alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1761 

To reauthorize the Marine Turtle Conservation Act of 2004, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 5, 2011 

Mr. PIERLUISI (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of 

California, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. MORAN, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. SABLAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Marine Turtle Conservation Act of 2004, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Marine Turtle Con5 servation Reauthorization Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO PROVISIONS PREVENTING FUND7 ING OF PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Marine Turtle Conservation 

9 Act of 2004 is amended— 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1761 IH

1 (1) in section 2(b) (16 U.S.C. 6601(b)), by 

2 striking ‘‘in foreign countries’’; 

3 (2) in section 3(2) (16 U.S.C. 6602(2))— 

4 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 

5 (A), by striking ‘‘in foreign countries’’; and 

6 (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘of 

7 foreign countries’’; and 

8 (3) in section 4 (16 U.S.C. 6603)— 

9 (A) in subsection (b)(1)(A), by inserting 

10 ‘‘State or’’ before ‘‘foreign country’’; and 

11 (B) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘in for12 eign countries’’. 

13 (b) STATE DEFINED.—Section 3 of such Act (16 

14 U.S.C. 6602) is amended by adding at the end the fol15 lowing new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(7) STATE.—The term ‘State’ means each of 

17 the several States of the United States, the District 

18 of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, 

19 American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the North20 ern Mariana Islands, any other territory or posses21 sion of the United States, and any Indian tribe.’’. 

22 SEC. 3. LIMITATIONS ON EXPENDITURES. 

23 Section 5(b) of the Marine Turtle Conservation Act 

24 of 2004 (16 U.S.C. 6604(b)) is amended— 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1761 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘$80,000’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘$150,000’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON PROJECTS IN THE UNITED

6 STATES.—Not less than 20 percent of the amounts 

7 made available from the Fund for any fiscal year 

8 may be used for projects relating to the conservation 

9 of marine turtles in the United States.’’. 

10 SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE MARINE TURTLE CON11 SERVATION ACT OF 2004. 

12 Section 7 of the Marine Turtle Conservation Act of 

13 2004 (16 U.S.C. 6606) is amended by striking ‘‘each of 

14 fiscal years 2005 through 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘each of 

15 fiscal years 2012 through 2017’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned hereby certify that the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Midwest, L.P. (the "Registrant") for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

| | /s/MICHAEL S. WILLNERMichael S. Willner Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerInsight Midwest, L.P.
November 14, 2007
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/JOHN ABBOTJohn Abbot Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerInsight Midwest, L.P.
November 14, 2007

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit
32





Section
1350 Certifications




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of IsoRay, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:




To my
knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  September
28, 2010




/s/ Dwight BabcockDwight
      BabcockChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





Dated:  September
28, 2010





/s/ Brien L. RagleBrien
      l. ragleController(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6430

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DARRYL ROBINSON, SR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cr - 00373

- CCB

- 1; 1:18

- cv - 01815

- CCB )

Submitted : September 26, 2019 Decided: September 30, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Darryl Robinson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Clinton Jacob Fuchs, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Darryl Robinson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying as time

barred Robinson’s amended and supplemented 28 U.S.C . § 2255 (20 12 ) motion. * The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive
proce dural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. Accordi ngly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

* Robinson purported to seek relief from his federal conviction and sentence through 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (20 12 ) . The district court provided proper notice, p ursuant to Castro v. United States , 540 U.S. 375, 377 (2003), of its intent to recharacterize Robinson’s § 2241 petition as an initial § 2255 motion, allowed Robinson to supplement and amend his claims, and proceeded to analyze the advanced claims under § 2255.3 are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Richard L. Feinstein, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|April 25, 2018 | /s/ Richard L. Feinstein        
|-------------- | --------------------------------
|               | Richard L. Feinstein            
|               | Vice President - Finance and    
|               | Chief Financial Officer         
|               | (Principal Financial Officer and
|               | Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
 **OF**
 **THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report of I-trax, Inc. (the **“Company”** )
        on Form
        10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the **“Report”** ),
        I,
        David R. Bock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
        David R. Bock
 David
        R.
        Bock
 Executive
        Vice President and
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 
 August
        14, 2006
Exhibit
      10.5




Summary
      of Outside Director Compensation Plan





On
      September 12, 2005, the Boards of Directors of First Security Bancorp, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) and First Security Bank of Lexington, Inc. (the “Bank”) approved
      establishing a compensation plan for directors of the Company and the Bank
      who
      are not employees of either the Company or the Bank. This compensation plan
      provides for the payment to each outside director of a one-time $3,500 stipend
      plus a per meeting fee for meetings held after July 1, 2005 per the following
      schedule:





·
            Board
                of Director meetings - $550 fee per meeting or $750 per meeting in
                the
                case of an outside director serving as Chairman of the
                Board





·
            Nomination,
                Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors
                of the Company - $200 fee per committee meeting or $500 in the case
                of the
                Chairman of such committee





·
            Audit
                Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company or of the Bank
                - $200
                fee per committee meeting or $500 in the case of the Chairman of
                such
                committee





·
            Asset
                Liability Management/Investment Committee of the Board of Directors
                of the
                Bank - $200 fee per committee meeting or $500 in the case of the
                Chairman
                of such committee





·
            Director
                Loan Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank - $100 fee per
                committee meeting





Under
      the
      compensation plan, an outside director, other than when serving as Chairman
      of
      the Board or as Chairman of a Committee, must be present at the meeting (in
      person or by teleconference) to receive a fee if the director has missed two
      or
      more meetings during the prior twelve month period. Outside directors serving
      on
      the Board of Directors of both the Bank and the Company who attend a joint,
      concurrent or consecutive meeting of both Boards, or of the same committee
      of
      both Boards, or any combination of same, would be paid for attending such
      meetings as if they only attended one Board or committee meeting. Fees would
      be
      paid promptly as they accrue.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43001

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

SAMUEL DAVID FORD,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 677

Filed: October 28, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years with three years 

determinate, and a consecutive sentence of ten years indeterminate, for two counts 

of felony injury to children, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Samuel David Ford pled guilty to two counts of felony injury to children. Idaho Code § 

18-1501(1). The district court sentenced Ford to a unified term of ten years with three years 

determinate, and a consecutive sentence of ten years indeterminate. Ford appeals asserting that 

the district court abused its discretion by imposing excessive sentences.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ford’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 12th day of May, 2003.




                                                   /s/ Albert R. Rietheimer
                                                   ------------------------
                                                       Albert R. Rietheimer
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                              and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp
Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2010 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard S. Dziadzio, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/  Richard S. Dziadzio
                                  ------------------------
                                  Richard S. Dziadzio
                                  Senior Executive Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer

Date:  March 10, 2011
IMAGE TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC.

                     EXHIBIT 32.1 - ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Image Technology Laboratories, Inc.,
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Barry Muradian, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/S/ BARRY C. MURADIAN
-----------------------
BARRY C. MURADIAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
JUNE 13, 2005





                                      -20-
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002), we,  the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Peoples Educational Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby
certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
May 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August
9, 2010





/s/
      Brian T. BeckwithBrian
      T. Beckwith,President
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/
      Michael L. DeMarcoMichael
      L. DeMarco,Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                       OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the quarterly report of I-trax, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Bock, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



/s/ David Bock
--------------
David Bock
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2004


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

J^^t'- h O r 

In the Matter of: 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

FAA Docket No. CPlONMOOl 1 

FAA Case No. 2008NM700127 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0977 

Judge: Richard C. Goodwin 

IS 

The HoQorable Richard C. Goodwin: 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Please enter the appearance of Glenn P. Wicks and Roncevert D. Almond as attorneys of 

record for Federal Express Corporation, Respondent in the above-referenced action. Service of 

all papers by U.S. Mail, expedited courier service, and personal delivery should be addressed as 

follows: 

Glenn P. Wicks 

Roncevert D. Almond 

The Wicks Group, PLLC 

1215 17'^ Street, NW 

Sumner Annex, Fourth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036 

Tel: (202) 457-7790 

Fax: (202) 457-7799 

VED 

\:r.i •[ f 2011 

\4vj„ iH-^G DOCKET 

Dated this 18^*^ day of May, 2011. 

Wicks 

^ Roncevert D. Almond 

The Wicks Group, PLLC 

1215 17'^ Street, NW 

Sumner Annex, Fourth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036 

Tel: (202) 457-7790 

Fax: (202) 457-7799 

Counsel for Respondent 

1 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing document has been sent via facsimile and expedited 

courier service to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC'430 

Fax:(202)493-5142 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Tel: (202) 366-2139 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

Mr. Kyle Lomazow, Attorney 

Mr. Scott Morris, Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel (ANM-7) 

1601 LindAve., S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

Tel: (425) 227-1847 

Fax; (425) 227-1007 

One (1) copy and original 

One (1) copy 

One (1) copy 

>ih Dated this 18'" day of May, 2011. 

RcjBCeveirt). Almond 

he Wicks Group, PLLC 

1215 17^^ Street, NW 

Sumner Annex, Fourth Floor 

Washington, DC 20036 

Tel: (202) 457-7790 

Fax: (202) 457-7799 

Counsel for Respondent