alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          41,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,121,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,310,523
<PP&E>                                         263,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                (56,910)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,958,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,184,942
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,717
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,610,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,958,675
<SALES>                                        102,349
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,349
<CGS>                                           91,455
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,809,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             241,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,040,145)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,040,145)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,040,145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    March 24, 2009
    
    By /s/ Shannon K S Johnson
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate
    
    Shannon K S Johnson
    
(principal
financial officer and  principal accounting officer)
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SBI COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
           (In thousands, except per share amounts)
</LEGEND>

<S>  <C>                                         <C>
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
     <PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
     <PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1999
     <CASH>                                                 0
     <SECURITIES>                                           0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                          0
     <ALLOWANCES>                                           0
     <INVENTORY>                                            0
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,940,000
     <DEPRECIATION>                                         0
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,940,000
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,142,000
     <PP&E>                                                10
     <BONDS>                                                0
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
     <PREFERRED>                                      765,000
     <COMMON>                                           5,570
     <OTHER-SE>                                     3,567,343
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,940,000
     <SALES>                                                0
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       0
     <CGS>                                                  0
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               199,000
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                        0
     <INCOME-TAX>                                           0
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
     <DISCONTINUED>                                         0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
     <CHANGES>                                              0
     <NET-INCOME>                                    (259,000)
     <EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.05)
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0)



</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D. Gary Fife, President of Big Bear Gold Corporation, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Big Bear Gold Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 9, 2004

/s/ D. Gary Fife				D. Gary Fife
President (Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report onForm 10-K of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the “Company”) for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as amended by this AmendmentNo. 1 on Form 10-K/A as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David C. Colby, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ DAVID C. COLBY        |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| David C. Colby            |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |   |
| Date: April 29, 2004      |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating,acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required bySection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 20, 2007 |  | /s/ Donald J. Zuk      
|                      |  | Donald J. Zuk          
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 385 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 385

   To amend title 23, United States Code, to eliminate the penalties 
  imposed on States for failure to require the use of safety belts in 
              passenger vehicles, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Gregg introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 23, United States Code, to eliminate the penalties 
  imposed on States for failure to require the use of safety belts in 
              passenger vehicles, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO REQUIRE USE OF 
              SAFETY BELTS.

    Section 153(h) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``and a law described in subsection (a)(2)'' each place it 
appears.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK KESSLER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 643 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EX-10.16



 Exhibit 10.16 

First Amendment to Letter Agreement 

First Amendment (“Amendment”) made as of October 4, 2016, to that certain letter agreement (the “Employment
Agreement”) dated June 7, 2015, by and between Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc., a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”), and Ran Frenkel setting forth the terms of Mr. Frenkel’s employment with the Company as Chief
Development Operations Officer. 
 WHEREAS, on August 29, 2014, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the
“Compensation Committee”) of the Company approved the terms of the employment arrangement with Mr. Ran Frenkel, which included a relocation allowance payable to Mr. Frenkel of up to $70,000 (the “Relocation Allowance”) for
expenses incurred by him in connection with the relocation of his and his family to a primary residence within a reasonable daily commute of the Company’s corporate headquarters located in Newton, Massachusetts; 

WHEREAS, on October 15, 2014, the Company and Mr. Frenkel entered into a letter agreement setting forth the terms of
Mr. Frenkel’s employment with the Company (the “Prior Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Prior Agreement provided for the
payment of the Relocation Allowance to Mr. Frenkel; 
 WHEREAS, On June 7, 2015, the Company and Mr. Frenkel entered into the
Employment Agreement, which, due to an oversight, did not provide for the payment of the Reallocation Allowance to Mr. Frenkel; 

WHEREAS, on June 16, 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the increase of the Relocation Allowance to $100,000; and 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Employment Agreement to provide for the payment to Mr. Frenkel of the Relocation
Allowance and desire that this Amendment be deemed a modification and an amendment to the Employment Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Company and Employee agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The Employment Agreement is amended to include the following language: 

  

	 	    	“In order to assist you in your relocation to a primary residence within a reasonable daily commute of the Company’s corporate headquarters located in Newton, Massachusetts, you will receive $100,000, subject
to applicable taxes, in the form of one or more payments to you; provided, however, that the $100,000 shall be reduced by the amount of any prior payments to you and expenses paid by the Company on your behalf in connection with your
relocation.” 

  

	 	2.	All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect according to their respective terms, and nothing contained herein shall be deemed a waiver of any right or abrogation of any
obligation otherwise existing under the Employment Agreement except to the extent specifically provided for herein. 


[Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the parties as of the date first above written. 

 

			
	Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher B. Primiano

	Christopher B. Primiano
	 SVP, Corporate Development,
 General
Counsel & Secretary

	
	 /s/ Ran Frenkel

	Ran Frenkel
Exhibit
4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 22, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 302


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on March 21, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the
evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-215492) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                        


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David C. Colby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/DAVID C. COLBY

---

David C. Colby Chief Financial OfficerDate:  March 15, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 264 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 264

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust for inflation the 
            dollar limitations on the dependent care credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 24 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

   Mr. Akaka introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to adjust for inflation the 
            dollar limitations on the dependent care credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Working Families Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT OF DEPENDENT CARE CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (e) of section 21 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to expenses for household and dependent 
care services necessary for gainful employment) is amended by adding at 
the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(10) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any taxable 
        year beginning in a calendar year after 1995, each dollar 
        amount contained in subsections (c) and (d)(2) shall be 
        increased by an amount equal to--
                    ``(A) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                    ``(B) the cost-of-living adjustment determined 
                under section 1(f)(3) for the calendar year in which 
                the taxable year begins, by substituting `calendar year 
                1994' for `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                thereof.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2448

JAMES M. GIBBS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MORGANITE, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

WIN STEPHENS, individually and in his official

capacity; MON VONKCHALEE, individually and in

his official capacity; DAVID COOPER, individually and in his official capacity; BRUCE

MILLER, individually and in his official

capacity; ROGER BONE, individually and in his

official capacity; EDWIN ENNIS, individually

and in his official capacity; DOUG BLIZZARD,

individually and in his official capacity;

LARRY WEST; RUSSELL LEE, individually and in

his official capacity; BERT JENKINS, individually and in his official capacity; PHILLIP

BOWDEN, individually and in his official

capacity,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CA-99-309-5-BR2)
2

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: July 30, 2001

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James H. Locus, Jr., LOCUS LAW FIRM, Fayetteville, North Carolina,

for Appellant. Gregory P. McGuire, Sarah H. Roane, HAYNSWORTH,

BALDWIN, JOHNSON & GREAVES, L.L.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

James Morgan Gibbs, Jr., filed suit against his Employer,

Morganite, Inc. (“Morganite”), alleging discrimination on the basis

of race and/or national origin and disability, in violation of

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Act of

1866, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981 (West Supp. 2000), and the American with

Disabilities Act (“ADA”). He now appeals the district court’s

order granting summary judgment to Morganite, granting Morganite’s

motion to strike, denying Gibbs’ motion to amend, and dismissing

the action.

This Court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo.

Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th

Cir. 1988). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no

material facts in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v.

Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). This Court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986).

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the materials submitted in the joint appendices, and fully considered the arguments

raised on appeal. We find that the district court’s opinion is

thorough and well-reasoned. We therefore affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Gibbs v. Morganite, Inc., No. CA-99-

309-5-BR2 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 2000) (J.A. at 68-103). We dispense
4

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED