alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the use, in this Annual Report of Localiza Franchising S.A. on
Form 20-F filed on June 29, 2004 (File No. 333-8128-01), which is incorporated
by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed on August 24, 2001
(Registration No. 333-13852-01), of our report dated April 2, 2004.



Belo Horizonte, Brazil

June 29, 2004


/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the
annual period ended June 3, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nicholas Konidaris, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|/s/ Nicholas Konidaris                                  
|Nicholas Konidaris President and Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2006

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and not for any other purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Ricky Chiu, certify that:

1.            I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Eatware Corporation;

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 20, 2006

 

 /s/ Ricky Chiu

Ricky Chiu, President 

(Principal Executive Officer)
STANDARD EXPOSURE REPORT Page 1 of 4 

P-09-0188 Date 2/18/09 

Assessor: C. Flessner

Production Volume: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

Chemical Name: 

Fate Assessment: 

 
 STANDARD EXPOSURE REPORT Page 2 of 4 

P-09-0188 Date 2/18/09 

General Population and Environmental Exposure 

A qualitative evaluation of the releases estimated by CEB indicates that there is some 

potential for exposure to the general population and the environment from water, landfill and/or 

incineration releases as well as fugitive air releases. 

 Human 

inhalation, ingestion and dermal exposure may result from the water, landfill, incineration and 

fugitive releases. 

 It is recommended that the submitter work with EPA engineers, fate experts 

and exposure assessors to develop chemical-specific testing for this PMN chemical. 
 STANDARD EXPOSURE REPORT Page 3 of 4 

P-09-0188 Date 2/18/09 
 STANDARD EXPOSURE REPORT Page 4 of 4 

P-09-0188 Date 2/18/09 

Environmental Releases from the Engineering Report
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1480 

To delay enforcement and establishment of certain water quality standards 

within the Great Bay Estuary, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2011 

Mr. GUINTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To delay enforcement and establishment of certain water 

quality standards within the Great Bay Estuary, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GREAT BAY ESTUARY. 

4 (a) DELAY OF ENFORCEMENT AND ESTABLISH5 MENT.—During the 5-year period beginning on the date 

6 of enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Envi7 ronmental Protection Agency may not— 

8 (1) require a covered treatment works to com9 mence construction on any upgrade of a facility for 

10 the purpose of enforcing water quality standards or 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1480 IH

1 effluent limitations with regard to nitrogen under 

2 section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

3 Act (33 U.S.C. 1342); or 

4 (2) establish any water quality standard or ef5 fluent limitation with regard to nitrogen in the 

6 Great Bay Estuary under title III of such Act (33 

7 U.S.C. 1311 et seq.). 

8 (b) STUDY REQUIRED.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 5 years after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

11 shall conduct, and make available to the public the 

12 results of, a peer-reviewed study regarding eelgrass 

13 levels, and the causes of any loss of eelgrass habitat, 

14 in the Great Bay Estuary. 

15 (2) PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.—The Adminis16 trator shall allow for public participation in the de17 velopment of the study conducted under this sub18 section. 

19 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

20 (1) COVERED TREATMENT WORKS.—The term 

21 ‘‘covered treatment works’’ means a publicly owned 

22 treatment works, as that term is defined in section 

23 212 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 

24 U.S.C. 1292), that contributes nitrogen loadings to 

25 the Great Bay Estuary. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1480 IH

1 (2) GREAT BAY ESTUARY.—The term ‘‘Great 

2 Bay Estuary’’ means the estuarine zone that extends 

3 from the mouth of Portsmouth Harbor, in the vicin4 ity of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, to the head-of5 tide for the 8 rivers (including the tributaries of 

6 those rivers) that flow into Great Bay, Little Bay, 

7 and the Piscataqua River. 

8 (3) ESTUARINE ZONE.—The term ‘‘estuarine 

9 zone’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

10 320(k) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 

11 (33 U.S.C. 1330(k)). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June
30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, Randall Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each
hereby certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: September 19, 2005

/s/ Randall Jones
--------------------------
Randall Jones
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000727069
<NAME>                                         PS PARTNERS II, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                      1
<CURRENCY>                                                    U.S.$
       
<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                           JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                   1
<CASH>                                                    2,785,000
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                22,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          2,807,000
<PP&E>                                                   15,221,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (7,376,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           38,396,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        92,000
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                               38,304,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             38,396,000
<SALES>                                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          7,231,000
<CGS>                                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               993,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            800,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           5,438,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       5,438,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                              5,438,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 38.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 38.34
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(b)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, C. Tim Cassels, state and attest that:



(1) I am the Chief Financial Officer of AmericanWest Bancorporation (the
Registrant).



(2) I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge



| |  |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the periodic report) containing financial statements fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant for the periods
presented.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Name:                |  | /s/ C. Tim Cassels                                  
|Title                |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date: March 14, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.6

               ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

         This assignment and assumption of employment agreements (the
"ASSIGNMENT") is made and entered into as of April 1, 2004 (the "EFFECTIVE
DATE"), by and between Splinex LLC., a Florida limited liability company
("ASSIGNOR"), and Splinex Technology Inc., a Delaware corporation ("ASSIGNEE").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, Assignor entered into employment agreements with the persons
listed on SCHEDULE 1 hereto (collectively, the "AGREEMENTS"); and

         WHEREAS, Assignor desires to assign, transfer, set over and deliver to
Assignee all of Assignor's right, title and interest in and to the Agreements.

         NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee agree as
follows:

         1. Assignor does hereby assign, transfer, set over and deliver unto
Assignee all of the Assignor's right, title and interest in and to the
Agreements.

         2. Effective as of the Effective Date, Assignee hereby assumes all
rights, duties, benefits and obligations under the Agreements.

         3. This Assignment will be construed in accordance with, and be
governed by, the laws of the State of Florida.

         4. This Assignment may be executed in counterparts, each of which will
be deemed to be an original but all of which shall together constitute one and
the same instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page to
this Assignment by facsimile transmission shall be effective delivery of a
manually executed counterpart of this Assignment.

                           (signature page to follow)




<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have caused this Assignment
to be duly executed as of the date first above written.

                                   SPLINEX LLC


                                    By: /s/ Peter Novak
                                        --------------------------------------
                                    Name: Peter Novak
                                        --------------------------------------
                                    Title: Manager
                                        --------------------------------------

                                    SPLINEX TECHNOLOGY INC.


                                    By: /s/ Peter Novak
                                        --------------------------------------
                                    Name: Peter Novak
                                        --------------------------------------
                                    Title: President
                                        --------------------------------------


                                      -2-
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E GU AD AL UP E ME ND OZ AMAR I N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 70826 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 056- 703 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e G ua da l upe M e ndoz a - M ar i n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd is m is s in g h is appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f or c an c e l l a t i o n o f

r e m o v a l . We d i s m i s s th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. 

# FI LED MA R 07 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 70826 2 W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that M e ndoz a - M ar i n f

a i l e d t o s how e xc e pt i ona l a nd e xtr e m e l yunus ua l har ds hi p t o a q u a lif y in g r e la tiv e . See M

art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 42 4 F . 3d 92 6, 93 0 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). M endo za -M ar i n’ s c on t ent i on thatthe agency app l i ed an i ncorrec tl egal s t andar d i n m a ki ng i t s har ds hi p de t e rm i na t i on i s nots upport e d bythe r e c or d and d o e s n o t a m o u n t to ac o lo r ab le le g a l o rc o n s titu tio n a l c la im . See Mendez- Castro v. Mukasey , 55 2 F . 3d 97 5, 98 0 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o con si der M endo za -M ar i n’ s c on t ent i on thatthe IJ ab u sedh er d i scret i o n b y fai l i n g t o g ran ta co n t i n u an ce b ecau se h e fai l edt o ex h au st th a t is s u e b e f

o r e th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU LY 29, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 007 9 1

- CR

George Henry Walker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 119TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial

court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay cost s, no adjudication of costs is

made.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: March 31, 2011                                      |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                      |   |   |   |
| /s/ Wendy Carriere                                        |   |   |   |
|                                                           |   |   |   |
| Wendy CarriereChief Financial OfficerWindGen Energy, Inc. |   |   |   |
|                                                      |   |   |   |

----
Matthew Rodriquez 

Secretary for 

Environmental Protection 

March 21, 2016 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

Regional Administrator 

Air Resources Board 

Mary D. Nichols, Chair 

1001 I Street o P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 o www.arb.ca.gov 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

Governor 

Enclosed is a revision to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP), consisting of 

El Dorado County Air Quality Management District Rule 523-1, Federal Nonattainment 

New Source Review, listed in Enclosure A. The rule was adopted on March 8, 2016. 

Also enclosed is Air Resources Board Executive Order S-16-002 adopting the district's 

rule as a revision to the SIP. To meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency criteria 

for determining that rule submittals are administratively and technically complete, we 

have enclosed evaluations of the effects of the rule on emissions, evaluations of the 

rule's consistency with 40 CFR 51 , and other supporting documentation provided to us 

by the district. One compact disc and one paper copy, each containing the revision in 

its entirety, are enclosed. 

If you have any questions·, please have your staff contact Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief, 

Air Quality Planning and Science Division, at (916) 322-5350 or by email at 

Karen.Magliano@arb.ca.gov. 

Sincerely, 

R1chard ~U/, W. Corey 

Executive Officer 

Enclosures 

cc: See next page. 

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. 

For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.gov. 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

March 21 , 2016 

. Page 2 

cc: Mr. Dave Johnston 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

El Dorado County Air Quality Management District 

330 Fair Lane 

Placerville, California 95667-4100 

Mr. Alan Abbs 

Executive Director 

California Air Pollution Control Officers Association 

1107 Ninth Street, Suite 1005 

Sacramento, California 95814 

Mr. Andy Steckel, Chief 

Rulemaking Office (Air-4), Region 9 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 95105 

Ms. Karen Magliano, Chief 

Air Quality Planning and Science Division