alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Elbert CENTERS, Appellant, v. Mary Belle Banks CENTERS, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 19, 1956.

Leebern Allen, F. T. Allen, Campton, for appellant.

E. E. Black, Campton, for appellee.

MILLIKEN, Chief Justice.-

This is an appeal from a judgment which granted the appellee, Mary Belle Banks Centers, a divorce, $75 for hospital and medical expense, and $50 a month as maintenance and support for the appellee, her child and the child which was expected to be born shortly after the granting of the divorce. ' ' ■ ■ . •

The record before us, which is in narrative form, discloses the conflicting nature of the testimony as to the divorce itself, and reveals that the money income of the husband-appellant was not . substantial. After a consideration of the record, we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### Chester A. WHITE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29704.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 9, 1958.

Clifton Tupper, San Angelo, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The offense is burglary; the punishment,, two years in the penitentiary.

The testimony of the owner of two-saddles and the house from which the saddles were taken; the sheriff who recovered the saddles which were returned to and properly identified by the owner, and an accomplice who related all the facts before *640and after the breaking and entering of the house and the taking of the saddles, and the sale of them to the person from whom they were recovered, is sufficient to sustain the conviction.

Appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in his behalf.

*No*formal bills of exception appear in the record.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction for ordinary burglary as charged because the evidence shows the burglary of a private residence at night.

The saddles were taken at night from a ranch house located in Coleman County. The owner of the ranch house testified that he lived with his wife in Brownwood which was his mailing address and also where he paid his poll tax, but that he stayed at his ranch house part of the time. The owner was asked the following question (referring to the ranch house) on cross-examination : “Q. It was your part time residence ?' A. Yes.” The owner further testified that all the furniture in the ranch house at the time the saddles were taken consisted of a folding cot, a steel cot, and a. table; and that he considered his legal residence to be in Brownwood.

The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the trial court to conclude as a matter of law that the ranch house in question was being used as a private residence.

Appellant contends that he has been deprived of his right to a speedy trial. In the absence of any request or demand, it appears that appellant is not now entitled to rely upon the state’s failure to act. 1 Branch, 2d Ed., p. 615, Sec. 648; Goss v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 37, 274 S.W.2d 697.

The evidence is sufficient to support the conviction and no reversible error appearing the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 21 (Wednesday, January 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6153-6154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Monday, January 29, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topic:
    Resolution of litigation claims.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.


[[Page 6154]]


    Dated: January 29, 2024.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-01974 Filed 1-29-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
From: Tara Fitzgerald

To: Park, Iain J

Cc: Robert Green ; Daniel Tibuni ; Timoleon Mouzakis ; Diane Cook

Subject: Re: FW: Revision to T1000 Exemption request

Date: 01/24/2014 11:59 AM

Iain,

Please clarify your response to first question from the 12/31/2013 letter.

Please clarify your response for why the exemption is needed by providing data to show why the Trent 1000 Package C configuration does not meet 33.27 requirements while previous Trent 1000 models met the requirement.

Please clarify what testing Rolls-Royce has done on Trent 1000 Package C configuration engines to support your terminal speed estimates.

Please clarify your response to which models require the exemption by providing the terminal speeds and margins for each model.

Tara Fitzgerald

Federal Aviation Administration Engine & Propeller Directorate Rulemaking and Policy, ANE-111 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803

781-238-7130

▼ "Park, Iain J" ---01/23/2014 10:21:58 AM---Tara Bob has just reported the same
thing. Please try this version - I sent it to myself and it appe

From: "Park, Iain J" <Iain.Park@Rolls-Royce.com>

ANE-111, Rulemaking and Policy

To: Tara Fitzgerald/ANE/FAA@FAA,

Cc: "Park, Iain J" <Iain.Park@Rolls-Royce.com>

Date: 01/23/2014 10:21 AM Subject: FW: Revision to T1000 Exemption request

Tara

Bob has just reported the same thing. Please try this version – I sent it to myself

and it appeared to be OK.

Please tell me if it works as I need to worry about the version I have posted on the

regulation.gov site

_____________________________________________ From: Park, Iain JSent: 23 January 2014 15:17

To: Robert.Green@faa.gov Subject: Revision to T1000 Exemption request

Please try this version – if it works could you tell me and I will forward it to Tara

Please find attached, a revised petition providing the additional information in

support of the petition presented in our letter to the FAA dated December 9,

2013. This submission specifically responds to a letter we received from the FAA,

Aircraft and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, dated December

31, 2013.

**Iain J Park**

Airworthiness Specialist

Rolls-royce plc

Tel: +44 (0) 1332249292

Mob: +44 (0) 7968906666

e-mail: iain.park@rolls-royce.com

The data contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain confidential

information. If you have received it in error you should notify the sender

immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and contact

+44 (0) 1332 242424 (the Rolls-Royce IT Security Director) if you need

assistance. Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to

any other person.

An e-mail response to this address may be subject to interception or monitoring for operational reasons or for lawful business practices.(c) 2013 Rolls-Royce plc

Registered office: 65 Buckingham Gate, London SW1E 6AT Company

number: 1003142. Registered in England. [attachment "HP shaft overspeed

- petition.pdf" deleted by Tara Fitzgerald/ANE/FAA]
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

      I, David Hope, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of
Auto-Q International, Inc (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



/s/  David Hope
----------------------------------
Name:      David Hope
Date:      May 19, 2003



                                  EXHIBIT 99.2
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 166 ) ll-E-1 7 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/2008 9:50:59 AM Sheet 166 of 276P. 2

/ 

## W^ /T /

CONVERSATIO N RECUrvu f K* * . ^ s~i. <- ••- •, a /*> . i 

# >*\\*hr 

# L •SIYPE/O V

A y /o /

D

V,SI T ^ Loca^oh/o fVisit/Conf«r«nc* : •CONFERENC E
i^->- - NAMi<0 /

WlWYO l TELEPHON E Q INCOMIN G ( yOUTGOIN G PERSON(S ) CONTACTE D O R I N CONTAC T *-YO U 

# ^£/^*rV S^iv-U ^ ORGANIZATIO N (Office , dept. . Bureau , etc. ) TELEPHON E NO : 

## (HiH) Wilis'? SUB0EC T \A/E-f ?g ^ O ~ f gy t U/qjV , i *•<-T^- W ROUTIN G NAME/SYMBO L 

# tUv- U • V 

# V- ' 7 * -tpgfg ^ 

## -JUr ^«M 3 

## r-- u Vtfc- * /V \<.K)lg)uy3 >

IN T

SUMMAR Y 

# '',M» - H ^ 3U-tt w 

# l AUvk > cJ . -fv—

- l«J k I \ + U L^ * Ov*. w u PC 4

J^*>4 , -fc > kuJ^ N i*-* / tLd ~ "t*M y^ U v ^ j-~ b 4"°-! . c-W

* O ^ . ^ 

# f jwt ~ o i^ayq^v

w . H* - ' . nl

ic<$ 4 \~\M« *JA \ o er" f * < *>- • V ELg. ) j- j m^L > VA ± |1U;0K ^

. a- T<

•o r T{ U ( -A - I ? ^^gJ l gy y^ol t g-g>vo | 0 yj Cil A(Lfrv ^ ,'t~i > ^ f{« - (VsT o ^

i j I cJlA-f-io X -t~L vwirfl - J-V KI'*-* ? U ^ "T ^ «i U f^-Mz/h i >oa Y 

## T " " * U*/ > ?* -

q u " wli'^ TTV<^ S 1*1*3 - -T"dLa y/u-^iT " ~f~ J V~P>>< g /)WV« ^ V^ g vu ' re*n< T f ^v^ajl: ^

V w& f 7

T .
* • 

## ZL-,>,-f*,^ i Ai ar 

## k -T-Ld r V/E-CL P v \ 

## o« fCg*/ H * } • ACTIO N REQUIRE D

NAM E O F PERSOt i DOCUMENTIN G CONV£»SATIO N CM,' " SIGNATUR E ACTIO N TAKE N ^ ^

l//p/r » A"///S o 3 1 k^s X c^CT^iXe^ L Wai t Jt- t V^/ ^ «^ i J <J U U*- 4 *fJl-Hud t TK» - P^-*T^ yj\^M^'j___Qjr SIGNATUR E ATUR t TITL E
50271-10 1 USOP O 19* 5 -461- 2 7'

* CONVERSATIO N RECOR D OPTIONA L FOM M 77 1 (12-76 ) DEPARTMEN TO F DEFENS E
EXHIBIT 99.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  filing of the Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB  for
The quarter ended  June 30, 2002 (the "Report") by SALES STRATEGIES, INC. the
undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report complies in all material respects with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
     and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
     Registrant.

Dated:  July 28, 2003

                                    /s/ Alan Schram
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Name:   Alan Schram
                                    Title:  Chief Executive Officer
                                            and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 359 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 359

To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric projects located 
                     in the State of West Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 6 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

  Mr. Byrd (for himself and Mr. Rockefeller) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the extension of certain hydroelectric projects located 
                     in the State of West Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission projects 
numbered 6901 and 6902, the Commission shall, upon the request of the 
licensee for those projects, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section, the 
Commission's procedures under that section, and the procedures 
specified in that section, extend the time period during which the 
licensee is required to commence construction of those projects so as 
to terminate on October 3, 1999.
    (b) Applicability.--Subsection (a) shall take effect for the 
projects upon the expiration of the extension, issued by the Commission 
under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806), of the 
period required for commencement of construction of the projects.
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If a license for a project 
described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of 
the date of its expiration and extend the time required for 
commencement of construction of the project until October 3, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Vincent A. Paccapaniccia, Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |                                    
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|March 10, 2004 |  | /s/ Vincent A. Paccapaniccia       
|               |  | Vincent A. Paccapaniccia           
|               |  | Executive Vice President, Corporate
|               |  | Finance and Chief Financial Officer
reservation. Neighboring the reservation isthe Cleveland National Forest tothe north and east and private agricultural lan:ls tothe south and west.

3. Population Density and Degree of Urbanization While San Diego County isone ofthe most populated counties in California, the northern part of the county and the Pala Reservation specifically is sparsely populated. The Census Bureau defines an “urban area” asan area containing at least 1,000 persons per square mile. The Reservation consists of 12,449 acres, or 19.45 square miles. With a population of 1,315, the

reservation population density is68 persons per square mile. Compare this with the City ofSan Diego ata population of I.5 million anda density of 3,877 persons per square mile, andit becomes readily apparent Oat the two entities are vastly different. The Reservation is60 miles tothe north ofthe City ofSm Diego. To combine these two entities into the same geographic area forthe purpose ofair quality classification simply because they are within the same county isnot reasonable. 4. Traffic and Commuting Patterns US l-Iighway ISis a major commuter corridor between San Diego County inthe south and Riverside County tothe nor:h. Traffic volumes are heavy and contribute tothe overall deterioration ofair quality. US-IS is located seven miles west ofthe Pala Reservation. Prevailing winds blow from the Southwest toward the reservation. The Pauma Valley is narrow and affords a limited area ol exposure to commuter traffic pollution. California State l-lighway

76 crosses the Reservation fom eastto west. Caltrans traffic volume counts show a peak hourly volume of 1,200 vehicles. Vehicles using S}-l-76 areamix of local residents, visitors tothe casinos and limited commutr traffic. 5. Growth Rates and Patterns Overall the growth rateinSm Diego County is declining, both numerically and percentage-wise. The slowed growth rate county-wide isin response toout migration by those seeking more affordable housing. Ofthe 12,449 acres within the Reservation only 2,639 acres are fee land which have strict regulations governing their disposition. Land development and concurrent population growth onthe Pala Reservation is strictly regulated bythe U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affiuirs in concert with the Pala Band of Mission Indians, and not

subject tothe same developniental pressures as privately held lands elsewhere. With atotal

tribal population of762 therc is little demand for development atthe present time. \Vith significant growth restraints, air quality onthe reservation should remain unchanged inthe foreseeable future. 6. Meteorological Data Temperatures inthe Pala Va! ley are relatively moderate, ranging from an average of around 55 °F during the winter months toan average of around 72.3 °F during the summer. In 2011 the total annual rainfall for the Pala area was approximately 9.7 inches with the wettest month beingRegards.Robert H. Smith Tribal Chairman
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael G. Carlton, the Chief Executive Officer of Crescent Financial Corporation, in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by Crescent Financial Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on
the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                        |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Carlton               
|                        |  |     |  | Michael G. Carlton                   
|                        |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ICG COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         103,288
<SECURITIES>                                    22,219
<RECEIVABLES>                                  168,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                    78,782
<INVENTORY>                                      2,199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               305,626
<PP&E>                                       1,805,378
<DEPRECIATION>                                 279,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,020,621
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          373,387
<BONDS>                                      1,905,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          519,323
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           478
<OTHER-SE>                                   (844,342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,020,621
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               479,226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               446,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                60,019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (404,540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (25)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (466,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  36,789
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                195,511
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (234,162)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.97)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
99.1





Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting of Wichita Falls, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months
ended September 30, 2001 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |    
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---
|                   
|Dated: May 28, 2003 |  |  |  | By:
|                    |  |  |  |    



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.