alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SEC RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 Company
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company
and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure
that material information
relating to the Company,
including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those
entities, particularly during
the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of
the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report
our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by
this annual report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this annual report
any change in the Companys
internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during
the period covered by this
annual report that has
materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal
control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Companys auditors and the Audit Committee of the
Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Companys
ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves
management or other employees
who have a significant role in
the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1235 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1235

  To provide a Federal regulatory moratorium, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2011

  Mr. Carter introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide a Federal regulatory moratorium, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Regulation Moratorium Act of 2011''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL REGULATORY MORATORIUM.

    Except as provided in section 3, no department or agency of the 
United States shall put into force any rule until January 31, 2013.

SEC. 3. EXCEPTIONS TO MORATORIUM.

    Section 2 does not apply in the case of a rule excepted by section 
553(a) from the requirements of that section or for which notice of 
proposed rulemaking is not required under subsection 553(b).
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-2145

___________________________

Charles Swift

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Walmart

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________

 Submitted: October 3, 2016

Filed: October 6, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Charles Swift appeals the district court’s preservice dismissal without 1

prejudice of his pro se diversity complaint. The court dismissed the complaint after

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1

of Nebraska.
Swift failed to comply with the court’s order to provide evidence of damages

sufficient to invoke diversity jurisdiction. Having carefully considered the record,

and given the without-prejudice nature ofthe dismissal, we conclude the district court

did not abuse its discretion in dismissing without prejudice. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02502]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12321]

Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Picture Worlds: Greek, Maya 
and Moche Pottery'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Picture Worlds: Greek, Maya and 
Moche Pottery'' at the J. Paul Getty Museum at the Getty Villa, Pacific 
Palisades, California; the Michael C. Carlos Museum, Emory University, 
Atlanta, Georgia; and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that 
their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: [email protected]). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-02502 Filed 2-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001108373
<NAME>                        essentialsystems.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Nov-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,740
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,740
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       600
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,740
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,760)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,760)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

V ASHTI E. MADDEN

,

Appellant,

v.

E L PASO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL

DISTRICT

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00 169

- C V

Appeal from the

34 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2012

- DVC

- 01483 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until March 27 , 2014

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELL EE ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Steven L. Hughes , the Appell ee ’s attorney, prepare

the Appell ee ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 27 , 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 th day of February , 20 1 4

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez , JJ.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

|Pursuant to Section 906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
        1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned
        officers of Surge Technologies Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
        does hereby certify that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|1.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|2.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

|Dated: | March 13, 2003 | By: | /s/     Gordon McPhedran                       
|------ | -------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------
|       |                |     | Gordon McPhedran, Chief Executive
      Officer
|       |                |     |                                                
|Dated: | March 13, 2003 | By: | /s/     Thom Eggerston                         
|       |                |     | Thom Eggerston, Chief Financial Officer        

---
<PAGE>
                                       1



                        ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT


     This Assignment of Purchase Agreement  ("Assignment") is made as of January
15,  1998,  by and between  TRINET  CORPORATE  REALTY  TRUST,  INC.,  a Maryland
corporation  ("Assignor"),  and TRINET ESSENTIAL  FACILITIES X, INC., a Maryland
corporation ("Assignee"), with reference to the following facts:

     A. ICG HOLDINGS,  INC., a Colorado corporation  ("Seller"),  as seller, and
Assignor,  as buyer,  entered into that certain Purchase Agreement,  dated as of
December 9, 1997 (the "Purchase  Agreement"),  covering the Property (as defined
in the Purchase Agreement).

     B. Assignee is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Assignor.

     C. The parties  desire to enter into this  Assignment to assign  Assignor's
rights under the Purchase Agreement to Assignee.

     THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

     1. Assignment and Assumption.

          (a) Assignor hereby assigns and transfers to Assignee all right, title
     and interest of Assignor in, to and under the Purchase Agreement.

          (b) Assignee hereby accepts the foregoing assignment,  and assumes and
     agrees to perform  all of the  covenants  and  agreements  in the  Purchase
     Agreement to be performed by the Buyer thereunder.

     2. Further  Assurances.  Assignor and Assignee  agree to execute such other
documents and perform such other acts as may be  reasonably  necessary or proper
and usual to effect this Assignment.

     3.  Governing  Law. This  Assignment  shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado.

     4. Successors and Assigns.  This Assignment shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of Assignor  and  Assignee  and their  respective  personal
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns.

<PAGE>
                                       2


     5.  Counterparts.  This  Assignment may be signed in multiple  counterparts
which, when signed by all parties, shall constitute a binding agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  Assignor and Assignee have executed this Assignment as
of the date first hereinabove written.


ASSIGNOR:                     TRINET CORPORATE REALTY TRUST, INC.,
                              a Maryland corporation


                              By  /s/ Gary P. Lyon
                                 ---------------------------------
                                   Gary P. Lyon

                                 Its  Executive Vice President


ASSIGNEE:                     TRINET ESSENTIAL FACILITIES X, INC.,
                              a Maryland corporation


                              By  /s/ Gary P. Lyon
                                 ---------------------------------
                                   Gary P. Lyon

                                 Its  Executive Vice President
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

815 

KA 09-00176 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM ALLEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (SUSAN C.

AZZARELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a resentence of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E.

Fahey, J.), rendered November 21, 2008. Defendant was resentenced

upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second

degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and false

personation. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of,

inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree

(Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and now appeals from the resentence,

contending that his waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and

thus does not encompass his present challenge to the severity of the

sentence. Although defendant validly waived the right to appeal at

the plea proceeding (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256),

that waiver does not preclude him from challenging the sentence

imposed upon resentencing (see People v Gray, 32 AD3d 1052, 1053, lv

denied 7 NY3d 902; People v Tausinger, 21 AD3d 1181, 1183; see

generally People v Dexter, 71 AD3d 1504, 1504-1505, lv denied 14 NY3d

887; People v Rodriguez, 259 AD2d 1040). Nevertheless, on the merits,

we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: July 6, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40784

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE OMAR ACOSTA-ALVAREZ, also known as

Antony Omar Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CR-135-1

--------------------

February 15, 2001

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Omar Acosta-Alvarez (Acosta) appeals his conviction and

77-month sentence following his plea of guilty to illegal reentry

after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Acosta argues

that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased

sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the

offense that should have been charged in the indictment. He

acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve
No. 00-40784

-2-

the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule

Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 120 S. Ct. at 2361-62 & n.15. 

Acosta’s argument is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S.

at 235. Accordingly, Acosta’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Exelis Systems Corporation ) ) Under Contract No. W91RUS-06-C-0029 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 58919, 58920

Steven M. Masiello, Esq. Kelly P. Garehime, Esq.

McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP Denver, CO E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeals are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 23 June 2014

# ~~~ MARKN. STEMPLE Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANos. 58919, 58920, Appeals ofExelis Systems Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David A. Yost, Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Raybor Management Inc.; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a)    all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  October 15, 2003
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Arizona Instrument Corporation's
Registration  Statement No. 33-73614 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos.
33-2712,  33-2713  and 2-99078 on Form S-8 of our report  dated March 13,  1996,
except  for Note C, as to which the date is March 26,  1996,  appearing  in this
Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of Arizona  Instrument  Corporation  for the year
ended December 31, 1995.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 26, 1996