alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/Afor the quarter ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John H. Jungbauer, VicePresident Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: March  22, 2004 | By:                                                  | /s/ John H.  Jungbauer |   |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                   | John H.  Jungbauer                                   |
|                   | Vice  President Finance and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and

Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors

so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

Nos. 14-BG-1143 & 15-BG-400

IN RE: MARK A. SGARLATA,

Respondent.

Bar Registration No. 418557 BDN: 247-14 & BDN: 33-15

BEFORE: Thompson, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Farrell, Senior Judges. 

ORDER

(FILED – July 23, 2015)

On consideration of the certified order revoking respondent’s license to

practice law in the state of Virginia, this court’s May 18, 2015, order suspending

respondent pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why

the functional equivalent reciprocal discipline in the form of disbarment should not

be imposed, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, it

appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court’s order to show

cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), and it further appearing

that respondent has a separate pending bar disciplinary matter, no. 14-BG-1143, that

involves the same criminal conviction, it is 

ORDERED that Mark A. Sgarlata is hereby disbarred from the practice of law

in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and In re

Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption ofidenticalreciprocal

discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that bar disciplinary case no. 14-BG-1143 is hereby

dismissed as moot. It is
Nos. 14-BG 1143 & 15-BG-400

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period that must

pass before one is eligible to file for reinstatement will not begin to run until such

time as he files a D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 99.1

Co-Registrant (Commission File Number 000-30761):    UbiquiTel Inc.  One West Elm Street  Suite 400  Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428    Co-Registrant (Commission File Number
333-39950):    UbiquiTel Operating Company  One West Elm Street  Suite 400  Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating Company on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald A. Harris, Chief Executive Officer of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel
Operating Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of UbiquiTel Inc. and UbiquiTel Operating
Company.

| |  | UBIQUITEL INC.             
| |  | ---------------------------
| |  | By:                        
| |  | UBIQUITEL OPERATING COMPANY
| |  | By:                        
| |  |                            
| |  | November 13, 2002          

---

QuickLinks
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 03-6133



# 

J AMES C LAUDE B AILEY ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-00-21, CA-02-93)

Submitted: June 16, 2003

Decided: June 27, 2003
Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL
James Claude Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION

PER CURIAM:James Claude Bailey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the movant can demonstrate both "(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’" Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 941 (2001). As to Bailey’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims, the district court denied those claims because they were not raised in Bailey’s direct appeal. At the time it issued its decision, the district court did not have the benefit of Massaro v. United States , __ U.S. __, 123 S.Ct. 1690, 1696 (2003) (holding that failure to raise ineffective assistance of counsel claims on direct appeal does not bar movant from raising such claims in a § 2255 motion). While we conclude that jurists of reason could debate the correctness of the district court’s procedural ruling, we have independently reviewed the record andconclude that Bailey has not demonstrated the denial of a constitutional right as to his ineffective assistance of counsel claims. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , __ U.S. __, 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). The district court denied the remainder of Bailey’s claims because he failed to raise them on direct appeal. We have independentlyreviewed the record and conclude that Bailey has not made the requisite showing to obtain a certificate of appealability as to those claims. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED 2 U NITED S TATES v. B AILEY
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify
that to the undersigned's knowledge:

     3)   the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
          30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4)   the information contained in the Company's quarterly report on Form
          10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                          /s/ Frank Burke
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Frank Burke
                                          Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 14, 2002
Exhibit 10(lll)


                      DESCRIPTION OF CONSULTING PLAN


     On June 21, 1996 the Board of Directors adopted a consulting
plan not set forth in a formal document (the "Plan").  The Plan
provided for the compensation of individuals retiring from
service on the Company's Board of Directors in consideration for
consulting services to be rendered to the Company following their
retirement from the Board.  The Plan, which was applicable only
to directors retiring from the Board after June 21, 1996,
provided for the payment to an eligible director of a consulting
fee for his services at the annual rate of $20,000 for a period
of up to five years commencing on the date of his retirement from
the Board (the "Consulting Term").  Under the Plan, a retiring
director was entitled to receive the fee during the Consulting
Term only so long as he continued to be available to provide
consulting service to the Company.  No compensation was payable
to, or for the account of, a retired director subsequent to his
becoming unavailable to consult with the Company, on account of
his death or otherwise.  The Plan was terminated by the Board of
Directors effective April 25, 1997.  As a result of such
termination no director retiring from the Board after April 25,
1997 is entitled to any benefit under the Plan.  See Item 11 of
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended January 31, 1997 for information concerning the Company's
settlement of its obligations to three retired directors pursuant
to the Plan.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 302

To make a technical correction to section 11501(h)(2) of title 49, United

States Code.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 31 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To make a technical correction to section 11501(h)(2) of

title 49, United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 11501(h)(2) of title 49,

5 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the

6 following:

7 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at

8 the end;

9 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and
2

•S 302 IS

1 (3) by adding at the end the following:

2 ‘‘(C) does not apply to the authority of a

3 political subdivision of a State to enact or en4 force a law, regulation, or other provision relat5 ing to the transportation for hire of a motor ve6 hicle by a tow truck, if such transportation is

7 performed—

8 ‘‘(i) at the request of a law enforce9 ment officer; or

10 ‘‘(ii) without the prior consent or au11 thorization of the owner or operator of the

12 motor vehicle.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend15 ment made by section 601(c) of the Federal Aviation Ad16 ministration Authorization Act of 1994.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0620 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEVEN JAMES CLIFTON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 24, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 18 2022

07/18/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0620
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTEC1"'ON AGENCY REGION 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 Seattle, WA 98101-3140

OFFICE OF AIR, WASTE AND TOXICS October 14,2010 Mr. Brad Broker Air QualityMonitoring Coordinator Idaho Department ofEnvironmental Quality 1410North Hilton Boise, ID 83706-1255
DearMr. Broker:
We have evaluated the 2010Idaho Ambient Air Monitoring Network Plan, which describes the Idaho monitoring network for 2010-11. IDEQ proposes the following changes to the airmonitoring network: 1) DEQ proposes to initiate PMcoarse monitoring at the Meridian S1. Luke's NCore site, beginningJanuary 1, 2011, and report this data to AQS. DEQ will calculate PMcoarse concentrationsby calculating the mass differencebetween datacollected from the existing PM2.5 FRM at S1. Luke's, and the PMWFRMproposedfor that site. EPA approves this change. 2) DEQproposes increasing the sampling frequency at the Salmon PM2.5 monitoring site to daily (1: 1). The monitor currently operates everythird day (1:3). EPA approves this change.
The following monitors are designated "core" monitors because they are either: 1) required by40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, 2) have a design value nearor above the new PM2.5 24-hour standard of35ug/m3, or 3) they are essential monitoring parameters at NCore sites: 1. PM2.5 FRMs (orApproved Regional Method): a) Nampa (primary and co-located) b) MeridianlS1. Luke's Hospital c) Pinehurst d) Salmon e) Franklin t) StMaries 2. PM2.5 speciation monitors and pre-cursor gas monitors at the MeridianlS1. Luke's Hospital NCore site.
"Core" monitors are those monitors in the network that mustbe operated with available PM2.5 monitoring funds. The "non-core" PM2.5 monitors in the State'snetwork can be operated at IDEQ's discretion with any remaining federal funds or State funds. Ifyou have any questions about our approval ofthe Idaho monitoring network, please contact Keith Rose at (206) 553-1949.



# o Ptillredon R«;yC/edPtIP8I'

### Sincerely,

# D~Cti(1~l State and Tribal

# prograr:t~~r . ­

cc: Mike McGown, 100 Bruce Louks, IDEQ Keith Rose, OAWT Chris Hall, OEA

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter F. Wilkniss,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


May 15, 2006                                       By:  /s/ PETER F. WILKNISS
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Peter F. Wilkniss
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 251

 To make provisions of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 applicable to 
                               Cambodia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 19 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

  Mr. McCain introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make provisions of title IV of the Trade Act of 1974 applicable to 
                               Cambodia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF TRADE ACT OF 1974 TO CAMBODIA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, title IV of the Trade 
Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2431 et seq.) shall apply for purposes of 
determining the eligibility of the products of Cambodia to receive 
nondiscriminatory (most favored-nation) trade treatment.
                                 <all>
```
IB

Union Calendar No. 436

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 533

[Report No. 104–799]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 11, 1995

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

SEPTEMBER 17, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal

court, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL.

4 The first sentence of section 1447(c) of title 28,

5 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘any defect
2

•S 533 RH

1 in removal procedure’’ and inserting ‘‘any defect other

2 than lack of subject matter jurisdiction’’.

Passed the Senate June 30 (legislative day, June

19), 1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.

Union Calendar No. 436

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 533

[Report No. 104–799]

AN ACT

To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to

Federal court, and for other purposes.

SEPTEMBER 17, 1996

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #20181 and #20182; NEW YORK Disaster Number NY-20007]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of New York (FEMA-4755-DR), dated 01/30/2024. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding.
                        ( print page 8734) *Incident Period:*
                         09/28/2023 through 09/30/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 01/30/2024. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/01/2024. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         10/31/2024.
 ADDRESSES: *Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Morgan, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 01/30/2024, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Kings, Nassau, Westchester. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 201816 and for economic injury is 201820. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Francisco Sánchez, Jr., Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.


[FR Doc. 2024-02546 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
**Docket Number F AA**  **- 2014**  **- 0570**
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT 21

                              BAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





The following are subsidiaries of Bar Technologies Inc. as of January 3, 1998:


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     STATE OR OTHER
                                                     JURISDICTION OF              PERCENT
NAME                                                 INCORPORATION              OWNERSHIP
----                                                 -------------              ---------

<S>                                                  <C>                         <C> 
Bliss & Laughlin Industries Inc.                     Delaware                        100%
         Bliss & Laughlin Steel Company*             Delaware                        100%
         Canadian Drawn Steel Company*               Canada                          100%
</TABLE>








*  Wholly-owned subsidiary of Bliss & Laughlin Industries Inc.
Order entered October 6, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00354
- CV WHITE NILE SOFTWARE, INC., Appellant

V. JEFFREY M. TRAVIS , ET AL. , Appellee s On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 17108

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 2, 2020 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file its reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 9, 2020

.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE