alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1555 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1555

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to limit the number of Urban 
    Area Security Initiative grants awarded and to clarify the risk 
 assessment formula to be used when making such grants, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 14, 2011

Mrs. Lowey (for herself and Mr. Israel) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to limit the number of Urban 
    Area Security Initiative grants awarded and to clarify the risk 
 assessment formula to be used when making such grants, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTION AND AWARDING OF URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE 
              GRANTS.

    (a) Limitation on Number of Urban Area Security Initiative 
Grants.--Section 2003(b)(1) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 
U.S.C. 604(b)(1)) is amended by inserting ``not more than 25'' after 
``designate''.
    (b) Risk Assessment Formula.--The Homeland Security Act of 2002 is 
amended--
            (1) in section 2003(b)(2)(A) (6 U.S.C. 604(b)(2)(A)), in 
        the matter preceding clause (i), by inserting ``, in accordance 
        with section 2007(c),'' after ``shall conduct''; and
            (2) in section 2007 (6 U.S.C. 608)--
                    (A) in subsection (a)(1), in the matter preceding 
                subparagraph (A), by inserting ``in accordance with 
                subsection (c)'' after ``terrorism''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following new 
                subsection:
    ``(c) Risk Assessment Formula.--In allocating the funds referred to 
in subsection (a), the Administrator shall, when weighing 
considerations of threat, vulnerability, and consequences from acts of 
terrorism, assign a percentage value that is not less than 33.''.
    (c) Clarification of Minimum Allocation To Apply Only to State 
Homeland Security Grants.--Clauses (iv) and (v) of section 
2004(e)(1)(A) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 
605(e)(1)(A)) are amended by striking ``and section 2003'' each place 
it appears.
    (d) Effective Date.--This Act (and the amendments made by this Act) 
shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall 
apply to grants made on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
EX-10.6(A)



 Exhibit 10.6(a) 

June 1, 2016 
 Aspect Capital Ltd. 

10 Portman Square 
 London W1H 6AZ, 

U.K. 
 Attention: Mr. Anthony Todd, CEO 

 

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Todd: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2017 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


	 	•	 	Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 


	 	•	 	Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


	 	•	 	CMF Aspect Master Fund L.P. 


	 	•	 	Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P 


	 	•	 	Global Futures Fund Ltd 


	 	•	 	MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036 or fax to
866-428-9026. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212-296-6808 or contact Jack Yuen at 212-296-1320. 

Very truly yours, 
  

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC	  	
		
	By: /s/ Patrick T.
Egan                                         
             	  	
	Patrick T. Egan	  	
	President and Director	  	
		
	ASPECT CAPITAL LTD.	  	
		
	By: /s/
A. J. Todd                                      
                                    	  	
		
	Print Name: A. J. Todd                               
                                 	  	
		
	PE/kg
----

 Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Destination Television, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon Scott Venters, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: March 22, 2009

| /s/ Gordon Scott Venters                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Gordon Scott Venters, President and           Chief Executive Officer           (Principal Executive Officer) and           Acting Chief Financial Officer           (Principal Financial Officer and           Principal Accounting Officer) |
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41236

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GILBERTO VILLANUEVA-AVILA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-01-CR-448-1

--------------------

June 18, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gilberto

Villanueva-Avila on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw as

counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Villanueva has not filed a

response to counsel's motion and brief. 

Our independent review of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel's motion for
No. 01-41236

-2-

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1509 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1509

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit the inclusion 
         of Social Security account numbers on Medicare cards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2011

 Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself and Mr. Doggett) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prohibit the inclusion 
         of Social Security account numbers on Medicare cards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Identity Theft Prevention 
Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF INCLUSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT NUMBERS ON 
              MEDICARE CARDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 205(c)(2)(C) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new clause:
    ``(xi) The Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation 
with the Commissioner of Social Security, shall establish cost-
effective procedures to ensure that a Social Security account number 
(or any derivative thereof) is not displayed, coded, or embedded on the 
Medicare card issued to an individual who is entitled to benefits under 
part A of title XVIII or enrolled under part B of title XVIII and that 
any other identifier displayed on such card is easily identifiable as 
not being the Social Security account number (or a derivative 
thereof).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply with respect to Medicare cards issued on and after an 
        effective date specified by the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services, but in no case shall such effective date be later 
        than the date that is 24 months after the date of the enactment 
        of this Act.
            (2) Reissuance.--In the case of individuals who have been 
        issued such cards before such effective date, the Secretary of 
        Health and Human Services--
                    (A) shall provide for the reissuance for such 
                individuals of such a card that complies with such 
                amendment not later than 3 years after such effective 
                date; and
                    (B) may permit such individuals to apply for the 
                reissuance of such a card that complies with such 
                amendment before the date of reissuance otherwise 
                provided under subparagraph (A) in such exceptional 
                circumstances as the Secretary may specify.
                                 <all>
```
#### Ira Mack CHRISTOPH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29967.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1958.

Sam Hoover, Pasadena, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Fred M. -..ooey and Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction under the so-called habitual-criminal statute, art. 63, P.C., fixing punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary, upon conviction three times of a felony less than capital, for life.

The sole question for review is the action of the trial court in refusing to permit counsel for appellant to argue before the jury that one of the prior felony convictions was not a final conviction because of an order in the sentence making that conviction run concurrently with another conviction.

The trial court refused counsel the right to present argument to the jury upon that question and in that manner to attack the finality and validity of the judgment of conviction.

Appellant insists that such action by the trial court was an infringement upon and a violation of his right to be heard by counsel. Art. 1, Sec. 10, Const, of Texas, Vernon’s Ann.St.

There is no question but that the Constitution guarantees to an accused the right to be heard by himself or counsel, including the right of argument to the jury.

This right, however, must of necessity be restricted to matters coming within the province of the jury for their determination.

Here, the prior judgments of conviction were regular upon their face. No *841attack was made thereon upon the trial of the case as to that fact. There was no evidence showing that the judgments were not, in fact, final.

In Arnold v. State, 127 Tex.Cr.R. 89, 74 S.W.2d 997, and Whiddon v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 23, 266 S.W.2d 167, we held that in prosecutions of this nature certified copies of the prior judgments of conviction when offered in evidence made a prima facie case that the judgments were final and that such continued until the prima facie case so made had been attacked or in some manner brought into question.

Under this record the finality of the judgments was established as a matter of law and there was nothing before the jury to the contrary.

We are constrained to agree that under such circumstances the constitutional right to be heard by counsel has not been denied this appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Robert Lee YOUNG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29018.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1957.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for forgery; the punishment, 2 years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Matthew Rodriquez 

S~cr~tary for 

Environm~ntaf Prot~ction 

December 11, 2012 

Air Resources Board 

Mary D. Nichols, Chairman 

1001 I Street· P.O. Box 2815· 

Sacramento, California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov 

Administrator Lisa P. Jackson 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Headquarters Ariel Rios Building . 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Mail Code 1101A 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

Governor 

Re: 2008 Amendments to Spark Ignition Marine Engine and Boat Regulations, 

Request for Confirmation that Certain of the Regulations are Not Preempted; 

Certain Regulations are Within the Scope of Previous Authorization and Request 

for New Authorization Under Clean Air Act Section 209(e)(2) 

Dear Administrator Jackson: 

At a July 24, 2008 hearing, the California Air Resources Board (GARB) approved 

amendments to Spark Ignition Marine Engine and Boat regulations. The amendments 

became final and effective as of July 17, 2009. The amendments addressed issues that 

developed between 2006 and 2008 and enhanced alignment with other GARB and U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency regulations. 

I am writing to request that you confirm that certain of the amendments fall within the 

scope of previously granted authorization and to authorize enforcement of the remaining 

amendments. 

I am enclosing our analysis, which includes a description of the 2008 Amendments to 

Spark Ignition Marine Engine and Boat regulations and our rationale supporting our 

request, including supporting documents. 

If you need additional technical information on this item, please contact Ron Haste, 

Emission Research and Regulation Development Branch, Off-Road Control Section, at 

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. 

For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.qov. 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator 

December 11, 2012 

Page 2 

(626) 575-6676 or rhaste@arb.ca.qov. You may address legal questions to Lisa Brown, 

Senior Staff Counsel, at (916) 324-2132 or lbrown@arb.ca.gov. 

rely,

1

/) 

ame•N.~~~--

Enclosures 

cc: David Dickinson (w/encls.) 

Attorney/Advisor 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Mail Code 6405J 

Washington, DC 20460 

Alberto Ayala, Ph.D., M.S. E. (w/o encl.) 

Deputy Executive Officer 

Mr. Ron Haste, Manager (w/o encl.) 

Emission Research and Regulation Development Branch 

Off-Road Control Section, Mobile Source Control Division 

Ms. Lisa Brown, Senior Staff Counsel (w/o encl.) 

Office of Legal Affairs
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

THASHA A. BOYD, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

______________________

2014

- 3022

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No s

. AT1221120456 -W- 1 and AT1221120665 -W1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

The Department of Labor moves for a 21

- day exte nsion of time, until January 21, 2014, to file its principal brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. Case: 14-3022 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 01/17/2014BOYD v. LABOR 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s27 Case: 14-3022 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 01/17/2014
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Joseph P. Ciavarella, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Langer, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: March 30, 2005



/s/JOSEPH P. CIAVARELLAJoseph P. Ciavarella, Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

================================================================================

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the Registration
Statements on Form S-2 (No. 333-55874), Form S-8 (No.'s 333-39766, 333-37310,
333-31104, 333-95655, 333-92239, 333-87541, 333-84457, 333-81033 and 333-80135)
of Imaging Technologies Corporation of our report dated October 10, 2000 of our
report dated October 10, 2001 appearing in the June 30, 2001 Annual Report of
this Form 10-K.

BOROS & FARRINGTON APC

SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

October 10, 2001
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

October 19, 2018

No . 04

- 18

- 00029

- CV

AUTOBUSES ZAVALA PLUS

,

Appellant

v.

Maria Torres MARTINEZ

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CI02517 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellee ’ s second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to November 19, 2018. Further requests for extension of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of October, 20 18

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-31259

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES R. ORGERON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CR-96-ALL-C

- - - - - - - - - -

April 19, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James R. Orgeron appeals from the jury conviction under 18

U.S.C. § 228 for willful failure to pay child support. Orgeron

argues that the evidence is insufficient to prove beyond a

reasonable doubt that he willfully failed to pay child support

because his failure to make partial payments did not adequately

establish willfulness. 

Orgeron’s timely motion pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 29(c) is

sufficient to preserve his insufficiency argument for appellate

review. United States v. Allison, 616 F.2d 779, 784 (5th Cir.
No. 99-31259

-2-

1980). This court reviews the district court’s denial of a motion

for judgment of acquittal de novo. United States v. Ferguson, 211

F.3d 878, 882 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 258 (2000). In

evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, the court “must

determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable

to the verdict and drawing all reasonable inferences from the

evidence in support of the verdict, a rational trier of fact could

have found that the evidence established the essential elements of

the offense beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id.

We have reviewed the record and hold that a reasonable trier

of fact could find that the evidence establishes beyond a

reasonable doubt that Orgeron knew of the legal duty to pay child

support, that he could have paid some amount toward his past due

support obligation, and that he willfully chose not to pay

anything. United States v. Mathes, 151 F.3d 251, 253-54 (5th Cir.

1998). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**522 CAF 14-00467**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF DREW F.-C., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ---------------------------- ORDER GENESEE COUNTY ATTORNEY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

PAUL B. WATKINS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
CHARLES N. ZAMBITO, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (DURIN B. ROGERS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered February 10, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3. The order, among other things, placed respondent in a limited secure facility with an onsite mental health component/program. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by appellant, and by the attorneys for the parties on February 5 and 9, 2015, It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: May 1, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court