alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit










Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT TO
AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION 2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


This Amendment to the American Tower Corporation 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of the 9th day of March, 2017 by American Tower Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”).


WHEREAS, the American Tower Corporation 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company and subsequently approved by the stockholders of the Company on May 9, 2007; and


WHEREAS, the Board has duly adopted and approved this Amendment at a meeting held on the 9th day of March, 2017.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:
The last sentence of Section 6(i) is hereby amended and restated as follows:
“The foregoing notwithstanding, without further approval of the stockholders of the Company, the Committee shall not authorize the amendment of any outstanding Option or Stock Appreciation Right to reduce the exercise price, no Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be canceled and replaced with an Award exercisable for Common Stock at a lower exercise price and no underwater Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be purchased by the Company for cash.”


All other provisions of the Plan, as amended by the foregoing, shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the execution and delivery of this Amendment.
[Signature Page Follows]











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Plan has been executed as of the day and year first above written.
 
	
			
	 
	 
	 

	AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION

	 
	 

	By:
	 
	/s/ James D. Taiclet, Jr.

	Name:
	 
	James D. Taiclet, Jr.

	Title:
	 
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
#### MOTORS INSURANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Ira FIELDS, Jr., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 15, 1956.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1956.

Claude P. Stephens, Prestonsburg, for appellant.

.Woodrow Burchett, C. B. Latta, Pres-tonsburg, for appellee.

!PER'CURIAM.

This is a motion for an *appeal*from a $2,000 judgment of the Floyd Circuit Court.

Notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days of the entry of the order overruling motion for a new trial as required by subsections (1) and (3) of Section 73.02 of the Civil Rules. The trial court sustained the motion for additional time to file notice of appeal because of excusable neglect, the one exception to the otherwise mandatory time' limit. CR 73.02, subsection (1). We believe this was error.

The first of two grounds upon which the motion (for additional time) was based, that appellant was not apprised of the entry of the order overruling his motion for a new trial, is without merit because a copy of the order was mailed to appellant by appellee’s counsel, as permitted by CR 5 and CR 77.04.

We are not prepared to say that the fact that appellant’s counsel was engaged in other litigation that consumed all his time, the second ground urged for an extension of time, is excusable neglect within the purview of CR 73.02, subsection (1).

We have said that the requirement of the rule of Civil Procedure in regard to the time of filing notice of appeal is jurisdictional and mandatory. See Electric Plant Board of City of Hopkinsville v. Stephens, Ky., 273 S.W.2d 817. Hence, the motion for appeal is denied and the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement

Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the
undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                      |  |                                                
|------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                    |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|                    |  |                     
|Dated: May 14, 2007 |  |                      |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                           
|                    |  | Name:                |  | Mark R. Richards                               
|                    |  | Title:               |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 7.1

  STATEMENT EXPLAINING HOW CERTAIN RATIOS WERE CALCULATED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT

1.   The operating ratio of Guangshen Railway is the ratio of its total railway
     operating expenses in 2006 (in the amount of RMB2,527.9 million, compared
     to RMB2,375.8 million in 2005) to its total railway revenues in 2006 (in
     the amount of RMB3,465.9 million, compared to RMB3,099.5 million in 2005).

2.   Guangshen Railway's total railway operating income ratio is 1 minus the
     operating ratio.

3.   Guangshen Railway's overall operating income ratio is 1 minus the ratio of
     its operating costs in 2006 (in the amount of RMB2,693.9 million, compared
     to RMB2,566.1 million in 2005) to its business revenues in 2006 (in the
     amount of RMB3,594.5 million, compared to RMB3,276.9 million in 2005).
Reinstated; Vacated and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed May 22, 

2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00913-CV

LEON THOMAS, Appellant

V.

CHANDRA JONES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 58th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. A-189,572-A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a partial summary judgment signed August 22, 2012,

which was made final by an order of severance signed September 13, 2012. 

Appellee Chandra Jones sued appellant for personal injuries after an automobile 

accident. After Santa Fe Auto Insurance Company, appellant’s insurer, was placed 

into receivership by the State of Texas and later declared insolvent, the appeal was 

abated pursuant to the Texas Insurance Code. See Tex. Ins. Code §§ 443.008(d); 
2

462.309. After expiration of the period for a stay as set out in Section 462.309, 

appellee requested that we continue the abatement of this appeal so that the parties’ 

settlement of the underlying dispute could be completed. We granted the motion

and extended the abatement.

On May 15, 2014, the parties filed an agreed motion to vacate the judgment 

and remand the case to the trial court for proceedings consistent with their 

settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2). The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal and order the trial court’s judgment 

signed August 22, 2012, vacated and set aside without regard to the merits. We 

remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the 

parties’ settlement agreement.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Donovan and Brown.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following registration statements:



| | (1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-91525) pertaining to The SCPIE Holdings Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-89884) pertaining to The 2001 Amended and Restated Equity Participation Plan of SCPIE Holdings Inc., and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59253) pertaining to The 1997 Equity Participation Plan of SCPIE Holdings Inc.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of SCPIE Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of SCPIE Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ending December 31, 2007.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los
Angeles, California

March 14, 2008
Exhibit 32.3



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                               |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|                    |  |                              
|Dated: May 18, 2005 |  |                               |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                 
|                    |  | Name:                         |  | Mark R. Richards                     
|                    |  | Title:                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Eonorable dohn A. Hulen, Chairmsn, Texas Ilational

CuaM Armory Board Port Worth Club Building Port T0rth, Texas Dear General Buleng

Ill your letter of you state that the Texas Elational elected its seaable to it for

the approprlatienas made e can b% paidby saidBosrd.
re approprl.ated,as the salary Per the traveling expenses for membersand postage, telephone, telegraph, office contingent expenses $1200.00. Parsvf the general provisionaattached to

,page l.292,

general and speoial laws of the 44th Legislature, provides:

*The appropriationsherein protilled are tobe construed as themax%mam sum tobe appropriated to and for the several purposes naned herein, and the rmeunts are Intended to cover, and rhall cover the entire cost of the respective items, an& tbe same shall not be supplelcented

from any other sOurees.wI ,*

honorableJohn A. Hulen - page 8

Since the payment to the secretary of his expenses iu uotinghis household and personal effects from Fort Worth to ilouskon sould bo additional aompensation toNm, the &rd is not authorized to pay said expenses.

You also request our opinion 9s to whether tho hoard can pay the expenses inoident to moving the office furnitureand office files from Fort Worth to iiouston, if the )roard

decided to move its headquarters from Fort Worth toHouston.

As stated above, the Legislaturehas appropriated $lzoo.oOfor postage, telephone, telegraph, office supplies and equipment, and contingent expenses. In our opinion, the expenseincident tomovlng the office furnitureand supplies from Fort Worth to iioustoncan be paid as a contingentexpense out of said @200.00 appropriation.

Very trulyyours ATTORNEX G%NEIUL OF TEXAS

Oeo. W. Barcus Assistant
FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS

12*h Court ofAppeals nistri^

i Y LhnTEXAc

CATHY S.LUSK

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

'•:"\

FILE COPY

8/26/2015 COA No. 12-14-00190-CR

GHAFFER, ALMA MUNOZ Tr. Ct. No. 005-86365-2013 PD-0589-15

Pursuant to Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P., the record is returned to the court of appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION(1)
    /s/ Igor Gonda

President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    /s/ Nancy E. Pecota

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerDated: March 26, 2009
    
    
    
    Dated: March 26, 2009
 
 (1)
    
    This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
Aradigm Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40355

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NELSON LEWIS PETERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:98-CR-40-2

- - - - - - - - - -

November 18, 1999

Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Nelson Lewis Peterson has moved

for leave to withdraw and filed a motion and brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Peterson has not

filed a response to the instant motion. Our independent review

of the motion, brief, and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue

for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130090 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130090 COA: 254934 Wayne CC: 03-011705 GREGORY JAMES JILES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<CIK>                                                   0001012704
<NAME>                                         Ugly Duckling Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                 1,000


<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                          JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                       2,293
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              403,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                                80,698
<INVENTORY>                                                 45,768
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 0
<PP&E>                                                      42,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                              11,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             401,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      354,036
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                   152,955
<OTHER-SE>                                                   9,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               516,513
<SALES>                                                    103,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           124,884
<CGS>                                                       57,766
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            28,082
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            27,560
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           4,919
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              6,557
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 2,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          3,657
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 525
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 4,182
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.28



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 27 (Thursday, February 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02540]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: February 8, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
January 29, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
176 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-169, CP2024-175.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-02540 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
----

----

|   | (1) | the                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September                30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d),                as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                                                                    |
|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |                                                                    |
| Date:                  November 12, 2007 |  /s/                    Thomas J. Ferree                           |
|                                     | Thomas                  J. Ferree                                       |
|                                     | Chief                  Financial Officer and                  Treasurer |
Docket No.: FAA-2011-1321

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 10/7/10

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer

Connie

Arnold

10/7/10

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 10/7/10

ATA Joe White 10/7/10
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SAID FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,608,269
<SECURITIES>                                 7,261,374
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,600,348
<PP&E>                                       1,256,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                 684,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,032,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,171,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,861,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,032,883
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,335,663
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,426,146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,090,483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,090,483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,090,483)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (1,180.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>