alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

Press Release                                            Source: edaddywarbucks

Hesperia Holding Inc. Signs Media Agreement with edaddywarbucks
Thursday September 30, 1:04 pm ET

HESPERIA, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 23, 2004--Hesperia Holding Inc.
(OTCBB:HSPR - News) will acquire $2 million in media through an agreement with
edaddywarbucks to promote Hesperia's products through a massive regional and
national advertising campaign.

Hesperia Holding Inc., through its wholly owned subsidiary, Hesperia Truss Inc.,
designs, engineers and manufactures roof and floor trusses that serve both the
residential and commercial construction industry. Hesperia Truss Inc. was
founded in 1993 in Hesperia, California by Don Shimp and Mark Presgraves. The
company has since grown to annual revenue of $8.14 million in 2003 and continues
to grow in the first six months of 2004 with a 38% increase over the prior year.
Its market area includes the fast-growing High Desert Region and Inland Empire
areas of Southern California and Southern Nevada markets. Hesperia Holding Inc,
employs approximately 110 people on its five-acre facility in Hesperia,
California.


"We believe this first transaction of $2 million in advertising exposure through
edaddywarbucks will allow us to grow our company and help it reach its full
potential," said Hesperia Truss spokesman Fred Smith.


Edaddywarbucks, is a strategic marketing company that facilitates leverage and
barter arrangements with national media to build brand awareness and consumer
acceptance of publicly trade companies.


"I am excited to be involved with such a progressive company serving southern
California's and southern Nevada's booming construction industry," said Norman
Alvis, president and founder of Sacramento, California-based edaddywarbucks.


For more information please visit www.hesperiatrussinc.com or
www.edaddywarbucks.com.


The Private Securities Digitations Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor"
for forward-looking statements. Certain of the statements contained herein,
which are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements with respect to
events, the occurrence of which involve risks and uncertainties. These
forward-looking statements may be impacted, either positively or negatively, by
various factors. Information concerning potential factors could affect the
Company is detailed from time to time in the Company's reports filed with the
Securities and Exchanges Commission.



Contact:
     Round 2 INC.
     Andrew Austin, 619-334-8521
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1688 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1688

   To provide for pay parity for civilian employees serving at joint 
                        military installations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2011

  Mr. Runyan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for pay parity for civilian employees serving at joint 
                        military installations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``BRAC Wage Locality Pay Parity Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. PAY PARITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EMPLOYEES EMPLOYED AT 
              JOINT BASES.

    (a) Definitions.--For purposes of this section--
            (1) the term ``pay locality'' or ``locality'' has the 
        meaning given that term by section 5302 of title 5, United 
        States Code; and
            (2) the term ``locality pay'' refers to any amount payable 
        under section 5304 or 5304a of title 5, United States Code.
    (b) Pay Parity at Joint Bases.--Whenever 2 or more military 
installations are reorganized or otherwise associated as a single joint 
military installation, but the constituent installations are not all 
located within the same pay locality, all employees of the respective 
installations constituting the joint installation (who are otherwise 
entitled to locality pay) shall receive locality pay at a uniform 
percentage equal to the percentage which is payable with respect to the 
locality which includes the constituent installation then receiving the 
highest locality pay (expressed as a percentage).
    (c) Regulations.--The Office of Personnel Management shall 
prescribe regulations to carry out this section.
    (d) Effective Date; Applicability.--
            (1) Effective date.--This section shall be effective with 
        respect to pay periods beginning on or after such date (not 
        later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act) as 
        the Secretary of Defense shall determine in consultation with 
        the Office of Personnel Management.
            (2) Applicability.--This section shall apply to joint 
        military installations, whether so constituted before, on, or 
        after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 151 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 151

          To provide greater health care freedom for seniors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 
    and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To provide greater health care freedom for seniors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Seniors' Health Care Freedom Act of 
2010''.

SEC. 2. FACILITATING THE USE OF PRIVATE CONTRACTS UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1802(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395a(b)) is 
amended by striking paragraph (3) and by redesignating paragraphs (4) 
and (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively.

SEC. 3. NO ELIGIBILITY CONDITION BASED ON REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE IN A 
              GOVERNMENT PROGRAM.

    No persons otherwise eligible for old-age benefits under Social 
Security shall be denied such benefits because of their voluntary 
refusal to participate in any part of the Medicare program.
                                 <all>
```
### ^-O.^o% \p,^0S 0^\\o\ <oVisVvova „ RECEIVED /M 

### COURTOFCRimmAPPBALS W 15 2015 ^be?Acosia9C/erl* 

### My^ A"B>-:aa\5 ^V^Vv)^ CY>ec^ O^ S>^S\ S-Ae>* \VW-oV O*- AyVA Wv>fy\ *e>vjc.V> V^t=v*2» \>eevi ^-Ne^ -c=y-_^ «c e.ee->-ve^,.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**EDWARD DUNPHY,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 361 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Al lowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
AFS-11-391-E 

August 10, 2011 

 Exemption No. 32827 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0770 

Mr. Don Bintz 

Unmanned Systems, Inc. 

2709 Cyrano Avenue 

Henderson, NV 89052 

Dear Mr. Bintz: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated July 18, 2011 you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Unmanned Systems, Inc. (USI), for an exemption from §§ 91.9(b)(2) and 91.203(a) 

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption will allow USI to 

operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that does not carry and display the aircraft’s 

airworthiness, certification, and registration documents required under part 91. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to USI. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 8607 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that it is unnecessary to carry and display the airworthiness, certification, and 

registration documents in UASs for the operation described by the petitioner. The original 

intent of the subject regulations was to display the airworthiness and registration documents 

so they would be easily available to the FAA inspectors and passengers. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No 8607; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 8607 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Unmanned Systems, Inc., an exemption from 

14 CFR §§ 91.9(b)(2) and 91.203(a) and (b) to the extent necessary to allow USI to operate a 

UAS that does not carry and display the aircraft’s airworthiness, certification, and registration 

documents required under part 91, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. The documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the pilot in 

command of the UAS anytime the aircraft is operating. 

2. Those documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be made available 

within 10 days to any FAA, U.S. Department of Defense, or law enforcement 

official. 

3. This exemption is not valid for operations outside the United States. 

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We have issued our report dated March 4, 2003, accompanyingthe consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said report in the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-10769, 33-15322, 33-18696, 33-64582, 333-55933, 333-55941 and 333-52876). 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

San Jose, California 

March 4, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CATUITY INC.


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Catuity, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael V. Howe,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: 11/14/02
      --------
                                           /s/ Michael V. Howe
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael V. Howe
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer








                                                                              20
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12838-12839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than March 6, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Spaniel, Senior 
Vice President) 10 Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106-
1521. Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c7a4a8aaaaa2a9b3b4e9a6b7b7abaea4a6b3aea8a9b487b7afaeabe9a1b5a5e9a8b5a0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cfaca0a2a2aaa1bbbce1aebfbfa3a6acaebba6a0a1bc8fbfa7a6a3e1a9bdade1a0bda8">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Castle Creek Capital Partners VIII, LP, San Diego, California; 
to acquire voting shares of Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc., 
Charlottesville, Virginia, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares 
of Blue Ridge Bank, National Association, Martinsville, Virginia.


[[Page 12839]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Erin Cayce,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-03397 Filed 2-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Amend to Statement of designations







EXHIBIT 4.1

 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

 

OF

 

STATEMENT OF DESIGNATIONS ESTABLISHING

$6.75 CONVERTIBLE EXCHANGEABLE PREFERRED STOCK

    

  ICO, Inc., a Texas corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Texas Business Corporation Act (the “TBCA”),

    

    DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

    

   FIRST: That the Board of Directors of said corporation, at a meeting of its members on June 28, 2004, duly called, and at which at least a quorum was present, adopted a resolution proposing and declaring advisable the following amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation:

    


	     RESOLVED, that in the judgment of the Board of Directors, it is deemed advisable to amend Section 5(c) of the Statement of Designations Establishing $6.75 Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock (the “Statement of Designations”) of the Company so that it will be and read in its entirety as follows:
	 
	     (c) Whenever the voting right described in subsection (a) above shall have vested in the holders of the Preferred Stock, the right may be exercised (i) at a special meeting of the holders of the Preferred Stock called as hereafter provided, (ii) at any annual meeting of the shareholders held for the purpose of electing directors or (iii) without a meeting, without prior notice, and without a vote, if a consent or consents in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holder or holders of the Preferred Stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take such action at a meeting at which all holders of Preferred Stock entitled to vote on the action were present and voted.



     

    SECOND: That in lieu of a meeting, a holder of $6.75 Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock (the “Preferred Stock”) holding more than two-thirds of the outstanding Preferred Stock has given written consent to said amendment in accordance with the provisions of Section 4(a) of the Statement of Designations and Article 9.10 of the TBCA.

 

    THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted, effective June 28, 2004, in accordance with the provisions of Part Four of the TBCA and the said corporation’s constituent documents.

   

	 
	 	 	 
	



	 



 
 

 

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ICO, Inc. has caused this certificate to be signed by its Chief Financial Officer, and attested by its General Counsel and Secretary, this 1st day of July, 2004. 



 


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
By: 
	
 
	
/s/ Jon C. Biro

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	





	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Name: 
	
 
	
Jon C. Biro

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Title: 
	
 
	
Chief Financial Officer

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
ATTEST:
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Charlotte Fischer
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	




	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Name:
	
Charlotte Fischer
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Title:
	
General Counsel and Secretary
#### Ferman PIERCE v. STATE.

No. 29033.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1957.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction, on a plea of guilty before the court, is for the possession of whisky for the purpose of sale in a dry area, with a prior conviction alleged for enhancement; the punishment, ten days in jail and a fine of $200.

Accompanying the record is the affidavit of appellant requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
1 John T. Boyd, Chief Ju stice (Re t.), Seven th Court of Appeal s, sittin g by assi gnment.

Tex. Gov ’t Code A nn. §75.0 02(a)(1) (Vernon S upp. 200 4). NO. 07-02-0511-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL E FEBRUARY 5, 2004

______________________________ DULCES NOMBRES BALDERRAMA A KA DULCES N. BALDERRAMA, APPEL LANT

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLE E

_________________________________ FROM THE 121 ST DISTRICT COURT OF TERRY COUNTY; NO. 4844; HON. KELLY G. MOORE, PRESIDING

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J. 1
MEMORAND UM OPINION Presenting one issue which, he posits, requires reversal, appe llant Dulces Nombres Balderra ma challenges his conviction of felony grade driving while intoxi cated. Appellant pled guilty to the offense, but requested the jury to assess his pun ishment. After hearing2

evidence, the jury assessed his punishment at eight years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Department of Criminal Justice. In his sole issue, appellant contends the trial court erred in ruling that a defense witness coul d not testify that he (appellant) had been sentenced to four years penal confinement because of a revocation of prob ation in Andrews County heretofore granted him. Disagreeing that reversal is required, we affirm the trial court’s j udgment.
In relevant part, the record shows the following colloq u y that too k place in the absence of the jury:
The Court: Okay. I have Shawn Boc kleman .

. . who’s going to be the Defense’s next witness. And Mr. Bockleman, I just want you to know that s inc e -- it’s my

understa nding on represen tation fro m Mr. Martin ez that Mr. Balderrama’s probation in An drews County was revoked by order of the judge and thathe’s sentenced to serve four years in prison, but that ha s been appealed and that Mr. Balderrama is out on bond on that matter. Under the lawand for t he purpo ses of thi s case th en it’s j ust a s if there had been no revokation [sic]. And so I’ve ruled in this case that the fact that a revokation [sic] order has been entered by thejudge or that he’s been sentenced to any penitentiary time would not be mentioned since i t’s on appeal. Okay? The Witness: Okay The Cour

t: I think that shou ld cover the circu mstances.
The recor

d does not show an y objecti on to theruling of the cour t.
Rule 33.1 of the Texas Rules of Appell ate Procedure specifically requires tha t to preserve a complaint for appellate review, t he complaining party must make a “timely request, objection, or

motion” w ith suffi cient spe cificity to make the trial court aware of the complain t. See also Purtell v. State , 761 S.W.2d 360, 365-66 ( Tex. Crim. Ap p. 1988), cert.3

denied , 490 U.S. 1059, 10 9 S.Ct. 19 72, 104 L .Ed.2d 44 1 (1989); Zillen der v . State , 55 7 S.W.2d 51 5, 517 (T ex. Crim . App. 19 77).
Because of the lack of a trial objection , th ere is nothing pre served fo r appell ate review. Accordingly, appellant’sissue does not present reversible error, and it is ove rruled. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
John T. Boyd Senior Justice Do not publish.
Exhibit 32.2(*)
   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael T. Everett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
  Date: November 8, 2004
 
 
  /s/ MICHAEL T. EVERETT
 Michael T. Everett
 Chief Financial Officer
  
   
   
   _____________________________
   (*) In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Managements Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.2 is deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
   
   
   
   
   Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2004   
  Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2004