alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6775

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

KEVIN MYELL SLADE, 

Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Greenville. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (4:08-cr-00003-FL-1) 

Submitted: August 19, 2021 Decided: August 24, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kevin Myell Slade, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Kevin Myell Slade seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his motion to 

correct the presentence report and his sentence as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and 

dismissing it as successive and unauthorized. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief 

on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Slade has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 21

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                     |  |                                           
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                                   |  | State/Country ofIncorporation/Organization
|                                                     | 
|ICT Canada Marketing, Inc.                           |  | Canada                                    
|                                                     | 
|Eurotel Marketing Limited                            |  | Ireland                                   
|                                                     | 
|ICT Resources, Inc.                                  |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                     | 
|ICT Enterprises, Inc.                                |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                     | 
|ICT International, Inc.                              |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                     | 
|ICT Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.             |  | Delaware                                  
|                                                     | 
|ICT Australia Pty. Ltd.                              |  | Australia                                 
|                                                     | 
|ICT Financial Services Pty. Ltd.                     |  | Australia                                 
|                                                     | 
|ICT Barbados, Inc. (no operations)                   |  | Barbados                                  
|                                                     | 
|ICT Marketing Services of Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  | Mexico                                    
|                                                     | 
|ICT Marketing Services of Asia Pacific Pte. Ltd      |  | Singapore                                 
|                                                     | 
|ICT Marketing Services, Inc.                         |  | Philippines                               
|                                                     | 
|ICT Business Services of India Private Limited       |  | India                                     
|                                                     | 
|ICT Marketing Services of Costa Rica                 |  | Costa Rica                                
|                                                     | 
|ICT Services of Argentina S.A.                       |  | Argentina                                 
|                                                     | 
|ICT Group Netherlands B.V.                           |  | Netherlands                               
|                                                     | 
|ICT Group Netherlands Holding B.V.                   |  | Netherlands
#### Hollis LACY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28284.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 25, 1956.

*577No attorney on appeal- for appellant. •

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is the possession for the purpose of sale in a dry area of intoxicating liquor; the punishment, a fine of $100.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts dr bills of exception.’ All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed..
<PAGE>

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
Wachovia Bank National Association:

The Board of Directors
Universal Master Servicing, LLC:

We have examined managements' assertion, included in the accompanying report,
that Wachovia Bank National Association (the Bank as the Master Servicer for the
period from January 1, 2002 to October 10, 2002) and Universal Master Servicing,
LLC (UMS as the Sub-Master Servicer for the period from October 11, 2002 to
December 31, 2002) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers, except for minimum servicing standards I.4.,
II.1., II.2., II.3., II.4., III.2., III.3., III.4., V.2., V.3., V.4., and VI.1.,
which are performed by the their primary servicers, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2002. Management is responsible for the Bank's and UMS's compliance
with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements' assertion about the Bank's and UMS's compliance based on
our examination. We did not examine the respective primary servicers' compliance
with standards I.4., II.1., II.2., II.3., II.4., III.2., III.3., III.4., V.2.,
V.3., V.4., and VI.1. and, accordingly, do not express an opinion thereon.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's and
UMS's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards specified above
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for
our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Bank's and UMS's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, managements' assertion that the Bank and UMS have complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects.



/s/ KPMG LLP
March 28, 2003
Daikin AC (Americas), Inc.

1645 Wallace Drive, Suite 110

Carrollton, TX 75006 USA TEL: 866

- 4DAIKIN

FAX: 972

- 245

- 1038

www.daikinac.com

March 13 , 2013

Rebecca von dem Hagen Dave Godwin

Alternatives & Emissions Reduction Branch Alternatives & Emissions Reduction Branch

Stratospheric Protection Division Stratospheric Protection Division

Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Protection Agency

1310 L Street, NW 1310 L Street, NW

10 th Floor (MC 6205J) 10 th Floor (MC 6205J)

Washington, DC 20005 Washington, DC 20005

RE: Supplemental Information in Response to EPA Questions Regarding

Daikin U.S. Corporation’s Pending SN AP Petition for

HFC

- 32 in Residential and Light Commercial Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps

VIA EMAI L

Dear Ms. von dem Hagen and Mr. Godwin:

Daikin U.S. Corporation (Daikin) is providing the following supplemental information in

response to the Envir onmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) questions asked on March 1, 2013,

regarding Daikin’s pending Significant New Alternatives Program (SNAP) petition for HFC

- 32

(R32) in (1) household and light commercial air conditioning (new uses only), and (2) residentia l

air conditioning and heat pumps (new uses only).

EPA requested that Daikin provide a list of the technologies (applications) within the scope of

UL 484 for which Daikin is requesting approval, along with the typical charge sizes for these

applications. In response to EPA’s request, Daikin provides the following information:

• Packaged terminal air conditioners (charge sizes up to 8.5 kilograms (kg), and th e typical

charge size range is 0.5 to 1.05 kg)

• Packaged terminal heat pumps (charge sizes up to 8.5 kg, and the typical charge size

range is 0.5 to 1.05 kg)

Please let me know if you have any more questions or if you require any more information.

Sincerely,

Mark V. Stanga

for Daikin U.S. Corporation

cc: SNAP Document Control Officer

U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation, 6205J

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.

Washington, DC 20460
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2125 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2125

To provide a sentence of death for certain importations of significant 
                  quantities of controlled substances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 1996

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide a sentence of death for certain importations of significant 
                  quantities of controlled substances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drug Importer Death Penalty Act of 
1996''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR INTERNATIONAL DRUG TRAFFICKING.

    Section 1010 of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 
U.S.C. 960) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court 
shall sentence a person convicted of a violation of subsection (a), 
consisting of bringing into the United States a mixture or substance--
            ``(A) which is described in subsection (b)(1); and
            ``(B) in an amount the Attorney General by rule has 
        determined is equal to 100 usual dosage amounts of such mixture 
        or substance;
to imprisonment for life without possibility of release. If the 
defendant has violated this subsection on more than one occasion and 
the requirements of chapter 228 of title 18, United States Code, are 
satisfied, the court shall sentence the defendant to death.
    ``(2) The maximum fine that otherwise may be imposed, but for this 
subsection, shall not be reduced by operation of this subsection.''

SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE.

    (a) Inclusion of Offense.--Section 3591(b) of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (1);
            (2) by striking the comma at the end of paragraph (2) and 
        inserting ``; or'' at the end of paragraph (2); and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) an offense described in section 1010(e)(1) of the 
        Controlled Substances Import and Export Act;''
    (b) Additional Aggravating Factor.--Section 3592(d) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (8) the 
following:
            ``(9) Second Importation Offense.--The offense consisted of 
        a second or subsequent violation of section 1010(a) of the 
        Controlled Substances Import and Export Act consisting of 
        bringing a controlled substance into the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm Consent**

 

 

TheBoard of Directors

MaximPharmaceuticals, Inc.:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. (333-101302,333-85216, 333-61154, 333-34398, 333-45600, 333-11375, 333-35669, 333-47695 and333-113326) on Form S-8 and Registration Statement Nos. (333-65011, 333-52403,333-84711, 333-91923, 333-95293, 333-30906, 333-41442, 333-109479, 333-111601and 333-118434) on Form S-3 of Maxim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (a developmentstage company) of our reports dated December 12, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Maxim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as of September 30,2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations andcomprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the yearsin the three-year period ended September 30, 2005, and for the period frominception (October 23, 1989) through September 30, 2005, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof September 30, 2005, and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of September 30, 2005, which reports appear in the September 30,2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Maxim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 
|                   | /s/  KPMG LLP |   |
|------------------------|---------------|--------|
|                   |
|                   |
| San Diego, California  |
| December 14, 2005 |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1
 
 Investor Contact:
    
    Press Contacts:Frank Yoshino
    
    Katherine LaneVice President, Finance
    
    Manager, Public Relations(714) 885-3697
    
    (714) 885-3828George Sard/Andrew Cole/Diane HenrySard Verbinnen & Co(212) 687-8080 or (415) 618-8750
 EMULEX CONFIRMS RECEIPT OF UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL
 COSTA MESA, Calif., April 21, 2009
 About Emulex
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
                            USCS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
                      (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED   TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                            DECEMBER 31,          DECEMBER 31,
                                                                        --------------------  --------------------
                                                                          1997       1996       1997       1996
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                                                     <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
 period...............................................................     23,118     23,060     23,164     21,178
Common stock equivalents considered to be outstanding for the periods
 presented............................................................        803        979      1,039        897
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                           23,921     24,039     24,203     22,075
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
                                                                        ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income............................................................  $   6,014  $   4,775  $  22,460  $  14,509
Earnings per share:
  Basic...............................................................      $0.26      $0.21      $0.97      $0.69
  Diluted.............................................................      $0.25      $0.20      $0.93      $0.66
</TABLE>
 
Note: Earnings per share calculations have been restated to reflect application
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 "Earnings per Share" and
the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 98.
 
                                       48
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael P. Gray, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 30, 2007



/s/ MICHAEL P. GRAYMichael P. GrayChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief
executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information
contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John CaldwellJohn CaldwellPresident and Chief Executive Officer




Date: May 18, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

             CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Plan, 1996 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the Non-Qualified Stock Opinion
Agreements of Alysis Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 27, 2000
with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Alysis Technologies,
Inc. in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Walnut Creek, California
March 28, 2000
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned
Principal Financial Officer of McKenzie Bay International, Ltd.  (the
"Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly
Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company  for  the  quarter ended June 30, 2005
2005  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in
the  Report  fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 17, 2005

/s/ Gregory N. Bakeman
----------------------
Gregory N. Bakeman
Principal Financial Officer
### Petition for Exemption

Bob Noll, Chief Creative Officer Boston Productions, Inc. 290 Vanderbilt Avenue, Suite 1 Norwood, MA 02062 781
- 255
- 1555 AND Jo Throckmorton, President Blue Ace Media, LLC 2825 Blue Slopes Drive Bloomington, IN 47408 317
- 374
- 8802 jo@blueacemedia.com **First Name:** Jo **Last Name:** Throckmorton **Mailing A ddress:**  2825 Blue Slopes Drive **City:** Bloomington **Country:** United States **ZIP/Postal Code:** 47408 **Organization Name:** Boston Productions, Inc. **Submitter's Representative:** Jo Throckmorton **Government A gency** 

**Type:** Federal **Government A gency**  **:** NPS 

### Boston Productions, Inc. on behalf of the National Park Service is requesting an UAS exemption for aerial photography for the Minuteman Missile National Historic Site. The aerials will be taped on or about the days of September 21, 22 and 23, 2015. The UAS will fly BELOW 200 FEET at all times. The aircraft weight is 15 pounds. Operations will be conducted during daytime VFR conditions and within line of sight (VLOS) of the pilot. We will be out of r ange of any airports or heliports. The location of tapings are Philip, South Dakota, and Stamford, South Dakota.