alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHENMING LIU, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-71414 

Agency No. A089-882-127 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 11, 2019**

Before: WALLACE, FARRIS, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Zhenming Liu, a native and citizen of People’s Republic of China, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his 

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 13 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-71414 

the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility 

determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 

1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination 

based on inconsistencies between Liu’s testimony, asylum application, and record 

evidence as to when Liu began working at the dye factory and how long he 

received unemployment benefits after he was laid off. See Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 

1048 (adverse credibility determination reasonable under “the totality of 

circumstances”). Liu’s explanations do not compel a contrary conclusion. See 

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1245 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, in the absence of credible 

testimony in this case, Liu’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail. See 

Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).

Liu’s CAT claim also fails because it rests on the same testimony that the 

agency found not credible, and Liu points to no other evidence showing that it is 

more likely than not he will be tortured if returned to China. See id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10378 

Summary Calendar

 

BILLY WAYNE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ANN RICHARDS, also known as Governor of Texas;

ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:93-CV-359

- - - - - - - - - -

May 21, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Texas prisoner Billy Wayne Williams, No. 365918, has moved

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to appeal the

district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint. The

Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) applies to this appeal. See

Strickland v. Rankin County Correctional Facility, 105 F.3d 972,

973-76 (5th Cir. 1997). Williams has complied with the
No. 96-10378

- 2 -

certification requirements of the PLRA and his motion for leave

to proceed IFP is GRANTED. 

IT IS ORDERED that Williams authorize the appropriate prison

authorities to withdraw the initial partial filing fee of $7.85

from his trust fund account in accordance with the procedures

required by the prison and to forward payment of the initial

partial filing fee to the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for

the Northern District of Texas. 

Thereafter, Williams shall make periodic payments to the

clerk of the same district court until the full appellate filing

fee of $105 is paid. 

To accomplish these periodic payments, Williams is directed

to execute all consents and forms required by the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, to

authorize the withdrawals from his trust fund account.

In accordance with its standard procedure, the prison having

custody of Williams is directed to periodically forward payments

from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each

time the amount in his account exceeds $10. 

 Williams contends that the district court erred in

dismissing his complaint. We have carefully reviewed the record

and the briefs and AFFIRM for the reasons adopted by the district

court. See Williams v. Richards, No. 2:93-CV-0359 (N.D. Tex.

Mar. 11, 1996 and March 29, 1996). 

 IFP GRANTED; INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE ASSESSED; JUDGMENT
No. 96-10378

- 3 -

AFFIRMED.
^

z ^, -= J ~ ____^ = OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

RICK PERRY GOVERNOR
January 27, 2014

The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Ariel Rios Building, Room 300 Washington, D.C. 20460 RE: Petition for Waiver Under Clean Air Act Section 211(o)(7)(A) Dear Administrator McCarthy: In 2008, 1 requested a partial waiver of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) mandate for ethanol derived from grain, citing the negative economic affects the mandate has on Texas producers, consumers and commuters. In 2012, I wrote in support of a full or partial waiver request by fellow governors and other leaders when, with more than 55 percent of the country's pastureland damaged by drought, the ethanol mandate threatened to compromise crop yield and overall production. Today, I am writing in support of the recent petition for a partial waiver of the 2014 applicable volumes of RFS by the American Petroleum Institute and American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers. Today, more than 50 percent of the country is experiencing abnormally dry to exceptional drought conditions, a trend the U.S, drought monitor expects to persist over the next 12 months. While the impacts of drought will continue to threaten U.S. and Texas farrriers and producers, this year, we are faced with another challenge created by RFS. While renewable fuel requirements are increasing annually, gasoline demand in the United States is steadily declining. This dynamic has created the E10 blendwall — the point at which more renewable fuel is required to be blended than can be safely consumed in the United States, due to fundamental constraints imposed by fueling infrastructure and problems of gasoline engine incompatibility with increased ethanol blends. The mandate currently.xequires U.S: gasoline suppliers'tb de ` monstrate compliance with' RFS through Renewable Identification Numbers (RTNs); The nurriber of RINs available f s tied directly to the level of consumption of renewable fuels in U.S. transportation fuels. As RFS

PosT OFFIcE Box 12428 AusTBa, TExns 78711 (512)463-2000 (VoicE)/Dw 7-1-1 FOR RELAY SEEvIcEs

VIstT WWW.TEJLISONIINE.COM THE OFF1cIAL WEB s[TE OF THE sTi1TE oF TEXAsThe Honorable Gina McCarthy

January 27, 2014 Page 2
mandates exceed the ability of the underlying fuel supply and vehicle and infrastructure compatibility to accommodate additional amounts of renewable fuels, there will be a shortage of RINs available for compliance, thereby limiting supplies of gasoline and diesel for U.S. consumption. Such a shortage will result in severe economic harm to consumers and the overall economy if not corrected now. Your agency has rightfully acknowledged the blendwall and exercised its authority in the ^ 1'r proposed 2014 RFS volumes ruly waiving the volumes to just below 10 percent ethanol. I strongly encourage you to stay the course and remain steadfast in your resolve to avoid the blendwall and unnecessary economic harm as you finalize the 2014 RFS volumes. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

/ tr l^-^ Rick Perry Governor 

# 7m,
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1301 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the Federal 

medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the 

Medicaid Program to 75 percent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2011 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase 

the Federal medical assistance percentage for the District of Columbia under the Medicaid Program to 75 

percent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Medicaid Reimbursement Act of 2011’’. 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1301 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING THE MEDICAID FEDERAL MEDICAL AS2 SISTANCE PERCENTAGE FOR THE DISTRICT 

3 OF COLUMBIA TO 75 PERCENT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(b)(3) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)(3)) is amended by strik6 ing ‘‘70 percent’’ and inserting ‘‘75 percent’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) shall apply to calendar quarters beginning 

9 on or after October 1, 2011. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKD9S0YB1PROD with BILLS
| Section 1   | Issuance      of Common Stock. |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------|

----

| Section 2   | Vesting      of Shares; Termination of Service;Forfeiture. |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Section 3   | Escrow      of Shares. |
|----------------------------|------------------------|

----

| Section 4   | Restriction      on Transfer; InvestmentRepresentation. |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Section 5   | Miscellaneous. |
|----------------------------|----------------|

----

----

|  __________________________________ |   |   |  __________________________________ |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|  Date:                              |   |   |  Name:                              |
|                                     |   |   |                                     |

----
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant


to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Waytronx, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form
10-Q of the quarter ended March 31, 2010, I hereby certify solely for the
purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:





(1)
              The
      quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
      15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
 The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company




Waytronx,
Inc.





By:
              /s/ William J. Clough
              
              Dated
      this 16th day of August 2010.William
      J. Clough,Chief
      Executive Officer/President
**Exhibit 21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES**

|  | 1. | Langer                Canada Inc., a New Brunswick (Canada)                corporation. |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Langer                Distribution Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly known                as GoodFoot Acquisition Co.). |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Langer                (UK) Limited, an English limited liability company (formerly known                as                Langer Biomechanics Group (UK)                Limited). |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 4. | Langer                Professional Services, Inc., a Delaware                corporation. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | Regal                Medical, Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly known as Regal Acquisition                Co.) (January 8, 2007). |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 6. | Silipos, Inc.,                a Delaware corporation. |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 7. | Twincraft,                Inc., a Vermont corporation (January 23,                2007). |
|--|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1871

THESIS PAINTING, INC.,

Petitioner,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Respondent.

No. 16-2031

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner,

v.

THESIS PAINTING, INC.,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review and Cross-application for Enforcement of an Order of the 

National Labor Relations Board. (05-CA-172905)

Submitted: March 16, 2017 Decided: April 7, 2017
2

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, THACKER, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

No. 16-1871 petition for review denied; No. 16-2031 cross-application for enforcement

granted by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Baskin, LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. 

Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, Jennifer Abruzzo, Deputy General Counsel, 

John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General 

Counsel, Usha Dheenan, Molly Sykes, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Thesis Painting, Inc. (Thesis) petitions for review of 

a National Labor Relations Board (Board) order granting summary judgment on its 

complaint alleging Thesis violated the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 151-

169 (2012) (NLRA), when it refused to recognize and bargain with the International 

Union of Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO, District Council 51 (Union) after the 

Board certified the Union as the representative of Thesis’ employees. The Board’s order 

directed Thesis to bargain with the Union upon request. The Board has cross-petitioned, 

asking this court to enforce its order. 

We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Board’s factual findings, and 

find that the Board’s legal interpretations of the NLRA are rational and consistent with 

the Act. See 29 U.S.C. § 160(e) (2012); NLRB v. Air Contact Transp. Inc., 403 F.3d 206, 

210 (4th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we deny Thesis’ petition and grant the Board’s crosspetition for enforcement. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

16-1871 PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED; 

16-2031 CROSS-APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT GRANTED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 482 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 84
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 482

                          [Report No. 104-62]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel EMERALD 
                                 AYES.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 2 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

 Mr. Hollings (for himself and Mr. Thurmond) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

                             April 18, 1995

    Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of April 6 
  (legislative day, April 5), 1995, by Mr. Pressler, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel EMERALD 
                                 AYES.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), the 
Act of June 19, 1886 (46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 and 12107 
of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may 
issue a certificate of documentation with a coastwise endorsement for 
the vessel EMERALD AYES, United States official number 986099.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 84

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 482

                          [Report No. 104-62]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel EMERALD 
                                 AYES.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 18, 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), dated as of March 20, 2017, is entered into by and between POZEN Inc. (the “Company”), and Adrian Adams (the “Executive”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated May 31, 2015 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which the Executive is currently employed by Company; and

 

WHEREAS, Section 15 of the Agreement provides that it may be amended or modified by a written instrument signed by the parties to the Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and obligations contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, the parties, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein, agree to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth below.

 

1.                                      By adding the following to the end of Section 3.2 of the Agreement:

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, Executive has elected not to be eligible to receive an annual cash incentive award under the Company Annual Incentive Bonus Plan with respect to 2017 (payable in 2018); provided that for purposes of determining the severance payable to Executive under Section 5.2 or 5.5, and for all other purposes, the Annual Cash Bonus payable in 2018 with respect to 2017 shall be deemed to be the target Annual Cash Bonus.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement on the day first above written.

 

	
POZEN INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Eric L. Trachtenberg
    	
 
    
	
Its:
    	
Secretary
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
EXECUTIVE
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Adrian Adams
    	
 
    
	
Adrian Adams
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40159

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Salvador Flores-Campos, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:20-CR-301-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Salvador 

Flores-Campos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flores-Campos has not filed a 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 7, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40159 Document: 00516003515 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2021
No. 21-40159

2

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40159 Document: 00516003515 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/07/2021
Exhibit 10.17


 


AGREEMENT


Party A: Wee San Chuan, Francis





Party B: China Teletech Holding,
Inc.


 


1.       Both
parties agreed that Party A shall purchase 100% equity of China Teletech Ltd. And Global Telecom Ltd. owned by Party B.


2.       The
consideration for this equity transfer is USD2000. Party A shall pay if off within 10 days after both parties sign the agreement.


3.       The
Agreement shall become effective upon signing of both parties.


4.       This
Agreement is made in two copies with each party holding one copy.


 



    	 		 



    	 



    




 


(The remainder of this page is intentionally
left blank)


 


Party A (Signature): Wee San Chuan, Francis


Party B (Chop): China Teletech Holding,
Inc.


The representative (Signature):


Date: January 1, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,726,951
<SECURITIES>                                12,403,757
<RECEIVABLES>                                  349,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,985,222
<PP&E>                                       2,200,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,625,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,690,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 37,882,289
<COMMON>                                         2,026
<OTHER-SE>                                 (22,127,408)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,625,043
<SALES>                                      1,175,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,175,464
<CGS>                                          281,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,347,276
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (19,596,254)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (19,596,254)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                  (17,108,813)
<NET-INCOME>                               (36,705,067)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (27.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (27.40)


</TABLE>