Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 37681 

(airplanes previously affected by AD 75–20– 

06): Within the next 100 hours time-inservice (TIS) after the last inspection 

completed by AD 75–20–06 or within the 

next 25 hours TIS after the effective date of 

this AD, whichever occurs later, and 

repetitively thereafter at intervals not to 

exceed 100 hours TIS, visually inspect the aft 

fuselage truss for cracks as specified in 

paragraph 4. INSPECTION of Alexandria 

Aircraft LLC Bellanca Service Letter 85, 

Revision B, dated April 8, 2004. 

(2) Models 14–19–3A, 17–30, 17–30A, 17– 

31, 17–31A, 17–31ATC, and 17–31TC 

airplanes, all S/Ns not referenced in 

paragraph (g)(1) of this AD (airplanes not 

previously affected by AD 75–20–06): Before 

or upon the accumulation of 300 hours timein-service (TIS) or within the next 25 hours 

TIS after the effective date of this AD, 

whichever occurs later, and repetitively 

thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 hours 

TIS, visually inspect the aft fuselage truss for 

cracks as specified in paragraph 4. 

INSPECTION of Alexandria Aircraft LLC 

Bellanca Service Letter 85, Revision B, dated 

April 8, 2004. 

(h) Replacement 

If cracks are found during any inspection 

required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of 

this AD, before further flight, replace the 

cracked parts with FAA-approved zero-time 

parts as specified in paragraph 5. REPAIR of 

Alexandria Aircraft LLC Bellanca Service 

Letter 85, Revision B, dated April 8, 2004. 

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Chicago Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) AMOCs approved for AD 75–20–06, 

Amendment 39–2372 (40 FR 13184, 

September 22, 1975) are not approved as 

AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of 

this AD. 

(j) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Steven Rosenfeld, Aerospace 

Engineer, FAA, Chicago ACO, 2300 East 

Devon Avenue, Room 107, Des Plaines, IL 

60018; phone: (847) 294–7030; fax: (847) 

294–7834; email: steven.rosenfeld@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Alexandria Aircraft LLC, 

2504 Aga Drive, Alexandria, MN 5630; 

phone: (320) 763–4088; fax: (320) 763–4095; 

Internet: www.bellanca-aircraft.com; email: 

partsales@bellanca-aircraft.com. You may 

view this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 

Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 

24, 2014. 

Timothy Smyth, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–15525 Filed 7–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0672; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–058–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM); 

reopening of comment period. 

SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier 

proposed airworthiness directive (AD) 

for certain The Boeing Company Model 

767–200, –300, –300F, and –400ER 

airplanes. The NPRM proposed to 

require an inspection of the wing fuel 

tank access doors to determine whether 

impact-resistant access doors are 

installed in the correct locations, and to 

replace incorrectly installed doors with 

impact-resistant access doors. The 

NPRM also proposed to require an 

inspection for stencils and index 

markers on impact-resistant access 

doors, and application of new stencils 

or index markers if necessary. In 

addition, the NPRM proposed to require 

revising the maintenance program to 

incorporate changes to the airworthiness 

limitations section. The NPRM was 

prompted by reports indicating that a 

standard access door was located where 

an impact-resistant access door was 

required, and stencils were missing 

from some impact-resistant access 

doors. This action revises the NPRM by 

adding airplanes to the applicability. 

We are proposing this supplemental 

NPRM (SNPRM) to prevent foreign 

object penetration of the fuel tank from 

uncontained engine failure or tire 

debris, which could cause a fuel leak 

near an ignition source (e.g., hot brakes 

or engine exhaust nozzle), consequently 

leading to a fuel-fed fire. Since these 

actions impose an additional burden 

over that proposed in the NPRM, we are 

reopening the comment period to allow 

the public the chance to comment on 

these proposed changes. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this SNPRM by August 18, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 

206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206– 

766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2013– 

0672; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6438; fax: 

425–917–6590; email: suzanne.lucier@

faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37682 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0672; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–058–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to The Boeing Company Model 

767–200, –300, –300F, and –400ER 

series airplanes. The NPRM published 

in the Federal Register on August 12, 

2013 (78 FR 48826). The NPRM 

proposed to require an inspection of the 

left- and right-hand wing fuel tank 

access doors to determine whether 

impact-resistant access doors are 

installed in the correct locations, and to 

replace incorrectly installed doors with 

impact-resistant access doors. The 

NPRM also proposed to require an 

inspection for stencils and index 

markers on impact-resistant access 

doors, and application of new stencils 

or index markers if necessary. In 

addition, the NPRM proposed to require 

revising the maintenance program to 

incorporate changes to the airworthiness 

limitations section. 

Actions Since NPRM (78 FR 48826, 

August 12, 2013) Was Issued 

Since we issued the NPRM (78 FR 

48826, August 12, 2013), we have 

determined that more airplanes are 

subject to the unsafe condition. This 

includes all airplanes delivered prior to 

the release of the critical design 

configuration control limitation 

(CDCCL) Task 57–AWL–01, ‘‘ImpactResistant Fuel Tank Access Door,’’ of 

Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations 

(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance 

Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 767 

Maintenance Planning Data Document 

D622T001–9, Revision January 2013. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

comment on the NPRM (78 FR 48826, 

August 12, 2013). The following 

presents the comments received on the 

NPRM and the FAA’s response to each 

comment. 

Request To Include Revised Service 

Information 

Boeing requested that we revise the 

NPRM (78 FR 48826, August 12, 2013) 

to include Boeing Service Bulletin 767– 

28–0105, Revision 1, dated February 6, 

2013, which revises the applicability 

from line numbers 1 through 984 to line 

numbers 1 through 1039. This will 

include all airplanes delivered prior to 

the release of the Maintenance Planning 

Data (MPD) update to contain CDCCL 

Task 57–AWL–01, ‘‘Impact-Resistant 

Fuel Tank Access Door,’’ of Section 9, 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs) of Boeing 767 Maintenance 

Planning Data Document D622T001–9, 

Revision October 2012, which makes 

sure the impact-resistant access doors 

are installed at the correct locations per 

ongoing maintenance actions. 

We agree with the request to include 

Boeing Service Bulletin 767–28–0105, 

Revision 1, dated February 6, 2013, in 

this SNPRM. The references specified in 

paragraphs (c) and (g) of this SNPRM 

have been revised accordingly. We have 

also added new paragraph (j) to this 

SNPRM to provide credit for actions 

required by paragraph (g) of this SNPRM 

using Boeing Service Bulletin 767–28– 

0105, dated January 12, 2012. In 

addition, we have re-designated the 

subsequent paragraphs accordingly. For 

information on the procedures and 

compliance times, see this service 

information at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0672. 

Request To Withdraw the NPRM (78 FR 

48826, August 12, 2013) 

American Airlines (AAL) requested 

that the NPRM (78 FR 48826, August 12, 

2013) be withdrawn. AAL stated that 

the NPRM is unnecessary and 

redundant due to existing mandated 

actions. AAL stated that AD 2008–11– 

01, Amendment 39–15523 (73 FR 

29414, May 21, 2008), requires the 

incorporation of CDCCL Task 57–AWL– 

01, ‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank Access 

Door,’’ of Section 9, Airworthiness 

Limitations (AWLs) and Certification 

Maintenance Requirements (CMRs) of 

Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning Data 

Document D622T001–9, Revision 

October 2012, which is also proposed 

for incorporation by the NPRM. AAL 

stated that due to the presence of 

Subsection D in Section 9, the 

subsequent revisions and FAA 

approvals of Section 9 have already 

mandated that AAL’s maintenance 

program include the requirements of 

CDCCL 57–AWL–01. Similarly AAL 

stated that the requirements of AD 

2010–06–10, Amendment 39–16234 (75 

FR 15322, March 29, 2010); and AD 

2011–25–05, Amendment 39–16881 (77 

FR 2442, January 18, 2012); also make 

this NPRM unnecessary. 

We disagree with the request to 

withdraw the NPRM (78 FR 48826, 

August 12, 2013). The three ADs the 

commenter specified do not require 

incorporating CDCCL 57–AWL–01. 

However, we acknowledge that 

subsequent alternative methods of 

compliance (AMOCs) to those ADs 

could lead to incorporation of 

Subsection D of Section 9 because 

AMOCs written to allow use of 

subsequent revisions of MPD Section 9 

were also written to require complete 

incorporation of the later publication of 

Section 9, Subsection D, into the 

maintenance program. Incorporation of 

AMOCs to other ADs, which is the 

mechanism leading to full incorporation 

of Subsection D, is voluntary by the 

operator. Without an AD to require this 

AWL task, an operator would only be 

required to comply with ADs that do not 

require incorporation of this task. 

We have added new paragraph (k)(4) 

to this SNPRM to allow AMOCs 

approved after November 2, 2012, for 

AD 2008–11–01 R1, Amendment 39– 

16145 (74 FR 68515, December 28, 

2009); AD 2010–06–10, Amendment 39– 

16234 (75 FR 15322, March 29, 2010); 

and AD 2011–25–05, Amendment 39– 

16881 (77 FR 2442, January 18, 2012); 

to be approved as AMOCs for the 

corresponding provisions of paragraph 

(h) of this SNPRM. 

Request To Allow Credit 

AAL requested that we allow credit 

for maintenance tasks already 

incorporated to satisfy the requirements 

of CDCCL Task 57–AWL–01, ‘‘ImpactResistant Fuel Tank Access Door,’’ of 

Section 9, Airworthiness Limitations 

(AWLs) and Certification Maintenance 

Requirements (CMRs) of Boeing 767 

Maintenance Planning Data Document 

D622T001–9, Revision October 2012. 

AAL stated that during its maintenance 

check schedule it verified that the 

panels are impact resistant and were 

inspected for correct markings, which 

satisfies the actions required by the 

NPRM (78 FR 48826, August 12, 2013). 

We agree to allow credit for actions 

accomplished using CDCCL Task 57– 

AWL–01, ‘‘Impact-Resistant Fuel Tank 

Access Door,’’ of Section 9, 

Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs) of Boeing 767 Maintenance 

Planning Data Document D622T001–9, 

Revision October 2012. Paragraph (f) of 

this SNPRM would require compliance 

within the compliance times specified, 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 37683 

unless already done; therefore, no 

change has been made to this SNPRM in 

this regard. 

Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) 

Winglet Comment for ST01920SE 

Aviation Partners Boeing stated that 

the installation of winglets per STC 

ST01920SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/

Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/

rgstc.nsf/0/59027F43B9A

7486E86257B1D006591EE

?OpenDocument&Highlight=st01920se) 

does not affect the accomplishment of 

the manufacturer’s service instructions. 

Clarification of Unsafe Condition 

We have clarified the unsafe 

condition specified in the SUMMARY and 

paragraph (e) of this SNPRM by adding 

the text, ‘‘from uncontained engine 

failure or tire debris.’’ 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this SNPRM 

because we evaluated all the relevant 

information and determined the unsafe 

condition described previously is likely 

to exist or develop in other products of 

the same type design. Certain changes 

described above expand the scope of the 

NPRM (78 FR 48826, August 12, 2013). 

As a result, we have determined that it 

is necessary to reopen the comment 

period to provide additional 

opportunity for the public to comment 

on this SNPRM. 

Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM 

This SNPRM would require 

accomplishing the actions specified in 

the service information identified 

previously. This SNPRM would add 

airplanes to the applicability. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 436 airplanes of U.S. registry. We 

estimate the following costs to comply 

with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on 

U.S. operators 

Inspection ................................ Up to 7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 ........................... $0 $595 $259,420 

Maintenance program revision 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ......................................... $0 $85 $37,060 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary replacements that would 

be required based on the results of the 

proposed inspection. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need these replacements: 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Replacement per door ..................... 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ........................................................ $8,000 $8,255 

Stencil and index marker ................. 9 work-hours × $85 per hour = $765 ........................................................ $0 $765 

According to the manufacturer, some 

of the costs of this proposed AD may be 

covered under warranty, thereby 

reducing the cost impact on affected 

individuals. We do not control warranty 

coverage for affected individuals. As a 

result, we have included all costs in our 

cost estimate. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0672; Directorate Identifier 2013– 

NM–058–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by August 18, 

2014. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
37684 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 767–200, –300, –300F, and –400ER 

series airplanes; certificated in any category; 

as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767– 

28–0105, Revision 1, dated February 6, 2013. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 28, Fuel. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by reports 

indicating that a standard access door was 

located where an impact-resistant access 

door was required, and stencils were missing 

from some impact-resistant access doors. We 

are issuing this AD to prevent foreign object 

penetration of the fuel tank from uncontained 

engine failure or tire debris, which could 

cause a fuel leak near an ignition source (e.g., 

hot brakes or engine nozzle), consequently 

leading to a fuel-fed fire. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspections 

Within 72 months after the effective date 

of this AD, do the actions specified in 

paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767– 

28–0105, Revision 1, dated February 6, 2013. 

(1) Do either a general visual inspection or 

ultrasonic non-destructive test of the left- and 

right-hand wing fuel tank access doors to 

determine whether impact-resistant access 

doors are installed in the correct locations. If 

any standard access door is found, before 

further flight, replace with an impactresistant access door. 

(2) Do a general visual inspection of the 

left- and right-hand wing fuel tank impactresistant access doors to verify stencils and 

index markers are applied. If a stencil or 

index marker is missing, before further flight, 

apply a stencil or index marker, as 

applicable. 

(h) Maintenance or Inspection Program 

Revision 

Within 60 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the maintenance or inspection 

program, as applicable, to incorporate critical 

design configuration control limitation 

(CDCCL) Task 57–AWL–01, ‘‘ImpactResistant Fuel Tank Access Door,’’ of Section 

9, Airworthiness Limitations (AWLs) and 

Certification Maintenance Requirements 

(CMRs) of Boeing 767 Maintenance Planning 

Data Document D622T001–9, Revision 

January 2013. 

(i) No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or 

CDCCLs 

After accomplishing the revision required 

by paragraph (h) of this AD, no alternative 

actions (e.g., inspections), intervals, and/or 

CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, 

intervals, and/or CDCCLs are approved as an 

alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in 

accordance with the procedures specified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. 

(j) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of this AD using Boeing Service 

Bulletin 767–28–0105, dated January 12, 

2012, which is not incorporated by reference 

in this AD. 

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) AMOCs for ADs 2008–11–01 R1, 

Amendment 39–16145 (74 FR 68515, 

December 28, 2009); 2010–06–10, 

Amendment 39–16234 (75 FR 15322, March 

29, 2010); or 2011–25–05, Amendment 39– 

16881 (77 FR 2442, January 18, 2012); that 

meet the conditions specified in paragraphs 

(k)(4)(i) and (k)(4)(ii) of this AD are approved 

as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions 

of paragraph (h) of this AD. 

(i) AMOCs that are approved after 

November 2, 2012. 

(ii) AMOCS that include incorporation of 

CDCCL Task 57–AWL–01, ‘‘Impact-Resistant 

Fuel Tank Access Door.’’ 

(l) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Suzanne Lucier, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, Seattle 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–917–6438; fax: 425–917–6590; 

email: suzanne.lucier@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may view this referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 25, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–15530 Filed 7–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0428; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–067–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; the Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 787–8 

airplanes. This proposed AD was 

prompted by reports of deficiencies in 

the flight control module (FCM) 

software. This proposed AD would 

require installing certain FCM software. 

We are proposing this AD to correct 

deficiencies in the FCM software, 

which, if not corrected, could prevent 

continued safe flight and landing. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by August 18, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS