alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



As adopted pursuant to



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Park Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 7, 2006 (the Report), I, David A. Remijas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. RemijasDavid A. RemijasPresident and Chief Executive OfficerApril 7, 2006
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           | APPLETON PAPERS INC. |
|--------------------------------|----------------------|
|                           |                 |   |
| Dated:  May 12, 2011 |                 |   /s/ Thomas J. Ferree |
|                           | Name:                | Thomas J. Ferree |
|                           | Title:               | Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1650

BISMARK KWAKU TORKORNOO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NINA HELWIG, Esq.; JOHN MONAHAN, Esq.; MARY TORKORNOO; 

JACQUELINE NGOLE, Esq.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. 

(8:15-cv-02652-TDC)

Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: December 8, 2016

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo, Appellant Pro Se. Nina Helwig, John 

Monahan, Jacqueline Ngole, Appellees Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bismark Kwaku Torkornoo appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his civil action on the basis of the Rooker-Feldman∗

doctrine after finding that Torkornoo’s claims arose out of or 

were inextricably intertwined with prior state court proceedings. 

Subsequent to the district court’s order, we clarified the narrow 

scope of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine in Thana v. Bd. Of License 

Commissioners for Charles City, 827 F.3d 314 (4th Cir. 2016), 

explaining that the doctrine does not apply “if a plaintiff in 

federal court does not seek review of the state court judgment 

itself but instead presents an independent claim” that is related 

to a matter decided by a state court. Id. at 320 (internal 

quotation marks and emphasis omitted). Instead, “any tensions 

between the two proceedings should be managed through the doctrines 

of preclusion, comity, and abstention.” Id.

Because the district court’s Rooker-Feldman analysis may be 

inconsistent with our recent clarification, we vacate its order 

and remand for reconsideration in light of Thana. We deny as moot

Appellee Monahan’s motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

 ∗ Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); D.C. Ct. of 

App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983). 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR R EHEARING

Appellate case name: Zachary J. Williams v. Max B. Mutia

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00 340

- CV

Trial court case number: 15

- DCV

- 227230

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

This Court’s October 15, 2019 memorandum opinion dismissed this case for

nonpayment of all required fees. The same day, appellant, Zachary J. Williams, filed a

motion for rehearing. Appellant paid the required fees on De cember 4, 2019. On December

17, 2019, t he Court requested a response to appellant’s motion from appellee, Max B.

Mutia, by January 10, 2020. To date, appellee has not filed a response.

A majority of the panel has voted to grant appellant’s timely motion f or rehearing.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.1, 49.3. The panel request s briefing in this case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3. Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion for rehearing. Appellant’s brief

is due on February 24, 2020

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

Acting for the Court

Date: January 23, 2020
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael P. Gray, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 3, 2010



/S/    MICHAEL P.
GRAYMichael P. Gray Chief
Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 464 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 30
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 464

To make the reporting deadlines for studies conducted in Federal court 
    demonstration districts consistent with the deadlines for pilot 
                   districts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 23 (legislative day, February 22), 1995

   Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. Heflin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

                             March 16, 1995

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make the reporting deadlines for studies conducted in Federal court 
    demonstration districts consistent with the deadlines for pilot 
                   districts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CIVIL JUSTICE EXPENSE AND DELAY REDUCTION 
              DEMONSTRATION PROGRAMS.

    Section 104 of the Civil Justice Reform Act of 1990 (28 U.S.C. 471 
note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ``4-year period'' and 
        inserting ``5-year period''; and
            (2) in subsection (d) by striking ``December 31, 1995,'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 1996,''.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 30

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 464

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To make the reporting deadlines for studies conducted in Federal court 
    demonstration districts consistent with the deadlines for pilot 
                   districts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 16, 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         107,474
<SECURITIES>                                       600
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,871
<PP&E>                                       4,001,642
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,639,486
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,513,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,584
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,497,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,513,027
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,016
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,750
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,266
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,266
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.08
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


We have issued our report dated February 25, 2000, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedules incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report of Xybernaut Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 1999. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statements of the Company on Forms S-3 (File No.
333-43693, effective January 30, 1998, File No. 333-52567, effective June 11,
1998, File No. 333-68859, effective January 25, 1999, File No. 333-77769,
effective May 17, 1999 and File No 333-80837, effective January 28, 2000) and on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-94463, effective January 12, 2000).


/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP

Vienna, Virginia
February 25, 2000
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert H.B.
Baldwin, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not deemed to be
filed for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: November 9, 2009



/s/

Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.President and Chief Financial Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 547

To extend the deadlines applicable to certain hydroelectric projects under

the Federal Power Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 14 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. SIMON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To extend the deadlines applicable to certain hydroelectric

projects under the Federal Power Act, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROJECT NUMBER 3943.

4 (a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding the time limita5 tions of section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

6 806), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (re7 ferred to in this Act as the ‘‘Commission’’), upon the re8 quest of the licensee for FERC Project No. 3943 (and

9 after reasonable notice), may extend the time required for

10 commencement of construction of such project for not
2

S 547 IS

1 more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods, in accordance

2 with subsections (b) and (c).

3 (b) CONDITIONS.—An extension may be granted

4 under subsection (a) only in accordance with—

5 (1) the good faith, due diligence, and public in6 terest requirements contained in section 13 of the

7 Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806); and

8 (2) the procedures of the Commission under

9 such section.

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect

11 for FERC Project No. 3943 upon the expiration of the

12 extension of the period required for commencement of con13 struction of such project issued by the Commission under

14 section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).

15 SEC. 2. PROJECT NUMBER 3944.

16 (a) EXTENSION.—Notwithstanding the time limita17 tions of section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

18 806), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, upon

19 the request of the licensee for FERC Project No. 3944

20 (and after reasonable notice), may extend the time re21 quired for commencement of construction of such project

22 for not more than 3 consecutive 2-year periods, in accord23 ance with subsections (b) and (c).

24 (b) CONDITIONS.—An extension may be granted

25 under subsection (a) only in accordance with—
3

S 547 IS

1 (1) the good faith, due diligence, and public in2 terest requirements contained in section 13 of the

3 Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806); and

4 (2) the procedures of the Commission under

5 such section.

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect

7 for FERC Project No. 3944 upon the expiration of the

8 extension of the period required for commencement of con9 struction of such project issued by the Commission under

10 section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806).

Æ
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T h e H o n o r ab le C a r lo s F . L u c e r o , U .S . C ir c u it Ju d g e f o rth e T e n th ** C i r c ui t , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AR ME N A P E L YA N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 77165 A ge nc yN o. A 097- 115- 644 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r8, 2009 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : S C HR OE DE R , L UC E R O , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. ** A rm e n A pe l y a n, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of A rm e ni a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B o ardo f Im m i g rat i o n A p p eal s’ s (“ B IA ”) d eci si o n up h o l d i n g th e ad v erse cr ed ib il ity f

in d in g o f th e I m m ig ra ti o n Ju d g e ( “IJ” ), an dth e d en ial o f p etit io n er ’s 

# FI LED FEB 18 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l a nd r e l i e f

unde rthe C onve nt i on A g a in s t T o rtu r e ( “C A T ” ) . T he B I A a f

f i rm e d be c aus e both pe t i t i one r ’ s w r i tt e n appl i c a t i on a nd he a r i ng t e s t i m ony , tha the w a s i m pr i s one d i n 1998 on s us pi c i on of pa rt i c i pa t i on i n apl ot f ora n a s s a s s i na t i on, w e r e i nc ons i s t e ntw i th the hi s t or i c a l r e c or d tha tthe a s s a s s in a tio n d idn o t o c c u ru n til 2 0 0 0 . T h e in c o n s is te n c yw e n t to th e h e a rt o f h is c la im , a s o u rla w r e q u ir e s in o r d e rto s up p o rt a n a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n . L i v . A s h c r o

