alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 30, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00138-CV

IN THE MATTER OF Z.T.

On Appeal from the 305th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JD-20-00919-X

ORDER

Before the Court is the April 28, 2021 request of Pamela Sumler, Official 

Court Reporter for the 305th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file 

the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and extend the time to May 10, 

2021. Because this is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order certifying 

appellant to be tried as an adult, we caution Ms. Sumler that no further extension 

requests will be granted. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 56.01(c), (h-1); see also

Order Accelerating Juvenile Certification Appeals and Requiring Juvenile Courts 

to Give Notice of the Right to an Immediate Appeal, Texas Supreme Court, Misc. 
Docket No. 15-9156 (Tex. 2015) (which may be accessed at the following address: 

http://www.txcourts.gov/media/1055398/159156.pdf.). 

Failure to file the reporter’s record by May 10th will result in the Court 

taking any available measure to ensure the record is filed.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE
#### James E. FAULKNER, Appellant, v. Eugene JOHNSON et ux., Appellees.

No. 4265.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Oct. 15, 1964.

James E. Faulkner, Coldspring, pro se.

Rachel Johnson, Pasadena, for appellee.

WILSON, Justice

The appeal is from a decree ordering adoption of appellant’s children by his divorced wife, (the children’s mother), and her present husband.

One of appellant’s points asserts that absent his written consent to adoption, in the absence of pleading and proof of his abandonment and desertion, or that the children were dependent and neglected, or that parental rights had been ordered terminated, adoption was not authorized under Sec. 6, Art. 46a, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. The statute provides an additional exception to adoption without the written consent of the parents: “if such parent or parents shall have not contributed substantially to the support of such child” during a two-year period “commensurate with his financial ability”. This was the pleaded basis of the decree. The contention is untenable.

Appellant then says, as we understand his points, that the undisputed evidence established as a matter of law that he did contribute substantially to the support of the children commensurate with his financial ability so as to conclusively negate existence of the statutory exception. His argument is that the evidence shows without dispute that he contributed more than was required by a 1957 divorce decree which fixed the monthly child support payments he was to make. We have examined the entire record. It clearly does not support the contention; it does sustain the determination of the trial court that the statutory exception exists

Another point challenges the overruling of appellants demand for a trial by jury. The issue of fact as to whether the statutory exception to the consent requirement existed was tried and determined without a jury at appellant’s instance in 1962 on his plea in abatement. He did not *874then request a jury trial, and waived trial by jury on that issue. The adoption statute, moreover, “makes it the duty of the trial court or judge, as distinguished from a jury, to grant or deny a petition for adoption.” Hickman v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 238 S.W.2d 838, writ refused. The point is overruled.

Other points have been considered and are overruled. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section
1350, as adopted), Richard P. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of Aradigm
Corporation (the "Company"), and Thomas C. Chesterman, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the "ANNUAL
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 19th
day of March 2003.

/s/ Richard P. Thompson                                 /s/ Thomas C. Chesterman
-----------------------                                 ------------------------

 Richard P. Thompson                                     Thomas C. Chesterman
Chief Executive Officer                                 Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1291 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 

Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2011 

Mr. COLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into 

trust for Indian tribes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY REAFFIRMED. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION.—Section 5 of the Act of June 

5 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization 

6 Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 465), is amended in the first sentence 

7 by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting ‘‘Except in 

8 Alaska, the Secretary’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1291 IH

1 (b) REAFFIRMATION.—Section 19 of the Act of June 

2 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization 

3 Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 479), is amended— 

4 (1) in the first sentence— 

5 (A) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the 

7 term’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘any recognized Indian 

9 tribe now under Federal jurisdiction’’ and in10 serting ‘‘any federally recognized Indian tribe’’; 

11 and 

12 (2) by striking the third sentence and inserting 

13 the following: ‘‘In this section, the term ‘Indian 

14 tribe’ means any Indian or Alaska Native tribe, 

15 band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the 

16 Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an 

17 Indian tribe.’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall take effect as if included in the Act of 

20 June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘Indian Reorga21 nization Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 479), on the date of enactment 

22 of that Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000725261
<NAME> DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1984-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         110,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               247,168
<PP&E>                                      30,207,520
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,815,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 710,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     668,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   710,366
<SALES>                                        566,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               574,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  253,655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                320,980
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            320,980
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   320,980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002



I, Brian Bonar, hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dalrada Financial Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2024 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Dalrada Financial Corporation
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:  January 13, 2025 |  |                                                                                             
|------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |  |                                                                                             
|                         |  |                                                                                             
|                         |  | /s/ Brian Bonar                                                                             
|                         |  | Brian Bonar                                                                                 
|                         |  | President, Chief Financial Officer, and Director                                            
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 3, 2023

No. 04

- 23

- 00176

- CR

IN RE Darvin PEREZ

- HERNANDEZ

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

On March 6, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion to stay the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus, which this court granted in part on March 8, 2023. After consider ing the petition, real party in interest’s response, and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a) . The stay imposed on March 8, 202 3 is LIFTED

.

It is so ORDERED on May 3, 2023

.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of May, 2023

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 14047CR , styled State of Texas v. Darvin Perez

- Hernand ez , pending in the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 24, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 10-14327

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 4:06-cr-00055-RH–WCS-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus

ERIC LYNN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

_________________________

(June 24, 2011)

Before BARKETT, PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Spivey, appointed counsel for Eric Lynn in this appeal, has

moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lynn’s revocation of supervised release

and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED. 

