alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Russell SAUNDERS, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 14, 1955.

Baxter Arnett, Ashland, for appellant.

J. D. Buckman, Jr., Atty. Gen., Zeb A. Stewart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was fined $1,000 and sentenced to six months in jail for the offense of providing, keeping and maintaining a room in the City of Ashland where money was wagered on the outcome of baseball games in violation of KRS 436.440.

We have examined the record and find no substantial errors were made in the *trial.*

The judgment is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration under Section 309 of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended, and 13 CFR 107.1900 of the Code of Federal Regulations to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company license number 09/09-0471 issued to Pivotal Capital Fund, LP, said license is hereby declared null and void.

Bailey Devries,

Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation, United States Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2024-01456 Filed 1-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

A MENDED O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 49 0

- C V

Style: In the Interest of K.M.

, Child

Date motion filed * : J u ly 28 , 201 4

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for E xtension of T ime to F ile Appellant’ s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: August 4 , 201 4

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: August 4 , 2014

Date Requested: September 3 , 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: September 3, 2014

 No further extensions of time will be granted

.

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Th is Court’s August 12, 2014 Order on Motion is amended as follows : Th e

motion for extension of time is granted, but no further extensions will be

granted in this accelerated appeal in a parental termination case. Appellant’s

brief is to be filed no later than September 3, 2014.

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: August 26, 2014
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Theodore R. Maloney, certifythat:

1.                  TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”)of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of MediCor.

Date: July 24,2006
|        |   | /s/ Theodore R. Maloney |
|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |   | Theodore R. Maloney          |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer      |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 464 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 464

To make the reporting deadlines for studies conducted in Federal court 
    demonstration districts consistent with the deadlines for pilot 
                   districts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 23 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

   Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. Heflin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make the reporting deadlines for studies conducted in Federal court 
    demonstration districts consistent with the deadlines for pilot 
                   districts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CIVIL JUSTICE EXPENSE AND DELAY REDUCTION 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 104 of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 471 
note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ``4-year period'' and 
        inserting ``5-year period''; and
            (2) in subsection (d) by striking ``December 31, 1995,'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 1996,''.
                                 <all>
```
# E m p t y N e t M e d i a

, L L C

9 7 1 5 N F M 6 2 0 # 4 2 0 8

A u s t i n

, T X 7 8 7 2 6

5 1 2

- 5 2 2

- 9 7 7 1

S e p t e m b e r 0 4

, 2 0 X X

R e : E x e m p t i o n R e q u e s t S e c t i o n 3 3 3 o f t h e F A A R e f o r m A c t

D e a r S i r o r M a d a m : P u r s u a n t t o S e c t i o n 3 3 3 o f t h e F A A M o d e r n i z a t i o n a n d R e f o r m A c t o f

2 0 1 2 ( t h e R e f o r m A c t ) a n d 1 4 C

. F

. R

. P a r t 1 1

, E m p t y N e t M e d i a

, L L C

, a v i s u a l m e d i a p r o d u c t i o n

c o m p a n y

, h e r e b y a p p l i e s f o r a n e x e m p t i o n f r o m t h e l i s t e d F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n R e g u l a t i o n s

( “ F A R s ” ) t o a l l o w c o m m e r c i a l o p e r a t i o n o f i t s U A S 3 D R S o l o

, s o l o n g a s s u c h o p e r a t i o n s a r e

c o n d u c t e d w i t h i n a n d u n d e r t h e c o n d i t i o n s e s t a b l i s h e d b y t h e F A A a s r e q u i r e d b y S e c t i o n

3 3 3

. 1

.

S i n c e r e l y

,

J a m e s H e a d r i c k
The docket ID EPA-R07-SFUND-2014-0700 printed in the Federal Register for the notice entitled 

Proposed Prospective Purchaser Agreement Modification: Kansas City Structural Steel 

Superfund Site, Kansas City, KS, published on February 7, 2014, is a misprint. Please search for 

docket ID EPA-R07-SFUND-2014-0070.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 493

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation for the vessel CONSORTIUM.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 493 ES

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTIFICATE OF DOCU2 MENTATION.

3 Notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel CONSORTIUM, United States official num9 ber 1029192.

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 493

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

CONSORTIUM.issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### April 22, 2011 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ROGER LEE REED, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. CAROL HOLINKA, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 10-3334 (D.C. No. 5:08-CV-03209-RDR) (D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before MURPHY , HARTZ , and GORSUCH , Circuit Judges.
Roger Lee Reed appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition seeking early release from federal prison. We affirm. Mr. Reed was convicted under Kansas law for committing theft while on probation. The state court imposed a prison sentence of fifty-seven months. Shortly after his state conviction, Mr. Reed pled guilty in federal court to illegal possession of a firearm. The court sentenced him to thirty-six months to run-2- consecutively to his state sentence. On May 31, 2007, while serving his state sentence, Mr. Reed was erroneously transferred to federal custody. Upon discovering this administrative error, federal authorities promptly returned him to Kansas. On April 3, 2009, Mr. Reed completed his state sentence and was transferred back to federal custody to serve out his federal sentence. Time mistakenly spent in federal custody was credited against his state sentence. On appeal, Mr. Reed makes two arguments for early release. First, he contends his federal sentence actually commenced on May 31, 2007 (not April 3, 2009) when he was erroneously transferred to federal custody. Second, he says he should have received credit against his federal sentence for time served before April 3, 2009. The district court rejected both these arguments. Relying on Binford v. United States , 436 F.3d 1252 (10th Cir. 2006), and Stroble v. Terrell , 200 F. App’x 811 (10th Cir. 2006) (unpublished), the court held that Mr. Reed’s federal sentence commenced on April 3. See18 U.S.C. § 3585(a). Moreover, it held that no time served before April 3 could be credited against his federal sentence because that time had already been credited against his state sentence.
See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b). After reviewing the record ourselves, we cannot disagree with the district court. Accordingly, and for substantially the same reasons given by the court in its thorough order, we affirm the denial of-3- Mr. Reed’s habeas petition and deny his “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Summary Judgment Rule 56 (a - g).”

Entered for the Court

Neil M. Gorsuch Circuit Judge
## SteadiDron e Mavrik Training Outline

3/11 /15

AUV Proprietary & Competition Sensitive. File Securely. Page 1 of 2 

### OBJECTIVE

To provide complete multirotor training to operate safely. This course will include general pilot

knowledge to satisfy the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to allow commercial UAS

operators to operate in the National Airspace . At the completion of this course, students will

also be OEM Certified.



### CLASS REQUIREMENTS

Adequate classroom environment with presentation equipment. For practical exercises, the

multirotor platforms to be used should be available for both classroom and field environments.

Provide a field environment with two instructors. Field needs to be free of obstructions and

personnel.



### STUDENT MATERIALS

Flash Drive Including:

o Pilot’s Handbook of Aer onautical Knowledge

o Aviation Weather

o Aviation Weather Services

o FAR/AIM (Most Current)

o Aircraft Operating Manuals

o Aircraft Checklists

Pilot Logbook

Binder with a hard copy of presentations with notes column



### TIMELINE

5 days of classroom

2 days of practical aircraft training and exercises

## SteadiDron e Mavrik Training Outline

3/11 /15

AUV Proprietary & Competition Sensitive. File Securely. Page 2 of 2 

### DAY 1: 0800

– 0830 Morning I ntroduction

0830

– 0930 Lesson 1 : How does a Multirotor Fly

0930

– 0945 Break

0945

– 12 05 Lesson 2: Regulations

1205

– 1305 Lunch

1300

– 1430 Lesson 3: Airspace

1430

– 14 45 Break

1445

– 1545 Lesson 3: Airspace



### DAY 2: 0800

– 0900 Lesson 4 : ADM

1000

– 1045 Lesson 5 : Weather Theory

1045

– 1100 Break

1100

– 12 00 Less on 5 : Weather Theory

1200

– 13 00 Lunch

13 00

– 1 335 Lesson 5 : Weather Theory

1335

– 1420 Lesson 6 : Weather Services

1420

– 1435 Break

1435

– 1510 Lesson 6 : Weather Services



### DAY 3 : 0800

– 0900 Lesson 7 : Radio Communications

0900

– 0915 Break

0915

– 1015 Lesson 7 : Radio Communications

1015

– 1115 Lesson 8 : How to fly Multirotors

11 15

– 12 15 Lunch

1215

– 13 15 Lesson 9 : Blade 180QX

1315

– 13 30 Break

13 30

– 1500 Meet the Aircraft (Blade 180QX)



### DAY 4 : 0800

– 0900 Review

0900

– 1000 Open Book Exam

1000

– 1015 Break

1015

– 1100 Logbooks

1100

– 1200 Lunch

1200

– 1300 Lesson 1 0 : Mission Planner Overview

1300

– 1315 Break

1315

– 1415 Lesson 1 0 : Mission Planner Overview

1415

– 1515 Lesson 11 : SteadiDrone FLARE

1415

– 1530 Meet the Aircraft ( Mavrik )



### DAY 5 : 0800

– 1100 Blade Practical Exercises

1100

– 1200 Lunch

1200

– 160 0 FLARE Practical Exercises



### DAY 6 : 0800

– 1100 Quiz on Mavrik Set

- up & Procedures

1100

– 1200 Lunch

1200

– 1600 Mavrik Practical Exercises

1600

– 1700 Course Critique and Certificates
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 441 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 441

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian 
  Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS.

  Sections 409(e), 410(h), and 411(i) of the Indian Child Protection 
and Family Violence Prevention Act (25 U.S.C. 3208(e), 3209(h), and 
3210(i), respectively) are each amended by striking ``and 1995'' and 
inserting ``1995, 1996, and 1997''.

            Passed the Senate April 26 (legislative day, April 24), 
      1995.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 441

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian 
  Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
Exhibit









Exhibit 4.5



CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
SPIRIT REALTY, L.P.


The undersigned, desiring to form a limited partnership pursuant to the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6 Delaware Code, Chapter 17, does hereby certify as follows:
FIRST.        The name of the limited partnership is Spirit Realty, L.P.
SECOND.    The address of the registered office of Spirit Realty, L.P. in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, Delaware 19801, and the name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company. 
THIRD.    The name and business address of the general partner is as follows:
SPIRIT GENERAL OP HOLDINGS, LLC 
14631 No. Scottsdale Road, Suite 200 
Scottsdale, AZ 85254·2711
FOURTH.    This Certificate of Limited Partnership shall be effective at 7:00 A.M. eastern time on September 25, 2012. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Limited Partnership of Spirit Realty, L.P. this 24 day of September, 2012.
SPIRIT GENERAL OP HOLDINGS, LLC,
As general partner of Spirit Realty, L.P.




By:    /s/ Peter M. Mavoides                
Name:    Peter M. Mavoides
Title:    President
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Publicaciones E. Impresos Paso Del Norte 

S. De R.L. De C.V. and Publicaciones 

Paso del Norte, S.A. De C.V., 

 

 Appellants,

Javier Corral Jurado,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No.08-22-00044-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2020DCV0919)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until August 24, 2022. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Francisco J. Ortega, the Appellee’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before August 24, 2022. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25

th day of July, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 527 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 527

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel EMPRESS.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                March 9 (legislative day, March 6), 1995

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel EMPRESS.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel EMPRESS, (United States official number 975018).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nolan K. Bushnell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


November 29, 2006                                     By: /s/ NOLAN K. BUSHNELL
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Nolan K. Bushnell
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
10.13


 


Guaranty
of Funding


 


This
Guaranty of Funding is made as of March 7, 2017 by _______________, an individual having a business address at ____________________
(the “Guarantor”) in favor of JENSYN ACQUISITION CORP., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company has issued to the Guarantor a promissory note dated March 7, 2017 (the “Note”) which contemplates that
the Guarantor may loan to the Company up to Four Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars ($425,000) on the terms and conditions set
forth on the Note;


 


WHEREAS,
Jeffrey J. Raymond, Rebecca Irish and Peter Underwood (the “Other Guarantors”) have each executed a Guaranty of Funding
in form and substance substantially identical to this Guaranty of Funding (the “Other Guarantees”);


 


WHEREAS,
as of the date hereof, the Guarantor has loaned an aggregate of Two Hundred Seventeen Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Dollars ($217,330)
to the Company;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the Guarantor and the Company hereby agree as follows:


 


	1.	Guaranty
    of Funding. The Guarantor hereby agrees that if a request for funding under the Note is made by the Company (after approval
    of any such request by a majority of the members of the Company’s Board of Directors), the Guarantor will fund such
    loan request within fifteen (15) days of the date of the request provided that (i) the sum of the amount requested and the
    principal amount then outstanding under the Note shall not exceed the Maximum Commitment (as defined below) and (ii) each
    of the Other Guarantors funds a loan request in an equal or greater amount pursuant to the Other Guarantees. The Maximum Commitment
    shall be (i) $325,000 from the date of this Guaranty of Funding through October 1, 2017, (ii) $375,000 from October 2, 2017
    through January 1, 2018 and (iii) $425,000 from January 2, 2018 through April 1, 2018.
	 	 
	2.	Extension
    of Business Combination. The Company agrees that the Company shall not extend the date by which it shall consummate its
    initial Business Combination (as defined in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation) without
    the prior written consent of the Guarantor.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Guaranty of Funding as of the date first above written.


 






	 	 
	 	Name
    of Guarantor









 


	 	JENSYN ACQUISITION CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	              
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title: