alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 15**

Awareness Letter from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

July 27, 2006 

Armstrong Holdings, Inc. 

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 

Re: Registration Statement No. 333-74501; 33-91890; 33-18996; 33-18997; 33-65768; 333-79093;333-43872 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 27, 2006related to our review of interim financial information of Armstrong Holdings, Inc. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the“Act”), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm withinthe meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of JSCE, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Moore, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/PATRICK J. MOOREPatrick J. Moore
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|March 3, 2004                                                                       | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to JSCE, Inc. and will be retained by JSCE, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
================================================================================

EXHIIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Dated:  December 13, 2006          /s/ Mark Hlady
                                 ----------------------
                                 Name: Mark  Haldy
                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Buford SPIGENER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30004.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1958.

Stein, Bennett & Shepley, Plouston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is unlawfully carrying arms; the punishment, a fine of $150.

This prosecution was brought under art. 483, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., as amended in 1957. The information, omitting the formal parts, reads as follows: “* * * did then and there carry on or about his person a hand chain.” No statement of facts accompanies the record but appellant vigorously contends that the portion of the act under which he was prosecuted is unintelligible and inoperative.

In Ex parte Chernosky, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 52, 217 S.W.2d 673, this Court said: “A statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must guess as to its meaning and differ as to its application, lacks the first essential of due process of law.”

The State relies entirely upon the recent opinion of this Court in Curson v. State, 313 S.W.2d 538, in which we upheld a conviction under this article for carrying a night stick.

The distinction between Curson and the case at bar lies in the fact that a night stick is such a well recognized term as to be defined in several dictionaries, such as American College and Webster’s Unabridged, while we find no definition for *833“hand chain”. Since the term is not well recognized that portion of said article is “of such doubtful construction that it cannot be understood” and is therefore inoperative by virtue of the due process clause of both state and federal constitutions. U. S. Constitution, Amendment 14; Vernon’s Ann. Constitution of Texas, art. 1, Sec. 19.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
EXHIBIT 23.3

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements of National Home Health Care Corp. on Forms S-8,  (Registration  Nos.
033-61315 and  333-46076)  of our report dated October 3, 2000,  with respect to
the  consolidated  financial  statements of National Home Health Care Corp.  and
subsidiaries  as of July 31,  2000 and for the two years then ended  included in
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2000.

HOLTZ RUBENSTEIN & CO., LLP
Melville, New York
October 3, 2000
*Circuit Judge of the 8th Circuit, sitting by designation.

**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 00-31487 c/w 01-30410

JOY CORTINAS, Individually and on behalf of her minor son, Edward

Michael Cortinas,

Plaintiff - Appellant - Cross-Appellee,

VERSUS

HIGHWAY TRANSPORT, INC; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants - Appellees,

FLYING J, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee - Cross-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans

(00-CV-1661-M)

 November 26, 2001 

Before KING, Chief Judge, DAVIS, Circuit Judge, and MAGILL*,

District Judge.

PER CURIAM:**

After reviewing the record and considering the briefs and

argument of counsel we are satisfied that the district court

correctly dismissed this suit against Flying J on grounds that
2

Flying J owed no legal duty to Mr. Cortinas that was breached.

Essentially for the reasons assigned by the district court, we

therefore affirm the dismissal of this action against Flying J but

decline to impose sanctions against Ms. Cortinas.

With respect to the action by Cortinas against Highway

Transport and Liberty Mutual, counsel advised us at argument that

Cortinas workers’ compensation action was resolved by the

Louisiana Office of Workers’ Compensation. The workers’

compensation judge granted Highway Transport and Liberty Mutual’s

Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissed the workers’ compensation

action against those parties. Cortinas lodged an appeal to the

Louisiana Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and argument was

heard on their appeal on November 6, 2001. In view of the progress

of this litigation in the state court, we conclude that it is

prudent to allow the state court to interpret its workers’

compensation statute. To accomplish this result, we therefore

vacate the judgment of the district court dismissing this action

against Highway Transport and Liberty Mutual and remand this case

with directions to stay Cortinas’ action against these parties

pending resolution of the worker’s compensation action disposition

by the Louisiana appellate courts.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART AND REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of BOE Financial Services of
Virginia, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of his knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2005, and for the periods then ended.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|                             
|/s/    George M. Longest, Jr.
|George M. Longest, Jr.       
|Chief Executive Officer      
|                             
|/s/    Bruce E. Thomas       
|Bruce E. Thomas              
|Chief Financial Officer      



May 11, 2005



Page: 19
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.9

                  FORGIVENESS OF DEBT AND CANCELLATION OF NOTE

         Pursuant to Section 2.2 of that certain Exchange and Stock Issuance
Agreement between Bionova Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and Savia, S.A. de C.V., a corporation organized under the laws of
the United Mexican States ("Savia"), dated March 29, 2004 (the "Exchange
Agreement"), Savia hereby forgives $53,033,424.84 of the principal amount of
that certain $55,459,743.57 principal amount Promissory Note of the Company,
dated December 30, 2002 (the "Bionova Note"), and all accrued and unpaid
interest thereon.

         Further, the Company and Savia acknowledge that the Exchange and the
Debt Forgiveness, as those terms are defined in the Exchange Agreement, have
been consummated and, as a result thereof and pursuant to Section 2.3 of the
Exchange Agreement, Savia herewith surrenders the original copy of the Bionova
Note to the Company for cancellation, and the Company hereby cancels the Bionova
Note.

         Dated:   March 29, 2004


                              SAVIA, S.A. de C.V.


                              By:  /s/ Alfonso Romo
                                   -------------------------------
                              Name:    Alfonso Romo
                              Title:   Chief Executive Officer


                              BIONOVA HOLDING CORPORATION


                              By:  /s/ Jose Manuel Garcia
                                   ----------------------------
                              Name:    Jose Manuel Garcia
                              Title:   Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
31.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
   I, Guido
DiGregorio, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Communication Intelligence
Corporation;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;
  (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
  5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date: May
9, 2008
  /s/
Guido DiGregorio
 Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tvia, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Eli Porat, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

         (1)
         the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
         certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
         with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

         (2)
         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.

Dated: February 7, 2003             /s/   Eli Porat
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Eli Porat
                                    Chief Executive Officer and President

                                       28
---

EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Garth Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of AMG
Oil Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AMG Oil Ltd. for the
period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that the information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: May 11, 2007

/s/Garth
Johnson
Garth Johnson, Chief Financial Officer

---
#### Clarence MURRAY, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28613.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 21, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of paraphernalia adapted for the use of narcotic drugs, in violation of Art. 725b, Sec. 2, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, four years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bruce E. Thomas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BOE Financial Services of
Virginia, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006



By:

/s/ Bruce E. ThomasBruce E. ThomasSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer




Page: 21
EPA Testimonyfor May24, 2012

Good Afternoon Ladies and Gentlemen. My name is Dawud Ummah and I'm here from the great State of Maine and a member ofthe Portland, Maine Branch ofthe NAACP. I've served10 years in the U.S. Air Force 1981-1991, with 8 months of service in the Persian GulfWar. Once Igot out ofthe military. I made a decision that Iwas going to earn my living with less destruction to the planet that we all must share less pollution to include air, water and environment that 

### I'm living in, and less violence to myfellow citizens. I moved back Maine after my militaryservice was completed. I began farming to grow healthyfood vs. killing people that I didn't know. Iwanted to developfarm propertyvs. destroying property and creating pollutingthe environment. Ijoined organizations and started to workwith those organizations that have these issues atthe heart of the workthey mission. Such Organizations as the NAACP Portland Branch, Cumberland County Extension, Maine's Veterans for Peace, The Nature Conservancy, The Biodiversity Research Institution and educated Ecology. These organizations are working directly and indirectlyto reverse the effects ofthecarbon pollution and create greenjobs now and forthe future. We knowthat when we start cleaning up the industrial carbon pollution, which had started this global warmingwe will spark innovation in clean technologies and create more American jobs to produce, install, and operate these newtechnologies. That has a direct impact on our health and local economies. We knowthat car emissions and otherthings contribute to carbon pollution. However, carbon pollution from coal-fired power plants is largelythe blame forthe climate change thatthreatens Maine's outdoor heritage and qualityof life. Every year, power plants dump morethan 2 billion tons ofdangerous carbon pollution and other pollutants intothe air. While African-American, immigrants and refugees from Africa and countries ofcolor normallyfind ourselves living on and around chemicals toxic land fill in and around the Portland area where I reside, The Bayside and Riverton Parks area of Portland is where a large amount ofthis resettling is taking place. Maine has some ofthe highest rates ofasthma the country. Approximately: 10% of Maine adult currently have asthma compared to 7.8% nationally 10.7% of Maine's children have asthma compared to 8.9% nationallyAnd 16.5% of Maine's non-white population has asthma and affects about 128,000 people in ourstate including 23.000 children. This has a big impact on life in our communities. It is estimated that asthma
causes about 65,000 school absences and 37,500work absences each year. Why does Maine have such high rates? Maine is geographically located in what is commonlythe "tail-pipe" of the United States. Environmental pollutant's carried by air patterns lead to high levels ofair borne particulate, smog, smoke and soot. Maine is subject to high levels ofsummertime ozone. Maine is a densely forested state with high pollen levels. The people of Maine still rely heavily on burningwood to heat their homes. Dawud Ummah dawud.ummah@maine.edu