alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             923                     923
<SECURITIES>                                    20,498                  20,498
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,060                  11,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,242                   1,242
<INVENTORY>                                      1,189                   1,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,499                  35,499
<PP&E>                                          16,089                  16,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,183                   3,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,959                  51,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,019                   9,019
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           127                     127
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,766                  42,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,959                  51,959
<SALES>                                         12,745                  50,651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,745                  50,651
<CGS>                                            9,977                  39,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,485                  50,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (329)                   (589)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (411)                   1,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (106)                     600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (305)                     599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (305)                     148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)                    0.01
        

</TABLE>
SHAMEIL DONYEL SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-5334

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 16, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Hulsey, III, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
| EXHIBIT 99.1 |
|--------------|

| CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANACIAL REPORTS |
|----------------------------------------------|
| OF                                           |
| EXPRESSJET HOLDINGS, INC.                    |

I, James B. Ream, President and Chief Executive Officer of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (2) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates code), that:
|       | (1)   | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the “Periodic Report”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(1) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and |
|--------------------------------|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | (2)             | information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ExpressJet Holdings, Inc                                                                                                                        |

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the Periodic Report.
|  Date:  October 23, 2002                 |                  | **/s/ James B. Ream                          ** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                      | James B. Ream President and Chief Executive Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 7406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Fetal Programming and Aging.
    Date: February 27, 2024.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kaitlyn Noel Lewis Hardell, Ph.D., M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National 
Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Bldg., Suite 
2E405, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 555-1234, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a2c9c3cbd6cedbcc8ccac3d0c6c7cecee2cccbca8cc5cdd4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb0bab2afb7a2b5f5b3baa9bfbeb7b79bb5b2b3f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 30, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-02123 Filed 2-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
14910-13-PI



### 14CFR Part 39 DEPARTMENT OF TRA.-NSPORTATION federal A,,;ation Administration



# o't~ Y IDocket No. FAA-201o-H,*u; 

### Directorate Identifier 2009-I\'M-261-ADI 

### RlN 2120-AA64 Ainvortbiness Directives; Airbus 

### Model A310 Series
. .o\1rpla.TJ.cs AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. 

### ACflON: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). 

# ~- SUMM.o\RY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the pradu IS~_ T-

"" 

### ~", 

# ..• {.~ 

## ~"'6/;C(//~



# • • 

# • • 

# • • 

# • listed above that ",",'auldsupersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated byan aviaiion 

## ~.",,,,,- authority of another country to identify and co~ect an unsafe condition on an aviatiOl 

# 'jij~ product. The MeAl describes the unsafe COndi[iOnas: 

## ~if 

# /q 10 During High Time Equipment (HTE) rJicws conducted within the scope 

### o~the A3l0 aircraft D~sign-Servj.ce Go~l(DSG) ~xtensio~work, Airb.us dlscovcrcd that the sphned c.ouphngs

# aq~ the sliding bcanngs ofthe flap transm.ission system could be affected 

# oy corrosion and wear, especially when their protective components-suchlas wiper rings and rubber gaiters 

### could be'OOmedefective. 

## 11 This condition, ifnot detected and corr eted, could degrade the functional integrity of the flap transmission 

### systerbl.

Theproposed AD would requireactions thatarc intended to address theunsafecondi ~n described in the MeAL DATES: We must receivecOIlUnenlS on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

FAA Form 136~14.1 {6-89} OFFICIAL ALE 

### copy
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 21.1

                     UNITED PAYORS & UNITED PROVIDERS, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


The Company directly or indirectly owns the following subsidiaries:

   National Health Services, Inc. (a Wisconsin corporation)
   National Health Services of Mississippi, Inc. (a Mississippi corporation)
   Healthcare Review Corporation (a Kentucky corporation)
   Healthcare Review Corporation of Missouri, Inc. (a Missouri corporation)
   Healthcare Review Corporation of New York, Inc. (a New York corporation)
   Medical Network, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
   NHS Coordinated Care, Inc. (a Nevada corporation)
   NHS Coordinated Care of Texas, Inc. (a Texas corporation)
   IM&I-NEWCO, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
   America's Health Card Services, Inc. (an Iowa corporation)
   UP&UP, Inc. (a Maryland corporation)
   The Nation's Health Plan, Inc. (a Florida corporation)
   Health Plans of America, Inc. (a Maryland corporation)


<PAGE>
II

Calendar No. 78

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 212

[Report No. 104–56]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 12 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. KERRY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

APRIL 18, 1995

Reported, under authority of the order of the Senate of April 6 (legislative

day, April 5), 1995, by Mr. PRESSLER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

SHAMROCK V.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108
2

S 212 RS

1 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer2 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica3 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

4 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

5 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the

6 coastwise trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V (United

7 States official number 900936).

Calendar No. 78

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 212

[Report No. 104–56]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

wise trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V.priate endorsement for employment in the coastissue a certificate of documentation with approAPRIL 18, 1995

Reported without amendment
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2



                     CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHEAST, L.P.
                 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
                      (In thousands except ratio amounts)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      1996             1995            1994
                                    --------         --------        --------
Earnings
<S>                                 <C>             <C>             <C>
Loss before taxes                   $(31,950)       $ (27,465)      $ (9,609)
Fixed Charges                         33,662           19,460          4,903
                                    --------        ---------       --------
Earnings                               1,712           (8,005)        (4,706)
Fixed Charges
Interest Expense                      32,517           18,671          4,655
Interest Element of Rentals              206              132             33
Amortization of debt costs               939              657            215
                                    --------          -------       --------
Total Fixed Charges                 $ 33,662          $19,460         $4,903
                                    ========          =======       ========
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges       -                -              -
</TABLE>

(1)  Earnings for the year ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were
     insufficient to cover the fixed charges by $31,950, $27,465 and $9,609,
     respectively.  As a result of such deficiencies, the ratios are not
     presented above.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 28, 2021

NO. 03-20-00418-CV

K. T., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 250TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the order terminating parental rights signed by the trial court on July 30, 

2020. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order terminating 

parental rights. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is 

made.
#### Ex Parte Austin MUCKELROY.

No. 34317.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 10, 1962.

■George S. McCarthy, Amarillo, C. S. Farmer, Waco, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is a habeas corpus proceeding attacking the validity of a 5 to 25 year sentence for rape now being served by the petitioner. The application for habeas corpus *836was granted by Hon. Max Boyer, Judge of the 84th Judicial District, and made returnable before this Court under the provisions of Art. 119, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

The contention is that the conviction *is*void because the petitioner was not admonished of the consequences of his plea of guilty. Reliance is had upon the absence of any showing in the statement of facts upon the trial that the petitioner was admonished or advised by the court as to the punishment which the law provides may be assessed by the jury on a trial for the offense of rape.

The recent case of Henage v. State, No. 33,658, Tex.Cr.App., 352 S.W.2d 122, is controlling. There we said “There is no certification that all the court said in admonishing the defendant appears in the statement of facts herein.”

In the case before us, in addition to the statement of facts, we have the arraignment of the defendant entered of record, which contains the statement that the defendant answered that he was guilty *and*“was admonished by the court of the consequences of said plea”; the charge to the jury which stated that the defendant pleaded guilty “and has persisted in entering such plea, notwithstanding the court, as required by law, admonished him of the consequences of such plea”; and the judgment which recites that the defendant pleaded guilty and “thereupon the said defendant was admonished by the court of the consequences of said plea.”

The relief prayed for is denied.

MORRISON, Judge

(dissenting).

While I concurred in the disposition of Henage v. State, supra, I did so on the grounds that the admonition as to possible punishment was sufficient. I did not agree to the overruling of Braggs v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 334 S.W.2d 793, and do not now so agree. Braggs is authority for the granting of this writ.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**LEV
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Joshua D. Schein, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1)
          The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      the
      Company.





Date:
                November 14, 2007
            
            /s/
                Joshua D. Schein, Ph.D.Joshua
                D. Schein, Ph.D.Chief
                Executive Officer





*This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
      date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
      retained by Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request* *.*
#### Gregory L. SMITH, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7605.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 12, 2003.

Gregory L. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Gregory L. Smith, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken *from the*final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Smith has not made the requisite showing. *See Smith v. Angelone,*No. CA-02-564 (E.D.Va. filed Sept. 17, 2002 & entered Sept. 18, 2002).

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*