alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1356 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1356

 To provide amortization authority in certain situations, for purposes 
  of capital calculation under the Financial Institutions Examination 
        Council's Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 4, 2011

 Mr. Perlmutter (for himself, Mr. Coffman of Colorado, Mr. Tipton, and 
 Mr. Gardner) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide amortization authority in certain situations, for purposes 
  of capital calculation under the Financial Institutions Examination 
        Council's Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Capital Access for Main Street Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LOAN LOSS AMORTIZATION.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of capital calculation under the 
Financial Institutions Examination Council's Consolidated Reports of 
Condition and Income, an insured depository institution with assets of 
less than $10,000,000,000 may choose to amortize any loss or write-
down, on a quarterly straight-line basis over the 7-year period 
beginning with the month in which such loss or write-down occurs, 
incurred with respect to--
            (1) a loan secured by commercial real estate; or
            (2) other real estate owned.
    (b) Effective Date.--The provisions of this section shall apply 
with respect to capital calculations under Consolidated Reports of 
Condition and Income made for losses and write-downs referred to in 
subsection (a) that occur during the 3-year period beginning on the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Definitions.--For purposes of this section:
            (1) Insured depository institution.--The term ``insured 
        depository institution'' shall have the meaning given such term 
        under section 3(c)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 
        U.S.C. 1813(c)(2)).
            (2) Other real estate owned.--The term ``other real estate 
        owned'' shall have the meaning given such term under section 
        34.81 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EMPLOYMENT SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL
GENERAL RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS
 Agreement Executive Company
 RECITALS
 Employment Arrangement
   AGREEMENT
  Employment Status; Transition
 Resignation Date




---



##### 



Consideration for Signing Agreement
      Effective Date
  2
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



Personal Time-Off and Other Benefits
 Mutual General Release
  3
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



Mutual Release of Unknown Claims
   Rights Under the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act
 et seq.
    4
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



Confidentiality of Agreement
 Proprietary Information Clause
 Unfair Competition
   No Lawsuits
 Cooperation Clause
 5
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



Non-disparagement
 Breach of Agreement
 Remedy for Executives Breach
 Encouragement to Consult with Attorney; Tax Matters
 Miscellaneous Provisions
   6
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



7
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



8
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



STRATAGENE CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Joseph A. Sorge, M.D./s/ Ronni L. Sherman
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    JOSEPH A. SORGE, M.D.RONNI L. SHERMAN
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    CEODated:October 6, 2006
    
    
    
    Dated:October 6, 2006
 9




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 FORM OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
   AGREEMENT
  Consultant Services
 Compensation
   Exhibit A-1
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



Independent Contractor
 Cooperation
 Proprietary/Privileged Information Clause
 Exhibit A-2
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



Remedies for Breach
 Termination
 Non-Waiver of Breach
 Non-Assignment
 Miscellaneous Provisions
      Exhibit A-3
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



CONSULTANT
    
    
    
    THE COMPANYSTRATAGENE CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporationBy:Ronni L. Sherman
    
    
    
    Name:Title:Date:
    
    
    
    
    
    Date:
 Exhibit A-4




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B
 
   [THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
 Exhibit B-1
    
    Initial:




---



##### 



Dated: October 13, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Ronni L. ShermanRonni L. ShermanDated: October 13, 2006
    
    
    
    STRATAGENE CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Steve MartinName:
    
    Steve MartinTitle:
    
    Vice President and CFO
 Exhibit B-2
    
    Initial:
#### Medford BENNETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 38721.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 24, 1965.

Cox & Hurt by Joe L. Cox, Plainview, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDONALD, Presiding Judge.

The offense is selling beer in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $500.00.

The state does not seek an affirmance of this case because the trial court failed to charge the jury on the law relative to presumption of innocence and reasonable doubt. A proper objection and exception was taken to the court’s ruling. For a discussion of the principle controlling the charge of the court on the presumption of innocence, see Johnson v. State, 27 Tex.App. 163, 11 S.W. 106; Gallaher v. State, 28 Tex.App. 247, 12 S.W. 1087; Johnson v. State, 29 Tex.App. 150, 15 S.W. 647; Hurley v. State, 30 Tex.App. 333, 17 S.W. 455. We held in Harris v. State, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 36, 198 S.W.2d 1020, that failure to give requested instruction that every defendant in a criminal case is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt was error. “The presumption of innocence is the most valuable of the defendant’s rights, and it seems that a charge upon this subject is essential in every criminal case.” Sessums v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 563, 237 S.W.2d 629. Also see Walker v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 321, 174 S.W.2d 974.

Upon another trial, a proper charge on the subject should be given.

For the errors herein pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### Timothy Lynn ODOM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernest SUTTON, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-7832.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 4, 2003.

Timothy Lynn Odom, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Lynn Odom seeks to appeal the district court’s September 28, 2001, order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss the appeal as moot because the district court re-instated the petition after Odom paid the filing fee after dismissal. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6186
In Re: TEKOA T. GLOVER,

Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-03-2689) Submitted: March 12, 2004 Decided: April 13, 2004 Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tekoa T. Glover, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tekoa T. Glover petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Because we find that there has been no unreasonable delay, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and grant Glover’s motion to amend his petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF**

**THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert L.Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date: October 28, 2010 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT L.  HOWARD-ANDERSON         |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                        | Name:  | Robert L. Howard-Anderson              |
|                        | Title: | President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                        |   | (Principal Executive  Officer)         |

 

I, Jeanne Seeley, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. onForm 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and that information contained insuch Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of OccamNetworks, Inc.

 
| Date: October 28,  2010 | By:    | /s/ JEANNE SEELEY                                  |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Name:  | Jeanne Seeley                                      |
|                         | Title: | Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|                         |   | (Principal Financial and  Accounting Officer)      |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OccamNetworks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, Javier O. Lamoso, President of ClearComm, L.P., certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report ofClearComm, L.P.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)           Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: June 1, 2005

 
|   |   | /s/ Javier O. Lamoso    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Javier O. Lamoso        |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH 31, 2000 BALANCE SHEET
AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 200 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
[ARTICLE] 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         285,081
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    567,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               852,693
<PP&E>                                           7,216
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,515,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,795,138
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,080
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (303,178)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,515,040
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               107,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (123,875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (123,875)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (123,875)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.005)


</TABLE>
The file BARTModelingParameters.csv contains the modeling parameters that were

used for the CAMx screening modeling performed by Environ. For more information on this modeling see:
- the Draft Final Modeling Protocol, Screening Analysis of Potentially BART Eligible Sources in Texas, December 15, 2005 and; - the Draft Report, Screening Analysis of Potential BART - Eligible Sources in Texas, September 2006. The units of the modeling parameters are:
- STKHGT=feet, - STKDIAM=feet, - STKTEMP=Fahrenheit, - STKVEL=feet/second, - VOC=tons per year, - NOX=tons per year, - SO2=tons per year, - PM10=tons per year.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
  No.
(4)(1)  Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership
           (included in Partnership's Registration Statement No. 2-86262,
           declared effective on March 22, 1984 (the "Registration Statement")
           and incorporated herein by reference).

(4)(a)(2)  Seventeenth   Amendment  to  Amended  and  Restated  Certificate  and
           Agreement of Limited  Partnership  dated May 31, 1990 (included as an
           exhibit  to the  Partnership's  Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
           December 31, 1990 and incorporated herein by reference).

(4)(b)     Subscription Agreement (included as an Exhibit in the Registration
           Statement and incorporated herein by reference).
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 11331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03016]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20187; OREGON Disaster Number OR-20000 
Declaration of Economic Injury]


Administrative Declaration of an Economic Injury Disaster for the 
State of Oregon

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Oregon dated 02/08/2024.
    Incident: Winter Ice Storm.
    Incident Period: 01/12/2024 through 01/20/2024.

DATES: Issued on 02/08/2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/08/2024.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for disaster loans 
may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal https://lending.sba.gov or other locally announced locations. Please contact 
the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98fcf1ebf9ebecfdeafbedebecf7f5fdeaebfdeaeef1fbfdd8ebfaf9b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8dcd1cbd9cbccddcadbcdcbccd7d5ddcacbddcaced1dbddf8cbdad996dfd7ce">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for 
further assistance.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Clackamas, Clatsop, Lane, Lincoln, Multnomah, 
Washington.
Contiguous Counties:
    Oregon: Benton, Columbia, Deschutes, Douglas, Hood River, Klamath, 
Linn, Marion, Polk, Tillamook, Wasco, Yamhill.
    Washington: Clark, Pacific, Skamania, Wahkiakum.
    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere..      3.250
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 201870.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration are Oregon, 
Washington.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-03016 Filed 2-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# WASHOE COUNTYHEALTHDISTRICT AIRQUALITYMANAGEMENTDIVISION

September 22, 2011
Colleen Cripps, Ph.D. Administrator Division of Environmental Protection 901 South Stewart Street, Suite 4001 Carson City, Nevada 89701-5249 Dear Ms. Cripps: 

### PublicHealth Prevent. Promote. Protect.

Enclosed is a revision to the Washoe County portion of Nevada's Lead Infrastructure State Implementation Plan. This revision was adopted at a public hearing ofthe Washoe County District Board of Health (DBOH) on August 25, 2011. The submittal includes:
• Proof of publication for the public hearing; • DBOH agenda; • Staff report; • "The Washoe County Portion ofthe Nevada State Implementation Plan to Meet the Lead Infrastructure SIP Requirements of Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2)"; • Approved minutes from the public hearing; and • Certificate ofAdoption. Two paper and two electronic copies ofthe submittal are enclosed. The electronic copies are exact duplicates ofthe paper copy submittal in searchable.pdfformal. Please review these documents and determine if this submittal is complete. If so, then please forward the one paper and one electronic copy to the U.S. EPA Region IX office. Ifyou have any questions or comments regarding this submittal, feel free to contactMr. Daniel Inouye or me at (775) 784-7200. Sincerely, 

## 1'/" j'(}) 

# "£ 

# ;;jji/**4J/C/~!::/** 

## , Kevin Dick

Director

cc: Daniel Inouye, Washoe County Health District
- AQMD (w/o enclosures)
P.O. BOX 11130 Reno, NV 89520-0027· (775) 784-7200 • FAX (775) 784-7225 www.washoecounty.us/health WASHOE COUNTYISANEQUALOPPORTUNITYEMPLOYERHIRINGEMPLOYMENTELIGIDLEAPPLlCANTS Printed onRecycled Paper
P.1 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

53) ll-C-79 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:29 PM Sheet 53 of 343 
P.2 

A-&4-5* 

ll-C-7* 

Date sent: 

From: 

Subject: 

To: 

John: 

Tlie, 18 NOV 1997 09:42:24 -0500 

MADELEINE STRUM <STRUM.MADELEINE@epamail.epa.gOV> 

meeting summary of Oct 27 Pultrusion Meeting at EPA 

jschweit@socplas.org 

Here is the meeting summary from the Oct 27 pultrusion meeting. Please forward it to the industry attendees. As 

with all our summaries, it will be included in the docket for the reinforced plastic NESHAP. (If you see something that 

needs to be corrected as you did with the previous summary I sent you, let me know since we can make the 

changes before putting it into the docket.) 

Thank you for your fax of November 14 regarding the pultrusion meeting and removing the HAP content option, 

will thus not pursue the epoxy resin action item from the meeting. 

We 

Please note that we really need the list of criteria for the wet area enclosure as soon as possible because we want 

to bring it to our site visit to glasforms (which we were hoping to do before the end of the year - we've not yet set 

the date, but I've spoken to Terry about it.). Do you think it could possibly be sent to me this week or the beginning of 

next week? 

Thanks 

Madeleine 

**>»* 
P.3 

Docket No. A* J^%_\* 

Subcategory II- £ 

The enclosures with this document are identical to the enclosures with docket item II- P^ - 10 D 

-z