alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 418 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 418

  To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to extend, improve, increase 
  flexibility, and increase conservation benefits of the conservation 
                reserve program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 14 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

 Mr. Conrad (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Wellstone, and Mr. Baucus) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to extend, improve, increase 
  flexibility, and increase conservation benefits of the conservation 
                reserve program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Conservation Reserve Program 
Extension Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM.

    Chapter 1 of subtitle D of title XII of the Food Security Act of 
1985 (16 U.S.C. 3830 et seq.) is amended by striking ``1995'' each 
place it appears in section 1230(a), subsections (a), (b)(3), and (d) 
of section 1231, and section 1232(c) and inserting ``2005''.

SEC. 3. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF CONTRACT OFFERS.

    Paragraph (3) of section 1234(c) of the Food Security Act of 1985 
(16 U.S.C. 3834(c)(3)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(3) In determining the acceptability of contract offers, the 
Secretary shall, to the extent practicable--
            ``(A) consider the extent that enrollment of the land that 
        is the subject of the contract offer would provide 
        environmental benefits, using criteria that, as determined by 
        the Secretary, give equal weight to improvement of soil 
        quality, improvement of water quality, and improvement of 
        wildlife habitat; and
            ``(B) establish different criteria in various States and 
        regions of the United States if, as determined by the 
        Secretary, the establishment of different criteria would 
        improve water quality or wildlife habitat or abate erosion.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7292 WILLIE JUNIOR HINES, a/k/a Willie Hines, Jr., Petitioner - Appellant, versus RICHARD E. BAZZLE, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:06-cv-01530-GRA) Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 8, 2006 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Junior Hines, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* In June 2006, prior to Hines’ timely appeal in this case, Hines filed a motion for authorization to file a second or successive § 2254 petition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000). Hines raised the same issues presented in his second § 2254 petition. This Court denied authorization. SeeIn re Hines , No. 06-461 (4th Cir. July 11, 2006) (unpublished order). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Willie Junior Hines seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to treat Hines’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as successive and dismiss the petition without prejudice on that basis. * The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hines has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal- 3 - contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AFPM Meeting Summary 

TO: 

FROM: 

PARTICIPANTS: 

DATE OF CALL: 

SUBJECT: 

Summary 

EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0682 

Brenda Shine, Eric Goehl U.S. EPA, OAQPS/SPPD/Refining and Chemicals 

Group (E143-01) 

See attached sign-in sheet for a list of all meeting participants 

June 24, 2014 

Discuss the Proposed Standards of the Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule 

• Ms. Shine informed all participants the proposed rule is set to be published in the Federal 

Register June 30, 2014. 

• Ms. Shine also indicated all of the technical memorandums are in the public docket which 

will be opened to the public upon the publication date. 

• Industry asked if a red line version of the rule with be available to the public, Ms. Shine 

stated that this will be posted to the refinery website upon the publication date of the rule. 

• Industry representatives asked about the length of the comment period and if there wou'ld 

be an extension past 60 days. Ms. Shine indicated that they should request an extension but 

as a reminder EPA has limited time between proposal and promulgation due to the consent 

decree final deadline of April17, 2014. 

• Industry representatives had questions about several areas of the proposed standards 

including. 

o Fenceline monitoring 

o Delayed cokers 

o Flares 

• Industry representatives asked about meeting again before the end of the comment period, 

proposed date during the week of July 2Pt. 
MEETING SIGN-IN SHEET 

l;eting ~ate: June 24,2014 

ce/Room: E201 - -

AFPM Meeting 

Name I Company Phone E-Mail --t--

/hle~o -=-----

<)feve. Moyer __ HoUt rrot1+,·er 

~rv f1liU7rmJ_ t!Ff !Y1 

/~ !±~ _NofZAA:~)__ t> £t_c1L 

21~-601 ..Jf'll/7 f?t~ff!__l!_o_/.9•f~V{j~,6 ,co 

?16 -58~ I 1!7 Sl-<-vt. Atoter @ U,/}7 F,,h;r. C I 

'Zo~ 55)-fiY~/ &o ·A .d .. _ A en 

------1 rr' CUA~' ~f\ ·r'll'1 · or7 

B)teNoA SruNi" EVA _ 

RcH/T SHARMA Lto,v:;£LLBAS£lL 

l5'· ?b-ly()z. Mll(_e.YJ~~?JYied._e.(el<u ?· c 

li.2tr z.ffl .;~~ 6 ri!wf. l! 

111-lo1-1t>/ RoHtr. SHAK.ItfA@J.YoNIJcL/..5 tsEtt. --- - U!,A1 

A!Ldr --~tt-L~_q~.: _ fA ____ '1 t1-6'ii-40J ~ o~~c~~~r Jl_f!J_.r_«,)~ ~ ._.:0/ 

r::._ ~c bh.J £Pfl I~ 2HI-l}~T1 oc ~~~""i~~.S:~~~I{_ __ _ 

ANI()-y~ac E/f/1 _ _ P, f -..P// -JJly;? L~fo-/P~~P-fo' Al+ D;e.VY\ _ EPA <"11 :i_ 54-1 ~5 ~;~Wl a.+ @e.ro--- ·3"v' _ 

Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 335 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 335

                    For the relief of Joe W. Floyd.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 2 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                    For the relief of Joe W. Floyd.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR RETIRED PAY.

    (a) Eligibility.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, Joe 
W. Floyd of Holcomb, Mississippi, shall be deemed to have performed 20 
years of qualifying service for purposes of determining his eligibility 
for retired pay under sections 12731 and 12732 of title 10, United 
States Code.
    (b) Requirement for Application.--The individual referred to in 
subsection (a) shall, after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
submit an application in the form and manner provided for payment of 
retired pay under section 12732 of title 10, United States Code.
    (c) Prospective Applicability.--Retired pay shall be paid under 
section 12731 of title 10, United States Code, to the individual 
referred to in subsection (a) only for months beginning after the date 
on which the application for the retired pay is submitted in accordance 
with subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
---

EXHIBIT 6

Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Viceroy Exploration
Ltd. (the "Registrant") on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the
"Annual Report"), I, Patrick G. Downey, Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                     
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                          
| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
      operations of the Registrant.

| | By:    | Patrick G. Downey    
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Patrick G. Downey      
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | March 21, 2006         

This certification accompanies the Annual Report pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of
Section. 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

---
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (“GlobeTrac”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John daCosta,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of GlobeTrac, certify, pursuant to s.906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of GlobeTrac.




*/s/
      John daCosta*


John
      daCosta


Chief
      Executive Officer




November
      14, 2006







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (“GlobeTrac”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John daCosta,
      Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of GlobeTrac, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of GlobeTrac.








*/s/
      John daCosta*


John
      daCosta


Chief
      Financial Officer






November
      14, 2006
MEMORANDUM

TO: Heavy Duty GHG Docket FROM: Steven Silverman, Attorney RE: Meeting with EPA staff and representatives of various environmental advocacy groups Jan. 6, 2011

On January 6, 2011, various members of EPA staff met with representatives of major environmental groups (ICCT, NRDC, EDF, UCC among them) to discuss these groups’ concerns and prospective comments on the proposed rules establishing greenhouse gas standards for heavy duty vehicles and engines. A sign up sheet of attendees is attached to this memorandum. Also attached is the paper presented to EPA at the meeting summarizing these groups’ concerns with aspects of the proposal . There was some substantive dis cussion of the issues prese nted, centering on timing of standards to redesign cycles (for standards for 2b/3 vehicles) and accommodating the diversity of vehicles within a segment (standards for vocational vehicles).
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas J. Ferree, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paperweight Development Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2007



|           |  |                                      
|---------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Thomas J. Ferree                 
|           |  | Thomas J. Ferree                     
|           |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Gussie Lee THOMAS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 37760.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1965.

No attorney of record on appeal, for appellant.

Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., James H. Miller and W. John Allison, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, enhanced by two prior convictions for felony theft, life.

The record contains no statement of facts.

Two formal bills of exception found in the record were not filed within 90 days after notice of appeal, as required by Art. 760d Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., hence they cannot be considered.

The proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Curis, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel R. Passeri, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Dated: April 29,
2005



/s/    DANIEL R. PASSERIDaniel R. Passeri President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
annual report on Form 10-K/A of MeriStar Hospitality Corporation (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                 
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Date: April 28, 2006 |  | /s/ Paul W. Whetsell            
|                     |  | Paul W. Whetsell                
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer         
|                     |  | MeriStar Hospitality Corporation
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 461

To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued hydroelectric

license.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 22, 1995

Mr. GORTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize extension of time limitation for a FERC-issued

hydroelectric license.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding the time limitation of section 13 of

4 the Federal Power Act, the Federal Energy Regulatory

5 Commission, upon the request of the licensee for FERC

6 Project No. 3701, is authorized, in accordance with the

7 good faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements

8 of section 13 and the Commission’s procedures under such

9 section, to extend until May 31, 2001, the time required

10 for the licensee to commence the construction of such
2

S 461 IS

1 project. This section shall take effect for the project upon

2 the expiration of the extension (issued by the Commission

3 under section 13) of the period required for commence4 ment of construction of such project. If the license for

5 FERC Project 3701 should expire prior to the date of en6 actment of this Act, the Commission is authorized and di7 rected to reinstate effective June 1, 1995, the license pre8 viously issued for such project, to extend until May 31,

9 2001, the time required for the licensee to commence the

10 construction of such project.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 392 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 62
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 392

                          [Report No. 104-39]

  To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 with 
   regard to appointment of members of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 
                  Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

 Mr. Glenn (for himself and Mr. DeWine) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 with 
   regard to appointment of members of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 
                  Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEMBERSHIP OF THE DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE COMMISSION.

    Section 201(b) of the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 
1992 (16 U.S.C. 421ww-21) is amended in each of paragraphs (2), (4), 
(5), (6), and (7) by striking ``from recommendations'' and inserting 
``after consideration of recommendations''.

                                                        Calendar No. 62

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 392

                          [Report No. 104-39]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992 with 
   regard to appointment of members of the Dayton Aviation Heritage 
                  Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

                       Reported without amendment
```