alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
§1350, the undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |        |  |                                           
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  |                     
|                         |  |  |  |  | 
|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |        |  | /s/ Dale E. Parker                        
|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Name:  |  | Dale E. Parker                            
|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Title: |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



2
#### Pat GLASS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28022.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1956.

Rehearing Denied March 28, 1956.

Nat Friedman, Houston, Collins, Garrison, Renfrow & Zeleskey, Henry H. Rogers, Lufkin, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, a fine of $200.

No statement of facts on the main trial accompanies the record.

The sole question presented for review is the sufficiency of the complaint which was signed and sworn to by Rose Marie Murray, a secretary in the district attorney’s office.

Appellant’s contention that the complaint is invalid has been recently overruled in Catchings v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 285 S.W.2d 233; Whiteside v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 286 S.W.2d 137; and Lurie v. State, Tex.Cr. pp., 288 S.W.2d 505.

All proceedings appearing regular and no reversible error appearing, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

*523On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

In Kennedy v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 276 S.W.2d 291, we held that a valid information could not be presented upon a complaint sworn to by an assistant prosecuting attorney. We endeavored to make it clear that such holding was founded upon the proposition that assistant prosecuting attorneys, when acting in their official capacities, so act not as assistants but as and for their principal. Upon that hypothesis, we concluded that an information presented by a prosecuting attorney upon the complaint of one of his assistants constituted nothing more nor less than a presentment of an information by the prosecuting attorney upon his own complaint.

We held that this would not only be contrary to public policy but would constitute no complaint at all, for the official administering the oath and attesting the jurat could not administer the oath to himself.

In Catchings v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 285 S.W.2d 233, we held that a valid information could be presented upon the complaint of a secretary employed in the office of the prosecuting attorney and that as to such person the rule announced in the Kennedy case, supra, did not apply.

The information, here, was presented upon the complaint of the same secretary as in the Catchings case.

Appellant insists that the Kennedy case is right and should be followed and that the Catchings case is wrong and should not be followed.

In its final analysis, appellant’s position is that there is no basis for a distinction between the two fact situations, and that the secretary, as an employee, occupies the same position as does an assistant, in so far as the law is concerned.

The above discussion of the holding in the Kennedy case and that in the Catchings case evidences the distinction between the two. When the assistant acts, such act is the act of the principal; the employee’s act is not the act of the principal.

We remain convinced that the Catchings case, supra, is here controlling.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSF Group Holding, Inc (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 2nd Quarter 2004 ending September 27,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Stephen A. Lightstone, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                                
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Stephen A. Lightstone                                      
| |  |                                                                
| |  | Stephen A. Lightstone
Chief Financial Officer
November 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 

 The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of 

Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 

1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice 

Thomas J. Moyer. 

 Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's 

Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. 

Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Whitten, Administrative 

Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. 

Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. 

 NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the 

full texts of the opinions after they have been released 

electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised 

to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West 

Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. 

The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume 

and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound 

volumes of the Ohio Official Reports. 

 

In re Application of Keita. 

[Cite as In re Application of Keita (1992), Ohio St.3d .] 

Character and fitness review -- Remand for further 

 investigation. 

 (No. 91-1266 -- Submitted December 29, 1992 -- Decided 

December 30, 1992.) 

 This matter is pending before the court upon the 

recommendation of the Board of Commissioners on Character and 

Fitness that Sundiata Keita's application to take the Ohio bar 

examination be disapproved. 

 IT WAS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that before a 

determination would be made on the merits of this case the 

applicant, Sundiata Keita, was to submit to an independent 

psychiatric evaluation; that such evaluation was to be 

conducted by a psychiatrist selected by the court; and that 

such evaluation be at the applicant's expense. It was further 

ordered that this matter be stayed pending the court's receipt 

of the psychiatrist's report. See In re Keita (1992), 62 Ohio 

St.3d 1492, 583 N.E.2d 316. 

 On October 27, 1992, Otto Kausch, M.D., and Phillip J. 

Resnick, M.D., filed a psychiatric evaluation with this court. 

On December 7, 1992, the special investigator for the Board of 

Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed a motion to remand 

this cause to the Board of Commissioners on Character and 

Fitness for further proceedings. Upon consideration thereof, 

 IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion to remand be, 

and the same is hereby, granted. 

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be remanded to the 

Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness for 

consideration of the psychiatric evaluation and further 

investigation with respect to issues raised by the evaluation. 

 Moyer, C.J., Douglas, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. 

 Sweeney, Holmes and Wright, JJ., dissent.
#### Charlie BIGGS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 27880.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1955.

No appearance for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted as a second offender for a violation of the liquor law in Lubbock County, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $200 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0282**
P--1—. 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

22) ll-C-48 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:27 PM Sheet 22 of 343 
P.2 

QOC 3 C~Z3 

a" 

FAX COMMUNICATION 

Date: 

FROM: 

/(?/*<&/ff_ 

TO: 

/rf/Zan,'* S. frroc-fo^ 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

5001 South Miami Blvd., Suite 300 

Post Office Box 12077 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077 

(919) 941-0333 

FAX NUMBER: (919) 941-0234 

^ ^ 

Name : 

Address: 

Iff/ V<~ch(:,(*/ 

A-94-52 

Phone Number: 

FAX NUMBER: 

"J /ss f' Uf oof/ E*n /r^r />~> 's/s , •?*? g . 

R;vf^ <=,. ^ , C A 12 ^1 % - 7 6 3 p 

(fo?) 2 S~3 - 7Q 6/ 

REFERENCE CODE: /VJof 0 0 0 

THIS COMMUNICATION COMPRISES PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE. 

COMMENTS: 
P.3 

O PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

Central Park West 

5001 South Miami Boulevard 

PO Box 12077 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077 

(919) 941 -0333 FAX (919) 941 -0234 

October 8,1996 

Mr. Jeff Denchfield 

Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc. 

Safety and Environmental Dep«artment 

3125 Myers Street 

Riverside, CA 92513-7638 

Dear Mr. Denchfield: 

As you know, some questions have been raised concerning the data you submitted in the 

1992/3 survey. We ^e trying to ensure that data are still correct and if necessary, update the 

infonnation. Per our conversation today, you indicated that the resins you 4ire currently using are 

different from 1992/3 and change from year to year. You requested that I send a written 

notification to you requesting the updated information. 

Therefore, per our discussion, I <^m faxing you this request for updated information 

concerning the percentage of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) as supplied for each ofthe resins 

used by Fleetwood Enterprises and the annual distribution ofthe usage for each of those resins. 

Ple«ase provide this information sep.3rately for each of your facilities. If any HAP are added to 

the supplied resin, please indicate this .and provide the quantity of HAP added for each resin. 

You pointed out in our telephone conversation that some of your resins are filled when they are 

applied. Please provide the amount of filler that you add to each of your resins. As we 

discussed, do not include information for the portion of your resins used for the production of 

boats or personal water crafts as these will be covered under a different standard than the 

National Emission Standard of Hazardous Air Pollutants for the reinforced plastic composites 

industry. 

Thank you for your cooperation and please call me at (919) 941-0333, if you have any 

questions about the information that we are requesting. 

Sincerely, 

PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

Melanie S. Proctor 

cc: PES Correspondence File 

Madeleine Strum, EPA 

WASHINGTON. D.C. • RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK. NC • LOS ANGELES. CA • CINCINNATI, OH
September 18, 2015

Mr. Stephen Uhl

4904 Wunnenberg Way

West Chester, OH 45069

Dear Mr. Uhl :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.103(b), 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151(a),

91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2), 91.417(a) and (b), and part 21,

Subpart H, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your May 26, 2015 exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 1973 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This web site helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will c lose the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1977 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1977

 To designate a United States courthouse located in Tampa, Florida, as 
    the ``Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse'', and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 1996

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate a United States courthouse located in Tampa, Florida, as 
    the ``Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse'', and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SAM M. GIBBONS UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse located at 611 North Florida Avenue in 
Tampa, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``Sam M. Gibbons 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sam M. Gibbons 
United States Courthouse''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.66

AMENDMENT
TO THE
WELLPOINT 401(k) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
(As Amended Through March 1, 2002)

The WellPoint 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan ("Plan"), as amended through March 1, 2002, is further amended effective as of the dates provided below (i) to
authorize Participants age 50 and over to make Catch Up Contributions (as defined below) and (ii) to increase the maximum deferral percentage permitted for the Plan Year.

1.    The
first sentence of Section 5.01 governing Salary Deferral Contributions is amended as follows, effective for payroll periods beginning after April 6, 2003, to increase
the maximum contribution per payroll period to 50%.



2.    A
new subsection (d) is added at the end of Section 5.01, effective for Plan Years beginning on and after January 1, 2003, to authorize an additional contribution for
Participants who attain age 50 by the end of the Plan Year, as permitted under changes made by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001.



3.    Effective
for payroll periods beginning after April 6, 2003, the first sentence of Section 5.02(a) is amended to read:



4.    Effective
for payroll periods beginning after April 6, 2003, the second and third sentences of Section 5.02(b) are amended to read:



---

5.    Effective
for payroll periods beginning after April 6, 2003, the second sentence of Section 5.02(d) is amended to read:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, WellPoint Health Networks Inc. caused this Amendment to be executed this 16th day of March, 2003.

WELLPOINT HEALTH NETWORKS INC.

|By: |  | /s/J. THOMAS VAN BERKEM |  | Date: |  | March 16, 2003
|--- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----- |  | --------------
|    |  |                         |  |       |  |               

2

---
CERTIFICATIONS


CERTIFICATE
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Phlo Corporation and Subsidiaries (the
      “Company”) the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”), I, James B. Hovis, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
                July 14, 2006/s/
                James B. HovisJames
                B. Hovis
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 6, 2008
 SM&A
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    0-23585
    
    33-0080929(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California
    
    92660(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (949) 975-1550
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)
 see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEX-99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
   
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release dated November 6, 2008
 2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  November 6, 2008
    SM&ABy:
    /s/ James R. EckstaedtName:
    James R. EckstaedtTitle:
    Executive Vice President, Finance
and Chief Financial Officer 3




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit List
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release dated November 6, 2008
 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             923
<SECURITIES>                                    20,498
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,242
<INVENTORY>                                      1,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,499
<PP&E>                                          16,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,019
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,959
<SALES>                                         50,651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,651
<CGS>                                           39,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (589)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,199
<INCOME-TAX>                                       600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                599
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       148
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>