### 61095 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Notices

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5066. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4584–000. Applicants: Burgess Capital LLC. Description: Burgess Capital LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1: Baseline 714 compliance to be effective 9/21/
2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5068. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4585–000. Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.

Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35: NYISO filing of tariff revisions per NYISO PJM settlement agreement to be effective 9/16/2010.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5084. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4586–000. Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.

Description: Florida Power & Light Company submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: FPL and FMPA Third Revised Service Agreement No. 80 to be effective 10/1/2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5096. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4587–000. Applicants: Glenwood Energy Partners, Ltd.

Description: Glenwood Energy Partners, Ltd. submits tariff filing per 35.1: Glenwood FERC Rate Schedule No. 1 Baseline to be effective 9/21/2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5097. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4588–000. Applicants: LoneStar Energy Partners LLC.

Description: LoneStar Energy Partners LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1: Lonestar FERC Rate Schedule No. 1 Baseline to be effective 9/21/2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5098. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4589–000. Applicants: EcoGrove Wind, LLC. Description: EcoGrove Wind, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1: EcoGrove Wind LLC Baseline Tariff Filing to be effective 9/21/2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5100. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4590–000. Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc. Description: Westar Energy, Inc. submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: Revisions to Schedule 3A, Balancing Area Services Agreement to be effective 12/1/2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5101. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4591–000. Applicants: Red Hills Wind Project, LLC.

Description: Red Hills Wind Project, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1: Red Hills Wind Project, LLC Baseline Tariff to be effective 9/21/2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5102. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4592–000. Applicants: Tatanka Wind Power, LLC.

Description: Tatanka Wind Power, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1: Tatanka Wind Power, LLC Baseline Tariff Filing to be effective 9/21/2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5103. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4593–000. Applicants: Nevada Solar One, LLC. Description: Nevada Solar One, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1: Nevada Solar One, LLC Baseline Tariff Filing to be effective 9/21/2011.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5104. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ER11–4594–000. Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.

Description: Notice of Termination of Service Agreement No. 121 of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5133. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Take notice that the Commission received the following electric securities filings:

Docket Numbers: ES11–48–000. Applicants: Kentucky Utilities Company.

Description: Kentucky Utilities Company submits its Application under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5131. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

Docket Numbers: ES11–49–000. Applicants: Louisville Gas & Electric Company.

Description: Louisville Gas and Electric Company’s Application under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act.

Filed Date: 09/21/2011. Accession Number: 20110921–5132. Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, October 12, 2011.

The filings are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number.

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf . For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.

Dated: September 22, 2011. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011–25334 Filed 9–30–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6717–01–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9474–5]**

**California State Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Standards; Within**  **the Scope Determination and Waiver of Preemption Decision for Amendments**  **to California’s Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Standards** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of Decision.

**SUMMARY :**  By this decision the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that provisions of the California Air Resources Board’s (CARB’s) 2008 amendments to the California Zero-Emission Vehicle (ZEV) regulations as they affect 2011 and prior model years (MYs) are within the scope of previous waivers of preemption granted to California for its ZEV regulations. In the alternative, EPA is


### 61096 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Notices

1 58 FR 4166.

2 66 FR 7751.

3 71 FR 78190 (December 28, 2006). 4 EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0780–0001.

5 CARB’s 2008 ZEV Amendments were adopted by Executive Order R–08–015 on December 17, 2008, and were approved by the California Office of Administrative Law on March 18, 2009.

6 75 FR 11878 (March 12, 2010).

7 EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0780–0003 and EPA–HQ– OAR–2009–0780–0004, respectively.

8 CARB’s 2008 ZEV amendments were adopted by Executive Order R–08–015 on December 17, 2008 and approved by the California Office of Administrative Law on March 18, 2009. The 2008 ZEV amendments place the ZEV requirements in two sections of title 13 of the California Code of Regulations—sections 1962 and 1962.1. also granting a waiver of preemption for the 2008 ZEV amendments at they affect 2011 and prior MYs. EPA is also granting California’s request for a waiver of preemption to enforce the 2008 ZEV amendments as they affect 2012 and later MYs.

**DATES :**  Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, judicial review of this final action may be sought only in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Petitions for review must be filed December 2, 2011. Under section 307(b)(2) of the Act, judicial review of this final action may not be obtained in subsequent enforcement proceedings.

**ADDRESSES :**  The Agency’s Decision Document, containing an explanation of this decision, as well as all documents relied upon in making that decision, including those submitted to EPA by CARB, are available at EPA’s Air and Radiation Docket (Air Docket). Materials relevant to this decision are contained in Docket No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2009– 0780. The docket is located in the EPA Headquarters Library, EPA West Building, Room 3334, located at 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, and may be viewed between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. The telephone is (202) 566–1742. A reasonable fee may be charged by EPA for copying docket material.

Additionally, an electronic version of the public docket is available through the Federal government’s electronic public docket and comment system. You may access EPA dockets at http:// www.regulations.gov. After opening the http://www.regulations.gov web site, select ‘‘Environmental Protection Agency’’ from the pull-down Agency list, then scroll to ‘‘Keyword or ID’’ and enter EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0780 to view documents in the record of this California request. Although a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ) maintains a Web page that contains today’s decision along with the Decision Document; this page is accessible at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/cawaiver.htm. OTAQ also maintains a Web page that contains general information on its review of California waiver requests. Included on that page are links to prior waiver decisions and can be accessed at http://www.epa.gove/ otaq/cafr.htm.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  David Dickinson, Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel Rios Building (6405J), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Telephone: (202) 343–9256. E-Mail Address: Dickinson.David@EPA.GOV

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Chronology

California’s initial ZEV program was included as part of its first low-emission vehicle program known as LEV I. The ZEV component of this program had a ZEV sales requirement that phased-in starting with the 1998 MY with a 10 percent sales requirement by the 2003 MY. EPA issued a waiver of preemption for these regulations on January 13,
1993. 1 CARB subsequently amended its ZEV regulations in March, 1996, by eliminating the ZEV sales requirement for the 1998–2002 MYs and retaining the 10 percent sales requirement for the 2003 and later MYs. EPA issued a within-the-scope determination for these amendments on January 25, 2001. 2

On December 21, 2006, EPA waived preemption for CARB’s 1999, 2001, and 2003 ZEV rulemaking amendments through the 2011 MY. 3 EPA determined that certain provisions of the 1999–2003 amendments to the ZEV regulations as they affect 2006 and prior MYs were within-the-scope of previous waivers of preemption granted to California for its ZEV regulations pursuant to section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act (the Act). EPA also granted California’s request for a waiver of preemption to enforce certain provisions of the ZEV regulations as they affected 2007 through 2011 MY vehicles. EPA also stated that that although we believed it appropriate to grant a full waiver of preemption for the 2007 MY, we also believed it appropriate to consider the 2007 MY regulations (with one exception noted) as within the scope of previous waivers of preemption, as they applied to certain vehicles that were already subject to the pre-existing ZEV regulations. In its December 21, 2006 decision EPA did not making any findings or determinations with regard to CARB’s ZEV regulations as they pertained to the 2012 and later MYs.

On September 17, 2009 CARB submitted a request to EPA (Waiver Request) seeking confirmation that amendments to its ZEV regulations adopted in 2008 (2008 ZEV amendments) as they relate to the 2011 and earlier MYs are within the scope of EPA’s prior ZEV waivers. 4 In addition, CARB sought confirmation that its 2008 ZEV amendments as they relate to 2012 and later MYs are within the scope of EPA’s prior ZEV waivers or, in the alternative, meet the criteria for a full waiver of preemption. 5 EPA issued a Federal Register notice that announced a tentative hearing (a hearing only if one was requested by a commenter; in this case no hearing was requested or held) and opportunity for public comment and held the written comment period open until May 17, 2010. 6 EPA received a comment written jointly by the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers (Manufacturers’ Comments) and subsequent comment from CARB (CARB’s Supplemental Comments). 7

II. CARB’s Zero-Emission Vehicle Amendments

The 2008 ZEV amendments maintain the ZEV obligation or percentage ZEV requirements, but give manufacturers increased flexibility to comply with the ZEV requirements by giving credit to plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV), and establishing additional ZEV categories in recognition of new developments in fuel cell vehicles (FCV) and battery electric vehicles (BEV). As discussed below, a large-volume manufacturer is no longer expected to produce fuel-cell vehicles to meet part of its gold vehicle credit requirements for 2012 and later MYs. The 2008 ZEV amendments maintain the current options for large volume manufacturers to select either the Primary Compliance Path or the Alternative Compliance Path through MY 2011. For MYs 2012 through 2017, the 2008 ZEV amendments establish a ‘‘New Path,’’ a single compliance strategy or set of requirements that all large volume manufacturers are required to follow. CARB’s requirements for the 2018 and later MYs were not amended by the 2008 ZEV amendments apart from allowing additional flexibility in the technologies that meet the ZEV requirements. 8


### 61097 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Notices

9 California is the only State which meets section 209(b)(1) eligibility criteria for obtaining waivers. See e.g., S. Rep. No. 90–403, at 632 (1967).

10 See, e.g., 43 FR 32,182 (July 25, 1978).

11 See Motor and Equip. Mfr. Assoc., Inc. v. EPA, 627 F.2d 1095, 1111–14 (DC Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 952 (1980); 43 FR 25,729 (Jun. 14, 1978). To be consistent, the California procedures need not be identical to the Federal procedures. California procedures would be inconsistent, however, if manufacturers would be unable to meet both the state and the Federal requirements with the same vehicle. See, e.g., 43 FR 36679–680 (Aug. 18, 1978).

12 Decision Documents accompanying within the scope of waiver determination in 66 FR 7751 (January 25, 2001) at p. 5, and 51 FR 12391 (April 10, 1986) at p. 2; see also, e.g., 46 FR 36742 (July 15, 1981). III. Clean Air Act Waivers of Preemption and Within the Scope Decisions

Section 209(a) of the Act provides: No State or any political subdivision thereof shall adopt or attempt to enforce any standard relating to the control of emissions from new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines subject to this part. No State shall require certification, inspection or any other approval relating to the control of emissions from any new motor vehicle or new motor vehicle engine as condition precedent to the initial retail sale, titling (if any), or registration of such motor vehicle, motor vehicle engine, or equipment.

Section 209(b)(1) of the Act requires the Administrator, after an opportunity for public hearing, to waive application of the prohibitions of section 209(a) for any State that has adopted standards (other than crankcase emission standards) for the control of emissions from new motor vehicles or new motor engines prior to March 30, 1966, 9 if the State determines that standards will be, in the aggregate, at least as protective of public health and welfare as applicable Federal standards. The Administrator must grant a waiver unless she finds that: (A) The protectiveness determination of the State is arbitrary and capricious; (B) the State does not need the State standards to meet compelling and extraordinary conditions; or (C) the State standards and accompanying enforcement procedures are not consistent with section 202(a) of the Act.

Previous waiver decisions have stated that State standards are inconsistent with section 202(a) if there is inadequate lead time to permit the development of the necessary technology, given the cost of compliance within that time, or if the Federal and State test procedures impose inconsistent certification requirements. 10

With regard to enforcement procedures accompanying standards, the Administrator must grant the waiver unless she finds that these procedures may cause the California standards, in the aggregate, to be less protective of public health and welfare than the applicable Federal standards promulgated pursuant to section 202(a), or unless the Federal and California certification and test procedures are inconsistent. 11 Once California has received a waiver for its standards and enforcement procedures for a certain group or class of vehicles, it may adopt other conditions precedent to the initial retail sale, titling or registration of these vehicles without the necessity of receiving an additional waiver.

If California acts to amend a previously waived standard or accompanying enforcement procedure, the amendment may be considered within the scope of a previously granted waiver provided that it does not undermine California’s determination that its standards, in the aggregate, are as protective of public health and welfare as applicable Federal standards, does not affect its consistency with section 202(a) of the Act, and raises no new issues affecting EPA’s previous waiver decisions. 12 IV. Analysis

As explained in the Agency’s Decision Document EPA examined CARB’s 2008 ZEV amendments, as they affect 2011 and earlier MYs, under the within the scope criteria. EPA in the alternative also applied the full waiver criteria to the 2011 and earlier MYs. Although CARB requested that EPA confirm that the 2008 ZEV amendments, as they affect 2012 and later MYs, are within the scope of previous waivers of preemption, EPA instead applied the full waiver criteria to the regulations affecting those MYs.
A. California’s Protectiveness Determination

In its Waiver Request to EPA, CARB stated that the amendments to its ZEV requirements will not cause the California standards, in the aggregate, to be less protective of public health and welfare than the applicable Federal standards nor undermine CARB’s previous protectiveness determination. Because EPA has not received adverse public comment challenging CARB’s protectiveness determination, I cannot find that CARB was arbitrary and capricious in its protectiveness determination and cannot deny the within the scope determination nor the waiver based on this criterion. B. California’s Need for State Standards To Meet Compelling and Extraordinary Conditions

CARB also demonstrated continuing existence of compelling and extraordinary conditions, justifying the state’s need for its own motor vehicle pollution control program. Because EPA has not received adverse public comment challenging the need for CARB’s own motor vehicle pollution control program, I cannot deny the waiver based on a lack of compelling and extraordinary conditions. C. Consistency With Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act

CARB stated in its Waiver Request that the 2008 ZEV amendments provide manufacturers with additional compliance options and do not raise any concerns with regard to the technological feasibility of its regulations when giving due consideration to lead time and costs. In addition, CARB notes that the 2008 ZEV amendments do not create an issue of test procedure inconsistency.

The Manufacturers’ suggested that the 2008 ZEV amendments were not consistent with section 202(a). However, as explained in EPA’s Decision Document, EPA finds that the manufacturer groups opposing the within the scope confirmation and the waiver of preemption have not met their burden of proof that the 2008 ZEV amendments are inconsistent with section 202(a) of the Act. I cannot find that CARB’s ZEV regulations, as noted, would cause the California motor vehicle emission standards to be inconsistent with section 202(a).

D. New Issues

As explained in the Decision Document, EPA finds that the 2008 ZEV amendments raise no new issues for 2011 and earlier MYs.

E. Decision

Therefore, I confirm that CARB’s 2008 ZEV amendments as they affect the 2011 and earlier MYs, as noted above, are within the scope of existing waivers of preemption. I also find that the 2008 ZEV amendments as they affect the 2011 and earlier MYs meet the criteria for a full waiver and thus I alternatively grant a waiver of preemption for the regulations as they affect these MYs. I also grant a waiver of preemption of CARB’s 2008 ZEV amendments as they affect 2012 and later MYs. A full explanation of EPA’s decision, including our review of comments received in opposition to CARB’s request, is contained in a Decision


### 61098 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2011 / Notices

Document which may be obtained as explained above. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

My decision will affect not only persons in California but also the manufacturers outside the State who must comply with California’s requirements in order to produce new motor vehicles for sale in California. For this reason, I hereby determine and find that this is a final action of national applicability.

This action is not a rule as defined by Executive Order 12866. Therefore, it is exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget as required for rules and regulations by Executive Order 12866.

In addition, this action is not a rule as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601(2). Therefore, EPA has not prepared a supporting regulatory flexibility analysis addressing the impact of this action on small business entities.

Further, the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, does not apply because this action is not a rule for purposes of 5 U.S.C. 804(3).

Finally, the Administrator has delegated the authority to make determinations regarding waivers under § 209(b) of the Act to the Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.

Dated: September 26, 2011. Gina McCarthy, Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2011–25399 Filed 9–30–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9474–2]**

**Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition; Release of Final Report** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of Availability.

**SUMMARY :**  On September 30, 2011, the EPA publically released the final report entitled Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition. The document was prepared by the National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA) within EPA’s Office of Research and Development. The Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition provides information on various physiological and behavioral factors commonly used in assessing exposure to environmental chemicals. The handbook was first published in 1989 and was updated in 1997. This edition incorporates information made available from 1997 up until July 2011. It also reflects the revisions made to the Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook, which was last updated and published in 2008. Each chapter in the Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition presents recommended values for the exposure factors covered in that particular chapter’s exposure route as well as a discussion of the underlying data used in developing the recommendations.

The Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition (EPA/600/R–09/052F) is available via the Internet at http:// www.epa.gov/ncea.

**DATES :**  This report was posted publically on September 30, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  The report is available primarily via the Internet on the National Center for Environmental Assessment’s home page under the Recent Additions and Publications
menus at http://www.epa.gov/ncea. Paper copies of the report are not available. A limited number of CD– ROMs will be available from the Information Management Team, NCEA; telephone: 703–347–8561; facsimile: 703–347–8691. If you are requesting a CD–ROM, please provide your name, your mailing address, and the document title.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For additional information, contact the National Center for Environmental Assessment; Jacqueline Moya; telephone: 703–347–8539; or e-mail: moya.jacqueline@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. Information About the Project/ Document

The Exposure Factors Handbook: 2011 Edition provides a summary of the available statistical data on various factors used in assessing human exposure. These factors include: drinking water consumption; mouthing behavior; soil ingestion rates; inhalation rates; dermal factors, including skin area and soil adherence factors; consumption of fruits and vegetables, fish, meats, dairy products, and homegrown foods; human milk intake; human activity factors; consumer product use; and building characteristics. This handbook is intended for use by exposure assessors, within the Agency as well as those outside, as a reference tool and primary source of exposure factor information. It may be used by scientists, economists, and other interested parties as a source of data and/or U.S. EPA recommendations on numeric estimates for behavioral and physiological characteristics needed to estimate exposure to environmental agents. Recommended values are available for the general population and, for most of the exposure factors, are also available by age, sex, as well as for other populations that may have characteristics different from the general population.

Dated: September 23, 2011. Darrell A. Winner, Acting Director, National Center for Environmental Assessment.
[FR Doc. 2011–25412 Filed 9–30–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–1059; FRL–9471–8]**

**Guidance for 1-Hour SO**2 **NAAQS SIP Submissions** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of availability and public comment period.

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given that the EPA has posted its draft non-binding guidance titled, ‘‘Guidance for 1–Hour SO2 NAAQS SIP Submissions’’ on its Web site. The EPA invites public comments on this guidance document during the comment period specified below, and plans to issue an updated version of the guidance after reviewing timely submitted comments.

**DATES :**  Comments should be submitted on or before November 2, 2011. Please refer to **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** for additional information on the comment period.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2010–1059, by one of the following methods:

• http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

• E-mail: a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– OAR–2010–1059.

• Fax: 202–566–9744. Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–
1059.

• Mail: Air Docket, Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–1059, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.

• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 3334, Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket