alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001013274
<NAME> IBW FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,733
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             988
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,700
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    137,970
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        107,270
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,194
<DEPOSITS>                                     212,474
<SHORT-TERM>                                    33,733
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,496
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        500
<COMMON>                                           668
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 265,194
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  9,115
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,953
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   712
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,780
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,409
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,871
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (221)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,239
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,239
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,696
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.05
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,819
<LOANS-PAST>                                       275
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,587
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,700
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      814
<RECOVERIES>                                       386
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,272
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,272
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,629


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      15,346,254
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               39,878,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,747,151
<PP&E>                                      24,397,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             164,513,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,971,371
<BONDS>                                     33,731,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       185,939
<OTHER-SE>                                 106,198,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               164,513,812
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            93,785,117
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               59,064,156
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             4,783,306
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,968,206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,416,208
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,162,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,254,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,254,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02538]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 8, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 45 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-177, CP2024-183.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-02538 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gerry Lee McCOY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6442.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 11, 2002.

Decided Aug. 26, 2002.

Gerry Lee McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, Office of The United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal in this case was received in the district court after expiration of the appeal period. Under *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 *690L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), the notice is considered filed as of the date Appellant delivered it to prison officials for forwarding to the court. Because Appellant alleges that he timely delivered his notice of appeal to prison authorities, we remand the case for the district court to deter-mine the timeliness of the filing under *Houston v. Lack.*The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

*REMANDED.*
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

*CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB/A for the quarter ended October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Blair P. Mowery,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

1.              the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.              the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: March 22, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Blair P.  Mowery                   |   |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Blair P. Mowery                        |
|                  |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|                       |        |                                        |        |  |

 

1

----
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 457

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 1995

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to update

references in the classification of children for purposes

of United States immigration laws.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 457 RFH

1 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF CHILD.

2 Section 101(b) of the Immigration and Nationality

3 Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)) is amended—

4 (1) in paragraph (1)—

5 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘le6 gitimate child’’ and inserting ‘‘child born in

7 wedlock’’; and

8 (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘an

9 illegitimate child’’ and inserting ‘‘a child born

10 out of wedlock’’; and

11 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘an illegit12 imate child’’ and inserting ‘‘a child born out of wed13 lock’’.

Passed the Senate July 17 (legislative day, July 10),

1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TEODORA RUFINO TORRES,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72184

Agency No. A074-819-783

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 9, 2012** 

Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Teodora Rufino Torres, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to reopen. We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.

FILED

OCT 15 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72184

In her opening brief, Rufino Torres fails to address, and therefore has

waived, any challenge to the BIA’s dispositive determination that her motion to

reopen was untimely. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011)

(a petitioner waives an issue by failing to raise it in the opening brief).

In light of our disposition, we need not reach Rufino Torres’ remaining

contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Placeholder for information received claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

Information regarding gas apportionment claimed as CBI dated June 4, 2010 and July 7, 2010 

(updated information) received from a U.S. semiconductor manufacturing facility. This 

information is being maintained in a separate confidential portion of the docket. 

For more information, please contact Kirsten Cappel by phone at (202) 343-9556 or by email at 

cappel.kirsten@epa.gov.
#### Fred Franklin DAVIDSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 38870.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 15, 1965.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 2, 1966.

William Lane, Jr., Marshall, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDONALD, Presiding Judge.

The offense is theft of property over the value of $50.00; the punishment, seven years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

Appellant’s confession was introduced, which recited that he went to the Lewis Motor Company and tried out an automobile, a 1962 Ford Galaxie. After the salesman left, appellant drove the car away and kept it several months. No one gave him permission to take the car.

Appellant testified that after being incarcerated, he tried to escape twice, but later became religious. He admitted stealing the car and making a statement, relating that he went to the District Attorney’s office and wanted to give a statement. He had asked if Texas had an habitual criminal statute, and stated that he had been in penitentiaries three times, one of which was for automobile theft; that he robbed someone in 1953 and wrote some checks in California. He testified that he had a sign painted on the automobile and that he put fictitious license plates on the car.

Appellant contends that he did not have an attorney at the time he made the confession. There is no showing that he requested an attorney, and this case does not come under Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977. See McDonald v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 395 S.W.2d 48, and the authorities therein cited.

 Appellant also contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion *809for continuance because his court appointed attorneys did not have time to prepare for trial. The docket entry, which can be considered by this Court, because it was entered in the minutes of the trial court, recites that three attorneys were appointed on the 12th day of June, 1964, and that a plea of guilty before the jury was made January 25, 1965. Counsel were appointed over seven months prior to trial, and they were officially notified of their appointment over four months prior thereto.

The motion for continuance was not signed and sworn to by appellant and cannot be considered. Parsons v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 387, 271 S.W.2d 643; Lillard v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 237, 312 S.W.2d 517.

We find the evidence sufficient to sustain the verdict.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
Page 1 of 3 

Disposition Comments 

Docket No: FAA-2011-0456 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NE-15-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3201EN-E

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM 

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

 Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

 Make the following changes to the AD: 
Page 2 of 3 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here 
Page 3 of 3 

Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3201EN-E

 

ASE Printed Name: Alan Strom 8/24/11 Date 

 

Branch Manager Date
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

PRESERVATION WELLNESS TECHNOLOGIES 

LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS INC, 

EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION, NEXTGEN 

HEALTHCARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2016-2193, 2016-2194, 2016-2195

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 2:15-cv-01559-WCB, 

2:15-cv-01561-WCB, 2:15-cv-01562-WCB, Circuit Judge 

William C. Bryson.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

NICOLE DOMINIQUE GALLI, Law Offices of N.D. Galli 

LLC, Philadelphia, PA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

MICHAEL TIMOTHY RENAUD, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, PC, Boston, MA, argued for all 

defendants-appellees. Defendant-appellee Nextgen 
 

Healthcare Information Systems LLC also represented by 

SANDRA BADIN, MICHAEL NEWMAN, JAMES M. WODARSKI. 

BRIAN DOUGLAS SIFF, Duane Morris LLP, New York, 

NY, for defendant-appellee Allscripts Healthcare Solutions Inc. Also represented by ASHLEY TAYLOR CORBIT,

HARNAIK S. KAHLON, Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila, 

Chicago, IL.

ANTHONY ALLEN TOMASELLI, Quarles & Brady, LLP, 

Madison, WI, for defendant-appellee Epic Systems Corporation. Also represented by CARLY LEVIN, KRISTIN 

GRAHAM NOEL, MARTHA JAHN SNYDER; LOUIS A. KLAPP, 

Chicago, IL 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 April 12, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 134 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code to make permanent the credit for 

increasing research activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. HOLT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code to make permanent 

the credit for increasing research activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF RESEARCH CRED4 IT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41 of the Internal Rev6 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (h). 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Paragraph (1) of 

8 section 45C(b) of such Code is amended by striking sub9 paragraph (D). 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 134 IH

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after 

3 December 31, 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Rahim Rayani, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date:  November 22, 2006
                                          /S/ RAHIM RAYANI
                                          -----------------
                                          Rahim Rayani
                                          Chief Executive Officer and President
                                          Chief Financial Officer
|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| þ |   | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|   |   | For the fiscal year ended December 27, 2011 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| o      |   | TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|   |   | For the transition period from                         to                         |

|                                                                                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                             |  |  |
| Delaware(State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or Organization)                       |   | 04-2723701(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                                                        |   |   |
| 3630 South Geyer Road, Suite 100,St. Louis, MO(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |   | 63127(Zip Code) |

|                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |  |  |
| Title of Each Class                                   |   | Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
| Class A Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share |   | The NASDAQ Global Select Market |

|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Large accelerated filer þ |   | Accelerated filer o |   | Non-accelerated filer o |   | Smaller reporting company o |
|                           |   |   |   | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

----

----

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |
|                  | PANERA BREAD COMPANY |
|                  |   |   |
| Date:  March 20, 2012 | By: | /s/ WILLIAM W. MORETON |
|                  | Name: | William W. Moreton |
|                  | Title: | President and Co-Chief Executive Officer |

----

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |  |
| Exhibit Number | Description |
|           |   |
| 31.3           | Certification by Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|           |   |   |
| 31.4           | Certification by Co-Chief Executive Officer |
|           |   |   |
| 31.5           | Certification by Chief Accounting Officer |
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SE PTEMBER 4, 2019

NO. 03

- 18

- 00013

- CR

Exavier Ruffin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BA KE R, A ND SMITH AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the pa rti es’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because app ell ant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.