alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PetrolOil and Gas Inc.

6265S. Stevenson Way

LasVegas, NV 89120

Phone702 454 7318

FAX702 434 7594

July 1,2003

 

TermSheet

 

This isan agreement between Enutroff and Petrol Oil and Gas Inc. (POGI) regarding thecompensation that POGI will pay, or cause to be paid to Enutroff forintroductions that result in completed transactions of the following nature:

-  debt    financing, notes, or loans,mergers    or acquisitions,sale    or purchase of real property or minerals rightsworking    interest partners,the    acquisition or sale of the company.**DebtFinancing, Notes, Loans**
 

For theintroduction and completion of any loans, notes or debt financing of any kindwhich were initiated by Enutroff, then POGI shall pay Enutroff $10,000 plus a12% fee based on the total value of the financing, loan, or note. For example:if Enutroff introduces an individual, company, or institution to arrange a loan,note or debt financing for one million dollars then POGI will pay Enutroff a$10,000 fee plus 12% of $1,000,000 or $120,000 for a total of $130,000.
** 

Mergersor Acquisitions**
 

For theintroduction and completion of any merger or acquisition involving POGI whichwere initiated by Enutroff, then POGI shall pay Enutroff a 7.5% fee based on thetotal value of the merger or acquisition.
** 

Sale orPurchase of Real Property or Mineral Rights**
 

ForEnutroff initiated transactions involving the sale of purchase of real propertyor minerals rights POGI will provide Enutroff up to a 1/32 Overriding RoyaltyInterest (ORRI) on those mineral rights involved in the transaction. The amountof the ORRI will be agreed upon in writing prior to closing the sale or purchaseand the transfer of mineral rights by or to POGI.
** 

WorkingInterest Partners**
 

ForEnutroff initiated transactions involving Working Interest Partners (WIP) POGIwill provide Enutroff up to a 1/32 Overriding Royalty Interest (ORRI) on thosemineral rights involved in the transaction with the WIP. The amount of the ORRIwill be agreed upon in writing prior to closing the WIP agreement and thetransfer of mineral rights by POGI.

Inaddition to the ORRI POGI will pay a fee of 10% of the ultimate value of theWorking Interest transaction that will be agreed upon in writing by Enutroff andPOGI prior to closing the WIP agreement.
** 

Retainer**
 

POGIwill pay Enutroff a one time fee of $40,000 to retain the services of Enutrofffor a period of one year, commencing on the signature date of this agreement.
** 

Confidentiality**
 

Enutroffand POGI agree to keep confidential any information pertaining to properties,mineral rights and leases, or persons that may have come to their attentionthrough mutual contact involving any transactions completed or not completed.

 

 

PetrolOil and GasInc.                                                                                    Enutroff LLC

 

/s/PaulBranagan                                                                                           /s/ Peter Nguyen

PaulBranagan                                                                                                Peter Nguyen

President
<PAGE>
                                                ACTIVE LINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                                                     FORM 10-KSB
                                                                EXHIBIT 10 (O.2)

                        ACTIVE LINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                            1840 CENTRE POINT CIRCLE
                              NAPERVILLE, IL 60563

December 23, 2002

Mr. Steven Scott
27 Mill Farm Rd.
Stoughton, MA  02072

Dear Mr. Scott:

This letter is in reference to the letter agreement ("Agreement") between
yourself ("Scott") and Active Link Communications, Inc. (Company or ACVE). The
Agreement stipulated that the Company would compensate Scott with the Company's
stock for strategic consulting services as set forth in a schedule attached to
the Agreement (attached herein as Schedule I). To date, the Company has issued
stock to Scott as follows:

      (a)   500,000 shares issued on November 19, 2002 for work performed from
            October 1, 2002 through October 25, 2002.

      (b)   150,000 shares issued on December 19, 2002 for work performed
            through November 30, 2002.

Given that Scott has failed to successfully raise investment capital for the
Company, and given that Scott has failed to negotiate acceptable compromise
settlements with any of the Company's major creditors, the Company hereby deems
the services as originally contracted not to have been performed as agreed. As
such, the Company and Scott agree to the following revisions to the Agreement:

      (a)   The two stock certificates issued for a total of 650,000 shares of
            Company stock will be cancelled effective immediately.

      (b)   The remaining stock to be issued for services as documented in the
            Agreement will not be issued as originally scheduled.

      (c)   If Scott assists the Company with the raising of investment capital
            of at least $1,500,000 by April 30, 2003, and if Scott assists the
            Company in negotiating final compromise settlements with its major
            creditors, the Company will reinstate the stock compensation plan in
            accordance with the Agreement. In so doing, the dates for stock
            issuance in the Agreement will recommence on May 1, 2003. In other
            words, the first issuance of stock for 500,000 shares will be done
            May 1, 2003.

If the foregoing correctly sets forth the understanding and agreement between
Scott and the Company, please so indicate in the space provided for that purpose
below, whereupon this letter will constitute a binding agreement as of the date
hereof. PLEASE RETURN THIS LETTER ALONG WITH THE TWO STOCK CERTIFICATES.

                                    Active Link Communications, Inc.


                                    By: _______________________________________
                                        Timothy A. Ells, Chief Executive Officer

                                    Date: _____________________________________
AGREED:

Steven E. Scott

By: ______________________________________

Date: _____________________________________
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Krish Panu, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of @Road, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004
/s/ Krish Panu
Krish Panu
#### William C. LEWIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28078.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 20, 1956.

*778J. M. Parker, Gorman, for appellant.

J. M. Nuessle, County Atty., Eastland, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The offense is the unlawful sale of beer in a dry area with a prior conviction for a like offense alleged for enhancement; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $500.

The record does not contain a statement of facts on the main trial.

Appellant contends that the court erred in refusing to accept the verdict of the jury which suspended the punishment assessed, and again erred in instructing them before they retired for further deliberation that the suspended sentence law was not applicable to the case.

The jury’s verdict which the court declined to accept suspended the punishment assessed. The court instructed the jury in writing that the suspended sentence law was not applicable to the case and referred them to certain paragraphs of the court’s charge. The jury was then directed to retire for further deliberation.

This is a misdemeanor case. The verdict suspending the punishment assessed was not authorized by law or the charge of the court and was not such a verdict as the court should accept. Therefore, it was the duty of the court to refuse to accept the verdict and to direct the jury’s attention to the charge of the court and ask them to retire for further deliberation. Caviness v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 296, 200 S.W.2d 1017; Belton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 286 S.W.2d 432.

No objection was made or exception reserved to the additional instruction at the time it was given by the court. Hence, nothing is presented for review.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-129313) and in
the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-90727, 33-21853, 33-26239, 33-47547, 33-59233,
333-00575, 333-03245, 333-18269, 333-35422, 333-70692, 333-70696, 333-118280, 333-118281,
333-118282, 333-118283 and 333-118284) of Tribune Company of our report dated Feb. 21, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial
statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this
Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in this Form 10-K.

|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2006                      |  | 

121

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit
      32**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of SpectraScience, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certifies,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 that based on his knowledge: 1) the Report fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of
      and for the periods covered in the Report.








/s/ James
      Hitchin


James
      Hitchin, Chief Executive Officer


and
      Chief
      Financial Officer





Dated:
      March 27, 2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to SpectraScience, Inc. and will be retained
      by SpectraScience, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofTake A Ride, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 3, 2006
================================================================================

EXHIIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 301, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Dated:  August 23, 2006          /s/ Mark Hlady
                                 ----------------------
                                 Name: Mark  Haldy
                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 23, 2006          /s/ Mark Hlady
                                 ----------------------
                                 Name: Mark Haldy
                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order entered March 3 1 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00331 - CV CITY OF CARROLLTON, Appellant

V. 1533 CRESCENT LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Jud icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 19 - 09123

ORDER Th is accelerated appeal follows the trial court’s February 27, 2020 order denying the City of Carrollton and Brett King, Building Official of the City, In His Official Capa city’s plea to the jurisdiction as to claims brought against t hem by 1533 Crescent LLC and granting the City and King’s plea as to claims brought against t hem by LRF1 Dallas Logistics 1 LLC (“Longpoint”)

. Both t he City and Longpoint have appealed, but the Court’s case management system has designatedLongpoint’s a ppeal as a cross - appeal . The appellate record has been filed, and the

City’s opening brief is currently due April 12, 2020. Because Longpoint is not a true cross

- appellant, we SEVER Longpoint’s
a ppeal from this appeal for administrative purposes and assign Longpoint’s appeal appellate cause number 05

- 20

- 00401

- CV . Longpoint’s appeal shall be designated as a companion to this appeal and shall be styled LRF1 Dallas Logistics 1 LLC v. City of Carroll ton and Brett King, Building Official of the City, In His Official Capacity
. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transfer Longpoint’s notice of appeal and docketing statement as well as a copy of the appellate record and this order to cause number 05

- 20

- 00 401

- CV. We ORDER appellant’s opening brief in each appeal be filed no later than April 20, 2020. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
|   | Delaware             | Page      1 |
|--------|----------------------|-------------|
|   | The      First State |        |

|    2103295  8100 081080515 You      may verify this certificate online at      corp.deleware.gov/authver.shtml |  | /s/ Harriet Smith WindsorHarriet      Smith Windsor, Secretary of State AUTHENTICATION:   694269 DATE:   10-30-08  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | State      of Delaware             |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   | Secretary      of State            |
|   | Division      of Corporations      |
|   | Delivered      04:30 PM 10/30/2008 |
|   | FILED      04:30 PM 10/30/2008     |
|   | SRV      081080515 - 2103295 FILE  |

| Ÿ | 2,000,000      shares shall be designated Series A-l Cumulative Convertible Preferred      Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Series A-l Preferred      Stock"). |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|   | COMMUNICATION      INTELLIGENCE |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | CORPORATION                     |
|   |                            |   |
|   | By:                             | /s/      Francis V. Dane |
|   |                            | Name:      Francis V. Dane |
|   |                            | Title:   Chief      Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Marc A. Cohen, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: November 8, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Marc A. Cohen                   
|                        |  |     |  | Marc A. Cohen                       
|                        |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to OPNET Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by OPNET Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6074

CECIL JACKSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH BROOKS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District

Judge. (CA-02-68-2)

Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cecil Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant

United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Cecil Edward Jackson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Jackson v. Brooks, No. CA-02-68-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 20, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED