alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants
     As independent public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our reports dated February 16, 1999, included in or incorporated
by reference into Thermo Optek's Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended January 2, 1999, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statements as follows: Registration Statement No. 333-13757 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 333-13759 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
333-13761 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-67869 on Form S-8.


                                                            Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 17, 1999
## THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 102ND DISTRIC T COURT OF BOWIE COU NTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 1st

day of October, A.D. 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Larry Paul Hollaway, a/k/a Larry Paul Holloway, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee No. 06

- 13

- 00254

- CR

Trial Cou rt No. 13

- F0143

- 102

As stated in the Court’s opinion , we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 28th day of January , A.D. 2015

.

DEBRA K. AUTREY , Cle rk
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130744 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130744 

 COA: 257260 

Saginaw CC: 03-023041-FC 

ANTHONY JAMES WATSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0724 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 31, 2006 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report of Spur Ranch, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeremy G. Stobie, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;


and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 22, 2010
By:
/s/  Jeremy G. StobieJeremy G. StobieChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended April 1, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 16, 2007 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2100 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2100

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the extension of certain authority for the Marshal of 
            the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 9(c) of the Act entitled ``An Act relating to the policing 
of the building and grounds of the Supreme Court of the United 
States'', approved August 18, 1949 (40 U.S.C. 13n(c)) is amended in the 
first sentence by striking ``1996'' and inserting ``2000''.

            Passed the Senate September 26, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2100

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the extension of certain authority for the Marshal of 
            the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police.
```
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 130/2006

of 27 October 2006         

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added in point 14 (Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex IX to the Agreement:

Article 2

The texts of Directive 2006/29/EC in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 28 October 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Oda Helen SLETNES            

----

(1)OJ L 333, 30.11.2006, p. 44.

(2)OJ L 70, 9.3.2006, p. 50.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  Medical   Licensing
International  Corp.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Gilles Cloutier, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/S/ GILLES CLOUTIER
-----------------------------------------------
Name:  Gilles Cloutier
Title: Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Date:  August 18, 2003


                                       19

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Boston Communications
Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, E.Y. Snowden, President and Chief Executive Officer,
and Karen A. Walker, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                                                       
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 7, 2006 |  | /s/    E. Y. Snowden                                                                  
|                    | 
|                    |  | E.Y. Snowden President and Chief Executive
Officer                                    
|                    | 
|Date: March 7, 2006 |  | /s/    Karen A. Walker                                                                
|                    | 
|                    |  | Karen A. Walker Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Boston Communications Group, Inc., and will be retained by Boston Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                          40,655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  505,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,610
<INVENTORY>                                    429,053
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               986,909
<PP&E>                                          49,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,228,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,538,588
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,492
<OTHER-SE>                                    (363,906)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,228,174
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  616,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (637,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (637,154)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (637,154)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment to the Quarterly Report of The Macreport.net,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the three month period ended February
29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, V. William Lucchetti, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
------------------------------
     V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
     Chief Executive Officer


April 15, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.2



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



(1)  the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                    |  |  |  |  |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC. 
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                   
|Dated: May 12, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    DALE E.
PARKER
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                      



This certification
accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo Antione KING, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4121.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 9, 2002.

Decided Aug. 26, 2002.

Susan A. Kessler, Blackburn, Conte, Schilling & Click, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Brian D. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Michael J. Elston, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Ricardo Antione King appeals from his conviction following a jury trial of interference with commerce by threats or violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (2000), using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000), possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a crime *689punishable by imprisonment in excess of one year, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g) (2000), and possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(k) (2000). Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

On appeal, King contends the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the pretrial and in-court identifications of John and Sun Jung. A district court’s decision to admit eyewitness testimony, as any evidentiary ruling, is entitled to substantial deference and may only be reversed if the court clearly abused its discretion. *United States v. Murray,*65 F.3d 1161, 1168 (4th Cir.1995). Because we find the identification procedure was not impermissibly suggestive, *see Holdren v. Legursky,*16 F.3d 57, 61 (4th Cir.1994), and the Jungs’ identifications were rehable under the totality of the circumstances, *see Manson v. Brathwaite,*432 U.S. 98, 114, 97 S.Ct. 2243, 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), we find the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the contested testimony.

King next contends the district court gave the jury a coercive *Allen v. United States,*164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896), charge. Because King failed to object at trial, review is for plain error. *See United States v. Olano,*507 U.S. 725, 113 S.Ct. 1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). We find no such error.

Finahy, King challenges the sufficiency of the evidence against him, alleging that without the Jungs’ identification testimony, no reasonable jury could find the Government sustained its burden of proof. Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, we find a reasonable trier of fact could have found the Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. *See Glasser v. United States,*315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942).

Accordingly, we affirm King’s convictions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark R. Richards, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paperweight Development Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2007



|           |  |                                                
|---------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                           
|           |  | Mark R. Richards                               
|           |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-24-00309-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.D.C., a Child

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2024EM500751

Honorable Eric J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

the appeal are taxed against appellant.

SIGNED August 14, 2024.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert O. Carr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

This certification is being providedpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever. 

Date: August 7, 2009