alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Entravision Communications Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                          
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ WALTER F. ULLOA                      
|                   |  | Walter F. Ulloa Chief Executive Officer  
|                   | 
|Date: May 10, 2007 |  | /s/ JOHN F. DELORENZO                    
|                   |  | John F. DeLorenzo Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
 Date: November 14, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Robert E. BiesRobert E. BiesExecutive Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
#### BUILDERS BARGAIN CENTER, INC., Appellant, v. NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 14436.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 12, 1966.

*805Werner A. Gohmert, Alice, for appellant.

Lon D. Herbert, Alice, for appellee.

CADENA, Justice.

The trial court rendered judgment against Builders Bargain Center, Inc., defendant, in a suit upon a sworn account filed by National Gypsum Company. Appellant here contends that the court erred in entering such judgment because the affidavit supporting plaintiff’s petition does not state that the facts sworn to are true “within the knowledge of affiant,” as required by Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.

This is not a default judgment case. Appellant filed an unsworn general denial and was present at the hearing on the merits. No exception was filed in the trial court questioning the sufficiency of the affidavit.

Rule 90, T.R.C.P., provides that, except in the case of a default judgment, every defect, omission or fault in a pleading, whether of form or substance, shall be deemed to have been waived and shall not be ground for reversal, unless complaint is made in the trial court. The objection urged by appellant cannot be made for the first time on appeal. Maxwell v. Winner Gas Stove Co., Tex.Civ.App., 263 S.W. 944, no writ.

The petition was introduced in evidence without objection by appellant. In addition, there was evidence showing that three officers of appellant corporation admitted that the account was owed. The evidence is sufficient to support the judgment.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of Periodic Financial Report by the Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Entravision Communications Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, based on our
knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ WALTER F. ULLOA    
|                     |  |  |  | Walter F. Ulloa        
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ JOHN F. DELORENZO  
|                     |  |  |  | John F. DeLorenzo      
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Global Casinos, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Todd Huss _____________ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer October 9, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information 
extracted from the consolidated balance sheet and statements of income
filed as part of the report on form 10KSB for the year ended
October 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by 
reference to such report on form 10KSB.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,156,664
<SECURITIES>                                   377,560
<RECEIVABLES>                                  803,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    360,227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,078,853
<PP&E>                                       2,769,364        
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,029,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,592,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          834,365
<BONDS>                                      2,528,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           839
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,228,713  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,592,885
<SALES>                                      4,587,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,699,298  
<CGS>                                        1,578,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,138,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,193,780)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (829,969)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,363,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,363,811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.17)
        



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-4189

___________

Charles E. Duchek, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Ethyl Corporation, a corporation; *

Ethyl Petroleum Additives, Inc., a * [UNPUBLISHED]

corporation; Barry Abrahamson, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 15, 1999

 Filed: November 12, 1999 

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Charles E. Duchek appeals the portion of the district court’s order dismissing,

upon removal, various state law claims. The corporate appellees concede that, given

the district court’s ruling that diversity of citizenship was lacking, the court was

precluded from dismissing the claims against them before remanding the case to state

court. We now vacate the dismissal portion of the district court’s order because it was

rendered without diversity jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
      10.28




**AMENDMENT
      TO EXECUTIVE**


**EMPLOYMENT
      AGREEMENT**





WHEREAS,
      effective January 1, 2007, CAPITAL GOLD CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
      (“Employer”), and J. SCOTT HAZLITT, a Colorado resident (“Executive”), entered
      into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”); and





WHEREAS, on
      July
      17, 2008, based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the
      Company’s Board of Directors, the Board of Directors increased the salaries of
      our executive officers ;





NOW,
      THEREFORE, to effectuate the foregoing change in salary for Executive, Employer
      and Executive agree:





1.  Section
      3(a) of the Agreement is amended effective August 1, 2008 and, as amended,
      reads
      as follows:





(a)  *Base
      Salary* .
      As
      compensation for the services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Employer
      agrees to pay Executive a base salary at an annual rate of not less than
      $155,250, payable in installments in accordance with Employer’s standard payroll
      practices, subject to such payroll and withholding deductions as are required
      by
      law or authorized by Executive. The amount of the base salary shall be reviewed
      periodically and may be increased at the sole discretion of Employer.





2.  All
      other
      terms of the Agreement remain the same.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this amendment to the Agreement
      effective July 17, 2008.





EMPLOYER
                :CAPITAL
                GOLD CORPORATIONBy:
            s/Gifford
                A. DieterleGifford
                A Dieterle, President





EXECUTIVE:s/J.
                Scott HazlittJ.
                Scott Hazlitt
II 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1308 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 13, 2011 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission Act 

to extend the termination date for the Commission, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1308 RDS

1 SECTION 1. RONALD REAGAN CENTENNIAL COMMISSION 

2 ACT AMENDMENTS. 

3 (a) FINAL REPORT DUE DATE.—Section 7(c) of the 

4 Ronald Reagan Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 

5 111–25; 36 U.S.C. 101 note prec.) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘April 30, 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘November 30, 2011’’. 

