alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
bpsr_ex41.htm

EXHIBIT 4.1 

 


	

	
BARBARA K. CEGAVSKE

Secretary of State

202 North Carson Street

Carson City, Nevada 89701-4201 (775) 684-5708

Website: www.nvsos.gov




 


	
Amendment to
Certificate of Designation

After Issuance of Class or Series

(PURSUANT TO NRS 78.1955)
	
 

	
 
	
 

	
USE BLACK INK ONLY - DO NOT HIGHLIGHT 
	
ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY




 

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Designation
For Nevada Profit Corporations

(Pursuant to NRS 78.1955 - After Issuance of Class or Series)

 

1. Name of corporation:

 

Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.

 

2. Stockholder approval pursuant to statute has been obtained.

 

3. The class or series of stock being amended:

 

Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Stock

 

4. By a resolution adopted by the board of directors, the certificate of designation is being amended as follows or the new class or series is:

 

RESOLVED, that Section 1 (Designation and Amount) of the Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Stock Certificate of Designation be amended to increase the authorized number of shares constituting such series to Four Hundred (400). The $0.001 per share par value and $0.001 per share stated value shall remain unchanged.

 


	
5. Effective date of filing: (optional)
	
	
 
	
(must not be later than 90 days after the certificate is filed)




 

6. Signature: (required)

 


	/s/		
 

		 Al Mitrani	
 

		 Signature of Officer	
 

	 	 	
 

	
 
	
 




 

Filing Fee: $175.00

 

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit with the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.

 


	
This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees. 
	
Nevada Secretary of State NRS Amend Designation - After



Revised: 1-5-15
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Auto-Q International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
David Hope, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18,
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company at the dates and for the periods presented in this
          Report.

Date: February 17, 2004



                                            /s/  DAVID HOPE
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 David Hope
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-05111,
333-33013, 333-42073, 333-81687, 333-90791, 333-37958, 333-55314, 333-81872 and 333-83462), Form S-3 (File
No. 333-08519) and Form S-4 (File No. 333-73382) of WellPoint Health Networks Inc. of our report dated January 31, 2002, except Note 3 as to which the
date is March 15, 2002, and Note 22 as to which the date is March 18, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
April 29, 2002 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


The Board of Directors
The Cerplex Group, Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report incorporated herein by reference and to the
reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Orange County, California
May 30, 1997
Exhibit 10.20


 


AMENDMENT
#1


 


This
Amendment (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of February 10, 2017 by and between Iconic Holdings, LLC (the
“Holder”), and HealthLynked Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) in order to amend
that certain Convertible Promissory Note issued by the Company to the Holder in the original principal amount of $550,000 (the
“Note”) dated July 7, 2016. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition shall have the meanings
given to them in the Note (defined below).


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties
agree as follows:


 


1.           Maturity Date. The Company and the Holder agree to extend the Maturity Date of the Note for a period of 90 days
to July 7, 2017 (the “Amended Maturity Date”).


 


2.           Consideration for this Amendment. In consideration for entering into this Amendment, the Company agrees to issue
to the Holder 500,000 5 year cashless warrants, exercisable at $.15 (the “Maturity Date Consideraion”).


 


3.           Extension of the Maturity Date. The Company may request that the Amended Maturity Date be extended for an additional
90 days, provided that the Company obtain written consent from the Holder and issue to the Holder an additional 500,000 5 year
cashless warrants, exercisable at $.15 (the “Extension Fee”). For the avoidance of doubt, no extension of the
Maturity Date shall be effective unless and until Holder has received the Extension Fee applicable to such extension of the Maturity
Date.


 


4.           Continuing Enforceability; Conflict Between Documents. Except as otherwise modified by this Amendment, the Note
and each of the other Transaction Documents shall remain in full force and effect, enforceable in accordance with all of its original
terms and provisions. This Amendment shall not be effective or binding unless and until it is fully executed and delivered by
Holder and Company. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Amendment, on the one hand, and the Note or any other Transaction
Document, on the other hand, the terms of this Amendment shall prevail.


 


5.           Notices. Unless otherwise specifically provided for herein, all notices, demands or requests required or permitted
under this Amendment to be given to Company or Holder shall be given as set forth in the “Notices” section of the
Notes.


 


[Signature
Page to Follow.]


 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this
Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


COMPANY:


 


HEALTHLYNKED CORP. 


 





	By:	/s/ George O’Leary	 
	Name:	George O’Leary	 
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer	 



 


HOLDER:


 


ICONIC HOLDINGS, LLC


 





	By:	/s/ Robert
Papiri	 
	Name:	Robert
Papiri	 
	Title:	Manager	 


 


 


 [Signature
page to Forebearance Agreement]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          32,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,775
<PP&E>                                         754,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                (45,083)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 883,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,357
<BONDS>                                        407,811   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           352
<OTHER-SE>                                     408,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   883,761
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,385
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,117
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  7,733
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,616)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The Company believes historical earnings per share are not meaningful due to
predecessor entities being organized as S corporations, partnerships and
limited liability companies. Rather, pro forma earnings per share are a more
meaningful measure of the Company's results of operations for the period
presented. Pro forma earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 1996
was $0.93.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      USC. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Interstate Data USA,
      Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Randall R. Carpenter, President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




October
                20, 2008
            
            /S/
                Randall R. CarpenterRandall
                R. Carpenter
              President
                (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Jackie MANIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of OKLAHOMA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7032.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 1, 2002.

