alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 496

To abolish the Board of Review of the Metropolitan Washington Airports

Authority, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 3 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. ROBB) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

A BILL

To abolish the Board of Review of the Metropolitan

Washington Airports Authority, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ABOLITION OF BOARD OF REVIEW AND RELAT4 ED AUTHORITY.

5 (a) ABOLITION OF BOARD OF REVIEW.—Section

6 6007 of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of

7 1986 (100 Stat. 1783–379) is amended—

8 (1) by striking subsections (f) and (h);

9 (2) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub10 section (f); and
2

S 496 IS

1 (3) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection

2 (g).

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

4 (1) RELATIONSHIP TO AND EFFECT OF OTHER

5 LAWS.—Section 6009(b) of the Metropolitan Wash6 ington Airports Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 1783–384)

7 is amended by striking ‘‘or by reason of the author8 ity’’ and all that follows through the end of the sub9 section and inserting a period.

10 (2) SEPARABILITY.—Section 6011 of the Met11 ropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986 (100

12 Stat. 1783–385) is amended by striking ‘‘Except as

13 provided in section 6007(h), if’’ and inserting ‘‘If’’.

14 (c) PROTECTION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS.—Actions

15 taken by the Airports Authority and submitted to the

16 Board of Review pursuant to section 6007(f)(4) of the

17 Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986 before

18 April 1, 1995, shall remain in effect and shall not be set

19 aside solely by reason of a judicial order invalidating cer20 tain functions of the Board of Review.

21 (d) AMENDMENT OF LEASE.—The Secretary of

22 Transportation shall amend the lease entered into with the

23 Airports Authority under section 6005(a) of the Metro24 politan Washington Airports Act of 1986 to secure the
3

S 496 IS

1 Airports Authority’s consent to the amendments made by

2 this Act.

3 SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS IN OTHER LAW.

4 Any reference in any Federal law, Executive order,

5 rule, regulation, or delegation of authority to the Board

6 of Review of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Au7 thority or the provisions of law repealed under this Act

8 is hereby repealed.

Æ
#### Benny VASQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28230.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 4, 1956.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The sale of beer in a dry area is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $500.

The record before us contains no statement of facts or bills, of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
NUMBER 13-18-00607-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

EX PARTE FABIAN GARCIA

On appeal from the 206th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER 

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was originally due on December 21, 2018. On January 17, 2019, 

current counsel made an appearance in the case and was then granted an extension of 

time to file a brief until March 21, 2019. The Court has considered several subsequent 

motions for extension, including on December 23, 2019, when appellate counsel cited a 

missing exhibit as the cause for delay. On January 6, 2020, the record was supplemented 

with the exhibit at issue and a subsequent order granting an extension with the new 
deadline on February 21, 2020. To date, the Court has yet to receive appellant’s brief. 

On March 2, 2020, the Court abated for further findings from the trial court, and on March 

18, 2020 the Court received the supplemental record containing such findings. 

The Court, having fully examined and considered the extensions previously 

granted in this cause, the supplemental record, and this Court's previous orders is of the 

opinion that the case should be reinstated, and appellant’s brief shall be due May 4, 2020.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Honorable Joseph Connors, counsel for 

appellant, file the appellate brief with this Court on or before 5:00 p.m. on May 4, 2020. 

If the Honorable Joseph Connors fails to file the appellate brief with this Court on or before 

5:00 p.m. on May 4, 2020, then the Honorable Joseph Connors is ORDERED to make 

arrangements, with the Clerk of the Court, to appear via telephone on May 5, 2020 at 

9:00 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.

The Honorable Joseph Connors is admonished, absent further exigent 

circumstances, this Court may find counsel in contempt for failing to follow its orders.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

6th day of April, 2020.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ANTONIO PEARSON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 713 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
EXHIBIT 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Guangshen Railway Company Limited

The following table lists information concerning the significant subsidiaries of Guangshen Railway Company Limited, or the Company, as of December 31, 2016:



|                                                                             |  |                         |  |                                          |       |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | ----- | -
|Name                                                                         |  | Country ofIncorporation |  | Percentage ofInterest held byour Company |      
|Dongguan Changsheng Enterprise Company Limited                               |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 51    | %
|Shenzhen Fu Yuan Enterprise Development Company Limited                      |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Pinghu Qun Yi Railway Store Loading and Unloading Company Limited   |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Nantie Construction Supervision Company Limited                     |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 76.66 | %
|Shenzhen Railway Property Management Company Limited                         |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Shenhuasheng Storage and Transportation Company Limited             |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Guangshen Railway Economic and Trade Enterprise Company Limited     |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Railway Station Passenger Services Company Limited                  |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Guangshen Railway Station Dongqun Trade and Commerce Service Company Limited |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Guangzhou Railway Huangpu Service Company Limited                            |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Zengcheng Lihua Stock Company Limited                                        |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 44.72 | %
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of ValCom, Inc. (the
Company) on Form10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Vincent Vellardita, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to ValCom, Inc. and will be retained by ValCom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




,
2011


|By: |  | /s/ Vince Vellardita Vince Vellardita Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






---
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-1473V

UNPUBLISHED

JULIE ROUBIK, personal 

representative of ESTATE OF 

THOMAS ROUBIK,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: April 16, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC, for petitioner.

Lauren Kells, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On October 27, 2020, Julie Roubik filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”), as personal representative of the estate of Thomas Roubik. Petitioner 

alleges that “[a]s a direct and proximate result of the reaction to the influenza vaccination 

administered to Thomas Roubik on November 8, 2019, he suffered from the effects of 

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) which ultimately lead to his untimely death.” Petition at ¶

16. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special 

Masters.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

On April 16, 2021, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, Respondent agrees “that [P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the 

Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”).”

Id. at 4. Respondent further agrees that “based on the medical records outlined above, a 

preponderance of evidence establishes that [P]etitioner has met the statutory severity 

requirement in that Mr. Roubik’s death was related to his GBS.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 255

To require the Secretary of the Army to carry out such activities as are

necessary to stabilize the bluffs along the Mississippi River in the vicinity

of Natchez, Mississippi, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 20 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Army to carry out such

activities as are necessary to stabilize the bluffs along

the Mississippi River in the vicinity of Natchez, Mississippi, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STABILIZATION OF NATCHEZ BLUFFS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—In accordance with the rec5 ommendations of the reports prepared by the Army Corps

6 of Engineers entitled ‘‘The Natchez Bluff Study’’, ‘‘The

7 Natchez Bluff Study: Supplement I’’, and ‘‘The Natchez

8 Bluff Study: Supplement II’’, dated September 1985,
2

•S 255 IS

1 June 1990, and December 1993, respectively, the Sec2 retary of the Army shall carry out such activities as are

3 necessary to stabilize the portions of the bluffs along the

4 Mississippi River in the vicinity of Natchez, Mississippi,

5 designated in figure 4 of the December 1993 report as—

6 (1) Clifton Avenue, area 3;

7 (2) the bluff above Natchez Under-the-Hill,

8 area 7;

9 (3) the bluff above Silver Street, area 6; and

10 (4) Madison Street to State Street, area 4.

11 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

12 are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of

13 the Army such sums as are necessary to carry out this

14 section.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-91525, 333-59253 and 333-89884) pertaining to The SCPIE Holdings Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 2001 Amended and Restated Equity Participation Plan of SCPIE Holdings Inc., as amended, respectively,of our reports dated March 12, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of SCPIE Holdings Inc., SCPIE Holdings Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of SCPIE Holdings Inc., included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

March 15, 2007
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 April 16, 2009  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 LOCAL.COM CORPORATION
  Delaware
    
    000-50989
    
    33-0849123(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 One Technology Drive, Building G
Irvine, California 92618
 (949) 784-0800
 N/A
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
   Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Exhibit 10.1(1)
    
    Amendment No. 4 to Yahoo! Publisher Network Agreement
dated April 16, 2009 by and
among the Registrant and Yahoo! Inc.
 
 (1)
    
    Application has been made with the Securities and Exchange Commission to seek confidential
treatment of certain provisions. Omitted material for which confidential treatment has been
requested has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  LOCAL.COM CORPORATIONDate: April 22, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Brenda AgiusBrenda AgiusChief Financial Officer and Secretary




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description10.1
    (1)
    
    Amendment No. 4 to Yahoo! Publisher Network Agreement dated April
16, 2009 by and among the Registrant and Yahoo! Inc.
 
 (1)
    
    Application has been made with the Securities and Exchange Commission to seek confidential
treatment of certain provisions. Omitted material for which confidential treatment has been
requested has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2153 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2153

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States Post Office building located in Brewer, 
Maine, as the ``Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain Post Office Building'', and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOSHUA LAWRENCE CHAMBERLAIN POST OFFICE 
BUILDING.
    The United States Post Office building located at 22 Parkway South, 
Brewer, Maine, shall be known and designated as the ``Joshua Lawrence 
Chamberlain Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, record, or other 
paper of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors
Apria Healthcare Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (33-94026, 33-51234, 33-75028, 33-77684, 33-57628 pertaining to Apria
Healthcare Group Inc./Homedco Group Inc.'s Stock Incentive Plan and Abbey
Healthcare Group Incorporated's 1992 Stock Option Plan, 1992 Stock Incentive
Plan, 1994 Stock Purchase Plan and 1991 Management Stock Purchase Plan) of our
report dated February 15, 1994, with respect to the consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows of Abbey Healthcare
Group Incorporated and subsidiaries for the year ended January 1, 1994, which
report is included in the Form 10-K of Apria Healthcare Group Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1995.


                                                     KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP




Orange County, California
November 7, 1996
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Robert L. Howard-AndersonName:

Robert L. Howard-AndersonTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10.8.1

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                        MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION
                     NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' INCENTIVE PLAN

Pursuant to the approval by the Board of Directors of MeriStar Hospitality
Corporation (the "Company") and the Company's shareholders at the Company's 2001
Annual Meeting, the MeriStar Hospitality Corporation Non-Employee Directors'
Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is amended, effective May 24, 2001, as follows:

         The reference to "125,000" in Section 6.2 of the Plan is hereby deleted
and replaced by "500,000".

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, MeriStar Hospitality Corporation has caused this amendment
to the Plan to be duly executed in its corporate name this 24th day of May,
2001.

                                                MERISTAR HOSPITALITY CORPORATION


                                                --------------------------------
                                                Christopher L. Bennett
                                                VP, Legal and Secretary