alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Mark R. Richards, President and Chief Executive Officer of Appleton Papers Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):



a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 18, 2005



|           |  |                                                       
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|           | 
|Signature: |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                                  
|           |  | Mark R. Richards President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1
BOUGHT AND SOLD NOTES


                                    ---------
                                    SOLD NOTE
                                    ---------


Transferee  TOP LINK HI-TECH DEVELOPMENT (H.K.) LIMITED
Address     Flat/Rm B 11/F., Vienna Mansion, 55 Paterson Street, Causeway Bay,
            Hong Kong
Occupation  Corporation


Name of company in which the share(s) to be transferred -


HYTECHNOLOGY  LIMITED


Number of share(s)       -9,900- Ordinary of $1.00 each
Consideration received   HK$9,900.00


/s/ Dehou Fang
------------------
(Transferor)
For and on Behalf of
INTSYS SHARE LIMITED

Hong Kong, Dated 12 May 2004


<PAGE>
                                   -----------
                                   BOUGHT NOTE
                                   -----------


Transferor  INTSYS SHARE LIMITED
Address     Sea Meadow House, Blackburne Highway, (P.O.Box 116), Road Town,
            Tortola, Bristish Virgin Islands
Occupation  Corporation


Name of company in which the share(s) to be transferred -


HYTECHNOLOGY LIMITED


Number of share(s)       -9,900- Ordinary of $1.00 each
Consideration received   HK$9,900.00


/s/  Xuejun Wang
--------------------
(Transferee)
For and on Behalf of
TOP LINK HI-TECH DEVELOPMENT (H.K) LIMITED

Hong Kong, Dated 12 May 2004


<PAGE>
#### Burle Marvin CLIFTON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27852.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1955.

*353No attorney for appellant on appeal.

Howard M. Fender, Crim. Dist. Atty., Eugene D. Biddle, Asst. Dist. Atty., Grady Hight, Asst. Dist. Atty., Conard Florence, Asst. Dist. Atty., Fort Worth, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin for the State.

PER CURIAM.

. The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 90 days in jail and a fine of $200.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT (10)(b)

                         OPINION AND CONSENT OF ACTUARY

<PAGE>

                [Transamerica Life Insurance Company Letterhead]

May 13, 2004

Transamerica Life Insurance Company
4333 Edgewood Road NE
Cedar Rapids, Iowa  52499-0001

Re:      Flexible Premium Variable Annuity - G
         Separate Account VA W
         Registration on Form N-4

Dear Sir/Madam:

With regard to the above registration statement, I have examined such documents
and made such inquiries as I have deemed necessary and appropriate, and on the
basis of such examination, have the following opinions:

Fees and charges deducted under the Flexible Premium Variable Annuity - G
policies are those deemed necessary to appropriately reflect:

(1)      the expenses incurred in the acquisition and distribution of the
         policies,

(2)      the expenses associated with the development and servicing of the
         policies,

(3)      the assumption of certain risks arising from the operation and
         management of the policies and/or riders to the policy and that
         provides for a reasonable margin of profit.

Fees and charges assessed against the policy values in the variable account
include:

(i)      Service Charge and Administrative Charge

(ii)     Mortality and Expense Risk Fee (M&E)

(iii)    Taxes (including premium and other taxes if applicable)

(iv)     Surrender Charges

(v)      Any applicable rider fees or charges

<PAGE>

Transamerica Life Insurance Company
May 13, 2004
Page 2


The magnitude of each of the individual charges listed above in (i) through (v)
is established in the pricing of the Flexible Premium Variable Annuity - G, to
achieve a reasonable Return on Investment (ROI), which is within the range of
industry practice with respect to comparable variable annuity products.

Except by coincidence, it is not expected that actual charges assessed in a
given year would exactly offset actual expenses incurred. Acquisition expenses
(as well as major product and/or systems development expenses) are incurred "up
front" and recovered, with a reasonable profit margin, through future years'
charges. In addition, the company cannot increase certain charges under the
policies in the pricing process.

Therefore, in my opinion, the fees and charges deducted under the policies, in
the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses
expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by the company.

I hereby consent to the use of this opinion, which is included as an Exhibit to
the registration statement.

