alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

*CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERCERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, MarcP. Flores, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.             The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated:  September 14, 2007 |   | By:    | /s/ Marc P. Flores                    |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |   | Marc P. Flores                        |
|                            |   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 1461 Unemployed Number in thousands 45 to 49 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03024936Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Level - 45-49 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:09:18 PM)
/ 7 eVeS,k - 2...3-71711(.:Ara,/ 

Address of Facility 

'"--7 /)6 41-7- 55-70/ 

City State Zip 

Cler

S

p

Co

State of Montana 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. 

[The Clerk of Court will assign a number] 

ck.-41-614 ifj -r_ 

NAME PETITIONER, 

V. 

NAME OF WARDEN/FAALI MINISTRATOR, 

RESPONDENT. 

Petition for Writ of 

Habeas Corpus 

,,r(t)c- 0-)//.5 

1, 

, arn representing myself, and I 

[Name of Inmate] 

believe that I am entitled to a Writ of Habeas Corpus under § 46-22-101, MCA, for one 

or more of the following reasons: 

[Check the applicable box]: 

The Department of Corrections has incorrectly calculated my sentence which 

illegally extends my parole eligibility or discharge date. 

The Parole Board should have granted rne a parole AND the Board violated my 

Due Process rights in denying me a parole. 

I am entitled to more credit for jail time served than I received. 

PRO SE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS 8; Form 5(1) 

Montana Supreme Court (Rev. April 2021) 
The length of rny sentence is longer than the law allows. 

I am entitled to good time that is not credited against my sentence. 

I am being held in jail and I believe my bail is excessive. 

Other reason incarceration is illegal. 

Describe in detail why you are entitled to habeas corpus relief. Be specific. If possible, 

provide citations to legal authority. Attach any documents that help you explain why the 

Court should grant your petition. A copy of any judgments, orders or other documents 

that support your argument must be provided. 

p. 2 of 5 

PRO SE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS & Form 5(1) 

Montana Supreme Court (Rev. April 2021) 
Other relief., Explain: 

(s-i/770 

-15 c 7

*1 >Z-44ey,44 -/o7 - 7--al icej (47/ 

STATE OF MONTANA 

VERIFICATION 

) 

: ss. 

County of Siked, 4ow 

I believe I am being incarcerated illegally. I certify that the contents of this 

petition are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 

DATED this /0 day of fi-pc; 1 

- //Ida ry 

ERIN STAJCAR 

\ NOTARY PUBLIC for the 

'5; ' State of Montana Residing at Butte, MT 

My Commission Expires May 02, 2024. 

, .20Z 2- . 

Inmate Signature 

f PC_) 

Printed Name 

p. 4 of 5 

PRO SE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS Form 5(1) 

Montana Supreme Court (Rev. April 2021) 
prepaid: 

D. State of Montana 

Office of the Attorney General 

P. O. Box 201401 

Helena, MT 59620-1401 

(see INSTRUCTIONS #9) 

El County Attorney (see INSTRUCTIONS #9) 

[Write name of County] 

[Signature] 

[Print name] 

PRO SE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS & Form 5(1) 

Montana Supreme Court (Rev. April 2021) 

p.5 of 5
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10.28

                        Amendment to Employment Agreement

This Amendment is entered into as of October 1, 2002 by and between ICT Group,
Inc, a Pennsylvania corporation (hereinafter called "Company") and Vincent M.
Dadamo an individual (hereinafter called "Employee").

Whereas, Company and Employee have entered into that certain employment
agreement dated May 25, 1999, as amended on January 2, 2002 (hereinafter the
"Employment Agreement"); and

Whereas, in consideration of the continued employment of Employee, and deeming
it to be in Company's best interest, Company and Employee now wish to amend a
certain provision of the Employment Agreement.

Now, therefore in consideration of the covenants and promise contained herein,
and intending to be legally bound hereby, Company and Employee hereby agree as
follows:

     1.   Section 6 (a), Post-Termination Payments: Section 6 (a) of the
          Employment Agreement, as amended previously, is hereby amended by
          deleting Section 6 (a) in its entirety and replacing it with a new
          Section 6 (a) to read as follows: "(a) If Employee is terminated by
          Company pursuant to Paragraph 10 hereof, Company shall pay to Employee
          a monthly severance payment in an amount equal to Employee's monthly
          salary at the time of termination for either (i) twelve (12) months if
          Employee has less than ten (10) years of uninterrupted service with
          Company as of the effective date of employment termination or (ii)
          eighteen (18) months if Employee has ten (10) years or more of
          uninterrupted service with Company as of the effective date of
          employment termination, provided that Employee executes at the time of
          Employee's termination of employment a General Release satisfactory to
          Company of any and all claims which Employee may have arising out of
          or relating to Employee's employment with and/or termination of
          employment with Company."
     2.   Section 13, Restrictive Covenants, Trade Secrets, Etc. Section 13 of
          the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by inserting, immediately
          after the phrase "For a period of one (1) year" in the first sentence
          thereof, the following language: "(or for a period of 18 months if the
          Employee is entitled to 18 months of severance payments pursuant to
          Section 6 (a) of this Agreement)".
     3.   Effective Date: The change to the Employment Agreement set forth in
          this Amendment shall become effective on October 1, 2002.
     4.   No Other Changes: Except as set forth herein, the Employment Agreement
          shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

<PAGE>

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date and year first above written.

ICT Group, Inc.                             EMPLOYEE

By: ___________________________             Signature:_________________
Name:__________________________             Name:______________________
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Order entered September 9, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00571-CV

DAVID ARTHUR, Appellant

V.

ANGELA LAFRANCES EVANS AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-00162-2014

ORDER

This appeal from an order denying appellant possession of certain real property was 

abated May 27, 2014 because appellee Angela Evans had filed for bankruptcy. By motion filed 

September 8, 2014, appellant seeks to reinstate the appeal, asserting the bankruptcy court has

signed an order stating the automatic stay does not apply to any eviction proceedings. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 8.3. Attached to appellant’s motion is a copy of the bankruptcy court’s order.

We GRANT appellant’s motion and REINSTATE the appeal. See id. We note 

appellant has also filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of the appeal. That motion will be 

determined in due course. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.1

Certification
of

American
River Bankshares

pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

regarding
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of American River Bankshares, a California corporation (the “Company”), does
hereby certify that:

| | 1. | The
                                         Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 (the
                                         “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                                         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | Information
                                         contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                                         and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:
    November 7, 2018     | By: | /s/ DAVID E. RITCHIE, JR.            
|------------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|                                |     | David E. Ritchie, Jr.                
|                                |     | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                |     |                                      
|Dated: November
    7,     2018 | By: | /s/ MITCHELL A. DERENZO              
|                                |     | Mitchell A. Derenzo                  
|                                |     | Executive Vice President and         
|                                |     | Chief Financial Officer              



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American River Bankshares and will be retained
by American River Bankshares and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

8
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
I, William D. Green, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general partner ofAccenture SCA (the “Registrant”), certify that:
1.  I have reviewed the Registrant’s Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the period presented in this quarterly report; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for theRegistrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this quarterly report any change inthe Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
Dated: January 7, 2005         /s/ William D. GreenWilliam D. Green
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as principal financial officer of SMTC Corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

1) the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2) the information contained in the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended July 1, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: August 15, 2007 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMTC Corporation and will be retained by SMTC Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Boyd Hendrickson, certify that:(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc.;(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;(4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and(5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 9, 2007       /s/ Boyd Hendrickson Boyd Hendrickson    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive    Officer and Director    (*Principal Executive Officer*)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 393 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 393

To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from transferring any national 
forest system lands in the Angeles National Forest in California out of 
          Federal ownership for use as a solid waste landfill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, January 30), 1995

  Mrs. Boxer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from transferring any national 
forest system lands in the Angeles National Forest in California out of 
          Federal ownership for use as a solid waste landfill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN TRANSFERS OF NATIONAL FOREST LANDS.

    (a) Prohibition.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall not transfer 
(by exchange or otherwise) any land owned by the United States and 
managed by the Secretary as part of the Angeles National Forest to any 
person unless the instrument of conveyance contains a restriction, 
enforceable by the Secretary, on the future use of the land prohibiting 
the use of any portion of the land as a solid waste landfill.
    (b) Enforcement.--The Secretary shall act to enforce a restriction 
described in subsection (a) as soon as possible when and if a violation 
of the restriction occurs.
                                 <all>
```
#### FISHER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. Robert E. RIGGS, Appellee.

No. 13334.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Houston.

Aug. 27, 1959.

*916Dyess, Dyess & Prewett and Arthur D. Dyess, Jr., Houston, for appellant B. B. Bettell & Son, Inc.

McGregor, Sewell & Junell and William L. Bowers, Jr., Houston, for appellant Fisher Const. Co.

Stanley F. Swenson and Carey Williams, Houston, for appellee.

WERLEIN, Justice.

Robert E: Riggs brought this suit against Fisher Construction Company and B. B. Bettell and Son, Inc., to recover for personal injuries sustained by him on August 15, 1955, when he hopped or jumped through a plate-glass window in an unfinished store space, a part of Palm Shopping Center in the City of Houston, then in the process of construction. Reference is made to our former opinion which is published in 320 S.W.2d at page 200, 208 wherein the facts of the case are set out at considerable length.

Appellants’ 3rd to 7th Points, inclusive, were briefed together, and asserted that the Trial Court erred in overruling their motion for an instructed verdict, among other grounds, because the findings and answers of the jury to Special Issues Nos. 1, 3 and 11 were not supported by any evidence and the findings and answers to Special Issues Nos. 2, 4, 5, 7 and 9 were contrary to the overwhelming weight and preponderance of the evidence. In discussing such Points together, as they were so briefed, this Court stated:

> “We cannot agree with appellant that appellee was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law and that the findings of the jury are not supported by any evidence or that they are against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. The fundamental principle of appellate review is that the record must be viewed in the light most favorably in support of the judgment of the trial court and the jury verdict. * * * This Court, in considering the sufficiency of the evidence, must disregard all evidence adverse to the findings of the jury and consider only the evidence favorable to such findings, indulging every legitimate conclusion which tends to uphold the same.”

On application for writ of error, the Supreme Court in its opinion published in 325 S.W.2d 126, reversed and remanded the cause for further consideration by this Court on the ground that the rule herein-above announced by this Court in its opinion is applicable only when the question is one of no evidence, and is not applicable in determining whether the answers of the jury are contrary to the overwhelming weight and preponderance of the evidence.

*917This Court had actually considered all of the evidence, including that which is contrary to the verdict, thereby applying the correct rule, but erroneously stated a rule applicable only when there is no evidence.

We have carefully reviewed all the evidence, both favorable to the verdict and that militating against it, and have concluded that the jury’s findings are not contrary to the overwhelming weight and preponderance of the evidence. In re King’s Estate, 150 Tex. 662, 244 S.W.2d 660; Tudor v. Tudor, Tex.Sup., 314 S.W.2d 793.

Judgment affirmed on remand.
Section
409A
  Plan Company
 If you wish to change your existing distribution elections, please return these forms by December 19, 2008 . Please note that elections may not be changed to postpone the
distribution of amounts payable in 2008, or accelerate the distribution in 2008 of amounts that are
otherwise payable after 2008.
 
 Sincerely,
          [NAME]