alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-1841V

UNPUBLISHED

ROBERT BACHANT,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: November 23, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Mark Kim Hellie, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On December 4, 2019, Robert Bachant filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a table injury of Guillain-Barre 

Syndrome (GBS) as a result of his December 22, 2016 influneza (“flu”) vaccination. 

Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of 

Special Masters.

On November 20, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent indicates that

Medical personnel at the Division of Injury Compensation Programs, 

Department of Health and Human Services (“DICP”), have reviewed the 

petition and medical records filed in the case. It is respondent’s position that 

petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table 

(“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”). 42 C.F.R. 

§§ 100.3(a)(XIV)(D), 100.3(c)(15).

Id. at 4. Respondent further indicates that “[t]he scope of damages to be awarded is 

limited to petitioner’s GBS and its related sequelae only.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Long Beach Mortgage
                                       Company


                      OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
                 ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
                                
               MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS SERIES
               1996-1, 1996-2, 1996-3, AND 1996-4
                                
IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE SECTION OF THE ABOVE CAPTIONED
POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENTS, I, PATRICIA L. WAYMAN, AND
SHAWNA R. OGILVIE OF LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY, (THE
"SERVICER") HEREBY CERTIFIY:

(i)  A REVIEW OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE SERVICER DURING THE
     PRECEDING CALENDAR YEAR, AND OF PERFORMANCE UNDER THESE
     AGREEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE UNDER OUR SUPERVISION.

(ii) TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, BASED ON SUCH REVIEW, THE
     SERVICER HAS FULFILLED ALL ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THESE AGREEMENTS
     THROUGHOUT SUCH YEAR.

CERTIFIED THIS 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 1997.



BY: \s\ PATRICIA L. WAYMAN    
       PATRICIA L. WAYMAN     
       PRESIDENT              
                              
BY: \s\ SHAWNA R. OGILVIE     
       SHAWNA R. OGILVIE      
       VICE PRESIDENT
EMBRY-RIDDLE 

Aeronautical University 

DAYTONA BEACH, FLORIDA 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 

Docket Operations, 

West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12-140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590 

Request for Exemption: 

14 CFR Part 141 Appendix I 4 U)(2)(i-iv) 

Dear Sir /Madam, 

Flight Department 

Tel: 386-226-6837 

Fax: 386-226-6274 

April 30, 2013 

Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (ERAU) requests an exemption from the Commercial Pilot 

Additional Class Rating aeronautical experience requirements of 14 CFR Part 141 Appendix I 4 

m (2) (ii) which requires an applicant to have; 10 hours of flight training in an airplane that has 

retractable gear, flaps, and a controllable pitch propeller, or is turbine powered. 

ERAU bases .this request on the fact that if students complete a Commercial Pilot Additional Class 

Rating under Part61.63 (c)(3) there is no such requirement for the aforementioned aeronautical 

experience. The·Prq.ctical Test Standards for Commercial Pilot do not require testing in a complex 

aircraft for·an Additional Class ~ating; if the applicant currently holds a Commercial Pilot certificate 

with a single-engine or multiengine class rating. Additionally, all students enrolling in this course 

will have completed training for an initial Commercial Pilot Certificate in the Diamond DA-42. Each 

student will have at least 27 hours of multi-engine complex flight time. 

Granting this exemption request would have a positive economic impact on ERAU and its students. 

The student would realize the cost savings through a reduction in hourly rate differences charged 

for training time in a non-complex versus a complex aircraft, along with a reduction in the total 

number of training hours required. 

" ERAU offers that the granting of this exemption request will have no negative impact on any entity 

involved in the training of pilots. 

Sincerely, 

~··· .:····. 

Embry-Riddle AeronautiG:al University 

ChiefFlight Instructor. ; ... ··. · ., ... ,. 

grauiva@erau.edu: : . ~c. ' .. 

386-226-6993 .· ., ; " 

.... , .. , 

. : _;·_.· .,.: ...... . 

. ,. 'J '' I ••! 

. ; .. : ·'· 

.·i ... 

. ' ; ; ~ ( . . 

,. "·· 

.. /: 

; :• . 

'.;- . 

600 S. Clyde Morris Blvd. 

Daytona Beach, FL 32114-3900 

embryriddle.edu
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 2, 2007



/s/    DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. Passeri President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 13-1500

WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON; GOD DYHU K. HARRISON; BIGAL M.A. 

HARRISON, 

Plaintiffs – Appellants, 

v. 

TROOPER J. M. WOODWARD, Virginia State Police; SERGEANT 

SMITH, Virginia State Police-Nine Mile Road Barracks; 

CAPTAIN GARY B. PAYNE, Virginia State Police; VIRGINIA 

STATE POLICE; CANAL INSURANCE COMPANY; BOB CARLTON, Agent 

of Canal Insurance, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:13-cv-00131-HEH) 

Submitted: August 13, 2013 Decided: August 23, 2013 

Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

William Henry Harrison, God Dyhu K. Harrison, Bigal M.A. 

Harrison, Appellants Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

Dismissed by Supreme Court, October 6, 2014
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s orders

dismissing this civil rights action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 

12(b)(6) and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Harrison v. Woodward, No. 3:13-cv-00131-HEH (E.D. Va. Mar. 5 & 

Apr. 9, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 22 (Thursday, February 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 6530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01955]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Initial 
Review Group; Mental Health Services Study Section.
    Date: February 29-March 1, 2024.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Aileen Schulte, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of 
Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20852, (301) 443-1225, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5a4b6a6adb0a9b1a085a8a4aca9ebabacadeba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86e7f5e5eef3eaf2e3c6ebe7efeaa8e8efeea8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 26, 2024.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01955 Filed 1-31-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER   1.
    
    I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 29, 2004
of Impreso, Inc. (the Report);  2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by the Report;  3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
the Report;  4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;  b)
    
    [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III.E.];  c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by the Report based on such evaluation; and  d)
    
    Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting;  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.  6.
    
    Item 4 Controls and Procedures in the Companys Form 10-Q is
incorporated herein by reference. Date: April 14, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Marshall D. SorokwaszMarshall D. SorokwaszChief Executive Officer and President
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§

No. 08-18-00024-CV

§

IN RE: J.M.G.,

 Relator.

§

§

§

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable Mike Herrera, Judge of the 383rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, and 

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. We 

therefore direct the trial court to vacate the order denying Relator’s plea to the jurisdiction and to 

dismiss the Real Party in Interest’s suit for possession or access, in accordance with the opinion of 

this Court. The writ of mandamus will issue only if the trial court fails to act in accordance with

our opinion and judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors




Board of Directors
Trusted Information Systems, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8) listed below of our report dated February 28, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Trusted Information Systems, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 27, 1996.

     1) No. 333-20311   1994 Stock Option Plan
     2) No. 333-20313   Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan




                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Vienna, Virginia
March 27, 1997
**EXHIBIT 10.29**

 

**SUMMARY OF 2006 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION**

 

The Company’s Board of Directors determines its compensation using data derived from third-party compensation surveys,data from comparable companies and consultation from an independent compensation consultant. Pursuant to the Compensation Committee and effective beginning January 1, 2006, each non-employee director will receive (i) a quarterly retainerof $10,000, (ii) a fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting that the non-employee director attends and (iii) reimbursement for all expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings. In addition, directors who serve on the AuditCommittee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will receive a fee of $500 for each such committee meeting attended. The Chairperson of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and CorporateGovernance Committee and the Lead Director will receive a quarterly retainer of $1,875. 

 

In addition to the foregoing cash compensation, each non-employee director will receive on a quarterly basis, a fully vested option for the purchase of 6,250 shares of the Company’s common stock at anexercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 466

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the rule providing

for termination of disabled adult child’s benefits upon marriage.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 23 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the

rule providing for termination of disabled adult child’s

benefits upon marriage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF RULE PROVIDING FOR TERMI4 NATION OF DISABLED ADULT CHILD’S BENE5 FITS UPON MARRIAGE.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 202(d) of the Social Secu7 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 402(d)) is amended—

8 (1) in paragraph (1)(D), by striking ‘‘or mar9 ries,’’;

10 (2) by striking paragraph (5); and
2

•S 466 IS

1 (3) in paragraph (6)—

2 (A) by inserting ‘‘(other than by reason of

3 death)’’ after ‘‘terminated’’,

4 (B) by striking ‘‘(provided no event speci5 fied in paragraph (1)(D) has occurred)’’, and

6 (C) by striking ‘‘the first month in which

7 an event specified in paragraph (1)(D) occurs’’

8 in subparagraph (C) and inserting ‘‘the month

9 in which the child’s death occurs’’.

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—

11 (1) Section 202(d) of such Act (as amended by

12 subsection (a)) is further amended by redesignating

13 paragraphs (6), (7), (8), and (9) as paragraphs (5),

14 (6), (7), and (8), respectively.

15 (2) Section 202(s)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

16 402(s)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘So much of sub17 sections (b)(3), (c)(4), (d)(5), (g)(3), and (h)(4) of

18 this section as precedes the semicolon,’’ and insert19 ing ‘‘Subsections (b)(3), (c)(4), (g)(3), and (h)(4) of

20 this section’’.

21 (3) Section 223(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C.

22 423(e)) is amended by striking ‘‘(d)(6)(A)(ii),

23 (d)(6)(B),’’ and inserting ‘‘(d)(5)(A)(ii), (d)(5)(B)’’.
3

•S 466 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

2 this section shall apply with respect to marriages occur3 ring on or after May 1, 1995.

Æ
Order filed March 21 , 201 3 , Withdrawn, Appeal Reinstated and Order filed

March 28, 2013

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 01102

- CR

____________ GUADALUPE MENDOZA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1025191



### ORDER

On March 21, 2013 , this Court issued an order abating the appeal and directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant failed to
file a brief

. Today, appellant filed a motion to reinstate the appeal because counsel inadvertently omitted this cause number from a motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief.The motion is granted. Our order of March 21, 2013 , is withdrawn. The

appeal is reinst ated. Appellant’s brief is due April 16, 2013

. PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from the
      audited  consolidated  financial  statements  at December  31, 1999 and is
      qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001012270
<NAME>                        CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         7,981
<SECURITIES>                                   6,386
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,536
<ALLOWANCES>                                   386
<INVENTORY>                                    695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,827
<PP&E>                                         976
<DEPRECIATION>                                 267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,840
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2
<COMMON>                                       86
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,563
<SALES>                                        15,211
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               16,081
<CGS>                                          3,139
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  31,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,591)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.82)


</TABLE>