Interim Decision #1762

Mamma or You

### No*

In Visa Petition Proceedings

A-12788962



### Decided by Board July 98, 1967

Since the relationship or stepmother-stepchild within the ambit of Natioia v. Esperdy, 239 F. Supp. 531, is created upon the marriage of the father of the illegitimate child to the stepmother subsequent to the birth of the child, the relationship of stepmother-stepchild does not exist for immigration purposes between petitioner, a law= permanent resident, and beneficiary

-, the Illegitimate child of her prior husband, which child was born as the result of an extramarital relationship during the existence of their marriage.

Ox BZILOW or Tun Pwrrrornm: Ox BrATALV or SnarloIC: Jack Wasserman, Esquire Irving A. Appleman 902 Warner Building Appellate Trial Attorney Washington, D.C. 20004

The case comes forward on appeal from the order of the District Director, New York District, dated May 8, 1967 denying the visa petition 

### for the reason that the beneficiary, the alleged stepdaughter, isnot a "child" as defined in section 101(s) (1) (B) or (D) of the Immigration and Nationality Act in that she is not a legitimate child, 

### since petitioner's husband was never married to her mother or otherwise legitimated her in accordance with the terms of section 101(b) (1) (C) of the Act; furthermore, the case is distinguishable from the
decision in Nation, v. Esperdy, 239 F. Supp. 531 (1965). The petitioner, a 52-year-old female, a native of Hong Kong, B.C.C., a British subject, and a lawful permanent resident of the United States since January 

### 21, 1962, seeks preference quota status on behalf of the beneficiary as her stepchild. The beneficiary is a native of HongKong, B.C.C., a British subject, 10 years old. The visa petition indicates that the petitioner was married on November 15, 1935 at Nan 

### Chung Village, N.T., Hong Kong. A birth certificate of the beneficiary shows that her birth was registered under the name of Tsui Ling,

•See also Matter of Young, Int. Dec. No. 1819, of which the alien beneficiary
in this case Is also the subject.

310Interim Decision #1762



### her father being listed as Young Wan Twig and her mother being described as Yau Boon Tai. Sworn statements were taken from the petitioner and her husband, 

### Young Wan Twig, by an immigration officer on April 13, 1967. When questioned regarding the birth certificate of the beneficiary, she stated

### that the midwife advised her to use the name of herself and her husband as parents instead of the name of the natural mother of the child, who was a servant in her household. The petitioner stated that the servant had told her that her husband was the father of this child. She stated that the child was born and remained in her household where the natural mother of the child continued to be employed as a servant, that she bottle fed the baby and that the child's natural
mother took 

### care of the child but not enough. The petitioner stated 

### that at the time the child was born, her husband was in the United States, that she informed him of the birth of the child and that he sent money for the support of the child but that she had 

### no receipts. The petitioner left Hong Kong for the United States in 1962 when thebeneficiary was about five years old. The beneficiary continued to reside in the petitioner's house with her natural mother, the petitioner's daughter-in-law and her grandchildren, and 

### was cared for by her natural mother. The petitioner's husband continued to send financial support for the child as well 

### as for the daughter-in-law and the grandchildren. The sworn statement of the petitioner's husband confirms that they were married in 1985, that he left for the United States in 1987 and that he visited his wife in Hong Kong in 1945 when he was a member 

### of the United States Army, visited her again in 1946 and 1949 and last visited her from February 1956 until December 1956. He admitted that he engaged in sexual relations with the servant girl during all his visits to Hong Kong and 

### that they engaged in relations about 10 or 15 times. He admitted, however, that he had told an investigator in connection with an attempt to bring in the beneficiary as an orphan that he had intercourse with the servant girl only once. However, he now states it may have been more than once but he did not exactly remember and that the servant girl is now about 48 years old. The 

### husband stated that the only way he has of knowing that he is the child's father is that the servant girl told his wife that he was the father and that 'he knows he had engaged in sexual intercourse with her; that in 1956 when he left 

### Hong Kong she appeared to 

### be pregnant; that he discussed this with 

### her and she told him that she was pregnantand it was his child. He believed her because of the circumstances involved and said that he is willing to undergo blood tests to 'determine compatibility. He stated that he supported the child but that he has

341Interim Decision #1762

never seen the child. The husband did not consider the servant girl, Tong Kai, to be a concubine and declared that the beneficiary was his illegitimate child. 

### Counsel places reliance upon the case of Nation v. Esperdy, 239 F.Supp. 531 (S.D.N.Y. 1965), to support his contention that the beneficiary is the stepchild of the female petitioner. The Nation case involved 

### a child who was born out of wedlock on February 12, 1947, was abandoned in infancy by his natural mother, he was 

### cared for by the plaintiff since 1949. The plaintiff married the beneficiary's natural 

### father in 1952 when the beneficiary was five years old. The court found that the legislative history of the Act of 1957, which amended section 101 (b) 

### (1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act so as to

include in subparagraph (B) a stepchild, Icaether or not born, out of wedlock, provided the child had not reached the age of 18 years at the time the marriage creating the status of stepchild occurred, while tending to sustain the Government's position that it applied only to the illegitimate child of a mother who subsequently married a United States citizen, nevertheless was not sufficiently compelling to control the interpretation of subparagraph (B). The court observed that the plaintiff, her husband and the beneficiary had been a dime family unit since shortly after the beneficiary's birth, that immediately after citizenship was secured, the plaintiff petitioned to unite the family unit. The court applied the "plain meaning" rule to the phrase "whether or not born

,out of wedlock" in view of the clearly expressed legislative intention to keep together the family unit whenever possible and held that on the facts of the case, in view of the existence of a family unit, the beneficiary was the plaintiff's stepchild. There are important differences between the present case and the
Nation case. In the Nation case, the factual situation was that the child was born out of wedlock, and the natural father married the stepmother when the child was five years old. The court at pages 533-534 stated that although accepted dictionaries define stepchild as a childby a former marriage, this statute literally contemplates that for immigration purposes, 

### a person may be a stepchild even though he is illegitimate and that neither the accepted dictionary definitions nor the statute makes any distinction between father and mother in defining a stepchild. These words of the court must be taken in the factual context in which they were uttered, a case where the step-relationship occurred upon the subsequent marriage of the father of the illegitimate c

### hild to the stepmother, thus creating the step

-relationship by such subsequent marriage. In the instant case,, there is no subsequent marriage, the petitioner being the wife of the husband, the child being The illegitimate child of

342

### Interim Decision #1782

th petitioner's husband, born as a result of illicit intercourse occurring during the marriage. Upon these facts, it is difficult to perceive how the petitioner qualifies as a stepmother merely by virtue of the fact that the beneficiary and her natural mother continued to reside in the household where the natural mother was a servant . 1 In addition, the petitioner's husband has never even seen the child. It is obvious that there was not in existence a family 

### unit which was 

### such a strong factor in influencing the decision in Nation v. Esperdy, 

### 289 F. Supp. 531. Assuming

### the petitioner's husband was the father of the child, in addition to the father never having seen the child, the child was raised by the natural mother who resided in the petitioner'shousehold, the petitioner assisting merely in occasionally bottlefeeding the child. The present case cannot be compared with the situation in Nation v. Esperdy 

### or in Matter of The, 

### Int. Dec. No. 1541, which was considered

a situation analogous to the Nation case. The circumstances of the case fall 

### within the principle of the holdings in Matter of Aleo, 

### Int. Dec. No. 1542; Matter of Morris, 

### Int. Dec. No. 1568; Matter of Green, 

### Int. Dec. No. 1570; and Matter of Sobers, 

### Int. Dec. No. 1590. These latter casesapply even more strongly because it does not appear under the factual situation presented herein that there is any claim to a stepmotherstepchild relationship based upon an illegitimate child born to thepetitioner's husband during the existence of the marriage of the petitioner and her husband. ORDER: It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

1Cf., Matter of Green, Int. Dec. No. 1570 (October 29. 1965).



### 343