alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 15, 2009                                                   |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                   |   |   |   |
| /s/ Ronald Conquest                                                    |   |   |        |
|                                                                        |   |   |        |
| Ronald ConquestChief Executive OfficerInMedica Development Corporation |   |   |   |
|                                                                   |   |   |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                           |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 2, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                     |  | Willis H. Newton, Jr.                                
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                    |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Pablo FRANCO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29661.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 7, 1958.

*639Walker F. Means, Pecos, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is misdemeanor theft; the punishment, 40 days in jail.

The record has now been perfected, and our two prior opinions dismissing this appeal are withdrawn.

The information alleged that the appellant stole a radio of the value of $40. We have searched this record in vain and fail to find any evidence whatsoever as to the value of the radio in question. It is axiomatic that in theft cases there must be some proof of the value of the stolen property. Keenan v. State, 120 Tex.Cr.R. 616, 48 S.W.2d 264, and Givens v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R. 277, 158 S.W.2d 535.

In view of another trial, we express serious doubt as to the sufficiency of the evidence to show that the property was found in the exclusive possession of the appellant.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
----

----

|   | Sen Yu International Holdings, Inc.                                                                                                    |       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                   |  100% |   |
|   | Advanced Swine Genetics, Inc.                                                                                                          |       |
|   |                                                                                                                                   |  100% |   |
|   | Heilongjiang SenYu Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd.(“SenYu,” an operating company formed in China)                               |       |
|   |                                                                                                                                   |  60%  |   |
|   | Sino-Canadian Sen Yu Polar Swine Genetics Company Limited (“Sino-Canadian JV,” a joint venture formed in China.) |       |

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TAJHON BODERICK WILSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-2866

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Frank Quesada, Judge.

Tajhon Boderick Wilson, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegel, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00314-CR

Pedro S. CONTRERAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CR-2486W

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 18, 2008

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that the case “is one in which the defendant

has waived the right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides,

“[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has

not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Appellant’s appellate

counsel notified this court that appellant does not have a right to appeal in this case. Counsel further
04-08-00314-CR

-2-

indicated that appellant would not file an amended trial court certification showing that he has the

right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 177

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with appellant’s

counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
Docket No: FAA-2015-0242 Dir ID: 2014-NM-100-AD
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 316

To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws

of the United States to perform an abortion with knowledge that such

abortion is being performed solely because of the gender of the fetus,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution

and laws of the United States to perform an abortion

with knowledge that such abortion is being performed

solely because of the gender of the fetus, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights of Infants

5 Act’’.
2

•S 316 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEPRIVING PERSONS OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION

2 OF LAWS BEFORE BIRTH.

3 Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C.

4 1983) is amended—

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(a)’’ before ‘‘Every person’’;

6 and

7 (2) by adding at the end thereof the following

8 new subsection:

9 ‘‘(b) For purposes of subsection (a), and for purposes

10 of other provisions of law, it shall be a deprivation of a

11 ‘right’ secured by the laws of the United States for an

12 individual to perform an abortion with the knowledge that

13 the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion solely because

14 of the gender of the fetus. No pregnant woman who seeks

15 to obtain an abortion solely on the basis of the gender

16 of the fetus shall be liable in any manner under this sec17 tion.’’.

Æ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Genetic Variation and Evolution Study Section, February 15, 2024, 10:00 a.m. to February 16, 2024, 08:30 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 24, 2024, 89 FR 4610, Doc 2024-01290.                

                    The GVE meeting is being amended to change the SRO from Guoqin Yu, Ph.D., to Linda Jurata, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892,                     *linda.jurata@nih.gov*                     (301) 496-8032. The meeting is closed to the public.                

Dated: January 29, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-02044 Filed 2-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 41047 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JOSE DANIEL LOPEZ

- LINARES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:16

- CR

- 285

- 1

Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Daniel Lopez

Linares has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez

- Linares h a s not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 18 , 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-41047 Document: 00513956263 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2017No. 16

- 41047

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-41047 Document: 00513956263 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2017
The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the *

Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

E. JOYCE GLASGOW,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

Social Security,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-35943

D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00410-CRD

Western District of Washington, 

Seattle

ORDER

Before: GOULD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ, District Judge. * 

The memorandum disposition filed on December 29, 2009, is amended as

follows: On page 3, line 14, replace <examiner> with <expert, Dr. McKnight>. 

On page 3, line 18, replace <examiner’s> with <expert’s>.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the

petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for

rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the

matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the

FILED

MAR 11 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or

rehearing en banc shall be entertained.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D. Gary Fife, President of Big Bear Gold Corporation, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Big Bear Gold Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 20, 2004

/s/ D. Gary Fife				D. Gary Fife
President (Principal Executive Officer)
Joinder Agreement signed by 4186524 Canada Inc., 4145321 Canada Inc., BRP Nova



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 Exhibit A 
  
 BOMBARDIER RECREATIONAL PRODUCTS INC. 
 (a
Canadian corporation) 
  
 $200,000,000 Senior Subordinated Notes
due 2013 
  
 December 18, 2003 
  
 MERRILL LYNCH & CO. 

	MERRILL	LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED 


	UBS	SECURITIES LLC 

 HARRIS NESBITT CORP. 
 RBC DOMINION SECURITIES CORPORATION 

	c/o	Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated 

 4
World Financial Center 
 New York, New York 10080 
 As Representative of the several Initial Purchasers 
  
 Ladies and
Gentlemen: 
  
 Reference is hereby made to that certain purchase
agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), dated as of December 11, 2003, among Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., a Canadian corporation (the “Company”), and the Representative on behalf of the Initial Purchasers.
Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Purchase Agreement. 
  
 Each of the undersigned hereby acknowledges that it has received and reviewed a copy of the Purchase Agreement, and acknowledges and agrees to (i) join
and become a party to the Purchase Agreement as a Guarantor as indicated by its signature below and to execute and deliver the Indenture and the Registration Rights Agreement and to deliver a notation of its Guarantee to be endorsed on each Note
authenticated under the Indenture; (ii) be bound by all covenants, agreements, representations, warranties and acknowledgments of a Guarantor in the Purchase Agreement; and (iii) perform all obligations and duties required of a Guarantor pursuant to
the Purchase Agreement. Each of the undersigned hereby makes as of the date hereof all of the representations and warranties of a Guarantor in the Purchase Agreement. 
  
 This Joinder Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but
all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same Joinder Agreement. 
  

 B-1 








 THIS JOINDER AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW
YORK. 
  
 [Signature Page Follows] 
  

 Sch C-2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has caused this Joinder Agreement to be duly executed and
delivered in New York, New York, by its proper and duly authorized officer as of the date set forth above. 
  

			
	 [GUARANTORS]

		
	By:	 	 
	 	 	 Name:

	 	 	 Title:



  

 Sch C-3 








 CONFIRMED AND ACCEPTED, 
 as
of the date first above written: 
  
 MERRILL LYNCH & CO. 

	MERRILL	LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH 

 INCORPORATED 

	UBS	SECURITIES LLC 

 HARRIS NESBITT CORP. 
 RBC DOMINION SECURITIES CORPORATION 
  

					
	 By:
	 	 MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH
 INCORPORATED

			
	 	 	 By:
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 Authorized Signatory


  

 Sch C-4 








 Exhibit B 
  
 FORM OF REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT 
  
 [To be provided under separate cover] 
  

 C-1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice; update Zoom webinar registration links.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of Wednesday, December 27, 2023, concerning various meetings of the Texas Advisory Committee. The document contained outdated registrations links. These are the updated Zoom webinar registration links as follows:                    

                        February 15:                         *https://www.zoomgov.com/​s/​1612870248*

                        March 19:                         *https://www.zoomgov.com/​s/​1615522515*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Brooke Peery, (202) 701-1376,                         *bpeery@usccr.gov.*

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of Wednesday, December 27, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-28560, on page 89366, first and second columns, all times remain the same 12 p.m.-1 p.m. mountain time.                    

Dated: February 6, 2024.

David Mussatt,

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.

[FR Doc. 2024-02686 Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10148 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee

v. CELESTE MONETTE BLAIR,
Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15 -CR- 152 -9

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Celeste Monette Blair has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Blair ha s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 17, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10148 Document: 00513954131 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2017No. 16

- 10148

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-10148 Document: 00513954131 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2017