alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1**CERTIFICATION***Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode 18 U.S.C. § 1350, V. Bryan Lawlis, Chief Executive Officer of Aradigm Corporation (the“Company”), and Thomas C. Chesterman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 30th day of March 2006.
   /s/ V. Bryan Lawlis /s/ Thomas C. Chesterman   Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer*This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofAradigm Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
p.1 

OAR Box 1490 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

34) IV-C-7 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:46 AM Sheet 34 of 273 
P.2 

[Kenneth Meardon - Comment Letters on RFP Proposed Rule A-94-52 

IV-C-7 

From: 

To: 

Start: 

Due: 

Subject: 

December 3, 

Dear Mr. 

Kenneth Meardon 

Spoerl, John 

12/3/01 

12/3/01 

Comment Letters on RFP Proposed Rule 

2001 

Spoerl: 

As we discussed this morning, Kohler submitted a public comment letter from Mr. Don Goad to Mr. Keith 

Barnett, USEPA, on September 20, 2001 on the proposed MACT standard for reinforced plastic 

composites production. The comments in this letter are associated with Kohler's Huntsville, AL, facility. 

In addition, comment letters associated with Kohler's Brownwood, TX, and Spartanburg, SC, facilites were 

submitted on September 25, 2001. 

In all three letters, Kohler notes that the letter contains information considered proprietary by Kohler and 

requests that EPA handle the information accordingly and exclude this information from the public docket. 

Unfortunately, none ofthe letters identify the specific information considered by Kohler as confidential. 

The purpose of this email is to request that Kohler identify the specific information in each of the three 

letters that Kohler considers to be confidential so that we may be able to put a non-confidential version of 

each letter in the public docket. This may be done by submitting a non-confidential version of each letter 

or by marking-up the original letters in such a manner that we can create a non-confidential version. 

If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact either myself (919-941-0333) or Mr. 

Keith Barnett, USEPA, at 919-541-5605. Thank you very much for your cooperation. 

Sincerely, 

Kenneth R. Meardon 

Kenneth R. Meardon 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. 

KRMeardon@mactec.com 

(919)941-0333 

i 

EPA AIR DOCKE; 

CC: Barnett, Keith
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting
Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D., the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Telik, Inc. (the Company), and Cynthia M. Butitta, the Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:



|1. |  | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the
Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 7, 2003



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    MICHAEL M. WICK                                           
|Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32


                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  and in  connection  with the filing by Soyo Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of its
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  August 18, 2003               By:  /s/ MING TUNG CHOK
                                          -----------------------
                                          Ming Tung Chok
                                          President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer





Date:  August 18, 2003               By:  /s/ NANCY CHU
                                          -----------------------
                                          Nancy Chu
                                          Chief Financial Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                            **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  Cognigen  Networks,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Darrell
H.  Hughes,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                    /s/   Darrell H. Hughes
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Darrell H. Hughes
                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                    September 17, 2002
```
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000726435
[NAME] DANZAR INVESTMENT GROUP
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          APR-30-1996
[PERIOD-END]                               APR-30-1996
[CASH]                                              66
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                    66
[PP&E]                                               0
[DEPRECIATION]                                       0
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                      66
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                             4134
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                          9481
[OTHER-SE]                                     (13849)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                        66
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                   0
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                      0
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                                  0
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                         0
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                        0
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                          58,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,536
<PP&E>                                       2,032,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                 492,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,326,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,850
<BONDS>                                        658,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,530
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,880
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,293,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,326,006
<SALES>                                        691,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               691,691
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  570,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                    31,485
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,781
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,781
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 9282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02729]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12323]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Korean Couture: Generations 
of Revolution'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Korean Couture: Generations of 
Revolution'' at the Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of 
cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f4879197809d9b9ac6c0c1cdb48780958091da939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1063757364797f7e222425295063647164753e777f66">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-02729 Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### William BEASLEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28675.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 12, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record om appeal.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady and Thomas D. White, Assts. Dist. Atty.,. Houston, and Leon Douglas, State’s Atty.,. Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is robbery by assault; the-punishment, 7 years in the penitentiary..

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Millard RICE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 4, 1957.

Harvey Parker, Jr., Vanceburg, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for an appeal from the Gre.enup Circuit Court. Jim Sowards, Judge.

*759We are affirming the judgment in this case imposing a fine of $100 on the appellant and sentencing him to 60 days in jail for possessing alcoholic beverages in Local Option Territory for the purpose of sale because we do not think the appellant’s substantial rights were prejudiced by the closing argument of the Commonwealth’s Attorney.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
#### Ex parte John Leonard LEE.

No. 34206.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 15, 1961.

John Leonard Lee, in pro. per.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus brought by the relator John Leonard Lee, seeking his release from the Texas Prison System.

Relator was on March 4, 1957, convicted upon a plea of guilty in Cause No. 21041 in the Criminal District Court of Jefferson County for the offense of felony theft, and his punishment assessed at two years. He attacks the sufficiency of that portion of the Jefferson County sentence which attempts to cumulate it with additional sentences. It reads as follows:

> “Defendant duly sentenced. And the said defendant, John Leonard Lee, having on the 26th day of February, A. D. 1957 in Harris County, Texas, been duly and legally convicted on 5 cases, and his punishment therefor having been assessed and adjudged at confinement in the penitentiary for 8 years, and he having on the 26th day of February, 1957, by said court, been sentenced in due form of law in accordance with said convictions, it is further considered, ordered and adjudged that the punishment herein adjudged against the said defendant John Leonard Lee, shall begin when the said judgments and sentences on the preceding convictions shall have ceased to operate.”

The attempted cumulation is ineffective in that the designation of the Harris County court is absent. Ex parte Hamilton, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 283, 290 S.W.2d 673; Ex parte Merritt, 195 Tex.Cr.R. 87, 261 S.W.2d 596, and cases cited therein.

*929We have been furnished with a certificate from the Texas Prison System showing that relator has served both sentences unless the cumulation be held effective.

In view of the authorities heretofore cited, we hold that the relator is entitled to be discharged.

It is so ordered.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.12

Fiscal 2004 Bonus Plan For Executive Officers

PRE-BONUS
FISCAL 2004 EARNINGS                   PAYMENTS

Less than $100,000                     No Payments

Less than $122,100                     Pay all amounts greater than $100,000 to
                                       current associates who participated in
                                       the salary reduction program last year up
                                       to amounts not reimbursed (but no match)

PRE-BONUS/POST SALARY REDUCTION        PAYMENTS

Less than $100,000                     No Bonuses

Greater than $100,000                  50% of income in excess of $100,000 to
                                       members of Profit Team up to $10,000
                                       each.

Greater than $180,000                  40% of income in excess of $180,000 up to
                                       $250,000 split between and RLF, 60%/40%
                                       respectively.

Greater than $250,000                  25% of income in excess of $250,000 split
                                       between JRF and RLF, 60%/40%
                                       respectively.

                                    Page 29
#### Geller, Appellant, *v.*McCort, Treas., et al., Appellees; Squire, Supt. of Banks, Appellant.

(No. 27450

Decided March 8, 1939.)

*Messrs. Thornberg £ Lewis, Mr. Edmund L. Mats, Mr. K. Q. Cooper, Messrs. Cowen £ Cowen, Mr. A. W. Kennon, Messrs. Walker £ Walker, Mr. W. O. Chap*pell.and *Mr. W. V. Bennett,*for Cora B. Geller, appellant.

*Mr. Boss Michener,*prosecuting attorney, and *Mr. C. C. Sedgwick,*for C. T. McCort, treasurer, et al., appellees.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. Edmund L. Mats,*for S. H. Squire, superintendent of banks, appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.36
                                  ADRIEN ARPEL

Mr. Harold Lightman
75 East End Avenue, Suite #11E
New York, NY  10028

         Re:  Harold Lightman/Consulting Agreement
                Adrien Arpel, Inc.

Dear Harold:

         When countersigned by you where indicated below the following will
constitute our agreement:

                  1. We have agreed to hire you as a consultant in Marketing,
Merchandising, Advertising, and Sales for our new Direct Mail sales operation
for a term of one year commencing on July 1, 1997 and ending on July 1, 1998.

                  2. After the initial one year period, is it hereby agreed that
by mutual agreement, we can negotiate an extension.

                  3. We guarantee you the sum of $3500 per month. In addition,
we will reimburse to you within thirty days preapproved expenses as per company
guidelines.

                  4. In further consideration for your work and services, Adrien
Arpel, Inc. hereby agrees on July 1, 1997 or commencement date if earlier, to
grant to Harold Lightman the option to purchase 50,000 shares, of common stock
of Alfin, Inc., pursuant to the Alfin, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP").
<PAGE>   2
                                                                   Exhibit 10.36

The exercise price of the shares shall be fixed at the closing price per share
for Alfin, Inc. on the American Exchange on July 1, 1997, or commencement date
if earlier. The vesting schedule for stock options under this grant is as per
Alfin, Inc's. 1993 Stock Option Plan.

                  5. It is understood that you will work in the offices of
Adrien Arpel, Inc. a minimum of three days per week.

                  6. You warrant and represent that you have full authority to
enter into this agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day, month and year first above written.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    By:  S/Elisabeth Fayer

CONSULTANT:

By:  S/H. Allen Lightman

       Harold Allen Lightman

       SS####-##-####
#### SEGUIN MILLING COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. T. D. SEGURA et al., Appellees.

No. 5245.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Nov. 13, 1957.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 1957.

Elbert R. Jandt, Seguin, for appellants.

Frank O. Ray, Alpine, for appellees.

WILLIAMS, Justice.

Appellant’s brief filed herein is hopelessly defective and unsatisfactory. It entirely ignores, or disregards, all of the provisions of Rule 418, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. There are absolutely no points or assignments of error, and no references to the record. The nearest thing to a point of error is found in its “Argument”, to-wit:

> “The trial court erred .when it refused to give to the Seguin Milling Company a judgment over and against the appellees for the money sued for on its cross-action.”

The provisions of Rule 414, T.R.C.P., are likewise disregarded, in that the brief is signed by an individual shown by the record to be attorney for appellant, hut the brief does not so state, nor does it give his post office address, nor does it contain any statement or certificate that a copy of the brief has been delivered to, or mailed to, opposing counsel.

We therefore ordinarily would require re-briefing, as provided for in Rules 422 and 431, T.R.C.P., but in this instance we have decided to consider same.

The record does not contain any findings of fact or conclusions of law by the trial court, or any request for same. In deference to the provisions of Rules 452 and 453, T.R.C.P., we refrain from writing any opinion, other than to say that we have *688carefully reviewed all provisions of said brief and find no reversible error raised therein.

The judgment of the trial court is accordingly affirmed.