```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 640 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 227

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 640

                          [Report No. 104-170]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 9, 1995

                       Reported with an amendment

                                                       Calendar No. 227
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 640

                          [Report No. 104-170]

 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 28 (legislative day, March 27), 1995

 Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Reid, Mr. Bond, Mr. Graham, 
and Mr. McConnell) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
     and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

                            November 9, 1995

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, with an amendment
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
 projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

<DELETED>SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water 
Resources Development Act of 1995''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act 
is as follows:</DELETED>

<DELETED>Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
<DELETED>Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.
               <DELETED>TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

<DELETED>Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
<DELETED>Sec. 102. Project modifications.
<DELETED>Sec. 103. Project deauthorizations.
<DELETED>Sec. 104. Studies.
             <DELETED>TITLE II--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

<DELETED>Sec. 201. Morgan Point, Arkansas.
<DELETED>Sec. 202. White River Basin Lakes, Arkansas and Missouri.
<DELETED>Sec. 203. Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat restoration, 
                            California.
<DELETED>Sec. 204. Central and southern Florida.
<DELETED>Sec. 205. West Palm Beach, Florida.
<DELETED>Sec. 206. Periodic maintenance dredging for Greenville Inner 
                            Harbor Channel, Mississippi.
<DELETED>Sec. 207. Sardis Lake, Mississippi.
<DELETED>Sec. 208. Libby Dam, Montana.
<DELETED>Sec. 209. Small flood control project, Malta, Montana.
<DELETED>Sec. 210. Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey.
<DELETED>Sec. 211. Fire Island Inlet, New York.
<DELETED>Sec. 212. Wister Lake project, LeFlore County, Oklahoma.
<DELETED>Sec. 213. Abandoned and wrecked barge removal, Rhode Island.
<DELETED>Sec. 214. Providence River and Harbor, Rhode Island.
<DELETED>Sec. 215. Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
<DELETED>Sec. 216. Virginia Beach, Virginia.
                 <DELETED>TITLE III--GENERAL PROVISIONS

<DELETED>Sec. 301. Cost-sharing for environmental projects.
<DELETED>Sec. 302. Collaborative research and development.
<DELETED>Sec. 303. National inventory of dams.
<DELETED>Sec. 304. Hydroelectric power project uprating.
<DELETED>Sec. 305. Federal lump-sum payments for Federal operation and 
                            maintenance costs.
<DELETED>Sec. 306. Cost-sharing for removal of existing project 
                            features.
<DELETED>Sec. 307. Termination of technical advisory committee.
<DELETED>Sec. 308. Conditions for project deauthorizations.
<DELETED>Sec. 309. Participation in international engineering and 
                            scientific conferences.
<DELETED>Sec. 310. Research and development in support of Army civil 
                            works program.
<DELETED>Sec. 311. Interagency and international support authority.
<DELETED>Sec. 312. Expansion of section 1135 program.
<DELETED>Sec. 313. Environmental dredging.
<DELETED>Sec. 314. Feasibility studies.
<DELETED>Sec. 315. Obstruction removal requirement.
<DELETED>Sec. 316. Levee owners manual.
<DELETED>Sec. 317. Risk-based analysis methodology.
<DELETED>Sec. 318. Sediments decontamination technology.
<DELETED>Sec. 319. Melaleuca tree.
<DELETED>Sec. 320. Faulkner Island, Connecticut.
<DELETED>Sec. 321. Designation of lock and dam at the Red River 
                            Waterway, Louisiana.
<DELETED>Sec. 322. Jennings Randolph access road, Garrett County, 
                            Maryland.
<DELETED>Sec. 323. New York State canal system.
<DELETED>Sec. 324. Quonset Point-Davisville, Rhode Island.
<DELETED>Sec. 325. Capital improvements for the Washington Aqueduct.
<DELETED>Sec. 326. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and 
                            protection program.
<DELETED>Sec. 327. Technical corrections.

<DELETED>SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
the Army.</DELETED>

          <DELETED>TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the 
following projects for water resources development and conservation and 
other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, recommended in the respective reports designated in this 
section:</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) Marin county shoreline, san rafael canal, 
        california.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
        reduction, Marin County Shoreline, San Rafael Canal, 
        California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated January 28, 
        1994, at a total cost of $27,200,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $17,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $9,500,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) San lorenzo river, california.--The project 
        for flood control, San Lorenzo River, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $16,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,100,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,000,000 and the habitat 
        restoration, at a total cost of $4,050,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $3,040,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,010,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) Santa barbara harbor, santa barbara county, 
        california.--The project for navigation, Santa Barbara Harbor, 
        Santa Barbara, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated April 26, 1994, at a total cost of $5,720,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $4,580,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $1,140,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (4) Palm valley bridge replacement, st. johns 
        county, florida.--The project for navigation, Palm Valley 
        Bridge, County Road 210, over the Atlantic Intracoastal 
        Waterway in St. Johns County, Florida: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total Federal cost of 
        $15,312,000. As a condition of receipt of Federal funds, St. 
        Johns County shall assume full ownership of the replacement 
        bridge, including all associated operation, maintenance, 
        repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (5) Illinois shoreline erosion, interim iii, 
        wilmette to illinois and indiana state line.--The project for 
        storm damage reduction and shoreline erosion protection from 
        Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois and Indiana State line: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 14, 1994, at a 
        total cost of $197,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $106,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $91,000,000, 
        and the breakwater near the South Water Filtration Plant, a 
        separable element of the project at a total cost of $9,027,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $5,868,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,159,000. The operation, maintenance, 
        repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project after 
        construction shall be the responsibility of the non-Federal 
        interests.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (6) Kentucky lock addition, kentucky.--The project 
        for navigation, Kentucky Lock Addition, Kentucky: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated June 1, 1992, at a total cost of 
        $467,000,000. The construction costs of the project shall be 
        paid--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) 50 percent from amounts appropriated 
                from the general fund of the Treasury; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) 50 percent from amounts appropriated 
                from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by 
                section 9506 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
                1986.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (7) Wolf creek hydropower, cumberland river, 
        kentucky.--The project for hydropower, Wolf Creek Dam and Lake 
        Cumberland, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
        June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $50,230,000. Funds derived by 
        the Tennessee Valley Authority from the power program of the 
        Authority and funds derived from any private or public entity 
        designated by the Southeastern Power Administration may be used 
        for all or part of any cost-sharing requirements for the 
        project.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (8) Stabilization of natchez bluffs, 
        mississippi.--The project for bluff stabilization, Natchez 
        Bluffs, Natchez, Mississippi: Natchez Bluffs Study, dated 
        September 1985, Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement I, dated June 
        1990, and Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement II, dated December 
        1993, in the portions of the bluffs described in the reports 
        designated in this paragraph as Clifton Avenue, area 3; Bluff 
        above Silver Street, area 6; Bluff above Natchez Under-the-
        Hill, area 7; and Madison Street to State Street, area 4, at a 
        total cost of $17,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $12,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $4,300,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (9) Wood river at grand island, nebraska.--The 
        project for flood control, Wood River at Grand Island, 
        Nebraska: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 3, 1994, 
        at a total cost of $10,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
        of $5,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $5,250,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (10) Wilmington harbor, cape fear-northeast cape 
        fear rivers, north carolina.--The project for navigation, 
        Wilmington Harbor, Cape Fear-Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, North 
        Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 
        1994, at a total cost of $23,290,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $16,955,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $6,335,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (11) Duck creek, ohio.--The project for flood 
        control, Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated July 28, 1994, at a total cost of $15,408,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $11,556,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,852,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (12) Pond creek, ohio.--The project for flood 
        control, Pond Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $16,865,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $11,243,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $5,622,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (13) Coos bay, oregon.--The project for 
        navigation, Coos Bay, Oregon: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $14,541,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $10,777,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $3,764,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (14) Big sioux river and skunk creek at sioux 
        falls, south dakota.--The project for flood control, Big Sioux 
        River and Skunk Creek at Sioux Falls, South Dakota: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $31,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $23,600,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,000,000.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (15) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge 
        replacement at great bridge, chesapeake, virginia.--The project 
        for navigation at Great Bridge, Virginia Highway 168, over the 
        Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Chesapeake, Virginia: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 1, 1994, at a total cost 
        of $23,680,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,341,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,339,000. The city of 
        Chesapeake shall assume full ownership of the replacement 
        bridge, including all associated operation, maintenance, 
        repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (16) Marmet lock replacement, kanawha river, west 
        virginia.--The project for navigation, Marmet Lock Replacement, 
        Marmet Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, West Virginia: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $267,900,000. The construction costs of the project shall be 
        paid--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) 50 percent from amounts appropriated 
                from the general fund of the Treasury; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) 50 percent from amounts appropriated 
                from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by 
                section 9506 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
                1986.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 102. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Oakland Harbor, California.--The projects for 
navigation, Oakland Outer Harbor, California, and Oakland Inner Harbor, 
California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4092), are 
modified to combine the 2 projects into 1 project, to be designated as 
the Oakland Harbor, California, project. The Oakland Harbor, 
California, project shall be carried out by the Secretary substantially 
in accordance with the plans and subject to the conditions recommended 
in the reports designated for the projects in the section, except that 
the non-Federal share of project cost and any available credits toward 
the non-Federal share shall be calculated on the basis of the total 
cost of the combined project. The total cost of the combined project is 
$102,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $64,120,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $38,480,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) North Branch of Chicago River, Illinois.--The project 
for flood control for the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project substantially in accordance with the 
post authorization change report for the project dated March 1994, at a 
total cost of $34,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$20,774,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,026,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (c) Arkansas City, Kansas.--The project for flood control, 
Arkansas City, Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4116), 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report 
for the project dated June 1994, at a total cost of $35,700,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $26,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $9,100,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (d) Halstead, Kansas.--The project for flood control, 
Halstead, Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4116), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report 
for the project dated March 1993, at a total cost of $11,100,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $8,325,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $2,775,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (e) Baptiste Collette Bayou, Louisiana.--The project for 
navigation, Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, Louisiana, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82 
Stat. 731), is modified to provide for the extension of the 16-foot 
deep (mean low gulf) by 250-foot wide Baptiste Collette Bayou entrance 
channel to approximately mile 8 of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet 
navigation channel at a total estimated Federal cost of $80,000, 
including $4,000 for surveys and $76,000 for Coast Guard aids to 
navigation.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (f) Cape Girardeau, Missouri.--The project for flood 
control, Cape Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan Area, Missouri, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4118-4119), is modified to authorize 
the Secretary to carry out the project, including the implementation of 
nonstructural measures, at a total cost of $44,700,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $32,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $12,100,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (g) Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear River, North 
Carolina.--The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape 
Fear River, North Carolina, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4095) 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the general design memorandum for the 
project dated April 1990 and the general design memorandum supplement 
for the project dated February 1994, at a total cost of $50,921,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $25,128,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $25,793,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (h) Saw Mill Run, Pennsylvania.--The project for flood 
control, Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
662; 100 Stat. 4124), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry 
out the project substantially in accordance with the post authorization 
change and general reevaluation report for the project, dated April 
1994, at a total cost of $12,496,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$9,372,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,124,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (i) India Point Bridge, Seekonk River, Providence, Rhode 
Island.--The project for the removal and demolition of the India Point 
Railroad Bridge, Seekonk River, Rhode Island, authorized by section 
1166(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
662; 100 Stat. 4258), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
demolish and remove the center span of the bridge, at a total cost of 
$1,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $650,000, and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $650,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (j) Upper Jordan River, Utah.--The project for flood 
control, Upper Jordan River, Utah, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640; 104 
Stat. 4610), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the 
project substantially in accordance with the general design memorandum 
for the project dated March 1994, and the post authorization change 
report for the project dated April 1994, at a total cost of 
$12,370,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,220,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $4,150,000.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 103. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) Anchorage area.--The portion of the project 
        for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (Public Law 85-
        500; 72 Stat. 297), consisting of a 2-acre anchorage area with 
        a depth of 6 feet at the head of Johnsons River between the 
        Federal channel and Hollisters Dam, is deauthorized.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Johnsons river channel.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Johnsons River Channel, Bridgeport 
        Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act 
        entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
        preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and 
        for other purposes'', approved July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 634, 
        chapter 595), that is northerly of a line across the Federal 
        channel the coordinates of which are north 123318.35, east 
        486301.68, and north 123257.15, east 486380.77, is 
        deauthorized.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Southport Harbor, Connecticut.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The following portions of the 
        project for navigation, Southport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act 
        authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of 
        certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
        purposes'', approved August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 Stat. 
