alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 21    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
The Subsidiaries of Commercial BancShares, Incorporated are:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
  Name of Company                                         State of Incorporation
  ---------------                                         ----------------------
<S>                                                       <C>
 . Commercial Banking and Trust Company                             West Virginia

 . Jackson County Bank                                              West Virginia

 . Farmers and Merchants Bank of Ritchie County                     West Virginia

 . The Dime Bank                                                             Ohio

 . Union Bank of Tyler County                                       West Virginia

 . The Community Bank                                               West Virginia

 . The Bank of Paden City                                           West Virginia

 . Hometown Insurance Agency, Inc. [Inactive]                       West Virginia
 
</TABLE>
#### Charles Bernard GREEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27265.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1955.

A. C. Chaney, Cleburne, for appellant.

Wesley Dice, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, six months in jail and a fine of $450.

Chief of Police Street testified that, in company with other officers and armed with a search warrant, he went to “a white frame building facing east on the next lot directly north of the Dairy Cream, which address of the Dairy Cream is 1015 N. Main St.” in the City of Cleburne; that the building was located within a used car lot; that the appellant was there, as was a bed and some clothes; that they searched the clothes and found four half-pints of whiskey. Street testified that they then attempted to search a green Buick automobile but could not open the trunk; that the appellant said that he had lost the key; that he told the appellant that they would have to gain entrance to the trunk and would have to take the Buick to a body shop for that purpose and suggested that they have it towed, but that the appellant replied, “Go ahead and drive it.”

Street testified further that some three week$ prior to the search the appellant had told him that the green Buick belonged to him and that the appellant exhibited to him title papers to the Buick made out in blank and a receipt for the dealer’s license which was on the Buick.

Officer Kimbrell stated that he drove the Buick to the body shop, that they gained admittance to the trunk by removing the back seat and there found a satchel containing 34 half-pints of whiskey.

E. C. Butler testified that he ran a used car lot at the location in question, that the appellant rented an apartment from him there, and that the whiskey was not his.

Appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in his own behalf.

*111Appellant objected to the search of the house and the automobile on the grounds that the premises were described in the warrant as a private dwelling and because the automobile was not described in the warrant.

A quotation from the warrant will, we think, best answer both objections, to-wit:

> “A certain private dwelling, located in Cleburne, Johnson County, Texas, described as (a) White frame building, used as used car lot office, located just North on the next lot, from the Dairy Cream, same being the next building North of 1015 North Main St., Cle-burne, Texas, facing East on said street. Said location being called Butler Car Lot. Also all automobiles, outhouses, garages, curtilages and appur-tinances thereto.”

There can be no merit to appellant’s claim that the search of the automobile was unauthorized because finally accomplished at the body shop some distance from the used car lot.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
KIK Technology International, Inc.
File No. 000-30071

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 -
              CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(Company)  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  October 31, 2005,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (Report),  I, William
M. Knooihuizen,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: December 13, 2005                           By: /s/ William M. Knooihuizen
      -----------------                              ---------------------------
                                                          William M. Knooihuizen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(Company)  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  October 31, 2005,  as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Kuldip C.
Baid, Chief Accounting  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,  adopted as pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


Date: December 13, 2005                          By: /s/ Kuldip C. Baid
      -----------------                              ---------------------------
                                                                  Kuldip C. Baid
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained by KIK
Technology  International,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,755-02

IN RE RICHARD CARL PEPPERS, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. A-42,639 IN THE 70TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM ECTOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that on August 20, 2019, he sent an application for a writ

of habeas corpus to Ector County and that his application has not been forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Ector County, shall forward Relator’s habeas application

to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Ector County, or forward a

copy of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting the date the State

received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); TEX.

R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this

order within thirty days from the date of this order.
2

Filed: September 23, 2020

Do not publish
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 24, 2012

h0917 

# Order

September 24, 2012

145180

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145180

COA: 308414

Genesee CC: 03

- 011359

- FH

JOBEY HENDERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 18, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is c onsidered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Destination Television, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Scott Venters, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: June 18, 2007

| /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
| Gordon Scott Venters,      President and Chief Executive Officer      (principal executive officer) and      Acting Chief Financial Officer      (principal financial officer and      principal accounting officer). |
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

PAUL W. WILLIAMS Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D23-2251 February 14, 2024 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Barbara Twine Thomas, Judge. Paul W. Williams, pro se. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. VILLANTI, LaROSE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Computer Software Innovations, Inc.
(the Company), each certify, pursuant to 18 USC § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Nancy K. HedrickNancy K. Hedrick Chief Executive
OfficerDate: May 15, 2007/s/ David B. DechantDavid B. Dechant Chief Financial
OfficerDate: May 15, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,731,930
<SECURITIES>                                 2,525,926
<RECEIVABLES>                                  331,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,589,030
<PP&E>                                      32,957,648
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,074,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          567,902
<BONDS>                                        314,464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  38,192,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,074,700
<SALES>                                      5,020,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,313,944
<CGS>                                        1,063,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,063,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,111,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,428,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,710,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,710,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,710,797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    42.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    42.43
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of
      I-trax, Inc. (the **“Company”**) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
      September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the **“Report”**), I, R. Dixon Thayer, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      R.
      Dixon
      Thayer


R.
      Dixon
      Thayer


Chief
      Executive Officer





November
      9, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000728389
<NAME>                        NATIONAL HOME HEALTH CARE
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                  AUG-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                           8,929,000
<SECURITIES>                       528,000
<RECEIVABLES>                    8,913,000
<ALLOWANCES>                      (414,000)
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                18,681,000
<PP&E>                             744,000
<DEPRECIATION>                    (425,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  24,421,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,393,000
<BONDS>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                             6,000
<OTHER-SE>                      21,498,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    24,421,000
<SALES>                         38,830,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                38,830,000
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   35,564,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                (1,950,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  5,216,000
<INCOME-TAX>                     1,859,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              3,357,000
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                     3,357,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
#### J. D. MURRAY v. Herbert GRIDER.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 31, 1957.

L. C. Lawrence, Jamestown, for appellant.

Leonard E. Wilson, Jamestown, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal by J. D. Murray from a judgment of the Russell Circuit Court, Hon. T. A. Wilson, Judge, dismissing his complaint against appellee, Herbert Grider, for $1,700 damages growing out of an accident on the highway between appellant’s taxicab and appellee’s farm tractor and trailer, which the complaint alleged was caused by appellee’s negligence. The answer denied negligence upon the part of appellee and by way of counterclaim he sought to recover $100 damages to his truck, which he averred was caused by appellant’s negligence.

A trial resulted in the jury finding both parties negligent and denying recovery to either. The judgment dismissed both the complaint and the counterclaim.

From reading the record and briefs, and examining the authorities cited in the briefs, we find no error prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights. Therefore, the motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
#### WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL *v.*THEODORA CASALE

(14315)

Foti, Heiman and Cretella, Js.

Argued December 13, 1995

decision released March 12, 1996

*935
      *Grant Fondo,*with whom, on the brief, were *Brendan T. Flynn,*and *Robert L. Hirtle,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Peter N. Buzaid,*assistant coiporation counsel, for the appellee (plaintiff).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00817-CV

Jesus CASTILLO and All Other Occupants,

Appellants

v.

Juan CANTU,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CVD-000010-L 1

Honorable Ben Morales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 21, 2009

DISMISSED

On November 3, 2008, appellant filed a document entitled “Defendant’s Motion to Withdraw

Notice of Appeal and Affidavit in Lieu of Supersedas [sic] Bond.” The motion states, “This court

has been dismissed defendant for lack of jurisdiction.” On November 17, 2008, this court issued an

order stating that it had made no determination with regard to our jurisdiction to consider this appeal

and ordered appellants to provide written clarification as to whether appellants were requesting a

voluntary dismissal of the appeal. See TEX.R.APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We subsequently ordered that we
04-08-00817-CV

-2-

would construe appellants’ motion as a request for a voluntary dismissal if appellants failed to

provide written clarification by December 22, 2008. No response was filed. Accordingly, we grant

appellants’ motion to withdraw their notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal. Costs of the appeal

are taxed against appellants.

PER CURIAM
#### Alfred HOOPER, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellees.

No. 31187.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 9, 1959.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Samuel H. Robertson, Jr., Wells Stewart, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Upon a trial before the court without a jury, appellant was convicted-of unlawfully carrying a pistol; the punishment, a fine of $150.

The testimony shows that the appellant while in possession of a pistol with four unspent shells in it walked up to a police officer standing on a public street in the city of Houston, told him that he had just shot a woman in the cafe and handed him the pistol.

Appellant testifying in his own behalf states that he carried the pistol from his home to a cafe located next door but not owned by him and later carried the pistol out on the street and gave it to an officer. He further testified that trouble arose between him and his wife and to prevent his wife from getting the pistol and shooting him with it he took it from his house to the cafe and that she followed him with an ice pick.

There are no formal or informal bills of exception.

The evidence is sufficient to warrant the trial judge’s conclusion that the appellant unlawfully carried a pistol as charged.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

11:30 a.m. EST, Wednesday, February 28, 2024.

# PLACE: 

CFTC headquarters office, Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Matters relating to the selection of a candidate to serve as the Inspector General of the Commission. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date,                               ( print page 12828)                            and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: February 15, 2024.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-03503 Filed 2-15-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P