alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.45

TERMINATION AGREEMENT


This TERMINATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is dated as of 30th December 2016 and entered into by and between:



		(1)	
EASTERN MED CONSULTANTS INC., a company organized and existing under the laws of Marshall Islands having its registered office at Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960 ("Eastern Med"); and








		(2)	
AZARA SERVICES S.A., a company organized and existing under the laws of. Marshall islands having its registered office at Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro, Marshall Islands MEH96960 ("Azara")







(collectively referred to as "Parties", and individually as "Party")


WHEREAS:



		A.	
Eastern Med and Azara have entered into a Consultancy Agreement dated 9th September 2013 with effect as of 1st January 2013, as amended and supplemented from time to time (the "Consultancy Agreement") pursuant to which Azara was engaged to act as consultant for Eastern Med and Ocean Rig .UDW Inc. of Cayman Islands ("UDW") and for any affiliates, subsidiaries or holding companies thereof, as directed. by Eastern Med, in relation to the duties of the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") of UDW and Azara was entitled to receive from Eastern Med the compensation referred therein.








		B.	
The Parties have mutually agreed to terminate at no cost the Consultancy Agreement with effect as of 31st December 2016.







NOW THEREFORE the Parties hereto agree as follows:



		1.	
THAT the Consultancy Agreement shall be terminated at no cost and shall be no longer in force and effect with effect as of 31st December 2016 (the "Effective Date").








		2.	
THAT from the from the Effective Date the Parties hereby mutually release and discharge each other and any of its affiliates, subsidiaries or holding companies and its officers, directors and employees from and against any and all monetary claims, costs, damages, liabilities, and/or any other debts whatsoever which either of the Parties hereto now has or may hereafter have, against the other Party hereto, by reason of, or in connection with the Consultancy Agreement and/or the termination of the Consultancy Agreement pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


(Signalure page to follow.)











	
For and on behalf of


EASTERN MED CONSULTANTS INC.


 


 


 


/s/ Adriano Cefai                                                   


Name: Dr. Adriano Cefai

 Title: Director or OMEGA SERVICES


LIMITED. Sole Director of Eastern Med

 Consultants Inc.


 


Dr. Adriano Cefai


Director


Omega Services Limited


5/1 Merchants Street


Valletta VLT 1171

	
For and on behalf of


AZARA SERVICES S.A.


 


 


 


/s/ Maria Phylactou                            

Name: Maria Phylactou

Title: Director of M.C.R.S.

Limited. Sole Director of Azara

 Services S.A.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2660-028]

On December 26, 2016, Woodland Pulp LLC filed an application to surrender the license for the Forest City Project No. 2660, located on the East Branch of the St. Croix River in Washington and Aroostook Counties, Maine. On December 15, 2023, Woodland Pulp LLC filed a notice withdrawing that application.

                    No motion in opposition to the notice of withdrawal has been filed, and the Commission has taken no action to disallow it. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 216(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,[1]                                          Woodland Pulp's withdraw of its application became effective on January 2, 2024.                

Dated: January 9, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 385.216(b) (2023).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-00718 Filed 1-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2



Amended Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
SCPIE Holdings Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert B. Tschudy  
|                      |  | Robert B. Tschudy      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
 
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
 
                                                                 Names under which
                                      Place of Incorporation     doing business
                                      -------------------------  ---------------------------
<S>                                   <C>                        <C>
 
1.   Voice Systems Technology Inc.    Delaware                   Boston Communications Group

2.   Cellular Express, Inc.           Massachusetts              Boston Communications Group

3.   BCG Securities Corp.             Massachusetts              Boston Communications Group

4.   BCGII Foreign Sales Corp.        Barbados                   BCGII Foreign Sales Corp.
 
5.   BCG de Mexico, S.r.l.            Mexico                     Boston Communications Group
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Consolidated Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Operations included in
Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 1996.  And is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Annual Report on Form 10K for
the year ended December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                            4550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4225
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     304126
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                            4479
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  331615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           522
<OTHER-SE>                                       83691
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    331615
<SALES>                                         318997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                318997
<CGS>                                           281979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   281979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 34610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    152
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 18 December 4, 2003 Board of Directors aaiPharma Inc.
2320 Scientific Park Drive
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403 Note
1 of the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements of
aaiPharma Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 describes a change in the date (from December 31 to October
1) of the Companys annual goodwill impairment test required under Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. There are no authoritative criteria for determining a preferable
measurement date for this analysis based on the particular circumstances;
however, we conclude that such a change in the method of applying SFAS No. 142
is to an acceptable alternative date which, based on your business judgment to
make this change and for the stated reasons, is preferable in your
circumstances. Very truly yours, /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 417 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 417

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
      eligibility of veterans for mortgage revenue bond financing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 14 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Kohl introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the 
      eligibility of veterans for mortgage revenue bond financing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF VETERANS FOR MORTGAGE BONDS DETERMINED BY 
              STATES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 143(l) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified veteran) is amended to read as 
follows:
            ``(4) Qualified veteran.--For purposes of this subsection, 
        the term `qualified veteran' means any veteran who meets such 
        requirements as may be imposed by the State law pursuant to 
        which qualified veterans' mortgage bonds are issued.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to bonds issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DONALD J. BOYER,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 288, 2017

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. N17M-06-327

§ Cr. ID No. 86010533DI (N)

§

§

§

Submitted: October 11, 2017

 Decided: November 8, 2017

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

This 8

th day of November 2017, upon consideration of the appellant’s opening 

brief, the appellee’s motion to affirm, and the record below, it appears to the Court 

that:

(1) The appellant, Donald J. Boyer, filed this appeal from the Superior 

Court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The State of Delaware has 

filed a motion to affirm the judgment below on the ground that it is manifest on the 

face of Shelley’s opening brief that his appeal is without merit. We agree and affirm.

(2) On April 2, 1980, a Superior Court jury found Boyer guilty of multiple 

crimes, including Attempted Murder in the First Degree. Boyer was sentenced to 

life imprisonment for Attempted Murder in the First Degree, plus fourteen years for 
2

his other convictions. This Court affirmed the Superior Court’s judgment on direct 

appeal1as well as the Superior Court’s denial of Boyer’s motions for postconviction 

relief.

2

 

(3) On June 29, 2017, Boyer filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in 

the Superior Court. On July 5, 2017, the Superior Court denied the petition. The 

Superior Court found Boyer was legally detained. This appeal followed. In his 

opening brief, Boyer argues that he has been illegally detained since 1996 because 

the Department of Correction records show a 1996 release date for his sentences. 

(4) In Delaware, the writ of habeas corpus provides relief on a very limited 

basis.3 Habeas corpus only “provides an opportunity for one illegally confined or 

incarcerated to obtain judicial review of the jurisdiction of the court ordering the 

commitment.”

4

 Where the commitment is regular on its face and the court clearly 

had jurisdiction over the subject matter, habeas corpus does not afford a remedy to 

the petitioner.5 

(5) Boyer has offered no evidence that the Superior Court lacked 

jurisdiction to sentence him or that the commitment was irregular on its face. The 

 

1 Boyer v. State, 436 A.2d 1118 (Del. 1981).

2

See, e.g., Boyer v. State, 2014 WL 1512802, at *1 (Del. Apr. 15, 2014) (affirming denial of 

Boyer’s fourth motion for postconviction relief).

3 Hall v. Carr, 692 A.2d 888, 891 (Del. 1997).

4

Id.

5

Jones v. Anderson, 183 A.2d 177, 178 (Del. 1962); Curran v. Woolley, 104 A.2d 771, 773 (Del. 

1954).
3

sentencing order and Department of Correction records reflect Boyer was sentenced 

to life imprisonment for Attempted Murder in the First Degree. The Superior Court 

did not err in denying Boyer’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Affirm is 

GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Leonard D. Schaeffer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

|Date: March 15, 2004 | /s/LEONARD D. SCHAEFFERLeonard D. Schaeffer Chairman of the Board of
Directors
and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|-------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                     |                                                                                                            |  | 

---

I, David C. Colby, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

|Date: March 15, 2004 | /s/DAVID C. COLBYDavid C. Colby Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|                     |                                                                                      |  | 

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SYLAS ROJELIO SWASKEE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-4072 and 4D17-769

[May 17, 2018]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case 

Nos. 20151387 CF10A, 14-13865 CF10A, and 15-973 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Nancy Jack, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. 

Acuna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual Report of ValCom, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the  "Company"), on  Form  10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and   Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Sandra  Markham  the Company's  Secretary and  Treasurer,
certify,   pursuant   to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or  15(d)
of the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2) The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  Company's  financial  condition  and  results  of operations.

                                           Dated:  January 13, 2005

                                           By:    /s/  Sandra Markham
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                       Sandra Markham
                                                       Secretary and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 460 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 460

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to ensure equity in the extent 
  to which businesses located near Interstate and Federal-aid primary 
 highways may erect outdoor advertising signs, displays, and devices, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 22, 1995

   Mr. Ford introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to ensure equity in the extent 
  to which businesses located near Interstate and Federal-aid primary 
 highways may erect outdoor advertising signs, displays, and devices, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highway Advertising Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. ADVERTISING ALONG HIGHWAYS.

    Section 131 of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence of subsection (d), by inserting 
        after ``State law'' the following: ``as of the date of 
        enactment of the Highway Advertising Equity Act or after that 
        date, and that are not subsequently rezoned for other than 
        industrial or commercial purposes''; and
            (2) in subsection (k), by striking ``Subject to'' and all 
        that follows through ``establishing'' and inserting ``A State 
        may not establish''.
                                 <all>
```
233 South Wacker Drive, 23rd Floor–WHQFO, Chicago, IL 60606

April 18, 2016

Mr. Hugh Thomas

Principal Operations Inspector

Federal Aviation Administration

Chicago Certificate Management Field Office

2300 E. Devon Avenue, Room 350

Des Plaines, IL 60018

Re: Exemption 12555

Dear Mr. Thomas,

In accordance with A4A Exemption number 12555, United Airlines is submitting this letter of intent 

requesting exemption from Title 14 CFR § 91.227 for ADS-B OUT equipage by January 2020. United is 

currently planning on completing ADS-B Out equipage by the deadline. However, this exemption will 

allow United sufficient time to equip our fleet should unforeseen equipment production delays occur, and 

it will allow us to operate our aircraft with “SA aware” GPS receivers without using the Service 

Availability Prediction Tool (SAPT). 

United will submit a detailed plan to your office no later than August 1, 2018 detailing our fleet retrofit 

schedule for compliance with 14 CFR §91.227(c) (1) (i) and (iii) per the Condition and Limitation of the 

exemption.

Should you require any additional information regarding this request, please contact me at 

(872) 825-5501.

Sincerely,

Jim Sharkey

Flight Operations FAA Certification Manager 

cc: Scott Chance

Kirk Baldin

Attachment
#### Martin E. RICH, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29946.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 25, 1958.

*589No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

The conviction is for the felony offense of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The State’s testimony shows that the appellant was stopped and arrested by City Officer Floyd E. Graham, while driving his automobile upon a public street in the City of Corpus Christi, after the officer had observed him drive through an intersection controlled by a red light. Officer Graham, in describing appellant’s actions and appearance at the time of his arrest, testified that “he staggered”, “his eyes were blurred or watery”, “he was thick tongued in his talk, and in his speech”, his breath “smelled of alcohol” and expressed his opinion that appellant was intoxicated.

The State’s testimony further shows that a blood specimen taken from the appellant with his consent, upon being analyzed at the Adler Laboratory, was found to contain .22% alcohol. Dr. John Pelcher testified that a person with such percentage of alcohol in his blood would be intoxicated.

Proof was made of the prior misdemean- or conviction as alleged and appellant admitted that he had been so convicted.

As a witness in his own behalf appellant admitted having had two drinks of whiskey shortly before his arrest but denied that he was under the influence of alcohol. Appellant’s wife, who was a passenger in the automobile, upon being called as a witness in his behalf, corroborated his testimony and testified that he was not under the influence of alcohol.

The jury chose to accept the State’s evidence and reject that of the appellant and we find the same sufficient to support their verdict.

No formal bills of exception appear in the record.

We have carefully considered the informal bills and they do not reflect error.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the court.