alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EquationAnnual EnergyConsumptionAnnual EnergyConsumption4-34-104-174-244-254-284-334-34Correct EquationLL0.33XBiH+0.67XBiiAnnualEnergyConsumption=(AnnualWalk-inEnergyFactor)X8760L0.33XBiHL+0.67XBiiAnnualEnergyConsumption=(AnnualWalk-inEnergyFactor)X8760Edp=Qcond,dp24hX1kwXEER1-ayX1000WEfp=Qcond,fp24hX1kwXEER1-ayX1000WEnf=Qcond,nf24hX1kwXEER1-ayX1000WBtuCdd-load=Pdd-tot,intX3.142EERW-h24hX1kwXEdd,thermal=Qcond,ddEER1-ayX1000WQcond-nd=∆TXAndXUndBtuCnd-load=Pnd-tot,intX3.142EERW-h24hX1kwXEnd,thermal=Qcond-ndEER1-ayX1000WCitations10 CFR Part 431.304(b)(8)(ii)10 CFR Part 431.304(b)(8)(iii)10 CFR Part 431,Appendix A to Subpart R,Section 4.1 (f)10 CFR Part 431,Appendix A to Subpart R,Section 4.2 (j)10 CFR Part 431,Appendix A to Subpart R,Section 4.3 (j)10 CFR Part 431,Appendix A to Subpart R,Section 4.4.3 (b)10 CFR Part 431,Appendix A to Subpart R,Section 4.4.4 (b)10 CFR Part 431,Appendix A to Subpart R,Section 4.5.1 (c)10 CFR Part 431,Appendix A to Subpart R,Section 4.5.3 (b)10 CFR Part 431,Appendix A to Subpart R,Section 4.5.4 (b)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SBI COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER  31,  1997  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. (In thousands, except per share amounts)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            22,228
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     10,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       86,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 118,160
<PP&E>                                         3,120,102
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (367,202)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,752,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            962,288
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                    8,365,000
<COMMON>                                           5,345
<OTHER-SE>                                    (6,377,399)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,955,234
<SALES>                                          411,033
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 544,662
<CGS>                                            180,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    797,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                82,637
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (693,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (693,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (693,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 30, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 30, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0484. KELLY RAMIREZ et al. v. SIERRA DANIELLE WEBB. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 12C065
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                          84,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                    12,000
<INVENTORY>                                     66,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               783,003
<PP&E>                                       1,170,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                 249,533
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,188,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,822,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          562,678
<PREFERRED>                                    537,905
<COMMON>                                     3,360,136
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,285,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,188,474
<SALES>                                      1,962,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,240,187
<CGS>                                        1,572,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,180,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,973,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,973,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,973,592)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.21)
        

</TABLE>
II

Calendar No. 82

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 475

[Report No. 104–60]

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel LADY HAWK.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 27 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

APRIL 18, 1995

Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of April 6 (legislative

day, April 5), 1995, by Mr. PRESSLER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

LADY HAWK.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
2

S 475 RS

1 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

2 for the vessel LADY HAWK, United States official num3 ber 961095.

Calendar No. 82

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 475

[Report No. 104–60]

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the

vessel LADY HAWK.

APRIL 18, 1995

Reported without amendment
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D. Gary Fife, President of Big Bear Gold Corporation, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Big Bear Gold Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 30, 2004

/s/ D. Gary Fife	D. Gary Fife
President (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Graham Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to In Veritas  Medical  Diagnostics,  Inc.  and will be retained by In
Veritas Medical  Diagnostics,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





December 15, 2006                          /s/ Graham Cooper
                                           -------------------
                                           Graham Cooper
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10636 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
JESUS GONZALEZ

- GARCIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 217

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jesus Gonzalez

- Garcia pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal. He was sentenced to 30 months of imprisonment to be followed by one year of imprisonment. Gonzalez

- Garcia has filed an unopposed motion for the summary disposition of his appeal.
In his first issue, Gonzalez

- Garcia contends that the district court violated his constitutional rights under the Confrontation Clause and Due

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set f orth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 13, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10636 Document: 00514833432 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/13/2019No. 18

- 10636

2 Process Clause when, in imposing his sentence, the court relied on information from the presentence report about his other criminal activity. He conced es that the issue is foreclosed by this court’s decisions in United States v. Beydoun , 469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir. 2006), and United States v. Navarro , 169 F.3d 228, 236 (5th Cir. 1999). As Gonzalez

- Garcia observes, his rights under the Confrontation Clause do not extend to sentencing proceedings. See Beydoun , 469 F.3d at 108. Moreover, we have previously rejected that the denial of the right to confront witnesses at a sentencing hearing was a due process violation. S ee United States v. Salas , 182 F. App’x 282, 284 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2006). In his second issue, Gonzalez

- Garcia argues that his sentence exceeds the correct statutory maximum sentence of two years under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) because the statutory enhancement sc heme in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional

. He also argues that his guilty plea is involuntary and was accepted in violation of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 because he was not admonished that the fact of a prior conviction is an essential element of t he offense that the Government must prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Gonzalez

- Garcia concedes, though, that these issues are foreclosed by Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998)

. Gonzalez

- Garcia has raised these foreclosed issu es because he seeks to preserve them for possible further review. Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 18-10636 Document: 00514833432 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/13/2019
I am writing to request an extension of Exemption No. ----10603 issued to ALIN 

STEGLINSKI from certain requirements of § 121.311(b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption allowed ALIN STEGLINSKI to 

exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system 

(CARES, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint 

system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft. In addition, any air carrier 

operating under part 121 while ALIN STEGLINSKI was aboard its aircraft was 

also granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to 

allow ALIN STEGLINSKI to use an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft.

My SON is currently 22 year’s old, weighs 130 pounds, and is 5ft 3in tall. My

SON'S physical condition is as follows CEREBRAL PALSY. As a result of HIS 

physical condition, HE continues to need the support and security provided by an 

FAA-approved CRS, but because of HIS weight is incapable of compliance with 

the regulation. I am also submitting the following contact information: ALIN 

STEGLINSKI ALIN0STEGLINSKI@GMAIL.COM 19 N ASHLAND AVE 

PALATINE IL 60074-5401,

The original exemption allowed ALIN STEGLINSKI to occupy an FAA-approved 

CRS (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though HE exceeded the 

manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensured a high level of safety for ALIN 

STEGLINSKI and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew on the 

airplane. In fact, in ALIN STEGLINSKI’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the 

extra support and security that the FAA-approved CRS provides during the entire 

flight.

Enhancing safety for ALIN STEGLINSKI is in the public interest. In addition, the 

public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA-approved CRS 
allows HIM to use commercial air transportation. Without the support and 

security of the FAA-approved CRS, HEE would be unable to fly commercially. 

Since the original exemption was issued, there has been no change in the 

conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis 

for granting the original exemption.

If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an extension of an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the 

extent required for an individual to use an FAA-Approved Child Restraint System 

(CRS) on an aircraft, even though the individual exceeds the weight limits for the 

CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this 

FAA-approved CRS, this individual would be unable to fly. We request that this 

individual be allowed to occupy an FAA-approved CRS (CARES, manufactured 

by AmSafe, Inc.), even though the individual exceeds the manufacturer’s weight 

limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this individual is greatly enhanced 

by the extra support and security that the FAA-approved CRS will provide for this 

individual during the flight.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 6, 2010



/S/    DANIEL R.
PASSERIDaniel R. Passeri
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)




46
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR




RULE
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the quarterly report of New Green Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig
Huffman, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






Date:
      May 20, 2009
              By:
              /s/  
      Craig HuffmanCraig
      HuffmanChief
      Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA CENTENO-MUNGUIA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71747

Agency No. A094-895-561

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

Maria Centeno-Munguia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for withholding of

FILED

JAN 29 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for

review and remand. 

In denying Centeno-Munguia’s withholding of removal claim, the agency

found Centeno-Munguia failed to establish past persecution or a likelihood of

future persecution on account of a protected ground. When the IJ and BIA issued

their decisions in this case, they did not have the benefit of this court’s decisions in

Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2013) (en banc), Cordoba v.

Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir. 2013), and Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077

(9th Cir. 2014), or the BIA’s decisions in Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227

(BIA 2014), and Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Thus, we

remand Centeno-Munguia’s withholding of removal claim to determine the impact,

if any, of these decisions. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per

curiam). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

2 10-71747
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

I,Edileen Salicrup, the Chief Financial Officer of ClearComm, L.P., certify that(i) the December 31, 2004 10-K/A Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and (ii) the information contained in the December 31, 2004 10-K/AReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of ClearComm, L.P.

 
|   |   | /s/  Edileen Salicrup    |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Edileen  Salicrup        |   |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer |   |
|   |   | July  26, 2005           |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 5, 2009 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’squarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 5, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 20, 2009 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated November 6, 2006accompanying i) management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. as of August 31, 2006; ii) the consolidated financial statements of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2006 and 2005 and for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2006; iii) the consolidated balance sheet of Energy Transfer Partners GP, L.P. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2006; andiv) the consolidated balance sheet of Energy Transfer Partners, L.L.C. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2006, all included in the Annual Report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2006. We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. on Form S-4 (File No. 333-40407) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-136429, and 333-133176). 

/s/ GRANT THORTON LLP 

Tulsa, Oklahoma 

November 6, 2006