WA2-9_T4_HEA WTP calcs_11.04.09.xls

Author: Abt Associates Inc. Created: 11/04/2009

Worksheet Description summary sheet table summarzing study information and WTP values Study table table providing additional study detail Annualizatoin calculations for the annualization of study values Population Data state-level population data CPI sheet CPI data for updating study WTP values Purpose: Summary tables and calcualations in support of willingness-to-pay (WTP) calculations under the habitat-based approach for the assessment non-use benefits.

File Info 1 of 80

### Study Study Year State

North Atlantic Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow 2004 Rhode Island Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 1995 New York AVERAGE 

### Mid Atlantic Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 1995 New York 

### South Atlantic Dillman, Beran, and Hook 1993 South Carolina 

### Gulf of Mexico ??? 

### California Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge 1991 California 

### Great Lakes De Zoysa 1995 Ohio Bishop et al. 2000 Wisconsin (Green Bay) Mullarky 1999 Wisconsin AVERAGE 

### Inland De Zoysa 1995 Ohio Mullarky 1999 Wisconsin Blomquist and Whitehead 1998 Western Kentucky Whitehead and Bloomquist 1990 Western Kentucky Poor 1999 Nebraska AVERAGE

summary sheet 2 of 80

### Study

North Atlantic Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) AVERAGE 

### Mid Atlantic Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 

### South Atlantic Dillman, Beran, and Hook 

### Gulf of Mexico ??? 

### California Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge 

### Great Lakes De Zoysa Bishop et al. Mullarky AVERAGE 

### Inland De Zoysa Mullarky Blomquist and Whitehead Whitehead and Bloomquist Poor AVERAGE 

### Wetland Type HH WTP per acre per year (2008$) saltmarsh $0.0190 saltmarsh $0.0672 $0.0431 saltmarsh $0.0672 coastal plain freshwater wetland type $0.0001 non-coastal freshwater wetlands $0.0046-$0.0110 freshwater wetlands $0.0299 freshwater wetlands $0.0009-$0.0016 unspecified wetland type (non-coastal freshwater) $0.0082 $0.0131 freshwater wetlands $0.0299 unspecified wetland type (non-coastal freshwater) $0.0110 permanently flooded freshwater marsh $0.0056 Clear Creek freshwater wetland area $0.0037 freshwater, rainwater basin wetlands $0.0007 $0.0102

summary sheet 3 of 80

### Study

North Atlantic Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) AVERAGE 

### Mid Atlantic Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 

### South Atlantic Dillman, Beran, and Hook 

### Gulf of Mexico ??? 

### California Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge 

### Great Lakes De Zoysa Bishop et al. Mullarky AVERAGE 

### Inland De Zoysa Mullarky Blomquist and Whitehead Whitehead and Bloomquist Poor AVERAGE

### Total HHs HHs Included 408,000Statewide - Rhode Island residents 73,423East End Long Island HHs

- 73,423East End Long Island HHs 1,258,044Statewide - South Carolina

residents 8,725,826 Statewide - CA residents 235,721Maumee residents 346,700Households within 10 county area around Green Bay 1,822,118Statewide -

Wisconsin residents

- 235,721Maumee residents 8,725,826 Wisconsin residents 1,379,782Statewide -

Kentucky residents 1,379,782Statewide -

Kentucky residents 602,363Statewide - Nebraska residents -

summary sheet 4 of 80

### Study

North Atlantic Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) AVERAGE 

### Mid Atlantic Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 

### South Atlantic Dillman, Beran, and Hook 

### Gulf of Mexico ??? 

### California Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge 

### Great Lakes De Zoysa Bishop et al. Mullarky AVERAGE 

### Inland De Zoysa Mullarky Blomquist and Whitehead Whitehead and Bloomquist Poor AVERAGE 

### Notes

Low end of range is for a loss of 58,000 acres, high end is for a gain for 40,000 acres Also provides separate estimates for San Joaquin Valley HHs and "rest of CA" HHs Range is WTP for different programs increasing wetlands acres by 5-20% Study also provides separate esitmtes for \temporarily and seasonally flooded boomland hardwood wetland areas.

summary sheet 5 of 80Authors Publication Year Study Year

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) 1998 1990 Blomquist and Whitehead (B) 1998 1990 Blomquist and Whitehead (C) 1998 1990 Blomquist and Whitehead (D) 1998 1990 Whitehead and Bloomquist 1990 1989 Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow 2004 1997 Poor 1999 1996
Study Table 6 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Location Western Kentucky Western Kentucky Western Kentucky Western Kentucky Western Kentucky

Rhode Island Nebraska
Study Table 7 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Coastal or Non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal

coastal non-coastal
Study Table 8 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor 316b Region Inland Inland Inland Inland Inland

North Atlantic Inland
Study Table 9 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Habitat Type permanently flooded freshwater marsh temporarily flooded bottomland hardwoods seasonally flooded bottomland hardwoods permanently flooded bottomland hardwood Clear Creek wetland area

saltmarsh freshwater, rainwater basin wetlands
Study Table 10 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Services Addressed all wetland services (included fish & habitat services) all wetland services (included fish & habitat services) all wetland services (included fish & habitat services) all wetland services (included fish & habitat services) all wetland services

all wetland services

Study Table 11 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Methods CV - consider trade-off between 500 acres of wetlands preservation and coal mining - average of all four wetland types is $8.77 in 2008$ CV - consider trade-off between 500 acres of wetlands preservation and coal mining CV - consider trade-off between 500 acres of wetlands preservation and coal mining CV - consider trade-off between 500 acres of wetlands preservation and coal mining CV-WTP for wetland preservation CV- assess public preferences for restoration vs. preservation CV
Study Table 12 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Original Wetland Area (Acres) 3,968 70,080 25,216 1,408 84,000

83 34,000
Study Table 13 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Acres preserved or Created 500

500 500 500 5000

83 41,000
Study Table 14 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Results $1.69 (total WTP per HH per year) $4.69 (total WTP per HH per year) $3.68 (total WTP per HH per year) $11.21 (total WTP per HH per year)
$0.48 (WTP per acre of preserved or restored saltmarsh) 27.18 (2006$) (Value reported in Moeltner 2009)
Study Table 15 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor $ Year payment type 1990$ annual payment 1990$ annual payment 1990$ annual payment 1990$ annual payment 1989$ annual payment 1997$ one-time payment (reported as annual payment in Moeltner 2009)
Study Table 16 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor HH WTP per acre per year (2008$) - (3% annualization if needed) HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) - (7% annualization if needed) $0.0056 - $0.0156 - $0.0074 - $0.0224 - $0.0037 -
$0.0190 $0.0444 $0.0007 -
Study Table 17 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Total HHs Total WTP per acre per year (2008$) 1,379,782 $7,699 1,379,782 $21,497 1,379,782 $10,155 1,379,782 $30,935 1,379,782 $5,135
408,000 $7,755 602,363 $427
Study Table 18 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Response Rate HH Income 70% $40,881 70% $40,881 70% $40,881 70% $40,881 31% $55,916

$71,992 46% $44,125
Study Table 19 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Target Population (area sampled; total WTP) Kentucky HHs and some HHs bordering Kentuckey, three parts: (1) HH on the western Kentucky coal field, (2) rest of Kentucky outside of the coal field, (3) four cities outside of but bordering western Kentucky Kentucky HHs and some HHs bordering Kentuckey, three parts: (1) HH on the western Kentucky coal field, (2) rest of Kentucky outside of the coal field, (3) four cities outside of but bordering western Kentucky Kentucky HHs and some HHs bordering Kentuckey, three parts: (1) HH on the western Kentucky coal field, (2) rest of Kentucky outside of the coal field, (3) four cities outside of but bordering western Kentucky Kentucky HHs and some HHs bordering Kentuckey, three parts: (1) HH on the western Kentucky coal field, (2) rest of Kentucky outside of the coal field, (3) four cities outside of but bordering western Kentucky Kentucky residents - mail survey Survey administered at DMV in South Kingstown; applied to all 408,000 RI households; resulting in estimate of $196,000/acre of salt marsh preserved or restored mean/median HH income of respondents not reported, use RI 2008 HH median income form census data (http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/medin csizeandstate.xls) random sample from Nebraska households, mail survey. Apply mean to all Nebraska Households
Study Table 20 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Additional Notes does not present aggreate WTP estimates does not present aggreate WTP estimates does not present aggreate WTP estimates does not present aggreate WTP estimates, apply 1990 census estimate of Kentucky HHs to get an aggregate estimates very few surveyed had visited the area annualized using a 3% discount rate after CPI conversion apply 1990 census estimates of total Nebraska HHs
Study Table 21 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Do we have this study? yes yes yes yes yes

yes yes (also included in Moeltner 2009)
Study Table 22 of 80Authors

Blomquist and Whitehead (A) Blomquist and Whitehead (B) Blomquist and Whitehead (C) Blomquist and Whitehead (D) Whitehead and Bloomquist Bauer, Cyr, and Swallow Poor Full Reference

Study Table 23 of 80Authors Publication Year Study Year

Mullarky 1999 1994 Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) 1991 1989 Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) 1991 1989 Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) 1991 1989 Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) 1991 1989 Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) 1991 1989 Study Table 24 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Location

Wisconsin California California California California California Study Table 25 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Coastal or Non-coastal

non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal Study Table 26 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) 316b Region

Inland San Joaquin Valley rest of California all of California San Joaquin Valley rest of California Study Table 27 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Habitat Type unspecified wetland type (freshwater non-coastal freshwater wetlands non-coastal freshwater wetlands non-coastal freshwater wetlands non-coastal freshwater wetlands non-coastal freshwater wetlands Study Table 28 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Services Addressed

total economic value (1) onsite recreation value (2) commercial use of the resource (3) option value (4) existence value (5) bequest value total economic value (1) onsite recreation value (2) commercial use of the resource (3) option value (4) existence value (5) bequest value total economic value (1) onsite recreation value (2) commercial use of the resource (3) option value (4) existence value (5) bequest value total economic value (1) onsite recreation value (2) commercial use of the resource (3) option value (4) existence value (5) bequest value total economic value (1) onsite recreation value (2) commercial use of the resource (3) option value (4) existence value (5) bequest value Study Table 29 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Methods CV - case study of highway expansion project in northwest Wisconsin - 110 acres of wetlands (47 acres of tributary system wetlands, 63 acres of isolated basins - some acres do not provide fish habitat). Two groups, scope group not told about mitigation services, base group told about mitigation services (expectation that scope group WTP would be higher) - seperate sample means based on certainty levels - higher certainty ("definitely yes" only - means lower WTP) CV-loss of 58,000 acres - total WTP $26,120/acre (one-time payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001) CV-loss of 58,000 acres - total WTP $26,120/acre (one-time payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001) CV-loss of 58,000 acres - total WTP $26,120/acre (one-time payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001) CV-gain of 40,000 acres - total WTP $62525/acre (one-time payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001) CV-gain of 40,000 acres - total WTP $62525/acre (one-time payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001) Study Table 30 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Original Wetland Area (Acres)

110 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 Study Table 31 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Acres preserved or Created

110

58,000 58,000 58,000 40,000 40,000 Study Table 32 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Results $20.77 per HH 174 152 154 286 251 Study Table 33 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) $ Year payment type 1994$ one-time payment 1989$ annual 1989$ annual 1989$ annual 1989$ annual 1989$ annual Study Table 34 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) HH WTP per acre per year (2008$) - (3% annualization if needed) HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) - (7% annualization if needed)
$0.0082 $0.0192 $0.0052 - $0.0046 - $0.0046 - $0.0124 - $0.0109 - Study Table 35 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Total HHs Total WTP per acre per year (2008$)
1,822,118 $14,966 785,324 $4,099 7,940,502 $36,209 8,725,826 $40,313 785,324 $9,770 7,940,502 $86,698 Study Table 36 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Response Rate HH Income
60% $46,952 51% $71,450

51% $71,450

Study Table 37 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Target Population (area sampled; total WTP) mail survey, random sample of Wisconsin residents HH in the San Joaquin Valley and the rest of CA 1573 contacted households, 803 completed interview. Ignore non-respondents rather than treat as zero-value

HH in the San Joaquin Valley and the rest of CA 1573 contacted households, 803 completed interview. Ignore non-respondents rather than treat as zero-value

Study Table 38 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Additional Notes annualized using a 3% discount rate after CPI conversion no aggregate WTP estimates presented - implied that should be applied to all Wisconsin HHs present multiple values, $20.77 preferred (used in Moeltner 2009): base - $13.68, $24.07, and $37.38 per respondent (3 uncertainty levels) scope - $20.77, $41.84, and $57.83 per HH apply 1990 census estimate of total Wisconsin HHs aggregate estimates presented for the entire state of California, present separate HH estimates for SJV and rest of CA

aggregate estimates presented for the entire state of California, present separate HH estimates for SJV and rest of CA

Study Table 39 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Do we have this study?
have 1999 conference report, requested 1997 dissertation through ILL yes (hard copy) yes (hard copy) yes (hard copy) yes (hard copy) yes (hard copy) Study Table 40 of 80Authors

Mullarky Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A2) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (A3) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B1) Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B2) Full Reference

Study Table 41 of 80Authors Publication Year Study Year

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) 1991 1989 Bishop et al. (A) 2000 1999 Bishop et al. (B) 2000 1999 Bishop et al. (C) 2000 1999
Roberts and Leitch 1997 1996 Dillman, Beran, and Hook 1993 1992 de Zoysa 1995 1994 Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) 1995 Supplementary Studies Study Table 42 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Location California Wisconsin (Green Bay) Wisconsin (Green Bay) Wisconsin (Green Bay) Minnesota/South Dakota South Carolina Ohio New York (peconic Estuary) Study Table 43 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Coastal or Non-coastal non-coastal non-coastal (Great Lakes) non-coastal (Great Lakes) non-coastal (Great Lakes)
non-coastal ? non-coastal coastal Study Table 44 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies 316b Region all of California Great Lakes Great Lakes Great Lakes
Inland South Atlantic? (freshwater wetland) Inland/Great Lakes Mid-Atlantic (previously applied to NA as well) Study Table 45 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Habitat Type non-coastal freshwater wetlands freshwater wetlands freshwater wetlands freshwater wetlands large managed,lacustrine wetland coastal plain freshwater wetland type freshwater wetlands - Maumee river basin and western Basin of Lake Erie saltmarsh Study Table 46 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Services Addressed total economic value (1) onsite recreation value (2) commercial use of the resource (3) option value (4) existence value (5) bequest value

non-use fish/wildlife habitat and aesthetics wetland preservation, all wetland services

Study Table 47 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Methods CV-gain of 40,000 acres - total WTP $62525/acre (one-time payment) (Woodward and Wui 2001) TEV study - mean WTP for wetland programs, focused on wetlands within 5 miles of Green Bay; 2,900 acres is a 5% increase TEV study - mean WTP for wetland programs, focused on wetlands within 5 miles of Green Bay; 5,800 acres is a 10% increase TEV study - mean WTP for wetland programs, focused on wetlands within 5 miles of Green Bay; 11,600 acres is a 20% increase CV - for fish/wildlife habitat, recreation, and aesthetics. Resports separate values for use and non-use; only non-use included here. Mud Lake managed for flood control. 2,500 increase from a purchase CV Study Table 48 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Original Wetland Area (Acres) 85,000 58,000 58,000 58,000 5,000 ? 10,000 12,000 Study Table 49 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Acres preserved or Created 40,000

2900 5800 11600 5,000 2,500 3,000 5,500 Study Table 50 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Results 254 13.48 per HH 24.61 per HH 30.12 per HH $0.0008 WTP median - $4.83 (mean currently report on right on annual basis) WTP mean - $16.74

Study Table 51 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies $ Year payment type 1989$ annual 1999$ annual for ten years 1999$ annual for ten years 1999$ annual for ten years 1995$ annual 1992$ one-time payment 2002$ (as reported in Phase II chapter) annual 2002$ (as reported in Phase II chapter) annual Study Table 52 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies HH WTP per acre per year (2008$) - (3% annualization if needed) HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) - (7% annualization if needed) $0.0110 - $0.0016 $0.0032 $0.0014 $0.0058 $0.0009 $0.0071 $0.0012 $0.0001 $0.0002 $0.0299 - $0.0672 - Study Table 53 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Total HHs Total WTP per acre per year (2008$) 8,725,826 $96,412 346,700 $547 346,700 $500 346,700 $306 16,179 $19 1,258,044 $112 235,721 $5,879 73,423 $4,107 Study Table 54 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Response Rate HH Income
72% $56,760 72% $56,760 72% $56,760 62% $41,457 ? 50% $59,444 Study Table 55 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Target Population (area sampled; total WTP) loss assigned to 346,700 households within a 10county area that has Green Bay anglersaggregate values computed using a 3% dr (within this area expected to be more frequent users of the bay) loss assigned to 346,700 households within a 10county area that has Green Bay anglersaggregate values computed using a 3% dr (within this area expected to be more frequent users of the bay) loss assigned to 346,700 households within a 10county area that has Green Bay anglersaggregate values computed using a 3% dr (within this area expected to be more frequent users of the bay) Surveys sent to random sample of 1,034 households within 30 miles of Mud Lake; 3 WTP questions (1) geared toward rec, WTP for rec access (2) bequest-WTP annually to ensure rec and fish/wildlife available in future, and (3) existence-WTP annually to ensure others can use it. Low knowledge of the lake, lots of substitutes Applied to applied to entire SC 1990census pop (1,258,783). Study area included 15 counties in northwestern Ohio in the Maumee River Basin Area. 235,721 HHs in the Study Area. in person survey, so no response rate reported Study Table 56 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Additional Notes

Fish/Wildlife Habitat, Recreation, and Aesthetics use value (total annual) - $34,000 for 5,000 acres option value (total annual) - $39,000 for 5,000 acres existence value (total annual) -$29,000 for 5,000 acres aggregated based on total housing units in area 16,179 annualized using a 3% discount rate after CPI conversion Woodward and Wui make adjustment based on 21% response rate, by assuming $0 value for non-response, no such adjustment made here. This is the all Maumee HHs value (rural and urban). Mail Survey. This is the all resident value, study also breaks out by users and non-users. East End, Long Island HHs. Study Table 57 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Do we have this study? yes (hard copy) yes yes yes
yes have results through Woodward and Wui metadata; hard copy in mail

Study Table 58 of 80Authors

Loomis, Hanemann, B. Kanninen, T. Wegge (B3) Bishop et al. (A) Bishop et al. (B) Bishop et al. (C)
Roberts and Leitch Dillman, Beran, and Hook de Zoysa Peconic Estuary Study (Mazzota 1995, etc) Supplementary Studies Full Reference

Roberts, Lisa A., J.A. Leitch. 1997. Economic Valuation of Some Wetland Outputs of Mud Lake. North Dakota State University Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Report #381. De Zoysa, A. D. N. 1995. A Benefit Evaluation of Programs to Enhance Groundwater Quality, Surface Water Quality and Wetland Habitat in Northwest Ohio. Dissertation, Ohio State University. Study Table 59 of 80Authors Publication Year Study Year

Pate and Loomis 1997 1989

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen 1991 1989

Study Table 60 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Location California

California

Study Table 61 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Coastal or Non-coastal non-coastal

non-coastal

Study Table 62 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen 316b Region California

California

Study Table 63 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Habitat Type non-coastal freshwater wetlands

non-coastal freshwater wetlands

Study Table 64 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Services Addressed habitat services
includes all wetlands goods and services including passive uses

Study Table 65 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Methods CV- three programs assessed (1) Wetland and Habitat (2) Wildlife Contamination Control, & (3) River and Salmon Improvement. Annual WTP.
CV - two wetland policies: (1) maintain current wetlands (2) improve above current levels

Study Table 66 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Original Wetland Area (Acres) 85,000

85,000

Study Table 67 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Acres preserved or Created 58,000

58,000

Study Table 68 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Results SJV = $215.55 (1990$) (calculated values [right] base on SJV pop) Rest of CA =$210.77 OR=$67.80 WA=$99.75 NV=$196.01(WTP per year per HH) $248.23 (2006$) paper presents results for CA households (per HH per year) (1989$) for single-bounded and double-bounded approaches for now adjust Moeltner 1999 reported value based on CPI

Study Table 69 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen $ Year payment type 1990$ annual

1989$ annual

Study Table 70 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen HH WTP per acre per year (2008$) - (3% annualization if needed) HH WTP per acre

per year (2008$) - (7% annualization if needed) $0.0061

$0.0046

Study Table 71 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Total HHs Total WTP per acre per year (2008$) 8,725,826

Study Table 72 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Response Rate HH Income 51% $87,805

51% $87,805

Study Table 73 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Target Population (area sampled; total WTP) Including this would be duplicative of Loomis et al. 1991 mail survey included residents of CA San Joaquin Valley, CA residents outside of the Valley and residents of Washington, Oregon, and Nevada (max of 1,134 miles away) Including this would be duplicative of Loomis et al. 1991 same survey as above, only "rest of CA" data used for this study

Study Table 74 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Additional Notes HH and aggregate WTP presented per program; current conditions and program effects not described. Need to base info other surveys paper presents results for CA households (per HH per year) (1989$) for single-bounded and double-bounded approaches single-bounded - $250 wetland maintenance-$257 wetland improvement-$267 double-bounded (2nd bid contingent upon 1st bid) wetland maintenance-$152 wetland improvement-$251 double-bounded approach preferred based on paper results & EVRI does not describe acreage here, just describes wetland maintenance and restoration programs

Study Table 75 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Do we have this study? yes

yes

Study Table 76 of 80Authors

Pate and Loomis

Hanemann, Loomis, and Kanninen Full Reference

Study Table 77 of 80discount rate 3% discount rate 7%

program 1 program 1 year year no. period no. df annual value per HH year year no. period no. df annual value per HH

