alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 317

To stop the waste of taxpayer funds on activities by Government agencies

to encourage its employees or officials to accept homosexuality as a

legitimate or normal lifestyle.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To stop the waste of taxpayer funds on activities by Government agencies to encourage its employees or officials

to accept homosexuality as a legitimate or normal lifestyle.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF APPROPRIATED

4 FUNDS.

5 No funds appropriated out of the Treasury of the

6 United States may be used by any entity to fund, promote,

7 or carry out any seminar or program for employees of the

8 Government, or to fund any position in the Government,
2

•S 317 IS

1 the purpose of which is to compel, instruct, encourage,

2 urge, or persuade employees or officials to—

3 (1) recruit, on the basis of sexual orientation,

4 homosexuals for employment with the Government;

5 or

6 (2) embrace, accept, condone, or celebrate ho7 mosexuality as a legitimate or normal lifestyle.

Æ
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 13-3382

___________________________ Charles A. Winston lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v. Theaster Petty, Kitchen Supervisor, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Lahan Ester, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Ea st Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Greg Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regiona l Unit, ADC; James Gibon, Disciplinary

Hearing Administrator, ADC; Larry D. May, Chief Deputy Director, ADC; Ray Hobbs, Director, ADC lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________ Submitted: June 20, 2014 Filed: June 23, 2014 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Arkansas inmate Charles Winst on appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Theaster Petty, a kitchen supervisor with the Arkansas Department of Correction (ADC), and various other ADC employees. After careful review, we conclude that Winston’s retalia tory discipline claim failed as a matter of law because Petty’s disciplinary report pr ovides some evidence that Winston actually violated prison rules. Cf. Hartsfield v. Nichols , 511 F.3d 826, 831 (8th Cir. 2008) (report from correctional officer, even if di sputed by inmate and supported by no other evidence, legally suffices as some evid ence upon which to base prison disciplinary violation, if violation is found by impartia l decisionmaker). We also conclude that Winston cannot create a genuine issue of ma terial fact as to his hearing officer’s impartiality based only on the allegation that Winston had previously filed grievances against the hearing officer. See Meuir v. Greene Cnty. Jail Emps. , 487 F.3d 1115, 1119 (8th Cir. 2007) (in case of retaliatory discipline, merely a lleging that act was retaliatory is insufficient). We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Winston’s pending motion for appointment of counsel.

______________________________

1 The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-K Annual Report of Mandalay Resort Group (the "Company") for the annual period ended January 31, 2003
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 30, 2003 |  | /s/GLENN SCHAEFFERGlenn Schaeffer, President, Chief
Financial Officer and
Treasurer of Mandalay Resort Group
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Mandalay Resort Group and will be retained by Mandalay Resort Group and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
NUMBER 13-10-00269-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

JOHN T. HANNIGAN, C.R.N.A. AND 

FRED L. PEREZ, M.D., Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 398th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on October 29, 2010. On

November 9, 2010, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been 

timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of 
2

receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not 

significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response 

has been received from appellant. 

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a 

motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 16th

day of December, 2010.
#### Robert Lee ROWE, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 25, 1966.

*731Robert Lee Rowe, pro se,

Robert Matthews, Harold T. Hotopp, Frankfort, for appellee.

HILL, Judge.

Rowe appeals from a judgment overruling without a hearing his motion under RCr 11.42 to vacate a judgment entered July 12,1963, under which he received a life sentence for armed assault with intent to rob.

The following two grounds are set out in the motion to vacate:

> (1) “Movant should have been advised that he was not allowed to enter a plea of guilty on a capital offense especially without the knowledge of a jury.

> (2) “Movant charges that he was coerced into a confession. * * * ”

The judgment appealed from recites that appellant filed a similar motion to vacate on September 26, 1963, on which he was given a hearing November 1963 at which movant personally appeared. The first motion was overruled during the same term in which he had his first hearing.

RCr 11.42 provides that: “Final disposition of the motion shall conclude all issues that could reasonably have been presented in the same proceeding.” This court said in Schroader v. Thomas, Ky., 387 S.W.2d 312 (1964) : “We are not required to spin our wheels reviewing post-conviction actions repeating in effect similar actions by the same petitioners asserting similar grounds for relief.”

No appeal was prosecuted from the judgment overruling his first motion to vacate. Nevertheless, we have carefully examined the two arguments made by appellant and the letter of the commonwealth’s attorney and find no merit in either. The net effect of the promise of the commonwealth’s attorney was to recommend leniency on condition he would “tell the whole facts” on the trial of his codefendants. This letter was written after his conviction and while he was in prison. The promise contained in the letter had nothing to do with the entry of his guilty plea. The leniency referred to therein, we believe, pertained to recommendations for parole as the letter goes on to say, “should you desire and make up your mind to tell the whole facts, I am sure that it would be to your interest to do so.”

The judgment is affirmed.
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 4438
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 2 of 26 PageID #: 4439
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 3 of 26 PageID #: 4440
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 4 of 26 PageID #: 4441
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 5 of 26 PageID #: 4442
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 6 of 26 PageID #: 4443
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 7 of 26 PageID #: 4444
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 8 of 26 PageID #: 4445
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 9 of 26 PageID #: 4446
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 10 of 26 PageID #: 4447
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 11 of 26 PageID #: 4448
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 12 of 26 PageID #: 4449
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 13 of 26 PageID #: 4450
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 14 of 26 PageID #: 4451
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 15 of 26 PageID #: 4452
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 16 of 26 PageID #: 4453
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 17 of 26 PageID #: 4454
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 18 of 26 PageID #: 4455
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 19 of 26 PageID #: 4456
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 20 of 26 PageID #: 4457
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 21 of 26 PageID #: 4458
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 22 of 26 PageID #: 4459
s/ Richard G. Kopf

22nd December

Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 23 of 26 PageID #: 4460
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 24 of 26 PageID #: 4461
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 25 of 26 PageID #: 4462
Case 4:10-cv-04017-RGK Document 214 Filed 12/22/11 Page 26 of 26 PageID #: 4463
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO OPTEK
CORPORATION'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                                 71,245
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         105,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                            5,709
<INVENTORY>                                            70,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      263,301
<PP&E>                                                 92,711
<DEPRECIATION>                                         29,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        580,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 195,709
<BONDS>                                                81,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  516
<OTHER-SE>                                            287,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          580,536
<SALES>                                               512,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      512,464
<CGS>                                                 276,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         276,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       30,861
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          629
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     10,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        72,106
<INCOME-TAX>                                           30,796
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    41,310
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           41,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.77
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 493 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 493

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
                documentation for the vessel CONSORTIUM.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, 
United States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
App. U.S.C. 883), as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation for the vessel CONSORTIUM, United States official number 
1029192.

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 493

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
                documentation for the vessel CONSORTIUM.
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 25, 2020 No. 04-19-00723-CV IN THE INTEREST OF W.A.F., A CHILD From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-15404 Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On July 2, 2020, we issued an order striking appellant’s brief for noncompliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and ordering appellant to file a corrected brief on or before July 31, 2020. To date, appellant has not filed a brief as ordered or a motion for extension of time. We, therefore, ORDER appellant to file, on or before September 8, 2020 , a brief in this appeal and a written response reasonably explaining (1) her failure to timely file a brief and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by her failure to timely file a brief. If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a); see also T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order).

_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 25th day of August, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 464 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 464

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 1995

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To make the reporting deadlines for studies conducted in Federal court 
    demonstration districts consistent with the deadlines for pilot 
                   districts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CIVIL JUSTICE EXPENSE AND DELAY REDUCTION 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 104 of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 471 
note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ``4-year period'' and 
        inserting ``5-year period''; and
            (2) in subsection (d) by striking ``December 31, 1995,'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 1996,''.

            Passed the Senate March 30 (legislative day, March 27), 
      1995.

            Attest:

                                               SHEILA P. BURKE,

                                                             Secretary.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 467 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 467

 For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 23 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

   Mr. Bond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 For the relief of Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDING AND PURPOSE.

    (a) Finding.--Congress finds that Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., of 
St. Louis, Missouri, satisfactorily performed emergency work in 
California after the Northridge earthquake on January 17, 1994, but has 
not been reimbursed as a result of a technicality under California 
State law.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of this Act is to fairly compensate 
Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the work for which, except for the 
technicality under California State law, Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., 
would otherwise have been paid under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).

SEC. 2. PAYMENT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
shall pay to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., of St. Louis, Missouri, an 
amount equal to the total amount owed to Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., by 
the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the State of California to 
compensate Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., for the emergency work and 
services performed at the request of the Southern California Regional 
Rail Authority, to the extent that the work and services are otherwise 
eligible for reimbursement under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief 
and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.). The payment 
shall be made from funds made available to carry out the Act.
    (b) Deobligation of Funds.--The Director of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency shall deobligate an amount equal to the amount 
obligated prior to the date of enactment of this Act for payment to the 
State of California to cover the costs of emergency work and services 
performed at the request of the Southern California Regional Rail 
Authority by Benchmark Rail Group, Inc., after the Northridge 
earthquake on January 17, 1994, that would have been eligible for 
reimbursement under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:




1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2012 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Claude GermainClaude GermainCo-Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 10, 2012




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2000, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,140
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (51,140)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,985
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,985)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,985)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>