alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### LOUISVILLE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, a Kentucky Corporation, Appellant, v. John M. BROWN et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 11, 1965.

*714Donan & Vick, Greenville, for appellant.

T. O. Jones, Greenville, for appellees.

CULLEN, Commissioner.

In this action by Louisville Gas & Electric Company to quiet title to the coal under a certain tract of land the court entered judgment at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence dismissing the claim. L. G. & E. has appealed.

The claim of L. G. & E. rested entirely on constructive adverse possession of the coal by virtue of alleged adverse possession of the surface by the person who sold the coal rights to L. G. & E., and by his successor in title.

We doubt that even under the ordinarily applicable rules of adverse possession the claim of L. G. & E. could prevail because:

> 1. Admittedly, prior to 1923, there was no actual adverse possession of the surface. The mere continuance in existence, after the conveyance of the. legal title in 1883, of a fence that previously had enclosed the conveyed tract with other land of the grantor, could not be considered to be an act of adverse possession.

> 2. Such acts of actual adverse possession as were done after 1923 were spasmodic and intermittent, and not continuous. Furthermore, the person who performed those acts did not claim anything but the surface, and it is doubtful whether his possession could inure to the benefit of a person to whom his grantor (who had no valid title) previously had purported to sell the coal rights.

> 3. The adverse claimants could not claim title by constructive adverse possession, since the situation here was an overlap or interference situation in which actual entry upon and possession of the overlap or interference are required. Stepp v. Stepp, 216 Ky. 243, 287 S.W. 707.

Even if it should be considered that L. G. & E.’s claim might prevail under the ordinary rules of adverse possession, L. G. & E. is faced here with a special rule which unquestionably bars its claim. The alleged adverse claimants by whose acts L. G. & E. claims title was wrested from the record owners consisted of the grantor who originally deeded the title to the record owners, and the heirs of that grantor. Under the special rule applicable as between grantor and grantee the grantor and his heirs could not obtain title by adverse possession as against the grantee and his successors in title without giving notice by way of an express disclaimer and making a notorious assertion of title. See Williams v. Thomas, 285 Ky. 776, 149 S.W.2d 525; Hoagland v. Fish, Ky., 238 S.W.2d 133, 135. The acts of the claimants in this case did not make any semblance of meeting the requirements of the rule.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.11
 Lender Processing services, Inc.  2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 Notice of Restricted Stock Grant
  Name of Grantee:Number of Shares of Restricted Stock
Granted:Effective Date of Grant:Period of Restriction:
    
    
    Subject to the terms of the Plan
and the Restricted Stock Award
Agreement attached hereto, the
Period of Restriction shall lapse,
and the Shares shall vest and
become free of the forfeiture and
transfer restrictions contained in
the Restricted Stock Award
Agreement, with respect to ___
of the shares on each anniversary
of the Effective Date of Grant.
  Stock Recipient:
    
    
    
    Lender Processing Services, Inc.By:
    
    
    
    
    
    By:Print Name:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Francis K. ChanDate:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Executive Vice PresidentAddress:
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



Lender Processing Services, Inc.
 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan
 Restricted Stock Award Agreement
 SECTION 1. GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK
 (a) Restricted Stock.
 (b) Plan and Defined Terms.
 SECTION 2. FORFEITURE AND TRANSFER RESTRICTIONS
 (a) Forfeiture Restrictions.
   -2-




---



##### 



(b) Transfer Restrictions.
 (c) Lapse of Restrictions.
 SECTION 3. STOCK CERTIFICATES
   SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
 (a) Tax Withholding.
 -3-




---



##### 



(b) Ratification of Actions.
 (c) Notice.
 (d) Choice of Law.
 (e) Modification or Amendment.
 (f) Severability.
 (g) References to Plan.
 (h) Section 409A Compliance.
 -4-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2


                 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS SOUTHEAST HOLDINGS, L.P.
                 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES CALCULATION
                       (In thousands except ratio amounts)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                         1997        1996       1995         1994
                                         ----        ----       ----         ----
<S>                                   <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings
  Loss before taxes                   $(59,357)   $(40,420)   $(27,515)   $ (9,609)
   Fixed Charges                        61,794      41,227      18,854       4,688
                                      --------    --------    --------    --------
        Earnings                         2,437         807      (8,661)     (4,921)

 Fixed Charges
   Interest Expense                     59,410      39,850      18,065       4,440
   Interest Element of Rentals             296         206         132          33
  Amortization of debt costs             2,088       1,171         657         215
                                      --------    --------    --------    --------
        Total Fixed Charges           $ 61,794    $ 41,227    $ 18,854    $  4,688
                                      ========    ========    ========    ========

 Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges          -           -           -           -
</TABLE>

(1)  Earnings for the year ended December 31, 1997, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were
     insufficient to cover the fixed charges by $59,357, $40,420, $27,515 and
     $9,609, respectively. As a result of such deficiencies, the ratios are not
     presented above.
STATE OF IDAHO 


REVISED 


AUTHORIZATION 


APPLICATION 


FOR 


FEDERAL HAZARDOUS 


WASTE REGULATIONS 


PROMULGATED 


JULY 1,2007 


TO 


JULY 1, 2010 


SUBMITTED BY 


DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 


OCTOBER, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 21 (Wednesday, January 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 6131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01929]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-589 and 731-TA-1394-1396 (Review)]


Forged Steel Fittings From China, Italy, and Taiwan

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the countervailing duty order on forged 
steel fittings from China and the antidumping duty orders on forged 
steel fittings from China, Italy, and Taiwan would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Jason E. Kearns not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on August 1, 2023 (88 FR 
50172) and determined on November 6, 2023 that it would conduct 
expedited reviews (88 FR 84361, December 5, 2023).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on January 26, 2024. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5486 (January 2024), 
entitled Forged Steel Fittings from China, Italy, and Taiwan: 
Investigation Nos. 701-TA-589 and 731-TA-1394-1396 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: January 26, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-01929 Filed 1-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**Exhibit 32**     The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 of Skilled Healthcare Group, Inc., a Delawarecorporation (the “Company”) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No.33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in anyfiling of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or afterthe date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officer of the Company, hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: May 7, 2008 /s/ Boyd Hendrickson   Boyd Hendrickson   Chairman of the Board, Chief
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 (GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANY LOGO)
    
    Media Release
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    
    Contact:
    
    Janice McDill, 312.698.6707janice.mcdill@grubb-ellis.com
 Grubb & Ellis Company Announces Management Change  Dylan Taylor Named Acting President of Global Client Services




---



##### 



2  2  2
1/2/2008
Grubb & Ellis Company Announces Management Changes
 About Grubb & Ellis
EXHIBIT 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements Nos.
33-3-3040, 333-67581, 333-67581-01,  333-67581-02,  333-67581-03,  333-67581-04,
333-72979 and 333-67579 on Form S-3 and Registration  Statements Nos. 33-3-3042,
33-3-3044,  333-27987,  333-95497  and  333-103009  on Form  S-8 of  UnionBanCal
Corporation  of our report  dated  January 15, 2003 (which  report  expresses an
unqualified  opinion and  includes an  explanatory  paragraph  referring  to the
change in the Company's method of accounting for previously  recognized goodwill
and  intangible  assets),  appearing  in this  Annual  Report on Form  10-K/A of
UnionBanCal Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
    Deliotte & Touche LLP

San Francisco, California
July 9, 2003
Bird, Patrick 

From: Crawford, Jeff S <Jeff.S.Crawford@maine.gov> 

Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 11 :05 AM 

To: Bird, Patrick 

Cc: McDonnell, Ida 

Subject: RE: Maine PSD SIP - Clarifications 

Pat: 

You are correct on both counts: 1) December 12, 2012 is the correct date for determining permitting requirements for 

condensable particulate matter; and 2) the Department is submitting only its recent most recent amendments to 

Chapter 100 (namely: amendments to the definition of "ambient increment" at Chapter 100.11; amendments to a 

portion of the definition of "regulated pollutant" at Chapter 100.149(1); and amendments to the definition of 

" significant emissions increase" at Chapter 100.156) for inclusion in the SIP. 

Jeff 

From: Bird, Patrick [mailto:Bird.Patrick@epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 11:30 AM 

To: Crawford, Jeff S 

Subject: Maine PSD SIP - Clarifications 

Hi Jeff, 

As I move to finalize the Maine SIP submittals concerning the State's PSD permitting program, I would like clarification 

on two points: 

1. The definitions of PM2.5 and PM10 contain reference to an unspecified date which impacts permitting 

requirements for condensable particulate matter. Based on conversations with you and your staff, we are 

under the impression the date referenced in these definitions is December 1, 2012. This date corresponds with 

the effective date of the regulation which most recently amended these definitions. We are looking for 

confirmation on this interpretation. 

2. The May 31, 2016 letter from Marc Cone, Director of the Bureau of Air Quality at Maine DEP to David Conroy, 

Chief of the Air Programs Branch at EPA Region 1 seeks approval and inclusion into the Maine SIP of recent 

amendments to Maine's Chapter 100 Definition Regulation. Maine's most recent rulemaking on Chapter 100 

consisted of amendments to the definition of "ambient increment" at Chapter 100.11; amendments to a 

portion of the definition of "regulated pollutant" at Chapter 100.149(1); and amendments to the definition of 

"significant emissions increase" at Chapter 100.156. Based on Maine' s May 31, 2016 letter, we intend to limit 

approval to these specific provisions. We are seeking confirmation that Maine's most recent Chapter 100 

rulemaking only amended those definitions. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly. 

Thank you, 

Pat 

Patrick Bird 

U.S. EPA - Region 1 

1 
5 Post Office Square, OEPOS-2 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Phone: 617-918-1287 

Fax: 617-918-0287 

Email: bird.patrick@epa.gov 

2
CORRECTED OPINION

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8368

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DAVID ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, a/k/a David Stewart, a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Eric Conrad Smith, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:96-cr-00041-JRS-3)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 30, 2009 Corrected Opinion Filed: August 28, 2009

Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Zebrowski appeals a district court order granting his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). Under the amendments to the Guidelines, Zebrowski’s total offense level was 39. His amended range of imprisonment was 292 to 365 months’ imprisonment. On October 15, 2008, the court granted Zebrowski’s motion and lowered his original 360-month sentence to 336 months’ imprisonment. In response, Zebrowski filed a timely notice of appeal and a motion for reconsideration. While the appeal was pending, the district court granted the motion for reconsideration and lowered Zebrowski’s sentence to 294 months’ imprisonment. Because the court granted the motion for reconsideration and ordered a new sentence, the appeal from the October 15, 2008 order is moot. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1929

To extend the authority for the Homeless Veterans’ Reintegration Projects

for fiscal years 1997 through 1999, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28, 1996

Mr. WELLSTONE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To extend the authority for the Homeless Veterans’ Reintegration Projects for fiscal years 1997 through 1999,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

4 (a) HOMELESS VETERANS’ REINTEGRATION

5 PROJECTS.—Section 738(e)(1) of the Stewart B. McKin6 ney Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11448(e)(1)) is

7 amended by adding at the end the following:

8 ‘‘(E) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1997.

9 ‘‘(F) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1998.

10 ‘‘(G) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1999.’’.
2

•S 1929 IS

1 (b) GENERAL AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA2 TIONS.—Section 739(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 11449(a))

3 is amended by striking out ‘‘the fiscal years 1994 and

4 1995’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘fiscal years 1994

5 through 1999’’.

6 (c) EXTENSION OF PROGRAM.—Section 741 of such

7 Act (42 U.S.C. 11450) is amended by striking out ‘‘De8 cember 31, 1997’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘Septem9 ber 30, 1999’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 5572]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01701]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]


Indian Gaming; Approval of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
Amendment in the State of Louisiana

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Amendment to the 
Tribal-State Compact for the Conduct of Class III Gaming between the 
Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana (Tribe) and the State of Louisiana 
(State).

DATES: The amendment takes effect on January 29, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bff6d1dbd6ded1f8ded2d6d1d8ffddd6de91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc85a2a8a5ada28bada1a5a2ab8caea5ade2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>; (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the 
Secretary. The Amendment removes section 12 subpart (C) from the 
Tribe's Compact. The Amendment is approved.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2024-01701 Filed 1-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 217 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 217

              For the relief of Rose-Marie Barbeau-Quinn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 12 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

 Mr. Hatfield (for himself and Mr. Packwood) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              For the relief of Rose-Marie Barbeau-Quinn.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Rose-Marie 
Barbeau-Quinn shall be held and considered to have been lawfully 
admitted to the United States for permanent residence as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Rose-Marie Barbeau-
Quinn as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct 
the proper officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal 
year the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the 
country of the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 Form 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 7, 2008
 SM&A
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    0-23585
    
    33-0080929(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)4695 MacArthur Court, 8th Floor, Newport Beach, California
    
    92660(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (949) 975-1550
 Not Applicable
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESExhibit ListEXHIBIT 99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
   
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  August 7, 2008
    
    SM&ABy:
    
    /s/ James R. EckstaedtName:
    
    James R. EckstaedtTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President, Financeand Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit List
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release dated August 7, 2008
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Martin E. Thorp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by In Veritas Medical
      Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.





December
      14, 2007





*/s/
      Martin E. Thorp*


Martin
      E.
      Thorp


Chief
      Financial Officer