alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page **1** of **1**

**PBPK Package Supporting NMP Risk Assessment**

**Name of folder or file Description**  NMP_human_9 - 16 - 13.zip This zip file contains the files needed to run the human PBPK model, including the exposure data and plots. NMP_rat_9 - 16 - 2013.zip This zip file contains the files needed to run the rat PBPK model, including the exposure data and plots. NMP PBPK Model Quality Assurance Assessment Report n - Methylpyrrolidone PBPK QA Report 091613 V3.docx This Word document contains the model code evaluation that EPA conducted to the revised PBPK model that Dr. Torka Poet submitted to the Agency in March 2013. Residential_PBPK results and risk estimates_0915 13 This Excel spreadsheet contains the AUC and Cm ax values for the NMP’s residential scenarios examined in the risk assessment. In addition, it contains information about the benchmark dose metrics and toxic endpoints used in the assessment and preliminary risk estimates (Margin of Exposures or MOEs). Workplace_PBPK results and risk estimates_0912 13 This Excel spreadsheet contains the AUC and Cmax values for the NMP’s workplace scenarios examined in the risk assessment. In addition, it contains information about the benchmark dose metrics and toxic end points used in the assessment and preliminary risk estimates (Margin of Exposures or MOEs). NMP dose - response analysis_091613 v3 .docx This files documents the dose - response analysis for NMP, particularly the pooled analysis using Saillenfait et al.(2003) and Becci et al.. 1982. BMC calculations BMD Analysis_Becci 1982_Cmax_090513.docx BMD Analysis_Pooled Becci Saillenfait data_Cmax_090513.docx BMD An alysis_Saillenfait 2003_AUC_0915 13.docx BMD Analysis_Saillenfait 2003_Cmax_091513.docx BMD calculations using the data from Becci et al. 1982 and Saillenfait et al. 2003 .

Becci et al. 1982.pdf Paper entitled “ Teratogenicity study of N - methylpyrrolidone after dermal application to Sprague - Dawley rats ”; Fundamental and Applied Toxicology (1 982) 2: 73 - 76 (copyrighted paper) Saillenfait et al. 2003.pdf Paper entitled “ Developmental toxicity of N - methyl-2 -pyrrolidone in rats following inhalation exposure ”; Food and Chemical Toxicology (2003) 41 : 583 - 588 (copyrighted paper) Ligocka et al. 2003.pdf Paper entitled “ Contribution of CYP2E1 to N - methyl-2 -pyrrolidone metabolism ”; Arch Toxicol (2003) 77: 261 –266 (copyrighted paper) Paper supports retaining a 10X factor for inter- individual differences
#### Ex parte A. W. FRAZIER.

No. 29028.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 1, 1957.

*656No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus brought by relator seeking his release from the Texas Prison System.

On January 19, 1949, in cause No. 41S2-B in the District Court of Gregg County, the relator waived a jury and plead guilty before the court to the offense of robbery by assault. The judge found him guilty and assessed his punishment at a “term of five (5) to twenty (20) years.” Since the filing of this application, the trial court has been given an opportunity to correct any clerical error in the entry of the judgment, and, in the absence of a showing to the contrary, we must assume that the judgment before us correctly reflects the punishment assessed by the court.

The judgment is neither definite nor certain as to the punishment assessed, and for such reason is void. Ex parte East, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 123, 225 S.W.2d 833, Ex parte Traxler, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 661, 184 S.W.2d 286, and Edwards v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 301, 219 S.W.2d 1022.

It is ordered that relator be relieved from, further confinement in the penitentiary and that he be delivered by the penitentiary authorities to the sheriff of Gregg County to answer in the 124th District Court of such county to the indictment in said cause under which his conviction was had.

It is so ordered.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

p0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

136928 

GRAND BLANC VENTURE, LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136928 

 COA: 276311 

Genesee CC: 03-077456-CZ 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GRAND 

BLANC, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 10, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### V. E. BARNES, Commissioner of the Department of Economic Security, Division of Public Assistance, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Appellant, v. James NOBLE, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 3, 1955.

Paul E. Tierney, Christopher C. Frishe, Samuel H. Cole, Frankfort, for appellant.

Moss Noble, Jackson, for appellee.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

This case, involving the eligibility of the children of James Noble to receive grants of public assistance as “needy” children, is identical with that of Barnes v. Turner, Ky., 280 S.W.2d 185 except as to the nature of the physical disabilities of the father of the children. Here, the father, 38 years of age, has suffered the loss of the lower part of one leg, and an injury to the knee and ankle of the other leg, the latter injury being correctible by surgery which the father has declined to undergo. As in the Turner case, he is limited as to the kinds of employment he can engage in, but he is capable of some kinds of employment.

For the reasons set forth in the opinion in the Turner case, we think the Department of Economic Security correctly ruled that' Noble is not so incapacitated as to make his children eligible for aid under KRS 205.010(5).

The motion for an appeal is sustained and the judgment is reversed, with directions to enter judgment sustaining the decision of the Department of Economic Security and the appeal board.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996 FORM 10-K CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000727634
<NAME> COMMUNICATION INTELLIGENCE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,573
<SECURITIES>                                       752
<RECEIVABLES>                                      461
<ALLOWANCES>                                        85
<INVENTORY>                                        529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,420
<PP&E>                                           2,544
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,007
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,417
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           419
<OTHER-SE>                                       (501)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,503
<SALES>                                          1,591
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,887
<CGS>                                            1,518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    74
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (99)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,356)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-262   -        -CV

JeEwWaArRaA O. DiIlLlLaArRdD	APPELLANT	

	V.

	APPELLEE

U.SsS. BbBaAnNkK NnNaAtTiIoOnNaAlL AaAsSsSoOcCiIaAtTiIoOnN, 	APPELLEE

AaAsS TtTrRuUsStTeEeE FfFoOrR TtThHeE SsSpPeEcCiIaAlLtTyY 

UuUnNdDeErRwWrRiItTiInNgG AaAnNdD RrReEsSiIdDeEnNtTiIaAlL Ff

FiInNaAnNcCeE TtTrRuUsStT MmMoOrRtTgGaAgGeE LlLoOaAnN 

AaAsSsSeEtT-BbBaAcCkKeEdD CcCeErRtTiIfFiIcCaAtTiIoOnN SsSeErRiIeEsS 

2006-BbBCcC4

	----------

	FROM COUNTY THE        DISTRICT COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF  TARRANT           COUNTY

		------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s jULYJuly 29, 2009 judgment[DATE OF JUDGMENT] “[TITLE OF JUDGMENT].”.    The trial court subsequently granted appellant’s motion for new trial on [DATE MNT GRANTED] August 14, 2009, while it still had plenary jurisdiction over the case.  See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(e).

	On August 18, 2009[DATE OF 10-DAY NOTICE], we informed the appellantparties that it appeared the trial court’s granting of the motion for new trial rendered this appeal moot and that the appeal would be dismissed as moot unless, on or before August 28, 2009 [DATE RESPONSE WAS DUE], appellnant any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.No  No   Appellant responded, agreeing that the appeal should be dismissed as moot. [OR Neither party filed a response. has been received.]

	Accordingly, on this court’s own motion, we dismiss the appeal as moot..   [OR Therefore, on this court’s own motion, we dismiss the appeal as moot.]  See Tex. R. App. P.Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(ca),  43.2(f). 

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   MEIER, J.; CAYCE.,C C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

[PANEL MEMBERS]

DELIVERED:  [DELIVERED DATE] September 13810, 2009
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
KIK Technology International, Inc.
File No. 000-30071

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  April 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, William M.  Knooihuizen,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that:  (1) the  Report  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 14, 2004                               By: /s/ William M. Knooihuizen
      -------------                                  ---------------------------
                                                          William M. Knooihuizen
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of KIK Technology  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  April 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Kuldip C. Baid, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  that:  (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section  13(a) or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934;  and (2) the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 14, 2004                               By: /s/ Kuldip C. Baid
      -------------                                  ---------------------------
                                                                  Kuldip C. Baid
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to KIK  Technology  International,  Inc.  and will be  retained by KIK
Technology  International,  Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (a)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated this 5th day of August, 2005.



                                          /s/ Merrill W. Sherman
                                          ----------------------
                                          Merrill W. Sherman
                                          President and
                                          Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by Bancorp
Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
May 20,2015 Document Control Office (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave
. , NW. Washington , DC 20460-0001 

## 20 15 HAY 

## 2 I AM**9~** 

## 27 CBIC Control P-lumber 

# 365079

RE: Significant New Use Rule for Cobalt Lithium Manganese Nickel Oxide, CAS No. 182442- 95-1,40 CFR 721.10201; EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0922. To Whom It May Concern: Please find enclosed two compact disks containing documents related to the request to modify the Significant New Use Rule for cobalt lithium manganes e nickel oxide (40 CFR 721.10201)
. One disk contains documents clearly marked CBI. The other contains the same documents sanitized of CBI. Do not hesitate to contact me at Jay_ West @ americanchemistry.com if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jay We s t Senior Director, Chemical Products and Technology American Chemi s try Council

Enclosures: Compact Disk of documents containing CBI Comp act Di sk of documents sanitized of CBI ----, I
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In connection with the quarterly report
of Kodiak Energy, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated   below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.     the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.     the
information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.








