Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / Notices 9187 

1See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting 

Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information, 

June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No. 

4679). 

ATTACHMENT 1—GENERAL TARGET SCHEDULE FOR PROCESSING AND RESOLVING REQUESTS FOR ACCESS TO SENSITIVE

UNCLASSIFIED NON-SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION AND SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION IN THIS PROCEEDING—Continued 

Day Event/activity 

20 ............. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff informs the requestor of the staff’s determination whether the request for access 

provides a reasonable basis to believe standing can be established and shows (1) need for SUNSI or (2) need to know for SGI. 

(For SUNSI, NRC staff also informs any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed 

by the release of the information.) If NRC staff makes the finding of need for SUNSI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins 

document processing (preparation of redactions or review of redacted documents). If NRC staff makes the finding of need to 

know for SGI and likelihood of standing, NRC staff begins background check (including fingerprinting for a criminal history 

records check), information processing (preparation of redactions or review of redacted documents), and readiness inspections. 

25 ............. If NRC staff finds no ‘‘need,’’ no ‘‘need to know,’’ or no likelihood of standing, the deadline for requestor/petitioner to file a motion 

seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff’s denial of access; NRC staff files copy of access determination with the presiding officer (or Chief Administrative Judge or other designated officer, as appropriate). If NRC staff finds ‘‘need’’ for SUNSI, the deadline 

for any party to the proceeding whose interest independent of the proceeding would be harmed by the release of the information 

to file a motion seeking a ruling to reverse the NRC staff’s grant of access. 

30 ............. Deadline for NRC staff reply to motions to reverse NRC staff determination(s). 

40 ............. (Receipt +30) If NRC staff finds standing and need for SUNSI, deadline for NRC staff to complete information processing and file 

motion for Protective Order and draft Non-Disclosure Agreement or Affidavit. Deadline for applicant/licensee to file Non-Disclosure Agreement or Affidavit for SUNSI. 

190 ........... (Receipt +180) If NRC staff finds standing, need to know for SGI, and trustworthiness and reliability, deadline for NRC staff to file 

motion for Protective Order and draft Non-Disclosure Agreement or Affidavit (or to make a determination that the proposed recipient of SGI is not trustworthy or reliable). Note: Before the Office of Administration makes a final adverse determination regarding 

access to SGI, the proposed recipient must be provided an opportunity to correct or explain information. 

205 ........... Deadline for petitioner to seek reversal of a final adverse NRC staff trustworthiness or reliability determination under 10 CFR 

2.336(f)(1)(iv). 

A .............. If access granted: Issuance of a decision by a presiding officer or other designated officer on motion for protective order for access 

to sensitive information (including schedule for providing access and submission of contentions) or decision reversing a final adverse determination by the NRC staff. 

A + 3 ........ Deadline for filing executed Non-Disclosure Agreements or Affidavits. Access provided to SUNSI and/or SGI consistent with decision issuing the protective order. 

A + 28 ...... Deadline for submission of contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI and/or SGI. However, if more than 25 

days remain between the petitioner’s receipt of (or access to) the information and the deadline for filing all other contentions (as 

established in the notice of opportunity to request a hearing and petition for leave to intervene), the petitioner may file its SUNSI 

or SGI contentions by that later deadline. 

A + 53 ...... (Contention receipt +25) Answers to contentions whose development depends upon access to SUNSI and/or SGI. 

A + 60 ...... (Answer receipt +7) Petitioner/Intervenor reply to answers. 

>A + 60 .... Decision on contention admission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02633 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. CP2023–181; MC2024–182 and 

CP2024–188; MC2024–183 and CP2024–189] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

a negotiated service agreement. This 

notice informs the public of the filing, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: February 13, 

2024. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at https://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

I. Introduction 

The Commission gives notice that the 

Postal Service filed request(s) for the 

Commission to consider matters related 

to negotiated service agreement(s). The 

request(s) may propose the addition or 

removal of a negotiated service 

agreement from the Market Dominant or 

the Competitive product list, or the 

modification of an existing product 

currently appearing on the Market 

Dominant or the Competitive product 

list. 

Section II identifies the docket 

number(s) associated with each Postal 

Service request, the title of each Postal 

Service request, the request’s acceptance 

date, and the authority cited by the 

Postal Service for each request. For each 

request, the Commission appoints an 

officer of the Commission to represent 

the interests of the general public in the 

proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 

(Public Representative). Section II also 

establishes comment deadline(s) 

pertaining to each request. 

The public portions of the Postal 

Service’s request(s) can be accessed via 

the Commission’s website (http://

www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of 

the Postal Service’s request(s), if any, 

can be accessed through compliance 

with the requirements of 39 CFR 

3011.301.1

The Commission invites comments on 

whether the Postal Service’s request(s) 

in the captioned docket(s) are consistent 

with the policies of title 39. For 

request(s) that the Postal Service states 

concern Market Dominant product(s), 

applicable statutory and regulatory 

requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39 

CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s) 

that the Postal Service states concern 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
9188 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 28 / Friday, February 9, 2024 / Notices 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 

3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

4To reflect the addition of Customer Cross 

Orders, the Exchange proposes to amend current 

Rule 6.62P–O(g) by removing the statement that ‘‘[a] 

Cross Order is a Qualified Contingent Cross 

(‘‘QCC’’) Order’’ and retaining the title of ‘‘Cross 

Orders’’. In addition, the Exchange proposes to 

update the title of paragraph Rule 6.62P–O (g)(1) to 

‘‘Qualified Contingent Cross (‘‘QCC’’) Orders.’’ The 

Exchange believes that these proposed changes 

would add clarity and transparency to, and improve 

the accuracy of, the Exchange’s rules. See proposed 

Rule 6.62P–O(g) and (g)(1). 

5See NYSE American Rule 900.3NYP(g)(2) 

(describing single-leg and complex Customer Cross 

Orders). See also Securities Exchange Act Release 

No. 99231 (December 22, 2023), 88 FR 89783 

(December 28, 2023) (SR–NYSEAMER–2023–66) 

(immediately effective rule change to adopt 

electronically-entered Customer Cross Orders). 

6See NYSE American Rule 900.3NYP(g)(2)(A). 

7See proposed Rule 6.62P–O(g)(2)(A) (providing, 

in relevant part, that ‘‘[a] C2C Order or Complex 

C2C Order that is not rejected per Rule 6.62P– 

O(g)(2)(B) [Execution of C2C Orders] or (C) 

[Execution of Complex C2C Orders], respectively, 

will immediately trade in full at its limit price’’). 

8Rule 1.1 defines ‘‘Minimum Price Variation’’ or 

‘‘MPV’’ as the price variations established by the 

Exchange, which for quoting and trading options 

traded on the Exchange are set forth in 6.72–O(a). 

9See proposed Rule 6.62P–O(g)(2)(A). See also 

Rule 6.47A–O, Commentary .01. 

Competitive product(s), applicable 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3035, and 

39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. Comment 

deadline(s) for each request appear in 

section II. 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

1. Docket No(s).: CP2023–181; Filing 

Title: USPS Notice of Amendment to 

Priority Mail, First-Class Package 

Service, Parcel Select & Parcel Return 

Service Contract 1, Filed Under Seal; 

Filing Acceptance Date: February 5, 

2024; Filing Authority: 39 CFR 

3035.105; Public Representative: Cherry 

Yao; Comments Due: February 13, 2024. 

2. Docket No(s).: MC2024–182 and 

CP2024–188; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority 

Mail & USPS Ground Advantage 

Contract 46 to Competitive Product List 

and Notice of Filing Materials Under 

Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: February 

5, 2024; Filing Authority: 39 U.S.C. 

3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through 

3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public 

Representative: Alain Brou; Comments 

Due: February 13, 2024. 

3. Docket No(s).: MC2024–183 and 

CP2024–189; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 

Advantage Contract 184 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing 

Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance 

Date: February 5, 2024; Filing Authority: 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 

through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; 

Public Representative: Samuel 

Robinson; Comments Due: February 13, 

2024. 

This Notice will be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Jennie L. Jbara, 

Alternate Certifying Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02731 Filed 2–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–99470; File No. SR– 

NYSEARCA–2024–09] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE 

Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and 

Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 

Rule Change To Modify Rule 6.62P–O 

February 5, 2024. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3

notice is hereby given that on January 

23, 2024, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE 

Arca’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I and II 

below, which Items have been prepared 

by the self-regulatory organization. The 

Commission is publishing this notice to 

solicit comments on the proposed rule 

change from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to modify 

Rule 6.62P–O (Orders and Modifiers) to 

adopt electronic Customer Cross Order 

and Complex Customer Cross Order 

functionality and to amend Rule 1.1 

(Definitions) to clarify the treatment of 

Professional Customer interest. The 

proposed rule change is available on the 

Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at 

the principal office of the Exchange, and 

at the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of, 

and basis for, the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to modify 

Rule 6.62P–O (Orders and Modifiers) to 

adopt electronically-entered Customer 

Cross (‘‘C2C’’) Orders and Complex 

Customer Cross (‘‘Complex C2C’’) 

Orders (collectively, ‘‘Customer Cross 

Orders’’). The Exchange also proposes to 

amend the definition of ‘‘Customer and 

Professional Customer’’ (Rule 1.1.) to 

clarify the treatment of Professional 

Customer interest. 

Proposed Rule 6.62P–O(g)(2): Customer 

Cross Orders 4

The Exchange proposes to adopt rules 

governing electronically-entered 

Customer Cross Orders, which rules are 

substantively identical to the recentlyadopted Customer Cross Orders on the 

Exchange’s affiliate, NYSE American 

LLC (‘‘NYSE American’’).5

Proposed Rule 6.62P–O(g)(2) would 

describe Customer Cross Orders. 

Proposed Rule 6.62P–O(g)(2)(A) would 

provide that a C2C Order and a Complex 

C2C Order must be comprised of a 

Customer (but not a Professional 

Customer) order to buy and a Customer 

(but not a Professional Customer) order 

to sell at the same price and for the same 

quantity. The proposal to limit eligible 

interest to Customer but not 

Professional Customer interest is 

substantively identical to the rules of 

NYSE American.6 In addition, as 

proposed, a C2C Order or Complex C2C 

Order that is not rejected on arrival 

would immediately trade in full at its 

limit price.7 Further, proposed Rule 

6.62P–O(g)(2)(A) would provide that 

C2C Orders and Complex C2C Orders 

would not route and may be entered 

with a Minimum Price Variation 

(‘‘MPV’’) of $0.01 regardless of the MPV 

of the options series.8 Finally, the 

proposed Rule would specify that 

Commentary .01 to Rule 6.47A–O would 

apply to Customer Cross Orders, which 

means that OTP Holders and OTP Firms 

may not utilize Customer Cross Orders 

to increase their economic gain without 

first giving other trading interest on the 

Exchange an opportunity to participate 

in the trade or to trade at the transaction 

price when the OTP Holder or OTP 

Firm was already bidding or offering at 

that price.9 This proposed handling of 

Customer Cross Orders is substantively 

identical to the rules on NYSE 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1