alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12337]


Regional Meeting of the Binational Bridges and Border Crossings 
Group in Mexico City, Mexico

ACTION: Notice of a meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Delegates from the United States and Mexican governments, the 
states of New Mexico and Texas, and the Mexican states of Chihuahua, 
Coahuila, Nuevo Laredo, and Tamaulipas will participate in a regional 
meeting of the U.S.-Mexico Binational Bridges and Border Crossings 
Group. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss operational matters 
involving existing and proposed international bridges and border 
crossings and their related infrastructure and to exchange technical 
information as well as views on policy. This meeting will include a 
public session. This session will allow proponents of proposed bridges 
and border crossings and related projects to make presentations to the 
delegations and members of the public.

DATES: March 13, 2024 at 9 a.m. Public session from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mexico City, Mexico.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on the meeting 
and to attend the public session, please contact Beney Lee, Border 
Affairs Officer, via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#44282121262e760437302530216a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="38545d5d5a520a784b4c594c5d165f574e">[email protected]</span></a>, by phone at 202-647-
9894, or by mail at Office of Mexican Affairs, Room 3924, Department of 
State, 2201 C St. NW, Washington, DC 20520.

Hillary C. Quam,
Border Coordinator, Office of Mexican Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-03639 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O S. A P - 76, 234 & A P - 76, 235

EX PA R TE JO H N ED I SO N LA SH ER , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ONS F OR W RI TS OF HABE AS CORP US C A U SE N O S. C M - 01- 192- 1 A N D C M - 01- 193- 1 I N T HE 2 7 8 J UDI CI AL DI S TR I CT COURT

TH FROM LEON CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1 .07 of the Te x as Code of Criminal Proce dure, the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to thi s C o u rt t h es e appli cations for writs of habe as cor

pus. Ex parte Y oung , 4 1 8 S
. W
. 2 d

8 2 4 , 8 2 6 (T ex . C ri m . Ap p . 1 9 6 7 ). Ap p l i ca n t p l ea d ed gu i l t y t o o n e c h ar ge of a g g ra va te d se xua l a ssa

ult of a c hil d, a nd on e c ha rg e of ind e c e nc y wi th a c hild , an d o ri g ina lly
rec eived de fer

red a djudication community supervision. His g uilt was later adjudicated, and he wa s sentenc ed to life i mprisonment for the ag g ravated s exual assault, and ten y ear s’ i mprisonment for the indece ncy

char g e.2

Ap pli c a nt c on te nd s th a t he wa s d e nie d h is r ig ht t o a pp e a l th ro ug h no fa

ult of his ow n. Hi s trial counsel f

iled a mot ion to withdraw, and r equeste d that appellate counsel be appointed. The trial court g rante d the motion and appointed appe llate counse l, but appellate c ounsel was not notified of the a pp oin tme nt u

nti l th e tim e fo r f

ili ng a no tic e of a

pp e a l ha d e xpir e d. Th e Te nth Court of Ap pe a ls dismiss ed Applica

nt’s appea ls as untimely
. Las he r v . S tat e , Nos. 10-07-00081- CR & 10-07-00082- CR (Tex. App. – W aco, Ma y 30, 2007). The trial c ourt has deter

mined that Applicant was denied the assistance of counsel during the period for filing a notice of appe al, throug h no fault of his own. We find that Applica nt did not have
a ny a ssi sta nc e of c ouns e l du

ri ng the tim e fo r f

ili ng a no tic e of a pp e a l, an d the re fo re he is e nti tle d to the op po rt

un ity to f ile a n out- of

-t ime a pp e a l of the se nte nc e s im

po se d a ft e r a dju dic a tio n o f guil t in C a u s e N o s . C M
- 0 1
- 1 9 2
- 1 a n d C M
- 0 1
- 1 9 3
- 1 f r o m t h e 2 7 8 t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t C o u rt o f L e o n C o u n t y. Applicant is order ed re turned to t hat time at which he may g ive a wr itten notice of a

ppeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful appea l. All time limit s shall be calculated
a s if the se nte nc e ha d be e n imp os e d on the da te on wh ic h th e mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s. We h old that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appe al, he must take aff irmative steps to file a w ritten
no tic e of a pp e a l in the tr ia l c ourt

wi thi n 3 0 d a y s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: September

30, 2009 Do No t Pu

bli sh
#### Dennis Ransom GIBSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28376.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1956.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the driving of a motor vehicle while intoxicated’ upon a public highway, with punishment assessed at a fine of $200 and confinement in jail for three days.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for the consideration of this court.

The judgment of the trial court is a£• firmed.
#### M. L. DRANE, Appellant, v. Jonell WELLS, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 5, 1957.

Terry L. Hatchett, Shelley T. Riherd, Glasgow, for appellant.

Philip Wilson, Glasgow, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellee was awarded a judgment for $275 on a jury verdict for damages growing out of a collision of her car with that of the appellant. We think the case was one for the jury and that no error prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights occurred on the trial.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                               Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 
2-93079 and No. 333-42363 of GateField Corporation on Form S-8 and No. 
33-12170, No. 33-36124, No. 333-08089 and No. 333-27283 on Form S-3 of our 
reports dated April 8, 1998 appearing in and incorporated by reference in the 
Annual Report of Form 10-K of GateField Corporation for the year ended 
December 31, 1997.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
April 14, 1998
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

556 

KA 12-01169 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JONATHAN LEWICKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (VINCENT F. GUGINO OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (NICHOLAS T. TEXIDO

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County

(Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered June 12, 2012. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same Memorandum as in People v Lewicki ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [June 13, 2014]).

Entered: June 13, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0895
FROM: Larry Sorrels, US EPA/OAQPS/HEID
DATE : October 17, 2011
SUBJECT: Links to References Related to the Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed

Manganese Ferroalloys RTR.

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide citations and links to electronic versions of the following key references in the Regulatory Impact Analysis. Roman, et al., 2008. Expert Judgment Assessment of the Mortality Impact of Changes in Ambient Fine Pa rticulate Matter in the U.S. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7, 2268

– 2274. F ound on the Internet at. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es0713882

. Fann, N., C.M. Fulcher, B.J. Hubbell. 2009. “The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution.” Air Qual Atmos Health (2009) 2:169

– 176. Found on the Internet at http://www.springerlink.com/content/1381522137744641/fulltext.html

. Pope et al, 2002. “Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long

- term Exposure to Fine Particulate Air Pollution.” Journal of the American Medical Associatio n. 287:1132

- 1141. F ound on the Internet at http://jama.ama

- assn.org/content/287/9/1132.full.pdf+html

. Laden et al, 2006. “Reduction in Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality .” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

. 173: 667

- 672. Found on the Internet at http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/reprint/173/6/667

.
#### Bill ALLEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27918.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1956.

*760No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

, PER CURIAM.-

Drunken driving is the offense, with a prior conviction for an offense of like character. The punishment herein assessed is a fine of $250 and fifteen days in jail.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or'bills-of exception. 'All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed,
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Communication Intelligence Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Francis V. Dane, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   March 26, 2004

By: /s/ Francis V. Dane
          Principal Financial Officer
#### John L. SHELBY v. STATE.

No. 28683.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 2, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty.,' Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated, with a former conviction for a like offense; the punishment, 6 months in jail.

Appellant has now filed his personal affidavit requesting the dismissal of the appeal. The request is granted.

The appeal is dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: In re Fountain Firearms, Inc., Relator

Appellate case number: 01-15-00761-CV

Trial court case number: 13-DCV-205348

Trial court: 240th District Court of Fort Bend County

On September 8, 2015, the relator, Fountain Firearms, Inc., filed a petition for a 

writ of mandamus seeking to vacate the respondent trial judge’s July 15, 2015 order 

denying the relator’s motion for summary judgment and directing the trial judge to grant 

the relator’s motion for summary judgment. Relator’s petition had named the Honorable 

Thomas R. Culver III, as the respondent, the presiding judge at the time of the challenged 

order. However, because the Honorable Chad Bridges has since been appointed the 

presiding judge of the 240th District Court on August 26, 2015, relator filed a motion to 

abate and substitute on September 11, 2015, seeking to abate this proceeding to permit 

the successor judge to reconsider the challenged order.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to substitute Judge Chad Bridges as the 

respondent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 7.2(a). Further, relator’s motion to abate is granted, and 

this case is abated and remanded to allow Judge Bridges to reconsider the July 15, 2015 

order denying the relator’s motion for summary judgment. See id. at 7.2(b).

The Court orders the trial court clerk to file, within 30 days of the date of this 

order or, if the trial court schedules a hearing, within 15 days of that hearing, a 

supplemental clerk’s record with the successor’s order on reconsideration with the Clerk 

of this Court. This case is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. This original proceeding will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket 

when a compliant supplemental clerk’s record, and a supplemental reporter’s record, if 

any, are filed. The Court will also consider a motion to reinstate by either party.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Date: September 15, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1560 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 144
112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1560

                          [Report No. 112-222]

  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  Tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2011

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

                           September 23, 2011

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  Tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 tribe.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 
Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-
7(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) any person of Tigua Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Indian 
        blood enrolled by the tribe.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 144

112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1560

                          [Report No. 112-222]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  Tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 tribe.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 23, 2011

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
REGINALD HOLSTON

, Appellant,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 5

- 1551

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 17, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Suwannee County

. David W. Fina, Judge.

Reginald Holston , pro se, Appellant

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Mark S. Urban, Assistant Attorney General, Eric Gonzalez, Assistant Attorney General, and Kenneth Steely, General Counsel, Tallahassee

, for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

W OLF

, WINOKUR

, and WINSOR , JJ., CONCUR.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1667 

To postpone the date for the transfer of functions to the Bureau of Consumer 

Financial Protection if the Bureau does not yet have a Director in place. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2011 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. CANSECO, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. HENSARLING, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. GARRETT, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, 

Mr. POSEY, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. CAMPBELL, and Mr. RENACCI) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To postpone the date for the transfer of functions to the 

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection if the Bureau 

does not yet have a Director in place. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau of Consumer 

5 Financial Protection Transfer Clarification Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1667 IH

1 SEC. 2. DIRECTOR REQUIRED BEFORE TRANSFER. 

2 Section 1062 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

3 and Consumer Protection Act is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following new subsection: 

5 ‘‘(d) DIRECTOR REQUIRED BEFORE TRANSFER.— 

6 Notwithstanding the other provisions of this section, the 

7 single calendar date for the transfer of functions to the 

8 Bureau under section 1061 shall be the later of— 

9 ‘‘(1) the date that would have been designated, 

10 but for the application of this subsection; and 

11 ‘‘(2) the date on which the Director of the Bu12 reau is confirmed by the Senate pursuant to section 

13 1011(b).’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Form  10-KSB of  Cortech,  Inc.  for the year  ended  December  31,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000728478
<NAME>                        CORTECH, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         6,648
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              13,370
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            179
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           4
<OTHER-SE>                                    13,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13,370
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,225
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,883
<INCOME-TAX>                                     233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,650
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,650
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.43



</TABLE>
#### BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 02-862.

Supreme Court of United States

March *10, 2003.*

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
#### Raymond Jabe WHIRLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28036.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1956.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $400.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
II 

Calendar No. 445 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1791 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2011 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JANUARY 24, 2012 

Committee discharged; referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

JULY 10, 2012 

Reported by Mrs. BOXER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse under construction at 101 South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, 

Florida, as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United States 

Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse under construction at 

5 101 South United States Route 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1791 RS

1 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, 

2 Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

6 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

7 to be a reference to the ‘‘Alto Lee Adams, Sr., United 

8 States Courthouse’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 445 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1791 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse under 

Adams, Sr., United States Courthouse’’. 1 in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ‘‘Alto Lee construction at 101 South United States Route 

JULY 10, 2012 

Reported without amendment 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS