1

Filed 7/ 29/16 P. v. S artor CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yuba)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

TISHA NICOLE SARTOR,

Defendant and Appellant. C080247

(Super. Ct. No. CRF1437)

On November 16, 2010, defendant Tisha Nicole Sartor pled no contest to

possessing a forged driver’s license in Sacramento County Superior Court

. Additional

counts for possessing an unfinished check with fraudulent intent, passing a fictitious

check with fraudulent intent, possessing metal knuckles, and possessing stolen property,

were dismissed . Defendant was placed on formal probation for five years, with terms an d

condition s that included her serving 365 days in the county jail. The trial court awarded

her four days of credit for time served. The trial court also ordered defendant to pay

victim restitution, a $200 restitution fine, a stayed $200 probation revoca tion fine, a $402

court security fee, a $30 court facility fee , a monthly $46 probation supervision fee

, and

$25 for each required urinalysis test.

On March 4, 2013, defendant’s request to transfer her probation from Sacramento

County to Yolo County was g ranted. On October 24, 2013, defendant’s request to

transfer her probation from Yolo County to Yuba County was granted.

A petition for revocation of probation was filed on July 23, 2014. The petition

alleged defendant had failed to report to the probation department in person and by mail

and failed to timely report her change of address. Defendant admitted the violation s on

September 29, 2014, and the Yuba County court reinstated probation with modified

terms. Defendant a greed to complete an outpatient treatment program and waived 90

days of presentence credits.

A second petition for revocation of probation was filed on March 13, 2015. This

petition alleged that defendant had failed to obey the law

, possessed personal

i dentification belonging to another

, and failed to submit to drug testing as directed.

Defendant had been convicted in Butte County case No. CM042303 of possessing

personal identifying information of another with fraudulent intent and identity theft.

Defe ndant admitted the alleged violation s on August 3, 2015.

At the August 31, 2015, sentencing hearing, the trial court imposed the upper term

of three years, to be served concurrently with defendant’s sentence in Butte County case

No. CM042303

. The trial court also ordered that the previous ly imposed $200 restitution

fine, stayed $200 probation revocation fine, $40 court security fee, and $30 court facility

fee remain ordered, and awarded defendant 354 days of presentence custody credit.

Defendant appe als.

Counsel for defendant filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case

and asks this court pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3 d 436 to review the

record and det ermine whethe r the r e are any a rguable issues on appeal. Defendant was

advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the filing of3

the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we have received no communication

from defendant.

Having undertaken an examination of the entire record, we find no arguable error

that would result in a disposition more favorable to defendant.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

/s/

Robie, J.

We concur:

/s/

Nicholson, Acting P. J.

/s/

Hoch, J.