```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 640 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.640

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
  To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
 resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                         and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition.

                    TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 103. Small bank stabilization projects.
Sec. 104. Small navigation projects.
Sec. 105. Small shoreline protection projects.
Sec. 106. Small snagging and sediment removal project, Mississippi 
          River, Little Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 107. Small projects for improvement of the environment.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Cost sharing for dredged material disposal areas.
Sec. 202. Flood control policy.
Sec. 203. Cost sharing for feasibility studies.
Sec. 204. Restoration of environmental quality.
Sec. 205. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 206. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 207. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 208. Recreation policy and user fees.
Sec. 209. Recovery of costs.
Sec. 210. Cost sharing for environmental projects.
Sec. 211. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
          interests.
Sec. 212. Engineering and environmental innovations of national 
          significance.
Sec. 213. Lease authority.
Sec. 214. Collaborative research and development.
Sec. 215. National dam safety program.
Sec. 216. Hydroelectric power project uprating.
Sec. 217. Dredged material disposal facility partnerships.
Sec. 218. Obstruction removal requirement.
Sec. 219. Small project authorizations.
Sec. 220. Uneconomical cost-sharing requirements.
Sec. 221. Planning assistance to States.
Sec. 222. Corps of Engineers expenses.
Sec. 223. State and Federal agency review period.
Sec. 224. Section 215 reimbursement limitation per project.
Sec. 225. Melaleuca.
Sec. 226. Sediments decontamination technology.
Sec. 227. Shore protection.
Sec. 228. Conditions for project deauthorizations.
Sec. 229. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 230. Benefits to navigation.
Sec. 231. Loss of life prevention.
Sec. 232. Scenic and aesthetic considerations.
Sec. 233. Termination of technical advisory committee.
Sec. 234. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 235. Sense of Congress; requirement regarding notice.
Sec. 236. Technical corrections.
Sec. 237. Hopper dredges.

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Project modifications.
Sec. 302. Mobile Harbor, Alabama.
Sec. 303. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, Arizona.
Sec. 304. White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 305. Channel Islands Harbor, California.
Sec. 306. Lake Elsinore, California.
Sec. 307. Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, San Pedro Bay, California.
Sec. 308. Los Angeles County drainage area, California.
Sec. 309. Prado Dam, California.
Sec. 310. Queensway Bay, California.
Sec. 311. Seven Oaks Dam, California.
Sec. 312. Thames River, Connecticut.
Sec. 313. Canaveral Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 314. Captiva Island, Florida.
Sec. 315. Central and Southern Florida, Canal 51.
Sec. 316. Central and Southern Florida, Canal 111.
Sec. 317. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), Florida.
Sec. 318. Panama City Beaches, Florida.
Sec. 319. Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 320. Chicago Lock and Thomas J. O'Brien Lock, Illinois.
Sec. 321. Kaskaskia River, Illinois.
Sec. 322. Locks and Dam 26, Alton, Illinois and Missouri.
Sec. 323. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 324. Baptiste Collette Bayou, Louisiana.
Sec. 325. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 326. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana.
Sec. 327. Tolchester Channel, Maryland.
Sec. 328. Cross Village Harbor, Michigan.
Sec. 329. Saginaw River, Michigan.
Sec. 330. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan.
Sec. 331. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri.
Sec. 332. Lost Creek, Columbus, Nebraska.
Sec. 333. Passaic River, New Jersey.
Sec. 334. Acequias irrigation system, New Mexico.
Sec. 335. Jones Inlet, New York.
Sec. 336. Buford Trenton Irrigation District, North Dakota.
Sec. 337. Reno Beach-Howards Farm, Ohio.
Sec. 338. Broken Bow Lake, Red River Basin, Oklahoma.
Sec. 339. Wister Lake project, Leflore County, Oklahoma.
Sec. 340. Bonneville Lock and Dam, Columbia River, Oregon and 
          Washington.
Sec. 341. Columbia River dredging, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 342. Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 343. Mussers Dam, Middle Creek, Snyder County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 344. Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 345. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 346. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 347. Allendale Dam, North Providence, Rhode Island.
Sec. 348. Narragansett, Rhode Island.
Sec. 349. Clouter Creek disposal area, Charleston, South Carolina.
Sec. 350. Buffalo Bayou, Texas.
Sec. 351. Dallas floodway extension, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 352. Grundy, Virginia.
Sec. 353. Haysi Lake, Virginia.
Sec. 354. Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 355. Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 356. East Waterway, Washington.
Sec. 357. Bluestone Lake, West Virginia.
Sec. 358. Moorefield, West Virginia.
Sec. 359. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 360. West Virginia trailhead facilities.
Sec. 361. Kickapoo River, Wisconsin.
Sec. 362. Teton County, Wyoming.
Sec. 363. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 364. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 365. Mississippi Delta Region, Louisiana.
Sec. 366. Monongahela River, Pennsylvania.

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Corps capability study, Alaska.
Sec. 402. Red River, Arkansas.
Sec. 403. McDowell Mountain, Arizona.
Sec. 404. Nogales Wash and tributaries, Arizona.
Sec. 405. Garden Grove, California.
Sec. 406. Mugu Lagoon, California.
Sec. 407. Murrieta Creek, Riverside County, California.
Sec. 408. Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat restoration, 
          California.
Sec. 409. Santa Ynez, California.
Sec. 410. Southern California infrastructure.
Sec. 411. Stockton, California.
Sec. 412. Yolo Bypass, Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California.
Sec. 413. West Dade, Florida.
Sec. 414. Savannah River Basin comprehensive water resources study.
Sec. 415. Chain of Rocks Canal, Illinois.
Sec. 416. Quincy, Illinois.
Sec. 417. Springfield, Illinois.
Sec. 418. Beauty Creek watershed, Valparaiso City, Porter County, 
          Indiana.
Sec. 419. Grand Calumet River, Hammond, Indiana.
Sec. 420. Indiana Harbor Canal, East Chicago, Lake County, Indiana.
Sec. 421. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 422. Little Calumet River, Indiana.
Sec. 423. Tippecanoe River watershed, Indiana.
Sec. 424. Calcasieu River, Hackberry, Louisiana.
Sec. 425. Morganza, Louisiana, to Gulf of Mexico.
Sec. 426. Huron River, Michigan.
Sec. 427. City of North Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.
Sec. 428. Lower Las Vegas Wash wetlands, Clark County, Nevada.
Sec. 429. Northern Nevada.
Sec. 430. Saco River, New Hampshire.
Sec. 431. Buffalo River greenway, New York.
Sec. 432. Coeymans, New York.
Sec. 433. New York Bight and Harbor study.
Sec. 434. Port of Newburgh, New York.
Sec. 435. Port of New York-New Jersey navigation study.
Sec. 436. Shinnecock Inlet, New York.
Sec. 437. Chagrin River, Ohio.
Sec. 438. Cuyahoga River, Ohio.
Sec. 439. Columbia Slough, Oregon.
Sec. 440. Charleston, South Carolina.
Sec. 441. Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota.
Sec. 442. Mustang Island, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 443. Prince William County, Virginia.
Sec. 444. Pacific Region.
Sec. 445. Financing of infrastructure needs of small and medium ports.
Sec. 446. Evaluation of beach material.

                    TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Land conveyances.
Sec. 502. Namings.
Sec. 503. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 504. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 505. Corps capability to conserve fish and wildlife.
Sec. 506. Periodic beach nourishment.
Sec. 507. Design and construction assistance.
Sec. 508. Lakes program.
Sec. 509. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 510. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
          program.
Sec. 511. Research and development program to improve salmon survival.
Sec. 512. Columbia River Treaty fishing access.
Sec. 513. Great Lakes confined disposal facilities.
Sec. 514. Great Lakes dredged material testing and evaluation manual.
Sec. 515. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 516. Sediment management.
Sec. 517. Extension of jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission.
Sec. 518. Sense of Congress regarding St. Lawrence Seaway tolls.
Sec. 519. Recreation partnership initiative.
Sec. 520. Field office headquarters facilities.
Sec. 521. Earthquake Preparedness Center of Expertise expansion.
Sec. 522. Jackson County, Alabama.
Sec. 523. Benton and Washington Counties, Arkansas.
Sec. 524. Heber Springs, Arkansas.
Sec. 525. Morgan Point, Arkansas.
Sec. 526. Calaveras County, California.
Sec. 527. Faulkner Island, Connecticut.
Sec. 528. Everglades and South Florida ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 529. Tampa, Florida.
Sec. 530. Watershed management plan for Deep River Basin, Indiana.
Sec. 531. Southern and Eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 532. Coastal wetlands restoration projects, Louisiana.
Sec. 533. Southeast Louisiana.
Sec. 534. Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia.
Sec. 535. Cumberland, Maryland.
Sec. 536. William Jennings Randolph Access Road, Garrett County, 
          Maryland.
Sec. 537. Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 538. Erosion control measures, Smith Island, Maryland.
Sec. 539. Restoration projects for Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West 
          Virginia.
Sec. 540. Control of aquatic plants, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and 
          Virginia and North Carolina.
Sec. 541. Duluth, Minnesota, alternative technology project.
Sec. 542. Lake Superior Center, Minnesota.
Sec. 543. Redwood River basin, Minnesota.
Sec. 544. Coldwater River Watershed, Mississippi.
Sec. 545. Natchez Bluffs, Mississippi.
Sec. 546. Sardis Lake, Mississippi.
Sec. 547. St. Charles County, Missouri, flood protection.
Sec. 548. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 549. Libby Dam, Montana.
Sec. 550. Hackensack Meadowlands area, New Jersey.
Sec. 551. Hudson River habitat restoration, New York.
Sec. 552. New York City Watershed.
Sec. 553. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 554. Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York.
Sec. 555. Dredged material containment facility for Port of New York-New 
          Jersey.
Sec. 556. Queens County, New York.
Sec. 557. Jamestown Dam and Pipestem Dam, North Dakota.
Sec. 558. Northeastern Ohio.
Sec. 559. Ohio River Greenway.
Sec. 560. Grand Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 561. Broad Top region of Pennsylvania.
Sec. 562. Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 563. Hopper dredge McFarland.
Sec. 564. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 565. Seven Points Visitors Center, Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 566. Southeastern Pennsylvania.
Sec. 567. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 568. Wills Creek, Hyndman, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 569. Blackstone River Valley, Rhode Island and Massachusetts.
Sec. 570. Dredged material containment facility for Port of Providence, 
          Rhode Island.
Sec. 571. Quonset Point-Davisville, Rhode Island.
Sec. 572. East Ridge, Tennessee.
Sec. 573. Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
Sec. 574. Tennessee River, Hamilton County, Tennessee.
Sec. 575. Harris County, Texas.
Sec. 576. Neabsco Creek, Virginia.
Sec. 577. Tangier Island, Virginia.
Sec. 578. Pierce County, Washington.
Sec. 579. Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia, flood protection.
Sec. 580. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 581. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 582. Site designation.
Sec. 583. Long Island Sound.
Sec. 584. Water monitoring station.
Sec. 585. Overflow management facility.
Sec. 586. Privatization of infrastructure assets.

 TITLE VI--EXTENSION OF EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY UNDER HARBOR MAINTENANCE 
                               TRUST FUND

Sec. 601. Extension of expenditure authority under Harbor Maintenance 
          Trust Fund.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--Except as provided in this 
subsection, the following projects for water resources development and 
conservation and other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to 
the conditions, described in the respective reports designated in this 
subsection:
        (1) American river watershed, california.--
            (A) In general.--The project for flood damage reduction, 
        American and Sacramento Rivers, California: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers, dated June 27, 1996, at a total cost of 
        $56,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $42,675,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,225,000, consisting of--
                (i) approximately 24 miles of slurry wall in the levees 
            along the lower American River;
                (ii) approximately 12 miles of levee modifications 
            along the east bank of the Sacramento River downstream from 
            the Natomas Cross Canal;
                (iii) 3 telemeter streamflow gauges upstream from the 
            Folsom Reservoir; and
                (iv) modifications to the flood warning system along 
            the lower American River.
            (B) Credit toward non-federal share.--The non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs for expenses that the non-Federal interest incurs 
        for design or construction of any of the features authorized 
        under this paragraph before the date on which Federal funds are 
        made available for construction of the project. The amount of 
        the credit shall be determined by the Secretary.
            (C) Interim operation.--Until such time as a comprehensive 
        flood damage reduction plan for the American River watershed 
        has been implemented, the Secretary of the Interior shall 
        continue to operate the Folsom Dam and Reservoir to the 
        variable 400,000/670,000 acre-feet of flood control storage 
        capacity and shall extend the agreement between the Bureau of 
        Reclamation and the Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency with 
        respect to the watershed.
            (D) Other costs.--The non-Federal interest shall be 
        responsible for--
                (i) all operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, 
            and rehabilitation costs associated with the improvements 
            carried out under this paragraph; and
                (ii) 25 percent of the costs incurred for the variable 
            flood control operation of the Folsom Dam and Reservoir 
            during the 4-year period beginning on the date of the 
            enactment of this Act and 100 percent of such costs 
            thereafter.
        (2) Humboldt harbor and bay, california.--The project for 
    navigation, Humboldt Harbor and Bay, California: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers, dated October 30, 1995, at a total cost of 
    $15,180,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,000,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $5,180,000.
        (3) Marin county shoreline, san rafael, california.--The 
    project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Marin County 
    shoreline, San Rafael, California: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers, dated January 28, 1994, at a total cost of $28,300,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $18,400,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $9,900,000.
        (4) Port of long beach (deepening), california.--The project 
    for navigation, Port of Long Beach (Deepening), California: Report 
    of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 26, 1996, at a total cost of 
    $37,288,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $14,318,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $22,970,000.
        (5) San lorenzo river, california.--The project for flood 
    control, San Lorenzo River, California: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $21,800,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $10,900,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $10,900,000 and habitat restoration, at a total 
    cost of $4,050,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,040,000 
    and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,010,000.
        (6) Santa barbara harbor, california.--The project for 
    navigation, Santa Barbara Harbor, California: Report of the Chief 
    of Engineers, dated April 26, 1994, at a total cost of $5,840,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $4,670,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $1,170,000.
        (7) Santa monica breakwater, california.--The project for 
    hurricane and storm damage reduction, Santa Monica Breakwater, 
    Santa Monica, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
    June 7, 1996, at a total cost of $6,440,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $4,220,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $2,220,000.
        (8) Anacostia river and tributaries, district of columbia and 
    maryland.--The project for environmental restoration, Anacostia 
    River and Tributaries, District of Columbia and Maryland: Report of 
    the Chief of Engineers, dated November 15, 1994, at a total cost of 
    $17,144,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,858,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $4,286,000.
        (9) Atlantic intracoastal waterway, st. johns county, 
    florida.--The project for navigation, Atlantic Intracoastal 
    Waterway, St. Johns County, Florida: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total Federal cost of 
    $15,881,000. Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and 
    rehabilitation shall be a non-Federal responsibility, and the non-
    Federal interest shall assume ownership of the bridge.
        (10) Cedar hammock (wares creek), florida.--The project for 
    flood control, Cedar Hammock (Wares Creek), Manatee County, 
    Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated August 23, 1996, 
    at a total cost of $13,846,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $10,385,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,461,000.
        (11) Lower savannah river basin, georgia and south carolina.--
    The project for environmental restoration, Lower Savannah River 
    Basin, Georgia and South Carolina: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers, dated July 30, 1996, at a total cost of $3,431,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $2,573,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $858,000.
        (12) Lake michigan, illinois.--The project for storm damage 
    reduction and shoreline erosion protection, Lake Michigan, 
    Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana State 
    line: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 14, 1994, at a 
    total cost of $204,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $110,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $94,000,000. The 
    project shall include the breakwater near the South Water 
    Filtration Plant described in the report as a separate element of 
    the project, at a total cost of $11,470,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $7,460,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $4,010,000. The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interest 
    for the Federal share of any costs incurred by the non-Federal 
    interest--
            (A) in reconstructing the revetment structures protecting 
        Solidarity Drive in Chicago, Illinois, if such work is 
        determined by the Secretary to be a component of the project; 
        and
            (B) in constructing the breakwater near the South Water 
        Filtration Plant in Chicago, Illinois.
        (13) Kentucky lock and dam, tennessee river, kentucky.--The 
    project for navigation, Kentucky Lock and Dam, Tennessee River, 
    Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 1, 1992, at 
    a total cost of $393,200,000. The costs of construction of the 
    project are to be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
    general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated 
    from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
        (14) Pond creek, jefferson county, kentucky.--The project for 
    flood control, Pond Creek, Jefferson County, Kentucky: Report of 
    the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 1994, at a total cost of 
    $16,080,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $10,993,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $5,087,000.
        (15) Wolf creek dam and lake cumberland, kentucky.--The project 
    for hydropower, Wolf Creek Dam and Lake Cumberland, Kentucky: 
    Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 1994, at a total 
    cost of $53,763,000, with an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $53,763,000. Funds derived by the Tennessee Valley Authority from 
    its power program and funds derived from any private or public 
    entity designated by the Southeastern Power Administration may be 
    used to pay all or part of the costs of the project.
        (16) Port fourchon, lafourche parish, louisiana.--The project 
    for navigation, Belle Pass and Bayou Lafourche, Louisiana: Report 
    of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 7, 1995, at a total cost of 
    $4,440,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,300,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $2,140,000.
        (17) West bank of the mississippi river, new orleans (east of 
    harvey canal), louisiana.--The project for hurricane damage 
    reduction, West Bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of 
    New Orleans (East of Harvey Canal), Louisiana: Report of the Chief 
    of Engineers, dated May 1, 1995, at a total cost of $126,000,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $82,200,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $43,800,000.
        (18) Blue river basin, kansas city, missouri.--The project for 
    flood control, Blue River Basin, Kansas City, Missouri: Report of 
    the Chief of Engineers, dated September 5, 1996, at a total cost of 
    $17,082,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,043,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $5,039,000.
        (19) Wood river, grand island, nebraska.--The project for flood 
    control, Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers, dated May 3, 1994, at a total cost of $11,800,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $6,040,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $5,760,000.
        (20) Las cruces, new mexico.--The project for flood control, 
    Las Cruces, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
    June 24, 1996, at a total cost of $8,278,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $5,494,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $2,784,000.
        (21) Atlantic coast of long island, new york.--The project for 
    storm damage reduction, Atlantic Coast of Long Island from Jones 
    Inlet to East Rockaway Inlet, Long Beach Island, New York: Report 
    of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 5, 1996, at a total cost of 
    $72,091,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $46,859,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $25,232,000.
        (22) Cape fear--northeast (cape fear) rivers, north carolina.--
    The project for navigation, Cape Fear--Northeast (Cape Fear) 
    Rivers, North Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
    September 9, 1996, at a total cost of $221,735,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $132,936,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $88,799,000.
        (23) Wilmington harbor, cape fear river, north carolina.--The 
    project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor, Cape Fear and Northeast 
    Cape Fear Rivers, North Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
    dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of $23,953,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $15,572,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $8,381,000.
        (24) Duck creek, cincinnati, ohio.--The project for flood 
    control, Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers, dated June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $15,947,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $11,960,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $3,987,000.
        (25) Willamette river temperature control, mckenzie subbasin, 
    oregon.--The project for environmental restoration, Willamette 
    River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers, dated February 1, 1996, at a total Federal cost 
    of $38,000,000.
        (26) Rio grande de arecibo, puerto rico.--The project for flood 
    control, Rio Grande de Arecibo, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers, dated April 5, 1994, at a total cost of $19,951,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $10,557,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $9,394,000.
        (27) Charleston harbor, south carolina.--The project for 
    navigation, Charleston Harbor Deepening and Widening, South 
    Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 18, 1996, at 
    a total cost of $116,639,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $71,940,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $44,699,000.
        (28) Big sioux river and skunk creek, sioux falls, south 
    dakota.--The project for flood control, Big Sioux River and Skunk 
    Creek, Sioux Falls, South Dakota: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
    dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $34,600,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $25,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $8,700,000.
        (29) Gulf intracoastal waterway, aransas national wildlife 
    refuge, texas.--The project for navigation and environmental 
    preservation, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Aransas National Wildlife 
    Refuge, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 28, 
    1996, at a total cost of $18,283,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $18,283,000.
        (30) Houston-galveston navigation channels, texas.--The project 
    for navigation and environmental restoration, Houston-Galveston 
    Navigation Channels, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
    May 9, 1996, at a total cost of $298,334,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $197,237,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $101,097,000, and an average annual cost of $786,000 for future 
    environmental restoration over the 50-year life of the project, 
    with an estimated annual Federal cost of $590,000 and an estimated 
    annual non-Federal cost of $196,000. The removal of pipelines and 
    other obstructions that are necessary for the project shall be 
    accomplished at non-Federal expense. Non-Federal interests shall 
    receive credit toward cash contributions required during 
    construction and subsequent to construction for design and 
    construction management work that is performed by non-Federal 
    interests and that the Secretary determines is necessary to 
    implement the project.
        (31) Marmet lock, kanawha river, west virginia.--The project 
    for navigation, Marmet Lock, Kanawha River, West Virginia: Report 
    of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of 
    $229,581,000. The costs of construction of the project are to be 
    paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the general fund of the 
    Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the Inland 
    Waterways Trust Fund.
    (b) Projects Subject to Report.--The following projects for water 
resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended 
in a final report (or in the case of the project described in paragraph 
(10), a Detailed Project Report) of the Corps of Engineers, if the 
report is completed not later than December 31, 1996:
        (1) Chignik, alaska.--The project for navigation, Chignik, 
    Alaska, at a total cost of $10,365,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $4,282,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,083,000.
        (2) Cook inlet, alaska.--The project for navigation, Cook 
    Inlet, Alaska, at a total cost of $5,700,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $3,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $2,000,000.
        (3) St. paul island harbor, st. paul, alaska.--The project for 
    navigation, St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska, at a total cost of 
    $18,981,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,239,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $6,742,000.
        (4) Norco bluffs, riverside county, california.--The project 
    for bluff stabilization, Norco Bluffs, Riverside County, 
    California, at a total cost of $8,600,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $6,450,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $2,150,000.
        (5) Terminus dam, kaweah river, california.--The project for 
    flood control and water supply, Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, 
    California, at a total cost of $34,500,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $20,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $14,300,000.
        (6) Rehoboth beach and dewey beach, delaware.--The project for 
    storm damage reduction and shoreline protection, Rehoboth Beach and 
    Dewey Beach, Delaware, at a total cost of $9,423,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $6,125,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $3,298,000, and an estimated average annual cost of 
    $282,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
    project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $183,000 and an 
    estimated annual non-Federal cost of $99,000.
        (7) Brevard county, florida.--The project for shoreline 
    protection, Brevard County, Florida, at a total cost of 
    $76,620,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $36,006,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $40,614,000, and an estimated average 
    annual cost of $2,341,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year 
    life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
    $1,109,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $1,232,000.
        (8) Lake worth inlet, florida.--The project for navigation and 
    shoreline protection, Lake Worth Inlet, Palm Beach Harbor, Florida, 
    at a total cost of $3,915,000.
        (9) Miami harbor channel, florida.--The project for navigation, 
    Miami Harbor Channel, Miami, Florida, at a total cost of 
    $3,221,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $1,800,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $1,421,000.
        (10) New harmony, indiana.--The project for streambank erosion 
    protection, Wabash River at New Harmony, Indiana, at a total cost 
    of $2,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,100,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $700,000.
        (11) Westwego to harvey canal, louisiana.--The project for 
    hurricane damage prevention and flood control, West Bank Hurricane 
    Protection (Lake Cataouatche Area), Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, at 
    a total cost of $14,375,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $9,344,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,031,000.
        (12) Chesapeake and delaware canal, maryland and delaware.--The 
    project for navigation and safety improvements, Chesapeake and 
    Delaware Canal, Baltimore Harbor Connecting Channels, Delaware and 
    Maryland, at a total cost of $82,800,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $53,852,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $28,948,000.
        (13) Absecon island, new jersey.--The project for storm damage 
    reduction and shoreline protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg 
    Harbor Inlet, Absecon Island, New Jersey, at a total cost of 
    $52,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $34,000,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $18,000,000.

SEC. 102. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
        (1) South upland, san bernadino county, california.--Project 
    for flood control, South Upland, San Bernadino County, California.
        (2) Birds, lawrence county, illinois.--Project for flood 
    control, Birds, Lawrence County, Illinois.
        (3) Bridgeport, lawrence county, illinois.--Project for flood 
    control, Bridgeport, Lawrence County, Illinois.
        (4) Embarras river, villa grove, illinois.--Project for flood 
    control, Embarras River, Villa Grove, Illinois.
        (5) Frankfort, will county, illinois.--Project for flood 
    control, Frankfort, Will County, Illinois.
        (6) Sumner, lawrence county, illinois.--Project for flood 
    control, Sumner, Lawrence County, Illinois.
        (7) Vermillion river, demonade park, lafayette, louisiana.--
    Project for nonstructural flood control, Vermillion River, Demonade 
    Park, Lafayette, Louisiana. In carrying out the study and the 
    project (if any) under this paragraph, the Secretary shall use 
    relevant information from the Lafayette Parish feasibility study 
    and expedite completion of the study under this paragraph.
        (8) Vermillion river, quail hollow subdivision, lafayette, 
    louisiana.--Project for nonstructural flood control, Vermillion 
    River, Quail Hollow Subdivision, Lafayette, Louisiana. In carrying 
    out the study and the project (if any) under this paragraph, the 
    Secretary shall use relevant information from the Lafayette Parish 
    feasibility study and expedite completion of the study under this 
    paragraph.
        (9) Kawkawlin river, bay county, michigan.--Project for flood 
    control, Kawkawlin River, Bay County, Michigan.
        (10) Whitney drain, arenac county, michigan.--Project for flood 
    control, Whitney Drain, Arenac County, Michigan.
        (11) Festus and crystal city, missouri.--Project for flood 
    control, Festus and Crystal City, Missouri. In carrying out the 
    study and the project (if any) under this paragraph, the Secretary 
    shall use relevant information from the existing reconnaissance 
    study and shall expedite completion of the study under this 
    paragraph.
        (12) Kimmswick, missouri.--Project for flood control, 
    Kimmswick, Missouri. In carrying out the study and the project (if 
    any) under this paragraph, the Secretary shall use relevant 
    information from the existing reconnaissance study and shall 
    expedite completion of the study under this paragraph.
        (13) River des peres, st. louis county, missouri.--Project for 
    flood control, River Des Peres, St. Louis County, Missouri. In 
    carrying out the study and the project (if any), the Secretary 
    shall determine the feasibility of potential flood control 
    measures, consider potential storm water runoff and related 
    improvements, and cooperate with the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer 
    District.
        (14) Malta, montana.--Project for flood control, Malta, 
    Montana.
        (15) Buffalo creek, erie county, new york.--Project for flood 
    control, Buffalo Creek, Erie County, New York.
        (16) Cazenovia creek, erie county, new york.--Project for flood 
    control, Cazenovia Creek, Erie County, New York.
        (17) Cheektowaga, erie county, new york.--Project for flood 
    control, Cheektowaga, Erie County, New York.
        (18) Fulmer creek, village of mohawk, new york.--Project for 
    flood control, Fulmer Creek, village of Mohawk, New York.
        (19) Moyer creek, village of frankfort, new york.--Project for 
    flood control, Moyer Creek, village of Frankfort, New York.
        (20) Sauquoit creek, whitesboro, new york.--Project for flood 
    control, Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, New York.
        (21) Steele creek, village of ilion, new york.--Project for 
    flood control, Steele Creek, village of Ilion, New York.
        (22) Willamette river, oregon.--Project for nonstructural flood 
    control, Willamette River, Oregon, including floodplain and 
    ecosystem restoration.

SEC. 103. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
        (1) St. joseph river, indiana.--Project for bank stabilization, 
    St. Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana, including recreation and 
    pedestrian access features.
        (2) Allegheny river at oil city, pennsylvania.--Project for 
    bank stabilization to address erosion problems affecting the 
    pipeline crossing the Allegheny River at Oil City, Pennsylvania, 
    including measures to address erosion affecting the pipeline in the 
    bed of the Allegheny River and its adjacent banks.
        (3) Cumberland river, nashville, tennessee.--Project for bank 
    stabilization, Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.

SEC. 104. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
        (1) Akutan, alaska.--Project for navigation, Akutan, Alaska, 
    consisting of a bulkhead and a wave barrier, including application 
    of innovative technology involving use of a permeable breakwater.
        (2) Illinois and michigan canal, illinois.--Project for 
    navigation, Illinois and Michigan Canal, Illinois, including marina 
    development at Lock 14.
        (3) Grand marais harbor breakwater, michigan.--Project for 
    navigation, Grand Marais Harbor breakwater, Michigan.
        (4) Duluth, minnesota.--Project for navigation, Duluth, 
    Minnesota.
        (5) Taconite, minnesota.--Project for navigation, Taconite, 
    Minnesota.
        (6) Two harbors, minnesota.--Project for navigation, Two 
    Harbors, Minnesota.
        (7) Caruthersville harbor, pemiscot county, missouri.--Project 
    for navigation, Caruthersville Harbor, Pemiscot County, Missouri, 
    including enlargement of the existing harbor and bank stabilization 
    measures.
        (8) New madrid county harbor, missouri.--Project for 
    navigation, New Madrid County Harbor, Missouri, including 
    enlargement of the existing harbor and bank stabilization measures.
        (9) Brooklyn, new york.--Project for navigation, Brooklyn, New 
    York, including restoration of the pier and related navigation 
    support structures, at the Sixty-Ninth Street Pier.
        (10) Buffalo inner harbor, buffalo, new york.--Project for 
    navigation, Buffalo Inner Harbor, Buffalo, New York, including 
    enlargement of the existing harbor and bank stabilization measures.
        (11) Glenn cove creek, new york.--Project for navigation, Glenn 
    Cove Creek, New York, including bulkheading.
        (12) Union ship canal, buffalo and lackawanna, new york.--
    Project for navigation, Union Ship Canal, Buffalo and Lackawanna, 
    New York.

SEC. 105. SMALL SHORELINE PROTECTION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects, and if the Secretary determines that the project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g; 
60 Stat. 1056):
        (1) Fort pierce, florida.--Project for 1 mile of additional 
    shoreline protection, Fort Pierce, Florida.
        (2) Sylvan beach breakwater, verona, oneida county, new york.--
    Project for shoreline protection, Sylvan Beach breakwater, Verona, 
    Oneida County, New York.

SEC. 106. SMALL SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL PROJECT, MISSISSIPPI 
              RIVER, LITTLE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for clearing, 
snagging, and sediment removal, East Bank of the Mississippi River, 
Little Falls, Minnesota, including removal of sediment from culverts. 
The study shall include a determination of the adequacy of culverts to 
maintain flows through the channel. If the Secretary determines that 
the project is feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project under 
section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, 
repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a; 59 
Stat. 23).

SEC. 107. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 1135(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a)):
        (1) Pine flat dam, california.--Project for fish and wildlife 
    habitat restoration, Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California, 
    including construction of a turbine bypass.
        (2) Upper truckee river, el dorado county, california.--Project 
    for environmental restoration, Upper Truckee River, El Dorado 
    County, California, including measures for restoration of degraded 
    wetlands and wildlife enhancement.
        (3) Whittier narrows dam, california.--Project for 
    environmental restoration and remediation of contaminated water 
    sources, Whittier Narrows Dam, California.
        (4) Lower amazon creek, oregon.--Project for environmental 
    restoration, Lower Amazon Creek, Oregon, consisting of 
    environmental restoration measures relating to the flood reduction 
    measures constructed by the Corps of Engineers and the related 
    flood reduction measures constructed by the Natural Resources 
    Conservation Service.
        (5) Ashley creek, utah.--Project for fish and wildlife 
    restoration, Ashley Creek near Vernal, Utah.
        (6) Upper jordan river, salt lake county, utah.--Project for 
    channel restoration and environmental improvement, Upper Jordan 
    River, Salt Lake County, Utah.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. COST SHARING FOR DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL AREAS.

    (a) Construction.--Section 101(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a); 100 Stat. 4082-4083) is 
amended--
        (1) in paragraph (2) by striking the last sentence and 
    inserting the following: ``The value of lands, easements, rights-
    of-way, and relocations provided under paragraph (3) and the costs 
    of relocations borne by the non-Federal interests under paragraph 
    (4) shall be credited toward the payment required under this 
    paragraph.'';
        (2) in paragraph (3)--
            (A) by inserting ``and'' after ``rights-of-way,'';
            (B) by striking ``, and dredged material disposal areas''; 
        and
            (C) by inserting ``, including any lands, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations (other than utility relocations 
        accomplished under paragraph (4)) that are necessary for 
        dredged material disposal facilities'' before the period at the 
        end of such paragraph; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(5) Dredged material disposal facilities for project 
    construction.--In this subsection, the term `general navigation 
    features' includes constructed land-based and aquatic dredged 
    material disposal facilities that are necessary for the disposal of 
    dredged material required for project construction and for which a 
    contract for construction has not been awarded on or before the 
    date of the enactment of this paragraph.''.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance.--Section 101(b) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2211(b); 100 Stat. 4083) is amended--
        (1) by inserting ``(1) In general.--'' before ``The Federal'';
        (2) by indenting and moving paragraph (1) (as designated by 
    paragraph (1) of this subsection) 2 ems to the right;
        (3) by striking ``pursuant to this Act'' and inserting ``by the 
    Secretary pursuant to this Act or any other law approved after the 
    date of the enactment of this Act''; and
        (4) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Dredged material disposal facilities.--The Federal share 
    of the cost of constructing land-based and aquatic dredged material 
    disposal facilities that are necessary for the disposal of dredged 
    material required for the operation and maintenance of a project 
    and for which a contract for construction has not been awarded on 
    or before the date of the enactment of this paragraph shall be 
    determined in accordance with subsection (a). The Federal share of 
    operating and maintaining such facilities shall be determined in 
    accordance with paragraph (1).''.
    (c) Agreement.--Section 101(e)(1) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
2211(e)(1); 100 Stat. 4083) is amended by striking ``and to provide 
dredged material disposal areas and perform'' and inserting ``including 
those necessary for dredged material disposal facilities, and 
perform''.
    (d) Consideration of Funding Requirements and Equitable 
Apportionment.--Section 101 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2211; 100 Stat. 
4082-4084) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Consideration of Funding Requirements and Equitable 
Apportionment.--The Secretary shall ensure, to the extent practicable, 
that--
        ``(1) funding requirements for operation and maintenance 
    dredging of commercial navigation harbors are considered before 
    Federal funds are obligated for payment of the Federal share of 
    costs associated with the construction of dredged material disposal 
    facilities in accordance with subsections (a) and (b);
        ``(2) funds expended for such construction are apportioned 
    equitably in accordance with regional needs; and
        ``(3) use of a dredged material disposal facility designed, 
    constructed, managed, or operated by a private entity is not 
    precluded if, consistent with economic and environmental 
    considerations, the facility is the least-cost alternative.''.
    (e) Eligible Operations and Maintenance Defined.--Section 214(2) of 
such Act (33 U.S.C. 2241; 100 Stat. 4108) is amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (A)--
            (A) by inserting ``Federal'' after ``means all'';
            (B) by inserting ``(i)'' after ``including''; and
            (C) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``; (ii) the construction of dredged material 
        disposal facilities that are necessary for the operation and 
        maintenance of any harbor or inland harbor; (iii) dredging and 
        disposing of contaminated sediments that are in or that affect 
        the maintenance of Federal navigation channels; (iv) mitigating 
        for impacts resulting from Federal navigation operation and 
        maintenance activities; and (v) operating and maintaining 
        dredged material disposal facilities''; and
        (2) in subparagraph (C) by striking ``rights-of-way, or dredged 
    material disposal areas,'' and inserting ``or rights-of-way,''.
    (f) Amendment of Cooperation Agreement.--If requested by the non-
Federal interest, the Secretary shall amend a project cooperation 
agreement executed on or before the date of the enactment of this Act 
to reflect the application of the amendments made by this section to 
any project for which a contract for construction has not been awarded 
on or before that date.
    (g) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section (including the 
amendments made by this section) shall increase, or result in the 
increase of, the non-Federal share of the costs of--
        (1) expanding any confined dredged material disposal facility 
    that is operated by the Secretary and that is authorized for cost 
    recovery through the collection of tolls;
        (2) any confined dredged material disposal facility for which 
    the invitation for bids for construction was issued before the date 
    of the enactment of this Act; and
        (3) expanding any confined dredged material disposal facility 
    constructed under section 123 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 
    (33 U.S.C. 1293a) if the capacity of the confined dredged material 
    disposal facility was exceeded in less than 6 years.

SEC. 202. FLOOD CONTROL POLICY.

    (a) Flood Control Cost Sharing.--
        (1) Increased non-federal contributions.--
            (A) In general.--Subsections (a) and (b) of section 103 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213 (a) 
        and (b)) are each amended by striking ``25 percent'' each place 
        it appears and inserting ``35 percent''.
            (B) Applicability.--The amendments made by subparagraph (A) 
        shall apply to any project authorized after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act and to any flood control project that is 
        not specifically authorized by Congress for which a Detailed 
        Project Report is approved after such date of enactment or, in 
        the case of a project for which no Detailed Project Report is 
        prepared, construction is initiated after such date of 
        enactment.
        (2) Physical construction defined.--Section 103(e)(1) of such 
    Act (33 U.S.C. 2213(e)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
    following: ``For the purpose of the preceding sentence, physical 
    construction shall be considered to be initiated on the date of the 
    award of a construction contract.''.
    (b) Ability To Pay.--
        (1) In general.--Section 103(m) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)) 
    is amended to read as follows:
    ``(m) Ability To Pay.--
        ``(1) In general.--Any cost-sharing agreement under this 
    section for flood control or agricultural water supply shall be 
    subject to the ability of a non-Federal interest to pay.
        ``(2) Criteria and procedures.--The ability of a non-Federal 
    interest to pay shall be determined by the Secretary in accordance 
    with criteria and procedures in effect on the day before the date 
    of the enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996; 
    except that such criteria and procedures shall be revised within 1 
    year after such date of enactment to reflect the requirements of 
    paragraph (3).
        ``(3) Revision of criteria and procedures.--In revising 
    criteria and procedures pursuant to paragraph (2), the Secretary--
            ``(A) shall consider--
                ``(i) per capita income data for the county or counties 
            in which the project is to be located; and
                ``(ii) the per capita non-Federal cost of construction 
            of the project for the county or counties in which the 
            project is to be located;
            ``(B) shall not consider criteria (other than criteria 
        described in subparagraph (A)) in effect on the day before the 
        date of the enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1996; and
            ``(C) may consider additional criteria relating to the non-
        Federal interest's financial ability to carry out its cost-
        sharing responsibilities, to the extent that the application of 
        such criteria does not eliminate areas from eligibility for a 
        reduction in the non-Federal share as determined under 
        subparagraph (A).
        ``(4) Non-federal share.--Notwithstanding subsection (a), the 
    Secretary may reduce the requirement that a non-Federal interest 
    make a cash contribution for any project that is determined to be 
    eligible for a reduction in the non-Federal share under criteria 
    and procedures in effect under paragraphs (1), (2), and (3).''.
        (2) Applicability.--
            (A) Generally.--Subject to subparagraph (C), the amendment 
        made by paragraph (1) shall apply to any project, or separable 
        element thereof, with respect to which the Secretary and the 
        non-Federal interest enter into a project cooperation agreement 
        after December 31, 1997.
            (B) Amendment of cooperation agreement.--If requested by 
        the non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall amend a project 
        cooperation agreement executed on or before the date of the 
        enactment of this Act to reflect the application of the 
        amendment made by paragraph (1) to any project for which a 
        contract for construction has not been awarded on or before 
        such date of enactment.
            (C) Non-federal option.--If requested by the non-Federal 
        interest, the Secretary shall apply the criteria and procedures 
        established pursuant to section 103(m) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 as in effect on the day before the date 
        of the enactment of this Act for projects that are authorized 
        before the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Floodplain Management Plans.--
        (1) In general.--Section 402 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-12; 
    100 Stat. 4133) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 402. FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS.

    ``(a) Compliance With Floodplain Management and Insurance 
Programs.--Before construction of any project for local flood 
protection, or any project for hurricane or storm damage reduction, 
that involves Federal assistance from the Secretary, the non-Federal 
interest shall agree to participate in and comply with applicable 
Federal floodplain management and flood insurance programs.
    ``(b) Flood Plain Management Plans.--Within 1 year after the date 
of signing a project cooperation agreement for construction of a 
project to which subsection (a) applies, the non-Federal interest shall 
prepare a flood plain management plan designed to reduce the impacts of 
future flood events in the project area. Such plan shall be implemented 
by the non-Federal interest not later than 1 year after completion of 
construction of the project.
    ``(c) Guidelines.--
        ``(1) In general.--Within 6 months after the date of the 
    enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall develop 
    guidelines for preparation of floodplain management plans by non-
    Federal interests under subsection (b). Such guidelines shall 
    address potential measures, practices, and policies to reduce loss 
    of life, injuries, damages to property and facilities, public 
    expenditures, and other adverse impacts associated with flooding 
    and to preserve and enhance natural floodplain values.
        ``(2) Limitation on statutory construction.--Nothing in this 
    subsection shall be construed to confer any regulatory authority 
    upon the Secretary or the Director of the Federal Emergency 
    Management Agency.
    ``(d) Technical Support.--The Secretary may provide technical 
support to a non-Federal interest for a project to which subsection (a) 
applies for the development and implementation of plans prepared under 
subsection (b).''.
        (2) Applicability.--The amendment made by paragraph (1) shall 
    apply to any project or separable element thereof with respect to 
    which the Secretary and the non-Federal interest have not entered 
    into a project cooperation agreement on or before the date of the 
    enactment of this Act.
    (d) Nonstructural Flood Control Policy.--
        (1) Review.--The Secretary shall conduct a review of policies, 
    procedures, and techniques relating to the evaluation and 
    development of flood control measures with a view toward 
    identifying impediments that may exist to justifying nonstructural 
    flood control measures as alternatives to structural measures.
        (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
    report on the findings of the review conducted under this 
    subsection, together with any recommendations for modifying 
    existing law to remove any impediments identified under such 
    review.
    (e) Emergency Response.--Section 5(a)(1) of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved August 
18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n(a)(1)), is amended by inserting before the 
first semicolon the following: ``, or in implementation of 
nonstructural alternatives to the repair or restoration of such flood 
control work if requested by the non-Federal sponsor''.
    (f) Levee Owners Manual.--Section 5 of such Act of August 18, 1941 
(33 U.S.C. 701n), is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Levee Owners Manual.--
        ``(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
    enactment of this subsection, in accordance with chapter 5 of title 
    5, United States Code, the Secretary of the Army shall prepare a 
    manual describing the maintenance and upkeep responsibilities that 
    the Corps of Engineers requires of a non-Federal interest in order 
    for the non-Federal interest to receive Federal assistance under 
    this section. The Secretary shall provide a copy of the manual at 
    no cost to each non-Federal interest that is eligible to receive 
    Federal assistance under this section.
        ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
    be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
        ``(3) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
    definitions apply:
            ``(A) Maintenance and upkeep.--The term `maintenance and 
        upkeep' means all maintenance and general upkeep of a levee 
        performed on a regular and consistent basis that is not repair 
        and rehabilitation.
            ``(B) Repair and rehabilitation.--The term `repair and 
        rehabilitation'--
                ``(i) means the repair or rebuilding of a levee or 
            other flood control structure, after the structure has been 
            damaged by a flood, to the level of protection provided by 
            the structure before the flood; but
                ``(ii) does not include--

                    ``(I) any improvement to the structure; or
                    ``(II) repair or rebuilding described in clause (i) 
                if, in the normal course of usage, the structure 
                becomes structurally unsound and is no longer fit to 
                provide the level of protection for which the structure 
                was designed.''.

    (g) Vegetation Management Guidelines.--
        (1) Review.--The Secretary shall undertake a comprehensive 
    review of the current policy guidelines on vegetation management 
    for levees. The review shall examine current policies in view of 
    the varied interests in providing flood control, preserving, 
    protecting, and enhancing natural resources, protecting the rights 
    of Native Americans pursuant to treaty and statute, and such other 
    factors as the Secretary considers appropriate.
        (2) Cooperation and consultation.--The review under this 
    section shall be undertaken in cooperation with interested Federal 
    agencies and in consultation with interested representatives of 
    State and local governments and the public.
        (3) Revision of guidelines.--Based upon the results of the 
    review, the Secretary shall revise, not later than 270 days after 
    the date of the enactment of this Act, the policy guidelines so as 
    to provide a coherent and coordinated policy for vegetation 
    management for levees. Such revised guidelines shall address 
    regional variations in levee management and resource needs and 
    shall be incorporated in the manual proposed under section 5(c) of 
    such Act of August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n).
    (h) Risk-Based Analysis Methodology.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
    with the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study of the 
    Corps of Engineers' use of risk-based analysis for the evaluation 
    of hydrology, hydraulics, and economics in flood damage reduction 
    studies. The study shall include--
            (A) an evaluation of the impact of risk-based analysis on 
        project formulation, project economic justification, and 
        minimum engineering and safety standards; and
            (B) a review of studies conducted using risk-based analysis 
        to determine--
                (i) the scientific validity of applying risk-based 
            analysis in these studies; and
                (ii) the impact of using risk-based analysis as it 
            relates to current policy and procedures of the Corps of 
            Engineers.
        (2) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
    report on the results of the study under paragraph (1), as well as 
    such recommendations as the Secretary considers appropriate.
        (3) Limitation on use of methodology.--During the period 
    beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act and ending 18 
    months after that date, if requested by a non-Federal interest, the 
    Secretary shall refrain from using any risk-based technique 
    required under the studies described in paragraph (1) for the 
    evaluation and design of a project.
        (4) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated $250,000 to carry out this subsection.

SEC. 203. COST SHARING FOR FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

    (a) Non-Federal Share.--Section 105(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)) is amended--
        (1) by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
        ``(1) Cost sharing.--
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall not initiate any 
        feasibility study for a water resources project after November 
        17, 1986, until appropriate non-Federal interests agree, by 
        contract, to contribute 50 percent of the cost of the study.
            ``(B) Payment of cost share during period of study.--During 
        the period of the study, the non-Federal share of the cost of 
        the study payable under subparagraph (A) shall be 50 percent of 
        the sum of--
                ``(i) the cost estimate for the study as contained in 
            the feasibility cost-sharing agreement; and
                ``(ii) any excess of the cost of the study over the 
            cost estimate if the excess results from--

                    ``(I) a change in Federal law; or
                    ``(II) a change in the scope of the study requested 
                by the non-Federal interests.

            ``(C) Payment of cost share on authorization of project or 
        termination of study.--
                ``(i) Project timely authorized.--Except as otherwise 
            agreed to by the Secretary and the non-Federal interests 
            and subject to clause (ii), the non-Federal share of any 
            excess of the cost of the study over the cost estimate 
            (excluding any excess cost described in subparagraph 
            (B)(ii)) shall be payable on the date on which the 
            Secretary and the non-Federal interests enter into an 
            agreement pursuant to section 101(e) or 103(j) with respect 
            to the project.
                ``(ii) Project not timely authorized.--If the project 
            that is the subject of the study is not authorized by the 
            date that is 5 years after the completion of the final 
            report of the Chief of Engineers concerning the study or 
            the date that is 2 years after the termination of the 
            study, the non-Federal share of any excess of the cost of 
            the study over the cost estimate (excluding any excess cost 
            described in subparagraph (B)(ii)) shall be payable to the 
            United States on that date.
            ``(D) Amendment of cost estimate.--The cost estimate 
        referred to in subparagraph (B)(i) may be amended only by 
        agreement of the Secretary and the non-Federal interests.
            ``(E) In-kind contributions.--Not more than \1/2\ of the 
        non-Federal share required under this paragraph may be 
        satisfied by the provision of services, materials, supplies, or 
        other in-kind services necessary to prepare the feasibility 
        report.''; and
        (2) in paragraph (2) by striking ``(2) This subsection'' and 
    inserting the following:
        ``(2) Applicability.--This subsection''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply notwithstanding any feasibility cost-sharing agreement entered 
into by the Secretary and the non-Federal interests. On request of the 
non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall amend any feasibility cost-
sharing agreements in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act 
so as to conform the agreements with the amendments.
    (c) No Requirement of Reimbursement.--Nothing in this section or 
any amendment made by this section requires the Secretary to reimburse 
the non-Federal interests for funds previously contributed for a study.

SEC. 204. RESTORATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.

    (a) Review of Projects.--Section 1135(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``the operation of''; and
        (2) by inserting before the period at the end the following: 
    ``and to determine if the operation of such projects has 
    contributed to the degradation of the quality of the environment''.
    (b) Program of Projects.--Section 1135(b) of such Act is amended by 
striking the last 2 sentences.
    (c) Restoration of Environmental Quality.--Section 1135 of such Act 
is amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as 
    subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively;
        (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Restoration of Environmental Quality.--If the Secretary 
determines that construction of a water resources project by the 
Secretary or operation of a water resources project constructed by the 
Secretary has contributed to the degradation of the quality of the 
environment, the Secretary may undertake measures for restoration of 
environmental quality and measures for enhancement of environmental 
quality that are associated with the restoration, through modifications 
either at the project site or at other locations that have been 
affected by the construction or operation of the project, if such 
measures do not conflict with the authorized project purposes.
    ``(d) Non-Federal Share; Limitation on Maximum Federal 
Expenditure.--The non-Federal share of the cost of any modifications or 
measures carried out or undertaken pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) 
shall be 25 percent. Not more than 80 percent of the non-Federal share 
may be in kind, including a facility, supply, or service that is 
necessary to carry out the modification or measure. Not more than 
$5,000,000 in Federal funds may be expended on any single modification 
or measure carried out or undertaken pursuant to this section.''; and
        (3) in subsection (f) (as so redesignated) by striking 
    ``program conducted under subsection (b)'' and inserting ``programs 
    conducted under subsections (b) and (c)''.
    (d) Definition.--Section 1135 of such Act (as amended by subsection 
(c)(1) of this section) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Definition.--In this section, the term `water resources 
project constructed by the Secretary' includes a water resources 
project constructed or funded jointly by the Secretary and the head of 
any other Federal agency (including the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service).''.

SEC. 205. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1252 note; 104 Stat. 4639-4640) is amended--
        (1) in each of subsections (a), (b), and (c) by inserting ``and 
    remediate'' after ``remove'' each place it appears;
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``and remediation'' after 
        ``removal'' each place it appears; and
            (B) in paragraph (2) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000''; and
        (3) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Priority Work.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall give priority to work in the following areas:
        ``(1) Brooklyn Waterfront, New York.
        ``(2) Buffalo Harbor and River, New York.
        ``(3) Ashtabula River, Ohio.
        ``(4) Mahoning River, Ohio.
        ``(5) Lower Fox River, Wisconsin.''.

SEC. 206. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) General Authority.--The Secretary may carry out an aquatic 
ecosystem restoration and protection project if the Secretary 
determines that the project--
        (1) will improve the quality of the environment and is in the 
    public interest; and
        (2) is cost-effective.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Non-Federal interests shall provide 35 percent 
of the cost of construction of any project carried out under this 
section, including provision of all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
and necessary relocations.
    (c) Agreements.--Construction of a project under this section shall 
be initiated only after a non-Federal interest has entered into a 
binding agreement with the Secretary to pay the non-Federal share of 
the costs of construction required by this section and to pay 100 
percent of any operation, maintenance, and replacement and 
rehabilitation costs with respect to the project in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
    (d) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may 
be allotted under this section for a project at any single locality.
    (e) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section $25,000,000 for each fiscal year.

SEC. 207. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2326; 106 Stat. 4826) is amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
        (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Selection of Dredged Material Disposal Method.--In developing 
and carrying out a project for navigation involving the disposal of 
dredged material, the Secretary may select, with the consent of the 
non-Federal interest, a disposal method that is not the least-cost 
option if the Secretary determines that the incremental costs of such 
disposal method are reasonable in relation to the environmental 
benefits, including the benefits to the aquatic environment to be 
derived from the creation of wetlands and control of shoreline erosion. 
The Federal share of such incremental costs shall be determined in 
accordance with subsection (c).''.

SEC. 208. RECREATION POLICY AND USER FEES.

    (a) Recreation Policy.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide increased emphasis 
    on, and opportunities for recreation at, water resources projects 
    operated, maintained, or constructed by the Corps of Engineers.
        (2) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
    report on specific measures taken to implement this subsection.
    (b) User Fees.--
        (1) In general.--Section 210(b)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 
    1968 (16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b)(4)) is amended by inserting before the 
    period at the end the following: ``and, subject to the availability 
    of appropriations, shall be used for the purposes specified in 
    section 4(i)(3) of such Act at the water resources development 
    project at which the fees were collected''.
        (2) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to 
    the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the 
    Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
    Representatives a report, with respect to fiscal years 1995 and 
    1996, on--
            (A) the amount of day-use fees collected under section 
        210(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b)) 
        at each water resources development project; and
            (B) the administrative costs associated with the collection 
        of the day-use fees at each water resources development 
        project.
    (c) Alternative to Annual Passes.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall evaluate the feasibility 
    of implementing an alternative to the $25 annual pass that the 
    Secretary currently offers to users of recreation facilities at 
    water resources projects of the Corps of Engineers.
        (2) Annual pass.--The evaluation under paragraph (1) shall 
    include the establishment on a test basis of an annual pass that 
    costs $10 or less for the use of recreation facilities, including 
    facilities at Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
        (3) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1999, the Secretary 
    shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the 
    evaluation carried out under this subsection, together with 
    recommendations concerning whether annual passes for individual 
    projects should be offered on a nationwide basis.
        (4) Expiration of authority.--The authority to establish an 
    annual pass under paragraph (2) shall expire on the later of 
    December 31, 1999, or the date of transmittal of the report under 
    paragraph (3).

SEC. 209. RECOVERY OF COSTS.

    Amounts recovered under section 107 of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 
U.S.C. 9607) for any response action taken by the Secretary in support 
of the civil works program of the Department of the Army and any other 
amounts recovered by the Secretary from a contractor, insurer, surety, 
or other person to reimburse the Department of the Army for any 
expenditure for environmental response activities in support of the 
Army civil works program shall be credited to the appropriate trust 
fund account from which the cost of such response action has been paid 
or will be charged.

SEC. 210. COST SHARING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c); 100 Stat. 4085) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (5);
        (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (6) and 
    inserting ``; and''; and
        (3) by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:
        ``(7) environmental protection and restoration: 35 percent; 
    except that nothing in this paragraph shall affect or limit the 
    applicability of section 906.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply 
only to projects authorized after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

SEC. 211. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
              INTERESTS.

    (a) Authority.--Non-Federal interests are authorized to undertake 
flood control projects in the United States, subject to obtaining any 
permits required pursuant to Federal and State laws in advance of 
actual construction.
    (b) Studies and Design Activities.--
        (1) By non-federal interests.--A non-Federal interest may 
    prepare, for review and approval by the Secretary, the necessary 
    studies and design documents for any construction to be undertaken 
    pursuant to subsection (a).
        (2) By secretary.--Upon request of an appropriate non-Federal 
    interest, the Secretary may undertake all necessary studies and 
    design activities for any construction to be undertaken pursuant to 
    subsection (a) and provide technical assistance in obtaining all 
    necessary permits for such construction if the non-Federal interest 
    contracts with the Secretary to provide to the United States funds 
    for the studies and design activities during the period in which 
    the studies and design activities will be conducted.
    (c) Completion of Studies and Design Activities.--In the case of 
any study or design documents for a flood control project that were 
initiated before the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
may complete and transmit to the appropriate non-Federal interests the 
study or design documents or, upon the request of such non-Federal 
interests, terminate the study or design activities and transmit the 
partially completed study or design documents to such non-Federal 
interests for completion. Studies and design documents subject to this 
subsection shall be completed without regard to the requirements of 
subsection (b).
    (d) Authority To Carry Out Improvement.--
        (1) In general.--Any non-Federal interest that has received 
    from the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) a favorable 
    recommendation to carry out a flood control project, or separable 
    element of a flood control project, based on the results of 
    completed studies and design documents for the project or element 
    may carry out the project or element if a final environmental 
    impact statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 
    1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) has been filed for the project or 
    element.
        (2) Permits.--Any plan of improvement proposed to be 
    implemented in accordance with this subsection shall be deemed to 
    satisfy the requirements for obtaining the appropriate permits 
    required under the Secretary's authority. Such permits shall be 
    granted subject to the non-Federal interest's acceptance of the 
    terms and conditions of such permits if the Secretary determines 
    that the applicable regulatory criteria and procedures have been 
    satisfied.
        (3) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall monitor any project for 
    which a permit is granted under this subsection in order to ensure 
    that such project is constructed, operated, and maintained in 
    accordance with the terms and conditions of such permit.
    (e) Reimbursement.--
        (1) General rule.--Subject to appropriations Acts, the 
    Secretary may reimburse any non-Federal interest an amount equal to 
    the estimate of the Federal share, without interest, of the cost of 
    any authorized flood control project, or separable element of a 
    flood control project, constructed pursuant to this section--
            (A) if, after authorization and before initiation of 
        construction of the project or separable element, the Secretary 
        approves the plans for construction of such project by the non-
        Federal interest; and
            (B) if the Secretary finds, after a review of studies and 
        design documents prepared pursuant to this section, that 
        construction of the project or separable element is 
        economically justified and environmentally acceptable.
        (2) Special rules.--
            (A) Reimbursement.--For work (including work associated 
        with studies, planning, design, and construction) carried out 
        by a non-Federal interest with respect to a project described 
        in subsection (f), the Secretary shall, subject to amounts 
        being made available in advance in appropriations Acts, 
        reimburse, without interest, the non-Federal interest an amount 
        equal to the estimated Federal share of the cost of such work 
        if such work is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and 
        approved by the Secretary.
            (B) Credit.--If the non-Federal interest for a project 
        described in subsection (f) carries out work before completion 
        of a reconnaissance study by the Secretary and if such work is 
        determined by the Secretary to be compatible with the project 
        later recommended by the Secretary, the Secretary shall credit 
        the non-Federal interest for its share of the cost of the 
        project for such work.
        (3) Matters to be considered in reviewing plans.--In reviewing 
    plans under this subsection, the Secretary shall consider budgetary 
    and programmatic priorities and other factors that the Secretary 
    considers appropriate.
        (4) Monitoring.--The Secretary shall regularly monitor and 
    audit any project for flood control approved for construction under 
    this section by a non-Federal interest to ensure that such 
    construction is in compliance with the plans approved by the 
    Secretary and that the costs are reasonable.
        (5) Limitation on reimbursements.--The Secretary may not make 
    any reimbursement under this section until the Secretary determines 
    that the work for which reimbursement is requested has been 
    performed in accordance with applicable permits and approved plans.
    (f) Specific Projects.--For the purpose of demonstrating the 
potential advantages and effectiveness of non-Federal implementation of 
flood control projects, the Secretary shall enter into agreements 
pursuant to this section with non-Federal interests for development of 
the following flood control projects by such interests:
        (1) Berryessa creek, california.--The Berryessa Creek element 
    of the project for flood control, Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, 
    California, authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606); except that, subject to 
    the approval of the Secretary as provided by this section, the non-
    Federal interest may design and construct an alternative to such 
    element.
        (2) Los angeles county drainage area, california.--The project 
    for flood control, Los Angeles County Drainage Area, California, 
    authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources Development Act 
    of 1990 (104 Stat. 4611).
        (3) Stockton metropolitan area, california.--The project for 
    flood control, Stockton Metropolitan Area, California.
        (4) Upper guadalupe river, california.--The project for flood 
    control, Upper Guadalupe River, California.
        (5) Flamingo and tropicana washes, nevada.--The project for 
    flood control, Las Vegas Wash and Tributaries (Flamingo and 
    Tropicana Washes), Nevada, authorized by section 101(13) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803).
        (6) Brays bayou, texas.--Flood control components comprising 
    the Brays Bayou element of the project for flood control, Buffalo 
    Bayou and tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of 
    the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610); 
    except that, subject to the approval of the Secretary as provided 
    by this section, the non-Federal interest may design and construct 
    an alternative to the diversion component of such element.
        (7) Hunting bayou, texas.--The Hunting Bayou element of the 
    project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, Texas, 
    authorized by such section; except that, subject to the approval of 
    the Secretary as provided by this section, the non-Federal interest 
    may design and construct an alternative to such element.
        (8) White oak bayou, texas.--The project for flood control, 
    White Oak Bayou watershed, Texas.
    (g) Treatment of Flood Damage Prevention Measures.--For the 
purposes of this section, flood damage prevention measures at or in the 
vicinity of Morgan City and Berwick, Louisiana, shall be treated as an 
authorized separable element of the Atchafalaya Basin feature of the 
project for flood control, Mississippi River and Tributaries.

SEC. 212. ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATIONS OF NATIONAL 
              SIGNIFICANCE.

    (a) Surveys, Plans, and Studies.--To encourage innovative and 
environmentally sound engineering solutions and innovative 
environmental solutions to problems of national significance, the 
Secretary may undertake surveys, plans, and studies and prepare reports 
that may lead to work under existing civil works authorities or to 
recommendations for authorizations.
    (b) Funding.--
        (1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for each of 
    fiscal years 1997 through 2000.
        (2) Funding from other sources.--The Secretary may accept and 
    expend additional funds from other Federal agencies, States, or 
    non-Federal entities for purposes of carrying out this section.

SEC. 213. LEASE AUTHORITY.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may lease 
space available in buildings for which funding for construction or 
purchase was provided from the revolving fund established by the 1st 
section of the Civil Functions Appropriations Act, 1954 (33 U.S.C. 576; 
67 Stat. 199), under such terms and conditions as are acceptable to the 
Secretary. The proceeds from such leases shall be credited to the 
revolving fund for the purposes set forth in such Act.

SEC. 214. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) Funding From Other Federal Sources.--Section 7 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 2313; 102 Stat. 4022-4023) 
is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``civil works'' before 
    ``mission''; and
        (2) by striking subsection (e) and inserting the following:
    ``(e) Funding From Other Federal Sources.--The Secretary may accept 
and expend additional funds from other Federal programs, including 
other Department of Defense programs, to carry out this section.''.
    (b) Pre-Agreement Temporary Protection of Technology.--Section 7 of 
such Act is amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e) as 
    subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
        (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Pre-Agreement Temporary Protection of Technology.--
        ``(1) In general.--If the Secretary determines that information 
    developed as a result of research and development activities 
    conducted by the Corps of Engineers is likely to be subject to a 
    cooperative research and development agreement within 2 years of 
    its development and that such information would be a trade secret 
    or commercial or financial information that would be privileged or 
    confidential if the information had been obtained from a non-
    Federal party participating in a cooperative research and 
    development agreement under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler 
    Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a), the Secretary 
    may provide appropriate protection against the dissemination of 
    such information, including exemption from subchapter II of chapter 
    5 of title 5, United States Code, until the earlier of the date the 
    Secretary enters into such an agreement with respect to such 
    technology or the last day of the 2-year period beginning on the 
    date of such determination.
        ``(2) Treatment.--Any technology covered by this section that 
    becomes the subject of a cooperative research and development 
    agreement shall be accorded the protection provided under section 
    12(c)(7)(B) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 3710a(c)(7)(B)) as if such 
    technology had been developed under a cooperative research and 
    development agreement.''; and
        (3) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated) by striking ``(b)'' 
    and inserting ``(c)''.

SEC. 215. NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.

    (a) Purpose.--The purpose of this section is to reduce the risks to 
life and property from dam failure in the United States through the 
establishment and maintenance of an effective national dam safety 
program to bring together the expertise and resources of the Federal 
and non-Federal communities in achieving national dam safety hazard 
reduction. It is not the intent of this section to preempt any other 
Federal or State authorities nor is it the intent of this section to 
mandate State participation in the grant assistance program to be 
established under this section.
    (b) Effect on Other Dam Safety Programs.--Nothing in this section 
(including the amendments made by this section) shall preempt or 
otherwise affect any dam safety program of a Federal agency other than 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including any program that 
regulates, permits, or licenses any activity affecting a dam.
    (c) Dam Safety Program.--The Act entitled ``An Act to authorize the 
Secretary of the Army to undertake a national program of inspection of 
dams'', approved August 8, 1972 (33 U.S.C 467 et seq.; Public Law 92-
367), is amended--
        (1) by striking the 1st section and inserting the following:

``SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    ``This Act may be cited as the `National Dam Safety Program 
Act'.'';
        (2) by striking sections 5 through 14;
        (3) by redesignating sections 2, 3, and 4 as sections 3, 4, and 
    5, respectively;
        (4) by inserting after section 1 (as amended by paragraph (1) 
    of this subsection) the following:

``SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    ``In this Act, the following definitions apply:
        ``(1) Board.--The term `Board' means a National Dam Safety 
    Review Board established under section 8(h).
        ``(2) Dam.--The term `dam'--
            ``(A) means any artificial barrier that has the ability to 
        impound water, wastewater, or any liquid-borne material, for 
        the purpose of storage or control of water, that--
                ``(i) is 25 feet or more in height from--

                    ``(I) the natural bed of the stream channel or 
                watercourse measured at the downstream toe of the 
                barrier; or
                    ``(II) if the barrier is not across a stream 
                channel or watercourse, from the lowest elevation of 
                the outside limit of the barrier;

            to the maximum water storage elevation; or
                ``(ii) has an impounding capacity for maximum storage 
            elevation of 50 acre-feet or more; but
            ``(B) does not include--
                ``(i) a levee; or
                ``(ii) a barrier described in subparagraph (A) that--

                    ``(I) is 6 feet or less in height regardless of 
                storage capacity; or
                    ``(II) has a storage capacity at the maximum water 
                storage elevation that is 15 acre-feet or less 
                regardless of height;

            unless the barrier, because of the location of the barrier 
            or another physical characteristic of the barrier, is 
            likely to pose a significant threat to human life or 
            property if the barrier fails (as determined by the 
            Director).
        ``(3) Director.--The term `Director' means the Director of 
    FEMA.
        ``(4) Federal agency.--The term `Federal agency' means a 
    Federal agency that designs, finances, constructs, owns, operates, 
    maintains, or regulates the construction, operation, or maintenance 
    of a dam.
        ``(5) Federal guidelines for dam safety.--The term `Federal 
    Guidelines for Dam Safety' means the FEMA publication, numbered 93 
    and dated June 1979, that defines management practices for dam 
    safety at all Federal agencies.
        ``(6) FEMA.--The term `FEMA' means the Federal Emergency 
    Management Agency.
        ``(7) Hazard reduction.--The term `hazard reduction' means the 
    reduction in the potential consequences to life and property of dam 
    failure.
        ``(8) ICODS.--The term `ICODS' means the Interagency Committee 
    on Dam Safety established by section 7.
        ``(9) Program.--The term `Program' means the national dam 
    safety program established under section 8.
        ``(10) State.--The term `State' means each of the several 
    States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the 
    Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, American 
    Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and any 
    other territory or possession of the United States.
        ``(11) State dam safety agency.--The term `State dam safety 
    agency' means a State agency that has regulatory authority over the 
    safety of non-Federal dams.
        ``(12) State dam safety program.--The term `State dam safety 
    program' means a State dam safety program approved and assisted 
    under section 8(f).
        ``(13) United states.--The term `United States', when used in a 
    geographical sense, means all of the States.'';
        (5) in section 3 (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this 
    subsection)--
            (A) by striking ``Sec. 3. As'' and inserting the following:

``SEC. 3. INSPECTION OF DAMS.

    ``(a) In General.--As''; and
            (B) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) State Participation.--On request of a State dam safety 
agency, with respect to any dam the failure of which would affect the 
State, the head of a Federal agency shall--
        ``(1) provide information to the State dam safety agency on the 
    construction, operation, or maintenance of the dam; or
        ``(2) allow any official of the State dam safety agency to 
    participate in the Federal inspection of the dam.'';
        (6) in section 4 (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this 
    subsection) by striking ``Sec. 4. As'' and inserting the following:

``SEC. 4. INVESTIGATION REPORTS TO GOVERNORS.

    ``As'';
        (7) in section 5 (as redesignated by paragraph (3) of this 
    subsection) by striking ``Sec. 5. For'' and inserting the 
    following:

``SEC. 5. DETERMINATION OF DANGER TO HUMAN LIFE AND PROPERTY.

    ``For''; and
        (8) by inserting after section 5 (as redesignated by paragraph 
    (3) of this subsection) the following:

``SEC. 6. NATIONAL DAM INVENTORY.

    ``The Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, 
may maintain and periodically publish updated information on the 
inventory of dams in the United States.

``SEC. 7. INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE ON DAM SAFETY.

    ``(a) Establishment.--There is established an Interagency Committee 
on Dam Safety--
        ``(1) comprised of a representative of each of the Department 
    of Agriculture, the Department of Defense, the Department of 
    Energy, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Labor, 
    FEMA, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, the Tennessee Valley Authority, and the 
    United States Section of the International Boundary Commission; and
        ``(2) chaired by the Director.
    ``(b) Duties.--ICODS shall encourage the establishment and 
maintenance of effective Federal and State programs, policies, and 
guidelines intended to enhance dam safety for the protection of human 
life and property through--
        ``(1) coordination and information exchange among Federal 
    agencies and State dam safety agencies; and
        ``(2) coordination and information exchange among Federal 
    agencies concerning implementation of the Federal Guidelines for 
    Dam Safety.

``SEC. 8. NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM.

    ``(a) In General.--The Director, in consultation with ICODS and 
State dam safety agencies, and the Board shall establish and maintain, 
in accordance with this section, a coordinated national dam safety 
program. The Program shall--
        ``(1) be administered by FEMA to achieve the objectives set 
    forth in subsection (c);
        ``(2) involve, to the extent appropriate, each Federal agency; 
    and
        ``(3) include--
            ``(A) each of the components described in subsection (d);
            ``(B) the implementation plan described in subsection (e); 
        and
            ``(C) assistance for State dam safety programs described in 
        subsection (f).
    ``(b) Duties.--The Director shall--
        ``(1) not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment 
    of this paragraph, develop the implementation plan described in 
    subsection (e);
        ``(2) not later than 300 days after the date of the enactment 
    of this paragraph, submit to the appropriate authorizing committees 
    of Congress the implementation plan described in subsection (e); 
    and
        ``(3) by regulation, not later than 360 days after the date of 
    the enactment of this paragraph--
            ``(A) develop and implement the Program;
            ``(B) establish goals, priorities, and target dates for 
        implementation of the Program; and
            ``(C) to the extent feasible, provide a method for 
        cooperation and coordination with, and assistance to, 
        interested governmental entities in all States.
    ``(c) Objectives.--The objectives of the Program are to--
        ``(1) ensure that new and existing dams are safe through the 
    development of technologically and economically feasible programs 
    and procedures for national dam safety hazard reduction;
        ``(2) encourage acceptable engineering policies and procedures 
    to be used for dam site investigation, design, construction, 
    operation and maintenance, and emergency preparedness;
        ``(3) encourage the establishment and implementation of 
    effective dam safety programs in each State based on State 
    standards;
        ``(4) develop and encourage public awareness projects to 
    increase public acceptance and support of State dam safety 
    programs;
        ``(5) develop technical assistance materials for Federal and 
    non-Federal dam safety programs; and
        ``(6) develop mechanisms with which to provide Federal 
    technical assistance for dam safety to the non-Federal sector.
    ``(d) Components.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Program shall consist of--
            ``(A) a Federal element and a non-Federal element; and
            ``(B) leadership activity, technical assistance activity, 
        and public awareness activity.
        ``(2) Elements.--
            ``(A) Federal.--The Federal element shall incorporate the 
        activities and practices carried out by Federal agencies under 
        section 7 to implement the Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety.
            ``(B) Non-federal.--The non-Federal element shall consist 
        of--
                ``(i) the activities and practices carried out by 
            States, local governments, and the private sector to safely 
            build, regulate, operate, and maintain dams; and
                ``(ii) Federal activities that foster State efforts to 
            develop and implement effective programs for the safety of 
            dams.
        ``(3) Functional activities.--
            ``(A) Leadership.--The leadership activity shall be the 
        responsibility of FEMA and shall be exercised by chairing ICODS 
        to coordinate Federal efforts in cooperation with State dam 
        safety officials.
            ``(B) Technical assistance.--The technical assistance 
        activity shall consist of the transfer of knowledge and 
        technical information among the Federal and non-Federal 
        elements described in paragraph (2).
            ``(C) Public awareness.--The public awareness activity 
        shall provide for the education of the public, including State 
        and local officials, in the hazards of dam failure, methods of 
        reducing the adverse consequences of dam failure, and related 
        matters.
    ``(e) Implementation Plan.--The Director shall--
        ``(1) develop an implementation plan for the Program that shall 
    set, through fiscal year 2002, year-by-year targets that 
    demonstrate improvements in dam safety; and
        ``(2) recommend appropriate roles for Federal agencies and for 
    State and local units of government, individuals, and private 
    organizations in carrying out the implementation plan.
    ``(f) Assistance for State Dam Safety Programs.--
        ``(1) In general.--To encourage the establishment and 
    maintenance of effective State programs intended to ensure dam 
    safety, to protect human life and property, and to improve State 
    dam safety programs, the Director shall provide assistance with 
    amounts made available under section 12 to assist States in 
    establishing and maintaining dam safety programs--
            ``(A) in accordance with the criteria specified in 
        paragraph (2); and
            ``(B) in accordance with more advanced requirements and 
        standards established by the Board and the Director with the 
        assistance of established criteria such as the Model State Dam 
        Safety Program published by FEMA, numbered 123 and dated April 
        1987, and amendments to the Model State Dam Safety Program.
        ``(2) Criteria and budgeting requirement.--For a State to be 
    eligible for primary assistance under this subsection, a State dam 
    safety program must be working toward meeting the following 
    criteria and budgeting requirement, and for a State to be eligible 
    for advanced assistance under this subsection, a State dam safety 
    program must meet the following criteria and budgeting requirement 
    and be working toward meeting the advanced requirements and 
    standards established under paragraph (1)(B):
            ``(A) Criteria.--For a State to be eligible for assistance 
        under this subsection, a State dam safety program must be 
        authorized by State legislation to include substantially, at a 
        minimum--
                ``(i) the authority to review and approve plans and 
            specifications to construct, enlarge, modify, remove, and 
            abandon dams;
                ``(ii) the authority to perform periodic inspections 
            during dam construction to ensure compliance with approved 
            plans and specifications;
                ``(iii) a requirement that, on completion of dam 
            construction, State approval must be given before operation 
            of the dam;
                ``(iv)(I) the authority to require or perform the 
            inspection, at least once every 5 years, of all dams and 
            reservoirs that would pose a significant threat to human 
            life and property in case of failure to determine the 
            continued safety of the dams and reservoirs; and
                ``(II) a procedure for more detailed and frequent 
            safety inspections;
                ``(v) a requirement that all inspections be performed 
            under the supervision of a State-registered professional 
            engineer with related experience in dam design and 
            construction;
                ``(vi) the authority to issue notices, when 
            appropriate, to require owners of dams to perform necessary 
            maintenance or remedial work, revise operating procedures, 
            or take other actions, including breaching dams when 
            necessary;
                ``(vii) regulations for carrying out the legislation of 
            the State described in this subparagraph;
                ``(viii) provision for necessary funds--

                    ``(I) to ensure timely repairs or other changes to, 
                or removal of, a dam in order to protect human life and 
                property; and
                    ``(II) if the owner of the dam does not take action 
                described in subclause (I), to take appropriate action 
                as expeditiously as practicable;

                ``(ix) a system of emergency procedures to be used if a 
            dam fails or if the failure of a dam is imminent; and
                ``(x) an identification of--

                    ``(I) each dam the failure of which could be 
                reasonably expected to endanger human life;
                    ``(II) the maximum area that could be flooded if 
                the dam failed; and
                    ``(III) necessary public facilities that would be 
                affected by the flooding.

            ``(B) Budgeting requirement.--For a State to be eligible 
        for assistance under this subsection, State appropriations must 
        be budgeted to carry out the legislation of the State under 
        subparagraph (A).
        ``(3) Work plans.--The Director shall enter into a contract 
    with each State receiving assistance under paragraph (2) to develop 
    a work plan necessary for the State dam safety program to reach a 
    level of program performance specified in the contract.
        ``(4) Maintenance of effort.--Assistance may not be provided to 
    a State under this subsection for a fiscal year unless the State 
    enters into such agreement with the Director as the Director 
    requires to ensure that the State will maintain the aggregate 
    expenditures of the State from all other sources for programs to 
    ensure dam safety for the protection of human life and property at 
    or above a level equal to the average annual level of such 
    expenditures for the 2 fiscal years preceding the fiscal year.
        ``(5) Approval of programs.--
            ``(A) Submission.--For a State to be eligible for 
        assistance under this subsection, a plan for a State dam safety 
        program shall be submitted to the Director for approval.
            ``(B) Approval.--A State dam safety program shall be deemed 
        to be approved 120 days after the date of receipt by the 
        Director unless the Director determines within the 120-day 
        period that the State dam safety program fails to meet the 
        requirements of paragraphs (1) through (3).
            ``(C) Notification of disapproval.--If the Director 
        determines that a State dam safety program does not meet the 
        requirements for approval, the Director shall immediately 
        notify the State in writing and provide the reasons for the 
        determination and the changes that are necessary for the plan 
        to be approved.
        ``(6) Review of state dam safety programs.--Using the expertise 
    of the Board, the Director shall periodically review State dam 
    safety programs. If the Board finds that a State dam safety program 
    has proven inadequate to reasonably protect human life and property 
    and the Director concurs, the Director shall revoke approval of the 
    State dam safety program, and withhold assistance under this 
    subsection, until the State dam safety program again meets the 
    requirements for approval.
    ``(g) Dam Safety Training.--At the request of any State that has or 
intends to develop a State dam safety program, the Director shall 
provide training for State dam safety staff and inspectors.
    ``(h) Board.--
        ``(1) Establishment.--The Director may establish an advisory 
    board to be known as the `National Dam Safety Review Board' to 
    monitor State implementation of this section.
        ``(2) Authority.--The Board may use the expertise of Federal 
    agencies and enter into contracts for necessary studies to carry 
    out this section.
        ``(3) Membership.--The Board shall consist of 11 members 
    selected by the Director for expertise in dam safety, of whom--
            ``(A) 1 member shall represent the Department of 
        Agriculture;
            ``(B) 1 member shall represent the Department of Defense;
            ``(C) 1 member shall represent the Department of the 
        Interior;
            ``(D) 1 member shall represent FEMA;
            ``(E) 1 member shall represent the Federal Energy 
        Regulatory Commission;
            ``(F) 5 members shall be selected by the Director from 
        among dam safety officials of States; and
            ``(G) 1 member shall be selected by the Director to 
        represent the United States Committee on Large Dams.
        ``(4) Compensation of members.--
            ``(A) Federal employees.--Each member of the Board who is 
        an officer or employee of the United States shall serve without 
        compensation in addition to compensation received for the 
        services of the member as an officer or employee of the United 
        States.
            ``(B) Other members.--Each member of the Board who is not 
        an officer or employee of the United States shall serve without 
        compensation.
        ``(5) Travel expenses.--Each member of the Board shall be 
    allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, 
    at rates authorized for an employee of an agency under subchapter I 
    of chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, while away from the 
    home or regular place of business of the member in the performance 
    of services for the Board.
        ``(6) Applicability of federal advisory committee act.--The 
    Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) shall not apply to 
    the Board.

``SEC. 9. RESEARCH.

    ``(a) In General.--The Director, in cooperation with ICODS, shall 
carry out a program of technical and archival research to develop--
        ``(1) improved techniques, historical experience, and equipment 
    for rapid and effective dam construction, rehabilitation, and 
    inspection; and
        ``(2) devices for the continued monitoring of the safety of 
    dams.
    ``(b) Consultation.--The Director shall provide for State 
participation in research under subsection (a) and periodically advise 
all States and Congress of the results of the research.

``SEC. 10. REPORTS.

    ``(a) Report on Dam Insurance.--Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this subsection, the Director shall report to 
Congress on the availability of dam insurance and make recommendations 
concerning encouraging greater availability.
    ``(b) Biennial Reports.--Not later than 90 days after the end of 
each odd-numbered fiscal year, the Director shall submit a report to 
Congress that--
        ``(1) describes the status of the Program;
        ``(2) describes the progress achieved by Federal agencies 
    during the 2 preceding fiscal years in implementing the Federal 
    Guidelines for Dam Safety;
        ``(3) describes the progress achieved in dam safety by States 
    participating in the Program; and
        ``(4) includes any recommendations for legislative and other 
    action that the Director considers necessary.

``SEC. 11. STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.

    ``Nothing in this Act and no action or failure to act under this 
Act shall--
        ``(1) create any liability in the United States or its officers 
    or employees for the recovery of damages caused by such action or 
    failure to act;
        ``(2) relieve an owner or operator of a dam of the legal 
    duties, obligations, or liabilities incident to the ownership or 
    operation of the dam; or
        ``(3) preempt any other Federal or State law.

``SEC. 12. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) National Dam Safety Program.--
        ``(1) Annual amounts.--There are authorized to be appropriated 
    to FEMA to carry out sections 7, 8, and 10 (in addition to any 
    amounts made available for similar purposes included in any other 
    Act and amounts made available under subsections (b) through (e)), 
    $1,000,000 for fiscal year 1998, $2,000,000 for fiscal year 1999, 
    $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2000, $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, 
    and $4,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.
        ``(2) Allocation.--
            ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraphs (B) and (C), 
        for each fiscal year, amounts made available under this 
        subsection to carry out section 8 shall be allocated among the 
        States as follows:
                ``(i) One-third among States that qualify for 
            assistance under section 8(f).
                ``(ii) Two-thirds among States that qualify for 
            assistance under section 8(f), to each such State in 
            proportion to--

                    ``(I) the number of dams in the State that are 
                listed as State-regulated dams on the inventory of dams 
                maintained under section 6; as compared to
                    ``(II) the number of dams in all States that are 
                listed as State-regulated dams on the inventory of dams 
                maintained under section 6.

            ``(B) Maximum amount of allocation.--The amount of funds 
        allocated to a State under this paragraph may not exceed 50 
        percent of the reasonable cost of implementing the State dam 
        safety program.
            ``(C) Determination.--The Director and the Board shall 
        determine the amount allocated to States needing primary 
        assistance and States needing advanced assistance under section 
        8(f).
    ``(b) National Dam Inventory.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out section 6 $500,000 for each fiscal year.
    ``(c) Dam Safety Training.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
to carry out section 8(g) $500,000 for each of fiscal years 1998 
through 2002.
    ``(d) Research.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out section 9 $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1998 through 2002.
    ``(e) Staff.--There is authorized to be appropriated to FEMA for 
the employment of such additional staff personnel as are necessary to 
carry out sections 6 through 9 $400,000 for each of fiscal years 1998 
through 2002.
    ``(f) Limitation on Use of Amounts.--Amounts made available under 
this Act may not be used to construct or repair any Federal or non-
Federal dam.''.
    (d) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3(2) of the Indian Dams Safety 
Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 3802(2); 108 Stat. 1560) is amended by striking 
``the first section of Public Law 92-367 (33 U.S.C. 467)'' and 
inserting ``section 2 of the National Dam Safety Program Act''.

SEC. 216. HYDROELECTRIC POWER PROJECT UPRATING.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out the maintenance, rehabilitation, 
and modernization of a hydroelectric power generating facility at a 
water resources project under the jurisdiction of the Department of the 
Army, the Secretary may take, to the extent funds are made available in 
appropriations Acts, such actions as are necessary to increase the 
efficiency of energy production or the capacity of the facility, or 
both, if, after consulting with the heads of other appropriate Federal 
and State agencies, the Secretary determines that the increase--
        (1) is economically justified and financially feasible;
        (2) will not result in any significant adverse effect on the 
    other purposes for which the project is authorized;
        (3) will not result in significant adverse environmental 
    impacts;
        (4) will not involve major structural or operational changes in 
    the project; and
        (5) will not adversely affect the use, management, or 
    protection of existing Federal, State, or tribal water rights.
    (b) Consultation.--Before proceeding with the proposed uprating 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall provide affected State, 
tribal, and Federal agencies with a copy of the proposed determinations 
under subsection (a). If the agencies submit comments, the Secretary 
shall accept those comments or respond in writing to any objections 
those agencies raise to the proposed determinations.
    (c) Effect on Other Authority.--This section shall not affect the 
authority of the Secretary and the Administrator of the Bonneville 
Power Administration under section 2406 of the Energy Policy Act of 
1992 (16 U.S.C. 839d-1; 106 Stat. 3099).

SEC. 217. DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL FACILITY PARTNERSHIPS.

    (a) Additional Capacity.--
        (1) Provided by secretary.--At the request of a non-Federal 
    interest with respect to a project, the Secretary may provide 
    additional capacity at a dredged material disposal facility 
    constructed by the Secretary beyond the capacity that would be 
    required for project purposes if the non-Federal interest agrees to 
    pay, during the period of construction, all costs associated with 
    the construction of the additional capacity.
        (2) Cost recovery authority.--The non-Federal interest may 
    recover the costs assigned to the additional capacity through fees 
    assessed on third parties whose dredged material is deposited at 
    the facility and who enter into agreements with the non-Federal 
    interest for the use of the facility. The amount of such fees may 
    be determined by the non-Federal interest.
    (b) Non-Federal Use of Disposal Facilities.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary--
            (A) may permit the use of any dredged material disposal 
        facility under the jurisdiction of, or managed by, the 
        Secretary by a non-Federal interest if the Secretary determines 
        that such use will not reduce the availability of the facility 
        for project purposes; and
            (B) may impose fees to recover capital, operation, and 
        maintenance costs associated with such use.
        (2) Use of fees.--Notwithstanding section 401(c) of the Federal 
    Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1341(c)) but subject to 
    advance appropriations, any monies received through collection of 
    fees under this subsection shall be available to the Secretary, and 
    shall be used by the Secretary, for the operation and maintenance 
    of the disposal facility from which the fees were collected.
    (c) Public-Private Partnerships.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may carry out a program to 
    evaluate and implement opportunities for public-private 
    partnerships in the design, construction, management, or operation 
    of dredged material disposal facilities in connection with 
    construction or maintenance of Federal navigation projects. If a 
    non-Federal interest is a sponsor of the project, the Secretary 
    shall consult with the non-Federal interest in carrying out the 
    program with respect to the project.
        (2) Private financing.--
            (A) Agreements.--In carrying out this subsection, the 
        Secretary may enter into an agreement with a non-Federal 
        interest with respect to a project, a private entity, or both 
        for the acquisition, design, construction, management, or 
        operation of a dredged material disposal facility (including 
        any facility used to demonstrate potential beneficial uses of 
        dredged material) using funds provided in whole or in part by 
        the private entity.
            (B) Reimbursement.--If any funds provided by a private 
        entity are used to carry out a project under this subsection, 
        the Secretary may reimburse the private entity over a period of 
        time agreed to by the parties to the agreement through the 
        payment of subsequent user fees. Such fees may include the 
        payment of a disposal or tipping fee for placement of suitable 
        dredged material at the facility.
            (C) Amount of fees.--User fees paid pursuant to 
        subparagraph (B) shall be sufficient to repay funds contributed 
        by the private entity plus a reasonable return on investment 
        approved by the Secretary in cooperation with the non-Federal 
        interest with respect to the project and the private entity.
            (D) Federal share.--The Federal share of such fees shall be 
        equal to the percentage of the total cost that would otherwise 
        be borne by the Federal Government as required pursuant to 
        existing cost-sharing requirements, including section 103 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) 
        and section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
        (33 U.S.C. 2325).
            (E) Budget act compliance.--Any spending authority (as 
        defined in section 401(c)(2) of the Congressional Budget Act of 
        1974 (2 U.S.C. 651(c)(2))) authorized by this section shall be 
        effective only to such extent and in such amounts as are 
        provided in appropriation Acts.

SEC. 218. OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Penalty.--Section 16 of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
approved March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 411; 30 Stat. 1153), is amended--
        (1) by striking ``thirteen, fourteen, and fifteen'' each place 
    it appears and inserting ``13, 14, 15, 19, and 20''; and
        (2) by striking ``not exceeding twenty-five hundred dollars nor 
    less than five hundred dollars'' and inserting ``of up to $25,000 
    per day''.
    (b) General Authority.--Section 20 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 415) is 
amended--
        (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``expense'' the 1st place it 
    appears and inserting ``actual expense, including administrative 
    expenses,'';
        (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``cost'' and inserting 
    ``actual cost, including administrative costs,'';
        (3) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
        (4) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Removal Requirement.--Not later than 24 hours after the 
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating 
issues an order to stop or delay navigation in any navigable waters of 
the United States because of conditions related to the sinking or 
grounding of a vessel, the owner or operator of the vessel, with the 
approval of the Secretary of the Army, shall begin removal of the 
vessel using the most expeditious removal method available or, if 
appropriate, secure the vessel pending removal to allow navigation to 
resume. If the owner or operator fails to begin removal or to secure 
the vessel pending removal or fails to complete removal on an expedited 
basis, the Secretary of the Army shall remove or destroy the vessel 
using the summary removal procedures under subsection (a).''.

SEC. 219. SMALL PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Section 14 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works on 
rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved July 24, 1946 
(33 U.S.C. 701r), is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$12,500,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000''; 
    and
        (2) by striking ``$500,000'' and inserting ``$1,000,000''.

SEC. 220. UNECONOMICAL COST-SHARING REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 221(a) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-
5b(a)) is amended by striking the period at the end of the 1st sentence 
and inserting the following: ``; except that no such agreement shall be 
required if the Secretary determines that the administrative costs 
associated with negotiating, executing, or administering the agreement 
would exceed the amount of the contribution required from the non-
Federal interest and are less than $25,000.''.

SEC. 221. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES.

    Section 22 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-16) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``, watersheds, or 
    ecosystems'' after ``basins'';
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) by striking paragraph (2); and
            (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and (4) as paragraphs 
        (2) and (3), respectively; and
        (3) in subsection (c)--
            (A) by striking ``$6,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$10,000,000''; and
            (B) by striking ``$300,000'' and inserting ``$500,000''.

SEC. 222. CORPS OF ENGINEERS EXPENSES.

    Section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (33 U.S.C. 701u; 64 
Stat. 183) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``continental limits of the''; and
        (2) by striking the 2d colon and all that follows through ``for 
    this purpose''.

SEC. 223. STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCY REVIEW PERIOD.

    Paragraph (a) of the 1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and other purposes'', approved December 22, 
1944 (33 U.S.C. 701-1(a); 58 Stat. 888), is amended--
        (1) by striking ``Within ninety'' and inserting ``Within 30''; 
    and
        (2) by striking ``ninety-day period.'' and inserting ``30-day 
    period.''.

SEC. 224. SECTION 215 REIMBURSEMENT LIMITATION PER PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--The last sentence of section 215(a) of the Flood 
Control Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5a(a)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting ``$5,000,000''; 
    and
        (2) by striking the final period.
    (b) Modification of Reimbursement Limitation for San Antonio River 
Authority.--Notwithstanding the last sentence of section 215(a) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5a(a)) and the agreement 
executed on November 7, 1992, by the Secretary and the San Antonio 
River Authority, Texas, the Secretary shall reimburse the Authority an 
amount not to exceed a total of $5,000,000 for the work carried out by 
the Authority under the agreement, including any amounts paid to the 
Authority under the terms of the agreement before the date of the 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 225. MELALEUCA.

    Section 104(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 
610(a)) is amended by inserting ``melaleuca,'' after ``milfoil,''.

SEC. 226. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Project Purpose.--Section 405(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2239 note; 106 Stat. 4863) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(3) Project purpose.--The purpose of the project to be 
    carried out under this section is to provide for the development of 
    1 or more sediment decontamination technologies on a pilot scale 
    demonstrating a capacity of at least 500,000 cubic yards per 
    year.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--The 1st sentence of section 
405(c) of such Act is amended to read as follows: ``There is authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.''.
    (c) Reports.--Section 405 of such Act is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(d) Reports.--Not later than September 30, 1998, and periodically 
thereafter, the Administrator and the Secretary shall transmit to 
Congress a report on the results of the project to be carried out under 
this section, including an assessment of the progress made in achieving 
the purpose of the project set forth in subsection (a)(3).''.

SEC. 227. SHORE PROTECTION.

    (a) Declaration of Policy.--Subsection (a) of the 1st section of 
the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost 
of protecting the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 
13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426e), is amended--
        (1) by striking ``damage to the shores'' and inserting ``damage 
    to the shores and beaches''; and
        (2) by striking ``the following provisions'' and all that 
    follows through the period at the end of such subsection and 
    inserting the following: ``this Act, to promote shore protection 
    projects and related research that encourage the protection, 
    restoration, and enhancement of sandy beaches, including beach 
    restoration and periodic beach nourishment, on a comprehensive and 
    coordinated basis by the Federal Government, States, localities, 
    and private enterprises. In carrying out this policy, preference 
    shall be given to areas in which there has been a Federal 
    investment of funds and areas with respect to which the need for 
    prevention or mitigation of damage to shores and beaches is 
    attributable to Federal navigation projects or other Federal 
    activities.''.
    (b) Authorization of Projects.--Subsection (e) of such section is 
amended--
        (1) by striking ``(e) No'' and inserting the following:
    ``(e) Authorization of Projects.--
        ``(1) In general.--No'';
        (2) by moving the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) (as 
    designated by paragraph (1) of this subsection) 2 ems to the right; 
    and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Studies.--
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall--
                ``(i) recommend to Congress studies concerning shore 
            protection projects that meet the criteria established 
            under this Act (including subparagraph (B)(iii)) and other 
            applicable law;
                ``(ii) conduct such studies as Congress requires under 
            applicable laws; and
                ``(iii) report the results of the studies to the 
            Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and 
            the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
            House of Representatives.
            ``(B) Recommendations for shore protection projects.--
                ``(i) In general.--The Secretary shall recommend to 
            Congress the authorization or reauthorization of shore 
            protection projects based on the studies conducted under 
            subparagraph (A).
                ``(ii) Considerations.--In making recommendations, the 
            Secretary shall consider the economic and ecological 
            benefits of the shore protection project.
            ``(C) Coordination of projects.--In conducting studies and 
        making recommendations for a shore protection project under 
        this paragraph, the Secretary shall--
                ``(i) determine whether there is any other project 
            being carried out by the Secretary or the head of another 
            Federal agency that may be complementary to the shore 
            protection project; and
                ``(ii) if there is such a complementary project, 
            describe the efforts that will be made to coordinate the 
            projects.
        ``(3) Shore protection projects.--
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary shall construct, or cause 
        to be constructed, any shore protection project authorized by 
        Congress, or separable element of such a project, for which 
        funds have been appropriated by Congress.
            ``(B) Agreements.--
                ``(i) Requirement.--After authorization by Congress, 
            and before commencement of construction, of a shore 
            protection project or separable element, the Secretary 
            shall enter into a written agreement with a non-Federal 
            interest with respect to the project or separable element.
                ``(ii) Terms.--The agreement shall--

                    ``(I) specify the life of the project; and
                    ``(II) ensure that the Federal Government and the 
                non-Federal interest will cooperate in carrying out the 
                project or separable element.

            ``(C) Coordination of projects.--In constructing a shore 
        protection project or separable element under this paragraph, 
        the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, coordinate the 
        project or element with any complementary project identified 
        under paragraph (2)(C).''.
    (c) Requirement of Agreements Prior to Reimbursements.--
        (1) Small shore protection projects.--Section 2 of the Act 
    entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal participation in the cost of 
    protecting the shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 
    13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426f), is amended--
            (A) by striking ``Sec. 2. The Secretary of the Army'' and 
        inserting the following:

``SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENTS.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary'';
            (B) in subsection (a) (as designated by subparagraph (A) of 
        this paragraph)--
                (i) by striking ``local interests'' and inserting 
            ``non-Federal interests'';
                (ii) by inserting ``or separable element of the 
            project'' after ``project''; and
                (iii) by inserting ``or separable elements'' after 
            ``projects'' each place it appears; and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Agreements.--
        ``(1) Requirement.--After authorization of reimbursement by the 
    Secretary under this section, and before commencement of 
    construction, of a shore protection project, the Secretary shall 
    enter into a written agreement with the non-Federal interest with 
    respect to the project or separable element.
        ``(2) Terms.--The agreement shall--
            ``(A) specify the life of the project; and
            ``(B) ensure that the Federal Government and the non-
        Federal interest will cooperate in carrying out the project or 
        separable element.''.
        (2) Other shoreline protection projects.--Section 206(e)(1)(A) 
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-
    1(e)(1)(A); 106 Stat. 4829) is amended by inserting before the 
    semicolon the following: ``and enters into a written agreement with 
    the non-Federal interest with respect to the project or separable 
    element (including the terms of cooperation)''.
    (d) State and Regional Plans.--The Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores 
of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946, is amended--
        (1) by redesignating section 4 (33 U.S.C. 426h) as section 5; 
    and
        (2) by inserting after section 3 (33 U.S.C. 426g) the 
    following:

``SEC. 4. STATE AND REGIONAL PLANS.

    ``The Secretary may--
        ``(1) cooperate with any State in the preparation of a 
    comprehensive State or regional plan for the conservation of 
    coastal resources located within the boundaries of the State;
        ``(2) encourage State participation in the implementation of 
    the plan; and
        ``(3) submit to Congress reports and recommendations with 
    respect to appropriate Federal participation in carrying out the 
    plan.''.
    (e) National Shoreline Erosion Control Development and 
Demonstration Program and Definitions.--
        (1) In general.--The Act entitled ``An Act authorizing Federal 
    participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
    owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426e et 
    seq.), is amended by striking section 5 (as redesignated by 
    subsection (d)(1) of this section) and inserting the following:

``SEC. 5. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    ``(a) Establishment of Erosion Control Program.--The Secretary 
shall establish and conduct a national shoreline erosion control 
development and demonstration program for a period of 6 years beginning 
on the date that funds are made available to carry out this section.
    ``(b) Requirements.--
        ``(1) In general.--The erosion control program shall include 
    provisions for--
            ``(A) projects consisting of planning, designing, and 
        constructing prototype engineered and vegetative shoreline 
        erosion control devices and methods during the first 3 years of 
        the erosion control program;
            ``(B) adequate monitoring of the prototypes throughout the 
        duration of the erosion control program;
            ``(C) detailed engineering and environmental reports on the 
        results of each demonstration project carried out under the 
        erosion control program; and
            ``(D) technology transfers to private property owners and 
        State and local entities.
        ``(2) Emphasis.--The projects carried out under the erosion 
    control program shall emphasize, to the extent practicable--
            ``(A) the development and demonstration of innovative 
        technologies;
            ``(B) efficient designs to prevent erosion at a shoreline 
        site, taking into account the life-cycle cost of the design, 
        including cleanup, maintenance, and amortization;
            ``(C) natural designs, including the use of vegetation or 
        temporary structures that minimize permanent structural 
        alterations;
            ``(D) the avoidance of negative impacts to adjacent 
        shorefront communities;
            ``(E) in areas with substantial residential or commercial 
        interests adjacent to the shoreline, designs that do not impair 
        the aesthetic appeal of the interests;
            ``(F) the potential for long-term protection afforded by 
        the technology; and
            ``(G) recommendations developed from evaluations of the 
        original 1974 program established under the Shoreline Erosion 
        Control Demonstration Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5 note; 88 
        Stat. 26), including--
                ``(i) adequate consideration of the subgrade;
                ``(ii) proper filtration;
                ``(iii) durable components;
                ``(iv) adequate connection between units; and
                ``(v) consideration of additional relevant information.
        ``(3) Sites.--
            ``(A) In general.--Each project under the erosion control 
        program shall be carried out at a privately owned site with 
        substantial public access, or a publicly owned site, on open 
        coast or on tidal waters.
            ``(B) Selection.--The Secretary shall develop criteria for 
        the selection of sites for the projects, including--
                ``(i) a variety of geographical and climatic 
            conditions;
                ``(ii) the size of the population that is dependent on 
            the beaches for recreation, protection of homes, or 
            commercial interests;
                ``(iii) the rate of erosion;
                ``(iv) significant natural resources or habitats and 
            environmentally sensitive areas; and
                ``(v) significant threatened historic structures or 
            landmarks.
            ``(C) Areas.--Projects under the erosion control program 
        shall be carried out at not fewer than--
                ``(i) 2 sites on each of the shorelines of the Atlantic 
            and Pacific coasts;
                ``(ii) 2 sites on the shoreline of the Great Lakes; and
                ``(iii) 1 site on the shoreline of the Gulf of Mexico.
        ``(4) Determination of feasibility.--Implementation of a 
    project under this section is contingent upon a determination by 
    the Secretary that such project is feasible.
    ``(c) Consultation.--
        ``(1) Parties.--The Secretary shall carry out the erosion 
    control program in consultation with--
            ``(A) the Secretary of Agriculture, particularly with 
        respect to vegetative means of preventing and controlling 
        shoreline erosion;
            ``(B) Federal, State, and local agencies;
            ``(C) private organizations;
            ``(D) the Coastal Engineering Research Center established 
        under the 1st section of the Act entitled `An Act to make 
        certain changes in the functions of the Beach Erosion Board and 
        the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, and for other 
        purposes', approved November 7, 1963 (33 U.S.C. 426-1); and
            ``(E) university research facilities.
        ``(2) Agreements.--The consultation described in paragraph (1) 
    may include entering into agreements with other Federal, State, or 
    local agencies or private organizations to carry out functions 
    described in subsection (b)(1) when appropriate.
    ``(d) Report.--Not later than 60 days after the conclusion of the 
erosion control program, the Secretary shall prepare and submit an 
erosion control program final report to the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives. The report shall 
include a comprehensive evaluation of the erosion control program and 
recommendations regarding the continuation of the erosion control 
program.
    ``(e) Funding.--
        ``(1) Responsibility.--The cost of and responsibility for 
    operation and maintenance (excluding monitoring) of a demonstration 
    project under the erosion control program shall be borne by non-
    Federal interests on completion of construction of the 
    demonstration project.
        ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
    be appropriated $21,000,000 to carry out this section.

``SEC. 6. DEFINITIONS.

    ``In this Act, the following definitions apply:
        ``(1) Erosion control program.--The term `erosion control 
    program' means the national shoreline erosion control development 
    and demonstration program established under this section.
        ``(2) Secretary.--The term `Secretary' means the Secretary of 
    the Army.
        ``(3) Separable element.--The term `separable element' has the 
    meaning provided by section 103(f) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(f)).
        ``(4) Shore.--The term `shore' includes each shoreline of the 
    Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, the Gulf of Mexico, the Great Lakes, 
    and lakes, estuaries, and bays directly connected therewith.
        ``(5) Shore protection project.--The term `shore protection 
    project' includes a project for beach nourishment, including the 
    replacement of sand.''.
        (2) Conforming amendments.--The Act entitled ``An Act 
    authorizing Federal participation in the cost of protecting the 
    shores of publicly owned property'', approved August 13, 1946, is 
    amended--
            (A) in subsection (b)(3) of the 1st section (33 U.S.C. 
        426e(b)(3))--
                (i) by striking ``of the Army, acting through the Chief 
            of Engineers,''; and
                (ii) by striking the final period;
            (B) in subsection (e) of the 1st section by striking 
        ``section 3'' and inserting ``section 3 or 5''; and
            (C) in section 3 (33 U.S.C. 426g) by striking ``Secretary 
        of the Army'' and inserting ``Secretary''.
    (f) Objectives of Projects.--Section 209 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2; 84 Stat. 1829) is amended by inserting 
``(including shore protection projects such as projects for beach 
nourishment, including the replacement of sand)'' after ``water 
resource projects''.

SEC. 228. CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2); 100 Stat. 4201) is 
amended--
        (1) in the 1st sentence by striking ``10'' and inserting ``7'';
        (2) in the 2d sentence by striking ``Before'' and inserting 
    ``Upon''; and
        (3) in the last sentence by inserting ``the planning, design, 
    or'' before ``construction''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 52 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4044) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (a) (33 U.S.C. 579a note);
        (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as subsections 
    (a) through (d), respectively; and
        (3) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated) by striking ``or 
    subsection (a) of this section''.

SEC. 229. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    (a) General Authority.--In carrying out research and development in 
support of the civil works program of the Department of the Army, the 
Secretary may utilize contracts, cooperative research and development 
agreements, cooperative agreements, and grants with non-Federal 
entities, including State and local governments, colleges and 
universities, consortia, professional and technical societies, public 
and private scientific and technical foundations, research 
institutions, educational organizations, and nonprofit organizations.
    (b) Commercial Application.--With respect to contracts for research 
and development, the Secretary may include requirements that have 
potential commercial application and may use such potential application 
as an evaluation factor where appropriate.

SEC. 230. BENEFITS TO NAVIGATION.

    In evaluating potential improvements to navigation and the 
maintenance of navigation projects, the Secretary shall consider, and 
include for purposes of project justification, economic benefits 
generated by cruise ships as commercial navigation benefits.

SEC. 231. LOSS OF LIFE PREVENTION.

    Section 904 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2281; 100 Stat. 4185) is amended by inserting ``and information 
regarding potential loss of human life that may be associated with 
flooding and coastal storm events,'' after ``unquantifiable,''.

SEC. 232. SCENIC AND AESTHETIC CONSIDERATIONS.

    In conducting studies of potential water resources projects, the 
Secretary shall consider measures to preserve and enhance scenic and 
aesthetic qualities in the vicinity of such projects.

SEC. 233. TERMINATION OF TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

    Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 2319; 104 Stat. 4639) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (a); and
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) by striking ``(b) Public Participation.--''; and
            (B) by striking ``subsection'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``section''.

SEC. 234. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities in support 
of other Federal agencies or international organizations to address 
problems of national significance to the United States.
    (b) Consultation.--The Secretary may engage in activities in 
support of international organizations only after consulting with the 
Secretary of State.
    (c) Use of Corps' Expertise.--The Secretary may use the technical 
and managerial expertise of the Corps of Engineers to address domestic 
and international problems related to water resources, infrastructure 
development, and environmental protection.
    (d) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to 
carry out this section. The Secretary may accept and expend additional 
funds from other Federal agencies or international organizations to 
carry this section.

SEC. 235. SENSE OF CONGRESS; REQUIREMENT REGARDING NOTICE.

    (a) Purchase of American-Made Equipment and Products.--It is the 
sense of Congress that, to the greatest extent practicable, all 
equipment and products purchased with funds made available under this 
Act should be American-made.
    (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing financial 
assistance under this Act, the Secretary, to the greatest extent 
practicable, shall provide to each recipient of the assistance a notice 
describing the statement made in subsection (a).

SEC. 236. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

    (a) Contributions for Environmental and Recreation Projects.--
Section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2325(b); 106 Stat. 4826) is amended by striking ``(8662)'' and 
inserting ``(8862)''.
    (b) Challenge Cost-Sharing Program.--The 2d sentence of section 
225(c) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 2328(c); 106 Stat. 4838) is amended by 
striking ``(8662)'' and inserting ``(8862)''.

SEC. 237. HOPPER DREDGES.

    Section 3 of the Act of August 11, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 622; 25 Stat. 
423), is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Program To Increase Use of Private Hopper Dredges.--
        ``(1) Initiation.--The Secretary shall initiate a program to 
    increase the use of private-industry hopper dredges for the 
    construction and maintenance of Federal navigation channels.
        ``(2) Ready reserve status for hopper dredge wheeler.--In order 
    to carry out this subsection, the Secretary shall place the Federal 
    hopper dredge Wheeler in a ready reserve status not later than the 
    earlier of 90 days after the date of completion of the 
    rehabilitation of the hopper dredge McFarland pursuant to section 
    563 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 or October 1, 
    1997.
        ``(3) Testing and use of ready reserve hopper dredge.--The 
    Secretary may periodically perform routine tests of the equipment 
    of the vessel placed in a ready reserve status under paragraph (2) 
    to ensure the vessel's ability to perform emergency work. The 
    Secretary shall not assign any scheduled hopper dredging work to 
    such vessel but shall perform any repairs needed to maintain the 
    vessel in a fully operational condition. The Secretary may place 
    the vessel in active status in order to perform any dredging work 
    only if the Secretary determines that private industry has failed 
    to submit a responsive and responsible bid for work advertised by 
    the Secretary or to carry out the project as required pursuant to a 
    contract with the Secretary.
        ``(4) Repair and rehabilitation.--The Secretary may undertake 
    any repair and rehabilitation of any Federal hopper dredge, 
    including the vessel placed in ready reserve status under paragraph 
    (2) to allow the vessel to be placed in active status as provided 
    in paragraph (3).
        ``(5) Procedures.--The Secretary shall develop and implement 
    procedures to ensure that, to the maximum extent practicable, 
    private industry hopper dredge capacity is available to meet both 
    routine and time-sensitive dredging needs. Such procedures shall 
    include--
            ``(A) scheduling of contract solicitations to effectively 
        distribute dredging work throughout the dredging season; and
            ``(B) use of expedited contracting procedures to allow 
        dredges performing routine work to be made available to meet 
        time-sensitive, urgent, or emergency dredging needs.
        ``(6) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the 
    enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall report to 
    Congress on whether the vessel placed in ready reserve status under 
    paragraph (2) is needed to be returned to active status or 
    continued in a ready reserve status or whether another Federal 
    hopper dredge should be placed in a ready reserve status.
        ``(7) Limitations.--
            ``(A) Reductions in status.--The Secretary may not further 
        reduce the readiness status of any Federal hopper dredge below 
        a ready reserve status except any vessel placed in such status 
        for not less than 5 years that the Secretary determines has not 
        been used sufficiently to justify retaining the vessel in such 
        status.
            ``(B) Increase in assignments of dredging work.--For each 
        fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall not assign any greater quantity 
        of dredging work to any Federal hopper dredge in active status 
        than was assigned to that vessel in the average of the 3 prior 
        fiscal years.
            ``(C) Remaining dredges.--In carrying out the program under 
        this section, the Secretary shall not reduce the availability 
        and utilization of Federal hopper dredge vessels stationed on 
        the Pacific and Atlantic coasts below that which occurred in 
        fiscal year 1996 to meet the navigation dredging needs of the 
        ports on those coasts.
        ``(8) Contracts; payment of capital costs.--The Secretary may 
    enter into a contract for the maintenance and crewing of any 
    Federal hopper dredge retained in a ready reserve status. The 
    capital costs (including depreciation costs) of any dredge retained 
    in such status shall be paid for out of funds made available from 
    the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund and shall not be charged against 
    the Corps of Engineers' Revolving Fund Account or any individual 
    project cost unless the dredge is specifically used in connection 
    with that project.''.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

    (a) Projects With Reports.--
        (1) San francisco river at clifton, arizona.--The project for 
    flood control, San Francisco River at Clifton, Arizona, authorized 
    by section 101(a)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
    (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
    construct the project substantially in accordance with the report 
    of the Corps of Engineers dated May 28, 1996, at a total cost of 
    $21,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,800,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $7,300,000.
        (2) Oakland harbor, california.--The projects for navigation, 
    Oakland Outer Harbor, California, and Oakland Inner Harbor, 
    California, authorized by section 202 of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), are modified to direct 
    the Secretary--
            (A) to combine the 2 projects into 1 project, to be 
        designated as the Oakland Harbor, California, project; and
            (B) to carry out the combined project substantially in 
        accordance with the plans and subject to the conditions 
        recommended in the report of the Corps of Engineers dated July 
        15, 1994, at a total cost of $90,850,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $59,150,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $31,700,000.
    The non-Federal share of project costs and any available credits 
    toward the non-Federal share shall be calculated on the basis of 
    the total cost of the combined project.
        (3) San luis rey, california.--The project for flood control of 
    the San Luis Rey River, California, authorized pursuant to section 
    201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5; 79 Stat. 
    1073-1074), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
    project substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
    Engineers dated May 23, 1996, at a total cost of $81,600,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $61,100,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $20,500,000.
        (4) Potomac river, washington, district of columbia.--The 
    project for flood control, Potomac River, Washington, District of 
    Columbia, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
    authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
    harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved June 
    22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1574), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
    construct the project substantially in accordance with the General 
    Design Memorandum dated May 1992 at a Federal cost of $1,800,000; 
    except that a temporary closure may be used instead of a permanent 
    structure at 17th Street. Operation and maintenance of the project 
    shall be a Federal responsibility.
        (5) North branch of chicago river, illinois.--The project for 
    flood control, North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, 
    authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 
    of 1986 (100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the Secretary--
            (A) to carry out the project substantially in accordance 
        with the report of the Corps of Engineers dated May 26, 1994, 
        at a total cost of $34,228,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $20,905,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $13,323,000; and
            (B) to reimburse the city of Deerfield, Illinois, an amount 
        not to exceed $38,500 for a flood control study financed by the 
        city if the Secretary determines that the study is necessary to 
        address residual damages in areas upstream of Reservoir 29A.
        (6) Halstead, kansas.--The project for flood control, Halstead, 
    Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4116), is modified to authorize 
    the Secretary to carry out the project substantially in accordance 
    with the report of the Corps of Engineers dated March 19, 1993, at 
    a total cost of $11,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $8,325,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,775,000.
        (7) Cape girardeau, missouri.--The project for flood control, 
    Cape Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan Area, Missouri, authorized by 
    section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
    Stat. 4118-4119), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
    construct the project substantially in accordance with the report 
    of the Corps of Engineers dated July 18, 1994, including 
    implementation of nonstructural measures, at a total cost of 
    $45,414,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $33,030,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $12,384,000.
        (8) Molly ann's brook, new jersey.--The project for flood 
    control, Molly Ann's Brook, New Jersey, authorized by section 
    401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
    4119), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
    project substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
    Engineers dated April 3, 1996, at a total cost of $40,100,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $22,600,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $17,500,000.
        (9) Ramapo river at oakland, new jersey.--The project for flood 
    control, Ramapo River at Oakland, New Jersey, authorized by section 
    401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
    4120), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
    project substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
    Engineers dated May 1994, at a total cost of $11,300,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $8,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $2,800,000.
        (10) Wilmington harbor-northeast cape fear river, north 
    carolina.--The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor-Northeast 
    Cape Fear River, North Carolina, authorized by section 202(a) of 
    the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4095), is 
    modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
    substantially in accordance with the General Design Memorandum 
    dated April 1990 and the General Design Memorandum Supplement dated 
    February 1994, at a total cost of $52,041,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $25,729,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $26,312,000.
        (11) Saw mill run, pennsylvania.--The project for flood 
    control, Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, authorized by 
    section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
    Stat. 4124), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out 
    the project substantially in accordance with the report of the 
    Corps of Engineers dated April 8, 1994, at a total cost of 
    $12,780,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,585,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $3,195,000.
        (12) San juan harbor, puerto rico.--The project for navigation, 
    San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico, authorized by section 202(a) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4097), is 
    modified to authorize the Secretary to deepen the bar channel to 
    depths varying from 49 feet to 56 feet below mean low water with 
    other modifications to authorized interior channels as described in 
    the General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment dated 
    March 1994, at a total cost of $45,085,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $28,244,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $16,841,000.
        (13) India point railroad bridge, seekonk river, providence, 
    rhode island.--The project for navigation, India Point Railroad 
    Bridge, Seekonk River, Providence, Rhode Island, authorized by 
    section 1166(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
    Stat. 4258), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct 
    the project substantially in accordance with the Post Authorization 
    Change Report dated August 1994 at a total cost of $1,300,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $650,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $650,000.
        (14) Upper jordan river, utah.--The project for flood control, 
    Upper Jordan River, Utah, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610), is 
    modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project 
    substantially in accordance with the General Design Memorandum for 
    the project dated March 1994, and the Post Authorization Change 
    Report for the project dated April 1994, at a total cost of 
    $12,870,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,580,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $4,290,000.
    (b) Projects Subject to Reports.--The following projects are 
modified as follows, except that no funds may be obligated to carry out 
work under such modifications until completion of a report by the Corps 
of Engineers finding that such work is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economic, as applicable:
        (1) Alamo dam, arizona.--The project for flood control and 
    other purposes, Alamo Dam and Lake, Arizona, authorized by section 
    10 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of 
    certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
    for other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 900), is 
    modified to authorize the Secretary to operate the Alamo Dam to 
    provide fish and wildlife benefits both upstream and downstream of 
    the Dam. Such operation shall not reduce flood control and 
    recreation benefits provided by the project.
        (2) Phoenix, arizona.--The project for flood control and water 
    quality improvement, Phoenix, Arizona, authorized by section 321 of 
    the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4848), is 
    modified--
            (A) to make ecosystem restoration a project purpose; and
            (B) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
        a total cost of $17,500,000.
        (3) Glenn-colusa, california.--The project for flood control, 
    Sacramento River, California, authorized by section 2 of the Act 
    entitled ``An Act to provide for the control of the floods of the 
    Mississippi River and of the Sacramento River, California, and for 
    other purposes'', approved March 1, 1917 (39 Stat. 949), and 
    modified by section 102 of the Energy and Water Development 
    Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), is further modified to 
    authorize the Secretary to carry out the portion of the project at 
    Glenn-Colusa, California, at a total cost of $14,200,000.
        (4) Tybee island, georgia.--The project for beach erosion 
    control, Tybee Island, Georgia, authorized pursuant to section 201 
    of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5; 79 Stat. 1073-
    1074), is modified to include as an integral part of the project 
    the portion of Tybee Island located south of the existing south 
    terminal groin between 18th and 19th Streets, including the east 
    bank of Tybee Creek up to Horse Pen Creek.
        (5) Comite river, louisiana.--The Comite River Diversion 
    project for flood control, authorized as part of the project for 
    flood control, Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, by section 
    101(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
    4802-4803), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
    project at a total cost of $121,600,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $70,577,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $51,023,000.
        (6) Grand isle and vicinity, louisiana.--The project for 
    hurricane damage prevention, flood control, and beach erosion along 
    Grand Isle and Vicinity, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of 
    the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified to 
    authorize the Secretary to construct a permanent breakwater and 
    levee system at a total cost of $17,000,000.
        (7) Red river waterway, louisiana.--The project for mitigation 
    of fish and wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, Louisiana, 
    authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 
    of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by section 102(p) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4613), is 
    further modified--
            (A) to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project at 
        a total cost of $10,500,000; and
            (B) to provide that lands that are purchased adjacent to 
        the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area may be located in 
        Caddo Parish or Red River Parish.
        (8) Red river waterway, mississippi river to shreveport, 
    louisiana.--The project for navigation, Red River Waterway, 
    Mississippi River to Shreveport, Louisiana, authorized by section 
    101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is modified 
    to require the Secretary to dredge and perform other related work 
    as required to reestablish and maintain access to, and the 
    environmental value of, the bendway channels designated for 
    preservation in project documentation prepared before the date of 
    the enactment of this Act. The work shall be carried out in 
    accordance with the local cooperation requirements for other 
    navigation features of the project.
        (9) Stillwater, minnesota.--The project for flood control, 
    Stillwater, Minnesota, authorized by section 363 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4861-4862), is 
    modified--
            (A) to authorize the Secretary to expand the flood wall 
        system if the Secretary determines that the expansion is 
        feasible; and
            (B) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
        a total cost of $11,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $8,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,900,000.
        (10) Joseph g. minish passaic river park, new jersey.--The 
    streambank restoration element of the project for flood control, 
    Passaic River Main Stem, New Jersey and New York, authorized by 
    section 101(a)(18)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
    1990 (104 Stat. 4608) and known as the ``Joseph G. Minish Passaic 
    River Waterfront Park and Historic Area, New Jersey'', is 
    modified--
            (A) to authorize the Secretary to construct such element at 
        a total cost of $75,000,000;
            (B) to provide that construction of such element may be 
        undertaken before implementation of the remainder of the 
        Passaic River Main Stem project; and
            (C) to provide that such element shall be treated, for the 
        purpose of economic analysis, as an integral part of the 
        Passaic River Main Stem project and shall be completed in the 
        initial phase of the Passaic River Main Stem project.
        (11) Arthur kill, new york and new jersey.--The project for 
    navigation, Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey, authorized by 
    section 202(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
    Stat. 4098), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out 
    the project to a depth of not to exceed 45 feet, at a total cost of 
    $83,000,000.
        (12) Kill van kull, new york and new jersey.--
            (A) Cost increase.--The project for navigation, Kill Van 
        Kull, New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 202(a) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4095), 
        is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project 
        at a total cost of $750,000,000.
            (B) Continuation of engineering and design.--The Secretary 
        shall continue engineering and design in order to complete the 
        navigation project at Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, 
        New York and New Jersey, authorized by chapter IV of title I of 
        the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 313) and 
        section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 4095).

SEC. 302. MOBILE HARBOR, ALABAMA.

    The undesignated paragraph under the heading ``mobile harbor, 
alabama'' in section 201(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4090) is amended by striking the 1st semicolon and all 
that follows and inserting a period and the following: ``In disposing 
of dredged material from such project, the Secretary, after compliance 
with applicable laws and after opportunity for public review and 
comment, may consider alternatives to disposal of such material in the 
Gulf of Mexico, including environmentally acceptable alternatives for 
beneficial uses of dredged material and environmental restoration.''.

SEC. 303. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and tributaries, 
Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to permit the non-Federal contribution for the project to be 
determined in accordance with subsections (k) and (m) of section 103 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213) and to 
direct the Secretary to enter into negotiations with non-Federal 
interests pursuant to section 103(l) of such Act concerning the timing 
of the initial payment of the non-Federal contribution.

SEC. 304. WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control and power generation at White River 
Basin, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 4 of the Act 
entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works 
on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', 
approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218), shall include recreation and 
fish and wildlife mitigation as purposes of the project, to the extent 
that the additional purposes do not adversely affect flood control, 
power generation, or other authorized purposes of the project.

SEC. 305. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation and shore protection, Channel Islands 
Harbor, Port of Hueneme, California, authorized by section 101 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1252), is modified to authorize 
biennial dredging and sand bypassing at an annual downcoast 
replenishment rate to establish and maintain a littoral sediment 
balance which is estimated at 1,254,000 cubic yards per year. The cost 
of such dredging and sand bypassing shall be 100 percent Federal as 
long as Federal ownership of the entrance channel and jetties of the 
Port of Hueneme necessitates restoration and maintenance of the 
downcoast shoreline.

SEC. 306. LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project for flood control, Lake 
Elsinore, Riverside County, California, shall be $7,500,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in such project pursuant to subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project referred 
to in subsection (a) under the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.
    (d) Study.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
        (1) conduct a study of the advisability of modifying, for the 
    purpose of flood control pursuant to section 205 of the Flood 
    Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the project for flood 
    control, Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California, to permit 
    water conservation storage up to an elevation of 1,249 feet above 
    mean sea level; and
        (2) report to Congress on the study, including making 
    recommendations concerning the advisability of so modifying the 
    project.

SEC. 307. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, SAN PEDRO BAY, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, San 
Pedro Bay, California, authorized by section 201(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4091), is modified to 
provide that, for the purpose of section 101(a)(2) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 2211(a)(2)), the sewer outfall relocated over a distance of 
4,458 feet by the Port of Los Angeles at a cost of approximately 
$12,000,000 shall be considered to be a relocation. The cost of such 
relocation shall be credited as a payment provided by the non-Federal 
interest.

SEC. 308. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CALIFORNIA.

    The non-Federal share for a project to add water conservation to 
the existing Los Angeles County Drainage Area, California, project, 
authorized by section 101(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 4611), shall be 100 percent of separable first costs 
and separable operation, maintenance, and replacement costs associated 
with the water conservation purpose.

SEC. 309. PRADO DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Review.--
        (1) Separable element determination.--Not later than 6 months 
    after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
    review, in cooperation with the non-Federal interest, the Prado Dam 
    feature of the project for flood control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, 
    California, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113), with a view toward 
    determining whether the feature may be considered a separable 
    element (as defined in section 103(f) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
    2213(f))).
        (2) Modification of cost-sharing requirement.--If the Prado Dam 
    feature is determined to be a separable element under this 
    subsection, the Secretary shall reduce the non-Federal cost-sharing 
    requirement for such feature in accordance with section 103(a)(3) 
    of such Act and shall enter into a project cooperation agreement 
    with the non-Federal interest to reflect the modified cost-sharing 
    requirement and to carry out construction.
    (b) Safety Improvements.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
State of California, shall provide technical assistance to Orange 
County, California, in developing appropriate public safety and access 
improvements associated with that portion of California State Route 71 
being relocated for the Prado Dam feature of the project authorized as 
part of the project referred to in subsection (a)(1).

SEC. 310. QUEENSWAY BAY, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 4(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4016) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``In 
addition, the Secretary shall perform advance maintenance dredging in 
the Queensway Bay Channel, California, at a total cost of $5,000,000. 
The Secretary shall coordinate with Federal and State agencies the 
establishment of suitable dredged material disposal areas.''.

SEC. 311. SEVEN OAKS DAM, CALIFORNIA.

    The non-Federal share for a project to add water conservation to 
the Seven Oaks Dam, authorized as part of the project for flood 
control, Santa Ana River Mainstem, California, by section 401(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4113), shall be 100 
percent of separable first costs and separable operation, maintenance, 
and replacement costs associated with the water conservation purpose.

SEC. 312. THAMES RIVER, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) Modification.--The project for navigation, Thames River, 
Connecticut, authorized by the 1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029), is modified to reconfigure the turning 
basin in accordance with the following alignment: Beginning at a point 
on the eastern limit of the existing project, N251052.93, E783934.59, 
thence running north 5 degrees, 25 minutes, 21.3 seconds east 341.06 
feet to a point, N251392.46, E783966.82, thence running north 47 
degrees, 24 minutes, 14.0 seconds west 268.72 feet to a point, 
N251574.34, E783769.00, thence running north 88 degrees, 41 minutes, 
52.2 seconds west 249.06 feet to a point, N251580.00, E783520.00, 
thence running south 46 degrees, 16 minutes, 22.9 seconds west 318.28 
feet to a point, N251360.00, E783290.00, thence running south 19 
degrees, 1 minute, 32.2 seconds east 306.76 feet to a point, 
N251070.00, E783390.00, thence running south 45 degrees, 0 minutes, 0 
seconds, east 155.56 feet to a point, N250960.00, E783500.00 on the 
existing western limit.
    (b) Payment for Initial Dredging.--Any required initial dredging of 
the widened portions identified in subsection (a) shall be carried out 
at no cost to the Federal Government.
    (c) Deauthorization.--The portions of the turning basin that are 
not included in the reconfigured turning basin described in subsection 
(a) are not authorized after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 313. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, Florida, authorized 
by section 101(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4802), is modified to authorize the Secretary to reclassify the 
removal and replacement of stone protection on both sides of the 
channel as general navigation features. The Secretary shall reimburse 
any costs that are incurred by the non-Federal sponsor in connection 
with the reclassified work and that the Secretary determines to be in 
excess of the non-Federal share of costs for general navigation 
features. The Federal and non-Federal shares of the cost of the 
reclassified work shall be determined in accordance with section 101 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).

SEC. 314. CAPTIVA ISLAND, FLORIDA.

    The project for shoreline protection, Captiva Island, Lee County, 
Florida, authorized pursuant to section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 
1965 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5; 79 Stat. 1073), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal interest for beach nourishment 
work carried out by such interest as if such work occurred after 
execution of the agreement entered into pursuant to section 215 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5a) with respect to such 
project if the Secretary determines that such work is compatible with 
the project.

SEC. 315. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, CANAL 51.

    The project for flood protection of West Palm Beach, Florida (C-
51), authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
Stat. 1183), is modified to provide for the construction of an enlarged 
stormwater detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1 East, generally 
in accordance with the plan of improvements described in the February 
15, 1994, report entitled ``Everglades Protection Project, Palm Beach 
County, Florida, Conceptual Design'', with such modifications as are 
approved by the Secretary. The additional work authorized by this 
section shall be accomplished at Federal expense. Operation and 
maintenance of the stormwater detention area shall be consistent with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary for the Central and Southern 
Florida project, and all costs of such operation and maintenance shall 
be provided by non-Federal interests.

SEC. 316. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, CANAL 111.

    (a) In General.--The project for Central and Southern Florida, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 
1176) and modified by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 
Stat. 740-741), is modified to authorize the Secretary to implement the 
recommended plan of improvement contained in a report entitled 
``Central and Southern Florida Project, Final Integrated General 
Reevaluation Report and Environmental Impact Statement, Canal 111 (C-
111), South Dade County, Florida'', dated May 1994, including 
acquisition by non-Federal interests of such portions of the Frog Pond 
and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
    implementing the plan of improvement shall be 50 percent.
        (2) Secretary of interior responsibility.--The Secretary of the 
    Interior shall pay 25 percent of the cost of acquiring such 
    portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for 
    the project. The amount paid by the Secretary of the Interior shall 
    be included as part of the Federal share of the cost of 
    implementing the plan.
        (3) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
    operation and maintenance costs of the improvements undertaken 
    pursuant to this section shall be 100 percent; except that the 
    Federal Government shall reimburse the non-Federal interest with 
    respect to the project 60 percent of the costs of operating and 
    maintaining pump stations that pump water into Taylor Slough in the 
    Everglades National Park.

SEC. 317. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), 
Florida, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4139-4140), is modified to direct 
the Secretary to carry out a project for mitigation consisting of 
measures for flow and circulation improvement within Mill Cove, at an 
estimated total Federal cost of $2,000,000.

SEC. 318. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shoreline protection, Panama City 
Beaches, Florida, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4133), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to enter into an agreement with the non-Federal interest for 
carrying out such project in accordance with section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 426i-1).
    (b) Reports.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report on the progress made in carrying out this section and a report 
on implementation of section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992.

SEC. 319. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    The project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow Plan, 
Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to limit the 
capacity of the reservoir project to not to exceed 11,000,000,000 
gallons or 32,000 acre-feet, to provide that the reservoir project may 
not be located north of 55th Street or west of East Avenue in the 
vicinity of McCook, Illinois, and to provide that the reservoir project 
may be constructed only on the basis of a specific plan that has been 
evaluated by the Secretary under the National Environmental Policy Act 
of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

SEC. 320. CHICAGO LOCK AND THOMAS J. O'BRIEN LOCK, ILLINOIS.

    The project for navigation, Chicago Harbor, Lake Michigan, 
Illinois, for which operation and maintenance responsibility was 
transferred to the Secretary under chapter IV of title I of the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (97 Stat. 311), and section 107 
of the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1982 (95 Stat. 
1137), is modified to direct the Secretary to conduct a study to 
determine the feasibility of making such structural repairs as are 
necessary to prevent leakage through the Chicago Lock and the Thomas J. 
O'Brien Lock, Illinois, and to determine the need for installing 
permanent flow measurement equipment at such locks to measure any 
leakage. The Secretary may carry out such repairs and installations as 
are necessary following completion of the study.

SEC. 321. KASKASKIA RIVER, ILLINOIS.

    The project for navigation, Kaskaskia River, Illinois, authorized 
by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1175), is 
modified to add fish and wildlife and habitat restoration as project 
purposes.

SEC. 322. LOCKS AND DAM 26, ALTON, ILLINOIS AND MISSOURI.

    Section 102(l) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4613) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``, that requires no separable project lands 
    and'' and inserting ``on project lands and other contiguous 
    nonproject lands, including those lands referred to as the Alton 
    Commons. The recreational development'';
        (2) by inserting ``shall be'' before ``at a Federal 
    construction''; and
        (3) by striking ``. The recreational development'' and 
    inserting ``, and''.

SEC. 323. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of the 
White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and other purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 
(49 Stat. 1586), is modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake 
riverfront alterations as described in the Central Indianapolis 
Waterfront Concept Master Plan, dated February 1994, at a total cost of 
$85,975,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $39,975,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $46,000,000. The cost of work, including 
relocations undertaken by the non-Federal interest after February 15, 
1994, on features identified in the Master Plan shall be credited 
toward the non-Federal share of project costs.

SEC. 324. BAPTISTE COLLETTE BAYOU, LOUISIANA.

    The project for navigation, Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1968 (82 Stat. 731), is modified to provide for the extension of the 
16-foot deep (mean low gulf) by 250-foot wide Baptiste Collette Bayou 
entrance channel to approximately mile 8 of the Mississippi River Gulf 
Outlet navigation channel at a total estimated Federal cost of $80,000, 
including $4,000 for surveys and $76,000 for Coast Guard aids to 
navigation.

SEC. 325. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane damage prevention and flood control, Lake 
Pontchartrain, Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), is modified to provide that St. 
Bernard Parish, Louisiana, and the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, 
Louisiana, shall not be required to pay the unpaid balance, including 
interest, of the non-Federal cost-share of the project.

SEC. 326. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LOUISIANA.

    Section 844 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4177) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Community Impact Mitigation Plan.--Using funds made available 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall implement a comprehensive 
community impact mitigation plan, as described in the evaluation report 
of the New Orleans District Engineer dated August 1995, that, to the 
maximum extent practicable, provides for mitigation or compensation, or 
both, for the direct and indirect social and cultural impacts that the 
project described in subsection (a) will have on the affected areas 
referred to in subsection (b).''.

SEC. 327. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL, MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, 
Maryland, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 297), is modified to direct the Secretary--
        (1) to expedite review of potential straightening of the 
    channel at the Tolchester Channel S-Turn; and
        (2) if determined to be feasible and necessary for safe and 
    efficient navigation, to implement such straightening as part of 
    project maintenance.

SEC. 328. CROSS VILLAGE HARBOR, MICHIGAN.

    (a) General Rule.--Notwithstanding section 1001 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a), the project for 
navigation, Cross Village Harbor, Michigan, authorized by section 101 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1405), shall remain 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (b) Limitation.--The project described in subsection (a) shall not 
be authorized for construction after the last day of the 5-year period 
that begins on the date of the enactment of this Act unless, during 
such period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 329. SAGINAW RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The project for flood protection, Saginaw River, Michigan, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 
311), is modified to include as part of the project the design and 
construction of an inflatable dam on the Flint River, Michigan, at a 
total cost of $500,000.

SEC. 330. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Sault Sainte Marie, 
Chippewa County, Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254-4255), is modified as 
follows:
        (1) Payment of non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the 
    cost of the project shall be paid as follows:
            (A) That portion of the non-Federal share that the 
        Secretary determines is attributable to use of the lock by 
        vessels calling at Canadian ports shall be paid by the United 
        States.
            (B) The remaining portion of the non-Federal share shall be 
        paid by the Great Lakes States pursuant to an agreement entered 
        into by such States.
        (2) Payment term of additional percentage.--The amount to be 
    paid by non-Federal interests pursuant to section 101(a) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)) and 
    this subsection with respect to the project may be paid over a 
    period of 50 years or the expected life of the project, whichever 
    is shorter.
    (b) Great Lakes States Defined.--In this section, the term ``Great 
Lakes States'' means the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, 
Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.

SEC. 331. ST. JOHNS BAYOU AND NEW MADRID FLOODWAY, MISSOURI.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Federal assistance made 
available under the rural enterprise zone program of the Department of 
Agriculture may be used toward payment of the non-Federal share of the 
costs of the project for flood control, St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid 
Floodway, Missouri, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4118).

SEC. 332. LOST CREEK, COLUMBUS, NEBRASKA.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be allotted for the project for flood control, Lost 
Creek, Columbus, Nebraska, shall be $5,500,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in such project pursuant to subsection (a).

SEC. 333. PASSAIC RIVER, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 1148 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4254) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1148. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN.

    ``(a) Acquisition of Lands.--The Secretary may acquire from willing 
sellers lands on which residential structures are located and that are 
subject to frequent and recurring flood damage, as identified in the 
supplemental floodway report of the Corps of Engineers, Passaic River 
Buyout Study, September 1995, at an estimated total cost of 
$194,000,000.
    ``(b) Retention of Lands for Flood Protection.--Lands acquired by 
the Secretary under this section shall be retained by the Secretary for 
future use in conjunction with flood protection and flood management in 
the Passaic River Basin.
    ``(c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of carrying 
out this section shall be 25 percent plus any amount that might result 
from application of subsection (d).
    ``(d) Applicability of Benefit-Cost Ratio Waiver Authority.--In 
evaluating and implementing the project under this section, the 
Secretary shall allow the non-Federal interest to participate in the 
financing of the project in accordance with section 903(c), to the 
extent that the Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such 
section is necessary to implement the project.''.

SEC. 334. ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM, NEW MEXICO.

    The second sentence of section 1113(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4232) is amended by inserting before 
the period at the end the following: ``; except that the Federal share 
of reconnaissance studies carried out by the Secretary under this 
section shall be 100 percent''.

SEC. 335. JONES INLET, NEW YORK.

    The project for navigation, Jones Inlet, New York, authorized by 
section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, 
repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to place uncontaminated dredged 
material on beach areas downdrift from the federally maintained channel 
to the extent that such work is necessary to mitigate the interruption 
of littoral system natural processes caused by the jetty and continued 
dredging of the federally maintained channel.

SEC. 336. BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, NORTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Acquisition of Easements.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may acquire, from willing 
    sellers, permanent flowage and saturation easements over--
            (A) the land in Williams County, North Dakota, extending 
        from the riverward margin of the Buford Trenton Irrigation 
        District main canal to the north bank of the Missouri River, 
        beginning at the Buford Trenton Irrigation District pumping 
        station located in the NE\1/4\ of section 17, T-152-N, R-104-W, 
        and continuing northeasterly downstream to the land referred to 
        as the East Bottom; and
            (B) any other land outside the boundaries of the land 
        described in subparagraph (A) within or contiguous to the 
        boundaries of the Buford Trenton Irrigation District that has 
        been affected by rising ground water and the risk of surface 
        flooding.
        (2) Scope.--Any easements acquired by the Secretary under 
    paragraph (1) shall include the right, power, and privilege of the 
    Federal Government to submerge, overflow, percolate, and saturate 
    the surface and subsurface of the lands and such other terms and 
    conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate.
        (3) Payment.--In acquiring easements under paragraph (1), the 
    Secretary shall pay an amount based on the unaffected fee value of 
    the lands to be acquired by the Federal Government. For the purpose 
    of this paragraph, the unaffected fee value of the lands is the 
    value of the lands as if the lands had not been affected by rising 
    ground water and the risk of surface flooding.
    (b) Conveyance of Drainage Pumps.--The Secretary shall--
        (1) convey to the Buford Trenton Irrigation District all right, 
    title, and interest of the United States in the drainage pumps 
    located within the boundaries of the District; and
        (2) provide a lump-sum payment of $60,000 for power 
    requirements associated with the operation of the drainage pumps.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $34,000,000.

SEC. 337. RENO BEACH-HOWARDS FARM, OHIO.

    The project for flood protection, Reno Beach-Howards Farm, Ohio, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 
1178), is modified to provide that the value of lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, and disposal areas that are necessary to carry out the 
project and are provided by the non-Federal interest shall be 
determined on the basis of the appraisal performed by the Corps of 
Engineers and dated April 4, 1985.

SEC. 338. BROKEN BOW LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLAHOMA.

    The project for flood control and water supply, Broken Bow Lake, 
Red River Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 309) and modified by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1187) and section 102(v) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4808), is further 
modified to provide for the reallocation of a sufficient quantity of 
water supply storage space in Broken Bow Lake to support the Mountain 
Fork trout fishery. Releases of water from Broken Bow Lake for the 
Mountain Fork trout fishery as mitigation for the loss of fish and 
wildlife resources in the Mountain Fork River shall be carried out at 
no expense to the State of Oklahoma.

SEC. 339. WISTER LAKE PROJECT, LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.

    The Secretary shall maintain a minimum conservation pool level of 
478 feet at the Wister Lake project in LeFlore County, Oklahoma, 
authorized by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood 
control, and for other purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 
1218). Notwithstanding title I of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) or any other provision of law, any 
increase in water supply yield that results from the pool level of 478 
feet shall be treated as unallocated water supply until such time as a 
user enters into a contract for the supply under such applicable laws 
concerning cost-sharing as are in effect on the date of the contract.

SEC. 340. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, COLUMBIA RIVER, OREGON AND 
              WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The project for Bonneville Lock and Dam, Columbia 
River, Oregon and Washington, authorized by the Act of August 20, 1937 
(50 Stat. 731), and modified by section 83 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 35), is further modified to authorize 
the Secretary to convey to the city of North Bonneville, Washington, at 
no further cost to the city, all right, title and interest of the 
United States in and to the following:
        (1) Any municipal facilities, utilities fixtures, and equipment 
    for the relocated city, and any remaining lands designated as open 
    spaces or municipal lots not previously conveyed to the city, 
    specifically, Lots M1 through M15, M16 (the ``community center 
    lot''), M18, M19, M22, M24, S42 through S45, and S52 through S60.
        (2) The ``school lot'' described as Lot 2, block 5, on the plat 
    of relocated North Bonneville.
        (3) Parcels 2 and C, but only upon the completion of any 
    environmental response actions required under applicable law.
        (4) That portion of Parcel B lying south of the existing city 
    boundary, west of the sewage treatment plant, and north of the 
    drainage ditch that is located adjacent to the northerly limit of 
    the Hamilton Island landfill, if the Secretary determines, at the 
    time of the proposed conveyance, that the Department of the Army 
    has taken all action necessary to protect human health and the 
    environment.
        (5) Such portions of Parcel H as can be conveyed without a 
    requirement for further investigation, inventory, or other action 
    by the Department of the Army under the National Historic 
    Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.).
        (6) Such easements as the Secretary considers necessary for--
            (A) sewer and water line crossings of relocated Washington 
        State Highway 14; and
            (B) reasonable public access to the Columbia River across 
        those portions of Hamilton Island that remain under the 
        ownership of the United States.
    (b) Time Period for Conveyances.--The conveyances referred to in 
subsections (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(5), and (a)(6)(A) shall be completed 
within 180 days after the United States receives the release referred 
to in subsection (d). All other conveyances shall be completed 
expeditiously, subject to any conditions specified in the applicable 
subsection.
    (c) Purpose.--The purpose of the conveyances authorized by 
subsection (a) is to resolve all outstanding issues between the United 
States and the city of North Bonneville.
    (d) Acknowledgement of Payment; Release of Claims Relating to 
Relocation of City.--As a prerequisite to the conveyances authorized by 
subsection (a), the city of North Bonneville shall execute an 
acknowledgement of payment of just compensation and shall execute a 
release of any and all claims for relief of any kind against the United 
States arising out of the relocation of the city of North Bonneville, 
or any prior Federal legislation relating thereto, and shall dismiss, 
with prejudice, any pending litigation, if any, involving such matters.
    (e) Release by Attorney General.--Upon receipt of the city's 
acknowledgment and release referred to in subsection (d), the Attorney 
General of the United States shall dismiss any pending litigation, if 
any, arising out of the relocation of the city of North Bonneville, and 
execute a release of any and all rights to damages of any kind under 
Town of North Bonneville, Washington v. United States, 11 Cl. Ct. 694, 
affirmed in part and reversed in part, 833 F.2d 1024 (Fed. Cir. 1987), 
cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1007 (1988), including any interest thereon.
    (f) Acknowledgment of Entitlements; Release by City of Claims.--
Within 60 days after the conveyances authorized by subsection (a) 
(other than paragraph (6)(B)) have been completed, the city shall 
execute an acknowledgement that all entitlements under such paragraph 
have been completed and shall execute a release of any and all claims 
for relief of any kind against the United States arising out of this 
section.
    (g) Effects on City.--Beginning on the date of the enactment of 
this Act, the city of North Bonneville, or any successor in interest 
thereto, shall--
        (1) be precluded from exercising any jurisdiction over any 
    lands owned in whole or in part by the United States and 
    administered by the Corps of Engineers in connection with the 
    Bonneville project; and
        (2) be authorized to change the zoning designations of, sell, 
    or resell Parcels S35 and S56, which are presently designated as 
    open spaces.

SEC. 341. COLUMBIA RIVER DREDGING, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

    The project for navigation, Lower Willamette and Columbia Rivers 
below Vancouver, Washington, and Portland, Oregon, authorized by the 
1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the 
construction, repair, preservation, and completion of certain public 
works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 
18, 1878 (20 Stat. 157), is modified to direct the Secretary--
        (1) to conduct channel simulation and to carry out improvements 
    to the existing deep draft channel between the mouth of the river 
    and river mile 34 at a cost not to exceed $2,400,000; and
        (2) to conduct overdepth and advance maintenance dredging that 
    is necessary to maintain authorized channel dimensions.

SEC. 342. LACKAWANNA RIVER AT SCRANTON, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Lackawanna River at 
Scranton, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 101(17) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), is modified to 
direct the Secretary to carry out the project for flood control for the 
Plot and Green Ridge sections of the project.
    (b) Applicability of Benefit-Cost Ratio Waiver Authority.--In 
evaluating and implementing the project, the Secretary shall allow the 
non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in 
accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184), to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation 
indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the 
project.

SEC. 343. MUSSERS DAM, MIDDLE CREEK, SNYDER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 209(e)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4830) is amended by striking ``$3,000,000'' and inserting 
``$5,000,000''.

SEC. 344. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The navigation project for the Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by the 1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
approved August 8, 1917 (40 Stat. 252), is modified to provide for the 
periodic removal and disposal of sediment to provide for a depth of 6 
feet within portions of the Fairmount pool between the Fairmount Dam 
and the Columbia Bridge, generally within the limits of the channel 
alignments referred to as the Schuylkill River Racecourse and return 
lane, and the Belmont Water Works intakes and Boathouse Row.

SEC. 345. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Cost Sharing.--Section 313(d)(3)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(A) In general.--Total project costs under each local 
        cooperation agreement entered into under this subsection shall 
        be shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. The 
        Federal share may be provided in the form of grants or 
        reimbursements of project costs. The non-Federal interests 
        shall receive credit--
                ``(i) for design and construction services and other 
            in-kind work, whether occurring subsequent to, or within 6 
            years prior to, entering into an agreement with the 
            Secretary; and
                ``(ii) for grants and the value of work performed on 
            behalf of such interests by State and local agencies, as 
            determined by the Secretary.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 313(g)(1) of such Act 
(106 Stat. 4846) is amended by striking ``$50,000,000'' and inserting 
``$80,000,000''.
    (c) Section Heading.--The heading to section 313 of such Act is 
amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 313. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT 
              PROGRAM.''.

SEC. 346. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to authorize the Secretary--
        (1) to include as part of the construction of the project 
    mechanical and electrical upgrades to stormwater pumping stations 
    in the Wyoming Valley; and
        (2) to carry out mitigation measures that the Secretary would 
    otherwise be authorized to carry out, but for the General Design 
    Memorandum for phase II of the project, as approved by the 
    Assistant Secretary of the Army having responsibility for civil 
    works on February 15, 1996, providing that such measures are to be 
    carried out for credit by the non-Federal interest.

SEC. 347. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND.

    The project for reconstruction of the Allendale Dam, North 
Providence, Rhode Island, authorized by section 358 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4861), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to reconstruct the dam, at a total cost of 
$350,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $262,500 and an estimated 
non-Federal cost of $87,500.

SEC. 348. NARRAGANSETT, RHODE ISLAND.

    Section 361(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4861) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$200,000'' and inserting ``$1,900,000'';
        (2) by striking ``$150,000'' and inserting ``$1,425,000''; and
        (3) by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting ``$475,000''.

SEC. 349. CLOUTER CREEK DISPOSAL AREA, CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--Notwithstanding any 
other law, the Secretary of the Navy shall transfer to the Secretary 
administrative jurisdiction over the approximately 1,400 acres of land 
under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy that comprise a 
portion of the Clouter Creek disposal area, Charleston, South Carolina.
    (b) Use of Transferred Land.--The land transferred under subsection 
(a) shall be used by the Department of the Army as a dredged material 
disposal area for dredging activities in the vicinity of Charleston, 
South Carolina, including the Charleston Harbor navigation project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Operation and maintenance, including 
rehabilitation, of the dredged material disposal area transferred under 
this section shall be carried out in accordance with section 101 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).

SEC. 350. BUFFALO BAYOU, TEXAS.

    The non-Federal interest for the projects for flood control, 
Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1258) and by section 101(a)(21) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610), may be 
reimbursed by up to $5,000,000 or may receive a credit of up to 
$5,000,000 toward required non-Federal project cost-sharing 
contributions for work performed by the non-Federal interest at each of 
the following locations if such work is compatible with 1 or more of 
the following authorized projects: White Oak Bayou, Brays Bayou, 
Hunting Bayou, Garners Bayou, and the Upper Reach on Greens Bayou.

SEC. 351. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Dallas Floodway 
Extension, Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1091), is modified to provide that flood 
protection works constructed by the non-Federal interests along the 
Trinity River in Dallas, Texas, for Rochester Park and the Central 
Wastewater Treatment Plant shall be included as a part of the project 
and the cost of such works shall be credited against the non-Federal 
share of project costs.
    (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be credited under 
subsection (a) shall be determined by the Secretary. In determining 
such amount, the Secretary may permit credit only for that portion of 
the work performed by the non-Federal interests that is compatible with 
the project referred to in subsection (a), including any modification 
thereof, and that is required for construction of such project.
    (c) Cash Contribution.--Nothing in this section shall be construed 
to limit the applicability of the requirement contained in section 
103(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2213(a)(1)(A)) to the project referred to in subsection (a).

SEC. 352. GRUNDY, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall proceed with planning, engineering, design, and 
construction of the Grundy, Virginia, element of the Levisa and Tug 
Forks of the Big Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River project, 
authorized by section 202 of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), in accordance with Plan 3A as 
set forth in the preliminary draft detailed project report of the 
Huntington District Commander, dated August 1993.

SEC. 353. HAYSI LAKE, VIRGINIA.

    The Haysi Lake, Virginia, feature of the project for flood control, 
Tug Fork of the Big Sandy River, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Virginia, 
authorized pursuant to section 202(a) of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is modified--
        (1) to add recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement as 
    project purposes;
        (2) to direct the Secretary to construct the Haysi Dam feature 
    of the project substantially in accordance with Plan A as set forth 
    in the Draft General Plan Supplement Report for the Levisa Fork 
    Basin, Virginia and Kentucky, dated May 1995;
        (3) to direct the Secretary to apply section 103(m) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m); 100 
    Stat. 4087) to the construction of such feature in the same manner 
    as that section is applied to other projects or project features 
    constructed pursuant to such section 202(a); and
        (4) to provide for operation and maintenance of recreational 
    facilities on a reimbursable basis.

SEC. 354. RUDEE INLET, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    The project for navigation and shoreline protection, Rudee Inlet, 
Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to continue maintenance of the project for 50 
years beginning on the date of initial construction of the project. The 
Federal share of the cost of such maintenance shall be determined in 
accordance with title I of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).

SEC. 355. VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Adjustment of Non-Federal Share.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the non-Federal share of the costs of the project for 
beach erosion control and hurricane protection, Virginia Beach, 
Virginia, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4136), shall be reduced by 
$3,120,803 or by such amount as is determined by an audit carried out 
by the Department of the Army to be due to the city of Virginia Beach 
as reimbursement for beach nourishment activities carried out by the 
city between October 1, 1986, and September 30, 1993, if the Federal 
Government has not reimbursed the city for the activities prior to the 
date on which a project cooperation agreement is executed for the 
project.
    (b) Extension of Federal Participation.--
        (1) In general.--In accordance with section 156 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5f), the 
    Secretary shall extend Federal participation in the periodic 
    nourishment of Virginia Beach as authorized by section 101 of the 
    River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1254) and modified by 
    section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1177).
        (2) Duration.--Federal participation under paragraph (1) shall 
    extend until the earlier of--
            (A) the end of the 50-year period provided for in section 
        156 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 
        1962d-5f); and
            (B) the completion of the project for beach erosion control 
        and hurricane protection, Virginia Beach, Virginia, as modified 
        by section 102(cc) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1992 (106 Stat. 4810).

SEC. 356. EAST WATERWAY, WASHINGTON.

    The project for navigation, East and West Waterways, Seattle 
Harbor, Washington, authorized by the 1st section of the Act entitled 
``An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 1285), is modified 
to direct the Secretary--
        (1) to expedite review of potential deepening of the channel in 
    the East waterway from Elliott Bay to Terminal 25 to a depth of up 
    to 51 feet; and
        (2) if determined to be feasible, to implement such deepening 
    as part of project maintenance.
In carrying out work authorized by this section, the Secretary shall 
coordinate with the Port of Seattle regarding use of Slip 27 as a 
dredged material disposal area.

SEC. 357. BLUESTONE LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4810) is amended by inserting after ``project,'' the 1st place it 
appears ``except for that organic matter necessary to maintain and 
enhance the biological resources of such waters and such nonobtrusive 
items of debris as may not be economically feasible to prevent being 
released through such project,''.

SEC. 358. MOOREFIELD, WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Review.--The Secretary, as part of the implementation of the 
project for flood control, Moorefield, West Virginia, shall conduct a 
review of the activities of the Corps of Engineers to determine whether 
the failure of the Corps of Engineers to complete land acquisition for 
the project by May 1, 1996, contributed to any flood damages at the 
town of Moorefield during 1996.
    (b) Reduction of Non-Federal Share.--To the extent the Secretary 
determines under subsection (a) that the activities of the Corps of 
Engineers contributed to any flood damages, the Secretary shall reduce 
the non-Federal share of the flood control project by up to $700,000. 
Such costs shall become a Federal responsibility for carrying out the 
flood control project.

SEC. 359. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Cost Sharing.--Section 340(c)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended to read as follows:
        ``(3) Cost sharing.--
            ``(A) In general.--Total project costs under each local 
        cooperation agreement entered into under this subsection shall 
        be shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. The 
        Federal share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
        project costs.
            ``(B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest 
        shall receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by such interest prior to entering into a local 
        cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. The 
        credit for such design work shall not exceed 6 percent of the 
        total construction costs of the project.
            ``(C) Credit for interest.--In the event of a delay in the 
        funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share of a project's cost.
            ``(D) Credit for lands, easements, and rights-of-way.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for lands, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward its share of project 
        costs (including all reasonable costs associated with obtaining 
        permits necessary for the construction, operation, and 
        maintenance of such project on publicly owned or controlled 
        lands), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            ``(E) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and maintenance 
        costs for projects constructed with assistance provided under 
        this section shall be 100 percent non-Federal.''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1992 (106 Stat. 4856) is amended by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$20,000,000''.

SEC. 360. WEST VIRGINIA TRAILHEAD FACILITIES.

    Section 306 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4840-4841) is amended--
        (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
    Secretary''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Interagency Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into an 
interagency agreement with the Federal entity that provided assistance 
in the preparation of the study for the purposes of providing ongoing 
technical assistance and oversight for the trail facilities envisioned 
by the plan developed under this section. The Federal entity shall 
provide such assistance and oversight.''.

SEC. 361. KICKAPOO RIVER, WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control and allied purposes, 
Kickapoo River, Wisconsin, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1190) and modified by section 814 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4169), is further 
modified as provided by this section.
    (b) Transfer of Property.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to the requirements of this 
    subsection, the Secretary shall transfer to the State of Wisconsin, 
    without consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United 
    States to the lands described in paragraph (3), including all 
    works, structures, and other improvements to such lands.
        (2) Transfer to secretary of the interior.--Subject to the 
    requirements of this subsection, on the date of the transfer under 
    paragraph (1), the Secretary shall transfer to the Secretary of the 
    Interior, without consideration, all right, title, and interest of 
    the United States to lands that are culturally and religiously 
    significant sites of the Ho-Chunk Nation (a federally recognized 
    Indian tribe) and are located within the lands described in 
    paragraph (3). Such lands shall be described in accordance with 
    paragraph (4)(C) and may not exceed a total of 1,200 acres.
        (3) Land description.--The lands to be transferred pursuant to 
    paragraphs (1) and (2) are the approximately 8,569 acres of land 
    associated with the LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of the project 
    referred to in subsection (a) in Vernon County, Wisconsin, in the 
    following sections:
            (A) Section 31, Township 14 North, Range 1 West of the 4th 
        Principal Meridian.
            (B) Sections 2 through 11, and 16, 17, 20, and 21, Township 
        13 North, Range 2 West of the 4th Principal Meridian.
            (C) Sections 15, 16, 21 through 24, 26, 27, 31, and 33 
        through 36, Township 14 North, Range 2 West of the 4th 
        Principal Meridian.
        (4) Terms and conditions.--
            (A) Hold harmless; reimbursement of united states.--The 
        transfer under paragraph (1) shall be made on the condition 
        that the State of Wisconsin enters into a written agreement 
        with the Secretary to hold the United States harmless from all 
        claims arising from or through the operation of the lands and 
        improvements subject to the transfer. If title to the lands 
        described in paragraph (3) is sold or transferred by the State, 
        the State shall reimburse the United States for the price 
        originally paid by the United States for purchasing such lands.
            (B) In general.--The Secretary shall make the transfers 
        under paragraphs (1) and (2) only if on or before October 31, 
        1997, the State of Wisconsin enters into and submits to the 
        Secretary a memorandum of understanding, as specified in 
        subparagraph (C), with the tribal organization (as defined by 
        section 4(l) of the Indian Self-Determination and Education 
        Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b(l))) of the Ho-Chunk Nation.
            (C) Memorandum of understanding.--The memorandum of 
        understanding referred to in subparagraph (B) shall contain, at 
        a minimum, the following:
                (i) A description of sites and associated lands to be 
            transferred to the Secretary of the Interior under 
            paragraph (2).
                (ii) An agreement specifying that the lands transferred 
            under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be preserved in a 
            natural state and developed only to the extent necessary to 
            enhance outdoor recreational and educational opportunities.
                (iii) An agreement specifying the terms and conditions 
            of a plan for the management of the lands to be transferred 
            under paragraphs (1) and (2).
                (iv) A provision requiring a review of the plan 
            referred to in clause (iii) to be conducted every 10 years 
            under which the State of Wisconsin, acting through the 
            Kickapoo Valley Governing Board, and the Ho-Chunk Nation 
            may agree to revisions to the plan in order to address 
            changed circumstances on the lands transferred under 
            paragraph (2). Such provision may include a plan for the 
            transfer by the State to the United States of any 
            additional site discovered to be culturally and religiously 
            significant to the Ho-Chunk Nation.
                (v) An agreement preventing or limiting the public 
            disclosure of the location or existence of each site of 
            particular cultural or religious significance to the Ho-
            Chunk Nation if public disclosure would jeopardize the 
            cultural or religious integrity of the site.
        (5) Administration of lands.--The lands transferred to the 
    Secretary of the Interior under paragraph (2), and any lands 
    transferred to the Secretary of the Interior under the memorandum 
    of understanding entered into under paragraph (4), or under any 
    revision of such memorandum of understanding, shall be held in 
    trust by the United States for, and added to and administered as 
    part of the reservation of, the Ho-Chunk Nation.
        (6) Transfer of flowage easements.--The Secretary shall 
    transfer to the owner of the servient estate, without 
    consideration, all right, title, and interest of the United States 
    in and to each flowage easement acquired as part of the project 
    referred to in subsection (a) within Township 14 North, Range 2 
    West of the 4th Principal Meridian, Vernon County, Wisconsin.
        (7) Deauthorization.--Except as provided in subsection (c), the 
    LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of the project referred to in 
    subsection (a) is not authorized after the date of the transfer 
    under this subsection.
        (8) Interim management and maintenance.--The Secretary shall 
    continue to manage and maintain the LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of 
    the project referred to in subsection (a) until the date of the 
    transfer under this subsection.
    (c) Completion of Project Features.--
        (1) Requirement.--The Secretary shall undertake the completion 
    of the following features of the project referred to in subsection 
    (a):
            (A) The continued relocation of State highway route 131 and 
        county highway routes P and F substantially in accordance with 
        plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 6, Relocation-LaFarge 
        Reservoir, dated June 1970; except that the relocation shall 
        generally follow the existing road rights-of-way through the 
        Kickapoo Valley.
            (B) Site restoration of abandoned wells, farm sites, and 
        safety modifications to the water control structures.
        (2) Additional requirements.--All activities undertaken 
    pursuant to this subsection shall comply with the Native American 
    Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), 
    the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 U.S.C. 
    470aa et seq.), the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 
    470 et seq.), and any subsequent Federal law enacted relating to 
    cultural artifacts, human remains, or historic preservation.
        (3) Participation by state of wisconsin and the ho-chunk 
    nation.--In undertaking completion of the features under paragraph 
    (1), the Secretary shall consult with the State of Wisconsin and 
    the Ho-Chunk Nation on the location of each feature.
    (d) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section $17,000,000.

SEC. 362. TETON COUNTY, WYOMING.

    Section 840 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4176) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``: Provided, That'' and inserting ``; except 
    that'';
        (2) by striking ``in cash or materials'' and inserting ``, 
    through providing in-kind services or cash or materials,''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following: ``In carrying out this 
    section, the Secretary may enter into agreements with the non-
    Federal sponsor permitting the non-Federal sponsor to perform 
    operation and maintenance for the project on a cost-reimbursable 
    basis.''.

SEC. 363. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, Arkansas.--The 
project for flood control, Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, 
Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 
(64 Stat. 174) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary; except that the scope of 
the project includes ground water protection and conservation, 
agricultural water supply, and waterfowl management if the Secretary 
determines that the change in the scope of the project is technically 
sound, environmentally acceptable, and economic, as applicable.
    (b) White River, Arkansas.--The project for navigation, White River 
Navigation to Batesville, Arkansas, authorized by section 601(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4139) and 
deauthorized by section 52(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1988 (102 Stat. 4044), is authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary.
    (c) Des Plaines River, Illinois.--The project for wetlands 
research, Des Plaines River, Illinois, authorized by section 45 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4041) and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary.
    (d) Alpena Harbor, Michigan.--The project for navigation, Alpena 
Harbor, Michigan, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (e) Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, Michigan.--The project for 
navigation, Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, Michigan, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1176) and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary.
    (f) Knife River Harbor, Minnesota.--The project for navigation, 
Knife River Harbor, Minnesota, authorized by section 100 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 41) and deauthorized 
pursuant to section 1001(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary.
    (g) Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey.--The project for hurricane-flood 
protection and beach erosion control on Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, 
New Jersey, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
(76 Stat. 1181) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.

SEC. 364. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    The following projects are not authorized after the date of the 
enactment of this Act:
        (1) Branford harbor, connecticut.--The 2,267 square foot 
    portion of the project for navigation in the Branford River, 
    Branford Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the 1st section of the 
    Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, 
    repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
    harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 
    333), lying shoreward of a line described as follows: Beginning at 
    a point on the authorized Federal navigation channel line the 
    coordinates of which are N156,181.32, E581,572.38, running thence 
    south 70 degrees, 11 minutes, 8 seconds west a distance of 171.58 
    feet to another point on the authorized Federal navigation channel 
    line the coordinates of which are N156,123.16, E581,410.96.
        (2) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--
            (A) Anchorage area.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), 
        consisting of a 2-acre anchorage area with a depth of 6 feet at 
        the head of Johnsons River between the Federal channel and 
        Hollisters Dam.
            (B) Johnsons river channel.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Johnsons River Channel, Bridgeport Harbor, 
        Connecticut, authorized by the 1st section of the Act entitled 
        ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation 
        of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
        purposes'', approved July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 634), that is 
        northerly of a line across the Federal channel the coordinates 
        of which are north 123318.35, east 486301.68, and north 
        123257.15, east 486380.77.
        (3) Guilford harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
    for navigation, Guilford Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by section 
    2 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, 
    repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
    harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 
    13), that consists of the 6-foot deep channel in Sluice Creek and 
    that is not included in the following description of the realigned 
    channel: Beginning at a point where the Sluice Creek Channel 
    intersects with the main entrance channel, N159194.63, E623201.07, 
    thence running north 24 degrees, 58 minutes, 15.2 seconds west 
    478.40 feet to a point N159628.31, E622999.11, thence running north 
    20 degrees, 18 minutes, 31.7 seconds west 351.53 feet to a point 
    N159957.99, E622877.10, thence running north 69 degrees, 41 
    minutes, 37.9 seconds east 55.00 feet to a point N159977.08, 
    E622928.69, thence turning and running south 20 degrees, 18 
    minutes, 31.0 seconds east 349.35 feet to a point N159649.45, 
    E623049.94, thence turning and running south 24 degrees, 58 
    minutes, 11.1 seconds east 341.36 feet to a point N159340.00, 
    E623194.04, thence turning and running south 90 degrees, 0 minutes, 
    0 seconds east 78.86 feet to a point N159340.00, E623272.90.
        (4) Mystic river, connecticut.--The following portion of the 
    project for improving the Mystic River, Connecticut, authorized by 
    the 1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations 
    for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public 
    works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
    March 4, 1913 (37 Stat. 802): Beginning in the 15-foot deep channel 
    at coordinates north 190860.82, east 814416.20, thence running 
    southeast about 52.01 feet to the coordinates north 190809.47, east 
    814424.49, thence running southwest about 34.02 feet to coordinates 
    north 190780.46, east 814406.70, thence running north about 80.91 
    feet to the point of beginning.
        (5) Norwalk harbor, connecticut.--
            (A) In general.--The following portions of projects for 
        navigation, Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut:
                (i) The portion authorized by the 1st section of the 
            Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the 
            construction, repair, and preservation of certain public 
            works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
            approved March 2, 1919 (40 Stat. 1276), that lies northerly 
            of a line across the Federal channel having coordinates 
            N104199.72, E417774.12 and N104155.59, E417628.96.
                (ii) The portions of the 6-foot deep East Norwalk 
            Channel and Anchorage, authorized by section 2 of the Act 
            entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
            preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
            and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 
            13), that are not included in the description of the 
            realigned channel and anchorage set forth in subparagraph 
            (B).
            (B) Description of realigned channel and anchorage.--The 
        realigned 6-foot deep East Norwalk Channel and Anchorage 
        referred to in subparagraph (A)(ii) is described as follows: 
        Beginning at a point on the East Norwalk Channel, N95743.02, 
        E419581.37, thence running northwesterly about 463.96 feet to a 
        point N96197.93, E419490.18, thence running northwesterly about 
        549.32 feet to a point N96608.49, E419125.23, thence running 
        northwesterly about 384.06 feet to a point N96965.94, 
        E418984.75, thence running northwesterly about 407.26 feet to a 
        point N97353.87, E418860.78, thence running westerly about 
        58.26 feet to a point N97336.26, E418805.24, thence running 
        northwesterly about 70.99 feet to a point N97390.30, 
        E418759.21, thence running westerly about 71.78 feet to a point 
        on the anchorage limit N97405.26, E418689.01, thence running 
        southerly along the western limits of the Federal anchorage in 
        existence on the date of the enactment of this Act until 
        reaching a point N95893.74, E419449.17, thence running in a 
        southwesterly direction about 78.74 feet to a point on the East 
        Norwalk Channel N95815.62, E419439.33.
            (C) Designation of realigned channel and anchorage.--All of 
        the realigned channel shall be redesignated as an anchorage, 
        with the exception of the portion of the channel that narrows 
        to a width of 100 feet and terminates at a line the coordinates 
        of which are N96456.81, E419260.06 and N96390.37, E419185.32, 
        which shall remain as a channel.
        (6) Patchogue river, westbrook, connecticut.--
            (A) In general.--The following portion of the project for 
        navigation, Patchogue River, Connecticut, authorized by section 
        101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1249): A 
        portion of the 8-foot deep channel that lies northwesterly of a 
        line whose coordinates are N161108.83, E676901.34 and 
        N161246.53, E677103.75. The perimeter of this area starts at a 
        point with coordinates N161108.83, E676901.34, thence running 
        north 7 degrees, 50 minutes, 44.2 seconds west 27.91 feet to a 
        point N161136.48, E676897.53, thence running north 55 degrees, 
        46 minutes, 23.3 seconds east 190.05 feet to a point 
        N161243.38, E677054.67, thence running north 86 degrees, 19 
        minutes, 39.9 seconds east 49.18 feet to a point N161246.53, 
        E677103.75, thence running south 55 degrees, 46 minutes, 20.8 
        seconds west 244.81 feet to the point of origin.
            (B) Redesignation.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Patchogue River, Connecticut, referred to in 
        subparagraph (A), which is now part of the 8-foot deep 
        anchorage lying northwesterly of a line whose coordinates are 
        N161067.46, E676982.76 and N161173.63, E677138.81, is 
        redesignated as part of the 8-foot deep channel. The perimeter 
        of this area starts at a point with coordinates N161067.46, 
        E676982.76, thence running north 7 degrees, 48 minutes, 40.7 
        seconds west 5.59 feet to a point N161073.00, E676982.00, 
        thence running north 55 degrees, 46 minutes, 25.1 seconds east 
        177.79 feet to a point N161173.00, E677129.00, thence running 
        north 86 degrees, 19 minutes, 31.8 seconds east 9.83 feet to a 
        point N161173.63, E677138.81, thence running south 55 degrees, 
        46 minutes, 12.9 seconds west 188.74 feet to the point of 
        origin.
        (7) Southport harbor, connecticut.--
            (A) In general.--The following portions of the project for 
        navigation, Southport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the 
        1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
        construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works 
        on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
        August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029):
                (i) The 6-foot deep anchorage located at the head of 
            the project.
                (ii) The portion of the 9-foot deep channel beginning 
            at a bend in the channel the coordinates of which are north 
            109131.16, east 452653.32, running thence in a 
            northeasterly direction about 943.01 feet to a point the 
            coordinates of which are north 109635.22, east 453450.31, 
            running thence in a southeasterly direction about 22.66 
            feet to a point the coordinates of which are north 
            109617.15, east 453463.98, running thence in a 
            southwesterly direction about 945.18 feet to the point of 
            beginning.
            (B) Remainder.--The portion of the project referred to in 
        subparagraph (A) that is remaining after the deauthorization 
        made by subparagraph (A) and that is northerly of a line the 
        coordinates of which are north 108699.15, east 452768.36, and 
        north 108655.66, east 452858.73, is redesignated as an 
        anchorage.
        (8) Stony creek, connecticut.--The following portion of the 
    project for navigation, Stony Creek, Connecticut, authorized under 
    section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
    located in the 6-foot deep maneuvering basin: Beginning at 
    coordinates N157,031.91, E599,030.79, thence running northeasterly 
    about 221.16 feet to coordinates N157,191.06, E599,184.37, thence 
    running northerly about 162.60 feet to coordinates N157,353.56, 
    E599,189.99, thence running southwesterly about 358.90 feet to the 
    point of beginning.
        (9) East boothbay harbor, maine.--The following portion of the 
    navigation project for East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by 
    the 1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations 
    for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public 
    works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
    June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 657), containing approximately 1.15 acres 
    and described in accordance with the Maine State Coordinate System, 
    West Zone:
        Beginning at a point noted as point number 6 and shown as 
    having plan coordinates of North 9, 722, East 9, 909, on the plan 
    entitled, ``East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, examination, 8-foot 
    area'', and dated August 9, 1955, Drawing Number F1251 D-6-2, that 
    point having Maine State Coordinate System, West Zone coordinates 
    of Northing 74514, Easting 698381.
        Thence, North 58 degrees, 12 minutes, 30 seconds East a 
    distance of 120.9 feet to a point.
        Thence, South 72 degrees, 21 minutes, 50 seconds East a 
    distance of 106.2 feet to a point.
        Thence, South 32 degrees, 04 minutes, 55 seconds East a 
    distance of 218.9 feet to a point.
        Thence, South 61 degrees, 29 minutes, 40 seconds West a 
    distance of 148.9 feet to a point.
        Thence, North 35 degrees, 14 minutes, 12 seconds West a 
    distance of 87.5 feet to a point.
        Thence, North 78 degrees, 30 minutes, 58 seconds West a 
    distance of 68.4 feet to a point.
        Thence, North 27 degrees, 11 minutes, 39 seconds West a 
    distance of 157.3 feet to the point of beginning.
        (10) Kennebunk river, maine.--The portion of the project for 
    navigation, Kennebunk River, Maine, authorized by section 101 of 
    the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1173) and consisting of 
    a 6-foot deep channel that lies northerly of a line the coordinates 
    of which are N191412.53, E417265.28 and N191445.83, E417332.48.
        (11) York harbor, maine.--The following portions of the project 
    for navigation, York Harbor, Maine, authorized by section 101 of 
    the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480):
            (A) The portion located in the 8-foot deep anchorage area 
        beginning at coordinates N109340.19, E372066.93, thence running 
        north 65 degrees, 12 minutes, 10.5 seconds east 423.27 feet to 
        a point N109517.71, E372451.17, thence running north 28 
        degrees, 42 minutes, 58.3 seconds west 11.68 feet to a point 
        N109527.95, E372445.56, thence running south 63 degrees, 37 
        minutes, 24.6 seconds west 422.63 feet to the point of 
        beginning.
            (B) The portion located in the 8-foot deep anchorage area 
        beginning at coordinates N108557.24, E371645.88, thence running 
        south 60 degrees, 41 minutes, 17.2 seconds east 484.51 feet to 
        a point N108320.04, E372068.36, thence running north 29 
        degrees, 12 minutes, 53.3 seconds east 15.28 feet to a point 
        N108333.38, E372075.82, thence running north 62 degrees, 29 
        minutes, 42.1 seconds west 484.73 feet to the point of 
        beginning.
        (12) Chelsea river, boston harbor, massachusetts.--The 
    following portion of the project for navigation, Boston Harbor, 
    Massachusetts, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor 
    Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1173), consisting of a 35-foot deep channel 
    in the Chelsea River: Beginning at a point on the northern limit of 
    the existing project N505357.84, E724519.19, thence running 
    northeasterly about 384.19 feet along the northern limit of the 
    existing project to a bend on the northern limit of the existing 
    project N505526.87, E724864.20, thence running southeasterly about 
    368.00 feet along the northern limit of the existing project to 
    another point N505404.77, E725211.35, thence running westerly about 
    594.53 feet to a point N505376.12, E724617.51, thence running 
    southwesterly about 100.00 feet to the point of origin.
        (13) Cohasset harbor, massachusetts.--The following portions of 
    the project for navigation, Cohasset Harbor, Massachusetts, 
    authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
    the construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works 
    on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 
    1945 (59 Stat. 12), and authorized pursuant to section 107 of the 
    River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577): A 7-foot deep 
    anchorage and a 6-foot deep anchorage; beginning at site 1, 
    beginning at a point N453510.15, E792664.63, thence running south 
    53 degrees 07 minutes 05.4 seconds west 307.00 feet to a point 
    N453325.90, E792419.07, thence running north 57 degrees 56 minutes 
    36.8 seconds west 201.00 feet to a point N453432.58, E792248.72, 
    thence running south 88 degrees 57 minutes 25.6 seconds west 50.00 
    feet to a point N453431.67, E792198.73, thence running north 01 
    degree 02 minutes 52.3 seconds west 66.71 feet to a point 
    N453498.37, E792197.51, thence running north 69 degrees 12 minutes 
    52.3 seconds east 332.32 feet to a point N453616.30, E792508.20, 
    thence running south 55 degrees 50 minutes 24.1 seconds east 189.05 
    feet to the point of origin; then site 2, beginning at a point, 
    N452886.64, E791287.83, thence running south 00 degrees 00 minutes 
    00.0 seconds west 56.04 feet to a point, N452830.60, E791287.83, 
    thence running north 90 degrees 00 minutes 00.0 seconds west 101.92 
    feet to a point, N452830.60, E791185.91, thence running north 52 
    degrees 12 minutes 49.7 seconds east 89.42 feet to a point, 
    N452885.39, E791256.58, thence running north 87 degrees 42 minutes 
    33.8 seconds east 31.28 feet to the point of origin; and site 3, 
    beginning at a point, N452261.08, E792040.24, thence running north 
    89 degrees 07 minutes 19.5 seconds east 118.78 feet to a point, 
    N452262.90, E792159.01, thence running south 43 degrees 39 minutes 
    06.8 seconds west 40.27 feet to a point, N452233.76, E792131.21, 
    thence running north 74 degrees 33 minutes 29.1 seconds west 94.42 
    feet to a point, N452258.90, E792040.20, thence running north 01 
    degree 03 minutes 04.3 seconds east 2.18 feet to the point of 
    origin.
        (14) Falmouth, massachusetts.--
            (A) Deauthorizations.--The following portions of the 
        project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 
        (62 Stat. 1172):
                (i) The portion commencing at a point north 199286.37 
            east 844394.81 a line running north 73 degrees 09 minutes 
            29 seconds east 440.34 feet to a point north 199413.99 east 
            844816.36, thence turning and running north 43 degrees 09 
            minutes 34.5 seconds east 119.99 feet to a point north 
            199501.52 east 844898.44, thence turning and running south 
            66 degrees 52 minutes 03.5 seconds east 547.66 feet 
            returning to a point north 199286.41 east 844394.91.
                (ii) The portion commencing at a point north 199647.41 
            east 845035.25 a line running north 43 degrees 09 minutes 
            33.1 seconds east 767.15 feet to a point north 200207.01 
            east 845560.00, thence turning and running north 11 degrees 
            04 minutes 24.3 seconds west 380.08 feet to a point north 
            200580.01 east 845487.00, thence turning and running north 
            22 degrees 05 minutes 50.8 seconds east 1332.36 feet to a 
            point north 201814.50 east 845988.21, thence turning and 
            running north 02 degrees 54 minutes 15.7 seconds east 15.0 
            feet to a point north 201829.48 east 845988.97, thence 
            turning and running south 24 degrees 56 minutes 42.3 
            seconds west 1410.29 feet returning to the point north 
            200550.75 east 845394.18.
            (B) Redesignation.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Falmouth, Massachusetts, referred to in 
        subparagraph (A) upstream of a line designated by the 2 points 
        north 199463.18 east 844496.40 and north 199350.36 east 
        844544.60 is redesignated as an anchorage area.
        (15) Mystic river, massachusetts.--The following portion of the 
    project for navigation, Mystic River, Massachusetts, authorized by 
    section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 (64 Stat. 164): The 
    35-foot deep channel beginning at a point on the northern limit of 
    the existing project, N506243.78, E717600.27, thence running 
    easterly about 1000.00 feet along the northern limit of the 
    existing project to a point, N506083.42, E718587.33, thence running 
    southerly about 40.00 feet to a point, N506043.94, E718580.91, 
    thence running westerly about 1000.00 feet to a point, N506204.29, 
    E717593.85, thence running northerly about 40.00 feet to the point 
    of origin.
        (16) Reserved channel, boston, massachusetts.--The portion of 
    the project for navigation, Reserved Channel, Boston, 
    Massachusetts, authorized by section 101(a)(13) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607), that consists 
    of a 40-foot deep channel beginning at a point along the southern 
    limit of the authorized project, N489391.22, E728246.54, thence 
    running northerly about 54 feet to a point, N489445.53, E728244.97, 
    thence running easterly about 2,926 feet to a point, N489527.38, 
    E731170.41, thence running southeasterly about 81 feet to a point, 
    N489474.87, E731232.55, thence running westerly about 2,987 feet to 
    the point of origin.
        (17) Weymouth-fore and town rivers, massachusetts.--The 
    following portions of the project for navigation, Weymouth-Fore and 
    Town Rivers, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, authorized by section 
    301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1089):
            (A) The 35-foot deep channel beginning at a bend on the 
        southern limit of the existing project, N457394.01, E741109.74, 
        thence running westerly about 405.25 feet to a point, 
        N457334.64, E740708.86, thence running southwesterly about 
        462.60 feet to another bend in the southern limit of the 
        existing project, N457132.00, E740293.00, thence running 
        northeasterly about 857.74 feet along the southern limit of the 
        existing project to the point of origin.
            (B) The 15- and 35-foot deep channels beginning at a point 
        on the southern limit of the existing project, N457163.41, 
        E739903.49, thence running northerly about 111.99 feet to a 
        point, N457275.37, E739900.76, thence running westerly about 
        692.37 feet to a point N457303.40, E739208.96, thence running 
        southwesterly about 190.01 feet to another point on the 
        southern limit of the existing project, N457233.17, E739032.41, 
        thence running easterly about 873.87 feet along the southern 
        limit of the existing project to the point of origin.
        (18) Cocheco river, new hampshire.--
            (A) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
        Cocheco River, New Hampshire, authorized by the 1st section of 
        the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the 
        construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works 
        on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
        September 19, 1890 (26 Stat. 436), and consisting of a 7-foot 
        deep channel that lies northerly of a line the coordinates of 
        which are N255292.31, E713095.36, and N255334.51, E713138.01.
            (B) Maintenance dredging.--Not later than 18 months after 
        the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        perform maintenance dredging for the remaining authorized 
        portions of the Federal navigation channel under the project 
        described in subparagraph (A) to restore authorized channel 
        dimensions.
        (19) Morristown harbor, new york.--The portion of the project 
    for navigation, Morristown Harbor, New York, authorized by the 1st 
    section of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, 
    repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
    harbors, and for other purposes'', approved January 21, 1927 (44 
    Stat. 1014), that lies north of the northern boundary of Morris 
    Street extended.
        (20) Oswegatchie river, ogdensburg, new york.--The portion of 
    the Federal channel of the project for navigation, Ogdensburg 
    Harbor, New York, authorized by the 1st section of the Act entitled 
    ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
    preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
    other purposes'', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 635), and 
    modified by the 1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act 
    authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain 
    public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
    approved August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1037), that is in the 
    Oswegatchie River in Ogdensburg, New York, from the southernmost 
    alignment of the Route 68 bridge upstream to the northernmost 
    alignment of the Lake Street bridge.
        (21) Conneaut harbor, ohio.--The most southerly 300 feet of the 
    1,670-foot long Shore Arm of the project for navigation, Conneaut 
    Harbor, Ohio, authorized by the 1st section of the Act entitled 
    ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
    preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
    other purposes'', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 653).
        (22) Lorain small boat basin, lake erie, ohio.--The portion of 
    the Federal navigation channel, Lorain Small Boat Basin, Lake Erie, 
    Ohio, authorized pursuant to section 107 of the River and Harbor 
    Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577) that is situated in the State of Ohio, 
    County of Lorain, Township of Black River and is a part of Original 
    Black River Township Lot Number 1, Tract Number 1, further known as 
    being submerged lands of Lake Erie owned by the State of Ohio, and 
    that is more definitely described as follows:
            Commencing at a drill hole found on the centerline of 
        Lakeside Avenue (60 feet in width) at the intersection of the 
        centerline of the East Shorearm of Lorain Harbor, that point 
        being known as United States Corps of Engineers Monument No. 
        203 (N658012.20, E208953.88).
            Thence, in a line north 75 degrees 26 minutes 12 seconds 
        west, a distance of 387.87 feet to a point (N658109.73, 
        E2089163.47). This point is hereinafter in this paragraph 
        referred to as the ``principal point of beginning''.
            Thence, north 58 degrees 14 minutes 11 seconds west, a 
        distance of 50.00 feet to a point (N658136.05, E2089120.96).
            Thence, south 67 degrees 49 minutes 32 seconds west, a 
        distance of 665.16 feet to a point (N657885.00, E2088505.00).
            Thence, north 88 degrees 13 minutes 52 seconds west, a 
        distance of 551.38 feet to a point (N657902.02, E2087953.88).
            Thence, north 29 degrees 17 minutes 42 seconds east, a 
        distance of 114.18 feet to a point (N658001.60, E2088009.75).
            Thence, south 88 degrees 11 minutes 40 seconds east, a 
        distance of 477.00 feet to a point (N657986.57, E2088486.51).
            Thence, north 68 degrees 11 minutes 06 seconds east, a 
        distance of 601.95 feet to a point (N658210.26, E2089045.35).
            Thence, north 35 degrees 11 minutes 34 seconds east, a 
        distance of 89.58 feet to a point (N658283.47, E2089096.98).
            Thence, south 20 degrees 56 minutes 30 seconds east, a 
        distance of 186.03 feet to the principal point of beginning 
        (N658109.73, E2089163.47) and containing within such bounds 
        2.81 acres, more or less, of submerged land.
