alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Presidential Associates I Limited
Partnership (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-KSB/A for the annual period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date
indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Partnership.






Date:
      September 3, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Eggert
      DagbjartssonEggert
      DagbjartssonChief
      Executive Officer andPresident
 Date:
      September 3, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Andrew
      PragueAndrew
      PragueChief
      Financial Officer
#### Otis HINES, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 2, 1959.

Alfred M. Carroll, Louisville, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., Walter Herd-man, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Otis Hines, a man seventy-nine years of age, was convicted of the common law misdemeanor of committing a common nuisance and sentenced to twelve months in jail. KRS 431.075.

We have examined the evidence and briefs of counsel, and find no error in the trial. Commonwealth v. Hamilton, 237 Ky. 682, 36 S.W.2d 342; Nuchols v. Commonwealth, 312 Ky. 171, 226 S.W.2d 796, 13 A.L.R.2d 1478; Case v. Commonwealth, 313 Ky. 374, 231 S.W.2d 86.

The judgment is affirmed. Criminal Code of Practice, § 348.
EXHIBIT 23.1




                          Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors
Cytogen Corporation:


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos. 33-30595, 33-52574, 33-57004, 33-63321, 333-00431,  333-04679,  333-27673,
333-27673,  333-48454,  333-58384,  333-59718,  333-75304)  on Form  S-8 and the
registration  statements  (Nos.  33-35140,   33-77396,   333-43809,   333-83215,
333-34550,  333-33436,  333-72226,  333-100315) on Form S-3 and the registration
statements  (Nos.  333-68759,  333-67947,  333-67947)  on  Form  S-1 of  Cytogen
Corporation of our report dated January 31, 2003,  which report is based in part
on a report of other auditiors,  with respect to the consolidated  balance sheet
of Cytogen Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related
consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year then ended,  which report  appears in the  December  31,  2002  annual
report on Form 10-K of Cytogen Corporation.


Our report refers to our audit of the  adjustments  that were applied to restate
the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements,  as more fully described in
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. However, we were not engaged to
audit,  review,  or apply  any  procedures  to the  2001  and 2000  consolidated
financial statements other than with respect to such adjustments.




                                         /s/ KPMG LLP
Princeton, New Jersey
March 28, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 10105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02994]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, February 15, 2024.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7B, 1775 Duke Street (All visitors 
must use Diagonal Road Entrance) Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Board Briefing, Share Insurance Fund Quarterly Report.
    2. Final Interpretive Ruling and Policy Statement, Minority 
Depository Institution Preservation Program.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks, 
Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-02994 Filed 2-9-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
## MISSOURI RIVER BASIN

2012 1st Q 2ndQ 3rd Q 4th Q 

### Total 2011 Total Local No
. 27 74,399 108,224 16,088 63 ,524 262 ,235 229,451 83 269,763 749 ,865 228,956 418,084 1 , 666,668 1,249,559 344,162 858 ,089 245,044 481 , 608 1,928,903 1,479,010



## 2013 1st Q 2nd Q 

### Local No
. 27 12,287 35,920 83 299 , 533 694.448 311,820 730 ,368
Exhibit 99.2

Co-Registrant (Commission File Number 000-30761):

UbiquiTel Inc.
One West Elm Street
Suite 400
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

Co-Registrant (Commission File Number 333-39950):

UbiquiTel Operating Company
One West Elm Street
Suite 400
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James J. Volk, Chief Financial Officer of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel
Operating Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating
Company.

| |  | UBIQUITEL INC.                       
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  |                                      
| |  | /s/JAMES J. VOLK                     
| |  | James J. Volk
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | UBIQUITEL OPERATING COMPANY          
| |  | /s/JAMES J. VOLK                     
| |  | James J. Volk
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | November 13, 2002                    

---
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys, McCullough and Senior Judge Bumgardner

EARNEST COLLINS

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0014-13-3 PER CURIAM

APRIL 23, 2013

LEBO MINING CO. AND

 COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Stephen W. Mullins, on brief), for appellant.

(S. Vernon Priddy III; Sarah Y.M. Himmel; Two Rivers Law Group, 

P.C., on brief), for appellees.

Earnest Collins (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission

awarding him medical benefits pursuant to Code § 65.2-603 for the occupational disease of coal 

worker’s pneumoconiosis and affirming the deputy commissioner’s denial of compensation for 

the occupational disease pursuant to Code § 65.2-504(A)(1). Claimant contends the commission 

erred by denying him compensation under Code § 65.2-504(A)(1).

We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is 

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final 

opinion. See Collins v. Lebo Mining Co., JCN VA020-0000-4732 (Dec. 3, 2012). We dispense 

with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

 * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

UNPUBLISHED
#### Woodrow SALYERS, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 5, 1957.

O. J. Cockrell, Jackson, for appellant.

*770Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen. and William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of selling alcoholic beverages in local option territory, resulting in a fine of $100 and a 30 day jail sentence. He moves for an appeal on the grounds: (1) the trial court should have granted a continuance of the trial; (2) there was not sufficient proof of the time when the alleged offense took place; and (3) there was no competent evidence to show that Breathitt County is in local option territory.

 We have considered each of these grounds, and are of the opinion that no reversible error is shown.

The motion for appeal is denied, and the judgment stands affirmed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 21
- 00664
- CV

In re David Johnson

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relat or has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency

r e lief. Having reviewed the petition and the record p rovided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(k)(1)(A) (requiring relator to provide “a certified or s worn copy of any order complained of, or any other d ocument showing the matter complained of”) ; In re Smith , No. 03

- 14

- 00478

- CV, 2014 WL 4079922, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Aug. 13, 2014, orig. proceeding ) (denying mandamus relief when relator failed to prov i de sufficient record from which to evalua te her claim for mandamus relief); In re Le , 335 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, orig. proceeding ) ( “ This court cannot make a sound decision based on an incomplete picture. ” ). Furthermore, re l ator may still pursue the adequate remedy of a de novo hearing before the referring court. See Tex. Fam. Code § 201.015(a); see also Olenick

v. City of Austin , No. 03

- 14

- 00339

- CV, 2015 WL 4077245, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Austin2 June 30, 2015, pet. denied) (cauti o n ing mandamus relief unavailable when an adequate remedy by appeal exists).

__ _____________ ________ ___________________ Darlene Byrne , Chief Justice Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly Filed: December 17 , 2021
EXHIBIT
31.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Andrew
Prague, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Presidential Associates I
Limited Partnership;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this  report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:      
April 14,
2008                                                                                         /s/ Andrew
Prague


Andrew
Prague


Chief Financial
Officer
**EXHIBIT 24.9**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**(Annual Report on Form 10-K)**

The undersigned, an officer and/or director of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc., constitutes and appoints Nicholas Konidaris, Paul Oldham and Kerry Mustoe, and eachof them, his or her true and lawful attorney and agent to do any and all acts and things and execute in his or her name as an officer or director of the Company the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 28, 2009 and any andall amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm all that said attorneys and agentsand each of them shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Any one of said attorneys or agents shall have, and may exercise, all powers conferred. 

Dated: May 14, 2009.
EXHIBIT 3.1

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED

BYLAWS

OF

ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION

a Delaware corporation

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors the (Board) of Entravision Communications Corporation has approved and adopted the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Entravision Communications Corporation (the
Bylaws).

WHEREAS, this First Amendment to the Bylaws (this Amendment) is made effective as of May 8, 2009.

1. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that effective as of May 8, 2009, Section 3.2 of the Bylaws be and hereby is amended to read in its entirety as
set forth below. All capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment shall be defined as set forth in the Bylaws.

3.2
Number, Term and Classes. The Board shall consist of not less than six (6) nor more than eleven (11) members, as shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board. Except as provided in the Certificate of
Incorporation, there shall be one (1) class of directors, all of which shall be elected by the holders of the Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, voting together as a single class, as provided in the Certificate of
Incorporation.

2. All Other Provisions of the Bylaws Remain the Same. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all other terms, conditions
and obligations contained in the Bylaws shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

To record the adoption of this Amendment by
the Board effective May 8, 2009, Entravision Communications Corporation has caused its authorized officer to execute the same.



ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ Walter F. UlloaName:

Walter F. UlloaTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the Company), I, Mel F. Wesley, Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                           
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 8, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Mel F. Wesley                         
|                      |  |     |  | Mel F. Wesley                             
|                      |  |     |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Ex parte Erwin L. BROWN.

No. 36646.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 5, 1964.

Harold Seay, Galveston, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*896BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an original application for a writ of habeas corpus.

It has now been made known to this Court that relator is no longer confined, and the question raised by his application has become moot.

The application for writ of habeas corpus is ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 583 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 583

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
     documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for two vessels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 21 (legislative day, March 16), 1995

  Mr. Stevens introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
     documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for two vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, 
United States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
App. U.S.C. 883), as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with a coastwise endorsement for each of the vessels 
RESOLUTION (Serial Number 77NS8701) and PERSERVERANCE (Serial Number 
77NS8901).
                                 <all>
```
## Comments in Response to ''Final rule; request for comments" Docket: FAA-2014-0336 Directorate Identifier 2013-SW-063-AD Comments have beenreceived inresponse to: "Final rule; request for comments," Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. (Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine 

## if additional action is warranted Once you have madeyour determination, please fill in the commenter(s) name(s) andcheck the appropriate response below. Include additional iriformationfollowing the appropriate response, 

## if

necessary. Then includeyour name and the date in the spacesprovided, and return it to the AD directoratefocal. The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docketthat we received from: 

### .::(Ltt/e 

## f?.,cJ..o.ro) 1 

## Tro.hs[M\c,dq (Please check one)



# ~hese comments have 

### not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration

or change ofthis AD. 

# D These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of additional regulatory action. 

### (SEEAirworthinessDirectives Manual F

AA-IR-M-8040.1 FORADDITIONALACTION.) 

# Akrldd/- Name: 

# !2/7/!f

**~I** Date:
(This form is part ofthe official docket file for this AD action.)

Rev 0 (9/08)
#### Vulcan Corp., Appellee, *v.*Westheimer & Co. et al.; Olberding, Appellant.

(No. 27435

Decided March 1, 1939.)

*Messrs. Miller, Searl <& Fitch,*for appellee.

*Messrs. Gallagher, Dorr é Manley,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right he, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Myers, J., not participating.
## 2001 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

6-27-2001 

# M aldon a do v

. H ou s t oun

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al :

D ocke t 97-1893

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2001

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2001 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" M aldon a do v

. H ous t oun " (2001). 2001 D e cisio n s

. P ape r 140. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2001/140

### Filed June 27, 2001

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 97-1893

EDWIN MALDONADO; MARIA DELORES MALDONADO, individually and as next friends of Ana Maldonado, Pablo Maldonado, Edwin Maldonado, Rey Maldonado, Y esenia Maldonado, and Jose Maldonado, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; MARIA ORTIZ; MICHAEL ORT IZ, individually and as next friends of Julie Ortiz, Mi chael Ortiz, and Angelica Ortiz, and on behalf of all oth er similarly situated; KENSINGTON WELFARE RIGHTS UNION; PHILADELPHIA WELFARE RIGHTS ORGANIZATION, on behalf of themselves and their members; TRAVELER'S AID SOCIETY OF PHILADELPHIA, individually and on behalf of its clients

v.
FEATHER O. HOUSTOUN, Secretary of the PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE; DON JOSE STOVALL, Executive Director of the PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF ASSISTANCE, both in their official capacities,

Appellants
STAPLETON, ROSENN, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge, United States Court of International T rade*

___________________________________________________ ______________ * The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Judge, United Stat es Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.

### ORDER

The motion for attorneys' fees and costs in the abo ve matter is granted according to the Opinion Sur Moti on for Attorneys' Fees and Costs hereto attached.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Max Rosenn Circuit Judge

Dated: June 27, 2001

A True Copy: Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2