alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order issued March 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 5
- 00 218
- CV

——————————— IN RE TRACY M. GIBBS , R elator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

ORDER Relator has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and requested temporary relief. * The Court is of the opinion that relator’s petition requires further
consideration

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(b). Accordingly, the Court grants the relator’s request for temporary relief. The Sheriff of Harris County is hereby

* The underlying case is In the interest of [C.M.G.] , cause number 200 1

- 25797, pending in the 257 th Dist rict C ourt of Harris County, Tex as, the Hon. Judy Warne presiding

.2

ordered to discharge relator from custody on relator executing and filing with the
Sheriff of Harris County a good and sufficient bond, conditioned as required by law, in the amount of $ 5 00.00. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(b)(3). This order will remain in effect until the case in this Court is finally decided or until further order
from this Court.
It is further ordered that the real party in interest shall have until March 24 , 201 5 to file a response brief , if any

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.4, 52.8(b)(1).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack
Date: March 10, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DOMINIC O. ROACH,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 70 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       



|Date: August 10, 2009
|---------------------



| | /s/ Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The State, ex rel. Baird, Appellant, *v.*Schroy, Mayor, et al., Appellees.

(No. 27240

Decided February 23, 1939.)

*96
      *Mr. W. E. Pardee*and *Messrs. Burch & Baird,*for appellant.

*Mr. Wade DeWoody,*director of law, and *Mr. Ear-old L. Mull,*for appellees.

By the Court.

By Section 109 of the amended charter, the people of Akron protected persons holding positions pursuant to appointment from eligible lists and those who had been continuously in the service in the same position for three years preceding the effective date of the amendments. The appellant did not come within either of those requirements, and therefore the judgment of'the Court of Appeals should be, and is, affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.1






                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                                  
                                  
                                  
                                  
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-08527 on Form S-3, and in Registration Statement Nos. 33-40316, 33-45615, 
33-53260, 33-50815, 33-52039, 33-60915, 33-60921 and 333-28543 on Form S-8 of
IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated January 22, 1999 (February 23,
1999 as to Note 14), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of IPALCO
Enterprises, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.









DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Indianapolis, Indiana
February 25, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1423 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1423

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, as the ``Specialist 
                   Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 2011

  Mr. Cole (for himself, Mr. Boren, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Lucas, and Mr. 
  Lankford) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, as the ``Specialist 
                   Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST MICHEAL E. PHILLIPS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Specialist Micheal E. Phillips Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed February 11, 2015

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00231

- CV

____________ LINDA JACKSON AND TE RRY JACKSON , Appellant

V. CITY OF BAYTOWN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 2013

- 09168



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Exhibit F to The City of Baytown's Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion for Summary Ju dgment.2

The clerk of the 55th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of Exhibit F to The City of Baytown's Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion for Summary Judgment, on or before February 20, 2015

. The Clerk of
this court is dir ected to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of Exhibit F to The City of Baytown's Plea to the
Jurisdiction and Motion for Summary Judgment, to the clerk of the 55th District
Court.

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Krish Panu, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of @Road, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2004
/s/ Krish Panu
Krish Panu
**Exhibit No. 15.1**

Awareness Letter from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

October 30, 2006

Armstrong Holdings, Inc. 

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 

Re: Registration Statement No. 33-18996; 33-18997

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated October 30, 2006 related toour review of interim financial information of Armstrong Holdings, Inc. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), suchreport is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections7 and 11 of the Act. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
#### Morris MAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 03-5002.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 31, 2003.

Before LOURIE, BRYSON, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

The United States moves to summarily affirm the judgment of the Court of Feder*493al Claims that dismissed Morris May’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. May opposes. May also submits a motion requesting various relief.*

May filed a complaint seeking reinstatement of unemployment benefits that were originally issued to a man now deceased. The Court of Federal Claims stated that May claimed to be the personal representative of that man. The Court of Federal Claims also stated that the Ohio Unemployment Compensation Review Commission had denied May’s request for the unemployment benefits. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed May’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction, stating that its jurisdiction is limited to actions against the United States arising under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491. May appealed to this court.

The United States argues that the Court of Federal Claims’ judgment should be summarily affirmed. We agree. Summary disposition of a case “is appropriate, *inter alia,*when the position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of the appeal exists.” *Joshua v. United States,*17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed.Cir.1994). In the present case, it is clear that summary disposition is warranted. May’s complaint regarding the denial of unemployment benefits is clearly outside of the jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The United States’ motion for summary affirmance is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

 May requests reconsideration of this court’s October 31, 2002 order that rejected a different notice of appeal for filing and stated that "[a]dditional appeals, petitions, and documents submitted by May will be reviewed and, if jurisdiction is lacking, the clerk may refuse to file the documents.” May’s motion for reconsideration is denied.

