alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2559

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Frank R. Peerman, also known as *

Barron Richard Hynes, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: September 7, 2000

 Filed: October 10, 2000

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frank Peerman appeals from the district court’s1 denial of reconsideration of his

February 23, 1999 sentence-modification motion. We conclude that this ruling was

correct because the sentence-modification motion--whether construed as an attempt to

pursue a direct appeal from Peerman’s September 12, 1997 resentencing, or as a 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion--was untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i) (10-day time

limit); 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1-year time limit).
-2-

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R.

47A(a).

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
June 20, 2015

Mr. Jamie C. Hopkins

Mr. Kevin D. Jackman

Aerial Media FL LLC

921 51st Street Gulf, Apartment C

Marathon, FL 33050

Dear Messrs. Hopkins and Jackman:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 45.23, 47.3, 61.3, 61.315(b)(2) and (3) 91.119, 91.153, 91.155, 91.167, 91.169, 91.203, 

91.207, 91.209, 91.409, 91.411, 91.417, and part 21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 

30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your May 18, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Aerial Media FL LLC into 

the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1749), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Geoffrey Hampson,
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the
  Company.






/s/
C. Geoffrey
Hampson


C.
Geoffrey Hampson


Principal
Financial Officer


May 15,
2008
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105

- 2498

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: MOVES Code a nd Database s Used to Generate In ventories for Air Quality

Modeling for the Tier 3 NPRM

— Addendum

FROM: Harvey Michaels

Assessment and Standards Division

Office of T ransportation and Air Quality

TO: Docket : EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 20 1 1

- 0 135

DATE: 7 May 2013

The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit a CD containing some additional MOVES

databases used for air quality modeling that were left off the earlier CD ( Document ID EPA

- HQ

OAR

- 2011

- 0135

- DRAFT

- 0540 )

.

Table 1 lists the contents of the disk.

Table 1

. Contents of accompanying disk

Database Tables

natldef20051730 hpmsvtypeyear

, sourcetypeagedistribution

, sourcetypeyear

tier3ctlrates cumtvvcoeffs

, emissionratebyage

Attachment OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1450 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1450

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate any time 
       limitation for granting equitable innocent spouse relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2011

    Mrs. Bachmann (for herself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate any time 
       limitation for granting equitable innocent spouse relief.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF TIME LIMITATION FOR EQUITABLE INNOCENT SPOUSE 
              RELIEF.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (f) of section 6015 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``without regard to any 
time limitation'' before the period at the end.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to any liability for taxes arising or remaining unpaid on 
or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from (a) the
Company's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1996, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such (b) financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,080
<SECURITIES>                                    53,626
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                       225
<INVENTORY>                                      1,108
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,226
<PP&E>                                           1,546
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,297
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,902
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,462
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,067)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,297
<SALES>                                          3,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,959
<CGS>                                            2,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.97)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 3.3

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
TO THE
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
SILVERTHORNE PRODUCTION COMPANY

         Pursuant to the provisions of the Colorado  Business  Corporation  Act,
the undersigned  corporation  ("Corporation")  adopts the following  Articles of
Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation.

         FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is Silverthorne Production Company.

         SECOND:  The following  amendment to the Articles of Incorporation  was
duly adopted by the directors on June 12, 2000, and by the  shareholders on July
11,  2000.  The  number of votes cast for the  amendment  by each  voting  group
entitled to vote separately on the amendment was sufficient for approval by that
voting group.

         Article  FIRST of the  Articles  of  Incorporation  is  amended  in its
entirety so that as amended it reads as follows:

                  FIRST:  The name of the corporation is Cognigen Networks, Inc.


Dated:  July 11, 2000.


                                     SILVERTHORNE PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC.,
                                     a Colorado corporation

                                     By: /s/ David L. Jackson
                                         ---------------------------
                                         David L. Jackson, Secretary
<PAGE>
Exhibit
10.3


 


Atlantic Express
Transportation Group Inc.


Atlantic Express
Transportation Corp.


7 North Street


Staten Island, NY  10302


 


April 20, 2004


 


Domenic Gatto


136 Monmouth Road


Monroe Township, NJ 08831


 


Dear Domenic:


 


Reference is made to your fourth amended and restated
employment agreement dated as of November 25, 2003 (the “Agreement”) and more
specifically to Section 2.4 of the Agreement concerning your Exit Bonus.


 


As you know, we are in the process of completing a
bond financing which will result in the issuance of penny warrants to acquire
shares equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the issued and outstanding stock of
Atlantic Express Transportation Corp. 
This letter shall confirm that the issuance of such warrants shall not
reduce the amount of your Exit Bonus. In this regard, the first sentence of
Section 2.4(a) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:


 


Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control at any time
after the Effective Date and prior to December 31, 2010, the Company shall pay
to the Executive a bonus (“Exit Bonus”) which shall be equal to the Fair Market
Value (as of the date of such Change of Control) of 1.5% of the common stock
(on a fully diluted basis), of either the Company or Group, whichever entity is
the subject of the Change of Control (the “Base Amount).


 


All other terms of your employment contract remain in
full force and effect without any change or modification thereto.


 


	
   

  	
  Very truly yours,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Atlantic Express Transportation Group Inc.

  
	
   

  	
  Atlantic Express Transportation Corp.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
    /s/ PETER
  FRANK

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Peter Frank
#### The State, ex rel. Stahl, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 27029

Decided March 22, 1939.)

*Mr. R. R. Zurmehly*and *Mr. W. 8. Marshall,*for relator.

*Mr. Herbert 8. Duffy*and *Mr. T. J. Herbert,*attorneys general, *Mr. Eugene Carlin, Mr. C. L. Hawthorne*and *Mr. E. P. Fellter,*for respondent.

By the Court.

In 1928, relator, Carl A. Stahl, suffered an injury in the course of his employment. The Industrial Commission awarded him the maximum of $3,750 for temporary total disability, the maximum of $3,750 for impairment of earning capacity and $18.75 per week for permanent and total disability, which latter amount was paid until April, 1937, when the commission suspended payments. In addition, approximately $2,300 had been paid for medical services.

In October, 1937, the Industrial Commission, acting under the provisions of Section 1465-86, General Code, entered an order reciting that the relator had been paid compensation at the maximum impairment rate, that for a year or more he had been engaged in activities wholly inconsistent with representations that he was incapable of engaging in any'occupation, that he “was in condition to perform a substantial amount of work,” and that over certain periods he had been paid compensation in excess of that which he should have received. The commission therefore found that he was not and had not been permanently and totally disabled since December, 1936, or prior thereto, and ordered that no further compensation or medical ex*169penses be paid, unless it was shown in the future by substantial proof that such action was warranted after consideration by the commission. In February, 1938, the commission ordered payments to be suspended after April, 1937.

A petition in mandamus was filed in this court,,seeking a writ commanding the Industrial Commission to reinstate relator’s claim as a permanent and total disability and to pay compensation therefor. Issues were joined by an answer and reply.

Section 1465-86, General Code, gives the Industrial Commission continuing jurisdiction over each case with power to modify or change former findings and orders. Section 1465-90, General Code (111 Ohio Laws, 218), grants full power and authority to the commission to determine the extent of disability and the amount of compensation to be paid, with finality of decision.

The record in this case disclosing no abuse of discretion the writ of mandamus is denied: *State, ex rel. Kauffman,*v. *Industrial Commission,*121 Ohio St., 472, 169 N. E., 572; *State, ex rel. Hudziecko,*v. *Industrial Commission,*132 Ohio St., 444, 8 N. E. (2d), 562; *State, ex rel. Coen,*v. *Industrial Commission,*126 Ohio St., 550, 186 N. E., 398.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3012 GEORGE W. WINGO,

Petitioner,

v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in DA0752080083-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER George W. Wingo moves for leave to file a supplemental appendix to his corrected opening brief and appendix that includes United States Merit Systems Protection Board's certified list. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The court will treat the motion, with a blue cover, which includes a faxed copy of the certified index, as a supplement to his corrected opening brief and appendix. A copy of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel to inform the panel that the motion is treated as a supplemental appendix. FOR THE COURT 

### MAR 13

# 2009 /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly FILED

US. COURT OF APPEALS FOR Clerk THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Hope H. Camp, Jr., Esq. s20 Michael D. Austin, Esq. MAR 1 3 2009

r. Date
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Take A Ride, Inc (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Anthony N.DeMint                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief AccountingOfficer

 

May 20, 2005
#### Robert H. BROOKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27573.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 27, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while. intoxicated; the punishment, one year in jail and a fine of $50.' ' " ■

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear, to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed. ■ ■ •; , ... . .
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE TEST PROCEDURE FOR

AUTOMATIC COMMERCIAL ICE MAKERS 

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585 

Room 8E-089 

Friday April 29, 2011 

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties 

on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR) addressing the test procedure for automatic 

commercial ice makers. The NOPR proposes amendments to the existing DOE test procedure 

for automatic commercial ice makers. 

Agenda

9:00 – 9:30 am Welcome, Introductions & Opening Remarks 

Doug Brookman, Public Solutions

9:30 – 9:45 am Rulemaking History & Timelines 

Charles Llenza, U.S. Department of Energy 

Summary of the statutory background and rulemaking history of the 

automatic commercial ice makers (ACIM) test procedure.

9:45 – 11:15 am Proposed Test Procedure Amendments 

Sarah Widder, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

Presentation and discussion of the proposed amendments to the DOE test 

procedure, including presentation of the scope and issues related to the 

current DOE test procedure.

11:15 – 11:30 am Break

11:30 – 12:30 pm Other Test Procedure Issues

Sarah Widder, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

Summary and discussion of issues related to the ACIM test procedure that 

are not specifically addressed in the discussion of test procedure revisions. 

12:30 – 12:45 pm Burden of Testing & Regulatory Review 

Sarah Widder, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

Presentation and discussion of the burden to manufacturers incurred from 

the proposed amendments to the DOE test procedure and of the initial 

regulatory flexibility analysis. 

12:45 – 1:00 pm Closing Remarks, Information, & Contacts 

Doug Brookman, Public Solutions 

1:00 pm Adjourn
EXHIBIT 32
                                                             ----------

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-KSB/A of Touchstone Applied Science Associates,
Inc. (the "Company"), for the period ended October 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew
L. Simon, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Touchstone
Applied Science Associates, Inc., to the best of my
knowledge, that:

            1.	The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.	The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  June 13, 2005                   /s/ ANDREW L. SIMON
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Andrew L. Simon, President,
                                         Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Touchstone Applied
Science Associates, Inc. and will be retained by
Touchstone Applied Science Associates, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Kathleen P. Bloch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of PC Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of PC Group, Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:  March
      18, 2010
            /s/  Kathleen P.
      BlochKathleen
      P. Bloch, Vice President, Chief Operating
              Officer
      and Chief Financial Officer