alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued October 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00180-CR

———————————

RICARDO ORDONEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1399320

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Ricardo Ordonez, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of 

aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years of age.

1

The trial court found 

appellant guilty and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain 

 

1

See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.021(a)(1)(B)(i), (a)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2014).
2

agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 35 years’ imprisonment. Acting 

pro se, appellant filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction.

A plea bargain case is one in which “a defendant's plea was guilty or nolo 

contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by 

the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). In a 

plea bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were raised by 

written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s 

permission to appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 2006); 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing 

that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. 

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the 

defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record 

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss 

this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A 

court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who 
3

plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited 

appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,453,935               2,453,935
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,610,255               1,610,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                    49,000                  49,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,364,737               5,364,737
<PP&E>                                         772,921                 772,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                 578,015                 578,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,160,188               6,160,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,511,368               2,511,368
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           79,430                  79,430
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     2,235,674               2,235,674
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,841                  15,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,160,188               6,160,188
<SALES>                                      2,411,718              10,225,676
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,411,718              10,225,676
<CGS>                                        1,405,890               6,178,286
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,264,834              12,225,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (30,653)                (88,777)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,253                 153,765
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                143,284             (2,064,615)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    59,584               (843,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,700             (1,221,615)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,700             (1,221,615)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00                  (1.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00                  (1.96)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Optimization of Genome Editing 
Therapeutics for ADRD (U01) Review.
    Date: March 22, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Eric S. Tucker, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH/HHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-827-0799, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c697e656f2278796f67697e4c626564226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5431263d377a2021373f3126143a3d3c7a333b22">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: February 16, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-03596 Filed 2-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 10.8
 PAUL F. WALSH
OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT
 Optionee: Paul F. Walsh
    
    Optionee ID #: 106388026Grant number:
    
    Optioned shares:Grant date:
    
    Price per share: $
 Paul F. Walsh
       Award
 
 1




---



##### 



Definitions
  Vesting; Exercise Date
 Normal Vesting st nd rd
 Accelerated Vesting
 Retention of Vested Options provided however
 Method of Exercise
  2




---



##### 



Exercise by Broker-Dealer
  Tax Withholding
  Transfer of Option
  3




---



##### 



Certain Legal Restrictions
  Governing Law
  Payments
  Miscellaneous
    4




---



##### 



By:{Title}
 Grant number:Grant date:
 5
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of First Security Bancorp, Inc. (the "First
      Security") on Form 10- QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Kristie L. Eubank, Chief Financial Officer of First Security, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of First Security.





Date: November
                14, 2005
              By:
              /s/ Kristie
                L. EubankKristie
                L. EubankChhief
                Financial Officer
















(The
      balance of this page is intentionally left blank)









































Page
      29
<pre>

Exhibit  10.48

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 to Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 4,
2004, shall serve to amend the Securities Purchase Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated as of November 25, 2003, by and among Conectisys
Corporation, a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), with its headquarters
located at 24730 Avenue Tibbitts, Suite 130, Valencia, California 91355, and
each of the Buyers set forth in the Agreement.

1.      The undersigned parties hereby agree to amend Section 1(d) of the
Agreement to provide that the Buyers will fund $250,000 on the date hereof,
instead of the final $50,000 to be funded as provided in the Agreement.

2.      The Company agrees to use the proceeds of the funding referred to in
Paragraph 1 as set forth on Schedule A hereto.

3.      All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.


[Signature Page Follows]

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

CONECTISYS CORPORATION


By:/S/ ROBERT A. SPIGNO
        Robert A. Spigno
        Chief Executive Officer


AJW PARTNERS, LLC
By: SMS Group, LLC


By:/S/ COREY S. RIBOTSKY
        Corey S. Ribotsky
        Manager


AJW OFFSHORE, LTD.
By:  First Street Manager II, LLC


By:/S/ COREY S. RIBOTSKY
Corey S. Ribotsky
Manager


AJW QUALIFIED PARTNERS, LLC
By:  AJW Manager, LLC


By:/S/ COREY S. RIBOTSKY
Corey S. Ribotsky
        Manager
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1683 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1683

To restore the longstanding partnership between States and the Federal 
              Government in managing the Medicaid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2011

Mr. Gingrey of Georgia (for himself, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Upton, 
 Mr. Pitts, Mr. Harper, and Mr. Lance) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To restore the longstanding partnership between States and the Federal 
              Government in managing the Medicaid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Flexibility Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAID AND CHIP MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT REQUIREMENTS 
              UNDER ARRA AND PPACA.

    (a) Repeal of ARRA Medicaid MOE.--Subsection (f) of section 5001 of 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5) 
is amended by striking paragraph (1).
    (b) Repeal of PPACA Medicaid MOE.--Section 1902 of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a) is amended by striking subsection (gg).
    (c) Repeal of PPACA CHIP MOE.--Section 2105(d)(3) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1397ee(d)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (A);
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; and
            (3) in the paragraph heading, by striking ``Continuation of 
        eligibility standards for children until october 1, 2019'' and 
        inserting ``Continuity of coverage''.
    (d) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1902(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1396a(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (74).
            (2) Effective January 1, 2014, the paragraph (14) of 
        section 1902(e) added by section 2002(a) of Public Law 111-148 
        is amended by striking the third sentence of subparagraph (A).
    (e) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (d)(2), the 
amendments made by this section shall take effect on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
31.2
 
 Certification
of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
 
 I,
Michael T. Everett, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of WebEx Communications,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 **WEBEX
      COMMUNICATIONS, INC.**Date: May 10, 2005
    By:
    /s/ MICHAEL T.
    EVERETTMichael T. EverettChief Financial
  Officer
 Form 10-Q
for quarter ended March 31, 2005
Exhibit 10.46



Public Media Works, Inc.

14759 Oxnard Street

Van Nuys, California 91411



December 21, 2005



Stephen Brown

Chief Executive Officer

Public Media Works, Inc.

14759 Oxnard Street

Van Nuys, California 91411



|Re: | Termination of Employment Agreement and Modification of Option Agreement
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dear Stephen:



This letter confirms the agreement between Public Media Works, Inc. (the Company) and I to terminate my Employment Agreement dated as of October 1, 2005.
Such termination shall be effective as of December 21, 2005. I further acknowledge and agree that the Company has no obligations to pay to me any accrued or future compensation in any manner whatsoever under the employment agreement.



This letter further confirms the agreement between the Company and I to amend
the terms of the Option Agreement dated as of October 1, 2005 to provide that any and all unexercised options under the Option Agreement shall expire if not exercised by me within six (6) months after I cease to be on the Board of
Directors of the Company.



|                         |  |                     
|------------------------ |  | --------------------
|Sincerely,              
|                        
|/s/    GEORGE
MAINAS    
|George Mainas           
|                        
|Acknowledged and Agreed:
|                        
|Public Media Works, Inc.
|                         | 
|By:                      |  | /s/    STEPHEN BROWN
|                         |  | Stephen Brown, CEO
From: Hoag, Katherine

To: "Ryan C. Templeton"

Cc: paris.bryan@azdeq.gov

Subject: RE: Question about ARS analyses in TSD

Date: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:29:00 PM

Hi Ryan –

I understand – thanks much for the speedy response!

Kate

___________________________

Katherine Hoag, Ph.D.

U.S. EPA, Region 9

Air Quality Analysis Office (AIR-7)

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Hoag.Katherine@epa.gov

(415) 972-3970

From: Ryan C. Templeton [mailto:Templeton.Ryan@azdeq.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:25 PM

To: Hoag, Katherine

Cc: paris.bryan@azdeq.gov

Subject: RE: Question about ARS analyses in TSD

Hey Kate,

Unfortunately, due to the time constraints, we were only able to run this comparison for these two

pollutants (i.e. ammonium sulfate and coarse mass). We had originally hoped to perform it for all

pollutants, but time did not permit.

Ryan Templeton

Environmental Engineer Specialist

Air Quality Division

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality

rct@azdeq.gov

(602) 771-4230

From: Hoag, Katherine [mailto:Hoag.Katherine@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 1:00 PM

To: Ryan C. Templeton

Subject: Question about ARS analyses in TSD

Hi Ryan –

I was just wondering if you had data on the single-pollutant 20% worst-days annual averages

(analogous to Figs 19 and 23) for pollutants other than ammonium sulfate and coarse mass?
Thanks!

Kate

___________________________

Katherine Hoag, Ph.D.

U.S. EPA, Region 9

Air Quality Analysis Office (AIR-7)

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Hoag.Katherine@epa.gov

(415) 972-3970

NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended

only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged

and confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law,

and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this email and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named

above by reply e-mail, and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you.
# Europeiska unionens C 340/2016

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 340 |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 59 årgången16 september 2016 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 340

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

59 årgången16 september 2016

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Upplysningar |
| | UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN |
| | EuropaparlamentetRådet |
| 2016/C 340/01 | Uttalande från kommissionen om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2016/1627 av den 14 september 2016 om en flerårig återhämtningsplan för blåfenad tonfisk i östra Atlanten och Medelhavet och om upphävande av rådets förordning (EG) nr 302/2009 | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

IV   Upplysningar

UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN

EuropaparlamentetRådet

2016/C 340/01

Uttalande från kommissionen om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2016/1627 av den 14 september 2016 om en flerårig återhämtningsplan för blåfenad tonfisk i östra Atlanten och Medelhavet och om upphävande av rådets förordning (EG) nr 302/2009

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

IV Upplysningar

UPPLYSNINGAR FRÅN EUROPEISKA UNIONENS INSTITUTIONER, BYRÅER OCH ORGAN

Europaparlamentet Rådet

| 16.9.2016 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2016

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

C 340/1

---

Uttalande från kommissionen om Europaparlamentets och rådets förordning (EU) 2016/1627 av den 14 september 2016 om en flerårig återhämtningsplan för blåfenad tonfisk i östra Atlanten och Medelhavet och om upphävande av rådets förordning (EG) nr 302/2009 (1)

(2016/C 340/01)

Kommissionen är bekymrad över att de begränsade befogenheter som den har fått av medlagstiftarna kan förhindra att framtida åtgärder som Iccat vidtar för att revidera eller uppdatera sin kontrollplan genomförs i EU:s lagstiftning i rätt tid.

Kommissionen förklarar därför att den anser att förordningen inte föregriper någon ståndpunkt från kommissionens sida i fråga om användningen av artiklarna 290 och 291 i EUF-fördraget för införlivandet av regionala fiskeriorganisationers åtgärder.

Kommissionen förbehåller sig vidare rätten att föreslå ändringar av förordningen som ökar antalet åtgärder som ska antas genom delegerade akter eller genomförandeakter om införlivandet genom det ordinarie lagstiftningsförfarandet leder till förseningar som skulle hindra EU från att uppfylla sina internationella skyldigheter.

---

(1)  EUT L 252, 16.9.2016, s. 1.

---