alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
KIK Technology International, Inc.
File No. 000-30071

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
William M. Knooihuizen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 22, 2006                      By: /s/ William M. Knooihuizen
      ---------------                         ----------------------------------
                                                          William M. Knooihuizen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kuldip C. Baid, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 22, 2006                      By: /s/ Kuldip C. Baid
      ---------------                         ----------------------------------
                                                                  Kuldip C. Baid
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained by KIK
Technology  International,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 258TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRINITY COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 23rd

day of January, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

IN THE INTEREST OF S. R., A CHILD

NO. 12-14-00238-CV; Trial Court No. 20870

Opinion by Brian Hoyle, Justice.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 20th day of July, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please

2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 

3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated

4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does

5 not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 VILLAGE OF RUIDOSO,

8 Plaintiff-Appellee,

9 v. NO. 30,765

10 LOGAN GARRISON,

11 Defendant-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY

13 James Waylon Counts, District Judge

14 Bryant, Schneider-Cook Law Firm

15 Daniel A. Bryant

16 Ruidoso, NM

17 for Appellee

18 Logan Garrison

19 Ruidoso, NM 

20 Pro Se Appellant

21 MEMORANDUM OPINION

22 VIGIL, Judge.

23 Appellant Logan Garrison (Defendant) appeals from the district court’s ruling

24 that affirms his municipal court conviction for violation of the ordinance requiring that
2

1 he have a driver’s license. Our notice proposed to affirm. While this Court granted

2 Defendant’s request for an extension of time to file a memorandum in opposition,

3 Defendant never filed a memorandum in opposition. For reasons set forth in our

4 notice, we affirm.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 _______________________________

7 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________ 

10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Exhibit 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-121857) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-93697 and
333-93695) of QMed, Inc. of our report dated January 25, 2005 relating to the
consolidated financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/ Amper, Politziner & Mattia, P.C.

Edison, New Jersey
February 10, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         846,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,000,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                   101,000
<INVENTORY>                                    202,951
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,149,186
<PP&E>                                       5,768,148
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,656,764
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,507,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,623,094
<BONDS>                                      6,034,023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,485
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,962,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,218,234
<SALES>                                      2,435,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,130,251
<CGS>                                        1,820,352
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,820,352
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             893,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,978,913
<INCOME-TAX>                                   597,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,381,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,381,613
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
#### Horace Lee GRIDER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 39272.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 16, 1966.

*938Minor Pounds, Lubbock, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while his operator’s license was suspended under the provisions of Art. 6701h Vernon’s Ann.Civ. St.; the punishment, a fine of $125.

The statement of facts found in the record cannot be considered, it not having been filed in the trial court as required by Sec. 4 of Art. 759a Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. in effect at the time notice of appeal herein was given. Salyer v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.C. 532, 316 S.W.2d 420; Burrus v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 307 S.W.2d 91.

The complaint and information are sufficient under the holding of this Court in Adams v. State, 376 S.W.2d 832, to charge the offense defined in Section 5 of Art. 6701h V.A.C.S., the punishment for which is found in. Section 32(c) of said Article.

The trial court did not err in overruling the appellant’s motion to quash the information.

In the absence of a statement of •facts which we can consider, the question of whether there is a fatal variance between the allegations of' the indictment and the proof as to the ground upon which appellant’s operator’s license was suspended, and whether such suspension 'was under Art. 6687b V.A.C.S. rather than under. Art. 6701h V.A.C.S. is not before,us.

The judgment is affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2015

No. 04-15-00052-CV

Billy C. WHITFIELD and Carolyn Whitfield,

Appellants

v.

Charles Thomas ONDREJ, et al.,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-10-00231-CVK

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants seek to appeal a summary judgment order signed on January 8, 2015. After 

appellants filed their brief, appellees filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, arguing 

that the summary judgment order is a non-appealable interlocutory order because it did not 

resolve appellees’ claims for attorneys’ fees. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 

200, 205 (Tex. 2001) (summary judgment that does not dispose of all parties and causes of action 

is not final and appealable). Appellants filed a response to the motion to dismiss in which they 

argued that the trial court intended to and did dispose of all causes of action by the order. 

Appellees alternatively request that the appeal be abated to permit the trial court to clarify its 

intention. Appellants filed a reply in support of the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction 

reiterating that the summary judgment order did not address appellees’ counterclaims and 

requests for attorneys’ fees.

After reviewing the record, it appears that the summary judgment is interlocutory because 

it does not dispose of the appellees’ claims for attorneys’ fees, and no severance order appears in 

the clerk’s record. See McNally v. Guevara, 52 S.W.3d 195, 195 (Tex. 2001) (summary 

judgment that does not dispose of attorneys’ fees is not a final, appealable order); Lehmann, 39 

S.W.3d at 200, 205. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this appeal is ABATED for a period of 

45 days to permit the trial court to either: (1) hear and dispose of the appellees’ pending claims

for attorneys’ fees and enter a final judgment; or (2) enter an order severing the pending 

attorneys’ fees claims in order to render the January 8, 2015 summary judgment order final and 

appealable. 
The appellants are further ORDERED to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the 

trial court’s final judgment or severance order, and a supplemental reporter’s record if 

applicable, in this court within 30 days after expiration of the abatement period. Further, 

within 30 days after the expiration of the abatement period, appellants must file either: (1) a 

letter informing the court that they are relying on their original brief, or (2) an amended brief. 

Appellees’ brief is due within 30 days of the appellants filing either a letter informing the court 

that they are relying on their original brief, or appellants’ amended brief. All other appellate 

deadlines are suspended pending further order of the court.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of November, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
## Evaluation Language for Generic Application Packages

**A strong evaluation plan should be included in the application narrative and should be used, as appropriate, to shape the development of the project from the beginning**  **of the grant period. The plan s hould include benchmarks to monitor progress**  **toward specific project objectives and also outcome measures to assess the impact on teaching and learning or other important outcomes for project participants.**  **More specifically, the plan should identify the i ndividual and/or organization that**  **have agreed to serve as evaluator for the project and describe the qualifications of that evaluator. The plan should describe the evaluation design, indicating: (1) what**  **types of data will be collected; (2) when various types of data will be collected; (3)**  **what methods will be used; (4) what instruments will be developed and when; (5) how the data will be analyzed; (6) when reports of results and outcomes will be**  **available; and (7) how the applicant will use the informati on collected through the**  **evaluation to monitor progress of the funded project and to provide accountability information both about success at the initial site and effective strategies for**  **replication in other settings. Applicants are encouraged to devote an appropriate**  **level of resources to project evaluation.**

Successful applicants will be expected to report annually on the progress of each project or study included in the grant, including a description of preliminary or key findings and an explanation of an y changes in goals, objectives, methodology, or planned products or publications.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

         THE WENDT-BRISTOL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                         ------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     STATE OF                       OWNERSHIP OF
                      NAME                        INCORPORATION                  VOTING SECURITIES
                      ----                        -------------                  -----------------

 Consolidated Subsidiaries:

<S>                                                  <C>          <C>                   
   The Wendt-Bristol Company                         Delaware     100% by The Wendt-Bristol Health
    ("Wendt-Bristol")                                             Services Corporation

   Wendt-Bristol Home Health                           Ohio       100% by Wendt-Bristol
    Care Company

   Wendt-Bristol Diagnostics                           Ohio       85.5% by Wendt-Bristol
    Company (1)

   Wendt-Bristol Organizational                        Ohio       100% by Wendt-Bristol
    L.P., Inc.

   1275 Olentangy River Road                           Ohio       Wendt-Bristol is the sole general and
    Limited Partnership (2) (3)                                   limited partner

   Wendt-Bristol Diagnostics                         Delaware     Wendt-Bristol Diagnostics Company is
    Company L.P. (2)                                              the sole general partner

   Consolidated Medical                                Ohio       100% by Wendt-Bristol Home Health
    Services, Inc.                                                Care Company

   CMSI Medco Limited                                  Ohio       Consolidated Medical Services is the
    Partnership (2) (3)                                           sole general partner

   American Living Centers, Inc.                       Ohio       100% by Wendt-Bristol

   American Care Center, Inc.                          Ohio       100% by American Living Centers, Inc.
    dba Bristol House of Columbus

   Ethan Allen Care Center, Inc.                       Ohio       100% by American Living Centers, Inc.
    dba Bristol House of Springfield

   Congress Liquors, Inc. (3)                        Florida      100% by Wendt-Bristol

   Health America, Inc.                                Ohio       100% by Wendt-Bristol Diagnostics
     dba The Wendt-Bristol Center                                 Company

   American Hospital of Athens, Inc. (3)               Ohio       100% by Health America, Inc.
</TABLE>


 (1)  See Item 1.  Business - MEDICAL AND RELATED SERVICES
 (2)  Limited partnership
 (3)  Inactive

                                      IV-8
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-112]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)

Filed February 12, 2024 10 a.m. EST Through February 16, 2024 10 a.m. EST

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

## Notice

                    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxapps.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-II/​public/​action/​eis/​search.*

*EIS No. 20240029, Draft, GSA, AK,*                     Alcan Land Port of Entry Expansion and Modernization Draft Environmental Impact Statement Alcan, Alaska,  Comment Period Ends: 04/11/2024, Contact: Aaron Evanson 206-445-5876.                

*EIS No. 20240030, Final, NRCS, PRO,*                     ADOPTION—PROGRAMMATIC—Habitat Restoration Activities Implemented throughout the Coastal United States,  Review Period Ends: 03/25/2024, Contact: Angela Trahan 337-291-3142.                

The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) has adopted the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Final EIS No. 20150171 filed 06/11/2015 with the Environmental Protection Agency. The NRCS was not a cooperating agency on this project. Therefore, republication of the document is necessary under Section 1506.3(b)(1) of the CEQ regulations.

*EIS No. 20240031, Final, TVA, TN,*                     Kingston Fossil Plant Retirement,  Review Period Ends: 03/25/2024, Contact: Chevales Williams 423-751-7316.                

Dated: February 20, 2024.

Julie Smith, 

Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2024-03690 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Emanuel Chirico, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 10, 2006



|By:   | /s/ Emanuel Chirico                     | 
|----- | --------------------------------------- | 
|Name: | Emanuel Chirico
Chief Executive Officer | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Marshall GARNER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28051.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1956.

No attorney .on appeal for appellant.

Léon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful possession of beer, whiskey, wine and gin for the pur*626pose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, 20 days in jail and a fine of $400.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMG Oil Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 29th day of July, 2004.

BY:
/s/ Michael Hart                        Michael Hart, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

The Coast Distribution System, Inc. 

 

Annual Report on Form 10-K 

for the Year ended December 31, 2004, 

as Amended on Form 10-K/A 

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

 

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, asfiled by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and as amended by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Annual Report”), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements ofSection 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: April 26, 2005