        1029), are deauthorized:</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) The 6-foot deep anchorage located at 
                the head of the project.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) The portion of the 9-foot deep channel 
                beginning at a bend in the channel the coordinates of 
                which are north 109131.16, east 452653.32, running 
                thence in a northeasterly direction about 943.01 feet 
                to a point the coordinates of which are north 
                109635.22, east 453450.31, running thence in a 
                southeasterly direction about 22.66 feet to a point the 
                coordinates of which are north 109617.15, east 
                453463.98, running thence in a southwesterly direction 
                about 945.18 feet to the point of beginning.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Remainder.--The portion of the project 
        referred to in paragraph (1) that is remaining after the 
        deauthorization made by the paragraph and that is northerly of 
        a line the coordinates of which are north 108699.15, east 
        452768.36, and north 108655.66, east 452858.73, is redesignated 
        as an anchorage.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (c) East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--The following portion of 
the navigation project for East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by 
the first section of the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 631, chapter 
382) (commonly referred to as the ``River and Harbor Act of 1910''), 
containing approximately 1.15 acres and described in accordance with 
the Maine State Coordinate System, East Zone, is 
deauthorized:</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    Beginning at a point noted as point number 6 and 
        shown as having plan coordinates of North 9, 722, East 9, 909 
        on the plan entitled, ``East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, 
        examination, 8-foot area'', and dated August 9, 1955, Drawing 
        Number F1251 D-6-2, said point having Maine State Coordinate 
        System, East Zone coordinates of Northing 74514, Easting 
        698381; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    Thence, North 58 degrees, 12 minutes, 30 seconds 
        East a distance of 120.9 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    Thence, South 72 degrees, 21 minutes, 50 seconds 
        East a distance of 106.2 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    Thence, South 32 degrees, 04 minutes, 55 seconds 
        East a distance of 218.9 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    Thence, South 61 degrees, 29 minutes, 40 seconds 
        West a distance of 148.9 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    Thence, North 35 degrees, 14 minutes, 12 seconds 
        West a distance of 87.5 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    Thence, North 78 degrees, 30 minutes, 58 seconds 
        West a distance of 68.4 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    Thence, North 27 degrees, 11 minutes, 39 seconds 
        West a distance of 157.3 feet to the point of 
        beginning.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (d) Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.--
The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode 
Island, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 
(Public Law 90-483; 82 Stat. 731), is modified to provide that 
alteration of the drawspan of the Brightman Street Bridge to provide a 
channel width of 300 feet shall not be required after the date of 
enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (e) Oswegatchie River, Ogdensburg, New York.--The portion 
of the Federal channel in the Oswegatchie River in Ogdensburg, New 
York, from the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 bridge, upstream 
to the northernmost alignment of the Lake Street bridge, is 
deauthorized.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (f) Kickapoo River, Wisconsin.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) Project modification.--The project for flood 
        control and allied purposes, Kickapoo River, Wisconsin, 
        authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 
        (Public Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1190), as modified by section 814 
        of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
        662; 100 Stat. 4169), is further modified as provided by this 
        subsection.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Transfer of property.--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) In general.--Subject to the 
                requirements of this paragraph, the Secretary shall 
                transfer to the State of Wisconsin, without 
                consideration, all right, title, and interest of the 
                United States in and to the lands described in 
                subparagraph (B), including all works, structures, and 
                other improvements on the lands.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) Land description.--The lands to be 
                transferred pursuant to subparagraph (A) are the 
                approximately 8,569 acres of land associated with the 
                LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of the project referred to 
                in paragraph (1) in Vernon County, Wisconsin, in the 
                following sections:</DELETED>
                        <DELETED>    (i) Section 31, Township 14 North, 
                        Range 1 West of the 4th Principal 
                        Meridian.</DELETED>
                        <DELETED>    (ii) Sections 2 through 11, and 
                        16, 17, 20, and 21, Township 13 North, Range 2 
                        West of the 4th Principal Meridian.</DELETED>
                        <DELETED>    (iii) Sections 15, 16, 21 through 
                        24, 26, 27, 31, and 33 through 36, Township 14 
                        North, Range 2 West of the 4th Principal 
                        Meridian.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (C) Terms and conditions.--The transfer 
                under subparagraph (A) shall be made on the condition 
                that the State of Wisconsin enters into a written 
                agreement with the Secretary to hold the United States 
                harmless from all claims arising from or through the 
                operation of the lands and improvements subject to the 
                transfer.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (D) Deadlines.--Not later than July 1, 
                1995, the Secretary shall transmit to the State of 
                Wisconsin an offer to make the transfer under this 
                paragraph. The offer shall provide for the transfer to 
                be made in the period beginning on November 1, 1995, 
                and ending on December 31, 1995.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (E) Deauthorization.--The LaFarge Dam and 
                Lake portion of the project referred to in paragraph 
                (1) is not authorized after the date of the transfer 
                under this paragraph.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (F) Interim management and maintenance.--
                The Secretary shall continue to manage and maintain the 
                LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of project referred to in 
                paragraph (1) until the date of the transfer under this 
                paragraph.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 104. STUDIES.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California.--Not 
later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) conduct a study of the advisability of 
        modifying, for the purpose of flood control pursuant to section 
        205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Lake 
        Elsinore, Riverside County, California, flood control project, 
        for water conservation storage up to an elevation of 1,249 feet 
        above mean sea level; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) report to Congress on the study, including 
        making recommendations concerning the advisability of so 
        modifying the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Long Beach, California.--The Secretary shall review 
the feasibility of navigation improvements at Long Beach Harbor, 
California, including widening and deepening of the navigation channel, 
as provided for in section 201(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4091). The Secretary shall 
complete the report not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (c) Murrieta Creek, Riverside County, California.--The 
Secretary shall review the completed feasibility study of the Riverside 
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, including 
identified alternatives, concerning Murrieta Creek from Temecula to 
Wildomar, Riverside County, California, to determine the Federal 
interest in participating in a project for flood control.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (d) Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration, 
California.--The Secretary shall study the feasibility of fish and 
wildlife habitat improvement measures identified for further study by 
the Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration Investigation 
Reconnaissance Report.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (e) West Dade, Florida.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in using the 
West Dade, Florida, reuse facility to increase the supply of surface 
water to the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife 
habitat.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (f) Ohio River Greenway, Indiana.--The Secretary shall 
conduct a study to determine the feasibility of the greenway project 
along the Ohio River in Jeffersonville, Clarksville, and New Albany, 
Indiana, as described in the plan entitled ``Conceptual Master Plan: 
Falls of the Ohio River Greenway Corridor'', as prepared by the Army 
Corps of Engineers in 1994.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (g) White River, Indiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
study to determine the feasibility of riverfront modifications as 
described in the report entitled ``Indianapolis, Indiana, White River 
Central Waterfront Reconnaissance Report'', dated October 
1993.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (h) Bayou Blanc, Crowley, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall 
conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in the 
construction of a bulkhead system, consisting of either steel sheet 
piling with tiebacks or concrete, along the embankment of Bayou Blanc, 
Crowley, Louisiana, in order to alleviate slope failures and erosion 
problems in a cost-effective manner.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (i) Hackberry Industrial Ship Channel Park, Louisiana.--
The Secretary shall incorporate the area of Hackberry, Louisiana, as 
part of the overall study of the Lake Charles ship channel, bypass 
channel, and general anchorage area in Louisiana, to explore the 
possibility of constructing additional anchorage areas.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (j) Lower Platte River, Nebraska.--The Secretary shall 
conduct a reconnaissance study of the Lower Platte River to determine 
the Federal interest in flood control and related water resources 
development in the study area. The Secretary shall consider 
nonstructural and structural measures for the management of the 
floodplain.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (k) City of North Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.--The 
Secretary shall conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal 
interest in channel improvements in channel A of the North Las Vegas 
Wash in the city of North Las Vegas, Nevada, for the purpose of flood 
control.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (l) Lower Las Vegas Wash Wetlands, Clark County, Nevada.--
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of the 
restoration of wetlands in the Lower Las Vegas Wash, Nevada, for the 
purposes of erosion control and environmental restoration.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (m) Northern Nevada.--The Secretary shall conduct 
reconnaissance studies, in the State of Nevada, of--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) the Humboldt River, and the tributaries and 
        outlets of the river;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) the Truckee River, and the tributaries and 
        outlets of the river;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) the Carson River, and the tributaries and 
        outlets of the river; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (4) the Walker River, and the tributaries and 
        outlets of the river;</DELETED>
<DELETED>in order to determine the Federal interest in flood control, 
environmental restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife, 
recreation, water conservation, water quality, and toxic and 
radioactive waste.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (n) Buffalo Harbor, New York.--The Secretary shall 
determine the feasibility of excavating the inner harbor and 
constructing the associated bulkheads in Buffalo Harbor, New 
York.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (o) Coeymans, New York.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in reopening the 
secondary channel of the Hudson River in the town of Coeymans, New 
York, which has been narrowed by silt as a result of the construction 
of Coeymans middle dike by the Army Corps of Engineers.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (p) Flushing Bay, New York.--The Secretary shall determine 
the feasibility of dredging the area of Flushing Bay, New York, 
directly surrounding the earthen dike to--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) restore water depths to pre-1963 
        levels;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) improve the water quality;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) restore tidal patterns of the bay through the 
        removal of mudflats; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (4) partially remove a portion of the dike for use 
        as fill for a runway extension at LaGuardia Airport.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (q) Shinnecock Inlet, New York.--Not later than 2 years 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall conduct a 
reconnaissance study in Shinnecock Inlet, New York, to determine the 
Federal interest in constructing a sand bypass system, or other 
appropriate alternative, for the purposes of allowing sand to flow in 
the natural east-to-west pattern of the sand and preventing the further 
erosion of the beaches west of the inlet and the shoaling of the 
inlet.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (r) Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, New York and 
New Jersey.--The Secretary shall continue engineering and design in 
order to complete the navigation project at Kill Van Kull and Newark 
Bay Channels, New York and New Jersey, authorized to be constructed in 
the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 99-88; 99 Stat. 
313), and section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4095), described in the general design 
memorandum for the project, and approved in the Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated December 14, 1981.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (s) Columbia Slough, Oregon.--Not later than 2 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete a 
feasibility study for the ecosystem restoration project at Columbia 
Slough, Oregon, as reported in the August 1993 Revised Reconnaissance 
Study. The study shall be a demonstration study done in coordination 
with the Environmental Protection Agency.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (t) Dallas Floodway Extension, Texas.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of 
        the flood control project for Dallas Floodway Extension, 
        Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of the Flood Control 
        Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 1091), for the purpose 
        of determining the feasibility of providing additional flood 
        protection to the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant and the 
        area known as Rochester Park.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Report.--The results of the study conducted 
        under paragraph (1) shall be included in the report presenting 
        the results of the ongoing reevaluation study of the authorized 
        project.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (u) Ashley Creek, Utah.--The Secretary is authorized to 
study the feasibility of undertaking a project for fish and wildlife 
restoration at Ashley Creek, near Vernal, Utah.</DELETED>

        <DELETED>TITLE II--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 201. MORGAN POINT, ARKANSAS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Secretary shall accept as in-kind contributions for 
the project at Morgan Point, Arkansas--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) the items described as fish and wildlife 
        facilities and land in the Morgan Point Broadway Closure 
        Structure modification report for the project, dated February 
        1994; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) fish stocking activities carried out by the 
        non-Federal interests for the project.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 202. WHITE RIVER BASIN LAKES, ARKANSAS AND 
              MISSOURI.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The project for flood control and power generation at 
White River Basin Lakes, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 4 
of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (commonly referred to as the ``Flood 
Control Act of 1938'') (52 Stat. 1218), shall include recreation and 
fish and wildlife mitigation as purposes of the project, to the extent 
that the purposes do not adversely impact flood control, power 
generation, or other authorized purposes of the project.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 203. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION, 
              CALIFORNIA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Secretary shall carry out, in accordance with section 
1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a(b)), the construction of a turbine bypass at Pine Flat Dam, Kings 
River, California.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 204. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The project for Central and Southern Florida, authorized 
by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82 
Stat. 740), is modified, subject to the availability of appropriations, 
to authorize the Secretary to implement the recommended plan of 
improvement contained in a report entitled ``Central and Southern 
Florida Project, Final Integrated General Reevaluation Report and 
Environmental Impact Statement, Canal 111 (C-111), South Dade County, 
Florida'', dated May 1994 (including acquisition of such portions of 
the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project), at 
a total cost of $121,000,000. The Federal share of the cost of 
implementing the plan of improvement shall be 50 percent. The Secretary 
of the Interior shall pay 25 percent of the cost of acquiring such 
portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the 
project, which amount shall be included in the Federal share. The non-
Federal share of the operation and maintenance costs of the 
improvements undertaken pursuant to this section shall be 100 percent, 
except that the Federal Government shall reimburse the non-Federal 
interest in an amount equal to 60 percent of the costs of operating and 
maintaining pump stations that pump water into Taylor Slough in 
Everglades National Park.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 205. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The project for flood protection of West Palm Beach, 
Florida (C-51), authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
1962 (Public Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1183), is modified to provide for the 
construction of an enlarged stormwater detention area, Storm Water 
Treatment Area 1 East, generally in accordance with the plan of 
improvements described in the February 15, 1994, report entitled 
``Everglades Protection Project, Palm Beach County, Florida, Conceptual 
Design'', prepared by Burns and McDonnell, and as further described in 
detailed design documents to be approved by the Secretary. The 
additional work authorized by this section shall be accomplished at 
full Federal cost in recognition of the water supply benefits accruing 
to the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge and the Everglades National 
Park and in recognition of the statement in support of the Everglades 
restoration effort set forth in the document signed by the Secretary of 
the Interior and the Secretary of the Army in July 1993. Operation and 
maintenance of the stormwater detention area shall be consistent with 
regulations prescribed by the Secretary for the Central and Southern 
Florida project, with all costs of the operation and maintenance work 
borne by non-Federal interests.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 206. PERIODIC MAINTENANCE DREDGING FOR GREENVILLE INNER 
              HARBOR CHANNEL, MISSISSIPPI.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Greenville Inner Harbor Channel, Mississippi, is 
deemed to be a portion of the navigable waters of the United States, 
and shall be included among the navigable waters for which the Army 
Corps of Engineers maintains a 10-foot navigable channel. The navigable 
channel for the Greenville Inner Harbor Channel shall be maintained in 
a manner that is consistent with the navigable channel to the 
Greenville Harbor and the portion of the Mississippi River adjacent to 
the Greenville Harbor that is maintained by the Army Corps of 
Engineers, as in existence on the date of enactment of this 
Act.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 207. SARDIS LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Secretary shall work cooperatively with the State of 
Mississippi and the city of Sardis to the maximum extent practicable in 
the management of existing and proposed leases of land consistent with 
the master tourism and recreational plan for the economic development 
of the Sardis Lake area prepared by the city.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 208. LIBBY DAM, MONTANA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--In accordance with section 103(c)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)(1)), the 
Secretary shall--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) complete the construction and installation of 
        generating units 6 through 8 at Libby Dam, Montana; 
        and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) remove the partially constructed haul bridge 
        over the Kootenai River, Montana.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $16,000,000, to remain 
available until expended.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 209. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, MALTA, 
              MONTANA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary is authorized to expend such Federal funds as are 
necessary to complete the small flood control project begun at Malta, 
Montana, pursuant to section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s).</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 210. CLIFFWOOD BEACH, NEW JERSEY.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law or the status of the project authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1962 (Public Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1180) for hurricane-
flood protection and beach erosion control on Raritan Bay and Sandy 
Hook Bay, New Jersey, the Secretary shall undertake a project to 
provide periodic beach nourishment for Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey, for 
a 50-year period beginning on the date of execution of a project 
cooperation agreement by the Secretary and an appropriate non-Federal 
interest.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project authorized by this section shall be 35 
percent.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 211. FIRE ISLAND INLET, NEW YORK.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    For the purpose of replenishing the beach, the Secretary 
shall place sand dredged from the Fire Island Inlet on the shoreline 
between Gilgo State Park and Tobay Beach to protect Ocean Parkway along 
the Atlantic Ocean shoreline in Suffolk County, New York.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 212. WISTER LAKE PROJECT, LEFLORE COUNTY, 
              OKLAHOMA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Secretary shall maintain a minimum conservation pool 
level of 478 feet at the Wister Lake project in LeFlore County, 
Oklahoma, authorized by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved June 28, 
1938 (commonly referred to as the ``Flood Control Act of 1938'') (52 
Stat. 1218). Notwithstanding title I of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) or any other provision of law, any 
increase in water supply yield that results from the pool level of 478 
feet shall be treated as unallocated water supply until such time as a 
user enters into a contract for the supply under such applicable laws 
concerning cost-sharing as are in effect on the date of the 
contract.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 213. ABANDONED AND WRECKED BARGE REMOVAL, RHODE 
              ISLAND.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 361 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4861) is amended by striking subsection 
(a) and inserting the following:</DELETED>
<DELETED>    ``(a) In General.--In order to alleviate a hazard to 
navigation and recreational activity, the Secretary shall remove a 
sunken barge from waters off the shore of the Narragansett Town Beach 
in Narragansett, Rhode Island, at a total cost of $1,700,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $1,275,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $425,000. The Secretary shall not remove the barge until title to 
the barge has been transferred to the United States or the non-Federal 
interest. The transfer of title shall be carried out at no cost to the 
United States.''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 214. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RHODE ISLAND.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Secretary shall incorporate a channel extending from 
the vicinity of the Fox Point hurricane barrier to the vicinity of the 
Francis Street bridge in Providence, Rhode Island, into the navigation 
project for Providence River and Harbor, Rhode Island, authorized by 
section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 
Stat. 1089). The channel shall have a depth of up to 10 feet and a 
width of approximately 120 feet and shall be approximately 1.25 miles 
in length.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 215. RUDEE INLET, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Notwithstanding the limitation set forth in section 107(b) 
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(b)), Federal 
participation in the maintenance of the Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, 
Virginia, project shall continue for the life of the project. Nothing 
in this section shall alter or modify the non-Federal cost sharing 
responsibility as specified in the Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, 
Virginia Detailed Project Report, dated October 1983.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 216. VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 407 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(Public Law 101-640; 104 Stat. 4647) is amended by adding at the end 
the following:</DELETED>
<DELETED>    ``(c) Funding.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall budget, for 
        fiscal year 1996, $3,120,803, or such amount as is determined 
        by a Federal audit carried out by the Army Corps of Engineers, 
        to be paid to the city of Virginia Beach as reimbursement for 
        beach nourishment activities undertaken by the city from 
        October 1, 1986, to September 30, 1993, pursuant to subsection 
        (a). The funds required to be budgeted under the preceding 
        sentence may not be used to carry out the beach nourishment 
        project being performed, as of the date of enactment of this 
        paragraph, pursuant to the local cooperative agreement dated 
        August 9, 1993.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(2) Failure to pay.--If the Secretary does not 
        make the payment described in paragraph (1) by February 6, 
        1997, the Secretary shall pay to the city of Virginia Beach 
        $3,120,803, or such amount as is determined by the Federal 
        audit referred to in paragraph (1).''.</DELETED>

            <DELETED>TITLE III--GENERAL PROVISIONS</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 301. COST-SHARING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the 
        end;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at 
        the end and inserting ``; and''; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(7) environmental protection and restoration: 25 
        percent.''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 302. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 7 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 
(33 U.S.C. 2313) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) by striking subsection (e);</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection 
        (e); and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the 
        following:</DELETED>
<DELETED>    ``(d) Temporary Protection of Technology.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(1) Pre-agreement.--If the Secretary determines 
        that information developed as a result of a research or 
        development activity conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers 
        is likely to be subject to a cooperative research and 
        development agreement within 2 years after the development of 
        the information, and that the information would be a trade 
        secret or commercial or financial information that would be 
        privileged or confidential if the information had been obtained 
        from a non-Federal party participating in a cooperative 
        research and development agreement under section 12 of the 
        Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 
        3710a), the Secretary may provide appropriate protections 
        against the dissemination of the information, including 
        exemption from subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United 
        States Code, until the earlier of--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    ``(A) the date on which the Secretary 
                enters into such an agreement with respect to the 
                information; or</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    ``(B) the last day of the 2-year period 
                beginning on the date of the determination.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(2) Post-agreement.--Any information subject to 
        paragraph (1) that becomes the subject of a cooperative 
        research and development agreement shall be subject to the 
        protections provided under section 12(c)(7)(B) of the Act (15 
        U.S.C. 3710a(c)(7)(B)) as if the information had been developed 
        under a cooperative research and development 
        agreement.''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 303. NATIONAL INVENTORY OF DAMS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 13 of Public Law 92-367 (33 U.S.C. 467l) is 
amended by striking the second sentence and inserting the following: 
``There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 
$500,000 for each fiscal year.''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 304. HYDROELECTRIC POWER PROJECT UPRATING.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--In carrying out the maintenance, 
rehabilitation, and modernization of a hydroelectric power generating 
facility at a water resources project under the jurisdiction of the 
Department of the Army, the Secretary is authorized to take such 
actions as are necessary to increase the efficiency of energy 
production or the capacity of the facility, or both, if, after 
consulting with the heads of other appropriate Federal and State 
agencies, the Secretary determines that the increase--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) is economically justified and financially 
        feasible;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) will not result in any significant adverse 
        effect on the other purposes for which the project is 
        authorized;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) will not result in significant adverse 
        environmental impacts; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (4) will not involve major structural or 
        operational changes in the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Effect on Other Authority.--This section shall not 
affect the authority of the Secretary and the Administrator of the 
Bonneville Power Administration under section 2406 of the Energy Policy 
Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 839d-1).</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 305. FEDERAL LUMP-SUM PAYMENTS FOR FEDERAL OPERATION AND 
              MAINTENANCE COSTS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--In the case of a water resources project 
under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army for which the non-
Federal interests are responsible for performing the operation, 
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project, or a 
separable element (as defined in section 103(f) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(f)) of the project, and for 
which the Federal Government is responsible for paying a portion of the 
operation, maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation costs of the 
project or separable element, the Secretary may make, in accordance 
with this section and under terms and conditions acceptable to the 
Secretary, a payment of the estimated total Federal share of the costs 
to the non-Federal interests after completion of construction of the 
project or separable element.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Amount of Payment.--The amount that may be paid by the 
Secretary under subsection (a) shall be equal to the present value of 
the Federal payments over the life of the project, as estimated by the 
Federal Government, and shall be computed using an interest rate 
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury taking into consideration 
current market yields on outstanding marketable obligations of the 
United States with maturities comparable to the remaining life of the 
project.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (c) Agreement.--The Secretary may make a payment under 
this section only if the non-Federal interests have entered into a 
binding agreement with the Secretary to perform the operation, 
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project or 
separable element. The agreement shall--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) meet the requirements of section 221 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b); and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) specify--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) the terms and conditions under which a 
                payment may be made under this section; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) the rights of, and remedies available 
                to, the Federal Government to recover all or a portion 
                of a payment made under this section if a non-Federal 
                interest suspends or terminates the performance by the 
                non-Federal interest of the operation, maintenance, 
                replacement, and rehabilitation of the project or 
                separable element, or fails to perform the activities 
                in a manner that is satisfactory to the 
                Secretary.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (d) Effect of Payment.--Except as provided in subsection 
(c), a payment provided to the non-Federal interests under this section 
shall relieve the Federal Government of any obligation, after the date 
of the payment, to pay any of the operation, maintenance, replacement, 
or rehabilitation costs for the project or separable element.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 306. COST-SHARING FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING PROJECT 
              FEATURES.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    After the date of enactment of this Act, any proposal 
submitted to Congress by the Secretary for modification of an existing 
authorized water resources development project (in existence on the 
date of the proposal) by removal of one or more of the project features 
that would significantly and adversely impact the authorized project 
purposes or outputs shall include the recommendation that the non-
Federal interests shall provide 50 percent of the cost of any such 
modification, including the cost of acquiring any additional interests 
in lands that become necessary for accomplishing the 
modification.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 307. TERMINATION OF TECHNICAL ADVISORY 
              COMMITTEE.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(33 U.S.C. 2319) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) by striking subsection (a); and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) in subsection (b)--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) by striking ``(b) Public 
                Participation.--''; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) by striking ``subsection'' each place 
                it appears and inserting ``section''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 308. CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``10'' and 
        inserting ``5'';</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Before'' 
        and inserting ``Upon official''; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) in the last sentence, by inserting ``the 
        planning, design, or'' before ``construction''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 52 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-676; 102 Stat. 4044) 
is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) by striking subsection (a) (33 U.S.C. 579a 
        note);</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) 
        as subsections (a) through (d), respectively; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated), by 
        striking ``or subsection (a) of this section''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 309. PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING AND 
              SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCES.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (33 U.S.C. 
