alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                                                     |  |                                   |     |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | --- | -
|Name and State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation                |  | RegistrantsPercentage 
Ownership |    
|U. S. Subsidiaries                                                   |  |                                   |     |  
|C/P Products Corp, an Indiana corporation                            |  |                                   | 100 | %
|United Sales and Warehouse of Texas, Inc., a Texas corporation       |  |                                   | 100 | %
|Foreign Subsidiaries:                                                |  |                                   |     |  
|The Coast Distribution System (Canada) Inc., Quebec, Canada          |  |                                   | 100 | %
|Ai-wek a.k.a Eurasia Recreational Vehicle Accessories Taiwan Company |  |                                   | 100 | %

In accordance with the
instructions set forth in Paragraph (b) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, there have been omitted one U.S. subsidiary and four foreign subsidiaries that, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not have constituted a
significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2010.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 509 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 509

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into an appropriate 
 form of agreement with, the town of Grand Lake, Colorado, authorizing 
   the town to maintain permanently a cemetery in the Rocky Mountain 
                             National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 7 (legislative day, March 6), 1995

Mr. Campbell (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into an appropriate 
 form of agreement with, the town of Grand Lake, Colorado, authorizing 
   the town to maintain permanently a cemetery in the Rocky Mountain 
                             National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OF CEMETERY IN ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Agreement.--Notwithstanding any other law, not later than 6 
months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall enter into an appropriate form of agreement with the 
town of Grand Lake, Colorado, authorizing the town to maintain 
permanently, under appropriate terms and conditions, a cemetery within 
the boundaries of the Rocky Mountain National Park.
    (b) Cemetery Boundaries.--The cemetery shall be comprised of 
approximately 5 acres of land, as generally depicted on the map 
entitled ``Grand Lake Cemetery'' and dated February 1995.
    (c) Availability for Public Inspection.--The Secretary of the 
Interior shall place the map described in subsection (b) on file, and 
make the map available for public inspection, in the headquarters 
office of the Rocky Mountain National Park.
    (d) Limitation.--The cemetery shall not be extended beyond the 
boundaries of the cemetery shown on the map described in subsection 
(b).
                                 <all>
```
#### O. C. BLOSS, Appellant, v. Astor ALSTON, Appellee.

No. 3189.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Nov. 18, 1955.

Ash & Aciden, Abilene, for appellant.

Thomas L. Blanton, Albany, for appellee.

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

O. C. Bloss has appealed from a judgment overruling his plea of privilege to be sued in the county of his residence. On appellant’s' motion, the time for filing the transcript and statement of facts was extended. Said record was thereafter filed on April 1, 1955. Appellant has not yet filed briefs or offered an excuse for such failure. Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, 414 provides that appellant shall file briefs in this court within thirty days after filing the transcript and statement of facts. R.C. P. 415 provides that when an appellant has failed to file his brief within the time prescribed the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless good cause is shown for such failure and that appellee has not suffered material injury thereby. Since appellant has not filed briefs and has not attempted to show either good cause for such failure or that appellee has not suffered injury thereby, the appeal is dismissed at appellant’s cost. Schkade v. Independent-Eastern Torpedo Co., Tex.Civ.App., 168 S.W.2d 281, 282; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Thrasher, Tex.Civ.App., 190 S.W.2d 596.

The appeal is dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-4381
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus JOSE MIGUEL MATEO, a/k/a Alec Garcia Rodriguez, a/k/a Santos Figueroa Santiago, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (1:05-cr-00290-JAB) Submitted: September 6, 2006 Decided: September 20, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. C. David Whaley, MORCHOWER, LUXTON & WHALEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Sandra J. Hairston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jose Miguel Mateo pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine hydrochloride in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (2000). His attorney filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting there were no meritorious issues for appeal, but claiming the sentence was greater than necessary because it was above the statutory minimum. Mateo declined to file a pro se supplemental brief. We affirm. Mateo’s sentence was six months more than the statutory minimum sentence of ten years’ imprisonment and near the low end of the advisory guidelines. In imposing the sentence, the district court properly calculated the guidelines range of imprisonment and considered the sentencing factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000). We find the sentence reasonable. United States v. Green, 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir. 2006). Pursuant to Anders , we have examined the entire record and find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Mateo’s conviction and sentence. This court requires counsel to inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests a petition be filed, but counsel believes such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that- 3 - a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Entravision Communications Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    WALTER F. ULLOA                   
|                       |  |  |  | Walter F. Ulloa Chief Executive Officer  
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    JOHN F.
DELORENZO                 
|                       |  |  |  | John F. DeLorenzo Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greenfield Online, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 to be filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert E. Bies, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
            Report.

Date: May 16, 2005                                By: /s/ Robert E. Bies
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Robert E. Bies
                                                  Executive Vice-President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Greenfield Online, Inc. and will be retained by Greenfield Online,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                        
|   



|Date: May 10, 2006
|------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Vanity Enterprises, Inc.. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

