Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices 8147 

1See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing 

Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 

83 FR 347 (January 3, 2018) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

15642 (March 14, 2023). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated April 19, 2023. 

4See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Voluntary 

Respondents,’’ dated September 22, 2023. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022,’’ dated September 22, 

2023. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of Administrative Review of 

the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Softwood 

Lumber Products from Canada; 2022,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce also 

intends upon publication of the final 

results, to instruct CBP to collect cash 

deposits of the estimated countervailing 

duties in the amounts calculated in the 

final results of this review for the 

respective companies listed above with 

regard to shipments of subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this review. If the rate 

calculated in the final results is zero or 

de minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required on shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of the final 

results of this review. 

For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will 

continue to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

all-others rate or the most recent 

company-specific rate applicable to the 

company, as appropriate. These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results of review 

are issued and published pursuant to 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: January 31, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope the Order 

IV. Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

V. Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

VI. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

VII. Subsidies Valuation 

VIII. Analysis of Programs 

IX. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Companies Rescinded From This 

Administrative Review 

1. Acciaierie Bertoli Safau S.p.A. 

2. ASFO S.p.A. 

3. Ellena S.p.A. 

4. Fomas S.p.A. 

5. Forge Monchieri S.p.A. 

6. Forgiatura Morandini S.r.l. 

7. Forgital Italy S.p.A. 

8. Galperti Group 

9. IMER International S.p.A. 

10. Industria Meccanica e Stampaggio S.p.A. 

11. Mimest S.p.A. 

12. Ofar S.p.A. 

13. Officine Galperti S.p.A. 

14. P. Technologies S.r.l. 

15. Poclain Hydraulics Indistriale S.r.l. 

16. Poppi Ugo Euroforge S.p.A. 

17. Riganti S.p.A. 

18. Ringmill S.p.A. 

19. Siderforgerossi Group S.p.A. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02392 Filed 2–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–122–858] 

Certain Softwood Lumber Products 

From Canada: Preliminary Results and 

Partial Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that countervailable 

subsidies are being provided to 

producers and exporters of certain 

softwood lumber products (softwood 

lumber) from Canada during the period 

of review (POR), January 1, 2022, 

through December 31, 2022. With 

respect to four companies, we are 

rescinding this administrative review 

because the companies are excluded 

from the countervailing duty (CVD) 

order on softwood lumber from Canada. 

Additionally, with respect to 70 

companies, we are rescinding this 

administrative review because either the 

request for review of the company was 

timely withdrawn or the company did 

not have any reviewable entries of 

subject merchandise during the POR. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable February 6, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samuel Brummitt, Laura Griffith, and 

Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7851, 

(202) 482–6430, and (202) 482–4793, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 3, 2018, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

CVD order on softwood lumber from 

Canada.1 Several interested parties 

requested that Commerce conduct an 

administrative review of the Order and, 

on March 14, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of initiation of the fifth 

administrative review.2 On April 19, 

2023, Commerce selected Canfor 

Corporation and West Fraser Mills Ltd. 

as the mandatory respondents in the 

administrative review.3 On September 

22, 2023, Commerce selected J.D. Irving, 

Limited and Tolko Marketing and Sales 

Ltd. and Tolko Industries Ltd. 

(collectively, Tolko) as voluntary 

respondents in the administrative 

review.4

On September 22, 2023, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review to January 31, 

2024, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2).5 For a complete 

description of the events that followed 

the initiation of this review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this order is 

certain softwood lumber products from 

Canada. For a complete description of 

the scope of the Order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
8148 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices 

7 D&G’s cross-owned companies are: Le Groupe 

Gesco-Star Ltee; Portbec Forest Products Ltd (aka 

Les Produits Forestiers Portbec Ltee); and Les 

Produits Forestiers Startrees Ltee. MLI’s crossowned companies are: Placements Marcel Lauzon 

Ltee and Investissements LRC Inc. NAFP’s crossowned companies are: Parent-Violette Gestion Ltee 

and Le Groupe Parent Ltee. Lemay’s cross-owned 

companies are: Bois Lemay Inc. and Industrie 

Lemay Inc. 

8See Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Notice of Reinstatement of Exclusion from 

the Countervailing Duty Order, 88 FR 85225 

(December 7, 2023). 

9The petitioner is the COALITION, an ad hoc 

association whose members are: U.S. Lumber 

Coalition, Inc.; Collum’s Lumber Products, L.L.C.; 

Fox Lumber Sales, Inc.; Hankins, Inc.; Pleasant 

River Lumber Company; PotlatchDeltic; S.I. Storey 

Lumber Co., Inc.; Stimson Lumber Company; 

Swanson Group; Weyerhaeuser Company; Giustina 

Land and Timber Company; and Sullivan Forestry 

Consultants, Inc. 

10See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of Request 

for Administrative Review,’’ dated June 12, 2023. 11See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 

12See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

13See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

On November 20, 2023, the U.S. Court 

of International Trade (CIT) issued an 

order in Committee Overseeing Action 

for Lumber International Trade 

Investigations or Negotiations v. United 

States, et. al., Consol. Ct. No. 19–00122 

(Slip Op. 23–163), reinstating the 

exclusion of Les Produits Forestiers 

D&G Ltee (D&G), Marcel Lauzon Inc. 

(MLI), North American Forest Products 

Ltd. (NAFP) (located in New 

Brunswick), and Scierie Alexandre 

Lemay & Fils Inc. (Lemay), and their 

cross-owned companies,7 from the 

Order. On December 7, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of reinstatement of exclusion 

from the Order for these companies with 

an effective date of August 28, 2021.8

Consequently, D&G, MLI, NAFP (located 

in New Brunswick), and Lemay, along 

with their cross-owned companies, are 

not subject to this administrative 

review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review if the party that 

requested the review withdraws its 

request within 90 days of the 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. On June 12, 2023, 

the petitioner 9 timely withdrew its 

request for administrative review of 

certain producers/exporters.10 With 

respect to 52 producers/exporters listed 

in the petitioner’s withdrawal of review 

request, neither the producer/exporter 

itself, nor any other party, besides the 

petitioner, requested a review. 

Accordingly, we are rescinding this 

review, with respect to the following 

companies, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1): 

1. 54 Reman 

2. 9224–5737 Quebec Inc. (aka A.G. Bois) 

3. AA Trading Ltd. 

4. All American Forest Products Inc. 

5. Anglo-American Cedar Products, Ltd. 

6. Bardobec Inc. 

7. Best Quality Cedar Products Ltd. 

8. Campbell River Shake & Shingle Co., Ltd. 

9. Canada Pallet Corp. 

10. Canasia Forest Industries Ltd. 

11. Careau Bois Inc. 

12. Cedar Island Forest Products Ltd. 

13. Cedar Valley Holdings Ltd. 

14. Cedarcoast Lumber Products 

15. Coast Mountain Cedar Products Ltd 

16. Comox Valley Shakes (2019) Ltd. 

17. CWP—Montreal inc. 

18. Direct Cedar Supplies Ltd. 

19. Distribution Rioux Inc. 

20. Elrod Cartage Ltd. 

21. Goldband Shake & Shingle Ltd. 

22. Groupe Lignarex Inc. 

23. Imperial Cedar Products, Ltd. 

24. Intertran Holdings Ltd. (dba Richmond 

Terminal) 

25. Island Cedar Products Ltd 

26. L’Atelier de Readaptation au travil de 

Beauce Inc. 

27. Les Bardeaux Lajoie Inc. 

28. Les Bois Traites M.G. Inc. 

29. Modern Terminal Ltd. 

30. Nagaard Sawmill Ltd. 

31. NSC Lumber Ltd. 

32. Pacific Coast Cedar Products Ltd 

33. Pacific Pallet, Ltd. 

34. Pat Power Forest Products Corporation 

35. Prendiville Industries Ltd. (aka Kenora 

Forest Products) 

36. Rick Dubois 

37. Roland Boulanger & Cie Ltee; Industries 

Daveluyville Inc.; Les Manufacturiers 

Warwick Ltee 

38. S&W Forest Products Ltd. 

39. Sapphire Lumber Company 

40. Sonora Logging Ltd. 

41. Source Forest Products 

42. South Fraser Container Terminals 

43. Star Lumber Canada Ltd 

44. Suncoh Custom Lumber Ltd. 

45. Surplus G Rioux 

46. Swiftwood Forest Products Ltd. 

47. T&P Trucking Ltd. 

48. Valley Cedar 2 Inc. 

49. Watkins Sawmills Ltd. 

50. Western Timber Products, Inc. 

51. Winton Homes Ltd. 

52. WWW Timber Products Ltd. 

Additionally, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce’s practice 

to rescind an administrative review of a 

CVD order where it concludes that there 

were no reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for an 

exporter or producer. Normally, upon 

completion of an administrative review, 

the suspended entries are liquidated at 

the CVD assessment rate for the review 

period.11 Therefore, for an 

administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended 

entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

liquidate at the calculated CVD 

assessment rate for the review period.12

Based on our analysis of CBP data and 

comments received from interested 

parties, we determine that 18 producers/ 

exporters, for which a review had been 

requested, had no reviewable 

shipments, sales, or entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR. 

Accordingly, absent evidence of a 

shipment on the record, Commerce is 

rescinding the administrative review of 

the following companies, pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(3): 

1. Burrows Lumber (CD) Ltd.; Theo A. 

Burrows Lumber Company Limited 

2. CarlWood Lumber Ltd. 

3. Central Forest Products Inc. 

4. Coast Clear Wood Ltd. 

5. Glandell Enterprises Inc. 

6. Les Produits Forestiers Sitka Inc. (aka Sitka 

Forest Products Inc.) 

7. Madera Forest Products INC 

8. Mainland Sawmill, a division of Terminal 

Forest Products Ltd. 

9. Oregon Canadian Forest Products Inc., dba 

Oregon Canadian Forest Products 

10. Pacific Lumber Remanufacturing Inc. 

11. Partap Industries 

12. Produits forestiers Temrex, s.e.c. (aka 

Temrex Forest Products LP) 

13. Silvaris Corporation 

14. Smart Wood Forest Products Ltd. 

15. Smartlam LLC 

16. Suncoast Industries Inc. 

17. Tenryu Canada Corporation 

18. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd. 

For further information, see ‘‘Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review’’ in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this CVD 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

each of the subsidy programs found 

countervailable, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by 

an ‘‘authority’’ that confers a benefit to 

the recipient, and that the subsidy is 

specific.13 For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

preliminary conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

The list of topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

included in Appendix I. 

Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected 

Companies Under Review 

There are 232 companies for which a 

review was requested and not rescinded 

but were not selected as mandatory 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices 8149 

14Commerce finds the following companies to be 

cross-owned with Canfor Corporation: Canadian 

Forest Products., Ltd. and Canfor Wood Products 

Marketing, Ltd. 

15Commerce finds the following companies to be 

cross-owned with J.D. Irving, Limited: Miramichi 

Timber Holdings Limited, The New Brunswick 

Railway Company, Rothesay Paper Holdings Ltd., 

and St. George Pulp & Paper Limited. 

16Commerce finds Meadow Lake OSB Mill Corp. 

and several holding companies, the identities of 

which are business proprietary, to be cross-owned 

with Tolko Marketing and Sales Ltd. and Tolko 

Industries Ltd. 

17Commerce finds the following companies to be 

cross-owned with West Fraser Mills Ltd.: Blue 

Ridge Lumber Inc., Manning Forest Products, Ltd., 

Sundre Forest Products Inc., Sunpine Inc., West 

Fraser Alberta Holdings, Ltd., and West Fraser 

Timber Co., Ltd. 

18See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Final Service Rule). 

20See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

21We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

22See APO and Final Service Rule. 

23For D&G, MLI, NAFP (located in New 

Brunswick), and Lemay, which are excluded from 

the Order, Commerce previously issued instructions 

to CBP discontinuing the suspension of liquidation 

of these companies’ entries that were entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or 

Continued 

respondents. The statute and 

Commerce’s regulations do not directly 

address the establishment of rates to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

individual examination where 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(e)(2) of the Act. However, 

Commerce normally determines the 

rates for non-selected companies in 

reviews in a manner that is consistent 

with section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in an investigation. 

Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act 

instructs Commerce, as a general rule, to 

calculate an all-others rate equal to the 

weighted average of the countervailable 

subsidy rates established for producers 

and/or exporters individually examined, 

excluding any zero, de minimis, or rates 

based entirely on facts available. In this 

review, none of the rates for the 

respondents were zero, de minimis, or 

based entirely on facts available. 

Therefore, for the POR, we are assigning 

to the non-selected companies an 

average of the subsidy rates calculated 

for the companies that were selected as 

respondents in the administrative 

review. 

For further information on the 

calculation of the non-selected rate, see 

‘‘Preliminary Ad Valorem Rate for NonSelected Companies under Review’’ in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

For a list of the non-selected companies, 

see Appendix II to this notice. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

For the period January 1, 2022, 

through December 31, 2022, we 

preliminarily determine the following 

estimated countervailable subsidy rates: 

Companies 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent 

ad valorem) 

Canfor Corporation and its 

cross-owned affiliates 14 .... 6.14 

Companies 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent 

ad valorem) 

J.D. Irving, Limited and its 

cross-owned affiliates 15 .... 3.88 

Tolko Marketing and Sales 

Ltd. and Tolko Industries 

Ltd.16 ................................. 9.61 

West Fraser Mills Ltd. and its 

cross-owned affiliates 17 .... 6.74 

Non-Selected Companies ..... 6.71 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose to parties to this 

proceeding the calculations performed 

in these preliminary results within five 

days of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b).18

Public Comment 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

five days after the date for filing case 

briefs.19 Interested parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding must submit: (1) a table of 

contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.20

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.21 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).22

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c)(2), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must do so 

within 30 days of publication of these 

preliminary results by submitting a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance using ACCESS. Requests 

should contain the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; the 

number of participants; and a list of the 

issues to be discussed. If a request for 

a hearing is made, Commerce intends to 

hold the hearing at a time and date to 

be determined. Parties should confirm 

the date and time of the hearing two 

days before the scheduled date. Parties 

are reminded that all briefs and hearing 

requests must be filed electronically 

using ACCESS and received 

successfully in their entirety by 5:00 

p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Final Results 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act, Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised by parties in their 

comments, within 120 days after the 

date of publication of these preliminary 

results. 

Assessment Rates 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4)(i), Commerce has 

preliminarily assigned the subsidy rates 

as indicated above. Pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, upon issuance of 

the final results, Commerce shall 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 41 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register, in accordance with 19 

CFR 356.8(a). If a timely summons is 

filed at the CIT, the assessment 

instructions will direct CBP not to 

liquidate relevant entries until the time 

for parties to file a request for statutory 

injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 

days of publication). 

For the companies for which this 

review is rescinded,23 Commerce will 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
8150 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices 

after August 28, 2021. Thus, we do not intend to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP for these 

companies. 

instruct CBP to assess countervailing 

duties on all appropriate entries at a rate 

equal to the cash deposit of estimated 

countervailing duties required at the 

time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, during the 

period January 1, 2022, through 

December 31, 2022, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce 

intends to issue rescission instructions 

to CBP no earlier than 41 days after the 

date of publication of the notice of 

rescission in the Federal Register. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(1) of the 

Act, Commerce intends, upon 

publication of the final results, to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts indicated above for each of the 

respective companies listed above and 

in Appendix II with regard to shipments 

of subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. For all non-reviewed 

companies, we will instruct CBP to 

collect cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties at the most recent 

company-specific or all-others rate 

applicable to the company, as 

appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results are issued 

and published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: January 31, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Review 

IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

V. Scope of the Order 

VI. New Subsidy Allegations 

VII. Subsidies Valuation 

VIII. Analysis of Programs 

IX. Preliminary Ad Valorem Rate for NonSelected Companies Under Review 

X. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

1 0752615 B.C Ltd; Fraserview 

Remanufacturing Inc, DBA Fraserview 

Cedar Products 

2 10104704 Manitoba Ltd O/A Woodstock 

Forest Products 

3 1074712 BC Ltd. (Quadra Cedar) 

4 5214875 Manitoba Ltd. 

5 Absolute Lumber Products, Ltd. 

6 Adwood Manufacturing Ltd. 

7 AJ Forest Products Ltd. 

8 Aler Forest Products, Ltd. 

9 Alpa Lumber Mills Inc. 

10 Andersen Pacific Forest Products Ltd. 

11 Antrim Cedar Corporation 

12 Aquila Cedar Products Ltd. 

13 Arbec Lumber Inc. (aka Arbec Bois 

Doeuvre Inc.) 

14 Aspen Pacific Industries Inc. 

15 Aspen Planers Ltd. 

16 B&L Forest Products Ltd. 

17 B.B. Pallets Inc. (aka Les Palettes B.B. Inc.) 

18 Babine Forest Products Limited 

19 Bakerview Forest Products Inc. 

20 Barrette-Chapais Ltee 

21 BarretteWood Inc. 

22 Benoit & Dionne Produits Forestiers Ltee 

(aka Benoit & Dionne Forest Products 

Ltd.) 

23 Blanchet Multi Concept Inc. 

24 Blanchette & Blanchette Inc. 

25 Bois Aise de Montreal Inc. 

26 Bois Bonsai Inc. 

27 Bois D’oeuvre Cedrico Inc. (aka Cedrico 

Lumber Inc.) 

28 Bois Daaquam inc. (aka Daaquam Lumber 

Inc.) 

29 Bois et Solutions Marketing SPEC, Inc. 

(aka SPEC Wood & Marketing Solution or 

SPEC Wood and Marketing Solutions 

Inc.) 

30 Bois Weedon Inc. 

31 Boisaco Inc. 

32 Boscus Canada Inc. 

33 Boucher Bros. Lumber Ltd. 

34 BPWood Ltd. 

35 Bramwood Forest Inc. 

36 Brink Forest Products Ltd. 

37 Brunswick Valley Lumber Inc. 

38 Busque & Laflamme Inc. 

39 Canadian Bavarian Millwork & Lumber 

Ltd. 

40 Canyon Lumber Company, Ltd. 

41 Carrier & Begin Inc. 

42 Carrier Forest Products Ltd. 

43 Carrier Lumber Ltd. 

44 Carter Forest Products Inc. 

45 Cedarland Forest Products Ltd. 

46 Cedarline Industries Ltd. 

47 Central Alberta Pallet Supply 

48 Central Cedar Ltd. 

49 Centurion Lumber Ltd. 

50 Chaleur Forest Products Inc. 

51 Chaleur Forest Products LP 

52 Channel-ex Trading Corporation 

53 CHAP Alliance Inc. 

54 Clair Industrial Development Corp. Ltd 

55 Clermond Hamel Ltee 

56 CLG Enterprises Inc. 

57 CNH Products Inc. 

58 Columbia River Shake & Shingle Ltd.; Teal 

Cedar Products Ltd., dba The Teal Jones 

Group 

59 Commonwealth Plywood Co. Ltd. 

60 Conifex Fibre Marketing Inc. 

61 Coulson Manufacturing Ltd. 

62 Cowichan Lumber Ltd. 

63 CS Manufacturing Inc., dba Cedarshed 

64 CWP Industriel Inc. (aka CWP—Industriel 

Inc.) 

65 D & D Pallets Ltd. 

66 Dakeryn Industries Ltd. 

67 Decker Lake Forest Products Ltd. 

68 Deep Cove Forest Products, Inc. 

69 Delco Forest Products Ltd. 

70 Delta Cedar Specialties Ltd. 

71 Devon Lumber Co. Ltd. 

72 DH Manufacturing Inc. 

73 Doubletree Forest Products Ltd. 

74 Downie Timber Ltd. 

75 Dunkley Lumber Ltd. 

76 EACOM Timber Corporation 

77 East Fraser Fiber Co. Ltd. 

78 Edgewood Forest Products Inc. 

79 ER Probyn Export Ltd. 

80 Falcon Lumber Ltd. 

81 Fontaine Inc.; Gestion Natanis Inc.; Les 

Placements Jean-Paul Fontaine Ltee; 

Placements Nicolas Fontaine Inc. 

82 Foothills Forest Products Inc. 

83 Fort St. James Forest Products Limited 

Partnership 

84 Fraser Specialty Products Ltd. 

85 FraserWood Industries Ltd. 

86 Furtado Forest Products Ltd. 

87 Galloway Lumber Company Ltd. 

88 Gilbert Smith Forest Products Ltd. 

89 Goldwood Industries Ltd. 

90 Goodfellow Inc. 

91 Gorman Bros. Lumber Ltd. 

92 Greendale Industries Inc. 

93 GreenFirst Forest Products (QC) Inc. 

94 Greenwell Resources Inc. 

95 Griff Building Supplies Ltd. 

96 Groupe Crete Chertsey Inc. 

97 Groupe Crete Division St-Faustin Inc. 

98 Groupe Lebel Inc. 

99 H.J. Crabbe & Sons Ltd. 

100 Haida Forest Products Ltd. 

101 Halo Sawmill Manufacturing Limited 

Partnership 

102 Hampton Tree Farms, LLC, dba Hampton 

Lumber Sales Canada 

103 Hornepayne Lumber LP 

104 Hudson Mitchell & Sons Lumber Inc. 

105 Hy Mark Wood Products Inc. 

106 Independent Building Materials 

Distribution Inc. 

