alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 552 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 552

     To allow the refurbishment and continued operation of a small 
 hydroelectric facility in central Montana by adjusting the amount of 
 charges to be paid to the United States under the Federal Power Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 14 (legislative day, March 6), 1995

 Mr. Burns (for himself and Mr. Baucus) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To allow the refurbishment and continued operation of a small 
 hydroelectric facility in central Montana by adjusting the amount of 
 charges to be paid to the United States under the Federal Power Act, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REFURBISHMENT AND CONTINUED OPERATION OF HYDROELECTRIC 
              FACILITY IN MONTANA.

    Notwithstanding section 10(e)(1) of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 803(e)(1)) or any other law requiring payment to the United 
States of an annual or other charge for the use, occupancy, and 
enjoyment of land by the holder of a license issued by the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission under part I of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 791 et seq.), a political subdivision of the State of Montana 
that accepts the terms and conditions of a license for Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission project number 1473 in Granite County and Deer 
Lodge County, Montana--
            (1) shall not be required to pay any such charge with 
        respect to the 5-year period following the date of acceptance; 
        and
            (2) after that 5-year period and for so long as the 
        political subdivision holds the license, shall be required to 
        pay such charges under section 10(e)(1) of the Federal Power 
        Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)(1)) or any other law for the use, 
        occupancy, and enjoyment of the land covered by the license as 
        the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or any other Federal 
        agency may assess, not to exceed a total of $20,000 for any 
        year.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RENE RAYOS,

 Appellant,

v.

DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00347-CV

Appeal from

393rd District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(TC # 2011-60285-393)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should 

be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant has failed to pay the case filing fee 

and has failed to comply with a notice by the Clerk requiring a response, we dismiss the appeal.

Appellant filed a notice with the trial court clerk seeking to appeal the judgment of the 

trial court but did not pay the case filing fee of $195 as required by TEX.R.APP.P. 5 nor did 

Appellant establish indigence in accordance with TEX.R.APP.P. 20.1. On December 3, 2013, the 

Clerk of the Court made a second request for payment of the filing fee. The Clerk notified 

Appellant that the filing fee had not been paid and failure to pay it within twenty days could 

result in dismissal of the appeal pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 42.3(b) and (c). Appellant has not 

paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the Clerk’s inquiries. We therefore dismiss the 

appeal.
- 2 -

February 19, 2014

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 04 0 . ROBERT R. J OHNSON v . THE STATE.

In 2 0 0 2
, Ro b ert R. J o h ns o n p l ed g u i l t y t o m u l t ip l e offen s es

. In 2 0 1 1
, J o h n so n fi led a m o t i o n t o v acat e a v o i d s en t en ce, arg ui n g t h a t h i s i n d i ct m en t was v o i d an d
rai s in g a ch al l en g e t o t he gran d j u ry

. Th e t ri al co u rt d i s m i s s e d t he m o t i o n , an d
J ohnson f ile d b o th a d i rect ap p eal an d di s cret i o n ary ap p li cat i o n

. Bo t h were d i s m i s s ed

. See Cas e No s

. A1 2 D0 2 3 4 (Feb

. 1 3
, 2 0 1 2 ) & A1 2 A 0 9 4 6 (M ar. 7
, 2 0 1 2). In Ap ri l
2 0 2 1
, J oh n s o n ag ai n fi l ed a pro s e m o t io n ch al len g i ng t h e i n d i ct m en t an d t he g ran d ju ry

. T h e t ri al co u r t d en i ed t h e m o t io n , an d J o hn s on fi l ed t h i s ap p eal

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n fo r t w o reas on s

. Fi rs t , “ a p e t i t i o n t o v acat e o r m o d i fy a ju d g m en t o f co n v i ct io n i s n o t an

a p p r o p ri at e rem ed y i n a cri m i n al cas e.” Ha r p er v. S t a t e , 28 6 Ga. 2 1 6
, 21 8 (1 ) ( 6 8 6
SE2 d 7 86 ) (2 0 0 9 ). An y ap peal fro m an ord er d en y in g o r d i s m i s s in g s u ch a m o t i o n

m u st b e d i s m i s s ed

. See id

. at 2 1 8 (2 ); Ro b er t s v. S t at e , 28 6 Ga. 5 3 2 (6 9 0 SE2 d 1 5 0 ) (2 0 1 0). Seco n d, “ [i ] t i s ax i om at i c t h at t he s am e i s s u e can n o t b e rel i t i g at ed ad
i n fi n it u m .” Ech o l

s v. S t a t e , 24 3 Ga. Ap p

. 7 7 5
, 7 7 6 (5 3 4 SE2 d 4 6 4 ) (2 0 0 0 ) (p u n ct u at i o n o m i t t ed ). Ou r pri o r d i s m i s s al o rd ers i n t hi s cas e co n s t i tu t e t h e l aw o f t h e

cas e, an d we are p recl u d ed fro m rev i s i t i n g t he i ss u es p rev io u s ly l i t i g at ed

. See Ro ss v. S t a t e , 3 1 0 Ga. Ap p . 3 2 6, 3 27 (7 1 3 SE2 d 4 38 ) (2 0 1 1 ). August 23, 2021F or t h es e reas o n s , we l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er t hi s ap p eal
, w h i ch i s h e r e b y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 08/23/2021
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 08-1978 SIERRA CLUB, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, and THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v . THOMAS WAGNER, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the White Mountain National Forest; ABIGAIL KIMBELL, in her official capacity as Chief of the United States Forest Service; EDWARD T. SCHAFER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture; and the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA The opinion of this Court, issued on February 6, 2009, should be amended as follows: On page 5, paragraph 2, line 2, "will" should not be underlined. On page 9, paragraph 1, line 4, "the" should be d e leted and "plan." should be changed to "plan[s].". On page 14, paragraph 1, line 1, change "best evidence" to "best available science". On page 21, first full paragraph, line 2, eliminate "that" in "its EAs that are lengthy".
Exhibit 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL

OFFICER



I, Daniel T. Ciporin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Shopping.com Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Shopping.com Ltd.



By:

/s/ Daniel T. CiporinName:

Daniel T. CiporinTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer




I, Greg J.
Santora, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Shopping.com Ltd. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Shopping.com Ltd.



By:

/s/ Greg J. SantoraName:

Greg J. SantoraTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 11


                        THERMO BIOANALYSIS CORPORATION

                       Computation of Earnings per Share


                                                                             
                                                    Year Ended
                                       -------------------------------------
                                          Dec. 28,    Dec. 30,      Dec. 31,
                                              1996        1995          1994
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Computation of Primary
    Earnings (Loss) per Share:

  Net Income (Loss) (a)                $  (436,000)$ 2,514,000  $ 2,400,000

  Shares:
    Weighted average
      shares outstanding                 8,542,324   7,693,637    6,500,000

    Add: Shares issuable
         from assumed
         exercise of 
         options (as 
         determined by
         the application
         of the treasury
         stock method)                      58,725     117,450      117,450
                                       ----------- -----------  -----------
    Weighted average
      shares outstanding,
      as adjusted (b)                    8,601,049   7,811,087    6,617,450
                                       ----------- -----------  -----------
  Primary Earnings (Loss)
    per Share (a) / (b)                $      (.05)$       .32  $       .36
                                       =========== ===========  ===========
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Syms Corp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marcy Syms, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Marcy SymsMarcy SymsChief Executive OfficerSyms CorpApril 27, 2007
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

February 3, 2015

No. 12

- 3343

MINIKAN WRETH JOHNSON,

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent

(Agency No. 079

- 925

- 413)

Present: HARDIMAN, SCIRICA and ROTH, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Respondent to Clarify or Amend Decision of December 17, 2014.

2. Response in Opposition by Petitioner to Motio n to Clarify or Amend Decision

of December 17, 2014.

Respectfully,

Clerk/tmm

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion to clarify or amend the decision of December 17 , 2014 is granted.

Upon further review, the Court will issue an amended opinion. The amended opinion

does not affect the entry of judgment.

By the Court,

s/Anthony J. Scirica

Circuit Judge

Dated: June 16, 2015

tmm/cc: Herbert C. Shelley, Esq.

Jessica L. Urban, Esq.

Jeffrey Bernstein, Esq.

Margaret A. O ’ Donnell, Esq.

Ann C. Varnon, Esq.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on 10-K of Sen Yu International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Zhenyu Shang, Chief Executive Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.








Date:  December 2, 2010





By:  /s/ Zhenyu Shang


Name: Zhenyu Shang


Title: Chief Executive Officer












This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





---
# HAWKEYEIMAGERY,

# LLC

January 5, 2016 Brittany Newton U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Ave. SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Exemption Request Section 333 ofthe FAA Reform Act Dear Brittany Newton CAPTURING THE HERE &. Now

Hawkeye Imagery, LLC fills that itwill fill the public interest requirement ofthis exemption by allowing data that is taken by the sUAS to help find areas that should be sprayed by asister company North Star Helicopters, Inc. a 137 Operator. North Star is often asked by public and private entities for help in identifyingtarget areas thatthey are to apply herbicides to, some of North Star's customers in the past have been: US Fish and Wildlife (restoration on native habitat and protection ofendangered species) US Air Force (restoration of native habitat on Holloman Airforce base) White Sands Missile Range (controlling invasive species) State ofTexas (Restoration of native habitat and Protection ofendangered species) State of New Mexico (Restoration of native habitat and Protection ofendangered species) Timber Company's in Texas, Louisiana and Arkansas. Private Ranchers in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. North Star Helicopters has always made it its goal to help government agencies that need help identifying locations to spray, it is their hope to use Hawkeye Imageryto reduce cost in obtaining current imageryforthis use with afast turnaround. Sincerely,

Robert A Ewing President/CEO

HAWKEYE IMAGERY, LLC PO Box 1444,Jasper, TX 75951 Page 1
1/30/13 page of



### INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT (IRExR)

Chemical ID: P-13-0201 Reviewer: Kwon/SS

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary

Exposure Scenario 1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air Drinking Water Fish Ingestion
ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q10 4
CC = 5 PDM Days Exceede d LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD

Release activity(ies) 2 ; exposure calculation(s) 3 mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day

max acute eco --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 2 Release activities are from engineering report's and activity labels. Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at same location. 3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (A DR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure scenario. CC is the aquatic concentration of concern. 4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q 10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily streamflow of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period.

Remarks:


### Results Table: Exposure Based (X B)/Persistent (P2B2) Criteria

Parameter Exp Based Persistent Exceedance Value Drinking (Surface) Wate r Dose (mg/kg/day) Fish Ingestion Dose (mg/kg/day) Inhalation Dose (mg/kg/day) Groundwater Dose (mg/kg/day) Surface Water Release After Treatment (kg/yr) Total Release After Treatment (kg/yr) Consumer Use?



### Fate test recommendations?: (default is NA)1/30/13 page of

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0201 Assessor: Kwon/SS

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES

Scenario#:1 Number of Release Sites: Release Activity: : Max ADR
Release Description: WATER LANDFILL Non-sludge/Sludge STACK FUGITIVE

Total Releases:
(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr)

Non-sludge/Sludge
Release Days/yr:

Per Site Release:
(kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day)

Remarks:1/30/13 page of

INITIAL REVIEW EX POSURE REPORT

Chemical ID: P-13-0201

SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES

SCENARIO #: 1 Number of Sites: RELEASE ACTIVITY: Max ADR

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW's (All facilities)
SIC-CODE (S): 4952 EX POSED POPULATION: Adult

WWT REMOVAL (%) RELEASE DAYS PRETREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day) POSTTREATMENT RELEASE (kg/site/day) DWT (%) BCF (L/kg)

0.00 0.00

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER

PLANT TYPE % ILE FACILITY STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. ( μ g/l)

Harmonic

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 Harmonic Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10

ALL 50 125.56 44.02 26.80 22.53 3.98E-02 0.11 0.19 0.22

ALL 10 11.11 1.94 1.06 0.96 0.45 2.58 4.72 5.21

DRINKING WATER AND FISH IN GESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES

Exposure Units Drinking Water Results Drinking Water Units Fish Ingestion Results Fish Ingestion

Units
50% 10% 50% 10%

Cancer

LADD pot 8.51E-10 9.62E-09 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day

LADC pot 4.36E-08 4.93E-07 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg

Acute

ADR pot 9.49E-06 2.15E-04 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day

SIC Code Comments:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02535]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] & 
Parcel Select Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 8, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
February 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail, USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] & Parcel 
Select Contract 4 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available 
at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-175, CP2024-181.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-02535 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2) the informationcontained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ PAULWALKER            

**PaulWalker**

**President and Chief Executive Officer**

 

Date: August 13, 2003 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                          53,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  175,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,000
<INVENTORY>                                    123,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               343,749
<PP&E>                                         663,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                 145,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,338,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,246,469
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  1,022,580
<COMMON>                                       876,150
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,946,903)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,338,794
<SALES>                                      1,973,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,350,268
<CGS>                                        1,739,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,515,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (35,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,151,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,151,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,151,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
        

</TABLE>