alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03517]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

[DOCKET NO. 24-11]


Notice of Filing of Complaint and Assignment; OL USA LLC, 
Complainant, v. Maersk A/S, Respondent

Served: February 14, 2024.
    Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal 
Maritime Commission (the ``Commission'') by OL USA LLC (the 
``Complainant'') against Maersk A/S (the ``Respondent''). Complainant 
states that the Commission has subject matter jurisdiction over the 
complaint pursuant to the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 U.S.C. 40101 et seq. 
and personal jurisdiction over the Respondent as an ocean common 
carrier as defined in 46 U.S.C. 40102.
    Complainant is a limited liability company formed and existing 
under the laws of the state of Delaware with a principal place of 
business in Westbury, New York, and a shipper, as defined in 46 U.S.C. 
40102(17), in the business of providing non-vessel-operating common 
carrier services.
    Complainant identifies Respondent as a foreign corporation 
organized and existing under the laws of Denmark with a principal place 
of business in Copenhagen, Denmark, and an ocean common carrier as 
defined in 46 U.S.C. 40102(18).
    Complainant alleges that Respondent engaged in unreasonable and 
deceptive acts that violated 46 U.S.C. 40501 and 46 CFR part 520. 
Complainant alleges these violations arose from a dysfunctional online 
tariff platform maintained by the Respondent, and the platform 
prevented access to and review of Respondent's tariffs.
    An answer to the complaint must be filed with the Commission within 
25 days after the date of service.
    The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's 
electronic Reading Room at https://www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/proceeding/24-11/. This proceeding has been assigned to the Office of 
Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding judge 
shall be issued by February 14, 2025, and the final decision of the 
Commission shall be issued by August 29, 2025.

David Eng,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-03517 Filed 2-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         118,867
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (500)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,425
<PP&E>                                           4,425
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (239)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 184,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       215,658
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   184,001
<SALES>                                         25,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,293
<CGS>                                           39,849
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,918)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (64,173)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.91)


</TABLE>
Order filed December 28, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00955

- CV

____________ IN RE SILVER 1999 LEXUS GS 300 4DR, TXLP

- DG4C418, AND VIN #T8BD68S3X00 66038, ET, AL

.

On Appeal from the 56th District Court Galve ston County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12

- CV

- 0513



### ORDER
The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 13, 2012 . The clerk’s
record was filed October 16, 2012. To date, the filing fee of $175.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant has established indigence has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. On November 2, 2012, the court notified appellant that the filing fee was past due and the appeal was subject to dismissal. No response was filed.
In addition, t he reporter’s record in this c ase was due October 16, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The official court reporter notified this court that appellant has not made payment arrangements for preparation of the record. On October 23,2

2012, the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do not require a reporter = s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no response

. Therefore, the c ourt iss ues the following order: Accordingly, we order appellant, Andrew Ronald Rodriguez , to file a brief in this appeal and pay the filing fee in the amount of $175.00 to the Clerk of this

court on or before January 18 , 20 13

. If appellant fails to compl y with this order,
the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7675

IRVING E. TWITTY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPTAIN GINN, Allendale Adm. Staff; SERGEANT DUKE, Ms., Allendale Adm. Staff; ALLENDALEADMINISTRATIVE STAFF, Investigation Department; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENT OF HEADQUARTERS; BUREAU OF PRISONHEADQUARTERS; GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR; ADJUSTMENT COMMITTEE BOARD; EAST COAST REGIONAL OFFICE; GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-97-3890-3-19BC) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 21, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Irving E. Twitty, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Irving E. Twitty appeals the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, his action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998). Twitty, however, has filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on May 14, 1998; Twitty’s notice of appeal was filed on November 10, 1998, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Twitty’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant’s appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.1

                                      1999

              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

         NUMBER __________
         __________ SHARES

                            NEW CAPITAL IWORKS, INC.
          AUTHORIZED CAPITAL STOCK: 20,000,000 SHARES - PAR VALUE $.001
20,000,000 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK           10,000,000 SHARES OF PREFERRED STOCK

                     SEE RESTRICTIVE LEGEND ON REVERSE SIDE

THIS CERTIFIES THAT ___________________________________________________________
is the registered holder of _______________________________ Shares of Common
Stock transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in
person or by Attorney upon SURRENDER OF THIS CERTIFICATE PROPERLY ENDORSED.

         THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH AT ITS PRINCIPAL OFFICE, WITHOUT CHARGE TO
         EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS, A STATEMENT OF THE POWERS,
         DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL OR OTHER
         SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF AND THE
         QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR
         RIGHTS.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE SAID CORPORATION HAS CAUSED THIS
         CERTIFICATE TO BE SIGNED BY ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS AND ITS
         CORPORATE SEAL HEREUNTO AFFIXED

         THIS          DAY OF                   1999
             -----------------------------------------

         -------------------------------        -------------------------------
            Kevin DeVito,  Secretary                Kevin DeVito, President
<PAGE>  36

                                                                EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Form 10-QSB of First Security Bancorp, Inc.
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, I, John G. Sullivan, Chief Financial
Officer of First Security Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      Such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies
         with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in such Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
         June 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
         condition and results of operation of First Security Bancorp, Inc.



                                  By: /s/ John G. Sullivan
Date:  August 19, 2003            _________________________________
                                  John G. Sullivan
                                  Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                    OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Catuity,
Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14b or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.

Alfred H. Racine III, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and John H.
Lowry, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, each certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006

                                       By: /s/ Alfred H. Racine III
                                           ------------------------
                                           Alfred H. Racine III
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       By: /s/ John H. Lowry
                                           -----------------
                                           John H. Lowry
                                           Chief Financial Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       23
#### Haviland, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

(No. 27299

Decided June 14, 1939.)

*546
      *Mr. Bernard Murray*and *Messrs. Wardlaw, Gertner & Armstrong,*for appellant.

*Mr. Herbert S. Duffy*and *Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorneys general, *Mr. Eugene CarUn, Mr. E. P. Felher, Mr. Ralph J. Bartlett,*prosecuting attorney, *Mr. David B. Sharp*and *Mr. Edmund B. Paxton,*for appellee.

By the Court.

In the instant case the Court of Common Pleas at the conclusion of plaintiff’s testimony, upon' due consideration thereof, directed a verdict for the defendant. The Court of Appeals considered the evidence, came to the same conclusion and affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Upon examination of the record we fail to find prejudicial error. Nor do we find any substantial conflict between the rule of law applied in the instant case and the rule *547applied in the ease of *Industrial Commission*v. *Gillard, supra.*

While in the *Gillard case*the Court of Common Pleas and the Court of Appeals both found there was a causal connection between the cranking of the truck and the death of Gillard, in the instant case the Court of Common Pleas and the Court of Appeals both found as a matter of law from the facts disclos'ed that there was no such causal connection resulting in the death of Haviland. Both are borderline cases in respect to claims involving internal injuries. In such circumstances each case must be decided according to its own particular facts. In the instant case, from the evidence set forth in the record, the Court of Common Pleas and the Court of Appeals could well have reached the conclusion which they did, and by reason thereof such finding will not be disturbed.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 @ROAD, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of @Road, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Johnson,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. November 8, 2004 /s/ Michael Johnson Michael Johnson
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                            PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Catuity,
Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14b or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.

Alfred H. Racine III, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Debra R.
Hoopes, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the Company,
each certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

Date: May 11, 2007


                                        /s/ Alfred H. Racine
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alfred H. Racine III
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Debra R. Hoopes
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Debra R. Hoopes
                                        Senior Vice President and Chief
                                        Financial Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       27
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The  undersigned  constitutes  and  appoints  Jon Ehlinger his true and
lawful   attorney-in-fact   and  agent  with  full  power  of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  for him  and in his  name,  place,  and  stead,  in any and all
capacities,  to sign the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
December 31, 1999,  for filing with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission by
Ugly Duckling  Corporation,  a Delaware  corporation,  together with any and all
amendments  to such Form 10-K,  and to file the same with all exhibits  thereto,
and all  documents in connection  therewith,  with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission,  granting to such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them,
full  power  and  authority  to do and  perform  each and  every  act and  thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming  all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         DATED:   March 28, 2000


          /S/ JOHN N. MACDONOUGH
          -----------------------
          John N. MacDonough
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: (24-012)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Aeronautics Committee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting, from the aeronautics community and other persons, research and technical information relevant to program planning.

# DATES:

Wednesday, March 13, 2024, 10:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., ET.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Irma Rodriguez, Designated Federal Officer, Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-0984, or                         *irma.c.rodriguez@nasa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This meeting will be virtual and available to the public online. Dial-in audio teleconference and webcast details to watch the meeting remotely will be available on the NASA Advisory Council Aeronautics Committee website at                     *https://www.nasa.gov/​nasa-advisory-council-aeronautics-committee/​.*                     Enter the meeting as a guest and type your name and affiliation.                     *Note:*                     If dialing in, please “mute” your telephone.                

The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

—Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate FY25 Budget Overview

—Workforce Efforts

—NASA 2040

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Patricia Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-03620 Filed 2-21-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order Lansing, Michigan April 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 135962 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan

_____________ _______________ ____________ Robert P. Young, Jr. IN RE MICHAEL CHURCH, a Minor. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

_____________ _______________ ____________ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 135962 COA: 276508
ANGELA CHURCH, Respondent-Appellant. St. Joseph CC: 05-000209-NA

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the December 4, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0408 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. April 11, 2008 Clerk