alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 583 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                 S. 583

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
     documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for two vessels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, 
United States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
App. U.S.C. 883), as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with a coastwise endorsement for each of the vessels 
RESOLUTION (Serial Number 77NS8701) and PERSERVERANCE (Serial Number 
77NS8901).

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 583

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
     documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for two vessels.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8729-8730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02537]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 8, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.

[[Page 8730]]

3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 178 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-171, CP2024-177.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-02537 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, TimBurroughs, certify that:

 

(1)   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of TBX Resources,Inc.;

 

(2)   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;

 

(3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

(4)   The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this quarterlyreport (“Evaluation Date”); and

 

(c)   Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date:

 

(5)   The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the AuditCommittee of the Registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols, which could adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for theRegistrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls;and

 

(6)   The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisquarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of the most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Datedthis 15th day of April 2004

 
| /s/ Tim Burroughs                                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Tim Burroughs                                       |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ICG COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         210,831
<SECURITIES>                                    52,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,473
<INVENTORY>                                      2,821
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               422,827
<PP&E>                                       1,112,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                 177,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,625,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          127,893
<BONDS>                                      1,662,357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          466,352
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           584
<OTHER-SE>                                   (631,761)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1,625,425
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              397,619
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 254,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              291,622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               12,031
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            170,127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (295,057)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (90)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (350,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (67,715)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (418,045)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (9.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.54

                              SCHEDULE OF MORTGAGES
                 WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF MORTGAGE
                            ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 10.53


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                                       DATE OF
    MORTGAGOR                          FACILITY NAME                    LOCATION              MORTGAGE AMOUNT          MORTGAGE
    ---------                          -------------                    --------              ---------------          --------
<S>                             <C>                              <C>                          <C>                <C> 
ALS Holdings, Inc.              Sterling House of Olathe II      751 North Somerset Terrace      $2,202,505      November 18, 1998
                                                                 Olathe, KS 66062

ALS Holdings, Inc.              Sterling House of Topeka         5820 S.W. Drury Lane            $2,992,500      November 18, 1998
                                                                 Topeka, KS 66604

ALS Holdings, Inc.              Sterling House of Lawrence       3220 Peterson Road              $3,210,000      November 18, 1998
                                                                 Lawrence, KS 66049

ALS Holdings, Inc.              Sterling House of Leawood        12720 State Line Road           $2,850,000      November 18, 1998
                                                                 Leawood, KS 66209

ALS Holdings, Inc.              Sterling House of Lenexa I       8710 Caenen Lake Road           $2,325,000      November 18, 1998
                                                                 Lenexa, KS 66215

ALS Holdings, Inc.              Sterling House of Lenexa II      8740 Caenen Lake Road           $2,325,000      November 18, 1998
                                                                 Lenexa, KS 66215

ALS Wisconsin                   Wynwood of Appleton              5800 Pennsylvania Avenue        $5,397,360      December 10, 1998
Holdings, Inc.*                                                  Grand Chute, WI

ALS Wisconsin                   Wynwood of Madison               1601 Wheeler Rd.                $4,012,500      December 10, 1998
Holdings, Inc.*                                                  Madison, WI
</TABLE>

* The form of mortgages entered into for these properties were conformed to meet
the requirements of Wisconsin law.
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Syms Corp
Secaucus, New Jersey




We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos.  2-9703,  333-44254 and 333-127399) of Syms Corp of
our  report  dated  April  20,  2006,  relating  to the  consolidated  financial
statements  and the  effectiveness  of Syms  Corp.  and  subsidiaries'  internal
control over  financial  reporting  which  appears in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
BDO Seidman, LLP
New York, New York
April 21, 2006
TO: CLERK OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS P 0 BOX 12303 CAPITAL STATION AUSTIN; TEXAS 787.11 

# 4^/^-oi-fcu^

12/23/2014



### RE' FILING DATES / NUMBERS / OUTCOMES OF C-3 0008220-0926958&-B-C-D-S-F-G-H ?.fR~65-469--01-02-03-Q4-05-06--07-0a

DEAR CLERK, 

### PLEASE wOfJLD 'YOU GIVE ME THE DATE3_NUMBERS_AND OUT-COMES OF THE ABOVE CIT^D AND REQUESTED CASES ? THANK YOU KINDLY'FOR YOCIR TIME, AND PATIENCE. SINCERLY,

PAIGE LOUIS BENNER #1278531 2101 FM 369 Nth ALLRSD UNIT 

## \ IOWA PARK, TEXAS 76367-6563 PS IF AT .ALL POSSIBLE COULD I PLEASE GET THE ORDER THAT WAS ISSUED FOR 092695cSH 

# fS - \t fa"6<x.

ccPERSONAi, FILE 

# RECEIVEDIN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS JAN 0 5 2015 AbelAcosta, Clerk. •CA
Union Calendar No. 92

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 464

[Report No. 104–180]

AN ACT

To make the reporting deadlines for studies conand for other purposes. consistent with the deadlines for pilot districts, ducted in Federal court demonstration districts

JULY 11, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
IB

Union Calendar No. 92

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 464

[Report No. 104–180]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 3, 1995

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JULY 11, 1995

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

To make the reporting deadlines for studies conducted in

Federal court demonstration districts consistent with the

deadlines for pilot districts, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CIVIL JUSTICE EXPENSE AND

4 DELAY REDUCTION DEMONSTRATION PRO5 GRAMS.

6 Section 104 of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990

7 (28 U.S.C. 471 note) is amended—
2

•S 464 RH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ‘‘4-year pe2 riod’’ and inserting ‘‘5-year period’’; and

3 (2) in subsection (d) by striking ‘‘December 31,

4 1995,’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 1996,’’.

Passed the Senate March 30 (legislative day, March

27), 1995.

Attest: SHEILA P. BURKE,

Secretary.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7147

HAROLD SMITH, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. No. 03-7608

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HAROLD SMITH, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-2456-13AK; CA-02-2456) Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: June 3, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.- 2 - No. 03-7147, dismissed; No. 03-7608, affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Harold Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Harold Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a certificate of appealability (No. 03-7147) and his motion for a copy of records at the government’s expense (No. 03-7608). As to No. 03-7147, a certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, in No. 03- 7147, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. As to No. 03-7608, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, in No. 03-7608, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeSmith v. United States , No. CA-02-2456 (D.S.C. Sept. 3, 2003). While we grant Smith leave to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 03-7608, we deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for abeyance in No. 03-7147. We also deny his motion to stay these appeals, his motion for injunctive relief, and his motion to consolidate these appeals with- 4 - two other cases. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 03-7147, DISMISSED

No. 03-7608, AFFIRMED
#### Hector G. ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 36458.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 5, 1964.

Joseph Chacon, San Antonio, for appellant.

James E. Barlow, Dist. Atty., James E. Hope, Asst. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDonald, judge.

The offense is theft of corporeal personal property over the value of $50.00; the punishment, 3 years confinement in the state penitentiary.

Appellant plead guilty to the offense charged, after being properly admonished as to the consequences of his plea by the Court. The record also reflects that the appellant properly waived a jury trial, through his attorney and in person.

The appellant relies on Pitcock v. State, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 223, 324 S.W.2d 866, in contending that there is not sufficient evidence to support his conviction on his-plea of guilty.

In the instant case, after his plea of guilty, appellant was placed on the stand and testified that each and every allegation contained in the indictment was true and correct; that he was the same Hector G. Alvarez named in said indictment, and that he took possession of the tape recorder, over the value of $50.00, without the owner’s consent and with the intent to appropriate it to his own use. He further testified that the theft in question took place in Bexar County, Texas.

*891We find this testimony of appellant, in conjunction with his plea of guilty, sufficient to support the conviction. The testimony of appellant from the witness stand is a judicial confession and as such needs no corroboration. Martin v. State, 109 Tex.Cr.R. 101, 3 S.W.2d 90; Guerra et al. v. State, 138 Tex.Cr.R. 120, 134 S.W.2d 679; Fancher v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 269, 319 S.W.2d 707; McCormick and Ray, Texas Law of Evidence, Vol. 2, Section 1223.

The Pitcock case, supra, relied upon by appellant, is easily distinguished from the case at bar, as in that case the appellants plead guilty but did not testify and thus a judicial confession was not present.

No reversible error appearing the judgment is affirmed.
EX-10.03



 Exhibit 10.03 
  





 
  

	To:	Jan Madsen 


	From:	West Corporation Compensation Committee 


	Date:	March 13, 2017 

  

	Re:	Exhibit A 

 This Exhibit A is delivered pursuant to your Employment Agreement and sets forth your 2017
base salary and incentive compensation applicable to your position as Chief Financial Officer for West Corporation. 
  

	 	1.	Your base salary for 2017 is $450,000 effective January 1, 2017. 

  

	 	2.	Effective January 1, 2017, you will be eligible to receive an annual incentive based upon West Corporation’s publicly reported consolidated revenue (“Revenue”), weighted at 20%, and publicly reported
Adjusted Earnings per Share from Continuing Operations – Diluted (“Adjusted EPS”), weighted at 80%, in each case, as adjusted pursuant to Section 3 below and subject to the cap set forth below. All calculations will be based on
2017 fiscal year results. Your incentive will be calculated as follows based upon an annual target incentive of $360,000: 

 Component
1: Incentive payout grid based on Revenue 
  

													
	 Revenue (In Mil$)
	 	  	Total
% of Target
Incentive Factor	 	 	% of Target
Incentive Paid
(20% Weighting)	 	 	 
	$	2,450.0	 	  	 	200	% 	 	 	40.0	% 	 	Maximum
	$	2,376.4	 	  	 	125	% 	 	 	25.0	% 	 	
	$	2,339.0	 	  	 	100	% 	 	 	20.0	% 	 	Target
	$	2,301.0	 	  	 	65	% 	 	 	13.0	% 	 	
	$	2,100.0	 	  	 	0	% 	 	 	0.0	% 	 	Threshold

 For the incentive payout based on Revenue, the amount paid will be extrapolated as needed between revenue range points to
the nearest tenth percent. 








 



 
  

 Component 2: Incentive payout grid based on Adjusted EPS 

 

													
	 Adjusted EPS
	 	  	Total
% of Target
Incentive Factor	 	 	% of Target
Incentive Paid
(80% Weighting)	 	 	 
	$	3.10	 	  	 	200	% 	 	 	160.0	% 	 	Maximum
	$	3.02	 	  	 	125	% 	 	 	100.0	% 	 	
	$	2.91	 	  	 	100	% 	 	 	80.0	% 	 	Target
	$	2.79	 	  	 	65	% 	 	 	52.0	% 	 	
	$	2.72	 	  	 	0	% 	 	 	0.0	% 	 	Threshold

 For each $.01 of Adjusted EPS: 

From $3.02 to $3.10, additional 7.5000% in % of Target Incentive Paid. 

From $2.91 to $3.02, additional 1.8182% in % of Target Incentive Paid. 

From $2.79 to $2.91, additional 2.3333% in % of Target Incentive Paid. 

From $2.72 to $2.79, additional 7.4286% in % of Target Incentive Paid. 

The maximum total incentive which may be earned pursuant to this Section 2 is $720,000 in the aggregate. 

 

	 	3.	For 2017 incentive calculations, Revenue and Adjusted EPS will be adjusted up or down to reflect the average foreign exchange rates for 2016. All metrics are based on West Corporation’s and its affiliates’
consolidated operations. Financial results arising from extraordinary items, mergers, acquisitions, and joint ventures completed during 2017 may be included in the incentive calculation on a case by case basis, as determined by the Compensation
Committee. Any resulting adjustment to Adjusted EPS will apply the same rounding conventions used for publicly reported Adjusted EPS. 

  

	 	4.	100% of the incentive earned will be paid annually, no later than March 15, 2018. 

  

	
	/s/ Jan Madsen
	Employee – Jan Madsen



  
 2
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

815 KA 09-00176
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM ALLEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (SUSAN C. AZZARELLI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a resentence of the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), rendered November 21, 2008. Defendant was resentenced upon his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and false personation.

It is hereby ORDERED that the resentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and now appeals from the resentence, contending that his waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and thus does not encompass his present challenge to the severity of the sentence. Although defendant validly waived the right to appeal at the plea proceeding ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), that waiver does not preclude him from challenging the sentence imposed upon resentencing ( see People v Gray , 32 AD3d 1052, 1053, lv denied 7 NY3d 902; People v Tausinger , 21 AD3d 1181, 1183; see generally People v Dexter , 71 AD3d 1504, 1504-1505, lv denied 14 NY3d 887; People v Rodriguez , 259 AD2d 1040). Nevertheless, on the merits, we conclude that the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: July 6, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court