alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          93,289                  28,213
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,643                  58,724
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,978)                 (3,505)
<INVENTORY>                                         30                      41
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               182,630                 112,287
<PP&E>                                         136,832                 120,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                (67,637)                (60,309)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 394,304                 264,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          114,161                  74,315
<BONDS>                                          2,923                   3,419
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           455                     400
<OTHER-SE>                                     276,715                 186,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   394,304                 264,925
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,225                 140,423
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  127,897                  88,240
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,076                   1,419
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,296                 (1,078)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,635)                   9,284
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,285)                   7,949
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,350)                   1,335
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,350)                   1,335
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)                    0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)                    0.03


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23    [d71793x23002.gif]        Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  The Board of Directors Merchants Bancshares, Inc.:  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-41051), Form S-3D (No. 333-20375), Form S-8 (No. 333-34869), Form S-8 (No. 333-34871), and Form S-8 (No. 333-18845) as amended by Post Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8/A, of Merchants Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Merchants Bancshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Merchants Bancshares, Inc.  /s/ KPMG LLP Albany, NY March 16, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
                to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of OnScreen Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-QSB of the quarter ended June 30, 2006, I hereby certify
solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
     or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company

OnScreen Technologies, Inc.

By: /s/ Charles R. Baker
    -------------------------------------
               Charles R. Baker
        Chief Executive Officer/Director

Dated this 14th day of August 2006
#### Cecil KING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 36791.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 17, 1964.

Robert D. Peterson, Reagan & Welch, by Jack Welch, Marlin, for appellant.

Thos. Bartlett, Jr., County Atty., Marlin, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDonald, judge.

Appellant was convicted of murder and given a term of twenty-five (25) years in the state penitentiary.

It has been made known to this court by proper affidavit that appellant died on or about May 12, 1964, after having perfected his appeal. The death of the appellant deprives this court of jurisdiction of the appeal.

Therefore our prior opinion in this cause is withdrawn and the appeal abated.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-39646, 33-39648, 33-88470, 33-88472, 333-18869, 333-70561, 333-76264 on
Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-109681 and 333-116314 on Form
S-3 of our report dated September 28, 2005, relating to the financial
statements of Parlex Corporation, appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Parlex Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2005.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
September 28, 2005


<PAGE>  64
1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1776

___________ Sally Spaulding, formerly known as * Sally Tobelmann, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Department of Health and Human * Services, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant, * * Social Security Administration, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: August 4, 2005 Filed: August 9, 2005

___________ Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Sally Spaulding appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment, and its adverse grant of a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) motion,-2- in her action brought under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehab Act). Having conducted de novo review, see Peebles v. Potter , 354 F.3d 761, 765 (8th Cir. 2004) (summary judgment standard of review); Ferris, Baker Watts, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, LLP , 395 F.3d 851, 853 (8th Cir. 2005) (Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal standard of review), we agree with the district court that Spaulding’s retaliation claims were not administratively exhausted, seeWallin v. Minn. Dep’t of Corr. , 153 F.3d 681, 688 (8th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 526 U.S. 1004 (1999); and that the Social Security Administration met its duty under the Rehab Act by restructuring Spaulding’s job, see Peebles , 354 F.3d at 767. Spaulding cannot seek reversal by asserting ineffective assistance of counsel. See Glick v. Henderson , 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988) (defendant has no constitutional or statutory right to effective assistance of counsel in civil case). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 4.4    
    


 
 

CONFIRMATION NOTICE AND ELECTION FORM    
    


[Date]



[Name
and Address of Subscriber] 


	RE:
	Your
subscription(s) for Units of Iroquois Bio-Energy Company, LLC 



Dear
[Name of Subscriber]: 


        We
hereby notify you that because you subscribed to purchase Units of Iroquois Bio-Energy Company, LLC prior to receiving the enclosed amended prospectus dated
                        , 2004 (amending and restating the prior prospectus dated September 23, 2003), you have the right to
withdraw your subscription and receive a refund of your investment, together
with any related interest earned after September 30, 2003. 


