alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. AP-76,234 & AP-76,235

EX PARTE JOHN EDISON LASHER, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. CM-01-192-1 AND CM-01-193-1

IN THE 278 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM LEON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to one charge

of aggravated sexual assault of a child, and one charge of indecency with a child, and originally

received deferred adjudication community supervision. His guilt was later adjudicated, and he was

sentenced to life imprisonment for the aggravated sexual assault, and ten years’ imprisonment for

the indecency charge.
2

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal through no fault of his own. His

trial counsel filed a motion to withdraw, and requested that appellate counsel be appointed. The trial

court granted the motion and appointed appellate counsel, but appellate counsel was not notified of

the appointment until the time for filing a notice of appeal had expired. The Tenth Court of Appeals

dismissed Applicant’s appeals as untimely. Lasher v. State, Nos. 10-07-00081-CR & 10-07-00082-

CR (Tex. App. – Waco, May 30, 2007). 

The trial court has determined that Applicant was denied the assistance of counsel during the

period for filing a notice of appeal, through no fault of his own. We find that Applicant did not have

any assistance of counsel during the time for filing a notice of appeal, and therefore he is entitled to

the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the sentences imposed after adjudication of guilt in

Cause Nos. CM-01-192-1 and CM-01-193-1 from the 278th Judicial District Court of Leon County.

Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he

may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be calculated

as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold

that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written

notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: September 30, 2009

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC
MERCANTILE BANCORP

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the
Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which
this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ RAYMOND E. DELLERBA                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|                       |  |  |  | Raymond E. Dellerba, President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                 
|                       |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.20
 OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT OSI PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Units.
 2. Vesting and Forfeiture.
 3. Settlement of Restricted Stock Units.




---



##### 



4. Restriction on Transferability
 5. Securities Laws
 6. Withholding of Applicable Taxes.
 7. Subject to Terms of Plan.
 8. No Rights as Stockholder.
 -2-




---



##### 



9. Continued Employment or Service.
 10. Binding Effect
 11. Governing Law.
 12. Counterparts
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 OSI PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.Name:Title:EMPLOYEE[EMPLOYEE]Date: -3-
**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement Nos. 333-127717 and 333-136728 on Form S-8 and 333-140246 on Form S-3 of our report dated September 28, 2007, with respect to
      the consolidated balance sheets of IsoRay, Inc. and Subsidiary as of June 30,
      2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
      in
      shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report
      appears in the Form 10-KSB filing for IsoRay, Inc. to be filed on September
      28,
      2007.





/s/
      DeCoria, Maichel & Teague, P.S.





Spokane,
      Washington


September
      28, 2007
### 149JO-13-IlJ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCES ROUTlNG "'''BO'- Federal Aviation Administration 

## Itg-T' LNLTI"L!>'5I{; 14CFR Part 39 

## 0551 [Docket No. FAA-2010-****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-202-AD; Amendmen 

## \Go'? 33 ;J..oJC>- 

## 13- ()~ 39-*****; AD 20**-**-**] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Fakker Model F.27 Mark 500 and 600 Airplanes [lATE 

# JI" /6 OVT'NQ SI'''Il()I. 

## :>, (11;:;'" AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule; request for comments. 

## -7

-IUO ~OllrING

'I'M L 

# RO:%tJ~~ 

# '7rh"'--
I>A1'1! 

# 617/(D
"OUTl~'G SYMOOI.



## - /0/ AFokker 50 operator reported an overextended MLG sliding member after landing. During subsequent investigation itwas found that an end stop had unscrewed itselfto acertain extent. This caused the MLG torque links to move into an overcentre position against the MLG sliding member. Investigation learned that there was no lockwiring present on the two lockbolts, which hold the end stop, This condition, ifnot corrected, could lead to structura! damage ofthe main gear and loss ofcontrol ofthe aeroplanes during the landing roll. above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl)

This AD requires actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: originated by anaviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct anunsate SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products liste

# IN2~~
D,\"I'I' 

## C;/-YO/IO

the MeAl.
#### W. G. STEVENS, Appellant, v. Alec WILSON, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Sept. 30, 1955.

S. Jewell Rice, Scott Reed, Lexington, for appellant.

George R. Smith, Stanley M. Saunier, Jr., Lexington, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is for $1,371 in favor of the defendant on a counterclaim arising from an automobile accident. The trial and appeal have been practiced under the Civil Code. The bill of exceptions has heretofore been stricken; hence, there is left for this court’s consideration only the question of whether the pleadings are sufficient to support the judgment. They are.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment stands affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          747,442
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    55,214
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                810,946
<PP&E>                                          247,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                   62,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,155,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           242,011
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         16,675
<OTHER-SE>                                      897,252
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,155,938
<SALES>                                          36,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 36,990
<CGS>                                           100,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   (63,963)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              1,007,371
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (1,071,334)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               40,138
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,031,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,031,196)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,031,196)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>
#### Hattie Mae WILBURN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28897.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 20, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted, under two counts of the information, of separate offenses of selling beer in a dry area and her punishment was assessed at fines in the total amount of $200.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
exhibit 4.4






EXHIBIT 4.4

STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

       THIS STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT is made to
be effective as of May 8, 2003, between SulphCo, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), and Patrick E. Lacy (the "Optionee").

       THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1.     Option Grant.    The Company hereby
grants to the Optionee an option (the "Option") to purchase the number of
shares of the Company's common stock (the "Shares"), for an exercise
price per share (the "Option Price") and based upon a Grant Date, all as
set forth below:


  	
 	

 

	

Shares under option: 100,000


	
 	

 

	

Option Price per Share: $0.35


	
 	

 

	

Grant Date: May 8, 2003


	
 	

 

	

Expiry Date: May 8, 2006








       The Option granted hereunder is a nonstatutory or nonqualified option for tax
purposes.

2.     Stockholder Rights.    No rights or
privileges of a stockholder in the Company are conferred by reason of the
granting of the Option.  Optionee will not become a stockholder in the Company
with respect to the Shares unless and until the Option has been properly
exercised and the Option Price fully paid as to the portion of the Option
exercised.

3.     Termination.  This Option will expire,
unless previously exercised in full, on the Expiry Date, May 8, 2006.


4.     S-8 Registration Statement/Exercise.    Upon
the Optionee's request, the Company will agree to register the Shares on a Form
S-8 registration statement and shall keep the registration statement in effect.
The Company agrees to reasonably cooperate in connection with Optionee's
cashless exercise of the Option.

5.     Miscellaneous.    This Agreement sets
forth the complete agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter
hereof, superseding all prior agreements, negotiations and understandings.  This
Agreement will be governed by the substantive law of the State of Nevada, and
may be executed in counterparts.

The parties hereby have entered into this Agreement as of the date set forth
above.


  	
 	
 	
 	
 
	
 	

 

	

"Company"

	
 
	
 	
 	
 	
 
	
 	

 

	

By:_________________________

	
 
	
 	

 

	

Title:________________________

	
 
	
 	
 
	
 	
 
	
 	

 

	

"Optionee"

	
 
	
 	
 	
 	
 
	
 	
 	
 	
 
	
 	

 

	

Patrick E. Lacy

	
 







  6
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Computer Software Innovations, Inc. (the
Company), each certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Nancy K. HedrickNancy K. HedrickChief Executive OfficerDate: December 8, 2005/s/ David B. DechantDavid B. DechantChief Financial OfficerDate: December 8, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, Bruce E. Thomas, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of BOE Financial Services of Virginia, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

The Coast Distribution System, Inc.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2007,

as Amended on Form 10-K/A

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Annual Report
on Form 10-K, of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and as amended by this Amendment on Form
10-K/A (the Annual Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Annual Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 28, 2008



/s/ JAMES MUSBBACHJames Musbach President and Chief Executive OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and will be retained by The Coast Distribution System,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (a)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 11th day of May, 2004.


                                                  /s/  Albert R. Rietheimer
                                                  -------------------------
                                                       Albert R. Rietheimer
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                              and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp
Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03666]



[[Page 13719]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS24-05]


Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Adoption of Revised Grants 
Handbook

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of adoption of Revised Grants Handbook.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) of the Federal Financial 
Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) is providing notice of its 
adoption of the Revised Grants Handbook (Handbook). The Handbook is the 
official repository of the policies and procedures for the 
administration of grants made by the ASC as authorized by Title XI of 
the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 
1989, as amended (Title XI). The ASC adopted the Handbook in the open 
session ASC Special Meeting held January 17, 2024. This Handbook 
supersedes the Handbook that the ASC adopted on December 12, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rae Frederique, Grants Director, at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83f1e6e4e6e2ede6c3e2f0e0ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="deacbbb9bbbfb0bb9ebfadbdf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>, ASC, 1325 G Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 
20005.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The ASC is authorized to grant funds to the 
Appraisal Foundation under Title XI, section 1109(b)(4). The ASC may 
``make grants in such amounts as it deems appropriate to the Appraisal 
Foundation, to help defray those costs of the foundation relating to 
the activities of its Appraisal Standards and Appraiser Qualification 
Boards.'' \1\ The ASC is also authorized to grant funds to State 
appraiser certifying and licensing agencies under Title XI section 1109 
(b)(5), which provides that the ASC may ``make grants to State 
appraiser certifying and licensing agencies, in accordance with 
policies to be developed by the [ASC], to support the efforts of such 
agencies to comply with [Title XI] . . . .'' \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Title XI Sec.  1109 (b)(4), 12 U.S.C. 3338(b)(4).
    \2\ Title XI Sec.  1109 (b)(5), 12 U.S.C. 3338(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Handbook as adopted by the ASC is available to the public and 
can be found at: https://www.asc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/2024.01.17%20ASC%20Handbook%20Ver.2.pdf on the ASC's website 
(www.asc.gov).
* * * * *

    By the Appraisal Subcommittee.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-03666 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>