alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending August 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, George Mainas, the Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: October 24, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    GEORGE MAINAS   
|                       |  |  |  | George Mainas          
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Name      of Entity                         | State      of Organization |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|  Merisel      Americas, Inc.      |  Delaware             |
|  Merisel      Properties, Inc.    |  Delaware             |
|  Color      Edge LLC              |  Delaware             |
|  Color      Edge Visual LLC       |  Delaware             |
|  Comp      24 LLC                 |  Delaware             |
|  Crush      Creative LLC          |  Delaware             |
|  Dennis      Curtin Studios, LLC  |  Delaware             |
|  MADP,      LLC                   |  Delaware             |
|  Advertising      Props, Inc.     |  Georgia              |
|  Fuel      Digital, LLC           |  Delaware             |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 510 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 510

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend the authorization for certain programs under the Native 
         American Programs Act of 1974, and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATIONS OF CERTAIN APPROPRIATIONS UNDER THE NATIVE 
              AMERICAN PROGRAMS ACT OF 1974.

    (a) Section 816.--Section 816 of the Native American Programs Act 
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 2992d) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``for fiscal years 1992, 
        1993, 1994, and 1995.'' and inserting ``for each of fiscal 
        years 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999.'';
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``for each of the fiscal 
        years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, and 1996,'' and inserting ``for 
        each of fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999,''; and
            (3) in subsection (e), by striking ``$2,000,000 for fiscal 
        year 1993 and such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 
        1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997.'' and inserting ``such sums as may 
        be necessary for each of fiscal years 1996, 1997, 1998, and 
        1999.''.
    (b) Section 803A(f)(1).--Section 803A(f)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
2991b-1(f)(1)) is amended by striking ``for each of the fiscal years 
1992, 1993, and 1994, $1,000,000'' and inserting ``such sums as may be 
necessary for each of fiscal years 1996 through 1999,''.
            Passed the Senate May 11 (legislative day, May 1), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 510

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To extend the authorization for certain programs under the Native 
         American Programs Act of 1974, and for other purposes.
```
<PAGE> 1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


Below each General Partner's name is a list of the limited partnerships, other
than the Registrant, for which the General Partner serves as a general partner
and the companies for which the General Partner serves as a director.  The list
includes only those limited partnerships and companies which have a class of
securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 or are subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Act.


Gregory J. Nooney, Jr.
----------------------

Limited Partnerships:

    Nooney Real Property Investors-Two, L.P.   Nooney Income Fund Ltd. II, L.P.
    Nooney Real Property Investors-Four, L.P.

Directorships:

    Nooney Realty Trust, Inc.


John J. Nooney
--------------

Limited Partnerships:

    Nooney Real Property Investors-Two, L.P.   Nooney Income Fund Ltd. II, L.P.
    Nooney Real Property Investors-Four, L.P.
Exhibit 10.148
                                 --------------



                                       AB

                      Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc.
                        150 East 58th Street, Suite 3238
                               New York, NY 10155
                Telephone (212)-308-5800 Facsimile (212)-753-0731
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Delivered via facsimile 914-395-0059 and US Mail

Friday, April 9, 2004

Samuel Levinson
The Shaar Fund Ltd.
Managing Director
c/o Levinson Capital Management
350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2210
New York, NY  10018

Sam:

Accrued dividends on the Series E Convertible Preferred Stock up to an amount of
$300,000  ("Specified  Series E  Dividends")  are to be  forgiven  to  Commodore
Applied  Technologies,  Inc (the  "Company").  The Specified  Series E Dividends
relate to  accrued  dividends  on  currently  unconverted  Series E  Convertible
Preferred Stock and shall not be  attributable  to the accrued  dividends on any
future  Series E  Convertible  Preferred  Stock  converted,  unless  this is not
possible,  in which case such Specified  Series E Dividends  shall relate to the
accrued dividends of the latest Series E Convertible  Preferred Stock converted.
The Company in turn will transfer the dollar  amount of the  Specified  Series E
Dividends to Milford Capital & Management ("Milford") as part of the forbearance
fee as outlined in the attached  forbearance  agreement  between Milford and the
Company ( "Milford Forbearance 2004").

                   [Balance of page intentionally left blank]

<PAGE>

Please  acknowledge the forgiveness of the Specified  Series E Dividends and the
Company's right to transfer the dollar value of the Specified Series E Dividends
to Milford in accordance with the Milford Forbearance 2004.


Acknowledged and Accepted by:



----------------------------
The Shaar Fund, Ltd.
c/o Levinson Capital Management
/s/ Samuel Levinson, Managing Director

Date: February 10, 2004
      -----------------


----------------------------------
Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc.
/s/  James DeAngelis, CFO & Treasurer


Date: February 10, 2004
      -----------------

Regards,

COMMODORE APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
1

James M. DeAngelis
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer

Cc:      Shelby T. Brewer


Enclosures:       Milford Capital & Management Forbearance Agreement
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of
Trinity Place Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 1, 2014 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew Messinger, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Matthew Messinger                 | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Matthew Messinger                     | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|Trinity Place Holdings Inc.           | 
|June 30, 2014                         |
#### Willie FIKE v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 24, 1957.

Earl F. Ashcraft, Ezart F. Ashcraft, Irvine, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., William F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for appeal from a judgment of the Estill County Circuit Court, Hon. S. H. Rice, Judge.

Appellant, Willie Fike, was convicted on the charge of possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in dry local option territory and was fined $100 and sentenced to 30 days’ confinement in jail

We have concluded that the search warrant and supporting affidavit were sufficient and that the court committed no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of appellant during the trial of this case.

The motion for appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
Order entered January 2, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01452-CV

No. 05-18-01453-CV

IN THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF B.J.

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. MI-18-03203 and MED-18-80461

ORDER

These appeals involve an order of involuntary civil commitment of appellant and an order 

to administer psychoactive medication to appellant. We ORDER appellant to file her briefs in 

these appeals by January 14, 2019.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
DENY; Opinion Filed February 28, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 20
- 00255
- CV IN RE MARCEL L. WILL IAMS , Relator Original Proceeding from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F16
- 42251
- U MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Osborne, and Justice Reichek

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns Marcel L. Willi a ms filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining that court reporter Sasha Brooks has not filed the reporter’s record in Mr. Williams’ direct appeal (appellate cause #05

- 19

- 010 2 2

- CR) , despite the Court’s order instructing Ms. Brooks to do so. We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus to a court reporter or the district clerk unless they are interfering with our appellate jurisdiction. See T EX
. G OV ’ T
. C ODE
. A NN
. §§ 22.221(a) , ( b) ; In re Strickhausen , 994 S.W.2d 936 , 936 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (no authority to issue writ of mandamus to court reporter or district clerk unless they are– 2

–

interfering with appellate court’s appellate jurisdiction.); Lesikar v. Anthony , 750 S.W.2d 338, 339 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, orig. proceeding) (same)

. We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

2002 55 F

. P 05 /Robert D. Burns, III/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      /s/ Michael R. RodriguezMichael R. RodriguezSenior Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Co-Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)**

 

The undersigned certify pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigned’s knowledge:

 

1.                                       The accompanying Annual Report ofNVE Corporation (the”Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: May 22, 2006

 

 
| /s/ DANIEL A.  BAKER                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Daniel A. Baker                        |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

 
| /s/ CURT A.  REYNDERS    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Curt A. Reynders         |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 253

To repeal certain prohibitions against political recommendations relating to

Federal employment, to reenact certain provisions relating to recommendations by Members of Congress, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 20 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To repeal certain prohibitions against political recommendations relating to Federal employment, to reenact certain

provisions relating to recommendations by Members of

Congress, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITIONS AGAINST POLITICAL REC4 OMMENDATIONS RELATING TO FEDERAL EM5 PLOYMENT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3303 of title 5, United

7 States Code, is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 253 IS

1 ‘‘§ 3303. Competitive service; recommendations of

2 Senators or Representatives

3 ‘‘An individual concerned in examining an applicant

4 for or appointing him in the competitive service may not

5 receive or consider a recommendation of the applicant by

6 a Senator or Representative, except as to the character

7 or residence of the applicant.’’.

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

9 (1) The table of sections for chapter 33 of title 5, United

10 States Code, is amended by amending the item relating

11 to section 3303 to read as follows:

‘‘3303. competitive service; recommendations of Senators or Representatives.’’.

12 (2) Section 2302(b)(2) of title 5, United States Code,

13 is amended to read as follows:

14 ‘‘(2) solicit or consider any recommendation or

15 statement, oral or written, with respect to any indi16 vidual who requests or is under consideration for

17 any personnel action unless such recommendation or

18 statement is based on the personal knowledge or

19 records of the person furnishing it and consists of—

20 ‘‘(A) an evaluation of the work perform21 ance, ability, aptitude, or general qualifications

22 of such individual; or

23 ‘‘(B) an evaluation of the character, loy24 alty, or suitability of such individual;’’.
3

•S 253 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect 30

2 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>


32.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
        of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
        Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Apogee
Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007

                                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                                      ----------------------
                                                      Michael Anthony
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                                      ----------------------
                                                      Michael Anthony
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 561

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel ISABELLE, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1995

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

ISABELLE, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 App. U.S.C.

7 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code,

8 the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of
2

•S 561 IS

1 documentation with appropriate endorsement for employ2 ment in the coastwise trade for the vessel ISABELLE,

3 United States official number 600655.

Æ
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JAMES JORDAN
, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )

v. ) Civil Action No. 23

- 002 5 (UNA) ) TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT, ) ) Defendant )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the court on its initial review of plaintiff’s application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis , ECF No. 2, and pro se complaint, ECF No. 1. The Court will grant

the in forma pauperis application and dismiss the complaint without p rejudice pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), by which the Court must dismiss a case “at any time” if it determines

that the action is frivolous.
According to plaintiff, he is subjected to a “psychological warfare system,” and the FBI

“is using cyber attacks” and “fraud” when ever plaintiff attempt ed to schedule appointments with

medical specialists. Compl., Ex. (ECF No. 1

- 1) at 10 (page numbers des ignated by CM/ECF).

Plaintiff attributes to defendant various malfunctions of his vehicle, to include lights “blink[ing]

from the inside” and an engine that “would stall.” Id. at 11

- 12. For these and other alleged
“illegal acts by Tucson Police Plaintif f seeks judgment of 10 million” dollars. Id. at 12

. “A complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to

relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell

Atl. Corp. v . Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A complaint that lacks “an arguable basis

either in law or in fact” is frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams , 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). On review2

of the complaint, the Court concludes that its factual allegations are incoh erent, irrational or

wholly incredible, rendering the complaint subject to dismissal as frivolous
, s ee Denton v.

Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992) (“[A] finding of factual frivolousness is appropriate when the

facts alleged rise to the level of the irratio nal or the wholly incredible[.]”), and the Court cannot

exercise subject matter jurisdiction over a frivolous complaint, Hagans v. Lavine , 415 U.S. 528,

536

- 37 (1974) (“Over the years, this Court has repeatedly held that the federal courts are without

powe r to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are ‘so attenuated and

unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit.’”) (quoting Newburyport Water Co. v.

Newburyport , 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904)); Tooley v. Napolitano , 586 F.3d 1006, 10 10 (D.C. Cir.
2009) (examining cases dismissed “for patent insubstantiality”).

A separate order will issue.

DATE: January 19, 2023 /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER United States District Judge
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20985 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus ANDRES GARCIA, also known as Adres Gamaz, also known as Nestor Hugo Arbalaez, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-94-101-10
- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Andres Garcia appeals his sentence following conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. He argues that the district court erred in refusing to grant him a downward departure based on his family’s financial circumstances and in refusing to grant him a four-level Sentencing Guidelines reduction for his role as “minimal” participant in the offense. This court lacksNo. 95-20985 -2- jurisdiction to address Garcia’s challenge to the district court’s refusal to enter a downward departure. United States v. DiMarco , 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Burleson , 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir.), cert . denied , 115 S. Ct. 283 (1994). The district court’s finding that Garcia was not a “minimal” participant was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Zuniga , 18 F.3d 1254, 1261 (5th Cir.), cert . denied , 115 S. Ct. 214 (1994); U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b) & comment, (n.2). AFFIRMED.