alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                             EXHIBIT 10.18

                   SECOND MODIFICATION TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


     Agreement by and between Cardinal Resources, Inc. ("Cardinal") and
Cornerstone Natural Gas, Inc. ("Company") effective as of November 1, 1995;

     WHEREAS, Company entered into that certain Consulting Agreement by and
between Company and James W. Bryant as ("Consultant") dated June 4, 1993
("Consulting Agreement");

     WHEREAS, effective August 1, 1994, Consultant assigned the Consulting
Agreement to Cardinal Resources, Inc., in that Assignment of Consulting
Agreement;

     WHEREAS, the Agreement was modified and amended in the Modification to
Consulting Agreement dated February 15, 1995, a copy of which is attached as
Exhibit "A";

     WHEREAS, Consultant and Company desire to amend the Agreement, as amended,
to reflect the term of the Additional Consultant (as defined in the Modification
to Consulting Agreement) and the extension of the Agreement;

                           W I T N E S S E T H :

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and
agreements, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, and
intending to be legally bound, the Company and Cardinal agree to modify the
Agreement, as amended, as follows:

     1.   EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT.  The Consulting Agreement, as amended, will be
extended for one additional year and will terminate on November 1, 1997.

     2.   ADDITIONAL CONSULTANT.  The term of the Additional Consultant, as set
out in the Modification to Consulting Agreement, shall be amended to run
concurrently with the term of the Consulting Agreement, as amended, and any
extension thereof, currently expiring on November 1, 1997. The additional
$50,000 compensation for the Additional Consultant will remain unchanged during
the term of the Consulting Agreement.

     3.   All other terms and conditions of the Agreement, as amended, shall not
be changed, modified, or enlarged except as specified in this Second
Modification to Consulting Agreement.

<PAGE>

                                            "Consultant"
                                       CARDINAL RESOURCES, INC.



                                       By:       /s/ JAMES W. BRYANT
                                          -----------------------------------

                                            "Company"
                                       CORNERSTONE NATURAL GAS, INC.



                                       By:       /s/ RAY C. DAVIS
                                          -----------------------------------
                                                Ray C. Davis, CEO


                                       JAMES W. BRYANT, CONSULTANT AND
                                       GUARANTOR



                                       By:     /s/ JAMES W. BRYANT
                                          -----------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FIRSTCITY LIQUIDATING TRUST DECEMBER 31, 1997 FORM 10-K FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FIRSTCITY LIQUIDATING TRUST
DECEMBER 31, 1997 FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     86,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,963
<SALES>                                         44,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,079
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,272
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,652
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Bondy Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer of Global Innovative Systems Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Innovative Systems Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Global Innovative Systems Inc.                                                             |

Dated:  August 22, 2005

/s/ Bondy Tan

Bondy Tan

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Global Innovative Systems Inc. and will be retained by Global Innovative Systems Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC1"'ON AGENCY 


REGION 10 


1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3140 

OFFICE OF 

AIR, WASTE AND TOXICS 

October 14,2010 

Mr. Brad Broker 

Air Quality Monitoring Coordinator 

Idaho Department of Environmental Quality 

1410 North Hilton 

Boise, ID 83706-1255 

Dear Mr. Broker: 

We have evaluated the 2010 Idaho Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan, which 

describes the Idaho monitoring network for 2010-11. IDEQ proposes the following changes 

to the air monitoring network: 

1) DEQ proposes to initiate PMcoarse monitoring at the Meridian S1. Luke's NCore 

site, beginning January 1, 2011, and report this data to AQS. DEQ will calculate PMcoarse 

concentrations by calculating the mass difference between data collected from the existing 

PM2.5 FRM at S1. Luke's, and the PMW FRM proposed for that site. EPA approves this change. 

2) DEQ proposes increasing the sampling frequency at the Salmon PM2.5 monitoring site 

to daily (1: 1). The monitor currently operates every third day (1:3). EPA approves this change. 

The following monitors are designated "core" monitors because they are either: 1) 

required by 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 2) have a design value near or above the new PM2.5 

24-hour standard of 35ug/m3, or 3) they are essential monitoring parameters at NCore sites: 

1. 	 PM2.5 FRMs (or Approved Regional Method): 

a) Nampa (primary and co-located) 

b) MeridianlS1. Luke's Hospital 

c) Pinehurst 

d) Salmon 

e) Franklin 

t) St Maries 

2. 	 PM2.5 speciation monitors and pre-cursor gas monitors at the MeridianlS1. Luke's 

Hospital NCore site. 

