alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.15


SENIOR VP COMPENSATION PLAN
2016
           
Position Title:    Senior Vice President - Troy Rosser
Territory:                      United States and Canada


Base Salary $300,000 Per Year*


*$155,000 of the salary will be paid on a pro-rata basis over the year.  The remaining $145,000 of salary will be paid in varying amounts throughout the year based upon productivity and sales.  That is, the first $145,000 earned under the commission structure below is guaranteed, will be treated as salary, and is included in the base salary of $300,000. 


Prorated goals - Goals shall be prorated by the number of months left in the year as of the effective date minus 3 calendar months for the transition period.


Commission Structure: 
Add-on Business Sales - Acute EHR, TruBridge, Rycan
Add on business as defined by service line. 
		
	•
	EHR after 12th month from initial installation


		
	•
	TruBridge/Rycan commission and goal credit only applies to the first year of the initial term of the agreement. 




Commission percentages: 0.5%


Add-on Business Sales - AHT
Add on business as defined by service line. 
		
	•
	License Adds do not count towards goal




Commission percentages: 0.5%


New Business - Acute EHR, AHT, TruBridge and Rycan
Profit goal of $29,300,000 for new business sales per year.  New business as defined by service line.   
		
	•
	EHR after 13th month from initial installation


		
	•
	TruBridge/Rycan commission and goal credit only applies to the first year of the initial term of the agreement. 




Commission percentages: 1% to goal, 1.5% above goal 


Payment Default by Client
In the event of a payment default on the part of the client for billed software, hardware or services, all commissions paid on the defaulted items are payable to CPSI and will be deducted from future commissions.  In the event partial payment has been received, the commission to be deducted will be prorated based upon the payment amount received.
Post Employment Commission Payment
Commissions will not be paid to any individual who is no longer an employee of the Sales Department of CPSI.  This includes those who have resigned or whose employment has been terminated.
In the event of an untimely death while employed in good standing, commissions will be paid under the following criteria to the estate/beneficiary(ies) as listed in the employee’s last will and testament.
		
	1.
	Items on order and invoiced within three months of the employee’s passing.


		
	2.
	Items invoiced within three months of the initial installation date for new sites that are under contract but not yet installed at the time of the employee’s passing.





















Sr. Vice President:             /s/ Troy Rosser                       Date:    August 18, 2016   
    
Executive Officer:             /s/ Boyd Douglas                   Date:     August 18, 2016  
        


2
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Precision Response Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-19651) of our report
dated February 17, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements
and financial statement schedule of Precision Response Corporation as of
December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and
1996, which report is included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
 
/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
Miami, Florida
March 30, 1999
SERVED: JANUARY 25, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

GRANT AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA.;,2012-1268 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011AL030055) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

COini1.1Unications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office of Brent R. Cole, P.C. 

821 N Street, S\lite 208 

Anchorage, AK 99501 

TEL: 907-277-8001 

FAX: 907-277-8002 

ONE COPY 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 W. 7th Avenue #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-1268 

(Civil Penalty Actiop) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
•si I-* I M in



# en 

# 5 

# oi±)^ 01 

# TO l_



# 2

IJ SJ 

### > > v 

### C ; 

# 3 > 

# 8 r 0 13 wi >: H 2 •i; r H 

## li\ \ \ \



# «\W\
**Exhibit 32.1**
**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of MeriStar HospitalityCorporation (the “Issuer”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Paul W. Whetsell, Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78mor 78o(d)); and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Issuer.
Date: March 15, 2004                                                      /s/ Paul W. Whetsell   Paul W. Whetsell   Chief Executive OfficerMeriStar Hospitality Corporation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARELY YAZMIN GUERRA CRUZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71933

Agency No. A095-451-467

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2011** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Arely Yazmin Guerra Cruz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reissue its previous decision denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to

FILED

APR 27 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71933

reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations. HernandezVelasquez v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1073, 1077 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition

for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion or violate due process in denying

Guerra Cruz’s motion to reissue because it had properly mailed the earlier decision

at Guerra Cruz’s last known addresses. See Singh v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 1170,

1172 (9th Cir. 2007) (BIA fulfills its statutory duty of service if the decision is

mailed to the appropriate party at his or her address of record); Lata v. INS, 204

F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for petitioner to prevail on a due

process claim).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



August 16, 2004



In connection with the Large Scale Biology Corporation Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald J. Artale, certify, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Large Scale Biology Corporation for the
fiscal period covered by the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Ronald J. ArtaleRonald J. ArtaleSenior Vice President, Chief OperatingOfficer and Chief Financial OfficerLarge Scale Biology Corporation
SikaHardenerMI_Characterization_0712.doc page 3 of 9

Sika Technology AG, Branch Zurich, Tüffenwies 16, P.O. Box, CH–8048 Zurich, Switzerland 

Tel: +41 (0)58 436 40 40, Fax: +41 (0)58 436 44 44, www.sika.com 

Titration (Amine and Imine Groups) 

Procedure: 

Ca. 200 mg of the sample were weighed into a beaker and dissolved in 50 ml acetic acid (99-

100%). This solution was potentiometrically titrated with 0.1N perchloric acid in acetic acid 

and the imine content determined from the end point (glass pH electrode, ∆E = 20 mV). 

The purity was then calculated by reference to the theoretical amine+imine content of the 

sample. 

Result: (average of three measurements) 

Amine+Imine Content, 

measured [mEq/g] 

Amine+Imine Content, 

theoretical [mEq/g] 

Purity 

8.364 8.390 99.7% (±0.3%) 

The purity given above reflects the sum of all constituents which contain imine and/or amine 

groups, as identified and quantified by GC-MS. 
SikaHardenerMI_Characterization_0712.doc page 4 of 9

Sika Technology AG, Branch Zurich, Tüffenwies 16, P.O. Box, CH–8048 Zurich, Switzerland 

Tel: +41 (0)58 436 40 40, Fax: +41 (0)58 436 44 44, www.sika.com 

1H-NMR 

Procedure: 

The sample was dissolved in dry CDCl3 and measured on a Bruker DPX-300 instrument 

operating at 300.13 MHz; measuring temperature 296.7 K; 16 scans. 

Chemical shifts δ are given in ppm relative to tetramethylsilane (TMS), coupling constants J

in Hz, whereby no difference is made between true and pseudo coupling patterns; signal 

allocation is tentative. 

Result: 

δ 7.61 and 7.60 (2×s, ratio ca. 3/1, total 1 H, CH=N [isomers]), 7.49 (2×s, ratio ca. 3/1, total 1 

H, CH=N [isomers]), 3.61 (m, 8 H, OCH2

cycl.), 3.28 (m, 1 H, CH=N-CHcycl.), 3.10 and 3.00 

(2×d, J = 11.1, total 2 H, CH=N-CH2C

cycl.), 2.45 (m, 8 H, NCH2cycl.), 2.32 (s, 4 H, 

NCH2C(CH3)2), 1.55–0.85 (m, 27 H, CH2

cycl. and CH3). 

SikaHardenerMI_Characterization_0712.doc page 6 of 9

Sika Technology AG, Branch Zurich, Tüffenwies 16, P.O. Box, CH–8048 Zurich, Switzerland 

Tel: +41 (0)58 436 40 40, Fax: +41 (0)58 436 44 44, www.sika.com 

FT-IR 

Procedure: 

The sample was measured as neat film at 23 °C on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum 1 FT-IR 

instrument equipped with a UATR cell (1 bounce Diamond/ZnSe); 30 scans, spectral window 

4000 – 600 cm–1; resolution 4 cm–1. The spectrum was smoothed, normalized and baseline 

corrected. 

Peaks (maxima of absorption bands) are given in cm–1; relative intensities of the peaks are 

designated as w (weak) / m (medium / s (strong) / vs (very strong); sh = shoulder. 

Result: 

3311vw, 2953m, 2912m, 2850m, 2805m, 2764w sh, 1978vw, 1664m (νC=N), 1456m, 1377m, 

1362m, 1333w, 1318m, 1282m, 1268m, 1205w, 1136m, 1117vs, 1071m, 1036m, 1013m, 

968vw, 929w, 882m, 865s, 803m, 630w. 

4000.0 3600 3200 2800 2400 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400.0

0.00

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.00

cm-1

%T 

Härter MI

2953.07

2 11.52

2850.11

2805.25

1978.48

1664.25

1455.51

1377 47

1361.65

1317.7

1282.18

1267.73

1204.85

1136 3

11 6.81

070.91

1036.44

1012.76

928.52

881 62

864.54

802.65

629.50
----

----

I Actos adoptados em aplicação dos Tratados CE/Euratom cuja publicação é obrigatória

REGULAMENTOS

----

REGULAMENTO (CE) N.o 5/2007 DA COMISSÃO

de 5 de Janeiro de 2007

que estabelece os valores forfetários de importação para a determinação do preço de entrada de certos frutos e produtos hortícolas

A COMISSÃO DAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEIAS,

Tendo em conta o Tratado que institui a Comunidade Europeia,

Tendo em conta o Regulamento (CE) n.o 3223/94 da Comissão, de 21 de Dezembro de 1994, que estabelece regras de execução do regime de importação dos frutos e dos produtos hortícolas (1), e, nomeadamente, o n.o 1 do seu artigo 4.o,

Considerando o seguinte:

ADOPTOU O PRESENTE REGULAMENTO:

Artigo 1.o

Os valores forfetários de importação referidos no artigo 4.o do Regulamento (CE) n.o 3223/94 são fixados como indicado no quadro constante do anexo.

Artigo 2.o

O presente regulamento entra em vigor em 6 de Janeiro de 2007.

O presente regulamento é obrigatório em todos os seus elementos e directamente aplicável em todos os Estados-Membros.

Feito em Bruxelas, em 5 de Janeiro de 2007.

Pela Comissão

Jean-Luc DEMARTY

Director-Geral da Agricultura e do Desenvolvimento Rural

----

(1)JO L 337 de 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulamento com a última redacção que lhe foi dada pelo Regulamento (CE) n.o 386/2005 (JO L 62 de 9.3.2005, p. 3).

----

ANEXO

do regulamento da Comissão, de 5 de Janeiro de 2007, que estabelece os valores forfetários de importação para a determinação do preço de entrada de certos frutos e produtos hortícolas

----

(1)  Nomenclatura dos países fixada pelo Regulamento (CE) n.o 1833/2006 da Comissão (JO L 354 de 14.12.2006, p. 19). O código «ZZ» representa «outras origens».

----

Rectificações

----

Rectificação à Directiva 2006/142/CE da Comissão, de 22 de Dezembro de 2006, que altera o anexo III A da Directiva 2000/13/CE do Parlamento Europeu e do Conselho, que estabelece uma lista dos ingredientes que devem ser mencionados, em todas as situações, na rotulagem dos géneros alimentícios

(«Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» L 368 de 23 de Dezembro de 2006)

No índice e na página 110, no título da directiva:

em vez de:

«2006/ /CE»,

deve ler-se:

«2006/142/CE».

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-47314, 333-88995) and S-8 (Nos. 333-10609,
333-47233 and 333-82565) of Webhire, Inc. of our report dated October 30,
2000 except for the information presented in paragraph one and two of Note
15, for which the dates are December 29, 2000 and January 11, 2001,
respectively, relating to the financial statements, and of our report dated
October 30, 2000 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears
in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
January 11, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0724 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JAY LE CLEVELAND,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 23 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2023

07/17/2023
II

Calendar No. 133

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 531

To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in an in banc hearing

of a case to continue to participate in that case after taking senior

status, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 10 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. SIMON) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Reported by Mr. HATCH, with an amendment

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in an in

banc hearing of a case to continue to participate in

that case after taking senior status, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

4 The last sentence of section 46(c) of title 28, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘as a member’’ and
2

S 531 RS

1 all that follows through the period and inserting the fol2 lowing: ‘‘as a member of an in banc court—

3 ‘‘(1) reviewing a decision of a panel of which

4 such judge was a member; or

5 ‘‘(2) continuing to participate in the decision of

6 a case or controversy that was heard or reheard by

7 the court in banc at a time when such judge was in

8 regular active service.’’.

9 The last sentence of section 46(c) of title 28, United

10 States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘eligible’’

11 and by inserting before the period at the end of the sentence

12 ‘‘, or (2) to continue to participate in the decision of a case

13 or controversy that was heard or reheard by the court in

14 banc at a time when such judge was in regular active

15 service’’.

Calendar No. 133

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 531

A BILL

To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in

and for other purposes.ticipate in that case after taking senior status,an in banc hearing of a case to continue to parJUNE 29 (legislative day, JUNE 19), 1995

Reported with an amendment
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4621

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus GARFIELD ANTHONY ANDERSON, a/k/a James McDonald, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-70) Submitted: February 28, 2005 Decided: March 31, 2005 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, James E. Todd, Jr., Research and Writing Specialist, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Garfield Anthony Anderson pled guilty, without a plea agreement, to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (a), (b)(2) (2000). Anderson was sentenced to ninety-six months’ imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release. The district court also specified an identical alternative sentence of ninety-six months followed by three years supervised release, pursuant to this court’s recommendation in United States v. Hammoud , 378 F.3d 426 (4th Cir. 2004) (order), opinion issued by 381 F.3d 316, 353-54 (4th Cir. 2004) (en banc), cert. granted and judgment vacated , 125 S. Ct. 1051 (2005). Anderson appealed, challenging the constitutionality of the federal sentencing scheme in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). The case was held in abeyance pending decision in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). That opinion has now issued and applies the Court’s reasoning in Blakelyto the federal sentencing guidelines. We conclude that because the alternative sentence the district court pronounced in case the federal sentencing guidelines were invalidated was identical to the mandatory sentence imposed under the federal sentencing guidelines as they existed at that time, any error resulting from the sentence imposed by the district court was harmless. Accordingly, we affirm Anderson’s sentence.- 3 - We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William Whittle, Vice President and Treasurer of Big Bear Gold Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Big Bear Gold Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 28, 2004

/s/ William Whittle	William Whittle
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)