alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Melvin Hooper, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Technol Fuel
Conditioners, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-4 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a) designed
such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that  material  information
relating to the registrant,  including its  consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made
known to us by others within those entities,  particularly  during the period in
which this quarterly report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of
the registrant's  disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days
prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation  Date");  and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

         5. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee  of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the
equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation
of internal  controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's  auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;  and b) any
fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

         6. The registrant's  other certifying  officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant  changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

         Date: November 25, 2003

         /s/ Melvin Hooper
         ---------------------------------------------------
             Melvin Hooper,
             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               3
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                       0
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0




</TABLE>
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1465 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to treat the Commonwealth 

of the Northern Mariana Islands in the same manner as Guam is treated. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 8, 2011 

Mr. SABLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to treat 

the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in 

the same manner as Guam is treated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assuring You Uniform 

5 Dietary Assistance (AYUDA) Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 3 of the Food and Nutri8 tion Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2012) is amended— 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1465 IH

1 (1) in subsection (s) by inserting ‘‘the Common2 wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after 

3 ‘‘Guam’’, and 

4 (2) in subsection (u)(3) by inserting ‘‘the Com5 monwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after 

6 ‘‘Guam,’’. 

7 (b) ELIGIBILITY STANDARDS.—Section 5 of the Food 

8 and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2014) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (b) by inserting ‘‘the Com10 monwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after 

11 ‘‘Guam,’’, and 

12 (2) in subsection (c)— 

13 (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘and 

14 Guam,’’ and inserting ‘‘Guam, and the Com15 monwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,’’, 

16 and 

17 (B) in the last sentence by striking ‘‘or 

18 Guam’’ and inserting ‘‘Guam, or the Common19 wealth of the Northern Mariana Islands’’, and 

20 (3) in subsection (e)— 

21 (A) in paragraph (1)(B)— 

22 (i) in the heading by striking 

23 ‘‘GUAM.’’ and inserting ‘‘GUAM AND THE

24 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MAR25 IANA ISLANDS.’’, 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1465 IH

1 (ii) in clause (i) by inserting ‘‘and the 

2 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana 

3 Islands’’ after ‘‘Guam’’, and 

4 (iii) in clause (ii) by inserting ‘‘and 

5 the Commonwealth of the Northern Mar6 iana Islands’’ after ‘‘Guam’’, and 

7 (B) in paragraph (6)(B) by inserting ‘‘the 

8 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Is9 lands,’’ after ‘‘Guam,’’. 

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

11 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

12 take effect on October 1, 2012. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 38 (Friday, February 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9848-9849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04184]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9025-7]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www2.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs)
Filed 02/15/2016 Through 02/19/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20160041, Final, FTA, NC, Durham-Orange Light Rail, Contact: 
Stanley A. Mitchell 404-865-5600, Under MAP 21 section 1319, FTA has 
issued a Final EIS and ROD. Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period 
under NEPA does not apply to this action.
EIS No. 20160042, Final, USACE, CA, San Elijo Lagoon Restoration 
Project, Review Period Ends: 03/28/2016, Contact: Meris Guerrero 760-
602-4836
EIS No. 20160043, Draft Supplement, USFWS, OH, Ballville Dam Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 04/11/2016, Contact: Brian Elkington 612-713-5168
EIS No. 20160044, Draft Supplement, BOEM, LA, Gulf of Mexico OCS Oil 
and Gas Lease Sale: 2017 Central Planning Area Lease Sale 247, Comment 
Period Ends: 04/11/2016, Contact: Gary Goeke 504-736-3233
EIS No. 20160045, Final, TVA, TN, Floating Houses Policy Review, Review 
Period Ends: 03/28/2016, Contact: Matthew Higdon 865-632-8051
EIS No. 20160046, Draft, FERC, OH, Rover Pipeline, Panhandle Backhaul,

[[Page 9849]]

and Trunkline Backhaul Projects, Comment Period Ends: 04/11/2016, 
Contact: Kevin Bowman 202-502-6287

    Dated: February 23, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-04184 Filed 2-25-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant**


**to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of OnScreen Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company"), on Form 10-QSB of the quarter ended March 31, 2007, I hereby certify
      solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





OnScreen
      Technologies, Inc.




By:
            /s/ Mark
              R. Chandler
            Dated
              this 15thday of May 2007Mark
                  R. Chandler
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer / Principal Accounting
                    Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      5
<CIK>                          0000725261
<NAME>                         DYCO OIL & GAS PROGRAM 1984-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                            132,902
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      73,343
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  206,245
<PP&E>                         30,210,880
<DEPRECIATION>                 30,012,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    467,416
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               4,413
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                        448,444
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      467,416
<SALES>                           342,339
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  345,421
<CGS>                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     175,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   170,059
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               170,059
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      170,059
<EPS-BASIC>                         30.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 23-1039

___________________________

 

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Michael G. Wells

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

Submitted: September 11, 2023

Filed:September 14, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

 

Before BENTON, KELLY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

 

PER CURIAM.

Michael Wells appeals after the district court1 denied his motions to modify a 

2003 stipulation for judgment by consent and associated judgment, for 

1

The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the 

Western District of Missouri.
-2- 

reconsideration, and for a hearing on reconsideration. Having jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

 Reviewing the parties’ arguments and the circumstances of this case, this

court finds no basis to reverse the district court’s orders. The district court did not

abuse its discretion in denying Wells’s motion to modify the judgment by consent. 

See City of Duluth v. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, 702 F.3d 1147, 

1152, 1154 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk Cnty. 

Jail, 502 U.S. 367, 383 (1992) (party seeking modification of consent decree bears 

burden of establishing significant change in circumstances warrants revision of 

decree). This court has also considered Wells’s challenges to the denial of his 

motions to reconsider and for a hearing, and finds no error. See Arnold v. Wood, 

238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (motion for relief from judgment or order is 

reviewed for abuse of discretion, and requires showing of exceptional circumstances 

warranting relief).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
# FecEx Express
John E. Ellington Sr. Manager Quality Control Chief Inspector, FDER140A 7401 World WayWest, Los Angeles, CA. 90045 Ph. 310-568-7451 E-mail: john.ellington@fedex.com FedEx Quality Control/lAX 7401 World WayWest Los Angeles, CA90045 Telephone 310.568.7451 Fax 310.568.7433

Date: March 17, 2016



### Re: Request Exemption (Extension) Pursuant to Section 145.103(b) ofthe CFR
On September 2, 2014 FedEx Repair Station FDER140A petitioned for, and was granted a temporary exemption from 14 CFR 145.103(b). FedEx Repair Station FDER140A respectfully requests an extension ofthis exemption for an additionaltwo (2) years. 14 CFR 145.103(b) prescribes that "a certificated repair station with an airframe rating must provide suitable permanent housing to enclose the largesttype and modelofaircraft listed on its operations specifications". Currently, FedEx holds Airframe Class Ratings 2 and 4. These ratings allow maintenance to be performed on all large aircraft over 12,500 pounds. Therefore, our operation specifications do not list aircraft by type and model. FedEx Repair Station FDER140A is headquartered at 7401 World Way West, LAX, where management and technical support staffare domiciled. Both FedEx and Flying Tigers have performed maintenance on large aircraft at the LAX Hangar location since 1965, with no adverse effects. The Southern California environment and climate are very favorable and have beenfound to pose no tangible risk to safety ofpersonnelormaintenance operations. In the event ofsevere weather conditions, FedEx takes precautions to mitigate risk, inspects all areas ofthe aircraft priorto closing and corrects all discrepancies priorto closing. The LAX hangar is staffed with 24/7 security officers and is equipped with video surveillance systems throughout.

Future potential existsfor maintenance/modification ofaircraft inside the LAX hangar, along with current contracts to modify foreign government aircraft. Due to the foreign government's security requirements; the aircraft will be modified in a hangarwherethe aircraft is totally enclosed and notvisible to the public. Previous cases referenced in DOT/FAA Regulatory Dockets FAA-2009-0249 and FAA-2004-18105 demonstrated precedencefor exemption in areaswhere climate is found to be conducive to safe operations. An extended grant of exemption would be in the bestinterest ofthe public and U.S. government as it would allow FedEx to continue to provide repair station services to the public, U.S. government, and foreign government aircraft.
In consideration ofclimate conditions at LAX, and the grants of exemption in the aforementioned dockets, FedEx feels that an extension ofexemption is founded.
Your consideration and approval ofthis extension request would be greatly appreciated. FedEx looks forward to maintaining a strong working relationship with the FederalAviation Agency. Please, do not hesitate to contact us with any questions, concerns, or requests that you may have.



## )**-~** 

## r- -:---
... Regards, 

# £/LT**~{::;,** ""'-'

# ~hn E. Ellington

.
Exhibit 23.1




MS Group CPA LLC


6 Center Street Edison New Jersey 08817 USA


TEL: 732-885-1555 FAX: 732-885-0999


Website:www.mscpausa.com









Consent of Independent Auditors




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-162667) pertaining to China Swine Genetics, Inc. 2009 Stock and Stock Option Plan of our report dated September 20, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) of Sen Yu International Holdings, Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.




/s/MS Group CPA LLC


Edison, New Jersey


October 13 , 2011







---
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

AmericanWest Bancorporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement numbers 333-132811, 333-101040, 333-95989, 333-72834, 333-65628, 333-65630, and 333-58511, on Forms S-8 of AmericanWest Bancorporation of our report dated March 13, 2007, relating to the consolidated statement of
financial condition of AmericanWest Bancorporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the three years
ended December 31, 2006, and in our same report, with respect to AmericanWest Bancorporation managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, which report is included in this amended annual report on Form 10-K of AmericanWest Bancorporation for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ Moss Adams LLP 
|                   
|Spokane, Washington
|March 13, 2007
<Page>

32.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
        of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
        Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Apogee
Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007

                                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Michael Anthony
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Michael Anthony
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
#### City of Cambridge, Appellee, *v.*Elliott, Appellant.

(No. 27621

Decided June 14, 1939.)

*Mr. Craig Carnes*and *Mr. Charles S. Bheppcurd,*for appellee.

*Mr. William N. Shaote, Mr. W. Kirie Deselm, Messrs. Kenderson, Burr, Randall & Porter*and *Mr. Lawrence D. Stanley,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged, *sua sponte,*that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed *577for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Weygandt, C. J., not participating.
#### Fred LUNA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27575.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 27, 1955.

*150No' attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Aggravated assault is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $250.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Louisa WATERS v. STATE.

No. 29972.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1958.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the possession of policy paraphernalia; the punishment, sixty days in jail.

The state in its brief filed in this cause confesses error and admits that the arrest of the appellant was unlawful and the evidence on which this conviction rests was *832obtained as the result of an illegal search following the arrest. We agree.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved *by*the Court.