alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or 

positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data 

that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to 

facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of 

technical developments.

Assessment and Standards Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

National Renewable Energy Laboratory

U.S. Department of Energy

Coordinating Research Council

EPAct/V2/E-89: Assessing the Effect 

of Five Gasoline Properties on Exhaust 

Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles 

Certified to Tier 2 Standards

Final Report on Program Design and 

Data Collection

Appendix H

Fuel Blending Experiment

to Characterize Carryover Effects

EPA-420-R-13-004

April 2013
H-2 

Investigation of Fuel Carryover Effects on Distillation Parameters

July 27, 2009

Fuel 1 Fuel 2 Fuel 1 Fuel 27 Fuel 1 Fuel 6 Fuel 2 Fuel 21 Fuel 27 Fuel 21

Ethanol Content vol. % 10 0 10 15 10 10 0 20 15 20

T50 oF 150 240 150 220 150 190 240 160 220 160

T90 oF 300 340 300 340 300 340 340 300 340 300

DVPE psi 10.0 10.0 10.0 6.65 10.0 6.65 10.0 6.65 6.65 6.65

Aromatics vol. % 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 40 15 40

EtOH

Target Meas. Target Meas. Target Meas.

Fuel 1 Fuel 2

10 100 0 10 9.93 150 149.8 300 297.2

0 0 100 10 10.22 240 237.9 340 339

5 95 10.64 236 338.8

95 5 10.05 150.6 301.7

Fuel 1 Fuel 27

10 100 0 10 9.93 150 149.8 300 297.2

15 0 100 6.65 6.87 220 221.7 340 339.3

5 95 7.01 216.1 339.2

95 5 9.81 150.9 301.9

Fuel 1 Fuel 6

10 100 0 10 9.93 150 149.8 300 297.2

10 0 100 6.65 7.21 190 189.4 340 340.3

5 95 7.23 186 339.2

95 5 9.72 150.4 301.7

Fuel 2 Fuel 21

0 100 0 10 10.22 240 237.9 340 339

20 0 100 6.65 6.98 160 168.8 300 304.8

5 95 7.27 169.2 305.9

95 5 10.75 235.8 336.4

Fuel 27 Fuel 21

15 100 0 6.65 6.87 220 221.7 340 339.3

20 0 100 6.65 6.98 160 168.8 300 304.8

5 95 6.95 168.6 305.2

95 5 6.83 217.8 338.9

►Follow EPAct Fuel Sampling Procedure

►Blend fuels A3, A4, B3, B4, C3, C4, D3, D4, E3 and E4

►Perform D86 test on the fuels of each set in the course of a single day

 ▬ Use exclusively OptiDist equipment

 ▬ Use the same distillation still for all tests

 Fuel 27: 1/2 gal

Fuel Pair C Fuel Pair D Fuel Pair E

21

2

Components

Fuel Set C

Test Fuel

Fuel Set D

27

Scope of Work:

PROPERTY UNIT

Test Fuel Sets

Fuel Pair A Fuel Pair B

 Fuel 2: 1/2 gal

 Fuel 6: 1 qt

 Fuel 21: 1/2 gal

E4

E3

21

Test Fuel

B4

B3

27

1

D3

 are being tested on that day

Components

Fuel Set E

Components Test Fuel

►Obtain samples of fuels 1,2,6,21 and 27

 Sample sizes (~2X needed volume):

Test Fuel

 Fuel 1: 1 gal

D4

2

► Note: The same fuel need not be tested twice on a given day, if it belongs to two different fuel sets which

6

1

C4

C3

Fuel Set B

A3

A4

Components

RVP T50 T90

Fuel Set A

Test Fuel

1

Components
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00209-CV

THE DAVIS LAW FIRM

v.

JAMES BATES AND CONSUMERS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 2 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2011-CCL-00202

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 13, 2014
#### LOUISVILLE & JEFFERSON COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, Appellant, v. C. E. COIN et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 2, 1964.

Homer Parrent, Jr., James L. Taylor, Louisville, for appellant.

Raymond F. Bossmeyer, Heidenberg & Bossmeyer, Sidney Baer, Louisville, for appellees.

WILLIAMS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Jefferson Circuit Court directing the Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning Commission to change the zoning classification of appellees’ property from “A” One-Family to “D-l” Commercial. The hearing in circuit court was de novo, as provided in KRS 100.057(2). Within a short time after the hearing took place our opinion in American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning Commission, Ky., 379 S.W.2d 450, was handed down. Therein we held that KRS 100.057(2), insofar as it provides that hearings in circuit court shall be de novo, violates section 27 of the Kentucky Constitution. It follows, we said, that issues on an appeal taken under that section of the statute shall be confined to questions of law which are encompassed in the question, “Was the administrative decision arbitrary ? ”

Accordingly, this case must be and it is reversed, and remanded to the circuit court for review consistent with the applicable rules set out in American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning Commission, Ky., 379 S.W.2d 450.
#### V. N. CROW, Appellant, v. Harmon DOBSON, Appellee.

No. 13256.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 11, 1957.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 8, 1958.

Kelley, Looney, McLean' &' Littleton,' Edinburg, for appellant.

George W. Storter, Brownsville, for ap-pellee.

POPE, Justice.

Plarmon Dobson, appellee, sued V. N. Crow, appellant, for damages for an alleged conversion of a Chris-craft boat at Port Isabel in Cameron County. Crow filed a plea of privilege to be sued in Hidalgo County, his residence, and the court overruled the plea. Crow appealed on one point. He asserts that the trial court merely required Dobson, the appellee, to prove that a substantial controversy existed, but that Dobson was under the burden to prove a conversion by the preponderance of the evidence. Dobson relied upon Section 9, Art. 1995, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., to prove a trespass in Cameron County.

Appellant, Crow, is correct in his contention that the plaintiff in this kind of *616venue hearing must prove, by the preponderance of the evidence, that the conversion occurred. Compton v. Elliott, 126 Tex. 232, 88 S.W.2d 91; Victoria Bank & Trust Co. v. Monteith, 138 Tex. 216, 158 S.W.2d 63; Castro Cooperative Gin Co. v. Harrison, Tex.Civ.App., 272 S.W.2d 538; 1 McDonald, Texas Civil Practice, Sec. 4.17.

Appellant, however, is in error in concluding that the trial judge failed to apply that rule to the evidence. At the conclusion of the evidence, the judge stated: ■“It rather appears to the Court that a controversy does exist, and the boat was picked up in his county at the direction of the defendant.” Appellant promptly challenged the court’s conclusion, and the court then called for briefs within one week. The court entered its order overruling the plea twenty-seven days later. From this casual remark by the court, we do not conclude that almost four weeks later, after he had considered the briefs, that he applied the wrong rule. Appellant, by carefully analyzing the evidence, also reasons that the evidence fails to show anything more than a controversy and wholly fails to show that there was a conversion by a preponderance of the evidence. Both Dobson and Crow had become involved financially with a Mr. Ward. As a result of rather involved transactions, Ward gave Dobson a bill ol sale to the boat, and in a separate transaction he pledged the boat to Crow. Crow picked up the boat and transported it from Port Isabel in Cameron County to a lake in Hidalgo County. Without detailing all of the evidence, some of it very favorable to the appellant, Crow, there was evidence upon which the court could find that there was a conversion. Dobson had a bill of sale, the boat was registered with the United States Coast Guard after notice of the transfer to Dobson, the registration number was on the boat but was painted off by Crow, and Dobson’s name appeared on the boat papers kept in the cabin of the boat. Crow stated that he had seen those papers before he removed the boat. There was evidence which supports the order overruling the plea of privilege.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 3.86
   
   Registered Office.
 Other Offices.
   Time and Place of Meetings.
 Annual Meetings.
 Special Meetings.
 Notice.




---



##### 



Quorum.
 Voting.
 Method of Voting.
 Action Without Meeting.
 2




---



##### 



Responsibilities.
 Number; Term.
 Vacancies; Increases.
 Place of meetings.
 3




---



##### 



Regular Meetings.
 Special Meetings.
 Quorum; Majority Vote.
 Minutes.
 Committees.
 Committee Minutes.
 Action Without Meeting.
 4




---



##### 



Method.
 Waiver.
   Number.
 5




---



##### 



Appointed Officers.
 Removal.
 Compensation.
 Duties.
       6




---



##### 



Checks.
 Fiscal Year.
 Telephone and Similar Meetings.
 Distributions and Share Dividends.
 Amendment of Bylaws.
 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           168,381
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      39,159
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   13,168
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 225,057
<CASH>                                          56,007
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 491,770
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                188,914
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                146,659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,855
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   491,770
<PREMIUMS>                                     346,543
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              9,324
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,600
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 106,251
<BENEFITS>                                      25,048
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           408,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,408
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,408
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2


                         LSB CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Sharland,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2004 and
     results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31,
     2004.


                                        /s/ John E. Sharland
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John E. Sharland
                                        Senior Vice President
                                        Chief Financial Officer

                                        May 14, 2004



                                       24
Exhibit 10.12
 Lender Processing Services, Inc.  2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 Notice of Stock Option Grant
  Name of Optionee:Total Number of Shares
Subject to Option:Type of Option:
    
    
    NonqualifiedExercise Price Per Share:
    
    
    $Effective Date of Grant:Vesting Schedule:
    
    
    Subject to the terms of the Plan and the Stock
Option Agreement attached hereto, the right to
exercise this option shall vest with respect to
___of the option on each anniversary of the
Effective Date of Grant.Expiration Date:
    
    
    8th Anniversary of Effective Date of Grant
The option is subject to earlier expiration, as
provided in Section 3(b) of the attached Stock
Option Agreement.
  Optionee:
    
    
    
    Lender Processing Services, Inc.By:
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Print Name:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Francis K. ChanDate:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Executive Vice PresidentAddress:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



Lender Processing Services, Inc.  2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 Stock Option Agreement
 SECTION 1. GRANT OF OPTION.
 (a) Option.
 (b) Plan and Defined Terms.
 SECTION 2. RIGHT TO EXERCISE
  SECTION 3. TERM AND EXPIRATION.
 (a) Basic Term.
 (b) Termination of Employment or Service.
  -1-




---



##### 



(c) Definition of Cause.
 (d) Definition of Disability.
 SECTION 4. TRANSFERABILITY OF OPTION.
  SECTION 5. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
 (a) Acknowledgements.
 -2-




---



##### 



(b) Tax Withholding.
 (c) Notice Concerning Disqualifying Dispositions.
 (d) Rights as a Stockholder.
 (e) Ratification of Actions.
 (f) Notice.
 (g) Choice of Law.
 -3-




---



##### 



(h) Modification or Amendment.
 (i) Severability.
 (j) References to Plan.
 (k) Section 409A Compliance.
 -4-
Exhibit 3.59
 PAGE 1
 
 I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
FIDELITY NATIONAL LOAN PORTFOLIO SOLUTIONS, LLC, CHANGING ITS NAME FROM
FIDELITY NATIONAL LOAN PORTFOLIO SOLUTIONS, LLC TO LPS PORTFOLIO
SOLUTIONS, LLC, FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST, A.D.
2008, AT 1:06 OCLOCK P. M.
  4335374 8100
 080865660
You may verify this certificate onlineat corp, delaware. gov/authver. shtml
 
 -s- Harriet Smith WindsorHarriet Smith Windsor, Secretary
of StateAUTHENTICATION: 6787360DATE: 08-12-08




---



##### 



State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision or CorporationsDelivered 01:59 PM 08/12/2008FILED 01:06 PM 08/12/2008SRV 080865660  4335374 FILE
 STATE OF DELAWARE
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
 1.
    
    Name of Limited Liability Company: Fidelity National Loan Portfolio Solutions, LLC
 2.
    
    The Certificate of Formation of the limited liability company is hereby amended as follows:
 Article First is hereby amended to read as follows: The name of the limited liability
company is LPS Portfolio Solutions, LLC
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignedhave executed this Certificate on
the 11th day of August, A.D. 2008.
 By:
    
    /s/ Todd C. JohnsonAuthorized Person(s)Name:
    
    Todd C. JohnsonPrint or TypeAuthorized Person




---



##### 



State of DelawareSecretary of StateDivision of CorporationsDelivered 03:05 PM 04/16/2007FILED 03:05 PM 04/15/2007SRV 070438404 - 4335374 FILE
    
    
    First:The name of the limited liability company is: Fidelity National Loan Portfolio
Solutions, LLC.
    
