alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1510 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit a pat down search 

of minor for purposes of air transportation security without the consent 

and presence of a parent of the minor, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2011 

Mr. CHAFFETZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit a pat 

down search of minor for purposes of air transportation 

security without the consent and presence of a parent 

of the minor, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TSA Screening of Mi5 nors Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1510 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PAT DOWN SEARCHES OF MINORS 

2 WITHOUT THE CONSENT AND PRESENCE OF 

3 PARENT. 

4 Section 44901 of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by striking so much as precedes the first 

7 sentence and inserting the following: 

8 ‘‘(b) SCREENING OF PASSENGERS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) SUPERVISION OF SCREENING.—’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(2) SCREENING OF MINORS.— 

13 ‘‘(A) PROHIBITION.—A screening of a pas14 senger who is a minor may not include a pat 

15 down search of the passenger unless such 

16 search— 

17 ‘‘(i) is conducted with the consent, 

18 and in the presence, of a parent of the 

19 minor; or 

20 ‘‘(ii) in the case of a minor who is not 

21 accompanied by a parent, is conducted in 

22 the presence of a representative of the air 

23 carrier or foreign air carrier undertaking 

24 to provide air transportation or foreign air 

25 transportation, respectively, for which the 

26 search is conducted. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1510 IH

1 ‘‘(B) PARENT DEFINED.—In this para2 graph the term ‘parent’ includes a person who 

3 is authorized to act in loco parentis for pur4 poses of providing consent with respect to a pat 

5 down search under this section.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION



I, Robert W. McMartin, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB of Circuit Research Labs, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably



---

likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 18, 2005.



/s/ Robert W. McMartin

Robert W. McMartin

Chief Financial Officer
#### Ex parte Leon (Leo Danile) MARTINEZ.

No. 28682.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Henry Wade, Criminal Dist. Atty., George P. Blackburn, Harvey Lindsayj

Beth J.. Wright, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas» and .Leon B.. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austip,, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The appeal is from an order.entered in a habeas corpus proceeding wherein appellant was remanded to, custody to be returrn-ed to the State of Wisconsin.

The return of the sheriff on the writ of. habeas corpus issued June 13, 1956, show.ed that appellant was in custody under authority of an Executive Warrant.

The judgment remanding appellant for extradition was'entered on June 14, 1956; after a hearing, and -notice of appeal was given the same day. •;

The statement of facts relating to the hearing was filed in the trial court on September 13, 1956. It cannot be considered' for -the reason that it was not filed within 90 days after giving notice of appeal. .

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Loren Moll, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                            /s/  Loren Moll
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Loren Moll
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
May 19, 2008
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

The Board of Directors 

AmericanWest Bancorporation 

We consent to incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement numbers, 333-101040, 333-95989, 333-72834, 333-65628, 333-65630, and 333-58511, on Forms S-8 of AmericanWest Bancorporation of our report dated March 8, 2006, relating to the consolidated statement of financial conditionof AmericanWest Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the three years ended December 31,2005, and in our same report, with respect to AmericanWest Bancorporation management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reportis included in this annual report on Form 10-K of AmericanWest Bancorporation for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/    Moss Adams LLP 

Everett, Washington 

March 8, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William S. Tighe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated:  August 13, 2010
By:
/s/ William S. TigheWilliam S. TigheChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)










CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results

of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated:  August 13, 2010
By:
/s/ David A. WilsonDavid A. WilsonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### Fred HAMMERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28037.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the sale of whisky in a dry area; the punishment, 60 days in jail and a fine of $500.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **Section
        1350 Certifications**
  Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of IsoRay, Inc., a Minnesota
        corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:
  To
        my
        knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual
        period
        ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
        contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
        September 28, 2007
 
 /s/
                  Roger E. GirardROGER
                    E. GIRARDCHIEF
                    EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 Dated:
        September 28, 2007
 /s/
                  Jonathan R. HuntJONATHAN
                    R. HUNTCHIEF
                      FINANCIAL
                      OFFICER
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 9, 2009

1215 

# Order

January 9, 2009

137471

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137471 COA: 285294 Saginaw CC: 98-015912-FC KYALL WILLIAM ALDRICH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 28, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

H ATHAWAY 

### , J., not participating.
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**             Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of Diamond Triumph Auto Glass, Inc.(the “Company”) herebycertifies that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter endedJune 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated: August 15, 2005   /s/ Douglas Boyle             Douglas Boyle      Chief Financial Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompanythe Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filedfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardlessof any general incorporation language in such filing.
-2-
#### Carl JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28013.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1956.

Desmond E. Gay, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The offense is burglary with a prior conviction for an offense of like character alleged for the purpose of enhancement; the punishment, twelve years in the penitentiary.

The state’s witness, Glauser, testified that a building which he owned and occupied was entered, while it was closed, by someone without his consent by removing a screen and forcing a window open; and that several blank checks which were in a desk in the building were taken,which he identified at the trial as State’s Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.

Two witnesses for thé state identified appellant as being the person who came into their places of business,-introduced himself as Jerry Perlitz and presented identification papers indicating that he was such person and passed checks to them which they identified as the checks which were marked State’s Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.

*664Proof was offered.that the name of the appellant was Carl Jackson.

It was stipulated that appellant was the same person who was convicted in the prior case alleged.

Appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in his behalf. ■

We find the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing appointed counsel time to prepare his defense which deprived him of his- liberty without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Bill of Exception No. 1 reveals that on July 19, 1955, the Judge of. the Criminal District Court of Harris County appointed an attorney to represent appellant and advised him that the case was set for trial that day, at which time the appointed attorney orally requested the court to reset the case in order to allow him time to malee an investigation and prepare a defense, which request was denied.

The Judge of the Criminal District Court of Harris County qualified said bill as follows: that he had no recollection of any request for a postponement being made; that on the day of the appointment he transferred said cause to Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County, and had no knowledge of the procedure followed upon the trial of that court; and that no objection ■was made to any action of the court prior to the transfer of the case.

’• The proof in the statement of facts does not reveal any defense.

The judgment reveals that when this case was called in Criminal District Court No. 2, appellant announced ready for trial. It is not shown that any motion for a postponement or a continuance was- duly presented. Under this record, it appears that appellant is in no position to complain that he was placed on trial at the time" the case was called. 12 Tex.Jur. 618, Sec. 285; King v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 572, 176 S.W.2d 954.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT*

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          NAME                          STATE OF INCORPORATION
                          ----                          ----------------------
<S>                                                     <C>
        Subsidiaries Incorporated in the United
        States..................................
        ----------------------------------------

        C/P Products Corp.....................                 Indiana

        United Sales and Warehouse of Texas, Inc.              Texas

        Foreign Subsidiaries:
        ---------------------

        The Coast Distribution System (Canada) Inc.            Quebec, Canada
</TABLE>

----------

*      In accordance with the descriptions set forth in Paragraph (b) of Item
       601 of Regulation S-K, there have been omitted those subsidiaries that,
       if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not
       constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 1999.
#### Rosie LAWRENCE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28475.

Court of Criminal Appeals of' Texas.

June 30, 1956.

■No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Possessing beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area’ is the offense, with punishment assessed at a fine of $150’.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed, and no motion for rehearing will be entertained in this case. • ' '
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC MERCANTILE BANCORP

Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q

for the quarter ended September 30, 2010

The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/    RAYMOND E. DELLERBA                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|                        |  |  |  | Raymond E. Dellerba,                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                      
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Paving Stone
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Jace
Simmons,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)     The  Form  10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The  information  contained  in  the  Form  10-Q fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      /s/ Jace Simmons
                                      -----------------
                                       Jace Simmons
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       August 14, 2002