SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST

( In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: Maryland Department of the Environment

Date Submitted: May 17, 2011

Subject: SIP revision to incorporate pre

- construction p ermitting requirements for EGU’s

Completeness Review

Completed by: David Talley

Date Completed: 7/12/11

Administrative Materials

ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his

des ignee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision

thereof. 1. Letter from Dr. Robert M. Summers, Secretary of MDE X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code

or body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent

agr eement in final form. That evidence shall include the date

of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the

plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date.

Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree

has a sunset or expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a

SIP submission. 2. SIP revision includes MDE regulations, PSC

regulations, and portions of the Public Utility Company

Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland

MDE regulations effective 11/16/09

PSC sta tute effective 2/20/08

PSC regulations effective as follows:

COMAR 20.79.01 effective 12/28/09

COMAR 20.79.02 and 20.79.03 effective 2/10/97,

revised portions revised on 11/8/04 X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal au thority

under State law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. Maryland Register Notices X

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for 4. Included XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including

indication of the changes made to the exist ing approved plan,

where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official

State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the

appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable

by the State. The effective date of the regulati on/document

shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself.

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural

requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting

and completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. Included. Proof of public notice, hearings, public

comment. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed

change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including

the date of publication of such notice. 6. Maryland Register n otices of proposed actions. X

7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance

with the information provided in the public notice and the

State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. Included. Hearing Record from April 13, 2011. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response

thereto. 8. No comments received X

Technical Materials

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affec ted by the plan. 1. All regulated pollutants from EGUs X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including

the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations

and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Elec tric Generating units statewide

X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions

from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current

actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate,

quantification of changes in act ual emissions from affected

sources through calculations of the differences between certain

baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result

of the revision. 3. N/A XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air

quality stand ards, prevention of significant deterioration

increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and

visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved

and implemented. 4. The proposed regulations will enhance the currently

approved progra m in Maryland. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed

revision, including input data, output data, models used,

ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used,

justification for use of offsite data (where used), mo des of

models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the

determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. N/A X

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are

based on continuous emission reduction technology. 6. N/A X

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work

practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements,

where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 7. N/A X

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how

compliance will be determined in practice. 8. N/A X

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by

any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate,

explain why.) 9. N/A X

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a

maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant

NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. N/A X