alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

AMENDED ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00490-CV

Style: In the Interest of K.M., Child

Date motion filed*: July 28, 2014

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: August 4, 2014

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: August 4, 2014

Date Requested: September 3, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: September 3, 2014

 No further extensions of time will be granted.

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

This Court’s August 12, 2014 Order on Motion is amended as follows: The 

motion for extension of time is granted, but no further extensions will be

granted in this accelerated appeal in a parental termination case. Appellant’s

brief is to be filed no later than September 3, 2014.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 

Panel consists of ____________________________________________

Date: August 26, 2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      18,982,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,933,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,811,000
<PP&E>                                       2,193,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 586,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,793,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,321,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,226,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,793,000
<SALES>                                    157,068,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           157,068,000
<CGS>                                       87,739,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              146,079,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,172,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,357,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,815,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,815,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .88


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.55

                          Coinmach Laundry Corporation
                               Lock-Up Agreement



                                              July 23, 1996


Lehman Brothers Inc.
Dillon Read & Co.
Lazard Freres & Co., LLC
Fieldstone FPCG Services, Inc.
as Representatives of the
Several Underwriters
c/o Lehman Brothers Inc.
Three World Financial Center
New York, New York  10285


Ladies and Gentlemen:

          The undersigned, as a holder of securities of Coinmach Laundry
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), irrevocably agrees not to,
directly or indirectly, without the prior written approval of Lehman Brothers
Inc., offer, sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of the Company's capital
stock (the "Common Stock") (or enter into any transaction or device that is
designed to, or could be expected to, result in the disposition of any shares of
Common Stock) or sell or grant options, rights or warrants with respect to any
shares of Common Stock of the Company (the "Securities") that the undersigned
may own directly or indirectly for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days
(the "Lock-up Period") following the day on which the Form S-1 Registration
Statement (the "Registration Statement") filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on May 13, 1996 on behalf of the Company in connection with the
initial public offering of the Company's Class A common stock, par value $.01
per share (the "Offering"), shall become effective by order of the Securities
and Exchange Commission.

          The undersigned understands that the underwriters and the Company will
rely upon the representations set forth in this Agreement in proceeding with the
Offering.  The undersigned understands that this Agreement is irrevocable and
shall be binding on the undersigned and the undersigned's successors, heirs,
personal representatives and assigns.  The undersigned agrees and consents to
the entry of stop transfer instructions with the Company's transfer agent
against the transfer of Securities of the Company held by the undersigned except
in compliance with this Agreement.

                                      -1-
<PAGE>
 
          Notwithstanding anything else herein, if the Offering is not
consummated on or before September 30, 1996, the terms and provisions of this
Agreement shall be of no further force or effect.


                              COINMACH LAUNDRY CORPORATION

 
                                    
                              By:  /s/ ROBERT M. DOYLE 
                                  -------------------------------
                                  Name:  Robert M. Doyle
                                  Title: Senior Vice President

                                      -2-
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Medical CBRN Defense Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 5, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Medical CBRN Defense 
Consortium (``MCDC'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, ARServices Limited, Falls Church, VA; DKW Consulting LLC, 
Tallahassee, FL; GW Medical Systems Information Technologies Inc dba GE 
HealthCare Technology & Innovation Center, Niskayuna, NY; Goldbelt Hawk 
LLC, Newport News, VA; and Sentio BioSciences LLC, Maryland Heights, 
MO, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Clarifia Inc, New York, NY; Conductive Technologies Inc, 
York, PA; Government Scientific Source, Reston, VA; Kleo 
Pharmaceuticals, New Haven, CT; Locus Biosciences, Morrisville, NC; 
Pertexa Healthcare Technologies, Ridgecrest, CA; SX2 Technologies LLC, 
Port Washington, WI; and Trauma Insight LLC dba LumaBridge LLC, San 
Antonio, TX, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and MCDC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 13, 2015, MCDC filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
January 6, 2016 (81 FR 513).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 13, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on December 15, 2023 (88 FR 86938).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-02260 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
II

Calendar No. 4

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 25

To stop the waste of taxpayer funds on activities by Government agencies

to encourage its employees or officials to accept homosexuality as a

legitimate or normal lifestyle.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

JANUARY 5, 1995

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To stop the waste of taxpayer funds on activities by Government agencies to encourage its employees or officials

to accept homosexuality as a legitimate or normal lifestyle.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON USE OF APPROPRIATED

4 FUNDS.

5 No funds appropriated out of the Treasury of the

6 United States may be used by any entity to fund, promote,
2

•S 25 PCS

1 or carry out any seminar or program for employees of the

2 Government, or to fund any position in the Government,

3 the purpose of which is to compel, instruct, encourage,

4 urge, or persuade employees or officials to—

5 (1) recruit, on the basis of sexual orientation,

6 homosexuals for employment with the Government;

7 or

8 (2) embrace, accept, condone, or celebrate ho9 mosexuality as a legitimate or normal lifestyle.

Calendar No. 4

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 25

A BILL

To stop the waste of taxpayer funds on activities by

mate or normal lifestyle.or officials to accept homosexuality as a legitiGovernment agencies to encourage its employees

JANUARY 5, 1995

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report of Norwood Financial Corp. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), We, Lewis J. Critelli,
President and Chief Executive Officer and William S. Lance, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.














/s/
      Lewis J. Critelli
            
            /s/
      William S. LanceLewis
      J. Critelli
            
            William
      S. LancePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
            
            Senior
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








March 15,
2010
#### Donn G. HOLIEN et ux., Appellants, v. Lloyd Thomas BRIGGS, Appellee.

No. 16204.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

March 17, 1961.

Mays & Mays and Charles Mays, Jr., ■Fort Worth, for appellants.

Byrom, Wright & Butcher and Robert L. Wright, Fort Worth, for appellee.

RENFRO, Justice.

Plaintiff, formerly Mrs. Briggs, and defendant Briggs were divorced on June 27, 1958, and custody of their two children was awarded to defendant.

In October, 1959, plaintiff filed suit for change of custody on grounds of alleged material changes. On the hearing she failed to prove any change except her remarriage and acquisition of a home.

Findings of fact by the trial court included findings that the children were well cared for by defendant, were happy and well adjusted and their physical and mental adjustment had improved since the divorce, that they were receiving excellent care, and that defendant was a fit and proper person to have custody of the children. The court concluded that no change of circumstances had occurred since the original custody hearing in so far as the children were concerned, and that the best interest of the children would be served by retention of custody by the defendant.

The fact findings are fully supported by the evidence.

It is true plaintiff has, since the original custody order was entered, married and established a home. But whether or not such a change warrants a change of custody is a question within the discretion of the trial court. Son v. McConnell, Tex.Civ.App., 228 S.W.2d 290, refused; Wade v. Shaughnessy, Tex.Civ.App., 231 S.W.2d 494, refused; Bryant v. Birdsong, Tex.Civ.App., 277 S.W.2d 922.

A change of custody should be ordered only when the trial court is convinced that the change is to be a positive improvement for the child. Taylor v. Meek, 154 Tex. 305, 276 S.W.2d 787.

The trial judge is vested with liberal discretion in determining the custody of *892minor children. He sees the parties and observes their demeanor and personalities. He is in a better position to analyze the facts, weigh the virtues of the parties and determine what will be for the best interest of the minor child than can be ascertained by reading the record. Therefore, the awarding of the custody of a minor child will not be disturbed on appeal unless the award is so contrary to the great preponderance of the evidence as to show an abuse of discretion. Bryant v. Birdsong, supra; Valentine v. Valentine, Tex.Civ.App., 203 S.W.2d 693; Moser v. Duck, Tex.Civ.App., 287 S.W.2d 214; Wooster v. Thompson, Tex.Civ.App., 285 S.W.2d 954.

The same judge heard the evidence in both trials. After hearing all the evidence in the instant case he was convinced there had been no material change and that it was for the best interest of the children to remain in the custody of the defendant. In view of the record before us, we cannot say he abused his discretion.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Bikers Dream, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 27, 1996, on our
audit of the financial statements of Bikers Dream, Inc. as of and for the year
ended December 31, 1995, which report is included in the 1996 Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to substantial doubt
about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.


/s/  COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Newport Beach, California
May 7, 1997
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 392

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 with

regard to appointment of members of the Dayton Aviation Heritage

Commission, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. GLENN (for himself and Mr. DEWINE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

A BILL

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act

of 1992 with regard to appointment of members of the

Dayton Aviation Heritage Commission, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MEMBERSHIP OF THE DAYTON AVIATION HER4 ITAGE COMMISSION.

5 Section 201(b) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Pres6 ervation Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 421ww–21) is amended

7 in each of paragraphs (2), (4), (5), (6), and (7) by striking
2

•S 392 IS

1 ‘‘from recommendations’’ and inserting ‘‘after consider2 ation of recommendations’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.22

 

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

We pay our non-employee directors, who consist of all our directors other than our chief executive officer, an annual fee of $75,000 for their services as directors. We pay an annual fee of $25,000 to the chair of our audit committee, $20,000 to the chair of our compensation committee, $10,000 to the chairs of our executive committee and our nominating and corporate governance committee, and $5,000 to each non-employee director who serves as a member, but not the chair, of any committee for service on each committee above one. Our chairman also receives an annual fee of $150,000, as well as office space, support services and healthcare benefits, for his services as chairman of our board of directors. Directors who are employees do not receive separate fees for their services as directors. All of the payments described in this paragraph are made in cash.

 

Under the terms of our 2006 equity incentive plan, each director who is not employed by, and does not provide independent contractor services as a consultant or advisor to, us or our subsidiaries receives automatic restricted stock awards. We refer to these directors as our “outside directors.” Currently, our outside directors are Dr. Rowland Moriarty, Prof. Robert Holthausen, Messrs. William Concannon, Thomas Avery and William Schleyer and Mme. Nancy Hawthorne. Each outside director who is re-elected as one of our directors at, or whose term continues after, our annual meeting of shareholders will, on the date of the meeting, receive a restricted stock award, vesting in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, valued at $75,000, based on the closing price of our common stock as of that date. Each person who is first elected an outside director at our annual meeting of shareholders will receive, on the date of his or her election, a restricted stock award, vesting in four equal annual installments beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant, in an amount to be determined by our board of directors.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus constituting
part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-52081 and No.
333-72037) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-15947, No.
333-62039 and No. 333-92169) of our report dated February 18, 2000, with respect
to the financial statements of Aradigm Corporation included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
March 1, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8242-8243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--MLCommons Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 22, 2024, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), MLCommons Association 
(``MLCommons'') filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Blaine Rister (individual member), Burlingame, CA; Wayne 
Wei Wang (individual member), Hong Kong, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; 
Liu Ke (individual member), San Jose, CA; Chen-Yu Ho (individual 
member), Changhua County, TAIWAN; OMOIKANE A.I. Ltd., London, UNITED 
KINGDOM; Yue Hu (individual member), Los Altos, CA; and Wiwynn 
Corporation, New Taipei City, TAIWAN have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    Also, Baidu USA LLC, Sunnyvale, CA; and Deci.ai, Ramat Gan, ISRAEL 
have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and MLCommons intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On September 15, 2020, MLCommons filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department

[[Page 8243]]

of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on September 29, 2020 (85 FR 61032).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 2, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on December 15, 2023 (88 FR 86939).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-02283 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
II

Calendar No. 97

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 522

[Report No. 104–74]

To provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions

of part I of the Federal Power Act for certain transmission facilities

associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 9 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1995

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

APRIL 27 (legislative day, APRIL 24), 1995

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To provide for a limited exemption to the hydroelectric licensing provisions of part I of the Federal Power Act for

certain transmission facilities associated with the El

Vado Hydroelectric Project in New Mexico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 522 RS

1 SECTION 1. LIMITED EXEMPTION.

2 (a) EXEMPTION.—Part I of the Federal Power Act,

3 and the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory

4 Commission under such part I, shall not apply to the

5 transmission line facilities associated with the El Vado

6 Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project No. 5226–002)

7 which are described in subsection (b).

8 (b) FACILITIES COVERED BY EXEMPTION.—The fa9 cilities to which the exemption under subsection (a) ap10 plies are those transmission facilities located near the Rio

11 Chama, a tributary of the Rio Grande, in Rio Arriba

12 County, New Mexico, referred to as the El Vado trans13 mission line, a three phase 12-mile long 69 kV power line

14 installed within a 50-foot wide right-of-way in Rio Arriba

15 County, New Mexico, originating at the El Vado Project’s

16 switchyard and connecting to the Spills 69 kV Switching

17 Station operated by the Northern Arriba Electric Coopera18 tive, Inc.

Calendar No. 97

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 522

[Report No. 104–74]

A BILL

To provide for a limited exemption to the hydroProject in New Mexico. associated with the El Vado Hydroelectric eral Power Act for certain transmission facilities electric licensing provisions of part I of the FedAPRIL 27 (legislative day, APRIL 24), 1995

Reported without amendment