alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 12.1


                CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHEAST HOLDINGS, L.P.
                 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
                      (In thousands except ratio amounts)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                        1996             1995                  1994
                                    --------           -------               --------
<S>                                 <C>             <C>               <C>
Earnings
--------
Loss before taxes                   $(40,420)       $(27,515)                $(9,609)
Fixed Charges                         42,398           19,511                   4,903
                                    --------          -------                --------
  Earnings                             1,978          (8,004)                 (4,706)

Fixed Charges
 Interest Expense                     41,021           18,722                   4,655
 Interest Element of Rentals             206              132                      33
 Amortization of debt costs            1,171              657                     215
                                    --------          -------                --------
   Total Fixed Charges              $ 42,398          $19,511                  $4,903
                                    ========          =======                ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges      -                -                       -
</TABLE>

(1)  Earnings for the year ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were
     insufficient to cover the fixed charges by $40,420, $27,515 and $9,609,
     respectively.  As a result of such deficiencies, the ratios are not
     presented above.
#### Ben WILSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29896.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 11, 1958.

Sam M. Russell, Stephenville, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*586MORRISON, Presiding- Judge.

The offense is theft by bailee; the punishment, three years.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the jury’s finding that the meat in question was appropriated by the appellant so as to constitute the crime of theft is seriously challenged.

The witness Dawson was at the time in question en route to his home in Oklahoma in a pickup truck in which he was carrying 128 pounds of frozen beef. He had motor trouble and decided to spend the night in city of Dublin. Through the intervention of a filling station operator, Dawson secured permission from the appellant to store his meat in the deep freeze at appellant’s cafe. The following morning when Dawson presented himself at the cafe to reclaim his meat the appellant was not on duty and the meat was not in the deep freeze. The officers were called, and they proceeded to appellant’s home and asked the appellant where the meat was that had been stored with him overnight. The appellant immediately told the officers that the meat was in his ice box and opened the same and showed it to them. It was shown that the meat was in its orginal packages, none of which had been opened.

The appellant did not testify but offered testimony that he had never before been convicted of a felony.

The able trial court charged on the law of circumstantial evidence, but we have concluded that even under such a charge the evidence is insufficient to support the jury’s finding that the appellant appropriated the meat to his own use and benefit.

None of the meat was missing; none of the packages had been opened, nor had there been any effort to obliterate Dawson’s name which appeared on many of the packages; there was no evidence that the appellant had tried to sell any of the meat or that he concealed it in any way or that he hesitated or answered untruthfully when being questioned about the property.

In Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 49 S.W. 387, 388, Judge Henderson, speaking for this Court on a similar fact situation, said:

> “It is true this proof can be made by circumstances, and the party may convert the property to his own use while he still has it in possession, not having parted with it; but in such case the proof should establish the fact of the appropriation beyond a probability or suspicion.”

See also Cannon v. State, 38 Tex.Cr.R. 322, 42 S.W. 981.

For all this record reveals, the appellant may have become apprehensive about a failure of his deep freeze to continue to operate through the night and decided to carry the meat to his own home at the time he closed the cafe for the night.

Finding the evidence insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
EXHIBIT 32


                                  CERTIFICATION
                      (Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, (i) the
foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed by Yadkin Valley Company (the
"Registrant") for the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

Date:   March 29, 2006               /s/ DAVID S. PERRY
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     David S. Perry, President and Treasurer
                                     (principal executive and financial officer)
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard D. Schaeffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/LEONARD D. SCHAEFFERLeonard D. Schaeffer Chief Executive
OfficerMarch 26, 2003 | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                  | 

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR

RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of New Green Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Ring Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: September 18, 2009
By:
/s/   George RingGeorge RingChief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40351

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIBERTO ZUNIGA-PEREZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:06-CR-1037-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgmentin a Criminal Case,Feliberto Zuniga-Perez raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d

624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The

appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
|   | 1.     | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | 2.     | Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                        |

|   | Dated: August 9, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ DAVID T. TABER                    |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |                  |   |   | David T. Taber                        |
|   |                  |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                  |   |   |                                  |
|   | Dated: August 9, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ MITCHELL A. DERENZO               |
|   |                  |   |   | Mitchell A. Derenzo                   |
|   |                  |   |   | Executive Vice President and          |
|   |                  |   |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

----
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial


Statements
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the


Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002





I,
Michael G. Carlton, the Chief Executive Officer of Crescent Financial
Corporation, in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the Form
10-Q filed by Crescent Financial Corporation (the "Issuer") for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the
periods presented therein.





Date:
      August 13, 2009
              /s/ Michael G.
  CarltonMichael
      G. CarltonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: City of Houston v. Nikolette Ledesma and Elsa Estrada

Appellate case number: 01-22-00377-CV

Trial court case number: 2017-84026

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, City of Houston, has filed an “Unopposed Motion to Transfer Record 

from Prior Related Appeal.” In its motion, the City notes that there was a prior, related 

appeal in this Court, appellate case number 01-19-00034-CV, “which resulted in the case 

being remanded back to the trial court.” The City requests that the clerk’s record from the 

prior appeal be transferred to this appeal.

Appellant’s motion is granted. The Clerk of this Court is directed to copy the 

clerk’s record, filed on February 19, 2019, in appellate case number 01-19-00034-CV, and 

file the copies in appellate case number 01-22-00337-CV.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ April Farris_____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __September 22, 2022____________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CAFETERIA OPERATORS, L.P. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,395
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      885
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                      6,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,411
<PP&E>                                         102,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,729
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,057
<BONDS>                                         66,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,295)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,314
<SALES>                                        193,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               193,530
<CGS>                                           58,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               139,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,740)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,740)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,740)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T PABL O PER EZ - ZARATE , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73456 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 760- 885 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anua ry10, 2011 ** B e f o r e : B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . P abl o P e r e z - Z ar a t e , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of M e xi c o, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f orc anc e l l a t i on of r e m o v a l. W e d is m is s th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . 

# FI LED JAN 20 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73456 2 W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the B IA ’ s di sc re t i on ary det erm i nat i on that P e r e z - Z a r a t e f

a i l e d t o s how e xc e pt i ona la nd e xtr e m e l yunus ua l ha r ds hi p t o a q u a lif y in g r e la tiv e . See M

art i nez-R osas v. G on zales , 42 4 F . 3d 92 6, 93 0 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). W e do n otaddres s P er ez -Z ar at e’ s c hal l enges t o fi nd i ng s s etforth b y the IJ b u t n o t a d o p te db yth e B I A . See B rezi l i en v. H older , 56 9 F . 3d 40 3, 41 1 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( w here the B IA cond uct s i t s ow n revi ew of the evi dence and l aw rather than a dopt i ng the I J ’ s de c i s i on, ourr e vi e w i s l i m i t e d t o the B I A ’ s de c i s i on, e xc e ptt o the ext entthatthe IJ ’ s opi ni on i s e xp re ss l y a do pt ed). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DI S MI S S E D.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto-Q International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom
Lam, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial 2 condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods presented in this
          Report.

Date: May 17, 2004



                                            /s/  TOM LAM
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Tom Lam, President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
Facility Designation Cancer

MIR Cancer

IncidenceNoncancer

Max HI Target

Organ 54003NEIWV0012 Major 3.84E-073.67E-05 2.94E-03 respiratory NEI11202 Major 6.09E-06 1.26E-03 3.84E-02 respiratory NEI11393 Major 9.01E-06 1.30E-03 6.68E-02 respiratory NEI11431 Major 3.44E-062.99E-04 1.84E-02 respiratory NEI12037 Major 3.06E-063.80E-03 2.42E-02 respiratory NEI12758 Area 1.58E-064.09E-05 1.08E-02 respiratory NEI19980 Area 3.25E-07 1.39E-05 1.73E-03 respiratory NEI21588 Area 2.22E-06 1.78E-04 1.70E-02 respiratory NEI25015 Area 2.10E-05 1.02E-02 1.66E-01 respiratory NEI2AZT18199 Major 4.10E-08 1.79E-06 3.18E-04 respiratory NEI2CAT18625 Area 3.17E-08 7.98E-06 2.34E-04 respiratory NEI32453 Area 3.73E-077.44E-05 2.85E-03 respiratory NEI32853 Major 1.16E-05 1.27E-02 1.27E-02 incidence NEI32855 Area 8.99E-067.36E-03 7.08E-02 respiratory NEI34985 Area 2.26E-065.28E-04 1.10E-02 respiratory NEI42077 Major 7.56E-07 1.24E-04 5.88E-03 respiratory NEI6410 Area 7.22E-078.67E-05 4.80E-03 respiratory NEI8091 Area 1.81E-06 1.21E-04 1.28E-02 respiratory NEI8099 Area 1.25E-06 1.75E-04 8.11E-03 respiratory NEI8623 Area 5.05E-073.13E-05 2.48E-03 respiratory NEIAZT$12365 Area 6.08E-07 1.54E-05 4.67E-03 respiratory NEIFL1051050375 Area 6.09E-072.05E-04 4.49E-03 neurological NEIGA1210021 Area 7.18E-067.07E-04 6.25E-02 respiratory NEIIN641 Area 1.03E-083.96E-07 1.90E-04 neurological NEIMIB7205 Area 2.36E-073.60E-05 1.82E-03 respiratory NEIMS2803300 Area 1.43E-064.23E-04 1.12E-02 respiratory NEIOH0950013 Major 2.75E-064.95E-04 5.72E-03 developmental NEIOHWF025 Area 5.75E-083.11E-06 5.63E-04 developmental NEISCGFG001 Major 2.98E-08 6.91E-06 2.28E-04 respiratory

1 BOLD indicates a cancer risk great than 1 in a million or a noncancer HI greater than 1

Table 2b – Maximum Predicted HEM-3 Chronic Risks (Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing)

Facility NEI ID Source Category Chronic Risk1

1 of 1
Exhibit 13.2

 

Compañía de Minas BuenaventuraS.A.A.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.           I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compañíade Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the “Company”).

 

2.           (A)           The Company’sAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United StatesSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and

 

(B)           Theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: April 30, 2012
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 IMPRESO, INC. CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Susan M. Atkins, Chief Financial Officer of IMPRESO, INC. (the
Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:  1.
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended November 30, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of the Company.3.
    Item 4 Controls and Procedures in the Companys Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by
reference. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and is
not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 14th
day of January, 2005. /s/ Susan M. AtkinsName:
    
    Susan M.
AtkinsTitle:
    
    Chief
Financial Officer
 *A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.