alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1362 

To ensure that members of the Armed Forces continue to receive their 

pay and allowances despite a shutdown of the Federal Government and 

in the event that the debt of the United States Government reaches 

the statutory limit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 4, 2011 

Mr. YODER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation 

and Infrastructure and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To ensure that members of the Armed Forces continue to 

receive their pay and allowances despite a shutdown of 

the Federal Government and in the event that the debt 

of the United States Government reaches the statutory 

limit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONTINUATION OF PAY AND ALLOWANCES FOR 

4 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES. 

5 (a) CONTINUATION DURING ANY FEDERAL GOVERN6 MENT SHUTDOWN.—From amounts in the general fund 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1362 IH

1 of the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the Secretary 

2 of the Treasury shall transfer to the Secretary of Defense 

3 (and the Secretary of Homeland Security in the case of 

4 the Coast Guard) such amounts as are necessary to pro5 vide pay and allowances to members of the Armed Forces, 

6 including reserve component members, who perform active 

7 service during any funding gap during fiscal year 2011 

8 when interim or full-year appropriations for the personnel 

9 accounts of the Armed Forces have not been enacted. 

10 (b) CONTINUATION DESPITE REACHING STATUTORY

11 DEBT LIMIT.—Members of the Armed Forces, including 

12 reserve component members, shall continue to be paid 

13 their pay and allowances even if the debt of the United 

14 States Government, as defined in section 3101 of title 31, 

15 United States Code, reaches the statutory limit. The obli16 gation of the Secretary of Defense (and the Secretary of 

17 Homeland Security in the case of the Coast Guard) to pro18 vide such pay and allowances shall take priority over all 

19 other obligations incurred by the Government of the 

20 United States. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INFORMEDICS, INC. INCORPORATED INTO ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                       1
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         207,692
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  462,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,200
<INVENTORY>                                      3,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               814,570
<PP&E>                                         862,933
<DEPRECIATION>                                 737,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,180,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,445,793
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,546
<OTHER-SE>                                    (291,593)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,180,746
<SALES>                                        671,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,249,785
<CGS>                                          137,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,857,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (569,160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   721,743
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,290,903)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,290,903)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.49)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45011-45012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17634]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending June 29, 2013

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0123.

[[Page 45012]]

    Date Filed: June 27, 2013.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: July 18, 2013.
    Description: Application of Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. (``Pinnacle'') 
requesting registration of name change and reissuance of Pinnacle's 
certificates of public convenience and necessity in the name of 
``ENDEAVOR AIR, INC.''.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-17634 Filed 7-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier: 2013** 

**- NM** 
**- 105** 

**- AD** 

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Nalion~1 HU'iincss Aircraft A.ssociatiOIl Eli Cotti

, -

nl'gionai /\iriinc Associ;lIioll O~l\'C Lotterer

...

Ain:l'art Ownel's & !'iluts Association Robert Hackman ,

J

,

ATA Cr:dg Fabian

,.\TA M Lopez

,

09129/06
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Take A Ride, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| /s/ Anthony DeMint                                       |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 9, 2005
bioc-ex43_269.pptx.htm






 COMMON STOCK Biocept NUMBER INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SHARES SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 09072V 20 4 THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.0001 PAR VALUE, OF BIOCEPT, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. Dated: COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE /s/ Timothy Kennedy (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF OPERATIONS AND CORPORATE SECRETARY) /s/ Michael W. Nall (PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)  Exhibit 4.3







 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM = as tenants in common TEN ENT = as tenants by entireties JT TEN = as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common UTMA = (Cust) Custodian (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated X X NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGE MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
#### Ex parte Ignacio ARREDONDO.

No. 30497.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 25, 1959.

Ralph L. Bell, San Antonio, for appellant.

Charles J. Lieck, Jr., Dist. Atty., Roy H. Garwood, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

■ On November 5, 1958, appellant was found guilty of the unlawful possession of marijuana, and his punishment was assessed by a jury at twenty years.

On November 12, 1958, his attorney applied for writ of habeas corpus alleging that his client was held in jail by virtue of said conviction and was afflicted with tuberculosis which rendered his removal from jail necessary for the preservation of his life.

After hearing the application was denied and appellant was remanded to the custody of the sheriff. This is an appeal from said order.

Counsel for appellant represents that he will be compelled to abandon his' appeal from the conviction for sale of marijuana if his client is required to remain in jail, in order to save his life, there being adequate facilities in the Department of Correction for his treatment "and care. He relies upon Art. 137, C.C.P.

It has been held that “legal custody” referred to in Art. 137,- C.C.P., does not con-témplate release after conviction of a felony. Ex parte Smith, Tex.Cr.App., 64 S.W. 1052.

There is no showing in this record that an appeal has been taken in the marijuana case. No such appeal is found on this Court’s records.

. If so, Art. 815, C.C.P., requires that appellant remain in custody in order for this Court to have jurisdiction of the appeal. If that case is still pending on the docket of the trial court; then Art. 699, C.C.P., requires that the defendant shall remain in *845custody to await the further action of the court.

