alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RULE 2:3

- Transfer. An Authority to Construct or a Permit to Operate shall not be transferable,t;hcther by operation of la\·1 or othPrw1se, eitherfrqm one location to another, from one piece ofequipment to another, orfrom one person ·to another.
Index of ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/ozwv

/Ozonesonde/

Up to higher level directory

Name Size Last Modified

1_Photos_Ozonesondes 9/29/2015 8:58:00 PM

Boulder, Colorado 5/30/2014 12:00:00 AM

Field Projects 10/28/2014 12:00:00 AM

Hilo, Hawaii 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM

Huntsville, Alabama 2/20/2014 12:00:00 AM

Narragansett, Rhode Island 7/8/2014 12:00:00 AM

Ozonesonde Instructions 6/25/2014 12:00:00 AM

Pago Pago, American Samoa 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM

San Cristobal, Galapagos 9/1/2015 6:06:00 PM

SkysondeWorkshop_2015_03_02.pptx 19468 KB 3/13/2015 12:00:00 AM

South Pole, Antartica 9/29/2015 3:55:00 PM

Summit, Greenland 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM

Suva, Fiji 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM

Thumbs.db 19 KB 8/27/2015 6:15:00 PM

Trinidad Head, California 2/20/2014 12:00:00 AM

fleoutREADME.docx 18 KB 8/28/2014 12:00:00 AM

Index of ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/ozwv/Ozonesonde/ ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/ozwv/Ozonesonde/

1 of 1 10/1/2015 2:14 PM
|    EXHIBIT      21                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SUBSIDIARIES      OF THE REGISTRANT                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                                                                                   |
| (1)  First      Security Bank is the bank subsidiary of the Company.  The      Company owns 100% of First Security Bank.           |
|                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)  Batesville      Security Building Corporation is the non-bank subsidiary of the      Company.   The Company owns 100% of |
|       Batesville      Security Building Corporation.                                                                     |

----
~~ 

DENVER 

INTERNATIONAL 

AIRPORT 

TOGETHER WE SOAR 

June 10, 2015 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket No. OST-2013-0204 

Dear Secretary Foxx: 

Department of Aviation 

Airport Office Building 

8500 Pefia Boulevard 

Denver, Colorado 80249 

303.342.2200 

www.flydenver.com 

Denver International Airport (DEN) writes to urge you to issue a final decision in the long-pending 

matter of Norwegian Air International's (NAI) application for a foreign air carrier permit. NAI's 

application has been complete since February 2014. DEN is well aware of concerns the European 

Commission has raised about this delay and its view that it constitutes a violation of the US-EU Open 

Skies agreement. We are concerned that further delay could prompt the Commission to take retaliatory 

action thereby putting current Denver-Europe air service at risk. 

In its Motion for Leave to File and Expedited Treatment, NAI voluntarily committed to only use US and 

European crews for transatlantic flights, as well as direct employees of the company for such flights. It is 

our understanding these two voluntary concessions may address fully concerns that opponents have 

raised about NAI's alternate labor model. If that is the case, the Department now will be in a position to 

issue a final decision and thereby eliminate the risk of European retaliation. Removing that cloud of 

concern and uncertainty would be welcome news for consumers and communities with European air 

service like Denver. 

Thank you for considering Denver International Airport's views in this important matter. Given the 

voluntary commitments NAI has made, we hope you will conclude the Department now is in a position 

to issue a decision on its pending foreign air carrier permit application. 

Sincerely, 

icer
January 5, 2016

Ryan T Stevens
DBA: REAL HOME PIX 949 Meadow Drive, Copper Canyon, TX 75077
Phone: 214-543-1039
Email: ryanstevensrealty@gmail.com

Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012

A. Operator’s Name: Ryan T. Stevens Operator’s Address: 949 Meadow Drive, Copper Canyon, TX 75077

B. SPECIFIC APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FROM WHICH RELIEF IS REQUIRED: -14 CFR §§ -61.23(a) and (c) -61.101(e)(4) and (5) -61.113(a) -61.315(a) -91.7(a) -91.119(c) -91.121 -91.151(a)(1) -91.405(a) -91.407(a)(1) -91.409(a)(1) and (2) -91.417(a) and (b)

C. HOW THE OPERATOR WILL MAINTAIN AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY OR NO ADVERSE IMPACT TO SAFETY:

1. PERFORM ROUTINE SOFTWARE/FIRMWARE UPDATES TO THE UAS, IT’S BATTERIES AND R/C. 2. PERFORM PRE-FLIGHT CHECKS OF THE UAS INSURING ALL HARDWARE AND PARTS ARE IN OPERABLE CONDITION. THIS WOULD INCLUDE THE UAS, IT’S PARTS(PROPELLERS, MOTORS, CAMERA, GIMBLE, LANDING MECHANISM), R/C, AND MONITORING DEVICE(IPAD,, IPHONE, TABLET, HDMI MONITOR) 3. INSURE THAT THE OPERATOR DOES NOT OPERATE THE AIRCRAFT UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL, DRUGS, OR PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION WHICH COULD IMPAIR HIS ABILITY TO FLY THE UAS SAFELY. 4. FLY IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FAA “SMALL UAS CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRATION”: 5. ATTEND CLASSES AND INSTRUCTION TO MAINTAIN AN UP TO DATE KNOWLEDGE AVIATION LAW AND UAS REGULATION AND FLIGHT SKILLS.6. ONLY FLY IN AIRSPACE WHEN GIVEN PERMISSION BY THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY.

D. HOW GRANTING EXEMPTION WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST:

- THE GENERAL PUBLIC WOULD BE ABLE TO ENJOY AERIAL VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPHY AFTER BEING CAPTURED WITH THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE REAL PROPERTY.

E. THE PROPOSED OPERATIONS:

-TO CAPTURE AERIAL IMAGES AND VIDEO OF REAL PROPERTY INCLUDING HOMES AND LAND FOR SALE, CAPTURE AERIAL IMAGES AND VIDEO OF CONSTRUCTION SITES INVOLVING RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES.

F. THE MAKE AND MODEL OF THE AIRCRAFT FOR PROPOSED OPERATIONS:

- DJI INSPIRE 1: MODEL T 600USING THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT AND SPECS; (see next page) Safety guidelines for flying your unmanned aircraft: • Fly below 400 feet • Never fly near other aircraft • Keep your UAS within visual line of sight • Keep away from emergency responders • Never fly over stadiums, sports events or groups of people • Never fly under the influence of drugs or alcohol • Never fly within 5 miles of an airport without first contacting air traffic control and airport authorities
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 15, 2017

t0912 

# Order

Clerk September 15, 2017

155034

- 5

MICHAEL J. BEDFORD,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155034

COA: 327372

Kent CC: 14

- 011752

- CZ

DEREK S. WITTE, JORDAN C. HOYER, and

LAW OFFICES OF JORDAN C. HOYER, PLLC,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

GARY STEWART, JR.,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 155035

COA: 327373

Kent CC: 14

- 011813

- CZ

DEREK S. WITTE, JORDAN C. HOYER, and

LAW OFFICES OF JORDAN C. HOYER, PLLC,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Cynthia M. Butitta, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Telik, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  | 
|--------------------- |  | 
|Date:  August 5, 2003 |  | 
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is a notice of the Military Reservist Economic Injury Disaster Loans interest rate for loans approved on or after January 29, 2024.

# DATES:

Issued on February 6, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Robert Blocker, Office of Financial Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 619-0477.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate for Military Reservist Economic Injury Disaster Loans (13 CFR 123.512) on a quarterly basis. The interest rate will be 4.000 for loans approved on or after January 29, 2024.

Robert Blocker,

Chief, Disaster Loan Policy Division, Office of Financial Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2024-02981 Filed 2-13-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
YOUP

thle Llbpartm8nt.

*lat. Ttie Bill wea introduosd b y Eon* .fP. ilb iMvi8, reprqrrentatiaa or thi.8

Matriotand prsesdbr the 45th Lsgialature br roqutm or oortaln

o~tiswnr

0r Xae er Countyund a* plieronlf to oountlee rlt R a populetion

of not lssa than 27,000and not in0x-a than 17,100, aOOOrding

to thb l~3Bt

etV8ilablO

rrnfted 3tateB cenuua. QnrlrThst ecoordlng to t&u lest;

mderal Cm&o, JasperCiJunty h&d 0 populetScm

or 17,064,

and that no other oowty In the btata of Tesa~s he4 a population that rmmci within the braO&t of 17,000 to 17,100.
*JrdlThat asid Bill wa8 lmmduorb and paemd aolelpr0r the purpoesor Ismroa~fAig the sslarim or the countyCo~aalonerrsOi Jaapercauntr,

and a pliei,

to no othrrr

orrioer or Jaspercounby,

an x ir theresore

~rsgti64tory

0r the affairs

of JaujmrCountby

to ~tJ20t~0xtentr No notide was ig;irbn aa MtplLred~ by tfsa~llon fl, or Rrtr III, a3oantitutlon or Teraa&
"t&h8That rt fib tiss OS lntro4wJt1ua aaQ:pWmga df the Bill, lt~wlro kntiua urd~tmdatrtood thst aaid blll.would ~6% 8ftrrotmiy

Qthor imtntp ln thir Net*, uv¶ wee lntmbaoed and priteact with oh8 p.renami idea that it weutd mmi famp3~ County only.COWty .AttOmiy and roqUe~t# that the Attorney Ooneralof l’exsr

paeo upo::

the. netter, aooerting that they are perfactly wil1lag to abide by the ru.Li~ made by goux~Depertmnt upm thrr r8w in quastlon.
*Theret& give E(I

gour op nlan’on ;t if you wil3.

be kind anaugh to thr abovemattec at fan early date,you ‘will Eraa tly oblige

,”
Artlole23504,Ravlalril Civil Statutea of Tams, raads as fol.J.owsr

“la every County in thle Stata,havinga po&ation of not lea8 than esvantaan thcmmnd (17,OQO)

and not tire than savantaen thouaend, one hundred (17,1.00) aooordiri

to the la&t avellable UaltedJtatasCansue,the ocunpaneatlon 0Sl soh County ComaA.ssloner, 80 long~asthe taxable rslues in 8aSd County ahaLl sro6.d the sum of $ix Vll.lion

right HundredThousuld Dollar6 (66 600 OOCil

fer the next pmosd ba &h&an Hun&ad Dollara years, ahsll par roar, to be paid 

### in .equal



### meathly lnadhe+a, riit~ per oeat of whloh a@ouat ihall ba pelt3 out of 

### (59)

the aaaral Pund of the County,and flttg (50) per aaat out of the aof34 end BrLi&eFund or the Gouaty~

provldi15

that ‘khan

eudh taxable

Value8 for the next pmo66ing yeas 8ha~U. fall bolou ~$4 mai, ths salaryof aooh Ceuntg Cdssioner ahaLl ba a6 provided

in ArtSole 2350 of tha iiLvlse& statutes

or 1925.*

we ore enolaslng

herewith

eopiss 01 oplnirlns

i40ar O-735 and O-699 OD **t&iB** Departmant, which poae uwn qusetlonsaMJar PO t&3 qur6tloa **stated** In your Zetterti Under the facta rrtatad Fn your latter,

and 

### under this authoritlea

~olt;ed fq youi? brief and under the authorlties oitsd la oplnlons Holr. o-735 and Q-699 or this De sent, ~$0~

B~FB reepcrotfi&lLy

atMae that tt is tho opin If*rton of thla Departmmt that your opinion upon tbfa question is oortiot

and thatAStiol.rr

23504,Revise4C;toiL Usatutes

ofBy (Sl@ned) Wm. J. FSMiI& Wm. .J. FPMlng Aaalstant

.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 16, 2014

No. 04-14-00227-CV

BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT,

Appellant

v.

SIVAGE INVESTMENTS, LTD. and Sivage Community Development, Inc,

Appellees

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-04570

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to consolidate appeal numbers 04-14-00227-

CV, 04-14-00228-CV, 04-14-00229-CV, and 04-14-00230-CV. Based on the representations in 

the motion regarding the similarities in the cases, this court has determined that the appeals 

should be consolidated for briefing and argument. 

We therefore grant the motion and order the appeals consolidated for the purpose of 

briefing and argument. The parties shall file all motions, briefs, and other documents as if the 

four appeals were one case, but shall include all four appeal numbers in the style. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 9.3(a). The records for the four appeals shall remain separate. The four appeals will be 

argued together, as a single appeal, and the total time limit for each side at oral argument shall 

equal the ordinary time limit for a single appeal absent a motion requesting different time 

considerations. The court will dispose of all four appeals with the same judgment, opinion, and 

mandate.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EX-10.7(A)



 Exhibit 10.7(a) 

522 Fifth Avenue 
 New York, NY
10036 
  
 



 
 June 1, 2016 
 PGR
Capital LLP 
 Liberty House 
 222 Regent Street 

London W1B STR, 
 UK 

Attention: Casey Grylls 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Grylls: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management
Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2017 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	PGR Master Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	Diversified 2000 Futures Fund L.P. 

  

	 	•	 	MSSB Spectrum Strategic L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036 or fax to 866-428-9026. If you have any questions, I can be
reached at 
 212-296-6808 or contact Jack Yuen at 212-296-1320. 

Very truly yours, 
 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 

 
 



 
 By: 
 Patrick
T. Egan 
 President and Director 
 PGR
CAPITAL LLP 
  
 



 
 By: 
 Print Name: CASEY GRYLLS

 PE/kg            PARTNER
#### STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Artura Winifred HAMILTON, Appellant.

No. 51036.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2.

July 12, 1965.

Norman H. Anderson, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Ben Ely, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.

Gwendolyn M. Wells, Kansas City, for appellant.

FINCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction of murder in the second degree. Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a term of twelve years.

The jury returned its verdict on June 16, 1964. On that same date, on application of counsel for defendant, the court granted thirty days from June 16, 1964, to file motion for a new trial. Thereafter on July 17, 1964, a motion for new trial was filed. It was taken up and overruled on August 24, 1964, and on that same date an appeal was taken to this court.

Rule 27.20(a), V.A.M.R., requires that motions for new trial in criminal cases be filed within ten days after the verdict is returned, with the proviso that the court may extend the time on application for a maximum of thirty additional days. The transcript in this case discloses that on June 16, 1964, the court entered an order granting a total of thirty days from June 16, 1964, in which to file a motion for new trial. That extended the time to and including July 16, 1964. No application for a further extension was made. Then on July 17, 1964, a motion for new trial was filed. We have held repeatedly that compliance with Rule 27.20(a) is mandatory and that a motion for new trial not filed in conformity therewith is a nullity and preserves nothing for review. We are precluded from consideration of matters required to be preserved in a motion for new trial. State v. Franklin, Mo., 379 S.W.2d 526; State v. Parker, Mo., 310 S.W.2d 923, and State v. Kenton, Mo., 298 S.W.2d 433. The motion for new trial herein was not filed in accordance with the Rule.

No brief on behalf of defendant was filed in this court but the transcript discloses that defendant was represented ably throughout the trial and in all after-trial proceedings in the Circuit Court by an attorney of his selection.

Pursuant to Rule 28.02, V.A.M.R., we have reviewed those matters therein enumerated, for which assignments in a motion for new trial are not necessary, and we find no error. The information is sufficient, the verdict is in order, the punishment fixed was within the statutory limits, defendant was accorded allocution and the judgment is in proper form.

The judgment is affirmed.

All of the Judges concur.
#### Jim IRBY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 13, 1955.

S. A. Cary, Burkesville, for appellant.

J.-D. Buckman, Jr.-, Atty. Gen.,'Williám' F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Cumberland Circuit Court convicting appellant of the offense of possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in local option territory, with punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and thirty days in jail. We have examined the record and find no merit in the ground urged for reversal.

Motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: May 12, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: EPA Region 1

SUBJECT: April 23, 2015, Presentation including Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants at Northeast Gas Association’s 2015 Meeting

SUMMARY

On April 23, 2015, Regional Administrator Curt Spalding spoke at the Northeast Gas 

Association’s 2015 Regional Market Trends Forum. The presentation included an overview of 

the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants.

ATTENDEES

Curt Spalding, EPA

John Moskal, EPA

Jim Murphy, EPA

Steven Leahy, Northeast Gas Association

Approximately 200 people attended this conference. Attendance was not taken by EPA

Presentation slides are attached.