alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 14, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 11309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID SBIR Phase II Clinical Trial 
Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U44 Clinical Trial Required).
    Date: March 7, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Poonam Tewary, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National 
Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42, Rockville, MD 
20852, (301) 761-7219, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87f3e2f0e6f5fef7c7eae6eeeba9e9eeefa9e0e8f1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="acd8c9dbcdded5dcecc1cdc5c082c2c5c482cbc3da">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 8, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-02989 Filed 2-13-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<Page>

                                                                       Exhibit 1
                              CONSULTING AGREEMENT

     An Agreement entered into as of the 1st day of April, 2001 by and between
InMedica Development Corporation, a Utah Corporation (the "Company") and Larry
E. Clark (the "Consultant").

     WHEREAS the Consultant is the Chairman of the Board of the Company; and

     WHEREAS the Company and the Consultant desire to formalize a consulting fee
arrangement;

     THEREFORE, based on the promises contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:

     1. The Company retains the Consultant to provide consulting services and
Consultant accepts such appointment beginning April 1, 2001. Pursuant to this
agreement, Consultant shall continue to render consulting services as he has
customarily rendered in the past.

     2. In consideration of this consulting services commitment, the Company
shall pay the Consultant the sum of $2,000 per month beginning April 1, 2001,
said amount to be accrued until such time as the cash flow of the Company
permits distribution, which time shall be determined in the sole discretion of
the board of directors.. Accrued amounts shall not bear interest. Consultant may
designate that payment be made to his consulting corporation.

     3. The Consultant agrees to hold entirely confidential all trade secrets
and other confidential information which he receives in connection with services
rendered to the Company.

     4. Either party may terminate this agreement without cause upon 30 days
prior notice to the other or by mutual agreement at any time.

     5. (a) This agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties on
the subject matter hereof and may only be changed or modified by a written
agreement between the parties.

     (b) All notices or other communications under this agreement shall be in
writing, shall be deemed to have been legally given and delivered when hand
delivered or sent certified mail, return receipt requested, to the party to be
notified.

     (c) In the event any provision or any part of any provision of this
agreement shall be held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, such holding shall
not affect any other provision or any part of the same provision which can be
given effect without the invalid provision or any part thereof.

<Page>

     (d) This agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts each of
which shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall
constitute one and the same agreement.

     (e) This agreement may not be assigned by either of the parties without the
prior written consent of the other.

                                               INMEDICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION


                                                By /s/ Ralph Henson
                                                Ralph Henson, President


                                                /s/ Larry E. Clark
                                                Larry E. Clark, Consultant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0361 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MAUREEN THERESE DOUBEK,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 18, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 13 2022

01/13/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0361
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 498 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 498

To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to deny SSI benefits for 
individuals whose disability is based on alcoholism or drug addiction, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 1995

Mrs. Hutchison introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVI of the Social Security Act to deny SSI benefits for 
individuals whose disability is based on alcoholism or drug addiction, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DENIAL OF SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME BENEFITS BY REASON OF 
              DISABILITY BASED ON ADDICTION TO ALCOHOL OR DRUGS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1614(a)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1382c(a)(3)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
    ``(I) An individual shall not be considered to be disabled for 
purposes of this title if (but for this subparagraph) alcoholism or 
drug addiction would be a contributing factor material to the 
Commissioner's determination that the individual is disabled.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1611(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1382(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations Relating To Savings Realized.--
From the amount which would otherwise have been expended for fiscal 
years 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000, but for the amendments made by this 
section, there are authorized to be appropriated for each such fiscal 
year--
            (1) $95,000,000 for substance abuse treatment services 
        grants through the Federal Capacity Expansion Program under 
        section 1971 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300y); 
        and
            (2) $5,000,000 for the medication development project of 
        the National Institute on Drug Abuse to improve drug abuse and 
        drug treatment research.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to determinations made after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-18921,
333-66077 and 333-74961) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-90727, 33-21853,
33-26239, 33-47547, 33-59233, 333-00575, 333-03245, 333-18269, 333-35422, 333-70692,
333-70696, 333-118280, 333-118281, 333-118282, 333-118283 and 333-118284) of Tribune Company of our report dated March 4,
2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Selected Financial Data" in this
Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
March 4, 2005

115

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheets and statements of operations found on pages F-2 and F-3 of
the Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          47,594
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    141,572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,919
<PP&E>                                         385,935
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 864,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          454,423
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,060
<OTHER-SE>                                     172,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   864,665
<SALES>                                        390,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               390,410
<CGS>                                          247,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,082,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              42,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (868,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (868,125)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

         The following is a list of all subsidiaries of First Equity Properties,
Inc., the state or other jurisdiction of organization or incorporation and the
names under which such subsidiaries do business (indention means direct parent
relationship):



                                                  Jurisdiction of
                                                  Organization or
         Name of Entity                            Incorporation

*First Equity Properties, Inc.                        Nevada

Carmel Realty, Inc.                                   Texas

Regis Management Corporation (formerly
Williamsburg Management Corporation)                  Nevada









-------------
* First Equity Properties, Inc. is also the holder of 99% limited partner
  interest in Carmel Realty Services, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership.
#### McCamey, Appellant, *v.*Payer, Appellee. 

(No. 27365

Decided January 11, 1939.)

*Mr. Martin J. Monahen,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Payer, Corrigan, Blehveiss <& Go oh,*for appellee.

*12It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Williams, Myers and Hart, JJ., concur.

Day and Matthias, JJ., not participating.
Exhibit 32.4



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                               |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                         |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|                         | 
|Dated: November 14, 2005 |  |                              
|                         |  | /s/ Dale E. Parker           
|                         |  | Name:                         |  | Dale E. Parker         
|                         |  | Title:                        |  | Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 2468

ELMER EDGARDO SARACAY VASQUEZ
,
Petitioner
,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR
, Attorney General
, Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : August 31, 2020 Decided: September 9, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE
, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Raymond O. Griffith, THE LAW OFFICE OF RAYMOND O. GRIFFITH, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland , for Petitioner. Joseph H . Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Jessica E. Burns, Senior Litigation Counsel, Juria L. Jones
, Office of Immigration Litigation
, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington , D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Elmer Edgardo Saracay Vasquez , a native and citizen of El Salvador
, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismiss ing his appeal
from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of

removal. * We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Saracay
Vasquez’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record
evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings,

see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)

— including the adverse credibility finding

— and that
substantial evidence supports the denial of relief in this case, see INS v. Elias

- Zacarias,
502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992)

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons
stated by the Board. In re Saracay Vasquez (B.I.A. Nov. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* Saracay Vasquez does not challenge the denial of his request for protection under the Convention Against Torture. He has therefore waived appellate review of this claim. See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004).
NUMBER 13-15-00036-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

 

HESIQUIO CANTU, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the record and appellant’s brief. Appellant’s 

brief was filed on September 15, 2015. Appellee has not filed a brief. The Court, having 

fully examined the record and appellant’s brief hereby ORDERS appellee to file its brief 

with this Court on or before May 23, 2016. Further motions for extension of time 
2

will not be favorably entertained by the Court.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

25th day of April, 2016.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 12, 2004

Mr. Jeffrey Wallace Hellberg

Jeffrey W. Hellberg, Jr., P.C.

1601 Elm Street, Suite 4340

Dallas, TX 75201

Honorable Mary Murphy

14th District Court

500 Commerce Street, 3rd Floor

Dallas, TX 75202

Mr. Christopher M. Weil

Weil & Petrocchi, P.C.

1601 Elm Street, Suite 1900, LB 100

Dallas, TX 75201

Mr. Robert M. Fitzgerald

Law Offices of Robert M. Fitzgerald

1919 S. Shiloh Road, Suite 308

Garland, TX 75042

Mr. Tom Thomas

Kolodey,  Thomas & Blackwood, L.L.P.

5910 N. Central Expressway, Suite 700

Dallas, TX 75206

Wayne Frena

221 Benton Drive 

Roanoke, TX 76262

Mr. Mark Ralston

Locke, Purnell, Rain & Harrell

2200 Ross Avenue

Suite 2200

Dallas, TX 75201

Mr. C. Thomas Wesner Jr.

Wesner Coke & Clymer, P.C. 

13155 Noel Road, Suite 800 

Dallas, TX 75240

Mr. Jeffrey Charles Tasker

Kane Russell Coleman & Logan, P.C.

1601 Elm Street, Suite 3700

Dallas, TX 75201-7207

Mr. Sim Israeloff

Cowles & Thompson, P.C.

901 Main Street, Suite 4000

Dallas, TX 75202

Ms. Melissa Ann Mitchell

Figari & Davenport, LLP

901 Main Street, Suite 3400

Dallas, TX 75202-3796

RE:Case Number:  04-0277

Court of Appeals Number:  05-04-00191-CV

Trial Court Number:  02-11425-A

Style:IN RE  WORTH ROSS, RECEIVER FOR STATEPARK BUILDING GROUP, LTD., THE COLONNADE AT TURTLE CREEK, L.P., STATEPARK COLLEYVILLE, LTD., BLACKBURN/TRAVIS/COLE, LTD.,  AND PORTOBELLO, LTD.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas issued the enclosed order in the above referenced-cause.

Sincerely,

Andrew Weber, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 04-0277Page 2**
**Exhibit 32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      W.
      Gray Hudkins, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report of Langer, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Langer, Inc.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
                  April 2, 2007
              
              
              /s/ W.
                GRAY HUDKINSW.
                  Gray Hudkins*President
                  and Chief Executive Officer*
                *(Principal
                  Executive and Financial
                  Officer)*
#### A. J. MORRIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30318.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 11, 1959.

Wheat & Zbranek, Liberty (J. C. Zbran-ek, Liberty, of counsel), for appellant.

W. G. Woods, Jr., County Atty., Liberty, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Art. 1377, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., makes it unlawful for any person to fish or hunt upon the enclosed lands of another without consent.

This prosecution was for a violation of that statute and arose in justice court. Upon conviction, appeal was to the county court where conviction followed, with a punishment fixed at a fine of $25.

Appellant recognizes that under Art. 53, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., this court has jurisdiction upon appeal of a case originating in justice court only when the fine imposed exceeds $100.

It is insisted, however, that the above statute has no application here, because the punishment imposed is more than a fine in that, in addition to the fine imposed, appellant’s hunting license and his right to hunt within this state for a period of one year are forfeited, upon conviction. It is appellant’s contention that the forfeiture of the license and the privilege to hunt is a part of the penalty and that, therefore, the case was not within the jurisdiction of the justice court but was in the original jurisdiction of the county court.

If appellant’s contention be correct, then the justice court did not acquire jurisdic*683tion of the offense in the first instance. I-the justice court had no jurisdiction, then the county court acquired none by the appeal.

The appeal should therefore be dismissed. Art. 60, C.C.P.

Appellant’s right to attack the judgment of conviction, as being void for the want of jurisdiction in justice court, by writ of habeas corpus is not here foreclosed *or*determined.

The appeal is dismissed.