Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 43 / Thursday, March 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 11887 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

determined that this rule does not have 

implications for federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This rule will not cause a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications under Executive 

Order 12630, Governmental Actions and 

Interference with Constitutionally 

Protected Property Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This rule meets applicable standards 

in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to 

minimize litigation, eliminate 

ambiguity, and reduce burden. 

10. Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Executive Order 13045, Protection of 

Children from Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not 

an economically significant rule and 

does not create an environmental risk to 

health or risk to safety that may 

disproportionately affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This action is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under Executive Order 

13211, Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This rule does not use technical 

standards. Therefore, we did not 

consider the use of voluntary consensus 

standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Management Directive 023–01 and 

Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 

which guide the Coast Guard in 

complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have determined that this action is one 

of a category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves 

creation of safety zones from mile 38.0 

to mile 46.0, and from mile 78.0 to mile 

81.0 UMR. This rule is categorically 

excluded from further review under 

paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the 

Commandant Instruction. An 

environmental analysis checklist and a 

categorical exclusion determination are 

available in the docket where indicated 

under the ADDRESSES. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

Accordingly, the interim rule 

amending 33 CFR part 165 that 

published at 77 FR 75850 on December 

26, 2012, is adopted as a final rule 

without change. 

Dated: December 29, 2014. 

R.V. Timme, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Ohio Valley. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03331 Filed 3–4–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0810; FRL–9923–94– 

Region 4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Tennessee; 

Emissions Statement Requirement for 

the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve a revision to the 

Tennessee state implementation plan 

(SIP) submitted by the State of 

Tennessee, through the Tennessee 

Department of Environment and 

Conservation (TDEC) on January 5, 

2015, to address the emissions 

statement requirements for the 2008 8- 

hour ozone national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS). The revision affects 

Davidson, Rutherford, Shelby, Sumner, 

Knox, Blount, Anderson, Williamson, 

and Wilson Counties. Annual emissions 

statements are required for certain 

sources in all ozone nonattainment 

areas. These changes address 

requirements for the Knoxville, 

Tennessee 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS 

nonattainment area (hereinafter referred 

to as the Knoxville Area) and the 

Tennessee portion of the Memphis, 

Tennessee-Arkansas-Mississippi 2008 8- 

hour ozone NAAQS nonattainment area 

(hereinafter referred to as the Memphis 

Area). The Knoxville Area is comprised 

of Knox and Blount County, and a 

portion of Anderson County, Tennessee, 

and the Tennessee portion of the 

Memphis Area is comprised of Shelby 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

11888 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 43 / Thursday, March 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

County, Tennessee. Davidson, 

Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, 

Wilson and the remaining portion of 

Anderson County are not part of an 

ozone nonattainment area. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

May 4, 2015 without further notice, 

unless EPA receives adverse comment 

by April 6, 2015. If EPA receives such 

comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register informing the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2014–0810, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4-ARMS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2014– 

0810,’’ Air Regulatory Management 

Section (formerly the Regulatory 

Development Section), Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch (formerly the 

Air Planning Branch), Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Chief, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2014– 

0810. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http://www.

epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jane 

Spann, Air Regulatory Management 

Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Ms. 

Spann can be reached at (404) 562–9029 

and via electronic mail at spann.jane@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On March 12, 2008, EPA promulgated 

a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.075 

parts per million (ppm). See 73 FR 

16436 (March 27, 2008). Under EPA’s 

regulations at 40 CFR part 50, the 2008 

8-hour ozone NAAQS is attained when 

the 3-year average of the annual fourth 

highest daily maximum 8-hour average 

ambient air quality ozone 

concentrations is less than or equal to 

0.075 ppm. 40 CFR 50.15. Ambient air 

quality monitoring data for the 3-year 

period must meet a data completeness 

requirement. The ambient air quality 

monitoring data completeness 

requirement is met when the average 

percent of days with valid ambient 

monitoring data is greater than 90 

percent, and no single year has less than 

75 percent data completeness as 

determined in Appendix I of part 50. 

Upon promulgation of a new or 

revised NAAQS, the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or Act) requires EPA to designate 

as nonattainment any area that is 

violating the NAAQS, based on the 

three most recent years of ambient air 

quality data at the conclusion of the 

designation process. The Knoxville Area 

was designated nonattainment for the 

2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS on April 30, 

2012 (effective July 20, 2012) using 

2009–2011 ambient air quality data. See 

77 FR 30088 (April 30, 2012). At the 

time of designation, the Knoxville Area 

was classified as a Marginal 

nonattainment area for the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. The Memphis Area was 

designated nonattainment for the 2008 

8-hour ozone NAAQS on April 30, 2012 

(effective July 20, 2012) using 2008– 

2010 ambient air quality data. See 77 FR 

30088 (April 30, 2012). At the time of 

designation, the Memphis Area was 

classified as a Marginal nonattainment 

area for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

Based on these nonattainment 

designations, Tennessee was required to 

develop SIP revisions addressing ozone 

nonattainment requirements of the CAA 

for the Knoxville and Memphis Areas. 

Specifically, pursuant to CAA section 

182(a)(3)(B), Tennessee was required to 

submit a SIP revision addressing 

emissions statements for these two 

Areas. 

Ground level ozone is not emitted 

directly into the air, but is created by 

chemical reactions between oxides of 

nitrogen (NOX) and volatile organic 

compounds (VOC) in the presence of 

sunlight. Emissions from industrial 

facilities and electric utilities, motor 

vehicle exhaust, gasoline vapors, and 

chemical solvents are some of the major 

sources of NOX and VOC. Section 

182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA requires each 

state with ozone nonattainment areas to 

submit a SIP revision requiring annual 

emissions statements to be submitted to 

the state by the owner or operator of 

each NOX or VOC stationary source 

located within a nonattainment area, 

showing the actual emissions of NOX

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 43 / Thursday, March 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 11889 

1A state may waive the emission statement 

requirement for any class or category of stationary 

sources which emit less than 25 tons per year of 

VOCs or NOX if the state meets the requirements 

of section 182(a)(3)(B)(ii). 

and VOC from that source.1 The first 

statement is due three years from the 

area’s nonattainment designation, and 

subsequent statements are due at least 

annually thereafter. 

On January 5, 2015, Tennessee 

submitted a SIP revision revising its 

existing Rule 1200–03–18–.02, ‘‘General 

Provisions and Applicability,’’ which 

amends its emissions statement 

requirements to address the Knoxville 

and Memphis Areas under CAA section 

182(a)(3)(B). EPA is now taking action to 

approve this SIP revision as meeting the 

requirements of sections 110 and 

182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA for those Areas. 

More information on EPA’s analysis of 

Tennessee’s SIP revision is provided 

below. 

II. Analysis of the State’s Submittal 

Tennessee’s January 5, 2015, 

submission seeks to modify its SIP to 

reflect recent changes to the emissions 

statement requirements in State Rule 

1200–03–18–.02(8). EPA initially 

approved this state regulation into 

Tennessee’s SIP in 1995. See 60 FR 

10504 (February 27, 1995). At that time, 

the regulation applied to stationary 

sources within Davidson, Rutherford, 

Shelby, Sumner, Williamson, and 

Wilson Counties. Tennessee modified 

State Rule 1200–03–18–.02(8) in 2014 to 

include Anderson, Blount, and Knox 

counties; clarify that all owners or 

operators of stationary sources with 

actual emissions of 25 tons per year or 

more of VOC or NOX within these nine 

counties must generate emissions 

statements; and allow subject sources in 

counties that operate their own air 

pollution program to send these 

statements to the local permitting 

authority rather than to the Technical 

Secretary of the Tennessee Air Pollution 

Control Board. EPA has determined that 

this amended regulation meets all of the 

requirements of CAA section 

182(a)(3)(B) for the Knoxville and 

Memphis Areas because it covers the 

counties within those nonattainment 

areas and satisfies the applicability, 

certification, and other emissions 

statement criteria contained therein. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is approving Tennessee’s January 

5, 2015, SIP revision addressing 

emissions statement requirements 

because the State’s submission meets 

the requirements of sections 110 and 

182 of the CAA. EPA is publishing this 

rule without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. However, in the proposed 

rules section of this Federal Register 

publication, EPA is publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposal to approve the SIP revision 

should adverse comments be filed. This 

rule will be effective May 4, 2015 

without further notice unless the 

Agency receives adverse comments by 

April 6, 2015. 

If EPA receives such comments, then 

EPA will publish a document 

withdrawing the final rule and 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. All public comments 

received will then be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Parties 

interested in commenting should do so 

at this time. If no such comments are 

received, the public is advised that this 

rule will be effective on May 4, 2015 

and no further action will be taken on 

the proposed rule. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), nor will it impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by May 4, 2015. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

11890 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 43 / Thursday, March 5, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. See section 307(b)(2). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: February 13, 2015. 

V. Anne Heard, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

Therefore, 40 CFR part 52 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart RR—Tennessee 

■ 2. In § 52.2220, table 1 in paragraph 

(c) is amended by revising the entry 

‘‘Section 1200–3–18–.02’’ to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.2220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

TABLE 1—EPA APPROVED TENNESSEE REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Chapter 1200–3–18 Volatile Organic Compounds 

*******

Section 1200–3–18–.02 General Provisions and 

Applicability.

12/18/2014 3/5/2015 [Insert Federal 

Register citation].

Adds Knox, Blount, and Anderson County to 

Emissions Statement requirement applicability; 

clarifies that 25 tons or more NOX sources are 

required to submit in addition to VOC sources; 

and allows subject sources to send statements 

to the local permitting authority rather than to 

the Technical Secretary of the Tennessee Air 

Pollution Control Board. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–04489 Filed 3–4–15; 08:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0798; FRL 9923–92– 

Region 4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; Mississippi: 

New Source Review—Prevention of 

Significance Deterioration 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve revisions to the Mississippi 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

submitted by the State of Mississippi, 

through the Mississippi Department of 

Environmental Quality (MDEQ), on 

February 10, 2012. The SIP revision 

modifies Mississippi’s New Source 

Review (NSR) Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) program to 

incorporate by reference (IBR) certain 

Federal PSD regulations. The revision 

also removes certain language from the 

SIP that is no longer relevant. EPA is 

approving Mississippi’s February 10, 

2012, revision to Mississippi’s SIP 

because the Agency has determined that 

the changes are consistent with the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA’s 

PSD permitting regulations. 

DATES: This rule is effective April 6, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2012–0798. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the www.regulations.gov 

Web site. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Regulatory Management Section 

(formerly the Regulatory Development 

Section), Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch (formerly the 

Air Planning Branch), Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tiereny Bell, Air Regulatory and 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, 

Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, 

Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone 

number is (404) 562–9088. Ms. Bell can 

also be reached via electronic mail at 

bell.tiereny@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES