alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-3271

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Elmer Hernandez-Figueroa, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 1, 2011 Filed: February 8, 2011

___________ Before MELLOY, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Elmer Hernandez-Figueroa pleaded guilty to being found in the United States after having been removed subsequent to attaining felony convictions, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1). The district court 1 sentenced him to 57 months in prison (the bottom of the applicable Guidelines range), and he appeal s. His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the sentence was unreasonable and that the court should have varied-2- downward. Hernandez-Figuero a has filed a pro se supplemental brief asserting that his family circumstances warranted a lower sentence.

We conclude that the district court t ook into account all the relevant sentencing factors, committed no procedural error, and imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. SeeGall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) (in reviewing sentence, appellate court first ensures that distri ct court committed no significant procedural error, and then considers substan tive reasonableness of sentence under abuse-of-discretion standard); United States v. Haack , 403 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir. 2005) (describing abuse of discretion). Having reviewed the reco rd under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we gr ant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________
#### Bruce MASON, Appellant, v. Ruby Mae MASON, Appellee.

No. 12930.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Sept. 21, 1955.

Lloyd & Lloyd, Homer- E. Dean, Jr., Alice, for appellant. -

John C. Mullen, Alice, for appellee.

NORVELL,'Justice.

The decree dissolving the marriage of the parties must be reversed because the evidence fails to meet the “full and satisfactory” test of Article 4632, Vernon’s Tex. Ann.Stats. With the exception of appel-lee’s testimony that appellant had called her a liar, the statement of facts disclosed no more than conclusions by appellee adduced by leading questions. Such testimony does not meet the required statutory test. McCullough v. McCullough, 120 Tex. 209, 36 S.W.2d 459; Garcia *v.*Garcia, Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W.2d 227.

Appellee urges that as appellant was present in the courtroom and did not testify, nor object to her stated conclusions or the form of the questions put to'her, an inference arose as to the existence of grounds for divorce. In fact, appellee in her brief alludes to other and further evidence she could have produced had appellant elected to take the stand and deny the allegations of her petition.

It may be, as. inferred in- appellee’s brief, that her failure to further develop her case was occasioned by a latidable desire not to stigmatize the father of her children, but, obviously, if appellate review is to be effective, we must proceed upon the record of the evidence as actually made in the court below and not upon statements in the briefs as to evidence that could have been produced. Default and nil dicit judgments are not recognized in divorce cases, but “the decree of the' court shall be rendered upon full and satisfactory *evidence** * * affirming the material facts alleged in the petition.” Article 4632.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and judgment here rendered dismissing this cause without prejudice.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Fun For You, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

November 10,2004
| Delaware(State      or other jurisdiction ofincorporation      or organization) | 94-2790442(I.R.S.      EmployerIdentification      No.) |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|

| 275      Shoreline Drive, Suite 500Redwood      Shores, California(Address      of principal executive offices) |   |  94065(Zip      Code) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|

----

----

----

|   | Communication      Intelligence Corp. |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | By:                                   |  /s/ Francis V. DaneFrancis      V. Dane(Principal      Financial Officer and Officer Duly Authorized to Sign on Behalf of the      Registrant) |

| Signature                                       | Title                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                            |                                                                                                        |
|  /s/ Guido DiGregorioGuido      DiGregorio |  Chairman,      President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer)                |
|  /s/ Francis V. DaneFrancis      V. Dane   |  Chief      Legal Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|  /s/ Garry MeyerGarry      Meyer           |  Director                                                                                              |
|   Louis      P. Panetta               |  Director                                                                                              |
|  /s/ Chien Bor SungChien      Bor Sung     |  Director                                                                                              |
|  /s/ David WelchDavid      Welch           |  Director                                                                                              |
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1590 

To provide for the disposition of the Space Shuttle Discovery upon retirement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas (for herself, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. DOGGETT, and Mr. CHAFFETZ) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology 

A BILL 

To provide for the disposition of the Space Shuttle Discovery 

upon retirement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPACE SHUTTLE DISCOVERY. 

4 The Space Shuttle Discovery shall be placed on dis5 play at the Space Center Houston in Houston, Texas, for 

6 a period of 15 years after retirement of the shuttle from 

7 service, after which time it shall be returned to Wash8 ington, DC. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit No. 15

Awareness Letter from Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

July 23, 2007

Armstrong Holdings, Inc.

Lancaster, Pennsylvania



|Re: | Registration Statements No. 33-65768 and 333-79093
|--- | --------------------------------------------------

With respect to
the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated July 23, 2007 related to our review of interim financial information of Armstrong Holdings, Inc.

Pursuant to Rule 436 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Act), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an
independent registered public accounting firm, or a report prepared or certified by an independent registered public accounting firm within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP              
|                          
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
#### Ex parte Jack WADE.

No. 27589.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 4, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. ,

PER CURIAM. :

This is an ¿ppeal from an order óf County Judge of Smith County refusing appellant’s application for bail .in a -habeas corpus proceeding. . i

The record is before us without, a statement of facts or bills of exception. In the absence thereof nothing is presented for review. ■ '5

' The judgment is affirmed.' ■ •
-NMREGULATORY EVAI1UATJON

11~

__ -AD 2010 Directorate Identifier:

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD beconsidered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES ( )explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on asubstantial nwnber of small entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is itappropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where avi tion might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( )explain NO (X)
1 of 3 10/24/2008 1:16 PM

EERE Information Center

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Technical Support Document: 

Residential Dishwashers, 

Dehumidifiers, and Cooking 

Products and Commercial 

Clothes Washers

This report provides the technical analysis and 

results in support of the information presented 

in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for 

residential dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and 

cooking products and commercial clothes 

washers. This document consists of 14 

Chapters, 10 Appendices, the Environmental 

Assessment and the Regulatory Impact 

Analysis.

The following documents are available as 

Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader.

 Title Page (PDF 17 

KB)

Table of Contents (PDF 270 

KB)

Chapters

Chapter 1. Introduction (PDF 85 

KB)

Chapter 2. Analytical Framework (PDF 194 

KB)

Chapter 3. Market and 

Technology 

Assessment

(PDF 1.4 

MB)

Chapter 4. Screening Analysis (PDF 125 

KB)

Chapter 5. Engineering Analysis (PDF 1.4 

MB)

Chapter 6. Energy and Water Use 

Determination

(PDF 842 

KB)

Chapter 7. Markups for 

Equipment Price 

Determination

(PDF 308 

KB)

Chapter 8. Life-Cycle Cost and 

Payback Period 

Analysis

(PDF 5.5 

MB)

EE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 39.2
2 of 3 10/24/2008 1:16 PM

Chapter 9. Shipments Analysis (PDF 521 

KB)

Chapter 

10.

National Impact 

Analysis

(PDF 1.3 

MB)

Chapter 

11.

Life-Cycle Cost 

Sub-Group Analysis

(PDF 20 

KB)

Chapter 

12.

Manufacturer Impact 

Analysis

(PDF 344 

KB)

Chapter 

13.

Utility Impact Analysis (PDF 31 

KB)

Chapter 

14.

Employment Impact 

Analysis

(PDF 25 

KB)

Reports

Regulatory Impact 

Analysis

(PDF 20 

KB)

Environmental 

Assessment

(PDF 59 

KB)

Appendices

Appendix 

5A

AHAM Data Submittal (PDF 322 

KB)

Appendix 

5B

Manufacturer 

Interview Guides

(PDF 52 

KB)

Appendix 

5C

The Low-Volume 

Manufacturer

(PDF 169 

KB)

Appendix 

6A

Cooktops and Ovens: 

Determination of 

Energy-Using 

Components

(PDF 112 

KB)

Appendix 

8A

User Instructions for 

LCC and PBP 

Spreadsheets

(PDF 89 

KB)

Appendix 

8B

Uncertainty and 

Variability

(PDF 50 

KB)

Appendix 

8C

Household Discount 

Rate Distributions

(PDF 179 

KB)

Appendix 

9A

Relative Price 

Elasticity of Demand 

for Appliances

(PDF 293 

KB)

Appendix 

10A

User Instruction for 

Shipments and NIA 

Spreadsheets

(PDF 77 

KB)

Appendix 

10B

National Equipment 

and Operating Costs

(PDF 843 

KB)

Contact Information

Stephen Witkowski, P.E.

Project Manager

(202) 586-7463

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

EE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 39.2
#### The State, ex rel. Board of Education of Roundhead Rural School Dist., Hardin County, *v.*Dietrich, Dir. of Edn., et al.

(No. 27549

Decided June 14, 1939.)

*Mr. C. A. Faullmer,*for relator.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. Charles F. Ohl,*for respondents.

By the Court.

The relator board of education seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Director of Education and the State Controlling Board to include in the basis of apportionment of the state public school fund *567for 1939 the average daily attendance for 33 nonresident pupils in elementary grades. The cause is before the court upon a petition, joint answer and agreed-statement of facts.

It is admitted that 27 of these pupils live more than one and one-half miles from the s'chool to which they are assigned in the district where they reside and that they are entitled, under Section 7735, General Code, to attend the school of the relator board, notwithstanding transportation for such pupils is provided by the board of education in the school district in which they reside. Under Section 7595-ld, General Code, the average daily attendance of those pupils should he included in the amount allocated to the relator board in apportioning the state public school fund. The writ will issue to that extent.

Six of the elementary pupils do not live more than one and one-half miles from the school to which they are assigned in the district where they reside and are not tuition pupils within the provisions of either Section 7734 or Section 7735, General Code. Therefore those pupils should not he included in the computation of average daily attendance in the school district of the relator. No statutory duty being imposed upon respondents with respect to those pupils, the writ will not issue as to them.

*Writ allowed in part and denied in part.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23
                                                                ----------

                    CONSENT OF LAZAR, LEVINE & FELIX LLP

            We consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated December 28, 2001 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto of Touchstone Applied
Science Associates, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-
KSB) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2001 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission into (i) the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-27659),
(ii) the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File
No. 333-424), and (iii) the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-75377).

                        LAZAR, LEVINE & FELIX LLP

New York, New York
January 29, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.M.G., A MINOR

PETITION OF: J.M.G.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 550 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Where the trial court violates the psychiatrist/patient privilege of a minor who had 

previously been placed in a juvenile delinquency facility and ordered to participate 

in ongoing mental health treatment, and where the trial court allowed, over 

objection, statements made by the juvenile to his psychiatrist and/or psychologist 

to be provided to the Sexual Offender Assessment Board (SOAB) pursuant to an 

Act 21 civil commitment procedure, is the violation harmless error?

M.D. Appeal Dkt.

18 - 2019
#### John HUGHES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27425.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 30, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s'Atty., A'ñstin, ■ for the State.

. PER CURIAM.

Possession of intoxicating beverages for .sale, in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $400.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for -review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

**JUDGMENT**

No. 04-20-00016-CR

Erica Hampton **BICKNELL**,

Appellant

v.

The **STATE** of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR4489

Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

	In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

	SIGNED October 14, 2020.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,
based on our evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Linda H. Simmons

Linda H. SimmonsChief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

JUSTO CAMACHO

- VILLANUEVA , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 3427

[ May 4, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; William L. Roby , Judge;
L.T. Case No. 562012CF002950A

.

Justo Camacho

- Villanueva, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , C ONNER an d F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF 
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ralph del
Campo, certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | I have
 reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Enzon
 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
 statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
 make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
 statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
 this report.

|                     |     |                                                         
|-------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 30,
 2010 | By: | /s/ Ralph
 del Campo                                    
|                     |     |                                                         
|                     |     | Ralph del
 Campo                                        
|                     |     | Chief
 Operating Officer and Principal Executive Officer
|                     |     | (Principal
 Executive Officer)                          

---
From: Fisher, Brian

To: "aaron_L_szabo@omb.eop.gov"

Cc: Risley, David

Subject: EPA Response to the Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: Interstate Transport Rule

 for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS (RIN 2060-AS05)

Date: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 6:42:00 PM

Attachments: EPA Response to Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO12866_13563 EPA CSAPR Update NPR.pdf

Hi Aaron,

Please find EPA responses to the summary of interagency comments under EO12866 and 13563:

 Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS (RIN 2060-AS05) attached.

Thanks

Brian Fisher

Policy Analyst

Clean Air Markets Division

(202) 343-9633