alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-2006
GERALDINE TALLEY HOBBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BENEFICIAL/HOUSEHOLD MEMBER HSBC GROUP; GLASSER AND GLASSER LAW FIRM, Defendants - Appellees.

No. 05-2007
GERALDINE TALLEY HOBBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF LOGAN PARK, Logan Park Group Corporation; GEORGE PASTOR GEORGE SPICER; MRS. SPICER; RENEE CRANDALL BAKER; MICHAEL BAKER, Deacon; UNKNOWN, An unknown party who attended the sale and any additional parties who were involved in the acquisition of my family property, for the purpose of demolishing for a parking lot - namely Trustees, Defendants - Appellees.- 2 - No. 05-2008
GERALDINE TALLEY HOBBY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BENEFICIAL; CITY OF NORFOLK, City Attorney; THE NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; DIVISION OF NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION; FIRE MARSHALL DIVISION; DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES, Division of Water Accounts; TITUSTOWN CIVIC LEAGUE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-05-238-JBF-TEM; CA-05-247-JBF-TEM; CA-05-274-JBF-FBS) Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 25, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Geraldine Talley Hobby, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Geraldine Hobby seeks to appeal from the district court’s orders denying her motions to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her civil actions for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hobby v. Beneficial Household No. CA-05-238-JBF-TEM; Hobby v. First Baptist Church , No. CA-05-247-JBF-TEM, Hobby v. Beneficial , No. CA-05-274-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2005). We grant Hobby’s motions to amend and file her informal brief out of time and deny her motion to transfer and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 AT ROAD, INC. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of At Road, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Krish Panu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. May 10, 2004 /s/ Krish Panu Krish Panu
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7146

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MEASHA LAMONT FEARRINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-01-344-1; CA-03-1081-1)

Submitted: November 4, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Measha Lamont Fearrington, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis

Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Measha Lamont Fearrington seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Fearrington has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 133 ) ll-E-9 3 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07

AM Sheet 133 of 264P. 2 04/14/199 7 15:2 8 1610495593 4 0414/S 7 15:4 5 ©1919941023 4 TAYLO R INDUSTRIE S PE S RT P N C PAG E 0 2 @002/00 2 

## A 945 2 Il-E~f 3 Contac tRepor t Plasti c Composite s NESHA P From : Date : Contact : Company : Gre g LaFlam , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Apri l 1,199 7 Mr . Bruce Taylo r Taylo r Industries , Inc. , Parlcerford , P A Telephon e Numbe r (610)495-526 1

Contac tSummary : Th e compan y produces bat

h product s using polymer castin g an d ge l coatin g processes . Mr . Taylo r verifie d th e infonnatio n provide d i n their 1993 EP

A survey response : th e castin g resi n use d contains 2 8 percen tby weigh tstyren

e a s received , prio

r t o th e additio n o f

othe r ingredient

s suc h as filler an

d colorants . Additiona

l non-HA P monomer , a

t4 percentby weight , i s als o include d i n th e purchase d resin . The resi n i s a terephthali c polyeste r supplie d b y Ashlan d Chemical , an

d i s designated as KfR

l 1076 . A terephthali

c resi n wa s selecte d t o solv e th e proble m o f drai n cracking resulting from hot/col d wate r cycling . The facilit

y operate s on e shif tpe r day , mixe s resi

n i n open mixers , and use s aceton e an d Supe r Flush ® fo

r cleanup .

REPOR T I S ACCURAT

E 

## >^fcfrfrg ^ ^V C
EXHIBIT 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  amended  Quarterly  Report  of Fun For You, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March  31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer
of  the  Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.



			      /s/ Anthony DeMint
                              Anthony N. DeMint
                              President and Chief Accounting Officer
                              August 28, 2003
#### Rice v. Schlapp.

Liquor Huisance: injunction: answer not responsive as to time. ( *Tibbetts v. Burster,*76 Iowa, *176, followed.)*

*Appeal from Lee District Court.*— Hon. J. M. Casey, Judge.

Filed, February 5, 1889.

Action to restrain and abate a nuisance maintained by keeping a place for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. A demurrer to the answer was overruled, and plaintiff refusing to further plead, but standing on his pleadings, his petition was dismissed. He now appeals.

*Newman & Blake,*for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Beck, J.

The identical questions ruled in *Tibbetts v. Burster*by this court arise upon similar facts in this case. • Following that decision, 76 Iowa, 176, we direct that the judgment in this case be

Reversed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6239

STEPHEN D. PAYNE, a/k/a John Adams,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Corrections; K. V. MCWATERS, Head Nurse, Indian

Creek Correctional Center; J. GARMAN, Assistant Warden, Indian Creek Correctional Center;

DOCTOR IBBARA, Head Doctor, Indian Creek Correctional Center; J. GLOWACKI, L.P.N., Indian

Creek Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-96-862-2)

Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 17, 1997

Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stephen D. Payne, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Stephen Payne appeals from a district court order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint based on Payne's failure to

comply with a prior order of the court directing him to submit

copies of his complaint and proof that he had exhausted administrative remedies. Because Payne may proceed with this action by

amending his complaint to provide this information, his appeal is

interlocutory and not subject to appellate review under Domino

Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th

Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.1




                           CONSENT TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Greentree Software, Inc.

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration 
statement (No. 333-05245) on Form SB-3 of Greentree Software, Inc. of our 
report dated September 11, 1996, relating to the balance sheet of Greentree 
Software, Inc. as of May 31, 1996 and the related statements of operations, 
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report 
appears in the May 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Greentree 
Software, Inc.

    Our report dated September 11, 1996 contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that "the accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming
that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Notes 1 and
5 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred substantial losses from
operations, has a working capital deficit, an accumulated deficit, and a
liquidity deficiency, and is currently party to two lawsuits, one of which
involves its rights to continue to sell its primary product.  These matters
raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going
concern.  Management's plans and assessments in regard to these matters are also
described in Note 1 to the financial statements.  The financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty."

                                       /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

St. Petersburg, Florida
September 12, 1997
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


Casey's General Stores, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 33-19179, 333-35393, 33-42907, 333‐174560, 333-174561) on Form S-8 and Form S-3D of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. of our report dated June 26, 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Casey’s General Stores, Inc. and subsidiaries  as of April 30, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2015, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2015, which report appears in the April 30, 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Casey’s General Stores, Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Des Moines, Iowa


June 26, 2015
Exhibit
32











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Presidential Associates I Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-K
for the annual period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.







Date: April 14,
      2009
            /s/ Eggert Dagbjartsson
              Eggert
      Dagbjartsson
              Chief
      Executive Officer andPresidentDate: April 14,
      2009
            /s/ Andrew Prague
              Andrew
      Prague
              Chief
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         887,374
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,395
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,067,962
<PP&E>                                       6,443,639
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,120,353)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,587,612
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,890,708
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           88,500
<PREFERRED>                                  1,251,361
<COMMON>                                        64,494
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,225,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,587,612
<SALES>                                      7,476,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,476,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,976,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,051,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             639,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,027,455)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                221,814
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,011,078)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.18)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Fifth Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for Class III Gaming between the Kalispel Indian Community of the Kalispel Reservation and the State of Washington.

# DATES:

The Amendment takes effect on February 14, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240,                         *IndianGaming@bia.gov;*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment authorizes the Tribe to offer Electronic Table Games, as well as extend credit, at the Tribe's class III gaming facilities. Additionally, the Amendment establishes new upper limitations on certain wagers, gaming stations numbers, and player terminals, as well as increasing contributions to problem gaming resources and charitable donations while reducing payments to local mitigation funds. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2024-03012 Filed 2-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 3, 2019

No. 04-19-00719-CR

Deuk Bok CHA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 575753

The Honorable Helen P. Stowe, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

appellant’s brief is due on February 17, 2020.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gerald Lau and Sean Webster, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopack
      Environmental Solutions Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the
      Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc.                                                                

Dated: August 12, 2010

| | /s/ Gerald Lau                                                  
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| | Gerald Lau                                                      
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director                 
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                                   
| |                                                                 
| |                                                                 
| | /s/ Sean Webster                                                
| | Sean Webster                                                    
| | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer
      and Director
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting     
| | Officer)                                                        

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6133

MICHAEL WAYNE LUCK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-01-541-2) Submitted: March 12, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Wayne Luck, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Wayne Luck appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Luck v. Angelone , No. CA-01-541-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 8, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED