alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 21, 2012 

h0514 

Order 

 

May 21, 2012 

144586 & (18) 

JACQUELINE R. JONES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 144586 

 COA: 307581 

Kalamazoo CC: 1999-007517-PP 

JIMMIE LEE JONES, JR., 

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the January 26, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE
18,

UNITED STATES CODE)



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Raybor Management Inc. (the Company), in his capacity and as of the date set forth below, does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 10-QSB Report) that to his knowledge:



(1)    the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    the information contained in the
10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: October 15, 2003



/S/    JEFFREY D. HOYALJeffrey D. Hoyal President and Chief
Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Raybor Management, Inc. and will be retained by Raybor Management Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derek ALLISON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4419.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 12, 2003.

*683Charles L. Morgan, Jr., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Derek Allison was convicted by a jury of one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine base. On appeal, Allison alleges the district court erred in assessing a two-level enhancement for possession of a firearm pursuant to *U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual*§ 2Dl.l(b)(l) (2000). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

Eugene Ervin, Allison’s co-defendant, testified at Allison’s sentencing hearing that a handgun was present on the passenger seat of Allison’s car when Ervin purchased nine ounces of cocaine base from Allison. The presence of guns in a location where drug transactions occur implicates the enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon. *See United States v. White,*875 F.2d 427, 433 (4th Cir.1989). The district court did not clearly err in finding that a preponderance of the evidence supports a firearm.

Finding Allison’s claim to be without merit, we affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**Co-Registrant(Commission File Number 000-30761):**

 

**UbiquiTelInc.**

**OneWest Elm Street**

**Suite400**

**Conshohocken,Pennsylvania 19428**

 

**Co-Registrant(Commission File Number 333-39950):**

 

**UbiquiTelOperating Company**

**OneWest Elm Street**

**Suite400**

**Conshohocken,Pennsylvania 19428**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofUbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James J. Volk, Chief FinancialOfficer of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of UbiquiTel Inc.and UbiquiTel Operating Company.

 
|   | UBIQUITEL INC.              |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |                        |
|   |                        |
|   | */s/ James J. Volk*         |   |
|   | James J. Volk               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                        |
|   |                        |
|   | UBIQUITEL OPERATING COMPANY |
|   |                        |
|   |                        |
|   | */s/ James J. Volk*         |   |
|   | James J. Volk               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |                        |
|   |                        |
|   | August 6, 2004              |

 

----
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Kathleen P. Bloch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment
No. 1 to Annual Report of PC Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as hereby amended,  fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as hereby
amended, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of PC Group, Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:  April
      30, 2010
                /s/
      Kathleen P. BlochKathleen
      P. Bloch, Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.21




The following form of agreement was executed by The Ohio Valley Bank Company and each of the following directors on the dates indicated beside their names:







	
Name

	 	
Date of Agreement


	 	 	 
	
Anna P. Barnitz

	 	
December 13, 2016


	 	 	 
	
Brent A. Saunders

	 	
December 13, 2016















2016 DETERMINATION OF DIRECTOR'S FEES


 


FOR PURPOSES OF THE DIRECTOR RETIREMENT AGREEMENT


FOR _____________







THIS AGREEMENT is made this ______ day of December, 2016, by and between THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY located in Gallipolis, Ohio (the "Company"), and ______________ (the "Director").


 


The Company and the Director entered into a DIRECTOR RETIREMENT AGREEMENT most recently amended and restated on ____________________, 20__ (the "Agreement").


 


The Director agrees that Director's section 1.7 of the Agreement be amended to read as follows:








		1.7	
"Fees" means the total annual board retainer and monthly fees paid to all directors, earned by the Director during a Plan Year.  For purposes of clarity, Fees does not include committee fees of any type, lead director fees or other special director fees.












The parties, by executing this Agreement, hereby agree to the terms stated herein.







 


	
DIRECTOR:

	 	
THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
By:

	 
	 	 	
 


Title:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 57 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 57

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to facilitate the 
    immigration to the United States of certain aliens born in the 
   Philippines or Japan who were fathered by United States citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to facilitate the 
    immigration to the United States of certain aliens born in the 
   Philippines or Japan who were fathered by United States citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 
204(f)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1154(f)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(I)'' after ``born''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``subsection,'' the following: 
        ``(II) in the Philippines after 1950 and before November 24, 
        1992, or (III) in Japan after 1950 and before the date of 
        enactment of this subclause,''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001108373
<NAME>                        essentialsystems.com, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Nov-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Dec-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   May-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,740
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,740
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       600
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,740
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               14,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,360)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
#### Jesse GOMEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28386.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1956.

*658Joe P. Hatchitt, Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the possession of marijuana; the punishment, four years.

Officer Jackson of the Narcotic Division of the Corpus Christi Police Department testified that as he entered La Cita Bar on the night in question he noticed the appellant, whom he had been informed was in possession of marijuana, starting toward the door and instructed his fellow officer to intercept him; that the appellant reached in his pocket and threw a penny match box five or six feet away; that he picked up the match box and, upon examining the same, determined that it contained a number of marijuana cigarettes. Jackson stated that the following day, in company with the appellant, he went to the appellant’s home, where the appellant delivered to him a container of bulk marijuana.

It was stipulated that the chemists from the Department of Public Safety, if present, would testify that the substance seized by Officer Jackson and submitted to them for examination was marijuana.

The appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in his own behalf. We find the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

We shall discuss the contentions advanced in appellant’s brief.

The offense was alleged to have occurred in March, 1954. The trial was held in February, 1956. On cross-examination of Officer Jackson, appellant’s counsel asked if he had not been endeavoring for the last two years to get another case against the appellant. The officer answered that he had checked on him from time to time and watched him through field glasses. He was then asked why he was interested in the appellant, and the officer answered that he was interested in “anyone who has a past record.” Appellant contends that this last answer constituted proof that the appellant was a criminal generally. With this, we cannot agree. The officer was obviously referring to the instant offense, which was some time in coming to trial.

Appellant next contends that the search of the appellant’s home on the day following was unauthorized because Officer Jackson had no search warrant. Jackson stated that appellant voluntarily went with him to appellant’s home and handed the bulk marijuana to him from where it was concealed. He stated the appellant gave *659his permission to search his residence, to prevent us from disturbing his wife and to save us having, to save from having his house messed up, which is usually done in a search.” Since the appellant did not testify, this is all the evidence on the question of consent. We could not hold as a matter of law that consent was not shown.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit














Exhibit 10.66






3805 Old Easton Road    │    Doylestown, PA    │    United States 18902    │    Tel: 267.893.6650 │    www.arbutusbio.com






November 17, 2016




Personal and Confidential




Bill Symonds
103 Hardenbrook Court Cary, NC
USA, 27519






Dear Bill:


Effective November 15, 2016, your employment with Arbutus Biopharma Corp. (formerly Tekmira Pharmaceuticals Corp.) has been transferred to Arbutus Biopharma, Inc. Except for being employed by Arbutus Biopharma, Inc., all other terms of your employment will remain the same, as set forth in your Agreement to Serve as Chief Development Officer entered into as of May 29, 2015.




Very truly yours,


ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA, INC.





Mark J Murray President & CEO
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Live Current Media Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Geoffrey Hampson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.









/s/ C. Geoffrey Hampson


C. Geoffrey Hampson


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


August 16, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: August 9, 2005



/s/    DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. Passeri President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 471 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 471

  To provide for the payment to States of plot allowances for certain 
 veterans eligible for burial in a national cemetery who are buried in 
                       cemeteries of such States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 23 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

 Mr. Biden (for himself, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. Hollings, Mr. Roth, and Mr. 
   Stevens) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the payment to States of plot allowances for certain 
 veterans eligible for burial in a national cemetery who are buried in 
                       cemeteries of such States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT OF PLOT OR INTERMENT ALLOWANCE.

    Section 2303 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection;
    ``(c)(1) Subject to paragraph (3) of this subsection, the Secretary 
shall pay to any State, or agency or political subdivision of such 
State, a plot or interment allowance of $150 for the burial of any 
veteran who--
            ``(A) is eligible for burial in a national cemetery under 
        section 2402 of this title; and
            ``(B) is buried (without charge for the cost of a plot or 
        interment) in a cemetery, or a section of a cemetery, that--
                    ``(i) is used solely for the interment of persons 
                eligible for burial in a national cemetery; and
                    ``(ii) is owned by such State, or agency or 
                political subdivision.
    ``(2) The payment of a plot or interment allowance under this 
subsection shall be in addition to any benefits provided under section 
2303 or 2307 of this title, or subsection (a) of this section.
    ``(3) The Secretary may not pay a plot or interment allowance under 
this subsection for the burial of any veteran for which the Secretary 
pays a plot or interment allowance under subsection (b)(1) of this 
section.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Fetal Programming and Aging.                    

*Date:*                         February 27, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kaitlyn Noel Lewis Hardell, Ph.D., M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2E405, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 555-1234,                         *kaitlyn.hardell@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 30, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-02123 Filed 2-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT
      23**















**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**









Merisel,
      Inc.


New
      York,
      New York




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-8 (Nos. 33-61592, 333-49595, 333-44605 and 33-63021) of Merisel, Inc. of
      our
      report dated August 19, 2005, relating to the consolidated financial statements,
      which is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.







/s/
      BDO
      Seidman, LLP


New
      York,
      NY




October
      6, 2005