alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries Unaudited Condensed Financial
Statements as of and for September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000007431
<NAME> ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              34
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      527
<ALLOWANCES>                                        47
<INVENTORY>                                        430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,083
<PP&E>                                           2,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              799
<BONDS>                                          1,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           228
<OTHER-SE>                                         503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,032
<SALES>                                          2,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,444
<CGS>                                            1,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    11
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (4)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     116
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       113
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
|                                                             |   |                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
| Name                                                             |   | Percentage      Owned |
|                                                             |   |                  |   |
| Apollo      Solar Energy, Inc.                                   |   |                  | 100    | % |
| Sichuan      Apollo Solar Science & Technology Co., Ltd      |   |                  | 100    | %       (Owned by Apollo Solar Energy, Inc.) |
| Sichuan      Xinlong Telurium Industry & Technology Co., Ltd |   |                  | 100    | %       (Owned by Sichuan Apollo Solar Science & Technology Co.,  Ltd) |
| Sichuan      Shimian Dadu River Mining & Metallurgy Co., Ltd |   |                  | 100    | %       (Owned by Sichuan Xinlong Telurium Industry & Technology Co.,      Ltd) |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1791 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1791

  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
                Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2011

    Mr. Rooney (for himself, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Miller of 
 Florida, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Nugent, Mr. Webster, 
 Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Young of Florida, Mr. Buchanan, Mr. Posey, Ms. Ros-
Lehtinen, Mr. Deutch, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Diaz-Balart, Mr. West, 
 and Mr. Rivera) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
           the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 
South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ``Alto Lee 
                Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse under construction at 101 South United 
States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Alto Lee Adams, 
Sr., United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
# SERVED APRI L14 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S : h WASHINGTON , D C
I N TH EMATTE RO F AI REVAC , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CPlOCEOOOl (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2010-002 2

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designate da s Cas e No
. 2007CE030026 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Richar dC
. Goodwin
. Al l future pleading s an d othe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List
.

Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t lormi e A : Yof

Chie f Administrativ e Law/^dg eFA A Docke t No
. CPlOCEOOO

l (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 20591 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-4 3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Mr
. Coli n Collins , Presiden t an dCE O Ai r Eva c EMS , Inc. , Responden t P.O
. Bo x 768-30 6 Davi s Driv e Wes t Plains , M O 6577 5 Jame s E
. Ramsey , Respondent' s Counse l Coolin g & Herber s P.C
. 240 0 City Cente r

Squar e 110 0 Mai n Stree t Kansa s City , M O 6410 5 TEL : 816-474-077 7 FAX : 816-472-079 0 Mar k G
. Camacho , Complainant' s Counse l Senio r Enforcemen t

Attorne y Central Region , ACE- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n DO T Buildin g 90 1 Locust , Roo m50 6 Kansa s City , M O 64106-264 1 TEL : 816-329-376 5 FAX : 816-329-377 1 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e was by U.S
. Mail
. Fo r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e th e following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , DC 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Genaissance Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned, Kevin Rakin, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)  the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                                     | /s/ Kevin Rakin         |   |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
| Date:    May 5, 2005 | Kevin Rakin             |
|                                     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 24Certified Power of Attorney

CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

I
am the duly qualified and acting Secretary of 4-D Neuroimaging, a California corporation (the "Corporation").

The
following is a true copy of a Unanimous Written Consent duly adopted by the Board of Directors on December 5, 2002, which appears in the minute book of the Corporation:



Such
resolution has not subsequently been amended, modified or revoked and as of the date of this Certificate is in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate of Secretary as of December 20, 2002.

| |  |                                                      
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                      
| |  |                                                      
| |  |                                                      
| |  | /s/EUGENE C. HIRSCHKOFFEugene C. Hirschkoff,Secretary

---

QuickLinks
Open Literature Review Summary

Chemical Name: Atrazine

CAS No: 1912-24-9

PC Code: 080803

ECOTOX Record Number and Citation: Prosser, R.; Andrus, J.; Solomon, K.; et al. (201 5) Assessing Temporal and Spatial Variation in Sensitivity of Communities of Periphyton Sa mpled from Agroecosystem to, and Ability to Recover from, Atrazine Exposure. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 118. 204-216. MRID

49639107

Date of Review: March 1, 2016

- This research article examined the variation in community sensitivity and potential recovery of field collected periphyton comm unities after 48-hr exposures to atrazine under laboratory conditions.

- The study sites were selected from a few of the AEEMP monitoring program and that have been the subject of study in other studies (Andrus et al. 2013; Andrus et al

. 2015).

Description of Use in Document (QUAL, QUAN, INV): QUAL

Rationale for Use: This study was briefly reviewed to evaluate if it: 1) Produced more sensitive endpoints that th ose used in the 2016 USEPA Atrazine Preliminary Risk Assessment for atrazine. 2) Provided information to refine the assessm ent with regard to community effects of

atrazine.

The reviewer concluded, while the study provides an investigation and discussion of atrazine effects on periphyton communities, it did not identify more sensitive endpoints, and did not contribute information that would change th e conclusions of the 2016 assessment.

Limitations: This study was not fully reviewed for sc ientific or regulatory limitations.

Primary Reviewer: Frank T. Farruggia Ph.D., EPA/OCSPP/OPP/EFED/ERB3

Digitally signed by FRANK FARRUGGIA DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=USEPA, ou=Staff, cn=FRANK FARRUGGIA, dnQualifier=0000048865
Date: 2016.04.14 08:14:48 -04'00'
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1644 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1644

   To amend section 412(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
prohibit the provision of cash assistance or medical assistance to any 
  refugee who, after entering the United States, travels to a country 
                 that supports international terrorism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2011

  Mr. Rivera introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 412(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
prohibit the provision of cash assistance or medical assistance to any 
  refugee who, after entering the United States, travels to a country 
                 that supports international terrorism.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ASSISTANCE TO REFUGEES.

    Section 412(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1522(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(9) No cash assistance or medical assistance may be provided 
under this subsection to any refugee who, after entering the United 
States, travels to a country the government of which the Secretary of 
State has determined has repeatedly provided support for acts of 
international terrorism pursuant to section 6(j) of the Export 
Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), section 620A of 
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371), or section 40 of 
the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2781).''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed August 8, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00612-CR

____________

DOMINGO TAJIBOY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 5658

ORDER

This is an appeal from a municipal court conviction for a Transportation Code 

offense. The conviction was appealed to the County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 

from the Municipal Court of Record No. 7. In its opinion, the County Criminal Court 

at Law No. 4 referenced testimony during the municipal court trial. The record in 

this court does not contain a reporter’s record from the municipal court trial.
2

The district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a 

copy of the reporter’s record of the trial in Municipal Court Case No. 2014 TR 

0240581 on or before August 29, 2019.

If the record is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the record is not a 

part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

.
#### Don Cody BATTLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 37980.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 17, 1965.

*900Fred Time, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Malcolm Dade, Howard Weinberger and W. John Allison, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is felony theft; the punishment, four years.

The injured party testified that he awoke in the middle of the night and observed a dump truck without any lights shining pull out of the alley in back of the apartment house where he resided, that he called the police, got in one of his automobiles and pursued the truck until the police brought it to a halt, and that in the back of the truck he found four expensive hub cabs valued at $27.50 each that had come from his Buick automobile.

- Officer Woodrow testified that he stopped the dump truck which was traveling without lights in the middle of the night, that shortly thereafter the injured party arrived upon the scene and identified his hub caps from among others in the back of the truck, and that he then arrested appellant and his companion.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, admitted his guilt as he had in his plea of guilty and stated that he stole the hub caps while his companion served as “the lookout”, and that they intended to sell them.

The sole question presented on appeal is whether or not appellant should have been allowed to have Counselor Time enter the case and represent him at trial. The record on the motion for new trial reflects that the indictment against appellant was returned on May 4, 1964. The case was originally set for trial on May 21, but at such time Honorable Edgar Smith, a member of the Bar, informed the court that he represented appellant, and the case was reset for September 2, at which time it was passed until September 10, when the case went to trial with Edgar Smith representing appellant. While it is true that Attorney Time, at the hearing on the motion for new trial, developed from the prosecutor the fact that he had approached him on September 10, with a request that the case be passed so that he might sit in and participate in appellant’s defense, there is no showing that Attorney Time made any request to the court that the case be passed or continued, and no motion for continuance appears in the record.

In order to preserve any error, it is incumbent upon appellant to secure a ruling from the court. Yaffar v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 341, 349 S.W.2d 730, and 5 Tex.Juris.2d, p. 47.

Finding the evidence sufficient to support the conviction and no reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

RONALD DOUGLAS JANDA,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 202 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### Bascom GILES v. STATE.

No. 27978.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 18, 1956.

Small, Small, & Craig, Rogan B. Giles, Austin, for appellant. , :

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin,for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Accomplice to theft over fifty dollars is the offense; the punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

Appellant has now filed his personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 3.1(b)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                       OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                                 CORTECH, INC.



     Cortech,  Inc., a  corporation  organized  and  existing  under the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the  "Corporation"),  hereby certifies
as follows:

     FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Cortech, Inc.

     SECOND: Article V, Section 1, of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby
amended in its entirety to read as follows:

               "Section 1. Authorized  Shares. The aggregate number of
          shares of capital  stock which this  Corporation  shall have
          the authority to issue shall be 7,000,000 shares,  5,000,000
          of which  shall be Common  Stock,  with a par value of $.002
          per share (hereinafter  referred to as "Common Stock"),  and
          2,000,000  of which  shall be  Preferred  Stock,  with a par
          value  of  $.002  per  share  (hereinafter  referred  to  as
          "Preferred   Stock").   On  the   effective   date  of  this
          Certificate of Amendment,  the number of outstanding  shares
          of Common Stock of the Corporation  shall be reduced so that
          each ten (10) shares of Common Stock issued and  outstanding
          will be automatically reclassified,  combined, and converted
          into one (1) share of Common  Stock.  No fractions of shares
          will  be  issued,   and  on  the  effective   time  of  this
          Certificate of Amendment, stockholders otherwise entitled to
          receive fractions of shares, unless and until such fractions
          of  shares  are  combined  with  other  fractions  of shares
          resulting  in full shares  within a period of time to be set
          by the  Corporation's  Board  of  Directors,  shall  have no
          further  interest  as  a  stockholder  in  respect  of  such
          fractions  of shares and shall be entitled  to receive  from
          the Corporation in cash the fair value, as determined by the
          Board of Directors, of such fractions of shares."


     THIRD:  The  foregoing  Certificate  of  Amendment  to the  Certificate  of
Incorporation of the Corporation shall be effective at 7:00 p.m., Delaware time,
on September 22, 1998.

     FOURTH:  The  foregoing  Certificate  of  Amendment to the  Certificate  of
Incorporation of the Corporation has been duly adopted by the Board of Directors
and the  stockholders  of the  Corporation in accordance  with the provisions of
Sections  141,  211 and  242 of the  General  Corporation  Law of the  State  of
Delaware.



<PAGE>



     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Corporation  has  caused  this  Certificate  of
Amendment to be executed by Diarmuid Boran,  its Chief Operating  Officer,  this
21st day of September, 1998.

                                    CORTECH, INC.



                                    By:  /s/  Diarmuid Boran                   
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Diarmuid Boran, Chief Operating Officer
EXHIBIT 32

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


Exhibit 32

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Jointland  Development,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Kexi Xu,
Chief  Executive  Office  and Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 USC section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 14, 2007

/s/ Kexi Xu
---------------------
Kexi Xu,
CEO and Acting Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.