alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Filed 3/13/13 P. v. Taylor CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Shasta)

----

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. STEWART BRADLEY TAYLOR, Defendant and Appellant. C070610 (Super. Ct. No. 11F7279)

Defendant Stewart Bradley Taylor pleaded no contest to possession of methamphetamine and violating a domestic rela tions restraining order, and was sentenced to a prison term of two years eight months. The trial court awarded defendant 15 days of actual time credit, plus 6 days of conduct cr edit, for a total of 21 days of presentence custody credit. Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that he should have received day-for-day credits. The People concede the error and we agree.2 Effective October 1, 2011, the Legisl ature amended Penal Code section 4019 1 to allow all defendants serving pres entence time in county jail to be eligible for day-for-day credits. (Stats. 2011, ch. 15, § 482, eff. Ap r. 4, 2011; Stats 2011, ch. 39, § 53; Stats. 2011-2012, 1st Ex. Sess., ch. 12, § 35.) Sec tion 4019 now provides that “a term of four days will be deemed to have been served for every two days spent in actual custody.” (§ 4019, subd. (f).) The only defend ants who are excluded from section 4019’s current dayfor-day credit provisions are those who ha ve a current violent felony or murder conviction. (See § 2933.1, s ubd. (c), § 2933.2, subd. (c).) By its express terms, the amendment to section 4019 applies only to defendants whose crim es were committed on or after October 1, 2011 . (§ 4019, subd. (h).)
Defendant committed his cr imes on November 22, 2011. The parties agree the
amendments to section 4019 described above apply and that defendant is entitled to 14 days of conduct credit.
Defendant filed a letter motion to correct his presentence custody credits in the
trial court. The trial court denied his re quest based on its mistaken belief defendant sought a retroactive application of amended section 4019. We shall grant the requested relief.
DISPOSITION The judgment is amended to reflect an award to defendant of 29 days of presentence custody credit, comprised of 15 days of actual time a nd 14 days of conduct credit. As amended, the judgment is affirmed. The trial court is directed to prepare an

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.3 amended abstract of judgment and to forwar d it to the Department of Corrections and
Rehabilitation.

NICHOLSON , J.

We concur:

RAYE , P. J.

HULL , J.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Chief Executive
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 24, 2010



/s/  Kelcy L.
WarrenKelcy L. WarrenChief Executive Officer


*A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 4,      2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |                               |                                                |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | PAPERWEIGHT      DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                                    |                               |                                                |
| Dated:  November      6, 2009 |                               |                                                |
|                                    | Name:                              | Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                                    | Title:                             | Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:00 a.m. EST, Friday, February 9, 2024.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Enforcement and examination matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: January 31, 2024.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-02271 Filed 1-31-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Exhibit 13.1



Compañía de Minas Buenaventura
S.A.A.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



| | 1. | I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the “Company”).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | (A)       The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, as amended by Amendment No.
1 on Form 20-F/A, accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(B)       The information
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 16, 2016



/s/ Roque
Benavides Ganoza

Roque Benavides Ganoza

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael P. Gray, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 30, 2008



/s/ MICHAEL P. GRAYMichael P. GrayChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2036 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2036

 To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide equitable 
 treatment for barley producers so that 1996 contract payments to the 
    producers are not reduced to a greater extent than the average 
percentage reduction in contract payments for other commodities, while 
 maintaining the level of contract payments for other commodities, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

 Mr. Dorgan (for himself, Mr. Baucus, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. 
  Conrad, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Daschle) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to provide equitable 
 treatment for barley producers so that 1996 contract payments to the 
    producers are not reduced to a greater extent than the average 
percentage reduction in contract payments for other commodities, while 
 maintaining the level of contract payments for other commodities, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORRECTION OF BARLEY PAYMENT INEQUITY.

    Section 113 of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 
7213) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 
        (f) and (g), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Additional Barley Allocation.--In addition to the adjustments 
required under subsection (c), the amount allocated under subsection 
(b)(4) for barley contract payments shall be increased by $35,000,000 
for fiscal year 1996.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterlyreport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: May 13, 2008 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 5574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01824]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-24-005]


Sunshine Act Meetings

    Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: February 6, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-685 and 731-TA-1599-1601 and 
1603 (Final)(Tin Mill Products from Canada, China, Germany, and South 
Korea). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its 
determinations and views of the Commission on February 20, 2024.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory 
Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.
    The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, 
subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 
may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. Earlier 
notification of meeting was not possible.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 25, 2024.
Sharon Bellamy,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-01824 Filed 1-25-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
NUMBER S 13
- 1 3
- 00 5 25
- CV AND 13
- 14
- 00 335
- CV 

### COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

JUAN ANTONIO CORONAD O, FRANCISCO SOLIZ RAMI REZ, ROBERTO RIVERA III, RUBEN CONTRERAS , Appellant s ,

v. PETER ZAVALETTA, YOL ANDA DE LEON, FREEDOM COMMUNICATIO NS, INC. D/B/A THE BROWNSVILL E HERALD AND VALLEY MORNING S TAR , Appellee s
.

On a ppeal from the 357th District Court of Ca meron County, Texas.



### ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Order Per Curiam Appellants perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357 th Dist r i ct Court2

of Cameron County, Texas in cause number 2008

- 03

- 1636

- E

. This cause is presently before the Court on an unopposed “Motion to Dismiss the Appeal of Order Granting Peter Zavaletta’s Motion for Summary Judgment.” Appellants no longer wish to appeal the trial court’s ruling granting Peter Zavaletta’s motion for s ummary judgme nt and request dismissal of the appeal of the trial court order granting Peter Zavaletta’s motion for summary judgment. The appeal with respect to appellants and appellee Peter Zavaletta is hereby SEVERED from the remainder of the appeal and placed into ap pellate cause number 13

-
1 4

- 00 335

- CV styled Juan Antonio Coronado, Francisco Soliz Ramirez, Roberto Rivera
III, and Ruben Contreras v. Peter Zavaletta. The appeal with respect to appellants and appellees Yolanda De Leon and Freedom Communications, Inc. d/b/a The Brownsville Herald and Valley Morning Star remains docketed under the original cause number 13

- 13

- 00525

- CV.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed th is 17th day of July , 201 4

.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2106

To amend the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 to prohibit the

placement of members of the United States Armed Forces under the

command, direction, or control of the United Nations, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 20), 1996

Mr. MCCONNELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

A BILL

To amend the United Nations Participation Act of 1945

to prohibit the placement of members of the United

States Armed Forces under the command, direction, or

control of the United Nations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED NATIONS PAR4 TICIPATION ACT.

5 The United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (22

6 U.S.C. 287 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the

7 following:
2

•S 2106 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 10. INDEPENDENCE OF UNITED STATES ARMED

2 FORCES FROM UNITED NATIONS COMMAND.

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION ON SUBORDINATION TO UNITED

4 NATIONS COMMAND.—Unless specifically approved by

5 Congress by enactment of an Act or joint resolution, no

6 unit, command, organization, or member of the Armed

7 Forces of the United States shall be placed under the com8 mand, direction, or control of a foreign national who is

9 subject to the direction or control of, or who owes alle10 giance to, the United Nations Security Council, the United

11 Nations Secretary General, or any organization affiliated

12 with the United Nations.

13 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON PARTICIPATION IN AN INTER14 NATIONAL STANDING ARMED MILITARY FORCE.—Unless

15 specifically authorized by Congress by enactment of an Act

16 or joint resolution, members of the United States Armed

17 Forces shall not participate in an international standing

18 armed military force under the command and control of

19 the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations

20 Secretary General, or any organization affiliated with the

21 United Nations.

22 ‘‘(c) INSIGNIA.—

23 ‘‘(1) NO OBLIGATION TO WEAR.—No member of

24 the United States Armed Forces shall be required or

25 attempt to require another member of the United

26 States Armed Forces to wear a badge, symbol, hel-
3

•S 2106 IS

1 met, headgear, or other visible insignia which indi2 cates allegiance or affiliation to the United Nations

3 Security Council, the United Nations Secretary Gen4 eral, or any affiliated organization.

5 ‘‘(2) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in

6 this section prohibits the voluntary wearing of a for7 eign badge, symbol, helmet, headgear, or visible in8 signia if authorized by Congress or consistent with

9 regulations issued by the Secretary of Defense or by

10 the Secretary of the appropriate military depart11 ment.’’.

Æ
#### Don Meredith COTTEE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7742.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 10, 2003.

Don Meredith Cottee, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Don Meredith Cottee seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) and denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. RApp. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States*
      *676
      *v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).

The district court’s orders were entered on the docket on August 2, 2002 (dismissal of § 2254 petition) and September 25, 2002 (denial of R. 59(e) motion). The notice of appeal was filed on October 29, 2002.* Because Cottee failed to file a timely notice of appeal for either of these orders or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

Cottee's notice of appeal purports to appeal an order of the district court entered on October 29, 2002, the same day Cottee mailed the notice of appeal. The district court did not enter any order pertaining to Cottee’s case on October 29, 2002, therefore we will assume Cottee was attempting to appeal either the August 2, 2002 order or the September 25, 2002 order. For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).