alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Dalrada Financial Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June
30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
I, Brian Bonar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do each hereby certify,
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: October 13, 2005


/s/ Brian Bonar
-----------------------
Brian Bonar
Chief Executive Officer
#### J. C. WOODARD, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28575.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 21, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State. ■

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50 and 3 days in jail. '

Judgment.was rendered on April 9, 1956, and recites that appellant appeared and entered a plea of guilty before the court.

Under Art. 762, C.C.P., two days were allowed'for filing motion in arrest,of judgment, and under Art. 755, C.C.P., he had ten days in which to file a motion for new trial.

The'time for filing such motions expired and the term of court ended before the motions relied upon by appellant were filed.

The conviction .having become final during the March term of the trial court, notice of appeal during said term was requisite in order to confer jurisdiction of the appeal upon this court. Art. 827, C.C.P.’

We observe further that the record contains a stipulation that the jail term has been served and shows that the fine and costs have been paid.

The appeal is dismissed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Bondy Tan, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Lightscape Technologies Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lightscape
      Technologies Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Lightscape Technologies Inc.                                                                       



Dated: November 13, 2007



| | */s/ Bondy Tan*                           
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Bondy Tan                                 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer     
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal   
| | Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
| | Officer)                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lightscape
Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Lightscape Technologies Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           15,517
<SECURITIES>                                      8,788
<RECEIVABLES>                                       261
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0       
<INVENTORY>                                         520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 25,495
<PP&E>                                            4,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   30,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9,496
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         54,976
<OTHER-SE>                                         (490)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     30,294
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3,685
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 19,464
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (234)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (14,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (14,684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (14,684)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (1.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (1.43)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.34


 





 


November 3, 2016


 


ZAIS Group LLC


2 Bridge Ave Suite 322


Red Bank, NJ 07701


 


Ms. Nisha Motani


[Address Redacted]


 


Dear Nisha,


 


Subject to the approval of the Board of Directors, effective
December 1, 2016, you will assume the office of Acting Chief Financial Officer of ZAIS Group Holdings, Inc. Accordingly, effective
December 1, 2016, your base salary will be increased to $300,000 per annum, payable in semimonthly installments and subject to
all federal, state, and local withholdings, and deductions for your participation in the ZAIS Group LLC (“ZAIS”) employee
benefit plans.


 


Furthermore, for the year ended December 31, 2016, you will
receive guaranteed incentive compensation in the amount of $125,000 (“2016 Guaranteed Incentive Compensation”) to be
paid in cash by ZAIS in the first quarter of 2017 on such date that is consistent with the timing of the payment of ZAIS’
2016 discretionary incentive compensation awards, but no later than March 15, 2017 (“2017 Payment Date”). Payment of
2016 Guaranteed Incentive Compensation is contingent upon your not being terminated for Cause (as defined in the ZAIS Group LLC
Employee Handbook) or not voluntarily resigning prior to the 2017 Payment Date. In the event of 1) your voluntary termination of
your employment by ZAIS prior to the 2017 Payment Date or 2) involuntary termination by ZAIS for Cause (as defined in the ZAIS
Group LLC Employee Handbook) prior to the 2017 Payment Date, 2016 Guaranteed Incentive Compensation will be forfeited in its entirety.


 


The terms of this letter do not constitute an employment contract.
Your employment with ZAIS will continue to remain at-will. You understand that a copy of this letter will be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained herein will be made public.


 


Regards,


 


	/s/ Michael F. Szymanski	 	/s/ Nisha Motani
	Michael F. Szymanski	 	Accepted and Agreed: Nisha Motani


 


		CC:	Ann O’Dowd, Christian Zugel
Exhibit 31.2
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Reginald P. Jones, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of StratageneCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and to the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.                        Date: June 14, 2004 By:  /s/ Reginald P. Jones    Reginald P. Jones    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6696

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. WEBSTER DOUGLAS WILLIAMS, III , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. R. Bryan Harwell , Chief District Judge. ( 4:12

- cr
- 00969

- RBH

- 1 )

Submitted : July 21, 2020 Decided: July 24, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Webster Douglas Williams, III, Appellant Pro Se. Lauren L. Hummel, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublis hed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Webster Douglas Williams, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for disqualification and recusal, pursuant to 28 U

. S

. C

. §§ 144, 455(a) (2018). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Williams’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Ligh tsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### Robert ANDREWS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27909.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 4, 1956.

' John W. McDonald, Temple, for appellant.

Raymond Thornton, Dist. Atty., Belton, and Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary with the intent to commit the crime of rape; the punishment, six years.

The statement of facts was filed more than 90 days after the notice of appeal was given. Appellant asks that we consider the statement of facts, even though filed too late, and attached to his motion an affidavit of the court reporter from which we quote the pertinent portion, as follows:

> “Counsel for the defendant has duly made application for the Statement of Facts in said case and has paid for said record but I am unable to complete the same and furnish it to him within the time required by law because of the press of other duties in said District Court of Bell County, Texas.”

Recently, in Whitley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 238 S.W.2d 774, we were confronted with a similar situation. We there. held that an affidavit such as the one before us *427here did not show diligence because it did not show when the appellant’s attorney gave the reporter the order for the preparation of the statement of facts.

In Hart v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 653, 218 S.W. 1054, we held that the failure of the appellant to apply to the court for mandamus in time to compel the reporter to complete the statement of facts was evidence of his lack of diligence and that this Court would not consider a statement of facts which was filed too late unless there was some, affirmative showing of diligence on the part of appellant or his counsel.

The bill of exception found in the record and contentions asserted in appellant’s brief cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts.

The proceeding appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.11

                         ALL AMERICAN FOOD GROUP, INC.
                                LEASE ABSTRACT



LANDLORD: Santo V. Sorce Co., LLC
          414 East Essex Street
          Hackensack, NJ 07601

TENANT:   The Company

PROPERTY: 104 New Era Drive
          South Plainfield, NJ 07080

SQUARE FOOTAGE:     22,324 square feet of space until January 31, 2002 (the
                    "Initial Space"); 29,324 square feet of space (the entire
                    premises) from February 1, 2002 until the Expiration Date
                    (the "Additional Space").

COMMENCEMENT
     DATE:          February 15, 1997

EXPIRATION DATE:    January 31, 1997

OPTION:   One five year option to renew on the same terms and conditions
          as current lease (the "Renewal Term").

RENT:     $9,301.67 per month from April 1, 1997 until January 31, 2002;
          $13,440.17 per month for the remainder of the lease (no rent is due
          for the period from February 15, 1997 to March 31, 1997).


ADDITIONAL SPACE:   Prior to February 1, 2002, Landlord may lease all or part
of the Additional Space to a third party and Tenant may increase the Initial
Space with the addition of any part of the Additional Space not then occupied
or under lease to be occupied by a third party.

TAXES/INSURANCE/ OTHER CHARGES:    Tenant shall pay: its pro rata share of all
real estate, ad valorem or other property taxes assessed against the premises
for land, building, fixtures or improvements; common area maintenance charges;
property insurance, comprehensive general liability insurance and rent
insurance.
<PAGE>   2
ASSIGNMENT:   The lease is assignable only with the written permission of the
Landlord and is not assignable during the Renewal Term.

DEFAULT:  Events of default include:
          1. all or any part of the premises become vacant due to Tenant's
             removal, ejectment or eviction from, or abandonment of the
             premises;
          2. Tenant does not make payment of rent or other charges when due
             and such default continues for fifteen (15) days after written
             notice from Landlord;
          3. Tenant fails to perform any of its other obligations under the
             lease;
          4. Tenant fails to comply with any federal, state or local
             statutes, rules, ordinances, orders, regulations and
             requirements; or
          5. Tenant files for bankruptcy.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Allen “F” Calton, Appellant

No. 06-15-00062-CV v.

Steve Schiller, et al., Appellees

Appeal from the 153rd District Court of 

Tarrant County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 153-

270690-14). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Allen “F” Calton, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 16, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

MARIO SAUSVILLE-MACIAS,

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2618 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 113 DB 2016

Attorney Registration No. 27356

(Out of State)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of July, 2019, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Mario Sausville-Macias is suspended from 

the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years, and he shall comply with all the 

provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board 

pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
<PAGE>



                                                                  Exhibit 99.1




    CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
          RELATING TO A PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


      I, Marc D. Olin, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Joseph J. Whang, Chief
Financial Officer, of Printcafe Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation, hereby
certify that:

      (a) The Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

      (b) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                      * * *


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER                     CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


/s/ Marc D. Olin                            /s/Joseph J. Whang
------------------------------            ----------------------------
Marc D. Olin                              Joseph J. Whang

Date: November 14, 2002                   Date: November 14, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                         Consent of Independent Auditors




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8) listed below of Trusted Information Systems, Inc. of our report dated
March 2, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Trusted Information Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as amended on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 26, 1997.


     1)  No. 333-20311    1994 Stock Option Plan
     2)  No. 333-20313    Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan
     3)  No. 333-24849    Amended and Restated 1996 Directors' Stock Option Plan
     4)  No. 333-30971    1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan




                                                   /s/Ernst & Young LLP


Vienna, Virginia
March 24, 1998
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2197

To extend the authorized period of stay within the United States for certain

nurses.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. FAIRCLOTH (for himself and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and considered

A BILL

To extend the authorized period of stay within the United

States for certain nurses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZED PERIOD OF STAY

4 FOR CERTAIN NURSES.

5 (a) ALIENS WHO PREVIOUSLY ENTERED THE UNIT6 ED STATES PURSUANT TO AN H–1A VISA.—

7 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

8 provision of law, the authorized period of stay in the

9 United States of any nonimmigrant described in
2

•S 2197 CPS

1 paragraph (2) is hereby extended through September

2 30, 1997.

3 (2) NONIMMIGRANT DESCRIBED.—A non4 immigrant described in this paragraph is a non5 immigrant—

6 (A) who entered the United States as a

7 nonimmigrant described in section

8 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(a) of the Immigration and

9 Nationality Act;

10 (B) who was within the United States on

11 or after September 1, 1995, and who is within

12 the United States on the date of the enactment

13 of this Act; and

14 (C) whose period of authorized stay has ex15 pired or would expire before September 30,

16 1997 but for the provisions of this section.

17 (3) LIMITATIONS.—Nothing in this section may

18 be construed to extend the validity of any visa issued

19 to a nonimmigrant described in section

20 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(a) of the Immigration and Nation21 ality Act or to authorize the re-entry of any person

22 outside the United States on the date of the enact23 ment of this Act.

24 (b) CHANGE OF EMPLOYMENT.—A nonimmigrant

25 whose authorized period of stay is extended by operation
3

•S 2197 CPS

1 of this section shall not be eligible to change employers

2 in accordance with section 214.2(h)(2)(i)(D) of title 8,

3 Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect on the day be4 fore the date of the enactment of this Act).

5 (c) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 30 days after the

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General

7 shall issue regulations to carry out the provisions of this

8 section.

9 (d) INTERIM TREATMENT.—A nonimmigrant whose

10 authorized period of stay is extended by operation of this

11 section, and the spouse and child of such nonimmigrant,

12 shall be considered as having continued to maintain lawful

13 status as a nonimmigrant through September 30, 1997.

Æ