alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001013149
<NAME> ICT GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                          12,239                  14,255
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,796                  26,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,191                  42,352
<PP&E>                                          56,205                  47,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,784                  18,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,073                  75,876
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,424                  15,258
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           118                     116
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,222                  45,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,073                  75,876
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,049                 120,982
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   84,390                  69,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                60,080                  47,012
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 801                     406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,778                   3,976
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,033                   1,549
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,745                   2,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,745                   2,427
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40                    0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39                    0.20





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         116,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     28,499
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               281,539
<PP&E>                                       4,228,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                 893,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,329,476
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,619
<BONDS>                                      2,691,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,894
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,185,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,329,476
<SALES>                                      2,050,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,050,898
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,745,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             170,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,116
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,959
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             64,157
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       21,994
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,163
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Frank Litvack, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of Conor Medsystems, Inc. (the
Company), and Michael Boennighausen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, and to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Periodic
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 9th day of August, 2006.



/s/ FRANK LITVACK, M.DFrank Litvack, M.D. Chief Executive
Officer/s/ MICHAEL BOENNIGHAUSENMichael Boennighausen Chief Financial
Officer
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENCESLAO COLDERON-MONZON,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73967

Agency No. A098-653-782

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 13, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Wenceslao Colderon-Monzon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for

withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture

FILED

NOV 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-73967

(“CAT”), and of a BIA’s order denying his motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual

findings, Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir. 2008), and we

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Singh v. Gonzales,

491 F.3d 1090, 1095 (9th Cir. 2007). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Colderon-Monzon

failed to establish that his family membership was or would be one central reason

for the harm he experienced and fears in Guatemala. See Parussimova v. Mukasey,

555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[t]he Real ID Act requires that a protected

ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). In

the absence of a nexus to a protected ground, his withholding of removal claim

fails. See Ochoa v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 1166, 1172 (9th Cir. 2005).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT protection

because Colderon-Monzon failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he

would be tortured by or with the consent or acquiesce of a public official in

Guatemala. See Santos-Lemus, 542 F.3d at 748. Accordingly, his CAT claim also

fails.

In addition, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying ColderonMonzon’s motion to reopen. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.
3 11-73967

2002) (the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is

“arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Graham Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by In Veritas Medical
      Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.








June
      14,
      2007






*/s/
      Graham Cooper*


Graham
      Cooper


President
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas J. Ferree, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Dated: August 15, 2007



|           |  |                                                              
|---------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Thomas J. Ferree                                         
|           |  | Thomas J. Ferree                                             
|           |  | Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-11307, 333-11277, 333-47581, 333-55823 and
333-75611) of RemedyTemp, Inc. of our report dated November 12, 1999, which
appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
our report dated November 12, 1999 relating to the financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
------------------------------
    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Costa Mesa, California
December 27, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Paccapaniccia, Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                                                                        
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  | 
|March 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/    VINCENT A.
PACCAPANICCIA                                        
|               |  |  |  | Vincent A. Paccapaniccia                                               
|               |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0303 BRIAN JOHN TEMPLE,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 10, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 1 2021

02/01/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0303
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7370

In Re: DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-02-1478-PJM) Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 15, 2002 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demetric Gray Pearson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Demetric Gray Pearson petitions for a writ of mandamus. He seeks orders requiring the Government to show cause and recusing the district court. Pearson also raises claims concerning alleged errors in his state court proceedings. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. SeeIn re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Our review of the district court’s docket reveals the Government filed its response and the district court has ruled; therefore, this issue is moot. As to the remainder of Pearson’s arguments, the relief sought by Pearson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 5, 2014

t0129 

# Order

Clerk February 5, 2014

147810

KENNETH A. COSTELLA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147810

COA: 310276

Wayne CC: 11

- 015152

- AS

TAYLOR POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT

SYSTEM,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

CITY OF TAYLOR,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and

we REINSTATE the March 26, 2012 order of the Wayne Circuit Court granting the

defendants’ moti ons for summary disposition, for the reasons stated in the Court of

Appeals dissenting opinion. In particular, the circuit court did not clearly err in

concluding that defendant Taylor Police and Fire Retirement System’s final decision

regarding the plain tiff’s pension benefits was not contrary to law, was not arbitrary,

capricious, or a clear abuse of discretion, and was supported by competent, material and

substantial evidence on the whole record. See VanZandt v State Employees’ Retirement

Sys , 266 Mich App 579, 583

- 585 (2005).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6387

CALVIN LYNDALE GADDY, a/k/a Calvin L. Gaddy,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (8:15-cv-03706-JFA)

Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 23, 2016

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Lyndale Gaddy, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Lyndale Gaddy seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate 

judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Gaddy that 

failure to file timely, specific objections to this 

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court 

order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Gaddy has waived appellate 

review by failing to file specific objections after receiving 

proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 499 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 499

 To provide an exception to the coverage of State and local employees 
                         under Social Security.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 1995

 Mr. Johnston introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide an exception to the coverage of State and local employees 
                         under Social Security.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION TO COVERAGE OF STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES UNDER 
              SOCIAL SECURITY.

    (a) Employment Under OASDI.--Subparagraph (F) of section 210(a)(7) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 410(a)(7)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (iv),
            (2) by inserting ``or'' at the end of clause (v), and
            (3) by inserting after clause (v) the following new clause:
                            ``(vi) by an individual who is 
                        characterized as a part-time, seasonal, or 
                        temporary employee by such retirement 
                        system;''.
    (b) Employment Under FICA.--Subparagraph (F) of section 3121(b)(7) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of clause (iv),
            (2) by inserting ``or'' at the end of clause (v), and
            (3) by inserting after clause (v) the following new clause:
                            ``(vi) by an individual who is 
                        characterized as a part-time, seasonal, or 
                        temporary employee by such retirement 
                        system;''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to service performed after December 31, 1995.
                                 <all>
```