29096 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 96 / Friday, May 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and determined that this rule 

does not have implications for 

federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children From 

Environmental Health Risks 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves establishment of a 

temporary safety zone. This rule is 

categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 

2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A 

preliminary environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

and a Categorical Exclusion 

Determination are available in the 

docket where indicated under 

ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or 

information that may lead to the 

discovery of a significant environmental 

impact from this proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security Measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T11–564 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T11–564 Safety Zone; Coronado 

Fourth Of July Fireworks, Glorietta Bay; 

Coronado, CA 

(a) Location. The zone will include all 

navigable waters within 800 feet of the 

fireworks barge located in Glorietta Bay 

in approximate position: 32° 40′43.0′′ N, 

117° 10′14.3′′ W. 

(b) Enforcement Period. This section 

will be enforced from 8:45 p.m. to 10:00 

p.m. on July 4, 2013. If the event 

concludes prior to the scheduled 

termination time, the Captain of the Port 

will cease enforcement of this safety 

zone and will announce that fact via 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

(c) Definitions. The following 

definition applies to this section: 

Designated representative, means any 

commissioned, warrant, or petty officer 

of the Coast Guard on board Coast 

Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and 

local, state, and federal law enforcement 

vessels who have been authorized to act 

on the behalf of the Captain of the Port. 

(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit 

through or anchoring within this safety 

zone is prohibited unless authorized by 

the Captain of the Port of San Diego or 

his designated representative. 

(2) All persons and vessels shall 

comply with the instructions of the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his 

designated representative. 

(3) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast 

Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, 

flashing light, or other means, the 

operator of a vessel shall proceed as 

directed. 

(4) The Coast Guard may be assisted 

by other federal, state, or local agencies. 

Dated: May 2, 2013. 

S.M. Mahoney, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port San Diego. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11747 Filed 5–16–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2013–0044; FRL–9814–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Tennessee; 

Transportation Conformity Revisions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by the State of 

Tennessee, through the Tennessee 

Department of Environment and 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 96 / Friday, May 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules 29097 

Conservation, Bureau of Environment, 

Air Pollution Control Division, on July 

12, 2012. This revision consists of 

updates to transportation conformity 

criteria and procedures related to 

interagency consultation and 

enforceability of certain transportationrelated control and mitigation measures. 

The intended effect is to update the 

transportation conformity criteria and 

procedures in the Tennessee SIP. This 

action is being taken pursuant to section 

110 of the Clean Air Act. In the final 

rules section of this issue of the Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the State’s 

SIP revision as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period 

on this document. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this 

document should do so at this time. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before June 17, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2013–0044, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4–RDS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2013– 

0044,’’ Air Quality Modeling and 

Transportation Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Kelly 

Sheckler, Air Quality Modeling and 

Transportation Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal 

holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which 

is located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amanetta Somerville or Kelly Sheckler, 

Air Quality Modeling and 

Transportation Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Somerville’s telephone number is 404– 

562–9025. She can also be reached via 

electronic mail at 

sheckler.kelly@epa.gov. Ms. Sheckler’s 

telephone number is 404–562–9222. She 

can also be reached via electronic mail 

at sheckler.kelly@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

additional information see the direct 

final rule which is published in the final 

rules section of this issue of the Federal 

Register. 

Dated: May 8, 2013. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11678 Filed 5–16–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 54 

[CC Docket Nos. 01–92 and 94–45; GN 

Docket No. 09–51; WC Docket Nos. 10–92, 

07–135, 05–337, and 03–109; WT Docket No. 

10–208; Report No. 2975] 

Petition for Reconsideration of Action 

in Rulemaking Proceeding 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petition for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: In this document, a Petition 

for Reconsideration and Clarification 

(Petition) has been filed in the 

Commission’s Rulemaking proceeding 

by David Cohen on behalf of United 

States Telecom Association. 

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must 

be filed on or before June 3, 2013. 

Replies to an opposition must be filed 

on or before June 11, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexander Minard, Wireline 

Competition Bureau, (202) 418–7400 or 

TTY: (202) 418–0484. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of Commission document 

Report No. 2975, released May 1, 2013. 

The full text of Report No. 2975 is 

available for viewing and copying in 

Room CY–B402, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC, 20554, or may be 

purchased from the Commission’s copy 

contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. 

(BCPI) (1–800–378–3160). The 

Commission will not send a copy of this 

Notice pursuant to the Congressional 

Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), 

because this Notice does not have an 

impact on any rules of particular 

applicability. 

Subject: Connect America Fund: A 

National Broadband Plan for Our 

Future; Establishing Just and Reasonable 

Rates for Local Exchange Carriers; HighCost Universal Service Support; 

Developing a Unified Intercarrier 

Compensation Regime; Federal-State 

Joint Board on Universal Service; 

Lifeline and Link-Up; Universal Service 

Reform—Mobility Fund, document DA 

13–332, published at 78 FR 22198, April 

15, 2013, in WC Docket Nos. 10–90, 07– 

135, 05–337, 03–109, GN Docket No. 

09–51, CC Docket Nos. 01–92, 96–45, 

WT Docket No. 10–208, and published 

pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 

1.4(b)(1) of the Commission’s rules. 

Number of Petitions Filed: 1. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Gloria J. Miles, 

Federal Register Liaison, Office of the 

Secretary, Office of Managing Director. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11796 Filed 5–16–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 54 

[WC Docket Nos. 10–90 and 05–337; Report 

No. 2976] 

Petition for Reconsideration of Action 

in Rulemaking Proceeding 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petition for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: In this document, a Petition 

for Reconsideration (Petition) has been 

filed in the Commission’s Rulemaking 

proceeding filed by Derrick Owens, 

Jerry Weikle, Gerald J. Duffy, and 

Richard A. Askoff on behalf of the 

Western Telecommunications Alliance, 

the Eastern Rural Telecom Association, 

and the National Exchange Carrier 

Association, Inc. 

DATES: Oppositions to the Petition must 

be filed on or before June 3, 2013. 

Replies to an opposition must be filed 

on or before June 11, 2013. 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS