#### Charles L. PARRISH, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30455.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 18, 1959.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*854MORRISON,' Presiding Judge.

The offense is bigamy, as denounced by Article 490a, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., in that the bigamous marriage was alleged to have occurred without the state and parties later cohabited together within this state; the punishment, two-years. ■

Mrs. Frieda Norton, a resident of Toledo, Ohio, testified that she was present in the State of Ohio on September 17, 19S5, and that she and her husband witnessed a marriage which was consummated between the appellant and one Mildred Peete. She identified her own and her husband’s signature on the marriage certificate which was introduced in evidence and stated that she visited Mildred and the appellant upon occasions during the following year while they were living together, and had come to Texas with Mildred in order to testify at the trial.

Mildred Peete testified, without objection, that she met the appellant in Toledo, Ohio, in 1955, married him before a justice of the peace on September 17, 1955, with Mrs. Norton and her husband as witnesses, and lived with the appellant as his wife until September, 1956, at which time he deserted her, and that she did not see him again until the day of the trial. She stated that she obtained a divorce from the appellant on October 25, 1957.

The application for the marriage license, the license itself, and the certificate evidencing the solemnization of the marriage were introduced in evidence.

May Hammond, a' resident of Borger, Texas, testified that she had known the appellant for several years and that they had discussed marriage prior to his departure from Borger, that she did not see him for approximately a year until shortly before November 10, 1956, .when he returned tp,-Borger and again spoke of matrimony^ She stated that on that day she and the: appellant-were united in marriage at Clayton, New Mexico, by a lady justice of the-, peace, and that following this marriage she resided with the appellant as his wife in Hutchinson County, Texas, until the day of1 his arrest, after which she received an annulment of the New Mexico marriage.

Justice of the Peace Clara Harvey, of Clayton, New Mexico, testified that she identified May Hammond as one of the parties to a marriage ceremony which she performed on November 10, 1956.

Jackie Anderson testified that he and his; wife accompanied May Hammond and the appellant to Clayton, New Mexico, ora November 10, 1956, were witnesses to their marriage, and identified his own and his wife’s signatures on the marriage certificate which was introduced into evidence along with the license and application therefor.

Appellant did not testify or introduce any evidence in his own behalf. No formal bills of exception appear in the record, and no brief has been filed.

It would appear from the hold-, ing of this Court in Rutledge v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 81, 198 S.W.2d 585, that any objection which the appellant may have had to Mildred Peete’s testimony was waived when it was admitted without the question of her competency having been raised. Even if we disregarded such testimony, the evidence would be sufficient because of the testimony of Mrs. Norton and the documentary evidence.

Finding the evidence sufficient to support the conviction and no reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.