alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

EXHIIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


Dated:  December 13, 2006          /s/ Mark Hlady
                                 ----------------------
                                 Name: Mark  Haldy
                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  December 13, 2006          /s/ Mary Kennedy
                                 ----------------------
                                 Name: Mary Kennedy
                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Annual Report of Digicorp (the  "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,  William B. Horne,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


September 28, 2005                   /s/ William B. Horne
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                         William B. Horne
                                         Chief Financial Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RAINEY L. HOOD,

Petitioner,

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2013-3126

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. DA831E120227-I-1. 

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Rainey L. Hood moves for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted.

Case: 13-3126 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 06/20/2013
2 HOOD V. OPM

 FOR THE COURT

 

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk 

s23

Case: 13-3126 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 06/20/2013
**Exhibit No. 15.2**

Awareness Letter from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

October 30, 2006

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 

Lancaster, Pennsylvania 

Re: Registration Statement No. 333-138034 

With respect to the subject registration statement, we acknowledge ourawareness of the use therein of our report dated October 30, 2006 related to our review of interim financial information of Armstrong World Industries, Inc. 

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared orcertified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

/s/KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
#### FLATO BROTHERS, INC., Appellant, v. James A. McKINNEY, Appellee.

No. 194.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Corpus Christi.

Feb. 24, 1966.

See also Tex.Civ.App., 397 S.W.2d 525.

Auforth & Bonniwell, by Charles A. Bonniwell, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

No brief filed or appearance for appel-lee.

GREEN, Chief Justice.

Appellant attempts to appeal from an order signed by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, setting aside a default judgment theretofore rendered by the court in this cause, and granting a new trial. Since such order is interlocutory, and not a-final judgment, this Court is without power to review it. Lynn v. Hanna, 116 Tex. 652, 296 S.W. 280; McCauley v. Consolidated Underwriters, 157 Tex. 475, 304 S.W.2d 265; Palmer v. D.O.K.K. Benevolent and Insurance Ass’n, 160 Tex. 513, 334 S.W.2d 149; Stocks v. Baptist General Convention of Texas, Tex. Civ. App., 362 S.W.2d 196; Appellate Procedure in Texas, § 2.5. See also Spikes v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 386 S.W.2d 346.

Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion for new trial, and that, notwithstanding the interlocutory nature of the order, this Court has the power on this ap*958peal to pass on such question of abuse of discretion. This would necessarily require a consideration of the merits of the appeal. Since we have no jurisdiction over this attempted appeal, any consideration of the issue raised by appellant would constitute fundamental error on our part. McCauley v. Consolidated Underwriters, supra.

Appeal dismissed.
#### John FARQUHAR, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27639.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

June 1, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Morgan L. Copeland, County Atty., Brownfield, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the possession of beer for the purpose of sale in a dry area, with a prior conviction of an offense of like character alleged for the purpose of enhancement; the punishment, 60 days in jail and a fine of $500.

The testimony of the arresting officers will be summarized. On the night in question, armed with a search warrant, they searched a garage operated by one Wilson and there found a quantity of beer and whiskey. Outside the building, they searched a 1951 Ford and found therein seven lugs which consisted of 21 quarts of beer. At the time of the search, Wilson, the appellant and several other men were present in the garage. Wilson was arrested, and the Ford was driven to the jail. The officers later learned that the Ford belonged to the appellant, and separate complaints were filed against Wilson and the appellant for possession of intoxicants.

Wilson had plead guilty prior to the instant trial and testified for the appellant. He stated that he was engaged in bootlegging at the time of the search, that he had the garage rented, and that the appellant was engaged in the used car business, used the garage as a base for his operations, and paid him $10 rent on each automobile which he sold. Wilson stated that he had appellant’s consent to use his automobile whenever he wanted to and that shortly before the raid he had placed three lugs of beer in the appellant’s automobile preparatory to delivering it to a customer. He disclaimed any knowledge of the four *289remaining lugs found in the appellant’s automobile.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, corroborated Wilson’s testimony, stated that he had no interest in Wilson’s bootlegging activities, and knew nothing of the beer which was found in his automobile.

The case was submitted to the jury under a charge on circumstantial evidence, and also they were instructed to acquit if they found that the beer in question belonged to Wilson.

The jury resolved the fact issue against appellant, and we find the evidence sufficient to support the verdict.

There are no bills of exception presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 13108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Proposal Review Panel for Materials 
Research--Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) 
Site Visit Ohio State University (DMR) (#1203).
    Date and Time: May 23, 2024; 7:30 a.m.-6:45 p.m.; May 24, 2024; 
8:00 a.m.-3:45 p.m.
    Place: Ohio State University, 191 West Soodruff Ave., Columbus, OH 
43210.
    Type of Meeting: Part-Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Serdar Ogut, Program Director, National Science 
Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-
292-4429.
    Purpose of Meeting: NSF site visit to conduct a review during year 
4 of the award period as stipulated in the cooperative agreement.
    Agenda: To conduct an in depth evaluation of performance, to assess 
progress towards goals, and to provide recommendations.

