alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### FOR DOCKET:Fw: EO 12866 13563 Interagency Comments EPA NPRM Tailoring Step 3 Juan Santiago to: Pam Long 02/24/2012 01:57 PM From: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US To: Pam Long/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA ----- Forwarded by Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/ US on 02/24/2012 01:57 PM ----- From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine

_J.

_ Kymn@omb.eop.gov> To: Juan Santiago/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Anna Wood/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/22/2012 04:33 PM Subject: EO 12866 13563 Interagency Comments EPA NPRM Tailoring Step 3 

### Hi Juan and Anna, Attached please find interagency comments received thus far. I'll give you a ring shortly. Thanks! Christine Interagencycomments1 EO 1286613563EPA NPRM Tailoring Step 3.docx Interagencycomments2 EO1286613563_EPA NPRM Tailoring_Rule_Step_3.docx
Exhibit 10.15 E-Z- EM Inc.
iPark Building, Suite LL-26
1111 Marcus Avenue
Lake Success, NY 11042 June 18, 2005 Kalaty Properties, Corp.
443 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016
Attention: Farshad Kalaty
Fax: 212-689-2705 Copy to:
Zaccaria & Sasson
175 East Shore Road
Great Neck, NY 11023
Attention: William Zaccaria
Fax: 516-487-1497 BY FACSIMILE
BY REGISTERED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT RE:
Agreement for Purchase and Sale of 717 Main Street, Westbury, New York Gentlemen: We refer to the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of 717
Main Street, Westbury, New York (the Property), dated as of May 19, 2005 (the
Agreement) between E-Z-Em Inc. (the Seller) and Kalaty Properties Corp.
(the Buyer). All terms used herein and not defined shall have the meaning set
forth in the Agreement. Seller hereby agrees to extend the Diligence Period,
as defined in the Agreement, to end on the earlier of (i) the waiving or the
satisfaction of the environmental contingency set forth in Section 3.1(a) of
the Agreement by notice to Seller or (ii) 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on
July 22, 2005, TIME BEING OF THE ESSENCE. Very truly yours, E-Z-EM INC. By:
  /s/
  Dennis
  J. CurtinName:
  Dennis
  J. CurtinTitle:
  Senior
  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer -129-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for fiscal ended DEC-31-00
</LEGEND>

<S>                             		<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   	12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        		DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>				JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     	DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                   	3
<SECURITIES>                        	0
<RECEIVABLES>                    		2069
<ALLOWANCES>                   		40
<INVENTORY>                       		2702
<CURRENT-ASSETS>          			5306
<PP&E>                                  	2351
<DEPRECIATION>                   		1522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>       	             	6149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>  			     	2133
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                               	43
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY> 	0
<PREFERRED>                            	0
<OTHER-SE>                          	3864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>			6149
<SALES>                                   9907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         	9907
<CGS>                                 	6198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   		6198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              		(1)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    	0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                		38
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    		(138)
<INCOME-TAX>                          	(98)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 	(40)
<DISCONTINUED>                      	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 		0
<CHANGES>                          		0
<NET-INCOME>                          	(40)
<EPS-BASIC>                          	(.1)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        	(.1)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sino-Biotics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Lennox, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Sole Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sino-Biotics, Inc., and will be retained by Sino-Biotics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    /s/   David Lennox David Lennox, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Operations Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Sole Director   Date: February 14, 2007
exv4w4



 





Guarantee




     For value received, Ainsworth Engineered Corp., the Guarantor (which term
includes any successor Person under the Indenture) has unconditionally
guaranteed, to the extent set forth in the Indenture (as defined below) and
subject to the provisions in the Indenture dated as of March 3, 2004 as amended
by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto dated as of May 19, 2004 (as
amended, the “Indenture”) among Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd., a corporation
amalgamated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia and The Bank of
New York, as Trustee (the “Trustee”), (a) the due and punctual payment of the
principal of, premium and Special Interest, if any, and interest on the Notes
(as defined in the Indenture), whether at maturity, by acceleration, redemption
or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of interest on overdue principal and
premium, and, to the extent permitted by law, interest, and the due and
punctual performance of all other obligations of the Company to the Holders or
the Trustee all in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and (b) in case
of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of such
other obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due or
performed in accordance with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether at
stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The obligations of the
Guarantor to the Holders of Notes and to the Trustee pursuant to this
Subsidiary Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set forth in the Indenture
and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms of the
Subsidiary Guarantee.



     The laws of the State of New York shall govern and be used to construe
this Subsidiary Guarantee.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Ainsworth Engineered Corp.

 	 
	 	By:  	                                    /s/ Catherine Ainsworth
 	 
	 	 	Catherine Ainsworth 	 
	 	 	Secretary
### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2021 ND 1 8 7

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Amy Lynn Woodruff, D efendant and Appellant

No. 20210026

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bobbi Brown Weiler , Judge.

AFFIRMED

. Per Curiam.

Anna A. Argenti , Assistant State’s Attorney, and Dominic Davis, third

- year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, B i smarck, ND , for plaintif f and appellee; submitted on brief.

Kiara C. Kraus

- Parr, Grand Forks, ND , for defendant and appellant.1 State v. Woodruff No. 20210026

Per Curiam.
[¶1] Amy Lynn Woodruff appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of preventing arrest. Woodruff argues the evidence at trial was insufficient to support her conviction, because the force required to remove Woodruff from her vehicle was not “substantial force” as required by N.D.C.C. § 12.1

- 08

- 02(1). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude substantial evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 14760A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–4228

Mr. Chad Brown

Twin City Aerial

2354 Fairview Lane

Mound, MN 55364

Dear Mr. Brown:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter dated February 20, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Twin City Aerial (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your 

current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 

61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and 

(2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the 

petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You requested an amendment to change the company 

name from Chad Brown to Twin City Aerial.

1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the 

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 14760

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Twin City Aerial is hereafter referred to as the operator. All 

conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 14760 remain in effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on February 28, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION





Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bertram  Cutler,  President  and CFO of Global  Assets & Services,  Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10QSB of the  Company  for the  period  ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         Dated:  August 9, 2004           Officer:   Bertram Cutler

                                        Name:       /s/ Bertram Cutler
                                                    ----------------------------
                                        Position:  President, CFO
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sen Yu International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Tongyu Zhang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.








Date: December 2, 2010





By:  /s/ Tongyu Zhang


Name: Tongyu Zhang


Title: Chief Financial Officer













This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C!!ust.er C!!nuuty C!!nmmissinu 

C!tnuuty nf C!tusttr 

1010 Main • MILES CITY, MONTANA 59301 

April13, 2013 

Docket Operations M-30 

West Building Ground Floor W 12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590; 3 

United States of America 

Department of Transportation 

Office of Secretary 

Washington, DC 

RE: Docket DOS-OST-1997-2605 

To Whom It May Concern: 

It would be detrimental both economically and professionally to terminate the EAS for Miles City and 

Lelll(istown and for the other five cities. The Custer County Commissioners are asking the USDOT to 

reconsider this termination, to allow Miles City and Lewistown time to resolve this issue of low ridership. 

We are confident the low ridership issue will be resolved. 

The low number of ticket sales is a result of several issues: 

1. Timing of the arrival in Billings makes it difficult for connecting flights to the major 

airport hubs, causing six to seven hour layovers and sometimes an overnight stay to 

catch a flight the next morning. With Miles City and Lewistown being Jess than 150 

miles of pavement from Billings, it's efficient use of time to drive to Billings just in time 

for the connecting flight. 

2. Assertive Marketing would have phone numbers and schedules in the publications in 

the area. It's rather difficult when the average citizen wants to buy a ticket and doesn't 

know the name of the airline nor a schedule. 

TOO 406-87 4-3457 

Commissioners 406-874-3350 • 406-874-3351 • 406-874·3352 
3. Recruiting professionals in the medical field from Denver is easier on the family when a 

direct flight to Denver is available. 

4. Major employers in Miles City had been significant users when EAS had good 

connections. 

a. Holy Rosary Healthcare, our Medical Center has headquarters in Denver. 

b. Sanjel USA has their National Headquarters in Denver as well as recruiting riew 

employees regularly, 

c. Ft Keogh has their regional offices in Denver. 

d. OptiBiend, Inc. is a growing and major employer with Headquarters in Texas using· 

Denver as their major access to Montana. 

We are asking you to reconsider the termination of Miles City and Lewistown. Let us be part of the 

resolution not the deterioration in making EAS utilized to the maximum. 

Vicki Hamilton 

Custer County Commissioner 

Essential Air Service Task Force Member 

1010 Main 

Miles City, MT 59301 

v.hamilton@co.custer.mt.us 

406-874-3352 

C: Debbie Alke, Department of Transportation Aeronautics Division, Senator Jon Tester's Office, Senator 

Max Baucus' Office, Representative Steve Daines' Office
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002





Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Entravision Communications
Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      November 6, 2009
              
              /s/
      WALTER F. ULLOAWalter
      F. UlloaChief
      Executive Officer
  Date:
      November 6, 2009
              
              /s/
      CHRISTOPHER T. YOUNGChristopher
      T. YoungChief
      Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1838 

To repeal a provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act prohibiting any Federal bailout of swap dealers or participants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2011 

Ms. HAYWORTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal a provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

and Consumer Protection Act prohibiting any Federal 

bailout of swap dealers or participants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 Section 716 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

5 and Consumer Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 8305) is re6 pealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 140 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 140

To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 
    those classes of individuals born in the United States who are 
         nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

  Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mr. Gary G. 
 Miller of California, and Mr. Woodall) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to clarify 
    those classes of individuals born in the United States who are 
         nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Birthright Citizenship Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH FOR CERTAIN PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    (a) In General.--Section 301 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1401) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
        following'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (a) through (h) as 
        paragraphs (1) through (8), respectively; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Definition.--Acknowledging the right of birthright 
citizenship established by section 1 of the 14th amendment to the 
Constitution, a person born in the United States shall be considered 
`subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States for purposes of 
subsection (a)(1) if the person is born in the United States of 
parents, one of whom is--
            ``(1) a citizen or national of the United States;
            ``(2) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in 
        the United States whose residence is in the United States; or
            ``(3) an alien performing active service in the armed 
        forces (as defined in section 101 of title 10, United States 
        Code).''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a)(3) shall 
not be construed to affect the citizenship or nationality status of any 
person born before the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed January 31, 20 12

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

_____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00024

- CV

______________ JOHN J. PRESTON AND MONICA S. PRESTON , Appellant s

V.

MICHAEL A. INGLIS AND ALLEN GREGORY ALPER , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 122nd District Court Galveston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10CV2676



### O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed September 23, 2011. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial

. The notice of appeal was due December 22, 2011

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed his notice of appeal on January 6, 2012 , a date within 15 days of the due date for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is

A necessarily implied when the perfecting instrument is filed within f ifteen days of its due
date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the2

late filing. See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd. , 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. App.

C Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.).
Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to file the
notice o f appeal within ten (10) days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; 12 .5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DEION POWELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 313 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of December, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### R. G. WUNEBURGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27622.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 18, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, ■ Dist. Atty.,'Eugene Brady, Jr., and Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist,-Attys., Houston, Leon Douglas, State s Atty., Austin, for the State.. ' ■ ■

PER CURIAM.

The offense is knowingly passing, -a forged instrument; the -punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of .exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Order entered February 15, 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 12

- 01296

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULA TION, Appellant

V.

THE MIAN DEVELOPMENT CORP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 10320

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s February 12, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to

file a reply brief. Appellant shall file its reply brief on or before March 4, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIG HT

CHIEF JUSTICE