alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2015 

# Order

Clerk January 27, 2015

150446 ( 31 )

DE LLA DOTSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 1 50446

v COA: 3 15411

Macomb CC: 20 11

- 003427

- NI

GARFIELD COURT ASSOCIATES, LLC,

d/b/a GARFIELD COMMONS, and

BROOKLINE MANAGEMENT COMPANY

, Defendant s

- Appellant s

.

________________________________ _____ /

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of defendants

- appellants to extend the

time for filing the ir reply in support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED.

The reply submitted on January 16, 2015, is accepted for filing.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Rahim Rayani, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

         1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date:  July 13, 2006


                                        Rahim Rayani
                                        Chief Executive Officer and President
                                        Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of iPCS, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/   Timothy M. Yager                                                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy M. Yager, President and Chief Executive  Officer                             |
| May 10, 2007                                                                         |
|                                                                                 |
|                                                                                 |
| /s/   Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr.                                        |   |
| Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
| May 10, 2007                                                                         |

 

 

----
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 

DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 

Compensation of Non-Employee Directors 

For fiscal 2017, our non-employee directors were entitled to the following payments: 

 

	 	•	 	Annual retainer of $80,000 for each non-employee director 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $28,000 for the Audit Committee Chair 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $15,000 for each Audit Committee member (other than the Chair) 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $26,000 for the Chair of the subcommittee of the Audit Committee 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $23,000 for the Executive Compensation Committee Chair 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $10,000 for each Executive Compensation Committee member (other than the Chair) 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $18,000 for the Corporate Governance Committee Chair 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $8,000 for each Corporate Governance Committee member (other than the Chair) 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $18,000 for the Finance Committee Chair 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $8,000 for each Finance Committee member (other than the Chair) 

  

	 	•	 	Additional annual retainer of $70,000 for the Lead Director 

  

	 	•	 	Two annual deferred stock awards for each non-employee director, each representing shares of our common stock valued at $80,000 


Directors are reimbursed for customary expenses for attending Board and committee meetings. Members of the Executive Committee do not receive
committee-specific compensation. The deferred stock awards (and deferred dividends on those awards) are granted under our Stock Incentive Plan. One of the deferred stock awards vests immediately and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock at
the earlier of separation from service as a director or change of control. The second award vests based on a director’s continued service until the annual meeting next following the grant of the award (subject to possible earlier vesting in the
event of a change of control, if not continued or assumed in the transaction or if a qualifying termination of service as a director occurs prior to the scheduled vesting date), and is payable with accumulated dividends in stock upon vesting or, if
an irrevocable advance election is made, at the same time as the first award. In the event that a non-employee director separates from service as a director prior to vesting in the second award, that award
will be forfeited. 
 Compensation of Directors who are Employees of the Company 

Directors who are employees of TJX are not paid for their service as a director.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         24,175
<SECURITIES>                                   816,517
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,940
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    566,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,524,911
<PP&E>                                         141,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                 46,609
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,717,968
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,526
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,439,483
<COMMON>                                       224,690
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,726,086
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,717,968
<SALES>                                        869,829
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               869,829
<CGS>                                          441,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  441,886
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               945,906
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             12,876
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (467,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (467,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (467,207)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(on Forms S-8) pertaining to the Aspect Development, Inc. 1992 Amended and
Restated Stock Option Plan, 1996 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan, 1996
Employee Stock Purchase Plan; the 1997 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan, 1992
Stock Option and Options Granted Under the Cadis, Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan
and Assumed by Aspect Development, Inc., of our report dated January 26, 1998,
except with respect to paragraph 3 of Note 4, as to which the date is
August 15, 1998, and paragraph 4 of Note 4, as to which the date is March 10,
2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Aspect
Development, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 27, 2000
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1234 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the 

Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2011 

Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Act of June 18, 1934, to reaffirm the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to take land into 

trust for Indian tribes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY. 

4 (a) MODIFICATION.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

6 19 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known 

7 as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 479), 

8 is amended— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1234 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘The term’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘Effective beginning on June 18, 1934, the 

3 term’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘any recognized Indian 

5 tribe now under Federal jurisdiction’’ and in6 serting ‘‘any federally recognized Indian tribe’’. 

7 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

8 by paragraph (1) shall take effect as if included in 

9 the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the 

10 ‘‘Indian Reorganization Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 479), on 

11 the date of the enactment of that Act. 

12 (b) RATIFICATION AND CONFIRMATION OF AC13 TIONS.—Any action taken by the Secretary of the Interior 

14 pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known 

15 as the ‘‘Indian Reorganization Act’’; 25 U.S.C. 461 et 

16 seq.), for any Indian tribe that was federally recognized 

17 on that date of the action is ratified and confirmed, to 

18 the extent such action is subjected to challenge based on 

19 whether the Indian tribe was federally recognized or under 

20 Federal jurisdiction on June 18, 1934, ratified and con21 firmed as fully to all intents and purposes as if the action 

22 had, by prior Act of Congress, been specifically authorized 

23 and directed. 

24 (c) EFFECT ON OTHER LAWS.— 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1234 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Nothing in this section or 

2 the amendments made by this section shall affect— 

3 (A) the application or effect of any Federal 

4 law other than the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 

5 U.S.C. 461 et seq.), as amended by subsection 

6 (a) of this section; or 

7 (B) any limitation on the authority of the 

8 Secretary of the Interior under any Federal law 

9 or regulation other than the Act of June 18, 

10 1934 (25 U.S.C. 461 et seq.), as so amended. 

11 (2) REFERENCES IN OTHER LAWS.—An express 

12 reference to the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 

13 461 et seq.), contained in any other Federal law 

14 shall be considered to be a reference to that Act as 

15 amended by subsection (a) of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
BRIAN QUINN

Chief Justice

JAMES T. CAMPBELL

Justice

MACKEY K. HANCOCK

Justice

PATRICK A. PIRTLE

Justice 

# Court of Appeals

Seventh District of Texas

Potter County Courts Building

501 S. Fillmore, Suite 2

-

A

Amarillo, Texas 79101

- 2449

www.txcourts.gov/ 7thcoa.aspx VIVIAN LONG

Clerk

MAILING ADDRESS:

P. O. Box 9540

79105

- 9540

(806) 342

- 2650

May 27, 2015

Kristen Jernigan

Attorney at Law

207 S. Austin Ave.

Georgetown, TX 78626

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 07

- 15

- 00016

- CR

Trial Court Case Number: 12

- 05502

- CRF

- 361

Style: Lawrence Pena v. The State of Texas

Dear Counsel:

By Order of the Court, the motion for an extension of time to file Appellant’s brief

is this day granted. Appellant ’ s brief is filed as of May 21, 2015.

Very truly yours, 

# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

xc: Douglas Howell (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 124 

To provide that rates of pay for Members of Congress shall not be adjusted 

under section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 

in the year following any fiscal year in which outlays of the United 

States exceed receipts of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that rates of pay for Members of Congress shall 

not be adjusted under section 601(a)(2) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 in the year following 

any fiscal year in which outlays of the United States 

exceed receipts of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 124 IH

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE LEGISLATIVE REORGA2 NIZATION ACT OF 1946. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 601(a)(2) of the Legisla4 tive Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31(2)) is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) An adjustment in rates of pay may be made 

7 under this paragraph in a year only if the aggregate out8 lays of the United States during the last completed fiscal 

9 year did not exceed the aggregate receipts of the United 

10 States during such fiscal year, as determined by the Con11 gressional Budget Office.’’. 

12 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 601(a)(2)(A) 

13 of such Act is amended by striking ‘‘Subject to subpara14 graph (B),’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subparagraphs (B) 

15 and (C),’’. 

16 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

17 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

18 respect to any adjustment which, but for this Act, would 

19 otherwise become effective on or after January 1, 2013. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21

                         THERMO BIOANALYSIS CORPORATION

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

      As of February 20, 1998, the Registrant owned the following
   subsidiaries:


                                                       STATE OR      PERCENT
                                                    JURISDICTION OF     OF
                         NAME                        INCORPORATION  OWNERSHIP

        Denley Instruments Inc.                    North Carolina      100

        Fastighets AB Skrubba                      Sweden              100
        Dynatech Laboratories spol. s.r.o.         Czech Republic      100
        DYNEX Technologies (Asia) Inc.             Delaware            100
        DYNEX Technologies Inc.                    Virginia            100
        Hybaid BV                                  Netherlands         100
        Hybaid Limited                             England             100
        Labsystems Espana SA                       Spain               100
        Labsystems Inc.                            Delaware            100
        Labsystems Japan K.K.                      Japan               100
        Labsystems OY                              Finland             100
           Labsystems (Hong Kong) Limited          Hong Kong            99
           Labsystems BTD                          China                33
           Labsystems LHD                          China                33
           Labsystems Lenpipette                   Russia               95
        Labsystems Pakistan (Private) Ltd          Pakistan             34
        Labsystems Sweden AB                       Sweden              100
        Labsystems (UK) Limited                    England             100
        Life Sciences International(Benelux) B.V.  Netherlands         100
        Thermo BioAnalysis GmbH                    Germany             100
           DYNEX Technologies GmbH                 Germany             100
           Thermo LabSystems Vertriebs GmbH        Germany             100
        Thermo BioAnalysis (Guernsey) Ltd.         Channel Islands     100
        Thermo BioAnalysis Holding, Limited        United Kingdom      100
           Affinity Sensors Limited                United Kingdom      100

           Dynex Technologies Limited              United Kingdom      100
           Thermo BioAnalysis Limited              United Kingdom      100
           Thermo LabSystems Limited               United Kingdom      100
        Thermo BioAnalysis S.A.                    France              100
           Thermo LabSystems S.A.R.L.              France              100
        Thermo LabSystem (Australia) Pty Limited   Australia           100
        Thermo LabSystems Inc.                     Massachusetts       100
#### Isaac KING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29780.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 7, 1958.

J. P. Hart, J. Hudson Moyer, La Grange, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for assault with intent to murder with mialice; the punishment, 5 years.

The sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is challenged.

The testimony of the state shows that Deputy Sheriff Nagel went to appellant’s one room rural home to investigate a complaint that appellant had made some unwanted visits to a married man’s home in the community. He had no warrant of arrest for appellant and did not go to arrest him but to talk with him and warn him to stay away from the neighbor’s home. Appellant was in his house when Officer Na-gel arrived; refused to admit him, and also refused to leave the house; talked as if he “didn’t have the right sense” or was “cracking up,” indirectly threatened the neighbor and laughed. Officer Nagel then left and radioed his office for assistance. Three deputy sheriffs soon arrived without a warrant and the four drove to appellant’s place and stopped about 25 yards from his house. At this time appellant came out of the house with a rifle, and the officers called to him to drop the rifle and come to them, that they wanted to talk with him. Appellant then turned and ran around his house, and the officers, two on each side of the house, ran toward him. When appellant got around the house he turned as he ran and shot his rifle and the officers heard the bullet “whistle” by them', then appellant ran toward a pasture and appeared to be reloading the rifle as he ran. When he was about 70 yards away, one of the officers shot him in the back with a shot gun loaded with buckshot, striking him from the hips down, and when they caught him after a chase of about 75 yards he was trying to reload the rifle.

Appellant did not testify and called only one witness who testified in support of his application for suspended sentence.

From a careful consideration of these facts, we are unable to reach the conclusion *678that they are sufficient to show appellant guilty of the offense of assault with intent to murder with malice.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved hy the Court.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Syms Corp  Secaucus, New Jersey 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 2-9703, 333-44254 and 333-127399) of Syms    Corp of our reports dated April 25, 2008, relating to the financial    statements and the effectiveness of Syms Corp internal control over financial    reporting which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also    consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 25, 2008    relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form10-K. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

 

BDO Seidman, LLPNew York, New York April 25, 2008 

----
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 595

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located in the State

of West Virginia.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 22 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 1995

Mr. BYRD (for himself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located

in the State of West Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 7307, the

8 Commission shall, upon the request of the licensee for the

9 project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence,

10 and public interest requirements of that section and the
2

•S 595 IS

1 Commission’s procedures under that section, extend the

2 time period during which the licensee is required to com3 mence construction of the project so as to terminate on

4 September 26, 1999.

5 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

6 for the project described in subsection (a) upon the expira7 tion of the extension, issued by the Commission under sec8 tion 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the

9 period required for commencement of construction of the

10 project.

11 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If a li12 cense for the project described in subsection (a) has ex13 pired prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Com14 mission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date

15 of its expiration and extend the time required for com16 mencement of construction of the project until September

17 26, 1999.

Æ