9284 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / Notices 

Representative (USTR) staff members 

selected to serve on the Senior 

Executive Service (SES) and Senior 

Level (SL) Performance Review Board 

(PRB). This notice supersedes all 

previous PRB membership notices. 

DATES: The staff members in this notice 

will begin serving as PRB members on 

February 9, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cassie Ender, Human Capital Specialist, 

Office of Human Capital and Services, at 

(202) 881–7782 or Cassie.L.Ender@

ustr.eop.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is 

required (see 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)) to 

establish a PRB to review and make 

recommendations to the U.S. Trade 

Representative for final approval of the 

performance rating, performance-based 

pay adjustment, and performance award 

for each incumbent SES and SL. The 

following staff members have been 

selected to serve on USTR’s PRB: 

Chair: Rachel Howe, Assistant U.S. Trade 

Representative for ICTIME. 

Member: Daniel Lee, Assistant U.S. Trade 

Representative for Innovation and 

Intellectual Property. 

Member: Daniel Watson, Assistant U.S. 

Trade Representative for Western 

Hemisphere Affairs. 

Member: Julie Callahan, Assistant U.S. 

Trade Representative for Agricultural Affairs. 

Member: Juan Millan, Assistant U.S. Trade 

Representative for Monitoring and 

Investment. 

Fred Ames, 

Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for 

Administration, Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02714 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3390–F4–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Noise Compatibility Program for Dane 

County Regional Airport/Truax Field, 

Dane County, Wisconsin 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration, DOT. 

ACTION: Acceptance of Dane County 

Regional Airport/Truax Field noise 

exposure map. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) announces its 

determination that the noise exposure 

map submitted by Dane County for Dane 

County Regional Airport/Truax Field is 

in compliance with applicable statutory 

and regulatory requirements. 

DATES: The effective date of the FAA’s 

determination on the noise exposure 

map is December 21, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Bobb Beauchamp, 2300 Devon Avenue, 

Suite 312, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018. 

847–294–7364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA 

determined the noise exposure map 

submitted by Dane County for Dane 

County Regional Airport/Truax Field, is 

in compliance with applicable statutory 

and regulatory requirements, effective 

December 21, 2023. Under title 49, 

United States Code (U.S.C.) section 

47503, an airport operator may submit 

to the FAA, noise exposure maps 

depicting non-compatible uses as of the 

date such map is submitted, a 

description of estimated aircraft 

operations during a forecast period that 

is at least five years in the future and 

how those operations will affect the 

map. A noise exposure map must be 

prepared in accordance with title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

150, the regulations promulgated 

pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 47502 and 

developed in consultation with public 

agencies and planning authorities in the 

area surrounding the airport, State and 

Federal agencies, interested and affected 

parties in the local community, and 

aeronautical users of the airport. In 

addition, an airport operator that 

submitted a noise exposure map, which 

the FAA determined is compliant with 

statutory and regulatory requirements, 

may submit a noise compatibility 

program for FAA approval that sets 

forth measures the operator has taken or 

proposes to take to reduce existing noncompatible uses and prevent the 

introduction of additional noncompatible uses. 

The FAA completed its review of the 

noise exposure map and supporting 

documentation submitted by Dane 

County and determined the noise 

exposure map and accompanying 

documentation are in compliance with 

applicable requirements. The 

documentation that constitutes the 

Noise Exposure Map includes: Table 

ES–1–1 Existing (2022) and Forecast 

(2027) Land Use Compatibility; Table 

ES–1–2 Existing (2022) and Forecast 

(2027) Noise Sensitive Sites; Figure ES– 

1 Existing Condition (2022) Noise 

Exposure Map; Figure ES–2 Future 

Conditions (2027) Noise Exposure Map; 

Figure 3–1 Existing Land Use; Table 5– 

1 Runway Specifications; Table 5–2 

Operation Counts by Tower Category; 

Table 5–3 Modeled 2022 Annual 

Itinerant Operations; Table 5–4 Modeled 

2022 Annual Local Operations; Table 5– 

5 Modeled 2027 Annual Itinerant 

Operations; Table 5–6 Modeled 2027 

Annual Local Operations; Figure 5–2 

AEDT Runway Use; Figure 5–3 NMAP 

Runway Use; Table 5–7 Runway 

Utilization for Fixed-Wing Aircraft; 

Table 5–8 AEDT-Modeled Itinerant Jet 

Model Track Utilization; Table 5–9 

Military NMAP-Modeled Itinerant 

Fixed-Wing Model Track Utilization; 

Table 5–10 AEDT-Modeled Itinerant 

Non-Jet Fixed-Wing Model Track 

Utilization; Table 5–11 AEDT-Modeled 

Local Fixed-Wing Model Track 

Utilization; Table 5–12 NMAP-Modeled 

Local Military Model Track Utilization; 

Table 5–13 AEDT-Modeled Itinerant 

Civilian Helicopter Model Track 

Utilization; Table 5–14 NMAP-Modeled 

Military Itinerant Helicopter Model 

Track Utilization; Figure 5–4 AEDTModeled Fixed-Wing Arrival Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5–5 AEDT-Modeled 

Fixed-Wing Departure Flight Tracks; 

Figure 5–6 AEDT-Modeled Fixed-Wing 

Circuit Flight Tracks; Figure 5–7 NMAPModeled Fixed-Wing Arrival Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5–8 NMAP-Modeled 

Fixed-Wing Departure Flight Tracks; 

Figure 5–9 NMAP-Modeled Fixed-Wing 

Circuit Flight Tracks; Figure 5–10 

AEDT-Modeled Helicopter Arrival 

Flight Tracks; Figure 5–11 AEDTModeled Helicopter Departure Flight 

Tracks; Figure 5–12 NMAP-Modeled 

Helicopter Arrival Flight Tracks; Figure 

5–13 NMAP-Modeled Helicopter 

Departure Flight Tracks; Figure 5–14 

NMAP-Modeled Helicopter Circuit 

Flight Tracks; Table 5–15 Modeled 

Engine Runup Activity for the 

Wisconsin Air and Army National 

Guard; Figure 5–15 Modeled Engine 

Runup Locations for the Wisconsin Air 

and Army National Guard; Figure 6–1 

Existing Condition (2022) Noise 

Exposure Map; Figure 6–2 Future 

Condition (2027) Noise Exposure Map; 

Figure 6–3 Comparison of Existing 

Condition (2022) and Future Condition 

(2027) Noise Exposure Map; Table 6–1 

Existing 2022 and Forecast 2027 Land 

Use Compatibility; Table 6–2 Existing 

2022 and Forecast 2027 Noise Sensitive 

Sites; Figure 6–4 Comparison of Existing 

Condition (2022) and Future Condition 

(2027) Enlarged Insets of Figure 6–3 

required by 14 CFR 150.101 and 49 

U.S.C 47503 and 47506. This 

determination is effective on December 

21, 2023. FAA’s determination on an 

airport’s noise exposure map is limited 

to a finding that the noise exposure map 

was developed in accordance with the 

49 U.S.C 47503 and 47506 and 

procedures contained in 14 CFR part 

150, appendix A. FAA’s acceptance of 

an NEM does not constitute approval of 

the applicant’s data, information or 

plans, or a commitment to approve a 

noise compatibility program or to fund 

the implementation of that program. If 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / Notices 9285 

questions arise concerning the precise 

relationship of specific properties 

within noise exposure contours 

depicted on a noise exposure map, it 

should be noted that the FAA is not 

involved in any way in determining the 

relative locations of specific properties 

with regard to the depicted noise 

contours or in interpreting the noise 

exposure maps to resolve questions 

concerning, for example, which 

properties should be covered by the 

provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47506. These 

functions are inseparable from the 

ultimate land use control and planning 

responsibilities of local government. 

These local responsibilities are not 

changed in any way under 14 CFR part 

150 or through FAA review and 

acceptance of a noise exposure map. 

Therefore, the responsibility for the 

detailed overlaying of noise exposure 

contours onto the map depicting 

properties on the surface rests 

exclusively with the airport operator 

that submitted a noise exposure map or 

with those public and planning agencies 

with which consultation is required 

under 49 U.S.C. 47503. The FAA relied 

on the certification by the airport 

operator, under of 14 CFR 150.21 that 

the required consultations and 

opportunity for public review has been 

accomplished during the development 

of the noise exposure maps. Copies of 

the noise exposure map and supporting 

documentation and the FAA’s 

evaluation of the noise exposure maps 

are available for examination at the 

following locations: Federal Aviation 

Administration Chicago Airports 

District Office, 2300 Devon Avenue, 

Suite 312, Des Plaines, IL 60018, and 

Dane County Regional Airport/Truax 

Field and Dane County at 4000 

International Lane, Madison, WI 53704. 

Questions may be directed to the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

notice. 

Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois, on February 

5, 2024. 

Debra L Bartell, 

Manager, Chicago Airports District Office, 

FAA Great Lakes Region. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02660 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

[Docket No. FHWA–2024–0010] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Notice of Request for 

Reinstatement of a Previously 

Approved Information Collection 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of request for 

reinstatement of a previously approved 

information collection. 

SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public 

comments about our intention to request 

the Office of Management and Budget’s 

(OMB) approval for renewal of an 

existing information collection that is 

summarized below under 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We are 

required to publish this notice in the 

Federal Register by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Please submit comments by 

April 9, 2024. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by DOT Docket ID Number 

0010 by any of the following methods: 

Website: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received go to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal: Go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Fax: 1–202–493–2251. 

Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. 

Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Wendy McAbee, 202–366–5658, Office 

of Bridges and Structures, Federal 

Highway Administration, Department of 

Transportation, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: National Tunnel Inspection 

Program. 

OMB Control No.: 2125–0640. 

Background: This collection is 

necessary to meet legislative 

requirements of 23 U.S.C. 144 and 23 

CFR part 650, subpart E—National 

Tunnel Inspection Standards which 

require States, Federal agencies, and 

Tribal governments to: (1) perform, and 

report inventory and element data from, 

initial, routine, damage, in-depth, and 

special inspections as appropriate for all 

highway tunnels on public roads, and 

(2) report critical findings on highway 

tunnels. The critical findings 

information is periodically provided to 

the FHWA. The tunnel information is 

used for multiple purposes, including: 

(1) the determination of the condition of 

the Nation’s tunnels; (2) for various 

reports to Congress on Tunnel Safety; 

(3) for conducting oversight of the 

National Tunnel Inspection Program at 

the State, Federal agency, and Tribal 

level; and (4) for strategic national 

defense needs. 

Respondents: 42 States, the District of 

Columbia, Puerto Rico and 4 Federal 

agencies. The number of inspection per 

respondent varies in accordance with 

the National Tunnel Inspection 

Standards. 

Estimated Average Burden per 

Response: The estimated average burden 

for each tunnel inspection is 40 hours. 

The estimated average burden for 

reporting critical findings is 40 hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: The annual burden hours 

associated with this renewal is 15,880 

hours. This estimated figure is based on 

annual instances for tunnel inspections 

multiplied by 40 hours (13,960 hours); 

plus 40 hours for follow up on critical 

findings multiplied by 48 respondents 

(1,920 hours) for a combined annual 

burden of 15,880 hours. 

Public Comments Invited: You are 

asked to comment on any aspect of this 

information collection, including: (1) 

Whether the proposed collection is 

necessary for the FHWA’s performance; 

(2) the accuracy of the estimated 

burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to 

enhance the quality, usefulness, and 

clarity of the collected information; and 

(4) ways that the burden could be 

minimized, including the use of 

electronic technology, without reducing 

the quality of the collected information. 

The agency will summarize and/or 

include your comments in the request 

for OMB’s clearance of this information 

collection. 

Authority: The Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as 

amended; and 49 CFR 1.48. 

Issued on: February 6, 2024. 

Jazmyne Lewis, 

Information Collection Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02667 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1