# From: Telander, Jeff [mailto:Telander.Jeff@epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 1:24 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Barnett, Keith; VanLare, Paula

Subject: Brick and Structural Clay Impacts

Nathan,

Per your request for the document which discusses engineering costs, I’ve attached the current

draft of the BSCP Impacts Memo.

Jeff Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(D243-02)

RTP, NC 27711

919 - 541-5427

919 - 541-5450 (FAX)

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243-02

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC 27709

<< BSCP_Impacts_Memo_10-13-14.docx >>

# Date: October 13, 2014

To: Jeff Telander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD

From: Kristin Sroka, RTI International

Subject: Development of Cost and Emissi on Reduction Impacts for the BSCP NESHAP

I. Introduction

In accordance with section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) established national em ission standards for hazardous air pollutants

(NESHAP) on May 16, 2003, for the brick and struct ural clay products (B SCP) manufacturing

industry. The NESHAP regulated emissions of hydrogen fluoride (HF), hydrogen chloride

(HCl), and particulate matter (PM)—a surrogate for hazardous air pollutant (HAP) metals—from

tunnel kilns located at BSCP facilities. On March 13, 2007, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the

emission standards for BSCP manu facturing due to issues associated with the methodology used

to determine the minimum regulatory “floors” for new and existing units. 1 

# Therefore, the EPA is

proposing new standards for BSCP manufacturing, incl uding standards for HF, HCl, chlorine

(Cl 2 

# ), mercury (Hg), and non-Hg HA P metals (or PM surrogate).

The proposed standards include health-based standards for acid gases (HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# )

and maximum achievable control technology (MAC T) numeric emission limits for Hg and nonHg HAP metals (or PM surrogate ). In developing the proposed standards, the EPA also

considered “beyond-the-floor” options for Hg a nd non-Hg HAP metals, as well as alternative

standards for non-Hg HAP metals (or PM surrogate ). The development of these standards and

options are documented in Risk Assessment to Determine a Health-Based Emission Limitation

for Acid Gases for the Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing Source Category

(Morris et al, 2014) and Maximum Achievable Control Technol ogy (MACT) Floor Analysis for

Brick and Structural Clay Products (Raymond and Sroka, 2014). The purpose of this

memorandum is to present the methodology for es timating the costs, emission reductions, and

secondary impacts associated with these standa rds/options for the BSCP source category. A

background discussion of the types of costs, em ission reductions, and secondary impacts being

estimated is provided in Methodology and Assumptions Used to Estimate the Model Costs and

Impacts of BSCP Air Pollution Control Devices (Holloway, 2014a).

1 

# Sierra Club v. EPA , 479 F.3d 875 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

# 2 Section II of this memorandum shows the na tionwide baseline emissions for the BSCP

industry. Section III describes the development of the cost estimate s for facilities that elect to

reduce emissions and become reclassified as synt hetic area sources rather than major sources.

Section IV describes the assessment of what air pollution control devices (APCD) would be

needed for major source facilities to meet th e proposed health-based standards. Section V

describes the analysis of what APCD would be needed for tunnel kiln stacks to meet the

proposed MACT standards and presents the nationwide costs, emission reductions, and

secondary impacts associated with meeting all the proposed standards. Section VI describes the

calculation of the nationwide cost s, emission reductions, and s econdary impacts associated the

beyond-the-floor options for non-Hg HAP metals and Hg. Finally, Section VII describes the

calculation of the nationwide costs, emission redu ctions, and secondary impacts associated with

the alternative non-Hg HAP metals standards.

II. Baseline Emissions

Uncontrolled emission factors, model kiln production rates, and model kiln operating

hours were developed as described in Methodology and Assumptions Used to Estimate the Model

Costs and Impacts of BSCP Air Pollution Control Devices (Holloway, 2014a). The

memorandum also documents control efficiencies and emissions reductions for new/retrofit

APCD installations. The efficiencies and emi ssions for existing (baseline) APCD, including dry

sorbent injection followed by a fabr ic filter (DIFF), dry lime scrubbe r and fabric filter (DLS/FF),

dry limestone adsorber (DLA), and spray dryer/ electrostatic precipitato r (SD/ESP), were based

on all the available test data (see Test Data Used in BSCP Proposed Rule (Raymond, 2014)).

Table 1 shows the control efficiencies of ba seline DIFF, DLS/FF, and DLA for HF, HCl, Cl 2



# , PM, and sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

# ). Table 2 shows the annual baseline emission estimates in tons per

year (tpy) for small and large APCD.

Table 1. Control Efficiencies for Baseline APCD

APCD Type Efficiency

HF HCl Cl 2 

# PM a 

# SO 2



# DIFF 98% 82% 88% 72% 48%

DLS/FF 98% 82% 88% 72% 48%

DLA 95% 30% 42% 20% 12%

a 

# Control efficiencies for non-Hg HAP metals and PM wi th particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM 2.5 

# ) are

estimated to be the same as the efficiency for PM.

# 3 Table 2. Annual Baseline Emissions for Each APCD

APCD

Type Size Emissions per APCD (tpy) a



# HF HCl Cl 2 

# Non-Hg

HAP

Metals PM PM 2.5 

# SO 2



# None Small 15.2 2.07 0.0884 0.0910 8.27 3.97 82.5

DIFF Small 0.304 0.372 0.0106 0.0255 2.32 1.11 42.9

DLS/FF Small 0.304 0.372 0.0106 0.0255 2.32 1.11 42.9

DLA Small 0.759 1.45 0.0512 0.0728 6.62 3.18 72.6

SD/ESP Small 17.5 4.28 0.543 0.00910 0.83 0.397 42.9

None Large 34.8 4.73 0.202 0.208 18.9 9.09 189

DIFF Large 0.695 0.851 0.0243 0.0583 5.30 2.55 98.3

DLS/FF Large 0.695 0.851 0.0243 0.0583 5.30 2.55 98.3

DLA Large 1.74 3.31 0.117 0.167 15.2 7.27 166

SD/ESP Large 37.5 9.14 1.16 0.0195 1.77 0.849 98.3

a 

# There are no existing controls for mercury (Hg), so eac h small kiln stack is estimated to emit a baseline of

0.00160 tpy of Hg and each large kiln stack is es timated to emit a baseline of 0.00366 tpy of Hg.



# The inventory of BSCP kilns a nd facilities, including the APCD for each kiln stack is

presented in Updated BSCP Inventory Database and Documentation (Holloway, 2014b). To

develop the nationwide baseline emission estimat es, each kiln stack in this inventory was

assigned the appropriate baseline emissions from Table 2 based on the size and type of APCD on

the stack. Table 3 summarizes the number of BSCP kiln stacks with each type of APCD and the

total nationwide baseline emissions.

# 4 Table 3. Nationwide Baseline Emissions Estimates for BSCP Tunnel Kilns

APCD

Type Size Count Emissions (tpy)

HF HCl Cl 2 

# NonHg

HAP

Metals Hg PM PM 2.5 

# SO 2



# None Small 74 1,120 153 6.54 6.73 0.118 612 294 6,110

DIFF Small 1 0.304 0.372 0.0106 0.0255 0.00160 2.32 1.11 42.9

DLS/FF Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

DLA Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SD/ESP Small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

None Large 36 1,250 170 7.28 7.50 0.132 682 327 6,800

DIFF Large 13 9.04 11.1 0.316 0.758 0.0475 68.9 33.1 1,280

DLS/FF Large 1 0.695 0.851 0.0243 0.0583 0.00366 5.30 2.55 98.3

DLA Large 25 43.5 82.8 2.93 4.17 0.0914 379 182 4,160

SD/ESP Large 1 37.5 9.14 1.16 0.0195 0.00366 1.77 0.849 98.3



# Total 151 2,470 427 18.3 19.3 0.398 1,750 841 18,600



# III. Estimate of Cost to Facilities to Become Synthetic Area Sources

Given the large number of small entities in the BSCP industry, it is anticipated that

owners and operators will explor e the possibility of reducing emissions below the thresholds

defining a major source of HAP emissions (potential to emit [P TE] 10 tpy of a single HAP or

25 tpy of all HAP combined) and be coming reclassified as a synthe tic area source so that their

sources would not be subject to the BSCP NESHAP. If an owner or operator estimates that the

cost to become a synthetic area source is less than the compliance costs for the BSCP NESHAP,

it is expected that the owner or operator would elect to become a synthetic area source. The

methodology behind this analysis is described in this section; Appendix A shows the detailed

calculations for each BSCP tunnel kiln and facility.

To compare the cost to become a synt hetic area source to the BSCP NESHAP

compliance costs, the cost for each facility to become a synthetic area source was estimated

based on the facility’s current emission estimat es and whether installa tion of a DLA would

reduce the acid gas emissions below major source thresholds. Design capacities are available for

each tunnel kiln at each major s ource facility in the BSCP in dustry (Holloway, 2014b), and test

data are available for some of those kilns (R aymond, 2014). The design capacities, site-specific

test data (where available; emi ssion factors were used if test da ta were not available), and model

control device parameters were used to estimate potential emissions from each kiln before and

after control.

For simplicity, the analysis was limited to HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# , since those are the

predominant HAP emitted from BSCP kilns by mass. If HF, HCl, and/or Cl 2 

# test data were

available for a kiln, the emission factor calculate d from the test in units of pounds of emissions

per ton of bricks (lb/ton) was used to estimat e potential emissions. If not, the average lb/ton

# 5 emission factor for the existing control device (c alculated based on the available BSCP test data

for those pollutants) was used.

A code was assigned to each kiln indicati ng the source of the data. Since the Cl 2 

# data set

was limited, the main focus was the source of HF and HCl data. If both HF and HCl emissions

were based on test data, the code of “2” was assigned; if the em issions for one pollutant were

based on test data but the emissions for the ot her were based on the average emission factor, a

code of “1” was assigned, and if no test data we re available for that kiln, a code of “0” was

assigned. The HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# emissions for each kiln were th en calculated in tpy based on the

kiln design capacity, assuming 8,760 hours of ope ration per year (in order to estimate the

maximum PTE), and then summed per kiln and then per facility.

The current status (i.e., ma jor or synthetic area source) was estimated based on the

following assumptions:

 If both HF and HCl test data we re available for all kilns at the facility (code of 2) and

the total facility estimated PTE was less than 90 percent of each of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

 If a mix of test data and emission factors were used for the facility (code of 1) and the

total facility estimated PTE was less than 75 percent of each of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

 If no test data for any kilns at the facility were available (code of 0) and the total

facility estimated PTE was less than 60 percent of each of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area.

It should be noted that to the EPA’s knowledge, all of the facilities in the analysis are

currently classified as major sources. The source s estimated to be synthetic area sources in this

analysis are facilities w ith emissions data suggesting that they could apply for synthetic area

status with their permitting author ity without needing to add APCD or reduce the kiln production

rates ( i.e. , becoming a synthetic area source would requir e minimal cost). Based on the analysis,

15 of the 86 current major sources have low enough PTE that they could become synthetic area

sources with minimal cost ( i.e. , submitting paperwork to their permitting authority for a formal

change in classification).

The next step was to assign an action to be taken and estimate “controlled” emissions. If

the kiln was already controlled, or if the facility was already cons idered a synthetic area source

based on current emissions, the action was “None”; otherwise it was “Install DLA.” (For the

purposes of this analysis, it was assumed that the cost to retrofit currently-controlled tunnel kilns

would not be less than the cost to comply w ith the BSCP NESHAP.) A few uncontrolled kilns

were manually adjusted to “None” for facilities with multiple kilns that could become synthetic

area sources without control ling all kilns. See Appendix A for these designations.

Controlled emissions for kilns with an ac tion of “Install DLA” were estimated as a

reduction from the individual k iln PTE for HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# based on the DLA control

efficiencies presented in Table 1. If the action was “None,” cont rolled emissions were estimated

to be equivalent to the PTE (a s calculated above). The “controlle d” emissions for each kiln at

each facility were then summed.

# 6 The next step was to determine what the major/area source status would be after DLA

were installed (where possible), based on the following assumptions:

 If no DLA would be installed, both HF and HC l test data were available for all kilns

at the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 90 percent of the

major source thresholds, the facility was c onsidered synthetic area without additional

control.

 If no DLA would be installed, a mix of test data and emission factors were used for

the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 75 percent of the major

source thresholds, the facil ity was considered syntheti c area without additional

control.

 If no DLA would be installed, no test data we re available for any kilns at the facility,

and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 60 percent of the major source

thresholds, the facility was considered synthetic area without additional control.

 If at least one DLA would be installed, both HF and HCl test data were available for

all kilns at the facility, and the total facil ity estimated PTE was less than 80 percent of

the major source thresholds, the facility wa s considered synthetic area after control.

 If at least one DLA would be installed, a mi x of test data and emission factors were

used for the facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 65 percent of

the major source thresholds, the facility wa s considered synthetic area after control.

 If at least one DLA would be installed, no test data were available for any kilns at the

facility, and the total facility estimated PTE was less than 50 percent of the major

source thresholds, the faci lity was considered synt hetic area after control.

After determining major/area so urce status, the capital and annual costs of installing a

DLA were estimated, if doing so was estimated to en able the facility to become synthetic area.

The DLA costs were estimated using model co sts developed based on cost and parameter

information from BSCP industry responses to the 2008 section 114 survey (Holloway, 2014a).

The costs for each kiln were then summed for ea ch facility considered synthetic area after

control. If the facility would still be major even with a DLA installed on each uncontrolled kiln,

the costs were left blank. If the potential action was “None” ( i.e. , the kiln was already controlled

or the facility was already expected to be a synthetic area source), the facility costs were

estimated as $0.

IV. Cost and Emission Reduction Esti mates for Meeting Heal th-Based Standards

For the acid gases HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# , a health-based emission limit was developed for

acid gases under CAA section 112(d)(4 ). The rationale behind the standard is discussed in the

preamble to the BSCP proposed rule. The deve lopment of the facility -level health-based

emission limit, 250 tons per year (tpy) of HC l-equivalent (57 pounds per hour (lb/hr) of HClequivalent), is documented in Risk Assessment to Determine a He alth-Based Emission Limitation

for Acid Gases for the Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing Source Category

(Morris et al, 2014). The methodology for estimati ng the impacts of meeting this standard is

described in this section; Appe ndix B shows the detailed calculations for each BSCP tunnel kiln

and facility.

# 7 The equivalency of HCl with HF and Cl 2 

# is based on the chronic Reference

Concentration (RfC) values for each of the acid gases. The RfC for HCl is 20 micrograms per

cubic meter (μg/m 3 

# ), the RfC for HF is 14 μg/m 3 

# , and the RfC for Cl 2 

# is 0.15 μg/m 3 

# (Morris et al,

2014). Therefore, the following equation can be us ed to calculate the HC l-equivalent emissions

for an individual kiln:



#  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

2 2



# Cl HCl

Cl

HF HCl

HF HCl i 

# RfC RfC

E RfC RfC

E E E

where:

E = HCl-equivalent emissions, lb/hr

E HCl 

# = emissions of HCl, lb/hr

E HF 

# = emissions of HF, lb/hr

E Cl2 

# = emissions of Cl 2 

# , lb/hr

RfC HCl 

# = reference concentration for HCl, 20 μg/m 3



# RfC HF 

# = reference concentration for HF, 14 μg/m 3



# RfC Cl2 

# = reference concentration for chlorine, 0.15 μg/m 3



# Design capacities are available for each tunnel kiln at each major source facility in the

BSCP industry, and permitted capacities are avai lable for some tunnel kilns (Holloway, 2014b).

Test data are available for some of the kilns in the BSCP industry (Raymond, 2014). If test data

were not available for all acid gas emissions ( i.e. , HF, HCl, and Cl 2 

# ), emission factors were used

to estimate emissions. This information was us ed in the equation abov e to calculate an HClequivalent value for each kiln. The HCl-equiva lent values were summed for each kiln at a

facility and then compared to the health-based emission limit. If a facility did not meet the

health-based emission limit, the type of control needed was determined based on factors such as

the current kiln APCD, the number of kilns at the facility, and how much the HCl-equivalent

emissions exceeded the health-based emission lim it. (Note that the final costs and emission

reductions for each kiln were not calculated until the impacts for meeting the PM/non-Hg HAP

metals and Hg limits were assessed as desc ribed in Section V of this memorandum.)

As shown in Appendix B, all but one BSCP f acility could meet the health-based emission

limit with current control configur ations. The facility not mee ting the limit is Belden Brick

Company’s facility in Sugarcreek, Ohio, with an HCl-equivalent estimate of 120 lb/hr from a

total of 10 tunnel kilns, some of which are ve nted together through a common stack or APCD.

Most of the HCl-equivalent emissions (about 71 percent) are generate d by the three kilns

controlled by a SD/ESP at the part of the faci lity known as Plant #8. Removing the SD/ESP and

retrofitting the stack with a DIFF is expected to reduce HCl-equivalent emissions well below the

health-based emission limit, even without reduci ng emissions from any of the other seven kilns

at this facility.

# 8 V. Cost and Emission Reduction Estima tes for Meeting Hg and non-Hg HAP Metals

Proposed Standards

There are 172 tunnel k ilns with 151 stacks at facilities currently classified as major

sources in the BSCP industry. There are 23 t unnel kilns with 19 stack s at the 15 facilities

identified in Section III of this memorandum th at could become synthetic area sources with

minimal cost, leaving 149 tunnel kilns with 132 stacks pot entially impacted by the proposed Hg

and non-Hg HAP metals standards. A summary of these kilns by size and APCD is shown in

Table 4; the stack counts for these kilns were used for all remaining analyses in this

memorandum.

Table 4. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kilns and APCD

Kiln Size APCD Type Number of Kilns Number of Kiln Stacks

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 9 8

DLA 18 14

None 32 31

Small Kilns SD/ESP 3 1

None 87 78

Total 149 132



# The proposed BSCP NESHAP includes MACT standards for Hg and for non-Hg HAP

metals (with PM as a surrogate) (see Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor

Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products (Raymond and Sroka, 2014) for additional

information on these standards). As noted previous ly, test data were available for some kilns in

the industry (including major and s ynthetic area sources). Data on PM emissions were available

for about 40 percent of the kilns, while Hg and non-Hg HAP metals data were only available for

about 10 percent or less of the kilns (Raymond, 2014). Therefore, rather than evaluating the

impacts of the standards on a kiln-by-kiln basis, as was done for the health-based emission limit,

several assumptions were needed to evaluate th e impacts on the whole in dustry. This analysis

was completed in a series of four steps, de scribed in the remainde r of this section.

Step 1: Compare Test Da ta to Emission Limits

The first step was to compare the data available with the proposed emission limits to get

an estimate of the percentage of tunnel kilns in the industry that could meet the limits with

current APCD configurations. Table 5 shows the percentages for the PM and Hg lb/ton and

concentration emission limits by kiln size and the most common types of APCD (for PM).

# 9 Table 5. Percentages of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to Proposed Emission Limits

Pollutant Kiln Size APCD Type Number of

Kiln Stacks

with Data a 

# Percentage of Kilns Meeting b



# lb/ton

Limit Concentration

Limit At Least

One Limit

PM Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 28 92.9% 92.9% 92.9%

DLA 30 70.0% 76.7% 86.7%

None 3 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%

Small Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 1 100% 100% 100%

DLA 0 ND ND ND

None 16 25.0% 62.5% 62.5%

Hg Large Kilns All 18 16.7% 55.6% 55.6%

Small Kilns All 1 100% 100% 100%

a 

# PM data were also available for one stack controlled by a SD/ESP (small kilns) and three large kilns with wet

scrubbers. Those kilns are not shown in the counts fo r PM emissions data because the SD/ESP is expected to be

replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum) and all three wet scrubbers are located at synthetic area

sources, so the results for those APCD are not needed for purposes of estimating impacts on major source

facilities. In addition, the analysis does not assume that wet scrubbers would be installed or retrofitted to meet the

proposed PM standards. These kilns are included in the counts for Hg data; because none of the APCD currently

in use in the BSCP industry target Hg reductions, the ab ility to meet the Hg standards is not expected to be affected

by type of current APCD.

b 

# ND = no test data available for that pollutant, kiln size, and APCD combination.



# Of the large kilns with both PM and Hg data, seven of the 18 kiln stacks meet at least one

of the PM and one of the Hg limits. (One of th ese stacks is controlled w ith a wet scrubber and is

not included in the kiln stack counts with PM da ta in Table 5, as indi cated in footnote a to

Table 4.) For small kilns, Hg data are only available for three kilns vented together and

controlled with a SD/ESP; this device also meet s the PM concentration limit for small kilns.

Step 2: Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The percentages from Table 5 were applied to the kiln stack counts in Table 4 to

determine the number of kiln stacks estimated to be able to meet the pr oposed MACT floors.

From these estimates, preliminary estimates of th e number of APCD needed to be installed were

developed using the following criteria:

 If the kiln is expected to meet both a PM and a Hg limit, no additional APCD is

needed.

 If an uncontrolled kiln or a kiln with a DLA can meet a Hg limit but none of the PM

limits, a FF would be needed.

 If an uncontrolled kiln or a kiln with a DLA cannot meet either of the Hg limits, a FF

with activated carbon in jection (ACI) would be needed regardless of whether the kiln

can meet a PM limit, as the FF would be needed for the capture of the activated

carbon injected into the gas stream.

 If a kiln with a DIFF or DLS/FF cannot meet either of the Hg limits, ACI would be

added to the existing control device.

# 10 Table 6 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of APCD needed based only on

these criteria and the percentages in Table 5, ro unded to the nearest whole number. If multiple

kilns were vented together, only one APCD was a ssigned to the stack. As noted in Step 3, there

are two other factors to take in to account to determine the final estimate of the number of APCD

needed and the impacts on the major source kilns.

Table 6. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Preliminary Estimate of APCD

to be Installed

Kiln Size Existing APCD

Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

PM Limit Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

Hg Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install FF Install FF

with ACI Add ACI

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 7 a 

# 4 0 0 4

DLA 14 12 8 0 6 0

None 31 10 17 7 14 0

Small Kilns SD/ESP b 

# 1 0 1 0 0 0

None 78 49 78 29 0 0

Total 132 79 108 36 20 3

a 

# Because the one kiln stack not meeting the PM lb/ton or concentration limits is already controlled with a PM APCD,

none of the preliminary assumptions apply. If this kiln stack cannot meet the lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals limit, or if it is

not located at a facility that could become a synthetic ar ea source by installing a DLA on an uncontrolled kiln, the

DIFF or DLS/FF would have to be retrofit with a new DIFF.

b 

# The SD/ESP is expected to be replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum).



# Step 3: Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

considering the impact of the lb /hr limits for Hg and total non-Hg HAP meta ls. The total non-Hg

HAP metals limit is expected to provide addi tional flexibility to tunnel kiln owners and

operators, particularly for small tunnel kilns. Where total non-Hg HAP metals lb/hr data were

available, the values were compiled for each kiln . If PM data were available but non-Hg HAP

metals data were not, the total non-Hg HAP meta l lb/hr value was calcula ted using the average

ratio of metals to PM emissions in BSCP st ack tests (Raymond, 2014). The non-Hg HAP metal

values for each kiln are shown in Appendix C. While it is also expected that the lb/hr limit for

Hg would provide additional flexib ility to tunnel kiln owners a nd operators, again particularly

for small tunnel kilns, the impact of the lb/hr Hg limit is not assessed quantitatively in this

analysis. Instead, it was expected that most kiln s that could meet the lb/hr Hg limit could also

meet either the lb/ton limit or the concentration limit.

The other factor to be taken into account in determining the number of APCD required to

be installed is the number of kilns located at f acilities that could elect to become synthetic area

sources. The cost for each facility to do so wa s estimated as described in Section III of this

memorandum. However, as noted previously in th is section, because test data are not available

for every tunnel kiln in the industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each kiln and

# 11 facility. Therefore, the cost to become a synthe tic area source could not be compared directly to

the cost of compliance. For example, while th e analysis estimates that the BSCP facility in

Thomasville, North Carolina, owned by Cunningha m Brick Company could become a synthetic

area source at an annual cost of $410,000 (see Appendix A), test data are not available to show

the facility’s exact level of emissions. If performance testi ng of the tunnel kiln at this facility

showed that the kiln already meets the proposed li mits, then installing a control device to become

a synthetic area source would not be necessary.

Therefore, the preliminary APCD estimates in Table 6, the total non-Hg HAP metals

lb/hr limit, the ability of certain facilities to become synthetic area were considered together on a

more general basis. The following assumptions were used to refine the preliminary APCD

estimates:

 For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it was assumed that the kiln stack not meeting

either the PM lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the total non-Hg HAP metals

lb/hr limit. It was also assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the Hg lb/ton

or concentration limits would meet the Hg lb/hr limit.

 For large kilns with a DLA, it was assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the

Hg lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the Hg lb/hr limit. It was also assumed

that this kiln stack is one of the 12 stacks that can meet one of the PM limits, so no FF

would be needed.

 Based on the results of the analysis desc ribed in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 12 large uncontrolled k iln stacks are located at f acilities that could become

synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stacks. For large

uncontrolled kilns, it was assumed that owners or operators of th ree-fourths of these

kiln stacks, or nine total stack s, would elect to install a DLA. To be conservative, it

was estimated that most of the remaining kiln stacks would not be able to meet any of

the Hg limits.

 It was expected that most small uncontrolled kilns would be able to meet the total

non-Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit and would not need to install DLA to become a

synthetic area source. Therefore, for sma ll uncontrolled kilns, it was assumed that a

little over 5 percent of the total kiln stack s, or five total stacks, were located at

facilities that would elect to become synthe tic area sources by in stalling a DLA. It

was also assumed that 21 of the 24 remain ing kiln stacks not meeting the PM lb/ton

or concentration limits (88 percent) would be able to meet the total non-Hg HAP

metals lb/hr limit.

The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 7.

# 12 Table 7. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Estimate of APCD to be

Installed

Kiln Size Existing

APCD Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add

ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a 

# No

Change

in APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 0 0 3 0 0 5

DLA 14 0 5 0 0 0 9

None 31 1 11 0 0 9 10

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 

# 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 78 3 0 0 0 5 70

Total 132 4 16 3 1 14 93

a 

# See Section IV of this memorandum.



# Step 4: Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide costs and impacts was to apply model APCD

costs, emission reductions, and secondary impact s to the APCD counts shown in Table 7. The

model APCD size is based on the design capacity(ie s) of the kiln(s) routed to that emission

point/APCD. For example, two small kilns vented together with a total design capacity of less

than 10 tph would be controlled with a small APCD, whereas two small kilns vented together

that have a total design capacity of more than 10 tph would be contro lled with a large APCD.

As noted in Section IV of this memora ndum, Belden Brick Company’s facility in

Sugarcreek, Ohio, was identified as not meeting the health-based standard with the current

APCD at the kiln, so the emissions at the kiln s were evaluated individually. The three kilns

routed to the SD/ESP at Sugarcreek are small kilns, but the sum of the total kiln capacity vented

to the SD/ESP is greater than 10 tph. Similarly, the Sugarcreek facility has three small kilns

vented to one uncontrolled stack with a total kiln capacity of gr eater than 10 tph. Therefore, for

purposes of this analysis, the DIFF installed to replace the SD/ESP would be a large DIFF, and a

large FF would be needed on one of the small ki ln stacks. The other two FF and the five DLA

shown in Table 7 to be installed on small kilns nationwide would be small APCD.

Table 8 shows the summary of nationwide costs for BSCP kilns at major sources, Table 9

shows the summary of nationwide emission reduc tions for BSCP kilns at major sources, and

Table 10 shows the summary of na tionwide secondary impacts for BS CP kilns at major sources.

# 13 Table 8. Summary of Nationwide Costs for Major Sources to Meet Proposed Standards

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Unit

Capital

Cost a 

# Unit

Annual

Cost a 

# Number

of

APCD Total

Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $96,482 3 $440,090 $289,446

DLA Install FF with ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,488 5 $8,233,483 $3,112,440

SD/ESP Retrofit with a DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,585 1 $3,820,000 $943,585

None Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 2 $3,000,000 $1,052,012

None Install FF with ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,488 11 $18,113,663 $6,847,368

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $409,722 9 $13,405,928 $3,687,499

None Install FF Small $1,200,000 $437,845 2 $2,400,000 $875,690

None Install DLA Small $1,096,473 $310,036 5 $5,482,363 $1,550,180

Total Nationwide 38 $54,895,527 $18,358,221

a 

# Unit costs from Holloway (2014a), except for the DLA capi tal and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table were increased to account for the fa ct that if a DLA is insta lled for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it would need to be installed ear lier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for all APCD for purposes of this analysis, a DLA was

expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other APCD, increasing the capital cost by about 3 percent

(calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 

# ). The total annual cost increased due to the

increase in the annual ized capital cost.14Table 9. Summary of Nationwide Emission Reductions for Major Sources to Meet Proposed StandardsCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEmissions Reductions (tpy)HFHClCl2HAPMetalsPMHgSO2PM2.5aDIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.00311 0 0Total 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.00932 0 0DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0.00311 0 6.73Total 5 0 0 0 0.77 70.0 0.0155 0 33.6SD/ESP Retrofitwith a DIFFLarge Unit 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0Total 1 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55Total 2 0 0 0 0.392 35.6 0 0 17.1None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0.00311 0 8.55Total 11 0 0 0 2.15 196 0.0342 0 94.0None Install DLA Large Unit 33.0 1.42 0.0850 0.0417 3.79 0 22.7 1.82Total 9 297 12.8 0.765 0.375 34.1 0 204 16.4None Install FF Small Unit 0 0 0 0.0855 7.78 0 0 3.73Total 2 0 0 0 0.171 15.6 0 0 7.46None Install DLA Small Unit 14.4 0.620 0.0371 0.0182 1.65 0 9.90 0.794Total 5 72.1 3.10 0.186 0.0910 8.27 0 49.5 3.97Total Nationwide 38 407 24.2 2.09 3.95 359 0.0590 255 173aEstimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.15Table 10. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for Major Sources to Meet Proposed StandardsaCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEnergyimpacts,MMBtu/yrSolidwasteimpacts,tpyWastewaterimpacts,gpySecondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)PMPM2.5CONOxSO2DIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 553 17.9 -- 0.00408 0.00137 0.00688 0.0547 0.159Total 3 1,659 53.8 0.0122 0.00410 0.0206 0.164 0.478DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 13,116 35.7 -- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78Total 5 65,580 179 0.484 0.162 0.816 6.48 18.9SD/ESP Retrofit witha DIFFLarge Unit -24,555 12.9 -4,063 -0.181 -0.0607 -0.305 -2.43 -7.07Total 1 -24,555 12.9 -4,063 -0.181 -0.0607 -0.305 -2.43 -7.07None Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8 -- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62Total 2 25,126 35.6 0.185 0.0622 0.313 2.48 7.24None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 13,116 35.7 -- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78Total 11 144,275 393 1.06 0.357 1.79 14.3 41.6None Install DLA Large Unit 7,424 457 -- 0.0548 0.0184 0.0923 0.734 2.14Total 9 66,812 4,116 0.493 0.165 0.831 6.60 19.2None Install FF Small Unit 9,620 7.78 -- 0.0710 0.0238 0.120 0.951 2.77Total 2 19,240 15.6 0.142 0.0476 0.239 1.90 5.54None Install DLA Small Unit 3,741 306 -- 0.0276 0.00925 0.0465 0.370 1.08Total 5 18,705 1,529 0.138 0.0463 0.233 1.85 5.39Total Nationwide 38 316,842 6,335 -4,063 2.34 0.784 3.94 31.3 91.3aA negative increase in secondary impacts would be equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

# 16 VI. Cost and Emission Reduction Estima tes for Meeting non-Hg HAP Metals and Hg

Beyond-the-Floor Options

As noted in the preamble to the proposed rule, the beyond-the-floor options considered

for BSCP tunnel kilns were emission limits equal to the new source limits for Hg and for non-Hg

HAP metals (with PM as a surr ogate). The development of these limits is documented in

Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Fl oor Analysis for Bri ck and Structural Clay

Products (Raymond and Sroka, 2014). The process to estimate costs, emission reductions, and

secondary impacts for the beyond-the-floor options is the same four-step process described in

Section V of this memorandum. The Hg and fo r non-Hg HAP metals beyond-the-floor options

were considered separately to clearly evalua te the impacts of applying each option. When

considering each beyond-the-floor option, all othe r standards were applie d as proposed, and the

impacts calculated in Section V associated w ith the proposed standards were removed to

calculate incremental impacts for the beyond-the-floor option.

A. Non-Hg HAP Metals Beyond-the-Floor Option

Step 1: Compare Test Da ta to Emission Limits

Table 11 shows the percentages for the PM lb /ton and concentration emission limits by

kiln size and the most common types of APCD for the non-Hg HAP metals beyond-the-floor

option.

Table 11. Percentages of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to PM Beyond-the-Floor Limit

Kiln Size APCD Type Number of

Kiln Stacks

with Data a 

# Percentage of Kilns Meeting b



# lb/ton Limit Concentration

Limit At Least

One Limit

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 28 28.6% 32.1% 35.7%

DLA 30 3.33% 13.3% 13.3%

None 3 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%

Small Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 1 100% 100% 100%

DLA 0 ND ND ND

None 16 6.25% 18.8% 18.8%

a 

# PM data were also available for one stack controlled by a SD/ESP (small kilns) and three large kilns with wet

scrubbers. Those kilns are not shown in the counts fo r PM emissions data because the SD/ESP is expected to be

replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum) and all three wet scrubbers are located at synthetic area

sources, so the results for those APCD are not needed for purposes of estimating impacts on major source

facilities. In addition, the analysis does not assume that wet scrubbers would be installed or retrofitted to meet the

proposed PM standards.

b 

# ND = no test data available for that pollutant, kiln size, and APCD combination.

# 17 Step 2: Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

For the non-Hg HAP metals beyond-the-floor op tion, the percentages from Table 11 were

applied to the kilns in Table 4 for non-Hg HAP metals/PM emissions, and the percentages from

Table 5 were applied to the kilns in Table 4 for Hg emissions. From these estimates, preliminary

estimates of the number of APCD needed to be in stalled were developed using same criteria as

described in Section V of this memorandum.

Table 12 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of APCD needed for the non-Hg

HAP metals beyond-the-floor option based only on th ese criteria and the pe rcentages in Tables 4

and 11, rounded to the nearest whole number. If multiple kilns were vented together, only one

APCD was assigned to the stack.

Table 12. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Preliminary Estimate of APCD

to be Installed for the Non-Hg HAP Metals Beyond-the-Floor Option

Kiln

Size Existing

APCD

Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number of

Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

PM Limit Number of

Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

Hg Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Retrofit

with

DIFF Retrofit

with

DIFF and

ACI

Large

Kilns DIFF or

DLS/FF 8 3 4 0 0 1 4

DLA 14 2 8 6 6 0 0

None 31 10 17 7 14 0 0

Small

Kilns SD/ESP 1 0 1 0 0 1 0

None 78 15 78 63 0 0 0

Total 132 30 108 76 20 2 4



# Step 3: Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

considering the impact of the proposed Hg lb /hr limit and the beyond-th e-floor total non-Hg

HAP metals lb/hr limit, as well as the number of kilns located at facilities that could elect to

become synthetic area sources. As noted previously in this memo randum, because test data are

not available for every tunnel kiln in the industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each

kiln and facility. Therefore, the preliminary AP CD estimates in Table 12, the lb/hr limits, and

the ability of certain facilities to become s ynthetic area were consider ed together on a more

general basis. The following assumptions were us ed to refine the preliminary APCD estimates:

 For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it wa s assumed that two of the kiln stacks not

meeting either the beyond-the-floor PM lb/t on or concentration limits would meet the

beyond-the-floor total non-Hg HAP metals lb /hr limit and that a th ird kiln stack is

located at a facility that woul d elect to be reclassified as a synthetic area source. It

# 18 was also assumed that one of the kiln st acks not meeting the proposed Hg lb/ton or

concentration limits would meet the proposed Hg lb/hr limit.

 For large kilns with a DLA, it was assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the

proposed Hg lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the proposed Hg lb/hr limit. It

was also assumed that this kiln stack is one of the two stacks that can meet one of the

beyond-the-floor PM limits, so no FF would be needed.

 Based on the results of the analysis desc ribed in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 12 large uncontrolled k iln stacks are located at f acilities that could become

synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stacks. Because the

beyond-the-floor total non-Hg HAP metals/P M limits are more stringent than the

proposed non-Hg HAP metals/PM limits, more facilities would be expected to install

one or more DLA to become a synthetic area source. Therefore, for large

uncontrolled kilns, it was assumed that owners or operators of 10 of those kiln stacks,

or one more than under the proposed standards, would elect to install a DLA. It was

expected that nine of these 10 are the same kiln stacks that would install a DLA as in

Section V of this memorandum and that the te nth kiln stack is one of those that would

not meet the proposed Hg limit.

 The biggest difference between the proposed limits and the non-Hg HAP metals

beyond-the-floor option would be seen for sm all uncontrolled kilns. Because of the

increase in stringency in the non-Hg HAP metals and PM surrogate limits, more

facilities would elect to install DLA on uncont rolled kilns to become synthetic area

sources. Therefore, it was assumed that a little less than 60 percent of the total kiln

stacks, or 45 total stacks, were located at facilities that would elect to become

synthetic area sources by inst alling a DLA. Only three of the remaining kiln stacks

not meeting the PM lb/ton or concentration limits would be able to meet the total nonHg HAP metals lb/hr limit due to the increased stringency of this limit.

The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 13.

Table 13. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Estimate of APCD to be

Installed for the Non-Hg HAP Metals Beyond-the-Floor Option

Kiln Size Existing

APCD Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add

ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a 

# No

Change

in APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 0 0 3 2 0 3

DLA 14 6 5 0 0 0 3

None 31 1 10 0 0 10 10

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 

# 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 78 15 0 0 0 45 18

Total 132 22 15 3 3 55 34

a 

# See Section IV of this memorandum.

# 19 Step 4: Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide co sts and impacts for the non-Hg HAP metals

beyond-the-floor option was to apply model APCD costs, emission reductions, and secondary

impacts to the APCD counts shown in Table 13. The model APCD size is based on the design

capacity(ies) of the kiln(s) routed to that emi ssion point/APCD. For example, two small kilns

vented together with a total desi gn capacity of less than 10 tph would be controlled with a small

APCD, whereas two small kilns vented together th at have a total design capacity of more than

10 tph would be controlled with a large APCD.

As noted in Section IV of this memora ndum, for purposes of th is analysis, it was

estimated that the DIFF installed to replace the SD/ESP at Belden Brick Company’s facility in

Sugarcreek, Ohio would be a large DIFF. It wa s also estimated that three of the 15 FF and one

of the 45 DLA shown in Table 13 for small kilns would be controlling multiple kilns and would

therefore be large FF and a large DLA. The re maining APCD shown in Table 13 would be sized

for one kiln.

For the non-Hg HAP metals beyond-the-floor option, Table 14 shows the summary of

nationwide costs, Table 15 shows the summary of nationwide emission reductions, and Table 16

shows the summary of nationwide secondary impact s. Based on the incremental annual cost in

Table 14 and the incremental non -Hg HAP metals emission reductions in Table 15, the cost

effectiveness of the non-Hg HAP metals beyond- the-floor option is $7.96 million per additional

ton of non-Hg HAP metals reduced.

# 20 Table 14. Summary of Nationwide Costs for the Non-Hg HAP Metals Beyond-the-Floor

Option

Current

APCD Action APCD Size Unit

Capital

Cost a 

# Unit

Annual

Cost a 

# Number

of

APCD Total

Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $96,482 3 $440,090 $289,446

DIFF or

DLS/FF Retrofit with a

DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,585 2 $7,640,000 $1,887,169

DLA Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 6 $9,000,000 $3,156,036

DLA Install FF with

ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,488 5 $8,233,483 $3,112,440

SD/ESP Retrofit with a

DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,585 1 $3,820,000 $943,585

None Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 4 $6,000,000 $2,104,024

None Install FF with

ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,488 10 $16,466,966 $6,224,880

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $409,722 11 $16,385,023 $4,506,944

None Install FF Small $1,200,000 $437,845 12 $14,400,000 $5,254,140

None Install DLA Small $1,096,473 $310,036 44 $48,244,791 $13,641,586

Total Nationwide 98 $130,630,354 $41,120,250

Total for Proposed Standards $54,895,527 $18,358,221

Incremental Nationwide Cost $75,734,827 $22,762,029

a 

# Unit costs from Holloway (2014a), except for the DLA capi tal and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table were increased to account for the fa ct that if a DLA is insta lled for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it would need to be installed ear lier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for all APCD for purposes of this analysis, a DLA was

expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other APCD, increasing the capital cost by about 3 percent

(calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 

# ). The total annual cost increased due to the

increase in the annual ized capital cost.21Table 15. Summary of Emission Reductions for the Non-Hg HAP Metals Beyond-the-Floor OptionCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEmissions Reductions (tpy)HFHClCl2HAPMetalsPMHgSO2PM2.5aDIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.00311 0 0Total 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.00932 0 0DIFF orDLS/FFRetrofitwith a DIFFLarge Unit 0.521 0.0594 0.00272 0.0458 4.17 0 1.39 2.00Total 2 1.043 0.1187 0.00545 0.0917 8.33 0 2.78 4.00DLA Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0 0 6.73Total 6 0 0 0 0.925 84.1 0 0 40.4DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0.00311 0 6.73Total 5 0 0 0 0.771 70.0 0.0155 0 33.6SD/ESP Retrofitwith a DIFFLarge Unit 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0Total 1 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55Total 4 0 0 0 0.783 71.2 0 0 34.2None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0.00311 0 8.55Total 10 0 0 0 1.96 178 0.0311 0 85.5None Install DLA Large Unit 33.0 1.42 0.0850 0.0417 3.79 0 22.7 1.82Total 11 363 15.6 0.935 0.458 41.7 0 249 20.0None Install FF Small Unit 0 0 0 0.0855 7.78 0 0 3.73Total 12 0 0 0 1.026 93.3 0 0 44.8None Install DLA Small Unit 14.4 0.620 0.0371 0.0182 1.65 0 9.90 0.794Total 44 635 27.3 1.633 0.801 72.8 0 436 34.9Total Nationwide 98 1,036 51.3 3.71 6.81 620 0.0559 689 297Total for Proposed Standards407 24.2 2.09 3.95 359 0.0590 255 173Incremental Nationwide Emissions 630 27.1 1.62 2.86 260 -0.0031 434 125aEstimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.22Table 16. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for the Non-Hg HAP Metals Beyond-the-Floor OptionaCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEnergyimpacts,MMBtu/yrSolidwasteimpacts,tpyWastewaterimpacts,gpySecondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)PMPM2.5CONOxSO2DIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 553 17.9 -- 0.00408 0.00137 0.00688 0.0547 0.159Total 3 1,659 53.8 0.0122 0.00410 0.0206 0.164 0.478DIFF orDLS/FFRetrofit witha DIFFLarge Unit 0 12.9 -- 0 0 0 0 0Total 2 0 25.7 0 0 0 0 0DLA Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8 -- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62Total 6 75,378 107 0.556 0.186 0.938 7.45 21.7DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 13,116 35.7 -- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78Total 5 65,580 179 0.484 0.162 0.816 6.48 18.9SD/ESP Retrofit witha DIFFLarge Unit -24,555 12.9 -4,063 -0.181 -0.0607 -0.305 -2.43 -7.07Total 1 -24,555 12.9 -4,063 -0.181 -0.0607 -0.305 -2.43 -7.07None Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8 -- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62Total 4 50,252 71.2 0.371 0.124 0.625 4.97 14.5None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 13,116 35.7 -- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78Total 10 131,159 357 0.97 0.324 1.63 13.0 37.8None Install DLA Large Unit 7,424 457 -- 0.0548 0.0184 0.0923 0.734 2.14Total 11 81,659 5,031 0.602 0.202 1.02 8.07 23.5None Install FF Small Unit 9,620 7.78 -- 0.071 0.0238 0.120 0.951 2.77Total 12 115,439 93.3 0.852 0.286 1.44 11.4 33.3None Install DLA Small Unit 3,741 306 -- 0.0276 0.00925 0.0465 0.370 1.08Total 44 164,607 13,453 1.21 0.407 2.05 16.3 47.4Total Nationwide 98 661,179 19,384 -4,063 4.88 1.64 8.22 65.4 190Total for Proposed Standards 316,842 6,335 -4,063 2.34 0.784 3.94 31.3 91.3Incremental Nationwide Impacts 344,336 13,048 0 2.54 0.852 4.28 34.0 99.2aA negative increase in secondary impacts would be equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

# 23 B. Hg Beyond-the-Floor Option

Step 1: Compare Test Da ta to Emission Limits

Table 17 shows the percentages for the be yond-the-floor Hg lb/ton and concentration

emission limits by kiln size.

Table 17. Percentages of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to Hg Beyond-the-Floor Limit

Kiln Size Number of Kiln

Stacks with Data Percentage of Kilns Meeting

lb/ton Limit Concentration

Limit At Least One

Limit

Large Kilns 18 16.7% 22.2% 27.8%

Small Kilns 1 100% 100% 100%



# Step 2: Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

For the Hg beyond-the-floor option, the percen tages from Table 17 were applied to the

kilns in Table 4 for Hg emissions, and the percenta ges from Table 5 were applied to the kilns in

Table 4 for non-Hg HAP metals/PM emissions. From these estimates, preliminary estimates of

the number of APCD needed to be installed were developed using same crit eria as described in

Section V of this memorandum.

Table 18 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of APCD needed for the Hg

beyond-the-floor option based only on these criteria and the pe rcentages in Tables 4 and 17,

rounded to the nearest whole number. If multiple kilns were vented together, only one APCD

was assigned to the stack.

# 24 Table 18. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Preliminary Estimate of APCD

to be Installed for the Hg Beyond-the-Floor Option

Kiln Size Existing APCD

Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

PM Limit Number

of Kiln

Stacks

Meeting

Hg Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install FF Install FF

with ACI Add ACI

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 7 a 

# 2 0 0 6

DLA 14 12 2 0 12 0

None 31 10 9 0 22 0

Small Kilns SD/ESP b 

# 1 0 1 0 0 0

None 78 49 78 29 0 0

Total 132 79 108 29 32 6

a 

# Because the one kiln stack not meeting the PM lb/ton or concentration limits is already controlled with a PM APCD,

none of the preliminary assumptions apply. If this kiln stack cannot meet the lb/hr non-Hg HAP metals limit, or if it is

not located at a facility that could become a synthetic ar ea source by installing a DLA on an uncontrolled kiln, the

DIFF or DLS/FF would have to be retrofit with a new DIFF.

b 

# The SD/ESP is expected to be replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum).



# Step 3: Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

considering the impact of th e proposed total non-Hg HAP meta ls lb/hr limit and the beyond-thefloor Hg lb/hr limit, as well as the number of kiln s located at facilities that could elect to become

synthetic area sources. As noted previously in this memorandum, because test data are not

available for every tunnel kiln in the industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each kiln

and facility. Therefore, the pr eliminary APCD estimates in Table 18, the lb/hr limits, and the

ability of certain facilities to become synthetic area were considered together on a more general

basis. The following assumptions were used to refine the preliminary APCD estimates:

 For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it was assumed that the kiln stack not meeting

either the proposed PM lb/ton or concentra tion limits would meet the proposed total

non-Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit.

 For large kilns with a DLA, it was expect ed that the kiln stacks not meeting the

beyond-the-floor Hg lb/ton or concentrati on limits would also not meet the beyondthe-floor Hg lb/hr limit, due to the st ringency of the beyond-the-floor Hg limits.

 Based on the results of the analysis desc ribed in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 12 large uncontrolled k iln stacks are located at f acilities that could become

synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stacks. Because the

beyond-the-floor Hg limits are more string ent than the proposed Hg limits, more

facilities would be expected to install one or more DLA to become a synthetic area

source. Therefore, for large uncontrolled kilns, it was assumed that owners or

operators of 11 of those kiln stacks, or two more than under the proposed standards,

would elect to install a DLA. It was expected that nine of these 11 are the same kiln

stacks located at facilities that would install a DLA as in Section V of this

# 25 memorandum and that the other two kiln stacks would not meet the proposed Hg

limit.

 Because all small uncontrolled kilns are pr ojected to meet the beyond-the-floor Hg

limit, and the PM and non-Hg HAP metals limits are the same as the proposed

standards, the same refinements describe d in Section V of this memorandum were

applied to small uncontrolled kilns for the Hg beyond-the-floor option.

The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 19.

Table 19. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Estimate of APCD to be

Installed for the Hg Beyond-the-Floor Option

Kiln Size Existing

APCD Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add

ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a 

# No

Change

in APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 0 0 6 0 0 2

DLA 14 0 12 0 0 0 2

None 31 0 17 0 0 11 3

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 

# 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 78 3 0 0 0 5 70

Total 132 3 29 6 1 16 77

a 

# See Section IV of this memorandum.



# Step 4: Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide co sts and impacts for the non-Hg HAP metals

beyond-the-floor option was to apply model APCD costs, emission reductions, and secondary

impacts to the APCD counts shown in Table 19. The model APCD size is based on the design

capacity(ies) of the kiln(s) routed to that emi ssion point/APCD. For example, two small kilns

vented together with a total desi gn capacity of less than 10 tph would be controlled with a small

APCD, whereas two small kilns vented together th at have a total design capacity of more than

10 tph would be controlled with a large APCD.

As noted in Section IV of this memorandum , for purposes of this analysis, the DIFF

installed to replace the SD/ESP at Belden Brick Company’s facility in Sugarcreek, Ohio would

be a large DIFF. It was also expected that one of the FF shown in Table 19 for small kilns would

be controlling multiple kilns and would therefore be a large FF. The remaining APCD shown in

Table 19 would be sized for one kiln.

For the Hg beyond-the-floor option, Table 20 shows the summary of nationwide costs,

Table 21 shows the summary of nationwide emission reductions, and Table 22 shows the

summary of nationwide secondary impacts. Based on the incremental annual cost in Table 20

and the incremental non-Hg HAP metals emission re ductions in Table 21, the cost effectiveness

of the Hg beyond-the-floor option is $148 m illion per additional ton of Hg reduced.

# 26 Table 20. Summary of Nationwide Costs for the Hg Beyond-the-Floor Option

Current

APCD Action APCD Size Unit

Capital

Cost a 

# Unit

Annual

Cost a 

# Number

of

APCD Total

Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $112,768 6 $880,180 $676,609

DLA Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 0 $0 $0

DLA Install FF with

ACI Large $1,646,697 $638,774 12 $19,760,360 $7,665,293

SD/ESP Retrofit with a

DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,585 1 $3,820,000 $943,585

None Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 1 $1,500,000 $526,006

None Install FF with

ACI Large $1,646,697 $638,774 17 $27,993,843 $10,859,166

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $409,722 11 $16,385,023 $4,506,944

None Install FF Small $1,200,000 $437,845 2 $2,400,000 $875,690

None Install DLA Small $1,096,473 $310,036 5 $5,482,363 $1,550,180

Total Nationwide 55 $78,221,768 $27,603,473

Total for Proposed Standards $54,895,527 $18,358,221

Incremental Nationwide Cost $23,326,241 $9,245,253

a 

# Unit costs from Holloway (2014a), except for the DLA capi tal and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table were increased to account for the fa ct that if a DLA is insta lled for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it would need to be installed ear lier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for all APCD for purposes of this analysis, a DLA was

expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other APCD, increasing the capital cost by about 3 percent

(calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 

# ). The total annual cost increased due to the

increase in the annual ized capital cost.27Table 21. Summary of Nationwide Emission Reductions for the Hg Beyond-the-Floor OptionCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEmissions Reductions (tpy)HFHClCl2HAPMetalsPMHgSO2PM2.5aDIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.00347 0 0Total 6 0 0 0 0 0 0.02084 0 0DLA Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0 0 6.73Total 0 0 0 0 0 0000DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0.00347 0 6.73Total 12 0 0 0 1.85 168.2 0.0417 0 80.7SD/ESP Retrofitwith a DIFFLarge Unit 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0Total 1 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55Total 1 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0.00347 0 8.55Total 17 0 0 0 3.33 303 0.0590 0 145None Install DLA Large Unit 33.0 1.42 0.0850 0.0417 3.79 0 22.7 1.82Total 11 363 15.6 0.935 0.458 41.7 0 249 20.0None Install FF Small Unit 0 0 0 0.0855 7.78 0 0 3.73Total 2 0 0 0 0.171 15.6 0 0 7.46None Install DLA Small Unit 14.4 0.620 0.0371 0.0182 1.65 0 9.90 0.794Total 5 72.1 3.10 0.186 0.0910 8.27 0 49.5 3.97Total Nationwide 55 473 27.1 2.26 6.10 554 0.122 300 266Total for Proposed Standards407 24.2 2.09 3.95 359 0.0590 255 173Incremental Nationwide Emissions 66.1 2.84 0.170 2.14 195 0.0625 45.3 93.5aEstimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.28Table 22. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for the Hg Beyond-the-Floor OptionaCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEnergyimpacts,MMBtu/yrSolidwasteimpacts,tpyWastewaterimpacts,gpySecondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)PMPM2.5CONOxSO2DIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 553 27.3 -- 0.00408 0.00137 0.00688 0.0547 0.159Total 6 3,318 163.8 0.0245 0.00821 0.0413 0.328 0.956DLA Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8 -- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62Total 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 13,116 45.1 -- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78Total 12 157,391 541 1.16 0.389 1.96 15.6 45.3SD/ESP Retrofit witha DIFFLarge Unit -24,555 12.9 -4,063 -0.181 -0.0607 -0.305 -2.43 -7.07Total 1 -24,555 12.9 -4,063 -0.181 -0.0607 -0.305 -2.43 -7.07None Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8 -- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62Total 1 12,563 17.8 0.093 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 13,116 45.1 -- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78Total 17 222,971 767 1.64 0.552 2.77 22.0 64.2None Install DLA Large Unit 7,424 457 -- 0.0548 0.0184 0.0923 0.734 2.14Total 11 81,659 5,031 0.602 0.202 1.02 8.07 23.5None Install FF Small Unit 9,620 7.78 -- 0.071 0.0238 0.120 0.951 2.77Total 2 19,240 15.6 0.142 0.0476 0.239 1.90 5.54None Install DLA Small Unit 3,741 306 -- 0.0276 0.00925 0.0465 0.370 1.08Total 5 18,705 1,529 0.138 0.0463 0.233 1.85 5.39Total Nationwide 55 491,293 8,078 -4,063 3.62 1.22 6.11 48.6 142Total for Proposed Standards 316,842 6,335 -4,063 2.34 0.784 3.94 31.3 91.3Incremental Nationwide Impacts174,450 1,743 0 1.29 0.432 2.17 17.2 50.3aA negative increase in secondary impacts would be equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

# 29 VII. Cost and Emission Reduction Es timates for Meeting non-Hg HAP Metals

Alternative Standards

The alternative standards for non-Hg HAP me tals (with PM as a surrogate) and their

development are discussed in Maximum Achievable Control Tec hnology (MACT) Floor Analysis

for Brick and Structural Clay Products (Raymond and Sroka, 2014). The process to estimate

costs and emission reduction impacts for the altern ative standards was the same as the process

used for the proposed standards in Section V of this memorandum. Specifically, because test

data were not available for all k ilns in the industry, seve ral assumptions were needed to evaluate

the impacts on the whole industry.

