alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iPCS, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| /s/ Timothy M. Yager                                                                 |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Timothy M. Yager, President and Chief Executive Officer                              |
| Date: August 1, 2008                                                            |
|                                                                                 |
|                                                                                 |
| /s/ Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr.                                                    |   |
| Stebbins B. Chandor, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial Officer |
| Date: August 1, 2008                                                            |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-18201) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan of TV Filme, Inc. of
our report  dated  March 31,  1998 with  respect to the  consolidated  financial
statements of TV Filme,  Inc.  included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1997.






                                   /s/ Ernst & Young
                                   Auditores Independentes, S.C.


Sao Paulo, Brazil
March 31, 1998
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Carlos F. Lucero, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Tenth **

Circuit, sitting by designation.

 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMEN APELYAN,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-77165

Agency No. A097-115-644

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2009 

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, LUCERO , and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. ** 

Armen Apelyan, a native and citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) decision upholding the adverse

credibility finding of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”), and the denial of petitioner’s

FILED

FEB 18 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (“CAT”). 

The BIA affirmed because both petitioner’s written application and hearing

testimony, that he was imprisoned in 1998 on suspicion of participation in a plot

for an assassination, were inconsistent with the historical record that the

assassination did not occur until 2000. The inconsistency went to the heart of his

claim, as our law requires in order to support an adverse credibility determination. 

Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 964 (9th Cir. 2004). 

When confronted at the hearing with the inconsistency, petitioner said there

had been a mistake in the translations and that he meant to say he was falsely

arrested for suspected planning, not participation. Neither the IJ nor the BIA

accepted the explanation and there was no compelling reason for them to do so. 

Don v. Gonzales, 476 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir. 2007). 

The petition for review is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 56 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 56

                For the relief of Susan Rebola Cardenas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Susan Rebola Cardenas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Susan Rebola 
Cardenas shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to 
the United States for permanent residence as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Susan Rebola Cardenas 
as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year 
the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country 
of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                      900
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            900
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            1,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    504
<OTHER-SE>                                                1,596
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              1,342
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             325
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                325
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2081

GEORGE WILLIAM OGOLA ODERO,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: May 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rishi P. Oza, ROBERT BROWN LLC, Cleveland, Ohio, for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, 

Acting Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Steven K. Uejio, 

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

George William Ogola Odero, a native and citizen of Kenya, petitions for review of 

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the 

immigration judge’s decision finding him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(3)(D)(i) 

(2012) (providing that an alien “who falsely represents, or has falsely represented, himself 

to be a citizen of the United States for any purpose or benefit under this chapter . . . or any 

Federal or State law is deportable”).

The Government bears the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence 

that Odero is removable. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(3)(A) (2012). Based on our thorough 

review of the record and Odero’s assignments of error, we agree with the agency that the 

Government met its burden of proof in this case. We therefore deny the petition for review 

for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Odero (B.I.A. Aug. 28, 2017). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
INSTRUCTIONS:EPA is seekinginformation regardingthe costs of estimatingPFC emissions under a possible approach that EPA is exploringTo estimate the costs of this methodology, please include the costs of estimating♦Gas/Facility- specific heel factors.♦PFC-usage byprocess type, usingengineeringmethods(e.gwafer pass or other indicator of tool activity)♦PFC utilization and by-product formation factors by process type. Process types may include the example provided in the "Process Types" tab or a revised version. Assume facility isresponsible for developing the utilization and by-product formation factors.♦PFC DRE byabatement device.Please note whereyou are alreadyperformingthe measurements or estimates in the ordinarycourse of businessPlease provide detail where possible regardinghow engineeringestimates are calculatedTable 1. Annual Costs for Estimating Annual Facility-Level PFC EmissionsFacility-Specific BurdenLabor Burden For Collecting DataInstrumentation Burden For Monitoring DataComments (e.g., is measurement already performed in ordinary courseof business?)Legal (hours)Manager(hours)Technical(hours)Clerical(hours)Capital Costs ($)EquipmentLifetime (years)Annual O&M Costs($)Other AnnualCosts (pleasespecify)Gas-specific heel factors18Once the factors are developed, it is estimated to take 10technical hours per year to apply to purchase records. Notethat 90 technical hours of corporate system programming (todevelop) and 20 technical hours of corporate administration totrack for all facilities is not included.PFC usage by process tool40Note that Freescale is unique in that most cylinders feed only one tool.However, for etch, some distribution among processes must be accounted forthat is currently not done. If there was more bulk distribution of gases, it isestimated to require 120 technical hours per year to conduct engineeringestimates of gas usage which is not business as usual.PFC utilization and by-product formationfactors by specific process type200350,000Assumed 30 individual processes would require characterization (at aminimum) based on the process matrix. $35K per week for consultant toconduct emissions characterization. 3 processes per week. 20 additionaltechnical hours to support & coordinate testing per week.PFC DRE by abatement device* Please clearly note any costs associated with activities that are part of business as usual operations at the fab.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000448

16-MAY-2017

08:05 AM
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-5162 ELISE R. GOLDMAN, (individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Morton J. Goldman), Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 04-CV-123, Judge Lawrence J. Block. ON MOTION 

### ORDER The appellant moves without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April 21, 2009, to file her response to the court's November 6, 2008 order. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT


### APR 1 

## 7 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk 

# ustridatir"

cc: Sallie W. Gladney, Esq. Deborah K. Snyder, Esq. s20 APR 1 

## 7 2009
JEth tiüttbALY CLERK
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John J. Brennan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|               |  | 
|March 15, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ John J. Brennan    
|               |  |  |  | John J. Brennan        
|               |  |  |  | Chairman, President and
|               |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
**BB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0 453 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SCOTT KELLY WALSH ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 14 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including October 2 9 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 14 2022

10/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0453
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 4, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (the “Act”), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ISOMETRICA, Calne, UNITED KINGDOM; GO FAIR Foundation, Leiden, NETHERLANDS; IQD (AURP), College Park, MD; and Patrick Pijanowski (individual member), Greenwood, MO; have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, Zapata Computing Inc., Cambridge, MA; Kalleid, Cambridge, MA; BLS Group, Cormano, ITALY; and Kvantify, Copenhagen, DENMARK have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 7, 2023. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2023 (88 FR 66058).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-02221 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                          69,516
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,434
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     19,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,849
<PP&E>                                       2,446,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                 526,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,729,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,768
<BONDS>                                      1,405,897
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           17,631
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,880
<OTHER-SE>                                     969,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,729,111
<SALES>                                      1,334,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,334,250
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,080,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,083
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                163,863
<INCOME-TAX>                                    63,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            100,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   100,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

          - 26 CFR Part 301

### CFR Correction

This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.

In Title 26 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300 to 499, revised as of April 1, 2023, amend section 301.6721-1 by reinstating paragraph (b)(6) to read as follows:

§ 301.6721-1 

* * * * *

(b) * * *

                            (6)                             *Application to returns not due on February 28, or March 15.*                             For returns that are not due on February 28 or March 15 (for example, Forms 8300 reporting certain cash payments of $10,000 or more), the penalty is $15 if the failure is corrected within 30 days. If the failure is corrected after 30 days, the penalty is $50 rather than $30. There is no period during which the penalty is reduced to $30 under paragraph (b)(2) of this section.                        

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2024-01924 Filed 1-29-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

February 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132991 & (19)(20) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, GRAND RAPIDS EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT Justices 

PERSONNEL ASSOCIATION, MEA/NEA

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 132991 

 COA: 272267 

Kent CC: 05-004837-CZ 

DEAN TRANSPORTATION, INC., and 

DEAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs. The 

motions for immediate consideration and for stay of proceedings are DENIED as moot. 

d0206 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 9, 2007 

 Clerk
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-11747) pertaining to the 1992 Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan, the 1996 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan and the 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan of Aspect Development, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1997,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Aspect Development,
Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended December 31,
1996.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 19, 1997