alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Capital
Gold Corporation (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Colin P. Sutherland, President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Colin SutherlandColin
      SutherlandPresidentNovember
      23, 2010
TS- CCGL81

Attachment #4

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 1d

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance s at Industrial Sites

Controlled by the SubmitterTS

- CCGL81 Attachment #4

**Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical**

**Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the**  **Submitter**

**– Re** 

**- packaging** TS

- CCGL81 Attachment #4

**Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical**

**Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by the**  **Submitter**

**– Formulation to Produce Flowback Aid Products**
#### Fred Lee ROGERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28048.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1956.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty,, Austin, for the State.

*631PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 1 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 2 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 3 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 4 not include the filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6
VILLAGE OF RUIDOSO , 7 Plaintiff-Appellee, 8
v. NO. 30,765 9 LOGAN GARRISON , 10 Defendant-Appellant. 11 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LINCOLN COUNTY 12 James Waylon Counts, District Judge 13 Bryant, Schneider-Cook Law Firm 14 Daniel A. Bryant 15 Ruidoso, NM 16 for Appellee 17 Logan Garrison 18 Ruidoso, NM 19 Pro Se Appellant 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 VIGIL, Judge. 22 Appellant Logan Garrison (Defendant) appeals from the district court’s ruling 23 that affirms his municipal court conviction for violation of the ordinance requiring that 242 he have a driver’s license. Our notice proposed to affirm. While this Court granted 1 Defendant’s request for an extension of time to file a memorandum in opposition, 2 Defendant never filed a memorandum in opposition. For reasons set forth in our 3 notice, we affirm. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED
. 5

_______________________________ 6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

_________________________________ 9 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge 10

_________________________________ 11 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 12
EXHIBIT 21.1

                       SAFEGUARD HEALTH ENTERPRISES, INC.

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



The  subsidiaries of SafeGuard Health Enterprises, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
are  as  follows:


1.   SafeGuard  Health  Plans,  Inc.,  a  California  corporation
2.   Guards Dental, Inc., a California corporation (A wholly owned subsidiary of
     SafeGuard  Health  Plans,  Inc.,  a  California  corporation)
3.   SafeGuard  Health  Plans,  Inc.,  a  Colorado  corporation
4.   SafeGuard  Health  Plans,  Inc.,  a  Florida  corporation
5.   SafeGuard  Health  Plans,  Inc.  an  Illinois  Corporation
6.   SafeGuard  Health  Plans,  Inc.,  a  Nevada  corporation
7.   SafeGuard  Health  Plans,  Inc.,  a  Texas  corporation
8.   SafeHealth  Life  Insurance  Company,  a  California  corporation
9.   SafeGuard  Dental  Services, Inc.,  a  Delaware  Corporation


<PAGE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1558 

To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to clarify the jurisdiction of 

the Environmental Protection Agency with respect to certain sporting 

good articles, and to exempt those articles from a definition under that 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2011 

Mr. MILLER of Florida (for himself, Mr. ROSS of Arkansas, Mr. LATTA, Mr. 

SHULER, Mr. BONNER, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. 

CARTER, Mr. COFFMAN of Colorado, Mr. COLE, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. 

DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas, Mr. 

HUNTER, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. KLINE, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. 

NUGENT, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. ROSS of Florida, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. POSEY, Mr. 

SIMPSON, Mr. ROGERS of Alabama, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. YODER, Mrs. 

MILLER of Michigan, Mr. LONG, Mr. CRAWFORD, and Mr. DUNCAN of 

South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Toxic Substances Control Act to clarify the 

jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency with 

respect to certain sporting good articles, and to exempt 

those articles from a definition under that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1558 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hunting, Fishing, and 

3 Recreational Shooting Protection Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF DEFINITION. 

5 Section 3(2)(B) of the Toxic Substances Control Act 

6 (15 U.S.C. 2602(2)(B)) is amended— 

7 (1) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘, and’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘, or any component of any such article includ9 ing, without limitation, shot, bullets and other pro10 jectiles, propellants, and primers,’’; 

11 (2) in clause (vi) by striking the period at the 

12 end and inserting ‘‘, and’’; and 

13 (3) by inserting after clause (vi) the following: 

14 ‘‘(vii) any sport fishing equipment (as such 

15 term is defined in subparagraph (a) of section 4162 

16 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) the sale of 

17 which is subject to the tax imposed by section 

18 4161(a) of such Code (determined without regard to 

19 any exemptions from such tax as provided by section 

20 4162 or 4221 or any other provision of such Code), 

21 and sport fishing equipment components.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**@ROAD, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of @Road, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Martini, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

