alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Adjustment/Amendment No. 2 to Management Agreement


This Adjustment/Amendment No. 2 is made on this 12th day of October, 2002 to the
MANAGEMENT  AGREEMENT  ("Agreement")  of March,  2001,  by and  between  CENTURY
CASINOS, INC., a Delaware corporation  ("Company"),  and FOCUS CASINO CONSULTING
AG, a Swiss corporation ("Consultant").

A) Adjustment/Amendment to Article 3.1:

The Company and the  Consultant  hereby agree to replace the US Dollar amount of
$100,000,  as mentioned in the fourth line of this Article,  by US Dollar amount
of $120,000, so that this Article reads as follows:

"As annual  compensation for the services rendered by Consultant for the Company
pursuant to this Agreement, Consultant shall be paid not less than the following
base annual management fee, on a monthly basis, during the term hereof: $120,000
(onehundredandtwentythousand), plus annual increases and bonuses, and such other
incentives,  benefits,  and  compensation  as may be awarded to him from time to
time by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company."

B) Adjustment/Amendment to Article 5.3 (a) (ii):

The Company and  Consultant  hereby agree to insert words "any of the following"
after the words  "...used  herein  shall mean",  so that this  Article  reads as
follows:

" "Change of Control" as used herein  shall mean any of the  following:  (a) any
person or entity (not  affiliated  with the Consultant or Mr. Peter  Hoetzinger)
becoming  the  beneficial  owner  of a  majority  of the  voting  rights  of the
Company's  then  outstanding  securities;  (b) the triggering of the issuance of
stock rights to Shareholders  pursuant to the Company's Stock Rights  Agreement,
as amended from time to time; (c) the replacement  during any two calendar years
of half or more of the  existing  Board of  Directors  of the  Company;  (d) the
replacement,  or  rejection  (i.e.  through  a  proxy  fight),  of one  or  more
person(s),  nominated  to be  Director(s)  by the  Company's  Board of Directors
before any Change of Control;  (e) Mr. Erwin Haitzmann is no longer Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, unless because of his death or permanent
disability;   (f)  holders  of  the  Company's   securities  approve  a  merger,
consolidation or liquidation of the Company."

Agreed to and accepted by:

CENTURY CASINOS, INC.,                     FOCUS CASINO CONSULTING AG,
A Delaware Corporation                     a Swiss Corporation



     /s/ Erwin Haitzmann                        /s/ Werner Stocker
By: _______________________               By:  _____________________
     Chairman, Compensation Committee          Chairman of the Board


     /s/  Dinah Corbaci
By: _______________________
     Member, Compensation Committee
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2085 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2085

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 1996

              Referred to the Committee on House Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Capital Guide Service to accept voluntary services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    That section 441 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1970 (40 
U.S.C. 851) is amended by striking subsection (j) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(j)(1) Notwithstanding section 1342 of title 31, United States 
Code, the Capitol Guide Service is authorized to accept voluntary 
personal services.
    ``(2) No person shall be permitted to donate personal services 
under this subsection unless the person has first agreed, in writing, 
to waive any claim against the United States arising out of or in 
connection with such services, other than a claim under chapter 81 of 
title 5, United States Code.
    ``(3) No person donating personal services under this section shall 
be considered an employee of the United States for any purpose other 
than for purposes of chapter 81 of title 5, United States Code.
    ``(4) In no case shall the acceptance of personal services under 
this section result in the reduction of pay or displacement of any 
employee of the Capitol Guide Service.''.

            Passed the Senate September 17, 1996.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
II

Calendar No. 52

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 349

[Report No. 104–29]

To reauthorize appropriations for the Navajo-Hopi Relocation Housing

Program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 2 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. KYL) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

APRIL 6 (legislative day, APRIL 5), 1995

Reported by Mr. MCCAIN, without amendment

A BILL

To reauthorize appropriations for the Navajo-Hopi

Relocation Housing Program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 349 RS

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR

2 THE NAVAJO-HOPI RELOCATION HOUSING

3 PROGRAM.

4 Section 25(a)(8) of Public Law 93–531 (25 U.S.C.

5 640d–24(a)(8)) is amended by striking ‘‘1989,’’ and all

6 that follows through ‘‘and 1995.’’ and inserting ‘‘1995,

7 1996, and 1997.’’.

Calendar No. 52

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 349

[Report No. 104–29]

A BILL

To reauthorize appropriations for the Navajo-Hopi

Relocation Housing Program.

APRIL 6 (legislative day, APRIL 5), 1995

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Entertainment  Is Us, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Gary Stewart,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to  Entertainment  Is Us, Inc. and will be retained by Entertainment Is
Us, Inc. and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.

February 21, 2006



                            /s/  Gary Stewart
                            -----------------
                            Gary Stewart
                            Chief Financial Officer
VI

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 336

For the relief of John T. Monk.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 2 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

For the relief of John T. Monk.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RELIEF.

4 (a) TERMINATION OF PREMIUM PAYMENTS.—(1)

5 Notwithstanding any provision of subchapter I of chapter

6 19 of title 38, United States Code, John T. Monk of Jack7 son, Mississippi, may not be required to make premium

8 payments after the date of the enactment of this Act for

9 the National Service Life Insurance insurance policy for

10 which such individual was making monthly premium pay11 ments before such date.
2

•S 336 IS

1 (2) The termination of the requirement for premium

2 payments under paragraph (1) shall not terminate or oth3 erwise affect the coverage of John T. Monk of Jackson,

4 Mississippi, under the insurance policy referred to in such

5 paragraph.

6 (b) REFUND.—Notwithstanding any other provision

7 of law, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with

8 the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, shall pay to John T.

9 Monk of Jackson, Mississippi, out of any sums in the

10 Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the amount equal to

11 the excess of—

12 (1) the aggregate amount of the monthly pre13 mium payments made by John T. Monk of Jackson,

14 Mississippi, for the National Service Life Insurance

15 insurance policy referred to in subsection (a)(1),

16 over

17 (2) the amount of the insurance provided for

18 under that insurance policy.

Æ
---

EXHIBIT 10

Consent of AMEC Americas Limited

AMEC Americas Limited hereby consents to the use of its name in
connection with the following report and document, which is being filed as an
exhibit to and incorporated by reference into the annual report on Form 40-F of
Viceroy Exploration Ltd. ("the Company") being filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission::

|1. | The annual information form dated March 21, 2006 for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, which includes reference to AMEC
      Americas Limited in connection with information relating to the Gualcamayo
      Project.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 27thday
of March, 2006.

AMEC Americas Limited

|Per: | Signed                                   | 
|---- | ---------------------------------------- | 
|     | Steve Toevs, Vice President              | 
|     | on behalf of AMEC Americas
      Limited | 

---
### INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT P-14-0042 Focus Ready Draft 12/30/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ JAS PV (kg/yr):

Revision Notes/Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: N o LABEL : N o

CRSS: (12/19/2013): Chemical Name:

S-H2O: Dispersible g/L @ VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ MW: Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use :
SAT (concerns): (12 / 20/2013):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Analogs: Migration to groundwater: Other (please specify) PBT rating: P 3 B 3 T 1 // PMN: P3B1T1 // Deg Pdt: P3B3T1. Health: Eco:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING :

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS : Generated by the 09/30/2013 version of ChemSTEER.POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS :

P2 REC:P-14-0042

Manufacturing

Number of Sites/Location:

Basis: Process Description:



## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Conservative : to: from:



## RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Dermal:

High End: Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure: Basis:P-14-0042

Processing:

Number of Sites/Location:

Basis: Process Description:



## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

RA Boiler and Industrial Furnace Rule , which requires a minimum of 99.99% combustion efficiency.

Conservative: to: from:



## RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Dermal:

High End: Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure: Basis:P-14-0042

Use

Number of Sites/Location:

Basis:
Process Description:



## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Output 2: to : from: basis:



## RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Dermal:

High End: Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure: Basis:P-14-0042

Use

Number of Sites/Location:

Basis:

Process Description:



## ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Output 2: to : from: basis:



## RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis:

Dermal:

High End: Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure: Basis:
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.9


SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
(Effective March 2017)


Cash Compensation
Directors of Kadant Inc. (the “company”) who are not employees are paid the following fees for serving on our board of directors:
		
	•
	An annual retainer of $50,000.


		
	•
	An additional annual retainer for our non-executive chairman of the board of $60,000. 


		
	•
	An additional annual retainer for chairmen of the following committees: 


		
	▪
	audit committee - $10,000; 


		
	▪
	compensation committee - $7,500; 


		
	▪
	nominating and corporate governance committee - $5,000; and 


		
	▪
	risk oversight committee - $5,000.


		
	•
	Reimbursement of out-of pocket expenses incurred in attending or participating in meetings of our board of directors or its committees.




We do not provide any meeting fees to our directors for their board service. All annual retainers are paid in equal monthly installments.
Restricted Stock Units
Each of our non-employee directors also receives an annual award of 3,000 stock-settled restricted stock units (“RSUs”) (decreased from 5,000 RSUs in previous years), distributable in shares of common stock upon vesting.  The RSUs vest in four equal installments on the last day of each of the company’s fiscal quarters during the year. 
All awards are made under our company’s stockholder-approved equity incentive plans. The vesting of all awards accelerates in the event of a change in control of our company. Any awards, to the extent not previously vested, are forfeited if the recipient is no longer a member of our board of directors on the vesting dates for any reason other than a change-in-control of the company. The terms and conditions governing these awards are stated in the form of restricted stock unit award agreement for non-employee directors filed as exhibits to the company’s annual report on Form 10-K.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
Under our stock ownership guidelines adopted in March 2011, our directors are required to hold shares of our company’s common stock equivalent in value to three times their annual cash retainer. Compliance with the guidelines is measured annually following the close of the fiscal year, and directors have five years from the later of adoption of our stock ownership guidelines or their appointment as a director to attain compliance.
FILED INCOURT OF APPEALS

12tfi Court of Appeals District

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

\U

FILE COPY

10/13/2015

WALKER, WILBERT Tr. Ct. No. 12CR-115

COANo. 12-13-00333-CR

PD-0592-15

Pursuant to Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P., the record is returned to the court of appeals.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 7, 2008
 EMULEX CORPORATION
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    001-31353
    
    51-0300558(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code:
 
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02. Results of Operation and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATUREExhibit IndexEXHIBIT 99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02. Results of Operation and Financial Condition
    
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
  Exhibit Number
    
    Exhibit Title or Description99.01
    
    Press release of Emulex Corporation dated August 7, 2008
(furnished pursuant to Item 2.02)




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  EMULEX CORPORATION
(Registrant)Date: August 7, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ JAMES M. MCCLUNEYJames M. McCluney,Chief
Executive Officer and President




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit Number
    
    Exhibit Title or Description99.01
    
    Press release of Emulex Corporation dated August 7, 2008
(furnished pursuant to Item 2.02)
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert O. Carr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Thiscertification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever. 

Date: May 7, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K
for the year ended August 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, H. Michael Krimbill, President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2006



/s/ H. Michael KrimbillH. Michael KrimbillPresident and Chief Financial Officer


*A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to
and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
PM10 as Surrogate for PM2.5 Policy: EPA Request for Clarification

Domenico Mastrangelo to: Bachman, Tom A. 03/02/2010 01:02 PM

Cc: Monica Morales, Steve Odendahl

From: Domenico Mastrangelo/R8/USEPA/US

To: "Bachman, Tom A." <tbachman@nd.gov>

Cc: Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve Odendahl/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

Tom,

Please disregard the earlier email regarding EPA's request for clarification of North Dakota's approach to 

the referenced policy. Below is language that would closely represent EPA's position.

As discussed earlier today, this is to request that the North Dakota Air Quality Division clarify its position 

on the use of PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5, which North Dakota is committed to implement, as stated in 

its Interstate Transport SIP submitted to EPA on April 6, 2009. 

Since EPA first issued the August 15, 2006 Guidance on the Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) requirements, EPA 

has developed its interpretation of federal case law on use of surrogates, as reflected by 1) the EPA 

Administrator’s Title V order, In the Matter of: Louisville Gas & Electric Co., Petition No. IV-2008-3 (Adm’r 

Aug. 12, 2009) (order on petition); and 2) EPA's proposal for an early end to the surrogate policy in states 

with an approved PSD program in their SIP (75 FR 6827, Feb. 11, 2010). One option would be a North 

Dakota Air Quality Division response along these lines, which is consistent with the interpretations 

referenced above: 

We are writing in response to EPA’s request for clarification of our interpretation of the North 

Dakota Interstate Transport SIP. In particular, you requested that we clarify the reference to the 

State’s application of EPA’s interim guidance on use of PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5. Until that 

guidance has been ended or replaced, North Dakota intends to apply it consistent with EPA’s 

interpretation of how the federal case law is relevant to the use of the PM10 Surrogate Policy, see, 

e.g., 75 Fed. Reg. 6827, 6831-32 (Feb. 11, 2010). As part of that, North Dakota will require that the 

permit record for each application seeking to rely on the Surrogate Policy provide an adequate 

rationale to support the use of PM10 as a surrogate for PM2.5 under the facts and circumstances of 

the specific permit at issue, and not proceed on a general presumption that PM10 is always a 

reasonable surrogate for PM2.5. Further, North Dakota will be mindful of the limits provided in the 

policy itself, such as the need to identify the technical difficulties that justify the application of the 

policy in each specific case. See 75 Fed. Reg. at 6834.

We truly appreciate the Air Quality Division's willingness to consider and respond to our request within as 

short a time frame as possible.

Thank you, and please let me know if there are any questions/issues you wish to discuss. 

Domenico

___________________________________________

Domenico Mastrangelo

Air Quality Planning Unit

EPA Region 8 Air Program (8P-AR)

1595 Wynkoop

Denver, CO 80202-1129

303-312-6436 (voice); 303-312-6064 (fax); 

mastrangelo.domenico@epa.gov/

___________________________________________