alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            



|Date: November 9, 2009
|----------------------



|/s/ Andrew C. FrenetteAndrew C. FrenetteChief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                I, Robert L.Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q forthe fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date: November 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT L. HOWARD-ANDERSON         |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                    | Name:  | Robert L. Howard-Anderson             |
|                    | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

                I, Christopher B.Farrell, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the QuarterlyReport of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairlypresents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date: November 14, 2007 | By:    | /s/ CHRISTOPHER B. FARRELL |
|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                    | Name:  | Christopher B. Farrell     |
|                    | Title: | Chief Financial Officer    |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will beretained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### Virgil TURNER, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE AND PROBATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 15, 1965.

*890Virgil Turner, pro se.

Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., Charles W. Runyan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PALMORE, Judge.

This is an original action in which Virgil Turner seeks a writ of mandamus requiring the parole authorities of the state to restore him to a parole status which he says was revoked arbitrarily and illegally. In a previous habeas corpus case brought for the same ultimate purpose we noted that the record was not sufficient for us to reach the question of arbitrary treatment. Turner v. Thomas, Ky., 383 S.W.2d 379 (1964).

The power of this court under Const. § 110 to give relief in the nature of mandamus or prohibition can be exercised only against judicial officers. Commonwealth ex rel. Breckinridge v. Wise, Ky., 351 S.W.2d 491 (1961); Stafford v. Bailey, 282 Ky. 528, 138 S.W.2d 999 (1940). Actions against other officers must be brought in the appropriate court of general jurisdiction. Cf. Hettich v. Colson, Ky., 366 S.W.2d 907 (1963); Reese v. Lawless, 7 Ky. (4 Bibb) 394 (1816). Moreover, proceedings of this nature must be brought against the individual member or members of the agency whose actions are sought to be controlled. Lewis v. Board of Councilmen of Frankfort, 305 Ky. 509, 204 S.W.2d 813 (1947). For all of these reasons the instant application must be rejected.

Mandamus is denied.
Exhibit 31.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Steven Berns, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Tribune Media Company;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;


4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:


a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;


b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





/s/ Steven Berns


Steven Berns


Chief Financial Officer


Date: March 6, 2015
#### Ex parte Mike BARCLAY.

No. 38231.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 14, 1965.

Sam Houston Clinton, Jr., Austin, for respondent.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding originally presented to this Court seeking release from confinement under an order of a district judge adjudging the petitioner in contempt of court and ordering his confinement in jail for 24 hours and until a fine of $100 was paid.

After we set the case for hearing on the question of whether the writ should issue, the petitioner filed in this Court his affidavit to the effect that he had satisfied the judgment of contempt and requested that his petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.

The question being moot, the request is granted and the petition for habeas corpus is dismissed.
[No. 35194.

Department Two.

February 4, 1960.]

#### Helen C. Beagle, *Plaintiff,*v. Harvey L. Beagle, *Defendant and Relator,*The Superior Court for King County, *William J. Wilkins, Judge, Respondent.**1*

*Cartano, Botzer & Chapman (Robert A. O’Neill,*of counsel), for plaintiff.

*Zundel, Merges, Brain & Isaac,*for defendant and relator.

1

Reported in 349 P. (2d) 241.

Per Curiam.

Respondent moves to strike the statement of facts from the record on appeal for the reason that it was not timely filed, in accordance with Rule on Appeal 34, RCW, Vol. 0. The proposed statement of facts was filed more than ninety days after entry of the decree. No application for extension of time for filing was filed within the ninety-day period, or at all. See *Beagle v. Beagle, ante*p. 174, 346 P. (2d) 689 (1959).

In the exercise of our discretion (since the timely filing of a statement of facts is no longer jurisdictional), we deny the motion to strike the statement of facts; but, pursuant to Rule on Appeal 7, RCW, Vol. 0, we impose upon appellant’s counsel, for failure to observe the Rules on Appeal, terms of one hundred dollars to be paid to respondent’s counsel as attorney’s fees.

It is so ordered.
#### Francisca R. PEREZ, a feme sole, Appellant, v. H. G. GEORGE et al., Appellees.

No. 118.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Corpus Christi.

*Nov. 25, 1964.*

M. F. Armstrong, Jr., Weslaco, Raymond E. Ehrlich, Pharr, for appellant.

J. D. Vollmer, Mercedes, for appellees.

SHARPE, Justice.

This cause is before the Court on ap-pellees’ motion to affirm on certificate. The judgment involved was rendered in Cause Number B-21615, District Court, Hidalgo *County,*Texas, in which Francisca R. Perez, a feme sole was plaintiff and H. G. George, Eli Rios, E. E. Vickers, sheriff of Hidalgo County, Texas, R. G. Perez, Truett Jordan, each a deputy sheriff of Hidalgo County, Texas, were defendants. Said judgment entered on April 22, 1964, provided that the plaintiff take nothing by her suit against the defendants H. G. George and Eli Rios. The case as to R. G. Perez and Truett Jordan in their individual capacities was dismissed with prejudice. Notice of appeal by appellant was included in the judgment and on May 21, 1964, appellant filed a proper appeal bond in the Court below. Since then the appellant has taken no steps to proceed with the appeal and has not filed the record or a motion for extension herein in connection with the same. The time for appeal by writ of error has also expired.

Appellees’ motion to affirm on certificate is accompanied by proper instruments in accordance with Rule 387, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Notice, as provided in said rule, has been given of the setting of this cause for hearing and appellant has failed to appear. Appellees are entitled to have their motion granted and the judgment of the trial court affirmed. Rule 387, T.R.C.P.; Edwards v. Hughes, 377 S.W. 2d 235 (Tex.Civ.App.1964, n.w.h.).

*901The judgment of the trial court is affirmed and the costs of this appeal are adjudged against appellant and the sureties on her appeal bond.
#### Roberta MAY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Sept. 21, 1956.

C. F. See, Jr., Louisa, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. 'Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Roberta May was convicted on a second offense for illegal possession of intoxi-eating liquor in local option territory. The punishment imposed was 120 days in jail and a fine of $100. She has moved for an appeal and seeks reversal of the judgment.

The record and briefs have been read and examined. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the charge. No error has been found.

The motion, therefore, is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
# z^iaho n net-iric M 121 H - M aNLNu m Augus t 1,201 1 • " i ;• ' 'C' ' I T O " • ' I i Viri-,' ! \j. r

••• . ' ••Jiii/\ilL' i •icrFPAiio:,: - 0 - 3 P ? : 1 8

U.S . Departmen t

of Transportatio n Docke t Managemen t

Syste m 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mW12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Re : Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n(FAA ) Drug/Alcoho l Polic y an dProgra m T o Who mI t

Ma y Concern : DA EAviatio nEnterprises.Corporatio n(dba.Emerso nAviation ) i s aful l servic e fixe d bas e operato r

a t Laconi aAirpor t

(LCI ) an dit s service s includ e 13 5 on-deman dai r tax i an dsceni c tour s o f

th e area . W e currentl y hav e twelv e employee s o f whic hte nperfor m safety-sensitiv e function s covere dunde r th e FA ADru g an dAlcoho l Program . Becaus e o f

th e rang e o f

service s w e provide , w e ar e no w require db y th e FA At o administe r

dru g program s unde r bot h1 4 CF RPar t

13 5 an dPar t

91.147 . Thi s duplicatio nrequire s th e compan y t o administe r tw o programs , an dbecaus e w e ar e a smal l company , create s th e possibilit y o f th e sam e employe e bein g calle dfo r testin g uiide r bot hprogram s i nth e sam e quarter . Thi s defeat s th e inten t o f th e progra mt o tes t a s man y employee s a s possible . We believ e consolidatin g thes e program s woul d enhanc e overal l safet y b y allowin g th e consortiu mt o pic k a s man y individual s a s possible . Thi s als o create s cos t inefficienc y tha t

affect s th e abilit y o f

th e compan y t o provid e affordabl e aviatio nservice s t o th e community . I f yo u hav e question s o r requir e furthe r

information , pleas e d o no t hesitat e t o contac t m e o r Lind aEmerso na t

lemerson@emer8onaviation.coin .

Davi dEmerso n Presiden t DA EAVL\TIO NENTERPI^SE S COR P demerson@emersonaviation . co m

Lacom aAirpor t • 11 8 Kimball Roa

d• Gilfor dN H 0324 9 • Tel : 603-293-798 0 • Fax : 603-293-080 5
#### John R. LEE et al., Appellants, v. Jesse ADAMS, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 31, 1958.

*758John W. Murphy, Jr., Liberty, Fred Faulkner, Sr., Campbellsville, for appellants.

Ira L. Pittman, Liberty, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Mqtion for an appeal from a judgment of the Casey Circuit Court, Hon. James C. Carter, Jr.,. Judge, decreeing appellee, Jesse Adams, to be the owner by adverse possession of a tract of. land containing one and two-thirds acres, worth $400, and restraining appellants, John R. Lee and wife, from making any further claim to this small parcel of land.

This is purely a fact case with conflicting evidence, but an examination of the record convinces us that it amply supports the judgment of the trial judge.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

MONTGOMERY, J., not sitting.
#### Charles Edward LOWE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27875.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, ■for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record on appeal contains no statement ■ of ■ facts or bills of exception.’- All proceedings appear to be regular-and nothing is presented for review.1 The judgment is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,762
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,870
<PP&E>                                              80
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 280,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,400
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,069
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,734)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,335
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   496
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,944)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,944)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (3,495)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (4,660)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Live Current Media Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Geoffrey Hampson, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company and the Chairman of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ C. Geoffrey Hampson


C. Geoffrey Hampson


Chief Executive Officer


September 17, 2009
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Widespread Humanitarian Crisis in Afghanistan and the Potential for a Deepening Economic Collapse in Afghanistan

                    On February 11, 2022, by Executive Order 14064, I declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the widespread humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan and the potential for a deepening economic collapse in Afghanistan.                

The widespread humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan—including the urgent needs of the people of Afghanistan for food security, livelihoods support, water, sanitation, health, hygiene, and shelter and settlement assistance, among other basic human needs—and the potential for a deepening economic collapse in Afghanistan continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. In addition, the preservation of certain property of Da Afghanistan Bank (DAB) held in the United States by United States financial institutions is of the utmost importance to addressing this national emergency and the welfare of the people of Afghanistan. Various parties, including representatives of victims of terrorism, have asserted legal claims against certain property of DAB or indicated in public court filings an intent to make such claims. This property is blocked under Executive Order 14064.

For these reasons, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14064 of February 11, 2022, must continue in effect beyond February 11, 2024. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 14064 with respect to the widespread humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan and the potential for a deepening economic collapse in Afghanistan.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2024-02845

Billing code 3395-F4-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12323]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Korean Couture: Generations of Revolution” at the Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-02729 Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P