alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          97,359
<SECURITIES>                                     1,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,054
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,413
<PP&E>                                       3,943,835
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,436,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,643,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,864
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,633,606
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,643,470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,172
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,913
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,259
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,259
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,259
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, February 8, 2024, at 10:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th floor) and virtual.

# Note:

                         For those attending the meeting in person, current COVID-19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC COVID-19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the contact page at                         *https://www.fec.gov/​contact/​.*                         If you would like to virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS: 

                        This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting virtually, go to the Commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Draft Advisory Opinion 2024-02: Congresswoman Maxine Waters and Citizens for Waters

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on the Madison Project, Inc. (A21-11)

Draft Notice of Inquiry in REG 2014-10 and REG 2019-04 (Segregated Party Accounts)

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer

Telephone: (202) 694-1220

                    Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040 or                     *secretary@fec.gov,*                     at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.                

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-02393 Filed 2-1-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-51146

Summary Calendar

 

JERRY HOMANN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-97-CV-717-JN

--------------------

November 9, 1999

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jerry Homann has appealed the district court’s order

affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security

denying his claim for disability benefits. Homann contends: that

the Commissioner erred in failing to credit his treating

physician’s opinion that Homann’s condition met or was equal to 

listing 1.05C of the Listing of Impairments; that the

Commissioner erred by disregarding Homann’s limitation in the use

of his hands; that the Commissioner failed to prove that there

are a substantial number of jobs in the economy that he can

perform; and that the Commissioner did not apply the proper 
No. 98-51146 

-2-

standard in reviewing his subjective complaints of pain. Based

upon a careful review of the record, the briefs, and applicable

law, we conclude that there was substantial evidence in the

record to support the Commissioner’s decision to deny disability

benefits and that the Commissioner used proper legal standards in

evaluating the evidence. See Villa v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1019,

1021 (5th Cir. 1990) (standard of review). The district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40513 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus WALTER ANTONIO CASTRILLO-ARAUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-320-1

- - - - - - - - - - October 22, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *The court-appointed attorneys for Walter Antonio CastrilloArauz have filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, Castrillo’s court-appointed attorneys are excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ERIC RAMBERT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 503 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference into the following Registration
Statements, including amendments, pertaining to the Stock Option Plan(s) of
Film Roman, Inc.: Form S-8 (No. 333-19387), Form S-8 (No. 333-80779), Form S-8
(No. 333-90003), and Form S-8 (No. 333-90009), of our report dated March 14,
2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Film Roman, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001.

                                                          /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                          ----------------------
                                                            Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
March 27, 2002
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1064

MARY W. MCMILLAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-99-2-3) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary W. McMillan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on December 18, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on January 6, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Mary W. McMillan appeals the district court’s order denying her leave to proceed in forma pauperis in her civil action. The denial of in forma pauperis status is an immediately appealable order. See Roberts v. United States District Court , 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no abuse of discretion. We therefore deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal of the district court’s order. See McMillan v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs , No. CA-99-2-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nolan K. Bushnell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


August 1, 2006                                         By: /s/ NOLAN K. BUSHNELL
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Nolan K. Bushnell
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 

Independent non-employee directors of Mastech Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive an
annual retainer fee of $27,500 in 2017, other than the Chair of the Audit Committee who will receive an annual retainer fee of $35,000 in 2017. In addition, independent non-employee directors of the Company
are eligible to participate in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, as amended. Non-independent directors of the Company will not receive any compensation for their service as directors of the Company.

 All of the Company’s directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attending Board of Directors and committee
meetings.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gulf Coast Oil & Gas, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Rahim
Rayani, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: June 5, 2006
                                           /s/ RAHIM RAYANI
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Rahim Rayani
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President
                                           Chief Financial Officer
The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern 1 District of Iowa. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1387

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Miguel Angel Cervantes, also known * as Rocky Cervantes, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 18, 1998 Filed: March 26, 1998

___________ Before LOKEN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Migue l Angel Cervantes challenges his convictions for conspiring to distribute marijuana and using a communication fa cility to distribute marijuana, and the resulting 60-month sentence imposed by the district court. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant 1 to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and has moved to withdraw. Afte r carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that Cervantes & s Speedy Trial Act and-2-

double jeopardy claims, to the extent they may be raised, are without mer it. See United States v. McFarland , 116 F.3d 316, 318 (8th Cir .) (defendant waived Speedy Trial Act violation by failin g to move for dismissal; seven-month delay between indictment and trial did not violate Sixth Amendment right to speedy trial), ce rt. denied , 118 S. Ct. 394 (1997); United States v. Bentley , 82 F.3d 222, 223 (8th Cir. 1996) (defendant & s failure to raise double jeopardy argument in district court constitutes waiver); United States v. Basile , 109 F.3d 1304, 1306-07 (8th Cir.) (dual sovereignty doctrine permits both state and federal governments to punish same individual for same act), ce rt. denied , 118 S. Ct. 173, and cert. denied , 118 S. Ct. 189 (1997).
We h ave reviewed the record for any nonfrivolous issues in accordance wit h Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and find none. Accordingly, the judgment of th e district court is affirmed and counsel & s motion to withdraw is granted. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 23.1**





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





Langer, Inc.
      and Subsidiaries


Deer
      Park, New York




We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-139882,
        333-130765 and 333-92014 on Form S-3, Registration Statement Nos. 333-130764,
        333-94769 and 333-110962 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-94769
        on
        Form S-8A of our report dated March 28, 2007, relating to the consolidated
        financial statements and schedules of Langer, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the
        years ended December 31, 2005 and 2006 appearing in this Annual Report on
        Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.





/s/
      BDO
      Seidman, LLP


Melville,
      New York


April
      2,
      2007
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 616 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 616

 To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to provide parity between the United 
 States and certain free trade agreement countries with respect to the 
   exemption for personal and household effects purchased abroad by 
              returning residents, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 24 (legislative day, March 23), 1995

 Mr. Bingaman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to provide parity between the United 
 States and certain free trade agreement countries with respect to the 
   exemption for personal and household effects purchased abroad by 
              returning residents, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DUTY-FREE TREATMENT FOR PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD GOODS.

    (a) In General.--Section 321(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1321(b)) is amended by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting 
``(1) The Secretary'', and by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, in the 
        case of returning residents and nonresidents arriving in the 
        United States from a country--
                    ``(A) that is contiguous to the United States, and
                    ``(B) with respect to which the United States has a 
                free trade agreement,
        the amount of the exemption provided pursuant to this section 
        shall not exceed an amount equal to the exemption for personal 
        and household effects acquired in the United States provided by 
        such country to residents returning to (or nonresidents 
        arriving in) such country.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to goods described in section 321(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, that 
are entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after the 
date that is 15 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Joseph P. Ciavarella, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Langer, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present, in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of and for the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

      Date:  March 29, 2004             By:    /s/ Joseph P. Ciavarella
                                               ------------------------
                                        Name:  Joseph P. Ciavarella
                                        Title: Vice President and
                                               Chief Financial Officer