alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Thomas S. Liston, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of eFunds Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date: August 5, 2004 /s/ Thomas S. Liston   By: Thomas S. Liston   Its:  Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. ("Communicate") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David M. Jeffs, President, Chief Executive Officer of Communicate and the sole member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of Communicate.
 
 /s/ David M. Jeffs  David M. Jeffs  Chief Executive Officer
  August 14, 2003
  
 
 
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. ("Communicate") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J. Cameron Pan, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Communicate, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of Communicate.
 
 /s/ J. Cameron Pan  J. Cameron Pan  Chief Financial Officer
  August 14, 2003
Independent Auditor's Report

Partners of
Presidential Towers

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Presidential Towers as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related statements of operations, changes in
partners' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Presidential Towers as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the years then ended in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.


/s/ Altschuler, Melvoin and Glasser LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 4, 2005
Exhibit
      10.25


**AMENDMENT
      TO EXECUTIVE**


**EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT**




WHEREAS,
      effective July 31, 2006, CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
      (“Employer”), and GIFFORD A. DIETERLE, a New York resident (“Executive”),
      entered into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”);
      and





WHEREAS, on
      July
      17, 2008, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the
      Company’s Board of Directors, the Board of Directors increased the salaries of
      our executive officers ;





NOW,
      THEREFORE, to effectuate the foregoing change in salary for Executive, Employer
      and Executive agree:





1.  Section
      3(a) of the Agreement is amended effective August 1, 2008 and, as amended,
      reads
      as follows:





(a)  *Base
      Salary* .
      As
      compensation for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Employer
      agrees to pay Executive a base salary at an annual rate of not less than
      $287,500 payable in installments in accordance with Employer’s standard payroll
      practices, subject to such payroll and withholding deductions as are required
      by
      law or authorized by Executive. The amount of the base salary shall be reviewed
      periodically and may be increased at the sole discretion of Employer.





2.  All
      other
      terms of the Agreement remain the same.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment to the Agreement
      effective July 17, 2008.





EMPLOYER
                :CAPITAL
                GOLD CORPORATIONBy:
            s/Jeffrey
                W. PritchardJeffrey
                W. Pritchard, Vice PresidentEXECUTIVE:s/Gifford
                A. DieterleGifford
                A. Dieterle
#### In re Ollie James COHEN.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 4, 1955.

No attorneys appeared of record on either side.

PER CURIAM.

Upon a hearing before it, the Trial Committee of the Kentucky State Bar Association found that Ollie James Cohen on pleas of guilty had been convicted in. the Criminal Branch of the Jefferson Circuit Court of three felonies. One conviction was for uttering the forged will of R. H. Skinner in the Jefferson County Court, upon which he was sentenced for two years in the penitentiary. The second conviction was for false swearing in a proceeding in the Jefferson County Juvenile Court where he was on trial charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor, Irene Cobb, upon which he was sentenced for one year in the penitentiary. This sentence was not to run concurrently with the two year sentence just mentioned. The Trial Committee further found that Cohen had been convicted of uttering the forged will of Margaret Davenport in the Jefferson County Court, upon which he was given a suspended sentence of ten years in the penitentiary, conditioned upon his good behavior and that he would not violate the probation laws of this state for thirty years. Also, the Committee found there were two indictments returned against Cohen in the Jefferson Criminal Court charging him with suborning Alfred W. Daugherty and Ruth Williams to commit perjury in the Jefferson County Court in the matters of probating the forged wills of Mr. Skinner and Mrs. Davenport. While it does not appear that Cohen was tried on these two last mentioned indictments, the report-of the Trial'Committee *states these*charges are undenied by him.'

The Trial Committee filed its report with the Board of Bar Commissioners showing Cohen had been guilty of unprofessional conduct and recommended that he be disbarred, and the seriousness of these charges be made a public record for consideration in the future should application ever be made for reinstatement.. The Board unanimously accepted the report of the Trial Committee and recommended to this court that Cohen be disbarred from engaging in the practice of law in this state on account of his unprofessional conduct.

In due time this court issued' a rule against Cohen in accordance with RCA 3.450 to show, cause, if any he could, within twenty days why the recommendation of the Board should not be enforced. Cohen having made no response to the rule within twenty days, or at all, after it was served upon him, we now adjudge the rule be made absolute and the report of the Board be confirmed.

An order will be entered disbarring Ollie James Cohen from the practice of law in this Commonwealth.
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

       We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-72633, 333-35042 and 333-35040)
and Form S-3 (No. 333-60890) of PurchaseSoft, Inc. of our report dated July
3, 2001, except as to Note 1 and Note 10, which are as of August 29, 2001,
relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
August 29, 2001
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 19, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130252 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PAMELA MACOR, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices 

Gary Macor, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130252 

 COA: 264076 

Genesee CC: 04-080340-NH 

ROBERT F. KOWALSKI, M.D.,

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

McLAREN REGIONAL MEDICAL 

CENTER, 

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

MARTA Z. BONKOWSKI, M.D.,

 Defendant.
 _________________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. 

l1016 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 19, 2007 

 Clerk
## FW: Cancel 333 exemption 9-AJV-115-UASOrganization (FAA)

FYI Kind Regards, S D Program Support Specialist Federal Aviation Administration

From: LANCIOAIR [mailto:lancioair@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 10:46 AM To: 9-AJV-115-UASOrganization (FAA) Subject: Cancel 333 exemption Hi I’d like to request a remission or can cellation of my Section 333 exemption. I was granted exemption # 16633 May 4th 2016 but I never actually used it. I only flew my Phantom 3 (N739L) recreatio nally few times and never commercially. Also, with the new Part 107 regulations, I’m pos itive that I will not need the exemption anyway. Please rescind/cancel my exemption. Thank you very much. Pierluigi Lanciotti 104 Windchase dr Lafayette, LA 70508 337-356-1854 Exemption No 16633 Docket No FAA-2015-2943 Pierluigi Lanciotti Sent : Wednesday , November 09, 2016 4:23 PM To: 9-AWA-AVS-333Exe mptions (FAA) 

### Page 1 of 1 FW: Cancel 333 exemptio n

11 /21 / 201 6 https://email.dot.gov/owa/ 9 -AWA -AV S -333Exemptions@faa.gov/? ae=Item&t=IPM.Not...
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41134

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

versus JOSEPH VITO FAZIO, Defendant-Appellant

************************************************************ No. 97-41135
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

versus LEE JAMES JENSEN Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Texas

(1:96-CR-117-2) September 14, 1998

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * This case presents a close question regarding the validity of2

an automobile search on an interstate highway. It boils down to a judgment call of whether the arresting officer unreasonably extended an otherwise legal detention. We have considered the briefs, heard oral argument, reviewed the transcripts of the videotaped arrest, and the hearings on the motion to suppress. Ultimately, we are persuaded that the district
court did not err in denying the mot ion to suppress. For essentially the reasons stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.
1

Rule 219. Annual Registration of Attorneys 

(a) Every attorney admitted to practice law in this Commonwealth shall pay an 

annual fee of [$120.00] $140.00 and electronically file the annual fee form provided for in 

this rule by July 1. The fee shall be collected under the supervision of the Attorney 

Registration Office, which shall make the annual fee form available for filing through a 

link on the Board’s website (http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org) or directly at 

https://ujsportal.pacourts.us. The said fee shall be used to defray the costs of disciplinary 

administration and enforcement under these rules, and for such other purposes as the 

Board shall, with the approval of the Supreme Court, from time to time determine. Upon 

an attorney’s written request submitted to the Attorney Registration Office and for good 

cause shown, the Attorney Registration Office shall grant an exemption from the 

electronic filing requirement and permit the attorney to file the annual fee form in paper 

form. 

 *****
2

Rule 502. Pennsylvania Lawyers Fund for Client Security 

*****

(b) Additional fee. Every attorney who is required to pay an active annual fee under 

Rule 219 (relating to annual registration of attorneys) shall pay an additional fee of 

[$75.00] $60.00 for use by the Fund. Such additional fee shall be added to, and collected 

with and in the same manner as, the basic annual fee. All amounts received pursuant to 

this subdivision shall be credited to the Fund. 

*****
3

Rule 1.15. Safekeeping Property

*****

(u) Every attorney who is required to pay an active annual assessment under Rule 

219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (relating to annual registration 

of attorneys) shall pay an additional annual fee of [$30.00] $25.00 for use by the IOLTA 

Board. Such additional assessment shall be added to, and collected with and in the same 

manner as, the basic annual assessment. All amounts received pursuant to this 

subdivision shall be credited to the IOLTA Board. 

*****
#### The Union Savings & Loan Co., Appellee, *v.*Zangerle, Aud., et al., Appellants. (Two Cases.)

(Nos. 27562 and 27563

Decided May 24, 1939.)

*Messrs. Mooney, Hahn, Loeser, Keough $ Freedheim,*for appellee.

*Mr. Frank T. Gullitan,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. Sattl S. Da/nacecm,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeals as of right he, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Myers, J., not participating.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000950 17-APR-2020 07:46 AM
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

CECILE FOY GSANGER NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

June 11, 2015

Hon. Von H. Shelton

Attorney At Law

2038 E. Mulberry St.

Angleton, Tx 77515

- 3923

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Bernard T. Klimist

Attorney At Law

204 E. Santa Rosa St.

Victoria, TX 77901

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00003

- CV

Tr.Ct.No. 10

- 1

- 13638

Style: ABEL MORENO v. KENNETH W. LANGSTON

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Cecile Foy Gsanger, Clerk

CFG:ch

Enc.

cc: 267 th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. Sharon Mathis , Jackson County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL )
Consent of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 

 
  
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Nos. 333-73898 and 333-12208), of Terra Networks, S.A. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 25, 2004 (except for the note 22, as to which the date is June 25, 2004), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Terra Networks, S.A. for the
year ended December 31, 2003. 
  
 Deloitte & Touche España, S.L.

  
  
 Madrid, Spain, June 28, 2004
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.



Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(the
Companies)



Written Statement by Chief
Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies Form 10-Q periodic
report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in that report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of that date.



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|                                               
|/S/    MICHAEL D.
LOCKHART                     
|Michael D. Lockhart                            
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                               
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and                   
|Armstrong World Industries, Inc.               



Dated: August 2, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal C 330/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 330 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 598 September 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 330

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 598 September 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 330/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8163 — AC/EYSA/JV) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2016/C 330/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8127 — Volvo Car Corporation/Volverk/Volvofinans Bank) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 330/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8163 — AC/EYSA/JV) (
  1
  )

1

1

2016/C 330/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8127 — Volvo Car Corporation/Volverk/Volvofinans Bank) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 330/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2016/C 330/04 | Special Report No 20/2016 — ‘Strengthening administrative capacity in Montenegro: progress but better results needed in many key areas’ | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 330/03

Euro exchange rates

2

Court of Auditors

2016/C 330/04

Special Report No 20/2016 — ‘Strengthening administrative capacity in Montenegro: progress but better results needed in many key areas’

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 330/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8099 — Nissan/Mitsubishi) (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2016/C 330/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8131 — Tele2 Sverige/TDC Sverige) (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 330/07 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 6 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2016/C 330/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8099 — Nissan/Mitsubishi) (
  1
  )

1

4

2016/C 330/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8131 — Tele2 Sverige/TDC Sverige) (
  1
  )

1

5

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2016/C 330/07

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN