alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20211

Conference Calendar

RAY ALLEN DRGAC

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

OWEN MURRAY, Director

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CV-554

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ray Allen Drgac, Texas prisoner # 721604, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint against Owen Murray, director of the University of Texas Medical

Branch (UTMB). Drgac alleged that he suffers from tinnitus and that the

medical staff at the Ellis Unit had failed to provide him with adequate medical

care. He thus argued that they had shown deliberate indifference to his serious

medical need. The district court dismissed Drgac’s complaint pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A as frivolous and for failure to state a claim.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 10, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-20211

2

On appeal, Drgac reiterates his argument that, despite his receipt of

antibiotic ear drops and other medicines, he was nottreated for tinnitus because

the medicines he was given were not made specifically to treat that condition.

He seeks to have this court order UTMB to furnish him with one of several

medications that he thinks would work better than those he had been given. He

also seeks to have this court order UTMB to recommend a medical transfer to

a quieter prison unit and cell location. He prays for this relief despite the

opinion of the Ellis Unit medical staff that such relief was not indicated.

We review the district court’s dismissal de novo. See Ruiz v. UnitedStates,

160 F.3d 273, 275 (5th Cir. 1998). Drgac failed to state a claim against the only

named defendant by failing to allege any personal involvement by the defendant

and by failing to attribute the constitutional violation he alleges to any policy

implemented by the defendant. See Thompkins v. Belt, 828 F.2d 298, 304 (5th

Cir. 1987); Thompson v. Steele, 709 F.2d 381, 382 (5th Cir. 1983). Further,

Drgac’s deliberate-indifference arguments are premised upon his disagreement

with the treatment deemed appropriate by the Ellis Unit medical staff. He has

thus failed to state a constitutional claim. See Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d

320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Drgac has

moved for the appointment of counsel, and that motion is DENIED. The district

court’s dismissal of Drgac’s complaint counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996).

Drgac is WARNED thatif he accumulates three strikes, he will not be permitted

to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).
Located at:

http://www.netl.doe.gov/about/index.html
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SS.1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Century  Park  Pictures  Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-KSB  (Report)  for the year ended  September  30, 2004,  as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof. I, Thomas
K. Scallen, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Thomas K. Scallen
----------------------------
Thomas K. Scallen
Chief Executive and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 2, 2004
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                     OF

                          ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                                     OF

                         EURO TECHNOLOGY OUTFITTERS




     I,   the   undersigned  President  and  Secretary  of  EURO   TECHNOLOGY

OUTFITTERS, do hereby certify that:

     The  Board of Directors of said Corporation, by majority consent of  the

directors  on  August 1, 2002, adopted a resolution to amend  Article  I  and

Article VI, of the original Articles as follows:

                              Article I - NAME

The exact name of this Corporation is:

                          PETROL OIL AND GAS, INC.

                         Article VI - CAPITAL STOCK

     Section  1.Authorized  Shares.  The total number  of  shares  that  this

corporation is authorized to issue is 100,000,000 shares of Common  Stock  of

$.001  par value and 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock of $.001 par value.

The  authority of the Corporation to issue non-voting convertible and/or non-

voting  non-convertible preferred shares together with additional classes  of

shares  may  be  limited  by  resolution of the Board  of  Directors  of  the

Corporation.  Preferred shares and additional classes of shares may be issued

from  time  to  time as the Board of Directors may determine  in  their  sole

judgment and without the necessity of action by the holders of Shares.

<PAGE>

     The number of shares of the corporation outstanding and entitled to vote

on  an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is 6,476,240; that the said

changes  and  amendments have been consented to and approved by  a  unanimous

consent of the stockholders holding 100% of stock outstanding and entitled to

vote thereon on August 1, 2002.

     Dated: August 20, 2002
                              /s/ Anthony DeMint
                              ____________________________________
                              ANTHONY N. DeMINT, President

                              /s/ Anthony DeMint
                              _____________________________________
                              ANTHONY N. DeMINT, Secretary



STATE OF NEVADA     )
                    )  SS:
COUNTY OF CLARK     )

     On  August  20,  2002, personally appeared before me, a  Notary  Public,
ANTHONY  N.  DeMINT,  who is the President and Secretary of  Euro  Technology
Outfitters  and who acknowledged to me that he executed the above  instrument
on behalf of the Corporation.

                              /s/ Debra Amigone
                              _____________________________________
                              NOTARY PUBLIC
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC
MERCANTILE BANCORP

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the
Quarter ended June 30, 2006

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the
Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this
Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ NANCY A. GRAY                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|                     |  |  |  | Nancy A. Gray, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                     |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission on its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1   Wings & Things, Inc.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date: August 9, 2007 /s/ Linda L. Perry Linda L. Perry Principal Executive officer Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Minn Shares Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Greyton Becker, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Greyton BeckerGreyton BeckerPrincipal Financial OfficerMarch 28, 2011
DENY and Opinion Filed January 7, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-01142-CV

IN RE MINH T. NGUYEN AND THAO THIEN, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-04280-2020

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Myers

In this original proceeding, relators seek a writ of injunction preventing 

enforcement of the homeowners association’s prohibition against short-term rentals 

pending resolution of their appeal from the final judgment declaring that the 

prohibition is valid and enforceable. Also before the Court is relator’s motion to 

enforce the supersedeas order, and, in the alternative, seek temporary relief that 

would have the effect of preventing the homeowners association’s enforcement of 

the prohibition against short-term rentals pending resolution of the original 

proceeding and appeal. We deny the petition for writ of injunction, deny the motion 

to enforce the supersedeas order, and deny the request for temporary relief.
–2–

“Each court of appeals . . . may issue . . . all . . . writs necessary to enforce 

the jurisdiction of the court.” TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(a). A court of appeals does 

not have “original jurisdiction to grant writs of injunction, except to protect its 

jurisdiction over the subject matter of a pending appeal, or to prevent an unlawful 

interference with the enforcement of its judgments and decrees.” In re Torres, No. 

05-18-00774-CV, 2018 WL 4784580, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 4, 2018, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.) (quoting Ott v. Bell, 606 S.W.2d 955, 957 (Tex. App.—

Waco 1980, no writ)). “The threat of jurisdictional interference must be real; the writ 

will not issue to prevent the mere possibility of interference.” In re Blackard, No. 

05-16-00470-CV, 2016 WL 1756843, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 29, 2016, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.). Based on the record before us, we conclude that relators 

have failed to demonstrate their entitlement to a writ of injunction. 

We also deny the motion to enforce the supersedeas order. After reviewing 

the record, we conclude that superseding the final judgment does not have the effect 

of granting injunctive relief to prevent the homeowners association from enforcing 

its prohibition against short-term rentals. See In re 2999 TC Acquisitions, LLC, No. 

05-20-00777-CV, 2020 WL 6696369 (Tex. App.—Dallas Nov. 13, 2020, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op.) (superseding denial of temporary injunction would not have 

the effect of granting injunctive relief).

Finally, we deny the request for temporary relief. Based on the record before 

us, we conclude that relators have failed to show their entitlement to such relief.
–3–

211142f.p05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
**Exhibit31.1**

 

# **Certifications**

 

I, Richard A. Smith, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Eschelon Telecom, Inc.,

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of a annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s control over financial reporting.

