alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Distribution

∙ Formulation

∙ Blending

∙ Packaging

P.O. Box 790 ● Waterbury, CT 06720

- 0790● Tel: (203) 756

- 5521 ● Fax: (203) 756

- 9017

www.hubbardhall.com

Better Chemistry. Better Business. United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Washington, DC 20460 Attn: Mr. John Schaeffer, Senior Biologist

Date: April 30

, 2014

CC: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT

- 2009

- 0112

Dear Mr. Schaeffer,

This letter is in regards to the abov e docket and in response to “Failure to Comply with a Test

Rule Issued Under Section 4 of the Toxic Substances Control Act”. Hubbard

- Hall, Inc. is not subje ct to the rule for the following reason:

Hubbard

- Hall, Inc. is not an importer nor manufacturer of Benzenesulfoni c Acid, 3

- nitro

- , sodium salt (1:1) (CASRN 127

- 68

- 4).

Should you require anything further, please feel free to contact me directly at
hmcmillan@hubbardhall.com or via phone at 1

- 864

- 472

- 9031 ext. 2222.

Sincerely,

Henry N. McMillan Jr. Materials Sourcing Manager

Hubbard

- Hall, Inc. 1101 Compton Bridge Road Inman, SC 29349 USA

CC: Rober t Augello, Jim Benning and Lon Solomita
EXHIBIT 24.8

POWER OF ATTORNEY

(Annual Report on Form 10-K)

The undersigned, an officer and/or director of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., constitutes and appoints Nicholas Konidaris and Kerry Mustoe, and each of them, his
or her true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts and things and execute in his or her name as an officer or director of the Company the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2006 and any and all amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agents and each of
them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Any one of said attorneys or agents shall have, and may exercise, all powers conferred.

Dated:
July 20, 2006.



/s/ ROBERT R. WALKERRobert R. Walker
NON-RECOURSE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER

OF STOCK CERTIFICATE

AND OF MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS

This agreement is made by and between Founders Industries, Inc., ("Founders"), and H & M Investment Co. ("H&M"), effective the 1st day of July, 2002.

Founders is the sole owner of the following companies:

          Simpco, Inc., a Texas corporation

          P & A Remediation, LLC., a Texas limited liability company

          P & A Remediation, LLC., an Oklahoma limited liability company

Founders warrants that such ownership is free and clear of any and all encumbrances and restrictions on transfer.

For good consideration, Founders hereby sells, assigns, and transfers to H&M all of its right, title and interest , in an to its 100% ownership of these companies, represented by the execution of assignments of the following certificates:


	 	
-
	
Stock certificate #010 of Simpco, Inc.

	 	
-
	
Membership certificate #003 of P & A Remediation, LLC (Texas)

	 	
-
	
Membership certificate #003 of P & A Remediation, LLC (Oklahoma)





H&M acknowledges that its receipt of ownership of these companies, includes assets owned by each company, subject to the liabilities owed by each company.  H&M further acknowledges that this assignment is totally without recourse against Founders, its successors or assigns, as to any matter, including but not limited to the liabilities, known or unknown, of the companies.

H&M agrees to hold harmless and defend Founders, its successors and assigns, against any claim or assertion by any creditor, known or unknown, of the companies it has acquired from Founders by this instrument and agreement.

SIGNED (as if, although not necessarily on) this 1st day of July, 2003

By:  /s/ Larry Bubenik                                

     Larry Bubenik

_______________________________________

_______________________________________


FOUNDERS INDUSTRIES, INC.


By:  /s/ Bryan L. Walker                            

      Authorized Officer

1026 West Main Street, Suite 104

Lewisville, Texas  75067
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 317 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 317

    To stop the waste of taxpayer funds on activities by Government 
      agencies to encourage its employees or officials to accept 
           homosexuality as a legitimate or normal lifestyle.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 1 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To stop the waste of taxpayer funds on activities by Government 
      agencies to encourage its employees or officials to accept 
           homosexuality as a legitimate or normal lifestyle.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS.

    No funds appropriated out of the Treasury of the United States may 
be used by any entity to fund, promote, or carry out any seminar or 
program for employees of the Government, or to fund any position in the 
Government, the purpose of which is to compel, instruct, encourage, 
urge, or persuade employees or officials to--
            (1) recruit, on the basis of sexual orientation, 
        homosexuals for employment with the Government; or
            (2) embrace, accept, condone, or celebrate homosexuality as 
        a legitimate or normal lifestyle.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1429 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 7, 2011 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of furloughed Federal 

employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret5 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FURLOUGHED FEDERAL EM7 PLOYEES. 

8 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

9 in appropriations which begins on or about April 9, 2011, 

10 shall be compensated at their standard rate of compensaVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:38 Apr 08, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1429.IH H1429

smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1429 IH

1 tion, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, as soon 

2 as practicable after such lapse in appropriations ends. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSKB9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6006
WILBUR DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusJAN BAXLEY; LEAH DEVLIN, Director, Health Services; VERNON MALONE, Cha irman; J. STEWARTADCOCK, Vice Chairman; BETTY LOU WARD, Commissioner; JOHN H. BAKER, Sher iff; SHELIA FORTE RAY, Director of Jail; RICHARD Y. STEVENS, Clerk to the Board, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-907-5-CT-BO) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilbur Davis, Appellant Pro Se. John A. Maxfield, Michael R. Ferrell, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Baxley , No. CA-95-907-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE CITY OF EL PASO, TEXAS,

 Appellant,

v.

HAROLD COLLINS AND

CATHERINE TEAGUE-COLLINS,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT

FRIENDS OF JADE COLLINS, A

MINOR, AND JASMINE COLLINS, 

A MINOR,

 Appellees. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-12-00243-CV

Appeal from

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2009-2736)

J U D G M E N T

This Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes that there was error in 

the judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying the plea to the jurisdiction as 

it applies to Appellees’ responsible third party claim and render judgment dismissing that claim. 

We reverse the trial court’s order denying the plea to the jurisdiction as it applies to Appellees’ 

premises liability claim and remand the cause to the trial court to allow Appellees an opportunity 

to amend their pleadings to cure the jurisdictional defects. We affirm the trial court’s order 

denying the plea to the jurisdiction as it applies to Appellees’ negligence claim.

We further order that the Appellant recover from Appellees all costs, both in this Court 

and the court below, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for 
2

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice 

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 18, 2020

No. 04-20-00401-CV

MESHBESHER & SPENCE, LTD. and Konstandinos Nicklow,

Appellants

v.

TODD MARQUARDT LAW FIRM,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-24208

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 15, 2020, appellants filed a brief that did not contain a table of contents or 

an index of authorities, as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.1. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 38.1(b), (c). On September 17, 2020, appellants filed an amended brief and an unopposed 

motion for leave to file the amended brief. After consideration, appellants’ motion is 

GRANTED. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1369 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1369

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1021 Pennsylvania Avenue in Hartshorne, Oklahoma, as the ``Warren 
                         Lindley Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2011

 Mr. Boren (for himself, Mr. Cole, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. 
    Lucas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1021 Pennsylvania Avenue in Hartshorne, Oklahoma, as the ``Warren 
                         Lindley Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WARREN LINDLEY POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1021 Pennsylvania Avenue in Hartshorne, Oklahoma, as the 
``Warren Lindley Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Warren 
Lindley Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHENMING LIU,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

,

Respondent. No. 14

- 71414

Agency No. A089

- 882

- 127

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2019 **

Before: WALLACE, FARRIS, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Zhenming Liu, a native and citizen of People’s Republic of China, petitions

for review of the Board of Im migration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. W e review for substantial evidence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 71414

the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility

determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034,

1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on inconsistencies between Liu’s testimony, asylum application, and record

evidence as to when Liu began working at the dye factory and how long he

received unemployment b enefits after he was laid off. See Shrestha , 590 F.3d at

1048 (adverse credibility determination reasonable under “the totality of

circumstances”)

. Liu’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See

Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 20 00). Thus, in the absence of credible

testimony in this case, Liu’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See

Farah v. Ashcroft , 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Liu’s CAT claim also fails because it rests on the same testimony that the

age ncy found not credible, and Liu points to no other evidence showing that it is

more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to China. See id. at 1156

- 57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         144,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,190,357
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,107,822
<DEPRECIATION>                                 414,313
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,148,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      5,110,491
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 32,500,000
<COMMON>                                       105,710
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,596,987
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,148,980
<SALES>                                     33,370,720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,370,720
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,040,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             399,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             22,931,346
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,703,785
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         27,635,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                27,635,131
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Grant of Security Interest in U.S. Trademark Registration and Applications



 Exhibit 10.9 
  
 GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST 
 IN U.S. TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS AND APPLICATIONS 
  
 WHEREAS, TieTek Technologies, Inc. (formerly known as TieTek, Inc.), a Texas corporation, with offices located at 14315 West Hardy Road, Houston, Texas 77060 (“Grantor”); and Tie Investors, LLC, a
Texas limited liability company, with offices located at 5949 Sherry Lane, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75225 (the “Secured Party”) are parties to that certain Patent Security Agreement (the “Agreement”), which is
incorporated herein by reference; 
  
 WHEREAS, said Agreement
provides, inter alia, for the granting of liens on, and security interests in, certain trademark registrations and applications to register trademarks, as more fully listed in Schedule 1 to this Grant of Security Interest (the
“Trademarks”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, it is the purpose
of this document to perfect and memorialize the security interests granted to Secured Party in the Trademarks in a form suitable for recordation in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged and subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement, Grantor hereby assigns and grants to Secured Party a security interest in each trademark registration or application to register a trademark described or referred to in
the attached Schedule 1, and a security interest in such goodwill as may exist with respect to the business symbolized by the respective marks of said registrations and applications, to secure the Obligations (as defined in the Agreement).

  

			
	TIETEK TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Texas corporation
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Henry W. Sullivan


	 Name:
	 	 Henry W. Sullivan


	 Its:
	 	 President











 SCHEDULE I 
 TO GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN U. S. 
 TRADEMARK REGISTRATIONS AND APPLICATIONS 
  

			
	 Application or Registration Number

	 	Mark


	 2467881 (Issue Date 07/10/01)
	 	TieTek
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 644

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reauthorize the establishment

of research corporations in the Veterans Health Administration, and

for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 29 (legislative day, MARCH 27), 1995

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. AKAKA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to reauthorize the

establishment of research corporations in the Veterans

Health Administration, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR RESEARCH CORPORATIONS.

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—Subsection (a) of section 7361 of

5 title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after

6 the first sentence the following new sentence: ‘‘Subject to

7 the provisions of section 7368 of this title, the Secretary

8 may exercise the authority set forth in the preceding sen9 tence on or after the date of the enactment of the Act
2

•S 644 IS

1 entitled ‘An Act to amend title 38, United States Code,

2 to reauthorize the establishment of research corporations

3 in the Veterans Health Administration, and for other pur4 poses.’ ’’.

5 (b) CLARIFICATION OF TAX-EXEMPT STATUS.—(1)

6 Subsection (b) of such section is amended by striking out

7 ‘‘section 501(c)(3) of’’.

8 (2) Section 7363(c) of such title is amended by strik9 ing out ‘‘section 501(c)(3) of’’.

10 (c) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 7368 of

11 such title is amended by striking out ‘‘December 31,

12 1992’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘December 31, 2000’’.

Æ
### RE: FE corrections

Giedrius Ambrozaitis

to: Alan Stout, John Cabaniss
06/15/2011 02:52 PM
Show Details

Alan - Thanks for sharing - I've circulated it to Alliance members and I'll g et back to you if they see anything.
Giedrius
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (248) 915-8836

From: Stout.Alan@epamail.epa.gov [Stout.Alan@epamail.epa .gov]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:19 AM
To: Giedrius Ambrozaitis; John Cabaniss Subject: FE corrections

Giedrius and John, We finalized the fuel economy labeling rule last mo nth and found that there were a few things that we need to correct. Attached is a file with a variety of adju stments to the regulations to address these concern s. These should be rather self-explanatory, but feel free to ask questions if any of this needs explanation. O ur goal is to include these changes in the upcoming final rule fo r heavy-duty greenhouse gas emissions. With the go al of finalizing all this within the next two months or s o, it would be good to give people a chance to look this over soon to make sure we get it right.

Let us know if you see anything that needs further attention.

Thanks much.

Alan

_______________

Alan Stout U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality 2000 Traverwood Dr. Ann Arbor, MI 48105
734-214-4805 734-214-4816 (fax) stout.alan@epa.gov 

### Page 1 of 1

7/8/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\astout\Local Setti ngs\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web6476.htm
Monday April 4, 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washi ngton, DC 20590

Re: Section 333 Exemption No. 15011, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 6088

- Update to Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the

Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);14 CFR Part 21;14 CFR 61.113

(a) & (b); 91.7 (a);91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b); 91.109;91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) &

(b);91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2);91.417 (a) & (b).

To whom it may concern,

This is a petition for an addendum to Section 333 Exemption No. 15011 , Regulatory

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 6088

.

In addition to th e original exemption request, I am hereby petitioning for an exemption

addendum for the following:

* News gathering purposes

This addendum would be used to gather per tinent information regarding public safety

to share through media for the purpose of informing community members of: storm

coverage and its aftermath, f ires, search and rescue efforts, train derailments, downed

power

- lines and other matters of public safety.

Joel Cordero | NBC News Boston

Photog/ Broadcast Editor

www.JoelCordero.com

joel@joelcordero.com

(508) 415

- 5935