alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40588 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAUL DELEON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-95-CR-24-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 14, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Raul DeLeon appeals the denial of his pretrial motion to suppress evidence seized by State Trooper Oscar Cruz during an investigatory traffic stop. DeLeon contends t hat Cruz had no objective reason to stop him because, under Texas law, the display of a partially torn temporary "buyer’s" license tag is not illegal and does not give rise to a reasonable suspicion that he was in violation of any law. Our review of the record and the arguments and authoritiesNo. 95-40588 - 2 - convince us that the district court committed no reversible error. Cruz was justified in stopping DeLeon to investigate the validity of his temporary license tag. See Green v. State , 866 S.W.2d 701, 703 (Tex. Ct. App. 1993); Kennedy v. State , 847 S.W.2d 635, 636 (Tex. Ct. App. 1993). DeLeon’s arguments that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because his detention subsequent to the initial investigation exceeded the scope and purpose of the initial stop and that he did not give voluntary consent to the search do not show that the district court committed plain error. United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993)), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995); United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). AFFIRMED.
#### Wade Travis HARDWICK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28093.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 22, 1956.

*659No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Doug'las, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. .

PER CURIAM.

Drunken driving is the offense; the punishment, three days’ confinement in jail and a fine of $50.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of - exception." All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment'is affirmed.
Table of Contents



Exhibit 10.1



Certification of
Chief Executive Officer
                                    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






    
In
connection with the Annual Report of Banco Bradesco S.A (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Márcio Artur Laurelli Cypriano, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   



	  (1)  	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934;           and







	  (2)  	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial           condition and results of operations of the Company.








	 	/s/ Márcio Artur Laurelli Cypriano

	 	Márcio Artur Laurelli Cypriano
Chief Executive Officer
Dated: June 30, 2004








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting  the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Banco Bradesco S.A. and will be retained by Banco Bradesco S.A. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMG Oil Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2003.

| | BY: | /s/ Michael Hart
Michael Hart, 
Principal Executive Officer and 
Principal Financial Officer
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Lathern DORSETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28147.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Upon his plea of guilty to the felony offense of drunken driving, appellant’s punishment was assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

Notwithstanding the fact that the trial court suspended the execution of sentence and placed appellant upon probation, notice of appeal to this court was given by the appellant.

The right of a probationer to appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a review of the trial and conviction is expressly authorized by art. 781b, Vernon’s Ann.C.C. P. § 5.

The record before us is without bills of exception or a statement of facts.

The indictment charges the offense for which appellant was convicted. ‘ 1 •

No reversible error appearing, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2142 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2142

 To provide for the inclusion of certain counties in North Carolina in 
    certain metropolitan statistical areas, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 1996

 Mr. Faircloth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the inclusion of certain counties in North Carolina in 
    certain metropolitan statistical areas, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN NORTH CAROLINA COUNTIES IN METROPOLITAN 
              STATISTICAL AREAS.

    The following counties shall be included in the following 
metropolitan statistical areas:
            (1) Harnett County, North Carolina, in the Wake, North 
        Carolina, metropolitan statistical area.
            (2) Henderson County, North Carolina, in the Asheville, 
        North Carolina, metropolitan statistical area.
                                 <all>
```
#### W. E. TAYLOR, Appellant, v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 3428.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Sept. 21, 1956.

Richey, Sheehy & Reeling, Waco, for appellant.

Ñaman, Howell & Smith, Waco, John K. Meyer, Houston, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This case is before the court on ap-pellee’s motion to affirm on certificate because of the failure of the appellant to file the transcript within the time prescribed.

Notice of appeal was given and appeal bond filed on May 15, 1956, but no transcript has been brought forward to this court in the case, and time for the filing of such has expired.

Under Rule 387 Texas Rules of Civil Procedure the appellee is entitled to an affirmance on certificate of the judgment of the trial court.

The motion to affirm on certificate is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

May 10, 2011

Mr. David Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street

P.O. Box 1105

Richmond, VA 23218

Dear Mr. Paylor:

 On March 4, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to 

the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental 

Quality (VADEQ). The SIP revision consists of amendments to regulation 9VAC5-20-21 in 

order to update the list of appendices under documents incorporated by reference and regulation 

9VAC5-30-70 in order to add a new primary 1-hour standard for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). EPA 

has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete and is reviewing it 

to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

 If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory Becoat, 

at (215) 814-2036, the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely,

 /s/

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Mr. Michael G. Dowd, Air Quality Division Director

 Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
```

[Federal Register: April 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 72)]
[Notices]
[Page 19626]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15ap10-30]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DOD-2010-OS-0046]


Privacy Act of 1974; Systems of Records

AGENCY: Defense Logistics Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Logistics Agency proposes to delete a system of
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on
May 17, 2010 unless comments are received which result in a contrary
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is
of make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody Sinkler at (703) 767-5045.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Logistics Agency systems of
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available
from the Chief Privacy and FOIA Officer, Headquarters Defense Logistics
Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir,
VA 22060-6221.
    The Agency proposes to delete a system of records notice in its
inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5
U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not within the
purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a),
as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system
report.

    Dated: April 12, 2010.
Mitchell S. Bryman,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletion:
    S900.10.

System name:
    Personnel Roster/Locator Files (December 26, 2002; 67 FR 78780).

Reason:
    Records are now being maintained under a DoD-wide system of records
identified as DPR 39 DoD, entitled ``DoD Personnel Accountability and
Assessment System.''

[FR Doc. 2010-8656 Filed 4-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1365 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1365

  To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 
provide for use of excess funds available under that Act to provide for 
               certain benefits, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2011

  Mr. Rahall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 
provide for use of excess funds available under that Act to provide for 
               certain benefits, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coal Accountability and Retired 
Employee Act of 2011'' or the ``CARE Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF SURFACE MINING CONTROL AND RECLAMATION ACT OF 
              1977.

    Section 402(i)(2) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act 
of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1232(i)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Subject to'' and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Excess amounts.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Subject to paragraph 
                        (3), and after all transfers referred to in 
                        paragraph (1) and subparagraph (A) of this 
                        paragraph have been made, any amounts remaining 
                        after the application of paragraph (3)(A) 
                        (without regard to this subparagraph) shall be 
                        transferred to the trustees of the 1974 UMWA 
                        Pension Plan and used solely to pay pension 
                        benefits required under such plan.
                            ``(ii) 1974 umwa pension plan.--In this 
                        subparagraph the term `1974 UMWA Pension Plan' 
                        means a pension plan referred to in section 
                        9701(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
                        but without regard to whether participation in 
                        such plan is limited to individuals who retired 
                        in 1976 and thereafter.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1488 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit discrimination on 

account of sexual orientation or gender identity when extending credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2011 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ANDREWS, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. 

BERKLEY, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. CAPUANO, Ms. CHU, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Mr. CLAY, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. 

ELLISON, Mr. FILNER, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

GUTIERREZ, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HOLT, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Ms. LEE of California, Mr. LEWIS of 

Georgia, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. LUJA ́N, Mrs. MALONEY, 

Mr. MORAN, Mr. NADLER, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PETERS, Ms. PINGREE of 

Maine, Mr. POLIS, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. RICHARDSON, Mr. ROTHMAN of 

New Jersey, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. SUTTON, Mr. STARK, Mr. 

TOWNS, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. WAXMAN, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. ENGEL, and 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit 

discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender 

identity when extending credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1488 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom from Dis3 crimination in Credit Act of 2011’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION ON AC5 COUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR GEN6 DER IDENTITY. 

7 Subsection (a)(1) of section 701 of the Equal Credit 

8 Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘on the basis of race, color, reli10 gion, national origin, sex or marital status,’’; and 

11 (2) by inserting ‘‘on the basis of race, color, re12 ligion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender 

13 identity, or marital status,’’. 

14 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

15 Section 702 of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 

16 U.S.C. 1691a) is amended— 

17 (1) by striking subsections (f) and (g); and 

18 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol19 lowing new subsections: 

20 ‘‘(f) The term ‘gender identity’ means the gender-re21 lated identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other gen22 der-related characteristics of an individual, with or with23 out regard to the individual’s designated sex at birth. 

24 ‘‘(g) The term ‘person’ means a natural person, a 

25 corporation, government or governmental subdivision or 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1488 IH

1 agency, trust, estate, partnership, cooperative, or associa2 tion. 

3 ‘‘(h) The term ‘sexual orientation’ means homosex4 uality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality. 

5 ‘‘(i) Any reference to any requirement imposed under 

6 this title or any provision of this title shall be deemed to 

7 include a reference to the regulations of the Board under 

8 this title or the provision of this title in question.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Healthcare Decision Making.                    

*Date:*                         March 18, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Janetta Lun, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer,  Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg. Suite 213,  (301) 496-9666,                         *janetta.lun@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 14, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-03403 Filed 2-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50088 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAYMOND GILET CARPENTER, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-95-CR-289-1

- - - - - - - - - - August 14, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Raymond Gilet Carpenter, Jr., appeals his sentence following a guilty-plea conviction for making false and fraudulent statements to a government agency and to the Commodity Credit Corporation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and 15 U.S.C. § 714m(a). He bases his appeal on the grounds that the district court erred in refusing to depart downwardly after he provided substantial assistance to the Government and in refusing toNo. 97-50088 - 2 - permit another judge to determine the appropriateness of a downward departure. The plea agreement Carpenter entered into with the Government waived his right to appeal his sentence except as to a sentence imposed outside the 21-to-27-month range. The sentence he received, 22 months, fell within that range. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the waiver was informed and voluntary and is therefore binding on Carpenter. His appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is dismissed. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
APPEAL DISMISSED.