alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lee GULLETT et al., Appellants, v. Noah RUDD et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 1, 1957.

*612Joe Hobson, Prestonsburg, for appellants.

Nickell & Walter, West Liberty, R. B. Harrington, W. B. Hazelrigg, Paintsville, for appellees.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

Appellant, Gullett, was the Democratic candidate and appellee, Rudd, was the Republican candidate for Sheriff of Magoffin County in the November, 1956, election. No other candidate for sheriff appeared on the ballot.

The election commissioner certified a count of 2268 for Gullett and 2209 for Rudd. Rudd filed suit pursuant to KRS 122.100 for a recount. The result of the recount by the circuit court was 2327 for Gullett and 2362 for Rudd. This established the election of Rudd by 35 votes, and judgment was accordingly entered.

On appeal, Gullett and the board of election commissioners contend that the circuit court erroneously counted 83 ballots for Rudd which had been voted in the circle under the device of the Republican Party and also under the emblem of the Independent Party. This contention must be considered under KRS 118.280(2) which directs in pertinent part that “no ballot shall be rejected for any technical error that does not make it impossible to determine the voter’s choice.”

We have carefully examined the ballots in question and have had no difficulty in determining that 80 of these ballots were voted for Rudd. This conclusion is strengthened by the fact that the Independent Party had no candidate for sheriff on its ticket. See, Herndon v. Farmer, 114 Ky. 200, 70 S.W. 632, and Baker v. Dinsmore, 138 Ky. 277, 127 S.W. 997. Under our tabulation of the ballots, Rudd received a majority of the votes cast.

Appellants urge that none of the votes in State Road Fork Precinct No. 2 should have been counted because the stub book was not signed by the commissioners and no tally sheet appeared in the ballot box. The circuit court directed that these ballots be counted after it was verified that the number of voted ballots corresponded to the number of ballots taken out of the ballot book. We are of the opinion that an irregularity of this type is insufficient to destroy the integrity of all ballots cast in that precinct. Preston v. Price, 85 S.W. 1183, 27 Ky.Law Rep. 588; Wilhoit v. Liles, 300 Ky. 564, 189 S.W.2d 851. However, we do wish to observe that there was no change in the majority of the votes Rudd received in this precinct on the recount of the ballots.

Appellants raise a question concerning the counting of two ballots which *613were voted under the device of the Democratic Party and for each individual candidate on the Republican Ticket. It is unnecessary to consider this contention or appellants’ objection to IS absentee ballots because the total of these questioned ballots would not change the result of the election.

Appellants also raise an objection to the circuit court taxing as costs the expense of guarding the ballot boxes prior to the recount. Assuming that this matter is before the court on this appeal, we are of the opinion that the matter was within the discretion of the circuit court.

Judgment affirmed.
1

Eric H. Holder, Jr., has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the

United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).

2

The BIA’s earlier decision denying a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1159(c), and finding Gahamanyi ineligible to adjust his status under 8 U.S.C.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1616

___________

Pacifique Gahamanyi, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.,1

 Attorney General *

of the United States, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: October 8, 2009

Filed: October 14, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pacifique Gahamanyi, a native of Burundi and citizen of Rwanda, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to

reconsider an earlier decision,2

 denying a waiver of inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1159, is not properly before us. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (petition for review must

be filed no later than 30 days of final order of removal); Strato v. Ashcroft, 388 F.3d

651, 654-55 (8th Cir. 2004) (motion to reconsider does not toll time for appeal of

underlying removal order).

-2-

§ 1182(h), and finding him ineligible for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255.

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of a section 1182(h) waiver of

inadmissibility, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (“no court shall have jurisdiction to

review any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section 1182(h)”), and,

absent a waiver of inadmissibility, Gahamanyi is statutorily ineligible to adjust his

status under section 1255, see 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (listing requirements for adjustment

of status); cf. Pinos-Gonzalez v. Mukasey, 519 F.3d 436, 439 (8th Cir. 2008) (appeals

courts not precluded from reviewing nondiscretionary decisions that pertain to

statutory eligibility for discretionary relief). As to the denial of the motion to

reconsider, we find the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion as

untimely. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6) (motion to reconsider must be filed within 30

days of order); Ghasemimehr v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 1160, 1162-63 (8th Cir. 2005)

(per curiam) (BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying untimely motion to reopen).

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

______________________________
#### Irvin NAPIER, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 8, 1957.

M. O. Wheeler, Paintsville, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., Albert G. Rhea, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MONTGOMERY, Judge.

Irvin Napier was indicted for willful murder. He was convicted of the offense of voluntary manslaughter. His punishment was fixed at fifteen years’ confinement.

No bill of exceptions was filed or made a part of this record. Criminal Code of Practice Section 282. Upon motion of the appellee, the transcript of evidence was properly stricken from the record. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, it is presumed that the action of the trial court was correct and that the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict rendered. The only question before the Court is whether the indictment is sufficient to support the verdict. White v. Commonwealth, 225 Ky. 153, 7 S.W.2d 1059; Morgan v. Commonwealth, 284 Ky. 124, 143 S.W.2d 1063; Titsworth v. Commonwealth, 298 Ky. 814, 184 S.W.2d 228; Higgins v. Commonwealth, Ky., 252 S.W.2d 29. The indictment is sufficient.

Judgment is affirmed.
S A N I T I Z E D

EPICLON HP-4700

CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATION TEST
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.15




                                             July 13, 2004


Ameristock Corp.
1320 Harbor Bay Parkway - Suite 145
Alameda, California 94502

Attention:  Mr. Nick Gerber
            Director and Portfolio Manager


                            Re: GigaBeam Corporation

Dear Mr. Gerber:

         This letter confirms the understanding of GigaBeam Corporation
("GigaBeam") and Ameristock Corp. ("Ameristock") with respect to the following
warrants (the "Warrants") issued by GigaBeam to Ameristock. All share number
referred to below refer to the initial number of shares of common stock of
GigaBeam ("Shares") issuable upon exercise of the Warrants, prior to the May 7,
2004 1-1,500 stock split of GigaBeam's common stock

         Warrant No. 1 to purchase 26.67 Shares issued on January 26, 2004;

         Warrant No. 2 to purchase 24 Shares issued on April 19, 2004;

         Warrant No. 3 to purchase 5.33 Shares issued on May 10, 2004;

         Warrant No. 4 to purchase 5.33 Shares issued on June 10, 2004; and

         Warrant No. 5 to purchase 5.33 Shares issued on July 10, 2004.

         Each Warrant is amended to provide that Section 8.3 shall only apply if
the adjustment increases the number of Shares issuable upon exercise of the
Warrant and, in no event, shall the number of Shares issuable upon exercise of
the Warrant be decreased as a result of the application of Section 8.3 thereof.


<PAGE>

Ameristock Corp.
Page 2
July 13, 2004



         If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please execute a copy of
this letter and return it to GigaBeam.


                                               Very truly yours,

                                               GIGABEAM CORPORATION

                                               By: /s/ Louis Slaughter
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                       Louis Slaughter
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED
On this 13th day of July 2004

AMERISTOCK CORP.


By: /s/ Nick Gerber
    ----------------------------------
        Nick Gerber
        Director and Portfolio Manager
Exhibit













April 5, 2018


Dear Ashley,


I am pleased to confirm the details your recent compensation changes at HealthEquity,
Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “the Company”).


The effective date: April 1, 2018.


COMPENSATION PACKAGE
Your salary will be equivalent to $400,000.00 per year and will be paid twice monthly on the 15th and last day of every month, equating to 24 pay periods per calendar year.


As the Executive Vice President & CIO/CTO you will continue to participate in the Company Executive Bonus Plan, where 50% of your base pay will be tied to individual, team and company goals. In determining the amount of bonus pay, the Company shall consider your work performance, and the Company meeting corporate-wide goals. Bonuses are not a guarantee and must be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. Further details of this bonus policy are covered in the Executive Bonus Plan.


In addition to your regular salary and potential bonus, you will also be granted a special one-time equity award in the amount of $1,500,000 of time vested Restricted Stock Units. These RSU’s were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of HealthEquity, Inc. on April 5, 2018. Further details of the restricted stock
unit equity will be provided to you separately.


Should you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (801)727-1274.


Kindly indicate your understanding and acceptance of this offer letter by signing below and returning a copy of the entire document to the People Department.


We look forward to having you continue your association with HealthEquity, Inc. and anticipate a long and successful future together.




Sincerely,


Natalie Atwood
SVP, People
HealthEquity, Inc.




ACCEPTANCE:


By signing this letter, I, Ashley Dreier, accept the compensation terms outlined above for the Executive Vice President and CTO./CIO , at HealthEquity, Inc.


__________________________________________ ____________
Signature Date
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated
March 25, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, included in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of that report in the Companys Registration Statements on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-136846, 333-52876, 333-55941, 333-55933 and
33-64582).



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP
|San Francisco, California   
|March 31, 2008
Exhibit 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-121857) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-93697 and
333-93695) of QMed, Inc. of our reports dated January 27, 2006 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.

Edison, New Jersey
February 9, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 23, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 191 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-193, CP2024-199.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-03658 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# •**~~lim-.y** 810- 00302-015

# .~**~ONTROlNO.** 

# ,CONNECT

February 16, 2010

The Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary United States DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018

_ DeClLSe<:;retary Latl'2Qq:

I am writing in support of Continental Micronesia's application to provide daily nonstop service between Guam and Tokyo Haneda airport. New air service to Haneda, which is scheduled to begin later this year, is made possible by the achievements of your office in securing a wide ranging open skies agreement with Japan. I applaud your efforts on the historic open skies agreement and now urge you to select Continental Micronesia to provide service connecting Guam'stourism and trade industrywith Tokyo's central/downtown airport. Guam's economy in part depends upon tourist traffic from points across the Asian region, with Japan being a critical tourist market for the island. Haneda is ideally situated for the Japanese tourist who lives in central and southern/western Tokyo, and obtaining U.S. carrier scheduled service to/from Hanedawill bea boost to Guam's travel marketing efforts. As Continental Micronesia is the only carrier operating a hubon Guam Continental Micronesia is the right choice for new Haneda service. Communities around Guam such as Saipan will also benefit from one-stop connections at Guam's airport to Haneda. Increased competition by U.S. carriers and the opportunity to choose among Continental Micronesia service and air services offered byJapanese airlines is importantto our island communities. Continental Micronesia's commitment to the Japanese market and our region is proven by the

_____....:......-carrier's recent addition Qfjlights to Fiji and Hong Kong Service to Haneda fllrther**sllpplements---·~-·-----­** the airline's growth, and therefore employment and economic benefits for Guam. Iurgeyou to awardTokyo Hanedaservice to Continental Micronesia and myregion ofthe U.S. All the best.



### Let'sbuildGuam together
543ATop Plaza Bldg. NorthMarine Drive,Tamuning, Guam 96913 Tel.:+1671.888.8888 Fax:+671.647.7840 Website:www.iconnectguam.com
# Europeiska unionens L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0820 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | L 66 |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Lagstiftning | 61 årgången8 mars 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0820

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

L 66

Svensk utgåva

Lagstiftning

61 årgången8 mars 2018

---

| Innehållsförteckning | | Rättelser | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Rättelse till Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2018/302 av den 28 februari 2018 om åtgärder mot omotiverad geoblockering och andra former av diskriminering på grund av kunders nationalitet, bosättningsort eller etableringsort på den inre marknaden och om ändring av förordningarna (EG) nr 2006/2004 och (EU) 2017/2394 samt direktiv 2009/22/EG ( EUT L 60 I, 2.3.2018 ) | 1 |

Innehållsförteckning

Rättelser

Sida

*

Rättelse till Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2018/302 av den 28 februari 2018 om åtgärder mot omotiverad geoblockering och andra former av diskriminering på grund av kunders nationalitet, bosättningsort eller etableringsort på den inre marknaden och om ändring av förordningarna (EG) nr 2006/2004 och (EU) 2017/2394 samt direktiv 2009/22/EG ( EUT L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

( EUT L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

1

| SV | De rättsakter vilkas titlar är tryckta med fin stil är sådana rättsakter som har avseende på den löpande handläggningen av jordbrukspolitiska frågor. De har normalt en begränsad giltighetstid.
  Beträffande alla övriga rättsakter gäller att titlarna är tryckta med fetstil och föregås av en asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

SV

De rättsakter vilkas titlar är tryckta med fin stil är sådana rättsakter som har avseende på den löpande handläggningen av jordbrukspolitiska frågor. De har normalt en begränsad giltighetstid.

Beträffande alla övriga rättsakter gäller att titlarna är tryckta med fetstil och föregås av en asterisk.

---

Rättelser

| 8.3.2018 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

L 66/1

---

Rättelse till Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2018/302 av den 28 februari 2018 om åtgärder mot omotiverad geoblockering och andra former av diskriminering på grund av kunders nationalitet, bosättningsort eller etableringsort på den inre marknaden och om ändring av förordningarna (EG) nr 2006/2004 och (EU) 2017/2394 samt direktiv 2009/22/EG

(
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning L 60 I av den 2 mars 2018
  )

Sidan 14, underskriften

I stället för:

”
  På Europaparlamentets vägnar

L. PAVLOVA

Ordförande

På rådets vägnar

A. TAJANI

Ordförande
  ”

ska det stå:

”
  På Europaparlamentets vägnar

A. TAJANI

Ordförande

På rådets vägnar

L. PAVLOVA

Ordförande
  ”

---
Order entered October 31, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00952-CV

IN RE DARLA JALANE EDDINS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-13-23371

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we GRANT relator’s motion to dismiss and 

DISMISS this original proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We ORDER relator to bear 

the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ JASON BOATRIGHT 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION1



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Daniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated (the Company), and Susan M. Kanaya, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of May 9, 2005.



/s/ Daniel V. SantiDaniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Susan M. KanayaSusan M. KanayaSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer




---

|1 | This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kosan Biosciences Incorporated and will be retained by Kosan Biosciences Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.