107 Interfor Corporation 

108 Interfor Sales & Marketing Ltd. 

109 Ivor Forest Products Ltd. 

110 J&G Log Works Ltd. 

111 J.H. Huscroft Ltd. 

112 Jan Woodlands (2001) Inc. 

113 Jasco Forest Products Ltd. 

114 Jazz Forest Products Ltd. 

115 Jhajj Lumber Corporation 

116 Kalesnikoff Lumber Co. Ltd. 

117 Kan Wood, Ltd. 

118 Kebois Ltee/Ltd 

119 Kelfor Industries Ltd. 

120 Kermode Forest Products Ltd. 

121 Keystone Timber Ltd. 

122 La Crete Sawmills Ltd. 

123 Lafontaine Lumber Inc. 

124 Langevin Forest Products Inc. 

125 Lecours Lumber Co. Limited 

126 Leisure Lumber Ltd. 

127 Les Bois d’oeuvre Beaudoin Gauthier Inc. 

128 Les Bois Martek Lumber 

129 Les Chantiers de Chibougamau Ltd./Ltee 

130 Les Industries P.F. Inc. 

131 Leslie Forest Products Ltd. 

132 Lignum Forest Products LLP 

133 Linwood Homes Ltd. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices 8151 

24On March 21, 2023, Olympic Industries, Inc. 

and Olympic Industries ULC (collectively, 

Olympic) notified Commerce that Olympic 

Industries Inc-Reman Code, Olympic Industries 

ULC-Reman, and Olympic Industries ULC-Reman 

Code are no longer used by Olympic to export 

softwood lumber to the United States. See 

Olympic’s Letter, ‘‘Response to Department of 

Commerce’s Clarification Request,’’ dated March 

21, 2023. 

1See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and 

Rescission, in Part; 2022, 88 FR 69618 (October 6, 

2023) (Preliminary Results). 

2For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2021, 88 FR 

8405 (February 9, 2023). 

134 Lonestar Lumber lnc. 

135 Lulumco Inc. 

136 Magnum Forest Products, Ltd. 

137 Maibec Inc. 

138 Manitou Forest Products Ltd 

139 Marwood Ltd. 

140 Materiaux Blanchet Inc. 

141 Metrie Canada Ltd. 

142 Mid Valley Lumber Specialties Ltd. 

143 Midway Lumber Mills Ltd. 

144 Mill & Timber Products Ltd. 

145 Millar Western Forest Products Ltd. 

146 Mirax Lumber Products Ltd. 

147 Mobilier Rustique (Beauce) Inc.; J.F.S.R. 

Inc.; Gestion C.A. Rancourt Inc.; Gestion 

J.F. Rancourt Inc.; Gestion Suzie 

Rancourt Inc.; Gestion P.H.Q. Inc.; 9331– 

3419 Quebec Inc.; 9331–3468 Quebec 

Inc.; SPQ Inc. 

148 Monterra Lumber Mills Limited 

149 Morwood Forest Products Inc. 

150 Multicedre ltee 

151 Murray Brothers Lumber Company Ltd 

152 Nakina Lumber Inc. 

153 National Forest Products Ltd. 

154 Nicholson and Cates Ltd. 

155 NorSask Forest Products Limited 

Partnership/NorSask Forest Products Inc. 

156 North American Forest Products Ltd. 

(located in Abbotsford, British Columbia) 

157 North Enderby Timber Ltd. 

158 Northland Forest Products Ltd. 

159 Oakwood Manufacturing, A Division of 

Weston Forest Products Inc. 

160 Olympic Industries, Inc.; Olympic 

Industries ULC24

161 Pacific NorthWest Lumber Ltd. 

162 Pacific Western Wood Works Ltd. 

163 PalletSource Inc. 

164 Parallel Wood Products Ltd. 

165 Partap Forest Products Ltd. 

166 Peak Industries (Cranbrook) Ltd. 

167 Phoenix Forest Products Inc. 

168 Pine Ideas Ltd. 

169 Pioneer Pallet & Lumber Ltd. 

170 Porcupine Wood Products Ltd. 

171 Power Wood Corp. 

172 Precision Cedar Products Corp. 

173 Produits Forestiers Petit Paris Inc. 

174 Produits Matra Inc.; Sechoirs de Beauce 

Inc.; Bois Ouvre de Beauceville (1992), 

Inc. 

