alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED 12-31-96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                              0000726512
<NAME>                                             SCIOS INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                   1,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                         1,587
<SECURITIES>                                                  60,583
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  4,808
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              14,069
<PP&E>                                                        66,263
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (29,424)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               113,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         19,907
<BONDS>                                                          349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                          37
<OTHER-SE>                                                    93,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 113,961
<SALES>                                                       38,189
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              64,223
<CGS>                                                         22,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 86,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               3,650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (18,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (18,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (18,403)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.51)
        



</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1555 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to limit the number of 

Urban Area Security Initiative grants awarded and to clarify the risk 

assessment formula to be used when making such grants, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2011 

Mrs. LOWEY (for herself and Mr. ISRAEL) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to limit the 

number of Urban Area Security Initiative grants awarded and to clarify the risk assessment formula to be 

used when making such grants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTION AND AWARDING OF URBAN 

4 AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE GRANTS. 

5 (a) LIMITATION ON NUMBER OF URBAN AREA SECU6 RITY INITIATIVE GRANTS.—Section 2003(b)(1) of the 

7 Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 604(b)(1)) is 


sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1555 IH

1 amended by inserting ‘‘not more than 25’’ after ‘‘des2 ignate’’. 

3 (b) RISK ASSESSMENT FORMULA.—The Homeland 

4 Security Act of 2002 is amended— 

5 (1) in section 2003(b)(2)(A) (6 U.S.C. 

6 604(b)(2)(A)), in the matter preceding clause (i), by 

7 inserting ‘‘, in accordance with section 2007(c),’’ 

8 after ‘‘shall conduct’’; and 

9 (2) in section 2007 (6 U.S.C. 608)— 

10 (A) in subsection (a)(1), in the matter pre11 ceding subparagraph (A), by inserting ‘‘in ac12 cordance with subsection (c)’’ after ‘‘terrorism’’; 

13 and 

14 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

15 subsection: 

16 ‘‘(c) RISK ASSESSMENT FORMULA.—In allocating the 

17 funds referred to in subsection (a), the Administrator 

18 shall, when weighing considerations of threat, vulner19 ability, and consequences from acts of terrorism, assign 

20 a percentage value that is not less than 33.’’. 

21 (c) CLARIFICATION OF MINIMUM ALLOCATION TO

22 APPLY ONLY TO STATE HOMELAND SECURITY

23 GRANTS.—Clauses (iv) and (v) of section 2004(e)(1)(A) 

24 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 


sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1555 IH

1 605(e)(1)(A)) are amended by striking ‘‘and section 

2 2003’’ each place it appears. 

3 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act (and the amend4 ments made by this Act) shall take effect on the date of 

5 the enactment of this Act and shall apply to grants made 

6 on or after such date. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK69SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.4

                               AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
                           CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT, dated January 21, 2003, to that certain Change in Control Agreement,
dated June 5, 2000 (the "Agreement"), by and between eFunds Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Colleen M. Adstedt (the "Executive").

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have previously entered into the
Agreement; and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has requested that the Agreement
be amended as hereinafter set forth and the Executive has agreed to so amend the
Agreement.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

1.    Amendment.

      Section 5(A)(1)(b)(i) of the Agreement is amended to delete the word
"three" appearing therein and substitute the word "two" therefor. Section
5(A)(1)(c) is amended to delete the word "three" appearing in the first line
thereof and substitute the word "two" therefor.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hand as of the date
first above written.

                                          eFunds Corporation


                                          By:   /s/ Paul F. Walsh
                                                ------------------------
                                                Paul F. Walsh
                                                Chairman and Chief
                                                Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Colleen M. Adstedt
                                                ------------------------
                                                Executive
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Destination Television, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Scott Venters, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: September 22, 2008

|   | /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |
|   | Gordon Scott Venters,      President and Chief Executive Officer      (principal executive officer) and      Acting Chief Financial Officer      (principal financial officer and      principal accounting officer) |
|        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7298

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CATALINO BENITEZ-VALLEJO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-99-121, CA-00-1061-1)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catalino Benitez-Vallejo, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Hale Levin,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Catalino Benitez-Vallejo seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Benitez-Vallejo has not made a substantial showing of the denial of

a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S.Ct. 1029

(U.S. Feb. 25, 2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
herewith.

                          Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and
                        Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
                                (the "Companies")

                  Written Statement by Chief Financial Officer
              Pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that the Companies' Form 10-Q
periodic report containing their respective financial statements for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that information contained in
that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Companies as of that date.





/s/ Leonard A. Campanaro
--------------------------------
Leonard A. Campanaro
Chief Financial Officer
Armstrong Holdings, Inc. and
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.


Dated: August 8, 2002
#### R. H. TUDOR, Petitioner, v. V. E. TUDOR, Respondent.

No. A-6842.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 11, 1958.

Rehearing Denied July 9,1958.

*794Nelson & McCleskey, Harold O. Harri-ger, Lubbock, for petitioner.

Calloway Huffaker and Harold Green, Tahoka, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Court of Civil, Appeals is published in 311 S.W.2d 733, 738.

Both parties filed applications for writs of error. , The only error of law that we find in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals is in its statement of the rule governing the Court of Civil Appeals in passing upon the question of whether the answer of the jury to a special issue is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. In passing upon that question the Court of Civil Appeals held that “ * * * in order to test the sufficiency of the evidence to determine if it will support the jury findings, we must give credence only to the evidence and circumstances favorable to the findings and disregard all evidence to the contrary, indulging every legitimate conclusion which tends to uphold such findings.” That holding is in direct conflict with a prior opinion and decision of this court in In re King’s Estate, 150 Tex. 662, 244 S.W.2d 660. Had the point been brought forward in an application for writ of error, then it would have been our duty to remand the cause to the Court of Civil Appeals for the consideration of that question upon the correct rule of law. However, there is no point challenging the correctness of the rule followed by the Court of Civil Appeals, and we cannot, therefore, reverse that holding.

This memorandum is written to emphasize again to courts of civil appeals the correct rule of law to be applied in passing upon the above question.
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

K.J. BRUBAKER, A.Y. MARKS, T.P. BELSKY

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

NICHOLAS ESHUN

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201500288

GENERAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 16 June 2015.

Military Judge: Col D.J. Daugherty, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding General, 3d Marine Logistics 

Group, Okinawa, Japan.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: Maj M.C Evans, USMC.

For Appellant: Maj Jason L. Morris, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

14 January 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted without 

assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as 

approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of 

Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 For the Court 

 R.H. TROIDL 

 Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 39 THROUGH 41 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,048,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  131,554
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,750
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,318,717
<PP&E>                                       6,985,062
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,615,751
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,168,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,043,024
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          268,538
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,004
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,969,045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,168,549
<SALES>                                      9,234,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,234,097
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,568,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               656,239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             317,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (990,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (993,653)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,551,488
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,350,418
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tvia, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I, Eli Porat, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that based on my knowledge:

        (1)
        the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
        certification is attached as an exhibit (the "Report"), fully complies
        with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

        (2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.

Dated: November 11, 2002                /s/   ELI PORAT
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Eli Porat
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1495

RAYMOND ROMIG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MONTGOMERY COUNTY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:21-cv-01475)

Submitted: September 13, 2024 Decided: October 3, 2024

Before AGEE and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: John M. Shoreman, MCFADDEN & SHOREMAN, Washington, D.C., for 

Appellant. John P. Markovs, County Attorney, Edward B. Lattner, Deputy County 

Attorney, Matthew H. Johnson, Associate County Attorney, Erin J. Ashbarry, Associate 

County Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1495 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Romig appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm the district court’s order. Romig v. Montgomery Cnty., No. 8:21-cv-01475-TDC 

(D. Md. Mar. 31, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1495 Doc: 17 Filed: 10/03/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

Certifications pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14 as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

      I, Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of Capital Gold
Corporation (the "Company") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
Registrant and I have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

Date: November 12,  2003


/s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
-----------------------
Gifford A. Dieterle
Chief Executive Officer


                                       1