alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC) will hold a public meeting via telephone conference line on Wednesday, March 20, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Mr. Alec Johnston, Office of National Public Liaison, at (202) 317-4299, or send an email to                         *publicliaison@irs.gov*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a public meeting via conference call of the ETAAC will be held on Wednesday, March 20, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. EDT. The purpose of the ETAAC is to provide continuing advice regarding the development and implementation of the IRS organizational strategy for electronic tax administration. ETAAC is an organized public forum for discussion of electronic tax administration issues such as prevention of identity theft and refund fraud. It supports the overriding goal that paperless filing should be the preferred and most convenient method of filing tax and information returns. ETAAC members convey the public's perceptions of IRS electronic tax administration activities, offer constructive observations about current or proposed policies, programs, and procedures, and suggest improvements. Please call or email Alec Johnston to confirm your attendance. Mr. Johnston can be reached at 202-317-4299 or                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov*. Should you wish the ETAAC to consider a written statement, please call 202-317-4299 or email:                     *PublicLiaison@irs.gov.*

Dated: February 6, 2024.

John A. Lipold,

Designated Federal Official, Office of National Public Liaison, Internal Revenue Service.

[FR Doc. 2024-02726 Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 99.2

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
            UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of E-Z-EM,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
            ended June 1, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date  August 29, 2002                      /s/ Dennis J. Curtin
    -------------------                   ------------------------------------
                                           Dennis J. Curtin, Senior Vice
                                           President - Chief Financial Officer


                                      -88-
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No.’s 333-53928 and333-99641) and Form S-8 (File No.’s 333-35201, 333-56269, 333-60412, 333-64052, 333-82820 and 333-99227) of Scios Inc. of our report dated February 7, 2003, except as to Note 20, which is as of February 10, 2003, relating to theconsolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

March 14, 2003
NUMBER 13-20-00573-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

IN RE ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Relator Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company (Allstate) filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus and an emergency motion for temporary relief and stay in the abovereferenced cause. Allstate asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in denying 

Allstate’s motion to quash the deposition of its corporate representative and it lacks an 

adequate remedy by appeal. Allstate requests that we issue an order staying the 

December 23, 2020 order requiring Allstate to proceed with the deposition and the 

deposition itself, which is currently scheduled for January 6, 2021. 
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the emergency motion for 

temporary relief, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we ORDER the 

December 23, 2020 order allowing the deposition, and the deposition itself, to be 

STAYED pending further order of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10. The Court 

requests that the real parties in interest, Larissa Ann Cantu and Julia Gonzales Fuentes, 

or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response 

to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date 

of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

4th day of January, 2021.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
TRUST'S  AUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER  31,  1997  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000726593
<NAME>                        Capital Industries Liquidating Trust
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         78,759
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               78,759
<PP&E>                                         317,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 911,831
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,677
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               (135,079)
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               43,549
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (178,628)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


 


The
undersigned, being the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of ADB Systems International Ltd. (the “Company”) do each hereby
certify that:


 


(1) The Annual
Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.


 


(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as at, and for
the fiscal year ended on, December 31, 2003.


 


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


 


 


	
  Dated: June
  29, 2004

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  C/s Jeffrey Lymburner

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Jeffrey
  Lymburner

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Dated: June
  29, 2004

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  C/s Michael Robb

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Michael Robb

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Annual Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gifford A.
      Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





****/s/ Gifford
              A. DieterleGifford
              A. DieterleChief
              Executive OfficerOctober
                22, 2007
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

May 23,2005

 

In connection with the Large Scale Biology CorporationQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Kevin J. Ryan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Large Scale BiologyCorporation for the fiscal period covered by the Report.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Kevin J. Ryan                     |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Kevin J. Ryan                         |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | Large Scale Biology Corporation       |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I,Donald C. Grenesko, the Senior Vice President/Finance and Administration ofTribune Company, certify that (i) Tribune Company’s Form 10-K for theyear ended Dec. 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 30, 2007 fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results ofoperations of Tribune Company.

 
|   | /s/ DONALD C. GRENESKO     |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Donald C. Grenesko         |
|   | Senior Vice President/     |
|   | Finance and Administration |
|   |                       |
|   | March 20, 2008        |

 

1

----
# COGNIGEN
NETWORKS, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Cognigen Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Gary L. Cook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Gary L. CookGary L. CookChief Financial OfficerSeptember 7, 2005
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------

---
NO. 12-15-00246-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE 

OF WILLIE SUE HAMMACK, 

DECEASED

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE

COUNTY COURT AT LAW

NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in this case was signed on June 25, 2015. 

Appellants timely filed a notice of appeal that failed to contain the information required by Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all 

parties to the trial court's judgment.

On September 29, 2015, Appellants were notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rules 9.5 and 

25.1(e). Appellants were further notified that unless they filed an amended notice of appeal on 

or before October 9, 2015, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(c). The deadline for filing an amended notice of appeal has passed, and Appellants

have not corrected their defective notice of appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for 

failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); 

Feist v. Berg, No. 12-04-00004-CV, 2004 WL 252785, at *1 (Tex. App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, 

pet. denied) (mem. op.); Feist v. Hubert, No. 12-03-00442-CV, 2004 WL 252285, at *1 (Tex. 

App.-Tyler Feb. 11, 2004, pet. denied) (mem. op.).

Opinion delivered October 21, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

OCTOBER 21, 2015

NO. 12-15-00246-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF

WILLIE SUE HAMMACK, DECEASED

Appeal from the County Court at Law 

of Nacogdoches County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. PB 14-12226)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

*Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*

In connection with the Annual Report of Auto Underwriters of America, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report), Dean Antonis, as Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,that:

| (1)    | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                         |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                             |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Dean Antonis                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Dean Antonis                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Date:  October 12, 2005                                                                                                                                                                                |

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 17

- 00448

- CV

IN RE CONTINENTAL MO TORS, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2017

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 13, 2017

, R elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and “Emergency Motion

for Immediate Temporary Relief

. ” The court has considered R elator’s petition for writ of

mandamus and is of the opinion that R elator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for temporary relief are denied. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016CI18283, styled Danbury Aerospace, Inc., et al

. v. Continental Motors,

Inc. , pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Norma Gonzales presiding.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 29, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-850

Lower Tribunal No. 11-40524

________________

Kendall Commercial Associates, LLC, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.

Drakes, LLC, et. al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Gladys Perez,

Judge.

McDonald Hopkins and Alan M. Burger and Mary F. April (West Palm

Beach), for appellant.

Erik D. Diener (Plantation); Richard A. Sherman, Sr. and James W.

Sherman (Fort Lauderdale); Wolpe, Leibowitz & Fernandez, LLP, and Joel R.

Wolpe, for appellees.

Before SALTER, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

FERNANDEZ, J.

Kendall Commercial Associates, LLC, etc., appeals the trial court’s order

entering summary judgment in favor of Drake’s, LLC and seven individual
guarantors on all counts of Kendall’s amended counterclaim in the underlying

landlord-tenant action. We reverse because the trial court granted relief that was

neither sought in the summary judgment motion nor noticed for hearing. 

The order on appeal granted summary judgment on the amended

counterclaim in favor of the tenant, Drake’s, LLC, and in favor of seven

guarantors/third-party defendants. However, the motion for summary judgment

filed by Drake’s, LLC only sought relief on behalf of Drake’s, LLC. Because there

was no notice to Kendall, the landlord, that relief was being sought on behalf of the

guarantors, and the trial court granted relief not pled or sought in Drake’s, LLC’s

motion, we reverse the order granting summary judgment as to the guarantors. See

Hotel 71 Mezz Lender, LLC v. Tutt, 66 So. 3d 1051 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011).

We additionally dismiss the remainder of this appeal for lack of jurisdiction,

as the remaining portion of the order on appeal is not an appealable partial final

judgment under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k).

Reversed in part and remanded; appeal dismissed in part.

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WARREN EARL YERGER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 514 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#### The Cleveland Trust Co., Appellant, *v.*Wittich et al., Appellees.

(No. 27637

Decided June 21, 1939.)

*Messrs. Cummings, Mook, Strong <& Douglas*and *Mr. E. W. Eopf,*for appellant.

*Messrs. McKeehan, Merrick, Arter & Stewart*and *Mr. George William Cottrell,*for Sarah J. Sauerwine, appellee.

*Mr. Walter I. Krewson,*for Lydia M. Wittich, Exrx., appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### Hershell WIDEMON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28817.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 13, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, 30 days in jail.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.