alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, Appellant, v. Roy HOLBROOK and Lorainne Holbrook, wife, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 18, 1965.

Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., William A. Lamkin, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Frankfort, Edmond H. Tackett, Dept, of Highways, Prestonsburg, for appellant.

Cordell H. Martin, Hindman, Rudy Yes-sin, Edward L. Fossett, Frankfort, for appellees.

CLAY, Commissioner.

In this highway condemnation case the landowners were awarded $7,000 compensation for the taking of 3.11 acres from the hack end of approximately 11 acres of overflow bottom land fronting on Kentucky Highway 114 and sloping back to Burning Fork Creek. The taking also severed .8 of an acre. Appellant questions the competency of appellees’ evidence and contends the verdict is obviously excessive.

Three witnesses testified for appellees. One was an owner of the land, another was a neighboring farmer and the third was a real estate broker and auctioneer. They testified that the difference in value before and after the taking was approximately $10,000, based on an estimated before value of $19,000.

The testimony of the landowner lacked probative value from many standpoints, one of which was that he valued his tract at $1,000 an acre (including valuable improvements) and then said the taking of a little over three acres caused damage about triple the value of the land in the first place. Another witness considered speculative factors and based his opinion of damage upon what he would take for the loss of acreage if it were his farm.' The only witness who appeared well qualified as an expert showed lack of adequate knowledge of the property involved and included as a factor a certain condition not shown to be related to the taking.

To begin with, the landowners’ valuation evidence was unsatisfactory in many respects and demonstrated a tendency grossly to inflate the before value and grossly minimize the after value without sound reasons therefor. The most glaringly incom *898prehensible thing about the testimony of ap-pellees’ witnesses is that they estimated the loss of the least valuable one-third of the tract caused the landowners damage in a sum greater than one-half the value of the whole tract. While the jury would not go this far (thereby evincing their opinion that the evidence of the landowners’ witnesses was not fully credible), this verdict which allows appellees more than $2,000 an acre for bottom land subject to periodic overflow is at first and last blush excessive. See Commonweatlh, Department of Highways v. George, Ky., 387 S.W.2d 580.

The judgment is reversed for a new trial.
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                    JOINDER TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT

     This Joinder Agreement (this "JOINDER AGREEMENT") is made as of the date
written below by the undersigned (the "JOINING PARTY") in accordance with
Section 3.16 of the Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 27, 2004
(the "REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT") (as the same shall be amended,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), among Solo Cup Investment
Corporation and the parties set forth on the signature pages thereto and any
other signatories added thereafter (including by the execution of a similar
joinder agreement). Capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this Joinder
Agreement shall have the meaning ascribed to those terms in the Registration
Rights Agreement.

     The Joining Party hereby acknowledges, agrees and confirms that, by its
execution of this Joinder Agreement, the Joining Party shall become a party to
the Registration Rights Agreement as of the date hereof and shall have all of
the rights and obligations of a Management Investor thereunder as if it had
executed the Registration Rights Agreement directly as a Management Investor.
The Joining Party hereby agrees to be bound as a Management Investor by all of
the terms, provisions and conditions contained in the Registration Rights
Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Joinder Agreement as
of the date written below.

     Date: __________, 2004

                                     JOINING PARTY:

                                     -------------------------------------------

                                     By:
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                     Name:
                                     Title:

Acknowledged and Accepted by:

SOLO CUP INVESTMENT CORPORATION


By:
   ----------------------------------
Name:
Title:
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors of

Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-58292, 33-65477, 333-35927, 333-84552 and 333-88727) on Form S-3 and registration statements (Nos. 2-91731, 33-2623, 33-2624, 33-34098, 33-37148, 33-46970,33-70584, 33-63705, 333-16485, 333-16487, 333-29513, 333-35917, 333-46443, 333-55060, 333-67356, 333-88411, 333-122660, 333-122661, 333-122662, 333-137878 and 333-137879) on Form S-8 of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. of our reports datedAugust 13, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. as of June 2, 2007 and June 3, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity andcomprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 2, 2007, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2007 and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of June 2, 2007, which reports appear in the June 2, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements refers to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc.’s adoption of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),Share-Based Payment. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

August 13, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ASKIA MUHAMMAD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 149 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of March, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice McCaffery did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
### Dtrr-OST ..

### 2DOO - G:t

## ":f15

Randall Watanuki 56-108 Damien Rd. 

### 1**J~N** 

### 2I A 

### q:**~**

### 5 Kalaupapa Settlement, Hawai'i 96742-0121
January 6, 2011

Dear Mr.DeVany, Thank you for considering Kalaupapa as a candidate for an EAS subsidy. Currently, the only land-based link we have with the rest ofthe island of Moloka'i is by a steep 3 mile mule trail which winds its way up sea cliffs which are listed in the Guiness Book ofWorld Records as the highest sea cliffs on the planet. The trail can be treacherous as evidenced by a recent landslide which washed out a section ofthe bridge between turns 2 and 3. The majority ofthe residents here are physically unable to hike the trail and are thankful foryour consideration in granting afuture carrier an EAS subsidy to serve Kalaupapa.

Sincerely,
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 36779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14678]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

TIME AND PLACE: Thursday, June 27, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The meeting will 
be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 321, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, 
DC 20571.

OPEN AGENDA ITEMS: Item No. 1: Ex-Im Bank's Environmental Procedures 
and Guidelines.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public observation 
for Item No. 1 only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Members of the public who wish to 
attend the meeting should call Joyce Stone, Office of the Secretary, 
811 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20571 (202) 565-3336 by close of 
business Tuesday, June 25, 2013.

Cristopolis A. Dieguez,
Program Specialist, Office of the General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-14678 Filed 6-17-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-4048) pertaining to the 1992, 1995 and 1996 Stock Option
Plans and Individual Officer and Director Stock Option Agreements and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-71017) pertaining to the 1998 Stock
Option Plan, 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, 1998 Employment
Incentive Option Plan, and the 1996 Stock Option Plan B of Medical Resources,
Inc. of our report dated March 15, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Medical Resources, Inc. for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the
year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Hackensack, New Jersey
 
April 21, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,198
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,922
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               111,138
<PP&E>                                          97,428
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,085
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 338,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          169,312
<BONDS>                                         38,078
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     18,242
<COMMON>                                           219
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   338,956
<SALES>                                        202,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,386
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,685
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                20,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,167
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (31,239)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,938)
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,177)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.62)
        

</TABLE>
#### Stella Mae BRADLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27572.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 27, 1955.

*162No attorney on appeal for appellant.

■ Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

.The offense is the possession' of whiskey upon which *iio*tax had been paid; the punishment; a fine of $100.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment js affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
Chief Executive and Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18U.S.C.,SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002),  I, the  undersigned  Chief  Executive and
Financial Officer of Zkid Network Company, (the "Company"), hereby certify that,
to the best of my knowledge,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company
for the period  ended  March 31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the financial  condition  and results of operation of the Company.  A
signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 has been
provided  to the  registrant  and will be retained  by it and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated:  May 19, 2004
                                                       /s/ Jon A. Darmstadter
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Jon A. Darmstadter
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      Chief Financial Officer









                                       11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,649
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                        80
<INVENTORY>                                      2,315
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,942
<PP&E>                                           2,401
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,987
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           17,265
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                     (15,789)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,343
<SALES>                                          3,533
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,533
<CGS>                                            1,876
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,150)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.42)


</TABLE>
#### Aubrey GIST, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27549.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 27, 1955.

*164No attorney ón appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

' ' per cürÍaiíí. .

The unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area is the offense,; the punishment, a fine of $100. ' , " ‘ "

. The- record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is present for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 24, 2017

p0517t 

# Order

Clerk May 24, 2017

154376

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154376

COA: 323273

Berrien CC: 2013

- 004380

- FH

DAVID DASHON SHAW,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

W ILDER , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Exhibit 32.2

      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
                to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of OnScreen Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB of the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I hereby certify
solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
     or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

OnScreen Technologies, Inc.

By: /s/ Mark R. Chandler
    -------------------------------------
           Mark R. Chandler
       Chief Financial Officer

Dated this 14th day of August 2006
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

# **Co-Registrant(Commission File Number 000-30761):**

# ** **

**UbiquiTelInc.**

**OneWest Elm Street**

**Suite400**

**Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428**

 

**Co-Registrant (Commission File Number333-39950):**

 

**UbiquiTel Operating Company**

**One West Elm Street**

**Suite 400**

**Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428**

 

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED**

## **PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTelOperating Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, James J. Volk, Chief Financial Officer of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTelOperating Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company.

 
|     | UBIQUITEL INC.              |
|----------|-----------------------------|
|     |                        |
|     |                        |
| * * | */s/ James J. Volk*         | * * |
|     | James J. Volk               |
|     | Chief Financial Officer     |
|     |                        |
|     |                        |
|     | UBIQUITEL OPERATING COMPANY |
|     |                        |
|     |                        |
| * * | */s/ James J. Volk*         | * * |
|     | James J. Volk               |
|     | Chief Financial Officer     |
|     |                        |
|     |                        |
|     | August 9, 2005              |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1560 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1560

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 8, 2011

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and Coushatta Indian 
  Tribes of Texas Restoration Act to allow the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo 
  Tribe to determine blood quantum requirement for membership in that 
                                 tribe.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BLOOD QUANTUM REQUIREMENT DETERMINED BY TRIBE.

    Section 108(a)(2) of the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama and 
Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act (25 U.S.C. 1300g-
7(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) any person of Tigua Ysleta del Sur Pueblo Indian 
        blood enrolled by the tribe.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 7, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Table of Contents




Exhibit 10.2



Certification of
Chief Financial Officer
                                    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
                    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





    
In
connection with the Annual Report of Banco Bradesco S.A (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for
the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Milton Almicar Silva Vargas, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 




	    (1)  	 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934;           and








	    (2)  	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial           condition and results of operations of the Company.






	 	/s/ Milton Almicar Silva Vargas

	 	Milton Almicar Silva Vargas
Chief Financial Officer 
Dated: June 30, 2004






A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting  the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Banco Bradesco S.A. and will be retained by Banco Bradesco S.A. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.