701u) is repealed.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 310. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL 
              WORKS PROGRAM.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--In carrying out research and development 
in support of the civil works program of the Department of the Army, 
the Secretary may utilize contracts, cooperative research and 
development agreements, and cooperative agreements with, and grants to, 
non-Federal entities, including State and local governments, colleges 
and universities, consortia, professional and technical societies, 
public and private scientific and technical foundations, research 
institutions, educational organizations, and nonprofit 
organizations.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Commercial Application.--In the case of a contract for 
research or development, or both, the Secretary may--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) require that the research or development, or 
        both, have potential commercial application; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) use the potential for commercial application 
        as an evaluation factor, if appropriate.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 311. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT 
              AUTHORITY.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities in 
support of other Federal agencies or international organizations to 
address problems of national significance to the United States. The 
Secretary may engage in activities in support of international 
organizations only after consulting with the Secretary of State. The 
Secretary may use the technical and managerial expertise of the Army 
Corps of Engineers to address domestic and international problems 
related to water resources, infrastructure development, and 
environmental protection.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Funding.--There are authorized to be appropriated 
$1,000,000 to carry out this section. The Secretary may accept and 
expend additional funds from other Federal agencies or international 
organizations to carry this section.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 312. EXPANSION OF SECTION 1135 PROGRAM.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the 
        period at the end the following: ``and to determine if the 
        operation of the projects has contributed to the degradation of 
        the quality of the environment'';</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) in subsection (b), by striking the last two 
        sentences;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) 
        as subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the 
        following new subsections:</DELETED>
<DELETED>    ``(c) Measures To Restore Environmental Quality.--If the 
Secretary determines under subsection (a) that operation of a water 
resources project has contributed to the degradation of the quality of 
the environment, the Secretary may carry out, with respect to the 
project, measures for the restoration of environmental quality, if the 
measures are feasible and consistent with the authorized purposes of 
the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    ``(d) Funding.--The non-Federal share of the cost of any 
modification or measure carried out pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) 
shall be 25 percent. Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may be 
expended on any 1 such modification or measure.''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 313. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(Public Law 101-640; 33 U.S.C. 1252 note) is amended by striking 
subsection (f).</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 314. FEASIBILITY STUDIES.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Non-Federal Share.--Section 105(a)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)(1)) is amended--
</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``during 
        the period of such study'';</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) by inserting after the first sentence the 
        following: ``During the period of the study, the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the study shall be not more than 50 
        percent of the estimate of the cost of the study as contained 
        in the feasibility cost sharing agreement. The cost estimate 
        may be amended only by mutual agreement of the Secretary and 
        the non-Federal interests. The non-Federal share of any costs 
        in excess of the cost estimate shall, except as otherwise 
        mutually agreed by the Secretary and the non-Federal interests, 
        be payable after the project has been authorized for 
        construction and on the date on which the Secretary and non-
        Federal interests enter into an agreement pursuant to section 
        101(e) or 103(j).''; and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) in the last sentence, by striking ``such non-
        Federal contribution'' and inserting ``the non-Federal share 
        required under this paragraph''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) 
shall apply notwithstanding any feasibility cost sharing agreement 
entered into by the Secretary and non-Federal interests, and the 
Secretary shall amend any feasibility cost sharing agreements in effect 
on the date of enactment of this Act so as to conform the agreements 
with the amendments. Nothing in this section or any amendment made by 
this section shall require the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal 
interests for funds previously contributed for a study.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 315. OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL REQUIREMENT.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Penalty.--Section 16 of the Act entitled ``An Act 
making appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
approved March 3, 1899 (commonly referred to as the ``River and Harbor 
Act of 1899'') (33 U.S.C. 411), is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) by striking ``sections thirteen, fourteen, and 
        fifteen'' and inserting ``section 13, 14, 15, 19, or 20''; 
        and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) by striking ``not exceeding twenty-five 
        hundred dollars nor less than five hundred dollars'' and 
        inserting ``of not more than $25,000 for each day that the 
        violation continues''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) General Authority.--Section 20 of the Act (33 U.S.C. 
415) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) in subsection (a)--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) by striking ``Under emergency'' and 
                inserting ``Summary Removal Procedures.--Under 
                emergency''; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) by striking ``expense'' the first 
                place it appears and inserting ``actual expense, 
                including administrative expenses,'';</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) in subsection (b)--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) by striking ``cost'' and inserting 
                ``actual cost, including administrative costs,''; 
                and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) by striking ``(b) The'' and inserting 
                ``(c) Liability of Owner, Lessee, or Operator.--The''; 
                and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the 
        following:</DELETED>
<DELETED>    ``(b) Removal Requirement.--Not later than 24 hours after 
the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating 
issues an order to stop or delay navigation in any navigable waters of 
the United States because of conditions related to the sinking or 
grounding of a vessel, the owner or operator of the vessel, with the 
approval of the Secretary of the Army, shall begin removal of the 
vessel using the most expeditious removal method available or, if 
appropriate, secure the vessel pending removal to allow navigation to 
resume. If the owner or operator fails to begin removal or to secure 
the vessel pending removal in accordance with the preceding sentence or 
fails to complete removal as soon as possible, the Secretary of the 
Army shall remove or destroy the vessel using the summary removal 
procedures under subsection (a).''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 316. LEVEE OWNERS MANUAL.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood 
control, and for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 
701n), is amended by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
<DELETED>    ``(c) Levee Owners Manual.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the 
        date of enactment of this subsection, in accordance with 
        chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, the Secretary shall 
        prepare a manual describing the maintenance and upkeep 
        responsibilities that the Army Corps of Engineers requires of a 
        non-Federal interest in order for the non-Federal interest to 
        receive Federal assistance under this section. The Secretary 
        shall provide a copy of the manual at no cost to each non-
        Federal interest that is eligible to receive Federal assistance 
        under this section.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(2) Prohibition on delegation.--The preparation 
        of the manual shall be carried out under the personal direction 
        of the Secretary.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(3) Authorization of appropriations.--There are 
        authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out this 
        subsection.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(4) Definitions.--In this subsection:</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    ``(A) Maintenance and upkeep.--The term 
                `maintenance and upkeep' means all maintenance and 
                general upkeep of a levee performed on a regular and 
                consistent basis that is not repair and 
                rehabilitation.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    ``(B) Repair and rehabilitation.--The term 
                `repair and rehabilitation'--</DELETED>
                        <DELETED>    ``(i) except as provided in clause 
                        (ii), means the repair or rebuilding of a levee 
                        or other flood control structure, after the 
                        structure has been damaged by a flood, to the 
                        level of protection provided by the structure 
                        before the flood; and</DELETED>
                        <DELETED>    ``(ii) does not include--
                        </DELETED>
                                <DELETED>    ``(I) any improvement to 
                                the structure; or</DELETED>
                                <DELETED>    ``(II) repair or 
                                rebuilding described in clause (i) if, 
                                in the normal course of usage, the 
                                structure becomes structurally unsound 
                                and is no longer fit to provide the 
                                level of protection for which the 
                                structure was designed.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    ``(C) Secretary.--The term `Secretary' 
                means the Secretary of the Army.''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 317. RISK-BASED ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall obtain the services of an 
independent consultant to evaluate--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) the relationship between--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) the Risk-Based Analysis for Evaluation 
                of Hydrology/Hydraulics and Economics in Flood Damage 
                Reduction Studies established in an Army Corps of 
                Engineers engineering circular; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) minimum engineering and safety 
                standards;</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) the validity of results generated by the 
        studies described in paragraph (1); and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) policy impacts related to change in the 
        studies described in paragraph (1).</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Task Force.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) In general.--In carrying out the independent 
        evaluation under subsection (a), the Secretary, not later than 
        90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, shall 
        establish a task force to oversee and review the 
        analysis.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Membership.--The task force shall consist of--
        </DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) the Assistant Secretary of the Army 
                having responsibility for civil works, who shall serve 
                as chairperson of the task force;</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) the Administrator of the Federal 
                Emergency Management Agency;</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (C) the Chief of the Natural Resources 
                Conservation Service of the Department of 
                Agriculture;</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (D) a State representative appointed by 
                the Secretary from among individuals recommended by the 
                Association of State Floodplain Managers;</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (E) a local government public works 
                official appointed by the Secretary from among 
                individuals recommended by a national organization 
                representing public works officials; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (F) an individual from the private sector, 
                who shall be appointed by the Secretary.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) Compensation.--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), a member of the task force shall 
                serve without compensation.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) Expenses.--Each member of the task 
                force shall be allowed--</DELETED>
                        <DELETED>    (i) travel expenses, including per 
                        diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates 
                        authorized for employees of agencies under 
                        subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United 
                        States Code, while away from the home or 
                        regular place of business of the member in the 
                        performance of services for the task force; 
                        and</DELETED>
                        <DELETED>    (ii) other expenses incurred in 
                        the performance of services for the task force, 
                        as determined by the Secretary.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (4) Termination.--The task force shall terminate 2 
        years after the date of enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (c) Limitation on Use of Methodology.--During the period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending 2 years after 
that date, if requested by a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall 
refrain from using any risk-based technique required under the studies 
described in subsection (a) for the evaluation and design of a project 
carried out in cooperation with the non-Federal interest unless the 
Secretary, in consultation with the task force, has provided direction 
for use of the technique after consideration of the independent 
evaluation required under subsection (a).</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
to be appropriated $500,000 to carry out this section.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 318. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(Public Law 102-580; 33 U.S.C. 2239 note) is amended--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) in subsection (a)--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end 
                the following: ``The goal of the program shall be to 
                make possible the development, on a pilot scale, of 1 
                or more sediment decontamination technologies, each of 
                which demonstrates a sediment decontamination capacity 
                of at least 400 cubic yards per day.''; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) by adding at the end the 
                following:</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    ``(3) Report to congress.--Not later than 
        September 30, 1996, and September 30 of each year thereafter, 
        the Administrator and the Secretary shall report to Congress on 
        progress made toward the goal described in paragraph (2).''; 
        and</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) in subsection (c)--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
                inserting ``$10,000,000''; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) by striking ``1992'' and inserting 
                ``1995''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 319. MELALEUCA TREE.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Section 104(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 
U.S.C. 610(a)) is amended by inserting ``melaleuca tree,'' after 
``milfoil,''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 320. FAULKNER ISLAND, CONNECTICUT.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    In consultation with the Director of the United States 
Fish and Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall design and construct 
shoreline protection measures for the coastline adjacent to the 
Faulkner Island Lighthouse, Connecticut, at a total cost of 
$3,300,000.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 321. DESIGNATION OF LOCK AND DAM AT THE RED RIVER 
              WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Designation.--Lock and Dam numbered 4 of the Red River 
Waterway, Louisiana, is designated as the ``Russell B. Long Lock and 
Dam''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Legal References.--A reference in any law, regulation, 
document, map, record, or other paper of the United States to the lock 
and dam referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Russell B. Long Lock and Dam''.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 322. JENNINGS RANDOLPH ACCESS ROAD, GARRETT COUNTY, 
              MARYLAND.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Secretary shall transfer up to $600,000 from the funds 
appropriated for the Jennings Randolph Lake, Maryland and West 
Virginia, project to the State of Maryland for use by the State in 
constructing an access road to the William Jennings Randolph Lake in 
Garrett County, Maryland.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 323. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) In General.--In order to make capital improvements to 
the New York State canal system, the Secretary, with the consent of 
appropriate local and State entities, shall enter into such 
arrangements, contracts, and leases with public and private entities as 
may be necessary for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation, 
preservation, and maintenance of the New York State canal system and 
related facilities, including trailside facilities and other 
recreational projects along the waterways referred to in subsection 
(c).</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
capital improvements under this section shall be 50 percent. The total 
cost is $14,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,000,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,000,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (c) Definition of New York State Canal System.--In this 
section, the term ``New York State canal system'' means the Erie, 
Oswego, Champlain, and Cayuga-Seneca Canals in New York.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 324. QUONSET POINT-DAVISVILLE, RHODE ISLAND.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Secretary shall replace the bulkhead between piers 1 
and 2 at the Quonset Point-Davisville Industrial Park, Rhode Island, at 
a total cost of $1,350,000. The estimated Federal share of the project 
cost is $1,012,500, and the estimated non-Federal share of the project 
cost is $337,500. In conjunction with this project, the Secretary shall 
install high mast lighting at pier 2 at a total cost of $300,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $225,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $75,000.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 325. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WASHINGTON 
              AQUEDUCT.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Authorizations.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) Authorization of modernization.--Subject to 
        approval in, and in such amounts as may be provided in 
        appropriations Acts, the Chief of Engineers of the Army Corps 
        of Engineers is authorized to modernize the Washington 
        Aqueduct.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is 
        authorized to be appropriated to the Army Corps of Engineers 
        borrowing authority in amounts sufficient to cover the full 
        costs of modernizing the Washington Aqueduct. The borrowing 
        authority shall be provided by the Secretary of the Treasury, 
        under such terms and conditions as are established by the 
        Secretary of the Treasury, after a series of contracts with 
        each public water supply customer has been entered into under 
        subsection (b).</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Contracts With Public Water Supply Customers.--
</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) Contracts to repay corps debt.--To the extent 
        provided in appropriations Acts, and in accordance with 
        paragraphs (2) and (3), the Chief of Engineers of the Army 
        Corps of Engineers is authorized to enter into a series of 
        contracts with each public water supply customer under which 
        the customer commits to repay a pro-rata share of the principal 
        and interest owed by the Army Corps of Engineers to the 
        Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (a). Under each of 
        the contracts, the customer that enters into the contract shall 
        commit to pay any additional amount necessary to fully offset 
        the risk of default on the contract.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Offsetting of risk of default.--Each contract 
        under paragraph (1) shall include such additional terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary of the Treasury may require so that 
        the value to the Government of the contracts is estimated to be 
        equal to the obligational authority used by the Army Corps of 
        Engineers for modernizing the Washington Aqueduct at the time 
        that each series of contracts is entered into.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) Other conditions.--Each contract entered into 
        under paragraph (1) shall--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) provide that the public water supply 
                customer pledges future income from fees assessed to 
                operate and maintain the Washington Aqueduct;</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) provide the United States priority 
                over all other creditors; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (C) include other conditions that the 
                Secretary of the Treasury determines to be 
                appropriate.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (c) Borrowing Authority.--Subject to an appropriation 
under subsection (a)(2) and after entering into a series of contracts 
under subsection (b), the Secretary, acting through the Chief of 
Engineers of the Army Corps of Engineers, shall seek borrowing 
authority from the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection 
(a)(2).</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (d) Definitions.--In this section:</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) Public water supply customer.--The term 
        ``public water supply customer'' means the District of 
        Columbia, the county of Arlington, Virginia, and the city of 
        Falls Church, Virginia.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Value to the government.--The term ``value to 
        the Government'' means the net present value of a contract 
        under subsection (b) calculated under the rules set forth in 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 502(5) of the 
        Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)), excluding 
        section 502(5)(B)(i) of the Act, as though the contracts 
        provided for the repayment of direct loans to the public water 
        supply customers.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (3) Washington aqueduct.--The term ``Washington 
        Aqueduct'' means the water supply system of treatment plans, 
        raw water intakes, conduits, reservoirs, transmission mains, 
        and pumping stations owned by the Federal Government located in 
        the metropolitan Washington, District of Columbia, 
        area.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 326. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND 
              PROTECTION PROGRAM.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Establishment.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a 
        pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
        Federal interests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Form.--The assistance shall be in the form of 
        design and construction assistance for water-related 
        environmental infrastructure and resource protection and 
        development projects affecting the Chesapeake Bay estuary, 
        including projects for sediment and erosion control, protection 
        of eroding shorelines, protection of essential public works, 
        wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and 
        related facilities, and beneficial uses of dredged material, 
        and other related projects that may enhance the living 
        resources of the estuary.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may 
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the project 
is publicly owned, and will be publicly operated and 
maintained.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (c) Local Cooperation Agreement.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under 
        this section, the Secretary shall enter into a local 
        cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide 
        for design and construction of the project to be carried out 
        with the assistance.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation 
        agreement entered into under this subsection shall provide 
        for--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) the development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications and an estimate of expected 
                resource benefits; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) the establishment of such legal and 
                institutional structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation and maintenance of the 
                project by the non-Federal interest.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (d) Cost Sharing.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) Federal share.--Except as provided in 
        paragraph (2)(B), the Federal share of the total project costs 
        of each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
        section shall be 75 percent.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Non-federal share.--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) Value of lands, easements, rights-of-
                way, and relocations.--In determining the non-Federal 
                contribution toward carrying out a local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this section, the 
                Secretary shall provide credit to a non-Federal 
                interest for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-
                way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal 
                interest, except that the amount of credit provided for 
                a project under this paragraph may not exceed 25 
                percent of the total project costs.</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) Operation and maintenance costs.--The 
                non-Federal share of the costs of operation and 
                maintenance of carrying out the agreement under this 
                section shall be 100 percent.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws and 
Agreements.--</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (1) In general.--Nothing in this section waives, 
        limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any provision 
        of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project 
        carried out with assistance provided under this 
        section.</DELETED>
        <DELETED>    (2) Cooperation.--In carrying out this section, 
        the Secretary shall cooperate fully with the heads of 
        appropriate Federal agencies, including--</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (A) the Administrator of the Environmental 
                Protection Agency;</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (B) the Secretary of Commerce, acting 
                through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and 
                Atmospheric Administration;</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (C) the Secretary of the Interior, acting 
                through the Director of the United States Fish and 
                Wildlife Service; and</DELETED>
                <DELETED>    (D) the heads of such other Federal 
                agencies and agencies of a State or political 
                subdivision of a State as the Secretary determines to 
                be appropriate.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (f) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary shall establish 
at least 1 project under this section in each of the States of 
Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. A project established under this 
section shall be carried out using such measures as are necessary to 
protect environmental, historic, and cultural resources.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the 
Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the 
program carried out under this section, together with a recommendation 
concerning whether or not the program should be implemented on a 
national basis.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized 
to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 for fiscal 
year 1996, to remain available until expended.</DELETED>

<DELETED>SEC. 327. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    (a) Contributions for Environmental and Recreation 
Projects.--Section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (33 U.S.C. 2325(b)) is amended by striking ``(8662)'' and 
inserting ``(8862)''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>    (b) Challenge Cost-Sharing Program.--The second sentence 
of section 225(c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 2328(c)) is amended by striking 
``(8662)'' and inserting ``(8862)''.</DELETED>

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 1995''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Project modifications.
Sec. 103. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 104. Studies.

                  TITLE II--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Heber Springs, Arkansas.
Sec. 202. Morgan Point, Arkansas.
Sec. 203. White River Basin Lakes, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 204. Central and southern Florida.
Sec. 205. West Palm Beach, Florida.
Sec. 206. Periodic maintenance dredging for Greenville Inner Harbor 
                            Channel, Mississippi.
Sec. 207. Sardis Lake, Mississippi.
Sec. 208. Libby Dam, Montana.
Sec. 209. Small flood control project, Malta, Montana.
Sec. 210. Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey.
Sec. 211. Fire Island Inlet, New York.
Sec. 212. Buford Trenton Irrigation District, North Dakota and Montana.
Sec. 213. Wister Lake project, LeFlore County, Oklahoma.
Sec. 214. Willamette River, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon.
Sec. 215. Abandoned and wrecked barge removal, Rhode Island.
Sec. 216. Providence River and Harbor, Rhode Island.
Sec. 217. Cooper Lake and Channels, Texas.
Sec. 218. Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 219. Virginia Beach, Virginia.

                     TITLE III--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Cost-sharing for environmental projects.
Sec. 302. Collaborative research and development.
Sec. 303. National inventory of dams.
Sec. 304. Hydroelectric power project uprating.
Sec. 305. Federal lump-sum payments for Federal operation and 
                            maintenance costs.
Sec. 306. Cost-sharing for removal of existing project features.
Sec. 307. Termination of technical advisory committee.
Sec. 308. Conditions for project deauthorizations.
Sec. 309. Participation in international engineering and scientific 
                            conferences.
Sec. 310. Research and development in support of Army civil works 
                            program.
Sec. 311. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 312. Section 1135 program.
Sec. 313. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 314. Feasibility studies.
Sec. 315. Obstruction removal requirement.
Sec. 316. Levee owners manual.
Sec. 317. Risk-based analysis methodology.
Sec. 318. Sediments decontamination technology.
Sec. 319. Melaleuca tree.
Sec. 320. Faulkner Island, Connecticut.
Sec. 321. Designation of lock and dam at the Red River Waterway, 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 322. Jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission, Louisiana.
Sec. 323. William Jennings Randolph access road, Garrett County, 
                            Maryland.
Sec. 324. Arkabutla Dam and Lake, Mississippi.
Sec. 325. New York State canal system.
Sec. 326. Quonset Point-Davisville, Rhode Island.
Sec. 327. Clouter Creek disposal area, Charleston, South Carolina.
Sec. 328. Nuisance aquatic vegetation in Lake Gaston, Virginia and 
                            North Carolina.
Sec. 329. Capital improvements for the Washington Aqueduct.
Sec. 330. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection 
                            program.
Sec. 331. Research and development program to improve salmon survival.
Sec. 332. Recreational user fees.
Sec. 333. Shoreline erosion control demonstration.
Sec. 334. Technical corrections.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following 
projects for water resources development and conservation and other 
purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary 
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, recommended in the respective reports designated in this 
section:
            (1) Marin county shoreline, san rafael canal, california.--
        The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Marin 
        County Shoreline, San Rafael Canal, California: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated January 28, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $27,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,700,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,500,000.
            (2) San lorenzo river, california.--The project for flood 
        control, San Lorenzo River, California: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $16,100,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $8,100,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $8,000,000 and the habitat restoration, at 
        a total cost of $4,050,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $3,040,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,010,000.
            (3) Santa barbara harbor, santa barbara county, 
        california.--The project for navigation, Santa Barbara Harbor, 
        Santa Barbara, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated April 26, 1994, at a total cost of $5,720,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $4,580,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $1,140,000.
            (4) Palm valley bridge replacement, st. johns county, 
        florida.--The project for navigation, Palm Valley Bridge, 
        County Road 210, over the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in St. 
        Johns County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated 
        June 24, 1994, at a total Federal cost of $15,312,000. As a 
        condition of receipt of Federal funds, St. Johns County shall 
        assume full ownership of the replacement bridge, including all 
        associated operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and 
        rehabilitation costs.
            (5) Illinois shoreline erosion, interim iii, wilmette to 
        illinois and indiana state line.--The project for storm damage 
        reduction and shoreline erosion protection from Wilmette, 
        Illinois, to the Illinois and Indiana State line: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated April 14, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $204,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $110,000,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $94,000,000, and the 
        breakwater near the South Water Filtration Plant, a separable 
        element of the project at a total cost of $8,539,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $5,550,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $2,989,000. The operation, maintenance, repair, 
        replacement, and rehabilitation of the project after 
        construction shall be the responsibility of the non-Federal 
        interests.
            (6) Kentucky lock addition, kentucky.--The project for 
        navigation, Kentucky Lock Addition, Kentucky: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated June 1, 1992, at a total cost of 
        $467,000,000. The construction costs of the project shall be 
        paid--
                    (A) 50 percent from amounts appropriated from the 
                general fund of the Treasury; and
                    (B) 50 percent from amounts appropriated from the 
                Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by section 9506 
                of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
            (7) Wolf creek hydropower, cumberland river, kentucky.--The 
        project for hydropower, Wolf Creek Dam and Lake Cumberland, 
        Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 
        1994, at a total cost of $50,230,000. Funds derived by the 
        Tennessee Valley Authority from the power program of the 
        Authority and funds derived from any private or public entity 
        designated by the Southeastern Power Administration may be used 
for all or part of any cost-sharing requirements for the project.
            (8) Port fourchon, louisiana.--The project for navigation, 
        Port Fourchon, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated April 7, 1995, at a total cost of $2,812,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $2,211,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $601,000.
            (9) West bank hurricane protection levee, jefferson parish, 
        louisiana.--The West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson 
        Parish, Louisiana project, authorized by section 401(b) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 
        Stat. 4128), is modified to authorize the Secretary to extend 
        protection to areas east of the Harvey Canal, including an area 
        east of the Algiers Canal: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated May 1, 1995, at a total cost of $217,000,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $141,400,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $75,600,000.
            (10) Stabilization of natchez bluffs, mississippi.--The 
        project for bluff stabilization, Natchez Bluffs, Natchez, 
        Mississippi: Natchez Bluffs Study, dated September 1985, 
        Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement I, dated June 1990, and 
        Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement II, dated December 1993, in 
        the portions of the bluffs described in the reports designated 
        in this paragraph as Clifton Avenue, area 3; Bluff above Silver 
        Street, area 6; Bluff above Natchez Under-the-Hill, area 7; and 
        Madison Street to State Street, area 4, at a total cost of 
        $17,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,900,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,300,000.
            (11) Wood river at grand island, nebraska.--The project for 
        flood control, Wood River at Grand Island, Nebraska: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated May 3, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $10,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,250,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,250,000.
            (12) Wilmington harbor, cape fear-northeast cape fear 
        rivers, north carolina.--The project for navigation, Wilmington 
        Harbor, Cape Fear-Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, North Carolina: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a 
        total cost of $23,290,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $16,955,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,335,000.
            (13) Duck creek, ohio.--The project for flood control, Duck 
        Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers, 
        dated June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $15,408,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $11,556,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $3,852,000.
            (14) Pond creek, ohio.--The project for flood control, Pond 
        Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28, 
        1994, at a total cost of $16,865,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $11,243,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $5,622,000.
            (15) Coos bay, oregon.--The project for navigation, Coos 
        Bay, Oregon: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 
        1994, at a total cost of $14,541,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $10,777,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,764,000.
            (16) Big sioux river and skunk creek at sioux falls, south 
        dakota.--The project for flood control, Big Sioux River and 
        Skunk Creek at Sioux Falls, South Dakota: Report of the Chief 
        of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $31,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $23,600,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,000,000.
            (17) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge replacement at 
        great bridge, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for navigation 
        at Great Bridge, Virginia Highway 168, over the Atlantic 
        Intracoastal Waterway in Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated July 1, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $23,680,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,341,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,339,000. The city of 
        Chesapeake shall assume full ownership of the replacement 
        bridge, including all associated operation, maintenance, 
        repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs.
            (18) Marmet lock replacement, kanawha river, west 
        virginia.--The project for navigation, Marmet Lock Replacement, 
        Marmet Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, West Virginia: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of 
        $257,900,000. The construction costs of the project shall be 
        paid--
                    (A) 50 percent from amounts appropriated from the 
                general fund of the Treasury; and
                    (B) 50 percent from amounts appropriated from the 
                Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by section 9506 
                of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

SEC. 102. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

    (a) Oakland Harbor, California.--The projects for navigation, 
Oakland Outer Harbor, California, and Oakland Inner Harbor, California, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4092), are modified to combine the 2 
projects into 1 project, to be designated as the Oakland Harbor, 
California, project. The Oakland Harbor, California, project shall be 
carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans 
and subject to the conditions recommended in the reports designated for 
the projects in the section, except that the non-Federal share of 
project cost and any available credits toward the non-Federal share 
shall be calculated on the basis of the total cost of the combined 
project. The total cost of the combined project is $102,600,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $64,120,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $38,480,000.
    (b) Broward County, Florida.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide periodic beach 
        nourishment for the Broward County, Florida, Hillsborough Inlet 
        to Port Everglades (Segment II), shore protection project, 
        authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 
        (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 1090), through the year 2020. The 
        beach nourishment shall be carried out in accordance with the 
        recommendations of the section 934 study and reevaluation 
        report for the project carried out under section 156 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5f) 
        and approved by the Chief of Engineers by memorandum dated June 
        9, 1995.
            (2) Costs.--The total cost of the activities required under 
        this subsection shall not exceed $15,457,000, of which the 
        Federal share shall not exceed $9,846,000.
    (c) Canaveral Harbor, Florida.--The project for navigation, 
Canaveral Harbor, Florida, authorized by section 101(7) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4802), 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to reclassify the removal and 
replacement of stone protection on both sides of the channel as general 
navigation features of the project subject to cost sharing in 
accordance with section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)). The Secretary may reimburse the non-
Federal interests for such costs incurred by the non-Federal interests 
in connection with the removal and replacement as the Secretary 
determines are in excess of the non-Federal share of the costs of the 
project required under the section.
    (d) Fort Pierce, Florida.--The Secretary shall provide periodic 
beach nourishment for the Fort Pierce beach erosion control project, 
St. Lucie County, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 1092), through the year 
2020.
    (e) North Branch of Chicago River, Illinois.--The project for flood 
control for the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, authorized 
by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out the project substantially in accordance with the 
post authorization change report for the project dated March 1994, at a 
total cost of $34,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$20,774,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,026,000.
    (f) Arkansas City, Kansas.--The project for flood control, Arkansas 
City, Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4116), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report 
for the project dated June 1994, at a total cost of $35,700,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $26,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $9,100,000.
    (g) Halstead, Kansas.--The project for flood control, Halstead, 
Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4116), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct the project substantially in 
accordance with the post authorization change report for the project 
dated March 1993, at a total cost of $11,100,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $8,325,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$2,775,000.
    (h) Baptiste Collette Bayou, Louisiana.--The project for 
navigation, Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, Louisiana, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82 
Stat. 731), is modified to provide for the extension of the 16-foot 
deep (mean low gulf) by 250-foot wide Baptiste Collette Bayou entrance 
channel to approximately mile 8 of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet 
navigation channel at a total estimated Federal cost of $80,000, 
including $4,000 for surveys and $76,000 for Coast Guard aids to 
navigation.
    (i) Manistique Harbor, Michigan.--
            (1) Sand and stone cap.--The project for navigation, 
        Manistique Harbor, Schoolcraft County, Michigan, authorized by 
        the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
        appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation 
        of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
        purposes'', approved March 3, 1905 (33 Stat. 1136), is modified 
        to permit installation of a sand and stone cap over sediments 
        affected by polychlorinated biphenyls, in accordance with an 
        administrative order of the Environmental Protection Agency.
            (2) Project depth.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph 
                (B), the project described in paragraph (1) is modified 
                to provide for an authorized depth of 18 feet.
                    (B) Exception.--The authorized depth shall be 12.5 
                feet in the areas where the sand and stone cap 
                described in paragraph (1) will be placed within the 
                following coordinates: 4220N-2800E to 4220N-3110E to 
                3980N-3260E to 3190N-3040E to 2960N-2560E to 3150N-
                2300E to 3680N-2510E to 3820N-2690E and back to 4220N-
                2800E.
            (3) Harbor of refuge.--The project described in paragraph 
        (1), including the breakwalls, pier, and authorized depth of 
        the project (as modified by paragraph (2)), shall continue to 
        be maintained as a harbor of refuge.
    (j) Stillwater, Minnesota.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare a design memorandum 
for the project authorized by section 363 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4861) for the 
purpose of evaluating the Federal interest in construction of the 
project for flood control and determining the most feasible 
alternative. If the Secretary determines that there is such a Federal 
interest, the Secretary shall construct the most feasible alternative 
at a total cost of not to exceed $11,600,000. The Federal share of the 
cost shall be 75 percent.
    (k) Cape Girardeau, Missouri.--The project for flood control, Cape 
Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan Area, Missouri, authorized by section 
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
662; 100 Stat. 4118-4119), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
carry out the project, including the implementation of nonstructural 
measures, at a total cost of $44,700,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $32,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $12,100,000.
    (l) Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear River, North Carolina.--
The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear 
River, North Carolina, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4095), 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
substantially in accordance with the general design memorandum for the 
project dated April 1990 and the general design memorandum supplement 
for the project dated February 1994, at a total cost of $50,921,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $25,128,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $25,793,000.
    (m) Saw Mill Run, Pennsylvania.--The project for flood control, Saw 
Mill Run, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 
4124), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project 
substantially in accordance with the post authorization change and 
general reevaluation report for the project, dated April 1994, at a 
total cost of $12,780,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,585,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,195,000.
    (n) Allendale Dam, North Providence, Rhode Island.--The project for 
reconstruction of the Allendale Dam, North Providence, Rhode Island, 
authorized by section 358 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4861), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to reconstruct the dam, at a total cost of $350,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $262,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$87,500.
    (o) India Point Bridge, Seekonk River, Providence, Rhode Island.--
The project for the removal and demolition of the India Point Railroad 
Bridge, Seekonk River, Rhode Island, authorized by section 1166(c) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 
Stat. 4258), is modified to authorize the Secretary to demolish and 
remove the center span of the bridge, at a total cost of $1,300,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $650,000, and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $650,000.
    (p) Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas.--
            (1) In general.--The project for flood control, Dallas 
        Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of 
        the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 
        1091), is modified to provide that, notwithstanding the last 
        sentence of section 104(c) of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2214(c)), the Secretary shall credit the 
        cost of work performed by the non-Federal interests in 
        constructing flood protection works for Rochester Park and the 
        Central Wastewater Treatment Plant against the non-Federal 
        share of the cost of the project or any revision of the 
        project.
            (2) Determination of amount.--The amount to be credited 
        under paragraph (1) shall be determined by the Secretary. In 
        determining the amount, the Secretary shall include only the 
        costs of such work performed by the non-Federal interests as 
        is--
                    (A) compatible with the project described in 
                paragraph (1) or any revision of the project; or
                    (B) required for construction of the project or any 
                revision of the project.
            (3) Cash contribution.--Nothing in this subsection limits 
        the applicability of the requirement specified in section 
        103(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
        U.S.C. 2213(a)(1)(A)) to the project described in paragraph 
        (1).
    (q) Matagorda Ship Channel, Port Lavaca, Texas.--The project for 
navigation, Matagorda Ship Channel, Port Lavaca, Texas, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (Public Law 85-500; 72 
Stat. 298), is modified to require the Secretary to assume 
responsibility for the maintenance of the Point Comfort Turning Basin 
Expansion Area to a depth of 36 feet, as constructed by the non-Federal 
interests. The modification described in the preceding sentence shall 
be considered to be in the public interest and to be economically 
justified.
    (r) Upper Jordan River, Utah.--The project for flood control, Upper 
Jordan River, Utah, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640; 104 Stat. 4610), 
is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project 
substantially in accordance with the general design memorandum for the 
project dated March 1994, and the post authorization change report for 
the project dated April 1994, at a total cost of $12,370,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $8,220,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $4,150,000.
    (s) Grundy, Virginia.--The Secretary shall proceed with planning, 
engineering, design, and construction of the Grundy, Virginia, element 
of the Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Upper Cumberland 
River project, authorized by section 202 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (Public Law 96-367; 94 Stat. 1339), 
in accordance with Plan 3A as set forth in the preliminary draft 
detailed project report of the Huntington District Commander, dated 
August 1993.
    (t) Haysi Lake, Virginia and Kentucky.--The Secretary shall 
expedite completion of the flood damage reduction plan for the Levisa 
Fork Basin in Virginia and Kentucky, authorized by section 202 of the 
Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (Public Law 96-
367; 94 Stat. 1339), in a manner that is consistent with the Haysi Lake 
component of the plan for flood control and associated water resource 
features identified by the non-Federal interests.
    (u) Petersburg, West Virginia.--The project for flood control, 
Petersburg, West Virginia, authorized by section 101(a)(26) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640; 104 Stat. 
4611), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
at a total cost of not to exceed $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $19,195,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,405,000.
    (v) Teton County, Wyoming.--Section 840 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4176) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``Secretary: Provided, That'' and inserting 
        the following: ``Secretary. In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary may enter into agreements with the non-Federal 
        sponsors permitting the non-Federal sponsors to perform 
        operation and maintenance for the project on a cost-
        reimbursable basis. The'';
            (2) by inserting ``, through providing in-kind services 
        or'' after ``$35,000''; and
            (3) by inserting a comma after ``materials''.

SEC. 103. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.--
            (1) Anchorage area.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by 
        section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (Public Law 85-
        500; 72 Stat. 297), consisting of a 2-acre anchorage area with 
        a depth of 6 feet at the head of Johnsons River between the 
        Federal channel and Hollisters Dam, is deauthorized.
            (2) Johnsons river channel.--The portion of the project for 
        navigation, Johnsons River Channel, Bridgeport Harbor, 
        Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act 
        entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
        preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and 
        for other purposes'', approved July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 634), 
        that is northerly of a line across the Federal channel the 
        coordinates of which are north 123318.35, east 486301.68, and 
        north 123257.15, east 486380.77, is deauthorized.
    (b) Guilford Harbor, Connecticut.--
            (1) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation, 
        Guilford Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the Act entitled 
        ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation 
        of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
        purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13), that consists 
        of the 6-foot deep channel in Sluice Creek and that is not 
        included in the description of the realigned channel set forth 
        in paragraph (2) is deauthorized.
            (2) Description of realigned channel.--The realigned 
        channel referred to in paragraph (1) is described as follows: 
        starting at a point where the Sluice Creek Channel intersects 
        with the main entrance channel, N159194.63, E623201.07, thence 
        running north 24 degrees, 58 minutes, 15.2 seconds west 478.40 
        feet to a point N159628.31, E622999.11, thence running north 20 
        degrees, 18 minutes, 31.7 seconds west 351.53 feet to a point 
        N159957.99, E622877.10, thence running north 69 degrees, 41 
        minutes, 37.9 seconds east 55.00 feet to a point N159977.08, 
        E622928.69, thence turning and running south 20 degrees, 18 
        minutes, 31.0 seconds east 349.35 feet to a point N159649.45, 
        E623049.94, thence turning and running south 24 degrees, 58 
        minutes, 11.1 seconds east 341.36 feet to a point N159340.00, 
        E623194.04, thence turning and running south 90 degrees, 0 
        minutes, 0 seconds east 78.86 feet to a point N159340.00, 
        E623272.90.
    (c) Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut.--
            (1) In general.--The following portions of projects for 
        navigation, Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut, are deauthorized:
                    (A) The portion authorized by the Act entitled ``An 
                Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, 
                and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
                harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 
                1919 (40 Stat. 1276), that lies northerly of a line 
                across the Federal channel having coordinates 
                N104199.72, E417774.12 and N104155.59, E417628.96.
                    (B) The portions of the 6-foot deep East Norwalk 
                Channel and Anchorage, authorized by the Act entitled 
                ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
                preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
                harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 
                1945 (59 Stat. 13), that are not included in the 
                description of the realigned channel and anchorage set 
                forth in paragraph (2).
            (2) Description of realigned channel and anchorage.--The 
        realigned 6-foot deep East Norwalk Channel and Anchorage 
        referred to in paragraph (1)(B) is described as follows: 
        starting at a point on the East Norwalk Channel, N95743.02, 
        E419581.37, thence running northwesterly about 463.96 feet to a 
        point N96197.93, E419490.18, thence running northwesterly about 
        549.32 feet to a point N96608.49, E419125.23, thence running 
        northwesterly about 384.06 feet to a point N96965.94, 
        E418984.75, thence running northwesterly about 407.26 feet to a 
        point N97353.87, E418860.78, thence running westerly about 
        58.26 feet to a point N97336.26, E418805.24, thence running 
        northwesterly about 70.99 feet to a point N97390.30, 
        E418759.21, thence running westerly about 71.78 feet to a point 
        on the anchorage limit N97405.26, E418689.01, thence running 
        southerly along the western limits of the Federal anchorage in 
        existence on the date of enactment of this Act until reaching a 
        point N95893.74, E419449.17, thence running in a southwesterly 
        direction about 78.74 feet to a point on the East Norwalk 
        Channel N95815.62, E419439.33.
            (3) Designation of realigned channel and anchorage.--All of 
        the realigned channel shall be redesignated as an anchorage, 
        with the exception of the portion of the channel that narrows 
        to a width of 100 feet and terminates at a line the coordinates 
        of which are N96456.81, E419260.06 and N96390.37, E419185.32, 
        which shall remain as a channel.
    (d) Southport Harbor, Connecticut.--
            (1) In general.--The following portions of the project for 
        navigation, Southport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the 
        first section of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
        construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works 
        on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
        August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029), are deauthorized:
                    (A) The 6-foot deep anchorage located at the head 
                of the project.
                    (B) The portion of the 9-foot deep channel 
                beginning at a bend in the channel the coordinates of 
                which are north 109131.16, east 452653.32, running 
                thence in a northeasterly direction about 943.01 feet 
                to a point the coordinates of which are north 
                109635.22, east 453450.31, running thence in a 
                southeasterly direction about 22.66 feet to a point the 
                coordinates of which are north 109617.15, east 
                453463.98, running thence in a southwesterly direction 
                about 945.18 feet to the point of beginning.
            (2) Remainder.--The portion of the project referred to in 
        paragraph (1) that is remaining after the deauthorization made 
        by the paragraph and that is northerly of a line the 
        coordinates of which are north 108699.15, east 452768.36, and 
        north 108655.66, east 452858.73, is redesignated as an 
        anchorage.
    (e) East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--The following portion of the 
navigation project for East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 
first section of the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 631, chapter 382) 
(commonly referred to as the ``River and Harbor Act of 1910''), 
containing approximately 1.15 acres and described in accordance with 
the Maine State Coordinate System, West Zone, is deauthorized:
            Beginning at a point noted as point number 6 and shown as 
        having plan coordinates of North 9, 722, East 9, 909 on the 
        plan entitled, ``East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, examination, 8-
        foot area'', and dated August 9, 1955, Drawing Number F1251 D-
        6-2, said point having Maine State Coordinate System, West Zone 
        coordinates of Northing 74514, Easting 698381; and
            Thence, North 58 degrees, 12 minutes, 30 seconds East a 
        distance of 120.9 feet to a point; and
            Thence, South 72 degrees, 21 minutes, 50 seconds East a 
        distance of 106.2 feet to a point; and
            Thence, South 32 degrees, 04 minutes, 55 seconds East a 
        distance of 218.9 feet to a point; and
            Thence, South 61 degrees, 29 minutes, 40 seconds West a 
        distance of 148.9 feet to a point; and
            Thence, North 35 degrees, 14 minutes, 12 seconds West a 
        distance of 87.5 feet to a point; and
            Thence, North 78 degrees, 30 minutes, 58 seconds West a 
        distance of 68.4 feet to a point; and
            Thence, North 27 degrees, 11 minutes, 39 seconds West a 
        distance of 157.3 feet to the point of beginning.
    (f) York Harbor, Maine.--The following portions of the project for 
navigation, York Harbor, Maine, authorized by section 101 of the River 
and Harbor Act of 1960 (Public Law 86-645; 74 Stat. 480), are 
deauthorized:
            (1) The portion located in the 8-foot deep anchorage area 
        beginning at coordinates N109340.19, E372066.93, thence running 
        north 65 degrees, 12 minutes, 10.5 seconds east 423.27 feet to 
        a point N109517.71, E372451.17, thence running north 28 
        degrees, 42 minutes, 58.3 seconds west 11.68 feet to a point 
        N109527.95, E372445.56, thence running south 63 degrees, 37 
        minutes, 24.6 seconds west 422.63 feet to the point of 
        beginning.
            (2) The portion located in the 8-foot deep anchorage area 
        beginning at coordinates N108557.24, E371645.88, thence running 
        south 60 degrees, 41 minutes, 17.2 seconds east 484.51 feet to 
        a point N108320.04, E372068.36, thence running north 29 
        degrees, 12 minutes, 53.3 seconds east 15.28 feet to a point 
        N108333.38, E372075.82, thence running north 62 degrees, 29 
        minutes, 42.1 seconds west 484.73 feet to the point of 
        beginning.
    (g) Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.--The project 
for navigation, Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (Public 
Law 90-483; 82 Stat. 731), is modified to provide that alteration of 
the drawspan of the Brightman Street Bridge to provide a channel width 
of 300 feet shall not be required after the date of enactment of this 
Act.
    (h) Oswegatchie River, Ogdensburg, New York.--The portion of the 
Federal channel in the Oswegatchie River in Ogdensburg, New York, from 
the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 bridge, upstream to the 
northernmost alignment of the Lake Street bridge, is deauthorized.
    (i) Kickapoo River, Wisconsin.--
            (1) Project modification.--The project for flood control 
        and allied purposes, Kickapoo River, Wisconsin, authorized by 
        section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (Public Law 87-
        874; 76 Stat. 1190), as modified by section 814 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 
        4169), is further modified as provided by this subsection.
            (2) Transfer of property.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to the requirements of 
                this paragraph, the Secretary shall transfer to the 
                State of Wisconsin, without consideration, all right, 
                title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
                lands described in subparagraph (B), including all 
                works, structures, and other improvements on the lands.
                    (B) Land description.--The lands to be transferred 
                pursuant to subparagraph (A) are the approximately 
                8,569 acres of land associated with the LaFarge Dam and 
                Lake portion of the project referred to in paragraph 
                (1) in Vernon County, Wisconsin, in the following 
                sections:
                            (i) Section 31, Township 14 North, Range 1 
                        West of the 4th Principal Meridian.
                            (ii) Sections 2 through 11, and 16, 17, 20, 
                        and 21, Township 13 North, Range 2 West of the 
                        4th Principal Meridian.
                            (iii) Sections 15, 16, 21 through 24, 26, 
                        27, 31, and 33 through 36, Township 14 North, 
                        Range 2 West of the 4th Principal Meridian.
                    (C) Terms and conditions.--The transfer under 
                subparagraph (A) shall be made on the condition that 
                the State of Wisconsin enters into a written agreement 
                with the Secretary to hold the United States harmless 
                from all claims arising from or through the operation 
                of the lands and improvements subject to the transfer.
                    (D) Deadlines.--Not later than July 1, 1996, the 
                Secretary shall transmit to the State of Wisconsin an 
                offer to make the transfer under this paragraph. The 
                offer shall provide for the transfer to be made in the 
                period beginning on November 1, 1996, and ending on 
                December 31, 1996.
                    (E) Deauthorization.--The LaFarge Dam and Lake 
                portion of the project referred to in paragraph (1) is 
                not authorized after the date of the transfer under 
                this paragraph.
                    (F) Interim management and maintenance.--The 
                Secretary shall continue to manage and maintain the 
                LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of project referred to in 
                paragraph (1) until the date of the transfer under this 
                paragraph.

SEC. 104. STUDIES.

    (a) Bear Creek Drainage, San Joaquin County, California.--The 
Secretary shall conduct a review of the Bear Creek Drainage, San 
Joaquin County, California, flood control project, authorized by 
section 10 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for 
other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 901), to develop 
a comprehensive plan for additional flood damage reduction measures for 
the city of Stockton, California, and surrounding areas.
    (b) Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California.--Not later than 18 
months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
            (1) conduct a study of the advisability of modifying, for 
        the purpose of flood control pursuant to section 205 of the 
        Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Lake Elsinore, 
        Riverside County, California, flood control project, for water 
        conservation storage up to an elevation of 1,249 feet above 
        mean sea level; and
            (2) report to Congress on the study, including making 
        recommendations concerning the advisability of so modifying the 
        project.
    (c) Long Beach, California.--The Secretary shall review the 
feasibility of navigation improvements at Long Beach Harbor, 
California, including widening and deepening of the navigation channel, 
as provided for in section 201(b) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4091). The Secretary shall 
complete the report not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act.
    (d) Mormon Slough/Calaveras River, California.--The Secretary shall 
conduct a review of the Mormon Slough/Calaveras River, California, 
flood control project, authorized by section 10 of the Act entitled 
``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers 
and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved 
December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 902), to develop a comprehensive plan for 
additional flood damage reduction measures for the city of Stockton, 
California, and surrounding areas.
    (e) Murrieta Creek, Riverside County, California.--The Secretary 
shall review the completed feasibility study of the Riverside County 
Flood Control and Water Conservation District, including identified 
alternatives, concerning Murrieta Creek from Temecula to Wildomar, 
Riverside County, California, to determine the Federal interest in 
participating in a project for flood control.
    (f) Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration, 
California.--The Secretary shall study the feasibility of fish and 
wildlife habitat improvement measures identified for further study by 
the Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration Investigation 
Reconnaissance Report.
    (g) West Dade, Florida.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in using the 
West Dade, Florida, reuse facility to increase the supply of surface 
water to the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife habitat.
    (h) Savannah River Basin Comprehensive Water Resources Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
        comprehensive study to address the current and future needs for 
        flood damage prevention and reduction, water supply, and other 
        related water resources needs in the Savannah River Basin.
            (2) Scope.--The scope of the study shall be limited to an 
        analysis of water resources issues that fall within the 
        traditional civil works missions of the Army Corps of 
        Engineers.
            (3) Coordination.--Notwithstanding paragraph (2), the 
        Secretary shall ensure that the study is coordinated with the 
        Environmental Protection Agency and the ongoing watershed study 
        by the Agency of the Savannah River Basin.
    (i) Bayou Blanc, Crowley, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in the 
construction of a bulkhead system, consisting of either steel sheet 
piling with tiebacks or concrete, along the embankment of Bayou Blanc, 
Crowley, Louisiana, in order to alleviate slope failures and erosion 
problems in a cost-effective manner.
    (j) Hackberry Industrial Ship Channel Park, Louisiana.--The 
Secretary shall incorporate the area of Hackberry, Louisiana, as part 
of the overall study of the Lake Charles ship channel, bypass channel, 
and general anchorage area in Louisiana, to explore the possibility of 
constructing additional anchorage areas.
    (k) City of North Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.--The Secretary 
shall conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest 
in channel improvements in channel A of the North Las Vegas Wash in the 
city of North Las Vegas, Nevada, for the purpose of flood control.
    (l) Lower Las Vegas Wash Wetlands, Clark County, Nevada.--The 
Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of the 
restoration of wetlands in the Lower Las Vegas Wash, Nevada, for the 
purposes of erosion control and environmental restoration.
    (m) Northern Nevada.--The Secretary shall conduct reconnaissance 
studies, in the State of Nevada, of--
            (1) the Humboldt River, and the tributaries and outlets of 
        the river;
            (2) the Truckee River, and the tributaries and outlets of 
        the river;
            (3) the Carson River, and the tributaries and outlets of 
        the river; and
            (4) the Walker River, and the tributaries and outlets of 
        the river;
in order to determine the Federal interest in flood control, 
environmental restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife, 
recreation, water conservation, water quality, and toxic and 
radioactive waste.
    (n) Buffalo Harbor, New York.--The Secretary shall determine the 
feasibility of excavating the inner harbor and constructing the 
associated bulkheads in Buffalo Harbor, New York.
    (o) Coeymans, New York.--The Secretary shall conduct a 
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in reopening the 
secondary channel of the Hudson River in the town of Coeymans, New 
York, which has been narrowed by silt as a result of the construction 
of Coeymans middle dike by the Army Corps of Engineers.
    (p) Shinnecock Inlet, New York.--Not later than 2 years after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall conduct a 
reconnaissance study in Shinnecock Inlet, New York, to determine the 
Federal interest in constructing a sand bypass system, or other 
appropriate alternative, for the purposes of allowing sand to flow in 
the natural east-to-west pattern of the sand and preventing the further 
erosion of the beaches west of the inlet and the shoaling of the inlet.
    (q) Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, New York and New 
Jersey.--The Secretary shall continue engineering and design in order 
to complete the navigation project at Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay 
Channels, New York and New Jersey, authorized to be constructed in the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 99-88; 99 Stat. 313), 
and section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4095), described in the general design 
memorandum for the project, and approved in the Report of the Chief of 
Engineers dated December 14, 1981.
    (r) Columbia Slough, Oregon.--Not later than 2 years after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete a feasibility 
study for the ecosystem restoration project at Columbia Slough, Oregon, 
as reported in the August 1993 Revised Reconnaissance Study. The study 
shall be a demonstration study done in coordination with the 
Environmental Protection Agency.
    (s) Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota.--The Secretary shall--
            (1) conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
        sediment removal and control in the area of the Missouri River 
        downstream of Oahe Dam through the upper reaches of Lake 
        Sharpe, including the lower portion of the Bad River, South 
        Dakota; and
            (2) develop a comprehensive sediment removal and control 
        plan for the area--
                    (A) based on the assessment by the study of the 
                dredging, estimated costs, and time required to remove 
                sediment from affected areas in Lake Sharpe;
                    (B)(i) based on the identification by the study of 
                high erosion areas in the Bad River channel; and
                    (ii) including recommendations and related costs 
                for such of the areas as are in need of stabilization 
                and restoration; and
                    (C)(i) based on the identification by the study of 
                shoreline erosion areas along Lake Sharpe; and
                    (ii) including recommended options for the 
                stabilization and restoration of the areas.
    (t) Ashley Creek, Utah.--The Secretary is authorized to study the 
feasibility of undertaking a project for fish and wildlife restoration 
at Ashley Creek, near Vernal, Utah.

                  TITLE II--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. HEBER SPRINGS, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement with 
the city of Heber Springs, Arkansas, to provide 3,522 acre-feet of 
water supply storage in Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas, for municipal and 
industrial purposes, at no cost to the city.
    (b) Necessary Facilities.--The city of Heber Springs shall be 
responsible for 100 percent of the costs of construction, operation, 
and maintenance of any intake, transmission, treatment, or distribution 
facility necessary for utilization of the water supply.
    (c) Additional Water Supply Storage.--Any additional water supply 
storage required after the date of enactment of this Act shall be 
contracted for and reimbursed by the city of Heber Springs, Arkansas.

SEC. 202. MORGAN POINT, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall accept as in-kind contributions for the project 
at Morgan Point, Arkansas--
            (1) the items described as fish and wildlife facilities and 
        land in the Morgan Point Broadway Closure Structure 
        modification report for the project, dated February 1994; and
            (2) fish stocking activities carried out by the non-Federal 
        interests for the project.

SEC. 203. WHITE RIVER BASIN LAKES, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control and power generation at White River 
Basin Lakes, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 4 of the Act 
entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works 
on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', 
approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218), shall include recreation and 
fish and wildlife mitigation as purposes of the project, to the extent 
that the purposes do not adversely impact flood control, power 
generation, or other authorized purposes of the project.

SEC. 204. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA.

    The project for Central and Southern Florida, authorized by section 
203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82 Stat. 740), 
is modified, subject to the availability of appropriations, to 
authorize the Secretary to implement the recommended plan of 
improvement contained in a report entitled ``Central and Southern 
Florida Project, Final Integrated General Reevaluation Report and 
Environmental Impact Statement, Canal 111 (C-111), South Dade County, 
Florida'', dated May 1994 (including acquisition of such portions of 
the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project), at 
a total cost of $121,000,000. The Federal share of the cost of 
implementing the plan of improvement shall be 50 percent. The Secretary 
of the Interior shall pay 25 percent of the cost of acquiring such 
portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the 
project, which amount shall be included in the Federal share. The non-
Federal share of the operation and maintenance costs of the 
improvements undertaken pursuant to this section shall be 100 percent, 
except that the Federal Government shall reimburse the non-Federal 
interest in an amount equal to 60 percent of the costs of operating and 
maintaining pump stations that pump water into Taylor Slough in 
Everglades National Park.

SEC. 205. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA.

    The project for flood protection of West Palm Beach, Florida (C-
51), authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (Public 
Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1183), is modified to provide for the construction 
of an enlarged stormwater detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1 
East, generally in accordance with the plan of improvements described 
in the February 15, 1994, report entitled ``Everglades Protection 
Project, Palm Beach County, Florida, Conceptual Design'', prepared by 
Burns and McDonnell, and as further described in detailed design 
documents to be approved by the Secretary. The additional work 
authorized by this section shall be accomplished at full Federal cost 
in recognition of the water supply benefits accruing to the Loxahatchee 
National Wildlife Refuge and the Everglades National Park and in 
recognition of the statement in support of the Everglades restoration 
effort set forth in the document signed by the Secretary of the 
Interior and the Secretary in July 1993. Operation and maintenance of 
the stormwater detention area shall be consistent with regulations 
prescribed by the Secretary for the Central and Southern Florida 
project, with all costs of the operation and maintenance work borne by 
non-Federal interests.

SEC. 206. PERIODIC MAINTENANCE DREDGING FOR GREENVILLE INNER HARBOR 
              CHANNEL, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Greenville Inner Harbor Channel, Mississippi, is deemed to be a 
portion of the navigable waters of the United States, and shall be 
included among the navigable waters for which the Army Corps of 
Engineers maintains a 10-foot navigable channel. The navigable channel 
for the Greenville Inner Harbor Channel shall be maintained in a manner 
that is consistent with the navigable channel to the Greenville Harbor 
and the portion of the Mississippi River adjacent to the Greenville 
Harbor that is maintained by the Army Corps of Engineers, as in 
existence on the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 207. SARDIS LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall work cooperatively with the State of 
Mississippi and the city of Sardis to the maximum extent practicable in 
the management of existing and proposed leases of land consistent with 
the master tourism and recreational plan for the economic development 
of the Sardis Lake area prepared by the city.

SEC. 208. LIBBY DAM, MONTANA.

    (a) In General.--In accordance with section 103(c)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)(1)), the Secretary 
shall--
            (1) complete the construction and installation of 
        generating units 6 through 8 at Libby Dam, Montana; and
            (2) remove the partially constructed haul bridge over the 
        Kootenai River, Montana.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $16,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 209. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, MALTA, MONTANA.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary is authorized to expend such Federal funds as are necessary 
to complete the small flood control project begun at Malta, Montana, 
pursuant to section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 
701s).

SEC. 210. CLIFFWOOD BEACH, NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or the 
status of the project authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control 
Act of 1962 (Public Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1180) for hurricane-flood 
protection and beach erosion control on Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, 
New Jersey, the Secretary shall undertake a project to provide periodic 
beach nourishment for Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey, for a 50-year period 
beginning on the date of execution of a project cooperation agreement 
by the Secretary and an appropriate non-Federal interest.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project authorized by this section shall be 35 percent.

SEC. 211. FIRE ISLAND INLET, NEW YORK.

    For the purpose of replenishing the beach, the Secretary shall 
place sand dredged from the Fire Island Inlet on the shoreline between 
Gilgo State Park and Tobay Beach to protect Ocean Parkway along the 
Atlantic Ocean shoreline in Suffolk County, New York.

SEC. 212. BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, NORTH DAKOTA AND MONTANA.

    (a) Acquisition of Easements.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall acquire, from willing 
        sellers, permanent flowage and saturation easements over--
                    (A) the land in Williams County, North Dakota, 
                extending from the riverward margin of the Buford 
                Trenton Irrigation District main canal to the north 
                bank of the Missouri River, beginning at the Buford 
                Trenton Irrigation District pumping station located in 
                the NE\1/4\ of section 17, T-152-N, R-104-W, and 
                continuing northeasterly downstream to the land 
                referred to as the East Bottom; and
                    (B) any other land outside the boundaries of the 
                Buford Trenton Irrigation District described in 
                subparagraph (A) that has been affected by rising 
                ground water and surface flooding.
            (2) Scope.--The easements acquired by the Secretary under 
        paragraph (1) shall include the right, power, and privilege of 
        the Federal Government to submerge, overflow, percolate, and 
        saturate the surface and subsurface of the lands and such other 
        terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate.
            (3) Payment.--In acquiring the easements under paragraph 
        (1), the Secretary shall pay an amount based on the unaffected 
        fee value of the lands subject to the easements. For the 
        purpose of this paragraph, the unaffected fee value of the 
        lands is the value of the lands prior to being affected by 
        rising ground water and surface flooding.
    (b) Conveyance of Drainage Pumps.--Notwithstanding any other law, 
the Secretary may--
            (1) convey to the Buford Trenton Irrigation District all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in the drainage 
        pumps located within the boundaries of the District; and
            (2) may provide a lump sum payment of $60,000 for power 
        requirements associated with the operation of the drainage 
        pumps.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $34,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 213. WISTER LAKE PROJECT, LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.

    The Secretary shall maintain a minimum conservation pool level of 
478 feet at the Wister Lake project in LeFlore County, Oklahoma, 
authorized by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood 
control, and for other purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 
1218). Notwithstanding title I of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) or any other provision of law, any 
increase in water supply yield that results from the pool level of 478 
feet shall be treated as unallocated water supply until such time as a 
user enters into a contract for the supply under such applicable laws 
concerning cost-sharing as are in effect on the date of the contract.

SEC. 214. WILLAMETTE RIVER, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, OREGON.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to control the 
water temperature in the Willamette River, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon, 
to mitigate the negative impacts on fish and wildlife resulting from 
the operation of the Blue River and Cougar Lake projects, McKenzie 
River Basin, Oregon. The cost of the facilities shall be repaid 
according to the allocations among the purposes of the original 
projects.

SEC. 215. ABANDONED AND WRECKED BARGE REMOVAL, RHODE ISLAND.

    Section 361 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public 
Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4861) is amended by striking subsection (a) and 
inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--In order to alleviate a hazard to navigation and 
recreational activity, the Secretary shall remove a sunken barge from 
waters off the shore of the Narragansett Town Beach in Narragansett, 
Rhode Island, at a total cost of $1,900,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $1,425,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of $475,000. The 
Secretary shall not remove the barge until title to the barge has been 
transferred to the United States or the non-Federal interest. The 
transfer of title shall be carried out at no cost to the United 
States.''.

SEC. 216. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall incorporate a channel extending from the 
vicinity of the Fox Point hurricane barrier to the vicinity of the 
Francis Street bridge in Providence, Rhode Island, into the navigation 
project for Providence River and Harbor, Rhode Island, authorized by 
section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 
Stat. 1089). The channel shall have a depth of up to 10 feet and a 
width of approximately 120 feet and shall be approximately 1.25 miles 
in length.

SEC. 217. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TEXAS.

    (a) Acceptance of Lands.--The Secretary is authorized to accept 
from a non-Federal interest additional lands of not to exceed 300 acres 
that--
            (1) are contiguous to the Cooper Lake and Channels Project, 
        Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 
        1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 1091) and section 601(a) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 
        100 Stat. 4145); and
            (2) provide habitat value at least equal to the habitat 
        value provided by the lands authorized to be redesignated under 
        subsection (b).
    (b) Redesignation of Lands to Recreation Purposes.--Upon the 
acceptance of lands under subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized 
to redesignate mitigation lands of not to exceed 300 acres to 
recreation purposes.
    (c) Funding.--The cost of all work under this section, including 
real estate appraisals, cultural and environmental surveys, and all 
development necessary to avoid net mitigation losses, to the extent 
required, shall be borne by the non-Federal interest.

SEC. 218. RUDEE INLET, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    Notwithstanding the limitation set forth in section 107(b) of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(b)), Federal participation 
in the maintenance of the Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia, 
project shall continue for the life of the project. Nothing in this 
section shall alter or modify the non-Federal cost sharing 
responsibility as specified in the Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, 
Virginia Detailed Project Report, dated October 1983.

SEC. 219. VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    Notwithstanding any other law, the non-Federal share of the costs 
of the project for beach erosion control and hurricane protection, 
Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4136), 
shall be reduced by $3,120,803, or by such amount as is determined by 
an audit carried out by the Department of the Army to be due to the 
city of Virginia Beach as reimbursement for beach nourishment 
activities carried out by the city between October 1, 1986, and 
September 30, 1993, if the Federal Government has not reimbursed the 
city for the activities prior to the date on which a project 
cooperation agreement is executed for the project.

                     TITLE III--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. COST-SHARING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.

    Section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213(c)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) environmental protection and restoration: 25 
        percent.''.

SEC. 302. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.

    Section 7 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 
2313) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (e);
            (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Temporary Protection of Technology.--
            ``(1) Pre-agreement.--If the Secretary determines that 
        information developed as a result of a research or development 
        activity conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers is likely to 
        be subject to a cooperative research and development agreement 
        within 2 years after the development of the information, and 
        that the information would be a trade secret or commercial or 
        financial information that would be privileged or confidential 
        if the information had been obtained from a non-Federal party 
        participating in a cooperative research and development 
        agreement under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology 
        Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a), the Secretary may 
        provide appropriate protections against the dissemination of 
        the information, including exemption from subchapter II of 
        chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, until the earlier 
        of--
                    ``(A) the date on which the Secretary enters into 
                such an agreement with respect to the information; or
                    ``(B) the last day of the 2-year period beginning 
                on the date of the determination.
            ``(2) Post-agreement.--Any information subject to paragraph 
        (1) that becomes the subject of a cooperative research and 
        development agreement shall be subject to the protections 
        provided under section 12(c)(7)(B) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 
        3710a(c)(7)(B)) as if the information had been developed under 
        a cooperative research and development agreement.''.

SEC. 303. NATIONAL INVENTORY OF DAMS.

    Section 13 of Public Law 92-367 (33 U.S.C. 467l) is amended by 
striking the second sentence and inserting the following: ``There are 
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $500,000 for 
each fiscal year.''.

SEC. 304. HYDROELECTRIC POWER PROJECT UPRATING.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out the maintenance, rehabilitation, 
and modernization of a hydroelectric power generating facility at a 
water resources project under the jurisdiction of the Department of the 
Army, the Secretary is authorized to take such actions as are necessary 
to increase the efficiency of energy production or the capacity of the 
facility, or both, if, after consulting with the heads of other 
appropriate Federal and State agencies, the Secretary determines that 
the increase--
            (1) is economically justified and financially feasible;
            (2) will not result in any significant adverse effect on 
        the other purposes for which the project is authorized;
            (3) will not result in significant adverse environmental 
        impacts; and
            (4) will not involve major structural or operational 
        changes in the project.
    (b) Effect on Other Authority.--This section shall not affect the 
authority of the Secretary and the Administrator of the Bonneville 
Power Administration under section 2406 of the Energy Policy Act of 
1992 (16 U.S.C. 839d-1).

SEC. 305. FEDERAL LUMP-SUM PAYMENTS FOR FEDERAL OPERATION AND 
              MAINTENANCE COSTS.

    (a) In General.--In the case of a water resources project under the 
jurisdiction of the Department of the Army for which the non-Federal 
interests are responsible for performing the operation, maintenance, 
replacement, and rehabilitation of the project, or a separable element 
(as defined in section 103(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(f)) of the project, and for which the Federal 
Government is responsible for paying a portion of the operation, 
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation costs of the project or 
separable element, the Secretary may make, in accordance with this 
section and under terms and conditions acceptable to the Secretary, a 
payment of the estimated total Federal share of the costs to the non-
Federal interests after completion of construction of the project or 
separable element.
    (b) Amount of Payment.--The amount that may be paid by the 
Secretary under subsection (a) shall be equal to the present value of 
the Federal payments over the life of the project, as estimated by the 
Federal Government, and shall be computed using an interest rate 
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury taking into consideration 
current market yields on outstanding marketable obligations of the 
United States with maturities comparable to the remaining life of the 
project.
    (c) Agreement.--The Secretary may make a payment under this section 
only if the non-Federal interests have entered into a binding agreement 
with the Secretary to perform the operation, maintenance, replacement, 
and rehabilitation of the project or separable element. The agreement 
shall--
            (1) meet the requirements of section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b); and
            (2) specify--
                    (A) the terms and conditions under which a payment 
                may be made under this section; and
                    (B) the rights of, and remedies available to, the 
                Federal Government to recover all or a portion of a 
                payment made under this section if a non-Federal 
                interest suspends or terminates the performance by the 
                non-Federal interest of the operation, maintenance, 
                replacement, and rehabilitation of the project or 
                separable element, or fails to perform the activities 
                in a manner that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (d) Effect of Payment.--Except as provided in subsection (c), a 
payment provided to the non-Federal interests under this section shall 
relieve the Federal Government of any obligation, after the date of the 
payment, to pay any of the operation, maintenance, replacement, or 
rehabilitation costs for the project or separable element.

SEC. 306. COST-SHARING FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING PROJECT FEATURES.

    After the date of enactment of this Act, any proposal submitted to 
Congress by the Secretary for modification of an existing authorized 
water resources development project (in existence on the date of the 
proposal) by removal of one or more of the project features that would 
significantly and adversely impact the authorized project purposes or 
outputs shall include the recommendation that the non-Federal interests 
shall provide 50 percent of the cost of any such modification, 
including the cost of acquiring any additional interests in lands that 
become necessary for accomplishing the modification.

SEC. 307. TERMINATION OF TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE.

    Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 2319) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a); and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``(b) Public Participation.--''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``subsection'' each place it 
                appears and inserting ``section''.

SEC. 308. CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``10'' and inserting 
        ``5'';
            (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Before'' and 
        inserting ``Upon official''; and
            (3) in the last sentence, by inserting ``the planning, 
        design, or'' before ``construction''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 52 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-676; 102 Stat. 4044) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a) (33 U.S.C. 579a note);
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as 
        subsections (a) through (d), respectively; and
            (3) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated), by striking 
        ``or subsection (a) of this section''.

SEC. 309. PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC 
              CONFERENCES.

    Section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (33 U.S.C. 701u) is 
repealed.

SEC. 310. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--In carrying out research and development in 
support of the civil works program of the Department of the Army, the 
Secretary may utilize contracts, cooperative research and development 
agreements, and cooperative agreements with, and grants to, non-Federal 
entities, including State and local governments, colleges and 
universities, consortia, professional and technical societies, public 
and private scientific and technical foundations, research 
institutions, educational organizations, and nonprofit organizations.
    (b) Commercial Application.--In the case of a contract for research 
or development, or both, the Secretary may--
            (1) require that the research or development, or both, have 
        potential commercial application; and
            (2) use the potential for commercial application as an 
        evaluation factor, if appropriate.

SEC. 311. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities in support 
of other Federal agencies or international organizations to address 
problems of national significance to the United States. The Secretary 
may engage in activities in support of international organizations only 
after consulting with the Secretary of State. The Secretary may use the 
technical and managerial expertise of the Army Corps of Engineers to 
address domestic and international problems related to water resources, 
infrastructure development, and environmental protection.
    (b) Funding.--There are authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to 
carry out this section. The Secretary may accept and expend additional 
funds from other Federal agencies or international organizations to 
carry this section.

SEC. 312. SECTION 1135 PROGRAM.

    (a) Expansion of Program.--Section 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the period at 
        the end the following: ``and to determine if the operation of 
        the projects has contributed to the degradation of the quality 
        of the environment'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking the last two sentences;
            (3) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as 
        subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and
            (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Measures To Restore Environmental Quality.--If the Secretary 
determines under subsection (a) that operation of a water resources 
project has contributed to the degradation of the quality of the 
environment, the Secretary may carry out, with respect to the project, 
measures for the restoration of environmental quality, if the measures 
are feasible and consistent with the authorized purposes of the 
project.
    ``(d) Funding.--The non-Federal share of the cost of any 
modification or measure carried out pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) 
shall be 25 percent. Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may be 
expended on any 1 such modification or measure.''.
    (b) Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration, 
California.--In accordance with section 1135(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(b)), the Secretary shall carry 
out the construction of a turbine bypass at Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, 
California.
    (c) Lower Amazon Creek Restoration, Oregon.--In accordance with 
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2309a), the Secretary may carry out justified environmental restoration 
measures with respect to the flood reduction measures constructed by 
the Army Corps of Engineers, and the related flood reduction measures 
constructed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, in the 
Amazon Creek drainage. The Federal share of the restoration measures 
shall be jointly funded by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Natural 
Resources Conservation Service in proportion to the share required to 
be paid by each agency of the original costs of the flood reduction 
measures.

SEC. 313. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public 
Law 101-640; 33 U.S.C. 1252 note) is amended by striking subsection 
(f).

SEC. 314. FEASIBILITY STUDIES.

    (a) Non-Federal Share.--Section 105(a)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``during the period 
        of such study'';
            (2) by inserting after the first sentence the following: 
        ``During the period of the study, the non-Federal share of the 
        cost of the study shall be not more than 50 percent of the 
        estimate of the cost of the study as contained in the 
        feasibility cost sharing agreement. The cost estimate may be 
        amended only by mutual agreement of the Secretary and the non-
        Federal interests. The non-Federal share of any costs in excess 
        of the cost estimate shall, except as otherwise mutually agreed 
        by the Secretary and the non-Federal interests, be payable 
        after the project has been authorized for construction and on 
        the date on which the Secretary and non-Federal interests enter 
        into an agreement pursuant to section 101(e) or 103(j).''; and
            (3) in the last sentence, by striking ``such non-Federal 
        contribution'' and inserting ``the non-Federal share required 
        under this paragraph''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply notwithstanding any feasibility cost sharing agreement entered 
into by the Secretary and non-Federal interests, and the Secretary 
shall amend any feasibility cost sharing agreements in effect on the 
date of enactment of this Act so as to conform the agreements with the 
amendments. Nothing in this section or any amendment made by this 
section shall require the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal 
interests for funds previously contributed for a study.

SEC. 315. OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Penalty.--Section 16 of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
approved March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 411), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``sections thirteen, fourteen, and 
        fifteen'' and inserting ``section 13, 14, 15, 19, or 20''; and
            (2) by striking ``not exceeding twenty-five hundred dollars 
        nor less than five hundred dollars'' and inserting ``of not 
        more than $25,000 for each day that the violation continues''.
    (b) General Authority.--Section 20 of the Act (33 U.S.C. 415) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``Under emergency'' and inserting 
                ``Summary Removal Procedures.--Under emergency''; and
                    (B) by striking ``expense'' the first place it 
                appears and inserting ``actual expense, including 
                administrative expenses,'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``cost'' and inserting ``actual 
                cost, including administrative costs,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``(b) The'' and inserting ``(c) 
                Liability of Owner, Lessee, or Operator.--The''; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Removal Requirement.--Not later than 24 hours after the 
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating 
issues an order to stop or delay navigation in any navigable waters of 
the United States because of conditions related to the sinking or 
grounding of a vessel, the owner or operator of the vessel, with the 
approval of the Secretary of the Army, shall begin removal of the 
vessel using the most expeditious removal method available or, if 
appropriate, secure the vessel pending removal to allow navigation to 
resume. If the owner or operator fails to begin removal or to secure 
the vessel pending removal in accordance with the preceding sentence or 
fails to complete removal as soon as possible, the Secretary of the 
Army shall remove or destroy the vessel using the summary removal 
procedures under subsection (a).''.

SEC. 316. LEVEE OWNERS MANUAL.

    Section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction 
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and 
for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Levee Owners Manual.--
            ``(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this subsection, in accordance with chapter 5 of 
        title 5, United States Code, the Secretary shall prepare a 
        manual describing the maintenance and upkeep responsibilities 
        that the Army Corps of Engineers requires of a non-Federal 
        interest in order for the non-Federal interest to receive 
        Federal assistance under this section. The Secretary shall 
        provide a copy of the manual at no cost to each non-Federal 
        interest that is eligible to receive Federal assistance under 
        this section.
            ``(2) Prohibition on delegation.--The preparation of the 
        manual shall be carried out under the personal direction of the 
        Secretary.
            ``(3) Authorization of appropriations.--There are 
        authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out this 
        subsection.
            ``(4) Definitions.--In this subsection:
                    ``(A) Maintenance and upkeep.--The term 
                `maintenance and upkeep' means all maintenance and 
                general upkeep of a levee performed on a regular and 
                consistent basis that is not repair and rehabilitation.
                    ``(B) Repair and rehabilitation.--The term `repair 
                and rehabilitation'--
                            ``(i) except as provided in clause (ii), 
                        means the repair or rebuilding of a levee or 
                        other flood control structure, after the 
                        structure has been damaged by a flood, to the 
                        level of protection provided by the structure 
                        before the flood; and
                            ``(ii) does not include--
                                    ``(I) any improvement to the 
                                structure; or
                                    ``(II) repair or rebuilding 
                                described in clause (i) if, in the 
                                normal course of usage, the structure 
                                becomes structurally unsound and is no 
                                longer fit to provide the level of 
                                protection for which the structure was 
                                designed.
                    ``(C) Secretary.--The term `Secretary' means the 
                Secretary of the Army.''.

SEC. 317. RISK-BASED ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall obtain the services of an independent 
consultant to evaluate--
            (1) the relationship between--
                    (A) the Risk-Based Analysis for Evaluation of 
                Hydrology/Hydraulics and Economics in Flood Damage 
                Reduction Studies established in an Army Corps of 
                Engineers engineering circular; and
                    (B) minimum engineering and safety standards;
            (2) the validity of results generated by the studies 
        described in paragraph (1); and
            (3) policy impacts related to change in the studies 
        described in paragraph (1).
    (b) Task Force.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out the independent evaluation 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary, not later than 90 days 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, shall establish a task 
        force to oversee and review the analysis.
            (2) Membership.--The task force shall consist of--
                    (A) the Assistant Secretary of the Army having 
                responsibility for civil works, who shall serve as 
                chairperson of the task force;
                    (B) the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
                Management Agency;
                    (C) the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation 
                Service of the Department of Agriculture;
                    (D) a State representative appointed by the 
                Secretary from among individuals recommended by the 
                Association of State Floodplain Managers;
                    (E) a local government public works official 
                appointed by the Secretary from among individuals 
                recommended by a national organization representing 
                public works officials; and
                    (F) an individual from the private sector, who 
                shall be appointed by the Secretary.
            (3) Compensation.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph 
                (B), a member of the task force shall serve without 
                compensation.
                    (B) Expenses.--Each member of the task force shall 
                be allowed--
                            (i) travel expenses, including per diem in 
                        lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for 
                        employees of agencies under subchapter I of 
                        chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code, 
                        while away from the home or regular place of 
                        business of the member in the performance of 
                        services for the task force; and
                            (ii) other expenses incurred in the 
                        performance of services for the task force, as 
                        determined by the Secretary.
            (4) Termination.--The task force shall terminate 2 years 
        after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Limitation on Use of Methodology.--During the period beginning 
on the date of enactment of this Act and ending 2 years after that 
date, if requested by a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall 
refrain from using any risk-based technique required under the studies 
described in subsection (a) for the evaluation and design of a project 
carried out in cooperation with the non-Federal interest unless the 
Secretary, in consultation with the task force, has provided direction 
for use of the technique after consideration of the independent 
evaluation required under subsection (a).
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $500,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 318. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

    Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public 
Law 102-580; 33 U.S.C. 2239 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the 
                following: ``The goal of the program shall be to make 
                possible the development, on an operational scale, of 1 
                or more sediment decontamination technologies, each of 
                which demonstrates a sediment decontamination capacity 
                of at least 2,500 cubic yards per day.''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Report to congress.--Not later than September 30, 
        1996, and September 30 of each year thereafter, the 
        Administrator and the Secretary shall report to Congress on 
        progress made toward the goal described in paragraph (2).''; 
        and
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$10,000,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``1992'' and inserting ``1996''.

SEC. 319. MELALEUCA TREE.

    Section 104(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 
610(a)) is amended by inserting ``melaleuca tree,'' after ``milfoil,''.

SEC. 320. FAULKNER ISLAND, CONNECTICUT.

    In consultation with the Director of the United States Fish and 
Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall design and construct shoreline 
protection measures for the coastline adjacent to the Faulkner Island 
Lighthouse, Connecticut, at a total cost of $4,500,000.

SEC. 321. DESIGNATION OF LOCK AND DAM AT THE RED RIVER WATERWAY, 
              LOUISIANA.

    (a) Designation.--Lock and Dam numbered 4 of the Red River 
Waterway, Louisiana, is designated as the ``Russell B. Long Lock and 
Dam''.
    (b) Legal References.--A reference in any law, regulation, 
document, map, record, or other paper of the United States to the lock 
and dam referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the ``Russell B. Long Lock and Dam''.

SEC. 322. JURISDICTION OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION, LOUISIANA.

    The jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Commission established by 
the Act of June 28, 1879 (21 Stat. 37, chapter 43; 33 U.S.C. 641 et 
seq.), is extended to include all of the area between the eastern side 
of the Bayou Lafourche Ridge from Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the 
Gulf of Mexico and the west guide levee of the Mississippi River from 
Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico.

SEC. 323. WILLIAM JENNINGS RANDOLPH ACCESS ROAD, GARRETT COUNTY, 
              MARYLAND.

    The Secretary shall transfer up to $600,000 from the funds 
appropriated for the William Jennings Randolph Lake, Maryland and West 
Virginia, project to the State of Maryland for use by the State in 
constructing an access road to the William Jennings Randolph Lake in 
Garrett County, Maryland.

SEC. 324. ARKABUTLA DAM AND LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.

    The Secretary shall repair the access roads to Arkabutla Dam and 
Arkabutla Lake in Tate County and DeSoto County, Mississippi, at a 
total cost of not to exceed $1,400,000.

SEC. 325. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--In order to make capital improvements to the New 
York State canal system, the Secretary, with the consent of appropriate 
local and State entities, shall enter into such arrangements, 
contracts, and leases with public and private entities as may be 
necessary for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation, preservation, 
and maintenance of the New York State canal system and related 
facilities, including trailside facilities and other recreational 
projects along the waterways referred to in subsection (c).
    (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of capital 
improvements under this section shall be 50 percent. The total cost is 
$14,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $7,000,000.
    (c) Definition of New York State Canal System.--In this section, 
the term ``New York State canal system'' means the Erie, Oswego, 
Champlain, and Cayuga-Seneca Canals in New York.

SEC. 326. QUONSET POINT-DAVISVILLE, RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary shall replace the bulkhead between piers 1 and 2 at 
the Quonset Point-Davisville Industrial Park, Rhode Island, at a total 
cost of $1,350,000. The estimated Federal share of the project cost is 
$1,012,500, and the estimated non-Federal share of the project cost is 
$337,500. In conjunction with this project, the Secretary shall install 
high mast lighting at pier 2 at a total cost of $300,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $225,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$75,000.

SEC. 327. CLOUTER CREEK DISPOSAL AREA, CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--Notwithstanding any 
other law, the Secretary of the Navy shall transfer to the Secretary 
administrative jurisdiction over the approximately 1,400 acres of land 
under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy that comprise a 
portion of the Clouter Creek disposal area, Charleston, South Carolina.
    (b) Use of Transferred Land.--The land transferred under subsection 
(a) shall be used by the Department of the Army as a dredge material 
disposal area for dredging activities in the vicinity of Charleston, 
South Carolina, including the Charleston Harbor navigation project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section modifies any non-Federal 
cost-sharing requirement established under title I of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).

SEC. 328. NUISANCE AQUATIC VEGETATION IN LAKE GASTON, VIRGINIA AND 
              NORTH CAROLINA.

    Section 339(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4855) is amended by striking ``1993 and 
1994'' and inserting ``1995 and 1996''.

SEC. 329. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT.

    (a) Authorizations.--
            (1) Authorization of modernization.--Subject to approval 
        in, and in such amounts as may be provided in appropriations 
        Acts, the Chief of Engineers of the Army Corps of Engineers is 
        authorized to modernize the Washington Aqueduct.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to the Army Corps of Engineers borrowing 
        authority in amounts sufficient to cover the full costs of 
        modernizing the Washington Aqueduct. The borrowing authority 
        shall be provided by the Secretary of the Treasury, under such 
        terms and conditions as are established by the Secretary of the 
        Treasury, after a series of contracts with each public water 
        supply customer has been entered into under subsection (b).
    (b) Contracts With Public Water Supply Customers.--
            (1) Contracts to repay corps debt.--To the extent provided 
        in appropriations Acts, and in accordance with paragraphs (2) 
        and (3), the Chief of Engineers of the Army Corps of Engineers 
        is authorized to enter into a series of contracts with each 
        public water supply customer under which the customer commits 
        to repay a pro-rata share of the principal and interest owed by 
        the Army Corps of Engineers to the Secretary of the Treasury 
        under subsection (a). Under each of the contracts, the customer 
        that enters into the contract shall commit to pay any 
        additional amount necessary to fully offset the risk of default 
        on the contract.
            (2) Offsetting of risk of default.--Each contract under 
        paragraph (1) shall include such additional terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary of the Treasury may require so that 
        the value to the Government of the contracts is estimated to be 
        equal to the obligational authority used by the Army Corps of 
Engineers for modernizing the Washington Aqueduct at the time that each 
series of contracts is entered into.
            (3) Other conditions.--Each contract entered into under 
        paragraph (1) shall--
                    (A) provide that the public water supply customer 
                pledges future income from fees assessed to operate and 
                maintain the Washington Aqueduct;
                    (B) provide the United States priority over all 
                other creditors; and
                    (C) include other conditions that the Secretary of 
                the Treasury determines to be appropriate.
    (c) Borrowing Authority.--Subject to an appropriation under 
subsection (a)(2) and after entering into a series of contracts under 
subsection (b), the Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers of 
the Army Corps of Engineers, shall seek borrowing authority from the 
Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (a)(2).
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Public water supply customer.--The term ``public water 
        supply customer'' means the District of Columbia, the county of 
        Arlington, Virginia, and the city of Falls Church, Virginia.
            (2) Value to the government.--The term ``value to the 
        Government'' means the net present value of a contract under 
        subsection (b) calculated under the rules set forth in 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 502(5) of the 
        Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)), excluding 
        section 502(5)(B)(i) of the Act, as though the contracts 
        provided for the repayment of direct loans to the public water 
        supply customers.
            (3) Washington aqueduct.--The term ``Washington Aqueduct'' 
        means the water supply system of treatment plans, raw water 
        intakes, conduits, reservoirs, transmission mains, and pumping 
        stations owned by the Federal Government located in the 
        metropolitan Washington, District of Columbia, area.

SEC. 330. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Establishment.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot 
        program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal 
        interests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
            (2) Form.--The assistance shall be in the form of design 
        and construction assistance for water-related environmental 
        infrastructure and resource protection and development projects 
        affecting the Chesapeake Bay estuary, including projects for 
        sediment and erosion control, protection of eroding shorelines, 
        protection of essential public works, wastewater treatment and 
        related facilities, water supply and related facilities, and 
        beneficial uses of dredged material, and other related projects 
        that may enhance the living resources of the estuary.
    (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned, and will be publicly operated and maintained.
    (c) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
            (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
        section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
        agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
        construction of the project to be carried out with the 
        assistance.
            (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
        into under this subsection shall provide for--
                    (A) the development by the Secretary, in 
                consultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local 
                officials, of a facilities or resource protection and 
                development plan, including appropriate engineering 
                plans and specifications and an estimate of expected 
                resource benefits; and
                    (B) the establishment of such legal and 
                institutional structures as are necessary to ensure the 
                effective long-term operation and maintenance of the 
                project by the non-Federal interest.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Federal share.--Except as provided in paragraph (2)(B), 
        the Federal share of the total project costs of each local 
        cooperation agreement entered into under this section shall be 
        75 percent.
            (2) Non-federal share.--
                    (A) Value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and 
                relocations.--In determining the non-Federal 
                contribution toward carrying out a local cooperation 
                agreement entered into under this section, the 
                Secretary shall provide credit to a non-Federal 
                interest for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-
                way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal 
                interest, except that the amount of credit provided for 
                a project under this paragraph may not exceed 25 
                percent of the total project costs.
                    (B) Operation and maintenance costs.--The non-
                Federal share of the costs of operation and maintenance 
                of carrying out the agreement under this section shall 
                be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws and Agreements.--
            (1) In general.--Nothing in this section waives, limits, or 
        otherwise affects the applicability of any provision of Federal 
        or State law that would otherwise apply to a project carried 
        out with assistance provided under this section.
            (2) Cooperation.--In carrying out this section, the 
        Secretary shall cooperate fully with the heads of appropriate 
        Federal agencies, including--
                    (A) the Administrator of the Environmental 
                Protection Agency;
                    (B) the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the 
                Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 
                Administration;
                    (C) the Secretary of the Interior, acting through 
                the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
                Service; and
                    (D) the heads of such other Federal agencies and 
                agencies of a State or political subdivision of a State 
                as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
    (f) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary shall establish at least 
1 project under this section in each of the States of Maryland, 
Virginia, and Pennsylvania. A project established under this section 
shall be carried out using such measures as are necessary to protect 
environmental, historic, and cultural resources.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, together with a recommendation concerning whether 
or not the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.

SEC. 331. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO IMPROVE SALMON SURVIVAL.

    (a) Salmon Survival Activities.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall accelerate ongoing 
        research and development activities, and is authorized to carry 
        out or participate in additional research and development 
        activities, for the purpose of developing innovative methods 
        and technologies for improving the survival of salmon, 
        especially salmon in the Columbia River Basin.
            (2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated research and 
        development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include 
        research and development related to--
                    (A) impacts from water resources projects and other 
                impacts on salmon life cycles;
                    (B) juvenile and adult salmon passage;
                    (C) light and sound guidance systems;
                    (D) surface-oriented collector systems;
                    (E) transportation mechanisms; and
                    (F) dissolved gas monitoring and abatement.
            (3) Additional activities.--Additional research and 
        development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include 
        research and development related to--
                    (A) marine mammal predation on salmon;
                    (B) studies of juvenile salmon survival in spawning 
                and rearing areas;
                    (C) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and adult 
                salmon survival;
                    (D) impacts on salmon life cycles from sources 
                other than water resources projects; and
                    (E) other innovative technologies and actions 
                intended to improve fish survival, including the 
                survival of resident fish.
            (4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate any 
        activities carried out under this subsection with appropriate 
        Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, and 
        the Northwest Power Planning Council.
            (5) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress 
        a report on the research and development activities carried out 
        under this subsection, including any recommendations of the 
        Secretary concerning the research and development activities.
            (6) Authorization of appropriations.--There are authorized 
        to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out research and 
        development activities under subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 
        paragraph (3).
    (b) Advanced Turbine Development.--
            (1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of 
        Energy, the Secretary shall accelerate efforts toward 
        developing innovative, efficient, and environmentally safe 
        hydropower turbines, including design of ``fish-friendly'' 
        turbines, for use on the Columbia River hydro system.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There are authorized 
        to be appropriated $12,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
    (c) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the authority 
of the Secretary to implement the results of the research and 
development carried out under this section or any other law.

SEC. 332. RECREATIONAL USER FEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 210(b)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 1968 
(16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b)(4)) is amended by inserting before the period at 
the end the following: ``and, subject to the availability of 
appropriations, shall be used for the purposes specified in section 
4(i)(3) of the Act at the water resources development project at which 
the fees were collected''.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a 
report, with respect to fiscal year 1995, on--
            (1) the amount of day-use fees collected under section 
        210(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b)) 
at each water resources development project; and
            (2) the administrative costs associated with the collection 
        of the day-use fees at each water resources development 
        project.

SEC. 333. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION.

    (a) National Shoreline Erosion Control Development and 
Demonstration Program.--The Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1056, 
chapter 960; 33 U.S.C. 426e et seq.), is amended by adding at the end 
the following:

``SEC. 5. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    ``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
            ``(1) Erosion control program.--The term `erosion control 
        program' means the national shoreline erosion control 
        development and demonstration program established under this 
        section.
            ``(2) Secretary.--The term `Secretary' means the Secretary 
        of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers of the Army 
        Corps of Engineers.
    ``(b) Establishment of Erosion Control Program.--The Secretary 
shall establish and conduct a national shoreline erosion control 
development and demonstration program for a period of 8 years beginning 
on the date that funds are made available to carry out this section.
    ``(c) Requirements.--
            ``(1) In general.--The erosion control program shall 
        include provisions for--
                    ``(A) demonstration projects consisting of 
                planning, designing, and constructing prototype 
                engineered and vegetative shoreline erosion control 
                devices and methods during the first 5 years of the 
                erosion control program;
                    ``(B) adequate monitoring of the prototypes 
                throughout the duration of the erosion control program;
                    ``(C) detailed engineering and environmental 
                reports on the results of each demonstration project 
                carried out under the erosion control program; and
                    ``(D) technology transfers to private property 
                owners and State and local entities.
            ``(2) Emphasis.--The demonstration projects carried out 
        under the erosion control program shall emphasize, to the 
        extent practicable--
                    ``(A) the development and demonstration of 
                innovative technologies;
                    ``(B) efficient designs to prevent erosion at a 
                shoreline site, taking into account the life-cycle cost 
                of the design, including cleanup, maintenance, and 
                amortization;
                    ``(C) natural designs, including the use of 
                vegetation or temporary structures that minimize 
                permanent structural alterations;
                    ``(D) the avoidance of negative impacts to adjacent 
                shorefront communities;
                    ``(E) in areas with substantial residential or 
                commercial interests adjacent to the shoreline, designs 
                that do not impair the aesthetic appeal of the 
                interests;
                    ``(F) the potential for long-term protection 
                afforded by the technology; and
                    ``(G) recommendations developed from evaluations of 
                the original 1974 program established under the 
                Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974 
                (section 54 of Public Law 93-251; 42 U.S.C. 1962d-5 
                note), including--
                            ``(i) adequate consideration of the 
                        subgrade;
                            ``(ii) proper filtration;
                            ``(iii) durable components;
                            ``(iv) adequate connection between units; 
                        and
                            ``(v) consideration of additional relevant 
                        information.
            ``(3) Sites.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Each demonstration project under 
                the erosion control program shall be carried out at a 
                privately owned site with substantial public access, or 
                a publicly owned site, on open coast or on tidal 
                waters.
                    ``(B) Selection.--The Secretary shall develop 
                criteria for the selection of sites for the 
                demonstration projects, including--
                            ``(i) a variety of geographical and 
                        climatic conditions;
                            ``(ii) the size of the population that is 
                        dependent on the beaches for recreation, 
                        protection of homes, or commercial interests;
                            ``(iii) the rate of erosion;
                            ``(iv) significant natural resources or 
                        habitats and environmentally sensitive areas; 
                        and
                            ``(v) significant threatened historic 
                        structures or landmarks.
                    ``(C) Areas.--Demonstration projects under the 
                erosion control program shall be carried out at not 
                fewer than 2 sites on each of the shorelines of--
                            ``(i) the Atlantic, Gulf, and Pacific 
                        coasts;
                            ``(ii) the Great Lakes; and
                            ``(iii) the State of Alaska.
    ``(d) Cooperation.--
            ``(1) Parties.--The Secretary shall carry out the erosion 
        control program in cooperation with--
                    ``(A) the Secretary of Agriculture, particularly 
                with respect to vegetative means of preventing and 
                controlling shoreline erosion;
                    ``(B) Federal, State, and local agencies;
                    ``(C) private organizations;
                    ``(D) the Coastal Engineering Research Center 
                established under the first section of Public Law 88-
                172 (33 U.S.C. 426-1); and
                    ``(E) university research facilities.
            ``(2) Agreements.--The cooperation described in paragraph 
        (1) may include entering into agreements with other Federal, 
        State, or local agencies or private organizations to carry out 
        functions described in subsection (c)(1) when appropriate.
    ``(e) Report.--Not later than 60 days after the conclusion of the 
erosion control program, the Secretary shall prepare and submit an 
erosion control program final report to the Committee on Environment 
and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives. The report shall 
include a comprehensive evaluation of the erosion control program and 
recommendations regarding the continuation of the erosion control 
program.
    ``(f) Funding.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Federal 
        share of the cost of a demonstration project under the erosion 
        control program shall be determined in accordance with section 
        3.
            ``(2) Responsibility.--The cost of and responsibility for 
        operation and maintenance (excluding monitoring) of a 
        demonstration project under the erosion control program shall 
        be borne by non-Federal interests on completion of construction 
        of the demonstration project.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (e) of the first section of 
the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1056, chapter 960; 33 U.S.C. 
426e(e)), is amended by striking ``section 3'' and inserting ``section 
3 or 5''.

SEC. 334. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.

    (a) Contributions for Environmental and Recreation Projects.--
Section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2325(b)) is amended by striking ``(8662)'' and inserting 
``(8862)''.
    (b) Challenge Cost-Sharing Program.--The second sentence of section 
225(c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 2328(c)) is amended by striking ``(8662)'' 
and inserting ``(8862)''.
S 640 RS----2
S 640 RS----3
S 640 RS----4
S 640 RS----5
S 640 RS----6
S 640 RS----7
S 640 RS----8
S 640 RS----9
S 640 RS----10
S 640 RS----11
```