2008 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 12-29-2008 

# Ja ckson v . U SA P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 07-4628

F o llow thi s and a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi ll a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e and ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2008 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a nova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " J a ck s on v . U SA" (2008). 2008 D e cisio n s . P ape r 39. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi ll anova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2008/39B L D - 121 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N o. 07- 4628

___________ G R A D Y J A C K S O N , J R ., A ppel l ant

v. UNI TE D ST ATE S OF AM ERI CA

____________________________________ O n A p p ea l from the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt f o r th e W e ste rn D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( D . C . C i vi l N o. 06- cv- 00154) D istric t Ju d g e : H o n o ra b le S e a n J. M c L a u g h lin

____________________________________ S u b mi t t e d f

o rP o s s i b l e Di s mi s s a l P u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U. S . C. § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B) o r S u m m a ry A c tio n P u rs u a n t to T h ir d C ir c u it L A R 2 7 .4 a n d I.O .P . 1 0 .6 J anuary30, 2008 B efor e: M C K E E , R E N D E L L and SM I T H , C i r cui tJ udges

( O pi ni on fi l ed D ece m ber29, 2008 )

_________ OP I NI ON

_________ P E R C UR I AM G ra d yJa c k so n , Jr. a p p e a ls th e D istric t C o u rt’s o rd e r g ra n tin g a p p e llee ’s m o tio n to d ism iss his co m p lai n t. T h e p roc ed u ral hist o ryo f th is case an d the d etail s o f Ja ck so n ’s cl ai m s ar e w el l know n t o t he part i es , s etfor t h i n t he D i s t r i ctC our t ’ s t hor ough opi ni on,I n A l i , a fe der al pr i s onerw ho had bee n t r ans ferr ed t o a new pr i s on al l eged that 1 several i t em s of prop ertyw ere m i ssi ng from his bag s. 2 and nee d notbe di s cus s ed atl ength. B r i efl y , J acks on fi l ed a c om pl ai ntundert he Feder al T or tC l ai m s A ctal l egi ng t hats ever al i t ems of hi s pr oper t yw entm i s s i ng w hen he w as tra n sf e rre d to th e S p e c ial H o u sin g U n it. T h e D istric t C o u rt g ra n ted a p p e llee ’s m o tio n to di s m i s s and dec l i ned t o exer ci s e j ur i s di ct i on overanynegl i gence cl ai m s ar i s i ng under s t at e l aw . J acks on fi l ed a t i m el ynot i ce of appea l , and w e have j ur i s di ct i on under28 U . S. C . § 1291. T he D i s t r i ctC our thel d t hatB ur eau of Pr i s ons offi cer s w er e “l aw enfor cement offi cer s ” under28 U . S. C . § 2680( c) . T hats ect i on pr ovi des an exc ept i on t o t he U ni t ed St at es ’ w ai verof s over ei gn i m m uni t yforcl ai m s ar i s i ng fr om t he det ent i on of pr oper t yby l aw enfor cementoffi cer s . T he Supr eme C our tr ece nt l yhel d t he s ame i n A l i v. Feder al B u rea u o f P ri so n s, N o . 0 6 -91 3 0 , — S . C t. — , 2 0 0 8 W L 1 6 9 3 5 9 (Jan . 2 2 , 2 0 0 8 ). 1 B ecause the U nit ed S t at es has no tw ai ved i t s soverei gn i m m un i t yfor Jackson’s cl ai m s, t he D i s t r i ctC our tdi d noterri n di s m i s s i ng J acks on’ s compl ai ntforl ack of s ubj ect - m at t er j ur i s di ct i on. Sum m aryact i on i s appr opr i at e i f ther e i s no s ubs t ant i al ques t i on pr es ent ed i n t he appea l . See Thi r d C i r cui tL A R 27. 4. Fort he above r eas ons , as w el l as t hos e s etfor t h by th e D istric t C o u rt, w e w ill su m m a rilya f f irm th e D istric t C o u rt’s o rd e r. S e e T h ird C irc u it I.O .P . 1 0 .6 . A p p e llee ’s m o tio n to sta yth e a p p e a l is d e n ied a s m o o t.