alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 15, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 184 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-183, CP2024-189.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-03085 Filed 2-14-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
| Name                                                               |   | Percentage Owned |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
|  Sichuan Apollo Solar Science & Technology Co., Ltd.      |   |             | 100 | %  (Owned by Apollo Solar Energy, Inc.) |
|  Sichuan Xinlong Telurium Industry & Technique Co., Ltd.  |   |             | 100 | %  (Owned by Sichuan Apollo Solar Science & Technology Co., Ltd) |
|  Sichuan Shimian Dadu River Mining & Metallurgy Co., Ltd. |   |             | 100 | %  (Owned by Sichuan Xinlong Telurium Industry & Technique Co., Ltd) |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


         I, Shane Polson, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Technol Fuel
         Conditioners, Inc.

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
         untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact
         necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
         under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by this quarterly report.

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
         information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
         material respects the financial condition, results from operations and
         cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
         this quarterly report.


               By: /s/ Shane Polson                         DATE: March 14, 2006
                   ------------------------
                      Shane Polson
                      President, Acting Chief Operating Officer,
                      Treasurer, and Chairman
**Exhibit 23.1**

 
| HAROLD Y.  SPECTOR, CPA |   | **SPECTOR & WONG, LLP**  |   | 80 SOUTH  LAKE AVENUE |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
| CAROL S.  WONG, CPA     |   | Certified Public Accountants |   |                  |
|                    |   | SUITE 723                    |   |                  |
|                    |   | (888) 584-5577               |   | PASADENA, CA  91101   |
|                    |   | FAX  (888) 584-8033     |   |                  |

 

 

 

CONSENT OF HAROLD Y SPECTORINDEPENDENT AUDITOR

 

I consent to the use of my report dated August 14, 2003, on thefinancial statements of PurchaseSoft, Inc. as of May 31, 2003 included hereinand to the reference made to me.

 

I consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement of the aforementioned report and to the use of my name as it appearsunder the option “Experts”.

 

 
| /s/ Harold Y Spector, CPA |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Pasadena, California      |
| August 14, 2003           |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER OF THE COMPANY PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14

 

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas J. Meshako, certify that:

|  | 1. |  | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Merchants Bancshares, Inc.; and |
|--|----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--|----|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date:    March 17, 2015

 

/s/ Thomas J. Meshako

Thomas J. Meshako

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Principal Accounting Officer

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on her knowledge:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June
     30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.


Date:  August 9, 2004

                                /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                -------------------------
                                Michelle A. Alexander
                                Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CareScience, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Ronald Paulus, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Ronald Paulus                      |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Ronald Paulus                          |
| President and Chief Executive  Officer |
| August 7, 2003                    |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toCareScience, Inc. and will be retained by CareScience, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000725627
<NAME> HEALTHWATCH, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          21,746
<SECURITIES>                                 1,769,671
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (26,310)
<INVENTORY>                                     83,864
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,449
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,547,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,643,869
<BONDS>                                        480,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,794
<COMMON>                                        32,857
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,856,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,547,972
<SALES>                                      1,220,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,220,803
<CGS>                                          940,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  940,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,938,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              67,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,748,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,748,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,748,931)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Richard Lee Percivill, Jr., Appellant

No. 06-19-00186-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 48,443-

B). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and 

Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s bill of costs and judgment

by deleting the time payment fee. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Richard Lee Percivill, Jr., has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 23, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Jesus Jose Rojas GUZMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 39090.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 2, 1966.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1966.

*825No attorney of record on appeal for appellant.

W. Barton Boling, Dist. Atty., Mike J. Thompson and Robert D. Earp, Asst. Dist. Attys., El Paso, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for robbery; the punishment, seven and one-half years.

The state moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that appellant did not give notice of appeal in open court and no notice of appeal appears in the minutes of the court.

The only notice of appeal appearing in the record is contained in an affidavit of appellant before a notary public in El Paso County which was filed with the clerk of the trial court on July 26, 1965.

This was not a compliance with the requirements of Art. 827, C.C.P., and did not confer jurisdiction upon this court. Anderson v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 525, 309 S.W.2d 239; Reid v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 333 S.W.2d 139; Harper v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 366 S.W.2d 789.

The state’s motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0578

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

DAVID LLOYD ORR,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 16, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2021

07/12/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0578
Exhibit








Company Name and Address


[# of shares]
[City] [Date]


Re: Stock options


Dear ___________,


We are pleased to inform you that you were granted [_________] stock options in the Company at the Board meeting of the Company held on __________ ___, 201_ according to authorizations provided by the shareholders meetings on August 10, 2016 and according to the rules governing the stock options plan of _____________ (the “Rules”), as attached. 


Subject to condition of continued employment provided in Section 2.5 of the Rules, these stock options may be exercised for shares according to the following vesting schedule:


		
	•
	Options for [# of shares] (25%) may be exercised from [date of first anniversary of grant] to [date of ninth anniversary of grant] inclusive


		
	•
	Options for an additional [# of shares] (25%) may be exercised from [date of second anniversary of grant] to [date of ninth anniversary of grant] inclusive


		
	•
	Options for an additional [# of shares] (25%) may be exercised from [date of third anniversary of grant] to [date of ninth anniversary of grant] inclusive


		
	•
	Options for an additional [# of shares] (25%) may be exercised from [date of fourth anniversary of grant] to [date of ninth anniversary of grant] inclusive




The exercise price of the options granted is USD _____. 


These stock options are not transferable. We invite you to refer to the Rules for more detail with regard to the rules applicable to your options.  


We thank you in advance to duly sign and write “Read and Approved”, on the present letter and attached copy of the “Rules” and return them to our HR Department (Evelyne Beauzon or Michelle Moore).


Yours sincerely, 


[COMPANY]


By: __________________________
     Name: 
     Title: 
Signature: _____________________
                 [Name of Beneficiary]


Attachment: Rules governing the Stock Option Plan 201__
**EXHIBIT 24.8**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**(Annual Report on Form 10-K)**

The undersigned, an officer and/or director of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., constitutes and appoints Nicholas Konidaris, John Metcalf and Kerry Mustoe, and eachof them, his or her true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts and things and execute in his or her name as an officer or director of the Company the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 2, 2007 and any and allamendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agents andeach of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Any one of said attorneys or agents shall have, and may exercise, all powers conferred. 

Dated: July 26, 2007.
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted), Tim Page, Principal Accounting Officer of Lion
Capital Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best
of his knowledge:




1. the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,
2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and






2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 14, 2008
            /s/
      Tim Page
              Tim
      Page
              Principal
      Accounting Officer
January 5, 2016

Ryan T Stevens

DBA: REAL HOME PIX

949 Meadow Drive, Copper Canyon, TX 75077

Phone: 214-543-1039

Email: ryanstevensrealty@gmail.com

Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012 

A. Operator’s Name: Ryan T. Stevens

 Operator’s Address: 949 Meadow Drive, Copper Canyon, TX 75077

B. SPECIFIC APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FROM WHICH RELIEF IS REQUIRED:

-14 CFR §§ 

-61.23(a) and (c)

-61.101(e)(4) and (5)

-61.113(a)

-61.315(a)

-91.7(a)

-91.119(c)

-91.121

-91.151(a)(1)

-91.405(a)

-91.407(a)(1)

-91.409(a)(1) and (2)

-91.417(a) and (b)

C. HOW THE OPERATOR WILL MAINTAIN AN EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY OR NO 

ADVERSE IMPACT TO SAFETY:

1. PERFORM ROUTINE SOFTWARE/FIRMWARE UPDATES TO THE UAS, IT’S BATTERIES 

AND R/C.

2. PERFORM PRE-FLIGHT CHECKS OF THE UAS INSURING ALL HARDWARE AND 

PARTS ARE IN OPERABLE CONDITION. THIS WOULD INCLUDE THE UAS, IT’S 

PARTS(PROPELLERS, MOTORS, CAMERA, GIMBLE, LANDING MECHANISM), R/C, 

AND MONITORING DEVICE(IPAD,, IPHONE, TABLET, HDMI MONITOR)

3. INSURE THAT THE OPERATOR DOES NOT OPERATE THE AIRCRAFT UNDER THE 

INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL, DRUGS, OR PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION WHICH COULD 

IMPAIR HIS ABILITY TO FLY THE UAS SAFELY.

4. FLY IN ACCORDANCE TO THE FAA “SMALL UAS CERTIFICATION OF REGISTRATION”:

5. ATTEND CLASSES AND INSTRUCTION TO MAINTAIN AN UP TO DATE KNOWLEDGE 

AVIATION LAW AND UAS REGULATION AND FLIGHT SKILLS.
6. ONLY FLY IN AIRSPACE WHEN GIVEN PERMISSION BY THE OWNER OF THE 

PROPERTY.

D. HOW GRANTING EXEMPTION WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST:

- THE GENERAL PUBLIC WOULD BE ABLE TO ENJOY AERIAL VIDEO AND 

PHOTOGRAPHY AFTER BEING CAPTURED WITH THE CONSENT OF THE OWNER 

OF THE REAL PROPERTY.

E. THE PROPOSED OPERATIONS:

-TO CAPTURE AERIAL IMAGES AND VIDEO OF REAL PROPERTY INCLUDING 

 HOMES AND LAND FOR SALE, CAPTURE AERIAL IMAGES AND VIDEO OF 

 CONSTRUCTION SITES INVOLVING RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL 

 STRUCTURES.

F. THE MAKE AND MODEL OF THE AIRCRAFT FOR PROPOSED OPERATIONS:

- DJI INSPIRE 1: MODEL T 600USING THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT AND SPECS; 

(see next page)

Safety guidelines for flying your unmanned aircraft:

 • Fly below 400 feet 

 • Never fly near other aircraft 

 • Keep your UAS within visual line of sight 

 • Keep away from emergency responders 

 • Never fly over stadiums, sports events or groups of 

people 

 • Never fly under the influence of drugs or alcohol 

 • Never fly within 5 miles of an airport without first 

contacting air traffic control and airport authorities
#### HAGOOD’S CONOCO SERVICE STATION et al., Appellants, v. Nancy FAGLIE et al., Appellees.

No. 4218.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

March 12, 1964.

*948William G. Washington, Ulmer W. Spinney, Austin, for appellant.

Jack C. Eisenberg, Austin, for appel-lees.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by Nancy Faglie, a minor, for personal injuries sustained by her; and by her father Edward Faglie for medical expenses incurred for Nancy; as a result of an intersection collision between defendants’ automobile and a motorcycle upon which Nancy was a passenger.

Trial was to a jury which found:

> 1)Defendants’ driver failed to keep a proper lookout; which was a proximate cause of the collision.

> 2) Conduct of the driver of the motorcycle was not the sole proximate cause of the collision.

> 3) The value of necessary medical expenses rendered Nancy, as a proximate result of her injuries was $839.35.

> 4) Issues inquiring as to damages to Nancy in her individual capacity were answered *NONE.*

The Trial Court entered judgment on the verdict for plaintiff Edward Faglie for $839.35; and further rendered judgment that plaintiff Nancy Faglie take nothing.

Thereafter Nancy Faglie made motion for a new trial, which the Trial Court granted *“as to Nancy Faglie only.”*

Defendants appeal the judgment in favor of plaintiff Edward Faglie, contending there is no evidence to support the jury’s finding on proximate cause.

Plaintiffs move to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, contending that the appeal of the defendant is *untimely in*that a final judgment has not been entered as to *all*parties of the case.

There was no order severing Nancy’s claim from that of her father, and plaintiffs contend that without such a severance, there is not a final appealable judgment.

A judgment which does not dispose of all parties and issues in the pending suit, is interlocutory and not appeal-able, unless a severance of that phase of the case is ordered by the Trial Court. In the absence of an order of severance, a party against whom such an interlocutory judgment has been rendered will have his right of appeal, when and not before, the same is merged in a final judgment disposing of the whole case. Pan Am. Petroleum Corp. v. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co., 159 Tex. 550, 324 S.W.2d 200; Sears v. Mund Boilers, Inc., C.C.A., W/E Ref., 328 S.W.2d 199.

Appeal dismissed.