alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF**


**THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of I-trax, Inc. (the **“Company”** )
      on Form
      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the **“Report”** ),
      I, R.
      Dixon Thayer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/
      R.
      Dixon Thayer


R.
      Dixon
      Thayer


Chief
      Executive Officer





August
      14, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

p0129 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139117 & (17) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139117 

 COA: 290955 

St. Joseph CC: 01-010602-FC 

JERRAD LEE KOLLER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of 

establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
### 1/2 

## EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

AD No : 2006-0068

Date: 24 March 2006

No person may operate an aircraft to which an Airworthi ness Directive applies, except in accordance with the requirements of that Airworthiness Directive unless otherwi se agreed with the Authority of the State of Registry. Type Approval Holder’s Name :

TURBOMECA 

### Type/Model designation(s) :

ARRIEL 1 Series

TCDS Number : France DGAC M5

Foreign AD : None

Supersedure : None



### ATA 72 Engine - Fuel leaks on the start electro valve - Inspection

Manufacturer: TURBOMECA

Applicability: Arriel 1 Series

Reason: In operation, fuel leaks at the leve l of start electro valve fuel coupling were observed. A lack of power or an uncommanded in-flight shutdown may result from these fuel leaks.
Effective Date: 7 April 2006

Compliance: Before 01 August 2006, contro l the proper assembly and the lack of looseness on the tee coupling on the start electro valve according to Service Bulletin TURBOMECA N° A292 73 0251.
Ref. Publications: Service Bulletin TURBOMECA N° A292 73 0251 Update No.2 or later approved revisions.

Remarks : 1. If requested and appropriately su bstantiated the responsible EASA manager for the related product has the authority to accept Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) for this AD. 2. This AD was posted as PAD 06-041 for consultation on 13 February

2006 with a comment period until 08 March 2006. The Comment Response Document can be found at http://www.easa.eu.int/home/aw_dir_en_html

### 2/2 3. Enquiries regarding this PAD should be addressed to Mr. M. Capaccio, AD Focal Point, Certification Directorate, EASA. E-mail: ADs@easa.eu.int
4

. For any questions concerning the technical content of the requirements in this AD, please contact TURBOMECA (Ph : +33 (0)5 59 12 50 00; Fax : +33 (0)5 59 53 15 12)
Order entered August 21, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00773-CV

CHARLES J. PATERNOSTRO, Appellant

V.

REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 59th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-18-1113

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated July 26, 2019, we 

informed appellant the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s record had not been filed 

because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification showing the 

reporter’s record had been requested and that appellant had paid for or made arrangements to pay 

for the record or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned 

appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the 

appeal being ordered submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not 

provided the required documentation nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the 
status of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal submitted without a 

reporter’s record. 

Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Frank C. MOORE, Appellant, v. Ernest RADKE et al., Appellees.

No. 13091.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Oct. 10, 1956.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 7, 1956.

■ Cole & Rhodes, Port Lavaca, for appellant.

. Jack Fields, Port Lavaca, Guittard & Henderson, Victoria, for appellees.

NORVELL, Justice.

In our opinion appellees’ '■ first counterpoint controls the disposition of this appeal. The controversy related to a disputed 25 foot roadway running along the east side of the Olivia Townsite in Calhoun County, Texas.. It .appears .that'appellant,. Frank C. Moore, who owned certain lots and blocks in the east portion of the town subdivision, made application to the Commissioners’ Court of Calhoun County, Texas, to cancel certain roadways or streets appearing on the subdivision plat. The original plat showed a 25 foot roadway along the easternmost boundary line of the subdivision. In connection with his application, Moore submitted a plat which likewise showed this 25 foot roadway and contained a statement sworn to by Moore, that he, as “sole owner of the Blocks hereon cancelled and re-subdivided, do hereby dedicate this plat to the public.” On April 13, 1953, the Commissioners’ Court granted Moore’s application and the Moore plat was accordingly filed for record. The order specifically describes the streets closed and vacated. A number of such streets abut on the 25 foot roadway above mentioned and are described so as to extend only to the western limits of the 25 foot way. No contention is made that this application or order closing certain streets effected a closure of the 25 foot rpad, Moore con-tenéis, however, that this way had been lost by non-user and he had acquired title thereto by adverse possession. Art. 6703a, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.Stats. We agree with appellees’ proposition that the 1953 *906proceedings' ¿mounted to a re-dedic'ation of the disputed roadway. The plat showed a dedication and delineated the roadway thereon, and the order of the Commissioners’ Court does not effect a closure or abandonment thereof. The trial court properly refused to grant an injunction restraining the Commissioners’ Court -from using and maintaining the way and the order appealed’ from is accordingly affirmed.
#### Ex parte Edsel WAGGONER.

No. 27654.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1955.

Raymond E. Ehrlich, Phárr, -for appellant.

Dave Horger, Jr., First Asst. Dist. Atty., Edinburg, Leon Douglas,- .State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. •:

MORRISON, Presiding Judge:

This- is a companion' casé to Ex parte Melton, Tex.Cr.App., 279 S.W.2d 362. The issues presented in the .two cases are identical, and our disposition of the Melton case is here controlling.

The relief prayed for is denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Diamond Triumph Auto
Glass, Inc.(the "Company") hereby certifies that:

         (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
     the six months ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.



Dated: August 14, 2003                      /s/ Michael A. Sumsky
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                     Michael A. Sumsky
                                                     Chief Financial Officer




         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
         Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for
         purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
         amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
         the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless
         of any general incorporation language in such filing.
CONSENT
      OF


INDEPENDENT
      REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-1 (No. 333-121563) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-133001, 333-70838 and 333-49396)
      of
      Communication Intelligence Corporation and its subsidiary of our report dated
      March 22, 2007 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
      explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue as a going
      concern), which appears on page F-1 of this annual report on Form 10-K for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2006.












GHP
      HORWATH, P.C.




Denver,
      Colorado


March
      22,
      2007
# Úradný vestník L 66/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0790 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | L 66 |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Právne predpisy | Ročník 618. marca 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0790

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

L 66

Slovenské vydanie

Právne predpisy

Ročník 618. marca 2018

---

| Obsah | | Korigendá | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Korigendum k nariadeniu Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2018/302 z 28. februára 2018 o riešení neodôvodneného geografického blokovania a iných foriem diskriminácie z dôvodu štátnej príslušnosti, miesta bydliska alebo sídla zákazníkov na vnútornom trhu, ktorým sa menia nariadenia (ES) č. 2006/2004 a (EÚ) 2017/2394 a smernica 2009/22/ES ( Ú. v. EÚ L 60 I, 2.3.2018 ) | 1 |

Obsah

Korigendá

Strana

*

Korigendum k nariadeniu Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2018/302 z 28. februára 2018 o riešení neodôvodneného geografického blokovania a iných foriem diskriminácie z dôvodu štátnej príslušnosti, miesta bydliska alebo sídla zákazníkov na vnútornom trhu, ktorým sa menia nariadenia (ES) č. 2006/2004 a (EÚ) 2017/2394 a smernica 2009/22/ES ( Ú. v. EÚ L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

( Ú. v. EÚ L 60 I, 2.3.2018 )

1

| SK | Akty, ktoré sú vytlačené obyčajným písmom, sa týkajú každodennej organizácie poľnohospodárskych záležitostí a sú spravidla platné len obmedzenú dobu.
  Názvy všetkých ostatných aktov sú vytlačené tučným písmom a je pred nimi hviezdička. |
| --- | --- |

SK

Akty, ktoré sú vytlačené obyčajným písmom, sa týkajú každodennej organizácie poľnohospodárskych záležitostí a sú spravidla platné len obmedzenú dobu.

Názvy všetkých ostatných aktov sú vytlačené tučným písmom a je pred nimi hviezdička.

---

Korigendá

| 8.3.2018 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | L 66/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2018

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

L 66/1

---

Korigendum k nariadeniu Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (EÚ) 2018/302 z 28. februára 2018 o riešení neodôvodneného geografického blokovania a iných foriem diskriminácie z dôvodu štátnej príslušnosti, miesta bydliska alebo sídla zákazníkov na vnútornom trhu, ktorým sa menia nariadenia (ES) č. 2006/2004 a (EÚ) 2017/2394 a smernica 2009/22/ES

(
  Úradný vestník Európskej únie L 60 I z 2. marca 2018
  )

Na strane 14 v podpise:

namiesto:

„
  Za Európsky parlament

predsedníčka

L. PAVLOVA

Za Radu

predseda

A. TAJANI
  “.

má byť:

„
  Za Európsky parlament

predseda

A. TAJANI

Za Radu

predsedníčka

L. PAVLOVA
  “.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Paul F. Walsh, the Chief Executive Officer, of eFunds
Corporation (the Company), and Thomas S. Liston, the Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certifies that, to
the best of their knowledge:

(i) the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of the Company (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Dated: August 14, 2003 |  |                                         
|                       |  |                                         
|                       |  | /s/ Paul F. Walsh                       
|                       |  |                                         
|                       |  | Paul F. Walsh
Chief Executive Officer   
|                       |  |                                         
|                       |  | /s/ Thomas S. Liston                    
|                       |  |                                         
|                       |  | Thomas S. Liston
Chief Financial Officer
#### CAROLINA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Roy GROSS et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 11, 1957.

Craft & Stanfill, Hazard, for appellant.

A. E. Cornett, Hyden, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment of $764.06 awarded appellees, Roy Gross and Owen Sizemore, against appel*926lant, Carolina Casualty Insurance Company. The judgment was dated December 15, 1955, and appellant filed in the Leslie Circuit Court a notice of appeal signifying its intention to appeal from this judgment.

Thereafter, on January 16, 1956, after due notice, appellant moved, pursuant to Cr. 60.02, to set aside the judgment on the ground that it was entered at a trial held without notice to appellant, although the latter had seasonably filed answer to the complaint wherein it traversed certain allegations and averred certain defenses to the claim asserted.

An order was entered on February 4, 1956, overruling the motion. Carolina Casualty Insurance Company has moved for an appeal from this order.

This appeal will not lie, because appellant failed to file in circuit court a notice of appeal from the order dated February 4, 1956, as required by Cr. 73.02(2). The notice of appeal from the judgment entered December 15, 1955, does not extend to and embrace the later order.

Wherefore, the motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 31(a)**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)**
I, Gregory B. Kalush, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Interphase Corporation(the “Company”);
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company andwe have:
   (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
   (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
   (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting;and
 5. The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the Company’s Boardof Directors:
   (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and
   (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: March 23, 2004 Signature: /s/ Gregory B. Kalush      Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Paving Stone
Corporation  (the  "Company")  for  the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"),  I,  Jace  Simmons,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.

                                                 /s/ Jace Simmons
                                                 -------------------
                                                 Jace  Simmons
                                                 Chief  Financial  Officer
                                                 November  12,  2003
EXHIBIT
31.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Andrew
Prague, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of
Presidential Associates I Limited Partnership;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this  report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:       April
15,
2008                                                                                        /s/ Andrew
Prague


Andrew
Prague


Chief Financial
Officer