alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
THE STATEMENT OF ROYALTY PROCEEDS AND DISTRIBUTABLE CASH FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,705,582
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,705,582
<PP&E>                                     189,875,741
<DEPRECIATION>                             189,875,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,705,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,705,582
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,705,582
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,890
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  356,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               277,990
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
April 23, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JEROME FISHER PLEASA NT , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00165

- CR NO. 14

- 13

- 0016 6

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We f urther order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 1, 2020

a0624 

# Order

Clerk July 1, 2020

160449

IRENE JAROS,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160449

COA: 340566

Wayne CC: 16

- 015287

- NO

VHS HARPER

- HUTZEL HOSPITAL, INC.,

d/b/a HARPER HOSPITAL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leav e to appeal the September 19, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
KIK Technology International, Inc.
File No. 000-30071


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
William M.  Knooihuizen,  Chief Executive and Acting Chief Financial  Officer of
the Company,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934;  and (2) the  information  contained in the Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.


Date: September 17, 2007                    By: /s/ William M. Knooihuizen
      ------------------                       ---------------------------------
                                                          William M. Knooihuizen
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Acting Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained by KIK
Technology  International,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
NO. 07-10-0224-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	AUGUST 5, 2010

	______________________________

	In re: KENNETH HICKMAN-BEY,

				Relator

	_______________________________

***On Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus***

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Pending before the court is the application of Kenneth Hickman-Bey, for a writ of mandamus.  He asks us to order the Honorable Ron Enns, 69th District Court, to schedule a hearing and act upon various motions pending in a suit he initiated.  The motions include “Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment,” and “Plaintiff’s Motion for Change of Venue.”  We dismiss the petition as moot.

	On June 22, 2010, we directed Judge Enns to respond to relator’s petition for mandamus.  On July 14, 2010, Judge Enns filed his response wherein he granted relator’s motion for teleconferencing regarding his “unresolved pleadings.”  A copy of the document evincing the action is attached to this opinion as Exhibit A.       

	Accordingly, we do not reach the merits of the issues raised, and the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.  *See In re Duncan,*62 S.W.3d 333, 334 (Tex. App.*–*Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig. proceeding).   This dismissal is without prejudice to the relator’s right to seek a writ of mandamus should unreasonable delay arise in the scheduling of the teleconference and ruling upon the aforesaid motions and pleadings. 

							Per Curiam

4

# image1.png

# image2.png
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                       (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350(A) AND (B))


I,  Timothy  Rosen,  Chairman  of  the  Board  and  Chief  Executive  Officer of
VerticalBuyer,  Inc.  (the  "Company")  certify  that:

(1)  the  quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
March  31, 2003 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d));  and

(2)  the  information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


July  21,  2004

                                                     /s/ Timothy Rosen
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Timothy Rosen
                                                     Chairman of the Board
                                                     and Chief Executive Officer



I,  Leslie  Kent, Chief Financial Officer of VerticalBuyer, Inc. (the "Company")
certify  that:

(1)  the  quarterly  report  on  Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
March  31, 2003 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the requirements of
section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d));  and

(2)  the  information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  July  21,  2004

                                                     /s/ Leslie Kent
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Leslie Kent
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                       10
<PAGE>
Order entered March 31, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00331-CV

CITY OF CARROLLTON, Appellant

V.

1533 CRESCENT LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-09123

ORDER

This accelerated appeal follows the trial court’s February 27, 2020 order

denying the City of Carrollton and Brett King, Building Official of the City, In His 

Official Capacity’s plea to the jurisdiction as to claims brought against them by 

1533 Crescent LLC and granting the City and King’s plea as to claims brought 

against them by LRF1 Dallas Logistics 1 LLC (“Longpoint”). Both the City and 

Longpoint have appealed, but the Court’s case management system has designated 
Longpoint’s appeal as a cross-appeal. The appellate record has been filed, and the 

City’s opening brief is currently due April 12, 2020.

Because Longpoint is not a true cross-appellant, we SEVER Longpoint’s 

appeal from this appeal for administrative purposes and assign Longpoint’s appeal 

appellate cause number 05-20-00401-CV. Longpoint’s appeal shall be designated 

as a companion to this appeal and shall be styled LRF1 Dallas Logistics 1 LLC v. 

City of Carrollton and Brett King, Building Official of the City, In His Official 

Capacity.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer Longpoint’s notice of appeal 

and docketing statement as well as a copy of the appellate record and this order to 

cause number 05-20-00401-CV.

We ORDER appellant’s opening brief in each appeal be filed no later than 

April 20, 2020. 

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

BROADSOFT INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CALLWAVE COMMUNICATIONS LLC,

Defendant-Appellant

______________________ 

2018-1124

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:13-cv-00711-RGA, Judge 

Richard G. Andrews.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JONATHAN GARWOOD GRAVES, Cooley LLP, Reston, 

VA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. 

 WILLIAM D. BELANGER, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Boston, 

MA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by 

GREGORY SCOTT BISHOP, CHARLES FOSTER KOCH, Redwood 

City, CA. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and STOLL, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

 October 16, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
TS-UVCA02 

Attachment #13

Other Data Not in the Possession or Control of the Submitter 

The new chemical substance is an acrylate monomer identified under the trade name, Medol10. The compound is manufactured by Osaka Organic Chemical Industry, Ltd. (OOC) 

which is based in Japan. The substance will then be imported by Kowa American 

Corporation (Kowa).
#### John Chris CORNETT, Appellant, v. Polk SAUNDERS et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 16, 1956.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1957.

Joe Hobson, Prestonsburg, Cordell H. Martin, Hindman, for appellant.

Jesse K. Lewis, Lexington, for appellees.

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

John Chris Cornett appeals from a judgment allowing recovery of $2,950 as illegally paid to him by the Floyd County Fiscal Court. This is an action by taxpayers, attacking the validity of an order of the fiscal court authorizing the payment of $50 per month for salary to appellant as Commonwealth’s attorney. It was contended that the payments were compensation in excess of the amount allowed by law.

Two questions concerning the right of the taxpayers to bring the action are decisive of this appeal. They are: (1) was a sufficient demand made upon the fiscal court prior to the bringing of the action; and (2) would such demand have been futile. See Upton v. Whitley County, 310 Ky. 174, 220 S.W.2d 375; Bennett v. Whitley County, Ky., 243 S.W.2d 54.

Both questions were answered adversely to appellees herein in Cooley v. Sturgill, and consolidated cases, Ky., 293 S.W.2d 634, wherein the same memorandum or demand and the same circumstances were considered. Other questions urged on appeal are not reached.

The judgment is reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         370,946
<SECURITIES>                                10,852,872
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,223,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,237,062
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               221,380
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   221,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1600 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1600

  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to take actions to ensure 
     that not fewer than 2 air traffic controllers are on duty and 
  physically situated within the air traffic control room or tower of 
 certain airports at all times during periods of airfield operations, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2011

   Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas introduced the following bill; which was 
     referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to take actions to ensure 
     that not fewer than 2 air traffic controllers are on duty and 
  physically situated within the air traffic control room or tower of 
 certain airports at all times during periods of airfield operations, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Minimum Staffing of Air Traffic 
Controllers Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. MINIMUM STAFFING OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Transportation shall take such 
actions as may be necessary to ensure that, at a covered airport, not 
fewer than 2 air traffic controllers are on duty and physically 
situated within the airport's air traffic control room or tower at all 
times during periods of airfield operations.
    (b) Covered Airport.--In this section, the term ``covered airport'' 
means an airport in the United States at which scheduled commercial air 
carrier operations are provided regularly.
                                 <all>
```
IB 

Union Calendar No. 51 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1667 

[Report No. 112–93] 

To postpone the date for the transfer of functions to the Bureau of Consumer 

Financial Protection if the Bureau does not yet have a Director in place. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2011 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. CANSECO, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. HENSARLING, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, 

Mr. POSEY, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. CAMPBELL, and Mr. RENACCI) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

MAY 27, 2011 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1667 RH

A BILL 

To postpone the date for the transfer of functions to the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection if the Bureau 

does not yet have a Director in place. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 1667 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Consumer 

5 Financial Protection Transfer Clarification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DIRECTOR REQUIRED BEFORE TRANSFER. 

7 Section 1062 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

8 and Consumer Protection Act is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(d) DIRECTOR REQUIRED BEFORE TRANSFER.— 

11 Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, the 

12 single calendar date for the transfer of functions to the 

13 Bureau under section 1061 shall be the later of— 

14 ‘‘(1) the date that would have been designated, 

15 but for the application of this subsection; and 

16 ‘‘(2) the date on which the Director of the Bu17 reau is confirmed by the Senate pursuant to section 

18 1011(b).’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Union Calendar No. 51 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1667 

[Report No. 112–93] 

A BILL 

To postpone the date for the transfer of functions 

place. if the Bureau does not yet have a Director in to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection 

MAY 27, 2011 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


                          THE COAST DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM

                         Computation of Loss Per Share
                          Year Ended December 31, 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Primary     Fully Diluted
                                                                   Loss           Loss
                                                                 Per Share      Per Share
                                                                ----------    -------------
<S>                                                             <C>            <C>
  I.   Weighted Average Shares Outstanding                       5,198,402      5,198,402
                                                                ==========     ==========
 II.   Net Loss                                                 $ (123,000)    $ (123,000)

       Dividends paid on preferred stock of subsidiary             (18,000)       (18,000)
                                                                ----------     ----------
       Net loss attributable to common shareholders             $ (141,000)    $ (141,000)
                                                                ==========     ==========
       Net loss per weighted average shares outstanding             $(0.03)        $(0.03)
                                                                ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
#### John HOLLAND et al., Appellants, v. T. Ed ASHER, Jailer, Bell County, Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

July 11, 1958.

*948J. C. Helton, Julian H. Golden, Pine-ville, for appellants.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., Farmer Plelton, Commonwealth’s Atty., Pineville, Walter C. Herdman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MILLIKEN, Judge.

The appellants, John Holland, Elvin Lewis, Tim Lewis and Everett Miller, charged with murder and shooting and wounding with intent to kill, are in jail without bail and have brought this habeas corpus action in an attempt to obtain their release on bail until the next Grand Jury in October. They assert that they are being held in jail in violation of Section 16 of our Constitution which provides in part that “all prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient securities, unless for capital offenses when the proof is evident or the presumption great.”

Roy Gambrel was shot and killed in front of his home in Bell County about 10:00 p. m., Sunday, June 8, 1958, upon returning from a movie, accompanied by his wife, Ruby. He was shot in the back of the head, twice in his back between the shoulder blades and once in the leg, and died before he could be taken to a hospital. His wife, Ruby, was shot in the abdomen, but survived. Both Ruby and Roy’s mother, Mary Alice Gambrel, identified the appellants as his assassins; they each witnessed the shooting and saw the appellants in the automobile from which the shots were fired. Efforts to discredit their testimony were not convincing. The killing of Roy Gambrel is apparently a sequel to the killing of Melvin Lewis, a brother of two of the appellants, in December, 1957. Roy Gambrel was acquittted of the killing of Melvin Lewis.

We think that the testimony of an eyewitness to a killing must be given great weight and creates a strong presumption of guilt. In denying the bail requested the trial court exercised a sound discretion, and did not act illegally or for reasons insufficient at law. Smith v. Henson, 298 Ky. 182, 182 S.W.2d 666; Wells v. Commonwealth, 299 Ky. 51, 184 S.W.2d 223; Lewis v. Ball, Ky., 299 S.W.2d 810; but see a distinguishing case, Day v. Caudill, Ky., 300 S.W.2d 45.

The judgment is affirmed.