        (23) Apponaug cove, rhode island.--The following portion of the 
    project for navigation, Apponaug Cove, Rhode Island, authorized by 
    section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480), 
    consisting of the 6-foot deep channel: Beginning at a point, 
    N223269.93, E513089.12, thence running northwesterly to a point 
    N223348.31, E512799.54, thence running southwesterly to a point 
    N223251.78, E512773.41, thence running southeasterly to a point 
    N223178.00, E513046.00, thence running northeasterly to the point 
    of beginning.
        (24) Port washington harbor, wisconsin.--The following portion 
    of the navigation project for Port Washington Harbor, Wisconsin, 
    authorized by the 1st section of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
    appropriations for the repair, preservation, and completion of 
    certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes, 
    for the fiscal year ending June thirtieth, eighteen hundred and 
    seventy-one'', approved July 11, 1870 (16 Stat. 223): Beginning at 
    the northwest corner of the project at Channel Pt. No. 36, of the 
    Federal Navigation Project, Port Washington Harbor, Ozaukee County, 
    Wisconsin, at coordinates N513529.68, E2535215.64, thence 188 
    degrees 31 minutes 59 seconds, a distance of 178.32 feet, thence 
    196 degrees 47 minutes 17 seconds, a distance of 574.80 feet, 
    thence 270 degrees 58 minutes 25 seconds, a distance of 465.50 
    feet, thence 178 degrees 56 minutes 17 seconds, a distance of 
    130.05 feet, thence 87 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds, a distance of 
    510.22 feet, thence 104 degrees 58 minutes 31 seconds, a distance 
    of 178.33 feet, thence 115 degrees 47 minutes 55 seconds, a 
    distance of 244.15 feet, thence 25 degrees 12 minutes 08 seconds, a 
    distance of 310.00 feet, thence 294 degrees 46 minutes 50 seconds, 
    a distance of 390.20 feet, thence 16 degrees 56 minutes 16 seconds, 
    a distance of 570.90 feet, thence 266 degrees 01 minutes 25 
    seconds, a distance of 190.78 feet to Channel Pt. No. 36, the point 
    of beginning.

SEC. 365. MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LOUISIANA.

    The Mississippi Delta Region project, Louisiana, authorized as part 
of the project for hurricane-flood protection on Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1077), is modified to direct the Secretary to provide a credit to the 
State of Louisiana toward its non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project. The credit shall be for the cost incurred by the State in 
developing and relocating oyster beds to offset the adverse impacts on 
active and productive oyster beds in the Davis Pond project area. The 
credit shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary 
deems necessary and shall not exceed $7,500,000.

SEC. 366. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may make available to the Southwestern Pennsylvania 
Growth Fund (a regional industrial development corporation) at no 
additional cost to the United States, dredged and excavated materials 
resulting from construction of the new gated dam at Braddock, 
Pennsylvania, as part of the Locks and Dams 2, 3, and 4, Monongahela 
River, Pennsylvania, navigation project, to support environmental 
restoration of the former United States Steel Duquesne Works brownfield 
site--
        (1) if the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection 
    issues a ``no further action'' decision or a mitigation plan for 
    the site prior to a determination by the District Engineer, 
    Pittsburgh District, that the dredged and excavated materials are 
    available; and
        (2) if the Southwestern Pennsylvania Growth Fund agrees to hold 
    and save the United States free from damages in connection with use 
    of the dredged and excavated materials, except for damages due to 
    the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 401. CORPS CAPABILITY STUDY, ALASKA.

    Not later than 18 months after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary shall report to Congress on the advisability and 
capability of the Corps of Engineers to implement rural sanitation 
projects for rural and Native villages in Alaska.

SEC. 402. RED RIVER, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall--
        (1) conduct a study to determine the feasibility of carrying 
    out a project to permit navigation on the Red River in southwest 
    Arkansas; and
        (2) in conducting the study, analyze economic benefits that 
    were not included in the limited economic analysis contained in the 
    reconnaissance report for the project dated November 1995.

SEC. 403. MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN, ARIZONA.

    The Secretary shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the feasibility study on the McDowell Mountain, Arizona, project an 
amount equal to the cost of work performed by the city of Scottsdale, 
Arizona, and accomplished prior to the city's entering into an 
agreement with the Secretary if the Secretary determines that the work 
is necessary for the study.

SEC. 404. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, ARIZONA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the relationship 
of flooding in Nogales, Arizona, and floodflows emanating from Mexico.
    (b) Report.--The Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on 
the results of the study conducted under subsection (a), together with 
recommendations concerning the appropriate level of non-Federal 
participation in the project for flood control, Nogales Wash and 
tributaries, Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606).

SEC. 405. GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to assess the feasibility of 
implementing improvements in the regional flood control system within 
Garden Grove, California.

SEC. 406. MUGU LAGOON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
environmental impacts associated with sediment transport, floodflows, 
and upstream watershed land use practices on Mugu Lagoon, California. 
The study shall include an evaluation of alternatives for the 
restoration of the estuarine ecosystem functions and values associated 
with Mugu Lagoon and the endangered and threatened species inhabiting 
the area.
    (b) Consultation and Coordination.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of the Navy and shall 
coordinate with State and local resource agencies to ensure that the 
study is compatible with restoration efforts for the Calleguas Creek 
watershed.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study.

SEC. 407. MURRIETA CREEK, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall review the completed feasibility study of the 
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, 
including identified alternatives, concerning Murrieta Creek from 
Temecula to Wildomar, Riverside County, California, to determine the 
Federal interest in participating in a project for flood control.

SEC. 408. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION, 
              CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall study the advisability of fish and wildlife 
habitat improvement measures identified for further study by the Pine 
Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration Investigation 
Reconnaissance Report.

SEC. 409. SANTA YNEZ, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Planning.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare a comprehensive 
river basin management plan addressing the long-term ecological, 
economic, and flood control needs of the Santa Ynez River Basin, 
California. In preparing such plan, the Secretary shall consult with 
the Santa Barbara Flood Control District and other affected local 
governmental entities.
    (b) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide technical 
assistance to the Santa Barbara Flood Control District with respect to 
implementation of the plan to be prepared under subsection (a).

SEC. 410. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INFRASTRUCTURE.

    (a) Assistance.--Section 116(d)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4623) is amended--
        (1) in the heading of paragraph (1) by inserting ``and 
    assistance'' after ``Study''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following: ``In addition, the 
    Secretary shall provide technical assistance to non-Federal 
    interests in developing potential infrastructure projects. The non-
    Federal share of the cost of the technical assistance shall be 25 
    percent.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 116(d)(3) of such Act 
is amended by striking ``$1,500,000'' and inserting ``$3,000,000''.

SEC. 411. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Bear Creek Drainage and Mormon Slough/Calaveras River.--The 
Secretary shall conduct a review of the Bear Creek Drainage, San 
Joaquin County, California, and the Mormon Slough/Calaveras River, 
California, projects for flood control authorized by section 10 of the 
Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public 
works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 901), to develop a 
comprehensive plan for additional flood damage reduction measures for 
the city of Stockton, California, and surrounding areas.
    (b) Farmington Dam, California.--
        (1) Conjunctive use study.--The Secretary shall continue 
    participation in the Stockton, California, Metropolitan Area Flood 
    Control Study, including an evaluation of the feasibility of 
    storage of water at Farmington Dam and implementation of a 
    conjunctive use plan.
        (2) Consultation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
    consult with the Stockton East Water District concerning joint 
    operation or potential transfer of Farmington Dam.
        (3) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a report to 
    Congress--
            (A) concerning the feasibility of a conjunctive use plan 
        using Farmington Dam for water storage; and
            (B) containing recommendations on facility transfers and 
        operational alternatives.
        (4) Without project condition.--In conducting the Stockton, 
    California, Metropolitan Area Flood Control Study, the Secretary 
    shall consider the physical flood control and water supply 
    facilities as they existed in January 1996 as the ``without 
    project'' condition.

SEC. 412. YOLO BYPASS, SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall study the advisability of acquiring land in the 
vicinity of the Yolo Bypass in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, 
California, for the purpose of environmental mitigation for the flood 
control project for Sacramento, California, and other water resources 
projects in the area.

SEC. 413. WEST DADE, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the 
Federal interest in using the West Dade, Florida, reuse facility to 
improve water quality in, and increase the supply of surface water to, 
the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife habitat.

SEC. 414. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study 
to address the current and future needs for flood damage prevention and 
reduction, water supply, and other related water resources needs in the 
Savannah River Basin.
    (b) Scope.--The scope of the study shall be limited to an analysis 
of water resources issues that fall within the traditional civil works 
mission of the Corps of Engineers.
    (c) Coordination.--Notwithstanding subsection (b), the Secretary 
shall ensure that the study is coordinated with the Environmental 
Protection Agency and the ongoing watershed study of the Savannah River 
Basin by the Agency.

SEC. 415. CHAIN OF ROCKS CANAL, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall complete a limited reevaluation of the 
authorized St. Louis Harbor Project in the vicinity of the Chain of 
Rocks Canal, Illinois, consistent with the authorized purposes of that 
project, to include evacuation of waters collecting on the land side of 
the Chain of Rocks Canal East Levee.

SEC. 416. QUINCY, ILLINOIS.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall study and evaluate the critical 
water infrastructure of the Fabius River Drainage District, the South 
Quincy Drainage and Levee District, the Sny Island Levee Drainage 
District, and the city of Quincy, Illinois--
        (1) to determine if additional flood protection needs of such 
    infrastructure should be identified or implemented;
        (2) to develop a definition of critical water infrastructure;
        (3) to develop evaluation criteria; and
        (4) to enhance existing geographic information system databases 
    to encompass relevant data that identify critical water 
    infrastructure for use in emergencies and in routine operation and 
    maintenance activities.
    (b) Consideration of Other Studies.--In conducting the study under 
this section, the Secretary shall consider the recommendations of the 
Interagency Floodplain Management Committee Report, the findings of the 
Floodplain Management Assessment of the Upper Mississippi River and 
Lower Missouri Rivers and Tributaries, and other relevant studies and 
findings.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study, together with recommendations regarding each of 
the objectives of the study described in paragraphs (1) through (4) of 
subsection (a).

SEC. 417. SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall provide assistance to the city of Springfield, 
Illinois, in developing--
        (1) an environmental impact statement for the proposed 
    development of a water supply reservoir, including the preparation 
    of necessary documentation in support of the environmental impact 
    statement; and
        (2) an evaluation of the technical, economic, and environmental 
    impacts of such development.

SEC. 418. BEAUTY CREEK WATERSHED, VALPARAISO CITY, PORTER COUNTY, 
              INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to assess the feasibility of 
implementing streambank erosion control measures and flood control 
measures within the Beauty Creek watershed, Valparaiso City, Porter 
County, Indiana.

SEC. 419. GRAND CALUMET RIVER, HAMMOND, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to establish a 
methodology and schedule to restore the wetlands at Wolf Lake and 
George Lake in Hammond, Indiana.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 420. INDIANA HARBOR CANAL, EAST CHICAGO, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of including 
environmental and recreational features, including a vegetation buffer, 
as part of the project for navigation, Indiana Harbor Canal, East 
Chicago, Lake County, Indiana, authorized by the 1st section of the Act 
entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, 
and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 657).

SEC. 421. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of 
implementing measures to restore Koontz Lake, Indiana, including 
measures to remove silt, sediment, nutrients, aquatic growth, and other 
noxious materials from Koontz Lake, measures to improve public access 
facilities to Koontz Lake, and measures to prevent or abate the deposit 
of sediments and nutrients in Koontz Lake.

SEC. 422. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the impacts of 
the project for flood control, Little Calumet River, Indiana, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4115), on flooding and water quality in the vicinity of 
the Black Oak area of Gary, Indiana.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study conducted under subsection (a), together with 
recommendations for cost-effective remediation of impacts described in 
subsection (a).
    (c) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the study to 
be conducted under subsection (a) shall be 100 percent.

SEC. 423. TIPPECANOE RIVER WATERSHED, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of water quality 
and environmental restoration needs in the Tippecanoe River watershed, 
Indiana, including measures necessary to reduce siltation in Lake 
Shafer and Lake Freeman.
    (b) Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide technical, planning, 
and design assistance to the Shafer and Freeman Lakes Environmental 
Conservation Corporation in addressing potential environmental 
restoration activities determined appropriate as a result of the study 
conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 424. CALCASIEU RIVER, HACKBERRY, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall incorporate the portion of the Calcasieu River 
in the vicinity of Hackberry, Louisiana, as part of the overall study 
of the Lake Charles ship channel, bypass channel, and general anchorage 
area in Louisiana, to explore the possibility of constructing 
additional anchorage areas.

SEC. 425. MORGANZA, LOUISIANA, TO GULF OF MEXICO.

    (a) Study.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the 
    environmental, flood control, and navigational impacts associated 
    with the construction of a lock structure in the Houma Navigation 
    Canal as an independent feature of the overall flood damage 
    prevention study being conducted under the Morganza, Louisiana, to 
    the Gulf of Mexico feasibility study.
        (2) Considerations.--In conducting the study under paragraph 
    (1), the Secretary shall--
            (A) consult with the South Terrebonne Tidewater Management 
        and Conservation District and consider the District's 
        Preliminary Design Document dated February 1994; and
            (B) evaluate the findings of the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands 
        Conservation and Restoration Task Force, established under the 
        Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (16 
        U.S.C. 3951 et seq.), relating to the lock structure.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report on the results of the study conducted under subsection (a), 
together with recommendations for immediate implementation of the 
study.

SEC. 426. HURON RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
and need for channel improvements and associated modifications for the 
purpose of providing a harbor of refuge at Huron River, Michigan.

SEC. 427. CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the 
Federal interest in channel improvements in channel A of the North Las 
Vegas Wash in the city of North Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada, for 
the purpose of flood control.

SEC. 428. LOWER LAS VEGAS WASH WETLANDS, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the advisability 
of wetland restoration and the feasibility of erosion control in the 
Lower Las Vegas Wash, Nevada.

SEC. 429. NORTHERN NEVADA.

    The Secretary shall conduct reconnaissance studies, in the State of 
Nevada, of--
        (1) the Humboldt River and its tributaries and outlets;
        (2) the Truckee River and its tributaries and outlets;
        (3) the Carson River and its tributaries and outlets; and
        (4) the Walker River and its tributaries and outlets,
in order to determine the Federal interest in flood control, 
environmental restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife, 
recreation, water conservation, water quality, and toxic and 
radioactive waste.

SEC. 430. SACO RIVER, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of flooding problems along the 
Saco River in Hart's Location, New Hampshire, for the purpose of 
evaluating retaining walls, berms, and other structures with a view to 
potential solutions involving repair or replacement of existing 
structures. In conducting the study, the Secretary shall also consider 
other alternatives for flood damage reduction.

SEC. 431. BUFFALO RIVER GREENWAY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
a potential greenway trail project along the Buffalo River between the 
park system of the city of Buffalo, New York, and Lake Erie. Such study 
may include preparation of an integrated plan of development that takes 
into consideration the adjacent parks, nature preserves, bikeways, and 
related recreational facilities.

SEC. 432. COEYMANS, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the 
Federal interest in reopening the secondary channel of the Hudson River 
in the town of Coeymans, New York, which has been narrowed by silt as a 
result of the construction of Coeymans middle dike by the Corps of 
Engineers.

SEC. 433. NEW YORK BIGHT AND HARBOR STUDY.

    Section 326(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4851) is amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting 
``$3,000,000''.

SEC. 434. PORT OF NEWBURGH, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the feasibility of carrying 
out improvements for navigation at the port of Newburgh, New York.

SEC. 435. PORT OF NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY NAVIGATION STUDY.

    The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of navigation 
needs at the Port of New York-New Jersey (including the South Brooklyn 
Marine and Red Hook Container Terminals, Staten Island, and adjacent 
areas) to address improvements, including deepening of existing 
channels to depths of 50 feet or greater, that are required to provide 
economically efficient and environmentally sound navigation to meet 
current and future requirements.

SEC. 436. SHINNECOCK INLET, NEW YORK.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary shall conduct a reconnaissance study in Shinnecock Inlet, 
New York, to determine the feasibility of constructing a sand bypass 
system, or other appropriate alternative, for the purposes of allowing 
sand to flow in its natural east-to-west pattern and preventing the 
further erosion of the beaches west of the inlet and the shoaling of 
the inlet.

SEC. 437. CHAGRIN RIVER, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of flooding problems along the 
Chagrin River in Eastlake, Ohio. In conducting such study, the 
Secretary shall evaluate potential solutions to flooding from all 
sources, including that resulting from ice jams, and shall evaluate the 
feasibility of a sedimentation collection pit and other potential 
measures to reduce flooding.

SEC. 438. CUYAHOGA RIVER, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to evaluate the integrity of 
the bulkhead system located on the Federal channel along the Cuyahoga 
River in the vicinity of Cleveland, Ohio, and shall provide to the non-
Federal interest an analysis of costs and repairs of the bulkhead 
system.

SEC. 439. COLUMBIA SLOUGH, OREGON.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary, in consultation with the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, shall complete a feasibility study for 
the ecosystem restoration project at Columbia Slough, Oregon.

SEC. 440. CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Charleston estuary area 
located in Charleston, Berkeley, and Dorchester Counties, South 
Carolina, for the purpose of evaluating environmental conditions in the 
tidal reaches of the Ashley, Cooper, Stono, and Wando Rivers and the 
lower portions of Charleston Harbor.

SEC. 441. OAHE DAM TO LAKE SHARPE, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall investigate potential solutions to the 
recurring flooding and related problems in the vicinity of Pierre and 
Ft. Pierre, South Dakota, caused by sedimentation in Lake Sharpe. The 
potential solutions to be investigated shall include lowering of the 
lake level and sediment agitation to allow for resuspension and 
movement of the sediment. The investigation shall include development 
of a comprehensive solution which includes consideration of structural 
and nonstructural measures upstream from the lake consisting of land 
treatment, sediment retention structures, and such other measures as 
the Secretary determines to be appropriate.

SEC. 442. MUSTANG ISLAND, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of navigation along the south-
central coast of Texas near Corpus Christi for the purpose of 
determining the feasibility of constructing and maintaining the Packery 
Channel on the southern portion of Mustang Island.

SEC. 443. PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of flooding, erosion, and other 
water resources problems in Prince William County, Virginia, including 
an assessment of wetland protection, erosion control, and flood damage 
reduction needs of the county.

SEC. 444. PACIFIC REGION.

    The Secretary may conduct studies in the interest of navigation in 
that part of the Pacific region that includes American Samoa, Guam, and 
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

SEC. 445. FINANCING OF INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS OF SMALL AND MEDIUM PORTS.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall study the feasibility of 
alternative financing mechanisms for ensuring adequate funding for the 
infrastructure needs of small and medium ports.
    (b) Mechanisms To Be Studied.--Mechanisms to be studied under 
subsection (a) shall include the establishment of revolving loan funds.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report containing the results of the study conducted under subsection 
(a).

SEC. 446. EVALUATION OF BEACH MATERIAL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior 
shall evaluate procedures and requirements used in the selection and 
approval of materials to be used in the restoration and nourishment of 
beaches. Such evaluation shall address the potential effects of 
changing existing procedures and requirements on the implementation of 
beach restoration and nourishment projects and on the aquatic 
environment.
    (b) Consultation.--In conducting the evaluation under this section, 
the Secretaries shall consult with appropriate Federal and State 
agencies.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretaries shall transmit a report to 
Congress on their findings under this section.
    (d) Effect on Authority of Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing in 
this section is intended to affect the authority of the Secretary of 
the Interior under section 8(k) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands 
Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)).

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 501. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Village Creek, Alabama.--
        (1) In general.--Upon a determination by the Secretary that 
    construction of facilities associated with a commercial enterprise 
    is not inconsistent with the operation of the project for flood 
    control, Village Creek, Alabama, authorized by section 410(a) of 
    the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4111), the 
    non-Federal interest with respect to the project may sell to 
    private interests a parcel of land consisting of approximately 18 
    acres for the purpose of constructing facilities associated with a 
    commercial enterprise.
        (2) Land description.--The land to be conveyed under paragraph 
    (1) shall consist of approximately 43 individual tracts that are 
    bounded on the west by Coosa Street, on the south by 16th Avenue 
    North, on the east by Tallapoosa Street, and on the north by the 
    northern boundary of lands acquired for the project.
        (3) Facilities.--The facilities shall be constructed in 
    accordance with local floodplain ordinances and shall not increase 
    flood risks of other residents in the Village Creek floodplain.
        (4) Reimbursement.--The non-Federal interest shall reimburse 
    the Secretary the Federal cost of acquiring the lands to be 
    conveyed, including relocation assistance, demolition of 
    structures, and administrative costs.
        (5) Remaining lands.--All remaining lands acquired for the 
    Village Creek flood control project shall remain in public 
    ownership and shall be used solely for recreation purposes or 
    maintained as open space.
    (b) Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal Property, California.--Section 
205 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4633) is 
amended--
        (1) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
        ``(3) To adjacent land owners, the United States title to all 
    or portions of that part of the Oakland Inner Harbor Tidal Canal 
    that are located within the boundaries of the city in which such 
    canal rests. Such conveyance shall be at fair market value.'';
        (2) by inserting after ``right-of-way'' the following: ``or 
    other rights considered necessary by the Secretary''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following: ``The conveyances and 
    processes involved shall be at no cost to the United States.''.
    (c) Mariemont, Ohio.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the village of 
    Mariemont, Ohio, at fair market value all right, title, and 
    interest of the United States in and to a parcel of land (including 
    improvements to the parcel) under the jurisdiction of the Corps of 
    Engineers, known as the ``Ohio River Division Laboratory'', and 
    described in paragraph (4).
        (2) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance under paragraph (1) 
    shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary 
    considers necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the 
    United States.
        (3) Proceeds.--All proceeds from the conveyance under paragraph 
    (1) shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury of the 
    United States and credited as miscellaneous receipts.
        (4) Property description.--The parcel of land referred to in 
    paragraph (1) is the parcel situated in the State of Ohio, County 
    of Hamilton, Township 4, Fractional Range 2, Miami Purchase, 
    Columbia Township, Section 15, being parts of Lots 5 and 6 of the 
    subdivision of the dower tract of the estate of Joseph Ferris as 
    recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 112, of the Plat Records of Hamilton 
    County, Ohio, Recorder's Office, and more particularly described as 
    follows:
            Beginning at an iron pin set to mark the intersection of 
        the easterly line of Lot 5 of said subdivision of said dower 
        tract with the northerly line of the right-of-way of the 
        Norfolk and Western Railway Company as shown in Plat Book 27, 
        Page 182, Hamilton County, Ohio, Surveyor's Office.
            Thence with said northerly right-of-way line south 70 
        degrees, 10 minutes, 13 seconds west 258.52 feet to a point.
            Thence leaving the northerly right-of-way of the Norfolk 
        and Western Railway Company north 18 degrees, 22 minutes, 02 
        seconds west 302.31 feet to a point in the south line of 
        Mariemont Avenue.
            Thence along said south line north 72 degrees, 34 minutes, 
        35 seconds east 167.50 feet to a point.
            Thence leaving the south line of Mariemont Avenue north 17 
        degrees, 25 minutes, 25 seconds west 49.00 feet to a point.
            Thence north 72 degrees, 34 minutes, 35 seconds east 100.00 
        feet to a point.
            Thence south 17 degrees, 25 minutes, 25 seconds east 49.00 
        feet to a point.
            Thence north 72 degrees, 34 minutes, 35 seconds east 238.90 
        feet to a point.
            Thence south 00 degrees, 52 minutes, 07 seconds east 297.02 
        feet to a point in the northerly line of the Norfolk and 
        Western Railway Company.
            Thence with said northerly right-of-way south 70 degrees, 
        10 minutes, 13 seconds west 159.63 feet to a point of 
        beginning, containing 3.22 acres, more or less.
    (d) Pike Island Locks and Dam, Ohio.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to this subsection, the Secretary 
    shall convey by quitclaim deed to the city of Steubenville, Ohio, 
    all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
    approximately 12 acres of land located at the Pike Island Locks and 
    Dam, together with any improvements on the land.
        (2) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance by the United States 
    under this subsection shall be subject to such terms and conditions 
    as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
    the United States.
        (3) Legal description of real property and payment of costs.--
    The exact acreage and legal description of the real property 
    described in paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
    satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be 
    borne by the city of Steubenville. The city shall also be 
    responsible for any other costs associated with the conveyance 
    authorized by this subsection.
        (4) Consideration of certain properties.--Properties to be 
    conveyed under this subsection that will be retained in public 
    ownership and used for public park and recreation or other public 
    purposes shall be conveyed without consideration. If any such 
    property is no longer used for public park and recreation or other 
    public purposes, title to such property shall revert to the 
    Secretary.
    (e) Shenango River Lake Project, Ohio.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to this subsection, the Secretary 
    shall convey by quitclaim deed to the Kinsman Township, Trumbull 
    County, Ohio, all right, title, and interest of the United States 
    in and to a parcel of land located at the Shenango River Lake 
    project consisting of approximately 1 acre, together with any 
    improvements on the land.
        (2) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance by the United States 
    under this subsection shall be subject to such terms and conditions 
    as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
    the United States.
        (3) Legal description of real property and payment of costs.--
    The exact acreage and legal description of the real property 
    described in paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
    satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be 
    borne by the Kinsman Township. The township shall also be 
    responsible for any other costs associated with the conveyance 
    authorized by this subsection.
        (4) Consideration of certain properties.--Properties to be 
    conveyed under this subsection that will be retained in public 
    ownership and used for public park and recreation or other public 
    purposes shall be conveyed without consideration. If any such 
    property is no longer used for public park and recreation or other 
    public purposes, title to such property shall revert to the 
    Secretary.
    (f) Eufaula Lake, Oklahoma.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
    Eufaula, Oklahoma, all right, title, and interest of the United 
    States in and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 12.5 
    acres located at the Eufaula Lake project.
        (2) Consideration.--Consideration for the conveyance under 
    paragraph (1) shall be the fair market value of the parcel (as 
    determined by the Secretary) and payment of all costs of the United 
    States in making the conveyance, including the costs of--
            (A) the surveys required under paragraphs (3) and (4);
            (B) any other necessary survey or survey monumentation;
            (C) compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act 
        of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and
            (D) any coordination necessary with respect to requirements 
        relating to endangered species, cultural resources, and clean 
        air (including the costs of agency consultation and public 
        hearings).
        (3) Land surveys.--The exact acreage and description of the 
    parcel to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be determined by 
    such surveys as the Secretary considers necessary. Such surveys 
    shall be carried out to the satisfaction of the Secretary.
        (4) Environmental baseline survey.--Prior to making the 
    conveyance under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall conduct an 
    environmental baseline survey to determine the levels of any 
    contamination (as of the date of the survey) for which the United 
    States would be responsible under the Comprehensive Environmental 
    Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 
    et seq.) and any other applicable law.
        (5) Conditions concerning rights and easement.--The conveyance 
    under paragraph (1) shall be subject to existing rights and to 
    retention by the United States of a flowage easement over all 
    portions of the parcel that lie at or below the flowage easement 
    contour for the Eufaula Lake project.
        (6) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under paragraph 
    (1) shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as the 
    Secretary considers necessary and appropriate to protect the 
    interests of the United States.
    (g) Boardman, Oregon.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the city of 
    Boardman, Oregon, all right, title, and interest of the United 
    States in and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 141 
    acres acquired as part of the John Day Lock and Dam project in the 
    vicinity of such city currently under lease to the Boardman Park 
    and Recreation District.
        (2) Consideration.--
            (A) Park and recreation properties.--Properties to be 
        conveyed under this subsection that will be retained in public 
        ownership and used for public park and recreation purposes 
        shall be conveyed without consideration. If any such property 
        is no longer used for public park and recreation purposes, 
        title to such property shall revert to the Secretary.
            (B) Other properties.--Properties to be conveyed under this 
        subsection and not described in subparagraph (A) shall be 
        conveyed at fair market value.
        (3) Conditions concerning rights and easement.--The conveyance 
    of properties under this subsection shall be subject to existing 
    first rights of refusal regarding acquisition of the properties and 
    to retention of a flowage easement over portions of the properties 
    that the Secretary determines to be necessary for operation of the 
    project.
        (4) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance of properties 
    under this subsection shall be subject to such other terms and 
    conditions as the Secretary considers necessary and appropriate to 
    protect the interests of the United States.
    (h) Benbrook Lake, Texas.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey all right, title, 
    and interest of the United States in and to a parcel of real 
    property located at Longhorn Park, also known as ``Pecan Valley 
    Park'', Benbrook Lake, Benbrook, Texas, consisting of approximately 
    50 acres.
        (2) Consideration.--Consideration for the conveyance under 
    paragraph (1) shall be the fair market value of the real property 
    as determined by the Secretary. All costs associated with the 
    conveyance under paragraph (1) and such other costs as the 
    Secretary considers appropriate shall be borne by the purchaser.
        (3) Description of property.--The exact acreage and legal 
    description of the parcel of real property to be conveyed under 
    paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 
    Secretary. The cost of the survey shall be borne by the purchaser.
        (4) Additional terms.--The Secretary may require such 
    additional terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance 
    under paragraph (1) as the Secretary considers appropriate to 
    protect the interests of the United States.
        (5) Compliance with national environmental policy act.--Prior 
    to the conveyance of property under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
    shall ensure that the conveyance complies with the National 
    Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (i) Tri-Cities Area, Washington.--
        (1) General authority.--As soon as practicable after the date 
    of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall make the 
    conveyances to the local governments referred to in paragraph (2) 
    of all right, title, and interest of the United States in and to 
    the property described in paragraph (2).
        (2) Property descriptions.--
            (A) Benton county, washington.--The property to be conveyed 
        pursuant to paragraph (1) to Benton County, Washington, is the 
        property in such county that is designated ``Area D'' on 
        Exhibit A to Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-81-43.
            (B) Franklin county, washington.--The property to be 
        conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1) to Franklin County, 
        Washington, is--
                (i) the 105.01 acres of property leased pursuant to 
            Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-20 as executed by Franklin 
            County, Washington, on April 7, 1977;
                (ii) the 35 acres of property leased pursuant to 
            Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-
            77-20;
                (iii) the 20 acres of property commonly known as 
            ``Richland Bend'', which is designated by the shaded 
            portion of Lot 1, Section 11, and the shaded portion of Lot 
            1, Section 12, Township 9 North, Range 28 East, W.M. on 
            Exhibit D to Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to Army Lease No. 
            DACW-68-1-77-20;
                (iv) the 7.05 acres of property commonly known as 
            ``Taylor Flat'', which is designated by the shaded portion 
            of Lot 1, Section 13, Township 11 North, Range 28 East, 
            W.M. on Exhibit D to Supplemental Agreement No. 2 to Army 
            Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-20;
                (v) the 14.69 acres of property commonly known as 
            ``Byers Landing'', which is designated by the shaded 
            portion of Lots 2 and 3, Section 2, Township 10 North, 
            Range 28 East, W.M. on Exhibit D to Supplemental Agreement 
            No. 2 to Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-20; and
                (vi) all levees within Franklin County, Washington, as 
            of the date of the enactment of this Act, and the property 
            on which the levees are situated.
            (C) City of kennewick, washington.--The property to be 
        conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1) to the city of Kennewick, 
        Washington, is the property in the city that is subject to the 
        Municipal Sublease Agreement entered into on April 6, 1989, 
        between Benton County, Washington, and the cities of Kennewick 
        and Richland, Washington.
            (D) City of richland, washington.--The property to be 
        conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1) to the city of Richland, 
        Washington, is the property in the city that is subject to the 
        Municipal Sublease Agreement entered into on April 6, 1989, 
        between Benton County, Washington, and the cities of Kennewick 
        and Richland, Washington.
            (E) City of pasco, washington.--The property to be conveyed 
        pursuant to paragraph (1) to the city of Pasco, Washington, 
        is--
                (i) the property in the city of Pasco, Washington, that 
            is leased pursuant to Army Lease No. DACW-68-1-77-10; and
                (ii) all levees in the city, as of the date of the 
            enactment of this Act, and the property on which the levees 
            are situated.
            (F) Port of pasco, washington.--The property to be conveyed 
        pursuant to paragraph (1) to the Port of Pasco, Washington, 
        is--
                (i) the property owned by the United States that is 
            south of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks in Lots 1 
            and 2, Section 20, Township 9 North, Range 31 East, W.M.; 
            and
                (ii) the property owned by the United States that is 
            south of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks in Lots 1, 
            2, 3, and 4, in each of Sections 21, 22, and 23, Township 9 
            North, Range 31 East, W.M.
            (G) Additional properties.--In addition to properties 
        described in subparagraphs (A) through (F), the Secretary may 
        convey to a local government referred to in subparagraphs (A) 
        through (F) such properties under the jurisdiction of the 
        Secretary in the Tri-Cities area as the Secretary and the local 
        government agree are appropriate for conveyance.
        (3) Terms and conditions.--
            (A) In general.--The conveyances under paragraph (1) shall 
        be subject to such terms and conditions, including payment of 
        reasonable administrative costs, as the Secretary considers 
        necessary and appropriate to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
            (B) Special rule for franklin county.--The property 
        described in paragraph (2)(B)(vi) shall be conveyed only after 
        Franklin County, Washington, has entered into a written 
        agreement with the Secretary that provides that the United 
        States shall continue to operate and maintain the flood control 
        drainage areas and pump stations on the property conveyed and 
        that the United States shall be provided all easements and 
        rights necessary to carry out that agreement.
            (C) Special rule for city of pasco.--The property described 
        in paragraph (2)(E)(ii) shall be conveyed only after the city 
        of Pasco, Washington, has entered into a written agreement with 
        the Secretary that provides that the United States shall 
        continue to operate and maintain the flood control drainage 
        areas and pump stations on the property conveyed and that the 
        United States shall be provided all easements and rights 
        necessary to carry out that agreement.
            (D) Consideration.--
                (i) Park and recreation properties.--Properties to be 
            conveyed under this subsection that will be retained in 
            public ownership and used for public park and recreation 
            purposes shall be conveyed without consideration. If any 
            such property is no longer used for public park and 
            recreation purposes, title to such property shall revert to 
            the Secretary.
                (ii) Other properties.--Properties to be conveyed under 
            this subsection and not described in clause (i) shall be 
            conveyed at fair market value.
        (4) Lake wallula levees.--
            (A) Determination of minimum safe height.--
                (i) Contract.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
            the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall contract 
            with a private entity agreed to under clause (ii) to 
            determine, within 6 months after that date, the minimum 
            safe height for the levees of the project for flood 
            control, Lake Wallula, Washington. The Secretary shall have 
            final approval of the minimum safe height.
                (ii) Agreement of local officials.--A contract shall be 
            entered into under clause (i) only with a private entity 
            agreed to by the Secretary, appropriate representatives of 
            Franklin County, Washington, and appropriate 
            representatives of the city of Pasco, Washington.
            (B) Authority.--A local government may reduce, at its cost, 
        the height of any levee of the project for flood control, Lake 
        Wallula, Washington, within the boundaries of the area under 
        the jurisdiction of such local government to a height not lower 
        than the minimum safe height determined pursuant to 
        subparagraph (A).
    (j) Applicability of Other Laws.--Any contract for sale, deed, or 
other transfer of real property under this section shall be carried out 
in compliance with all applicable provisions of section 120(h) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act 
of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)) and other environmental laws.

SEC. 502. NAMINGS.

    (a) Milt Brandt Visitors Center, California.--
        (1) Designation.--The visitors center at Warm Springs Dam, 
    California, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
    1962 (76 Stat. 1192), shall be known and designated as the ``Milt 
    Brandt Visitors Center''.
        (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the 
    visitors center referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be 
    a reference to the ``Milt Brandt Visitors Center''.
    (b) Carr Creek Lake, Kentucky.--
        (1) Designation.--Carr Fork Lake in Knott County, Kentucky, 
    authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 
    Stat. 1188), shall be known and designated as ``Carr Creek Lake''.
        (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the lake 
    referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to 
    ``Carr Creek Lake''.
    (c) John T. Myers Lock and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky.--
        (1) Designation.--Uniontown Lock and Dam, on the Ohio River, 
    Indiana and Kentucky, shall be known and designated as the ``John 
    T. Myers Lock and Dam''.
        (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the lock 
    and dam referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a 
    reference to the ``John T. Myers Lock and Dam''.
    (d) J. Edward Roush Lake, Indiana.--
        (1) Redesignation.--The lake on the Wabash River in Huntington 
    and Wells Counties, Indiana, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
    Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 312), and known as Huntington Lake, 
    shall be known and designated as the ``J. Edward Roush Lake''.
        (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the lake 
    referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to 
    the ``J. Edward Roush Lake''.
    (e) Russell B. Long Lock and Dam, Red River Waterway, Louisiana.--
        (1) Designation.--Lock and Dam 4 of the Red River Waterway, 
    Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ``Russell B. Long 
    Lock and Dam''.
        (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the lock 
    and dam referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a 
    reference to the ``Russell B. Long Lock and Dam''.
    (f) Locks and Dams on Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway.--
        (1) Designations.--The following locks, and locks and dams, on 
    the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, located in the States of Alabama, 
    Kentucky, Mississippi, and Tennessee, are designated as follows:
            (A) Gainesville Lock and Dam at Mile 266 designated as 
        Howell Heflin Lock and Dam.
            (B) Columbus Lock and Dam at Mile 335 designated as John C. 
        Stennis Lock and Dam.
            (C) The lock and dam at Mile 358 designated as Aberdeen 
        Lock and Dam.
            (D) Lock A at Mile 371 designated as Amory Lock.
            (E) Lock B at Mile 376 designated as Glover Wilkins Lock.
            (F) Lock C at Mile 391 designated as Fulton Lock.
            (G) Lock D at Mile 398 designated as John Rankin Lock.
            (H) Lock E at Mile 407 designated as G.V. ``Sonny'' 
        Montgomery Lock.
            (I) Bay Springs Lock and Dam at Mile 412 designated as 
        Jamie Whitten Lock and Dam.
        (2) Legal references.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to a lock, or 
    lock and dam, referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a 
    reference to the designation for the lock, or lock and dam, 
    provided in such paragraph.

SEC. 503. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests for carrying out watershed 
management, restoration, and development projects at the locations 
described in subsection (d).
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) 
may be in support of non-Federal projects for the following purposes:
        (1) Management and restoration of water quality.
        (2) Control and remediation of toxic sediments.
        (3) Restoration of degraded streams, rivers, wetlands, and 
    other waterbodies to their natural condition as a means to control 
    flooding, excessive erosion, and sedimentation.
        (4) Protection and restoration of watersheds, including urban 
    watersheds.
        (5) Demonstration of technologies for nonstructural measures to 
    reduce destructive impacts of flooding.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (d) Project Locations.--The Secretary may provide assistance under 
subsection (a) for projects at the following locations:
        (1) Gila River and Tributaries, Santa Cruz River, Arizona.
        (2) Rio Salado, Salt River, Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona.
        (3) Colusa basin, California.
        (4) Los Angeles River watershed, California.
        (5) Napa Valley watershed, California.
        (6) Russian River watershed, California.
        (7) Sacramento River watershed, California.
        (8) San Pablo Bay watershed, California.
        (9) Santa Clara Valley watershed, California.
        (10) Nancy Creek, Utoy Creek, and North Peachtree Creek and 
    South Peachtree Creek basin, Georgia.
        (11) Lower Platte River watershed, Nebraska.
        (12) Juniata River watershed, Pennsylvania, including Raystown 
    Lake.
        (13) Upper Potomac River watershed, Grant and Mineral Counties, 
    West Virginia.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.

SEC. 504. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

    Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4836-4837) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Authorization of Appropriations for Construction 
Assistance.--There are authorized to be appropriated for providing 
construction assistance under this section--
        ``(1) $10,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(5);
        ``(2) $2,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(6);
        ``(3) $10,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(7);
        ``(4) $11,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(8);
        ``(5) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(16); and
        ``(6) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(17).''.

SEC. 505. CORPS CAPABILITY TO CONSERVE FISH AND WILDLIFE.

    Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2263(b); 100 Stat. 4157) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``$5,000,000''; and inserting ``$7,000,000''; 
    and
        (2) in paragraph (4) by inserting ``and Virginia'' after 
    ``Maryland''.

SEC. 506. PERIODIC BEACH NOURISHMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out periodic beach 
nourishment for each of the following projects for a period of 50 years 
beginning on the date of initiation of construction of the project:
        (1) Broward county, florida.--Project for shoreline protection, 
    segments II and III, Broward County, Florida.
        (2) Fort pierce, florida.--Project for shoreline protection, 
    Fort Pierce, Florida.
        (3) Panama city beaches, florida.--Project for shoreline 
    protection, Panama City Beaches, Florida.
        (4) Tybee island, georgia.--Project for beach erosion control, 
    Tybee Island, Georgia.
    (b) Periodic Beach Nourishment Subject to Review.--
        (1) Review.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete a review of 
    potential periodic beach nourishment for each of the projects 
    described in paragraph (3) in accordance with the procedures 
    established under section 156 of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5f; 90 Stat. 2933).
        (2) Authorization.--If the Secretary determines under paragraph 
    (1) that periodic beach nourishment is necessary for a project, the 
    Secretary shall carry out periodic beach nourishment for the 
    project for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of 
    initiation of construction of the project.
        (3) Projects.--The projects referred to in paragraph (1) are as 
    follows:
            (A) Lee county, florida.--Project for shoreline protection, 
        Lee County, Captiva Island segment, Florida.
            (B) Palm beach county, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Jupiter/Carlin, Ocean Ridge, and Boca Raton North 
        Beach segments, Palm Beach County, Florida.
            (C) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, new jersey.--Project 
        for hurricane-flood protection, Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, 
        New Jersey.
            (D) Fire island inlet, new york.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Fire Island Inlet, New York, between Gilgo State 
        Park and Tobay Beach to protect Ocean Parkway along the 
        Atlantic Ocean shoreline in Suffolk County, New York.

SEC. 507. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE.

    The Secretary shall provide design and construction assistance to 
non-Federal interests for each of the following projects if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible:
        (1) Repair and rehabilitation of the Lower Girard Lake Dam, 
    Girard, Ohio, at an estimated total cost of $2,500,000.
        (2) Construction of a multipurpose dam and reservoir, Bear 
    Valley Dam, Franklin County, Pennsylvania, at an estimated total 
    cost of $15,000,000.
        (3) Repair and upgrade of the dam and appurtenant features at 
    Lake Merriweather, Little Calfpasture River, Virginia, at an 
    estimated total cost of $6,000,000.

SEC. 508. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148-4149) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (10);
        (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (11) and 
    inserting a semicolon; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(12) Goodyear Lake, Otsego County, New York, removal of silt 
    and aquatic growth;
        ``(13) Otsego Lake, Otsego County, New York, removal of silt 
    and aquatic growth and measures to address high nutrient 
    concentration;
        ``(14) Oneida Lake, Oneida County, New York, removal of silt 
    and aquatic growth;
        ``(15) Skaneateles and Owasco Lakes, New York, removal of silt 
    and aquatic growth and prevention of sediment deposit; and
        ``(16) Twin Lakes, Paris, Illinois, removal of silt and excess 
    aquatic vegetation, including measures to address excessive 
    sedimentation, high nutrient concentration, and shoreline 
    erosion.''.

SEC. 509. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    (a) In General.--Upon request of the non-Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the following 
navigation channels constructed or improved by non-Federal interests if 
the Secretary determines that such maintenance is economically 
justified and environmentally acceptable and that the channel was 
constructed in accordance with applicable permits and appropriate 
engineering and design standards:
        (1) Humboldt Harbor and Bay, Fields Landing Channel, 
    California.
        (2) Mare Island Strait, California. For purposes of this 
    section, the navigation channel shall be deemed to have been 
    constructed or improved by non-Federal interests.
        (3) East Fork, Calcasieu Pass, Louisiana.
        (4) Mississippi River Ship Channel, Chalmette Slip, Louisiana.
        (5) Greenville Inner Harbor Channel, Mississippi.
        (6) New Madrid Harbor, Missouri. For purposes of this section, 
    the navigation channel shall be deemed to have been constructed or 
    improved by non-Federal interests.
        (7) Providence Harbor Shipping Channel, Rhode Island, from the 
    vicinity of the Fox Point hurricane barrier to the vicinity of the 
    Francis Street bridge in Providence, Rhode Island. For purposes of 
    this section, the navigation channel shall be deemed to have been 
    constructed or improved by non-Federal interests.
        (8) Matagorda Ship Channel, Point Comfort Turning Basin, Texas.
        (9) Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Rincon Canal System, Texas.
        (10) Brazos Island Harbor, Texas, connecting channel to Mexico.
        (11) Blair Waterway, Tacoma Harbor, Washington.
    (b) Completion of Assessment.--Not later than 6 months after 
receipt of a request from a non-Federal interest for Federal assumption 
of maintenance of a channel listed in subsection (a), the Secretary 
shall make a determination as provided in subsection (a) and advise the 
non-Federal interest of the Secretary's determination.

SEC. 510. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot program 
    to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in the 
    Chesapeake Bay watershed.
        (2) Form.--The assistance shall be in the form of design and 
    construction assistance for water-related environmental 
    infrastructure and resource protection and development projects 
    affecting the Chesapeake Bay estuary, including projects for 
    sediment and erosion control, protection of eroding shorelines, 
    protection of essential public works, wastewater treatment and 
    related facilities, water supply and related facilities, and 
    beneficial uses of dredged material, and other related projects 
    that may enhance the living resources of the estuary.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned, and will be publicly operated and maintained.
    (c) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for--
            (A) the development by the Secretary, in consultation with 
        appropriate Federal, State, and local officials, of a 
        facilities or resource protection and development plan, 
        including appropriate engineering plans and specifications and 
        an estimate of expected resource benefits; and
            (B) the establishment of such legal and institutional 
        structures as are necessary to ensure the effective long-term 
        operation and maintenance of the project by the non-Federal 
        interest.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) Federal share.--Except as provided in paragraph (2)(B), the 
    Federal share of the total project costs of each local cooperation 
    agreement entered into under this section shall be 75 percent.
        (2) Non-federal share.--
            (A) Value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
        relocations.--In determining the non-Federal contribution 
        toward carrying out a local cooperation agreement entered into 
        under this section, the Secretary shall provide credit to a 
        non-Federal interest for the value of lands, easements, rights-
        of-way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal interest, 
        except that the amount of credit provided for a project under 
        this paragraph may not exceed 25 percent of the total project 
        costs.
            (B) Operation and maintenance costs.--The non-Federal share 
        of the costs of operation and maintenance of activities carried 
        out under an agreement under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Cooperation.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall 
cooperate with the heads of appropriate Federal agencies, including--
        (1) the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency;
        (2) the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Administrator 
    of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;
        (3) the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director 
    of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service; and
        (4) the heads of such other Federal agencies and agencies of a 
    State or political subdivision of a State as the Secretary 
    determines to be appropriate.
    (f) Project.--The Secretary shall establish at least 1 project 
under this section in each of the States of Maryland, Virginia, and 
Pennsylvania.
    (g) Protection of Resources.--A project established under this 
section shall be carried out using such measures as are necessary to 
protect environmental, historic, and cultural resources.
    (h) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with a recommendation concerning whether 
or not the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 511. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO IMPROVE SALMON SURVIVAL.

    (a) Salmon Survival Activities.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall accelerate ongoing 
    research and development activities, and may carry out or 
    participate in additional research and development activities, for 
    the purpose of developing innovative methods and technologies for 
    improving the survival of salmon, especially salmon in the Columbia 
    River Basin.
        (2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated research and 
    development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include 
    research and development related to--
            (A) impacts from water resources projects and other impacts 
        on salmon life cycles;
            (B) juvenile and adult salmon passage;
            (C) light and sound guidance systems;
            (D) surface-oriented collector systems;
            (E) transportation mechanisms; and
            (F) dissolved gas monitoring and abatement.
        (3) Additional activities.--Additional research and development 
    activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include research and 
    development related to--
            (A) marine mammal predation on salmon;
            (B) studies of juvenile salmon survival in spawning and 
        rearing areas;
            (C) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and adult salmon 
        survival;
            (D) impacts on salmon life cycles from sources other than 
        water resources projects; and
            (E) other innovative technologies and actions intended to 
        improve fish survival, including the survival of resident fish.
        (4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate any 
    activities carried out under this subsection with appropriate 
    Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, and the 
    Northwest Power Planning Council.
        (5) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of the 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
    report on the research and development activities carried out under 
    this subsection, including any recommendations of the Secretary 
    concerning the research and development activities.
        (6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out research and development 
    activities under paragraph (3).
    (b) Advanced Turbine Development.--
        (1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of Energy, 
    the Secretary shall accelerate efforts toward developing 
    innovative, efficient, and environmentally safe hydropower 
    turbines, including design of ``fish-friendly'' turbines, for use 
    on the Columbia River hydrosystem.
        (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated $12,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
    (c) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the authority 
of the Secretary to implement the results of the research and 
development carried out under this section or any other law.

SEC. 512. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS.

    Section 401(a) of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish procedures 
for review of tribal constitutions and bylaws or amendments thereto 
pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 987)'', approved 
November 1, 1988 (102 Stat. 2944), is amended--
        (1) by striking ``(a) All Federal'' and all that follows 
    through ``Columbia River Gorge Commission'' and inserting the 
    following:
    ``(a) Existing Federal Lands.--
        ``(1) In general.--All Federal lands that are included within 
    the 20 recommended treaty fishing access sites set forth in the 
    publication of the Corps of Engineers entitled `Columbia River 
    Treaty Fishing Access Sites Post Authorization Change Report', 
    dated April 1995,''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Boundary adjustments.--The Secretary of the Army, in 
    consultation with affected tribes, may make such minor boundary 
    adjustments to the lands referred to in paragraph (1) as the 
    Secretary determines are necessary to carry out this title.''.

SEC. 513. GREAT LAKES CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITIES.

    (a) Assessment.--Pursuant to the responsibilities of the Secretary 
under section 123 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (33 U.S.C. 
1293a), the Secretary shall conduct an assessment of the general 
conditions of confined disposal facilities in the Great Lakes.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the assessment conducted under subsection (a), including the 
following:
        (1) A description of the cumulative effects of confined 
    disposal facilities in the Great Lakes.
        (2) Recommendations for specific remediation actions for each 
    confined disposal facility in the Great Lakes.
        (3) An evaluation of, and recommendations for, confined 
    disposal facility management practices and technologies to conserve 
    capacity at such facilities and to minimize adverse environmental 
    effects at such facilities throughout the Great Lakes system.

SEC. 514. GREAT LAKES DREDGED MATERIAL TESTING AND EVALUATION MANUAL.

    The Secretary, in cooperation with the Administrator of the 
Environmental Protection Agency, shall provide technical assistance to 
non-Federal interests on testing procedures contained in the Great 
Lakes Dredged Material Testing and Evaluation Manual developed pursuant 
to section 230.2(c) of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations.

SEC. 515. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

    Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 401. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

    ``(a) Great Lakes Remedial Action Plans.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary may provide technical, 
    planning, and engineering assistance to State and local governments 
    and nongovernmental entities designated by a State or local 
    government in the development and implementation of remedial action 
    plans for Areas of Concern in the Great Lakes identified under the 
    Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978.
        ``(2) Non-federal share.--Non-Federal interests shall 
    contribute, in cash or by providing in-kind contributions, 50 
    percent of costs of activities for which assistance is provided 
    under paragraph (1).
    ``(b) Sediment Remediation Projects.--
        ``(1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
    Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (acting 
    through the Great Lakes National Program Office), may conduct 
    pilot- and full-scale projects of promising technologies to 
    remediate contaminated sediments in freshwater coastal regions in 
    the Great Lakes basin. The Secretary shall conduct not fewer than 3 
    full-scale projects under this subsection.
        ``(2) Site selection for projects.--In selecting the sites for 
    the technology projects, the Secretary shall give priority 
    consideration to Saginaw Bay, Michigan, Sheboygan Harbor, 
    Wisconsin, Grand Calumet River, Indiana, Ashtabula River, Ohio, 
    Buffalo River, New York, and Duluth-Superior Harbor, Minnesota and 
    Wisconsin.
        ``(3) Deadline for identifications.--The Secretary shall--
            ``(A) not later than 18 months after the date of the 
        enactment of this paragraph, identify the sites and 
        technologies for projects under this subsection; and
            ``(B) not later than 3 years after that date, complete each 
        such full-scale project.
        ``(4) Non-federal share.--Non-Federal interests shall 
    contribute 50 percent of costs of projects under this subsection. 
    Such costs may be paid in cash or by providing in-kind 
    contributions.
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $5,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 1998 through 2000.''.

SEC. 516. SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may enter into cooperation 
agreements with non-Federal interests with respect to navigation 
projects, or other appropriate non-Federal entities, for the 
development of long-term management strategies for controlling 
sediments at such projects.
    (b) Contents of Strategies.--Each strategy developed under 
subsection (a) shall--
        (1) include assessments of sediment rates and composition, 
    sediment reduction options, dredging practices, long-term 
    management of any dredged material disposal facilities, remediation 
    of such facilities, and alternative disposal and reuse options;
        (2) include a timetable for implementation of the strategy; and
        (3) incorporate relevant ongoing planning efforts, including 
    remedial action planning, dredged material management planning, 
    harbor and waterfront development planning, and watershed 
    management planning.
    (c) Consultation.--In developing strategies under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall consult with interested Federal agencies, States, 
and Indian tribes and provide an opportunity for public comment.
    (d) Dredged Material Disposal.--
        (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
    the feasibility of constructing and operating an underwater 
    confined dredged material disposal site in the Port of New York-New 
    Jersey that could accommodate as much as 250,000 cubic yards of 
    dredged material for the purpose of demonstrating the feasibility 
    of an underwater confined disposal pit as an environmentally 
    suitable method of containing certain sediments.
        (2) Report.--The Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report 
    on the results of the study conducted under paragraph (1), together 
    with any recommendations of the Secretary that may be developed in 
    a strategy under subsection (a).
    (e) Great Lakes Tributary Model.--
        (1) In general.--In consultation and coordination with the 
    Great Lakes States, the Secretary shall develop a tributary 
    sediment transport model for each major river system or set of 
    major river systems depositing sediment into a Great Lakes 
    federally authorized commercial harbor, channel maintenance project 
    site, or Area of Concern identified under the Great Lakes Water 
    Quality Agreement of 1978. Such model may be developed as a part of 
    a strategy developed under subsection (a).
        (2) Requirements for models.--In developing a tributary 
    sediment transport model under this subsection, the Secretary shall 
    build on data and monitoring information generated in earlier 
    studies and programs of the Great Lakes and their tributaries.
    (f) Great Lakes States Defined.--In this section, the term ``Great 
Lakes States'' means the States of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, 
Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $5,000,000 for 
each of fiscal years 1998 through 2001.

SEC. 517. EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION.

    The jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Commission, established 
by the 1st section of the Act of June 28, 1879 (33 U.S.C. 641; 21 Stat. 
37), is extended to include--
        (1) all of the area between the eastern side of the Bayou 
    Lafourche Ridge from Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the Gulf of 
    Mexico and the west guide levee of the Mississippi River from 
    Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico;
        (2) Alexander County, Illinois; and
        (3) the area in the State of Illinois from the confluence of 
    the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers northward to the vicinity of 
    Mississippi River mile 39.5, including the Len Small Drainage and 
    Levee District, insofar as such area is affected by the flood 
    waters of the Mississippi River.

SEC. 518. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY TOLLS.

    It is the sense of Congress that the President should engage in 
negotiations with the Government of Canada for the purposes of--
        (1) eliminating tolls along the St. Lawrence Seaway system; and
        (2) identifying ways to maximize the movement of goods and 
    commerce through the St. Lawrence Seaway.

SEC. 519. RECREATION PARTNERSHIP INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall promote Federal, non-Federal, 
and private sector cooperation in creating public recreation 
opportunities and developing the necessary supporting infrastructure at 
water resources projects of the Corps of Engineers.
    (b) Infrastructure Improvements.--
        (1) Recreation infrastructure improvements.--In determining the 
    feasibility of the public-private cooperative under subsection (a), 
    the Secretary shall provide such infrastructure improvements as are 
    necessary to support a potential private recreational development 
    at the Raystown Lake Project, Pennsylvania, generally in accordance 
    with the Master Plan Update (1994) for the project.
        (2) Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement 
    with an appropriate non-Federal public entity to ensure that the 
    infrastructure improvements constructed by the Secretary on non-
    project lands pursuant to paragraph (1) are transferred to and 
    operated and maintained by the non-Federal public entity.
        (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to carry out this subsection $3,000,000.
    (c) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the cooperative efforts 
carried out under this section, including the improvements required by 
subsection (b).

SEC. 520. FIELD OFFICE HEADQUARTERS FACILITIES.

    Subject to amounts being made available in advance in 
appropriations Acts, the Secretary may use Plant Replacement and 
Improvement Program funds to design and construct a new headquarters 
facility for--
        (1) the New England Division, Waltham, Massachusetts; and
        (2) the Jacksonville District, Jacksonville, Florida.

SEC. 521. EARTHQUAKE PREPAREDNESS CENTER OF EXPERTISE EXPANSION.

    Using existing resources, the Secretary shall expand the Earthquake 
Preparedness Center of Expertise to address issues in the central 
United States by providing the necessary capability at an existing 
district office of the Corps of Engineers near the New Madrid fault.

SEC. 522. JACKSON COUNTY, ALABAMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, remediation of point and nonpoint sources of 
pollution and contaminated riverbed sediments, and related activities 
in Jackson County, Alabama, including the city of Stevenson.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal cost of assistance provided under 
this section may not exceed $3,000,000. The non-Federal share of 
assistance provided under this section shall be 25 percent.

SEC. 523. BENTON AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES, ARKANSAS.

    Section 220 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4836-4837) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Use of Federal Funds.--The Secretary may make available to 
the non-Federal interests funds not to exceed an amount equal to the 
Federal share of the total project cost to be used by the non-Federal 
interests to undertake the work directly or by contract.''.

SEC. 524. HEBER SPRINGS, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement with 
the city of Heber Springs, Arkansas, to provide 3,522 acre-feet of 
water supply storage in Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas, for municipal and 
industrial purposes, at no cost to the city.
    (b) Necessary Facilities.--The city of Heber Springs shall be 
responsible for 100 percent of the costs of construction, operation, 
and maintenance of any intake, transmission, treatment, or distribution 
facility necessary for utilization of the water supply.
    (c) Additional Water Supply Storage.--Any additional water supply 
storage required after the date of the enactment of this Act shall be 
contracted for and reimbursed by the city of Heber Springs, Arkansas.

SEC. 525. MORGAN POINT, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall accept as in-kind contributions for the project 
for creation of fish and wildlife habitat at Morgan Point, Arkansas--
        (1) the items described as fish and wildlife facilities and 
    land in the Morgan Point Bendway Closure Structure modification 
    report for the project, dated February 1994; and
        (2) fish stocking activities carried out by the non-Federal 
    interests for the project;
if the Secretary determines that the items and activities are 
compatible with the project.

SEC. 526. CALAVERAS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical 
assistance to non-Federal interests, in cooperation with Federal and 
State agencies, for reclamation and water quality protection projects 
for the purpose of abating and mitigating surface water quality 
degradation caused by abandoned mines in the watershed of the lower 
Mokelume River in Calaveras County, California.
    (b) Consultation With Federal Entities.--Any project under 
subsection (a) that is located on lands owned by the United States 
shall be undertaken in consultation with the Federal entity with 
administrative jurisdiction over such lands.
    (c) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the activities 
conducted under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent; except that, with 
respect to projects located on lands owned by the United States, the 
Federal share shall be 100 percent.
    (d) Effect on Authority of Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing in 
this section is intended to affect the authority of the Secretary of 
the Interior under title IV of the Surface Mining Control and 
Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1231 et seq.).
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000.

SEC. 527. FAULKNER ISLAND, CONNECTICUT.

    In consultation with the Director of the United States Fish and 
Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall design and construct shoreline 
protection measures for the coastline adjacent to the Faulkner Island 
Lighthouse, Connecticut, at a total cost of $4,500,000.

SEC. 528. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Central and southern florida project.--The term ``Central 
    and Southern Florida Project'' means the project for Central and 
    Southern Florida authorized under the heading ``central and 
    southern florida'' in section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 
    (62 Stat. 1176), and any modification to the project authorized by 
    law.
        (2) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the Governor's 
    Commission for a Sustainable South Florida, established by 
    Executive Order of the Governor dated March 3, 1994.
        (3) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the Governor of the 
    State of Florida.
        (4) South florida ecosystem.--The term ``South Florida 
    ecosystem'' means the area consisting of the lands and waters 
    within the boundary of the South Florida Water Management District, 
    including the Everglades, the Florida Keys, and the contiguous 
    near-shore coastal waters of South Florida.
        (5) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the South 
    Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force established by subsection 
    (f).
    (b) Restoration Activities.--
        (1) Comprehensive plan.--
            (A) Development.--
                (i) Purpose.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
            expeditiously as practicable, a proposed comprehensive plan 
            for the purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting 
            the South Florida ecosystem. The comprehensive plan shall 
            provide for the protection of water quality in, and the 
            reduction of the loss of fresh water from, the Everglades. 
            The comprehensive plan shall include such features as are 
            necessary to provide for the water-related needs of the 
            region, including flood control, the enhancement of water 
            supplies, and other objectives served by the Central and 
            Southern Florida Project.
                (ii) Considerations.--The comprehensive plan shall--

                    (I) be developed by the Secretary in cooperation 
                with the non-Federal project sponsor and in 
                consultation with the Task Force; and
                    (II) consider the conceptual framework specified in 
                the report entitled ``Conceptual Plan for the Central 
                and Southern Florida Project Restudy'', published by 
                the Commission and approved by the Governor.

            (B) Submission.--Not later than July 1, 1999, the Secretary 
        shall--
                (i) complete the feasibility phase of the Central and 
            Southern Florida Project comprehensive review study as 
            authorized by section 309(l) of the Water Resources 
            Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4844), and by 2 
            resolutions of the Committee on Public Works and 
            Transportation of the House of Representatives, dated 
            September 24, 1992; and
                (ii) submit to Congress the plan developed under 
            subparagraph (A)(i) consisting of a feasibility report and 
            a programmatic environmental impact statement covering the 
            proposed Federal action set forth in the plan.
            (C) Additional studies and analyses.--Notwithstanding the 
        completion of the feasibility report under subparagraph (B), 
        the Secretary shall continue to conduct such studies and 
        analyses as are necessary, consistent with subparagraph (A)(i).
        (2) Use of existing authority for unconstructed project 
    features.--The Secretary shall design and construct any features of 
    the Central and Southern Florida Project that are authorized on the 
    date of the enactment of this Act or that may be implemented in 
    accordance with the Secretary's authority to modify an authorized 
    project, including features authorized under sections 315 and 316, 
    with funds that are otherwise available, if the Secretary 
    determines that the design and construction--
            (A) will accelerate the restoration, preservation, and 
        protection of the South Florida ecosystem;
            (B) will be generally consistent with the conceptual 
        framework described in paragraph (1)(A)(ii)(II); and
            (C) will be compatible with the overall authorized purposes 
        of the Central and Southern Florida Project.
        (3) Critical restoration projects.--
            (A) In general.--In addition to the activities described in 
        paragraphs (1) and (2), if the Secretary, in cooperation with 
        the non-Federal project sponsor and the Task Force, determines 
        that a restoration project for the South Florida ecosystem will 
        produce independent, immediate, and substantial restoration, 
        preservation, and protection benefits, and will be generally 
        consistent with the conceptual framework described in paragraph 
        (1)(A)(ii)(II), the Secretary shall proceed expeditiously with 
        the implementation of the restoration project.
            (B) Initiation of projects.--After September 30, 1999, no 
        new projects may be initiated under subparagraph (A).
            (C) Authorization of appropriations.--
                (i) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
            to the Department of the Army to pay the Federal share of 
            the cost of carrying out projects under subparagraph (A) 
            $75,000,000 for the period consisting of fiscal years 1997 
            through 1999.
                (ii) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
            carrying out any 1 project under subparagraph (A) shall be 
            not more than $25,000,000.
        (4) General provisions.--
            (A) Water quality.--In carrying out activities described in 
        this subsection and sections 315 and 316, the Secretary--
                (i) shall take into account the protection of water 
            quality by considering applicable State water quality 
            standards; and
                (ii) may include in projects such features as are 
            necessary to provide water to restore, preserve, and 
            protect the South Florida ecosystem.
            (B) Compliance with applicable law.--In carrying out the 
        activities described in this subsection and subsection (c), the 
        Secretary shall comply with any applicable Federal law, 
        including the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
        U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
        U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
            (C) Public participation.--In developing the comprehensive 
        plan under paragraph (1) and carrying out the activities 
        described in this subsection and subsection (c), the Secretary 
        shall provide for public review and comment on the activities 
        in accordance with applicable Federal law.
    (c) Integration of Other Activities.--
        (1) In general.--In carrying out activities described in 
    subsection (b), the Secretary shall integrate such activities with 
    ongoing Federal and State projects and activities, including--
            (A) the project for the ecosystem restoration of the 
        Kissimmee River, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802);
            (B) the project for modifications to improve water 
        deliveries into Everglades National Park authorized by section 
        104 of the Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion 
        Act of 1989 (16 U.S.C. 410r-8);
            (C) activities under the Florida Keys National Marine 
        Sanctuary and Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 1433 note; 104 Stat. 
        3089); and
            (D) the Everglades Construction Project of the State of 
        Florida.
        (2) Statutory construction.--
            (A) Existing authority.--Except as otherwise expressly 
        provided in this section, nothing in this section affects any 
        authority in effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, 
        or any requirement of the authority, relating to participation 
        in restoration activities in the South Florida ecosystem, 
        including the projects and activities specified in paragraph 
        (1), by--
                (i) the Department of the Interior;
                (ii) the Department of Commerce;
                (iii) the Department of the Army;
                (iv) the Environmental Protection Agency;
                (v) the Department of Agriculture;
                (vi) the State of Florida; and
                (vii) the South Florida Water Management District.
            (B) New authority.--Nothing in this section confers any new 
        regulatory authority on any Federal or non-Federal entity that 
        carries out any activity authorized by this section.
    (d) Justification.--
        (1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood 
    Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision of 
    law, in carrying out the activities to restore, preserve, and 
    protect the South Florida ecosystem described in subsection (b), 
    the Secretary may determine that the activities--
            (A) are justified by the environmental benefits derived by 
        the South Florida ecosystem in general and the Everglades and 
        Florida Bay in particular; and
            (B) shall not need further economic justification if the 
        Secretary determines that the activities are cost-effective.
        (2) Applicability.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any 
    separable element intended to produce benefits that are 
    predominantly unrelated to the restoration, preservation, and 
    protection of the South Florida ecosystem.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) In general.--Except as provided in sections 315 and 316 and 
    paragraph (2), the non-Federal share of the cost of activities 
    described in subsection (b) shall be 50 percent.
        (2) Water quality features.--
            (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph (B), 
        the non-Federal share of the cost of project features to 
        improve water quality described in subsection (b) shall be 100 
        percent.
            (B) Exception.--
                (i) In general.--Subject to clause (ii), if the 
            Secretary determines that a project feature to improve 
            water quality is essential to Everglades restoration, the 
            non-Federal share of the cost of the feature shall be 50 
            percent.
                (ii) Applicability.--Clause (i) shall not apply to any 
            feature of the Everglades Construction Project of the State 
            of Florida.
        (3) Operation and maintenance.--The operation and maintenance 
    of projects carried out under this section shall be a non-Federal 
    responsibility.
        (4) Credit.--Regardless of the date of acquisition, the value 
    of lands or interests in land acquired by non-Federal interests for 
    any activity described in subsection (b) shall be included in the 
    total cost of the activity and credited against the non-Federal 
    share of the cost of the activity. Such value shall be determined 
    by the Secretary.
    (f) South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force.--
        (1) Establishment and membership.--There is established the 
    South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, which shall consist 
    of the following members (or, in the case of a Federal agency, a 
    designee at the level of assistant secretary or an equivalent 
    level):
            (A) The Secretary of the Interior, who shall serve as 
        chairperson.
            (B) The Secretary of Commerce.
            (C) The Secretary.
            (D) The Attorney General.
            (E) The Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
        Agency.
            (F) The Secretary of Agriculture.
            (G) The Secretary of Transportation.
            (H) 1 representative of the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of 
        Florida, to be appointed by the Secretary of the Interior based 
        on the recommendations of the tribal chairman.
            (I) 1 representative of the Seminole Tribe of Florida, to 
        be appointed by the Secretary of the Interior based on the 
        recommendations of the tribal chairman.
            (J) 2 representatives of the State of Florida, to be 
        appointed by the Secretary of the Interior based on the 
        recommendations of the Governor.
            (K) 1 representative of the South Florida Water Management 
        District, to be appointed by the Secretary of the Interior 
        based on the recommendations of the Governor.
            (L) 2 representatives of local government in the State of 
        Florida, to be appointed by the Secretary of the Interior based 
        on the recommendations of the Governor.
        (2) Duties of task force.--The Task Force--
            (A) shall consult with, and provide recommendations to, the 
        Secretary during development of the comprehensive plan under 
        subsection (b)(1);
            (B) shall coordinate the development of consistent 
        policies, strategies, plans, programs, projects, activities, 
        and priorities for addressing the restoration, preservation, 
        and protection of the South Florida ecosystem;
            (C) shall exchange information regarding programs, 
        projects, and activities of the agencies and entities 
        represented on the Task Force to promote ecosystem restoration 
        and maintenance;
            (D) shall establish a Florida-based working group which 
        shall include representatives of the agencies and entities 
        represented on the Task Force as well as other governmental 
        entities as appropriate for the purpose of formulating, 
        recommending, coordinating, and implementing the policies, 
        strategies, plans, programs, projects, activities, and 
        priorities of the Task Force;
            (E) may, and the working group described in subparagraph 
        (D), may--
                (i) establish such advisory bodies as are necessary to 
            assist the Task Force in its duties, including public 
            policy and scientific issues; and
                (ii) select as an advisory body any entity, such as the 
            Commission, that represents a broad variety of private and 
            public interests;
            (F) shall facilitate the resolution of interagency and 
        intergovernmental conflicts associated with the restoration of 
        the South Florida ecosystem among agencies and entities 
        represented on the Task Force;
            (G) shall coordinate scientific and other research 
        associated with the restoration of the South Florida ecosystem;
            (H) shall provide assistance and support to agencies and 
        entities represented on the Task Force in their restoration 
        activities;
            (I) shall prepare an integrated financial plan and 
        recommendations for coordinated budget requests for the funds 
        proposed to be expended by agencies and entities represented on 
        the Task Force for the restoration, preservation, and 
        protection of the South Florida ecosystem; and
            (J) shall submit a biennial report to Congress that 
        summarizes--
                (i) the activities of the Task Force;
                (ii) the policies, strategies, plans, programs, 
            projects, activities, and priorities planned, developed, or 
            implemented for the restoration of the South Florida 
            ecosystem; and
                (iii) progress made toward the restoration.
        (3) Procedures and advice.--
            (A) Public participation.--
                (i) In general.--The Task Force shall implement 
            procedures to facilitate public participation in the 
            advisory process, including providing advance notice of 
            meetings, providing adequate opportunity for public input 
            and comment, maintaining appropriate records, and making a 
            record of the proceedings of meetings available for public 
            inspection.
                (ii) Oversight.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
            ensure that the procedures described in clause (i) are 
            adopted and implemented and that the records described in 
            clause (i) are accurately maintained and available for 
            public inspection.
            (B) Advisors to the task force and working group.--The Task 
        Force or the working group described in paragraph (2)(D) may 
        seek advice and input from any interested, knowledgeable, or 
        affected party as the Task Force or working group, 
        respectively, determines necessary to perform the duties 
        described in paragraph (2).
            (C) Application of the federal advisory committee act.--
                (i) Task force and working group.--The Task Force and 
            the working group shall not be considered advisory 
            committees under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
            U.S.C. App.).
                (ii) Advisors.--Seeking advice and input under 
            subparagraph (B) shall not be subject to the Federal 
            Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
        (4) Compensation.--A member of the Task Force shall receive no 
    compensation for the service of the member on the Task Force.
        (5) Travel expenses.--Travel expenses incurred by a member of 
    the Task Force in the performance of services for the Task Force 
    shall be paid by the agency, tribe, or government that the member 
    represents.

SEC. 529. TAMPA, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary may enter into a cooperative agreement under section 
229 with the Museum of Science and Industry, Tampa, Florida, to provide 
technical, planning, and design assistance to demonstrate the water 
quality functions found in wetlands, at an estimated total Federal cost 
of $500,000.

SEC. 530. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR DEEP RIVER BASIN, INDIANA.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Natural 
Resources Conservation Service of the Department of Agriculture, shall 
develop a watershed management plan for the Deep River Basin, Indiana, 
including Deep River, Lake George, Turkey Creek, and other related 
tributaries in Indiana.
    (b) Contents.--The plan to be developed by the Secretary under 
subsection (a) shall address specific concerns related to the Deep 
River Basin area, including--
        (1) sediment flow into Deep River, Turkey Creek, and other 
    tributaries;
        (2) control of sediment quality in Lake George;
        (3) flooding problems;
        (4) the safety of the Lake George Dam; and
        (5) watershed management.

SEC. 531. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests 
in southern and eastern Kentucky.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in southern and eastern Kentucky, including projects for 
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and related 
facilities, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Project Cooperation Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with such assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each agreement entered into under this 
    subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        development plan or resource protection plan, including 
        appropriate plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--Total project costs under each agreement 
        entered into under this subsection shall be shared at 75 
        percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. The Federal share 
        may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of project 
        costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by such interest before entering into the agreement 
        with the Secretary.
            (C) Credit for certain financing costs.--In the event of a 
        delay in the reimbursement of the non-Federal share of a 
        project, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
        reasonable interest and other associated financing costs 
        necessary for such non-Federal interest to provide the non-
        Federal share of the project's cost.
            (D) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way.--The non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for lands, easements, rights-of-
        way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal interest 
        toward its share of project costs (including costs associated 
        with obtaining permits necessary for the placement of such 
        project on publicly owned or controlled lands), but not to 
        exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed under 
        an agreement entered into under this subsection shall be 100 
        percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed as waiving, limiting, or otherwise affecting 
the applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (f) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1999, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with recommendations concerning whether or 
not such program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (g) Southern and Eastern Kentucky Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``southern and eastern Kentucky'' means Morgan, Floyd, Pulaski, 
Wayne, Laurel, Knox, Pike, Menifee, Perry, Harlan, Breathitt, Martin, 
Jackson, Wolfe, Clay, Magoffin, Owsley, Johnson, Leslie, Lawrence, 
Knott, Bell, McCreary, Rockcastle, Whitley, Lee, and Letcher Counties, 
Kentucky.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 532. COASTAL WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECTS, LOUISIANA.

    Section 303(f) of the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and 
Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 3952(f); 104 Stat. 4782-4783) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (4) by striking ``and (3)'' and inserting 
    ``(3), and (5)''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(5) Federal share in calendar years 1996 and 1997.--
    Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2), upon approval of the 
    conservation plan under section 304 and a determination by the 
    Secretary that a reduction in the non-Federal share is warranted, 
    amounts made available in accordance with section 306 to carry out 
    coastal wetlands restoration projects under this section in 
    calendar years 1996 and 1997 shall provide 90 percent of the cost 
    of such projects.''.

SEC. 533. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA.

    (a) Flood Control.--The Secretary shall proceed with engineering, 
design, and construction of projects to provide for flood control and 
improvements to rainfall drainage systems in Jefferson, Orleans, and 
St. Tammany Parishes, Louisiana, in accordance with the following 
reports of the New Orleans District Engineer: Jefferson and Orleans 
Parishes, Louisiana, Urban Flood Control and Water Quality Management, 
July 1992; Tangipahoa, Techefuncte, and Tickfaw Rivers, Louisiana, June 
1991; St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, July 1996; and Schneider Canal, 
Slidell, Louisiana, Hurricane Protection, May 1990.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The cost of any work performed by the non-
Federal interests subsequent to the dates of the reports referred to in 
subsection (a) and determined by the Secretary to be a compatible and 
integral part of the projects shall be credited toward the non-Federal 
share of the projects.
    (c) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000 
for the initiation and partial accomplishment of projects described in 
the reports referred to in subsection (a).
    (d) Additional Obligations.--No funds may be obligated in excess of 
the amount authorized by subsection (c) for the projects for flood 
control and improvements to rainfall drainage systems authorized by 
subsection (a) until the Corps of Engineers determines that the 
additional work to be carried out with such funds is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economic, as applicable.

SEC. 534. ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA.

    (a) Project To Mitigate Shore Damage.--The Secretary shall expedite 
the Assateague Island restoration feature of the Ocean City, Maryland, 
and vicinity study and, if the Secretary determines that the Federal 
navigation project has contributed to degradation of the shoreline, the 
Secretary shall carry out the shoreline restoration feature. The 
Secretary shall allocate costs for the project feature pursuant to 
section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i; 82 
Stat. 735).
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out the project under this section, 
the Secretary shall coordinate with affected Federal and State agencies 
and shall enter into an agreement with the Federal property owner to 
determine the allocation of the project costs.
    (c) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section $35,000,000.

SEC. 535. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and design 
assistance to State, local, and other Federal entities for the 
restoration of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal, in the vicinity of 
Cumberland, Maryland.

SEC. 536. WILLIAM JENNINGS RANDOLPH ACCESS ROAD, GARRETT COUNTY, 
              MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall transfer up to $600,000 to the State of 
Maryland for use by the State in constructing an access road to the 
William Jennings Randolph Lake in Garrett County, Maryland.

SEC. 537. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for the beneficial use of 
dredged material at Poplar Island, Maryland, substantially in 
accordance with, and subject to the conditions described in, the report 
of the Secretary dated September 3, 1996, at a total cost of 
$307,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $230,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $77,000,000. The project shall be carried 
out under the policies and cooperative agreement requirements of 
section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 
2326), except that subsection (e) of such section shall not apply to 
the project authorized by this section.

SEC. 538. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, SMITH ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall implement erosion control 
measures in the vicinity of Rhodes Point, Smith Island, Maryland, at an 
estimated total Federal cost of $450,000.
    (b) Implementation on Emergency Basis.--The project under 
subsection (a) shall be carried out on an emergency basis in view of 
the national, historic, and cultural value of the island and in order 
to protect the Federal investment in infrastructure facilities.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing applicable to hurricane and storm 
damage reduction shall be applicable to the project to be carried out 
under subsection (a).

SEC. 539. RESTORATION PROJECTS FOR MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND WEST 
              VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--
        (1) Technical assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical 
    assistance to non-Federal interests, in cooperation with Federal 
    and State agencies, for reclamation and water quality protection 
    projects for the purpose of abating and mitigating surface water 
    quality degradation caused by abandoned mines along--
            (A) the North Branch of the Potomac River, Maryland, 
        Pennsylvania, and West Virginia; and
            (B) the New River, West Virginia, watershed.
        (2) Additional measures.--Projects under paragraph (1) may also 
    include measures for the abatement and mitigation of surface water 
    quality degradation caused by the lack of sanitary wastewater 
    treatment facilities or the need to enhance such facilities.
        (3) Consultation with federal entities.--Any project under 
    paragraph (1) that is located on lands owned by the United States 
    shall be undertaken in consultation with the Federal entity with 
    administrative jurisdiction over such lands.
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the activities 
conducted under subsection (a)(1) shall be 50 percent; except that, 
with respect to projects located on lands owned by the United States, 
the Federal share shall be 100 percent.
    (c) Effect on Authority of Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing in 
this section is intended to affect the authority of the Secretary of 
the Interior under title IV of the Surface Mining Control and 
Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1231 et seq.).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000 for projects 
undertaken under subsection (a)(1)(A) and $1,500,000 for projects 
undertaken under subsection (a)(1)(B).

SEC. 540. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANTS, MICHIGAN, PENNSYLVANIA, AND 
              VIRGINIA AND NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall carry out under section 104 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610)--
        (1) a program to control aquatic plants in Lake St. Clair, 
    Michigan;
        (2) a program to control aquatic plants in the Schuylkill 
    River, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and
        (3) a program to control aquatic plants in Lake Gaston, 
    Virginia and North Carolina.

SEC. 541. DULUTH, MINNESOTA, ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT.

    (a) Project Authorization.--The Secretary shall develop and 
implement alternative methods for decontamination and disposal of 
contaminated dredged material at the Port of Duluth, Minnesota.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000.

SEC. 542. LAKE SUPERIOR CENTER, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Construction.--The Secretary shall assist the Minnesota Lake 
Superior Center authority in the construction of an educational 
facility to be used in connection with efforts to educate the public in 
the economic, recreational, biological, aesthetic, and spiritual worth 
of Lake Superior and other large bodies of fresh water.
    (b) Public Ownership.--Prior to providing any assistance under 
subsection (a), the Secretary shall verify that the facility to be 
constructed under subsection (a) will be owned by the public authority 
established by the State of Minnesota to develop, operate, and maintain 
the Lake Superior Center.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for the construction of the facility under subsection (a) 
$10,000,000.

SEC. 543. REDWOOD RIVER BASIN, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Study and Strategy Development.--The Secretary, in cooperation 
with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of Minnesota, shall 
conduct a study, and develop a strategy, for using wetland restoration, 
soil and water conservation practices, and nonstructural measures to 
reduce flood damage, improve water quality, and create wildlife habitat 
in the Redwood River basin and the subbasins draining into the 
Minnesota River, at an estimated Federal cost of $4,000,000.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
study and development of the strategy shall be 25 percent and may be 
provided through in-kind services and materials.
    (c) Cooperation Agreements.--In conducting the study and developing 
the strategy under this section, the Secretary may enter into 
cooperation agreements to provide financial assistance to appropriate 
Federal, State, and local government agencies, including assistance for 
the implementation of wetland restoration projects and soil and water 
conservation measures.
    (d) Implementation.--The Secretary shall undertake development and 
implementation of the strategy authorized by this section in 
cooperation with local landowners and local government officials.

SEC. 544. COLDWATER RIVER WATERSHED, MISSISSIPPI.

    Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary shall initiate all remaining work associated with 
the Coldwater River Watershed Demonstration Erosion Control Project, as 
authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations to 
provide productive employment for hundreds of thousands of jobless 
Americans, to hasten or initiate Federal projects and construction of 
lasting value to the Nation and its citizens, and to provide 
humanitarian assistance to the indigent for fiscal year 1983, and for 
other purposes'', approved March 24, 1983 (97 Stat. 13).

SEC. 545. NATCHEZ BLUFFS, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall carry out the project for bluff stabilization, 
Natchez Bluffs, Natchez, Mississippi, substantially in accordance with 
the Natchez Bluffs Study, dated September 1985, the Natchez Bluffs 
Study: Supplement I, dated June 1990, and the Natchez Bluffs Study: 
Supplement II, dated December 1993, at a total cost of $17,200,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $12,900,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $4,300,000. The project shall be carried out in the 
portions of the bluffs described in the studies specified in the 
preceding sentence as Clifton Avenue, area 3; Bluff above Silver 
Street, area 6; Bluff above Natchez Under-the-Hill, area 7; and Madison 
Street to State Street, area 4.

SEC. 546. SARDIS LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Management.--The Secretary shall work cooperatively with the 
State of Mississippi and the city of Sardis, Mississippi, to the 
maximum extent practicable, in the management of existing and proposed 
leases of land consistent with the Sardis Lake Recreation and Tourism 
Master Plan prepared by the city for the economic development of the 
Sardis Lake area.
    (b) Flood Control Storage.--The Secretary shall review the study 
conducted by the city of Sardis, Mississippi, regarding the impact of 
the Sardis Lake Recreation and Tourism Master Plan prepared by the city 
on flood control storage in Sardis Lake. The city shall not be required 
to reimburse the Secretary for the cost of such storage, or the cost of 
the Secretary's review, if the Secretary finds that the loss of flood 
control storage resulting from implementation of the master plan is not 
significant.

SEC. 547. ST. CHARLES COUNTY, MISSOURI, FLOOD PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
(including any regulation), no county located at the confluence of the 
Missouri and Mississippi Rivers or community located in any county 
located at the confluence of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers shall 
have its participation in the national flood insurance program 
established under chapter 1 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 
(42 U.S.C. 4011 et seq.) suspended, revoked, or otherwise affected 
solely due to that county's or community's permitting the raising of 
levees by any public-sponsored levee district, along an alignment 
approved by the circuit court of such county, to a level sufficient to 
contain a 20-year flood.
    (b) Permits.--The permit issued under section 404 of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) numbered P-1972, 
authorizing the reshaping and realignment of an existing levee, shall 
be considered adequate to allow the raising of levees under subsection 
(a).

SEC. 548. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall not reassign the St. Louis District of the 
Corps of Engineers from the operational control of the Lower 
Mississippi Valley Division.

SEC. 549. LIBBY DAM, MONTANA.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with section 103(c)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)(1)), the Secretary 
shall--
        (1) complete the construction and installation of generating 
    units 6 through 8 at Libby Dam, Montana; and
        (2) remove the partially constructed haul bridge over the 
    Kootenai River, Montana.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $16,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 550. HACKENSACK MEADOWLANDS AREA, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 324(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4849) is amended to read as follows:
        ``(1) Mitigation, enhancement, and acquisition of significant 
    wetlands that contribute to the Meadowlands ecosystem.''.

SEC. 551. HUDSON RIVER HABITAT RESTORATION, NEW YORK.

    (a) Habitat Restoration.--The Secretary shall expedite the 
feasibility study of the Hudson River Habitat Restoration, Hudson River 
Basin, New York, and may carry out not fewer than 4 projects for 
habitat restoration in the Hudson River Basin, to the extent the 
Secretary determines such work to be advisable and technically 
feasible. Such projects shall be designed to--
        (1) assess and improve habitat value and environmental outputs 
    of recommended projects;
        (2) evaluate various restoration techniques for effectiveness 
    and cost;
        (3) fill an important local habitat need within a specific 
    portion of the study area; and
        (4) take advantage of ongoing or planned actions by other 
    agencies, local municipalities, or environmental groups that would 
    increase the effectiveness or decrease the overall cost of 
    implementing one of the recommended restoration project sites.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--Non-Federal interests shall provide 25 
percent of the cost of each project undertaken under subsection (a). 
The non-Federal share may be in the form of cash or in-kind 
contributions.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $11,000,000.

SEC. 552. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

    (a) Environmental Assistance Program.--
        (1) Establishment.--The Secretary shall establish a program for 
    providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in the 
    New York City Watershed.
        (2) Form of assistance.--Assistance provided under this section 
    may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-
    related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
    development projects in the New York City Watershed, including 
    projects for water supply, storage, treatment, and distribution 
    facilities, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (c) Eligible Projects.--
        (1) Certification.--A project shall be eligible for financial 
    assistance under this section only if the State director for the 
    project certifies to the Secretary that the project will contribute 
    to the protection and enhancement of the quality or quantity of the 
    New York City water supply.
        (2) Special consideration.--In certifying projects to the 
    Secretary, the State director shall give special consideration to 
    those projects implementing plans, agreements, and measures that 
    preserve and enhance the economic and social character of the 
    communities in the New York City Watershed.
        (3) Project descriptions.--Projects eligible for assistance 
    under this section shall include the following:
            (A) Implementation of intergovernmental agreements for 
        coordinating regulatory and management responsibilities.
            (B) Acceleration of whole farm planning to implement best 
        management practices to maintain or enhance water quality and 
        to promote agricultural land use.
            (C) Acceleration of whole community planning to promote 
        intergovernmental cooperation in the regulation and management 
        of activities consistent with the goal of maintaining or 
        enhancing water quality.
            (D) Natural resources stewardship on public and private 
        lands to promote land uses that preserve and enhance the 
        economic and social character of the communities in the New 
        York City Watershed and protect and enhance water quality.
    (d) Cooperation Agreements.--Before providing assistance under this 
section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation agreement 
with the State director for the project to be carried out with such 
assistance.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) In general.--Total project costs under each agreement 
    entered into under this section shall be shared at 75 percent 
    Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. The Federal share may be in the 
    form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
        (2) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
    receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work completed by 
    such interest prior to entering into the agreement with the 
    Secretary for a project.
        (3) Credit for interest.--In the event of a delay in the 
    reimbursement of the non-Federal share of a project, the non-
    Federal interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest costs 
    incurred to provide the non-Federal share of a project's cost.
        (4) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
    Federal interest shall receive credit for lands, easements, rights-
    of-way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal interest toward 
    its share of project costs (including direct costs associated with 
    obtaining permits necessary for the placement of such project on 
    publicly owned or controlled lands), but not to exceed 25 percent 
    of total project costs.
        (5) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
    operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
    assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to waive, limit, or otherwise affect the 
applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project carried out with assistance provided under 
this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2000, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with recommendations concerning whether 
such program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) New York City Watershed Defined.--In this section, the term 
``New York City Watershed'' means the land area within the counties of 
Delaware, Greene, Schoharie, Ulster, Sullivan, Westchester, Putnam, and 
Duchess, New York, that contributes water to the water supply system of 
New York City.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $22,500,000.

SEC. 553. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may make capital improvements to the 
New York State Canal System.
    (b) Agreements.--The Secretary, with the consent of appropriate 
local and State entities, shall enter into such arrangements, 
contracts, and leases with public and private entities as may be 
necessary for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation, preservation, 
and maintenance of the New York State Canal System and its related 
facilities, including trailside facilities and other recreational 
projects along the waterways of the canal system.
    (c) New York State Canal System Defined.--In this section, the term 
``New York State Canal System'' means the Erie, Oswego, Champlain, and 
Cayuga-Seneca Canals.
    (d) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of capital 
improvements under this section shall be 50 percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $8,000,000.

SEC. 554. ORCHARD BEACH, BRONX, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for shoreline 
protection, Orchard Beach, Bronx, New York, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible, may carry out the project, at 
a maximum Federal cost of $5,200,000.

SEC. 555. DREDGED MATERIAL CONTAINMENT FACILITY FOR PORT OF NEW YORK-
              NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may construct, operate, and maintain 
a dredged material containment facility with a capacity commensurate 
with the long-term dredged material disposal needs of port facilities 
under the jurisdiction of the Port of New York-New Jersey. Such 
facility may be a near-shore dredged material disposal facility along 
the Brooklyn waterfront.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The costs associated with feasibility studies, 
design, engineering, and construction under this section shall be 
shared with the non-Federal interest in accordance with section 101 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).
    (c) Public Benefit.--After the facility constructed under 
subsection (a) has been filled to capacity with dredged material, the 
Secretary shall maintain the facility for the public benefit.

SEC. 556. QUEENS COUNTY, NEW YORK.

    (a) Description of Nonnavigable Area.--Subject to subsections (b) 
and (c), the area of Long Island City, Queens County, New York, that--
        (1) is not submerged;
        (2) as of the date of the enactment of this Act, lies between 
    the southerly high water line of Anable Basin (also known as the 
    ``11th Street Basin'') and the northerly high water line of Newtown 
    Creek; and
        (3) extends from the high water line (as of such date of 
    enactment) of the East River to the original high water line of the 
    East River;
is declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
    (b) Requirement That Area Be Improved.--
        (1) In general.--The declaration of nonnavigability under 
    subsection (a) shall apply only to those portions of the area 
    described in subsection (a) that are, or will be, bulkheaded, 
    filled, or otherwise occupied by permanent structures or other 
    permanent physical improvements (including parkland).
        (2) Applicability of federal law.--Improvements described in 
    paragraph (1) shall be subject to applicable Federal laws, 
    including--
            (A) sections 9 and 10 of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
        appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation 
        of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
        purposes'', approved March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401 and 403);
            (B) section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
        (33 U.S.C. 1344); and
            (C) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
        U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (c) Expiration Date.--The declaration of nonnavigability under 
subsection (a) shall expire with respect to a portion of the area 
described in subsection (a), if the portion--
        (1) is not bulkheaded, filled, or otherwise occupied by a 
    permanent structure or other permanent physical improvement 
    (including parkland) in accordance with subsection (b) by the date 
    that is 20 years after the date of the enactment of this Act; or
        (2) requires an improvement described in subsection (b)(2) that 
    is subject to a permit under an applicable Federal law, and the 
    improvement is not commenced by the date that is 5 years after the 
    date of issuance of the permit.

SEC. 557. JAMESTOWN DAM AND PIPESTEM DAM, NORTH DAKOTA.

    (a) Revisions to Water Control Manuals.--In consultation with the 
States of North Dakota and South Dakota and the James River Water 
Development District, the Secretary shall review and consider revisions 
to the water control manuals for the Jamestown Dam and Pipestem Dam, 
North Dakota, to modify operation of the dams so as to reduce the 
magnitude and duration of flooding and inundation of land located 
within the 10-year floodplain along the James River in North Dakota and 
South Dakota.
    (b) Feasibility Study.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
            (A) complete a study to determine the feasibility of 
        providing flood protection for the land referred to in 
        subsection (a); and
            (B) submit a report on the study to Congress.
        (2) Considerations.--In carrying out paragraph (1), the 
    Secretary shall consider all reasonable project-related and other 
    options.

SEC. 558. NORTHEASTERN OHIO.

    The Secretary may provide technical assistance to local interests 
for establishment of a regional water authority in northeastern Ohio to 
address the water problems of the region. The Federal share of the 
costs of such planning shall not exceed 50 percent.

SEC. 559. OHIO RIVER GREENWAY.

    (a) Expedited Completion of Study.--The Secretary shall expedite 
the completion of the study for a project for the Ohio River Greenway, 
Jeffersonville, Clarksville, and New Albany, Indiana.
    (b) Construction.--Upon completion of the study, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary shall 
participate with the non-Federal interests in the construction of the 
project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Total project costs under this section shall be 
shared at 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal.
    (d) Lands, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--Non-Federal interests 
shall be responsible for providing all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the 
project.
    (e) Credit.--The non-Federal interests shall receive credit for 
those costs incurred by the non-Federal interests that the Secretary 
determines are compatible with the study, design, and implementation of 
the project.

SEC. 560. GRAND LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall carry out and complete a study of 
flooding in Grand/Neosho Basin and tributaries in the vicinity of 
Pensacola Dam in northeastern Oklahoma to determine the scope of the 
backwater effects of operation of the dam and to identify any lands 
that the Secretary determines have been adversely impacted by such 
operation or should have been originally purchased as flowage easement 
for the project.
    (b) Acquisition of Real Property.--Upon completion of the study and 
subject to advance appropriations, the Secretary may acquire from 
willing sellers such real property interests in any lands identified in 
the study as the Secretary determines are necessary to reduce the 
adverse impacts identified in the study conducted under subsection (a).
    (c) Implementation Reports.--The Secretary shall transmit to 
Congress reports on the operation of Pensacola Dam, including data on 
and a description of releases in anticipation of flooding (referred to 
as ``preoccupancy releases''), and the implementation of this section. 
The first of such reports shall be transmitted not later than 2 years 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--
        (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
    carry out this section $25,000,000.
        (2) Maximum funding for study.--Of amounts appropriated to 
    carry out this section, not to exceed $1,500,000 shall be available 
    for carrying out the study under subsection (a).

SEC. 561. BROAD TOP REGION OF PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 304 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4840) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--
        ``(1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of the 
    activities conducted under the cooperative agreement entered into 
    under subsection (a)--
            ``(A) shall be 75 percent; and
            ``(B) may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
        project costs.
        ``(2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of project 
    costs may be provided in the form of design and construction 
    services and other in-kind work provided by the non-Federal 
    interests, whether occurring subsequent to, or within 6 years prior 
    to, entering into an agreement with the Secretary. Non-Federal 
    interests shall receive credit for grants and the value of work 
    performed on behalf of such interests by State and local agencies, 
    as determined by the Secretary.''; and
        (2) in subsection (c) by striking ``$5,500,000'' and inserting 
    ``$11,000,000''.

SEC. 562. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall modify the allocation of costs for the water 
reallocation project at Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania, to the extent 
that the Secretary determines that such modification will provide 
environmental restoration benefits in meeting instream flow needs in 
the Susquehanna River basin.

SEC. 563. HOPPER DREDGE MCFARLAND.

    (a) Project Authorization.--
        (1) Determination.--The Secretary shall determine the 
    advisability and necessity of making modernization and efficiency 
    improvements to the hopper dredge McFarland. In making such 
    determination, the Secretary shall--
            (A) assess the need for returning the dredge to active 
        service;
            (B) determine whether the McFarland should be returned to 
        active service or the reserve fleet after the potential 
        improvements are completed and paid for; and
            (C) establish minimum standards of dredging service to be 
        met in areas served by the McFarland while the dredge is 
        undergoing improvements.
        (2) Authorization.--If the Secretary determines under paragraph 
    (1) that such modernization and efficiency improvements are 
    advisable and necessary, the Secretary may carry out the 
    modernization and efficiency improvements. The Secretary may carry 
    out such improvements only at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 
    Pennsylvania.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $20,000,000.

SEC. 564. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Water Works Restoration.--
        (1) In general.--Upon completion of a report by the Corps of 
    Engineers that such work is technically sound, environmentally 
    acceptable, and economic, as applicable, the Secretary shall 
    provide planning, design, and construction assistance for the 
    protection and restoration of the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Water 
    Works.
        (2) Coordination.--In providing assistance under this 
    subsection, the Secretary shall coordinate with the Fairmount Park 
    Commission and the Secretary of the Interior.
        (3) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
    out this subsection $1,000,000.
    (b) Cooperation Agreement for Schuylkill Navigation Canal.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall enter into a cooperation 
    agreement with the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to 
    participate in the rehabilitation of the Schuylkill Navigation 
    Canal at Manayunk.
        (2) Limitation on federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
    of the rehabilitation under paragraph (1) shall not exceed $300,000 
    for each fiscal year.
        (3) Area included.--For purposes of this subsection, the 
    Schuylkill Navigation Canal includes the section approximately 
    10,000 feet long extending between Lock and Fountain Streets, 
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    (c) Schuylkill River Park.--
        (1) Assistance.--Upon completion of a report by the Corps of 
    Engineers that such work is technically sound, environmentally 
    acceptable, and economic, as applicable, the Secretary may provide 
    technical, planning, design, and construction assistance for the 
    Schuylkill River Park, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
        (2) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
    out this subsection $2,700,000.
    (d) Pennypack Park.--
        (1) Assistance.--Upon completion of a report by the Corps of 
    Engineers that such work is technically sound, environmentally 
    acceptable, and economic, as applicable, the Secretary may provide 
    technical, design, construction, and financial assistance for 
    measures for the improvement and restoration of aquatic habitats 
    and aquatic resources at Pennypack Park, Philadelphia, 
    Pennsylvania.
        (2) Cooperation agreements.--In providing assistance under this 
    subsection, the Secretary shall enter into cooperation agreements 
    with the city of Philadelphia, acting through the Fairmount Park 
    Commission.
        (3) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
    out this subsection $15,000,000.
    (e) Frankford Dam.--
        (1) Cooperation agreements.--The Secretary may enter into 
    cooperation agreements with the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 
    acting through the Fairmount Park Commission, to provide assistance 
    for the elimination of the Frankford Dam, the replacement of the 
    Rhawn Street Dam, and modifications to the Roosevelt Dam and the 
    Verree Road Dam.
        (2) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
    out this subsection $900,000.

SEC. 565. SEVEN POINTS VISITORS CENTER, RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall construct a visitors center 
and related public use facilities at the Seven Points Recreation Area 
at Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania, generally in accordance with the Master 
Plan Update (1994) for the Raystown Lake Project.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,500,000.

SEC. 566. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests 
in southeastern Pennsylvania.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in southeastern Pennsylvania, including projects for waste 
water treatment and related facilities, water supply and related 
facilities, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with such assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--Total project costs under each local 
        cooperation agreement entered into under this subsection shall 
        be shared at 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. The 
        Federal share may be in the form of grants or reimbursements of 
        project costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by such interest prior to entering into a local 
        cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. The 
        credit for such design work shall not exceed 6 percent of the 
        total construction costs of the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In the event of a delay in the 
        funding of the non-Federal share of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share of a project's cost.
            (D) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for lands, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward its share of project 
        costs (including all reasonable costs associated with obtaining 
        permits necessary for the construction, operation, and 
        maintenance of such project on publicly owned or controlled 
        lands), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed as waiving, limiting, or otherwise affecting 
the applicability of any provision of Federal or State law that would 
otherwise apply to a project to be carried out with assistance provided 
under this section.
    (f) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program 
carried out under this section, together with recommendations 
concerning whether or not such program should be implemented on a 
national basis.
    (g) Southeastern Pennsylvania Defined.--In this section, the term 
``southeastern Pennsylvania'' means Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, 
Delaware, and Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000.

SEC. 567. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.

    (a) Study and Strategy Development.--The Secretary, in cooperation 
with the Secretary of Agriculture, the State of Pennsylvania, and the 
State of New York, shall conduct a study, and develop a strategy, for 
using wetland restoration, soil and water conservation practices, and 
nonstructural measures to reduce flood damage, improve water quality, 
and create wildlife habitat in the following portions of the Upper 
Susquehanna River basin:
        (1) The Juniata River watershed, Pennsylvania, at an estimated 
    Federal cost of $8,000,000.
        (2) The Susquehanna River watershed upstream of the Chemung 
    River, New York, at an estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
study and development of the strategy shall be 25 percent and may be 
provided through in-kind services and materials.
    (c) Cooperation Agreements.--In conducting the study and developing 
the strategy under this section, the Secretary may enter into 
cooperation agreements to provide financial assistance to appropriate 
Federal, State, and local government agencies, including assistance for 
the implementation of wetland restoration projects and soil and water 
conservation measures.
    (d) Implementation.--The Secretary shall undertake development and 
implementation of the strategy authorized by this section in 
cooperation with local landowners and local government officials.

SEC. 568. WILLS CREEK, HYNDMAN, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may carry out a project for flood control, Wills 
Creek, Borough of Hyndman, Pennsylvania, at an estimated total cost of 
$5,000,000.

SEC. 569. BLACKSTONE RIVER VALLEY, RHODE ISLAND AND MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with Federal, 
State, and local interests, shall provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance in the development and restoration of the Blackstone 
River Valley National Heritage Corridor, Rhode Island and 
Massachusetts.
    (b) Federal Share.--Funds made available under this section for 
planning and design of a project may not exceed 75 percent of the total 
cost of such planning and design.

SEC. 570. DREDGED MATERIAL CONTAINMENT FACILITY FOR PORT OF PROVIDENCE, 
              RHODE ISLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may construct, operate, and maintain 
a dredged material containment facility with a capacity commensurate 
with the long-term dredged material disposal needs of port facilities 
under the jurisdiction of the Port of Providence, Rhode Island.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The costs associated with feasibility studies, 
design, engineering, and construction shall be shared with the non-
Federal interest in accordance with section 101 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211).
    (c) Public Benefit.--After the facility constructed under 
subsection (a) has been filled to capacity with dredged material, the 
Secretary shall maintain the facility for the public benefit.

SEC. 571. QUONSET POINT-DAVISVILLE, RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall replace the bulkhead between piers 1 and 2 at 
the Quonset Point-Davisville Industrial Park, Rhode Island, at a total 
cost of $1,350,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $1,012,500 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $337,500. In conjunction with this 
project, the Secretary shall install high mast lighting at pier 2 at a 
total cost of $300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $225,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $75,000.

SEC. 572. EAST RIDGE, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a limited reevaluation of the flood 
management study for the East Ridge and Hamilton County area, 
Tennessee, undertaken by the Tennessee Valley Authority and may carry 
out the project at an estimated total cost of up to $25,000,000.

SEC. 573. MURFREESBORO, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary may carry out a project for environmental 
enhancement, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, in accordance with the Report and 
Environmental Assessment, Black Fox, Murfree and Oaklands Spring 
Wetlands, Murfreesboro, Rutherford County, Tennessee, dated August 
1994.

SEC. 574. TENNESSEE RIVER, HAMILTON COUNTY, TENNESSEE.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for bank 
stabilization, Tennessee River, Hamilton County, Tennessee, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, may carry out the 
project, at a maximum Federal cost of $7,500,000.

SEC. 575. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--During any evaluation of economic benefits and 
costs for projects set forth in subsection (b) that occurs after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall not consider 
flood control works constructed by non-Federal interests within the 
drainage area of such projects prior to the date of such evaluation in 
the determination of conditions existing prior to construction of the 
project.
    (b) Specific Projects.--The projects to which subsection (a) apply 
are--
        (1) the project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou Basin, Texas, 
    authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 
    Stat. 1258);
        (2) the project for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and 
    tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 101(a) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610); and
        (3) the project for flood control, Cypress Creek, Texas, 
    authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water Resources Development 
    Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014).

SEC. 576. NEABSCO CREEK, VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood control, Neabsco 
Creek Watershed, Prince William County, Virginia, at an estimated total 
cost of $1,500,000.

SEC. 577. TANGIER ISLAND, VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall design and construct a 
breakwater at the North Channel on Tangier Island, Virginia, at a total 
cost of $1,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $900,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $300,000.
    (b) Cost-Benefit Ratio.--Congress finds that in view of the 
historic preservation benefits resulting from the project authorized by 
this section, the overall benefits of the project exceed the costs of 
the project.

SEC. 578. PIERCE COUNTY, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Provision of Technical Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide 
technical assistance to Pierce County, Washington, to address measures 
that are necessary to ensure that non-Federal levees are adequately 
maintained and satisfy eligibility criteria for rehabilitation 
assistance under section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood 
control, and for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
701n; 55 Stat. 650).
    (b) Purpose of Assistance.--The purpose of the assistance under 
this section shall be to provide a review of the requirements of the 
Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989 (25 U.S.C. 1773 et 
seq.; 103 Stat. 83) and standards for project maintenance and 
vegetation management used by the Secretary in order to determine 
eligibility for levee rehabilitation assistance and, if appropriate, to 
amend such standards as needed to make non-Federal levees eligible for 
assistance that may be necessary as a result of future flooding.

SEC. 579. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA, FLOOD PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may design and implement a flood 
damage reduction program for the Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia, 
in the vicinity of Durbin, Cass, Marlinton, Renick, Ronceverte, and 
Alderson as generally presented in the District Engineer's draft 
Greenbrier River Basin Study Evaluation Report, dated July 1994, to the 
extent provided under subsection (b) to afford such communities a level 
of protection against flooding sufficient to reduce future losses to 
such communities from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in 
November 1985, January 1996, and May 1996.
    (b) Flood Protection Measures.--The flood damage reduction program 
referred to in subsection (a) may include the following as the Chief of 
Engineers determines necessary and advisable in consultation with the 
communities referred to in subsection (a):
        (1) Local protection projects such as levees, floodwalls, 
    channelization, small tributary stream impoundments, and 
    nonstructural measures such as individual floodproofing.
        (2) Floodplain relocations and resettlement site developments, 
    floodplain evacuations, and a comprehensive river corridor and 
    watershed management plan generally in accordance with the District 
    Engineer's draft Greenbrier River Corridor Management Plan, Concept 
    Study, dated April 1996.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000.

SEC. 580. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a limited reevaluation of the watershed 
plan and the environmental impact statement prepared for the Lower Mud 
River, Milton, West Virginia, by the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service pursuant to the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act 
(16 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.) and may carry out the project.

SEC. 581. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may design and construct flood 
control measures in the Cheat and Tygart River Basins, West Virginia, 
and the Lower Allegheny, Lower Monongahela, West Branch Susquehanna, 
and Juniata River Basins, Pennsylvania, at a level of protection 
sufficient to prevent any future losses to these communities from 
flooding such as occurred in January 1996, but no less than a 100-year 
level of flood protection.
    (b) Priority Communities.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to the communities of--
        (1) Parsons and Rowlesburg, West Virginia, in the Cheat River 
    Basin;
        (2) Bellington and Phillipi, West Virginia, in the Tygart River 
    Basin;
        (3) Connellsville, Pennsylvania, in the Lower Monongahela River 
    Basin;
        (4) Benson, Hooversville, Clymer, and New Bethlehem, 
    Pennsylvania, in the Lower Allegheny River Basin;
        (5) Patton, Barnesboro, Coalport, and Spangler, Pennsylvania, 
    in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin; and
        (6) Bedford, Linds Crossings, and Logan Township in the Juniata 
    River Basin.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000.

SEC. 582. SITE DESIGNATION.

    Section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended--
        (1) by inserting after ``for a site'' the following: ``(other 
    than the site located off the coast of Newport Beach, California, 
    which is known as `LA-3')''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following: ``Beginning January 1, 
    2000, no permit for dumping pursuant to this Act or authorization 
    for dumping under section 103(e) shall be issued for the site 
    located off the coast of Newport Beach, California, which is known 
    as `LA-3', unless such site has received a final designation 
    pursuant to this subsection or an alternative site has been 
    selected pursuant to section 103(b).''.

SEC. 583. LONG ISLAND SOUND.

    Section 119(e) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1269(e)) is amended by striking ``1996'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``2001''.

SEC. 584. WATER MONITORING STATION.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide assistance to non-
Federal interests for reconstruction of the water monitoring station on 
the North Fork of the Flathead River, Montana.
    (b) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section $50,000.

SEC. 585. OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT FACILITY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary shall provide assistance to the 
Narragansett Bay Commission for the construction of a combined river 
overflow management facility in Rhode Island.
    (b) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
this section $30,000,000.

SEC. 586. PRIVATIZATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the provisions of title II of the 
Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.), Executive 
Order 12803, or any other law or authority, an entity that received 
Federal grant assistance for an infrastructure asset under the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act shall not be required to repay any portion 
of the grant upon the lease or concession of the asset only if--
        (1) ownership of the asset remains with the entity that 
    received the grant; and
        (2) the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency 
    determines that the lease or concession furthers the purposes of 
    such Act and approves the lease or concession.
    (b) Limitation.--The Administrator shall not approve a total of 
more than 5 leases and concessions under this section.

 TITLE VI--EXTENSION OF EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY UNDER HARBOR MAINTENANCE 
                               TRUST FUND

SEC. 601. EXTENSION OF EXPENDITURE AUTHORITY UNDER HARBOR MAINTENANCE 
              TRUST FUND.

    Paragraph (1) of section 9505(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to expenditures from Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund) is 
amended to read as follows:
        ``(1) to carry out section 210 of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (as in effect on the date of the enactment 
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996),''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```