alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

Calendar No. 32

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 533

To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal court, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 10 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

MARCH 16, 1995

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal

court, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL.

4 The first sentence of section 1447(c) of title 28,

5 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘any defect

6 in removal procedure’’ and inserting ‘‘any defect other

7 than lack of subject matter jurisdiction’’.
Calendar No. 32

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 533

A BILL

To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to

Federal court, and for other purposes.

MARCH 16, 1995

Reported without amendment
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Loren Moll, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Loren Moll                                  			

Loren Moll |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer and |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | Principal Financial Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | May 15, 2007 |
|--------|--------------|
Azoxystrobin Human Health R i sk Assessment DP No. 394285 

### UNITED STATES ENV IR ONMENTAL PR OTECTION AGENCY WASHING T ON, D.C. 20460



### MEMORANDUM Date: 12118/2012 O FFI CE OF C HEMI CAL SA FETY AND POLLUTION PRE VENTI ON



### SUBJECT: Azoxystrobin : Rev is ion to the Human H ealth Risk Assessment for the Proposed Use on Sugarcane. PC Code: 1288 10 Decision No.: 451265 Petition No.: 1F789l Risk Assessment Ty pe: Single ChemicaUAggregate TXRNo.: NA MRIDNo.: NA DP Barcode: 0394285 Registration Nos.: 100-1120, 100-1220 , 100-1098, 100- 1324 Regulatory Action: Section 3 Registration Case No.: 7020 CAS No.: 131860-33-8 40 CFR: §180.507 

### FROM : Kristin Rury , Biologist

# ~**~~** Whang Phang , Senior

# Toxic~l~g~**h** Meheret Negussie, Chemist 

### lYe4e· ·**w~· e._**  Risk Assessment Branch 3 Health Effec ts Division (7509P) 

### THROUGH : Jef f Dawson, Acting Branch Chief Risk Assessment Branch 3 Health Effects Division (7509P) 

### TO: Shaunta H ill Fungicide Branch, RM#20 Registration Division (7505P) This memorandum amends the Human Health Risk Assessment (D394285, K. Rury, 04/30/ 2012), a petition for new uses of azoxystrobin on sugarcane. In D394285, a revised Section B was requested: 860
. 1200 Directions for Use
• The rotational crop restrictions on the registered label for Qui lt Xcel® Fungi cide (EPA Reg. No. 1 00-1324) s hould be revi sed to increase the plant-back interval (PBI) for carrot from 0 days to 36 days.
Page 1 of2

### Azoxystrobin Human Health Risk Assessment DP No. 394285 CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDA TIONS 

### The recommended rev is ion s ofthe rotational crop restriction under OCSPP 860.1200 Direc tions for Use for EPA Reg. No. 100-1324 for carrots from 0 days to 36 are not needed. Tolerances for azoxystrobin, including its Z-iso mer , hav e been established on vegetable, root, subgroup 1A, which includes carrots. All other information contained in the risk assessment (D 394285) remains unchanged.

Page 2 of2
#### Stanley BRICKHOUSE, Jr. v. STATE.

No. 28658.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 14, 1956.

No attorney of record on appeal for appellant. , .

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Felony theft is-the offense;- the punishment, 5 years in the1 jpenitentiáry.

The appellant has filed his personal affidavit stating that he no longer desires to prosecute this appeal and requesting that the same be dismissed.

The request is accordingly granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC MERCANTILE BANCORP

Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q

for the quarter ended March 31, 2010

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the Company), hereby certifies that
(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies
with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/  NANCY A.
GRAY                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Nancy A. Gray, Chief Financial
Officer                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                   |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission on its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Too Late Financial Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

May 13,2004
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Dou sir1 

multr tfuroto aad f 

tMn8 ior the o p a l 

or r0-0trting JOP 

jority of vhooo 

rtorrr *hiah 

, and aorporaticm 

oak, &Ild in vhlca 

8 trwtu undu an 

tO8 8tOrU 8UbjOOt t0 

VI l O th0 OtwO8 Or th0 tV0 

OtbtUU48fnglOdi4illt 

by virtue of a power of attornoy 

O?fty o f tho 8tOOk In l ooh OWh8 rOW 8tOIW8 b0 t.OXOa 88 0 

xn our opinion IO. o-2764, va held that vhem tb 

I- @‘OUp Of ~W8Oll8 VhO OOIhtrOlhd th@ ItOr. Oi 8 ~tfMP8bip al80, by D8jOrity 8tOOk OVlMrlhiP, OOJltFOlbd th0 8tOP88 
v* Mate, aot frt sported. 

8ootioo 6 U Artlola lul-d, 1. 1. o., tha awn 

btoxw Tax Lav,rud8 w folloYrr 

%o pOV181OU Ot thI8 Aat #h411 be l oa8tru.d 

to q&+4 to OVUM pu8on, agut, ?*oolvu, truotu, 

tirrr, ~O~pWatfOa~ ~Op~~~8hip W l 8#OOia tfOXI, 

WXhl’Ol&d W 

Uith ~OtOi@lAO~ t0 w8 8OOtlOIl th. OOWt in th. Butt M8l, 

8U&lFa, OrId; 

‘9.0. 6 VU MIlfiO8tl latondod to protont 

luge ahaIM of otomr, vhr oh reoelve tha boneiltr 

E” Y 

a omoll MMgeMnt w OoQtrOl 0t.r a n?mlndltldlal unftr w 0 

“p 

oMt1oIla 

purpou of thm lu vould bo do orted.” 

t& olou 

Vhik, in UfthU Oi w tV0 fbOt OitWtfOM ~.8Oldl d b7 Lou, 60.8 tho aam Individual o? &roog OS indivldwl8 

OWlI tb MjWft 

ruoh f4Ot r 

htOFO8t iJ& tV0 OO~P~tiOAO, mt &A l reb Of 

8:tW 10118 the 8U&@ Individuala br. tha UltiMt. 

OOIkt?Ol Ud ~OMnt Of rU thr 8tWW inVOlVOd. @I th. Ow 

hand tvo ladlrldwla ova l 8a 

a, 

Witr Of tb 8tOOk in om oarporrtlon, 8nd tho aam tvo in rldwlo oontrol the rjwltt or 

8tOok In the other bJ vl?tw of OVIUP8tiiip of one usd 8a lrrovoabblr trwt la vhioh the other I8 trwtro vlth l brolate 
Honwablr &w&e 1. PhrPWrd, we 3 

ovor to WI end OOntPol the 8toOk l 8 tmNter. 

Ln 

Oa tb8 other 

d On. Iadltldurl 18 8Ob OVBU Of tV0 8tOr.8 UId OOZItrOl8 

tvo othU 8tOr.8 br VirtW Of l 0V.r Of l ttO?M J 

R f 

vlq b lB 

ruoh l thorltr’. Thue I8 no dlf ranoo in plaolp l u in l ltbu 

of th88. O&8.8, from the Butt Oa8e. The oontrol r&d mnAgr8ont in r&oh 0480, I# jU8t l 8 l ffOOtiVO, and jWt a8 Un&'&IlVOoal a8 ii tha oontrol ouo rooou#rh8d by wan8 of ujorlty 

8tOOk OVM~8hlp, Urd ~0 think it I8 jWt a8 l ff8OtiVO4 OOVOrOd 

br th8 8tatUt8. It fO11OV8 thAt, in 8rOh Of th. frOt rftUb 

tionr prorented brpu the 8twrr Ue Wteblr a8 l ring10 ohain 

and that each Of 7OUr qw8tiOM mU8t be U8V8r.d 10 t& 8ffiPmat; V8. 

hti8tUt 

Ft:bb
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Soyo Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-Q/A for the quarter  ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Nancy Chu,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Nancy Chu
-----------------------
Nancy Chu
Chief Financial Officer
August 7, 2007
## **EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Advance Cellular Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report), Dean Antonis, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/ Dean Antonis                       Dean AntonisTreasurer and Principal Financial OfficerDate:  October 14, 2003This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Eddie Chou, Chief Financial Officer, of
Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for
      the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                            

Dated: March 25, 2008



/s/ Eddie
ChouEddie
Chou Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Biopack
Environmental Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Biopack Environmental
Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
#### Roy Washington LOUD, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29552.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1958.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal April 9, 1958.

*853Jack C. Morgan, Kaufman, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of whiskey in a dry area, with two prior convictions for an offense of like character alleged for enhancement; the punishment, one year in jail and a fine of $400.

Trial was had at a term of the County ■Court of Kaufman County which convened on July 15, 1957, and ended on October 19, 1957. Appellant’s motion for new trail was overruled on September 28, 1957, at which time he gave notice of appeal.

It appears from the transcript that the recognizance on appeal was entered into October 24, 1957, which was after the term of court at which this cause was tried had expired.

A recognizance entered into after the expiration of the term at which the case was tried is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Article 830, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Ellerbe v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 277 S.W.2d 701; and Haley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 303 S.W.2d 385.

The appeal is dismissed.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appeal bond having been entered into, the appeal is reinstated.

The information alleged a prior conviction in Cause 6612 on April 13, 1957, for transporting whisky in a dry area, and a conviction in Cause No. 6555 on January 7, 1957, for the sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry area, and it was properly alleged that the conviction in Cause 6612 was for an offense committed after the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 6555 had become final.

We find no evidence in the record from which the date of the commission of the offenses for which appellant was previously convicted may be ascertained.

It is thus apparent that the State failed to prove the allegations of the information essential to the use of a second prior conviction in that it was not shown that the conviction in Cause 6612 was for an offense committed after the conviction in Cause 6555 became final. The court was in error in authorizing the jury to assess the punishment at four times the punishment for a first offense. Simpson v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 228, 233 S.W.2d 584; Armendariz v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 294 S.W.2d 98.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
EXHIBIT32.2

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Lawrence Finn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/LawrenceFinn            
LawrenceFinn

ChiefFinancial Officer

 

August15,2005
#### Curtis T. FLEWELLEN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28292.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, .State’s Atty.^ Austin, for the State.

*768WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for drunken driving; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record contains no statement of facts and no bills of exception, and the exceptions to the court’s charge cannot be appraised in the absence *oí*a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.
I Frank To Frank Montarelli/OCP/R8/USEPAJUS@EPA Montarelli/OCP/R8/USEPAJU 

### cc S bee Tim Russ/P2/R8/USEPAJUS. 

### 01110/2008 10:51 AM Subject SLTribune Editorial: Close the crack: Eliminate loopholethaI

" allows morepollution . ! 

# , http://www.sltrib.com/opinion/ci_7924871



# ,Close the crack: Eliminate loopholethatallows more pollution Tribune Editorial Article Last Updated: 

### 01/09/200806:40:27 PM MST

There appears to be an avoidable breakdown in Utah's air pollution rules that needs fixing

- fast. Aclean-air group based in Denver pointed out a majorcrack through which some pollution permit-holders could purposely be falling. The rule recognizes that companies can experience unexpected malfunctions of machinery or human-caused errors that could hamper pollution-control operations temporarily. ' Rocky Mountain Clean Air Action says some companies have pushed the limits set by the rule In orderto exceed ,pollution limits without penalty. The group has sent a petition to the federal Envirorimental Protection Agency, asking that the EPA put its foot down and demand that Utah regtJlators close the loophole. There's really nothing todebate here. Utah's rule governing "unavoidable breakdowns"that could result in a refinery, power plant, cement producer or other regulated polluter emitting moregunkthan allowed by law is quite cle"r in its intent. 

### It states that these "unavoidable" malfunctions forwhich an exemption in pollution limits is allowed arejustthat

­ unavoidable

- and warns that breakdowns "caused entirelyortn part by poor maintenance, careless operation orany other preventable upset condition or preventable equipment breakdown shall not be considered [an) unavoidable -! breakdown." The state estimatesthat between 

### 20 and 

### 40 ofthese breakdowns have been reported during each ofthe past two years· more, itseems to us, than could reasonably beconsidered unavoidable. ' The EPA has repeatedly told the Utah 'Divislon ofAir Quality thatthe rule is illegal underthefederal Clean AirAct. The agency has ordered the DAQ to eliminate the exemption altogetheror revise itto seal the crack. DAQ officials counterthat the EPA rejected its proposed change several years ago. Inthe meantime, the breakdowns continue and companies are allowed, largely with impunity. to spew even more pollutants into the already dangerously polluted air afong the Wasatch/Front. The EPA and the state should demand thatcompanies do whatever ittakes to keep pollution within limits and to levy consistent fines when theydon't, With Salt Lake Valley air getting dirtierevery year, we don't have timefor governmental squabbling.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of First Security Bancorp, Inc. (the First Security) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of
First Security, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Security.

|                       |  |                                                                                                                                          
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  August 12, 2004 |  | Signature  /s/ John G. Sullivan
                  John G. Sullivan
                  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(The balance of this page is intentionally left blank)

Page 27 of 27