alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Pamela J. CraigPamela J. CraigChief Financial Officer of Accenture
Ltd,
general partner of Accenture SCA
(principal financial officer) A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 15, 2010                                       |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                       |   |   |   |
| /s/ Ronald Conquest                                        |   |   |   |
|                                                            |   |   |   |
| Ronald ConquestChief Executive OfficerWindGen Energy, Inc. |   |   |   |
|                                                       |   |   |   |

----
NO. 07-03-0013 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L D APRIL 29, 2003

______________________________ OSCAR BALDERAS,

Appellant
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_________________________________ FROM THE 64 TH DISTRI CT COURT OF HALE COUNT Y; NO. A13518-9909; HON. JACK R. MILLER, PRESIDING

_______________________________ ABATEMENT AND REMAND

__________________________________ Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMP BELL, JJ. Oscar Ba lder as ( app ellan t) a ppe als his con viction for driv ing w hile intoxicated. The clerk’s record wasfiled on January 30, 2003, and the reporter’ s record was filed on March 7, 2003. Thus, appellant’s brief was due on April 7, 2003. Howev er, one was not filed on thatdate. By lett er, this Court notified appellant of t he e xp ired dea dline and dire cte d him to respond to our letter by Monday , April 28, 2003, or the appeal would be abated to the2

trial court pursuant to T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8. That date has lapsed, and appellant still has yet to file a brief. Consequentl y, we abate this appeal and rem and the cause to the 64 th Distr ict Court of Hal e Co unt

y (t rial court) fo r f urt her pro cee ding s. Upo n re m and , th e tr ial c our t sh all im m edia tely

cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a he aring to determ ine the following: 1. w het her

app ellan t de sire s topro sec ute the app eal; 2. whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel; and, 3. whethe r appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due to appe llate couns el’s failure to timely file an appellate brief. See Evi

tts v. Lucey

, 469 U.S. 38 7, 394, 105 S.Ct . 830, 834-35, 83 L.Ed.2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an indigent d efe nda nt is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on th e first appeal as of right and that counsel m ust be available to ass ist in preparing and subm itting an appellate brief). We fur the r dir ect the tria l court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing subj ects. Should the tria l court find that appellant desires to pursue this

app eal, is indig ent , an d ha s be en d enie d ef fec tiveass ista nce of coun sel, then
we further

direct the court to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the app eal. The nam e, address, phone num ber, telefax num ber, and state bar num ber of the new counsel who will repr esent appel lant on app eal mustalso be included in the court’s findings of fact and conc lusions of law. Furtherm ore, the trial court shall also cause to be developed 1) a supplem ental clerk’s record containing the findi ngs of fact and conclusions of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argum entpresented at the aforem entioned hearing. Additiona lly, the trial c ourt shall ca use the suppl emental clerk’s3

record to be f

iled with t he clerk o f this co urton or before May 28, 2003. Should additional ti me be needed to perf orm these tasks, the trial court may requestsam e on or before May 28, 2003. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
#### Ex parte Frank Rance PARKER.

No. 38261.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1965.

Robert B. Billings, Dallas, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding remanding relator to custody for extradition to the State of Kansas to answer a charge “by information” of Burglary and Larceny.

There is no evidence in the record indicating that the offense of “Burglary and Larceny” may be prosecuted in Kansas upon an information. In absence of proof that the law of Kansas in this regard differs from that of Texas, it is assumed that prosecution for such offense upon an information is not authorized by Kansas law. Ex parte Doyal, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 83, 318 S.W.2d 642; Ex parte Goodwin, Tex.Cr.App., 384 S.W.2d 874; Ex parte Gardner, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 365, 264 S.W.2d 125; Ex parte Cooper, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 642, 295 S.W.2d 906; on second appeal, Tex.Cr.App., 308 S.W.2d 22. Furthermore, the information is not supported by affidavit or complaint and the supporting affidavit of the prosecuting attorney is upon information and belief only. See Ex parte Logan, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 129, 205 S.W.2d 994; Ex parte Kinsloe, 134 Tex.Cr.R. 299, 115 S.W.2d 955, and cases therein cited.

We further observe that the hearing was before a “special judge” and the record fails to show his authority to hold the hearing or to enter the order from which this appeal was taken. See Arts. 1886, 1891, 1934 Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.; Art. 556 Vernon’s Ann.GC.P.; 33 Tex.Jur.2d 469, Sec. 95.

The order remanding relator to custody for extradition is reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 621 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 621

To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Great Western 
  Trail for potential addition to the National Trails System, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 24 (legislative day, March 23), 1995

 Mr. Bennett (for himself, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Brown, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
 Stevens, and Mr. Hatch) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Trails System Act to designate the Great Western 
  Trail for potential addition to the National Trails System, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE GREAT WESTERN TRAIL AS A STUDY TRAIL.

    Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 U.S.C. 1244(c)) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (36), as added by Public Law 
        103-145, as paragraph (37); and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(38) The Great Western Scenic Trail, a system of trails to 
accommodate a variety of travel users in a corridor approximately 3,100 
miles in length extending from the Arizona-Mexico border to the Idaho-
Montana-Canada border, following the approximate route depicted on the 
map entitled `Great Western Trail Corridor, 1988', which shall be on 
file and available for public inspection in the Office of the Chief of 
the Forest Service, Department of Agriculture. The trail study shall be 
conducted by the Secretary of Agriculture, in consultation with the 
Secretary of the Interior, in accordance with subsection (b) and shall 
include--
            ``(A) the current (as of the time of the study) status of 
        land ownership and potential use along the designated route;
            ``(B) the estimated cost of acquisition of lands or 
        interests in land, if any; and
            ``(C) an examination of the appropriateness of motorized 
        trial use along the trail.''.
                                 <all>
```
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1310 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain emergency 

medical devices from the excise tax on medical devices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2011 

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. GRIMM, Mr. JONES, Mr. LATOURETTE, Mr. ROSS

of Florida, Mr. STIVERS, and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

certain emergency medical devices from the excise tax 

on medical devices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEALING FIRST RESPONDERS EMERGENCY 

4 MEDICAL EQUIPMENT TAX. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 4191(b) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘and’’ at the end of subparagraph (C), by redesig8 nating subparagraph (D) as subparagraph (E), and by inVerDate Mar 15 2010 04:52 Apr 02, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1310.IH H1310

rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1310 IH

1 serting after subparagraph (C) the following new subpara2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(D) qualified emergency medical devices, 

4 and’’. 

5 (b) QUALIFIED EMERGENCY MEDICAL DEVICE.— 

6 Subsection (b) of section 4191 of such Code is amended 

7 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) QUALIFIED EMERGENCY MEDICAL DE9 VICE.—The term ‘qualified emergency medical de10 vice’ means any medical device of a type furnished 

11 by first responders or ambulance services in pro12 viding out-of-hospital or pre-hospital care, or trans13 port to a medical care facility, for individuals— 

14 ‘‘(A) with illnesses, injuries, or other med15 ical emergencies, or 

16 ‘‘(B) in need of medical transport, extri17 cation, or evacuation.’’. 

18 (c) CERTAIN EXEMPTIONS MADE APPLICABLE.— 

19 (1) The last sentence of subsection (a) of sec20 tion 4221 of such Code is amended by striking 

21 ‘‘(4),’’. 

22 (2) The last sentence of paragraph (2) of sec23 tion 6416(b) of such Code is amended by striking 

24 ‘‘(C),’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1310 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to sales after December 31, 2012. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
```
**EXHIBIT 32

                                            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

         In connection with the Annual Report of Security Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Frank West, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

              A.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

              B.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    March 30, 2004

                                                              /s/ Frank West
                                                             -----------------------------------------
                                                              Frank West
                                                              Chief Executive Officer

         In connection with the Annual Report of Security Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Connie Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               C. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and

               D. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Date:    March 30, 2004

                                                              /s/ Connie Hawkins
                                                              ----------------------------------------
                                                              Connie Hawkins
                                                              Chief Financial Officer
```
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|--------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 9, 2006
|----------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Thomas E. Faust Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greenfield Online, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 to be filed
with Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
Report), I, Albert Angrisani, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

By:
/s/ Albert Angrisani
                    
    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                Albert Angrisani
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
                    
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 9, 2006
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            



|Date: November 9, 2009
|----------------------



|/s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
|-----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
The State of 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 4, 2015

No. 04-15-00277-CR

John Forrest LOWE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B10794

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due July 2, 2015, but it was not filed. This court notified 

appellant’s counsel of the deficiency and subsequently granted counsel an extension of time until 

August 31, 2015, (60 days after the original due date) to file the brief. Our order advised counsel, 

Arden J. Morley, that no further extensions of time would be granted absent a motion that 

demonstrated extraordinary circumstances and provided reasonable assurance that the brief 

would be filed by the requested deadline. Neither the brief nor an extension of time has been 

filed. 

We order Arden J. Morley to file appellant’s brief by September 11, 2015. If the brief 

is not filed by the date ordered, the court will abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial 

court for a hearing to determine whether appellant or counsel has abandoned the appeal. Counsel 

may also be ordered to appear before this court to show cause why he should not be held in 

contempt for failing to comply with the court’s order. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 611 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 611

      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 24 (legislative day, March 23), 1995

 Mr. Bradley (for himself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
the time limitation of section 13 of the Federal Power Act, the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC 
Project No. 9401 is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of section 13 and the 
Commission's procedures under such section, to extend until August 3, 
1999, the time required for the licensee to commence the construction 
of such project. This section shall take effect for the project upon 
the expiration of the extension (issued by the Commission under section 
13) of the period required for commencement of construction of such 
project.
                                 <all>
```
(see attached scope of accreditation for fields of testing and accredited test methods)

Print Date: 12/21/2010 

This is to signify that

PROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC. 

2710 WEST 5TH AVENUE 

EUGENE, OREGON 97402 

Testing Laboratory TL-280 

has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria for Testing Laboratories (AC89), has demonstrated 

ANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005, General criteria for the competence of testing and calibration laboratori

accredited, commencing November 11, 2010, for the test methods listed in the approved scope of accreditation

 Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.  Vice President President 
Professional Service Industries, Inc. TL-280 

 November 11, 2010  Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E

President 

Print Date: 12/21/2010 Professional Service Industries, Inc. 2710 W 5th Ave. DirectorEugene, OR 97402 

FIELDS OF TESTING ACCREDITED TEST METHODS 

Wood and wood-based products ASTM Standards D 143, D 198, D 905, D 1037, D 1101, D 1761

D 2718, D 3043, D 4442, D 4688, D 4761, D 5055, D 5516, D 60and E 1333; UBC Standards 23-1 and 23-2; United States DepaCommerce Product Standards PS-1 and PS-2; ANSI/HPVA StanFTM 1-83; ANSI A208.1 and 208.2
Exhibit 10.20  




  



	 	 	May 8, 2003







Michael T. Philion

529 Briarwood Drive

Elverson PA 19607 


Dear
Mike: 


        With
reference to your employment agreement (the "Employment Agreement") with EnerSys, Inc. (the  "Company"), dated November 9, 2000,
pursuant to which you are currently employed as Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, we confirm that effective as of April 1, 2003, your salary provided for in Section 3 of the Employment Agreement has been increased to $335,000. 



        Except
as expressly set forth in the letter, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 



	 	 	ENERSYS INC.
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	 	/s/  JOHN D. CRAIG      
 John D. Craig

Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer