Kiln Scrubber

Stack

rESTING LOCATION Gell Brick Road Ridge, Virginia

PREPARED FOR Ms. Martha

West General Shale Brick 3211 N. Roan Street Johnson City, Tennessee

3 760

March 2005

Chris LeMay Project Manager

PREPARED BY E. Roberts Alley & Associates,

Inc. 1931 Central Parkway SW, Suite S Decatm-, AL 35601 Phone: (256) 351-0121 Fax: (256) 351-0151 ERA&A Project No. 2004-0675AAppendix

A Appefidix B Appendix C •p•efidix D Appendix E General

Shale

Brick 770 Webster

Road Blue Ridge, Virginia

TABLE OFCONTENTS
Introduction Page 1.1 Facility & Source Description 1.2 Control Device Description 1.3 Test Team & Contact Information

.................................... 1.4 Protocol/Methodology

Deviations ..................................... 1-1 Summary of Results

.......................................... Testing Methodology 3.1 Volmnetric

Flow Rate

........................... Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide

........................................................................... -2 Particulate Matter ............................................................................................. 3-2 Particulate < 10 microns:
.................................................................................... 3-2 Hydrogen Fluoride (Inlet)

............................................................... 3-3 Hydrogen Fluoride (Outlet)

........................................................... -3 Sulfur Dioxide (Inlet)

......................................................................................... 3-3 Sulfur Dioxide (Outlet)

........................................................................ -3 Visible Emission Evaluations

............................................................................... 3-4

APPENDICES Summary of Calculations Field Data Laborato W Data Quality Control Data Process Operating

DataGeneral Shale

Brick 770 Webster

Road Blue Ridge, Virginia

TABLE OF CONTENTS

continued

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2-1

Summary

of Emission Testing Results Table 2-2

Summary

of PM-10/SO2

Testing Results Table 2-3

Summm'y

of PM/HF Testing Results Table 3-1

Source Testing Methodology Table A- 1 PM-10/SO2

VFR Calculations Table A-2

PM-10/SO2

Emission Calculations Table A-3

PM/HF VFR Calctflations Table A-4

PM/HF Emission

Calculations Table A-5

HF/SO2 Inlet Rate CalculationsIntroductionGeneral Shale Brick •;,,•,,,,,J,,,,•,,•. •,•,,,,, ,•,•, •,•,,,,•, ,•. .•ti.•, Compliance

Emission Test Report Introduction
BI•e Riagei Vifgini•

1.0 Introduction

E. Roberts Alley & Associates,

Inc. (ERA&A)

was retained by General Shale Brick (General Shale) to conduct compliance emission testing on the Kiln Scrubber Stack at its Blue Ridge, Virginia facility (facility #20447).

The purpose of the testing was to demonstrate

compliance

with emission limits detailed in the facility's air permit. 1.1 Facility and Source Description
General Shale's Blue Ridge Facility manufactures

brick exterior building material.

Shale and clay are mined, crushed and sent through a screening

process prior to brick forming.

The brick is formed by extrusion.

Once the brick is extruded,

it is dried and fired in a tunnel Kiln at approximately

2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

The Blue Ridge Facility has two Kilns (A & B) with a common exhaust.

After being fired, the brick is cooled, packaged

and shipped to varions locations.
1.2 Control System Description
The Kiln emissions

are controlled

with a lime-injected,

dry scrubber.

The emission testing was performed

on the scrubber exhaust stack located outside the kiln building on the east side. 1.3 Test Team and Contact Information The emission

testing was conducted

by Mr. Ryan O'Dea, Team Leader/Mobile

Lab Operator,

Mr. Stacey Cunningham, Isokinetic

Train Operator,

and Mr. Dusten Dutton, Technician.

Instrumental

test data was recorded on site in ERA&A's

mobile laboratory.

Mr. GaD' Jones and Mr. Mike Whitehead

of General Shale served as ERA&A's on-site contacts and coordinated

the testing with facility operations. 1.4 Protocol/Method

Deviations
ERA&A's last protocol (General Shale Roanoke Protocol

Rev. 2), dated February

17, 2005, stated that EPA Reference Method 6C would be used to determine

the inlet sulfur dioxide mass rate while the outlet emission rate would be measured

in accordance

with EPA Method 6. Before the on site testing was initiated, General Shale received approval to use Kiln fuel (coal and natural gas) data to calculate

the inlet sulfur dioxide mass rate. Therefore, ERA&A measured

the outlet emission rate in accordance

with EPA Method 6C. E RA&A s protocol did not reference

inlet hydrogen

fluoride sampling or emission estimation

procedures.

ERA&A did use an AP-42 emission factor to calculate the inlet hydrogen

fluoride rate to satisfy a facility permit required removal efficiency.

c:\\Projects\Ge neralS hale\2005_0077\EmissioffrestReport Page 1-1ResultsGeneral Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summaly of Results

2.0 Summary

of Results
ERA&A conducted

a total of three (3) test runs for Particulate

Matter and Hydrogen

Fluoride on February 23, 2005 and three (3) test runs for Particulate

< 10 microns and Sulfur Dioxide on February

24, 2005. All testing was conducted on the Kiln Scrubber

exhaust stack. The arithmetic

average of these three (3) test runs was used to determine source compliance

for each pollutant.

Tables 2-1 through 2-3 contain a summary

of the compliance testing results. Any difference

between the summary

results listed in the following

tables and the detailed results contained in Appendix

A is due to rounding for presentation.

TABLE

2-1 •;UMMARY OF EMISSION

TESTING

RESULTS

Emission Rate, Ibs/hr 3.3

2.6

3.3

3.0 Permitted Limit, [bs/hr Percent of Limit, % 19.6 Sulfi•r Dioxide Emission Rate, lbs/hr Permitted Limit, Ibs/hr Percent of Limit, % Sulfur Dioxide Control Control Efficiency,

% Permitted Limit, % Particulate Matter Emission Rate, lbs/hr Permitted Limit, lbs/hr Percent of Limit, % Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr Hydrogen Flnoride Control Control Efficiency,

% Permitted Limit, % 15.4

15.9

36 16

5.5 4.9

0.07 0.08
97 97

15.6

17

8.0

0.07
97

16
15.636.7243
2310

25.224
0.07
97
o•

c:\\Projects\GeneralShalek2005-0077\EmissionTeslRepo•l Page 2-1General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Results

TABLE 2-2 SUMMARY Ot• PM-I 0/SO2 TESTING

J•ESULTS

DateStart Trine 2/24/05

2/24/05

2/24/05 8;07 9:49

11:22 Stop Time 9:12

10:51

12:24 Run Time(PM10), rain 62.39

56.31

61.55 Run Time (SO2), rain 60

60

60 rrocess Oata Gas Used, x l03 SCF 7.81

7.45

8.24 Coal Used, lbs 1,424

1,470

1,454 Control Data Lime Feed Rate, lbs/hr 92.6

92.6

92.6 Sulfur Dioxide Inlet SO2 from Gas, x 10 -3 lbs/hr 4.5

4.2

4.7 SO2 from Coal, lbs/hr 24.2

18.9

18.7 SO2 Total, lbs/hr 24.2

18.9

18.7 Stack Conditions Temperature,

°F 283

281

281 Moisture, % 7.7

7.9

7.9 Velocity, fps 24.6

24.7

24.5 VFR, x 104 dscfm 2.3

2.3

2.3 Particulate < l0 microns Concentration, x 10 .2 grains/dscf 1.7

1.3

1.7 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 3.3

2.6

3 g Sulfur Dioxide Outlet Concentration, ppmvd 68.7

70.2

69.4 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 15.4

15.9

15.6 Based on an AP-42 emission factor of 0.6 pounds per 106 standard cubic feet and assuming 95% conversion Based on fuel samples and analyses for sulfur content and assuming 95% conversion 60.08

7.831,449
92.6
4.520.620.6
2827.824.62.3
1.6

69,41516

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\2005_0077\EmissionTestRepo•l Page 2-2General Shale Brick •:,,,•,,,,,,,,.,,t,,/. •,•,,•,,.,. •,,,7/,J,,• x•.t.. Compliance

Emission Test Report Summary of Results

TABLE 2-3 SUMMARY O• PM/HF

TESTING

•ESULTS

Start Time Stop Time Run Time, rain Production Data Bricks fired per hour Brick weight (each), lbs Hydrogen Fluoride Inlet Emission Rate, lbs/hr" Stack Conditions Temperature,

°F Moisture, % Velocity, fps VFR, x 104 dscfm Pa rticulate Matter Concentration, x 10 -• grains/dscf Emission Rate, Ibs/hr Hydrogen Fluoride Outlet 15:0760 17:1018:1360

2788.623.52.2
3.05.5 16:4660

2808.022.62.1
2.74.9 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.07

0.08 Based on an AP-42 factor of 0.17 pounds Hydrogen Fluoride per ton of brick fired

2798.523.12.1
4.48.0
0.07

8,2293.6
2.52
2798.423.12.1
3.46il

• (Y7

c:\•Projects\GeneraiShaleL2005_0077\EmissionTestReport Page 2-3Testing MethodologyGeneral Shale Brick L•,.•,,,,,,,,.,,•,Tz •:,,•,•,,.,.,,•, •,.•,•, •..•;,,/i.,,. Compliance

Emission Test Report Testing Methodolo• Ge•6ral ShaleB•ic•

.....

• •dg• virginia

3.0 Testing Methodology
The emission testing program was conducted

in accordance

with the U.S. EPA Reference

Methods summarized

in Table 3-I. Method descriptions

and quality assurance

data are provided in the referenced

appendices.

TABLE 3-1 SOURCE TESTING

•/IETHODOLOG¥

Volumetric Flow Rate Oxygen/Carbon Dioxide Particulate Matter Particulate < 10 microns Hydrogen Fluoride (Inlet) Hydrogen Fluoride (Outlet) Sulfur Dioxide (Inlet) Sulfur Dioxide (Outlet) Visible Emissions 1,2,3A,4

3.1

D 3A 3.2

D

Instrumental

Analysis 5 3.3

D

Isokinetic

Sampling 201A 3.4

D

Constant Rate Sampling AP-42 Factor

3.5

D

Calculated 26A 3.6

D

Isokinetic

Sampling AP-42 Factor

3.7

D

Coal Analysis/Calculated 6C 3.8

D

Instrumental 9 3.9

D

Certified Evaluator

3.1 Volmnetric

Flow Rate
The sampling location and number of traverse points were selected in strict accordance

with EPA Reference

Method 1. The stack gas velocity pressure was measured

using an S-type pitot and an inclined manometer.

The velocity of the stack gas was determined

in strict accordance

with EPA Reference

Method 2. A total of twelve traverse points were used to measure the average stack gas velocity pressure. The oxygen and carbon monoxide

concentrations

were determined

in strict accordance

with EPA Reference

Method 3A. See Section 3.2 for Method 3A testing methodology.

The stack gas moisture content Was determined

in strict accordance with EPA Method 4. The moisture removal system consisted

of four (4) impingers.

The first two (2) impingers contained

100 mL of water, the third impinger was empty, and the fourth contained

approximately

200 grams of silica gel. The impinger contents were either measured

gravimetrically

and/or volumetrically

before and after each test run.
c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\2005_OO77•EmissionTestReporl Page 3-1General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Test#tg Methodology

3.2 Oxygen / Carbon Dioxide
The concentrations

of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the stack gas were determined

in strict accordance

with EPA Reference Method 3A. The stack gas was withdrawn

through a stainless sample probe, heated Teflon sample line(s), and gas conditioning

system to a CAI Model 200P O2/CO2 analyzer.

The gas conditioning

system was a non-contact condenser

used to remove the stack gas moisture.

Data was acquired online and reported in one-minute averages.

An analyzer calibration

and system bias check were performed

before testing was initiated.

A system bias/drift check was also conducted

following

the completion

of each 60-minute

test run. Additional

analyzer calibrations were conducted

as needed.

EPA Protocol

calibration

gases were used to conduct analyzer calibrations,

drift checks, and system bias checks. ERA&A also utilized a laboratory

and field certified

(EPA Method 205) gas dilution system to accurately

split high range calibration

gas to meet the requirements

of EPA Reference

Method 3A. Copies of all calibration

gas certificates

and Method 205 data can be found in Appendix

D.

3.3 Particulate

Matter The particulate

testing was conducted

in strict accordance

with EPA Reference

Method 5. The sampling

train consisted of a glass nozzle, glass-lined

probe, pre-weighed

Teflon filter, gas conditioning

system, and dry gas meter. Three (3) 60-minute

test runs were conducted

on the scrubber stack. The gas stream was sampled isokinetically

by adjusting the sample flow rate to correspond

to the flow conditions

at each sampling

(traverse)

point. After each test run, the sample train was leak checked at a vacuum pressure equal to or greater than the maximum

pressure reached during the test run. The probe and nozzle were rinsed with acetone after each run to remove the adhering particulate

matter. The front half of the filter holder was also rinsed with acetone, and this rinse was added to the probe/nozzle

rinse. Thepreweighed filter was carefully removed and placed in its sample container.

All containers

were sealed, labeled, and liquid levels marked for transport to the ERA&A laboratory

in Decatur, Alabama. The mass of particulate

matter collected in the probe and nozzle was determined

by evaporating

the acetone rinse in a pre-weighed

glass beaker and then weighing

the residue until a constant weight was obtained.

The filter loading was determined

by subtracting

the final constant filter weight from the initial constant weight. The total particulate loading, which was used to calculate the concentration

of particulate

matter in the exhaust gas, was determined

by adding these two weights. All weight measurements

were made on the same balance (accurate to 0.1 rag).

3.4 Particulate

< 10 microns (PM-10) The PM-10 concentration

in the stack gas was determined

in strict accordance

with EPA Reference

Method 201A. The PM-10 in the source gas was withdrawn

at a constant rate through a stainless steel nozzle, cyclone, and collected on an in-stack glass fiber filter. Three (3) 60-minute

test runs were conducted

on the scrubber stack. Following the completion

of each test run, ERA&A recovered

the filter in sample Container

1. The PM-10 portion of the cyclone was rinsed with acetone and collected in sample Container

2. The nozzle and greater than PM-10 side of the cyclone were rinsed with acetone and the rinse was discarded.

ERA&A performed

the filterable PM-10 analysis at its laboratory

in Decatur, Alabama.
c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\2005.0077\EmissionTestRepor• Page 3-2Alle e AssoCiates General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Testing Methodology

3.5 Hydrogen

Fluoride (Inlet) The inlet hydrogen

fluoride rate was determined

using an AP-42 factor of 0.17 pounds per ton of brick fired. General Shale provided production

data which allowed ERA&A to calculate the tons of brick fired per hour. The hydrogen fluoride inlet rate was calculated

based on the AP-42 factor and production

data.

3.6 Hydrogen

Fluoride (Outlet) The hydrogen

fluoride emission testing was conducted

in strict accordance

with EPA Reference

Method 26A and in conjunction with the particulate

emission testing. After determining

the amount of condensed

moisture in each impinger, the absorbing

solution (0.1 N H2SO4) from the first and second impingers

and the absorbing

solution (0.1 N NaOH) from the third and fourth impingers

were placed into separate 1000 mL glass sample containers.

The back half of the filter holder and all glassware

leading to the outlet of the second impinger was rinsed with DI water and placed in the H2SO4 absorbing

solution sample container.

All glassware,

from the inlet of the third impinger to the outlet of the fourth impinger,

was rinsed with DI water and placed in the NaOH absorbing

solution sample container. All of the samples were sealed, labeled, and liquid levels marked for transport to PSC Analytical

Services in Burlington,

Ontario, Canada.

3.7 Sulfur Dioxide (Inlet)
The inlet sulfur dioxide rate is the combined

sulfur dioxide rate from coal and gas used during each test run. The inlet SO2 rate from gas was calculated

using an AP-42 factor of 0.6 pounds of SO2 per million standard cubic feet of gas and assuming

95% conversion.

To determine

the SO2 rate from coal, General Shale procured

coal samples during each test run and submitted

them to Standard Laboratories,

Freeburg,

Illinois for sulfur analysis.

ERA&A calculated the SO2 concentration

on a dry basis assuming

95% conversion.

The average coal SO2 and gas SO2 were combined to determine

the average inlet SO2 rate.

3.8 Sulfur Dioxide (Outlet)
The sulfur dioxide outlet testing was conducted

in strict accordance

with EPA Reference

Method 6C. Three (3) 60- minute test runs were performed

on the scrubber exhaust gas. The stack gas was withdrawn

through a stainless sample probe, heated Teflon sample line(s), and gas conditioning

system to a Western Research

Model 721M SO2 analyzer. The gas conditioning

system was a non-contact

condenser

used to remove the stack gas moistm'e.

Data was acquired online and reported in one-minute

averages.
An analyzer calibration

and system bias check were performed

before testing was initiated.

A system bias/drift check was also conducted

following

the completion

of each 60-minute

test run. Additional

analyzer calibrations were conducted

as needed. EPA Protocol

calibration

gases were used to conduct analyzer calibrations,

drift checks, and system bias checks. ERA&A also utilized a laboratory

and field certified (EPA Method 205) gas dilution system to accurately

split high range calibration

gas to meet the requirements

of EPA Reference

Method 3A. Copies of all calibration

gas certificates

and Method 205 data can be found in Appendix

D.

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\2005-0077\EmissionTestReport

Page 3-3Asse a es General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Testing l•fethodology

3.9 Visible Emission

Evaluations
The visible emission evaluations

(VEEs) were conducted

in strict accordance

with EPA Reference

Method 9. The opacity was evaluated

for one-hour periods during each particulate

test run. Opacity readings were read at fifteen- second intervals and recorded on a field data sheet. The field data also consisted

of the stack height, evaluators distance and direction from the source, wind direction,

wind speed, ambient temperature,

sky conditions,

color of background, plume color, and the angle of the sun in relation to the observer and the source. A Certified visible emission evaluator conducted

all of the VEEs. Copies of the visible emission evaluators'

certification

can be found in Appendix

D.

c:\\Proj ects\GeneralS hale\2005.0077\EmissionTestRepor• Page 3-4Appendix A770 Web•i•{ R0ad • Biu6 •dgel V•ginia General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summwy of Calculations

SAMPLE CALCULATIONS

Meter Pressure (Pro), in. Hg

Run 1, PM/HF,

2/23/05

AH Pm Pb + 13.6

Pm 30.21 in. Hg +

where,

Pb barometric

pressure, in. Hg AH Pressure differential

of orifice in. H20 1.383 in. H20

30.31 in. Hg 13. 6 in. H20/in. Hg

Absolnte Stack Gas Pressure

(Ps), in. Hg

Ps Pb + Pg13.6 where, 0.10 in.HeO Ps 30. 21 in. Hg + 13.6 in. H20/in. Hg

Pb barometric

pressure, in. Hg Pg Static Pressure, in. H20 30.22 in. Hg

Standard Meter Volume (Vmstd), dscf

Vmstd 17.647 × Y × Vm ×Pm Tm

where,

Y meter correction

factor Vm meter volume, cf Pm= meter pressure, in. Hg Tm meter temperature,

°R 17. 647 °R/in. Hg x 1.008 x 37.087 cf x 30. 31 in. Hg 530. 3 °R 37. 706 dscf

c:\•Projects\GeneralShale\2005.0077\EmissionTestRepm•

Page A-1Standard Wet Volume (Vwstd), scf Vwstd O. 04 70 7 x Vlc

where, Vwstd=O.O4707 fi3/mLx75.6

mL 3.558 scf General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calculations

Vlc volume of H20 collected,

ml

Moisture Fraction

(Bws)

Bws Vwstd 3.558 scf (Vwstd + Vmstd)

3.558 scf + 37. 706 dscf

O. 086
where, Vwstd standard wet volume, scf Vmstd standard meter volume, dscf
Moisture Content (MC), % MC BwsxlO0

0,086x100

8.6%where, Molecular Weight (DRY) (Md), Ib/lb-mole Bws moisture fraction, dimensionless

Md (0. 44 x % CO:) + (0.32 x % 0•) + (0.28 (100- % CO:- % 0•)) Md (0.44 x 3.8) + (0.32 x 16.7) + (0.28 (100 3.8 16. 7)) 29.28 lb/lb mole CO2 carbon dioxide concentration,

%d 02 oxygen concentration,

%d Molecular Weight (WET) (Ms), lb/Ib-mole

where,

Ms Md (1 Bws) + 18 (Bws)

where,

Md molecular

weight (DRY), lb/lb-mole Bws moisture fraction, dimensionless Ms 29.28 Ib/lb-mole

(1-0.086)

+18(0.086)

28.30 lb/lb-mole
Average Velocity (Vs), ft/sec

Vs=85.49 xCpx•P

avg. x] TsPsx Ms

c:\•'roj ects\GeneralShaleL2005-0077\EmissionTestRepm• Page A-2scc (°R)On.H20)
Vs 23.5 fi/sec where, General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calcalations Cp pitot tube coefficient Delta P velocity head of stack gas, in. H20 Ts absolute stack temperature,

°R Ps absolute stack gas pressure,

in. Hg Ms molecular

weight of stack gas, lb/lb-mole

×0.84x0.352 in. H20x I

737.6 °R 30.22 in. Hgx28.30

lb/lb-mole

Average Stack Gas Flow at Stack Conditions

(Qa), acfm Qa 60 x Vs x As

where, Qa

Vs stack gas velocity, ft/sec As cross-sectional

area of stack, ft z 60 sec/min x 23.5 fi/sec x 23.22 fi: 3:3E +04 acfm
Average Stack Gas Flow at Standard

Conditions

(Qs), dscfm Qs =17.647

x Qax (1- Bws) x--Tswhere,

Qa average stack gas flow at stack conditions,

ft3/min Bws moisture fraction (dimensionless) Ps absolute stack gas pressure, in. Hg Ts absolute stack temperature,

°R R Qs=17.647--x3.3E+04 acf x(l_O.086)

x in. Hg

rain

30.22 in. Hg 737. 6 °R 2:2 E • 04 dscfm

Particulate Coucentration

(cs), grains/dscf

C S M,, x0.0154 Vmstd where, 72.3mgx 0.0154 grains/mg 37.706 dscf Mn particulate

mass from filter and fi'ont half rinse, mg Vmstd standard meter volume, dscf
3.0 E 02 grains / dscf

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale'O.005-0077\EmissionTestReport Page A-3Particulate Emission

Rate (PMR), lbs/hr
c.,. xQs'x 60 PMR 7000 where, General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calculations

c• particulate

concentration,

grains/dscf Qs stack gas flow at std. cond., dscfm

PMR 3.0 E 02 grains/dscf×

2.2E + 04 dscf/min×6Omin/hr 7000 grains / lb 5.47 lbs / hr

HF Emission

Rate (ER•v), lbs/hr
MHr xQ,,. x60 v,,,.•,ct 4.54E + 05 where,
0.9rag x 2.2 E + 04 dscfm x 60min/hr 37.706dscfx 4.54E + 05 mglb

MHF HF mass, mg Qs stack gas flow at std. cond., dscfm Vmstd standard meter volume, dscf
0.07 lbs / hr

SO2 Emission

Rate (ERso2), Ibs/hr ERso,. Cso, x MWso" x Qs x 60 x 28. 32 24. 04 x 1. OE + 06 x 454

where, Cso2 SO2 concentration,

ppmvd MWso2 SO 2 molecular

weight (64.1 g/g-mole) Qs outlet volumetric

flow rate, dscfm ERso 2 68. 7 uL/L x 64.1 g/g mole x 2.3 E + 04 dscfm x 60 min/hr x 28.32 L/cf 24. 04 L/g mole x 1. OE + 06 uL/L x 454 g/lb 15.43 lbs / hr

HF Inlet Rate (IRrw), Ibs/hr
]R HF

2000 where,

AP AP-42 factor, lbs/ton of brick fired Pb brick Production,

brick fired/hour Wb brick weight, Ibs

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\2005-0077\EmissionTestReport

Page A-4General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calculations
O. 17lbs / ton brick × 8, 229 bricks/hr

× 3.6 lbs / brick

2.521bs / hr 2000 lbs / ton

HF Removal Efficiency

(RE,w), % IRHF ERH• REm: × 1 O0 [RHF

2. 5 21bs/hour

O. 07 lbs.hour 2. 521bs/hour

× 100 97.2%

SO2 Inlet Rate (IRso2), lbs/hr
__Gas, (IRGso__•2) IRGso,. AP × GR x C

where,

AP AP-42 factor, lbs/1.0E+06

scf GR gas used x 1.0E+03 scf C conversion,

assuming

95% IRGso2 0.6 Ibs/1.OE

+ 06 scf x 7.81E + 03 scf × 0.95 4.5E 03 lbs / hr

Coal (IRCso,,•z) IRCso: CR × (1 MC 0 x SC x C x 2 where,

CR coal used, lbs/hr MCc coal moisture fraction SC coal sulfur content C conversion,

assuming

95% IRCso_, 1,4241bs/hour

x (1 0.0161) x 0.0091 x 0.95 x 64.1 g / gmole 32.1 g / gmole IRCso., 24.2 lbs/hour Tota____]IRso•, IRGso: + IRCso•

24.2 lbs / hr

c:\\Prqiects\Genera S hale\2005-0077\EmissionTestReport Page A-5TABLE A-1 PM- 10/S Oz VFR CALCULATIONS General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calculations

Run Number 2

3

Average Date 02/24/05

02/24/05

02/24/05 Start Time 8:07 AM

9:49 AM

11:22 AM Stop Time 9:12 AM

10:51 AM

12:24 PM Run Time, rain 62.39

56.31

61.55

60.08 Point 0.13

0.15

0.14

0.14 Point 2 0.14

0.14

0.13

0.14 Point 3 0.13

0.14

0.13

0.13 Point 4 0.13

0.13

0.14

0.13 Point 5 0.13

0.14

0.13

0.13 Point 6 0.13

0.14

0.13

0.13 Point 7 0.15

0.14

0.14

0.14 Point 8 0.14

0.14

0.14

0.14 Point 9 0.13

0.14

0.13

0.13 Point 10 0.13

0.13

0.13

0.13 Point 11 0.13

0.13

0.13

0.13 Point 12 0.14

0.12

0.14

0.13 Square Root of Delta P, (in. H20) Pitot Tube Coefficient

(Cp) Barometric Pressure (Pb), in. Hg Static Pressure (Pg), in. H20 Stack Pressure (Ps), in. Hg Stack Diameter, in. Stack Cross-sectional

Area, ft Temperature (Ts), Moisture Content (MC), % CO2 Concentration

(CO2), % 02 Concentration

(O2), % Molecular Weight (Md), lb/lb-mole

(dry) Molecular Weight (Ms), lb/lb-mole

(wet) ft/sec

0.366

0.370

0.366

0.367 0.84 0.84

0.84

0.84 30.05 30.05

30.05

30.05 0.10 0.12

0.12

0.11 30.06 30.06

30.06

30.06 65.3 65.3

65.3

65.3 23.22 23.22

23.22

23.22 283.3 281.2

280.5

281.7 7.7 7.9

7.9

7.8 3.6 3.7

3.8

3.7 16.3 16.3

16.3

16.3 29.23 29.24

29.26

29.24 28.37 28.36

28.37

28.36 24.6 24.7

24.5

24.6 Volumetric Flow Rate At Stack Conditions

(Qa), ACFM At Standard Conditions

(Qs), DSCFM

34,210

34,476

34,148

34,278 22,538 22,735

22,518

22,597

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\2005-0077\EmissionTestReport Page A-6General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calculations
TABLE A-2 PM-10/SO2 EMISSION

CALCULATIONS

Run Number DateStart TimeTime

Run Time (PM-10), rain Run Time (SO2), rain Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Meter Correction

Factor Orifice Calibration

Value Meter Volume, ft Meter Temperature,

°F Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20 Volume H20 Collected,

mL Nozzle Diameter,

in Area of Nozzle, ft Filterable PM-10 Mass, mg Sulfur Dioxide Concentration,

Standard Meter Volume, ft Standard Water Volume, ft Moisture Fraction (Measured) Meter Pressure, in Hg Volnme at Nozzle, ft Isokinetic Sampling Rate, % (+/- 20%) Orifice Calibration

Checks, % (+/- 5%)
Filterable PM-10 Concentration,

gr/dscf Filterable PM-10 Emission Rate, Ibs/hr SO2 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 2

3 Average 02/24/05 02/24/05

02/24/05 8:07 AM 9:49 AM 11:22 AM 9:12 AM 10:51 AM 12:24 PM (0pMio) 62.39

56.31

61.55

60.08 (0so2) 60

60

60

60 (Pb) 30.05

30.05

30.05

30.05 (Y) 1.008

1.008

1.008

1.008 (Delta H@)

1.968

1.968

1.968

1.968 (Vm) 24.126

22.471

24.358

23.652 (Tm) 66.7

69.0

68.8

68. (Delta H) 0.575

0.576

0.575

0.575 (Vlc) 43.3

41.2

45.2

43.2 (Dn) 0.264

0.264

0.264

0.264 (An) 0.00038

0.00038

0.00038

0.00038 (Mn) 26.9

19.7

27.0

24.5 68.7 70.2

69.4

69.4 (Vmstd) 24.521

22.740

24.657

23.973 (Vwstd) 2.038

1.939

2.128

2.035 (BWS) 0.077

0.079

0.079

0.078 (Pro) 30.09

30.09

30.09

30.09 (Vn) 37.22

34.48

37.39

36.37 (I) 106.5

108.5

108.7

107.9 (Ycheck) -3.2%

-0.3%

-1.0%

-1.5% (Cs) 0.0169

0.0133

0.0169

0.0157 (PMR) 3.26

2.60

3.25

3.04 (ERso2) 15.43

15.90

15.57

15:63

c:\\Proj ects\GeneralS hale\2005-0077\EmissionTestRepol.t Page A-7TABLE A-3 PNI/HF VFR CALCULATIONS General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calculations

Run Number DateStart Time Stop Time Run Time, rain 2

3

Average 02/23/05 02/23/05

02/23/05 2:01 PM

3:40 PM

5:10 PM 3:07 PM

4:46 PM

6:13 PM 60 60

60

60 PointPoint 2 Point 3 Point 4 Point 5 Point 6 Point 7 Point 8 Point 9 Point 0 Point 11 Point 12 0.13

0.12

0.12

0.12 0.13 0.13

0.13

0.13 0.12 0.12

0.13

0.12 0.13 0.11

0.12

0.12 0.12 0.10

0.11

0.11 0.12 0.11

0.13

0.12 0.12 0.12

0.12

0.12 0.13 0. I1

0.13

0.12 0.12 0.12

0.13

0.12 0.12 0.12

0.12

0.12 0.13 0.12

0.10

0.12 0.12 0.10

0.10

0.11 Square Root of Delta P, (in. H20) Pitot Tube Coefficient

(Cp) Barometric Pressure (Pb), in. Hg Static Pressure (Pg), in. H20 Stack Pressure (Ps), in. Hg Stack Diameter, in. Stack Cross-sectional

Area, ft'x2 Temperature (Ts), Moisture Content, % CO2 Concentration

(CO2), % 02 Concentration

(02), % Molecular Weight (Md), lb/lb-mole

(dry) Molecular Weight (Ms), lb/lb-mole

(wet) ft/sec

0.352

0.339 0.84 0.84 30.21 30.21 0.10 0.10 30.22 30.22 65.3 65.3 23.22 23.22 "277.6 ,279.8 8.6 8.0 3.8 3.8 "16.7 16.7 29.28 29.28 28.30 28.39 23.5 22.6

0.3460.8430.210.1130.2265.323.22279.4"8.53.617.029.2628.3023.1

0.3460.8430.210.1030.2265.323.2227898:43.716829.2728.3323.1 Volumetric Flow Rate At Stack Conditions

(Qa), ACFM At Standard Conditions

(Qs), DSCFM -32,735

31,484

32,196

32;138 21,625 20,915

21,243

21,261

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\2005 -0077\EmissionTestRepml Page A-8General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calculations
PM/HF EMISSION

CALCULATIONS

Run Number DateStart TimeTime

Run Time, rain Barometric Pressure, in. Hg Meter Correction

Factor Orifice Calibration

Value Meter Volume, Meter Temperature,

°F Meter Orifice Pressure, in. H20 Volume H20 Collected, mL Nozzle Diameter, in Area of Nozzle, fl^2 Particulate Mass, mg

Standard Meter Volume, ft Standard Water Volume, ft Moisture Fraction (Measured) Meter Pressure, in Hg Volume at Nozzle, ft•'3 Isokinetic Sampling Rate, (%) Run

Run 2 2/23/2005 2/23/2005 2:01 PM

3:40 PM 3:07 PM

4:46 PM

Run 3 Average 2/23/2005 5:IOPM 6:13 PM ((9) 60

60

60

60 (Pb) 30.21

30.21

30.21

30.21 (Y) 1.008

1.008

1.008

1.008 (Delta H@)

1.968

1.968

1.968

1.968 (Vm) 37.087

35.745

36.608

36.480 (Tin) 70.3

72.7

71.5

71.5 (Delta H)

1.383

1.258

1.325

1.322 (Vlc) 75.6

65.4

73.4

71.5 (Dn) 0.350

0.350

0.350

0.350 (An) 0.00067

0.00067

0.00067

0.00067 (Mn) 72.3

63.7

105.9

80.6 0.9 1.1

0.9

1.0 (Vmstd) 37.706

36.169

37.135

37.004 (Vwstd) 3.558

3.078

3.455

3.364 (BWS) 0.086

0.078

0.085

0.083 (Pro) 30.31

30.30

30.31

30.31 (Vn) 57.08

54.45

56.29

55.94 (I) 101.0%

100.2%

101.3%

100.8%

Particulate Concentration,

grains/dscf

(Cs)

0.0295 Particulate Emission Rate, lbs/hr

(PMR)

5.47 Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr

(ER•)

0.07

0.0271

0.0439

0.0335 4.86 '8.00

6.11 0.08 0.07

0:07

c:\\Proj ects\GeneralShale\2005-0077\EmissionTestReport Page A-9General Shale Brick Compliance Emission Test Report Summary of Calculations TABLE HF/SO2 INLET •ATE CALCULATIONS

Run Number Date 2

3 2/23/05 2/23/05

2/23/05

Mean AP-42 Factor, lbs/ton of brick fired Brick Production,

per hr Brick Weight, lbs/brick Fluoride Rate, Ibs/hr

Run Number Date 2

3 2/24/05 2/24/05

2/24/05

0.178,2293.62:52

Mean Sulfur Dioxide from Gas AP-42 Factor, lbs/106 scf Conversion, % Gas Used, x 103 scf Inlet Sulfur Dioxide fi'om Gas, x 10 .3 lbs/hr Sulfur Dioxide from Coal Sulfur Content, % (dry basis) Coal Moisture Fraction, % Coal Used, lbs/hr (wet basis) Conversion, % Inlet Sulfur Dioxide from Coal, lbs/hr 0.6

0.6

0.6

0.6 95 95

95

95 7.81 7.45

8.24

7.83 4.5 4.2

4.7

4.5

0.91 0.69

0.69

0.76 1.61 1.73

1.78

1.71 1,424 1,470

1,454

1,449 95 95

95

95 24.2 18.9

18.7

20.6 Total Inlet Sulfur Dioxide, lbs/hr 24.2

18.9

18.7

20!6

c:\\Projects\GeneralShale\2005.0077\EmissionTestRepo1• Page A- 102

4

RECTANGULAR

DUC•S

2 ,t 5 6 .7 8. '9 " 10 •I_ 12 25.0 t6.7 12.5 10,0 8.3 7,1 &3 5.6 5,0 4•5 4.2 75.0 50.t 37,5 •0,0 •.5.0 21.4 18,8 '16•7 15.0 13.6 12.5. 63.3 62.5 50.0-41.7

35.7 31L3 27.8 250 22.7 20.8 87.5 70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8 88.9 35.0. 3t,8 29.2 90,0 75.0 64.3 56,3 50.0 45.0 40.9 37.5 91.7 78:6-68.8

61.1 55:0 .5&O 45.8 92,9 8•.3 72.2 65.0 59,1 54.2 93.8 83.3 .75.0 68.2 825 94.4 85.0 77.3 70,8 95.0 '86.4 79.2 95.5 87.535,8 Equfvalent diameter Dist f•'0•h'por•s• •,,×' d•i3tfi × w dth nee rest diSturba• depth • width • -._

die
MEA.SUREMENTS

12

•4ETHOD" E. ROBERTS

ALLEY&•DATE: 2/23/2005
ERA&A Analyzers Time 02 CO2
14:01:00 16.4

3.9 14:02:00 16.7

3.7 14:03:00 16.8

3.6 14:04:00 16.3

3.9 14:05:00 16.7

3.8 14:06:00 16.8

3.7 14:07:00 16.3

3.9 14:08:00 16,6

3.8 14:09:00 16.8

3.7 14:10:00 16.4

3.9 14:11:00 16.6

3,8 14:12:00 16.8

3.7 14:13:00 16.4

3.9 14:14:00 16.5

3.9 14:15:00 16.9

3.7 14:16:00 16.5

3.9 14:17:00 16.5

3.9 14:18:00 16.9

3.7 14:19:00 16.6

3.8 14:20:00 16,5

3.9 14:21:00 16.9

3.7 14:22:00 16.7

3.8 14:23:00 16.4

4.0 14:24:00 16.8

3.7 14:25:00 17.0

3.6 14:26:00 16.4

4,0 14:27:00 16.4

4.0 14:28:00 16,8

3.8 14:29:00 16.6

3.9 14:30:00 16.6

3.9 14:31:00 16.8

3.8 14:32:00 16.9

3.7 14:33:00 16.8

3.5 14:34:00 16.9

3.6 14:35:00 16.5

4.0 14:36:00 18.7

2.5 14:37:00 17.7

3.0 14:38:00 16.5

4.0 14:39:00 16.8

3.7 14:40:00 17.0

3,5 14:41:00 16.3

4.1 14:42:00 16.6

3.9 14:43:00 16.7

3.8 14:44:00 16,5

4.0 14:45:00 16.5

4.0 14:46:00 16,7

3.8 14:47:00 16.5

4.0 14:48:00 16.6

3.9 14:49:00 16.8

3.8 14:50:00 16.6

3.9 14:51:00 16.6

3.9 14:52:00 16.8

3.8 14:53:00 16.6

3.9 14:54:00 16.6

3.9 14:55:00 16.9

3.8 14:56:00 16,6

3,9 14:57:00 16.6

3.9 14:58:00 16,8

3.8 14:59:00 16.6

3.9 15:00:00 16.5

4.0

Uncorrected

Average
O2 16.7

% CO2 3,8

%

Corrected Average
02 16.7

% 002 3.8

%DATE: 2/2312005
ERA&A Analyzers Time 02 CO2
15:40:00 17.0

3.5 15:41:00 17.0

3.4 15:42:00 16.4

3.9 15:43:00 16.3

4.0 15:44:00 16.6

3.8 15:45:00 16.7

3.8 15:46:00 16.4

3.9 15:47:00 16.7

3.8 15:48:00 16.8

3.7 15:49:00 16.5

3.9 15:50:00 16.7

3.8 15:51:00 16.6

3.6 15:52:00 16.5

3,8 15:53:00 16.7

3.8 15:54:00 16.9

3.6 15:55:00 16.6

3.8 15:56:00 16.6

3.8 15:57:00 16.9

3,6 15:58:00 16.5

3.9 15:59:00 16.5

3.9 16:00:00 16.9

3.7 16:01:00 16.6

3.9 16:02:00 16.5

3.9 16:03:00 16,9

3.7 16:04:00 16.6

3.8 16:05:00 16.5

3.9 16:06:00 16.9

3.7 16:07:00 16.7

3.8 16:08:00 16.5

3.9 16:09:00 16.9

3.7 16:10:00 16.8

3.8 16:11:00 16.5

3.9 16:12:00 16.6

3,7 16:13:00 16.7

3.7 18:14:00 16.5

3.7 16:15:00 16.6

3,6 16:16:00 16.5

3.6 16:17:00 16.7

3.1 16:18:00 16.9

3.7 16:19:00 16.5

4.0 16:20:00 16.6

3.9 16:21:00 16,9

3.7 16:22:00 16.6

3.9 16:23:00 16.6

3.9 16:24:00 16,9

3.7 16:25:00 16.7

3.8 16:26:00 16.6

3.9 16:27:00 16.9

3.7 16:28:00 16.7

3.8 16:29:00 17.2

3.4 18:30:00 17.1

3.6 16:31:00 16.8

3.8 16:32:00 16.7

3.9 16:33:00 16.8

3.8 16:34:00 16.7

3.8 16:35:00 16.7

3.9 16:36:00 17.1

3.5 16:37:00 16.9

3.7 16:38:00 16.4

4.0 16:39:00 16.6

4,0

Uncorrected

Average
02 16.7

% CO2 3.8

%

Corrected Average
02 16.7

% CO2 3,8

%DATE: 2/23/2005
ERA&A Analyzers Time 02 CO2
17:10:00 16.9

3.7 17:11:00 17.1

3.6 17:12:00 16.7

3.8 17:13:00 16.9

3.8 17:14:00 17.2

3.5 17:15:00 16.5

4.0 17:16:00 16.7

3.9 17:17:00 17,0

3.7 17:18:00 16.8

3.8 17:19:00 16.7

3.9 17;20:00 17.1

3.7 17:21:00 16.9

3.8 17:22:00 16.7

3.8 17:23:00 17.1

3.6 17:24:00 16.9

3.7 17:25:00 17.5

3.3 17:26:00 17.2

3.5 17:27:00 16.8

3.8 17:28:00 16.8

3.8 17:29:00 16.9

3.7 17:30:00 16.9

3.7 17:31:00 16.8

3.8 17:32:00 17.3

3.4 17:33:00 16,8

3.8 17:34:00 16.7

3.8 17:35:00 16.9

3.7 17:36:00 16.9

3.7 17:37:00 16.9

3.7 17:38:00 17,0

3.7 17;39:00 17.0

3.7 17:40:00 17.0

3.6 17:41:00 17.0

3.6 17:42:00 17.0

3.6 17:43:00 16.9

3.5 17:44:00 16.8

3.6 17:45:00 16.8

3.6 17:46:00 16.9

3.5 17:47:00 16.9

3.5 17:48:00 17.0

3.6 17:49:00 17,1

3.5 17:50:00 17.0

3.6 17:51:00 16.9

3.6 17:52:00 17.1

3.5 17:53:00 17.0

3.6 17:54:00 16.9

3.6 17:55:00 17.1

3.5 17:56:00 17,0

3.6 17:57:00 17.0

3.6 17:58:00 17.1

3,5 17:59:00 17.0

3.6 18:00:00 17,0

3.6 18:01:00 17.1

3.5 18:02:00 17.0

3.6 18:03:00 17.0

3.5 18:04:00 17.1

3.5 18:05:00 17.0

3.6 18:06:00 17.1

3.5 18:07:00 17.1

3.5 18:08:00 17.0

3.6 18:09:00 17.0

3.6

Uncorrected

Average
02 17.0

% CO2 3.6

%

Corrected Average
02 17.0

% CO2 3,6

%Location:

General Shale- Roanoke, Virginia Date: 02/23/05 Start Time:

2:01 PM End Time:

3:07 PM

Source Kiln Scrubber

Run 1 Project No.

2005-0077 STACK DATA (EST) % Moisture: Barometric: Static Press: Stack Press: %CO2: 3.4 %02: 16.6 %N2/CO: 80.0 Md: 29.21 Ms: 28.37 Sample Time
"• (minutes) Begin End A1 0.0 5.0 2 5.0 10.0 3 10.0 15.0 4 15.0 20.0 5 20.0 25.0 6 25.0 30.0 B1 30.0 35.0 2 35.0 40.0 3 40.0 45.0 4 45.0 50.0 5 50.0 55.0 6 55.0 60.0 60.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 7.5 % est. 30.21 in Hg 0.11 in H20 30.22 in Hg%%%Ib/ib-mole Ib/Ib-moleDry Gas Meter Reading (ft 3)

990.628 993.837 996.942 999.975 1003.108 1006.142 1009.242 1012.179 1015.343 1018.428 1021.480 1024.653 1027.715

1027.715 EQUIPMENT METER BOX: 1376 Y: 1.008 DH@: 1.968 in HzO PITOT ID: P-11 Cp: 0.84

STACK DATA (EST)
Est. Tm: 80 °F Est. Ts: 276 °F Est. dP: 0.13 in H20 Est. Dn: 0.375 inches

E. Roberts Alley & Associates,

Inc. Method 5/26A Isokinetic

Data

LEAK CHECKS MOISTURE

DATA NOZZLE ID: G-07 Dn: Pre Mid 0.350 in

Leak Rate 0.001 N/A Diameter: 65.3 in Pump Vacuum

12 N/A StackArea: 23.22 ft

Pitot Tube P N/A Pitot Gas Temperatures

(°F) Orifice Press. Pump DP DGM

DH (in H20 Vac. (in. H20: Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) 0.13 70 69 272 1.46 1.46 2 0.13 64 69 277 1.44 1.44 2 0.12 65 68 278 1.33 1.33 3 0.13 68 68 279 1.44 1.44 3 0.12 71 69 279 1.33 1.33 3 0.12 73 72 279 1.34 1.34 3 0.12 71 71 275 1.34 1.34 3 0.13 73 70 277 1.45 1.45 3 0.12 74 70 278 1.34 1.34 3 0,12 75 70 279 1,34 1.34 3 0.13 76 70 279 1.45 1.45 3 0.12 71 71 279 1.34 1.34 3 Post0.000 cfrn 3 in Hg P P/F

Liquid Vol. (ml) 60 Silica Gel (mg) 15.6 Gas Temps

K FACTOR=

11.353 (°F) Imp. % ISO Vs Probe Filter Exit

(fps) 254 262 51 101.2 23.93 246 259 38 98.8 24.01 247 261 37 100.5 23.08 232 245 40 99.5 24.04 235 247,[,. 44 99.9 23.10 234 245 47 101.6 23.10 230 245 52 96.3 23.03 236 249 58 99.7 24.01 236 247 50 101.1 23.08 237 247 53 100.0 23.10 235 244 54 99.8 24.04 254 256 56 100.6 23.10

Run Time 60.0 min Vlllst

Vm

DP (H20)

Tm

Ts 1.050 m

3.15 mm

21.3 °C.

136.4 °C 37.087 ft

0.12 in

70.3 °F

277.6 °F Vw•to %HzO

Qsd

Qsw 1.068 dscm

0.101 sere (meas.)

613 dscmm[ 21,631 37 70••_•• dscfm •

Max

DH (H20)

Vs %ISO Vac. 35.137 mm

7.16 mls 3 1.383 ill 101.0 23.49 ft/s Qa Y-check 670 scmm

927 acmm

n nOlo 23,666 scfm

32,735 acfm

Test Te•am/Leader

•signature/date)Location:

General Shale Roanoke, Virginia Date: 02/23/05 Start Time:

3:40 PM End Time:

4:46 PM STACK DATA (EST)

EQUIPMENT % Moisture:

8.6 % est. Barometric: 30.21 in Hg Static Press: 0.11 in H20 Stack Press: 30.22 in Hg %CO2: 3.4 % %02: 16.6 % %N2/C0: 80.0 % Md: 29.21 lb/lb-mole

Diameter Ms: 28.24 Ib/lb-mole

Stack Area Sample Time Dry Gas Meter Pitot
'• (minutes) DP
• Reading (ft 3) Begin End

(in. H20 A1 0.0 5.0 1027.842

0.12 2 5.0 10.0 1030.850

0.13 3 10.0 15.0 1033.993

0.12 4 15.0 20.0

1037.030

0.11 5 20.0 25.0

1039.952

0.10 6 25.0 30.0

1042.684

0.11 B1 30.0 35.0

1045.640

0.12 2 35.0 40.0

1048.724

0.I1 3 40.0 45.0

1051.650

0.12 4 45.0 50.0

1054.722

0.12 5 50.0 55.0

1057.763

0.12 6 55.0 60.0

1060.800

0.10 60.0 1063.587 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Final DGM:

1063.587METER

BOX: 1376 Y: 1.008 DH@: 1.968 in H20 PITOT ID: P-11 Cp: 0.84 Source Kiln Scrubber

Run 2 Project No.

2005-0077

NOZZLE ID: G-07 Dn: 0.350 in STACK DATA (EST)
Est. Tm: 70 °F Est. Ts: 278 °F Est. dP: 0.12 in H20 Est. Dn: 0.386 inches LEAK CHECKSE.

Roberts Alley & Associates,

Inc. Method 5/26A Isokinetic

Data

Pre Mid Leak Rate 0.000 N/A 65.3 in Pump Vacuum

5 N/A 23.22 ft

Pitot Tube P N/A Gas Temperatures

(°F) Orifice Press. Pump DGM DH (in H20) Vac. Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (inHg) 72 72 278 1.31 1.31 2 73 73 279 1.42 1.42 2 75 73 280 1.32 1.32 2 75 74 281 1.21 1.21 2 75 72 280 1.10 1.10 2 73 71 280 1.20 1.20 2 72 72 277 1.32 1.32 3 72 72 280 1.20 1.20 3 73 72 280 1.31 1.31 3 73 71 281 1.31 1.31 3 74 71 281 1.31 1.31 3 74 71 280 1.09 1.09 2

MOISTURE

DATA Liquid Vol. (ml) 61 Post0.000 cfm 3 in Hg

Silica Gel (mg) P P/F

5.4 Gas Temps

K FACTOR

10.910 (°F) Imp. % ISO Vs Probe Filter Exit

(fps) 261 259 44 99.6 23.13 258 252 40 99.9 24.09 259 252 44 100.3 23.16 258 250 46 100.7 22.19 259 250 48 98.9 21.15 259 250 50 102.3 22.18 258 250 51 102.0 23.12 256 250 51 101.3 22.18 259 250 50 101.7 23.16 258 260 50 100.9 23.18 260 250 51 100.6 23.18 254 250 51 101.0 21.15

Vm DP (H20)

Tm Run Time

1.012 m

2.92 mm

22.6 °C 60.0 min 35.745 ft

0.11 in

72.7 °F Vms,d Vws

%H20

Qsd.__•___ 1.024dscm 0.089scm

•

591dscmmJ 3• •.••- 20,879 dscfm .[
T••gnatm'e/d ate) Ts

Max

DH(H20) Vs 137.6 °C Vac. 31.962mm 6.89m/s 279.8 °F

3 1.258 in 100.3 22.60ft/s Qsw Qa

Y-check 0.8% 643 scmm

892 acmmLLILocation:

General Shale Roanoke,

Virginia Date: 02/23/05 Start Time:

5:10 PM End Time:

6:13 PM

Source Kiln Scrubber

Run 3 Project No.

2005-0077 STACK DATA (EST) % Moisture:

8 % est. Barometric: 30.21 in Hg Static Press: 0.11 in H20 Stack Press: 30.22 inHg %CO2: 3.4 % %O2: 16.6 % %N2/CO: 80.0 % Md: 29.21 lb/Ib-mole Ms: 28.31 Ib/lb-mole Sample Time [Dry Gas Meter '• (minutes)
•

Reading (ft 3) Begin End A1 0.0 5.0 1063.718 2 5.0 10.0 1066.750 3 10.0 15.0 1069.920 4 15.0 20.0

I073.085 5 20.0 25.0

1076.152 6 25.0 30.0

1079.096 B1 30.0 35.0

1082.268 2 35.0 40.0

1085.312 3 40.0 45.0

1088.484 4 45.0 50.0

1091.647 5 50.0 55.0

1094.723 6 55.0 60.0

1097.552 60.0 1100.326 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0Final DGM:

1100.326

EQUIPMENT METER BOX: 1376 Y: 1.008 DH@: 1.968 inH20 PITOT ID: P-11 Cp: 0.84 NOZZLE ID: G-07 Dn: 0.350 in Diameter: 65.3 in StackArea 23.22 ft PRO; STACK DATA (EST)
Est. Tin: 73 °F Est. Ts: 280 °F Est. dP: 0.11 in H20 Est. Dn: 0.392 inches

E. Roberts Alley & Associates,

Inc. Method 5/26A Isokinetic

Data

LEAK CHECKS Mid

Post N/A 0.000 cfm N/A 3 in Hg N/A P P/F

MOISTURE

DATA ere Leak Rate 0.000 Pump Vacuum

5 Pitot Tube P Gas Temperatures

(°F) Orifice Press. Liquid Vol. (ml) 55 Silica Gel (mg) 18.4 Pump Gas Temps

K FACTOR=

11.045 DP DGM

DH (in Hz0) (in. HzO• Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual 0.12 70 70 278 1.32 1.32 0.13 71 70 279 1.43 1.43 0.13 72 70 280 1.43 1.43 0.12 73 70 280 1.32 1.32 0.11 73 70 281 1.21 1.21 0.13 74 70 280 1.44 1.44 0.12 70 70 278 1.32 1.32 0.13 73 70 279 1.44 1.44 0.13 74 70 279 1.44 1.44 0.12 74 71 280 1.33 1.33 0.10 74 71 280 1.!l 1.11 0.10 74 71 279 1.11 1.11 Vac.

(°F)

Imp. % ISO Vs (in Hg) Probe Filter Exit

(fps) 3 255 249 52 100.2 23.10 3 257 250 45 100.6 24.06 3 258 254 44 100.5 24.08 3 257 259 44 101.2 23.14 3 260 255 46 101.5 22.17 3 254 255 45 100.5 24.08 3 257 253 43 100.6 23.10 3 259 253 42 100.5 24.06 3 257 255 42 100.1 24.06 3 255 251 43 101.3 23.14 3 256 249 43 102.0 21.12 3 261 251 41 100.0 21.11

Vm DP (H20)

Tm

Ts Run Time

1.037 m

3.04 mm

21.9 °C

137.5 °C 60.0 min 36.608 ft 3 0.12 m

71.5 °F

279.4 °F VWstd %H20 0,098 scm (meas.)

602 dscmm _3.4•SS•sef o•,•. 8.5

21,246 dscfm Max

DH (H20)

%ISO Vac. 33.655mm 3 1.325 in 101.3 Qs•v Qa 657 scmm

912 acmm 23,219 scfm

32,196 acfm

Ws 7.04 m/s 23.11 ft/s Y-check 0.8%

Test•Tea• Leader \-/(signature/date)GENERAL SHALE BOILER RUN t

DATE: 2/24/2005 ERA&A Analyzers Time 02 CO2 NOX SO2
8:07:00 16.2

3.8 75.3 70.2 8:08:00 16.3

3.7 78.3 69.5 8:09:00 16.2

3.8 74.9 69.6 8:10:00 16.2

3.8 76.8 70.0 8:11:00 16.4

3.7 81.5 68.8 8:12:00 16.2

3.8 75.4 68.1 8:13:00 16.3

3.7 72.3 68.7 8:14:00 16.4

3.6 69.2 66.4 8:15:00 15.9

4.0 69.4 68.1 8:16:00 16.3

3.7 82.8 69.0 8:17:00 16.3

3.7 82.2 67.0 8:18:00 16.1

3.8 66.6 68.9 8:19:00 16.8

3.4 64.6 65.0 8:20:00 16.6

3.5 65.0 62.5 8:21:00 15.8

4.1 66.2 67,3 8:22:00 16.1

3.9 76.4 70.4 8:23:00 16.3

3.8 81.7 67.9 8:24:00 16.0

3.9 70.4 68.3 8:25:00 16.4

3.7 59,6 69.1 8:26:00 16.4

3.7 64.7 64.4 8:27:00 15.8

4.1 67.9 68.6 8:28:00 16.1

3.9 73.6 72.0 8:29:00 16.3

3.8 81.4 69.6 8:30:00 16.0

3.9 73.9 69.0 8:31:00 16.5

3.7 66.1 69.7 8:32:00 16.2

3.9 76.1 66.5 8:33:00 16.0

4.0 74.5 69.0 8:34:00 16.0

4.0 74.3 71.8 8:35:00 16.4

3.8 83.5 70.2 8:36:00 16.1

3.9 78.3 68.7 8:37:00 16.0

4.0 74.3 70.7 8:38:00 16.4

3.7 81.8 70.1 8:39:00 16.2

3.8 75.9 68.7 8:40:00 16.0

3.9 70.3 70.7 8:41:00 16.4

3.7 80,6 69.7 8:42:00 16.3

3.8 78.0 67.1 8:43:00 16.4

3.8 65.2 68.4 8:44:00 16.4

3.6 79.6 62.8 8:45:00 16.3

3.8 77.6 66,5 8:46:00 16.0

4.0 69.3 69.0 8:47:00 16.3

3.8 79,8 69.6 8:48:00 16.3

3.8 80.8 67.4 8:49:00 15.9

4.0 71.3 68.9 8:50:00 16.3

3.9 79.9 70,0 8:51:00 16.3

3.8 81.2 68.4 8:52:00 15.9

4.1 71.9 70.2 8:53:00 16.2

3,9 81.5 71.0 8:54:00 16.3

3.9 84.8 68.9 8:55:00 15.9

4.0 74.7 69.9 8:56:00 16.2

3.9 79.6 70.9 8:57:00 16.4

3.8 82.8 68,3 8:58:00 16.0

4.0 73.5 68.5 8:59:00 16.2

3.9 77.9 69.6 9:00:00 16.4

3.8 83.4 67.0 9:01:00 16.0

3.9 74.9 67.0 9:02:00 16.2

3.9 78.0 68.6 9:03:00 16.4

3.7 83.3 66.7 9:04:00 16.1

3.9 75.0 66.7 9:05:00 16.2

3,9 76.6 69.0 9:06:00 16.4

3.7 83.4 67.1

Uncorrected

Average
02CO2NOXSO2 16.23,875.568.5

%%ppmvdppmvd
Corrected Average
02CO2NOXS02 16.33.675.468.7

%%ppmvdppmvd

1-1GENERAL SHALE BOILER RUN 2

DATE: 2/24/2005 ERA&A Analyzers Time 02 CO2 NOX SO2
9:49:00 16.2

3.9 75.2 70.8 9:50:00 16.2

4.0 76.4 72.8 9:51:00 16.2

3.9 77.1 74.1 9:52:00 16.2

3.9 77.0 75.3 9:53:00 16.2

3.9 77.2 71,7 9:54:00 I6.2

4.0 77,3 72.3 9:55:00 16.4

3.9 80.8 72.0 9:56:00 16,2

3.9 78.0 70,9 9:57:00 16.2

4.0 76.8 72.0 9:58:00 16.3

3.9 80.1 72,6 9:59:00 16.3

3.9 77.5 71,6 10:00:00 16.2

3.9 76.8 72.4 10:01:00 16.3

3.9 80.5 72.3 10:02:00 16.3

3.8 79.5 70.7 10:03:00 16,2

3.9 77.2 71.2 10:04:00 16.3

3.8 79.9 71.0 10:05:00 16.3

3.8 80.2 70.2 t0:06:00 16.5

3.7 67.6 70.1 10:07:00 16.1

3.9 67.7 70.2 10:08:00 16.4

3.9 82.9 71.1 10:09:00 16.4

3.8 83.1 70.0 10:10:00 16.5

3.7 63.8 69.9 10:11:00 16.7

3.5 64.3 66.5 10:12:00 16.4

3.8 71.0 65.7 10:13:00 15.9

4.1 69.5 70.9 10;14:00 16.3

3,9 78.2 72,3 10:15:00 16.4

3.8 82.7 69.5 10:16:00 16.0

4.0 72.1 69.8 10:17:00 16.8

3.5 58.3 70,2 10:18:00 16.2

3.9 64.5 64,9 10:19:00 15.9

4.1 70.9 71.4 10:20:00 16.1

4.0 77.5 73,9 10:21:00 17.1

3.3 71.9 60.7 10:22:00 16.1

4.0 74.9 70,4 10:23:00 16,1

4.0 77.0 73.4 10:24:00 16.5

3.8 85,3 71,1 10:25:00 16.2

3.9 76.2 70.4 10:26:00 16.2

4.0 76.0 73.5 10:27:00 16.5

3.7 84.5 71.3 10:28:00 16.3

3.9 79.2 70.2 10:29:00 16.2

3.9 75.4 72.8 10:30:00 16.6

3.7 83.1 70.7 10:31:00 16.4

3.8 78.8 68.5 10:32:00 16.2

3•9 73.7 70.8 10:33:00 16.6

3.7 83.6 69.5 10:34:00 16.5

3.7 80,0 67,4 10:35:00 16.2

3.9 71.9 69.3 10:36:00 16.6

3.7 81,2 68.4 10:37:00 16.5

3.7 78.9 66.5 10:38:00 16.2

3.9 70.8 68.5 10:39:00 16.6

3.7 81.2 68.6 10:40:00 16.5

3.7 80.9 66.7 10:41:00 16.1

4.0 70.5 68.3 10:42:00 16,5

3.8 81.1 69.0 10:43:00 16.5

3.8 81.3 66,9 10:44:00 16.0

4,0 71.6 69.1 10:45:00 16.4

3,9 82.8 70.5 10:46:00 16.5

3.8 85.0 68.5 10:47:00 16,0

4.1 73.5 69.5

Uncorrected

Average
02 16.3

% CO2 3,9

% NOX 76.5

ppmvd SO2 70.2

ppmvd
Corrected Average
02 16.3

% CO2 3.7

% NOX 76.4

ppmvd SO2 70.2

ppmvd

1-1GENERAL SHALE BOILER RUN 3

DATE: 2/24/2005 ERA&A Analyzers Time 02 CO2 NOX SO2
11:22:00 16.5

3.9 83.0 69.9 11:23:00 16.1

4.1 72.4 69.9 11:24:00 16.3

4.0 77.1 71.4 11:25:00 16.5

3.8 81.8 68.8 11:26:00 16.1

4.1 72,7 68.8 11:27:00 16.3

4.0 76.6 71.0 11:28:00 16.5

3.9 83.3 69.0 11:29:00 16.2

4.0 73.6 68.8 11:30:00 16.2

4.1 74.5 71.4 11:31:00 16.5

3.9 82.0 69.5 11:32:00 16.2

4.0 74.8 68.8 11:33:00 16.2

4.I 75.0 72.2 11:34:00 16.5

3.9 85.3 70,7 11:35:00 16.2

4.0 77.8 69.9 11:36:00 16.1

4.1 75.4 73.1 11:37:00 16,5

3.9 84.2 71.5 11:38:00 16.3

4.0 78.8 69.9 11:39:00 16.1

4.1 73.9 72.2 11:40:00 16.5

3.9 84.4 70.8 11:41:00 16.3

3.9 80.1 68.8 11:42:00 16.1

4.1 72.1 70,8 11:43:00 16.5

3.9 81.6 70.2 11:44:00 16.4

3.9 79.2 68.6 11:45:00 16.0

4.1 70.3 70.5 11:46:00 16.5

3.9 81.2 70.5 11:47:00 16.4

3.9 80.0 68.2 11:48:00 16.1

4.1 69.7 69.9 11:49:00 16.4

3.9 79.9 70.1 11:50:00 16.5

3.9 81.0 67.9 11:51:00 16,0

4.1 70.6 69.4 11:52:00 16.4

3.9 81,4 70,2 11:53:00 16.5

3.9 83.0 68.2 11:54:00 16,2

4.0 67.3 69.5 11:55:00 16.4

3.9 67.5 69,4 11:56:00 16.3

4.0 77.1 68.8 11:57:00 16.4

4.0 73.1 69.1 11;58:00 17.0

3.4 63.6 60.6 11:59:00 16,6

3,7 61.9 63.3 12;00:00 16.2

4.1 72.0 65.2 I2:01:00 16.1

4.1 72.8 69.2 12;02:00 16.1

4.1 75.0 70.2 12:03:00 16.3

4.0 80.8 69.2 12:04:00 16,2

4.1 73.5 69.4 12:05:00 16.7

3.7 59.6 67.4 12:06:00 16.3

4.0 61.9 65.7 12:07:00 15.9

4.2 68.7 69.8 12:08:00 16.1

4.1 73.4 71.2 12:09:00 16.3

4.0 80.7 70.2 12:10:00 16.1

4,1 75.6 70.2 12:11:00 16.1

4.1 75.7 72.5 12:12:00 16.4

4.0 82.9 71.8 12:13:00 16.2

4.1 77.0 70.7 12:14:00 16.1

4.1 74.9 71.6 12:15:00 16.4

4.0 81.8 71.1 12:16:00 16.3

4.0 77.1 69.5 12:17:00 16.1

4.1 74.9 70.5 12:18:00 16,4

3.9 79.6 69.9 12:19:00 16.4

3.9 76,0 67.9 12:20:00 16.2

4.0 73.0 68.7 12:21:00 t6.5

3.9 78.9 68.6

Uncorrected

Average
02 16.3

% CQ2 4,0

% NOX 75.9

ppmvd SO2 69.5

ppmvd
Corrected Average
02 16.3

% CO2 3.8

% NOX 75.9

ppmvd SO2 69.4

ppmvd

1-1Location:

General Shale Roanoke,

VA Date: 02/24/05 ESTIMATED STACK DATA

EQUIPMENT % Moisture:

8.0 % est. 1376 Barometric: 30.05 in Hg Static Press: 0.10 in H20 Stack Press: 30.06 in Hg %CO2: 3.6 % %02: 16.3 % %N2/CO: 80.t % Md: 29.23 Ib/Ib-mole MW: 28.33 Ib/]b-rnole
DWELL Time (min)
5.125.31 102.528 5.12 104.595 5.12 106.502 5.12 108.492 5.12 110.500 5.5O 112.501 114.640 116.575 118.473 120.602 122.512 124.625 5.31 METER BOX:Y: 1.008 AH@: 1.968 in H20 Cp': 0.84 SIN 20174 Cp: 0.84 SIN 20174 Nozzle Dia: Stack Area: # of Points: Total Run Time: Dry Gas Pitot Meter AP Reading (ft 3) ("H201 100.499 0.1300.1400,1300.1300.1300.1300.1500.1400.1300.1300.1300.140 5.125.125.125.31

Start Time: End Time:

0.264 inches 23.22 • 12 points 60 min Gas Temperatures

(°F', DGMln!et...i outlet Stack

8:07 AM

RUN No.

t 9:12 AM

JOE] No. 2005-0077 ESTIMATED DATA

•

PMo•I 0 Mass Ts(°F)••mm •: 70 •11 Particulate

Catches

m----• E• 0.61t cfm •• Filterable

Filter/P&N

26 Est. •: • mpoise•

Organic

Imp MeCI2

0.0 Est. AH: 0.574 ("H20) •_ inorganic LEAK CHECKS FINAL CATCH DGM initial 100.4•6

N/•- Liquid Vol. (ml) DGM final 100.458

N/A Leak Rate 0.002 N/A Vacuum 10 N/A Orifice Press. Pump AH (in H20) Vac. ideal Actual (in 0,575 1.0 0,575 1.0 0.575 2.0 0.575 2.0 0.575 2.0 0.575 2.0 0.575 2.0 0.575 2.0 0.575 2.0 0.575 2.0 0.575 3.0 0.575 3.0 0.5740.5740,5740.5740.574i0.574i 0.5740.5740.5740.5740.5741 0.574 124.688 cf t24.688 cf 0 cfm 3 in. Hg Gas Temps (°F) Imp 43,3 Y-check -3.2%
Qs Dso(,m: (acfm}0.615 9.96 0.6051 10.11 0.579 10.46 0.604 10.15 0.6121 10.08 0.604 10.12 0.601 10.12 0.558 10.64 0.571 10.52 0.842 9.71 0.578 10.49 0.616 10.02

Run Time 62.4 min Vmstd 0.6944 dscm 24,521 dscf

Vm

AP (H20)

Tm

Ts 0.683 m t39.6 °C 24.126 ft 3 283.3 °F Vw,ta Filterable

PM-10 0.0577 scm 0.0169

gr/dscf 2.038 scf 3.26

Ibslhr 3.408 mm

19,3 °C 0.134 in

66.7 °F %H20 Qsd (stack) I(,•eas.)1638.23 dscmm 7.•7 22,538 dscf•m Max

AN (H20) Vac. 14.805 mm 3.0 0.575 in Organic Condens Ms 7ol,.•U 7.484 mls 106.5 24.553 ft/s inorganic Condens 0.0000 grldscf

0.0000

grldscf 0.00 Ibs/hr

0.00

Ibs/hr Final DGM:

124,625

63.0! 63.0 280 64.01 64.0 283 66.01 66.0 285 67.0 66.0 288 66.0 65.0 287 68.0 66.0 282 66.0 64.0 280 68.0 68.0 277 68.0 68.0 282 69.0 69.0 285 69.01 69.0 287 69.0 69.0 286

Qs (acfrn):

0.597

D50 (p,m): Probe Filter Exit 250 254 32 256 255 26 254 249 28 256 258 28 257 259 28 260 258 28 257 257 27 260 259 28 257 257 29 255 258 31 257 254 31 258 253 31

10.2Date: 02/24/05 STACK DATA Location: General Shale Roanoke,

VA

% Moisture:

7.7 % est. Barometric: 30.05 in Hg Static Press: 0.10 in H20 Stack Press: 30.06 in Hg %CO2: 3.6 % %02: t6.3 % %N2/CO: 80.1 % Md: 29.23 Ib/lb-mole Start Time:

9:49 AM End Time:

10:51 AM EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED

DATA METER BOX:

1376 Y: t.008 •H@: 1.968 in H20 Cp': 0.84 SIN 20174 Cp: 0.84 SIN 20174 Nozzle Dia: 0,264 inches Stack Area: 23.22 ft # of Points:

12 .p°ints Mw: 28.36 Ib/Ib-mole Total Run Time: 60 rnin DWELL Tirne RUN No.

2 JOB No. 2005-0077

Dry Gas Ts(°F): 283 Tm (°F): 67 Est. Qs: 0.615 cfrn Est. •: 225.78 mpoise Est./•H: 0.576 ("H20) rEAK CHECKS DGM initial 124.715

N/A 147.447 cf DGM final 124.716

N/A 147.447 cf Leak Rate 0.00' N/A

0 cfm Vacuum 5 N/A

5 in. Hg Pitot Gas Temperatures

(°F) Orifice Press, Purnp

Gas TernpsPM-'i0

Mass Particulate Catches

m====2=g Filterable Filter/P&N

19,7 Organic Imp MeCI2

0.0 Inorganic Imp Water

0.0 FINAL CATCH Liquid Vol. (rnl) 41.2 Y-check -0.3%

A/123456B/123456 (rnin)

Meter

•p

DGM

z•H (in H20) Vac.

(°F)

Imp. Qs Reading (ft 3) ("H20) Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) Probe Filter Exit (acfm) 4.92 124,653 4.75 126.714 4.75 128.554 4.58 130.482 4.75 132,307 4.75 134.190 4.75 136.084 4.75 137.970 4.75 139.858 4.58 141.738 4.58 143.558 4.40 145.365 147.125 Ds0
0,150 "'68.0 69.0 277 0,576 0.576 3.0 258 256 26 0,639 9.67 0,140 68.0 69.0 277 0.576 0.576 3.0 256 252 30 0.59" 10.22 0.140 69.0 69.0 282 0.576 0.576 3.0 258 254 31 0.622 9.90 0,130 69.0 69.0 283 0,576 0.576 3.0 256 252 31 0.612 10.03 0.140 69.0 69.0 285 0,576 0,576 3.0 255 250 31 0.610 10.07 0.140 68.0 68.0 285 0,576 0,576 3.0 247 253 29 0.615 10.02 0.140 69.0 69.0 283 0.576 0.576 3.0 255 257 28 0.610 10.06 0,140 69.0 69.0 276 0.576 0.576 3.0 253 253 29 0.605 10.04 0,140 69.0 69.0 281 0.576 0.576 3.0 260 258 28 0.606 10.08 0.130 70.0 69.0 283 0,576 0.576

3.0 257 264 29 0.610 10.06 0.130 70.0 69.0 283 0.576 0,576 3.0 256 254 29 0,605 10.11 0.120 70.0 69.0 279 0.576 0,576 3.0 257 257 30 0,610 10.01

0.0000 ,gddscf

0.0000

gr/dscf 0.00 Ibs/hr

0.00

Ibs/hr 147,125 "=• Final DGM:

Vrn

/•P (H•O)

Tm Run Tirne 0.636 rn 3 3.471 mrn

20.5 °C 56.3 rnin 22.47t ft 3 0,137 in

69.0 °F Vmstd VWstd

%H•O Qsd (stack) 0.6439 dscm 0.0549 scm (meas.) 643,82 dscrnm 22.740 dscf 1.939 scf

7.9 22,735 dscfrn

0.0133

gddscf 2.60 Ibsfhr Qs (acfm):

0.6t 3 £)50 (•m):

1 0.0 Ts Max

/•H (H•O)

Vs %1SO 138.4 °C

Vac. 14.630 rnnrn

7.542 rnls 281.2 °F

3.0 0.576 in 108.5 24.744 ft/s Fiiterable PM-10

Organic Condens

Inorganic

Condens@Location:

General Shale Roanoke,

VA Date: 02124105 ESTIMATED STACK DATA % Moisture:

7.9 % est, Barometric: 30.05 in Hg Static Press: 0.10 in H20 Stack Press: 30.06 in Hg %CO2: 3.6 %

3456B/1234 5 EQUIPMENT METER BOX:

t376 Y: 1.008 /•H@: 1.968 in Cp': 0.84 SIN 20174 Cp: 0.84 SIN 20174! %02: 16.3 %

Nozzle Dia: %N2/CO: 80.1 %

StackArea: Md: 29.23 Ib/Ib-mole

• of Points: Mw: 28.34 Ib/Ib-mole Total Run Time: Dry Gas Pitot DWELL Time

Meter (rain) Start Time:

t 1:22 AM End Time:

12:24 PM ESTIMATED DATA

RUN No.

3 JOB No. 2005-0077

Ts (°F): 28t Tm (°F): 69 Est. Qs: 0.613 cfm

Filte•able Est. •: 225.08 mpoise

Organic Est. •H: 0,575 ("H20)

Inorganic

Reading (ft 3) LEAK CHECKS 0.264 inches

DGM initial 147.447

N/A 23.22 •"•====•

DGM final 147.447

N/A 12 points

Leak Rate 0 N/A 60 min

Vacuum

5 N/A •;as Temperatures

(°F) Orifice Press. Pump DGM /kH (in H20) Vac.

PM-'i 0 Mass Particulate Catches

171.868 cf

0 cfm 3 in. Hg Gas Temps (°F) mg Filter/P&N 27.0 Imp MeCI2

0.0 Imp Water

0.0 FINAL CATCH

5,24 147.490 5,05 149.566 5.055.245.055.055.245.245.055.055.05 151.553 153.518 155.595 157.581 159,553 161.665 163,760 165.764 167.738 5.24 169,755 171.848

Final DGM:

171,848

6'1.6 rain 124.358 •3 Vmstd VWstd 0.6982 dscm 0.0603 scm 24,657 dscf 2,128 scf ("H20) Inlet Outlet Stack Ideal Actual (in Hg) Probe 0,140 69.0 •9.0 278 0.575 0.575

2.0 254 0.130 67,0 68.0 278 0.575 0.575

2.0 256 0.130 67.0 68.0 278 0.575 0,575

2.0 255 0.140 69.0 69.0 282 0.575 0.575

2.0 256 0.130 69.0 69.0 285 0.575 0,575

2.0 254 0,130 69.0 69.0 284 0.575 0.575

2.0 258 0.140 68.0 68.0 285 0,575 0,575

2.0 255 0.140 68.0 68.0 272 0.575 0.575

2.0 254 0.130 70.0 69,0 279 0,575 0.575

2.0 256 0,130 70.0 70.0 282 0.575 0.575

3.0 257 0.130 70.0 70.0 282 0.575 0.575

3.0 251 0.140 69.0 69.0 281 0.575 0.575

3.0 257

Vm •,P (H20)

Tm Run Time 0,690 m Liquid Vol. (ml) 45.2 Y-check -1.0%

Qs (acfrn):

0.608
Ts Max

z•H (H20) 138.1 °C

Vac. 14.605 mm 280.5 °F

2.0 0.575 in 3.408 mm

20.4 °C 0.134 in

68.8 °F %H20 Qsd stack) (meas.) 637.68 dscmm J•__J22,518 dscfm L 7.470 m/s 108.7 24,509 ft/s Inorganic Condens Filterable PM-10

Organic Condens 0.0169 gr/dscf

0.0000

gr/dscf

0.000(•,

gr/dscf 3.25 Ibs/hr

0.00

Ibs/hr

0.00

Ibs/hr [•50 (l•m):

i 0.iVs 255 34 0.606 10.05 253 34 0.603 10.08 252 33 0.596 10.16 251 33 0.609 10,05 253 31 0.607 10.11 253 31 0.602 10.16 254 31 0.623 9.92 255 31 0.607 9.96 257 32 0.607 10.05 255 34 0.600 10.16 255 34 0.613 10.01 256 34 0.613 10.00 Filter Exit (acfm) Imp. Qs Ds0 (t•m)CYCLONIC FLOW

DATA

CL ENT e•:•#Qt

5•:I/•

SOURCE

I,•'l •CFU/•"

PROJECT

N O DATE i•/•3 015

ALLEY PERSONNEL

•E •O.,. b,).•"

,::: DUCT DIMENSION AREA-•:•'i 2 PITOT ID # 72"0"?

AVG COEFFC.ENT'

•"•';•

BAR.. PRESSURE
SAMPLE IRUN# RUN# POINT ANGLE¢

•P

A•GLE¢

i' AP

r AN.GL.E(•

AP

 ̧25

3O

Cyclonic Flow E. Robel•ts Alley, & Assoc atesDraw North Arrow

Observer's Nam• Qbserve.r's Certified by
Date: . 5,70 28• 58 o 29 59 C) A si× minute occurred 0 i Six minute

average

greater

than 40% opacity• occu•tred o times. 1.3 Th The highe.•-

six b.,•iru;fe

average

was •._ .%.Visible EmisSi0n•

Observation"Report.

140 S

0bserver% Na .m. ! (print) 0bserve•'s Signa[Ure: C.ertified by (a•eflcy)• L•ture •z•mtion

Date:

•!_,:[zL/• Fbtd EX,•n

Date:

•__•_•_/• 00

00

!. I 30 0 0 0

O

9 @ o o O .39 ("• }0•O

O •0 o •, • ,d 4o O..{o•O

,. , ,..

• •.. -,•,,J

•3 o o o,, o 43 O 14 O Q O O

44

I ,•--

20 o o o o

O

24 0 O O O 54 O •O•O

260 0 0 O 06 27 0 0 0 0t57 28 0 58
o A six minute

average

greater

than •city occurred O• times, A six •]inute average

greater

•han #•aoity occuned O time•.stack Draw North

...... Arrow

0bserver% Nam• Observer's Signature: 910

O O: O 39! O. O. 0 d.i 40• 1"t O O O

41 12 • G O.O.

42 t3 o"•'o

o 4•

A s!i • minute average

greater

than •.•city occurred .O. time•.
A •,•, m nute average

greater

than occMrred ©._ times.EPA Method

5 Particulate

Determination

Data Analysis Company • Shale Project #•- Test Date •/23 -.24(0_5 # sam_ _sF

Fo AnalystlSLJModell•PX

200 Serial #•59 Certification[2/5/2004

Sample ID

Analysis

of Particulate

Recovery

PM Run 01

PM Run 02

PM Run 03
Filter ID 851 Filter tare (g) 0.3692

Dates Final •¢. (g) 1st 0,4265

3/1/2005 Final wt. (g) 2rid 0.4262

3/1/2005 Net filter catch (mg)

57.2 8620.3709 0.4205 0.4203

Dates 3/1/2005 3/1/2005 49.5
PM2

8630.3669 0.4298 0.429662.8

Dates 3/1/2005 3/1/2005

Beaker number Beaker tare (g) Final wt. (g) st Final wt. (g) 2nd Acetone blank (g) Acetone vol. (mL) Net front rinse (mg)
Total particulate

(mg)]

PM13.7711

Dates 3.7862 3/1/2005 3.7864 3/1/2005 07515,2

3.7665 3.7805 3.7809
7514.2
72.3 63.7

Dates 3/1/2005 3/1/2005

PM33.8102 3.8534 3.8531.8043.1
105.9

Dates 3/i/2005 3/1/2005

Sample ID

Analysis

of Particulate

Recovery

PM 10 Run 01

PM 10 Run 02

PM 10 Run 03
Filter ID Filter tare (g) Final wt. (g) st Final wt, (g) 2nd Net filter catch (rag)
Beaker number Beaker tare (g) Final vet, (g) 1 st Final wt. (g) 2nd Acetone blank (g) Acetone vol. 0nL) Net front rinse (rng)

8820.1315 0.1547 0.154523.1
10-13.8315

Dates 3/1/2005 3/1/2005

8790.1242 0.1412 0.141016.9

Dates 3/1/2005 3/1/2005

8810.1219 0.1470 0.146725.0

Dates 3/1/2005 3/1/2005

3.8353 3.8353
803.8 Dates 3/1/2005 3/1/2005

10-23.7917 3.7944 3.79450752.8

Dates 3/1/2005 1/3/1900

10-33.7644 3.76643.7666
802.1

Dates 3/1/2005 1/3/1900

Total particulate

(rag)

26.9 19.7 [ 27.0CLIENT INFORMATION LABORATORY

INFOI:L•IAT[ON Attention; Jeremy Hutehens Contact: Client Name:

E. Roberts Alley & As•oc

Project: Project: 2005-0077 Date Received: Project Dese; (•[ •h•l• ••-

Date Reported:

Mike Challis, g,Sc, C.Chem. AN050181 0 l-Mar-2005 10-Mar-2005 Address: 1931 Central Parkway SW, Suite BDecatur, AL 35601 Fax Number:

256 351-0151 Phone Number:

256 351-012 Submission

No.: 5C0-I32 Sample No.:

009643-009646

NOTES: "=" not at•alysed "<' less thet• Method D•b•ction Lbtdt (MDL) 'NA no data available LOQ can by determined fOr all analytes b), m•l•plylng

the appropriate

MDL X 3,33 SolM• dat• •s based on d• weight except for b•ta Chaises, Organi¢ analyses are not ¢or•ed for •raction reoove• standards •¢¢Tt for isotope dilu•on methods) (£¢. CA• 429 PA• all PCDD/F and DB•DBF analyses) The encased cop), of the C*haln of Custodj• Re•rd may contain Information

a•xsary for the in•rp•dan of the datm Methods used by PSC Analytical

Services are based upon those found in 'Standard Methods for the Examination

of Water and Wastewateg,

Twentieth Edition, Other methods arc based on the principles of MISA or EPA methodologies, New York State; ELAP Identification

Number 10756,
All work recorded herein has been done in accordance

with nom•al professional

standards using accepted testing methodologies, quality assurance and quality control procedures

except where otherwise agreezt to by the client and testing company in writing, Any and all use of these test results shall be limited to •he actual co•t of the pertinent analysis done. There is no other warranty expressed or implied. Your samples wilt be retained at PSC Analytical

Services for a period of three weeks from •ceipt of data or a• per contact,

CONlVlENTS: (1) Matrix interference

suspected

Page of 4

5555 NORTH SERVICE ROAD. BURLtNGTt'3i',I

f3NIYttm• C'•.lxl•.r",^ •7• •u'•"3/lo/2oo3 Summary

of AnaiyMs

Pro. Dates •age MS-4 of 4
Batch Code: Impknger volume measured

Date Analysed: Date Prepared:
Batch Code: Adjusted impinger volume

Date Analysed: Date Prepared:
Batch Code: Impinger Charge Volume

Date Analysed: Date Prepared:
Batch Code: Hydrogen Fluoride

M26A

Date Analysed: Date Prepared: 0307ASA1 009644 05 0096•5 05 009646 05 05/03/07 05/03/07
0307ASA1 009644 05 009645 05 009646 05 05/03•7 05/03•7
0307ASAI 009644 05 009645 05 009646 05 05/03/07 O5/03/07
0307ASA4 009643 05 009644 05 009645 O5 009646 05 05/03/07 05/03/07

Submission No: 5C0132 Client: E. Robcrtz Alley Assoc Project: 2005-,0077mmm OAppendix D •_•NITROGEN OXIDE

EPA METHOD

7E
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS

CALIBRATION

DATA

Date 2-//C'•/c

T Operator Concentration Range Response

Time Calibration Accuracy

(Accuracy

± 2% of calibration

gas value)

"Z- o ppm

Gas Cylinder

Actual Type No. Concentration

ZERO •'

HIGH

AnalyzerJ

Gas

Cylinder

Actual

Analyzer

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM

BIAS

GASTYPE INITIAL RESPONSE

FINAL RESPONSE
ZERO 55 .o

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO (•, ?

O. /5T.o

(Accuracy

± 5% of span)

(, "5 ppm (Drift ± 3% of span)

3,2

ppm

GAS •ITI•

F• T•E •SPONSE

•SPONSE
ZERO O.

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO GAS

INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZEROSULFUR DIOXIDE

EPA METHOD

6C
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS

CALIBRATION

DATA

•oo Calibration Accuracy

(Accuracy

Location Operator Response

Time

± 2% of span value)

Gas Cylinder

Actual Type No. Concentration

ZERO

HIGH

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM

BIAS

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO O, /

0, 'L • 9.4

OAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE

ZERO 6, 't_

o.'3d'S.Z

:•ITI• TIME R• •

T•ME

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE P,£SPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO

lt• ,o ! Gas

Cylinder

Actual

Analyzer Type No. Concentration

(Accuracy ± 5% of span) 7.0 ppm (Drift ± 3% of span)

9.% ppm

GAS INITIM•

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO O. 9•

O. C

•ITI• TIME

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE

ZERO

:INITI• TiME

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZEROOXYGEN EPA METHOD
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSIS

CALIBRATION

DATA

Concentration Range Calibration Accm'acy

(Accuracy

Location Operator Response

Time 2% of span )

Gas Cylinder

Actual

Analyzer Type No. Concentration

ZERO • O 0 O

ZERO & SPAN SYSTEM

BIAS

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO O o

O. •

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO eo C,

O, G[o .O

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE. RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO Gas

Cylinder

Actual

Analyzer Type No.

Concentration

MID /

(Accuracy • 5% of span)

% (Drift + 3% of span)

%

,,: '::

GAS INITIAL TYPE RESPONSE
ZERO •. c,

FINAL RESPONSE

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZEROCARBON D•OX•DE

EPA METHOD

3A

Plant
Date 2_ [ a.,• •o•"
Concentration Range
Calibration AccuracytNSTRUN[ENTAL ANAL•gSIS

CALIBRATION

DATA G •.•<•t

s •..

Location

k-: Operator k Response Time (Accuracy + 2% of span)

0.5 %

Gas Cylinder

Actual

Analyzer Type No. Concentration

ZERO •et

o.o

6 •o

ZERO & SPAN SYS•M

B•S

GAS INITI•

F• TYPE •SPONSE

•SPONSE

ZERO O, 3

O. %

o .o

/o. o

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE

ZERO O. •

O. 3 rev;ol Io. 0

/o, 0
..•.•iVNE

GAS •ITI•

F• TYPE •SPONSE

•SPONSE

ZERO Gas

Cylinder

Actual

Analyzer Type No.

Concentration

MID 1,0.0

I 0 0

• ,.-• •,.,,.•.•.• •g•

(Accuraw, fi% ofsp•)

I.• % (Dfifl• 3% of span) •.$ %

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO 0.3

d. 3 •,';d 1 o. •

lo. 0 /:.... !.• :• : •:'.•.""

7 ":<

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZERO

GAS INITIAL

FINAL TYPE RESPONSE

RESPONSE
ZEROCertificate of Ar a ys s: Cylinder Number:

,SG9114991

Reference

Number: Cylinder Pressure:

1999.6 PSIG Expiration

Date: Certification Date: 10/26/2004

Laboratory: Certified Concentrations EPA Protoco

Gas Mixture
47-124024889-5 10126/2007 ASG Mobile AL Airgas Specialty Gases 5480 Hamilton 8oulevard Theodore, AL 36582 251.653.2500 Fax: 251.653.2530 vw•w.airgas.com

Component Concentration

Accuracy

Analytical Principle

Procedure CARBON DIOXIDE 19.87 %

+/- 1%

NDIR G1 OXYGEN 20.06 %

+/- 1%

PARAMAGN G1 NITROGEN Balance Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed. Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferences. DoN°tes:AirgaSnot

use cy!inderPO110747905 ,•z-•-",. be,ow 150 psig..

Approval

Signature

_.__•'•,_Z•_.L•z-...•_ • Reference Standard

h'fformation

NTRM 82659 NTRM 82745 Analytical Results st Component
st Analysis Date: 19.38 S 19.88 19.88 Z 0.000 0,000 R 19.38

Balance Gas Component

CyI.Number

Concentration NITROGEN OXYGEN

$G9163000

20.98 % NITROGEN CARBON DIOXIDE

SG9198981-

19.37 % CA•ON •io•J•:Ei

.:::

7., 2nd Component 10/26/2004 1st Analysis Date: Z 0.000

Conc 19.87 %

R 20.98

S 20.06 R 19.38 Conc 19.87 %

S 20.06

Z 0.000 S 19.88

Conc 19.87 %

Z 0.000

R 20.98 AVG: 19.87 % 0/26/2004 0.000

Conc 20.06 % 20.98 Conc 20.06 % 20.06 Conc 20.06 % AVG: 20.06 %Certificate Cylinder

No: Cylinder Pressure: Certification Date: Certified Concentrations

of Analysis

EPA

Protoco

Gas
SG9136100 2,013 psig 01/16/2004 Airgas Spe¢ialty 6ase8 5480 Har•llton Blvd. Theodore, AL 36582 (251) 653-2500 Fax: (251) 653-2530 www.•irgas,com Mi×ture
Reference Number:

47-76361900-004 Expiration Date:

01/16/2007 Laboratory: ASG- Mobile

Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed. Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferences. Notes: AIRGAS PO 110853045

AIRGAS LOT# .•,-04010+,..0.,+

Do not use cylinder below 150 psig.
Reference Standard

information

GMIS 0 Analytical Results 1st Component
1st Analysis Date: R 1,026 S S 923.0 Z Z 0.0000 R 2nd Analysis Date: R 1,026 S S 923.0 Z Z 0.0000 R Approved

for Release

01/09/2004 923.0 Z 0.0000 Conc 923.0 PPM 0.0000 R 1,026 Conc 923,0 PPM 1,026 S 923.0 Conc 923.0PPM AVG: 923,0 PPM 01/16/2004 923.0 Z 0.0000 Conc 923.0 PPM 0.0000 R 1,026 Conc 923.0PPM 1,026 S 923.0 Conc 923.0 PPM AVG: 923.0 PPM Component

Cyl. Number Concentration Sulfur Dioxide ND-15687 1,026 PPMCertificate of Analysis: Cylinder Number:

SG9162486 Cylinder Pressure:

1999.6 PSIG Certification Date: 12/27/2004 Certified Concentrations Component NITRIC OXIDE NITROGEN EPA

Protoco

Gas Mixture,
Reference Number: Expiration Date: Laboratory:

47-124027201-1 12/27/2006 ASG Mobile AL Airgas Specialty Gases 5480 Hamilton Boulevard Theodore, AL 36582 251,653.2500 Fax: 251.653.2530
www, airgas.com

Concentration Accuracy

Analytical

Principle 505.0 PPM

+/- I%

CHEMILLUM Balance Procedure GI
Total oxides or nitrogen 505.0 PPM Certification performed

in accordance

with "EPA Traceability

Protocol (Sept. 1997)" using the assay procedures

listed. Analytical Methodology

does not require correction

for analytical

interferenc.,es.

/• Notes:A rgas PO 110766997 .... / /' ...*., Do notusecyhnderbelow

,50psig.

Approval

Signature

&•4•b"•-

• •]•1'•_•,'•

/';;:'-- =•eference btandard

Information / ,.,• •

• ,Balance Gas •#•ponen•

••z

•oncentrat•on •e•
GMIS 0

NITROGEN

NITRIC OXIDE ND17876

983 PPM Analytical Results 1st Component

N•(TRIG' •iB•.
st Analysis Date: 12/17/2004 R g83.0

S 505,0

Z 0,000 S 505.0

Z 0.000

R 983.0 Z 0.000

R 983.0

S 505.0

Conc 505.0 PPM Conc 505,0 PPM Conc 505.0 PPM AVG: 505.0 PPM 2rid Analysis Date: 12/2•/2004
R 983.0

S 505.0

Z 0.000

Conc 505.0 PPM S 505,0

Z 0,000

R 983.0

Conc 505.0 PPM Z 0,000

R 983.0

S 505.0

Conc 505.0 PPM AVG: 505.0 PPM• o o o o •"

o

• oCAI Model 400 CLD NOX Analyzer Converter Efficiency

Test

Time Date

NOx
10:31:00 10:32:00 10:33:00 10:34:00 10:35:00 10:36:00 10:37:00 10:38:00 10:39:00 10:40:00 10:41:00 10:42:00 10:43:00 10:44:00 10:45:00 10:46:00 10:47:00 10:48:00 10:49:00 10:50:00 10:51:00 10:52:00 10:53:00 10:54:00 10:55:00 10:56:00 10:57:00 10:58:00 10:59:00 11:00:00 23-Feb-05

252.0 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 251.9 23-Feb-05 251.8 23-Feb-05 251.9 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 251.9 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 251.9 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 252.2 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 251.9 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.0 23-Feb-05 252.1 23-Feb-05 252.1 High:Low: Difference: % Efficiency:

252.2251.80.499.8%Model #: C5000
Serial #= 1376 APEX i•STRDMENTS
Method
522 Series Meter Calibration

Pre-Test Orifice Method English Meter Box Units, English Factor

Filename: C:\Documents

and Settings\stacyo\My

Doctu•ents\Company

Files\Stack

Test Templates\Method

Templet Revised! 7/25/95

Version:

•12/22/04
Barometric Pressure: 29.97 (in. Hg)
Theoretical Critical Vacuum•--->

14.14 (in.

valid test results, the Actual Vacutu•should

be 1 2 in. Hg greater than the Theoretical

Critical Vacuum shownabove.
The Critical Orifice Coefficient,

K', must be entered in English units, (ft)•3*(deg

R)^0.5/((in.

Hg)•(min)).

DRY GAS METER READI/•GS -CRITICAL ORIFICE READINGS-

(in H20)

0.62
i. I0
1.90
3.56

5.50

Vollune Vol•me

Volume

Initial Temps,

Final Temps. Orifice

Orifice Actual

Ambient Temperature
Time Initial

Final

Total

Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Serial# Coefficient

Vacuum% Initial Final A•erage (min) (cuft) (cuft)

(cuft) (de F) (deg F) (deg F) (deg F) (number) (see above) (in Eg) (deg F) (deg F) (deg F)
15.00 316.400 322.725

6.325

58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 DG48

0.331

22,5 68.0 68.0 68.0
i0.00 322.725 329.377

5,692

58.0 58.0 60.0 60.0 DG55

0.438 21.0 68.0 68.0 68.0
10.00 328.377 335,436

7.059

60.0 60.0 61.0 57.0 DG63 0.562

19.5 68.0 68.0 68.0
5.00 335.436 340.331

4.895

61.0 59.0 65.0 60.0 DG73

0,780

17.0 68.0 66,0 68.0
5.00 340.331 346,321

5.990

65.0 60.0 68.0 61.0 DGSI 0.959

15.0 68.0 68.0 68.0

DRY GAS ORIFICE GAS METER ORIFICE

VOL•{E VOLU• VOLU•4E

CALIBR•TION

FACTOR

CORRECTED CORRECTED

CORR

CORR •OMINAL

Y Vm(std) "qm(std)

Vcr(std)

Vcr(std)

Vcr

Value Variation (cuft) (liters)

{cuft)

(liters)

(cuft)

(n•mber) (number)

6.465 183.1

6.476

183.4 6.468

1,002 -0.007
5.773 163.5

5.708

161.6 5.700

0.989 -0.020
7.217 204.4

7.330

207.6 7.321

1.016 0.007
5,008 141.8

5.084

144.0 5.078

1.015 0,007

6.131 173.6

6.257

177•2 6.249

1.021 0.012

CALIBRATION

FACTOR

Value Value ariation (in E20) (• M20) (in M20)

1.895 48.13 -0.073
1.936 49.16 -0.032
2.029 51.53 0,061
1.972 50.08 0.004 2.008' 50.99 0.040

Average 1.008 1.96• 49.98

Average

Nete: Calibration

Factor Y, the ratio of the reading of the calibration

meter the dry gas meter, acceptable tolerance of individual values from average is +-0.02,
Oxifice Calibration

Factor d•@, the orifice differential

pressure in inches of E20 that equates

0.75 cfm of air
68 and 29.92 inches Eg, acceptable

toleran • Of individual values from the average is / • ,,:• .->•;.•i S•ED: I .,:•'• I• '-'<•''•" D•te:

..... ?-.., •Sample Probe Calibratior• Inspected By: Inspection Date: Probe ID:

Pitot Tube Openings

Damaged? Pitot Tube AligmDe.nt

OK? Calibration Required? External Tube Diameter

(Dr)* *Dt must be be•wceen 3/16 abd 3/8 Base-to-plane opening distances (Pa and Pb)* *Pa Pb Yes[

No[ 'Z" YeA X

No[ Yes[ No•
Dt 0.375

Pa 0.4375 Pb 0.4375 PWDt 1.t7 (Mustbebetween 1.05 and 1.5) Ifpitot does not meet the criteria specified above it must be repaired or calibrated in accordance with Sections 4.1.2 through 4.15 of Method 2. Baseline coefficient of 0.84 applied to pitots that meet inspection criteria.

TargetTemp. Reference

Indicated Temp. Temp. Ice-32F Ambient-70F _• ,• o Hot Oil-150F Boiling H20-212F Hot Oil-150F Temp.

% Difference Difference

Specification

% Difference

< 1.5

Comments:

Alleg

&Date:Calibrated By: Nozzle Calibration

Notes:

a: Three different nozzle diameters, each diameter must be within 0.00]" b: DiffD maximum difference between any two diameters 0.004
c: D avg average of D1, D2, and D3

ROBERTSSample Probe Calibration
Inspection Date: Probe ID:

Pitot Tube Openings

Damaged? Pitot Tube Aligmzqe.nt

OK? Calibration Required? External Tube Diameter

(Dr)* *Dr must be between 3/16 abd 3/8 Base-to-plane opening distances (Pa and Pb)* *Pa Pb Dt

0.375

Pa 0.4375 Pb 0.4375 Pa/Dt I. 17 (Must be between 1.05 and 1.5) Ifpitot does not meet the criteria specified above it must be repaired or calibrated in accordance with Sections 4. 1,2 through 4.15 of Method 2. Baseline coefficient of 0.84 applied to pitots that meet inspection criteria,

TargetTemp. Ice-32F Ambient-70F Hot Oil-150F Boiling HzO-212F Hot Oil-150F

Reference Temp.

Indicated Temp.

Temp. Difference

0

Difference

Specification
% Difference

< 1.5

C orrkrrlents:Date:Calibrated By: Nozzlle Ca•l•bratien

Notes:

a: Three different nozzle diame[ers, each dimneter must be within 0.001" b: Diff 13 maximum difference between any two diameters 0.004
c: D avg average ofDl, D2, and D3Appendix EPROCESS DATA Facility: General Shale- Roanoke Source: Kiln Scrubber/Baghouse

• 0.•0

• 92•.•' J i,•}•,

7,810 _[ 8,2}9 2/24/20051 •

• / •,-•

• / •ROANOKE FEB 2005

Run Number Daterime Began rime Ended 1

2

3

Mean 2/24/2005 2/24/2005

2/24/2005 8:07 9:49

1:22 9:07 t0:49

12:21
Run Time, min Production Data, lbs ofbrick/hr Production Data, number ofbricks/hr Natural gas usage, scedhr Coal Usage, lbs/hr Volumetric Flow Rate, dscfm Nox Concentration,

ppmvd SO2 Concentration,

ppmvd 6(}

60

60

60 29,624 29,624

29,624

29,624 •L229 g.229

g.229

8229 '7.g I0 7A50

g.240

7,833 !,424 1,470

1,454

1,449 22,526 22,726

22,425

22,559 75.4 76.4

75.9

75.9 68.7 70.2

69.4

69.5
NOx Emission Rate, lbs/hr SO2 Emission Rate, lbs/hr NOx Emission Factor, lbs/ton brick SO2 Emission Factor, lbs/ton brick NOx Emission Facotr, lbs/1000 bricks SO2 Emission Factor, lbs/1000 bricks NOx Emission Factor, lbs/ton coal SO2 Emission Factor, lbs/ton coal

12.2

12.4

12.2

12.3 15.5 15.9

15.5

15.6 0.8 0.8

0.8

0.8 1.0 1.1

1.0

1.1 1.5 1.5

1.5

1.5 1.9 1.9

1.9

1.9 17.1 16.9

16.8

16.9 21.7 21.7

21.4

21.6t5-1

IIIYO