alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.57
 OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSULTING AND CONFIDENTIAL DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT
 Agreement Effective Date OSI Consultant
 1. Nature of Consulting Services. Field Services
 2. Delivery of Consulting Services.
 (a)
 (b)
 3. Compensation and Reimbursement.
 (a)
 (b)
 4. Confidentiality.
 (a) Confidential Information




---



##### 



(b)
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 (c)
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f)
 (g)
 2




---



##### 



5. Intellectual Property. IP Rights
 6. Publication.
 7. Representation and Warranties.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 8. Indemnification. Losses
 9. Waiver and Release
 3




---



##### 



10. Term and Termination.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f)
 11. General.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 OSI:
    
    OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

At the address set forth at the beginning of this Agreement

Attention: General CounselConsultant:
    
    Bob Pinedo, MD, PhD 

At the address set forth in the records of the Company
 (d)
 4




---



##### 



(e)
 (f)
 (g)
 (h)
 (i)
 5




---



##### 



CONSULTANT
    
    
    
    OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC./s/
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/H.M. (Bob) Pinedo, M.D., Ph.D.
    
    
    
    Name:Title:
 6
#### EVERETTE MCGREGOR *v.*COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

(14103)

Lavery, Landau and SchaUer, Js.

Argued January 17

decision released February 13, 1996

*William Andrew Lichtenfels,*for the appellant (petitioner).

*Timothy J. Sugrue,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were *James E. Thomas,*state’s attorney, and *John Dropick,*senior assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (respondent).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 19
- 00488
- CV

Image Microsystems, Inc., Appellant

v. MET 4/12, Ltd., Appellee

FROM THE 345TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- GN
- 19
- 002392 , THE HONORABLE DUST IN M. HOWELL, JUDGE PRESID I NG

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Image Microsystems, Inc. has filed an unopposed moti on to dismiss this appeal , informing the Court that the parties hav e entered into a settlement agree ment

. In
accordance with the terms of the settlem en t agreement, the parties have agreed t o move that the appeal be dismissed with prejudice , that c osts should be paid by the part y incurring the same, and
that t he mandate be issued early to effectuate the dismissal of the appeal. We g rant appellant’s

mot io n and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a) (2)(A)

.

______________________________ ____________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice
Before Justices Goodw in, Baker, and Kelly Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion
Filed: November 1 , 201 9
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000248

17-MAY-2018

10:00 AM
#### Minnie WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27881.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 7, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin', for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Upon her plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area on two separate counts, on each of which her punishment was assessed at a fine of $200, totaling $400.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to' be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

I, Dennis B. Guthrie, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-KSB of Illini Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this annualreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in the annual report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this annual report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

 

b)             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c)              presented in this annual report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)              all significant deficiencies in thedesign or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial dataand have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

b)             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date:  | March 29, 2005          |   | /s/ Dennis B. Guthrie |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Dennis B. Guthrie       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### OLAN MILLS, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation, Appellant, v. CITY OF NICHOLASVILLE, Kentucky, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 17, 1955.

M. C. Red wine, Jr., Red wine & Red-wine, Winchester, for appellant.

William B. Buford, Nicholasville, for ap-pellees.

STEWART, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from the refusal of the lower court to grant injunctive relief against the enforcement of compliance by Olan Mills, Inc., a nonresident corporation, with an ordinance of the City of Nicholas-ville.

That municipality imposes an annual license fee of $50 upon each photograph gallery, itinerant photographer or photographer maintaining a shop within the city limits.

This Nicholasville. ordinance, with respect to a nonresident person,-firm or corporation doing photography business in that city,.is subject to the same objection pointed out in an Elizabethtown ordinance in Olan Mills, Inc., v. City of Elizabethtown, etc., Ky. 269 S.W.2d 201. The facts in this case; *mutatis mutandis,*are similar to those set fortlrin the City of Elizabethtown case, *523and the legal principle on which the latter case turned controls here! It follows appellant was entitled to the injunctive relief it sought. See also Cordell v. Commonwealth, Ky., 254 S.W.2d 484; Olan Mills, Inc., v. City of Maysville, etc., Ky., 272 S.W.2d 460.

Wherefore, the judgment is. reversed with directions that it be set aside and a new one entered declaring the ordinance void to the extent that it applies to appellant and any nonresident person, firm or corporation engaged in interstate commerce in the City of Nicholasville.

CAMMACK, J., dissenting.
#### Evett Melton REYNOLDS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28442.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, ’for the State. ‘

WOODLEY, Judge.- '

. - The- conviction .is. upon a plea, of guilty before the court under an indictment, in two counts, charging forgery and passing and attempting to-pass a forged instrument.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception.

The court, -in his judgment, found appellant guilty of forgery “and passing” and assessed a two year term in the penitentiary and the sentence follows the judgment.

A similar judgment where the court had assessed the punishment at seven years was reformed so as to adjudge the defendant guilty of forgery in Clark v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 289 S.W.2d 248.

The judgment is .reformed so:as to eliminate the words “and passing” and adjudge appellant guilty of forgery, and the sentence is reformed so as to conform to the judgment. -

As reformed, the-judgment is affirmed.'
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 7565]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3408]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME: Saturday, February 11, 2012, 2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: Telephonic Meeting.

SUBJECT: Notice of Special Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of 
Governors.
SUMMARY: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will 
meet in a special session to consider the issue of Board leadership 
following the recent departure of the Board Chairman. The BBG will be 
meeting at the time listed above. At the meeting, which will be 
conducted telephonically, the BBG will consider the conduct of Board 
operations in the absence of a Chair. Due to the meeting's short 
notice, the Agency is unable to make it available for public 
observation via live streaming webcast. However, a complete audio 
recording and a verbatim transcript of the meeting will promptly be 
made available for public observation on the BBG's public Web site at 
www.bbg.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-3408 Filed 2-9-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of JSCE, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles A. Hinrichs, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/CHARLES A. HINRICHSCharles A. Hinrichs
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|March 10, 2003                                                                       | 

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the amendment to quarterly report of
I-trax, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, David R. Bock, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


/s/ David R. Bock
-----------------------
David R. Bock
Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2004

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Emanuel Chirico, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:  December 9, 2010


|      |                                                      | 
|----- | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
|By:   | /s/ EMANUEL CHIRICO                                  | 
|Name: | Emanuel Chirico
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

      ( print page 12420)    
In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

Iraq

Kuwait

Lebanon

Libya

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

Syria

Yemen

Lindsay Kitzinger,

International Tax Counsel, (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 2024-03269 Filed 2&nnhjc vdash;15-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIR RAIHAN ALI,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-75031

Agency No. A098-251-988

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Mir Raihan Ali, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration

judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de

novo constitutional challenges to removal orders, and review for substantial

FILED

FEB 28 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-75031

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Lopez-Rodriguez v. Mukasey, 536 F.3d

1012, 1015 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review. 

Even assuming that Ali’s allegedly unlawful arrest and detention was an

egregious violation of his constitutional or regulatory rights, the agency did not err

in concluding that there was substantial independent evidence in the record to

establish that he nonetheless was subject to removal as charged. See Hoonsilapa v.

INS, 575 F.2d 735, 738 (9th Cir.), modified by 586 F.2d 755 (9th Cir. 1978) (the

mere fact of a Fourth Amendment illegality does not require exclusion of evidence

unearthed from independent sources). 

To the extent Ali contends that the independent source doctrine should not

apply to immigration proceedings because it would allow the alleged violations of

his constitutional rights to go “unpunished,” this argument is unpersuasive. See

Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 443 (1984) (the purpose of the exclusionary rule is

to “put the [government actors] in the same, not a worse, position that they would

have been in if no . . . misconduct had occurred”) (emphasis in original).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1775 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to 

fraudulent representations about having received military 

decorations or medals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1775 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stolen Valor Act of 

3 2012’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT 

5 OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 704 of title 18, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘wears,’’; and 

9 (2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows: 

10 ‘‘(b) FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RE11 CEIPT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.—Who12 ever, with intent to obtain money, property, or other tan13 gible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a recipi14 ent of a decoration or medal described in subsection (c)(2) 

15 or (d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more 

16 than one year, or both.’’. 

17 (b) ADDITION OF CERTAIN OTHER MEDALS.—Sec18 tion 704(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

19 (1) by striking ‘‘If a decoration’’ and inserting 

20 the following: 

21 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a decoration’’; 

22 (2) by inserting ‘‘a combat badge,’’ after ‘‘1129 

23 of title 10,’’; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(2) COMBAT BADGE DEFINED.—In this sub26 section, the term ‘combat badge’ means a Combat 
3 

•HR 1775 EH

1 Infantryman’s Badge, Combat Action Badge, Com2 bat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or Com3 bat Action Medal.’’. 

4 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 704 of title 

5 18, United States Code, is amended in each of subsections 

6 (c)(1) and (d) by striking ‘‘or (b)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1775 

AN ACT 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with rereceived military decorations or medals. spect to fraudulent representations about having
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 13271]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control

31 CFR Part 591


Publication of Venezuela Sanctions Regulations Web General 
License 5N

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Publication of web general license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing one general license (GL) issued pursuant 
to the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations: GL 5N, which was previously 
made available on OFAC's website.

DATES: GL 5N was issued on January 16, 2024. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION for additional relevant dates.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Assistant Director for 
Licensing, 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, 
202-622-4855; or Assistant Director for Compliance, 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    This document and additional information concerning OFAC are 
available on OFAC's website: https://ofac.treasury.gov.

Background

    On January 16, 2024, OFAC issued GL 5N to authorize certain 
transactions otherwise prohibited by the Venezuela Sanctions 
Regulations (VSR), 31 CFR part 591. The GL was made available on OFAC's 
website (https://ofac.treasury.gov) when it was issued. GL 5N 
supersedes GL 5M, which was issued on October 18, 2023. The text of GL 
5N is provided below.

OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL

Venezuela Sanctions Regulations

31 CFR Part 591

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 5N

Authorizing Certain Transactions Related to the Petr[oacute]leos de 
Venezuela, S.A. 2020 8.5 Percent Bond on or After April 16, 2024

    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this general license, on 
or after April 16, 2024, all transactions related to, the provision of 
financing for, and other dealings in the Petr[oacute]leos de Venezuela, 
S.A. 2020 8.5 Percent Bond that would be prohibited by subsection 
l(a)(iii) of Executive Order (E.O.) 13835 of May 21, 2018, as amended 
by E.O. 13857 of January 25, 2019, and incorporated into the Venezuela 
Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 591 (the VSR), are authorized.
    (b) This general license does not authorize any transactions or 
activities otherwise prohibited by the VSR, or any other part of 31 CFR 
chapter V.
    (c) Effective January 16, 2024, General License No. 5M, dated 
October 18, 2023, is replaced and superseded in its entirety by this 
General License No. 5N.

Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
    Dated: January 16, 2024.
Bradley T. Smith,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.
[FR Doc. 2024-03626 Filed 2-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P