alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.9
                  AMENDMENT TO DEFERRED COMPENSATION AGREEMENT




         This Amendment to Deferred Compensation Agreement dated as of December
18, 2001 amends the Deferred Compensation Agreement dated as of September 18,
2001 (the "Agreement") entered into between Merisel, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), and Timothy N. Jenson ("Executive").

         The Company and Executive hereby agree as follows:

1.       Paragraph 1(a)(i) of the Agreement is amended to replace "$1,000,000"
         with "$700,000".

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Deferred Compensation Agreement, as of the day and year first written above.

MERISEL, INC.


By:
   __________________________________________
      Karen A. Tallman
      Senior Vice President


TIMOTHY N. JENSON




______________________________________________
**Exhibit
      21.1**




**SUBSIDIARIES**




Langer
      Inc., a Delaware corporation, owns 100% of the outstanding stock of each of
      the
      following corporations:






|1. | Langer
              Canada Inc., a New Brunswick (Canada)
              Corporation.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Langer
      Canada Inc., owns 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Bi-Op laboratories,
      Inc., a Quebec (Canada) corporation.




|2. | Langer
              Distribution Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (formerly known
              as
              GoodFoot Acquisition Co.)
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Langer
              Professional Services, Inc., a Delaware
              Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Regal
              Medical Supply, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company,
              (successor by merger to Regal Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation
              formerly known as Regal Acquisition Co.).
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Silipos,
              Inc., a Delaware corporation.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------



Silipos,
      Inc., owns 100% of the outstanding capital stock of Silipos (UK), Ltd., an
      English limited liability company.


6.
            Twincraft,
                Inc., a Vermont corporation.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report, dated May 19,
1999, relating to the consolidated financial statements of First Citizens
Corporation and subsidiaries for the three years ended March 31, 1999, included
in this Form 10-K in the previously filed Registration Statements of First
Citizens Corporation on Form S-8 (No. 333-36765 and 333-37099) and Form S-3 (No.
333-35197 and 333-52207).

                                                    /s/ Mauldin & Jenkins, LLC


Atlanta, Georgia
June 29, 1999
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Tim Burroughs, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of TBX Resources, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the
registrant, including its
consolidating subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report
was prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly
report (the Evaluation Date); andc)
    presented in this quarterly report
our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on the
required evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)
    all significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect
the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified
for the registrants auditors any
material weaknesses in internal
controls; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role
in the registrants internal
controls; and  6.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard
to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. Dated this 20th day of April 2005 /s/ Tim Burroughs
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 50138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20010]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity 
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits

    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending July 27, 2013. The 
following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0145.
    Date Filed: July 24, 2013.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: August 14, 2013.
    Description: Application of Comlux Aruba N.V. (``Comlux Aruba'') 
requesting a foreign air carrier permit and an exemption authorizing 
Comlux Aruba to conduct the following services: (a) Foreign charter air 
transportation of persons, property, and mail between any point or 
points in Aruba and any point or points in the United States, and 
between any point or points in the United States and any point or 
points in any third country or countries, provided that, except with 
respect to cargo charters, such service constitutes part of a 
continuous operation, with or without change of aircraft, that includes 
service to Aruba for purpose of carrying local traffic between Aruba 
and the United States; (b) and other charters pursuant to the prior 
approval requirements set forth in the Department's regulations 
governing charters.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-20010 Filed 8-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tribune Media Company (the “Company”) for the period ended December 28, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Steven Berns, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:


(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Steven Berns


Steven Berns


Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 6, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006
as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2006                  By:      /s/ Daniel R. Dwight
                                                  ------------------------------
                                         Name:    Daniel R. Dwight
                                         Title:   Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sherb & Co., LLP and
will be retained by Sherb & Co. LLP and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

The undersigned hereby certifies thatAmendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Form 10-K Annual Report of MandalayResort Group (the “Company”) for the annual period ended January 31, 2003 filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Date: June 25, 2003 |   | /s/ GLENN SCHAEFFER                             |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Glenn Schaeffer,  President, Chief Financial    |
|                |   | Officer and Treasurer of  Mandalay Resort Group |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Mandalay Resort Group and will beretained by Mandalay Resort Group and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### H. C. CRAMER, Appellant, v. CITY OF CATLETTSBURG, Kentucky, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 29, 1957.

John L. Smith, Catlettsburg, for appellant.

James E. Adkins, Catlettsburg, for ap-pellees.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The City of Catlettsburg, a city of the ' fourth class, has a floating outstanding indebtedness in the sum of $32,191.26 bearing interest at the rate of six per cent. On January 7, 1957, the city council enacted an ordinance authorizing the payment of part of this indebtedness out of current revenues and the balance by the sale of $27,000 in refunding bonds bearing interest not in excess of five per cent per annum, maturing at a rate of $1,000 annually over the years 1958 to 1985 inclusive.

The appellant, a citizen and taxpayer of Catlettsburg, brought this suit seeking to enjoin the appellee city from issuing the bonds on the ground that their issuance would result in the creation of a debt in excess of revenue for the current year. Sections 157 and 158 of the Kentucky Constitution.

The city’s answer and proof conformed with the requirements of KRS 66.220. The pleadings set forth each year’s anticipated revenue and the amount expended for each year. It was shown that, due to failure in collecting anticipated revenue for the years 1951 through 1956, a valid indebtedness had accrued in the amount of $32,191.26. In *556none of the years involved did the expenditures exceed the anticipated revenue. See, section 157, Kentucky Constitution.

The record reveals that the total assessed valuation of taxable property of the city was $4,025,508.50 and that the total outstanding indebtedness including the proposed bond issue was $191,334.15. Thus, the total amount of -indebtedness would not he in excess of that allowed by section 158 of our Constitution. It was also shown that the fiscal officers of the city had demonstrated due regard for the financial interests of the city as required by KRS 66.220.

The circuit court denied the injunction and found the proposed bond -issue to be valid in every respect. Under the record the adjudication made by the circuit court appears to be correct. See, Booth v. City of Carrollton, 272 Ky. 250, 114 S.W.2d 93; and Field v. City of Catlettsburg, 270 Ky. 25, 108 S.W.2d 1017.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1435 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1435

   To amend chapter 141 of title 10, United States Code, to include 
 disclosures made by Department of Defense contract employees to their 
  immediate employers in the provisions providing protections against 
                   reprisals for certain disclosures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 7, 2011

   Mr. Smith of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend chapter 141 of title 10, United States Code, to include 
 disclosures made by Department of Defense contract employees to their 
  immediate employers in the provisions providing protections against 
                   reprisals for certain disclosures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION FOR DISCLOSURES MADE BY DEFENSE 
              CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES TO EMPLOYERS.

    Section 2409(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``the employer of the employee,'' after ``disclosing to''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
financial statements of Amarillo Mesquite Grill, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
January 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         407,710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    169,027
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               768,758
<PP&E>                                      10,376,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,998,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,873,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,572,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        83,011
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,532,622
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,873,451
<SALES>                                     18,355,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,355,305
<CGS>                                        6,374,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,861,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             642,724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (369,097)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (369,097)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FELIPE DE JESUS LAMAS FLORES;

EMELIA GARCIA DE LAMAS,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

Nos. 05-70324

 05-74221

Agency Nos. A077-374-934

 A077-374-935

ORDER

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Lamas Flores and Garcia de Lamas’ petition for panel rehearing is granted.

The memorandum disposition filed on April 14, 2010, is withdrawn. An amended

memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

FILED

AUG 09 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11 Statement re Computation of per share earnings
SCPIE Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
(in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          1997        1996(1)     1995(1)
                                          ----        ------       ------
<S>                                     <C>          <C>          <C>
Net Income                              $ 32,176     $ 30,192     $ 24,369

Weighted average number of
   common stock outstanding               12,108       10,000       10,000

Basic Earnings Per Share                $   2.66     $   3.02     $   2.44
                                        ========     ========     =========

Diluted Earnings Per Share (2)          $      -     $      -     $       -
                                        ========     ========     =========
</TABLE>

(1) The weighted average number of common stock oustanding gives effect to the
Company's reorganization including the allocation of approximately 10,000,000
shares of common stock to members of Southern California Physicians Insurance
Exchange.

(2) The Company does not have diluted earnings per share as it has only common
stock outstanding.
#### James B. ERVIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27749.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 2, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., C. S. Potts, Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas, Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Murder with malice is the offense; the punishment, forty years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            9439
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  2281
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     184995
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           12516
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             12814
<LOANS>                                         219413
<ALLOWANCE>                                       4529
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  446349
<DEPOSITS>                                      304351
<SHORT-TERM>                                     10189
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               6978
<LONG-TERM>                                      91401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1321
<OTHER-SE>                                       32109
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  446349
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  21243
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 9525
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 30836
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               11671
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16480
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            14356
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      710
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                1338
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   9496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8116
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        6147
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      6147
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.89
<LOANS-NON>                                        562
<LOANS-PAST>                                         4
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   4746
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  4134
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      330
<RECOVERIES>                                        15
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 4529
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              4529
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           1090
        


</TABLE>