 

 

 
|   | November 10, 2004 |
|--------|-------------------|
|   |              |   |
|   | Sign:             | /s/ Richard A. Smith |
|   |              | Richard A. Smith |
|   |              | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

 

----
# Diario Oficial L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0685 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | L 66 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Legislación | 61.° año8 de marzo de 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0685

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

L 66

Edición en lengua española

Legislación

61.° año8 de marzo de 2018

---

| Sumario | | Corrección de errores | Página |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrección de errores del Reglamento (UE) 2018/302 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 28 de febrero de 2018, sobre medidas destinadas a impedir el bloqueo geográfico injustificado y otras formas de discriminación por razón de la nacionalidad, del lugar de residencia o del lugar de establecimiento de los clientes en el mercado interior y por el que se modifican los Reglamentos (CE) n.o 2006/2004 y (UE) 2017/2394 y la Directiva 2009/22/CE ( DO L 60 I de 2.3.2018 ) | 1 |

Sumario

Corrección de errores

Página

*

Corrección de errores del Reglamento (UE) 2018/302 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 28 de febrero de 2018, sobre medidas destinadas a impedir el bloqueo geográfico injustificado y otras formas de discriminación por razón de la nacionalidad, del lugar de residencia o del lugar de establecimiento de los clientes en el mercado interior y por el que se modifican los Reglamentos (CE) n.o 2006/2004 y (UE) 2017/2394 y la Directiva 2009/22/CE ( DO L 60 I de 2.3.2018 )

o

( DO L 60 I de 2.3.2018 )

1

| ES | Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres finos son actos de gestión corriente, adoptados en el marco de la política agraria, y que tienen generalmente un período de validez limitado.
  Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres gruesos y precedidos de un asterisco son todos los demás actos. |
| --- | --- |

ES

Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres finos son actos de gestión corriente, adoptados en el marco de la política agraria, y que tienen generalmente un período de validez limitado.

Los actos cuyos títulos van impresos en caracteres gruesos y precedidos de un asterisco son todos los demás actos.

---

Corrección de errores

| 8.3.2018 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

L 66/1

---

Corrección de errores del Reglamento (UE) 2018/302 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 28 de febrero de 2018, sobre medidas destinadas a impedir el bloqueo geográfico injustificado y otras formas de discriminación por razón de la nacionalidad, del lugar de residencia o del lugar de establecimiento de los clientes en el mercado interior y por el que se modifican los Reglamentos (CE) n.o 2006/2004 y (UE) 2017/2394 y la Directiva 2009/22/CE

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L 60 I de 2 de marzo de 2018
  )

En la página 14, en la firma:

donde dice:

«
  Por el Parlamento Europeo

La Presidenta

L. PAVLOVA

Por el Consejo

El Presidente

A. TAJANI
  »,

debe decir:

«
  Por el Parlamento Europeo

El Presidente

A. TAJANI

Por el Consejo

La Presidenta

L. PAVLOVA
  ».

---
Exhibit 32.1


                       Wings & Things, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. (the "Company")
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

a.    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.    the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                            /s/ Linda L. Perry
Date: August 8, 2006        ___________________________________
                            Linda L. Perry
                            Principal Executive officer
                            Principal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
        32**
  **CERTIFICATION
          PURSUANT TO**
 **18
          U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
          ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
          906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        David
        A. Gestetner, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), President
        and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
        of the
        Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
   By:
                  /s/ David A. Gestetner
              
              President,
                  Chief Executive Officer and
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
              
              December
                  19, 2005David
                  A. Gestetner
              
              (Principal
                  Executive Officer and Principal
                Financial
                  and Accounting Officer )
Order entered October 31 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00952
- CV
IN RE DARLA JALANE E DDINS, Relator
O rigina l Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 13
- 23371



### O RDER Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT relator’s motion to dismiss and
DISMISS this original proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42 .1(a)(1). We ORDER relator to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.
/s/ JASON BOATRIGHT JUSTICE
#### Brooks ESTES v. STATE.

No. 28601.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 10, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

This is a conviction for the offense of burglary, with punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Appellant has filed his affidavit stating that he desires to have his appeal in this case dismissed.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
#### Bennie Buial NELMS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28029.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, with a prior conviction; the punishment, 2 years and 6 months in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be' regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.