alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMANDO ALVAREZ-CORONA, et al. 

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

Nos. 08-72268

 09-70495

Agency Nos. A075-731-667

 A075-731-668

 A075-731-669

 A075-731-670

MEMORANDUM*

On Petitions for Review of Orders of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated petitions, Armando Alvarez-Corona and his family,

natives and citizens of Mexico, seek review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) orders denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings and denying

FILED

OCT 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-72268

their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for abuse of discretion the denial of motions to reopen and reconsider, and

review de novo claims of due process violations, including ineffective assistance of

counsel claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). 

We deny the petitions for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen where they failed to establish that ineffective assistance of counsel may

have affected the outcome of their case. See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d

814, 826 (9th Cir. 2003) (to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim a

petitioner must demonstrate prejudice). 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the

BIA’s prior decision denying their motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1);

Socop-Gonzalez v. INS, 272 F.3d 1176, 1180 n.2 (9th Cir. 2001) (en banc).

PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED.
d'

",,' ......., .

""""

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

and

BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL

TRADING AGREEMENT AND

ORDER NO. 8132 MODIFICATION

TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION

In the matter of a Trading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner of Environmental

Protection ("Commissioner") and Bridgeport Hospital ("BH").

WHEREAS, the Commissioner and BH, having agreed to the tenns and conditions set

forth in Trading Agreement and Order No. 8132 issued on September 10, 1996, do now, by mutual

agreement, modify paragraphs AJ., 8., C.I., C.2., C.2.D., C.2.G., C.4. and C. II. as follows:

I. Change the date specified in paragraph A.3. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003.

2. Change the date specified in paragraph B. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003.

3. Change the third date specified in paragraph C.1. from May I, 1999 to

May 1,2003.

4. Change the second date specified in paragraph C.2. from May I, 1999 to

May 1,2003.

5. Change the date specified in paragraph C.2.D. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003.

6. Replace paragraph C.2.0. as follows: No later than March 1 of the years 1999,

2000,2001,2002,2003 and 2004, include with its annual emissions report to the

Commissioner, NOx emissions and ERCs used for the previous calendar year, in

monthly increments;

7. Change the date specified in paragraph C.4. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003.

8. Change the date specified in paragraph C.ll. from May I, 1999 to May I, 2003.

lnitiais: Date: 4.12·Cfj

(Printed on Recycled Paper)

79 Elm Slfeel • Harlford, CT 06106 - 5127

tmp:lfdc p. Slit C.CI.us

An Equol Opportunity Employer
,

BRlDGEPORT HOSPITAL 2 TRADING AGREEMENT

AND ORDER NO. 8132

MODIFICATION

All other terms and conditions ofTracting Agreement and Order No. 8132 issued by the

Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6, 22a-171, 22a-174, 22a-176, 22a-177 and 22a-178 of

the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect.

Bridgeport Hospital hereby consents to the entry of this modification to the Trading Agreement

and Order without further notice.

. Br~ Signature: --"~""'-="'l"'-4d-:-_------

Type Name:

Type Title:

Date:

Entered as a modification of an Order of the Commissioner of Environmental Protection numbered

8132 this 29 day of !lpJ 1999.

rthur 1. Rocque, Jr.

Commissioner

CITY OF BRlDGEPORT

LAND RECORDS

MAILED CERTIFIED MAlL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

Certified Document No.
Exhibit



















March 7, 2017


Erin Energy Corporation 
f/k/a CAMAC Energy Inc.
1330 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2250
Houston, Texas 77056


Attention: Chief Financial Officer


Re: Extension of Maturity Date for Convertible Note Due dated March 11, 2015 and due December
31, 2017 (the "Note")


Dear Sir:


Per your request and pursuant to Section 10 of the Note, this letter serves as an amendment to the Note, whereby the Maturity Date, as defined in the Note shall be extended to April 30, 2018. Accordingly, the definition of "Maturity Date" shall be revised to read as follows:


"Maturity Date" means April 30, 2018


All other terms and conditions of the Note shall remain as provided in the Note. Further terms not otherwise defined in this letter shall have the meaning as defined in the Note.


Please indicate your acceptance of the terms of this letter by signing below.




Sincerely,    
 


ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO BY:





Plot 1649, Olosa Street I  Victoria   Island,  Lagos,  Nigeria I  Tel:  +2341  4603357-9 I  Fax:  +234 1   2704271
Dr. Kase Lukman Lawal, Chairman
Kamoru A.  Lawal, Mickey Lawal, lyabo Adegbemile,  Kio Clement Bestmann, Adekule Alli, Olayide  Olufemi,  Directors
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of RemedyTemp, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify withrespect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended September 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “10-K Report”) that: 

 

 

December 19, 2003                                                                        /s/ GREG D. PALMER

                                                                                                Greg D. Palmer 

                                                                                                President and Chief Executive Officer 

                                                                                                RemedyTemp, Inc. 

 

December 19, 2003                                                                        /s/ MONTY A. HOUDESHELL

                                                                                                Monty A. Houdeshell 

                                                                                                Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

                                                                                                RemedyTemp, Inc. 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature thatappears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vasu D. ARORA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-7856.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 25, 2002.

Decided Aug. 9, 2002.

Vasu D. Arora, Appellant Pro Se. Rick A. Mountcastle, Steven Randall Ramseyer, Office of The United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Vasu D. Arora appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for the district court judge to recuse himself and authorizing the Government to dispose of Arora’s files. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Arora’s motion to file a corrected brief, deny his motion for summary judgment, and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Arora,*Nos. CR-98-72-1; CA-01-305-7 (W.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2001). We deny Arora’s motion for reimbursement of the filing fee. Arora *599also filed two motions for relief, alleging violations of his Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights. We deny these motions without prejudice to his right to file for such relief in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 2001) action pending in the district court. We also deny Arora’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 24-0455

IN THE MATTER OF UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE COMPLAINT 

2023DRS00256.

MITCHELL MCBROOM and BARBARA LEWIS-BACA, 

PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS,

v.

MONTANA BOARD OF PERSONNEL APPEALS and MISSOULA URBAN 

TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, RESPONDENTS/APPELLEES.

On Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County

Hon. District Court Judge Jason Marks

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellants’ unopposed motion for extension of time

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellants are granted an extension of time 

through October 7, 2024, inclusive, to file their opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed and dated below.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

September 3 2024

09/03/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0455
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.01

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-04287) of our report dated January 29, 1997, on our
audits of the financial statements and financial statement Schedule of
CardioGenesis Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

                                                COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

San Jose, California
March 26, 1997

                                     - 40 -
Order entered December 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01224-CV

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant

V.

CATHERINE STOUFFER, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF 

GARY LEE STOUFFER, JR. AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF SHANNON STOUFFER AND 

SHANE STOUFFER, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-15204

ORDER

Appellees’ Motion to Dismiss the appeal is DENIED.

/s/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 15, 2007 |  | /s/ Donald J. Zuk      
|                      |  | Donald J. Zuk          
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date:  May 8, 2009 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT L. HOWARD-ANDERSON         |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                         | Name:  | Robert L. Howard-Anderson             |
|                         | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Jeanne Seeley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date:  May 8,  2009 | By:    | /s/ JEANNE SEELEY       |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          | Name:  | Jeanne Seeley           |
|                          | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will beretained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 283 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 283

 To extend the deadlines under the Federal Power Act applicable to two 
    hydroelectric projects in Pennsylvania, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

  Mr. Specter (for himself and Mr. Santorum) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the deadlines under the Federal Power Act applicable to two 
    hydroelectric projects in Pennsylvania, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PROJECT NUMBER 4474

    Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in 
this Act as the `Commission'), upon the request of the licensees for 
Commission Project No. 4474, is authorized, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of section 13 of 
the Federal Power Act and the Commission's procedures under such 
section, to extend until April 15, 2001, the time required for the 
licensees to commence construction of such project.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PROJECT NUMBER 7041.

    Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of the Federal 
Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (referred to in 
this Act as the `Commission'), upon the request of the licensees for 
Commission Project No. 7401, is authorized, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of section 13 of 
the Federal Power Act and the Commission's procedures under such 
section, to extend until April 15, 2001, the time required for the 
licensees to commence construction of such project.
                                 <all>
```
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DONOVAN BURGHER and SHARON BURGHER,

Appellants,

v.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1361

[April 9, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Howard H. Harrison, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2013-

CA-007033.

Donovan Burgher and Sharon Burgher, Lake Worth, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee, and William P. Heller 

of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.1

GROSS, MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

1 We are mindful of the issuance of Administrative Order SC20-23 (the 

requirement in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.580(a) for the clerk to issue a 

writ of possession “forthwith” remains suspended) and Executive Order 20-94 

(suspending and tolling any statute providing for a mortgage foreclosure cause of 

action under Florida law for 45 days from April 2, 2020). We trust any motions 

directed to those orders shall be filed in the lower tribunal upon issuance of our 

mandate.
# Den Europæiske Unions C 181/2010

| | ISSN 1725-2393
  doi:10.3000/17252393.C_2010.181.dan |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | C 181 |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Meddelelser og oplysninger | 53. årgang6. juli 2010 |

ISSN 1725-2393

doi:10.3000/17252393.C_2010.181.dan

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

C 181

Dansk udgave

Meddelelser og oplysninger

53. årgang6. juli 2010

---

| Informationsnummer | Indhold | Side |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2010/C 181/01 | Erratum til den konsoliderede udgave af traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Atomenergifællesskab (EUT C 84 af 30.3.2010) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Indhold

Side

2010/C 181/01

Erratum til den konsoliderede udgave af traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Atomenergifællesskab (EUT C 84 af 30.3.2010)

1

| DA | |
| --- | --- |

DA

---

6.7.2010

| 6.7.2010 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

C 181/1

---

ERRATUM

til den konsoliderede udgave af traktaten om oprettelse af Det Europæiske Atomenergifællesskab

(

  »De Europæiske Fællesskabers Tidende« C 84 af 30. marts 2010

  )

(2010/C 181/01)

Side 4, indholdsfortegnelsen, afsnit VI:

I stedet for:

| »AFSNIT VI | Afsluttende bestemmelser |
| --- | --- |

»AFSNIT VI

læses:

læses:

| »AFSNIT VI | Bestemmelser vedrørende begyndelsesperioden (Ophævet) |
| --- | --- |

»AFSNIT VI

AFSLUTTENDE BESTEMMELSER

Side 14, artikel 17, stk. 1, under litra b), nr. iv):

Sidste afsnit (»For at dække de nævnte behov kan medlemsstaterne ikke uden forudgående begæring fra Kommissionen ...«) rykkes mod venstre, på samme niveau som første afsnit, for at markere, at det drejer sig om et selvstændigt afsnit, der ikke er en del af litra b), nr. iv).

Sidste afsnit (»For at dække de nævnte behov kan medlemsstaterne ikke uden forudgående begæring fra Kommissionen ...«) rykkes mod venstre, på samme niveau som første afsnit, for at markere, at det drejer sig om et selvstændigt afsnit, der ikke er en del af litra b), nr. iv).

Side 56, afsnit VI:

I stedet for:

I stedet for:

»AFSNIT VI

Artikel 209-223

(Ophævet)

AFSLUTTENDE BESTEMMELSER«

læses:

læses:

»AFSNIT VI

BESTEMMELSER VEDRØRENDE BEGYNDELSESPERIODEN

(Ophævet)

Artikel 209-223

(Ophævet)

AFSLUTTENDE BESTEMMELSER«.

---
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 509

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into an appropriate

form of agreement with, the town of Grand Lake, Colorado, authorizing

the town to maintain permanently a cemetery in the Rocky Mountain

National Park.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into

an appropriate form of agreement with, the town of

Grand Lake, Colorado, authorizing the town to maintain

permanently a cemetery in the Rocky Mountain National

Park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OF CEMETERY IN ROCKY MOUN4 TAIN NATIONAL PARK.

5 (a) AGREEMENT.—Notwithstanding any other law,

6 not later than 6 months after the date of enactment of

7 this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall enter into an
2

•S 509 IS

1 appropriate form of agreement with the town of Grand

2 Lake, Colorado, authorizing the town to maintain perma3 nently, under appropriate terms and conditions, a ceme4 tery within the boundaries of the Rocky Mountain Na5 tional Park.

6 (b) CEMETERY BOUNDARIES.—The cemetery shall be

7 comprised of approximately 5 acres of land, as generally

8 depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Grand Lake Cemetery’’ and

9 dated February 1995.

10 (c) AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION.—The

11 Secretary of the Interior shall place the map described in

12 subsection (b) on file, and make the map available for pub13 lic inspection, in the headquarters office of the Rocky

14 Mountain National Park.

15 (d) LIMITATION.—The cemetery shall not be ex16 tended beyond the boundaries of the cemetery shown on

17 the map described in subsection (b).

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ICG Communications, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard E. Fish, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  March 26, 2003      /S/ RICHARD E. FISH, JR.
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Richard E. Fish, Jr.
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                           (Principal Financial Officer)