SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: West Virginia Department of Environment al Protection

Date Submitted: December 6 , 2012 Subject: Redesignation R equest s and Maintenance Plan s fo r the Charleston, W est V irginia Nonattainment Area , With

Respect to the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

Completeness Review Completed by: Rose Quinto Date Completed: February 4, 2013

Adminis trative Materials ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. Submittal l etter dated December 6 , 2012 from West Virgi nia Department of Environmental Protection Secretary Randy C. Huffman, to Shawn M

. Garvin, Regional Admin i strator

, EPA Region 3

. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, con sent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 2. Not applicable. Not a regulatory change

- the submittal are

requ est s for redesign ation and maintenance plans for the 1997

and 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS, and for the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS base

year emissions i nventory approval

. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. The plan states that it has the necessary legal authority and necessary resources to enforce its rules or permit provisions on which the plan is based. X2

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporatio n by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indica ting that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 4. Not applicable , see 2 above. X

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the proce dural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. The submittal included documentation showing that the State followed State procedural and administrative requirements in issuing the plan. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. A n otice of public hearing and a public comment period was published in the Charle ston Gazette and the West V irginia Reg ister

, both dated October 26, 2012. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. A tr anscript of the public hearing showed the public hearing

was held in acco rdance with the public notice. The December 6, 2012 submittal letter certifies that the public hearing required by 40 CFR 51.102 was held in accordance with state laws and the requir ements of 40 CFR 51.102(d). X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response

thereto. 8. The submittal included a compilation of comments received and the responses to the comments. X3

Technical Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBM ITTAL

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Chapter 1 of the Redesignation Request and Maintenance

Plan show that NOx, SO 2 and PM 2.5 are the pollutants affected by the plan. X

2. Identification of the locat ions of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Kanawha and Putnam Counties in West Virginia. X

3. Quantification of the changes i n plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result

of the revision. 3. Detailed information on the point, area , nonroad and mobile source emissions estimates used in the request s for redesignation and the main tenance plan s f or the 1997 and

2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS , and the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS base year emissions inventory for the Charleston Area are provided in

the submittal. X

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significan t deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. West Virginia has developed a base year (2005 ) and projected (2018 and 2025 ) emissions invent ories showing

continued attainment of the PM 2.5 NAAQS during the plan period

. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data use d, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. Not applicable. X4

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission lim itations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6. Not applicable. X

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels

. 7. Based on permanent and enforceable measures, West Virginia has projected emissions inventories for interim year 2018 and out year 2025 to demonstrate maint enance throughout the entire 10

- year period. X

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, in cluding how compliance will be determined in practice. 8 . Identified c ontingency measures will be implemented if the

Area violates or exceeds the PM 2.5 standard. These measures

are intended to bring the area back to attainment of the

standard

. X

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 9. N ot applicable.

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating maintenan ce to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Maintenance Plan s for both 1997 and 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS

were submitted to EPA Region III on December 6 , 2012

. These plan s demonstrate maintenance for 20 18 through 2025

. X