alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the
annual period ended June 3, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kerry Mustoe, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                
|/s/ Kerry Mustoe                                                                                                
|Kerry Mustoe Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer  August 14, 2006

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Willie FARRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28391.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1956.

^o attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State s Atty., Austin, for the State-

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Interdisciplinary Aging Infrastructure.                    

*Date:*                         March 20, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kaitlyn Noel Lewis Hardell, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2E405, (301) 555-1234,                         *kaitlyn.hardell@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 15, 2024. 

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-03552 Filed 2-21-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

132329(99)(102) 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

CITY OF DETROIT,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ 

Appellee, 

 SC: 132329 

v COA: 257415 

AMBASSADOR BRIDGE COMPANY 

Wayne CC: 01-106546-CZ 

a/k/a DETROIT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/

Appellant. 

______________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension to 

September 5, 2007 of the time for filing its brief is considered and it is GRANTED. The 

motion by the Michigan Municipal League and others for leave to file a brief amicus 

curiae is considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 17, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Subrah S. Iyar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2002


/s/ Subrah S. Iyar
---------------------------
Subrah S. Iyar
Chief Executive Officer




This statement is submitted pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and shall not be
deemed to be filed for the purpose of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section.
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION

I, Marc Juliar, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB Kodiak Energy, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and I have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
     being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and


<PAGE>


     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.


Date: July 29, 2005               /s/ Marc Juliar
                                  -----------------------
                                  Marc Juliar
                                  Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-130338)
and Form S-8 (No. 333-124626) of Cadiz, Inc. of our
report dated March 16, 2006 relating to the financial
statements, financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this
Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 16, 2006
EXHIIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Island Critical Care. on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended Sept 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.     the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


Dated:  August 10, 2004          /s/ Marc Juliar
                                 ----------------------
                                 Name: Marc Juliar
                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 10, 2004          /s/ Marc Juliar
                                 ----------------------
                                 Name: Marc Juliar
                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
NO. 07-10-0251-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 4, 2010

__________________ ____________ JULIE MARIE ST. CLAIR, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________ _______________ FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 58,965-B; HON. JOHN BOARD., PRESIDING

__________________ _____________ Abatement and Remand

__________________ _____________ Before QUINN, C.J., a nd CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Pending before us is a joint motion to abate the appeal and remand the matter back to the trial court so that findings of fact and conclusions of law can be filed. The record reflects that appellant, timely, filed a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. However, none were ever filed. In State v. Cullen , 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006), the Court of Criminal Appeals held that , "[u]pon the request of the losing party on a motion to suppress evidence, the trial court shall state its essential2 findings." In Cullen , the Court explained that, the trial c ourt's refusal to state its findings and conclusions prevented the court of appea ls from a meaningful review of the decision to grant or deny the motion to suppress. Id. at 698. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the matter back to the trial court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.4. We further direct the H onorable John Board, judge of the 181st Judicial District Court, Potter County, Te xas, to execute findings of fact and conclusions of law in this cause as required by State v. Cullen, supra . We also direct him to execute his findings and conclusions and file them with the clerk of this court, via a supplemental clerk's record, on or before November 3, 2010. U pon the filing of the supplemental clerk's record containing the findings and conclusions, the appeal will be reinstated. It is so ordered. Per Curiam
Opinion issued July 9, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00513-CR

NO. 01-15-00515-CR

NO. 01-15-00516-CR

———————————

IN RE MICHAEL BLAIR, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

1

The underlying causes of action are Michael Blair v. The State of Texas, in the 

District Court of Harris County, Texas, 208th Judicial District, cause nos. 703912, 

709436, and 709438, the Honorable Denise Collins presiding.
2

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator Michael Blair seeks a writ of 

mandamus compelling the trial court to rule on a motion for judgment nunc pro 

tunc.

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. All outstanding motions 

are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b)
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated February 27, 1998, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of The Coast Distribution System and
Subsidiaries (the Company) included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997. We hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of said report in the Company's Registration Statements on Forms
S-8 (File Nos. 33-10769, 33-15322, 33-18696, 33-64582 and 33-86072, effective
December 12, 1986, June 25, 1987, December 1, 1987, June 17, 1993 and November
8, 1994, respectively) and on Form S-3 (File No. 33-33780, effective March 9,
1990).


GRANT THORNTON LLP

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

San Jose, California
March 27, 1998
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                            |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                            |
|        | /s/ Jay Rifkin                                  |
|   | Jay RifkinChief Executive OfficerApril 15, 2008 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet, Income Statement and Exhibit 11 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          23,201
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,225
<INVENTORY>                                     60,845
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               142,022
<PP&E>                                          89,690
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,261
<BONDS>                                          1,451
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           152
<OTHER-SE>                                     153,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,744
<SALES>                                        272,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,299
<CGS>                                          135,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  135,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  76
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,943
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,160
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,277
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.45
        


</TABLE>
2001 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

6-27-2001

Maldonado v. Houstoun

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-1893

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2001 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Maldonado v. Houstoun" (2001). 2001 Decisions. Paper 140.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2001/140
Filed June 27, 2001 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

No. 97-1893 

EDWIN MALDONADO; MARIA DELORES MALDONADO, 

individually and as next friends of Ana Maldonado, Pablo 

Maldonado, Edwin Maldonado, Rey Maldonado, Y esenia

Maldonado, and Jose Maldonado, and on behalf of all

others similarly situated; MARIA ORTIZ; MICHAEL ORTIZ, 

individually and as next friends of Julie Ortiz, Michael 

Ortiz, and Angelica Ortiz, and on behalf of all other 

similarly situated; KENSINGTON WELFARE RIGHTS 

UNION; PHILADELPHIA WELFARE RIGHTS 

ORGANIZATION, on behalf of themselves and their 

members; TRAVELER'S AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA, 

individually and on behalf of its clients 

v. 

FEATHER O. HOUSTOUN, Secretary of the 

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE; 

DON JOSE STOVALL, Executive Director of the 

PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF ASSISTANCE, both in their 

official capacities, 

Appellants 

STAPLETON, ROSENN, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, 

Judge, United States Court of International T rade*

_________________________________________________________________ 

* The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge, United States Court of 

International Trade, sitting by designation. 
ORDER 

The motion for attorneys' fees and costs in the above 

matter is granted according to the Opinion Sur Motion for 

Attorneys' Fees and Costs hereto attached. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/Max Rosenn 

 Circuit Judge 

Dated: June 27, 2001 

A True Copy: 

Teste: 

 Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals 

 for the Third Circuit 

 2
#### Manuel RODRIGUEZ et al., Appellants, v. Antonia C. DEL MORAL et vir, Appellees.

No. 19574.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Oct. 21, 1959.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 12, 1959.

Homero M. Lopez, Kingsville, for appellants.

Royce C. Johnston, Kingsville, for appel-lees.

PER CURIAM.

Oh August 27, 1959, appellants filed a motion for extension of time to file a transcript and statement of facts. They asked that the time be extended until September 21. This Court granted that motion on September 23, but appellants tendered neither the transcript nor the statement of facts. On October 16, appellants tendered another motion for extension of time but asserted no grounds for a further extension. The time for tendering the documents has already expired and the motion is overruled.

On Appellants’ Motions

This Court, with Chief Justice Murray dissenting, on September 23, 1959, granted *897appellants’ motion for extension of time to file the transcript and statement of facts. On October 21, the whole Court refused appellants’ second motion for extension of time to file the transcript and statement of facts.

Now appellants have filed a motion for rehearing and a motion for leave to file the transcript only. These documents, just filed, disclose that the judgment was dated June 22, 1959, but no request was made for the preparation of a transcript until October 8. Had we known, when the first motion for extension of time was filed, that the transcript had not even been ordered, the motion would have been denied. An unexplained delay of 108 days in ordering a transcript defeats good cause required by Rule 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

Appellants’ motion for rehearing is overruled and their motion to file transcript is denied.