alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Donald C. Grenesko, the Senior Vice President/Finance and Administration ofTribune Company, certify that (i) Tribune Company’s Form 10-Kfor the year ended Dec. 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2006fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and theresults of operations of Tribune Company.

|        |   | /s/ DONALD  C. GRENESKO |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | Donald C. Grenesko           |
|   |   | Senior Vice President/       |
|   |   | Finance and Administration   |
|   |   |                         |
|   |   | February 26, 2007       |

 

143

----
OAR Box 1107 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

60) IV-B-10 

Docket Number: 

A-81-21 

Printed 4/11/2008 3:03:4 7 PM Sheet 60 of 90 

P.1 
P.2 

^ S O ST4. 

A-8I-2I 

IV-B-10 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

2 I MAR 1986 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

Discussion with VISTA Chemicals Concerning Comment on Vinyl 

Chloride Standard Revisions 

Fred Dimmick:*# ' 

Standards Development Branch (MD-13) 

Files 

On October 16, 1985, Mr. Leslie Evans and I called Mr. Joseph Ledvina 

of VISTA Chemical Company to discuss VISTA's response to a previous request 

In VISTA's response, Mr. Ledvina had indicated that 

piping and valves would be required if VISTA were to 

requirements for open-ended valves or lines in 40 CFR 

Part 61 Subpart V. The engineering basis associated with this retrofitting, in particular, at polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plants was discussed. 

for information, 

retrofitting of 

comply with the 

Mr. Ledvina with the help of his staff explained the basis for 

retrofitting of piping and valves for PVC plants. Basically, three 

pertinent situations occur in PVC plants where "capping" or "valving" an 

open-ended line or valve in vinyl chloride (VC) service would be required. 

First, standard open-ended lines or valves are used to allow air into PVC 

reactors when the reactor is dumped (i.e., when PVC is dropped through a 

valve and piping to further processing). Second, RAM valves (positive 

displacement feed valves that has an open-end) are used to charge the 

reactor with catalysts. Third, block valves connected to a common header 

are used in a multi-purpose systems to feed the VC to the reactor, to 

dump the PVC, to feed water used to clean the reactor and to remove the 

water from the reactor after cleaning; this system is diagrammed in 

Figure 1. Other such multipurpose systems exist. 

VISTA was concerned about several particular valves in their PVC 

plants. Each reactor in a PVC plant may have a common header and valves 

used as a multipurpose system for feeding, dumping, washing, and draining 

the reactor; four open-ended lines or valves would be involved. Each 

reactor may have a common header and valves used in the evacuation/ 

recovery system; two open-ended lines or valves would be involved. 

Each reactor would have one air in-take valve. Two reactors use a RAM 

valve to charge catalyst into these reactors; two open-ended lines or 

valves are involved. A three-way valve is used in the batch water stripping 
P.3 

system to direct water from one of two strippers to one receiver/storage 

vessel. The valves on the feeding, dumping, washing, and draining system 

are 6" valves; and considerable repiping and reconstructing the existing 

pipeway would be needed to add extra valves. The other valves are 3" 

valves and would not need repiping to add the extra valve. 

cc: Leslie Evans, CPB (MD-13) 

K. C. Hustvedt, CPB (MD-13) 

Karen Fidler, Radian 
P.4 

FIGURE 1 

Sewer 1 

Drain 

Wash 2 

Water 

PVC 

Dump 

VC 4 

Charge
Exhibit
      32.1(*)




Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
      Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of WebEx Communications, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Subrah S. Iyar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, for purposes
      of
      Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that to the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









Date:
      November 8, 2005










/s/ SUBRAH
      S. IYAR


Subrah
      S.
      Iyar


Chief
      Executive Officer























































_____________________________






(*)
      In
      accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos.
      33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Management’s Reports on Internal Control Over
      Financial Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic
      Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.2 is deemed to accompany
      this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purpose of Section 18 of the
      Exchange Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether
      made before or after the date hereof irrespective of any general incorporation
      language contained in any such filing, except to the extent that the registrant
      specifically incorporates it by reference.
































Form
            10-Q
            for quarter ended September 30, 2005
Exhibit 32.1

                      AXA EQUITABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007 of AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company (the "Company") as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher M. Condron, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/  Christopher M. Condron
                                  ---------------------------
                                  Christopher M. Condron
                                  Chairman of the Board,
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  March 13, 2008
James Harmer

16357 Copperridge Way

Caldwell, Idaho 83607

208.477.9332

jim@improvephotography.com

October 15, 2015

Petition for Section 333 Exemption

I hereby formally request FAA authorization for Improve Photography LLC (hereafter

“PETITIONER”) to operate a UAS for civil (non-governmental) purposes other than for recreation

or hobby.

PETITIONER requests to be exempted from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5),

61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow PETITIONER to

operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection, including but not limited to aerial imaging.

PETITIONER requests this exemption for its use of UAS both within and without the United

States. PETITIONER frequently travels abroad for photographic endeavors and seeks to use UAS

in accordance with all laws of foreign and domestic governmental authorities.

Improve Photography LLC requests this permission to pursue its use of UAS models including DJI

Phantom 1, DJI Phantom 2, DJI Phantom 3, DJI Inspire , 3D Robotics IRIS+, 3D Robotics Solo, 3D

Robotics X8+, and 3D Robotics X8- M, or other similar commercially-available and

widely-available UAS models.

PETITIONER will conduct its use of UAS in a manner which will minimize risk to the NAS, other

persons, and property. The following procedures will be followed: (1) UAS will be given a

pre-flight inspection before each flight to examine air-worthiness, (2) UAS will not be materially

altered from commercial specifications except for battery, prop, and battery alterations, (3) UAS

will not be flown over people, (4) UAS will always be flown within line of sight to operator(s)

pursuant to Section 333(b)(1), (5) UAS will never reach altitudes over exceeding those allowed,

(6) UAS will never reach speeds exceeding 50 mph, (7) operator will perform a pre-flight visual

inspection of the NAS to determine nearby dangers such as low-flying manned or unmanned

aerial vehicles, power lines, and buildings, (8) UAS will be checked for flight stability, proper

connection to remote control, and proper performance at a very low altitude before reaching the

NAS, and (9) non-participating spectators will be asked to stay a safe distance away from the

flight path of the UAS and its landing location. PETITIONER is an experienced UAS operator with

more than one year of experience.
This petition will benefit the public interest. Improve Photography LLC is a recognized leader in

the photography industry, which is heavily involved in aerial photography.

ImprovePhotography.com is visited by millions of photographers, who would benefit from safety

and other information which could be shared if Improve Photography LLC is granted this

exemption to allow it to operate UAS for non-hobby purposes.

Please grant the requested exemption under Section 333.

James Harmer

Owner, Improve Photography LLC
**EXHIBIT 23.0** **Consent    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     The Board of Directors    Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration    statements (Nos.    333-101898,333-64110,333-18051,333-121468,333-140282,333-134453,    and    333-132467)    on    Form S-8    and in the registration statements (Nos.    333-01535,333-32093,333-46117,333-58269,333-30818,333-67506    and    333-137723)    on    Form S-3    of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our reports dated    March 2, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance    sheets of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of    December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and the    related consolidated statements of operations,    stockholders’ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for the year    ended December 31, 2006, the six months ended    December 31, 2005 and each of the years in the two-year    period ended June 30, 2005, the related financial statement    schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of    internal control over financial reporting as of    December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control    over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which    reports appear in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on    Form 10-K    of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Our report on the consolidated    financial statements refers to the Company’s adoption of    Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,    “Share-Based Payment,” effective July 1, 2005. /s/  KPMG    LLP     Short Hills, New Jersey    March 2, 2007
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.



Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(the
Companies)



Written Statement by Chief
Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies Form 10-Q periodic
report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in that report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of that date.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/S/    F. NICHOLAS GRASBERGER
III                
|F. Nicholas Grasberger III                       
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                 
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and                     
|Armstrong World Industries, Inc.                 



Dated: August 2, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DONALD SHADRACK BARRETT,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00039-CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 7

of Dallas County, Texas 

(TC# M1346036H)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS Trashuna R. Salaam’s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until May 7, 2014. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BE CONSIDERED 

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Trashuna R. Sallam, Official Court Reporter for County 

Criminal Court No. 7 for Dallas County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record and forward the 

same to this Court on or before May 7, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2014.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

January 18, 2011

Jack Broadbent, Air Pollution Control Officer

Bay Area Air Quality Management District

939 Ellis Street

San Francisco, CA 94109

Re: System Audit for the Ambient Monitoring Program for Bay Area Air Quality 

Management District, May 26 – June 4, 2009

Dear Mr. Broadbent:

I am writing to transmit EPA’s report on the findings of our Technical System 

Audit (TSA) of BAAQMD’s ambient air monitoring program. This audit was performed 

in accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, Section 2.5, which requires that EPA regional offices 

conduct technical system audits of Primary Quality Assurance Organizations every three 

years. 

EPA reviewed BAAQMD’s ambient air monitoring program, including network 

management, field operations, lab operations, quality assurance, and data management 

procedures. Overall, we found that BAAQMD has a robust air monitoring program that 

generally meets or exceeds EPA requirements. As with any audit, this TSA uncovered 

some program areas within the agency that can be improved. We look forward to 

working together as BAAQMD develops a corrective action response to our audit 

findings, which is due within 60 days of receipt of the final TSA report.

I want to thank you and your staff for the full cooperation and participation we 

were given during the audit. The results of this audit contribute to EPA’s overall 

understanding of ambient monitoring in the San Francisco Bay Area. 

Please contact me if you have questions or your staff may contact Gwen 

Yoshimura (415) 947-4134 or Matthew Lakin (415) 972-3851.

Sincerely,

/s/

Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

Enclosure

cc: Eric Stevenson, BAAQMD
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 202 3

- 1419 LT Case No

. 20 22

- 301355

- CFDB

____________________________ D ONALD J AMES P ERRYMAN , III, Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County

. Elizabeth A. Blackburn , Judge

. Keith Peterson, of the Law Offices of Peterson, P.A., Mulberry, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. July 9, 2024
P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. J AY , E ISNAUGLE , and S OUD , JJ., concur
.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
#### The State, ex rel. Misamore et al., Appellants, *v.*Hancock County Board of Education, Appellee. The State, ex rel. Rohrbaugh, Appellant, *v.*County Board of Education of Henry County School District, Appellee. The State, ex rel. Rosebrock, Appellant, *v.*County Board of Education of Henry County School District, Appellee. The State, ex rel. Sonnenberg, Appellant, *v.*County Board of Education of Henry County School District, Appellee.

(Nos. 27287, 27289, 27412 and 27413

Decided May 10, 1939.)

*400*Mr. A. G. Fuller,*for appellants, F. O. Misamore et al.

*Mr. James Donovan, Jr., Mr. P. C. Prentiss*and *Mr. Otto W. Hess,*for appellant, Andrew J. Rohrbaugh.

*Mr. Theodore Daman*and *Mr'. P. G. Prentiss,*for appellants, Henry G. Rosebroek and Edward Sonnenberg.

Messrs. *Knepper, White & Dempsey*and *Messrs. Blackford <& Blackford,*for appellee, Hancock Connty Board of Edncation.

*Mr. A. P. Stalter, Mr. Franklin J. Stalter*and *Messrs. Knepper, White S 'Dempsey,*for appellee, Connty Board of Edncation of Henry Connty School District.

By the Court.

These canses involve the construction of Section'4696, General Code, as related to Section 7600-7, General Code. On authority of the case of *State, ex rel. Adsmond,*v. *Board of Education of Williams County, ante,*383, this day decided, this court holds that since the petitions of the electors, residing in the territory sought to be transferred, were filed with the county boards of education in time for consideration at the annual meeting of the boards to consider matters relating to the organization plan for the school year 1938-1939, the petitions being otherwise valid, it was the duty of the county boards of education to consider and allow the petitions and approve the transfers.

The judgments of the Court of Appeals are reversed and these causes are remanded to that court for further proceedings in conformity with the decision of this court.

*Judgments reversed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, J J., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     5


<CAPTION>

Article 5 Fin. Data Schedule for 1st Qtr 10-Q

<S>                               <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                               111,365
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     111,365
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       898,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                404,900
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                           1,200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         898,770
<SALES>                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           0
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         13,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    (128,989)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     7,333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      315,695
<INCOME-TAX>                         302,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         302,708
<EPS-BASIC>                            .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .25



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1








                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form SB-2 No. 333-59395) pertaining to 2,875,000 shares of common stock, (Form
S-3 No. 333-1149) pertaining to 2,264,006 shares of common stock issuable upon
conversion of preferred stock and exercise of warrants, (Form S-3 No. 33-57116)
pertaining to 1,083,333 shares of common stock and 50,000 shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of warrants, (Form S-8 No.33-45536) pertaining to
1,810,000 shares of common stock, (Form S-8 No. 33-63047) pertaining to the 1991
Stock Option Plan, (Form S-8 Nos.33-45523 and 333-49919) pertaining to the 1991
Stock Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-36385) pertaining to the 1990 Restricted Stock
Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33-22052) pertaining to the 1988 Employee Incentive Stock
Plan and (Form S-8 No. 2-93693-C) pertaining to the 1983 Employee Stock Option
Plan of GV Medical, Inc., of our report dated February 5, 1999 with respect to
the financial statements of SpectraScience, Inc., included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 29, 1999