/s/ Tim Bennett
------------------------------------
Tim Bennett, ASA, MAAA
Assistant Actuary
Transamerica Life Insurance Company
August 11, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOHN EDWARD WALLACE, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00533-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on May 13, 2015. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, John Edward Wallace.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 31.2**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Steve R. Martin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Stratagene Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and tothe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 10, 2005 By:              /s/ Steve R. Martin    Steve R. Martin    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section
1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D., the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Telik, Inc. (the Company), and Cynthia M. Butitta, the Chief Operating Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, his or her knowledge:



1.The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and



2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 5thday of May, 2005.



|                                     |  |  |  |                                                    
|------------------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL M. WICK                  |  |  |  | /s/ CYNTHIA M. BUTITTA                             
|Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D.         |  |  |  | Cynthia M. Butitta                                 
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gerald Lau, President and Chief
Executive Officer, and Eddie Chou, Chief Financial Officer, of Biopack
Environmental Solutions Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Biopack
      Environmental Solutions Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc.                                                                             

Dated: November 19, 2007

/s/
      Gerald LauGerald LauPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Eddie
      ChouEddie ChouChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and
      PrincipalAccounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Biopack Environmental Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Biopack
Environmental Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,690
<SECURITIES>                                    39,054
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (280)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,175
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,129
<PP&E>                                           1,504
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,412
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        58,204
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,436
<SALES>                                          1,583
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,583
<CGS>                                            1,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,131
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,595)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)


</TABLE>
______ ________________________________________ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 10, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly
126121(66) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, INC., NWS MICHIGAN, INC., and NATIONAL WINE & SPIRITS, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants, SC: 126121

v CoA: 243524

STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee, and Ingham CC: 02-000013-CZ

MICHIGAN BEER & WINE WHOLESALERS AS SOCIATION, Intervening Defenda nt-Appellee.

_____________ _______________ ___________

On order of the Chief Ju stice, the motion by General Wine & Liquor, Inc. and Vintage Wine Company for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 10, 2006

Clerk
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

OTILIO OSTORGA CRUZ,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General,

Respondent.

No. 15-72889

Agency No. A070-639-740

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Otilio Ostorga Cruz, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review 

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings 

 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 16 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72889

conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review 

for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen and review de novo 

constitutional claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 

2005). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Ostorga Cruz’s motion to 

reopen, based on lack of notice, where Ostorga Cruz no longer disputes that he was 

personally served a Notice to Appear (“NTA”) that informed him of his obligation 

to update the court with a current address, and he failed to inform the court that the 

address listed on his NTA was no longer his current address. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (a motion to reopen in absentia proceedings based on lack of 

notice may be filed at any time); 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(B) (no notice of hearing 

required if the alien has failed to inform the government of a change in address).

Contrary to Ostorga Cruz’s contention, the agency did not err or violate due 

process by not providing the contents of the NTA in Spanish. See Flores-Chavez 

v. Ashcroft, 362 F.3d 1150, 1155 n.4 (9th Cir. 2004) (“Current law does not require 

that the Notice to Appear . . . be in any language other than English.”); Lata v. INS, 

204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (an alien must show error and prejudice to 

prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned  hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial  Officer of
Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report  of the  Fund on Form  10-Q  for the  quarter  ended
     September 30, 2002 (the "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements of
     Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.


Dated:  November 14, 2002


                                /s/ Michelle A. Alexander
                                --------------------------
                                Michelle A. Alexander
                                Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT


I, Maurice H. Madrid,  Director/Acting  Financial  Officer of Sales  Strategies,
Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended
September  30, 2002 (the " Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o (d); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:    September 22, 2003



                                 /s/ Maurice H. Madrid
                                 ---------------------
                                 Maurice H. Madrid, Director/
                                 Acting Financial Officer
#### Isaac GRAY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; Commissioner of Corrections, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 02-6906.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 2002.

Decided Aug. 2, 2002.

Isaac Gray, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Isaac Gray appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. *Gray v. Maryland Parole Comm’n,*No. CA-02-837-CCB (D. Md. filed May 24, 2002 & entered May 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *562and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*