alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.3



CERTIFICATION



I, Mark R. Richards, President and Chief Executive Officer of Paperweight Development Corp., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Paperweight Development Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 14, 2005



|           |  |                                      
|---------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                 
|           |  | Mark R. Richards                     
|           |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,225
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,734
<PP&E>                                         101,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,715 
<BONDS>                                         16,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           215
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,446
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               175,173
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,534
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (16,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,938)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,189)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.47)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief executive officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended July 1, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 15, 2007 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40058

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS ARMANDO CRISTALES-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:10-CR-1025-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Armando Cristales-Hernandez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Cristales-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 21, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40058 Document: 00511640237 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 11-40058

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 11-40058 Document: 00511640237 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
S. 273

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the fourth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-five

An Act

To amend section 61h–6 of title 2, United States Code.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That section

61h–6 of title 2; The Congress, Chapter 4—Officers and Employees

of Senate and House of Representatives; United States Code, is

amended to read as follows:

‘‘§ 61h–6. Appointment of consultants by Majority Leader,

Minority Leader, Secretary of the Senate, and

Legislative Counsel of the Senate; compensation

‘‘(a) The Majority Leader and the Minority Leader, are each

authorized to appoint and fix the compensation of not more than

four individual consultants, on a temporary or intermittent basis,

at a daily rate of compensation not in excess of the per diem

equivalent of the highest gross rate of annual compensation which

may be paid to employees of a standing committee of the Senate.

The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to appoint and fix the

compensation of not more than two individual consultants, on a

temporary or intermittent basis, at a daily rate of compensation

not in excess of the per diem equivalent of the highest gross rate

of annual compensation which may be paid to employees of a

standing committee of the Senate. The Legislative Counsel of the

Senate (subject to the approval of the President pro tempore) is

authorized to appoint and fix the compensation of not more than

two consultants, on a temporary or intermittent basis, at a daily

rate of compensation not in excess of that specified in the first

sentence of this section. The provisions of section 8344 of title

5 shall not apply to any individual serving in a position under

this authority. Expenditures under this authority shall be paid

from the contingent fund of the Senate upon vouchers approved

by the President pro tempore, Majority Leader, Minority Leader,

Secretary of the Senate, or Legislative Counsel of the Senate, as

the case may be.
S. 273—2

‘‘(b) The Majority Leader, and the Minority Leader, in appointing individuals to consultant positions under authority of this section, may appoint one such individual to such position at an annual

rate of compensation rather than at a daily rate of compensation,

but such annual rate shall not be in excess of the highest gross

rate of annual compensation which may be paid to employees of

a standing committee of the Senate.’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 22 - 00093 - CV IN RE MOHAMMAD MAHMOOD , RELATOR ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

### April 19 , 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ. Relator Mohammad Mahmood, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court seeking to compel the Honorable Dan iel H. Mills, sitting by assignment as judge of the 368th District Court of Williamson County in trial court cause number 19 - 3679 - FC1 , to disqualify opposing counsel and recuse himself
. We dismiss the original proceeding for want of jurisdiction. Appellate courts may issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in its geographic district and may iss ue writs necessary to enforce its jurisdiction. T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(a), (b). Mahmood direct s his mandamus petition against the judge of the 368th District Court of Williamson County . The latter is2

not a cour t located within the geographic district for the Seventh Court of Appeals , but , instead , one located within the district of the Third Court of Appeals
. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.201 (d), (h)
. Thus, w e lack authority to issue a writ a mandamus against the judge of the 368t h District Court unless the writ is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction
. Although Mahmood has an appeal presently pending before this Court, i.e. In the Interest of A.M ., cause number 07 - 22 - 00011 - CV , t hat appeal was transferred from the Third Court of Appeals by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001. T he transfer did not carry with it any jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus in a sep arate original proceeding. See In re Barnes , No. 06 - 17 - 00042 - CV, 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 2784, at *2 (Tex. App.
— Texarkana Mar. 31, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) ; Misc. Docket No. 21 - 9153 (Tex. Dec. 22, 2021 ) (“ It is specifically provided that the cases ordered transferred by this Order shall, in each instance, not include original proceedings . . . . ”). And, Mahmood ha s not shown how the relief sought via the pending application for a writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction in cause number 07 - 2 2 - 000 11 - CV. See In re Jackson , No. 08 - 20 - 00026 - CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 1003, at *2 - 3 (Tex. App.
— El Paso Feb. 5, 2 020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (dismissing original proceeding where relator failed to show that mandamus was necessary to preserve the court’s appellate jurisdiction over a transferred appeal). For these reasons , we dismiss Mahmood’s petition for writ of mandamus and accompanying motion for temporary relief for want of jurisdiction
. Per Curiam Pirtle, J., concurs in the result.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 21, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41673

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM FERREIRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 2:04-CR-180-ALL

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Ferreira appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction of passing counterfeit money in violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 473. Ferreira’s contention that the district

court erroneously relied on his equivocal acceptance of responsibility as a basis for departure after giving him credit for acceptance of responsibility is without merit. The district court made
No. 04-41673

-2-

it plain that the departure was based on its conclusion that Ferreira’s criminal history category of VI did not adequately reflect

the seriousness of his criminal history or the likelihood of recidivism in light of his Ferreira’s forty criminal history points and

the similarity of the instant offense to past offenses. Underrepresentation of criminal history is a proper basis for departure.

United States v. Smith, 417 F.3d 483, 491 (5th Cir. 2005). 

As Ferreira contends, the district court did state that the

equivocal nature of his acceptance of responsibility when speaking

with the probation officer was another reason for departure. The

district court made it plain, however, that the criminal history

score was the primary reason supporting the departure and stated

that it would have imposed the same departure even if Ferreira had

been truthful when speaking to the probation officer. Thus, we

need not determine whether the court erred, because any purported

error was harmless. See United States v. Akpan, 407 F.3d 360, 376-

77 (5th Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Cade, 279 F.3d 265,

273 (5th Cir. 2002). 

Although Ferreira contends that the departure should be reviewed for reasonableness, he does not argue that the departure was

unreasonable; therefore, he has abandoned any such argument. See

United States v. Lucien, 61 F.3d 366, 370 (5th Cir. 1995). In any

event, the extent of the departure was reasonable. See Smith, 417

F.3d at 491-92. Accordingly, the judgment of sentence is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Royal Acceptance Corporation and Subsidiary
as at and for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         4,733
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,225,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,262,495
<PP&E>                                         193,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                 92,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 29,708,981
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,297,599
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       7,733
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   29,708,981
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,299,806
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,930,758
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                136,616
<INCOME-TAX>                                   60,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            76,616
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   76,616
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.02



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) 
of Applied Analytical Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated 
February 12, 1999 (except for Note 11, as to which the date is March 16, 1999),
included in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of Applied Analytical
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Applied Analytical 
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries listed in Item 14. This schedule is the 
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an 
opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule 
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial 
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the 
information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement(s) on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-74515, 333-50841 and 333-50877) and the
Registration Statement(s) on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-5535) of our report dated
February 12, 1999 (except for Note 11, as to which the date is March 16, 1999)
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Applied
Analytical Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Raleigh, North Carolina
March 30, 1999
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION***Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode, V. Igor Gonda, Chief Executive Officer of Aradigm Corporation (the “Company”), and Thomas C.Chesterman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of theirknowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Annual Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report andresults of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Annual Report.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 30th day of March 2007.     /s/ Igor Gonda /s/ Thomas C. Chesterman       President and Chief Executive Officer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       Dated: March 30, 2007 Dated: March 30, 2007  *This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofAradigm Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language contained in such filing.
## Description of an EPA Significant Guidance Document

EPA maintains a list of Significant Guidance Documents at http://www.epa.gov/regulations/guidance/ as called for by the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) Fi nal Bulletin for Agency Go od Guidance Practices ( http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2007/m07-07.pdf ). Please be aware that the EPA list of Significant Guidance Documents does not include every guidance do cument issued by EPA and only encompasses those documents that are "significant" as defined by OMB’s Bulletin.

This final document has been determined to be an EPA Significant Guidance Document per the OMB Bulletin definition and is included on the EPA list of significant guidance documents. OMB’s Bulletin directs agencies to allow for the public to submit comments on any Significant Guidance Document that appears on the agency’s list of significant guidance documents. EPA allows for public comments to be submitted through the Agency’s electronic docket and commenting system at http://www.regulations.gov

.

Please note that although you may r eceive an acknowledgement that EPA has received your comment, you may not receive a detailed response to your comment. Your fee dback is nevertheless important to the EPA and will be forwarded to the appropriate program staff for consideration.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00307-CR

ROEL ALVAREZ LOPEZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CR-981-12-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 25, 2015