alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Amendment No. 5 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sen Yu International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Tongyu Zhang, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.








Date: October 13 , 2011
 
 By:  /s/ Tongyu Zhang
 Name: Tongyu Zhang
 Title: Interim Chief Financial Officer








This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 I, Kathleen P. Bloch, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Langer, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, as hereby amended,fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K, as hereby amended,fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Langer,
Inc.
 
 A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
 
 Dated:April 30,
    2009
              /s/  Kathleen P.
      BlochKathleen P. Bloch, Vice President
      andChief Financial
      Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 654 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                 S. 654

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel SUNRISE.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with the 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel SUNRISE (United States official number 950381).

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 654

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
 documentation with the appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel SUNRISE.
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 622

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that a State containing an ozone

nonattainment area that does not significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment in its own area or any other area shall be treated as satisfying

certain requirements if the State makes certain submissions, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 24 (legislative day, MARCH 23), 1995

Mr. LEVIN (for himself and Mr. ABRAHAM) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to provide that a State containing an ozone nonattainment area that does not significantly contribute to ozone nonattainment in its own area

or any other area shall be treated as satisfying certain

requirements if the State makes certain submissions, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OZONE NONATTAINMENT.

4 Subsection (h) of section 182 of the Clean Air Act

5 (42 U.S.C. 7511a(h)) is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 622 IS

1 ‘‘(h) NONATTAINMENT TRANSPORT AREAS.—Not2 withstanding any other provision of this section or section

3 181, a State containing a rural or nonrural ozone non4 attainment area that does not significantly contribute to

5 ozone nonattainment in its own area or any other area

6 shall be treated as satisfying the requirements of this sec7 tion if the State makes the submissions required under

8 subsection (a).’’.

Æ
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. ADOLFO SANDOVAL-GALVEZ, Defendant - Appellant. No. 09-10523 D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00584-SRB-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 1, 2010 San Francisco, California Before: NOONAN, PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges. Adlofo Sandoval-Galvez (“Sandoval-Galv ez”) appeals his conviction for a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the district court abused its discretion when it admitted into evidence certified copies of immigration records documenting his eight prior illegal entrie s and related removals. We affirm. 

# FILED
NOV 16 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 The district court’s evidentiary rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion. United States v. Lynch , 367 F.3d 1148, 1159 (9th Cir. 2004). If evidence is improperly admitted, reversal is appropriate only if the error was not harmless. United States v. Derington , 229 F.3d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 2000). “If, on the record as a whole, consideration by the jury of the evidence for that purpose would not have likely changed its decision, then the error was harmless.” Id. Sandoval-Galvez contends that the distri ct court abused its discretion under Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403 when it allowed the government to introduce evidence of eight prior illegal entr ies and related removals to prove that Sandoval-Galvez knowingly and voluntarily en tered the United States on the date in question. We need not resolve this question, b ecause even assuming that the district court abused its discretion, the admission of evidence documenting his eight prior entries and removals was harmless error. United States v. Romero , 282 F.3d 683, 688 (9th Cir. 2002). The government provided a significant amount of other evidence to show that Sandoval-Galvez knowingly and voluntarily crossed into the United States. Sandoval-Galvez admitted to Border Patrol agents that he was headed to Los Angeles and he knew that it was unlawful to cross into the United States. Border Patrol agen ts tracked a single set of footprints from the Colorado3 River to Sandoval-Galvez’s location and c onfirmed that his shoes matched the tracks. Given this additional evidence, any error in admitting Sandoval-Galvez’s eight prior entries and removals was harmless. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    Date: August 14, 2008
    /s/ Gary L. DreherGary L. DreherPresident and Chief Executive Officer

AMDL, Inc.
•si

I-*

I

M

in

en

5

oi±)^

01

TO l_

2

IJ

SJ

> > v

C ;

3 >

8 r

0

13 wi

>:

H 2

•i;

r H

li \ \ \ \

«\W\
AAM

- 1 3

- 3 90

- E June 12, 2013

Exemption No. 1079 5

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 0 4 74

M r

. Michael Rhodes

Diamond Helicopters, LLC

11 Decatur Drive

Nashua, NH 03062

Dear M r

. Rhodes :

This le tter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated Ma y 24 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Diamond Helicopters

, LLC ( Diamond Helicopters) for an exemption from part 120

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Diamond

Helic opters to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing

program

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a p recedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Diamond Helicopters

.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing

programs into one would be in the public intere st and would maintain an equivalent level of2

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons fo r requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant

of Exemption No. 9703 ;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also

apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Diamond Helicopters , Inc

. an exemption from 14 CFR

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Diamond Helicopters to cover its safety

- sensitive

employees under one drug and alcohol testing program , subj ect to the conditions and

limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Diamond Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of

the Diamond Helicopters part 135 operat ion, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on June 30 , 201 5 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial
officer of FCB Financial Corp., certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, which accompanies this
certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of FCB Financial Corp. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350) and shall not be relied upon
for any other purpose.

         Dated this 13th day of November, 2002.



                                      /s/ Brian R. Foster
                                      ----------------------------------------
                                      Brian R. Foster
                                      Chief Executive and Financial Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 590

For the relief of Matt Clawson.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 22 (legislative day, MARCH 16), 1995

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

For the relief of Matt Clawson.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury

5 shall pay, out of funds in the Treasury not otherwise ap6 propriated, the sum of $87,674 to Mr. Clawson in full set7 tlement of a claim against the United States for losses

8 incurred as a result of his good faith reliance on the ap9 proval of the Forest Service of his claim for a placer mine

10 of approximately 20 acres outside the wilderness area and

11 above the ordinary high water mark of the Middle Fork

12 of the Salmon River in Idaho.
2

•S 590 IS

1 (b) LIMITATION.—Not more than 10 percent of the

2 amount made available under subsection (a) shall be paid

3 or delivered to or received by any agent or attorney on

4 account of service rendered in connection with the claim,

5 any contract to the contrary notwithstanding. Violation of

6 this subsection is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not

7 to exceed $10,000.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 4, 2010 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) theinformation contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 4, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 19, 2010 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Dear Mr. Bicer:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015

− 2869 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make (s)

, model (s) , and type(s) (i.e.

, fixed

- wing, rotorcraft, lighter

- than

- air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description (s) should include the maximum weight ( including payload)

. This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/11/15 . I f we do not receive the information

, we will close the dock et without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549.

Sincerely, /s/ Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst
NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 229

- CV


### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ARLYNE JOHNSON , A ppellant ,

v.
OC GOLF, LLC , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides , and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on September 24, 2014 . On
October 2, 2014 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely
filed and that the appeal was subje ct to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas
Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of
this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not2

significantly injured by the app ellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response
has been received from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain h er failure to file a brief, file a

motion for extension of time to file h er brief, or file h er brief. Acc ordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 30th day of October , 20 14

.
<Page>

32.1    Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
        of Apogee Robotics, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley
        Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Apogee Robotics, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
Michael Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Apogee
Robotics, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 28, 2007

                                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Michael Anthony
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


                                                    /s/ Michael Anthony
                                                    ----------------------
                                                    Michael Anthony
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6975

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STEVEN A. SILVERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior Judge, sitting

by designation. (CR-87-144-Y)

Submitted: January 2, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven A. Silvers, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew George Warrens Norman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court's order. See United States v. Ursery,

___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 4565, 4566, 4572 (U.S. June 24, 1996)

(Nos. 95-345; 95-346). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 8, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 181 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-178, CP2024-184.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-02531 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P