alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Wt-4o 1 

### qs3-os**W\~-4o** qs 3-o(o I I 

### It\ 

## CD1-03,0LII**~u'** 

# os,ot.o

COURT

## ~~~Ef!f'JA!- 'z-t cs R/IVffNAL APPEALS 

### MAY 15 2015

Abel Acosta, Cler;.

. ' ; \ II

. +htJ 

### +he.'( w,U lJOT l>t l>art06 A f..A<-T**f'D)~TJJ6t C\~**  -f'h.d- i5 

### wk'f



## ·I. oliol**~·· ~t**  a

### V>f~·**St~a..** -f/,ese set o( wri.fJ LJ..is 

### olls.-.-iissed



### ba.c:l.**~""-** z_o,-z.·**'~wiTHouT** fVOT:r(.tS"**(Y~** 

# my At'l'\e

..... d.-1 wa.:rr r

... 

## -0,\.tcl (to.. 

## Arr:\ 2012.. WA.5 

### C<.f.kr**~ ''w1o~<,,**  1

### ~. Ca.u4L

### of~- 

## CYUt**J~:sm i~¢L,~**  

## I**bB-leav~** 

## +M1 must 

### tl.o Oi\e

### ~rl'ecf? 

## 'Th-ey -dtcl. 11 c f

ttvtswe.r

### ~ 

### Afi\M**wr,r~ -e7t~.**  

### 1"'he..**+ir~-t** 

## w('.t WAS 

### .f.l.tol.

### ~):rn-IOi.lr**~ to~&Nl,**  Nor 

## dtJ 

# r k.no.,.) 

## <,+ !<lk; 

### !1Cul 

### u.._hl 'I 

# F nohi:.L 

# f',--_

-lk**l!OfhJi'd.-;~j** 

### (Dur.J., 

## --l1vd ;5**wk~** I

### St<~m~fle_c/ a.tt

### Am~i\.d 

## w.--:t.

I abo wrote

## ~o\.(r oJI-:-1.(__ -to f;wJ

## o~**~ ~-** **i-1o~·iu~.** o{

## ~- oli5. m

## ;s~a,/.!t.

.lcJ'A..S tJ\.Q.;**J~t:/**

. o.f.**wr:-~";>) N~ntbertol**  (1/J**Wf.--Yo,q~3..-o3** 

### wt. 40Ci5']-0J./ or d(O**vo~ ~<..** 

le.-c.orJs 

### shou.>"U 

## I WAS nottft.al of .fuse

### J.ls'VniH~ 

# ?

--;:: J/1/lJJ'K 

### 'Vot.( rOll .Yoi./Jt 7):J11£ TN THfS£

## ~AffFi!.2i ,Aitly·

## Ae~**I~**



## · --1/iRs.e ttta-f}ers woulol 6e**r~a:t** 

# /1 ,APfffe:IA/E"()



## :C /lc**mttr~** 

### rc>ur t.f..·u.m6t.i 5£1lvAJ/r 

### 'K fSfiFc,'f FULL'(**~~-........._.-**
EXHIBIT 23.1
 
 CONSENT OF
 INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-1 (Nos. 333-147436, 333-121563 and 333-153062) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-160403, 333-153595, 333-133001, 333-70838, and 333-49396) of Communication Intelligence Corporation and its subsidiary of our report dated March 31, 2010 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern), which appears on page F-1 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 
 
 
 /s/ GHP HORWATH, P.C.
 
 Denver, Colorado
 March 31, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 - 1 -
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

07/29

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Celestial Seasonings, Inc.:

   We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Celestial
Seasonings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of September 30, 1999 and
1998, and for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 1999,
and have issued our report thereon dated November 3, 1999; such consolidated
financial statements and report are included in your 1999 Annual Report to
Stockholders and are included herein. Our audits also included the
consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company, listed in Item 14.
This consolidated financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Denver, Colorado
November 3, 1999

                                       1
#### Porter Foster SILVEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28392.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1956.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50. . .

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. A1Í proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented" for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit
10.20 


 


Memorandum of Understanding


  


Party A: The Administrative Committee of Wuxi Huishan
Economic Development Zone, Jiangsu Province (Hereinafter referred to as “Party A”)


 


Party B: CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Hereinafter referred
to as “Party B”)


 


Whereas the 2 Parties, through negotiations, have mutually
reached this Memorandum of Understanding (Hereinafter referred to as “MoU”) on the establishment of a business entity
by Party B in the abovementioned Economic Development Zone.


 


1.       Party B agrees to
incorporate and invest in a company in the Development Zone with a registered capital of US$100,000,000 (one hundred million US
Dollars), whose business includes manufacturing, sales, and research and development of biopharmaceutical products.


 


2.       The Party A agrees
to provide a land of 107 Chinese acreages for industrial use, on which Party B shall build its own manufacturing base.


 


3.       The Party A shall
support Party B in the procedure of corporate registration and the bidding auction of the land plot.


 


4.       The Joint Venture
shall not be operating for less than 10 years, and the Joint Venture shall comply with related laws and regulations on environmental
protection, fire protection, safe production, among others, during its capital construction and business operations. Party B shall
ensure that the Joint Venture should strictly comply with the local policy on common statistical method in the zone where it runs
its business, and issue invoices in a timely manner, and shall not issue invoices from an address other than its registered address.


 


5.       In satisfactorily
performing all of the foregoing requirements, Party B and/or its Joint Venture shall be entitled to related government supporting
policies in accordance with applicable agreements.


 


6.       Specific terms and
conditions shall be set forth in Investment Agreement to be signed.


 


7.       This MoU shall take
effect upon being executed by both Parties.


 


8.       The MoU has 6 originals,
with the Party A and Party B each holding 2 copies, and the other two copies shall be achieved.


 


Signature and Stamp of both Parties:


 


	
        Party A:

         

        The Administrative Committee of Wuxi Huishan

        Economic Development
        Zone, Jiangsu Province

        (Stamped)

         

        Legal representative (Authorized representative)

         
/s/ Wenbin Cao	 	
        Party B:

         

        CASI Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

        (Stamped)

         

         

        Legal representative (Authorized representative)

         

        /s/ Wei-Wu He



  


Date signed: 11/16/2018
#### Weldon Burl HUBBARD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28131.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon- B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*665• PER CURIAM.

Unlawfully selling whisky in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $300.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03694]



[[Page 13800]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12338]


Notification of Meetings of the United States-Bahrain 
Subcommittee on Environmental Affairs and Joint Forum on Environmental 
Cooperation; Withdrawal

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State published a document in the Federal 
Register of February 14, 2024, concerning meetings of the United 
States-Bahrain Subcommittee on Environmental Affairs and Joint Forum on 
Environmental Cooperation. The meetings have been postponed and are 
pending new dates to reschedule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Merideth Manella, (202) 286-5271, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#460b2728232a2a270b06353227322368212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc81ada2a9a0a0ad818cbfb8adb8a9e2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a> or Tia Potskhverashvili, (202) 395-5414, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#384c515948574c4b784d4b4c4a165d5748165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="74001d15041b000734010700065a111b045a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Withdrawal.
    In the Federal Register of February 14, 2024, we withdraw FR Doc 
2024-03027 [Public Notice: 12330].

Scott B. Ticknor,
Director, Office of Environmental Quality, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-03694 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TS- AMID10/20/40

Attachment # 10

Pt. 2, Sec. B

Additional Information on the Absence of Water Releases during Manufacture,

Processing, and End UseTS- AMID10/20/40
**EXHIBIT
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
                PURSUANT TO****18
                U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS
                ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION
                906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of eRoomSystem Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David
      A. Gestetner, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), President
      and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of
      the
      Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











By:
                /s/ David A. Gestetner
            
            President,
                Chief Executive Officer and
              Chief
                Financial Officer
            
            May
                15, 2006David
                A. Gestetner
            
            (Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal
              Financial
                and Accounting Officer )
#### Robert Lee HERROD v. The STATE of Texas.

No. 28366.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 16, 1956.

Edgar L. Smith, Dallas, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful possession of a narcotic drug; the punishment, 10 years. •

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form executed by the appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (57,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Curtis WALLS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28831.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 20, 1957.

Jack Welch, Marlin, for appellant.

Thos. Bartlett, Jr., County Attorney, Marlin, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary with intent to commit the crime of rape; the punishment, 10 years.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction is challenged.

The prosecutrix, an 80-year old woman, operated a small store in which she sold candy and soda water. According to her testimony, the 24-year old appellant had on a prior occasion offered her $10 for the privilege of having intercourse with her, which she declined and ordered him to leave the store. On the night charged in the indictment, the appellant entered the front door of the store with his pants open and 'his privates exposed, walked to a point approximately six feet from where the prose-cutrix was seated watching television, apparently saw prosecutrix’ companion Pauline Anderson, said “Oh” and left the store. Sometime later, the appellant was seen looking in the window of the store, and when this was called to the prosecutrix’ attention she chased him away with a baseball bat.

The appellant, testifying in his own behalf, stated that he had gone to the store to buy some candy, that after he entered he discovered that his pants were open, said “Oh” and immediately left. He denied the $10 offer or that he had looked in the window. He testified that he had never attended school.

The State’s brief seeks to support the contention that a burglary was committed. We need not pass upon that question because we have concluded that the evidence is insufficient to establish the requisite intent on the part of the appellant to commit the crime of rape.

In the relatively recent case of Lawson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 218 S.W.2d 845, 846, in reversing the conviction because of the insufficiency of the evidence, we said:

> “There must be sufficient evidence to authorize the jury to believé that it was his intention to have the carnal knowledge at the time at all hazards ; that he intended to use sufficient force to accomplish his purpose notwithstanding any resistance the female might make.”

Finding the evidence insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded. •
Evaluation Language for Generic Application Packages

A strong evaluation plan should be included in the application narrative and should 

be used, as appropriate, to shape the development of the project from the beginning 

of the grant period. The plan should include benchmarks to monitor progress 

toward specific project objectives and also outcome measures to assess the impact 

on teaching and learning or other important outcomes for project participants. 

More specifically, the plan should identify the individual and/or organization that 

have agreed to serve as evaluator for the project and describe the qualifications of 

that evaluator. The plan should describe the evaluation design, indicating: (1) what 

types of data will be collected; (2) when various types of data will be collected; (3) 

what methods will be used; (4) what instruments will be developed and when; (5) 

how the data will be analyzed; (6) when reports of results and outcomes will be 

available; and (7) how the applicant will use the information collected through the 

evaluation to monitor progress of the funded project and to provide accountability 

information both about success at the initial site and effective strategies for 

replication in other settings. Applicants are encouraged to devote an appropriate 

level of resources to project evaluation.

Successful applicants will be expected to report annually on the progress of each project 

or study included in the grant, including a description of preliminary or key findings and 

an explanation of any changes in goals, objectives, methodology, or planned products or 

publications.
Exhibit 32.1   WINGS & THINGS, INC.  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 18 U.S.C. Section 1350  The undersigned executive officer of Wings & Things, Inc. certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:  a. the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wings & Things, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  b. the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wings & Things, Inc.   Date: April 29, 2011/s/ Greg L. Popp
Greg L. Popp
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
#### IRVING CARPET COMPANY, Appellant, v. Charles Vinson BRAGG, Appellee.

No. 3270.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Nov. 23, 1956.

Dennis G. Brewer, Irving, for appellant.

Passman & Jones, Dallas, for appellee.

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Irving Carpet Company appealed from a judgment. On May 28, 1956, it filed a transcript in the Court of Civil Appeals. The case was set for submission October 16, 1956. Irving Carpet Company did not appear and the case was submitted on the record. Appellant has not yet filed briefs or offered an excuse for such failure. R.C.P. 414 provides that an appellant shall file briefs within thirty days after filing the transcript. R.C.P. 415 provides that when an appellant fails to file briefs within said time the court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless it is shown good cause for such failure and that appel-lee has not suffered material injury thereby. Although notified of all the proceedings, appellant has done nothing since filing the transcript on May 28th. Since appellant has not filed briefs within the time prescribed and has made no effort to show that good cause existed for such failure or that appellee has not been injured thereby, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost. Bloss v. Alston, Tex.Civ.App., 284 S.W.2d 416.
Exhibit 24

CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

I
am the duly qualified and acting Secretary of 4-D Neuroimaging, a California corporation (the "Corporation").

The
following is a true copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors at a meeting held on December 5, 2001, which appears in the minute book of the Corporation:



Such
resolution has not subsequently been amended, modified or revoked and as of the date of this Certificate is in full force and effect.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certificate of Secretary as of December 21, 2001.

| |  | /s/EUGENE C. HIRSCHKOFFEugene C. Hirschkoff, Secretary
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 23(a)





                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts" in the Registration Statement (Form S-8), pertaining to
the Phillips Petroleum Company Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors and to the incorporation by reference therein and in
the related prospectus of our report dated February 23, 1998,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Phillips Petroleum Company included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997, as
amended, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.


                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                   -----------------
                                   ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
November 9, 1998


<PAGE>
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certification of Chief ExecutiveOfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersignedofficer of Eschelon Telecom, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)           the accompanying Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

(ii)          the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Sign:                                 | /S/    Richard A. Smith |   |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard A. Smith                      |                                        |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |                                        |   |
| August 11, 2006                       |                                        |   |
|                                       |                                             |        |  |  |

 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of this Report or asa separate disclosure document.  A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the quarterly report of I-trax, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David R. Bock, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ David R. Bock
-------------------------
David R. Bock
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2004



                                       39
<PAGE>