alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-01-0276-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JULY 13, 2001

	______________________________

	IN RE CARL J. NICHOLS,

			Relator

	_________________________________

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

	Pending before the court is a “Motion for Filing” tendered by Carl J. Nichols (Nichols).  Though the motion is rather vague, it nevertheless appears that he requests us to order the Potter County district clerk to file his “Petition Initiating Judicial Review.”1  And, because he asks that we compel the district clerk to accept his petition, we deem the “Motion for Filing” a petition for a writ of mandamus and deny it.

	An intermediate appellate court has jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus against a district clerk only when necessary to enforce its jurisdiction over a pending appeal.  In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d 181,182 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st. Dist.] 1999, orig. proc.).  At bar, however, we have no pending appeal involving Nichols.  Nor would our directing the district clerk to file Nichols’ petition against the administration of the William P. Clements Unit serve to enforce our jurisdiction over any appeal pending before us.  Thus, we have no  jurisdiction to entertain Nichols’ request.

	Accordingly, the request of Nichols for a writ of mandamus directing the Potter County district clerk to accept his “Petition Initiating Judicial Review” is denied.

									Brian Quinn

									    Justice

Do not publish.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7319

SEBASTIAN MOORE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES HARDY,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,

District Judge. (5:06-hc-02193)

Submitted: December 13, 2007 Decided: December 20, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sebastian X. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sebastian X. Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion to

prepare a transcript at government expense, deny the motion for

sanctions, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTAUDITORS

 

We consent to the use of our report dated February 16, 2004 included inthis Annual Report  (Form 10-K) ofAirNet Systems, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 with respectto the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule ofAirNet Systems, Inc. included herein.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Forms S-8 No. 333-08189 and No. 333-62659) pertaining to the AirNetSystems, Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Incentive Stock Plan and theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43605) pertaining to the AirNetSystems, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated February 16, 2004,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statementschedule of AirNet Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) ofAirNet Systems, Inc.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-103050) of AirNet Systems, Inc. and in the relatedProspectus of our report dated February 16, 2004, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule ofAirNet Systems, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of AirNetSystems, Inc.

 
| /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| March 29, 2004            |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 24 (Monday, February 5, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 7717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02208]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP)--CE24-011, Grants To Support New Investigators in 
Conducting Research Related To Understanding Drug Use and Overdose Risk 
and Protective Factors (K01); Cancellation of Meeting

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of 
Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aisha L. Wilkes, M.P.H., Scientific 
Review Officer, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, 
Mailstop S106-9, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3717. Telephone: (404) 639-
6473; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99d8cef0f5f2fcead9fafdfab7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fbbaac9297909e88bb989f98d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given of a change in the 
meeting of the Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control 
Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--CE24-011, Grants to Support New 
Investigators in Conducting Research Related to Understanding Drug Use 
and Overdose Risk and Protective Factors (K01); Cancellation of 
Meeting; March 5, 2024, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., EST., in the original Federal 
Register notice FRN. The web conference was published in the Federal 
Register on Tuesday, October 24, 2023, 88 FR 73020.
    This meeting is being canceled in its entirety.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-02208 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8213

CARLOS R. MAYBERRY, The Ethnoreligious Order and Voomorphic 

Confraternity of the Black Mafia,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY MAYBERRY; CARLTON APPLEWHITE; L. BYNUM; NATACHA 

MAYBERRY; DAYENA CORCORAN; CHERIE PEAY; G. SCHROEDER; J. 

FIELDS; KUTCHERMAN; J. MOSS; NATHANIEL STANLEY, All 

defendants sued individually and in his or her official 

capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:09-cv-02366-WDQ)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos R. Mayberry, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Carlos R. Mayberry appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without 

prejudice for failure to comply with a court order to 

particularize his complaint. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), 

and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Mayberry seeks to 

appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory 

or collateral order. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers 

Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1067 (4th Cir. 1993). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Description of an EPA Significant Guidance Document 

EPA maintains a list of Significant Guidance Documents at http://www.epa.gov/regulations/guidance/ as called for 

by the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Final Bulletin for Agency Good Guidance Practices 

(http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2007/m07-07.pdf). Please be aware that the EPA list of Significant 

Guidance Documents does not include every guidance document issued by EPA and only encompasses those 

documents that are "significant" as defined by OMB’s Bulletin. 

This final document has been determined to be an EPA Significant Guidance Document per the OMB Bulletin 

definition and is included on the EPA list of significant guidance documents. OMB’s Bulletin directs agencies to 

allow for the public to submit comments on any Significant Guidance Document that appears on the agency’s list of 

significant guidance documents. EPA allows for public comments to be submitted through the Agency’s electronic 

docket and commenting system at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Please note that although you may receive an acknowledgement that EPA has received your comment, you may not 

receive a detailed response to your comment. Your feedback is nevertheless important to the EPA and will be 

forwarded to the appropriate program staff for consideration.
Exhibit
31




CERTIFICATION




I, Joel
Gardner, CEO and CFO, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Megola, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within the Company, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;




b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and




5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
January 26, 2009





/s/ JOEL GARDNERJoel
      GardnerCEO
      and CFO
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

Selisa Harkey and Adrian Harkey, * From the 358th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. D

- 134,928

Vs. No. 11

- 14

- 00050

- CV * May 8, 2014

The Bank of New York Mellon Trust * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
Company, N.A. et al., (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed. The costs incurre d by reason of this appeal are taxed against Selisa

Harkey and Adrian Harkey.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for applicable date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Bradley T. Smith, Director, tel.: 202-622-6922; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://ofac.treasury.gov/​*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action

On January 23, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.

## Individuals

      ( print page 7442)          ( print page 7443)          ( print page 7444)    
      ( print page 7445)    
Dated: January 23, 2024.

Bradley T. Smith,

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

[FR Doc. 2024-02052 Filed 2-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
# Diario Oficial C 181/2010

| | ISSN 1725-244X
  doi:10.3000/1725244X.C_2010.181.spa |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 181 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 53o año6 de julio de 2010 |

ISSN 1725-244X

doi:10.3000/1725244X.C_2010.181.spa

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 181

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

53o año6 de julio de 2010

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2010/C 181/01 | Fe de erratas de la versión consolidada del Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea de la Energía Atómica (DO C 84 de 30.3.2010) | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

2010/C 181/01

Fe de erratas de la versión consolidada del Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea de la Energía Atómica (DO C 84 de 30.3.2010)

1

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

6.7.2010

| 6.7.2010 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 181/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 181/1

---

FE DE ERRATAS

de la versión consolidada del Tratado constitutivo de la Comunidad Europea de la Energía Atómica

(

  «Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea» C 84 de 30 de marzo de 2010

  )

(2010/C 181/01)

Página 4, en el sumario, título VI:

Donde dice:

| «TÍTULO VI | Disposiciones finales |
| --- | --- |

«TÍTULO VI

debe decir:

debe decir:

| «TÍTULO VI | Disposiciones relativas al período inicial (Derogado) |
| --- | --- |

«TÍTULO VI

DISPOSICIONES FINALES

Página 14, artículo 17, apartado 1, bajo la letra b), inciso iv):

Desplazar hacia la izquierda el último párrafo («Los Estados miembros no podrán adoptar, para satisfacer estas necesidades, (...)») al mismo nivel que el párrafo primero para indicar claramente que se trata de un párrafo distinto y no de una parte de la letra b), inciso iv).

Desplazar hacia la izquierda el último párrafo («Los Estados miembros no podrán adoptar, para satisfacer estas necesidades, (...)») al mismo nivel que el párrafo primero para indicar claramente que se trata de un párrafo distinto y no de una parte de la letra b), inciso iv).

Página 56, título VI:

Donde dice:

Donde dice:

«TÍTULO VI

Artículos 209 a 223

(Derogados)

DISPOSICIONES FINALES»,

debe decir:

debe decir:

«TÍTULO VI

DISPOSICIONES RELATIVAS AL PERÍODO INICIAL

(Derogado)

Artículos 209 a 223

(Derogados)

DISPOSICIONES FINALES».

---
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 340 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 340

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study concerning 
 equity regarding entrance, tourism, and recreational fees for the use 
        of Federal lands and facilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             February 2 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study concerning 
 equity regarding entrance, tourism, and recreational fees for the use 
        of Federal lands and facilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL FACILITIES FEE EQUITY.

    (a) Policy.--It is the policy of Congress that entrance, tourism, 
and recreational use fees for the use of Federal lands and facilities 
not discriminate against any State or any region of the country.
    (b) Fee Study.--Not later than May 1, 1996, the Secretary of the 
Interior, in cooperation with the heads of other affected agencies, 
shall prepare and submit to Congress a report that--
            (1) identifies all Federal lands and facilities that 
        provide tourism or recreational use; and
            (2) analyzes by State and region any fees charged for 
        entrance to or for tourism or recreational use of Federal lands 
        and facilities in a State or region, individually and 
        collectively.
    (c) Recommendations.--Not later than May 1, 1997, the Secretary of 
the Interior, in cooperation with the heads of other affected agencies, 
shall prepare and submit to Congress any recommendations that the 
Secretary may have for implementing the policy stated in subsection 
(a).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
The Board of Directors
Southern Pacific Funding Corporation:
 
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-11075 and No. 333-11189) on Forms S-8 of Southern Pacific Funding
Corporation of our report dated January 23, 1997, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Southern Pacific Funding Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996, and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of
earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the
December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of Southern Pacific Funding
Corporation.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
Portland, Oregon
March 26, 1997
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 Joel P. Moskowitz
    
    Phil Bourdillon/Gene HellerChief Executive Officer
    
    Silverman Heller Associates(714) 549-0421, x8261
    
    (310) 208-2550
 CERADYNE, INC. RECEIVES $9.1 MILLION
BODY ARMOR DELIVERY ORDER
   www.ceradyne.com.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 0162

_____________________________
M AURICE W ILLIAMS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Martin A. Fitzpatrick , Judge

. June 5, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
M AKAR , W INOKUR , and W INSOR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Maurice Williams, pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### Jim LOWRY v. P. W. SMITHER.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Sept. 16, 1955.

Watts & Moynahan, Nicholasville, for appellant. -

William Hill Mackey, Nicholasville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

•Motion for an appeal from a judgment of the Jessamine Circuit Court, Honorable W. J. Baxter, Judge, ■ for $500, with interest, awarded appellee.

We have considered the entire record and have found no error prejudicial to the substantial rights of appellant.

The motion for an appeal is overruled and the judgment is affirmed.