This appeal was not rejected by the clerk, because this court has jurisdiction to review final judgments of the Court of Federal Claims.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: In the Matter of K. T. S.

Appellate case number: 01-18-0778-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-02717J

Trial court: 315th District Court of Harris County

This Court’s August 30, 2018 Order on Motion had granted the district clerk’s 

extension to file the clerk’s record until September 4, 2018, and set appellant’s brief due 

within 10 days of the filing of the records. On August 30, 2018, the clerk’s record was 

filed and on September 4, 2018, the reporter’s record was filed. No brief or extension has 

been timely filed by September 14, 2018.

Appeals in juvenile certification cases are to be brought to final disposition within 

180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed, so far as reasonably possible. See Order 

Accelerating Juvenile Certification Appeals and Requiring Juvenile Courts to Give Notice 

of the Right to an Immediate appeal, Misc. Docket No. 15-9156 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). The 

March 27, 2018 notice of appeal set a September 21, 2018 deadline. See id. at 3(a).

Accordingly, the Court sua sponte abates this appeal for the trial court to hold a 

hearing and appellant’s counsel, Gary M. Polland, may be required to show cause why he 

should not be relieved of his duties after a finding of good cause is rendered by the court 

on the record and, if so, to enter orders withdrawing counsel and appointing new counsel. 

See TEX. FAM.CODE ANN. § 56.01(d)(2), (3) (West 2017). Any hearing shall be conducted 

within 7 days of the date of this Order. The trial court clerk shall file supplemental clerk’s 

records containing the orders within 10 days of this Order.

If Gary M. Polland files an extension motion and appellant’s brief in this Court and 

a copy of such brief in the trial court, and his brief complies with Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 38.1, no later than 7 days from the date of this order, this Court may 

reconsider and withdraw this order and reinstate this appeal.

This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. This appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the supplemental 

clerk’s record complying with this Order is filed with this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley ________________________________

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: September 21, 2018
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 14, 2014.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-14-00621-CV

MALLORY YORK, Appellant

V.

MAKEATHA COOPER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF13-01004

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Brown 

Opinion by Justice Lang

The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By letter dated June 23, 2014, we informed 

appellant that the District Clerk had notified the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed 

appellant to file written verification that appellant had paid or made arrangements to pay for the 

clerk’s record or that appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We 

cautioned that if appellant did not filed the required documentation within ten days of the date of 

the letter, we might dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not provided the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the Court 

regarding the status of the clerk’s record or this appeal.
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 

42.3(b), (c).

140621F.P05

/Douglas S. Lang/

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MALLORY YORK, Appellant

No. 05-14-00621-CV V.

MAKEATHA COOPER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF13-01004.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang,

Justices Myers and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee MAKEATHA COOPER recover her costs of this appeal, 

if any, from appellant MALLORY YORK.

Judgment entered this 14th day of July, 2014.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hesperia Holding, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steve Chaussy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                           /s/ STEVE CHAUSSY
                           -----------------
                               Steve Chaussy
                               Chief Financial Officer
                               November 15, 2004
Exhibit 32.1


                       Wings & Things, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Linda L. Perry, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Wings &
Things, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

a.     the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter
       ended March 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

b.     the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Company.



Date: May 10, 2004
                                   /s/ Linda L. Perry
                                   ________________________________________
                                   Linda L. Perry
                                   Principal Executive and Financial Officer
#### Roy NEWBY et al., Appellants, v. Sillus WILSON et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 13, 1957.

■Isaac Turner, Hyden, for appellants.

A. E. Cornett, Hyden, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming the judgment awarding the land in dispute to the appellees. The value of the land does not exceed $1,600. We think the evidence supports the finding of the trial judge that the oral agreement *928between the appellants and Arthur Napier and Mabele Napier (the Napiers are not parties to this action) to purchase and sell real estate came within the Statute of Frauds. KRS 371.010. Either party could have rescinded the agreement. As the trial judge pointed out, the appellants as against *the*Napiers, are entitled *to*recover the amount they paid oh the property, less a reasonable rental value. The Wilsons were fully apprised of the dealings between the appellants and the Napiers.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

      ( print page 13718)    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has released for public comment an exposure draft of a proposed Technical Release titled                         *Omnibus Technical Release Amendments: Conforming Amendments to Technical Releases 10, 16, 20, 21.*                         Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the exposure draft.                    

# DATES:

Written comments are requested by April 15, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The exposure draft is available on the FASAB website at                         *https://www.fasab.gov/​documents-for-comment/​.*                         Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350. Comments should be sent to                         *fasab@fasab.gov*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

*Authority:*31 U.S.C. 3511(d); Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1001-1014.                    

Dated: February 15, 2024.

Monica R. Valentine,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2024-03662 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P