Dated:   August 10 ,
2009





/s/
William S Tighe


Name: William S.
Tighe


Title: Chief Executive
Officer





/s/
William E. Brimacombe


Name: William E.
Brimacombe


Title: Chief Financial
Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 604

To amend title 49, United States Code, to relieve farmers and retail farm

suppliers from limitations on maximum driving and on-duty time in

the transportation of agricultural commodities or farm supplies if such

transportation occurs within a 100-air mile radius of the source of

the commodities or the distribution point for the farm supplies.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 23, 1995

Mr. PRESSLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to relieve farmers

and retail farm suppliers from limitations on maximum

driving and on-duty time in the transportation of agricultural commodities or farm supplies if such transportation

occurs within a 100-air mile radius of the source of

the commodities or the distribution point for the farm

supplies.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 604 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FOR FARMERS AND FARM SUPPLI2 ERS FROM TRANSPORTATION LIMITATIONS

3 ON MAXIMUM DRIVING AND ON-DUTY TIME.

4 (a) EXCEPTION FOR FARMERS AND FARM SUPPLI5 ERS.—Regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Trans6 portation under section 31502 of title 49, United States

7 Code, regarding maximum driving and on-duty time for

8 drivers used by motor carriers shall not apply to farmers

9 or retail farm suppliers transporting agricultural commod10 ities or farm supplies for agricultural purposes if such

11 transportation is limited to an area within a 100-air mile

12 radius of the source of the commodities or the distribution

13 point for the farm supplies.

14 (b) CONFORMING REGULATIONS.—The Secretary

15 shall amend part 395 of title 49, Code of Federal Regula16 tions, to reflect the exception provided by subsection (a).

Æ
#### Alford BOLTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27630.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1955.

*357D. R. Taylor, Jr., Center, for appellant.

Richard E. McDaniel, County Atty., Center, Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the unlawful sale of wine in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $400.. , _

Art. 666-4(b), Vernon’s P.C., makes it unlawful not only to sell liquor but also to sell wine, in any dry area.

Wine is a liquor containing.alcohol in excess of four per centum by weight, and proof an alcoholic beverage is wine is prima facie evidence that it is liquor. Byars v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 515, 229 S.W.2d 169.

Under the constitutional amendment of Art. XVI, § 20, in 1935, the legislature was authorized to prohibit the sále of wine, by name, in a dry area where the sale of intoxicating liquors had been prohibited by local option elections held under the laws of this state and in force at the time of the taking effect of Section 20 of Art. XVI of the Constitution of‘this state.

The information in.this, case alleged that appellant sold wine, to Rogers William in Shelby County, a dry area.

Rogers William did not testify upon the trial of the case.'

There is no direct testimony .that appellant sold wine to William.

The state relied upon facts showing that Hughes, a deputy sheriff, gave to Williams two $1 bills, the serial numbers of which Hughes 'made a record, with instructions to buy a bottle of wine from appellant.

Subsequently thereto, the two $1 bills were found upon the person of appellant, the bills bearing the same serial numbers as those which the deputy sheriff had given to Williams.

Outside of some irrelevant hearsay statements, as well as proof of the sale of'wine by appellant to others, the foregoing is the state’s case.

Appellant denied that he made the sale to Williams, and explained that the two $1 bills were in his possession because they had been given to him by another person who had made the sale of the bottle of wine to Williams.

The record reflects no reason why William, the alleged purchaser, was not called as a witness by the state. It appears .that he was available as a witness.

There being no evidence that appellant sold the wine to William, the facts are insufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 60 (Tuesday, March 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7332]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Postponement of Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Mountaineer Commercial Scale Carbon Capture and 
Storage Project, Mason County, WV

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Postponement of public hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the availability 
of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Mountaineer 
Commercial Scale Carbon Capture and Storage Project (DOE/EIS-0445D) for 
public review and comment in a Federal Register notice on Friday, March 
11, 2011. The notice also provided the location and time for a public 
hearing for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, scheduled for 
Wednesday, March 30, 2011. The purpose of this notice is to inform 
interested parties that DOE has decided to postpone the public hearing; 
DOE will issue another notice announcing the new date and time for this 
meeting.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 23, 2011.
Mark J. Matarrese,
Director, Office of Environment, Security, Safety & Health, Office of 
Fossil Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011-7332 Filed 3-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
STANDARD EXPOSURE REPORT Page 1 of 4

P-09-0188 Date 2/18/09

Assessor: C. Flessner

Production Volume:

USE:

OTHER USES:

Chemical Name:

Fate Assessment :STANDARD EXPOSURE REPORT Page 2 of 4

P-09-0188 Date 2/18/09

General Population and Environmental Exposure

A qualitative evaluation of the releases estimated by CEB indicates that there is some

potential for exposure to the genera l population and the environment from water, landfill and/or

incineration releases as well as fugitive air releases

. Human

inhalation, ingestion and dermal exposure may result from the water, landfill, incineration and

fugitive releases.

It is recommended that the submitter work with EPA engineers, fate experts

and exposure assessors to develop chemical -specific testing for this PMN chemical.STANDARD EXPOSURE REPORT Page 3 of 4

P-09-0188 Date 2/18/09STANDARD EXPOSURE REPORT Page 4 of 4

P-09-0188 Date 2/18/09

Environmental Releases from the Engineering Report