alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with  the  Quarterly
report of Lion Capital Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the period
ended  March 31, 2008 as filed with 
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy T.
Page,  Chief  Executive Officer  and
Chairman  of the Board of
Directors  of  the  Company,


certify,  pursuant
to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that:





1.   The  Report  fully  complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and





2.   The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,
in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and
results of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






Date:
      May 15, 2008
            
            /s/
      Timothy T. PageTimothy
      T. PageChief
      Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
STEPHEN JAMES WHITNER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT
ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
AND AMBER MARIE
ANDERSON

,

Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2509

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 14, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Department of Revenue

.

Stephen James Whitner, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee s

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS , C.J., BENTON and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### George ANTHONY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29546.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1958.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is rape; the punishment, five years.

 No statement of facts is found in the record, and the bills of exception found in the transcript show no claim of error which can be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts.

We further observe that the bills of exception were not filed within ninety days after notice of appeal, and direct attention to the absence of any statute now in force authorizing the trial judge to extend time for filing bills of exception or the statement of facts in the trial court. See Gist v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 593, 279 S.W.2d 100.

The judgment is affirmed.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 52

To provide that a justice or judge convicted of a felony shall be suspended

from office without pay.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that a justice or judge convicted of a felony

shall be suspended from office without pay.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 3 of title 28, United States Code, is amended

4 by—

5 (1) inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Whenever the’’;

6 (2) adding at the end thereof the following:

7 ‘‘(b) Justices of the Supreme Court shall hold office

8 during good behavior.

9 ‘‘(c) For purposes of the tenure or appointment of

10 a justice, the term ‘good behavior’ shall not include any
2

•S 52 IS

1 offense committed by a justice if the conviction of such

2 offense is punishable by death or imprisonment for a term

3 exceeding one year. Any justice convicted of such an of4 fense shall be suspended from office without pay pending

5 the disposition of impeachment proceedings.’’.

6 SEC. 2. Sections 44(b) and 134(a) of title 28, United

7 States Code, are each amended by adding at the end

8 thereof the following: ‘‘For purposes of the tenure or ap9 pointment of a judge, the term ‘good behavior’ shall not

10 include any offense committed by a judge if the conviction

11 of such offense is punishable by death or imprisonment

12 for a term exceeding one year. Any judge convicted of such

13 an offense shall be suspended from office without pay

14 pending the disposition of impeachment proceedings.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's Form 10-K for the fifty-two weeks ended May 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                                     1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                                           4,654
<SECURITIES>                                                     3,475
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   22,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     1,148
<INVENTORY>                                                     26,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                58,740
<PP&E>                                                          45,423
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  23,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  90,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           17,143
<BONDS>                                                            606
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         1,003
<OTHER-SE>                                                      70,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    90,706
<SALES>                                                        102,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               102,884
<CGS>                                                           65,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   65,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                42,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   286
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 694
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (5,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      (433)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (5,967)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (5,967)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     (.60)
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-1371

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Anthony C. Deloney

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: August 2, 2013

Filed: August 5, 2013

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Deloney pleaded guilty to possessing stolen firearms, knowing or

having reasonable cause to believe that at least one was stolen, in violation of 18
U.S.C. §§ 922(j) and 924(a)(2). The district court1

 sentenced him to 100 months in

prison and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, Deloney’s counsel has moved

to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

arguing that the court erred in denying Deloney’s motion to suppress evidence and in

imposing the 100-month sentence.

Counsel’s arguments fail. Deloney’s guilty plea foreclosed a challenge to the

ruling on his motion to suppress because the plea agreement did not preserve any right

to appeal the ruling, see United States v. Limley, 510 F.3d 825, 827 (8th Cir. 2007),

and the court did not abuse its discretion in imposing the 100-month sentence, which

was at the bottom of the unobjected-to Guidelines range, see United States v.

Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461, 464 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). 

After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

______________________________

1

The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191 03-2029

The Honorable E. Christopher Abruzzo, Acting Secretary Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building 400 Market Street Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101
Dear Acting Secretary Abruzzo: 

### AUG 07 2013

On July 24,2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department ofEnvironmental Protection (PADEP). This SIP revision pertains to the update ofthe Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) for the Reading Eight-Hour Ozone Maintenance Area's Maintenance Plan. Revisions to the MVEBs consist of an update to the budgets with the use ofthe MOVES20 10 model. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a direct fmal rulemaking notice. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr, at 215- 814-2071. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

cc: Ms. Joyce E. Epps, Director Bureau ofAir Quality, PADEP Sincerely,

-;**~/'** / ;



# - ! "I
. /' 7"/:·), 

## 'A' ..,V /,I #f'

-**~ ~**  - Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division**~·** tt1 Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper witlr 100%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1512 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1512

 To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the representatives of the 
   Federal Reserve banks from membership on the Federal Open Market 
                               Committee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 13, 2011

  Mr. Frank of Massachusetts introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Reserve Act to remove the representatives of the 
   Federal Reserve banks from membership on the Federal Open Market 
                               Committee.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANK REPRESENTATIVES FROM FOMC.

    Section 12A of the Federal Reserve Act is amended by striking ``and 
five representatives of the Federal Reserve banks to be selected as 
hereinafter provided. Such representatives shall be presidents or first 
vice presidents of Federal Reserve banks and, beginning with the 
election for the term commencing March 1, 1943, shall be elected 
annually as follows: One by the board of directors of the Federal 
Reserve Bank of New York, one by the boards of directors of the Federal 
Reserve Banks of Boston, Philadelphia, and Richmond, one by the boards 
of directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Cleveland and Chicago, one 
by the boards of directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of Atlanta, 
Dallas, and St. Louis, and one by the boards of directors of the 
Federal Reserve Banks of Minneapolis, Kansas City, and San Francisco. 
In such elections each board of directors shall have one vote; and the 
details of such elections may be governed by regulations prescribed by 
the committee, which may be amended from time to time. An alternate to 
serve in the absence of each such representative shall likewise be a 
president or first vice president of a Federal Reserve bank and shall 
be elected annually in the same manner.'' and inserting a period.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 4933** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MICHAEL UYIOGHOSA OHANGBON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Thomas D
. Schroeder , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00346

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : March 30, 2012 Decided: April 17 , 2012

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

V acated and remanded by un publish ed per curiam opinion
.
David Bruce Freedman, CRUMPLER, FREEDMAN, PARKER & WITT, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Randall Stuart Galyon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Uyioghosa Ohangbon pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea agreement, to possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2006). Following a successful appeal, in which we affirmed the convictions but vacated the sentence, Ohangbon was resentenced to concurrent thirty

- month terms of imprisonment. In this appeal, O hangbon argues that his § 922(g) conviction is no longer valid in light of our decision in United States v. Simmons , 649 F.3d 237, 241 (4th Cir. 2011) (en banc).
In Simmons , we overruled United States v. Harp , 406 F.3d 242 (4th Cir. 2005), and held that a North Carolina state conviction may not be classified as punishable by a term of imprisonment exceeding one year based on the maximum aggravated sentence that could be imposed on a repeat offender if the individual defendant was not eligible for such a sentence. Simmons , 649 F.3d at 241, 243

- 48. Ohangbon’s § 922(g) conviction was supported by his North Carolina conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, a class I felony. See N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 90

- 95(b)(2), 90

- 94(1) (2011). Th e record does not include the state court judgment and it is not clear what Ohangbon’s prior record level was at his state sentencing. However, the3 record does reflect that Ohangbon was ultimately sentenced to a suspended sentence of six to eight months’ imprisonment. Accordingly, it appears that he could not have been sentenced to imprisonment for a term exceeding one year because even if he faced a minimum sentence of eight months, Ohangbon was exposed to a maximum term of imprisonment of no more than t en months.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A

- 1340.17 (d) (2003). Applying Simmons , it appears that Ohangbon did not have the requisite predicate offense to be convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm. We remand to the district court for the appropriate determination regarding this prior conviction. Accordingly, we vacate Ohangbon’s § 922(g) conviction and his sentence and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
Exhibit 32.1

         CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,
            UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony A. Lombardo, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
E-Z-EM, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

      1.    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
            ended May 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date August 29, 2003                    /s/ Anthony A. Lombardo
     ---------------                    ----------------------------------------
                                        Anthony A. Lombardo, President,
                                        Chief Executive Officer, Director


                                      -98-
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Global Casinos, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Clifford L. Neuman, President and Todd Huss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

__/s/ Clifford L. Neuman_______ Clifford L. Neuman President October 12, 2012  _/s/ Todd Huss ________________ Todd Huss Chief Financial Officer October 12, 2012
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A0 34 9 . AARON STRONG v . THE STATE

Ap p el l an t was co n v i ct ed o f fel o n y m u rd er, as w el l as t wo co u n t s o f ag g rav at ed

as s au l t , an d t wo co un t s o f p o ss es s i o n o f a k n i fe d u ri n g t he ag g rav at ed as s au l t s

.

Th e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ex cl u s i v e j u ri sd i ct i o n o v er fel on y m u rd er co nv i ct i o n s

. Th erefo re, Ap p el l an t ’ s M o t i o n To Tran s fer [t h i s ap p eal ] To Th e Geo rg i a Su p rem e Co u rt i s h ereb y GRANTED an d t h e ap p ea l i s T RANSFERRED t o t he Su p rem e Co u rt

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. September 12, 2019

09/12/2019
**EXHIBIT32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Bruker Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe three months ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Frank H.Laukien, as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board ofDirectors of the Company, and William J. Knight, as Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 9,  2009 |   | By:    |   /s/ FRANK H. LAUKIEN, PH.D.                                                                                         |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   |   |   Frank H. Laukien, Ph.D.   President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman   (Principal Executive Officer) |
|                         |   |   |                                                                                                                       |
| Date: November 9,  2009 |   | By:    |   /s/ WILLIAM J. KNIGHT                                                                                               |
|                         |   |   |   William J. Knight   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)                               |

 

----
#### B. T. WELBORN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29978.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1958.

Ervin Flowers, Duke Taylor, Baytown, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The information was in two counts, the second alleging the killing of Elvis Mason by appellant by negligence and carelessness while engaged in the unlawful act of operating a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated.

Both counts were submitted to the jury, and appellant was found “guilty as charged” and assessed a fine of $500.

It is well settled that it is a felony for an intoxicated driver of an automobile upon a public highway to kill another person by negligence, accident or mistake. Art. 802c Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; Jones v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 640, 274 S.W.2d 400; Munoz v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 331, 285 S.W.2d 729, and cases cited.

The authorities cited require that the conviction be set aside.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### Ex parte Louis Franklin AMMONS.

No. 28416.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 30, 1956.

Cal Estill, Fort Worth, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding by which relator seeks his discharge from the penitentiary because, upon his trial, the provisions of Art. 10a, Vernon’s Ann.C. C.P., touching his plea of guilty, were not complied with.

In all material aspects, this case is similar to that of Ex parte Foster, Tex.Cr.App., 283 S.W.2d 761.

*669For the reasons there stated, the writ of habeas corpus is granted and relator is ordered delivered to the sheriff of Jefferson County, Texas, to await the further order of the criminal district court of that county.