### 73389 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 10, 2014 / Notices

28 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). the proposed changes significantly improve the quality of execution of NOM’s opening. The proposed changes give participants more choice about where, and when, they can send orders for the opening that would afford them the best experience. The Exchange
believes that this should attract new order flow. Absent these proposed enhancements, NOM’s opening quality
will remain less robust than on other exchanges, and the Exchange will remain at a competitive disadvantage.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for

Commission Action

Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

• Use the Commission’s Internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml ); or

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NASDAQ–2014–116 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

• Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2014–116. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site ( http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR– NASDAQ–2014–116, and should be submitted on or before December 31,

2014.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 28
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014–28877 Filed 12–9–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF STATE**

**[Public Notice 8964]**

**Third International Conference on Financing for Development** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of State.

**ACTION :**  Request for comments.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Stateinvites the public, including nongovernmental and civil society organizations, think tanks, educational institutions, private sector companies, and other interested persons, to submit written input on U.S. goals and objectives for the third International Conference on Financing for Development.

**DATES :**  Written comments are due by January 9, 2015.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Benjamin Thomson, Financial Economist, Office of Development Finance, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, Department of State at 202–647–9462. Comments should be emailed to Benjamin Thomson ( Post2015

_Financing@State.gov ).

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Pursuant to UN General Assembly resolution 68/ 279, the third International Conference on Financing for Development will be held on 13–16 July 2015, in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia ( http://www.un.org/ga/
search/view

_ doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/ 68/279&Lang=E ). Many of the preparatory discussions for the 2015 Financing for Development Conference have cited the potential to do more to maximize the development impact of existing development flows; leverage the considerable resources, knowledge, and expertise of a host of new partners; and truly revitalize a global partnership around proven ingredients of successful implementation. Some specific elements being discussed include data about total financial flows to developing countries,
innovation in the use of official development assistance (especially to leverage other flows); reduction in the cost of remittances; tapping domestic resources in developing countries through enhanced capacity for tax collection, broadening the tax base and boosting savings, bolstering private
investment in and trade with developing countries, curtailing illicit financial flows and fighting corruption
to ensure the efficient and effective use of resources and domestic long-term financing.

The Department of State is seeking public comments on these concerns and
all other elements related to United States interests in the Financing for Development Conference negotiations.

Dated: December 4, 2014.
Ambassador Lisa J. Kubiske,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Office of International Finance and Development, Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014–28970 Filed 12–9–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–07–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Availability for the Cal Black Memorial Airport Draft Supplemental**  **Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) and Section 4(f) Evaluation;**  **Notice of Public Comment Period; and Notice of Opportunity for a Public**  **Hearing**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.


### 73390 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 237 / Wednesday, December 10, 2014 / Notices

**ACTION :**  Notice of availability, notice of comment period, and notice of opportunity for a public hearing.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ) and Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR part 1500–1508),
the Federal Aviation Administration announces the availability and request for comment on a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) and Section 4(f) Evaluation for the Cal Black Memorial Airport. The Section 4(f) Evaluation was prepared pursuant to Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (recodified at 49 U.S.C. 303(c)).

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before 45 days from the date of the publication of the Notice of Availability by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in the Federal Register . Anyone interested in the project has up to 15 days from the date of EPA’s publication of the Notice of Availability in the Federal Register to request a hearing.

**ADDRESSES :**  Copies of the Draft SEIS may be viewed during regular business hours at the following locations:

1. Federal Aviation Administration Airports Division, Suite 315, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057.

2. Federal Aviation Administration, Airports District Office, Suite 224, 26805 East 68th Avenue, Denver, CO

80249.

3. San Juan County Courthouse, County Executive Office, 117 S Main, Monticello, Utah 84535.

4. Web site: http:// halls.crossing.airportnetwork.com/.

Written requests for the Draft SEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation, submittal of comments on the documents, and requests for a public hearing can be
submitted to the individual listed in the

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section below.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Janell Barrilleaux, Environmental Program Manager, Federal Aviation Administration Airports Division, Northwest Mountain Region, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057. Mrs. Barrilleaux may be contacted during business hours at (425) 227–2611 (phone), (425) 227–1600 (fax), or via
email at Janell.Barrilleaux@faa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Northwest Mountain Region of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as lead agency and the National Park Service (NPS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) as a cooperating agencies have prepared a Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Draft SEIS) and Section 4(f) Evaluation to address issues arising
from the 1993 10th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Decision concerning the development of Cal Black Memorial Airport. The U.S. National Park Service (NPS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) are cooperating agencies, by virtue of their jurisdictional authority and/or resource management responsibilities. This Draft SEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation does not involve any new development or project at the airport. The Cal Black Memorial Airport opened in April 1992.

Halls Crossing Airport was located within the boundary of the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, a unit of the National Park Service (NPS). Due to safety issues with that airport, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared concerning the development of a replacement airport. In 1990, the FAA issued a Draft and Final EIS for the development of a replacement Airport. In August 1990,
the FAA issued a record of decision approving the development of Cal Black Memorial Airport. The FAA determined
in the record of decision that the use of the BLM lands upon which the airport was built was reasonably necessary for the project. Accordingly, the BLM issued a Patent for the airport land to San Juan County on September 25, 1990. In reaching its approval, the FAA determined that no significant impacts would result from the new airport to the recreational experience of visitors to the
recreational area.

In 1990, the National Parks and Conservation Association (NPCA), et al. brought suit against the FAA concerning the adequacy of the EIS and the adequacy of the BLM Plan Amendment and land transfer process. In its July 7, 1993, decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, remanded the EIS
decision back to the FAA and BLM for further environmental analysis of aircraft noise impacts to the recreational use of public lands and the BLM’s plan
amendment and transfer of land.

On November 17, 2008 the BLM
issued the Monticello Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan. The document provides guidance for the management of Federal lands administered by the BLM in San Juan County and a small portion of Grant County in southeast Utah and includes provisions for the disposal of the Cal Black Memorial Airport property.

Thus, the purpose of the Draft SEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation is to address the requirements of the U.S. Court of Appeals findings. The scope of the Draft SEIS and Section 4(f) Evaluation includes: (1) The measurement of actual
aircraft noise levels in GCNRA and visitor survey, (2) an updated evaluation of existing and future aircraft noise levels; (3) a Section 4(f) evaluation using the updated noise analysis; and (4) an analysis on potential cumulative effects.

The FAA encourages all interested parties to provide comments concerning the scope and content of the Draft SEIS. Comments should be as specific as possible and address the analysis of potential environmental impacts and the adequacy of the proposed action. Reviewers should organize their participation so that it is meaningful and makes the agency aware of the viewer’s interests and concerns using quotations and other specific references
to the text of the Draft SEIS and related
documents. Matters that could have been raised with specificity during the comment period on the Draft SEIS may not be considered if they are raised for
the first time later in the decision process. This commenting procedure is
intended to ensure that substantive
comments and concerns are made available to the FAA in a timely manner so that the FAA has the opportunity to
address them.

Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, be advised that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold from public review your personal identifying information, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.

Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 3, 2014.
Carol Suomi,
Acting Division Manager, Airports Division, Northwest Mountain Region.

[FR Doc. 2014–28869 Filed 12–9–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Highway Administration**

**Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in California** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.

**SUMMARY :**  The FHWA, on behalf of Caltrans, is issuing this notice to announce actions taken by Caltrans that