Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997 

### What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent ^s" Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes. ^ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?

Yes No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 

### 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.



### I

HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997 

### 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellentf GoodSatisfactory

_ Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? -c oov 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes 3 _ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ? 

### /Yes _ No, Not nearly enough _ No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? 

# aT-d b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? - tv 0 d) Other ? 6.e4l / tL' 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions. j^ ca arm/ re.^ w2 t a^ol^ 

## fila 

# ,-Do 1A Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997 

### 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent Good Satisfactory

_ Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes i No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?



### Yes No, Not nearly enough - No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997


### 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent ,V \^ Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. _ What segment of the hearing was most useful ? COL i P c v `^^^C`t ^ 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes . _ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?



### es _ No, Not nearly enough _ No, Not at all What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent </ Good Satisfactory , Unsatisfactory _ gment of the hearing was most useful ? 2. What se CA

# I 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes No, Not nearly enough _ No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?

f Yes - No, Not nearly enough _ No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions. 

# '^ ^' Q ^aa- V-,) Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent /

V/ Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory _ 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ?



# L,Lg 

# v\

# 'k I^3V 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? Yes 

# J

_ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?



### Yes No, Not nearly enough _ No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997 

### r overall evaluation of this hearing ? 1. What is you Excellent J Good Satisfactory , Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? Yes \/ 

### No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?

Yes _ No, Not nearly enough

_ No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? 

### v c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? 

### d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997


### 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 1I 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? Yes No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?



### Yes No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material- ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997
1. What is your overall evaluatio1ofthis hearing ? Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes 3` _ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ? 

### /Yes - No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other? 

# M Z5 <7r (7 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions. Tae f/^/'zs



### Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent Good J, , 

### Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? L ^ 

# 4 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes No, Not nearly enough 

# k

No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?

Yes 

### No, Not nearly enough ` No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? 

### d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997
1. , What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent Good 3 / Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? Yes 3 No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 

### 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?

Yes _ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 

### 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? -yr=rd 

### d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions. 

# a .
Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997 

### 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent 

### Good Satisfactory l\ Unsatisfactory _ 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? A"02--- 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?

Yes No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 

### What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b Th a ) e genda and time spent on each topic ? , 5 y c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? 

### d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? CiC' (A L

e S dv^JGrds 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes No, Not nearly enough _ No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?



### Yes - No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions. .401hnj (' Wt ! p'a u•..5 ^1'VY - C.^Qa1^^^V^f^ l W2 ^K^z }^ 13-f 4L p` t3 fL (FDA C-, Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation April 1, 1997


### 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 

# 4' // 

# `Ifs f / qj /^ ,- G 1 Z s ,^ 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all

_ 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ? --C Yes No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all

_ 

### 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? 1c/ b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? 

# /Lc h c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? AA/c: C 

### d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997 What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent 

### Goo Satisfactory _ Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?

Yes _ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 

### 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? 

### d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997 What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent Good V Satisfactory Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ? 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes V _ No, Not nearly enough _ No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ? VYes - No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.



### Name/Organization (Optional)
HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing ? Excellent Good 3 Satisfactory _ Unsatisfactory 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ?

C 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes _ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ? 

### /Yes - No, Not nearly enough

_ No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? d) Other ? 6. Additional comments and/or suggestions.

\112 ^71^ ^J11^ l1^/l C^t^^l Name/Organization (Optional) HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)Public Hearing on Plumbing Products Hearing Evaluation 

### April 1, 1997 1. What is your overall evaluation of this hearing? Excellent _ Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory _ 2. What segment of the hearing was most useful ?



# IS, . 3. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this hearing ? 

### Yes _ No, Not nearly enough _ No, Not at all 4. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted ?

Yes 

### _ No, Not nearly enough - No, Not at all 5. What could the Department do better or different regarding: a) The structure of the hearing ? b) The agenda and time spent on each topic ? ?,c-'&r' c) The distribution of information and public hearing material ? 

### d) Other ? Additional comments and/or suggestions. odd

HEARING 3/28/97 (3:37 pm)