6546 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 22 / Thursday, February 1, 2024 / Notices 

(11) If you are a producer, an exporter, 

or a trade/business association of 

producers or exporters of the Subject 

Merchandise in any Subject Country, 

provide the following information on 

your firm’s(s’) operations on that 

product during calendar year 2023 

(report quantity data in short tons and 

value data in U.S. dollars, landed and 

duty-paid at the U.S. port but not 

including antidumping or 

countervailing duties). If you are a 

trade/business association, provide the 

information, on an aggregate basis, for 

the firms which are members of your 

association. 

(a) Production (quantity) and, if 

known, an estimate of the percentage of 

total production of Subject Merchandise 

in each Subject Country accounted for 

by your firm’s(s’) production; 

(b) Capacity (quantity) of your firm(s) 

to produce the Subject Merchandise in 

each Subject Country (that is, the level 

of production that your establishment(s) 

could reasonably have expected to 

attain during the year, assuming normal 

operating conditions (using equipment 

and machinery in place and ready to 

operate), normal operating levels (hours 

per week/weeks per year), time for 

downtime, maintenance, repair, and 

cleanup, and a typical or representative 

product mix); and 

(c) the quantity and value of your 

firm’s(s’) exports to the United States of 

Subject Merchandise and, if known, an 

estimate of the percentage of total 

exports to the United States of Subject 

Merchandise from each Subject Country 

accounted for by your firm’s(s’) exports. 

(12) Identify significant changes, if 

any, in the supply and demand 

conditions or business cycle for the 

Domestic Like Products that have 

occurred in the United States or in the 

market for the Subject Merchandise in 

each Subject Country since the Order 

Dates, and significant changes, if any, 

that are likely to occur within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. Supply 

conditions to consider include 

technology; production methods; 

development efforts; ability to increase 

production (including the shift of 

production facilities used for other 

products and the use, cost, or 

availability of major inputs into 

production); and factors related to the 

ability to shift supply among different 

national markets (including barriers to 

importation in foreign markets or 

changes in market demand abroad). 

Demand conditions to consider include 

end uses and applications; the existence 

and availability of substitute products; 

and the level of competition among the 

Domestic Like Products produced in the 

United States, Subject Merchandise 

produced in each Subject Country, and 

such merchandise from other countries. 

(13) (Optional) A statement of 

whether you agree with the above 

definitions of the Domestic Like 

Products and Domestic Industries; if you 

disagree with either or both of these 

definitions, please explain why and 

provide alternative definitions. 

Authority: This proceeding is being 

conducted under authority of Title VII 

of the Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is 

published pursuant to § 207.61 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 26, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–01933 Filed 1–31–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1370] 

Certain Power Converter Modules and 

Computing Systems Containing the 

Same; Notice of Commission Decision 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Granting an Unopposed Motion To 

Amend the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 18) of the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting an unopposed motion to amend 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation to add DET Logistics 

(USA) Corporation (‘‘DET’’) of Fremont, 

California, as a respondent. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Houda Morad, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–4716. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

17, 2023, the Commission instituted this 

investigation under section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 337’’), based on a 

complaint filed by Vicor Corporation of 

Andover, Massachusetts. See 88 FR 

56050–51 (Aug. 17, 2023). The 

complaint, as supplemented, alleges a 

violation of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain power converter modules and 

computing systems containing the same 

by reason of the infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,166,481; 

9,516,761; and 10,199,950. See id. The 

notice of investigation names the 

following respondents: Delta 

Electronics, Inc. of Taipei, Taiwan; 

Delta Electronics (Americas) Ltd. of 

Fremont, California; Delta Electronics 

(USA) Inc. of Plano, Texas; Cyntec Co., 

Ltd. of Hsinchu, Taiwan; Quanta 

Computer Inc. and Quanta Cloud 

Technology Inc., both of Taoyuan City, 

Taiwan; Quanta Cloud Technology USA 

LLC of San Jose, California; Quanta 

Computer USA Inc. of Fremont, 

California; Hon Hai Precision Industry 

Co. Ltd. (d/b/a, Foxconn Technology 

Group) of Taipei City, Taiwan; Foxconn 

Industrial internet Co. Ltd. of Shenzhen, 

China; FII USA Inc. (a/k/a Foxconn 

Industrial, internet USA Inc.) of 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Ingrasys 

Technology Inc. of Taoyuan City, 

Taiwan; and Ingrasys Technology USA 

Inc. of Fremont, California. See id. The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations is 

also a party to the investigation. See id. 

On December 21, 2023, Complainant 

filed an unopposed motion to amend 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation to add DET as a 

respondent. No response to the motion 

was received. 

On January 2, 2024, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 18) granting 

the motion. The ID finds that, under 

Commission Rule 210.14(b), 19 CFR 

210.14(b), ‘‘good cause exists to allow 

the proposed amendment’’ because 

‘‘Vicor was able to identify DET’s role 

in the supply chain . . . only after 

having received confidential 

information from the Delta Respondents 

during discovery.’’ See ID at 2. In 

addition, the ID finds that ‘‘[t]he 

proposed amendment . . . will not 

prejudice the public interest or the 

rights of the parties to this 

investigation.’’ See id. 

No petition for review of the subject 

ID was filed. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 22 / Thursday, February 1, 2024 / Notices 6547 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID. The complaint 

and notice of investigation are amended 

to add DET as a respondent. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on January 26, 

2024. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: January 29, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–01982 Filed 1–31–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1110 (Third 

Review)] 

Sodium Hexametaphosphate From 

China; Institution of a Five-Year 

Review 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice that it has instituted a review 

pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the 

Act’’), as amended, to determine 

whether revocation of the antidumping 

duty order on sodium 

hexametaphosphate from China would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury. Pursuant 

to the Act, interested parties are 

requested to respond to this notice by 

submitting the information specified 

below to the Commission. 

DATES: Instituted February 1, 2024. To 

be assured of consideration, the 

deadline for responses is March 4, 2024. 

Comments on the adequacy of responses 

may be filed with the Commission by 

April 10, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kenneth Gatten (202–708–1447), Office 

of Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this proceeding may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On March 19, 2008, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) 

issued an antidumping duty order on 

imports of sodium hexametaphosphate 

from China (73 FR 14772). Commerce 

issued a continuation of the 

antidumping duty order on imports of 

sodium hexametaphosphate from China 

following Commerce’s and the 

Commission’s first five-year reviews, 

effective July 17, 2013 (78 FR 42754) 

and second five-year reviews, effective 

March 1, 2019 (84 FR 7021). The 

Commission is now conducting a third 

five-year review pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)), to determine whether 

revocation of the order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to the domestic industry 

within a reasonably foreseeable time. 

Provisions concerning the conduct of 

this proceeding may be found in the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure at 19 CFR part 201, subparts 

A and B, and 19 CFR part 207, subparts 

A and F. The Commission will assess 

the adequacy of interested party 

responses to this notice of institution to 

determine whether to conduct a full or 

expedited review. The Commission’s 

determination in any expedited review 

will be based on the facts available, 

which may include information 

provided in response to this notice. 

Definitions.—The following 

definitions apply to this review: 

(1) Subject Merchandise is the class or 

kind of merchandise that is within the 

scope of the five-year review, as defined 

by Commerce. 

(2) The Subject Country in this review 

is China. 

(3) The Domestic Like Product is the 

domestically produced product or 

products which are like, or in the 

absence of like, most similar in 

characteristics and uses with, the 

Subject Merchandise. In its original 

determination and its expedited first 

and second five-year review 

determinations, the Commission 

defined the Domestic Like Product 

consisting of sodium 

hexametaphosphate, coextensive with 

Commerce’s scope. 

(4) The Domestic Industry is the U.S. 

producers as a whole of the Domestic 

Like Product, or those producers whose 

collective output of the Domestic Like 

Product constitutes a major proportion 

of the total domestic production of the 

product. In its original determination 

and its expedited first and second fiveyear review determinations, the 

Commission defined the Domestic 

Industry consisting of all domestic 

producers of sodium 

hexametaphosphate. 

(5) An Importer is any person or firm 

engaged, either directly or through a 

parent company or subsidiary, in 

importing the Subject Merchandise into 

the United States from a foreign 

manufacturer or through its selling 

agent. 

Participation in the proceeding and 

public service list.—Persons, including 

industrial users of the Subject 

Merchandise and, if the merchandise is 

sold at the retail level, representative 

consumer organizations, wishing to 

participate in the proceeding as parties 

must file an entry of appearance with 

the Secretary to the Commission, as 

provided in § 201.11(b)(4) of the 

Commission’s rules, no later than 21 

days after publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register. The Secretary will 

maintain a public service list containing 

the names and addresses of all persons, 

or their representatives, who are parties 

to the proceeding. 

Former Commission employees who 

are seeking to appear in Commission 

five-year reviews are advised that they 

may appear in a review even if they 

participated personally and 

substantially in the corresponding 

underlying original investigation or an 

earlier review of the same underlying 

investigation. The Commission’s 

designated agency ethics official has 

advised that a five-year review is not the 

same particular matter as the underlying 

original investigation, and a five-year 

review is not the same particular matter 

as an earlier review of the same 

underlying investigation for purposes of 

18 U.S.C. 207, the post-employment 

statute for Federal employees, and 

Commission rule 201.15(b) (19 CFR 

201.15(b)), 79 FR 3246 (Jan. 17, 2014), 

73 FR 24609 (May 5, 2008). 

Consequently, former employees are not 

required to seek Commission approval 

to appear in a review under Commission 

rule 19 CFR 201.15, even if the 

corresponding underlying original 

investigation or an earlier review of the 

same underlying investigation was 

pending when they were Commission 

employees. For further ethics advice on 

this matter, contact Charles Smith, 

Office of the General Counsel, at 202– 

205–3408. 

Limited disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) under an 

administrative protective order (APO) 

and APO service list.—Pursuant to 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1