alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            2478
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2485
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               97
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        2388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   162
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (116)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (116)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (116)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.83)
        

</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1490 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 34 ) IV-C- 7 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/4/200811:51:46

AM Sheet 34 of 273P. 2 [Kennet h Meardo n - Commen t Letter s o n RF P Propose d Rul e 

### A-94-5 2 IV-C- 7 From : To : Start : Due : Subject: Decembe r3 , Dea rMr . Kennet h Meardo n

Spoerl , Joh n 12/3/0 1 12/3/0 1 Commen t Letter s o n RF P Propose d Rul e 2001 Spoerl : A s w e discusse d thi s morning , Kohle rsubmitte d a publi ccommen t lette rfro m Mr . Do n Goa d t o Mr . Keit h Barnett , USEPA , o n Septembe r20 , 2001 o n th e propose d MAC Tstandar d fo rreinforce d plasti c composite s production . Th e comment s i n thi s lette rar e associate d wit h Kohler' s Huntsville , AL , facility . I n addition , commen t letter s associate d wit h Kohler' s Brownwood , TX , an d Spartanburg , SC , facilite s wer e submitte d o n Septembe r25 , 2001 . I n al l thre e letters , Kohle rnote s tha t th e lette rcontain s informatio n considere d proprietaryb yKohle ran d request s tha t EP Ahandl e th e informatio n accordingl yan d exclud e thi s informatio n fro m th e publi cdocket . Unfortunately , non e ofth e letter s identifyth e specifi cinformatio n considere d b yKohle ra s confidential . Th e purpos e o f thi s emai l i s t o reques t tha t Kohle ridentifyth e specifi cinformatio n i n eac h o f th e thre e letter s tha t Kohle rconsider s t o b e confidentia l s o tha t w e mayb e abl e t o pu t a non-confidentia l versio n o f eac h lette ri n th e publi cdocket . Thi s ma yb e don e b

ysubmittin g a non-confidentia l versio n o f eac h lette r o rb ymarking-u p th e origina l letter s i n suc h a manne rtha t w e ca n creat e a non-confidentia l version . I f yo u hav e an yquestion s concernin g thi s request , pleas e contac t eithe rmysel f (919-941-0333 ) o rMr . Keit h Barnett , USEPA , a t 919-541-5605 . Than k yo u verymuc h fo ryou rcooperation . Sincerely , Kennet h R . Meardo n Kennet h R . Meardo n Pacifi cEnvironmenta l Services , Inc . KRMeardon@mactec.co m 

### (919)941-033 3 i EP AAI R DOCKE ; CC : Barnett , Keit h
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000727069
<NAME>                                               PS PARTNERS II, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                            1
<CURRENCY>                                                         U.S. $

<S>                                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                         1
<CASH>                                                          1,085,000
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                     103,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                1,188,000
<PP&E>                                                         70,105,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (32,148,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 53,252,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             616,000
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     37,670,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   53,252,000
<SALES>                                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               14,369,000
<CGS>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   4,974,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                3,029,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 4,634,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             4,634,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    4,634,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       31.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       31.59


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7401** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MARIO REGINALD ROGERS , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middl e District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. James A. Beaty, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00120

- JAB

- 1; 1:08

- cv - 00881

- JAB

WWD )

Submitted : January 13, 2011 Decided: February 25 , 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
. Mario Reginald Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CUR IAM: Mario Reginald Rogers seeks to appeal the district court’s order and judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circui t justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the distr ict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (20 00); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rogers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We di spense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boiler MACT Rule

Higgins, Cortney

to:

Jim Eddinger, Nick Hilosky, Thomas Gillis, Mary Joh nson, Amy Hambrick, Sarah Rees

05/25/2012 03:47 PM

HI all,

Attached is the handout from this meeting.

Regards,

Cortney

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E.

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Boiler MACT Rule

When: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:00 AM-11:30 AM (UTC-05:00 ) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 10103 New Executive Office Building

This meeting was requested by Peter Pagano, America n Iron and Steel Institute.



# (See attached file: 2060-AR13_2012_5_15_AISI_Handou t1.pdf)
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Marc D. Olin, Chief Executive Officer, of Printcafe Software, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

(a) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

* * *




                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                             /s/ Marc D. Olin
                             ------------------------------

                             Marc D. Olin

                             Date:  May 15, 2003
                                   -----------------
#### Spacht, Appellee, *v.*The Cincinnati Street Ry. Co., Appellant.

(No. 27374

Decided March 22, 1939.)

*189
      *Mr. Jack Glenn Williams,*for appellee.

*Mr. Leo J. Brumleve, Jr.,*for appellant.

By the Court.

In tlie Court of Common Pleas, Ida Mae Spacht brought an action against The Cincinnati Street Railway Company "for damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision between a street car and an automobile in which she was riding. Trial to jury resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The trial court set aside the verdict and granted a new trial on motion of the plaintiff.

The defendant appealed on questions of law to the Court of Appeals, which sustained a motion to dismiss the appeal, holding that the order granting a new trial was not a “judgment” within the purview of Section 6, Article IV of the Constitution, and that Section 12223-2, General Code (117 Ohio Laws, 615), was unconstitutional insofar as it defined as a reviewable final order the vacating or setting aside of a general verdict of a jury and ordering new trial.

Finding the judgment, upon which they had agreed, to be in conflict with *State*v. *Wright,*59 Ohio App., 191, 17 N. E. (2d), 428, the judges of the Court of Appeals certified the record to this court for review and final determination.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of *Hoffman*v. *Knollman, ante,*170, this day decided.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
#### Elmer HARDY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27773.

Court of Criminal Appeal of Texas.

Nov. 2, 1955.

*234R. -E. Murphey, Coleman, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

: MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

i "The offense is the sale of whiskey in a dry area, with a prior conviction alleged to enhance the punishment; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $500.

Our State’s Attorney confesses error herein because of the failure of the evidence to establish that the sale alleged was made in the area proved to be dry. In this, he is correct. The local option liquor la.w, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 667-2, is a special law and not effective in political subdivisions unless it has been adopted by a vote of the people. In violations of law adopted by local option elections, the locus of the offense is an integral part of the proof. This is not a question of venue but a determination of .whether or not the act committed’is á crime. Sims v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 192, 247 S.W.2d 1022; Teal v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 289, 263 S.W.2d 260, and Yarbrough v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 302, 263 S.W.2d 557.

We further note that the place where the sale was alleged to have been made was alleged with unnecessary particularity, and no proof was offered to support such unnecessary averments. See Daulton v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 335, 235 S.W.2d 165; Staley v. State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 546, 229 S.W.2d 170, and Vaught v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 623, 171 S.W.2d 128.

We also observe that no proof was offered that the order of the Commissioners Court declaring the results of the prohibition election had ever been published as required by the statute. Notice to the public of the results of such election is essential. Bell v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 440, 243 S.W.2d 585, and Moore v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 512, 244 S.W.2d 240.

The judgment is reversed-and the cause remanded.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 10, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00570-CV

BILLY KALLUS, Appellant

V.

AUCTION.COM, Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-37654

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 7, 2013. The clerk’s record 

was filed September 26, 2013. No reporter’s record was filed. 

On November 26, 2013, appellant filed a brief that was not in compliance 

with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(a) and (i). 

In particular, appellant failed to provide adequate citations to the record. Tex. R. 

App. P. 38.1(i).
2

On March 11, 2014, we ordered appellant’s brief filed November 26, 2013, 

stricken. Appellant was ordered to file a brief that complied with the Texas Rules 

of Appellate Procedure within ten (10) days. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1.

Appellant was informed that if he filed another brief that did not comply 

with Rule 38, the Court may strike the brief, prohibit appellant from filing another, 

and proceed as if appellant had failed to file a brief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a). 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a), where an appellant has 

failed to file a brief, we may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

Appellant filed no response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Donovan.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

I, Joseph J. Whang, Chief Financial Officer, of Printcafe Software, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, hereby certify that:

(a) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

* * *




                        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


                        /s/Joseph J. Whang
                        ------------------------------
                        Joseph J. Whang

                        Date:  May 15, 2003
                              -----------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Registrant is a limited partnership which invests in real estate, and real
estate joint ventures.  In accordance with industry practice, its balance 
sheet is unclassified.  For full information, refer to the accompanying 
audited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,974,627
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  908,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,613,496<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,018,003<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,613,496<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,453,915<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,599,707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,854,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,854,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,854,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    60.72<F5>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net investments
in real estate of $10,624,347, real estate hold for sale of $15,761,239 and
net deferred leasing commissions of $345,238.
<F2>Represents partners' capital.
<F3>Liabilities include accounts payable and accrued liabilities of 
$484,705 and other liabilities of $110,788.
<F4>Total revenue includes rent of $6,325,230, gain on sale of real estate
of $1,470,551, equity in earnings of joint venture of $2,483,485, and interest 
and other revenue of $174,649.
<F5>Represents net income per Unit of limited partnership interest.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 9858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Investigator Initiated Extended 
Clinical Trial (R01 Clinical Trial Required).
    Date: March 8, 2024.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 
20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Lindsey M. Pujanandez, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Immunology Review Branch, Scientific Review Program, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and 
Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, MSC 9834, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 627-3206, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#187471767c6b7d6136686d72797679767c7d6258767170367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e5257505a4d5b47104e4b545f505f505a5b447e50575610595148">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 6, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-02773 Filed 2-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### CURTIS AND COMPANY, Inc., Relator, v. Hon. Joe WADE, District Judge, Respondent.

Motion No. 19516.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 18, 1959.

*860Woodrow Curtis, Pearsall, for appellant.

Aycoclc & Steinle, Jourdanton, for ap-pellee.

PER CURIAM.

Relator, Curtis and Company, Inc., has filed a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of mandamus requiring Hon. Joe Wade, Judge of the District Court of McMullen County, Texas, to set aside and expunge from the record, his order dated May 23, 1959, granting L. L. Graham a new trial in Cause No. 766, styled Curtis and Company, Inc., v. L. L. Graham, and to reinstate the judgment nil dicit rendered in said cause on April 20, 1959.

For the purpose of passing upon relator’s motion, we may assume that no motion for a new trial was filed within ten days after the rendition of the judgment as required by Rule 329-b(l), Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and that the order granting the new trial was rendered more than thirty days after the rendition of the judgment nil dicit, in violation of Rule 329-b(5), T.R.C.P., yet we would not have jurisdiction to grant the petition as we do not have supervisory jurisdiction over trial courts. All the jurisdiction we have to grant original writs of mandamus is found either in Art. 1823 or 1824, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. Stats.

It is clear that the provisions of Art. 1824 do not here apply, and under the provisions of Art. 1823, we can only grant the writ of mandamus for the purpose of protecting or preserving our appellate jurisdiction. We fail to see how we would be protecting any appellate jurisdiction by granting the writ of mandamus prayed for in the petition.

The motion for leave to file is overruled.