alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02514]



[[Page 8682]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--DP24-031, Epidemiologic Cohort 
Study of Interstitial Cystitis.
    Date: April 10, 2024.
    Time: 10 a.m.-6 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference/Web Conference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Catherine Barrett, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop S106-3, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341-3717. Telephone: (404) 718-7664; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b38391a09091e0f0f3b181f18551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="337071524141564747735057501d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-02514 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0673

_________________

CASCADE COUNTY,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

MONTANA PETROLEUM TANK

RELEASE COMPENSATION BOARD,

 Defendant, Appellee,

 and Cross Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause 

appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and 

including September 25, 2020, within which to file Appellant’s reply and answer to 

cross-appeal brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 20 2020

08/20/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0673
#### Howard BAUGUS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27861.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1955.

*355No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin for the State.

PER CURIAM.

.The offense is cattle theft; the punishment, 5 years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, C. Jayson Brentlinger, hereby certify
that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Circuit
Research Labs, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained
in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ C. Jayson Brentlinger
                                        --------------------------
                                        C. Jayson Brentlinger
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Circuit Research Labs, Inc.
                                        April 29, 2003




This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSB/A pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
EXHIBIT 23.2



<PAGE>


                              CONSENT OF ATTORNEYS


Reference is made to the Registration Statement of CEL-SCI Corporation, File
#333-160794, whereby the Company proposes to sell shares of its common stock
from time-to-time at prevailing market prices. Reference is also made to Exhibit
5 included as part of this report, and included by reference as an exhibit to
the Registration Statement, relating to the validity of the securities proposed
to be issued and sold.

We hereby consent to the use of our opinion concerning the validity of the
securities proposed to be issued and sold.



HART & TRINEN

/s/ William T. Hart

September 10, 2010

















Cel-Sci Exh 23 Atty consent 12-8-10
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 20

- 00 109

- CV



### ________________

JAMES T. BENFIELD, GENESIS ENERGY, LLC, GENE SIS ENERGY,

L.P., and DAVISON TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. , Appellant s

V.

DEZMON SIMPSON and YULONDA ELDRIDGE , Appellee s

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 136 th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D

- 199,677

___________________________________________________ _____________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

James Benfield, Genesis Energy, LLC, Genesis Energy, L.P., and Davison

Transportation Services, Inc. , Appellant s , and Dezmon Simpson and Yulonda

Eldridge , Appellees, filed a joint motion to vacate the trial court ’ s judgment and

remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with their

settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B) . We grant the motion, set

aside the trial court ’ s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand the case to2 the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties ’

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(d)

.

VACATED AND REMANDED

.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER

Justice

Submitted on December 21, 2021

Opinion Delivered June 9, 2022

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Situation in and in Relation to Burma

On February 10, 2021, by Executive Order 14014, I declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in and in relation to Burma.

The situation in and in relation to Burma, and in particular the February 1, 2021 coup, in which the military overthrew the democratically elected civilian government of Burma and unjustly arrested and detained government leaders, politicians, human rights defenders, journalists, and religious leaders, thereby rejecting the will of the people of Burma as expressed in elections held in November 2020 and undermining the country's democratic transition and rule of law, continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on February 10, 2021, must continue in effect beyond February 10, 2024. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14014 with respect to the situation in and in relation to Burma.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2024-02844

Billing code 3395-F4-P
#### Ellis WEAVER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 38328.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 26, 1966.

Rehearing Denied March 23, 1966.

A. L. Lowery, Marion G. Holt, Nacog-doches, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is felony theft; the punishment, 10 years.

The record has now been perfected, and our prior opinions are withdrawn.

The sole question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to establish appellant’s guilt as a principal to the taking.

Appellant resided in a rural portion of Nacogdoches County, and had known Mr. Martin, the injured party, for a number of years and had often visited in his home. Appellant’s sister, a woman 35 years of age, had resided in Jefferson County for a number of years and had had no contact with Mr. Martin since she was a child. Martin was 84 years old and had poor eyesight. Appellant’s sister came to Nacogdoches County for a visit, and appellant took her and her children to visit Mr. Martin. While appellant and Martin sat on the front porch talking, appellant’s sister, under the guise of getting some water for her children, en*810tered Martin’s home and retrieved Martin’s billfold from its hiding place over a door sill. Shortly thereafter, the group left, whereupon Martin became suspicious, went to look for his billfold, found it gone and reported the theft to the officers. Appellant and his sister were apprehended the same day, and approximately $475.00 of currency, which Martin identified as part of that taken from him, was recovered from appellant’s person.

Appellant’s sister, who was found by the trial court to be an accomplice as a matter of law, testified that she was in dire financial straits and that appellant had instructed her to steal Martin’s billfold and that prior to their visit appellant told her where it might be found in his house. We have concluded that since the taking occurred under the circumstances hereinbe-fore set forth, the facts constitute sufficient corroboration of the accomplice’s testimony. Morgan v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 187, 346 S.W.2d 116.

While testifying in his own behalf, appellant admitted all the salient facts set forth above, but denied that he had told his sister where she might find Martin’s money or that he instructed her to steal the same while he engaged Martin in conversation. He admits that he and his sister divided the money without counting it shortly after they left the Martin home and admits that he had bought three new tires for his pickup and a pair of shoes before he was apprehended by the officers.

We have concluded that even though appellant’s confession does not recite that he and his sister agreed to steal Martin’s money prior to their visit to the Martin home, the jury were nevertheless authorized to conclude from the facts set forth above that appellant was a principal. Lesley v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 601, 331 S.W. 2d 58.

Finding the evidence sufficient to support the conviction and no reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Rahim Rayani, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 29, 2006
                                           /s/ Rahim Rayani
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Rahim Rayani
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           Chief Financial Officer
RE: FE corrections

Giedrius Ambrozaitis 

to: 

Alan Stout, John Cabaniss 

06/15/2011 02:52 PM 

Show Details 

Alan -

Thanks for sharing - I've circulated it to Alliance members and I'll get back to you if they see anything.

Giedrius

Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers

(248) 915-8836

From: Stout.Alan@epamail.epa.gov [Stout.Alan@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 9:19 AM 

To: Giedrius Ambrozaitis; John Cabaniss 

Subject: FE corrections 

 Giedrius and John, 

We finalized the fuel economy labeling rule last month and found that there were a few things that we need to 

correct. Attached is a file with a variety of adjustments to the regulations to address these concerns. These 

should be rather self-explanatory, but feel free to ask questions if any of this needs explanation. Our goal is to 

include these changes in the upcoming final rule for heavy-duty greenhouse gas emissions. With the goal of 

finalizing all this within the next two months or so, it would be good to give people a chance to look this over soon 

to make sure we get it right. 

Let us know if you see anything that needs further attention. 

Thanks much. 

Alan 

_______________ 

Alan Stout 

U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

2000 Traverwood Dr. 

Ann Arbor, MI 48105 

734-214-4805 

734-214-4816 (fax) 

stout.alan@epa.gov 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\astout\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web6476.htm 7/8/2011
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of OnScreen Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company"), on Form 10-QSB of the quarter ended June 30, 2007, I hereby certify
      solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





OnScreen
      Technologies, Inc.





Dated
      this 14thday of
      November 2007


By: /s/
      C ynthia
      M.
      Wilson


Cynthia
      M. Wilson


Interim
      Chief Financial Officer
#### Gerald V. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30958.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 11, 1959.

Schlesinger, Goodstein & Semaan, by Fred A. Semaan, San Antonio, for appellant.

Charles J. Lieck, Jr., Dist. Atty., Norma Lee Fink, Asst. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the possession of barbiturates; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The sole question presented for review is the authority of the Judge of County Court at Law No. 2 of Bexar County to issue a search warrant. Appellant contends that since Art. 33, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P., which defines who are magistrates, names the County Judge but does not name Judges of the County Courts at Law, the warrant in the instant case is void.

Recently in Ex parte Melton, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 563, 279 S.W.2d 362, we had a kindred question and there analyzed the act which created the County Court at Law of Hidalgo and held that by the passage of such act the legislature intended to and did create a county court to be known as the County Court at Law.

We hold that “the county judge” as used in Art. 33, V.A.C.C.P., includes judges of County Courts at Law created and given jurisdiction ordinarily vested in County Courts and that the judge of said court is a magistrate and is authorized to issue a search warrant.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Douglas, Admx., Appellee, *v.*Daniels et al., Appellants. 

*(No. 27357*

Decided January 11, 1939.)

*Messrs. Paulin $ Frasier*and *Messrs.- Harrison <& Ma/rshman,*for appellee.

*Mr. Harold U. Daniels,*for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Day, J., not participating.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D., the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Telik, Inc. (the Company), and Wendy Wee, Vice President, Finance and Controller of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

1.The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2.The information contained in
the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 16thday of May, 2011.



|                                     |  |  |  |                                             
|------------------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|/s/ MICHAEL M. WICK                  |  |  |  | /s/ WENDY WEE                               
|Michael M. Wick, M.D., Ph.D.         |  |  |  | Wendy Wee                                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Vice President, Finance and Controller      
|(Principal Executive Officer)        |  |  |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Telik, Inc.
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2014 - 0570 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM094AD

TR A WL 110 --- 8 / 31 / 07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   11-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           16584
<SECURITIES>                                     43000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      29425
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 89009
<PP&E>                                          202059
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  291068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         50
<COMMON>                                         10280
<OTHER-SE>                                      291068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    291068
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                              299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      299
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  13875
<INCOME-TAX>                                     13875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13875
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13875
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>