"Core" monitors are those monitors in the network that must be operated with 

available PM2.5 monitoring funds. The "non-core" PM2.5 monitors in the State's network 

can be operated at IDEQ's discretion with any remaining federal funds or State funds. If you 

have any questions about our approval of the Idaho monitoring network, please contact Keith 

Rose at (206) 553-1949. 

oPtillred on R«;yC/edPtIP8I' 
Sincerely, 

D~Cti(1~l State and Tribal prograr:t~~r . ­

cc: 	 Mike McGown, 100 

Bruce Louks, IDEQ 

Keith Rose, OAWT 

Chris Hall, OEA 

2
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Honorable To-2 C. Kins, pa,vo 2 

of $2,500.00 for sach moabar of the Board 

during each year of tho current biennium. 

QpSour 0pirrPon is respectfully requested as follol!:s: 

"1. Is the appropriation to be read 

in the light of the gcncral stztuts, so as 

to co~clud0 that the LeSLslature appropriated 

$2,500.60, Or-~0 '.7UCil thC:xeOf LIS ?,Oy bs P.EC6amry for the pnyrcknt Of 0 par dfcz~; or 

"2. Ecs there a valfii apprcp% tion 

of a sal%ry OS l/12 of $2,500 per sonth 

for w~oh member?" 

It is uur opinion that the I,e&islctur~, by 

providing in the Ee~sr%&nl;a~l Appropriation Eill for 

the currsnt bienniu:3 (5mata Dill Zo. 427, 1&h Legislature) an nppropriation of $5?,5GO~ TOI’ CXIC~ Gf the 

three mombors of the BtEsLe l3oard of Bairdre~sors and 

CCWr~tOlG~i8tS, inlxuded that this ~-,o;;ey should be 

disbursed in uccorilnnc3 with the twxxz of Sc;cGion 7 

of articl.6 73&b, Swmntt: Annotatc,d Penal Code, 1::hich 

YGU qUGt0 in your latter. The general Lav: on the cubjcot vcould ordinarily prevail ever a occflicting provision in the a~proprintlon bill. -2% d0 Cot, hGWaVC!r, 

believe that tbess is any conflfct bctwcn the lx;o. 

The general ridor to the Departxsntol Ap;briipriotkoJl 

Bill (at totto of jX$!.o I./+6 of I;ha Su~:~plems to the 

Scnsto Journal for June 13, 2339) contains the folloxing provision: 

"The approgriaticnn herein provided 

ore to ts oon:;trucd. as the llsxinram su3s 

to 33 a::prspriated, toand for the swer'~I. 

purposcr, rramod hercin'~ * *I1 
. . - 

CabQlini., 11~5 morass 472, 170 S. V. 1036:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6049

SIDNEY LEE CUTCHIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-380-R)

Submitted: September 10, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sidney Lee Cutchin, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), as

amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996,

Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to

the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny

such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. Cutchin v. Angelone, No. CA-95-380-R (W.D. Va.

Dec. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Herbert LEAMON et al., Appellants, v. Vada LEAMON, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 24, 1957.

Joseph Martin, Edmonton, Cecil C. Wilson, Glasgow, for appellants.

Charles W. Huddleston, Robert L. Dowell, Edmonton, for appellee.

BIRD, Judge.

To properly appraise the judgment from which this appeal is taken we shall look into the manner in which it was conceived and delivered.

In 195S, Herbert Leamon and his wife, Lizzie, filed this action, 151, against Vada Leamon, his former wife, charging that she was in possession of his farm; that she would not leave; that he was the owner *625in fee; that she was casting a cloud upon his title by her possession; and he in substance asked the court to declare his legal ownership and right to ppssession.

Vada filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, asserting that no claim was made upon which relief might be granted. Vada haying filed no cross-appeal it will not be necessary to discuss the sufficiency of Herbert’s pleadings.

Vada then filed an answer in which she pleaded a divorce judgment awarding her the full and complete use of the farm until the further orders of the court. This judgment was in full force and effect at the time action 1S1 was filed.

With that answer she filed a counterclaim in which she sought to recover $500 with which she had paid off a mortgage on the farm and $3,000 for permanent improvements on the property. This counterclaim was dismissed on Herbert’s motion but the answer was allowed to remain in the record.

With the divorce judgment in effect, Herbert made a motion to modify it and restore him to possession. None of the pleadings in that case are in this record. Nevertheless, the trial court in the present action, 151, sustained Herbert’s motion to modify the divorce judgment and, by the same order in action 151, awarded Vada $500 for the mortgage payment, $1,000 for her other rights in the property and $30.00 per month for the maintenance of a crippled son.

Vada’s counterclaim having been dismissed, and there being no order of consolidation to bring the pleadings of the divorce case into this record, there is consequently no pleading whatsoever upon which the court could predicate the judgment entered. The record disclosing no issue by consent or waiver, it is mandatory that the judgment be warranted by the pleadings. Cecil v. Cecil’s Ex’rs, 185 Ky. 787, 215 S.W. 794; Buskirk v. Joseph, 313 Ky. 773, 233 S.W.2d 524; Eddington’s Adm’x V. Eddington, 295 Ky. 548, 175 S.W. 2d 12.

The judgment, not being warranted by the pleadings, is reversed for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LANGER
BIOMECHANICS GROUP, INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 29, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES,
THERETO.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                         918,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,379,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                    62,653
<INVENTORY>                                  1,189,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,639,609
<PP&E>                                       3,745,018
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,799,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,738,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,924,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,806
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,483,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,738,191
<SALES>                                     11,145,054
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,145,054
<CGS>                                        7,186,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,314,668
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (10,499)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (336,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,724)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (335,274)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (335,274)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 4, 2019

NO. 03-18-00013-CR

Exavier Ruffin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
Chemfab Corporation - August 1998
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                               CHEMFAB CORPORATION
                                  SUBSIDIARIES


Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of Chemfab Corporation

Hi-Temp Materials, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of Illinois.

Birdair Structures, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of New York.

Canton Bio-Medical, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of New York.

CHEMFAB  Overseas  Corporation,  incorporated  under  the  laws of the  State of
Delaware.

CHEMFAB  Holdings,  organized under the laws of the Republic of  Ireland/Bermuda
Resident.

CHEMFAB Europe, organized under the laws of the Republic of Ireland.

Chemical  Fabrics  Ireland,  Ltd.,  organized  under the laws of the Republic of
Ireland.

CHEMFAB International  Corporation,  incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware.

CHEMFAB FSC, Inc., organized under the laws of Barbados, West Indies.

Advanced Facilities, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of New York.

Fluorocarbon Fabrications Ltd., organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.

CHEMFAB Holdings U.K. Ltd., organized under the laws of the United Kingdom.

Tygaflor  Ltd.  (formerly  CHEMFAB U.K.  Ltd.)  organized  under the laws of the
United Kingdom.

Iberflon, S.A., organized under the laws of Spain.

Chemfab (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., organized under the laws of the People's Republic of
China.

Chemfab  do Brasil  Industria  e  Comercio  Ltda.,  organized  under the laws of
Brazil.

Chemfab Luxembourg S.ar.l organized under the laws of Luxembourg

Nitto Chemfab Co., Ltd. organized under the laws of Japan

Chemfab Japan, Ltd. organized under the laws of Japan

Chemfab (Singapore) Pte Ltd organized under the laws of Singapore

Tygaflor  Holdings,  organized under the laws of the Republic of Ireland/Bermuda
Resident

Chemfab  Japan,  organized  under the laws of the  Republic  of  Ireland/Bermuda
Resident

Chemfab  Brazil,  organized  under the laws of the  Republic of  Ireland/Bermuda
Resident

Chemfab  China,  organized  under the laws of the  Republic  of  Ireland/Bermuda
Resident

Chemfab Germany GmbH, organized under the laws of Germany
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0                     716
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  51,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                 (1,326)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  27,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  90,824
<PP&E>                                               0                 492,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                (73,259)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 547,815
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  52,898
<BONDS>                                              0                 289,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                  57,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 547,815
<SALES>                                         93,220                 116,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,220                 116,605
<CGS>                                           63,805                  79,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,743                 111,876
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (834)                   (965)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,617                  17,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (519)                (12,103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (82)                 (4,769)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (437)                 (7,334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (437)                 (7,334)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>