Thursday, May 23, 2024

7:30 a.m.-12:05 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)
12:05 p.m.-1:00 p.m.--Lunch (Open)
1:00 p.m.-2:30 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)
2:30 p.m.-3:30 p.m.--Facilities Overview and Lab Tour (Closed)
3:30 p.m.-5:00 p.m.--Poster Session (Open)
5:00 p.m.-6:45 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)

Friday, May 24, 2024

8:00 a.m.-3:45 p.m.--Executive Sessions (Closed)

    Reason for Closing: The program being reviewed during the site 
visit will include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
program. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: February 14, 2024.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-03419 Filed 2-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Endexx Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March
31, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Todd Davis, the President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, to the best of my knowledge and belief, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained
    in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/
    Todd Davis                    | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Todd Davis                            | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)         | 



Dated:
May 22, 2023



The
certification set forth above is being furnished as an exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is
not being filed as part of the Report as a separate disclosure document of the Company or the certifying officers.



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### T. A. STOKES, Appellant, v. H. B. HENDERSON et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 4, 1955.

Shumate & Shumate, Irvine, for appellant.

Kelly Kash and Lohris H. Stevens, Irvine, for appellees.

STANLEY, Commissioner.

The judgment establishes a line between two town lots in Irvine. An appeal was granted by the trial court, and the appellant has also moved for an appeal under KRS 21.080.

The appellant sought an injunction and damages for $5,000 for trespass. But he offered no proof on the issue of damages, and the claim must be deemed to have-been abandoned. So, the only question involved on the appeal is the correctness of the judgment as to the boundary line. A strip of land only a few inches wide and not over 75 feet long is the subject of the controversy. The record does not reveal or reflect its value. Since it is not shown affirmatively that the value is sufficient to give this court jurisdiction, the appeal granted by the circuit court is dismissed and the motion for an appeal is overruled. See Mullins v. Hall, Ky., 273 S.W.2d 831.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARVIN BREWER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief

District Judge. (CR-90-231-A, CA-95-178-1-V)

Submitted: December 30, 1997 Decided: January 15, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marvin Brewer, Appellant Pro Se. William Mark Boyum, Assistant

United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing six of

seven claims contained in his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, see 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

We therefore dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jeffrey H. Buchalter, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

September 28, 2005                       By: /s/ Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                             ------------------------
                                                 Jeffrey H. Buchalter
                                                 Chairman, President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      E-5
# Amtsblatt C 340/2016

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 340 |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 59. Jahrgang16. September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 340

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

59. Jahrgang16. September 2016

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Informationen |
| | INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION |
| | Europäisches ParlamentRat |
| 2016/C 340/01 | Erklärung der Kommission betreffend die Verordnung (EU) 2016/1627 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 14. September 2016 über einen mehrjährigen Wiederauffüllungsplan für Roten Thun im Ostatlantik und im Mittelmeer und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 302/2009 des Rates | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

IV   Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Europäisches ParlamentRat

2016/C 340/01

Erklärung der Kommission betreffend die Verordnung (EU) 2016/1627 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 14. September 2016 über einen mehrjährigen Wiederauffüllungsplan für Roten Thun im Ostatlantik und im Mittelmeer und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 302/2009 des Rates

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

IV Informationen

INFORMATIONEN DER ORGANE, EINRICHTUNGEN UND SONSTIGEN STELLEN DER EUROPÄISCHEN UNION

Europäisches Parlament Rat

| 16.9.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 340/1

---

Erklärung der Kommission betreffend die Verordnung (EU) 2016/1627 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 14. September 2016 über einen mehrjährigen Wiederauffüllungsplan für Roten Thun im Ostatlantik und im Mittelmeer und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 302/2009 des Rates (1)

(2016/C 340/01)

Die Kommission gibt ihrer Besorgnis Ausdruck, dass die eingeschränkten Befugnisse, die ihr von den Gesetzgebern übertragen wurden, die rechtzeitige Durchführung künftiger Maßnahmen der ICCAT zur Überarbeitung oder Aktualisierung ihrer Kontrollregelung behindern könnten.

Die Kommission erklärt daher, dass diese Verordnung ihres Erachtens einem künftigen Standpunkt der Kommission zur Anwendung der Artikel 290 und 291 AEUV auf die Umsetzung von Maßnahmen regionaler Fischereiorganisationen nicht vorgreift.

Des Weiteren behält sich die Kommission das Recht vor, Änderungen dieser Verordnung vorzuschlagen, mit denen die Zahl der mittels delegierter Rechtsakte oder Durchführungsrechtsakte anzunehmenden Maßnahmen erhöht wird, falls die Umsetzung durch das ordentliche Gesetzgebungsverfahren zu Verzögerungen führt, die die EU an der Einhaltung ihrer internationalen Verpflichtungen hindern würden.

---

(1)  ABl. L 252 vom 16.9.2016, S. 1.

---
<PAGE>
I, Michael A. Sumsky, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Diamond Triumph Auto
Glass, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I, are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003                  By:  /s/  Michael A. Sumsky
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2021

No. 04-21-00299-CV

IN RE Douglas C. GLENEWINKEL and Ward A. Glenewinkel,

From the 456th District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 210-921-CV-E

Honorable Heather H. Wright, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice 

Irene Rios, Justice 

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice 

On October 14, 2021, relators filed a Motion for Rehearing. After consideration, the 

motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on this 17th day of November, 2021.

PER CURIAM 

 ATTESTED TO: _______________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court