alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0                     752
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  39,918
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                 (1,236)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  23,348
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  74,756
<PP&E>                                               0                 485,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                (65,738)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 529,473
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  42,366
<BONDS>                                              0                 281,772
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                  55,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 529,473
<SALES>                                         39,623                  49,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,623                  49,831
<CGS>                                           28,265                  37,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,546                  52,384
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (327)                   (507)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,958                   8,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,568)                (10,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (235)                 (1,799)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,333)                 (9,107)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,333)                 (9,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00171

- CR

Chase Eugene Anderson
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 187th District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2017CR13683

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court
orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
February 27, 2020
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nolan K. Bushnell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


November 14, 2008                                  By: /s/ NOLAN K. BUSHNELL
                                                       -----------------------
                                                       Nolan K. Bushnell
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 

P.3d 556, 558 (2008) (citations omitted); see NRS 34.160. It is within this 

court's discretion to determine whether a writ petition will be considered. 

Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 

(1991). Petitioners bear the burden of demonstrating that this court's 

extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. 

Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Writ relief is generally 

available, however, only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate 

remedy in the ordinary course of law. NRS 34.170. Moreover, this court 

has held that the right to appeal is typically an adequate legal remedy 

precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841. 

Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this 

matter, we conclude that petitioners have not demonstrated that our 

intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted. NRAP 21(b)(1), 

Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

cc: Hon. Joanna Kishner, District Judge 

Law Offices of Terry L. Wike 

Murchison & Cumming, LLC/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10363 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

− Appellee ,

v ersus
MIGUEL UBBEN , Defendant

− Appellant , NAVIDAD A. UBBEN,
Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northe rn District of Texas USDC No. 3:12

- C V

- 6 4 9

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10363 Document: 00512493100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/08/2014No. 13

- 10363

In this civil action, the appellants challenge the garnishment of property by the United States in partial satisfaction of restitution imposed on an underlying criminal conviction. Appellant Navidad Ubben claims the property was her separate properly un der Texas law and that the district court failed to follow state law by refusing to hold a hearing, thus denying procedural due

process. The district court issued a short but sufficiently explanatory order, dated January 24, 2013, noting that the Ubbens had the burden “to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the garnished accounts contain separate prop

erty, which usually requires tracing of the funds ” (citing United States v. Ingram , No. 4:04

- CV

- 868

- A, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2102, at *13

- 14 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 2005)). The court concluded that “[b]ecause [the Ubbens] have not made even the slightest attempt at showing that the accounts contain separate properly and have not disputed any facts raised by the government, a hearing is not necessary and the . . . exemption [from garnishment] does not apply.” There is no error, and the judgment, being based on the Final Order of Gar nishment, is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-10363 Document: 00512493100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/08/2014
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by

assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2002). 

NO. 07-02-0343-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JANUARY 8, 2003

______________________________

C. JASON WAGNER, INDIVIDUALLY, AND D/B/A

THE WAGCO CO., APPELLANT

V.

T. J. MEARS AND ZONA MEARS, INDIVIDUALLY AND

IN THEIR CAPACITY AS TRUSTEES FOR THE 

MEARS FAMILY LIVING TRUST, APPELLEES

_________________________________

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 48,464-C; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, SJ.1

In this proceeding, appellant Jason Wagner, individually and d/b/a The Wagco Co.,

appealed a judgment in favor of appellees T.J. Mears and Zona Mears, individually and

in their capacity as trustees for the Mears Family Living Trust.
2

However, the parties have now filed a motion in which they certify that they have

settled and compromised all claims and controversies between them and neither of them

desires to pursue the appeal. The motion is in proper form and is filed before this court

has rendered any opinion in the case.

 Accordingly, the parties’ motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(a). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no motion for

rehearing will be entertained and the mandate will issue forthwith.

John T. Boyd

Senior Justice
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

June 4, 2019

No. 04

- 17

- 00338

- CV

Travis CROW, Britt A. Crow, Laurian Crow Edison, and Karen A. Kraft

, Appellant s

v.

Heddie Knappick LOOKADOO, Lisa Knappick Lucas, Mary Brown, Margaret Brown Nugent, Charles Brown, Joseph Gallagher, Josephine Brown Noll, Pamela Gallagher Palmer, and Irene B. Zoeller, Appellee s

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 10

- 00188

- CVL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants have filed a Sixth Response to Abatement, in which appellants assert the parties jointly request that we extend the abatement of this appeal for thirty days so that the parties may effectuate the terms of their settlement agreement. The request is GRANTED

. It is
ORDERED that appellants file, on or before July 3, 2019, a response in this court addres sing whether the abatement should be lifted and the appeal reinstated on the docket of this court.
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1, 43.2; see Caballero v. Heart of Texas Pizza, L.L.C. , 70 S.W.3d 180, 180 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2001, no pet.).

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 4th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTL E

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000725261
<NAME> DYCO OIL AND GAS PROGRAM 1984-1 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         233,440
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,337
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               310,777
<PP&E>                                      30,207,698
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,756,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 881,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,804
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     819,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   881,809
<SALES>                                        501,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               508,551
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  313,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                195,080
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            195,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   195,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    35.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1

Ostigaard, Crystal

From: Dorcas Halverson [dorcash@hotmail.com]

Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 9:19 AM

To: Ostigaard, Crystal

Subject: Designate Yellowstone County, Montana, as a non-attainment area for air quality.

I can remember when we knew (coming from Hardin) when we hit the hill coming down into 

Billings because of the smell and the difficulty breathing and were pleased when it got 

better but later we have smelled Billings almost to Hardin. It is time for a clean up. My 

family came thru last summer from Wash. and had problems breathing which they thought it 

might be dust but I'm sure it was the sulphur. Please crack down on the polluters. Montana 

air is precious ..Lets keep it clean and healthy. Dorcas Halverson
Exhibit 32.2



PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shaun D. C. Edwardes,
Executive Vice President, Acting Chief Financial Officer and director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | 
|Date: July 20, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Shaun D.C, Edwardes                                             
|                    |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Acting Chief Financial Officerand director



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Woodrow COOPER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 36607.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1964.

No attorney of record on appeal, for appellant.

Frank Briscoe, Dist. Atty., Carl E. F. Dally, James C. Brough and Joe C. Shaffer, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The offense is drunk driving; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

The appellant, who walks with a limp and has a speech defect, was involved in a minor collision between the pickup truck he was driving and an automobile driven by David W. Kemptner. Police officers who investigated and Mr. Kemptner testified that from their observation of him they formed the opinion that the appellant was intoxicated.

A blood test taken with appellant’s consent was examined by City Chemist Floyd E. McDonald, who testified that the test showed an alcohol content of .2 per cent alcohol and that persons with the widest tolerance for alcohol become intoxicated with a .1 per cent alcohol content in their blood.

The appellant testified that he did not drink and that some 4 ounces of medicine his doctor had given him, which he was told contained alcohol, was the only alcohol he had consumed on the day in question.

The evidence is sufficient to sustain the jury’s verdict.

The record contains no formal bills of exception or exceptions relating to the court’s charge.

The informal bills present no error which would warrant reversal.

The judgment is affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William Whittle, Vice President and Treasurer of Big Bear Gold Corporation, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Big Bear Gold Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 14, 2005

/s/ William Whittle					William Whittle
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Raybor Management Inc. (the Company), in his capacity and as of the date set forth below, does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 10-QSB Report) that to his knowledge:



(1)    the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    the information contained in the
10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 14, 2003

/S/    JEFFREY D. HOYALJeffrey D. Hoyal President and Chief
Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Raybor Management, Inc. and will be retained by Raybor Management, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual
report of Trinity Place Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 2, 2013 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark D. Ettenger, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Mark D. Ettenger                            | 
|----------------------------------------------- | 
|Mark D. Ettenger                                | 
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|Trinity Place Holdings Inc.                     | 
|July 1, 2013                                    |
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
To Restrac, Inc.:
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8, pertaining to the
Restrac, Inc. 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Restrac, Inc. 1996 Stock Option and
Grant Plan and the Restrac, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, of our
report dated October 25, 1996 on the financial statements and schedule included
in this Form 10-K. It should be noted that we have not audited any financial
statements of the Company subsequent to September 30, 1996 or performed any
audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.
 
                                            /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
December 19, 1996