1999 1 0 1 $13.48 1999 1 0 1 $13.48 2000 2 1 0.970873786 $13.48 2000 2 1 0.934579439 $13.48 2001 3 2 0.942595909 $13.48 2001 3 2 0.873438728 $13.48 2002 4 3 0.915141659 $13.48 2002 4 3 0.816297877 $13.48 2003 5 4 0.888487048 $13.48 2003 5 4 0.762895212 $13.48 2004 6 5 0.862608784 $13.48 2004 6 5 0.712986179 $13.48 2005 7 6 0.837484257 $13.48 2005 7 6 0.666342224 $13.48 2006 8 7 0.813091511 $13.48 2006 8 7 0.622749742 $13.48 2007 9 8 0.789409234 $13.48 2007 9 8 0.582009105 $13.48 2008 10 9 0.766416732 $13.48 2008 10 9 0.543933743 $13.48 PV (one-time payment) $118.44 PV (one-time payment) $101.31 annual value $3.55 annual value $7.09 program 2 program 2 year year no. period no. df annual value per HH year year no. period no. df annual value per HH

1999 1 0 1 $24.61 1999 1 0 1 $24.61 2000 2 1 0.970873786 $24.61 2000 2 1 0.934579439 $24.61 2001 3 2 0.942595909 $24.61 2001 3 2 0.873438728 $24.61 2002 4 3 0.915141659 $24.61 2002 4 3 0.816297877 $24.61 2003 5 4 0.888487048 $24.61 2003 5 4 0.762895212 $24.61 2004 6 5 0.862608784 $24.61 2004 6 5 0.712986179 $24.61 2005 7 6 0.837484257 $24.61 2005 7 6 0.666342224 $24.61 2006 8 7 0.813091511 $24.61 2006 8 7 0.622749742 $24.61 2007 9 8 0.789409234 $24.61 2007 9 8 0.582009105 $24.61 2008 10 9 0.766416732 $24.61 2008 10 9 0.543933743 $24.61 PV (one-time payment) $216.23 PV (one-time payment) $184.95 annual value $6.49 annual value $12.95 program 3 program 3 year year no. period no. df annual value per HH year year no. period no. df annual value per HH

1999 1 0 1 $30.12 1999 1 0 1 $30.12 2000 2 1 0.970873786 $30.12 2000 2 1 0.934579439 $30.12 2001 3 2 0.942595909 $30.12 2001 3 2 0.873438728 $30.12 2002 4 3 0.915141659 $30.12 2002 4 3 0.816297877 $30.12 2003 5 4 0.888487048 $30.12 2003 5 4 0.762895212 $30.12 2004 6 5 0.862608784 $30.12 2004 6 5 0.712986179 $30.12 2005 7 6 0.837484257 $30.12 2005 7 6 0.666342224 $30.12 2006 8 7 0.813091511 $30.12 2006 8 7 0.622749742 $30.12 2007 9 8 0.789409234 $30.12 2007 9 8 0.582009105 $30.12 2008 10 9 0.766416732 $30.12 2008 10 9 0.543933743 $30.12 PV (one-time payment) $264.64 PV (one-time payment) $226.36 annual value $7.94 annual value $15.85

Annualization 3/30/2011 of 80Number of Housholds Through State and County Quickfacts 1990 2000 Reference Wisconsin 1,822,118 2,084,544http://factfinder.census.gov Nebraska 602,363 666,184http://factfinder.census.gov Kentucky 1,379,782 1,590,647http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/21000.html South Carolina 1,258,044 Counties within the San Joaquin Valley 1990 2000 San Joaquin 158156 181629http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?_bm=n&_lang=en&qr_ name=DEC_1990_STF1_DP1&ds_name=DEC_1990_STF1_&geo_ id=05000US06077 Fresno Kern Kings Madera Merced Tulare total california 10381206 1502870

Population Data 79 of 80to 2008

1980 2.61 1981 2.37 1982 2.23 1983 2.16 1984 2.07 1985 2 1986 1.96 1987 1.9 1988 1.82 1989 1.74 1990 1.65 1991 1.58 1992 1.53 1993 1.49 1994 1.45 1995 1.41 1996 1.37 1997 1.34 1998 1.32 1999 1.29 2000 1.25 2001 1.22 2002 1.2 2003 1.17 2004 1.14 2005 1.1 0.798507 2006 1.07 2007 10.4 2008 1 2009 1

CPI sheet 80 of 80