WA2-9_T4_HEA WTP calcs_11.04.09.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc.

Created: 11/04/2009

Worksheet Description

summary sheet table summarzing study information and WTP values

Study table table providing additional study detail

Annualizatoin calculations for the annualization of study values

Population Data state-level population data

CPI sheet CPI data for updating study WTP values

Purpose: Summary tables and calcualations in support of willingness-to-pay (WTP)

calculations under the habitat-based approach for the assessment non-use benefits.

File Info 1 of 80
Study Study Year State

North Atlantic

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow 2004 Rhode Island

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 1995 New York

AVERAGE

Mid Atlantic

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 1995 New York

South Atlantic

Dillman, Beran, and Hook 1993 South Carolina

Gulf of Mexico

???

California

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge 1991 California

Great Lakes

De Zoysa 1995 Ohio

Bishop et al. 2000 Wisconsin (Green Bay)

Mullarky 1999 Wisconsin

AVERAGE

Inland

De Zoysa 1995 Ohio

Mullarky 1999 Wisconsin

Blomquist and Whitehead 1998 Western Kentucky

Whitehead and Bloomquist 1990 Western Kentucky

Poor 1999 Nebraska

AVERAGE

summary sheet 2 of 80
Study

North Atlantic

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

AVERAGE

Mid Atlantic

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

South Atlantic

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

Gulf of Mexico

???

California

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge

Great Lakes

De Zoysa

Bishop et al.

Mullarky

AVERAGE

Inland

De Zoysa

Mullarky

Blomquist and Whitehead

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Poor

AVERAGE

Wetland Type

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$)

saltmarsh $0.0190

saltmarsh $0.0672

$0.0431

saltmarsh $0.0672

coastal plain freshwater

wetland type $0.0001

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands $0.0046-$0.0110

freshwater wetlands $0.0299

freshwater wetlands $0.0009-$0.0016

unspecified wetland type

(non-coastal freshwater) $0.0082

$0.0131

freshwater wetlands $0.0299

unspecified wetland type

(non-coastal freshwater) $0.0110

permanently flooded

freshwater marsh $0.0056

Clear Creek freshwater

wetland area $0.0037

freshwater, rainwater basin

wetlands $0.0007

$0.0102

summary sheet 3 of 80
Study

North Atlantic

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

AVERAGE

Mid Atlantic

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

South Atlantic

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

Gulf of Mexico

???

California

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge

Great Lakes

De Zoysa

Bishop et al.

Mullarky

AVERAGE

Inland

De Zoysa

Mullarky

Blomquist and Whitehead

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Poor

AVERAGE

Total HHs HHs Included

408,000

Statewide - Rhode Island

residents

73,423 East End Long Island HHs

-

73,423 East End Long Island HHs

1,258,044

Statewide - South Carolina

residents

8,725,826 Statewide - CA residents

235,721 Maumee residents

346,700

Households within 10 county

area around Green Bay

1,822,118

Statewide -

Wisconsin residents

-

235,721 Maumee residents

8,725,826 Wisconsin residents

1,379,782

Statewide -

Kentucky residents

1,379,782

Statewide -

Kentucky residents

602,363

Statewide -

Nebraska residents

-

summary sheet 4 of 80
Study

North Atlantic

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

AVERAGE

Mid Atlantic

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

South Atlantic

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

Gulf of Mexico

???

California

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge

Great Lakes

De Zoysa

Bishop et al.

Mullarky

AVERAGE

Inland

De Zoysa

Mullarky

Blomquist and Whitehead

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Poor

AVERAGE

Notes

Low end of range is for a loss of 58,000 acres, high end is for

a gain for 40,000 acres

Also provides separate estimates for San Joaquin Valley

HHs and "rest of CA" HHs

Range is WTP for different programs increasing wetlands

acres by 5-20%

Study also provides separate esitmtes for \temporarily and

seasonally flooded boomland hardwood wetland areas.

summary sheet 5 of 80
Authors Publication Year Study Year

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) 1998 1990

Blomquist and Whitehead (B) 1998 1990

Blomquist and Whitehead (C) 1998 1990

Blomquist and Whitehead (D) 1998 1990

Whitehead and Bloomquist 1990 1989

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow 2004 1997

Poor 1999 1996

Study Table 6 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Location

Western Kentucky

Western Kentucky

Western Kentucky

Western Kentucky

Western Kentucky

Rhode Island

Nebraska

Study Table 7 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Coastal or Non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

coastal

non-coastal

Study Table 8 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

316b Region

Inland

Inland

Inland

Inland

Inland

North Atlantic

Inland

Study Table 9 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Habitat Type

permanently flooded freshwater

marsh

temporarily flooded bottomland

hardwoods

seasonally flooded bottomland

hardwoods

permanently flooded

bottomland hardwood

Clear Creek wetland area

saltmarsh

freshwater, rainwater basin

wetlands

Study Table 10 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Services Addressed

all wetland services (included

fish & habitat services)

all wetland services (included

fish & habitat services)

all wetland services (included

fish & habitat services)

all wetland services (included

fish & habitat services)

all wetland services

all wetland services

Study Table 11 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Methods

CV - consider trade-off between 500 acres of wetlands

preservation and coal mining - average of all four wetland

types is $8.77 in 2008$

CV - consider trade-off between 500 acres of wetlands

preservation and coal mining

CV - consider trade-off between 500 acres of wetlands

preservation and coal mining

CV - consider trade-off between 500 acres of wetlands

preservation and coal mining

CV-WTP for wetland preservation

CV- assess public preferences for restoration vs.

preservation

CV

Study Table 12 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Original Wetland Area (Acres)

3,968

70,080

25,216

1,408

84,000

83

34,000

Study Table 13 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Acres preserved or

Created

500

500

500

500

5000

83

41,000

Study Table 14 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Results

$1.69 (total WTP per HH per year)

$4.69 (total WTP per HH per year)

$3.68 (total WTP per HH per year)

$11.21 (total WTP per HH per year)

$0.48 (WTP per acre of preserved or restored saltmarsh)

27.18 (2006$) (Value reported in Moeltner 2009)

Study Table 15 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

$ Year payment type

1990$ annual payment

1990$ annual payment

1990$ annual payment

1990$ annual payment

1989$ annual payment

1997$ one-time payment

(reported as annual payment

in Moeltner 2009)

Study Table 16 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) -

(3% annualization if

needed)

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) -

(7% annualization if

needed)

$0.0056 -

$0.0156 -

$0.0074 -

$0.0224 -

$0.0037 -

$0.0190 $0.0444

$0.0007 -

Study Table 17 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Total HHs

Total WTP per acre

per year (2008$)

1,379,782 $7,699

1,379,782 $21,497

1,379,782 $10,155

1,379,782 $30,935

1,379,782 $5,135

408,000 $7,755

602,363 $427

Study Table 18 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Response Rate HH Income

70% $40,881

70% $40,881

70% $40,881

70% $40,881

31% $55,916

$71,992

46% $44,125

Study Table 19 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Target Population (area sampled; total WTP)

Kentucky HHs and some HHs bordering

Kentuckey, three parts:

(1) HH on the western Kentucky coal field,

(2) rest of Kentucky outside of the coal field,

(3) four cities outside of but bordering western

Kentucky

Kentucky HHs and some HHs bordering

Kentuckey, three parts:

(1) HH on the western Kentucky coal field,

(2) rest of Kentucky outside of the coal field,

(3) four cities outside of but bordering western

Kentucky

Kentucky HHs and some HHs bordering

Kentuckey, three parts:

(1) HH on the western Kentucky coal field,

(2) rest of Kentucky outside of the coal field,

(3) four cities outside of but bordering western

Kentucky

Kentucky HHs and some HHs bordering

Kentuckey, three parts:

(1) HH on the western Kentucky coal field,

(2) rest of Kentucky outside of the coal field,

(3) four cities outside of but bordering western

Kentucky

Kentucky residents - mail survey

Survey administered at DMV in South Kingstown;

applied to all 408,000 RI households; resulting in

estimate of $196,000/acre of salt marsh

preserved or restored

mean/median HH income of respondents not

reported, use RI 2008 HH median income form

census data

(http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/medin

csizeandstate.xls)

random sample from Nebraska households, mail

survey. Apply mean to all Nebraska Households

Study Table 20 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Additional Notes

does not present aggreate WTP estimates

does not present aggreate WTP estimates

does not present aggreate WTP estimates

does not present aggreate WTP estimates, apply 1990

census estimate of Kentucky HHs to get an aggregate

estimates

very few surveyed had visited the area

annualized using a 3% discount rate after CPI conversion

apply 1990 census estimates of total Nebraska HHs

Study Table 21 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Do we have this study?

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes (also included in

Moeltner 2009)

Study Table 22 of 80
Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A)

Blomquist and Whitehead (B)

Blomquist and Whitehead (C)

Blomquist and Whitehead (D)

Whitehead and Bloomquist

Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow

Poor

Full Reference

Study Table 23 of 80
Authors Publication Year Study Year

Mullarky 1999 1994

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) 1991 1989

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) 1991 1989

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) 1991 1989

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) 1991 1989

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) 1991 1989

Study Table 24 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Location

Wisconsin

California

California

California

California

California

Study Table 25 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Coastal or Non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

Study Table 26 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

316b Region

Inland

San Joaquin Valley

rest of California

all of California

San Joaquin Valley

rest of California

Study Table 27 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Habitat Type

unspecified wetland type

(freshwater

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands

Study Table 28 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Services Addressed

total economic value

(1) onsite recreation value

(2) commercial use of the

resource

(3) option value

(4) existence value

(5) bequest value

total economic value

(1) onsite recreation value

(2) commercial use of the

resource

(3) option value

(4) existence value

(5) bequest value

total economic value

(1) onsite recreation value

(2) commercial use of the

resource

(3) option value

(4) existence value

(5) bequest value

total economic value

(1) onsite recreation value

(2) commercial use of the

resource

(3) option value

(4) existence value

(5) bequest value

total economic value

(1) onsite recreation value

(2) commercial use of the

resource

(3) option value

(4) existence value

(5) bequest value

Study Table 29 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Methods

CV - case study of highway expansion project in northwest

Wisconsin - 110 acres of wetlands (47 acres of tributary

system wetlands, 63 acres of isolated basins - some acres

do not provide fish habitat). Two groups, scope group not

told about mitigation services, base group told about

mitigation services (expectation that scope group WTP

would be higher) - seperate sample means based on

certainty levels - higher certainty ("definitely yes" only -

means lower WTP)

CV-loss of 58,000 acres - total WTP $26,120/acre (one-time

payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001)

CV-loss of 58,000 acres - total WTP $26,120/acre (one-time

payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001)

CV-loss of 58,000 acres - total WTP $26,120/acre (one-time

payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001)

CV-gain of 40,000 acres - total WTP $62525/acre (one-time

payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001)

CV-gain of 40,000 acres - total WTP $62525/acre (one-time

payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001)

Study Table 30 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Original Wetland Area (Acres)

110

85,000

85,000

85,000

85,000

85,000

Study Table 31 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Acres preserved or

Created

110

58,000

58,000

58,000

40,000

40,000

Study Table 32 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Results

$20.77 per HH

174

152

154

286

251

Study Table 33 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

$ Year payment type

1994$ one-time payment

1989$ annual

1989$ annual

1989$ annual

1989$ annual

1989$ annual

Study Table 34 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) -

(3% annualization if

needed)

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) -

(7% annualization if

needed)

$0.0082 $0.0192

$0.0052 -

$0.0046 -

$0.0046 -

$0.0124 -

$0.0109 -

Study Table 35 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Total HHs

Total WTP per acre

per year (2008$)

1,822,118 $14,966

785,324 $4,099

7,940,502 $36,209

8,725,826 $40,313

785,324 $9,770

7,940,502 $86,698

Study Table 36 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Response Rate HH Income

60% $46,952

51% $71,450

51% $71,450

Study Table 37 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Target Population (area sampled; total WTP)

mail survey, random sample of Wisconsin

residents

HH in the San Joaquin Valley and the rest of CA

1573 contacted households, 803 completed

interview. Ignore non-respondents rather than

treat as zero-value

HH in the San Joaquin Valley and the rest of CA

1573 contacted households, 803 completed

interview. Ignore non-respondents rather than

treat as zero-value

Study Table 38 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Additional Notes

annualized using a 3% discount rate after CPI conversion

no aggregate WTP estimates presented - implied that

should be applied to all Wisconsin HHs

present multiple values, $20.77 preferred (used in

Moeltner 2009):

base - $13.68, $24.07, and $37.38 per respondent (3

uncertainty levels)

scope - $20.77, $41.84, and $57.83 per HH

apply 1990 census estimate of total Wisconsin HHs

aggregate estimates presented for the entire state of

California, present separate HH estimates for SJV and

rest of CA

aggregate estimates presented for the entire state of

California, present separate HH estimates for SJV and

rest of CA

Study Table 39 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Do we have this study?

have 1999 conference

report, requested 1997

dissertation through ILL

yes (hard copy)

yes (hard copy)

yes (hard copy)

yes (hard copy)

yes (hard copy)

Study Table 40 of 80
Authors

Mullarky

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1)

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2)

Full Reference

Study Table 41 of 80
Authors Publication Year Study Year

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) 1991 1989

Bishop et al. (A) 2000 1999

Bishop et al. (B) 2000 1999

Bishop et al. (C) 2000 1999

Roberts and Leitch 1997 1996

Dillman, Beran, and Hook 1993 1992

de Zoysa 1995 1994

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 1995

Supplementary Studies

Study Table 42 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Location

California

Wisconsin (Green Bay)

Wisconsin (Green Bay)

Wisconsin (Green Bay)

Minnesota/South Dakota

South Carolina

Ohio

New York (peconic Estuary)

Study Table 43 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Coastal or Non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal (Great Lakes)

non-coastal (Great Lakes)

non-coastal (Great Lakes)

non-coastal

?

non-coastal

coastal

Study Table 44 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

316b Region

all of California

Great Lakes

Great Lakes

Great Lakes

Inland

South Atlantic? (freshwater wetland)

Inland/Great Lakes

Mid-Atlantic (previously applied to NA as well)

Study Table 45 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Habitat Type

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands

freshwater wetlands

freshwater wetlands

freshwater wetlands

large managed,lacustrine

wetland

coastal plain freshwater

wetland type

freshwater wetlands - Maumee

river basin and western Basin

of Lake Erie

saltmarsh

Study Table 46 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Services Addressed

total economic value

(1) onsite recreation value

(2) commercial use of the

resource

(3) option value

(4) existence value

(5) bequest value

non-use fish/wildlife habitat and

aesthetics

wetland preservation, all

wetland services

Study Table 47 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Methods

CV-gain of 40,000 acres - total WTP $62525/acre (one-time

payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001)

TEV study - mean WTP for wetland programs, focused on

wetlands within 5 miles of Green Bay; 2,900 acres is a 5%

increase

TEV study - mean WTP for wetland programs, focused on

wetlands within 5 miles of Green Bay; 5,800 acres is a 10%

increase

TEV study - mean WTP for wetland programs, focused on

wetlands within 5 miles of Green Bay; 11,600 acres is a 20%

increase

CV - for fish/wildlife habitat, recreation, and aesthetics.

Resports separate values for use and non-use; only non-use

included here. Mud Lake managed for flood control.

2,500 increase from a purchase

CV

Study Table 48 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Original Wetland Area (Acres)

85,000

58,000

58,000

58,000

5,000

?

10,000

12,000

Study Table 49 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Acres preserved or

Created

40,000

2900

5800

11600

5,000

2,500

3,000

5,500

Study Table 50 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Results

254

13.48 per HH

24.61 per HH

30.12 per HH

$0.0008

WTP median - $4.83 (mean currently report on right on annual

basis)

WTP mean - $16.74

Study Table 51 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

$ Year payment type

1989$ annual

1999$ annual for ten years

1999$ annual for ten years

1999$ annual for ten years

1995$ annual

1992$ one-time payment

2002$ (as reported in

Phase II chapter) annual

2002$ (as reported in

Phase II chapter) annual

Study Table 52 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) -

(3% annualization if

needed)

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) -

(7% annualization if

needed)

$0.0110 -

$0.0016 $0.0032

$0.0014 $0.0058

$0.0009 $0.0071

$0.0012

$0.0001 $0.0002

$0.0299 -

$0.0672 -

Study Table 53 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Total HHs

Total WTP per acre

per year (2008$)

8,725,826 $96,412

346,700 $547

346,700 $500

346,700 $306

16,179 $19

1,258,044 $112

235,721 $5,879

73,423 $4,107

Study Table 54 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Response Rate HH Income

72% $56,760

72% $56,760

72% $56,760

62% $41,457

?

50% $59,444

Study Table 55 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Target Population (area sampled; total WTP)

loss assigned to 346,700 households within a 10

county area that has Green Bay anglersaggregate values computed using a 3% dr (within

this area expected to be more frequent users of

the bay)

loss assigned to 346,700 households within a 10

county area that has Green Bay anglersaggregate values computed using a 3% dr (within

this area expected to be more frequent users of

the bay)

loss assigned to 346,700 households within a 10

county area that has Green Bay anglersaggregate values computed using a 3% dr (within

this area expected to be more frequent users of

the bay)

Surveys sent to random sample of 1,034

households within 30 miles of Mud Lake; 3 WTP

questions (1) geared toward rec, WTP for rec

access (2) bequest-WTP annually to ensure rec

and fish/wildlife available in future, and (3)

existence-WTP annually to ensure others can use

it. Low knowledge of the lake, lots of substitutes

Applied to applied to entire SC 1990census pop

(1,258,783).

Study area included 15 counties in northwestern

Ohio in the Maumee River Basin Area. 235,721

HHs in the Study Area.

in person survey, so no response rate reported

Study Table 56 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Additional Notes

Fish/Wildlife Habitat, Recreation, and Aesthetics

use value (total annual) - $34,000 for 5,000 acres

option value (total annual) - $39,000 for 5,000 acres

existence value (total annual) -$29,000 for 5,000 acres

aggregated based on total housing units in area 16,179

annualized using a 3% discount rate after CPI conversion

Woodward and Wui make adjustment based on 21%

response rate, by assuming $0 value for non-response,

no such adjustment made here.

This is the all Maumee HHs value (rural and urban). Mail

Survey.

This is the all resident value, study also breaks out by

users and non-users. East End, Long Island HHs.

Study Table 57 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Do we have this study?

yes (hard copy)

yes

yes

yes

yes

have results through

Woodward and Wui

metadata; hard copy in

mail

Study Table 58 of 80
Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3)

Bishop et al. (A)

Bishop et al. (B)

Bishop et al. (C)

Roberts and Leitch

Dillman, Beran, and Hook

de Zoysa

Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc)

Supplementary Studies

Full Reference

Roberts, Lisa A., J.A. Leitch. 1997. Economic

Valuation of Some Wetland Outputs of Mud Lake.

North Dakota State University Dept. of Agricultural

Economics, Report #381.

De Zoysa, A. D. N. 1995. A Benefit Evaluation of

Programs to Enhance Groundwater Quality, Surface

Water Quality and Wetland Habitat in Northwest

Ohio. Dissertation, Ohio State University.

Study Table 59 of 80
Authors Publication Year Study Year

Pate and Loomis 1997 1989

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen 1991 1989

Study Table 60 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Location

California

California

Study Table 61 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Coastal or Non-coastal

non-coastal

non-coastal

Study Table 62 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

316b Region

California

California

Study Table 63 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Habitat Type

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands

non-coastal freshwater

wetlands

Study Table 64 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Services Addressed

habitat services

includes all wetlands goods

and services including passive

uses

Study Table 65 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Methods

CV- three programs assessed (1) Wetland and Habitat (2)

Wildlife Contamination Control, & (3) River and Salmon

Improvement. Annual WTP.

CV - two wetland policies: (1) maintain current wetlands (2)

improve above current levels

Study Table 66 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Original Wetland Area (Acres)

85,000

85,000

Study Table 67 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Acres preserved or

Created

58,000

58,000

Study Table 68 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Results

SJV = $215.55 (1990$) (calculated values [right] base on SJV

pop)

Rest of CA =$210.77

OR=$67.80

WA=$99.75

NV=$196.01(WTP per year per HH)

$248.23 (2006$)

paper presents results for CA households (per HH per year)

(1989$) for single-bounded and double-bounded approaches

for now adjust Moeltner 1999 reported value based on CPI

Study Table 69 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

$ Year payment type

1990$ annual

1989$ annual

Study Table 70 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) -

(3% annualization if

needed)

HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) -

(7% annualization if

needed)

$0.0061

$0.0046

Study Table 71 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Total HHs

Total WTP per acre

per year (2008$)

8,725,826

Study Table 72 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Response Rate HH Income

51% $87,805

51% $87,805

Study Table 73 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Target Population (area sampled; total WTP)

Including this would be duplicative of Loomis

et al. 1991

mail survey included residents of CA San Joaquin

Valley, CA residents outside of the Valley and

residents of Washington, Oregon, and Nevada

(max of 1,134 miles away)

Including this would be duplicative of Loomis

et al. 1991

same survey as above, only "rest of CA" data

used for this study

Study Table 74 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Additional Notes

HH and aggregate WTP presented per program; current

conditions and program effects not described. Need to

base info other surveys

paper presents results for CA households (per HH per

year) (1989$) for single-bounded and double-bounded

approaches

single-bounded - $250

wetland maintenance-$257

wetland improvement-$267

double-bounded (2nd bid contingent upon 1st bid)

wetland maintenance-$152

wetland improvement-$251

double-bounded approach preferred based on paper

results & EVRI

does not describe acreage here, just describes wetland

maintenance and restoration programs

Study Table 75 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Do we have this study?

yes

yes

Study Table 76 of 80
Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen

Full Reference

Study Table 77 of 80
discount rate 3% discount rate 7%

program 1 program 1

year year no. period no. df annual value per HH year year no. period no. df annual value per HH

1999 1 0 1 $13.48 1999 1 0 1 $13.48

2000 2 1 0.970873786 $13.48 2000 2 1 0.934579439 $13.48

2001 3 2 0.942595909 $13.48 2001 3 2 0.873438728 $13.48

2002 4 3 0.915141659 $13.48 2002 4 3 0.816297877 $13.48

2003 5 4 0.888487048 $13.48 2003 5 4 0.762895212 $13.48

2004 6 5 0.862608784 $13.48 2004 6 5 0.712986179 $13.48

2005 7 6 0.837484257 $13.48 2005 7 6 0.666342224 $13.48

2006 8 7 0.813091511 $13.48 2006 8 7 0.622749742 $13.48

2007 9 8 0.789409234 $13.48 2007 9 8 0.582009105 $13.48

2008 10 9 0.766416732 $13.48 2008 10 9 0.543933743 $13.48

PV (one-time payment) $118.44 PV (one-time payment) $101.31

annual value $3.55 annual value $7.09

program 2 program 2

year year no. period no. df annual value per HH year year no. period no. df annual value per HH

1999 1 0 1 $24.61 1999 1 0 1 $24.61

2000 2 1 0.970873786 $24.61 2000 2 1 0.934579439 $24.61

2001 3 2 0.942595909 $24.61 2001 3 2 0.873438728 $24.61

2002 4 3 0.915141659 $24.61 2002 4 3 0.816297877 $24.61

2003 5 4 0.888487048 $24.61 2003 5 4 0.762895212 $24.61

2004 6 5 0.862608784 $24.61 2004 6 5 0.712986179 $24.61

2005 7 6 0.837484257 $24.61 2005 7 6 0.666342224 $24.61

2006 8 7 0.813091511 $24.61 2006 8 7 0.622749742 $24.61

2007 9 8 0.789409234 $24.61 2007 9 8 0.582009105 $24.61

2008 10 9 0.766416732 $24.61 2008 10 9 0.543933743 $24.61

PV (one-time payment) $216.23 PV (one-time payment) $184.95

annual value $6.49 annual value $12.95

program 3 program 3

year year no. period no. df annual value per HH year year no. period no. df annual value per HH

1999 1 0 1 $30.12 1999 1 0 1 $30.12

2000 2 1 0.970873786 $30.12 2000 2 1 0.934579439 $30.12

2001 3 2 0.942595909 $30.12 2001 3 2 0.873438728 $30.12

2002 4 3 0.915141659 $30.12 2002 4 3 0.816297877 $30.12

2003 5 4 0.888487048 $30.12 2003 5 4 0.762895212 $30.12

2004 6 5 0.862608784 $30.12 2004 6 5 0.712986179 $30.12

2005 7 6 0.837484257 $30.12 2005 7 6 0.666342224 $30.12

2006 8 7 0.813091511 $30.12 2006 8 7 0.622749742 $30.12

2007 9 8 0.789409234 $30.12 2007 9 8 0.582009105 $30.12

2008 10 9 0.766416732 $30.12 2008 10 9 0.543933743 $30.12

PV (one-time payment) $264.64 PV (one-time payment) $226.36

annual value $7.94 annual value $15.85

Annualization 3/30/2011 of 80
Number of Housholds Through State and County Quickfacts

1990 2000 Reference

Wisconsin 1,822,118 2,084,544 http://factfinder.census.gov

Nebraska 602,363 666,184 http://factfinder.census.gov

Kentucky 1,379,782 1,590,647 http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/21000.html

South Carolina 1,258,044

Counties within the San Joaquin Valley

1990 2000

San Joaquin 158156 181629

http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=n&_lang=en&qr_

name=DEC_1990_STF1_DP1&ds_name=DEC_1990_STF1_&geo_

id=05000US06077

Fresno

Kern

Kings

Madera

Merced

Tulare

total california 10381206 1502870

Population Data 79 of 80
to 2008

1980 2.61

1981 2.37

1982 2.23

1983 2.16

1984 2.07

1985 2

1986 1.96

1987 1.9

1988 1.82

1989 1.74

1990 1.65

1991 1.58

1992 1.53

1993 1.49

1994 1.45

1995 1.41

1996 1.37

1997 1.34

1998 1.32

1999 1.29

2000 1.25

2001 1.22

2002 1.2

2003 1.17

2004 1.14

2005 1.1 0.798507

2006 1.07

2007 10.4

2008 1

2009 1

CPI sheet 80 of 80