alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-10-0251-CR 

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

 AT AMARILLO 

 PANEL B 

 OCTOBER 4, 2010 

 ______________________________ 

 JULIE MARIE ST. CLAIR, 

Appellant 

 v. 

 THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee 

 _________________________________ 

 FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; 

NO. 58,965-B; HON. JOHN BOARD., PRESIDING 

_______________________________ 

Abatement and Remand

_______________________________ 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. 

 Pending before us is a joint motion to abate the appeal and remand the matter 

back to the trial court so that findings of fact and conclusions of law can be filed. The 

record reflects that appellant, timely, filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions 

of law. However, none were ever filed. In State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2006), the Court of Criminal Appeals held that, "[u]pon the request of the 

losing party on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court shall state its essential 
2 

findings." In Cullen, the Court explained that, the trial court's refusal to state its findings 

and conclusions prevented the court of appeals from a meaningful review of the 

decision to grant or deny the motion to suppress. Id. at 698. 

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the matter back to the trial court. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.4. We further direct the Honorable John Board, judge of the 

181st Judicial District Court, Potter County, Texas, to execute findings of fact and 

conclusions of law in this cause as required by State v. Cullen, supra. We also direct 

him to execute his findings and conclusions and file them with the clerk of this court, via 

a supplemental clerk's record, on or before November 3, 2010. Upon the filing of the 

supplemental clerk's record containing the findings and conclusions, the appeal will be 

reinstated. 

It is so ordered. 

Per Curiam
#### State, ex rel. Russell, Gdn., Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.

(No. 27448

Decided May 31, 1939.)

*Messrs. Woolley S Rowland, Mr. R. N. Larrimer*and *Mr. Mark E. Moore,*for appellee.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. Felker,*for appellant.

Jouenal Entey. This cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of the record of the Court of Appeals of Franklin county and was argued by counsel, and it appearing to the court that said cause originated in the Court of Appeals and was referred to a referee who made findings of facts and conclusions of law, which findings and conclusions were approved and confirmed, by said Court of Appeals, and judgment rendered in favor of the appellee; and it further appearing that no bill of exceptions was signed and allowed disclosing the evidence upon which the report of the referee and the judgment of the Court of Appeals wasi based, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be and the same hereby is affirmed for want of an adequate record.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmeeman, Williams, Myees, Matthias and Haet, JJ., concur.
TS-AMID10/20/40

Attachment #10

Pt. 2, Sec. B 

Additional Information on the Absence of Water Releases during Manufacture, 

Processing, and End Use 
TS-AMID10/20/40
Exhibit 31.2  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION  I, Linda L. Perry, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wings & Things, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.  4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date: November 8, 2007/s/ Linda L. Perry
Linda L. Perry
Principal Financial Officer
SERVED MARCH 9, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYDIVE KENTUCKY LLC, 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09CEOOO4 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2009-1047 

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE'S ORDER 

POSTPONING HEARING 

Complainant has submitted a motion to continue the hearing, now 

scheduled to take place on May 4, 2010. 

In support of the motion. Complainant says that Federal Aviation 

Administration attorneys who handle personnel litigation, including her, are 

required to attend a conference during the week of May 3-7. Complainant 

requests that the hearing be re-scheduled for a date after June 7, 2010. 

In consideration of the foregoing, and for good cause shown, the 

motion to continue the hearing is granted. The date of the hearing is 

postponedto June 9, 2010. It will be held in Louisville, Kentucky. The 

exact location and place of the hearing will be announced in a notice to be 

issued in the future. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 
FAA Docket No. CP09CE0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL i& ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building -Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Allen K. Gailor, Respondent's Counsel 

The Gailor Law Office, PLLC 

100 Professional Arts Building 

730 West Market Street 

Louisville, Kentucky 40202 

TEL: 502-584-7217 

FAX: 502-584-4848 

Taneesha D. Marshall, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following 

address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearmg Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.03

                CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO RESTATED CERTIFICATE
            OF INCORPORATION OF SHEARSON/LEHMAN AMERICAN EXPRESS INC.



            SHEARSON LEHMAN/AMERICAN EXPRESS INC., a Delaware corporation having
its registered office at Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, in the
City of Wilmington, in the County of New Castle (the "Corporation"), hereby
certifies to the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware that:

            FIRST:  Article I of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
the Corporation is hereby amended so as to read in its entirety as follows:

                                      "Name

            The name of the corporation (hereinafter referred to as the
'Corporation') is:

                          SHEARSON LEHMAN BROTHERS INC"

            SECOND: The Board of Directors of the Corporation by requisite vote
adopted a resolution which set forth the foregoing amendment to the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, in accordance with Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, declaring that the amendment to the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation as proposed was advisable and directing
that it be submitted for action thereon by the sole stockholder of the
Corporation.

            THIRD: The amendment has been consented to and authorized and
approved by the holder of all the issued and outstanding stock of the
Corporation, entitled to vote, by a written consent given in accordance with the
provisions of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.


<Page>



            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Shearson Lehman/American Express Inc. has caused
this Certificate to be signed on this 6th day of March, 1985 in its name and on
its behalf by its Chairman of the Board and attested by its Secretary or an
Assistant Secretary, pursuant to Section 103(a) of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware.

                                              /s/ Peter A. Cohen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                  Peter A. Cohen
                                               Chairman of the Board


ATTEST:  /s/ Barbara C. Kullen
        ------------------------------
         Secretary



                                      -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
GOES HERE
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          84,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  253,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               430,658
<PP&E>                                         231,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,001,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          497,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,828
<OTHER-SE>                                     457,197
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,001,443
<SALES>                                         64,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           45,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,271,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,208,108)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,208,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
Amendment No.1 to Amended and Restated License Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.17 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED LICENSE AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to that certain Amended and Restated License Agreement dated
October 17, 2000, by and between IntraLase, Inc. (“LICENSEE”) and Escalon Medical Corporation (“ESCALON”) (the “License Agreement”) is effective as of the date executed by both LICENSEE and ESCALON (the “Effective
Date”). 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, LICENSEE and ESCALON hereby agree as
follows: 
  
 1. Paragraph 2.2 of the License Agreement shall be
deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
  
 “2.2 “Field of Use” shall refer to the field of laser medical instruments designed for human health and human cosmetic applications.” 
  
 2. Except as specifically amended in Paragraph 1 of this Amendment No. 1, all other terms and conditions of the License
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 in duplicate originals by their duly authorized officers or representatives. 
  

									
	FOR LICENSEE	 	 	 	FOR ESCALON MEDICAL CORPORATION
					
	 By
	 	 /s/    J. RANDY ALEXANDER

	 	 	 	 By
	 	 /s/    RICHARD J. DEPIANO


	 	 	(authorized representative)	 	 	 	 	 	(authorized representative)


									
	 Typed Name
	 	     J. Randy Alexander

	 	 	 	 Typed Name
	 	     Richard J. DePiano


					
	 Title
	 	     President and CEO

	 	 	 	 Title
	 	     CFO & Chairman


					
	 Date
	 	     5/17/01

	 	 	 	 Date
	 	     5/18/2001
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Magic Media Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Scott Venters, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: March 21, 2006

| /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                                                                                                                                                                    |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                             |
| Gordon Scott Venters, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
#### H. ROUW CO. v. TEXAS & N. O. R. CO.

No. 12575.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 10, 1953.

Rehearing Denied July 15, 1953.

James E. Little, Edinburg, for appellant.

Kelley, Looney, McLean & Littleton, Edinburg, Baker, Botts, Andrews & Parish, Houston, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court enjoining appellant shipper from prosecuting separately and without consolidation, twenty-four suits against the carrier for small and nominal claims filed in the Justice and County Courts of Hidalgo County, and from filing as separate suits twenty-five other claims identified in the decree, but not yet reduced to suits.

Each of the suits and claims asserts damages suffered by appellant on shipments over the carrier lines. The facts and amount of damages are not disputed, except that the carrier asserts that each claim should be reduced in the amount of the commissions the shipper would have been required to pay out of the price it would have received if the shipment had been sold on the market. That is the only law point and it is common to all the suits and claims. The trial court found that, Hie parties are identical; the amounts in controversy are nominal (in some instances less than fifty cents) ; and a trial with the suits consolidated will work no injury on the shipper, but will save costs, time and expense of all the litigants and the court.

The trial court ordered the injunction on facts like those discussed and analyzed fully in Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Pearlstone Mill and Elevator Co., Tex.Com.App., 53 S.W.2d 1001. To avoid a needless multiplicity of suits with its increased and disproportionate expense in *70time and costs where each suit must be tried separately, an injunction and order to consolidate are proper. Commonwealth Casualty & Ins. Co. v. Morris, Tex.Civ.App., 155 S.W.2d 394; Luttring v. American Fruit Growers, Tex.Civ.App., 49 S.W.2d 980; Stewart v. Orsburn, Tex.Civ.App., 41 S.W.2d 1008.

The judgment is affirmed.
EX-10.9





 Exhibit 10.9 

ADDENDUM #11 TO THE 

CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY MANAGEMENT SERVICES 

AGREEMENT 
 BETWEEN

 CITADEL MANAGEMENT BERMUDA LIMITED (“MANAGER”) 

(formerly Cedar Management Limited) 

AND 
 AMERINST INSURANCE
COMPANY, LTD. (“COMPANY”) 
 EFFECTIVE: January 1, 2019 

Management Agreement Addendum 
  

	 	1)	 It is hereby agreed that the COMPANY will compensate MANAGER at a rate of $350,000 for the twelve months
beginning 1/1/19 and ending 12/31/19, which shall be inclusive of all work by MANAGER on run-off of CAMICO and PDIC treaties as well as continuing business from Crum & Forster. 



 

	 	2)	 Cause the above fee to be paid in quarterly installments in advance at the beginning of each calendar quarter.



  

	 	3)	 Reimburse MANAGER for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred during the management of the COMPANY including; courier and express mail service; long distance telephone calls; travel and meeting
expenses incurred at the request of the COMPANY; costs of COMPANY stationery; filing fees; and similar expenses. 


  

	 	4)	 MANAGER will continue to provide COMPANY with monthly time summaries. 



COMPANY agrees that special projects will be invoiced separately at agreed upon fees or rates. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Addendum this 6th day of March, 2019. 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/  THOMAS R. MCMAHON

		 	Citadel Management Bermuda Limited (itself and on behalf of its affiliated companies)


  

			
	By:	 	 /s/  STUART GRAYSTON

		 	AmerInst Insurance Company, Ltd.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          27,482
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,538
<PP&E>                                       2,149,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,377,075
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,354,687
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    420,000
<COMMON>                                        41,299
<OTHER-SE>                                     463,785
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,377,075
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,544
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,302,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,411,376)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,411,376)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UAS Innovators, LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

August 14, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 121410, Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–2185 under 

Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 

C.F.R. Part 11, UAS Innovators, LLC (UAS Innovators), seeks to amend exemption No. 12410, Regulatory 

Docket No. FAA–2015–2185; Submitted by UAS Innovators for review May 20, 2015 and subsequently 

granted by the FAA on August 11, 2015. 

The original exemption made a request to allow operations for:

 Aerial Photography and Videography for the real estate, construction, and utilities industries 

 Agricultural Surveying and Application 

 sUAS Operator Training 

 Product Demonstrations 

 Research and Development

There have been no changes in the request for exemption from specific regulations or conditions and 

reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

This letter requests the addition of Closed-set filming for the motion picture and television industry to

the aforementioned service operations. 

Accompanying this submission electronically via e-mail is a copy of the UAS Innovators Motion Picture 

and Television Flight Operations manual (MPTOM) as required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, 

Section 1 to 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Regards,

Timothy Ford

President and CEO

AeroUAVs, LLC

11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353

Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

(314) 397-1110