alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 660

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for transportation by

the Department of Defense of certain children requiring specialized medical services in the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 3 (legislative day, MARCH 27), 1995

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for transportation by the Department of Defense of certain children requiring specialized medical services in the United

States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION OF CERTAIN CHILDREN

4 WITH DISABILITIES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 157 of title 10, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing new section:
2

•S 660 IS

1 ‘‘§ 2643. Certain disabled children in Pacific Rim re2 gion: transportation to Hawaii for medi3 cal care

4 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—Subject to subsection (c), the Sec5 retary of Defense may provide persons described in sub6 section (b) with round-trip transportation on a space7 available basis from an airport in a country or other entity

8 in the Pacific Rim region to the State of Hawaii. Such

9 transportation shall be provided without charge.

10 ‘‘(b) PERSONS COVERED.—Persons eligible to be pro11 vided transportation under this section are—

12 ‘‘(1) minor children residing in the Pacific Rim

13 region who (A) have been admitted for necessary

14 medical treatment at a medical facility in Honolulu,

15 Hawaii, that specializes in the care of crippled chil16 dren at no cost to the patient, but (B) are unable

17 to afford the costs of transportation to Hawaii; and

18 ‘‘(2) in the case of any such child, one adult at19 tendant.

20 ‘‘(c) CONDITIONS.—The Secretary may provide

21 transportation under subsection (a) in any case only if the

22 Secretary determines that—

23 ‘‘(1) the provision of that transportation is not

24 inconsistent with the foreign policy of the United

25 States;
3

•S 660 IS

1 ‘‘(2) the child to be provided the transportation

2 is in condition of health adequate for safe travel;

3 ‘‘(3) the transportation is for humanitarian

4 purposes; and

5 ‘‘(4) adequate arrangements have been made

6 with sending and receiving entities before the provi7 sion of such transportation at the location of depar8 ture and arrival.’’.

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

10 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding

11 at the end the following new item:

‘‘2643. Certain disabled children in Pacific Rim region: transportation to Hawaii

for medical care.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection withthe accompanying quarterly report of Whittier Energy Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, (the “Report”), I, BryceW. Rhodes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to myknowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2006 | */s/ Bryce W. Rhodes*   | * * |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|----------|
|                    | Bryce W. Rhodes         |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 24 (Monday, February 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 7759]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02157]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-99445; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-058]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of 
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade Shares of the 
Global X Bitcoin Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based 
Trust Shares

January 30, 2024.
    On August 4, 2023, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the Global X Bitcoin 
Trust under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on August 23, 2023.\3\ On September 26, 2023, the Commission designated 
a longer period for Commission action on the proposed rule change.\4\ 
On November 17, 2023, the Commission instituted proceedings under 
section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \5\ to determine whether to approve or 
disapprove the proposed rule change.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98156 (Aug. 17, 
2023), 88 FR 57490. Comments on the proposed rule change are 
available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-cboebzx-2023-058/srcboebzx2023058.htm.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98531, 88 FR 67829 
(Oct. 2, 2023).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98981, 88 FR 82439 
(Nov. 24, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 26, 2024, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change 
(File No. SR-CboeBZX-2023-058).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-02157 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ending September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Rahim Rayani, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 28, 2006
                                           /S/ RAHIM RAYANI
                                           ----------------
                                           Rahim Rayani
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

August 15, 2005

 

In connection with the Large Scale Biology CorporationQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Kevin J. Ryan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(1)          theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          thatinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Large Scale BiologyCorporation for the fiscal period covered by the Report.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Kevin J. Ryan                      |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Kevin J. Ryan                          |
|   |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | Large Scale  Biology Corporation       |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6754
GUY LANCASTER RICHMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARYLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA96-808-WMN) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Guy Lancaster Richmond, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Barry Chazen,Mindy S. Kursban, MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, SHIPLEY, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Richmond v. Maryland Correctional Institution , No. CA-96-808-WMN (D. Md. May 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a) OR 15D-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Dean A. Wiltse, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Greenfield

Online, Inc. (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Dean A. WiltseDean A. WiltsePresident and Chief Executive Officer
 Date: August 27, 2004
#### Carroll Steven COOKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas PYE; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-17269.

D.C. No. CV-00-01854-DFL.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2002 *.

Decided July 30, 2002.

*109Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Cooks’s motion for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Carroll Steven Cooks appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his section 1983,1985 and 1986 claims against employees of the California State Bar Association. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) for failure to state a claim. *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). Where a party lacks standing, this Court must address the issue sua sponte. *See Bernhardt v. County of Los Angeles,*279 F.3d 862, 868 (9th Cir.2002). On that basis, we affirm.

Cooks contends state bar employees failed to prevent a suspended attorney from representing Cooks at his criminal trial, and failed to comply with state bar rules when processing his complaint against the attorney.

Taking all of Cooks’s allegations as true, Cooks lacks standing to bring this action because he has not shown an injury in fact fairly traceable to the Appellees’ conduct that is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision. *See Bernhardt,*279 F.3d at 868-69. Consequently, this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider Cooks’s case on the merits. *Id.*

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0570
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6911

SYLVIA RYAN WEBSTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VANESSA ADAMS, Alderson Prison Camp,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Chief

District Judge. (CA-03-690-1)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 20, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sylvia Ryan Webster, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sylvia Ryan Webster appeals the district court’s order

accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing her complaint filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and

also considered under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the

Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Webster v.

Adams, No. CA-03-690-1 (S.D.W. Va. filed May 13, 2004 & entered

May 14, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 IMPRESO, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
November 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.3.
    
    Item 4 Controls and Procedures in the Companys Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by
reference.
   /s/ Susan M. AtkinsName:
    
    Susan M. AtkinsTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greenfield Online, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 to be filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report),
I, Robert E. Bies, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. Date: August 27, 2004
    
    By: /s/ Robert E. BiesRobert E. BiesExecutive Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Greenfield Online, Inc. and will be retained by Greenfield Online,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Soyo Group,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the  undersigned,  Ming
Tung Chok,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


 /s/ Ming Tung Chok
-----------------------
Ming Tung Chok
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 6, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50420

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARMANDO HERRERA-MUNOZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-1926-ALL

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Armando Herrera-Munoz

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. UnitedStates, 523

U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision

and not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492

F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007). The Government's motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000725813
<NAME> YVETTE DESMARAIS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         8287000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 17460000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    363000
<INVENTORY>                                   15837000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              45227000
<PP&E>                                        42729000
<DEPRECIATION>                                21825000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                79736000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         12249000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        848000
<OTHER-SE>                                    65091000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  79736000
<SALES>                                       65511000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              65511000
<CGS>                                         43430000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 43430000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              12986000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               86000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                9009000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2865000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6144000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6144000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74
        


</TABLE>
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-064-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)