alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED: February 11, 2015
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 

### 2014-0814
ORDER ON DELTA'S MOTION FORLEAVE TO FILE REPLY The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Complaint dated October 

### 16, 2014. Delta Air Lines, Inc., (hereinafter "Delta") filed a "Motion for Leave to File Reply" datedNovember

### 26,2014. The FAA has not responded. WHEREFORE, itbe and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Delta'sMotion for Leave to File Reply is GRANTED.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List --.

**'~:** · ...)-SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Jon-Peter F. Kelly, Re.spondent 's Counsel Assistant General Counsel Delta Air Lines, Inc. Department 981 1030 DeltaBoulevard Atlanta, GA 30354-1989 TEL: 404-714-9631 FAX: 404-714-5631 ONE COPY

Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, ASO-7 Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2014-0814 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430. 2
ex10-16.htm


Exhibit 10.16

 

	
 



 

 

 

October 21, 2016

 

Herman Schwarz

1706 Brandywine Court

Atlanta, GA 30338

 

Dear Herman:

 

As discussed, in order to allow for additional time for you and Providence to discuss the terms of your continued employment with The Providence Service Corporation (“Providence”) and Logisticare Solutions, LLC, the Term (as defined in Section 1(a) therein) of your March 24, 2014 Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) is hereby extended to January 3, 2017 from October 14, 2016.   No other provision of the Employment Agreement has changed.  

 

	
 
	
Sincerely,

	
 
	
/s/ James M. Lindstrom

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
James Lindstrom

Chief Executive Officer



 

Please confirm your agreement with the foregoing by signing below.

 

 

	
Date:      10/21/16   
	 /s/ Herman Schwarz
	 	Herman Schwarz


 

 

700 Canal Street, Third Floor ● Stamford, Connecticut 06902 ● 203/307.2800 ● www.prscholdings.com
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Soyo Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  Ming
Tung Chok,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Ming Tung Chok
-----------------------
Ming Tung Chok
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2006
Exhibit 10.15c


 


ADDENDUM THREE


TO EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT


 


This ADDENDUM THREE
TO EQUIPMENT LEASE AGREEMENT (this “Addendum”) is dated effective as of September 3, 2016, between Mercy Hospital Oklahoma
City, Inc., an Oklahoma not for profit corporation, formerly known as Mercy Health Center, Inc. (“Hospital”), and GK
Financing, LLC, a California limited liability company (“GKF”).


 


Recitals:


 


WHEREAS, GKF and Hospital
are parties to a certain Equipment Lease Agreement dated May 28, 2004, as amended by certain Addendum One dated December 23, 2011
and Addendum Two dated July 31, 2015 (as amended, the “Lease”), and desire to extend the term of the Lease as set forth
herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions, and agreements set forth herein, and for the other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


Agreement:


 


1.           Defined
Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, the capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meanings set
forth in the Lease.


 


2.           Extension
of Term.


 


		a.	It is acknowledged that pursuant to Addendum Two, the Lease is currently set to expire on September
2, 2016.



 


		b.	The Term of the Agreement is hereby extended to April 30, 2017, and cannot be further extended
without the written approval of both parties.



 


3.           Full
Force and Effect. Except as amended by this Addendum, all of the terms and provisions of the Lease shall remain in full
force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Addendum effective as of the date first written above.


 


	GKF:	Hospital:
	 	 
	GK Financing, LLC	Mercy Hospital Oklahoma City, Inc., an Oklahoma not for profit corporation (formerly known as Mercy Health Center, Inc.)
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Ernest A. Bates	By:	/s/ Jim R. Gebhart
	 	Ernest A. Bates, M.D.	Name:	Jim R. Gebhart
	 	Policy Committee Member	Title:	President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-5248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus LARRY DONNELL OWENS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-04-276) Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 26, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, Eric D. Placke, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Michael Augustus DeFranco, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry Donnell Owens appeals from his sentence imposed upon resentencing following his guilty plea to possession of a firearm by a prohibited person in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (2000). The district court had originally sentenced Owens under the mandatory federal sentencing guidelines to 108 months incarceration. We remanded the case for resentencing in light of United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). On remand, the district court imposed a 100-month sentence. Owens’ counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), stating that there were no meritorious issues for appeal, but addressing the reasonableness of the sentence. Owens was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but he has not done so. Because our review of the record discloses no reversible error, we affirm. We find that the district court properly applied the sentencing guidelines and considered the relevant sentencing factors before imposing the 100-month sentence. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West Supp. 2005); see United States v. Hughes , 401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th Cir. 2005). Additionally, we find that Owens’ sentence, which is “with the properly calculated [g]uidelines range,” is reasonable. SeeUnited States v. Green , 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation- 3 - omitted), petition for cert. filed , U.S.L.W. (U.S. April 17, 2006) (No. 05-10474). As required by Anders , we have reviewed the entire record and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Owens’ sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 181/2010

| | ISSN 1725-5228
  doi:10.3000/17255228.C_2010.181.pol |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 181 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 536 lipca 2010 |

ISSN 1725-5228

doi:10.3000/17255228.C_2010.181.pol

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 181

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 536 lipca 2010

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2010/C 181/01 | Errata do wersji skonsolidowanej Traktatu ustanawiającego Europejską Wspólnotę Energii Atomowej (Dz.U. C 84 z 30.3.2010) | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

2010/C 181/01

Errata do wersji skonsolidowanej Traktatu ustanawiającego Europejską Wspólnotę Energii Atomowej (Dz.U. C 84 z 30.3.2010)

1

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

6.7.2010

| 6.7.2010 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

C 181/1

---

ERRATA

do wersji skonsolidowanej Traktatu ustanawiającego Europejską Wspólnotę Energii Atomowej

(

  „Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej ”C 84 z dnia 30 marca 2010 r.

  )

(2010/C 181/01)

Strona 4, spis treści, tytuł VI:

zamiast:

| „TYTUŁ VI | Postanowienia końcowe |
| --- | --- |

„TYTUŁ VI

powinno być:

powinno być:

| „TYTUŁ VI | Postanowienia dotyczące okresu wstępnego (uchylony) |
| --- | --- |

„TYTUŁ VI

POSTANOWIENIA KOŃCOWE

Strona 14, art. 17 ust. 1, poniżej lit. b) pkt (iv):

Ostatni akapit („Aby spełnić te wymogi, Państwa Członkowskie nie mogą podejmować (...)”) należy przesunąć w lewo do poziomu pierwszego akapitu, aby wyraźnie wskazać, że jest to oddzielny akapit, a nie część lit. b) pkt (iv).

Ostatni akapit („Aby spełnić te wymogi, Państwa Członkowskie nie mogą podejmować (...)”) należy przesunąć w lewo do poziomu pierwszego akapitu, aby wyraźnie wskazać, że jest to oddzielny akapit, a nie część lit. b) pkt (iv).

Strona 56, tytuł VI:

zamiast:

zamiast:

„TYTUŁ VI

Artykuł 209 - 223

(Uchylone)

POSTANOWIENIA KOŃCOWE”

powinno być:

powinno być:

„TYTUŁ VI

POSTANOWIENIA DOTYCZĄCE OKRESU WSTĘPNEGO

(Uchylony)

Artykuły 209 - 223

(Uchylone)

POSTANOWIENIA KOŃCOWE”

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00455-CV

Johnny Lee Davis

v.

The City of Aransas Pass, Aransas Pass Police Dept., Aransas Pass City Government 

Chief of Police Eric Blanchard, Captain Kyle Rhodes, Detective Leo Martinez

On Appeal from the

343rd District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-14-5942CV-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant Johnny Lee Davis, although he is exempt from payment due to his 

inability to pay court costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 29, 2018
# COGNIGEN
NETWORKS, INC.

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18
U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Cognigen Networks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas S. Smith, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/
Thomas S. SmithThomas S. SmithChief Executive OfficerSeptember 7, 2005
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 126 (Monday, July 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 39435]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15725]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8365]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
the Dominican Republic

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, P.L. 
112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Div. F, P.L. 113-6), and Department of State 
Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is 
important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to the Dominican Republic and I 
hereby waive this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 31, 2013.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-15725 Filed 6-28-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-29-P
```
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

FINAL AMENDMENT AGREEMENT 

FINAL AMENDMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of March 22, 2017, by and among (i) CBRE Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation formerly known as
CBRE Holding, Inc. and subsequently, CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. (the “Company”), (ii) CBRE Services, Inc. (“CBRE”), a Delaware corporation formerly known as CB Richard Ellis Services, Inc.,
(iii) Frederic V. Malek and (iv) Raymond E. Wirta. 
 RECITALS: 

A. The Company, CBRE, Messrs. Malek and Wirta and certain other parties are parties to a Securityholders’ Agreement, dated as of
July 20, 2001 (as amended on April 14, 2004, November 24, 2004 and August 1, 2005, the “Securityholders’ Agreement”); 

B. Messrs. Malek and Wirta are together holders of a majority of the Restricted Securities held by the Securityholders; and 

C. The parties hereto have agreed to amend the Securityholders’ Agreement pursuant to Section 6.6 thereof to provide for termination
of its legacy terms upon the terms set forth herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein
contained, the parties hereto agree that the Securityholders’ Agreement is hereby amended in accordance with Section 6.6 thereof to provide that, except as provided below, all provisions of the Securityholders’ Agreement are hereby
terminated with no further force or effect; provided, however, that such termination shall not apply to Section 3.9 and Section 5.4 with respect to any actions, or omissions to act, prior to the date of this Final Amendment Agreement. 

Terms defined in the Securityholders’ Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Securityholders’
Agreement. 
 This Final Amendment Agreement will be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware
applicable to contracts executed and performed entirely within that state. 
 This Final Amendment Agreement may be executed in any number
of counterparts (including facsimile or other electronic transmission), each of which will be deemed to be an original and all together will be deemed to be one instrument. 

[remainder of the page intentionally left blank] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Final Amendment Agreement as of the
date first written above. 
  

			
	CBRE GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Laurence H. Midler
		 	Name: Laurence H. Midler
		 	Title: EVP and General Counsel
	
	CBRE SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Laurence H. Midler
		 	 Name: Laurence H. Midler
 Title: EVP and
General Counsel

	
	
	/s/ Frederic V. Malek
	Frederic V. Malek
	
	/s/ Raymond E. Wirta
	Raymond E. Wirta


 [Signature Page to Final Amendment Agreement]
Please post the Test Report for FCCU Chevron Kapolei Refinery to Docket 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0682 

Paula Hirtz 

to: Docket 

12/09/2011 11:12 AM 

cc: 

Brenda Shine, Eric Goehl 

We are providing correspondence from Chevron below to clarify the Test Report for FCCU Chevron 

Kapolei Refinery was not claimed CBI and therefore can be made publically available in the above 

referenced docket. Those reports that were claimed as CBI are being handled as such, so they will not be 

submitted for posting to the docket or distributed in any way as required by EPA CBI procedures. 

Paula Hirtz 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code E143-01 

109 TW Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 

Email: hirtz.paula@epa.gov 

Direct Line: (919) 541-2618 

----- Forwarded by Paula Hirtz/RTP/USEPA/US on 12/09/2011 11:01 AM ----- 

From: Heyer, Verle V [mailto:VHEY@chevron.com] 

Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 8:23 PM

To: Richardson Fry, Carrie

Subject: Disclaimer Comments 

Carrie, 

The NON-CBI submission for EPA’s ICR Section 114 Component 4 contains a copy of the 

