alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

112TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 127 

To deauthorize appropriation of funds to carry out the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2011 

Mr. GRAVES of Georgia (for himself, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. COFFMAN of 

Colorado, Mr. CHAFFETZ, Ms. JENKINS, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. JONES, 

Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CULBERSON, and Mr. 

BROUN of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, Education and the Workforce, the Judiciary, 

Natural Resources, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To deauthorize appropriation of funds to carry out the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 

Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DEAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO 

4 CARRY OUT PPACA AND HCERA. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no funds 

6 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the proviVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:48 Jan 11, 2011 Jkt 099200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H127.IH H127

jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 127 IH

1 sions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

2 (Public Law 111–148), the Health Care and Education 

3 Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–152), and 

4 any amendment made by either such Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSKDVH8Z91PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KAREEM FARRELL

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1564

[ August 16, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 2010CF002086 A

.

Kareem Farrell, We wahitchka, pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Barney Lee STRICKLAND, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 36810.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 1, 1964.

No attorney of record on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the felony offense of drunk driving; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $350.

The record contains no bills of exception or statement of facts.

The sentence orders the appellant’s confinement in jail for an indeterminate term of not less than 10 days nor more than 30 days, and a fine of $350.00 against him.

Art. 775 C.C.P., which provides for an indeterminate sentence, does not apply to jail terms. It applies only where the punishment is confinement in the penitentiary for more than the minimum term.

The sentence is reformed so as to provide that the defendant be imprisoned in jail for 30 days and be fined $350.00.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
Athens, 2£ January 2015

HELLENIC REPUBLIC

MINISTRY OF INFRASTRUCTURE Ref No: HCAA/D1/B/ ^^'

TRANSPORT AND NETWORKS

HEIIENIC CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF AIR TRANSPORT

AIR TRANSPORT AND INT'L AGREEMENTS DIVISION

BILATERAL AIR AGREEMENTS SECTION

To: Mr. M. Paul GRETCH

Director of Office of

International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

400 Seventh Street S.W.

Washington DC 20590

U.S.A.

Dear Mr Gretch,

Kindly be informed that further to the rights provided in the Air Transport Agreement

signed in Washington, on 30 April 2007, between the European Community and the

Government of the United States of America and the rights provided in the Air Transport

Agreement signed on 31st July 1991, between the Government of Hellenic Republic and the

Government of the United States extended until July 31 2007, the Hellenic Civil Aviation

Authority herewith confirms that it will grant, on the basis of reciprocity, rights to the U.S.

air carriers to provide non scheduled flights to/from the Greek territory.

Director of Air Transport

and International Agreements Division

Anastasios A. Kokkinos i c I // is

HCAA - PO Box 70360 -166 01 Glyfada -Athens -GREECE,

Tel. +30 210 8916121-149, FAX +310 210 8947132, e-mail: dlb@hcaa.gr
Guerra & Moore LLP, Carlos 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 28, 2014

No. 04-13-00213-CV

Mark A. CANTU,

Appellant

v.

GUERRA & MOORE LLP, Carlos Guerra, J. Michael Moore, and David Lumber,

Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CVQ0001154 D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On June 25, 2014, this court issued its opinion and judgment in this appeal. This court 

granted Appellees unopposed first motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing or a 

motion for en banc reconsideration until July 24, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1, 49.7, 49.8. 

On July 18, 2014, Appellees filed a notice of appearance of counsel and a second 

unopposed motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing until August 4, 2014. 

Appellees’ motion is GRANTED. Appellees’ motion is due on August 4, 2014. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of July, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 03-6133

JAMES CLAUDE BAILEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News.

Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CR-00-21, CA-02-93)

Submitted: June 16, 2003

Decided: June 27, 2003

Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

James Claude Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 
OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

James Claude Bailey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An

appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion on procedural grounds, a certificate of

appealability will not issue unless the movant can demonstrate both

"(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition

states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that

jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was

correct in its procedural ruling.’" Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th

Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert.

denied, 534 U.S. 941 (2001). 

As to Bailey’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims, the district

court denied those claims because they were not raised in Bailey’s

direct appeal. At the time it issued its decision, the district court did

not have the benefit of Massaro v. United States, __ U.S. __, 123 S.

Ct. 1690, 1696 (2003) (holding that failure to raise ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal does not bar movant from

raising such claims in a § 2255 motion). While we conclude that

jurists of reason could debate the correctness of the district court’s

procedural ruling, we have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Bailey has not demonstrated the denial of a constitutional right as to his ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See

Miller-El v. Cockrell, __ U.S. __, 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). 

The district court denied the remainder of Bailey’s claims because

he failed to raise them on direct appeal. We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Bailey has not made the requisite showing to obtain a certificate of appealability as to those claims.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2 UNITED STATES v. BAILEY
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3103

_____________________________

IMMANUEL WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

James Daniel, Judge.

September 24, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Immanuel Williams, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6502
STEVEN CUPP, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILLIAM HUTCHINGS; ANTHONY HUSSION; K. M. WHITE; HARRELL WATTS; JOHN DOE, from the F.O.I.A. Administrative Office in Washington D.C., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:07-cv-00161-IMK-JES) Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: June 2, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Cupp, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Steven Cupp appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cupp v. Hutchings , No. 1:07-cv-00161-IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated March 23, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-215491) of Smart Trust 303,
comprising Smart Trust, High 20 Dividend Strategy Trust, Series 16.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


March 23, 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10(b)


                              MINNTECH CORPORATION
                           BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
                               FEBRUARY 25, 1998


     RESOLVED, that the 1989 Stock Plan (the "1989 Plan") of the Company, as 
previously amended, is hereby further amended effective as of February 25, 
1998, as follows:

     1.  The second paragraph of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended by 
adding the following sentence thereto:

     "If, in accordance with the Plan, an optionee uses shares of common 
stock of the Company to (i) pay the exercise price of a Stock Option or (ii) 
satisfy tax withholdings, only the number of shares issued net of shares 
tendered in payment of such exercise price and tax withholdings shall be 
deemed to be issued for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares 
available under the Plan."

     2.  New paragraph 5(1) is added as follows:

     "(1) RELOAD OPTIONS.  If the Committee so determines, the agreement 
relating to any Stock Option may provide for the issuance of "reload" Stock 
Options pursuant to which, subject to the terms and conditions established by 
the Committee and any requirements of applicable law, the optionee will, 
either automatically (to the extent shares remain available under this Plan) 
or subject to subsequent Committee approval, be granted a new Stock Option 
when the payment of the exercise price of the original Stock Option, and/or 
the payment of tax withholdings pursuant to Section 12(d) hereof, is made 
through the delivery to the Company of shares of the Company by the optionee, 
such new "reload" Stock Options (i) being a Non-statutory Stock Option to 
purchase the number of shares provided as consideration for exercise price 
and in payment of taxes in connection with the exercise of the original Stock 
Option, (ii) having a per share exercise price equal to the Fair Market Value 
as of the date of exercise of the original Stock Option, (iii) being 
immediately exercisable and having a term of ten years from the date of the 
original Stock Option (that is, such reload Stock Option will terminate on 
the date the original Stock Option terminates), and (iv) otherwise having the 
same terms and conditions as the original Stock Option, except that it will 
not be an incentive stock option and will not provide for an automatic grant 
of additional reload Stock Options upon its exercise."
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-13-000010216-MAY-201309:31 AM
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 654

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for

the vessel SUNRISE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the

9 coastwise trade for the vessel SUNRISE (United States

10 official number 950381).

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 654

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

coastwise trade for the vessel SUNRISE.propriate endorsement for employment in theissue a certificate of documentation with the ap-
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 615 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 615

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
    Veterans Affairs to furnish outpatient medical services for any 
                disability of a former prisoner of war.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 24 (legislative day, March 23), 1995

 Mr. Akaka (for himself and Mr. Craig) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Secretary of 
    Veterans Affairs to furnish outpatient medical services for any 
                disability of a former prisoner of war.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF FORMER PRISONERS OF WAR TO RECEIVE OUTPATIENT 
              MEDICAL SERVICES FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 1712(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking out ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (C);
            (2) by striking out the period at the end of subparagraph 
        (D) and inserting in lieu thereof ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
            ``(E) to any former prisoner of war for any disability.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

Rule 219. Annual Registration of Attorneys

(a) Every attorney admitted to practice law in this Commonwealth shall pay an

annual fee of [$120.00] $140.00 and electronically file the annual fee form provided for in

this rule by July 1. The fee shall be collected under the supervision of the Attorney

Registration Office, which shall make the annual fee form available for filing through a

link on the Board’s website (http://www.padisciplinaryboard.org) or directly at

https://ujsportal.pacourts.us. The said fee shall be used to defray the costs of disciplinary

administration and enforcement under these rules, and for such other purposes as the

Board shall, with the approval of the Supreme Court, from time to time determine. Upon

an attorney’s written request submitted to the Attorney Registration Office and for good

cause shown, the Attorney Registration Office shall grant an exemption from the

electronic filing requirement and permit the attorney to file the annual fee form in paper

form.

*****2

Rule 502. Pennsylvania Lawyers Fund for Client Security

*** **

(b) Additional fee. Every attorney who is required to pay an active annual fee under

Rule 219 (relating to annual registration of attorneys) shall pay an additional fee of

[$75.00] $60.00 for use by the Fund. Such additional fee shall be added to, and collect ed

with and in the same manner as, the basic annual fee. All amounts received pursuant to

this subdivision shall be credited to the Fund.

*****3

Rule 1.15. Safekeeping Property

*** **

(u) Every attorney who is required to pay an active annual assessment under Rule

219 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement (relating to annual registration

of attorneys) shall pay an additional annual fee of [ $30.00 ] $25.00 for use by the I OLTA

Board. Such additional assessment shall be added to, and collected with and in the same

manner as, the basic annual assessment. All amounts received pursuant to this

subdivision shall be credited to the IOLTA Board.

*****
EX-10.4



 EXHIBIT 10.4 

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Named
Executive Officers are eligible to receive an annual incentive of up to 30% of Base Salary at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Performance expectations are established around the attainment of specific performance ratios, performance to
current year financial plan, and satisfactory compliance with regulatory and audit reviews as well as consideration of the potential impact of executives’ actions on safe and sound operations and appropriate risk management controls. The Board
retains the flexibility to make discretionary adjustments up or down based on performance judgments that may be subjective. The Board of Directors annually determine what percentage is to be paid, generally at a meeting of the Board of Directors in
February of each year, or, if the audited financial statements for CSB are not prepared at least seven (7) days before such meeting, at a meeting of the Board of Directors in March.
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-106616) and
Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-18278, 33-56420, 33-53303, 333-51073, 333-93803, 333-47268, and
333-102321) of our report dated March 4, 2005, relating to the financial statements of Elgin Riverboat ResortRiverboat Casino, appearing in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Mandalay Resort Group for the year ended January 31, 2005.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Memphis,
Tennessee
April 15, 2005

---



QuickLinks
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 91 0 . J UAN KEON HARRI S v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 0 8
, J u an K e o n H a r ri s was co nv i ct ed o f m al ice m u rd er, fel o n y m

u rd er,

ag g rav at ed as s au l t , an d po s ses s i o n o f a fi rearm d u r i n g t h e co m m i s s i o n o f a fel o n y

.

Harri s fi l ed a m o t io n fo r n ew t ri al
, wh i ch t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed

. Harri s t h en fi l ed t h i s

ap p eal . Th e Su p rem e Co u rt , h o wev er, h as ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t h i s cas e.

T h e Su prem e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er “ [a] l l cas es i n w h i c h a

s en t en ce o f deat h was i m p o s ed o r co u l d be i m

p o s e d

. ” Ga. Co n st

. o f 1 9 8 3
, Art

. VI,

Sec. VI, P a r

. I I I ( 8 )

. Becau s e a p en al t y o f d eat h m ay b e i m p o sed fo r t h e cri m e o f

m u rd er, ju ri s d i ct i o n i s pro per in t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

. See O CGA § 1 6 -5 -1 (e) (1 ); Nea l

v. S t a t e , 2 9 0 G a. 5 6 3
, 5 7 2 (7 2 2 SE2 d 7 6 5 ) (2 0 12 ) (Hu n st ei n , C. J
., co n cu rri n g ); s ee

al s o S t a te v. Th o r n t o n , 2 5 3 Ga. 5 2 4
, 5 2 4 (1 ) (3 22 SE2 d 7 1 1 ) (1 9 8 4 ) (d i rect i n g t h i s

Co u rt t o t ran s fer t o th e Su p rem e Co u rt “ al l cas es i n w h i ch ei t h er a s en t en ce o f d eat h

o r o f l i fe i m

p ri so n m en t h as b een i m

p o s ed u p o n co n vi ct io n of m urd er”), o v erru l ed in

p art o n o t h er g ro u n d s as reco g n i zed i n El l i ot t v. S t a t e , 3 0 5 Ga. 1 79
, 2 0 5 (III) (C) (i ) February 09, 2022(8 2 4 SE2 d 2 6 5 ) (2 0 1 9 ). Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e

Su p rem e Co u rt

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 02/09/2022