alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the Registration
Statements  on  Form  S-8  (No.'s  333-102025,  and  333-104593)  of  Imaging
Technologies  Corporation  of our report dated October 10, 2001 appearing in the
June  30,  2003  Annual  Report  of  this  Form  10-K.

/s/  BOROS  &  FARRINGTON  APC
BOROS  &  FARRINGTON  APC
San  Diego,  California

November  12,  2003
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

PACIFIC MERCANTILE BANCORP

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

for the quarter ended March 31, 2011

The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Mercantile Bancorp (the Company), hereby certifies that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, as filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Quarterly Report), to which this Certification is an Exhibit, fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
of the Exchange Act; and (ii) the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    NANCY A. GRAY                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|                   |  |  |  | Nancy A. Gray,                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|                   |  | 
|                   |  |  |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission on its staff upon request.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.3

WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Paul F. Walsh, the Chief Executive Officer, of eFunds
Corporation (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of the
Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.                                        

Dated: November 29, 2002

| |  |                                 
| |  | --------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Paul F. Walsh

Paul F. Walsh
---

|EXHIBIT 32.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER                  
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer of AMG
  Oil Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
  2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AMG Oil
  Ltd. for the period ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and that the information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents
  in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
  the Company.

Date: August 14, 2006

| | /s/ Michael
      Hart                | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 
| | Michael Hart, Chief Executive Officer | 

---
p. 1



# OAR Box 1158 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



### Document

Number: 

# 44 ) l-C-2 0
Docket Number: 

# A-88-0 2

Printed 4/28/2008 2:34:13 PM

Sheet 44 of 349P. 2

Mi o sr 4 , 

# isss i
*> „ « t PBO^ V A-.' v 

## A-88-0 2 X-C-Z. O UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENCY Offic e o fAi r Quality Plannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park, Nort h Carolin a 2771 1



### 2 

### 3 

### MA Y 198 5

Mr . J . F . Tucke r Vic e Presiden t Carolin a Platin g - Rol l Divisio n 441 2 Whit e Hors e Roa d Greenville , Sout h Carolin a 2961 1 Dea rMr . Tucker : Th e repor t o nou r visi t t o th e Carolin a Platin g plan t 1nGreenville , Sout hCarolina , o nMarc h7 , 1985 , ha s bee nfinalize dbase do ncomment s i n you r Apri l 25 , 1985 , transmittal . A copy o f th e fina l tri prepor t 1 s enclose dfo r you r files . Non e o f th e Informatio ncontaine dInth e tri p repor t 1 s considere dconfidentia l b y Carolin a Plating , a s n o clai m wa s mad e i nyou r transmittal . Than kyo ufo r takin g th e time t o revie w th e visi t report . I f yo u hav e an y question s o r additiona l comments , pleas e contac t m e a t (919 ) 541-5601 . Sincerely ,

Al Vervaer t Industria l Studie s Branc h Emissio nStandard s an d Engineerin g Divisio n Enclosur e

/P. 3

Docke t No . A-88-0 2 Subcategor yI- C Th e enclosur e t o thi s documen t ma yb e foun d i n docke t ite m

I-B
- 5



### 3?.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1539 

To repeal section 939G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 

Protection Act and to restore Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 

436(g) repealed by such section. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2011 

Mr. STIVERS (for himself, Mr. RENACCI, and Mr. CLARKE of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To repeal section 939G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and to restore Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 436(g) repealed by 

such section. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asset-Backed Market 

5 Stabilization Act of 2011’’. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1539 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF RULE RELATING TO A CERTAIN 

2 EXEMPTION FOR RATING AGENCIES. 

3 Effective as of the date of enactment of the Dodd4 Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 

5 (Public Law 111–203), section 939G of such Act is re6 pealed, and the regulation repealed by such section is re7 stored or revived as if such section had not been enacted. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 2, 2015

No. 04-15-00038-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF LG, A CHILD,

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-02864

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's motion to extend time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellant's brief is 

due on or before April 20, 2015.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MARCOS GREENIDGE,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________

2023-1445

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 20-7820, Judge Joseph L. Toth.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ 

Before CHEN, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves unopposed 

for remand to allow the United States Court of Appeals 

for Veterans Claims the opportunity to “address the 

effects, if any, of Halpern[ v. Principi, 313 F.3d 1364 (Fed. 

Cir. 2002),] and other relevant binding precedent on [the] 

Case: 23-1445 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 08/17/2023
2 GREENIDGE v. MCDONOUGH

decision, and, if appropriate, to address in the first instance whether [Marcos] Greenidge qualifies as a prevailing party for the purposes of EAJA.” Mot. at 5.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted to the extent that the case 

is remanded to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

to reconsider its decision in light of the arguments and 

precedent raised in the motion and this order.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

August 17, 2023

 Date

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

 Jarrett B. Perlow

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 17, 2023

Case: 23-1445 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 08/17/2023
<PAGE>

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
 Network Six, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by references in the registration statement (No.
33-87208) on Form S-8 of Network Six, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 1998
relating to the balance sheet of Network Six, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and
the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 1997 which report appears in the December 31, 1997
annual report on Form 10-K of Network Six, Inc.


Sansiveri, Kimball & McNamee, L.L.P.
/s/ Sansiveri, Kimball & McNamee, L.L.P


Providence, Rhode Island
March 3, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          10,430
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,223
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                10,770
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,008
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             605
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               611
<LOANS>                                        178,420
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,049
<DEPOSITS>                                     197,399
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,395
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,001
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 231,049
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 18,765
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,246
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   708
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,719
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,850
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,147
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,572
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,006
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  53
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,675
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,675
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   10.54
<LOANS-NON>                                        457
<LOANS-PAST>                                       441
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,391
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      372
<RECOVERIES>                                         9
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,034
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,034
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 3.1**

****

|   |
|--------|
| 1      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 2      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 3      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 4      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 5      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 6      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 7      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 8      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 9      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 10     |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 11     |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 12     |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
|        |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 1      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 2      |
|        |

|   |
|--------|
| 3      |
|        |

 

4

----
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 02-2321

JEFFREY E. SIMPSON,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

CHERYL GALLANT, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. Margaret Kravchuk, U.S. Magistrate Judge]

Before

 Selya, Circuit Judge,

Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

Jeffrey E. Simpson on brief pro se.

Michael J. Schmidt and Wheeler & Arey, P.A. on brief for

appellees.

May 8, 2003
2

Per Curiam. Jeffrey E. Simpson appeals from the order below

granting the defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissing

his civil rights complaint brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

We have reviewed the record, the parties' briefs, and the

applicable law, and we discern no reversible error. Accordingly,

we AFFIRM the judgment for essentially the reasons set forth in the

magistrate judge's decision entered pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

See Simpson v. Gallant et al., No. 02-15-B-K (D.Me. Sept. 25,

2002).
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1615 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Gallium metal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Mr. HIMES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Gallium metal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GALLIUM METAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new headings: 

‘‘ 9902.07.01 Gallium metal (provided for 

in subheading 8112.92.10) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2013 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1615 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Life Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-8, Registration No. 333-
28607, Registration No. 33-59741, Registration No. 33-21807 and Registration No.
33-956, and the Company's registration statement on Form S-3, Registration No.
33-29536, of our report dated January 23, 1998, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Life Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996
and 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                     /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                        ----------------------------



McLean, Virginia
February 26, 1998
P. 1 

3M Environmental, Health and 3M Center, Building 0224-05-W-03 

Safety Operations St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 

M)2i*3L-t i 33 ;L 

REw:LsVEa 

OPPT !v 

2012 iAN 3 I P 

January 27, 2012 

Federal Express 

Director . Chemical Control Division (7405M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

Room 4146 EPA East 

U.S . Environmental Protection Agency 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Attention: Docket No. OPPT 2004-0112 

PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program 

Subject: Status Report Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between 

and 3M Company and Dyneon LLC dated October 2004 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

On November 19, 2009, U.S . EPA approved the Phase 3 Work Plan under the subject 

Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). Accordingly, and per the MOU, 3M and 

Dyneon have resumed the submittal of quarterly status reports . Enclosed for your 

information and records are two paper copies of the October 1 to December 31, 2011 

report (one includes a copy of the raw data) and one electronic version that has been 

copied to a CD (also including the raw data). 

Two paper copies of the report (one with a copy of the raw data) and a CD (also 

including the raw data) have also been sent to the referenced docket as noted in the cc 

list below. 

If there are any questions or comments concerning this matter, please contact me at 651 

737-3570 . 

Garyplohenstein 

Manager, Environmental & Regulatory Affairs 

Environmental, Health and Safety Operations 

3M - Building 224-5W-03 

St. Paul. .VIN 55144 

651737-3570 

<Ta11C1heristetT7 C( n11711n.conl CON-11-A.11,17 "10. CBI 

12 : 54 
cc : Gloria Davis - Mail Code 7405M (w/o attachments) 

TSCA Confidential Business Information Center (7407M) 

EPA East - Room 6428 Attn: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2004-01 I 2 

1201 Constitution Avenue. NW 

Washington, DC 20004-3302 

Glenda Dean - AL Department of Environmental Management 

Enclosures
#### Clarence Weldon HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28179.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 4, 1956.

Charles E. Tobin, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., George P. Blackburn and George R. Edwards, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the possession of marihuana; the punishment, 10 years in the penitentiary.

According to the state’s testimony three city detectives of the City of Dallas went to a rooming house to execute a search warrant which they had for the room of the appellant. On their arrival, appellant was absent and the detectives informed the landlady of their purpose there, showed her the search warrant for appellant’s room, and asked her to unlock the door in order that it would not be necessary for them to enter the room by force. The landlady and appellant had the only keys to the room. She unlocked the door of áppel-lant’s room, the officers entered, searched the room and found a considerable quantity of marihuana in a closet. Appellant returned to his room while the detectives were there and he was by them arrested for the offense here charged.

Appellant testified in his own behalf, admitted- that he was occupying the room in question, but denied any knowledge of the marihuana which was found therein.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting any testimony showing the search of his room and any evidence of the results of the search over his objection that the officers did not have a valid search warrant.

The state called Detective Gannaway as its first witness. At the time he was asked by the state on direct examination about what happened after the landlady unlocked the door, appellant objected to any testimony pertaining to the search of his room “unless--the prosecution shows that he had a valid search warrant” which objection was overruled and appellant excepted.

*769No search warrant for appellant’s room was offered in evidence.

The state called the landlady as a witness and she testified without objection that she unlocked the door to appellant’s room and was present during the search of the room by the detectives and that she saw the marihuana which they found in the room.

If appellant’s contention that the officers did not have a valid search warrant be sound, it still appears that the landlady testified without objection as to the search of appellant’s room and the marihuana found therein..

It is well settled that the erroneous admission of testimony is not cause for reversal if the same facts are proven by other testimony not objected to. Hence no reversible error is shown. 4 Tex.Jur. 589, Sec. 414; Machado, v. State, 112 Tex. Cr.R. 538, 17 S.W.2d 1060; Sparkman v. State, 128 Tex.Cr.R. 627, 82 S.W.2d 972; Manos v. State, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 234, 115 S.W.2d 655; Wilson v. State, 140 Tex.Cr. R. 509, 145 S.W.2d 598.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by- the court.