    Second:The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is Corporation
Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.
The name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ Todd C. JohnsonAuthorized PersonName:
    
    Todd C. Johnson
#### Antonio Garcia LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 02-1564.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 22, 2003.

Decided Jan. 27, 2003.

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Guatemalan citizen Antonio Garcia Lopez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an Immigration Judge’s denial of Garcia Lopez’s application for asylum and withholding of removal. For reversal, Garcia Lopez argues that the Immigration Judge erred in questioning the validity of his testimony, that the Immigration and Naturalization Service failed to show conditions in Guatemala have changed, and that he demonstrated both past persecution and a well-founded fear of future persecution. Upon careful review, we deny the petition.

We agree with the BIA that Garcia Lopez did not show past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution, as there was no evidence that guerrilla forces attempted to recruit him on account of his political opinion, affiliation, or any other characteristic that provides a basis for asylum. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A); *INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 482-83, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). We also conclude that, although respondent was not required to show improved country conditions because Garcia Lopez did not establish past persecution, *see Kratch-marov v. Heston,*172 F.3d 551, 553 (8th Cir.1999), it did so by introducing evidence that since Garcia’s arrival in the United States, Guatemala’s civil war has ended, and the guerrillas have renounced violence and are participating in the political process, *see Francois v. INS,*283 F.3d 926, 931 (8th Cir.2002).

Accordingly, we deny the petition.

A true copy.
EX-32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned
Principal Financial Officer of McKenzie Bay International, Ltd.  (the
"Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly
Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company  for  the  quarter ended  March 31, 2004
(the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act  of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the
Report  fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ Gregory N. Bakeman
----------------------
Gregory N. Bakeman
Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 293 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 293

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the payment to 
 States of per diem for veterans receiving adult day health care, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 1995

Mr. Conrad (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Pell, Mr. Akaka, 
Mr. Jeffords, and Mr. Graham) introduced the following bill; which was 
     read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the payment to 
 States of per diem for veterans receiving adult day health care, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAYMENT TO STATES OF PER DIEM FOR VETERANS RECEIVING ADULT 
              DAY HEALTH CARE.

    (a) Payment of Per Diem for Veterans Receiving Adult Day Care.--
Section 1741 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (1) and (2) as 
        subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph (2):
    ``(2) The Secretary may pay each State per diem at a rate 
determined by the Secretary for each veteran receiving adult day health 
care in a State home, if such veteran is eligible for such care under 
laws administered by the Secretary.''.
    (b) Assistance to States for Construction of Adult Day Care 
Facilities.--(1) Section 8131(3) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting ``adult day health,'' before ``or hospital care''.
    (2) Section 8132 of such title is amended by inserting ``adult day 
health,'' before ``or hospital care''.
    (3) Section 8135(b) of such title is amended--
            (A) in paragraph (2)(C), by inserting ``or adult day health 
        care facilities'' after ``domiciliary beds''; and
            (B) in paragraph (3)(A), by inserting ``or construction 
        (other than new construction) of adult day health care 
        buildings'' before the semicolon.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered October 18, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00227-CV

BO KYOUNG KIM AND SANG J. PARK, Appellants

V.

SOK SAN PAK AND SOO-KYUNG PAK, Appellees

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-00730-2008

ORDER

The Court has been informed that the bankruptcy stay that caused the Court to abate this 

case has concluded. We REINSTATE this case and ORDER appellants to file their brief within 

thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 3.91
 State of
Delaware         Secretary of State   Division of
CorporationsDelivered 10:30 AM 11/09/2007 FILED 10:30 AM
11/09/2007SRV 071207797 - 4456513 FILE
 STATE
of DELAWARE
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY  CERTIFICATE of FORMATION
 
    
    First:The name of the limited liability company is SoftPro, LLC
    
    Second:The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is 1209
Orange Street in the City of Wilmington. The
name of its Registered agent at such address is Corporation Trust Company.
    
    Third:(Use this paragraph only if the company is to have a specific effective date of
dissolution: The latest date on which the limited liability company is to dissolve is
.)
    
    Fourth:(Insert any other matters the members determine to include herein.)
  
 In Witness Whereof,
 By:
    
    /s/ Todd C. Johnson
Authorized
Person(s)Name:
    
    /s/ Todd C. Johnson

Typed or Printed