alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Circuit Research Labs, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Jayson Brentlinger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                         
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                               





| | /s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger                                                                
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | C. Jayson Brentlinger 
Chief Executive Officer
Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
April 14, 2008
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 6, 2003,  accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements included in the Annual Report of Gateway Industries,  Inc.
on Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31,  2002.  We hereby  consent to the
incorporation  by  reference  of said report in the  Registration  Statement  of
Gateway Industries,  Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-38733,  effective January 25,
1991).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
----------------------
GRANT THORNTON LLP

New York, New York
March 11, 2003
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134767 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134767 

 COA: 266805 

Lenawee CC: 05-011519-FC 

JAMES JOSEPH GRABIEC, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 24, 2008 

 Clerk
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOI 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

J&B ENTERPRISES, INC., 

d^/a/ RHYTHM SHINE, 

Complainant, 

V. 

METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE AIRPORT 

AUTHORITY, 

Respondent. 

iiON 

DEC 1 4 2009 

AIRPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL 

LAW, AGC-60Q 

Docket No.: 16-08-07 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS 

Pursuant to 14 CFR § 16.3(1), Attorney for Complainant Thomas J. Henderson, hereby submits 

this Notice of Change of Address. Effective immediately, the contact information for Mr. 

Henderson is as follows: 

Thomas J. Henderson 

Henderson Law Firm, PLLC 

1666 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 310 

Washington, DC 20009 

1:.^^ 

""^ . 

C2 

Respectfully submitted. 

By: 

Thomas J. frienOiBrson 

HENDERSON LAW FIRM, PLLC 

1666 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 310 

Washington, DC 20009 

Telephone: (202) 742-7447 

Facsimile: (202) 742-7776 

tjh@hendersonfirm.net 

Counsel for Complainant 

J&B Enterprises, Inc. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 8* day of December, 2009,1 submitted the Notice of Change of 

Address to the FAA Office of the Chief Counsel via US mail for filing. A true and correct copy 

of the foregoing was served, via US mail upon: 

Arthur P. Berg 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 

445 Park Avenue, 9th Floor 

New York, New York 10022 

Thomas R. Devine 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 

1001 Connecticut Ave., N.W. 

Suite 800 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Lisa Reynolds 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 

1675 Broadway, Suite 2300 

Denver, CO 80202 

Robert Watson 

MNAA 

One Terminal Drive, Suite 501 

Nashville, TN 37214 

Counsel for Complainant 

J&B Enterprises, Inc.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 1841

TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL, as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child A.M. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. VTT MANAGEMENT INC.; VTT CHARLOTTE LLC; DEBBIE HICKS; CHRISTOPHER LOEBSACK; LATONYA CAMERON; BRITTANY BANKS; VICTOR JIMENEZ; MECKLENBURG COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT; MARTA CARSON, in her individual and official capacity; BECKY T. TIN, in her individual and official capacity; DONNIE HOOVER, in his individual and o fficial capacity; ELIZABETH THORTON TROSCH, in her individual and official capacity; JOHN AND JANE DOES 1

- 30 , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv
- 00826

- RJC

- DSC )

Submitted : December 28, 2017 Decided: January 5 , 2018

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tigress Sydney McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. James Daniel McAlister, MCANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Daniel Edward Peterson,2 CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Charlotte, North Carolina; Kathryn Hicks Shields, Assistant Attorney General, N ORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh , North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate ju dge’s memorandum and recommendation and granting some, but not all,
Defendants’ motions to dismiss. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interloc utory and collateral orders,
28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order McDaniel seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant Appellees’
motion to di smiss and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/    DANIEL R.
PASSERI                                                             
|                      |  | Daniel R. Passeri President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934, AS AMENDED**

I, Timothy M. Yager,certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of iPCS, Inc.;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)                Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)               Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)                Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)               Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 13, 2006                |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
|                                   |
| /s/   Timothy  M. Yager      |   |
| Timothy M. Yager                       |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly report of Megola, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Gardner,
acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
       Company.


/s/ Joel Gardner
------------------------
     Joel Gardner
     CEO and CFO


December 15, 2004
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2306** 

ANTHONY MCNAIR , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

N.C. GENERAL ASSEMBLY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 4:13

- cv
- 00155

- F )

Submitted : January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Anthony Lee McNair , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Lee McNair appeals the district court’s order

a dopting in part the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012) for failure to state a claim on which relief may be
granted . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. McNair v. N.C. Gen

. Assembly , No.

