alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tell-A-Tale Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| /s/ Anthony DeMint                                   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

November 1, 2005
#### BRICKWOOD CONTRACTORS, INC., petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 02-553.

Supreme Court of United States

Jan. 13, 2003.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Belmont Bancorp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wilbur R. Roat, President and Chief Executive of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|                                                  
|/s/    WILBUR R. ROAT                             
|                                                  
|Wilbur R. Roat President & Chief Executive Officer



March 22, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Belmont Bancorp. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Soyo Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Nancy
Chu, Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Nancy Chu
-----------------------
Nancy Chu
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2008
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 12 - 00638 - CR

GILBERT GRIMALDO APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 297TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1243 882D

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPIN ION 1

---------- Appellant Gilbert Grimaldo appeals his conviction and sixty

- year sentence for aggravated assault. 2 We affirm. Appellant’s indictment alleged that he had injured a woman by hitting, grabbing, and dragging her ; that he had also threatened i mminent bodily injury to

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.02(a)(2) (West 2011 ).2 her ; and that he had used or exhibited a deadly weapon (a knife ) during the assault. T he indictment contained a repeat offender notice, alleging that appellant had been previously convicted of murder. Appellant filed various pret rial documents and pled not guilty. A jury convicted him , and after he pled true to the indictment’s repeat offender notice, the trial court found the notice to be true and sentenced him to sixty years’ confinement. He brought this appeal. Appellant’s a ppointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that motion. In the brief and motion, counsel avers that he has diligently reviewed the record and opines that this appeal is frivolous. Counsel’ s brief and mot ion meet the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. 386 U.S. 738, 744

– 45, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967); see In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 406

– 12 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (analyzing the effect of Anders ). Appellant filed a pro se response to his counsel’s brief, contending that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. The State filed a brief, arguing that the e vidence is “amply sufficient.” Once an appellant ’ s court
- appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders , we must independently examine the record. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Roots v. State , 419 S.W.3d 719, 723 (Tex. App.

—3 Fort Worth 2013, pet. ref’ d)

. Only then may we grant counsel ’ s motion to withdraw. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988) ; Roots , 419 S .W.3d at 723

. We hav e carefully reviewed the record, appellant’s counsel ’ s brief, appellant’s pro se response, and the State’s brief. We agree with appellant’s counsel that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record t hat might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State , 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’ s motion to withdraw and af firm the trial co urt's judgment. See Roots , 419 S.W.3d at 723

. PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: September 18, 2014
#### Donald R. LANG, Appellant, v. Jack M. BASS, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 7679.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Nov. 23, 1965.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 14, 1965.

See also Tex.Civ.App., 374 S.W.2d 900.

Gerald H. Fortney, Houston, for appellant.

William Key Wilde, Bracewell, Reynolds & Patterson, David J. Nagle, Nagle & Hall, Houston, for appellees.

CHADICK, Chief Justice.

This suit originated as an action to recover the unpaid balance of a promissory note, a reasonable attorney fee as contracted for in the note, interest, etc. The trial court’s take nothing judgment rendered non obstante veredicto is affirmed.

*919Prior to the trial on the merits this case was consolidated for trial purposes with two others and by stipulation the United States Sulphur Corporation, a co-defendant, was dismissed as a party. Early in the trial on the merits parol evidence tending to prove that Jack M. Bass, Jr., and a partnership composed of Harold W. Clark, Beverly W. Landstreet III, Edward L. Kirkpatrick, Jr., and William Nelson II were co-guarantors of the payment of the promissory note in suit and obligated to pay it, though not signatories, was excluded as violative of Articles 3995, subdivision 2 (Statute of Frauds), and 5932, subsection 18 (Negotiable Instrument Act), Vernon’s Annotated Texas Civil Statutes.

To avoid the consequences of the trial court ruling, the defendant Donald R. Lang by trial amendment deleted all reference to a promissory note from his trial petition. As amended his petition stated an action for money lent. Bass and the partnership countered by pleading the two year statute of limitations, Article 5526, Section 4.

If it be conceded that the liability Lang seeks to enforce did not arise out of the promissory note and is not based thereon, and that the note is merely incidental and collateral to the agreement between Lang, as lender, and Bass and the partnership, as borrowers, as Lang contends, the two year statute of limitation bars his action. The breached loan agreement was not in writing. Lang’s amended trial petition asserted the indebtedness matured on or before February 18, 1962, and Bass and the partnership failed then and thereafter to satisfy it in full. The trial amendment pleading the action for money lent was filed with the permission of the court after trial on the merits began on September 17, 1964. More than two years elapsed between accrual of the action and the institution of a suit to enforce liability. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Moore v. Dilworth, (1944), 142 Tex. 538, 179 S.W.2d 940; Article 5526, Sec. 4.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

133) ll-E-93 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07 AM Sheet 133 of 264 
P.2 

04/14/1997 15:28 16104955934 

0414/S7 15:45 ©19199410234 

TAYLOR INDUSTRIES 

PES RTP NC 

PAGE 02 

@002/002 

A 9452 

Il-E~f 3 

Contact Report 

Plastic Composites NESHAP 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

Greg LaFlam, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

April 1,1997 

Mr. Bruce Taylor 

Taylor Industries, Inc., Parlcerford, PA 

Telephone Number (610)495-5261 

Contact Summary: 

The company produces bath products using polymer casting and gel coating processes. 

Mr. Taylor verified the infonnation provided in their 1993 EPA survey response: the casting 

resin used contains 28 percent by weight styrene as received, prior to the addition of other 

ingredients such as filler and colorants. Additional non-HAP monomer, at 4 percent by weight, 

is also included in the purchased resin. The resin is a terephthalic polyester supplied by Ashland 

Chemical, and is designated as KfRl 1076. A terephthalic resin was selected to solve the problem 

of drain cracking resulting from hot/cold water cycling. 

The facility operates one shift per day, mixes resin in open mixers, and uses acetone and 

Super Flush® for cleanup. 

REPORT IS ACCURATE >^fcfrfrg^ ^VC
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1484 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1484

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2011

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the appeals process 
                 of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Appeals Improvement Act of 
2011''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF REGIONAL OFFICE JURISDICTION OVER INCORPORATION OF 
              SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE INTO PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED CLAIMS.

    (a) Waiver.--Section 7104 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) If a claimant or the claimant's representative submits new 
evidence in support of a case for which a substantive appeal has been 
filed, such evidence shall be submitted to the Board directly and not 
to the agency of jurisdiction, unless the claimant or the claimant's 
representative requests that the evidence be reviewed by the agency of 
jurisdiction before being submitted to the Board.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (f) of section 7104 of title 38, 
United States Code, as added by subsection (a) of this section, shall 
apply with respect to

              

 evidence submitted on or after the date that is 90 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 31, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1503 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydrogenated polymers of 

norbornene derivatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2011 

Mr. YARMUTH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain hydrogenated 

polymers of norbornene derivatives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HYDROGENATED POLYMERS OF 

4 NORBORNENE DERIVATIVES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1503 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,4:5,8- 

Dimethanonaphthalene, 2- 

ethylidene1,2,3,4,4a,5,8,8aoctahydro-, polymer with 

3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7- 

methano-1H-indene, hydrogenated (CAS No. 

881025–72–5); 1,4- 

methano-1H-fluorene, 

4,4a,9,9a-tetrahydro-, 

polymer with 

1,2,3,4,4a,5,8,8aoctahydro-1,4:5,8- 

dimethanonaphthalene and 

3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,7- 

methano-1H-indene, hydrogenated (CAS No. 

503442–46–4); and 1,4- 

methano-1H-fluorene, 

4,4a,9,9a-tetrahydro-, 

polymer with 

1,2,3,4,4a,5,8,8aoctahydro-1,4:5,8- 

dimethanonaphthalene, hydrogenated (CAS No. 

503298–02–0); (all the 

foregoing provided for in 

subheading 3902.90.00) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2014 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSKD5P82C1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-100878 of E-Z-EM, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated July 27, 2004, except
for Note O, as to which the date is August 17, 2004, appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the fifty-two weeks
ended May 29, 2004.


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
August 17, 2004


                                     -110-
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 11829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03168]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2362-044]


ALLETE, Inc.; Notice of Waiver of Water Quality Certification

    On December 20, 2021, ALLETE, Inc. (ALLETE) filed an application 
for a license for the Grand Rapids Hydroelectric Project in the above 
captioned docket. On December 14, 2022, Minnesota Pollution Control 
Agency received a complete request for a Clean Water Act section 
401(a)(1) water quality certification from ALLETE in conjunction with 
the above captioned project.
    On December 21, 2022, staff provided Minnesota Pollution Control 
Agency with written notice that the applicable reasonable period of 
time for it to act on the certification request was one (1) year from 
the date of receipt of the request, and that the certification 
requirement for the license would be waived if the certifying authority 
failed to act by December 14, 2023. Because Minnesota Pollution Control 
Agency did not act by December 14, 2023, we are notifying you pursuant 
to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1), that 
waiver of the certification requirement has occurred.

    Dated: February 9, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-03168 Filed 2-14-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



November 15, 2004



In connection with the Large Scale Biology Corporation Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald J. Artale, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Large Scale Biology Corporation for the
fiscal period covered by the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Ronald J. ArtaleRonald J. ArtaleSenior Vice President, Chief OperatingOfficer and Chief Financial OfficerLarge Scale Biology Corporation
August 4, 2011

Ms. Elizabeth Craig

Acting Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs

U.S. EPA Headquarters 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Mail Code: 6201J 

Washington, DC 20460

Re: Request for Extension of Time to allow Submission of Florida’s 

Applications for Critical Use Exemptions

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ–OAR–2011–0431

Dear Ms. Craig:

Florida Fruit and Vegetable Association (FFVA) is a voluntary non-profit trade 

association whose mission is to enhance the competitive and business environment for 

producing and marketing fruits, vegetables and other crops. As part of this mission, we 

filed for and received Critical Use Exemptions (CUEs) for the continued use of methyl 

bromide since the inception of the CUE process. Simultaneously, we have continuously 

been directly involved in the discussions and research surrounding the use of methyl 

bromide and potential alternative chemicals as preplant soil fumigants in plasticmulched culture of vegetables and ornamentals, and their use as preplant fumigants in 

nursery production of transplants necessary for propagation of transplants in support of 

those industries. We have been involved in this ongoing effort and research since the 

filing of the 1991 petition listing methyl bromide for regulation under the U.S. Clean Air 

Act.

In the June 14, 2011 Federal Register, the Agency published a notice requesting 

applications for CUEs for 2014, (76 Fed. Reg. 34700-03). FFVA and its producer 

members are in the process of preparing a 2014 application for submission to the 

P.O. Box 948153, Maitland, FL 32794-8153 • 800 Trafalgar Court, Suite 200, Maitland, FL 32751

321.214.5200 • fax 321.214.0210 • www.ffva.com
E. Craig

August 4, 2011

Page 2 of 2

Agency. However, because of the press of other business, including but not limited to 

preparing for and participating in the meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group under 

the Montreal Protocol, additional time is needed to adequately prepare the requested 

application from Florida. FFVA respectfully requests an extension of slightly more than 

30 days to submit the applications, to September 16, 2011. It is believed that the 

additional time will not adversely impact the Agency’s judicious review of the 

applications and will assist FFVA in preparing the most robust applications possible. 

Issuing such brief extension is consistent with the public interest.

We would request that the Agency include this request in the docket.

Sincerely,

Daniel A. Botts

Vice President; Industry Relations

cc: Drusilla Hufford

Jeremy Arling