alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, C. Patrick Machado, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Medivation, Inc. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



|       |  |                                                  
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /S/    C. PATRICK
MACHADO                        
|Name:  |  | C. Patrick Machado                               
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0263 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

A.M. and R.M., 

Youths in Need of Care. 

ORDER 

Counsel for the appellant mother of A.M. and R.M. filed a motion and brief asking 

to be allowed to withdraw from this appeal on grounds that counsel has been unable to find 

any nonfrivolous issues to raise on appeal, pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), MCA, and Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). The mother was granted time to file a 

response, but no response was filed. 

The Court has now independently examined the record pursuant to § 46-8-103(2), 

MCA, and Anders. We conclude there are no arguments with potential legal merit that 

could be raised in the mother's appeal in this case. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to 

the appellant mother personally. 

DATED this I, LA —Tay of November, 2023. 

FilLED 

NOV 1 4 2023 

Bowen Ureenw000

Cle,r1e, 

<,f 

hief Justice 

11/14/2023
LA-/J-44-• 

Justices 

2
Exhibit 31.1**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Joseph A. Sorge, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Stratagene Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and tothe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 10, 2005 By:              /s/ Joseph A. Sorge, M.D.    Joseph A. Sorge, M.D.    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
November 30, 2015
ID: FAA-2015-2842-0001 United States Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave ., SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 **Re: Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012** Dear Sir or Madam: As a supplementation to our original 333 Exemption Application, dated June 8th, 2015, we wish to provide to you the following additional information. The specific reasons we seek relief is to operate in the following areas of commerce: 1. Closed Set Filming Our MPTOM is outlined in the documents we have as a current attachment. Please refer to the attachment document labeled: MHDS_MPTOM.pdf: In addition, we are providing to you all of the Release forms we plan to use in our closed set filming operations. We hope this information helps sure up any concerns the FAA has toward our approval process. If more information is needed, we are always available to provide to your office any and all requested documentation. Thank you for you time and consideration.
Sincerely,

David Burritt Vintage Slots of Colorado, Inc. dba Mile High Drone Services 15875 Quandary Loop Broomfield CO 80023
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a) OR 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert E. Bies, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Greenfield
Online, Inc. (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Robert E. BiesRobert E. BiesExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: November 4, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Thomas S. Liston, the Chief Financial Officer, of eFunds
Corporation (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby
certifies to the best of his knowledge that:

(i)  the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of the Company
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 15, 2003

| |                     
| | --------------------
| | /s/ Thomas S. Liston
| |                     
| | Thomas S. Liston
Exhibit 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant


to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of CUI Global, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q of the quarter ended September 30, 2010, I hereby certify solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





CUI Global, Inc.





By:
/s/  William J. Clough

Dated this 9th day of May 2011.William J. Clough,Chief Executive Officer/President
Order filed, February 25, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00031-CV

____________

BRANDON WATSON, Appellant

V.

MEGHAN CLARK, Appellee

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-50546

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due February 19, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Marilee Anderson, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
jDcjr-osr-\'^^'v-2.i^^ 

January 2, 2011 

Eric J. Bamosky 

315 Mississippi Ave. 

Miles City, MT 59301-4133 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Air Service Division 

ATTN: Dennis J. DeVanny 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

m MEi\IT OF 

iSPORTATIOM 

:T OPFRATiONS 

H ^0 Q \2-\i\ 

RE: Essential Air Service (Eastern Montana) 

Dear Mr. DeVanny; 

Prior to Big Sky Airline ceasing to provide Essential Air Service to Eastern Montana, I was a 

frequent flier. On average, I would travel via Big Sky Airlines within the State of Montana once 

to twice a month. My employment requires me to travel to from Miles City to the State Capital 

in Helena at a minimum of once per month and occasionally as frequently as three times per 

month. The distance from Miles City to Helena is 375 miles one way. Big Sky Airlines' focus 

was to provide reliable fravel within the State of Montana connecting Eastern Montana with the 

major cities within the State. 

Since Great Lakes Aviation was awarded the Essential Air Service Contact for Eastern Montana, 

I haven't flown within the State of Montana once. Great Lakes Aviation provides air service 

from Eastern Montana to Denver to connect with the major airlines for interstate travel. If a 

traveler needs to travel intrastate between Eastern Montana and the major cities. Great Lakes 

Aviation is of no assistance. If I were to travel from Miles City to Helena via Great Lakes 

Aviation, the route would be as follows. Miles City to Billings, Billings to Denver, CO, and 

finally Denver, CO to Helena. Of course the travel time, poor connections, and fare makes flight 

this unfeasible. 

My needs are not unique. When I use to travel from Eastern Montana to Helena and other major 

cities within Montana, the plane was often frill. I can't begin to count the number of times others 

have shared with me since Big Sky Airlines ceased to provide service in Montana that they no 

longer use essential air service to travel within the state because the connections aren't provided 

by Great Lakes Aviation. 

I have no preference between Great Lakes Aviation and Gulfsfream International except to say 

that whoever is awarded the contract for this important service must be required to provide 
Essential Air Service that truly connects Eastern Montana vdth the remainder of the State, not 

just to Denver, CO for interstate travel. 

Thank you in advance for your consideration of Eastern Montana's needs in choosing an airline 

to provide Essential Air Service. 

Eric J. Bamosky 

Cc: Senator Max Baucus 

Senator Jon Tester 

Representative Denny Rehberg
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Fredrick Lorenzo Brooks, * From the 104th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 23185-B.

Vs. No. 11-22-00339-CR * March 21, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Trotter, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1304 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1304

To amend the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 with respect to the State 
   Trade and Export Promotion Grant Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2011

  Mr. Sablan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 with respect to the State 
   Trade and Export Promotion Grant Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Jobs Act Technical 
Corrections Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. STATE TRADE AND EXPORT PROMOTION GRANT PROGRAM.

    Section 1207(a)(5) of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (15 
U.S.C. 649b note) is amended by inserting after ``Guam,'' the 
following: ``the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,''.
                                 <all>
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-20-00029-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 213th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1557096D

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

BRANDON PAUL BRINK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

Appellant has moved to dismiss his appeal. Because we have not yet decided 

this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: August 20, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                This schecdule contains summary financial information
                extracted from form 10-K for this period ended
                June 30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
                by reference to such form 10-K.

</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1997 
<CASH>                                      26
<SECURITIES>                                 0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0 
<INVENTORY>                                  0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26
<PP&E>                                       0 
<DEPRECIATION>                               0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   66,192 
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0 
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                 3,505 
<OTHER-SE>                                   0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 0
<SALES>                                      0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        34,635 
<CGS>                                        0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                0   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        19,965  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (19,965) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (19,965) 
<DISCONTINUED>                               0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0 
<NET-INCOME>                           (19,965) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.01)


         

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 22.1



                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


                               STATE OR JURISDICTION
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                OF INCORPORATION            PERCENTAGE OWNED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commodore Solution
Technologies, Inc.                      Delaware                   100%

Commodore CFC
Technologies, Inc.                      Delaware                   100%

CFC Technologies, Inc.                  Ohio                       100%

Commodore Advanced
Sciences, Inc.*                         New Mexico
100%

A.S. Environmental, Inc.*               Delaware                   100%

Commodore Remediation
Technologies, Inc.*                     Delaware                   100%

Commodore Government
Environmental
Technologies, Inc.*                     Delaware                   100%

Commodore Technologies, Inc.*           Ohio
100%

Sandpiper Properties, Inc.*             Ohio                       100%

Environmental Alternatives, Inc.*       New Mexico
100%

Advanced Sciences Integrated
Mexico, S.A. de C.V.*                   Mexico                     100%

Advanced Sciences Integradas S.A.*      Argentina                  100%

CORT Technologies, Inc.*                Delaware                   100%

Commodore Refrigerant
Technologies, Inc.                      Delaware                   100%

-----------------------------

*  Wholly owned subsidiary of Commodore Solution Technologies, Inc.