alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
: About the District 

: Business & Finance : Employment : Governing Board : Permits : Publications & Data 

- General Publications - Technical Publications - Hydrologic Data - GIS Data 

: Recreation : Contact Us : Home Page 

MONTHLY TEMPERATURE SUMMARIES

(Degrees Fahrenheit) 

MONTHLY TEMPERATURE SUMMARIES 

(Degrees Fahrenheit) 

PENSACOLA CRESTVIEW 

Monthly 

Averages 

Daily 

Extremes 

Monthly 

Averages 

Daily 

Extremes 

A

MONTH PERIOD Max. Min. Mean High Low Max. Min. Mean High Low M

January 1961-90 59.7 41.4 50.8 80 5 58.9 34.8 47.1 81 8 6February 1961-90 63.1 44.3 54.0 82 19 64.3 40.1 52.4 83 20 6March 1961-90 69.4 51.4 60.6 85 22 72.0 47.0 59.7 87 18 7April 1961-90 76.4 58.1 67.5 96 33 79.4 52.1 66.0 91 33 7May 1961-90 83.2 65.7 74.7 96 48 84.7 59.9 72.5 97 40 8June 1961-90 88.7 71.9 80.5 101 56 90.7 67.5 79.3 101 53 8July 1961-90 89.9 74.2 82.3 106 61 92 71.1 81.8 105 63 9August 1961-90 89.2 73.8 81.7 104 63 92.1 70.3 81.4 101 59 9September 1961-90 86.4 70.3 78.6 98 43 88.3 66.2 77.5 98 42 8October 1961-90 79.2 59.6 69.7 92 34 79.7 53.2 66.7 92 29 November 1961-90 70.1 51.0 60.8 85 25 71.3 45.4 58.6 87 22 7December 1961-90 62.9 44.4 53.9 81 11 63 38.7 51.1 82 9 6

APALACHICOLA PANAMA CITY 

Monthly 

Averages 

Daily 

Extremes 

Monthly 

Averages 

Daily 

Extremes 

M

A

MONTH PERIOD Max. Min. Mean High Low Max. Min. Mean High Low MJanuary 1961-90 60.5 43.9 52.4 78 9 62.6 39.4 51.2 80 6 6February 1961-90 62.9 46.1 54.8 79 24 65.2 41.7 53.7 82 23 6March 1961-90 68.6 52.6 60.9 85 22 71.7 48.8 60.5 87 27 7April 1961-90 75.6 59.2 67.7 90 36 77.5 54.3 66.1 93 34 8May 1961-90 82.1 66.0 74.3 98 47 83.9 61.9 73.1 96 45 8June 1961-90 87.3 72.2 80.0 98 48 89.1 69.1 79.3 100 46 9

Monthly Temperature Summaries 

http://www.nwfwmd.state.fl.us/rmd/temps/mthtemps.htm 
July 1961-90 88.5 74.3 81.7 98 63 90.3 71.9 81.3 101 60 9

August 1961-90 88.5 74.2 81.6 99 62 90.3 71.6 81.2 99 63 9September 1961-90 85.9 71.4 78.9 95 50 88.2 68.0 78.3 98 45 8October 1961-90 78.9 61.4 70.4 91 37 80.8 56.0 68.7 93 33 8November 1961-90 70.7 53.1 62.1 85 27 73.1 49.1 61.4 91 28 7December 1961-90 63.9 46.8 55.6 81 13 65.2 41.4 53.6 82 11 6

Monthly Temperature Summaries 

http://www.nwfwmd.state.fl.us/rmd/temps/mthtemps.htm
#### Ex parte K. BRADFORD.

No. 37281.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 18, 1964.

No attorney for relator in this Court.

J. Albert Pruett, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Angleton, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

This is an application for writ of habeas corpus certified to this court by Honorable T. M. Gupton, Judge of the 23rd District Court of Brazoria County, together with certain facts ascertained at a hearing.

We shall treat the proceedings as an original application to this court, in view of Judge Gupton’s action in refusing to grant the writ of habeas corpus.

It has now been made known to this court that relator is no longer confined, and the question raised by his application has become moot. Ex parte Brown, 374 S.W. 2d 895.

The application for writ of habeas corpus is ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350
CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Annual Report of National Home Health Care Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven
Fialkow, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that,
to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

October 30, 2006

| | /s/
Steven Fialkow 
Steven Fialkow
Principal Executive Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to National Home Health
Care Corp. and will be retained by National Home Health Care Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  amended  Annual  Report  of Imaging Technologies
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A2 for the year ending June 30, 2002 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Brian  Bonar,  Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.   1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.

/s/  Brian  Bonar.
------------------

Brian  Bonar
Chief  Executive  Officer

<PAGE>

Date:  July  1,  2003

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  amended  Annual  Report  of Imaging Technologies
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A2 for the year ending June 30, 2002 as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  James  R.  Downey, Jr., Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   1350,  as  adopted  pursuant to  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result  of operations of the Company.

/s/  James  R.  Downey,  Jr
----------------------------

James  R.  Downey,  Jr.
Chief  Accounting  Officer

Date:  July  1,  2003
#### Richard HILL et ux., Appellants, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 6881.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

April 12, 1956.

*802Fulton, Hancock & McClain, Hollie G. McClain, Gilmer, for appellants.

J. O. Duncan, County Atty., Gilmer, for appellee.

DAVIS, Justice.

This is a condemnation suit by the State of Texas, Condemner, against Richard Hill et ux., Condemnees. *Condemnees*perfected an appeal from the award of the special Commissioners and trial was had in the County Court of Upshur County before a jury. Judgment was rendered for a lesser sum than condemnees contended was the value of the land sought to be condemned, plus the damages to the remaining portion thereof, and condemnees have appealed.

Appellant-condemnees bring forth two points of error. By point 1 they complain of the action of the trial court in permitting one of the special Commissioners to testify, over timely objection, that the special Commission assessed the damages to appellants’ property at a certain sum. This was error. Giersa v. Denison & P. S. Ry. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 45 S.W. 925; Crystal City & U. R. Co. v. Boothe, Tex.Civ.App., 126 S.W. 700; City of Denton v. Chastain, Tex.Civ.App., 156 S.W.2d 554; Lower Colorado River Authority v. Burton, Tex.Civ.App., 170 S.W.2d 783; Hatchett v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 211 S.W.2d 771. The point is sustained.

By point 2, appellants complain of the action of the trial court in permitting the testimony of the State’s witness, over timely objection, that the State would not exercise, or there is no present intention of exercising, to the full extent, the rights acquired by the condemnation. This, too, was error. Perkins v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 150 S.W.2d 157; 29 C.J.S., Eminent Domain, § 155, p. 1015.

There are numerous other authorities in support of each point.

For the errors pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded.'
Consent of Deloitte & Touche Espana, S.L.



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT 
  
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-13552, No. 333-07182, No. 333-06986 and No.
333-54232 on Form F-3 of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. of our report dated February 3, 2004 except for the Note 32 as to which the date is June 29, 2004, appearing in this Annual report on Form 20-F of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (the
“Bank”) for the year ended December 31, 2003. 
  
 /s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE ESPAÑA, S.L. 
  
 DELOITTE & TOUCHE ESPAÑA, S.L. 
  
  
 Madrid, Spain 
 June 29, 2004
#### Robert Lee YOUNG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29020.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURÍAM.

Forgery is the offense, with punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Comments in Response to 

''Final rule; request for comments" 

Docket: FAA-2014-0336 Directorate Identifier 2013-SW-063-AD 

Comments have been received in response to: "Final rule; request for comments," 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted 

Once you have made your determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional iriformation following the appropriate response, 

if necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal. 

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

.::(Ltt/e f?.,cJ..o.ro) 1 Tro.hs[M\c,dq 

(Please check one) 

~hese comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD. 

D These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

F AA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.) 

Akrldd/-

Name: 

!2/7/!f ~I 

Date: 

(This form is part of the official docket file for this AD action.) 

Rev 0 (9/08)
exv4w3



 





EXHIBIT 4.3




Amendment No. 2 to Assisted Living Concepts, Inc. 2002 Incentive Award Plan



Effective as of June 15, 2004, the Compensation Committee amended Section 4.5
of the Assisted Living Concepts, Inc. 2002 Incentive Award Plan to add the
following provision to the end of Section 4.5:




	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	          In addition, the Administrator may, during the term of the
Plan, grant to Independent Directors who serve on committees of
the Board of Directors, Options (which options shall be
non-qualified stock options) to purchase shares of the Company’s
stock to provide compensation to Independent Directors for serving
as a member of a committee of the Board of Directors. Such
Options shall have such terms and conditions, including term,
exercise price and vesting as the Administrator shall determine in
its discretion consistent with applicable law and such Options may
be granted at less than Fair Market Value.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HUAYU YAN, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 11-72623 Agency No. A095-179-336
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted February 3, 2015 ** Pasadena, California Before: D.W. NELSON, BYBEE, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. Huayu Yan petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and deny the petition for review. 

# FILED
FEB 05 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).The BIA did not err in holding that Yan did not meet her burden of providing evidence establishing a material change in circumstances in her native China. Substantial evidence supports th e BIA’s determination that the evidence presented by Yan in her motion to reope n was not qualitatively different from the evidence presented in her initial asylum petition. See Najmabadi v. Holder , 597 F.3d 983, 987–91 (9th Cir. 2010); cf. Malty v. Ashcroft , 381 F.3d 942, 945–46 (9th Cir. 2004). Because Yan failed to show changed country conditions, her motion to reopen does not qualify for an exception from time and number limits. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i)–(ii); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2)–(3). Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Yan’s motion to reopen. PETITION DENIED
.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey H. Buchalter, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.

|              |  |                                                                                                                          |  | 
|------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|March 6, 2009 |  | /s/ Jeffrey H. BuchalterJeffrey H. BuchalterChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
#### Margarita Carrizales TORRES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27781.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 9, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., Charles S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon

B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is arson; the punishment, 20 years.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills ■ of exception. . All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is.affirmed.
<PAGE>





                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                            PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                                   PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with
     Catuity, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the "Report")
     for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14b or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
     Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

     Michael V. Howe, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and John H.
     Lowry, the Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, each certifies that, to
     the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.




     Date: 08/08/03
                                           /s/ Michael V. Howe
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Michael V. Howe
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ John H. Lowry
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John H. Lowry
                                           Chief Financial Officer



     Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
     has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
     furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
     request.




                                       16
#### Harlan BROWN, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 11, 1957.

*923L. C. Lawrence, Jamestown, Ralph Hurt, Columbia, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from conviction of selling whiskey in local option territory with a penalty of sixty days confinement in jail and a fine of $100.

The contention that the special judge was not authorized to conduct the trial because the circuit court clerk had not certified the disqualification of the regular judge to the Chief Justice of this court is not sustained 'by the record. We have the certification by the regular judge, attested by the circuit clerk, that the judge had disqualified himself in this and three other cases of the Commonwealth v. Harlan Brown, one case against Clyde Thomas and another against Edgar Rexroat.

No error appearing in the course of the trial, the motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment stands affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

s0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

137875 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137875 

 COA: 287338 

Ingham CC: 07-000813-FH 

SHERRY JEAN DIGGS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 12, 2008 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in 

People v Idziak, 484 Mich 549 (2009). 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v Idziak, 484 

Mich 549 (2009).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Center for Inherited Disease Research (CIDR).                    

*Date:*                         March 7, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rudy O. Pozzatti, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 6908, Rockville, MD 20892, (301) 402-8739,                         *pozzattr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 15, 2024.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-03520 Filed 2-20-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Annual Report of National Home Health Care Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
P. Heller, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

October 27, 2005

                                                  /s/ Robert P. Heller
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Robert P. Heller
                                                  Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement  required by 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350
has been  provided  to National  Home Health Care Corp.  and will be retained by
National  Home Health Care Corp.  and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.