alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Lee Andrew CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28305.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for the offense of driving while intoxicated, subsequent offense; the punishment, ten days in jail and a fine of $250.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAY LEE VAUGHN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

C. WEGMAN,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

BOWMAN,

Defendant. No. 19

- 15547

D.C. No. 1:15

- cv

- 01902

- LJO

- JLT

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O ’ Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 6, 2020 * *

Before: BERZON, N.R. SMITH, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Ray Lee Vaughn appeals pro se from the district

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAY 12 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 15547

cou rt’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the

First Amendment

, the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause, and the

Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ( “ RLUIPA ” ) , arising out of

the denial of his request for inclusion on the prison’s Je wish religious services list

and k osher meal plan

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de nov o. Mendiola

-

Martinez v. Arpaio , 836 F.3d 1239, 1247 (9th Cir. 2016). We

affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Vaughn’s First

and Fourteenth Amendment claims because Vaughn failed to raise a genuine

dispute of material fact as to whether Wegman personally participated in the

decisions that Vaughn challenges, or exercised authority over the individuals who

made those decisions. See Mendiola

- Martinez , 83 6 F.3d at 1247 ( explaining that

summary judgment is proper if a plaintiff “fails to make a sufficient showing to

support an element of” his claims); Jones v. Williams , 297 F.3d 930, 934 (9th Cir.

2002) (explaining that in order to demonstrate liability und er § 1983 , “there must

be a showing of personal participation in the alleged rights deprivation”).

The district court properly dismissed Vaughan’s RLUIPA claim as moot

because Vaughn was transferred to a different prison where he now receives

kosher meals and there is no reasonable expectation that Wegman will violate his

rights in the future. S

ee Jones v. Williams , 791 F.3d 1023, 1031 (9th Cir. 2015)3 19

- 15547

(explaining that “RLUIPA does not authorize suits for damages against state

officials in their individual capacities” ); see id . (explaining that claims for

injunctive relief are moot once the “inmate is removed from the environment in

which he is subjected to the challenged policy or practice” (citation and internal

quotation marks omitted)).

Vaughn’s motion f

or a temporary restraining order (Docket Entry No. 24) is

denied.

AFFIRMED.
Order entered April 20, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00265-CV

RWI CONSTRUCTION, INC., RWI ACQUISITION, LLC, LONE STAR 

OPPORTUNITIES FUND V, LP AND RWI CONSTRUCTION HOLDINGS, LLC,

Appellants

V.

COMERICA BANK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-01217

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this accelerated appeal is overdue. By postcard dated March 20, 

2018, we notified Court Reporter Vielica Dobbins the reporter’s record was overdue. We 

directed Ms. Dobbins to file the reporter’s record within ten days. To date, the reporter’s record 

has not been filed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Vielica Dobbins, Official Court Reporter for the 134th Judicial 

District Court, to file, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order either (1) the reporter’s record; 

(2) written verification no hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has
paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record.1

 We notify appellant that if we receive 

verification the reporter’s record has not been requested or that it has not been paid for, we may

order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Honorable Dale Tillery 

Presiding Judge

134th Judicial District Court

Vielica Dobbins

Official Court Reporter

134th Judicial District Court

All parties

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE

 

1 The docketing sheet filed by appellant in this case indicates the reporter’s record was requested on February 21, 2018 

and that payment arrangements were made.
#### STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. L. A. LEMASTER, Appellee.

No. 15575.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Jan. 28, 1955.

*165Jimmy Castledine, County Atty. of Wichita County, Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Ray Martin, Wichita Falls, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

On December 31, 1954, we entered judgment reversing the judgment of the trial court and remanding the cause for trial. After further study of the case on motion for rehearing, we have ccane to the conclusion that we were in error in so doing. Therefore, appellee’s motion for rehearing is hereby granted, the former opinion is withdrawn, and the following substituted therefor.

The County Judge of Wichita County granted L. A. Lemaster a beer permit. The State appealed to the District Court. The District Court sustained a plea in abatement and dismissed the appeal on the ground the State had no right to appeal to the District Court from an order of the County Judge granting such permit.

Under provisions of Article *667-6,*Vernon’s Texas P.C., a person desiring to sell beer must file an application with the County Judge. Notice and hearing are provided for by the statute. Paragraph (c) of the above Article provides that if upon the hearing the application is granted, the County Judge shall enter an order so certifying and the applicant shall thereupon present the same to the assessor and collector of taxes in the county wherein the application is made; the assessor and collector of taxes shall thereupon report to the Texas Liquor Control Board, certifying that the application for license hats been approved and all required fees paid. Upon the report or certification from the assessor and collector of taxes, it shall be the duty of the Board or Administrator to issue the license, provided that the Board or Administrator may refuse to issue any such license under certain circumstances set out in the statute.

Although paragraph (e) provides for an appeal to the District Court by the applicant in event his application is denied, we find no provision in the Article giving a contestant the right to appeal from the order of the County Judge granting a permit.

It is our opinion, therefore, that the District Court was not in error in sustaining the plea in abatement to the attempted appeal of the State from the order of the County Judge granting appellee a permit to sell beer.

Judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### Fio JUSTICE, Appellant, v. GUARANTEE RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF HAMMOND, INDIANA, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 8, 1957.

L. C. Farley, Pikeville, for appellant.

Wm. Baird, Baird & Hays, Pikeville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment for the defendant in an action on a group insurance policy to recover $1,000 for the death of a high school teacher and sponsor *690of cheer leaders of the school’s basketball team.

We concur in the opinion of the trial judge that the death of the insured did not occur on an occasion or under circumstances embraced in the coverage of the policy.

Motion for an appeal is, therefore, overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1818

In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,

Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:15-mc-00369)

Submitted: December 15, 2022 Decided: December 19, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge and WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1818 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/19/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s order returning her pleadings 

because the pleadings did not comply with the prefiling injunction and did not state a 

plausible cause of action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1818 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Docket ID FEMA-2024-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2308]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations, which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports for Rock County, Minnesota and Incorporated Areas.

# DATES:

This withdrawal is effective February 23, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

                        You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2308, to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email)                         *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email)                         *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On February 23, 2023, FEMA published a proposed notice at 88 FR 11457, proposing flood hazard determinations for Rock County, Minnesota and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing the proposed notice.

*Authority:*42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.                

Nicholas A. Shufro,

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.

[FR Doc. 2024-03725 Filed 2-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
Exhibit 21.1

IPALCO ENTERPRISES, INC.

Subsidiaries of the Company

 

```

List of Subsidiaries                                                 State in Which Organized
-------------------------------------------------------------------  ------------------------
Subsidiaries of IPALCO Enterprises, Inc.

  Indianapolis Power & Light Company (IPL)                           Indiana

    Subsidiaries of IPL
       IPL Funding Corporation                                       Indiana
       Tecumseh Coal Corporation                                     Missouri

  Mid-America Capital Resources, Inc. (Mid-America)                  Indiana

    Subsidiaries of Mid-America
       Indianapolis Campus Energy, Inc. (ICE)                        Indiana
       Store Heat and Produce Energy, Inc. (SHAPE)                   Indiana
       Mid-America Energy Resources, Inc. (Energy Resources)         Indiana
       Cleveland Thermal Energy Corporation                          Ohio
       Cleveland District Cooling Corporation                        Ohio

  Remittance Processing Services, LLC                                Indiana
```

 

IPALCO Enterprises, Inc. owns all of the outstanding common stock of both IPL and Mid-America,and owns 50% of Remittance Processing Services, LLC.  Each of the subsidiaries listed for IPL andMid-America is wholly owned except for:  SHAPE, which is 80% owned by Mid-America and Tecumseh CoalCorporation which is 50% owned by IPL.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ralph del Campo, certify that:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.
|  
|3.
|  
|4.

|   
|---
|(a)
|   
|(b)
|   
|(c)
|   
|(d)

|  
|--
|5.

|   
|---
|(a)
|   
|(b)

|               |  |                                                                    
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|March 16, 2011 |  | /s/ Ralph del Campo                                                
|               |  |                                                                    
|               |  | Ralph del CampoChief Operating Officer(Principal Executive Officer)



---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for fiscal ended DEC-31-98
</LEGEND>

<S>                             		<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   	12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>        	DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>	JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                     	DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                   	76204
<SECURITIES>                        	0
<RECEIVABLES>                    	1761262
<ALLOWANCES>                   	0
<INVENTORY>                       	1828240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>          	5171486
<PP&E>                                  	1777164
<DEPRECIATION>                   	1241053
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    	5744331
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>       	2454635
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                               	42984
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY> 	0
<PREFERRED>                            	0
<OTHER-SE>                          	3171712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	5744331
<SALES>                                   9887578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         	9887578
<CGS>                                 	6208419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   	6208419
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              	0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    	0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                	51256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    	750747
<INCOME-TAX>                          	(80000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 	830747
<DISCONTINUED>                      	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 	0
<CHANGES>                          	0
<NET-INCOME>                          	830747
<EPS-BASIC>                          	.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                        	.20


</TABLE>
Docket Number FAA-2014-0146
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,983,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,983,571
<PP&E>                                     189,875,741
<DEPRECIATION>                             189,692,528
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,166,784
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,983,571
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,213
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,166,784
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,727
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  398,134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (317,407)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Billy Joe Waldroup, Appellant

No. 06-15-00062-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 44403-B). 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, 

Justice Moseley and Justice Burgess 

participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the $1,062.50 

assessment of attorney fees. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Billy Joe Waldroup, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 2, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.2

The Coast Distribution System, Inc.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the Year ended December 31, 2007,

as Amended on Form 10-K/A

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the Annual Report
on Form 10-K, of The Coast Distribution System, Inc. (the Company), for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and as amended by this Amendment on Form 10-K/A (the
Annual Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 28, 2008



/s/ SANDRA A. KNELLSandra A. Knell Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Coast Distribution System, Inc. and will be retained by The Coast Distribution System,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Security Bancorp, Inc. (the "First
      Security") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, R. Douglas Hutcherson, President and Chief Executive Officer of First
      Security, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of First Security.





Date: November
                14, 2005
              By:
              /s/ R.
                Douglas HutchersonR.
                Douglas HutchersonPresident
                and Chief Execuive Officer




















(The
      balance of this page is intentionally left blank)
















Page
      28
Opinion issued April 3, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 13
- 00 699
- C V

——————————— UMAWA IMO , Appellant

V. PRINCE UCHECHI NWAKANMA AND PRINCE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. , Appellee s
On Appeal from the 270th Dis trict Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2012
- 32324

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Umawa Imo , has filed an agreed motion to dismiss. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued . M ore than 10 days have passed and no party has responded to the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).2

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42. 2 (a) , 43.2(f) . We dismiss all other pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle

.
Exhibit 32.1(*)
   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Subrah S. Iyar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  
  Date: November 8, 2004
 
  /s/ SUBRAH S. IYAR
 Subrah S. Iyar
 Chief Executive Officer
   
  
   
   _____________________________
   (*) In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Managements Reports on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.2 is deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.