alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Council Members: Brenda Stardig Jerry Davis Ellen R. Cohen Dwight A. Boykins Dave Martin Richard Nguyen Oliver Pennington Edward Gonzalez

Robert Gallegos Mike Laster Larry V. Green Stephen C. Costello David W. Robinson Michael Kubosh C.O. “Brad” Bradford Jack Christie Controller: Ronald C. Green 

# CITY OF 

# HOUSTON Legal Department Annise D. Parker Mayor

Donna L. Edmundson City Attorney Legal Department P.O. Box 368 Houston, Texas 77001-0368 City Hall Annex 900 Bagby, 4th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 832.393.6491 - Telephone 832.393.6259 - Facsimile www.houstontx.gov March 25, 2015 Via e-Filing Hon. Chris Daniel Harris County District Clerk 201 Caroline, Suite 420 Houston, Texas 77002 Re: Cause No. 2015-02771; Freedmen’s Town Preservation Coalition v. City of Houston and Conrad Construction Co., Ltd. ; in the 80th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas Appeal: No. 14-15-00138-CV; The City of Houston v. Freedmen’s Town Preservation Coalition; in the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas at Houston Dear Mr. Daniel: Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 34.5(c)(1), Defendant/Appellant City of Houston (the City) requests that the documents listed below be included in a Supplemental Clerk’s Record to be prepared, certified and filed in the above-numbered appeal in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals: Image No. Date filed Document
1. 64384617 02/24/15 Plaintiff’s Verified Second Amended Original Petition and Application for Injunctive Relief, and attached affidavit of Catherine Roberts 2. 64389889 02/25/15 Plaintiff’s Supplement to Verified Second Amended Original Petition and Application for Injunctive Relief 3. 64469295 03/02/15 Order Granting Temporary Injunction 4. 64587620 03/11/15 Conrad’s Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion to Dissolve Temporary Injunction, Exhibits 1 through 3, Proposed Order, and Notice of Oral Hearing ACCEPTED 14-15-00138-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/25/2015 4:34:10 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKHon. Chris Daniel

March 25, 2015 Page 2 Image No. Date filed Document
5. 64613595 03/13/15 Conrad’s Supplement to Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion to Dissolve Temporary Injunction, and attached Exhibit 3 6. 64716269 03/20/15 Order Denying Conrad’s Plea to the Jurisdiction and Motion to Dissolve Temporary Injunction 7. 64726010 03/20/15 Defendant’s Notice of Interlocutory Appeal 8. Certified Bill of Costs 9. Docket Sheet 10. 03/25/15 This letter Please let me know the cost of preparing this Clerk’s Record at your earliest convenience so that I can make arrangements for payment. Thank you for your courtesy and prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, /s/ Kathleen Hopkins Alsina Kathleen Hopkins Alsina Senior Assistant City Attorney 832-393-6459 kate.alsina@houstontx.gov

cc: Via e-service Benjamin L. Hall, IIIHon. Chris Daniel

March 25, 2015 Page 3



### Certificate of Service I hereby certify that on this 25th day of March, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served on counsel below via e-service. Benjamin L. Hall, III The Hall Law Firm 530 Lovett Boulevard Houston, Texas 77006 bhall@bhalllawfirm.com /s/ Kathleen Hopkins Alsina Kathleen Hopkins Alsina
#### Wayne ANDERSON, Appellant, v. Frank L. KING, Jr., Appellee.

No. 7359.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Nov. 28, 1961.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 19, 1961.

*946Fisher, McLaughlin & Harrison, Paris, for appellant.

Pat Beadle, Clarksville, for appellee.

DAVIS, Justice.

This is a venue case. Plaintiff-appellee sued the defendant-appellant in the District Court of Red River County for $1,720, the amount the appellant was supposed to have paid the appellee for a Dodge Pickup and a trailer that appellant bought at an auction sale at appellee’s ranch. Appellant, a resident of Lamar County, was permitted to give his personal check on a Lamar County Bank and carry the property with him. It was by this means that the appellant wrongfully converted the property. As soon as the- property was in Lamar County, appellant stopped payment on the check.

At the hearing on the plea of privilege, appellee proved his cause of action, and in conclusion the appellant stipulated as follows : “We stipulate in behalf of Mr. Anderson that at the time of the auction Mr. Anderson gave the check that has been introduced in evidence; but prior to its clearing the bank, he stopped payment on the check, and that he has not made subsequent payment for the equipment.”

The property is still in Lamar County. Appellant takes the position that there was something wrong with the truck. He does not complaint about anything being wrong with the trailer. The auctioneer testified that at the sale he made the announcement, at least three times, that there were no warranties or guarantees of any kind on the motor vehicles. The appellant bought the pickup and trailer and promised to pay therefor. After receiving the property, he stopped payment on his check. He thereby became guilty of conversion and comes within the provisions of Sec. 9 of Article 1995, Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Cir.St. 42 Tex.Jur. 518, Sec. 12; Hill v. Childers et al., Tex.Civ.App., 268 S.W.2d 203, W.R., N.R.E.; San Antonio & A. P. Railway Company v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 171 S.W. 282, N.W.H.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of iPCS, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedcertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Timothy M. Yager                                                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy  M. Yager, President and Chief Executive Officer                             |   |
| Date:  November 3, 2009                                                         |   |
|                                                                                 |   |
|                                                                                 |   |
| /s/  Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr.                                                   |   |
| Stebbins  B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| Date:  November 3, 2009                                                         |   |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1317 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1317

  To discontinue Radio Marti and Television Marti broadcasts to Cuba.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2011

 Ms. McCollum introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To discontinue Radio Marti and Television Marti broadcasts to Cuba.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This act may be cited as the ``Stop Wasting Taxpayer Money on Cuba 
Broadcasting Act''.

SEC. 2. DISCONTINUATION OF RADIO MARTI AND TELEVISION MARTI BROADCASTS 
              TO CUBA.

    (a) Radio Broadcasting to Cuba Act.--The Radio Broadcasting to Cuba 
Act (22 U.S.C. 1465 et seq.) is repealed.
    (b) Television Broadcasting to Cuba Act.--The Television 
Broadcasting to Cuba Act (22 U.S.C. 1465aa et seq.) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Scios Inc., on Form S-8 (File No. 333-56269) of our report dated January 31,
2000 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Scios Inc. and
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the years ended December
31, 1999, 1998 and 1997, which report is included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
January 31, 2000
#### Ex parte Brack LAGRONE.

No. 30638.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1959.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding remanding appellant to custody for extradition to the State of Kansas.

The executive warrant of the governor of this state was introduced in evidence. An affidavit (complaint) made before a magistrate, together with a warrant issued thereon was introduced in evidence. The *959complaint charges the commission of a crime by the appellant while he was in the State of Kansas. It was sworn to before the Judge and ex-officio Clerk of the County Court of Ford County, Kansas; and a warrant was issued thereon for the arrest of the appellant. The requisition of the Governor of Kansas and other supporting papers are included in the record.

The trial judge correctly concluded that the proceeding was in compliance with the requirements of Sec. 3, Art. 1008a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

Frank B. Maple, Jr., while testifying on the hearing identified the appellant as the person from whom he had received a $72,384 check on June 7, 1958, in Dodge City, Kansas, which was drawn on a bank in Amarillo, Texas.

The record shows that the above mentioned check upon which payment was refused is the basis of the crime on which these proceedings rest.

Appellant did not testify.

The trial court was authorized to conclude as he did and remand appellant for extradition.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
Exhibit
10.18


 


September 22, 2003


 


PUBLIC FILMWORKS


Thomas Szabo


Corbin Bernsen


Shaun Edwards


Mike Jones


14759 Oxnard Street


Van Nuys, California
91411


 


Dear Thomas, Corbin,
Shaun and Mike:


 


This letter will serve to
confirm that Charles Sherman Public Relations will provide exclusive publicity
and promotional services to Public Filmworks beginning October 1, 2003 on
a monthly basis.  Either party can
terminate this agreement upon written notice with 30 day notice.


 


In return for these
services, Charles Sherman Public Relations will receive a monthly retainer of
$2000.00 a month, payable the first day of each month beginning October 1,
2003. In addition, Client agrees to reimburse Agency for actual out-of-pocket
expenses for postage, phone calls (local and long distance), photo duplication,
faxing, photography, printing, mileage, etc., to be charged in accordance with
reasonable customary standards. No individual expense will exceed $200.00
without prior approval from Client. Invoices are due and payable within 30 days
of receipt.


 


This Agreement shall be
governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of
California. If this meets with your understanding of our agreement, please sign
a copy of this letter and return it in the enclosed addressed envelope. We look
forward to a close and beneficial working relationship.


 


Sincerely,


 


 


	
  /s/ Charles Sherman

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Charles Sherman

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  /s/ SHAUN EDWARDES

  	
  9/22/03

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Client

  	
  Date
#### STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. U. J. LUNDY et ux., Appellees.

No. 3969.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1961.

Will Wilson, Atty. Gen., Watson C. Arnold, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Willard McLaughlin, Sam Lanham, Waco, for appellees.

*920McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a condemnation case which resulted in judgment for the plaintiff, State of Texas, for certain lands and a money award to landowner defendants. Defendants filed Motion for New Trial, which was granted by the Trial Court. Plaintiff, State of Texas, appealed from such order granting a new trial in the case, and caused transcript to be filed in this court on 10 October, 1961.

Plaintiffs have filed no brief, and further have made it known to the court that it does not desire to prosecute such appeal further.

Appeal is therefore Dismissed.

Dismissed.
#### Irvin SAYLOR, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 29, 1959.

John P. Allen, Mt. Vernon, for appellant,

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., Wm. F, Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

SANDIDGE, Judge.

The appellant, Irvin Saylor, was convicted in the Rockcastle Circuit Court of stealing 40 bushels of corn of the value of $50 which belonged to Roy Kidwell. He was sentenced to one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant urges the court should have-sustained his motion for a directed verdict, on the theory that the evidence was circumstantial and just as consistent with his innocence as with his guilt.

We have carefully considered the evidence and find appellant’s contention is without merit. The evidence is circumstantial, and as to some things conflicting, but when considered as a whole, we think it points unerringly to appellant’s guilt. There is nothing to be served by reviewing *820the evidence in detail, but we might point out the conclusive proof of a trail of “slip shucked” corn of the type in Kidwell’s crib from the latter, for more than a mile, to the home of appellant; the finding of such corn at his place; and the proof that the corn first appeared scattered along such route in close proximity to the time appellant admittedly traveled over same with a wagon and truck, amply justifies our conclusion.

Under the evidence the court correctly submitted the case to the jury, and its verdict was fully supported thereby. The judgment is affirmed.
### SERVE D MAY26 , 201 0

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASfflNGTON , D.C
. I N TH EMATTE RO F AIRTRA N AIRWAYS , INC. , Respondent
. DOCKE T NO
. CP10SO000 2 (Civi l Penalty Proceeding ) DM S NO
. FAA-2010-019 3
HEARIN GNOTIC E PLEAS ETAK ENOTIC Etha t th e hearin g i n thi s cas e wil l b e hel do n Jun e 15 , 2010 , beginnin g a

t 10:0 0 a.m. , loca l tim e at th e followin g location : U.S
. Bankruptc y Court 13 5 WCentra l Blvd , 5 * Floo r Orlando , F L3280 1 Allo w tim e t o pas s throug hsecurity
.

Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachment-Servic e Lis t '•.'^nTAT!
. 

# w mFA A Docke t No
. CP10EA000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action )
SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Stephe n J
. Kolski , Executiv e Vic e Presiden t Operation s & Corporat e Affair s AirTran Airways , Inc. , Responden t 995 5 AirTra n Blv d Orlando , FL3282 7 TEL : 407-318-510 8 FAX : 407-318-590 1 Rashaw n Ric hGeorge , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASO- 7 Southern Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O
. Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , GA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne y 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

Service wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Live Current Media Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Geoffrey Hampson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/C. Geoffrey Hampson


C. Geoffrey Hampson


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


May 14, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1400 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1400

 To validate final patent number 27-2005-0081, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2011

  Mr. Heller (for himself, Ms. Berkley, and Mr. Heck) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To validate final patent number 27-2005-0081, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINAL PATENT AND LAND RECONFIGURATION IN CLARK COUNTY AND 
              LINCOLN COUNTY, NEVADA.

    Patent No. 27-2005-0081 and its associated land reconfiguration 
issued by the Bureau of Land Management on February 18, 2005, is hereby 
affirmed and validated as having been issued pursuant to and in 
compliance with the provisions of the Nevada-Florida Land Exchange 
Authorization Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-275), the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and the Federal Land Policy 
Management Act of 1976 for the benefit of the desert tortoise and other 
species and their habitat to increase the likelihood of their recovery. 
The process utilized by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and 
the Bureau of Land Management in reconfiguring the lands as shown on 
Exhibit 1-4 of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Planned 
Development Project MSHCP, Lincoln County, NV (FWS-R8-ES-2008-N0136) 
and the reconfiguration provided for in Special Condition 10 of Army 
Corps of Engineers Permit No. 200125042 are hereby ratified.
                                 <all>
```
112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1461 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Mescalero Apache Tribe to lease adjudicated 

water rights. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1461 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mescalero Apache 

3 Tribe Leasing Authorization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) ADJUDICATED WATER RIGHTS.—The term 

7 ‘‘adjudicated water rights’’ means water rights that 

8 were adjudicated to the Tribe in State v. Lewis, 116 

9 N.M. 194, 861 P. 2d 235 (1993). 

10 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

11 the Secretary of the Interior. 

12 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

13 of New Mexico. 

14 (4) TRIBE.—The term ‘‘Tribe’’ means the Mes15 calero Apache Tribe. 

16 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION TO LEASE ADJUDICATED WATER 

17 RIGHTS. 

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi19 sion of law, subject to subsections (b) and (c), the Tribe 

20 may lease, enter into a contract with respect to, or other21 wise transfer to another party, for another purpose, or to 

22 another place of use in the State, all or any portion of 

23 the adjudicated water rights. 

24 (b) STATE LAW.—In carrying out any action under 

25 subsection (a), the Tribe shall comply with all laws (in-
3 

•HR 1461 EH

1 cluding regulations) of the State with respect to the leas2 ing or transfer of water rights. 

3 (c) ALIENATION; MAXIMUM TERM.— 

4 (1) ALIENATION.—The Tribe shall not perma5 nently alienate any adjudicated water rights. 

6 (2) MAXIMUM TERM.—The term of any water 

7 use lease, contract, or other agreement under this 

8 section (including a renewal of such an agreement) 

9 shall be not more than 99 years. 

10 (d) LIABILITY.—The Secretary shall not be liable to 

11 the Tribe or any other person for any loss or other det12 riment resulting from a lease, contract, or other arrange13 ment entered into pursuant to this section. 

14 (e) PURCHASES OR GRANTS OF LAND FROM INDI15 ANS.—The authorization provided by this Act for the leas16 ing, contracting, and transfer of the adjudicated water 

17 rights shall be considered to satisfy any requirement for 

18 authorization of the action by treaty or convention im19 posed by section 2116 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 

20 177). 

21 (f) PROHIBITION ON FORFEITURE.—The nonuse of 

22 all or any portion of the adjudicated water rights by a 

23 lessee or contractor shall not result in the forfeiture, aban24 donment, relinquishment, or other loss of all or any por25 tion of the adjudicated water rights. 
4 

•HR 1461 EH

1 (g) APPLICABILITY.—This Act shall not apply to 

2 leasing, contracting, or transfer of the adjudicated water 

3 rights on the Tribe’s reservation. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 19, 

2012. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

112TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1461 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Mescalero Apache Tribe to lease 

adjudicated water rights.
EXHIBIT 23
                                                             ----------
                 CONSENT OF LAZAR, LEVINE & FELIX LLP

            We consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report dated January 6, 2005 (except for Note 15, the date of which
is January 14, 2005) and (June 3, 2005 as to the effects of the
restatement discussed in Note 4, and August 3, 2005 as to the revenue
recognition disclosure in Note 1) with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto of Touchstone Applied
Science Associates, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-
KSB) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission into (i) the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (SEC File No. 333-27659), (ii)
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-
424), (iii) the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (SEC
File No. 333-75377), (iv) the Company's Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-110156), and (v) the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-110157).

LAZAR, LEVINE & FELIX LLP
New York, New York
August 3, 2005