alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX 31.1

Certificate of Chief Executive Officer

I, Tim Page, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lions Capital Holdings, Inc. (LCHI)

2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report fairly present, in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of LCHI as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

4.

As LCHIs Chief Executive Officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for LCHI.  As such, LCHI has:

a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to LCHI, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.

evaluated the effectiveness of LCHI's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c.

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.

LCHIs other officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to our auditors and the audit committee of LCHI's board of directors:

a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect LCHI's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for LCHI's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in LCHI's internal controls.

6.

LCHIs other officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

|Date:  November 18, 2004 |  | /s/ Tim Page                                   
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                         |  | Tim Page, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      10.22


**AMENDMENT
      TO EXECUTIVE**


**EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT**




WHEREAS,
      effective July 31, 2006, CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
      (“Employer”), and JEFFREY W. PRITCHARD, a Pennsylvania resident (“Executive”),
      entered into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”);
      and





WHEREAS, on
      August
      29, 2007, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the
      Company’s Board of Directors, after review of an Executive Compensation Market
      Analysis and Report by an independent  human
      resource professional services firm, the Board of Directors increased the
      salaries of our executive officers to be commensurate with industry
      standards ;





NOW,
      THEREFORE, to effectuate the foregoing change in salary for Executive, Employer
      and Executive agree:





1.  Section
      3(a) of the Agreement is amended retroactively effective August 1, 2007 and,
      as
      amended, reads as follows:





(a)  *Base
      Salary* .
      As
      compensation for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Employer
      agrees to pay Executive a base salary at an annual rate of not less than
      $195,000, payable in installments in accordance with Employer’s standard payroll
      practices, subject to such payroll and withholding deductions as are required
      by
      law or authorized by Executive. The amount of the base salary shall be reviewed
      periodically and may be increased at the sole discretion of Employer.





2.  All
      other
      terms of the Agreement remain the same.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment to the Agreement
      effective August 29, 2007.




EMPLOYER
                :


CAPITAL GOLD
                CORPORATIONBy:
              s/ Gifford
                A.
                DieterleGifford
                A. Dieterle, President
 EXECUTIVE:s/ Jeffrey
                W.
                PritchardJeffrey
                W. Pritchard
EX-10.5(A)



 Exhibit 10.5(a) 

June 1, 2016 
 Aspect Capital Ltd. 

10 Portman Square 
 London W1H 6AZ, 

U.K. 
 Attention: Mr. Anthony Todd, CEO 

 

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Todd: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2017 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P 

  

	 	•	 	Global Futures Fund Ltd 

  

	 	•	 	MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036 or fax to 866-428-9026. If you have any questions, I can be
reached at 212-296-6808 or contact Jack Yuen at 212-296-1320. 
 Very truly yours, 

CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 
 By: /s/ Patrick T. Egan 

Patrick T. Egan 
 President and
Director 
 ASPECT CAPITAL LTD. 
 By: /s/ Jonathan
Greenworld 
 Print Name: Jonathan Greenworld 

PE/kg          Company Secretary and Authorised Signatory
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                        273,377
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    0
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                273,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          40,149
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  273,377
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              909,510
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0       
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              374,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            117,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  417,630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### Ex parte Arthur Bert SEE.

No. 27611.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 11, 1955.

IJo attorney on appeal for appellant.

Léon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, . Commissioner.

Appellant here, the relator in the court below, is under four separate indictments for rape.

By writ of habeas corpus, filed in the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, appellant complains of his restraint by virtue of said court’s refusal to grant bail in each of said cases pending trial on said indictments.

Upon a hearing on said writ, the trial court refused bail in three of said cases and granted and fixed bail in the other in the'sum of $1,000 and remanded appellant to the custody of the Sheriff of Jefferson County. From this order refusing bail in said three causes, appellant gave notice of appeal.

We have carefully examined and considered the record and are of the opinion that appellant is entitled to bail. ,.

The judgment denying bail is reversed and bail is granted in each of said cases in the sum of $5,000.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### Ex parte T. H. HENSON.

No. 27618.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 27, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.'

Relator, an inmate of the Texas Prison System, seeks his discharge by writ of ha-beas corpus, alleging that the cumulation of sentences which he is serving is defective.

The facts were developed by the Honorable W. T. McDonald, Judge of the 85th Judicial District, and the writ was made returnable to this Court in -accordance with Article 119, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

From the records forwarded to , .this Court, the following appears.

On July 8, 1948, the relator was found guilty of a felony in Cause No.'4723-BA in the Criminal District Court of Dallas County' and his punishment 'assessed at three years. ' - -

On September 21, 1948, the relator was convicted in causes numbered 8792 and 8796 in the District Court of Brazos County!, The judgment and sentence in Cause No. 8792 contain the following orders:

> "This judgment is cumulative of the term in State penitentiary assessed defendant in District Court of Dallas County.”

> “Time to begin when time in Dallas County case ends.”

The sentence in Cause No. 8796 cumulat-ed it with Cause No. 8792, and relator does not question the validity of this cumulation but .does. question the effectiveness of the *167cumulation with the Dallas County sentence.

We have been furnished with a certificate of the Texas Prison System showing that he has now served the two Brazos County sentences.

In Ex parte Ball, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 382, 235 S.W.2d 652, and Ex parte Merritt, Tex.Cr.App., 261 S.W.2d 596, and Ex parte La Garce, Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 371, we have held that an order such as the one before us here is insufficient.

The writ of habeas corpus is granted, and the relator is ordered discharged from confinement under the above sentences.
June 24, 2004 Amendment No. 2 to General Security Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.33 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 GENERAL SECURITY AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO GENERAL SECURITY AGREEMENT (this “Amendment No. 2”) is dated for reference purposes June 24, 2004, and is made and entered into by and between TULLY’S COFFEE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
(“Debtor”) and KENT CENTRAL, L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company (“Lender”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 A. Debtor and Lender have entered into a General Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated November 1, 2002, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to General Security Agreement dated June 26, 2003 (“Amendment No. 1”; the
Agreement and Amendment No. 1 are herein collectively called the “Security Agreement”) in order to secure Debtor’s repayment of, and performance under, that certain Promissory Note dated November 1, 2002, in the amount of
$2,890,037.09, and all amendments thereto (collectively the “Note”) in favor of Lender. 
  
 B. Debtor and Lender desire to amend the terms of such Security Agreement in certain respects. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual terms, covenants and
conditions, and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Debtor and Lender hereby agree as follows: 
  
 1. Section 1.3.7 of the Security Agreement is deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place:

  

	 	1.3.7	any reference to the “Loan Documents” shall mean, collectively, that certain Promissory Note dated November 1, 2002, in favor of Holder in the original principal amount of
up to TWO MILLION EIGHT HUNDRED NINETY THOUSAND THIRTY SEVEN AND 09/100 DOLLARS ($2,890,037.09) (the “Original Note”), as amended by Amendment to Promissory Note dated March 3, 2003 (“Amendment No. 1”), Amendment No. 2 to
Promissory Note dated June 26, 2003 (“Amendment No. 2) and Amendment No. 3 to Promissory Note dated June 24, 2004 (“Amendment No. 3”; the Original Note, Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3 are collectively herein
called the “Note”); this General Security Agreement and any other instruments or documents evidencing or relating to the foregoing, and all amendments to any of the foregoing, but expressly excluding the Lease Agreement date August 16,
1999 entered into between Lender and Debtor (the “Lease”). 

  
 2. Except as specifically set forth above, the terms and provisions of the Security Agreement shall remain as originally executed by the Debtor and the Lender. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the day and year first above
written. 
  

			
	 DEBTOR:

	
	 TULLY’S COFFEE CORPORATION, a Washington corporation

		
	 By:
	 	

		
	 Name:
	 	

		
	 Title:
	 	

	
	 LENDER:

	
	 KENT CENTRAL, L.L.C., a Washington limited liability company

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Larry R. Benaroya


		
	 Name:
	 	 Larry R. Benaroya


		
	 Title:
	 	 Manager



  

 2
Exhibit 10.16

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

Amount:  $1,000,000.00                                       Date:  May 17, 2002

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Mid-Power Service Corporation
("Borrower"), promises to pay to the order of SCRS Investors, LLC ("Lender") the
principal sum of One Million Dollars and No Cents ($1,000,000.00) with interest
thereon at the rate of nine percent (9%) per annum until May 17, 2004
(maturity).

         All payments shall be paid in lawful money of the United States without
relief from valuation or appraisement laws and with attorney's fees and each
payment shall be credited first to accrued interest then to principal. The
Borrower shall have the right of repaying the entire principal balance at any
time without penalty.

         Interest hereunder shall accrue on the original principal sum of
$1,000,000.00 from the issuance date of this Note, and shall be computed on the
basis of a 365 or 366 day year, as the case may be, and the actual numbers of
days elapsed (including the first day but excluding the last day) during the
period for which such interest is payable.

         The entire principal balance and accrued interest owing thereon shall
become immediately due and payable on May 17, 2004. All past due amounts shall
bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum.

         Maker and all other parties now or hereafter liable for payment hereof,
whether as endorser, guarantor, surety or otherwise, severally waive demand,
presentment, notice of dishonor, notice of default, notice of intent to
accelerate, diligence in collecting, grace, notice and protest and consent to
all extension which from time to time may be granted by the holder hereof and to
all partial payments hereon, whether before or after maturity.

         If this Note is not paid when due, whether at maturity or by
acceleration, or if it is collected through a bankruptcy, probate or other
court, whether before or after maturity, the maker hereof agrees to pay all
costs of collection, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees,
incurred by the holder hereof.

         This Note shall be governed by and interpreted and constructed in
accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada.

         The term "maker" as used herein shall include the undersigned and its
permitted successors and assigns.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this
Note on the date first above written.

                                           /s/ Kenneth M. Emter
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           By: Mid-Power Service Corporation
                                           Kenneth M. Emter, Secretary
**Exhibit
      32.2**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**










In
      connection with the Annual Report of Capital Gold Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher
      Chipman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.







/s/ Christopher
                ChipmanChristopher
                ChipmanChief
                  Financial Officer
                October
                  31, 2006
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-3 and related Prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 1, 1996 in Registration No. 333-7367 of our report, dated
July 10, 1997, except for note 18, as to which the date is August 5, 1997, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Mehl/Biophile International
Corporation and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended May 31, 1997, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                           JOSEPH DECOSIMO AND COMPANY
                           A TENNESSEE REGISTERED LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP


Chattanooga, Tennessee
September 10, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1446 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1446

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for transparency of 
                 payments made from the Judgment Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2011

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to provide for transparency of 
                 payments made from the Judgment Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Judgment Fund Transparency Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. JUDGMENT FUND TRANSPARENCY.

    (a) Transparency Requirement.--Section 1304 of title 31, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(d) The Secretary of the Treasury shall make available to the 
public on a website the following information with regard to any 
payment made under this section, unless the disclosure of such 
information is otherwise prohibited by law or court order:
            ``(1) The name of the plaintiff or claimant.
            ``(2) The name of the counsel for the plaintiff or 
        claimant.
            ``(3) The name of the agency that submitted the claim.
            ``(4) A brief description of the facts that gave rise to 
        the claim.
            ``(5) The amount paid representing principal, attorney 
        fees, and interest, if applicable.''.
    (b) Implementation.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall implement 
section 1304(d) of title 31, United States Code, as added by subsection 
(a), beginning not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-1206 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-021-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Model S-70, S-70A, and S-70C helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 9 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to reduce or establish life limits to prevent fatigue 

failure of certain parts and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $70,000 for the main rotor blade,

$30,000 for the tail rotor blade,

$490 for the elastomeric sleeve bearing,

$233 for the right tie rod attach bolt,

$40,000 for the main rotor hub,

$12,000 for the main landing gear shock strut piston 

system,

$44,000 for the tail rotor servo,

$200 for the crossfeed breakaway valve,

$59,000 for the main module planetary carrier 

assembly, and

$3,700 for the dowel pins (11 total).

Labor per Helicopter

(4.7 hours x $85/work-hour

for replacement)

$400.00

Other (Explain)

Total US Fleet Cost $2,372,607

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Michael Davison
| (1) | The      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or      15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      Daniel N. Ford      |   | Dated      this 13th day of November 2009. |
|--------|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   | Daniel N. Ford               |   |                                            |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |                                            |

----