alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 14

- 00155

- CV

EX PARTE Wiley SMITH

Original Habeas Corp us Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 19, 2014

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DENIED AS MOOT

On March 6, 2014 , this court received relator’s pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus,

complaining relator was illegally confined after being found in contempt of court for failure to pay

previously ordered child support . However, on March 7, 2014

, this court received a copy of the

trial court’s “C onditional Release Order” signed on March 6, 2014 , ordering relator released from

jail and setting the matter for further hearing . Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corp us

is denied as moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding aris es out of Cause No. 1991

- EM 5

- 01082 , styled In the Interest of A.S.G., Child , pending in the 150 th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas , the Honorable Nick Catoe Jr. presiding.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.22

                 Amended Schedule of Meditrust Facility Leases
Which are Substantially Similar to the Facility Lease Attached as Exhibit 10.21







<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                                ORIGINAL
                                                                                LEASING        MEDITRUST                NO. OF UNITS
 FACILITY NAME                               LOCATION                    COMMITMENT FEE       INVESTMENT    BASE RENT   IN FACILITY
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                          <C>                         <C>                 <C>           <C>          <C>
Alterra Clare Bridge of Farmington Hills     Farmington Hills, Michigan       34,209.00      3,420,850.00   329,770.00      28

Alterra Clare Bridge of Farmington Hills     Farmington Hills, Michigan       37,510.00      3,750,992.00   361,596.00      28

Alterra Clare Bridge of Fort Myers           Fort Myers, Florida              37,655.00      3,765,481.00   362,922.00      32

Alterra Clare Bridge of Lower Makefield      Yardley, Pennsylvania            49,989.00      4,998,920.00   481,896.00      36

Alterra Clare Bridge of Tampa                Tampa, Florida                   37,655.00      3,765,481.00   362,992.00      32

Alterra Clare Bridge of Utica                Utica, Michigan                  33,546.00      3,354,614.00   323,385.00      28

Alterra Sterling House of Brown Deer         Brown Deer, Wisconsin             7,073.00        707,266.00    68,180.00      15

Alterra Sterling House of Onalaska           Onalaska, Wisconsin              12,899.00      1,289,931.00   124,349.00      19
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Adam Mauerberger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Atlantic Wine
Agencies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):


      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

<PAGE>

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 16, 2005

/s/ Adam Mauerberger
---------------------------
Name: Adam Mauerberger
Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 4,      2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |                               |                                       |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                         | PAPERWEIGHT      DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                         |                               |                                       |
| Dated:      November 6, 2009 |                               |                                       |
|                         | Name:                              | Thomas      J. Ferree                      |
|                         | Title:                             | Chief      Financial Officer and Treasurer |
KEITH ANDREW JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4518

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 4, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Keith Andrew Jackson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See, e.g., Hall v. State, 117 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) 

(dismissing appeal from order denying request for final disposition of violation of 

probation allegations and concluding that no other appellate or extraordinary 

remedy is available to appellant).

LEWIS, THOMAS, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 22, 2010

0114 

# Order

January 22, 2010

139397

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139397 COA: 283724 Cheboygan CC: 07-003645-FH GLENN EVAN SUNICH, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 25, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21.1   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


             State of
           Incorporation              Name of Subsidiary
           -------------              ------------------
           Kansas                     Sterling House Corporation
           Kansas                     BCI Construction, Inc.
           Delaware                   ALS-Crossings Co.
           Delaware                   ALS-Clare Bridge, Inc.
           Delaware                   ALS-Leasing, Inc.
           Delaware                   ALS-Stonefield, Inc.
           Delaware                   ALS-WovenHearts, Inc.
           Delaware                   ALS-WovenHearts Minnesota, Inc.
           Delaware                   ALS-Wynwood, Inc.
           Kansas                     Assisted Living Properties, Inc.
           Kansas                     Coventry Corporation
           Michigan                   ALS-Midwest, Inc.
           Washington                 Crossings International Corporation
           Wisconsin                  Heartland Retirement Services, Inc.
           Wisconsin                  Wovencare Systems, Inc.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. ALEX M A ZARIEGO-GOM EZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-50079

D.C . No. 3:14-c r-02294-LAB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia Larry A. B urns, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d April 13, 2016 ** B e fore : FARRIS, TALLM AN, a n d B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s. Ale x M a z arie go-Gom e z a ppe a l s from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 30-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for be ing a re m ove d a lie n found in the Unite d State s, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED APR 18 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).M a z arie g o-Gom e z c onte nds tha t the distric t c ourt e rre d

in a pply ing a 16- le ve l e nha

nc e m e nt unde r U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) be c a use his prior c onvic tion unde r C a lifornia Pe na l C ode § 211 is not a c rim e of viole nc e . This c la im is fore c lose d . S

e e Unite d State

s v . Be c e r ril-Lope z , 541 F.3d 881, 893 &

n.10 (9th C ir. 2008) (a

c onvic tion for robbe ry

unde r C a lifornia

Pe na l C ode § 211 is a c ate goric a l c rim e of viole nc e ). C ontra ry to M a z arie g o-Gom e z ’ s a sse rtion, De sc amps v . Unite d State

s , 133 S. C t. 2276 (2013), which c o nc e rns the m odifie d c ate goric a l a

pproa c h , doe s not a llow us to disre ga rd Be c e rril-Lope

z . Se eMille r v . Gammie , 335 F.3d 889, 893 (9th C ir. 2003) (e n ba nc ) (thre e -judge pa

n e l is bound by c i rc uit pre c e de nt unle ss tha t pre c e de nt is “ c le arly

irre c o nc ila

ble ” with inte rve ning higher a

uthority). B e c a use the distric t c ourt prope rly a pplie d a 16-le ve l e nha

nc e m e nt unde r U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii), wene e d not re a c h M a z arie go-Gom e z ’ s c onte ntion that his prior c onvic tion is not a n a ggrav ate d fe lony

for purpose s of a

n 8-le ve l e nha nc e m e nt unde r § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C ). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 5 0 0 7 9 2
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2199

To provide funding for the nutrition education and training program

authorized under the Child Nutrition Act of 1966, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 1996

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, and Mr. HEFLIN) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To provide funding for the nutrition education and training

program authorized under the Child Nutrition Act of

1966, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FUNDING FOR NUTRITION EDUCATION AND

4 TRAINING.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 19(i) of the Child Nutri6 tion Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1788(i)) is amended—

7 (1) in the first sentence of paragraph (2)(A), by

8 striking ‘‘and $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1996’’ and
2

•S 2199 IS

1 inserting ‘‘, $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1996, and

2 $7,500,000 for fiscal year 1997’’; and

3 (2) in paragraph (3)—

4 (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking

5 ‘‘1997’’ and inserting ‘‘1998’’; and

6 (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking

7 ‘‘1997’’ and inserting ‘‘1998’’.

8 (b) OFFSETTING REDUCTION IN EMERGENCY FOOD

9 ASSISTANCE ACT.—Notwithstanding section 27 of the

10 Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2036), the Secretary

11 of Agriculture shall purchase not more than $96,250,000

12 of commodities under section 27 of the Act for fiscal year

13 1997.

14 (c) OFFSETTING REDUCTION IN SCHOOL MEALS INI15 TIATIVE FOR HEALTHY CHILDREN.—Of the amounts

16 made available to carry out the National School Lunch

17 Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) and the Child Nutrition Act

18 of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) under the heading

19 ‘‘CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAMS’’ under the heading ‘‘DO20 MESTIC FOOD PROGRAMS’’ in title IV of the Agri21 culture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administra22 tion, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997 (110

23 Stat. 1589), not more than $6,250,000 may be used to

24 carry out the school meals initiative for healthy children

25 (60 Fed. Reg. 31188 (1995)). Of the funds made available
3

•S 2199 IS

1 to carry out the school meals initiative for healthy chil2 dren—

3 (1) not less than $800,000 shall be provided for

4 cooperative agreements between the Secretary of Ag5 riculture and the food service management institute

6 authorized under section 21(a)(2) of the National

7 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1769b–1(a)(2)); and

8 (2) not less than $4,000,000 shall be made

9 available to State applicants for food service training

10 grants to States provided to carry out the school

11 meals initiative for healthy children, except to the

12 extent that a lesser amount is sufficient to fully fund

13 all applications submitted by States.

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend15 ments made by this section shall be effective as of October

16 1, 1996.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         447,523
<SECURITIES>                                 9,389,690
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,876
<ALLOWANCES>                                    45,876
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,414,049
<PP&E>                                         845,317
<DEPRECIATION>                               (126,329)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,857,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,909,299
<BONDS>                                        555,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,672
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,386,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,393,228
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,353,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              77,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,895,149)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,895,149)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,895,149)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)
        

</TABLE>
Memorandum July 25, 2014

Subject: Wood Heater NSPS Conference Call with Central Boiler

From: Gregory Green, Director

Outreach and Information Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

To: Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

- 0734

Participants: Denni s Brazier

Mike Koerber Gregory Green

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the discussion between Dennis Brazier representing Central Boiler, and Tom Powers, Mike Koerber and Gregory Green. Mr. Brazier is the owner

o f Central Boiler, a manufacturer of hydronic heaters. He addressed five issues of concern to his company with the Wood Heater NSPS proposal . Because of the uncertainty surrounding the first three of these issues, his retailers have been reluctant to purcha se hydronic heaters from his company until
the Wood Heater NSPS is finalized and he urged the Agency to clarify its position on these issues immediately

.

1. Mr. Brazier recommended the NSPS extend certification (grandfather) to all units that have already b een manufactured and qualified for compliance with the EPA Hydronic Heater Voluntary Program, regardless of test method through the life of their qualification

. 2. Mr. Brazier also recommended that the NSPS allow the sale of all units manufactured prior to

pr omulgation of the final rule.

3. He also urged the Agency to clarify the test method that will be required in the final rule so testing laboratories can began testing with this method. Mr. Brazier felt that many manufacturers are not having new units tested u ntil they knew the method they would have to comply with meaning the laboratories were experiencing a significant loss in business.

4. Mr. Brazier felt that the Step 2 limit in the rule of 0.06 lb/mmbtu was not achievable and would force many manufacturers ou t of business. He also felt this limit was unnecessary as the current voluntary limi t of 0.32 lb/mmbtu resulted in very clean hydronic heaters.

5. Finally Mr. Brazier felt the cord wood test discussed in the Wood Heater NSPS proposal was too expensive and con fusing

, making it very difficult for manufacturers to comply with the final standard while providing no environmental benefit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                            0001108345
<NAME>                                    IMPRESO.COM, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000
<CURRENCY>                                              USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    FEB-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                              215,665
<SECURITIES>                                         11,088
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6,722,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                        203,170
<INVENTORY>                                      25,882,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 32,969,571
<PP&E>                                           17,410,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                    9,704,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   40,721,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            24,271,071
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             53,038
<OTHER-SE>                                       12,784,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     40,721,022
<SALES>                                          16,321,696
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16,321,696
<CGS>                                            14,148,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14,148,293
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (77,652)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    230,170
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  313,878
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     253,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                        115,048
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 138,423
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        138,423
<EPS-BASIC>                                             .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .03


</TABLE>