alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bueford J. MOUNCE, Jr., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 03-3092.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Jan. 23, 2003.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 10082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--SIP24-001, Understanding the 
Needs of Ovarian Cancer Survivors; SIP24-002, Survivorship Care Plans 
and Mortality Among Adult Cancer Survivors; and SIP24-005, How Does 
Reducing Social Isolation and Loneliness Impact Health Indices Among 
Cancer Survivors?
    Date: April 30, 2024.
    Time: 10 a.m.-6 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference/Web Conference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Catherine Barrett, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop S106-3, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341-3717. Telephone: (404) 718-7664; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9edddcffececfbeaeadefdfafdb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4f7f6d5c6c6d1c0c0f4d7d0d79ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-02877 Filed 2-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Mint Preston RAGER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 35082.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1963.

No Attorney on Appeal, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, two years.

The witness Korff testified that he lived inside his place of business, that on the night in question he heard a noise in the area of the front door which led into the office section of the building, that he went to investigate and discovered appellant inside the office and a companion in the act of entering the front door. Korff asked the two how they had gotten in and, after seeing the glass on the floor, charged them with having broken in. The companion fled at once while appellant said, “now just a minute” several times while retreating to the door and he then fled. Korff stated that he had seen appellant seated on the curb in the neighborhood earlier in the evening. It was shown that he picked appellant out of a lineup following his arrest.

Appellant did not testify but called his father and the owner of a bar by whom he attempted to establish an alibi.

We find the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

No brief has been filed, but appellant brings forward several bills of exception in which he complains of the court’s charge. As qualified, they reflect that the court allowed counsel 90 minutes to prepare his *943objections to the charge and that none was presented, that the charge was read to the jury and argument was begun before any obj ections were made. There is no showing in the bill that appellant requested additional time in which to prepare his objections. Under this record, the objections came too late. Spears v. State, 148 Tex.Cr., 86, 184 S.W.2d 629. We have, however, examined the objections and find them to be without merit.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

ROBERTO PAYNE CORDOVA, a.k.a.

Oscar Geobani Padilla, a.k.a. Oscar 

Geobany Padilla-Cordova, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-10173 

D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00160-CKJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

Roberto Payne Cordova appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for reentry of a 

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 19 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-10173 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cordova’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no 

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have 

provided Cordova the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se 

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
From: Brian Ashbrook [ mailto:Brian.Ashbrook@ormet.com ]

Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 1:13 PM
To: Putney, David Subject: RE: section 114 testing

Mr. Putney,

Attached are files that should answer all questions you had during your initial review of Ormet’s data. Attached are Ormet’s letter to OEPA notifyin g them of the special sapling, Ormet’s laboratory t est plan that was followed for sample collection, Ormet’s em ission report , and a revised Table 3-1.

If there are still questions or concerns, please le t me know.

I can be reached at 740-483-2732.

Thanks,
Brian Ashbrook

p.1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0                     804
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   1,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                 (1,331)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  26,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  95,435
<PP&E>                                               0                 494,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                (80,950)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 546,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  49,741
<BONDS>                                              0                 291,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                  59,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 546,819
<SALES>                                        145,618                 186,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,618                 186,240
<CGS>                                           98,478                 126,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,355                 173,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,326)                 (1,448)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,414                  27,027
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,949                (12,485)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (56)                 (8,601)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,005                 (3,884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,005                 (3,884)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
ACCEPTED 06-15-00030-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 11/12/2015 3:07:32 PM DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK
BRIAN A WALLAESA 

In the matter of: 

Federal Aviation 

Administration, 

Complainant 

BRIAN WALLAESA 

Respondent. 

RECEIVED 

MOV 1 5 2010 

HEARING DOCKET 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-0628 

Case No. 20 lOWP 190018 

Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder 

Documents Contained within this Filing 

f ^ 

'U 

" •O 

;,:;'-.;•; z a 

-r,0= i 

ooo 

O"! 

Brian Wallaesa (Respondent) herby files an answer to the Administrative Law 

Judge regarding complaint Filed July 28,2010, and as a response in the mutually agreed 

upon date of November 15,2010. The docimients that are included are as follows: 

1. Motion to Dismiss Complaint Filed July 28, 2010 

2. Objection to Motion for Protective order. 

3. List of Witnesses for Respondent. 

4. Testimony of Respondent. 

5. Motion to Grant Extension of Time for discovery and exhibits. 

6. Certifi cate of Service. 

This information is submitted on the fifteenth day of November, 2010 by the 

Respondent. 
Dated November 15,2010 

Respectfully Sutimijted, 

A. Wallaesa 

Respondent 

11272 Wortham Crest Circle 

Manassas, VA 20109 

(570) 778-1335
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-7-2024]

An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by the Department of Economic Development and Commerce, grantee of FTZ 61, requesting an expansion of Subzone 61Z on behalf of Oldach Associates, LLC. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on February 7, 2024.

The applicant is requesting authority to expand the subzone to include a new site located at Urbanización Industrial Luchetti, Street C, Lot 10, in Bayamón (Site 2—1.85 acres). The applicant is further requesting that the expanded subzone (existing and proposed) not be subject to FTZ 61's 1,821.07-acre activation limit. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time.

In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the FTZ Board.

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is March 25, 2024. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to April 8, 2024.                

                    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information Section” section of the FTZ Board's website, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

                    For further information, contact Camille Evans at                     *Camille.Evans@trade.gov.*

Dated: February 7, 2024.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-02897 Filed 2-12-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### J. D. HARWELL, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 36901.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 22, 1964.

No attorney of record on appeal, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDonald, judge.

Appellant was charged by information in the County Court of Hunt County, Texas, as follows: “did then and there in said County and State, unlawfully and willfully injure a fence gate then and there situated in said County by lifting said gate off its hinges so as to prevent the use of said gate, said gate then and there being the property of Jim Arnold, injuring said gate without the consent of the said Jim Arnold, said gate being of the value of more than five dollars and less than the value of fifty dollars, against the peace and dignity of the state.” The judgment reflects that trial was had before the Court without the aid of a jury upon a plea of guilty. The punishment assessed by the Court was ten (10) days in jail and costs.

No brief has been filed by the appellant, nor has one been filed by the State. There is no statement of facts. We have before us only the transcript which reflects no formal bills of exception.

In drafting the information in this cause the prosecutor evidently proceeded pursuant to the terms of Article 1352 Vernon’s Ann.P.C. which is an article of the penal code prescribing punishment for breaking, pulling down or injuring the fence of another without his consent, or willfully and without the consent of the owner thereof open and leave open any gate leading into the enclosure of another * * *. This statute prescribes the following penalty: “[Hje shall be fined not less than ten nor more than one hundred dollars, and in addition thereto may be imprisoned in jail not exceeding one year.” We observe that Article 1350 V.A.P.C. is the general statute prescribing a penalty for willfully injuring or destroying any property belonging to another, hut this statute shall not be applicable when the law provides a particular punishment for the willful injury or destruction of a certain *957type of property such as a fence. This article prescribes punishment based upon the value of the property destroyed or the extent of the injury inflicted; so the state evidently borrowed from this statute in making the allegation as to the value of the gate. This allegation as to value would, of course, be unnecessary in tracking the terms of Article 1352, supra, which it is apparent to us that the state did.

We observe that the judgment assessing appellant punishment at ten days confinement in jail without the imposition of a fine was unauthorized and calls for a reversal of the conviction. Pizzitola v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 372 S.W.2d 676; Persall v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 476, 169 S.W.2d 488.

For the reasons stated the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for another trial.
Form of Letter Agreement




 Exhibit 10.11 
  
 SAND HILL IT SECURITY ACQUISITION CORP. 
  
                     , 2004 
  
 Sand Hill Security LLC 
 3000 Sand Hill Road 
 Building 1, Suite 240 
 Menlo Park, California 94025 
  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date (“Effective Date”) of the
registration statement for the initial public offering (“IPO”) of the securities of Sand Hill IT Security Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) and continuing (i) until the consummation by the Company of a “Business
Combination” (as described in the Company’s IPO prospectus), (ii) 18 months from commencement of the IPO if the Company does not effect a Business Combination, or (iii) 24 months from the consummation of the IPO if a letter of intent,
agreement in principle or definitive agreement has been executed within 18 months of commencement of the IPO and the Company has not effected a Business Combination, Sand Hill Security LLC shall make available to the Company certain office and
secretarial services as may be required by the Company from time to time, situated at 3000 Sand Hill Road, Building 1, Suite 240, Menlo Park, California 94025. In exchange therefore, the Company shall pay Sand Hill Security LLC the sum of $7,500 per
month on the Effective Date and continuing monthly thereafter. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 SAND HILL IT SECURITY
 ACQUISITION CORP.

		
	 By:
	 	  


	 Name:
	 	 Humphrey P. Polanen

	 Title:
	 	 Chairman of the Board



  

			
	 AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

	
	 SAND HILL SECURITY LLC

		
	 By:
	 	  


	 Name:
	 	  


	 Title:
EXHIBIT 99.2




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Steven J. Pokrak, Chief Financial Officer of Park Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report on Form10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification
is attached as an exhibit (the "Report'), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


Dated:  March 21, 2003                                   /S/ Steven J. Pokrak
                                                         ----------------------
                                                         Steven J. Pokrak
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C U IT LIQIANG GU,

Pe t i tione r,
v. R OB ER T M . W ILKINSON, Ac ting Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 13-72936 Age n c y No. A087-957-069
ORDER

B e fore : WARDLAW , B ER ZON, a nd R AW LINSON, C i rc u it Judge s. The pa ne l ha s vote d to gra

nt Gu’ s Pe t ition for Pa

ne l R e he aring in light of this C ourt’ s e n ba

n c de c ision in Torre

s v . Barr , No. 13-70653, 2020 W L 5668478 (9th C ir. Se pt. 24, 2020) (e n ba nc ) (ove rruling Minto v . Se ssions , 854 F.3d 619 (9th C ir. 2017)). The prior m e m orandum disposition (Dkt. 64) in this ca se is va c a te d. Gu’ s pe tition for re vie w of the orde r of the B o ard of Im m igration Appe a ls is
re m ande d to the a ge nc y

to de te rm ine in the first insta nc e whe t he r a lte rnative grounds for re m ova

bility e xist unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1182(a )(6)(A)(I). The Pe tition for Pa

ne l R e he aring is GR

ANTED a

nd the c a se is R EM A NDED for furthe r proc e e dings not inc onsiste nt with this orde r. 

# FIL ED

FEB 19 2021 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALSThe Pe tition for R e he aring e n ba nc is de n ie d a s m oot.

2
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  and in connection  with the filing by Soyo
Group,  Inc. (the "Company") with the Securities and Exchange  Commission of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2004 (the
"Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:


                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
         in all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of
         operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ MING TUNG CHOK
-------------------------------
Name:  Ming Tung Chok
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Date:  November 17, 2004


/s/ NANCY CHU
-------------------------------
Name:  Nancy Chu
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:  November 17, 2004
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1246 

To reduce the amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to the 

Department of Defense for printing and reproduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2011 

Mr. WEST introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To reduce the amounts otherwise authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Defense for printing and 

reproduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN AMOUNTS OTHERWISE AU4 THORIZED TO BE APPROPRIATED TO THE DE5 PARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR PRINTING AND 

6 REPRODUCTION. 

7 The following amounts otherwise authorized to be ap8 propriated for fiscal year 2012 for the Department of De9 fense are hereby reduced by 10 percent: 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1246 IH

1 (1) The amount for Operation and Maintenance 

2 for the Army, for printing and reproduction. 

3 (2) The amount for Operation and Maintenance 

4 for the Navy, for printing and reproduction. 

5 (3) The amount for Operation and Maintenance 

6 for the Marine Corps, for printing and reproduction. 

7 (4) The amount for Operation and Maintenance 

8 for the Air Force, for printing and reproduction. 

9 (5) The amount for Operation and Maintenance 

10 for Defense-wise activities, for printing and repro11 duction. 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS