alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted 
from the Balance Sheet and Statements of Income filed as part of
the report on Form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1996
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such report on 
Form 10KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,049,819

<SECURITIES>                                 2,076,158
<RECEIVABLES>                                  567,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    242,081
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,458,538
<PP&E>                                       2,704,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                 909,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,975,542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          342,336
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           779
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,382,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,975,542
<SALES>                                      2,519,908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,686,889
<CGS>                                          711,564
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,699,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                211,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,209
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            192,048
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   192,048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
#### Joe E. LUMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27857.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1955.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is enticing a minor female; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $300.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
#### George Leo WOCKENFUSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 37121.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 14, 1964.

Billy C. Powell, J. Robert Harris, Houston, for appellant.

Frank Briscoe, Dist. Atty., Carl E. F. Dally, Qetus A. Davis and Ray Montgomery, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, sixty days in jail and a fine of $200.00.

The testimony of three police officers reveals that appellant was intoxicated immediately after he was involved in an automobile collision while driving an automobile *940upon á public highway. An analysis of a blood specimen taken from appellant at his request showed an alcoholic content of .15 per cent by weight. The testimony further shows that such alcoholic content was indicative of intoxication.

Testifying in his own behalf, the appellant admitted that he was driving the automobile and had had four beers between 8:30 P.M. and 12 midnight, before the collision shortly after midnight, but he denied that he was intoxicated.

The jury resolved the issue of intoxication against the appellant, and the evidence is sufficient to support its verdict.

The only contentions urged for reversal are:

> “The *Court*erred in failing *to*declare a mistrial because of the prosecutor’s questions to Appellant about an extraneous offense.”

> “The Court erred in allowing the prosecution to impeach Appellant on a collateral matter by testimony about a_ extraneous offense.”

The questions complained of and the testimony concerning an extraneous offense were with reference to statements made by the appellant to the arresting officer after the arrest and while he was in custody.

No objections were made to the questions about the statements of the appellant to the arresting officer, or to the testimony of a state’s witness in rebuttal that appellant told the arresting officer that when he got out of jail he would get his gun and come back and get him. During direct examination, the appellant twice testified that he told the arresting officer that “he would beat the hell out of him.”

This Court has consistently held that where the appellant fails to object to the introduction of testimony in the trial court, he is in no position to assert on appeal that it was inadmissible. 5 Tex.Jur.2d 61, Sec. 39; Freeman v. State, 172 Tex.Cr.R. 389, 357 S.W.2d 757.

This rule is here applicable and controlling. Therefore no error is shown.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
# Four th Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

August 20, 2020

No. 04

- 18

- 00865

- CV

IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF M.A.C.

From the 175th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI23282 Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stah l , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On April 17, 2020

, we abated this appeal to the trial court to hold a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and whether appellant’s court

- appointed counsel had abandoned the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b) (2). We received a supplemental clerk’s record on August 19, 2020

, containing the trial court’s findings that appellant des ires to prosecute his appeal, that appellant is indigent

, and that appellant’s court

- appointed attorney, Judith Wemmert , has constru ctively abandoned the appeal. T he trial court did not impose sanctions , and it appointed new appellate counsel, David McLane, to represent appellant in this appeal

.

I t is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is REINSTATED on the docket of this court and th at appellant’s brief is due on or before September 21 , 2020

. No extensions of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and a ffixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of August, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz , Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION I, Lance K. Bradford, as the Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Mortgage, Inc.,
the sole Manager of Vestin Fund I, LLC, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Vestin Fund I, LLC;  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
Vestin Fund I, LLC as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.
    
    Vestin Fund I, LLCs other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Vestin Fund I,
LLC and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Vestin
Fund I, LLC, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    
    Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and
34-47986;  (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Vestin Fund I, LLCs
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluations; and  (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Vestin Fund I, LLCs
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
Vestin Fund I, LLCs most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect Vestin Fund
I, LLCs internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    Vestin Fund I, LLCs other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to Vestin Fund I, LLCs auditors and the audit committee of
Vestin Fund I, LLCs board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Vestin Fund I, LLCs
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and  (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in Vestin Fund I,
LLCs internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 9, 2004 /s/ Lance K. Bradford
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our reports included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements File Nos. 33-45015,
33-42561, 33-23294, 33-16585, 33-6604, 33-959, 2-91008, 33-40623, 33-46874,
33-46875, 33-50628, 33-57519 and 33-63637, 333-7279 and 33-62257.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Stamford, Connecticut
March 28, 1997
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3049

___________

Efrain Angel Garcia, *

*

Petitioner, * Petition for Review of an

* Order of the Immigration

v. * and Naturalization Service.

*

Immigration and Naturalization * [UNPUBLISHED]

Service, *

*

Respondent. *

___________

 Submitted: March 19, 2001

Filed: March 19, 2001

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Efrain Angel Garcia petitions for review of a final order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing as untimely his appeal from the Immigration

Judge's (IJ's) denial of his applications for asylum, suspension, and withholding of

deportation. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

Garcia's appeal of the IJ's February 3, 1998 decision was due on or before March

5, thirty days after the decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.38(b) (1997). Garcia submitted his
-2-

notice of appeal to the BIA on March 2, but the notice was rejected due to filing

defects. The BIA's rejection notice indicated Garcia had until March 20 to file a

corrected notice of appeal but he did not file it until March 25, well after both the

thirty-day period provided in the regulations and the rejection notice's fifteen-day

extension. The notice of appeal was thus untimely.

We also reject any argument that the untimeliness should be excused under the

"unique circumstances" doctrine. See Atiqullah v. INS, 39 F.3d 896, 898 (8th Cir.

1994) (per curiam) (generally time limit for filing notice of appeal to BIA is mandatory

and jurisdictional; in unique circumstances if party is misled by words or conduct of

court, appellate tribunal may have jurisdiction to hear otherwise untimely appeal). As

the BIA lacked jurisdiction to hear Garcia's appeal, we may not review the merits of

his petition. See Margalli-Olvera v. INS, 43 F.3d 345, 350 (8th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             2433 
<SECURITIES>                                          0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                      2378
<ALLOWANCES>                                        240
<INVENTORY>                                         396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5983
<PP&E>                                             2616
<DEPRECIATION>                                      531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     8067
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2574
<BONDS>                                            1195
<COMMON>                                             47
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                         4291
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       8067
<SALES>                                            8750
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   8750
<CGS>                                              4616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      4616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  10034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (57)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (5843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (6162)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (6162)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.67)
<EPS-DILUTED>					 (1.67)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Merisel, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Timothy N. Jenson, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/Timothy N. Jenson
------------------------------
Timothy N. Jenson
Chief Executive Officer and
  Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2004


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the Company), I, Marc A. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: February 5, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    MARC A.
COHEN                
|                        |  |     |  | Marc A. Cohen                       
|                        |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
TOUCHSTONE APPLIED SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC.
                              AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                   Exhibit 11
                                                                   ----------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                 ----------------------------------------

                                                2 0 0 2         2 0 0 1        2 0 0 0
                                                -------         -------        -------
<S>                                      <C>             <C>            <C>
Basic earnings:

  Net income (loss)                          $(2,348,005)    $   243,576    $(1,165,638)
                                             -----------     -----------    -----------

Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding           2,587,241       2,559,453      2,438,167
                                             -----------     -----------    -----------


  Basic earnings (loss) per share            $     (0.91)    $       .10    $      (.48)
                                             ===========     ===========    ===========

  Diluted earnings:

  Net income (loss)                          $(2,348,005)    $   243,576    $(1,165,638)
                                             -----------     -----------    -----------

  Shares:
  Weighted common shares outstanding           2,587,241       2,559,453      2,438,167
  Employee stock options                              --              --             --
  Warrants                                            --              --             --
  Consultants stock options                           --              --             --
  Directors stock options                             --             590             --
  Underwriter options                                 --              --             --
                                             -----------     -----------    -----------

  Total weighted shares outstanding            2,587,241       2,560,042      2,438,167
                                             -----------     -----------    -----------


  Diluted earnings (loss) per common share   $     (0.91)    $       .10    $      (.48)
                                             ===========     ===========    ============
</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

         The following is a list of all subsidiaries of First Equity Properties,
Inc., the state or other jurisdiction of organization or incorporation and the
names under which such subsidiaries do business (indention means direct parent
relationship):

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                Jurisdiction of
                                                Organization or
         Name of Entity                         Incorporation
----------------------------------------        ---------------
<S>                                             <C>
* First Equity Properties, Inc.                       Nevada

       Carmel Realty, Inc.                           Texas

            Regis Management Corporation             Nevada
            formerly Williamsburg
            Management Corporation)
</Table>






---------

* First Equity Properties, Inc. is also the holder of a 99% limited partner
  interest in Carmel Realty Services, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 10030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02896]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-24-2024]


Foreign-Trade Zone 44; Application for Expansion of Subzone 44P; 
Givaudan Fragrances Corporation; Mount Olive, New Jersey

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the State of New Jersey, Department of State, grantee of FTZ 
44, requesting an expansion of Subzone 44P on behalf of Givaudan 
Fragrances Corporation (Givaudan), in Mount Olive, New Jersey. The 
application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-
Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of 
the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on February 
7, 2024.
    The application requests authority to expand Subzone 44P to include 
the following new site: Site 4 (5.93 acres) 313 Waterloo Valley Road, 
Mount Olive, New Jersey. No authorization for additional production 
activity has been requested at this time. The proposed expanded subzone 
would be subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 44.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Christopher Kemp of 
the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ddbba9a79da9afbcb9b8f3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6006141a2014120104054e070f16">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is March 25, 2024. 
Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to April 8, 2024.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d291baa0bba1a6bda2bab7a0fc99b7bfa292a6a0b3b6b7fcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b48637962787f647b636e7925406e667b4b7f796a6f6e256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 7, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-02896 Filed 2-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>