8996 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated 

implementing instructions, and 

Environmental Planning COMDTINST 

5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves two 

safety zones to protect waterway users 

that would prohibit entry within 250 

yards of dredging operations and will 

close only one side of the main 

navigation channel. Vessels can request 

permission to enter the channel. It is 

categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph L60(a) of 

Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction 

Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A 

Record of Environmental Consideration 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket. For instructions 

on locating documents mentioned in 

this preamble as being available in the 

docket, see the ADDRESSES section of 

this preamble. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T05–1004, to read as 

follows. 

§ 165.T05–1004 Safety Zones, Delaware 

River Dredging; Marcus Hook, PA 

(a) Location. The following areas are 

safety zones: 

(1) Safety Zone One includes all 

waters within 250 yards of the dredge 

displaying lights and shapes for vessels 

restricted in ability to maneuver as 

described in 33 CFR 83.27, as well as all 

related dredge equipment, while the 

dredge is operating in Marcus Hook 

Range. For enforcement purposes 

Marcus Hook Range includes all 

navigable waters of the Delaware River 

shoreline to shoreline, bound by a line 

drawn perpendicular to the center line 

of the channel at the farthest upriver 

point of the range to a line drawn 

perpendicular to the center line of the 

channel at the farthest downriver point 

of the range. 

(2) Safety Zone Two includes all the 

waters of Anchorage 7 off Marcus Hook 

Range, as described in 33 CFR 

110.157(a)(8) and depicted on U.S. 

Nautical Chart 12312. 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section— 

Designated representative means any 

Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or 

petty officer who has been authorized 

by the Captain of the Port to assist with 

enforcement of the safety zones 

described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of 

this section. 

(c) Regulations. (1) Entry into or 

transiting within Safety Zone One is 

prohibited unless vessels obtain 

permission from the Captain of the Port 

via VHF–FM channel 16 or 215–271– 

4807, or make satisfactory passing 

arrangements via VHF–FM channel 13 

or 16 with the operating dredge per this 

section and the rules of the Road (33 

CFR subchapter E). Vessels requesting to 

transit shall contact the operating 

dredge via VHF–FM channel 13 or 16 at 

least 1 hour prior to arrival. 

(2) Vessels desiring to anchor in 

Safety Zone Two, Anchorage 7 off 

Marcus Hook Range, must obtain 

permission from the COTP at least 24 

hours in advance by calling (215) 271– 

4807. The COTP will permit, at 

maximum, one vessel at a time to 

anchor on a ‘‘first-come, first-served’’ 

basis. Vessels will only be allowed to 

anchor for a 12 hour period. Vessels that 

require an examination by the Public 

Health Service, Customs, or Immigration 

authorities will be directed to an 

anchorage for the required inspection by 

the COTP. 

(3) Vessels desiring to anchor in 

Safety Zone Two, Anchorage 7 off 

Marcus Hook Range, must be at least 

650 feet in length overall. 

(4) This section applies to all vessels 

except those engaged in the following 

operations: enforcement of laws, service 

of aids to navigation, and emergency 

response. 

(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast 

Guard may be assisted by federal, state 

and local agencies in the patrol and 

enforcement of the zone. 

(e) Enforcement period. This rule will 

be in effect and subject to enforcement 

from February 6, 2024 through April 30, 

2024. If the Captain of the Port 

determines that conditions no longer 

warrant enforcement of the rule, he will 

provide notice to that effect via Marine 

Safety Information Bulletin and 

Broadcast Notice to Mariners. 

Dated: February 6, 2024. 

Kate F. Higgins-Bloom, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the 

Port, Delaware Bay. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02704 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2022–0630; FRL–11582– 

02–R4] 

Air Plan Approval; Georgia; Vehicle 

Inspection and Maintenance Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 8997 

1On November 6, 1991, EPA designated and 

classified the following counties in and around the 

Atlanta, Georgia, metropolitan area as a serious 

ozone nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone 

NAAQS: Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, 

Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, 

Paulding, and Rockdale. See 56 FR 56694. 

2See CAA section 110(l). 3 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is approving changes to 

Georgia’s State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) submitted by the State of Georgia 

through the Georgia Department of 

Natural Resources (GA DNR), 

Environmental Protection Division 

(EPD), on June 8, 2022, and on June 6, 

2023. Georgia’s June 8, 2022, SIP 

revision (hereinafter referred to as 

Georgia’s 2022 I/M SIP revision) 

removes obsolete references and 

provisions; updates the State’s 

inspection and maintenance (I/M) 

requirements; updates terminology, in 

part to reflect advances in test and 

vehicle technology; and makes other 

minor changes. The June 6, 2023, SIP 

revision (hereinafter referred to as 

Georgia’s 2023 I/M SIP revision) 

removes outdated terminology; updates 

with new terminology; removes one 

requirement; and makes other minor 

changes to Georgia’s enhanced I/M 

program. EPA is approving these 

changes pursuant to the Clean Air Act 

(CAA or Act). 

DATES: This rule is effective March 11, 

2024. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– 

2022–0630. All documents in the docket 

are listed on the regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information may not be publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Regulatory Management Section, 

Air Planning and Implementation 

Branch, Air and Radiation Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, 

Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that 

you contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Weston Freund, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air and 

Radiation Division, Region 4, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 61 

Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 

30303–8960. The telephone number is 

(404) 562–8773. Mr. Freund can also be 

reached via electronic mail at 

freund.weston@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In 1991, EPA classified a 13-county 

area in and around the Atlanta, Georgia, 

metropolitan area as a serious ozone 

nonattainment area for the 1979 1-hour 

ozone national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS or standard), 

triggering the requirement for the State 

to establish an enhanced I/M program 

for the area.1 In 1996, Georgia submitted 

its enhanced I/M program to EPA for 

incorporation into the SIP. EPA granted 

interim approval of the State’s program 

in 1997 and full approval in 2000. See 

62 FR 42916 (August 11, 1997) and 65 

FR 4133 (January 26, 2000), 

respectively. 

On June 8, 2022, and June 6, 2023, 

Georgia submitted SIP revisions seeking 

to amend various I/M regulations in 

Chapter 391–3–20—Enhanced 

Inspection and Maintenance, of 

Georgia’s SIP. In this rulemaking, EPA 

is approving changes to Rules 391–3– 

20–.01—Definitions; Rule 391–3–20– 

.03, Covered Vehicles; Exemptions; Rule 

391–3–20–.04—Emission Inspection 

Procedures; Rule 391–3–20–.05— 

Emission Standards; Rule 391–3–20– 

.09—Inspection Station Requirements; 

Rule 391–3–20–.10—Certificates of 

Authorization; Rule 391–3–20–.11— 

Inspector Qualifications and 

Certification; Rule 391–3–20–.13— 

Certificate of Emission Inspection; Rule 

391–3–20–.15—Repairs and Retests; 

Rule 391–3–20–.17—Waivers; and Rule 

391–3–20–.22—Enforcement. EPA is 

approving these revisions because these 

changes will not interfere with any 

applicable requirement concerning 

attainment and reasonable further 

progress, or any other applicable CAA 

requirement.2

In a notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM), published on December 21, 

2023 (88 FR 88310), EPA proposed to 

approve the June 8, 2022, and June 6, 

2023, SIP submissions. The details of 

Georgia’s submissions, which remove 

obsolete references and provisions; 

update the State’s I/M requirements; 

update and remove outdated 

terminology; remove a requirement; and 

makes other minor changes to Georgia’s 

enhanced I/M program of the Georgia 

SIP, as well as EPA’s rationale for 

approve the changes, are described in 

the December 21, 2023, NPRM. 

Comments on the December 21, 2023, 

NPRM were due on or before January 

22, 2024. No comments were received 

on the NPRM, adverse or otherwise. 

II. Incorporation by Reference 

In this document, EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, and as discussed in Section I of 

this preamble, EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of Georgia 

Rule 391–3–20–.09—Inspection Station 

Requirements; Rule 391–3–20–.10— 

Certificates of Authorization; Rule 391– 

3–20–.13—Certificate of Emission 

Inspection; Rule 391–3–20–.15—Repairs 

and Retests; Rule 391–3–20–.17— 

Waivers; and Rule 391–3–20–.22— 

Enforcement, all of which have a stateeffective date of April 19, 2022, into the 

Georgia SIP. Further, EPA is finalizing 

the incorporation by reference of 

Georgia Rule 391–3–20–.01— 

Definitions; Rule 391–3–20–.03, Covered 

Vehicles; Exemptions; Rule 391–3–20– 

.04—Emission Inspection Procedures; 

Rule 391–3–20–.05—Emission 

Standards, and Rule 391–3–20–.11— 

Inspector Qualifications and 

Certification, all of which have a stateeffective date of March 21, 2023, into 

the Georgia SIP. EPA has made, and will 

continue to make, these materials 

generally available through 

www.regulations.gov and at the EPA 

Region 4 Office (please contact the 

person identified in the ‘‘For Further 

Information Contact’’ section of this 

preamble for more information). 

Therefore, the revised materials as 

stated above, have been approved by 

EPA for inclusion in the State 

implementation plan, have been 

incorporated by reference by EPA into 

that plan, are fully federally enforceable 

under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA 

as of the effective date of the final 

rulemaking of EPA’s approval, and will 

be incorporated by reference in the next 

update to the SIP compilation.3

III. Final Actions 

EPA is approving the aforementioned 

changes to various I/M regulations in 

Chapter 391–3–20—Enhanced 

Inspection and Maintenance, of the 

Georgia SIP. Specifically, EPA is 

finalizing the approval of the June 8, 

2022, and June 6, 2023, SIP revisions 

which amends Georgia Rules 391–3–20– 

.01—Definitions; Rule 391–3–20–.03, 

Covered Vehicles; Exemptions; Rule 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
8998 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 

391–3–20–.04—Emission Inspection 

Procedures; Rule 391–3–20–.05— 

Emission Standards; Rule 391–3–20– 

.09—Inspection Station Requirements; 

Rule 391–3–20–.10—Certificates of 

Authorization; Rule 391–3–20–.11— 

Inspector Qualifications and 

Certification; Rule 391–3–20–.13— 

Certificate of Emission Inspection; Rule 

391–3–20–.15—Repairs and Retests; 

Rule 391–3–20–.17—Waivers; and Rule 

391–3–20–.22—Enforcement. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, these actions 

merely approve state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and do not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

these actions: 

• Are not significant regulatory 

actions subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 

21879, April 11, 2023); 

• Do not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Are certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Do not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Do not have federalism implications 

as specified in Executive Order 13132 

(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); 

• Are not subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) 

because they approve a state program; 

• Are not significant regulatory 

actions subject to Executive Order 

13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and 

• Are not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA. 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the proposed rule does 

not have tribal implications and will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

Executive Order 12898 (Federal 

Actions to Address Environmental 

Justice in Minority Populations and 

Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, 

Feb. 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies 

to identify and address 

‘‘disproportionately high and adverse 

human health or environmental effects’’ 

of their actions on minority populations 

and low-income populations to the 

greatest extent practicable and 

permitted by law. EPA defines 

environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of all people regardless of race, color, 

national origin, or income with respect 

to the development, implementation, 

and enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies.’’ EPA further 

defines the term fair treatment to mean 

that ‘‘no group of people should bear a 

disproportionate burden of 

environmental harms and risks, 

including those resulting from the 

negative environmental consequences of 

industrial, governmental, and 

commercial operations or programs and 

policies.’’ 

EPD did not evaluate EJ 

considerations as part of its SIP 

submittals; the CAA and applicable 

implementing regulations neither 

prohibit nor require such an evaluation. 

EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and 

did not consider EJ in these actions. Due 

to the nature of the actions being taken 

here, these actions are expected to have 

a neutral to positive impact on the air 

quality of the affected area. 

Consideration of EJ is not required as 

part of these actions, and there is no 

information in the record inconsistent 

with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of 

achieving EJ for people of color, lowincome populations, and Indigenous 

peoples. 

These actions are subject to the 

Congressional Review Act, and EPA will 

submit a rule report to each House of 

the Congress and to the Comptroller 

General of the United States. These 

actions are not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined 

by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

these actions must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by April 9, 2024. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of these actions for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. These actions 

may not be challenged later in 

proceedings to enforce its requirements. 

(See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen 

dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: February 2, 2024. 

Jeaneanne Gettle, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part 

52 as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart L—Georgia 

■ 2. In § 52.570(c), amend Table (1) by 

revising the entries for ‘‘Rule 391–3–20– 

.01,’’ ‘‘Rule 391–3–20–.03,’’ ‘‘Rule 391– 

3–20–.04,’’ ‘‘Rule 391–3–20–.05,’’ ‘‘Rule 

391–3–20–.09,’’ ‘‘Rule 391–3–20–.10,’’ 

‘‘Rule 391–3–20–.11,’’ ‘‘Rule 391–3–20– 

.13,’’ ‘‘Rule 391–3–20–.15,’’ ‘‘Rule 391– 

3–20–.17,’’ and ‘‘Rule 391–3–20–.22.’’ 

The amendments read as follows: 

§ 52.570 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 8999 

TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (c)—EPA-APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS

State citation Title/subject 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

391–3–20 ....................... Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance 

391–3–20–.01 ................ Definitions ..................... 3/21/2023 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–20–.03 ................ Covered Vehicles; Exemptions.3/21/2023 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–20–.04 ................ Emission Inspection 

Procedures.

3/21/2023 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–20–.05 ................ Emission Standards ...... 3/21/2023 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–20–.09 ................ Inspection Station Requirements.4/19/2022 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–20–.10 ................ Certificates of Authorization.4/19/2022 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–20–.11 ................ Inspector Qualifications 

and Certification.

3/21/2023 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–20–.13 ................ Certificate of Emission 

Inspection.

4/19/2022 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

391–3–20–.15 ................ Repairs and Retests ..... 4/19/2022 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–20–.17 ................ Waivers ......................... 4/19/2022 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

*******

391–3–20–.22 ................ Enforcement .................. 4/19/2022 2/9/2024, [Insert citation 

of publication].

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2024–02521 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0479; FRL–11425– 

03–R9] 

Air Plan Approval; California; 

California Air Resources Board; 

Volatile Organic Compounds 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve a revision to the California Air 

Resources Board (CARB) portion of the 

California State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). This revision concerns emissions 

of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) 

from vapor recovery systems of gasoline 

cargo tanks. We are approving a local 

rule that regulates this emission source 

under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the 

Act). 

DATES: This rule is effective March 11, 

2024. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0479. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the https://www.regulations.gov 

website. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available through https://

www.regulations.gov, or please contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section for 

additional availability information. If 

you need assistance in a language other 

than English or if you are a person with 

a disability who needs a reasonable 

accommodation at no cost to you, please 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: La 

Kenya Evans-Hopper, EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 

94105. By phone: (415) 972–3245 or by 

email at evanshopper.lakenya@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses 

III. EPA Action 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On November 2, 2023 (88 FR 75246), 

the EPA proposed to approve the 

following rule into the California SIP. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1