alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0055 

_____________________________

TONY LEON BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Brantley S. Clark, Jr., Judge.

March 11, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Kevin P. Steiger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. (Communicate) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Jeffs, President, Chief Executive Officer of Communicate and the sole member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of Communicate.  /s/ David M. JeffsDavid M. Jeffs Chief Executive Officer November 13, 2003        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. (Communicate) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Cameron Pan, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Communicate, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of Communicate.  /s/ J. Cameron PanJ. Cameron Pan Chief Financial Officer November 13, 2003
#### George Edward BALDERREE, Appellant. v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29796.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 7, 1958.

*643No attorney on appeal, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, 3 days in jail and a fine of $50.

Highway Patrolmen McElroy and Allee testified that on the night in question they observed a pickup truck being driven on and off the shoulder of the highway and gave chase, that the appellant who was the driver staggered when he walked, had a flushed face, bloodshot eyes, spoke incoherently, and smelled of intoxicants. Appellant was carried before Justice of the Peace Holberg, who testified that he staggered, spoke with a thick tongue, and smelled of intoxicants. All three witnesses expressed the opinion that the appellant was intoxicated. Appellant requested that he be given a blood test, and he was carried to the hospital for that purpose; but those in charge refused to give the test.

Appellant, testifying in his own behalf, stated that he had come to San Angelo on the Sunday in question, had spent the afternoon and evening prior to his arrest in drinking beer and dancing, admitted drinking four beers, but denied that he was intoxicated. He called several witnesses as to his reputation.

No formal bills or brief have been submitted.

Appellant objected to the testimony of Judge Holberg as to appellant’s intoxication. The judge testified that he had served ten years as a peace officer before becoming a magistrate and based his opinion upon the facts enumerated above. His testimony was admissible. Mozley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 290 S.W.2d 518.

Finding the evidence sufficient to support the conviction and no reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-91523, 333-91525, and 333-59293) pertaining to the SMC Cash
Accumulation Plan, The SCPIE Holdings Inc. Employees Stock Purchase Plan, and
The 1997 Equity Participation Plan of SCPIE Holdings Inc., respectively, of our
report dated March 1, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2001.

 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 26, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                        Consent of Independent Auditors




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8) listed below of Trusted Information Systems, Inc. of our report
dated March 2, 1998, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Trusted Information Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 26, 1997.


         1)  No. 333-20311        1994 Stock Option Plan
         2)  No. 333-20313        Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan
         3)  No. 333-24849        Amended and Restated 1996 Directors' Stock 
                                  Option Plan
         4)  No. 333-30971        1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan




                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Vienna, Virginia
March 18, 1998
exhibit 3c

FILED# C5191-01
  AUG 02 2002
IN THE OFFICE OF
  DEAN HELLER
DEAN HELLER, SECRETARY OF STATE


          Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                     For Nevada Profit Corporations
      (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)
                          -Remit in Duplicate -

1. Name of corporation:  ATR Search Corporation. (C5191-2001)


2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers,
   if available):

                ARTICLE I is amended to read as follows:

     1.   Name of Company:

                        CareDecision Corporation

                ARTICLE 4 is amended to read as follows:

     4.   Authorized Shares:

The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall have
authority to issue shall consist of 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock
having a $.001 par value, and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock having
a $.001 par value. The Common Stock and Preferred Stock of the Company
may be issued from time to time without prior approval by the
stockholders. The Common Stock and Preferred Stock may be issued for
such consideration as may be fixed from time to time by the Board of
Directors. The Board of Directors may issue such share of Common Stock
and Preferred Stock in one or more series, with such voting powers,
designations, preferences and rights or qualifications, limitations or
restrictions thereof as shall be stated in the resolution or
resolutions.


3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or
such greater portion of the voting power as may be required in the case
of a vote by classes or series, or may be required by the provisions of
the articles of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is:
a majority     .


4. Signatures:


/s/ Michael Vogel                       /s/ Robert Cox
-------------------------               ----------------------
Michael Vogel, Secretary,               Robert Cox, President,
Treasurer & Director                    CEO & Director


/s/ Peter Giacalone
-------------------------
Peter Giacalone, Director



IMPORTANT:     Failure to include any of the above information and remit
the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.






                Nevada Secretary of Slate Form 78.385 PROFIT AMEND199901
                                                    Revised on' 07121/01


/1/
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 27, 2009



/s/ Kelcy L. WarrenKelcy L. WarrenChief Executive Officer


* A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to
and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the“Company”) for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

 

Dated: April 28, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001013335
<NAME> BAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-3-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-3-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,104
<ALLOWANCES>                                       817
<INVENTORY>                                     58,277
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,932
<PP&E>                                          87,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,805
<BONDS>                                        130,741
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                    (48,381)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,678
<SALES>                                        242,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,585
<CGS>                                          241,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,415)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,823)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,823)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (50.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (50.88)
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. (Communicate) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Jeffs, President, Chief Executive Officer of Communicate and the sole member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of Communicate.
 
 /s/ David M. Jeffs David M. Jeffs  Chief Executive Officer  August 13, 2004
  
 Page - 15
  
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. (Communicate) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Cameron Pan, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of Communicate, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of Communicate.
 
 /s/ J. Cameron Pan  J. Cameron Pan  Chief Financial Officer  August 13, 2004
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40784 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE OMAR ACOSTA-ALVAREZ, also known as Antony Omar Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-00-CR-135-1

-------------------- February 15, 2001 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Omar Acosta-Alvarez (Acosta) appeals his conviction and 77-month sentence following his plea of guilty to illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Acosta argues that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserveNo. 00-40784 -2- the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 120 S. Ct. at 2361-62 & n.15. Acosta’s argument is foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. Accordingly, Acosta’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-92014 of Langer, Inc. on Form S-3,
Registration Statement Nos. 333-94769 and 333-110962 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-94769 on Form S-8/A
of our report dated March 17, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Langer, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|                          |  | 
|------------------------- |  | 
|/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP |  | 

Jericho,
New York
March 29, 2005

---



QuickLinks
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

d0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

138708

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138708 COA: 282936 Wayne CC: 05-007345-FC DORAILONTIE MARTEL STRAWTHER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 26, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
PEDIANET.COM, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE THREE MONTHS
THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                    167,332
<SECURITIES>                                2,500
<RECEIVABLES>                              22,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          233,500
<PP&E>                                    408,052
<DEPRECIATION>                           (291,015)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            355,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     703,200
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                 1,000
<COMMON>                                    5,400
<OTHER-SE>                               (354,263)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              355,337
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          254,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,792)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                             (253,052)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0


</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.E.M. and W.T.M.

, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00218

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 01375J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

Appellant appealed from the trial court’s March 5, 2014 judgment. The clerk’s record was filed on March 24, 2014 and the reporter’s record was filed on March 31, 2014; appellant’s brief was therefore due on April 21, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 4.1(a),

38. 6(a). On May 16, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the time for filing her brief had expired.

Appellant responded on May 27, 2014 by filing a “Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief.” In her motion, appellant states that her “coun sel has not filed an appellate brief because the trial court granted a Motion for New Trial on April 28, 2014” and that “counsel intends to file a Motion to Dismiss the appeal when she feels it is safe to do so.” Appellant requests an extension of the dea dline for filing her brief to June 15, 2014.

The granting of a motion for new trial by the trial court does not constitute a reasonable explanation of the need for an extension of time to file an appellate brief. See

T EX

. R. A PP . P. 10.5(b)(1)(C); 38.6(d) . Accordingly, we deny the motion for extension.

Further, b ased on the trial court’s April 28, 2014 “O rder on Motion for New Trial,” which appellant attached to her motion for extension, it appears that this appeal is

now moot. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 21.9(b); Galvan v. Harris Cnty. , No. 01

- 09

- 00884

- CV, 2011 WL 345677, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 31, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) ; see also T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.220(c) (West Supp. 2013 ); T EX

. R. A PP . P.

10.2

. Accordingly, we notify ap pellant that we may dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless appellant files a written response within 10 days of this order, providing a detailed explanation, citing relevant portions of the record, statutes, rules, and case law, showing that this appeal is n ot moot and that this Court has jurisdiction over this proceeding. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 21.9(b) , 42.3

.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 3, 2014
II

Calendar No. 31

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 532

To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 10 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

MARCH 16, 1995

Reported by Mr. HATCH, without amendment

A BILL

To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VENUE.

4 Paragraph (3) of section 1391(a) of title 28, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the defendants are’’

6 and inserting ‘‘any defendant is’’.
Calendar No. 31

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 532

A BILL

To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other

purposes.

MARCH 16, 1995

Reported without amendment
Federal Register / Vol. 49, No. 235 / Wednesday, December 5, 1984 / Rules and Regulations 47479

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy 10 CFR Part 430 [Docket No. CE-RM- 82-130] Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products; Test Procedures for Dishwashers Correction In FR Doc. 84

-30976 beginning on page 46533 in the issue of Tuesday , November 27, 1984, make the following correction: Appendix C-[Corrected] On page 46536, in the second column, in the next to last line of the column, "than the test" should read "then the test". BIWNO CODE 1505-01-M 

### Federal Register 

## I Vol. 49, No. 235 

## I Wednesday, December 5, 1984 

## I Rules and Regulations 47479



## ........ ==-= Jm:Z'W1: """,*"",:..,n**~J_"~_ ''''''1II<Ir~**  DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Office of Conservation and Renewable Energy 

### 10 CFR 

### Part 430 [Docket No. CE-RM-82-130] Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Productsj Test Procedures < for Dishwashers 

### Correction

In FR Doc. 64-30976 beginning on page 46533 in the issue ofTuesday, November 27,1984, 

### make the following correction: Appendix C-(Corrected)

On page 46536, in the second column, in 

### the next to last line ofthe column, "than the test" should read "then the test". BlLUHG CODE 1505-01-11