2
EXHIBIT 32.2



PARK BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



As adopted pursuant to



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Park Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 7, 2006 (the Report), I, Steven J. Pokrak, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Steven J. PokrakSteven J. PokrakTreasurer and Chief Financial OfficerApril 7, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2014

No. 04-14-00358-CV

Juanita SPRUTE, M.D. and Jefferson Family Practice Associates,

Appellants

v.

Arnold L. LEVEY,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-02406

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants and Cross-Appellees' Motion to Dismiss is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
BALTIA AIR LINES

JFK International Airport

Building 151, Jamaica, NY 11430

(principal executive offices)

October 24, 2014

Ms. Lauralyn J. Remo

Chief, Air Carrier Fitness Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

u.s. Department of Transportation

Re: Docket: DOT-OST-2007-0007

Application of Baltia Air Lines, Inc.

Section 41102 Certificate Authority

Dear Ms. Remo:

This letter supplements Baltia's letter of November 202013 regarding progress in the

Company's FAA certification.

Please be advised that on October 10, 2014, Baltia Air Lines passed Gate Two and

moved into phase three of FAA Certification. Phase three consists of the Table Top Exercise,

Mini-Evacuation Demonstration, and Proving Flights. See attached letter of 10.10.2014.

October 23,2014, the C4 Check was completed and Baltia's B747 Aircraft passed

inspection. The C4 check, sometimes referred to as a D Check, occurs every six years and

involves structural and systems testing using X-ray, ultrasound, and other methods.

Respectfully,

Baltia Air Lines, Inc.

by /s/ _

Steffanie J. Lewis, General Counsel

Baltia Air Lines, Inc.

1915 I Street, NW, 5

TH FI

Washington, DC 20006-2118

Tel: 202 296-1111

Fax: 202 296-1175

Email: slewis@iblf.com

Enc: FAA letter dated October 10,2014.

cc: Dmitrowsky
BALTIA SERVICE LIST - updated 10/24/2014

dana. b.ca rver@faa.gov;donald.fields@mwaa.com; dva ugha n@kelleydrye.com; hka me n@coalr.com;

jeffrey. m an Iey@united.com; ma rk. treadaw ay@mwaa.com; kevi n. m 0ntgo me ry@PolarAirCargo.com;

msinlck@ssd.com; nssparks@fedex.com; prrizzi@hhlaw.com; recohn@hhlaw.com;

rpom mer@atlasair.com; sacha. va nderbellen@delta.com; sbrocch i@panynj.gov

____ /S/ _

Steffanie J. Lewis October 24,2014
U.S.Deportment

of TransportatIon

Federal Aviation

Administration

October 10, 2014

East Michigan Flight Standards District Office Willow Run Airport - East Side

8800 Beck Road

Belleville, Michigan 48111

Ph: (734) 487-7222

Fax: (734) 487-7221

HAND DELIVERED

Mr. Igor Dmitrowsky

CEO, Baltia Air Lines

804 Willow Run Airport

Ypsilanti, MI 48198

RE: Gate II

Dear Mr. Dmitrowsky:

This letter is to inform Baltia Air Lines (BTJA) ofthe results of the Certification Project

Team (CPT) evaluation ofBaltia's manuals and processes thus far in the certification

project. The guidance and evaluation standards were drafted from 8900.1 Volume 10

Chapter 6 sec 2. The manual revisions, programs and document package were found to be

satisfactory to continue towards certification.

In addition to what is listed above, a final review was conducted for the Gate II requirements

listed on table 8900.1 Volume 10 Chapter 6 sec 2. The CPT has determined that BTIA has

met those requirements with the exception of an approved B747-200 Minimum Equipment

List (MEL) which is pending your submission ofthis manual. This approved manual will be

required for your requested ops spec, performance plan and intended operation.

Please contact this office at (734) 487-7276 with any questions.

?:lL

Dana B Carver

Certification Project Manager-BTIAP

EMI FSDO GL23
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 5, 2009 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 5, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 14, 2009 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 111 (Monday, June 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 34654]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13475]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

 Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for June 20, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing CFAStaff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: May 28, 2013, in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
AIA, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-13475 Filed 6-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6331-01-M
```
Joinder Agreement, dated as of March 12, 2004, executed by Bombardier Recreation



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 JOINDER AGREEMENT 
  
 JOINDER AGREEMENT, dated as of March 12, 2004, among Bombardier (Mexico) S.A. de C.V. 
  
 1. Reference is hereby made to that certain registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights
Agreement”), dated as of December 18, 2003, among Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., the Guarantors thereto and the Representative on behalf of the Initial Purchasers. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Registration Rights Agreement. 
  
 2. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that it has received and reviewed a copy of the Registration Rights Agreement, and acknowledges and agrees to (i) join and become a party to the Registration Rights Agreement as
a Guarantor as indicated by its signature below and to execute and deliver a Supplemental Indenture (as defined in the Indenture) and to deliver a notation of its Guarantee to be endorsed on each Note authenticated under the Indenture; (ii) be bound
by all covenants, agreements, representations, warranties and acknowledgments of a Guarantor in the Registration Rights Agreement; and (iii) perform all obligations and duties required of a Guarantor pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement.
The undersigned hereby makes as of the date hereof all of the representations and warranties of a Guarantor in the Registration Rights Agreement. 
  
 3. This Joinder Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall
together constitute one and the same Joinder Agreement. 
  
 4.
THIS JOINDER AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. 
  
 [Signature Page Follows] 
  









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Joinder Agreement to be duly executed and delivered
in New York, New York, by its proper and duly authorized officer as of the date set forth above. 
  

			
	BOMBARDIER (MEXICO)
S.A. de C.V.
		
	By:	 	 
	 	 	 Name:

	 	 	 Title: