alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30540-30541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12269]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New Hampshire Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a briefing meeting of 
the New Hampshire Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
9:30 a.m. (EST) on Wednesday, June 18, 2014, in Room 303 of the 
Legislative Office Building located at 33 N. State Street, Concord, NH 
03301. The purpose of the briefing meeting is to hear from government 
officials, advocates, citizens, and others on the issue of human 
trafficking in New Hampshire.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Friday, July 18, 
2014. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to Melanie 
Reingardt at ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information 
may contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of 
the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email, or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

[[Page 30541]]

    Dated: May 22, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-12269 Filed 5-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's (NSB) Committee on Science and Engineering Policy (SEP) hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a videoconference for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE:

Monday, February 5, 2024, from 1:00 p.m.-2:00 p.m. Eastern.

# PLACE:

                        The meeting will be held by videoconference through the National Science Foundation. Members of the public can observe this meeting through a YouTube livestream. The YouTube                               ( print page 6557)                            link will be available from the NSB meetings web page—                        *https://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​meetings/​index.jsp.*

# STATUS:

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        Chair's opening remarks; Discussion of draft proposal for                         *S&E Indicators 2026*                         suite of products; Discussion of potential NSB STEM talent policy messages.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Point of contact for this meeting is Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov*, 703/292-7000.                    

Christopher Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2024-02022 Filed 1-29-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




We have issued our report dated February 9, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedules incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report of Xybernaut Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statements of the Company on Forms S-3 (File No.
333-68859, effective January 25, 1999, File No. 333-33940, effective April 25,
2000, File No. 333-40996, effective August 4, 2000, and File No. 333-51974,
effective January 12, 2001) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-94463, effective
January 12, 2000).

/s/ Grant Thornton, LLP

Vienna, Virginia
February 9, 2001
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00555-CR

David Espinoza

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 22FC-0047F(S1)

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 25, 2024
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.



### ----------------------------------- * Application of 

### * PentastarAviation Charter Inc. *DOT Docket: DOT-OST-2014-0004 for authorityto conduct scheduled passenger operations as a commuter air carrier under49 U.S.C. 41738 

### * 

### *

----- *

MOTION OF PentastarAviation Charter, Inc TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE

Communications with respecttothis documentshould be sentto:

December 17.,2013 JE Murdock Ill 5034 Nebraska Ave.,NW Washington, DC 20008 202-333-5986 Sandy_murdock@yahoo.com

Notice: Any person who wishes to support or oppose this application mustfile an answer by [7 days after receipt ofthe application bythe DepartmentofTransportation] and serve that answer on all persons served with thisfiling.Application of BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.



### ----------- * * PentastarAviation Charter Inc. *DOT Docket: DOT-OST-2014-0004 for authorityto conduct scheduled passenger operations as a CommuterAir Carrier under49 U.S.C. 41738 

### * *

--------------- *

MOTION OF PENTASTAR AVIATION CHARTER INC TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE Pursuant to section 

### 302.12 ofthe Department's Rules of Practice, PENTASTAR AVIATION CHARTER INC (PACt) hereby moves to withhold from public-ATTACHMENT K page 20, which shows the income statementfor thefirsttwo quarters of 2013.These documents are being filed with this Motion in a sealed envelope marked "Confidential Materials - Rule 

### 12 Treatment Requested." In support ofthis Motion, PACt submits the following:
The lasttwo quarters of results are extraordinarily sensitive commercial, financial data which PACt's competitors could use to bid against the applicant for other public charters and/or possible scheduled service markets. Disclosure would harm PACI's ability to compete effectively and create an undue advantagethrough this application process. Moreover, the information in this exhibit is highly detailed and would not otherwise be made accessible to persons outside the company. Therefore, this information should be afforded confidential treatment by the Department under Rule 

### 12. Submitted by, JE Murdock Ill Outside Counsel for PACI Attachments
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Macreport.net, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, V.
William Lucchetti, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
----------------------------------
     V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
     Chief Executive Officer


July 15, 2003
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT





GT Bicycles California, Inc.
GT BMX Products, Inc.
Riteway Distributors, Inc.
Riteway Distributors Central, Inc.
Riteway Products East, Inc.
Riteway Products North Central, Inc.
Riteway Products Japan K.K.
Riteway Products France S.A.R.L.
Caratti Sport Limited
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
American General Hospitality Corporation on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-33007 and
333-36127) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-08845, 333-08841 and 333-45329) as
amended of our report dated January 26, 1998, except for Note 11, as to which
the date is March 16, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of American General Hospitality
Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the year ended December
31, 1997 and the period from July 31, 1996 (inception of operations) through
December 31, 1996, and our report dated January 30, 1998, except for Note 6, as
to which the date is March 16, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of AGH Leasing, L.P. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the
year ended December 31, 1997 and the period from July 31, 1996 (inception of
operations) through December 31, 1996, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A.     

    
                                       /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.     


Dallas, Texas
    
June 5, 1998
#### Walter BAKER, Appellant, v. CITY OF LEXINGTON et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 21, 1958.

James R. Richardson, Darrell B. Hancock, Lexington, for appellant.

Rufus Lisle, Foster Ockerman, John R. Cook, Jr., Lexington, for appellees.

CLAY, Commissioner.

Plaintiff appellant sought recovery against appellee City of Lexington for personal injuries sustained when he tripped on a strand of wire across a pathway in a city park. The trial court gave summary judgment for the city.

On this appeal plaintiff admits that we have consistently held the maintenance of parks is a governmental function, and cities are immune from liability for negli*556gence with respect thereto. See City of Louisville v. Pirtle, 297 Ky. 553, 180 S.W.2d 303. It is argued by plaintiff that this doctrine of municipal immunity is unsound, and upon reconsideration of the problem, we should abandon it. Since the filing of the briefs in this action, we have twice had occasion to carefully reconsider the rule, and though criticizing it, have declined to change it. Smith v. City of Lexington, Ky., 307 S.W.2d 568; V. T. C. Lines, Inc. v. City of Harlan, Ky., - S.W.2d -. These two cases dispose of plaintiff’s first contention.

It is next urged that the maintenance of the wire over which plaintiff stumbled constituted a nuisance, and the doctrine of municipal immunity should not apply. This is simply an attempt to circumvent the doctrine by giving the negligent act another name. Even if the condition arose to the dignity of a nuisance, which we seriously doubt, the basis of plaintiff’s claim is still the negligence of the city. This ground for reversal is without merit.

Finally plaintiff contends that the city may not claim immunity because he was injured while departing from the Park’s auditorium where he had gone to transact business. The auditorium is leased by the city for private pecuniary profit, and it is claimed that the city had abandoned the governmental function with respect to its operation. This question might be properly presented if the plaintiff had been injured in the auditorium. However, he had departed from the auditorium premises, and his claim stands on the same footing as any other member of the general public.

We believe the trial court properly adjudicated the issues in granting summary judgment for the city.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0738

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

AMBER MARIE BURNETT,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Robert G. Olson, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 1 2021

12/01/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0738
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28,
2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pierre Nanterme, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture plc, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 25, 2011

/s/ Pierre NantermePierre NantermeChief Executive Officer of Accenture plc, general partner of Accenture SCA (principal executive officer)
#### Ex parte Robert G. BARSTOW.

No. 31504.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1960.

Robert G. Barstow, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Samuel H. Robertson, Jr., Jack J. Rawitscher, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant, here, relator in the court below, was charged by complaint in the corporation court of the city of Hunters Creek, in Harris County, with a violation of the traffic laws of that city.

Upon trial, appellant was convicted and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.

Appellant was arrested by virtue of a capias issued on that judgment. He did not appeal to the county court.

Appellant applied for and was granted the writ of habeas corpus by the judge of the County Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County, by which writ he sought his dis-chargé from custody.

