alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael P. Gray, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 28, 2008



/s/ MICHAEL P. GRAYMichael P. GrayChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         February 8, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 180 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-176, CP2024-182.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-02534 Filed 2-7-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18            U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS            ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In            connection with the Annual Report of Norwood Financial Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K            for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange            Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, William W. Davis, Jr., President and            Chief Executive Officer, and Lewis J. Critelli, Executive Vice President and Chief            Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to            Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)        The Report fully            complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act            of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information            contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial            condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

|  

/s/ William W. Davis, Jr.     |  

                              |  

/s/ Lewis J. Critelli                                  |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| William W. Davis, Jr.                 |                                       | Lewis J. Critelli                                              |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |                                       | Executive Vice President, Secretary andChief Financial Officer |
|                                  |                                       |                                                           |

 

 

March 14, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41063

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN JOSE ROBLES-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-78-ALL 

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Jose Robles-Rodriguez (Robles) appeals his guilty-plea

conviction and sentence for being an alien found unlawfully in

the United States after deportation. Robles argues that the

“felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional. 

Robles’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Robles contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule
No. 05-41063

-2-

Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the

basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States

v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,

126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Robles properly concedes that his

argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit

precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further

review.

AFFIRMED.
# OAR Box 1490 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 49 ) IV-C-2

2 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/4/200811:51:47

AM Sheet 49of 273 P. 1P. 2 

### A-9A-5 2 IV-C-2 2 Keit h Barnett 03/26/200 2 10:0 9 A M To : Joh n Schweitze r<jschwtzr@gte.net > Subject : Re : centrifuga l casting ^ Thi s look s reasonabl e t o me . W e wil l d o alittl e researc h o n thi s en d t o confir m th e emissio n factor s se e wha tchange s w e migh tnee d t o mak e t o th e rule . Keit h W . Barnet tj ~ ~ US/EPAOAQPS , ESD/MIC G C504-0 5 ' Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 919-541-560 5 barnett . keith@epa
. go v Joh n Schweitze r<jschwtzr@gte.net > EP AAI R DOCKE

T Joh n Schweitze r < jschwtzr@gte.ne t> 03/26/200 2 09:1 9 A M Pleas e respon d t o Joh n Schweitze r To : Keit h Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EP A cc : Subject : centrifuga l castin g

Keith , I' m goin g t o posfthj s notic e (below ) o n ou rUE F website . Th e factor s fo rcentrifuga l castih g i n Tabl e 1 i n th e MAC Trul e shoul d hav e th e sam e notation . 'Th e UE Ffactor s fo rCENTRlhJGA LCASTIN G (CC ) ar e base d o n sourc e tes tdat afro m aC C operatio n tha theat s th e mold s ^blowin g ho tai rintp^n e mol d durin g cure . Th e UE Ffactor s fo r C C shoul d therefor e onl yb e appliecKt o operation^^lmila rt o thi s source ; i.e. , thos e tha tus e ho t ai rt o internall yhea tth e mol d durin g cnre . I faC C operatio n employ s manua l o rmeefianica l resi n application , an d ope n curin g a tambien t temperatures , the n th e UE F factor s foi^manualormechanica l resi n applicatio n shoul d b e used . I faC C operatio n employ s maptra l o rmechanica l r-^si n application , an d th e mold s ar e the n close d durin g cure , the n th e UE Fjaftor s fo rcovere d cur e shoul d b e used. " Thanks , Joh n FROM== * Joh n SchwejJ&e r Sr
. Direrte fo fGov't
. Affair s Composite s Fabricators Assoc . voiceT734.622.016 2 fa*734.622.0122 nschwtzr@ate.ne t www.cfa-hq.or a
CERTIFICATIONS

[CERTIFICATIONS NEED TO BE CHECKED. WE HAVE ONLY INCLUDED THEM PREVIOUSLY IN
QUARTERLY REPORTS]

I, James B. Hovis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Phlo Corporation and
Affiliates;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report
(the "Evaluation Date"); and

c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 3, 2005

                                /s/ James B. Hovis
                                -------------------------------------------
                                James B. Hovis
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal
financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended April 4, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information
contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 4, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Linda MillageLinda MillagePrincipal Financial Officer




Date: June 22, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's  unaudited  financial  statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                                 0001012704
<NAME>                                        UGLY DUCKLING CORP
<MULTIPLIER>                                               1,000

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                                    18,455
<SECURITIES>                                              13,368
<RECEIVABLES>                                             59,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                               8,125
<INVENTORY>                                                5,752
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               0<F1>
<PP&E>                                                    23,591
<DEPRECIATION>                                            (2,939)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           118,063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          0<F1>
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  82,612
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (293)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             118,063
<SALES>                                                   53,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          75,629
<CGS>                                                     29,890
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          24,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           9,811
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         5,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            5,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                               5,866
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   .60
<FN>
<F1>UNCLASSIFIEDBALANCESHEET
</FN>


</TABLE>
Order entered October 3 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 12
- 01678
- CR
CHARLES RICHARD VAND IVER, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. F12
- 56764
- M 

### O RDER Appellant has informed the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders brief filed by appellate counsel. Accordingly, we ORDER appellate counsel Valencia Bush to provide appellant with copies of th e clerk’s and reporter’s records. We further ORDER Ms.
Bush to provide this Court, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that the record has been sent to appellant. Appellant’s pro se response is due by DECEMBER 9, 2013

. We DIRECT the Clerk to send cop ies of this order , by electronic transmission, to the
Honorable Ernest White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal R ecords Division;Belinda Baraka, Official Court Reporter, 194th Judicial District Court; Valencia Bush; and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first

- class mail, to Charles Vandiver, TDCJ No. 1 831208, Dalhart Unit, 11950 F.M. 998, Dalhart, Texas 79022.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2488

RODNEY VICTOR HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus DONALD G. POWERS, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-681-7) Submitted: April 23, 2004 Decided: May 10, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Victor Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rodney Victor Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on October 21, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on December 1, 2003. Because Harris failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny his motions to submit circuit court transcripts and for a continuance, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the Issuer).



I, Robert J. Cooney, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that:



| | (i) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated: May 3, 2004



/s/    Robert J. CooneyName: Robert J. Cooney
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00108-CR

DAN DANIEL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 87th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-022-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On April 16, 2014, Dan Daniel filed a pro se notice of appeal of his conviction for 

aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Daniel’s imposition of sentence was on 

October 29, 2013, and the judgment of conviction was signed the same day. Daniel’s 

notice of appeal is untimely, and we have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no 

appellate jurisdiction where notice of appeal is untimely).

Daniel also signed a waiver of his right to appeal in this case, and the trial court’s 
Daniel v. State Page 2

certification of defendant’s right to appeal in this case indicates that Daniel waived his 

right to appeal. This appeal is therefore dismissed.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. 

State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals ... must dismiss a 

prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”); Davis 

v. State, 205 S.W.3d 606, 607 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.). 

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 24, 2014

Do not publish

[CR25]

 

1 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is 

rendered. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by 

filing a petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals 

within 30 days after either the day the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the day the last timely 

motion for rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).
S. 441

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To reauthorize appropriations for certain programs under the Indian Child Protection

and Family Violence Prevention Act, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF PROGRAMS.

Sections 409(e), 410(h), and 411(i) of the Indian Child Protection

and Family Violence Prevention Act (25 U.S.C. 3208(e), 3209(h),

and 3210(i), respectively) are each amended by striking ‘‘and 1995’’

and inserting ‘‘1995, 1996, and 1997’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.