alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2100 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 626
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2100

 To provide for the extension of certain authority for the Marshal of 
            the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 1996

 Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                           September 24, 1996

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the extension of certain authority for the Marshal of 
            the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION. 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    Section 9(c) of the Act entitled ``An Act relating to the policing 
of the building and grounds of the Supreme Court of the United 
States'', approved August 18, 1949 (40 U.S.C. 13n(c)) is amended in the 
first sentence by striking ``1996'' and inserting ``2000''.

                                                       Calendar No. 626

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2100

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To provide for the extension of certain authority for the Marshal of 
            the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 24, 1996

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 461 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 96
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 461

                          [Report No. 104-73]

      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 22, 1995

  Mr. Gorton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

               April 27 (legislative day, April 24), 1995

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
the time limitation of section 13 of the Federal Power Act, the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC 
Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of section 13 and the 
Commission's procedures under such section, to extend until May 31, 
2001, the time required for the licensee to commence the construction 
of such project. This section shall take effect for the project upon 
the expiration of the extension (issued by the Commission under section 
13) of the period required for commencement of construction of such 
project. If the license for FERC Project 3701 should expire prior to 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission is authorized and 
directed to reinstate effective June 1, 1995, the license previously 
issued for such project, to extend until May 31, 2001, the time 
required for the licensee to commence the construction of such project.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 96

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 461

                          [Report No. 104-73]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

      To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued 
                         hydroelectric license.

_______________________________________________________________________

               April 27 (legislative day, April 24), 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SYLAS ROJELIO SWASKEE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No s

. 4D 16

- 4072 and 4D 17

- 769

[ May 17, 2018 ]

Consolidated appeal s from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 20151387 CF10A, 14

- 13865 CF10A, and 15

- 973 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public Defender, West Pa lm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

D AMOORGIAN
, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael P. Gray, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 6, 2010



/S/    MICHAEL P.
GRAYMichael P. Gray
Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




47
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50543-50544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-20452]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Third Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance, (Joint With EUROCAE WG-85)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance, (Joint with EUROCAE WG-85).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
third meeting of RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of Navigation 
Performance, (Joint with EUROCAE WG-85).

DATES: The meeting will be held September 17-21, 2012, from 9:00 a.m.-
5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at EUROCONTROL Headquarters, Rue de 
la Fusee 96. 1130 Brussels, Belgium.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 227. The agenda will 
include the following:

September 17-21, 2012

 Welcome/Introduction/Administrative Remarks
 Agenda Overview
 Review Minutes and Action Items
     Update/Approve Minutes
 Review of Planned Work Program for the Week, with Plenary 
Break-out Sessions
 Review/Discussion of MASPS Action Items and Proposed Updates
 Other Business
 Establish Agenda for Next Meeting
 Date, Place, and Time of Next Meeting
 Plenary Adjourns

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral

[[Page 50544]]

statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present statements or 
obtain information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 14, 2012.
David Sicard,
Manager, Business Operations Group, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-20452 Filed 8-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7292

WILLIE JUNIOR HINES, a/k/a Willie Hines, Jr.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden of Perry

Correctional Institution; HENRY MCMASTER,

Attorney General of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (6:06-cv-01530-GRA)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 8, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Junior Hines, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*In June 2006, prior to Hines’ timely appeal in this case,

Hines filed a motion for authorization to file a second or

successive § 2254 petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000).

Hines raised the same issues presented in his second § 2254

petition. This Court denied authorization. See In re Hines, No.

06-461 (4th Cir. July 11, 2006) (unpublished order).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Willie Junior Hines seeks to appeal the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to treat

Hines’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as successive and dismiss

the petition without prejudice on that basis.* The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Hines has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
- 3 -

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended July 2, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 16, 2006 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 369 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 162
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 369

                          [Report No. 104-419]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 1995

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

            December 18 (legislative day, December 15), 1995

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To designate the Federal Courthouse in Decatur, Alabama, as the 
   ``Seybourn H. Lynne Federal Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal Courthouse in Decatur, Alabama, is designated as the 
``Seybourn H. Lynne Federal Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. LEGAL REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, document, record, map, or 
other paper of the United States to the building referred to in section 
1 is deemed to be a reference to the Seybourn H. Lynne Federal 
Courthouse.

            Passed the Senate August 9 (legislative day, July 10), 
      1995.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
                                     

                                                 House Calendar No. 162

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 369

                          [Report No. 104-419]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To designate the Federal Courthouse in Decatur, Alabama, as the 
   ``Seybourn H. Lynne Federal Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 18 (legislative day, December 15), 1995

            Referred to the House and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Federal Register: January 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 2)]
[Notices]               
[Page 504]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05ja10-158]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6859]

 
In the Matter of the Review of the Designation of Kahane Chai 
(aka American Friends of the United Yeshiva Movement aka American 
Friends of Yeshivat Rav Meir aka Committee for the Safety of the Roads 
aka Dikuy Bogdim aka DOV aka Forefront of the Idea aka Friends of the 
Jewish Idea Yeshiva aka Jewish Legion aka Judea Police aka Judean 
Congress aka Kach aka Kahane aka Kahane Lives aka Kahane Tzadak aka 
Kahane.org aka Kahanetzadak.com aka Kfar Tapuah Fund aka KOACH aka 
Meir's Youth aka New Kach Movement aka newkach.org aka No'ar Meir aka 
Repression of Traitors aka State of Judea aka Sword of David aka The 
Committee Against Racism and Discrimination (CARD) aka The Hatikva 
Jewish Identity Center aka The International Kahane Movement aka The 
Jewish Idea Yeshiva aka The Judean Legion aka The Judean Voice aka The 
Qomemiyut Movement aka The Rabbi Meir David Kahane Memorial Fund aka 
The Voice of Judea aka The Way of the Torah aka The Yeshiva of the 
Jewish Idea aka Yeshivat HaRav Meir) As a Foreign Terrorist 
Organization pursuant to Section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act, as amended

    Based upon a review of the Administrative Record assembled in these 
matters pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C)) (``INA''), and in 
consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary of the 
Treasury, I conclude that the circumstances that were the basis for the 
2004 re-designation of the aforementioned organization as foreign 
terrorist organization have not changed in such a manner as to warrant 
revocation of the designation and that the national security of the 
United States does not warrant a revocation of the designation.
    Therefore, I hereby determine that the designation of the 
aforementioned organization as foreign terrorist organizations, 
pursuant to Section 219 of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be 
maintained.
    This determination shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: December 22, 2009.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9-31305 Filed 1-4-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 532 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 532

     To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 10 (legislative day, March 6), 1995

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To clarify the rules governing venue, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VENUE.

    Paragraph (3) of section 1391(a) of title 28, United States Code, 
is amended by striking ``the defendants are'' and inserting ``any 
defendant is''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 No. 333-37803 and No. 333-67039) of Homestead Village Incorporated
and in the related Prospectus and the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.
333-17243, 333-17245 and 333-48163) pertaining to the Homestead Village
Incorporated 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Homestead Village Incorporated
1996 Outside Directors Plan and the Homestead Village Incorporated 401(K)
Savings Plan of our report dated February 24, 1997, with respect to the
financial statements of Homestead Village Incorporated for the year ended
December 31, 1996 included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 1998.
 
                                          Ernst & Young llp
 
March 24, 1999
Dallas, Texas
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

September 13, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00226

- CR

Jose Trinidad GONZALEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CR0458 The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

When we granted court reporter David Zarate ’s first motion for extension of time to file the reporter’s record, we set the record due on August 28

, 201 9

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. R. 35.3(c).
After t he extended due date, the court reporter filed a second request for an extension of time to
file the record until October 11

, 201 9

. The reporter’s request is GRANTED IN PART . The reporter’s record must be filed with this court by September 27 , 201 9

. See i d. (limiting any extension in an ordinary appeal to thirty days).

If the court reporter is unable to file the completed record by September 27 , 2019 , any further request for additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written
status report.
The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of pages edited, pro ofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks).

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond the requested date.

The preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached._________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of September, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
* The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2612

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Gary Bernard Cain, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 13, 2006 Filed: February 17, 2006

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Gary Bernard Cain pleaded guilty to three counts of bank robbery. At the plea hearing, Cain agreed he was a career offe nder based on his criminal history, and his resulting sentencing guidelines range was 168- 210 months. After the district court rejected his objections to the presentence report at sentencing, Cain agreed the 168- 210 range was correct. The district court * sentenced Cain at the bottom of the advisory guidelines range to 168 months in prison and three years of supervised release. Cain appeals arguing his post-Booker sentence is unreasonably long and the-2- district court failed to cite sentencing f actors contained in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Cain has not overcome the presumption that hi s sentence within the advisory guidelines range is reasonable. See United States v. Lincoln , 413 F.3d 716, 717-18 (8 thCir. 2005). The district court properly consider ed the guidelines range and applied the other factors in § 3553(a), including the natu re, seriousness, and circumstances of the offense, Cain’s criminal history and char acteristics, and the need to promote respect for the law, provide just punishment, and de ter criminal conduct. The district court was not required to enumerate each factor listed in § 3553(a). United States v. Lamoreaux , 422 F.3d 750, 756 (8 thCir. 2005). The court also stated reasons why the factors supported a sentence of 168 months. Considering the record as a whole, we cannot say the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence. A ccordingly, we affirm.

______________________________