alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                ACTIVE LINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                                                     FORM 10-KSB
                                                                EXHIBIT 10 (m.2)

                                AMENDMENT NO. ONE
                                       TO
                            STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT

                                  JULY 2, 2002

         THIS AMENDMENT NO. ONE is being made to that certain Stock Purchase
Agreement, dated June 5, 2002 (the "Agreement'), by and between Active Link
Communications, Inc. ("Seller") and Unisource Cap LLC ("Purchaser") and is being
executed by the Seller and Purchaser as of this 2nd day of July, 2002.

         Seller and Purchaser hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

         1. The terms, covenants and conditions set forth herein are intended to
and shall have the same force and effect as if set forth at length in the body
of the Agreement. To the extent that the provisions of the Amendment No. One are
inconsistent with any provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this
Amendment No. One shall supersede and control.

         2. The Seller and Purchaser agree to extend the Closing Date of the
transactions contemplated in the Agreement from a date falling "...within the 10
to 20 'due diligence' period as set forth in Paragraph 3 of the Agreement to a
date occurring on or before July 31, 2002.

         3. Purchaser shall deposit in Escrow Account No. 22-9659 a
fully-executed copy of this Amendment One.

         4. Seller and Purchaser shall execute and deliver whatever additional
instruments and documents may be necessary in order to perform the undertakings
herein assumed by the parties.

         5. Except as otherwise modified by the foregoing, all other terms and
conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Purchaser have caused this Amendment No.
One to be executed and delivered on the following dates.

UNISOURCE CAP LLC                           ACTIVE LINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

By:                                         By:
   ------------------------                    -------------------------
         Zahra Ghods                              Timothy Ells
         CEO                                      CEO
Pursuant to Power of Attorney by JD Surber        July 2002
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 253 ) ll-K - (I ) -6 6 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57AM

Sheet 253 of 325P. 2 

# P. 

# i

# Pl

n -K-CI)-6 6
198 5 BAS E CAS E RESULT S - SIXT H ROUNDO F IFCA M RUNS . EEA , Inc . Septembe r 4 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATIO

N CA N B E FOUNDI

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-6 6
Exhibit 31.1
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-
14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Subrah S. Iyar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WebEx
Communications, Inc;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

 (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 13, 2003


/s/   SUBRAH S. IYAR
-------------------------
Subrah S. Iyar
Chief Executive Officer
prepared for:

CENRAP/CENSARA

prepared by:

Gregory Stella

Jim Wilkinson

T.W. Tesche

Alpine Geophysics, LLC

Appendix G:

CENRAP Class I Area

Cost Effectiveness Curves
Breton Island

SO4/EC/OC/CM AOI-1

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

$4,500

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000

Millions

Annual Emission Reduction (Tons)

C

o

ntrol C

o

st (2

0

0

5

$)

Top Residual Categories Only

All Categories
Boundary Waters-Voyageurs

SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS AOI-1

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

$9,000

$10,000

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000

Millio

n

s

Annual Emission Reduction (Tons)

C

o

ntrol C

o

st (2

0

0

5

$)

Top Residual Categories Only

All Categories
Salt Creek-Guadalupe Mountain-Big Bend

SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS AOI-1

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000

Millions

Annual Emission Reduction (Tons)

C

o

ntrol C

o

st (2

0

0

5

$)

Top Residual Categories Only

All Categories
Wichita Mountain 

SO4/EC/OC AOI-1

$0

$5,000

$10,000

$15,000

$20,000

$25,000

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000

Millions

Annual Emission Reduction (Tons)

C

o

ntrol C

o

st (2

0

0

5

$)

Top Residual Categories Only

All Categories
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Colin Goddard, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

<Table>
<S>                                            <C>
                                                         /s/ COLIN GODDARD, PH.D.
                                               ---------------------------------------------
                                                           Colin Goddard, Ph.D.
                                                          Chief Executive Officer

Date: December 13, 2004
</Table>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 27


                        FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE ARTICLE 5

  <ARTICLE>              5
+<CIK>                   0000728389
+<NAME>                  NATIONAL HOME HEALTH CARE CORP.
+<MULTIPLIER>            1
+<CURRENCY>              0

<S>                                                <C>                         <C>
  <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                            7/31/99
+<PERIOD-START>                                                                8/1/98
  <PERIOD-END>                                                                 7/31/99
<PERIOD-TYPE> 12 Months +
  <CASH>                                           7,442,000
  <SECURITIES>                                       178,000
  <RECEIVABLES>                                   10,851,000
  <ALLOWANCES>                                       392,000
  <INVENTORY>                                              0
  <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,787,000
  <PP&E>                                           1,316,000
  <DEPRECIATION>                                     773,000
  <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,092,000
  <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,079,000
  <BONDS>                                                  0
  <COMMON>                                             6,000
  <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
  <PREFERRED>                                              0
  <OTHER-SE>                                      25,007,000
  <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,092,000
  <SALES>                                         38,518,000
  <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,518,000
  <CGS>                                                    0
  <TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,090,000
  <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
  <LOSS-PROVISION>                                   674,000
  <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (385,000)
  <INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,139,000
  <INCOME-TAX>                                     1,001,000
  <INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,138,000
  <DISCONTINUED>                                           0
  <EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
  <CHANGES>                                                0
  <NET-INCOME>                                     1,138,000
  <EPS-BASIC>                                          .22
  <EPS-DILUTED>                                          .22


* Optional.

+ Required when applicable.

</TABLE>
#### John William GOBER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27485.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 16, 1955.

No attorney on appeal.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for murder without malice; the punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The jury rejected appellant’s claim of self-defense and declined to recommend a suspension of sentence.

The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged and need not be discussed. Suffice it to say that the evidence shows that the deceased met his death at the hands of the appellant, death having resulted from a stab wound in the heart, and other stabs and cuts were inflicted upon him by appellant with a knife having a three and one-half inch blade.

Only one bill of exception is found in the record. It complains of the - overruling of appellant’s amended motion for new trial based upon the contention that after the verdict, appellant and his counsel for the first time learned that the state’s witness Era Belle Cavanaugh, who testified on the trial that she witnessed the difficulty, had made a statement to the officers and nowhere therein said that she saw the defendant. The bill further shows that appellant contended in his motion that in fact the witness Era Belle Cavanaugh did not see the defendant strike at the deceased and her testimony to that effect was perjured and untrue.

The testimony heard on the motion did not sustain the allegation that the testimony of the witness was false. At most, it showed only that the written statement made to the officers was not complete.

The trial court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction and no reversible error appears.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher M. Condron, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/  Christopher M. Condron
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Christopher M. Condron
                                  Chairman of the Board,
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 13, 2009
4-30-13 Line 1 Run 1

Temperature Data

File Name: C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\MDAS-PRO\Data\c1.MP_Lgr

Recorder Start Time: 3/27/2013 7:21:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time

Recorder Stop Time: 5/2/2013 9:21:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time

Measurement Interval: 30Min

Number of Measurements: 1733

Alarm Activated: False

Printout Date: 5/2/2013 9:38:07 AM Eastern Daylight Time

Logger Serial Number: 110405008

Initial Description: Alcoa Line 1

Final Comment: 

Tracking Number: 5067

Note: 

Data Format: Output All Measurements.

DateTime Temperature

4/30/2013 10:51 97

4/30/2013 11:21 98.2

4/30/2013 11:51 103.4

4/30/2013 12:21 102.8

4/30/2013 12:51 100.6

4/30/2013 13:21 101.8

4/30/2013 13:51 102

4/30/2013 14:21 104.4

4/30/2013 14:51 104.2

4/30/2013 15:21 102

AVG 101.64
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**@ROAD,INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of @Road, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Krish Panu, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

November 8, 2005

 
| /s/ Krish Panu |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Krish Panu               |
| Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
NUMBERS 13-17-00556-CR AND 13-17-00570-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

MANSU LAU KNOX JR., APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 27th District Court

of Bell County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Mansu Lau Knox Jr., has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his 

convictions in trial court cause numbers 76444 and 77322.

