, Inc. of our reports dated February 9, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.

 

/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.

 

Edison, New Jersey

February 9, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            9439
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  2281
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     184995
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           12516
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             12814
<LOANS>                                         208186
<ALLOWANCE>                                       5475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  438283
<DEPOSITS>                                      304351
<SHORT-TERM>                                     10189
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               6978
<LONG-TERM>                                      91401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1321
<OTHER-SE>                                       24043
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  438283
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  21194
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 9525
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 30787
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               11671
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16480
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            14307
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    12882
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                1338
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   9496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4105)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      (1919)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1919)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.37)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.87
<LOANS-NON>                                       8573
<LOANS-PAST>                                         4
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   7429
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  4134
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    11556
<RECOVERIES>                                        15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 5475
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              5475
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7378
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARVIN BREWER, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-231-A, CA-95-178-1-V) Submitted: December 30, 1997 Decided: January 15, 1998 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Marvin Brewer, Appellant Pro Se. William Mark Boyum, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing six of seven claims contained in his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We therefore dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**@ROAD,INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of @Road, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael Martini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

May 9, 2006

 
| /s/ Michael Martini     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Michael Martini         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Floyd Monroe STEVENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28155.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1956.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the transportation of intoxicating liquor in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $100.

■ The record on appeal contains-no statement of facts or bills of exception. All • proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.. The judgment is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GenaissancePharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned, Ben Kaplan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                     | /s/ Ben Kaplan          |   |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date:    May 5, 2005 | Ben Kaplan              |
|                                     | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of eRoomSystem  Technologies,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2005, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  David A. Gestetner,  Chief Executive  Officer  (Principal  Executive
Officer),  President  and Chief  Financial  Officer  (Principal  Accounting  and
Financial  Officer) of the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                              President, Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ David A. Gestetner    and Chief Financial Officer          May 20, 2005
--------------------------
David A. Gestetner            (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
                              Financial and Accounting Officer )
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           AUG-2-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              AUG-4-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-2-1997
<CASH>                                           5,473
<SECURITIES>                                        64
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,316
<ALLOWANCES>                                       606
<INVENTORY>                                     11,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,240
<PP&E>                                          14,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,828
<BONDS>                                          5,854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,769
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,725
<SALES>                                         58,480
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,480
<CGS>                                           42,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (514)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,448
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,339
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,339
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .85
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6415

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT LEE MCQUEEN, a/k/a Preacher,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (5:09-cr-00253-F-1; 5:12-cv-00693-F)

Submitted: August 30, 2016 Decided: September 8, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Lee McQueen, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine L. Fritz, Tobin 

Webb Lathan, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Lee McQueen seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

McQueen has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny 

McQueen’s motions for a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary 

hearing and for an emergency medical procedure, both at the 

Government’s expense, and to amend his petition for a certificate 

of appealability. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 
3

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
| Dated:   March 30, 2011       | /s/ Raul S. McQuivey                                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         | Raul S. McQuivey                                                          |   |
|                                         | President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)   |   |
|                                         |                                                                      |   |
|                                         |                                                                      |   |
| Dated:   March 30, 2011  | /s/ Sidney C. Hooper                                                 |   |
|                                         | Sidney C. Hooper                                                |   |
|                                         | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
|                                         |                                                                      |   |

----
EXHIBIT 24
 
    KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Thomas A. Russo, Michael R. Milversted and Karen
M. Muller and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name,
place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Lehman Brothers Inc., for the fiscal year ended November 30, 1995 and
any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto,
and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he
might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
Dated: As of February 28, 1996
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>
          /s/ RICHARD S. FULD, JR.
 
            /s/ PHILIP CALDWELL
 ............................................
              Richard S. Fuld,
             Jr.Philip Caldwell
 
         /s/ T. CHRISTOPHER PETTIT
 
          /s/ HOWARD L. CLARK, JR.
 ............................................
               T. Christopher
         PettitHoward L. Clark, Jr.
 
              /s/ ROBERT MATZA
 
            /s/ FREDERICK FRANK
 ............................................
                   Robert Matza
                  Frederick Frank
 
             /s/ DAVID GOLDFARB
 
         /s/ SHERMAN R. LEWIS, JR.
 ............................................
                 David Goldfarb
               Sherman R. Lewis, Jr.
 
            /s/ ROGER S. BERLIND
 
             /s/ MALCOLM WILSON
 ............................................
                 Roger S. Berlind
                  Malcolm Wilson
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 143 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 143

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate tax and 
                   retain stepped-up basis at death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

Mr. Latta (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, 
 Mr. Jones, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Burgess, 
  Mr. Bartlett, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Bishop of Utah, and Mr. 
   Lamborn) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate tax and 
                   retain stepped-up basis at death.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Permanently Repeal the Estate Tax 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE TAX AND RETENTION OF BASIS STEP-UP.

    Effective for estates of decedents dying after December 31, 2010, 
chapter 11 of subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
repealed.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13353]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03552]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Interdisciplinary Aging Infrastructure.
    Date: March 20, 2024.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kaitlyn Noel Lewis Hardell, Ph.D., M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National 
Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 
2E405, (301) 555-1234, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b707a726f77627535737a697f7e77775b757273357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3358525a475f4a5d1d5b524157565f5f735d5a5b1d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 15, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-03552 Filed 2-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>