alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.94
   
   Registered Office
 Other Offices
   Time and Place of Meetings
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice




---



##### 



Quorum
 Voting
 Method of Voting
 Action Without Meeting
 2




---



##### 



Responsibilities
 Number; Term
 Vacancies; Increases
 Place of meetings
 3




---



##### 



Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Quorum; Majority Vote
 Minutes
 Committees.
 Committee Minutes
 Action Without Meeting
 4




---



##### 



Method
 Waiver
   Number
 5




---



##### 



Appointed Officers
 Removal
 Compensation
 Duties
       6




---



##### 



Checks
 Fiscal Year
 Telephone and Similar Meetings
 Distributions and Share Dividends
 . Amendment of Bylaws
 7
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 533 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal court, and 
                          for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL.

    The first sentence of section 1447(c) of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``any defect in removal procedure'' and 
inserting ``any defect other than lack of subject matter 
jurisdiction''.
            Passed the Senate June 30 (legislative day, June 19), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal court, and 
                          for other purposes.
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JANET C. HOWELL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-16037 

D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00514-ACK-RLP 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Alan C. Kay, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges. 

Janet C. Howell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

her action alleging federal claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review for an abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with Federal 

Rule of Civil Procedure 8. McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 1996). 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-16037 

We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Howell’s action

for failure to comply with Rule 8(a). Despite the district court’s warnings and 

instructions, Howell’s amended complaint was vague, confusing, and failed to 

contain a short and plain statement of the grounds for the district court’s 

jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); McHenry, 84 F.3d at 1177 (affirming 

dismissal of complaint that was “argumentative, prolix, replete with redundancy, 

and largely irrelevant”); Nevijel v. N. Coast Life Ins. Co., 651 F.2d 671, 674 (9th 

Cir. 1981) (dismissal under Rule 8 was not an abuse of discretion where the 

complaint was “verbose, confusing and conclusory”).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on appeal. 

See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

All pending motions and requests are denied. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CareScience, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Bell, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/STEVEN BELLSteven Bell
Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
August 8, 2002 |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

---

QuickLinks
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 216

To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of expenses for business

meals and entertainment.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 12 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. INOUYE (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. REID, Mr. SMITH, Mr.

COATS, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. STEVENS,

and Mr. HOLLINGS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of expenses

for business meals and entertainment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN BUSINESS MEALS

4 AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX DEDUCTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 274(n)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to only

7 50 percent of meal and entertainment expenses allowed

8 as deduction) is amended by striking ‘‘50 percent’’ and

9 inserting ‘‘80 percent’’.
2

•S 216 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading for

2 section 274(n) is amended by striking ‘‘50’’ and inserting

3 ‘‘80’’.

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

6 December 31, 1993.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, V. Bryan Lawlis, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aradigm Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
   /s/ V. Bryan Lawlis     V. Bryan Lawlis
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.0

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-91523 and 333-91525) pertaining to the SMC Cash Accumulation
Plan and The SCPIE Holdings Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan, respectively, of
our report dated February 16, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2000.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 26, 2001
# crowell
~ , ~ 

# moring 3001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004-2595■ p 202 624-2500■ f 202 628-5116

Gerald F. Murphy (202) 508-8855 gmurphy@crowell.com
June 2, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr. Paul Gretch Director Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation Room W86-316 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Polling Results for Application of United Airlines, Inc. for an Exemption and Designation, Docket DOT-OST-2015-0120 Dear Mr. Gretch: We have polled and received non-objections from each of the carriers on the attached service list for the above-referenced United l application. Prompt approval is requested so that United can secure foreign authority, make final operating plans, and begin marketing the Chicago-Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo flights well in advance of operations, which it plans to commence on or about December 19, 2015, provided all necessary approvals have been secured. Respectfully submitte F. Murphy Counsel for United Airlines, Inc.
cc: Robert Finamore, Brian Hedberg, Brett Kruger All Parties on the attached Service List

1 Common names are used for airlines.

Crowell & Moring LLP . www.crowell.com . Washington, DC . New York . San Francisco . Los Angeles . Orange County . Anchorage . London . BrusselsSERVICE LIST

bob.kneisleyAwnco. com leslie.abbottkwnco.com dheffernan_

~ a,cozen. com j eremy.rossgalaskaair. com ho ward. kas sg aa. c om robert. wiri ckg aa. com patrick.rizzi c

(
~ e ,hoganlovells.com robert.cohnghoganlovells.com esahr@eckertseamans.com ddercokeckertseamans.com robert.landk j etblue. com sascha.vanderbellengdelta. com chris.walker(a

~ delta. com dkirsteing yklaw. com j young_(cr
~ ,yklaw. com thomas. ting(a

~ suncountry. com i ohn.fredericksen(?,suncountry.com barbara.russelln

e a,virginamerica. com iohn.varleygvirginamerica.com anita.mosnerna

e ,hklaw. com j ennifer. nowakghklaw. com ns sparksg fedex. com b g leoparda,fedex.com matwoodgcozen.com dwight.moore(
~

a,ustranscom.mil john.s.duncan a

~ faa.gov en letsgstate.gov

Crowell & Moring LLP . www.crowell.com . Washington, DC . New York . San Francisco . Los Angeles . Orange County . Anchorage . London . Brussels
SERVED: JANUARY 25,2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC INTHE MATTER OF GRANTAVIATION, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED] (Civil PenaltyAction) FDMS NO. FAA.;,2012-1268 NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OFPROCEEDING Thisproceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2011AL030055) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other COini1.1Unications regardingthis proceeding shall be servedontheJudge, the FAAHearing Docket, andthe otherpersons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment - Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 1 Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel

Law Office of Brent R. Cole, P.C.

821 N Street, S\lite 208 Anchorage, AK 99501 TEL: 907-277-8001 FAX: 907-277-8002
ONE COPY Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel Alaskan Region

Federal Aviation Administration 222 W. 7th Avenue #14 Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 TEL: 907-271-5271 FAX: 907-271-2800

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20

U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1268 (Civil Penalty Actiop) 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 14, 2017

t0411

Order 

Clerk

April 14, 2017

153669-70

In re Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER

_________________________________________

SHERRY BIERKLE, Personal Representative of

the Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER,

Appellant,

v SC: 153669

COA: 322996 

Oakland Probate Ct: 

ERNEST LEE UMBLE, 2012-341834-DE

Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

In re Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER

_________________________________________

SHERRY BIERKLE, Personal Representative of

the Estate of KENNETH JAMES KOEHLER,

Appellant,

and

JOESPH YORK, EDMUND YORK, RONALD

McKEEL, DANIEL McKEEL, GREGORY

McKEEL, MICHAEL SIES, NANCY

SCHREIBER, and TERRI CARTER,

Interested Persons,

v SC: 153670

COA: 322997 

Oakland Probate Ct: 

ERNEST LEE UMBLE, 2012-341834-DE

Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to 

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for 

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
PROMISSORY
NOTE


 





	$4,000	July
    6th 2016







 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Chad Tendrich (the “Maker”), promises to pay to the order of Cyclone Power Technologies,
Inc. (the “Holder”), in the manner hereinafter specified in this Note, the principal sum of four thousand and 00/100
Dollars ($4,000) (the “Principal Amount”).


 


The
Principal amount remaining outstanding under this Note, plus all accrued but unpaid interest shall be due and payable on September
6, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”). Interest shall be at the rate of 4% annually.


 


THIS
NOTE IS PAYABLE IN FULL ON THE MATURITY DATE. AT MATURITY, THE MAKER MUST REPAY THE ENTIRE UNPAID PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THIS NOTE
AND UNPAID INTEREST THEN DUE. 


 


This
Note shall be repaid in lawful money of the United States of America at such place as may be designated by the Holder.


 


This
Note may be prepaid without penalty at any time. This Note shall be construed and enforced according to the laws of the State
of Florida.


 


If
default be made in the payment of any sums mentioned in this Note, and shall continue for a period of ten (10) days after receipt
by the Maker of written notice of such default, the entire unpaid Principal Amount shall at the option of the Holder of this Note
become at once due and collectible without notice. Failure to exercise this option shall not constitute a waiver of the right
to exercise the same in the event of any subsequent default.


 


Each
person liable on this Note whether Maker or endorser, hereby waives presentment, protest, notice, notice of protest and notice
of dishonor and agrees to pay all costs, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, whether suit be brought or not, if, after
maturity of this Note or default hereunder, counsel shall be employed to collect this Note.


 


	 	Maker:	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:	Chad
    Tendrich


 


	Acknowledged
    by Holder:	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Cyclone
    Power Technologies, Inc.
From: Patricia Grim/DC/USEPA/US

To: Mariana Cubeddu/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Mary Henigin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nathaniel Jutras/DC/USEPA/US

Date: 12/18/2009 12:38 PM

Subject: RIA for NO2 Primary NAAQS; SAN 5111 - Electronic Version

Hi Mariana,

Re-sending the RIA for above referenced rule. This was provided to Nate last Wednesday.

Here's the NO2 NAAQS RIA so you have it at the ready when the NAAQS package is ready to go 

to OMB:

Patricia Grim

Washington Operations

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Office of Air and Radiation

Room 5449F, Ariel Rios North

Phone: (202) 564-6583

Fax: (202) 564-1543
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. (Communicate) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Jeffs, President, Chief Executive Officer of Communicate and the sole member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of Communicate.
 
 /s/ David M. Jeffs  David M. Jeffs  Chief Executive Officer
 May 14, 2004
  
 Page - 17
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. (Communicate) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Cameron Pan, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Communicate, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of Communicate.
 
 /s/ J. Cameron Pan  J. Cameron Pan  Chief Financial Officer
 May 14, 2004
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-0105V

UNPUBLISHED

MICHELLE LAING,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: January 14, 2022

Voluntary dismissal; Order 

concluding proceedings.

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On January 5, 2021, Michelle Laing filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa—10 through 34.2

Petitioner alleged that she developed Shoulder Injuries Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA) from a flu vaccine she received on September 6, 2019. Petition 

at 1. On December 20, 2021, Petitioner submitted a notice of voluntary dismissal.

In light of Petitioner filing a “notice of dismissal at any time before service of 

respondent’s report” pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), this case is dismissed without 

prejudice. Accordingly, this Order hereby notifies the Clerk of Court that 

proceedings “on the merits” of this petition are now concluded, but no judgment 

“on the merits” should be entered by the Clerk’s Office.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

1 Although I have not formally designated this Order for publication, I am required to post it on the United 

States Court of Federal Claims' website because it contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this 

case, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal 

Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available 

to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, 

I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
Exhibit 10.14

SEVENTEENTH AMENDMENT  TO THE  MANDALAY RESORT GROUP  EMPLOYEES' PROFIT SHARING AND INVESTMENT PLAN

This Seventeenth Amendment to the Mandalay Resort Group Employees' Profit Sharing and Investment Plan is made and entered into this 31ST day of
December, 2002, but is effective as of January 1, 2002, except as otherwise provided herein, by Mandalay Resort Group (referred to hereinafter as the "Company").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the Company and the other Employers have previously adopted the Mandalay Resort Group Employees' Profit
Sharing and Investment Plan, which has been amended from time to time (as amended, the "Plan"); and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the Company is authorized and empowered to further amend the Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Company deems it advisable and in the best interests of the Participants to amend the Plan to comply with recent changes in
applicable law.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

I.

Effective as of July 1, 2002, paragraph (m) of Article VI of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

(m)Catch-up Contributions.Each Participant who is eligible to make elective deferrals under the
Plan during the Plan Year and has attained the age of 50 before the close of the Plan Year shall be eligible to make "catch-up" contributions in accordance with, and subject to the
limitations of, Section 414(v) of the Code. A "catch-up" contribution hereunder may be expressed as a fixed dollar amount per payroll period, or as a fixed percentage of pay.
Such "catch-up" contributions shall not be taken into account for purposes of the provisions of the Plan implementing the required limitations of Sections 402(g) and 415 of the Code. The
Plan shall not be treated as failing to satisfy the provisions of the Plan implementing the requirements of Section 401(k)(3), 401(k)(11), 401(k)(12), 410(b), or 416 of the Code, as applicable,
by reason of the making of such "catch-up" contributions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Seventeenth Amendment has been executed as of the date first written above.

|ATTEST:                      |  | MANDALAY RESORT GROUP
|---------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|(CORPORATE SEAL)             |  |                      
|/s/YVETTE E. LANDAUSecretary |  | By:                  
|                             |  |                      

1

---

QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

COREY LYNN CUNNINGHAM,

 Appellant,

v.

JAPRYNGE CUNNINGHAM,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00180-CV

Appeal from

146th District Court

of Bell County, Texas

(TC # 280,382-B)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal. We further order 

that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.