alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer ofSMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 4, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 4,2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: November 12, 2009 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTCCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shelby T. Brewer, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc..







/s/ Shelby T. Brewer

DATE:  April 15, 2009

Shelby T. Brewer, Chief Executive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion issued May 16, 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 2 3
- 00 350
- CV

——————————— IN RE PLATINUM II , LLC , Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Platinum II, LLC , filed a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s January 18, 2023 “Order Denying [Relator’s] Motion for Leave to Designate [John Nau and Nau Capital, LLC as] Responsible Third

- Parties

. ” 1 Relator further arg ue d that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to rule on two other

1 The underlying case is Kerry Fritz v. Platinum II, LLC and Standard Constructors, Inc. , Cause No. 2022

- 32347 , in the 333rd District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Brittanye Morris presiding.2

motions to designate responsible third parties, including (1) relator’s “ Motion to Designate [ Riviera Australia Pty Ltd as a] Responsible Third Party, ” filed on January 5, 2023 and set on the trial court’s March 27, 2023 submission docket, and (2) relator’s “ Motion to Designate Seabrook Harbor & Marine, LLC as Responsible Third Party, ” filed on April 6, 2023 and set on the trial court’s April 24, 2023

su bmission docket. In connection with its mandamus petition, relator also filed an “Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Review,” requesting that this Court “enter an order staying the underlying suit pending a decision” on the mandamus petition. Relator stat e d
that the stay is necessary to prevent trial of the underlying litigation , currently set on the trial court’s trial docket beginning July 10, 2023 , from moving forward until the Court has considered its mandamus petition. Our review of relator’s mandamus petition reflects that relator has failed to establish that it is entitled to mandamus relief. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7, 52.8; see also Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992). Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a). A ll pending motions , including relator’s “Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Review,” are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris

.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Bear Staffing, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 949 C.D. 2020

:

Shawn Logan (Workers' :

Compensation Appeal Board), :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, December 6, 2021, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

application for reargument, the application is denied.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

I, Douglas P. Buth, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Paperweight Development Corp., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 7, 2003
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.119

                          SCHEDULE OF LOAN AGREEMENTS,
              PROMISSORY NOTES, AND GUARANTIES ("LOAN DOCUMENTS")
       WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF KEY CORPORATE CAPITAL, INC.
      LOAN DOCUMENTS ATTACHED AS EXHIBITS 10.116, 10.117 AND 10.118 TO THE
               COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 12/31/99

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            MORTGAGOR                       FACILITY NAME                         LOCATION               MORTGAGE       DATE OF
            ---------                       -------------                         --------               --------       -------
                                                                                                          AMOUNT        MORTGAGE
                                                                                                          ------        --------
<S>                              <C>                                       <C>                          <C>             <C>
   Ithaca Bundy Road, LLC        Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of Ithaca    101 Bundy Road               $3,325,800      3/17/99
                                                                           Ithaca, NY  14850-9252

   Ithaca Trumansburg Road, LLC  Alterra Sterling House of Ithaca          103 Bundy Road               $2,862,608      3/17/99
                                                                           Ithaca, NY  14850-9252

   Niagara Nash Road, LLC        Alterra Sterling House of Niagara         6751 Nash Road               $3,420,000      10/20/99
                                                                           North Tonawanda, NY  14120

   Niagara SC Wheatfield, LLC    Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of Niagara   6741 Nash Road               $3,367,010      10/20/99
                                                                           North Tonawanda, NY  14120

   Clinton Brookside Drive, LLC  Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of Clinton   115 Brookside Drive          $3,300,000      1/14/00
                                                                           Clinton, NY  13323
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 62 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 62

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 
  restriction that a clinical psychologist or clinical social worker 
provide services in a comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility 
    to a patient only under the care of a physician, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 
  restriction that a clinical psychologist or clinical social worker 
provide services in a comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility 
    to a patient only under the care of a physician, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION THAT A CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST OR 
              CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER PROVIDE SERVICES IN A 
              COMPREHENSIVE OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION FACILITY TO A 
              PATIENT ONLY UNDER THE CARE OF A PHYSICIAN.

    (a) In General.--Section 1861(cc)(2)(E) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395x(cc)(2)(E)) is amended by inserting before the 
semicolon ``(except with respect to services provided by a clinical 
psychologist or a clinical social worker)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
become effective with respect to services provided on or after January 
1, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 5, 2014

t0129

Order 

Clerk

February 5, 2014

147810

KENNETH A. COSTELLA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147810

COA: 310276 

Wayne CC: 11-015152-AS

TAYLOR POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT

SYSTEM,

Defendant-Appellant, 

and

CITY OF TAYLOR,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

we REINSTATE the March 26, 2012 order of the Wayne Circuit Court granting the 

defendants’ motions for summary disposition, for the reasons stated in the Court of 

Appeals dissenting opinion. In particular, the circuit court did not clearly err in 

concluding that defendant Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System’s final decision 

regarding the plaintiff’s pension benefits was not contrary to law, was not arbitrary, 

capricious, or a clear abuse of discretion, and was supported by competent, material and 

substantial evidence on the whole record. See VanZandt v State Employees’ Retirement 

Sys, 266 Mich App 579, 583-585 (2005).
Exhibit 10.28


 


SECOND AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made effective this 5th day of January, 2017 (the “Effective
Date”), by and between SAJAN, INC., a Delaware corporation having its principal executive offices in the State of Wisconsin
(the “Company”), and SHANNON ZIMMERMAN, an individual resident of the State of Wisconsin (the “Employee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the parties entered
into a written agreement governing Employee’s employment with the Company on May 19, 2006, as amended by that First Amendment
to Employment Agreement dated February 1, 2010 (collectively, the “Agreement”), pursuant to which the Employee
is entitled to a certain severance package if the Employee’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company without
Cause (as such term is defined in the Agreement) or by the Employee pursuant to Section 5.2 of the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and
the Employee desire to amend Section 6.4 of the Agreement to add one year of Company-funded health-insurance coverage not to exceed
$5,000 for the annual period to the Employee’s severance package;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual promises and provisions contained in this Amendment, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:


 


AGREEMENT


 


1.           Terms
of Employment. The parties agree that the terms of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect, except as set forth
in this Amendment.


 


2.           Severance
Payment. Section 6.4 of the Agreement will be replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“6.4        By
the Company Without Cause or by the Employee for the Company’s Breach.


 


(a)          Severance.
If (a) the Company terminates the Employee’s employment without Cause, or (b) the Employee properly terminates employment
pursuant to Section 5.2, the Employee will be entitled to continuing payments of the Employee’s Base Salary for twelve (12)
months following the Date of Termination (such payment, the “Severance Payment”) (to be paid in monthly or other
installments in accordance with the general practice of the Company from time to time).


 


(b)          In
addition to the Severance Payment, the Employee shall be entitled to receive one year of Company-funded health insurance coverage
not to exceed $5,000 for the annual period, as well as all other unpaid amounts, if any, to which Employee is entitled under this
Agreement under any compensation plan or program of the Company, at the time such payments are due (such payments pursuant to Section
6.4(a) and this Section 6.4(b), the “Severance Payments”).


 


[Signature page follows.]


 




    	 	1	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have executed and delivered this Second Amendment to Employment Agreement on the day and year first written above.


 


	 	SAJAN, INC.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Thomas P. Skiba
	 	By: Thomas P. Skiba
	 	Its: CFO
	 	 
	 	/s/ Shannon
    Zimmerman
	 	Shannon Zimmerman,
    an Individual


 


Signature Page to Second Amendment to Employment
Agreement
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of B2Digital, Inc., (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Russell, Chief
Executive Officer and Marcia Pearlstein, Interim Chief Financial Officer, of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/  Robert Russell
                                        -------------------------------------
                                             Robert Russell
                                             Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/  Marcia Pearlstein
                                        -------------------------------------
                                             Marcia Pearlstein
                                             Interim Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  August 9, 2005

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.


                                       46
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

February 3, 2015

No. 12-3343

MINIKAN WRETH JOHNSON,

 Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Respondent

(Agency No. 079-925-413)

Present: HARDIMAN, SCIRICA and ROTH, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Respondent to Clarify or Amend Decision of December 17, 2014.

2. Response in Opposition by Petitioner to Motion to Clarify or Amend Decision 

of December 17, 2014. 

Respectfully,

Clerk/tmm

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion to clarify or amend the decision of December 17, 2014 is granted. 

Upon further review, the Court will issue an amended opinion. The amended opinion 

does not affect the entry of judgment.

By the Court,

s/Anthony J. Scirica

Circuit Judge

Dated: June 16, 2015 

tmm/cc: Herbert C. Shelley, Esq.

Jessica L. Urban, Esq.

Jeffrey Bernstein, Esq.

Margaret A. O’Donnell, Esq.

Ann C. Varnon, Esq.
EXHIBIT 31.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Maurice H. Madrid, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB/A of Sales  Strategies,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 22, 2003              /s/ Maurice H. Madrid
                                      ---------------------
                                      Maurice H. Madrid
                                      Acting Financial Officer/
                                      Director