4:13

- cv
- 00155

- F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2013)

. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1292 

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that greenhouse gases are not 

subject to the Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2011 

Mr. CUELLAR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that greenhouse 

gases are not subject to the Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Production 

5 Freedom Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATION UNDER CLEAN AIR 

7 ACT. 

8 Section 302(g) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 7602(g)) is amended by adding the following at the end 

10 thereof: ‘‘The term ‘air pollutant’ shall not include carbon 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1292 IH

1 dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, 

2 perfluorocarbons, or sulfur hexafluoride.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. CLIMATE CHANGE NOT REGULATED BY CLEAN AIR 

4 ACT. 

5 Nothing in the Clean Air Act shall be treated as au6 thorizing or requiring the regulation of climate change or 

7 global warming. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 653

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for

the vessel AURA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the

9 coastwise trade for the vessel AURA (United States offi10 cial number 1027807).

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 653

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

coastwise trade for the vessel AURA.propriate endorsement for employment in theissue a certificate of documentation with the ap-
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SATISH SHETTY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. SELENE FINANCE LP, a Delaware Limited Partnership; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 14

- 55790
D.C. No. 2:13

- cv - 03483

- BRO

MAN

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Beverly Reid O’Connell, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2017 **
Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Satish Shetty appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his action alleging federal and state law claims relating to a mortgage loan on real property transferred to him by the borrower . We ha ve jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 24 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 55790

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and we may affirm on an basis supported by the
record. Thompson v. Paul , 547 F.3d 1055, 1058

- 59 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.
Dismissal of Shetty’s action was proper because Shetty failed to allege facts
sufficient to show that he has s tanding to prosecute claims on behalf of the third

party borrower

. See Sprint Commc’ns Co. v. APCC Servs., Inc. , 554 U.S. 269,
273

- 74, 89

- 90 (2008) ( elements of Article III standing; prudential standing requires that a party must assert its own legal rights and may not asse rt the legal rights of another)

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Shetty leave to file
a Fourth Amended C omplaint because amendment would be futile. See Lopez v.
Smith , 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that leave to amend can be denied if amendment would be futile); see also Chodos v. West Publ ’ g Co. , 292 F.3d 992, 1003 (9th Cir. 2002) (a
district court ’ s discretion to deny leave to amend is particularly broad when it has afforded plaintiff one or more opportunities to amend)

. To the extent Shetty is challenging the district court’s order as the representative of a trust, the appeal is dismissed because Shetty, as a non

- attorney, “has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself.” C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States , 81 8 F.2d 696, 697

- 98 (9th Cir. 1987). We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued3 14

- 55790

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

. We reject as without merit Shetty’s contention regarding i neffective
assistance of counsel.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:



1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Clarke H. Bailey                                  
|------------------------------------------------------
|Clarke H. Bailey                                      
|Executive Chairman and Interim Chief
Financial Officer









Date: December 3, 2013



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.2


 


March 20, 2017


 


NioCorp Developments Ltd.


7000 South Yosemite Street, Suite115

Centennial, CO 80112


 


Attention: John F. Ashburn Jr., Vice President
& General Counsel


 


Dear Sirs/Mesdames:


 


		Re:	Amending Agreement -

Loan Agreement between NioCorp Developments Ltd. and Mark Smith



 


Pursuant to a loan agreement between NioCorp
Developments Ltd. (the "Borrower") and Mark Smith (the "Lender") dated June 17th, 2015 and as amended
July 13th, 2016 (the "Loan Agreement"), the Lender advanced a loan to the Borrower on the terms and conditions
set out therein.


 


The Borrower and the Lender wish to amend
the Loan Agreement in the manner set forth herein.


 


INTERPRETATION


 


All words and expressions defined in the
Loan Agreement have the same meaning when used herein. Reference to the Loan Agreement includes amendments thereto from time to
time, including the amendments made by this amending agreement. All references herein to sections of or schedules to an agreement
other than this amending agreement are to sections of and schedules to the Loan Agreement, unless otherwise expressly stated. Clause
headings are for reference only.


 


EFFECTIVE DATE


 


The provisions of the Loan Agreement are
amended as set out in this amending agreement effective as of March 20th, 2017.


 


AMENDMENTS


 


		1.	Section 1.1(h) of the Loan Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following
new Section 1.1(h):



 


“Term” means
a period commencing on the Effective Date, being the date the Lender advanced the Principal to the Borrower, and expiring three
years following the Effective Date.


 




     


     


    

 


MISCELLANEOUS


 


With the exception of the foregoing amendments,
the Loan Agreement and general security agreement executed in connection therewith continue in full force and effect unamended.


 


This amending agreement may be executed
by the parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered (including by facsimile transmission
or as a pdf attachment to an e-mail) shall constitute an original, but all such counterparts when taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument.


 


Please indicate your acceptance of this
amending agreement by signing and returning the enclosed duplicate copy of this letter.


 


	Yours truly,	 
	 	 
	MARK A. SMITH	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Accepted as of the 20th day of March, 2017.	 
	 	 
	NIOCORP dEVELOPMENTS lTD.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	 	 
	 	Name: John F. Ashburn Jr.	 
	 	Title: Vice President & General Counsel	 


 




    	 	– 2 –