alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of
American River Bankshares
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of American River Bankshares, a California corporation
(the Company), does hereby certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The
 Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009
 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | 2. | Information
 contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                      

|                        |  |                                        | 
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- | 
|Dated:
 August 12, 2009 |  | By: /s/
 DAVID T. TABER                | 
|                        |  |                                       
|                        |  | David T.
 Taber                        | 
|                        |  | President
 and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        |  |                                        | 
|Dated:
 August 12, 2009 |  | By: /s/
 MITCHELL A. DERENZO           | 
|                        |  |                                       
|                        |  | Mitchell A.
 Derenzo                   | 
|                        |  | Executive
 Vice President and          | 
|                        |  | Chief
 Financial Officer               | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to American River Bankshares and will be retained by American River
Bankshares and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

55

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7310

LARRY MEYER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-99-173-2) Submitted: February 29, 2000 Decided: March 27, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Meyer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Larry Meyer appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint, and thedistrict court’s order denying both his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration and his motion to amend. However, because the sole issue Meyer raised in his informal brief relates to the district court’s denial of his motion to amend, we have limited our review to that issue. See Local Rule 34(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion relating to the denial of Meyer’s motion to amend and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Meyer v. Hinkle , No. CA-99-173-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 21.1



Registrant had the following significant subsidiaries as of June 25, 2003:



|Name                                               |  | State ofIncorporation |  | PercentageOwnership |  
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------- | -
|Keystone Automotive Industries MN, Inc. (1)        |  | Minnesota             |  | 100                 | %
|Keystone Automotive Industries FL, Inc. (2)        |  | Florida               |  | 100                 | %
|Keystone Automotive Industries Resources, Inc. (3) |  | Delaware              |  | 100                 | %
|Keystone Automotive Industries TN, Inc. (4)        |  | Tennessee             |  | (5                  | )

---

|(1) |  | Formerly North Star Plating Company
|--- |  | -----------------------------------

|(2) |  | Formerly Inteuro Parts Distributors, Inc.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------

|(3) |  | Formerly Republic Automotive Parts, Inc.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------

|(4) |  | Formerly Fenders & More, Inc.
|--- |  | -----------------------------

|(5) |  | A wholly-owned subsidiary of Keystone Automotive Industries Resources, Inc.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
exhibit 32



             FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly report of CareDecision
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Cox, President/CEO, of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert Cox
--------------
Robert Cox
President/CEO
August 13, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/1/


             FORM OF SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
        SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly report of CareDecision
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Keith Berman, Treasurer/CFO, of the Company, certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Keith Berman
----------------
Keith Berman
Treasurer/CFO
August 13, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/2/
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 392 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 392

  To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 with 
   regard to appointment of members of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 
                  Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

 Mr. Glenn (for himself and Mr. DeWine) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 with 
   regard to appointment of members of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 
                  Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEMBERSHIP OF THE DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE COMMISSION.

    Section 201(b) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 
1992 (16 U.S.C. 421ww-21) is amended in each of paragraphs (2), (4), 
(5), (6), and (7) by striking ``from recommendations'' and inserting 
``after consideration of recommendations''.
                                 <all>
```
II

Calendar No. 559

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 199

[Report No. 104–349]

To repeal certain provisions of law relating to trading with Indians.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 11 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. KYL (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

AUGUST 1, 1996

Reported by Mr. MCCAIN, without amendment

A BILL

To repeal certain provisions of law relating to trading with

Indians.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL.

4 (a) REPEAL.—Section 437 of title 18, United States

5 Code, is repealed.
2

S 199 RS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The analysis for

2 chapter 23 of title 18, United States Code, is amended

3 by striking the item relating to section 437.
Calendar No. 559

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 199

[Report No. 104–349]

A BILL

To repeal certain provisions of law relating to

trading with Indians.

AUGUST 1, 1996

Reported without amendment
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert O. Carr, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company. 

This certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350 and is not deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever. 

Date: November 8, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 32.1


Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002


10-Q




| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                                                                                                                                                          
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/ William D. GreenWilliam D. Green
    Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd,
    General Partner of Accenture SCA
    (principal executive officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00645-CV

Bob Bennett a/d/a Robert S. Bennett 

v.

Kelly Coghlan, Coghlan & Associates, Richard and Janice Pullman as Guardians of Michael 

Pullman, and Winn Beaudry & Winn, LLP

NO. 759593 IN THE CO CIVIL CT AT LAW NO 2 OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

RPT RECORD

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

$2,056.00

$175.00

$20.00

10/11/2014

08/08/2014

08/08/2014

PAID

PAID

PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$2,251.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this February 27, 2015.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Dale E. Parker, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Appleton Papers Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):



a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



May 18, 2005



|           |  |                                                          
|---------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|           | 
|Signature: |  | /s/ Dale E. Parker                                       
|           |  | Dale E. Parker Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
From: Wayland, Robertj

Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 4:04 PM

To: Cortney Higgins

Cc: Tsirigotis, Peter; Srivastava, Ravi; Culligan, Kevin

Subject: 111(d) Support Materials

Cortney –

Please find attached to this email the remaining support documents for the 111(d) and 111(b) regulatory packages. The Legal Memorandum/TSD is not included in this submission, but should be coming over tomorrow along with the 111(b) regulatory package. If you have any questions, or think I’ve missed anything (which is always possible!), don’t hesitate to give either Kevin or me a

call.

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Office: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt

*************************************

<< GHG Abatement Measures TSD-Chapter 3_04-14-14.docx >> << GHG Abatement Measures TSD-Chapter 4_04-14-14.docx >> << GHG Abatement Measures TSD-Chapter 5_04-10-14.docx >> << GHG Abatement Measures TSD-Chapter 7_04-04-14.docx >> << GHG Abatement Measures TSD-Appendix 5-5_04-10-14.xlsx>> << Net Energy Output Monitoring & Reporting TSD_04-08-14.docx >> << Part 75 Monitoring & Reporting TSD_04-11-14.docx >> << Projecting Emission Performance TSD_04-10-14.docx >> << Resource Adequacy and Reliability TSD_04-10-14.docx >>
<< State Plan Considerations TSD_04-10-14.docx >> << State Goal Computation TSD-Appendices 1 & 2_04-01-14.xlsx >> << State Plan Considerations TSD-Appendix_04-03-14.docx >>
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated March 7, 2017, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-215489) of Smart Trust 299,
comprising Smart Trust, CEFA Select BDC Trust, Series 9.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


March 7, 2017
EXHIBIT 12

FIRST REPUBLIC PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION

(A Majority Owned Subsidiary of First Republic Bank)

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                 |  |                                                   |  |                                |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |       
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ----- | ---- | - | ----- |  | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                 |  | Three MonthsEndedSeptember 30,                    |  | Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
|($ in thousands) |  | 2006                                              |  | 2005                           |       | 2006 |   | 2005 
|I.               |  | Earnings:                                         |  |                                |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |       
|                 |  | Net income                                        |  | $                              | 4,709 |      | $ | 4,048 |  | $ | 13,507 |  | $ | 11,980
|                 |  | Fixed charges excluding preferred stock dividends |  |                                |      |      |   |      |  |   |       |  |   |      
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                                |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |       
|                 |  | Earnings before fixed charges                     |  | $                              | 4,709 |      | $ | 4,048 |  | $ | 13,507 |  | $ | 11,980
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                                |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |       
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                                |      
|II.              |  | Fixed charges:                                    |  |                                |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |       
|                 |  | Preferred stock dividends                         |  | $                              | 3,563 |      | $ | 3,563 |  | $ | 10,689 |  | $ | 10,689
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                                |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |       
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                                |      
|III.             |  | Ratios of earnings to fixed charges               |  |                                | 1.32x |      |   | 1.14x |  |   | 1.26x  |  |   | 1.12x 
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                                |       |      |   |       |  |   |        |  |   |