alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 129 ) ll-E-8 9 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07

AM Sheet 129 of 264P. 2

HKK - r-y s i u t 7:0 9 P
. 8 2 04/06/9 8 18:4 2 ©1919941023 4 PE 9 RT P N C ® 002-'00 3


### A 945 2 

## H.-E- 

# 8 1

From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t

Greg LaFla

m an d Melani e Proctor, Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) Novembe r6,199 6 an

d Apri l 6,199 8 Mr . Charles DeBusk , Plan tEnginee r Appalachian Plastics , Inc. , Glad e Spring , V A 

## L0C T ,22,123 3
EP A AI R DOCKE T Telephon e Number : (540)429-258 1 Fa x Number : (540 ) 429-263 1
Contac tSummary : Appalachian Plastic s use s mostl y corrosion-resistant(polyeste ran d vinylester ) resin s i n filamen twindin g an

d ope n moldin g operations . Th e resin s contai n 4 0 t o 4 5 percen tstyrene ; n o additiona l monome ri s added whe n mixin g th e resi n matrix . Resi n i s mixe d i n 1 0 mixin g vats , whic h ar e approximately 3 fee ti n diameteran d 3 fee thigh . Th e vats hav e a cove rmad e i n tw o halves : a fixe d hal f

an d hal f tha tswivel s outfrom th e va

ts o ma tingredients can b e added . Th e mixe rshaf

ti s mounted throug

h bearing s i n th e fixed half-cover . Prio rt o mixing , th e cove ri s swivelle d close d (metal-to-metal contact) , s o ther e i s onl y a small crac

k (i f any ) i n th e cover enclosure . Clarificatio n base d o n Apri l 6,199 8 contac trepor twit h Melani e Procto r(PES ) Ms . Proctorexplaine d tha tth e purpos e o f

thi s phon e cal l wa s t o determin e i f th e facility' s mixer s ar e activel y vented . Mr

. DeBus k explaine d tha

tn o activ e ventilatio n o f

th e mixin g vessel s occur s durin

g th e mixin g process .

INFORMATIO N I S ACCURAT E 

# (A(A.D.lf
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00325-CR

Roy Edward Caples, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR95-207, HONORABLE FRED CLARK, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Roy Edward Caples was adjudged guilty after he pleaded guilty to

driving while intoxicated, felony offense. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a), .09(b) (West

Supp. 2001). The court assessed punishment at imprisonment for three years, as called for in a

plea bargain agreement.

Appellant represents himself on appeal, as he did at trial. Appellant did not file

a brief. We have examined the record before us and find no fundamental error that should be

considered in the interest of justice.
2

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed: March 15, 2001

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 23.2




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-3 (File Nos.  33-35140,  33-77396,  333-43809,  333-83215,
333-34550,  333-33436,  333-72226,  333-100315),  Form S-8 (File Nos.  33-30595,
33-52574,  33-57004,  33-63321,  333-00431,   333-04679,  333-27673,  333-48454,
333-58384,  333-59718,  333-75304) and Form S-1 (File Nos. 333-68759, 333-67947)
of Cytogen Corporation of our report dated February 14, 2003, except for Notes 1
and 3, as to  which  the date is  March  28,  2003,  relating  to the  financial
statements of PSMA  Development  Company LLC,  which appears in this Form 10-K/A
(Amendment No. 2).



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York
September 19, 2003
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALEX MAZARIEGO-GOMEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-50079

D.C. No. 3:14-cr-02294-LAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 13, 2016** 

Before: FARRIS, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. 

Alex Mazariego-Gomez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

APR 18 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Mazariego-Gomez contends that the district court erred in applying a 16-

level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because his prior

conviction under California Penal Code § 211 is not a crime of violence. This

claim is foreclosed. See United States v. Becerril-Lopez, 541 F.3d 881, 893 & n.10

(9th Cir. 2008) (a conviction for robbery under California Penal Code § 211 is a

categorical crime of violence). Contrary to Mazariego-Gomez’s assertion,

Descamps v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2276 (2013), which concerns the modified

categorical approach, does not allow us to disregard Becerril-Lopez. See Miller v.

Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 893 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (three-judge panel is bound

by circuit precedent unless that precedent is “clearly irreconcilable” with

intervening higher authority).

Because the district court properly applied a 16-level enhancement under

U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii), we need not reach Mazariego-Gomez’s contention

that his prior conviction is not an aggravated felony for purposes of an 8-level

enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-50079
_____________

No. 95-2732NE

_____________

Leroy Bear Robe; *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

*

Merilyn R. Bear Robe, *

*

Plaintiff, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of Nebraska.

*

Alliance City Schools; * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant-Appellee, *

*

Mark Monroe, *

*

Defendant. *

_____________

Submitted: March 21, 1996

 Filed: March 26, 1996

_____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Bear Robe appeals the district court's grant of summary

judgment in favor of Alliance City Schools in Bear Robe's employment

discrimination action. Having carefully reviewed the record and the

parties' briefs, we conclude the district court's judgment for Alliance

City Schools was correct, and an extended discussion is not warranted.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 653 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 653

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                  coastwise trade for the vessel AURA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 30 (legislative day, March 27), 1995

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                  coastwise trade for the vessel AURA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with the 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel AURA (United States official number 1027807).
                                 <all>
```
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 5, 2009      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       |                      |                                                                 |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | APPLETON      PAPERS INC. |
|                       |                      |                                                                 |
| Dated:      August 7, 2009 |                      | /s/      Thomas J. Ferree                                       |
|                       | Name:                     | Thomas      J. Ferree                                                |
|                       | Title:                    | Vice      President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 5, 2009      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                               |                                                |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                | PAPERWEIGHT      DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                                |                               |                                                |
| Dated:  May      13, 2009 |                               |                                                |
|                                | Name:                              | Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                                | Title:                             | Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6637

JAMES ANTHONY BUTLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK,

the Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-2466-6-21AK)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 2, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Anthony Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Butler

v. State of South Carolina, No. CA-94-2466-6-21AK (D.S.C. Apr. 3,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the annual  report of Syms Corp (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended  February 26, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Antone F. Moreira,
Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  to the best of my knowledge,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.




                                                        /s/Antone F. Moreira
                                                        Antone F. Moreira
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        Syms Corp
                                                        May 23, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
II

Calendar No. 51

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 510

[Report No. 104–28]

To extend the authorization for certain programs under the Native American

Programs Act of 1974, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, and Mr. CAMPBELL) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

APRIL 5, 1995

Reported by Mr. MCCAIN, with an amendment

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To extend the authorization for certain programs under the

Native American Programs Act of 1974, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 510 RS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR NA2 TIVE AMERICAN SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DE3 VELOPMENT STRATEGIES GRANT PROGRAM.

4 Section 816 of the Native American Programs Act

5 of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d) is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘for fiscal

7 years 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995.’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘for each of fiscal years 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,

9 and 1999.’’; and

10 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘and 1996,’’

11 and inserting ‘‘1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999,’’.

12 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN APPROPRIA13 TIONS UNDER THE NATIVE AMERICAN PRO14 GRAMS ACT OF 1974.

15 (a) SECTION 816.—Section 816 of the Native Amer16 ican Programs Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d) is amended—

17 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘for fiscal years

18 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995.’’ and inserting ‘‘for each

19 of fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999.’’;

20 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘for each of the

21 fiscal years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996,’’ and

22 inserting ‘‘for each of fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998,

23 and 1999,’’; and

24 (3) in subsection (e), by striking ‘‘$2,000,000 for

25 fiscal year 1993 and such sums as may be necessary

26 for fiscal years 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.’’ and in-
3

•S 510 RS

1 serting ‘‘such sums as may be necessary for each of

2 fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999.’’.

3 (b) SECTION 803A(f)(1).—Section 803A(f)(1) of such

4 Act (42 U.S.C. 2991b–1(f)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘for

5 each of the fiscal years 1992, 1993, and 1994, $1,000,000’’

6 and inserting ‘‘such sums as may be necessary for each of

7 fiscal years 1996 through 1999,’’.
Calendar No. 51

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 510

[Report No. 104–28]

A BILL

To extend the authorization for certain programs

1974, and for other purposes.under the Native American Programs Act of

APRIL 5, 1995

Reported with an amendment
Douglas B. Bennett, Petitioner,
v. Mark Nooth, Respondent. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED AUG 102010 Clerk 

### us Df 

### CourtS torthe

## ~f~~~:t oBtanckr/uPfCY 

### oumbla 

# 10 1344

Petitioner, proceeding

### pro se, has submitted an application for a writ of

### habeas corpus along with an application to proceed 

### informapauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed 

### informapauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner is an Oregon state prisoner in Ontario, Oregon, challenging a conviction entered by a county court in Portland, Oregon. Pet. at 2. Federal court review ofstate convictions is available under 28 U.S.c. § 2254 only after the exhaustion ofavailable state remedies. 

### See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(I). Thereafter, "an application for a writ ofhabeas corpus [] made by a person in custody under thejudgment and sentence ofa State court ... may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and each ofsuch district courts shall have concurrentjurisdiction to entertain the application." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Petitioner has no recourse here. A separate Order ofdismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
United States Distn t Judge Date: August 4-,2010
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134089(26) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134089 

 COA: 272761 

Kent CC: 03-001780-FC 

JAMES ROBERT MCQUEEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 29, 

2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously. 

d0114 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 22, 2008 

Clerk
### rReg ul ato r y Eva lu at i o n 

# 2 o ts - **~Jc,.** Docket No. FAA- :Lo{ { ,... **~** 

## S 

# )Cj Directorate

I dentifier:

() 

# f-AD ffyou make changes

t o th e values in the table below. you must ensure th e total s updat e accordingly

. 

# rr they do not , click (o r Tab ) into and then out of th e c han ged cell. Est im a t e d C o s t s: Action

Costs per Pr o d u c t (e.g .. aircraft, engine, (e.g .. Inspection,

propeller. appliance) Work-hours Labor Part s Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S
. Fleet Do n ot includ e on- condi tion costs her e access. testing

, (@S85

/ h parts)
R eg i s t e r e d and close-up) our)

Pr o du c t s 

### Life reduction

0.0 $12,213


### 650

I

- The knO\\ n number 

### of product

s in compliance:



### 0 Total Cos t s 

### of compliance for 

### U .S. Ocet: 57.938, 4 50 Costs CO \ ered under warrant\ (if'knmm)



## s O n -Co n d i tion Costs:

### rAction

W o rk-hour

s Labor cost Parts Cost Cos t per Product (e.g .. In s pection,

( i ncludl."! access. (@$85

/ hour) replacement)

te s ting
, and close- up) Special considerations for Econom

i c Ana
l ysis rU1e this field to explain anything in the £.\limated Costs tahle that 1ras assu m ed or might11ot he ob1·ious. This .field can al\0 he used to explain '''mTallly cos ts): 

### 2.5o/o reduction in lite x 

### $488517 

### disk cost = $ 1 2,213

### Executive Order 12866: 

### Could the AD 

### be considered

a "sig nificant regulator
y action"? 

# G YES* 

## D NO 

### [gl *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policie
s 

### and Proc e dures

: 

### Is the AD 

### s i gnificant? 

# G

YES* 

## D NO 

### [gl *Explana tion: R e gulator y Flexibilit
y Act: 

### Will the AD 

### have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. 

# G

YES 

## D NO 

### [gl Explanation: In trastate Aviation in A la s ka: 

### This AD could affect intra state aviation in Alaska.

I s it appropr

i ate to include spcc
i fi e 

### requirement

s for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation mi g ht be the on l y mode of transportation?


# 0 YES* 

# D NO 

### [gl *Explanation: