7686 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2024 / Notices 

16See Order at 44176 (showing the dumping 

margin computed for all other producers/exporters 

as 24.14 percent); and Notice of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip 

from India, 67 FR 34899, 34901 (May 16, 2002) 

(showing an adjustment of 18.43 percent for export 

subsidies found in the companion countervailing 

duty investigation). The cash deposit rate for all 

other exporters is the net of these figures (i.e., 5.71 

percent). 

1See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, 

Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, 

South Africa, Spain, Taiwan and the Republic of 

Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 22139 

(April 27, 2021) (CAAS AD Germany Order or 

Order). 

2See Kodak’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Expedited 

Changed Circumstances Review,’’ dated May 9, 

2023 (CCR Request); see also Kodak’s Letter, 

‘‘Supplemental Questionnaire Response,’’ dated 

June 9, 2023 (Kodak’s Supplemental Questionnaire 

Response). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Proposed Exclusion 

Language,’’ dated July 24, 2023. 

4See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Germany: Notice of Initiation of Changed 

Circumstances Review, and Consideration of 

Revocation, in Part, of the Antidumping Duty 

Order, 88 FR 49446 (July 31, 2023) (Initiation 

Notice). 

5 Id., 88 FR at 49448. 

6See Aluminum Association’s Letter, 

‘‘Petitioners’ Response to Department’s Initiation 

Notice,’’ dated August 30, 2023 (Aluminum 

Association’s Comments) and Kodak’s Letter, 

‘‘Comments on Changed Circumstances Review,’’ 

dated August 30, 2023 (Kodak’s Comments). 

7See Kodak’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Comments on 

Changed Circumstances Review,’’ dated September 

6, 2023. 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date, as provided for by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rate for SRF, Jindal, and 

Polyplex will be zero, the rate 

established in the final results of this 

review; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not covered in 

this review, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this or any previous review or in the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) if neither the 

exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm 

covered in this or any previous review 

or the LTFV investigation, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the allothers rate of 5.71 percent, which is the 

all-others rate established by Commerce 

in the LTFV investigation.16 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of ADs 

prior to liquidation of the relevant 

entries during this review period. 

Failure to comply with this requirement 

could result in the Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of ADs 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double ADs. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These results are being issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: January 29, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02181 Filed 2–2–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–428–849] 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From 

Germany: Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review, and 

Intent To Revoke the Antidumping 

Duty Order, in Part 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

intends to revoke, in part, the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

common alloy aluminum sheet (CAAS) 

from Germany with respect to certain 

lithographic-grade aluminum sheet. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable February 5, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Trejo, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4390. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 27, 2021, Commerce 

published the AD order on common 

alloy aluminum sheet from Germany.1

On May 9, 2023, Eastman Kodak 

Company (Kodak), a U.S. importer of 

subject merchandise, requested that 

Commerce conduct a changed 

circumstances review (CCR), and 

revoke, in part, the CAAS AD Germany 

Order with respect to certain 

lithographic-grade aluminum sheet 

pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.216(b).2 On July 24, 

2023, Commerce issued proposed 

partial revocation language for the scope 

in which it omitted references to enduse certificates which had been 

included by Kodak and solicited 

interested parties comments on that 

language.3 On July 31, 2023, Commerce 

initiated the requested CCR.4 In the 

Initiation Notice, Commerce invited 

interested parties to provide comments 

and/or factual information regarding the 

CCR, including comments on industry 

support and the proposed partial 

revocation language.5 On August 30, 

2023, the Aluminum Association 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet Trade 

Enforcement Working Group and its 

individual members (Aluminum 

Association) and Kodak commented on 

the CCR.6 On September 6, 2023, Kodak 

responded to the Aluminum 

Association’s comments.7

Scope of the CAAS AD Germany Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are common alloy aluminum sheet, 

which is a flat-rolled aluminum product 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2024 / Notices 7687 

8See section 782(h) of the Act; and 19 CFR 

351.222(g). 

9See, e.g., Honey from Argentina; Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances 

Reviews; Preliminary Intent to Revoke Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 67790, 

67791 (November 14, 2012), unchanged in Honey 

from Argentina; Final Results of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances 

Reviews; Revocation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 77029 

(December 31, 2012). 

10See Kodak’s Supplemental Questionnaire 

Response at 1 and Exhibit 1; see also Aluminum 

Association’s Comments at 2 and Attachment 1. 

11See Raw Flexible Magnets from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing 

Duty Determination, 73 FR 39667 (July 10, 2008), 

Continued 

having a thickness of 6.3 mm or less, but 

greater than 0.2 mm, in coils or cut-tolength, regardless of width. Common 

alloy sheet within the scope of the 

Order includes both not clad aluminum 

sheet, as well as multi-alloy, clad 

aluminum sheet. With respect to not 

clad aluminum sheet, common alloy 

sheet is manufactured from a 1XXX-, 

3XXX-, or 5XXX-series alloy as 

designated by the Aluminum 

Association. With respect to multi-alloy, 

clad aluminum sheet, common alloy 

sheet is produced from a 3XXX-series 

core, to which cladding layers are 

applied to either one or both sides of the 

core. The use of a proprietary alloy or 

non-proprietary alloy that is not 

specifically registered by the Aluminum 

Association as a discrete 1XXX-, 

3XXX-, or 5XXX-series alloy, but that 

otherwise has a chemistry that is 

consistent with these designations, does 

not remove an otherwise in-scope 

product from the scope. 

Common alloy sheet may be made to 

ASTM specification B209–14 but can 

also be made to other specifications. 

Regardless of specification, however, all 

common alloy sheet meeting the scope 

description is included in the scope. 

Subject merchandise includes common 

alloy sheet that has been further 

processed in a third country, including 

but not limited to annealing, tempering, 

painting, varnishing, trimming, cutting, 

punching, and/or slitting, or any other 

processing that would not otherwise 

remove the merchandise from the scope 

of the order if performed in the country 

of manufacture of the common alloy 

sheet. 

Excluded from the scope of the Order 

is aluminum can stock, which is 

suitable for use in the manufacture of 

aluminum beverage cans, lids of such 

cans, or tabs used to open such cans. 

Aluminum can stock is produced to 

gauges that range from 0.200 mm to 

0.292 mm, and has an H–19, H–41, H– 

48, H–39, or H–391 temper. In addition, 

aluminum can stock has a lubricant 

applied to the flat surfaces of the can 

stock to facilitate its movement through 

machines used in the manufacture of 

beverage cans. Aluminum can stock is 

properly classified under Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) subheadings 7606.12.3045 and 

7606.12.3055. 

Where the nominal and actual 

measurements vary, a product is within 

the scope if application of either the 

nominal or actual measurement would 

place it within the scope based on the 

definitions set for the above. 

Common alloy sheet is currently 

classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 

7606.11.3060, 7606.11.6000, 

7606.12.3096, 7606.12.6000, 

7606.91.3095, 7606.91.6095, 

7606.92.3035, and 7606.92.6095. 

Further, merchandise that falls within 

the scope of the Order may also be 

entered into the United States under 

HTSUS subheadings 7606.11.3030, 

7606.12.3015, 7606.12.3025, 

7606.12.3035, 7606.12.3091, 

7606.91.3055, 7606.91.6055, 

7606.92.3025, 7606.92.6055, 

7607.11.9090. Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope of the 

Order is dispositive. 

Preliminary Results of CCR and Intent 

To Revoke the CAAS AD Germany 

Order, in Part 

Pursuant to section 751(d)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.222(g), Commerce 

may revoke an order, in whole or in 

part, based on a review under section 

751(b) of the Act (i.e., a CCR). Section 

751(b)(1) of the Act requires a CCR to be 

conducted upon receipt of a request 

which shows changed circumstances 

sufficient to warrant a review. Section 

782(h)(2) of the Act gives Commerce the 

authority to revoke an order if producers 

accounting for substantially all of the 

production of the domestic like product 

have expressed a lack of interest in the 

order. Section 351.222(g) of Commerce’s 

regulations provides that Commerce 

will conduct a CCR under 19 CFR 

351.216, and may revoke an order (in 

whole or in part), if it concludes that: (i) 

producers accounting for substantially 

all of the production of the domestic 

like product to which the order pertains 

have expressed a lack of interest in the 

relief provided by the order, in whole or 

in part; or (ii) if other changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant 

revocation exist. Thus, both the Act and 

Commerce’s regulations require that 

‘‘substantially all’’ domestic producers 

express a lack of interest in the order for 

Commerce to revoke the order, in whole 

or in part.8 Commerce has interpreted 

‘‘substantially all’’ to mean producers 

accounting for at least 85 percent of the 

total U.S. production of the domestic 

like product covered by the order.9

Information on the record indicates 

that the Aluminum Association and its 

individual members, as well as Kaiser 

Aluminum Corporation and Jupiter 

Aluminum Corporation—two U.S. 

producers of CAAS that are not part of 

the Aluminum Association— 

(collectively Domestic Producers), do 

not oppose Kodak’s exclusion request. 

Moreover, record information indicates 

that in 2022 the Domestic Producers 

accounted for at least 85 percent of the 

total U.S. production of the domestic 

like product covered by the Order.10

In light of the above evidence and in 

the absence of any interested party 

comments claiming that the Domestic 

Producers do not account for 

substantially all of the production of the 

domestic like product to which the 

CAAS AD Germany Order pertains, we 

preliminarily determine that producers 

accounting for substantially all of the 

production of the domestic like product 

to which the CAAS AD Germany Order 

pertains lack interest in the relief 

provided by the CAAS AD Germany 

Order with respect to the lithographicgrade aluminum sheet identified by 

Kodak. Thus, we preliminarily 

determine that changed circumstances 

warrant revocation of the CAAS AD 

Germany Order, in part, with respect to 

the lithographic-grade aluminum sheet 

identified by Kodak. 

Accordingly, we are notifying the 

public of our intent to revoke the CAAS 

AD Germany Order, in part, with 

respect to the following lithographicgrade aluminum sheet and include the 

following exclusion language in the 

scope of the CAAS AD Germany Order: 

Also excluded from the scope of the 

Order is lithographic-grade aluminum 

sheet that meets the following criteria: 

(i) a Copper (Cu) content of no more 

than 0.01 percent, a Zinc (Zn) content 

of ≤0.05%, a Silicon (Si) content of 

0.05%–0.20% and an Iron (Fe) content 

of 0.30%–0.50%; (ii) a thickness 

between 0.267 mm–0.3705 mm, (iii) a 

width of 500 mm–1650 mm, (iv) a 

maximum wave height of no more than 

3.0 mm, (v) a tensile strength of 130 

MPa or more (after baking), and (vi) a 

surface roughness less than or equal to 

Ra 0.26 mm. 

We have not included the language 

regarding end-use certifications 

proposed by Kodak and supported by 

the Aluminum Association in the above 

exclusion language. Commerce’s general 

practice is not to use end-use language 

in scopes 11 or end-use certifications 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
7688 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2024 / Notices 

and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (IDM) at ‘‘Scope Comments’’ (‘‘{a}s 

an initial matter, the Department does not generally 

define subject merchandise by end-use 

application.’’). 

12See Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires 

from the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value and Partial Affirmative Determination of 

Critical Circumstances, 73 FR 40485 (July 15, 2008), 

and accompanying IDM at Comment 19. 

13 Id. 

14 Id. (‘‘{a}lthough the Department has 

implemented such certification programs {(i.e., enduse certification programs)} in the past, we 

generally do so only in limited circumstances.’’). 

15 Id.; see also Carbon and Alloy Seamless 

Standard, Line and Pressure Pipe (Under 41⁄2

Inches) from Japan and Romania: Final Results of 

the Expedited Fourth Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 88 FR 3970 (January 23, 

2023), and accompanying IDM at ‘‘Scope of the 

Orders’’ (‘‘{w}ith regard to the excluded products 

listed above, {Commerce} will not instruct CBP to 

require end-use certification until such time as {the 

petitioner} or other interested parties provide to 

{Commerce} a reasonable basis to believe or suspect 

that the products are being used in a covered 

application.’’). 

16See CCR Request at 5. 

17See Kodak’s Comments at 6. 

18See CCR Request at 14–15. 

19See e.g., Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results 

of Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances 

Review and Revocation, In Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 

12, 2011); Stainless Steel Bar from the United 

Kingdom: Notice of Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review and Revocation of Order, in 

Part, 72 FR 65706 (November 23, 2007); Notice of 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review and Revocation of Order In 

Part: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat 

Products from Germany, 71 FR 66163 (November 

13, 2006); Notice of Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Changed Circumstances Reviews and 

Revocation of Orders in Part: Certain CorrosionResistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Canada 

and Germany, 71 FR 14498 (March 22, 2006); 

Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Changed Circumstances Review, and Determination 

to Revoke Order in Part: Certain Cased Pencils from 

the People’s Republic of China, 68 FR 62428 

(November 4, 2003). 

20See section 751(d)(3) of the Act; Itochu 

Building Products v. United States, Slip Op. 14–37 

at 12 (CIT April 8, 2014) (Itochu) (‘‘The statutory 

provision, as discussed above, provides Commerce 

with discretion in the selection of the effective date 

for a partial revocation following a changed 

circumstances review, but that discretion may not 

be exercised arbitrarily so as to decide the question 

presented without considering the relevant and 

competing considerations.’’). 

21See, e.g., Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire 

Rod from Brazil, Canada, Indonesia, Mexico, 

Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine: Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 68 FR 

64079 (November 12, 2003); Stainless Steel Hollow 

Products from Sweden; Termination of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, and Revocation In Part 

of Antidumping Duty Order, 60 FR 42529 (August 

16, 1995). 

22See Steel Wire Garment Hangers from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review, and Revocation in 

Part of Antidumping Duty Order, 74 FR 50956 

(October 2, 2009); Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 

and Determination To Revoke Order in Part: Certain 

Cased Pencils from the People’s Republic of China, 

71 FR 13352 (March 15, 2006); Stainless Steel Sheet 

and Strip in Coils from Japan: Final Results of 

Changed Circumstance Antidumping Duty Review, 

and Determination To Revoke Order in Part, 65 FR 

77578 (December 12, 2000). 

23See Large Newspaper Printing Presses and 

Components Thereof, Whether Assembled or 

Unassembled, from Japan: Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Intent To Revoke Antidumping Duty 

Order, In Part, 64 FR 72315 (December 27, 1999). 

24See Itochu, Slip Op. 14–37 at 3. 

25See CCR Request at 14–15. 

26See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

38021, 38023 (June 12, 2023). 

27Commerce issued the final results of the 

administrative review of the CAAS AD Germany 

Order covering the period October 15, 2020 through 

March 31, 2022 on November 3, 2023. See Common 

Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Germany: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2022, 88 FR 77556 (November 13, 2023). Commerce 

issued the automatic liquidation instruction for the 

administrative review of the CAAS AD Germany 

Order covering the period April 1, 2022 through 

March 31, 2023 on July 21, 2023. See CBP Message 

3202416, ‘‘Automatic Liquidation Instructions,’’ 

dated July 21, 2023. 

because such certifications ‘‘are difficult 

to administer and to enforce’’ 12 and 

‘‘depend on a generally un-verifiable 

supposition about the end-use of 

individual sales, and would be subject 

to manipulation.’’ 13 While Commerce 

has implemented end-use certifications 

in some proceedings, it does so under 

limited circumstances 14 including 

where ‘‘evidence had been proffered 

that would provide a reasonable basis to 

believe or suspect that substitution was 

occurring, and then would only apply 

the program {(i.e., end-use certification 

program)} to products for which such 

evidence existed.’’ 15 No such evidence 

has been provided in this review. 

Moreover, Kodak stated that 

‘‘{l}ithographic-grade aluminum sheet 

is a niche product that is made to 

stringent specifications and is 

distinguishable from other aluminum 

sheet products’’ 16 and the physical and 

chemical characteristics in the proposed 

scope exclusion language were 

‘‘narrowly tailored to cover only 

lithographic-grade aluminum sheet.’’ 17

Neither Kodak, nor the Aluminum 

Association, has explained why the 

physical and chemical characteristics of 

lithographic-grade aluminum sheet 

included in the above scope exclusion 

do not sufficiently distinguish the 

product from subject CAAS. 

Application of Revocation 

Kodak requested retroactive 

application of this partial revocation 

starting October 15, 2020, the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the preliminary determination in the 

underlying investigation and the date of 

institution of provisional measures.18

Section 751(d)(3) of the Act provides 

that ‘‘{a} determination under this 

section to revoke an order . . . shall 

apply with respect to unliquidated 

entries of the subject merchandise 

which are entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date determined by the 

administering authority.’’ Commerce’s 

general practice is to instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

and/or countervailing duties, and to 

refund any estimated antidumping and/ 

or countervailing duties, on all 

unliquidated entries of the merchandise 

covered by a revocation that are not 

covered by the final results of an 

administrative review or automatic 

liquidation instruction.19 However, 

Commerce has exercised its discretion 

and deviated from this general practice 

if the particular facts of a case have 

implications for the effective date of the 

partial revocation selected by 

Commerce.20 Specifically, when 

selecting the effective date for partial 

revocation, Commerce has considered 

factors such as the effective date 

proposed by the petitioner (and/or the 

effective date agreed to by all parties),21

the existence of unliquidated entries 

dating back to the requested effective 

date,22 whether an interested party 

requested the effective date of the 

revocation,23 and whether the requested 

effective date creates potential 

administrability issues (e.g., the 

products covered by the partial 

revocation are in the sales database used 

in the dumping margin calculations for 

a completed administrative review with 

a period of review that overlaps with the 

date requested).24

The Domestic Producers have not 

proposed an effective date or 

specifically agreed to the effective date 

proposed by Kodak, Kodak has not 

provided any evidence of unliquidated 

entries dating back to the requested 

effective date, and the German producer 

from which Kodak obtains the 

lithographic-grade aluminum sheet, 

Speira GmbH,25 is currently under 

review in the administrative review of 

the CAAS AD Germany Order covering 

the period April 1, 2022 through March 

31, 2023.26 Given the forgoing, we 

preliminarily determine to follow 

Commerce’s general practice and apply 

the partial revocation to all unliquidated 

entries of the merchandise covered by 

this revocation that are not covered by 

the final results of an administrative 

review or automatic liquidation 

instruction (i.e., unliquidated entries on 

or after April 1, 2023).27


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2024 / Notices 7689 

28See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Final Service Rule). 

29See, generally, 19 CFR 351.303. 

30See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

31We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

32See APO and Final Service Rule. 33See 19 CFR 351.216(e). 

Public Comment 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results of 

review in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(ii). Written comments may 

be submitted no later than 14 days after 

the date of publication of these 

preliminary results of review in the 

Federal Register. Rebuttal comments, 

limited to issues raised in written 

comments, may be filed no later than 

five days after the due date for 

comments.28 All submissions must be 

filed electronically using Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS).29

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. An 

electronically filed document must be 

successfully received in its entirety by 

ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the 

deadlines set forth in this notice. 

Interested parties who submit case or 

rebuttal briefs must submit: (1) a table 

of contents listing each issue discussed 

in the brief; and (2) a table of 

authorities.30 As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.31 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

review. We request that interested 

parties include footnotes for relevant 

citations in the executive summary of 

each issue. Note that Commerce has 

amended certain of its requirements 

pertaining to the service of documents 

in 19 CFR 351.303(f).32

Final Results of the CCR 

Commerce will issue the final results 

of this CCR, which will include its 

analysis of any written comments, no 

later than 270 days after the date on 

which this review was initiated.33 If, in 

the final results of this review, 

Commerce continues to determine that 

changed circumstances warrant the 

revocation of the CAAS AD Germany 

Order, in part, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate without regard to antidumping 

duties, and to refund any estimated 

antidumping duties deposited on, all 

unliquidated entries of the merchandise 

covered by the revocation that are not 

covered by the final results of an 

administrative review or an automatic 

liquidation instruction to CBP. The 

current requirement for cash deposits of 

estimated antidumping duties on all 

entries of subject merchandise will 

continue unless it is modified pursuant 

to the final results of this CCR. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results of changed 

circumstances review and this notice 

are published in accordance with 

sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.216, 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3), and 19 CFR 351.222. 

Dated: January 30, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02231 Filed 2–2–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XD590] 

Fisheries of the Gulf of Mexico and 

South Atlantic; Southeast Data, 

Assessment, and Review (SEDAR); 

Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of SEDAR 79 Assessment 

Webinar I for Gulf of Mexico and South 

Atlantic Mutton Snapper. 

SUMMARY: The SEDAR 79 assessment 

process of Gulf of Mexico and South 

Atlantic mutton snapper will consist of 

a Data Workshop, and a series of 

assessment webinars, and a Review 

Workshop. See SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

DATES: The SEDAR 79 Assessment 

webinar I will be held February 23, 

2024, from 1 p.m. until 4 p.m., eastern 

time. The established times may be 

adjusted as necessary to accommodate 

the timely completion of discussion 

relevant to the assessment process. Such 

adjustments may result in the meeting 

being extended from or completed prior 

to the time established by this notice. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held 

via webinar. The webinar is open to 

members of the public. Those interested 

in participating should contact Julie A. 

Neer at SEDAR (see FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT) to request an 

invitation providing webinar access 

information. Please request webinar 

invitations at least 24 hours in advance 

of each webinar. 

SEDAR address: 4055 Faber Place 

Drive, Suite 201, North Charleston, SC 

29405. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julie 

A. Neer, SEDAR Coordinator; (843) 571– 

4366; email: Julie.neer@safmc.net. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf 

of Mexico, South Atlantic, and 

Caribbean Fishery Management 

Councils, in conjunction with NOAA 

Fisheries and the Atlantic and Gulf 

States Marine Fisheries Commissions 

have implemented the Southeast Data, 

Assessment and Review (SEDAR) 

process, a multi-step method for 

determining the status of fish stocks in 

the Southeast Region. SEDAR is a multistep process including: (1) Data 

Workshop, (2) a series of assessment 

webinars, and (3) A Review Workshop. 

The product of the Data Workshop is a 

report that compiles and evaluates 

potential datasets and recommends 

which datasets are appropriate for 

assessment analyses. The assessment 

webinars produce a report that describes 

the fisheries, evaluates the status of the 

stock, estimates biological benchmarks, 

projects future population conditions, 

and recommends research and 

monitoring needs. The product of the 

Review Workshop is an Assessment 

Summary documenting panel opinions 

regarding the strengths and weaknesses 

of the stock assessment and input data. 

Participants for SEDAR Workshops are 

appointed by the Gulf of Mexico, South 

Atlantic, and Caribbean Fishery 

Management Councils and NOAA 

Fisheries Southeast Regional Office, 

HMS Management Division, and 

Southeast Fisheries Science Center. 

Participants include data collectors and 

database managers; stock assessment 

scientists, biologists, and researchers; 

constituency representatives including 

fishermen, environmentalists, and 

NGO’s; International experts; and staff 

of Councils, Commissions, and State 

and Federal agencies. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1