Before EBEL, LUCERO and HARTZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Petitioner-Appellant Jackie Manis filed with the *337United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma a petition for “habeas or other relief,” in which he alleged violations of his rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution. In addition, Mr. Manis filed, again pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, a “Petition for Habeas 2241 Relief,” which asserted various due process violations. In particular, Mr. Manis sought “an order directing [Oklahoma] to correct their jury selection process, and records, and produce evidence that state withheld from defense counsel,” and he made vague allegations that his prison sentence was being improperly administered. (R.O.A. Vol.I, Doc. 1.) In this same petition Mr. Manis also suggested that prison officials had denied him access to legal materials *(id.);*in related documents Mr. Manis complained about small prison cells, a lack of air conditioning, and a “reduction of medical, law library, and housing health hazards” at the Mack Alford Correctional Center, where his is imprisoned. *(Id.,*Doc. 5.)

The district court liberally construed Mr. Manis’s pro se filings, *see Haines v. Kerner,*404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S.Ct. 594, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972), though it struggled with the tremendous lack of clarity in Mr. Manis’s pleadings, as well as Mr. Manis’s failure to present documents supporting his arguments. Ultimately, the court concluded that Mr. Manis should have presented his claims through either 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or 42 U.S.C. § 1983, rather than 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and denied Mr. Manis relief. (February 7, 2002 Order at 2-3.) The court also declined to grant a certificate of appealability (COA). *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A); *Montez v. McKinna,*208 F.3d 862, 866-67 (10th Cir.2000).

On appeal, Mr. Manis renews his request for a COA and, in cursory fashion, alleges that “[§ ] 2254 form is in adequate. [Section] 2241 must be used.” (Aplt. Br. at 15.) Having carefully reviewed the record on appeal and Mr. Manis’s pleadings, we agree substantially with the reasoning of the district court. Accordingly, we DENY Mr. Manis’s renewed application for a COA and DISMISS the appeal.

*

 After examining appellant's brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered *337submitted without oral argument. This Order and Judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
Exhibit 10.67			

			Schedule of Project Loans under the						Guaranty Federal Master Loan Agreement which is						attached as Exhibit 10.65to the Company's Form 10-Q for the period ending March			31, 1999, as						amended by the Second Modification attached as Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's			Form 10-Q						for the period ending June 30, 2000			

**
								 								

**Facility Name**
	 								

**Location**
	 								

**Loan Amount**
	 							

**Date of Loan**

						Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of Austintown					
							Austintown, OH					
							$2,555,726.00					

							March 26, 1999							

							Alterra Clare Bridge Cottage of Middletown					
							Middletown, OH					
							$2,314,985.00				

							March 26, 1999							

							Alterra Clare Bridge of Eden Prairie					
							Eden Prairie, MN					
						$5,070,914.00

							January 8,1999							

							Alterra Clare Bridge of North Oaks					
							North Oaks, MN					
							$4,795,657.00				

							January 8, 1999							

							Alterra Clare Bridge of Olympia					
							Olympia, WA					
							$4,938,738.00					

							January 8, 1999							

							Alterra Clare Bridge of Plymouth					
							Plymouth, MN					
							$4,880,809.00					

							January 8, 1999							

							Alterra Clare Bridge of Puyallup					
							Puyallup, WA					
							$4,633,862.00					

							January 8, 1999							

							Alterra Clare Bridge of Spokane					
							Spokane, WA					
							$4,542,758.00					

							January 8, 1999							

							Alterra Sterling House of Merillville					

							Merillville, IN					
							$3,126,422.00						

							February 19, 1999							

							Alterra Sterling House of Portage					
							Portage, IN					
							$2,966,706.00				

							February 19, 1999							

							Alterra Sterling House of Richmond					
							Richmond, IN					
							$3,002,792.00					

							February 19, 1999							

							Alterra Sterling House of Salem					
							Perry, OH					
							$2,084,073.00						

						February 23, 1999							
							Alterra Sterling House of Westerville					
							Columbus, OH					
							$2,729,703.00					

							March 26, 1999					

**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      49,441,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,114,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            13,400,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                535,687,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    965,482,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 10,116,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,642,538,000
<DEPOSITS>                               1,417,394,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                23,486,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         13,569,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 30,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,250,000
<COMMON>                                       200,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 148,639,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           1,642,538,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             79,816,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           33,656,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               898,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           114,370,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          52,258,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          56,558,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       57,812,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                2,875,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           3,838,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             54,051,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             18,602,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,317,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.96
<LOANS-NON>                                  4,718,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 1,946,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               510,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             9,435,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                2,766,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   572,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           10,116,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOHN JOSEPH SPRAIN,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-2974

LT Case No. 2021-CF-000701-A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed June 7, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Citrus County, 

Richard A. Howard, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender,

and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Caldwell, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

COHEN, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
----

            COUNCIL DECISION         

of 28 November 2006         

on the accession of the Community to United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No 107 on uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/874/EC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (Revised 1958 Agreement) (1), and in particular Article 3(3) and the second indent of Article 4(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the assent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

1.   The Community shall apply Regulation No 107 of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction.

2.   The text of the Regulation is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

Regulation No 107 of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on uniform provisions concerning the approval of category M2 or M3 vehicles with regard to their general construction shall become part of the Community type-approval system for motor vehicles.

Article 3

The Commission shall notify the Secretary-General of the United Nations of this Decision.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2006.

For the Council

The President

E. HEINÄLUOMA            

----

(1)OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78.

----
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | APPLETON PAPERS INC. |
|----------------------------------|----------------------|
|                             |                 |   |
| Dated:  August 9, 2010 |                 | /s/ Thomas J. Ferree  |
|                             | Name:                | Thomas J. Ferree |
|                             | Title:               | Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Exhibit 31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
    Form 10-K
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
                David
    A. DeLorenzo
   President and Chief Executive Officer