alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: J.A.

PETITION OF: J.A.

:

:

:

:

:

No. 233 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of September, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
Parraguirre 

, J. 

Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004); 

Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 

281 (1997). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

o

titA„..\ 

Douglas 

cc: Hon. Gloria Sturman, District Judge 

Lipson Neilson Cole Seltzer & Garin, P.C. 

Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC 

Christina Soscia 

Mincin Law, PLLC 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) I947A
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,262,149
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,086,899<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,779,580
<INVENTORY>                                 72,974,397
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           117,363,187
<PP&E>                                       4,333,070
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,027,197
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             145,182,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       48,364,216
<BONDS>                                     14,857,143<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,563
<OTHER-SE>                                  81,062,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               145,182,548
<SALES>                                    151,407,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           161,943,869
<CGS>                                      110,358,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              110,358,502
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,350,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             16,933,815<F3>
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,604,188<F4>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         10,329,627<F5>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,862,140
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,467,487<F6>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21<F7>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21<F8>
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,779,580
<F2>Comprised of long-term debt
<F3>Excludes income tax benefit of $426,033. (See Note 10 to Financial Statements)
<F4>Pro forma income taxes. (See Note 10 to the Financial Statements)
<F5>Pro forma income before extraordinary item after giving effect to pro forma
income taxes. (See Note 10 to Financial Statements)
<F6>Net income after giving effect to pro forma income taxes. (See Note 10 to
Financial Statements)
<F7>Net income after giving effect to pro forma income taxes. (See Note 10 to
Financial Statements)
<F8>Net income after giving effect to pro forma income taxes. (See Note 10 to
Financial Statements)
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal
financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:



1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) the information
contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Jane ToddJane ToddChief Financial Officer




Date: August 17, 2005



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-517
In Re: RESTONEY ROBINSON, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-96-1017-6) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Restoney Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Restoney Robinson has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus from this court seeking summary judgment on several district court orders and orders of this court, and the commencement of perjury charges against various individuals. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Mandamus relief is only available when there are no other means by which the relief sought could be granted, see In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987), and may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re Catawba Indian Tribe , 973 F.2d 1133, 1135 (4th Cir. 1992). The party seeking mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has “no other adequate means to attain the relief he desires” and that his entitlement to such relief is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc. , 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980) (citation omitted). Robinson has not made such a showing. Accordingly, we deny both his petition and supplemental petition for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
O RDER

- 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 22

- 0 342

STATE OF MONTANA

,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JEREMY HOLMQUIST,

Defendant and Appellant

.

___________________________________________________ ______________

ORDER

_______________ ___________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including January 30 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file,

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed and dated as indicated below.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2024

01/03/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0342
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 16.3

                          [ARTHUR ANDERSEN LETTERHEAD]


December 2, 1996


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Re:      Global Outdoors, Inc.
         Commission File Number 0-17287


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read Item 4 included in the attached Amendment No. 1 to Form 8-K, dated
October 15, 1996, of Global Outdoors, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and are in agreement with the statements contained therein.

Very Truly Yours,

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Report of Independent Public Accountants


To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements of
Household Finance Corporation (the "Company") and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and have issued our
report thereon dated January 21, 1998.  We have not audited
any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to December 31, 1997, or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on
those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention
that caused us to believe that the Company was not in
compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or
conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated May 1, 1996, in conjunction with the
Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series
1996-1 insofar as they relate to accounting matters.  It
should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed
primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of
the Company's system of internal accounting controls over
the Company's home equity loan portfolio, including those
loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we
considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by
generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with
these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation,
which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting
systems, was to determine the nature, timing and extent of
the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion
on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also
took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit
requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised
Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.  However, certain procedures included in the
audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans
being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not
performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records
relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that,
in our opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to
report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and
should not be used for any other purpose.



Chicago, Illinois
January 21, 1998
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52379-52380]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21326]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 344]

Delegation by the Secretary of State to the Assistant Secretary 
of State for Consular Affairs the Authority to Determine That it is 
Necessary To Waive a Visa Interview as a Result of Unusual or Emergent 
Circumstances

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act, as 
amended (22 U.S.C. 2651a), I hereby delegate to the Assistant Secretary 
of State for Consular Affairs, to the extent authorized by law, the 
authority to determine that a visa interview waiver is necessary as a 
result of unusual or emergent circumstances, as provided under Section 
222(h)(1)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. Sec.  
1202.
    Any act, executive order, regulation, or procedure subject to, or 
affected by, this delegation shall be deemed to be such act, executive 
order, regulation, or

[[Page 52380]]

procedure as amended from time to time.
    This delegation of authority may be re-delegated to the Deputy 
Assistant Secretary for Visa Services.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, the Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, 
and the Under Secretary for Management may at any time exercise any 
authority or function delegated by this delegation of authority.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: August 20, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-21326 Filed 8-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P
```
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000448 16-MAY-2017 08:05 AM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2013

h0722 

# Order

Clerk July 30, 2013

146729 & (9)(14)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146729

COA: 314455

Kent CC: 88

- 044714

- FC

AARON DAVID MITCHELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 1, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DEN IED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for

appointment of counsel and the motion to remand are DENIED.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 364

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in the operation

of certain visitor facilities associated with, but outside the boundaries

of, Rocky Mountain National Park in the State of Colorado.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 7 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate

in the operation of certain visitor facilities associated

with, but outside the boundaries of, Rocky Mountain

National Park in the State of Colorado.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘The Fall River Visitor

5 Center Act of 1995’’.
2

S 364 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS OUTSIDE AUTHORIZED

2 BOUNDARY OF ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL

3 PARK.

4 (a) VISITOR CENTER.—The Secretary of the Interior

5 is authorized to collect and expend donated funds and ex6 pend appropriated funds for the operation and mainte7 nance of a visitor center to be constructed for visitors to

8 and administration of Rocky Mountain National Park

9 with private funds on the privately owned lands described

10 in subsection (b).

11 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PARCELS OF LAND.—The lands

12 referred to in subsection (a) are described as follows:

13 Being land owned by H.W. Stewart, Inc., and more par14 ticularly described as follows: Beginning at the southwest

15 corner of the north one-half of section 16, township 5

16 north, range 73 west of the sixth principle meridian, Colo17 rado; thence south eighty-seven degrees six minutes east,

18 eight hundred and fifty-four feet; thence north two degrees

19 west, three hundred and forty-six and one-tenth feet to

20 the south boundary of the right-of-way of U.S. Highway

21 34; thence northwesterly along said south boundary nine

22 hundred and sixty feet to the west line of said section 16;

23 thence south along the west line of said section 16 to the

24 point of beginning.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 21 (Wednesday, January 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 6119]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK RC2 Application 
Review.
    Date: March 1, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892,(Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Cheryl Nordstrom, Ph.D., M.Ph., Scientific 
Review Officer, NIDDK/Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes 
of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Room 7013, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
402-6711, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#197a717c6b60753777766b7d6a6d6b767459777071377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1172797463687d3f7f7e63756265637e7c517f78793f767e67">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01849 Filed 1-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 205

To amend title 37, United States Code, to revise and expand the prohibition

on accrual of pay and allowances by members of the Armed Forces

who are confined pending dishonorable discharge.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 11 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To amend title 37, United States Code, to revise and expand

the prohibition on accrual of pay and allowances by

members of the Armed Forces who are confined pending

dishonorable discharge.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PAY AND ALLOWANCES.

4 (a) REVISION OF PROHIBITION.—(1) Section 804 of

5 title 37, United States Code, is amended to read as fol6 lows:
2

•S 205 IS

1 ‘‘§ 804. Prohibition of accrual of pay and allowances

2 during confinement pending dishonor3 able discharge

4 ‘‘(a) PAY AND ALLOWANCES NOT TO ACCRUE.—A

5 member of the armed forces sentenced by a court-martial

6 to a dishonorable discharge is not entitled to pay and al7 lowances for any period during which the member is in

8 confinement after the adjournment of the court-martial

9 that adjudged such sentence.

10 ‘‘(b) RESTORATION OF ENTITLEMENT.—If a sen11 tence of a member of the armed forces to dishonorable

12 discharge is disapproved, mitigated, or changed by an offi13 cial authorized to do so or is otherwise set aside by com14 petent authority, the prohibition in subsection (a) shall

15 cease to apply to the member on the basis of that sentence

16 and the member shall be entitled to receive the pay and

17 allowances that, under subsection (a), did not accrue to

18 the member by reason of that sentence.’’.

19 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The item relating to

20 section 804 in the table of sections at the beginning of

21 chapter 15 of such title is amended to read as follows:

‘‘804. Prohibition of accrual of pay and allowances during confinement pending

dishonorable discharge.’’.
3

•S 205 IS

1 (b) PROSPECTIVE APPLICABILITY.—The amendment

2 made by subsection (a)(1) does not apply to pay periods

3 beginning before the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 276

To provide for criminal penalties for defrauding financial institutions carrying

out programs under the Small Business Act and the Small Business

Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 25 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. D’AMATO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for criminal penalties for defrauding financial

institutions carrying out programs under the Small Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of

1958, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Finan5 cial Institution Protection Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES.

7 Section 1344 of title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended—
2

•S 276 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ‘‘or the Small

2 Business Administration’’ after ‘‘financial institu3 tion’’; and

4 (2) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or the Small

5 Business Administration’’ after ‘‘financial institu6 tion,’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.37



Description of Compensation of Non-Employee Directors



Each member of the Board of Directors who is not an employee of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) will receive for fiscal year 2005
and thereafter, until changed by the Board of Directors, fees for service on the Companys Board of Directors as listed in the table below. The members of the Board are also reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with attendance at
Board and committee meetings.



|                                                                        |  |   |       
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------
|Annual Fee                                                              |  | $ | 25,000
|Quarterly and special Board meetings attended in Person or by telephone |  | $ | 2,500 
|Other telephonic meetings                                               |  | $ | 500   
|Committee Meetings  Chairmen                                           |  | $ | 2,000 
|Committee Meetings  members                                            |  | $ | 1,250 



Under the Companys 1996
Non-Employee Directors Plan, each non-employee director receives, upon initial election to the Board, an option to purchase 15,000 shares of Common Stock. These initial options are exercisable with respect to fifty percent (50%) of the shares on the
date of grant and become exercisable with respect to the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the shares on the first anniversary of the date of grant if the director continues to be a member of the board of directors through that date. These initial
options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant and expire ten years after issuance. In addition, each non-employee director is granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of Common Stock on the
date of each annual meeting; these options vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant if the director continues to be a member of the board of directors through that date, have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common
Stock on the date of grant and expire ten years after issuance.