alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### H. W. MARVIN, Appellant, v. Marie A. BLANFORD et al., Appellees. Marie A. BLANFORD et al., Appellants, v. H. W. MARVIN, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 14, 1955.

Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, Robt. P. Hobson, Louisville, James A. Hall, La-Grange, for appellant and cross-appellee.

Thomas F. Manby, Clark & Manby, La-Grange, Edward A. Dodd, Dodd & Dodd, Louisville, for appellee and cross-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was not filed under KRS 21.080, but since the amount actually involved is less than $2,500 we are treating it as if it had been filed under that statute. The judgment appealed from covered three promissory notes, one for $2,500 and two for $600 each, or a total of $3,700, less a credit of $505.59, leaving a net balance of $3,194.41. The appellant contends that the $505.59 credit should have been for $600, thus leaving at issue the net amount of $94.41. Further credit of $83.58 was allowed which the appellant maintains should' have been for the amount of $1,847.74, thus leaving the net amount in dispute o£ $1,764.16 on this item. The trial court allowed $212.70 for grazing a second consignment of cattle, and the appellant claims the court should have allowed $355.16 for this item. However, the appellees and' cross-appellants contend nothing should have been allowed for this item. Thus, there is a dispute over $355.16 concerning, this particular credit. The three net amounts in dispute on this appeal, $94.41, $1,764.16 and $355.16, amount to a total of $2,213.73.

We have examined the record and conclude that the trial court’s findings were substantially correct, CR 52.01, and the judgment is affirmed on both the appeal and the cross-appeal.
#### Ex parte Darrel D. DONAHOO.

No. 30346.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 12, 1958.

No attorney for relator.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

MORRISON, Presiding Judge.

Relator, an inmate of the Texas Prison System, seeks his release by writ of habeas corpus alleging that the sentence by virtue of which he is confined is void because he waived a jury and entered his plea of guilty to the capital offense of robbery with firearms. He supports his application with certified copies of the indictment and judgment, which support his contention.

The trial court has certified that relator’s contention is true and that the judgment is void. Ex parte Traxler, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 661, 184 S.W.2d 286; Ex parte Stewart, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 479, 236 S.W.2d 799; Kemp v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 110, 261 S.W.2d 573; and Ex parte Padgett, 161 Tex.Cr.R. 498, 278 S.W.2d 865.

It is ordered that relator be relieved from further confinement in the penitentiary and that he be delivered by the penitentiary authorities to the Sheriff of Dal-lam County to answer in the 69th District Court of such county to the indictment in said cause under which his conviction was had.

It is so ordered.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8242]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02441]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-23-007]

Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: February 15, 2024 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Commission vote on Inv. No. 731-TA-679 (Fifth Review) (Stainless 
Steel Bar from India). The Commission currently is scheduled to 
complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on 
February 23, 2024.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory and 
Hearings Information Officer, 202-205-2000.
    The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, 
subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 
may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. Earlier 
notification of meeting was not possible.

    By order of the Commission,

    Issued: February 1, 2024.
Sharon Bellamy,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-02441 Filed 2-2-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 8226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4682-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Washington; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Washington (FEMA-4682-DR), dated January 12, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on January 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Lance E. Davis, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Toney L. Raines as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-02367 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. These meetings will primarily take place at NSF's headquarters, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

                    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an individual basis in the                     **Federal Register**                    . NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF website:                     *https://new.nsf.gov/​events/​proposal-review-panels.*

This information may also be requested by telephoning 703/292-8687.

Dated: February 1, 2024.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-02335 Filed 2-5-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Guangshen Railway Company Limited

The following table lists information concerning the significant subsidiaries of Guangshen Railway Company Limited, or the Company, as of December 31,
2013:



|                                                                             |  |                         |  |                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Name                                                                         |  | Country ofIncorporation |  | Percentage ofInterest held by theCompany
|Guangshen Railway Station Dongqun Trade and Commerce Service Company Limited |  | PRC                     |  | 100%                                    
|Shenzhen Fu Yuan Enterprise Development Company Limited                      |  | PRC                     |  | 100%                                    
|Shenzhen Guangshen Railway Travel Service Limited                            |  | PRC                     |  | 100%                                    
|Shenzhen Pinghu Qun Yi Railway Store Loading and Unloading Company Limited   |  | PRC                     |  | 100%                                    
|Dongguan Changsheng Enterprise Company Limited                               |  | PRC                     |  | 51%                                     
|Shenzhen Railway Station Passenger Services Company Limited                  |  | PRC                     |  | 100%                                    
|Guangzhou Tielian Economy Development Company Limited                        |  | PRC                     |  | 50.5%                                   
|Shenzhen Nantie Construction Supervision Company Limited                     |  | PRC                     |  | 76.7%                                   
|Guangzhou Railway Huangpu Service Company Limited                            |  | PRC                     |  | 100%                                    
|Shenzhen Guangshen Railway Economic and Trade Enterprise Company Limited     |  | PRC                     |  | 100%                                    
|Shenzhen Railway Property Management Company Limited                         |  | PRC                     |  | 100%                                    
|Shenzhen Shenhuasheng Storage and Transportation Company Limited             |  | PRC                     |  | 100%
AFS-13-426-E

October 23, 2013

Ms. Caitlin M. Randles

Supervisor, FAA Coordination

The Boeing Company

P.O. Box 3707

Seattle, WA 98124

Dear Ms. Randles:

This letter is in response to your June 19, 2013, petition to extend Exemption No. 9531

(Docket No. FAA-2001-8987). The exemption provided relief from § 91.515(a)(1) of Title 14 

Code of Federal Regulations, which describes flight altitude requirements for operating under 

Visual Flight Rules.

We have reviewed the history of § 91.515 and find that Amendment 91-211 reorganized and 

realigned the general operating and flight rules to make them more understandable and easier 

to use. Part of that effort included a new Subpart J – Waivers, which established policy and 

procedures for the Administrator to issue a certificate of waiver authorizing the operation of 

aircraft in deviation from any rule listed in Subpart J if the Administrator finds that the 

proposed operation can be safely conducted under the terms of that certificate of waiver. The 

list of rules that may be considered for a waiver can be found in § 91.905 and includes 

§ 91.515 – the section from which we previously issued Exemption No. 9531, as amended.

We have enclosed a copy of Advisory Circular 91-72, which provides information concerning 

the submission of applications for the issuance of waivers and FAA Form 77112, Application 

for Certificate of Waiver or Authorization. Please complete the form and submit it to your 

local Flight Standards District Office.
2

Because the relief you seek is more appropriately handled under the policy and procedures for 

issuance of a waiver, we will take no further action on your petition. If you have any 

questions or concerns you may contact your local Flight Standards District Office directly.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ANGELA LAY,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-2692

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed September 14, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal

A Case of Original Jurisdiction. 

Mike Graves, Public Defender, and 

Amanda Sizemore, Assistant Public 

Defender, Ocala, for Petitioner.

No Appearance for Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the July 9, 2018 order on 

motion to mitigate and the July 10, 2018 amended judgment and sentence rendered in

Case No. 2016-CF-1928, in the Circuit Court in and for Marion County, Florida. See

Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D). 

PETITION GRANTED.

COHEN, C.J., and ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Lawrence J. Finn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Terax Energy, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and
we have:

a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: May 15, 2006

/s/ Lawrence J. Finn Lawrence J. Finn 
  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and 
  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

---
Exhibit
23.1   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-05111, 333-33013, 333-42073, 333-81687,
333-90791, 333-37958, 333-55314, 333-81872, 333-103481 and 333-83462), Form S-3
(File Nos. 333-08519 and 333-101475) and Form S-4 (File No. 333-73382) of
WellPoint Health Networks Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2003, except
Note 24 as to which the date is March 5, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.     /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPLos Angeles, CaliforniaMarch
  26, 2003
<PAGE>


                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                          AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER


This Second Amendment (the "Amendment") to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the
"Agreement")  dated as of July 9, 1998, by and among  Cerulean,  Inc., a Georgia
corporation ("Cerulean"), WellPoint Health Networks Inc., a Delaware corporation
("WellPoint") and Water Polo Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation ("WPAC"),
is  dated as of  December  31,  1999.  Capitalized  terms  used  herein  and not
otherwise defined shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.

                                   WITNESSETH

         WHEREAS, Cerulean,  WellPoint and WPAC have previously entered into the
Agreement,  pursuant to which  Cerulean  would merge with and into WPAC upon the
terms and conditions set forth therein; and

         WHEREAS, Cerulean, WellPoint and WPAC entered into a First Amendment to
the Agreement dated July 9, 1999 ("First Amendment") amending Section 7.01(b) of
the Agreement to provide that the  Agreement  may be  terminated  and the Merger
contemplated  thereby may be  abandoned  by either  Cerulean or WellPoint if the
Merger  shall not have been  consummated  on or before  December 31, 1999 (which
date was elected by WellPoint and Cerulean pursuant to the First Amendment); and

         WHEREAS,  Cerulean,  WellPoint  and WPAC  desire  further  to amend the
Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.

                                    AGREEMENT

         NOW,  THEREFORE,  in consideration of the mutual  agreements  contained
herein, and upon and subject to the terms and conditions  hereinafter set forth,
the parties do hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Section  7.01(b)  of the  Agreement,  as it read  prior to the
                  First  Amendment,  shall be amended by deleting the words "the
                  one year anniversary of this Agreement" and inserting in their
                  place the words  "December  31,  2000."  This  Section 1 shall
                  supersede Section 1 of the First Amendment.

         2.       Except as set forth in this  Amendment,  the  Agreement  shall
                  remain unmodified and shall continue in full force and effect.


<PAGE>


         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  each of the  parties  hereof  have  caused  this
  Amendment to be duly executed on its behalf as of the date indicated above.

                            CERULEAN COMPANIES, INC.


                            By: /s/ Hugh J. Stedman
                               ---------------------------

                            WELLPOINT HEALTH NETWORKS INC.


                            By: /s/ Thomas C. Geiser
                               ---------------------------

                            WATER POLO ACQUISITION CORP.


                            By: /s/ Thomas C. Geiser
                               ---------------------------
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40725 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
ANSELMO MEDINA

- CABRERA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:13

- CR

- 1000

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Anselmo Medina

- Cabrera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Medina

- Cabrera has filed a re sponse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as
Medina

- Cabrera ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1 7, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40725 Document: 00513082986 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2015No. 14

- 40725

2 appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordin gly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40725 Document: 00513082986 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2015