alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, February 6, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on February 8, 2024.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting will be a hybrid meeting).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Matters relating to internal personnel decisions, or internal rules and practices.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

* * * * *

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-02038 Filed 1-29-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
#### Frances MUNN, Appellant v. Marvin D. MUNN, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 22, 1956.

C. H. Bruce, John F. Coldiron, Frank K. Warnock, Greenup, for appellant.

Lovel H. Liles, Oscar Sammons, Green-up, for appellee.

WADDILL, Commissioner.

Mrs. Frances Munn has appealed from that part of the judgment entered in this divorce action which determined issues relating to the support of infant children, *561alimony, attorney’s fees, costs, and property rights arising- under KRS 403.060(2).. Although we refuse to review the Chancellor’s action regarding alimony and property rights, we observe that his disposition of these matters was justified under the proof. •

The Chancellor- found that both parties to this action have, since their marriage in 1932, been continuously engaged in violating our State and Federal laws relating to the possession and sale of intoxicating beverages. Also, the Chancellor found that ¡substantially all money and property they have acquired was derived from their unlawful activities. Moreover,' there was testimony that the parties manipulated their property with the intent of defrauding their creditors; ■ Since these findings 'are -supported by the record, it neces- - sarily follows- that the -subject matter of this - action is' infected with fraud and illegality. Under such circumstances we shall invoke the ancient doctrine that equity withholds its aid from those who transgress the law in and about a matter in which redress is sought. See, Strand Amusement Co. v. City of Owensboro, 242 Ky. 772, 47 S.W.2d 710; Honaker v. Honaker, 182 Ky. 38, 206 S.W. 12. Hence, we summarily confirm the judgment as it affects the property rights of the parties, and limit our review of the case to determining whether a proper allowance was made for the maintenance of their two infant children and whether the Chancellor correctly ■ ordered Mrs. Munn to pay her own costs and her attorney’s fee.

The' Chancellor ordered Mr. Munn to pay Mrs. Munn $80 a month for the children’s support. Under the record, this allowance appears to be adequate for their immediate needs. However, in the .event there is a change of conditions which warrants an increase of maintenance for these children, the Chancellor may revise his order to protect their welfare. KRS 403.070; Heltsley v. Heltsley, Ky., 242 S.W.2d 973.

The Chancellor found that Mrs. Munn had established her grounds for divorce. KRS 453.120 provides that in an action of this character the husband shall pay the costs of each party unless it appears that the wife is in fault and has ample estate to pay the costs. In view of the fact that the proof was insufficient to support a finding that Mrs. Munn was in fault within the contemplation of KRS 453.120, we think the Chancellor erred in not decreeing the cost of this action, including "a reasonable fee for Mrs. Munn’s counsel, against Mr. Munn.

The judgment is affirmed except wherein it ordered Mrs.. Munn' to pay her own costs and her attorney’s fee. In that respect the judgment is reversed, with directions to enter an order for Mr. Munn to pay all costs of actions, including a reasonable fee to Mrs. Munn’s attorney.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J. Craig, Chief Financial Officer of Accenture plc, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 24, 2011



/s/ Pamela J. CraigPamela J. CraigChief Financial Officer of Accenture plc, general partner of Accenture SCA (principal financial officer)
**EXHIBIT10.3**

** **

**NOTATION OF GUARANTEE**

** **

For value received, eachGuarantor (which term includes any successor Person under the Indenture) has,jointly and severally, unconditionally guaranteed, to the extent set forth inthe Indenture and subject to the provisions in the Indenture dated as ofFebruary 23, 2004 (the “*Indenture*”) among UbiquiTel OperatingCompany (the *“Company”*), UbiquiTel Inc., as guarantor, and The Bank ofNew  York, as trustee (the “*Trustee*”),(a) the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium and LiquidatedDamages, if any, and interest on, the Notes, whether at maturity, byacceleration, redemption or otherwise, the due and punctual payment of intereston overdue principal of and interest on the Notes, if any, if lawful, and the dueand punctual performance of all other obligations of the Company to the Holdersor the Trustee all in accordance with the terms of the Indenture and (b) incase of any extension of time of payment or renewal of any Notes or any of suchother obligations, that the same will be promptly paid in full when due orperformed in accordance with the terms of the extension or renewal, whether atstated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise. The obligations of the Guarantors to the Holders of Notes and to the Trusteepursuant to the Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set forth in Article10 of the Indenture and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for theprecise terms of the Guarantee.

 

Capitalized terms usedbut not defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Indenture.

 
|   | UBIQUITEL INC. |
|--------|----------------|
|   |           |
|   |           |
|   | By:            |   |
|   |           | Name: James J.  Volk |
|   |           | Title: Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

* *

In connection with theQuarterly Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB,as amended, for the quarter ended October 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnH. Jungbauer, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:   March 20, 2006 | By:                                                   | /s/ John H.  Jungbauer |   |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                         | John H.  Jungbauer                                    |
|                         | Vice  President, Finance and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2587
JERRY ODELL ADAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERTA BORDEN, in her official capacity; KEITH WALTERS, in his official capacity; THE SHELBY STAR, Defendants - Appellees, and BENNY MCINTYRE, in his o fficial capacity; RAMONA HAGNER, in her official capacity; PRESTON CHERKA, Lieutenant, in his official capacity; CITY OF SHELBY, Defendants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-97-210-4) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: April 28, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Odell Adams, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan E. Buchan, SMITH, HELMS, MULLISS & MOORE, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation to dismiss some, but not all, ofthe Defendants in Appellant's action alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress and violation of his constitutional rights. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction onlyover final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.35











Mr R J Hughes
                                  
               
                  
                  






21st December 2016






Dear Rhys,


Variation to your Notice Period in your Service Agreement


As you know, you entered into a service agreement with Interflora Holdings Limited (the “Company”)               on 8 February 2005 (the “Service Agreement”) under which you are now employed as the President             of Interflora British Unit. The Service Agreement sets out the terms and conditions of your employment and those terms and conditions have been varied by agreement on a number of occasions since 2005 by different variation letters.  


Your Service Agreement (and recent variation letters) provides for a notice period of 6 months on                         either side (as per your notice period in clause 2.1 of your Service Agreement and Schedule 1 of the Service Agreement).  The purpose of this variation letter is to increase the notice period to be given by the Company to you to 12 months’ notice (the notice period to be given by you to the Company                            remains as six months).  This reflects the very senior and important role that you play within the                      business.


This variation is to take effect from today, 21st December 2016.  Please could you sign both original copies of this letter to indicate your acceptance to the increase to your notice period.




Yours sincerely




/s/ Sian E H Fell


Sian E H Fell
Director Human Resources and Facilities
For and on behalf of
Interflora British Unit








I confirm that I have read and understood the terms of this letter and agree to the variation set out 
within it.






Signed.../s/ Rhys J Hughes............................................. Dated ...22/12/16...........................
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 06-0422

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF MELISSA CALHOON JONES 

# FILED ORDEAUL 1 3 2021

Bowen Greenw000 Clerk of Supreme Cour State of Montana Melissa Calhoon Jones has petitioned the Court to waive the three-year test requirement for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes ofJones' application for admission by motion to the State Bar ofMontana. By rule, applicants for admission by motion must provide evidence ofthe requisite score on an MPRE taken "within three years preceding the date ofthe application for admission." Rule IV.A.3,Rules ofAdmission. Jones passed the MPRE in 1996 when seeking admission to the practice oflaw in California,where Jones was admitted. Jones has also been admitted to the practice oflaw in the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland. The petition states Jones has "practiced law as a labor and employmentattorney for nearly 25 years,withoutany ethical or disciplinary issues in any of the jurisdictions where she is licensed." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofMelissa Calhoon Jonesto waive the three-year test requirement for the MPRE for purposes ofJones' current application for admission by motion to the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. The Clerk shall mail a copy ofthis order to Petitioner and to the Administrator of the Board ofBar Examiners at the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this W`• day ofJuly,2021.

ChiefJusti 07/13/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0422
----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28,      2008  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                               |                                                |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                     | PAPERWEIGHT      DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                                     |                               |                                                |
| Dated:  November      10, 2008 |                               |        /s/ Mark R. Richards                    |
|                                     | Name:                              | Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                                     | Title:                             | Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

October 19, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00757

- CR

Loribeth MARTINEZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 08

- 11761

- CR Honorable Camile G. Dubose, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The trial court imposed sentence on September 4 , 201 8 . Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to be filed by October 4 , 201 8

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a). On October 1 1 , 201 8

, Appellant filed a notice of appeal, and on October 1 8 , 201 8

, Appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal.
Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal is GRANTED; Appellant’s notice of appeal is deemed timely f iled. See id. R. 26.3.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of October, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.1**

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Theodore R. Maloney,certify that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”), fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of MediCor.

Date:November 2, 2006
|        | /s/ Theodore R. Maloney |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Theodore R. Maloney     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>



      In connection with the Annual Report of CEL-SCI Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Geert Kersten, the Chief
Executive and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.



December 10, 2010                   By:   /s/ Geert Kersten
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Geert Kersten, Chief Executive and
                                            Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     15,629,046
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 15,629,046
<CASH>                                         491,482
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 16,174,256
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                13,373
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                839,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       183,692
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,928,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   16,174,256
<PREMIUMS>                                     272,436
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            45,993
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             13,591
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 1,795
<BENEFITS>                                     124,717
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           122,777
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (75,770)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (28,258)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (47,512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (47,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.26)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 30,121
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            124,717
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              23,494
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             117,771
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               23,494
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                13,373
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

# **Co-Registrant(Commission File Number 000-30761):**

 

**UbiquiTel Inc.**

**One West Elm Street**

**Suite 400**

**Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428**

 

**Co-Registrant (Commission File Number 333-39950):**

 

**UbiquiTel Operating Company**

**One West Elm Street**

**Suite 400**

**Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428**

 

 

# **CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

## **PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel OperatingCompany on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, James J. Volk, Chief Financial Officer of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTelOperating Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company.

 
|   | UBIQUITEL  INC.              |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   |                         |
|   |                         |
|   | */s/ James J. Volk*          | * * |
|   | James  J. Volk               |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer     |
|   |                         |
|   |                         |
|   | UBIQUITEL  OPERATING COMPANY |
|   |                         |
|   |                         |
|   | */s/ James J. Volk*          | * * |
|   | James  J. Volk               |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer     |
|   |                         |
|   |                         |
|   | November  5, 2004            |

 

----