alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
UNDER SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14



| |  | In connection with the Quarterly Report of TBX Resources, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Tim Burroughs, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m or 780(d); and                
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 11th day of July 2003.

By: /s/ Tim Burroughs

Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 28, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 304


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on March 27, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the
evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-215493) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the“Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael P. Gray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

Dated: October 26, 2004
EPA Reg istration No. 74530

- 11

Volume No. 3, Part 2.Pages 13 through 1 5 contain Commercial/Financial Information and are not included in this

copy.
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 127887 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

BLAINE C. KING, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff, Justices 

v SC: 127887 

 COA: 247451 

Kent CC: 01-012556-CK 

WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

and 

GENERAL CASUALTY INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
EXHIBIT
32.2








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATIONS





In
connection with the Annual Report of Security Capital Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Connie
Hawkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:           March
13, 2009








/s/ Connie
Hawkins


Connie
Hawkins


Chief
Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Company's financial statements as of December 27, 1996 and for the year ended 
December 27, 1996 and is referenced to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                           0001013355
<NAME>                          Trusted Information Systems
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-27-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,838,787  
<SECURITIES>                                   39,127,069 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,977,953  
<ALLOWANCES>                                   174,592    
<INVENTORY>                                    0          
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               50,975,530 
<PP&E>                                         8,360,716  
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,665,192  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 58,003,593 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,865,230  
<BONDS>                                        2,424,355  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0          
<PREFERRED>                                    0          
<COMMON>                                       114,897    
<OTHER-SE>                                     47,551,746 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   58,003,593 
<SALES>                                        26,370,081 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,370,081 
<CGS>                                          12,193,453 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  12,193,453 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,778,443 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0          
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             415,243    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,560,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,396,510)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,164,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0          
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0          
<CHANGES>                                      0          
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,164,203)          
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.25)          
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.25)          
        



</TABLE>
#### Bernard J. HORSTMAN, Appellant, v. Lorene NEWMAN, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 22, 1956.

F. L. Pearl, Louisville, for appellant.

I. R. Gumer, Louisville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court, Common Pleas Branch, Fifth Division, Hon. Lawrence S. Grauman, Judge.

This action was brought by appellee, Lorene Newman to recover from appellant, Bernard J. Horstman, $250 for two months’ rent on an oral lease in which the term was by the month. Appellant vacated the premises owing one month’s rent of $125 and as he failed to give the thirty day written notice required by KRS 383.140 that he would terminate the lease, the landlord charged him another month’s rent. The tenant pleaded the landlord failed to repair the furnace, and counter-claimed for $700 damages by reason of the landlord’s alleged invasion of his right of privacy by coming to the house on Sunday morning and demanding the rent. At the conclusion of all the evidence the trial judge in an exhaustive and learned opinion directed a verdict for the appellee landlord for $250 for two months’ rent.

We have examined the pleadings and proof and read the authorities cited by the trial judge and have reached the conclusion that he correctly held under Goodwin v. Beutel, Ky., 256 S.W.2d 532, the tenant must give the statutory notice of his intention to vacate. Also, he is correct in holding under Richmond v. Standard *568Elkhorn Coal, Co., 222 Ky. ISO, 300 S.W. 359, 58 A.L.R. 1423, there is no obligation upon the landlord to repair the premises in absence of a special agreement to do'so when the contract .is made. Furthérmore, we agree with the trial judge there was no invasion of the tenant’s right of privacy by the landlord coming on the premises on Sunday morning and demanding1 the rent then due. Like the trial judge, we find no contrariety in' the evidence on any point which would require a submission of the' case to the jury.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertainingto the NVE Corporation 2000 Stock Option Plan (as amended by the shareholderson July 19, 2001) and the NVE Corporation 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ofour report dated April 21, 2006, with respect to the financial statements ofNVE Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedMarch 31, 2006.

 

 
| /s/ ERNST &  YOUNG LLP |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |
| Minneapolis,  Minnesota    |
| May 18, 2006               |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Greenfield Online, Inc. (the
registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 /s/ Albert Angrisani
EXHIBIT 21

                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

SourceOne  Group,  Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ITEC.

EnStructure,  Inc.,  a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ITEC.

Dealseekers.com,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation,  71.4%  owned  by  ITEC.

EduAdvantage.com,  Inc.,  a California corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary
of  ITEC.

Laser Printer Accessories Corporation, a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned
subsidiary  of  ITEC  (Inactive).

Personal  Computer  Products,  Inc.,  doing  business  as  PCPI  Technologies, a
California  corporation  and  a  wholly-owned  subsidiary  of  ITEC  (Inactive)

Co-Processors,  Inc.,  a California corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ITEC  (Inactive).

NewGen  Imaging  Systems,  Inc.,  a  California  corporation  and a wholly-owned
subsidiary  of  ITEC  (Inactive).

Prima,  Inc.,  a  California  corporation  and a wholly-owned subsidiary of ITEC
(Inactive).

McMican  Corporation,  a California corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ITEC  (Inactive)

Color Solutions, Inc., a California corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ITEC.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS WITH REGARD TO HALIS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

                             TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
                         Certified Public Accountants
                           3340 Peachtree Road, N.E.
                                   Suite 250
                               Atlanta, GA 30326


     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report to the Board of
Directors and Stockholders of Halis, Inc. and Subsidiaries dated April 7, 2000
accompanying the Consolidated Financial Statements of Halis, Inc. as of December
31, 1999 and 1998, included in the June 30, 2000 Form 10-KSB for HealthWatch,
Inc.



/s/ Tauber & Balser, P.C.
-------------------------
TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia
September 28, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 8, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
180 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-176, CP2024-182.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-02534 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony Maurice LYNCH, a/k/a Ant, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-5022.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 18, 2002.

Decided Aug. 21, 2002.

Richard W. Shryock, Jr., R. Mike Mullens *&*Associates, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas E. Johnston, United States Attorney, Sherry L. Muncy, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

*625Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Maurice Lynch appeals his 210 month sentence pursuant to his guilty plea to aiding and abetting crack cocaine distribution, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1994), and distribution of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a) (West 1999 & Supp.2002). After pleading guilty, while released on bond, Lynch committed two criminal offenses in Florida, driving under the influence and petit retail theft, pleading guilty to both crimes. The district court denied Lynch an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility, and sentenced him to 210 months incarceration and three years of supervised release. Lynch appeals.

On appeal, Lynch asserts the district court erred in denying him an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility based on his unrelated criminal conduct. The district court’s determination regarding acceptance of responsibility is factual, and we review it with great deference for clear error. *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 3E1.1, comment, (n.5) (2000); *United States v. Ruhe,*191 F.3d 376, 388 (4th Cir.1999). Lynch’s claim is meritless; his failure to voluntarily withdraw from criminal conduct establishes the district court did not err in denying him an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. USSG § 3E1.1, comment. (n.l(b)).

Accordingly, we affirm Lynch’s sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-242V 

Filed: July 10, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

ANNA ROOF HARRELSON, 

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Mary Lee Briggs, Briggs and Inglese, LLC, Charleston, SC, for petitioner.

Althea Walker Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On February 16, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered on 

September 29, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 25, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner satisfied the criteria set forth in 

 

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This 

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine 

Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the 

disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned 

agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from 

public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management 

and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. 
the Vaccine Injury Table and Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation regarding a 

SIRVA Id. at 5. 

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
Exhibit 99.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Mid-Power Service Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
W. Scott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ James W. Scott
---------------------------
James W. Scott
Chief Executive Officer
October 21, 2002