alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 5533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01771]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Thursday, February 8, 2024.

PLACE: You may observe this meeting in person at 1501 Farm Credit 
Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to 
observe, at least 24 hours in advance, visit FCA.gov, select 
``Newsroom,'' then select ``Events.'' From there, access the linked 
``Instructions for board meeting visitors'' and complete the described 
registration process.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The following matters will be considered:

<bullet> Approval of Minutes for January 11, 2024
<bullet> Risk-Weighting of High Volatility Commercial Real Estate Final 
Rule

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: If you need more information or 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley 
Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-
4056.

Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-01771 Filed 1-25-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Exhibit 31.2I, Diane L. Walker, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of LSB Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation and;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and theAudit Committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: May 11, 2007                                                            /s/ Diane L. Walker   Diane L. Walker   Executive Vice President, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2198

To provide for the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations to

continue in existence, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. STEVENS (for himself and Mr. MOYNIHAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To provide for the Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations to continue in existence, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. (a) Notwithstanding the provision under

4 the heading ‘‘ADVISORY COMMISSION ON INTERGOVERN5 MENTAL RELATIONS’’ under title IV of the Treasury, Post6 al Service, and General Government Appropriations Act,

7 1996 (Public Law 104–52; 109 Stat. 480), the Advisory

8 Commission on Intergovernmental Relations may continue

9 in existence solely for the purpose of performing any con10 tract entered into under section 7(a) of the National Gam-
2

S 2198 CPS

1 bling Impact Study Commission Act (Public Law 104–

2 169; 110 Stat. 1487). The Advisory Commission on Inter3 governmental Relations shall terminate on the date of the

4 completion of such contract.

5 (b) The Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental

6 Relations and employees of the Commission who are con7 sidered to be Federal employees under section 6(e) of Pub8 lic Law 96–380 (42 U.S.C. 4276(e)) shall make contribu9 tions to and participate in Federal health insurance, life

10 insurance, and retirement programs to the same extent

11 and in the same manner as before the date of enactment

12 of this section. The Commission shall make any such con13 tributions from funds received through contracts.

14 SEC. 2. Section 615 of the Departments of Com15 merce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related

16 Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997 (contained in Pub. L.

17 No. 104–208) is amended by deleting ‘‘and Community

18 Oriented Policing Services Program’’ and by deleting ‘‘and

19 part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe

20 Streets Act of 1968’’. The amendments made by this sec21 tion shall take effect upon enactment.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          66,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,736
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,875
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,809
<PP&E>                                       2,570,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                 553,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,817,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,722
<BONDS>                                      1,423,216
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,893
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,012,113
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,817,999
<SALES>                                        344,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               344,098
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  253,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,489
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,489
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
SERVED: FEBRUARY 4, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

In The Matter Of: 

AVIATION ENGINEERING 

CONSULT ANTS, INC. 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC t:l!i ,, - Ci Ci: t,_ s 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. F AA-20 13;,0284 

Case No. 2012CE440003 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On January 14,2014, an Order Granting Unopposed Motion to Continue was filed. This 

Order continued the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference until February 12, 2014, at 11:00 

a.m. Eastern time and set February 5, 2014, as the deadline for filing a Rule 26(±) Joint 

Scheduling/Discovery Plan. _ 

On February 3, 2014, the FAA filed Complainant's Notice of Withdrawal of Amended 

Complaint stating that the matter has been resolved through the timely payment of an agreed 

civil penalty. 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.218, the Respondent's December 20, 2013 Motion to 

Withdraw as Counsel and Abate Action, which was reserved pending the filing of a 

supplemental statement, is deemed moot. 

2. The February 5, 2014 deadline for filing a Rule 26(±) Joint Scheduling/Discovery Plan 

is cancelled. 

3. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference set for February 12, 2014, at 11:00 

a.m. Eastern time is cancelled. 

4. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this 

proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

Mr. Mark G. Camacho 

Complainant's Counsel 

ONE COPY 

Senior Enforcement Attorney, Central Region, ACE-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Room 506, DOT Building, 901 Locust St. 

Kansas, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3765 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0284 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Mr. Douglas J. Barnard 

Respondent's Counsel 

Aviation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Respondent 

14695 Airport Parkway, 2nd Floor 

Clearwater, FL 33762 

TEL: 727-259-0224 

FAX: 727-259-0223 

E-MAIL: dougb@planelaw.com 

Judge lE. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

·Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

C/0 Kamran Rouhani 

2159 McMullen Booth Road 

Clearwater, FL 33759 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,091
<SECURITIES>                                    36,476
<RECEIVABLES>                                      179
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                        420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,098
<PP&E>                                           6,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,586
<BONDS>                                          6,126
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,655
<SALES>                                          2,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,409
<CGS>                                            2,507
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,507
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 523
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,866)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.37)
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date:  August 7,  2009 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT L. HOWARD-ANDERSON         |
|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                             | Name:  | Robert L. Howard-Anderson             |
|                             | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Jeanne Seeley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date:  August 7,  2009 | By:    | /s/ JEANNE SEELEY                                 |
|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Name:  | Jeanne Seeley                                     |
|                             | Title: | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will beretained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### TALASILA, INC., Plaintiff, and M.R. MIKKILINENI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-5003.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 25, 2002.

ORDER

A combined petition for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc having been filed by the APPELLANT, and the petition for rehearing having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafter the petition for rehearing en banc having been referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service,

UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, it is

ORDERED that the petition for panel rehearing be, and the same hereby is, DENIED and it is further

ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.

The mandate of the court will issue on August 1, 2002.
[J-127-2016]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SALADWORKS, LLC AND WESCO 

INSURANCE COMPANY

v.

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (GAUDIOSO AND UNINSURED 

EMPLOYERS GUARANTY FUND)

APPEAL OF: UNINSURED EMPLOYERS 

GUARANTY FUND

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 52 MAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 1789 CD 

2014 dated 10/6/15, reconsideration 

denied 11/23/15, reversing the decision of 

the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board 

at No. A12-0597 dated 9/10/14

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: December 16, 2016

The appeal is DISMISSED as having been improvidently granted.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 11-869C

(Filed: March 21, 2014)

************************************** *

*

CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO., et al., *

*

 Plaintiffs, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

 Defendant. *

*

************************************** *

ORDER AMENDING JUDGMENT

On March 19, 2014, counsel for the Plaintiffs filed a motion to alter or amend the 

Court’s March 13, 2014 Judgment that Plaintiffs recover $103,748,230.14 from the 

United States. (Dkt. No. 61). Counsel for the Government concurs with the motion. By 

agreement of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the following two adjustments.

First, in its March 10, 2014 opinion, the Court ruled that Plaintiffs’ damages claim 

of $104,991,508 should be reduced by $162,927 for indirect costs identified by the 

Government’s expert that are attributable to direct costs that had been voluntarily 

removed from the claim by Plaintiffs. (Dkt. No. 60). However, the Plaintiffs’ adjusted 

claim amount of $104,991,508 already reflected the voluntary deduction of this amount. 

The Judgment is corrected so that only one deduction is taken.

Second, the Court removed $107,452 in indirect costs from Plaintiffs’ damages 

calculation when it denied Plaintiffs’ claim for the Brunswick Computer System 

Replacement. However, the Government’s expert estimated indirect costs related to the 

computer system upgrade to be $237,877. Plaintiffs do not dispute this calculation. 

Therefore, Plaintiffs’ claim is reduced by an additional $130,425. 
- 2 -

Accordingly, the Court increases Plaintiffs’ damages award by the net difference 

of these adjustments ($162,927−$130,425 = $32,502), to $103,780,732.14. The Clerk is 

directed to enter an amended judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Thomas C. Wheeler

THOMAS C. WHEELER

Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with  the  Annual  Report of ValCom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended September  30,  2009  as  filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I,  Vincent Vellardita,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required  by  Section  906 has been
provided to ValCom, Inc. and will be retained by ValCom, Inc. and furnished  to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

February 16, 2010

   By:  /s/ Vince Vellardita
	    ----------------
     	    Vince Vellardita
     	    Chief Executive Officer,
     	    Chief Financial Officer
     	    (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Donald SCHWAB, Petitioner, v. Bobby Glen STEWART et ux., Respondents.

No. A-10709.

Supreme Court of Texas.

May 19, 1965.

Rehearing Denied June 16, 1965.

Morehead, Sharp, Boyd & Tisdel, Plain-view, for petitioner.

Splawn & Maner, Lubbock, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This is an automobile collision case in which a judgment for the plaintiff has been affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 387 S.W.2d 939. The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. If the Court of Civil Appeals meant to say that no violation of the provisions of Article 6701d, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Civil Statutes may constitute negligence per se, our action is not to be understood as approving that conclusion.
Exhibit 13.1



Compañía de Minas Buenaventura
S.A.A.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



| | 1. | I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the “Company”).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | (A)       	The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2015 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(B)        	The information in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 2, 2016



| | /s/ Roque Benavides Ganoza
| | --------------------------
| | Roque Benavides Ganoza    
| | Chief Executive Officer   





E-13.1
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-91525, 333-59253 and 333-89884) pertaining to The SCPIE Holdings Inc. Employee StockPurchase Plan and 2001 Amended and Restated Equity Participation Plan of SCPIE Holdings Inc., as amended, respectively, of our reports dated March 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of SCPIE HoldingsInc., SCPIE Holdings Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of SCPIE Holdings Inc., included in this Form 10-K/A.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

March 15, 2007
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             August 8, 2008
    
    By /s/ Shannon K S Johnson
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate
    
    Shannon K S Johnson
    
    (principal financial officer)