alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 12871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03412]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Proposal Review Panel for Materials 
Research--Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) 
Site Visit University of California, San Diego (DMR) (#1203)
    Date and Time: May 23, 2024; 7:30 a.m.-6:45 p.m.; May 24, 2024; 
8:00 a.m.-3:45 p.m.
    Place: University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La 
Jolla, CA 92093.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Cosima Boswell-Koller, Program Director, 
National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 
22314; Telephone: 703-292-4959.
    Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to conduct a review during year 
4 of the award period as stipulated in the cooperative agreement.
    Agenda: To conduct an in depth evaluation of performance, to assess 
progress towards goals, and to provide recommendations.

Thursday, May 23, 2024

7:30 a.m.-12:05 p.m. Executive Sessions (Closed)
12:05 p.m.-1:00 p.m. Lunch (Open)
1:00 p.m.-2:30 p.m. Executive Sessions (Closed)
2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m. Facilities Overview and Lab Tour (Closed)
3:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m. Poster Session (Open)
5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Executive Sessions (Closed)

Friday, May 24, 2024

8:00 a.m.-3:45 p.m. Executive Sessions (Closed)

    Reason for Closing: The program being reviewed during the sitve 
visit will include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
program. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 14, 2024.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-03412 Filed 2-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, Bruce E. Thomas, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 14, 2003
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Arthur H. Berman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IDS Life Insurance
     Company;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
     directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


Date:  March 29, 2004


   /s/ Arthur H. Berman
   --------------------------
Name:  Arthur H. Berman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Cognigen  Networks,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary L.
Cook,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  the  Company,   certify,  pursuant  to  18
U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ Gary L./ Cook
                                    Gary L. Cook
                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                    September 29, 2003
```
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                 Exhibit 4.12(a)

                LIST OF SHAREHOLDERS OF VIS AND SOED WHO ENTERED
                        INTO THE FORM OF ESCROW AGREEMENT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
          VIS SHAREHOLDERS                     SOED SHAREHOLDERS
          ----------------                     -----------------
<S>                                     <C>
3i Group plc                            Christiann Richard David van der Kuyl
Avanti Capital plc                      Patrick Burns
Peter Baillie                           Peter Baillie
Bamboo Investments plc                  John Boyle
John Boyle                              Alexander Gordon Catto
David Brock                             Brendon Clouston
James Bryan                             Coppertop Concepts Limited
Patrick Bums                            Lord Catto's Settlement of November 1976
Alexander Gordon Catto                  Noble Grossart Investments Limited
Innes Gordon & Alexander Gordon         AB Services
Catto (as trustees of Lord Catto's
settlement of November 1976)
The Estate of the Late Lord Catto       David Brock
Paul Chestnutt                          Paul Chestnutt
Brendon Clouston                        John Fickling
John Fickling                           Five Oceans Foundation
Flextech Television Limited             Andrew Fraser
Timothy Gatland                         Jonathan Horne
Martin Gibson                           Anthony Kennan
Robert Graham                           Northern Edge Limited
Margaret Harrison                       Carl Openshaw
Terry & Margaret Harrison               Linda Reid
Jonathan Horne                          Ian Cleland Ritchie
Colin Ingleby Mackenzic                 William Martin Ritchie
Scottish Enterprise                     Simon Rogers
Scottish Equity Partnership             Scottish Enterprise
David Semple                            Julian Summer
TBI Financial Services                  TBI Financial Services Limited
TC Nominees (Nol) Limited               The Hamilton Portfolio Investments Limited

Trustees of the Dawn Harrison
Interest in Possession Settlement
Trustees of the Kay Aitkin Interest
in Possession Settlement
Anthony Kennan
Christiaan R D van der Kuyl
Ran Meinertzhagen
Eric Reed
Mark Aaron Reid
</TABLE>
#### Victor Rios SALAZAR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27415.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 9, 1955.

*113Paul Andow, Joseph J. Rey, El Paso, for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for drunken driving, with punishment assessed at a $50 fine and three days in jail.

The American half of the international bridge connecting the city of Juarez in the Republic of Mexico and the city of El Paso, Texas, in the United States, is a toll bridge and is used by the public as well as transportation companies as a public highway and thoroughfare. A toll fee is charged for such use.

The evidence is that appellant drove his automobile, while intoxicated, across the bridge from Juarez, Mexico, and after he had crossed the boundary line into the United States, and the city of El Paso, was arrested and taken into custody before leaving the bridge.

The appeal is predicated upon two propositions.

It is insisted that the proof failed to show that the city of El Paso is an incorporated city, as alleged in the information.

The charter of the city of El Paso is on file in the office of the Secretary of State of this state. This court takes judicial knowledge of that fact and therefore that it is an incorporated city. Fuller v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 310, 32 S.W.2d 358; Farmer v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 212, 43 S.W.2d 588.

The other proposition is that the bridge was not a public road or highway within the meaning of the statute, art. 802, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., prohibiting the driving and operation of motor vehicles while intoxicated.

The bridge was open to the use of and at the time was being used by the public in general as a highway and thoroughfare. We deem this sufficient to constitute the bridge a public road within the statute prohibiting drunken driving. Wood v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 352, 45 S.W.2d 599. Moreover, the general and accepted rule appears to be that a toll road or turnpike is a public highway within the meaning of statutes regulating the driving and operation of motor vehicles thereon. 54 Am.Jur., Turnpikes and Toll Roads, Sec. 3, p. 495.

We are constrained to conclude that the facts support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OE L VA L DE Z - C AS T R O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 09- 50101 D. C. No . 3 : 0 7 - CR - 0 2 6 6 8 - RT B ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R oge rT . B e ni t e z , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an dG R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J oe l V a l de z - C a s tr o appe a l s f r om the 51- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng h is g u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rb e in g ad e p o rte da lie n f o u n din th e U n ite dS ta te s , in vi ol a t i on of

8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291, a nd w e a f f irm . 

# FI LED AU G 02 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50101 2 V a ld e z - C a s tr o c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e db yd e te rm in in g th a t h is pri or conv i ct i on for a ss aul tw i th a fi re arm , i n v i ol at i on of C al i forni a P enalC od e § 2 4 5 (a)(2 ), co n st i tu t eda cri m e o f v i o l en ce u n d er U . S . S . G . § 2 L 1 . 2 , b ecau se sect i o n 2 4 5 (a)(2 ) d o es n o tco n t ai n th e req u i si t e i n t en to r u se o f fo rce. T h ese c o n te n tio n s a r e f

o r e c lo s e d . Se e U

ni te d States v . G raj e da , 581 F . 3d 1186, 1191- 97 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ; see a l

so U ni te d States v . H

e r on- Sal i nas , 5 6 6 F .3 d8 9 8 , 8 9 9 ( 9 th C i r. 20 09 ). V a ld e z - C a s tr o a ls o c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s tan tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le . T he di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notpr oc e dur a l l ye rra nd, i n l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the circ u m stan ce s a n dth e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 (a ) s en ten cin g fa cto rs , V ald ez -C as tro ’s s e n te n c e is s u b s tan tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e U n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d 984, 993 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en banc). AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.2

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard S. Dziadzio, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/  Richard S. Dziadzio
                                  ------------------------
                                  Richard S. Dziadzio
                                  Senior Executive Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 10, 2010
#### Vivian BLISH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28626.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 28, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

. Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for unlawfully passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, five years.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
---

|EXHIBIT 32.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER                  
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer of AMG
Oil Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AMG Oil Ltd. for the
period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 13, 2007

| | /s/Michael Hart                       | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer | 

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1649 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1649

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2011

 Mr. Sarbanes (for himself, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mr. Moran) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 502 of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 
461 note; Public Law 105-312) is amended by striking subsection (c) and 
inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### O. R. CAMPBELL v. STATE.

No. 29514.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1958.

H. M. Bellinger, San Antonio, for appellant.

Hubert W. Green, Jr., Dist. Atty., K. Key Hoffman, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*742BELCHER, Commissioner.

The convictions are under four counts in the information charging the delivery of beer to four named minors by a licensed retail dealer. The punishment was assessed at three months in jail on each count which were ordered by the court to run concurrently.

The disposition of this case is controlled by our opinion in Campbell v. State, 310 S.W.2d 740, and which is hereby referred to.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 5th day of August, 2003.




                                                   /s/ Albert R. Rietheimer
                                                   ------------------------
                                                       Albert R. Rietheimer
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                              and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp
Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

WILLIAM HERNANDEZ AKA SAMUEL 

LOPEZ, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 85 EM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2014, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.