FIL ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTHCI RCUI T FEB 22, 2012 J OHN L EY CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 1- 14 33 0 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ D.C. Dock etNo. 2 :1 0- cr-1 40 34 -J EM-1 UNITED STAT ES OF AMERIC A, Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll ee, ve rs us VICENTE GUTIERREZ, a.k .a. Ju anJo se Pav on -Cab rera , Defen da nt -Ap pe ll an t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S tate s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e So ut he rnDis tri ctof F lo rid a

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ (Feb ru ary 22 , 20 12 ) Befo re HULL, PRYOR an d B LACK, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM:Vicen te Gut ie rrez ap pe al s h is sen te nc e o f im pr is on m en t fo r 57 m on th s, whi chwas i m

po se d o n re se nt en ci ng aft er an earl ie r pl ea o f gu il t t o o ne co un t o f il le ga l re en try afterde po rta ti on . 8 U.S.C. § 13 26 (a). Gut ie rrez arg ue s tha t h is se nt en ce i s s ub st an ti ve ly unr eas on ab le be cau se th e d is tri ctco urt s en te nc edhi m as if h e h adbe enco nv ic te d o f a cri m e o f vi ol en ce an d v ari edup wardfro m th e gu id el in e ran ge of 1 5 t o 2 1 m on th s o f im pr is on m en t as if andto th e sa m e ex te nt th athe ha d aco nv ic ti on fora cri m e o f vi ol en ce b efo re d ep orta ti on . Gut ie rrez co nt en ds th atne ithe r hi s cr im in al hi st ory no r hi s p ers on al ch arac te ris ti cs warrant edth e upwa rdva ria nc e aft er wei gh in g the rel ev an t s en te nc in g fa ct or s. 1 8 U.S.C. § 3 55 3( a). W e aff irm. W e rev ie w all sen te nc es forreas on ab le ne ss un de r a d efer en ti al st an dardof rev ie w forab us e o f di sc ret io n. Un it edSta te s v . San ch ez, 5 86 F.3d91 8, 9 35 (11 th Ci r. 20 09 ). The ab us e-o f-d is cret io n s ta nd ard“ ‘allo ws a ra ng e o f ch oi ce fo r th e di st ric t co urt, s o l on g a s tha t ch oi ce d oe s n otco ns ti tu te a cl ear e rro r of jud gm en t.’” Uni te d S tate s v . Irey, 61 2 F .3d11 60 , 11 89 (11 th Cir . 20 10 ) (enba nc ) (quo ti ng Uni te d S tate s v . Frazi er, 3 87 F.3d12 44 , 12 59 (11 th Cir . 20 04 ) (enba nc )), cert. de ni ed , 13 1 S . Ct. 1 81 3 (2 01 1) . A m ajorva ria nc e requi res m or e jus ti fic at io n t ha n a m in oron e an d t he jus ti fic at io n m us t b e “ ‘suf

fic ie nt ly com

pe ll in g t o s up po rt t he de gr ee o f th e v ari an ce.’” Id . at11 96 (qu ot in g Gal l v . Uni te d S ta te s, 5 52 U.S. 38 , 250 , 12 8 S . Ct. 5 86 , 59 7 (2 00 7) ). W e wil l v acat e a s en te nc e b as edon su chan

up wardva ria nc e o nl y

if “ le ft wi th th e d efi ni te an d fi rm co nv ic ti on th atth e d is tri ct co urt co m

m it te d acle ar erro r of

jud gm en t i n wei gh in g t he § 3 55 3( a) fa ct or s b y arri vi ng at asen te nc e th atli es ou ts id e th e ran ge of r eas on ab le sen te nc es di ct at ed by the fact s o f th e cas e.” Uni te d S ta te s v . Shaw, 56 0 F .3d12 30 , 12 38 (11 th Cir . 20 09 ) (quo ti ng Uni te d S ta te s v . Pug h, 5 15 F.3d11 79 , 11 91 (11 th Cir . 20 08 )) . Guti erre z’s se nt en ce i s re as on ab le . The d is tri ctco urt co ns id eredth e st atut ory sen te nc in g fa ct or s, 1 8 U.S.C. § 35 53 (a), an d Gu ti erre z’s arg um en ts at se nt en ci ng . The d is tri ctco urt al so adhe redto ou r m an da te an d d idno t s en te nc e Gut ie rrez as i f he ha d b eenco nv ic te d o f a cri m e o f vi ol en ce. Gut ie rrez ha s an ex te ns iv e cri m in al hi st ory . He has be ench arg edwith s eco nd -d eg ree r ap e o f a m in or , sec on d- de gr ee s ta lk in g, driv in g u nd er the in flu en ce, v io lati ng pro ba ti on , as saul t, fa il ur e to ap pe ar t o s erv e jail ti m e, an d v io la ti ng a pr ot ect iv e o rd er. Bas ed on th is cri m in al hi st ory , th e co urt d idno t ab us e it s d is cret io n i n d et erm in in g t ha t a se nt en ce wi th in th e g ui de li ne s ra ng e was in su ffi ci en t, an d t ha t an up wardva ria nc e was ne ces sa ry

to pro m ot e res pe ctfor

th e la w andde te r fu tu re cr im in al co nduc t. The di st ric t co urt d idno t ab us e it s d is cret io n. We affi rm Gut ie rrez ’s sen te nc e. AFFIRMED.

3