alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Live Current Media Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C. Geoffrey Hampson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ C. Geoffrey Hampson


C. Geoffrey Hampson


Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


September 21, 2009
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











The Board
of Directors of Norwood Financial Corp.





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-61487 and 333-134831 on Form S-8 of Norwood Financial Corp. of our
report dated March 9, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Norwood Financial Corp. for the year ended
December 31, 2009.












Wexford,
Pennsylvania


March 15,
2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. Wilkniss,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


August 1, 2006                                       By:  /s/ PETER F. WILKNISS
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Peter F. Wilkniss
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        Chief Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Alan B. Catherall, Chief Financial Officer of iPCS, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
    ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
    or 78o(d)); and

(2) to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
    results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  August 14, 2002



                                            /s/ Alan B. Catherall
                                            -------------------------
                                            Alan B. Catherall
                                            Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 10, 2006



/s/    DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. PasseriPresident and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). E G / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR I O R E NE R UB I O, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. C . M . H A R R I S O N , W ar de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 55110 D. C. No . CV- 0 4 - 0 3 7 1 0 - M LR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M anue l L . R e a l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J anua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner M ar i o R ene Rub i o app ea l s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u an tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED

JAN 26 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSE G / Res ea r ch 07- 55110 2 R ubi o c ont e nds tha thi s pr i s on di s c i pl i narypr oc e e di ngs vi ol a t e d hi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s be c aus e the r e w a s i ns uf f i c i e nte vi de nc e t o s upportthe he ar i ng o f f ic e r ’s f in d in g th a t R ub io e n g a g e din m u tu a l c o m b a t. T h is c o n te n tio n f a ils b e c au s e “s o m e e v id e n c e ” in th e r e c o r ds up p o rts th e f in d in g . See Su

peri ntendentv. Hill, 4 7 2 U .S . 4 4 5 , 4 5 5 ( 1 9 8 5 ) . AF F I RME D.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 4, 2012

y0328 

# Order

April 4, 2012

143892

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143892 COA: 305035 BRYAN MATTHEW NOONAN, Be rrien CC: 2009-001073 FC Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 23, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 9105]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02624]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[WC Docket No. 17-84; Report No. 3209; FR ID 201345]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for Reconsideration; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications Commission published a document in 
the Federal Register on January 29, 2024, announcing the dates for 
filing oppositions and replies to a Petition for Reconsideration of 
Action in a Rulemaking Proceeding in WC Docket No. 17-84, adopted by 
the Commission on December 13, 2023. There is an error in the Dates 
section of this document, incorrectly setting the deadline for replies 
to oppositions as February 8, 2024 rather than February 23, 2024.

DATES: February 9, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please 
contact Michael Ray, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition 
Bureau, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d20040e050c0801433f0c142d0b0e0e430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c41656f646d6960225e6d754c6a6f6f226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-418-0357.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of January 29, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-01633, 
on page 5439, in the third column, fourth paragraph from the bottom, 
correct the ``Dates'' caption to read:

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions must be filed on or before February 
13, 2024. Replies to oppositions must be filed on or before February 
23, 2024.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-02624 Filed 2-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-41346

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL TREVINO,

 DefendantAppellant.

______________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-99-CR-536-1

______________________________________

July 25, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Samuel Trevino appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. He argues that

the checkpoint operated by the Border Patrol was constitutionally inadequate. The checkpoint at

issue here issubstantiallysimilarto one that passed constitutionalmusterinUnited States v. VenegasSapien, 762 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1985). Trevino has not shown, and we cannot discern, any material

differences between the two checkpoints. Consequently, Trevino has failed to demonstrate error on

the part of the district court, and that court’s denial of Trevino’s motion to suppress is AFFIRMED.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VALCOM, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
             (In thousands, except per share amounts)
</LEGEND>

<S>  <C>                                         <C>
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
     <PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
     <PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
     <CASH>                                             7,787
     <SECURITIES>                                           0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                     74,455
     <ALLOWANCES>                                           0
     <INVENTORY>                                            0
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,086,443
     <DEPRECIATION>                                   271,714
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                16,008,528
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,084,850
     <PP&E>                                        11,681,381
     <BONDS>                                                0
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
     <PREFERRED>                                        1,543
     <COMMON>                                          90,140
     <OTHER-SE>                                     8,101,157
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  16,008,528
     <SALES>                                                0
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,395,073
     <CGS>                                                  0
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,435,717
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               851,078
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,891,722)
     <INCOME-TAX>                                           0
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,891,722)
     <DISCONTINUED>                                         0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
     <CHANGES>                                              0
     <NET-INCOME>                                  (1,891,722)
     <EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0)



</TABLE>
#### ZANONE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY, Inc. (Incorporated in Kentucky), Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Jan. 16, 1959.

Rehearing Denied May 1, 1959.

Fisher & McConnell, Charles C. McConnell, Louisville, for appellant.

Middleton, Seelbach, Wolford, Willis & Cochran, Louis Seelbach, Charles G. Middleton, Jr., Gerald Kirven, Louisville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for an appeal from a judgment awarding Standard Oil Company the sum of $868.34 against Zanone Company, Inc. The latter sued Standard to recover the sum of $1468.66 and Standard counterclaimed for the sum of $2335. Zanone denied liability as to the amount of the counterclaim on the ground that it had accrued against a partnership which had ceased to exist and that the corporation had not agreed to pay any obligations of the partnership. The lower court found against this contention and adjudged Standard entitled to the difference between these two sums.

The record established that the corporation was a family device organized to take over the assets of the partnership and carry on the same business without any cessation of activity; and that._piany of the assets transferred over from the partnership were_acqmredjwithout _any. consideration. According to Twyman Zanone, one of two persons who composed the partnership and who thereafter became the president of the newly-created corporation, the purpose of bringing the cor*711poration into existence was “to search about for some means to be able to do business and not be entangled with the past.”

The lower court found the corporation was merely a continuance of the partnership under a new form, and that the consideration for the sale of the assets of the partnership to the corporation was inadequate and also that the transfer of all the assets of the partnership under the circumstances was consummated for the purpose of defeating the creditors of the latter. It therefore held the corporation liable on Standard’s counterclaim.

We concur in this holding of the lower court. See 13 Am.Jur., Corporations, § 1248, p. 1133.

Wherefore, the motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.
# Amtsblatt C 181/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2407
  doi:10.3000/17252407.C_2010.181.ger |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 181 |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 53. Jahrgang6. Juli 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2407

doi:10.3000/17252407.C_2010.181.ger

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 181

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

53. Jahrgang6. Juli 2010

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2010/C 181/01 | Erratum der Konsolidierten Fassung des Vertrags zur Gründung der Europäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABl. C 84 vom 30.3.2010) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

2010/C 181/01

Erratum der Konsolidierten Fassung des Vertrags zur Gründung der Europäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABl. C 84 vom 30.3.2010)

1

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

6.7.2010

| 6.7.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 181/1

---

ERRATUM

der Konsolidierten Fassung des Vertrags zur Gründung der Europäischen Atomgemeinschaft

(

  „Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union“ ABl. C 84 vom 30. März 2010

  )

(2010/C 181/01)

Seite 4, im Inhaltsverzeichnis, Titel VI:

Statt:

| „TITEL VI | Schlussbestimmungen |
| --- | --- |

„TITEL VI

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

| „TITEL VI | Vorschriften über die Anlaufzeit (Aufgehoben) |
| --- | --- |

„TITEL VI

SCHLUSSBESTIMMUNGEN

Seite 14, Artikel 17, Absatz 1, unter Buchstabe b) Ziffer iv):

Der letzte Unterabsatz („Die Mitgliedstaaten können zur Befriedigung der genannten Bedürfnisse ohne vorherigen Antrag der Kommission (...)“) ist nach links zu verschieben, damit er auf derselben Linie abschließt wie der erste Unterabsatz, um zu verdeutlichen, dass es sich um einen eigenen Unterabsatz handelt und nicht um einen Teil von Buchstabe b) Ziffer iv).

Der letzte Unterabsatz („Die Mitgliedstaaten können zur Befriedigung der genannten Bedürfnisse ohne vorherigen Antrag der Kommission (...)“) ist nach links zu verschieben, damit er auf derselben Linie abschließt wie der erste Unterabsatz, um zu verdeutlichen, dass es sich um einen eigenen Unterabsatz handelt und nicht um einen Teil von Buchstabe b) Ziffer iv).

Seite 56, Titel VI

Statt:

Statt:

„TITEL VI

Artikel 209 bis 223

(Aufgehoben)

SCHLUSSBESTIMMUNGEN“

muss es heißen:

muss es heißen:

„TITEL VI

VORSCHRIFTEN ÜBER DIE ANLAUFZEIT

(Aufgehoben)

Artikel 209 bis 223

(Aufgehoben)

SCHLUSSBESTIMMUNGEN“

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 531 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 531

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in an in banc hearing 
 of a case to continue to participate in that case after taking senior 
                    status, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    The last sentence of section 46(c) of title 28, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting ``(1)'' after ``eligible'' and by inserting 
before the period at the end of the sentence ``, or (2) to continue to 
participate in the decision of a case or controversy that was heard or 
reheard by the court in banc at a time when such judge was in regular 
active service''.

            Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day, September 
      25), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 531

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in an in banc hearing 
 of a case to continue to participate in that case after taking senior 
                    status, and for other purposes.
```
|    |                                                                                                |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Endologix, Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |  |
| April 30, 2019 | By: | /s/ VASEEM MAHBOOB |
|           |   | Vaseem Mahboob |
|           |   | Chief Financial Officer |
II

Calendar No. 90

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 561

[Report No. 104–68]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel ISABELLE, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1995

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

APRIL 18, 1995

Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of April 6 (legislative

day, April 5), 1995, by Mr. PRESSLER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

ISABELLE, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 561 RS

1 SECTION 1. VESSEL DOCUMENTATION.

2 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

3 Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of

4 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 App. U.S.C.

5 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code,

6 the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of

7 documentation with appropriate endorsement for employ8 ment in the coastwise trade for the vessel ISABELLE,

9 United States official number 600655.

Calendar No. 90

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 561

[Report No. 104–68]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

other purposes.wise trade for the vessel ISABELLE, and forpriate endorsement for employment in the coastissue a certificate of documentation with approAPRIL 18, 1995

Reported without amendment