Step 1: Compare Test Da ta to Emission Limits

The first step was to compare the data available with the alternative emission limits to get

an estimate of the percentage of tunnel kilns in the industry that could m eet the alternative limits

with current APCD configurat ions. Table 23 shows the percentages for the PM lb/ton and

concentration alternative emission limits by kiln size and the most common types of APCD (for

PM).

Table 23. Percentages of BSCP Tunnel Kiln Stacks at Major and Synthetic Area Sources

With Data Less Than or Equal to Alternative Emission Limits

Pollutant Kiln Size APCD Type Number of

Kiln Stacks

with Data a 

# Percentage of Kilns Meeting b



# lb/ton

Limit Concentration

Limit At Least

One Limit

PM Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 28 28.6% 82.1% 82.1%

DLA 30 3.33% 43.3% 43.3%

None 3 33.3% 33.3% 33.3%

Small Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 1 100% 100% 100%

DLA 0 ND ND ND

None 16 18.8% 18.8% 25.0%

a 

# PM data were also available for one stack controlled by a SD/ESP (small kilns) and three large kilns with wet

scrubbers. Those kilns are not shown in the counts fo r PM emissions data because the SD/ESP is expected to be

replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum) and all three wet scrubbers are located at synthetic area

sources, so the results for those APCD are not needed for purposes of estimating impacts on major source

facilities. In addition, the analysis does not assume that wet scrubbers would be installed or retrofitted to meet the

proposed PM standards. These kilns are included in the counts for Hg data; because none of the APCD currently

in use in the BSCP industry target Hg reductions, the ab ility to meet the Hg standards is not expected to be affected

by type of current APCD.

b 

# ND = no test data available for that pollutant, kiln size, and APCD combination.



# Of the large kilns with both PM and Hg data, five of the 18 kiln stacks meet at least one

of the alternative PM an d one of the proposed Hg limits (see Section V of this memorandum for

the Hg percentages).

# 30 Step 2: Develop Preliminary Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The percentages from Table 23 were applied to the kilns in Table 4 (see Section V of this

memorandum) to determine the number of kilns estim ated to be able to meet the alternative

limits. From these estimates, preliminary estima tes of the number of APCD needed to be

installed to meet the alternative limits were developed using the same criteria described in

Section V of this memorandum. Table 24 shows the preliminary estimate of the number of

APCD needed based only on these criteria and the percentages in Ta ble 23, rounded to the

nearest whole number. If multiple kilns were vented together, only one APCD was assigned to

the stack.

Table 24. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Preliminary Estimate of APCD

to be Installed to Meet Alternative Limits

Kiln Size Existing APCD

Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Number of

Kiln Stacks

Meeting

Alternative

PM Limit Number of

Kiln Stacks

Meeting

Proposed

Hg Limit Initial Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install FF Install FF

with ACI Add ACI

Large

Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 7 a 

# 4 0 0 4

DLA 14 5 8 3 6 0

None 31 10 17 7 14 0

Small

Kilns SD/ESP b 

# 1 0 1 0 0 0

None 78 20 78 58 0 0

Total 132 42 108 68 21 3

a 

# Because the one kiln stack not meeting the alternative PM lb/ton or concentration limits is already controlled with a

PM APCD, none of the preliminary assumptions apply. If th is kiln stack cannot meet the alternative lb/hr non-Hg

HAP metals limit, or if it is not locat ed at a facility that could become a synthetic area source by installing a DLA on

an uncontrolled kiln, the DIFF or DLS/FF would have to be retrofit with a new DIFF.

b 

# The SD/ESP is expected to be replaced with a DIFF (see Section IV of this memorandum).



# Step 3: Refine the Estimate of Number of APCD Needed

The next step in determining the number of APCD required to be installed included

considering the impact of the proposed Hg lb /hr limit and the altern ative total non-Hg HAP

metal lb/hr limit, as well as the number of kilns located at facilities that could elect to become

synthetic area sources. As noted previously in this memorandum, because test data are not

available for every tunnel kiln in the industry, compliance costs were not estimated for each kiln

and facility. Therefore, the pr eliminary APCD estimates in Table 24, the lb/hr limits, and the

ability of certain facilities to become synthetic area were considered together on a more general

basis. The following assumptions were used to refine the preliminary APCD estimates:

 For large kilns with a DIFF or DLS/FF, it was assumed that the kiln stack not meeting

either the alternative PM lb/ton or concen tration limits would meet the alternative

total non-Hg HAP metals lb/hr limit. It was also assumed that one of the kiln stacks

# 31 not meeting the proposed Hg lb/ton or con centration limits would meet the proposed

Hg lb/hr limit.

 For large kilns with a DLA, it was assumed that one of the kiln stacks not meeting the

proposed Hg lb/ton or concentration limits would meet the proposed Hg lb/hr limit. It

was also assumed that this kiln stack is not one of the five stacks that can meet one of

the alternative PM limits.

 Based on the results of the analysis desc ribed in Section III of this memorandum, a

total of 12 large uncontrolled k iln stacks are located at f acilities that could become

synthetic area sources with installation of a DLA on those stacks. Because the

alternative PM limits are more stringent th an the proposed PM limits, more facilities

would be expected to install one or more DLA to become a synthetic area source.

Therefore, for large uncontrolled kilns, it wa s assumed that owners or operators of 10

of those kiln stacks, or one more than under the proposed standards, would elect to

install a DLA.

 As with large kilns, because the alternativ e PM limits are more stringent than the

proposed PM limits, more facilities would be expected to install one or more DLA to

become a synthetic area source. However, it was still expected that many small

uncontrolled kilns would be able to meet the alternative tota l non-Hg HAP metals

lb/hr limit and would not need to install DL A to become a synthetic area source.

Therefore, for small uncontrolled kilns, it wa s assumed that a little over 25 percent of

the total kiln stacks, or 21 total stacks, were located at facilities that would elect to

become synthetic area sources by installing a DLA. It was also assumed that 26 of

the 37 remaining kiln stacks not meeting th e alternative PM lb/ton or concentration

limits (70 percent) would be able to meet the alternative tota l non-Hg HAP metals

lb/hr limit.

The final estimates of APCD counts are shown in Table 25.

Table 25. Summary of Major Source BSCP Kiln Stacks and Estimate of APCD to be

Installed to Meet Alternative Limits

Kiln Size Existing

APCD Type Number

of Kiln

Stacks Estimate of Kiln Stacks

Install

FF Install

FF with

ACI Add

ACI Retrofit

with a

DIFF Install

DLA a 

# No

Change

in APCD

Large Kilns DIFF or DLS/FF 8 0 0 3 0 0 5

DLA 14 4 5 0 0 0 5

None 31 1 10 0 0 10 10

Small Kilns SD/ESP a 

# 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

None 78 11 0 0 0 21 46

Total 132 16 15 3 1 31 66

a 

# See Section IV of this memorandum.

# 32 Step 4: Calculate the Nationwide Costs, Emission Reductions, and Secondary Impacts

The final step in estimating nationwide costs and impacts for the alternative limits was to

apply model APCD costs, emission reductions, and secondary impacts to the APCD counts

shown in Table 25. The model APCD size is ba sed on the design capacity(ies) of the kiln(s)

routed to that emission point/APCD. For example, two small kilns vented together with a total

design capacity of less than 10 tph would be c ontrolled with a small APCD, whereas two small

kilns vented together that have a total design cap acity of more than 10 tph would be controlled

with a large APCD.

As noted in Section IV of this memorandum , for purposes of this analysis, the DIFF

installed to replace the SD/ESP at Belden Brick Company’s facility in Sugarcreek, Ohio would

be a large DIFF. It was also expected that three of the 11 FF and one of the 21 DLA shown in

Table 25 for small kilns would be controlling mu ltiple kilns and would therefore be large FF and

a large DLA. The remaining APCD shown in Table 25 would be sized for one kiln.

Table 26 shows the summary of nationwide costs for major sources to meet the

alternative limits, Table 27 shows the summar y of nationwide emission reductions for major

sources to meet the alternativ e limits, and Table 28 shows the su mmary of nationwide secondary

impacts for major sources to meet the alternative limits.

Table 26. Summary of Nationwide Costs for Major Sources to Meet Alternative Limits

Current

APCD Action APCD

Size Unit

Capital

Cost a 

# Unit

Annual

Cost a 

# Number

of

APCD Total

Capital

Cost Total

Annual

Cost

DIFF or

DLS/FF Add ACI Large $146,697 $96,482 3 $440,090 $289,446

DLA Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 4 $6,000,000 $2,104,024

DLA Install FF with ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,488 5 $8,233,483 $3,112,440

SD/ESP Retrofit with a DIFF Large $3,820,000 $943,585 1 $3,820,000 $943,585

None Install FF Large $1,500,000 $526,006 4 $6,000,000 $2,104,024

None Install FF with ACI Large $1,646,697 $622,488 10 $16,466,966 $6,224,880

None Install DLA Large $1,489,548 $409,722 11 $16,385,023 $4,506,944

None Install FF Small $1,200,000 $437,845 8 $9,600,000 $3,502,760

None Install DLA Small $1,096,473 $310,036 20 $21,929,451 $6,200,721

Total Nationwide 66 $88,875,013 $28,988,824

a 

# Unit costs from Holloway (2014a), except for the DLA capi tal and annual costs. The DLA capital and annual costs

shown in this table were increased to account for the fa ct that if a DLA is insta lled for a facility to become a

synthetic area source, it would need to be installed ear lier than an APCD installed to comply with the BSCP

NESHAP. To compare the equivalent net present values for all APCD for purposes of this analysis, a DLA was

expected to be installed 6 months earlier than other APCD, increasing the capital cost by about 3 percent

(calculated assuming 7 percent interest over half a year, or 1.07 0.5 

# ). The total annual cost increased due to the

increase in the annual ized capital cost.33Table 27. Summary of Nationwide Emission Reductions for Major Sources to Meet Alternative LimitsCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEmissions Reductions (tpy)HFHClCl2HAPMetalsPMHgSO2PM2.5aDIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0.00311 0 0Total 3 0 0 0 0 0 0.00932 0 0DLA Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0 0 6.73Total 4 0 0 0 0.617 56.1 0 0 26.9DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.154 14.0 0.00311 0 6.73Total 5 0 0 0 0.77 70.1 0.0155 0 33.6SD/ESP Retrofitwith a DIFFLarge Unit 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0Total 1 37.3 8.35 1.14 0 0 0 1.39 0None Install FF Large Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0 0 8.55Total 4 0 0 0 0.783 71.2 0 0 34.2None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 0 0 0 0.196 17.8 0.00311 0 8.55Total 10 0 0 0 1.96 178 0.0311 0 85.5None Install DLA Large Unit 33.0 1.42 0.0850 0.0417 3.79 0 22.7 1.82Total 11 363 15.6 0.935 0.458 41.7 0 249 20.0None Install FF Small Unit 0 0 0 0.0855 7.78 0 0 3.73Total 8 0 0 0 0.684 62.2 0 0 29.9None Install DLA Small Unit 14.4 0.620 0.0371 0.0182 1.65 0 9.90 0.794Total 20 288 12.4 0.742 0.364 33.1 0 198 15.9Total Nationwide 66 689 36.3 2.82 5.64 512 0.0559 449 246aEstimated as 48 percent of PM reductions.34Table 28. Summary of Nationwide Secondary Impacts for Major Sources to Meet Alternative LimitsaCurrentAPCDActionAPCDSizeEmissionsTypeNumberofAPCDEnergyimpacts,MMBtu/yrSolidwasteimpacts,tpyWastewaterimpacts,gpySecondary Air Emissions Increase (tpy)PMPM2.5CONOxSO2DIFF orDLS/FFAdd ACI Large Unit 553 17.9 -- 0.00408 0.00137 0.00688 0.0547 0.159Total 3 1,659 53.8 0.0122 0.00410 0.0206 0.164 0.478DLA Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8 -- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62Total 4 50,252 71.2 0.371 0.1243 0.625 4.97 14.5DLA Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 13,116 35.7 -- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78Total 5 65,580 179 0.484 0.162 0.816 6.48 18.9SD/ESP Retrofit witha DIFFLarge Unit -24,555 12.9 -4,063 -0.181 -0.0607 -0.305 -2.43 -7.07Total 1 -24,555 12.9 -4,063 -0.181 -0.0607 -0.305 -2.43 -7.07None Install FF Large Unit 12,563 17.8 -- 0.0927 0.0311 0.156 1.24 3.62Total 4 50,252 71.2 0.371 0.1243 0.625 4.97 14.48None Install FFwith ACILarge Unit 13,116 35.7 -- 0.0968 0.0324 0.163 1.30 3.78Total 10 131,159 357 0.97 0.324 1.63 13.0 37.8None Install DLA Large Unit 7,424 457 -- 0.0548 0.0184 0.0923 0.734 2.14Total 11 81,659 5,031 0.602 0.202 1.016 8.07 23.5None Install FF Small Unit 9,620 7.78 -- 0.071 0.0238 0.120 0.951 2.77Total 8 76,959 62.2 0.568 0.1904 0.957 7.61 22.17None Install DLA Small Unit 3,741 306 -- 0.0276 0.00925 0.0465 0.370 1.08Total 20 74,822 6,115 0.552 0.1851 0.931 7.40 21.6Total Nationwide 66 507,787 11,954 -4,063 3.75 1.26 6.32 50.2 146aA negative increase in secondary impacts would be equivalent to a reduction in secondary impacts.

# 35 VIII. References

Holloway, T. 2014a. Methodology and Assumptions Used to Estimate the Model Costs and

Impacts of BSCP Air Pollution Control Devices . Memorandum from Thomas Holloway, RTI

International, to Jeff Telander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. July 9, 2014.

Holloway, T. 2014b. Updated BSCP Inventory Database and Documentation . Memorandum

from Thomas Holloway, RTI International, to Jeff Telander, EPA/OA QPS/SPPD. Date TBD.

Morris, M., T. Palma, and C. Sarsony. 2014. Risk Assessment to Determine a Health-Based

Emission Limitation for Acid Gases for th e Brick and Structural Clay Products

Manufacturing Source Category . Memorandum from Mark Morris, Ted Palma, and Chris

Sarsony, EPA/OAQPS/HEID, to Dock et EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0291. May 19, 2014.

Raymond, G. 2014. Test Data Used in BSCP Proposed Rule . Memorandum from Gabrielle

Raymond, RTI International, to Jeff Te lander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. July 26, 2014.

Raymond, G and K. Sroka. 2014. Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Floor

Analysis for Brick and Structural Clay Products . Memorandum from Gabrielle Raymond

and Kristin Sroka, RTI International, to Jeff Telander, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD. September 9,

2014.

# Appendix A

Analysis of the Cost to Facilities to Become Synthetic Area SourcesA-1Table A-1. Kiln ListKiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize502 ACME-3 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Bennett TunnelPlant (BTP)Millsap TX 15.98 8352 DLS/FF LCD507 ACME-8 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Elgin TX 10.00 8400 None LCD508 ACME-8 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Elgin TX 19.10 8760 DIFF LCD509 ACME-9 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 8760 None SCD510 ACME-9 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 1416 None SCD511 ACME-9 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 8760 None SCD512 ACME-12 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Holly Springs Plant(HSP)HollySpringsMS 8.45 8760 None SCD513 ACME-14 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Kanapolis Plant(KAP)Kanopolis KS 5.78 8760 None SCD500 ACME-1 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Springfield MN 6.25 7665 None SCD501 ACME-1 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Springfield MN 6.25 7665 None SCD515 ACME-18 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Malvern AR 9.66 8760 None SCD516 ACME-18 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Malvern AR 7.86 8760 None SCD518 ACME-20 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Malakoff TX 10.20 8760 DLA LCD519/520 ACME-20 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Malakoff TX 10.20 8760 None LCD521 ACME-21 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 8.51 8760 None SCDA-2Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize522 ACME-23 Acme BrickCompanyAcme- Wheeler Plant(WTP)Jonesboro AR 7.01 8760 None SCD523 2 American EagleBrick CoAmerican Eagle Brick Co SunlandParkNM 3.40 7000 None SCD526 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #2SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 10.65 8760 DIFF LCD527 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #3SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 13.70 8760 DIFF LCD528/529/530 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #6SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 15.96 8760 None LCD531/532/533 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #8SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 23.31 8760 SD/ESP LCD534/535 BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #9SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 6.10 8760 None SCD536 BELD-2 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 3.08 0 None SCD537/538 BORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 29.94 6264 DIFF LCD539 BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 8424 None LCD540 BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 8064 None LCD545 BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 8760 None LCD546 BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 7608 None LCD547/548 BORA-5 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #6 Bessemer AL 25.02 8016 DIFF LCD549 BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 8760 None SCD550 BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 8760 None SCD551/552 BORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 22.66 8760 DLA LCD558 BORA-13 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Muskogee Plant Muskogee OK 23.43 8256 DIFF LCD559 BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 8136 None LCD560 BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 7080 None LCD561 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 5664 None LCD562 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 8760 None LCDA-3Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize563 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 13.50 6744 None LCD566 BORA-17 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Salisbury Plant Salisbury NC 27.80 8760 DIFF LCD567 BORA-18 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Terre Haute Plant Terre Haute IN 26.00 8760 DIFF LCD699 181 CertainteedCorporationCertainteed CorporationLudowiciNewLexingtonOH 7.78 8760 None SCD575 19 Cherokee Brick& Tile CoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 6240 None SCD576 19 Cherokee Brick& Tile CoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 6240 None SCD577/578 19 Cherokee Brick& Tile CoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 29.48 6240 DLA LCD581 34 Columbus BrickCoColumbus Brick Company Columbus MS 7.90 7920 None SCD582 34 Columbus BrickCoColumbus Brick Company Columbus MS 7.90 7920 None SCD583 34 Columbus BrickCoColumbus Brick Company Columbus MS 18.30 7920 DLA LCD584 134 CommercialBrick CorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD585 134 CommercialBrick CorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD586 134 CommercialBrick CorpCommercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 4680 None LCD587 64 Continental BrickCoContinental BrickMartinsburgMartinsburg WV 8.35 7920 None SCD588 64 Continental BrickCoContinental BrickMartinsburgMartinsburg WV 8.35 7920 None SCD590 83 CunninghamBrick Company,IncCunningham- ClevelandCoGrover NC 9.08 7920 None SCDA-4Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize591 84 CunninghamBrick Company,IncCunningham- Thomasville Thomasville NC 11.55 7920 None LCD594 153 Elgin-Butler BrickCoElgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 7920 None SCD595 153 Elgin-Butler BrickCoElgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 7920 None SCD596 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 6720 None SCD597 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 6720 None SCD598 23 Endicott ClayProducts CoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 8.86 6720 None SCD599 158 General Finance,IncGeneral Finance- CloudCeramicsConcordia KS 6.17 4944 DIFF SCD605 GENE-5 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plant40Coosa GA 18.75 8760 DIFF LCD606 GENE-5 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plant40Coosa GA 18.75 8760 DIFF LCD612/613 GENE-8 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plants35 & 36Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 20.20 8760 DLA LCD614 GENE-8 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plants35 & 36Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 22.00 8760 DLA LCD615 GENE-9 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plants6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 3.68 8760 None SCD616 GENE-9 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plants6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 3.68 8760 None SCD617 GENE-9 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plants6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 15.02 8760 DLA LCD618 GENE-15 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- CorbinPlant 33Woodbine KY 9.9 0 None SCDA-5Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize619 GENE-15 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- CorbinPlant 33Woodbine KY 14.4 0 None LCD622/623 GENE-11 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 27.40 8760 None LCD624 GENE-11 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 20.55 8760 DLA LCD625 GENE-11 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 20.55 8760 DLA LCD626/627 GENE-12 General ShaleBrick, IncGeneral Shale RobinsonBrick Co.-Plant 2Denver CO 20.40 8760 DLA LCD635 GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerBigler PA 16.20 6225 None LCD636 GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerBigler PA 16.20 6225 None LCD637 GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaCaledonia OH 8.89 6408 None SCD638 GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaCaledonia OH 8.89 6408 None SCD639 GLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation -CapitolManassas VA 16.7 0 None LCD644 GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMarseilles IL 15.54 6648 DLA LCD645 GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMarseilles IL 15.96 6648 DLA LCD642 GLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationRedfieldRedfield IA 10.94 6552 None LCD648 GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkYork PA 11.24 7032 None LCD649 GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkYork PA 19.76 7896 DLA LCD650 HANS2 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Athens Athens TX 9.53 8760 None SCDA-6Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize671 HANS13 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant2Columbia SC 11.30 8352 None LCD672 HANS13 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant2Columbia SC 11.30 8352 None LCD673/674 HANS14 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant4Columbia SC 22.60 8280 DLA LCD652 HANS5 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Elgin Elgin TX 11.50 8760 None LCD653 HANS5 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Elgin Elgin TX 12.20 8760 DLS/FF LCD656 HANS7 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Mineral WellsEastMineralWellsTX 7.99 8760 None SCD662 HANS8 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson - Monroe Monroe NC 22.80 5832 DLA LCD663 HANS9 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Ninety Six Ninety-Six SC 8.90 7200 None SCD664 HANS9 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Ninety Six Ninety-Six SC 8.90 4944 None SCD665 HANS9 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Ninety Six Ninety-Six SC 8.90 2136 None SCD667 HANS11 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 6528 None LCD668 HANS11 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 6528 None LCD669 HANS12 Hanson BrickEast, LLCHanson- Stanton Stanton KY 8.00 8604 None SCD677 145 Hebron BrickCompanyHebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 9.60 7600 None SCD679 78 Henry BrickCompany, IncHenry Brick Selma AL 13.10 8760 DLA LCD680 78 Henry BrickCompany, IncHenry Brick Selma AL 13.10 8760 DLA LCDA-7Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize589 178NR InternationalChimney CorpContinental ClayKittanningKittanning PA 2.25 8760 None SCD704/705/706/707184 Ironrock Capital(formerlyMetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics,Inc.)Canton OH 13.32 7700 None LCD684 35 Acme BrickCompanyJenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 7080 None SCD685 35 Acme BrickCompanyJenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 7080 None SCD689 175NR Kansas Brickand Tile CoKansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 6.00 8760 None SCD690 104 Kasten ClayProducts CoKasten Clay Products Jackson MO 3.74 2288 None SCD703 139 L.P. McNearBrick Co, IncMcNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 8.20 6800 None SCD693 135 Lee Brick andTile CoLee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.24 7840 None LCD694 135 Lee Brick andTile CoLee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 9.64 7840 None SCD695 135 Lee Brick andTile CoLee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.67 7840 None LCD696 135 Lee Brick andTile CoLee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 13.50 7840 DLA LCD701 50 MarionCeramics, IncMarion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 3.13 8760 None SCD702 42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 12.00 7920 None LCD592 MOHA-4 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 3.56 6024 None SCD593 MOHA-4 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 3.56 6024 None SCDA-8Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize178 MOHA-6 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.75 6024 None SCD180 MOHA-6 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.98 6024 None SCD179 MOHA-6 MohawkIndustriesDal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.98 6024 None SCD709 87 Mutual MaterialsCoMutual Materials-Mica Mica WA 9.60 7920 None SCD710 88 Mutual MaterialsCoMutual MaterialsNewcastleRenton WA 7.52 7080 None SCD711 68 Old Virginia BrickCoOld Virginia- MadisonHeightsMadisonHeightsVA 8.44 4800 None SCD712 69 Old Virginia BrickCoOld Virginia-Salem Salem VA 6.77 4800 None SCD713 69 Old Virginia BrickCoOld Virginia-Salem Salem VA 4.65 4800 None SCD714 176NR Pacific ClayProductsPacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 2.57 8760 None SCD715 176NR Pacific ClayProductsPacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 2.57 8760 None SCD716 176NR Pacific ClayProductsPacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 5.14 8760 None SCD727/728 137 Pine Hall BrickCo, IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.08 7880 None LCD729/730 137 Pine Hall BrickCo, IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 26.60 7880 DLA LCD731/732 137 Pine Hall BrickCo, IncPine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.20 7880 None LCD735 159 Ragland ClayProducts, LLCRagland Clay Products Ragland AL 3.36 6240 None SCD742 45 Richards BrickCoRichards Brick EdwardsvilleIL 4.62 2016 None SCDA-9Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize743 45 Richards BrickCoRichards Brick EdwardsvilleIL 4.62 2016 None SCD747 90 Sioux City Brickand Tile CoSioux City- Adel Plant Adel IA 13.10 7920 DLA LCD748 90 Sioux City Brickand Tile CoSioux City- Adel Plant Adel IA 16.37 7920 DIFF LCD749 140 Sioux City Brickand Tile CoSioux City- Sergeant BluffPlantSergeantBluffIA 11.45 7920 DLA LCD753 46 Statesville BrickCoStatesville Brick Statesville NC 11.00 5000 None LCD754 46 Statesville BrickCoStatesville Brick Statesville NC 9.35 5000 None SCD758 116 Summit PressedBrick and Tile CoSummit- Brick Plant andStorage YardPueblo CO 6.75 7056 None SCD759 186 SummitvilleTiles, Inc.Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD760 186 SummitvilleTiles, Inc.Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.24 6240 None SCD761 186 SummitvilleTiles, Inc.Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD762 186 SummitvilleTiles, Inc.Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 6240 None SCD766/767 49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- Merry OaksPlantMoncure NC 23.70 8760 DLA LCD768 49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- Merry OaksPlantMoncure NC 24.70 8760 DLA LCD769 TriWade Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- WadesboroPlantWadesboro NC 20.00 8760 DLA LCD770 TriWade Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- WadesboroPlantWadesboro NC 20.00 8760 DLA LCD773 124 WatsontownBrick CoWatsontown Brick WatsontownPA 7.98 8760 None SCDA-10Kiln IDFacility IDCompanyNameFacility NameCityStateCombinedDesignCapacity(tph)OperatingHoursAPCDAPCDSize774 124 WatsontownBrick CoWatsontown Brick WatsontownPA 10.00 8760 DIFF LCD775 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 11.90 8760 None LCD776 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 6.80 8760 None SCD777 147 Yankee Hill Brickand TileYankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 4.90 6240 None SCDA-11Table A-2. Emissions Estimates, Control Codes, and Test Data Codes by KilnKiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP502 0.001966 0.003634 0.002432 0.138 0.254 0.170 0.562 1 2507 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 26.2 3.54 0.151 29.9 0 0508 0.01797 0.1133 2.747E-05 1.50 9.48 0.00230 11.0 1 2509 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 10.5 1.41 0.0604 11.9 0 0510 1.148 0.08084 0.003458 20.1 1.41 0.0604 21.5 0 1511 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 10.5 1.41 0.0604 11.9 0 0512 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 22.1 2.99 0.128 25.3 0 0513 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 15.1 2.05 0.0875 17.3 0 0500 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 16.4 2.21 0.0947 18.7 0 0501 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 16.4 2.21 0.0947 18.7 0 0515 0.05800 0.5983 0.003458 25.3 2.45 0.146 27.9 0 1516 0.1507 0.08073 0.003458 5.19 2.78 0.119 8.09 0 2518 0.01393 0.1963 0.003458 0.622 8.77 0.109 9.50 1 2519/520 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 26.7 3.61 0.154 30.5 0 0521 1.316 0.2997 0.003458 49.1 11.2 0.129 60.4 0 2522 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 18.4 2.48 0.106 21.0 0 0523 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 8.91 1.20 0.0515 10.2 0 0526 0.04221 0.02940 0.006779 1.97 1.37 0.316 3.66 1 2527 0.07735 0.01228 0.0004661 4.64 0.737 0.0280 5.41 1 2528/529/530 0.5808 0.02998 0.003458 40.63 2.10 0.242 42.9 0 2531/532/533 0.8786 0.2142 0.02721 89.75 21.9 2.78 114 1 2534/535 0.5709 0.03509 0.003458 15.3 0.937 0.0924 16.3 0 2536 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 8.07 1.09 0.0467 9.21 0 0537/538 0.1054 0.007070 0.003458 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1 1 2539 0.2720 0.08084 0.003458 13.4 3.98 0.170 17.6 0 1540 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29.5 3.98 0.170 33.6 0 0A-12Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP545 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 31.4 4.25 0.182 35.9 0 0546 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 31.4 4.25 0.182 35.9 0 0547/548 0.003287 0.001474 0.0001577 0.360 0.161 0.0172 0.539 1 2549 0.6395 0.08084 0.003458 27.5 3.47 0.148 31.1 0 1550 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 25.7 3.47 0.148 29.3 0 0551/552 0.1412 0.07520 0.002629 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7 1 2558 0.0001778 0.003990 0.002432 0.0182 0.409 0.249 0.677 1 2559 0.2154 0.0969 0.003458 9.44 4.25 0.151 13.8 0 2560 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 26.2 3.54 0.151 29.9 0 0561 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29.4 3.97 0.170 33.5 0 0562 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29.4 3.97 0.170 33.5 0 0563 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 35.4 4.78 0.204 40.4 0 0566 0.004354 0.004170 0.02444 0.530 0.508 2.98 4.01 1 2567 0.0001714 0.01362 0.002432 0.0195 1.55 0.277 1.85 1 2699 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.4 2.75 0.118 23.3 0 0575 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 14.4 1.94 0.0830 16.4 0 0576 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 14.4 1.94 0.0830 16.4 0 0577/578 0.1275 0.07905 0.002432 16.5 10.2 0.315 27.0 1 2581 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.7 2.80 0.120 23.6 0 0582 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.7 2.80 0.120 23.6 0 0583 0.04519 0.04494 0.002441 3.62 3.60 0.196 7.42 1 2584 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 32.1 4.34 0.186 36.7 0 0585 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 32.1 4.34 0.186 36.7 0 0586 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 32.1 4.34 0.186 36.7 0 0587 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 21.9 2.96 0.126 25.0 0 0588 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 21.9 2.96 0.126 25.0 0 0590 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23.8 3.22 0.138 27.1 0 0A-13Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP591 0.4461 0.08084 0.003458 22.6 4.09 0.175 26.8 0 1594 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 4.01 0.542 0.0232 4.57 0 0595 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 4.01 0.542 0.0232 4.57 0 0596 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23.6 3.19 0.136 26.9 0 0597 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23.6 3.19 0.136 26.9 0 0598 0.2357 0.08084 0.003458 9.15 3.14 0.134 12.4 0 1599 0.04606 0.009585 0.002432 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57 1 2605 0.04933 0.08224 0.002432 4.05 6.75 0.200 11.0 1 2606 0.1454 0.05536 0.0001111 11.9 4.55 0.00913 16.5 1 2612/613 0.005068 0.05985 0.002441 0.448 5.30 0.216 5.96 1 1614 0.1079 0.2017 0.002441 10.4 19.4 0.235 30.1 1 2615 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.64 1.30 0.0557 11.0 0 0616 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.64 1.30 0.0557 11.0 0 0617 0.03709 0.05985 0.002441 2.44 3.94 0.161 6.54 1 0618 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 25.9 3.51 0.150 29.6 0 0619 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 37.7 5.10 0.218 43.1 0 0622/623 0.0863 0.08084 0.003458 10.4 9.70 0.415 20.5 0 1624 0.03709 0.05985 0.002441 3.34 5.39 0.220 8.95 1 0625 0.003011 0.02776 0.002441 0.271 2.50 0.220 2.99 1 2626/627 0.03709 0.05985 0.002441 3.31 5.35 0.218 8.88 1 0635 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 42.5 5.74 0.245 48.4 0 0636 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 42.5 5.74 0.245 48.4 0 0637 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23.3 3.15 0.135 26.6 0 0638 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23.3 3.15 0.135 26.6 0 0639 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 43.8 5.91 0.253 49.9 0 0644 0.008043 0.1204 0.002441 0.547 8.20 0.166 8.91 1 2645 0.01136 0.0859 0.002441 0.794 6.01 0.171 6.97 1 2A-14Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP642 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 28.7 3.87 0.166 32.7 0 0648 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29.5 3.98 0.170 33.6 0 0649 0.05011 0.02146 0.002441 4.34 1.86 0.211 6.41 1 2650 0.5304 0.1577 0.003458 22.1 6.58 0.144 28.9 0 2671 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29.6 4.00 0.171 33.8 0 0672 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 29.6 4.00 0.171 33.8 0 0673/674 0.03830 0.01529 0.002441 3.79 1.51 0.242 5.55 1 2652 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 30.1 4.07 0.174 34.4 0 0653 0.001581 0.004446 0.0001515 0.0845 0.238 0.00809 0.330 1 2656 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.9 2.83 0.121 23.9 0 0662 0.002162 0.03491 0.002441 0.216 3.49 0.244 3.95 1 2663 0.5385 0.08084 0.003458 21.0 3.15 0.135 24.3 0 1664 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 23.3 3.15 0.135 26.6 0 0665 0.4985 0.08084 0.003458 19.4 3.15 0.135 22.7 0 1667 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 27.5 3.72 0.159 31.4 0 0668 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 27.5 3.72 0.159 31.4 0 0669 0.7923 0.08084 0.003458 27.8 2.83 0.121 30.7 0 1677 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 25.2 3.40 0.145 28.7 0 0679 0.002381 0.03804 0.002441 0.137 2.18 0.140 2.46 1 2680 0.003030 0.02956 0.002441 0.174 1.70 0.140 2.01 1 2589 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 5.90 0.797 0.0341 6.73 0 0704/705/706/7070.4127 0.08084 0.003458 24.1 4.72 0.202 29.0 0 1684 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 24.9 3.36 0.144 28.4 0 0685 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 24.9 3.36 0.144 28.4 0 0689 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 15.7 2.12 0.0909 17.9 0 0690 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.81 1.33 0.0567 11.2 0 0703 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 21.5 2.90 0.124 24.5 0 0A-15Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP693 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 32.1 4.33 0.185 36.6 0 0694 0.5041 0.08084 0.003458 21.3 3.41 0.146 24.8 0 1695 0.5748 0.01090 0.003458 31.9 0.605 0.192 32.7 0 2696 0.003947 0.1005 0.002441 0.233 5.94 0.144 6.32 1 2701 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 8.21 1.11 0.0474 9.366 0 0702 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 31.4 4.25 0.182 35.9 0 0592 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.33 1.26 0.0539 10.6 0 0593 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 9.33 1.26 0.0539 10.6 0 0178 0.7925 0.02329 0.003458 6.07 0.179 0.0265 6.28 0 2180 0.4491 0.02326 0.003458 3.89 0.202 0.0300 4.13 0 2179 0.3862 0.02031 0.003458 3.35 0.176 0.0300 3.56 0 2709 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 25.2 3.40 0.145 28.7 0 0710 1.068 0.08084 0.003458 35.2 2.66 0.114 38.0 0 1711 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 22.1 2.99 0.128 25.2 0 0712 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 17.7 2.40 0.103 20.2 0 0713 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 12.2 1.65 0.0704 13.9 0 0714 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 6.74 0.910 0.0389 7.68 0 0715 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 6.74 0.910 0.0389 7.68 0 0716 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 13.5 1.82 0.0779 15.4 0 0727/728 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 50.0 6.76 0.289 57.0 0 0729/730 0.02108 0.01165 0.002441 2.46 1.36 0.284 4.10 1 2731/732 0.4038 0.09573 0.003458 34.0 8.05 0.291 42.3 0 2735 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 8.81 1.19 0.0509 10.0 0 0742 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 12.1 1.64 0.0700 13.8 0 0743 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 12.1 1.64 0.0700 13.8 0 0747 0.03709 0.05985 0.002441 2.13 3.43 0.140 5.70 1 0748 0.03888 0.02798 0.002432 2.79 2.01 0.174 4.97 1 0A-16Kiln IDEmission Factors from TestData (lb/ton)Average Emission Factors(lb/ton)Kiln Emissions (tpy)ControlCodeTestDataCodeHFHClCl2HFHClCl2HFHClCl2TotalHAP749 0.03709 0.05985 0.002441 1.86 3.00 0.122 4.98 1 0753 0.2944 0.08084 0.003458 14.2 3.89 0.167 18.2 0 1754 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 24.5 3.31 0.142 28.0 0 0758 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 17.7 2.39 0.102 20.2 0 0759 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 2.91 0.393 0.0168 3.32 0 0760 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 3.25 0.439 0.0188 3.71 0 0761 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 2.91 0.393 0.0168 3.32 0 0762 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 2.91 0.393 0.0168 3.32 0 0766/767 0.008777 0.01987 0.002441 0.911 2.06 0.253 3.23 1 2768 0.004627 0.01136 0.002441 0.501 1.23 0.264 1.99 1 2769 0.005255 0.02585 0.002441 0.460 2.26 0.214 2.94 1 2770 0.005066 0.02280 0.002441 0.444 2.00 0.214 2.65 1 2773 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 20.9 2.83 0.121 23.9 0 0774 0.03888 0.02798 0.002432 1.70 1.23 0.107 3.03 1 0775 0.1319 0.009590 0.0003769 6.87 0.500 0.0196 7.39 0 2776 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 17.8 2.41 0.103 20.3 0 0777 0.5983 0.08084 0.003458 12.8 1.73 0.0742 14.6 0 0A-17Table A-3. Facility Status Based on Current Emissions EstimatesFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateFacility Emissions (tpy)CurrentStatusHFHClCl2TotalHAPACME-3 Acme Brick Company Acme- Bennett Tunnel Plant (BTP) Millsap TX 0.138 0.254 0.170 0.562 SyntheticAreaACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 27.7 13.0 0.154 40.9 MajorACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 41.0 4.24 0.181 45.4 MajorACME-12 Acme Brick Company Acme- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) Holly Springs MS 22.1 2.99 0.128 25.3 MajorACME-14 Acme Brick Company Acme- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) Kanopolis KS 15.1 2.05 0.0875 17.3 MajorACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) Springfield MN 32.8 4.43 0.189 37.4 MajorACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 30.5 5.23 0.265 36.0 MajorACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) Malakoff TX 27.4 12.4 0.264 40.0 MajorACME-21 Acme Brick Company Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 49.1 11.2 0.129 60.4 MajorACME-23 Acme Brick Company Acme- Wheeler Plant (WTP) Jonesboro AR 18.4 2.48 0.106 21.0 Major2 American Eagle Brick Co American Eagle Brick Co Sunland Park NM 8.91 1.20 0.0515 10.2 MajorBELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant #2Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 152 27.0 3.46 183 MajorBELD-2 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 8.07 1.09 0.0467 9.21 MajorBORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1 MajorBORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 42.9 7.97 0.341 51.2 MajorBORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 62.9 8.50 0.364 71.8 MajorBORA-5 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #6 Bessemer AL 0.360 0.162 0.0173 0.539 SyntheticAreaBORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 53.1 6.94 0.297 60.4 MajorBORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7 MajorBORA-13 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Muskogee Plant Muskogee OK 0.0182 0.409 0.250 0.677 SyntheticAreaBORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 35.6 7.79 0.303 43.7 MajorBORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 94.1 12.7 0.544 107 MajorBORA-17 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Salisbury Plant Salisbury NC 0.530 0.508 2.98 4.01 SyntheticAreaA-18FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateFacility Emissions (tpy)CurrentStatusHFHClCl2TotalHAPBORA-18 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Terre Haute Plant Terre Haute IN 0.0195 1.55 0.277 1.85 SyntheticArea181 Certainteed Corporation Certainteed Corporation- Ludowici New Lexington OH 20.4 2.75 0.118 23.3 Major19 Cherokee Brick & Tile Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 45.2 14.1 0.481 59.8 Major34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 45.0 9.20 0.435 54.7 Major134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 96.4 13.0 0.557 110 Major64 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick- Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 43.8 5.91 0.253 49.9 Major83 Cunningham BrickCompany, IncCunningham- Cleveland Co Grover NC 23.8 3.22 0.138 27.1 Major84 Cunningham BrickCompany, IncCunningham- Thomasville Thomasville NC 22.6 4.09 0.175 26.8 Major153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 8.02 1.08 0.0463 9.15 Major23 Endicott Clay Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 56.3 9.51 0.407 66.2 Major158 General Finance, Inc General Finance- Cloud Ceramics Concordia KS 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57 SyntheticAreaGENE-5 General Shale Brick, Inc General ShaleBrick-Plant 40 Coosa GA 16.0 11.3 0.209 27.5 MajorGENE-8 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plants 35 & 36 Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 10.8 24.7 0.451 36.0 MajorGENE-9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 Atkins (Marion) VA 21.7 6.54 0.272 28.5 MajorGENE-15 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale-Corbin-Plant 33 Woodbine KY 63.7 8.60 0.368 72.7 MajorGENE-11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale- Moncure Facility Moncure NC 14.0 17.6 0.854 32.4 MajorGENE-12 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Robinson Brick Co.-Plant 2Denver CO 3.31 5.35 0.218 8.88 SyntheticAreaGLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Bigler Bigler PA 84.9 11.5 0.491 96.9 MajorGLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Caledonia Caledonia OH 46.6 6.30 0.269 53.2 MajorGLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation - Capitol Manassas VA 43.8 5.91 0.253 49.9 MajorGLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Marseilles Marseilles IL 1.34 14.2 0.337 15.9 MajorGLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Redfield Redfield IA 28.7 3.87 0.166 32.7 MajorGLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-York York PA 33.8 5.84 0.382 40.0 MajorHANS2 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Athens Athens TX 22.1 6.58 0.144 28.9 MajorA-19FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateFacility Emissions (tpy)CurrentStatusHFHClCl2TotalHAPHANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Columbia - Plant 2 Columbia SC 59.2 8.00 0.342 67.6 MajorHANS14 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Columbia - Plant 4 Columbia SC 3.79 1.51 0.242 5.55 SyntheticAreaHANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Elgin Elgin TX 30.2 4.31 0.182 34.7 MajorHANS7 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Mineral Wells East Mineral Wells TX 20.9 2.83 0.121 23.9 MajorHANS8 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson - Monroe Monroe NC 0.216 3.49 0.244 3.95 SyntheticAreaHANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- NinetySix Ninety-Six SC 63.7 9.45 0.404 73.6 MajorHANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 55.0 7.44 0.318 62.8 MajorHANS12 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Stanton Stanton KY 27.8 2.83 0.121 30.7 Major145 Hebron Brick Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 25.2 3.40 0.145 28.7 Major78 Henry Brick Company, Inc Henry Brick Selma AL 0.310 3.88 0.280 4.47 SyntheticArea178NR International Chimney Corp Continental Clay- Kittanning Kittanning PA 5.90 0.797 0.0341 6.73 SyntheticArea184 Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics, Inc.)Canton OH 24.1 4.72 0.202 29.0 Major35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 49.8 6.73 0.288 56.8 Major175NR Kansas Brick and Tile Co Kansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 15.7 2.12 0.0909 17.9 Major104 Kasten Clay Products Co Kasten Clay Products Jackson MO 9.81 1.33 0.0567 11.2 Major139 L.P. McNear Brick Co, Inc McNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 21.5 2.90 0.124 24.5 Major135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 85.5 14.3 0.668 100 Major50 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 8.21 1.11 0.0474 9.37 Major42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 31.4 4.25 0.182 35.9 MajorMOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 18.7 2.52 0.108 21.3 MajorMOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky Lewisport KY 13.3 0.556 0.0865 14.0 Major87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials-Mica Mica WA 25.2 3.40 0.145 28.7 Major88 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials-Newcastle Renton WA 35.2 2.66 0.114 38.0 Major68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Madison Heights MadisonHeightsVA 22.1 2.99 0.128 25.2 MajorA-20FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateFacility Emissions (tpy)CurrentStatusHFHClCl2TotalHAP69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia-Salem Salem VA 29.9 4.04 0.173 34.1 Major176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore CA 26.9 3.64 0.156 30.7 Major137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 86.4 16.2 0.864 103 Major159 Ragland Clay Products,LLCRagland Clay Products Ragland AL 8.81 1.19 0.0509 10.0 Major45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 24.2 3.27 0.140 27.6 Major90 Sioux City Brick and Tile Co Sioux City- Adel Plant Adel IA 4.92 5.44 0.314 10.7 SyntheticArea140 Sioux City Brick and Tile Co Sioux City- Sergeant Bluff Plant Sergeant Bluff IA 1.86 3.00 0.122 4.98 SyntheticArea46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 38.7 7.21 0.308 46.2 Major116 Summit Pressed Brick andTile CoSummit- Brick Plant and StorageYardPueblo CO 17.7 2.39 0.102 20.2 Major186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant Minerva OH 12.0 1.62 0.0692 13.7 Major49 Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- Merry Oaks Plant Moncure NC 1.41 3.29 0.517 5.22 SyntheticAreaTriWade Triangle Brick Triangle Brick- Wadesboro Plant Wadesboro NC 0.904 4.26 0.428 5.59 SyntheticArea124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 22.6 4.05 0.227 26.9 MajorWhit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 24.7 2.91 0.123 27.7 Major147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Yankee Hill Brickand Tile Lincoln NE 12.8 1.73 0.0742 14.6 MajorA-21Table A-4. Potential Kiln Control and Estimated Emissions for Major Source KilnsKiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP507 None Install DLA LCD 1.31 2.48 0.106 3.89508 DIFF None LCD 1.50 9.48 0.00230 11.0509 None Install DLA SCD 0.523 0.989 0.0423 1.55510 None Install DLA SCD 1.00 0.989 0.0423 2.03511 None Install DLA SCD 0.523 0.989 0.0423 1.55512 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 2.09 0.0896 3.29513 None Install DLA SCD 0.757 1.43 0.0613 2.25500 None Install DLA SCD 0.819 1.55 0.0663 2.43501 None Install DLA SCD 0.819 1.55 0.0663 2.43515 None Install DLA SCD 1.27 1.72 0.102 3.09516 None Install DLA SCD 0.259 1.95 0.0833 2.29518 DLA None LCD 0.622 8.77 0.109 9.51519/520 None Install DLA LCD 1.34 2.53 0.108 3.97521 None Install DLA SCD 2.45 7.82 0.0902 10.4522 None Install DLA SCD 0.919 1.74 0.0743 2.73523 None Install DLA SCD 0.446 0.843 0.0360 1.32526 DIFF None LCD 1.97 1.37 0.316 3.66527 DIFF None LCD 4.64 0.737 0.0280 5.41528/529/530 None Install DLA LCD 2.03 1.47 0.169 3.67531/532/533 SD/ESP None LCD 89.7 21.9 2.78 114534/535 None Install DLA SCD 0.763 0.656 0.0647 1.48536 None Install DLA SCD 0.404 0.763 0.0327 1.20537/538 DIFF None LCD 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1539 None Install DLA LCD 0.670 2.79 0.119 3.58540 None Install DLA LCD 1.47 2.79 0.119 4.38545 None Install DLA LCD 1.57 2.97 0.127 4.67546 None Install DLA LCD 1.57 2.97 0.127 4.67549 None Install DLA SCD 1.37 2.43 0.104 3.91A-22Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP550 None Install DLA SCD 1.28 2.43 0.104 3.82551/552 DLA None LCD 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7559 None Install DLA LCD 0.472 2.97 0.106 3.55560 None Install DLA LCD 1.31 2.48 0.106 3.89561 None Install DLA LCD 1.47 2.78 0.119 4.36562 None Install DLA LCD 1.47 2.78 0.119 4.36563 None Install DLA LCD 1.77 3.35 0.143 5.26699 None Install DLA SCD 1.02 1.93 0.0825 3.03575 None Install DLA SCD 0.718 1.36 0.0581 2.13576 None Install DLA SCD 0.718 1.36 0.0581 2.13577/578 DLA None LCD 16.5 10.2 0.315 27.0581 None Install DLA SCD 1.04 1.96 0.0838 3.08582 None Install DLA SCD 1.04 1.96 0.0838 3.08583 DLA None LCD 3.62 3.60 0.196 7.42584 None Install DLA LCD 1.61 3.04 0.130 4.78585 None Install DLA LCD 1.61 3.04 0.130 4.78586 None Install DLA LCD 1.61 3.04 0.130 4.78587 None Install DLA SCD 1.09 2.07 0.0885 3.25588 None Install DLA SCD 1.09 2.07 0.0885 3.25590 None Install DLA SCD 1.19 2.25 0.0963 3.54591 None Install DLA LCD 1.13 2.86 0.122 4.11594 None Install DLA SCD 0.200 0.379 0.0162 0.596595 None None SCD 4.01 0.542 0.0232 4.57596 None Install DLA SCD 1.18 2.23 0.0954 3.51597 None Install DLA SCD 1.18 2.23 0.0954 3.51598 None Install DLA SCD 0.457 2.20 0.0939 2.75599 DIFF None SCD 1.24 0.259 0.0657 1.57605 DIFF None LCD 4.05 6.75 0.200 11.0606 DIFF None LCD 11.9 4.55 0.00913 16.5A-23Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP612/613 DLA None LCD 0.448 5.30 0.216 5.96614 DLA None LCD 10.4 19.4 0.235 30.1615 None Install DLA SCD 0.482 0.912 0.0390 1.43616 None Install DLA SCD 0.482 0.912 0.0390 1.43617 DLA None LCD 2.44 3.94 0.161 6.54618 None Install DLA SCD 1.30 2.45 0.105 3.86619 None Install DLA LCD 1.89 3.57 0.153 5.61622/623 None Install DLA LCD 0.518 6.79 0.291 7.60624 DLA None LCD 3.34 5.39 0.220 8.95625 DLA None LCD 0.271 2.50 0.220 2.99635 None Install DLA LCD 2.12 4.02 0.172 6.31636 None Install DLA LCD 2.12 4.02 0.172 6.31637 None Install DLA SCD 1.16 2.20 0.0943 3.46638 None Install DLA SCD 1.16 2.20 0.0943 3.46639 None Install DLA LCD 2.19 4.14 0.177 6.50644 DLA None LCD 0.547 8.20 0.166 8.91645 DLA None LCD 0.794 6.01 0.171 6.97642 None Install DLA LCD 1.43 2.71 0.116 4.26648 None Install DLA LCD 1.47 2.79 0.119 4.38649 DLA None LCD 4.34 1.86 0.211 6.41650 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 4.61 0.101 5.82671 None Install DLA LCD 1.48 2.80 0.120 4.40672 None Install DLA LCD 1.48 2.80 0.120 4.40652 None Install DLA LCD 1.51 2.85 0.122 4.48653 DLS/FF None LCD 0.0845 0.238 0.00809 0.330656 None Install DLA SCD 1.05 1.98 0.0847 3.11663 None Install DLA SCD 1.05 2.21 0.0944 3.35664 None Install DLA SCD 1.17 2.21 0.0944 3.47665 None Install DLA SCD 0.972 2.21 0.0944 3.27A-24Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP667 None Install DLA LCD 1.38 2.60 0.111 4.09668 None Install DLA LCD 1.38 2.60 0.111 4.09669 None Install DLA SCD 1.39 1.98 0.0848 3.46677 None Install DLA SCD 1.26 2.38 0.102 3.74589 None None SCD 5.90 0.797 0.0341 6.73704/705/706/707 None Install DLA LCD 1.20 3.30 0.141 4.65684 None Install DLA SCD 1.24 2.35 0.101 3.70685 None Install DLA SCD 1.24 2.35 0.101 3.70689 None Install DLA SCD 0.786 1.49 0.0636 2.34690 None Install DLA SCD 0.490 0.928 0.0397 1.46703 None Install DLA SCD 1.07 2.03 0.0869 3.19693 None Install DLA LCD 1.60 3.03 0.130 4.77694 None Install DLA SCD 1.06 2.39 0.102 3.56695 None Install DLA LCD 1.59 0.423 0.134 2.15696 DLA None LCD 0.233 5.94 0.144 6.32701 None Install DLA SCD 0.410 0.776 0.0332 1.22702 None Install DLA LCD 1.57 2.97 0.127 4.67592 None Install DLA SCD 0.466 0.882 0.0377 1.39593 None Install DLA SCD 0.466 0.882 0.0377 1.39178 None Install DLA SCD 0.304 0.125 0.0186 0.447180 None None SCD 3.89 0.202 0.0300 4.13179 None None SCD 3.35 0.176 0.0300 3.56709 None Install DLA SCD 1.26 2.38 0.102 3.74710 None Install DLA SCD 1.76 1.86 0.0798 3.70711 None Install DLA SCD 1.11 2.09 0.0895 3.29712 None Install DLA SCD 0.887 1.68 0.0718 2.64713 None Install DLA SCD 0.609 1.15 0.0493 1.81714 None Install DLA SCD 0.337 0.637 0.0272 1.00715 None Install DLA SCD 0.337 0.637 0.0272 1.00A-25Kiln IDCurrent APCDPotential Action to beSynthetic AreaAPCD SizeKiln Emissions with Potential Control (tpy)HFHClCl2Total HAP716 None Install DLA SCD 0.674 1.27 0.0545 2.00727/728 None Install DLA LCD 2.50 4.73 0.202 7.43729/730 DLA None LCD 2.46 1.36 0.284 4.10731/732 None Install DLA LCD 1.70 5.64 0.204 7.54735 None Install DLA SCD 0.440 0.833 0.0356 1.31742 None Install DLA SCD 0.605 1.15 0.0490 1.80743 None Install DLA SCD 0.605 1.15 0.0490 1.80749 DLA None LCD 1.86 3.00 0.122 4.98753 None Install DLA LCD 0.709 2.73 0.117 3.55754 None Install DLA SCD 1.23 2.32 0.0991 3.64758 None Install DLA SCD 0.884 1.67 0.0716 2.63759 None None SCD 2.91 0.393 0.0168 3.32760 None Install DLA SCD 0.162 0.307 0.0131 0.483761 None Install DLA SCD 0.145 0.275 0.0118 0.432762 None Install DLA SCD 0.145 0.275 0.0118 0.432773 None Install DLA SCD 1.05 1.98 0.0847 3.11774 DIFF None LCD 1.70 1.23 0.107 3.03775 None Install DLA LCD 0.344 0.350 0.0138 0.707776 None Install DLA SCD 0.891 1.69 0.0721 2.65777 None Install DLA SCD 0.642 1.21 0.0519 1.91A-26Table A-5. Potential Facility Status and Cost Based on Installation of DLA for Current Major SourcesFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAPACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Major 2.81 12.0 0.108 14.9 Major $0 $0ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant(EBP)Major 2.05 2.97 0.127 5.14 SyntheticArea$3,289,418 $930,108ACME-12 Acme Brick Company Acme- Holly SpringsPlant (HSP)Major 1.11 2.09 0.0896 3.29 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036ACME-14 Acme Brick Company Acme- Kanapolis Plant(KAP)Major 0.757 1.43 0.0613 2.25 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036ACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Major 1.64 3.10 0.133 4.87 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,072ACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Major 1.53 3.66 0.186 5.37 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,072ACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Major 1.96 11.3 0.217 13.5 Major $0 $0ACME-21 Acme Brick Company Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Major 2.45 7.82 0.0902 10.4 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036ACME-23 Acme Brick Company Acme- Wheeler Plant(WTP)Major 0.919 1.74 0.0743 2.73 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,0362 American Eagle BrickCoAmerican Eagle Brick Co Major 0.446 0.843 0.0360 1.32 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036BELD-1 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant #2SugarcreekMajor 99.1 26.1 3.36 129 Major $0 $0BELD-2 Belden BrickCompanyBelden- Plant 1 Strasburg Major 0.404 0.763 0.0327 1.20 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036BORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Major 13.8 0.927 0.319 15.1 Major $0 $0BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Major 2.14 5.58 0.239 7.96 SyntheticArea$2,979,095 $819,444BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Major 3.14 5.95 0.254 9.35 Major $0 $0BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Major 2.66 4.86 0.208 7.72 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,072A-27FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAPBORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Major 14.0 7.46 0.261 21.7 Major $0 $0BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Major 1.78 5.45 0.212 7.44 SyntheticArea$2,979,095 $819,444BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Major 4.70 8.90 0.381 14.0 Major $0 $0181 CertainteedCorporationCertainteed CorporationLudowiciMajor 1.02 1.93 0.0825 3.03 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03619 Cherokee Brick & TileCoCherokee Brick & Tile Major 17.9 12.9 0.431 31.3 Major $0 $034 Columbus Brick Co Columbus BrickCompanyMajor 5.69 7.52 0.363 13.6 Major $0 $0134 Commercial BrickCorpCommercial Brick Corp Major 4.82 9.12 0.390 14.3 Major $0 $064 Continental Brick Co Continental BrickMartinsburgMajor 2.19 4.14 0.177 6.50 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,07283 Cunningham BrickCompany, IncCunningham- ClevelandCoMajor 1.19 2.25 0.0963 3.54 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03684 Cunningham BrickCompany, IncCunninghamThomasvilleMajor 1.13 2.86 0.122 4.11 SyntheticArea$1,489,548 $409,722153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Major 4.21 0.921 0.0394 5.17 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03623 Endicott Clay ProductsCoEndicott Clay Products Major 2.82 6.66 0.285 9.76 Major $0 $0GENE-5 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale Brick-Plant40Major 16.0 11.3 0.209 27.5 Major $0 $0GENE-8 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 35 & 36Major 10.8 24.7 0.451 36.0 Major $0 $0GENE-9 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Major 3.40 5.76 0.239 9.40 Major $0 $0GENE-15 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale- CorbinPlant 33Major 3.18 6.02 0.258 9.46 Major $0 $0A-28FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAPGENE-11 General Shale Brick,IncGeneral Shale- MoncureFacilityMajor 4.13 14.7 0.730 19.5 Major $0 $0GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerMajor 4.25 8.03 0.344 12.6 Major $0 $0GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaMajor 2.33 4.41 0.189 6.93 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,072GLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation -CapitolMajor 2.19 4.14 0.177 6.50 SyntheticArea$1,489,548 $409,722GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMajor 1.34 14.2 0.337 15.9 Major $0 $0GLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationRedfieldMajor 1.43 2.71 0.116 4.26 SyntheticArea$1,489,548 $409,722GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkMajor 5.81 4.64 0.330 10.8 SyntheticArea$1,489,548 $409,722HANS2 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Athens Major 1.11 4.61 0.101 5.82 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036HANS13 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Columbia - Plant2Major 2.96 5.60 0.240 8.80 Major $0 $0HANS5 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Elgin Major 1.59 3.09 0.130 4.81 SyntheticArea$1,489,548 $409,722HANS7 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Mineral WellsEastMajor 1.05 1.98 0.0847 3.11 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036HANS9 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Ninety Six Major 3.19 6.62 0.283 10.1 Major $0 $0HANS11 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Roseboro Major 2.75 5.21 0.223 8.18 Major $0 $0HANS12 Hanson Brick East,LLCHanson- Stanton Major 1.39 1.98 0.0848 3.46 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036145 Hebron BrickCompanyHebron Brick Plant Major 1.26 2.38 0.102 3.74 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036A-29FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAP184 Ironrock Capital(formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics,Inc.)Major 1.20 3.30 0.141 4.65 SyntheticArea$1,489,548 $409,72235 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Major 2.49 4.71 0.201 7.40 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,072175NR Kansas Brick and TileCoKansas Brick and Tile Major 0.786 1.49 0.0636 2.34 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036104 Kasten Clay ProductsCoKasten Clay Products Major 0.490 0.928 0.0397 1.46 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036139 L.P. McNear Brick Co,IncMcNear Brickyard Major 1.07 2.03 0.0869 3.19 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Major 4.50 11.8 0.511 16.8 Major $0 $050 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Major 0.410 0.776 0.0332 1.22 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03642 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Major 1.57 2.97 0.127 4.67 SyntheticArea$1,489,548 $409,722MOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette,AlabamaMajor 0.933 1.76 0.0755 2.77 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,072MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyMajor 7.55 0.503 0.0785 8.13 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03687 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials-Mica Major 1.26 2.38 0.102 3.74 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03688 Mutual Materials Co Mutual MaterialsNewcastleMajor 1.76 1.86 0.0798 3.70 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03668 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- MadisonHeightsMajor 1.11 2.09 0.0895 3.29 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03669 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia-Salem Major 1.50 2.83 0.121 4.45 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,072176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreMajor 1.35 2.55 0.109 4.00 SyntheticArea$3,289,418 $930,108137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall- Madison Plant Major 6.65 11.7 0.690 19.1 Major $0 $0A-30FacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCurrentStatusFacility Emissions withPotential Control (tpy)Status WithPotentialControlCapitalCostAnnualCostHFHClCl2TotalHAP159 Ragland ClayProducts, LLCRagland Clay Products Major 0.440 0.833 0.0356 1.31 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,03645 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Major 1.21 2.29 0.0980 3.60 SyntheticArea$2,192,945 $620,07246 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Major 1.93 5.04 0.216 7.19 SyntheticArea$2,586,020 $719,758116 Summit Pressed Brickand Tile CoSummit- Brick Plant andStorage YardMajor 0.884 1.67 0.0716 2.63 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMajor 3.36 1.25 0.0535 4.67 SyntheticArea$3,289,418 $930,108124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Major 2.75 3.20 0.191 6.14 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Major 1.23 2.04 0.0858 3.36 SyntheticArea$2,586,020 $719,758147 Yankee Hill Brick andTileYankee Hill Brick and Tile Major 0.642 1.21 0.0519 1.91 SyntheticArea$1,096,473 $310,036

# Appendix B

Cost and Emission Reduction Estimate s for Meeting Health -Based StandardsB-1Table B-1. Acid Gas Emissions and Calculated HCl-Equivalent Emissions for Major Source KilnsaKilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent(lb/hr)b507 ACME-8 Acme- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) 10.00 None5.960.8080.034613.9508 ACME-8 Acme- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) 19.10 DIFF 0.268 1.83 0.000401 2.27509 ACME-9 Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.210.3230.01388.18510 ACME-9 Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.210.3230.01388.18511 ACME-9 Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) 3.99 None 4.210.3230.01388.18512 ACME-12 Acme- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) 8.45 None5.030.6830.029211.8513 ACME-14 Acme- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) 5.78 None3.440.4670.02008.05500 ACME-1 Acme- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) 6.25 None3.720.5050.02168.71501 ACME-1 Acme- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) 6.25 None3.720.5050.02168.71515 ACME-18 Acme- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) 9.66 None 0.983 0.3100.03346.17516 ACME-18 Acme- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) 7.86 None 0.983 0.5270.02725.56518 ACME-20 Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 10.20 DLA 0.142 2.000.02495.53519 ACME-20 Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 5.10 None3.040.4120.01767.10520 ACME-20 Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) 5.10 None3.040.4120.01767.10521 ACME-21 Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) 8.51 None 11.2 2.550.029422.5522 ACME-23 Acme- Wheeler Plant (WTP) 7.01 None4.180.5670.02429.76523 2 American Eagle Brick Co 3.40 None2.030.2750.01184.74526 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #2 Sugarcreek 10.65 DIFF 0.344 0.191 0.0551 8.03527 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #3 Sugarcreek 13.70 DIFF 0.707 0.0960 0.00332 1.55528 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 2.97 0.1430.01846.83529 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 2.97 0.1430.01846.83530 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #6 Sugarcreek 5.32 None 1.03 0.06320.01843.99531 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 4.49 1.09 0.139 26.0532 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 5.12 1.25 0.159 29.7533 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #8 Sugarcreek 7.77 SD/ESP 5.12 1.25 0.159 29.7534 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #9 Sugarcreek 3.05 None 1.41 0.08670.01053.51B-2KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent(lb/hr)b535 BELD-1 Belden- Plant #9 Sugarcreek 3.05 None 1.41 0.08670.01053.51536 BELD-2 Belden- Plant 1 Strasburg 3.08 None1.830.2490.01074.29537 BORA-1 Boral- Atlanta Plant 14.97 DIFF 0.548 0.04170.03645.68538 BORA-1 Boral- Atlanta Plant 14.97 DIFF 1.85 0.1190.03647.62539 BORA-2 Boral- Augusta Plant 6 11.25 None 2.540.9090.03899.73540 BORA-2 Boral- Augusta Plant 6 11.25 None 2.540.9090.03899.73545 BORA-4 Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 12.00 None7.150.9700.041516.7546 BORA-4 Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 12.00 None7.150.9700.041516.7549 BORA-6 Boral- Gleason Plant 9.80 None 3.770.7920.033910.7550 BORA-6 Boral- Gleason Plant 9.80 None 3.770.7920.033910.7551 BORA-7 Boral- Henderson Facility 11.33 DLA 1.45 0.789 0.0275 6.53552 BORA-7 Boral- Henderson Facility 11.33 DLA 1.45 0.789 0.0275 6.53559 BORA-14 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 10.00 None 2.77 1.250.03469.81560 BORA-14 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 10.00 None 2.77 1.250.03469.81561 BORA-15 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 13.50 None8.041.090.046718.8562 BORA-15 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 11.20 None6.670.9050.038715.6563 BORA-15 Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 11.20 None6.670.9050.038715.6699 181 Certainteed Corporation- Ludowici 7.78 None4.630.6290.026910.8575 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 5.48 None3.260.4430.01907.63576 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 5.48 None3.260.4430.01907.63577 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 14.74 DLA 1.98 1.270.03608.89578 19 Cherokee Brick & Tile 14.74 DLA 2.07 1.240.03608.99581 34 Columbus Brick Company 7.90 None4.710.6390.027311.0582 34 Columbus Brick Company 7.90 None4.710.6390.027311.0583 34 Columbus Brick Company 18.30 DLA 0.610 0.6070.04477.43584 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None7.300.9910.042417.1585 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None7.300.9910.042417.1586 134 Commercial Brick Corp 12.26 None7.300.9910.042417.1587 64 Continental Brick- Martinsburg 8.35 None4.970.6750.028911.6B-3KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent(lb/hr)b588 64 Continental Brick- Martinsburg 8.35 None4.970.6750.028911.6590 83 Cunningham- Cleveland Co 9.08 None5.410.7340.031412.6591 84 Cunningham- Thomasville 11.55 None 4.280.9340.039912.4592 MOHA-4 Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama 3.56 None2.120.2880.01234.96593 MOHA-4 Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama 3.56 None2.120.2880.01234.96178 MOHA-6 Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.75 None 1.66 0.04870.006053.22179 MOHA-6 Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.98 None 0.699 0.03680.006851.95180 MOHA-6 Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky 1.98 None 0.844 0.04370.006852.16594 153 Elgin Butler Plant 1.53 None0.9110.1240.005292.13595 153 Elgin Butler Plant 1.53 None0.9110.1240.005292.13596 23 Endicott Clay Products 9.00 None5.360.7280.031112.5597 23 Endicott Clay Products 9.00 None5.360.7280.031112.5598 23 Endicott Clay Products 8.86 None 1.400.7160.03066.79605 GENE-5 General Shale Brick-Plant 40 18.75 DIFF 0.810 1.40 0.00187 2.80606 GENE-5 General Shale Brick-Plant 40 18.75 DIFF 2.69 0.916 0.00187 5.00612 GENE-8 General Shale Brick-Plants 35 & 36 10.10 DLA 0.03750.6050.02473.95613 GENE-8 General Shale Brick-Plants 35 & 36 10.10 DLA 0.03750.6050.02473.95614 GENE-8 General Shale Brick-Plants 35 & 36 22.00 DLA 1.85 3.420.053713.2615 GENE-9 General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 3.68 None2.190.2970.01275.13616 GENE-9 General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 3.68 None2.190.2970.01275.13617 GENE-9 General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 15.02 DLA0.5570.8990.03676.58618 GENE-15 General Shale- Corbin-Plant 33 9.90 None5.900.8000.034213.8619 GENE-15 General Shale- Corbin-Plant 33 14.40 None8.581.160.049820.1622 GENE-11 General Shale- Moncure Facility 13.70 None 0.9821.110.04748.83623 GENE-11 General Shale- Moncure Facility 13.70 None 0.9821.110.04748.83624 GENE-11 General Shale- Moncure Facility 20.55 DLA 0.0600 0.5530.05027.33625 GENE-11 General Shale- Moncure Facility 20.55 DLA 0.0600 0.5530.05027.33635 GLEN-1 Glen-Gery Corporation-Bigler 16.20 None9.651.310.056022.6636 GLEN-1 Glen-Gery Corporation-Bigler 16.20 None9.651.310.056022.6B-4KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent(lb/hr)b637 GLEN-2 Glen-Gery Corporation-Caledonia 8.89 None5.300.7190.030712.4638 GLEN-2 Glen-Gery Corporation-Caledonia 8.89 None5.300.7190.030712.4639 GLEN-3 Glen-Gery Corporation-Capitol 16.70 None9.951.350.057723.3644 GLEN-8 Glen-Gery Corporation-Marseilles 15.54 DLA 0.120 1.800.03797.03645 GLEN-8 Glen-Gery Corporation-Marseilles 15.96 DLA 0.181 1.360.03906.81642 GLEN-5 Glen-Gery Corporation-Redfield 10.94 None6.520.8840.037815.2648 GLEN-10 Glen-Gery Corporation-York 11.24 None6.690.9090.038915.7649 GLEN-10 Glen-Gery Corporation-York 19.76 DLA 0.599 0.2570.04827.54650 HANS2 Hanson- Athens 9.53 None 5.25 1.560.033013.5671 HANS13 Hanson- Columbia - Plant 2 11.30 None6.730.9140.039115.7672 HANS13 Hanson- Columbia - Plant 2 11.30 None6.730.9140.039115.7652 HANS5 Hanson- Elgin 11.50 None 0.0176 0.04290.03985.37653 HANS5 Hanson- Elgin 12.20 DLS/FF 0.00550 0.02600.02973.99656 HANS7 Hanson- Mineral Wells East 7.99 None4.760.6460.027611.1663 HANS9 Hanson- Ninety Six 8.90 None 4.150.7190.030810.7664 HANS9 Hanson- Ninety Six 8.90 None 4.390.7190.030811.1665 HANS9 Hanson- Ninety Six 8.90 None 4.390.7190.030811.1667 HANS11 Hanson- Roseboro 10.50 None6.250.8490.036314.6668 HANS11 Hanson- Roseboro 10.50 None6.250.8490.036314.6669 HANS12 Hanson- Stanton 8.00 None 5.990.6470.027712.9677 145 Hebron Brick Plant 9.60 None 0.03000.7760.03325.25704 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)3.33 None 0.8610.2690.01153.03705 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)3.33 None 0.8610.2690.01153.03706 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)3.33 None 1.430.2690.01153.84707 184 Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)3.33 None 1.050.2690.01153.30684 35 Jenkins- Coosaada Plant 9.50 None11.31.540.065726.5B-5KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent(lb/hr)b685 35 Jenkins- Coosaada Plant 9.50 None11.31.540.065726.5689 175NR Kansas Brick and Tile 6.00 None3.570.4850.02078.36690 104 Kasten Clay Products 3.74 None2.230.3030.01295.21693 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 12.24 None7.290.9890.042317.0694 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 9.64 None 3.930.7790.033310.8695 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 12.67 None 5.80 0.1100.043814.2696 135 Lee Brick Sanford Facility 13.50 DLA 0.0433 1.100.03305.56701 50 Marion Ceramics 3.13 None1.870.2530.01084.36702 42 McAvoy Brick 12.00 None7.150.9700.041516.7703 139 McNear Brickyard 8.20 None4.880.6630.028411.4709 87 Mutual Materials-Mica 9.60 None5.720.7760.033213.4710 88 Mutual Materials-Newcastle 7.52 None 6.670.6080.026013.6711 68 Old Virginia- Madison Heights 8.44 None5.030.6820.029211.8712 69 Old Virginia-Salem 6.77 None4.030.5470.02349.43713 69 Old Virginia-Salem 4.65 None2.770.3760.01616.48714 176NR Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore 2.57 None1.530.2080.008893.58715 176NR Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore 2.57 None1.530.2080.008893.58716 176NR Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore 5.14 None3.060.4160.01787.16727 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 9.54 None5.680.7710.033013.3728 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 9.54 None5.680.7710.033013.3729 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 13.30 DLA 0.285 0.1380.03254.87730 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 13.30 DLA 0.239 0.1530.03254.82731 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 9.60 None 3.19 0.7600.03329.75732 137 Pine Hall- Madison Plant 9.60 None 3.19 0.7600.03329.75735 159 Ragland Clay Products 3.36 None2.000.2720.01164.68742 45 Richards Brick 4.62 None2.750.3730.01606.43743 45 Richards Brick 4.62 None2.750.3730.01606.43753 46 Statesville Brick 11.00 None 2.890.8890.038010.1754 46 Statesville Brick 9.35 None5.570.7560.032313.0B-6KilnIDFacilityIDFacility NameKiln DesignCapacity(tph)APCDHFEmissions(lb/hr)HClEmissions(lb/hr)Cl2Emissions(lb/hr)Total HClEquivalent(lb/hr)b758 116 Summit- Brick Plant and Storage Yard 6.75 None4.020.5460.02339.40759 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant 1.11 None0.6610.08970.003841.55760 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant 1.24 None0.7390.1000.004291.73761 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant 1.11 None0.6610.08970.003841.55762 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant 1.11 None0.6610.08970.003841.55773 124 Watsontown Brick 7.98 None4.760.6450.027611.1774 124 Watsontown Brick 10.00 DIFF0.3890.2800.02434.08775 Whit Whitacre Greer 11.90 None7.090.9620.041216.6776 Whit Whitacre Greer 6.80 None4.050.5500.02359.47777 147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile 4.90 None2.920.3960.01696.82aValues in plain font are lb/hr emissions from test data. Values in bold italic underlined font were calculated by multiplyingemission factors by APCD and the kilndesign capacity.bHCl-equivalent emissions calculated using the equation in Section IV of this memorandum.B-7Table B-2. Total Facility HCl-Equivalent EmissionsFacility IDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateTotal HClEquivalent (lb/hr)ACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant (ELP/ENP) Elgin TX 16.2ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 24.5ACME-12 Acme Brick Company Acme- Holly Springs Plant (HSP) Holly Springs MS 11.8ACME-14 Acme Brick Company Acme- Kanapolis Plant (KAP) Kanopolis KS 8.05ACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant (AOP) Springfield MN 17.4ACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant (PEP/PWP) Malvern AR 11.7ACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant (TCP) Malakoff TX 19.7ACME-21 Acme Brick Company Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 22.5ACME-23 Acme Brick Company Acme- Wheeler Plant (WTP) Jonesboro AR 9.762 American Eagle Brick Co American Eagle Brick Co Sunland Park NM 4.74BELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden- Sugarcreek Sugarcreek OH 120BELD-2 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 4.29BORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 13.3BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 19.5BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 33.4BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 21.4BORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 13.1BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 19.6BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 50.0181 Certainteed Corporation Certainteed Corporation- Ludowici New Lexington OH 10.819 Cherokee Brick & Tile Co Cherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 33.234 Columbus Brick Co ColumbusBrick Company Columbus MS 29.4134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 51.264 Continental Brick Co Continental Brick- Martinsburg Martinsburg WV 23.383 Cunningham Brick Company, Inc Cunningham- Cleveland Co Grover NC 12.684 Cunningham Brick Company, Inc Cunningham- Thomasville Thomasville NC 12.4MOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 9.92MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport, Kentucky Lewisport KY 7.33B-8Facility IDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateTotal HClEquivalent (lb/hr)153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 4.2623 Endicott Clay Products Co Endicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 31.9GENE-5 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plant 40 Coosa GA 7.80GENE-8 General Shale Brick, Inc General ShaleBrick-Plants 35 & 36 Blue Ridge (Roanoke) VA 21.1GENE-9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plants 6 & 28 Atkins (Marion) VA 16.8GENE-15 General Shale Brick, Inc GeneralShale- Corbin-Plant 33 Woodbine KY 33.8GENE-11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale- Moncure Facility Moncure NC 32.3GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Bigler Bigler PA 45.1GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Caledonia Caledonia OH 24.8GLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Capitol Manassas VA 23.3GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Marseilles Marseilles IL 13.8GLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-Redfield Redfield IA 15.2GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery Corporation-York York PA 23.2HANS2 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Athens Athens TX 13.5HANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Columbia - Plant 2 Columbia SC 31.5HANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Elgin Elgin TX 9.36HANS7 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Mineral Wells East Mineral Wells TX 11.1HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Ninety Six Ninety-Six SC 32.9HANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 29.2HANS12 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Stanton Stanton KY 12.9145 Hebron Brick Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 5.25184 Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Canton OH 13.235 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 52.9175NR Kansas Brick and Tile Co Kansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 8.36104 Kasten Clay Products Co Kasten Clay Products Jackson MO 5.21135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 47.750 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 4.3642 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 16.7139 L.P. McNear Brick Co, Inc McNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 11.4B-9Facility IDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateTotal HClEquivalent (lb/hr)87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials-Mica Mica WA 13.488 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials-Newcastle Renton WA 13.668 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- Madison Heights Madison Heights VA 11.869 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia-Salem Salem VA 15.9176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay Products- Lake Elsinore Lake Elsinore CA 14.3137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 55.8159 Ragland Clay Products, LLC Ragland Clay Products Ragland AL 4.6845 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 12.946 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 23.1116 Summit Pressed Brick and Tile Co Summit- Brick Plant and Storage Yard Pueblo CO 9.40186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva Plant Minerva OH 6.37124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 15.2Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 26.0147 Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Yankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 6.82

# Appendix C

Estimate of Non-Hg HAP Metal s Emissions (lb/hr) by KilnC-1Table C-1. Estimate of Non-Hg HAP Metals Emissions by KilnKiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)507 ACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Elgin TX 10.00 None 0.324a3.24b0.0356c508 ACME-8 Acme Brick Company Acme- Elgin Plant(ELP/ENP)Elgin TX 19.10 DIFF 0.0100 0.161 0.00271509 ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324a1.29b0.0142c510 ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324a1.29b0.0142c511 ACME-9 Acme Brick Company Acme- Eureka Plant (EBP) Clarksville AR 3.99 None 0.324a1.29b0.0142c512 ACME-12 Acme Brick Company Acme- Holly Springs Plant(HSP)HollySpringsMS 8.45 None 0.324a2.74b0.0301c513 ACME-14 Acme Brick Company Acme- Kanapolis Plant(KAP)Kanopolis KS 5.78 None 0.324a1.87b0.0206c500 ACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Springfield MN 6.25 None 0.324a2.02b0.0223c501 ACME-1 Acme Brick Company Acme- Ochs Brick Plant(AOP)Springfield MN 6.25 None 0.324a2.02b0.0223c515 ACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Malvern AR 9.66 None 0.292d2.82b0.0310c516 ACME-18 Acme Brick Company Acme- Perla Plant(PEP/PWP)Malvern AR 7.86 None 0.292 1.90 0.0209e518 ACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Malakoff TX 10.20 DLA 0.106 1.08 0.0119e519/520 ACME-20 Acme Brick Company Acme- Texas Clay Plant(TCP)Malakoff TX 10.20 None 0.324a3.30b0.0363c521 ACME-21 Acme Brick Company Acme- Tulsa Plant (TUP) Tulsa OK 8.51 None 0.231 1.97 0.0216e522 ACME-23 Acme Brick Company Acme- Wheeler Plant(WTP)Jonesboro AR 7.01 None 0.324a2.27b0.0250c523 2 American Eagle BrickCoAmerican Eagle Brick Co SunlandParkNM 3.40 None 0.324a1.10b0.0121cC-2Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)526 BELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant #2SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 10.65 DIFF 0.0697 0.519 0.00115527 BELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant #3SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 13.70 DIFF 0.0770 0.649 0.00372528/529/530BELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant #6SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 15.96 None 0.391 4.02 0.0443e531/532/533BELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant #8SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 23.31 SD/ESP 0.111 2.23 0.0246e534/535 BELD-1 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant #9SugarcreekSugarcreek OH 6.10 None 0.664 3.28 0.0361e536 BELD-2 Belden Brick Company Belden- Plant 1 Strasburg Strasburg OH 3.08 None 0.324a0.997b0.0110c537/538 BORA-1 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Atlanta Plant Smyrna GA 29.94 DIFF 0.00868 0.204 0.00224e539 BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 None 0.282 2.63 0.0289e540 BORA-2 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Augusta Plant 6 Augusta GA 11.25 None 0.282d2.63 0.0289e545 BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 None 0.324a3.89b0.0427c546 BORA-4 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Bessemer Plant #5 Bessemer AL 12.00 None 0.324a3.89b0.0427c549 BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 None 0.0196 0.116 0.00127e550 BORA-6 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Gleason Plant Gleason TN 9.80 None 0.0196d0.116 0.00127e551/552 BORA-7 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Henderson Facility Henderson TX 22.66 DLA 0.553 11.4 0.125e559 BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 None 0.324a3.24b0.0356c560 BORA-14 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 3 Phenix City AL 10.00 None 0.324a3.24b0.0356c561 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 None 0.324a3.63b0.0399c562 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 11.20 None 0.324a3.63b0.0399c563 BORA-15 Boral Bricks Inc. Boral- Phenix City-Plant 4 Phenix City AL 13.50 None 0.324a4.37b0.0481c699 181 Certainteed Corporation Certainteed CorporationLudowiciNewLexingtonOH 7.78 None 0.324a2.52b0.0277c575 19 Cherokee Brick & TileCoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 None 0.324a1.77b0.0195cC-3Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)576 19 Cherokee Brick & TileCoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 5.48 None 0.324a1.77b0.0195c577/578 19 Cherokee Brick & TileCoCherokee Brick & Tile Macon GA 29.48 DLA 0.241 7.93 0.0872e581 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 7.90 None 0.324a2.56b0.0281c582 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 7.90 None 0.324a2.56b0.0281c583 34 Columbus Brick Co Columbus Brick Company Columbus MS 18.30 DLA 0.0477 0.643 0.00708e584 134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324a3.97b0.0437c585 134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324a3.97b0.0437c586 134 Commercial Brick Corp Commercial Brick Corp Wewoka OK 12.26 None 0.324a3.97b0.0437c587 64 Continental Brick Co Continental BrickMartinsburgMartinsburg WV 8.35 None 0.324a2.70b0.0297c588 64 Continental Brick Co Continental BrickMartinsburgMartinsburg WV 8.35 None 0.324a2.70b0.0297c590 83 Cunningham BrickCompany, IncCunningham- ClevelandCoGrover NC 9.08 None 0.324a2.94b0.0323c591 84 Cunningham BrickCompany, IncCunningham- Thomasville Thomasville NC 11.55 None 0.324a3.74b0.0411c592 MOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 3.56 None 0.324a1.15b0.0127c593 MOHA-4 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Fayette, Alabama Fayette AL 3.56 None 0.324a1.15b0.0127c178 MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.75 None 0.243 0.508 0.00559e179 MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.98 None 0.313 0.566 0.00623e180 MOHA-6 Mohawk Industries Dal-Tile, Lewisport,KentuckyLewisport KY 1.98 None 0.183 0.344 0.00378e594 153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 None 0.324a0.495b0.00545c595 153 Elgin-Butler Brick Co Elgin Butler Plant Elgin TX 1.53 None 0.324a0.495b0.00545c596 23 Endicott Clay ProductsCoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 None 0.324a2.91b0.0321cC-4Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)597 23 Endicott Clay ProductsCoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 9.00 None 0.324a2.91b0.0321c598 23 Endicott Clay ProductsCoEndicott Clay Products Fairbury NE 8.86 None 0.324a2.87b0.0316c605 GENE-5 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plant40Coosa GA 18.75 DIFF 0.0390d0.655 0.00721e606 GENE-5 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale Brick-Plant40Coosa GA 18.75 DIFF 0.0390 0.655 0.00335612/613 GENE-8 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale BrickPlants 35 & 36Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 20.20 DLA 0.413 6.11 0.0672e614 GENE-8 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale BrickPlants 35 & 36Blue Ridge(Roanoke)VA 22.00 DLA 0.165a3.64b0.0400c615 GENE-9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 3.68 None 0.324a1.19b0.0131c616 GENE-9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 3.68 None 0.324a1.19b0.0131c617 GENE-9 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale BrickPlants 6 & 28Atkins(Marion)VA 15.02 DLA 0.165a2.49b0.0273c618 GENE-15 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale- CorbinPlant 33Woodbine KY 9.90 None 0.324a3.21b0.0353c619 GENE-15 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale- CorbinPlant 33Woodbine KY 14.40 None 0.324a4.66b0.0513c622/623 GENE-11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 27.40 None 0.324a8.87b0.0976c624 GENE-11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 20.55 DLA 0.0910d1.81 0.0199e625 GENE-11 General Shale Brick, Inc General Shale- MoncureFacilityMoncure NC 20.55 DLA 0.0910 1.81 0.0199e635 GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerBigler PA 16.20 None 0.324a5.24b0.0577cC-5Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)636 GLEN-1 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationBiglerBigler PA 16.20 None 0.324a5.24b0.0577c637 GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaCaledonia OH 8.89 None 0.324a2.88b0.0317c638 GLEN-2 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCaledoniaCaledonia OH 8.89 None 0.324a2.88b0.0317c639 GLEN-3 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationCapitolManassas VA 17.00 None 0.324a5.50b0.0605c644 GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMarseilles IL 15.54 DLA 0.178 2.66 0.0292e645 GLEN-8 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationMarseillesMarseilles IL 15.96 DLA 0.262 4.14 0.0456e642 GLEN-5 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationRedfieldRedfield IA 10.94 None 0.324a3.54b0.0390c648 GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkYork PA 11.24 None 0.324a3.64b0.0400c649 GLEN-10 Glen Gery Glen-Gery CorporationYorkYork PA 19.76 DLA 0.0566 0.677 0.00744e650 HANS2 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Athens Athens TX 9.53 None 0.250 2.48 0.0272e671 HANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Columbia - Plant2Columbia SC 11.30 None 0.324a3.66b0.0402c672 HANS13 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Columbia - Plant2Columbia SC 11.30 None 0.324a3.66b0.0402c652 HANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Elgin Elgin TX 11.50 None 0.324a3.72b0.0410c653 HANS5 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Elgin Elgin TX 12.20 DIFF 0.0516 0.452 0.00148656 HANS7 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Mineral WellsEastMineralWellsTX 7.99 None 0.324a2.59b0.0285c663 HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Ninety Six Ninety-Six SC 8.90 None 0.0563 0.433 0.00477e664 HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson-Ninety Six Ninety-Six SC 8.90 None 0.0500d0.440 0.00484e665 HANS9 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Ninety Six Ninety-Six SC 8.90 None 0.0500 0.440 0.00484eC-6Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)667 HANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 None 0.324a3.40b0.0374c668 HANS11 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Roseboro Roseboro NC 10.50 None 0.324a3.40b0.0374c669 HANS12 Hanson Brick East, LLC Hanson- Stanton Stanton KY 8.00 None 0.376 2.84 0.0312e677 145 Hebron Brick Company Hebron Brick Plant Hebron ND 9.60 None 0.324a3.11b0.0342c704/705/706/707184 Ironrock Capital(formerly MetropolitanCeramics, Inc.)Ironrock Capital (formerlyMetropolitan Ceramics,Inc.)Canton OH 13.32 None 0.746 8.27 0.0910e684 35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 None 0.324a3.08b0.0338c685 35 Acme Brick Company Jenkins- Coosaada Plant Coosaada AL 9.50 None 0.324a3.08b0.0338c689 175NR Kansas Brick and TileCoKansas Brick and Tile Hoisington KS 6.00 None 0.324a1.94b0.0214c690 104 Kasten Clay ProductsCoKasten Clay Products Jackson MO 3.74 None 0.324a1.21b0.0133c693 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.24 None 0.0116d0.117 0.00129e694 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 9.64 None 0.324a3.12b0.0343c695 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 12.67 None 0.0116 0.117 0.00129e696 135 Lee Brick and Tile Co Lee Brick Sanford Facility Sanford NC 13.50 DLA 0.0176 0.193 0.00213e701 50 Marion Ceramics, Inc Marion Ceramics Pee Dee SC 3.13 None 0.324a1.01b0.0112c702 42 McAvoy Brick Co McAvoy Brick Phoenixville PA 12.00 None 0.324a3.89b0.0427c703 139 L.P. McNear Brick Co,IncMcNear Brickyard San Rafael CA 8.20 None 0.324a2.65b0.0292c709 87 Mutual Materials Co Mutual Materials-Mica Mica WA 9.60 None 0.324a3.11b0.0342c710 88 Mutual Materials Co Mutual MaterialsNewcastleRenton WA 7.52 None 0.324a2.44b0.0268c711 68 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia- MadisonHeightsMadisonHeightsVA 8.44 None 0.324a2.73b0.0301c712 69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia-Salem Salem VA 6.77 None 0.324a2.19b0.0241c713 69 Old Virginia Brick Co Old Virginia-Salem Salem VA 4.65 None 0.324a1.51b0.0166cC-7Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)714 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 2.57 None 0.324a0.832b0.00915c715 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 2.57 None 0.324a0.832b0.00915c716 176NR Pacific Clay Products Pacific Clay ProductsLake ElsinoreLakeElsinoreCA 5.14 None 0.324a1.66b0.0183c727/728 137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.08 None 0.324a6.18b0.0679c729/730 137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 26.60 DLA 0.139 3.47 0.0381e731/732 137 Pine Hall Brick Co, Inc Pine Hall- Madison Plant Madison NC 19.20 None 0.324a6.22b0.0684c735 159 Ragland Clay Products,LLCRagland Clay Products Ragland AL 3.36 None 0.324a1.09b0.0120c742 45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 4.62 None 0.324a1.50b0.0165c743 45 Richards Brick Co Richards Brick Edwardsville IL 4.62 None 0.324a1.50b0.0165c753 46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 11.00 None 0.324a3.56b0.0392c754 46 Statesville Brick Co Statesville Brick Statesville NC 9.35 None 0.324a3.03b0.0333c758 116 Summit Pressed Brickand Tile CoSummit- Brick Plant andStorage YardPueblo CO 6.75 None 0.324a2.19b0.0240c759 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 None 0.324a0.359b0.00395c760 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.24 None 0.324a0.401b0.00442c761 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 None 0.324a0.359b0.00395c762 186 Summitville Tiles, Inc. Summitville Tiles, Inc.-Minerva PlantMinerva OH 1.11 None 0.324a0.359b0.00395c773 124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 7.98 None 0.324a2.58b0.0284c774 124 Watsontown Brick Co Watsontown Brick Watsontown PA 10.00 DIFF 0.0555a0.555b0.00610c775 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 11.90 None 0.641 5.83 0.0641e776 Whit Whitacre Greer Whitacre Greer Alliance OH 6.80 None 0.324a2.20b0.0242cC-8Kiln IDFacilityIDCompany NameFacility NameCityStateKilnDesignCapacityAPCDAveragePM(lb/ton)AveragePM(lb/hr)Averagenon-HgHAPmetals(lb/hr)777 147 Yankee Hill Brick andTileYankee Hill Brick and Tile Lincoln NE 4.90 None 0.324a1.59b0.0174caNo PM or HAP metals test data available;value is emission factor based on APCD.bNo PM or HAP metals test data available; value calculated by multiplying lb/ton value and kiln capacity.cNo PM or HAP metals test data available; value calculated bymultiplying lb/hr PM emissions and average percentage of PM thatis metal HAP (1.1%).dNo PM test data available, assigned same lb/ton value as tested identical kiln at the same facility.eKiln not tested for HAP metals; value calculated by multiplying lb/hr PM emissions and average percentage of PM that is metalHAP (1.1%).