alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2074

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes and the tax on generationskipping transfers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 1996

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes and the tax

on generation-skipping transfers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Estate and Gift Taxes

5 Repeal Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds the following:

8 (1) The Federal estate and gift tax structure is

9 an unfair and inefficient revenue source. Such taxes

10 represent a multiple tax on earnings. After paying
2

•S 2074 IS

1 income taxes, capital gains taxes, and property

2 taxes, lifetime savings are finally subjected to estate

3 taxes at rates that are generally higher than income

4 tax rates.

5 (2) Owners of family-owned businesses and

6 farms are among those who suffer the greatest im7 pact of such taxes. Many businesses fail after the

8 death of the founder because of estate taxes. Fami9 lies faced with these taxes are often forced to liq10 uidate farms or businesses to pay estate taxes. In

11 the process, jobs and financial security for family

12 members and employees are destroyed.

13 (3) The estate tax results in inefficiency in the

14 economy because of ‘‘estate planning’’ and other tax

15 avoidance mechanisms.

16 (4) Estate and gift taxes have a negative im17 pact on economic growth. Such taxes foster spending

18 and consumption, rather than savings and invest19 ment. Repeal of these taxes would result in in20 creased capital formation, additional jobs, and a

21 higher gross domestic product. Increased economic

22 activity and investments would also result in addi23 tional personal and corporate income tax revenues.

24 (5) Estate and gift taxes are a minor revenue

25 source for the Federal Government. In fiscal year
3

•S 2074 IS

1 1995, estate and gift taxes accounted for only 1 per2 cent of total Federal receipts. Furthermore, the Gov3 ernment spends billions of dollars each year for ad4 ministrative and compliance costs for these taxes.

5 (6) The repeal of Federal estate and gift taxes

6 is consistent with and will be a major step toward

7 establishing a tax code based on fairness, simplicity,

8 neutrality, visibility, and stability.

9 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF FEDERAL TRANSFER TAXES.

10 (a) GENERAL RULE.—Subtitle B of the Internal Rev11 enue Code of 1986 is hereby repealed.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub13 section (a) shall apply to the estates of decedents dying,

14 and gifts and generation-skipping transfers made, after

15 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 5, 2009      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                      |                                                |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                                | APPLETON      PAPERS INC. |
|                                |                      |                                                |
| Dated:  May      13, 2009 |                      |                                                |
|                                | Name:                     | Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                                | Title:                    | Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,865
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,865)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2158

To set the time for counting electoral votes

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1996

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read

the third time, and passed

A BILL

To set the time for counting electoral votes

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That in carrying out the procedure set forth in section

4 15 of title 3, United States Code, for 1997, ‘‘the 9th day

5 of January’’ shall be substituted for ‘‘the sixth day of Jan6 uary’’ in the first sentence of such section.

Æ
|   | (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                 |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      John      daCosta                                                           |   |   |   |   |
| John      daCostaChief      Financial OfficerDate:  November 13,      2009 |   |   |   |   |
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

-----------------------------------* 

Application of * 

Pentastar Aviation Charter Inc. *DOT Docket: DOT-OST-2014-0004 

for authority to conduct scheduled passenger operations as a 

commuter air carrier under 49 U.S.C. 41738 

* 

* ----- * 

MOTION OF 

Pentastar Aviation Charter, Inc 

TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

December 17.,2013 

JE Murdock Ill 

5034 Nebraska Ave.,NW 

Washington, DC 20008 

202-333-5986 

Sandy_ m urdock@ya hoo.com 

Notice: Any person who wishes to support or oppose this application must file an answer by [7 days 

after receipt of the application by the Department of Transportation] and serve that answer on all 

persons served with this filing. 
Application of 

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

-----------* 

* 

Pentastar Aviation Charter Inc. *DOT Docket: DOT-OST-2014-0004 

for authority to conduct scheduled passenger operations as a 

Commuter Air Carrier under 49 U.S.C. 41738 

* 

* --------------- * 

MOTION OF PENTASTAR AVIATION CHARTER INC 

TO WITHHOLD INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE 

Pursuant to section 302.12 of the Department's Rules of Practice, PENTASTAR AVIATION 

CHARTER INC (PACt) hereby moves to withhold from public-ATTACHMENT K page 20, 

which shows the income statement for the first two quarters of 2013.These documents 

are being filed with this Motion in a sealed envelope marked "Confidential Materials - Rule 12 

Treatment Requested." 

In support of this Motion, PACt submits the following: 

The last two quarters of results are extraordinarily sensitive commercial, financial data which 

PACt's competitors could use to bid against the applicant for other public charters and/or 

possible scheduled service markets. Disclosure would harm PACI's ability to compete 

effectively and create an undue advantage through this application process. Moreover, the 

information in this exhibit is highly detailed and would not otherwise be made accessible to 

persons outside the company. 

Therefore, this information should be afforded confidential treatment by the Department under 

Rule 12. 

Submitted by, 

JE Murdock Ill 

Outside Counsel for PACI 

Attachments
Exhibit 10.129



Amended Schedule of Mortgages and Deeds of Trust Which are Substantially in the Form of
Heller Mortgage/Deed of Trust Attached as Exhibit 10.2 
to the Registrant's Form 10-Q for the Period Ending 9/30/00



|RESIDENCE                                       | LOCATION                                                           | DATE OF MORTGAGE
|----------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------
|1.  Alterra Clare Bridge of Corona              | 2005 Kellogg Avenue
Corona, CA  92879-3111
San Bernadino County    | August 28, 2000 
|2. Alterra Clare Bridge of Leawood              | 12724 State Line Road
Leawood, KS  66221
Johnson County            | August 28, 2000 
|3. Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of Topeka       | 5800 SW Drury Lane
Topeka, KS  66604-2262
Shawnee County           | August 28, 2000 
|4. Alterra Clare Bridge of West Melbourne       | 7119 Greensboro Drive
West Melbourne, FL  32904
Brevard County     | August 28, 2000 
|5. Alterra Clare Bridge of Kenosha              | 10108 74th Street
Kenosha, WI
Kenosha County                       | August 28, 2000 
|6. Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of Winter Haven | 6120 Cypress Gardens Blvd
Winter Haven, FL  33884-3180
Polk County | August 28, 2000 
|7. Alterra Sterling House of Winter Haven       | 6110 Cypress Gardens Blvd
Winter Haven, FL  33884-3180
Polk County | August 28, 2000 
|8. Alterra Clare Bridge of Fort Wayne-Dupont    | 1716 East Dupont Road
Fort Wayne, IN
Allen County                  | August 28, 2000 
|9. Alterra Clare Bridge of Irving Valley Ranch  | 8855 Valley Ranch Parkway
Irving, TX  75063
Dallas County          | August 28, 2000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

JASON R. CRADDOCK; DAVID J.

LYTLE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. No. 96-1910

THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PRINCE

WILLIAM COUNTY, VIRGINIA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge.

(CA-96-628-A)

Submitted: February 25, 1997

Decided: April 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Jason R. Craddock, David J. Lytle, Appellants Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Jason R. Craddock and David J. Lytle appeal the district court's

dismissal of their complaint as frivolous. Because the district court

was without subject matter jurisdiction to consider this action, we

affirm.

In 1992 Craddock and Lytle were convicted in the Circuit Court of

Prince William County, Virginia, of trespassing at an abortion clinic.

They were fined $2500 each. In May 1996, they filed the instant

action, asserting that the trial judge erred in limiting evidence at trial.

Craddock and Lytle contended that the court's rulings deprived them

of their right to mount an effective defense. They sought declaratory

relief, dismissal of their criminal case and vacatur of the fines, or

remand for a new trial. Additionally, they moved for injunctive relief

to prevent the court from collecting the fines. The district court dismissed the action with prejudice upon a frivolity determination.

Federal district courts and courts of appeals have no jurisdiction to

review a final judgment of a state court that has acted in its judicial

capacity. Such jurisdiction lies only with the United States Supreme

Court. District of Columbia Court App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462,

482 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415-16

(1923). In the subject case, Craddock and Lytle attempted to obtain

review of a state court judgment in federal district court by framing

their claim as a violation of the Constitution. Such an attempt flies in

the face of Feldman.*

Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the

claims, we affirm the dismissal of this action as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

_________________________________________________________________

*The record does not suggest that Craddock or Lytle are, or ever have

been, in custody; therefore, this action does not sound in habeas corpus.

See 28 U.S.C. § 2254, amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214; Wright v.

Bailey, 544 F.2d 737, 740 (4th Cir. 1976).

 2
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 3
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sports Information & Publishing Corp.
("the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
John Fuller, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

            (1) the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ John Fuller
-----------------------------
John Fuller
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: August 23, 2004
Telephone log

Date: Tuesday, March 09, 2010

Call from: Matt Kevnick and Julie He, Toyota

734-995-0540

Call to: Margaret Sheppard, EPA/SPD

Matt Kevnick and Julie He had three questions related to HFO-1234yf:

1) Would EPA like a meeting to ask questions about Toyota’s public comment with 

information on hybrid vehicles? Response: Not necessary. The information was 

clear enough.

2) Who should they talk to with a question related to the Significant New Use Rule? 

Response: Karen Chu.

3) What is the timing of the final SNAP rule for HFO-1234yf? Response: Later this 

year—interagency review will be required.
| 1.  | I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the “Company”). |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | (A)           The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /S/ ROQUE BENAVIDES GANOZA |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Roque Benavides Ganoza     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer    |

----
II

Calendar No. 75

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 441

[Report No. 104–53]

To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian Child

Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 16 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. DOMENICI) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

APRIL 18, 1995

Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of April 6 (legislative

day, April 5), 1995, by Mr. MCCAIN, without amendment

A BILL

To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under

the Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS.

4 Sections 409(e), 410(h), and 411(i) of the Indian Child

5 Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act (25 U.S.C.
2

•S 441 RS

1 3208(e), 3209(h), and 3210(i), respectively) are each

2 amended by striking ‘‘and 1995’’ and inserting ‘‘1995,

3 1996, and 1997’’.

Calendar No. 75

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 441

[Report No. 104–53]

A BILL

To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs

Violence Prevention Act, and for other purposes.under the Indian Child Protection and Family

APRIL 18, 1995

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR


RULE 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of New Green Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterr ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George Ring Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;


and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 19, 2010
By:
/s/  George RingGeorge RingChief Executive Officer and Acting PrincipalFinancial Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00132-CV

JANE DOE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

NEXT FRIEND OF JOHN DOE, A 

MINOR, Appellant

V.

HURST-EULESS-BEDFORD 

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 17th District Court

of Tarrant County (017-313745-19)

January 21, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s order. We affirm the trial court’s order 

granting the plea to the jurisdiction. 

It is further ordered that appellant Jane Doe, Individually and as Next Friend 

of John Doe, A Minor, shall bear the costs of this appeal, for which let execution 

issue. 
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Celsia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Jorge Fernandez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Jorge A. Fernandez


Jorge
      A.
      Fernandez


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      13, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            LEV PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
              FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 15, 2005
                                        /s/ Joshua D. Schein
                                        -------------------
                                        Joshua D. Schein
                                        Chief Executive Officer