alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Az Európai Unió L 30/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0731 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | L 30 |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Jogszabályok | 63. évfolyam2020. február 3. |

ISSN 1977-0731

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

L 30

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Jogszabályok

63. évfolyam2020. február 3.

---

| Tartalom | | Helyesbítések | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Helyesbítés a Régiók Bizottságának a Szlovén Köztársaság által javasolt két tagja és három póttagja kinevezéséről szóló, 2019. október 24-i (EU) 2019/1815 tanácsi határozathoz ( HL L 278., 2019.10.30. ) | 1 |

Tartalom

Helyesbítések

Oldal

*

Helyesbítés a Régiók Bizottságának a Szlovén Köztársaság által javasolt két tagja és három póttagja kinevezéséről szóló, 2019. október 24-i (EU) 2019/1815 tanácsi határozathoz ( HL L 278., 2019.10.30. )

( HL L 278., 2019.10.30. )

1

| HU | Azok a jogi aktusok, amelyek címe normál szedéssel jelenik meg, a mezőgazdasági ügyek napi intézésére vonatkoznak, és rendszerint csak korlátozott ideig maradnak hatályban.
  Valamennyi más jogszabály címét vastagon szedik, és előtte csillag szerepel. |
| --- | --- |

HU

Azok a jogi aktusok, amelyek címe normál szedéssel jelenik meg, a mezőgazdasági ügyek napi intézésére vonatkoznak, és rendszerint csak korlátozott ideig maradnak hatályban.

Valamennyi más jogszabály címét vastagon szedik, és előtte csillag szerepel.

---

Helyesbítések

| 2020.2.3. | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | L 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2020.2.3.

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

L 30/1

---

Helyesbítés a Régiók Bizottságának a Szlovén Köztársaság által javasolt két tagja és három póttagja kinevezéséről szóló, 2019. október 24-i (EU) 2019/1815 tanácsi határozathoz

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja L 278., 2019. október 30.
  )

A 12. oldalon, az 1. cikkben, a b) pont első franciabekezdésében:

a következő szövegrész:

| „– | Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,” |
| --- | --- |

„–

Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”

helyesen:

| „– | Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,” |
| --- | --- |

„–

Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                               EXHIBIT 23.2



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-19651) of Precision Response Corporation (the "Company")
of our report dated March 17, 1995, on our audit of the December 31, 1994
financial statements of the Company and schedule thereto appearing in the
Company's Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.






/s/ GURLAND & GOLDBERG, P.A.


Hallandale, Florida
March 26, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 37 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 37

 To terminate the Extremely Low Frequency Communication System of the 
                                 Navy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

Mr. Feingold (for himself and Mr. Kohl) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To terminate the Extremely Low Frequency Communication System of the 
                                 Navy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Extremely Low Frequency 
Communication System Termination and Deficit Reduction Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF FURTHER FUNDING OF THE EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY 
              COMMUNICATION SYSTEM.

    (a) Prohibition on Use of Funds.--Except as provided in subsection 
(b), funds appropriated on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act to or for the use of the Department of Defense may not be obligated 
or expended for the Extremely Low Frequency Communication System of the 
Navy.
    (b) Limited Exception for Termination Costs.--Subsection (a) does 
not apply to expenditures solely for termination of the Extremely Low 
Frequency Communication System.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.58

                             SCHEDULE OF NHI LEASES
                  WHICH ARE SUBSTANTIALLY IN THE FORM OF LEASE
                            ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT 10.57


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             LEASING          ORIGINAL NHI
                FACILITY NAME           LOCATION                         COMMITMENT FEE        INVESTMENT        ANNUAL BASE RENT
                -------------           --------                         --------------        ----------        ----------------
<S>                                     <C>                              <C>                 <C>                 <C>         
Sterling House of Gilbert               845 N. El Dorado Dr.               $ 35,926.80       $ 3,592,680.00        $ 341,304.60
                                        Gilbert, AZ 85233

Clare Bridge of Glendale                6735 W. Hillcrest Blvd.              42,108.62         4,210,862.00          400,031.89
                                        Glendale, AZ 85310

Sterling House of Tuscon (West)         2650 W. Ina Road                     33,566.17         3,356,617.00          318,878.61
                                        Tuscon, AZ 85741

Sterling Cottage of Daytona Beach       570 National Healthcare Blvd.        29,886.15         2,988,615.00          283,918.42
                                        Daytona Beach, FL 32114

Clare Bridge of Maitland                760 N. Wymore Road                  113,372.54        11,337,254.00        1,077,039.10*
Wynwood of Maitland                     Maitland, FL 32751

Sterling House of Conway                872 Singleton Ridge Road             32,206.37         3,220,637.00           305,960.51
                                        Conway, SC 29526

Sterling House of Kingsport             2424 N. John B. Dennis Hwy.          29,217.36         2,921,736.00           277,564.92
                                        Kingsport, TN 37660
</TABLE>

* Clare Bridge of Maitland - $418,976.03; Wynwood of Maitland - $658,063.10.
Attachment 1

Bottom Ash Handling Diagram
Attachment 1. Diagram of Tank-Based Bottom Ash System at Homer City

Dewatering Bins

Settling Tank Surge Tank

Clearwell

Bottom Ash Transport 

Water

Solids to Landfill

Solids

Solids

Solids

Dewatering Bin 

Overflow and Decant

Recycled within 

Bottom Ash 

System or Used to 

Moisten Fly Ash

Settling Tank Surge Tank
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
      ( print page 7726)    
*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Translational and Brain Devices Panel.                    

*Date:*                         February 21, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         M. Catherine Bennett, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH/HHS NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-435-1766,                         *bennettc3@csr.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: January 31, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-02219 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILTO FENESCAT,

Petitioner,

 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent.

No. 20-72643

Agency No. A209-865-222

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 8, 2022** 

Seattle, Washington

Before: GILMAN,*** IKUTA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

 

Wilto Fenescat seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (BIA) denying his motion to reopen his removal proceedings and to

FILED

JUN 16 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Ronald Lee Gilman, United States Circuit Judge for

the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
reconsider the BIA’s previous decision denying his administrative appeal. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Fenescat’s motion to reopen

(filed almost two years after the generally applicable deadline) as untimely. See 8

U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i). Fenescat failed to show that he qualified for an

exception to the applicable deadline for changed country conditions, see id.

§ 1229a(c)(7)(C)(ii), because Fenescat’s change in personal circumstances, namely

his marriage, did not constitute a change in country conditions, see Rodriguez v.

Garland, 990 F.3d 1205, 1209–10 (9th Cir. 2021); see also Chandra v. Holder,

751 F.3d 1034, 1037 (9th Cir. 2014). Further, Fenescat did not present any

evidence of country conditions in Haiti to the BIA.1

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Fenescat’s motion to

reconsider the prior adverse credibility determination. The BIA denied the motion

because it was untimely and, in the alternative, because it raised only arguments

that the BIA had considered and rejected in its previous decision. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(b)(1)–(2). Because Fenescat does not challenge either of these

1

 Because the BIA did not err in denying the motion to reopen as untimely,

we do not address Fenescat’s arguments concerning the BIA’s alternative

reasoning that Fenescat failed to establish prima facie eligibility for relief as a

derivative beneficiary of his wife’s asylum application. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840

F.3d 575, 583 (9th Cir. 2016).

2
dispositive grounds for denying the motion, we do not consider his remaining

arguments. Finally, because the BIA did not rely on the IJ’s adverse credibility

determination in reaching its conclusion, Matter of F-S-N-, 28 I. & N. Dec. 1 (BIA

2020), is not applicable, and we therefore reject Fenescat’s argument that the

BIA’s decision was contrary to that decision.

PETITION DENIED.

3
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m(a) or Section 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: September 17, 2008
    /s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderPresident and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 IMPRESO, INC. CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Susan M. Atkins, Chief Financial Officer of IMPRESO, INC.
(the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
February 29, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and  2.
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.  3.
    
    Item 4 Controls and Procedures in the Companys Form 10-Q is
incorporated herein by reference. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 14th day of April, 2004. /s/ Susan M. AtkinsSusan M. Atkins
Name: Chief Financial Officer
Title: *A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     11,572,431
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 11,572,431
<CASH>                                         548,317
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,139,776
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                9,875
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                869,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       183,620
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,448,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,139,776
<PREMIUMS>                                     238,226
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            43,860
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 589
<BENEFITS>                                     45,709
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           107,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,075)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (11,903)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,172)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,172)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 (13,373)
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            45,709
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             49,207
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                9,875
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         505,014
<SECURITIES>                                 2,753,652
<RECEIVABLES>                                  513,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,815,964
<PP&E>                                         125,917
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,593,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,527,286
<BONDS>                                        347,884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           714
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,311,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,593,234
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,485,427
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,937,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,792
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                487,321
<INCOME-TAX>                                   190,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            297,211
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,891
<CHANGES>                                     (20,558)
<NET-INCOME>                                   278,544
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.10


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                              Consent of KPMG LLP

<PAGE>

                              Consent of KPMG LLP
                              -------------------

The Board of Directors
ICG Communications, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No.
33-96660 on Form S-3 of IntelCom Group, Inc., No. 333-08729 on Form S-3 of
Holdings (Canada) Co., and Nos. 333-40495 and 333-45213 and 333-56835 on Form
S-8 of ICG Communications, Inc. of our reports dated February 16, 2000, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of ICG Communications, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, and the related financial
statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 1999 Annual Report
on Form 10-K of ICG's Communications, Inc.



                                      /s/ KPMG LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 29, 2000
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40358 Summary Calendar

KATHY A. DRAPER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-98-CV-321

- - - - - - - - - - January 19, 2001 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Kathy A. Draper appeals the district court’s summary judgment affirming the determination by the Commissioner of Social Security that she is not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Draper argues that the administrative law judge (ALJ) failed to give appropriate weight to her treatment for depression. Draper points to the reports of Dr. Feltoon, a psychologist who believed she was suffering from a depressive disorder, and the reports of Marylou Goranson, the licensed counselor who diagnosed Draper with an adjustmentNo. 00-40358 -2- disorder with mixed emotional features of depression, anxiety, and anger. However, none of the physicians who treated or evaluated Draper determined that her depressive condition would significantly hinder her ability to perform light work. The opinions of the physicians provide substantial evidence to support the Commissioner’s decision. Draper’s argument that the ALJ made an erroneous residual functional capacity assessment because she failed to consider’s Draper’s depression and the side effects of medication is similarly without merit. Draper’s testimony indicated that she did not frequently take the medications that caused side effects, and those side effects were not of enough significance to prevent her taking a job and performing light work. The ALJ’s assessment of Draper’s credibility is also supported by substantial evidence. Draper argues that the ALJ placed inappropriate weight on her activities of daily living and personal observations at the hearing. However, Draper’s testimony revealed that she performed enough household chores and errands to support the conclusion that light work would not be impossible for her. It is within the province of the ALJ to make credibility determinations concerning testimony at administrative hearings. See Newton v. Apfel , 209 F.3d 448, 458 (5th Cir. 2000); Greenspan v. Shalala , 38 F.3d 232, 237 (5th Cir. 1994). Draper’s argument that the ALJ erred in propounding an inadequate hypothetical question to the vocational expert that failed to take into consideration her limitations is without merit because the ALJ included in the hypothetical question all limitations supported by the reports from physicians.No. 00-40358 -3-

AFFIRMED.