alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

We, the undersigned officers and directors of Parlex Corporation, hereby
severally constitute and appoint Edward D. Kutchin and Peter J. Murphy, and
each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys, with full power
indicated below, to sign for us the Report on Form 10-K of Parlex
Corporation for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002 and any required
amendments thereto, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they
may be signed by our said attorneys to said Report and any and all such
amendments.

Witness our hands on the dates set forth below:

Dated: September 27, 2002

* /s/ Herbert W. Pollack                         Director
---------------------------------------
      Herbert W. Pollack

* /s/ Sheldon A. Buckler                         Director
---------------------------------------
      Sheldon A. Buckler

* /s/ Richard W. Hale                            Director
---------------------------------------
      Richard W. Hale

* /s/ M. Joel Kosheff                            Director
---------------------------------------
      M. Joel Kosheff

* /s/ Peter J. Murphy                            Director
---------------------------------------
      Peter J. Murphy

* /s/ Lester Pollack                             Director
---------------------------------------
      Lester Pollack

* /s/ Benjamin Rabinovici                        Director
---------------------------------------
      Benjamin Rabinovici

<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 653 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                 S. 653

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                  coastwise trade for the vessel AURA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with the 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel AURA (United States official number 1027807).

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 653

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                  coastwise trade for the vessel AURA.
```
#### Launa THURMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28019.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 1, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

B. J. Pemberton, County Atty., Henry E. Pharr, Asst. Coufity Atty., Greenville, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the sale of whiskey in a dry area; -the punishment, a fine of $500.

The information charged that Roy Moore and the appellant, acting together, sold the whiskey to one Mason. Severance was granted, and appellant alone was on trial and has appealed.

Liquor Control Inspectors Mason and Brewer testified that they went to Commerce; and, after unsuccessfully attempting to buy whiskey from appellant and later from Roy Moore, they took Moore in their automobile to a certain place in the flats where they parked their automobile; and shortly thereafter the appellant drove up behind their automobile and stopped. They stated that Mason there delivered $2.50 to Moore; that he went back to the appellant’s automobile, delivered the money to her, and received from her a half-pint of whiskey ; and that Moore then returned to their automobile and delivered the whiskey to Mason.

The appellant, testifying in her own behalf, denied the entire transaction. Moore testified and admitted that he sold the whiskey to the officer but denied that he had gotten it from the appellant.

Under Moore’s testimony, he alone made the sale.

Under the State’s theory, the sale was made by the appellant to Moore and not to Mason, as alleged. It follows that the proof does not support the information.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Trinity Capital Partners. Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”), I, David Lazar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and               
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Dated:
    July 31, 2020 | By: | /s/
    David Lazar                                                          
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |     | David
    Lazar                                                              
|                         |     | Chief
        Executive Officer
        (Principal
        Executive Officer)
Calendar No. 141

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 595

[Report No. 104–108]

A BILL

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric

project located in the State of West Virginia.

JULY 11 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Reported without amendment
II

Calendar No. 141

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 595

[Report No. 104–108]

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located in the State

of West Virginia.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 22 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 1995

Mr. BYRD (for himself and Mr. ROCKEFELLER) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

JULY 11 (legislative day, JULY 10), 1995

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To provide for the extension of a hydroelectric project located

in the State of West Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En-
2

S 595 RS

1 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 7307, the

2 Commission shall, upon the request of the licensee for the

3 project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence,

4 and public interest requirements of that section and the

5 Commission’s procedures under that section, extend the

6 time period during which the licensee is required to com7 mence construction of the project so as to terminate on

8 September 26, 1999.

9 (b) APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) shall take effect

10 for the project described in subsection (a) upon the expira11 tion of the extension, issued by the Commission under sec12 tion 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the

13 period required for commencement of construction of the

14 project.

15 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If a li16 cense for the project described in subsection (a) has ex17 pired prior to the date of enactment of this Act, the Com18 mission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date

19 of its expiration and extend the time required for com20 mencement of construction of the project until September

21 26, 1999.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) of OPNET
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), I, Marc A. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Dated: November 5, 2010 |  | By: |  | /S/    MARC A.
COHEN                
|                        |  |     |  | Marc A. Cohen                       
|                        |  |     |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

N O

. 09

- 19

- 00226

- CV

__________________

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION , Appellant

V.

JANET SHERWOOD AND SCOTT STOVER , Appellee s

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 1A District Court

Tyler County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 24,277

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Federal National Mortgage Association filed a motion to dismiss

this appeal. This motion is voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision

of this Co urt. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed notice of appeal.

We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM2 Submitted on August 12, 2020

Opinion Delivered August 13, 2020

Before McKeithen, C.J. , Horton and Johnson, J J.
#### Ex parte Leo AXEL.

No. 39432.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 9, 1966.

Robert Darden, San Antonio, for appellant.

James E. Barlow, Dist. Atty., San Antonio, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from an order in a habeas corpus proceeding denying bail to appellant upon a complaint charging him with rape.

It is made to appear that subsequent to the entry of the order appealed from an indictment has been returned charging appellant with said offense, and the question of his right to bail upon the charge by complaint has therefore become moot. Ex Parte Bowles, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 346, 314 S.W.2d 108; Ex Parte Guajardo, 171 Tex.Cr. R. 328, 350 S.W.2d 206; Ex Parte Bowie, Tex.Cr.App., 368 S.W.2d 767.

The appeal is dismissed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR NOONEY INCOME FUND LTD.,  L.P. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>0000725266
<NAME> NOONEY INCOME FUND LTD., L.P.

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                              797,225
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       175,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    972,550
<PP&E>                                           10,251,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4,415,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6,883,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               280,203
<BONDS>                                           1,261,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                        5,226,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6,883,366
<SALES>                                           1,798,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,798,369
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,501,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  121,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     175,285
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        175,285
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          9.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolpho Valerio BAILEY, a/k/a J. Paul Rudy, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4241.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 13, 2002.

Decided Aug. 22, 2002.

*662Scott A. Shough, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas E. Johnston, United States Attorney, John C. Parr, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Rodolpho Valerio Bailey appeals the sixty-six month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to a single count of distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) (2000). Our review of the record discloses that Bailey knowingly and voluntarily waived his statutory right to appeal by the terms of his plea agreement. *See United States v. Marin,*961 F.2d 493, 496 (4th Cir.1992). This waiver precludes our review of his claim that the district court misapplied the sentencing guidelines. *See United States v. Brown,*232 F.3d 399, 402-03 (4th Cir.2000). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

# **Co-Registrant (Commission File Number000-30761):**

# ** **

**UbiquiTel Inc.**

**One West Elm Street**

**Suite 400**

**Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428**

 

**Co-Registrant (Commission File Number333-39950):**

**UbiquiTel Operating Company**

**One West Elm Street**

**Suite 400**

**Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428**

 

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTelOperating Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Donald A. Harris, Chief Executive Officer of UbiquiTel Inc.and UbiquiTel Operating Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel OperatingCompany.

 
|   | UBIQUITEL INC.                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | */s/ Donald A. Harris*                |   |
|   | Donald A. Harris                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | UBIQUITEL OPERATING COMPANY           |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | */s/ Donald A. Harris*                |   |
|   | Donald A. Harris                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | May 6, 2004                           |

 

----
#### Fred MARTIN et al., Appellants, v. Charles E. HALE’S ADMINISTRATRIX (Opal Nutter) et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

March 23, 1956.

See, also, 273 S.W.2d 819.

Claude P. Stephens, Prestonburg, for appellants.

Paul C. Combs, C.' Kilmer Combs, Pres-tonsburg, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Motion by Fred Martin and Stella Martin for an appeal from so much of a judgment against them as awarded interest from the date of filing the complaint. The suit was by a contractor who had built a house for the Martins, seeking to recover the unpaid balance of the original contract price, together with the cost of some extra work not covered by the contract. The Martins contend that the claim sued upon was an unliquidated one, and therefore interest should have been allowed only from the date of the judgment. The difference in interest amounts to a little more than $1,000.

 The rule is that the allowance of interest upon an unliquidated claim is in the discretion of the trial court. Kendall v. Mussman, Ky., 247 S.W.2d 502; Smith's Adm’x v. Smith’s Adm’r, 306 Ky. 106, 206 S.W.2d 200; Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Downey, 284 Ky. 72, 143 S.W.2d 869; Congoleum-Nairn, Inc., v. M. Livingston & Co., 257 Ky. 573, 78 S.W.2d 781. We cannot say that the trial court in the case before us abused its discretion in allowing interest from the date of filing the complaint.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of OPNET Technologies, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Marc A. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: February 7, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Marc A. Cohen
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Marc A. Cohen                       
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                   |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to OPNET Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by OPNET Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1
**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Joseph A. Sorge, M.D., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of StratageneCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and to the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.                        Date: June 14, 2004 By:  /s/ Joseph A. Sorge    Joseph A. Sorge, M.D.    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President