Another rule here applicable is stated in Ex parte Shacklett, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 217, 241 S.W.2d 849: “Where the confinement is after conviction, it must be shown that *any*confinement would endanger the life of the prisoner before he is entitled to release.”

The trial judge’s order remanding appellant was authorized under the authorities above cited.

’Our holding does not preclude appellant’s safekeeping by the Department of Correction pending an appeal from his conviction for possessing marijuana, should the trial judge so order.

The judgment is affirmed.
## THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OR? TEXAS AUSTIN. TEXAS

Hon. L. A. Wood State Superintendent Opinion No. V-737 Departmentof Education Re: The legality ofpaying the Austin, Texas expenses of State business travelwhen the employee also attends a Convention meeting in the evening. Dear Sir:
Your request for an opinionupon the above subjectmatter is as follows:

"On October 31 Dr. H. E. Robinson went to Waco at the request of several individuals to assistwith special educationproblems in their schools. He was involved in eight or ten such individual conferences from noon on the 31st until noon on November 1. He did not go to Waco to attend a convention,but at 7:30 p.m. on October 31 he did attend a meeting at which Dr. John Lee of Wayne University spoke to a group on "What Is Special Education?" I feel that attending thismeeting at an eveninghour does not invalidatehis claim for expenses for transactingnecessary official business."I am enclosing a copy of his expense account claims covering the details of this situation and would appreciateyour opinion as towhether or not he is entitled to reimbursement for his expenses incurred."
Dr. Robinson's accountmay be approved for payment. The State has a just claimupon the working hours of its employees,but it is not monitor of their evenings. The prohibition againstpaying travel expenses of employees to conventionsdoes not operate toHon. ,L.A. Wood - Page 2 (V-737)

forbidpayment when the employee in fact is traveling on State business, notwithstanding,while upon such trip he does actually attend a convention. Each case such as you put presents a questionof fact as to good faith discharge of the State'sbusiness. It is primarily the duty of thehead of thedepartment, and the issuance and payment of warrant by the accounting officers of the State to solve such questions. We may add, however, that the nature of thebusiness transacted, and the characterof the conventionattendedmay be considered in this fact finding as to good faith intention.
It is within your power and officialdiscretion to approve the claim involved.

A State employeemay lawfully be paid travel expense incurred in making a trip in good faithupon State business,notmithstanding in the evening ho attends a convention.
Yours very truly, ATTOiWEY qGERE.XAL OF TEXAS

0S:wb 

# By

5%$Yk&+

Assistant
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D., the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Telik, Inc. (the Company), and Cynthia M. Butitta, the Chief Operating Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, his or her knowledge:



1.The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations.



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 5thday of May, 2004.



|                                     |  |  |  |                                                     |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ MICHAEL M. WICK                  |  |  |  | /s/ CYNTHIA M. BUTITTA                             
|Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D.         |  |  |  | Cynthia M. Butitta                                 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This certification
accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6439

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FRANKLYN EARL BANNERMAN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-105-N, CA-97-287-2) Submitted: August 10, 1999 Decided: August 31, 1999Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James J. Vergara, Jr., VERGARA & ASSOCIATES, Hopewell, Virginia; Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. LauraMarie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Franklyn Earl Bannerman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bannerman , No. CR-90-105-N; CA-97-287-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1

[LETTERHEAD
OF SPECTOR & WONG, LLP]

CONSENT OF HAROLD Y SPECTOR  INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

I
consent to the use of my report dated October 16, 2002, on the financial statements of PurchaseSoft, Inc. as of May 31, 2002 included herein and to the reference made to me.

I
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of the aforementioned report and to the use of my name as it appears under the option "Experts".

/s/
Harold Y Spector, CPA
Pasadena, California
October 23, 2002

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1

                                   Exhibit 21
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

     The following is a list of all subsidiaries of First Equity Properties,
Inc., the state or other jurisdiction of organization or incorporation and the
names under which such subsidiaries do business (indention means direct parent
relationship):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Jurisdiction of
                                                       Organization or
          Name of Entity                                Incorporation
--------------------------------------------           ---------------

<S>                                                         <C>
First Equity Properties, Inc.*                            Nevada
     Carmel Realty, Inc.                                     Texas
          Regis Management                                  Nevada
          Corporation (formerly
          Williamsburg Management
          Corporation)
</TABLE>

----------------

     * First Equity Properties, Inc. is also the holder of a 81.6% limited 
partner interest in Carmel Realty Services, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership.
Exhibit 99.2 (a)
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
        Center Tower
        650 Town Center Drive
        Costa Mesa, CA  92626





                 INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

                                
A.   The Board of Directors
Option One Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Option One Mortgage
Corporation's (the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing
standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
performing such other procedures, as we considered necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not
provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Option One Mortgage
Corporation complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


\s\ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


February 18, 1997