alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Gary Rasmussen, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

May 20, 2007



/s/ Gary Rasmussen

Gary Rasmussen

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.34
On January 31, 2017, the Board of Directors of SCYNEXIS, Inc. took the following compensation actions with respect to SCYNEXIS’s following executive officers (collectively, the “Officers”):
2016 Officer Bonuses
Approved cash bonuses for the Officers based on SCYNEXIS’s performance for the calendar year 2016:
	
					
	Executive Officer
	 
	Title
	



	Bonus

	Marco Taglietti, M.D.
	 
	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$210,100

	David Angulo, M.D.
	 
	Chief Medical Officer
	 
	$136,600

	Eric Francois
	 
	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$113,000






2017 Salaries


Approved the 2017 salaries for the Officers, to be effective March 1, 2017, as follows:
	
					
	Executive Officer
	 
	Title
	



	2017 Salary

	Marco Taglietti, M.D.
	 
	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$510,000

	David Angulo, M.D.
	 
	Chief Medical Officer
	 
	$413,800

	Eric Francois
	 
	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$360,500






Option Grants
Approved stock option grants under SCYNEXIS 's 2014 Equity Incentive Plan to the following Officers:
	
					
	Executive Officer
	 
	Title
	



	Shares subject to Option

	Marco Taglietti, M.D.
	 
	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	360,000

	David Angulo, M.D.
	 
	Chief Medical Officer
	 
	140,000

	Eric Francois
	 
	Chief Financial Officer
	 
	100,000






The options have an exercise price of $3.02 per share and vest on a monthly basis over a four-year period, provided such officer is continuing to provide services to SCYNEXIS on such vesting date.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
   
We hereby consent to the use in the Prospectus constituting part of this
Registration Statement on Form S-2 of our report dated February 17, 1997
relating to the financial statements of Datum Inc., which appears in such
Prospectus. We also consent to the application of such report to the Financial
Statement Schedule for the three years ended December 31, 1996 appearing on page
S-1 of this Registration Statement when such schedule is read in conjunction
with the financial statements referred to in our report. The audits referred to
in such report also included these Financial Statement Schedules. We also
consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts" and "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" in such Prospectus. However, it should be noted
that Price Waterhouse LLP has not prepared or certified such "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data."
    
 
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
 
Costa Mesa, California
   
March 5, 1997
EX-32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned
Principal Executive Officer of  McKenzie Bay International, Ltd.  (the
"Company"),  hereby certifies, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly
Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company  for  the  quarter ended  March 31, 2004
(the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act  of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the
Report  fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and
results of operations of the Company

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ Gary L. Westerholm
----------------------
Gary L. Westerholm
Principal Executive Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 318

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make preferential treatment

an unlawful employment practice, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resourses

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make preferential

treatment an unlawful employment practice, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights Restora5 tion Act of 1995’’.

6 SEC. 2. PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT.

7 (a) UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE.—Section

8 703(j) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.(j)) is amend9 ed to read as follows:
2

S 318 IS

1 ‘‘(j)(1) It shall be an unlawful employment practice

2 for any entity that is an employer, employment agency,

3 labor organization, or joint labor-management committee

4 subject to this title to grant preferential treatment to any

5 individual or group with respect to selection for, discharge

6 from, compensation for, or the terms, conditions, or privi7 leges of, employment or union membership, on the basis

8 of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of such

9 individual or group, for any purpose, except as provided

10 in subsection (e) or paragraph (2).

11 ‘‘(2) It shall not be an unlawful employment practice

12 for an entity described in paragraph (1) to undertake af13 firmative action designed to recruit individuals of an

14 underrepresented race, color, religion, sex, or national ori15 gin, to expand the applicant pool of the individuals seeking

16 employment or union membership with the entity.’’.

17 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in the amendment

18 made by subsection (a) shall be construed to affect the

19 authority of courts to remedy intentional discrimination

20 under section 706(g) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42

21 U.(g)).

Æ
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSF Group Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 3rd Quarter 2004 ending December 27,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John M. Meyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

| |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                    
| |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                    
| |  |  |  | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ John M. Meyer      
| |                        
| | John M. Meyer          
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | February 10, 2004      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
September 2~~0 14 

Memorandum 

Subject: September 25, 2014 Meeting Between the American Petroleum Institute 

(API), API Members and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) 

From: Chris 

Outreach 

Stoneman, 

andJnformation 

Policy Advisor 

Division, 

~ ~ 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) 

To: Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 

This memorandum to docket provides a brief summary of the main discussion points 

made at the subject meeting for the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR): 

"Managing Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Production in Indian Country," (79 

Federal Register 32502, June 5, 2104); and proposed rulemaking: "General Permits and 

Permits by Rule for the Federal Minor New Source Review Program in Indian Country," 

(79 Federal Register 41846, July 17, 2014). 

Meeting details: 

When: September 25, 2014; 1:00-3:30 p.m. ET 

Where: EPA Offices, RTP, NC 

Participants: 

Bruce Moore, U.S. EPA, OAQPS 

Cheryl Vetter, U.S. EPA, OAQPS 

Chris Stoneman, U.S. EPA, OAQPS 

Claudia Smith, U.S. EPA, Region 8 

Dee Rothery, U.S. EPA, Region 8 

Greg Green, U.S. EPA, OAQPS 

Greg Nizich, U.S. EPA, OAQPS 

Lourdes Morales, U.S. EPA, OAQPS 

Amanda San Miguel, Marathon Oil 

Angela Zickovich, Anadarko 

Becky Keogh, BHP Billitort Petroleum 

Bill Wehrum, Hunton & 

Williams 

Bob King, WPX 

Grover Campbell, Devon Energy 

James Ashe, Enterprise 

Products 

Jeffrey Adams, BP 

Jenny Yang, Conoco Phillips 

Jim Sewell, Shell 

John McMichael, XTO 

Kenyatta Miles, Shell 

Matthew Todd, API 

Nica Hoshija, WPX 

Shankar Ananthakrishna, Chevron 

Tom Monahan, XTO 

Ursula Rick, WEA 

The EPA met with API and its members at the energy organization's request. During the 

meeting, API presented its comments on the two subject EPA actions in the following 

areas: 

• Existing oil and natural gas sources; 
-. PrOvis1 ns n1otninCI. n-atural ga-s:perrnits fcH' nonattaiffmef'lT areas;-

• Permitting method; 

• Permit issuance; 

• Range of permit content issues; 

• Revisions to the scope of operations covered by the oil and gas production 

segment permitting mechanism; 

• Reconsidering all of the potentially relevant emission points of the oil and gas 

production segment; 

• Covering all relevant pollutants in the permitting mechanism; 

• Conduct of any needed ambient air quality monitoring itself; 

• Requirement for third party compliance verification; 

• Establishment of automatic penalties; and 

• Requirements for engines used in the oil and natural gas sector. 

The EPA answered basic questions about the content of the ANPR and offered to be 

available for further discussions and/or exchanges of technical information. 

This memorandum will be filed in the docket for the above actions and will be available 

for public review.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.01
                                                   Bigmar, Inc. 1998, Form 10-K


The Board of Directors
Bigmar, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 
333-43627 and No. 333-64899) on Forms S-3 of Bigmar, Inc. of our report dated 
March 5, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Bigmar, Inc. 
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and 1997, and the related 
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows 
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998.  Our 
report, which appears on page F2 in the December 31, 1998, annual report on 
Form 10-K of Bigmar, Inc. contains an explanatory paragraph that states that 
the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and anticipates it 
will require additional financing to fund its operations during 1999, and 
these factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a 
going concern.  The consolidated financial statements do not include any 
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

KPMG LLP

Columbus, Ohio
March 29, 1999
EXHIBIT 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT



|                                    |  |                        |  |                                 
|----------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|                                    |  | Place of Incorporation |  | Names under which doing business
|                                    |  |                       
|1. Cellular Express, Inc.           |  | Massachusetts          |  | Boston Communications Group     
|                                    |  |                       
|2. BCG Securities Corp.             |  | Massachusetts          |  | Boston Communications Group     
|                                    |  |                       
|3. Wireless Funding Solutions, Inc. |  | Delaware               |  | Boston Communications Group     
|                                    |  |                       
|4. BCGI Billing Services, Inc.      |  | Delaware               |  | Boston Communications Group     
|                                    |  |                       
|5. BCGI Wireless Private Limited    |  | India                  |  | BCGI Wireless Private Limited   
|                                    |  |                       
|6. PureSight Technologies, LTD      |  | Israel                 |  | PureSight Technologies, LTD     
|                                    |  |                       
|7. BCG De Mexico                    |  | Mexico                 |  | BCG De Mexico
II

Calendar No. 5

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 26

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make preferential treatment

an unlawful employment practice, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 4, 1995

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

JANUARY 5, 1995

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make preferential

treatment an unlawful employment practice, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Civil Rights Restora5 tion Act of 1995’’.
2

S 26 PCS

1 SEC. 2. PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT.

2 (a) UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE.—Section

3 703(j) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.(j)) is amend4 ed to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(j)(1) It shall be an unlawful employment practice

6 for any entity that is an employer, employment agency,

7 labor organization, or joint labor-management committee

8 subject to this title to grant preferential treatment to any

9 individual or group with respect to selection for, discharge

10 from, compensation for, or the terms, conditions, or privi11 leges of, employment or union membership, on the basis

12 of the race, color, religion, sex, or national origin of such

13 individual or group, for any purpose, except as provided

14 in subsection (e) or paragraph (2).

15 ‘‘(2) It shall not be an unlawful employment practice

16 for an entity described in paragraph (1) to undertake af17 firmative action designed to recruit individuals of an

18 underrepresented race, color, religion, sex, or national ori19 gin, to expand the applicant pool of the individuals seeking

20 employment or union membership with the entity.’’.

21 (b) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in the amendment

22 made by subsection (a) shall be construed to affect the

23 authority of courts to remedy intentional discrimination

24 under section 706(g) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42

25 U.(g)).

Calendar No. 5

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 26

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to make

practice, and for other purposes.preferential treatment an unlawful employment

JANUARY 5, 1995

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00097-CR

RENE GUTIERREZ

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-CR-0312-E(S1)

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 22, 2019
CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
 Date: January 30, 2009/s/ Michael J. RockenbachMichael J. RockenbachExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial   Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 297 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 297

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion 
               from gross income for veterans' benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 1995

 Mr. Rockefeller (for himself, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Graham, Mr. Akaka, Mr. 
  Campbell, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Bingman) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the exclusion 
               from gross income for veterans' benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Tax Fairness Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF VETERANS' BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 134 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain military benefits) is amended 
to read as follows:
    ``(a) General Rule.--Gross income shall not include--
            ``(1) any qualified military benefit, and
            ``(2) any allowance or benefit administered by the 
        Secretary of Veterans Affairs which is received by a veteran 
        (as defined in section 101 of title 38, United States Code) or 
        a dependent or survivor of a veteran.''
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Paragraph (3) of section 137(a) of such 
Code is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3) Benefits under laws administered by the Secretary of 
        Veterans Affairs, see section 5301 of title 38, United States 
        Code.''
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1984.
                                 <all>
```