alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03403]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Healthcare Decision Making.
    Date: March 18, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Janetta Lun, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg. Suite 213, (301) 496-9666, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#385259565d4c4c5916544d5678565150165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="294348474c5d5d4807455c4769474041074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 14, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-03403 Filed 2-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Opinion filed November 8, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-18-00294-CR

__________

IN RE BRANDON G. FIELDING

Original Mandamus Proceeding

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator, Brandon G. Fielding, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus 

in this court. He requests that we require the district clerk of Eastland County to

perform ministerial duties related to Article 11.07, section 3(c) of the Texas Code of 

Criminal Procedure. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(c) (West 2015). 

Relator asserts that the district clerk has failed to transmit a copy of certain 

documents as required. We dismiss Relator’s petition for want of jurisdiction.

A court of appeals has no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a 

district clerk unless necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court of appeals. In 

re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181, 182 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. 

proceeding). Relator has not shown that a writ of mandamus directed to the district 
2

clerk is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction 

to issue a writ of mandamus against the district clerk.

Additionally, Relator references the clerk’s duties to transmit copies of 

various documents to the Court of Criminal Appeals pursuant to Article 11.07, 

section 3(c). We have no jurisdiction to grant the relief requested by Relator with 

respect to a pending Article 11.07 writ. See Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 

Fifth Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117–18 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (indicating that the 

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction when an Article 11.07 

application is pending). We have no authority to issue writs of mandamus in 

criminal law matters pertaining to proceedings under Article 11.07. In re McAfee, 

53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).

Should an applicant find it necessary to complain about the processing of an 

Article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus, the applicant may seek 

mandamus relief from the Court of Criminal Appeals. See Benson v. District Clerk, 

331 S.W.3d 431 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011). 

Relator’s petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

November 8, 2018

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Willson, J.; 

Gray, C.J., 10th Court of Appeals1;

and Wright, S.C.J.2

Bailey, C.J., and Willson, J., not participating.

 

1Tom Gray, Chief Justice, Court of Appeals, 10th District of Texas at Waco, sitting by assignment 

to the 11th Court of Appeals.

2

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BOE Financial Services, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the periods ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
780(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2003, and for the periods then ended.



|/s/ George M. Longest, Jr.George M. Longest, Jr. Chief Executive Officer    |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                                            | 
|/s/ Bruce E. ThomasBruce E. Thomas Chief Financial Officer  August 12, 2003 |  | 



19
# GK Gallagher& Kennedy

December 5 , 2013 VIA HAND DELIVERY Barnes Jo hn so n Acting Director Offi ce Re so urce Co n serva ti o n and Recovery Envi ronmen t al Protection Agency 1200 Pe nn sy l va n ia Avenue, N .W. Wash in gto n , DC 20460 Re: Proposed Ru l e on the Definition o f " So lid Waste, " 76 Fed . Reg. 44 , 094 (July 22, 2011} (EPA Dkt. N o. EPA- HQ-RCRA- 2010-0 742c} De ar Mr . Jo hnson : Free port - McMoRan Copper 

### & Gold In c. (Freeport} appreciate s the opportu ni ty to meet wit h you today to di s cu ss t he U . S. En vironm e ntal Protection Agency 's (EPA ' s} 20 11 Proposed Rule on the definition of "s olid waste " and th e s peci fic concern s rai sed i n Freeport ' s 2011 Comment (EPA Dkt . No . EPA- HQ-RCRA-2010 -074 2- 0363). To fa cil i tate review of Fre epo rt 's c itations to EPA' s public records noted at our m e eti n g and in Freeport' s 201 1 Comment, we h ave e nclosed copies for your reference. We al so h ave e nclose d a co py of today's pres e ntation s ummarizing our co ncern s, re gu lat ory options, and proposed alt e rn at ives for EPA's cons id e ration . Ve ry truly you rs, GALLAG HER 

### & KENNEDY, P.A .

EPA R EGION IX W ASTE M A NAGE M ENT D IVISION , RCRA EN FORCEME N T O FFICE, RCRA C O M PLIA N CE EVALUATIO N I NSPECTIO N RE PORT FOR P HELPS D ODGE M IA M I, IN C. (Apr i l 9 , 2002) ; (3) EPA RE G I ON IX W ASTE M A N AGEME NT D IVI SI O N, R CRA E NFORCE M ENT O FFICE, RCRA C O M PLIA N CE E VAlUATIO N IN SPECTIO N R EPORT FOR BHP CO PPER SA N M A N UEL FACiliTY (Ap r il 8, 2002) (unoffic i al c opy); and (4) EPA REG IO N I X W ASTE M ANA GE M ENT DI VISIO N , R C RA EN FO R CE M ENT O FFICE, R C R A CO M PLIAN CE E VALUATIO N I N SPECTIO N R EP ORT FO R AsARC O IN C . RAY C O M PLEX HAY DE N S M ELTER ( Apr il l6, 2002 ) ( unoff i cia l co py) . 3930 41 9 vl/ 2 5 0 0 0 -04 10 

### 2575 East Camelback Road I Phoenix. Arizona 85016·9225 I P. 602-530·8000 I F: 602·530·8500 I www.gknet.com
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Branagan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/Paul Branagan                                 |  
 

Paul Branagan

 
 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

July 11, 2006 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit
      10.2





**Summary
      of Performance Measures Established for the WebEx Executive Cash Bonus Plan**










On
      February 7, 2006, the Board of Directors of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the
      “Company” or “WebEx”) established the performance measures for the WebEx
      Executive Cash Bonus Plan (the “Plan”), effective as of January 1, 2006. The
      Plan is not set forth in a written agreement. The Plan covers WebEx’s chief
      executive officer, its chief operating officer, its chief financial officer
      and
      certain other executive officers.






Each
      participant in the Plan will be assigned an annual target bonus. The Plan sets
      Company performance benchmarks for incremental quarterly revenue--that is,
      revenue in excess of the revenue for the preceding quarter, excluding
      significant non-recurring revenue items--and a formula for determining bonuses
      based on achievement of those benchmarks. Bonuses are calculated and paid
      quarterly. The bonuses may be reduced for failure to achieve the revenue
      benchmarks and may be eliminated entirely if the revenue falls below a certain
      threshold. Bonuses may be increased for achieving incremental quarterly revenue
      above the benchmarks, if such over-achievement of incremental quarterly revenue
      also meets certain profitability criteria. The maximum bonus payable under
      the
      plan is 200% of the target bonus each quarter. Bonus amounts otherwise due
      may
      also be reduced or eliminated for failure to achieve certain profitability
      benchmarks and may also be reduced by up to 20% for failing to achieve other
      special objectives set by the Board’s Compensation Committee. The Compensation
      Committee set special objectives for the first quarter of 2006 based on quality
      of the Company’s services.






The
      Compensation Committee has the ability to reset targets for significant events,
      such as changes in accounting rules or merger and acquisition activity. Bonuses
      for the vice president of worldwide sales and service are based 20% on the
      Plan
      and 80% on achievement of his individual compensation plan. The bonuses of
      certain other vice presidents will be based 50% on the Plan and 50% on
      individual objectives.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

EDWARD DUNPHY, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 361 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
#### Willie WINN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28326.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 16, 1956.

*912No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is possession of marihuana; the punishment, 3 yeárs in the penitentiary.

■The récord on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register: February 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 34)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 7550-7551]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22fe10-4]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

16 CFR Part 1130

 
Requirements for Consumer Registration of Durable Infant or 
Toddler Products; Correction

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (``Commission'') is 
correcting a final rule that appeared in the Federal Register of 
December 29, 2009 (74 FR 68668). The document issued a final rule under 
section 104(d) of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008 
(``CPSIA'') requiring manufacturers of durable infant or toddler 
products to establish and maintain a system for consumers to register 
their products with the manufacturer.

DATES: The correction will become effective on June 28, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc Schoem, Deputy Director, Office 
of

[[Page 7551]]

Compliance and Field Operations, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 
4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504-7520; 
mschoem@cpsc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. E9-30485 appearing on page 68668 
in the Federal Register of Tuesday, December 29, 2009, there was a 
discrepancy between the text describing the registration form and the 
figures illustrating the form. The regulatory text reversed the 
location of information on the bottom of the form. To address this, the 
following corrections are made:


Sec.  1130.6  [Corrected]

    1. On page 68677, in the first and second columns, in Sec.  1130.6, 
in paragraph (b)(3), ``The bottom front panel shall have blocks for the 
consumer to provide his/her contact information as required in Sec.  
1130.7(c).'' is corrected to read ``The bottom back panel of the form 
shall have blocks for the consumer to provide his/her contact 
information as required in Sec.  1130.7(c).''
    2. On page 68677, in the second column, in Sec.  1130.6, in 
paragraph (b)(3), ``The back of the bottom portion of the form shall be 
pre-addressed and postage-paid with the manufacturer's name and mailing 
address where registration information is to be collected.'' is 
corrected to read ``The front of the bottom portion of the form shall 
be pre-addressed and postage-paid with the manufacturer's name and 
mailing address where registration information is to be collected.''

    Dated: February 16, 2010.
Todd Stevenson,
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-3297 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0568 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-010-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6285

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TALEEK SHERROD SWINNEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:13-cr-00422-LMB-1; 1:15-cv-00251-LMB)

Submitted: August 25, 2016 Decided: August 30, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Taleek Sherrod Swinney, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren Elizabeth 

Britsch, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; 

Michael John Frank, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Taleek Sherrod Swinney seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Swinney has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service                               ( print page 13763)                            Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 23, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 188 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-189, CP2024-195.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-03655 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P