8162 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices 

1See Strontium Chromate from France: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022; 88 FR 75556 

(November 3, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Strontium Chromate from Austria and 

France: Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 65349 

(November 27, 2019) (Order). 

3For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

4See Order, 84 FR at 65350. 

12. Goodluck India Ltd. 

13. GVN Fuels Ltd. 

14. Fiber Tech Composite Pvt. Ltd. 

15. Hydromatik. 

16. Jindal Quality Tubular Ltd. 

17. KLT Automatic & Tubular Products Ltd. 

18. Lloyds Line Pipes Ltd.; Lloyds Metals & 

Engineers Limited. 

19. MARINEtrans India Private Ltd. 

20. Patton International Ltd. 

21. Raajratna Ventures Ltd. 

22. Ratnamani Metals Tubes Ltd. 

23. SAR Transport Systems Pvt. Ltd. 

24. Surya Global Steel Tubes Ltd. 

25. Vallourec Heat Exchanger Tubes Ltd. 

26. Welspun India Ltd. 

27. Zenith Birla (India) Ltd. 

28. Zenith Birla Steels Private Ltd. 

29. Zenith Dyeintermediates Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02295 Filed 2–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–427–830] 

Strontium Chromate From France: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

sales of strontium chromate from France 

by Socie ́te ́ Nouvelle des Couleurs 

Zinciques (SNCZ) were not made at less 

than normal value (NV) during the 

period of review (POR) November 1, 

2021, through October 31, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable February 6, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jonathan Schueler, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VIII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–9175. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results on November 3, 2023 and 

invited interested parties to comment.1

No interested party submitted 

comments. Accordingly, the final results 

are unchanged from the Preliminary 

Results. Commerce conducted this 

review in accordance with section 

751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 2

The product covered by this Order is 

strontium chromate from France. For a 

full description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Results. 

Final Results of Review 

As no parties submitted comments 

regarding the Preliminary Results, 

Commerce made no changes to its 

determinations for the final results of 

this review. As a result of this review, 

we determine the following weightedaverage dumping margin exists for the 

POR: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Socie ́te ́ Nouvelle des Couleurs 

Zinciques ................................. 0.00 

Disclosure 

Because Commerce received no 

comments on the Preliminary Results, 

we have not modified our analysis and 

no decision memorandum accompanies 

this Federal Register notice. We are 

adopting the Preliminary Results as the 

final results of this review. 

Consequently, there are no new 

calculations to disclose in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b) for these final 

results. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Where the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is either zero 

or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent), we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Accordingly, because SNCZ’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero percent, 

we will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by SNCZ 

included in these final results of review 

for which the reviewed company did 

not know that the merchandise it sold 

to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, 

trading company, or exporter) was 

destined for the United States. In such 

instance, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.3

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective for all shipments of the 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for SNCZ will be equal 

to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this administrative review (i.e., 0.00 

percent); (2) for merchandise exported 

by a producer or exporter not covered in 

this review but covered in a prior 

segment of the proceeding, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the producer or 

exporter participated; (3) if the exporter 

is not a firm covered in this review, a 

prior review, or the original less-thanfair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of the proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers and exporters will continue 

to be 32.16 percent ad valorem, the allothers rate established in the LTFV 

investigation.4 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 6, 2024 / Notices 8163 

1See Certain Steel Nails from Malaysia: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments; 2021–2022, 88 FR 

51775 (August 4, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 51776. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated November 17, 2023. 

4As in the last completed administrative review, 

in this administrative review, Commerce continues 

to treat Region International Co. Ltd. and Region 

System Sdn. Bhd. (collectively, Region) as a 

collapsed single entity, and to treat Inmax Sdn. 

Bhd. and Inmax Industries Sdn. Bhd. (collectively, 

Inmax) as a collapsed single entity. See, e.g., Certain 

Steel Nails from Malaysia: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 87 FR 5794 (February 2, 2022). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the 2021–2022 Administrative 

Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain 

Steel Nails from Malaysia,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

6 Id. at 1–2. 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and the terms of an APO is 

a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: January 29, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2024–02292 Filed 2–5–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–557–816] 

Certain Steel Nails From Malaysia: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

certain steel nails (nails) from Malaysia 

were sold at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR), July 

1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable February 6, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Drury or Tyler Weinhold, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–1121, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 4, 2023, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2021–2022 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on nails from 

Malaysia.1 We invited interested parties 

to comment on the Preliminary Results.2

On November 17, 2023, we extended the 

deadline for these final results until 

January 31, 2024.3 This review covers 

two mandatory respondents: Region and 

Inmax.4 The producers/exporters not 

selected for individual examination are 

referenced in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Review’’ section below and listed in 

Appendix II of this notice. For a 

complete description of the events that 

followed the Preliminary Results, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the scope of 

the order are nails from Malaysia. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs filed by interested parties 

in this review are discussed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the topics included in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

as Appendix I to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is made available to the 

public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that Astrotech Steels Private 

Limited, Trinity Steel Private Limited, 

Geekay Wires Limited, and Modern 

Factory for Steel Industries Co. Ltd., 

made no shipments of the subject 

merchandise to the United States during 

the POR. No parties commented on this 

determination. Therefore, for the final 

results of review, we continue to find 

that these companies made no 

shipments of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POR. 

Consistent with our practice, we will 

issue appropriate instructions to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

based on our final results. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received from 

interested parties regarding our 

Preliminary Results, we made certain 

changes to the margin calculation 

methodology used in the Preliminary 

Results and have changed the dumping 

margin for these final results of review, 

as discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for companies 

which were not selected for individual 

examination in an administrative 

review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of 

the Act, the all-others rate is normally 

‘‘an amount equal to the weighted 

average of the estimated weightedaverage dumping margins established 

for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

In this review, we preliminarily 

calculated a weighted-average dumping 

margin for Region that is not zero, de 

minimis, or determined entirely on the 

basis of facts available, but calculated a 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1