laboratory report associated with the FCCU stack testing requirement. The report from URS 

Corporation contains a standard laboratory-to-customer disclaimer about the use of the 

information contained within the report (on the second page of the report). A similar disclaimer 

is documented in Attachment Q in association with e-mail communications between EPA and 

URS. These two disclaimers are not intended to be used for the purpose of claiming business 

confidentiality as allowed by the instructions for component 4 submissions. 

Respectfully, 

Verle Heyer 

Environmental Specialist 

Chevron Hawaii Refinery 

ph: 808-682-2394
Order filed July 27 , 2017.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00864

- CR

____________ BENJAMIN DEVORA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 180th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1474449



### ORDER

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this Court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. Cal ifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Accordingly, on May 23, 2017, we ordered that the record be provided to appellant. On June 26, 2017, the District Clerk of Harris County notified this court that appel lant received the record on May 30, 2017.On July 10, 2017, appellant filed a pro se motion for production of additional

records, in which he seeks the transcripts of all pretrial conferences and hearings. The
record filed with this court does not contain the requested items. It is unclear from our record whether a record was made of any pretrial conferences and hearings. Accordingly,

we GRANT appellant’s motion, and issue the following order:

We order Gina Bench , the official court reporter for the 180 th District Court, to certify to this court whether a transcript was made of any pretrial conferences or hearings. If any pretrial conferences or hearings were transcribed , the record of that conference or hearing, together with all exhibits, if any, shall be filed with the clerk of this court within 30 days of the date of this order. In addition, in accordance with local procedure, the clerk of the court shall furnish a copy of the reporter’s record, or certification that no record of pretrial conferences o r hearings was made, to appellant within 45 days of the date of this order and certify to this court the date on which delivery of the record to appellant is made.
Appellant’s pro se brief shall be filed with this court within thirty days after receipt of a copy of the supplemental record or receipt of notice that no record was made.

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Whittier EnergyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006,(the “Report”), I, Michael B. Young, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 15, 2006 | */s/ Michael B. Young*   | * * |
|---------------------|--------------------------|----------|
|                | Michael  B. Young        |
|                | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
#### The State, ex rel. Board of Education of Twin Special No. 2 School Dist., Darke County, *v.*Dietrich, Dir. of Education. The State, ex rel. Board of Education of Allen Township Rural School Dist., Darke County, *v.*Dietrich, Dir. of Education. The State, ex rel. Board of Education of Richland Township Rural School Dist., Darke County, *v.*Dietrich, Dir. of Education. The State, ex rel. Board of Education of Patterson Special No. 1 School Dist., Darke County, *v.*Dietrich, Dir. of Education.

(Nos. 27292, 27294, 27295 and 27296

Decided January 25, 1939.)

*Mr. Henry S. Ballard, Mr. Howard Dresbach*and *Mr. Hugh A. Staley,*prosecuting attorney, for relators.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. Charles F. Ohl,*for respondent.

By agreement of parties it is ordered and adjudged *26that writs of mandamus be, and the same are hereby allowed, on authority of *State, ex rel. Board of Education of Patterson Special No. 5 School District, Darlte County,*v. *Dietrich, Dir. of Education,*134 Ohio St., 524, 18 N. E. (2d), 122.

*Writs allowed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00763-CV

Rajasekhar BORRA M.D. and Inpatient Consultants of Texas P.L.L.C.,

Appellants

v.

Rachael HERNANDEZ, Individually and on behalf of The Estate of Ricardo Hernandez Jr. 

Deceased, Ricardo Hernandez III, Tanya A. Hernandez, Roxanne H. Hernandez, Katherine A. 

Young and Rachael Lee Hernandez,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-01562

John D. Gabriel Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 12, 2012

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they have 

“reached an agreement to resolve the issues raised by the appeal.” The motion is granted, and 

the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a), 43.2(f). Costs of the appeal are taxed 

against the parties who incurred them. The clerk of this court is ordered to issue the mandate in 

this appeal contemporaneously with this court’s opinion and judgment.

PER CURIAM