alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136664 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 136664 

 COA: 283835 

Wayne CC: 07-007973-FH

LUKISHA SABRINA PATTON,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 22, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


Below each General Partner's name is a list of the limited  partnerships,  other
than the  Registrant,  for which the General Partner serves as a general partner
and the companies for which the General  Partner serves as a director.  The list
includes only those  limited  partnerships  and companies  which have a class of
securities  registered  pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 or are subject to the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Act.




John J. Nooney

  Limited Partnerships:


   Nooney Real Property Investors-Two, L.P.     Nooney Income Fund Ltd. II, L.P.

Companies:

  None



                                       18
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned
Principal Financial Officer of McKenzie Bay International, Ltd.  (the
"Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly
Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company  for  the  quarter ended  December 31,
2004  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2005

/s/ Gregory N. Bakeman
----------------------
Gregory N. Bakeman
Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 655 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                 S. 655

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel MARANTHA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with the 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel MARANTHA (United States official number 638787).

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 655

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel MARANTHA.
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

s1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141383

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141383 COA: 290553 Kalamazoo CC: 2008-001528-FH JEFFREY ROBERT CHAPMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit








	
	
	EXHIBIT 10.10






THIRD AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT 


THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of April 27, 2016, by and between the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLBDM”), a federally chartered corporation and successor to Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle (“FHLBS”), and Glen Simecek (“Executive”).
R E C I T A L S
WHEREAS, FHLBS and the Executive entered into that certain Change in Control Agreement dated March 17, 2014, as amended on May 14, 2015 and September 30, 2015 (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Agreement may be amended by a writing signed by FHLBDM and the Executive; and
WHEREAS, FHLBDM and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


A G R E E M E N T


Section 1.6 of the Agreement is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety with the following:
1.6.    “Good Reason Termination” shall mean Executive’s voluntary termination of his employment with FHLBDM for one of more of the following reasons:
		
	(a)
	the assignment of ongoing duties to Executive that are materially inconsistent with Executive’s position; or


(b)    any material diminution in the Executive’s authority or responsibilities; or
		
	(c)
	a material reduction in the Executive’s base salary, bonus opportunity under applicable incentive compensation plans, or retirement plan benefits, unless such reduction is made as part of a nondiscriminatory cost reduction plan applicable to the Company’s total compensation budget; or


		
	(d)
	a material change by FHLBDM in the geographic location at which the Executive is required to perform his services; or


		
	(e)
	a material diminution in the budget over which the Executive retains authority; or











(f)    a material breach of this agreement by the FHLBDM.


If  (i) Executive provides written notice to FHLBDM of the existence of circumstances that would justify a Good Reason Termination within (A) seven hundred thirty (730) days after Executive has knowledge of the circumstances pertaining to any of items (a), (b), or (d), or (B) ninety (90) days after Executive has knowledge of the circumstances pertaining to any of items (c), (e), or (f), which notice shall specifically identify the circumstances that Executive believes justify a Good Reason Termination; (ii) FHLBDM fails to correct the circumstances within thirty (30) days after receiving such notice; and (iii) Executive resigns within fifteen (15) days after the FHLBDM fails to correct such circumstances; then Executive’s termination shall be considered to have been a Good Reason Termination for purposes of this Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF DES MOINES


By:                        
Michael L. Wilson
President and CEO


EXECUTIVE
                        
Glen Simecek
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Llewellen Fernando SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-6893.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 2002.

Decided Aug. 2, 2002.

Llewellen Fernando Smith, Appellant Pro Se. David John Novak, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Llewellen Fernando Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Smith’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. Smith,*No. CR-96-66 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 7, 2000 & entered Aug. 8, 2000; May 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6049
SIDNEY LEE CUTCHIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-380-R) Submitted: September 10, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sidney Lee Cutchin, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), as amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cutchin v. Angelone , No. CA-95-380-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A147
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-K Annual Report of Mandalay Resort Group (the "Company") for the annual period ended January 31, 2005 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 15, 2005 |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/GLENN SCHAEFFERGlenn Schaeffer, President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Mandalay Resort Group

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify
that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     1)   the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
          30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   the information contained in the Company's quarterly report on Form
          10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                          /s/ Paul Walker
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Paul Walker
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 14, 2002
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

No. 08

- 18

- 00024

- CV

§

IN RE: J.M.G.,

Relator. §

§

§ AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDI NG

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Mike Herrera, Judge of the 383rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, and

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditio nally granted. We

therefore direct the trial court to vacate the order denying Relator’s plea to the jurisdiction and to

dismiss the Real Party in Interest ’s suit for possession or access

, in accordance with the opinion of

this Court. The writ of mandamu s will issue only if the trial court fails to act in accordance with

our opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClu re, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 457 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 130
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 457

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to update references in 
     the classification of children for purposes of United States 
                           immigration laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 22, 1995

  Mr. Simon (for himself, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. D'Amato, Mr. 
  Packwood, Mr. Hatfield, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Bradley, Mr. 
   Kohl, Mr. Biden, Mr. Levin, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Kerry) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                June 22 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to update references in 
     the classification of children for purposes of United States 
                           immigration laws.
    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF CHILD.

    Section 101(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``legitimate 
                child'' and inserting ``child born in wedlock''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``an 
                illegitimate child'' and inserting ``a child born out 
                of wedlock''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``an illegitimate child'' 
        and inserting ``a child born out of wedlock''.
                                     
                                                       Calendar No. 130

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 457

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to update references in 
     the classification of children for purposes of United States 
                           immigration laws.

_______________________________________________________________________

                June 22 (legislative day, June 19), 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-5162

ELISE R. GOLDMAN,

(individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Morton J. Goldman),

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 04-CV-123, Judge Lawrence

J. Block.

ON MOTION

ORDER

The appellant moves without opposition for a 6-day extension of time, until April

21, 2009, to file her response to the court's November 6, 2008 order.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

APR 1 7 2009

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk ustridatir"

cc:	Sallie W. Gladney, Esq.

Deborah K. Snyder, Esq.

s20

APR 1 7 2009

JEth tiüttbALY

CLERK
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 468 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 468

 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
    construction of a hydroelectric project in Ohio, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 23 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

 Mr. Glenn (for himself and Mr. DeWine) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the 
    construction of a hydroelectric project in Ohio, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 9423, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and 
public interest requirements of that section and the Commission's 
procedures under that section, extend the time period during which the 
licensee is required to commence the construction of the project, under 
the extension described in subsection (b), for not more than 3 
consecutive 2-year periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on the date of 
the expiration of the extension of the period required for commencement 
of construction of the project described in subsection (a) that the 
Commission issued, prior to the date of enactment of this Act, under 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).
                                 <all>
```