        Before
deciding whether to confirm or withdraw your subscription, you should read the entire amended prospectus, and the documents referred to by it, carefully in order to fully
understand our business, the offering and the units we are offering. Please indicate below how you wish to proceed (check either "A" or "B" below): 



	[    ] A.	 	The undersigned hereby elects to confirm the subscription(s) based upon the amended prospectus, and to have all prior subscription payments and promissory notes treated in the manner described in the amended
prospectus for new subscriptions.
	

[    ] B.	
 	

The undersigned hereby elects to withdraw the subscription(s). Please return all subscription payments and promissory notes to me at the address set forth in my subscription agreement (or provide a substitute address here:
                                         
       ).





        If this form is not completed and received by us by                        , 2004, your subscription will
automatically be
cancelled. In order to register your election, you must return this completed form to at the following address or fax number:

                                         
                                          
                                          
                                         
                
 


        If
you have any questions regarding the confirmation process, do not hesitate to contact Keith A. Gibson, our Assistant Vice President-Chief Operating Officer, at the above address or
fax number or at the following phone number: (219) 866-5990. 


        IF YOU ELECT TO CONFIRM YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, YOUR ELECTION TO IS IRREVOCABLE. IF YOU HAVE NOT SUBMITTED FULL PAYMENT, YOU WILL REMAIN BOUND TO PAY THE REMAINING 80%
OF THE TOTAL SUBSCRIPTION PRICE UPON WRITTEN NOTICE FROM US. WE WILL RETURN YOUR INVESTMENT ONLY IF WE REJECT YOUR SUBSCRIPTION OR WE CANNOT SATISFY THE CONDITIONS TO BREAKING
ESCROW.



	Individuals:

    
 Signature of Investor

    
 Print Name

    
 Signature of Joint Investor	 	Entities:

    
 Name of Entity

    
 Authorized Signature

    
 Print Name





	    
 Print Name	 	Its:	    

	

Date:	

    
	
 	

Date:	

    














QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.4


CONFIRMATION NOTICE AND ELECTION FORM
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 9131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02824]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service (operating as AmeriCorps) gives notice of the 
following meeting:

TIME AND DATE: Friday, March 1, 2024, 2:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m. (ET).

PLACE: AmeriCorps, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20525. For health 
and safety reasons, this will be a virtual meeting.
    <bullet> To register for the meeting, please use this link: https://americorps.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_d5hKOeCqT-2xpGJiPiml3Q.
    <bullet> Webinar ID: 160 953 1136 Passcode: 834402.
    <bullet> To participate by phone, call toll free: (833) 568-8864.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
I. Opening Remarks by the Chair
II. CEO Remarks
III. Review of the CEO Letter and Outcome
IV. Oversight, Governance, and Audit Committee Report
V. Actions From the Board
VI. Spotlight: Tribal and Native Grantees
VII. Public Comment
VIII. Chair's Closing Remarks and Adjournment

    Members of the public who would like to comment on the business of 
the Board may do so in writing or virtually. Submit written comments to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2c0cdc3d0c6e2c3cfc7d0cbc1cdd0d2d18cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9dbd6d8cbddf9d8d4dccbd0dad6cbc9ca97ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a> with the subject line: ``Comments for March 1, 
2024, AmeriCorps Board Meeting'' no later than 5:00 p.m. (ET) February 
23, 2024. Individuals who would like to comment during the meeting will 
be given instructions for signing up when they join the meeting. 
Comments should be limited to two minutes.
    AmeriCorps provides reasonable accommodation upon request to 
individuals with disabilities, where needed.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Heather Leinenbach by telephone: 
(202) 489-5266 or by email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff9d909e8d9bbf9e929a8d969c908d8f8cd1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="284a47495a4c6849454d5a414b475a585b064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>.

Fernando Laguarda,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024-02824 Filed 2-7-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Andrew H. Meyers, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Langer, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Langer, Inc.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 30, 2005



/s/ANDREW H. MEYERSAndrew H. Meyers, President and
Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6133

AVENGER DON RIDGEWAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RANDALL LEE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-02-896-5-H)

Submitted: May 13, 2004 Decided: May 19, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Avenger Don Ridgeway, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge,

III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Avenger Don Ridgeway, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Ridgeway has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1458 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to exempt qualifying law school 

students participating in legal clinics or externships from the application 

of the conflict of interest rules under section 205 of such title. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2011 

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to exempt qualifying 

law school students participating in legal clinics or 

externships from the application of the conflict of interest 

rules under section 205 of such title. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Law Student Clinic 

5 Participation Act of 2011’’. 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1458 IH

1 SEC. 2. LAW STUDENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST EXEMP2 TION. 

3 Section 205 of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(j) Subsections (a) and (b) do not apply to a law 

6 student or legal clinic staff member participating in the 

7 legal clinic or externship of an accredited law school, with 

8 respect to a matter within the scope of the clinic or 

9 externship, unless— 

10 ‘‘(1) the student or staff has participated per11 sonally and substantially in the matter as a Govern12 ment employee or special Government employee 

13 through decision, approval, disapproval, recommen14 dation, the rendering of advice, investigation, or oth15 erwise; or 

16 ‘‘(2) the matter is pending in the department or 

17 agency of the Government in which the student or 

18 staff is serving.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

20 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

21 take effect upon the expiration of the 60-day period begin22 ning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
#### L. W. BEASLEY, Appellant, v. Joe BARSHOP, Individually and d/b/a Fruit Distributing Company and Banana Distributing Company, Appellee.

No. 13849.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 20, 1961.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 17, 1962.

*928Perkins, Floyd, Davis & Oden, Alice, for appellant.

Lang, Byrd, Cross, Ladon & Oppenheimer, Stanley D. Rosenberg, San Antonio, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

This is a venue case which concerns Section 5 of Article 1995, Vernon’s Tex.Civ. Stats. Plaintiff, Joe Barshop, filed suit in Bexar County and the trial court overruled L. W. Beasley’s plea to be sued in Jim Wells County.

Barshop filed suit on January 16, 1961. The petition asserted an action upon a written sworn account. After defendant timely filed his plea of privilege, Barshop on February 13, 1961, filed his controverting affidavit and adopted the allegations of his petition. Thereafter, Barshop filed a first amended and a second amended petition. These later pleadings relied not only upon a sworn account but also prayed for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage which, according to Barshop) fixed venue in Bexar County. The controverting affidavit was never amended to allege, include, or adopt the new grounds, different facts and additional relief contained in the amended petitions. We are, therefore, concerned only with the venue facts asserted and raised by the plea of privilege and the controverting affidavit, without regard to the subsequent amendments not incorporated into the controverting affidavit. Pelton v. Powell, Tex.Civ.App., 196 S.W.2d 46; 1 McDonald, Texas Civil Practice, § 4.50; Clark, Venue in Civil Actions, 235.

Barshop did, however, sufficiently prove a contract in writing under Exception 5, Article 1995. He proved that Beasley bought produce from him, as evidenced by invoices delivered at the time of sale. The first of these invoices was for produce which showed a charge made to Beasley in the amount of $1,370.41. Written on the invoice delivered to Beasley’s representative, were the words: “All bills payable at San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas.” The invoice shows that the produce was billed to Beasley and accepted by Israel “Lili” Sanchez, who was sent to San Antonio to receive the produce for defendant, and that he signed the invoice upon receipt thereof. This was a written proposal accepted in writing, and sufficiently met the rule for a contract in writing obligating the defendant to perform the obligation sued upon in Bexar County. Burtis v. Butler Bros., 148 Tex. 543, 226 S.W.2d 825; Nelson v. Dunigan Tool & Supply Co., Tex.Civ.App., 265 S.W.2d 680; Dowdell v. Ginsberg, Tex.Civ.App., 244 S.W.2d 265; Clark, Venue in Civil Actions, 40.42.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR MERISEL, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          44,678
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  191,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,684
<INVENTORY>                                    392,557
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               625,120
<PP&E>                                         114,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 731,039
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          434,576
<BONDS>                                        281,466
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           301
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   731,039
<SALES>                                      5,522,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,522,824
<CGS>                                        5,233,570
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,233,570
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               295,021
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                42,033
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,431
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (138,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,539
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (140,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (140,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.68)
        

</TABLE>