1

 The trial court's certifications 

 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a 

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West, Westlaw through 2017 R.S.). 
2

of the defendant's right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

On October 19, 2017, we ordered appellant's counsel, Billy Ray Hall Jr., to, within 

thirty days, review the record and advise this Court as to whether appellant has a right to 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4. No response to this Court's order has been 

received. Therefore, we abate these appeals and remand these causes to the trial court 

for a hearing to determine why counsel has failed to comply with this Court's order. The 

trial court's findings and conclusions shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record. 

The trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and reporter's record, if any, with 

the Clerk of this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.

If the trial court determines that counsel is unable to represent appellant in these 

appeals, the trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to 

prosecute the appeals, whether appellant is indigent, and whether appellant is entitled to 

appointed counsel. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84 (1988); Stafford v. State, 

813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We further direct the trial court to issue 

findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding these issues. Should the trial court find 

that appellant desires to pursue these appeals, is indigent, and is entitled to appointed 

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel. If counsel is appointed, the name, address, 

email address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel shall be included 

in the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
3

Delivered and filed the 

1st day of December, 2017.
ex_138385.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


THIRD AMENDMENT


OF THE 


H.B. FULLER COMPANY 


DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RESTORATION PLAN


(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2008)


 


H.B. Fuller Company (the “Company”) has adopted the H.B. Fuller Company Defined Contribution Restoration Plan (the “Plan”), and maintains the Plan, as amended and restated. The Company, acting through the Compensation Committee of its Board of Directors, pursuant to Sections 9.1 and 11.1.3 of the Plan, has approved and adopted the following Plan amendments, and has directed the Vice President of Human Resources to execute such amendments:


 


	1.	Section 1.2.3. is amended in its entirety to read as follows, effective January 1, 2019:



 


1.2.3       Base Plan – the H.B. Fuller Company 401(k) and Retirement Plan or any successor plan thereto.      


 


	2.	Section 3.2 is amended in its entirety to read as follows, effective January 1, 2019:



 


3.2          Restoration Nonelective Credits.


 


3.2.1.     Non-discretionary Nonelective Amount. As soon as administratively feasible after the end of each Plan Year beginning on or after January 1, 2019, the Company shall credit the Account of each eligible Participant with an amount equal to one percent (1%) of the Participant’s Restoration Nonelective Compensation for such Plan Year.


 


3.2.2.      Discretionary Nonelective Amount. As soon as administratively feasible after the end of each Plan Year beginning on or after January 1, 2019, the Company shall credit the Account of each eligible Participant with an amount equal to the percentage of discretionary “Nonelective Contribution” made by the Company under the Base Plan (if any) for such Plan Year multiplied by the Participant’s Restoration Nonelective Compensation for such Plan Year.


 


3.2.3.     Eligible Participants. For purposes of this Section 3.2, a Participant shall be an eligible Participant for a Plan Year only if the Participant was eligible to receive a “Nonelective Contribution” under the Base Plan for such Plan Year.


 


 


	 	 	H.B. FULLER COMPANY
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Dated: December 17, 2018	 	/s/ Paula Cooney
	 	 	Paula Cooney, Vice President of Human Resources



 


 


 


US.120004226.02
AFS-11-301-E 

May 16, 2011 

 Exemption No. 9914A 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0545 

Mr. Robert A. Anstatt 

Director of Operations 

Easton Aviation, LLC 

29137 Newnam Road, Suite 5 

Easton, MD 21601 

Dear Mr. Anstatt: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9914. 

It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By submission dated May 9, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Easton Aviation, LLC (Easton Aviation) for an extension of Exemption No. 

9914. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Easton 

Aviation, which is operating under separate parts of the regulation, to cover its safetysensitive employees under one testing program. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Easton Aviation. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9914 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 
 2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations listed below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Easton Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all 

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of 

the Easton Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9914 to August 31, 2013 unless 

sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
#### *B.*D. DANIELS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27649.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, 15 years.

Accompanying the record is an affidavit in proper form executed by the appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal.

The request is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.