August 9, 2005

 
| /s/ Michael  Martini     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Michael  Martini         |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
-NMREGULATORY EVAI1UATJON

Directorate Identifier: 2010 11~__ -AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial nwnber of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where avi tion might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. United Taconite, LLC Forbes, Minnesota

TABLE 6

SULFUR DIOXIDE REMOVAL EFFICIENCY DETERMINATION Line 2 Waste Gas Stacks Sulfur Mass Balance Determination Barr Engineering Co. January28,2010

II-'arameter i waste Gas**~tack** 2A : Waste Gas**~tack** 2tj I Test Date ! 12/10/2009 I 12/8/2009 I Test Period i 1102-1509 I 1043-1055 I I * Fuel Consumption Rate, TPH ! 10.82 

### i 9.12 i ** Fuel Moisture Content I 1.3 1.21 * Greenball Feed Rate, L TPH 600 587 ** Greenball Moisture Content, 

### % 9.56 9.63 Taconite Production Rate, L TPH 527 512 ** Fuel Sulfur Content, 

### % dry 3.61 I 3.67 ***Greenball Sulfur Content, 

### % dry 0.005 0.005 ***Taconite SulfurContent, 

### % dry 0.003 0.002
I Total Sulfur input, Ib/hr (1) 832 722 Sulfur Outputwith Fired Pellets, Ib/hr (2) 34 28 Sulfur Loading to Scrubbers, Ib/hr (3) 798 I 694 i i Sulfur Dioxide Loading to Scrubbers, Ib/hr (4) I 1595 I 1388 i i Average Sulfur Dioxide Loading Rate to Scrubbers, Ib/hn 1492 I Sulfur Dioxide Emission Rate from Scrubbers, Ib/hr (5) I 1081 Sulfur Dioxide Removal EffiCiency, 

### % , 27.5 t I**~** 

### t-rom I-'rocess uata ** Laboratory data from TPT *** Laboratory Results. ASTM Method 1915-07a (average ofTPTand Lerch Bros Results)

(1) Sulfur Input, Ib/hr

### =[(Greenball Feedrate to Kiln,LTPH x 2240 Ib/LT) x (1-Greenball Moisture Content, %/100) x (Greenball SulfurContent, %/100)] 

### + [(Fuel consumption Rate, TPH x 2000 Ib/ton) x (1-Fuel Moisture Content, %/100) x (Fuel SulfurContent)

(2) SulfurOutputwith Fired Pellets 

### = (Fired Pellet Production Rate, L TPH x 2240 Ib/LT) x ( Fired Pellet SulfurContent, %/100)

(3) Sulfur Loading Rates to Scrubbers

# =(Sulfur Input

- Sulfur Outputwith Fired Pellets)

(4) S02 Loading Rate to Scrubbers

# =Sulfur Loading Rate, Ib/hrx Ib mol/32 Ib sulfurx 64 Ib S02/lb mol

(5) As Determined from EPA Method 6C StackTests (combined average emissions from both stacks)
# Az Európai Unió C 340/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 340 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 59. évfolyam2016. szeptember 16. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 340

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

59. évfolyam2016. szeptember 16.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Tájékoztatások |
| | AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK |
| | Európai ParlamentTanács |
| 2016/C 340/01 | A Bizottságnak az Atlanti-óceán keleti részén és a Földközi-tengerben élő kékúszójútonhal-állományra vonatkozó többéves helyreállítási tervről, valamint a 302/2009/EK tanácsi rendelet hatályon kívül helyezéséről szóló, 2016. szeptember 14-i (EU) 2016/1627 rendelethez kapcsolódó nyilatkozata | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

IV   Tájékoztatások

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

Európai ParlamentTanács

2016/C 340/01

A Bizottságnak az Atlanti-óceán keleti részén és a Földközi-tengerben élő kékúszójútonhal-állományra vonatkozó többéves helyreállítási tervről, valamint a 302/2009/EK tanácsi rendelet hatályon kívül helyezéséről szóló, 2016. szeptember 14-i (EU) 2016/1627 rendelethez kapcsolódó nyilatkozata

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

IV Tájékoztatások

AZ EURÓPAI UNIÓ INTÉZMÉNYEITŐL, SZERVEITŐL, HIVATALAITÓL ÉS ÜGYNÖKSÉGEITŐL SZÁRMAZÓ TÁJÉKOZTATÁSOK

Európai Parlament Tanács

| 16.9.2016 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2016

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

C 340/1

---

A Bizottságnak az Atlanti-óceán keleti részén és a Földközi-tengerben élő kékúszójútonhal-állományra vonatkozó többéves helyreállítási tervről, valamint a 302/2009/EK tanácsi rendelet (1) hatályon kívül helyezéséről szóló, 2016. szeptember 14-i (EU) 2016/1627 rendelethez kapcsolódó nyilatkozata

(2016/C 340/01)

A Bizottság aggodalmát fejezi ki amiatt, hogy a társjogalkotók által rá ruházott szűk hatáskör miatt késedelmeket szenvedhet az ICCAT által a későbbiekben elfogadandó, a szervezet ellenőrzési rendszerét felülvizsgáló vagy korszerűsítő intézkedéseknek az európai uniós jog keretei közötti végrehajtása.

A Bizottság ezért kijelenti, hogy az említett rendelet nem érinti az EUMSZ 290. és 291. cikkének a regionális halászati gazdálkodási szervezetek intézkedései átültetésére való alkalmazásával kapcsolatban az intézmény által a jövőben kialakítandó álláspontokat.

A Bizottság ezen túlmenően fenntartja magának a jogot arra, hogy abban az esetben, ha a rendes jogalkotási eljárás útján való átültetés időigénye ellehetetlenítené az Európai Unió nemzetközi kötelezettségeinek teljesítését, a rendelet módosítására vonatkozó olyan javaslatokat terjesszen elő, amelyek bővítik a felhatalmazáson alapuló jogi aktusok vagy végrehajtási aktusok útján elfogadandó intézkedések körét.

---

(1)  HL L 252., 2016.9.16., 1. o.

---
### THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS rnmld c. lhrn Auwr~~ 

### ai. '~-EXAE *-mtNLIaaurr. lLrrb 14. 1939

Net ti rabealll~trlet 

### uhloh doe8mthave2o~igla8t Mlrol8eie8 

### but do.8 bmn eo 8eholmti88 by tlrtue

%I118 pwtleulrr 

### dwol dlBtrl8tMm eoqtllodrlth ti1tb~l81t.8 

### f&W8t8t~~id,bUt8tdOcid i8kitl& rithbld Ui the p#ad thmt th. trartf 8&Oh8tiU8 

### the dhtriat lul 8re not ‘ml.&JhalL 88hOh8tia8. 

### =?ublio8ohool &ua of Tox88 1938 -mder cbpter Nlamtom-c Nqual18atiar ?uad, II@- 

### tiar4prwlde81 bt~kUdtlndarth@~%8i#8 Oftht8 &t8h8n 

### be diatrlautedin suoh g uy 8~ to M8%8t 

### 811 8choo1 dl8triet8 Of aat ?8uW tbVb -w (20) 88hOb8tioe, eta . 

### %utloa 4 pw~lde8: 8tatea.U 

### uad&provlmlon8 of thI8 bt 8-11 be dlQtt+d Vpon th8 bU18 **Oi** Qu **tM8hW** for my au&e of 8UhOlMtie8 fPaa tuenty (20) **to** thiefflin (35)

. . :. .

. ...



### *X888ldWk.81 

### 4lmtrlrt entitled

**to** Itate 

### aid motrlthth8 hot it &#.a 8othavo tumtr 

### ‘or4laal’ 1*8, ht h.8 b8~O t-lltl 

### 8@hOh8ti88? Prm~lq'i&h88~~~u~;,u8 rl8hto dtl8otMt 

### 8wtlraS ottho

%8te*idWlldOrtbr)IwiBiOU O?thi8 

### bt8&ll bo (llrtrlbutod

in Mah l 

### way unto urirt 

### all rohool lirtrptl of 

### not liner that8 tuent~ (n0) Uholmt%e8

l l .

8@Ot?Oll4 Oftk"Rtnl Aid kU"potik8t 

### %ato aid mdor provl8lm8 of thl8 Ast rhallh alottodupe!tth8 )ui8 of 

### anetouherior Y timber lt 

### 88hOlUti88 ira 

### tWntr (m) 

### to thlx'tr-tire( 5) urd 

### (1) e4ditltmal~har fereaah aAditlo#mlthlrt~ 

### fo) oeolutler,.
. : kid 8Mtian 

### fhtrtm mu:

- bM18 tar UlieUtitiOtl @Ull k thr 

### mt saholutlo 8muwrrtion of white or 801OP.d ?8ae, u th8 8UO v k, iaotUditk# the tPUi8fOl.8 

### bt0 th8 d18- trLet*. . . **lb U**  **’ 8**  **of** 

### th8 opinlsn thbt **u a**  

### rrhool **di8trict Y8tlm**  

### all **of the**  **other requlrment8**  **88 plrovldod** **by tho**  

### "Rur81t~~elaw **,** 

### md 

## at tha 

## tln ha8 twenty 

### (to) roholutlro, lmlud truuferod ia M 

### thmo mumrated ia t& dirt-at, t 

### 18 entitle4**to** 

### rurkl **aid.**
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,
based on our evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Merrill W. Sherman

Merrill W. ShermanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-32338, No.333-35956, No. 333-56414 and No.333-64274 on Forms S-8 of
Predictive Systems, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2003 (March 27, 2003,
as to the disclosure of the settlement of a litigation claim described in Note
15), relating to the consolidated financial statements of Predictive Systems,
Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to i)
application of procedures related to the inclusion of the transitional
disclosures required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No.
142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", ii) the application of procedures
relating to certain disclosures of proforma stock-based compensation expense,
proforma net loss and proforma basic and diluted net loss per share and iii) the
application of procedures relating to the reclassification in the statements of
operations of Revenues and Cost of Revenues for reimbursed expenses required by
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-14 related to the 2001 and 2000
consolidated financial statements that were audited by other auditors who ceased
operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance
other than with respect to such disclosures and reclassifications and the
adoption of SFAS No. 142 and SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" ), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Predictive
Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York
March 31, 2003
<PAGE>
                                    EXHIBIT 10.55
                                   AMENDMENT NO. 1
                     TO EXECUTIVE OFFICERS' SEVERANCE BENEFIT PLAN


    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Executive Officers' Severance 
Benefit Plan is hereby amended to provide for a benefit period of up to 24 
months duration.  Section 2 (a) (v) is therefore amended to read as follows:

         (v) "Benefit Period" shall mean the period commencing on the date an
    employee of the Company other than the Chief Executive Officer becomes an
    Eligible Employee as defined in clause (i) of this Subsection (a) (the
    "Termination Date") and (i) continuing for eighteen (18) months following
    the Termination Date, if the Termination Date occurs at any time within
    sixty (60) days prior to, or twelve (12) months after, the Change in
    Control, or (ii) if the Termination Date occurs between thirteen (13)
    months and thirty (30) months following the Change in Control, continuing
    for the period following the Termination Date determined by reducing thirty
    (30) months by the number of months the Eligible Employee other than the
    Chief Executive Officer was employed by the Company following the Change in
    Control.  For example, if the Termination Date occurs twenty-three (23)
    months following the Change in Control, the Benefit Period shall be seven
    (7) months.


         For the Chief Executive Officer,  "Benefit Period" shall mean the
    period commencing on the date the Chief Executive Officer becomes an
    Eligible Employee as defined in clause (i) of this Subsection (a) (the
    "Termination Date") and (i) continuing for twenty-four (24) months
    following the Termination Date, if the Termination Date occurs at any time
    within sixty (60) days prior to, or twelve (12) months after, the Change in
    Control, or (ii) if the Termination Date occurs between thirteen (13)
    months and thirty-six (36) months following the Change in Control,
    continuing for the period following the Termination Date determined by
    reducing thirty-six (36) months by the number of months the Chief Executive
    Officer was employed by the Company following the Change in Control.  For
    example, if the Termination Date occurs twenty-three (23) months following
    the Change in Control, the Benefit Period shall be thirteen (13) months. 

                                       2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1607 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1607

 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend 
   the suspension of the limitation on the period for which certain 
           borrowers are eligible for guaranteed assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2011

 Mr. Fincher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 to extend 
   the suspension of the limitation on the period for which certain 
           borrowers are eligible for guaranteed assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Creating Real Opportunities for 
Prosperity (CROP) Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF LIMITATION ON PERIOD FOR WHICH BORROWERS ARE 
              ELIGIBLE FOR GUARANTEED ASSISTANCE.

    Section 5102 of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 
(7 U.S.C. 1949 note; Public Law 107-171) is amended by striking 
``December 31, 2010'' and inserting ``December 31, 2013''.
                                 <all>
```