After hearing, the relief prayed for was denied. It is from that order that this appeal followed.

*938Appellant correctly recognizes that this court is limited to a determination as to whether the judgment and the capias issued thereunder is void, as distinguished from voidable.

It is claimed that the judgment of conviction is void because no formal judgment of conviction was entered, in compliance with the provisions of Art. 783, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The record shows that the only judgment entered was a docket entry, which reads as lollows:

> '“.Docket No. 1639, State of Texas versus Robert Gordon Barstow, offense, speeding, 50 miles an hour in a 40 mile zone, arresting officer, J. M. Schultea, trial date, July 6, 1959, judgment, found guilty, fined $25.00.”

The conclusion is reached that the case of Ex parte Leachman, 150 Tex.Cr.R. 145, 199 S.W.2d 661, is direct authority supporting appellant’s contention, here, that the judgment against him and upon which the capias issued is void. In that case the only judgment entered by the corporation court was as follows:

> “ ‘This day came on to be heard for hearing this cause: the defendant *plead*guilty and was fined one hundred dollars.’ ”

That entry was signed “ ‘Frank C. O’Brien,’ ” who was the judge of the corporation court.

The similarity between the two judgments is apparent.

In holding the judgment in the Leach-man case void, this court said:

> “It will be observed that the purported judgment here involved does not comply with either the requisites of a judgment in the county court or justice court in that the defendant was not committed to jail, nor to an officer •until the fine and costs were paid,' nor did it direct that the city recover of the defendant the fine and costs, and that he remain *in custody oí*an officer until the fine and costs were paid.”

The contention that the judgment was no judgment at all was sustained and Leachman was discharged.

Since appellant’s arrest is predicated upon a void judgment, he is entitled to be discharged from custody. It is so ordered.
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                           |                          |   |
| Dated:  May 12, 2011 |                          |   /s/ Mark R. Richards |
|                           | Name:                         | Mark R. Richards |
|                           | Title:                        | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                      FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                   Bank of America, National Association (USA)


                    BANK OF AMERICA MASTER CREDIT CARD TRUST
                    ----------------------------------------


The  undersigned,  a duly authorized representative of Bank of America, National
Association  (USA)  ("Bank of America"), as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing  Agreement  dated  as  of  JULY  19,  1996 (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement")  by  and between Bank of America and U.S. Bank National Association,
as  trustee  does  hereby  certify  that:

                Bank  of  America  is  Servicer  under the Pooling and Servicing
                Agreement.

                The  undersigned  is duly authorized pursuant to the Pooling and
                Servicing  Agreement  to  execute  and  deliver this Certificate
                to the Trustee.

                This  Certificate  is  delivered pursuant to Section 3.05 of the
                Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement.

                A  review  of  the  Activities of the Servicer during the period
                from  the  Closing  date  until  December  31,  2000  was
                conducted  under  the supervision  of  the  undersigned.

                Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best knowledge of
                the  undersigned,  fully  performed  all  its  obligations under
                the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement throughout such period and
                no default in the performance of such  obligations has occurred
                or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 6  below.

                The  following  is  a  description  of  each  default  in  the
                performance  of the  Servicer's obligations under the provisions
                of  the  Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement,  including  any
                Supplement,  known to the undersigned to have  been made during
                such period  which sets forth in detail: (i) the nature of each
                such default; (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to
                remedy each  such  default;  (iii)  the  current status of each
                such default:
                                  None


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate this 30th
day of  March,  2001.



                              By:  /s/  David  M.  Belk
                                 ----------------------
                              Name:   David  M.  Belk
                              Title:  Senior  Vice  President
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 4,      2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |                      |                                                                 |
|------------------------------|---------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | APPLETON      PAPERS INC. |
|                         |                      |                                                                 |
| Dated:      November 6, 2009 |                      |                                                                 |
|                         | Name:                     | Thomas      J. Ferree                                                |
|                         | Title:                    | Vice      President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer |