alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Bondy Tan, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Innovative Systems Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: November 18, 2005

 

/s/ Bondy Tan

Bondy Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### Jewel VENTERS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Nos. 37574-37577.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 13, 1965.

Rehearing Denied March 3, 1965.

No attorney of record on appeal for appellant.

Frank Briscoe, Dist. Atty., Carl E. F. Dally, James C. Brough and James I. Smith, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The appellant waived a jury and pleaded guilty to the offense of forgery as charged in the above causes, and his punishment was assessed at three years in each case. The court not having cumulated the sentences, they are concurrent and authorize appellant’s confinement in the State Department of Corrections for a term of not less than two years nor more than three years. Art. 774, C.C.P.

The statement of facts reveals that appellant forged the name of James Papadokis to four American Express Company checks, each in the sum of $100. He passed two of them to Montgomery Ward and attempted to pass the other two.

*803The appellant so testified and his voluntary statement in which he confessed to having done so was introduced, as were the checks described in the respective indictments and the testimony of witnesses at the examining trial stipulated by appellant and his counsel and by the District Attorney as true.

The proceedings appear to be regular and in compliance with Arts. 10a and 12, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. relating to pleas of guilty before the court in non-capital felony cases.

The judgments are affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 402 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 402

 To provide for the appointment of 1 additional Federal district judge 
     for the eastern district of Wisconsin, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 14 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the appointment of 1 additional Federal district judge 
     for the eastern district of Wisconsin, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT 
              OF WISCONSIN.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Wisconsin Federal 
Judgeship Act of 1995''.
    (b) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
eastern district of Wisconsin.
    (c) Tables.--In order that the table contained in section 133 of 
title 28, United States Code, shall reflect the change in the total 
number of permanent district judgeships authorized under subsection 
(a), such table is amended by amending the item relating to Wisconsin 
to read as follows:

``Wisconsin:
    ``Eastern........................................                 5
    ``Western........................................              2''.
    (d) Holding of Court.--The chief judge of the eastern district of 
Wisconsin shall designate 1 judge who shall hold court for such 
district in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
                                 <all>
```
June 20, 2015

Mr. Jamie C. Hopkins

Mr. Kevin D. Jackman

Aerial Media FL LLC

921 51st Street Gulf, Apartment C

Marathon, FL 33050

Dear Messrs. Hopkins and Jackman:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

§§ 45.23, 47.3, 61.3, 61.315(b)(2) and (3) 91.119, 91.153, 91.155, 91.167, 91.169, 91.203,

91.207, 91.209, 91.409, 91.411, 91.417 , and part 21 of Title 14, Code o f Federal Regulations

(14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next

30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your May 18 , 2015

, exemption request on behalf of Aerial Media FL LLC into

the public docket (No. FAA− 20 15

− 1749 ), but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us al l of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of t he exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

B rittany Newton

P rogram Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12319]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Brilliant Exiles: American Women in Paris, 1900-1939” at the National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-02452 Filed 2-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit
99 - Additional Exhibit





MANAGEMENT’S
REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL


OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING







Management
of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company's internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The
Company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that:




·pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;





·provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures
of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the Company; and





·provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of the Company's assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements.




Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.




As
required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, management
assessed the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework.




Based on
our assessment and those criteria, management believes that the Company internal
controls over financial reporting are effective as of December 31,
2007.




BY:
            /s/ Ralph
  HensonRalph
      Henson, President and Principal  Executive
    OfficerBY:
            /s/ Richard
      BruggemanRichard
      Bruggeman Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10378 Summary Calendar

BILLY WAYNE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ANN RICHARDS, also known as Governor of Texas; ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:93-CV-359

- - - - - - - - - - May 21, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Texas prisoner Billy Wayne Williams, No. 365918, has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint. The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) applies to this appeal. See Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional Facility , 105 F.3d 972, 973-76 (5th Cir. 1997). Williams has complied with theNo. 96-10378 - 2 - certification requirements of the PLRA and his motion for leave to proceed IFP is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that Williams authorize the appropriate prison authorities to withdraw the initial partial filing fee of $7.85 from his trust fund account in accordance with the procedures required by the prison and to forward payment of the initial partial filing fee to the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Thereafter, Williams shall make periodic payments to the clerk of the same district court until the full appellate filing fee of $105 is paid. To accomplish these periodic payments, Williams is directed to execute all consents and forms required by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, to authorize the withdrawals from his trust fund account. In accordance with its standard procedure, the prison having custody of Williams is directed to periodically forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10. Williams contends that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. We have carefully reviewed the record and the briefs and AFFIRM for the reasons adopted by the district
court. See Williams v. Richards , No. 2:93-CV-0359 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 1996 and March 29, 1996).
IFP GRANTED; INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE ASSESSED; JUDGMENTNo. 96-10378 - 3 -
AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Stanley Tepper, certify that:
         1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dalrada
Financial Corporation (the "Company");

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report.

         4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

                 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

                  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;

         5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions);

                  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal controls over financial reporting.


Date: May 13, 2005


/s/ Brian Bonar


Brian Bonar
Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE 

(William W. and Dieva L. Smith) 

This AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is made as of March 25, 2017, by and between Smith Micro
Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and William W. Smith, Jr. and Dieva L. Smith, JT/WROS (“Holder”), and amends that certain Secured Promissory Note, dated February 7, 2017, issued by the
Company to Holder in the principal amount of $1,000,000 (the “Note”). Capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined in this Amendment have the meanings given to such terms in the Note. 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the
parties desire to extend the Maturity Date of the Note as set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

Section 1. Amendment to Note. Effective as of the date hereof, the Maturity Date of the Note is hereby extended to June 26,
2017. 
 Section 2. Effect of Amendment. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, no other changes or modifications to
the Note are intended or implied by this Amendment. To the extent of any conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Note, the terms of this Amendment shall control. 

Section 3. Miscellaneous. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, all of which taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument, and any of the parties to this Amendment may execute this Amendment by signing any such counterpart. Facsimile and electronically copied signatures on this Amendment shall be deemed the equivalent of original signatures.
This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 

[Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 

  
 1 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed or caused this Amendment to be duly executed
by their respective authorized representatives as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	COMPANY:
	
	SMITH MICRO SOFTWARE, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Steven M. Yasbek
	Name:	 	Steven M. Yasbek
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer

  

	
	HOLDER:
	
	William W. Smith, Jr.
	
	/s/ William W. Smith, Jr.
	
	Dieva L. Smith
	
	/s/ Dieva L. Smith


  
 2