alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hubert BRANTLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30263.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1959.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White and Carol Vance, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*826WOODLEY, Judge.

Judgment was rendered on April 10, 1958, finding appellant guilty of driving a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated and assessing as punishment thirty days in jail and a fine of $250.

Motion for new trial was filed the same day, alleging that the judgment was contrary to the law and the evidence.

The term of court adjourned on May 31, 1958, without any ruling on the motion for new trial and with no notice of appeal having been given.

On June 20, 1958, during the next succeeding term, an order was entered overruling appellant’s original motion for new trial and containing notice of appeal.

The motion for new trial filed April 10, 1958, not having been acted upon was overruled by operation of law on April 30, 1958. Art. 755, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Brinkley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 320 S.W.2d 855; Pruitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 310 S.W.2d 338; Barton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 310 S.W.2d 90; Atkinson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 299 S.W.2d 951; DeHay v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 294 S.W.2d 401; Mahan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 288 S.W.2d 508.

This Court having held that Art. 768 V.A.C.C.P. as amended in 1957, requiring a sentence to be pronounced in a misdemeanor case, is invalid, the conviction herein became final when the motion for new trial was overruled. Barton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 310 S.W.2d 90.

 To confer jurisdiction upon this Court notice of appeal must be given during the term at which the conviction occurred. Art. 826, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; DeHay v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 294 S.W.2d 401; Pruitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 310 S.W.2d 338.

The appeal is dismissed.

DAVIDSON, Judge

(dissenting).

I dissent to the dismissal of the appeal ini this case for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Brinkley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 320 S.W.2d 855.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual
report of Trinity Place Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 2, 2013 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard G. Pyontek, Chief Financial Officer
and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Richard G. Pyontek                           | 
|------------------------------------------------ | 
|Richard G, Pyontek                               | 
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | 
|Trinity Place Holdings Inc.                      | 
|July 1, 2013                                     |
Exhibit 32.1

      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
                to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection  with the  quarterly  report of OnScreen  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-QSB of the quarter  ended  September  30, 2004, I hereby
certify  solely for the purpose of complying  with 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)   The quarterly  report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13
      (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company

OnScreen Technologies, Inc.


By:  /s/ John"JT" Thatch                    Dated this 12th day of November 2004
   ---------------------------------------
         John "JT" Thatch
      CEO/President/Director
#### The State, ex rel. Hoschar, Gdn., *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 27547

Decided May 24, 1939.)

*446
      *Mr. G. Jay Clark*and *Mr. Charles Boyd,*for relator.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. Felker,*for respondent.

By the Court.

The writ of mandamus will issue to compel the exercise of discretion, but not to control it. 25 Ohio Jurisprudence, 1003, Section 28; *Sutphin*v. *State, ex rel. Jeby,*130 Ohio St., 183, 198 N. E., 483.

The petition pleads that the respondent made payments and then failed and refused to pay, but that pleading does not set forth in full or in substance the *447order of the commission discontinuing payments. If the order is based upon the ground that the injured employee has been fully compensated, the determination of the commission is final and mandamus will not lie in the absence of abuse of discretion. State, *ex rel. Stahl,*v. *Industrial Commission, ante,*168; *State, ex rel. Depalo,*v. *Industrial Commission,*128 Ohio St., 410, 191 N. E., 691.

If the commission discontinued compensation on a jurisdictional ground, an application for rehearing could be filed under Section 1465-90, General Code, and an appeal taken after adherence to its former order by the commission; in which event, mandamus would not lie as there is an adequate remedy at law.

The demurrer will be sustained and leave will be granted to amend the petition.

*Demurrer sustained.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the Registration
Statements  on  Form  S-8  (No.'s  333-102025,  and  333-104593)  of  Imaging
Technologies  Corporation  of our report dated November 7, 2002 appearing in the
June  30,  2003  Annual  Report  of  this  Form  10-K.

/s/  Stonefield  Josephson,  Inc.

STONEFIELD  JOSEPHSON,  INC.
Irvine,  California

November  12,  2003
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SUSAN COCHRAN,

Appellant,

V.

WILLIAM SHANE COCHRAN

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 15

- 00181

- CV

Appeal from the

109th District Court

of Andrews County, Texas

(TC# 19,636)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8724-8725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02529]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

[NARA-2024-014]


State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory 
Committee (SLTPS-PAC); Meeting

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), National Archives 
and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice of Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing an upcoming meeting of the State, Local, 
Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory Committee (SLTPS-PAC) in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory

[[Page 8725]]

Committee Act and implementing regulations.

DATES: The meeting will be on February 21, 2024, from 10 a.m. to 11 
a.m. (EST).

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be a virtual meeting. We will send 
instructions on how to access the meeting to those who register 
according to the instructions below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Harris Pag[aacute]n, ISOO 
Senior Program Analyst, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0a3bca4a0a3afa0b1b3b09e918291de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4b7a8b0b4b7bbb4a5a7a48a859685ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 357-5351. 
Contact ISOO at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6afb5a9a9a688879487c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0e9f3efefe0cec1d2c18ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and 
implementing regulations at 41 CFR 102-3. The Committee will discuss 
matters relating to the classified national security information 
program for state, local, tribal, and private sector entities.
    Procedures: Please submit the name, email address, and telephone 
number of people planning to attend to Heather Harris Pag[aacute]n at 
ISOO (contact information above) no later than February 20, 2024. We 
will provide meeting access information to those who register.

Merrily Harris,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-02529 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Index of ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/ozwv /Ozonesonde/

Up to higher level directory

Name SizeLast Modified 1_Photos_Ozonesondes 9/29/2015 8:58:00 PM Boulder, Colorado 5/30/2014 12:00:00 AM Field Projects 10/28/2014 12:00:00 AM Hilo, Hawaii 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM Huntsville, Alabama 2/20/2014 12:00:00 AM Narragansett, Rhode Island 7/8/2014 12:00:00 AM Ozonesonde Instructions 6/25/2014 12:00:00 AM Pago Pago, American Samoa 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM San Cristobal, Galapagos 9/1/2015 6:06:00 PM SkysondeWorkshop_2015_03_02.pptx 19468 KB 3/13/2015 12:00:00 AM South Pole, Antartica 9/29/2015 3:55:00 PM Summit, Greenland 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM Suva, Fiji 2/18/2014 12:00:00 AM Thumbs.db 19 KB 8/27/2015 6:15:00 PM Trinidad Head, California 2/20/2014 12:00:00 AM fleoutREADME.docx 18 KB 8/28/2014 12:00:00 AM Index of ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/ozwv/Ozonesonde/ ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/ozwv/Ozonesonde/

1 of 1 10/1/2015 2:14 PM
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-41088

Summary Calendar

 

C. ELIJAH MUHAMMAD, also known as

Christopher Mitchell,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BUREAU OF PRISONS; E. CHANDLER, Warden;

K. TIMMS, Lieutenant; SHEFFREY S. WARD;

UP MCGOWAN; UP NYLEN; P. DUMAS,

 Defendants-Appellees.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-324

-----------------------------------------------------------

April 24, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

C. Elijah Muhammad, federal prisoner # 0271-088 who was formerly confined at the United

States Penitentiary in Beaumont, Texas, appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his civil action

brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Names Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971), for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. He argues that he exhausted his

administrative remedies by filing an administrative tort claim pursuant to 28 C.F.R. §§ 2671 et seq.

Inmates are required to exhaust available administrative remedies before filing a civil action. See 42

U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Wright v. Hollingsworth, 260 F.3d 357, 358 (5thCir. 2001). The Federal Bureau
-2-

of Prisons’ administrative remedy procedures are separate from the procedure for filing an

administrative tort claim and are codified in 28 U.S.C. §§ 542.10, 542.13, 542.14, and 542.15.

Muhammad has not shown that he exhausted his administrative remedies as required by § 1997e(a).

See Porter v. Nussle, ___ U.S. ___ (U.S. Feb. 26, 2002, No. 00-853), 2002 WL 261683 at *10.

Therefore, he has not shown that the district court erred in dismissing his action for failure to exhaust

available administrative remedies.

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) The undersigned, Paul F. Walsh, the Chief Executive Officer, of eFunds Corporation (the Company),
and Thomas S. Liston, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, hereby certifies that, to the best of their knowledge: (i) the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 of the Company (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: May 9, 2005/s/ Paul F. WalshPaul F. WalshChief Executive Officer and Chairman/s/ George W. GreshamGeorge W. GreshamChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iPCS, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/ Timothy M. Yager                                                                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy M. Yager, President and Chief Executive Officer                              |
| Date: November 4, 2008                                                          |
|                                                                                 |
|                                                                                 |
| /s/ Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr.                                                    |   |
| Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |
| Date: November 4, 2008                                                               |

 

1

----
STATE OF LOUISIANA

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

WESLEY RICKS

NO. 2023 KW 0824

OCTOBER 23, 2023

In Re: Wesley Ricks, applying for supervisory writs, 20th

Judicial District Court, Parish of West Feliciana, No. 

16259. 

BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include

a file -stamped copy of the " Petition for a Writ of Habeas

Corpus", the State' s response, if any, and any other portion of

the district court record that might support the claims raised

in the writ application. Therefore, this court cannot adequately

review the ruling at issue herein. Supplementation of this writ

application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be

considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, 

Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event relator elects to file a new

application with this court, he may do so without the necessity

of obtaining a return date. Any future filing on this issue

should include the entire contents of this application, the

missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling. 

JEW

GH

EW

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          98,851                  22,045
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,109                  57,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,585)                 (3,448)
<INVENTORY>                                         30                      41
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,820                 103,443
<PP&E>                                         143,110                 119,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                (70,625)                (61,042)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 408,053                 266,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,408                  84,640
<BONDS>                                          2,349                   4,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           455                     400
<OTHER-SE>                                     282,791                 177,147
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   408,053                 266,573
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               305,228                 220,318
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  300,129                 211,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,860                   1,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,239                   7,742
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,702                  15,641
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                537                 (7,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       537                 (7,899)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01                  (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01                  (0.20)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 5248)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Animal Models for Hepatitis B and C (R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         February 29, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 South 4th Street, RML 31/3118A, Hamilton, MT 59840 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dylan P. Flather, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 South 4th Street, RML 31/3118A, Hamilton, MT 59840, (406) 802-6209,                         *dylan.flather@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 22, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-01572 Filed 1-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Corbin Bernsen, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: October 23, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Corbin Bernsen                                     
|                       |  |  |  | Corbin Bernsen                                         
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.