alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,023
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              39
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                17,575
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    132,046
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        493,627
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 682,354
<DEPOSITS>                                     579,396
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,790
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,016
<LONG-TERM>                                     39,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,729
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 682,354
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,896
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,230
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    69
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,195
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,912
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,684
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,511
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      382
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,080
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,356
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,356
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.16
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,753
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,023
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        4
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,402
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             6,402
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### William P. ANDERSON v. STATE.

No. 28756.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1957.

C. C. Divine, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady and Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction, on a plea of guilty before the court, is for the unlawful sale of whisky in a wet area without a permit; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The same question is raised here as in Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.R., 297 S.W.2d 679, this day decided contrary to appellant’s contention.

The judgment is affirmed.
**SECTION 302**CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael Hart, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AMG Oil Ltd.; 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this interim report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; and 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this interim report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this interim report.

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

    a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

    b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)    presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.    I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

    a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and

6.    I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 14th day of August, 2003.

BY:
/s/ Michael Hart                        Michael Hart, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer**
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01572**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 01572\01572_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 01572\01572_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01572\01572_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 01572\01572_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01572\01572_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01572\01572_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01572\01572_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 01572\01572_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 01572\Certification Statement Plant ID 01572.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_IPL's Response to EPA ICR_IPL_091510.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS A5-3 WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS D2-3 Ash Pond Retention Time Study.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 01572\Supplemental Documents\01572_PCS D3-1 D-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18A2047. LESTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR INDUSTRY

FOR THE BLIND et al.

We have reviewed the briefs and record in this case. Because no reversible

error appears to exist and the establishment of precedent is not desirable, the appeal

is hereby DISMISSED as improvidently granted. See Court of Appeals Rule 31 (b).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

February 07, 2019

02/07/2019
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-2226 and 333-98989 of SafeGuard Health Enterprises, Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated March 13, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph referring to a change in method of accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets in 2002), appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of SafeGuard Health Enterprises, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2002.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE llp

Costa Mesa, California
March 21, 2003



<PAGE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                            PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Catuity,
Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report") for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14b or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.

Michael V. Howe, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and John H. Lowry,
the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, each certifies that, to the best of
his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Date: August 9, 2004

                                       /s/ Michael V. Howe
                                       -------------------
                                       Michael V. Howe
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       /s/ John H. Lowry
                                       -----------------
                                       John H. Lowry
                                       Chief Financial Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  INCLUDED  IN  THE  ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
     YEAR  ENDED 12-31-98  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000726512
<NAME>                        SCIOS INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            6,683
<SECURITIES>                                     90,628
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 37,413
<PP&E>                                           71,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (38,827)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  138,829
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            29,310
<BONDS>                                          34,573
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             38
<OTHER-SE>                                       74,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    138,829
<SALES>                                          29,101
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 73,715
<CGS>                                            16,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    85,706
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (12,444)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.06)
        


</TABLE>
#### Conception YBARRA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27868.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1955.

.No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty.; Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Selling béer in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $600.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
(Exhibit 10.42)

                               XYNERGY CORPORATION

                                  (Letterhead)

Via Facsimile (561) 487-5766

June 24, 2004

Weinberg & Company, PA
6100 Glades Road, Suite 314
Boca Raton, Florida 33434

Re:   Letter to SEC re 8K, Item 4. Section (b) - THIRD REQUEST

Dear Sir or Madam:

Your recent letter does not respond to our question regarding accounting
principals. In order to simplify matters we have fashioned a yes or no
questionnaire. Please fill it out and fax it back to us at (310) 274-0161 and
(760) 432-6133.

b) In connection with the audits of the Company's financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2003 and through the subsequent period ended as of the
date of this report, there were no disagreements ("Disagreements") as defined in
Item 304 (a) (1) (iv) and the instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-K, as
amended, promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Regulation
S-K") with Weinberg on any matters of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope and procedure which, if not
resolved to the satisfaction of Weinberg, would have caused Weinberg to make
reference to the matter in its reports. In addition, during the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000 and through the subsequent period ended as of the
date of this report, there were no reportable events ("Reportable Events") as
defined in Item 304 (a) (1) (v) of Regulation S-K. The Company has requested
that Weinberg furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange
Commission, stating whether it agrees with the above statements, a copy of which
is attached as Exhibit 10.39.

        ______Yes                                            ________No

TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE, PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS AT YOUR EARLIEST  CONVENIENCE.


XYNERGY CORPORATION


/s/
-----------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC
MERCANTILE BANCORP

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the
Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this
Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  | 
|Date: May 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ NANCY A. GRAY
|                  |  |  |  |                   |  |  |  | Nancy A. Gray, Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                  |  |  |  |                  
|                  |  |  |  |                   |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission on its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

June 30, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-60800 Summary Calendar

DARRELL GLENN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF COLUMBUS, MISSISSIPPI; ET AL,

Defendants,

CITY OF COLUMBUS, MISSISSIPPI; LOWNDES COUNTY MISSISSIPPI,

DefendantsAppellees.

------------------------------------------------------ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:01-CV-235-D

-------------------------------------------------------

Before DAVIS, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Darrell Glenn appeals the district court’s final judgment granting the defendants’ motions for

summary judgment and dismissing the case with prejudice.-2-

Glenn argues that there are issues of material fact as to whether the city of Columbus is liable

for his arrest without probable cause. Glenn’s complaint raised a wrongful arrest claim against only

the individual defendant who was voluntarily dismissed and not against Columbus. This court will

not consider an issue based on a theory that Glenn did not assert in the district court. See Levertte

v. Louisville Ladder Co. , 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir. 1999).

G lenn argues that Columbus’ use of a master bond schedule is a violation of the Eighth

Amendment’s Excessive Bail Clause. Glenn additionally argues that the requiring him to pay 10%

of the bail amount to a bail bondsman without allo wing him the opportunity to be heard by an

impartial officer violates the Due Process Clause.

Because it was used in conjunction with other meaningful alternatives provided by the relevant

Mississippi statutes, Columbus’ use of the bond schedule does not violate the Excessive Bail Clause.

See Pugh v. Rainwater

, 572 F.2d 1053, 1057 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc). For similar reasons,

Columbus’ use of the bond schedule does not violate the Due Process Clause. S ee Pugh

, 572 F.2d

at 1057. Mississippi provides that, upon arrest for a misdemeanor, an arrestee may demand to appear

before a judicial officer; however, Glenn made no such demand. See M ISS

. C ODE A NN

.

§ 99-3-18(1). The defendants were not required to provide Glenn with a hearing before a judicial

officer immediately upon the completion of b o o king during the early morning hours on a Sunday,

when such an official was not readily available. See County of Riverside v. McLaughlin

, 500 U.S.

44, 56-57 (1991). Accordingly, there was no denial of due process.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99.3

                             CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer conducted an evaluation of the Company's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report on
Form 10-QSB. Based on that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined that such
controls and procedures are designed to ensure that material information
relating to the Company, is made known to them, particularly during the period
in which this Form 10-QSB was being prepared. There have been no significant
changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their
evaluation.
In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMG Oil Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of February, 2005.

| | /s/ Michael Hart                                                         
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                          
| | Michael Hart 
Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
| |