alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12318]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with their foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Kingdom of David and Solomon Discovered” by the Armstrong International Cultural Foundation, Edmond, Oklahoma, at the Armstrong Auditorium, Edmond, Oklahoma, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-02237 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 358 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 358

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an excise tax 
     exemption for certain emergency medical transportation by air 
                               ambulance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 6 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

 Mr. Heflin (for himself and Mr. Lott) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an excise tax 
     exemption for certain emergency medical transportation by air 
                               ambulance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCISE TAX EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN EMERGENCY MEDICAL 
              TRANSPORTATION BY AIR AMBULANCE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (f) of section 4261 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to imposition of tax on transportation 
by air) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(f) Exemption for Air Ambulances Providing Emergency Medical 
Transportation to Tertiary Care Facilities.--No tax shall be imposed 
under this section or section 4271 on transportation by an aircraft--
            ``(1) for an emergency medical condition (as defined in 
        section 1867(e)(1) of the Social Security Act), or
            ``(2) which satisfies the requirements of an appropriate 
        transfer (as defined in section 1867(c)(2) of such Act).''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to transportation beginning on or after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information
contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John CaldwellJohn CaldwellPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: August 17, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF**

**THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date:  November 10,  2008 | By:    | /s/ ROBERT L. HOWARD-ANDERSON         |
|-------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                                | Name:  | Robert L. Howard-Anderson             |
|                                | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

I, Jeanne Seeley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thefiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

 
| Date:  November 10,  2008 | By:    | /s/ JEANNE SEELEY       |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                                | Name:  | Jeanne Seeley           |
|                                | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Occam Networks, Inc. and will beretained by Occam Networks, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Caldera Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James W. Scott, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ James W. Scott

James W. Scott

Chief Financial Officer

January 23, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.4



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 11, 2003 |  |  |  |                              
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  |                              
|                       |  |  |  |                              
|                       |  |  |  |                              



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### Paul SWAN and Frances Swan, Respondents, v. Jerrold STUART, Doing Business As McVay Motor Company, Appellant.

No. 23385.

Kansas City Court of Appeals. Missouri.

Nov. 6, 1961.

Russell N. Pickett, Eugene E. Andereck, Phil Hauck, Thomas O. Pickett, Pickett, Andereck & Hauck, Trenton, for appellant.

R. Leroy Miller, Trenton, for respondent.

BROADDUS, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Paul Swan and Frances Mae Swan, are husband and wife. They instituted this action against defendant seeking to recover damages growing out of an automobile collision. Plaintiffs’ petition was in three counts. In Count I plaintiff, Frances Mae Swan, sought damages for personal injuries. In Count II both plaintiffs prayed for damages to their automobile, and in Count III, plaintiff, Paul Swan, asked damages for loss of his wife’s services.

The jury returned a verdict awarding plaintiff, Frances Mae Swan, $1,000 for personal injuries (Count I of plaintiffs’ petition), and gave plaintiffs nothing for damages to their automobile (Count II) and *833awarded plaintiff, Paul Swan, $380 for loss of his wife’s services (Count III).

Judgment was entered upon the verdict, and in due time defendant filed his motion for new trial. That motion was taken up by the trial court on November 28, 1960, and “sustained as to Count II and Count III of plaintiffs’ petition, and overruled as to Count I of plaintiffs’ petition.” Thereafter, defendant took this appeal.

 While the issue has not been raised by the parties, it becomes our duty to determine whether a final appealable judgment has been entered in the cause. Young v. Raupp, 301 S.W.2d 873, 874 (Mo.App.) The right of appeal is purely statutory. Section 512.020, V.A.M.S. provides that an appeal may be taken “from any final judgment in the case.” A judgment is defined by Section 511.020 as “the final determination of the right of the parties in the action.” A judgment to be final must dispose of all parties and all issues in the cause. Our statute does not allow parties to appeal piecemeal or permit them to bring one issue in a case to an appellate court while other issues therein remain undecided in the trial court. Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co., 339 Mo. 559, 98 S.W.2d 614. The only exception to this rule is where the trial court orders a separate trial of a claim or issue (which is not the situation here) as contemplated by the provisions of Section 510.180(2) and Civil Rule 82.06, V.A.M.R.

According to the record before us the issues raised in Counts II and III of the petition remain undetermined in the trial court. A judgment on one count is not final where there has been no disposition of the remaining counts of the petition. Anderson v. Metcalf, 300 S.W.2d 377, 378, (Mo.Sup.) The trial court should set aside the judgment entered on the first count and hold the verdict thereon in abeyance until a final judgment can be entered disposing of the whole case.

The appeal is premature and must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

All concur.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE JOSEPH SPOTTSWOOD CROWELL v . MAYME MODENA RO BERSON CROWELL Direct Appeal f

rom the Chancery

Court for Roane Cou

nty No. 13,202 Frank V. Williams, III, Chancellor

No. E1999-00348-COA-R3-CV - Decided July 13, 2000

OPINION DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

S USANO , J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which G ODDARD , P.J., and S WINEY , J., joined

The appellee has filed a petition for rehearing p

ursuant to Tenn. R.

App. P. 39. In the first ground of his petition , he asser ts that we made a mistake in computing the “[a]djustment re: North Carolina property” reflected on page 8 of our opinion. The appellee is in error in this assertion. We purposely utilized an adjusting figure of $141,9 15 rather than $1 40,447.50 -- the la tter figure being

fifty percent of

the value of the ma

rita l property share of the North Carolina property. The larger figure was a “plug” figure used to achieve equa

lity in the overall division of the parties’ marital property. Since it will be necessary to t ransfer f unds to consummate

this division, we dee

med it equitable in this

case to equally divide the parties’ marital estate. The trial court found that equality was equitable and the evidence does not preponderate against this finding.
As a second basis for his petition, the appellee contends that we did not award

him an offsetting c

redit for his share of the $10,000 in marital funds that the appellant usedin the creation of her family’s partnership. He is also wrong in this assertion. We ignored the appellant’s use of the $10,000 i n marital funds just

as we ignored the mar ital funds used by the appellee in connection with the North Carolina property. This latter amount, i.e. , $10,400, was a part of the $55,800 that was awarded to the appellee as his separate p roperty interest in the North

Carolina property. Since these two payments essentially offset one another, we chose to ignore them. The appellee’s motion for an exte nsion of time to file

his petition for re

hearing is granted. The petition for rehearing i

s denied at the cos

ts of Joseph Spottswo

od Crowell.
QCOM 12.25.11 EX32.2






EXHIBIT 32.2 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 
     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of QUALCOMM Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 25, 2011 (the Report), I, William E. Keitel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
		
	(1)
	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 


		
	(2)
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 




Dated: February 1, 2012 


	
		
	/s/ William E. Keitel  
	 

	William E. Keitel, 
	 

	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Donald D. Olinger, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Form 10-K for the annual period ended December31, 2003 of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–15(e) and 15d–15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 15, 2004 /s/ Donald D. Olinger   Donald D. Olinger   Chief Financial OfficerMeriStar Hospitality Corporation
1	 



     


    

 


The following abbreviations, when used in the
inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be constructed as though they were written out in full according to
applicable laws or regulations.





	TEN COM	- as tenants in common	UNF GIFT MIN ACT	Custodian
	TEN ENT	- as tenants by entireties	 	 
	JT TEN	as joint tenants with the right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 	 
	 	 	 	Act	 
	 	 	 	(State)
	 	 	 	 
	 	Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.



 


For value received,
________________________________________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto





	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER INDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	 	 	 
	 
	(please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code, of assignee)
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 	 	 	shares
	 
	of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
    appoint
	 
	 	 	 	, Attorney
	to transfer the said stock on the books of the within name Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.
	 	 	 



 





	Dated:	 	 
	X	 	 	 



 


THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE, THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN
ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Association and Credit unions).


 


 


 


 


SIGNATURE GUARANTEED:


 


 


 


TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY