alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jason EITEL, Plaintiff, and Gary R. EITEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bradley A. CARPENTER; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-35538.

D.C. No. CV-00-05031-RJB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2002 *.

Decided July 30, 2002.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gary R. Eitel appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion seeking to remove District Judge Bryan from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Because final judgment has been entered in the district court, we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s denial of a recusal motion, *Leslie v. Grupo ICA,*198 F.3d 1152, 1160 (9th Cir.1999), and we affirm.

Because Eitel sought to disqualify the district judge solely on the basis of prior adverse decisions, the district court did not *118abuse its discretion by denying the motion. *See*28 U.S.C. § 455(a); *Leslie v. Grupo ICA*198 F.3d at 1160.

Eitel’s remaining contentions lack merit. We decline to reach arguments Eitel raises for the first time in his reply brief. *See Eberle v. City of Anaheim,*901 F.2d 814, 818 (9th Cir.1990).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 573 Referral Instructions Senate (RIS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 573

    To reduce spending in fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 16, 1995

   Mr. Pryor introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the 
 Committees on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions 
that if one committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to 
                        report or be discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reduce spending in fiscal year 1996, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Spending Reductions Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. SERVICE CONTRACTS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not more than 
$100,000,000,000 shall be available for service contracts in fiscal 
year 1996.

SEC. 3. FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not more than 
$1,000,000,000 shall be available for federally funded research and 
development centers at the Department of Defense in fiscal year 1996.

SEC. 4. FOREIGN MILITARY FINANCING.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not more than 
$3,000,000,000 shall be available for the foreign military financing 
program in fiscal year 1996.

SEC. 5. WORLD BANK FUNDING.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in fiscal year 1996--
            (1) not more than $1,000,000,000 shall be available for the 
        International Development Association; and
            (2) not more than $58,000,000 shall be available for the 
        International Finance Corporation.

SEC. 6. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE HUMANITARIAN AND CIVIC ASSISTANCE 
              PROGRAMS.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not more than 
$25,000,000 shall be available for humanitarian assistance in fiscal 
year 1996.
                                 <all>
```
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER Appellate case name: Quincy Deshan Butler v. Bank of America Appellate case number: 01
- 1 9
- 00 172
- CV Trial court case number: 2018
- 40373 Trial court: 55th District Court of Harris County Appellant Quincy Deshan Butler , an inmate, appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his underlying civil action for want of prosecution
. On appeal, appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs but has failed to comply with th e additional requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code governing inmate litigation. Section 14.004 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides that an inmate who files an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inabil ity to pay costs must file an additional affidavit or declaration identifying each prior lawsuit, other than an action under the Family Code, filed by the inmate without legal representation. T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE § 14.004(a). As to each prior lawsuit, the affidavit or declaration must specify the operative facts, the case name or style, the cause number, the court in which it was brought, the names of the parties, and the result of the suit. Id
. If a previous action or claim was dismissed as frivolous or malicious, the affidavit or unsworn declaration of previous filings must state the date of any final judgment or order affirming the dismissal. T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE § 14.004(b). Additionally, the affidavit or unsworn d eclaration of previous filings must be accompanied by a certified copy of the inmate ’s trust account statement reflecting the balance of the account at the time the appeal was filed and all account activity during the six months preceding the date the appe al was filed. T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE §§ 14.004(c); 14.006(f); see Douglas v. Moffett , 418 S.W.3d 336, 339 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.). A ppellant has not filed an additional affidavit or declaration relating to previous filings nor has appellant filed a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. Unless all documents required by Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code are filed by December 7 , 201 9 , this appeal may be dismissed without further notice
. See Gozowski v. T.D.C.J.

– I.D. , No. 12
- 14
- 00350
- CV, 2014 WL 6983246, *1 (Tex. App.

— Tyler Dec. 10, 2014, no pet. ) ; Hickman v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice , No. 13
- 12
- 00437
- CV, 2013 WL 3770916, at *2 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi July 18, 2013, no pet.); Douglas v . Turner , 441 S.W.3d 337, 339 (Tex. App.

— Waco May 9, 2013, no pet.).It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_____

/s/ Sherry Radack

____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court Date: __ Novemb er 7, 2019

___
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,996
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,996)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1565

PAMELA JO BUNKER,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES ARMY,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:16-cv-00243-REP)

Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 16, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela Jo Bunker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Pamela Jo Bunker appeals the district court’s order denying 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On appeal, we confine our 

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b). Because Bunker’s informal brief does not 

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Bunker 

has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See

Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 

2004). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis 

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Официален вестник C 181/2010

| | ISSN 1830-365X
  doi:10.3000/1830365X.C_2010.181.bul |
| --- | --- |
| Официален вестник
  на Европейския съюз | C 181 |
| | |
| Издание на български език | Информация и известия | Година 536 юли 2010 г. |

ISSN 1830-365X

doi:10.3000/1830365X.C_2010.181.bul

Официален вестник

на Европейския съюз

C 181

Издание на български език

Информация и известия

Година 536 юли 2010 г.

---

| Известие No | Съдържание | Страница |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2010/C 181/01 | ПОПРАВКА НА ЯВНА ФАКТИЧЕСКА ГРЕШКА на консолидирания текст на Договора за създаване на Европейската общност за атомна енергия (OB C 84, 30.3.2010 г.) | 1 |

Известие No

Съдържание

Страница

2010/C 181/01

ПОПРАВКА НА ЯВНА ФАКТИЧЕСКА ГРЕШКА на консолидирания текст на Договора за създаване на Европейската общност за атомна енергия (OB C 84, 30.3.2010 г.)

1

| BG | |
| --- | --- |

BG

---

6.7.2010

| 6.7.2010 | BG | Официален вестник на Европейския съюз | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

BG

Официален вестник на Европейския съюз

C 181/1

---

ПОПРАВКА НА ЯВНА ФАКТИЧЕСКА ГРЕШКА

на консолидирания текст на Договора за създаване на Европейската общност за атомна енергия

(

  „Официален вестник на Европейския съюз“ C 84 от 30 март 2010 г.

  )

(2010/C 181/01)

На страница 4, в съдържанието, дял шести:

Вместо:

| „ДЯЛ ШЕСТИ | Заключителни разпоредби |
| --- | --- |

„ДЯЛ ШЕСТИ

да се чете:

да се чете:

| „ДЯЛ ШЕСТИ | Разпоредби относно началния период (отменен) |
| --- | --- |

„ДЯЛ ШЕСТИ

ЗАКЛЮЧИТЕЛНИ РАЗПОРЕДБИ

На страница 14, член 17, параграф 1, буква б), подточка iv):

Последната алинея („Държавите-членки не могат, (...)“) се премества наляво до нивото на първата алинея, за да е видно, че става въпрос за отделна алинея, а не за част от буква б), подточка iv).

Последната алинея („Държавите-членки не могат, (...)“) се премества наляво до нивото на първата алинея, за да е видно, че става въпрос за отделна алинея, а не за част от буква б), подточка iv).

На страница 56, дял шести:

Вместо:

Вместо:

„ДЯЛ ШЕСТИ

Членове 209 - 223

(отменени)

ЗАКЛЮЧИТЕЛНИ РАЗПОРЕДБИ“

да се чете:

да се чете:

„ДЯЛ ШЕСТИ

РАЗПОРЕДБИ ОТНОСНО НАЧАЛНИЯ ПЕРИОД

(отменен)

Членове 209 - 223

(отменени)

ЗАКЛЮЧИТЕЛНИ РАЗПОРЕДБИ“

---
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements File Nos. 33-45015, 33-42561,
33-23294, 33-16585, 33-6604, 33-959, 2-91008, 33-40623, 33-46874, 33-50628,
33-57519, 33-63637, 333-7279 and 33-62257.


                                         ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Stamford, Connecticut
April 14, 1999



<PAGE>
#### James DICKERSON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

April 23, 1965.

*936James E. Higgins, Jr., Hopkinsville, for appellant.

Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., Frank Berry, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

MOREMEN, Chief Justice.

On the 21st day of March, 1963, appellant, James Dickerson, after a plea of guilty to an indictment for rape, was sentenced by the Christian Circuit Court to life imprisonment in the penitentiary without privilege of parole.

On the 15th day of July, 1964, a motion to vacate that judgment was filed under RCr 11.42. The court docketed the case for trial, ordered the warden of the Kentucky State Penitentiary at Eddyville to produce the petitioner for a hearing, and appointed a local attorney to represent him. After a full hearing, the motion was overruled.

Appellant contends that the judgment should be vacated because (1) after his arrest he was not taken without unnecessary delay before a magistrate as directed by RCr 3.02, and (2) he was not represented by counsel at the time he made a confession.

Appellant concedes that the determination of a reasonable time within which to take an arrested person before a magistrate is to be made from the facts of the particular case. Rosenberg v. Bax, Ky., 258 S.W.2d 458, and Meyers v. Dunn, 126 Ky. 548, 104 S.W. 352, 13 L.R.A.,N.S., 881. He does not contend the circuit court was not justified in ordering his removal to a place of safety because of the high feeling present in the community. He insists, however, that he should have been granted a hearing before his removal to a place of safety. To grant such a hearing before his removal would defeat the purpose of the safety measure. Since there was danger of mob violence, any delay would have increased the hazard. We conclude that the terms of RCr 3.02 were not violated.

Appellant’s contention in regard to his second ground is not too clear. It seems to be based on the proposition that he confessed that he was guilty of the offense charged (after the examining trial) because of fear of mob violence and subsequently pled guilty at the trial because of the existence of that signed confession, not knowing that a confession given under such circumstances was inadmissible. First — the proof overwhelmingly discloses that the confession was not forced by the circumstances and was given voluntarily. Second — he had able counsel at the trial who testified at the RCr 11.42 hearing that he did not influence appellant in any manner to enter such a plea, but gave that option entirely to him.

The court, on the trial of this RCr 11.42 motion, held a full, complete hearing and reached a conclusion that seems absolute to us. Although we have reviewed this appeal at some length, it could well have been affirmed upon the citation of King v. Commonwealth, Ky., 387 S.W.2d 582, decided February 26, 1965.

Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12321]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Picture Worlds: Greek, Maya and Moche Pottery” at the J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Villa, Pacific Palisades, California; the Michael C. Carlos Museum, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-02502 Filed 2-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                Exhibit 27
Financial Data Schedule

<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information
extracted  from  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  of TV
Filme,  Inc.  At December  31,  1998 and the  consolidated
statements of operations  for the year ended  December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001013608
<NAME>                        TV FILME, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>          1,000                         
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          57,492
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                       387
<INVENTORY>                                      4,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,718
<PP&E>                                          89,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,840
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,491
<BONDS>                                        140,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           108
<OTHER-SE>                                     (17,998)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,314
<SALES>                                         45,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,408
<CGS>                                           19,617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,964
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,651
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,674
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (19,654)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (40,220)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (40,220)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (40,220)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.72)
        




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1384 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1384

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily increase the 
         investment tax credit for geothermal energy property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2011

 Mr. Heller (for himself and Mr. Blumenauer) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to temporarily increase the 
         investment tax credit for geothermal energy property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Geothermal Tax Parity Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT FOR GEOTHERMAL 
              ENERGY PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Subclause (II) of section 48(a)(2)(A)(i) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``paragraph 
(3)(A)(i)'' and inserting ``clause (i) or (iii) of paragraph (3)(A)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```