alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FORM 10Q FOR NINE MONTHS ENDED 12/31/96
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,597
<PP&E>                                         948,092
<DEPRECIATION>                                 442,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 701,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,475,872
<BONDS>                                            848
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,222
<OTHER-SE>                                   (780,363)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   701,579
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,803,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,670
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,832,028)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,832,028)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,832,028)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-2918

_____________________________

LILIA BELKOVA,

Petitioner,

v.

JAMES CIUFFETELLI,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

June 17, 2024

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Lilia Belkova, pro se, Petitioner.
2

James Ciuffetelli, pro se, Respondent.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 477 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 477

 To provide for the temporary suspension of the reformulated gasoline 
 requirements under the Clean Air Act in States where bona fide health 
   concerns have been raised until those concerns are appropriately 
                               addressed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 27 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

Mr. Kohl (for himself and Mr. Feingold) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the temporary suspension of the reformulated gasoline 
 requirements under the Clean Air Act in States where bona fide health 
   concerns have been raised until those concerns are appropriately 
                               addressed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSPENSION OF REFORMULATED GASOLINE RULES.

    Notwithstanding any other law, upon the certification by 
appropriate health officials of a State that bona fide health concerns 
have been raised with respect to the use of reformulated gasoline as 
required by rules issued by the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency to achieve the objectives of 211(k) of the Clean Air 
Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(k)), the Administrator shall suspend implementation 
of those rules in the State until the later of--
            (1) April 1, 1995; or
            (2) the date on which the Secretary of Health and Human 
        Services and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
        Agency, in conjunction with appropriate public health officials 
        of the State, certify that the reformulated gasoline used to 
        achieve the objectives of that section is not causing human 
        health problems.

SEC. 2. STUDY OF HEALTH EFFECTS OF REFORMULATED GASOLINE.

    The Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Administrator of 
the Environmental Protection Agency, in conjunction with appropriate 
public health officials of a State that has requested a suspension of 
rules under section 1, shall--
            (1) investigate health complaints associated with use of 
        reformulated gasoline in the State;
            (2) report to Congress by April 1, 1995, on the result of 
        the investigation; and
            (3) include in the report recommendations for alternative 
        formulations that will meet with requirements of section 211(k) 
        of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(k)) without causing the 
        health problems reported in the State.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
      32.1






CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE
      15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the quarterly report of Internal Hydro International, Inc.
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Craig
      A. Huffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date: May 22, 2005
              By: /s/
                  Craig A. Huffman
                Craig
                    A. Huffman
                  Chief
                    Executive Officer
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-10422

Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO MIRANDA,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:94-CR-437-P

_________________________________________________________________

March 13, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonio Miranda appeals his sentence in a conviction for

possession of heroin with intent to distribute. He argues that the

district court erred in declining to reduce his offense level by

three levels for acceptance of responsibility pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 3E1.1(b)(2). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. The finding of the district court that Miranda did not

timely notify the government of his intent to plead guilty is not

clearly erroneous. See United States v. Tello, 9 F.3d 1119, 1122

(5th Cir. 1993).

A F F I R M E D.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of ValCom, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Vellardita, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ValCom, Inc. and will be retained by ValCom, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




January
13, 2009


By:  /s/ Vince
      VellarditaVince
      VellarditaChief Executive
      Officer,Chief Financial
      Officer(Principal Executive
      Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 1, 2019

No. 04-19-00732-CR

Eric Nathaniel REEL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR11077

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDE R

On October 27, 2019, appellant’s appointed trial counsel, Lynette Boggs-Perez, filed a 

motion in this court requesting to withdraw as appellate counsel. After consideration, we

GRANT counsel’s motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. Because appellant is indigent, new 

appellate counsel must be appointed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal ABATED and REMANDED to the trial court for 

appointment of new appellate counsel by November 18, 2019. See Duncan v. State, 653 S.W.2d 

38, 40 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (holding that appellate courts may abate appeals so that trial court 

can assure appellant has effective assistance of counsel). We further ORDER the trial court 

clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order appointing new 

appellate counsel in this court by December 2, 2019.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 5, 2009



/s/ DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. PasseriPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
CHRISTOPHER
NELSON


1182
CANOE POINT


DELRAY
BEACH, FL 33444


 


July
17, 2014


 


Cyclone
Power Technologies Inc.


Attn:
Frankie Fruge / Board of Directors


601
NE 26th Ct.


Pompano
Beach, FL 33480


 


Dear
Ms. Fruge:


 


I
hereby tender my resignation as President of cyclone Power Technologies, Inc. effective as of 5.:00pm EDT on July 17, 2014. I
acknowledge that the last day for which I was on the cyclone payroll for receipt of salary was May 31, 2014. I am owed no salary
from June 1 through July 17, 2014.


 


Thank
you.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Christopher
    Nelson
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Robert L. Howard-AndersonName:

Robert L. Howard-AndersonTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer




I, Howard M.
Bailey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Occam Networks, Inc.



