alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ALFIN INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                         658,378
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                   844,162
<INVENTORY>                                  2,227,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,933,886
<PP&E>                                       2,333,028
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,740,341
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,610,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,679,738
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          750,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       117,879
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,180,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,610,511
<SALES>                                     24,700,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,700,684
<CGS>                                        8,183,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,394,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               986,320
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,013
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,929,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    79,414
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,008,562)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,008,562)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov

Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 6:01 PM

To: Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov; Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov

Cc: james.tamm@dot.gov; Sutton, Tia; Hengst, Benjamin; Spears, Matthew

Subject: Fw: Questions from OMB on 6/10 passback 

Attachments: EPA and NHTSA Responses to Interagency Comments Received on June 5 2015 

Updated Confirmed 150611.docx

Attached please find our updated response, per your earlier conversation with EPA. 

Thanks 

Tim 

From: Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov<mailto:Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov> [mailto:Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:57 AM 

To: Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov<mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>; Hengst, Benjamin; Sutton, Tia; 

james.tamm@dot.gov<mailto:james.tamm@dot.gov> 

Cc: Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov<mailto:Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov> 

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on HD Phase II NOPR 

Chad and Chandana, 

We have accepted and incorporated these specific interagency recommended edits, except as noted and explained in 

the attached file. 

Thanks, 

Tim 

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 5:57 PM 

To: 'Hengst, Benjamin'; 'Sutton, Tia'; Mullins, Timothy (OST); Tamm, James (NHTSA) 

Cc: Achanta, Chandana L. 

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on HD Phase II NOPR 

All, Few responses to the redline passback from 5_29. Please let me know if you would like to discuss. Thanks, Chad
CHAIRMAN OFTHE BOARD JEFFREY L. HOLLISTER Pres~dent, Vanguard Paintsand Finishes,Inc. PRESIDENT ERIC L. BURKLAND July 14,2011 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Water Docket Mail Code: 4203: 4203M 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC20460 Attn: Docket ID No: EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0667 Dear Administrator Jackson: 

# anufacturers OCEATION

I am pleased to provide these comments on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) proposed cooling water intake structure rule (water rule) that was published inthe Federal Register onApril 20, 2010 at 76 FR 22, 174. The Ohio Manufacturers' Association (OMA) is in its 10lSt year representing the manufacturing industry in Ohio. The OMA represents over 1500 manufacturing employers in Ohio of all sizes and industries. If implemented, the proposed one-size fits all water rule could have disastrous effects on Ohio's economy through increased electricity rates. Generally, environmental requirements are straight "pass through" costs for electric utilities. This means that, no matter what the amount, if the environmental improvement is required, an electric utility can simply pass alongthe increase to customers through rates. This negative effect can be alleviated without a decrease in environmental protection simply by granting states authority to tailor solutions to their specific needs. As others have commented, the United States Supreme Court made clear that the Clean Water Act allows for an examination of the costs and benefits of effective technologies in individual circumstances. Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper Inc., 129 S.Ct. 1498 (2009). The OMA respectfully urges US EPAto make the following modifications to the water rule: Require cost-benefit analysis for impingement as well as entrainment. Allow states to determine "best technology availableJ' for impingement according to sitespecific assessments. Providecompliance flexibility for impingement national mortality percentage limit or intake velocity limit. These improvements will allow electric utilitiesto comply with the environmental objective of the proposalwithout undue cost increases. As Ohio and America struggle to recoverfrom the prolonged economic slump, effective environmental policies that provide operational flexibility while meeting environmental goals are necessary.



# 77

Kevin Director, Public

# POI^ Services

33 N. HIGH ST, COLUMBUS, OH 43215-3005 614-224-5111 1-800-662-4463 FAX 614-224-1012
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

HAROLD COLLINS AND

CATHERINE TEAGUE

- COLLINS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT

FRIENDS OF JADE COLLINS, A

MINOR, AND JASMINE COLLINS,

A MINOR,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00243

- CV

Appeal from

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2009

- 2736)

J U D G M E N T

This Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes that there was error in

the judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying the plea to the jurisdiction as

it applies to Appellees’ responsible third party claim and render judgment dismissing that claim.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying the plea to the jurisdiction as it applies to Appellees’

premises liability claim and remand the cause to the trial court to allow Appellees an opportunity

to amend their pleading s to cure the jurisdictional defects. We affirm the trial court’s order

denying the plea to the jurisdiction as it applies to Appellees’ negligence claim.

We further order that the Appellant recover from Appellees all costs, both in this Court

and the court below, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for2

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
### DECLARATIO N

COMMONWEALT HO F MASSACHUSETT S )

J ) ; COUNT Y

O F /MtX4 ^ ) COME S NO W

you r Declarant , Edwar dGardner , bein g o f lawfu lag e

an dfirs t

dul y sworn , an dfo r

hi s Declaratio n depose s an dstate s a s follows : 1 . I a m a residen t

o f th e Commonwealt h o f

Massachusetts . 2 . I a m a principa l i n Ne w Englan dSafet y

Partner s LLC , 6 1 Chape lSt. , Newton , M A 02458 , whic h i s i n th e busines s o f

helpin g smal lan dmediu msize dbusines s mitigat e ris k associate dwit h traditionall y disparat e

sphere s o f

influenc e

- Physica lSecurity , Cybe r Securit y

an dCompliance . W e provid e ou r client s wit h comprehensiv e

cybe r an dphysica lsecurit y an dsafet y

services , includin g

executiv e protectio n an dtraining . 3 . I hav e

a vali dMassachusett s driver' s license . I hav e hel da Massachusett s driver' s licens e continuall y

sinc e f^^ /^/^(date) . 4 . I mak e

thi s Declaratio n i n suppor t o f Ne w Englan dSafet y

Partner s LLC' s applicatio n f o r exemptio n fro mFA A rule s t o permi t th e us e o f smal lunmanne daircraf t system s (sUAS) . FURTHE R YOU R DECLARAN T SAYET HNAUGHT . DATE D thi s da y o f 2015 .

mwSduSdne r Subscribe dan dswor n t o befor e m e b y Edwar dGardne r

thi s -^^^^a y



## oi^tiJLt ^"^ 2015 . Witnes s m y

han dan dofficia l seal .

M y commissio n expires : 

# 1 Nomi y 

### ARMIN A MANOUKIA N I Notary PubSc , Cotnmonwealtf i of

Massactiusett s M y Commissio n

Expire s Aug . 27,202 1
EXHIBIT32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Spur Ranch, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy G. Stobie, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;


and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: August 19, 2010
By:
/s/  Jeremy G. StobieJeremy G. StobieChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of InMedica
Development Corporation (the Company) that the Annual Report of the Company on
Form 10-K/A 2 for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such periods and
the results of operations of the Company for such periods.








/s/ Ralph
Henson


Ralph
Henson,


Chief
Executive Officer


DATE:   September  22 ,
2008











/s/ Richard
Bruggeman


Richard
Bruggeman,


Chief
Financial Officer


DATE:    September 26
, 2008
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-0461 Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-159-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 38.0 $3,230.0

0

$0 $3,230.00 71 $229,330.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $229,330

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Corrective Action 98.0 $8,330.00 $6,258 $14,588.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### Ex parte Henry HUFF.

No. 30267.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 15, 1958.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

Relator, an inmate of the prison system, seeks his release by writ of habeas corpus. He was on the 11th day of December, 1937, in the Criminal District Court of Nueces County, convicted under Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., as an habitual criminal. The primary offense charged in the indictment was that of aiding a prisoner who was restrained on a charge of felony to escape from such restraint, as denounced by Article 326, V.A.P.C. The first prior conviction alleged for enhancement was for forgery, secured in the same court on November 19, 1937, and the second prior conviction was likewise for forgery in the same court on the same day, to-wit: November 19, 1937.

Recently, in Ex parte Atkinson, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 546, 288 S.W.2d 89, 90, under a similar situation, we said:

> “It is apparent that since the relator was convicted in both of the Trinity County cases on the same day, neither *897conviction could have preceded the commission of the offense in the other case and the two convictions could not constitute the basis for a prosecution as a third offender under Article 63, V.A.P.C. Ex parte Daniels, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 2, 252 S.W.2d 586.

> “It is further apparent that the indictment is sufficient to charge the relator as a second offender under Article 62, V.A.P.C.”

The punishment in the instant case provided by Article 62, supra, is five years.

Relator has served in excess of five years and is therefore entitled to be discharged. Ex parte Pruett, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 438, 141 S.W.2d 333. The writ is granted, and relator is ordered discharged.
II

Calendar No. 308

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 583

[Report No. 104–206]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of

documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for two vessels.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 21 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 1995

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

JANUARY 26, 1996

Reported by Mr. PRESSLER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for two vessels.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
2

S 583 RS

1 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

2 with a coastwise endorsement for each of the vessels RES3 OLUTION (Serial Number 77NS8701) and

4 PERSERVERANCE (Serial Number 77NS8901).

Calendar No. 308

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 583

[Report No. 104–206]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

wise trade endorsement for two vessels.issue a certificate of documentation and coastJANUARY 26, 1996

Reported without amendment
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Live Current Media Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Geoffrey
Hampson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chairman of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of the
  Company.








/s/
C. Geoffrey
Hampson


C.
Geoffrey Hampson


Chief
Executive Officer


August
14, 2008
Exhibit 32



On August 6, 2004, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Exult, Inc. (the Company) provided a written statement
accompanying the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. A copy of that written statement is set forth below as Exhibit 32. The information in
Exhibit 32 shall not be deemed filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liabilities thereunder. Furthermore, the information in Exhibit 32 shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into the
filings of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933.



Statement of the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Exult, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



This statement, dated August 6, 2004, is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed by Exult, Inc. (the Issuer) with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report).



We hereby certify that, to our knowledge, (a) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



This statement is given in our capacities as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Exult, Inc.



/s/    JAMES C. MADDEN, VJames C. Madden, V Chief Executive Officer




/s/    JOHN A. ADAMSJohn A. Adams Chief Financial Officer
Withdrawal of Petition: 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON D.C. 

OPERATING CERTIFICATE DALA026A 

Docket FAA-2016-0934 

For exemption of certain requirements of 14 

C.F.R. §91.9(a) 

WITHDRAWAL OF PETITION FOR AN EXEMPTION 

June 7, 2016 

Delta Air Lines, Incorporated, operating certificate DALA026A, hereby withdraws the petition for 

exemption for partial relief from Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) §91.9(a) as it relates to the placard 

on the flight deck associated with a Supplemental Type Certificate. 

Please contact Charles M. Schramek, Director Quality Assurance, Compliance and Business Support, at (404) 715-1112 or e-mail at chuck.schramek@delta.com, if you have and questions or need additional 

information. 

Sincerely, 

cc: John Brooke, Principal Operations Inspector, Delta Certificate Management Unit - FAA
Exhibit 10.2

 

AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of March 20, 2017, is entered into by and between POZEN Inc. (the “Company”), and Andrew Koven (the “Executive”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated May 31, 2015 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which the Executive is currently employed by Company; and

 

WHEREAS, Section 15 of the Agreement provides that it may be amended or modified by a written instrument signed by the parties to the Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, the parties, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, agree to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth below.

 

1.                                      By adding the following to the end of Section 3.2 of the Agreement:

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Executive has elected not to be eligible to receive an annual cash incentive award under the Company Annual Incentive Bonus Plan with respect to 2017 (payable in 2018); provided that for purposes of determining the severance payable to Executive under Section 5.2 or 5.5, and for all other purposes, the Annual Cash Bonus payable in 2018 with respect to 2017 shall be deemed to be the target Annual Cash Bonus.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement on the day first above written.

 

	
POZEN INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Eric L. Trachtenberg
    	
 
    
	
Its:
    	
Secretary
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
EXECUTIVE
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Andrew I. Koven
    	
 
    
	
Andrew I. Koven
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0578 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID LLOYD ORR ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 16, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2021

07/12/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0578
1

Werner, Christopher

Subject: Interagency call with OMB and DOJ on Regional Haze Rule Revisions

Location: RTP-OAQPS-C535I/RTP-OAQPS-BLDG-C

Start: Fri 2/19/2016 12:30 PM

End: Fri 2/19/2016 1:30 PM

Recurrence: (none)

Meeting Status: Meeting organizer

Organizer: Werner, Christopher

Required Attendees: Werner, Christopher; Jones, Rhea; Lorang, Phil; Beaver, Melinda; Marks, Matthew; 

Anderson, Lea; VanLare, Paula; Greenglass, Nora; aaron_l_szabo@omb.eop.gov; Wood, 

Anna; Smith, Kristi

Optional Attendees: Balserak, Paul

Resources: RTP-OAQPS-C535I/RTP-OAQPS-BLDG-C

Categories: Regional Haze
<PAGE>




                                                                   EXHIBIT 23(b)


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-60975) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-91950,
2-93578, 33-18278, 33-29014, 33-39215, 33-56420, 33-53303, 333-51073, 333-93803
and 333-93805) of our report dated January 12, 2001 relating to the financial
statements of the Elgin Riverboat Resort-Riverboat Casino as of December 31,
2000 and 1999, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2000, which appears in the filing on Form 10-K/A on or about March 7, 2001, of
Mandalay Resort Group for the year ended January 31, 2000.






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


March 7, 2001
Chicago, Illinois