alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                               |  |                        |  |                                                
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|                       |  |  | 
|Dated: August 16, 2004 |  |  |  |                               |  | /s/    DOUGLAS P. BUTH
|                       |  |  |  |                               |  | Name:                  |  | Douglas P. Buth                                
|                       |  |  |  |                               |  | Title:                 |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



3
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 31, 2011, (the Report), the undersigned, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/S/    DAVID A.
REMIJASDavid A. Remijas Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


March 31, 2011
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD NOLAN NORWOOD, a.k.a.

Polo,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.

RICHARD IVES,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 17

- 35908

D.C. No. 3:17

- cv

- 00733

- CL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 15, 2018 **

Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Edward Norwood appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s deni al of a section

2241 habeas petition

, s ee Bowen v. Hood , 202 F.3d 1211, 1218 (9th Cir. 2000) , and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 22 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 35908

we affirm.

Norwood argues that he is entitled to credit toward his federal sentence for

the time spent in custody between April 17, 2014 , and October 30, 2015 . Under 18

U.S.C. § 3585(b), a defendant cannot receive “ double credit ”

— that is, credit going

towards two separate sentences

— for time spent in presentence custody. See

United States v. Wilson , 503 U.S. 329, 337 (1992). Because the record reflects that

t he state of California credited this time towards Norwood’s prior state sentence,

he is not entitled to credit this period towards his federal sentence. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3585(b).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
        31
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I,
        Atsushi Maki, certify that:
 
 1.  
         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Amanasu
        Environment Corporation;
 
 2.  
         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
        of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
        circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect
        to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
        statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
        present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
        and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
        this
        quarterly report;
 
 4.  
         I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
        procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
        the
        registrant and we have:
 
 a)  
         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
        ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
        particularly during the period in which this report is being
        prepared;
 
 b)  
         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
        of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
        by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  
         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
        fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
        materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
        and
 
 5.  
         I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s
        auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons
        performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)  
         All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
        likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
        summarize and report financial data; and
 
 b)  
         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
        over
        financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
                  November 18, 2007/s/
                  Atsushi MakiAtsushi
                  MakiCEO,
                  CFO, CAO
Exhibit 32.2



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company),
hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                      |  |                                           
|------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                    |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|                    |  |                     
|Dated: May 18, 2005 |  |                      |  | /s/ Dale E. Parker                        
|                    |  | Name:                |  | Dale E. Parker                            
|                    |  | Title:               |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND WRIGHT,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

L. RUMBLES,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-15278

D.C. No. 1:05-cv-01485-BAM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Barbara McAuliffe, Magistrate Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted January 15, 2013*** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Raymond Wright, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment following a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

FILED

JAN 17 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
defendant violated his Eighth Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We affirm the district court’s judgment because Wright has failed to identify

the relevant trial transcripts to enable us to review the alleged errors. On August 9,

2012, this court denied Wright’s request for full transcripts of the trial without

prejudice to renewal, showing which portions of the transcript are necessary to

decide the issues presented. Wright has failed to respond. Accordingly, we are

unable to review his contentions challenging the district court evidentiary rulings. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169

(9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal by pro se appellant for failure to

provide relevant trial transcripts). 

We do not address Wright’s jury bias argument because Wright failed to

raise it in his opening brief. See Liberal v. Estrada, 632 F.3d 1064, 1072 n.6 (9th

Cir. 2011) (arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived).

AFFIRMED.

2 12-15278
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60380 

Conference Calendar

 

RICKEY DALE MESHELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EDDIE LUCAS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:94-CV-168-S-B

- - - - - - - - - -

October 24, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rickey Dale Meshell, Mississippi inmate #49979, appeals the

dismissal, without prejudice, as frivolous of his civil rights

complaint. Meshell argues that the district court abused its

discretion in dismissing the appeal for the following reasons: 

Meshell was entitled to the procedural protections of Wolff v.

McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 564-66 (1974); Meshell’s punishment of
No. 96-60380

- 2 -

close confinement is atypical from the ordinary incidents of

prison life and thus distinguishable from Sandin v. Conner, 115

S. Ct. 2293, 2300 (1995); and the district court erred by

dismissing the suit before service. We have carefully reviewed

the arguments and the appellate record. We conclude that the

district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the

complaint as frivolous. See Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33

(1992).

The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Meshell that any additional

frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Meshell is further cautioned to

review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous.

APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),each of the undersigned officers of Maxim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “**Company**”), hereby certifies that to thebest of his knowledge:

** **

**1.**             The Company’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2003, and to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the “**PeriodicReport**”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) orsection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

** **

**2.****            **Theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

**In Witness Whereof,**each of the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 19th day ofDecember, 2003.

 

 

|   | /s/ Larry G.  Stambaugh                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Larry G.  Stambaugh, Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                                          |
|   | /s/ Anthony  E. Altig                         |
|   | Anthony E.  Altig, Chief Financial Officer    |

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (**“SEC”**) orits staff upon request.

 

This certification“accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Companyunder the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERNALLY
PREPARED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR PERIOD
ENDED JANUARY 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                          42,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,944
<PP&E>                                           1,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,091
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,093
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,604
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,518
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,604
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F N U E F E N D I , a .k .a . E f e n d i E f e n d i, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74772 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 586- 699 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F nu E fe nd i , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f I nd on es i a, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oar d of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a lf r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f orw i thhol di ng of

r e m ova land pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . W e have j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED SEP 28 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74772 2 u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f in d in g s o f

f a c t, in c lu d in g a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n s , Ch e b c h o u b v . I NS , 257 F . 3d 1038, 1 0 4 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) , an dw e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ubs t ant i a le vi de nc e s upport s the I J ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on be c aus e the m ul t ipl e di s c r e panc i e s and om i s s i ons be tw e e n E f e ndi ’ s de c l ar a t i on and hi s t e s t i m onyr e gar di ng the c i r c um s t anc e s of hi s s i ngl e i nc i de ntof

harm , i nc l udi ng w hether he l ostconsci ou snes s, ho w he w entt o the ho spi t al , and w hen h e f l ed I n d o n e s ia , g o to th e h e art o f h is c la im . Se e L i v . A s h c r o ft , 3 7 8 F .3 d9 5 9 , 9 6 2 ( 9 th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ). A cco rd i n g l y, E fen d i ’ s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. B e c aus e E f

e ndi ’ s C A T c l a i m i s ba s e d on the s am e t e s t i m onythe I Jf ound notc r e di bl e , and he of

f e r s no othe re vi de nc e the a ge nc ys houl d have c ons i de r e d, h is C A T c la im a ls o f

a ils . Se e Fa ra h v . A s h c r o ft , 34 8 F . 3d11 53 , 11 56 -57 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). F i na l l y , w e de c l i ne t o a ddr e s s E f e ndi ’ s c ont e nt i ons r e l a t i ng t o the m e r i t s of h is c la im b e c au s e th e a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio nis d is p o s itiv e . Se e id . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                         SECTION 906 CERTFICATION - CEO

In connection with the Annual Report of FirstCity Liquidating Trust (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert W. Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge, after reasonable investigation:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

Date:   March 27, 2003

                                                   /s/ Robert W. Brown
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                   Robert W. Brown
                                                   Principal Executive Officer