alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# prepared for:

**CENRAP/CENSARA**

**prepared by:**

**Gregory Stella**

**Jim W**  **ilkinson**

**T.W. Tesche**

**Alpine Geophysics, LLC**  

# Appendix G:

**CENRAP**

**Class I Ar**  **ea**

**Cost Effectiveness Curves** 

### Breton Island

**SO4/EC/OC/CM A OI-1** 

$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000 $4,500

0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000**M i** **l l** **i o** **n s** 

**An nual Emission Reduction (Tons)** **C o** **n t** **r o** **l C** **o s** **t (** **2 0** **0 5** **$ )**  Top Residual Categories Only

All Categories

### Boundary **Waters-Voy ageurs** 

**SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS A OI-1** 

$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000**M i** **l l** **i o** **n s** 

**An nual Emission Reduction (Tons)** **C o** **n t** **r o** **l C** **o s** **t (** **2 0** **0 5** **$ )**  Top Residual Categories Only

All Categories

### Salt Creek-Guadalupe Mountain-Big Bend

**SO4/EC/OC/CM/FS A OI-1** 

$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000

0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000**M i** **l l** **i o** **n s** 

**An nual Emission Reduction (Tons)** **C o** **n t** **r o** **l C** **o s** **t (** **2 0** **0 5** **$ )**  Top Residual Categories Only

All Categories

### Wichita Mountain

**SO4/EC/OC A OI-1** 

$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000

0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000**M i** **l l** **i o** **n s** 

**An nual Emission Reduction (Tons)** **C o** **n t** **r o** **l C** **o s** **t (** **2 0** **0 5** **$ )**  Top Residual Categories Only

All Categories
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 11

- 00314

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

, Appellant

v.

Shelley TIFFEE

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No

. 2

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CVK001955C3

Honorable Jesus Garza , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 3, 2011

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a mot ion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant. See id.

42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
#### Norman Lee MORRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27619.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1955.

Thomas L. • Blanton, Albany, for ; 'appellant. .

Leon Douglas, State’s-Atty:,-'Austin, for the State. : ■

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated as a second offender, as denounced by Article 802b, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, a fine of $100.

Appellant challenged the validity of the judgment in the prior conviction, alleged in order to make the primary offense a felony, in the following ways:

> 1. By motion to quash the indictment.

> 2. By objection to the introduction of the prior judgment, and

> 3. By a requested charge and obj ec-tions to the court’s charge.

Among other reasons assigned was the failure of, the complaint and information to charge that the offense occurred upon a public highway. The complaint and information were introduced in evidence, and they fail to contain this essential averment. Unless a charge of driving while intoxicated contains -the recitation that the act was committed upon a public highway, it fails to charge an pífense and will not support a valid judgment. Ward v. State, 102 Tex.Cr.R. 204, 277 S.W. 672, and Johnson v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 432, 72 S.W.2d 256. A conviction which depends upon the use of such a judgment to make the primary offense a felony cannot on appeal be permitted to stand.

We ca'nnot sustain this conviction as a first offender because the primary offense was charged to have been committed on December 9, 1953, which was subsequent to the amendment of Article 802, which made a jail term mandatory, and no con.finement in jail was .assessed as part of the punishment in this case.

*256Upon another trial, the question of the prosecutor’s argument will not arise.

Because this indictment, will support a misdemeanor conviction as a first offender, the cause is not ordered dismissed, but the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

It is so ordered.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 11315]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-03061]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-576-577 and 731-TA-1362-1367 (Review)]


Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing From China, Germany, India, Italy, 
South Korea, and Switzerland

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty orders on certain 
cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel (``cold-drawn 
mechanical tubing'') from China and India and the antidumping duty 
orders on cold-drawn mechanical tubing from China, Germany, India, 
Italy, South Korea, and Switzerland would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on January 3, 2023 (88 FR 
114) and determined on April 10, 2023 that it would conduct a full 
review (88 FR 24442, April 20, 2023). Notice of the scheduling of the 
Commission's reviews and of a public hearing to be held in connection 
therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of 
the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and 
by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on July 13, 2023 (88 
FR 44841). The Commission conducted its hearing on November 28, 2023. 
All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to 
participate.
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on February 9, 2024. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5487 (February 2024), 
entitled Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing from China, Germany, India, 
Italy, South Korea, and Switzerland: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-576-577 
and 731-TA-1362-1367 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 9, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-03061 Filed 2-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: May

12, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: EPA Region 1 SUBJECT: April 23, 2015 , Presentation including Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants at Northeast Gas Association’s 2015 Meeting
**SUMMARY** On April 23, 2015, Regional Administrator Curt Spalding spoke at the Northeast Gas Association’s 2015 Regional Market Trends Forum. The presentation included an overview of the proposed Clea n Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

. **ATTENDEES** Curt Spalding , EPA John Moskal , EPA Jim Murphy , EPA Steven Leah y, Northeast Gas Association Approximately 200 people attended this conference. Attendance was not taken by EPA Presentation slides are attached.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7052

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL AUGUSTUS STEWART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-95-63, CA-97-749-R)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Augustus Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Burnham, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Augustus Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Stewart, No.

CR-95-63; CA-97-749-R (W.D. Va. May 5, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II

Calendar No. 311

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 655

[Report No. 104–209]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel MARANTHA.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 30 (legislative day, MARCH 27), 1995

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

JANUARY 26, 1996

Reported by Mr. PRESSLER without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for

the vessel MARANTHA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer-
2

S 655 RS

1 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica2 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

3 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

4 with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the

5 coastwise trade for the vessel MARANTHA (United

6 States official number 638787).

Calendar No. 311

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 655

[Report No. 104–209]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

coastwise trade for the vessel MARANTHA.propriate endorsement for employment in theissue a certificate of documentation with the apJANUARY 26, 1996

Reported without amendment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issuedby the DepartmentofTransportation onthe 11th day ofJune, 2013 Inthematterofthecancellationofthe AirTaxi authority issuedto Order 2013-6-8 Served: June 1L 2013

DocketDOT-OST-2012-0022 VIH COUGARHELICOPTERS, INC. pursuantto the provisions of14 CFR298.24 FINAL ORDER SUMMARY On March 12, 2012, the Department issued Show Cause Order 2012-3-7, tentatively finding that VIH Cougar Helicopters, Inc. ("VIH Cougar''), an operating air taxi, is not a U.S. citizen as defined in 49 U.S.C. §40102(a)(l5) (the "Statute") and consequently, proposingto cancel its air taxi exemption authority pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109(f) and 14 C.F.R. Part 298. As noted in that order, the Department based its tentative findings on the totality of the circumstances, including the operational and managerial interrelationships between VIH Cougar and Mr. Kenneth Norie, a Canadiancitizen andthe beneficial minority owner ofVIH Cougar, and/or the entities in which he has a majority and/or controlling interest (hereinafter collectively referredto as "VIH Group"). 1 VIH Cougar, although objecting to our tentative findings, subsequently initiated a change in ownership and management in response to these findings. We have thoroughly reviewed the objectionsVIH Cougarprovided to our Show Cause Order, as well as the additional evidentiary material VIH Cougarprovided describingthe relationship between it, its new owner, and its new management on the one hand, and Mr. Norie and VIH Group on the other. Our review ofthe additional evidentiary material VIH Cougar provided reveals that it has not sufficiently addressed or resolved the issues identified in the Department's tentative findings. The undisputed facts show that VIH Cougar continues to be dependent on Mr. Norie, a Canadian citizen, and VIH Group, entities in which he has a majority or controlling interest, for nearly all

VlH Group refers to the entities in which Mr. Norie has a majority and/or controlling interest, including VIH Aviation Group, Ltd.; VIH Helicopters USA, Inc.; CougarAviation, Ltd.; CougarHelicopters, Inc.; VIH Helicopters Ltd.; VIH Aerospace, Inc.; GAO FBO Services, LLC; and Kenlor Investments, Ltd. We note that until recently, these entities were wholly owned by Mr. Norie.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Armstrong Holdings and Subsidiaries Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements as
of and for September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001109304
<NAME> ARMSTRONG HOLDINGS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              34
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      527
<ALLOWANCES>                                        47
<INVENTORY>                                        430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,083
<PP&E>                                           2,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              799
<BONDS>                                          1,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           219
<OTHER-SE>                                         517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,032
<SALES>                                          2,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,444
<CGS>                                            1,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    11
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  80
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (4)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (3)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     116
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       113
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.80


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 581 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 581

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act to 
 repeal those provisions of Federal law that require employees to pay 
    union dues or fees as a condition of employment, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 21 (legislative day, March 16), 1995

 Mr. Faircloth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act to 
 repeal those provisions of Federal law that require employees to pay 
    union dues or fees as a condition of employment, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Right to Work Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.

    (a) Rights of Employees.--Section 7 of the National Labor Relations 
Act (29 U.S.C. 157) is amended by striking ``except to'' and all that 
follows through ``authorized in section 8(a)(3)''.
    (b) Unfair Labor Practices.--Section 8 of the National Labor 
Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ``: Provided That'' 
        and all that follows through ``retaining membership'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``or to 
                discriminate'' and all that follows through ``retaining 
                membership''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ``covered by an 
                agreement authorized under subsection (a)(3)'';
            (3) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (2); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as 
                paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT.

    Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152) is amended by 
striking paragraph Eleventh.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Leadville Mining and Milling Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gifford A. Dieterle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Gifford A. Dieterle
                                        -----------------------
                                        Gifford A. Dieterle
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        October 29, 2002


                                       1
#### J. T. PITCOCK, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30708.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1959.

See also 322 S.W.2d 537.

No attorney of record on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White, Samuel H. Robertson, Jr., and Lee P. Ward, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is passing as true a forged instrument; the punishment, five years.

The appeal is from a conviction upon a plea of guilty before the court.

The indictment alleged the passing of a forged draft for $59.52 drawn on Houston *867National Bank, signed Leon Morrison, 1326 Gray, payable to Battlesteins. The draft was alleged to have been passed to Delbert Washington.

Art. 12, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., provides in part “in no event shall a person charged be convicted upon his plea of guilty without sufficient evidence to support the same.”

Being advised as to the necessity of evidence being heard in each case, appellant and his counsel agreed with counsel for the State that the examining trial testimony and sworn affidavits of witnesses be introduced rather than having the witnesses appear before the court and testify.

We have held that such affidavits were of probative value when introduced by agreement of the defendant. Ex parte Clark, Tex.Cr.App., 299 S.W.2d 128.

The examining trial testimony of S. M. Hammond, Assistant Credit Manager at Battlesteins, was read to the court, in which he said that Delbert Washington (who did not testify) “turned the merchandise over to the defendant and received that check in amount of $59.52 for it.”

It is apparent that Mr. Hammond’s recital as to what occurred between the deliveryman and appellant or his confederates at 1326 Gray was information he had received, and not knowledge he had acquired on the scene. He was not present and his testimony was hearsay.

It was this character of hearsay evidence which we pointed out in Ex parte Clark, Tex.Cr.App., 299 S.W.2d 128, 130, is without probative value, though admitted without objection, because it implies the possession of information rather than knowledge, and derives its value from the veracity of'the informer, not alone upon the credit to be given the witness.

In the absence of testimony of probative value that the draft was passed to Delbert Washington, as alleged in the indictment, the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Exhibit 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter J. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of Parlex Corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

      (a)   the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period
            ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements
            of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
            1934; and

      (b)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

Dated: September 28, 2005

/s/ Peter J. Murphy
-----------------------------
Peter J. Murphy
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>  67
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BayHill Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Bench, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

/s/ ROBERTK. BENCHRobert K. Bench, Principal Executive Officer



September 10, 2008





























---