alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      23.1**





*CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM*





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No. 333-143957 )
      on Form
      S-3 and (No. 333-141591 )
      on Form
      S-8 of Capital Gold Corporation of our report dated October 28, 2008 relating
      to
      our audit of the consolidated financial statements of Capital Gold Corporation
      and Subsidiaries, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Capital
      Gold Corporation for the year ended July 31, 2008.





WOLINETZ,
      LAFAZAN & COMPANY, P.C.





Rockville
      Centre, New York


October
      29, 2008
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Communication Intelligence Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis V. Dane, Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:           March 31, 2010





By: /s/ Francis V. Dane


Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at November 30, 1996 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the twelve months ended November 30,
1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,059
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,476
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             33,145
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                           19,035
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                             40,326
<PP&E>                                             283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,704
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,299
<PAYABLES>                                       8,595
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    52,200
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                             10,085
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              17,866
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,165
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,692
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,704
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                  937
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            10,465
<COMMISSIONS>                                      298
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                      779
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,121
<COMPENSATION>                                   1,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    309
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         189
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Johnnie MOSLEY, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28448.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1956.

No attorney for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady and Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Felony theft is the offense; the punishment, three years in the. penitentiary.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed, and no motion for rehearing will be entertained in this case.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6327

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL BRISTOL HARRINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior

District Judge. (1:02-cr-72-1; 1:05-cv-00014-WLO)

Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 26, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Bristol Harrington, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett

Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Bristol Harrington seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harrington has

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, furnished herewith.

Armstrong Holdings, Inc.

(the Company)

Written Statement by Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that
the Companys Form 10-Q periodic report containing its financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of that date.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ F. Nicholas Grasberger III                   
|F. Nicholas Grasberger III                       
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc.                         

Dated: October 22, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gifford
A. Dieterle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                                /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Gifford A. Dieterle
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                November 12, 2003


                                       1
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 (No. 333-128227) previously filed by SpectraScience, Inc. of our report
dated March 27, 2008 with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of SpectraScience, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and for the year then
ended, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.





/s/ J.H.
Cohn LLP





San
Diego, California


March 30,
2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2306

ANTHONY MCNAIR, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

N.C. GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (4:13-cv-00155-F) 

Submitted: January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Anthony Lee McNair, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Anthony Lee McNair appeals the district court’s order 

adopting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) 

(2012) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be 

granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. McNair v. N.C. Gen. Assembly, No. 

4:13-cv-00155-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Order entered September 10, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00307-CV

THIEN AN VO, Appellant

V.

HARRIS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COURT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-72816

ORDER

Although ordered to file by August 31, 2021 a supplemental reporter’s 

record of the proceeding held May 10, 2021, court reporter Darlene Stein has failed 

to do so. Accordingly, we again ORDER Ms. Stein to file the supplemental 

record. Should a record of the May 10th proceeding not exist, Ms. Stein shall state 

so in writing. The supplemental record or written verification shall be filed no 

later than September 27, 2021.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Stein 

and the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
From: Fisher, Brian To: "aaron_L_szabo@omb.eop.gov" Cc: Mark, Jeremy ; Risley, David Subject: EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 NPRM FRN 20151106 Date: Friday, November 06, 2015 12:05:00 PM Attachments: EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20151106 Preamble (redline).docx EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20151106 REG TEXT (redline).docx EO12866_2008 O3 NAAQS CSAPR Update 2060 AS05 NPRM FRN_20151106 RIA (redline).docx

Hi Aaron,

Please find attached redline strikeout versions of the preamble, RIA, and reg text. These incorporate our responses to the comments you have shared to date and that we have discussed.

Per your request, the preamble redline shows changes made since last Friday’s version (including the new language added on wildfires).

Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions.

Brian Fisher Policy Analyst Clean Air Markets Division (202) 343-9633
EXHIBIT
31.1
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
   I, Guido
DiGregorio, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Communication Intelligence
Corporation;
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;
  (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
  5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
  (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
March 12, 2008
  /s/
Guido DiGregorio
 Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer
---

**Exhibit 32.1**

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                           
|----------------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002       

The undersigned, Gerald Lau, President and Chief
  Executive Officer, and Edwin Chan, Chief Financial Officer, of Biopack Environmental
  Solutions Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A
        of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc. for the quarterly period ended
        March 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | the information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc.                                                                                 

Date: September 17, 2007

|/s/
      Gerald Lau                                                 | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Gerald Lau                                                           | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer                                | 
|(Principal Executive Officer)                                        | 
|                                                                     | 
|/s/
      Edwin Chan                                                 | 
|Edwin Chan                                                           | 
|Chief Financial Officer                                              | 
|(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer) | 

A signed original of this written statement required
  by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
  adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
  of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Biopack
  Environmental Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Biopack Environmental Solutions
  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1590 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1590

  To provide for the disposition of the Space Shuttle Discovery upon 
                              retirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2011

   Ms. Jackson Lee of Texas (for herself, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. 
Gonzalez, Mr. Doggett, and Mr. Chaffetz) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the disposition of the Space Shuttle Discovery upon 
                              retirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPACE SHUTTLE DISCOVERY.

    The Space Shuttle Discovery shall be placed on display at the Space 
Center Houston in Houston, Texas, for a period of 15 years after 
retirement of the shuttle from service, after which time it shall be 
returned to Washington, DC.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,705-01

EX PARTE DANIEL MARTEZ JOHNSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 54,384-B IN THE 181st DISTRICT COURT

FROM POTTER COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of

aggravated sexual assault of a child and two counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to

fifty years’ imprisonment in the aggravated sexual assault of a child count and twenty years’

imprisonment in each of the indecency with a child counts. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. 
2

The record before us reflects that a notice of appeal was not timely filed due to a

miscommunication between trial and appellate counsel. We find that Applicant is entitled to the

opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 54,384-B from

the 181st District Court of Potter County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may

give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: September 28, 2016

Do not publish
#### Edward BROWDER, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27991.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1956.

Byron Chappell, William C. Clark, Lubbock, for appellant.

Travis D. Shelton, Dist. Atty., James F. Moore, Asst. Dist. Atty., Lubbock, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. : ■ .

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for the felony offense of swindling by a worthless check, under art. 567b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., with punishment assessed at three years in the penitentiary and a fine of $1.00.

The record shows that the verdict of the jury was returned and the judgment entered thereon on July 19, 1955. It further shows that the sentence herein was pronounced upon the appellant on July 18, 1955. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled on July 28, 1955, at which time he gave notice of appeal.

Under the record, the sentence was pronounced upon the appellant one day prior to the return of the jury’s verdict and the entry of the judgment.

A sentence is the order of the court entered of record pronouncing the judgment and ordering it carried into execution as prescribed by law. Art. 767, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P. Without a judgment, the court is not authorized to pronounce sentence. 12 Tex.Jur. 717, Sec. 355; Horn v. State, 117 Tex.Cr.R. 22, 35 S.W.2d 145.

Therefore, no legal sentence appearing in the record, it is the duty of this court to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.