alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of iPCS, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersignedcertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  Timothy M. Yager                                                                |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy  M. Yager, President and Chief Executive Officer                             |
| Date:  May 11, 2009                                                             |
|                                                                                 |
|                                                                                 |
| /s/  Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr.                                                   |   |
| Stebbins  B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date:  May 11, 2009                                                             |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cytogen Corporation (the
        "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Kevin
        J.
        Bratton, Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer of the
        Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
        that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 Dated:
                  March 16, 2007
              /s/
                    Kevin J. BrattonKevin
                  J. BrattonSenior
                  Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial
                  Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6868

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus NIGEL CLARKE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:02-cr-00060-5-H; 4:07-cv-00020-H) Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 10, 2007 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nigel Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Nigel Clarke seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Clarke has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We deny Clarke’s motion to return the case to district court and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
# OAR Box 

# 1828

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 125 ) ll-K - 

# (B ) -11 5 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:52 AM Sheet 125 of 325 P. 1P. 2

IFCA M MODIFICATION S SUMMAR

Y(Se e relate dlette r Jun e 22 , 1983 ) Lette r fro

m T . Hogan , EEA

t o R . Short , EPA:EAB . Jun e 15 , 1983 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N BE FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-i(-(B)-ll l
#### Maude PAULEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27961.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 18, 1956.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal Feb. 29, 1956.

Bourne & Porter, by H. B. Porter, Dumas, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a fine of $250.

In the absence of a bond or recognizance on appeal, or a showing that appellant is in jail, we are without jurisdiction of this misdemeanor appeal. Braun v. State, 158 Tex.Cr.R. 394, 257 S.W.2d 708; Alexander v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 682; Warren v. State,Tex.Cr.App., 269 S.W.2d 682.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

On Motion to Reinstate Appeal

PER CURIAM.

At a former date, this appeal was dismissed because of the absence of a bond or recognizance or a showing that appellant was in jail.

A proper appeal bond has been filed.''.

Thg appeal 1⁄8 reinstáted; and the case 1⁄8 *1 * £ '*' ; . ”

The record contains no statement of facts of bills of exception, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Bondy Tan, certify that:
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Innovative Systems Inc.; |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

2.            Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.             I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and I have:

a)             designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)             disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

5.             I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)             all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)            any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 20, 2007

 

 

/s/ Bondy Tan

Bondy Tan, President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

CW1076503.1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-30206

UNITED STATES,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

MICHAEL ALAN SIMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(95-CR-50016)

October 9, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Alan Simpson appeals the district court’s enhancement

of his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1. Specifically, Simpson

claims that the district court clearly erred in combining the

abuse-of-trust concept with the special-skill concept for purposes

of the two-level enhancement. Further, Simpson argues that neither
concept applies to his case. The government argues that the

district court properly applied the two concepts; no error occured

because § 3B1.1 was written in the disjunctive.

We find that no evidence supports a contention that Simpson’s

“skill” as a real estate agent signficantly facilitated his offense

of conviction. Although the government argued at sentencing that

Simpson had collected real estate commissions in several

transactions in which his companies participated in the sales of

the properties, the skills used by Simpson during the transactions

did not significantly facilitate his offense of conviction.

We also find that Simpson had no relationship of trust with

the victims of this case, HUD and the FHA. Thus, he could not have

abused a positions of trust. As to the sellers of property Simpson

came in contact with, the mere fact that he had a real estate

license did not put him in a position of trust as a buyer of

properties.

Accordingly, because Simpson neither held a position of trust

nor used a special skill with respect to the offense of conviction,

we find that the district court clearly erred in assessing the

adjustment pursuant to § 3B1.3. This finding renders Simpson’s

alternative argument that the combination of these concepts is

impermissible moot. Simpson’s sentence is VACATED and REMANDED to

the district court for resentencing.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 266 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 266

   To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 with 
 respect to the preemption of the Hawaii Prepaid Health Care Act, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 24 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

   Mr. Akaka introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 with 
 respect to the preemption of the Hawaii Prepaid Health Care Act, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PREEMPTION OF HAWAII PREPAID HEALTH CARE ACT.

    Section 514(b)(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 
1974 (29 U.S.C. 1144(b)(5)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(5)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), 
        subsection (a) shall not apply to the Hawaii Prepaid Health 
        Care Act (Haw. Rev. Stat. Chapter 393, as amended) or any 
        insurance law of the State.
            ``(B) Nothing in subparagraph (A) shall be construed to 
        exempt from subsection (a) any State tax law relating to 
        employee benefits plans.
            ``(C) If the Secretary of Labor notifies the Governor of 
        the State of Hawaii that as the result of an amendment to the 
        Hawaii Prepaid Health Care Act enacted after the date of the 
        enactment of this paragraph--
                    ``(i) the proportion of the population with health 
                care coverage under such Act is less than such 
                proportion on such date, or
                    ``(ii) the level of benefit coverage provided under 
                such Act is less than the actuarial equivalent of such 
                level of coverage on such date,
        subparagraph (A) shall not apply with respect to the 
        application of such amendment to such Act after the date of 
        such notification.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 10079]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02885]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--SIP24-012, Advancing Research in 
Immunization Services Network (ARISe Network).
    Date: May 14, 2024.
    Time: 10 a.m.-6 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Teleconference/Web Conference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Catherine Barrett, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, National Center for Chronic Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Mailstop S106-3, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341-3717. Telephone: (404) 718-7664; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#185b5a796a6a7d6c6c587b7c7b367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ce8d8cafbcbcabbaba8eadaaade0a9a1b8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-02885 Filed 2-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.6


  


Base Salaries for Executive Officers


 


As of January 1, 2017 the following are the base salaries (on an
annual basis) of the executive officers (as defined in Rule 3b-7 of the Exchange Act) of Access National Corporation:


 


	Michael W. Clarke	 	$	435,625	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Dean Hackemer	 	$	386,250	 
	President, Mortgage Division	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Mark D. Moore	 	$	287,500	 
	President, Bank	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Robert C. Shoemaker	 	$	334,750	 
	Executive Vice President	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Margaret M. Taylor	 	$	314,150	 
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1224 

To increase the rate of the required annual reductions of the retained 

portfolios of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2011 

Mr. HENSARLING (for himself, Mr. BACHUS, Mr. GARRETT, and Mr. PEARCE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To increase the rate of the required annual reductions of 

the retained portfolios of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘GSE Portfolio Risk 

5 Reduction Act of 2011’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PORTFOLIO LIMITATIONS. 

7 Subtitle B of title XIII of the Housing and Commu8 nity Development Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4611 et seq.) 

9 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1224 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 1369F. RESTRICTION ON MORTGAGE ASSETS OF EN2 TERPRISES. 

3 ‘‘(a) RESTRICTION.—No enterprise shall own, as of 

4 any applicable date in this subsection or thereafter, mort5 gage assets in excess of— 

6 ‘‘(1) upon the expiration of the 1-year period 

7 that begins upon the enactment of the GSE Port8 folio Risk Reduction Act of 2011 or thereafter, 

9 $700,000,000,000; 

10 ‘‘(2) upon the expiration of the 2-year period 

11 that begins upon the enactment of such Act or 

12 thereafter, $600,000,000,000; 

13 ‘‘(3) upon the expiration of the 3-year period 

14 that begins upon the enactment of such Act or 

15 thereafter, $475,000,000,000; 

16 ‘‘(4) upon the expiration of the 4-year period 

17 that begins upon the enactment of such Act or 

18 thereafter, $350,000,000,000; and 

19 ‘‘(5) upon the expiration of the 5-year period 

20 that begins upon the enactment of such Act or 

21 thereafter, $250,000,000,000. 

22 ‘‘(b) DEFINITION OF MORTGAGE ASSETS.—For pur23 poses of this section, the term ‘mortgage assets’ means, 

24 with respect to an enterprise, assets of such enterprise 

25 consisting of mortgages, mortgage loans, mortgage-related 

26 securities, participation certificates, mortgage-backed 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1224 IH

1 commercial paper, obligations of real estate mortgage in2 vestment conduits and similar assets, in each case to the 

3 extent such assets would appear on the balance sheet of 

4 such enterprise in accordance with generally accepted ac5 counting principles in effect in the United States as of 

6 September 7, 2008 (as set forth in the opinions and pro7 nouncements of the Accounting Principles Board and the 

8 American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and 

9 statements and pronouncements of the Financial Account10 ing Standards Board from time to time; and without giv11 ing any effect to any change that may be made after Sep12 tember 7, 2008, in respect of Statement of Financial Ac13 counting Standards No. 140 or any similar accounting 

14 standard).’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSKG8SOYB1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

COREY LYNN CUNNINGHAM,

Appellant,

v.

JAPRYNGE CUNNINGHAM,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00180

- CV

Appeal from

146th District Court

of Bell County, Texas

(TC # 280,382

- B )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal. We further order

that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 7 TH DAY OF OCTOBER , 2016

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |               |
|------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                               |               |
| Dated:  February 8, 2011 | /s/ Jack L. Howard |
|                               | Name:              | Jack L. Howard |
|                               | Title:             | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |