alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 533 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 32
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 533

 To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal court, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 10 (legislative day, March 6), 1995

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                             March 16, 1995

                Reported by Mr. Hatch, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal court, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL.

    The first sentence of section 1447(c) of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``any defect in removal procedure'' and 
inserting ``any defect other than lack of subject matter 
jurisdiction''.
                                                        Calendar No. 32

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 533

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To clarify the rules governing removal of cases to Federal court, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 16, 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander O’Brian WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander O’Brian Williams, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 01-4812, 02-4204.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 8, 2002.

Decided Sept. 3, 2002.

Sofíe W. Hosford, Hosford & Hosford, P.L.L.C., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Steven H. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER *CURIAM.*

Alexander O’Brian Williams pled guilty pursuant to a written plea agreement to two counts of distribution of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) (2000). Williams was sentenced to 223 months imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently. In these consolidated appeals, Williams challenges the district court’s denial of his motions to withdraw his guilty plea and to appoint an expert voice identification witness. Williams has also filed a supplemental pro se brief in which he claims that his due process rights were violated. We affirm.

*716We review the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea for abuse of discretion. *United States v. Ubakanma,*215 F.3d 421, 424 (4th Cir.2000). Williams must present a “fair and just” reason for withdrawing his guilty plea. Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(e); *United States v. Moore,*931 F.2d 245, 248 (4th Cir.1991). Based on the factors set forth in *Moore,*we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

Next, Williams challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to appoint a voice identification expert to examine the tape recording of the transaction underlying count 2 of the indictment. To show reversible error in a district court’s refusal to appoint an expert pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(e) (2000), Williams must demonstrate that the court’s refusal was prejudicial to his defense. *United States v. Perrera,*842 F.2d 73, 77 (4th Cir.1988). In light of his valid guilty plea, we find that Williams cannot establish that the denial of his motion was prejudicial to his defense.

Finally, Williams alleges that referral of his case for federal rather than state prosecution violated his due process rights. This claim, however, is meritless. *United States v. Carter,*953 F.2d 1449, 1461-62 (5th Cir.1992).

Accordingly, we grant Williams’ motion to file a supplemental pro se brief and affirm his conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Public Media Works, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ed Roffman certify in my capacity as Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed as of July 15, 2011.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ed Roffman                                                  
|Ed Roffman Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000984 31-JAN-2014 08:37 AM
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

PUBLICMEDIA WORKS, INC.

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Public Media Works, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending August 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shaun D. C. Edwardes,Executive Vice President, Acting Chief Financial Officer and director of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| Date:  October 14,  2004 | /s/ Shaun D.C. Edwardes                                                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    | Shaun D.C. Edwardes                                                     |
|                                    | Executive Vice President,  Acting Chief Financial Officer  and director |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                WITH REGARD TO HEALTHWATCH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


                              TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                            3340 Peachtree Road, N.E.
                                    Suite 250
                                Atlanta, GA 30326

We hereby consent to the use of our report, dated October 11,2001,accompanying
the consolidated financial statements of HealthWatch, Inc. as of June 30, 2001
and 2000, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB and to the
incorporation by reference of the aforementioned financial statements in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 for the 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan,
Employee Stock Purchase Plan of 1987,Stock Option Plan of 1989 and Stock Option
Plan of 1993, Registration Statement Nos. 33-36833, 33-22729, 33-36832 and
33-75470, respectively, Registration Statements on Form S-8 for the 1995 Stock
Option Plan and 1995 Stock Grant and Salary Deferral Plan Registration Statement
Nos. 033- 65151 and 333-35297 and S-3 Registration Statements for Selling
Shareholders Nos. 33-88032, 333-19393, 333-21929 and 333-26913.

/s/ Tauber & Balser, P.C.
----------------------------
TAUBER & BALSER, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia
October 15, 2001
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 23187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-09157]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0492; FRL-9945-34-OAR]
RIN 2060-AR97

Clarification of Requirements for Method 303 Certification 
Training

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received 
adverse comment, we are withdrawing the direct final rule for 
Clarification of Requirements for Method 303 Certification Training, 
published on February 25, 2016.

DATES: Effective April 20, 2016, the EPA withdraws the direct final 
rule published at 81 FR 9350, on February 25, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kim Garnett, U.S. EPA, Office of 
Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, 
Measurement Technology Group (Mail Code: E143-02), Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-1158; fax number: (919) 
541-0516; email address: garnett.kim@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because the EPA received adverse comment, we 
are withdrawing the direct final rule for Clarification of Requirements 
for Method 303 Certification Training, published on February 25, 2016 
(81 FR 9350). We stated in that direct final rule that if we received 
adverse comment by March 28, 2016, the direct final rule would not take 
effect and we would publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal 
Register. We subsequently received adverse comment on that direct final 
rule. We will address those comments in any subsequent final action, 
which will be based on the parallel proposed rule also published on 
February 25, 2016 (81 FR 9407). As stated in the direct final rule and 
the parallel proposed rule, we will not institute a second comment 
period on this action.

    Dated: April 14, 2016.
Janet G. McCabe,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-09157 Filed 4-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<PAGE>


                                             Exhibit 23(b)

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We consent to the incorporation of our report dated January 14, 2000 relating
to the financial statements of the Elgin Riverboat Resort-Riverboat Casino as of
December 31, 1999 and 1998, and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1999 included (or incorporated by reference) into the filing on
Form 10-K/A on or about March 29, 2000, of Mandalay Resort Group (the "Company")
for the year ended January 31, 1999, into the Company's previously filed Form
S-8 Registration Statements File Nos. 2-91950, 2-93578, 33-18278, 33-29014,
33-39215, 33-56420, 33-53303 and 333-51073 and into the Company's previously
filed Form S-3 Registration Statement File No. 333-60975.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


March 27, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 CKE RESTAURANTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in thousands)
 Fiscal years ended January 31,2008
    
    2007
    
    2006
    
    2005
    
    2004Earnings before fixed charges:Income (loss) before income taxes
and discontinued operations
    
    $
    59,731
    
    
    $
    88,213
    
    
    $
    59,747
    
    
    $
    23,633
    
    
    $
    (11,205
    )Fixed charges
    
    
    63,809
    
    
    
    49,447
    
    
    
    52,650
    
    
    
    68,765
    
    
    
    69,945$
    123,540
    
    
    $
    137,660
    
    
    $
    112,397
    
    
    $
    92,398
    
    
    $
    58,740Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    33,033
    
    
    $
    19,768
    
    
    $
    22,988
    
    
    $
    36,775
    
    
    $
    40,043Interest component of rent expense
    
    
    30,776
    
    
    
    29,679
    
    
    
    29,662
    
    
    
    31,990
    
    
    
    29,902$
    63,809
    
    
    $
    49,447
    
    
    $
    52,650
    
    
    $
    68,765
    
    
    $
    69,945Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.9
    
    
    
    2.8
    
    
    
    2.1
    
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    Deficiency (if any)
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (11,205
    )Rent expense
    
    
    92,329
    
    
    
    89,038
    
    
    
    88,985
    
    
    
    95,971
    
    
    
    89,707Interest component (1/3 of rent expense)
    
    
    30,776
    
    
    
    29,679
    
    
    
    29,662
    
    
    
    31,990
    
    
    
    29,902
SUBSIDIARIES OF
EXECUTONE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                           JURISDICATION OF     %
NAME                          INCORPORATION    OWNERSHIP   BUSINESS

<S>                                <C>           <C>      <C>
Unistar Gaming Corporation       Delware        100%     478 Wheelers Farms Rd
Holding                                                  Milford, CT  06460

Unistar Entertainment, Inc.      Idaho          100%     478 Wheelers Farms Rd
Management                                               Milford, CT  06460

All listed subsidiaries do business only under their corporte names listed
above.  Certain inactive and immaterial subsidiaries, which if considered
in the aggregate as a single subsidiary would not constitute a "significant
subsidiary" as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of the Commission as of December 31,
1997, are not listed.





</TABLE>
Nome, Alaska, Wind Turbine Demonstration Project 

Finding of No Significant Impact 
Nome, Alaska, Wind Turbine Demonstration Project 

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT 

SUMMARY 

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment 

(EA) to provide DOE and other public agency decision makers witb tbe 

environmental documentation required to take informed discretionary action on the 

proposed Nome, Alaska, Wind Turbine Demonstration Project (DOE/EA-1280). The 

EA assesses the potential environmental impacts and cumulative impacts that would 

result from the jnstallation and operation of wind turbines in Nome, Alaska DOE'S 

role in the proposed action would be limited to providing ,$ding assistance for a 

portion of the construction and demonstration of wind energy technology in the 

challenging arctic environment. Although DOE would review project activities, DOE 

would have no responsibilities for construction supervision or facility operations. 

Further, DOE would have no responsibilities for the day-today management of the 

facility once it becomes operational. The Nome Joint Utility System would have sole 

responsibility for construction md operations. 

Based on the information in the EA, whch analyzes the relevant environmental 

issues, DOE finds that no significant impact would result from implementing the 

proposed action to build and operate up to two wind turbines on Anvil Mountain, 

Nome, Alaska. The proposed action does not constitute a major Federal action 

significantly affecting the quality of the human or physical environment within the 

meaning ofthe National Environmental Policy Act, therefore, implementation of the 

proposed action does not require the preparation of an environmental impact 

statement. 

Issued in Golden, Colorado, this 8' day of November, 2000. 

/' 

- 

Frank M. Stewart, Manager 

U. S. Department of Energy, Golden Field Office
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 336 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 336

                    For the relief of John T. Monk.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 2 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of John T. Monk.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF.

    (a) Termination of Premium Payments.--(1) Notwithstanding any 
provision of subchapter I of chapter 19 of title 38, United States 
Code, John T. Monk of Jackson, Mississippi, may not be required to make 
premium payments after the date of the enactment of this Act for the 
National Service Life Insurance insurance policy for which such 
individual was making monthly premium payments before such date.
    (2) The termination of the requirement for premium payments under 
paragraph (1) shall not terminate or otherwise affect the coverage of 
John T. Monk of Jackson, Mississippi, under the insurance policy 
referred to in such paragraph.
    (b) Refund.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs, shall pay to John T. Monk of Jackson, Mississippi, 
out of any sums in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the amount 
equal to the excess of--
            (1) the aggregate amount of the monthly premium payments 
        made by John T. Monk of Jackson, Mississippi, for the National 
        Service Life Insurance insurance policy referred to in 
        subsection (a)(1), over
            (2) the amount of the insurance provided for under that 
        insurance policy.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                             450
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,746
<PP&E>                                          15,184
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  89,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            90
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    89,785
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               451,344
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  344,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,438
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,177
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,271
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,906
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,906
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Donald J. Zuk      
|                      |  | Donald J. Zuk          
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.