alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Clarence JOHNSON, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 15, 1956.

*551Shuffett & Butler, Greensburg, for appellant.

Jo M. Ferguson, Atty. Gen., Wm. F. Simpson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Clarence Johnson, was sentenced to thirty days in 'jail and fined $50 for transporting an intoxicating malt beverage (beer) for sale in local option territory. His automobile was stopped by a State Trooper ostensibly to check appellant’s driver’s license after the Trooper had received a telephone call from police headquarters to the effect that appellant probably had beer in the car. The Trooper testified that he asked the appellant what he was hauling, and appellant voluntarily opened the trunk of the car which revealed the presence of six cases of beer, whereupon the Trooper took appellant to the Sheriff’s office and swore out a warrant for his arrest. The Sheriff testified that the appellant had a current reputation for trafficking in alcoholic beverages in local option territory.

The appellant admitted he opened the trunk of his car when the Trooper asked him if he minded opening the trunk and letting the Trooper see what was in it. In fact, the appellant told the Trooper,. *“I*said, no, I don’t mind,” that is, opening the trunk. Later on in his testimony the appellant claimed he opened the trunk on order of the Trooper.

The appellant contends that the search was illegal and the evidence resulting therefrom was incompetent and inadmissible. His contention is based on the theory that no offense had been committed in the presence of the officer and the officer had no warrant authorizing the search. The Commonwealth asserts that the search was made with the consent of the appellant, and hence was legal and the- evidence thereby obtained was competent. The trial court submitted to the jury the question of whether the search was made with the consent of the appellant and directed that he be acquitted if it was not made with his consent.

The State Police have a statutory duty to enforce the motor vehicle laws of the state, and may at any time require a motorist to display his driver’s license. KRS 186.510. In the case at bar, there is really no conflicting evidence as to whether the search was consented to by the appellant although that question was submitted to the jury to resolve. It is compulsory search without a warrant which the Constitution enjoins, not a search consented to by the one whose person or property is searched. At the time the search was made the appellant was not under arrest and his disclosure of the contents of his automobile was made without any charge being made against him. However, where the search was made with consent, as the jury held this one was, it was legal and the evidence thus obtained competent and admissible. Pigg v. Commonwealth, Ky., 284 S.W.2d 670.

The judgment is affirmed.
Order - Page 1 of 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0633

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

DAVID RAY SCHULTZ,

 Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is 

granted an extension of time to and including March 1, 2024, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Dated this ____ day of February, 2024.

Supreme Court Justice

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 26 2024

02/26/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0633
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF APPLIED ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          26,219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,524
<ALLOWANCES>                                       109
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,083
<PP&E>                                          40,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,382
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,449
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      66,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,449
<SALES>                                         65,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,401
<CGS>                                           33,378
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,378
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 893
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                       781
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,255
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-19-00022-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court No. 048-286132-16

Before Bassel, Kerr, and Pittman, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE HARRIET NICHOLSON, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief are denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 7, 2019
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 50235 Conference Calendar

Consol idated with 18

- 50292
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARTIN AGUAYO

- LOPEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:17

- CR

- 1019

- 1 USDC No. 2:17

- CR

- 813

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Martin Aguayo

- Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited ci rcumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 1, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-50235 Document: 00514896340 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2019No. 18

- 50235 c/w No. 18

- 50292

2 Cir. 2011). Aguayo

- Lope z h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal s present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s mot ion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL S ARE DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-50235 Document: 00514896340 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/01/2019
ZucKERT ScouTT 

RASENBERGER 

WILLIAM H. CALLAWAY, JR. 

September 16, 2014 

Via regulations.gov and electronic mail 

Robert Finamore 

Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

888 Seventeenth Street, Nw, Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006-3309 

Phone 202.298.8660 

Fax 202.342.0683 

www:zsrla>v.com 

whcallaway@zsrlaw.com 

Re: Joint Application of Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. and LAN Peru S.A. 

for Blanket Statements of Authorization; Docket OST-2014-0161 

Dear Mr. Finamore: 

We have polled the air carrier representatives on the attached service list regarding the 

above-referenced Joint Application and received no objections. Accordingly, we respectfully 

request expedited consideration of this Joint Application. 

Very truly yours, 

(.;J~*Q~~z... William H. Callaway, Jr. 

Counsel to Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd. 

cc: All parties listed on attached service list 

Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P. 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I caused a copy of the foregoing letter to be served, this 16th day of 

September, 2014, via email transmission, on the following persons: 

howard.kass@aa.com 

ro beti. wirick@aa. com 

sascha. vanderbellen@del ta. com 

sametta.c. barnett@delta. com 

sllunsford@fedex.com 

sharon.pasley@fedex.com 

gbleopard@fedex.com 

perkmann@cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines) 

jhill@cooley.com (Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines) 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

peter. beckett@po laraircargo. com 

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit Airlines) 

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit Airlines) 

dan. weiss@united.com 

gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United Airlines) 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) 

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) 

david.christofano@dot. gov 

robeti.finamore@dot.gov 

brett.kruger@dot. gov 

john.s.duncan@faa.gov 

info@airlineinfo.com 

Zuckert, Scoutt & Rasenberger, L.L.P. 

Bryant Templeton
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): January 29, 2009
 Conexant Systems, Inc.
  Delaware
    
    000-24923
    
    25-1799439(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 4000 MacArthur Boulevard, Newport 
Beach, California
    
    92660(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESExhibit IndexEX-99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
 http://www.conexant.com/ir




---



##### Table of Contents








---



##### Table of Contents



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Conexant Systems, Inc.January 29, 2009
    By:
    Jean HuName:
    Jean HuTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Business Development




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 ExhibitNo.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release of Registrant dated
January 29, 2009.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7786
RICHARD GRIFFIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ELIZABETH D. SCHER, individually and in herofficial capacity; STERLING HALE MOORE, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1192-AM) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Virginia inmate, app eals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Griffin v. Scher , No. CA-96-1192-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 22, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ADVANCE
PARADIGM, INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998. 
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          51,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                       192
<INVENTORY>                                      1,859
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,727
<PP&E>                                           9,541
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,152
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,490
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,914
<SALES>                                        256,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,450
<CGS>                                          245,466
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  245,466
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,115)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,564
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,226
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,226
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .35
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 22 (Thursday, February 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6558-6559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Capital Formation 
Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Tuesday, February 27, 
2024, at the Commission's headquarters and via videoconference.

PLACE: The meeting will be hybrid, with some Committee members 
attending by remote means (videoconference) and others in-person at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, in 
the Multi-Purpose Room LL-006. Members of the public may watch the 
webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

STATUS: The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public via webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov. This 
Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the 
Commission may attend the meeting.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda for the meeting includes matters 
relating to rules and regulations affecting small and emerging 
businesses and their investors under the federal securities laws.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.


[[Page 6559]]


    Dated: January 29, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-02041 Filed 1-29-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1


                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR
                      RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly  report of Internal Hydro  International,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Craig A. Huffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: December 15, 2005                         By: /s/ Craig A. Huffman
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Craig A. Huffman
                                                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R. B.Harris, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Sales  Strategies,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors:

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 22, 2003               /s/ R. B. Harris
                                      -------------------------------
                                       R. B. Harris
                                       President/ CEO/Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
      ( print page 8220)    
*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HHS-NIH-CDC-SBIR PHS 2024-1 Phase I: Development of Long-Acting Treatments for HCV Cure (Topic 125).                    

*Date:*                         March 1, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Samita S. Andreansky, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, MSC 9834, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2915,                         *samita.andreansky@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 1, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-02346 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P