alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                  AS CREATED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned officer of Stratagene Corporation ("Stratagene" or the
"Company") hereby certifies that:

      (i) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"); and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: November 12, 2004             By:  /s/ Reginald P. Jones
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Reginald P. Jones
                                         Senior Vice President and Chief
                                           Financial Officer

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act.
In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or
otherwise subject to the liability of that section and (B) shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Stratagene and will be retained by Stratagene and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
You are here: AirFire> SmartFire Fire Information System

Project Lead / Contact: Sim Larkin, USFS V2 developed with funding from USFS FAM

Many thanks: P. Lahm 

# SmartFire Fire Information System

The SmartFire fire information system is a framework foraggregating, associating, and reconciling wildland fire information from disparate sources. The current version of SmartFire is Version 2, which includes significant advan cements to data processing, associating, and reconciliation algorithms. SmartFire v2 (SF2) can use any number of data sources, associ ating and reconciling their information to avoid double counting of fires, a nd selectively utilizing the best pieces of data from each source.



### USE SmartFire v2 is in use for developing the 2011 U.S. EPA’s National Emissions Inventory (NEI) for wildland fire. Previous versions of SmartFire were used in prior inventories, with SmartFi re v2 first used in the development of version 2 of the 2 008 U.S. EPA’s NEI. Currently, real-time smoke prediction systems across the U. S. use SmartFire v1 with a change over to SmartFire v2 p lanned for Spring 2013.



### A FRAMEWORK FOR RECONCILING FIRE INFORMATION SmartFire is fundamentally a platform or framework fo r performing the tasks of: Gathering fire information from disparate sources includ ing satellite systems and ground based systems, real-time a nd retrospective systems, and direct fire reports and ancillary d ata systems; Manipulating the fire information from a given source into a hierarchical fire data information structure; Associating fire information between difference sources to determine potential overlaps and duplications; and Reconciling fire information from multiple sources to p rovide a single data stream for use in fire emissions inven tories, fire models, and smoke and air quality models.
As a framework, SmartFire includes multiple options a nd settings that will influence the resulting output re conciled fire information data stream. Choices made as to which fire information source to use, which parameters to use, and which reconciliatio n algorithms to use will fundamentally affect the resulting information. For this reason, when referencing SmartFire data, it i s important to specify the full configuration utilized when this data was created. 

# AirFire understanding weather, climate, air quality, and wil dland fire 

### SmartFire Fire Information System | AirFire http://www.airfire.org/smartfire/

1 of 1 9/16/2015 10:06 AM
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnH. Jungbauer, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

 
| Dated: March 17, 2005 |   | By:                                                  | /s/ John H. Jungbauer |   |
|-----------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |   | John H. Jungbauer                                    |
|                  |   | Vice President, Finance and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 5920)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee, February 22, 2024, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. and February 23, 2024, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 21, 2023, 88 FR 244, Page 88404.                

This meeting will be amended to change the meeting times to 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. for both days. The entire meeting will be closed to the public, other than an open session on February 22, 2024 from 1:30 p.m. to 1:50 p.m.

                    The open session of the meeting will be virtual. Any interested person may file written comments with the committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice no later than 7 days prior to the meeting. The statement should include the name, address, telephone number and, when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the interested person. Individuals who need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify Dianne Babski, Associate Director, Division of Library Operations, National Library of Medicine at                     *babskid@mail.nih.gov.*                     The open session will be videocast and can be accessed from the NIH Videocast website at                     *https://videocast.nih.gov/​.*

Dated: January 25, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-01825 Filed 1-29-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,023
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,526
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,393
<INVENTORY>                                      6,287
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,844
<PP&E>                                           3,148
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,529
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,780
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,961
<SALES>                                         30,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,417
<CGS>                                           22,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,554
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,163)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,163)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.90)
        

</TABLE>
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Adkins, Appellant.

(No. 27405

Decided February 8, 1939.)

*Mr. Boy L. Henry,*prosecuting attorney, for appellee. '

*Mr. H. A. McGown,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not deemed to be filed for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: May
11, 2009



/s/ Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.President and Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.2(C)



 Exhibit 10.2(c) 

June 1, 2016 
 Altis Partners
(Jersey) Limited 
 2 Hill Street 

St Helier, Jersey 
 Channel
Islands JE2 4UA 
 Attention: Mr. Stephen Hedgecock 

Re: Management Agreement Renewals 

Dear Mr. Hedgecock: 
 We
are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2017 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	 Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 CMF Altis Partners Master Fund L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 Global Futures Fund Ltd. 



 

	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522
Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036 or fax to 866-428-9026. If you have any questions, I can be
reached at 212-296-6808 or contact Jack Yuen at 212-296-1320. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Patrick T. Egan

		 	 Patrick T. Egan

		 	 President and Director

	
	 ALTIS PARTNERS (JERSEY) LIMITED

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Zbigniew Hermaszewski /s/ Alex
Morgan



			
		
	 Print Name:
	 	
Zbigniew Hermaszewski & Alex Morgan        

	 PE/kg
STATE OF TE NNESSEE

DEPARTMENT O F ENVI RONM ENT AND CONSERVATION

WATER SUPPL Y

9th Floor, 4 01 C hurch Street

Nashville, Tennessee 37243-154 9



### APPLICATION TO TRANSFER PERMIT

Nam e an d Address o f Facility Nam e an d Address o f Ex istin g Own e r/ Op erato r

S t a t e C o un t y Perm i t Nu m b e r

WE LL ACT I VI T Y TYPE OF PERM I T LOCAT I ON

___ Br ine Disposal

___ I ndividual L a titude

___ E nhanced Recover y

___ Ar ea

___ Hy dr ocar bon Stor age

___ Nu m b er of Wells

L o n g i t u d e

Lease N a m e Well u m b e r

Nam e an d Address o f Facility Nam e an d Address o f Ex isting Own e r/ Op erato r



### Attach to th is applica t ion a w r itten agreemen t be tw een the existing and ne w permittee containing

a specif i c d a te for tran sfer of pe r m it r e spon s i bility, cove rage, and liability be tween them.

The new permittee mu s5t show evid ence of f i nancial res ponsibility by the submission of a surety

bond, or other adequate assurance, such as fina ncial s t a t ements or other materials acceptable to

the Division

Certifica t i o n

I cert i f y un de r t h e penal t y of l a w t h at I ha ve exam i n ed and am fa m i l i ar with th e in fo rmatio n su b m it ted in th is do cu m e n t an d all

at t achm e nt s and t h at

, based o n m y i nqui ry o f t h ose i n di vi d u al s i m m e di at el y resp on si bl e fo r obt ai ni n g t h e i n f o rm at i on, I bel i e ve th at

th e inform atio n is tru e , accurate, an d co m p lete. I am aware th at th ere are si gn ifican t p e n a lties for su b m ittin g false in fo rm at ion

, in clu d i n g th e po ssib ility o f fine or im p r iso n m en t.

Nam e and Offi ci al Tit l e (ple as e t y pe or p r int) Signature Date Sign ed

C N R D A 2 4 7 4
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-41346 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL TREVINO,

DefendantAppellant.

______________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-99-CR-536-1

______________________________________

July 25, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Samuel Trevino appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He argues that

the checkpoint operated by the Borde r Pat ro l was constitutionally inadequate. The checkpoint at

issue here is substantially similar to one that passed constitutional muster in United States v. VenegasSapien , 762 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1985). Trevino has not shown, and we cannot discern, any material

differences between the two checkpoints. Consequently, Trevino has failed to demonstrate error on

the part of the district court, and that court’s denial of Trevino’s motion to suppress is AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 9288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02726]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Meeting of the Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC) 
will hold a public meeting via telephone conference line on Wednesday, 
March 20, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alec Johnston, Office of National 
Public Liaison, at (202) 317-4299, or send an email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#04747166686d67686d656d776b6a446d76772a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6a6a3b4babfb5babfb7bfa5b9b896bfa4a5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a public meeting 
via conference call of the ETAAC will be held on Wednesday, March 20, 
2024, at 12:30 p.m. EDT. The purpose of the ETAAC is to provide 
continuing advice regarding the development and implementation of the 
IRS organizational strategy for electronic tax administration. ETAAC is 
an organized public forum for discussion of electronic tax 
administration issues such as prevention of identity theft and refund 
fraud. It supports the overriding goal that paperless filing should be 
the preferred and most convenient method of filing tax and information 
returns. ETAAC members convey the public's perceptions of IRS 
electronic tax administration activities, offer constructive 
observations about current or proposed policies, programs, and 
procedures, and suggest improvements. Please call or email Alec 
Johnston to confirm your attendance. Mr. Johnston can be reached at 
202-317-4299 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fdffaede3e6ecc3e6eee6fce0e1cfe6fdfca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</a> . Should you wish the ETAAC to 
consider a written statement, please call 202-317-4299 or email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c494b1a6a8ada788ada5adb7abaa84adb6b7eaa3abb2">[email protected]</a>.

    Dated: February 6, 2024.
John A. Lipold,
Designated Federal Official, Office of National Public Liaison, 
Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-02726 Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Billy Ray HARRIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 36785.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 1, 1964.

Lawrence R. Green, Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., C. M. Turling-ton, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, .Commissioner.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, thirty years.

*839The state’s evidence shows that the injured party, James Thurmond Hodges, was employed as night attendant at a Fina service station on Highway *77*in Carroll-ton, Dallas County, Texas. Hodges testified that on the night in question, while he was on duty, two men drove into the station in an automobile and then left. Some thirty minutes later the men returned to the station and, after purchasing some oil, again departed. On the second trip, appellant was recognized by the witness as the driver of the automobile. Later, appellant and his companion returned to the station, at which time appellant asked the witness for some “cigarette change” and handed him a five dollar bill. When the witness went into the station and opened the cash register to change the bill, appellant stuck his hand in his shirt and told the witness he “didn’t only want cigarette change, he wanted all of the money.” With his hand still inside his shirt appellant then proceeded to order the injured party and another man by the name of Gordon into a back room. While in the room the injured party, could hear money being taken from the cash register and when he came to the door appellant said: “Don’t get behind me, or you will get hurt.” .Appellant then shut the door to the back room, went outside, and drove off with his companion in the automobile. The injured party testified that on such occasion he was in fear of his life or bodily injury if he did not comply with appellant’s command and that between $95 and $100 was taken from the cash register, without his consent. He further testified that on the night in question the appellant and his companion were intoxicated.

The witness Joe Gordon, called by the state, testified that he was present at the station on the night in question and corroborated the testimony of the injured party as to the details of the robbery.

The state’s proof further shows that appellant was- arrested about a month after the robbery and, after being duly warned, made and signed a written confession in which he admitted having gone to the station on the night in question, with his companion, and committing the robbery.

Appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in his behalf.

The record presents no formal bills of exception and there are no objections to the court’s charge.

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. This contention we overrule.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.