# Exemption Modeling Analysis in Support of the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Regulations - 40 CFR 51.300 and Appendix Y

Prepared for:

International Paper Augusta Mill 4278 Mike Padgett Highway Augusta, GA 30906

Prepared by:

URS Corporation – North Carolina 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400 Morrisville, North Carolina 27560

July 28, 2006

# Exemption Modeling Analysis in Support of the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Regulations - 40 CFR 51.300 and Appendix Y

International Paper

Augusta, Georgia

Prepared for: International Paper – Augusta Mill 4278 Mike Padgett Highway Augusta, Georgia 30906

Prepared by: URS Corporation – North Carolina 1600 Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 400

Morrisville, North Carolina 27560

July 28, 2006ii 

### Table of Contents Page

1.0 Introduction and Background ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objective of BART Exemption Modeling.............................................................. 3 1.2 Response to Protocol Comments ............................................................................ 4 1.3 Facility Location and Relevant Class I Areas......................................................... 5 1.4 Source Impact Evaluation Criteria.......................................................................... 7 1.5 General Overview of the CALPUFF Modeling System......................................... 7

2.0 BART Source Descriptions .............................................................................................. 7 2.1 Unit Specific Source Data....................................................................................... 7 2.2 Tabulated Source Data.......................................................................................... 10

3.0 Geophysical and Meteorological Data .......................................................................... 12

4.0 CALPUFF Modeling Methodology ............................................................................... 12 4.1 Methodology......................................................................................................... 12 4.2 CALMET Model Configura tion and Application................................................. 12 4.3 CALPUFF Model Configura tion and Application ............................................... 13 4.3.1 Domain Definition................................................................................... 13 4.3.2 Model Set-Up .......................................................................................... 15 4.3.3 Emissions Input Development................................................................. 15 4.3.4 Additional CALPUFF Input Information and Settings ........................... 15

5.0 POSTUTIL PROCESSING ........................................................................................... 16

6.0 CALPOST PROCESSING............................................................................................. 16 6.1 Visibility Assessment............................................................................................ 17

7.0 REPORTING .................................................................................................................. 19 7.1 CALPUFF Modeling Results................................................................................ 19

8.0 REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 23



### Appendices

Appendix A Emission Rates and Supporting Information Appendix B CALFUFF Configuration Appendix C CALPOST Configuration Appendix D Class I Receptors in Lambert Conformal Coordinatesiii 

### List of Tables Page Table 2-1 BART Eligible Emission Units - Point Source Parameters.................................. 10 Table 2-2 BART Eligible Emission Units - Volume Source Parameters.............................. 11 Table 6-1 Default Natural Background Concentrations (μg/m 3 ) for Eastern U.S. Class I Areas (Source: EPA, 2003, Table 2-1) .................................................. 19 Table 7-1 BART Exemption Modeling Results for Eight Class I Areas .............................. 20 Table 7-2 Summary of BART Exemption Modeling Results - Three-Year Approach......... 22



### List of Figures

Figure 1-1 Facility Location Relative to Class I Areas ............................................................ 6 Figure 4-1 VISTAS CALMET DOMAIN with CALPUFF Sub-domain ............................ 14

## Executive Summary

The International Paper (IP) Augusta Mill has performed a long-range transport modeling analysis using the CALPUFF mode ling system to demonstrate that air emissions from BARTeligible units at the IP Augusta Mill do not cause or contribut e to visibility impairment in any Federal Class I area within 300 kilometers of the mill. The modeling analysis was performed according to the conservative guidance provided by the Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Sout heast (VISTAS) in the Protocol for the Applic ation of the CALPUFF Model for Analyses of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART), December 22, 2005, Revision 3, 7/18/06.

This report documents the BART exemption mode ling procedures and results and demonstrates that the IP Augusta Mill should be exempted from any further requirements under the BART rule. A summary of the results is presented below.

Class I Area Distance (km) From

Mill to Class I Area

Boundary No. of days with impact >0.5 dv in

Class I Area: 2001 No. of days with impact >0.5 dv in

Class I Area: 2002 No. of days with impact >0.5 dv in

Class I Area: 2003 No. of days with impact >1.0 dv in Class I Area

for 3-yr Period Max 24-hr impact for Highest 8 th High Value for Any Year Max. 24-hr impact over 3-yr period, 22 nd Highest Value Cohutta 294 0 0 0 0 0.114 0.110 Cape Romain 219 0 0 0 0 0.211 0.198 Great Smoky Mt 268 0 0 0 0 0.093 0.085 Joyce Kilmer 289 0 0 0 0 0.086 0.075 Linville Gorge 275 0 0 0 0 0.103 0.100 Okefenokee 254 0 0 0 0 0.157 0.129 Shining Rock 236 0 0 0 0 0.127 0.118 Wolf Island 226 0 0 0 0 0.148 0.1281 

## 1.0 Introduction and Background

International Paper (IP) has retained URS Corpora tion (URS) to assist in the development of a long-range transport modeling analysis using the CALPUFF modeling system to demonstrate that air emissions from BART eligible units at the IP Augusta Mill do not cause or contribute to visibility impairment in any Federal Class I area within 300 kilometers of the mill. These regulatory modeling requirements are briefly defined in 40 CFR 51, Appendix Y. The modeling was conducted using the detailed procedures ou tlined in a common prot ocol developed by the Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Associ ation of the Southeast (VISTAS) and a “sitespecific” protocol developed by URS and submi tted to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Environmental Protection Di vision (Georgia DNR) on April 28, 2006.

Comments and recommendations fr om Georgia DNR on the “site-sp ecific” protocol have been incorporated into this modeling analysis. The following provides a regulatory background of the BART regulation and summarizes the modeling procedures used to conduct the BART exemption modeling.

The Clean Air Act established goals for visibility in many national parks and wilderness areas. Through the 1977 amendments to the Clean Air Act, Congress set a national goal for visibility as “the prevention of any future, and the remedying of any existing, impairment of visibility in mandatory Class I Federal areas which impairment results from manmade air pollution.” The Amendments required EPA to issue regulations to assure “reasonable progress” toward meeting the national goal.

In 1980, EPA promulgated regulations to address th e visibility impairment that is “reasonably attributable” to a single source or small gr oup of sources. In 1988, the States, Federal Land Managers (e.g., National Park Service, U.S. Fore st Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management), and EPA began mon itoring of fine particle concentrations and visibility in 30 national parks and wi lderness areas across the country.

The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 required EPA to take regulatory action on regional haze and they proposed the Regional Haze Regulations in July 1997 in conjunction with issuing new national ambient air quality standards for fine particulate matter.

On July 1, 1999, EPA promulgated the final Regi onal Haze Regulation. The final Regional Haze Regulation calls for state and fe deral agencies to work togeth er to improve visibility in 156 national parks and wilderness areas in the Un ited States by developing and implementing long-term air quality protection plans to reduce th e pollution that causes visibility impairment in these protected areas.

The Regional Haze regulation provides States fl exibility in determin ing reasonable progress goals for protected areas by conducting certain an alyses to ensure that they consider the possibility of setting an ambitious reasonable prog ress goal, one that is aimed at reaching natural background conditions by the year 2064. The regulat ion requires States to establish goals for each affected area to (1) improve visibility on the haziest days, and (2) ensure no degradation occurs on the clearest days over the period of each implementation plan.2 The Regional Haze regulation also requires States to develop long-term strategies including enforceable measures designed to meet reasonabl e progress goals. The first long-term strategy will cover 10 to 15 years, with reassessment a nd revision of those goals and strategies in 2018 and every 10 years thereafter. State’s strategi es will address their cont ribution to visibility problems in Class I areas both w ithin and outside the State.

One of the principal elements of the visibili ty protection provisions of the Clean Air Act addresses installation of best av ailable retrofit technology (BART) for certain existing sources. “BART-eligible” sources are th ose sources built between 1962 a nd 1977 that have the potential to emit more than 250 tons per year of one or more visibility-impairing compounds including sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen oxides (NO x ), particulate matter (P M), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and that fall within 26 indus trial source categories (i ncluding Kraft pulp and paper manufacturing).

Soon after the Regional Haze Regulation was fina lized, several parties filed petitions to challenge the rule with the U.S. Court of App eals for the D.C. Circuit. In April 2004, EPA Administrator Mike Leavitt signed a propos ed amendment to the 1999 Regional Haze Regulation. The proposed rule satisfied the te rms of a May 2002 ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which vacated pa rts of the BART provisions of the 1999 Regional Haze Regulation ( American Corn Growers et. al. v. EPA , 291 F. 3d 1 (D.C. cir. 2002)).

The rule requires states to consider the visibi lity impacts of an indi vidual facility when determining whether they have to install controls. The final BART implementation and guidance rule (40 CFR Part 51, Appendix Y) was publishe d on July 6, 2005 and it allows for a BART evaluation for any BART-eligible source that “em its any air pollutant which may reasonably be anticipated to cause or contribute to any impair ment of visibility” in any mandatory Class I federal area.

Pursuant to the rule, States have the option of exempting a BART-eligible source from the BART requirements based on dispersion mode ling demonstrating that the source cannot reasonably be anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment in a Class I area. Regional Planning Organizations (RPOs), such as the VISTAS have prepared guidance for performing the dispersion modeling analyses. According to 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix Y, a BART-eligible source is considered to “contribute” to visibility impairment in a Class I area if the modeled 98 th percentile change in dv is equal to or greater than the “contribution threshold.” Any BART-eligible source determin ed to cause or contribute to visibility impairment in any Class I area is subject to a BART evaluation.

The Protocol for the Application of the CALPUFF M odel for Analyses of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART), Decembe r 22, 2005, Revision 3, 7/18/06

, was prepared by the VISTAS RPO to provide some common guidance for pe rforming conservative BART exemption and determination modeling evaluations as allowed by the regulation.

The final BART rule defines a “contribution thre shold” of 0.5 dv as the value where a modeled BART eligible source may “contribute” to visibi lity impairment and the threshold to determine whether a single source “causes” visibility impairment is set at a 1.0-dv change from natural conditions (background visual range) over a 24-hour averaging period in the final BART rule (703 FR 39118). An approximate 1.0 deciview change was defined by Pitchford and Malm (1992) as a “just noticeable change” to the observer when the background visual ra nge equals the line-ofsight (LOS) of the observer. A ccording to L. Willard Richards in “Use of the Deciview Haze Index as an Indicator for Regional Haze” if a sh orter LOS distance than the background visual range (natural conditions) is used in performing the calculations th en a higher extinction value, or deciview, is needed to cause a “just noticeable change.” In other words, when the LOS is less than the background visual range, then it would require a higher de ciview value in order to be a “just noticeable change.” Since large concentra tion gradients are expect ed when modeling single sources, it is generally underst ood that “single-source” visibility impairment modeling include some estimate of the change in concentration wi th distance. However, this is not done using current VISTAS modeling guidance.

The exemption modeling results presented in th is report only use the conservative modeling approach as defined by the VISTAS protocol by determining the ch ange in extinction at single maximum receptors in a Class I ar ea and did not use the a refined modeling line-of-sight or sight path approach that is consistent with the definition of the deciview metric. This was done since the more conservative VISTAS modeling results produced values below levels of concern at each Class I area and the extra time and effort to do LOS modeling would provide little added value to the BART exemption analysis.



### 1.1 Objective of BART Exemption Modeling The objective of this BART exemption modeling analysis is to demonstrate that all BART eligible emission units located at the IP Augusta Mill do not cause or contribute to visibility impairment in any of the Class I areas located within 300 kilometers of the plant site. The VISTAS organization has developed a set of mode ling procedures that were used to conduct the exemption modeling. These modeling procedures are discussed in the VISTAS document titled; Protocol for the Application of the CALPUFF Model for Analyses of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART), December 22, 2005- Revision 3 – 7/18/06 . The VISTAS modeling procedures and additional refinements are also di scussed in a “site-specif ic” protocol developed by URS titled; Protocol for the Application of the CALPUFF Model in Support of the Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Regula tions – 40 CFR 51.300 and Appendix Y, April 28, 2006 . The VISTAS States, including Georgia, have accepted EPA’s guidance to use the CALPUFF modeling system to comply with th e BART modeling require ments of the regional haze rule.

International Paper has conducted refined CA LPUFF modeling to quantify the estimated visibility impairment of the mill’s BART-eligible emission units as compared to natural visibility conditions. The refined modeling pr ocedures are discussed in this summary report. International Paper requests that the GA DNR review this re port and provide IP with a notification letter stating that the BART exemption request has b een approved based on the technical accuracy of the modeling approaches used therein. Interna tional Paper and URS Cor poration are willing to discuss these model results in greater detail at any time with the Ge orgia DNR and supply any additional material needed in or der to facilitate the review.4 

### 1.2 Response to Protocol Comments The Georgia DNR provided comments to IP Augusta regarding the site-specific BART exemption modeling protocol on June 23, 2006. The following items respond to the June 1, 2006 General Comments for all Georgia BART exemption Modeling Protocols from the US EPA.

Item 1. Rayleigh Scattering and Sea Salt: An adjusted Rayleigh Sca ttering and the use of a sea salt adjustment factor is a reasonable assumption that is based on good science. However, to expedite the review process, URS did not include any adjustments for Rayl eigh Scattering and sea salts in this analysis.

Item 2. GEP Stack Height: No IP Augusta BART eligible unit has a height greater than 65 meters; therefore, this issue does not impact the IP Augusta Mill.

Item 3. a: Input modeling tables are being pr ovided in this report which include all the recommended EPA model settings. b: We have incl uded the basis for the determination of all BART eligible units. c: Comment not applicable to IP Augusta.

Specific EPA Comments on the IP A ugusta Mill are addressed below.

1. Use of 98 th percentile for visibility threshold comparison . URS did not conduct any screening level CALPUFF modeling. Only re fined 4-km modeling was perform ed, which allows the use of 98 th percentile values. Final m odeling results are based on the 98 th percentile value for three individual years and three years combined.

2. AERMOD Turbulence-based dispersion . Standard Pasquill-Gifford (P-G) curves were used for this BART exemption modeling.

3. Ammonia-Limiting Method : As recommended by the Georgi a DNR in the June 23, 2006 protocol comment letter under item 2, a value of 0.5 ppb for backgr ound ammonia was used for all modeling.

4. Alternative methodologies when VISTAS BART Protocol method fails

. a. Sea Salt and Rayleigh Sc attering Adjustments . URS did not make adjustments to the standard IMPROVE equation in this modeling submittal.

b. Line-of-sight (LOS) . The LOS approach was not us ed in this modeling analysis.

c. URS believes that applying Method 7 or 7 prime would remove yet another conservative component from the BART modelin g process. However, URS di d not conduct any Method 7 or 7 prime modeling for this analysis.

d. URS conducted all BART mo deling for this analysis using the recommended VISTAS model procedures. These standard procedures are discussed in the reminder of this report.5 The following items address the comments in the May 18, 2006 letter from the United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (FS) to Georgia Depa rtment of Natural Resources, Environmental Prot ection Division.

With respect to the FS comment on 12 kilometer screening proce dures please refer to the URS response to the US EPA under specific item 1.

With respect to the FS comment on the use of ammonia data please refer to the URS response to the US EPA under specific item 3.

LOS modeling technique: LOS was not used in this modeling analysis.

Method 7: URS did not use Method 7 modeling assumptions in this analysis.

Relative Humidity, f(RH) and EPRI Coefficients: URS did not use an y of these adjustments in this analysis.

This BART exemption modeling analysis was conducted using standard (VISTAS) recommended modeling procedures. These pro cedures are discussed in the remainder of this report.



### 1.3 Facility Location and Relevant Class I Areas The International Paper Augusta, Georgia pulp and paper mill is located at 4278 Mike Padgett Highway near Augusta, Georgia. The Universal Transverse Mercator (U TM) coordinates, in kilometers (km), for the mill are Zone 17, 411.300 East and 3688.200 North. The approximate Lambert Conformal Conic (LCC) coordinate s are 1390.566 km East and -623.286 km North. There are eight (8) Class I areas within 300 k ilometers of the Augusta Mill: Cape Romain, Okefenokee and Wolf Island National Wildlife Re fuge Areas, Shining Rock, Linville Gorge, Joyce Kilmer/Slickrock and Cohutta Wilderness Areas and the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Figure 1-1 displays the lo cation of the mill and the eight Cl ass I areas. Cape Romain is located approximately 219 kilometers east of the mill, Wolf Island is located approximately 226 kilometers southeast of the mill, Okefenokee is located 254 kilometers south of the mill, Shining Rock is located 236 km northwest of the mill, Gr eat Smoky Mountains is located 268 kilometers northwest of the mill, Linville Gorge is located 275 kilometers north of the mill, Joyce Kilmer/Slickrock is located 289 kilometers northwest of the mill and Cohutta is located 294 kilometers northwest of the mill.6 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 LCC East (km) -1600 -1400 -1200 -1000

-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400LCC North (km)

Mill

FILE NO.

31825278 URS Corporation – North Carolina 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 400 Morrisville, North Carolina 27560 Telephone (919) 461-1100 Fax (919) 461-1415

SCALE: DRAWN BY: SCL DATE: SCL

AS SHOWN CHECKED BY: DATE: International Paper, Augusta 1-2 Facility Location Relative to Class I Areas FIG. NO. 1-17 

### 1.4 Source Impact Evaluation Criteria To assess whether a BART eligible source is exempt from performing a BART control technology evaluation, a two-tiered modeling approach is sugge sted by VISTAS: a screening level analysis which uses 12-km grid data from CALMET with no supporting observational data included or a more refined CALMET data with a grid spacing of 4-km with observational data to better define a facilities impact . In order to perform the exemption modeling in the most efficient manner, URS has skipped the screening level modeling analysis using the 12-km grid data and has only used the 4-km refined meteor ological data. Using the 4-km data provides a more accurate prediction of the mill’s impact on vi sibility as compared to natural conditions.

As suggested in VISTAS BART modeling gu idance, the CALPUFF/CALPOST models were used to estimate a maximum 98 th percentile value for visibili ty impairment during a 24-hour averaging period. The higher of the 8 th highest individual year or the 22 nd highest for the three-year modeling period are reported. This value was compared to the EPA/VISTAS recommended visibility threshold of 0.5 dv.



### 1.5 General Overview of the CALPUFF Modeling System The CALPUFF modeling system consists of th ree main processors: CALMET, CALPUFF and CALPOST. CALMET is the meteorological mode l that generates hourly three-dimensional meteorological fields of variables such as wind and temperature. CALPUFF simulates the transport, dispersion, and transformation of compounds emitted from a source and calculates hourly concentration values for vi sibility impairing compounds at each receptor located in the modeling domain. CALPOST calculates time-av eraged concentration values from the CALPUFF predictions and perfor ms regional haze calculations like those described in the Section 6.1 of this report. 

## 2.0 BART Source Descriptions

The IP Augusta Mill is located near Augusta, Georgia, along the Savannah River. The primary activities at Augusta Mill are pulp production (Standard Industri al Classification [SIC] code 2611) and paperboard production (SIC code 2631). The Mill began operations in 1960. Primary operations at the mill include multiple fuel-fir ed boilers, chemical recovery operations, wood pulping and bleaching operations, papermaking, and additional operations and equipment necessary to support these opera tions. The facility currently employs about 750 people, and produces a nominal 750,000 tons per year of coated bleached board used for greeting cards, pharmaceutical and foodservice packaging, and cigarette packaging. 

### 2.1 Unit Specific Source Data

The emission estimates used in the CALPUFF model are intended to reflect steady-state operating conditions during periods of high capacity utiliz ation. Consistent with the VISTAS common protocol, modeled emissions do not include period s of start-up, shutdown, and malfunction. The modeling is based on the 24-hour average actual emission rate from the highest emitting day during the most recent 3-year period. The following hierarchy for developing the emission estimates was used for the IP Augusta mill:8 • Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) data;

• Facility emissions tests;

• Emission factors;

• Permit limits; or

• Potential to emit.

The Augusta Mill developed emission estimates based on source testing and accepted emission factors used for routine annual emissions repor ting. In general, the following emission rates were used:

• Short-term (24-hours) allowable emissi on rates (e.g., emission rates calculated using the maximum rated capacity of the source);

• Federally enforceable short-term limits (24-hours); or

• Peak 24-hour actual emission rates (or calcu lated emission rates) from the most recent 3-years of operation that account for “high capacity utilization” during normal operating conditions and fuel/m aterial flexibility allowed under the existing air permit. In situations where a unit is allowed to use more than one fuel, the fuel resulting in the highest em ission rates was used for the modeling, as long as that fuel represented a realisti c 24-hour operating scenario. Scenarios representing periods of startup, shut down, or malfunction were not modeled.

Short-term emission rates (24-hours) for SO 2 , NO x , H 2 SO 4 mist, and PM 10 (including condensable and filterable direct PM 10 ) were modeled since visibility changes are calculated for a 24-hour averaging period. All BART-eligible emission units at the mill that emit these compounds were modeled together in the CALPUFF model.

Listed below is a brief description of all the BART-eligible emission units at the mill:

• No. 2 Power Boiler (PB2A): This boiler fires pulverized coal, No. 6 fuel oil, natural gas, and used oil. The No. 2 Power Boiler also serves as a backup control device for the non-condensable gas (NCG) system. The No. 2 Power Boiler nominal throughput is 532 MMBtu/hr when firing pulverized coal, 600 MMBtu/hr when firing No. 6 fuel oil, and 677 MMBtu/hr when firing natural gas. The unit is controlled by an electr ostatic precipitator.

• No. 2 Recovery Boiler (RB2A): This dire ct contact evaporator (DCE) recovery boiler fires black liquor solids, with No. 6 fuel oil or natural gas as auxiliary fuels. The No. 2 Recovery Boiler nominal th roughput is 2.0 million pounds of black liquor solids per day, 460 MMBtu/hr when firing No. 6 fuel oil during periods of SSM or low BLS throughput, and 100 MMBtu/hr of natura l gas. The unit is controlled by an electrostatic precipitator.

• No. 2 Smelt Dissolving Tank (ST2A): This sm elt dissolving tank receives smelt from the No. 2 Recovery Boiler. This unit is controlled by a wet scrubber.

• No. 2 Paper Machine (PM2A): This paper m achine is equipped with 28 infrared (IR) heaters (1.1 MMBtu/hr each) and 2 aircap heaters (rated at 3.4 and 8.0 MMBtu/hr) that are natural gas fired.9 • No. 1 Slaker/Causticizer (CAU1): The No. 1 Slaker/Causticizer has a maximum throughput of 13 tons CaO per hour. The slak er vent duct is e quipped with a liquid spray nozzle, but this is not considered a formal air polluti on control device.

The following BART-eligible units do not emit SO 2 , NO x , H 2 SO 4 mist, or PM 10 and were not modeled.

• No. 2 A/B Filtrate Tank (2ABF)

• No. 2 Brownstock Washer and Screens (BSW2)

• No. 2 Evaporators (EV2A)

• No. 2 Green Liquor Clarifier (GLC2)

• No. 1 Black Liquor Pond (BLP1) – Closed in 2006

The Riley Auxiliary Boiler (RLYA) was recen tly excluded from the list of BART-eligible emission units because it is a backup boiler with heat input less than 250 MMBtu. It is not integral to the process. The Riley Auxiliary Bo iler fires No. 2 fuel oil or natural gas and is permitted to operate only when one of the primary boilers or recovery boilers is offline. The Riley Boiler’s nominal throughput is 220 MMBtu/hr.

Appendix A provides information on how the list of BART-eligible units was developed and presents the emission rate calculations for the BART-eligible units that emit SO 2 , NO x , H 2 SO 4 mist, or PM 10 . Tables 2-1 and 2-2 provide detailed stack parameter information for the modeled BART-eligible emission units at the mill.102.2 Tabulated Source DataTABLE 2-1BART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITS - POINT SOURCE PARAMETERSINTERNATIONAL PAPER,AUGUSTA, GEORGIAURS PROJECT NO. 31825278UTM UTM LCC LCC Base StackExit StackModel Source Easting Northing Easting Northing Elevation HeightTemperature Velocity DiameterID Description (m) (m) (km) (km) (m) (m) (°K) (m/s) (m)PB2ANo. 2 Power Boiler 411316.00 3688176.25 1390.566 -623.286 48.0 60.96 518.7 20.6 2.74RB2ANo. 2 Recovery Boiler 411375.41 3688129.25 1390.566 -623.286 48.0 60.96 430.93 21.8 2.44ST2A No. 2 Smelt Dissolving Tank411313.84 3688110.25 1390.566 -623.286 48.0 39.40 336.7 17.8 1.05CAU1 No. 1 Slaker/Causticizer411373.9 3688026.5 1390.566 -623.286 48.0 11.58 293.0 0.01 1.011TABLE 2-2BART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITS -VOLUME SOURCE PARAMETERSINTERNATIONAL PAPER,AUGUSTA, GEORGIAURS PROJECT NO. 31825278UTM UTM LCC LCC Base Release Horizontal VerticalModel Source Easting Northing Easting Northing Elevation Height Dimension DimensionID Description (m) (m) (km) (km) (m) (m) (m) (m)PM2A No. 2 Paper Machine 411142.09 3688250.00 1390.566 -623.286 48.0 19.5 14.84 9.0812 

## 3.0 Geophysical and Meteorological Data

URS used the geophysical and meteorological da ta developed by VISTAS for the 4-km BART exemption modeling. The development of this information was discussed in detail in the VISTAS common protocol. 

## 4.0 CALPUFF Modeling Methodology

CALPUFF modeling was conducted us ing the 4-km data in orde r to efficiently and more accurately demonstrate that the IP Augusta Mill does not cause or contribute to visibility impairment in any Class I area and thus is ex empt from the BART rule. The modeling methods described in this section were us ed to identify specific Class I ar eas that might be most affected by emissions from the BART eligible emission units located at the IP Augusta Mill. It needs to be noted that the CALPUFF modeling used all r ecommended data that wa s publicly available on April 1, 2006. Background concentrations for SO 4 and TNO 3 from CMAQ (2001-2003) annual runs were not publicly available on that date; th erefore, URS could not in clude this information in the CALPUFF runs and still m eet Georgia DNR submittal deadlines.

CALPUFF modeling was performed us ing the standard set of defau lt meteorological, air quality and dispersion conditions that have been deve loped by VISTAS for the 4-km gridded CALMET domain number five. It is our unde rstanding that these data were de veloped to be consistent with recommendations developed by the Interagenc y Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling (IWAQM, 1998) and FLAG (2000).


### 4.1 Methodology This analysis was performed using the CALPUFF model with three years of meteorological data developed by VISTAS along with the standard compliment of model algorithms invoked. URS evaluated the 98 th percentile impacts since 4-km data is being used for the analysis and this percentile is recommended under 40 CFR 51, Appendix Y.

The regional haze impacts at each applicable Class I area were calculated from the daily visibility values for each receptor by determini ng the change in deciviews compared against natural visibility conditions. EPA’s “Guidan ce for Estimating Natural Visibility Conditions Under the Regional Haze Rule,” EPA-454/B03-005 (September 2003) lists recommended natural visibility conditions. To determ ine whether IP Augusta may reas onably be anticipated to cause or contribute to visibility impairment at a n earby Class I area, the impacts predicted by CALPUFF were compared against the pertinent na tural visibility backgr ound and the threshold that has been selected. 

### 4.2 CALMET Model Configuration and Application

Sections 4.3.2 and 4.4.2 within the VISTAS comm on protocol discuss in detail the model configurations used to generate the common CALMET meteorological files for modeling BART eligible sources. The confi guration is reported to follo w the IWAQM recommendations (EPA, 1998, Appendix A), except as noted in the protocol. For CALPUFF modeling there is no need to compile CALMET inputs, run the CALMET model or evaluate the outputs.13 The model-ready meteorological data sets ha ve been developed by VISTAS for one large regional domain and five smaller sub-regional do mains. The IP Augusta Mill is located in subregional domain number 4 depicted in the VIST AS common protocol. Figure 4-1 displays the configuration of the regional domain and the size and location of the smaller CALPUFF modeling domain used in the analysis. 

### 4.3 CALPUFF Model Configuration and Application URS used the newly released VISTAS version of the CALPUFF modeling system version 5.754. This version contains enhancements funded by the Minerals Management Service (MMS) and VISTAS. This version includes CALMET, CA LPUFF, CALPOST, CALSUM, POSTUTIL, and CALVIEW, and it was obtained from the CALPUFF website.

All CALPUFF modeling used the standard P-G cu rves. The sequence of model processors for all modeling was CALPUFF then CALPOST. POSTUTIL was not used to conduct ALM modeling since very little benefits (lower predicted concentr ations) were seen from using the ALM procedures for this facility. POSTUTIL also was not used for partic le size modeling since all particulate matter (PM) wa s assumed to be in the 0.48 micron category and this greatly speeded up the modeling process by being able to go directly from CALPUFF to CALPOST by simply defining the PM components in terms of coarse, soil, elemental carbon and secondary organic aerosol. Not using POSTUTIL for ALM or PM particle size modeling is a conservative process (may produce slightly higher impacts). In itial tests using POSTUTIL showed this to be the case. The total contribution to visibility impairment from PM emissions is relatively minor when compared to the contributions from nitrates and sulfates. This can be seen by examining the CALPOST output files. CALMET and associ ated preprocessors are not discussed since VISTAS performed these model runs.

4.3.1 Domain Definition The meteorological modeling data sets cover three contiguous years (2001, 2002, and 2003) and have been resolved to a 4-km horizontal reso lution grid using MM5 da ta. Details of the modeling domains and the meteorological databases for 2001, 2002, and 2003 are discussed in detail in the VIST AS common protocol.

Receptor Network and Class I Receptors. Discrete receptor coordinate data for the eight Federal Class I areas within 300 km of the source were developed using the Natio nal Park Service (NPS) Convert Class I Areas (NCC) comp uter program. The receptor elevations provided by the NPS were used for modeling. All receptors for each Class I area were included in single CALPUFF simulations. There are 110 receptors listed for Shining Rock, 745 receptors for the Great Smoky Mountains, 66 receptors for Linville Gorge, 101 receptors for Joyce Kilmer/Slickrock 220 receptors for the Cohutta Class I area, 164 recep tors for Cape Romain, 30 receptors for Wolf Island and 490 receptors for the Okefenokee Class I area. Appendix D cont ains a listing of the Lambert Conformal coordinates for each Class I ar ea with the associated receptor heights.14 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 LCC East (km) -1600 -1400 -1200 -1000

-800 -600 -400 -200 0 200 400LCC North (km)

Mill

FILE NO.

31825278 URS Corporation – North Carolina 1600 Perimeter Park Drive Suite 400 Morrisville, North Carolina 27560 Telephone (919) 461-1100 Fax (919) 461-1415 FIG. NO. SCALE: DRAWN BY: SCL DATE: SCL

AS SHOWN CHECKED BY: DATE: International Paper - Augusta VISTAS CALMET DOMAIN with CALPUFF

Sub-domain 4-115 4.3.2 Model Set-Up The modeling used a CALPUFF computational domain that includes all applicable Class I areas within 300 km of the source and a 50-kilometer buffer around applicable Class I areas and the mill. The size and location of the 4-km CALPUFF computational domains is shown in Figure 4-1.

As depicted in Figure 4-1, the CA LPUFF modeling domain is a subs et of the larger regional and sub-regional CALMET meteorological domains. A smaller CALPUFF domain is being used to reduce the CALPUFF run times. The CALPUFF 4- km sub domain is approximately 612 km in the east/west direction a nd 684 km in the north/sout h direction. Using a 4-km grid spacing from the CALMET files, this would relate to 153 x 171 grid squares. Appendix B contains a summary of the input options selected when performing CALPUFF modeling.

4.3.3 Emissions Input Development Emissions from the facility include SO 2 , NO x , H 2 SO 4 mist, and PM 10 (including condensable and filterable in the form of coar se, soil, elemental carbon, and se condary organic aerosol PM).

Emissions Speciation . URS used the example spreadsh eets supplied by VISTAS and the CMAQ speciation profiles availa ble on EPA’s website for PM sp eciation. Appendix A provides detailed information on PM speciation for the BART-eligible units.

Condensable Emissions . Condensable emissions were considered primary fine particulate matter. Appendix A provides detailed informa tion on condensable and filterable PM emissions from the BART-eligible units.

Size Classification of Primary PM Emissions . As a conservative modeling assumption all PM was modeled in the 0.48 micron cat egory. This is due to the f act that the non-hygroscopic PM has a relatively minor impact on visibility impairment based information from CALPOST.

4.3.4 Additional CALPUFF Input Information and Settings CALPUFF Model Options . The model options, parameter settings, and ‘switches’ for exercising CALPUFF for BA RT modeling are discussed below. Appendix B contains tables that list the default and the actual modeled configura tions used for the BART modeling. The default configurations are from the IWAQM Phase 2 Report (EPA, 1998).

Visibility Modeling Domain . The CALPUFF domain was confi gured to include the source and all Class I areas within 300 km . An additional 50-km buffer z one was established in each cardinal direction from th e source and Class I area.

Building Downwash . Building and structure information was not included.

Puff Dispersion . Based on recent guidance from EPA and VISTAS the current default P-G dispersion curves were used for CALPUFF modeling.

Puff Representation . The default integrated puff sampling methodology was used in CALPUFF.

Puff Splitting . There is no quantitative evidence that the horizontal and vertical puff-splitting algorithms in CALPUFF yield improved accuracy a nd precision in model estimates of inert or16 linearly reactive compounds althoug h conceptually the methods are appealing because they mimic lateral and vertical wind speed and dire ction shears. Therefore puff splitting was not invoked.

Chemical Mechanism . The MESOPUFF II module was used for BART modeling. For the aqueous phase conversion of SO 2 to sulfate (important when the plume interacts with clouds and fog), the IWAQM defaults we re used, i.e., nighttime SO 2 loss rate (RNITE1) is assumed to be 0.2 percent per hour. The nighttime NO x loss rate (RNITE2) and HNO 3 formation rate (RNITE3) are both set to 2.0 percent per hour.

Particulate matter emissions by size category were combined into the appropriate species for the visibility analysis. These speci es include (a) elemental carbon (EC), (b) fine PM or “soil” (<2.5 μm in diameter), (c) coarse PM (between 2.5-10 μm in diameter), and (d) organics, referred to as secondary organic aeros ols in the CALPOST postprocessor.

Background Ozone Concentrations . Ozone concentration data for 2001-2003 from ambient AIRS/CASNET monitors located within the part icular domain being modeled were used to develop background estimates. Only non-urban oz one stations were used in the OZONE.DAT file. Monthly average ozone background values was computed for the Class I area that had the highest ozone measurements in the domain whic h was Shinning Rock. The values represent the daytime average ozone concentratio ns (6 am to 6 pm average).

Background Ammonia Concentrations . A constant (0.5 ppb) va lue was used for ammonia.

Other Background Concentrations . Concentrations of SO 4 and TNO 3 (HNO 3 + NO 3 ) from CMAQ 2001-2003 were not made available in time to be included in the modeling submittal. In a borderline modeling situation this could be an important component. However, the current modeling results indicate that th is data would need to have a major impact to change the conclusions given in this report. Georgia DNR or VISTAS may wi sh to include this data for completeness after the submittal date should data became available.



## 5.0 POSTUTIL PROCESSING

No POSTUTIL processing was conducted due to th e limited benefits on modeling results. Not using the POSTUTIL program adds a slightly higher degree of conservatism to the modeling results but greatly speeds up the time needed to evaluate the modeling results. Initial testing using POSTUTIL for ALM and particle size mode ling indicated only slightly lower values in visibility impacts.



## 6.0 CALPOST PROCESSING

CALPOST Parameters . Appendix B summarizes the CALPOST post-processor options, parameters, and switches. Tables are presented containing the act ual and default configurations for the BART modeling. All Class I receptors were included in a single CALPUFF simulation, URS has calculated the visibility impacts in CA LPOST for each Class I area separately using the NDRECP parameter. It specifies the receptor ra nge to be processed in CALPOST. Given the importance of the CALPOST processor to the entir e BART visibility estimation a brief overview of how CALPOST calculates visibility impact s is presented in the following section.17 

### 6.1 Visibility Assessment The recommended procedure for quantifying visibili ty impacts is described in detail in the VISTAS common protocol. The key point is that the light extinc tion coefficient (bext) can be calculated from the IMPROVE Equation as:

b ext = 3 f(RH) [(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ] + 3 f(RH) [NH 4 NO 3 ] + 4[OC] + 1[Soil] + 0.6[Coarse Mass] + 10[EC] + b ray The monthly site-specific f(RH) values were obtained for each mandatory Federal Class I Area from Table A-3 in the EPA (2003) guidance documen t. Then, the haze index (HI), in deciviews, was calculated in terms of th e extinction coefficient via:

HI = 10 ln (b ext /10)

The change in visibility (measured in terms of ‘delta-deciviews’) were compared against background conditions. The delta-deciview, .dv, value was calculated from the IP Augusta Mill’s contribution to extinction, b source , and background extinction, b background , as follows:

dv = 10 ln ({b background + b source }/ b background )

If the dv value is greater than the 0.5 dv threshol d, then IP Augusta could contribute to visibility impairment and may be subject to BART controls . If not, IP Augusta will be BART-exempt.

Visibility Impacts from BART-Eligible Sources

Visibility Impact Method . CALPOST was run using Met hod 6 (MVISBK=6) for calculating extinction. That is, monthly f(RH) adjustment factors were applied directly to the background and modeled sulfate and nitrate concentrations, as recommended in the BART guidelines. Note that the RHMAX parameter (the ma ximum relative humidity factor used in the particle growth equation) is not used when Method 6 is selecte d. Similarly, the relative humidity adjustment factor (f(RH)) curves in CALPOST (e.g., IWAQM/FLAG/EPA growth curves) are not used when MVISBK is equal to 6. f(RH) is taken directly from EPA documentation.

Monthly average Class I area-spe cific relative humidity values were employed in the extinction analysis (EPA, 2003, Table A-3). Species considered include SO 4 , NO 3 , EC, SOA (i.e., condensable organic emissions), soil, and co arse PM. With Method 6, background extinction coefficients are computed from EPA (2003) monthly estimates of concentrations of ammonium sulfate (BKSO 4 ), ammonium nitrate (BKNO 3 ), coarse particulates (BKPMC), organic carbon (BKOC), soil (BKSOIL), and elemental carbon (BKEC) . Values for these coefficients are listed in CALPOST input group 2 contained in Appendix C. The extinction due to Rayleigh scattering (i.e., the scattering of light by na tural particles much smaller than the wavelength of the light) was set to 10 Mm-1 (BEXTRAY = 1 0.0) for all modeled Class I areas.

Natural Background Light Extinction . The Appendix Y BART guidance recommends that visibility impacts should be evaluated against ‘natural’ background conditions. EPA (2003) describes the calculation of the annual averag e background extinction (in 1/Mm) for a Class I area using the area's annual f(RH) and average natural concentrations based on the area's geographic location. Annual average background ex tinction values (in 1/Mm) are converted to18 annual average Haze Index (HI) values (in deciview or dv). The average HI value is for the 20% best visibility days (Best Da ys (dv)) is estimated from 10 th percentile of the annual average HI value for a Class I area assuming a normal distribu tion. Thus, no average natural concentrations are provided for determining extinction for the 20% best visibility days. EPA maintains that the above definition of natural visibility baseline as the 20% best visibility days is likely to be reasonably conservative and cons istent with the Regional Haze Ru le goal of natural conditions.

There are major technical issues with this appro ach: (a) the same concentrations assumed at all Class I areas in the East or West, (b) the same concentrations assumed to occur every month of the year, and (c) fine sea salt and associated wa ter is not included. Also, in the calculation of 20% best visibility days, the sa me frequency distribution is assu med for every Class I area in the East or in the West. In other word s, ‘one size fits all’ (Tombach, 2004). But this really is not the

case.
The background extinction computation with Method 6 in CALPOST involves user-supplied monthly concentrations of SO 4 , NO 3 , PM coarse, organic carbon, soil, and elemental carbon species. In practice, concentrations for only 2 species, SO 4 ([BKSO 4 ]) and soil ([BKSOIL]), are frequently supplied in the CA LPOST input file to represen t hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic portions of background extinction, respectively. Furthermore, th e species concentrations are held constant over the annual cycle (i.e., no daily , monthly, or seasonal va riation). Finally, the EPA natural background default values are define d separately for the eastern and western U.S. result in natural background extin ction values that vary spatially and temporally only in response to the spatial distribution and monthly variation of climatol ogically-representative relative humidity values (EPA, 2003, Table A-3). Thus, the default definition of natural conditions does not take into account meteorologica lly caused visibility impairment.

Based on recent regulatory rulings, URS has opt ed to use the annual average method for calculating natural background conditions. The com ponents for the Eastern U.S. are provided in Table 6-1 and were input to the CALPOST model.

Impact Threshold . The EPA BART guidance recommends th at the threshold value for defining whether a source “contributes” to visibility impa irment is 0.5-dv change from natural conditions.

When 98 th percentile modeling is conducted the highe st modeled delta deciview value for each modeling day is determined by usin g CALPOST. The higher, of the 8 th highest value for each year or the 22 nd highest over the three year period valu e is compared to the 0.5-dv contribution threshold value. If the value exceeds the “cont ribution” threshold of 0.5-dv, the source will be subject to a BART evaluation. If the value is less than the “contributi on” threshold 0.5-dv, the source is exempted from the BART requirements.

Since the current regulatory versi on of CALPOST does not generate 98 th percentile results for a three-year period, URS used a simple spreadsheet to determine the 22 nd highest values for the three year period by importing the needed information from the CALPOST output file.19 Table 6-1 Default Natural Ba ckground Concentrations (μg/m 3 ) for Eastern U.S. Class I Areas (Source: EPA, 2003, Table 2-1)
Average Natural a

Concentration

East (μg/m 3 ) Error Factor Dry Extinction Efficiency (m 2 /g)
Ammonium sulfate b 0.23 2 3

Ammonium nitrate 0.10 2 3 Organic carbon mass c 1.40 2 4

Elemental carbon 0.02 2-3 10

Soil 0.50 1 1⁄2 -2 1

Coarse Mass 3.0 1 1⁄2 -2 0.6

a After Trijonis (1990) b Values adjusted to represent ch emical S3 species in current IMPROVE light extinction algorithm; Trijonis estimates were 0.1 μg /m 3 and 0.2 μg/m 3 of ammonium bisulfate.

c Values adjusted to represent chem ical species in current IMPROVE light extinction algorithm; Trijonis estimates were 0.5 μg/m 3 and 1.5 μg/m 3 of organic compounds.



## 7.0 REPORTING

7.1 CALPUFF Modeling Results The CALPUFF modeling results are summarized in Ta bles 7-1 and 7-2. The format of the tables was taken directly from the VISTAS common prot ocol. The modeling resu lts clearly indicate that the IP Augusta Mill BART eligible units do not cause or contribute to any visibility impairment in any Class I area within 300 kilo meters of the facility. Based on the modeling information and results presented in this repo rt, IP Augusta requests that the Georgia DNR review this modeling submittal for completeness and respond with a letter stating that the Augusta facility is exempt from any a dditional BART regulatory requirements.

Included with this report is a CD that includes the full set of CA LPUFF inputs and output files as well as other post-processor files used to genera te the results. As indicated in the VISTAS common protocol, regional CALP UFF-ready meteorological file s are not being supplied. The modeling information being supplied should be su fficient to allow an independent modeler to fully corroborate the CALPUFF modeling results.20 Table 7-1 BART Exemption Modeling Results for Eight Class I Areas IP Augusta Mill

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Delta-Deciview Rank 1-8 Delta-Deciview Rank 1-8 Delta-Deciview Rank 1-8 0.145 0.203 0.323 0.136 0.199 0.191 0.125 0.198 0.168 0.116 0.169 0.161 0.111 0.129 0.157 0.110 0.127 0.153 0.089 0.118 0.114 Cohutta

0.088 0.111 0.114 0.435 0.333 0.369 0.337 0.306 0.311 0.276 0.278 0.268 0.241 0.263 0.246 0.229 0.250 0.242 0.222 0.242 0.227 0.178 0.224 0.220 Cape Romain

0.177 0.198 0.211 0.178 0.364 0.214 0.158 0.160 0.176 0.113 0.151 0.176 0.092 0.131 0.137 0.084 0.092 0.114 0.079 0.090 0.108 0.074 0.087 0.094 Great Smoky

0.072 0.085 0.093 0.128 0.321 0.242 0.095 0.134 0.124 0.090 0.094 0.118 0.088 0.090 0.111 0.082 0.088 0.107 0.079 0.086 0.093 0.073 0.084 0.086 Joyce Kilmer

0.069 0.075 0.08621 Table 7-1, continued BART Exemption Modeling Results for Eight Class I Areas IP Augusta Mill

Class I Area 2001 2002 2003 Delta-Deciview Rank 1-8 Delta-Deciview Rank 1-8 Delta-Deciview Rank 1-8 0.237 0.338 0.216 0.232 0.134 0.157 0.223 0.123 0.136 0.220 0.119 0.125 0.171 0.118 0.122 0.157 0.101 0.110 0.145 0.100 0.101 Linville Gorge

0.103 0.094 0.098 0.264 0.335 0.257 0.204 0.319 0.221 0.165 0.268 0.198 0.155 0.254 0.161 0.125 0.197 0.158 0.125 0.164 0.151 0.113 0.160 0.140 Okefenokee

0.107 0.157 0.129 0.257 0.384 0.270 0.165 0.190 0.192 0.154 0.185 0.172 0.130 0.168 0.157 0.118 0.152 0.137 0.110 0.128 0.136 0.107 0.124 0.128 Shining Rock

0.091 0.107 0.127 0.325 0.241 0.324 0.269 0.177 0.314 0.197 0.175 0.299 0.135 0.172 0.141 0.128 0.168 0.139 0.120 0.168 0.138 0.104 0.157 0.124 Wolf Island

0.095 0.148 0.12122 Table 7-2 Summary of BART Exemption Modeling Results Three-Year Approach IP Augusta Mill

Class I Area Distance (km) From Source to Class I Area

Boundary No. of days with impact >0.5 dv in Class I Area: 2001 No. of days with impact >0.5 dv in Class I Area: 2002 No. of days with impact >0.5 dv in Class I Area: 2003 No. of days with impact > 1.0 dv in Class I Area

for 3-yr Period Max. 24-hr impact over 3-yr period 22 nd Highest Cohutta 294 0 0 0 0 0.110 Cape Romain 219 0 0 0 0 0.198 Great Smoky Mt 268 0 0 0 0 0.085 Joyce Kilmer 289 0 0 0 0 0.075 Linville Gorge 275 0 0 0 0 0.100 Okefenokee 254 0 0 0 0 0.129 Shining Rock 236 0 0 0 0 0.118 Wolf Island 226 0 0 0 0 0.12823 

## 8.0 REFERENCES

VISTAS, 2006. Protocol for the Application of the CALPUFF Model for Analyses of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART), December 22, 2005, Revision 3 – 7/17/06

CDPHE, 2005. CALMET/CALPUFF BART Protocol fo r Class I Federal Area Individual Source Attribution Visibility Impairme nt Modeling Analysis, prepared by the Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO.

Earth Tech, Inc., 2002. “Application of CALM ET/CALPUFF and MESOPUFF II to Compare Regulatory Design Concentrations for a Typical Long-Range Transport Analysis”, prepared for U.S. EPA, prepared by Earth Tech, Inc, Concord, MA.

EPA, 1995. “Interagency Workgroup on Air Qual ity Modeling (IWAQM): Assessment of Phase 1 Recommendations Regarding the Use of ME SOPUFF II”, EPA- 54/R-95-006. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S Environmen tal Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

EPA, 1998b. “An Analysis of the CALMET/CALPU FF Modeling System in a Screening Mode.” EPA-454/R-98-010. Office of Air Quality Planni ng and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

EPA, 1998c. “A Comparison of CALPUFF with ISC3.” EPA-454/R-98-020. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

EPA, 1998d. Phase 2 Summary Report and Recommendations for Modeling Long Range Transport and Impacts. Interagency Workgr oup on Air Quality Modeling (IWAQM). EPA454/R98-019, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, NC.

EPA. 1998e. “Response to Peer Review Comme nts of CALMET/CALPUFF Modeling System.” Research Triangle Park, NC. November.

EPA. 1999. “Response to Peer Review Comments of the Interagency Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling Phase 2 Summary Report and Recomme ndations for Modeling Long Range Transport Impacts.” Research Triangle Park, NC. February.

EPA. 1999. Regional Haze Re gulations; Final Rule. Federal Register, 64, 357 13-35774.

EPA, 2003. Guidance for Estimating Natural Vi sibility Conditions under the Regional Haze Rule. EPA-454/B-03-005. U.S. Environmental Prot ection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.

EPA, 2005. Regional Haze Regulations and Guidelines for Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Determinations. Federal Register, 70 (128), Wednesday, July 6, 2005.

Escoffier-Czaja, C., and J. Scire. 2002: The E ffects of Ammonia Limitation on Nitrate Aerosol Formation and Visibility Impacts in Class I Areas. Paper J5.13, 12 th AMS/A&WMA Conference on the Applications of Air Polluti on Meteorology, Norfolk, VA. May 2002.24 Escoffier-Czaja, C., and J. Scir e. 2005: Comments on the Computation of Nitrate Using the Ammonia Limiting Method in CALPUFF”, Earth Tech, Inc., Concord, MA.

Federal Register. 2003. 40 CFR Part 51. “Revisions to the Guidelines on Air Quality Models: Adoption of a Preferred Long Range Transport M odel and Other Revisions; Final Rule. Federal Register/Vol. 68, No 72/Tuesday April 15, 2003.

FLAG 2000. “Federal Land Managers’ Air Qual ity Related Values Workgroup (FLAG)”: Phase I Report. USDI – National Park Serv ice, Air Resources Division, Denver, CO.

Garrison, M., A. Gray, S.T. Rao, M. Scruggs, 19 99. “Peer Review of the Interagency Workgroup On Air Quality Modeling Phase 2 Summary Re port and Recommendations For Modeling Long Range Transport Impacts”, report compiled by: John S. Irwin Air Policy Support Branch, Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711.

Irwin, J.S., 1998b. “Interagency Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling (IWAQM): Phase 2 Summary Report and Recommendations for M odeling Long Range Transport Impacts.” EPA-454/R-98-019, Office of Air Qual ity Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, 151 pp. (NTIS Accession Number PB 99-121089).

Irwin, J.S. and J.P. Notar. 2001. Long-range-tra nsport screening techni que using CALPUFF. Proceedings of Guideline on Air Quality Modeling: A New Beginning AW&MA Specialty Conference. April 4-6, 2001, Newport, RI.

Grell, G.A., J. Dudhia, and D.R. Stauffer, 1995: A Description of the Fifth Generation Penn State/NCAR MM5, NCAR TN-398 -STR, NCAR Technical Note.

IWAQM. 1998. Interagency Workgroup on Air Qu ality Modeling (IWAQM) Phase 2 Summary Report and Recommendations fo r Modeling Long-Range Transport and Impacts on Regional Visibility. EPA-454/R-98-019. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Re search Triangle Part, NC.

Tonnesen G.S., R.E. Morris, M. Uhl, K. Briggs , J. Vimont and T. Moore. 2003. “The WRAP Regional Modeling Center – Application and Evaluation of Regional Visibility Models” presented at 96 th Annual Conference and Exhibition of the Air and Waste Management Association, San Diego, California.

Tombach, I., 2004. “Options for Estimating Natu ral Background Visibility in the VISTAS Region”, prepared for the VISTAS Technica l Analysis Work Group (TAWG), 15 January.

Tombach, I., and P. Brewer, 2005. Natural backgr ound visibility and regi onal haze goals in the Southeastern United States. Journal of the Air & Wast e Management Association. (in press).

Tombach, I., P. Brewer, T. Rogers, and C. Arrington, 2005a. “BART mo deling protocol for VISTAS: First Draft”, 22 March.25 Tombach, I., P. Brewer, T. Rogers, C. Arrington, J. Scire 2005b. “Protocol for the application of the CALPUFF model for analyses of Best Av ailable Retrofit Tec hnology (BART): VISTAS second draft”, 22 August.

Scire, J., I. Tombach, et al . 2005. Protocol for the applicat ion of the CALPUFF model for analyses of Best Available Re trofit Technology (BART): (VISTAS third draft), Prepared for the Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Associ ation of the Southeast (VISTAS), Prepared by Earth Tech, Inc., VISTAS Technical Analysis Work Group (TAWG), the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the West Virgin ia Department of Environmental Protection.

Scire, J.S., D.G. Strimaitis, and R.J. Yama rtino, 2000a: A User’s Guide for the CALPUFF Dispersion Model (Version 5). Ea rth Tech, Inc., Concord, MA.

Scire, J.S., F.R. Robe, M.E. Fernau, and R.J. Yamartino, 2000b: A User’s Guide for the CALMET Meteorological Model (Version 5). Earth Tech, Inc., Concord, MA.

Scire, J.S., Z-X Wu, D.G. Strimaitis and G.E. Moore, 2001: The Southwest Wyoming Regional CALPUFF Air Quality Modeling Study – Volume I. Prepared for the Wyoming Dept of Environmental Quality. Available from Earth Tech, Inc., 196 Baker Avenue, Concord, MA.

McNally, D. E., 2003. “Annual App lication of MM5 for Calendar Year 2001.” Prepared for the U.S. EPA, Office of Air Qualit y Planning and Standards, Prepared by Alpine Geophysics, LLC, Arvada, CO. 178 pp.

McNally, D. E., and T. W. Tesche, 2002. “Annua l Meteorological Modeling Protocol: Annual Application of the MM5 to the Continental United States”, prepared for the EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Ryan, P., D. Lowenthal and N. Kumar, 2004: Light Extinction Reconstruction in IMPROVE. Presented at the A&WMA Specialty Conference on Regional and Global Perspectives in Haze: Causes, Consequences and Controvers ies, Asheville, NC, 26-29 October 2004.

Johnson, M. T., 2003b. Iowa DNR 2002 Annual MM5 Modeling Project. Presented at the August 11 th , 2003 CENRAP Workgroup Meeti ng in Bloomington, Minnesota.

Johnson, M. T., 2005. CALPUFF Modeling Protocol in Support of Best Available Retrofit Technology Determinations”, Prepared by the Io wa Department of Natural Resources, Air Quality Bureau, Des Moines, IA.

LADCo, 2005. “Single Source Modeling to Support Regional Haze BART: Version 3”, Prepared by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), Des Plaines, IL.

Levy, J., J. Spengler, D, Hlinka, D. Sulliva n, and D. Moon, 2002. Using CALPUFF to evaluate the impacts of power plant emissions in Il linois: model sensitivity and implications. Atmospheric Environment. 36 (6). 1063-1075.26 Morris, R., C. Tana, and G. Yarwood, 2003. “Evalu ation of the Sulfate and Nitrate Formation Mechanism in the CALPUFF Modeling System”, Proceedings of the A&WMA Specialty Conference --Guideline on Air Qual ity Models: The Path Forward. Mystic, CT. 22-24 October.

Morris, R.E., B. Koo, T.W. Tesche, C. Loomis , G. Stella, G. Tonnesen, and Z. Wang. 2004a. Modeling protocol for the VISTAS Phase II regional haze modeling. (http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/vistas/vistas2/)

MPCA, 2005. “Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) Modeling Protocol to Determine Sources Subject to BART in the State of Mi nnesota”, prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, MN.

NDDH, 2005, “Proto col for BART-Related Visibility Impa irment Modeling Analyses in North Dakota”, prepared by the North Dakota Depart ment of Health, Division of Air Quality, Bismarck, ND.

NPS, 1993. “Interagency Workgroup on Air Quality Modeling (IWAQM) Phase 1 Report: Interim Recommendation for Modeling Long Range Transport And Impacts On Regional Visibility”, EPA-454/R-93-015, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Technical Support Division, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Scire, J.S. and F.R. Robe, 1997: Fine-Scale A pplication of the CALM ET Meteorological Model to a Complex Terrain Site. Paper 97-A1313. Air & Waste Management Association 90th Annual Meeting & Exhibition, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 8-13 June 1997.

Scire, J.S., F.W. Lurmann, A. Bass and S.R. Hanna, 1983: Development of the MESOPUFF II Dispersion Model. EPA-600/3-84-057, U.S. En vironmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.APPENDIX A – Emission Rates and Supporting InformationInternational Paper-Augusta Mill Emission Unit BART Eligibility Determination

EMISSION

UNIT ID EMISSION UNIT DESCRIPTION BART ELIGIBLE &

Modeled Started Operation Between 8/7/1962 and

8/7/1977 Comments

DIG1 No. 1 Digester Removed from Service under permit 2361-245-0006-V02-0 DIG2 No. 2 Digester NSPS/PSD Rebuild 1989 DIG3 No. 3 Digester

BSW1 No. 1 Pulp washer & screens Removed from Service under permit 2361-245-0006-V02-0 BSW2 No. 2 Pulp washer & screens X Does Not emit SO2, NOx, H2SO4 mist, or PM-10 BSW3 No. 3 Pulp washer & screens BP1A No. 1 Bleach Plant BP2A No. 2 Bleach Plant Reconstructed 1998 for ECF BP3A No. 3 Bleach Plant PM1A No. 1 Paper Machine PM2A No. 2 Paper Machine X X Modeled PM3A No. 3 Paper Machine PSD Rebuild 1990 EV1A No. 1 Evaporator Set EV2A No. 2 Evaporator Set X Does Not emit SO2, NOx, H2SO4 mist, or PM-10 EV3A No. 3 Evaporator Set RB2A No. 2 Recovery Boiler X X Modeled RB3A No. 3 Recovery Boiler ST2A No. 2 Smelt Dissolving Tnk X X Modeled ST3A No. 3 Smelt Dissolving Tnk LK1A No. 1 Lime Kiln LK2A No. 2 Lime Kiln LS1A No. 1 Lime Silo LS3A No. 3 Lime Silo CAU1 No. 1 Slaker/Causticizers X X Modeled CAU2 No. 2 Slaker/Causticizers GLC2 No. 2 GL Clarifier X Does Not emit SO2, NOx, H2SO4 mist, or PM-10 GLC3 No. 3 GL Clarifier PCF1 No. 1 Precoat Mud Filters PCF2 No. 2 Precoat Mud Filters WLF1 No. 1 WL & Mud Filters WLF2 No. 2 WL & Mud Filters PB1A No. 1 Power Boiler PB2A No. 2 Power Boiler X X Modeled PB3A No. 3 Power Boiler

RLYA Package Boiler X Exemption <250 mmBTU/hr;Limited Intermittent Use Boiler SB2A No. 1 Starch Bin Vent SB3A No. 3 Starch Bin Vent

SS1A No. 1 Starch Silo Removed from Service under permit 2361-245-0006-V02-0 SS2A No. 2 Starch Silo SS3A No. 3 Starch Silo BMPS BMP Spill Collection Sys. BMP system was installed with Cluster rule R8AA ClO2 Generator PPCC Condensate Collection Sys Condensate Collection was installed for cluster rule NCGS NCG System NCG System was installed with GA Odor rules

BLP1 No. 1 Black Liquor Pond X Removed from Service under permit 2361-245-0006-V01-5

BLP2 No. 2 Black Liquor Pond To be removed from Service under permit 2361-245- 0006-V-01-5

2ABF No.2 A/B Filtrate Tank X Does Not emit SO2, NOx, H2SO4 mist, or PM-10; vent to be collected under permit 2631-245-0006-V-01-5 HLRD Haul Roads WWTP Wastetreatment Facilities WOOD Wood, Bark, Log Handling (1) Emission Units included in 2006 Air Quality Permit Renewal Application, Except Liquid Storage Strike-thru units are shutdown or soon-to-be shutdown, previously considered on BART eligibility analyses.INTERNATIONAL PAPER - AUGUSTA MILLBART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITSPOINT SOURCE STACK PARAMETERSUTMEmission System Coordinates Base Stack Horiz Vert Stack StackSource Source X Y Elevation Height Dimension Dimension Temp Velocity Diameter FlowID1DescriptionType meters meters meters meters meters metersKm/sec meters ACFMPM2A No. 2 Paper Machine V 411142.09 3688250.00 50.5 19.5 14.8 9.1 -- -- -- --PB2A No. 2 Power Boiler P 411316.00 3688176.25 50.5 60.96 -- -- 518.7 20.6 2.74 257,340RB2A No. 2 Recovery Boiler P 411375.41 3688129.25 50.5 60.96 -- -- 430.93 21.8 2.44 215,698ST2ANo. 2 Smelt Dissolving TnkP 411313.84 3688110.25 50.5 39.40 -- -- 336.7 17.8 1.05 32,854Note - although the Riley package boiler falls within the operational time frame for BART eligible units, it was not modeled asit is a backup boiler <250 MMBtu/hr (not integral to the process).URS PROJECT NO. 31825278P:\Common_Projects\2006\BART Exemption Modeling\REPORTS\IP Augusta\BART Tables June06 no Riley 7/28/2006INTERNATIONAL PAPER - AUGUSTA MILLBART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITSMODELED SO2 EMISSION RATESEmissionSO2SO2SO2Source Source Emission Units Throughput Units Emission Emission EmissionID Description Type Factor Rate (lb/hr) Rate (lb/day) Rate (g/sec)PM2ANo. 2 Paper Machine1V 5.88E-04 lb/MMBtu 28 MMBtu/hr 0.02 0.4 0.00PB2ANo. 2 Power Boiler Coal Firing2P1.32 lb/MMBtu 520 MMBtu/hr 687.52 16,500.5886.63RB2A No. 2 Recovery Boiler3P 2.29 lb/TBLS 36.5 TBLS/hr83.5 2005.1 10.527ST2ANo. 2 Smelt Tank4P 0.005 lb/TBLS 36.5 TBLS/hr 0.2 4 0.021. No. 2 Paper Machine emission rate based on maximum natural gas usage from the No. 2 PM Nos. 1 and 2 IR and Aircap coaters and the SO2 emission factor from AP-42,Section 1.4-2 dated 7/98, and assumes a heating value of 1020 Btu/SCF.2. No. 2 Power Boiler worst case actual emissions are based on the historical max coal rate with a balance of natural gas to total the unit's maximum firing rate.Coal emission factor is based on a sulfur content of 0.86%. No SO2 from natural gas. SO2 from NCG burning is not included asthis is a back-up unit for NCG control.3. No. 2 Recovery Boiler emissions are based on black liquor solids firing (i.e., does not include auxilary fuel firing). Emission factor is from TB 884, dated 8/04, Table 4-11.4. No. 2 Smelt Tank emission factor is from TB 884, dated 8/04, Table 4-15.INTERNATIONAL PAPER - AUGUSTA MILLBART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITSMODELED H2SO4 EMISSION RATESEmissionH2SO4H2SO4H2SO4Source Source Emission Units Throughput Units Emission Emission EmissionID Description Type Factor Rate (lb/hr) Rate (lb/day) Rate (g/sec)PB2ANo. 2 Power BoilerCoal Firing1P1.98E-02 lb/MMBtu 520 MMBtu/hr 10.32 247.681.30RB2ANo. 2 Recovery Boiler2P 0.008 lb/TBLS 36.5 TBLS/hr 0.3 7 0.041. No. 2 Power Boiler based on maximum historical coal firing rate. Emission factor from NCASI SARA Section Form R Reportingand EPA SARA Guidancedocument EPA-745-R-97-007, dated 4/05.2. No. 2 Recovery Boiler emissions are based on max black liquor solids firing (i.e., does not include auxilary fuel firing).Emission factor is from TB 858,dated 2/03, Table 13a.INTERNATIONAL PAPER - AUGUSTA MILLBART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITSMODELED NOx EMISSION RATESEmissionNOx NOx NOxSource Source Emission Units Throughput Units Emission Emission EmissionID Description Type Factor Rate (lb/hr) Rate (lb/day) Rate (g/sec)PM2ANo. 2 Paper Machine1V 0.033 lb/MMBtu 28 MMBtu/hr 1 22 0.12PB2ANo. 2 Power Boiler Coal Firing - coal2P0.45 lb/MMBtu 520 MMBtu/hr 234.52 5,628.4829.55PB2ANo. 2 Power Boiler Coal Firing - NG2P0.19 lb/MMBtu 157 MMBtu/hr 29.20 700.853.68PB2A No. 2 Power Boiler Coal Firing - total P263.72 6,329.33 33.23RB2ANo. 2 Recovery Boiler3P 1.09 lb/TBLS 36.5 TBLS/hr39.77 9545.01ST2ANo. 2 Smelt Dissolving Tank4P 0.02 lb/TBLS 36.5 TBLS/hr 0.7 18 0.091. No. 2 Paper Machine emission rate based on natural gas usage from the Nos. 1 and 2 IR and Aircap coaters. The emission factor is from AP-42, dated 7/98, Section 1.4-2and assumes a heating value of 1020 Btu/SCF.2. No. 2 Power Boiler worst case emissions are based on max historical coal firing rate with a balance of natural gas to totalthe unit's maximum firing rate (677 MMBtu/hr).Coal emission factor average NOx factor from EPA Database of Wall-fired, Dry Bottom Coal Boilers. The natural gas emission factor is from AP-42, dated 7/98,Section 1.4-2 assuming a heating value of 1020 Btu/SCF.3. No. 2 Recovery Boiler emissions are based on max black liquor solids firing only (i.e., does not include auxilary fuel firing). Emission factor is from TB 884, Table 4.11.4. The emission factor for the No. 2 Smelt Tank is taken from NCASI TB 884, Table 4.15, median emission factor.INTERNATIONAL PAPER - AUGUSTA MILLBART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITSMODELED PM EMISSION RATESFilterable PMPM10 PM2.5 CoarseFilterable Filterable Condensible Condensible Short Term Short Term Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission EmissionSource SourceEmission Factor Emission Factor Emission Factor Emission Factor Activity Activity Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate RateID DescriptionRef (lb/unit) Units (lb/unit) Units Factor Factor Units (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s)6.0-10.0 μm 2.5-6.0 μmCAU1 No. 1 Slaker/Causticizer1 0.022 lb/TCaO -- -- 11 TCaO/hr 0.25 3.11E-02 0.23 2.89E-02 0.04 5.18E-03 0.04 5.18E-03PB2A No. 2 Power Boiler Coal Firing2 0.715 lb/MMBtu 0.056 lb/MMBtu 520 MMBtu/hr 284.67 3.59E+01 204.48 2.58E+01 33.46 4.22E+00 40.90 5.15E+00PM2A No. 2 Paper Machine 3 0.002 lb/MMBtu 0.006 lb/MMBtu 28 MMBtu/hr 0.21 2.66E-02 0.21 2.66E-02 -- -- -- --RB2A No. 2 Recovery Furnace 4 3.78 lb/hr 2.376 lb/hr 1 unitless 4.73 5.96E-01 3.31 4.17E-01 0.33 4.10E-02 0.54 6.86E-02ST2A No. 2 Smelt Tank 5 3.13 lb/hr 0.595 lb/hr 1 unitless 3.33 4.20E-01 3.03 3.82E-01 0.03 4.34E-03 0.22 2.80E-02Example CalculationsPM10 Emission Rate (lb/hr) = (Filterable Emission Factor (lb/unit) + Condensible Emission Factor (lb/unit)) * Short Term Activity Factor (units/hr) * PM Size FractionPM2.5 Emission Rate (lb/hr) = (Filterable Emission Factor (lb/unit) + Condensible Emission Factor (lb/unit)) * Short Term Activity Factor (units/hr) * PM Size FractionFilterable Coarse PM Emission Rate (lb/hr) = Filterable Emission Factor (lb/unit) * Short Term Activity Factor (units/hr) * PMSize FractionFilterable Soil PM Emission Rate (lb/hr) = Filterable Emission Factor (lb/unit) * Short Term Activity Factor (units/hr) * (1 -PEC (%) ) * PM Size FractionFilterable Elemental Carbon PM Emission Rate (lb/hr) = Filterable Emission Factor (lb/unit) * Short Term Activity Factor (units/hr) * PEC (%) * PM Size FractionOrganic Condensible PM Emission Rate (lb/hr) = Condensible Emission Factor (lb/unit) * Short Term Activity Factor (units/hr) *Organic PM (%)Inorganic Condensible PM Emission Rate (lb/hr) = Condensible Emission Factor (lb/unit) * Short Term Activity Factor (units/hr)* Inorganic PM (%)References1. Filterable PM rate from No. 1 Slaker/Causticizer is based on No. 1 Lime Kiln production and slaker vent emission factor from TB 884, Table 4.14; no condensible PM. PM10 assumed to equal PM.Filterable PM10 and 2.5 size fraction data based on Lime Kiln fraction from TB 884, Table 4.13. No other filterable PM size fraction data available. Filterable PM divided equally among size categories.2. Filterable PM rate from No. 2 Power Boiler based on maximum historical coal firing rate, balance natural gas. Emission factor from GA 391-3-1.02(2)(d)2(ii). (PM=0.7*(10/R)^0.202 lb/MMBtu)Condensible PM based on AP-42 Section 1.1, Table 1.1-5, CPM = 0.1S-0.03 lb/MMBtu, assume 0.86% sulfur in coal. Contribution of PM from natural gas assumed negligible.Filterable PM size fraction data from AP-42 Section 1.1, Table 1.1-6, scrubber controlled.3. Filterable and condensible PM rates from No. 2 Paper Machine are based on AP-42 Table 1.4-2 and natural gas usage by the aircap and IR dryers.Per AP-42 Section 1.4, all PM is assumed to be less than 1.0 micrometer in diameter. PM divided evenly between sizes 1 micrometer and below.4. Filterable PM rate from actual MACT II stack testing results (lb/hr). Condensible PM portion extrapolated from data in TB884, Table 4.11.PM10 size fraction data only from TB 884, Table 4.11. All other fraction data from AP-42 Section 10.2, Table 10.2-2 (ND for PM10).5. Filterable PM rate from No. 2 Smelt Dissolving Tank is Permit Condition 3.3.37. Condensible PM is assumed to be 19% of filterable per TB 884, Table 4.15.Filterable PM size fraction data from AP-42 Section 10.2, Table 10.2-7.6. Filterable and condensible PM rates from AP-42 Section 1.3, Tables 1.3-1 and 1.3-2, respectively.Filterable PM size fraction data from AP-42 Section 1.3, Table 1.3-6.7. No data for Condensible PM0.625 and PM1.0 fractions. Condensible PM is divided between the two fractions.P:\Common_Projects\2006\BART Exemption Modeling\REPORTS\IP Augusta\BART Tables June06 no Riley7/28/2006INTERNATIONAL PAPER - AUGUSTA MILLBART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITSMODELED PM EMISSION RATESFilterable PMCondensible PM7SoilElemental Carbon Organic InorganicEmission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission EmissionSource Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate RateID (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s)1.25-2.5 μm 1.0-1.25 μm 0.625-1.0 μm 0.5-0.625 μm 1.25-2.5 μm 1.0-1.25 μm 0.625-1.0 μm 0.5-0.625 μm 0.625-1.0 μm 0.5-0.625 μm 0.625-1.0 μm 0.5-0.625 μmCAU10.04 5.04E-03 0.04 5.04E-03 0.04 5.04E-03 0.04 5.04E-03 0.001 1.36E-04 0.001 1.36E-04 0.001 1.36E-04 0.001 1.36E-04 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --PB2A58.90 7.42E+00 14.72 1.86E+00 40.49 5.10E+00 73.62 9.28E+00 0.59 7.50E-02 0.15 1.87E-02 0.41 5.15E-02 0.74 9.37E-02 7.98 1.01E+00 7.98 1.01E+00 6.58 8.29E-01 6.58 8.29E-01PM2A -- -- -- -- 0.03 3.32E-03 0.03 3.32E-03 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.06 7.43E-03 0.06 7.43E-03 0.02 2.54E-03 0.02 2.54E-03RB2A 0.50 6.24E-02 0.23 2.95E-02 0.45 5.63E-02 0.83 1.04E-01 0.008 9.69E-04 0.004 4.59E-04 0.007 8.74E-04 0.013 1.62E-03 0.12 1.53E-02 0.12 1.53E-02 1.07 1.34E-01 1.07 1.34E-01ST2A 0.55 6.91E-02 0.27 3.42E-02 0.49 6.21E-02 1.19 1.50E-01 0.01 1.07E-03 0.004 5.31E-04 0.008 9.65E-04 0.019 2.34E-03 0.030 3.83E-03 0.030 3.83E-03 0.27 3.36E-02 0.27 3.36E-02TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTALCOARSE SOIL EC CONDENSIBLEEmission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission Emission EmissionSourceRate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate RateID(lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s) (lb/hr) (g/s)CAU1 No. 1 Slaker/Causticizer8.22E-02 1.04E-02 1.60E-01 2.02E-02 4.32E-03 5.45E-04 -- --PB2A No. 2 Power Boiler Coal Firing7.44E+01 9.37E+00 1.88E+02 2.37E+01 1.90E+00 2.39E-01 2.91E+01 3.67E+00PM2A No. 2 Paper Machine -- -- 5.27E-02 6.65E-03 -- -- 1.58E-01 1.99E-02RB2A No. 2 Recovery Furnace 8.69E-01 1.10E-01 2.00E+00 2.52E-01 3.11E-02 3.92E-03 2.38E+00 2.99E-01ST2A No. 2 Smelt Tank 2.57E-01 3.23E-02 2.51E+00 3.16E-01 3.89E-02 4.91E-03 5.95E-01 7.49E-02Source DescriptionP:\Common_Projects\2006\BART Exemption Modeling\REPORTS\IP Augusta\BART Tables June06 no Riley7/28/2006INTERNATIONAL PAPER - AUGUSTA MILLBART ELIGIBLE EMISSION UNITSMODELED PM EMISSION RATESPM size fraction data from CMAQSource/SCC Profile Name/Number Category % % Organic % InorganicPower Boiler - CoalNCOAL PM2_5 PEC 1.00% 54.79% 45.21%NCOAL PM2_5 PMFINE 62.50%10200202NCOAL PM2_5 PNO3 0.50%NCOAL PM2_5 POA 20.00%NCOAL PM2_5 PSO4 16.00%Recovery Furnace22044 PM2_5 PEC 1.53% 10.21% 89.79%& Smelt Tank22044 PM2_5 PMFINE 36.99%3070011022044 PM2_5 PNO3 0.35%3070010522044 PM2_5 POA 6.28%22044 PM2_5 PSO4 54.85%Package Boiler22003 PM2_5 PEC 7.70% 10.59% 89.41%Distillate oil22003 PM2_5 PMFINE 56.05%1020050122003 PM2_5 PNO3 0.24%22003 PM2_5 POA 3.84%22003 PM2_5 PSO4 32.17%Causticizing22045 PM2_5 PEC 2.63% 63.21% 36.79%3070012222045 PM2_5 PMFINE 40.91%22045 PM2_5 PNO3 0.37%22045 PM2_5 POA 35.69%22045 PM2_5 PSO4 20.40%Natural Gas Process Hea22004 PM2_5 PEC 0.00% 74.49% 25.51%3079000322004 PM2_5 PMFINE 19.45%22004 PM2_5 PNO3 0.55%22004 PM2_5 POA 60.00%22004 PM2_5 PSO4 20.00%P:\Common_Projects\2006\BART Exemption Modeling\REPORTS\IP Augusta\BART Tables June06 no Riley7/28/2006APPENDIX B - CALPUFF Configuration

The tables below identify the recommended CALPUFF configurations for VISTAS BART modeling. Also identified are the default recommendations from the IWAQM Phase 2 Report (EPA, 1998).

Input Groups in the CALPUFF Control File.

Input Group Description Applicable to BART Modeling

0 Input and output file names Yes 1 General run contro l parameters Yes 2 Technical options Yes 3 Species list Yes 4 Grid control parameters Yes 5 Output options Yes 6 Sub grid scale complex terrain inputs No
7 Dry deposition parameters for gases Yes 8 Dry deposition parameters for particles Yes 9 Miscellaneous dry depositi on for parameters Yes 10 Wet deposition parameters Yes 11 Chemistry parameters Yes 12 Diffusion and computational parameters Yes 13 Point source parameters Yes 14 Area source parameters No 15 Line source parameters No 16 Volume source parameters Yes 17 Discrete receptor information YesCALPUFF Model Input Group 1: General Run Control Parameters

Parameter Default IP Comments METRUN 0 0 All model periods in met file(s) will be run IBYR - 2001 Starting year IBMO - 1 Starting month IBDY - 1 Starting day IBHR - 1 Starting hour XBTZ - 5 Base time zone (6 = CST) IRLG - 8760 Length of run NSPEC 5 6 Number of MESOPUFF I I chemical species NSE 3 4 Number of chemical species to be emitted ITEST 2 2 Program is executed after SETUP phase MRESTART 0 0 Do not read or write a restart file during run NRESPD 0 0 File written only at last period METFM 1 1 CALMET binary file (CALMET.MET) AVET 60 60 Averaging time in minutes PGTIME 60 60 PG Averaging time in minutesCALPUFF Model Input Group 2: Technical Options

Parameter Default IP Comments MGAUSS 1 1 Gaussian distribution used in near field MCTADJ 3 3 Partial plume path terrain adjustment MCTSG 0 0 Sub-grid-scale complex terrain not modeled MSLUG 0 0 Near-field puffs not modeled as elongated MTRANS 1 1 Transitional plume rise modeled MTIP 1 1 Stack tip downwash used MSHEAR 0 0 (0, 1) Vertical wind shear (not modeled, modeled) MSPLIT 0 0 Puffs are not split MCHEM 1 1 MESOPUFF I I chemical parameterization Scheme MAQCHEM 0 0 Aqueous phase transformation not modeled MWET 1 1 Wet removal modeled MDRY 1 1 Dry deposition modeled MDISP 3 2 Dispersion coefficients from internally calculated sigma v, sigma w using micrometeorological calculated variablesCALPUFF Model Input Group 2: Technical Options

MTURBVW 3 3 Use both σ v and σ w from PROFILE.DAT to compute σ y and σ z (n/a) MDISP2 3 2 Dispersion coefficients from internally calculated sigma v, sigma w using micrometeorological calculated variables MROUGH 0 0 PG σ y and σ z not adjusted for roughness MPARTL 1 1 No partial plume pen etration of elevated inversion MTINV 0 0 Strength of temperatur e inversion computed from default gradients MPDF 0 1 PDF not used for dispersion under convective conditions MSGTIBL 0 0 Sub-grid TIBL module not used for shoreline MBCON 0 0 Boundary concentration conditions not modeled MFOG 0 0 Do not configure for FOG model output MREG 1 0 NO checks are madeCALPUFF Model Input Group 3: Speci es List-Chemistry Options.

CSPEC Modeled 1 Emitted 2 Dry Deposition 3 Output Group Number

SO 2 1 1 1 0 SO 4 -2 1 1 2 0 NOx 1 1 1 0
HNO 3 1 0 1 0 NO 3 - 1 0 2 0

NH 3 1 0 1 0 PMC 1 1 2 0 PMF 1 1 2 0 EC 1 1 2 0 SOA 1 1 2 0 Notes: 1 0=no, 1=yes 2 0=no, 1=yes 3 0=none; 1=computed-gas; 2=comp uted-particle; 3=user-specifiedCALPUFF Model Input Group 4: Map Projec tion and Grid Control Parameters.



### Parameter Default IP Comments PMAP UTM LCC Map Projection NX - 160 Number of X grid cells in meteorolog ical grid NY - 172 Number of Y grid cells in meteorolog ical grid NZ

- 10 Number of vertical layers in meteorological Grid DGRIDKM - 12 Grid spacing (km) ZFACE - 0, 20 40, 80, 160, 320, 640,

1200, 2000, 3000, 4000 Cell face heights in meteorological grid (m)

XORIGKM - 137.973 Reference X coordinate for SW corner of grid cell (1,1) of me teorological grid (km) YORIGKM - -1625.974 Reference Y coordinate for SW corner of grid cell (1,1) of me teorological grid (km) IUTMZN - 17 UTM zone of coordinates IBCOMP

- X index of lower left corner of the computational grid JBCOMP

- Y index of lower left corner of the computational grids IECOMP

- X index of the upper right corner of the computational grid JECOMP

- Y index of the upper right corner of the computational grid LSAMP T F Sampling grid is not used IBSAMP

- 0 X index of lower left co rner of the sampling Grid JBSAMP

- 0 Y index of lower left co rner of the sampling Grid IESAMP

- 0 X index of upper righ t corner of the sampling grid JESAMP

- 0 Y index of upper right corner of the sampling grid MESHDN 1 1 Nesting factor of the sampling gridCALPUFF Model Input Group 5: Output Options.



### Parameter Default IP Comments ICON 1 1 Output file CONC.DAT co ntaining concentrations is created IDRY 1 1 Output file DFLX.DAT c ontaining dry fluxes is Created IWET 1 1 Output file WFLX.DAT c ontaining wet fluxes is created IVIS 1 1 Output file containing re lative humidity data is created LCOMPRS T T Perform data compre ssion in output file IMFLX 0 0 Do not calculate mass fl uxes across specific boundaries IMBAL 0 0 Mass balances for each species not reported hourly ICPRT 0 1 Print concentration fields to the output list file IDPRT 0 0 Do not print dry flux fi elds to the output list file IWPRT 0 0 Do not print wet flux fields to the output list file ICFRQ 1 1 Concentration fields are printed to output list file every hr IDFRQ 1 1 Dry flux fields are printed to output list file every 1 hour IWFRQ 1 1 Wet flux fields are prin ted to output list file every 1 hour IPRTU 1 3 Units for line printer output are in g/m3 for concentration and g/m2/s for deposition IMESG 2 2 Messages tracking the prog ress of run written to

screen LDEBUG F F Logical value for debug output IPFDEB 1 1 First puff to track NPFDEB 1 1 Number of puffs to track NN1 1 1 Meteorological peri od to start output NN2 10 10 Meteorological period to end outputCALPUFF Model Input Group 6: Sub-Grid Scale Complex Terrain Inputs.

Parameter Default 

### IP Comments NHILL 0 0 Number of terrain features NCTREC 0 0 Number of special complex terrain receptors MHILL - 2 Input terrain and receptor data for CTSG hills input in CTDM format XHILL2M 1 1 Conversion factor for changi ng horizontal dimensions to meters ZHILL2M 1 1 Conversion factor for changing vertical dimensions to meters XCTDMKM - 0.0 E+00 X origin of CTDM system relative to CALPUFF coordinate system (km) YCTDMKM - 0.0 E+00 Y origin of CTDM system relative to CALPUFF coordinate system (km)

CALPUFF Model Input Group 7: Dry De position Parameters for Gases.

Species Default IP Comments
SO 2 0.1509 0.1509 Diffusivity 1000. 1000. Alpha star 8.0 8.0 Reactivity 0.0 0.0 Mesophyll resistance 0.04 0.04 Henry’s Law coefficient
NO x 0.1656 0.1656 Diffusivity 1.0 1.0 Alpha star 8.0 8.0 Reactivity 5.0 5.0 Mesophyll resistance 3.5 3.5 Henry’s Law coefficient
HNO 3 0.1628 0.1628 Diffusivity 1.0 1.0 Alpha star 18.0 18.0 Reactivity 0.0 0.0 Mesophyll resistance 8.0E-8 8.0E-8 Henry’s Law coefficient 0.000359 0.000359 Henry’s Law coefficientCALPUFF Model Input Group 8: Dry Depo sition Parameters for Particles.

Species Default IP Comments SO 4 0.48 0.48 Geometric mass mean diameter of SO4 -2 [μm] NO 3 2.0 0.48 Geometric mass mean diameter of NO3 - [μm] PMC 2.0 0.48 Geometric mass me an diameter of PMC [μm] PMF 2.0 0.48 Geometric mass me an diameter of PMF [μm]

EC 2.0 0.48 Geometric mass me an diameter of EC [μm] SOA 0.48 0.48 Geometric mass me an diameter of SOA [μm] (Geometric Standard Deviation for all species assumed to be 2.0 μm).

CALPUFF Model Input Group 9: Miscella neous Dry Deposition Parameters.

Parameter Default IP Comments RCUTR 30 30 Reference cuticle resistance (s/cm) RGR 10 10 Reference ground resistance (s/cm) REACTR 8 8 Reference pollutant reactivity NINT 9 9 Number of particle size intervals for effective particle deposition velocity IVEG 1 1 Vegetation in non-irrigat ed areas is active and unstressedCALPUFF Model Input Group 10: Wet Deposition Parameters.

Default IP Comments
SO 2 3.21E-05 3.21E-05 Scavenging coeffi cient for liquid precipitation [s -1 ] 0.0 0.0 Scavenging coefficien t for frozen precipitation [s -1 ] SO 4 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 Scaven g in g coefficient for li q uid p reci p itation [ s - 1 ]

3.0E-05 3.0E-05 Scavenging coeffi cient for frozen precipitation [s -1 ]
HNO 3 6.0E-05 6.0E-05 Scavenging coeffi cient for liquid precipitation [s -1 ] 0.0 0.0 Scavenging coefficien t for frozen precipitation [s -1 ]

NO 3 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 Scaven g in g coefficient for li q uid p reci p itation [ s - 1 ] 3.0E-05 3.0E-05 Scavenging coeffici ent for frozen precipitation [s -1 ]

NH 3 8.0E-05 8.0E-05 Scavenging coeffi cient for liquid precipitation [s -1 ] 0.0 0.0 Scavenging coefficien t for frozen precipitation [s -1 ] PMC 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 Scavenging coeffi cient for liquid precipitation [ s-1 ] 3.0E-05 3.0E-05 Scavenging coeffi cient for frozen precipitation [s -1 ] PMF 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 Scavenging coeffi cient for liquid precipitation [ s-1 ] 3.0E-05 3.0E-05 Scavenging coeffi cient for frozen precipitation [s -1 ] EC 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 Scavenging coeffi cient for liquid precipitation [ s-1 ] 3.0E-05 3.0E-05 Scavenging coeffi cient for frozen precipitation [s -1 ]

OC 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 Scavenging coeffi cient for liquid precipitation [ s-1 ] 3.0E-05 3.0E-05 Scavenging coeffi cient for frozen precipitation [s -1 ]CALPUFF Model Input Group 11: Chemistry Parameters.

Parameter Default IP Comments MOZ 1 1 Read ozone backgr ound concentrations from ozone.dat file (measured values). BCKO3 12*80 12*40 Background ozon e concentration (ppb) BCKNH3 12*10 12*0.5 Background amm onia concentration (ppb) RNITE1 0.2 0.2 Nighttime NO 2 loss rate in percent/hour RNITE2 2 2 Nighttime NOX loss rate in percent/hour RNITE3 2 2 Nighttime HNO 3 loss rate in percent/hour MH202 1 1 Background H2O2 concentrations (Aqueous phase transformation s not modeled) BCKH202 1 1 Background monthly H2O2 concentrations (Aqueous phase transf ormations not modeled) BCKPMF 1. 1. Fine particulate conc entration for SOA Option (micrograms per cubic meter) OFRAC .2 .2 Organic fraction of fine particulate for SOA Option VCNX 50. 50. VOC/NOx rati o for SOA Option

CALPUFF Model Input Group 12: Disp ersion/Computational Parameters.

Parameter Default IP Comments

SYDEP 550 550 Horizontal size of a puff in meters beyond which the time dependant dispersion equation of Heffter (1965) is used

MHFTSZ 0 0 Do not use Heffter formulas for sigma z JSUP 5 5 Stability class used to determine dispersion rates for puffs above boundary layer CONK1 0.01 0.01 Vertical dispersion constant for stable Conditions CONK2 0.1 0.1 Vertical dispersi on constant for neutral/stable conditionsParameter Default IP Comments

TBD 0.5 0.5 Use ISC transition point for determining the transition poi nt between the Schulman-Scire to Huber-Snyder Building Downwash scheme

IURB1 10 10 Lower range of land use categories for which urban disper sion is assumed IURB2 19 19 Upper range of land use categories for which urban disper sion is assumed
ILANDUIN 20 * Land use category for modeling domain XLAIIN 3.0 * Leaf area index fo r modeling domain ZOIN -0.25 * Roughness length in meters for modeling domain

ELEVIN 0.0 * Elevation above sea level XLATIN -999 - North latitude of station in degrees XLONIN -999 - South latitude of station in degrees ANEMHT 10 10 Anemometer height in meters ISIGMAV 1 1 Sigma-v is read fo r lateral turbulence data IMIXCTDM 0 0 Predicted mixi ng heights are used XMXLEN 1 1 Maximum length of emitted slug in meteorological grid units XSAMLEN 1 10 Maximum travel dist ance of slug or puff in meteorological grid units during one sampling unit MXNEW 99 60 Maximum number of puffs or slugs released from one source during one time step MXSAM 99 60 Maximum number of sampling steps during one time step for a puff or slug NCOUNT 2 2 Number of iterations used when computing the transport wind for a sampling step that includes transitional plume riseParameter Default IP Comments

SYMIN 1 1 Minimum sigma y in me ters for a new puff or slug SZMIN 1 1 Minimum sigma z in me ters for a new puff or slug SVMIN .50 .50 Minimum lateral turbulence velocities (m/s) SWMIN 0.20, 0.12, 0.08, 0.06, 0.03, 0.016 0.20, 0.12, 0.08, 0.06, 0.03, 0.016 Minimum vertical turbulence velocities (m/s)

WSCALM 0.5 0.5 Minimum non-calm wind speeds (m/s) XMAXZI 3000. 3000. Maximum mixing height (m) XMINZI 50. 20. Minimum mixing height (m) SL2PF 10. 10. Maximum Sy/puff length PLXO 0.07, 0.07, 0.10, 0.15, 0.35, 0.55 0.07, 0.07, 0.10, 0.15, 0.35, 0.55 Wind speed power-law exponents

WSCAT 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 Upper bounds 1 st 5 wind speed classes

PGGO 0.020, 0.035 0.020, 0.035 Potential temp gradients PG E & F (deg/km) CDIV 0.01 0.01 Divergence criterion for dw/dz (1/s) PPC 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.35, 0.35 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.35, 0.35 Plume path coefficients (only if MCTADJ=3)

NSPLIT 3 3 Number of puffs when puffs split IRESPLIT - 1900 Hour(s) when puff is eligible to split ZISPLIT 100 100 Previous hour’s minimum mixing height, m ROLDMAX 0.25 0.25 Previous Max mixing height/current mixing height ratio, must be less than this value to allow puff to split

NSPLITH 5 5 Number of puffs re sulting from a split SYSPLITH 1.0 1.0 Minimum sigma-y of pu ff before it may splitParameter Default IP Comments

SHSPLITH 2.0 2.0 Minimum puff elongation rate from wind shear before pu ff may split CNSPLITH 1.0E-07 1.0E-07 Minimum species conc entration before a puff may split EPSSLUG 1.0E-04 1.0E-04 Criter ion for SLUG sampling EPSAREA 1.0E-06 1.0E-06 Cr iterion for area so urce integration DSRISE 1.0 1.0 Trajectory step length for numerical rise algorithm Note: Values indicated by an asterisk (*) we re allowed to vary spatially across the domain and were ob tained from CALMET

CALPUFF Model Input Group 13: Point Source Parameters.

Parameter Default IP Comments NPT1 - 4 Number of point sources with constant stack parameters or variable emission rate scale factors

IPTU 1 3 Units for point source emission rates are g/s NSPT1 0 0 Number of source-speci es combinations with variable emissions scaling factors NPT2 - 0 Number of point sources with variable emission parameters prov ided in external fileCALPUFF Model Input Group 14: Area Source Parameters.

Parameter Default IP Comments NAR1 0 Number of polygon area sources

IARU 1 1 Units for area source emission rates are g/m2/s NSAR1 0 - Number of source species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors NAR2 - - Number of buoyant polygon area sources with variable location and emission parameters

CALPUFF Model Input Group 15: Line Source Parameters.

Parameter Default IP Comments

NLN2 - - Number of buoyant line sources with variable location and emission parameters NLINES - - Number of buoyant line sources ILNU 1 - Units for line source emission rates is g/s NSLN1 0 - Number of source-species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors MXNSEG 7

- Maximum number of segments used to model each line NLRISE 6

- Number of distance at wh ich transitional rise is computed

XL - - Average line source length (m) HBL - - Average height of line source height (m) WBL - - Average building width (m) WML - - Average line source width (m) DXL - - Average separation between buildings (m) FPRIMEL - - Average buoyancy parameter (m4/s3)CALPUFF Model Input Group 16: Volume Source Parameters.

Parameter Default IP Comments

NVL1

- 1 Number of volume sources

IVLU 1

- Units for volume source emission rates is grams per second NSVL1 0 - Number of source-species combinations with variable emissions scaling factors IGRDVL - - Gridded volume source data is not used VEFFHT - - Effective height of emissions (m) VSIGYI - - Initial sigma y value (m) VSIGZI - - Initial sigma z value (m)

Table B-18. CALPUFF Model Input Group 17: Discrete Receptor Information.

Parameter Default IP Comments NREC - 1927 Number of non-gridded receptorsAPPENDIX C – CALPOST Configuration

The tables below identify the recommended CA LPOST processor screening configurations for VISTAS BART modeling.

Input Groups in the CALPOST Processor Control File.

Group Description Applicable to BART Modeling 0 Input and output file names Yes 1 General Run Control Parameters Yes 2 Visibility Parameters Yes 3 Output Options Yes

CALPOST Processor Input Group 1: General Run Control Parameters

Parameter DEFAULT IP Comments ISYR -- 2001 Starting year ISMO -- 1 Starting month ISDY -- 1 Starting day ISHR -- 0 Starting hour NPER -- 8760 Number of periods to process NREP 1 1 Process every hour of data? Yes = 1 ASPEC -- VISIB Process species for visibility

ILAYER 1 1 Layer/deposition code; 1 for CALPUFF concentrations A 0.0 0.0 Scaling factor, slope B 0.0 0.0 Scaling factor, intercept LBACK F F Add hourly background concentrations or fluxes? LG F F Process gridded receptors? LD F T Process discrete receptors? LCT F F Process complex terrain receptors? LDRING F F Report receptor ring results? NDRECP -1 -1 Select all discrete receptors IBGRID -1 -1 X index of LL corner of receptor grid JBGRID -1 -1 Y index of LL corner of receptor grid IEGRID -1 -1 X index of UR corner of receptor grid JEGRID -1 -1 X index of UR corner of receptor grid NGONOFF 0 0 Number of gridded receptor rows NGXRECP 1 0 Exclude specific gridded receptors, Yes = 0CALPOST Processor Input Group 2: Species Processing Information

Parameter Default IP Comments RHMAX 98 95 Maximum RH (%) used in particle growth curve LVSO4 T T Compute light extin ction for sulfate? LVNO3 T T Compute light extin ction for nitrate? LVOC T T Compute light extinc tion for organic carbon? LVMPC T T Compute light extincti on for coarse particles? LVMPF T T Compute light extincti on for fine particles? LVEC T T Compute light extincti on for elemental carbon? LVBK T F Include background in extinction calculation? SPECPMC PMC PMC Coarse particulate species SPECPMF PMF PM10 Fine particulate species EEPMC 0.6 0.6 Extinction efficiency for coarse particulates EEPMF 1.0 1.0 Extinction efficiency for fine particulates EEPMCBK 0.6 0.6 Extinction efficiency fo r coarse part. background EESO4 3.0 3.0 Extinction efficiency for ammonium sulfate EENO3 3.0 3.0 Extinction efficiency for ammonium nitrate EEOC 4.0 4.0 Extinction efficiency for organic carbon EESOIL 1.0 1.0 Extinction efficiency for soil EEEC 10.0 10.0 Extinction efficiency for elemental carbon

MVISBK 2 6 Method 6 for background li ght extinction: Compute extinction from speciated PM measurements. FLAG RH adjustment factor applied to observed & modeled sulfate and nitrate BEXTBTBK -- 10 Background extinction for MVISBK=1 (1/Mm) RHFRAC -- 10 Percentage of particles affected by RH

RHFAC 12*value Depends on Class

I Area Extinction coefficients for modeled and background hygroscopic species computed using EPA (2003) monthly RH adjustment factors BKSEC 0.02 0.02 Background elem. car bon extinct. coeff – east BKSO4 0.23 0.23 Background sulfate ex tinction co eff – east BKNO3 0.10 0.10 Background nitrate ex tinction co eff – east BKPMC 3.00 3.00 Background coarse part . extinction coeff – east BKSOC 1.40 1.40 Background organic car bon extinct. coeff – east BKSSOIL 0.50 0.50 Background soil ex tinction co eff – east BKSEC 0.02 0.02 Background elem. car bon extinct. coeff – east BEXTRAY 10.0 10.0 Extinction due to Ra yleigh scattering (1/Mm)CALPOST Processor Input Gr oup 3: Output Options

Parameter DEFAULT IP Comments LDOC F F Print documentation image?

IPRTU 1 3 Print output units (μg/m 3 ) for concentrations and (μg/m 2 /sec) for deposition L1HR T F Report 1 hr averaging times L3HR T F Report 3 hr averaging times L24HR T T Report 24 hr averaging times LRUNL T F Report run-length (annual) averaging times LT50 T F Top 50 table LTOPN F F Top ‘N’ table NTOP 4 4 Number of ‘Top-N’ va lues at each receptor ITOP 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 Ranks of ‘Top-N’ values at each receptor LEXCD F F Threshold exceedances counts THRESH1 -1.0 -1.0 Averaging time th reshold for 1 hr averages THRESH3 -1.0 -1.0 Averaging time th reshold for 3 hr averages THRESH24 -1.0 -1.0 Averaging time th reshold for 24 hr averages THRESHN -1.0 -1.0 Averaging time th reshold for NAVG- hr averages NDAY 0 0 Accumulation period, days NCOUNT 1 1 Number of exceedances allowed LECHO F F Echo option LTIME F F Time series option LPLT F F Plot file option LGRD F F Use grid format instead of DATA format LDEBUG F F Output informat ion for debugging?APPENDIX D – Class I Receptors in Lambert Conformal Coordinates

Great Smoky Mountains Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1201.214 -417.246 521.0 1201.891 -411.546 1221.0 1192.429 -409.210 852.0 1204.191 -416.805 521.0 1203.378 -411.325 1030.0 1193.915 -408.991 978.0 1189.038 -417.173 521.0 1204.865 -411.105 983.0 1195.402 -408.772 809.0 1190.527 -416.954 522.0 1206.352 -410.883 894.0 1196.889 -408.553 761.0 1192.015 -416.736 523.0 1207.840 -410.662 675.0 1198.376 -408.333 987.0 1193.503 -416.517 521.0 1209.327 -410.440 950.0 1199.863 -408.113 874.0 1194.992 -416.298 538.0 1210.814 -410.219 915.0 1201.349 -407.893 1147.0 1196.480 -416.079 550.0 1212.301 -409.996 732.0 1202.836 -407.673 1323.0 1197.968 -415.859 640.0 1213.788 -409.774 980.0 1204.322 -407.452 1221.0 1199.456 -415.639 607.0 1216.762 -409.328 1020.0 1205.809 -407.231 1097.0 1200.944 -415.419 523.0 1218.249 -409.105 886.0 1207.296 -407.010 800.0 1202.432 -415.199 548.0 1219.736 -408.881 615.0 1208.782 -406.788 942.0 1203.920 -414.978 524.0 1221.222 -408.657 680.0 1210.268 -406.566 1167.0 1205.408 -414.757 608.0 1176.335 -413.427 767.0 1211.755 -406.344 1052.0 1208.384 -414.315 546.0 1177.823 -413.211 919.0 1213.241 -406.122 1012.0 1209.871 -414.093 566.0 1179.311 -412.995 905.0 1214.728 -405.899 1002.0 1211.359 -413.871 541.0 1180.798 -412.778 911.0 1216.214 -405.676 1143.0 1212.847 -413.649 530.0 1182.286 -412.561 965.0 1217.700 -405.453 998.0 1181.330 -416.432 683.0 1183.773 -412.344 837.0 1219.186 -405.230 710.0 1182.818 -416.216 711.0 1185.261 -412.127 1055.0 1220.672 -405.006 998.0 1184.307 -415.999 583.0 1186.748 -411.910 716.0 1222.158 -404.782 907.0 1185.795 -415.781 599.0 1188.235 -411.692 825.0 1223.644 -404.558 1200.0 1187.283 -415.564 561.0 1189.723 -411.474 609.0 1225.131 -404.333 1173.0 1188.771 -415.346 582.0 1191.210 -411.256 814.0 1226.616 -404.108 1067.0 1190.259 -415.128 703.0 1192.697 -411.037 1006.0 1228.102 -403.883 896.0 1191.747 -414.909 707.0 1194.184 -410.818 1036.0 1229.588 -403.658 799.0 1193.235 -414.690 522.0 1195.672 -410.599 732.0 1231.074 -403.432 683.0 1194.723 -414.471 760.0 1197.159 -410.379 746.0 1169.857 -410.632 330.0 1196.210 -414.252 846.0 1198.646 -410.160 929.0 1171.344 -410.418 523.0 1197.698 -414.033 952.0 1200.133 -409.940 1008.0 1172.831 -410.203 599.0 1199.186 -413.813 765.0 1201.620 -409.720 1288.0 1174.318 -409.988 769.0 1200.674 -413.593 1067.0 1203.107 -409.499 1266.0 1175.805 -409.772 831.0 1202.161 -413.372 915.0 1204.594 -409.278 1218.0 1177.292 -409.556 941.0 1203.649 -413.152 730.0 1206.081 -409.057 959.0 1178.779 -409.340 1150.0 1205.137 -412.931 822.0 1207.568 -408.836 681.0 1180.266 -409.124 1194.0 1206.624 -412.710 748.0 1209.054 -408.614 920.0 1181.753 -408.907 1084.0 1208.112 -412.488 544.0 1210.541 -408.392 1170.0 1183.240 -408.690 1206.0 1209.599 -412.267 706.0 1212.028 -408.170 956.0 1184.727 -408.473 1225.0 1211.087 -412.045 627.0 1213.515 -407.948 818.0 1186.213 -408.256 987.0 1212.574 -411.822 845.0 1215.001 -407.725 1223.0 1187.700 -408.038 1063.0 1214.061 -411.600 772.0 1216.488 -407.502 1270.0 1189.187 -407.820 873.0 1215.549 -411.377 836.0 1217.974 -407.279 872.0 1190.673 -407.602 921.0 1220.010 -410.707 665.0 1219.461 -407.055 694.0 1192.160 -407.384 1233.0 1175.112 -415.469 554.0 1220.947 -406.832 963.0 1193.646 -407.165 1006.0 1176.600 -415.254 760.0 1222.434 -406.608 859.0 1195.133 -406.946 1024.0 1178.088 -415.038 805.0 1223.920 -406.383 1000.0 1196.619 -406.726 792.0 1179.576 -414.822 703.0 1170.121 -412.460 365.0 1198.106 -406.507 1015.0 1181.064 -414.605 729.0 1171.608 -412.245 406.0 1199.592 -406.287 1094.0 1182.552 -414.388 699.0 1173.096 -412.030 600.0 1201.079 -406.067 996.0 1184.040 -414.171 1109.0 1174.583 -411.815 591.0 1202.565 -405.846 1148.0 1185.528 -413.954 1001.0 1176.070 -411.599 644.0 1204.051 -405.626 1368.0 1187.015 -413.737 811.0 1177.558 -411.383 1036.0 1205.537 -405.405 1052.0 1188.503 -413.519 522.0 1179.045 -411.167 1309.0 1207.024 -405.184 958.0 1189.991 -413.301 581.0 1180.532 -410.951 1262.0 1208.510 -404.962 988.0 1191.478 -413.082 629.0 1182.019 -410.734 1261.0 1209.996 -404.740 1019.0 1192.966 -412.864 634.0 1183.507 -410.517 1072.0 1211.482 -404.518 1344.0 1194.453 -412.645 582.0 1184.994 -410.300 1199.0 1212.968 -404.296 1246.0 1195.941 -412.426 612.0 1186.481 -410.083 1097.0 1214.454 -404.073 1377.0 1197.428 -412.206 944.0 1187.968 -409.865 720.0 1215.940 -403.850 1135.0 1198.916 -411.986 1281.0 1189.455 -409.647 640.0 1217.426 -403.627 1196.0 1200.403 -411.766 1427.0 1190.942 -409.429 873.0 1218.911 -403.404 851.0Great Smoky Mountains Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1220.397 -403.180 883.0 1181.220 -405.253 607.0 1200.267 -400.588 1222.0 1221.883 -402.956 1060.0 1182.707 -405.037 824.0 1201.752 -400.368 1524.0 1223.369 -402.732 1207.0 1184.193 -404.820 802.0 1203.237 -400.147 1386.0 1224.854 -402.508 1245.0 1185.679 -404.602 1033.0 1204.722 -399.926 1198.0 1226.340 -402.283 1045.0 1187.165 -404.385 1241.0 1206.208 -399.705 1242.0 1227.826 -402.058 1068.0 1188.651 -404.167 1297.0 1207.693 -399.484 1415.0 1229.311 -401.832 870.0 1190.137 -403.949 1503.0 1209.178 -399.262 1358.0 1230.797 -401.607 782.0 1191.623 -403.730 1477.0 1210.663 -399.040 1355.0 1241.194 -400.020 1326.0 1193.109 -403.512 1533.0 1212.148 -398.818 1403.0 1169.593 -408.805 453.0 1194.594 -403.293 1242.0 1213.633 -398.596 1712.0 1171.080 -408.590 439.0 1196.080 -403.073 1270.0 1215.118 -398.373 1431.0 1172.567 -408.376 582.0 1197.566 -402.854 1198.0 1216.603 -398.150 1422.0 1174.054 -408.160 664.0 1199.052 -402.634 1372.0 1218.087 -397.927 1236.0 1175.540 -407.945 770.0 1200.537 -402.414 1394.0 1219.572 -397.703 1228.0 1177.027 -407.729 853.0 1202.023 -402.194 1187.0 1221.057 -397.479 1492.0 1178.514 -407.513 810.0 1203.508 -401.973 1517.0 1222.542 -397.255 1372.0 1180.000 -407.297 979.0 1204.994 -401.752 1490.0 1224.026 -397.031 1181.0 1181.487 -407.080 809.0 1206.480 -401.531 1518.0 1225.511 -396.806 792.0 1182.973 -406.864 818.0 1207.965 -401.310 1632.0 1226.996 -396.581 939.0 1184.460 -406.646 1027.0 1209.450 -401.088 1692.0 1228.480 -396.356 737.0 1185.946 -406.429 1372.0 1210.936 -400.866 1888.0 1229.965 -396.131 1213.0 1187.432 -406.211 1203.0 1212.421 -400.644 1951.0 1231.449 -395.905 1173.0 1188.919 -405.994 975.0 1213.906 -400.422 1603.0 1235.902 -395.226 1111.0 1190.405 -405.775 1077.0 1215.392 -400.199 1543.0 1237.387 -395.000 1138.0 1191.891 -405.557 1343.0 1216.877 -399.976 1292.0 1238.871 -394.773 1362.0 1193.378 -405.338 1463.0 1218.362 -399.752 1067.0 1240.355 -394.545 1709.0 1194.864 -405.119 1193.0 1219.847 -399.529 928.0 1241.839 -394.318 1585.0 1196.350 -404.900 932.0 1221.332 -399.305 1190.0 1243.324 -394.090 1298.0 1197.836 -404.680 1059.0 1222.817 -399.081 1415.0 1244.808 -393.862 1224.0 1199.322 -404.461 1144.0 1224.302 -398.856 1066.0 1246.292 -393.633 1150.0 1200.808 -404.240 1231.0 1225.787 -398.632 899.0 1247.776 -393.404 1348.0 1202.294 -404.020 1197.0 1227.272 -398.407 714.0 1171.774 -402.894 383.0 1203.780 -403.799 1220.0 1228.757 -398.182 703.0 1173.260 -402.679 482.0 1205.266 -403.579 1342.0 1237.666 -396.825 1097.0 1174.746 -402.464 533.0 1206.752 -403.357 1350.0 1239.150 -396.598 1224.0 1176.231 -402.248 559.0 1208.237 -403.136 1251.0 1240.635 -396.370 1526.0 1177.717 -402.032 598.0 1209.723 -402.914 1467.0 1242.119 -396.142 1566.0 1179.202 -401.816 532.0 1211.209 -402.692 1407.0 1243.604 -395.915 1311.0 1180.688 -401.600 525.0 1212.694 -402.470 1671.0 1245.088 -395.686 1283.0 1182.173 -401.383 533.0 1214.180 -402.247 1369.0 1246.573 -395.458 1482.0 1183.659 -401.166 543.0 1215.666 -402.025 1412.0 1169.066 -405.151 290.0 1185.144 -400.949 562.0 1217.151 -401.802 1279.0 1170.552 -404.936 389.0 1186.630 -400.731 602.0 1218.637 -401.578 863.0 1172.038 -404.721 506.0 1188.115 -400.514 736.0 1220.122 -401.355 823.0 1173.524 -404.506 644.0 1189.600 -400.296 817.0 1221.608 -401.131 1103.0 1175.010 -404.291 578.0 1191.085 -400.077 809.0 1223.093 -400.906 1432.0 1176.496 -404.075 539.0 1192.571 -399.859 920.0 1224.578 -400.682 1448.0 1177.982 -403.859 634.0 1194.056 -399.640 1017.0 1226.064 -400.457 1352.0 1179.468 -403.643 662.0 1195.541 -399.421 1006.0 1227.549 -400.232 1094.0 1180.954 -403.427 567.0 1197.026 -399.201 956.0 1229.034 -400.007 802.0 1182.440 -403.210 579.0 1198.511 -398.982 1137.0 1230.519 -399.781 756.0 1183.926 -402.993 660.0 1199.996 -398.762 982.0 1239.430 -398.422 1213.0 1185.411 -402.776 878.0 1201.481 -398.541 1187.0 1240.915 -398.195 1312.0 1186.897 -402.558 907.0 1202.966 -398.321 1365.0 1169.330 -406.978 365.0 1188.383 -402.340 955.0 1204.451 -398.100 1245.0 1170.816 -406.763 393.0 1189.868 -402.122 1048.0 1205.936 -397.879 1074.0 1172.303 -406.548 455.0 1191.354 -401.904 1056.0 1207.420 -397.658 1365.0 1173.789 -406.333 590.0 1192.840 -401.685 1333.0 1208.905 -397.436 1401.0 1175.275 -406.118 775.0 1194.325 -401.466 1223.0 1210.390 -397.214 1080.0 1176.762 -405.902 690.0 1195.810 -401.247 1411.0 1211.874 -396.992 1260.0 1178.248 -405.686 697.0 1197.296 -401.028 1106.0 1213.359 -396.770 1660.0 1179.734 -405.470 678.0 1198.781 -400.808 1347.0 1214.844 -396.547 1703.0 1220.397 -403.180 883.0 1181.220 -405.253 607.0 1200.267 -400.588 1222.0 1216.328 -396.324 1525.0 1229.410 -392.480 1434.0 1245.449 -388.159 856.0 1217.813 -396.101 1299.0 1230.894 -392.255 1373.0 1246.932 -387.931 825.0Great Smoky Mountains Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1219.297 -395.878 1389.0 1232.378 -392.029 1170.0 1248.415 -387.702 1060.0 1220.782 -395.654 1084.0 1233.861 -391.803 1293.0 1249.898 -387.473 1125.0 1222.266 -395.430 1048.0 1235.345 -391.576 1077.0 1175.435 -396.767 429.0 1223.750 -395.206 1002.0 1236.829 -391.350 953.0 1176.920 -396.551 537.0 1225.235 -394.981 1374.0 1238.312 -391.123 1202.0 1178.404 -396.335 459.0 1226.719 -394.756 910.0 1239.796 -390.895 1602.0 1179.889 -396.119 575.0 1228.203 -394.531 1109.0 1241.279 -390.668 1433.0 1181.373 -395.903 564.0 1229.687 -394.306 1002.0 1242.763 -390.440 1106.0 1182.858 -395.686 646.0 1231.172 -394.080 1469.0 1244.246 -390.212 966.0 1188.795 -394.816 609.0 1232.656 -393.854 1136.0 1245.730 -389.984 1077.0 1190.279 -394.598 535.0 1234.140 -393.628 1324.0 1247.213 -389.755 884.0 1191.764 -394.379 489.0 1235.624 -393.401 912.0 1248.696 -389.526 1096.0 1193.248 -394.161 408.0 1237.108 -393.175 1427.0 1174.216 -398.810 459.0 1194.732 -393.942 669.0 1238.592 -392.948 1487.0 1175.701 -398.594 516.0 1196.216 -393.722 675.0 1240.076 -392.720 1681.0 1177.186 -398.378 579.0 1197.700 -393.503 789.0 1241.559 -392.493 1310.0 1178.670 -398.162 576.0 1199.184 -393.283 834.0 1243.043 -392.265 1080.0 1180.155 -397.946 656.0 1200.668 -393.063 852.0 1244.527 -392.037 1029.0 1181.640 -397.729 718.0 1202.152 -392.843 817.0 1246.011 -391.808 989.0 1183.125 -397.513 760.0 1203.636 -392.622 823.0 1247.494 -391.580 1038.0 1184.610 -397.295 994.0 1205.120 -392.401 750.0 1248.978 -391.351 1337.0 1187.579 -396.860 782.0 1206.603 -392.180 930.0 1172.995 -400.852 368.0 1189.064 -396.642 618.0 1208.087 -391.959 1127.0 1174.481 -400.637 411.0 1190.548 -396.424 489.0 1209.571 -391.737 726.0 1175.966 -400.421 485.0 1192.033 -396.206 549.0 1211.055 -391.515 1065.0 1177.451 -400.205 480.0 1193.517 -395.987 598.0 1212.538 -391.293 1323.0 1178.936 -399.989 569.0 1195.002 -395.768 577.0 1214.022 -391.070 1448.0 1180.422 -399.773 610.0 1196.486 -395.549 809.0 1215.505 -390.847 1548.0 1181.907 -399.556 585.0 1197.970 -395.329 899.0 1216.989 -390.624 1772.0 1183.392 -399.339 596.0 1199.455 -395.109 1006.0 1218.472 -390.401 1416.0 1184.877 -399.122 591.0 1200.939 -394.889 1262.0 1219.956 -390.177 1198.0 1186.362 -398.905 681.0 1202.423 -394.669 988.0 1221.439 -389.954 1225.0 1187.847 -398.687 787.0 1203.907 -394.448 1120.0 1222.922 -389.729 1580.0 1189.332 -398.469 528.0 1205.392 -394.227 1054.0 1224.406 -389.505 1529.0 1190.817 -398.251 700.0 1206.876 -394.006 860.0 1225.889 -389.280 1165.0 1192.302 -398.032 615.0 1208.360 -393.785 1013.0 1227.372 -389.055 1418.0 1193.786 -397.813 905.0 1209.844 -393.563 1203.0 1228.855 -388.830 1635.0 1195.271 -397.594 836.0 1211.328 -393.341 1212.0 1230.339 -388.605 1459.0 1196.756 -397.375 827.0 1212.812 -393.118 1380.0 1231.822 -388.379 1310.0 1198.241 -397.155 768.0 1214.296 -392.896 1300.0 1233.305 -388.153 1441.0 1199.725 -396.935 983.0 1215.780 -392.673 1206.0 1234.788 -387.926 1391.0 1201.210 -396.715 1281.0 1217.263 -392.450 1581.0 1236.271 -387.700 1337.0 1202.695 -396.495 1378.0 1218.747 -392.227 1457.0 1237.754 -387.473 1455.0 1204.179 -396.274 1371.0 1220.231 -392.003 1699.0 1239.236 -387.246 1336.0 1205.664 -396.053 1135.0 1221.715 -391.779 1543.0 1240.719 -387.018 1223.0 1207.148 -395.832 884.0 1223.198 -391.555 1640.0 1242.202 -386.791 1226.0 1208.632 -395.610 907.0 1224.682 -391.330 1476.0 1243.685 -386.563 979.0 1210.117 -395.389 1249.0 1226.166 -391.106 1036.0 1245.168 -386.335 1079.0 1211.601 -395.167 1528.0 1227.649 -390.881 1315.0 1246.650 -386.106 1104.0 1213.085 -394.944 1552.0 1229.133 -390.655 1504.0 1248.133 -385.877 858.0 1214.570 -394.722 1473.0 1230.616 -390.430 1469.0 1249.616 -385.648 1030.0 1216.054 -394.499 1677.0 1232.100 -390.204 1242.0 1178.139 -394.509 475.0 1217.538 -394.276 1553.0 1233.583 -389.978 1453.0 1179.623 -394.292 440.0 1219.022 -394.052 1572.0 1235.066 -389.751 1414.0 1181.107 -394.076 640.0 1220.506 -393.828 1526.0 1236.550 -389.525 1012.0 1191.495 -392.553 369.0 1221.990 -393.604 1261.0 1238.033 -389.298 1127.0 1192.979 -392.334 478.0 1223.474 -393.380 1217.0 1239.516 -389.071 1352.0 1194.462 -392.115 570.0 1224.958 -393.156 1247.0 1240.999 -388.843 1189.0 1195.946 -391.896 552.0 1226.442 -392.931 947.0 1242.482 -388.615 1257.0 1197.430 -391.677 843.0 1227.926 -392.706 1163.0 1243.966 -388.387 1048.0 1198.913 -391.457 604.0 1216.328 -396.324 1525.0 1229.410 -392.480 1434.0 1245.449 -388.159 856.0 1200.397 -391.237 605.0 1232.748 -384.503 1802.0 1235.155 -380.401 1247.0 1201.881 -391.017 652.0 1234.230 -384.277 1371.0 1236.636 -380.174 1168.0 1203.364 -390.796 770.0 1235.713 -384.050 1674.0 1238.118 -379.947 1012.0 1204.848 -390.575 834.0 1237.195 -383.823 1676.0 1239.599 -379.720 959.0Great Smoky Mountains Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1206.331 -390.354 725.0 1238.677 -383.596 1586.0 1241.081 -379.492 1366.0 1207.814 -390.133 608.0 1240.159 -383.369 1727.0 1242.562 -379.265 1348.0 1209.298 -389.911 656.0 1241.641 -383.142 1516.0 1244.044 -379.037 1526.0 1210.781 -389.689 1126.0 1243.124 -382.914 1359.0 1245.525 -378.808 1042.0 1212.265 -389.467 1115.0 1244.606 -382.686 1097.0 1214.134 -381.720 488.0 1213.748 -389.245 1387.0 1246.088 -382.457 1022.0 1215.616 -381.497 515.0 1215.231 -389.022 1569.0 1247.570 -382.229 1016.0 1217.097 -381.274 491.0 1216.714 -388.799 1595.0 1249.051 -382.000 732.0 1218.579 -381.051 550.0 1218.197 -388.576 1195.0 1198.372 -387.805 652.0 1220.061 -380.827 579.0 1219.680 -388.352 961.0 1199.855 -387.585 1164.0 1221.543 -380.603 781.0 1221.163 -388.128 1084.0 1201.338 -387.365 1129.0 1223.024 -380.379 900.0 1222.646 -387.904 1324.0 1202.821 -387.144 1070.0 1224.506 -380.155 1059.0 1224.129 -387.680 1732.0 1204.304 -386.924 942.0 1225.987 -379.930 1123.0 1225.612 -387.455 1720.0 1205.786 -386.703 668.0 1227.469 -379.705 1307.0 1227.095 -387.230 1512.0 1207.269 -386.481 425.0 1228.950 -379.480 1166.0 1228.578 -387.005 1680.0 1208.752 -386.260 532.0 1230.432 -379.254 1302.0 1230.061 -386.780 1528.0 1210.235 -386.038 696.0 1231.913 -379.028 1672.0 1231.544 -386.554 1452.0 1211.717 -385.816 673.0 1233.394 -378.802 1533.0 1233.026 -386.328 1535.0 1213.200 -385.594 775.0 1234.876 -378.576 1429.0 1234.509 -386.102 1401.0 1214.682 -385.371 1061.0 1236.357 -378.349 1457.0 1235.992 -385.875 1483.0 1216.165 -385.148 939.0 1237.838 -378.122 1391.0 1237.474 -385.648 1605.0 1217.647 -384.925 817.0 1239.319 -377.895 937.0 1238.957 -385.421 1574.0 1219.130 -384.701 763.0 1240.800 -377.668 1015.0 1240.439 -385.194 1577.0 1220.612 -384.478 616.0 1242.282 -377.440 1056.0 1241.922 -384.966 1326.0 1222.094 -384.254 877.0 1243.763 -377.212 1071.0 1243.404 -384.738 1393.0 1223.577 -384.029 892.0 1245.244 -376.984 1060.0 1244.887 -384.510 1134.0 1225.059 -383.805 910.0 1218.304 -379.225 427.0 1246.369 -384.282 971.0 1226.541 -383.580 1134.0 1219.785 -379.002 480.0 1247.851 -384.053 945.0 1228.023 -383.355 1358.0 1221.267 -378.778 488.0 1249.333 -383.824 1058.0 1229.506 -383.130 1512.0 1222.748 -378.554 624.0 1192.709 -390.508 492.0 1230.988 -382.904 1674.0 1224.229 -378.330 761.0 1194.193 -390.289 640.0 1232.470 -382.678 1806.0 1225.710 -378.105 732.0 1195.676 -390.070 587.0 1233.952 -382.452 1678.0 1227.191 -377.880 881.0 1197.159 -389.851 517.0 1235.434 -382.225 1725.0 1228.673 -377.655 821.0 1198.643 -389.631 876.0 1236.916 -381.999 1256.0 1230.154 -377.429 1000.0 1200.126 -389.411 983.0 1238.397 -381.772 1160.0 1231.635 -377.204 1094.0 1201.609 -389.191 850.0 1239.879 -381.544 1382.0 1233.116 -376.978 1208.0 1203.092 -388.970 776.0 1241.361 -381.317 1289.0 1234.597 -376.751 860.0 1204.576 -388.749 518.0 1242.843 -381.089 1584.0 1236.078 -376.525 857.0 1206.059 -388.528 555.0 1244.325 -380.861 1317.0 1237.558 -376.298 1391.0 1207.542 -388.307 487.0 1245.806 -380.633 1170.0 1239.039 -376.071 1265.0 1209.025 -388.085 626.0 1211.444 -383.990 548.0 1240.520 -375.843 1067.0 1210.508 -387.864 794.0 1212.926 -383.768 730.0 1235.155 -380.401 1247.0 1211.991 -387.641 824.0 1214.408 -383.545 699.0 1242.001 -375.616 921.0 1213.474 -387.419 1004.0 1215.890 -383.323 749.0 1243.482 -375.388 611.0 1214.957 -387.196 1101.0 1217.372 -383.099 624.0 1226.914 -376.055 608.0 1216.439 -386.973 1435.0 1218.854 -382.876 608.0 1229.876 -375.604 699.0 1217.922 -386.750 1039.0 1220.336 -382.652 530.0 1231.356 -375.379 785.0 1219.405 -386.527 765.0 1221.818 -382.428 797.0 1232.837 -375.153 892.0 1220.888 -386.303 961.0 1223.300 -382.204 1103.0 1234.318 -374.927 622.0 1222.370 -386.079 963.0 1224.782 -381.980 1110.0 1235.798 -374.700 762.0 1223.853 -385.855 1391.0 1226.264 -381.755 1130.0 1237.279 -374.473 1130.0 1225.336 -385.630 1485.0 1227.746 -381.530 1499.0 1238.759 -374.246 1458.0 1226.818 -385.405 1332.0 1229.228 -381.305 1742.0 1240.240 -374.019 1097.0 1228.301 -385.180 1520.0 1230.710 -381.079 1769.0 1241.720 -373.791 823.0 1229.783 -384.955 1705.0 1232.191 -380.853 1639.0 1243.201 -373.563 603.0 1231.266 -384.729 1572.0 1233.673 -380.627 1342.0 1232.558 -373.328 534.0 1200.397 -391.237 605.0 1232.748 -384.503 1802.0 1234.039 -373.102 545.0 1235.519 -372.875 582.0 1236.999 -372.649 735.0 1238.479 -372.422 885.0 1239.960 -372.195 873.0Great Smoky Mountains Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m)Cohutta Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1124.359 -493.51 903 1121.228 -487.412 557 1119.976 -483.854 426 1125.11 -493.407 958 1121.978 -487.309 598 1120.726 -483.751 458 1125.861 -493.304 1057 1122.729 -487.206 646 1121.477 -483.648 475 1123.482 -492.698 969 1123.48 -487.103 777 1122.227 -483.545 514 1124.233 -492.595 846 1124.23 -487 939 1122.977 -483.442 546 1124.984 -492.492 853 1124.981 -486.897 1000 1123.727 -483.339 623 1125.735 -492.389 873 1125.731 -486.794 1134 1124.478 -483.236 833 1121.104 -492.091 1070 1126.482 -486.691 1042 1125.228 -483.133 909 1121.855 -491.989 1189 1127.232 -486.587 1096 1125.978 -483.03 655 1122.606 -491.886 1015 1127.983 -486.484 905 1126.728 -482.927 841 1123.357 -491.783 893 1128.733 -486.38 796 1127.478 -482.823 717 1124.108 -491.68 763 1120.352 -486.6 498 1128.229 -482.72 579 1124.859 -491.576 732 1121.102 -486.497 532 1128.979 -482.616 680 1125.61 -491.473 805 1121.853 -486.394 579 1129.729 -482.513 838 1126.361 -491.37 962 1122.603 -486.291 620 1130.479 -482.409 810 1120.227 -491.279 934 1123.354 -486.188 753 1122.851 -482.527 578 1120.978 -491.176 926 1124.104 -486.085 971 1123.602 -482.424 640 1121.729 -491.073 1023 1124.855 -485.982 995 1124.352 -482.321 605 1122.48 -490.97 950 1125.605 -485.879 1063 1125.102 -482.218 722 1123.231 -490.867 823 1126.356 -485.775 912 1125.852 -482.115 654 1123.982 -490.764 762 1127.106 -485.672 1072 1126.602 -482.012 858 1124.733 -490.661 775 1127.857 -485.569 970 1127.352 -481.908 695 1125.484 -490.558 764 1128.607 -485.465 828 1128.102 -481.805 552 1126.235 -490.455 908 1120.227 -485.684 460 1128.852 -481.701 646 1120.102 -490.363 918 1120.977 -485.582 567 1129.603 -481.598 848 1120.853 -490.261 822 1121.727 -485.479 524 1130.353 -481.494 870 1121.604 -490.158 876 1122.478 -485.376 596 1131.103 -481.39 732 1122.355 -490.055 918 1123.228 -485.273 661 1122.726 -481.612 549 1123.106 -489.952 673 1123.979 -485.17 732 1123.476 -481.509 522 1123.856 -489.849 671 1124.729 -485.067 963 1124.226 -481.406 518 1124.607 -489.746 785 1125.48 -484.964 957 1124.976 -481.303 566 1125.358 -489.643 937 1126.23 -484.86 924 1125.726 -481.2 582 1126.109 -489.54 883 1126.98 -484.757 1039 1126.476 -481.096 709 1126.86 -489.436 967 1127.731 -484.654 867 1127.226 -480.993 619 1119.977 -489.448 785 1128.481 -484.55 846 1127.976 -480.89 598 1120.728 -489.345 821 1129.231 -484.447 715 1128.726 -480.786 732 1121.478 -489.243 846 1129.982 -484.343 734 1129.476 -480.683 896 1122.229 -489.14 766 1130.732 -484.239 761 1130.226 -480.579 949 1122.98 -489.037 610 1131.482 -484.136 798 1130.976 -480.475 760 1123.731 -488.934 793 1118.6 -484.974 476 1131.726 -480.372 644 1124.482 -488.831 959 1119.351 -484.872 488 1122.6 -480.697 579 1125.232 -488.728 928 1120.101 -484.769 446 1123.35 -480.594 511 1125.983 -488.624 1090 1120.852 -484.666 443 1124.1 -480.491 513 1126.734 -488.521 1154 1121.602 -484.563 549 1124.85 -480.388 549 1127.484 -488.418 1002 1122.352 -484.461 526 1125.6 -480.285 579 1128.235 -488.314 893 1123.103 -484.358 596 1126.35 -480.181 594 1120.602 -488.43 610 1123.853 -484.255 733 1127.1 -480.078 536 1121.353 -488.327 706 1124.603 -484.152 905 1127.85 -479.975 598 1122.104 -488.224 581 1125.354 -484.048 867 1128.6 -479.871 670 1122.854 -488.122 628 1126.104 -483.945 781 1129.35 -479.768 815 1123.605 -488.019 673 1126.854 -483.842 900 1130.1 -479.664 975 1124.356 -487.915 878 1127.605 -483.738 808 1130.85 -479.56 839 1125.106 -487.812 1099 1128.355 -483.635 638 1131.6 -479.457 696 1125.857 -487.709 1175 1129.105 -483.532 774 1123.225 -479.679 457 1126.608 -487.606 1139 1129.855 -483.428 881 1123.974 -479.576 457 1127.358 -487.503 1097 1130.606 -483.324 769 1124.724 -479.473 429 1128.109 -487.399 862 1118.475 -484.059 487 1125.474 -479.369 487 1120.477 -487.515 606 1119.226 -483.956 396 1126.224 -479.266 502 1126.974 -479.163 582 1127.724 -479.06 587 1128.474 -478.956 760 1129.223 -478.853 914 1129.973 -478.749 1039Cohutta Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1130.723 -478.645 917 1131.473 -478.542 903 1132.223 -478.438 654 1122.349 -478.867 456 1123.099 -478.764 495 1123.849 -478.661 400 1124.598 -478.558 519 1125.348 -478.454 630 1126.098 -478.351 582 1126.848 -478.248 611 1127.598 -478.144 769 1128.347 -478.041 610 1129.097 -477.938 701 1129.847 -477.834 915 1130.597 -477.73 890 1131.346 -477.627 762 1132.096 -477.523 616 1119.974 -478.26 310 1120.724 -478.157 408 1121.474 -478.054 449 1122.223 -477.951 476 1122.973 -477.849 449 1123.723 -477.746 468 1124.473 -477.642 482 1125.222 -477.539 615 1125.972 -477.436 647 1126.722 -477.333 614 1127.471 -477.229 747 1128.221 -477.126 942 1128.971 -477.023 893 1129.72 -476.919 955 1130.47 -476.815 874 1131.22 -476.712 662 1131.969 -476.608 636 1132.719 -476.504 544 1126.596 -476.418 717 1127.345 -476.314 750 1128.095 -476.211 982 1128.844 -476.107 1141 1126.469 -475.503 847 1127.219 -475.399 1013Shining Rock Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1273.44 -416.507 1629 1266.774 -412.878 1362 1274.184 -416.39 1586 1267.518 -412.762 1470 1274.928 -416.274 1370 1268.262 -412.646 1248 1275.672 -416.157 1274 1269.006 -412.529 1058 1276.416 -416.04 1181 1269.749 -412.413 1170 1268.832 -416.294 1183 1270.493 -412.296 1415 1269.576 -416.178 1416 1271.237 -412.18 1689 1270.321 -416.062 1541 1271.981 -412.063 1547 1271.065 -415.945 1677 1272.724 -411.946 1550 1271.809 -415.828 1640 1273.468 -411.83 1437 1272.553 -415.712 1770 1274.212 -411.713 1508 1273.297 -415.595 1679 1274.955 -411.596 1300 1274.041 -415.478 1585 1275.699 -411.479 1176 1274.785 -415.361 1529 1268.863 -411.617 1012 1275.529 -415.245 1309 1269.607 -411.501 1285 1276.273 -415.128 1128 1270.35 -411.384 1366 1267.946 -415.498 1097 1271.094 -411.268 1566 1268.69 -415.382 1217 1271.837 -411.151 1451 1269.434 -415.266 1536 1272.581 -411.034 1359 1270.178 -415.149 1463 1273.325 -410.918 1273 1270.922 -415.033 1436 1274.068 -410.801 1274 1271.666 -414.916 1629 1274.812 -410.684 1280 1272.41 -414.8 1771 1275.555 -410.567 1155 1273.154 -414.683 1622 1270.207 -410.472 1179 1273.898 -414.566 1425 1270.951 -410.355 1348 1274.642 -414.449 1312 1271.694 -410.239 1488 1275.385 -414.332 1362 1270.808 -409.443 1442 1276.129 -414.215 1067 1271.551 -409.327 1565 1276.873 -414.098 1162 1272.295 -409.21 1505 1277.617 -413.981 1399 1273.038 -409.093 1409 1267.059 -414.702 1029 1273.782 -408.977 1380 1267.803 -414.586 1227 1274.525 -408.86 1303 1268.547 -414.47 1505 1275.269 -408.743 1104 1269.291 -414.354 1347 1269.922 -408.648 1500 1270.035 -414.237 1317 1271.408 -408.415 1678 1270.779 -414.121 1536 1272.152 -408.298 1707 1271.523 -414.004 1675 1272.895 -408.181 1515 1272.267 -413.887 1729 1273.638 -408.065 1321 1273.011 -413.771 1523 1274.382 -407.948 1219 1273.754 -413.654 1544 1271.265 -407.503 1394 1274.498 -413.537 1429 1272.009 -407.386 1522 1275.242 -413.42 1315 1272.752 -407.269 1411 1275.986 -413.303 1068 1273.495 -407.152 1234 1276.73 -413.186 1066 1271.122 -406.59 1189 1277.474 -413.069 1352 1271.865 -406.474 1343 1266.173 -413.906 1024 1272.609 -406.357 1265 1266.917 -413.79 1296 1270.979 -405.678 1045 1267.661 -413.674 1404 1271.722 -405.562 1235 1268.404 -413.558 1373 1272.465 -405.445 1066 1269.148 -413.441 1198 1269.892 -413.325 1198 1270.636 -413.208 1419 1271.38 -413.092 1571 1272.124 -412.975 1741 1272.867 -412.859 1717 1273.611 -412.742 1616 1274.355 -412.625 1569 1275.099 -412.508 1422 1275.842 -412.391 1161 1265.287 -413.11 968 1266.03 -412.994 1198Okefenokee Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1401.401 -877.287 36.0 1404.777 -888.047 36.0 1388.045 -894.538 36.0 1399.829 -877.544 36.0 1403.202 -888.305 36.0 1399.375 -894.585 36.0 1403.275 -878.866 27.0 1401.627 -888.562 36.0 1386.469 -894.792 36.0 1401.701 -879.123 27.0 1400.052 -888.819 36.0 1417.01 -893.581 36.0 1400.128 -879.38 30.0 1398.477 -889.075 36.0 1397.799 -894.842 36.0 1398.555 -879.637 36.0 1416.101 -888.073 36.0 1415.434 -893.841 36.0 1396.982 -879.893 36.0 1396.902 -889.332 36.0 1413.858 -894.1 37.0 1405.148 -880.444 36.0 1414.527 -888.332 36.0 1384.894 -895.046 36.0 1403.575 -880.702 37.0 1412.952 -888.591 36.0 1396.223 -895.098 36.0 1402.002 -880.959 36.0 1395.327 -889.588 33.0 1412.282 -894.359 36.0 1400.428 -881.216 36.0 1411.377 -888.85 38.0 1410.706 -894.618 36.0 1398.855 -881.473 36.0 1409.802 -889.109 29.0 1394.647 -895.354 36.0 1397.281 -881.729 36.0 1393.752 -889.843 32.0 1409.131 -894.877 36.0 1408.596 -881.764 36.0 1408.227 -889.368 36.0 1393.071 -895.61 36.0 1407.023 -882.023 36.0 1392.177 -890.099 36.0 1407.555 -895.135 36.0 1405.449 -882.281 36.0 1406.652 -889.626 36.0 1405.978 -895.393 36.0 1403.875 -882.538 27.0 1405.077 -889.883 37.0 1391.495 -895.865 36.0 1402.302 -882.796 27.0 1390.602 -890.354 38.0 1404.402 -895.651 36.0 1400.728 -883.053 30.0 1403.502 -890.141 37.0 1389.918 -896.12 36.0 1399.154 -883.309 27.0 1401.927 -890.398 37.0 1402.826 -895.908 36.0 1397.58 -883.566 31.0 1400.352 -890.655 36.0 1401.25 -896.165 36.0 1396.006 -883.822 36.0 1398.776 -890.912 36.0 1388.342 -896.375 36.0 1412.045 -883.083 36.0 1416.404 -889.909 36.0 1399.674 -896.422 37.0 1410.472 -883.342 36.0 1397.201 -891.168 36.0 1386.766 -896.629 36.0 1394.432 -884.078 36.0 1414.829 -890.168 36.0 1417.313 -895.417 36.0 1408.898 -883.601 36.0 1413.254 -890.428 36.0 1398.098 -896.679 36.0 1407.324 -883.859 36.0 1395.626 -891.424 36.0 1415.737 -895.677 36.0 1405.75 -884.117 36.0 1411.679 -890.687 38.0 1385.19 -896.884 36.0 1404.176 -884.374 36.0 1410.103 -890.945 37.0 1414.16 -895.937 36.0 1402.602 -884.632 36.0 1394.051 -891.68 38.0 1396.521 -896.935 36.0 1401.028 -884.889 36.0 1408.528 -891.204 36.0 1412.584 -896.196 36.0 1399.453 -885.146 36.0 1392.475 -891.936 36.0 1411.008 -896.455 36.0 1397.879 -885.402 36.0 1406.953 -891.462 36.0 1383.613 -897.137 36.0 1415.496 -884.401 27.0 1405.378 -891.72 38.0 1394.945 -897.191 36.0 1413.922 -884.66 30.0 1390.9 -892.191 38.0 1409.432 -896.713 36.0 1396.305 -885.658 31.0 1403.802 -891.978 37.0 1393.368 -897.447 36.0 1412.347 -884.919 32.0 1389.324 -892.446 37.0 1407.855 -896.972 36.0 1394.731 -885.914 27.0 1402.227 -892.235 36.0 1406.279 -897.23 36.0 1410.773 -885.178 27.0 1400.651 -892.492 36.0 1391.792 -897.702 36.0 1409.199 -885.437 36.0 1387.749 -892.701 36.0 1404.703 -897.488 36.0 1393.156 -886.17 36.0 1399.076 -892.749 36.0 1390.216 -897.957 36.0 1407.625 -885.695 36.0 1416.707 -891.745 36.0 1403.126 -897.745 36.0 1406.051 -885.953 36.0 1397.5 -893.005 36.0 1388.639 -898.212 36.0 1404.476 -886.211 36.0 1415.131 -892.005 36.0 1401.55 -898.002 36.0 1402.902 -886.468 36.0 1413.556 -892.264 36.0 1399.973 -898.259 36.0 1401.327 -886.725 36.0 1395.924 -893.261 37.0 1387.062 -898.467 36.0 1399.753 -886.982 36.0 1411.981 -892.523 38.0 1417.615 -897.254 36.0 1398.178 -887.239 36.0 1410.405 -892.782 38.0 1398.396 -898.516 36.0 1415.798 -886.237 37.0 1394.349 -893.517 38.0 1416.039 -897.514 36.0 1414.224 -886.496 36.0 1408.829 -893.04 36.0 1385.486 -898.721 36.0 1396.604 -887.495 27.0 1392.773 -893.773 36.0 1414.463 -897.773 36.0 1412.65 -886.755 27.0 1407.254 -893.299 36.0 1396.82 -898.772 36.0 1395.029 -887.751 27.0 1405.678 -893.557 36.0 1412.886 -898.033 36.0 1411.075 -887.014 27.0 1391.197 -894.028 36.0 1383.909 -898.975 36.0 1409.501 -887.273 30.0 1404.102 -893.814 36.0 1395.243 -899.028 36.0 1393.454 -888.007 34.0 1389.621 -894.283 36.0 1411.309 -898.291 36.0 1407.926 -887.531 36.0 1402.526 -894.072 36.0 1409.733 -898.55 36.0 1406.351 -887.789 36.0 1400.951 -894.329 36.0 1393.666 -899.284 36.0Okefenokee Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1382.332 -899.228 36.0 1387.952 -903.979 36.0 1400.19 -909.539 36.0 1408.156 -898.809 36.0 1418.524 -902.764 36.0 1419.433 -908.274 36.0 1406.579 -899.067 36.0 1399.293 -904.027 36.0 1417.854 -908.534 36.0 1392.09 -899.539 36.0 1386.374 -904.233 36.0 1398.611 -909.796 36.0 1405.003 -899.325 36.0 1416.947 -903.024 37.0 1416.276 -908.794 36.0 1390.513 -899.795 36.0 1397.715 -904.284 32.0 1414.697 -909.053 36.0 1403.426 -899.582 36.0 1415.369 -903.283 27.0 1397.032 -910.052 36.0 1388.936 -900.049 36.0 1413.792 -903.543 36.0 1413.119 -909.313 36.0 1401.849 -899.839 36.0 1384.796 -904.487 37.0 1411.54 -909.572 36.0 1400.272 -900.096 36.0 1412.214 -903.802 37.0 1409.962 -909.831 36.0 1387.359 -900.304 36.0 1410.636 -904.061 36.0 1408.383 -910.089 34.0 1417.918 -899.09 36.0 1383.219 -904.741 36.0 1406.804 -910.347 30.0 1398.695 -900.353 36.0 1409.059 -904.319 36.0 1405.225 -910.605 33.0 1416.342 -899.35 36.0 1407.481 -904.577 36.0 1403.646 -910.863 33.0 1385.782 -900.558 36.0 1381.641 -904.995 36.0 1402.067 -911.12 33.0 1414.765 -899.61 36.0 1405.903 -904.835 36.0 1400.488 -911.377 31.0 1397.118 -900.609 36.0 1404.326 -905.093 36.0 1419.736 -910.111 31.0 1413.188 -899.869 36.0 1380.063 -905.248 36.0 1418.157 -910.371 36.0 1384.205 -900.812 36.0 1389.826 -905.562 36.0 1398.909 -911.634 36.0 1395.541 -900.865 36.0 1402.748 -905.351 36.0 1416.578 -910.631 36.0 1411.611 -900.128 37.0 1401.17 -905.608 36.0 1414.999 -910.891 36.0 1410.034 -900.387 37.0 1388.248 -905.817 36.0 1397.33 -911.89 36.0 1393.964 -901.121 36.0 1399.592 -905.865 36.0 1413.42 -911.15 36.0 1382.628 -901.066 36.0 1418.827 -904.6 36.0 1395.751 -912.146 36.0 1408.457 -900.645 36.0 1386.67 -906.071 36.0 1411.842 -911.409 36.0 1406.88 -900.904 36.0 1417.249 -904.86 34.0 1410.262 -911.668 36.0 1392.387 -901.377 36.0 1398.014 -906.121 29.0 1394.172 -912.402 36.0 1381.051 -901.319 36.0 1415.671 -905.12 30.0 1408.683 -911.926 36.0 1405.303 -901.161 36.0 1414.094 -905.38 36.0 1407.104 -912.184 36.0 1390.81 -901.632 36.0 1385.092 -906.325 36.0 1392.593 -912.657 36.0 1403.726 -901.419 36.0 1412.516 -905.639 36.0 1405.525 -912.442 36.0 1389.233 -901.887 36.0 1410.938 -905.898 36.0 1403.946 -912.7 36.0 1402.149 -901.676 36.0 1383.514 -906.579 36.0 1402.367 -912.957 36.0 1400.571 -901.933 36.0 1409.36 -906.156 36.0 1400.787 -913.214 36.0 1387.655 -902.141 37.0 1407.782 -906.415 36.0 1399.208 -913.471 32.0 1418.221 -900.927 36.0 1381.936 -906.833 36.0 1416.881 -912.468 33.0 1398.994 -902.19 37.0 1406.204 -906.673 36.0 1415.301 -912.728 35.0 1416.644 -901.187 36.0 1380.358 -907.086 36.0 1397.629 -913.728 35.0 1386.078 -902.396 36.0 1404.625 -906.93 36.0 1413.722 -912.987 33.0 1415.067 -901.446 36.0 1390.123 -907.399 36.0 1396.049 -913.984 31.0 1397.417 -902.446 36.0 1403.047 -907.188 36.0 1412.143 -913.246 30.0 1413.49 -901.706 36.0 1401.469 -907.445 36.0 1410.563 -913.505 31.0 1384.501 -902.65 36.0 1388.545 -907.654 36.0 1394.47 -914.24 36.0 1395.839 -902.703 36.0 1399.891 -907.702 36.0 1408.984 -913.764 36.0 1411.913 -901.965 36.0 1419.13 -906.437 36.0 1392.89 -914.495 37.0 1410.335 -902.224 36.0 1417.552 -906.697 32.0 1407.405 -914.022 36.0 1394.262 -902.958 36.0 1398.312 -907.958 30.0 1405.825 -914.28 36.0 1382.923 -902.904 36.0 1415.974 -906.957 33.0 1404.246 -914.538 36.0 1408.758 -902.482 37.0 1414.396 -907.216 33.0 1402.666 -914.795 36.0 1392.684 -903.214 36.0 1396.734 -908.215 30.0 1401.086 -915.052 36.0 1407.181 -902.74 37.0 1412.817 -907.476 36.0 1399.507 -915.309 36.0 1381.346 -903.157 36.0 1411.239 -907.735 36.0 1417.183 -914.305 36.0 1405.603 -902.998 36.0 1409.661 -907.993 36.0 1415.603 -914.565 36.0 1404.026 -903.256 36.0 1408.082 -908.252 36.0 1397.927 -915.565 36.0 1379.768 -903.41 36.0 1406.504 -908.51 36.0 1414.024 -914.824 36.0 1389.529 -903.724 36.0 1404.925 -908.768 36.0 1396.347 -915.822 36.0 1402.448 -903.513 36.0 1403.347 -909.025 36.0 1412.444 -915.084 36.0 1400.871 -903.77 36.0 1401.768 -909.282 36.0 1410.864 -915.343 32.0Okefenokee Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1394.767 -916.078 36.0 1405.444 -921.888 36.0 1420.881 -926.907 37.0 1409.285 -915.601 36.0 1403.863 -922.146 36.0 1419.299 -927.168 36.0 1393.187 -916.333 36.0 1402.282 -922.403 36.0 1400.015 -928.432 36.0 1407.705 -915.859 33.0 1421.554 -921.134 36.0 1417.717 -927.428 36.0 1406.125 -916.117 31.0 1400.701 -922.66 36.0 1416.135 -927.688 36.0 1404.545 -916.375 32.0 1419.973 -921.394 36.0 1398.433 -928.688 36.0 1402.965 -916.633 36.0 1399.12 -922.917 36.0 1414.553 -927.947 36.0 1401.385 -916.89 36.0 1416.811 -921.915 36.0 1396.851 -928.945 36.0 1399.805 -917.147 36.0 1415.23 -922.174 36.0 1412.971 -928.206 36.0 1417.485 -916.142 36.0 1397.539 -923.174 36.0 1411.389 -928.465 36.0 1415.905 -916.402 36.0 1413.649 -922.434 36.0 1395.268 -929.201 36.0 1398.225 -917.403 36.0 1412.068 -922.693 36.0 1409.807 -928.724 36.0 1414.325 -916.662 36.0 1395.958 -923.43 36.0 1408.225 -928.983 36.0 1396.645 -917.66 36.0 1410.487 -922.952 36.0 1406.643 -929.241 37.0 1412.745 -916.921 36.0 1394.376 -923.686 36.0 1405.06 -929.498 37.0 1411.165 -917.18 36.0 1408.906 -923.21 36.0 1403.478 -929.756 37.0 1395.065 -917.916 36.0 1407.325 -923.468 36.0 1401.896 -930.013 37.0 1409.585 -917.439 36.0 1392.795 -923.941 36.0 1421.184 -928.745 37.0 1393.485 -918.171 36.0 1405.744 -923.726 36.0 1419.602 -929.005 37.0 1408.005 -917.697 36.0 1404.162 -923.984 36.0 1400.313 -930.27 37.0 1406.425 -917.955 36.0 1402.581 -924.241 36.0 1418.02 -929.266 37.0 1391.904 -918.427 36.0 1401 -924.499 36.0 1416.437 -929.525 37.0 1404.845 -918.213 36.0 1420.276 -923.232 36.0 1398.731 -930.527 37.0 1403.264 -918.47 36.0 1399.418 -924.755 36.0 1414.855 -929.785 37.0 1401.684 -918.728 36.0 1417.113 -923.752 36.0 1397.148 -930.783 37.0 1420.948 -917.459 33.0 1415.532 -924.012 36.0 1413.272 -930.044 37.0 1419.368 -917.72 29.0 1397.837 -925.012 41.0 1400.104 -918.985 36.0 1413.951 -924.271 37.0 1417.788 -917.98 36.0 1412.369 -924.531 36.0 1398.523 -919.241 36.0 1396.255 -925.268 36.0 1416.207 -918.24 36.0 1410.788 -924.79 36.0 1414.627 -918.499 36.0 1394.674 -925.524 36.0 1396.943 -919.497 36.0 1409.206 -925.048 36.0 1413.047 -918.759 36.0 1407.625 -925.306 36.0 1411.466 -919.018 36.0 1393.092 -925.78 36.0 1395.362 -919.754 36.0 1406.043 -925.564 36.0 1409.886 -919.276 36.0 1404.462 -925.822 36.0 1393.782 -920.009 36.0 1402.88 -926.08 36.0 1408.305 -919.535 36.0 1401.298 -926.337 36.0 1406.725 -919.793 36.0 1420.578 -925.069 36.0 1405.144 -920.051 36.0 1418.997 -925.33 36.0 1403.564 -920.308 36.0 1399.717 -926.594 36.0 1401.983 -920.565 36.0 1417.415 -925.59 36.0 1419.67 -919.557 36.0 1415.834 -925.85 36.0 1400.402 -920.822 37.0 1398.135 -926.85 36.0 1418.09 -919.817 35.0 1414.252 -926.109 36.0 1398.822 -921.079 30.0 1396.553 -927.106 36.0 1416.509 -920.077 36.0 1412.67 -926.368 36.0 1414.929 -920.337 36.0 1411.089 -926.627 36.0 1397.241 -921.336 36.0 1394.971 -927.362 36.0 1413.348 -920.596 36.0 1409.507 -926.886 36.0 1411.767 -920.855 36.0 1393.389 -927.618 36.0 1395.66 -921.592 36.0 1407.925 -927.144 36.0 1410.187 -921.114 36.0 1406.343 -927.402 36.0 1394.079 -921.847 36.0 1404.761 -927.66 36.0 1408.606 -921.372 36.0 1403.179 -927.918 36.0 1407.025 -921.631 36.0 1422.463 -926.646 36.0 1392.498 -922.103 36.0 1401.597 -928.175 37.0Wolf Island Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m) 1485.848 -828.138 1.0 1485.225 -829.19 1.0 1486.007 -829.054 1.0 1486.789 -828.918 3.0 1487.571 -828.781 2.0 1488.353 -828.645 1.0 1485.385 -830.106 1.0 1489.135 -828.509 1.0 1486.167 -829.97 1.0 1486.949 -829.834 1.0 1487.731 -829.697 1.0 1488.513 -829.561 1.0 1489.295 -829.424 1.0 1486.327 -830.886 1.0 1487.109 -830.749 1.0 1487.891 -830.613 1.0 1488.673 -830.476 1.0 1489.455 -830.34 1.0 1486.486 -831.801 1.0 1487.268 -831.665 1.0 1488.051 -831.529 1.0 1488.833 -831.392 1.0 1489.615 -831.256 1.0 1487.428 -832.581 1.0 1488.21 -832.444 1.0 1488.993 -832.308 1.0 1489.775 -832.171 1.0 1488.53 -834.276 1.0 1488.69 -835.192 1.0 1489.472 -835.055 1.0Cape Romain Class I Area Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m)

1609.918 -633.619 0 1610.682 -633.471 1 1610.506 -632.561 1 1611.27 -632.414 1 1611.094 -631.504 1 1611.858 -631.356 1 1610.154 -630.742 1 1610.918 -630.594 1 1611.682 -630.446 1 1612.446 -630.298 1 1610.742 -629.684 1 1611.506 -629.537 1 1612.27 -629.389 1 1610.566 -628.775 0 1611.33 -628.627 1 1612.093 -628.479 1 1612.857 -628.331 1 1610.39 -627.865 1 1611.154 -627.717 1 1610.214 -626.955 1 1610.978 -626.807 1 1611.741 -626.66 1 1610.802 -625.898 1 1611.565 -625.75 1 1610.626 -624.988 1 1611.389 -624.84 2 1612.152 -624.693 1 1615.968 -623.952 0 1611.213 -623.931 1 1611.976 -623.783 1 1616.554 -622.895 0 1611.037 -623.021 1

1611.8 -622.873 1 1612.387 -621.816 1 1613.149 -621.668 1 1617.727 -620.779 0 1612.973 -620.758 1 1613.736 -620.61 1 1621.949 -618.069 0 1622.712 -617.92 1 1623.474 -617.772 1Cape Romain Class I Area Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m)

1614.146 -618.643 1 1623.297 -616.862 1 1624.059 -616.713 1 1624.822 -616.564 1 1625.584 -616.415 1 1633.208 -614.921 1 1633.97 -614.771 0 1614.732 -617.586 1 1621.594 -616.25 0 1622.357 -616.102 1 1623.119 -615.953 1 1623.882 -615.804 1 1624.644 -615.655 1 1625.406 -615.506 1 1626.169 -615.357 1 1626.931 -615.208 1 1627.693 -615.059 1 1628.456 -614.909 2 1629.218 -614.76 2 1629.98 -614.611 1 1630.742 -614.461 2 1631.505 -614.311 1 1633.791 -613.862 0 1615.318 -616.528 1 1616.08 -616.38 1 1616.843 -616.232 1 1620.655 -615.49 0 1621.417 -615.341 1 1622.179 -615.192 1 1622.942 -615.044 1 1623.704 -614.895 1 1624.466 -614.746 1 1625.229 -614.597 1 1628.278 -614 1 1629.04 -613.851 1 1632.088 -613.253 1 1634.375 -612.803 0 1619.715 -614.729 0 1620.477 -614.581 1 1621.24 -614.432 1 1622.002 -614.283 1Cape Romain Class I Area Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m)

1622.764 -614.134 1 1623.526 -613.986 1 1624.289 -613.837 1 1625.051 -613.688 1 1625.813 -613.539 1 1626.575 -613.389 1 1627.337 -613.24 1 1629.624 -612.792 1 1630.386 -612.643 1 1631.148 -612.493 1 1631.91 -612.344 1 1634.196 -611.894 0 1618.776 -613.968 1 1619.538 -613.82 1

1620.3 -613.671 1 1621.062 -613.523 1 1621.824 -613.374 1 1622.587 -613.225 1 1623.349 -613.076 1 1624.111 -612.927 1 1624.873 -612.778 1 1625.635 -612.629 1 1626.397 -612.48 1 1627.159 -612.331 1 1627.921 -612.182 1 1628.683 -612.033 1 1629.445 -611.883 1 1630.207 -611.734 1 1630.969 -611.584 1 1634.017 -610.985 0 1620.123 -612.762 1 1620.885 -612.613 1 1621.647 -612.465 1 1622.409 -612.316 1 1623.171 -612.167 1 1623.933 -612.018 1 1624.695 -611.869 1 1625.457 -611.72 1 1626.219 -611.571 1 1626.981 -611.422 1 1627.743 -611.273 1Cape Romain Class I Area

Lambert Conformal X (km) Lambert Conformal Y (km) Height (m)

1628.505 -611.123 1 1633.077 -610.226 0 1633.839 -610.076 1

1634.6 -609.927 1 1621.47 -611.555 1 1622.232 -611.407 1 1622.994 -611.258 1 1623.756 -611.109 1 1624.517 -610.96 1 1625.279 -610.811 1 1626.041 -610.662 1 1626.803 -610.513 1 1627.565 -610.364 1 1628.327 -610.214 1 1629.089 -610.065 1 1629.851 -609.916 1 1630.613 -609.766 1 1634.422 -609.018 0 1624.34 -610.051 1 1625.102 -609.902 1 1625.863 -609.753 1 1626.625 -609.604 1 1627.387 -609.455 1 1628.149 -609.305 1 1628.911 -609.156 1 1629.672 -609.007 1 1630.434 -608.857 1 1634.243 -608.109 0 1628.732 -608.247 1 1629.494 -608.098 1 1630.256 -607.948 1 1631.017 -607.799 1 1629.316 -607.189 1 1630.077 -607.039 1 1630.839 -606.89 1 1631.601 -606.74 1 1629.899 -606.13 1 1630.66 -605.981 1 1631.422 -605.831 1 1629.721 -605.221 1 1630.482 -605.072 1Joyce Kilmer Slickrock Lambert

Confor mal X (km) Lambert Conforma

l Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conforma

l X (km) Lambert Conforma

l Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conformal

X (km) Lambert Conforma

l Y (km) Height (m)

1174.116 -429.607 1154 1168.724 -423.854 1065 1174.861 -429.499 1056 1169.468 -423.747 836 1175.607 -429.391 903 1170.213 -423.64 700 1176.352 -429.283 820 1170.958 -423.532 782 1177.097 -429.175 818 1171.703 -423.425 961 1173.239 -428.8 1278 1173.937 -423.102 809 1173.984 -428.693 1069 1174.682 -422.995 941 1174.729 -428.585 913 1167.847 -423.047 991 1175.475 -428.477 776 1168.592 -422.94 817 1176.22 -428.369 788 1169.337 -422.833 751 1176.965 -428.262 750 1170.081 -422.726 635 1172.362 -427.994 1327 1170.826 -422.619 772 1173.107 -427.887 1085 1171.571 -422.511 882 1173.852 -427.779 985 1168.461 -422.026 954 1174.597 -427.671 934 1169.205 -421.919 739 1175.342 -427.563 978 1169.95 -421.812 620 1176.088 -427.456 982 1170.694 -421.705 635 1176.833 -427.348 824 1171.439 -421.597 700 1169.995 -427.402 1317 1172.184 -421.49 865 1170.74 -427.295 1394 1168.329 -421.113 943 1171.485 -427.188 1487 1169.074 -421.005 742 1172.23 -427.08 1308 1169.818 -420.898 505 1172.975 -426.973 1237 1170.563 -420.791 558 1173.72 -426.865 1336 1171.307 -420.684 538 1174.465 -426.757 1290 1172.052 -420.576 686 1175.21 -426.65 1304 1168.198 -420.199 946 1175.955 -426.542 1111 1168.942 -420.092 760

1176.7 -426.434 1066 1169.686 -419.984 644 1169.863 -426.489 1189 1170.431 -419.877 491 1170.608 -426.381 1127 1171.175 -419.77 442 1171.353 -426.274 1299 1171.92 -419.662 491 1172.098 -426.166 1380 1168.066 -419.285 959 1172.843 -426.059 1553 1168.81 -419.178 752 1173.588 -425.951 1336 1169.555 -419.071 528 1174.333 -425.844 1219 1170.299 -418.963 598 1175.078 -425.736 1109 1171.043 -418.856 515 1175.823 -425.628 1133 1171.788 -418.749 400 1176.568 -425.52 1226 1172.532 -418.641 523 1168.987 -425.682 1280 1167.935 -418.371 712 1169.731 -425.575 1136 1170.167 -418.05 743 1170.476 -425.467 906 1170.912 -417.942 684 1171.221 -425.36 999 1171.656 -417.835 538 1171.966 -425.253 1170 1172.4 -417.727 361 1172.711 -425.145 1376 1173.456 -425.037 1318 1174.201 -424.93 1369 1174.946 -424.822 1152 1175.691 -424.714 924 1176.436 -424.607 882 1168.11 -424.875 1151 1168.855 -424.768 1116

1169.6 -424.661 1044 1170.345 -424.554 772 1171.09 -424.446 866 1171.834 -424.339 1090 1173.324 -424.124 1020 1174.069 -424.016 1067 1167.979 -423.961 1224Linville Gorge Lambert Conforma

l X (km) Lambert Conforma

l Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conforma

l X (km) Lambert Conformal

Y (km) Height (m) Lambert Conforma

l X (km) Lambert Conforma

l Y (km) Height (m)

1349.498 -350.859 468 1346.472 -337.331 924 1350.236 -350.735 457 1347.209 -337.207 901 1349.345 -349.949 478 1347.946 -337.084 1114 1350.083 -349.825 576 1348.683 -336.96 1219 1347.717 -349.286 550 1345.583 -336.544 946 1348.455 -349.162 472 1346.32 -336.421 983 1349.193 -349.039 721 1347.056 -336.297 1142 1349.931 -348.915 759 1346.167 -335.511 1063 1350.669 -348.791 600 1351.406 -348.667 517 1347.564 -348.376 641 1348.302 -348.252 439 1349.04 -348.129 607 1349.778 -348.005 881 1350.516 -347.881 758 1347.412 -347.466 920 1348.15 -347.342 665 1348.887 -347.219 458 1349.625 -347.095 585 1350.363 -346.971 870 1347.997 -346.432 826 1348.735 -346.308 518 1349.473 -346.185 525 1350.21 -346.061 695 1350.948 -345.937 892 1347.845 -345.522 874 1348.582 -345.398 581 1349.32 -345.275 573 1350.057 -345.151 664 1348.43 -344.488 728 1349.167 -344.364 694 1349.905 -344.241 914 1348.277 -343.578 756 1349.015 -343.454 631 1349.752 -343.331 944 1348.125 -342.668 826 1348.862 -342.544 624 1349.599 -342.42 965 1347.972 -341.758 732 1348.709 -341.634 685 1349.446 -341.51 889 1347.819 -340.848 890 1348.557 -340.724 697 1349.294 -340.6 827 1346.93 -340.061 1096 1347.667 -339.938 749 1348.404 -339.814 816 1349.141 -339.69 1106 1346.777 -339.151 1055 1347.514 -339.027 762 1348.251 -338.904 909 1348.988 -338.78 1092 1345.888 -338.364 941 1346.625 -338.241 813 1347.362 -338.117 953 1348.099 -337.994 1097 1348.835 -337.87 1083 1345.735 -337.454 923