alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.14


Supplementary Agreement


(unofficial English translation)





Party A: Heilongjiang Senyu Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd.


Party B: Heilongjiang Wangda Fodder Inc.





With regard to the new situation arising from the execution of the Cooperation Agreement entered into by Party A and Party B on October 11, 2007, the parties enter into this Supplementary Agreement through friendly negotiation.  The parties shall abide by this Supplementary Agreement and this Supplementary Agreement shall be the basis of the cooperation of the parties.





Since Party A did not have feedstuff operation right, while establishing live pig breeding system, Party A cooperate with Party B and make use of the feedstuff operation right and other advantages of Party B.  Now the cooperation lasts for over one year, and the parties confirm that during the cooperation period, the parties fully performed all of their obligations as agreed.  Until now party A has sold, via Party B, to the farmers feedstuff of over RMB120 million (by credit sale, e.g. the actual creditor of the farmers within the Base is Party A), both parties are fully satisfied with the performance and good faith of the other party. As the business of Party A keeps developing, both parties are willing to go deep into the cooperation in order to get mutual benefits.  In order to make Party A believe that Party B wants to cooperate with Party A, Party B agrees that if Party B unilaterally breaches the agreement, Party B shall assign the debt of the farmers to Party A and fulfill the notification obligation as required by law for debt assignment.  If the assigned debt cannot compensate the losses of Party A, Party B is willing to give the asset of Party B to Party A as compensation (including but not limited to property, equipment, and working capital of Party B), until the losses of Party A which is caused by Party B are fully compensated.  Party B promises that, in order to match with Party A’s the development speed and scale, Party B will improve its production capacity and maintain sufficient liquid capital, in order to assist Party A to realize the production plan of one million live pigs.





This Supplementary Agreement shall have two original copies, each Party A and Party B shall have one copy and each copy shall have the same force.








Party A:

Party B:[Stamp of Party A here]

[Stamp of Party B here]December 12, 2008
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mutteb**~tates ~ourt**  

# of§ppeaIs fortbejfeberaIQCtrcutt

IN RE GERALD M. BENSON AND KENNETH L. SMITH 2012-1663 (Serial No. 09/515,978) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

IN RE GERALD M. BENSON AND KENNETH L. SMITH 2012-1664 (Serial No. 11/061,327) Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
ORDER Case: 12-1664 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 11/08/2012IN RE GERALD BENSON 2 Upon consideration of correspondence from David J. Kappos, Director ofthe United States Patent and Trademark Office regarding the case caption, 

### ITIs ORDERED 

### THAT: The revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT
lsIJan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s26 Case: 12-1664 Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 11/08/2012
Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No 333-106616) and
Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-18278, 33-56420, 33-53303, 333-51073, 333-93803, 333-47268, and
333-102321) of Mandalay Resort Group of our report dated January 21, 2003 relating to the financial statements of Elgin Riverboat ResortRiverboat Casino for the year
ended December 31, 2002, which appears in this Form 10-K of Mandalay Resort Group for the year ended January 31, 2005.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
April 15, 2005

---



QuickLinks
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

AAC Commercial Building Corporation ) 

(d/b/a Huryn Justice General Contractors) ) 

) 

Under Contract No. N40085-11-D-8025 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59633 

Reginald M. Jones, Esq. 

Nicholas T. Solosky, Esq. 

Fox Rothschild LLP 

Washington, DC 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Stephen Bacon, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 1 May 2015 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59633, Appeal of AAC Commercial 

Building Corporation (d/b/a Huryn Justice General Contractors), rendered in 

conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the annual report of Syms Corp (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended February 28, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marcy Syms, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                             /s/ Marcy Syms
                                                 ----------
                                             Marcy Syms
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             Syms Corp
                                             May 20, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FREDERICK RUTHERFORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1959

[October 24, 2019]

Appeal of order denying 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the 

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura Johnson, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 502003CF006439AXXXMB.

Frederick Rutherford, Milton, pro se. 

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS SANTILLAN RANGEL,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-72481

Agency No. A095-733-576

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 13, 2016** 

Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Luis Santillan Rangel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for a

FILED

APR 18 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
continuance and review de novo constitutional claims. Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey,

526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Santillan Rangel’s motion

for a continuance where he failed to show good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an

IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good cause shown); Sandoval-Luna,

526 F.3d at 1247 (the denial of a continuance was within the agency’s discretion

where relief was not immediately available to the petitioner). The agency applied

the correct legal standard in deciding Santillan Rangel’s motion to continue, where

the agency invoked the applicable “good cause” standard and cited pertinent legal

authorities. See Mendez-Castro v. Mukasey, 552 F.3d 975, 980 (9th Cir. 2009)

(concluding that the agency applies the correct legal standard where it expressly

cites and applies relevant case law in rendering its decision). 

We reject Santillan Rangel’s contention that the BIA erred in not specifically

addressing his contention that the IJ failed to discuss the reasons for denying the

continuance, where the BIA conducted a de novo review and provided its own

conclusions based on Santillan Rangel’s failure to establish eligibility for the relief

requested. See Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 2010) (“What is

required is merely that [the BIA] consider the issues raised, and announce its

2 13-72481
decision in terms sufficient to enable a reviewing court to perceive that it has heard

and thought and not merely reacted.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)).

Santillan Rangel’s due process claim fails for lack of error or prejudice from

the agency’s denial of the continuance, where he has not established eligibility for

any relief requested. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000)

(requiring error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 13-72481
Exhibit
      31




**CERTIFICATION**




I,
      Joel Gardner, President, CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer ,
      certify that:




1.
      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Megola, Inc.;




2.
      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make
      the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
      report;




3.
      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects
      the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.
      I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
      registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
      within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
      report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
      quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
      financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a)
      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




*Date:
January
              15, 2008**/s/
              JOEL GARDNER**Joel
              Gardner*President,
              CEO,
              Principal Financial Officerand
              Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         15,777
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,458
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4,270
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    59,834
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         563
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           569
<LOANS>                                        310,892
<ALLOWANCE>                                    5,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 411,268
<DEPOSITS>                                     357,804
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2,689
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            4,281
<LONG-TERM>                                    6,170
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,878
<OTHER-SE>                                     37,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 411,268
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                26,198
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              2,444
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               1,926
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               30,568
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             14,208
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,843
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          15,725
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1,614
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             288
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                12,941
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,951
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     4,951
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,376
<EPS-BASIC>                                  1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.43
<LOANS-NON>                                    619
<LOANS-PAST>                                   28
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               613
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               3,852
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  653
<RECOVERIES>                                   199
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              5,012
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           5,012
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        5,012



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rahim Rayani, President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated: November 21, 2005               /s/ Rahim Rayani             Rahim Rayani, President
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-

OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Robert L. Howard-AndersonName:

Robert L. Howard-AndersonTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




I, Howard M.
Bailey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Howard M. BaileyName:

Howard M. BaileyTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BIOANALYSIS
CORP.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          25,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,180
<INVENTORY>                                     24,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,512
<PP&E>                                          23,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,029
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,875
<BONDS>                                            226
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           111
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,774
<SALES>                                         98,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                98,718
<CGS>                                           48,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   297
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,933
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,219
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,714
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 29, 2009



/S/    DANIEL R.
PASSERIDaniel R. PasseriPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 441 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.441

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
  the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

                                 An Act

 
  To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian 
   Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other 
                                purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS.

  Sections 409(e), 410(h), and 411(i) of the Indian Child Protection 
and Family Violence Prevention Act (25 U.S.C. 3208(e), 3209(h), and 
3210(i), respectively) are each amended by striking ``and 1995'' and 
inserting ``1995, 1996, and 1997''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000853

27-JUN-2013

09:34 AM
OFFICIALNOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOLSTATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711



## 6/2/2015 g: XA7v<£ !l COACaseNo. 12-13-00363-CR Blaylock, Cody Lamont Tr. Ct. No. 114-1070-10 PD-0394-15 

### On this day, this Courthas granted the Appellant's Pro Se motion for an extension oftime in which to file the Petition for Discretionary Review. The time to file the petition has been extended to Wednesday, June 17, 2015. NO FURTHER 

### EXTENSIONS WILL BE ENTERTAINED. NOTE: Petition For Discretionary Review mustbefiled withThe CourtofCriminalAppeals. Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * FILE COPY