alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES
THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,262
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,650
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,631
<PP&E>                                          48,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,782
<BONDS>                                          4,190
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,415
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,637
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,105
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,358<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,519<F2>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36<F2>
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS PROFORMA PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES RELATING TO CHANGE IN INCOME TAX
STATUS FROM S CORPORATION TO C CORPORATION.  SEE NOTES 2 AND 10 OF THE NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<F2>AMOUNTS ARE PRESENTED ON A PROFORMA BASIS ASSUMING CONVERSION FROM AN S
CORPORATION INCOME TAX STATUS TO A C CORPORATION.  SEE NOTES 2 AND 10 OF THE
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Holding Investments, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbane-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: April 6, 2006
                                              /s/ William Barber
                                              ------------------
                                              William Barber
                                              President, Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7695

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

RICKY MCKINLEY INGRAM, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:06-cr-00460-JAB-1) 

Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 4, 2009 

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Ricky McKinley Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. David Paul Folmar, 

Jr., Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Ricky McKinley Ingram seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 

2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will 

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ingram has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 45 ) IV-C-1 1 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:53 AM Sheet 45of 2324**4* P__ 2 

# R'-ft7-_t i
* ^ _.%(«* ^ 1 UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D. C 2046 0


### DE C 2 4 I98 T OFFIC EO F AI RAN D RADIATION

Honorabl e WilliamS . Broomfiel d U.S . Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D C 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Broomfield : Thank yo u fo r passing along th e comment s o f Mr . Norma n W . Boye r concerning EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refueling emissio n controls . B e assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l be considere d a s w e prepar e ou r Fina l Rule . W e wil l als o b e placing the

mi n th e publi c docke t fo r the Rul e (Docke t No . A-87-11) . Thank yo u agai n fo r you r concer n i n thi s matter . Sincerel yyours , 

### ORIGINA L SIGNE D B Y DONAL D E . ZING Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : Docke t A-87-1 1P. 3

1 <i-_LIVLl , ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N

AGENC Y 

### JA N 

### I I 198

8
EX-10.5(D)



 Exhibit 10.5(d) 

June 1, 2016 
 Campbell & Company, L.P. 

2850 Quarry Lake Drive 
 Baltimore, MD 21209 

Attn: Mr. Tom Lloyd 
  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Lloyd: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2017 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	 Potomac Futures Fund L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 CMF Campbell Master Fund L.P. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036 or fax to 866-428-9026. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-296-6808 or contact Jack Yuen at 212-296-1320. 

Very truly yours, 
 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 

 

			
	By:  	 	 /s/ Patrick T. Egan

		 	 Patrick T. Egan

President and Director


 CAMPBELL & COMPANY, LP. 

By:             /s/ Thomas P. Lloyd         /s/ Gregory
T. Donovan 
 Print Name: Thomas P. Lloyd             Gregory T. Donovan  

PE/Kg
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03-20-00064-CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03-20-00065-CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03-20-00066-CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND TRIANA

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10094

Summary Calendar

JIMMIE LEE WALTON

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DALLAS COUNTY SHERIFF LUPE VALDEZ

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:08-CV-2166

Before GARZA, CLEMENT and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jimmie Lee Walton, Texas prisoner # 1482003, moves to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) to appeal the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as

frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). The district court

denied Walton leave to proceed IFP on appeal, certifying that the appeal is not

taken in good faith. By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Walton is challenging

that certification. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). Our

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 13, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 09-10094

2

inquiry into Walton’s good faith “is limited to whether the appeal involves legal

points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Because neither Walton’s IFP motion nor his brief in support of his IFP

motion address the reasons for the district court’s certification decision or the

basis of the district court’s dismissal, it is the same as if he had not appealed the

judgment. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744,

748 (5th Cir. 1987); Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202. Walton has not demonstrated that

he will raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Howard, 707 F.2d at 219-20.

Accordingly, Walton’s motion to proceed IFP is denied. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at

202 n.24. Because his appeal is frivolous, see Howard, 707 F.2d at 219-20, his

appeal is dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

The district court’s dismissal of Walton’s § 1983 complaint and the

dismissal of this appeal as frivolous count as two strikes for purposes of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir.

1996). We caution Walton that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not

proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or

detained in any facility unless he “is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury.” § 1915(g).

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.
#### Seferino V. TREVINO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28702.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 12, 1956.

*536No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, three days in jail and a fine of $75.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Page 1 of 1

PBPK Package Supporting NMP Risk Assessment

Name of folder or file Description

NMP_human_9-16-13.zip This zip file contains the files needed to run the human PBPK model, including the 

exposure data and plots.

NMP_rat_9-16-2013.zip This zip file contains the files needed to run the rat PBPK model, including the 

exposure data and plots.

NMP PBPK Model Quality Assurance Assessment Report

n-Methylpyrrolidone PBPK QA Report 091613 V3.docx

This Word document contains the model code evaluation that EPA conducted to the 

revised PBPK model that Dr. Torka Poet submitted to the Agency in March 2013.

Residential_PBPK results and risk estimates_091513

This Excel spreadsheet contains the AUC and Cmax values for the NMP’s residential 

scenarios examined in the risk assessment. In addition, it contains information about 

the benchmark dose metrics and toxic endpoints used in the assessment and 

preliminary risk estimates (Margin of Exposures or MOEs).

Workplace_PBPK results and risk estimates_091213

This Excel spreadsheet contains the AUC and Cmax values for the NMP’s workplace 

scenarios examined in the risk assessment. In addition, it contains information about 

the benchmark dose metrics and toxic endpoints used in the assessment and 

preliminary risk estimates (Margin of Exposures or MOEs).

NMP dose-response analysis_091613 v3.docx This files documents the dose-response analysis for NMP, particularly the pooled 

analysis using Saillenfait et al.(2003) and Becci et al.. 1982.

BMC calculations

BMD Analysis_Becci 1982_Cmax_090513.docx

BMD Analysis_Pooled Becci Saillenfait data_Cmax_090513.docx

BMD Analysis_Saillenfait 2003_AUC_091513.docx

BMD Analysis_Saillenfait 2003_Cmax_091513.docx

BMD calculations using the data from Becci et al. 1982 and Saillenfait et al. 2003.

Becci et al. 1982.pdf

Paper entitled “Teratogenicity study of N-methylpyrrolidone after dermal application 

to Sprague-Dawley rats”; Fundamental and Applied Toxicology (1982) 2: 73-76 

(copyrighted paper)

Saillenfait et al. 2003.pdf

Paper entitled “Developmental toxicity of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone in rats following 

inhalation exposure”; Food and Chemical Toxicology (2003) 41: 583-588 (copyrighted 

paper)

Ligocka et al. 2003.pdf

Paper entitled “Contribution of CYP2E1 to N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone metabolism”; Arch 

Toxicol (2003) 77: 261–266 (copyrighted paper)

Paper supports retaining a 10X factor for inter-individual differences
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the Company), I, Mel F. Wesley, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  |                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 11, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    MEL F. WESLEY
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Mel F. Wesley                             
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                      |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
### Kruger , Bret t(OST ) Subject : RE : Kingfishe rapplicatio n fo rexemptio n ^P'^TA^in' r



### , ' ^'/rnAflGN S From : Magali , Nichola s rmailto:Nicholas.Maqali@clvdeco.us l ... . Sent : Tuesday , Marc h 01 , 201 1 9:2 7 A M ' ' ' "- ^ ': •3 2 To : Kruger , Bret t(OST ) Cc : Carlsen , Christophe r Subject : RE : Kingfishe rapplicatio n fo rexemptio n Mr . Kruger , I hav e obtaine d clarificatio n regardin g th e ownershi p ofWatso n Limite d a s se tfort h below . Than k yo u fo ryo u patienc e wit h respec tt o thi s remainin g issue . W e hav e confirme d tha tWatso n Limite d i s owne d 10 0 percen tb yContinenta l Administratio n Services , whic h i s i n incorporate d i n Nevi s Islands . Continenta l Administratio n Service s Limite d i s i n tur n owne d 10 0 percen tb yContinenta l Administratio n Service s BV I Limited , a compan yincorporate d i n th e Britis h Virgi n Islands . Continenta l Administratio n Service s BV I Limite d is i n tur n owne d b yMr . Ja yVallab h an d Ms . Susann e Vallabh , wh o eac h 5 0 percen tofth e company . Ja yVallab h an d Susann e Vallab h ar e Swis s citizens . 1 trus tthi s emai l i s sufficien tbu ti fan ysupplementa l filin g o n th e docke ti s necessary , pleas e le tm e know . Sincerely , Nic k Magal i
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00117-CR

Bradley Gregg

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 16th District Court

of Denton County (F-2014-0360-A)

December 1, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-4048) pertaining to the 1992, 1995 and 1996 Stock Option
Plans and Individual Officer and Director Stock Option Agreements and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-71017) pertaining to the 1998 Stock
Option Plan, 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, 1998 Employment
Incentive Option Plan, and the 1996 Stock Option Plan B of Medical Resources,
Inc. of our report dated March 15, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Medical Resources, Inc. for the years ended
December 31, 1998 and 1997, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                             /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Hackensack, New Jersey
 
March 25, 1999
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick 

THOMAS O. PETREE 

v. Record No. 0603-95-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

MARIE T. PETREE OCTOBER 17, 1995 

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHESTERFIELD COUNTY 

Herbert C. Gill, Jr., Judge 

 (Janet E. Brown, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Gail H. Miller; Smith & Miller, on brief), for 

 appellee. 

 Thomas O. Petree (husband) appeals the decision of the 

circuit court entering a qualified domestic relations order 

naming Marie T. Petree (wife) as the alternative payee for 

pension benefits due husband from his pension. Husband contends 

that the court erred in construing the parties' property 

settlement agreement to give wife an interest in the Kemper 

National Retirement Plan. Upon reviewing the record and briefs 

of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. 

 Rule 5A:27. 

 "Property settlement and support agreements are subject to 

the same rules of construction and interpretation applicable to 

contracts generally." Fry v. Schwarting, 4 Va. App. 173, 180, 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

355 S.E.2d 342, 346 (1987). "[O]n appeal if all the evidence 

which is necessary to construe a contract was presented to the 

trial court and is before the reviewing court, the meaning and 

effect of the contract is a question of law which can readily be 

ascertained by this court." Id. 

 At the ore tenus hearing, husband admitted that at the time 

the parties entered into the agreement, he was a participant in 

only one retirement plan and he did not know the plan's precise 

name. In the settlement agreement signed by the parties in 1987, 

the parties referred to husband's retirement plan as the "Kemper 

Corporation Retirement Plan." The plan in which husband actually 

is a participant is the "Kemper National Retirement Plan." 

 "'The tendency of the courts is to give to contracts life 

and virility by interpretation of their fair intendment--not to 

destroy them.'" Jennings v. Jennings, 12 Va. App. 1187, 1194, 

409 S.E.2d 8, 13 (1991) (citation omitted). The plain reading of 

the agreement indicates that husband and wife agreed that wife 

was entitled to fifty percent of husband's retirement benefits. 

Under husband's proffered interpretation of the agreement, he 

agreed to share with wife fifty percent of something in which he 

had no interest, while presumably retaining an undiminished 

interest in his full pension benefits. This interpretation is 

inconsistent with the stated purpose of the agreement to "settle 

all rights, interests, and obligations between them" and "in 

complete and final settlement of the interests of each in any 
- 3 - 

property, estate or interest of the other." 
- 4 - 

 Accordingly, the decision of the circuit court is summarily 

affirmed. 

 Affirmed.
#### Hobart JOHNSON, Appellant, v. Jack SURBER, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 29, 1958.

Glenn IT. Stephens, Williamsburg, for appellant.

G. G. Teague, Jr., C. B. Upton, Wil-liamsburg, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Hobart Johnson has filed a motion for an appeal from a judgment in the sum of $1,000 in favor of Jack Surber. On consideration of the record and briefs, no reversible error has been found.

The motion is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
#### City of Youngstown, Appellee, *v.*Hindman et al., Appellants, et al.

(No. 27648

Decided June 14, 1939.)

*Mr. Vern B. Thomas,*law director, for appellee.

*Mr. David C. Haynes,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.