alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly report of Lion Capital Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
2006 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy T. Page,  Chief  Executive
Officer  and Chairman  of the Board of Directors  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,
in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                           /s/ Timothy T. Page
                           ------------------------------------------------
                           Timothy T. Page
                           Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
                           Board of Directors
                           Date: May 11, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2024)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 8989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02844]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 8989]]

                Notice of February 7, 2024

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to the Situation in and in Relation to Burma

                On February 10, 2021, by Executive Order 14014, I 
                declared a national emergency pursuant to the 
                International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 
                1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security and foreign policy of 
                the United States constituted by the situation in and 
                in relation to Burma.

                The situation in and in relation to Burma, and in 
                particular the February 1, 2021 coup, in which the 
                military overthrew the democratically elected civilian 
                government of Burma and unjustly arrested and detained 
                government leaders, politicians, human rights 
                defenders, journalists, and religious leaders, thereby 
                rejecting the will of the people of Burma as expressed 
                in elections held in November 2020 and undermining the 
                country's democratic transition and rule of law, 
                continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat 
                to the national security and foreign policy of the 
                United States. For this reason, the national emergency 
                declared on February 10, 2021, must continue in effect 
                beyond February 10, 2024. Therefore, in accordance with 
                section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the 
                national emergency declared in Executive Order 14014 
                with respect to the situation in and in relation to 
                Burma.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    February 7, 2024.

[FR Doc. 2024-02844
Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3395-F4-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 12339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03289]



[[Page 12339]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than March 18, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri, 64198-0001. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f646c6e5f5f43464c4e5b4640416c4042424a415b5c6f444c01495d4d01405d48"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c18a8280b1b1ada8a2a0b5a8aeaf82aeacaca4afb5b281aaa2efa7b3a3efaeb3a6">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Panhandle Bancshares, Inc., Guymon, Oklahoma; to merge with 
Spearman Bancshares, Inc., and indirectly acquire First National Bank, 
both of Spearman, Texas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-03289 Filed 2-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**@ROAD, INC.**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of @Road, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A forthe quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Krish Panu, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

August 9, 2006

 
| /s/ Krish Panu |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Krish Panu               |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1

LOGO

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

AmericanWest
Bancorporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement numbers 333-132811, 333-101040, 333-95989, 333-72834,
333-65628, 333-65630, and 333-58511, on Forms S-8 of AmericanWest Bancorporation of our report dated March 4, 2010, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of AmericanWest Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2009, which report is included in this annual
report on Form 10-K of AmericanWest Bancorporation for the year ended December 31, 2009.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ Moss Adams LLP
|                  
|Portland, Oregon  
|March 4, 2010
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DENVER R. HALL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3334 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed April 13, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Nancy Moate Ley, Judge. Denver R. Hall, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KELLY, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                              ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In  connection  with the filing by Wincroft,  Inc.  (the  "Company") of the
Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  March  31,  2005  (the
"Report"), I, Danny Wettreich,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operation of the Company.

                                                        /s/ Danny Wettreich
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Danny Wettreich
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
#### Neal Wood LYONS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 37772.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 24, 1965.

Rehearing Denied April 28, 1965.

H. E. (Bill) Tarpley, Phil Burleson, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Frank Watts, John Vance, and W. John Allison, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for indecent exposure to a child; the punishment, two years.

In view of our disposition of the case, a recitation of the facts is unnecessary other than to observe that upon the trial the eleven-year-old child named in the indictment identified the appellant as a man who had exposed his sexual parts to her on the date alleged. She further stated that after she had reported the incident to her parents she not only identified a picture of appellant but also identified the appellant, in person, at a police lineup as the man who had exposed himself to her.

Testifying in his own behalf, appellant denied that he was the man. He also testified to an alibi and was corroborated by other testimony in support of the defense.

Over appellant’s timely objection, the state was permitted to show by the testimony of Officers Bynum and Brumit that the minor child did identify appellant at the police lineup and also picked out his picture, from a number of pictures furnished her by the officers, as the man who had exposed himself to her.

Appellant objected to the testimony on the ground that it was an effort by the state to bolster the testimony of an un-impeached witness.

In permitting the testimony over such objection, the court erred. The child had positively identified appellant at the trial as the guilty party. True, she was fully cross-examined by appellant with reference to her identification but she was not impeached.

