alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1543 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1543

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of 
    receipt of outpatient observation services in a hospital toward 
  satisfying the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of 
           skilled nursing facility services under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2011

  Mr. Courtney (for himself and Mr. Latham) introduced the following 
  bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in 
 addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of 
    receipt of outpatient observation services in a hospital toward 
  satisfying the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of 
           skilled nursing facility services under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Access to Medicare 
Coverage Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. COUNTING A PERIOD OF RECEIPT OF OUTPATIENT OBSERVATION SERVICES 
              IN A HOSPITAL TOWARD THE 3-DAY INPATIENT HOSPITAL 
              REQUIREMENT FOR COVERAGE OF SKILLED NURSING FACILITY 
              SERVICES UNDER MEDICARE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(i) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395x(i)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``For 
purposes of this subsection, an individual receiving outpatient 
observation services shall be deemed to be an inpatient during such 
period, and the date such individual ceases receiving such services 
shall be deemed the hospital discharge date (unless such individual is 
admitted as a hospital inpatient at the end of such period).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to receipt of outpatient observation services beginning on or 
after January 1, 2011, but applies to a period of post-hospital 
extended care services that was completed before the date of the 
enactment of this Act only if an administrative appeal is or has been 
made with respect to such services not later than 90 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act. Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services may implement such 
amendment through an interim final regulation, program instruction, or 
otherwise.
                                 <all>
```
DENY and Opinion Filed March 21, 2022

In the

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-01085-CV

IN RE PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-14494

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Partida-Kipness, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Carlyle

Relator’s December 9, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial 

court’s order granting real party in interest’s application to enforce the arbitration 

subpoena. Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to show that the trial court 

clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate appellate remedy. In re 

Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 

After reviewing the petition, response, reply, and the record, we conclude that 

relator has failed to show its entitlement to the relief requested. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We also lift the 

stay issued by our December 10, 2021 order.
–2–

211085f.p05 /Cory L. Carlyle/

CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT-23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors of Network Six, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-87208) on Form S-8 of Network Six, Inc. of our report dated March 28, 1997
relating to the statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows of
Network Six, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in
the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Network Six, Inc.

Our report, dated March 28, 1997, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
the Company became a defendant in significant litigation with the State of
Hawaii (the "State") related to its system implementation contract with the
State, has become a party to other litigation related to the Hawaii contract,
has suffered recurring losses, and has a bank financing agreement which has
expired. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability
to continue as a going concern. The 1996 financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Providence, Rhode Island
March 16, 1999
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.



Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(the
Companies)



Written Statement by Chief
Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies Form 10-Q periodic
report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in that report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies as of that date.



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|/s/    MICHAEL D.
LOCKHART                                   
|Michael D. Lockhart                                          
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer              
|Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and Armstrong World Industries, Inc.



Dated: October 27, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Companies and will be retained by the Companies and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tvia, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Arthur Nguyen, Acting
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
based on my knowledge:

        (1)
        the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
        certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
        with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

        (2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.

Dated: November 11, 2002                         /s/  ARTHUR NGUYEN
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Arthur Nguyen
                                                 Acting Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1445 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from 

regulating, based on material composition, any type of firearm ammunition or fishing tackle. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2011 

Mr. BROUN of Georgia (for himself, Mr. BOREN, Mr. ROSS of Arkansas, Mr. 

ALTMIRE, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. REHBERG, Ms. 

JENKINS, and Mr. MILLER of Florida) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating, based on material composition, any type of firearm ammunition or fishing tackle. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIREARM AMMUNITION AND FISHING TACKLE. 

4 The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 

5 Agency may not prohibit, limit, or control, based on mate6 rial composition, any type of firearm ammunition or fish7 ing tackle. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### L. D. WALL et al., Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 31112.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 9, 1959.

Brown & Shuman, by Clifford N. Brown, Lubbock, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a final judgment entered against the appellant, L. D. Wall, as principal and the appellants Dub Lawson and Edna Mae Brown, as sureties upon the forfeiture of an appearance bond executed by them.

The bond executed by appellants was undated but was approved by the Sheriff of Lubbock County on the 1st day of May, 1958 and filed in cause No. 24,702, styled The State of Texas v. L. D. Wall on the Docket of the County Court at Law of Lubbock County on the 3rd day of May, 1958.

Judgment nisi was entered when the appellant Wall failed to appear when his case was called for trial on August 29, 1958.

The bond was conditioned that the appellant Wall “shall well and truly make his personal appearance before the Co. Ct. at Law of Lubbock Co.; *K*County, Texas, at the next term of said court, at Lubbock, *885Texas, on the 5th day of May, 1957,

It is apparent that under the recited provisions of the bond the principal Wall was required to appear in court at a date some 11 months and 25 days anterior to the time the bond was approved by the Sheriff, which, in the absence of showing to the contrary, we must presume was the date the bond was executed. Pollock v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 404, 299 S.W.2d 294.

 A bond which requires the principal to appear at a date anterior to the time it is executed renders the same invalid as being impossible of performance. See Butler v. State, 31 Tex.Cr.R. 63, 19 S.W. 676 and Milliorn v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 137, 166 S.W.2d 926. For such reason the bond in the instant case is invalid and the judgment rendered thereon cannot be sustained.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending May 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Sutyak certify in my capacity as Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
hereunto signed as of July 20, 2010.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Greg Sutyak                                      
|Greg Sutyak                                          
|Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by

the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000727069
<NAME>                        PS PARTNERS II, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                           1
<CURRENCY>                                                           U.S.
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                     12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                Jan-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                 Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                        1
<CASH>                                                         1,239,000
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    123,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               1,362,000
<PP&E>                                                        90,636,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (37,683,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                54,558,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            946,000
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    38,543,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  54,558,000
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              15,456,000
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  6,037,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               3,654,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                14,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                4,114,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            4,114,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   4,114,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      28.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      28.10
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26
 
RESOLVED, that the Company does hereby amend the KSOP, effective as of the
Effective Date (as defined under the Plan), as follows:
 
          Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, if no more than
     one-third ( 1/3) of the Employer Regular ESOP Contributions and Employer
     Matching ESOP Contributions to the Plan for a given Plan Year, which are
     deductible under Code section 404(a)(9), are allocated to Highly
     Compensated Employees, the limitations imposed by Code section 415 shall
     not apply to:
 
             (A) Forfeitures of Employer Securities under the Plan, if such
        securities were acquired with the proceeds of a loan (as described in
        Code section 404(a)(9)(A)), or
 
             (B) Employer Regular ESOP Contributions or Employer Matching ESOP
        Contributions to the Plan which are deductible under Code section
        404(a)(9)(B) and charged against the applicable Participant's
        Account(s).
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Diane Bjorkstrom, Chief Financial Officer of Tvia, Inc. (theCompany), certify, in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, that based on my knowledge: (1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. Dated: February 14, 2005
    
    /s/   Diane BjorkstromDiane BjorkstromChief Financial Officer and Vice President,Administration
----

Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO******18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002****

In connection with the Annual Report of Magic Media Networks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Scott Venters, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:           (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|   |   |                                                   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                               |   |
|   |   |                                                        |   |
|   |   | Gordon Scott Venters           Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   |                                                   |   |
| Date:  |   | June 19, 2003                                          |   |
|   |   |                                                        |   |
EXHIBIT 10.24.1
WESTERN GOLDFIELDS, INC.
Office:   7000 Independence Parkway                   Telephone (972)208-0696
          Suite 160, #135                                   Fax (972)208-2155
          Plano, Texas 75025
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

January 6, 2004

Mr. Perry Durning
La Cuesta International, Inc. (LCI)
El Cajon Office
1805 Wedgemere Road
El Cajon, CA 92020
(619) 688-9272

     RE:  Letter of Interest - Johnson and Mealy Mining Lease
          Assignments/Transfers and Royalty Agreement

Dear Mr. Durning,

     Pursuant to our discussions over the past few weeks, Western Goldfields,
Inc. (Western Goldfields) is interested in entering into an Exploration and
Mining Acquisition and Royalty Agreement with La Cuesta International, Inc.
(LCI) for the assignment of the Johnson and Mealy Mining Lease Agreements.

     The suggested terms proposed are as follows:

     1.   A one-time payment of US $10,000 to LCI for the assignment and
          transfer of all rights, titles and interest of the Mealy and Johnson
          Mining Lease Agreements to WG.
     2.   Reimbursement of US $10,500 to LCI's for securing and maintaining
          mining lease payments made to Mealy (7/1/03 - $2,500; 1/1/04 - $5,000)
          and Johnson (9/8/03 $1,000; 12/19/03 - $2,000).
     3.   WG will issue LCI 25,000 shares of its common stock and include these
          shares in a subsequent amendment to its SB2 registration statement
          currently being filed.
     4.   A  % Net Smelter Return Royalty from the mealy and Johnson properties
          as defined in the Mealy and Johnson Mining Lease Agreements.
     5.   Should WG choose to terminate either or both mining leases, LCI shall
          be given the option to have the unencumbered leases assigned back to
          LCI. Upon assignment back to LCI, LCI would assume all terms and
          conditions of lease or leases.
     6.   WG shall have the right to transfer any and all rights, titles, and
          interests of the Mealy and/or Johnson Mining Leases Agreements or
          Mining Property.


<PAGE>
A formal agreement shall be completed between LCI and WG as soon as reasonably
practical incorporating the above terms and general terms.

If you agree to the terms outlined above, please so indicate by signing below
and returning one original to me.

Sincerely,

Toby (Thomas) K. Mancuso

ACCEPTED AND AGREED to this  7  day of January 2004
                            ---

LA CUESTA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By:  /s/ W. Perry Durning
   ----------------------
Name:  Perry W. Durning
Title:  President

ACCEPTED AND AGREED to this  6  day of January 2004
                            ---

WESTERN GOLDFIELDS, INC.

By:  /s/ Thomas K. Mancuso
   -----------------------
Name:  Thomas K. Mancuso
Title:  President


<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofYFC 355 Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 3, 2006