alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,070
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     25,720
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         51,183
<ALLOWANCE>                                       (908)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,051
<DEPOSITS>                                      73,120
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,108
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,356
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  84,051
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,732
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,567
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   155
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,454
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,428
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,026
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      511
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,326
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                         87
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   538
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     (287)
<RECOVERIES>                                       146 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  908
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            432
        

</TABLE>
From: Richard S Vickery < Richard.S.Vickery- 1@USA.dupont.com >

To: Bill Neuffer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: John A Dege <John.A.Dege@usa.dupont.com > Date: 01/16/2012 09:48 PM Subject: DuPont Nitric Acid Plant NOx Data - Pascagoula

Bill, Attached is data concerning NOx emissions from the DuPont Pascagoula nitric acid plant. It is a small, single - pressu re plant with SCR control. Data concerning our Beaumont nitric acid plant is almost complete and I should have it to you soon. It is a small, single - pressure plant with NSCR control. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Regards, Ric k (See attached file: DuPont - FCC Pascagoula NOx Emission Data rev1.xls)(See attached file: Pascagoula Data Sheet.doc)(See attached file: Pascagoula NOx test 2 - 22 - 2011.pdf)

========================================== Richard S. Vickery, P.E. Air Quality C onsultant DuPont Engineering Research and Technology (DuET) DuPont Building - D12036 - 1 1007 Market Street Wilmington, DE 19898 (302)774 - 9829 richard.s.vickery - 1@usa.dupont.com This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e -mai l, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e -mail and delete this e -mail from your system. Unless explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E - Contract Intended", this e -mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e -mail does not constitute a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for transfers of data to third parties. Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Por tugues Japanese Chinese Korean

http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 349

To reauthorize appropriations for the Navajo-Hopi Relocation Housing

Program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 2 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. KYL) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To reauthorize appropriations for the Navajo-Hopi

Relocation Housing Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

4 THE NAVAJO-HOPI RELOCATION HOUSING

5 PROGRAM.

6 Section 25(a)(8) of Public Law 93–531 (25 U.S.C.

7 640d–24(a)(8)) is amended by striking ‘‘1989,’’ and all

8 that follows through ‘‘and 1995.’’ and inserting ‘‘1995,

9 1996, and 1997.’’.

Æ
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SH A U N TA E TA Y LO R, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. T . V I R G A ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16450 D . C. N o . 2 : 1 0 - CV - 0 2 7 3 1 - W BSGG H ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia W i l l i a m B . S hubb, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J anuary17, 2012 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S haun t ae T ay l or, a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e nti n hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on a l l e gi ng tha thi s hous i ng a s s i gnm e nt s vi ol a t e d hi s c ons t i tut i ona l r i ght s . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 

# FI LED JAN 24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 16450 2 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d is m is s a l u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 A . R es ni ck

v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F. 3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o p e r lyd is m is s e dT ay lo r ’s f a ilu r e - to - p r o te c t c la im b e c au s e T ay lo rf

a ile dto a lle g e f

a c ts s h o w in g th a t d e f

e n d an ts w e r e d e lib e r a te ly in d if f e r e n t to as ub s tan tia l r is ko f s e r io u s h arm b ya s s ig n in g T ay lo rto ad o ub le c e ll. Se e Farm e rv . B r e nnan , 511 U . S . 825, 837 ( 1994) ( “ [ A ] pr i s on of f i c i a l c annot be f ound l i abl e [ f

oraf a i l ur e t o pr e ve ntharm ] unl e s s the of f i c i a l know s of

and di sr egar ds an exces si ve ri sk t o i nm at e hea l th o r s af ety[ . ] ”) . T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y d i sm i ssedT ayl o r’ s du e p ro cess cl ai m b ecau se T ay l orf a i l e d t o a l l e ge f

a c t s s how i ng tha tanyof hi s hous i ng c l a s s i f

i c a t i ons i m po se d an atypi ca l and si gn i fi canthardshi p o n h i m i n rel at i on t o the ordi nary in c id e n ts o f

p r is o n lif

e . Se e Sandi n v . C onnor , 5 1 5 U .S . 4 7 2 , 4 8 6 ( 1 9 9 5 ) . T ay l or’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s, i ncl ud i ng tho se re gardi ng j ud i ci albi as , ar e un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) theinformation contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 6, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will beretained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
State of Israel 

Ministry of Transport 

Civil Aviation Authority 

Page 1 of 2

 

 AD 31-06-11-05 

 Date: May 27, 2009

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

 

This Airworthiness Directive, issued by the Civil Aviation Authority in accordance with the 

Israeli Aviation Regulations, applies to an aircraft for which our records list you as the registered 

owner. It affects aviation safety and requires your immediate attention. No person may operate an 

aircraft to which an Airworthiness Directive applies, except in accordance with that Directive. 

APPLIES TO: Gulfstream Aerospace LP (GALP) Models 1125 ASTRA, ASTRA SPX 

and G100 aircraft, all serial numbers except S/N 158, certificated in any 

category. 

SUBJECT: Separation of Main Entry Door (MED) and MED Inflateable Seal warning 

lights. 

REASON: To increase pilots' awareness to the possibility of incomplete closure of the 

Main Entry Door (MED) by the following means: 

1. Splitting the common caution light CABIN DOOR signaling both MED 

Improper Closure and MED Inflatable Seal Failure into two separate 

lights: CABIN DOOR and CABIN DOOR SEAL. 

2. Converting the separated CABIN DOOR Caution light into a Warning 

light by changing its color to red. 

 NOTE: Aircraft Flight Manuals (AFM'S) refer to these changes as 

 MOD G1-20052. 

Incomplete closure of the MED may be followed by in-flight opening of 

the door. As a result, the MED and the adjacent fuselage structure may be 

damaged during opening and landing impact. 

Damage to the left engine by flying debris and objects may also occur. 

ACTION: Unless previously accomplished, perform the changes listed below in 

accordance with Gulfstream Service Bulletin 100-31-284. 

 Modify the Warning & Caution Lights Panel (WACLP). 

Change the WACLP and MED wiring. 

 Change the wiring harness connecting the MED to the WACLP. 

Verify that the Log of Modification of the AFM includes reference to 

MOD G1-20052. If no reference is found, update the AFM. 
State of Israel 

Ministry of Transport 

Civil Aviation Authority 

Page 2 of 2

 

 AD 31-06-11-05 

 

COMPLIANCE: Compliance with this AD is required within 250 flight hours after the 

effective date of this AD. 

EFECTIVE DATE: June 10, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. N. Kletshevsky, Engineering and 

Manufacturing Branch, CAAI - P.O.Box 8, Ben-Gurion Airport, Israel 70150. 

Telephone: 972-3-9774-539, Fax: 972-3-9774-592, e-mail: kletshn@mot.gov.il.
EXHIBIT 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of
Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
     31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.

Date:  May 10, 2005

                                  /s/ James L. O'Connor
                                  ---------------------
                                  James L. O'Connor
                                  Chief Financial Officer




A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to the Fund  and will be  retained  by the Fund and  furnished  to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF EXECUTONE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.


                               JURISDICTION OF    %
NAME                            INCORPORATION   OWNERSHIP    BUSINESS


Unistar Gaming Corporation       Delaware        100%       Holding Company
478 Wheelers Farms Road 
Milford, CT  06460-1847


Unistar Entertainment, Inc.       Idaho          100%      Lottery Management
478 Wheelers Farms Road 
Milford, CT 06460-1847


All listed subsidiaries do business only under their corporate names listed 
above. Certain inactive and immaterial subsidiaries, which if considered 
in the aggregate as a single subsidiary would not constitute a "significant 
subsidiary" as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of the Commission as of 
December 31, 1997, are not listed.

    
   

<PAGE>
Order entered May 6 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 01603 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF Z .M.C. AND R.B.C., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199 - 529 80 - 2008



### O RDER Before the Court is Niles Illich’s April 23, 2014 motion to withdraw and motion to extend time to file brief. To the extent Mr. Illich seeks to withdraw as counsel for appellant, we DENY the motion without prejudice to refiling a motion th at complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5. We GRANT the request for additional time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than June 16, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8228]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02371]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3603-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Virgin Islands; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FEMA-3603-DR), dated November 
18, 2023, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued January 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective January 23, 2024.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-02371 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### James Ray JONES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 36072.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1963.

E. Colley Sullivan, Charles E. Tobin (On Appeal Only), Phil Burleson, (On Appeal" Only), Dallas, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Louis Francis,. Mark Troy, Jr., and A. D. Bowie, Asst. *884Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is carrying on or about his person a pistol; the punishment, one year.

Acting upon information which they had received, two policemen of the City of Dallas brought an automobile occupied by six colored males to a halt. The policemen testified that the appellant was the driver of the automobile and got out on the left hand side, while some of the other occupants emerged on the right hand side.

The pistol, which forms the basis of this prosecution, was discovered on the ground on the right hand side of the automobile. Another weapon was found on the ground on the right hand side of the automobile and still others under the back seat. Ammunition of the same caliber as the pistol was found in the automobile, but was not shown to have been near where appellant was seated or within his view.

We have concluded that the facts are not sufficient to support the conviction here alleged. Appellant was never shown to have exercised any control over the weapon or to have known of its presence or the presence of the ammunition in the automobile.

The State relies upon Hill v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 540, 278 S.W.2d 842, which involved the possession of a bomb which was discovered on the front floorboard of the automobile driven by the appellant, and which was clearly within his view. In the case at bar, as in Summerville v. State, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 591, 301 S.W.2d 913, there were other occupants of the automobile, and the pistol was not shown to be in the custody or view of the accused, and it was not shown that he was aware of its presence therein.

Because the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
#### Ruby McCISSELL, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 4, 1957.

*757Vert C. Fraser, Providence, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ruby McCissell, was convicted in the Webster Circuit Court of the offense •of possessing alcoholic beverages for the purpose of sale in local option territory. The punishment imposed was a fine of $100 and 30 days in jail.

The principal question concerns the sufficiency of the affidavit and search warrant which did not describe particularly an automobile found on the premises described in the affidavit.

We have this day held in the case of Massey v. Commonwealth, 305 S.W.2d 755, that it is not necessary to describe the automobile found on the premises searched under a warrant otherwise valid and that opinion is controlling here.

The record discloses that the verdict was based upon sufficient evidence.

The motion for appeal is therefore overruled and the judgment affirmed.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 13 - 00538 - CR NO. 02 - 13 - 00539 - CR

FREDDIE RODRIQUEZ APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM THE 297TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO S . 1292777D, 1339 641D

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- The trial court convicted Appellant Freddie Rodriguez of failure to register as a sex offender and bail jumping, found both habitual offender notices true, and sentenced him to forty

- five years’ confinement fo r each offense. Rodriguez ’s court

- appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in support of that motion. Counsel avers that in h is

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

professional opinion, the se appeal s are frivolous. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirem ents of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds for relief. See 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). This court informed Rodriguez that he may file a pro se response to th e Anders brief, and he did so. The State did not submit a brief. Once an appellant’s court

- appointed attorney files a motion to withdraw on the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders , this court is obligated to undert ake an independent examination of the record. See Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State , 904 S.W.2d 920, 922

– 23 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). Only then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw . See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). We have carefully reviewed the record , counsel’s brief , and the pro se response

. We agree with counsel that these appeal s are wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal s

. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 827

– 28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also Meza v. State , 206 S.W.3d 684, 685 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court ’s judgment s

. /s/ Bill Meier
B ILL MEIER JUSTICE3

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MEIER, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: May 28 , 2015
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-3576-15T3

STATE OF NEW JERSEY,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

VINCENT D. BANKS,

a/k/a RYHIM JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________

Submitted November 15, 2017 – Decided

Before Judges Fuentes, Koblitz and Manahan.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, 

Law Division, Bergen County, Indictment No. 

13-10-1416.

Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender, attorney 

for appellant (Rebecca Gindi, Assistant Deputy 

Public Defender, of counsel and on the 

briefs).

Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General, 

attorney for respondent (Sarah E. Ross, Deputy 

Attorney General, of counsel and on the 

brief).

PER CURIAM

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." 

Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the 

parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.

November 29, 2017
2 A-3576-15T3

We have been advised prior to argument that this matter has 

been amicably adjusted and the parties have stipulated to the 

dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed 

with prejudice and without costs.