alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0041

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM227AD

747-25A3086, R4 --- 4/26/01

747-25-3086, R3 --- 7/8/99

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,275
<INVENTORY>                                      4,964
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,087
<PP&E>                                           8,702
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,193
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,311
<BONDS>                                         33,262
<COMMON>                                           252
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,193
<SALES>                                         29,920
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,920
<CGS>                                           21,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,593
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    149
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10232 

__________________

DANIEL JOE HITTLE,

 Plaintiff-Counter-

 Defendant-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF GARLAND TEXAS,

 Defendant-Counter Claimant- 

 Appellee,

and

GARLAND POLICE DEP'T; JOHN

DOES, 1-10, J.G. GEORGE, City

of Garland Police Officer; D. SWAVEY, 

City of Garland Police Officer; 

D.W. ROEHRIG, City of Garland Police

Officer; J. HOLMES, City of Garland Police 

Officer; S.A. CROSS, City of Garland

Police Officer,

Defendants. 

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:91-CV-2621-T

- - - - - - - - - -

(August 11, 1995)

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, KING, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In this civil rights case, the plaintiff has filed a notice of

appeal from a interlocutory judgment entered February 6, 1995,
No. 95-10232

-2-

dismissing his claims against the City of Garland, Texas. The

plaintiff's claims against five other individual defendants remain

to be adjudicated. The appellee correctly argues that the order is

not appealable.

When an action involves multiple parties or multiple claims,

any decision that adjudicates the liability of fewer than all the

parties or disposes of fewer than all the claims does not terminate

the litigation and is therefore not appealable unless certified

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). See Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243,

1245 (5th Cir. 1985). The district court has not certified the

order for appeal. Accordingly, this court is without jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6394

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ROY ALANZO RHYMER, III , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. ( 1:19

- cr - 00427

- WO

- 1 )

Submitted : October 18, 2022 Decided: October 21, 2022

Before WYNN and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Roy Alanzo Rhymer, III , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6394 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/21/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Roy Alanzo Rhymer, III, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, 132 Stat. 5194. We review the district court’s order for abuse of discret ion. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). A district court abuses its discretion when it “acts arbitrarily or irrationally, . . . fails to consider judicially recognized factors constraining its exercise of discretion, . . . relies on erroneous factual or legal premises, or . . . commits an error of law.” United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 187 (4th Cir. 2021) (cleaned up). After reviewing the record in this case, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in weighing the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and concluding they did not support granting Rhymer’s motion. Therefore, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6394 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/21/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
SRS Labs, Inc. pertaining to SRS Labs, Inc. Stock Option Agreement dated January
19, 1994 between SRS Labs, Inc. and Stephen V. Sedmak on Form S-8 of our report
dated May 10, 1996 (except for information pertaining to the reverse stock split
and reincorporation described in Note 1 as to which the date is June 28, 1996),
appearing in the Company's Prospectus dated August 8, 1996, filed with the
Commission on August 12, 1996, pursuant to Rule 424(b).


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Costa Mesa, California
December 30, 1996
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: March 26, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    DONALD J. ZUK                 
|                      |  |  |  |                                      
|                      |  |  |  | Donald J. Zuk Chief Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



---

Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|Dated: March 26, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    ROBERT B. TSCHUDY                 
|                      |  |  |  |                                          
|                      |  |  |  | Robert B. Tschudy Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 480

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel GLEAM.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 2 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 22), 1995

Mrs. HUTCHISON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

GLEAM.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the
2

S 480 IS

1 coastwise trade for the vessel GLEAM, (United States of2 ficial number 921594).

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 313 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 313

   For the relief of Luis A. Gonzalez and Virginia Aguilla Gonzalez.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 1 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Exon introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   For the relief of Luis A. Gonzalez and Virginia Aguilla Gonzalez.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Luis A. 
Gonzalez and Virginia Aguilla Gonzalez shall be held and considered to 
have been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent 
residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment of 
the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Luis A. Gonzalez and 
Virginia Aguilla Gonzalez as provided in this Act, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number during 
the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available 
to natives of the country of each alien's birth under section 203(a) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the periodic report of Decision Diagnostics Corp. (f/k/a instaCare Corp.) (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer May 20, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      63,502,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         159,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                454,400,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                  1,027,872,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 15,404,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,646,380,000
<DEPOSITS>                               1,330,531,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                47,598,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         25,736,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 70,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,250,000
<COMMON>                                       200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 163,065,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,646,380,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             90,192,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           29,644,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               785,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           120,621,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          52,266,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          57,166,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       63,455,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                9,700,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           7,669,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             50,212,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             24,638,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  24,638,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                16,970,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.24
<LOANS-NON>                                  6,223,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,347,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               436,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            10,116,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                5,327,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   915,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           15,404,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        15,404,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Lacy HELVEY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 3, 1965.

Francis Dale Burke, Pikeville, for appellant.

Robert Matthews, Atty. Gen., David Mur-rell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

*781PALMORE, Judge.

Lacy Helvey was found guilty of illegally possessing alcoholic beverages in local option territory for the purpose of sale. His punishment was fixed at a $100 fine and 30 days in jail. KRS 242.230(1) and 242.-990(1). He moves for an appeal pursuant to KRS 21.140(2).

In his opening statement to the jury the attorney for the Commonwealth disclosed that the case for the prosecution would consist of proof that on January 10, 1964, a state ABC officer accompanied by a state trooper went to Helvey’s home in Pike County and bought some whiskey from him. Counsel for the defense moved that the statement be stricken and the jury discharged on the ground that illegal possession and illegal sale are separate offenses, neither of which may be used as evidence to prove the other.

Helvey denied having sold any liquor at all. He testified that on the next day after January 10, 1964, his home was searched pursuant to a warrant but that nothing was found. This is the event, he contends, on which he expected the prosecution to be founded. On the other hand, since the search had not resulted in any incriminating evidence it is difficult to believe that he actually thought the prosecution would be based on it.

It was held in Newton v. Commonwealth, 198 Ky. 707, 249 S.W. 1017 (1923), that selling and possession for sale are separate offenses if committed at different times, but that one cannot be convicted of both if the possession is only that which he had incident to and at the time of the sale. This, however, is quite a different matter from proof of a sale as evidence to sustain a charge of illegal possession. There is no rule against that. It may be that Helvey anticipated some other kind of evidence, but it can hardly be denied that none could have had more relevance and probative force than proof of an actual sale.

A second count of the indictment alleged that in 1960 Helvey had been convicted in a magistrate’s court of a similar offense. The attempt to prove this allegation failed because of the inadequacy of the magistrate’s records, hence the instructions given by the trial court did not authorize a second-offense conviction. Meanwhile the jurors heard the magistrate testify that Helvey had been convicted in his court on a guilty plea and had been fined, but there was no motion for a mistrial. Under the circumstances we cannot say the appellant was deprived of a fair trial.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company),
hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 4, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                      |  |                       |  |                                           
|------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 17, 2004 |  |  |  |                      |  | /s/    DALE E. PARKER
|                    |  |  |  |                      |  |                       | 
|                    |  |  |  |                      |  | Name:                 |  | Dale E. Parker                            
|                    |  |  |  |                      |  | Title:                |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:30 a.m. EDT, Wednesday, February 21, 2024.

# PLACE: 

Virtual.

# STATUS: 

The one item may be viewed by the public through webcast only.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

70760 Highway Investigative Report—Collapse of the Fern Hollow Bridge, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, January 28, 2022.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Candi Bing at (202) 590-8384 or by email at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov.*

*Media Information Contact:*                         Sarah Sulick by email at                         *sarah.sulick@ntsb.gov*                         or at (202) 314-6100.                    

                        This meeting will take place virtually. The public may view it through a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “Upcoming Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

                        Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also available at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

The National Transportation Safety Board is holding this meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).

 Dated: February 1, 2024.

Candi R. Bing,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-02411 Filed 2-2-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P