alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joe B. SIMMONS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. Aubrey Ray DARDEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee (2 cases). Robert CATHCART, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee (6 cases).

Nos. 35694, 35699-35700, 35702-35707.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 24, 1963.

Jack Little, Big Spring, for Joe B. Simmons.

George T. Thomas and Roger D. Brown Big Spring, for other appellants.

*944Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The appeals in the above styled and numbered causes raise the same fact situations and the same questions of law as were raised in Minchew v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 366 S.W.2d 942, except that some of the above appeals were from the corporation court.

For the same reasons and upon the same authorities, and subject to the same right to seek relief by mandamus, the judgment in each of the above causes dismissing the appeal to the County Court is affirmed.
Exhibit 10(bbb)




AMENDED AND RESTATED PROMISSORY NOTE
  May 13, 2011
  
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, CEL-SCI Corporation (Borrower) promises to pay to Maximilian de Clara or order (Note Holder) $1,104.057, together with interest on the unpaid principal balance from the date of this note until paid, at the rate of 15% per annum.
  This Note, together with all accrued but unpaid interest, shall be due and payable on the first to occur of the following:
  ●
July 6, 2015; or●
upon 10 days written notice to Borrower.
  Principal and interest shall be payable at the following address, or such other place as the Note Holder may designate:
  Maximilian de Clara
 6078 Lungem (OV)
 Bergstrasse 79
 Switzerland
  In consideration for prior extensions of this Note, Borrower and Note  Holder acknowledge that the Borrower has issued the following warrants to the Note Holder:
  Shares Issuable Upon Exercise of Warrant
Per Share Exercise Price
Expiration Date1,648,244
$0.40
12-24-141,849,298
$0.50
1-6-15
  Payments received for application to this Note shall be applied first to the payment of costs and expense of collection and/or suit, if any, second to the payment of accrued interest specified above, and the balance applied in reduction of the principal amount hereof.
  Ifthis Note is not paid when due, the Note Holder shall be entitled to collect all reasonable costs and expense of collection and/or suit, including, but not limited to reasonable attorneys'  fees.
  Borrower may not prepay the principal amount outstanding under this note, in whole or in part, at any time without the written consent of the holder.
    Borrower and all other makers, sureties, guarantors, and endorsers hereby waive presentment, notice of dishonor and protest, and they hereby agree to any extensions of time of payment and partial payments before, at, or after maturity.
  The amounts due pursuant to this Note are secured by all of the Borrower's assets.
  Any notice to Borrower provided for this Note shall be in writing and  shall be  given and be effective upon (1) delivery to Borrower, (2) by e-mail as long as the e-mail receipt was acknowledged or (3) mailing such notice by mail or couriers such as FedEx, addressed to Borrower at the Borrower's address states below, or to such other address as Borrower may designate by notice to the Note Holder. Any notice to the Note Holder shall be in writing and shall be given and be effective upon (1) delivery to Borrower, (2) by e-mail as long as the e-mail receipt was acknowledged or (3) mailing such notice by mail or couriers such as FedEx, to the Note Holder at the address stated above, or to such other address as Note Holder may designate by notice to Borrower.
  This amended and restated promissory note supersedes in its entirety the following:
 
  CEL-SCI CORPORATION
  By: /s/Geert R. Kersten
 Geert R. Kersten, Chief Executive Officer
  
 ADDRESS OF BORROWER
  8229 Boone Boulevard, Suite 802
 Vienna, VA 22182, USA
 703-506-9460
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4747-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

      ( print page 8229)    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Kansas (FEMA-4747-DR), dated October 26, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued December 19, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Kansas is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 26, 2023.

Phillips County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-02372 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00316

- CR

JEREMY NEWCOMER

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

On a ppeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 10

- CR

- 3888

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. January 30, 2014

.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 2081

GEORGE WILLIAM OGOLA ODERO

,

Petitioner

,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : April 19, 2018 Decided: May 3, 2018

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rishi P. Oza, ROBERT BROWN LLC, Cleveland, Ohio , for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant Director, Steven K. Uejio

, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding prec edent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

George William Ogola Odero

, a native and citizen of Kenya , petitions for review of

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the

immigration judge’s decision finding him removable u nder 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(3)(D)(i)

(2012) (providing that an alien “who falsely represents, or has falsely represented, himself

to be a citizen of the United States for any purpose or benefit under this chapter . . . or any

Fed eral or State law is deportable ” ).

The Government bears the burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence

that Odero is removable. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(3)(A) (2012). Based on our thorough

review of the record and Odero’s assignments of error, we agree with the agency tha t the

Government met its burden of proof in this case. We therefore deny the petition for review

for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Odero (B.I.A. Aug. 28, 2017). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate ly presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00010-CR

JOSEPH LUNA 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 11CR3639-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 6, 2014
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in theCompany’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 13, 2008 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                          COINMACH LAUNDRY CORPORATION
 
                         COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
 
                (IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   SIX-MONTH
                                                   TRANSITION
                                      YEAR ENDED  PERIOD ENDED APRIL 5, 1995 TO
                                      MARCH 28,    MARCH 29,    SEPTEMBER 29,
                                         1997         1996           1995
                                      ----------  ------------ ----------------
<S>                                   <C>         <C>          <C>
LOSS AVAILABLE TO STOCKHOLDERS:
  Loss before extraordinary items.... $  (10,227)  $   (2,523)    $   (6,116)
  Extraordinary items, net...........       (296)      (8,925)
                                      ----------   ----------     ----------
  Net loss........................... $  (10,523)  $  (11,448)    $   (6,116)
                                      ==========   ==========     ==========
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING:
  Common shares......................  9,232,530    7,774,017      7,774,017
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
  Loss before extraordinary items.... $    (1.11)
  Extraordinary items, net...........      (0.03)
                                      ----------
  Net loss........................... $    (1.14)
                                      ==========
PRO FORMA EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
  Loss before extraordinary items....              $    (0.32)    $    (0.79)
  Extraordinary items, net...........                   (1.15)           --
                                                   ----------     ----------
  Net loss...........................              $    (1.47)    $    (0.79)
                                                   ==========     ==========
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ending May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Al Hayes certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed as of July 21,
2008.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Al Hayes                                                    
|Al Hayes Chief Executive Officer and
principal financial officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by

the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
VI

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 514

For the relief of the heirs, successors, or assigns of Sadae Tamabayashi.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of the heirs, successors, or assigns of Sadae

Tamabayashi.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT REQUIRED.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec5 retary of the Treasury shall pay, out of any money in the

6 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the sum of $1,953

7 to the heirs, successors, and assigns of Sadae

8 Tamabayashi, as their interests may appear, in full satis9 faction of all of their claims against the United States for

10 the destruction or loss of property of Sadae Tamabayashi

11 resulting from the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Ha-
2

S 514 IS

1 waii, on December 7, 1941, or from the defense of Oahu

2 against such attack. The Comptroller General of the

3 United States shall determine and certify to the Secretary

4 of the Treasury the status of any person as such an heir,

5 successor, or assigneee and the interest of that person in

6 the total amount to be paid under the preceding sentence.

7 SEC. 2. LIMITATION.

8 Notwithstanding any contract to the contrary, it shall

9 be unlawful to pay or deliver to any agent or attorney,

10 and for any agent or attorney to receive, on account of

11 services rendered in connection with the claims paid pur12 suant to section 1, any amount exceeding 10 percent of

13 the amount so paid. Violation of the provisions of this sec14 tion is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed

15 $1,000.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 603

  To nullify an executive order that prohibits Federal contracts with 
companies that hire permanent replacements for striking employees, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 23, 1995

 Mr. Faircloth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To nullify an executive order that prohibits Federal contracts with 
companies that hire permanent replacements for striking employees, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. NULLIFICATION OF ORDER.

    Any executive order, or other rule or order, that--
            (1) prohibits Federal contracts between the United States 
        and a contractor;
            (2) requires the debarment of a contractor from an award of 
        a Federal contract; or
            (3) imposes other sanction on a contractor,
on the basis that such contractor or organizational unit thereof has 
permanently replaced lawfully striking employees of such contractor 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Cecil Weldon Holland, * From the 104th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 18199B.

Vs. No. 11-13-00361-CR * November 30, 2015

The State of Texas, * Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this cause to the 

trial court for further proceedings.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark R. Richards, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Paperweight Development
Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paperweight Development Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2007



|           |  |                                                
|---------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                           
|           |  | Mark R. Richards                               
|           |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

October 12, 2016

No. 10-16-00047-CR

RODERICK CARVON BLEDSOE

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-392-C1

**JUDGMENT**

	This Court has reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record in this proceeding as relevant to the issue raised and finds no reversible error is presented.  Accordingly the trial court’s Judgment of Conviction by Court—Waiver of Jury Trial as to Count III, Endangering a Child, signed on February 9, 2016, is affirmed.

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

			By: ___________________________

				Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT 11
EXECUTONE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)


                                                   		Years Ended December 31,
	                                                   	1996	 	 	1995		  	1994

<S>                                                   <C>      <C>      <C>
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
	Before Extraordinary Item                       	$ 24,162 	$(36,934) 	$6,734
Discontinued Operations:
	Income From Operations, Net of Taxes                	---     	---	      153
	Gain on Disposal, Net of Taxes	                      ---     	---	      604
Extraordinary Item, Net of Taxes	                    (355)	    ---	      ---

Net Income (Loss)                                 $ 23,807	 $(36,934)  $7,491

Weighted Average Number of Common
	Shares Outstanding	                                51,712	   46,919	  43,705


Common Stock Equivalent Shares Assumed
	to be Issued for Dilutive Stock Options and
	Warrants	                                          $ 539    	$ ---	   $3,992

Total Weighted Average Common and
	Common Equivalent Shares Outstanding	              52,251	   46,919	  47,697

Earnings (Loss) per Common Share:
	Continuing Operations	                             $ 0.46	   $(0.79)  $ 0.14
	Discontinuing Operations	                            0.00	     0.00	    0.02
	Extraordinary Item	                                 (0.01)     0.00	    0.00

	Net Income (Loss)                                 	$ 0.45	   $(0.79)  $ 0.16

</TABLE>
<PAGE>