alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terax Energy, Inc.
  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006, as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  I, Lawrence Finn, Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Terax Energy, Inc. and will be retained by Terax Energy, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



/s/ Lawrence J. Finn
  Lawrence J. Finn 
  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) 
  and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

November 20, 2006

---
Exhibit 13.1



Compañía de Minas Buenaventura
S.A.A.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



| | 1. | I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the “Company”).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | (A)          The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2013 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| |    | (B)          The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
                                                       condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                





Dated:   April 30, 2014



| | /s/ Roque Benavides Ganoza
| | --------------------------
| | Roque Benavides Ganoza    
| | Chief Executive Officer
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION

STATE OFARIZONA COUNTY OFMARICOPA Kelly Howard, being first duly sworn, upon oath deposes and says: That he is a legal advertisingrepresentative of the Arizona Business Gazette, a newspaper of general circulation in the county of Maricopa, State of Arizona, published at Phoenix, Arizona,by Phoenix Newspapers Inc., which also publishes The Arizona Republic, and that the copy hereto attached is a true copy of the advertisement published in the said paper on the dates as indicated. TheArizona Republic
May 26,2006

Sworn to before methis May A.D. 2006
Exhibit 32.2



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company),
hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC. 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: November 7, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    Dale E. Parker
|                        |  |  |  |                      
|                        |  |  |  |                      
|                        |  |  |  |                      



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 293

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the payment to States

of per diem for veterans receiving adult day health care, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 30, 1995

Mr. CONRAD (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. PELL, Mr.

AKAKA, Mr. JEFFORDS, and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the

payment to States of per diem for veterans receiving

adult day health care, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAYMENT TO STATES OF PER DIEM FOR VET4 ERANS RECEIVING ADULT DAY HEALTH

5 CARE.

6 (a) PAYMENT OF PER DIEM FOR VETERANS RECEIV7 ING ADULT DAY CARE.—Section 1741 of title 38, United

8 States Code, is amended—

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(a)’’;
2

•S 293 IS

1 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as

2 subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; and

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new

4 paragraph (2):

5 ‘‘(2) The Secretary may pay each State per diem at

6 a rate determined by the Secretary for each veteran receiv7 ing adult day health care in a State home, if such veteran

8 is eligible for such care under laws administered by the

9 Secretary.’’.

10 (b) ASSISTANCE TO STATES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF

11 ADULT DAY CARE FACILITIES.—(1) Section 8131(3) of

12 title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting

13 ‘‘adult day health,’’ before ‘‘or hospital care’’.

14 (2) Section 8132 of such title is amended by inserting

15 ‘‘adult day health,’’ before ‘‘or hospital care’’.

16 (3) Section 8135(b) of such title is amended—

17 (A) in paragraph (2)(C), by inserting ‘‘or adult

18 day health care facilities’’ after ‘‘domiciliary beds’’;

19 and

20 (B) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting ‘‘or con21 struction (other than new construction) of adult day

22 health care buildings’’ before the semicolon.

Æ
Jace:

First, OTM 28 is essentially the same as the proposed revisi on to Method 202 and any concerns over the procedures in OTM 28 would also apply to the proposed m ethod. We hope to address any issues with the future application of Method 202 prior to promulgating the method rather than having to address the issues after the method is promulgated and there is the potential for multiple interpretations and controversy. So if there are concerns over the intent or the wording, I would suggest that you formulate a comment and recommendation to

submit to the docket.

The reason that we used the Method 23 condenser was th at it was a readily available piece of glassware that accomplished the objective of cooling the sample gas quickly w ithout undue mixing of the sample gas and the condensed water. The most important aspect is that the temperature achieved at the drop out impinger (or f lask) is at or near the temperature required at the exit of the back up filter. Achieving this will result in alm ost all of the liquid water being in the drop out impinger and tha t the second impinger will be a "finishing" step with little water such that the back up impinger does not collect a lot lot of water droplets (with the potential of becoming bli nded by this water). If you disagree with our reasoning or you think that the current wording of the proposed m ethod,

please submit a comment to the docket.

_________________________________ Ron Myers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policy and Programs Division Monitoring Policy Group, D243-05

RTP NC 27711

Tel. 919.541.5407

Fax 919.541.1039
E-mail myers.ron@epa.gov

Mr. Myers,

I need clarification regarding the condenser for OTM 2 8. Is it required to use a Method 23 coil type condenser or can a straight condenser be used? Your assistance would be appreciated.

Thank You,



## Jace Shively

Field Team Leader I Avogadro Environmental Corp.
1350 Sullivan Trail, Suite A

Easton, PA 18040
Office: 610-559-8776, ext. 120

Fax: 610-559-8913
www.avogadro.net "Jace Shively" <jshively@avogadro.net>

05/15/2009 02:42 PM To Ron Myers/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject Otm 28 

### Page 1 of 1

8/26/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settings\KFaught\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpw ise\4C76541FDo

...
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                             |                          |   |
| Dated:  August 9, 2010 |                          | /s/ Mark R. Richards  |
|                             | Name:                         | Mark R. Richards |
|                             | Title:                        | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 34 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 34

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat geological, 
  geophysical, and surface casing costs like intangible drilling and 
               development costs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 4, 1995

  Mr. Breaux (for himself and Mr. Johnston) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat geological, 
  geophysical, and surface casing costs like intangible drilling and 
               development costs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GEOLOGICAL, GEOPHYSICAL, AND SURFACE CASING COSTS TREATED 
              LIKE INTANGIBLE DRILLING AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 263 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to intangible drilling and development 
costs in the case of oil and gas wells and geothermal wells) is amended 
by inserting before the last sentence the following new sentence: ``In 
the case of oil and gas wells, the tax treatment which applies to the 
taxpayer's intangible drilling and development costs shall also apply 
to surface casing costs and to geological and geophysical costs for the 
purpose of ascertaining the existence, location, extent, or quality of 
any deposit of oil or gas within the United States (within the meaning 
of section 638(1)) or a possession of the United States (within the 
meaning of section 638(2)).''
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subparagraph (B) of section 57(a)(2) of 
such Code is amended by adding at the end the following new flush 
sentence:
                ``For purposes of clause (i), the term `intangible 
                drilling and development costs' includes surface casing 
                costs and geological and geophysical costs described in 
                section 263(c).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to costs paid or incurred after the date of the enactment of this 
Act in taxable years ending after such date.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
O. Hatler, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Gerald O. Hatler

Gerald O. Hatler
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003

                                      -25-
VI

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 221

For the relief of Maria Eduarda Lorenzo.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 12 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Maria Eduarda Lorenzo.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That, for the purposes of the Immigration and Nationality

4 Act, Maria Eduarda Lorenzo shall be held and considered

5 to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for

6 permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of

7 this Act, upon payment of the required visa fee. Upon the

8 granting of permanent residence to such alien as provided

9 for in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the

10 proper officer to reduce by one number, during the current

11 fiscal year or the fiscal year next following, the total num12 ber of immigrant visas and conditional entries which are
2

S 221 IS

1 made available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth

2 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

3 Act or, if applicable, from the total number of such visas

4 and entries which are made available to such natives under

5 section 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE 

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498 

 OFFICE OF 

 AIR AND RADIATION 

August 17, 2012 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with NADA and Penske Automotive Group to discuss the EPA/NHTSA 

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017-

2025 Light-Duty Vehicles 

FROM: William Charmley, US EPA 

 

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

This memo documents a meeting held on June 18, 2012 between representatives of the National 

Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), Penske Automotive, and EPA to discuss the 

EPA/NHTSA Joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards 

for Model Year 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles. This meeting took place in Washington, D.C. 

The meeting attendees included Phil Brady, President of NADA, and Roger Penske, Chief 

Executive Officer of Penske Automotive Group, and Margo Oge, Director of EPA’s Office of 

Transportation and Air Quality. 

During this meeting NADA and Penske Automotive discussed a number of the issues contained 

in the NADA written comment on the NPRM. In addition, the topic of the mid-term review 

proposed in the NPRM was discussed. Mr. Brady and Mr. Penske indicated they would 

consider sending supplemental comments regarding the NPRM specifically with respect to the 

mid-term review.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 404

To consolidate the administration of defense economic conversion activities

in the Executive Office of the President.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 14 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To consolidate the administration of defense economic

conversion activities in the Executive Office of the President.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CONSOLIDATION OF ADMINISTRATION OF DE4 FENSE ECONOMIC CONVERSION ACTIVITIES

5 IN THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESI6 DENT.

7 (a) CONSOLIDATION OF PROGRAMS.—The President

8 shall consolidate within, and coordinate through, the Exec9 utive Office of the President all defense conversion, rein-
2

•S 404 IS

1 vestment, and transition assistance programs of the De2 partment of Defense.

3 (b) ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL ASSISTANT.—(1)

4 For a five-year period beginning on the date of the enact5 ment of this Act, there is established in the Executive Of6 fice of the President a Special Assistant to the President

7 for Economic and Defense Conversion who shall be re8 sponsible for coordinating all defense conversion, reinvest9 ment, and transition assistance programs. The Special As10 sistant shall also be a member of the National Economic

11 Council in the Executive Office of the President.

12 (2) The Special Assistant for Economic and Defense

13 Conversion shall have the authority to bring interagency

14 disputes regarding defense conversion, reinvestment, and

15 transition assistance programs directly to the President

16 for resolution based on the recommendations of the Spe17 cial Assistant.

18 (c) TRANSFER OF OFFICE OF ECONOMIC ADJUST19 MENT.—During such period, the Secretary of Defense

20 shall transfer the Office of Economic Adjustment of the

21 Department of Defense to the jurisdiction of the National

22 Economic Council in the Executive Office of the President.

23 (d) TRANSFER OF ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS

24 AGENCY.—During such period, the Secretary of Defense

25 shall transfer the Advanced Research Projects Agency of
3

•S 404 IS

1 the Department of Defense to the jurisdiction of the Na2 tional Economic Council in the Executive Office of the

3 President.

4 (e) TRANSFER OF ECONOMIC CONVERSION INFORMA5 TION EXCHANGE.—During such period, the Secretary of

6 Commerce shall transfer the Economic Conversion Infor7 mation Exchange of the Department of Commerce to the

8 jurisdiction of the National Economic Council in the Exec9 utive Office of the President.

10 (f) TIME FOR TRANSFERS.—The transfers required

11 by subsections (c) and (d) shall be made not later than

12 60 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

R. Wayne Johnson, Appellant

No. 06-24-00006-CV v.

Robert Ramirez, et al., Appellees

Appeal from the 62nd District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 92217). 

Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and 

Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

van Cleef. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, R. Wayne Johnson, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 25, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
SERVED JANUARY 11, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^^ I OfjHmsPOirr;^iQ^,i 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ' " 3 

WASHINGTON, DC _ 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DARBY AVIATION, 

Respondent. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP08SO0026 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2008-1192 

HEARING NOTICE 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing in this case will be held on January 28, 

2010, beginning at 10:00 a.m., local time at the following location: 

Birmingham Social Security Center 

1200 Rev. Abraham Woods, Jr. Blvd. Room 9 

(formerly 8* Ave. N) 

Birmingham, AL 35285 

Allow time to pass through security and note that cameras, including cellular 

telephones incorporating cameras, are not allowed in federal courthouses. 

Isaac D. Benkin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment-Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP08SO0026 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

UPDATED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-43 0 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Deanna L. Weidner, Respondent's Counsel 

Anderson & Associates, LLC 

505 20th Street North 

Financial Center, Suite 1450 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

TEL: 205-324-1230 

FAX: 205-322-3890 

E-MAIL: dlweidner@davidbandersonlaw.com 

Raymond Veatch, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-9676 

E-MAIL: Raymond.Veatch@faa.gov 

The Honorable Isaac D. Benkin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

E-MAIL: David.Benkin@dot.gov 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-^30.
Order filed March 23, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-14-00231-CR

____________

NELSON OKWOLISA ILODIGUWE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1361714

ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State’s Exhibit 23 and 

State’s Exhibit 24.

The exhibit clerk of the 248th District Court is directed to deliver to the 

Clerk of this court the original of State’s Exhibit 23 and State’s Exhibit 24, on or 

before April 2, 2015. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and 

keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their 

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State’s 

Exhibit 23 and State’s Exhibit 24, to the clerk of the 248th District Court.

PER CURIAM