alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<CIK>                                                   0001012704
<NAME>                                         Ugly Duckling Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000


<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                          APR-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                       1,652
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               79,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 5,950
<INVENTORY>                                                 34,690
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      33,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                               6,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             137,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       95,055
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                   173,562
<OTHER-SE>                                                  10,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               278,845
<SALES>                                                     69,523
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            80,766
<CGS>                                                       40,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            21,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            14,274
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              4,353
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 1,763
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          2,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 352
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 2,942
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.16



</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1843/2006

of 14 December 2006         

fixing the maximum export refund for butter in the framework of the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 581/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of Article 31(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the permanent tender opened by Regulation (EC) No 581/2004, for the tendering period ending on 12 December 2006, the maximum amount of refund for the products referred to in Article 1(1) of that Regulation shall be as shown in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 64. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 975/2006 (OJ L 176, 30.6.2006, p. 69).

(3)OJ L 90, 27.3.2004, p. 58. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1814/2005 (OJ L 292, 8.11.2005, p. 3).

----

ANNEX

----
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Communicate.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Geoffrey Hampson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ C Geoffrey HampsonC Geoffrey Hampson 
Chief Executive Officer 
August 14, 2007
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-10598

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOMMY MERREL JACKSON, also known as TJ;

DICKEY JOE JACKSON, also known as Joe Jackson;

CHARLES ALLEN HOUSE; also known as Chuck House,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CR-148-A

- - - - - - - - - -

April 15, 1997

Before GARWOOD, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tommy Merrel Jackson (Tommy) and Charles Allen House (House)

were convicted of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute

methamphetamine. Dickey Joe Jackson (Dickey) was convicted of

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine,

possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, being a

felon in possession of a firearm, and possession of an

unregistered firearm.
No. 96-10598

- 2 -

Dickey, who received a life sentence, argues that the

district court erred by attributing 81.6 kilograms of

methamphetamine to him and that the district court erred in not

departing downward in sentencing him. He is incorrect. United

States v. Maseratti, 1 F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1993), cert.

denied, 510 U.S. 1129 (1994); United States v. Angulo, 927 F.2d

202, 204-05 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Burleson, 22 F.3d

93, 95 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 283 (1994).

Tommy contends that the district court erred by attributing

81.6 kilograms of methamphetamine to him, by finding that he used

a weapon as defined under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), and by

determining that he was a leader or organizer of the

methamphetamine conspiracy. His contentions are without merit. 

United States v. Maseratti, 1 F.3d 330, 340 (5th Cir. 1993),

cert. denied, 510 U.S. 1129 (1994); United States v. Angulo, 927

F.2d 202, 204-05 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v. Mitchell, 31

F.3d 271, 277 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 455 (1994); 

United States v. Elwood, 999 F.2d 814, 817 (5th Cir. 1993).

House argues that the district court erred in denying his

motions to suppress evidence and that the court abused its

discretion by denying his motion for a severance of the trial. 

His contentions are also without merit. United States v. Leon,

468 U.S. 897, 922-23 (1984); United States v. Kelley, 981 F.2d

1464, 1470 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 2427 (1993);

United States v. Kane, 887 F.2d 568, 573 (5th Cir. 1989), cert.
No. 96-10598

- 3 -

denied 493 U.S. 1090 (1990).

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION

I, Rahim Rayani, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gulf Coast Oil
         & Gas, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
         untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
         necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
         under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
         the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
         information included in this report, fairly present in all material
         respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
         of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
         and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
         15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this annual report is being prepared;
(b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures; and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
         likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
         financial reporting; and

5.       I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
         control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
         audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
         performing the equivalent functions):

(a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which adversely
         affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
         report financial information; and
(b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.


Date:  July 13, 2006


                                          Rahim Rayani
                                          Chief Executive Officer and President
                                          Chief Financial Officer


                                      -17-
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Marshall D. Sorokwasz, certify that:
1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterended May 31, 2004 of Impreso, Inc. (the “Report”); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by the Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in the Report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthe Report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by the Report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in the Report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
6. Item 4 Controls and Procedures in the Company’s Form 10-Q isincorporated herein by reference.        Date: July 15, 2004/s/ Marshall D. Sorokwasz  **Marshall D. Sorokwasz**   **Chief Executive Officer and President**
1 Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases
on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless
expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 95-20071 Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

RAYMOND HAYDEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

CA H 93 2422

______________________________________________________ June 23, 1995 Before DUHÉ, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Raymond Hayden, a Texas Depa rtment of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division, inmate sued several representatives of the

institution alleging numerous violations of his Constitutional

rights. Two of the Defendants answered the complaint. Two did

not. The district court held a hearing pursuant to S pears v

.

McCotter
, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985), and dismissed the claims as2

fri volous under § 1915(d). Hayden appeals. We find his appeal

frivolous and dismiss it.

Appellant lists seven issues which we treat in four groups:

He first contends that it was error for the district court to

dismiss h is complaint when two Defendants had failed to respond.

However, it is clear that a court may dismiss a frivolous complaint

before responsive pleadings are filed. Schultea v. Wood , 47 F.3d

1427, 1434 (5th Cir. 1995) (en banc).

Hayden next complains of the dismissal of his complaint of

inadequate medical care. We have carefully reviewed the record and

find that it does not support a finding of deliberate indifference

to his serious medical needs. This is the standard he must meet to

prevail. Estelle v. Gamble , 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976).

Appellant's next contention is that it was er ror to dismiss

his complaints that prison officials were deliberately indifferent

to his working conditions. However his allegations concerning his

fall from the trailer, assuming their truthfulness, amoun t to no

more than negli gence. This will not support a Constitutional

claim.

Finally, Appellant contends that the court violated 42 U.S.C.

§ 1997e because it did not afford him an impartial hearing. This

secti on addresses prison administrative proceedings and is not

relevant to district court proceedings.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 503

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to impose a moratorium

on the listing of species as endangered or threatened and the designation

of critical habitat in order to ensure that constitutionally protected private property rights are not infringed, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 6, 1995

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to impose

a moratorium on the listing of species as endangered

or threatened and the designation of critical habitat in

order to ensure that constitutionally protected private

property rights are not infringed, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Endangered Species

5 Listing Moratorium Act of 1995’’.
2

•S 503 IS

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON DETERMINATION OF ENDAN2 GERED SPECIES AND THREATENED SPECIES

3 AND DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT.

4 Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973

5 (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)) is amended by adding at the end the

6 following:

7 ‘‘(4) MORATORIUM.—Notwithstanding para8 graphs (1) and (3), during the period beginning on

9 March 7, 1995, and ending on September 7, 1995,

10 the Secretary may not—

11 ‘‘(A) determine that a species is an endan12 gered species or a threatened species under

13 paragraph (1); or

14 ‘‘(B) designate habitat of a species to be

15 critical habitat under paragraph (3).’’.

Æ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 3, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-11164

Summary Calendar

 

TERRENCE L. SWANSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM E. GONZALEZ, Dr.; MIKE BRANIGAN, Medical Director,

ROY FISHER, III, Dr.; CHERYL GARY, NP; MICHAEL UPSHAW,

Warden; TINA CARMONA, Asst. Warden; WHYATT, Directory of

Classification; ROBERT S. SEAGROVES, Capt.; TEXAS TECH

UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER; TDCJ ROACH UNIT,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:02-CV-143

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terrence L. Swanson, Texas prisoner #1036801, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Because he did

not file his step 2 grievance until after he filed the instant

complaint, the district court did not err in dismissing the

complaint. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Underwood v. Wilson, 151 F.3d

292, 293-96 (5th Cir. 1998). 
No.

-2-

AFFIRMED.
This page intentionally 

left blank

This page intentionally 

left blank

This page intentionally 

left blank

This page intentionally 

left blank

This page intentionally 

left blank

This page intentionally 

left blank

This page intentionally 

left blank

















































































































This page intentionally 

left blank
This page intentionally 

left blank
This page intentionally 

left blank
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of uWink, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nolan K. Bushnell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


July 19, 2006                                        By: /s/ NOLAN K. BUSHNELL
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Nolan K. Bushnell
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.3


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT


To the Board of Directors
Medical & Technical Research Associates, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Medical & Technical Research
Associates, Inc. as of December 31, 1997, and the related statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Medical & Technical Research
Associates, Inc. as of December 31, 1997, and the results of its operations and
its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.


/s/ ROGERS, SULESKI & ASSOCIATES, LLC


Needham Heights, Massachusetts
February 20, 1998
Order entered January 8 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00847 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N.K.R.M., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dal las County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 17 - 20137

ORDER As directed to do so, appellant has filed written verification he has made payment arrangements with the court reporter for preparation of the reporter’s record

. Accordingly, we ORDER Glenda Fink ley, Official Court Reporter for the 256 th Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record no later than January 2 6 , 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE