alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






Exhibit (4)(D)(1)
TEACHERS INSURANCE AND ANNUITY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA
730 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
Telephone: [800-842-2733]


Retirement Choice Plus Non-ERISA Annuity Contract




RETIREMENT CHOICE PLUS NON-ERISA
ANNUITY CONTRACT NO.:  [xxxxxxxx]
CONTRACTHOLDER:  [National Academy of Sciences]
DATE OF ISSUE:  [January 1, 2013]




This contract ("the Contract") was made and delivered in [the State of state], and is subject to the laws and regulations thereof. 


This contract is issued in consideration of the payment of premiums by the Contractholder to Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America ("TIAA"). 


The Contract may be amended by TIAA without the consent of any other person, provided that such change does not reduce the then current accumulation of any Annuitant, or any benefit purchased under the Contract up to that time. TIAA may stop accepting premiums under the Contract at any time.


The provisions contained on the following pages (the Certificate) are part of the Contract.




   
      Senior Vice President and                                             President and
            Corporate Secretary                                         Chief Executive Officer








IGRSPNE-MC
**EXHIBIT 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

ICT Group, Inc.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-32623, 333-56187, 333-55702, 333-97357 and 333-111531) of ICT Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofICT Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K ofICT Group, Inc. 

Our report dated March 14, 2008 on the consolidated financial statements refers to the adoption ofthe provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting forUncertainty in Income Taxes*, effective January 1, 2007*,*and the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment,*effective January 1, 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 14, 2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of our report dated September 19, 1996 (October 25, 1996 as to Note
12), appearing in the Form 10-K of Data Processing Resources Corporation for
year ended July 31, 1996.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Costa Mesa, California
January 29, 1997
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report), by Xybernaut Corporation (the
Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that,
to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2. The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

March 12, 2004

| |     |                     
| | --- | --------------------
| | By: | /s/ EDWARD G. NEWMAN

| |                                   
| | ----------------------------------
| |                                   
| | Edward G. Newman                  
| | Chief Executive Officer and       
| | Chairman of the Board of Directors

March 12, 2004

| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ THOMAS D. DAVIS

| |                          
| | -------------------------
| |                          
| | Thomas D. Davis          
| | Senior Vice President and
| | Chief Financial Officer  

March 12, 2004

| |     |                     
| | --- | --------------------
| | By: | /s/ STEVEN A. NEWMAN

| |                                        
| | ---------------------------------------
| |                                        
| | Steven A. Newman                       
| | President, Chief Operating Officer and 
| | Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | A signed original of this written statement
    required by Section 906 has been provided to Xybernaut
    Corporation and will be retained by Xybernaut Corporation, and
    furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
    upon request.
Exhibit
4.7


 


 


 





March
10, 2017


 


Securities
and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington,
D.C. 20549


 


Re:
SB Financial Group, Inc. — Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


SB
Financial Group, Inc., an Ohio corporation ("SB Financial"), is today filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "SEC") the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SB Financial for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 ("SB Financial's
2016 Form 10-K").


 


Pursuant
to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, SB Financial hereby agrees to furnish to
the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of long-term debt and of the long-term
debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to SB Financial's 2016 Form 10-K. None of such long-term
debt exceeds 10% of the total assets of SB Financial and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


 


Very
truly yours,


 


SB
FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


 


/s/ Anthony V. Cosentino


 


Anthony
V. Cosentino


Executive
Vice President and


 





	 	401
    Clinton Street   |   Defiance, OH 43512
	 	P
    419.783.8950  |    F 419.782.6393
	 	YourSBFinancial.corn
**Exhibit 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert L. Howard-Anderson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.

|  
By:

/s/ ROBERT L. HOWARD-ANDERSON

 
 
 
 
 
Name:

**Robert L. Howard-Anderson**

 
 
Title:

**President and Chief Executive Officer**

 
I, Howard M. Bailey, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Occam Networks, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Occam Networks, Inc.  

 
By:

/s/ HOWARD M. BAILEY

 
 
 
 
 
Name:

**Howard M. Bailey**

 
 
Title:

**Chief Financial Officer**

 
  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Ollie Hagins WHITE et al. v. Ester J. STEELE’S ADMINISTRATOR (Grannis Bach), et al.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Feb. 17, 1956.

Carl F. Eversole, Richmond, for appellants.

Grannis Bach,.Jackson, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This action was instituted by the appellants against Grannis Bach, as administrator of the estate of Ester J. Steele, and his bondsmen, to recover some $900 for the alleged mishandling of the estate of Ester J. Steele by Grannis Bach.

We have examined the record fully and have reached the conclusion that the judgment of the trial court was proper. :

Wherefore, the motion for. an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
#### Francisco GARCIA, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 30306.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 14, 1959.

*728Thompson & Hight, Fort Worth, for ■ appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder without malice; the punishment, five years.

In view of our disposition of this case, it is unnecessary to set out the facts other than to observe that the appellant testified he shot in self defense, and made application for a suspended sentence.

On cross-examination, the appellant was asked, “Have you ever been arrested for unlawfully carrying a pistol?” and was required to answer that he had been “somewhere around 1950.” It was established for the purpose of the bill, in the absence of the jury, that at the time the prosecutor asked the question he knew the prosecution against the appellant for carrying the pistol had been dismissed.

Recently, in Dempsey v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 602, 266 S.W.2d 875, 876, we had before us a comparable situation and, in reversing the conviction, said:

> “Appellant filed an application for a suspended sentence and testified as a witness in his own behalf. His reputation was therefore put in issue. Under well-established rules of evidence the state was entitled to show that his general reputation as a peaceable and law-abiding citizen was bad, and also to prove recent convictions for felony offenses or offenses involving moral turpitude, if such proof was available.

> “But collateral acts of misconduct not resulting in charges filed (and under the present statute, Art. 732a, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., in conviction), or convictions for misdemeanors not involving moral turpitude are not generally admissible. Pena v. State, [157] Tex.Cr.R. 63, 246 S.W.2d 478; Mitchell v. State, [156] Tex.Cr.R. 128, 239 S.W.2d 384; Clements v. State, 145 Tex.Cr.R. 428, 169 S.W.2d 190.

> “The state offered no proof of the bad general reputation of appellant. But on his cross-examination, appellant having admitted that he had the knife in his pocket, the state was permitted to show that after he had had ‘previous knifing trouble’ the sheriff ordered appellant not to carry a knife and he promised he would not.”

See also Davis v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 138, 268 S.W.2d 152; Rodriquez v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 453, 272 S.W.2d 366; and Parrish v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 252, 290 S.W.2d 245.

For the error pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Meeting with OEMs 01/28/11

Attendees:

- Drusilla Hufford, EPA/SPD

- Yaidi Cancel, EPA/SPD

- Ward Atkinson, SAE/ICCSC chair

- William Hill, SAE/GM retiree

- Harry Eustice, GM

- Curt Vincent, GM

- Juergen Wertenbach, Daimler

- Hans Hammer, Audi

On Friday, January 28, representatives from General Motors (GM), Audi and Daimler AG met 

with SPD’s Drusilla Hufford and Yaidi Cancel. OEMs discussed the past transition from CFC-12 to 

non-ODS MVAC alternatives (e.g., HFC-134a) and issues to be considered with the expected 

global transition to low-GWP alternatives. This included questions about the timing for SNAP 

final rules, market availability and continued needs for legacy vehicle servicing. GM noted the 

important environmental benefits for transition and their intention to manufacture some 2013 

model vehicles using HFO-1234yf. European OEMs announced that some of their 2012 fleet will 

use HFO-1234yf.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 22, 2017

s0315

Order 

Clerk

March 22, 2017

153912 & (53)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153912

COA: 325857

Berrien CC: 2014-003481-FC

JORDAN CONRAD JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file pro per supplemental 

application is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 19, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.35

                 Amended Schedule of Meditrust Facility Leases
Which are Substantially Similar to the Facility Lease Attached as Exhibit 10.34

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                                                              ORIGINAL
                                                                               LEASING       MEDITRUST                  NO. OF UNITS
 FACILITY NAME                               LOCATION                   COMMITMENT FEE      INVESTMENT      BASE RENT   IN FACILITY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>                         <C>                <C>             <C>          <C>

Alterra Sterling House of Davison            Davison, Michigan                   NONE       $ 1,425,648.0   $  124,174.0        19

Alterra Sterling House of Kenosha            Kenosha, Wisconsin                  NONE       $ 1,399,524.0   $  121,899.0        19

Alterra Clare Bridge of Delta and Alterra
Sterling House of Delta                      Lansing, Michigan                $    6,180.0  $ 5,618,049.0   $  495,512.0    38; 19

Alterra Clare Bridge of Grand Blanc and
Alterra Wynwood of Grand Blanc               Grand Blanc Township, Michigan   $   31,867.0  $13,186,688.0   $1,103,726.0    46; 66

Alterra Clare Bridge of Troy and Alterra
Wynwood of Troy                              Troy, Michigan                   $   33,891.0  $13,389,148.0   $1,120,672.0    46; 66
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,070,089
<SECURITIES>                                12,563,622
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,876
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,342,996
<PP&E>                                          56,187
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,150
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,255,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,131,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,672
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,116,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,255,031
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,608,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,876
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (833,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (833,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (833,488)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 257 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 257

 To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars to make eligible 
 for membership those veterans that have served within the territorial 
                         limits of South Korea.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 20 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

   Mr. Dole (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Thurmond, Mr. Warner, Mr. 
McCain, and Mr. Campbell) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars to make eligible 
 for membership those veterans that have served within the territorial 
                         limits of South Korea.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5 of the 
Act of May 28, 1936 (36 U.S.C. 115), is amended to read as follows:
    ``Sec. 5. A person may not be a member of the corporation created 
by this Act unless that person--
            ``(1) served honorably as a member of the Armed Forces of 
        the United States in a foreign war, insurrection, or 
        expedition, which service has been recognized as campaign-medal 
        service and is governed by the authorization of the award of a 
        campaign badge by the Government of the United States; or
            ``(2) while a member of the Armed Forces of the United 
        States, served honorably on the Korean peninsula or in its 
        territorial waters for not less than 30 consecutive days, or a 
        total of 60 days, after June 30, 1949.''
                                 <all>
```
-~", .

-<~ • 

# . ,:~~ - ~\\,-- ::"'~l, 

## "., r 

## ."'~". ,-' .. -



# _ :7'~11i~1462jie~~~:~,~:4-'~.~



# ..r----.

"j;[. ".~·~·,'l· -.~.

"" 

### "- -,-,"

## . .; -,.- 

# • .~~~---------- ---- ------- .---1--" - ----- . _... _.... --_._._. 

# Am.eriean Airlines®

- ~ • =<-

••• 

### MAIRTENANCE & 

### ENGINEERING Finally, American Airlines has 

### not accepted delivery 

### orany additional Boeing 737 aiicrn:ft since tlie release of AD 

### 2Qo3..()j..()I or Boeing Alert Service 

### suhetin 737- 11AI462 Revision 3. Base~lon-the-robustness of American Airlines cwrent maintenance 

### practi~ l,Uid-previo:us

AD·a.ceomplisfunent, AA is.~ng that all operators Whohive ShOWIl.'due

### diljg#.l~ in'1!~g,<iJi 

### ~ivc course of 

### action in addresSing allaspects o£-6bein-g 

### A1ert$"eivicl.fB'ri!1f@1-7a,7~11AI462R~vi.si6n

### 3 be exempt 

### from repeating mairitenance action per- the· 

## superseding AD for a maintenance program that is already 

### provafeffuctivc, documentea~ and 

### in place_ Ifyou have any questions, conunents or concerns, please feel free to coolact Dan KoS:Z}':k9WSki,CFM56 Lead Engineer~ at dan.koszykowski@aa.com or by phone at 

### (918) 2924474. Regards. L. N. Vrnna Interim Managing Director Powerplant Engineering



## - 

## ..•.

# -.----------,.---------_. 

# __ ._... 

# _- J~
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 102ND DISTRICT COURT OF BOWIE COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 1st 

day of October, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Larry Paul Hollaway, a/k/a Larry Paul 

Holloway, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-13-00254-CR

Trial Court No. 13-F0143-102

As stated in the Court’s opinion, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 28th day of January, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 272

To limit congressional terms.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Rules and Administration

A BILL

To limit congressional terms.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TERM LIMITS.

4 No person shall be elected to three consecutive terms

5 in the Senate. No person shall be elected to seven consecu6 tive terms in the House of Representatives.

7 SEC. 2. PARTIAL TERMS.

8 Election or appointment to a partial term shall not

9 count against the limitations of section 1.
2

•S 272 IS

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This Act shall apply to elections following the date

3 of enactment of this Act.

Æ