alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           15439
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  2025
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     110692
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         166979
<ALLOWANCE>                                       9702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  315767
<DEPOSITS>                                      255432
<SHORT-TERM>                                     25833
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               3271
<LONG-TERM>                                      20000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       1650
<COMMON>                                          1321
<OTHER-SE>                                        8260
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  315767
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  16507
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 9277
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 25870
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               10894
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               15609
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            10261
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    15877
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (880)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  12642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16585)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     (11031)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.11)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.08
<LOANS-NON>                                      13769
<LOANS-PAST>                                       541
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  19246
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5475
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    12417
<RECOVERIES>                                       767
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 9702
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              9702
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0





</TABLE>
Order entered April 30 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 00138 - CV IN THE MATTER OF Z.T. On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texa s Trial Court Cause No. JD - 20 - 00919 - X

O RDER Before the Court is the April 28, 2021 request of Pamela Sumler, Official Court Reporter for the 305th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and extend the time to May 10, 2021 . Because this is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order certifying appellant to be tried as an adult, we caution Ms. Sumler that no further extension request s will be granted. See T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § 56.01(c), (h

- 1); s ee also Order Accelerating Juvenile Certification Appeals and Requiring Juvenile Courts to Give Notice of the Right to an Immediate Appeal , Texas Supreme Court, Misc.Docket No. 15

- 9156 (Tex. 2015) (which may be accessed at the following address:

http://www.txcourts.gov/media/1055398/159156.pdf

. ). Failure to file the reporter’s record by May 10 th will result in the Court taking any available measure to ensure the record is filed.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 65757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26281]

[[Page 65757]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8938]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Display of Sixteen Hellenistic Silver Objects From 
the Republic of Italy, Sicily Region'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Display of Sixteen Hellenistic Silver 
Objects from the Republic of Italy, Sicily Region,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about December 1, 2014, 
until on or about December 1, 2018, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: October 29, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-26281 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1510 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1510

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit a pat down search of 
 minor for purposes of air transportation security without the consent 
     and presence of a parent of the minor, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2011

 Mr. Chaffetz introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit a pat down search of 
 minor for purposes of air transportation security without the consent 
     and presence of a parent of the minor, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TSA Screening of Minors Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON PAT DOWN SEARCHES OF MINORS WITHOUT THE CONSENT 
              AND PRESENCE OF PARENT.

    Section 44901 of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking so much as precedes the first sentence and 
        inserting the following:
    ``(b) Screening of Passengers.--
            ``(1) Supervision of screening.--''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Screening of minors.--
                    ``(A) Prohibition.--A screening of a passenger who 
                is a minor may not include a pat down search of the 
                passenger unless such search--
                            ``(i) is conducted with the consent, and in 
                        the presence, of a parent of the minor; or
                            ``(ii) in the case of a minor who is not 
                        accompanied by a parent, is conducted in the 
                        presence of a representative of the air carrier 
                        or foreign air carrier undertaking to provide 
                        air transportation or foreign air 
                        transportation, respectively, for which the 
                        search is conducted.
                    ``(B) Parent defined.--In this paragraph the term 
                `parent' includes a person who is authorized to act in 
                loco parentis for purposes of providing consent with 
                respect to a pat down search under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

## Water Analysis

Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 2/15/2012 Sample Number: 120601-001 Date Collected:02/07/2012 08:00 Date Received:2/8/2012 

### 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 318 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 02/13/2012 11:19 

### Sample Number: 120601-002 Date Collected:02/07/2012 08:00 Date Received:2/8/2012 

## 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 4.30 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 02/13/2012 11:24 

### Sample Number: 120601-003 Date Collected:02/07/2012 08:00 Date Received:2/8/2012 

## Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 1.73 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 02/13/2012 11:28 

### Sample Number: 120601-004 Date Collected:02/08/2012 08:15 Date Received:2/8/2012 

## 1st Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 364 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 02/13/2012 11:33 

### Sample Number: 120601-005 Date Collected:02/08/2012 08:15 Date Received:2/8/2012 

### 2nd Stage Feed Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 4.65 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 02/13/2012 11:38 

### Sample Number: 120601-006 Date Collected:02/08/2012 08:15 Date Received:2/8/2012 

## Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL ug/L Selenium, Se 1.52 0.5 DPC EPA 200.8 0.1 02/13/2012 11:42

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.

Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 120601 Page 1 of 1
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-2069V

UNPUBLISHED

LORI ROULETTE,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: May 9, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu); 

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA).

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner.

Terrence Kevin Mangan, Jr., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On December 30, 2020, Lori Roulette filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of the influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on 

October 23, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of 

the Office of Special Masters. 

On May 6, 2022, Respondent filed a combined Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer in 

which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Rule 4(c) 

Report and Proffer. Specifically, Petitioner had no apparent history of pain, inflammation, 

1 Because this unpublished opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic 

Government Services). This means the opinion will be available to anyone with access to the internet.

In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or 

other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon 

review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public 

access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

or dysfunction of the affected shoulder prior to intramuscular vaccine administration that 

would explain the alleged signs, symptoms, examination findings, and/or diagnostic 

studies occurring after vaccine administration; she more likely than not suffered the onset 

of pain within 48 hours of vaccine administration; her pain and reduced range of motion 

were limited to the shoulder in which the intramuscular vaccine was administered; and

there is no other condition or abnormality present that would explain Petitioner’s

symptoms. Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that Petitioner has satisfied the Act’s other 

statutory and jurisdictional requirements. Id. at 4-5.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Richard MacPherson, certify that:





|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Midwest Energy Emissions Corp.;                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





|                      |     |                                       | 
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------- | 
|Dated: April 30, 2019 | By: | */s/ Richard MacPherson*              | 
|                      |     | Richard MacPherson                    | 
|                      |     | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                      |     | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
---

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Bondy Tan, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lightscape
      Technologies Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Lightscape Technologies Inc.                                                                 

Dated: August 19, 2009

| | /s/ Bondy Tan                             
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Bondy Tan                                 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer     
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal   
| | Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
| | Officer)                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lightscape
Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Lightscape Technologies Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
·i 

1 ' 

l 

l 

t 

I 

I 

l 

Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

November 20, 2013 

Brianna Tangonan < kaihiwalani@yahoo.com > 

Wednesday, November 20, 2013 8:53 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Department of Transportation (DOT) 

Dear Department of Transportation (DOT), 

~ . ; . . . ·,, ; -:. 

; :' .· 

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kaulapapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, 

and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, 

multiple islands anc! ease of booking via Global Distribution System (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Price line and etc.). It is 

important we have safe, stable & affordable service to Kalaupapa. 

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years. 

Mahala, Kenny Dudoit-Enos 

1
#### Melquiades FLORES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28262.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1956.

No attorney for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady and Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction, on a plea of guilty before the court, is for the offense of driving while intoxicated with a prior conviction for a like offense; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
# BOMBARDIER
AW/BD1/17/011 January 16th, 2017
U.S. DepartmentofTransportation, Docket Operations. West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 1200 NewJerseyAvenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 AEROSPACE Bombardier Inc. 400 c6te-Vertu Road West Dorval, Quebec, Canada H4S 1Y9 www.bornbardier.com TEL514-855-5000 FAX514-855-7301

Subject: Petition for Extension- Temporary Exemption No. 11013, relieffrom section 14 CFR Part 25.901(c) (Uncontrollable High Thrust Failure Conditions)- Bombardier Model BD-100-1A10 equipped with the Honeywell EngineAS907-2- 1A. Reference: AW-BD1/14/435 Petition for Exemption- Relieffrom section 14 CFR Part 25.901(c) By this letter, Bombardier would like to petition a six month extension to the temporary relief granted by FAA to the Model BD-100-1A10 in the Exemption No. 11013. This extension, if granted, would allow more time for Bombardier to show full compliance to requirement §25.901(c) for certain uncontrollable high-thrustfailure conditions. Bombardier has been developing the design change required to address the issue, as committed in the original exemption request (ref.). The current final approval date of the new design is coinciding with the final date as stablished by the Exemption No. 11013: four years after the granting ofthe exemption, meaning June 24th, 2018. Bombardier is currently on track to meetthe deadline. However, an extension request in 2018 would not be allowed, should any unforeseen schedule issues arise. Bombardier is therefore requesting the current extension to avoid any negative impactdue to any short and unforeseen delay. The original conditions thatwere the basis forthe original Bombardier request forthe exemption (ref.) remain unchanged. Additionally to the public interest reasons previously explained, this extension would ensure the proper development pace, guaranteeing a proper use of the resources both from FAA and from the US Company participating in the development of the design. The extension, ifgranted, will not adversely affect safety ofthe current BD-100-1A10 fleet. The original explanation provided in the exemption petition remains unchanged:

**'~s** 

### statedabove anddemonstrated to the authorities byanalysis, the risks due to uncontrollable high thrust failure conditions on the improved BD-100- 

### 1A10/AS907-2-1A willnotexceedthose forthe currentBD-100-1A10 (equipped with the AS907-1-1A engine) and for the currently known and accepted comparable existing transportcategoryairplanes."(LetterAW-BD1/14/435) 

### Page 1

### of2January 16th, 2017 AW/801/17/011


### For additional information, please contact Luciano Serra de Queiroz, by phone at (514)-855- 5001, ext. 50351, orby email at luciano.serra.de.queiroz@aero.bombardier.com

. Yours verytruly,

for John Kotnjek Manager, Airworthiness BombardierAerospace



### Page2of2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6673
VERNON LEE QUINN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN DOE, Magistrate Judge, Mecklenburg County Jail; JIM PENDERGRAPH; W. DAVID LEE, Union County, Superior Court Judge; JOHN DOE, Classification, Mecklenburg County Jail; JOHN DOE, Clerk of Superior Court, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States Dist rict Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-05-126-MU-3) Submitted: September 28, 2005 Decided: November 21, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vernon Lee Quinn, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Vernon Lee Quinn appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. SeeQuinn v. Pendergraph , No. CA-05-126-MU-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED