alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte William E. L. THOMAS.

No. 38200.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1965.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 1965.

*910• Tom Upchurch, Jr., Amarillo, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDONALD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the 47th District Court of Potter County remanding appellant to the custody of the Sheriff of said County for delivery to an agent for the State of Louisiana.

The Governor’s warrant and the supporting papers were introduced that showed appellant to be charged by affidavit with the offense of theft of $98.10. The Governor’s warrant made a prima facie case. Ex Parte Kaufman, 168 Tex.Cr.R. 55, 323 S.W.2d 48, 49.

• The appellant testified that he was not in the State of Louisiana at the time the offense was alleged to have been committed. We held in Ex Parte Ackton, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 548, 301 S.W.2d 86, that the testimony of the accused standing alone is not sufficient to require a finding that he was not in the demanding state on the date alleged.

Appellant contends that the supporting papers show that he had committed the crime of forgery and that the Governor’s warrant and the requisition show that he was charged with theft. Theft may be committed in different ways in Texas, even though the facts might show another crime, such as swindling by worthless check or forgery. Windham v. State, 169 Tex.Cr.R. 451, 335 S.W.2d 219. In the absence of a showing to the contrary it is presumed that the law of Louisiana is similar to the law of this state. It is not the province of this Court to pass upon the guilt or innocence of an appellant in an extradition proceeding.

The Governor’s warrant is sufficient. Appellant did not raise an issue as to his identity.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                              JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         15,360
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  15,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               79,483
<PP&E>                                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 79,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         148,836
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                        5,498
<OTHER-SE>                                                    (74,851)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   79,483
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 127,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              1,809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (129,319)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (129,319)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (129,319)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.03)



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4652-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Mexico (FEMA-4652-DR), dated May 4, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued January 22, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of New Mexico is hereby amended to include the Disaster Case Management program for the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of May 4, 2022.

Sandoval County for the Disaster Case Management program (already designated for Public Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-02366 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASH I NGTO N , D

.C

. 20460

John V. Massingale Greenwich Chemical Consulting, Inc 3300 PGA Boulevard , Suite 635 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 

### OCT Z Z

2015

Re: Request for extension to submit final reports for fish. daphnid and algal toxicity tests for D-erythro-hex-2-enonic acid, gamma. -lactone, monosodium salt (Sodium erythorbate)(CASRN 63 81 -77-7) Dear Mr. Massingale : EPA has received your October 19, 2015 , letter on behalf ofUnivar USA , Inc., (Univar) requesting an extension oftime to submit final reports for the required fish and Daphnia acute toxicity and algal toxicity testing for D-gluco-heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi .)- (CASRN 6381-77

-7). These studies were required by a test rule issued under section 4 ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act on January 7 , 20 II (76 FR I067) (HVP2). Your letter states that Univar is requesting an extension through January 15, 2016, for the fish and Daphnia studies, and through April 15, 2016, for the algal toxicity study. Your letter notes that additional work was needed (and completed) in order to determine how best to conduct all of these studies
. This additional work has caused delay in the anticipated completion ofthese studies by October 31 , 2015. The algal test, in particular, has posed difficult technical issues and requires a revised study plan that will need to be reviewed by EPA. EPA notes that the technical difficulties discovered through ongoing work with this chemical has resulted in the need for several reviews by EPA and subsequent revisions ofprotocols , as described in your letter and EPA ' s previous letter to you dated February 12 , 2015. EPA agrees that the additional work described in your extension request will require further time to start and complete the required endpoint studies. Therefore, EPA is granting the requested extension to submit the final reports for the acute toxicity tests for fish and Daphnia , by January 16, 2016 , and the test for algal toxicity by April 16 , 2016.

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted with Vegetable O i l Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperI f you have a ny questions , please contact Jo hn Schaeffer of my staff (schaeffer.john @ epa.gov; 202-564-8173) . cc: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531

1 e e e Acting Chief Chemical Inform ation and Tes t in g Branch (MC 7405M)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned, as chief financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2) the informationcontained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 29, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

/s/ FRANKBURKE        

**Frank Burke**

**Chief Financial Officer**

 

Date: August 13, 2003 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered April 4, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01154-CR

No. 05-13-01155-CR

TOMMY EXIQUIO MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-51119-M, F10-51168-M

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s April 1, 2014 motion to accept the contemporaneously 

filed letter brief. We ORDER the State’s letter brief received on April 1, 2014 filed as of the 

date of this order.

On February 27, 2014, the Court adopted the trial court’s findings regarding the 

indictment and plea papers for cause no. 05-13-01155-CR (trial court no. F10-51168-M) and

ordered the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing the issue of whether appellant was 

charged with the same offense in the two indictments and whether appellant pleaded guilty to the 

same offense as alleged in the two indictments. We have received appellant’s supplemental brief 

which raises the issue that the conviction in cause no. 05-13-01155-CR constitutes a double 
jeopardy violation and the State’s letter brief stating the State not only does not object to 

appellant’s receipt of the requested relief but agrees appellant should receive the requested relief.

Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal submitted, without argument, on April 28, 2014 to a 

panel consisting of Justices Lang, Myers, and Brown.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### Gary N. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE, Respondent.

No. 03-3077.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 8, 2003.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial

Statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Michael G. Carlton, the Chief Executive Officer of Crescent Financial Corporation, in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q
filed by Crescent Financial Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 11, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Carlton               
|                   |  |     |  | Michael G. Carlton                   
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



- 28 -
Exhibit 99.3



Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AdvancePCS (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the
period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Yon Y. Jorden, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    YON Y. JORDEN                 
|                                     
|Yon Y. Jorden Chief Financial Officer



July
18, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 351 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 351

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the credit 
                  for increasing research activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 3 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Baucus, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the credit 
                  for increasing research activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CREDIT FOR INCREASING RESEARCH ACTIVITIES MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 41 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to credit for increasing research activities) is amended by 
striking subsection (h).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (1) of section 28(b) of such 
Code is amended by striking subparagraph (D).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after June 30, 1995.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
                      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
     As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accenture SCA (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joe W. Forehand,
Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general partner of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
       Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.

                                            /s/  Joe W. Forehand
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Joe W. Forehand
                                            Chief Executive Officer of
                                              Accenture Ltd
                                            Dated: October 30, 2002
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

R. Wayne Johnson , Appellant

No. 06

- 24

- 00006

- CV v.

Robert Ramirez, et al. , Appellees Appeal from the 62nd District Court of

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 92217 ).

Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and

Justices van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

van Cleef

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismis s the appeal.

We note that the appellant, R. Wayne Johnson , has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 25, 2024
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
# **Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thomas E. Dunn, certify that: 

 

 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of SI International, Inc.; 

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the fiscal quarters covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the fiscal quartersand fiscal years presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and we have: 

 

a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the fiscal period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared; 

 

b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c)  Presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)  All significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and 

 

b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6.  The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 
| August 11,  2003 |   |   |
|------------------|--------|--------|
|             |   |   | /s/ |
|             |   | By:    |   |
|             |   |   | Thomas E. Dunn**Executive Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer** |

 

----
### Docket No.: FAA**- 2011**  **- 1321** 

**Contacts.** With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted **Date** Response **National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti**  10 /7/10 **Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer**  **Connie Arnold**  10/7/10

**Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman**  10/7/10 **ATA Joe White**  10/7/10
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
   
We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-2 of our report dated February 17, 1997
relating to the financial statements of Datum Inc., which appears in such
Prospectus. We also consent to the application of such report to the Financial
Statement Schedule for the three years ended December 31, 1996 appearing on page
S-1 of this Registration Statement when such schedule is read in conjunction
with the financial statements referred to in our report. The audits referred to
in such report also included these Financial Statement Schedules. We also
consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts" and "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" in such Prospectus. However, it should be noted
that Price Waterhouse LLP has not prepared or certified such "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data."
    
 
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
 
Costa Mesa, California
   
March 25, 1997