By:

/s/ Howard M. BaileyName:

Howard M. BaileyTitle:

Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will be retained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report of Whittier Energy Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, (the “Report”), I, Bryce W.Rhodes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to myknowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)); and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 14, 2006 | * * | */s/ Bryce W. Rhodes*   |
|-----------------------|----------|-------------------------|
|                  |     | Bryce W. Rhodes         |
|                  |     | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No OlNEIIOl107

THE REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA

BUREAU OF MARITIME AFFAIRS

TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF

BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

This is to certify that the Ballast Water Management System listed below has been

examined and tested in accordance with the requirements of the specifications contained

in the Guidelines contained in IMO resolution MEPC.125 (53). This certificate is valid

only for the Ballast Water Management System referred to below.

Ballast Water Management System supplied by or under license from NEI Treatment

Systems, LLC

Under type and model designation VOS-2500 and incorporating:

Ballast Water Management System manufactured by or under license from NEI Treatment

Systems, LLC

To equipment/assembly drawing No: 07-2500-101 date: 29 August 2007

Other equipment manufactured by: N/ A

To equipment/assembly drawing No.: N/A date: N/A

Treatment Rated Capacity: 2,500 m31h

A copy of this Type Approval Certificate should be carried on board a vessel fitted

with this Ballast Water Management System at all times. A reference to the test

protocol and a copy of the test results should be available for inspection on board the

vessel.

Signed 0!1:A~~~9. .

Deputy Commissioner of Maritime Affairs, Republic of Liberia

Dated this 11th. day ofOctober.2007 ..

Encl. Copy of the original test results.

03/07
#### NEWSOME TRUCK LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. BIRMINGHAM FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent.

No. A-10899.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 6, 1965.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 3, 1965.

Oldham & Lorance, Arthur Stamm, Jr., Houston, for petitioner.

Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates & Jaworski, Tom Connally, Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Civil Appeals at Houston in this case (390 S.W.2d 537) conflicts with the decision of the Eastland Court of Civil Appeals in the case of Continental Insurance Company v. Griffin, 218 S.W.2d 350 (1949).

We are in agreement with the decision of the Houston Court in the present case.

The application for writ of error herein is Refused, No Reversible Error. Rule 483 Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 13-3382

___________________________

Charles A. Winston

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Theaster Petty, Kitchen Supervisor, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Lahan

Ester, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; Greg

Harmon, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC; James Gibon, Disciplinary

Hearing Administrator, ADC; Larry D. May, Chief Deputy Director, ADC; Ray

Hobbs, Director, ADC

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________

 Submitted: June 20, 2014

Filed: June 23, 2014 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Charles Winston appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Theaster Petty, a kitchen supervisor with the Arkansas

Department of Correction (ADC), and various other ADC employees. After careful

review, we conclude that Winston’s retaliatory discipline claim failed as a matter of

law because Petty’s disciplinary report provides some evidence that Winston actually

violated prison rules. Cf. Hartsfield v. Nichols, 511 F.3d 826, 831 (8th Cir. 2008)

(report from correctional officer, even if disputed by inmate and supported by no other

evidence, legally suffices as some evidence upon which to base prison disciplinary

violation, if violation is found by impartial decisionmaker). We also conclude that

Winston cannot create a genuine issue of material fact as to his hearing officer’s

impartiality based only on the allegation that Winston had previously filed grievances

against the hearing officer. See Meuir v. Greene Cnty. Jail Emps., 487 F.3d 1115,

1119 (8th Cir. 2007) (in case of retaliatory discipline, merely alleging that act was

retaliatory is insufficient).

We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Winston’s pending motion

for appointment of counsel.

______________________________

1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth

Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 328 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 328

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for the 
 reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in ozone 
   nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 1 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Clean Air Act to provide for an optional provision for the 
 reduction of work-related vehicle trips and miles travelled in ozone 
   nonattainment areas designated as severe, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EMPLOYER MANDATED TRIP REDUCTION.

    Section 182(d)(1)(B) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 
7511a(d)(1)(B)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(B)(i) The State may submit a revision at any time 
        requiring employers in the area to implement programs to reduce 
        work-related vehicle trips and miles traveled by employees.
            ``(ii) A revision under clause (i) may require that 
        employers in the area increase average passenger occupancy per 
        vehicle in commuting trips between home and the workplace 
        during peak travel periods.
            ``(iii) A revision under clause (i) shall be developed in 
        accordance with guidance issued by the Administrator under 
        section 108(f). The guidance may specify average vehicle 
        occupancy rates that vary for locations within a nonattainment 
        area (suburban, center city, business district) or among 
        nonattainment areas reflecting occupancy rates and the 
        availability of high occupancy modes.
            ``(v) A revision under clause (i) may require employers 
        subject to a vehicle occupancy requirement to submit a 
        compliance plan to demonstrate compliance with any requirements 
        imposed under this subparagraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the nine months ended March 31, 2005 as
filed  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:


1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: June 9, 2005                          By:  /s/ Daniel R. Dwight
                                                     ---------------------------
                                          Name:      Daniel R. Dwight
                                         Title:      President and Chief
                                                     Executive Officer


                                            By:  /s/ Daniel R. Dwight
                                                     ---------------------------
                                          Name:      Daniel R. Dwight
                                         Title:      Acting Chief Financial
                                                     Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kronos Advanced
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.