alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVED JULY 22, 2010
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF RODDYL.COX FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOGL0005 (Civil Penalty Action) DMS NO. FAA-2010-0623



### NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING
This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009-GL-l3-0033) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other

, communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List.

.Attachment

- Service ListFAA DocketNo. CPIOGL0005' (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

### ONE COPY Roddy 

### L. Cox, 

### Respondent 3918 S. Clay Street Green Bay, WI 54301 Christopher J
..Cherella 735W. WisconsinAvenue, 12th Floor Milwaukee, WI 53233 Chris G. Zurales, 

### Complainant's Counsel Senior Attorney Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East DevonAvenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 TEL: 847-294-7713 FAJ(: 847-294-7498 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20**~-~** 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.B. EastBUl O'und Floor RoomE12-320**-~** Washington, DC 20590 TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 FAJ(: 202366-7536

I Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
March 19, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ISAAC CARDALE LENSEY, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00745-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is 

capeable of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED to 

delete the specific amount of costs assessed.

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.