alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jornal Oficial C 340/2016

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 340 |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 59.° ano16 de setembro de 2016 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 340

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

59.° ano16 de setembro de 2016

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informações |
| | INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA |
| | Parlamento EuropeuConselho |
| 2016/C 340/01 | Declaração da Comissão relativa ao Regulamento (UE) 2016/1627 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 14 de setembro de 2016, que estabelece um plano plurianual de recuperação do atum-rabilho no Atlântico Este e no Mediterrâneo, e que revoga o Regulamento (CE) n.o 302/2009 do Conselho | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

IV   Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Parlamento EuropeuConselho

2016/C 340/01

Declaração da Comissão relativa ao Regulamento (UE) 2016/1627 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 14 de setembro de 2016, que estabelece um plano plurianual de recuperação do atum-rabilho no Atlântico Este e no Mediterrâneo, e que revoga o Regulamento (CE) n.o 302/2009 do Conselho

o

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

IV Informações

INFORMAÇÕES DAS INSTITUIÇÕES, ÓRGÃOS E ORGANISMOS DA UNIÃO EUROPEIA

Parlamento Europeu Conselho

| 16.9.2016 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2016

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

C 340/1

---

Declaração da Comissão relativa ao Regulamento (UE) 2016/1627 do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, de 14 de setembro de 2016, que estabelece um plano plurianual de recuperação do atum-rabilho no Atlântico Este e no Mediterrâneo, e que revoga o Regulamento (CE) n.o 302/2009 do Conselho (1)

(2016/C 340/01)

A Comissão exprime a sua preocupação pelo facto de os limitados poderes que nela delegaram os colegisladores poderem prejudicar a transposição tempestiva para o direito da União Europeia das medidas que a ICCAT tomar futuramente no sentido da revisão ou atualização do seu regime de controlo.

Por conseguinte, a Comissão declara considerar que este regulamento não prejudica qualquer posição que esta instituição venha a tomar quanto ao recurso aos artigos 290.o e 291.o do TFUE para a transposição de medidas da organização regional de gestão das pescas.

A Comissão reserva-se ainda o direito de propor alterações do regulamento tendentes a aumentar o número de medidas que devem ser adotadas por atos delegados ou atos de execução, caso a transposição através do procedimento legislativo ordinário origine atrasos que ponham em risco a capacidade da UE de cumprir as suas obrigações internacionais.

---

(1)  JO L 252 de 16.9.2016, p. 1.

---
#### MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. and Subsidaries, petitioners, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 02-1200.

Supreme Court of United States

March 24, 2003.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0469

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHESTER BAUER,

Defendant and Appellant.

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE OPENING BRIEF AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT

Upon consideration of Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Opening Brief, and good cause appearing;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time 

to and including November 15, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellant’s Opening Brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 22 2021

09/22/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0469
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.2

                   [FORM OF NOTATION OF SUBSIDIARY GUARANTEE]


         For value received, each Guarantor (which term includes any successor
Person under the Indenture) has, jointly and severally, unconditionally
guaranteed, to the extent set forth in the Indenture and subject to the
provisions in the Indenture dated as of June 22, 2004 (the "Indenture") among
IASIS Healthcare LLC, (the "Company"), IASIS Capital Corporation ("IASIS
Capital," and together with the Company, the "Issuers"), the Guarantors party
thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (the
"Trustee"), (a) the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium and
Special Interest, if any, and interest on, the Notes, whether at maturity, by
acceleration, redemption or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of interest
on overdue principal of and interest on the Notes, if any, if lawful, and the
due and punctual performance of all other Obligations of the Issuers to the
Holders or the Trustee all in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and (b)
in case of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of
such other Obligations, that the same shall be promptly paid in full when due or
performed in accordance with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether at
stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The obligations of the Guarantors
to the Holders and to the Trustee pursuant to the Subsidiary Guarantee and the
Indenture are expressly set forth in Article 11 of the Indenture and reference
is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms of the Subsidiary
Guarantee. Each Holder of a Note, by accepting the same, (a) agrees to and shall
be bound by such provisions, (b) authorizes and directs the Trustee, on behalf
of such Holder, to take such action as may be necessary or appropriate to
effectuate the subordination as provided in the Indenture and (c) appoints the
Trustee attorney-in-fact of such Holder for such purpose.

         Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given
to them in the Indenture.


                                       [NAME OF GUARANTOR(S)]

                                       By:
                                           -----------------------------------
                                       Name:
                                       Title:
Order entered February 15, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01296-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION, Appellant

V.

THE MIAN DEVELOPMENT CORP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-10320

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s February 12, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to 

file a reply brief. Appellant shall file its reply brief on or before March 4, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A0573. JOHNSON STREET PROPERTIES, LLC v. CYNTHIA CLURE.

After plenary consideration, we have determined that the application for

interlocutory appeal in this case was improvidently granted. Accordingly, the order

granting the application is vacated, and the appeal is dismissed. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

05/04/2015

May 04, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION1



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Daniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated (the
Company), and Susan M. Kanaya, Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and



2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of August 9, 2004.



/s/ Daniel V. SantiDaniel V. Santi, M.D., Ph.D.Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Susan M. KanayaSusan M. KanayaSenior Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


---

|1 | This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Kosan Biosciences Incorporated under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kosan Biosciences Incorporated and will be retained by Kosan
Biosciences Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

45) IV-C-11 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:53 AM Sheet 45 of 232 
4**4* 

P__2 

R'-ft7-_ti 

* 

^ 

_.%(«*^ 

1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C 20460 

DEC 2 4 I98T 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable William S. Broomfield 

U.S. House of Representatives 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Mr. Broomfield: 

Thank you for passing along the comments of Mr. Norman W. 

Boyer concerning EPA's proposal to require onboard refueling 

emission controls. Be assured that these comments will be 

considered as we prepare our Final Rule. We will also be 

placing them in the public docket for the Rule (Docket No. 

A-87-11). 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

DONALD E. ZING 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11 
P.3 

1

 <i-_LIVLl , 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

JAN I I 1988
Exhibit 32(b)

AMERICANWEST BANCORPORATION

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Diane L. Kelleher, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Financial Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge

 the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the periodic report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and


the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                                                     
|----- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/ Diane L. Kelleher                               
|Title |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: |  | January 22, 2007
#### ROGER C. TOLLES ET AL. *v.*MARK W. CASTRO, TRUSTEE, ET AL.

(12445)

Sehaller, Spear and Hennessy, Js.

Submitted on briefs December 14, 1995

decision released January 23, 1996

*Barry L. Thompson,*for the appellants (plaintiffs).

*Peter M. Lemer,*for the appellees (defendant Henry Bock et al.).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Digicorp (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



February 23, 2007                            /s/ William B. Horne
                                             -------------------------------
                                             William B. Horne
                                             Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SS.1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Century  Park  Pictures  Corporation
(Company) on Form 10-KSB (Report) for the year ended May 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof. I, Thomas K. Scallen,
Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify to the best
of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas K. Scallen
--------------------------
Thomas K. Scallen
Chief Executive and
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: November 4, 2003
1491 0-1 ~,:t;,,,,,,,",,,:::::=

RmmN"'H'HOL

,"

1110 - (! U.

'~~

)AI~

?1/2idY

.\"''''''''' sn.ll<OL

f I -fr3

..-

'<i""i/~'"

"O\lf\N(; SY,~lOL

1¥~ij.(SYi\

- itt:;',- ,

-'~

~h~;b9"

~0'Jf'''';S'~1BOl.- ,

,.." ~et

NII'IAl$.'SI(]

( .(..E-~

ATE

'1/2--'L, IJ"" ,

UTINGHMUOL

N'J""-- \\'\

st

~~

)

;1;lJ110 ~

c

~""JnNG SY"O<aL

i\l'lM-- )6i Nn~/

7

o<.m~GSy,n>o'-

AN\'J\-~(OO

NlT1.\~,,; •

~ 'I,,,"\'{;I'"

;;m:

\2-1 ;,fc'?

'.<>UT''''' ,V>.lliO'-

,

"'Tt~LSi,a,,

~'''Tr

* * * *

* * * Revision 00 of AlRBUS A340 ALS Part 3:

- adds ne\v CMR (Ccltificatioll Maintenance Requirements) tasks

associated with modifications,

- revises the apphcabllity of some CMR tasks,

- revises some CMR tasks with increased intervals,

- revises a CMR task with a more restrictive interval,

- deletes CMR task 282300-B0002-1-C * 0:< * .

Oliginated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an LtnSa~

ACTION: Final rule; request for conmlents.

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl desclibes the unsafe condition as:

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (F.Au";.), Dcpaliment of Transp0rlafion

Airplanes

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A340-200. -300, -500. and -600 Series

RLN Z120-AA64

Some of those changes const1tllte more restrictive requirements for

aeroplane configuration already in service. Failure to comply with this

Revision 00 of AIRBUS A340 ALS Part 3 constitutes an unsafe condition.

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl

Federal Aviation Administration

(DOT).

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATlON

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new ajrwo~h1l1ess directive (AD) for the products Ii

14 CFR Part 39

IDocket No. FAA-Z009J":h8,?Direetorate Identifier Z009-NM-088-AD; ,~,~~~ - ,

~~.'- Amendment 39_-;"*H,~';AD 2009-'"'*-**1
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40 

### ★
▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  VerticalBuyer,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
Rosen,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that;

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.

      A  signed  original  of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

Date:  June 30, 2004

                                                /s/ Timothy  Rosen
                                                -------------------------
                                                Timothy  Rosen
                                                Chief  Executive  Officer


                                       10
<PAGE>
#### Hanis HENSON, Petitioner, v. William DIXON, Judge of Clay Circuit Court, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 11, 1957.

T. T. Burchell, Manchester, for petitioner.

William Dixon, pro se.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

Hanis Henson has petitioned this Court for an order of mandamus requiring Judge William Dixon of the Clay Circuit Court to rule on a motion for a new trial tendered by Henson after conviction on a felony charge.

On February 7, 1957, Henson was tried in the Clay Circuit Court on a charge of murder. The jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of voluntary manslaughter and fixing his punishment at 21 years in the penitentiary. A document styled “Order and Judgment” was prepared under date of February 7, but it was not in fact a judgment, in conformity with Section 284 of the Criminal Code of Practice; it merely recited the facts concerning the holding of the trial and the return of the verdict. Furthermore it appears that this order was not signed during the term.

The term ended on February 9, which was a Saturday. On Monday, February 11, Henson tendered his motion and grounds for a new trial, but the trial judge refused to allow the same to be filed, and refused to rule on the motion. It is recited in Henson’s petition to this Court, and in the response of the judge that Henson was “sentenced” thereafter on February 11, but the *920order of sentence, which presumably constituted the judgment in the case (see Lovelace v. Commonwealth, 285 Ky. 326, 147 S.W.2d 1029) has *not been*supplied in the record before us, notwithstanding our request to the respondent that he transmit a copy of the judgment.

From the record before us, it appears that judgment was not entered during the term at which the trial was held, and that the motion for a new trial was made before judgment was entered, after the term. Under Section 273 of the Criminal Code the motion was made in time, so as to require a ruling upon it by the judge.

Accordingly, an order will issue commanding the respondent to direct the filing of and to rule upon the motion and grounds for a new trial made by Henson in the case hereinbefore described.
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      Exhibit 21
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

         The following is a list of all subsidiaries of First Equity Properties,
Inc., the state or other jurisdiction of organization or incorporation and the
names under which such subsidiaries do business (indention means direct parent
relationship):


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      Jurisdiction of
                                                                                      Organization or
                           Name of Entity                                              Incorporation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------            ----------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>
First Equity Properties, Inc.*                                                            Nevada

         Carmel Realty, Inc.                                                               Texas

                  Regis Management Corporation (formerly Williamsburg                     Nevada
                  Management Corporation)
</TABLE>
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE

OF MARYLAND COURT OF APPEALS * OF MARYLAND

Petitioner, * Misc. Docket AG

* No.

AUBREY PAIGE POPPLETON

Respondent.

* September Term, 2018

,fi

ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance

Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Aubrey Paige Poppleton, to indefinitely

suspend the Respondent from the practice of law for violations of Rules 8.4(a), (b) and (d)

of the Maryland Attorney's Rules of Prof-essional Conduct. The Court having considered

the Petition, and the record herein, it is this _ day of _,2018;

ORDERED, that the Respondent, Aubrey Paige Poppleton, be indefinitely

suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Aubrey Paige

Poppleton from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the trustees of

the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in

this State in accordance with Maryland Rule 19-762(b).