05/12/2014 05:21 4252271007

DAVID F. SHAYNE FAAOFFICE OF REGJONAL COUNSEL 1601 LIND AVE., SW RENTON, WASHINGTON98057 TELEPHONE: (425) 227-2165 FACSIMILE: (425)227-1007

Inthe Matter of: Joseph D. Barbera ANM7


# R

FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 Judge Richard Goodwin


### COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Onor about June 4, 2014, Respondent served and filed a letter simply titled

..correspondence" containing three pages. The first 2 pages appear to bea Motion to Compel Discoveryand third a response to Complain,ant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Complainanthereby movesto strike the response to the Summary Judgment Motion as untimely, and moves for the Motion to Compel to be denied until such a time as the AdministrativeLawJudge (AL1) rules on Complainant'spending motions. 

### MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONSE AS UNTIMELY PAGE 02/04

Complainantfiled and served its Motion for Reconsideration and Summary Judgment onMay 6, 2014. See 13 C.P.R. 13.2ll(d). Respondent had ten (lO) days to respond to the motion, 13 C.P.R. 13.218(d),plus an additional five (5) days for service by mail. 13 C.F.R, 13.2ll(e). Consequently, he should haveresponded no later than by May 21,2014., As already argued inthe context ofRespondeut's failure to timely file an Answer, the Administrator hasheld that that Pro Se Respondents "are not exempt from the procedural rules governing c,ivil penalty proceedings. InRe Rushmore Helicopters, Inc. FAA OrderNo. 2012-8 (2012). While the Administrator has often shown ProSerespondents some leniency for missing "procedural deadlines", this occurs only when therespondenthas established good cause for failing to meetthe regulatory deadline. Inthe Matter of: Global Peace Initiative, Inc., FAA OrderNo. 2008-8 (2008). Indeed, "A showing ofgood cause is mandatory." (Id., emphasis inthe original).

FAA v. Joseph D. Borberll. COMPLAINANTS MOTION TO STRJKE RESPONSE TO MOTION l'OR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVSRY
FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 Page 1of3 DAVIDF. SHAYNE. FAA ATTORNllY TEL: (425) 227-2165; FAX: (415) 227-100705/12/2014 05:21 4252271007 ANM7



### As is true regarding his untimely Answer, Respondent has made no effort to establish good cause. At the very least, the AL.T should so require before denying Complainant's motions, both the original Motion for aJudgment on the Pleadings and this Motion to Strike. Accordingly, Complainant's Motion to Strike Respondent's response to Complainant's Motionfor SummarY Judgment should be granted. 

### RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Comes now Complainant inthe above-captioned matter and hereby moves for an Order denying Respondent's Motion to Compel, ifso coustmed. As the undersigned explained in an email (see Respondent's submission, page 2) Complainant will respond to Respondent's discovery requests ifand when Complainant's motions are denied, since, if 

### either motion is granted, the proceedings would be terminated. PAGE 03/04



### If, in fact, Complainant's are denied, Complainanthas no objection to the ALJ ordering each party to respond to discovery requests withinthirty (30) days ofissuance ofthe appropriate order or promulgation ofdiscovery requests (whichever is later). 

### MQTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE Ifboth ofComplainant's dispositive Motions (filed previously and currently pendi.ng) are denied, then Complainantrespectfully requeststhat the discovery completion deadline be extended for sixty (60) days from the date ofthe order denying the Motions, ifnecessarY. 

### CONCLUSION Forthe reasons stated above, Respondent should be required to show cause why he failed to timelyfile an Answer to the Complaint or; inthe alternative, summarYjudgment should be granted and thatRespondent be ordered to comply with Complainant's Final Notice ofProposed Civil Penalty as the final Orderinthis case. Ifboth motions are denied, the Complainantrequests an extension ofthe time to complete discovery. Respec1:ftdtySubmitted this 12thday ofJune 2014. / 

# . \' 

# /' ; 

# su
... DAVID F, SHAYNE FAA Attorney

FAA v.Joscph D. Barbera. COMPLAINANTS MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONSE TO MOTION POR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
FAA Case No. 2013NM090056 Page 2 of3 DAVID F. SI-lAYNE.FAA.ArToRNEY TEL: (42S) 227-2)65; fAX: (425) 227·100705/12/2014 05:21 4252271007 ANM7 PAGE 04/04



### CERT:WICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify thatthe foregoing COMPLAINANTS MOTION TO STRIKERESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS MOTION TO COMPELDISCOVERYhas been served 

### as designated bytherecipient's name this date, to the following: Federal Aviation Administration-Facsimile Attn: Heari.ng Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWrightBuilding- Suite 2Wl000 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, D.C. 20591 Fax: (202) 493-5142 JosephD Barbera- First Class and Return Receipt Requested Mail 14706 NE Erickson Dr. LaCenter, W A 98629-4405

Datedthis lih day ofJune 2014.

rri Kirk ffice ofRegional Counsel (ANM-7) Federal Aviation Administration

FAA v. Joseph D. Baroera_ 1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057 (425) 227-2007

COMPLAINANTS MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS MOHON TO COMPEL l)TSCOVERY
FAA Case No.**~013NM090056** Page 3 of3 DAVID F. SHAYNE. FAA ATTORNEY TEL: (4·25) 227-2165; FAX: (425) 227-100705/12/2014 05:21 4252271007 ANM7

FACSIMILE MESSAGE DAVID F. SHAYNE FEDERALAVIATION ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF REGIONAL COUNSEL ANM-7 1601 LIND AVENUE S.W. RENTON, WASHINGTON 98057 PAGE 01/04

The information contained in this facsimile message is legally privileged and confidential information and is intended only for the use ofthe individual named on this cover sheet Ifthe reader ofthis message is Mt the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copy ofthis facsimile is strictly prohibited. Ifyou have received this facsimile in error, please immediatelynotify us bytelephone at 425-227-2007.



### DATE: TO: FAX

### NO.: 

## PHONE NO.: June 

### 12, 2014 

### HearingDocket Clerk 

## (202) 493-5142
RE: Joseph 

### Email: Barbera Case No. 2013NM090056 

### NO. PAGES: 4 

## including cover FROM: 

## David F. Shayne FAXNO.: 

## 425-227-2165 PHONE NO.: 425-227-2160