alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on December 20, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), OpenJS Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Tafsol Technologies, Karachi, PAKISTAN, has been added as a party to this venture.                

Also, FlowForge has changed its name to FlowFuse, San Francisco, CA.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and OpenJS Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 17, 2015, OpenJS Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 28, 2015 (80 FR 58297).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on July 27, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 69670).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-02225 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02250]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--DVD Copy Control Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 20, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), DVD Copy Control 
Association (``DVD CCA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, APTIV Services, LLC, Troy, MI; Deluxe 
Digital Studios Inc., Burbank, CA; and Sunext Technology Corporation 
Limited, Hsin-Chu, TAIWAN, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and DVD CCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 11, 2001, DVD CCA filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
August 3, 2001 (66 FR 40727).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 15, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on August 22, 2023 (88 FR 57130).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-02250 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 13.2



Compañía de Minas Buenaventura
S.A.A.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



| | 1. | I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the “Company”).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | (A)       The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2014 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(B)       The
information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 30, 2015



| | /s/ Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos
| | -----------------------------
| | Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos    
| | Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSF Group Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 2nd Quarter 2005 ending September 25,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John M. Meyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company. /s/ John M. Meyer
    .John M. MeyerChief Executive OfficerNovember 9, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 22
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1983 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1983

To amend the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to 
   provide for Native Hawaiian organizations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 1996

  Mr. Inouye (for himself, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Akaka) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act to 
   provide for Native Hawaiian organizations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES PROTECTION AND 
              REPATRIATION ACT.

    (a) Written Consent Required if Native American Remains Are 
Excavated or Removed for Purposes of Study.--Section 3(c) of the Native 
American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3002(c)) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end of the 
        paragraph;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) in the case of any intentional excavation or removal 
        of Native American human remains for purposes of study, such 
        remains are excavated or removed after written consent is 
        obtained from--
                    ``(A) lineal descendants, if known or readily 
                ascertainable; or
                    ``(B) the appropriate Indian tribe or Native 
                Hawaiian organization.''.
    (b) Requirements for Inadvertent Discoveries.--Section 3(d) of the 
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 
3002(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``with respect to tribal 
        lands, if known or readily ascertainable'' and inserting ``. 
        With respect to tribal lands, such notification shall be 
        provided to the appropriate Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian 
        organization,''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following: 
        ``Any person or entity that disposes of or controls any such 
        cultural item shall adhere to the applicable requirements of 
        subsection (c).''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed, June 19, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00228-CR

____________

MAURICIO PINEDA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1320953

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 06, 2013. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. On May 16, 2013 this court granted Tammy Adams motion for extension 

of time to file the record until June 05, 2013. The court has not received a request 

to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. 

Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following 

order.
We order Tammy Adams, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended August 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, H. Michael Krimbill, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 12, 2005



/s/ H. Michael KrimbillH. Michael KrimbillPresident and Chief Financial Officer


---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Susan R. Nowakowski, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 7, 2010



/S/    SUSAN R.
NOWAKOWSKISusan R. NowakowskiPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Dale E. Parker, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Appleton Papers Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 7, 2003
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandu m Opinion filed

June 9 , 2022.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00277

- CV

IN RE J.B. HUNT TRAN SPORT, INC. , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 11th District Court Harris County, Texas T rial Cour t Cause No. 2021

- 53485



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 20, 2022 , relator J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. , filed a petition for writ
of m andamus and emergency motion for temporary relief in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex . R. Ap p. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Kristen Brauchle Hawkins, presiding judge of the 11th District Court of Harris County
, to vacate those portions of the
trial court ’ s April 4, 2022, production order that req uire J. B. Hunt to “produce a2

description of the topics covering Texas CMV drivers on public roadways in effect
from 1/1/2020 to date of crash relating to ‘employee driving,’ ‘vehicle operation,’ ‘driving practices and procedure s,’ and ‘cell phone use’” or “ tables of contents from J.B. Hunt’s training and safety materials in response to RFP Nos. 68

– 71. ”
On April 22, 2022, this Court granted relator ’ s “ emergency motion for temporary relief from and stay of the production order

. ” The Court did not stay all

pr oceedin gs in the underlying matter.
By order signed on May 6, 2022, the trial judge vacated its April 4, 2022
disco very order. Because the order that is the subject of this mandamus proceeding has been vacated, the original proc eeding has been ren dered moot.

A ccordingly, we dismiss re la tor’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot

.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report of EP MedSystems, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, based on his knowledge, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date:
March 30, 2007



/s/    MATTHEW C.
HILLMatthew C. HillChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

July 24, 2012

h0716

Order 

July 24, 2012

142875

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142875

COA: 295497

Ottawa CC: 09-033711-FH

BENJAMIN CURTIS WALBURG,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of June 22, 2011, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 

2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decisions in 

People v Kolanek (Docket Nos. 142695, 142712) and People v King (Docket No. 

142850). On order of the Court, the cases having been decided on May 31, 2012, 491 

Mich ___ (2012), the application is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are 

not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed January 4, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2422

Lower Tribunal No. 20-406A

________________

V.M.A., a juvenile,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Scott M. 

Bernstein, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Citing due process concerns, V.M.A., a juvenile, appeals from final 

orders withholding adjudication of delinquency and placing V.M.A. on 

probation for aggravated battery. The challenged orders were rendered after 

the trial court, over V.M.A.’s objection, conducted V.M.A.’s adjudicatory 

hearing remotely, using the Zoom videoconferencing platform.1

 In overruling 

V.M.A.’s objection, the trial court, noting that the State did not agree to an “in 

person” adjudicatory hearing, relied upon an August 6, 2021 administrative 

memorandum issued by the Administrative Judge for the Unified Children’s 

Court Division of the Miami-Dade Children’s Courthouse that then required 

all juvenile adjudicatory hearings be conducted remotely unless the parties

agreed to appear in person. The trial court, though, did not make any casespecific findings of why it was necessary to conduct the adjudicatory hearing

remotely.

1 The remote hearing conducted below occurred on October 25-26, 2021, 

while the Florida Supreme Court’s In re Comprehensive COVID-19 

Emergency Measures for the Florida State Courts, Fla. Admin. Order No. 

AOSC20-23, Amend. 13 (May 6, 2021) was in effect. This administrative 

order provided, in relevant part, that:

• “The presiding judge in all cases must consider the 

constitutional rights of crime victims and criminal defendants and 

the public’s constitutional right of access to the courts.” Id. at 3.

• “[J]uvenile delinquency cases shall be conducted remotely if 

ordered by the chief judge or the presiding judge or, if not, must 

be conducted in person.” Id. at 14.
3

In M.D. v. State, 345 So. 3d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022), J.T.B. v. State, 

345 So. 3d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022), and K.M. v. State, 347 So. 3d 435 (Fla. 

3d DCA 2022), which are indistinguishable in all material respects from the 

instant case, this Court concluded that due process considerations inherent 

in delinquency proceedings require the trial court to make case-specific 

findings of necessity before conducting a remote adjudicatory hearing. 

Because the trial court did not make the requisite findings, we reverse the 

challenged orders and remand for a new adjudicatory hearing.

Reversed and remanded.