alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. McMartin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                         
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               





| | /s/ Robert W. McMartin                                                                
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Robert W. McMartin
Chief Financial Officer
Circuit Research Labs, Inc. 
April 16, 2007
#### Ross J. BOYERT, d/b/a The Ross Group, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Laszlo N. TAUBER, Defendant-Appellee, and Julian D. Pars; Consolidated Financial Trust, Defendants.

No. 91-1428.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Oct. 1, 1991.

Decided Aug. 25, 1992.

Earl Landers Vickery, Vickery, Kilbride, Gilmore & Vickery, Houston, Tex., argued (Arnold Anderson Vickery, on brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Roger Tehan Scully, II, Bethesda, Md., argued (William D. Quarles, Nancy A. Voi-sin, Venable, Baetjer, Howard & Civiletti, Washington, D.C., on brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before RUSSELL, Circuit Judge, BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge, and MICHAEL, United States District Judge for the Western District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

In this diversity case governed by Texas law we certified to the Supreme Court of Texas the following questions:

> (a) Whether the doctrine of partial performance permits a broker to maintain an action for a real estate commission where the memorandum evidencing the agreement refers to “outside brokers” but does not provide a complete listing of their names.

> (b) Whether parol evidence may be admitted to identify the broker to whom a commission is owed in an action to recover a real estate commission based on a document signed by the purchaser acknowledging a debt to “outside brokers” but not providing a complete listing of their names.

The Supreme Court of Texas responded with an opinion that holds:

> Neither parol evidence nor partial performance may be used to identify a broker when the reference in the writing required by the Real Estate Licensing Act, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6573a, § 20(b) (Vernon Supp.1992), is to outside brokers. Accordingly, both certified questions are answered in the negative.

*371*Boyert v. Tauber,*834 S.W.2d 60 (S.Ct.Tex. 1992).

The opinion of the Supreme Court of Texas disposes of the issues in this case. Accordingly, the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Laszlo N. Tauber is affirmed.

We express to the Supreme Court of Texas our appreciation for its acceptance of our certification and its prompt decision on the certified questions.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Allen D. THERRELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28583.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 2, 1956.

C. S. Farmer, Waco, for appellant.

H. D. Glover, County Atty., Pecos, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Proper and sufficient proof is before this court that appellant died on November 26, 1956.

It follows that the opinion heretofore delivered in this case, as well as the judgment entered, is hereby withdrawn, and the appeal is abated because of the death of appellant.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 12379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03250]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-IMR-AMCH-NPS0036797; ACCT Number: PPIMAMCH00//PPMPSAS1Z.Y00000]


Amache National Historic Site

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As authorized by the Amache National Historic Site Act, the 
National Park Service announces that the Secretary of the Interior has 
established, in the State of Colorado, the Amache National Historic 
Site as a unit of the National Park System.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Carlstrom, Deputy Regional 
Director, NPS, Intermountain Region at 720-616-9266.

ADDRESSES: A color version and more detailed area maps depicting the 
boundary are available here: https://www.nps.gov/amch/planyourvisit/maps.htm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 18, 2022, President Biden signed 
into law Public Law 117-106, which provides for the designation of the 
Granada Relocation Center in Prowers County, Colorado, as Amache 
National Historic Site. Amache was one of 10 incarceration camps 
established by the War Relocation Authority during World War II (WWII) 
to unjustly incarcerate Japanese Americans who were forcibly removed 
from their communities on the West Coast under the provisions of 
Executive Order 9066.
    The statute provides that Amache National Historic Site shall be 
established as a unit of the National Park System once the Secretary 
determines that a sufficient quantity of land, or interests in land, 
has been acquired to constitute a manageable park unit, and that the 
Secretary must publish notice of such establishment in the Federal 
Register.
    The National Park Service has acquired 410 acres within the 
proposed historic site boundary, encompassing the core of the former 
built-up area of Amache. On February 9, 2024, the Secretary of the 
Interior signed a Decision Memorandum determining that a sufficient 
quantity of land, or interests in land, had been acquired to constitute 
a manageable park unit. With the signing of this Decision Memorandum by 
the Secretary and the publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register, Amache National Historic Site is established.

Charles F. Sams III,
Director, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-03250 Filed 2-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of OnScreen Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company"), on Form 10-QSB of the quarter ended June
      30,
      2007 ,
      I
      hereby certify solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company





OnScreen
      Technologies, Inc.





By:
            /s/Russell
                L.
                Wall
              Russell
                L. Wall
            Dated
                this 14thday
                of August 2007Chief
                Executive Officer/Director
Distribution Agreement, dated September 23, 2002



 Exhibit 4.28 
  

	*	CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. REDACTED PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT ARE MARKED BY AN *.


  
 23 September 2002 
  
 The President 
 Medison Pharma Limited 
 10 Hasiloach St POB 7090 
 Petach Tikva 
  
 Dear Sir 
  
 Amendment Letter 
  
 I am writing in accordance with Section 19 of the distribution agreement between Medison Pharma Limited (“Medison”) and KS
Biomedix Holdings PLC “(KSB”) (“the Distribution Agreement”) dated 23 July 2002, to give notice of the agreed amendments to the Distribution Agreement following further discussion between the Parties. For ease of reference all
paragraph references in this letter relate to those used in the Distribution Agreement. Please can you arrange for the enclosed copy of this letter to be counter signed where appropriate by an authorised representative of Medison and thereafter
returned to us for our records. 
  
 Amendments to Distribution Agreement

  
 Effective Date 
  
 Whilst it is acknowledged by the Parties that the Distribution Agreement states an effective
date of 23 July 2002, Medison and KSB jointly accept and agree that the effective date for initiation of the Distribution Agreement be hereafter stated as 18 September 2002, and not 23 July 2002 as stated in the Distribution Agreement. 

 
 Investment (Section 3.5) 
  
 The existing Section 3.5 concerning Investment in KSB shall be deleted in its entirety and
shall be replaced by the following wording: 
  
 “In return for the
distribution rights the Distributor will purchase KS shares, upon execution of this Agreement at the amount of * (US $*). The effective price will be calculate as the average price of KS shares in the 30 working days preceding the Effective Date
plus *%. The parties to the Distribution Agreement hereby acknowledge that the average share price for KSB shares during the 30 working days preceding the Effective Date was £0.1619. On this basis the parties confirm that Medison is required
to subscribe for * ordinary shares in KSB at a price of £* per ordinary share in order to fulfil this obligation.” 
  









 The President 
 Medison
Pharma Limited 
 23 September 2002 
  
 In the event that you have any queries concerning the formal adjustments to the Distribution Agreement, then I would be grateful if you would notify them to us in writing
in accordance with Section 19 of the Distribution Agreement. 
  

	
	 Yours faithfully

	
	   /s/

	 Director
 For and on behalf of
 KSBiomedix Holdings plc


  
 We hereby confirm our acceptance of
amendments to the Distribution Agreement. 
  

	
	
	   /s/

	 Director
 For and on behalf of
 Medison Pharma Limited


  

 Page 2
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
------------------------------

     The Registrant, E-Z-EM, Inc., is a Delaware corporation.  The
subsidiaries of the Registrant included in the consolidated financial
statements are as follows:

                                             Incorporated
                                             ------------

     AngioDynamics, Inc.                       Delaware

     E-Z-EM Belgium B.V.B.A.                   Belgium

     E-Z-EM Canada Inc.                         Canada

     E-Z-EM Caribe, Inc.                       Delaware

     E-Z-EM International, Inc.                Barbados

     E-Z-EM Ltd.                               England

     E-Z-EM Nederland B.V.                     Holland

     E-Z-SUB, Inc.                             Delaware

     Enteric Products, Inc.                    Delaware

     Toho Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd.            Japan

     All subsidiaries of the Registrant are wholly-owned.

                                      -36-
#### Helen JOHNSTON, Independent Executrix of the Estate of Grant Lindsey, Deceased, and Testamentary Trustee for Grant Lindsey, Jr., Appellee, v. Robert S. CALVERT et al., Appellants.

No. A-6527.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 9, 1957.

Helen Johnston, pro se.

Will Wilson, Atty. Gen., of Texas, W. V. Geppert, Marietta McGregor Payne, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the view expressed by Mr. Justice Hughes [304 S.W.2d. 398] that Grant Lindsey, Jr. was not a “legally adopted child” within the meaning of Article 7118, Class A, Vernon’s Ann.Tex. Stats. See, Wooster v. Iowa State Tax Commission, 230 Iowa 797, 298 N.W. 922, 141 A.L.R. 1298.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 98 (Wednesday, May 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 29260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11776]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8742]

Renewal of Defense Trade Advisory Group Charter

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State announces the renewal of the Charter 
for the Defense Trade Advisory Group (DTAG). The DTAG advises the 
Department on its support for and regulation of defense trade to help 
ensure the foreign policy and national security of the United States 
continue to be protected and advanced, while helping to reduce 
unnecessary impediments to legitimate exports in order to support the 
defense requirements of U.S. friends and allies. It is the only 
Department of State advisory committee that addresses defense trade 
related topics. The DTAG will remain in existence for two years after 
the filing date of the Charter unless terminated or renewed sooner. The 
DTAG is authorized by 22 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  2651a and 2656 and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix.
    For more information, contact Lisa V. Aguirre, Alternate Designated 
Federal Officer, Defense Trade Advisory Group, Department of State, 
Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 663-2830.

    Date: May 14, 2014.
Lisa V. Aguirre,
Alternate Designated Federal Officer, Defense Trade Advisory Group, 
U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-11776 Filed 5-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
```
EXHIBIT
10.42(a)


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 1 (the
“Amendment”), dated and effective as of June 1, 2004 is entered by and
between IMAGE ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California corporation (“Image”), and
MARTIN W. GREENWALD, an individual 
(“Executive”), with respect to that certain Employment Agreement (the
“Agreement”), dated April 1, 2004 by and between Image and Executive.


 


The following shall amend
the Agreement in effect with Executive as and to the effect set forth herein.  Except as modified by this Amendment, the
Agreement with MARTIN W. GREENWALD remains in full force and effect.  Capitalized terms used herein and not
otherwise defined shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement.


 


1.                                       The
Table in Paragraph 3(a) “Base Salary” is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:


 


	
  Period

  	
   

  	
  Annual
  Rate

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Year
  ending on the first anniversary of the date hereof

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  529,657

  	
   

  	
  per year

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Year
  ending on the second anniversary of the date hereof

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  556,140

  	
   

  	
  per year

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Year
  ending on the third anniversary of the date hereof

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  583,947

  	
   

  	
  per year

  
							



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment No. 1 was executed as of the date first written above.


 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


 


 


	
  IMAGE ENTERTAINMENT,
  INC.:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Ira Epstein

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Ira Epstein, Esq.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Chairman, Compensation
  Committee of the Board of Directors

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  MARTIN W. GREENWALD:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Martin W. Greenwald

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Martin W. Greenwald
Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 2-
9458, No. 33-00184, No. 33-43168, No. 33-85010, No. 333-11325 and No. 333-46600
of E-Z-EM, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated July 29, 2002, appearing in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of E-Z-EM, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the fifty-two
weeks ended June 1, 2002.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
August 26, 2002


                                      -86-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2449

VERONICA SERRANO, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Naval Medical Research Center, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-1212-WDQ) Submitted: April 20, 2005 Decided: June 7, 2005 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Veronica Serrano, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine L. Sendek Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Veronica Serrano, a former federal employee, appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment as to her petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision and on her claim of employment discrimination based on age, race, sex, and reprisal in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Under Seal v. Under Seal , No. CA-04-1212-WDQ (D. Md. Sept. 27, 2004). We also grant the Appellant’s motion to modify the sealing of materials in this case so that only personal identifiers, including social security numbers, dates of birth, and financial information specific to account numbers, salaries, and finances are sealed. We deny the Appellant’s motions for appointment of counsel and for a transcript at the Government’s expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companyon Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Frank H. Laukien, as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of theBoard of Directors of the Company, and William J. Knight, as Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of their knowledge:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
|  Date: November 6, 2007 |   |                                                                         |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | By:    | /s/ Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D.                                                  |   |
|                         |   | Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D.

*President, Chief Executive  Officer, and Chairman* |
|                         |   | * *                                                                     |
|  Date: November 6, 2007 |   |                                                                         |
|                         | By:    | /s/ William J. Knight                                                        |   |
|                         |   | William J. Knight

*Chief Financial Officer*                                 |

 

*Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request*.

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 In connection with the Quarterly Report of TBX Resources, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Tim Burroughs, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 780(d); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated this 15th day of October 2004. By: /s/ Tim Burroughs
#### GRAYSON MOTOR SALES, Inc., Appellant, v. Leonidas Y. SUTTLES, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 1, 1957.

Thomas D. Theobald, Jr., Grayson, for appellant.

H. R. Wilhoit, Grayson, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We are affirming the judgment for $500 for the appellee on his counterclaim because we think it was proper to submit the case to the jury on the question of an implied warranty of fitness of a used truck.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Take A Ride, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

May 13,2004