alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Clifford STRUETKER, Appellant, v. William J. NEISER, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 4, 1956.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1956.

Joseph C. Healy, Clyde E. Vincent, Cov-ington, for • appellant.

James C. Ware, Ware & Ware, Coving-ton, for appellee.

, CAMMACK, Judge.

This action was instituted by the appellant, Clifford Struetker, to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage suffered by him when the automobile he was driving collided with a car being *782driven by the appellee, William J. Neiser, defendant below. A jury trial resulted in a verdict for Neiser, and 'Struetker is appealing from the judgment entered thereon. He urges a reversal on the grounds that (1) the court gave erroneous instructions, and failed to give others which were justified by the evidence; and (2) the court permitted the introduction of irrelevant evidence which was prejudicial to Struetker.

An examination of the record reveals that the first alleged error was not saved as a ground for appeal. Under CR 51, no party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction, unless he objects thereto before the court instructs the jury, stating specifically the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objections. The appellant did not object to the instructions given; furthermore, he offered no alternative instructions. Hence, the mandate of CR 51 precludes his raising on this appeal any alleged error concerning the instructions. See Sams v. Sigmon Ikerd Company, Ky., 280 S.W.2d 515; and Brumley v. Richardson, Ky., 273 S.W.2d 54.

The second ground relied upon by the appellant concerns the introduction of evidence pertaining to insurance. We have held consistently that a reference to automobile liability insurance made in order to bias the minds of the jury at the trial is improper, and, except in the absence of a clear showing of non-prejudice, will constitute a reversible error. Maddox v. Grauman, Ky., 265 S.W.2d 939, 41 A.L.R.2d 964. See also Ideal Pure Milk Company v. Whitaker, Ky., 243 S.W.2d 479. However, we do not think the reference to insurance in this case was prejudicial. Nei-ser (the defendant) merely testified that three days after the accident he went to see Struetker (the plaintiff) because “the insurance agent sent me down to see how he was.” Neiser added that his sister, the owner of the car he was driving at the time of the accident, had received $75 in a settlement for damages to her car. No further reference to insurance was made. We find no deliberate attempt to prejudice the j'ury by the injection of the question of liability insurance. Indeed, the lone reference to insurance does not reveal which party was insured.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Marie L. PENA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27883.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 7, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful sale of beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine ,of $300.', "

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
### OF THE ATIORNEY GENERAL 

### OF TRXAS **AUSllN**,,.. : *. ~i:s

. 

### 479

until he ehall **have eubecrlbe4**  **to the**  **conotltu** tloual oath 0r ai00 and ruchappointmentand oath &re been filed wlth the county clerk for reoord. The amounts allowed to be paid to deputie8, a8rirtantr and employee8 oh611be paid after renaitioa 0r 8ervice **out** or sala orri00w Salary **Pun6** P8 PrOVided rOX in thi6 **Act.**

"
. . ." Ssotion 19, Article 39120,

### Vanon* Aanotato6 Cirll StatUtO8, 18 applicable to countirr harillg a population in lXCa88 Or 19o,ooo inhabItaRt8,aCCOrding t0 the &8t pmCOding Fedora1 Canw8. Barar County ha8 a popu1atIon In exe081 Oi 

### 190,000inhabitant8aCCordin& to the **h8t prOO&ng**  **PedU** al census. Therefore, ParagraphH, 3ectloa 19, Article sl30, **8Upra, i8**  applicable t0 Bexar **COUUty.** Al60 **CCUllt~ OfriOial8**  or **Bexar** county are **compmsatd on**  **a raluy**  **ba8fr.**

**H,** Seotlon

We bare bosn unable to find any 0tl.I.where Paragraph 19,Article 3913e, **supra, hark**  been oonstruedby the appellate court*. However, in *low 0r the Z'oragoIngatatute, you era reepoctrullyaavfaea test .ft

### 18the opinion 0r thf8 ~pfWtm8nt that the CcUnty jud30 Or Bemr County, in cornplia~o with said Paragraph H, Section 19,Article bl)lBe, 8Upra,I!&!$'

appOi!it

65 EIMY a88iltent8OF mp1O]ree8WbOn the **8enioao** or such are required in the p6rronunae 0r hi8 **dUth8** 88 the Ccmmi8sioaerr*Court, in itc discretion,may detumine PfOpU, provided the salaries Or euch a88ietant8 Or employorr ahall not exoeed thepraxlmum allowed **in the**  abova **etatuts. hU8tinfJ**  **that** the r0rrgdng tulip an8wera POIlE quizy,we am Yours very truly Al-TORNEY

OZaERAL OP TEXAS 

### IUAW:ob
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated March 8, 2002, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the Company) included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Company's Registration Statements on Forms S-8
(File Nos. 33-15322, 33-64582, 33-86072, 333-52876, 333-55941 and
333-55933).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
San Jose, California
March 8, 2002
Exhibit 4




Exhibit 4.2

AMENDMENT AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference the 12th  day of November, 2002. BETWEEN

CUSIL VENTURE CORPORATION, a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, having an office at 1400-400 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C., V6C 3G2;

(the "Company")

OF THE FIRST PART

AND

GEORGIA  PACIFIC   SECURITIES   CORPORATION,   a

corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, having its head office at 1600 - 555 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V7X 1S6

(the "Agent")

OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:

A.        The Company and the Agent entered into a Sponsorship and Agency Agreement dated July 31, 2002 (the "Agreement"); and

B.         The Company and the Agent wish to amend the terms of the Agreement in the manner set forth below.

The parties to this Agency Amending Agreement therefore agree:

1.

That the reference to "1,000,000 Shares" in paragraph 8.1 be deleted and replaced with

"2,500,000 Shares".

2.

That the reference to " 120 days" in paragraph 16.9 be deleted and replaced with "150 days".

3.         Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement is hereby ratified, confirmed and approved.

gcs\gcs02914\2\November 8, 2002





-2-

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agency Amending Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

CUSIL VENTURE CORPORATION










    /s / Stuart Rogers  

Authorized signatory

The corporate seal of GEORGIA PACIFIC SECURITIES CORPORATION

was hereunto affixed in the presence of:







/s/Steve Khan 

Authorized Signatory

c/s
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Michael S.Willner certify that:

1)              I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Midwest, L.P. (the “Registrant”);

2)              Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3)              Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a)           designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)          evaluated theeffectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)           disclosed in thisreport any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5)              The Registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)          anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

|   | /s/ Michael S. Willner                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Michael S.  Willner                        |
|   | Vice Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Insight Midwest,  L.P.                     |
|   | August 14,  2006                      |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1665 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1665

  For the relief of Ewa Mozdzen, Jaroslaw Mozdzen, and Sylwia Mozdzen.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2011

Mr. Davis of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  For the relief of Ewa Mozdzen, Jaroslaw Mozdzen, and Sylwia Mozdzen.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR EWA MOZDZEN, JAROSLAW MOZDZEN, 
              AND SYLWIA MOZDZEN.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Ewa Mozdzen, Jaroslaw 
Mozdzen, and Sylwia Mozdzen shall each be eligible for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully 
admitted for permanent residence upon filing an application for 
issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Ewa Mozdzen, Jaroslaw Mozdzen, or 
Sylwia Mozdzen enters the United States before the filing deadline 
specified in subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have 
entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be 
eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Ewa Mozdzen, Jaroslaw Mozdzen, 
and Sylwia Mozdzen, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by 3, during the current or next following fiscal 
year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available to 
natives of the country of the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the aliens' birth under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Ewa Mozdzen, 
Jaroslaw Mozdzen, and Sylwia Mozdzen shall not, by virtue of such 
relationship, be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation November 2000 

# W ASTEWATER 

# M ONITORING Alaska Cruise Ship Initiative Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation 410 Willoughby Avenue, Suite 105. Juneau, Alaska 99801 www.state.ak.us/dec/press/cruise/cruise.htm 

### What is Wastewater Monitoring?

 21 large cruise ships visiting Alaska’s waters were boarded twice during the 2000 season, and each of their overboard discharges were sampled for the common parameters used to assess the level of sewage treatment. 

### What are the standards?

 The only cruise ship wastewater discharge currently regulated is treated blackwater, or toilet waste, from the marine sanitation devices (MSDs).
 The fecal coliform standard for treated blackwater under EPA regulations is 200 fecal coliform per 100 milliliters. Fecal coliform indicates the possible presence of human or warm-blooded animal waste; however, it is not a pathogen.
 Alaska’s water quality standard for fecal coliform is stricter (14 FC/100 ml) in marine waters to protect people eating raw shellfish.
 Graywater (from sinks, showers, etc.) is not regulated by the EPA or the Coast Guard.
 In Alaska graywater is regulated as sewage. 

### What have we found?

 43% of the samples for fecal coliform were in compliance with the MSD standard.
 32% of the samples for total suspended solids were in compliance with the MSD standard.
 Only one of the samples of conventional MSDs was in compliance with both the fecal coliform and total suspended solids standards.
 Five of the six samples of combined gray and blackwater treated by reverse osmosis systems were in compliance with both the fecal coliform and total suspended solids standards.
 75% of the samples of graywater tested so far have over five times the fecal coliform standard for MSDs of 200 FC/100ml.
 Nine of the samples exceeded 10,000,000 FC/100 ml. In other words, MSDs are not working well at producing an effluent that meets the standards set by EPA, and graywater is not benign like many thought, but more like sewage. More information is needed to determine if the impacts from the cumulative cruise ship discharges are a potential threat to public health or the environment.Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation November 2000 

### W HAT DO WE DO NEXT 

### ?

 The Alaska Cruise Ship Initiative water quality work group agreed, at their October meeting, to gather additional information next summer.
 A scientific subgroup will be formed to advise the water quality work group on how to determine if discharges are a potential threat to human health and the environment. The cruise lines will continue to evaluate new technologies for treating both black and graywater.
 The report of this year’s activity will be completed by the end of the year and will provide detailed analysis results. A marine sanitation device on board a cruise ship.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 76 (Friday, April 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 23625]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09303]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8279]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Yemen

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L.112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to Yemen and I hereby waive 
this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 22, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

    Editorial Note: This document was received at the Office of the 
Federal Register April 16, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-09303 Filed 4-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 3rd day of August, 2004.






                                        /s/  Merrill W. Sherman
                                       -------------------------------
                                             Merrill W. Sherman
                                                  President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp Rhode
Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


<PAGE>
# Úřední věstník L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0626 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | L 66 |
| | |
| České vydání | Právní předpisy | Ročník 618. března 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0626

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

L 66

České vydání

Právní předpisy

Ročník 618. března 2018

---

| Obsah | | Opravy | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Oprava nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2018/302 ze dne 28. února 2018 o řešení neoprávněného zeměpisného blokování a dalších forem diskriminace založených na státní příslušnosti, místě bydliště či místě usazení zákazníků v rámci vnitřního trhu a o změně nařízení (ES) č. 2006/2004 a (EU) 2017/2394 a směrnice 2009/22/ES ( Úř. věst. L 60 I, 2.3.2018 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Opravy

Strana

*

Oprava nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2018/302 ze dne 28. února 2018 o řešení neoprávněného zeměpisného blokování a dalších forem diskriminace založených na státní příslušnosti, místě bydliště či místě usazení zákazníků v rámci vnitřního trhu a o změně nařízení (ES) č. 2006/2004 a (EU) 2017/2394 a směrnice 2009/22/ES ( Úř. věst. L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

( Úř. věst. L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

1

| CS | Akty, jejichž název není vytištěn tučně, se vztahují ke každodennímu řízení záležitostí v zemědělství a obecně platí po omezenou dobu.
  Názvy všech ostatních aktů jsou vytištěny tučně a předchází jim hvězdička. |
| --- | --- |

CS

Akty, jejichž název není vytištěn tučně, se vztahují ke každodennímu řízení záležitostí v zemědělství a obecně platí po omezenou dobu.

Názvy všech ostatních aktů jsou vytištěny tučně a předchází jim hvězdička.

---

Opravy

| 8.3.2018 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

L 66/1

---

Oprava nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2018/302 ze dne 28. února 2018 o řešení neoprávněného zeměpisného blokování a dalších forem diskriminace založených na státní příslušnosti, místě bydliště či místě usazení zákazníků v rámci vnitřního trhu a o změně nařízení (ES) č. 2006/2004 a (EU) 2017/2394 a směrnice 2009/22/ES

(
  Úřední věstník Evropské unie L 60 I ze dne 2. března 2018
  )

Strana 14, závěrečná formulace:

místo:

„
  Za Evropský parlament

předsedkyně

L. PAVLOVA

Za Radu

předseda

A. TAJANI
  “,

má být:

„
  Za Evropský parlament

předseda

A. TAJANI

Za Radu

předsedkyně

L. PAVLOVA
  “.

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofYFC 355 Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

May 5, 2006
#### ERIC PLOURDE *v.*COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES

(14524)

O’Connell, Lavery and Landau, Js.

Submitted on briefs February 13

decision released March 5, 1996

*Robert J. McKay*and *Gregory A. Thompson*filed a brief for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Richard Blumenthal,*attorney general, *and Robert T. Morrin,*assistant attorney general, filed a brief for the appellee (defendant).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE MATTER OF: BRENDAN M. 

SULLIVAN, ESQ. MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION PURSUANT TO RULE 311

:

:

:

No. 98 WM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2020, the “Petition for Extension of 

Admission under Rule 311” is GRANTED, IN PART. The petition is deficient, in that it 

fails to offer any argument consistent with the standard governing Rule 311 extensions. 

See Pa.B.A.R. 311(g) (specifying that the 30-month term of a temporary Rule 311 

admission may be extended only upon a showing of good cause). Notwithstanding the 

deficiencies of the filing, Petitioner is GRANTED a limited extension of his Rule 311 

licensure to ensure the continuity of services provided by the Franklin County Legal 

Services, Petitioner’s employer. In order to afford Petitioner time to seek full admission 

to the Pennsylvania bar, his temporary admission is extended until October 31, 2021.