alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 312 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 312

   To provide for an Assistant Administrator for Indian Lands in the 
        Environmental Protection Agency, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 1 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for an Assistant Administrator for Indian Lands in the 
        Environmental Protection Agency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR FOR INDIAN LANDS.

    (a) In General.--
            (1) Appointment.--The President, by and with the advice and 
        consent of the Senate, shall appoint within the Environmental 
        Protection Agency an Assistant Administrator for Indian Lands.
            (2) Compensation.--The Assistant Administrator for Indian 
        Lands appointed under this subsection shall be compensated at a 
        rate provided for in level V of the Executive Schedule under 
        section 5316 of title 5, United States Code.
    (b) Duties.--The Assistant Administrator for Indian Lands appointed 
under this section shall--
            (1) coordinate the activities of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency with respect to Indian lands and federally 
        recognized Indian tribes; and
            (2) implement the stated policy of the Environmental 
        Protection Agency commonly referred to as the ``1984 Indian 
        Policy''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 5316 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``Assistant Administrator for Indian Lands, Environmental 
        Protection Agency.''.
                                 <all>
```
Memorandum

Subject: Telephone conversation between Nathan Topham and Mark DeLaquil

Date: December 23, 2013

Participants: Nathan Topham, U.S. EPA

Mark DeLaquil, legal counsel for Association of Battery Recyclers (ABR)

On December 23, 2013, a telephone conversation took place between Nathan Topham and Mark 

DeLaquil. Mr. Topham and Mr. DeLaquil discussed two issues related to the direct final 

rulemaking that was signed on December 20, 2013. 

Mr. DeLaquil asked whether block averages or rolling averages should be used when processing 

data collected from differential pressure monitors. Mr. DeLaquil also asked about the effective 

date of the direct final rulemaking. Mr. DeLaquil wanted to know whether the EPA intended for 

the effective date to occur 60 days after promulgation of the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register, or whether the amendments would be effective immediately.
Order filed March 23, 2015

In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01

- 14

- 00231

- CR

____________ NELSON OKWOLISA ILOD IGUWE , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1361714



### ORDERThis court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State ’ s Exhibit 23 and State ’ s Exhibit 24
.
The exhibit clerk of the 248th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of State ’ s Exhibit 23 and State ’ s Exhibit 24 , on or before April 2, 2015
. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon co mpletion of inspection, to return the original of State ’ s Exhibit 23 and State ’ s Exhibit 24 , to the clerk of the 248th District Court.

PER CURIAM
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 10343 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

ELVA NOEMI SALGADO

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:17

- CR

- 71

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Elva Noemi Salgado has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flore s , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Salgado has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Salgado ’ s response

. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
November 1, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-10343 Document: 00514707674 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/01/2018No. 18

- 10343

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-10343 Document: 00514707674 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/01/2018
Order entered July 9, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00859
- CV
NAUTIC MANAGEMENT VI , L.P., Appellant
V. CORNERSTONE HEALTHCA RE GROUP HOLDINGS, I NC., Appellee On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 11
- 04339 

### O RDER The Court has before it appellant’s motion to stay discovery and pretrial proceedings pending interlocutory appeal and appellee’s response to that motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS t hat all discovery and pretrial proceedings related to appellant be stayed. This stay shall remain in place until further order of this Court.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 7403]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; AD/ADRD Research--Renewal and Competing Revision Cooperative 
Agreements.
    Date: February 29, 2024.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sandhya Sanghi, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 2N230, (301) 496-2879, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cab9aba4aea2b3abe4b9aba4ada2a38aa4a3a2e4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d5a6b4bbb1bdacb4fba6b4bbb2bdbc95bbbcbdfbb2baa3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 30, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-02122 Filed 2-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1507 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1507

To provide for the extension of the Parole Commission to oversee cases 
   of prisoners sentenced under prior law, to reduce the size of the 
               Parole Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 22, 1995

   Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Thurmond, and Mr. Kennedy) 
 introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read 
                       the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the extension of the Parole Commission to oversee cases 
   of prisoners sentenced under prior law, to reduce the size of the 
               Parole Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PAROLE COMMISSION.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of section 235(b)(1) of the 
Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 2032) as it related to chapter 
311 of title 18, United States Code, and the Parole Commission, each 
reference in such section to ``ten years'' or ``ten-year period'' shall 
be deemed to be a reference to ``fifteen years'' or ``fifteen-year 
period'', respectively.
    (b) Powers and Duties of Parole Commission.--Notwithstanding 
section 4203 of title 18, United States Code, the United States Parole 
Commission may perform its functions with any quorum of Commissioners, 
or Commissioner, as the Commission may prescribe by regulation.

SEC. 3. REPEAL.

    Section 235(b)(2) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (98 Stat. 
2032) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 460

To amend title 23, United States Code, to ensure equity in the extent

to which businesses located near Interstate and Federal-aid primary

highways may erect outdoor advertising signs, displays, and devices,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 22, 1995

Mr. FORD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to ensure equity

in the extent to which businesses located near Interstate

and Federal-aid primary highways may erect outdoor

advertising signs, displays, and devices, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Highway Advertising

5 Equity Act’’.
2

•S 460 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADVERTISING ALONG HIGHWAYS.

2 Section 131 of title 23, United States Code, is

3 amended—

4 (1) in the first sentence of subsection (d), by in5 serting after ‘‘State law’’ the following: ‘‘as of the

6 date of enactment of the Highway Advertising Eq7 uity Act or after that date, and that are not subse8 quently rezoned for other than industrial or commer9 cial purposes’’; and

10 (2) in subsection (k), by striking ‘‘Subject to’’

11 and all that follows through ‘‘establishing’’ and in12 serting ‘‘A State may not establish’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Theodore R. Maloney, Chief Executive Officer ofMediCor Ltd. (the “Registrant”), certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof the Registrant;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The Registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Registrant and have:

 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofthis annual report) that has materially affected, or is likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The Registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: November 14, 2005 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
| /s/ Theodore R. Maloney       |   |
| Theodore R. Maloney,          |
| Chief Executive Officer       |
| (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 12 (Thursday, January 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 3394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00881]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP24-310-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Revised PS/GHG Surcharges for 
Powerserve to be effective 2/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 1/10/24.
    Accession Number: 20240110-5129.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/22/24.

    Docket Numbers: RP24-311-000.
    Applicants: LA Storage, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: LA Storage Implementation of 
Approved Tariff Language to be effective 2/11/2024.
    Filed Date: 1/10/24.
    Accession Number: 20240110-5168.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/22/24.

    Docket Numbers: RP24-312-000.
    Applicants: Guardian Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotied Rate PAL to be 
effective 1/11/2024.
    Filed Date: 1/11/24.
    Accession Number: 20240111-5027.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 1/23/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary 
to become a party to the proceeding. The filings are accessible in the 
Commission's eLibrary system (https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#115e414151777463723f767e67"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="16594646567073647538717960">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 11, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-00881 Filed 1-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 12.1



Paperweight Development Corp. and Subsidiaries

Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(unaudited)



|                                                  |  | Six Months Ended  |        |                   |   |                   | 
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------ | ----------------- | - | ----------------- | 
|                                                  |  | (Successor Basis) |        | (Successor Basis) |   | Predecessor Basis | 
|                                                  |  | June 29, 2003     |        | June 30, 2002     |   | 2002              | 
|Net earnings from continuing operations           |  | $                 | 8,656  |                   | $ | 5,128             | 
|Add: Income tax expense                           |  |                   | 551    |                   |   | 39                | 
|Add: Interest expense                             |  |                   | 26,840 |                   |   | 37,772            | 
|Minority interest in net earnings of subsidiaries |  |                   |       |                   |   |                  | 
|Equity in net income of unconsolidated affiliates |  |                   |       |                   |   |                  | 
|Portion of rent deemed interest factor            |  |                   | 1,328  |                   |   | 1,522             | 
|                                                  |  |                   |        |                   |   |                   | 
|Total earnings available for fixed charges        |  | $                 | 37,375 |                   | $ | 44,461            | 
|                                                  |  |                   |        |                   |   |                   | 
|Fixed charges:                                    |  |                   |        |                   |   |                   | 
|Interest expense                                  |  |                   | 26,840 |                   |   | 37,772            | 
|Portion of rent deemed interest factor            |  |                   | 1,328  |                   |   | 1,522             | 
|                                                  |  |                   |        |                   |   |                   | 
|Total fixed charges                               |  | $                 | 28,168 |                   | $ | 39,294            | 
|                                                  |  |                   |        |                   |   |                   | 
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                |  |                   | 1.3    |                   |   | 1.1               | 
|                                                  |  |                   |        |                   |   |                   |
#### Wilbur CANISTER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 29766.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 30, 1958.

*638No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is driving while intoxicated; the punishment, six months in jail and a fine of $250.

Only a partial statement of facts appears in the record. It consists of what purports to be the testimony of the appellant. On direct examination, he testified that he remembered the night of June 14 (the offense was alleged to have occurred on June 14, 1957) and that Johnny Watson was driving the automobile. On cross-examination, he was asked where Johnny Watson was, to which he replied that he had not seen him since Thanksgiving, and was then asked if he knew that he had the right to subpoena him, and he replied, “If I could find him I would have him come in.”

No brief has been filed by the appellant, and we overrule his objection that these questions misled the jury into believing that it was incumbent upon the appellant to produce evidence of his innocence.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, John Fuller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to In Veritas  Medical  Diagnostics,  Inc.  and will be retained by In
Veritas Medical  Diagnostics,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





March 17, 2006                             /s/ John Fuller
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John Fuller
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer