alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lucille HARDIMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27587.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 4, 1955.

R. E. Murphey, Coleman, for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. .

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the unlawful possession of beer and wine in a dry area for the. purpose of sale; the punishment, sixty days in jail and a fine of $100. .

It was stipulated that Coleman County was a dry area.

The testimony of three peace officers, while testifying for the state, showed that appellant was present at the time they found eight quarts of beer and three quarts of wine in her residence.

Appellant, while testifying in her own behalf, admitted that she possessed in her residence the eight quarts of beer and three quarts of wine as shown by the state, but testified that she possessed it for her own use and not for sale.

The court, in its charge, applied the prima facie evidence statute to the possession of the wine. We find the evidence sufficient to support the verdict of the jury. Arts. 666-3a(5) and 666-23a(2), Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; Sanders v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 68, 204 S.W.2d 835.

We have carefully examined the six informal bills of ' exception indexed and shown in the- statement of facts and are of. the opinion that they do not show error.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13108-13109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03414]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:

    Name and Committee Code: Proposal Review Panel for Materials 
Research--Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) 
Site Visit University of Chicago (DMR) (#1203).
    Date and Time: May 2, 2024; 7:30 a.m.-6:45 p.m.; May 3, 2024; 8:00 
a.m.-3:45 p.m.
    Place: University of Chicago, 929 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 
60637.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Cosima Boswell-Koller, Program Director, 
National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 
22314; Telephone: 703-292-4959.
    Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to conduct a review during year 
4 of the award period as stipulated in the cooperative agreement.
    Agenda: To conduct an in depth evaluation of performance, to assess 
progress towards goals, and to provide recommendations.

Thursday, May 2, 2024

7:30 a.m.-12:05 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)
12:05 p.m.-1:00 p.m.--Lunch (Open)
1:00 p.m.-2:30 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)
2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m.--Facilities Overview and Lab Tour (Closed)
3:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m.--Poster Session (Open)
5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)

Friday, May 3, 2024

8:00 a.m.-3:45 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)

    Reason for Closing: The program being reviewed during the site 
visit will include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical

[[Page 13109]]

information; financial data, such as salaries, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the program. These matters are 
exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 14, 2024.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-03414 Filed 2-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished herewith.

Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(the Companies)

Written
Statement by Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies Form 10-Q periodic report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Companies as of that date.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael D. Lockhart                        
|Michael D. Lockhart                            
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and                   
|Armstrong World Industries, Inc.               

Dated: July 27, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Thomas Hollan YOUNG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 37454.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 16, 1964.

J. Harlan Fleming, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Doug Crouch, Dist. Atty., Truman Power, Asst. Dist. Atty., Fort Worth, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Upon a plea of guilty to the offense of robbery by assault before the court without a jury, the punishment was assessed at twelve years.

The evidence as agreed and stipulated by the state, the appellant in person, and his counsel, reveals that Ronald Kesler identified the appellant as the same person who entered his grocery store and by force took $150 in money from his possession and without his consent by putting him in fear of bodily injury and his life.

The appellant did not testify.

*891There are no bills of exception.

The evidence is sufficient to support the conviction, and no error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### Nolan Douglas STEVENS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27321.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $100.

No statement of facts or bills of exception appear in the record.

The judgment herein recites that the jail term was probated.

In compliance with the holding in Gilderbloom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 272 S.W.2d 106, the judgment herein is reformed so as to eliminate the provision for probation and, as reformed, is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------

National Home Health Care Corp.
Scarsdale, New York

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.  033-61315  and  333-46076) of National Home Health
Care Corp. and Subsidiaries of our report dated October 7, 2005, relating to the
consolidated  financial statements,  which appear in this Annual Report on Forms
10-K.  We also  consent to the  incorporation  by  reference of our report dated
October  7, 2005,  relating  to the  financial  statement  schedule,  which also
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

BDO Seidman, LLP
Valhalla, New York

October 28, 2005
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
and Post Effective Amendments on Form S-3 File Nos. 333-08319, 33-63613,
33-51837, 33-28381 and 33-9541 of Lehman Brothers Inc. and in the related
Prospectuses, of our report dated January 7, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Lehman Brothers Inc. included in this 1996
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1996.
 
                                          Ernst & Young LLP
 
New York, New York
February 28, 1997
# Memorandu m

u . s. Departm e nt of Transportation O ffi c e o f th e Secretary O f Trans po rtati on Sub ject: Notice of Communication in Docket DOT-OST-20 1 3

- - B20 4 D ate: Febru ary 10 ,2 015 From: The Secretary~ To: Chief, Dockets In accordance with D epartment rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporti ng the fo l lo w ing communic ation . I On June 4, during a telephone call with Senat or Debbie Stabenow of Michigan , she raised the s ubject of the Department ' s p r oceeding to consider No rwegian Air International ' s foreig n air carrier permit application . She expressed her opposition to the application . I explained that w hile I appreciated her in terest in this matter , I could not commen t on it s merit s because the proceeding was under acti v e consideration b y th e Departm ent . Please pl a ce this mem o randum in the appropriate Docket . cc: The Honorable Debbie Stabenow
CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET



 EXHIBIT 4.4 
  

CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET* 
  

					
	 TIA
 Section

	  	 	  	 Indenture
 Section


	310	  	(a) (1)	  	7.10
	 	  	(a) (2)	  	7.10
	 	  	(a) (3)	  	N.A.
	 	  	(a) (4)	  	N.A.
	 	  	(a) (5)	  	7.8; 7.10
	 	  	(b)	  	7.8; 7.10; 10.2
	 	  	(c)	  	N.A.
	311	  	(a)	  	7.11
	 	  	(b)	  	7.11
	 	  	(c)	  	N.A.
	312	  	(a)	  	2.5
	 	  	(b)	  	10.3
	 	  	(c)	  	10.3
	313	  	(a)	  	7.6
	 	  	(b) (1)	  	N.A.
	 	  	(b) (2)	  	7.6
	 	  	(c)	  	7.6; 10.2
	 	  	(d)	  	7.6
	314	  	(a)	  	4.2; 4.3; 10.2
	 	  	(b)	  	N.A.
	 	  	(c) (1)	  	10.4
	 	  	(c) (2)	  	10.4
	 	  	(c) (3)	  	N.A.
	 	  	(d)	  	N.A.
	 	  	(e)	  	10.5
	315	  	(a)	  	7.1(b)
	 	  	(b)	  	7.5; 10.2
	 	  	(c)	  	7.1(a)
	 	  	(d)	  	7.1(c)
	 	  	(e)	  	6.11
	316	  	(a) (1) (A)	  	6.5
	 	  	(a) (1) (B)	  	6.4
	 	  	(a) (2)	  	N.A.
	 	  	(b)	  	6.7
	 	  	(c)	  	8.4
	317	  	(a) (1)	  	6.8
	 	  	(a) (2)	  	6.9
	 	  	(b)	  	2.4
	318	  	(a)	  	10.1
	 	  	(c)	  	10.1


 N.A. means Not Applicable 
  
 *NOTE: This Cross-Reference Sheet relates to the Indenture, by and between Indevus
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, dated July 16, 2003, but shall not, for any purpose, be deemed to be a part of the Indenture.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1521 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1521

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2011

Mr. Lewis of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 
study of the West Hunter Street Baptist Church in Atlanta, Georgia, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``West Hunter Street Baptist Church 
Study Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study of the historic West Hunter Street Baptist Church, 
located at 775 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the area as a unit of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, State, 
        or local governmental entities, or private and nonprofit 
        organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or local 
        governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations or 
        any other interested individuals; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 
        development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance 
        associated with the alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 8 of Public Law 91-383 (16 
U.S.C. 1a-5; commonly known as the ``National Park Service General 
Authorities Act'').
    (d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DEION POWELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 313 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
exv4w4



 





Guarantee




     For value received, Ainsworth Engineered Corp., the Guarantor (which term
includes any successor Person under the Indenture), has unconditionally
guaranteed, to the extent set forth in the Indenture (as defined below) and
subject to the provisions in the Indenture dated as of May 19, 2004 as amended
by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of May 19, 2004 (as
amended, the “Indenture”) among Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd., a corporation
amalgamated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia and The Bank of
New York, as Trustee (the “Trustee”), (a) the due and punctual payment of the
principal of, premium and Special Interest, if any, and interest on the Notes
(as defined in the Indenture), whether at maturity, by acceleration, redemption
or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of interest on overdue principal and
premium, and, to the extent permitted by law, interest, and the due and
punctual performance of all other obligations of the Company to the Holders or
the Trustee all in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and (b) in case
of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of such
other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due or
performed in accordance with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether at
stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The obligations of the
Guarantor to the Holders of Notes and to the Trustee pursuant to this
Subsidiary Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set forth in the Indenture
and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms of the
Subsidiary Guarantee.



     The laws of the State of New York shall govern and be used to construe
this Subsidiary Guarantee.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Ainsworth Engineered Corp.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Catherine Ainsworth
 	 
	 	 	Catherine Ainsworth 	 
	 	 	Secretary
August 4, 2011

Ms. Elizabeth Craig Acting Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs U . S . EPA Headquarters Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Mail Code: 6201J Washington, DC 20460 Re: **Request for Extension of Time to allow**  **Submis sion of**  **Florida’s Applications for Critical Use Exemptions**  **Docket ID No. EPA**  **- HQ** **– OAR**  **– 2011**  **– 0431**  Dear Ms. Craig: Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association (FFVA) is a voluntary non - profit trade association whose mission is to enhance the competitive and busi ness environment for producing and marketing fruits , vegetables and other crops. As part of this mission , we filed for and received Critical Use Exemptions (CUEs) for the continued use of methyl bromide since the inception of the CUE process . Simultaneou sly, we have continuously been directly involved in the discussions and research surrounding the use of methyl bromide and potential alternative chemicals as preplant soil fumigants in plastic mulched culture of vegetables and ornamentals, and their use as preplant fumigants in nursery production of transplants necessary for propagation of transplants in support of those industries. We have been involved in this ongoing effort and research since the filing of the 1991 petition listing methyl bromide for re gulation under the U . S . Clean Air Act. In the June 14, 2011 Federal Register, the Agency published a notice requesting applications for CUEs for 2014, (76 Fed. Reg. 34700 - 03). FFVA and its producer members are i n the process of preparing a 2014 applicati on for submission to the P.O. Box 948153, Maitland, FL 32794 - 8153 • 800 Trafalgar Court, Suite 200, Maitland, FL 32751 321.214.5200 • fax 321.214.0210 • www.ffva.comE . C raig

August 4, 2011 Page 2 of 2 Agency. However, because of the press of other business, including but not limited to preparing for and participa ting in the meeting of the Open - Ended Working Group under the Montreal Protocol, additional time is needed to adequately prepare the requested application from Florida . FFVA respectfully re quests an extension of slightly more than 30 days to submit the applications, to September 16, 2011. It is believed that the additional time will not adversely impact the Agency’s judicious review of the applications and will assist FFVA in preparing the most robust applications possible. Issuing such brief extension is consistent with the public interest. We would request that the Agency include this request in the docket. Sincerely,

Daniel A. Botts Vic e President; Industry Relations

cc: Drusill a Hufford Jeremy Arling
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0043

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CORY ANN RUCKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including October 9, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 28 2023

08/28/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0043
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AVOCENT CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 12.1

ENZON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIESRatio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(in thousands)

|                                                             |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ | ---- | ----------------------- | ---- | ----- | ------ | - | ---- |  | ------ | -
|                                                             |      | Year Ended December 31,
|                                                             | 2010 |                         | 2009 |       | 2008   |   | 2007 |  | 2006  
|Determination of earnings:                                   |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes |      |                         | $    |       | (3,137 | ) |      |  |        | $
|Add:                                                         |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|Fixed charges                                                |      |                         |      | 7,159 |        |   |      |  | 12,300 |  
|                                                             |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|Earnings, as adjusted                                        |      |                         | $    |       | 4,022  |   |      |  | $      |  
|                                                             |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|Fixed charges:                                               |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|Interest expense (gross)(1)                                  |      |                         | $    |       | 6,315  |   |      |  | $      |  
|Portion of rent representative of the interest factor(2)     |      |                         |      | 844   |        |   |      |  | 786    |  
|                                                             |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|Fixed charges                                                |      |                         | $    |       | 7,159  |   |      |  | $      |  
|                                                             |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|Deficiency of earnings available to cover fixed charges      |      |                         | $    |       | (3,137 | ) |      |  |        | $
|                                                             |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           |      |                         |      | N/A   |        |   |      |  | N/A    |  
|                                                             |      |                         |      |       |        |   |      |  |        |  





|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)



---