alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p130559.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0559

Focus Ready Draft 7/8/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ DDH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: Reichhold, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

Page 1

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 7
p130559.eng

 

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (06/28/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3B1T1

Health: 1-2 Inhalation

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 60 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 7
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 7
p130559.eng

to the same medium. Note: migration is negl per SAT and

incineration releases < 28,000 kg/site-day (acute) and

698,000 kg/site-yr (chronic).

Water or Incineration or Landfill

High End: 1.9E+0 kg/site-day over 170 days/yr from 1 site

or 3.3E+2 kg/yr

Water or Incineration or Landfill

Conservative: 8.8E-1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1

site

or 2.2E+2 kg/yr

Air

Output 2: 3.3E+0 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site

Landfill

Output 2: 3.0E+1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site

or 7.4E+3 kg/yr

RELEASE TOTAL

8.8E+3 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

 

 

Page 6

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 7
p130559.eng

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 7

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 7
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                         OF TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE



         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of CITGO Petroleum Corporation (the "Registrant"), does
hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



         The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002 of the Registrant fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



Dated: September 8, 2003



                                                /s/ Luis E. Marin
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Name:  Luis E. Marin
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.19





 


 



March 15, 2017


 


Mr. George A. Eldridge


64 Damien Road


Wellesley, MA 02481


 


Re:Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement


 


Dear George,


 


Reference is hereby made to that certain amended and restated
Employment Letter Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), dated as of October 1, 2014, between you and Proteon
Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used herein, but not otherwise defined, shall have the
meaning given to them in the Employment Agreement.


 


The parties to this letter agreement (this “Amendment”)
hereby agree to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below.


 


1.       Amendment.


 


(a)       The
definition of “Severance Payment” is hereby amended by deleting part (i) of the second paragraph of Section 8(b) in
its entirety and replacing it with the following:


 


“(i)
provided that no benefits are payable to you under a separate severance agreement as a result of such termination, an amount equal
to twelve (12) months of your Base Salary, at the rate in effect on the date of termination, plus your annual Bonus in respect
of any Calendar year that has been earned but not yet paid (for this purpose the Bonus earned for such calendar year shall be determined
by the Board in good faith and in the same manner applicable to executive officers of the Company, your “Earned and Unpaid
Bonus”) or, in the event Constructive Termination or a termination without Cause occurs within thirty (30) days prior
to or three hundred sixty-five (365) days following a Corporate Transaction, twelve (12) months of your Base Salary at the rate
in effect on the date of termination plus, only following a Corporation Transaction, an amount equal to your Pro-Rata Bonus plus
any Earned and Unpaid Bonus, less applicable withholdings and deductions, paid in a lump sum as provided below (the “Severance
Payment”);”


 


2.       Effective
Date. The effective date of this Amendment is March 16, 2017.


 





3.       General.
Except as expressly stated in this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged
and in full force and effect. Upon execution, this Amendment shall be made a part of the Agreement and shall be incorporated by
reference therein. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which, when taken together, shall be deemed to be one
and the same instrument. A facsimile or portable document format (“.pdf”) copy of this Amendment, including the signature
pages, will be deemed an original.


 





Page 1 of 2








    

     

    




If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of
our agreement, please sign this Amendment in the place indicated below.


 


Thank you.


 


Sincerely,


 


 





	/s/ Matthew P. Kowalsky	 
	Matthew P. Kowalsky	 
	Vice President, Legal and Secretary	 







 


 


 


I have read, understand and accept this Amendment to the Employment
Agreement.


 


 





	/s/ George A. Eldridge	 	March 15, 2017	 
	George A. Eldridge	 	Date	 






 


 




 


 


 


 


 


Page 2  of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,557,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               30,622,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (627,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  8,245,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            53,337,000
<PP&E>                                      12,570,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (8,467,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,302,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       32,121,000
<BONDS>                                        180,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,000,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,302,000
<SALES>                                     71,195,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            86,433,000
<CGS>                                       39,774,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               79,597,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (384,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (476,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             540,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,156,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               (4,152,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,308,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,308,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

HL/Inventory

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LANCE CONWAY WOOD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

KEITH YORDY, Ex-Deputy Warden at

Idaho State Correctional Institution (ISCI;

et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-35594

D.C. No. 1:07-cv-00350-EJL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Idaho state prisoner Lance Wood appeals pro se from the district court’s

order denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

FILED

DEC 14 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
HL/Inventory

action alleging that prison officials retaliated against him for exercising his right to

access the courts. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we

affirm.

We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is

whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive

relief. The Lands Council v. McNair, 537 F.3d 981, 986 (9th Cir. 2008); see Winter

v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 129 S. Ct. 365, 374 (2008) (listing factors

for district court to consider). We conclude the district court did not abuse its

discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order denying the preliminary

injunction.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, R.B. Harris,  President of Sales Strategies,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, that:


(1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the " Report") fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 ( 15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o
(d); and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:    September 22, 2003




                                 /s/ R. B. Harris
                                 ----------------
                                 R. B. Harris, President/Director
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DEVIN ERIC LAMM, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-617 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 2, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Mary Handsel, Judge. Devin Eric Lamm, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Melvin v. State, 645 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1994); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Waiter v. State, 965 So. 2d 861 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007); Coughlin v. State, 932 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (en banc); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

KELLY, MORRIS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Whittier Energy Corporation. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Bryce W. Rhodes, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, and Michael B. Young, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, each certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the Untied States Code, that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theExchange Act; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  August 16, 2004 | */s/ Bryce W. Rhodes*                              |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Bryce  W. Rhodes                                   |
|                    | President,  CEO and Director                       |
|                    |                                               |
|                    |                                               |
|                    | */s/ Michael B. Young*                             |   |
|                    | Michael  B. Young                                  |
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer, Treasurer and Controller |

 

1

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41088 Summary Calendar

C. ELIJAH MUHAMMAD, also known as Christopher Mitchell,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BUREAU OF PRISONS; E. CHANDLER, Warden;
K. TIMMS, Lieutenant; SHEFFREY S. WARD;

UP MCGOWAN; UP NYLEN; P. DUMAS,

Defendants-Appellees.

----------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CV-324

-----------------------------------------------------------

April 24, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

C. Elijah Muhammad, federal prisoner # 0271-088 who was formerly confined at the United

States Penit ent iary in Beaumont, Texas, appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his civil action

brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Names Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S.

388 (1971), for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. He argues that he exhausted his

administrative remedies by filing an administrative tort claim pursuant to 28 C.F.R. §§ 2671 et seq.

Inmates are required to exhaust available administrative remedies before filing a civil action. S ee 42

U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Wright v. Hollingsworth

, 260 F.3d 357, 358 (5th Cir. 2001). The Federal Bureau-2-

of Pri so ns’ administrative remedy procedures are separate from the procedure for filing an

administrative tort claim and are codified in 28 U.S.C. §§ 542.10, 542.13, 542 .14, and 542.15.

Muhammad has not shown that he exhausted his administrative remedies as required by § 1997e(a).

See Porter v. Nussle

,

___U.S. ___ (U.S. Feb. 26, 2002, No. 00-853), 2002 WL 261683 at *10.

Therefore, he has not shown that the district court erred in dismissing his action for failure to exhaust

available administrative remedies.

AFFIRMED.
Petitions for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

August 23, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NOS. 14-18-00192-CV and 14-18-00193-CV

IN RE FERNANDRAL HENNINGTON AND DESTINEE KEY, Relators 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

 507th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-05776 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The relators are Fernandral Hennington and Destinee Key. The underlying 

suit is a petition by the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (the 

Department) for protection of a child, for conservatorship, and for termination of 

relators’ parental rights. 
2 

On March 15, 2018, relators filed separate petitions for writ of mandamus in 

this court requesting relief against the presiding judge of the 507th District Court of 

Harris County. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017); see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In his petition Hennington asks this court to compel the judge to grant 

a special appearance and plea to the jurisdiction he filed in the trial court, seeking

dismissal of the action. In her petition Key asks this court to compel the judge to 

relinquish jurisdiction. Additionally, both relators assert that the associate judge 

abused his discretion by orally ordering them and their attorneys to appear in court 

every day until Hennington and the child are present in court.

On August 14, 2018, Key filed with this court a notice suggesting that this 

mandamus proceeding is now moot. The notice indicates that the Department has 

nonsuited its action pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 162 and that the trial 

court has dismissed the action without prejudice. We agree with Key that these facts 

render moot relators’ petitions for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we dismiss 

relators’ petitions for writ of mandamus as moot.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Jamison.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 217TH DISTRICT COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 30th

day of January, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JUSTIN LESLIE DURHAM, Appellant

NO. 12-14-00151-CR; Trial Court No. CR-29271

Opinion by James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the 

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court 

below be in all things affirmed, and that this decision be certified to the court below for 

observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 27th day of March, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 23



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

MeriStar Hospitality Corporation:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-121939, 333-60463, 333-60465 and 333-37888) on Form S-8 and the registration statement (No. 333-66229) on Form S-3 of our report dated March 15,
2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005 and the related financial statement schedule of real estate and accumulated depreciation, and our reports dated March 15, 2006, with respect to managements assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005
annual report on Form 10-K of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation.



|               
|---------------
|/s/    KPMG LLP
|KPMG LLP       
|               
|McLean, VA     
|March 15, 2006
S. 457

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to update references in the classification of children for purposes of United States immigration laws.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF CHILD.

Section 101(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(b)) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1)— (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘legitimate child’’

and inserting ‘‘child born in wedlock’’; and (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘an illegitimate

child’’ and inserting ‘‘a child born out of wedlock’’; and

(2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘an illegitimate child’’

and inserting ‘‘a child born out of wedlock’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5
<CIK>                           0001013554
<NAME>                          PARK BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,273
<SECURITIES>                                   108,506
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (500)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,436
<PP&E>                                           3,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,336)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 203,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,765
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   203,788
<SALES>                                         13,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,792
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,130
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02
        

</TABLE>
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 14-855C

(Filed: November 17, 2014)

ADVANCED GOVERNMENT 

SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

O R D E R

The court is in receipt of defendant’s notice of corrective action (ECF No. 28),

plaintiff’s opposition thereto (ECF No. 29), and defendant’s reply in support (ECF No. 

30). This court now ORDERS that the relief defendant seeks shall be GRANTED. 

Consequently, the briefing schedule shall be suspended and the hearing on the parties’

motion for judgment on the administrative record is cancelled. The parties shall file a 

joint status report advising the court of the progress of the government’s corrective action 

no later than January 12, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy B. Firestone 

NANCY B. FIRESTONE

Judge