alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 417

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the eligibility

of veterans for mortgage revenue bond financing.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 14 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. KOHL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect

to the eligibility of veterans for mortgage revenue bond

financing.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY OF VETERANS FOR MORTGAGE

4 BONDS DETERMINED BY STATES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 143(l)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified

7 veteran) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(4) QUALIFIED VETERAN.—For purposes of

9 this subsection, the term ‘qualified veteran’ means

10 any veteran who meets such requirements as may be
2

•S 417 IS

1 imposed by the State law pursuant to which quali2 fied veterans’ mortgage bonds are issued.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 subsection (a) shall apply to bonds issued after the date

5 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7880

In Re: GEORGE BOYD STONE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-93-3)

Submitted: January 19, 2005 Decided: February 2, 2005

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Boyd Stone, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

On December 1, 2003, George Boyd Stone filed a petition

for writ of mandamus, seeking an order from this court requiring

the district court to rule on Stone’s September 11, 2002 motion to

preserve evidence in his criminal case. The motion was denied on

June 12, 2003, rendering Stone’s petition moot. Thus, Stone

requests that his petition be construed as a notice of appeal from

the district court’s June 12 order. However, even if we construed

the petition as Stone requests, the notice of appeal would be

untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1). Moreover, although Stone

contends that he did not receive timely notice of the denial of his

motion, we are without jurisdiction to extend the time to appeal.

See United States v. Little, 2004 WL 2955027, *7 (4th Cir. Dec. 22,

2004). Accordingly, we grant Stone’s motion to proceed in forma

pauperis, deny Stone’s petition for writ of mandamus, and deny his

request to construe the petition as a notice of appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 99.1(a)
                                                                 
                             OPTION
                               ONE
                      MORTGAGE CORPORATION
                                

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, Option One
Mortgage Corporation has complied in all material respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers (USAP).  As of and for this same period, Option
One Mortgage Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond and errors
and omissions policy in the amount of $50 Million.


\s\ Robert E. Dubrish    2/15/97     \s\ William L. O'Neill   2/15/97
Robert E. Dubrish                      William L. O'Neill
Chief Executive Officer                Chief Financial Officer
                                
\s\ Jill Bright      2/15/97                 
Jill Bright                     
Date
Controller
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 21

                               I-FLOW CORPORATION
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


Following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company which are included in the
Company's consolidated financial statements:

                                                State of Jurisdiction
Name                                               of Incorporation
----                                            ---------------------

Block Medical, Inc.                             California

Block Medical de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.           Mexico
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 31, 2007



/s/    DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. PasseriPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
|                                                |        |                        |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                                           |   | State of Incorporation |
| Insurance Subsidiaries:                        |   |                   |
| EquiTrust Life Insurance Company               |   | Iowa                   |
| Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company             |   | Iowa                   |
| Noninsurance Subsidiaries:                     |   |                   |
| EquiTrust Assigned Benefit Company             |   | Iowa                   |
| EquiTrust Financial Group                      |   | Iowa                   |
| EquiTrust Investment Management Services, Inc. |   | Delaware               |
| EquiTrust Marketing Services, L.L.C.           |   | Delaware               |
| FBL Financial Group Capital Trust              |   | Delaware               |
| FBL Financial Group Capital Trust II           |   | Delaware               |
| FBL Financial Services, Inc.                   |   | Iowa                   |
| FBL Leasing Services, Inc.                     |   | Iowa                   |
| 5400 Holdings, L.L.C.                          |   | Iowa                   |
| 7100 Holdings, L.L.C.                          |   | Iowa                   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FILM ROMAN, INC., AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTH AND NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       3,403,895               3,403,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  677,538                 677,538
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                 27,819,482              27,819,482
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       1,557,097               1,557,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 725,941                 725,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,629,804              33,629,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                      1,230,000               1,230,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                  7,474,400               7,474,400
<COMMON>                                           700                     700
<OTHER-SE>                                   (691,345)               (691,345)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,629,804              33,629,804
<SALES>                                     11,108,312              24,824,010
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,108,312              24,824,010
<CGS>                                       10,245,746              23,172,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,245,746              23,172,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,002,187               2,596,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,339                  94,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,282)               (850,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (108,282)               (850,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (108,282)               (850,453)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)                  (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)                  (0.49)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-37803) of Homestead Village Incorporated (Homestead) and in the 
related Prospectus, and the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-17243, 
333-17245 and 333-48163, pertaining to the Homestead Village Incorporated 1996 
Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Homestead Village Incorporated 1996 Outside 
Directors Plan and the Homestead Village Incorporated 401(K) Savings Plan of 
our report dated February 24, 1997, with respect to the financial statements of 
Homestead as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.



                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 24, 1998
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 IMPRESO, INC.
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
November 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.3.
    
    Item 4 Controls and Procedures in the Companys Form 10-Q is incorporated
herein by reference.
   /s/ Marshall D. SorokwaszName:
    
    Marshall D. SorokwaszTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 31.2
 Certifications for Form 10-Q
             Date: August 14, 2008
    
    Name:
Title:
    
    /s/ Daniel L. Erickson

Executive Vice PresidentChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 316 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 316

To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws 
 of the United States to perform an abortion with knowledge that such 
abortion is being performed solely because of the gender of the fetus, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 1 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Helms introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To make it a violation of a right secured by the Constitution and laws 
 of the United States to perform an abortion with knowledge that such 
abortion is being performed solely because of the gender of the fetus, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civil Rights of Infants Act''.

SEC. 2. DEPRIVING PERSONS OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAWS BEFORE BIRTH.

    Section 1979 of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1983) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a)'' before ``Every person''; and
            (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(b) For purposes of subsection (a), and for purposes of other 
provisions of law, it shall be a deprivation of a `right' secured by 
the laws of the United States for an individual to perform an abortion 
with the knowledge that the pregnant woman is seeking the abortion 
solely because of the gender of the fetus. No pregnant woman who seeks 
to obtain an abortion solely on the basis of the gender of the fetus 
shall be liable in any manner under this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      11,217,429
<SECURITIES>                                21,031,568
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,740,305
<PP&E>                                       2,015,095
<DEPRECIATION>                               (321,693)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,021,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,927,942
<BONDS>                                        977,213
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,886
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,106,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,021,585
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,146,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              89,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,854,572)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,854,572)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (21,854,572)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.37
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6588

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY GLENN SIMMONS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CR-93-8-H, CA-97-22-2-1H)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Glenn Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Simmons, Nos. CR-93-8-H; CA-92-22-2-1H

(E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 2.11
 James Hardie  Form of 364-day Facility Agreement
  To: (Financier) #1#
 Date: June 2008
 Revised Extension Request  James Hardie  364-day Facility Agreement dated #3# June 2005 between
James Hardies International Finance BV (Borrower and
Obligors Agent) and #1# (Financier)
(Facility Agreement)
     
    
    The Facility Limit applicable from the current Maturity Date will be US#4#.
    
    The new Maturity Date will be 11 June 2009.
    
    The Revised Margin of #5#% per annum will only apply from the current Maturity Date
(#6# December 2008) to the new Maturity Date (11 June 2009). At the new Maturity Date (11
June 2009) the margin will revert to the Margin stated in the Details of the Facility
Agreement, unless otherwise agreed between us.
    
    The Commitment Fee will be #7# per annum (being #8#% of the applicable margin)
    
    No Extension Fee is payable in connection with this Extension Request.
  [Name of person]being an
Authorised Officer of
    
    
    
    [Name of person]being an
Authorised Officer of
 James Hardie International Finance BV
##### 



Exhibit 10.25
 ARADIGM CORPORATION  2005 Equity Incentive Plan
 Restricted Stock Bonus Agreement
   1. Vesting .
 2. Number of Shares .
 3. Securities Law Compliance .
 4. Right of Reacquisition .
 (a)
 (b)
 (i)
 1.




---



##### 



(ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 (v)
 5. Restrictive Legends.
 6. Award not a Service Contract .
 2.




---



##### 



7. Withholding Obligations.
 (a)
 (b)
 8. Tax Consequences.
 9. Notices .
 10. Miscellaneous .
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 11. Governing Plan Document .
 3.




---



##### 



Joint Escrow Instructions
  
   1.
 2.
 3.
 4.
 5.
 1.




---



##### 



6.
 7.
 8.
 9.
 10.
 11.
 12.
 13.
 14.
 2.




---



##### 



15.
 Company:
    
    Aradigm Corporation
3929 Point Eden Way
Hayward, CA 94545
Attn: Chief Financial OfficerRecipient:Escrow Agent:
    
    Aradigm Corporation
3929 Point Eden Way
Hayward, CA 94545
Attn: Corporate Secretary
 16.
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
 3.




---



##### 



17.
 Very truly yours,Aradigm CorporationBy:RecipientName: Escrow Agent:
 ________________________
 4.




---



##### 



Assignment Separate From Certificate
 For Value Received
  Signature: _________________________ [Instruction: ]
#### Daniel R. DeNARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANCHORAGE, Municipality of, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-35658.

D.C. No. CV-00-00247-HRH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*121Submitted July 22, 2002 *.

Decided July 30, 2002.

Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument, and denies DeNardo’s request for oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Daniel R. DeNardo appeals pro se the district court’s orders awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, *Gates v. Deukmejian,*987 F.2d 1392, 1396 (9th Cir.1992), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that DeNardo’s action, filed well beyond the statute of limitations period, was without foundation, frivolous, and unreasonable. *See DeNardo v. Murphy,*781 F.2d 1345, 1347 (9th Cir.1986). The district court properly awarded attorney’s fees totaling $4,181 for 22.6 hours of work at the rate of $185 per hour. *See Gates,*987 F.2d at 1397-98.

The district court properly denied the motion for reconsideration because it merely reargued matters which were the subject of the attorneys fees motion, and failed to demonstrate any error of fact or law. *See Sch. Dist. No. 1J Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc.,*5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993).

We lack jurisdiction to address DeNardo’s contentions regarding the merits of the district court’s original entry of judgment because DeNardo failed to timely appeal the district court’s summary judgment and the district court’s order denying the motion for reconsideration of summary judgment.

We have considered DeNardo’s remaining contentions and conclude that they lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                    76,213
<INVENTORY>                                    146,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,247,518
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,247,518
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          122,993
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,949
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,120,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,247,518
<SALES>                                         50,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,000
<CGS>                                           61,631
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>