alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer
of Zkid Network Company, (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge,  the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the Company for the period
ended June 30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  and  that
information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,
the  financial  condition  and results of  operation  of the  Company.  A signed
original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has been provided to
the  registrant  and will be retained by it and furnished to the  Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated August 12, 2003.                                  /s/ Jon Darmstadter
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        Jon Darmstadter
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) and**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**


**ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO**




Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
      connection with the filing by Wincroft, Inc. (the "Company") of the Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the "Report"),
      I,
      Danny Wettreich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


*Dated:
                July 16, 2007*
            
            */s/
                Bartly J. Loethen**Bartly
                J. Loethen**Chief
                Financial Officer*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         119,851
<SECURITIES>                                    89,607
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,840
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,520
<INVENTORY>                                    883,125
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,263,249
<PP&E>                                       1,528,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                 996,810
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,846,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          195,746
<BONDS>                                        105,656
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        59,768
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,545,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,846,598
<SALES>                                      1,953,521
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,964,705
<CGS>                                          990,626
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  995,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               219,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (259,246)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,050
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (262,296)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (262,296)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.44)


</TABLE>
#### Homer FITCH, Appellant, v. Sarah Francis FITCH, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 27, 1956.

Harrington & Jones, Marvin D. Jones, Paintsville, for appellant.,

Woodrow W. Burchett, Prestonsburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Sarah Francis Fitch sought a divorce, alimony, and restoration of certain property in an action against Homer Fitch. A counterclaim was filed and a divorce was granted to the husband. The wife was denied alimony but recovered judgment for $750 for restoration of property under KRS 403.065.

Appellant complains on appeal that the judgment for $750 was not sufficiently sustained by proof. We have examined the record and find no error with respect to the *525finding of fact and judgment of the lower court. CR 52.01; Todd v. Todd, Ky., 269 S.W.2d 282.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# TIME AND DATE: 

3 p.m. on Friday, February 9, 2024.

# PLACE: 

The meeting was held via video conference on the internet.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The Special Review Committee of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met to consider matters related to the Corporation's corporate activities within its authority to act on behalf of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In calling the meeting, the Special Review Committee determined, by the unanimous vote of Director Jonathan P. McKernan and Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2),(c)(4), and (c)(6) of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2),(c)(4), and (c)(6)).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

Dated February 9, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James P. Sheesley,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-03109 Filed 2-9-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 11841]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03113]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Initial 
Review Group; Effectiveness of Mental Health Interventions Study 
Section.
    Date: March 12-13, 2024.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Claudio Dario Ortiz, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 240-869-9245, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#086b64697d6c616726677a7c617248666160266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ceada2afbbaaa7a1e0a1bcbaa7b48ea0a7a6e0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Mental Health Services Research Not Involving 
Clinical Trials.
    Date: March 15, 2024.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-9608, 301-443-1225, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e3f2d3d362b322a3b1e333f37327030373670393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="224351414a574e5647624f434b4e0c4c4b4a0c454d54">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 9, 2024.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-03113 Filed 2-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Howard Alonzo PARKS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29938.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1958.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $50.

Highway Patrolman Perkins testified that, while on patrol on the night in question, an automobile passed him at a high rate of speed, that he turned around, gave chase, observed the automobile weave across the center line and then off on the shoulder, and brought it to a halt. He stated that the appellant who was the driver staggered, leaned up against his automobile, his face was flushed, his eyes were dilated, his speech was incoherent, his breath smelled of alcohol, and expressed the opinion that he was intoxicated. Perkins testified that he arrested the appellant, carried him to Eden, where he and Mr. Atwood, a deputy sheriff, placed the appellant in jail

Atwood testified that the appellant smelled of intoxicants, staggered when he walked, spoke with a thick tongue, and expressed the opinion that he was intoxicated.

The appellant did not testify in his own behalf but called a number of witnesses who testified as to his good reputation.

There are no bills of exception in the record.

Finding the evidence sufficient to support the verdict and no reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
#### Ex parte Ollie NASH.

No. 38296.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 12, 1965.

Ollie Nash, in pro. per.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding originally instituted in this Court attack*958ing petitioner s conviction and life sentence for swindling over $50 (Art. 63 P.C.) in Hardin County on January 11, 1938 as void for the reason that he was an indigent and had no counsel.

A similar petition complaining that he was not represented by counsel was denied on January 6, 1958, under authority of Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, 62 S.Ct. 1252, 86 L.Ed. 1595, and Parsons v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 218 S.W.2d 202.

Petitioner relies upon Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, decided in 1963, which specifically overruled Betts v. Brady.

The undisputed facts showing that appellant, an indigent, was tried without counsel and without waiving his right to counsel, petitioner is entiled to relief under the Supreme Court’s holding in Gideon v. Wainwright, supra.

The writ is granted; petitioner is ordered released from further confinement under the life sentence in Cause No. 3775 in District Court of Hardin County and it is ordered that he be remanded to custody of the Sheriff of Hardin County to answer the indictment in said cause.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tvia, Inc. (the Registrant) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, Arthur Nguyen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that based on my knowledge: (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant. Dated: August 6, 2004
    
    /s/ Arthur NguyenArthur NguyenChief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gerald Lau, President and Chief Executive
Officer, and Eddie Chou, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technology Officer,
Secretary and Treasurer of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc., hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biopack
      Environmental Solutions Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc.                                                                 

Dated: May 15, 2008

/s/ Gerald Lau Gerald Lau,
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



/s/ Eddie Chou Eddie Chou
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technology Officer, Secretary and
Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Biopack
Environmental Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Biopack Environmental
Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains a summary of financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet and Condensed Consolidated Statement of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         386,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,533,313
<ALLOWANCES>                                    79,980
<INVENTORY>                                  7,753,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,625,288
<PP&E>                                      32,051,165
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,396,046
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,662,056
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,477,660
<BONDS>                                        100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       258,266
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,662,056
<SALES>                                     47,102,025
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,257,025
<CGS>                                       40,307,894
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               45,826,186
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             351,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,170,302
<INCOME-TAX>                                   386,961
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            770,486
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   770,486
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .61
        

</TABLE>
#### Ex parte Russell E. CUTTRELL.

No. 28204.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 4, 1956.

*774Edgar L. Smith, Albert Reagan, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Harvey Lindsay, George P. Blackburn, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This-is an extradition case.

The Governor of this State issued his executive warrant based upon the requisition and supporting papers of the Governor of the State of Arizona authorizing the arrest, delivery, and return of appellant to the State of Arizona to answer á charge of removing encumbered property from the state without the consent of the vendor (a feiony).

Appellant sought his discharge by a writ of habeas corpus filed in the Criminal District Court of Dallas County, Texas. After a hearing appellant was remanded to the Sheriff of Dallas County for delivery to the agent of the State of Arizona.

The executive warrant of the Governor of this State and accompanying papers were introduced in evidence. They made out a prima.facie case that the accused is a fugitive from justice and subject to extradition.

Appellant, while testifying, admitted purchasing an automobile in Arizona which he had in Dallas at the time of the hearing, but contends that there were certain equities due him on the transaction and that the holder of the title to the car knew where he was.

In determining whether extradition is proper, the merits of the charge of the guilt of the accused cannot be inquired into. Art. 1008a, Sec. 20, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Ex parte Thompson, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 161, 261 S.W.2d 844.

Under the executive warrant of the Governor of this State, the accompanying papers, and the evidence, the trial court was authorized to conclude as he did and remand appellant for extradition.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Vanity Enterprises, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

May 13,2004