It is the rule that while a witness who has identified her assailant at the trial may testify that she also identified him *951while he was in custody of the police, others may not bolster her unimpeached testimony by corroborating the fact that she did identify him. See: Reddick v. State, 35 Tex.Cr.R. 463, 34 S.W. 274; Weaver v. State, 68 Tex.Cr.R. 214, 150 S.W. 785; Fortune v. State, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 569, 259 S.W. 573; Lucas v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 443, 271 S.W.2d 821.

It cannot be said that the testimony presented by the state bolstering the prosecuting witness’s testimony was not injurious to appellant. Its admission calls for a reversal of the conviction.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the court.
1

Order filed September 14, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-15-00167-CR

____________

JOSHUA JACOB PATTERSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-DCR-058778

ORDER
2

The Reporter’s Record was filed on July 15, 2015. On August 20, 2015, appellant 

filed a motion to order the filing of the trial exhibits. We grant the motion and issue the 

following order.

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) 

and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of all trial exhibits, including State’s 

Exhibit 70, a video. 

The exhibit clerk of the 240th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of 

this court the originals of all trial exhibits, including State’s Exhibit 70, a video, on or 

before September 24, 2015. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and 

keep safe these original exhibits; to deliver them to the justices of this court for their 

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the originals of these trial 

exhibits, to the clerk of the 240th District Court.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gifford A.
      Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Gifford
              A. DieterleGifford
              A. DieterleChief
                Executive Officer
              October
                31, 2006
NO. 07-08 -024 5-CR NO. 07-08 -024 6-CR NO. 07-08 -024 7-CR NO. 07-08 -024 8-CR NO. 07-08 -024 9-CR NO. 07-08 -025 0-CR NO. 07-08 -025 1-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL D JU NE 24, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ JOH N PAU L ORTEGA, JR ., Appel lan t

v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 10 8 th DIS T RI CTCOU RTOF P OT T ERCOU NTY; NO S. 5 2,879- E, 5 4,034- E, 5 4,569- E, 5 4,570- E, 5 4,571- E, 5 4,863- E, 5 5,917- E; HON. ABE LO PEZ, PRES IDING

_________

_________

_________

____ ORDER OF DISMISSAL

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRT LE, JJ. A p p e ll ant, Jo h n P a u l O rt e g a , J r . , a p p e a l sh i sco n v i ct i o n sfo r p o s s e s s i o n o f a cont rolled sub stan ce, cruelty to anim als, aggravated assault against a pub lic servant(2),
ro b b e ry, a g g ra vated ass aul t w it h a d eadl y weapon a nd s ex ual as saul t of a c hil d. The2

certif ication of rig ht to app eal i n each case execut ed by the trial court states th at th is “i s a ple a barg ain ca se and t he defe ndant has no r ig ht of appea l. ” Thisci rc umstan ce was b ro u ghtto th e atte n ti o n of ap p e lla n t, w h o is a ct in g pro se , and opp ortun ity was granted him to ob tain a n am end ed ce rtification entitling app ellantt o a ppe al each case. No such
cer ti ficat ion was re cei ved w it hin the ti me we al lotted. H o wever, appell ant fil ed a moti on re qu e s t in g t h a tco u n s e l b e a p p o in t e d

. H a vin g re c e ive d n o a m e n d e d ce rt if ic a t io n , we d is m is st h e a p p e a ls p e r T e xa sRu le o f A p p e l l a t e P ro c e d u re 2 5

. 2 (d ). Ac c o rd in gl y, appel lan t’ s mot ion for a ppoi nted couns el isdeni ed asmoot.
Per C ur iam Do not p ubl is h.
### In The C ou rt o f A p p ea ls Si x t h Appe l l at e Di st r i c t o f Te x as a t Te x ar ka na

______________________________ No . 0 6- 08 -0 00 69 -C V

______________________________ TEXAS KENWORTH CO., Appellant

V. R. BYRON ROACH, TRUSTEE, L .L .C., AND CHALKER ENERGY MANA GEMENT I I , L .L .C., Appellees

On Appea l from the 71st Judicial District Court

Har rison County , Texas Trial Court No. 07-0512

B e f o r e M o r r i s s , C
. J. , C a

rt e r an d M o s e l e y , JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley2 MEMORANDUM OPI

NI ON T ex as Ke nwo rthC o . , ap p el l an t , an d R
. By ro nR o ac h , T ru s t ee , L
. L
. C
. , an d C h al k er E n er gy Manag ement I I , L .L .C., appellee s, have filed with this Court a joi nt motion to di smiss the pending appea l in this matter. The parties r epre sent to this C ourt they h av e re ac hed a f ull and final settlement. In such a c ase, no r eal c ontroversy exis ts, and in the abse nce of a contr oversy , the appe al is m oo t. We gra nt t he mot ion

and dis mis s th is a

pp e a l.

Ba iley C. Moseley Justice Date Submitted: September 22, 2008 Date D ecide d: September 23, 2008
#### Garland FLINN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28231.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 4, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $250.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is' presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
#### Willie MARR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 37085.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 14, 1964.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 1964.

*929Johnny M. Chirafis, Corsicana, for appellant.

Jimmy Morris, County Atty., Corsicana, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is contributing to the delinquency of a minor; the punishment, six months in jail.

Three fifteen year old Corsicana Junior High School boys, including the boy named in the information, testified that on the night of the Corsicana-Palestine football game in 1963, as they were walking in the vicinity of the high school, they were accosted by appellant, who asked them if they wanted to go for a ride. They accepted and appellant drove out in the country, where he gave each of them some beer, committed an act of oral sodomy upon one of them, and felt of the private parts of the other two, each in turn.

Appellant’s confession recites that on the night of the Corsicana-Palestine football game in 1963, he picked up three boys close to the Corsicana High School, drove them out in the country, and felt of the private parts of two of the boys.

Appellant did not testify in his own behalf, but called witnesses who testified that he was at another and different place on the night in question. The jury resolved this conflict in the evidence against appellant, and we find the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

Appellant’s contention that the evidence is insufficient to corroborate the testimony of the three accomplice witnesses is overruled under the authority of Scott v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. *77,*318 S.W.2d 650, and cases there cited where we have held that the testimony of an accomplice witness together with the confession of the accused is sufficient to establish the corpus delicti of an offense.

Appellant’s objections and exceptions to the Court’s charge present nothing for review because there is no showing that they were ever presented to the trial court or that he ruled thereon. Stone v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 201, 346 S.W.2d 323.

Finding no reversible *error,*the *judgment*is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1345 

To rescind any unobligated discretionary appropriations returned to the Federal Government by a State or locality and require that such funds 

be retained in the general fund of the Treasury for deficit reduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2011 

Mr. CHABOT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To rescind any unobligated discretionary appropriations returned to the Federal Government by a State or locality 

and require that such funds be retained in the general 

fund of the Treasury for deficit reduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Wasting Amer5 ican Tax Dollars Act’’ or the ‘‘SWAT Act’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1345 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF FUNDS RETURNED BY A STATE OR 

2 LOCALITY TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT 

3 AND USE FOR DEFICIT REDUCTION. 

4 (a) RESCISSION OF RETURNED FEDERAL FUNDS.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para6 graph (2), there are rescinded any unobligated dis7 cretionary appropriations awarded to a State or lo8 cality by the Federal Government that are volun9 tarily returned by the State or locality to the Fed10 eral Government. 

11 (2) EXCEPTIONS.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

12 apply to funds made available for an account, pro13 gram, project, or activity of— 

14 (A) the Department of Defense; or 

15 (B) the Department of Homeland Security. 

16 (b) RETENTION OF FUNDS FOR DEFICIT REDUC17 TION.—Funds rescinded under subsection (a) shall be re18 tained in the general fund of the Treasury for Federal 

19 budget deficit reduction. 

20 (c) NO REDISTRIBUTION OF RETURNED FUNDS.— 

21 This section shall apply in lieu of any provision of law 

22 that provides for the redistribution of funds awarded to 

23 a State or locality that remain unobligated by such State 

24 or locality. 

25 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1345 IH

1 (1) The term ‘‘State or locality’’ means a State, 

2 unit of local government, or Indian tribe. 

3 (2) The term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several 

4 States, the District of Columbia, and any common5 wealth, territory, or possession of the United States. 

6 (e) APPLICATION.—This section shall apply to funds 

7 returned on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS