alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 21
                                                                      ----------

                        Homestead Village Incorporated
                    List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Name of Entity                                      Jurisdiction of Organization
--------------                                      ----------------------------

Homestead Village Management Incorporated           Delaware
Atlantic Homestead Village (1) Incorporated         Maryland
Atlantic Homestead Village (2) Incorporated         Maryland
Atlantic Homestead Village Limited Partnership      
 (a partnership owned by Atlantic Homestead        
 Village (1) Incorporated and by Atlantic           
 Homestead Village (2) Incorporated)                Delaware
PTR Homestead Village (1) Incorporated              Maryland
PTR Homestead Village (2) Incorporated              Maryland
PTR Homestead Village Limited Partnership 
 (a partnership owned by PTR Homestead Village 
 (1) Incorporated and by PTR Homestead Village 
 (2) Incorporated)                                  Maryland
Homestead Alabama Incorporated                      Alabama
Missouri Homestead Village Incorporated             Maryland
K.C. Homestead Village Redevelopment Corporation    Missouri
BTW Incorporated                                    Delaware
BTW II Incorporated                                 Delaware
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 eFunds Corporation
2001 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
(as amended July 1, 2006)
 ARTICLE I. INTRODUCTION
 Purpose
 Rules of Interpretation
 Definitions
 Acceleration Date
 Approved Retirement
 1




---



##### 



Board
 Committee
 Common Stock
 Company
 Current Compensation
 Disability
 Fair Market Value
 Participant
 Participating Subsidiary
 2




---



##### 



Plan
 Purchase Period
 Regular Full-Time Employee
 Stock Purchase Account
 Subsidiary
 ARTICLE II. ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION; INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPANTS
 Eligible Employees (4)
 Election to Participate
 3




---



##### 



Untimely Election to Participate
 Limits on Stock Purchase
 Voluntary Participation
 International Participants
 4




---



##### 



ARTICLE III. PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS, COMPANY  CONTRIBUTIONS AND STOCK PURCHASE ACCOUNT
 Deduction from Pay
 Adjustments of Deduction in Pay
 Credit to Account
 Interest
 Nature of Account
 No Additional Contributions
 ARTICLE IV. RIGHT TO PURCHASE SHARES
 Number of Shares
 5




---



##### 



Purchase Price
 ARTICLE V. EXERCISE OF RIGHT
 Purchase of Stock
 Return of Excess Credit Balance.
 Notice of Acceleration Date
 ARTICLE VI. WITHDRAWAL FROM PLAN; SALE OF STOCK
 Voluntary Withdrawal
 6




---



##### 



Death
 Termination of Employment
 7




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII. NONTRANSFERABILITY
 Nontransferable Right to Purchase
 Nontransferable Account
 Nontransferable Shares
 ARTICLE VIII. COMMON STOCK ISSUANCE
 Issuance of Purchased Shares
 Completion of Issuance
 8




---



##### 



Form of Ownership
 Delivery
 Securities Laws
 ARTICLE IX. EFFECTIVE DATE, AMENDMENT AND  TERMINATION OF PLAN
 Effective Date
 Plan Commencement
 Powers of Board
 Automatic Termination
 9




---



##### 



ARTICLE X. ADMINISTRATION
 The Committee
 Powers of Committee
 Power and Authority of the Board
 Stock to be Sold
 Notices
 
 ARTICLE XI. ADJUSTMENT FOR CHANGES IN STOCK OR COMPANY
 Stock Dividend or Reclassification
 10




---



##### 



Merger or Consolidation
 ARTICLE XII. APPLICABLE LAW
  11
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the  quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June
     30, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.


Date:  August 14, 2003

                                /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                -----------------------
                                Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                Chief Executive Officer
Consent of KPMG Audit Plc. independent auditors (filed herewith)



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
  
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

  
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-12718, 333-13928, 333-99783 and 333-108757) of Celltech Group plc of our report dated March 15, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Celltech Group plc as of December 31, 2003 and 2002
and the related consolidated profit and loss accounts, consolidated statements of total recognized gains and losses, the consolidated statements of cash flow and the consolidated statements of movements in shareholders’ funds for each of the
years in the two year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 20-F of Celltech Group plc. 
  
  
 Yours faithfully, 
  
  
 KPMG Audit Plc 
  
  
 London, England 
 June 24, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7052

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SAMUEL AUGUSTUS STEWART, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-95-63, CA-97-749-R) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel Augustus Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Burnham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Samuel Augustus Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Stewart , No. CR-95-63; CA-97-749-R (W.D. Va. May 5, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# COGNIGEN
NETWORKS, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Cognigen Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas S. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Thomas S. SmithThomas S. SmithChief Executive OfficerAugust 30, 2005
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         I, Shane Polson, have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Technol Fuel Conditioners, Inc.

1)       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
         untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
         necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
         under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by this quarterly report.

2)       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
         information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results from operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this quarterly report.


               By: /s/ Shane Polson                         DATE: March 14, 2006
                   ------------------------
                      Shane Polson
                      President, Acting Chief Operating Officer,
                      Treasurer, and Chairman
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1398 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to treat certain provider 

taxes as allowable costs for purposes of Medicare reimbursements to 

critical access hospitals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 6, 2011 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri (for himself and Mr. KIND) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to treat 

certain provider taxes as allowable costs for purposes 

of Medicare reimbursements to critical access hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Hospital Protec5 tion Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1398 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN PROVIDER TAXES TREATED AS ALLOW2 ABLE COSTS FOR PURPOSES OF MEDICARE 

3 CAH REIMBURSEMENTS. 

4 Section 1861(v)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 

5 U.S.C. 1395x(v)) is amended by adding at the end the 

6 following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(W) In determining such reasonable costs 

8 for critical access hospitals with respect to cost 

9 reporting periods beginning on or after January 

10 1, 2004, the Secretary shall include as allowable 

11 costs any health care related taxes, as defined 

12 in section 1903(w)(3). In computing the reason13 able costs with respect to such health care re14 lated taxes for purposes of the previous sen15 tence, the Secretary shall not offset against the 

16 amount of the tax assessments paid by a crit17 ical access hospital any amounts that the crit18 ical access hospital receives from a State if the 

19 Secretary has not determined that there is in 

20 effect a hold harmless provision, as described in 

21 section 1903(w)(4), with respect to the health 

22 care related tax.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1268 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1268

To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 
                              facilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2011

  Mrs. Lowey (for herself, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Maloney, and Mr. Hinchey) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide certain requirements for the licensing of commercial nuclear 
                              facilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Power Licensing Reform Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS.

    Section 103 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2133) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection b., by inserting ``, including that the 
        facility does not pose an unreasonable threat to persons or the 
        environment because of safety or security vulnerabilities 
        (including vulnerability to terrorist attacks), and that there 
        exist adequate evacuation plans for emergency events and that 
        those plans have been approved by the relevant Federal agencies 
        and States within 50 miles of the facility'' after ``by rule 
        establish''; and
            (2) in subsection c., by adding at the end the following: 
        ``Any such renewal shall be subject to the same criteria and 
        requirements that would be applicable for an original 
        application for initial construction, and the Commission shall 
        ensure that any changes in the size or distribution of the 
        surrounding population, or seismic or other scientific data not 
        available at time of original licensing, have not resulted in 
        the facility being located at a site at which a new facility 
        would not be allowed to be built.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1996
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         219,151
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               301,031
<PP&E>                                       1,414,770
<DEPRECIATION>                                 962,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 753,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     753,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   753,416
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               248,974
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   263,145
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Enix H. CARO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28667.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 12, 1956.

*534No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of sale in a dry area is the offense, with punishment assessed at a fine of $300.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception, without which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### J. C. (John C.) BRUCE et ux., Appellants, v. Mrs. Minnie Foster MOORE, Appellee.

No. 3527.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

April 11, 1958.

Watson C. Arnold, Waco, for appellants.

Bryan, Maxwell, Bryan & Wilson, Waco, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a suit involving a dispute as to the location of the property line between the residence of appellants and the residence of appellee, in Waco, Texas. See Bruce v. Moore, Tex.Civ.App., 277 S.W.2d 199, for former appeal. Trial resulted in judgment for appellee, and appellants appeal to this court. While such cause was pending in this court appellants filed a motion in which it was set forth that all matters in controversy between the parties had been settled and that appellants desire to dismiss this appeal.

From the foregoing it follows, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal in this cause should be, and same is hereby dismissed.

HALE, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 528 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 528

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
    documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for three vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 9 (legislative day, March 6), 1995

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
    documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for three vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COASTWISE TRADE AUTHORIZATION FOR HOVERCRAFT.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 U.S.C. App. 289), and 
sections 12106 and 12107 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with a 
coastwise endorsement for each of the vessels IDUN VIKING (Danish 
Registration number A433), LIV VIKING (Danish Registration number 
A394), and FREJA VIKING (Danish Registration number A395) if--
            (1) all repair and alteration work on the vessels necessary 
        to their operation under this section is performed in the 
        United States;
            (2) a binding contract for the construction in the United 
        States of at least 3 similar vessels for the coastwise trade is 
        executed by the owner of the vessels within 6 months after the 
        date of enactment of this Act; and
            (3) the vessels constructed under the contract entered into 
        under paragraph (1) are to be delivered within 3 years after 
        the date of entering into that contract.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1997
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         145,989
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,879
<PP&E>                                         954,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                 668,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 460,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     460,187
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   460,187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,761
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   185,144
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>