alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Carl Emanuel Lewis v. Bridney Yancy

Appellate case number: 01-19-00348-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-15182

Trial court: 280th District Court of Harris County

On June 7, 2019, appellant, Carl Emanuel Lewis, filed in this Court a Notice of 

Appeal seeking review of the trial court’s order sustaining the contest to his affidavit of 

inability to pay costs. We construe this notice of appeal as motion challenging the trial 

court’s order. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(g)(1), (2).

Accordingly, we direct the court reporter to prepare and file a reporter’s record of 

all proceedings on appellant’s claim of indigence, including a reporter’s record of the

May 21, 2019 hearing on the contest to appellant’s affidavit of inability. See TEX. R. CIV.

P. 145(g)(3). 

 The reporter’s record of the May 21, 2019 hearing and any other reporter’s records 

on the contest to the affidavit of inability shall be prepared and filed without charge to 

appellant. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(g)(3). These reporter’s record(s) are due to be filed 

no later than 14 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___July 2, 2019____
Exhibit 99.1


                       Wings & Things, Inc.

                 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                      18 U.S.C. Section 1350

      I, Linda L. Perry, Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Wings &
Things, Inc. certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.



Date: May 9, 2003
                            /s/ Linda L. Perry
                            ____________________________________
                            Linda L. Perry
                            Principal Executive and Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                    THIS  SCHEDULE   CONTAINS   SUMMARY   FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
                    EXTRACTED FROM ATLANTIC  CITY BOARDWALK ASSOCIATES,  L.P.'S 
                    FORM  10-K FOR THE YEAR  ENDED DECEMBER   31,  1998  AND  IS
                    QUALIFIED  IN  IT'S ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
                    STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0000730408
<NAME>                       ATLANTIC CITY BOARDWALK ASSOCIATES, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                         US
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                         DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,527,000
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,717,000
<PP&E>                                       184,318,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               110,952,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               104,713,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,690,000
<BONDS>                                       79,622,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                    20,401,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 104,713,000
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              27,986,000
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11,565,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,003,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            12,172,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,754,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,754,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,754,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0

        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Bertram Cutler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Assets &
Services, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 24, 2003


/s/ Bertram Cutler
-----------------------
Bertram Cutler,
President, CEO, & CFO
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Nicholas Plessas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Green Dolphin Systems
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the issuer
and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectives of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the period covered by the Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Nicholas Plessas

Nicholas Plessas

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 15, 2004
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the **

District of Nevada, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LONI VLASIS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-55794

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00890-DMSBLM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 11, 2010 

Pasadena, California

Before: TROTT and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and MAHAN, District

Judge.** 

FILED

JUN 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Loni Vlasis appeals the district court’s grant of the government’s motion for

summary judgment on her claim that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”)

improperly denied her application for disability benefits under Title XVI of the

Social Security Act. We reverse and remand for an award of benefits.

Both of Vlasis’s treating physicians opined that she was markedly limited in

her ability to complete a normal workweek, to get along with coworkers, to

respond appropriately to changes in the work setting, and to perform activities

within a schedule. Therefore, the ALJ had to provide specific and legitimate

reasons, supported by substantial evidence, for discounting those opinions. See

Lester v. Chater, 81 F.3d 821, 830 (9th Cir. 1995). Contrary to the ALJ’s decision,

the opinions of Dr. Buchert and Dr. Donnelly were not sufficiently rebutted by the

testifying medical expert. The medical expert’s paper review of the doctors’

treatment notes fails to overcome the significant weight this court affords to those

medical professionals who see the patient on a regular basis and can thus more

accurately determine the patient’s work limitations.

We have discretion whether to remand the case for additional evidence or to

award benefits. Swenson v. Sullivan, 876 F.2d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 1989). The

vocational expert testified that the limitations described by the treating physicians

would render Vlasis incapable of performing any work. Therefore, there are no
3

outstanding issues to be resolved that would preclude us from making a disability

determination. Because the treating physicians’ opinions in this case are

controlling, we reverse and remand for an award of benefits.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
#### CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT CO., Inc., Appellant, v. Clarence LEWIS, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 10, 1956.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1956.

Brock & Brock, Lexington, for appellant.

Pleaz Wm. Mobley, Manchester, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgpnent of the Clay Circuit Court awarding appellee the net sum of $1,600.14 for overpayment on a sales contract on the ground of fraud or *783mutual mistake. The court regards the •evidence admissible without a prayer for reformation of the final agreement and the verdict as being supported by the evidence.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment stands affirmed.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 4, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130449 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PETER L. TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 130449 COA: 265039 WCAC: 03-000001 LEAR SEATING CORPORATION and ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY/TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 17, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0927 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 4, 2006

Clerk
#### Isaac THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27688.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Eugene Brady, Dist. Attys., Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the unlawful sale of heroin; the punishment, 10 years.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed, and no motion for rehearing will be entertained in this appeal.
#### Roy GENTRY, Appellant. v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28040.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 14, 1955..

.No attorney on appeal for appellant.

*726Leon B. Douglas, State’s "Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

This is a conviction for burglary, .with punishment assessed at three years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.' ■

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32

                                  CERTIFICATION





Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bertram  Cutler,  President  and CFO of Global  Assets & Services,  Inc. (the
"Company"), certify that:

1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10QSB of the Company  for the period  ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         Dated:  August 6, 2004           Officer:   Bertram Cutler

                                        Name:       /s/ Bertram Cutler
                                                    ----------------------------
                                        Position:  President, CFO
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EDWIN PETER KELLY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2986

[ August 3, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; James W. McCann , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562014CF003886A

.

Rose M. Feller of Feller Law, P.A., Sanford, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J.

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIA M

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., L EVINE and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# n ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 07-0011

IN THE MATTER OF CALLING A RETIRED DISTRICTJUDGE TO ACTIVE SERVICE ORDER

The Honorable John C. Brown, Judge of the District Court for the Eighteenth Judicial District of the State of Montana, has requested the assistance of retired District Judge Mike Salvagni to assume jurisdiction of Gallatin County Cause No. DV-16-2023-0001248-DK, MontanansAgainst Irresponsible Densification, LLC v. State ofMontana. Judge Salvagni has retired under the provisions oftheMontana Judges' Retirement System and, being subject to call for duty pursuant to § 19-5-103(a) and (b), MCA, has advised that he is agreeable to assisting the Eighteenth Judicial District Court with the above-listed matter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Honorable Mike Salvagni, retired District Judge, is hereby called to active service in the District Court ofthe Eighteenth Judicial District ofthe State ofMontana, to
assume judicial authority of Gallatin County Cause No. DV-16-2023-0001248-DK, Montanans Against Irresponsible Densification, LLC v. State ofMontana, and is hereby authorized to proceed with any and all necessary hearings, opinions. and orders, including final resolution ofsaid matter. 2. For all active service, Judge Salvagni shall be paid the salary compensation to which he is entitled by § 19-5-103(2)(b), MCA, and actual expenses, if any, shall be reimbursed. 

# FD DEC 2 6 2023
Bowen Greenw000 C. • - Gi ur,

12/27/2023

Case Number: PR 07-0011

### 3. A copy of this Order shall be filed with the Clerk of Court of the Eighteenth

Judicial District with the request that this Order be sent to all counsel of record in the above-listed matter. 4.A copy ofthis Order shall alsobe furnishedtothe Honorable John C.Brown,the Honorable Mike Salvagni, and to Cathy Pennie, Office of the Supreme Court Administrator. The ChiefJustice entersthis Orderpursuant toArticleVII, Section 6(3)ofthe 1972 MontanaConstitution, and statutesenacted in conformity therewith and in implementation thereof. DATED this e--73- day ofDecember, 2023.

ChiefJustice

2
#### Harold J. LOZANO, Jr., Appellant, v. John VIVIAN, Appellee.

No. 12857.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 11, 1955.

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1955.

Lee Minner, San Antonio, for appellant.

Wolff & Wolff, Alexander Fraser, San Antonio, for appellee.

. NORVELL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment for $17,854.17, principal, interest and 1 attorneys fees, due upon a certain promissory note dated August 7, 1953, executed by Defendant, Harold J. Lozano, Jr., and payable to the order of plaintiff, John Vivian. A foreclosure of a deed of triist lien upon certain real property located in McLennan County, Texas, was also decreed as against Lozano and one Billy Tubb, who had been made a party to the suit in order that his rights in and to the property might be determined.

The issue primarily involved upon this appeal is the liability of Lozano for the attorney’s fees awarded in' the judgment. It seems to be the contention of appellant that the time of payment of the note was extended to some time in July, 1954. He pleaded the extension was until July 10th, but the most his evidence purports to establish is an extension until July 6th. The execution of and the liability upon the note were admitted by Lozano and further settled by an interlocutory summary judgment which left the matter of attorney’s fees open for litigation before final judgment was rendered.

Appellant presents three points, viz.:

> “1. That the trial court erred when it denied the appellee trial by jury; when the jury fee had been paid long prior to date, set for trial and said cause was placed on the jury Docket, and was on the jury docket at the time of trial.

> “2. Was tender of Payment of principal and interest made by Appellant to Appellee before due date?

> “3. When Tender of Payment of principal and interest (without attorney fees) was made in Court on day of trial and accepted by Appellee; *was Appellant entitled to a*reasonable time to bring the money into court 'in view of the past repeated refusal to accept same by Appellee?”

As to the first point, the final judgment recites that a jury had been waived. Appellant in his brief with no record support, asserts he did not waive a jury. Mere assertions in the brief cannot im-. peach the verity of solemn recitals of the judgment, and the point is overruled.

The second and third points are unusual in that they are couched in the form *562of questions. We pass over the matter of their sufficiency, as these inquiries are squarely answered by the findings of the trial judge made in pursuance to appellant’s request.

We have examined the findings of fact and conclusions of law prepared by the trial judge. The findings are supported by the evidence and they in turn fully support the conclusions of law expressed and the judgment rendered. Such findings and conclusions are adopted by this Court and- the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher M. Condron, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Christopher M. Condron
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Christopher M. Condron
                                  Chairman of the Board,
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 17, 2006
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000084219-OCT-201209:54 AM