7 (b) TERMINATION.—Section 8 of the Ronald Reagan 

8 Centennial Commission Act (Public Law 111–25; 36 

9 U.S.C. 101 note prec.) is amended by striking ‘‘May 30, 

10 2011’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2011’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 12, 2011. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
#### Proctor Virgil WATSON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 13, 1955.

, Elijah M. Hogge, Morehead, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson,.Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant has filed a motion for an appeal from a judgment upon a conviction for unlawfully having in possession intoxi-,eating liquor for sale in local option terrir tory. The punishment was fixed at a $100 fine and thirty days in jail. The record has been examined and no prejudicial error has been found.

The motion for appeal is denied, and the judgment is affirmed..
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2013-13233]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 50, 51, 70 and 71

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0885, FRL-9810-3]
RIN 2060-AR34

Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards 
for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2013-13233 appearing on pages 34178 
through 34239 in the issue of Thursday, June 6, 2013, make the 
following correction.
    1. On page 34234, in the first column, on the twenty-fifth line 
from the bottom, ``PART 50--NATIONAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AXVYGH9'' is 
corrected to appear as set forth below:

PART 50--NATIONAL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AMBIENT AIR QUALITY 
STANDARDS [CORRECTED]

[FR Doc. C1-2013-13233 Filed 8-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
EXHIBIT 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Michael Edison, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hesperia Holding, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

          (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

          (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

          (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

          (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

          (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

| Date: | September 9, 2005 |
|-------|-------------------|

 

/s/ MichaelEdison                          

Michael Edison

Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,**

**UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Raybor Management Inc. (the “Company”), in hiscapacity and as of the date set forth below, does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “10-QSBReport”) that to his knowledge: 

 

(1)    the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)    the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: May 15, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1309

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF JIM JOHNSON; 

OFFICER ROBERT LONG; OFFICER DOYLE; OFFICER BUTTONS; OFFICER 

JACKSON; OFFICER DUNNING; OFFICER COVINGTON; OFFICER 

THOMPSON; OFFICER MAYBIN; OFFICER SEWELL; OFFICER POWERS; 

OFFICER SMITH; OFFICER FAIM; OFFICER BRUCE; UNKNOWN OFFICERS 

AND AGENTS, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:09-

cv-00299)) 

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 4, 2009 

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., filed a complaint 

against the Baltimore County Police Department and several 

officers, alleging violations of his civil rights. The district 

court entered an order granting Wilder leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, denying without prejudice his motion for appointment 

of counsel, and placing his case on inactive status pending 

resolution of cases Wilder has on the court’s active docket. 

Wilder seeks to appeal, challenging the denial of his motion for 

appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction 

only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541 (1949). Because the denial of a motion for 

appointment of counsel is not immediately appealable, Miller v. 

Simmons, 814 F.2d 962, 967 (4th Cir. 1987), we dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1307 

To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force or effect, and 

to prohibit the use of funds for certain purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2011 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. 

GALLEGLY, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mrs. MYRICK, and Mr. 

GARY G. MILLER of California) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide that Executive Order 13166 shall have no force 

or effect, and to prohibit the use of funds for certain 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF EFFECT OF EXECUTIVE 

4 ORDER. 

5 Executive Order 13166, ‘‘Improving Access to Serv6 ices for Persons with Limited English Proficiency’’ (Au7 gust 16, 2000; 65 Fed. Reg. 50121), is null and void and 

8 shall have no force or effect. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1307 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS FOR CER2 TAIN PURPOSES. 

3 No funds appropriated pursuant to any provision of 

4 law may be used to promulgate or enforce any executive 

5 order that creates an entitlement to services provided in 

6 any language other than English. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1495 

To provide for an audit of all gold owned by the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2011 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To provide for an audit of all gold owned by the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Reserve Trans5 parency Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ASSAY, INVENTORY, AND AUDIT OF GOLD RE7 SERVES. 

8 (a) The Secretary of the Treasury is directed to con9 duct and complete, not later than six months after the 

10 date of enactment of this Act, a full assay, inventory, and 

11 audit of gold reserves of the United States at the place 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 1495 IH

1 or places where such reserves are kept, together with an 

2 analysis of the sufficiency of the measures taken for the 

3 security of such reserves. 

4 (b)(1) The Government Accountability Office shall re5 view the results of such assay, inventory, audit, and anal6 ysis and, not later than nine months after the date of en7 actment of this Act, shall prepare and transmit to the 

8 Congress a report of its findings, together with the results 

9 of the assay, inventory, audit, and analysis conducted by 

10 the Secretary of the Treasury. 

11 (2) For purposes of such assay, inventory, audit, and 

12 analysis, the Government Accountability Office shall have 

13 access to any depository or other facility where such re14 serves are kept. 

15 (c) The Secretary of the Treasury shall make avail16 able, in order to facilitate the review of the Government 

17 Accountability Office under this Act, all books, accounts, 

18 records, reports, files, correspondence, memoranda, pa19 pers, or any other document, tape, or written, audio, or 

20 digital record pertaining to the assay, inventory, audit, 

21 and analysis required by this Act, as determined by the 

22 Government Accountability Office. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS