alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered December 21, 2018 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01516-CV 

IN RE AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-05893 

ORDER 

Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Schenck 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. 

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

 JUSTICE
1 The Honorable David L. Piester, United States Magistrate Judge for the District

of Nebraska, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-4169NE

_____________ Marlin E. Jones, * * On Appeal from the United Appellant, * States District Court * for the District of v. * Nebraska. * Ideal Linen Supply, * [Not to be Published] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 3, 1999 Filed: September 15, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
MarlinJones appeals from the District Court’s 1 order denying his motion to set aside the verdict reached after a jury trial on his claim of age discrimination. After careful review of the record and the parties’ submissions, we conclude that the District Court properly treated the motion as one for a new trial, see Brownv. Royalty , 535 F.2d1024, 1028 (8th Cir. 1976), and did not abuse its discretion in denying the-2-

motion. Jones never specified how his counsel’s alleged misconduct prejudiced his case, see Hofer

v. Mack Trucks, Inc. , 981 F.2d 377, 385 (8th Cir. 1992) (misconduct is prejudicial if it affects movant’s substantial rights or unduly taints proceedings); Dabney v. Montgomery Ward & Co. , 761 F.2d 494, 500 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 904 (1985). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.5



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of WTA Inc. (the Company), hereby
certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  | WTA INC.
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 11, 2003 |  |  |  |         
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  |         
|                       |  |  |  |         
|                       |  |  |  |         



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SCPIE HOLDINGS INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           668,367
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      19,977
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 717,910
<CASH>                                           4,212
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 805,155
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                459,567
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             25,297
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   7,723
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     288,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   805,155
<PREMIUMS>                                     120,484
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             40,769
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              11,738
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     375
<BENEFITS>                                     108,797
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            14,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,665
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 446,627
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            168,545
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               59,748
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              13,274
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               101,849
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                440,301
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                         59,748
        

</TABLE>
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 13, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D21-1993 & 3D22-150

Lower Tribunal No. F97-27689

________________

Melton Jackson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

Appeals under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Joseph Perkins, Judge.

Melton Jackson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.5

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT

TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Igor Gonda, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Aradigm Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2015; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Igor GondaIgor GondaPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 16, 2016
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto Gil CORONA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-8018.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 20, 2002.

Decided Feb. 3, 2003.

Roberto Gil Corona, Appellant Pro Se. Rebeca Hidalgo Bellows, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

*189Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Roberto Gil Corona seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal based upon the district court’s reasoning that *Apprendi v. New*Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is not retroactively applicable on collateral review under *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 1032, 122 S.Ct. 573, 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001). *See United States v. Corona,*Nos. CR-99-307; CA-01-1421 (D.Md. Sept. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 30, 2008



/s/ DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. PasseriPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

         The  undersigned  constitutes  and  appoints  Jon Ehlinger his true and
lawful   attorney-in-fact   and  agent  with  full  power  of  substitution  and
resubstitution,  for him  and in his  name,  place,  and  stead,  in any and all
capacities,  to sign the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
December 31, 1999,  for filing with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission by
Ugly Duckling  Corporation,  a Delaware  corporation,  together with any and all
amendments  to such Form 10-K,  and to file the same with all exhibits  thereto,
and all  documents in connection  therewith,  with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission,  granting to such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them,
full  power  and  authority  to do and  perform  each and  every  act and  thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming  all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         DATED:   February 11, 2000


          /S/ ERNEST C. GARCIA II
          -----------------------
          Ernest C. Garcia II
March 28, 2014

Mr. Brian E. Foont Counsel for Mesa Airlines, Inc. The Foont Law Firm, LLC 11909 Reynolds Avenue Potomac, MD 20854

Dear Mr. Foont:

This is in response to your September 30, 2013, letter sent to the public docket (Docket No. FAA-2013-0135) petitioning the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Mesa Airlines, Inc. (Mesa) for an extension to its exemption from § 121.803(c)(3) and Appendix A of part 121 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would continue to provide Mesa relief from the requirement to include Atropine in an Emergency Medical Kit (EMK).

Your exemption request is now covered under Exemption No. 10690C (copy enclosed) in Docket No. FAA-2013-0034. In that action, the FAA amended the Airlines for America, Regional Airlines Association, and National Ai r Carriers Association exemption to include all similarly-situated air carriers.

Because the relief you seek is now covered under Exemption No. 10690C, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jodi L. Baker Deputy Division Manager, Air Transportation Division

Enclosure
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

I, Douglas P. Buth, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Appleton Papers Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 7, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2158 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2158

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
             To set the time for counting electoral votes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    In carrying out the procedure set forth in section 15 of title 3, 
United States Code, for 1997, ``the 9th day of January'' shall be 
substituted for ``the sixth day of January'' in the first sentence of 
such section.

            Passed the Senate September 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2158

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

             To set the time for counting electoral votes.
```
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A1 27 1 . J ONATHAN J ERMAI NE SERCHI ON v

. THE STATE.

J o n at h an Jerm ai n e Serch i o n, act in g p ro s e, fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r o u t -o f-t i m e
ap p eal
, co n t en d i n g th at h i s tri al co u n s el fai l ed t o ad v i s e h im ab ou t h i s ri g h t to ap p eal

. Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed th i s m o t i o n becau s e t h e s am e i s s u e h ad al read y b een d eci d ed
i n a p rev i o us h ab eas co rp u s act i o n . Serch io n t h ereaft er fi l ed t hi s ap p eal

. In Co o k v. S t a t e , t h e Su prem e Co u rt d et erm i n ed t h at a t ri al co u rt lack s au t h o ri t y
t o gran t an o u t

- o f

- t i m e ap peal

. Co o k v. S t a t e ,

_ __ Ga.

_ __ ,

_ _ _ (5 ) (Cas e No

. S2 1 A1 27 0
, d eci d ed M a r ch 15
, 2 0 2 2 ). Serch i o n , t herefo re, “ h ad n o ri g h t t o fi l e a

m o ti o n fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal i n th e t ri al co urt ; h i s rem ed y , i f an y , li es i n h ab eas

co rp u s [,] ” R u t led

g e v. S t a te ,

_

_ _ Ga.

_ _ _ ,

_ __ (Cas e No

. S2 1 A1 0 3 6
, d eci d ed M arch
1 5
, 2 0 2 2 ). It ap p ears t h at Serch i o n has al read y pu rs u ed t h i s rem ed y

. No n et h el es s , rat h er t h an d en y i n g Serch i o n ’ s m o t i o n on t h es e g ro u n ds
, t h e t ri al co u rt s h o u l d h av e d i s m i s s e d i t

. See i d

. A cco rd i n g l y , th e tri al co u rt ’ s o rd er den y i n g t h e m o t i o n fo r

o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal i s h ereb y VACATED an d t h i s ap peal i s h ereb y REM ANDED to

t h e t ri al co u rt , wh i ch i s DIRECTED t o en t er an o rd er d i s m is s in g t h e m o t i o n fo r

o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. April 13, 2022C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/13/2022
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 281

To amend title 38, United States Code, to change the date for the beginning

of the Vietnam era for the purpose of veterans benefits from August

5, 1964, to December 22, 1961.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. D’AMATO (for himself and Mr. MOYNIHAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to change the date

for the beginning of the Vietnam era for the purpose

of veterans benefits from August 5, 1964, to December

22, 1961.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 101(29) of title 38, United States Code, is

4 amended by striking out ‘‘August 5, 1964’’ and inserting

5 in lieu thereof ‘‘December 22, 1961’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert O. Carr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

This certificationis being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever. 

Date: November 7, 2008
Exhibit 23.1

                               Consent of KPMG LLP
<PAGE>




The Board of Directors 
CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statement  (No.
333-31229) on Form S-8 of CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. of our report dated
January 29, 1999, except as to note 13, which is as of March 19, 1999,  relating
to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of  CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. and
subsidiary  as of  December  31,  1997 and 1998,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each
of the years in the  three-year  period ended  December 31, 1998 and the related
schedule,  which report appears in the December 31, 1998,  Annual Report on Form
10-K of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP



Princeton, New Jersey
March 23, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 369 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 170
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 369

    To designate the Federal Courthouse in Decatur, Alabama, as the 
   ``Seybourn H. Lynne Federal Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 8 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

Mr. Heflin (for himself and Mr. Shelby) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

               August 7 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To designate the Federal Courthouse in Decatur, Alabama, as the 
   ``Seybourn H. Lynne Federal Courthouse'', and for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Courthouse in Decatur, Alabama, is designated as the 
``Seybourn H. Lynne Federal Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the building referred to in section 
1 is deemed to be a reference to the Seybourn H. Lynne Federal 
Courthouse.
                                     
                                                       Calendar No. 170

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 369

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To designate the Federal Courthouse in Decatur, Alabama, as the 
   ``Seybourn H. Lynne Federal Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

               August 7 (legislative day, July 10), 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```