alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 24 (Monday, February 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 7707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02393]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, February 8, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th 
floor) and virtual.

    Note:  For those attending the meeting in person, current COVID-
19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC COVID-
19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on 
the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See 
the contact page at https://www.fec.gov/contact/. If you would like 
to virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.


STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-
referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and 
corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting 
virtually, go to the Commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Draft Advisory Opinion 2024-02: Congresswoman Maxine Waters and 
Citizens for Waters
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Madison Project, Inc. 
(A21-11)
Draft Notice of Inquiry in REG 2014-10 and REG 2019-04 (Segregated 
Party Accounts)
Management and Administrative Matters

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer
Telephone: (202) 694-1220

    Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at 
(202) 694-1040 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e2d3b3d2c3b2a3f2c271e383b3d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bac9dfd9c8dfcedbc8c3fadcdfd994ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>, at least 72 hours prior to the 
meeting date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-02393 Filed 2-1-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael P. Gray, Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 29, 2009



/S/    MICHAEL P.
GRAYMichael P. GrayChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
AUSBON OSBORNE,

V.

THE 5TATE OF TEXAS

NO.

IN THE COURT OF

CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXaJ!!=PESVEDIN

SEP 16 2015

PRO SE MOTION REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE

AN ORIGINAL COPY OF THE

-:;P;ETiIT--E0-N^FQ"R-^'DvES:EWE^EO NA R Y- -,R E V IE U~

Abel Acosta, Cterf?

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

COMES NOW the Appellant in the above-styled and numbered cause and

respectfully moves this Honorable Court to grant leave to file an origi

nal copy only of the Petition for Discretionary Review and in support

thereof would shay to the Court the foiling:

1. The style and appeal number in the Amarillo Court of Appeals

is: NO. 07-13-00156-CR V. The State of Texas.

2. The Appellant moves that, pursuant to Rule 2, Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure, this Coiirt suspend Rule 9.3(b), Texas Rule of App

ellate Procedure, that requires the filing of eleven (11) copies of the

Petition for Discretionary Review with the Court.

3. The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request are

as follows: The Appellant is indigent and incarcerated and does not

have access to a photo copier. The Appellant is presently not repres

ented by counsel and intends to file a Pro Se Petition for Discretionary

Review by inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice system.

..T-h.e.-»A.p-pe.lJ..a-n-t-,,-A-t-j-s=b«o»n ^Osfao-r-n-e , t-;r»e-Sip«eEt-f ully thinks this Honorable

Courts kind assistance in regards to the above motion, and request in

the best interest of justice, the Court would consider granting this

Appellant's motion.

RESPECTFULLY submitted;

(name/date)
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Appellant respectfully request

that this Honorable Court grant leave to file an original copy only

of the Petition .for Discretionary Review with the Court.

Respectfully submitted

/t £ g-lJSr-lS

(Signature/Date)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The Appellant hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of

the foregoing Motion has been mailed to the Office of the Criminal

District Attorney for Tarrant County, Fort Worth, Texas, on the

day of /Tt-t&US-7" ,2015.

(name)

Ausbon Osborne

TDC0#1 85381 7

Hodge Unit

379 FM 2972 W

Rusk, TX 75785-3666

<9-2o-/t
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 27, 2015

Order 

Clerk

January 27, 2015

150446(31)

DELLA DOTSON,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 150446

v COA: 315411

Macomb CC: 2011-003427-NI

GARFIELD COURT ASSOCIATES, LLC, 

d/b/a GARFIELD COMMONS, and 

BROOKLINE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellants to extend the 

time for filing their reply in support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. 

The reply submitted on January 16, 2015, is accepted for filing.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136664 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, 

## Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices



## v SC: 136664 COA: 283835 Wayne CC: 07-007973-FH LUKISHA SABRINA PATTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 22, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0362 MASTERS GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC., Thi

rd - Party Plaint iff and Appellee, V. COMERICA BANK,

Thi rd - Party Defendant and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIAT OR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Lawrence E.**  **Henke,** whose name appears next on th e list of attorneys desiring appo int me nt a s mediators fo r Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time periods set fo rth in M.R .App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s August 5, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Jeffrey

R. Kuchel , Jane Derse Quasarano, James H. Goetz, David M. Wagner, Joseph J. Shannon, Timothy B. Strauch, Ward E. Taleff, Lawrence E. Henke



# Viy-.-6Am--f 08/05/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0362
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 496 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 496

To abolish the Board of Review of the Metropolitan Washington Airports 
                   Authority, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

              March 3 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

 Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Robb) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To abolish the Board of Review of the Metropolitan Washington Airports 
                   Authority, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ABOLITION OF BOARD OF REVIEW AND RELATED AUTHORITY.

    (a) Abolition of Board of Review.--Section 6007 of the Metropolitan 
Washington Airports Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 1783-379) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (f) and (h);
            (2) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f); and
            (3) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (g).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Relationship to and effect of other laws.--Section 
        6009(b) of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986 
        (100 Stat. 1783-384) is amended by striking ``or by reason of 
        the authority'' and all that follows through the end of the 
        subsection and inserting a period.
            (2) Separability.--Section 6011 of the Metropolitan 
        Washington Airports Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 1783-385) is amended 
        by striking ``Except as provided in section 6007(h), if'' and 
        inserting ``If''.
    (c) Protection of Certain Actions.--Actions taken by the Airports 
Authority and submitted to the Board of Review pursuant to section 
6007(f)(4) of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986 before 
April 1, 1995, shall remain in effect and shall not be set aside solely 
by reason of a judicial order invalidating certain functions of the 
Board of Review.
    (d) Amendment of Lease.--The Secretary of Transportation shall 
amend the lease entered into with the Airports Authority under section 
6005(a) of the Metropolitan Washington Airports Act of 1986 to secure 
the Airports Authority's consent to the amendments made by this Act.

SEC. 2. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS IN OTHER LAW.

    Any reference in any Federal law, Executive order, rule, 
regulation, or delegation of authority to the Board of Review of the 
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority or the provisions of law 
repealed under this Act is hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification
is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not deemed to be filed for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: November 7, 2008



/s/ Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.Chief Financial Officer
Order entered Febr uary 13 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 14
- 00945
- CR No. 05
- 14
- 00946
- CR
LADEREK KINTE REYNOL DS, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F09
- 58630
- Y , F 11
- 60044
- Y



### O RDER The reporter’s record was originally due in th ese appeal s on August 19, 2014. When the record was not filed by October 31, 2014, the Court ordered the trial court to make findings
reg arding the record. On December 2, 2014, this Court ordered Sharon Hazlewood, then official court reporter of the Criminal District Court No. 7, to file the complete reporter’s record by January 5, 2015 . When Ms. Hazlewood did not file the record by Janua ry 15 , 2015, we issued an order that she file the record by 4:00 p.m., January 2 6 , 2015. We further ordered that Ms. Hazlewood not sit as a court reporter until the record is filed in th e s e appeal s . To date, Ms. Hazlewood has neither filed the reporter’s record nor communicated with the Court regarding the status of this record. The appeal s cannot proceed until the reporter’s record is filed.Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding the following.

 Whether Sharon Hazlewood, former official court reporter of the Criminal District Court No. 7, has lost or destroyed the notes of the proceedings in this case.

 If the trial court finds that Sharon Hazlewood has not lost or destroyed the notes, the trial court shall next determine whethe r Ms. Hazlewood should be required to surrender her notes of the trial court proceedings in this case to the trial court for another court reporter to prepare the record.

 If the trial court determines that the notes should be surrendered, the trial court shall make a finding as to the name and contact information of the court reporter who will prepare and file the reporter’s record.

 Because the record is already six months overdue and Ms. Hazlewood has been fully non

- compliant with previous orders regardi ng the record, the Court will accept no finding that Sharon Hazlewood should be allowed to continue to work on the record absent a finding that Ms. Hazlewood has tendered a complete record, including all exhibits.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a re cord containing its written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of
this order. Ms. Hazlewood remains under the Court’s January 15, 2015 order that she not sit as a court reporter.
We D IRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Elizabeth Frizell, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 7; Sharon Hazlewood, former official court reporter, Criminal District Court No. 7; the Dallas County Auditor; and to counsel for all parties.
We ABATE the appeal s to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal s shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-20300

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROSMON ANDRE LIVING, also known as Gator

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-221-ALL

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rosmon Andre Living

presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States

v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce

Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-a-firearm statute, 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g) (2006). Appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and

the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 5, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ WEN CHIANN YEH, Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD , Respondent.

__________________________
2012

- 3216

__________________________ Petiti on for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. CH1221110433

- W

- 2.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________

O R D E R

The Merit Systems Protection Board move s for a 30

- day extension of time

, until April 1 , 201 3
, to file its pri ncipal brief

. Wen Yeh opposes.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 12-3216 Document: 23 Page: 1 Filed: 02/27/2013W EN YEH V

. M SPB 2

The motion i s granted

.

F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s 2 7 Case: 12-3216 Document: 23 Page: 2 Filed: 02/27/2013
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 22, 2017

s0315 

# Order

Clerk March 22, 2017

153912 & (53)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MI CHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153912

COA: 325857

Berrien CC: 2014

- 003481

- FC

JORDAN CONRAD JOHNSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file pro per supplemental

application is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 379 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 379

                For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 9 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Exon introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Richard W. Schaffert.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The limitations set forth in sections 6511 and 
6514(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to period of 
limitation on filing claim and on allowance of credits or refunds for 
tax overpayment) shall not apply to a claim filed by Richard W. 
Schaffert of Lincoln, Nebraska, for credit or refund of an overpayment 
of the individual Federal income tax Richard W. Schaffert paid for the 
taxable year 1983.
    (b) Deadline.--Subsection (a) shall apply only if Richard W. 
Schaffert submits a claim pursuant to such subsection within the 1-year 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GEORGE GILMORE,

Petitioner

v.

LAWRENCE P. MAHALLY, SUPERINTENDENT,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 195 EM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24th day of January , 201 7

, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , and the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the

Application for Appointment of Counsel are DENIED

.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00010

- CR

JOSEPH LUNA V. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 11CR3639

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

ap peal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED

. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 6, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

JOSE YANEZ-DOMINGUEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50483 

D.C. No. 3:16-cr-02317-DMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017**

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jose Yanez-Dominguez appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 2 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-50483 

Yanez-Dominguez contends that the district court improperly relied on his 

criminal history as a reason to deny the parties’ joint request for a fast-track 

departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1 and impose an above-Guidelines sentence. The 

court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Rosales-Gonzales, 801 F.3d 

1177, 1180 (9th Cir. 2015). The court properly considered Yanez-Dominguez’s 

criminal and immigration history, including his two previous illegal reentry 

offenses for which he received lengthy sentences. See id. at 1184. Moreover, the 

18-month sentence, two months above the high end of the guideline range, is 

substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and 

the totality of the circumstances. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 

(2007).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------



               Commodore Applied Technologies, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection  with the annual report of Commodore  Applied  Technologies,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on form  10-K for the year  ended  December  31,  2003,  James
DeAngelis  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of
his knowledge:

         (1)  The annual report fully complies with the  requirements of section
              13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
              all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of
              operations of the Company.

Date:    April 14, 2004


/s/ James M. DeAngelis
----------------------
James M. DeAngelis
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer