alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1657 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the enforcement penalties 

for misrepresentation of a business concern as a small business concern 

owned and controlled by veterans or as a small business concern owned 

and controlled by service-disabled veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Mr. STUTZMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the enforcement penalties for misrepresentation of a business concern as a small business concern owned and controlled 

by veterans or as a small business concern owned and 

controlled by service-disabled veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1657 IH

1 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS EN2 FORCEMENT PENALTIES FOR MISREPRESEN3 TATION OF A BUSINESS CONCERN AS A 

4 SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN OWNED AND 

5 CONTROLLED BY VETERANS OR AS A SMALL 

6 BUSINESS CONCERN OWNED AND CON7 TROLLED BY SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS. 

8 Subsection (g) of section 8127 of title 38, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘Any business’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘(1) Any business’’; 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘a reasonable period of time, as 

13 determined by the Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘a pe14 riod of not less than five years’’; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraphs: 

17 ‘‘(2) In the case of a debarment under paragraph (1), 

18 the Secretary shall commence debarment action against 

19 the business concern by not later than 30 days after deter20 mining that the concern misrepresented the status of the 

21 concern as described in paragraph (1) and shall complete 

22 debarment actions against such concern by not later than 

23 90 days after such determination. 

24 ‘‘(3) The debarment of a business concern under 

25 paragraph (1) includes the debarment of all principals in 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1657 IH

1 the business concern for a period of not less than five 

2 years.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 54125

- 4

- II Respondent,

v. MATTHEW M. PEARSON, UNPUBLISHED OPINION Appellant.
W ORSWICK , J.

— Matthew Pearson appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance

— methamphetamine. Pearson argues that his conviction for possession of a
controlled substance should be vacated on the grounds that RCW 69. 5 0.4013(1) is
unconstitutional. The State concedes that Pearson’s conviction must be vacated. We agree. In May 2019, Pearson was convicted of po ssession of methamphetamine after a bench
trial. After Pearson was convicted and sentenced, our Supreme Court decided State v. Blake , 197 Wn.2d 170, 481 P.3d 521 (2021)

. In Blake , the Supreme Court held that Washington’s strict liability drug possession statute, RCW 69.50.4013 (1) , violates state and federal due process
clauses and therefore is void. 197 Wn.2d at 174

. A defendant cannot be convicted based on a void statute. See State v. Rice , 17 4 Wn.2d 884, 893, 279 P.3d 849 (2012) ; see also State v. Carnahan , 130 W n. App. 159, 164, 122 P.3d 187 (2005) (vacating a conviction that was based on a statute that the Supreme Court held was unconstitutional). Consequently, Pearson’s conviction for possession of methamphetamine must
be vacated. Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two May 11, 2021No. 541 25

- 4

- II

2

We accept the State’s concession and remand this case to the trial court to vacate Pearson’s conviction for unlawful possession of a controlled substance

— methamphetamine. A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appel late Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered.

_____________________________ Worswick, J. We concur:

______________________________ Lee, C.J.

______________________________ Sutton, J.
Exhibit 23.1


MS Group CPA LLC


6 Center Street Edison New Jersey 08817 USA


TEL: 732-885-1555 FAX: 732-885-0999


Website:www.mscpausa.com









Consent of Independent Auditors




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-162667) pertaining to China Swine Genetics, Inc. 2009 Stock and Stock Option Plan of our report dated September 20, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Sen Yu International Holdings, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.




/s/MS Group CPA LLC


Edison, New Jersey


December 2, 2010
1 The Honorable Richard H. Battey, United St ates District Judge for the District of South Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-3631

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Frank Jayrold Bettelyoun, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 27, 2010 Filed: April 30, 2010

___________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Frank Jayrold Bettelyoun appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 motion to correct a “clerical error” in the amended judgment in his criminal case. We agree with th e district court that the amended judgment accurately reflects the sentence imposed; th e type of error Be ttelyoun alleged was not a clerical error, seeUnited States v. Yakle , 463 F.3d 810, 811 (8th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 95-60489

_______________________ BRAD ROWLAND; JONES COUNTY GRAIN, Petitioners,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD, Respondents, LONE STAR RAILROAD, INC.; SOUTHERN SWITCHING COMPANY Intervenors.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(AB-425)

_________________________________________________________________ April 17, 1996 Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

The court has carefully considered petitioners’ challenge to the ICC abandonment order in light of their oral argument, briefs and pertinent portions of the reco rd. Having done so, we cannot conclude that the ICC order was arbitrary and capricious or not in acc ord with the law, nor were the commission procedures unfair or inadequate.

Petition for review DENIED .
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 17,975
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                               1,700
<OTHER-SE>                             4,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     (24,435)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                         (24,435)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         (24,435)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.01)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of
      I-trax, Inc. (the **“Company”**) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
      June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the **“Report”**), I, David R. Bock, Executive Vice
      President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      David R.
      Bock


David
      R.
      Bock


Executive
      Vice President and


Chief
      Financial Officer








August
      9,
      2007
#### O. L. BEACH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29006.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1957.

*645No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated, with a prior conviction for an offense of like character alleged to enhance the punishment; the punishment, six months in jail and a fine of $2,000.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000727742
<NAME> JSCE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      288
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9
<INVENTORY>                                        207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   552
<PP&E>                                            2316
<DEPRECIATION>                                     850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              525
<BONDS>                                           1934
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (375)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2688
<SALES>                                           3410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3410
<CGS>                                             2754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   265
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    194
<INCOME-TAX>                                        77
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (5)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       112
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First Security Bancorp, Inc. (the First Security) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 14, 2004, as amended on the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of
First Security, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Security.

|                       |  |                                                                                                                                          
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  August 12, 2004 |  | Signature  /s/ John G. Sullivan
                  John G. Sullivan
                  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32


                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  and in connection  with the filing by Soyo
Group,  Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of its
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the three  months  ended  June 30,  2005 (the
"Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



 /s/ MING TUNG CHOK
------------------------------
Name:  Ming Tung Chok
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 24, 2005


 /s/ NANCY CHU
------------------------------
Name:  Nancy Chu
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  August 24, 2005
master_ai_id

nsr_permit_no

owner company_name

airs_no sic county municipality source_classification 7 Farmers Coop Association Farmers Coop Assoc - Farmers Coop Cotton Gin

0724-Cotton Gin

Chaves Minor 46 1669 Farmers Coop Association Farmers Coop Assoc - Cotton Gin No1669

3500500740724-Cotton Gin

Chaves Hagerman Synthetic Minor 129 0961 Mesa Farmer's Co-op Mesa Farmers Coop - Cotton Gin No0961

3501300090724-Cotton Gin

Dona Ana Vado Synthetic Minor 140 GF Four Points Gin Four Points Gin

3501300200724-Cotton Gin

Dona Ana Mesilla No Permit Required 156 BE Harvey Gin Co BEHarvey Gin Co

3501300390724-Cotton Gin

Dona Ana Las Cruces No Permit Requiredstatus_desc

owner_address1

owner_address2

owner_city owner_state

owner_zip Closed Drawer R Hagerman NM 88232 Active Drawer R Hagerman NM 88232 Active PO Box 646 Mesquite NM 88048 Active Corner Union Ave & Sr-28 Mesilla NM 88046 Active PO Box 1057 Las Cruces NM 88004
28 November 2011

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations , M
- 30 West Building Ground Floor Room W1 2
- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590. Ladies/Gentlemen: In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR § 11.25, Omni Air International is petitioning the Administrator for an extension of Exemption No. 10041 . This exemption will expired on March 31, 2012 Exemption 10041 provides relief, under certai n conditions and limitations, from 14 CFR § 121.613, 121.619(a) and 121.625 to the extent necessary to: (1) dispatch an airplane, under IFR, to a destination airport; and (2) list an alternate airport for that destination airport when the Aerodrome Forecas t (TAF) for either one or both of those airports indicates by the use of conditional language such as “BECMG”, “PROB” or “TEMPO”, in the TAF that the weather could be below authorized weather mi nim um s at the time of arrival. Dispatch under these circumstan ces i s permitted if the information contained in the main body of the TAF used by the certificate holder’ s disp atch center shows, for each fli ght to be dispatched, that the weather at the desti nation airport and alternate airport listed in the dispatch rel ease will be at or above authorized weather minimums at the time of arrival

. This exemption has been used to the benefit of the traveling public for many years, with no known com prom ise of safety . W ith regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, the circumstances that warranted the initial grant of exemption continue to exist. The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. For this reason, and the reasons stated above, Omni Air International requests that a finding of good cau se be made for waiving publication in the Federal Register. Granting the request for relief will set no precedents. The existence of the exemption is well known and widely accepted. If any further information is required, please call me at (918) 831

- 3067

. Very truly yours,

Robert E. Zeng Director of Flight Operations Om ni Air International3303 N Sheridan Rd. Tulsa, Ok. 74115
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I,  Leslie  Kent,  Chief  Financial Officer of VerticalBuyer, Inc. certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report for the quarter ended June 30,
2001  on  Form  10-QSB  of  VerticalBuyer,  Inc.

     2.     Based  on  my  knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue  statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to  make  the  statements  made,  in light of the circumstances under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly  report;

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  know  to  us  by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  and  presented  in  this  quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  our  evaluation.

     c)  Disclosed  in this quarterly report any change in the issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly  report  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is reasonably likely to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent  functions):

     a)  All  significant  deficiencies  in  the design or operation of internal
controls  which  are  reasonably  likely  to  adversely  affect the registrant's
ability  to  record,  process,  summarize  and report financial information; and

     b)  Any  fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial  reporting.

Date:  June 30, 2004

                                              /s/Leslie  Kent
                                              -------------------------
                                              Leslie  Kent
                                              Chief  Financial  Officer


                                        9
<PAGE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2253

___________ Chris McClelland, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. John Joseph Squieri, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant, * * Timothy Alan Hills, * * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: November 5, 1998 Filed: November 10, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.A lthough the case caption lists appellant's name as Squieri," the pleading s 1 indicate that appellant's name is spelled "Squeri." The Honorable D. Brook Bartlett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for 2 the Western District of Missouri. -2- John Joseph Squeri, Jr. a

ppeals the district court's dismissal as untimely of his 1 2 motion to vacate an arbitratio n award entered against him by the National Association of Securities Dealers Office of Dispute Resolution (NASD), and the district court' s or der confirming the award. After review of the record and the parties' briefs, w e affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 7, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D17- 907, 3D17

- 905 & 3D17-903

Lower Tribunal No. 13

- 34684

________________



### Theron H. Worth, et al.,

Petitioners,

vs.



### The Estate of Idelle Stern, etc., et al.,

Respondents.

On Petitions for Writs of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Rodney Smith, Judge.

Wintter & Associates, P.A., and Christopher Q. Wintter and Max G. Soren

(Hollywood), for petitioners.

Stok Folk + Kon, and Robert A. Stok and Joshua R. Kon

, for respondents.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Our certiorari review of the trial court’s order granting Respondents’ motion

for leave to file a claim for punitive damages is limited to whether the trial courtapplied the correct law. TRG Desert Inn Venture, Ltd. v. Berezovsky

, 194 So. 3d

516, 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016). While we might have concerns regarding the

sufficiency of the evidence proffered by Respondents as to the alleged intentional

misconduct or gross negligence of Petitioners, on this record we are unable to

conclude that the trial court, in adjudicating Respondents’ motion for punitive

damages, failed to apply the correct law, i.e., the procedural standards set forth in

section 768.72 of the Florida Statutes.

Petitions denied.

2