alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

            PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Linda L. Perry, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wings & Things,
Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                   /s/ Linda L. Perry
Date: May 11, 2005                ___________________________________________
                                  Linda L. Perry, Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit
23.3
 
 CONSENT
OF SRK CONSULTING (US), INC
 
 The undersigned hereby states as
follows:
 
 Our firm
assisted with the "NI 43-101 Technical Report, Capital Gold
Corporation, El Chanate Gold Mine, Sonora, Mexico” (the "Technical Report")
for Capital Gold Corporation (the "Company") dated  November 27,
2009, portions of which are summarized in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended July 31, 2010 (the "Form 10-K").  Our
firm also assisted with the “National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report on
Resources – Nayarit Gold Inc. – Orion Project, State of Nayarit, Mexico” dated
December 29, 2009, and “National Instrument 43-101 Preliminary Economic
Assessment – Nayarit Gold Inc. – Orion Project, Animas/Del Norte Zone, State of
Nayarit, Mexico” dated February 5, 2010, portions of which are also summarized
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010
(the "Form 10-K").
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-143957) on Form S-3, and the related prospectuses and any amendments and
supplements thereto, and the Registration Statement (No. 333-141591) on Form S-8
of the Company of the summary information concerning the Technical Report and
all information derived therefrom, including the reference to our firm included
with such information as set forth in the Form 10-Q.
  Date:  October
      14, 2010
                SRK
      CONSULTING (U.S.), INC./s/ Bret
      SwansonName:  Bret
      Swanson, MAusIMMTitle:    Senior
      Mining Engineer
#### Santos KEPLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27668.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is an aggravated assault upon an officer; the punishment, a fine of $75.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be -regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Green Dolphin SystemsCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),I, Nicholas Plessas, Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:
         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Act of 1934; and
         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fully presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
By: /s/ Nicholas Plessas
    --------------------
    Nicholas Plessas
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    and Chief Financial Officer
April 18, 2005
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
KIK Technology International, Inc.
File No. 000-30071


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  October 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William M.  Knooihuizen,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 15, 2006                      By: /s/ William M. Knooihuizen
      -----------------                         --------------------------------
                                                          William M. Knooihuizen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  October 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Kuldip C. Baid, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 15, 2006                      By: /s/ Kuldip C. Baid
      -----------------                         --------------------------------
                                                                  Kuldip C. Baid
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained by KIK
Technology  International,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements of National Home Health Care Corp.  on Forms S-8  (Registration  Nos.
033-61315 and  333-46076)  of our report dated October 3, 2000,  with respect to
the  consolidated  financial  statements of National Home Health Care Corp.  and
subsidiaries  as of July 31,  2000 and for the two years then ended  included in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2000.



/s/ Holtz Rubenstein & Co., LLP
Holtz Rubenstein & Co., LLP
Melville, New York
September 24, 2002
#### ESPERANZA COLON *v.*FIRST NATIONAL SUPERMARKETS, INC.

(14136)

Dupont, C. J., and Lavery and Heiman, Js.

Submitted on briefs December 14, 1995

decision released January 23, 1996

*Gerald T. Giaimo*filed a brief for the appellant (plaintiff).

*GraigA. Fontaine, Paul T. Edwards*and *Christopher J. Coxon*filed a brief for the appellee (defendant).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03563]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: February 22, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 36 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-180 and CP2024-186.

Christopher Doyle,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2024-03563 Filed 2-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Hesperia Holding, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Donald Shimp, President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
/s/Donald Shimp                       

DonaldShimp

President

August23, 2004
Exhibit 31.3


Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934


I, Barry J. Bentley, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.; and


2.    Based on my knowledge, this Amendment does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date:April 30, 2019/s/ Barry J. BentleyBarry J. BentleyInterim President and Chief Executive Officer











1
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1786 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1786

To provide for the application of sections 552, 552a, and 552b of title 
     5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of 
    Information Act and the Privacy Act), and the Federal Advisory 
 Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) to the Smithsonian Institution, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 5, 2011

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the application of sections 552, 552a, and 552b of title 
     5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of 
    Information Act and the Privacy Act), and the Federal Advisory 
 Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) to the Smithsonian Institution, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open and Transparent Smithsonian Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF OPEN GOVERNMENT STATUTES TO THE SMITHSONIAN 
              INSTITUTION.

