alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Onard HILL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28562.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 7, 1956.

' No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the felony offense of drunken driving, with punishment assessed at five years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The sentence was probated by the trial court, and from such order of probation notice of appeal was given to this court. ,

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
ex99four


CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



                          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                           (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anton Dist. Inc., a Montana
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Kenneth Larsen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Lance R. Larsen,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), that to
his knowledge:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/   Kenneth T. Larsen
      Kenneth T. Larsen
   Chief Executive Officer
   February 25, 2004



/s/ Lance R. Larsen
   Lance R. Larsen
Chief Financial Officer
February 25, 2004

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Anton Dist. Inc. and will be retained by Anton Dist. Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES F-2 AND F-3
OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,792
<SECURITIES>                                    13,186
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,823
<PP&E>                                          17,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,950)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            37
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,088
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,483
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,339)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2751-18T2

HOLLY I. BOSTWICK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CHARLES PYRCZ,

Defendant, 

and 

THREE BOYS CORPORATION,

d/b/a WINDWARD TAVERN,

Defendant-Respondent.

____________________________

Submitted December 10, 2019 – Decided

Before Judges Yannotti and Firko.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law 

Division, Ocean County, Docket No. L-0069-18.

Martin Kane Kuper, attorneys for appellant (John J. 

Kane, of counsel and on the briefs).

Thomas Joseph Bracken, attorney for respondent.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

January 10, 2020
2

A-2751-18T2

PER CURIAM

The parties have advised the court this matter has been amicably resolved 

and have stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is 

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7675

IRVING E. TWITTY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAPTAIN GINN, Allendale Adm. Staff; SERGEANT

DUKE, Ms., Allendale Adm. Staff; ALLENDALE

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, Investigation Department; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

DEPARTMENT OF HEADQUARTERS; BUREAU OF PRISON

HEADQUARTERS; GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR; ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE BOARD; EAST COAST REGIONAL OFFICE; GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-97-3890-3-19BC)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Irving E. Twitty, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Irving E. Twitty appeals the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, his action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.A.

§ 1983 (West Supp. 1998). Twitty, however, has filed an untimely

notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time

periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App.

P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder

v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978)

(quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in

the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final

orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the

appeal period are when the district court extends the time to

appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order on May 14, 1998; Twitty’s

notice of appeal was filed on November 10, 1998, which is beyond

the thirty-day appeal period. Twitty’s failure to note a timely

appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this

court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s

appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
3

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with  the amended Quarterly Report of Tell-A-Tale Incorporated
(the "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB/A  for  the period ended March  31, 2003, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I,  Anthony N. DeMint,  President  and Chief Accounting Officer of
the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.



			      /s/ Anthony DeMint
                              Anthony N. DeMint
                              President and Chief Accounting Officer
                              August 29, 2003
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

★

● ● ●

●
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of YFC 355 Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

July___,2004
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1657 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise the enforcement penalties for misrepresentation of a business concern as a small business concern owned and controlled 

by veterans or as a small business concern owned and 

controlled by service-disabled veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1657 EH

1 SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS EN2 FORCEMENT PENALTIES FOR MISREPRESEN3 TATION OF A BUSINESS CONCERN AS A 

4 SMALL BUSINESS CONCERN OWNED AND 

5 CONTROLLED BY VETERANS OR AS A SMALL 

6 BUSINESS CONCERN OWNED AND CON7 TROLLED BY SERVICE-DISABLED VETERANS. 

8 Subsection (g) of section 8127 of title 38, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘Any business’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘(1) Any business’’; 

12 (2) by striking ‘‘a reasonable period of time, as 

13 determined by the Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘a pe14 riod of not less than five years’’; and 

15 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

16 paragraphs: 

17 ‘‘(2) In the case of a debarment under paragraph (1), 

18 the Secretary shall commence debarment action against 

19 the business concern by not later than 30 days after deter20 mining that the concern misrepresented the status of the 

21 concern as described in paragraph (1) and shall complete 

22 debarment actions against such concern by not later than 

23 90 days after such determination. 

24 ‘‘(3) The debarment of a business concern under 

25 paragraph (1) includes the debarment of all principals in 
3 

•HR 1657 EH

1 the business concern for a period of not less than five 

2 years.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2011. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1657 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to revise 

disabled veterans. business concern owned and controlled by serviceowned and controlled by veterans or as a small of a business concern as a small business concern the enforcement penalties for misrepresentation
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 209 (Friday, October 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 75005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25991]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2016-0450; FRL-9953-95-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Louisiana; 
Prevention of Significant Deterioration Significant Monitoring 
Concentration for Fine Particulates

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve two revisions to the Louisiana State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
that revise the Louisiana Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 
permitting program to establish the significant monitoring 
concentration (SMC) for fine particles (PM2.5) at a zero 
microgram per cubic meter (0 [mu]g/m\3\) threshold level consistent 
with federal permitting requirements. The EPA is proposing this action 
under section 110 and part C of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 28, 
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by EPA-R06-OAR-2016-0450, 
at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to wiley.adina@epa.gov. For 
additional information on how to submit comments see the detailed 
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located 
in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adina Wiley, (214) 665-2115, 
wiley.adina@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Rules and Regulations section of this 
issue of the Federal Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP 
submittal as a direct rule without prior proposal because the Agency 
views this as noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse 
comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the 
direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in 
response to this action no further activity is contemplated. If the EPA 
receives relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be 
withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a 
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not 
institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting 
on this action should do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: October 21, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2016-25991 Filed 10-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1549 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1549

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the unearned 
                     income Medicare contribution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2011

  Mr. Grimm introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the unearned 
                     income Medicare contribution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF UNEARNED INCOME MEDICARE CONTRIBUTION.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
amended by striking chapter 2A and by striking the item relating to 
chapter 2A from the table of chapters for such subtitle.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 6654 of such Code is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``the tax under chapter 
        2, and the tax under chapter 2A'' and inserting ``and the tax 
        under chapter 2'', and
            (2) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking ``plus'' at the end of paragraph 
                (2) and inserting ``minus'', and
                    (B) by striking paragraph (3) and redesignating 
                paragraph (4) as paragraph (3).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kenneth J. Zuerblis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ Kenneth J. Zuerblis
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Kenneth J. Zuerblis
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        September 29, 2003


                                      E-12
April 9, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ELIDA CABRERA, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00187-CV V.

DOW CORNING CORPORATION, CHILI ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. 

CULLINGTON MD, FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, 

TOLBERT WILKINSON MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS FKA KNOLL 

INTERNATIONAL, MILTON ROWLEY MD, WESLEY WASHBURN MD, 

PRESTON J. CHANDLER MD, WILSHIRE FOAM PRODUCTS INC., ERNEST 

CRONIN MD, JAMES PETERSON MD, THOMAS D. CRONIN MD, FRANK J. 

GEROW MD, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, DOW CHEMICAL 

COMPANY, AND BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on January 29, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Elida Cabrera.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer of AMG
  Oil Ltd. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AMG Oil
  Ltd. for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
  amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form
  10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
  results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2006

| | /s/ Michael Hart                     
| | -------------------------------------
| | Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer



---
BOMBARDIER 

AW/BD1/17/011 

January 16th, 2017 

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations. 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 

AEROSPACE 

Bombardier Inc. 

400 c6te-Vertu Road West 

Dorval, Quebec, Canada H4S 1Y9 

www.bornbardier.com 

TEL514-855-5000 

FAX514-855-7301 

Subject: Petition for Extension- Temporary Exemption No. 11013, relieffrom section 14 

CFR Part 25.901(c) (Uncontrollable High Thrust Failure Conditions)-

Bombardier Model BD-100-1A10 equipped with the Honeywell Engine AS907-2-

1A. 

Reference: AW-BD1/14/435 Petition for Exemption- Relief from section 14 CFR Part 

25.901(c) 

By this letter, Bombardier would like to petition a six month extension to the temporary relief 

granted by FAA to the Model BD-100-1A10 in the Exemption No. 11013. This extension, if 

granted, would allow more time for Bombardier to show full compliance to requirement 

§25.901 (c) for certain uncontrollable high-thrust failure conditions. 

Bombardier has been developing the design change required to address the issue, as 

committed in the original exemption request (ref.). The current final approval date of the new 

design is coinciding with the final date as stablished by the Exemption No. 11013: four years 

after the granting of the exemption, meaning June 24th, 2018. Bombardier is currently on track 

to meet the deadline. However, an extension request in 2018 would not be allowed, should any 

unforeseen schedule issues arise. Bombardier is therefore requesting the current extension to 

avoid any negative impact due to any short and unforeseen delay. 

The original conditions that were the basis for the original Bombardier request for the exemption 

(ref.) remain unchanged. Additionally to the public interest reasons previously explained, this 

extension would ensure the proper development pace, guaranteeing a proper use of the 

resources both from FAA and from the US Company participating in the development of the 

design. 

The extension, if granted, will not adversely affect safety of the current BD-100-1A10 fleet. The 

original explanation provided in the exemption petition remains unchanged: 

'~s stated above and demonstrated to the authorities by analysis, the risks due 

to uncontrollable high thrust failure conditions on the improved BD-1 00-

1A10/AS907-2-1A will not exceed those for the current BD-100-1A10 (equipped 

with the AS907-1-1A engine) and for the currently known and accepted 

comparable existing transport category airplanes." (Letter AW-BD1/14/435) 

Page 1 of2 
January 16th, 2017 AW/801/17/011 

For additional information, please contact Luciano Serra de Queiroz, by phone at (514)-855-

5001, ext. 50351, or by email at luciano.serra.de.queiroz@aero.bombardier.com . 

Yours very truly, 

for John Kotnjek 

Manager, Airworthiness 

Bombardier Aerospace 

Page 2 of2