alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ace Orist MILES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28529.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 31, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record' on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty-., Aüstin, for the State.

PER CURIAM:

The offense is rape; the punishment, 99 years in the penitentiary.

. The record on appeal contains no statement of facts - or bills of exception. All proceedings appear-to.be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
November 27, 2006 

Mr. Doug Schneider 

Air Quality Programs 

Washington State Department of Ecology 

PO Box 47600 

Olympia, WA 98504-7600 

Dear Mr. Schneider: 

Enclosed are copies of the complete final version of the Vancouver Portion of the Portland-Vancouver 

Ozone Maintenance Plan. This plan was adopted by the Southwest Clean Air Board of Directors and 

approved for inclusion into the Washington State Implementation Plan at their meeting held on 

November 2, 2006 As you know, Ecology held its SIP hearing here at the Southwest Clean Air Agency 

offices on the same day. 

This plan demonstrates the Portland-Vancouver AQMA will maintain compliance with the 8-hour ozone 

standard through 2015. I have also enclosed an Addendum to Appendix 3 – Emission Inventory Detail 

for your reference. 

 Please forward this Plan with Ecology’s SIP hearing information to the Environmental Protection 

Agency for their approval. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Laurie Hulse-Moyer 

Air Quality Scientist 

Enclosures
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Diane Bjorkstrom, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Tvia, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresas of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: November 11, 2004    /s/ Diane Bjorkstrom  Diane Bjorkstrom Chief Financial Officerand Vice President,Administration
The Honorable Jackie W. St. Clair OpinionNo. H-897

Commissioner Texas Department of Labor and Re: Authority of the Standards Department of Labor and P. 0. Box 12157, Capitol Station Standards to make special Austin, Texas 78711 boiler inspectionsand charge a fee therefor.
Dear Commissioner St. Clair:
You have requested our opinion regarding the authority of the Department of Labor and Standards to make special boiler inspectionsand to charge a fee therefor. You state that, since 1~969, the Departmenthas been conducting "shop surveys" for boilermanufacturers to enable suchmanufacturers to obtain certificationby theAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers. The Departmenthas been charging for this service a fee of $60.00per half day and $100.00per full day, plus travel and per diem expenses of the inspectors. The Texa.s

Boiler InspectionLaw, article 5221c,V.T.C.S., authorizes the Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Standards to inspect certain steam boilers and to promulgate "rulesand regulations

. . . for the construction, installation, use, maintenance and operation of steam boilers and appurtenances.thereof." Sections 4, 6. Furthermore, the Commissioner is required thereby to fix and collect fees for such inspections, not to exceed $15.00. Section 12. The statutedoes not, however, provide for the inspectionof boilermanufacturers,nor authorize a fee therefor.
We understand a "shop survey" to be a general inspection of the plant and machinery of a boilermanufacturer, including an evaluationof the qualificationsof its employees.

p. 3770The Honorable JackieW. St. Clair - page 2 (H-897)

It is well established that an administrativeagency has only those powers expresslygranted to it by statute and those necessarily implied therefrom. San Antonio, StaufferIk.oEit;ioz$

344 S.W.2d 158 (Tex.Sup 1961). I article 5221~ cannot be construed to authorize the Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Standards to conduct "shop surveys"of boilermanufacturers and to charge a fee for such inspections. We do not consideror decide the question of whether the Departmentof Labor as Standardsmight properly conduct a more narrow inspectiondirected at boilers being constructed in the shops of manufacturers.
SUMMARY The Department of Labor and Standards is not authorizedunder article 5221c, V.T.C.S., to conduct "shop surveys" of boilermanufacturersand to charge a fee therefor.

L. HILL ' Attorney General of Texas

DAVID M._KENDALL, First Assistant

Opinion Committee jwb

p. 3771
EXHIBIT 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

(Annual Report on Form 10-K)

The undersigned, an officer and/or director of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., constitutes and appoints Nicholas Konidaris, Paul Oldham and Kerry
Mustoe, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts and things and execute in his or her name as an officer or director of the Company the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3,
2010 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm all that said
attorneys and agents and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Any one of said attorneys or agents shall have, and may exercise, all powers conferred.

Dated: May 12, 2010.



/s/ FREDERICK A. BALLFrederick A. Ball
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 2**  **299**

DEREK N. JARVIS , Plaintiff

- Appell ant ,

v.
STAPLES, INCORPORATED , Defendant

- Appell ee .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Ma ryland , at Greenbelt

. Peter J. Messitte , Senior District Judge. ( 8: 10

- cv - 0 02 44

- PJM )

Submitted : April 28, 2011 Decided: May 2, 2011

Before DAVI S , KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Derek N. Jarvis , A ppellant Pro Se. Reenah Kim, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C. , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Derek N. Jarvis appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his civil action alleging discrim ination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. Staples, Inc. , No. 8:10

- cv - 00244

- PJM (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2010)

. We dispense with oral argument because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Clean Highly Efficient Decarbonized Engines

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 4, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Clean Highly Efficient 
Decarbonized Engines (``CHEDE-9'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture 
and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances.
    Pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: Afton Chemical, Richmond, VA; Caterpillar, Inc., 
Peoria, IL; Deere and Company, Cedar Falls, IA; Eaton, Marshall, MI; 
Isuzu, Tokyo, JAPAN; Superturbo Technologies, Loveland, CO; Tenneco, 
Plymouth, MI; Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft, Wolfsburg, GERMANY; Volvo 
Powertrain North America, Hagerstown, MD; WABTEC, Pittsburgh, PA; 
Weichai Power Co. Ltd., Shandong, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Yuchai, 
Guangxi, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Toyota Industries Corporation, 
Aichi, JAPAN; and HD Hyundai Infracore, Incheon, KOREA. The general 
area of CHEDE-9's planned activity is to develop new and novel 
technologies that provide clean and efficient decarbonized powertrain 
solutions; to provide a collaborative environment for evaluation of 
advanced decarbonized engine and aftertreatment technology to meet the 
goals of GHG emissions of 35% to 50% below model year 2024 products and 
NOx to remain below one part per million at the tailpipe.

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-02262 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1556 

To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to allow certain land to 

be used to generate income to provide funding for academic programs, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2011 

Mr. LUJA ́N introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Indian Advancement Act to allow 

certain land to be used to generate income to provide 

funding for academic programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND USE. 

4 Section 824(a) of the Omnibus Indian Advancement 

5 Act (Public Law 106–568) is amended to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(a) LIMITATION FOR EDUCATIONAL, HEALTH, CUL7 TURAL, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES.—The 

8 land taken into trust under section 823(a) shall be used 

9 solely for the educational, health, or cultural purposes of 


sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1556 IH

1 the Santa Fe Indian School and economic development 

2 projects that provide funding for such purposes.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William S. Tighe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition

and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated:  May 13, 2011
By:
/s/ William S. TigheWilliam S. TigheChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                     0
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           0
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 16,525
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 734
<OTHER-SE>                             2,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               0
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       2,789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    ( 19,614)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        ( 19,314)
<EPS-BASIC>                           (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.00)



</TABLE>
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

APPLE INC.,

Appellant

v.

UNILOC 2017 LLC,

Appellee

______________________

2019-1636

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-

01993.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

MICHAEL T. PIEJA, Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan 

& Baum LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALAN ERNST LITTMANN, DOUG J. WINNARD. 

 BRIAN MATTHEW KOIDE, Etheridge Law Group, Southlake, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES 

ETHERIDGE, RYAN S. LOVELESS, BRETT MANGRUM. 

 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 19-1636 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 03/09/2020
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

 PER CURIAM (REYNA, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

March 9, 2020 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 19-1636 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 03/09/2020
# I
7/21’/’7 SECTION 42

— OPEN BURNIN_G
42.1 No person shall cause, suffer, allow,or permit the burning ofany combustible material in any open fire except as provided in this Section and then only when such burning has been approved In advance by the Control Officer. Such excep tions are as follows:

- 42.1.1 When in thejudgmentofthe Control Officer, no othor safe method for the disposal ofcombustible, explosive.or dangerous material exists or can re— sonably be obtained; 42.1.2 Small fires for recreational, educational, cere monial, cooking purposes andwarmth ofhuman beings, including barbecues and outdoor fireplaces provided they do not create a public nuisance; 42.1.3 Where fire is set eitherby officçrs ofgovernmental agencies, In performance oftheirofficial duties or for the purposes oftraining and instruction of fire—fighting and fire—rescue personnel; 42.1.4 Outside the Las Vegas Valley, when such fire is set on a.field used for growing crops in the course of disposing ofunused portions ofa crop and inter mingled weeds resultlng from an agriculture operation; 42.1.5 Domestic burning 

### oitmaterial originating on premises, exclusive ofgarbage, at a property used exclusively as aprivate residence or dwelling where there is no collection service available for such material.

Nothing in this section.shall be construed to pro hibitormake unlawful the Construction and use_of private barbecue pits, grills, oroutdoor fireplaces for the preparation offood for consumption by lndiv1d’aIs nor shll any permit from the Control Officer be terefor. 42.4 Open burning shall be prohibited during air pollu— tion episode conditions as defined in Section 6 of the Implementation Plan for the State ofNevada entitled, EFIERGENCY EPISODE PLAN.
#### Willie Swindell PAYNE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28699.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 12, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*547PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
0109 

fson, Eric· -FS <egustafson @fs.fed.us> 

, August 03, 2012 12:40 PM 

ny, Dennis (OST) 

ment on Rhinelander essential air service proposals 

jet service. Fewer scheduled flights often means longer, more inconvenient itineraries and sometimes precludes getting to 

 

udies 

166 

ustafs,xt 

c':-:-';.:i 

\..;,..! 

u 

a 

. .J 

ns information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interceptionofthis 

e of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you 

message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately. 

1
**EXHIBIT 99.02**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, DavidGoldfarb, certify that:

 

1.                                       The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscalyear ended November 30, 2002 (the “Report”) of Lehman Brothers Inc. (the“Company”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date:                    February 28, 2003 |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                      |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                      |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                      |   | /s/ DAVID  GOLDFARB |
|                                                                                                                                      |   | David GoldfarbChief Financial Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





*Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report), Dean
      Antonis, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,
      that:





(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Dean AntonisDean
                AntonisTreasurer
                and Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerDate:
                November 15, 2006








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.