    (a) In General.--The following provisions shall apply to the 
Smithsonian Institution:
            (1) Section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly 
        referred to as the Freedom of Information Act).
            (2) Sections 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly 
        referred to as the Privacy Act).
            (3) Sections 552b of title 5, United States Code (relating 
        to open meetings).
            (4) The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
    (b) Agency.--For purposes of each provision of law under subsection 
(b)--
            (1) the Smithsonian Institution shall be an agency; and
            (2) the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution shall be 
        the head of the agency.
    (c) Effective Date and Application.--
            (1) Effective date.--This section shall take effect on the 
        date of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Application.--This section shall apply to--
                    (A) all actions taken by the Board of Regents of 
                the Smithsonian Institution or any officer or employee 
                of the Smithsonian Institution before, on, or after the 
                date of enactment of this Act;
                    (B) any record created before, on, or after that 
                date; and
                    (C) any meeting held before, on, or after that 
                date.
                                 <all>
```
#### George Gordon RUSHING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27296.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1955.

On Rehearing April 6, 1955.

*105Power, McDonald & Mell, Tyler, by Warren McDonald, by Milton Greer M'ell, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted and. assessed a fine of $100 under a complaint and information charging that appellant "did then and there unlawfully drive and operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway, there situate, when the Texas Operator’s license of the said George Gordon Rushing was suspended.”

No ■ statement of facts accompanies the record.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the complaint and information to charge an offense in that it does not allege that appellant had an operator’s license, or how, when and by whom any operator’s license he may have had was suspended, and does not inform him of the nature and character of the proof he would be required to meet.

The allegations of said complaint and information are sufficient to apprise the accused of. the nature of the offense with which he is charged, therefore appellant’s motion to quash was properly overruled. Hines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 248 S.W.2d 156.

Appellant’s remaining contentions cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts. Reece v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 425, 209 S.W.2d 177; Gill v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 604, 210 S.W.2d 170; McDaniel v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 126, 239 S.W.2d 630; Elliot v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 502, 243 S.W. 2d 839; Mason v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 244 S.W.2d 216; Barnes v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 261 S.W.2d 597; Bishop v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 269 S.W.2d 372.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing

WOODLEY, Judge. .

A statement of facts timely filed in the trial court has been furnished ’ and will be considered.

Appellant contends that there is no evidence to the effect that a Texas Operator’s License was ever issued to him and no showing that any such Operator’s License had been suspended.

The evidence, viewed from the standpoint most favorable to the State, showed that appellant-was convicted in February 1952 of the offense of driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated, and that he was arrested while driving, a motor vehicle on a public road in June thereafter.

There is no proof that appellant was a licensee prior to his conviction in February for driving while intoxicated. If a license had been issued to him, there is nothing in the record to show that it was a “Texas Operator’s License” which was suspended by reason of such conviction. The proof therefore fails to sustain the allegation of the complaint and information that appellant drove a motor vehicle “when the Texas Operator’s License of the said George Gordon Rushing was suspended.”

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is granted, the affirmance is set aside and the judgment is now reversed and the cause remanded.
#### Kelly et al., Appellants, *v.*Urban et ux.

Argued April 18, 1939.

*21June 27, 1939:

Before Keller, P. J., Cunningham, Baldrige, Stadteeld, Parker, Rhodes and Hirt, JJ.

*Edward P. Doran,*for appellants.

No appearance was made nor brief filed for appellees.

*Louis Rosenberg,*Special Deputy Attorney General, for Commonwealth.

Per Curiam,

This was an amicable action and case stated in assumpsit, brought for the purpose of determining whether in the circumstances recited in the case stated, the plaintiffs, administrators, etc. of Michael J. Kelly, deceased, can convey to the defendants a good and sufficient title to a described lot of ground in the Borough of Mount Pleasant, (1) without an order of the orphans’ court, (2) without the heirs of Michael J. Kelly joining therein, (3) without the liens of certain judgments being satisfied, and (4) without the payment of transfer inheritance tax.

The lower court ruled that the plaintiffs, as adminis*22trators etc. of Michael J. Kelly, deceased, could make a good and sufficient title for the land in question clear of all encumbrances, without an order of the orphans’ court, without the heirs-at-law of Michael J. Kelly, deceased, joining therein and without the real estate being subject to the liens of the judgments set forth in the case stated; but that the real estate was subject to the payment by the plaintiffs of transfer inheritance tax, and entered judgment in accordance therewith, from which plaintiffs appealed.

Unfortunately in making its findings and entering its judgment the learned court did not confine itself to the facts as contained in the case stated, but restated the facts in different form and also found certain facts not set forth in the case stated. This it had no power to do: *Com. v. Howard,*149 Pa. 302, 305, 24 A. 308; *Berks County v. Pile,*18 Pa. 493; *Schuylkill County v. Shoener,*205 Pa. 592, 597, 55 A. 791; and in consequence the judgment must be set aside: *Diehl v. Ihrie,*3 Wharton 143, 149. See also, *Andrus v. Shippen Twp.,*36 Pa. Superior Ct. 22, 24; *Frailey v. Supreme Council A. L. of H.,*132 Pa. 578, 20 A. 684; *Staten Island R. T. Co. v. Hite,*41 Pa. Superior Ct. 527; *Mutchler v. City of Easton,*148 Pa. 441, 23 A. 1109. A case stated is in the nature of a special verdict and cannot be changed as to its facts or helped by inferences: *Loux & Son v. Fox,*171 Pa. 68, 71, 33 A. 190; *Diehl v. Ihrie,*supra.

If on reconsideration of the matter by the court below, any essential fact necessary for the decision of the case is found to be lacking in the case stated, it should be quashed: *Ford v. Buchanan,*111 Pa. 31, 2 A. 339.

We may add that as the Commonwealth is not a party to the case stated, its right to collect a transfer inheritance tax, if any, cannot be affected by the disposition of the case stated.

The judgment of the court below is set aside and the record is remitted for further proceedings on the case stated as filed.