alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Statement

Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the
undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                      |  |                                                
|------------------------ |  | -------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                         |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|                         |  |                     
|Dated: November 13, 2006 |  |                      |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                           
|                         |  | Name:                |  | Mark R. Richards                               
|                         |  | Title:               |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
1 The Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-3568

___________ Jonathan Scott Dexter, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 7, 2011 Filed: April 14, 2011

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jonathan Scott Dexter appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. After careful review of the record, see Gates v. Astrue , 627 F.3d 1080, 1082 (8th Ci r. 2010) (standard of review), we find (1) that the administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) credibility determination is entitle d to deference, seeHalverson v. Astrue , 600 F.3d 922, 932 (8th-2- Cir. 2010); (2) that the ALJ properly di scounted opinions from a treating counselor and a consulting psychologist on Dexte r’s residual functional capacity, seeKirby v. Astrue , 500 F.3d 705, 709 (8th Cir. 2007) (consulting physician’s opinion is not entitled to special deference, especially when it is based largely on claimant’s subjective complaints); cf. Hacker v. Barnhart , 459 F.3d 934, 937 (8th Cir. 2006) (ALJ may elect in certain circumstances not to give controlling weight to treating physician’s opinion, as record must be ev aluated as whole; treating physician’s own inconsistency may diminish or eliminate we ight accorded to his opinion); (3) that the ALJ’s hypothetical to a vocati onal expert was proper, see Guilliams v. Barnhart , 393 F.3d 798, 804 (8th Cir. 2005) (proper hypothe tical sets forth impairments supported by substantial evidence and accepted as trueby ALJ); and (4) that Dexter failed to meet his burden of showing he met the require ments of listings that he identifies, see Carlson v. Astrue , 604 F.3d 589, 593 (8th Cir. 2010) (burden is on claimant to establish that he meets or equals listing; im pairment must meet all criteria for listing). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 372

To provide for making a temporary judgeship for the northern district of

Alabama permanent, and creating a new judgeship for the middle district

of Alabama.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 8 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. HEFLIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for making a temporary judgeship for the northern district of Alabama permanent, and creating a new

judgeship for the middle district of Alabama.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS IN ALABAMA.

4 (a) EXISTING JUDGESHIP MADE PERMANENT.—The

5 existing district judgeship for the northern district of Ala6 bama authorized under section 203(c)(1) of the Federal

7 Judgeship Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–650; 104 Stat.

8 5101; 28 U.S.C. 133 note) shall, as of the effective date

9 of this Act, be authorized under section 133 of title 28,
2

•S 372 IS

1 United States Code, and the incumbent in such office shall

2 hold the office under section 133 of title 28, United States

3 Code, as amended by this section.

4 (b) ADDITIONAL JUDGESHIP.—The President shall

5 appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate,

6 1 additional district judge for the middle district of Ala7 bama.

8 (c) TABLES.—In order that the table contained in

9 section 133 of title 28, United States Code, shall, with

10 respect to each judicial district in Alabama, reflect the

11 changes in the total number of permanent district judge12 ships authorized as a result of subsections (a) and (b) of

13 this section, such table is amended by amending the item

14 relating to Alabama to read as follows:

‘‘Alabama:

‘‘Northern ................................................................................ 8

‘‘Middle .................................................................................... 4

‘‘Southern ................................................................................. 3.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION



I, Dale E. Parker, Chief Financial Officer of Paperweight Development Corp., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paperweight Development Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 18, 2005



|           |  |                                       
|---------- |  | --------------------------------------
|           | 
|Signature: |  | /s/ Dale E. Parker                    
|           |  | Dale E. Parker Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
33-64512, 33-65414, 33-97512 and 33-88114 of Pacific Sunwear of California,
Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 11, 1997, appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. for the year ended
February 2, 1997.


                                              DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


Costa Mesa, California
March 31, 1997
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date
of report (Date of earliest event reported): January 27, 2009
 Shopoff Properties Trust, Inc.
 
  Maryland
 
 333-139042
    
    20-5882165(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 8951 Research Drive, Irvine, California
    
    92618(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (877) 874-7348
 
 Not applicable
 
 see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17
CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---





TABLE OF CONTENTS




|                                                 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
|Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits    
|SIGNATURE                                       
|EXHIBIT INDEX                                   
|EX-10.1                                         



---



##### Table of Contents






1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement    
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description10.1
    
    Amendment to Purchase and Sale and Joint Escrow
Instructions by and between TSG Little Valley, L.P. and Shopoff Advisors, L.P.,
dated January 27, 2009.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  SHOPOFF PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.Date:
February 2, 2009By:
    
    /s/ William A. Shopoff

William A. ShopoffPresident, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the
Board of Directors




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit No.
    
    Description10.1
    
    Amendment to Purchase and Sale and Joint
Escrow Instructions by and between TSG Little Valley, L.P. and
Shopoff Advisors, L.P.,
dated January 27, 2009.
#### Billy Joe MINCHEW, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 35695.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 24, 1963.

*943Jack Little, Clyde E. Thomas, Sr., George T. Thomas and Roger D. Brown, Big Spring, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

•WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The appeal is from an order entered in the County Court of Howard County in a cause originating in the Justice Court finding the appeal bond defective and invalid and granting the state’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

This Court has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from the order of the County Court dismissing the appeal. Matula v. State, 72 Tex.Cr.R. 189, 161 S.W. 965; Osborne v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 336 S.W.2d 433; McCandless v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 343 S.W.2d 262; Martin v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 346 S.W.2d 840; See also Joseph v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 85, 274 S.W.2d 689.

An examination of the appeal bond filed in the County Court shows that the trial court did not err in finding the appeal bond filed in that court defective and invalid, hence did not err in dismissing the appeal.

The trial court’s order further shows that after the appeal bond was found and adjudged to be defective and invalid, and the defendant excepted, “The Defendant then filed a motion, accompanied by an appeal bond duly approved by the Judge of the Court from which this cause was appealed, requesting leave of the Court to file such amended bond in lieu of the appeal bond adjudged to be invalid by the Court, to which motion and the bond attached thereto reference is here made for further description thereof, which motion was, and is, hereby refused and overruled, to which action of the Court the Defendant then and there excepted.”

The appellant does not challenge the court’s ruling that the appeal bond filed in the County Court within the time allowed by statute was invalid. His complaint is that, having determined such *bond to he*de - fective, the trial judge refused to allow him to amend it by filing the new bond he tendered.

We are without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal from the order refusing’ to permit the filing of the new bond. Payne v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 342 S.W.2d 580; McKee v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 399, 242 S. W.2d 884.

The judgment dismissing the appeal is affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek reinstatement of his appeal from justice court to the county court by mandamus to require the trial court to permit the amendment of his appeal bond from justice court.
Date:
December 14, 2009


Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION




I, Craig
Wagenschutz, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Megola, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and




5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      December 14, 2009/s/
      CRAIG WAGENSCHUTZCraig
      WagenschutzChief
      Financial Officer
Date:
April 2, 2009


Exhibit
31




CERTIFICATION




I, Joel
Gardner, President, CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Megola, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and




5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      April 2, 2009/s/ JOEL GARDNERJoel
      GardnerPresident,
      CEO, Principal FinancialOfficer
      and Principal Accounting
Officer
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 05104

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

05104\05104_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 05104\05104_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05104\05104_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05104\05104_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05104\05104_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 05104\05104_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05104\Certification Statement Plant ID 05104.pdf Plant certification statement

x 05104\Supplemental Documents\05104_Effluent ICR extension July 26 2010.pdf Follow-up correspondence and materials for the survey.

x 05104\Supplemental Documents\05104_Effluent ICR Part A Question 5-2 site plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05104\Supplemental Documents\05104_Effluent ICR Part A Question 5-3 water balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 05104\05104_Checklist_WORKING FILE.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05104\05104_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00070-CV

Terracon Consultants, Inc., Appellant

v.

Fort Worth Design & Build, Inc. d/b/a DB Constructors, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 277TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 11-181-C277, HONORABLE KEN ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant and appellee have filed a joint motion to dismissthe appeal, explaining that

they have settled their dispute. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: October 15, 2013
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on thedate hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019(“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: August 5, 2019 

 

/s/ *DavidGladstone*                            

David Gladstone

Chief Executive Officer and

Chairman of the Board of Directors
**