alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, the ChiefFinancial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”), herebycertifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (“Form 10-Q”), filedconcurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

Dated:  May 13, 2004

 

 
| /s/ Harry Brill          |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Harry Brill              |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6680
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEITH ALAN KIRK, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-107, CA-95-1057-5-F) Submitted: December 19, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Alan Kirk, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Edwin Hamilton III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for discovery to supplement the record and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Kirk , Nos. CR-90- 107; CA-95-1057-5-F (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2

                                 April 14, 1998



EXECUTONE Information Systems, Inc.
478 Wheelers Farms Road
Milford, CT  06460

                       ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE
                       FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
                              (FILE NO. 000-11551)
                              -------------------


Gentlemen:

This firm has reviewed the information set forth in the fifth paragraph under
"Overview of Business and Strategy" under Item 1., Business, and the information
set forth in the fifth paragraph under Item 3, Legal Proceedings, of the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 of EXECUTONE
Information Systems, Inc. (the "Company"). We understand that the information
set forth therein as it relates to the issue of the authorization of the
National Indian Lottery under 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seg. is based upon the advice
provided to the Company by this firm.

We consent to the summarization of such advice and the reference to us in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Very truly yours,

HUNTON & WILLIAMS

<PAGE>
#### Joe EALY, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30209.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 17, 1958.

*711James E. Faulkner, Coldsprings, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for driving while intoxicated, with punishment assessed at three days in jail and a fine of $75.

Appellant was apprehended while driving an automobile on a public highway by a peace officer who testified that he was definitely intoxicated.

Appellant contends that the complaint upon which the information was predicated was invalid because the affiant who signed and swore thereto was not a credible person within the meaning of the statute, Art. 415, C.C.P.

It is claimed that affiant was not a credible person because he did not swear truthfully to the complaint — that is, that the affiant swore, as a fact, that the appellant had committed the offense charged therein when, in truth, he swore entirely upon information and belief.

An ■ allegation that the affiant “has good reason to believe and does believe” is sufficient, and there is no necessity for the affiant to swear positively as to the existence of the facts stated therein. Branch’s P.C., Sec. 498, p. 485. Nor does an affiant to a complaint have to be a witness to the transaction covered in the affidavit. Parnell v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 278 S.W.2d 850.

The term “credible person,” as used in the statute, has reference to the competence of the affiant to testify for the state in the particular case in which the complaint is made. Branch’s P.C., 2d Edition, Sec. 499, p. 486. Whether one is a credible person within the meaning of the statute is not to be determined upon the truth or falsity of the statements contained in the complaint.

The complaint was not subject to the defect alleged.

The judgment is affirmed.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 489

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into an appropriate

form of agreement with the Town of Grand Lake, Colorado, authorizing

the town to maintain permanently a cemetery in the Rocky Mountain

National Park.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into

an appropriate form of agreement with the Town of

Grand Lake, Colorado, authorizing the town to maintain

permanently a cemetery in the Rocky Mountain National

Park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OF CEMETERY IN ROCKY MOUN4 TAIN NATIONAL PARK.

5 (a) AGREEMENT.—Notwithstanding any other law,

6 not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of

7 this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall enter into an
2

•S 489 IS

1 appropriate form of agreement with the Town of Grand

2 Lake, Colorado, authorizing the town to maintain perma3 nently, under appropriate terms and conditions, a ceme4 tery within the boundaries of the Rocky Mountain Na5 tional Park.

6 (b) CEMETERY BOUNDARIES.—The cemetery shall be

7 comprised of approximately 5 acres of land, as generally

8 depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Grand Lake Cemetery’’ and

9 dated February 1995.

10 (c) AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION.—The

11 Secretary of the Interior shall place the map described in

12 subsection (b) on file, and make the map available for pub13 lic inspection, in the headquarters office of the Rocky

14 Mountain National Park.

15 (d) LIMITATION.—The cemetery shall not be ex16 tended beyond the boundaries of the cemetery shown on

17 the map described in subsection (b).

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Transition Report of iPCS, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the transition period from October 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Timothy M. Yager                                                                 |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy  M. Yager, President and Chief Executive Officer                              |
| February 13,  2006                                                               |
|                                                                                  |
|                                                                                  |
| /s/  Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr.                                                    |   |
| Stebbins  B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
| February 13,  2006                                                               |

 

1

----
*       *       *       *       *
 
  
 EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification
  
   The
undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wincroft,
Inc.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Wincroft, Inc. and will be retained by
Wincroft, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
   
 July
      11, 2008
              /s/ Xiaojin
      Wang
 Xiaojin
      Wang (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer)
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Fernberg, Appellant. (Two Cases.)

(Nos. 27469 and 27470

Decided March 29, 1939.)

*Mr. John D. Ellis,*city solicitor, *Mr. Robert J. Paul*and *Mr. Charles B. Ginocchio,*for appellee.

*Mr. Parher Fulton, Mr. Louis Fernberg, Mr. Morris J. Leher*and *Mr. Benjamin S. Schwarts,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that said appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.

*Appeals dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Gateway Industries, Inc. (now known as Function (X) Inc.) (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Janet Scardino, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Dated:  April 8, 2011
By:
/s/ Janet ScardinoName:
Janet ScardinoTitle:
Chief Executive Officer and Director
[Letterhead of Rosenberg Smith & Partners]



Consent of Independent Chartered Accountants







To the Securities and Exchange Commission


We hereby consent to the use of our report which was dated September 12, 2003,
in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of On the Go Healthcare, Inc., for
the period ended July 31, 2003, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of
this Registration Statement.

We hereby consent to the use of our report which was dated December 12, 2003,
in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of On the Go Healthcare, Inc., for
the period ended October 31, 2003, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part
of this Registration Statement.

We hereby consent to the use of our report which was dated March 10, 2004,
in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of On the Go Healthcare, Inc., for
the period ended January 31, 2004, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part
of this Registration Statement.

We hereby consent to the use of our report which was dated June 11, 2004,
in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of On the Go Healthcare, Inc., for
the period ended April 30, 2004, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part
of this Registration Statement.





ROSENBERG SMITH & PARTNERS



ROSENBERG SMITH & PARTNERS

/s/ Rosenberg Smith & Partners
-----------------------
Chartered Accountant


June 16, 2004


<PAGE>
elf-ex107b_734.htm



 

Exhibit 10.7(b)

 

Amendment to the e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan

Effective March 15, 2017

This Amendment to the e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) is effective as of the date first set forth above, such amendment having been approved by the Board of Directors of e.l.f. Beauty, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on March 15, 2017 in accordance with Section 10.1 of the Plan. 

As of result of the foregoing approval, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1.Section 11.3 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

“11.3Removed and Reserved.”

 

2.Section 13.7 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

“13.7Removed and Reserved.”

 

(Signature Page Follows)

 

 

 



 

The undersigned, being the duly appointed and acting Corporate Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies that the foregoing amendment was duly approved and adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company effective as of the date first referenced above. 


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Scott K. Milsten

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Name:
	
Scott K. Milsten

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Title:
	
Corporate Secretary
• 

2/24/92 SPA 9 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 77 

HSWA Codification Rule, Double Liners; Correction
 

55 FR 19262-19264
 

May 9, 1990
 

(HSWA Cluster II)
 

Note: The final rule addressed by this checklist corrects 264.221(c) and 264.301(c) as promulgated on July 15, 1985
 

(50 FR 28702; Revision Checklist 17 H). This correction is based on a decision reached in the U.S. Court of Appeals
 

for the District of Columbia on June 23, 1987 concerning a lawsuit filed against EPA. States not yet authorized for
 

Revision Checklist 17 H are encouraged to adopt these corrections at the same time the Revision Checklist 17-H 

provisions are adopted. 

FEDERAL 

REQUIREMENT 

FEDERAL 

RCRA 

CITATION 

ANALOGOUS 

STATE 

CITATION 

STATE ANALOG IS:-

MORE 

EQUIV- STRINALENT GENT 

BROADER IN 

SCOPE 

PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS 

WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES WAC 173-303 

SUBPART K - SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 

DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS 

1_ insert "for units where 

the Part B of the 

permit application is 

received by the 

Regional Adninistrator - after Novenber 8, 

• 

1984" after "permit" 264.221Cc) 

DESIGN AND OPERATING REQUIREMENTS 

add sentence regarding applicability of 

264.301(c) only where 

650(2)CJ) 

SUBPART N - LANDFILLS 

x 

Part B of the penuit

application is 

received after ~ovember 8, 1984 264.301(c) 665(2)(h) 

in this paragraph; 

X 

this is a typographical error in the FR for 

• May 9, 1990 - Page 1 of 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DONOVAN BURGHER and SHARON BURGHER
, Appellant s ,

v.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1361

[ April 9, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Howard H. Harrison, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2013

- CA

- 007033

.

Donovan Burgher and Sharon Burgher, Lake Worth, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, and William P. Heller of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. 1

G ROSS
, M AY and G ERBER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20

- 23 (the requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20

- 94 (suspending and tolling any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law for 45 days from April 2, 2020). We trust any motions directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our

mandate.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Public Media Works, Inc. (the
Company), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 19, 2007

|                                                                                      
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                      
|/s/ Corbin Bernsen                                                                    
|Corbin Bernsen                                                                        
|Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)                                 
|                                                                                      
|/s/ Mark Smith                                                                        
|Mark Smith                                                                            
|Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The docket ID EPA - R07 - SFUND - 2014 - 0 70 0 printed in the Federal Register for the notice entitled

Proposed Prospective Purchaser Agreement Modification: Kansas City Structural Steel Superfund Site, Kansas City, KS , published on February 7, 2014, is a misprint. P lease search for docket ID EPA- R07 - SFUND - 2014 - 0070 .
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 333-4048) pertaining to the 1992, 1995 and 1996 Stock Option
Plans and Individual Officer and Director Stock Option Agreements and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-71017) pertaining to the 1998 Stock
Option Plan, 1998 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, 1998 Employment
Incentive Option Plan, and the 1996 Stock Option Plan B of Medical Resources,
Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2000 (except for the third paragraph of
Note 2, as to which the date is March 29, 2000), with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Medical Resources, Inc.,
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
1999.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                           ---------------------

MetroPark, New Jersey

March 30, 2000
The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by

consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1468

___________

Marvin L. King, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Bruce Babbitt, Secretary, Department *

of the Interior, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 28, 1997

 Filed: November 3, 1997

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Marvin L. King appeals from the district court&s adverse grant of summary

1

judgment, based on res judicata, in King&s employment discrimination action against

Department of the Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt. We have carefully reviewed the

record and the parties& briefs, and conclude that the district court did not err. 
-2-

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its

opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1324 

To eliminate sweetheart deals under the Patient Protection and Affordable 

Care Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2011 

Mr. BUCHANAN (for himself, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. 

HUELSKAMP, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To eliminate sweetheart deals under the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF SWEETHEART DEALS UNDER 

4 PPACA. 

5 (a) REPEALS.—Effective as if included in the enact6 ment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

7 (Public Law 111–148, in this section referred to as 

8 ‘‘PPACA’’) or, in the case of paragraph (1), as if included 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1324 IH

1 in the enactment of the Health Care and Education Rec2 onciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), the fol3 lowing provisions are repealed: 

4 (1) SWEETHEART DEAL TO PROVIDE TEN5 NESSEE WITH MEDICAID DSH FUNDS.—Clause (v) of 

6 section 1923(f)(6)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 

7 U.S.C. 1396r–4(f)(6)(A)), as added by section 

8 1203(b) of the Health Care and Education Rec9 onciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152). 

10 (2) SWEETHEART DEAL TO PROVIDE HAWAII

11 WITH MEDICAID DSH FUNDS.—Clause (iii) of section 

12 1923(f)(6)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

13 1396r–4(f)(6)(B)), as added by section 

14 10201(e)(1)(A) of PPACA. 

15 (3) SWEETHEART DEAL TO PROVIDE LOUISIANA

16 WITH A SPECIAL INCREASED MEDICAID FMAP.—Sub17 section (aa) of section 1905 of the Social Security 

18 Act, as added by section 2006 of PPACA. 

19 (4) SWEETHEART DEAL THAT INCREASES

20 MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT JUST FOR FRONTIER

21 STATES.—Section 10324 of PPACA (and the 

22 amendments made by such section). 

23 (5) SWEETHEART DEAL GRANTING MEDICARE

24 COVERAGE FOR INDIVIDUALS EXPOSED TO ENVIRON25 MENTAL HAZARDS IN LIBBY, MONTANA.—Section 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1324 IH

1 10323 of PPACA (and the amendments made by 

2 such section). 

3 (6) SWEETHEART DEAL FOR A HOSPITAL IN

4 CONNECTICUT.—Section 10502 of PPACA. 

5 (b) ELIMINATION OF SWEETHEART DEAL THAT RE6 CLASSIFIES HOSPITALS IN MICHIGAN AND CONNECTICUT

7 TO INCREASE THEIR MEDICARE REIMBURSEMENT.—Sec8 tion 3137(a) of PPACA, as amended by section 10317 of 

9 such Act, is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

11 (A) by striking ‘‘FISCAL YEAR 2010’’ and 

12 all that follows through ‘‘for purposes of imple13 mentation of the amendment’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘FISCAL YEAR 2010.—For purposes of imple15 mentation of the amendment’’; and 

16 (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and 

17 (2) by striking paragraph (3). 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS