alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1238 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1238

  To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to allow 
amounts under the Troubled Assets Relief Program to be used to provide 
          legal assistance to homeowners to avoid foreclosure.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2011

Ms. Kaptur (for herself, Mr. LaTourette, and Mr. Turner) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to allow 
amounts under the Troubled Assets Relief Program to be used to provide 
          legal assistance to homeowners to avoid foreclosure.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aiding Those Facing Foreclosure Act 
of 2011''.

SEC. 2. FORECLOSURE AVOIDANCE ASSISTANCE.

    Section 109 of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (12 
U.S.C. 5219) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(d) Legal Assistance.--
            ``(1) Use of funds.--The Secretary may use any amounts made 
        available under this title that are not otherwise obligated to 
        provide assistance to nonprofit counseling intermediaries and 
        nonprofit legal organizations to provide legal assistance to 
        homeowners of owner-occupied homes consisting of from one to 
        four dwelling units who have mortgages on such homes that are 
        in default or delinquency, in danger of default or delinquency, 
        or subject to or at risk of foreclosure, to assist such 
        homeowners with legal issues directly related to such default, 
        delinquency, foreclosure, or any deed in lieu of foreclosure or 
        short sale.
            ``(2) Prohibition on litigation.--Paragraph (1) may not be 
        construed to authorize the use of any amounts made available 
        under this title to provide, obtain, or arrange on behalf of a 
        homeowner, legal representation involving or for the purposes 
        of civil litigation that is not directly related to any such 
        default, delinquency, foreclosure, or any deed in lieu of 
        foreclosure or short sale.
            ``(3) Authorization.--Amounts used as described under 
        paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be for actions authorized 
        under this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
## OXWICE OF



# THE ATTORNEY 

# GENERAL

AVSTIN.TEXAS PRICE DANIEL AlroRNEYGENERAL 

### iMu8ry 19,1939 &r: J, L. B&air Oouoty Auuitor, ulbarger oowaty **Varnoa,** tax88. - L \

.

yatptiteru

APPBOYHD I (Ugxwd: **-8ld c.**  **BAA) Arr3ruih;I**  **OurSAAL 09**  **SXAS** 

### ET (algaod: 2Mjwln bedell) **k8i8tMt**
**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Bondy Tan, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Innovative Systems Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.              Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)        designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)       evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)        disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)        all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)       any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 22, 2005

 

/s/ Bondy Tan

Bondy Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-60975) andForm S-8 (File Nos. 2-91950, 2-93578, 33-18278, 33-29014, 33-39215, 33-56420,33-53303, 333-51073, 333-93803, 333-93805, 333-47268, and 333-102321) ofMandalay Resort Group of our report dated March 6, 2003 (except for Note 18, asto which the date is April 2, 2003) (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Mandalay ResortGroup's adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, *Accounting for Derivative Instruments and HedgingActivities*, No. 138, *Accountingfor Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities – an Amendmentof FASB Statement No. 133*, and No. 142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets*), appearing in thisAmendment No.1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of MandalayResort Group for the year ended January 31, 2003.

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Las Vegas, Nevada

June 25, 2003

 

----
SERVED JULY 9, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CLARE ELAINE SPEARING 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0003 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2010-0313 

••i'n' \ 

HEARING NOTICE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing in this case will be held on July 27, 2010, 

beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time at the following location: 

Jacob K. Javits Federal Building 

26 Federal Plaza 

New York, NY 10278 

Allow time to pass through security. 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment-Service List 
FAA DOCKET NO. CP10EA0003 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Clare Elaine Spearing, Respondent 

703 Atlantis 

5 Parliament Street 

Hamilton HM 12 

Bermuda 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 532

AN ACT

To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VENUE.

4 Paragraph (3) of section 1391(a) of title 28, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the defendants are’’

6 and inserting ‘‘any defendant is’’.

Passed the Senate March 30 (legislative day, March

27), 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 532

AN ACT

To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other

purposes.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose PRIETO-VEGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50011.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2002.*

Decided July 31, 2002.

Before: BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Prieto-Vega appeals his conviction by guilty plea and sentence for one count of importation of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. Prieto-Viega’s contention that he was indicted, convicted, and sentenced pursuant to unconstitutional statutes is foreclosed by *United States v. Mendoza-Paz,*286 F.3d 1104, 1109-119 (9th Cir.2002), and *United States v. Varelar-Rivera,*279 F.3d 1174, 1175 n. 1 (9th Cir.2002). His contention that the statutes’ mens rea requirement applies to drug type and quantity is foreclosed by *United States v. Carranza,*289 F.3d 634, 644 (9th Cir.2002).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR**


**RULE
      15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
        connection with the quarterly report of Renewable Energy Resources, Inc.
        (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
        the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Kenneth
        Brown, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
                  August 29,
                  2007
              By:
              /s/ Kenneth
                BrownKenneth
                BrownChief
                Executive Officer and
                Acting Principal Financial Officer
### D[P IO FTR^'^pORWi ^

f ' • • ' "•• • SERVED : JANUAR Y 5 , 201 0 , , U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTE RO F WILLIA M A . LUKER , JR . FA A DOCKE T NO . CP09SW000 8 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2009-104 4

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2009SW700191 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o th e undersigned . Al l fiiture pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Ronni e A . Yoder Chie f Administrativ e L a Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP09SW000 8 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y WilliamA . Luker , Jr. , Responden t 11907 Winterthu r

Lane , Apt . PH 3 Reston,V A 20191-193 7 TEL : 571-271-218 4 Elly n Ponton , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , ASW-7G 5 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 MeachamBoulevar d For t Worth , T X 76137-429 8 TEL : 817-222-508 9 FAX : 817-222-509 2 Th e Honorabl e Ronnie A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE12-32 0 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366r214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building - Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 . -2 -
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________ No. 02-2003

________________ Jamie N. Estes, Appellant,

v. Dean Joerling; Thomas Lasater, also known as Thomas Lassiter, also known as Thomas Lassater; St. Louis County, Missouri; Suzanne L. Hawkins; Mary Ann Hawkins, Appellees. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. [PUBLISHED]

________________ Submitted: November 4, 2002 Filed: February 5, 2003

________________ Before HANSEN, Chief Judge, BEAM and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

________________ PER CURIAM. After a fire destroyed Jamie N. Estes's home, she filed an insurance claim in excess of $100,000. Police and insurance investigators concluded that the fire had been set intentionally and that Estes's insurance claim was fraudulent. She was charged in Missouri state court with second-degree arson and attempted stealing by deceit. The trial court denied Estes's motions to suppress, found her guilty after a1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 2 bench trial, suspended imposition of her sentence, and placed her on probation. In federal court, Estes's insurance company secured a judgment declaring that her claim was not covered by her insurance policy because her intentional or criminal acts caused the fire and her claim misrepresented that certain personal property had been destroyed in the fire. See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Estes , 118 F. Supp. 2d 968 (E.D. Mo. 2000). We affirmed in an unpublished per curiam opinion. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Estes , No. 00-3640 (8th Cir. June 15, 2001). Estes then sued under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985, alleging that defendants-- consisting of two police officers, St. Louis County, and two private citizens--had framed her in violation of her constitutional rights. The district court 1 granted defendants' motion for summary judgment. Estes appeals. The district court articulated several reasons why defendants' summary judgment motion should be granted. "We review the District Court's grant of summary judgment de novo and may affirm on any basis supported by the record." Wilson v. Spain , 209 F.3d 713, 716 (8th Cir. 2000). The district court correctly concluded that collateral estoppel bars Estes's lawsuit. SeeSimmons v. O'Brien , 77 F.3d 1093, 1096 (8th Cir. 1996) (elements of collateral estoppel). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We deny appellees' motions for damages and costs under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.3 A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS WITH REGARD TO HALIS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

                             TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
                         Certified Public Accountants
                           3340 Peachtree Road, N.E.
                                   Suite 250
                               Atlanta, GA 30326


     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report to the Board of
Directors and Stockholders of Halis, Inc. and Subsidiaries dated April 7, 2000
accompanying the Consolidated Financial Statements of Halis, Inc. as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, included in the June 30, 2000 amended Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A for HealthWatch, Inc.



/s/ Tauber & Balser, P.C.
-------------------------
TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia
September 28, 2000
EXHIBIT 23



                              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


       We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 No. 2-89831, No. 33-61946 and No. 333-07139 and Form S-3
No. 33-18264) pertaining to the 1986 Stock Option Plan, the 1991 Stock Option
Plan and the 1991 Chemfab Employee Stock Option Plan, the Amended and Restated
1991 Stock Option Plan, and the 1986 Stock Option Plan and the 1983 Incentive
Stock Option Plan of our report dated July 29, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Chemfab Corporation included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1997.





Boston, Massachusetts
September 15, 1997
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Reese, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8471.]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of De cisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2016-O HIO -8471 T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLEE , v. R EESE , A PPELLANT . [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State v. Reese, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-8471.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Gonzales , and cause remanded to trial court for further proceedings. (No. 2016-0656—Submitted December 20, 2016—Decided December 30, 2016.) A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Muskingum County, No. CT2015-0046, 2016-Ohio-1591.

_______________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Gonzales , ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-8319, ___ N.E.3d ___, and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decision in Gonzales

. O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur. O’D ONNELL , J., dissents.S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 _________________ D. Michael Haddox, Muskingum County Prosecuting Attorney, and Gerald V. Anderson II, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Barnhart Law Office, L.L.C., and Robert B. Barnhart, for appellant.

_________________
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

# **Co-Registrant(Commission File Number 000-30761):**

# ** **

**UbiquiTelInc.**

**OneWest Elm Street**

**Suite400**

**Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428**

 

**Co-Registrant (Commission File Number333-39950):**

 

**UbiquiTel Operating Company**

**One West Elm Street**

**Suite 400**

**Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428**

 

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED**

## **PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTelOperating Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Donald A. Harris, Chief Executive Officer of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTelOperating Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company.

 
|     | UBIQUITEL INC.                         |
|----------|----------------------------------------|
|     |                                   |
|     | * *                               |   |
| * * | */s/ Donald A. Harris*                 |   |
|     | Donald  A. Harris                      |   |
|     | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|     |                                   |
|     |                                   |
|     | UBIQUITEL OPERATING  COMPANY           |
|     |                                   |
|     |                                   |
| * * | */s/ Donald A. Harris*                 |   |
|     | Donald  A. Harris                      |   |
|     | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|     |                                   |
|     | May  10, 2005                          |

 

----