alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50477

(Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE LUIS ROSALES,

a/k/a JORGE ESTRADA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(90-CR-266)

January 25, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jorge Luis Rosales, a/k/a Jorge Estrada, argues that the district court ordered that his

sentence be served consecutively to his state sentence based on the district court’s mistaken

assumption that it was bound by the policy statements in Chapter 7 of the Sentencing Guidelines.

Estrada seeks to have the case remanded to the district court for resentencing.

There was no argument presented in the district court concerning whether the policy

statements were obligatory in imposing sentence, and Estrada failed to raise the issue after the

imposition of the consecutive sentence although the district court gave him the opportunity to do so.
2

Therefore, the issue must be reviewed for plain error. See United States v. Kroust, 66 F.3d 1420,

1433-34 (5th Cir. 1995) (a party must raise a claim of error in such a manner so that the district court

may correct itself, and avoid the need for appellate review).

Under Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b), this court may correct forfeited errors only when the appellant

shows the following factors: (1) there is an error, (2) that is clear or obvious, and (3) that affects his

substantialrights. United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5thCir. 1994) (en banc). If these

factors are established, the decision to correct the forfeited error is within the sound discretion of the

court, and the court will not exercise that discretion unless the error seriously affects the fairness,

integrity, or public reputation ofjudicial proceedings. United States v. Olano, 113 S. Ct. 1770, 1776-

79 (1993), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995).

We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of the sentencing hearing, and the

briefs, and have determined that the district court did not commit plain error in imposing a

consecutive sentence.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for applicable date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant Director for Enforcement, Compliance and Analysis, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://www.treasury.gov/​ofac*).                

## Notice of OFAC Actions

On February 2, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
      ( print page 8518)          ( print page 8519)    

Dated: February 2, 2024.

Bradley T. Smith,

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

[FR Doc. 2024-02497 Filed 2-6-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
**Norflurazon Focus Meeting**  **Contact Sheet 4/11/13**  **meeting with Syngenta**

Name Organization Email Harold Coble USDA Harold.coble@ars.usda.gov Khue Nguyen OPP/PRD Nguyen.khue@epa.gov Natalia Peranginangin Syngenta Natalia.peranginangin@syngenta.com Richard Brain Syngenta Richard.brain@syngenta.com Tracy White OPP/RD White.tracy@epa.gov Mark Corbin OPP/EFED Corbin.mark@epa.gov Brian Kiernan OPP/EFED Kiernan.brian@epa.gov Ibrahim Abdel

-Saheb OPP/EFED Abdel

-saheb.ibrahim@epa.gov Jihad Alsadek OPP BEAD Alsadek.jihad@epa.gov Ana Rivera

-Lupianez OPP/HED Rivera

- lupianez.ana@epa.gov William Donovan OPP/HED Donovan.william@epa.gov Sunil Ratnayake OPP/BEAD Ratnayake.sunil@epa.gov Jerry Wells Syngenta Jerry.wells@syngenta.com Jeff Perine Syngenta Jeff.perine@syngenta.com Jisu Bang Syngenta Jisu.bang@syngenta.com Les Glasgow Syngenta Les.glasgow@syngenta.com Dan Campbell Syngenta Dan.campbell@syngenta.com Neil Anderson OPP/PRD Anderson.neil@epa.gov Mike Metzger OPP/HED Metzger.michael@epa.gov Michael Goodis OPP/PRD Goodis.michael@epa.gov Tom Moriarty OPP/PRD Moriarty.thomas@epa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 441 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 75
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 441

                          [Report No. 104-53]

  To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian 
  Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 16 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

  Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Domenici) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian 
                                Affairs

                             April 18, 1995

    Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of April 6 
   (legislative day, April 5), 1995, by Mr. McCain, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian 
  Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS.

  Sections 409(e), 410(h), and 411(i) of the Indian Child Protection 
and Family Violence Prevention Act (25 U.S.C. 3208(e), 3209(h), and 
3210(i), respectively) are each amended by striking ``and 1995'' and 
inserting ``1995, 1996, and 1997''.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 75

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 441

                          [Report No. 104-53]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian 
  Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 18, 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB/A for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. Wilkniss,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


January 18, 2007                                   By: /s/ PETER F. WILKNISS
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Peter F. Wilkniss
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        Chief Accounting Officer
#### Ex parte Henry WILSON.

No. 36300.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 18, 1963.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 5,1964.

*893Victor R. Blaine, Houston, for appellant.

Frank Briscoe, Dist. Atty., Carl E. F. Dally, James I. Smith, Jr., and Frank Puckett, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

By writ of habeas corpus filed in the County Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, the appellant attacks as void the judgment of conviction for the offense of negligent collision as defined by Ordinance No. 41-39 of the City of Houston.

Appellant was convicted in the Corporation Court of the City of Houston under a complaint charging the offense of negligent collision and fined $25. Upon his appeal to the County Court at Law No. 1 he was again convicted and assessed a fine of $5. It is from confinement by virtue of a commitment issued under said judgment that appellant applied for a writ of habeas corpus. The writ was granted, and after a hearing the appellant was remanded to custody, and from such order he appeals.

It is contended that Subsection A of Ordinance No. 41-39 of the City of Houston, upon which this conviction rests, is void upon the grounds it defines the same offense as is defined in Art. 827a, Sec. 8, Subsec. 1(a), Vernon’s Ann.P.C., but prescribes a different punishment.

It is apparent that an essential element of the offense defined by the ordinance is a collision caused by the negligent operation of a motor vehicle in the manner prohibited by said ordinance.

Art. 827a, Sec. 8, Subsec. 1(a), V.A.P.C., regulates only the speed of motor vehicles on a public highway.

The foregoing ordinance and article are each applicable to a different set of facts. Therefore appellant’s contention cannot be sustained. Ex parte Dickson, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 117, 261 S.W.2d 709; Ex parte Mooney, 106 Tex.Cr.R. 156, 291 S.W. 246.

The ordinance not being in conflict with Sec. 8 of Art. 827a, V.A.P.C., or any other penal statute which has been called to our attention, the trial judge did not err in remanding appellant to custody.

The judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

MORRISON, Judge.

In our original opinion, we failed to point out that this prosecution was had prior to the repeal of Art. 827a, Sec. 8, Subsection (l)(a) Vernon’s Ann.P.C., and the enactment of Art. 6701d, Art. XIX, Sec. 166(b) Vernons Ann.Civ.St. However, we remain convinced of the soundness of our original opinion.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
#### J. W. LACY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27768.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 2, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is violation of the liquor law; the punishment, a fine of $500.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-20006

AIR BOB, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GE ENGINE SERVICES CORPORATE AVIATION, INC., doing business as Garrett Aviation Services, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas No. 4:03-CV-1854

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Air Bob, Inc., sued GE Engine Services Corporate Aviation, Inc., doing business as Garret Aviation Services, alleging faulty repair ofthe plaintiff’s airUnited States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-20006

2 craft. In the bench trial, the district court granted a defense motion for what the parties refer toas a “directed verdict,” concluding “that Air Bob has failed to present any evidence ofa duty owed by Garrett that it breached.” That order is correct, essentially for the reasons set forth in the memorandum and order entered November 6, 2006. After entry ofjudgment, the district court awarded costs to defendant as the prevailing party. Plaintiff appeals the award to the extent it includes the cost ofvideotaped depositions. Defendant properly acknowledged in oral argument that the law in this circuit is that such costs are not taxable. See, e.g., Migis v. PearleVision, 135 F.3d 1041, 1049 (5th Cir. 1998). Defendant challenges that caselawas erroneous, but we have no authority to overrule previous panel decisions. The award in this case is in error. The judgment granting a directed verdict is AFFIRMED. The order awarding costs is VACATED and REMANDED for recalculation in accordance with this opinion.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, I, Theodore R. Maloney, certify that:

 

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of MediCor.

 

Date: May 19, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Theodore R. Maloney |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Theodore R. Maloney     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE0 4360A147
BRIAN E. NAPP AND SHEILAH 

M. HORMAN,

Petitioners,

v.

OAKLEAF PLANTATION 

PROPERTY OWNERS 

ASSOCIATION, INC., A 

FLORIDA NOT-FOR-PROFIT 

CORPORATION, AND ORANGE 

PARK TRUST SERVICES, LLC 

AS TRUSTEE OF THE CLAY 

COUNTY LAND TRUST #08-04-

25-007868-011-09,

Respondents.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-1530

Opinion filed August 9, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari.

P. Campbell Ford and Alison A. Blake of Ford, Miller & Wainer, P.A., Jacksonville 

Beach, for Petitioners.

Zachary R. Roth of Ansbacher Law, Jacksonville, for Respondent Oakleaf Plantation 

Owners Association, Inc.

M. Scott Thomas and Cristine M. Russell of Rogers Towers, P.A., Jacksonville, for 

Respondent Orange Park Trust Services, LLC.

PER CURIAM.
2

DENIED.

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8690]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Review of 
PRAT and K99/R00 MOCSAC Applications. March 04, 2024, 10:30 a.m. to 
March 05, 2024, 06:30 p.m., National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892 
which was published in the Federal Register on January 19, 2024, FR. 
Doc. 2024-00950, 89 FR 3671.
    This notice is being amended to change the name of the panel from 
Review of PRAT and K99/R00 MOCSAC Applications to the Review of PRAT 
and K99/R00 MOSAIC Applications. The meeting date, time, and location 
will stay the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 2, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-02582 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Drexel
Burnham Lambert Real Estate Associates II 1998 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000725646
<NAME> DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES II
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             613
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          11,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          4,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,410
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,963
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,885
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.25<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the
best of his knowledge, (i) the foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed by Yadkin Valley Company (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                        |  |                                            
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|Date: December 29, 2005 |  | /s/ David S. Perry                         
|                        |  | David S. Perry, President and Treasurer    
|                        |  | (principal executive and financial officer)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: November 14, 2007 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.