alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22388-22389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9684]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, May 11, 2011; 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee 37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia J. Halsey, Federal 
Coordinator, Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 
2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-
2347 or e-mail: halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations

[[Page 22389]]

to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of environmental 
restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main meeting presentation will be on 
Groundwater Contamination Management Strategies at the Oak Ridge 
Reservation.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Patricia J. Halsey at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Patricia J. Halsey at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests must be received five days 
prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include 
the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer 
is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Patricia 
J. Halsey at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will 
also be available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on April 18, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-9684 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Public Media Works, Inc. (the
Company), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: October 18, 2007                              
|                                                     
|/s/ Corbin Bernsen                                   
|Corbin Bernsen                                       
|Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
|                                                     
|/s/ Mark Smith                                       
|Mark Smith                                           

Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Howard ROSS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 35230.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 16, 1963.

W. D. Hollars, Plainview, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for procuring; the punishment, two months in jail and a fine ■ of $75.

It'appears from the record that this case was filed in the County Court of Hale County, and that the trial on the merits was had before Judge C. L. Abernethy the regular judge of the County Court of Hale County.

The record further shows that the motion for a new trial in this case was heard by Frank R. Day, Special County Judge of Hale County; that he heard the evidence submitted thereon and refused the motion to which action of. the Special Judge, the appellant in open court excepted and gave notice of appeal.

The record fails to show the mode of the selection as prescribed by statute of the special judge that heard and refused the motion for a new trial, and before whom notice of appeal was given and recognizance entered. It also fails to show that he took the oath of office as required by Art. 555, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. 33 Tex.Jur.2d 460, Sec. 85; 1 Branch 2d 320, Sec. 278; Baker v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 130, 261 S.W. 2d 593; Parish v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 268 S.W.2d 149; West v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 358 S.W.2d 132

For the reasons pointed out the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.
#### Johnny PEDROSO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 36923.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 3, 1964.

Rehearing Denied June 24, 1964.

John Shirley, Roland Matthews, Texas City, for appellant.

Jules Damiani, Jr., Dist. Atty., Ralph J. Bernsen, Sr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Galveston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault by an adult male upon a female; the punishment, a fine of $50.00.

The variance between the allegations of the complaint and the information is shown by supplemental transcript to have been a clerical error in the preparation of the transcript. Our original opinion is withdrawn.

Trial was before the court and the evidence is before us in narrative form.

We need not pass upon the serious question of the sufficiency of the evidence to show that the prosecutrix was injured or that the incident caused her a sense of shame, constraint or some disagreeable-emotion of the mind because we are unable to find in the statement of facts any evidence to sustain the allegation of the complaint and information that the appellant was an adult male.

Without such proof, the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. 4 Branch’s Ann.P.C.2d, Sec. 1736.

The State’s motion for rehearing is overruled and the judgment is reversed.
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of InMedica
Development Corporation (the Company) that the Annual Report of the Company on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such periods and
the results of operations of the Company for such periods.








/s/ Ralph
Henson


Ralph
Henson,


Chief
Executive Officer


DATE:  March
26, 2008











/s/ Richard
Bruggeman


Richard
Bruggeman,


Chief
Financial Officer


DATE:   March
26, 2008
BEFORE THE

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON D.C.

_____________________________________

)

2012 CHICAGO - CANCUN ) Docket DOT-OST-2012-0001

COMBINATION SERVICE PROCEEDING )

_____________________________________ )

_____________________________________

)

Applications of )

) 

 AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC. ) Docket DOT-OST-2011-0225

 )

 FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. ) Docket DOT-OST-2011-0214

)

For an exemption pursuant to )

49 U.S.C. § 40109 ) 

_____________________________________ )

ERRATUM TO REPLY OF AIRTRAN AIRWAYS, INC.

The Reply filed by AirTran Airways in this proceeding on February 1, 2012 

contained the following inadvertent errors that AirTran wishes to bring to the 

attention of the Department and the parties: 

Page 3, third line of carry-over bullet, the phrase “20 of its 23” should be 

changed to “23 of its 26”.

Page 3, second line of second full bullet, “23” should be changed to “26”.

Page 5, second line, the exhibit reference should be changed from “FL-SR-4”

to “FL-SR-2”.

Page 5, third line, the phrase “on Southwest” should be deleted. 

Page 10, fourth line from the bottom, the exhibit reference should be changed 

from “FL-SR-4” to “FL-SR-5”.
AirTran regrets any inconvenience these errors may have caused. A corrected 

copy of AirTran’s Reply is being filed in the docket and served on all parties along 

with this Erratum. 

Respectfully submitted,

____________________

Robert W. Kneisley
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2014

p0922 

# Order

Clerk September 29, 2014

148404(19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF M ICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148404

COA: 317517

Wayne CC: 08

- 016055

- FC

ANTOINE DEKYLE BAILEY

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 24, 2014

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Bondy Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Innovative Systems Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Innovative Systems Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Innovative Systems Inc. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated:  February 21, 2006

/s/ Bondy Tan

Bondy Tan

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Global Innovative Systems Inc. and will be retained by Global Innovative Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Alonzo ALVAREZ et al., Relators, v. C. Woodrow LAUGHLIN, District Judge, et al., Respondents.

No. 14112.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 30, 1962.

Hill, King & McKeithan, Mission, Arnulfo Guerra, Roma, for relators.

*916Glenn Ramey, Rio Grande City, Stafford, Atlas, Schwartz & Gurwitz, McAllen, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding in this Court to require Hon. C. Woodrow Laugh-lin, Judge of the 79th District Court of Starr County, Texas, to fix the amount of a supersedeas bond to supersede the judgment in the cause of Mario E. Ramirez et al. v. Virgilio H. Guerra et al., No. 3238, on the docket of the 79th District Court of Starr County, an election contest for the office of School Trustees of the Roma Independent School District of Starr County, in which judgment was rendered in favor of contestants against contestees.

Petitioners herein have applied to the trial judge to fix the amount of a super-sedeas bond herein and, after a hearing, he has refused to do so.

We conclude that under the provisions of Rule 364(e), T.R.C.P., a losing party has a right to require the trial court to fix the amount of a supersedeas bond in a case in which the judgment “is for other than money or property or foreclosure,” unless it is a judgment controlled by some other rule or statute. We know of no other rule or statute which would govern this case.

The fact that the respondents may never be able to recover any damages on such a bond does not in any way change the plain provisions of Rule 364(e), supra, which we construe as making it the ministerial duty of the judge to fix the amount of the supersedeas bond in a case of this nature. Ex parte Kimbrough, 135 Tex. 624, 146 S.W.2d 371; Houtchens v. Mercer, 119 Tex. 431, 29 S.W.2d 1031, 69 A.L.R. 1103; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. State, 107 Tex. 1, 106 S.W. 326.

We do not agree with the contention of respondents that this case is now moot and for that reason the petition should be denied. The term of office of the trustees will not expire until April 1, 1963, some four months away. By seeking an advancement of the hearing of this election contest in this Court, w'e feel that it can be disposed of before the present terms of office expire.

The petition for a writ of mandamus will be granted as prayed for, but the writ of mandamus will not be issued out of this Court unless we become convinced that Judge Laughlin does not intend to fix the amount of the supersedeas bond in keeping with this opinion.
1

Vetter, Cheryl

From: Vetter, Cheryl

Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:27 AM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'

Cc: Long, Pam

Subject: Final draft of Source Determination

Attachments: EO12866_Source Determination_2060-AS06_NPRM_PreambleRule_20150811.docx

Aaron –  

This is the final draft of the source determination package.  The only changes I have made from the version earlier this

week are to the public hearing information.  No changes to the substance of the package.  

Cheryl Vetter 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OAQPS/AQPD/NSRG (C504-03) 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone (919) 541-4391 Fax (919) 541-5509 

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy.
#### Wiley HOLMES, Appellant, v. Charles S. GARLAND, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Nov. 18, 1955.

Smith & Shehan, J. B. Johnson, Harlan, for appellant.

*325James S. Greene, Jr., Hiram M. Brock, Jr., Harlan, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court manda-torily enjoined the appellant to remove an obstruction from an alleged county roadway and permanently enjoined any further obstructions thereon. We are affirming the judgment because the record discloses that the action of the trial court was proper.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-27933]

[[Page 70265]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8955]

Determination and Certification Regarding Assistance to Fiji

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 24, 2014, the Deputy Secretary of State took the 
following action: ``Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Deputy 
Secretary of State, including by section 7008 of the Department of 
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
2014 (Div. K, Pub. L. 113-76), as carried forward by the Continuing 
Appropriations Resolution, 2014 (Pub. L. 113-64), and similar 
provisions in prior year Acts, Executive Order 12163, as amended, and 
State Department Delegation of Authority No. 245-1, I hereby determine 
and certify that, subsequent to the termination of assistance to the 
Government of Fiji after that country's December 2006 military coup, a 
democratically elected government has taken office in Fiji.
    ``This Determination and Certification shall be reported to 
Congress and published in the Federal Register.''

(Signed William J. Burns, Deputy Secretary of State)

    This Determination and Certification has been reported to Congress.

    Dated: October 29, 2014.
J. Paul Reid,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Bureau of East Asian and 
Pacific Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-27933 Filed 11-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-30-P
```
#### Clay J. HERBSLEB, d/b/a Contractors Industrial Service Engineers, Appellant, v. George DUTY, d/b/a Duty Construction Company and Duty Construction Company, Appellee.

No. 4113.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

April 25, 1963.

L. H. Lynch, Houston, for appellee.

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff Herbsleb brought this suit against defendant Duty for 2 weeks’ rental fee of a bulldozer in the amount of $525., and for $300. attorneys’ fees. Plaintiff swore to his petition. Defendant answered by general denial. Trial was before the court without a jury, which, after hearing, entered judgment for plaintiff for the $525. bulldozer rental, and found that plaintiff was not entitled to recover attorneys’ fees.

Plaintiff appeals, contending that the trial court erred in holding that attorneys’ fees cannot be awarded under Article 2226, T.R. C.S., Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.

Article 2226, T.R.C.S. reads:

> “Any person having a valid claim against a person or corporation for personal services rendered, labor done, material furnished, overcharges on freight or express, lost or damaged freight or express, or stock killed or injured, *or suits founded upon a sworn account or accounts,*may present the same to such person * * * and if * * * not been paid * **** may also recover, in addition to his claim and costs, a reasonable amount as attorney’s fees, * *

Plaintiff’s claim is for $525. for rental of a Caterpiller dozer. Rentals of equipment are not expressly covered by the statute. Plaintiff cannot recover attorney’s fees unless his suit was “founded upon a sworn account.”

*959The fact that plaintiff swore to his pleading, does not make such suit “one upon a sworn account.”

Our Supreme Court in Meaders v. Biskamp, 159 Tex. 79, 316 S.W.2d 75 holds:

> “ * * * Respondent contends that the above language of Article 2226 means that an attorney’s fee is recoverable if suit is upon a sworn account as defined by Rule 185, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. This rule is not a rule of substantive law but is a rule of procedure with regard to evidence necessary to establish a prima facie right of recovery or defense, and is not the basis for any cause or causes of action. * * * a sworn account is defined according to its popular sense and applies only to transactions between persons, in which there is a sale upon one side and a purchase upon the other, whereby title to *personal*property passes from one to the other, * *

It follows that attorney’s fees in a suit for rentals of equipment are not provided for by Article 2226, and the fact that plaintiff swears to its petition, cannot constitute such action “a suit founded upon a sworn account”, within the meaning of Article 2226, T.R.C.S.

Plaintiff’s point is overruled and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

L
Hello. My name is Cynthia Linton. I'm a grandmother and I came here from

Chicago to testify. That is how important I think this carbon rule is. So thank you for this opportunity.

I want to speak in defense of nature and how we must preserve it from the destructive activities of men, women and industries, who are on this planet for just a nanosecond compared with the forests, mountains and oceans.

I have always enjoyed being out in nature, from my early days at my grandparents' home in the Rhode Island woods, to summer camp in New Hampshire, to fishing with my late husband in Wisconsin and the Florida Keys. Being out in nature is so restful and helps us put things in perspective.

We owned a condo in the Florida Keys for 10 years. Sitting on our balcony overlooking the ocean. I could smell the salt, feel the warm breezes, and contemplate the sparkling blue and green patterns in the water for hours. I watched pelicans fold up their wings and dive into a school of fish, and long-legged shore birds peck at crabs and other tasty bits along our beach. It was paradise. We especially enjoyed a day on the water in a small boat hoping to catch fish — perhaps some snapper or grouper for dinner.

It got to the point where it really didn't matter if we caught anything. It was being there that was important.
The Keys is one of the few places you can watch the sun rise, and then simply cross the road later to see a magnificent purple and pink sunset.

But, alas, about 10 years ago, two hurricanes in back-to-back years took out our dock with a storm surge and flooded our property — then the next year a third hurricane wiped out homes and businesses just across the street. Insurance rates were skyrocketing and we watched with dismay as a retaining wall had to erected on our beach to keep the water from lapping against the building. We sold our little piece of paradise for fear the advancing ocean would damage it beyond repair.

When I read about global warming and the rising ocean and what it will do to islands and lowlands, I fear that my beloved Keys won't be there for future generations. My children and grandchildren learned to love the Keys.

### But their children may not have that opportunity. To me the erosion and

flooding of coastal areas is very personal. And I know that south Florida, especially, is at risk. Without serious action to stop climate change, the Keys will be under water.

No place on earth is safe from the ravages of climate change and pollution. With Congress unwilling to act, we rely on you, the EPA, to take the sensible steps outlined in this carbon rule. Please do not weaken it. In fact, I urge you to strengthen it. We who love this land and care about its future are looking to you for leadership. Thank you.

Cynthia Linton 990 N. Lake Shore Dr., 15E Chicago, IL 60611 Clinton914@aol.com (312)944-6516