alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT

TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Igor Gonda, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of VIVUS, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2015; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Igor GondaIgor GondaPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 9, 2016
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belmar Capital Fund LLC (the "Fund"), that:

     (a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
          March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
          Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (b)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  the  results  of
          operations of the Fund for such period.

A SIGNED  ORIGINAL OF THIS  WRITTEN  STATEMENT  REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED  TO THE FUND  AND WILL BE  RETAINED  BY THE FUND AND  FURNISHED  TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

 Dated: May 15, 2003



                                           /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                           ---------------------------
                                               Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                               Chief Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03

- 20

- 00064

- CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E RO SE, JUSTICES BAKER A ND TRIANA
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the tr i a l court. Having review ed

th e record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal,

both in this Court and in the court below.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03

- 20

- 00065

- CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E RO SE, JUSTICES BAKER A ND TRIANA
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the tr i a l court. Having review ed

th e record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal,

both in this Court and in the court below.

### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03

- 20

- 00066

- CR

Zachery Angel Lucero, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 51ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTIC E RO SE, JUSTICES BAKER A ND TRIANA
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

Thi s is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having review ed

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Appellant shall pa y all costs relating to this appeal,

both in this Court and in the court below.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 30, 2020

p0622 

# Order

Clerk June 30, 2020

160897

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160897

COA: 344800

Wayne CC: 18

- 001034

- FC

MAURICE DARNELL JOHNSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 26, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is conside red, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133684 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133684 COA: 274982 Oakland CC: 1998-161396-FC RAND WALTER GOULD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         315,412
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,753,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,615,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,818,148
<PP&E>                                       9,113,925
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,220,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,823,826
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,625,285
<BONDS>                                      2,095,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,102,417
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,823,826
<SALES>                                     18,682,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,682,075
<CGS>                                       14,903,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,903,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   466
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             194,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,192,493
<INCOME-TAX>                                   367,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            825,493
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   825,493
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-3883 Directorate ID: 2014-SW-029-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS332L2 and EC225LP helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): Four Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in frame 5295, which could lead to 

loss of the helicopter frame’s structural integrity and consequently, loss of helicopter control.

Costs:

Installing the cut-outs on frame 5295 would require 40 work hours for a labor cost of $3,400. Parts would cost $5,000 f

helicopter of $8,400 and $33,600 for the U.S. fleet. 

Inspecting helicopter frame 5295 would require 2 work-hours for a labor cost of $170 

per helicopter. No parts would be needed for a total U.S. fleet cost of $680 per inspection 

cycle.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Gary Roach
Exhibit 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  and in  connection  with the filing by Soyo Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  of its
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), the undersigned does hereby certify that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  May 13, 2003                  By:  /s/ MING TUNG CHOK
                                          -----------------------
                                          Ming Tung Chok
                                          President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer





Date:  May 13, 2003                  By:  /s/ NANCY CHU
                                          -----------------------
                                          Nancy Chu
                                          Chief Financial Officer
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 531

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 29, 1995

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in an in

banc hearing of a case to continue to participate in

that case after taking senior status, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

4 The last sentence of section 46(c) of title 28, United

5 States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘eligi6 ble’’ and by inserting before the period at the end of the

7 sentence ‘‘, or (2) to continue to participate in the decision

8 of a case or controversy that was heard or reheard by the
2

S 531 RFH

1 court in banc at a time when such judge was in regular

2 active service’’.

Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day,

September 25), 1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
DATES OF iNSERTION 12

August ), 2009, re

You, as vendor, are auth

follows: Advertisement .to be pulto be in capitals and subject mattl notice adveing; charge to be occupying similar space; advertise

contract awarded to it hereunder,sex, religious creed, ancestry, age discrimination, shall have the right toset forth.

Proof of advertising in the by the editor or publisher) to Age.

Commonwealth to be billed

ACCOUNT FUND DEPT

CODE fr

CQ ‘i

INVOICE (To be completed ‘by pu

r5.1 DATE OFIR

IstAd

2nd Ad

‘ 3rdAd

Comjponw aith of Penrisylvan

County ofJUC

Before me, the subscriber, a N

who being Øuly worn, doth deposn

the 4,ucS U. LLLri-r ii

that the advertisement, of which tearsin the editions of said newspaper, in therefor at a rate higher than is charg and set in a similar manner, in said nev

Swo n and sulscribd before n

ne LthLrie. Q..ta-k

‘tibO

Lton

ular advertising columns of said newspaper, 3nd that the Commonwealth is not charged

ar amount of matter occupying similar space

So UREOFAFFIANT

5oFPENNSYLV

NOt1ilSeal I ieift Donn Notaiy Public I lIiytw Um, BucIcCotmty I

O 3, 2013 I

NOTICE

proposed ReViSIOfl 10 Plflfl5YlVofl5 State

ImplemefltOliOfl Plan incOrparatIng the

DieseI powered

Motor Vehicle IdilaS Act;

Public Hearing

I SIGNSOE FOR AGENCY

dvertisement in your newspaper, subject to the terms of this order, asusing columns, no position specified; caption of two lines and signature be set solid in type regularly used by_your newspaper for public (legal)

led to and paid by commercial advertisers for matter similarly set and editions specified above. Vendor agrees that, in the performance of any riminate against any employe or other persons on account of race, color,

that the Commonwealth, upon receipt of satisfactory evidence of such ‘urn this copy at once if you will not accept this advertisement under the terms

st be included on Parts 1,2 & 3. Return original and two copies (signed 1 must be notarized. Part 4 is yours.

3f printed lines published.

011(1 COST FUNCTION O8J AMOUNT

I/ a&o9eic?

Ic’t’

JAL NO. OF PRINTED LINES COST PER LINE TOTAL AMOUNT

ios

GRANDTOTAL-8”-

.,

NOTARY PUBLIC

(71?) 737-9495 o yhouse@state.pa.ts TOO

users maY contact the AT&T

RelaY Service at (800)

6545984 to discuss NOW DEP

con best accommodate their

needs.

My commission expires

*This affidnvk must be made by the Owner, Publisi

..:IwII1 P.SQIUQfl G ifotaijes
• 

--.—. -: •7’•?J ‘1 —4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         108,233
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                       169
<INVENTORY>                                        705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               115,214
<PP&E>                                         105,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 240,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,204
<BONDS>                                        129,794
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           47,268
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           449
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,980
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   240,226
<SALES>                                          1,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,638
<CGS>                                            5,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,191
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (6,259)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,517)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (34,517)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,485)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,002)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.86)


</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 615

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans

Affairs to furnish outpatient medical services for any disability of a

former prisoner of war.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24 (legislative day, MARCH 23), 1995

Mr. AKAKA (for himself and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish outpatient medical

services for any disability of a former prisoner of war.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF FORMER PRISONERS OF WAR

4 TO RECEIVE OUTPATIENT MEDICAL SERV5 ICES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS

6 AFFAIRS.

7 Section 1712(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code,

8 is amended—
2

•S 615 IS

1 (1) by striking out ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub2 paragraph (C);

3 (2) by striking out the period at the end of sub4 paragraph (D) and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘; and’’;

5 and

6 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph:

8 ‘‘(E) to any former prisoner of war for any

9 disability.’’.

Æ
# ~ WyaTech

LARAMIE CAMPUS 4373 N. 3rd Street Laramie, WY 82072 td (307) 742·3776 toll-free 1(8oo) 521-7158

www.wyotech.com July 5, 2012 Michael Martin Transportation Industry Analyst Office ofAviation Analysis U.S. Department ofTransportation 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20590 RE: USDOT Essential Air Service Bids for Laramie, Wyoming Dear Mr. Martin: Iam very excited to support the application of SkyWest Airlines to provide Essential Air Service to the Laramie Regional Airport with the possibility of being ableto fly in and out of Laramie, once again. The service currently provided by Great Lakes Airlines has .forced travelers to commute to Denver International Airport dueto the consistent unreliability offlights or the limited scheduling options of flights with connections. Each year, the City of Laramie is missing outon hundreds offlights dueto the continuing decline in services being provided by Great Lakes Airlines. With the hundreds offlights WyoTech, ourstudents and visitors take each year, we feel that anotherservice is the best option toincrease travel to and from the Laramie Regional Airport. Your consideration is this matterwould be greatly appreciated by the Laramie community.

Cc: Laramie Regional Airport Board**~** Membtrofthe Corinthian Colleges, Inc. illf Global Network
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

In connection with the accompanying quarterly report of Whittier EnergyCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006,(the “Report”), I, Bryce W. Rhodes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certify that to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 15, 2006 | */s/ Bryce W. Rhodes*    | * * |
|---------------------|--------------------------|----------|
|                | Bryce  W. Rhodes         |
|                | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 10.79

Mandalay Resort Group Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
AMENDMENT NO. 3
April 15, 2005

WHEREAS, MANDALAY RESORT GROUP, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), maintains the Mandalay Resort Group Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "Plan"); and

WHEREAS,
the Company desires to incorporate into the plan document certain amendments made to the Plan by action of the Board of Directors taken at a meeting that occurred on
June 15, 2004; and

WHEREAS,
the Company desires to make certain amendments to the Plan in order to ensure that the Plan complies with all applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the "Code"), including the provisions applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation plans under Code Section 409A added to the Code by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004; and

WHEREAS,
pursuant to the provisions of Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of the Plan, the Company is authorized to amend the Plan.

NOW,
THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof (or as otherwise specified hereinafter), the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.     Effective
as of June 15, 2004, a new Section 2.5(v) (relating to the definition of a "Change of Control") is hereby added at the end of
Section 2.5 of the Plan, to read:



2.     Effective
as of June 15, 2004, a new sentence (relating to the exclusion of certain bonus payments from the definition of "Compensation") is hereby added to the
end of Section 2.8 of the Plan, to read:



3.     Effective
as of June 15, 2004, a new Section 5.2(d) (relating to the waiver of the Plan's forfeiture for competition provisions in certain circumstances) is
hereby added to the end of Section 5.2 of the Plan, to read:



---





4.     Effective
as of June 15, 2004, a new Section 6.6(c) is hereby added at the end of Section 6.6 of the Plan (relating to certain adjustments with
respect to Section 280G of the Code), to read:



5.     A
new Section 6.7 (relating to certain distributions) is hereby added to Section 6 of the Plan, to read:



6.     A
new Section 6.8 (relating to compliance with Code Section 409A) is hereby added to Section 6 of the Plan, to read:



2

---





7.     New
Section 9.1.1 is hereby added to Section 9 of the Plan, to read:



3

---





8.     In
all other respects the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.

4

---



Exhibit A

Schedule of Illinois and Detroit Participants

5

---



QuickLinks