ft , 3 7 8 F .3 d9 5 9 , 9 6 4 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W hen con fr on t ed atthe heari ng w i th the i ncon si st ency , pet i t i on ersa i d there h a db e e n am is ta k e in th e tr a n s la tio n s a n dth a t h e m e a n t to s a yh e w a s f a ls e ly arre st ed for s uspect ed pl anni ng , no tpart i cipat i on . N ei ther the IJno r the B IA a c c e p te dth e e x p la n a tio n a n dth e r e w a s n o c o m p e llin g r e a s o n f o rth e m to d o s o . D on v. G on zales , 4 7 6 F .3 d7 3 8 , 7 4 2 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . T h e p et i t i o n fo r rev i ew i s D EN I ED .
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Kathleen P. Bloch, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of PC Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
hereby amended,  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, as hereby amended, fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of PC Group,
Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:  May
      10, 2010
            /s/
      Kathleen P. BlochKathleen
      P. Bloch, Vice President andChief
      Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

PUBLIC MEDIA WORKS, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ThomasA. Szabo, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  January 13, 2005 | /s/  Thomas A. Szabo                  |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                    | Thomas  A. Szabo                      |
|                    | Chief  Executive Officer and Chairman |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

              SUBSIDIARIES OF APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.

1.  Applied Analytical Industries Italy, S.r.l.
2.  Applied Analytical Industries Deutschland GmbH
3.  AAI Applied Analytical Industries Deutschland Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
4.  AAI Applied Analytical Industries Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG
5.  AAI UK Limited
6.  AAI Japan, Inc.
7.  AAI Technologies, Inc.
8.  AAI Properties, Inc.
9.  Applied Analytical Industries Learning Center, Inc.
10. Kansas City Analytical Services, Inc.
11. Medical & Technical Research Associates, Inc.
12. Applied Analytical Industries Holdings Limited
EXHIBIT
32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification





The
undersigned officer certifies that this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Apogee Robotics,
Inc.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Apogee Robotics, Inc. and will be retained by
Apogee Robotics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





October
      14, 2008
            /s/ Zhenyu
      ShangZhenyu
      Shang (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer)
Controlling Fugitive Dust Emissions 

Compliance Assistance 

◦ Special Advisory: Drought Relief – Agricultural Operations

◦ Special Advisory: Drought Relief - Construction Sites

◦ Indirect Source Review (ISR) Program

◦ Fugitive Dust Control at Construction Sites

◦ Requirements on Paved and Unpaved Public Roads

◦ Products Available for Controlling Dust Emissions

◦ US Forest Service, Dust Palliative Selection and Application Guide

◦ Dust Control Training Course

◦ Attended Dust Control Training

◦ PM10-Efficient Street Sweepers

◦ Annual Average Daily Trips (AADT) of Selected Land Uses

◦ Don't Be Left in the Dust

◦ Regulation VIII Overview Brochure

Plans & Forms 

◦ Dust Control Plan 

◦ Construction Notification Form

◦ Record keeping Forms

◦ Fugitive PM10 Management Plans

◦ Rule 8061 Cities and Counties Road Report:

 - Acrobat Reader (pdf) or Word Document (doc)

◦ Rule 8061 Declaration of Financial Hardship Form

◦ Rule 8061 Incremental Progress Report Form:

: Acrobat Reader (pdf) or Spreadsheet (xls)

: Acrobat Reader (pdf) or Spreadsheet (xls)

: Acrobat Reader (pdf) or Spreadsheet (xls)

: Acrobat Reader (pdf) or Spreadsheet (xls)

Current Rules

◦ Regulation VIII

◦ Rule 8011 - General Requirements

◦ Rule 8021 - Construction, Demolition, Excavation, Extraction, and 

Other Earthmoving Activities

◦ Rule 8031 - Bulk Materials

◦ Rule 8041 - Carryout and Trackout

◦ Rule 8051 - Open Areas 

◦ Rule 8061 - Paved and Unpaved Roads

◦ Rule 8071 - Unpaved Vehicle/Equipment Traffic Areas

◦ Rule 8081 - Agricultural Sources

◦ Rule 3135 - Dust Control Plan Fee

Controlling Fugitive Dust Emissions Page 1 of

https://www.valleyair.org/busind/comply/PM10/compliance_PM10.htm / /