alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 24.4**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY(Annual Report on Form 10-K)**

 

The undersigned, anofficer and/or director of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.,constitutes and appoints Nicholas Konidaris and J. Michael Dodson, and each ofthem, his or her true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts andthings and execute in his or her name as an officer or director of the Companythe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 28, 2005 andany and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm allthat said attorneys and agents and each of them shall do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof.  Any one of said attorneysor agents shall have, and may exercise, all powers conferred.

 

Dated:  July 21, 2005.

 
|   | /s/ W. ARTHUR PORTER |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | W. Arthur Porter          |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,389
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,635
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    124,359
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         86,692
<ALLOWANCE>                                        500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 226,027
<DEPOSITS>                                     145,675
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             41,994
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 226,027
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,294
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,485
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   141
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,920
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,390
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,171
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,749
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 110
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,092
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,707
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.20
<LOANS-NON>                                         63
<LOANS-PAST>                                       446
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   500
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  500
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             25



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.4


                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONCEPTUS, INC.
                        1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


                                 CONCEPTUS, INC.

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                        1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

                        1995 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
                           ADOPTED: NOVEMBER 22, 1995
                     APPROVED BY STOCKHOLDERS: JANUARY 1996

                 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
                             ADOPTED: MARCH 23, 2004


      Pursuant to Sections 19 and 20 of the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Plan") of Conceptus, Inc. (the "Company"), the Company hereby amends the
Plan as follows:

      1.    Section 6(b) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:

            "A participant may discontinue his or her participation in the Plan
      as provided in Section 10, or, on one occasion only during the Offering
      Period, may decrease the rate of his or her Contributions during the
      Offering Period by completing and filing with the Company a new
      subscription agreement, which change in rate shall become effective as
      soon as practicable after receipt of such subscription agreement by the
      Company."

                               * * * * * * * * * *

            I hereby certify that the foregoing Amendment to the Plan was duly
      adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company effective as of March 23,
      2004.

      Executed on this 23rd day of March, 2004.

                                    /s/ Michael W. Hall
                                    ------------------------------
                                    Michael W. Hall, Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1426 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1426

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan 
               Repayment Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 2011

  Mrs. Emerson (for herself and Mr. Ross of Arkansas) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 
   of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan 
               Repayment Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physical Therapist Student Loan 
Repayment Eligibility Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICIPATION OF PHYSICAL 
              THERAPISTS IN LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Mission of Corps; Definition of Primary Health Services.--
Section 331(a)(3)(D) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ``or mental health,'' and 
inserting ``mental health, or physical therapy,''.
    (b) Loan Repayment Program.--Section 338B of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l-1) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``and physician 
        assistants;'' and inserting ``physician assistants, and 
        physical therapists;''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting before the 
                semicolon the following: ``, or have a doctoral or 
                master's degree in physical therapy'';
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``physical 
                therapy,'' after ``mental health,''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by inserting 
                ``physical therapy,'' after ``dentistry,''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of iPCS, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedcertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Timothy M. Yager                                                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy  M. Yager, President and Chief Executive Officer                             |   |
| Date:  July 31, 2009                                                            |   |
|                                                                                 |   |
|                                                                                 |   |
| /s/  Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr.                                                   |   |
| Stebbins  B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:  July 31, 2009                                                            |   |

 

----
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1461 

To authorize the Mescalero Apache Tribe to lease adjudicated water rights. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2011 

Mr. PEARCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Mescalero Apache Tribe to lease adjudicated 

water rights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mescalero Apache 

5 Tribe Leasing Authorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) ADJUDICATED WATER RIGHTS.—The term 

9 ‘‘adjudicated water rights’’ means water rights that 

10 were adjudicated to the Tribe in State v. Lewis, 116 

11 N.M. 194, 861 P. 2d 235 (1993). 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1461 IH

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of the Interior. 

3 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

4 of New Mexico. 

5 (4) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Mes6 calero Apache Tribe. 

7 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION TO LEASE ADJUDICATED WATER 

8 RIGHTS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi10 sion of law, subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Tribe 

11 may lease, enter into a contract with respect to, or other12 wise transfer to another party, for another purpose, or to 

13 another place of use in the State, all or any portion of 

14 the adjudicated water rights. 

15 (b) STATE LAW.—In carrying out any action under 

16 subsection (a), the Tribe shall comply with all laws (in17 cluding regulations) of the State with respect to the leas18 ing or transfer of water rights. 

19 (c) ALIENATION; MAXIMUM TERM.— 

20 (1) ALIENATION.—The Tribe shall not perma21 nently alienate any adjudicated water rights. 

22 (2) MAXIMUM TERM.—The term of any water 

23 use lease, contract, or other agreement under this 

24 section (including a renewal of such an agreement) 

25 shall be not more than 99 years. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1461 IH

1 (d) LIABILITY.—The Secretary shall not be liable to 

2 the Tribe or any other person for any loss or other det3 riment resulting from a lease, contract, or other arrange4 ment entered into pursuant to this section. 

5 (e) PURCHASES OR GRANTS OF LAND FROM INDI6 ANS.—The authorization provided by this Act for the leas7 ing, contracting, and transfer of the adjudicated water 

8 rights shall be considered to satisfy any requirement for 

9 authorization of the action by treaty or convention im10 posed by section 2116 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 

11 177). 

12 (f) PROHIBITION ON FORFEITURE.—The nonuse of 

13 all or any portion of the adjudicated water rights by a 

14 lessee or contractor shall not result in the forfeiture, aban15 donment, relinquishment, or other loss of all or any por16 tion of the adjudicated water rights. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### Daniel Antonio GUZMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 31086.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1959.

No attorney for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order revoking probation.

The record reveals the following: On January 5, 1956, in cause No. 7544 in the District Court of Plidalgo County, relator plead guilty to the offense of burglary and was assessed a five-year term in the penitentiary. Execution of the sentence was suspended and relator was placed on probation, among the conditions being that he should not violate the law or leave the State of Texas without the permission of the Court.

At the hearing on the motion to revoke it was shown that relator had reported to his probation officer that on two occasions he had gone to Mexico to buy intoxicants without having received the permission of the court. The State further introduced sufficient evidence to support a conviction against the relator for the theft of an automobile tire and wheel. In addition to the above, the State proved that the relator had at different times shortly before the motion to revoke was filed plead guilty in the Justice Court for disturbing the peace, had been convicted for failing to stop and give information after a collision, and had plead guilty for vagrancy.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, denied that he had crossed the bridge into Mexico and explained his convictions by saying that the officers “were on his back.”

No brief has been filed and no formal bills of exception appear in the record.

We fail to find an abuse of discretion in revoking probation, and the judgment is affirmed.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1358 

To rescind certain Federal funds identified by States as unwanted and use 

the funds to reduce the Federal debt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2011 

Mr. REHBERG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To rescind certain Federal funds identified by States as 

unwanted and use the funds to reduce the Federal debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Returned Exclusively 

5 For Unpaid National Debt Act’’ or the ‘‘REFUND Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF UNWANTED FEDERAL FUNDS TO REDUCE 

7 FEDERAL DEBT. 

8 (a) RESCISSION OF UNWANTED FEDERAL FUNDS.— 

9 There is rescinded, from any Federal funds required to 

10 be allocated by formula among all States that agree to 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1358 IH

1 use such funds for a specified purpose, an amount equal 

2 to the amount of such funds that would have otherwise 

3 been allocated to a State that identifies such funds under 

4 subsection (b) as unwanted. 

5 (b) IDENTIFICATION OF FUNDS.—Subsection (a) 

6 shall only apply if, not later than the last date on which 

7 an application or State plan must be submitted in order 

8 for a State to be allocated, in an annual or biennial budget 

9 cycle, funds described in such subsection— 

10 (1) the State legislature with jurisdiction over 

11 such budget cycle adopts a concurrent resolution 

12 identifying the funds as unwanted; and 

13 (2) the State submits notice of the resolution 

14 described in paragraph (1) to the agency head re15 sponsible for allocation of the funds, in such form 

16 and manner and containing such information as the 

17 agency head determines appropriate to make the de18 termination in subsection (c). 

19 (c) DETERMINATION OF AMOUNT TO BE RE20 SCINDED.—An agency head that receives notice described 

21 in subsection (b)(2) shall determine and report to the Of22 fice of Management and Budget the amount to be re23 scinded under subsection (a). 

24 (d) USE FOR REDUCTION OF FEDERAL DEBT.— 

25 Amounts rescinded under subsection (a) shall be deposited 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1358 IH

1 by the Secretary of the Treasury in the special fund ac2 count ‘‘Gifts to Reduce Debt Held by the Public, Bureau 

3 of the Public Debt, Treasury’’ and used to reduce the Fed4 eral debt as provided in section 3113(d) of title 31, United 

5 States Code. 

6 (e) ANNUAL REPORT.—The Secretary of the Treas7 ury shall submit to the Congress each year a report identi8 fying the amount deposited in the Treasury under sub9 section (d) with respect to each State in such year. 

10 (f) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

11 (1) The term ‘‘agency head’’ means the head of 

12 a department or agency of the Federal Government. 

13 (2) The term ‘‘State’’ means— 

14 (A) each of the several States; 

15 (B) the District of Columbia; or 

16 (C) any commonwealth, territory, or pos17 session of the United States. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
MEMORANDUM

Date: January 31, 2014

Subject: Group IV Polymers and Resins Risk Modeling File

From: Nick Parsons, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/RCG

To: EPA Docket File (EPA-HQ-OAR-2011–0435)

The attached “PR4_ABS_ModFiles_20130813.zip” file contains the emissions inventory used 

for the risk modeling of the Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Resin Production (ABS) source 

category.

PR4_ABS_ModFiles_

20130813.zip

The attached “PR4_MBS_ModFiles_20130410.zip” file contains the emissions inventory used 

for the risk modeling of the Methyl Methacrylate Butadiene Styrene Production (MBS) source 

category.

PR4_MBS_ModFiles_

20130410.zip

The attached “PR4_PET_ModFiles_20130410.zip” file contains the emissions inventory used for 

the risk modeling of the Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate) Resin Production (PET) source category.

PR4_PET_ModFiles_2

0130410.zip

The attached “PR4_PS_ModFiles_20130410.zip” file contains the emissions inventory used for 

the risk modeling of the Polystyrene Resin Production (PS) source category.

PR4_PS_ModFiles_20

130410.zip

The attached “PR4_SAN_ModFiles_20130410.zip” file contains the emissions inventory used 

for the risk modeling of the Styrene Acrylonitrile Resin Production (SAN) source category.

PR4_SAN_ModFiles_

20130410.zip
#### CITY OF HOUSTON, Texas, Appellant, v. Lee DYKES et al., Appellees.

No. 7682.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Nov. 30, 1965.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 28, 1965.

John Wildenthal, Jr., Homer T. Bouldin, Houston, for appellant.

Ed S. Atkinson, Theo. R. Kirchheimer, Houston, for appellees.

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This is an injunction suit. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and rendered.

*826Bayou Woods, Section 3, a platted residential subdivision, was annexed to the City of Houston, Texas, by Ordinance on December 30, 1949. A platted thoroughfare originally designated as Chatsworth Street in Bayou Woods Subdivision 3 was, after annexation, renamed Buckingham Drive. A segment of Buckingham Drive between Kennilworth Street and Katy Road was not before annexation actually open and used as a street. Nor has it since been developed or opened as a street by the City. The City Council heard, but took no affirmative action on numerous requests to open the area for street purposes. Sewer and water lines have been laid under the segment; and there is evidence in the record that the area could have been negotiated on foot and perhaps by motor vehicles previous to 1948 or 1949. Appellees Lee Dykes and Robinwood Lodge, Inc., own lots abutting on this segment of Buckingham Drive. The segment appears as a matter of law to be a dedicated but unopened street area.

Lee Dykes without the consent of the City of Houston attempted to clear the surface of this area and open it to use as a traffic thoroughfar'e. After considerable public controversy the City erected a metal barricade which effectively obstructs and prevents the use of the street segment by ordinary traffic. The relief appellees Lee Dykes and Robinwood Lodge, Inc., prayed for as plaintiffs was:

> “ * * * a mandatory injunction requiring the said City of Houston to remove the barricade erected by the said City on or about August 5, 1962, on Buckingham Drive between Kennil-worth Drive and Katy Road and that said City of Houston be enjoined from further obstructing or interferring with the use of Buckingham Drive unless the said action of the said City be in conformity with the laws and the statutes of the State of Texas * * *

Dykes and Robinwood Lodge, Inc., as abutting lot owners have no jus-ticiable interest warranting injunctive relief in abating an obstruction of the dedicated but unopened street area. Town of Refugio v. Strauch, 29 S.W.2d 1041 (Com.App. 1930). A municipality, as the public’s representative, is empowered to take possession and open for use dedicated street areas whenever the progress and development of the city requires such action. City of Corsicana v. Zorn, 97 Tex. 317, 78 S.W. 924 (1904); Town of Refugio v. Strauch, 29 S.W.2d 1041 (Com.App.1930); see also City of Laredo v. DeMorena (Tex.Civ. App.) 183 S.W. 827. Whether or not progress and development requires that Buckingham Drive be opened is a question that is not reached by this record.

The decree of the trial court is reversed and judgment rendered that appellees Dykes and Robinwood Lodge, Inc., take nothing by their suit.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Hanmi Financial Corporation; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report.
 Date: November 18, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Jay S. YooJay S. YooPresident and Chief Executive Officer
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 9, 2005
|----------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---