175 Promobois G.D.S. Inc. 

176 R.A. Green Lumber Ltd. 

177 Rayonier A.M. Canada GP 

178 Rembos Inc. 

179 Rene Bernard inc. 

180 Resolute FP Canada Inc.; 9192–8515 

Quebec Inc.; Abitibi-Bowater Canada 

Inc.; Bowater Canadian Ltd.; Produits 

Forestiers Maurice SEC.; Resolute Forest 

Products Inc. 

181 Rielly Industrial Lumber Inc. 

182 River City Remanufacturing Inc. 

183 S&R Sawmills Ltd. 

184 San Group 

185 San Industries Ltd. 

186 Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd. 

187 Scierie St-Michel Inc. 

188 Scierie West Brome Inc. 

189 Scott Lumber Sales Ltd. 

190 Shakertown Corp. 

191 Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd. 

192 Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd. 

193 Skana Forest Products Ltd. 

194 Skeena Sawmills Ltd. 

195 South Beach Trading Inc. 

196 South Coast Reman Ltd. 

197 Southcoast Millwork Ltd. 

198 Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc. (aka 

SBC) 

199 Spruceland Millworks Inc. 

200 Sundher Timber Products Inc. 

201 Surrey Cedar Ltd. 

202 Taan Forest Limited Partnership (aka 

Taan Forest Products) 

203 Taiga Building Products Ltd. 

204 Tall Tree Lumber Company 

205 Terminal Forest Products Ltd. 

206 TG Wood Products 

207 The Wood Source Inc. 

208 Top Quality Lumber Ltd. 

209 Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd. 

210 Triad Forest Products Ltd. 

211 Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc. 

212 Tyee Timber Products Ltd. 

213 Universal Lumber Sales Ltd. 

214 Usine Sartigan Inc. 

215 Vaagen Fibre Canada, ULC 

216 Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products Ltd. 

217 Vanderhoof Specialty Wood Products 

Ltd. 

218 Vanderwell Contractors (1971) Ltd. 

219 Visscher Lumber Inc. 

220 W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc. 

221 West Bay Forest Products Ltd. 

222 West Coast Panel Cutters 

223 Western Forest Products Inc. 

224 Western Lumber Sales Limited 

225 Westminster Industries Ltd. 

226 Weston Forest Products Inc. 

227 Westrend Exteriors Inc. 

228 Weyerhaeuser Co. 

229 White River Forest Products L.P. 

230 Woodline Forest Products Ltd. 

231 Woodstock Forest Products 

232 Woodtone Specialties Inc. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02387 Filed 2–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) continues to 

determine that the sole respondent 

under review, VidaXL Ningbo Industry 

Co., Ltd. (VidaXL), is not eligible for a 

separate rate and is, therefore, part of 

the China-wide entity. The period of 

review (POR) is January 1, 2022, 

through December 31, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable February 6, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Krisha Hill, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4037. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 6, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

preliminary results of the 2022 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on wooden 

bedroom furniture from the People’s 

Republic of China (China).1 We invited 

interested parties to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. No parties 

commented on the Preliminary Results. 

Accordingly, the Preliminary Results 

remain unchanged in the final results of 

this review. Commerce conducted this 

review in accordance with section 751 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). 

Scope of the Order 2

The product covered by the order is 

wooden bedroom furniture from China. 

Imports of subject merchandise are 

classified under the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings: 9403.50.9041, 

9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 

9403.50.9080, 9403.91.0005, 

9403.91.0010, 9403.91.0080, 

7009.92.1090 or 7009.92.5095. Although 

the HTSUS subheadings are provided 

for convenience and customs purposes, 

the written description of the scope of 

the order is dispositive. 

Final Results of Review 

Consistent with the Preliminary 

Results, we continue to determine that 

the sole respondent under review, 

VidaXL, did not establish its eligibility 

for a separate rate and is part of the 

China-wide entity. Because no party 

requested a review of the China-wide 

entity, and Commerce no longer 

considers the China-wide entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1