alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.3



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Paperweight Development Corp. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 4, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |                               |  |                        |  |                                                
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | PAPERWEIGHT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 17, 2004 |  |  |  |                               |  | /s/    DOUGLAS P. BUTH
|                    |  |  |  |                               |  |                        | 
|                    |  |  |  |                               |  | Name:                  |  | Douglas P. Buth                                
|                    |  |  |  |                               |  | Title:                 |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



3
EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’CONSENT

The Board of DirectorsICT Group, Inc.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-87912) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-32623, 333-56187, 333-55702 and 333-87912) of ICT Group, Inc. of our report dated February 10, 2003, withrespect to the consolidated balance sheet of ICT Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and related financialstatement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of ICT Group, Inc.

 

Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMarch 27, 2003
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports (and all references to our Firm) included in or made part of this
registration statement.
 
                                          ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 
Orange County, California
   
December 11, 1996
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                            9159                    7582
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1933                    2299
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (126)                  (1248)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11460                    9311
<PP&E>                                            3029                    2601
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2259)                  (1902)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   14601                   10010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5587                    6187
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                       3814                       0
<COMMON>                                           131                     118
<OTHER-SE>                                        5069                    3705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     14601                   10010
<SALES>                                          19812                   13171
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 19812                   13171
<CGS>                                             6540                    7902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6540                    7902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 13932                   17945
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (349)                   (395)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (311)                 (12281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (311)                 (12281)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $(0.03)                 $(1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.03)                 $(1.06)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.56

AMENDMENT NO. 3  TO THE  WELLPOINT 401(k) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN  (As Amended through January 1, 2001)

The WellPoint 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, as amended to January 1, 2001, is further amended effective as of February 28, 2002 to revise the
Bonus Contribution provisions.

1.    Section 2.20
defining "Participant" is expanded to include an Employee who is not employed by a Participating Company (and thus an "Eligible Employee"), but
receives an allocation of the Bonus Contribution described in Section 5.10.



2.    Section 5.10(b)(2)
is amended to expand the potential categories of Employees eligible to receive an allocation of the Bonus Contribution.



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, WellPoint Health Networks Inc. caused this Amendment to be executed this 26th day of February, 2002.

|WELLPOINT HEALTH NETWORKS INC. |                         |  |      
|------------------------------ | ----------------------- |  | -----
|                               |                         |  |      
|By:                            | /s/J. THOMAS VAN BERKEM |  | Date:

---

QuickLinks
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
                         388 Greenwich Street, 7th Floor
                          New York, New York 10013-2396

June 11, 2001


John W. Henry & Company, Inc.
301 Yamato Road, Suite 2200
Boca Raton, Fl. 33431-4931

Attn: Mr. Ken Webster

         Re:      Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Webster:

We are  writing  with  respect  to your  management  agreements  concerning  the
commodity pools to which reference is made below (the "Management  Agreements").
We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2002 and
all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

        Hutton Investors Futures Fund, L.P. II  (HIFF II)
        Shearson Lehman Select Advisors Futures Fund L.P.
        Shearson Mid-West Futures Fund
        Smith Barney Mid-West Futures Fund L.P. II
        JWH Strategic Allocation Master FD LLC
        The Saugatuck Fund L.P.

Please  acknowledge  receipt of this  modification  by signing  one copy of this
letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel  McAuliffe at the address
above or fax to  212-723-8985.  If you have any  questions  I can be  reached at
212-723-5435.

Very truly yours,

SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT LLC

By:      /s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         --------------------------
         Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
         Chief Financial Officer & Director


AGREED AND ACCEPTED
JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.

By:


Print Name:

DRMcA/sr
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1443

TAYE GEBRETSADIK TEKLE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A95-891-505)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: January 22, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICE OF ALAN M. PARRA, Bethesda, Maryland, for

Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A.

Hunolt, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Taye Gebretsadik Tekle, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”)

order adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s order denying

his motion to reopen and reconsider. We deny the petition for

review. 

We review the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider

with extreme deference and only for an abuse of discretion.

Stewart v. INS, 181 F.3d 587, 595 (4th Cir. 1999). Such motions

are disfavored “in a deportation proceeding, where, as a general

matter, every delay works to the advantage of the deportable alien

who wishes merely to remain in the United States.” INS v. Doherty,

502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992). “[A]dministrative findings of fact are

conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to

conclude to the contrary.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2000).

With respect to Tekle’s motion for reconsideration, he

failed to show any error of law or fact. With respect to his

request to reopen, Tekle failed to show that the evidence was

material and could not have been presented at the hearing. See 8

C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2), (3) (2006). Accordingly, we find the

immigration judge did not abuse her discretion.

We find no abuse of discretion with the Board’s denial of

Tekle’s motion for a transcript. Insofar as Tekle seeks review of

the immigration judge’s order denying his applications for asylum,
- 3 -

withholding from removal and withholding under the Convention

Against Torture, we are without jurisdiction. Tekle did not appeal

the immigration judge’s order to the Board. Consequently, he did

not exhaust his administrative remedies. See Asika v. Ashcroft,

362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004); Farrokhi v. INS, 900 F.2d

697, 700 (4th Cir. 1990). 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

I, Douglas P. Buth, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Paperweight Development Corp., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control. 

 

Date: August 11, 2003
No. 99-40811

- 1 -

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40811

Summary Calendar

 

JEHAAD A.M.E. SAAHIR,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:98-CV-1660

--------------------

May 5, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jehaad A.M.E. Saahir, Texas prisoner # 291515, seeks a

certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his

application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. Saahir’s motion for appointment of counsel is

DENIED. Saahir argues that the district court erred in failing

to address four grounds of error raised in his application. He 

also argues that the district court erred in finding that he had

not alleged that he was eligible for mandatory supervision.
No. 99-40811

- 2 -

Saahir is correct on both counts. The district court failed

to address the first four claims raised by Saahir challenging

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 498.005 (West 1998) and the TDCJ policy

adopted pursuant to that statute on due process, equal

protection, and ex post facto grounds. Saahir has made a

credible showing that the district court erred. Murphy v.

Johnson, 110 F.3d 10, 11 (5th Cir. 1997). A COA is GRANTED, the

judgment of the district court is VACATED, and this case is

REMANDED for consideration of those claims, including

consideration of whether Saahir should have raised these claims

in one of his earlier § 2254 applications and whether his attempt

to raise them in this application runs afoul of the prohibition

against filing successive § 2254 applications contained in the

AEDPA, 28 U.S.C. § 2244.

Saahir alleged that he was eligible for mandatory

supervision in the district court in the supplemental petition

filed in response to questions posed by the magistrate judge. He

alleged that he had served 20 calendar years and that if his good

time was restored he would be eligible for mandatory supervision. 

Saahir has made a credible showing that the district court erred

in dismissing his application because he had not stated whether

he was eligible for mandatory supervision. A COA is GRANTED on

this issue also, the judgment of the district court is VACATED,

and this case is REMANDED for the district court to consider the

merits of Saahir’s claim that he was deprived of due process at

his disciplinary proceedings.

GRANT COA, VACATE AND REMAND.
Exhibit 31.4



CERTIFICATION



I, Dale E. Parker, Chief Financial Officer of Paperweight Development Corp., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paperweight Development Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 15, 2005



|           |  |                        
|---------- |  | -----------------------
|           | 
|Signature: |  | /s/    DALE E. PARKER  
|           |  | Dale E. Parker         
|           |  | Chief Financial Officer
## Attachment 1 Bottom Ash Handling Diagram

## Attachment 1. Diagram of Tank - Based Bottom Ash System at Homer City Dewatering Bins Settling Tank Surge Tank Clearwell Bottom Ash Transport Water

Solids to Landfill Solids

Solids Solids Dewatering Bin Overflow and Decant

Recycled within Bottom Ash System or Used to Moisten Fly Ash Settling Tank Surge Tank
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 21
 
                         HOMESTEAD VILLAGE INCORPORATED
 
                     List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                                                     <C>
Homestead Village Management Incorporated.............................  Delaware
Homestead Village Limited Partnership.................................  Delaware
Atlantic Homestead Village (1) Incorporated...........................  Maryland
Atlantic Homestead Village (2) Incorporated...........................  Maryland
Atlantic Homestead Village Limited Partnership (a partnership owned by
 Atlantic Homestead Village (1) Incorporated and by Atlantic Homestead
 Village (2) Incorporated)............................................  Delaware
PTR Homestead Village (1) Incorporated................................  Maryland
PTR Homestead Village (2) Incorporated................................  Maryland
PTR Homestead Village Limited Partnership (a partnership owned by PTR
 Homestead Village (1) Incorporated and by PTR Homestead Village (2)
 Incorporated)........................................................  Delaware
Homestead Alabama Incorporated........................................  Alabama
Missouri Homestead Village Incorporated...............................  Maryland
K.C. Homestead Village Redevelopment Corporation......................  Missouri
BTW Incorporated......................................................  Delaware
BTW II Incorporated...................................................  Delaware
BTW III Incorporated..................................................  Delaware
BTW Limited Partnership...............................................  Delaware
HVI Incorporated......................................................  Delaware
HVI Trust.............................................................  Maryland
HVI (2) Incorporated..................................................  Delaware
</TABLE>