alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 531 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 531

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 1995

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in an in banc hearing 
 of a case to continue to participate in that case after taking senior 
                    status, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    The last sentence of section 46(c) of title 28, United States Code, 
is amended by inserting ``(1)'' after ``eligible'' and by inserting 
before the period at the end of the sentence ``, or (2) to continue to 
participate in the decision of a case or controversy that was heard or 
reheard by the court in banc at a time when such judge was in regular 
active service''.

            Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day, September 
      25), 1995.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,013
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,678
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,114
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,192
<PP&E>                                          76,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,685
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,486
<SALES>                                        102,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               102,175
<CGS>                                           56,906
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  110,957
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,191)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,278)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,913)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.46)


</TABLE>
Order - Page **1** of **1**

**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No.**  **DA 23 -**  **0633** STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DAVID RAY SCHULTZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 1 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Dated this ____ day of February , 2024. Supreme Court Justice

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 26 2024

02/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0633
CDATESOFiNSERTION12August),2009,reYou,asvendor,areauthfollows:Advertisement.tobepultobeincapitalsandsubjectmattlnoticeadveing;chargetobeoccupyingsimilarspace;advertisecontractawardedtoithereunder,sex,religiouscreed,ancestry,agediscrimination,shallhavetherighttosetforth.Proofofadvertisinginthebytheeditororpublisher)toAge.CommonwealthtobebilledACCOUNTFUNDDEPTCODEfrCQ‘iINVOICE(Tobecompleted‘bypur5.1DATEOFIRIstAd2ndAd‘3rdAdComjponwaithofPenrisylvanCountyofJUCBeforeme,thesubscriber,aNwhobeingØulyworn,dothdeposnthe4,ucSU.LLLri-riithattheadvertisement,ofwhichtearsintheeditionsofsaidnewspaper,inthereforataratehigherthanischargandsetinasimilarmanner,insaidnevSwonandsulscribdbeforenneLthLrie.Q..ta-k‘tibOLtonularadvertisingcolumnsofsaidnewspaper,3ndthattheCommonwealthisnotchargedaramountofmatteroccupyingsimilarspaceSoUREOFAFFIANT5oFPENNSYLVNOt1ilSealIieiftDonnNotaiyPublicIlIiytwUm,BucIcCotmtyIO3,2013ICOMMONWEALThOFPENNSIt.VANIASTP—52’lREV.12-88•PUB:LlCAiONSAuTHORlZAT1ONANDINVOICEINVOICENO.152169PUBLICATIONSAUTHORIZATION(Tobecompletedbyagency)TO(NAMEAND.ADORESSOFNEWSPAPER)FEERALI.D.NOj5OC.SEC.NO.FROM(NAMEANDADDRESSOFAGENCY)•AOENCYTELEPFIONENOBucksCo.CourierTimes:23—0433913YvetteN.House:717—787—94958400N.BristolPikeBureauofAirQu1L-tyLevittown,PA19057400MarketStreet,12thFir.Attn:Cindi,Harrisburg,PA17105HEREWITHISENCLOSEDCOPYFORPUOLICATIONOFADVERTISEMENTFORPROPOSALSTOTYPEOFADjEMPLOYPURCHASECONTRACTESELLCLS5IF1EDLEGALNOTICEPUBLiSHADVERTISEMENT(NO.OFTIMESIMAXIMUMNO,OFLiNESDATEORDERNO,1“...‘‘,Nov.17,2009NOTICEproposedReViSIOfl10Plflfl5YlVofl5StateImplemefltOliOflPlanincOrparatIngtheDieseIpoweredMotorVehicleIdilaSAct;PublicHearingISIGNSOEFORAGENCYdvertisementinyournewspaper,subjecttothetermsofthisorder,asusingcolumns,nopositionspecified;captionoftwolinesandsignaturebesetsolidintyperegularlyusedby_yournewspaperforpublic(legal)ledtoandpaidbycommercialadvertisersformattersimilarlysetandeditionsspecifiedabove.Vendoragreesthat,intheperformanceofanyriminateagainstanyemployeorotherpersonsonaccountofrace,color,thattheCommonwealth,uponreceiptofsatisfactoryevidenceofsuch‘urnthiscopyatonceifyouwillnotacceptthisadvertisementunderthetermsstbeincludedonParts1,2&3.Returnoriginalandtwocopies(signed1mustbenotarized.Part4isyours.3fprintedlinespublished.011(1COSTFUNCTIONO8JAMOUNTI/a&o9eic?Ic’t’JALNO.OFPRINTEDLINESCOSTPERLINETOTALAMOUNTiosGRANDTOTAL-8”-.,NOTARYPUBLIC(71?)737-9495oyhouse@state.pa.tsTOOusersmaYcontacttheAT&TRelaYServiceat(800)6545984todiscussNOWDEPconbestaccommodatetheirneeds.Mycommissionexpires*ThisaffidnvkmustbemadebytheOwner,Publisi..:IwII1P.SQIUQflGifotaijes•_____‘1•7’•?J-:--.—.—4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 20, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), DVD Copy Control Association (“DVD CCA”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, APTIV Services, LLC, Troy, MI; Deluxe Digital Studios Inc., Burbank, CA; and Sunext Technology Corporation Limited, Hsin-Chu, TAIWAN, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 15, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 22, 2023 (88 FR 57130).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-02250 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report datedMarch 16, 2006 (except for Note 17 as to which the date is March 27, 2006), accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of EP MedSystems, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of EP MedSystems, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-346656, effective April 13, 2000, amendedJune 29, 2000; File No. 333-122081, effective January 14, 2005) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-104231, effective April 21, 2003; File No. 333-110023, effective November 19, 2003, File No. 333-112131, effectiveFebruary 4, 2004; File No. 333-120263, effective November 26, 2004 and File No. 333-122082, effective February 3, 2005 ). 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 27, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6433

CLIVERT LINDSAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. E. GUNJA, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-01-586-WMN)

Submitted: July 3, 2001 Decided: July 27, 2001

Before WIDENER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clivert Lindsay, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Lindsay v. Gunja, No. CA-01-586-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 2, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Austin L. CURTIS, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 02-3200.

United States Court'of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 16, 2002.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1), and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, and to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
II

Calendar No. 86

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 493

[Report No. 104–64]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of

documentation for the vessel CONSORTIUM.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mr. CHAFEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

APRIL 18, 1995

Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of April 6 (legislative

day, April 5), 1995, by Mr. PRESSLER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation for the vessel CONSORTIUM.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF CERTIFICATE OF DOCU4 MENTATION.

5 Notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

6 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer-
2

S 493 RS

1 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica2 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

3 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

4 for the vessel CONSORTIUM, United States official num5 ber 1029192.

Calendar No. 86

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 493

[Report No. 104–64]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

CONSORTIUM.issue a certificate of documentation for the vessel

APRIL 18, 1995

Reported without amendment
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 532

To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 10 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. VENUE.

4 Paragraph (3) of section 1391(a) of title 28, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the defendants are’’

6 and inserting ‘‘any defendant is’’.

Æ
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6968** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JOHN LEE BOYD, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington
. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 5:93

- cr - 00123

- F

- 3 )

Submitted : August 26, 2010 Decided: September 7, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by u n published per curiam opinion
. John Lee Boyd, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Le e Boyd , Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his motion to enforce the plea agreement . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. B oyd , No. 5:93

- cr - 00123

- F

- 3 (E.D.N.C. June 30, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 30, 2008



/S/ DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. Passeri President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Prologue (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Steve Cuthbert, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,
as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.


   /s/ Steve Cuthbert
   Steve Cuthbert
   President, Chief Executive Officer, CFO
   August 12, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8244-8245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open Mobile Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 11, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open Mobile Alliance 
(``OMA'') filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its 
membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Aetheros, 
Sausalito, CA; AVSystem sp.zo.o., Krak[oacute]w, POLAND; Bulk Tainer 
Telematics Ltd., Stokesley, UNITED KINGDOM; HMD Global Oy, Espoo, 
FINLAND; Hydro- Qu[eacute]bec, Varennes, CANADA; Landis+Gyr Technology, 
Inc., Alpharetta, GA; Software AG, Darmstadt, GERMANY; Weihai Ploumeter 
Co., LTD, Weihai, Shandong Province, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA have 
been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, ARM Ltd., San Jose, CA; Comtech Telecommunications Corp., 
Annapolis, MD; grandcentrix GmbH, Cologne, GERMANY; KTC Product AB, 
Askim, SWEDEN; Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, SWEDEN; Qualcomm 
Inc., San Diego, CA; Softbank Corp., Tokyo, JAPAN; Sporton 
International Inc., TaoYuan Hsien, TAIWAN; Telit Communications S.p.a.,

[[Page 8245]]

Sgonico, ITALY, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and OMA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 18, 1998, OMA filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on December 
31, 1998 (63 FR 72333).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 19, 
2022. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29386).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-02259 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

               SUBSIDIARIES OF APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.

1.       Applied Analytical Industries Italy, S.r.l.
2.       Applied Analytical Industries Deutschland GmbH
3.       AAI Vermogensverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
4.       L.A.B. Gesellschaft fur pharmakologische Untersuchungen mbH & Co.
5.       AAI UK Limited
6.       AAI Japan, Inc.
7.       AAI Technologies, Inc.
8.       AAI Properties, Inc.
9.       Applied Analytical Industries Learning Center, Inc.
10.      Kansas City Analytical Services, Inc.
11.      Medical and Technical Research Associates, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 353 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 353

 To clarify the circumstances under which a senior circuit court judge 
                may cast a vote in a case heard en banc.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 3 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Simon introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the circumstances under which a senior circuit court judge 
                may cast a vote in a case heard en banc.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28.

    Section 46(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new sentence: ``A circuit court judge who is 
in regular active service at the time of a rehearing en banc, but who 
retires from active service prior to the issuance of a decision, shall 
be competent to participate in such en banc decision.''.
                                 <all>
```
(see attached scope of accreditation for fields of testing and accredited test methods)Print Date: 12/21/2010Page 1 of 2This is to signify thatPROFESSIONAL SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.2710 WEST 5TH AVENUEEUGENE, OREGON 97402Testing Laboratory TL-280has met the requirements of the IAS Accreditation Criteria forTesting Laboratories (AC89), hasdemonstrated compliance withANS/ISO/IEC Standard 17025:2005,General criteria for the competence oftesting and calibration laboratories, and has beenaccredited, commencing November 11, 2010, for the test methods listed in the approved scope of accreditation.Patrick V. McCullen C. P. Ramani, P.E.Vice President PresidentProfessional Service Industries, Inc. TL-280November 11, 2010Commencement Date C. P. Ramani, P.E.PresidentPrint Date: 12/21/20102 of 2Professional Service Industries, Inc.Randy Webb2710 W 5th Ave.Director, Technical ServicesEugene, OR 97402(541) 484-9212FIELDS OF TESTING ACCREDITED TEST METHODSWood and wood-based products ASTM Standards D 143, D 198, D 905, D 1037, D 1101, D 1761, D 2395, D 2559,D 2718, D 3043, D 4442, D 4688, D 4761, D 5055, D 5516, D 6007, E 72, E 661and E 1333; UBC Standards 23-1 and 23-2; United States Department ofCommerce Product Standards PS-1 and PS-2; ANSI/HPVA Standards HP-1 andFTM 1-83; ANSI A208.1 and 208.2