**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ) (Renewal)**
**1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the Information Collection**  NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ) (Renewal), EPA I CR Number 1951 .5 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0511

. **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Paper and Other Web Coatings ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart JJJJ ) were proposed on September 13, 2000, (65 FR 55331), and promulgated on December 4, 2002, (67 FR 72341). These regulations appl y to both existing and new paper and to other web coating facili ties, including web coating lines engaged in the coating of metal webs used in flexible packaging, and web coating lines engaged in the coating of fabric substrates for use in pressure sensitive tape and abrasive materials. New facilities include those th at commenced construction or reconstruction on or before December 4, 2002. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart JJJJ. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or an y period during which the monitoring s ys tem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all affected facilities s ubject to NESHAP. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority

. In the event that there is no such delegated authority , the reports are sent directl y to the U

. S

. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facilities at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an aver age of 2 33 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the standard, plus 6 additional respondents per year will become subject to the standard. The active (previous) IC R had the following Terms of Clearance (TOC):2

When this I CR is renewed, EPA should review the respondent burden, universe, response number, labor rates, and capital costs and ensure these estimates have been updated.
EPA has addressed each item of concern in the TOC . The labor rates, number of respondents, capital costs, and respondent burd en have been thoroughly checked, and all estimates have been updated. All of the paper and other web coating facilities in the United States are owned and operated b y the paper and other web coating industry (the “Affected Public”). None of the faciliti es in the United States are owned b y state, local, tribal or the Federal government. They are privatel y- owned , for

- profit businesses. The burden to the “Affected Public” is listed below in Table1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ ) (Renewal). The Federal government burden associated with the review of reports submitted by the respondent is shown below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ ) (Renewal).
**2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintai n such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, duri ng such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certification s in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment, particulate emissions from paper and other web coating3

facilities cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonabl y be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP standards were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR part 63, subpart JJJJ. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and repo rting requirements in the standard ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings. Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance test a re cord of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated, leaks are being detected and repaired, and the standard are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determi nations.
**3. Non**
**- duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria**  The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart JJJJ. **3(a) Non**
**- duplication**  If the subject standards have not been delegated, the informati on is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required b y the Federal standards. Therefore, no duplication exists. **3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB** An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published4

in the Federal Register (76 FR 26900) on May 9, 2011. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations**
T he Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have been considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by the EPA Office of Compliance. OTIS is the EPA database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate f or the industry

is based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed. In developing this I CR, we contacted : 1) the American Forest and Paper Association (AF&PA) , at (202) 463

- 2700 ; and 2) the National Paper Trade Association (NPTA ) Alliance , at ( 800) 355

- 6782 . In this case, no comments were received.
It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection** Less frequent information collection would d ecrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitatio ns are met. If the information required b y these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting violations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines** These reportin g or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five ye ar records retention requirement is consistent the Part 70 permit program and the five ye ar statute of limitations on which the permit program is base d. The retention of records for five ye ars allows EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, an y pattern of non

- compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violati ons extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or5

nonexistence of essential records. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidential ity is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 4 3 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979). **3(g) Sensitive Questions** The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested 4(a)**  **Respondents/SIC Codes** The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are paper and other web coating facilities . The U

. . Standard Industrial Classification (SI C ) codes for the respondents affected b y the standard and the corresponding N orth American Industry Classification System (NAICS ) codes, are listed below for the paper and other web coating industry

.

**Standard (40 CFR, part 63, subpart JJJJ) SIC**  **Codes NAICS** 

**Codes** Corrugated and Solid Fiber Box Manufacturing 2653 322211 Folding Paperboard Box Manufacturing 2657 322212 Coated and Laminated Packaging Paper and Plastics Film Manufacturing 2671 322221 Coated and Laminated Paper Manufacturing 2672 322222 Plastics, Foil, and Coated Paper Bag Manufacturing 2673 322223 Uncoated Paper and Multiwall Bag Manufacturing 2674 322224 Surface

- Coated Paperboard Manufacturing 2675 322226 All Other Converted Paper Product Manufacturing 2675, 2679 322299 Coated and Laminated Paper Manufacturing 2679 322222 Commercial Gravure Printing 2754 323111 Manifold Business Form Printing 2761 323116 Un

- laminated Plastics Film and Sheet (except packaging) Manufacturing 3081 3261136 **Standard (40 CFR, part 63, subpart JJJJ) SIC**  **Codes NAICS** 

**Codes** Laminated Plastics Plates, Sheet (except packaging), and Shape Manufacturing 3083 326130 Abrasive Products Manufacturing 3291 327910 Laminated Aluminum Foil Manufacturing for Flexible Packaging Uses 3497 322225 **4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items**  In this ICR, all the data that is recorded or reported is required b y the NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR P art 63, S ubpart JJJJ). A source must make the following reports: **Notifications/ Reports** Initial notification 63.09(b), 63.3400(b) Notification of performance test 63.07, 63.09(e), 63.3400(d) Notification of compliance status 63.09(h), 63.3400(e) Notification of performance tests results 63.13(f) Performance test report 63.3400(e) Startup, shutdown, and malfunctions report 63.10(d)(5), 63.3400(g) Semiannual compliance report 63.3400(c)(3) A source must keep the following records: **Recordkeeping** Record of startup, shutdowns, and malfunctions 63.10(b)(2), 63.3410(a) Records are required to be retained for five years 63.10(b)(1) Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not7

widely used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respondents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Perform initial performance test, Reference Methods 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2C, 2D, 2F, 2G, 3, 3A, 3B, 4, 24, 25, 25A, test and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Adjust the existing way s to comply with an y previously applicable instructions and requirements. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwis e disclose the information. Currently , sources are using monitoring equipment that provides parameter data in an automated way

(e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem). Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantl y reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the fol lowing activities in connection with the acquisition, analy sis, storage, and distribution of the required information.
**Agency Activities** Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions8 **Agency Activities** reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility

records. Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to compl y with the emission standard. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the c ollection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses the OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional off ices and EPA headquarters. The EPA and its delegated a uthorities can edit, store, retrieve and anal yz e the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** A majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process op erations and the ty pes of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be reduced. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown below in Table1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ ) (Renewal).9

**6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection** Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden unde r the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where ver appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden** The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 1 1, 861 (Total Labor Hours from Table 1). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency

knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously approved ICR, and an y comments receive d. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $121.42 ($57.82 + 110%) Technical $99.14 ($47.21 + 110%) Clerical $49.81 ($23.72 + 110%)
These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2011, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit p ackages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs** The ty pe of industry

costs associated with the information collection activities in the subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are a on e - time cost when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the monitor and other costs such as photocopying and postage.10

**(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenan ce (O&M) Costs**  (A) Continuous Monitoring Device (B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent (C)

Number of New Respondents (D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost, (B X C) (E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent (F)

Number of Respondents with O&M (G)

Total O&M, (E X F)

Parametric mo nitoring (contractor) $10,000 5 $50,000 $25 207 $ 5 , 175

Continuous emission mo nitoring system (CEMS) $183,500 1 $183,500 $26,700 2 6 $6 94 , 2 00

Total cost $233,500 $6 99 , 375 The total capital/startup costs for this I CR are $233,500. This is the total of column D in the above table. The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this I CR are $6 99 , 375 . This is the total of column G. The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of the IC R is estimated to be $ 932 , 875

. **6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost** The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the repo rted information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $3 6 1, 370

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $62.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $38.92 + 60%) Technical $46.21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 + 60%) Clerical $25.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 + 60%) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2011 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay . The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees. Details upon wh ich this11

estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ ) (Renewal). **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our res earch for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 22 7 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that an additional 6 respondents per ye ar will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown in the table below is 2 33 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR.
**Number of Respondents**

Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 6 221 0 0 22 7
2 6 22 7 0 0 2 33
3 6 2 33 0 0 23 9 Average 6 22 7 0 0 2 33 1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities.

. Column D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 2 33

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:12 **Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D

Initial Notification 6 1 0 6 Notification of performance test 6 1 0 6 Notification of compliance status 6 1 0 6 Performance test reports 6 1 0 6 SSM reports 207 0.2 0 41.4 Semiannual report 2 33 2 0 466 Total 531.4 The number of Total Annual Responses is 5 31 (rounded). The total annual labor costs are $ 1, 136 , 498 . Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ ) (Renewal). **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables**  The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown below in Tables 1 and 2, respectively , and summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally** The total annual labor hours are 11, 861 at a cost of $1,136,498 . Details regarding these estimates may

be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ ) (Renewal). Furthermore, the annual public rep orting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 22 hours per response. The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $ 932 , 875 . The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii) , Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.13 **(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 8 , 151 labor hours at a cost of $3 6 1, 370 . See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

- NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ ) (Renewal). **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is an increase in labor hours and costs for both the respondents and the Agency from the most recently

approv ed ICR. The increase in burden cost is due to adjustments in labor rates. This ICR uses updated labor rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to calculate burden costs. The increase in labor hours is due to an increase in the number of respondents sub ject to the standard from the previous I CR. The growth in respondent universe also results in an increase in the total O&M costs to the respondents. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of info rmation is estimated to average 22 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time ne eded to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the e xisting way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise dis close the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has establis hed a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

–HQ

–OECA

–2011

–0258. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically . When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this docume nt. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Readi ng Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal14

holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the D ocket C enter is (202) 566

- 17 52 . Also, you can send comments to th e Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

–HQ

–OECA

–2011

– 0258 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0511 in any correspondence. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.15

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ)**  **(Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person hours**  **per year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

1. Reporting requirements A. Read instructions c 4 1 4.00 6 24.00 1.20 2.40 $2,644.61 B. Gather information c 4 4 16.00 6 96.00 4.80 9.60 $10,578.43 C. Write reports c i. Initial notification 2 1 2.00 6 12.00 0.60 1.20 $1,322.30 ii. Notification of performance test 2 1 2.00 6 12.00 0.60 1.20 $1,322.30 iii. Notification of compliance status 2 1 2.00 6 12.00 0.60 1.20 $1,322.30 iv. Performance test reports 2 1 2.00 6 12.00 0.60 1.20 $1,322.30 v. SSM reports d 2 0.2 0.40 207 82.80 4.14 8.28 $9,123.90 vi. Semiannual summary report 4 2 8.00 233 1,864.00 93.20 186.40 $205,397.89 **Subtotal for Reporting Requirements** 2,432 $233,034.04 2. Recordkeeping requirements A. Read instructions c 4 1 4.00 6 24.00 1.20 2.40 $2,644.61 B. Plan activities c 15 1 15.00 6 90.00 4.50 9.00 $9,917.28 C. Implement activities for compliance coating use e 5 12 60.00 21 1,260.00 63.00 126.00 $138,841.92 D. Implement activities for control devices and process equipment c16

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person hours**  **per year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

i. Design analysis 12 1 12.00 6 72.00 3.60 7.20 $7,933.82 ii. Performance test oversight 20 1 20.00 6 120.00 6.00 12.00 $13,223.04 E. Develop record system i. Develop startup, shutdow n, malfunction 20 1 15 6 24 1.2 2.4 $2,644.61

Plan c ii. Develop plan for material used 10 1 10.00 21 210.00 10.50 21.00 $23,140.32 iii. Control equipment and maintenance plan c 10 1 10.00 6 60.00 3.00 6.00 $6,611.52 F. Time to enter information i. Compliance calculation 2 12 24.00 21 504.00 25.20 50.40 $55,536.77 ii. Control equipment testing 1 1 1.00 207 207.00 10.35 20.70 $22,809.74 G. Time to train personnel i. Acquisition and installation
c 15 1 15.00 6 90.00 4.50 9.00 $9,917.28 ii. Equipment inspection and mo nitoring 10 1 10.00 207 2,070.00 103.50 207.00 $228,097.44 iii. Use of technology and systems f 10 1 10.00 207 2,070.00 103.50 207.00 $228,097.44 H. Store, file and maintain records g 0.25 12 3.00 233 699.00 34.95 69.90 $77,024.21 I. Retrieve records/reports g 0.25 12 3.00 233 699.00 34.95 69.90 $77,024.21

**Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements** 9,429 $903,464.2117

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year**  **(C=AxB) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person hours**  **per year (Ex0.1)**  **(H)**

**Cost, $ b** 

**TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (rounded)** 11,861 $1,136,498

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to this rule will be 2 33 . There will be eighteen additional new sources that will become subject to the rule over the three

- year period of the ICR (i.e., six per year). b This ICR uses th e following labor rates: $121.42 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $ 99.14 per hour for Technical labor, and $ 49.81 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bure au of Labor Statistics, Septem ber 2011, “T able 2: Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are from column 1: “Total Compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 p ercent to account for the benefit packages available to thos e em ployed by

private industry. c We have assumed that this is a one

- time activity for each new facility. d Startup, shutdown, malfunction (SSM) reports are to be submitted twice a year with the required semiannual report. How ever, as estimated 20 perc ent of the respondents will submit an additional report for a non

- conforming SSM. e We have assumed that it would take 21 respondents to record activities for compliance coating use. f We have assumed that 233 respondents will be involved in the storage, filing, maintenance and retrieval of records and reports. g We have assumed that 2 33 respondents will be involved in the storage, filing, maintenance and retrieval of records and reports twelve times per year.18

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cos t** 

**– NESHAP for Paper and Other Web Coating**  **(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart JJJJ) (Renewal)** 

**Burden item (A) Person**  **hours per occurrence**  **(B) No. of**

**occurrences per**  **respondent per year**  **(C) Person**

**hours per respondent**  **per year (C=AxB)**  **(D)**

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)**  **Technical**

**person -**  **hours per year**  **(E=CxD) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G) Clerical** 

**person hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H) Cost, $**  **b**

1. Review initial notification c 8 1 8.00 6 48.00 0.30 4.80 $2,356.81 2. Review notification of compliance status 10 1 10.00 6 60.00 0.30 6.00 $2,941.34 3. Review SSM reports d 4 0.25 1.00 207 207.00 10.35 20.70 $10,727.67 4. Review semiannual summary reports e 15 2 30.00 233 6,990.00 11.65 699.00 $341,215.34 5. Review notification of performance test c 4 1 4.00 6 24.00 0.30 2.40 $1,187.75 6. Review test results c, f 10 1 10.00 6 60.00 0.30 6.00 $2,941.34

**TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST (rounded)** 8,151 $361,370

**Assu mptions:**  a We have assumed that the average number of respondents that will be subject to this rule will be 2 33 . There will be eighteen additional new sources that will become subject to the rule over the three

- year period of the ICR (i.e., six per year). b This cost is based on the following labor rates w hich incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: $62.27 for Managerial (GS

- 13, Step 5, $38.92 x 1.6), $46.21 for Technical (GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 x 1.6), and $2 5.01 Clerical (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 x 1.6). These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2011 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay. c We have assumed that this is a one

- time activity for each new facility. d Startup, shutdown, malfunction (SSM) reports are to be submitted twice a year with the required semiannual report. However, as estimated 20 percent of the respondents will submit an additional report for a non

- conforming SSM.
e It is assumed that each respondents will revie w summary reports twice per year. f We have assumed that it will take each respondents ten hours to review test results.