alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Bondy Tan, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Lightscape Technologies Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lightscape
      Technologies Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Lightscape Technologies Inc.                                                                      



Dated: February 14, 2008



/s/ Bondy TanBondy Tan President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lightscape
Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Lightscape Technologies Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 63

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide improved reimbursement for clinical social worker services under the medicare program,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

improved reimbursement for clinical social worker services under the medicare program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IMPROVED REIMBURSEMENT FOR CLINICAL

4 SOCIAL WORKER SERVICES UNDER MEDI5 CARE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1833(a)(1)(F)(ii) of the

7 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(1)(F)(ii)) is

8 amended to read as follows: ‘‘(ii) the amount determined

9 by a fee schedule established by the Secretary,’’.
2

•S 63 IS

1 (b) DEFINITION OF CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER

2 SERVICES EXPANDED.—Section 1861(hh)(2) of such Act

3 (42 U.S.C. 1395x(hh)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘services

4 performed by a clinical social worker (as defined in para5 graph (1))’’ and inserting ‘‘such services and such services

6 and supplies furnished as an incident to such services per7 formed by a clinical social worker (as defined in paragraph

8 (1))’’.

9 (c) CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER SERVICES NOT TO

10 BE INCLUDED IN INPATIENT HOSPITAL SERVICES.—Sec11 tion 1861(b)(4) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(b)(4)) is

12 amended by striking ‘‘and services’’ and inserting ‘‘clinical

13 social worker services, and services’’.

14 (d) TREATMENT OF SERVICES FURNISHED IN INPA15 TIENT SETTING.—Section 1832(a)(2)(B)(iii) of such Act

16 (42 U.S.C. 1395k(a)(2)(B)(iii)) is amended by striking

17 ‘‘and services’’ and inserting ‘‘clinical social worker serv18 ices, and services’’.

19 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall become effective with respect to pay21 ments made for clinical social worker services furnished

22 on or after January 1, 1996.

Æ
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 27
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             1,798
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      3,260
<ALLOWANCES>                                         118
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5,341
<PP&E>                                             2,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                       589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    15,617
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3,524
<BONDS>                                                0
<COMMON>                                              24
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                        11,884
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      15,617
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  17,470
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     27,711
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (2,618)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,066
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (8,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (1,262)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (7,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    1,892
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (5,535) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.24) 
<FN>
<F1>    Includes gain and sale of affiliate--4,664; interest income $337; and
        equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary--(2,383)
</FN>




        

</TABLE>
EX-10.7(A)



 Exhibit 10.7(a) 

June 1, 2016 
 Altis Partners (Jersey) Limited 

2 Hill Street 
 St Helier, Jersey 

Channel Islands JE2 4UA 
 Attention: Mr. Stephen Hedgecock

  

	 	Re:	Management Agreement Renewals 

 Dear Mr. Hedgecock: 

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the
“Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2017 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 

 

	 	•	 	Global Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


	 	•	 	CMF Altis Partners Master Fund L.P. 


	 	•	 	Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 


	 	•	 	Global Futures Fund Ltd. 


	 	•	 	Tactical Diversified Futures Fund L.P. 


	 	•	 	MSMF Custom Solutions Fund L.P. 

 Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036 or fax to
866-428-9026. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212-296-6808 or contact Jack Yuen at 212-296-1320. 

Very truly yours, 
  

	
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
	
	 By: /s/ Patrick T. Egan

	Patrick T. Egan
	President and Director
	
	ALTIS PARTNERS (JERSEY) LIMITED
	
	By: /s/ Alex Brunwin /s/ N. Reeve - Gray
	
	Print Name: ALEX BRUNWIN N. REEVE - GRAY
	
	 PE/kg
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6 378

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ROBERT BENTON, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Cameron McGowan Currie , Senior District Judge. ( 4:97

- cr
- 00866

- CMC

- 1 )

Submitted : August 31, 2018 Decided: September 19, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Robert Benton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Benton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denyi ng his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Benton , No. 4:97

- cr
- 00866

- CMC

- 1 ( D.S.C. Feb. 1, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 29, 2024

NO. 03

- 24

- 00099

- CV

In re Commitment of Melvin Lee Allen

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on November 29, 2023

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. Because

appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
From: Philip Schwartz/DC/USEPA/US To: Alexander Cristofaro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nicole Owens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lesley Schaaff/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Eileen Pritchard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Mariana Cubeddu/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Adams/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Mary Henigin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Ruthw Morgan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Deborah Banks/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 02/19/2011 10:57 AM Subject: Submitted to OMB: The Utility Toxics rule was Uploaded to ROCIS this Morning
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0608

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KAYLA DAWN PENNINGTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 11, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 6 2021

07/06/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0608
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 543

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the

construction of a hydroelectric project in Oregon, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 13 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. HATFIELD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of a hydroelectric project in Oregon, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR BLUE RIVER

4 PROJECT.

5 (a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding the time period

6 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16

7 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En8 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 3109, the

9 Commission shall, at the request of the licensee for the
2

•S 543 IS

1 project, extend the time for completion of the construction

2 of the project to the later of—

3 (1) October 31, 2002; or

4 (2) the date that is 1 year after the date on

5 which the Army Corps of Engineers completes con6 struction of water temperature control structures at

7 the Blue River Dam.

8 (b) REPORTS.—The licensee for the project described

9 in subsection (a) shall file with the Federal Energy Regu10 latory Commission, on October 31 of each year until con11 struction of the project is completed, a report on progress

12 toward completion of the project and of water temperature

13 control structures at the Blue River Dam.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         381,685
<SECURITIES>                                 2,180,456
<RECEIVABLES>                                  548,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,219,348
<PP&E>                                          98,363
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,259,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,028,437
<BONDS>                                        464,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           696
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,084,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,259,048
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,757,241
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,555,467
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                168,097
<INCOME-TAX>                                    68,079
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46


</TABLE>
Exhibit










December 31, 2016


Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear John:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2017.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgment and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.
 	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ John Buckley
	 

	John Buckley
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 655

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel MARANTHA.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 30 (legislative day, MARCH 27), 1995

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for

the vessel MARANTHA.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the
2

S 655 IS

1 coastwise trade for the vessel MARANTHA (United

2 States official number 638787).

Æ
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Bondy Tan, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Lightscape Technologies Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Lightscape
      Technologies Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Lightscape Technologies Inc.                                                                  

Dated: August 14, 2007

| | /s/ Bondy Tan                             
| | ------------------------------------------
| | Bondy Tan                                 
| | President and Chief Executive Officer     
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal   
| | Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
| | Officer)                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lightscape
Technologies Inc. and will be retained by Lightscape Technologies Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3049

___________ Efrain Angel Garcia, * * Petitioner, * Petition for Review of an

* Order of the Immigration v. * and Naturalization Service. * Immigration and Naturalization * [UNPUBLISHED] Service, * * Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: March 19, 2001

Filed: March 19, 2001

___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Efrain Angel Garcia petitions for review of a final order of the Board of ImmigrationAppeals (BIA) dismissing as untimely his appeal from the Immigration J udge's (IJ's) denial of his applications for asylum, suspension, and withholding of deportation. We dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. Garcia's appeal of the IJ's February 3, 1998 decision was due on or before March 5, thirty days after the decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.38(b) (1997). Garcia submitted his-2-

notice of appeal to the BIA on March 2, but the notice was rejected due to filing defects. The BIA's rejection notice indicated Garcia had until March 20 to file a corrected notice of appeal but he did not file it until March 25, well after both the thirty-day period provided in the regulations and the rejection notice's fifteen-day extension. The notice of appeal was thus untimely.
We also reject any argument that the untimeliness should be excused under the "unique circumstances" doctrine. See Atiqullahv. INS , 39 F.3d 896, 898 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam) (generally time limit for filing notice of appeal to BIA is mandatory and jurisdictional; in unique circumstances if party is misled by words or conduct of court, appellate tribunal may have jurisdiction to hear otherwise untimely appeal). As the BIA lacked jurisdiction to hear Garcia's appeal, we may not review the merits of his petition. See Margalli-Olvera v. INS , 43 F.3d 345, 350 (8th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Douglas B. Bennett, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Mark Nooth, 

Respondent. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

AUG 1 0 2010 

Clerk us Df 

CourtS tor the ~f~~~:t oBtanckr/uPfCY 

o umbla 

10 1344 

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, has submitted an application for a writ of habeas corpus 

along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to 

proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. 

Petitioner is an Oregon state prisoner in Ontario, Oregon, challenging a conviction 

entered by a county court in Portland, Oregon. Pet. at 2. Federal court review of state 

convictions is available under 28 U.S.c. § 2254 only after the exhaustion of available state 

remedies. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(I). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of habeas corpus [] 

made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a State court ... may be filed in 

the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the district court for the 

district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced [petitioner] and 

each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the application." 28 

U.S.C. § 2241(d). Petitioner has no recourse here. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies 

this Memorandum Opinion. 

United States Distn t Judge 

Date: August 4-,2010
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 83 ) ll-K - (B ) -7 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:51 AM Sheet 83 of 325P. 2
II-K-(B)-7 1

REVISE D ENERGYSCENARI O FO R IFCAM . Lette r fro

m E . Medine , EEA

t o R . Short , EPArSASD . Apri l 20 , 1981 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M 

# 7

II-K-(B)-7 1