alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.7FIRST AMENDMENT TOMEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING**        This **FIRST AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING** (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of December 30, 2002, among **ALTERRA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION**, a Delaware corporation (“**Tenant**”) and the **ENTITIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE 1**to this Amendment (collectively, “**Landlord**”).**R E C I T A L S****A.        **Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Master Lease dated April 9, 2002 (the “Lease”) pursuant to which Tenant has leased from Landlord the Premises as described therein.**B.        **Pursuant to that certain Memorandum of Understanding dated April 9, 2002 (the “Original Memorandum of Understanding”), Tenant requested, and Landlord agreed, to forbear from exercising certain remedies available to Landlord upon a bankruptcy filing by Tenant and certain other potential defaults under the Lease.  Initially capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings given to them in the Original Memorandum of Understanding.**C.**        Tenant has requested, and Landlord has agreed, to modify certain terms and provisions of the Original Memorandum of Understanding, and to clarify certain terms and provisions of the Lease, as hereinafter set forth. **A G R E E M E N T        **NOW**,**THEREFORE**, in consideration of the foregoing Recitals (which by this reference are incorporated herein), and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:1.        **Filing Deadline**.  The definition of the Filing Deadline in Section 6 of the Original Memorandum of Understanding is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following substituted in lieu thereof:**“Filing Deadline”** shall mean January 31, 2003.2.        **Insurance**.  The final sentence of Section 3 of the Original Memorandum of Understanding is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following substituted in lieu thereof:Upon the earlier of the Plan Effective Date or June 30, 2003, whichever first occurs, Tenant shall have in place the policies of insurance required under Section 6 of  the Lease, as modified by Schedule 3 to the Lease.**
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kevin A. Yanoscik, certify that;

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of PurchaseSoft, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to her registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is make known to us by others within those entities particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a dated within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which cold adversely affect the registrants' ability to record, process,
summarized and report financial data and have identified for the registrants
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls: and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls: and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not their were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 9, 2007                          /s/ Kevin A. Yanoscik
                                               -----------------------------
                                               Kevin A. Yanoscik
                                               Secretary, Treasurer and Director
#### Ashley W. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L. Todd LEE, False Prophet; Rodney K. Pritchard, FBI Agent in Columbia; Martin D. Brown, FBI Agent in Greenville; Mark Moore, Assistant United States Attorney; William Catoe, United States Magistrate Judge; David Plowden, Assistant Federal Public Defender in Greenville; John H. Hare, Assistant Federal Public Defender in Columbia, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-6720.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 15, 2002.

Decided Aug. 29, 2002.

Ashley W. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Ashley W. Carter appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 *701U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2002) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Carter v. Lee,*No. CA-02-779-2-20-AJ (D.S.C. Apr. 17, 2002). We also deny Carter’s motions to recuse Judges Herlong and Catoe and for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

p0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

138134

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138134 COA: 288401 Isabella CC: 2000-009485-FH MARK L. WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 10, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 24.9**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**(Annual Report on Form 10-K)**

The undersigned, an officer and/or director of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., constitutes and appoints Nicholas Konidaris, Paul Oldham and KerryMustoe, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts and things and execute in his or her name as an officer or director of the Company the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 3,2010 and any and all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm all that saidattorneys and agents and each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Any one of said attorneys or agents shall have, and may exercise, all powers conferred. 

Dated: May 12, 2010.
**EXHIBIT      31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

|   | 1. | I                have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K                of                Merisel, Inc.; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | [Intentionally                omitted]; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | [Intentionally                omitted]; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | [Intentionally                omitted]. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------|

|                                          |                                          |                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|                                          | .                                             |
|                                     |                                     |                          |
| Date:                 September 29, 2006 |                                          | /s/                Jon H. Peterson |
|                                          | Jon                H. Peterson                |
|                                          | Title:                Chief Financial Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1330 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1330

To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of the 
 flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder in 
                           the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2011

  Mr. Larson of Connecticut introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of the 
 flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder in 
                           the line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Hometown Heroes Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING THE FLAG TO BE FLOWN AT HALF-STAFF IN THE EVENT OF 
              THE DEATH OF A FIRST RESPONDER SERVING IN THE LINE OF 
              DUTY.

    (a) Amendment.--The sixth sentence of section 7(m) of title 4, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``possession of the United 
        States'' and inserting a comma;
            (2) by inserting ``, or the death of a first responder from 
        any State, territory, or possession, who dies while serving in 
        the line of duty'' after ``while serving on active duty,'';
            (3) by striking ``and'' after ``former officials of the 
        District of Columbia'' and inserting a comma; and
            (4) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        first responders from the District of Columbia''.
    (b) First Responder Defined.--Such subsection is further amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) the term `first responder' means a firefighter, 
        police officer, or emergency medical service provider.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply to 
deaths occurring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Marty - 2nd of two. Please include in the Coso Redes (0336) e-docket. Thanks again.

----- Forwarded by Doris Lo/R9/USEPA/US on 07/29/2010 11:42 AM -----

From: Meredith Kurpius/R9/USEPA/US

To: Doris Lo/R9/USEPA/US@EPA
Cc: Jan Taradash/R9/USEPA/US@EPA, Jerry Wamsley/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/20/2010 03:10 PM Subject: Re: Summary of monitoring issues that should be addressed by the Great Basin District

Hi All, I finally got Chris Lanane on the phone and here's the latest:

-the contractor's trailer was moved so that the contractors no longer need to drive past the site -the drive area was covered with gravel so that any time a contractor does need to pass the site it doesn't kick up a big plume of dust -the turning area pavement was enlarged to prevent kicking up dust at the edges -Coso Operating Co. has NOT started watering yet which still leaves the area susceptible to windblown

dust -Coso Operating Co. has NOT yet submitted their mitigation plan to GB -GB is planning to install cameras at the site to help identify the sources of any high levels of dust

Chris Lanane also said that he is not aware of any exceedances over the past month. Because Coso Operating Co. has not yet started wate ring, GB is still treating their data as invalid. Chris said that he will follow-up with Coso Op. Co. on both t he watering and the mitigation plan (he will cc. me on any emails). Chris said that he will prepare a formal memo to add ress our remaining issues (Doris' list below) and he will send the mitigation plan from Coso Op. Co. when he gets it. I think that's all the news for now.

-Meredith

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Meredith Kurpius, PhD Air Division, US EPA 75 Hawthorne St., AIR-7 San Francisco,CA 94105 415-947-4534 (p) 415-947-3579 (f)
4 ( 

# • RCRAREVISION CHECKLIST 16 Paint Filter Test 50 FR 18370-18375

April 30, 1985. (HSWA Cluster I) STATE ANALOG IS: FEDERAL REQUIREMENT FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION MORE BROADEQUIV- STRIN- ER IN ALENT GENT SCOPE PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES SUBPART B - GENERAL FACILITY STANDARDS GENERALWASTE ANALYSIS WAC 173-303 SUBPART E - MANIFEST SYSTEM, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING 

# • analyses methods
OPERATING RECORD test results 264.13(b)(6)·

264.73(b) (3) -300(5)(f)
WAC 173-303 -380(1)(c) -300(4)(f) 

### x

x SUBPART N - LANDFILLS SPECIALREQUIREMENTS FOR BULKAND CONTAINERIZED LIQUIDS WAC 173-303 paint filter test 264.314(c) -140(4)(b)(iii) X PART 265 - INTERIM STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, AND DISPOSAL**FACILIT~ES** SUBPART B - GENERAL FACILITY STANDARDS

SUBPART E - MANIFEST SYSTEM, RECORDKEEPING, AND REPORTING 

# • GENERALWASTE ANALYSIS analyses methods
OPERATING RECORD 265.13(b)(6) WAC 173-303 -300(5)(f)
WAC 173-303 X

April 30, 1985 - Page 1 of 2RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 16: Paint Filter Test (cont'd) 

### ,- \'..; 

# • FEDERAL REQUIREMENT test results FEDERAL RCRA CITATION 265.73(b)(3) ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION

-300(4) (f) -380(1) (c) STATE ANALOG IS: MORE BROADEQUIV- STRIN- ER IN ALENT GENT SCOPE 

## x



# •

• SUBPART N -**~DFILLS** SPECIALREqUiREMENTS FOR BULKAND CONTAINERIZED LIQUIDS WAC 173-303 140(4)(b)(iii) paint filter test 265.314 (d) 

### &400(3) X

April 30, 1985 - Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of New Millennium Media
International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us, particularly during the
         period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:    May 10, 2004               New Millennium Media International, Inc.

                                    /s/ Mark R. Chandler
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    Mark R. Chandler
                                    COO/CFO
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. C LARENC E TSOSIE, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-10485

D.C . No. 3:13-c r-08149-NVW -1 M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na John A. Ja

rve y , C hie f Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 28, 2016 ** B e fore : HUG, FAR

R IS, an d LEAVY, C irc uit Judge s. C la re nc e Tsosiea

p pe a l s from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c o nvic tion a nd 120-m onth se nte n c e for a ssa ult re sulting in se

rious injury , in viola

tion of 18 U.S.C . §§ 1153 a nd 113(a )(6). Pursua

nt to Ande rs v . C alifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Tsosie ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f sta ting tha t the re 

# F IL ED F EB 01 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).are n o grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d

Tsosiethe opportunity to file a pro se supple m e nt a l brie f. No pro se supple m e nt a l brie f or a nswe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Tsosie ha s wa ive d

his right to a

ppe a l his c onvic tion, se nte nc e , a n d orde r of re stitution. B e c a

use t he re c ord disc lose s no a

rgua ble issue a s to theva lidity of the a ppe a l wa ive r, we dism iss thea ppe a l . Se eUnite d State

s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w a s c ounse l is G RANT E D . DISM I SSE D .

2
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1423 Engrossed in House (EH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1423

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, as the ``Specialist 
                   Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST MICHEAL E. PHILLIPS POST 
              OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Specialist Micheal E. Phillips Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 2, 2011.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
112th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1423

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 115 4th Avenue Southwest in Ardmore, Oklahoma, as the ``Specialist 
                   Micheal E. Phillips Post Office''.
```