alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


     I, Shane Polson, certify that:

          1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Technol
               Fuel Conditioners, Inc.

          2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
               untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material
               fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
               circumstances under which such statements were made, not
               misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
               report.

          3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other
               financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly
               present in all material respects the financial condition, results
               from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
               the periods presented in this quarterly report.


DATE:    March 14, 2006

                              By: /s/ Shane Polson
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                      Shane Polson
                                      President, Acting Chief Operating Officer,
                                      Treasurer, and Chairman
### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE 

### COMMISSION

# * IN THE

OF

# MARYLAND COURT OFAPPEALS 

# * OF 

### MARYLAND Petitioner, 

# * Misc. Docket 

### AG



# * No. 

### AUBREY PAIGE POPPLETON

Respondent. 

# * September Term, 2018

,fi ORDER This matter came before the Court on theJoint Petition 

### of the

### Attorney Grievance 

### Commission

## of Maryland and Respondent, 

### Aubrey Paige Poppleton, 

## to indefinitely suspend the Respondent from the practice of law for violations of Rules 8.4(a), (b) and (d) 

### of the Maryland Attorney's Rules of Prof-essional 

### Conduct. The Court having considered the Petition, and the record herein, 

### it isthis



# _ day of

# _,2018; ORDERED, 

### that 

### the Respondent, 

### Aubrey Paige Poppleton, 

## be indefinitely suspended from the practice 

### of law in the Stateof Maryland; and 

### it isfurther 

### ORDERED, that 

### the Clerk 

### of this Court shall strike the name

### of Aubrey Paige Poppleton from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the trustees 

### of the Client Protection Fund of the Bar of Maryland andall Clerks of all

### judicial tribunals in this State 

### in accordance 

### with Maryland 

### Rule 19-762(b).
Exhibit 31.1

                   Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

I, Tim Page, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lions Capital
     Holdings, Inc. ("LCHI")

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
     untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
     under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
     the period covered by this quarterly report.

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report fairly present, in all
     material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
     cash flows of LCHI as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     quarterly report.

4.   As LCHI's Chief Executive Officer, I am responsible for establishing
     and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the
     Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for LCHI.  As such, LCHI has:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to LCHI, including its consolidated
          subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of LCHI's disclosure controls and
          procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
          of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.   LCHI's other officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
     evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of LCHI's board of
     directors:


     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect LCHI's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for LCHI's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in LCHI's internal
          controls.


6.   LCHI's other officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report
     whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or
     in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
     subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
     corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
     material weaknesses.




Date:  May 11, 2006                /s/ Tim Page
                                   ------------------------------------
                                   Tim Page, President and
                                   Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**@ROAD, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of @Road, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Krish Panu, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

August 9, 2005

 
| /s/ Krish Panu |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Krish Panu               |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
  No.                                                                           
(4)(1)  Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership
           (included in Partnership's Registration Statement No. 2-86262, 
           declared effective on March 22, 1984 (the "Registration Statement")
           and incorporated herein by reference).

(4)(a)(2)  Seventeenth   Amendment  to  Amended  and  Restated  Certificate  and
           Agreement of Limited  Partnership  dated May 31, 1990 (included as an
           exhibit  to the  Partnership's  Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
           December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference).

(4)(b)     Subscription Agreement (included as an Exhibit in the Registration 
           Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
#### Fannie T. HANNIN, Appellant, v. P. F. DRIVER and Mrs. P. F. Driver, d/b/a Drivers Department Store, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 8, 1965.

Robert B. Reed, Paducah, for appellant.

James L. Hardy, Terrell, Schultzman & Hardy, Paducah, for appellees.

CLAY, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a judgment for defendants entered upon a directed verdict.

Plaintiff, while a customer in defendants’ department store, sprained her ankle walking down a flight of stairs. Her theory of the case is that one of the rubber stair treads was worn and raised, and as she descended the heel pulled loose from her shoe. The plaintiff admitted the stairway was well lighted and that no hidden condition existed.

*751There was no evidence of substance offered by plaintiff to prove a defective condition of the stair tread at the time of her fall. She did testify that “it had little nicks out of it on the back”, but assuming this constituted such a defect as would show negligence on the part of defendants, which is extremely doubtful, this statement was based on her examination of the step several weeks after the accident. One of her witnesses testified that there was a raised or wrinkled condition of the tread, but this observation was based upon a photograph taken seven weeks after the accident, which the trial court excluded. This was properly done because there was no satisfactory proof the conditions the day the photograph was taken were the same as at the time of the accident. See Minogue, Adm’x v. Thomas, Ky., 271 S.W.2d 896.

Plaintiff practically admits the lack of positive evidence of a defect when she argues in her brief that the very nature of the accident was such that the res ipsa loquitur rule should apply. Obviously this contention cannot be sustained.

The defendant storeowners must be found negligent in order to be liable for the plaintiff’s injury. They are not insurers of the safety of their customers, although they do have a duty to keep their premises reasonably safe and to warn of any artificial, or natural condition not reasonably safe and not known to their customers. Young’s Adm’r v. Farmers & Depositors Bank, 267 Ky. 845, 103 S.W. 2d 667. When the evidence is insufficient to establish the fact essential to negligence, it becomes the duty of the court to remove the issue from the jury and direct a verdict for the defendant. Dalton v. Steiden Stores, 277 Ky. 179, 126 S.W.2d 155. Here the plaintiff did not produce any substantive evidence which would' enable the jury to find that the stairway tread was in unsafe or faulty condition at the time of the accident.

Therefore the directed verdict for the defendants was proper.

It is unnecessary to consider the question of plaintiff’s contributory negligence.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.


                          Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and
                        Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
                               (the "Companies")


                  Written Statement by Chief Executive Officer
                  --------------------------------------------
             Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             -----------------------------------------------------



I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies' Form 10-Q
periodic report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in
that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Companies as of that date.




/s/ Leonard A. Campanaro
-------------------------------
Leonard A. Campanaro
Chief Financial Officer
Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Dated: May 8, 2003










A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# GROU PIAUTOMOTIV EIN C

Marc h 4 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretary Unite d State s Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S E Washington , D.C . 

### 2059 0 

### -ORWiO N ACTIO N 

## SlO-10 ^ 

# m^- 00 3 CONTRO LNO .

Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : A s a busines s partne ro fContinenta l Airline s an d Continenta l Micronesia , I a m writin g i n suppor t o fth e carriers ' join t applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e t o Toky o Haned a Airpor t fro m Ne wYork/Newar k

(Continental ) an d fro m Gua m (Continenta l Micronesia) . I applau d you reffort s o n negotiatin g a n histori cope n skie s agreemen t wit h Japa n whic h wil l lea d t o a n openin g o fHaned a airpor t fo rU.S . carrie rservic e late rthi s year . I no wurg e yo u t o select Continenta l t o provid e servic e connectin g th e U.S.' s financia l an d commercia l cente ra t Ne wYork/Newar k

wit h Tokyo' s central/downtow n airport . Liberty - Haned a servic e woul d provid e a critica l lin k betwee n tw o o fth e world' s larges t economie s an d wil l hel p boos t trad e an d commerc e acros s th e Ne wYork/Newar k region . Continenta l has prove n it s commitmen tt o th e Asia n regio n an d t o nonsto p Toky o service , an d Haned a wil l b e a valuabl e additio n t o ou rregio n an d t o Continental' s network . Th e ne w York/Newar k

economy , million s o fAmerican s o n th e U.S . eas t coast , th e airline' s thousand s o f employee s an d hundred s o fthousand s o fU.S . consumer s wil l benefi t fro m Continental' s propose d servic e an d wil l wor k togethe rt o make Libert yInternationa l Airpor t - Haned a servic e a succes s muc h lik e Toky o Narit a has bee n an d wil l continu e t o b e a successfu l rout e fro m Newar k Liberty . Gfgi/VlVung , Grou p 1 Aut i iden t Procuremen t

Inc .

g5 0 Ech o LaneSuit

e100 Housto nTexa

s y702 4 713647570 0 Fa x y i ^ 64y 580 0
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

129079 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129079 

 COA: 261812 

Kent CC: 02-009413-FH 

ROBBIE WILLIAM WHITE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 19, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Report of Kodiak Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results

of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated:  November 22, 2010
By:
/s/ David A. WilsonDavid A. WilsonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Swift, Stephen G." <SSwift@rrienergy.com> Date: 7/22/2010 11:48 AM Subject: Re: RRI Coolwater Generating St ation - ICR Extension Request Attachments: pic19443.gif; RRI Coolwater Extension Req.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the RRI Energy, Coolwater Station. Your request for extension has been denied. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 3 of the completed questionnaire remains 90 days after receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic19443.gif)

From: "Swift, Stephen G." <SSwift@rrienergy.com>

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>, "Frank, Stephen" <SFrank@rrienergy.com>, "Whelan, Kerry M." <KWhelan@rrienergy.com>, "Ott, Robert N." <RNOtt@rrienergy.com>

Date: 07/08/2010 04:24 PM

Subject: RRI Coolwater Generating Station - ICR Extension Request

Please see the attachment for our extension request for the ICR we recently received. (See attached file: RRI Coolwater Extension Req.pdf)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT NOVEMBER 30, 1999
(UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 1999 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,818
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,188
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             61,365
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           11,243
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             51,907
<PP&E>                                             280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,182
<SHORT-TERM>                                       615
<PAYABLES>                                      10,344
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    76,587
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                              9,809
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              18,647
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,959
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,182
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                1,378
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            12,904
<COMMISSIONS>                                      478
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                    1,245
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,535
<COMPENSATION>                                   1,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,013
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         696
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       696
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Interbank Capital Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

May 13,2004
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 149 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 149

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
                 in taxes on Social Security benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2011

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 1993 increase 
                 in taxes on Social Security benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Beneficiary Tax 
Reduction Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN TAX ON SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 86(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to social security and tier 1 railroad 
retirement benefits) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
sentence: ``This paragraph shall not apply to any taxable year 
beginning after December 31, 2010.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Paragraph (3) of section 871(a) of such Code is amended 
        by striking ``85 percent'' in subparagraph (A) and inserting 
        ``50 percent''.
            (2)(A) Subparagraph (A) of section 121(e)(1) of the Social 
        Security Amendments of 1983 (Public Law 98-21) is amended--
                    (i) by striking ``(A) There'' and inserting 
                ``There'';
                    (ii) by striking ``(i)'' immediately following 
                ``amounts equivalent to''; and
                    (iii) by striking ``, less (ii)'' and all that 
                follows and inserting a period.
            (B) Paragraph (1) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        by striking subparagraph (B).
            (C) Paragraph (3) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        by striking subparagraph (B) and by redesignating subparagraph 
        (C) as subparagraph (B).
            (D) Paragraph (2) of section 121(e) of such Act is amended 
        in the first sentence by striking ``paragraph (1)(A)'' and 
        inserting ``paragraph (1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2010.
                                 <all>
```