Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 39597 

U.S. Standards for grades of canned Effective 

date 

Change level 

of quality 

designation 

to single term 

Other revisions proposed 

Chili Sauce .................................................................. 10/20/53 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Corn, Cream Style ....................................................... 07/01/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Add Standard of Identity citation. 

Add Latin name. 

Hominy ........................................................................ 03/10/58 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Leafy Greens ............................................................... 09/01/73 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Add titles to Tables IV and V. 

Correct Standard of Identity citation. 

Okra ............................................................................. 07/08/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Okra and Tomatoes or Tomatoes and Okra ............... 12/24/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Onions ......................................................................... 11/02/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Add titles for Tables II and III. 

Add Standard of Identity citation. 

Peas and Carrots ........................................................ 07/20/70 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Peas, Field and Black-eye Peas ................................. 07/01/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Replace ‘‘U.S. Grade D’’ with ‘‘Substandard.’’ 

Pimientos ..................................................................... 10/23/67 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Pumpkin (Squash) ....................................................... 07/01/57 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Sauerkraut ................................................................... 05/13/63 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Spinach ........................................................................ 05/08/71 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Correct Standard of Identity citation. 

Squash (Summer Type) .............................................. 05/25/59 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Succotash .................................................................... 05/24/67 Yes ................... Update address for standards. 

Replace ‘‘U.S. Grade D’’ with ‘‘Substandard.’’ 

Put ‘‘proportion of ingredients’’ in outline form. 

The proposed revisions to these grade 

standards would provide a common 

language for trade and better reflect the 

current marketing of fruits and 

vegetables. 

A 60-day period is provided for 

interested persons to submit comments 

on the proposed grade standards. Copies 

of the proposed revised standards are 

available on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627. 

Dated: June 13, 2016. 

Dana Coale, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2016–14332 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–3629; Directorate 

Identifier 2015–NM–011–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault 

Aviation Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM); 

reopening of comment period. 

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier 

proposed airworthiness directive (AD) 

for certain Dassault Aviation Model 

MYSTERE-FALCON 50, MYSTEREFALCON 900, FALCON 900EX, 

FALCON 2000, and FALCON 2000EX 

airplanes. The NPRM proposed to 

require modification of the anticollision light bonding. The NPRM was 

prompted by a report of an in-flight 

lightning strike to the WHELEN anticollision light located on the top of the 

vertical fin tip that caused severe 

damage and resulted in the loss of some 

airplane functions. This action revises 

the NPRM by clarifying the 

applicability. We are proposing this 

supplemental NPRM (SNPRM) to 

prevent loss of electrical power and 

essential airplane functions, and 

possible reduced control of the airplane. 

Since these actions impose an 

additional burden over those proposed 

in the NPRM, we are reopening the 

comment period to allow the public the 

chance to comment on these proposed 

changes. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this SNPRM by August 1, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this SNPRM, contact Dassault Falcon 

Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South Hackensack, 

NJ 07606; telephone 201–440–6700; 

Internet http://www.dassaultfalcon.com. 

You may view this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 

3629; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(telephone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
39598 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA 98057–3356; telephone 425–227– 

1137; fax 425–227–1139. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2015–3629; Directorate Identifier 

2015–NM–011–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain Dassault Aviation 

Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50, 

MYSTERE-FALCON 900, FALCON 

900EX, FALCON 2000, and FALCON 

2000EX airplanes. The NPRM published 

in the Federal Register on September 

24, 2015 (80 FR 57545) (‘‘the NPRM’’). 

The NPRM was prompted by a report of 

an in-flight lightning strike to the 

WHELEN anti-collision light located on 

the top of the vertical fin tip that caused 

severe damage and induced the loss of 

some airplane functions. The NPRM 

proposed to require modification of the 

anti-collision light bonding. 

Actions Since Previous NPRM Was 

Issued 

Since we issued the NPRM, we have 

determined that we inadvertently 

referred to specific service information 

to identify affected airplanes in figure 1 

to paragraph (c) of the proposed AD (in 

the NPRM). In order to clarify the 

applicability and identify the affected 

airplanes as specified in European 

Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) 

Airworthiness Directive 2015–0006, 

dated January 15, 2015, we have 

removed references to specific service 

information from the applicability of 

this proposed AD. 

The EASA, which is the Technical 

Agent for the Member States of the 

European Union, has issued EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2015–0006, 

dated January 15, 2015 (referred to after 

this as the Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the 

MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition 

for certain Dassault Aviation Model 

MYSTERE-FALCON 50, MYSTEREFALCON 900, FALCON 900EX, 

FALCON 2000, and FALCON 2000EX 

airplanes. The MCAI states: 

An occurrence was reported where a 

Falcon 2000 aeroplane experienced an inflight lightning strike, which caused severe 

damage and induced the loss of some 

aeroplane functions. The investigation results 

revealed that the entering point of the 

lightning was at the WHELEN anti-collision 

light located on the top of the vertical fin tip. 

When the lightning strike hit the anticollision light, an electric arc occurred 

between the aeroplane structure and the anticollision light and created a conductive path 

by which the lightning current entered inside 

the aeroplane. Further analysis has 

determined that the electrical bonding 

between the WHELEN anti-collision light, 

Part Number (P/N) 01–0790044–09, and the 

fin tip fairing or the No. 2 engine air intake 

cover is insufficient to withstand a lightning 

strike. 

In case of severe lightning, this condition, 

if not corrected, could lead to an unsafe 

condition (loss of electrical power and/or of 

essential functions) possibly resulting in 

reduced control of the aeroplane. 

To address this potential unsafe condition, 

Dassault Aviation developed a modification 

(mod) to improve the WHELEN anti-collision 

light bonding when the anti-collision light is 

located on top of the vertical fin tip or on No. 

2 engine air intake cover, and issued several 

Service Bulletins (SB) to modify all affected 

aeroplanes in service. 

For the reasons described above, this 

[EASA] AD requires modification of the anticollision light bonding. 

You may examine the MCAI in the 

AD docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– 

3629. 

Related Service Information Under 1 

CFR Part 51 

Dassault Aviation has issued the 

following service information. 

• Dassault Service Bulletin F50–481, 

Revision 1 (also referred to as 481–R1), 

dated January 26, 2015. 

• Dassault Service Bulletin F900–372, 

Revision 1 (also referred to as 372–R1), 

dated January 26, 2015. 

• Dassault Service Bulletin F900–378, 

Revision 1 (also referred to as 378–R1), 

dated January 26, 2015. 

• Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX– 

285, Revision 1 (also referred to as 285– 

R1), dated January 26, 2015. 

• Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX– 

305, Revision 1 (also referred to as 305– 

R1), dated January 26, 2015. 

• Dassault Service Bulletin F2000– 

337, Revision 1 (also referred to as 337– 

R1), dated January 26, 2015. 

• Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX– 

108, Revision 1 (also referred to as 108– 

R1), dated January 26, 2015. 

The service information describes 

procedures for modifying the anticollision light bonding. This service 

information is reasonably available 

because the interested parties have 

access to it through their normal course 

of business or by the means identified 

in the ADDRESSES section. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this proposed 

AD. We considered the comments 

received. 

Request To Address the Original 

Grimes Anti-Collision Light Installation 

An anonymous commenter stated that 

the NPRM should address the original 

Grimes anti-collision light installation. 

This commenter asserted that any 

aircraft with the original Grimes anticollision light installation would still be 

vulnerable to inadequate bonding. 

We acknowledge the commenter’s 

request. However, we are not aware of 

an unsafe condition associated with the 

original Grimes anti-collision light 

installation. We have determined that 

an unsafe condition exists on WHELEN 

anti-collision light installations and 

must be addressed. If we determine that 

an unsafe condition exists in the Grimes 

anti-collision light installation, we 

might consider further rulemaking. We 

have not changed this SNPRM regarding 

this issue. 

Request To Reference the Revised 

Service Information 

NetJets Aviation requested that we 

revise the NPRM to refer to revised 

service information for the actions 

specified in paragraph (g) of the 

proposed AD (in the NPRM). NetJets 

Aviation stated that all service 

information identified in paragraphs 

(g)(1) through (g)(7) of the proposed AD 

(in the NPRM) have been revised. 

We agree that this SNPRM should 

refer to the most current service 

information. We have changed 

paragraph (g) of this proposed AD to 

refer to the revised service information. 

We have also added a new paragraph (h) 

to this proposed AD to provide credit 

for actions done ‘‘before the effective 

date of this AD’’ using the originally 

referenced service information. We have 

redesignated subsequent paragraphs 

accordingly. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 39599 

Additional Change Made to This 

SNPRM 

We have retitled table 1 to paragraph 

(c) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) 

to figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this 

proposed AD to meet the requirements 

of the Office of the Federal Register. 

This change is for formatting purposes 

only. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This SNPRM 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of these same 

type designs. 

Certain changes described above 

expand the scope of the NPRM. As a 

result, we have determined that it is 

necessary to reopen the comment period 

to provide additional opportunity for 

the public to comment on this SNPRM. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this SNPRM affects 

778 airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We also estimate that it would take 

about 12 work-hours per product to 

comply with the basic requirements of 

this proposed AD. The average labor 

rate is $85 per work-hour. Required 

parts would cost about $801 per 

product. Based on these figures, we 

estimate the cost of this proposed AD on 

U.S. operators to be $1,416,738, or 

$1,821 per product. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA–2015– 

3629; Directorate Identifier 2015–NM– 

011–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by August 1, 

2016. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Dassault Aviation 

airplanes, certificated in any category, 

identified in figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this 

AD. 

FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (C) OF THIS AD—Applicability 

Airplanes Configuration 

1Except airplanes modified through: 

Dassault modification 

embodied in production Service bulletin in service 

Dassault Aviation Model 

MYSTERE-FALCON 50 

airplanes.

M1853 is embodied in production or in service through 

Dassault Service Bulletin F50–241.

2 M2083 or M3094 ............. Dassault Service Bulletin 

F50-257. 

Dassault Aviation Model 

MYSTERE-FALCON 900 

airplanes.

3Group 1: M1682 is embodied in production or in 

service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900–182.

M5381 ................................ Not Applicable. 

4Group 2: M1682 is embodied in production or in 

service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900–182 

and Modification M1947 is embodied in production 

or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900–176.

M5386 ................................ Not Applicable. 

Dassault Aviation Model 

FALCON 900EX airplanes.

Group 1: M1682 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–025.M5381 ................................ Not Applicable. 

Group 2: M1682 is embodied in production or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–025 

and Modification M1947 is embodied in production 

or in service through Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900EX–19.

M5103 or M5386 ............... Not Applicable. 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
39600 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (C) OF THIS AD—Applicability—Continued 

Airplanes Configuration 

1Except airplanes modified through: 

Dassault modification 

embodied in production Service bulletin in service 

Dassault Aviation Model 

FALCON 2000 airplanes.

M331 is embodied in production or in service through 

Dassault Service Bulletin F2000–44.

M810 or M1061 or M2778 Dassault Service Bulletin 

F2000–111. 

Dassault Aviation Model 

FALCON 2000EX airplanes.

M1802 is embodied in production. ................................ M810 or M1061 or M2778 Not Applicable. 

1The excluded airplanes, as specified in figure 1 to paragraph (c) of this AD—Applicability, embody either one modification in production or 

one service bulletin in service, as applicable. 2 Modification M2083, Dassault Service Bulletin F50–257, Modification M1947, Dassault Service Bulletin F900–176, Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900EX–19, Modification M5103, as applicable, introduce fin tip SATCOM fairing, in production or in service. 3Group 1: Airplanes with WHELEN anti-collision light located on top of vertical fin tip. 

4Group 2: Airplanes with WHELEN anti-collision light located on top of air intake engine No. 2. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 33, Lights. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by a report of an 

in-flight lightning strike to the WHELEN anticollision light located on the top of the 

vertical fin tip that caused severe damage and 

resulted in the loss of some airplane 

functions. We are issuing this AD to prevent 

loss of electrical power and essential airplane 

functions, and possible reduced control of 

the airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Modification 

Within 24 months after the effective date 

of this AD, modify the anti-collision light 

bonding, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of the 

applicable service information specified in 

paragraphs (g)(1) through (g)(7) of this AD. 

(1) For Model MYSTERE-FALCON 50 

airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F50–481, 

Revision 1 (also referred to as 481–R1), dated 

January 26, 2015. 

(2) For Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 

airplanes with the WHELEN system installed 

on the fin tip: Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900–372, Revision 1 (also referred to as 

372–R1), dated January 26, 2015. 

(3) For Model MYSTERE-FALCON 900 

airplanes with the WHELEN system installed 

on the S-duct cowl: Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900–378, Revision 1 (also referred to as 

378–R1), dated January 26, 2015. 

(4) For Model FALCON 900EX airplanes 

with the WHELEN system installed on the fin 

tip: Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–285, 

Revision 1 (also referred to as 285–R1), dated 

January 26, 2015. 

(5) For Model FALCON 900EX airplanes 

with the WHELEN system installed on the 

S-duct cowl: Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900EX–305, Revision 1 (also referred to as 

305–R1), dated January 26, 2015. 

(6) For Model FALCON 2000 airplanes: 

Dassault Service Bulletin F2000–337, 

Revision 1 (also referred to as 337–R1), dated 

January 26, 2015. 

(7) For Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes: 

Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX–108, 

Revision 1 (also referred to as 108–R1), dated 

January 26, 2015. 

(h) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for actions 

required by the introductory text of 

paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were 

performed before the effective date of this AD 

using the applicable service information 

identified in paragraphs (h)(1) through (h)(7) 

of this AD. This service information is not 

incorporated by reference in this AD. 

(1) For Model MYSTERE–FALCON 50 

airplanes: Dassault Service Bulletin F50–481, 

dated August 22, 2007. 

(2) For Model MYSTERE–FALCON 900 

airplanes with the WHELEN system installed 

on the fin tip: Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900–372, dated August 22, 2007. 

(3) For Model MYSTERE–FALCON 900 

airplanes with the WHELEN system installed 

on the S-duct cowl: Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900–378, dated September 19, 2007. 

(4) For Model FALCON 900EX airplanes 

with the WHELEN system installed on the fin 

tip: Dassault Service Bulletin F900EX–285, 

dated July 18, 2007. 

(5) For Model FALCON 900EX airplanes 

with the WHELEN system installed on the Sduct cowl: Dassault Service Bulletin 

F900EX–305, dated September 19, 2007. 

(6) For Model FALCON 2000 airplanes: 

Dassault Service Bulletin F2000–337, dated 

July 25, 2007. 

(7) For Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes: 

Dassault Service Bulletin F2000EX–108, 

dated July 25, 2007. 

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone 425–227–1137; fax 425–227–1139. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- 

AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using 

any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate 

principal inspector, or lacking a principal 

inspector, the manager of the local flight 

standards district office/certificate holding 

district office. The AMOC approval letter 

must specifically reference this AD. 

(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any 

requirement in this AD to obtain corrective 

actions from a manufacturer, the action must 

be accomplished using a method approved 

by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– 

116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or 

the European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA); or Dassault Aviation’s EASA Design 

Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by 

the DOA, the approval must include the 

DOA-authorized signature. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2015–0006, dated 

January 15, 2015, for related information. 

This MCAI may be found in the AD docket 

on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov 

by searching for and locating Docket No. 

FAA–2015–3629. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 

2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; 

telephone 201–440–6700; Internet http://

www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 3, 

2016. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2016–14290 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 


sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS