alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gilbertson v. Gilbertson.

Divorce: inhuman treatment : insufficient evidence.

*Appeal from Emmett District Court.*— Hon. Geo. H. Carr, Judge.

Filed, February 8, 1889.

Action for a divorce. The defendant, denying the allegations of plaintiff’s petition, made his answer a cross-bill, in which he prayed for a divorce upon grounds therein alleged. Upon a trial on the merits both the petition and cross-bill were dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.

*J. G. Myerly,*for appellant.

*Soper & Allen,*for appellee.

Beck, J.

The plaintiff, as grounds of divorce, charges that defendant has been guilty of such inhuman treatment as to endanger the life of plaintiff. This charge is based mainly upon abusive and scandalous language used by defendant to and of plaintiff and in charging her with unchastity. It is alleged that defendant used violence toward a son of the parties at a time shortly after plaintiff’s confinement, which caused plaintiff to swoon and seriously affected her health. On one occasion he severely choked her. Plaintiff alleges that defendant’s acts and language have seriously affected her health, she being of a delicate and sensitive nature, and thereby her life has been endangered.

The defendant denies all the allegations of the petition charging him with inhuman treatment. The allegations of his cross-bill, in which he prays for a divorce, need not be recited as all questions arising thereon are eliminated from the case by the failure of defendant to appeal. He cannot be heard to complain of the decree of the court below.

*756In our opinion the district court rightly dismissed plaintiff’s petition. The evidence shows that defendant’s language and deportment were not always proper. But the' violence charged in the petition has not been established by the preponderance of the evidence. But plaintiff herself was not wholly without fault, and we think in view of her disposition and character, as disclosed by the evidence, her health and life were not. endangered by defendant’s acts and language.

It appears that the parties have been married more than twenty-five years and have raised a family of children, some of whom have reached years of maturity. These gave conflicting evidence as to the acts and conduct of the parties involved in the allegation of plaintiff’s petition. We reach the conclusion upon a careful consideration of the evidence that plaintiff’s life has not been endangered by defendant’s language and treatment towards her, and we think it not iirobable that it will be.

We conclude that there is no ground shown for divorcing the parties. It is needless to enter into a discussion of the evidence. It would be of profit to no one and of interest to none but the parties.

Affirmed.
|    EXHIBIT 21                                                                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT                                                                                                               |
|                                                                                                                                         |
| (1)  First Security Bank is the bank subsidiary of the Company.  The Company owns 100% of First Security Bank.           |
|                                                                                                                                         |
| (2)  Batesville Security Building Corporation is the non-bank subsidiary of the Company.   The Company owns 100% of |
|       Batesville Security Building Corporation.                                                                |
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick J. Rusnak, state and attest that:

(1) I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the Registrant).

(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge

 the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the periodic report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and

 the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                                                                  
|----- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|Name: |  | /s/    PATRICK J. RUSNAK                                         
|Title |  | President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: |  | March 4, 2010
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  registration  statement of
Scios Inc.,  on Form S-8 (File No.  333-56269)  of our report dated  January 30,
1999 on our audits of the  consolidated  financial  statements of Scios Inc. and
its  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the years ended December
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in the Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K.




                                                     PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




San Jose, California
March 25, 1999



                                 EXHIBIT 23.1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

November 18, 2005

 

In connection with the Large Scale Biology CorporationQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Ronald J. Artale, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(1)          the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          that informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of Large Scale Biology Corporation for thefiscal period covered by the Report.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Ronald J. Artale                    |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Ronald J. Artale                        |
|   |   | Senior Vice President,  Chief Operating |
|   |   | Officer and Chief  Financial Officer    |
|   |   | Large Scale Biology  Corporation        |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996 CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED AS ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       6,045,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,061,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,061,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          373,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,684,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,061,000
<SALES>                                     16,878,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,878,000
<CGS>                                       15,569,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,043,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               890,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                64,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             509,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,055,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,055,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,055,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.61)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED AS PART OF ITS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
PERIOD DECEMBER 31, 1995
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-10-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         525,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               802,601
<PP&E>                                       5,425,149
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,410,328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,817,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,817,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,817,422
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,055,727
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  334,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   720,755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of EP MedSystems, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, based on his knowledge, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 31, 2006



/s/ Matthew C. HillMatthew C. HillChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
#### Say ABNEY et al., Trustees of the New Dripping Springs Union Church, Appellants, v. Elmo ROBINS et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 29, 1959.

*822Strange & Pendleton, Stanton, for appellants.

John W. Walker, Irvine, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Motion by Say Abney and others for an appeal from a judgment of the Estill Circuit Court, which dismissed their complaint in which they had sought to quiet the title to a church building and lot, valued at less than $2,500.

We think that under the evidence the court was warranted in concluding that the appellants were not present trustees of the church and therefore had no rightful claim of title to the church property upon which to base an action to quiet title.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment stands affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In
connection with the Annual Report of Security Capital Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Connie
Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:           March
14, 2008








/s/ Connie
Hawkins


Connie
Hawkins


Chief
Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

AmericanWest Bancorporation 

We consent to incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement numbers 333-132811, 333-101040, 333-95989, 333-72834, 333-65628, 333-65630, and 333-58511, on Forms S-8 of AmericanWest Bancorporation of our report dated March 31, 2009, relating to the consolidated statements offinancial condition of AmericanWest Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the three yearsended December 31, 2008, which report is included in this annual report on Form 10-K of AmericanWest Bancorporation for the year ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/ Moss Adams LLP 

Spokane, Washington 

March 31, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7402-7403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Minority Health and 
Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; Interventions to Address 
HIV-Related Comorbidities among

[[Page 7403]]

Highly Affected Populations Experiencing Health Disparities.
    Date: March 21, 2024.
    Time: 11:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIMHD DEM II, Suite 800, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ivan K. Navarro, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Extramural Research Administration, National 
Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National 
Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-827-2061, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#224b54434c0c4c43544350504d624c4b4a0c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94fde2f5fabafaf5e2f5e6e6fbd4fafdfcbaf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 30, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-02087 Filed 2-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Bancsi , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5917.]

C LEVELAND M ETROPOLITAN B AR A SSOCIATION v . B ANCSI . [Cite as Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Bancsi , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5917.] (No. 2014-0192

— Submitted September 16, 2016

— Decided September 22, 2016.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by responden t, Joseph Bancsi, Attorney Registration No. 0025450, last known business addre ss in Fairview Park, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 4, 2014, wherein the court, pursuant to former Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a pe riod of two years, with the last 18 months stayed on conditions, finds that re spondent has substan tially complied with that order and with the provi sions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this cour t that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that respondent is placed on probation for a period of two years in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21) and consistent with the opinion re ndered herein on December 4, 2014. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this
order relator shall file with the clerk of th is court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(A)(3). It is further ordered that at the end of respondent ’s probationary peri od, relator shall file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation. {¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period respondent may apply for te rmination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 V(21). It is further ordered that responden t’s probation shall not be terminated until (1) respondent files an application for te rmination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(21)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, a nd (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated. {¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). {¶ 7} For earlier case, see Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Bancsi , 141 Ohio St.3d 457, 2014-Ohio-5255, 25 N.E.3d 1018.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

________________________
**EXHIBIT 99.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Paul F. Walsh, certify that:
         1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of eFundsCorporation;
         2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;
         3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;   Date: November 29, 2002 /s/ Paul F. WalshBy: Paul F. WalshIts: Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
# Operating Facilities by Technology in the State of

**Wyoming** This table provides data of all currently tracked renewable energy facilities in the state. Data is derived from theRenewable Plant Information System, developed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Hydro Photovoltaic Wind **Technology Location**  **Owner Fuel**  **Type Plant Name**  **Capacity (kW)**  Hydro ALCOVA BUREAU OF RECLAMATION WaterALCOVA 36,000.0 Hydro THERMOPOLISBUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water BOYSEN 15,000.0 Hydro BUFFALO BUFFALO, CITY OF (WY) Water BUFFALO 245.0 Hydro CODY BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water BUFFALO BILL 18,000.0 Hydro KEMMERER BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water FONTENELLE 10,000.0 Hydro ALCOVA BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water FREMONT CANYON 66,800.0 Hydro SHOSHONE IRRIGATION DISTRICT Water GARLAND CANAL 2,610.0 Hydro GLENDO BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water GLENDO 38,000.0 Hydro GUERNSEY BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water GUERNSEY 6,400.0 Hydro CODY BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water HEART MOUNTAIN 5,000.0 Hydro GOODMAN, CHARLES Water KINKY CREEK 12.0 Hydro SINCLAIR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water KORTES 36,000.0 Hydro MORTON BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water PILOT BUTTE 1,600.0 Hydro PINEDALE PINEDALE POWER & LIGHT CO.Water PINEDALE 100.0 Hydro SINCLAIR BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water SEMINOE 51,000.0 Hydro CODY BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water SHOSHONE 3,000.0 Hydro BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Water SPIRIT MOUNTAIN 4,500.0 Hydro BEDFORD LOWER VALLEY POWER & LIGHT INC Water STRAWBERRY CREEK 1,500.0 Hydro LOWER VALLEY POWER & LIGHT INC Water SWIFT CREEK 800.0 Hydro PacifiCorp WaterVIVA NAUGHTON 750.0 PhotovoltaicLaramie University Solar Univ Wyoming 1 10.0 PhotovoltaicLaramie University Solar Univ Wyoming 2 1.0 PhotovoltaicLaramie University Solar Univ Wyoming Parking 35.0 Wind RAWLINS Cinergy Global Power Wind FOOT CREEK IV 16,800.0 Wind ARLINGTON PACIFICORP/EUGENE WATER &Wind FOOTE CREEK I 41,400.0ELECTRIC BOARD Wind Cinergy Global Power Wind FOOTE CREEK II 1,800.0 Wind Cinergy Global Power Wind FOOTE CREEK III 24,750.0

Wind Medicine BowPLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY Wind Medicine Bow I 3,300.0

Wind Medicine BowPLATTE RIVER POWER AUTHORITY Wind Medicine Bow II 1,320.0 Wind Arlington Shell Renewables Wind Rock River I 50,000.0 Wind Saratoga TERRA MOYA AQUA/GLOBAL WIND ENERGY SYSTEMS Wind Simpson Ridge 10,000.0 Total # 31 Total Capacity 446,733.0
#### Pantall, Appellant, *v.*The Shriver Allison Co., Appellee.

(No. 27460

Decided March 15, 1939.)

*Mr. John Ruff alo*and *Mr. I. Freeman,*for appellant.

*Mr. David C. Haynes*and *Mr. William E. Pfau,*for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.