November 10,2004
EXHIBIT 10.6(b)

 

BANCORP RHODE ISLAND, INC.

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO

 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN

 

WHEREAS, Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. (the “Company”) desires to amend the provisions of the Company’s Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan (the “Plan”) to reflect an increase in the maximum number of Common Shares for which options may be granted under the Plan; and

 

WHEREAS, under Section 7 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company, may amend the Plan to increase the maximum number of Common Shares for which options may be granted under the Plan, provided that such amendment shall not become effective until the approval of the shareholders; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and shareholders of the Company have each approved the amendment to increase the maximum number of Common Shares for which options may be granted under the Plan;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

 

1.      That Section 5(b) of the Plan be amended by substituting the number “90,000” for “65,000” in the first sentence thereof to increase the maximum number of Common Shares for which options may be granted under the Plan.

 

2.       All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the Non-Employee Directors Plan to be executed by its duly authorized officer as of the 16th day of May, 2006.

 
|   | BANCORP RHODE ISLAND, INC. |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | By                         | :/s/ Merrill W. Sherman |
|   |                       | Merrill W. Sherman |
|   |                       | President and CEO |

 

 

Attest:
|   | /s/Margaret D. Farrell |   |  
Secretary

 

 

 

 

  |
|--------|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-20516

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARGARITA MORIN-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

(H-95-CR-216-2)

_________________________________________________________________

August 06, 1998

Before KING, SMITH, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the briefs and the record and hearing

argument, we are not persuaded that the evidence was insufficient

to support the appellant’s conviction for conspiracy to possess

with the intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 846 and aiding and abetting the possession with the intent to

distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)

(b)(1)(B). We elect not to address the appellant’s claim that
2

she received ineffective assistance of counsel on the basis that

the record is not sufficiently developed to permit a decision on

those issues. Should the appellant elect to pursue those claims

further, she should do so in the context of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255

action. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Andrea Goren, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Communication Intelligence Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Communication Intelligence Corporation.





Date:           March 29, 2011





By: /s/ Andrea Goren


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Communication Intelligence Corporation and will be retained by Communication Intelligence Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Communication Intelligence Corporation for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Communication Intelligence Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of First Security Bancorp, Inc. (the First Security) on Form 10- KSB for the
period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, John G. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of
First Security, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First Security.

|                    |  |                                                                          
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  May 14, 2004 |  | Signature  /s/ John G. Sullivan
                  Chief Financial Officer

Page 25 of 25
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Petrol Oil and Gas, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Loren Moll,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                            /s/  Loren Moll
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Loren Moll
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
November 13, 2008
#### William Howard KING, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30412.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1959.

*843No attorney for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

William Howard King, who will be referred to hereafter as appellant, is the same person whose conviction for murder was this day affirmed in King v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 320 S.W.2d 841.

■On May 6, 1958, the same day he was sentenced in the murder case, appellant waived a jury and pleaded guilty before the court to an indictment .charging him with robbery of John J. Nobile by assault and violence.

It was stipulated by appellant and his counsel and the state that the evidence in the case and that heard at the murder trial “is the same * * * and that said evidence consisted of the statements of eye witnesses and the confession given by the defendant William Howard King.”

..Judgment was rendered adjudging appellant guilty and assessing his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for life. On the same day sentence was pronounced reciting that appellant waived time for filing motion for new trial and requested that sentence be pronounced.

The record contains no notice of appeal.

Appellant has filed in this court application for mandamus to require the trial court to enter his notice of appeal in writing, sworn to on May 24, 1958, in Walker County, which motion he alleges was mailed to the trial judge. He alleges that he was taken to the penitentiary immediately after sentence, hence had no opportunity to appear in open court and give his notice of appeal, but did express his desire to appeal at the trial.

Under the circumstances we have decided that we should order that notice of appeal be entered in the trial court, and will dispose of the appeal as if such has been done.

Appellant expresses dissatisfaction with his punishment being assessed at life, when he believed that it would be 99 years. His remaining complaint is that the stipulation as to the evidence is not a sufficient compliance with Art. 12, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. which requires the state “to introduce evidence into the record showing the guilt of the defendant.”

The trial judge had heard the testimony of the witnesses in the murder trial,, and appellant had been confronted with the witnesses and had 'cross-examined them. It was not necessary that the testimony be repeated upon the robbery trial to which appellant pleaded guilty and joined in the stipulation that the same evidence be considered as the evidence at the robbery trial. The stipulated evidence was a sufficient compliance with, the statute. Ex parte Keener, Tex.Cr.App., 314 S.W.2d 93; Villarreal v. State, 152 Tex.Cr.R. 369, 214 S.W.2d 464; Shepherd v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 235, 284 S.W.2d 155; Ex parte Clark, Tex.Cr.App., 299 S.W.2d 128.

Reference to the opinion in the appeal of the murder conviction will show that ap*844pellant’s guilt of robbing Nobile, as well as being a principal to the murder of his companion, is shown beyond a reasonable doubt.

The judgment is affirmed.