alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 7, 2018

s1031 

# Order

Clerk November 7, 2018

157918

SC: 157918

In re PILAND, Minors. COA: 340754 Ingham CC Family Division:

17

- 000591

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.3 05(H)(1).

The petitioner shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the respondents are entitled to a jury instruction based on MCL 722.634, which states: “A parent or guardian legitimately practic ing his religious beliefs who thereby does not provide specified medical treatment for a child, for that reason alone shall not be considered a negligent parent or guardian;” and (2) for purposes of this determination, the distinction, if any, between the terms “neglects” and “refuses” in MCL 712A.2(b)(1), where the family court’s jurisdiction is sought on the basis of the parent’s failure to obtain medical care for a child. In addition to the brief, the petitioner shall electronically file an appendix con forming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). Respondents and the lawyer

- guardian ad litem shall file supplemental briefs within 21 days of being served with the p etitioner’s brief. The respondents shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use of the appendix filed by the petitioner. A reply, if any, must be filed by the petitioner within 14 days of being served with the b riefs of the respondents and the lawyer

- guardian ad litem. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Children’s Law and Family Law Sections of the State Bar of Michigan are

invited to file brief s amicus curiae. Ot her persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to

file briefs amicus curiae.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1437 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to make 

a technical correction relating to stainless steel single-piece exhaust gas 

manifolds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 7, 2011 

Mr. THOMPSON of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to make a technical correction relating to stainless 

steel single-piece exhaust gas manifolds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION RELATING TO STAIN4 LESS STEEL SINGLE-PIECE EXHAUST GAS 

5 MANIFOLDS. 

6 (a) STAINLESS STEEL SINGLE-PIECE EXHAUST GAS

7 MANIFOLDS.—Heading 9902.40.94 of the Harmonized 

8 Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended in the 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1437 IH

1 article description column by striking ‘‘9902.01.50’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘8409.91.50’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendment made by 

5 this section applies to goods entered, or withdrawn 

6 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

7 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (2) RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.— 

9 (A) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sec10 tion 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

11 1514) or any other provision of law and subject 

12 to subparagraph (B), the entry of a good de13 scribed in heading 9902.40.94 of the Har14 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States 

15 (as amended by this section)— 

16 (i) which was made on or after Janu17 ary 1, 2010, and before the 15th day after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act, and 

19 (ii) with respect to which there would 

20 have been no duty or a reduced duty (as 

21 the case may be) if the amendment or 

22 amendments made by this section applied 

23 to such entry, 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1437 IH

1 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as though the 

2 entry had been made on the 15th day after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act. 

4 (B) REQUESTS.—A liquidation or reliqui5 dation may be made under subparagraph (A) 

6 with respect to an entry only if a request there7 for is filed with U.S. Customs and Border Pro8 tection not later than 180 days after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act that contains suffi10 cient information to enable U.S. Customs and 

11 Border Protection— 

12 (i) to locate the entry; or 

13 (ii) to reconstruct the entry if it can14 not be located. 

15 (C) PAYMENT OF AMOUNTS OWED.—Any 

16 amounts owed by the United States pursuant to 

17 the liquidation or reliquidation of an entry of a 

18 good under subparagraph (A) shall be paid, 

19 without interest, not later than 90 days after 

20 the date of the liquidation or reliquidation (as 

21 the case may be). 

22 (D) DEFINITION.—As used in this para23 graph, the term ‘‘entry’’ includes a withdrawal 

24 from warehouse for consumption. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) each of the
undersigned officer(s) of Accelr8 Technology Corporation, a Colorado corporation
(the "Corporation"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2007 (the
"Form 10-KSB") of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



Dated: October 29, 2007                     /s/ Thomas V. Geimer
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Thomas V. Geimer
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
#### Charles JACKSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29253.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 13, 1957.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for carrying a pistol; the punishment, a fine of $100.

Both the complaint and information charge that the appellant did unlawfully carry “on or about” his person a pistol.

A complaint and information which charges that the accused did carry on or about his person a pistol, because of the use of the word “or” rather than the word “and”, renders such allegation uncertain and the complaint and information defective. Art. 483, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; 44 Tex. Jur. p. 477, Sec. 34; 2 Branch (2d Ed.) Sec. 975; Evage v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 318, 125 S.W.2d 295; Wilson v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 570, 209 S.W.2d 598; Scott v. State, 153 Tex.Cr.R. 492, 221 S.W.2d 608.

Because of the insufficiency of the complaint and information, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
<MULTIPLIER>           1000

       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          383
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    17
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                130
<PP&E>                                       10,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                4,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                6,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           133
<BONDS>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (70)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  6,954
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1,232
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              671
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

        

</TABLE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10.4  


 
 

CONSENT OF DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON    
    


June
28, 2004 


        We
hereby consent to the references to our firm and the inclusion of information derived from our report entitled "Report as of December 31, 2003, on Reserves of Certain
Properties attributable to Repsol YPF," in Section 2.2.1.1 Oil and Gas Reserves in Repsol YPF, S.A.'s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003
and in the Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities (unaudited information) in the Consolidated Financial Statements included therein. We also consent to the
references to our firm and the inclusion of information derived from our report through incorporation by reference of the named Form 20-F in the Registration Statements Nos.
333-12254 and 333-10668 filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 



	 	 	Very truly yours,
	

 	
 	
/s/  DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON      



DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON













QuickLinks


CONSENT OF DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                            PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with Catuity,
Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "Report") for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14b or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.

Alfred H. Racine III, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and John H.
Lowry, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, each certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005


                                        /s/ Alfred H. Racine III
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Alfred H. Racine III
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ John H. Lowry
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John H. Lowry
                                        Chief Financial Officer

Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
10.14
  AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 
 
 This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT  (“Amendment”) is entered into as of October 1, 2007 among
Cadiz Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and
O'Donnell Iselin, II (“Iselin”).  The
parties to this Amendment are hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as
the "Parties".
 
 
 RECITALS:
 
 WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into
an Employment Agreement as of September 12, 2005 (the "Agreement"), with a
commencement date of October 3, 2005 (the "Commencement Date"); and
 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend
the Agreement in certain respects;
 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
above recitals, the promises and the mutual representations, warranties,
covenants and agreements herein contained, the Parties hereby agree as
follows.  Defined terms used herein shall, if not otherwise defined in
this Amendment, have the same meaning as set forth in the
Agreement.
 
 1.           Payments following
Termination.  Section 6(b)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby
amended in its entirety to read as follows:
 
 "ii.In the event of termination of this
Agreement by the Company following a Change in Control pursuant to Section
(a)(ii) above, which Change in Control occurs within forty-eight (48) months of
the Commencement Date, Iselin shall be entitled to receive for a period of
twelve (12) months following the effective date of termination, as though Iselin
were continuing to provide services to the Company under this Agreement (i) base
compensation as set forth in Section 4 above and (ii) all fringe benefits as
described in Section 5(d) above to the extent that such benefits can then
lawfully be made available by the Company (or the Company’s successor in
interest) to Iselin."
 
 2.           Existing
Agreement.  Except as otherwise amended or modified herein or
hereby, the provisions of the Agreement are hereby reaffirmed and shall remain
in full force and effect.
   IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed and delivered by their proper and duly authorized officers as of the
day and year first above written.
  CADIZ
INC.
  By:
 Keith Brackpool, Chief Executive Officer
   ISELIN
  By:
 O'Donnell
Iselin II
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE OF THE ORPHANS COURT DIVISION OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : No. 328 JUDICIAL CLASSIFICATION DOCKET

**ORDER**

**PER CURIA M**  **AN D**  **NOW**, this 18TH day of December 2014, in accordance with the general supervisory powers vested in this Court by Article V, Section 10 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, the Honorable Matthew D. Carrafiello is hereby appointed as Administrative Judge of the Orphans Court Division of the First Judicial District of Pennsylvania for a period of three years or at the pleasure of the Court, effective January 1, 201 5

.
#### In re: Albert S. HEATON, Debtor Albert S. Heaton v. Ford Motor Credit Robert H. Holber, Esquire, Frederic J. Baker, Esquire, Trustees Albert S. Heaton, Appellant. In re: Darlene A. Heleva, Debtor Darlene A. Heleva, Appellant

No. 01—4002, 01-4003.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Argued June 28, 2002.

Filed Aug. 21, 2002.

*507Dexter K. Case (Argued), Reading, PA, for Appellant.

Kevin H. Buraks, David E. Stern, (Argued), Wolf, Block, Schorr *&*Solis-Cohen, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.

Before AMBRO, STAPLETON and CUDAHY,* Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, United States Circuit Judge for the for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

For essentially the reasons set out in Judge Waldman’s comprehensive Memorandum Orders, dated October 1, 2001, and September 28, 2001, respectively, we affirm the District Court’s judgments.
Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION
                     PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bancorp Rhode Island,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (a) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated this 8th day of November, 2004.




                                       /s/ Albert R. Rietheimer
                                       ------------------------
                                           Albert R. Rietheimer
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                  and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and will be retained by
Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hesperia Holding, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Edison, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

          1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

          2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

| /s/ Michael Edison                             |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Michael Edison                                                                                                                                                                             |
| Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                    |
| September 9, 2005                                                                                                                                                                          |
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**@ROAD, INC.**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of @Road, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Krish Panu, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 7, 2006
| /s/ Krish Panu | ** ** |
|--------------------------|------------|
|                     |
| Krish Panu               |
| Chief Executive  Officer |

 

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1571 

To ban the sale of certain synthetic drugs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 15, 2011 

Mrs. ADAMS (for herself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Mr. POSEY, Ms. FUDGE, Ms. WILSON of 

Florida, Mr. STIVERS, Ms. HANABUSA, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON

of Texas, Mrs. ELLMERS, Mr. WEST, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. ROSS of 

Florida, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. MICA, Mr. WESTMORELAND, 

Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. 

SOUTHERLAND, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. MCHENRY, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. RIVERA, Mr. 

BARLETTA, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, and Mr. BACHUS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To ban the sale of certain synthetic drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Combating Dangerous 

5 Synthetic Stimulants Act of 2011’’. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1571 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT. 

2 Schedule I of section 202(c) of the Controlled Sub3 stances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)) is amended in subsection 

4 (c) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(18) 4-methylmethcathinone (Mephedrone). 

6 ‘‘(19) 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone 

7 (MDPV).’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements of National Home Health Care Corp.  on Forms S-8  (Registration  Nos.
033-61315 and 333-46076) of our report dated October 2, 2002 with respect to the
consolidated  financial  statements  of  National  Home  Health  Care Corp.  and
subsidiaries  as of July 31,  2002 and 2001  and for the two  years  then  ended
included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2002.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
---------------------
BDO Seidman, LLP
Valhalla, New York
October 2, 2002
#### Underwood et al., Civil Service Commissioners of City of Akron, Appellants, *v.*Isham, Judge, et al., Appellees.

(No. 27519

Decided April 26, 1939.)

*Mr. Wade BeWoody,*director of law, and *Mr. Harold L. Mull,*for appellants.

*Messrs. Bailey & Bailey,*for Nicholas J. Williams and W. W. Matthias, appellees.

*Messrs. Schwab & Hinton,*for Walter B. Bice and A. J. Fultz, appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in, said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.