alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31




CERTIFICATION




I, Joel
Gardner, President, CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Megola, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and




5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date: March
27, 2009


/s/ JOEL
      GARDNERJoel
      GardnerPresident, CEO, Principal FinancialOfficer
      and Principal Accounting
Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0379 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, vs. CLEONE BLUESKY SHAWL,

Defendant and Appellant .

**G RANT**  Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until November 13 , 2023 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court October 4 2023

10/04/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0379
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-04-00637-CR

Wayne Dymowski, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HAYS COUNTY

NO. 55,523, HONORABLE LINDA A. RODRIGUEZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Wayne Dymowski seeks to appeal the trial court’s order overruling of his “motion

for post-conviction relief.” By this motion, Dymowski asked the court to set aside his July 1999

misdemeanor conviction in Hays County cause number 55,523 on the ground that he was not

represented by counsel.

A final conviction may not be set aside on the motion of a party. Instead, habeas

corpus is the proper procedure by which to attack a final conviction in this State. See Tex. Code

Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.09 (West 1977); Ex parte Schmidt, 109 S.W.3d 480, 483 (Tex. Crim. App.

2003). Dymowski’s motion does not purport to be a petition for writ of habeas corpus. And if it

were to be construed as a habeas corpus petition, the trial court’s ruling is not appealable. See Ex

parte Gonzales, 12 S.W.3d 913, 914 (Tex. App.—Austin 2000, pet. ref’d).
2

Finding no basis for the appeal, we dismiss it for want of jurisdiction.

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: October 28, 2004

Do Not Publish
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                         PRECISION RESPONSE CORPORATION
                        STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION
                         OF PROFORMA PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                               ---------------------------------------------------
                                                                   1996                1995                1994
                                                                -----------         -----------         ------------

<S>                                                             <C>                 <C>                 <C>
Proforma net income (loss)                                      $     6,519         $       837         $       (286)
                                                                ===========         ===========         ============

Weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding:
   Actual shares                                                 18,013,115          16,400,000           16,400,000
   Additional shares required to
     replace the planned distribution
     to shareholders in excess of
     proforma earnings for the twelve
     months ended June 30, 1996                                      70,126             127,061                    -
                                                                -----------         -----------         ------------
                                                                 18,083,241          16,527,061           16,400,000
                                                                ===========         ===========         ============

Proforma net income (loss) per share
    of common stock                                             $      0.36         $      0.05         $      (0.02)
                                                                ===========         ===========         ============
</TABLE>
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal

revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA 02108

- 1750; (617) 557

- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us

SJC

- 1229 9

RAYMOND P. VINNIE vs

. SUPE RINTENDENT , MASSACHUSETTS

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, NORFOLK

.

March 21, 2018

.

Supreme Judicial Court , Superintendence of inferior courts.

In 1993, Raymond P. Vinnie was convicted o f murder in the first degree. After plenary review, w e affirmed the con viction
and the denial of his motion for a new trial. Commonwealth v. Vinnie , 428 Mass. 161 , cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1007 (1998) , overruled on another ground by Commonwealth v. Paulding , 438 Mass. 1 (2002) . In 2016, Vinnie filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to G. L. c. 248, § 1, in the county

court , arguing that he was unlawfully imprisoned pursuant to a
void mittimus . A single justice of this court transferred the petition to the Superior Court. A judge in that court denied
relief. Vinnie then filed a motion in the county court, seeking to reinstate his petition on the ground that the Superior Court judge made various procedural and substantive errors . The same single justice denied the motion without a hearing

. Vinnie appeals from that ruling.

The single justice properly denied Vinnie's motion to reinstate the petition. The Superior Court judge's decision denying habeas relief was reviewable in the ordinary appellate

process

. After habeas relief was denied in the Superior Court , Vinnie "could have obtained review by this court only if he was granted leave by a single justice pursuant to the gatekeeper provision of G. L. c. 278, § 33E . He cannot circumvent the gatekeeper provision by filing his petition in the county court
in th e first instance

. " Tyree v. Commonwealth , 449 Mass. 1034 , 1034 (2007) , cert. denied, 554 U.S. 926 (2008)

. There was no basis to "reinstate" the petition in the county court.Judgment affirmed

.

Raymond P. Vinnie , pro se. Eric A. Haskell , Assistant Attorney General, for the

respon dent

.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10639

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VICTOR HUGO MARROQUIN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-427-8

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hugo 

Marroquin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Marroquin has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 27, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10639 Document: 00513927358 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/27/2017
No. 16-10639

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10639 Document: 00513927358 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/27/2017
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-0221

Docket Number

2010-SW-082-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

- Nightsun XP Searchlight Safety and Service Bulletin #SL 0810-01, Amendment 

#2, dated September 24, 2010

- Nightsun XP Searchlight System Kit and Procedure to Incorporate EASA AD 

2010-0183 Conformance, 034374 Revision NC, approved September 28, 2010, 

steps 1 through 13

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
EXHIBIT 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, V. Bryan Lawlis, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Aradigm Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                    /s/ V. BRYAN LAWLIS   V. Bryan Lawlis   *President and Chief Executive Officer*   
Dated: March 30, 2005
#### Ex parte Junior Lee WILLIAMS.

No. 31808.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1960.

Thos. H. Dent, Galveston, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

This is an attempted appeal from an order entered by the Hon. G. P. Hardy, Jr., Judge of the District Court of Wharton County, Texas, denying appellant’s application for a writ of habeas corpus in which he *sought his*discharge from the penitentiary where he is being held awaiting execution under a death sentence.

The application having been denied and the writ refused; appellant has no right to an appeal to this court. Art. 119, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.; Ex parte grosser, 149 Tex.Cr.R. 319, 194 S.W.2d 89; Ex parte Hubbard, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 57, 225 S.W.2d 196 and Ex parte Cross, Tex.Cr.App., 288 S.W.2d 507.

The appeal is dismissed.

Treating the case as an original proceeding in this court under Art. 119, V.A.C.C.P., we find no merit in the application for writ of habeas corpus, and it is denied.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained.

Opinion approved by the Court.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-4, Registration No. 333-13253) as amended on December 11, 1996 and in the
related Prospectus of Pacific Gulf Properties Inc. related to its Offer to
Exchange up to all of its 8.375% Convertible Subordinated Debentures Due 2001
for shares of its Common Stock, of our reports: (a) dated February 9, 1996, with
respect to the consolidated and combined financial statements and related
financial statement schedule of Pacific Gulf Properties Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1995, (b) dated
April 30, 1996, with respect to the statement of revenues and certain expenses
of Tukwila Business Park included in its Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 7,
1996, (c) dated April 12, 1996, with respect to the combined statement of
revenues and certain expenses of the Konwiser Acquisition Properties included in
its Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 7, 1996, and (d) dated July 28, 1995,
with respect to the combined statement of revenues and certain expenses of the
Konwiser Acquisition Properties included in its Current Report on Form 8-K/A
dated May 7, 1996, all of which have been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
    
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Newport Beach, California
   
December 11, 1996
Exhibit 99





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PRSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the this quarterly report of MoliChem Medicines, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof, each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





| | 1. |  | This report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MoliChem Medicines,
Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Date:  November 14, 2002



By:

/s/    Luis MolinaLuis Molina, Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer/s/    Richard E. MartinRichard E. Martin Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 28, 2010



/s/    DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. PasseriPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




50
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 396 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 396

   For the relief of Amalia Hatzipetrou and Konstantinos Hatzipetrou.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 13 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Craig introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   For the relief of Amalia Hatzipetrou and Konstantinos Hatzipetrou.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    In the administration of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Amalia Hatzipetrou and Konstantinos Hatzipetrou 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Amalia Hatzipetrou and 
Konstantinos Hatzipetrou as provided in this Act, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one number during 
the current fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available 
to natives of the country of the alien's birth under subsections (a) 
and (b) of section 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1153).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.3

Statement

Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the
undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 1, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                               |  |                                                
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                         |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|                         |  |                              
|Dated: November 13, 2006 |  |                               |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                           
|                         |  | Name:                         |  | Mark R. Richards                               
|                         |  | Title:                        |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.