alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

THOMAS K. MARRA,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent

______________________ 

2022-1919

______________________ 

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. NY-0752-21-0039-I-1.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

RAYMOND R. GRANGER, Granger & Associates LLC, 

New York, NY, argued for petitioner. 

 ANNE DELMARE, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BRIAN 

M. BOYNTON, TARA K. HOGAN, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

Case: 22-1919 Document: 41 Page: 1 Filed: 08/09/2023
ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (CHEN, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

August 9, 2023 

Date

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1919 Document: 41 Page: 2 Filed: 08/09/2023
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

December 18, 2014

Hon. Luis A. Gonzalez

Hidalgo County Courthouse

Assistant District Attorney

100 N. Closner

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Rene A. Guerra

Criminal District Attorney

Hidalgo County Courthouse

100 N. Closner, Room 303

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Oscar Rene Flores

Attorney at Law

1308 South 10th Ave.

Edinburg, TX 78539

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-12-00783-CR

Tr.Ct.No. CR-733-12-D

Style: CARLOS DELGADO REYES v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: 206th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Laura Hinojosa, Hidalgo County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

State Prosecuting Attorney (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 19

- 00690

- CV

Beatriz CARVALHO and AJ Lopez Trucking,

Appellants

v.

Cynthia DEHOYOS

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI04017

Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed : January 22, 2020

DIS MISSED

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that the parties

have reach an agreement in the underlying lawsuit. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). Costs of appeal are taxed against the party incurring same

. See id.

42.1(d).

PER CURIAM
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00811-CR

Ray Roland BERNAL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR10961

Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 4, 2012

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea 

bargain, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the 

prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s certification accurately 

reflects that the underlying case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be dismissed if a 
04-11-00811-CR

- 2 -

certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part of the record 

under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Because the trial court’s certification does not show 

that the appellant has a right of appeal, rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Marshall D. Sorokwasz, certify that:1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2006 ofImpreso, Inc. (the “Report”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by the Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the Report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.6. Item 4 Controls and Procedures in the registrant’s Form 10-Q is incorporated hereinby reference.     Date: July 17, 2006   /s/ Marshall D. Sorokwasz         **Marshall D. Sorokwasz**    **Chief Executive Officer and President**
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 7- 20 70

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ BradSte ph en Fran ci s; Ch ris ti ne Caro l Fr an ci s ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff s - Ap pe ll an ts

v. Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll ee

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Decem

be r 28 , 20 17 Fi le d: Jan ua ry

3, 2 01 8 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BENTON, BOW MAN, an d KELLY, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Brad an d Ch ris ti ne Fran ci s ap pe a l f r o m th e or de r of th e Dis tri ct Co ur t 1 di sm is si ng th ei r ci vi l su it ch al le ng in g th ei r li ab il it y fo r fed eral ta xe s an d pe na lt ie s un de r th e In te rn al Rev en ue Co de

. Afte r care fu l rev ie w, we co nc lu de th at di sm i s s a l w as pr op er fo r th e reas on s ex pl ai ne d by t he di st ric t co ur t. See LeMay v . U.S. Po st al Serv

. , 4 50 F.3 d 79 7, 79 9 (8 th Ci r. 20 06 ) (s ta nd ard of rev ie w). The jud gm en t is affi rm ed

. See 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

1 The Hon or ab le Greg Kay s, Ch ie f Ju dg e, Uni te d Stat es Dis tri ctCo ur t fo r th e W es te rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i. -2

-
SCWC-19-0000138

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JUSTIN P. NAMAUU,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-19-0000138; 2CPC-18-0000399

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Justin P. Namauu’s

application for writ of certiorari, filed on November 29, 2019,

is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 16, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-19-0000138

16-JAN-2020

09:45 AM
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nolan. Bushnell, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

(1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.



August 16, 2004                         By:      /s/ Nolan K Bushnell
                                           ------------------------------------
                                                 Nolan K. Bushnell
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 533 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 533

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 1995

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal court, and 
                          for other purposes.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL.

    The first sentence of section 1447(c) of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``any defect in removal procedure'' and 
inserting ``any defect other than lack of subject matter 
jurisdiction''.
            Passed the Senate June 30 (legislative day, June 19), 1995.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 7405)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; National Centers for Translational Research in Reproduction and Infertility (P50 Clinical Trial Optional) (ZHD1 DSR-Z (55)), March 28, 2024, 9 a.m. to March 29, 2024, 5 p.m., NICHD, 6710 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 25, 2024, 89 FR 4966, FR Doc. 2024-01422.                

Dr. Nanda has had to change the date of his ZHD1 DSR-Z (55) review meeting from 3/28 & 3/29 to 4/11 & 4/12. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: January 30, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-02124 Filed 2-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.71


                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE
                             ----------------------



$80,000                                                           March 24, 1997


          For value received, John E. Denson ("Maker"), promises to pay on
demand at any time on or after March 25, 1997 to the order of Coinmach
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, the aggregate principal amount of $80,000.

          No interest shall accrue on the outstanding principal amount of this
promissory note (the "Note").

          This Note is secured by certain real property owned by Maker and
located at 111 Cove Lane, Media, Pennsylvania 19063.

          In the event Maker fails to pay any amounts due hereunder when due (an
"Event of Default"), Maker shall pay to the holder hereof, in addition to such
amounts due, all costs of collection, including reasonable attorneys' fees and
court costs.

          Maker or his successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence,
presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and non-
payment of this Note, and expressly agrees that this Note, or any payment
hereunder, may be extended from time to time and that the holder hereof may
accept security for this Note or release security for this Note, all without in
any way affecting the liability of Maker hereunder.  Maker also waives all
rights to notice and hearing of any kind upon the occurence of an Event of
Default and prior to the exercise by the holder of this Note of its rights to
repossess the Collateral without judicial process or to replevy, attach or levy
upon the Collateral without notice or hearing.

          This Note shall be governed by and construed in all respects according
to the internal laws of the State of New York without regard to conflicts of law
provisions.



                                                By: /s/ John E. Denson
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    John E. Denson
Calendar No. 284

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 426

[Report No. 104–190]

To authorize the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity to establish a memorial to

Martin Luther King, Jr., in the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 15 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. SARBANES (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Mr. HOLLINGS, Mr. ROBB, Mr.

GRAHAM, Mrs. BOXER, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. MACK, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr.

PACKWOOD, Mr. MCCAIN, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. KOHL, Mr.

FEINGOLD, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. DODD, Mr. INOUYE,

Mr. SIMON, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. PELL, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. HARKIN,

Mr. BUMPERS, Mr. KERRY, Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr.

D’AMATO, and Mr. LEVIN) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Reported by Mr. WARNER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity to establish

a memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr., in the District

of Columbia, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 426 RS

1 SECTION 1. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR., MEMORIAL.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—

3 (1) ESTABLISHMENT.—Subject to subsection

4 (b), the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity is authorized to

5 establish a memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr., in

6 the District of Columbia and its environs in accord7 ance with the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide stand8 ards for placement of commemorative works on cer9 tain Federal lands in the District of Columbia and

10 its environs, and for other purposes’’, approved No11 vember 14, 1986 (40 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.), to honor

12 Martin Luther King, Jr.

13 (2) DEFINITION.—For purposes of paragraph

14 (1), the term ‘‘the District of Columbia and its envi15 rons’’ has the same meaning given to the term by

16 section 2(e) of the Act (40 U.S.C. 1002(e)).

17 (b) NO EXPENSE TO THE UNITED STATES.—The

18 United States shall not pay any of the expenses of estab19 lishing the memorial under subsection (a).

Calendar No. 284

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 426

[Report No. 104–190]

A BILL

To authorize the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity to esposes. in the District of Columbia, and for other pur- tablish a memorial to Martin Luther King, Jr.,

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:

/s/ Robert L. Howard-AndersonName:

Robert L. Howard-AndersonTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




I, Howard M.
Bailey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:

/s/ Howard M. BaileyName:

Howard M. BaileyTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
1Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-30720

Summary Calendar

ROBERT P. ROUGEAU

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., LLOYD DAIGLE, 

JAKE LIPARI, UNIDENTIFIED PARTY

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-3205-N)

December 24, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Appellant Rougeau sued his employer and others alleging denial

of employment benefits and wrongful discharge. His claims were

dismissed by the district court by the granting of several motions

for summary judgment. Appellant appeals contending that the

district court erred in concluding that the decision by the benefit
2

plan’s Administrator was supported by adequate evidence, and by

concluding that the Labor Management Relations Act precluded his

claims for breach of the collective bargaining agreement by his

union and Defendants. Appellant also complains of the court’s

refusal to permit an amendment to his pleadings, and of its

reliance on decisions of this court he considers to have been

wrongly decided.

We have carefully examined the briefs, record and the district

court’s carefully crafted Order and Reasons of January 4, 1997 and

of June 25, 1997. We find no error or abuse of discretion by the

district court and affirm essentially for the reasons she carefully

articulated in her two referenced rulings.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0620

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

STEVEN JAMES CLIFTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 24, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 18 2022

07/18/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0620
<PAGE>


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-05111, 333-33013 
and 333-42073) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-08519 and 333-31599) of our report 
dated February 11, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial 
statements of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 
and for each of the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which 
report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                       PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 25, 1999