alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
d'

",,' 

## .......,

# . """" STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

STATE OF CONNECTICUT and BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDERNO. 8132 MODIFICATION
TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER MODIFICATION In the matter ofaTrading Agreement and Order between the Commissioner ofEnvironmental Protection ("Commissioner") and Bridgeport Hospital ("BH"). WHEREAS, the Commissioner and BH, having agreed to the tenns and conditions set forth in Trading Agreement and OrderNo. 8132 issued on September 10, 1996, do now, by mutual agreement, modify paragraphs AJ., 

### 8., C.I., C.2., C.2.D., C.2.G., C.4. and C.II. as follows: I. Change the date specified in paragraph A.3. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 2. Change the date specified in paragraph B. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 3. Change the third date specified in paragraph C.1. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 4. Change the second date specified in paragraph C.2. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 5. Change the date specified in paragraph C.2.D. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 6. Replace paragraph C.2.0. as follows: No later than March 1ofthe years 1999, 2000,2001,2002,2003 and 2004, include with its annual emissions report to the 

### Commissioner, NOx emissions and ERCs used for the previous calendar year, in monthly increments; 7. Change the date specified in paragraph C.4. from May I, 1999 to May 1,2003. 8. Change the date specified in paragraph C.ll. from May I, 1999 to May I, 2003.

lnitiais: Date: 

### 4.12·Cfj (Printed on Recycled Paper) 79 Elm Slfeel • Harlford, CT 06106 - 5127 tmp:lfdcp.SlitC.CI.us An Equol Opportunity Employer,

BRlDGEPORT HOSPITAL 

### 2 TRADING AGREEMENT AND ORDER NO. 8132 MODIFICATION


### All otherterms and conditions ofTracting Agreementand OrderNo. 8132 issued by 

### the Commissioner acting under Sections 22a-6, 22a-171, 22a-174, 22a-176, 22a-177 and 22a-178 of the Connecticut General Statutes shall remain in effect. 

### Bridgeport Hospital hereby consents to the entry ofthis modification to the Trading Agreement and Order without further notice.

.

# Br~ Signature:

## --"~""'-="'l"'-4d-:-_------ Type Name: Type Title: Date: 

### Entered as amodification ofan Orderofthe CommissionerofEnvironmental Protection numbered 8132 this 

# 29 day of

# !lpJ 1999.

rthur 1. Rocque, Jr. 

### Commissioner CITY OF BRlDGEPORT LAND RECORDS MAILED CERTIFIED MAlL,

RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 

### Certified DocumentNo.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 07924

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 07924\07924_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07924\07924_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

07924\07924_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 07924\07924_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07924\07924_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07924\07924_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07924\07924_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 07924\07924_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

07924\Certification Statement_07924.pdf Plant certification statement

07924\Supporting Documentation\07942_Map 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x '07924\Supporting Documentation\07924_WW Diagram (CBI).pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of instaCare Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Keith Berman  Keith Berman  Principal Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer  November 14, 2008
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-24047, Form S-8 No. 333-57799, Form S-8 No.333-44416 and Form S-8 No. 333-99511) pertaining to the Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, and (Form S-8 No. 333-103318) pertaining to outstanding nonqualified stock options issued to nonemployeedirectors, of our report dated June 3, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 26, 2004. 

 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Los Angeles, California 

June 8, 2004
----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2008      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                      |                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | APPLETON      PAPERS INC. |
|                                   |                      |                                                                 |
| Dated:      August  11, 2008 |                      |        /s/ Thomas J. Ferree                                     |
|                                   | Name:                     | Thomas      J. Ferree                                                |
|                                   | Title:                    | Vice      President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |

----

----
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 563

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat recycling facilities

as exempt facilities under the tax-exempt bond rules, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 15, 1995

Mr. GREGG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat recycling facilities as exempt facilities under the tax-exempt

bond rules, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Environmental Infra5 structure Financing Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. RECYCLING FACILITIES TREATED AS EXEMPT

7 FACILITIES.

8 (a) TREATMENT AS EXEMPT FACILITY BOND.—Sub9 section (a) of section 142 of the Internal Revenue Code

10 of 1986 (defining exempt facility bond) is amended by
2

•S 563 IS

1 striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph (11), by striking

2 the period at the end of paragraph (12) and inserting ‘‘,

3 or’’, and by adding at the end the following new para4 graph:

5 ‘‘(13) qualified recycling facilities.’’

6 (b) QUALIFIED RECYCLING FACILITIES DEFINED.—

7 Section 142 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defin8 ing exempt facility bond) is amended by adding at the end

9 the following new subsection:

10 ‘‘(k) QUALIFIED RECYCLING FACILITIES.—

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of subsection

12 (a)(13), the term ‘qualified recycling facilities’

13 means any facility used exclusively—

14 ‘‘(A) to sort and prepare municipal, indus15 trial, and commercial refuse for recycling, or

16 ‘‘(B) in the recycling of qualified refuse.

17 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED REFUSE.—For purposes of

18 this subsection, the term ‘qualified refuse’ means—

19 ‘‘(A) yard waste,

20 ‘‘(B) food waste,

21 ‘‘(C) waste paper and paperboard,

22 ‘‘(D) plastic scrap,

23 ‘‘(E) rubber scrap,

24 ‘‘(F) ferrous and nonferrous scrap metal,

25 ‘‘(G) waste glass,
3

•S 563 IS

1 ‘‘(H) construction and demolition waste,

2 and

3 ‘‘(I) biosolids (sewage sludge).

4 ‘‘(3) RECYCLING.—For purposes of this sub5 section, the term ‘recycling’ includes either—

6 ‘‘(A) processing (including composting)

7 qualified refuse to a point at which such refuse

8 has commercial value; or

9 ‘‘(B) manufacturing products from quali10 fied refuse when such refuse constitutes at least

11 40 percent, by weight or volume, of the total

12 materials introduced into the manufacturing

13 process.

14 ‘‘(4) SPECIAL RULE.—Refuse shall not fail to

15 be treated as waste merely because such refuse has

16 a market value at the place such refuse is located

17 only by reason of the value of such refuse for recy18 cling.’’

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

20 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of

21 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds
knowledge:



| | 1) |  | the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) |  | the information contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Paul Walker



Paul Walker

President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: May 14, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7628** 

JAMES MATTHEWS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. LEVERN COHEN, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 4:14

- cv - 04538

- MGL )

Submitted : February 2 5 , 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS , Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. James Matthew, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, James Anthony Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Matthews seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge is sues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies r elief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Matthews has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with o ral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
S. 531

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To authorize a circuit judge who has taken part in an in banc hearing of a

case to continue to participate in that case after taking senior status, and for

other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

The last sentence of section 46(c) of title 28, United States

Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘eligible’’ and by inserting

before the period at the end of the sentence ‘‘, or (2) to continue

to participate in the decision of a case or controversy that was

heard or reheard by the court in banc at a time when such judge

was in regular active service’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                         -----------------------------

The Board of Directors
MeriStar Hospitality Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-60463) on Form S-8 (MeriStar Hospitality Corporation Incentive Plan), the
registration statement (No. 333-60465) on Form S-8 (MeriStar Hospitality
Corporation Non-employee Director's Incentive Plan), the registration statement
(No. 333-66229) on Form S-3, and the registration statement (No. 333-37888) on
Form S-8 (MeriStar Hospitality Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan) of our
report dated January 28, 2002, with respect to  the consolidated balance sheets
of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and
2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholder's
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001, and the related financial statement schedule, which report
appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K/A of MeriStar
Hospitality Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP


Washington, D.C.
March 27, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                              BAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



The following are subsidiaries of Bar Technologies Inc. as of January 2, 1999:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     STATE OR OTHER
                                                     JURISDICTION OF             PERCENT
NAME                                                 INCORPORATION              OWNERSHIP
----                                                 -------------              ---------
<S>                                                  <C>                        <C>
Bliss & Laughlin Industries Inc.                     Delaware                      100%

Canadian Drawn Steel Company*                        Canada                        100%
</TABLE>



* Canadian Drawn Steel Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bliss & Laughlin 
  Industries Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 23 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                         Calendar No. 2
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 23

   To protect the First Amendment rights of employees of the Federal 
                              Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

 Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                            January 5, 1995

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To protect the First Amendment rights of employees of the Federal 
                              Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    Section. 1. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no employee 
of the Federal Government shall be peremptorily removed without public 
hearings from his or her position because of remarks made during 
personal time in opposition to the Federal Government's policies, or 
proposed policies regarding homosexuals, and any such individual so 
removed prior to date of enactment of this Act shall be reinstated to 
his or her previous position.

                                                         Calendar No. 2

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 23

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To protect the First Amendment rights of employees of the Federal 
                              Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 5, 1995

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
II

Calendar No. 99

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 549

[Report No. 104–76]

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the

construction of three hydroelectric projects in the State of Arkansas.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 14 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. BUMPERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

APRIL 27 (legislative day, APRIL 24), 1995

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power Act applicable to the construction of three hydroelectric projects

in the State of Arkansas.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

4 Notwithstanding the time limitations of section 13 of

5 the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), the Federal En6 ergy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the li-
2

S 549 RS

1 censee for FERC projects numbered 4204, 4660, and

2 4659 (and after reasonable notice), is authorized, in ac3 cordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public in4 terest requirements of section 13 and the Commission’s

5 procedures under such section, to extend the time required

6 for commencement of construction of the projects for a

7 maximum of three consecutive two-year periods. This sec8 tion shall take effect for the project upon the expiration

9 of the extension (issued by the Commission under section

10 13) of the period required for commencement of such

11 project.

Calendar No. 99

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 549

[Report No. 104–76]

A BILL

To extend the deadline under the Federal Power

electric projects in the State of Arkansas.Act applicable to the construction of three hydroAPRIL 27 (legislative day, APRIL 24), 1995

Reported without amendment
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

JON ANTHONY SCHWEDER, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 22-0054 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Navajo County

No. S0900CR20090633

The Honorable Melinda K. Hardy, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Navajo County Attorney’s Office, Holbrook

By Michael R. Shumway

Counsel for Respondent

Jon Anthony Schweder, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 5-3-2022
STATE v. SCHWEDER

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz, Judge Samuel A. Thumma, and Judge 

Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Jon Anthony Schweder seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge:



1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 29, 2013 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Lawrence H. Silber                        | 
| | --------------------------------------------- | 
| | Lawrence H. Silber                            | 
| | Interim President and Chief Executive Officer | 



Date: November 13, 2013



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.