alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       7,425,587
<SECURITIES>                                17,241,185
<RECEIVABLES>                                  470,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,082,375
<PP&E>                                         411,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,927,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,465,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,469
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,329,556
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,927,680
<SALES>                                      3,550,725
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,550,725
<CGS>                                           52,887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,159,344
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (116,818)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,455,312
<INCOME-TAX>                                   315,455
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,139,857
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,139,857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six months ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kronos Advanced
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





/s/ Daniel R. Dwight
-----------------------
    Daniel R. Dwight
    President and Chief
    Executive Officer


/s/ Daniel R. Dwight
------------------------
    Daniel R. Dwight
    Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
10.9


 


Taiwan
Cooperative Bank


To:
Da Teh Fu Enterprise Ltd.


 


Date
: Dec. 31, 2015


 


No.
104000551


 


Regarding
the application of loan credit line period extension, we had agreed and terms are as follows,


 


1.
Credit Line: NTD6,400,000.00


 


2.
Interest rate : adjustable rate , base on the savings deposit rate plus  2.38% annual rate (Current rate is 3.68%)


 


3.
Term: from Nov.17, 2015 for one year extension


 


4.
Payment : interest payment every month, each month pay  principle for NTD460,000.00, the principle balance to be pay off 
upon the loan expired.


 


5.
Collateral and guarantor:


 


		1.	Guarantor
                                         : Shu Hui Chou & Te Hsing Chou



 


		2.	Collateral
                                         supplier : Da Te Fu Enterprise Co., Ltd.、Si Her Wang and Lien An I Investment
                                         Co.,Ltd.






 


		3.	Collateral
                                         : Miao City, Kung Jing Sec. Land No. 904-1 etc. for 27 pieces land, total 1,730.60 pin
Exhibit 32.1



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
§1350, the undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |        |  |                                                
|------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                         |  |  |  |  |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  |                     
|                         |  |  |  |  | 
|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |        |  | /s/ Douglas P. Buth                            
|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Name:  |  | Douglas P. Buth                                
|                         |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Title: |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
$10,000 jurisdictional threshold limit.' 

### Buzz Stew, LLC, 124 Nev. at 227-

28, 181 P.3d at 672. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.

, C.J. Hardesty 

# 1 2atssita

r Parraguirre 

# ?n , a , J. Douglas

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge Lamaar Alexander McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth, LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

'Although the district court's order indicates that respondent's motion to dismiss was granted in its entirety, the only basis for the dismissal articulated in the order and at the hearing on the motion was the failure to meet the minimum jurisdictional threshold limit. J.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
1947A
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael D. Tanner, President and Chief Executive Officer and I, Mary
Beth Doubet, Secretary and Treasurer of Sports Information & Publishing Corp.
(the "Company") certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sports
Information & Publishing Corp.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.

Date: February 12, 2004


/s/ Michael D. Tanner
-------------------------------------
Michael D. Tanner,
President and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Mary Beth Doubet
-----------------------
Mary Beth Doubet,
Secretary and Treasurer
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-05111,
333-33013, 333-42073, 333-81687, 333-90791, 333-37958, 333-55314, 333-81872 and 333-83462), Form S-3 (File
No. 333-08519) and Form S-4 (File No. 333-73382) of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2002, except Note 3 as to which the
date is March 15, 2002, and Note 22 as to which the date is March 18, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 29, 2002 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Royal Acceptance Corporation and Subsidiary
as at and for the quarter ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          94,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,674,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,365,875
<PP&E>                                         106,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,162,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,129,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,698
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,101,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,162,293
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,388,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  499,622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             430,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                458,013
<INCOME-TAX>                                   178,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            280,013
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   280,013
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)


</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1512

___________

Kermit Robinson, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

McDonnell Douglas Corporation, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 5, 1998

 Filed: January 9, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kermit Robinson filed suit against McDonnell Douglas Corporation (MDC)

alleging age and race discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. MDC moved

for summary judgment, and Robinson failed to respond. The district court granted

MDC’s motion; Robinson now appeals. After careful review of the record and the

parties’ briefs, we conclude the district court correctly found no triable fact issues

existed and summary judgment was warranted. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

---

EXHIBIT 8.1

The following table sets forth a list
of our subsidiaries.

|Name of subsidiary              | Jurisdiction of incorporation
|------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Elbit Vision Systems US, Inc.  | Delaware                     
|Elbit Vision Systems B.V.      | Holland                      
|Yuravision Co. Ltd.*            | South Korea                  
|IRT ScanMaster Systems  Inc.    | United States                
|ScanMaster Systems (IRT) Ltd.  | Israel                       
|Panoptes Ltd.                  | Israel                       

 Wholly-owned * We hold 51.11% of the issued and
outstanding share capital of Yuravision, and have a legal obligation to purchase an
additional 18.8% from Yuravisions former shareholders.



---

---
<PAGE>


11.0        Computation of Per Share Loss


Earnings Per Share

         The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
("SFAS") No. 128 for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1998. SFAS No. 128 replaces
the presentation of primary and fully diluted earnings per share with a
presentation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share, if
dilutive shares are outstanding. Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and
is computed by dividing income or loss available to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted
earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were converted into common
stock, but such securities or contracts are excluded if their effects would be
anti-dilutive. Pursuant to the requirements of Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB")
No. 98 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, issued in February 1998,
common equivalent shares which have an anti-dilutive effect on net loss per
share are no longer included in computing net loss per share for the periods
presented. All prior-period loss per share data has been restated in accordance
with SFAS No. 128 and SAB No. 98.

         Basic loss per common share was calculated by dividing net loss by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
loss per share was calculated the same as basic loss per share since the Company
has a net loss for all periods presented which would make the conversion of
securities or other contracts to common stock anti-dilutive.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                    Year Ended
                                                                                                     March 31
                                                                                                 1998          1997
                                                                                             ----------     -------

                   <S>                                                                  <C>           <C>        
                             Net Loss                                                       (3,898,812)   (6,937,593)

                             Loss per common share - basic & diluted                              (.68)        (1.72)

                             Number of common shares - basic & diluted                       5,708,904     4,034,247


</TABLE>
                                       37
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Douglas P. Buth, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Appleton Papers Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 16, 2004



|           |  |                              
|---------- |  | -----------------------------
|           | 
|Signature: |  | /s/    DOUGLAS P. BUTH       
|           |  | Douglas P. Buth              
|           |  | Chairman, President and Chief
|           |  | Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JORGE M. NELSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 67 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of August, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Charles Hubert GUINN, alias Charles Hubert Quinn, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28269.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 25, 1956.

*584C. C, Divine, Houston, for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady and Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DICE, Commissioner.

Upon his plea of guilty before the court, appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary and assessed punishment at five years in the penitentiary.

Imposition of sentence was by the trial court deferred and appellant was placed upon probation under -the terms of the Adult Probation and Parole Law, Art. 781b, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P.

This is an appeal from an order revoking such probation and imposition of sentence under the judgment of conviction.

The statement of facts appearing in the record is shown to have been filed in the trial court after the ninety-day period allowed by Art. 759a, § 4, V.A.C.C.P., and therefore cannot be considered. White v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 254 S.W.2d 129; and Staley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 276 S.W.2d 278.

In the absence of a statement of facts, we are unable to pass upon appellant’s contention that the evidence was insufficient to authorize the court to revoke the probation — Lynch v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 267, 263 S.W.2d 158; nor the appellant’s complaint to the action of the court in overruling his motion for continuance. Barnes v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 78, 261 S.W.2d 597.

Appellant contends that the judgment of probation did not sufficiently specify the condition upon which the probation was granted.

The judgment ordered appellant released upon probation upon the following terms:

> “Terms Probation 1. Not to violate the law of this or any other State of 'the United States.”

The term of probation fixed in the judgment was sufficient under Section 3 of Art. 781b, supra, which authorizes the court to determine the terms and conditions of probation and provides that they may include that the probationer shall: (a) Commit no offense against the laws of this or any other State or the United States.

Appellant, for the first time on appeal, contends that the state’s motion to revoke the probation did not sufficiently allege how, when or where he had violated the law. The appellant, having failed to question the sufficiency of the motion in the trial court, is in no position to urge such contention on appeal.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kronos Advanced Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal nine months March 31, 2007 as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

      Date: May 18, 2007             By:      /s/ Daniel R. Dwight
                                                  ------------------------------
                                     Name:        Daniel R. Dwight
                                     Title:       Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sherb & Co., LLP and
will be retained by Sherb & Co. LLP and furnished to the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.