alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**As adopted pursuant to**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Park Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2009 (the“Report”), the undersigned, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 

March 31, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 595 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 141

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 595

                          [Report No. 104-108]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located in the 
                        State of West Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                July 11 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

                       Reported without amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 141
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 595

                          [Report No. 104-108]

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located in the 
                        State of West Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 22 (legislative day, March 16), 1995

  Mr. Byrd (for himself and Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                July 11 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located in the 
                        State of West Virginia.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 7307, the Commission shall, upon the request of the licensee 
for the project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and 
public interest requirements of that section and the Commission's 
procedures under that section, extend the time period during which the 
licensee is required to commence construction of the project so as to 
terminate on September 26, 1999.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall take effect for the 
project described in subsection (a) upon the expiration of the 
extension, issued by the Commission under section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the period required for commencement of 
construction of the project.
    (c) Reinstatement of expired license.--If a license for the project 
described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of 
the date of its expiration and extend the time required for 
commencement of construction of the project until September 26, 1999.
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 527

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel EMPRESS.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

EMPRESS.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the
2

S 527 IS

1 coastwise trade for the vessel EMPRESS, (United States

2 official number 975018).

Æ
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 123 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain tax relief 

permanent, and to repeal the estate tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. GINGREY of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

certain tax relief permanent, and to repeal the estate tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EGTRRA AND JGTRRA TAX RELIEF MADE PER4 MANENT. 

5 (a) ECONOMIC GROWTH AND TAX RELIEF REC6 ONCILIATION ACT OF 2001.—Title IX of the Economic 

7 Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 is here8 by repealed. 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 123 IH

1 (b) INCOME TAX RATES ON DIVIDENDS AND NET

2 CAPITAL GAIN.—Section 303 of the Jobs and Growth Tax 

3 Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 is hereby repealed. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

5 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

6 of this Act. 

7 SEC. 2. REINSTATEMENT OF ESTATE TAX REPEAL. 

8 Effective December 31, 2009, title III of the Tax Re9 lief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job 

10 Creation Act of 2010 is repealed and the Internal Revenue 

11 Code of 1986 shall be applied and administered to estates 

12 of decedents dying, gifts made, or generation skipping 

13 transfers as if the provisions of, and amendments made 

14 by, such title had never been enacted. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8689-8690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Cancer Technologies for Global Health.
    Date: February 13, 2024.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Cancer Institute at Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 7W238, Rockville, Maryland 20850 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jeffrey E. DeClue, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Research Technology and Contract Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Room 7W238, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 240-276-6371, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c4a0a1a7a8b1a1ae84a9a5ada8eaaaadaceaa3abb2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0e6a6b6d627b6b644e636f67622060676620696178">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 8690]]


    Dated: February 5, 2024.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-02593 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                               302 CERTIFICATIONS

                         I, Marc D. Olin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Printcafe Software, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's financial reporting
that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: August 14, 2003

                                     /s/ Marc D. Olin
                                     -------------------------
                                     MARC D. OLIN
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       27
!4910-13-Pj

DEPAIHMENT OF TRANSPORTAnON

Federa! Aviatjon Administration

14CFR P3rt39

IDocket No. FAA-2010-0222; Directorate Iden,tifier 20OS·NM-012-AD; Am~ndme

11;'2!.l i!#-iD

39- ,f\D 2010-~1

RIN 2120·.4 ....,..64

Aimonhine.ss Directives; BAE SYSTEMS (Operations) limlled Model Avro 146-R

and BAe 1% Airplanes I

AGENCY: Fede;ml Avi:!tion AdminiSlration (FlA), Dcpanmcnt ofT ranspon:ttion

(!JOT).

7T-//t;

:;g;;z;v

"'21J.,f~

o

The uns;rfe condition could result in loss ora \Vi]g or controllability afthe alrplane. We

FAA Form 1~60.' 4.1 (6.S9) O;FrClALFILECOpy <>v.sGQ".'L••-e....,. •..,••.•1N1lO""c. ,-
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT July Term 2014

ALLOY LEWIN
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 1975

[ August 13, 2014 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael I. Rothschild

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 00

- 5384CF10A

.

Bernard F. Daley of The Daley Law Firm, Tallahassee, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

We affirm the trial court order summarily denying appellant’s third motion for post

- conviction relief and/or habeas corpus petition. This motion was unsworn, untimely, successive and patently without merit. Appellant filed two prior motions for post

- conv iction relief, the summary

denial of which this court affirmed per curiam in Lewin v. State , 881 So. 2d 1124 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2004)

, and Lewin v. State , 901 So. 2d 138 (Fla.

4 th DCA 2005).

Accordingly, we caution appellant that the filing of any future

successive and frivolous pro se motions, petitions or appeals attacking his convictions and sentences in this case may result in sanctions, such

as a ban on future pro se filings in this court and/or referral to prison officials for disciplinary procedures. See State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999). See also § 944. 279(1), Fla. Stat.; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(n).

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN
, C.J., L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22

-0594

_________________
IN THE MATTER OF: A.G. and A.G., Youths in Need of Care. O R D E R

_________________ On January 23, 2023, and pursuant to motion of counsel for Appellant Mother T.M.B., this Court granted leave to supplement the record and to stay briefing pending supplementation, with Mother having 30 days from the filing ofthe supplemented record in which to prepare, file, and serve her opening brief. Appellant Mother was advised that no further extensions of time would be granted. This Court received the supplementation to the record on March 6, 2023,but Mother has failed to timely file her opening brief. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than May 8, 2023
. No further extensions will be granted. Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 17 2023

04/17/2023
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131137 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131137 

 COA: 265493 

Muskegon CC: 01-046631-FC

DALE ALLEN GENO,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 11, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1120 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2006 

 Clerk
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 4438Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 2 of 26 PageID #: 4439Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 3 of 26 PageID #: 4440Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 4 of 26 PageID #: 4441Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 5 of 26 PageID #: 4442Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 6 of 26 PageID #: 4443Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 7 of 26 PageID #: 4444Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 8 of 26 PageID #: 4445Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 9 of 26 PageID #: 4446Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 10 of 26 PageID #: 4447Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 11 of 26 PageID #: 4448Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 12 of 26 PageID #: 4449Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 13 of 26 PageID #: 4450Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 14 of 26 PageID #: 4451Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 15 of 26 PageID #: 4452Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 16 of 26 PageID #: 4453Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 17 of 26 PageID #: 4454Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 18 of 26 PageID #: 4455Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 19 of 26 PageID #: 4456Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 20 of 26 PageID #: 4457Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 21 of 26 PageID #: 4458Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 22 of 26 PageID #: 4459

### s/ Richard G. Kopf 22nd Decembe r Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 23 of 26 PageID #: 4460Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 24 of 26 PageID #: 4461Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 25 of 26 PageID #: 4462Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 26 of 26 PageID #: 4463
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

DONALD SHIREY,

Petitioner

v.

THE BON TON STORES, INC. (WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 119 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of December, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
#### Prosper Adam DWORACZYK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 34411.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 7, 1962.

*938Hal: J; -Putman and James V. Mondin, San Antonio, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

Officer Archie Williams testified that on the night in question he observed the appellant driving his automobile upon W. W. White Road in the City of San Antonio and after pursuing him for several blocks stopped him for speeding. The officer testified that when he went to the automobile, appellant appeared to be intoxicated and after he observed that appellant’s eyes were watery, his speech was slurred and that he had difficulty in walking, he took appellant to the police station and booked him for Driving While Intoxicated. Officer Williams further testified that in his opinion appellant was at such time intoxicated.

As a witness in his own behalf, appellant admitted having had a few beers prior to his arrest but stated that he thought he was sober. Witnesses were called by appellant who testified that they had observed appellant during the afternoon and expressed their opinions that at such time he was sober.

The jury resolved the disputed issue of intoxication against appellant and we find the evidence sufficient to sustain their verdict.

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the court erred in refusing to permit him to ask each prospective juror on voir dire examination of the jury panel the following question: “At present do you engage in any form of athletics, particularly bowling ?”

While an accused is allowed great latitude in his voir dire examination of prospective jurors to determine whether a peremptory challenge will be used, there is nothing in the record which shows that the question sought to be propounded to . the jurors relative to their participation in athletics had any relevancy to the inquiry; hence no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court is shown.

Furthermore, the record does not show what the answers of the prospective jurors would have been or that any juror served on the jury who was objectionable to appellant. In the absence of such a showing no reversible error could be predicated upon the court’s ruling. Yelton v. State, 75 Tex.Cr.R. 38, 170 S.W. 318; Williams v. State, *939147 Tex.Cr.R. 178, 179 S.W.2d 297 and Lehman v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 354 S.W.2d 586.

Finding the evidence sufficient to support the conviction and no reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We hereby  consent  to the use of our  report,  which  contains  an  explanatory
paragraph with respect to the substantial  doubt about the Company's  ability to
continue  as  a  going  concern,   dated  October  10,  1998   accompanying  the
consolidated  financial  statements  of  HealthWatch,  Inc. as of June 30, 1999,
included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and to the  incorporation
by reference of the  aforementioned  financial  statements  in the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 for the 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan,  Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of  1987,Stock  Option Plan of 1989 and Stock Option Plan of 1993,
Registration   Statement  nos.  33-36833,   33-22729,   33-36832  and  33-75470,
respectively, Registration Statements on Form S-8 for the 1995 Stock Option Plan
and 1995 Stock  Grant and  Salary  Deferral  Plan  Registration  Statement  nos.
033-65151 and 333-35297 and S-3 Registration Statements for Selling Shareholders
nos. 33-88032, 333-19393, 333-21929 and 333-26913.

/s/ Tauber & Balser, P.C.

TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Atlanta, Georgia

October 13, 1999