alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0895

FROM: Larry Sorrels, US EPA/OAQPS/HEID

DATE: October 17, 2011

SUBJECT: Links to References Related to the Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Proposed 

Manganese Ferroalloys RTR.

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide citations and links to electronic versions of the 

following key references in the Regulatory Impact Analysis.

Roman, et al., 2008. Expert Judgment Assessment of the Mortality Impact of Changes in 

Ambient Fine Particulate Matter in the U.S. Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 7, 2268 – 2274. Found 

on the Internet at. http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es0713882. 

Fann, N., C.M. Fulcher, B.J. Hubbell. 2009. “The influence of location, source, and emission 

type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution.” Air Qual 

Atmos Health (2009) 2:169–176. Found on the Internet at 

http://www.springerlink.com/content/1381522137744641/fulltext.html.

Pope et al, 2002. “Lung Cancer, Cardiopulmonary Mortality, and Long-term Exposure to Fine 

Particulate Air Pollution.” Journal of the American Medical Association. 287:1132-

1141. Found on the Internet at http://jama.ama-assn.org/content/287/9/1132.full.pdf+html. 

Laden et al, 2006. “Reduction in Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Mortality.” American Journal 

of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 173: 667-672. Found on the Internet at 

http://ajrccm.atsjournals.org/cgi/reprint/173/6/667.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 149 (Thursday, August 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 46146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18941]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7967]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Shock of the News''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Shock of the News,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at The National Gallery of Art, 
Washington, DC from on or about September 23, 2012, until on or about 
January 27, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet 
to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: July 24, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-18941 Filed 8-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 112th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1292 Introduced in House (IH)]

112th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1292

  To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that greenhouse gases are not 
              subject to the Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2011

 Mr. Cuellar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that greenhouse gases are not 
              subject to the Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Production Freedom Act''.

SEC. 2. GREENHOUSE GAS REGULATION UNDER CLEAN AIR ACT.

    Section 302(g) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7602(g)) is amended 
by adding the following at the end thereof: ``The term `air pollutant' 
shall not include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, 
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, or sulfur hexafluoride.''.

SEC. 3. CLIMATE CHANGE NOT REGULATED BY CLEAN AIR ACT.

    Nothing in the Clean Air Act shall be treated as authorizing or 
requiring the regulation of climate change or global warming.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIRD DISTRICT , AT AUST IN NO. 03-00-00325-CR Roy Edwa rd Caples , Appellant

v. The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE

DISTRICT CO URT OF COMAL COUNT Y, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR95-207, HONORAB LE FRED CL

ARK, JUDGE

PRESIDING Appellant Roy Edward Caples

was ad judged gu

ilt y after he plead

ed guilty to driving while intoxicated, felony offense. SeeTex. Penal Code Ann . §§ 49. 04(a), . 09(b) ( West Supp. 2001). The court assessed punishment at impr isonment f

or t hree y ears, as called for in a plea bargain a

greement. Appellant repr esents himself on

appeal, as he d

id at trial. Appellan

t did not file a brief. We haveexami ned the record bef ore us and find no fundamental er ror that should be considered in the interest of justice.2 The judgment of conviction is affir med.

__________________________________________ Jan P. Patter son B efore Chief

Justice Abouss ie, Justices Yeake l and Patter son Affirm ed F iled: March 15, 2001 Do N ot Pu blish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-589 and 731-TA-1394-1396 (Review)]

## Determinations

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on forged steel fittings from China and the antidumping duty orders on forged steel fittings from China, Italy, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.[2] 

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on August 1, 2023 (88 FR 50172) and determined on November 6, 2023 that it would conduct expedited reviews (88 FR 84361, December 5, 2023).

                    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on January 26, 2024. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5486 (January 2024), entitled                     *Forged Steel Fittings from China, Italy, and Taiwan: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-589 and 731-TA-1394-1396 (Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 26, 2024.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             Commissioner Jason E. Kearns not participating.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-01929 Filed 1-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
List of Documents Submitted by the State of Colorado

 December 31, 2012, Letter from Christopher E. Urbina, MD, MPH, Executive Director and Chief 

Medical Officer, Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment to Carl Daly, Air 

Program Director, U.S. EPA Region 8, Denver, CO. Certification that the states meets the 

requirements of Clean Air Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards.

 State of Colorado Provisions to Meet the Requirements of Section 110(a) (1) and (2) of the Clean 

Air Act
<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Robert Rosner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First
Cypress  Technologies,  Inc.  for  the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
on  Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and  results  of  operations  of  First  Cypress  Technologies,  Inc.


                             By:    /s/ ROBERT ROSNER
                                    ----------------------------
                             Name:
  ROBERT ROSNER
                             Title: Chief  Executive  Officer  &
                                    Chief  Financial  Officer


                             Date:  November  19,  2002
#### Robert Henry KIDD, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29142.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 5, 1958.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The opinion delivered in this case on the 23rd day of October, 1957, dismissing the appeal for the want of a sentence, is hereby withdrawn and the appeal reinstated.

This is a conviction for driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, with punishment assessed at a fine of $100 and sixty days’ confinement in jail.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, without which' — all proceedings appearing to be regular — nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0087 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 - SW - 029 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
mmmi 

OF TRANSPORTATION 

AND PUBLIC FACILITIES 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR 

4111 AVIA TION A VENUE 

PO Box 196900 

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6900 

PHONE: (907) 269-0730 

FAX: (907) 269-0489 

WEB: dotstate.ak.us 

June 25, 2010 

CJ 

Mr. Denms^J. DeVany 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: DOT-OST 2008-0201 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

This letter is to express support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS) program 

in Alaska and the critical transportation connection it brings to our most remote communities. 

Due to the inaccessible location of these conmiunities and the complete lack of any road system 

connection, this subsidized air service is the only form of scheduled transportation. The 

community of Rampart depends on scheduled air freight, passenger and mail service for basic 

necessities, routine medical and health services, and economic welfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are best positioned to comment on 

"particularscheduies or air carriers andrtherefore^weieave those specific areas for the community 

response. 

I respectfully urge USDOT to support and continue the EAS service at Rampart. 

Sincerely, 

/?/* 

Marc Luiki 

Deputy Commissioner of Aviation 

cc: Leo von Scheben, Commissioner, DOT&PF 

"Providing for the safe movement of people and goods and the deliver}> of state services.
**Exhibit 32**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**
**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)**

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.                                      The accompanying Annual Report of NVE Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: May 6, 2009

 

 

/s/ DANIEL A. BAKER

 

Daniel A. Baker

President andChief Executive Officer

 

 

/s/CURT A. REYNDERS

 

Curt A. Reynders

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.11(B)



 Exhibit 10.11(b) 

June 1, 2016 
 The Cambridge Strategy (Asset Mgt.) Ltd. 

Berger House 
 36-38 Berkeley Square, 7th Floor 

Mayfair, London W1J5AE 
 UK 

Attention: Mr. Tony Henry 

Re:    Management Agreement Renewal 

Dear Mr. Henry: 
 We are writing with
respect to your management agreement concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreement”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreement through June 30, 2017 and all other provisions of
the Management Agreement will remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	 Cambridge Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Currency & Commodity L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Fund Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036 or fax to 866-428-9026. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212-296-6808 or contact Jack Yuen at 212-296-1320. 

Very truly yours, 
 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 

			
		
	By:        	 	/s/ Patrick T. Egan
		 	Patrick T. Egan
		 	President and Director

 THE CAMBRIDGE STRATEGY (ASSET MGT.) LTD. 

			
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Edward Baker            
		
	Print Name:    	 	Edward Baker            
		 	

 PE/kg
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-40142 and 333-90431) and S-8 (File Nos.
333-10043, 333-32143 and 333-87995) of Fusion Medical Technologies, Inc. of
our report dated February 7, 2001, except as to Note 14, which is as of April
9, 2001, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-
K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
April 9, 2001
#### Bessie COUNTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 35506.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 20, 1963.

No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Emmett Col-vin, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Dallas and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the making of a false representation in order to secure money under the terms of Article 107f, Vernon’s Ann.P.C.; the punishment, 30 days in jail.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is reformed to find appellant guilty of the offense set forth above and, as so reformed, is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6993

LARRY EDWARD HENDRICKS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE RUSHTON, Warden; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-03-3201-18BC-3) Submitted: August 25, 2004 Decided: September 10, 2004 Before WIDENER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Edward Hendricks, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, John William McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General, Samuel Creighton Waters, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry Edward Hendricks seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). As to claims dismissed by a district court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hendricks has not satisfied either standard. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.- 3 - We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2468

ELMER EDGARDO SARACAY VASQUEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: August 31, 2020 Decided: September 9, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond O. Griffith, THE LAW OFFICE OF RAYMOND O. GRIFFITH, P.A., 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Jessica 

E. Burns, Senior Litigation Counsel, Juria L. Jones, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil 

Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Elmer Edgardo Saracay Vasquez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal 

from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of 

removal.*

 We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Saracay 

Vasquez’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record 

evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, 

see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B)—including the adverse credibility finding—and that 

substantial evidence supports the denial of relief in this case, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias,

502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons 

stated by the Board. In re Saracay Vasquez (B.I.A. Nov. 26, 2019). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* Saracay Vasquez does not challenge the denial of his request for protection under 

the Convention Against Torture. He has therefore waived appellate review of this claim. 

See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004).