alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PEDIANET.COM, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT MARCH 31, 2000 AND THE THREE MONTHS
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         108,886
<SECURITIES>                                     3,750
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,587
<PP&E>                                         408,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                 270,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 372,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          203,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                         5,280
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   372,733
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,900
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (83,782)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (83,782)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 19, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130252 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PAMELA MACOR, Personal Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Gary Macor, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130252 COA: 264076 Genesee CC: 04-080340-NH ROBERT F. KOWALSKI, M.D., Defendant-Appellee,

and

McLAREN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendant-Appellant,

and

MARTA Z. BONKOWSKI, M.D., Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a sti pulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of th is application for le ave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISM ISSED with prejudice and without costs.

l1016 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 19, 2007

Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We hereby consent to the use of our report, which contains an explanatory
paragraph with respect to the substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern, dated August 14, 1998, except Notes 10 and 17 which
are dated September 30, 1998, accompanying the consolidated financial statements
of HealthWatch, Inc. as of June 30, 1998 and 1997, included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and to the incorporation by reference of the
aforementioned financial statements in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
for the 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 1987,
Stock Option Plan of 1989 and Stock Option Plan of 1993, Registration Statement
nos. 33-36833, 33-22729, 33-36832 and 33-75470, respectively, Registration
Statements on Form S-8 for the 1995 Stock Option Plan and 1995 Stock Grant and
Salary Deferral Plan Registration Statement nos. 033-65151 and 333-35297 and S-3
Registration Statements for Selling Shareholders nos. 33-88032, 333-19393,
333-21929 and 333-26913.



SILVERMAN OLSON THORVILSON & KAUFMANN LTD
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
Minneapolis, Minnesota

October 14, 1998
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jose Juan Juarez, Appellant

No. 06-22-00060-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 402nd District Court of 

Wood County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 24,070-

2019). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the trial court’s order denying the motion for post-conviction DNA testing.

We note that the appellant, Jose Juan Juarez, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 9, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
- 492 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

302 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. SAVAGE

Cite as 302 Neb. 492

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. 

Courtney J. Savage, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed March 15, 2019. No. S-17-1166.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: Susan

I. Strong, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Darik J. Von Loh, of Hernandez Frantz, Von Loh, appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Austin N. Relph 

for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the 

appellant, Courtney J. Savage, concerning our opinion in State 

v. Savage, 301 Neb. 873, 920 N.W.2d 692 (2018). We overrule 

the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows:

In the subsection “(a) Authentication,” after the fourth 

sentence of the fourth paragraph, we insert the following 

language:

As for Savage’s contention that the State did not properly 

authenticate messages sent to him by others, we again 

disagree. The State was required only to introduce testimony sufficient to establish that the evidence was what 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

05/03/2019 02:07 AM CDT
- 493 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

302 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. SAVAGE

Cite as 302 Neb. 492

the State claimed it to be. The State did not claim that 

messages sent by others were anything more than messages sent to Savage’s cell phone. See State v. Elseman, 

287 Neb. 134, 841 N.W.2d 225 (2014).

Savage, 301 Neb. at 885, 920 N.W.2d at 703.

In subsection “(b) Hearsay,” following the second to the last 

paragraph, we insert the following paragraph:

We also reject Savage’s argument that text messages 

sent to his cell phone by unidentified individuals contained 

inadmissible hearsay. Hearsay is “a statement, other than 

one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or 

hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-801(3) (Reissue 2016). 

Messages sent to Savage’s cell phone were not offered 

for the truth of the matters asserted. They were offered to 

prove that the statements were made.

Savage, 301 Neb. at 887, 920 N.W.2d at 704.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modified.

 Motion for rehearing overruled.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE**

**SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, David A. Yost, Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Raybor Management Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 11, 2004
Charge Questions

No Mas 003 Completed Report 

Study Title: Field Efficacy Test of a PMD and Lemongrass Oil-Based Repellent ‘No Mas’ 

Against Mosquitoes

1. Is the CLBR completed study No Mas 003 sufficiently sound, from a scientific 

perspective, to be used to estimate the duration of complete protection against mosquitoes 

provided by the tested repellent? 

2. Does available information support a determination that the studies were conducted in 

substantial compliance with 40 CFR Part 26, subparts K and L?
Exhibit 4.9


 


English
summary of Principal Terms of an Addendum to the Lease Agreement (dated March 22, 2015), entered on February 27, 2017, by and between
Mintz K. Construction Company Ltd. (the “Landlord”), as landlord, and Galmed Research and Development Ltd. (the
“GRD”), as tenant (the “Addendum”). 


 


The Addendum


 


		·	Premises covered by the Addendum: Approximately 90 square meters for a space adjacent to
the original premises covered under the Lease Agreement (the “Additional Premises”). The Additional Premises
together with the original premises shall add up to a total of 446 square meters (the “Total Premises”).



 


		·	Term of Lease: Notwithstanding the Lease period under the Lease Agreement, the term of the
Total Premises shall be for a period of 25 months from February 20, 2017 until March 21, 2019 (the “New Lease Term”),
provided however that GRD shall have an option to extend the New Lease Term in accordance with the terms of the Lease Agreement
(the “Option”).



 


		·	Fees: In addition to the fees paid under the Lease Agreement, the Company shall pay additional
monthly rental fees in the amount of NIS 5,900 plus VAT for the Additional Premises (the “Additional Rental Fee)”,
which shall increase to NIS 6,600 during the Option period, if exercised. The Additional Rental Fee is linked to the Israeli consumer
price index of March 2015 and shall be paid on a quarterly basis together with the original premises rental fees.



 


		·	Expenses: GRD shall bear all customary expenses associated with the use of the Total Premises,
including, but not limited to, Total Premises’ management fees and municipal tax.



 


		·	Security: GRD shall provide the Landlord with (i) an autonomous bank guarantee of NIS
26,000; provided however that during the Option Period, if exercised, the autonomous bank guarantee shall increase to NIS 29,000.



 


		·	Sublease: GRD shall have the right to transfer or assign its rights in the Premises to a
third party, provided that in such event the Landlord's rights under the Lease and the Addendum thereof shall remain.
NAVAJO TIMES 

NEWSPAPER OF THE NAVAJO PEOPLE 

PO Box 310 Window Rock, AZ 86515 1[h1fh 

(928) S7t-tt3o Fax: (928) 871-1159 \'UhJ' .---------------'Hitl~~. ()~/}j Bill To ' c:..\'~ ~--------------~~~ ~ U.S. Environmental Protection Agency -,... 

Region 9 

75.Hawthorne Street, (WTR-5) 

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

Attn: Lisa Beckham 

P.O. Number Terms 

PrePay 

Rep 

Quantity Item Code Description 

18 Legal Display (Wi ... Four Corners Power Plant- Announcement of Additional 

Public Hearing on the Proposed Clean Air Act Prevention 

Published on August 07, 2014 

I Affidavit 

We appreciate your promr 

1131. 

Affidavit fcc 

Paid VISA $228.80 (L02) (08/05/14) 

Navajo Nation Tax 

tlava.jo TiNes 

HwY 264 and Route 12 

!oJitfDOl,J ROCK, AZ 86515 

928-871-1130 

TERHIIIAL IO.: 70396851 

l£RCHAIII M: 555577538500 

UISA 

U**lU*Uli3744 EXP :WU KEYED CliP 

NAIL ORDER SALE 

BATCH: 000717 HIU: 000012 

Au9 OS, 14 14:26 

RRII: 421721202426 AUTH: 088909 

AUS: 2 

U-COOE: H 

TRAtl SEQ H: 005902 

CUSTOI£R IIUitlER: L02 

P. 0. IIUiflER: L02 

IRAIISACTIOII IO: 304217771912015 

ZIP ~TCH 

!ase contact 928-871-1 130 or 

Invoice·. 

Date Invoice# 

8. 7'2014 Ll4-1211 

Price Each Amount .. 12.00 216.00T 

2.00 2.00 

5.00% 10.80 

Total $228.80 

Balance Due $0.00 

• I
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00852

- CV

IN RE ANDERSON COLUM BIA CO., INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

On November 13 , 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief pe nding final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus

. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further

consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real part ies in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than November 29, 2018

. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator ’ s request for temporary relief is GRANTED. All proceedings in trial c a use number 15

- 03

- 31056

- MCV , styled Jerold Givens, et al. v. Salatiel Polanco, et al. , pending in the

293rd Judicial District Court

, Maverick County , Texas, are STAYED pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus.

It is so ORDERED on November 13, 2018

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

__________________ ___________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15

- 03

- 31056

- MCV , styled Jerold Givens, et al

. v. Salatiel Polanco, et al.

, pen ding in the 293rd Judicial District Court

, Maverick County, Texas, the Honorable Gloria Saldana presiding.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 
**- 1036** 

HUGH TITO ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
ASHTON B. CARTER, The Honorable, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Logistics Agency) ,
Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv
- 00453

- REP )

Submitted : August 11, 2016 Decided: August 16, 2016

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Hugh Tito, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER C URIAM:
Hugh Tito appeals the district court ’ s order granting

Defendant ’ s motion for summary judgment and dismissing his civil

action alleging age discrimination in a promotion decision and in
setting his compensation while he held a temporary position . We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. * Tito v. Hagel , No. 3:14

- cv
- 00453

- REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 17,

2015) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before th is
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although Defendant may not have complied with Local Rule 7(E), district courts in the Eastern District of Virginia do not view a violation of th at r ule as fatal to a motion for summary judgment. See Hunt v. Calhoun Cnty. Bank, Inc. , 8 F. Supp. 3d 720, 73 1 (E.D. Va. 2014) (“Failure to meet and confer does not automatically result in denial of a motion. Rather, sanctions for failure to meet and confer lie within a district court’s discretion and its inherent power to control its docket.” (citations omitted ))

.
Order issued July fP, 1996

In The

Qlffurt at Appals

Ttftly Ststrtrt of Qkxas ai lallas

No. 05-92-00176-CR

JAMES EDWARD SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

ORDER

O I2-

On November 28, 1994, appellant's retained counsel filed a motion to withdraw as

counsel and an Anders brief asserting the appeal was frivolous and without merit. See

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The procedural safeguards of Anders and its

progeny apply to counsel appointed to represent an indigent appellant. They do not apply

to retained attorneys. SeeJeffery v. State, 903 S.W.2d 776, 779 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1995, no

pet.). Accordingly, we STRIKE the November 28, 1994 motion to withdraw and brief filed

on appellant's behalf. Further, we STRIKE the State's response filed on December 28,

1994.

Appellant's retained counsel, Ross Teter, is ORDERED to file within ten days of the
date of this order either (i) a motion to withdraw the notice of appeal signed by counsel and

appellant as required by rule 59(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, (ii) a motion

to withdraw as counsel that complies with rule 7 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

or (iii) a brief raising meritorious grounds of error. If Ross Teter fails to file either a

motion to withdraw the appeal, a motion to withdraw as counsel, or a brief raising

meritorious grounds within the time allowed, this Court may order him to appear to show

cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for failing to obey this order.

Ross Teter shall file the motion to withdraw the appeal, the motion to withdraw as

counsel, or the brief raising meritorious grounds with the Clerk ofthe Court of Appeals,

Fifth District ofTexas, George L. Allen Sr. Courts Building, 600 Commerce Street, Dallas,

Texas 75202-4658.

We ORDER theClerk ofthis Court to send Ross Teter a copy ofthis order by both

registered mail, restricted delivery to addressee only, return-receipt requested, and by firstclass mail.

FRANCES MALONEY

JUSTICE

-2-
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 522

To provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions

of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities

associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for

certain transmission facilities associated with the El

Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITED EXEMPTION.

4 (a) EXEMPTION.—Part I of the Federal Power Act,

5 and the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory

6 Commission under such part I, shall not apply to the

7 transmission line facilities associated with the El Vado
2

S 522 IS

1 Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 5226–002)

2 which are described in subsection (b).

3 (b) FACILITIES COVERED BY EXEMPTION.—The fa4 cilities to which the exemption under subsection (a) ap5 plies are those transmission facilities located near the Rio

6 Chama, a tributary of the Rio Grande, in Rio Arriba

7 County, New Mexico, referred to as the El Vado trans8 mission line, a three phase 12-mile long 69 kV power line

9 installed within a 50-foot wide right-of-way in Rio Arriba

10 County, New Mexico, originating at the El Vado Project’s

11 switchyard and connecting to the Spills 69 kV Switching

12 Station operated by the Northern Arriba Electric Coopera13 tive, Inc.

Æ