alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS WITH REGARD TO HALIS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

                              TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                            3340 Peachtree Road, N.E.
                                    Suite 250
                                Atlanta, GA 30326

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report to the Board of
Directors and Stockholders of Halis, Inc. and Subsidiaries dated March 1, 2001
accompanying the Consolidated Financial Statements of Halis, Inc. as of December
31, 2000 and 1999, included in the June 30, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for HealthWatch, Inc.

/s/ Tauber & Balser, P.C.
----------------------------
TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia
October 15, 2001
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTINHonorableTo-2 C. Kins, pa,vo

2

of $2,500.00 for sach moabar of the Board during each year of tho current biennium. QpSour

0pirrPon is respectfullyrequested as follol!:s: "1. Is the appropriationto be read in the light of the gcncral stztuts, so as to co~clud0 that the LeSLslatureappropriated $2,500.60, Or-~0 '.7UCilthC:xeOf LIS?,Oybs P.EC6amry for the pnyrcknt Of 0 par dfcz~;

or "2. Ecs there a valfii apprcp% tion of a sal%ry OS l/12 of $2,500 per sonth for w~oh member?" It is uur opinion that the I,e&islctur~, by providingin the Ee~sr%&nl;a~l Appropriation

Eill for the currsnt bienniu:3 (5mata Dill Zo. 427, 1&h Legislature)an nppropriationof $5?,5GO~ TOI’ CXIC~Gf the threemombors of the BtEsLe l3oard of Bairdre~sorsand CCWr~tOlG~i8tS, inlxuded that this ~-,o;;ey should be disbursedin uccorilnnc3 with the twxxz of Sc;cGion 7 of articl.6 73&b, Swmntt: Annotatc,d Penal Code, 1::hich YGU qUGt0 in your latter. The general Lav: on the cubjcot vcould

ordinarilyprevail ever a occflictingprovision in the a~proprintlon bill. -2%

d0 Cot, hGWaVC!r, believethat tbess is any conflfctbctwcn the lx;o. The general ridor to the DepartxsntolAp;briipriotkoJl Bill (at totto of jX$!.o I./+6 of I;ha Su~:~plems to the ScnstoJournal for June 13, 2339) contains the folloxing provision:

"The approgriaticnn herein provided ore to ts oon:;trucd. as the llsxinram

su3s to 33 a::prspriated, to and for the swer'~I. purposcr,

rramod hercin'~

* *I1. . -

CabQlini., 11~5 morass 472, 170 S. V. 1036:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
<CIK>                               0000725262    
<NAME>                              DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1984-2 LTD PSHP
                                     
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                    41,331
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                             32,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          73,511
<PP&E>                                23,983,461
<DEPRECIATION>                        23,616,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           470,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      7,112
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                               453,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             470,729
<SALES>                                  281,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         284,795
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            205,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           79,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       79,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              79,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              15.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        
 

</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 467

For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 23 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDING AND PURPOSE.

4 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that Benchmark Rail

5 Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, satisfactorily per6 formed emergency work in California after the Northridge

7 earthquake on January 17, 1994, but has not been reim8 bursed as a result of a technicality under California State

9 law.

10 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to fairly

11 compensate Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the work for
2

•S 467 IS

1 which, except for the technicality under California State

2 law, Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., would otherwise have

3 been paid under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief

4 and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

5 SEC. 2. PAYMENT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

7 date of enactment of this Act, the Director of the Federal

8 Emergency Management Agency shall pay to Benchmark

9 Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, an amount equal

10 to the total amount owed to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.,

11 by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the

12 State of California to compensate Benchmark Rail Group,

13 Inc., for the emergency work and services performed at

14 the request of the Southern California Regional Rail Au15 thority, to the extent that the work and services are other16 wise eligible for reimbursement under the Robert T. Staf17 ford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42

18 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.). The payment shall be made from

19 funds made available to carry out the Act.

20 (b) DEOBLIGATION OF FUNDS.—The Director of the

21 Federal Emergency Management Agency shall deobligate

22 an amount equal to the amount obligated prior to the date

23 of enactment of this Act for payment to the State of Cali24 fornia to cover the costs of emergency work and services

25 performed at the request of the Southern California Re-
3

•S 467 IS

1 gional Rail Authority by Benchmark Rail Group, Inc.,

2 after the Northridge earthquake on January 17, 1994,

3 that would have been eligible for reimbursement under the

4 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assist5 ance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

Æ
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


[THE BANK OF GLEN BURNIE LETTERHEAD]


 


March 14, 2017


 


Mr. Jeffrey D. Harris


2908 Sissinghurst Place


Upper Marlboro, Md. 20774


 


Dear Jeffrey,


 


On behalf of The Bank of Glen Burnie and the Board of
Directors, it is my pleasure to offer you the position of Chief Financial Officer/Senior Vice President, reporting to John D. Long,
President/CEO. This position has an annual salary of $155,000.00, which will be paid to you on a bi-weekly basis (less withheld
taxes as required by law and such other amounts as you authorize in writing to be deducted).


 


The bonus plan for 2017 and beyond, should such a plan
exist, is based upon the goals and objectives agreed to in the performance development planning process with John D. Long and Board
approval.


 


Merit increases with The Bank of Glen Burnie are implemented
on a common date in November of each year for Senior Management. Evaluations and merit increases are predicated upon performance
during the preceding fiscal year.


 


As a full-time salaried employee, you are eligible to
participate in the following plans: Medical, Dental, Vision, Short Term, Long Term Disability, 401(k), Group Term Life, Accidental
Death and Dismemberment, Flexible Spending Account and Annual Leave. Details of these plans will be communicated to you in the
orientation packet.


 


Your employment with The Bank of Glen Burnie is at-will
and either party can terminate the relationship at any time with or without notice. You acknowledge that this offer letter represents
the entire agreement between you and The Bank of Glen Burnie. This offer letter does not constitute a contract of employment for
any period of time and constitutes the full commitments that have been extended to you.


 


Should you have any questions please contact me at 410-768-8855.
The skills and knowledge you will bring with you will be a definite asset to our organization. We look forward to having you join
the Bank.


 


If you are in agreement with the above outline, kindly
indicate your understanding and acceptance of our offer by signing below and returning a copy in the enclosed envelope within seven
(7) days of receipt.


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/


 


Michelle R. Stambaugh


SVP, Director Human Resources


 


I agree to the terms of the employment above.


 


	 	/s/	 
	 	Jeffrey Harris	 
	 	 	3/21/17	 
	 	Date	 
	 	 	3/30/17	 
	 	Employment Date
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 556 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 556

   To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to improve the provision of trade 
   readjustment allowances during breaks in training, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 14 (legislative day, March 6), 1995

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to improve the provision of trade 
   readjustment allowances during breaks in training, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Trade Adjustment Assistance Program 
Improvement Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF TRADE READJUSTMENT ALLOWANCES DURING BREAKS IN 
              TRAINING.

    Section 233(f) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2293(f)) is 
amended by striking ``14 days'' and inserting ``45 days''.

SEC. 3. TRANSITIONAL ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 250(d)(3)(B)(i) of the Trade Act of 1974 
(19 U.S.C. 2331(d)(3)(B)(i)) is amended by striking ``of such worker's 
initial unemployment compensation benefit period'' and inserting 
``after such worker's most recent qualifying separation''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to workers covered under a certification issued on 
or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        Consent of Independent Auditors



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-74515, 333-50841 and 333-50877) of Applied
Analytical Industries, Inc. of our report dated March 18, 1998 listed in the
accompanying index under Item 14 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial
Statement Schedule, which appears on page F-2 of this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 1999
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Steve Orlando Van Horne, * From the County Court at Law No. 2

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 2-199-22.

Vs. No. 11-23-00002-CR * September 12, 2024

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual Report of ValCom, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the  "Company"),  on  Form  10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Vince  Vellardita,  the  Company's  Chief Executive Officer (the
"Officer"),  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  Company's  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations.

                                          Dated:  March 14, 2005

                                          By:     /s/  Vince  Vellardita
                                                  ----------------------
                                                  Vince  Vellardita
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Willis, Bumgar dner and Senior Judge Overton Argued at Rich mond, Virginia

DENNIS HENLEY, S/K/A DENNIS HENLEY, A/ K/A DENNIS HINTON MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 0385-99-2 JU DGE RUDOLPH BU MGARDNER, III MAY 16, 2000 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND Robert W. Du ling, Judge Matthew P. Geary (G oodwin, Sutt on, Duval & Geary, on brief), for appellant. Marla Graff Decker , Assistant Attorney General (Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, recodifying Code § 17-116.010, this opinion is not designated for publication. The trial court convicted Dennis Henley of possession of cocaine upon a conditional plea of guilty. On appeal, he argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. He contends the seizure was illegal because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion that he was engaged in criminal activity or probable cause to search him. For the following reasons, we affirm. "In reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion to suppress, '[t]he burden is upon [the defendant] to show that th[e] ruling, when the evidence is considered in the light mostfavorable to the Commonwealth, constituted reversible error.'" McGee v. Commonwealth , 25 Va. App. 193, 197, 487 S.E.2d 259, 261 (1997) ( en banc ) (citation omitted). While we review de novo the ultimate questions of reasonable suspicion and probable cause, we "review findings of historical fact only for clear error and . . . give due weight to inferences drawn from those facts by resident judges and local law enforcement officers." Ornelas v. United States , 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996). Officer James Harrison and several other officers executed a search warrant for drugs at a residence. Harrison found the defendant in the dining area, searched him, and found cocaine on his person. Harrison testified that the warrant was an all persons warrant. Neither side introduced the warrant itself. When a search is conducted pursuant to a warrant, "the defendant must rebut the presumption of validity by proving that the warrant is illegal or invalid." Lebedun v. Commonwealth , 27 Va. App. 697, 711, 501 S.E.2d 427, 434 (1998). This Court has upheld the validity of warrants authorizing the search of all persons present in the named location. See Morton v. Commonwealth , 16 Va. App. 946, 951, 434 S.E.2d 890, 893 (1993). The defendant did not attack the validity of the warrant or the information upon which the magistrate found probable cause to issue the warrant to search all persons present. The uncontradicted evidence established that the search warrant authorized a search of all persons present at the residence.

- 2 -The defendant was present as the officers entered to execute the warrant, so the search of him was proper. The trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. Accordingly, we affirm the conviction. Affirmed.

- 3 -
<PAGE>




                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Marshall D. Sorokwasz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Impreso, Inc. as amended on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly
period ended May 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Impreso, Inc.

                                          By: /s/ Marshall D. Sorokwasz
                                             ----------------------------------
                                          Name: Marshall D. Sorokwasz
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer


I, Susan Atkins, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Impreso, Inc. as amended on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended
May 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form
10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Impreso, Inc.


                                          By: /s/ Susan Atkins
                                             -----------------------------------
                                          Name: Susan Atkins
                                          Title: Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### December 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 131920 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 131920 COA: 267672 Wayne CC: 00-011714-01 ALEXANDER L. FLIE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1218 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT 23
                                        
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                                        



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 2-96552 and 33-1112) pertaining to the AST Research, Inc.
Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase
Plan - 1983 (as amended); in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-1111
and 33-30666) pertaining to the Chief Executives' Plan (as amended); in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-29345,  33-57234 and 333-00485)
pertaining to the 1989 Long-Term Incentive Program (as amended); in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-52482 and 333-00489) pertaining to the
Non-Employee Directors' Common Stock Purchase Warrants and 1991 Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors; in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-
55241) pertaining to the AST Research, Inc. 1994 One-Time Grant Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors; and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-00487) pertaining to the President's Plan of AST Research, Inc. of our
report dated January 30, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial 
statements and schedule of AST Research, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 28, 1996.



 
                                                     Ernst & Young LLP


Orange County, California
March 28, 1997
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ,

Appellant,

v.

VICTOR VAZQUEZ,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00223

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law Number Seven

of El Paso, Texas

(TC # 2017

- DCV

- 0755)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record, and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified below for observance

.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER , 2020.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.