alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



Compañía de Minas Buenaventura
S.A.A.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



| | 1. | I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the “Company”).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | (A)      	The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2015 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(B)       	The information
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 2, 2016



| | /s/ Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos
| | -----------------------------
| | Carlos E. Gálvez Pinillos    
| | Chief Financial Officer      



E-13.2
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


LEV
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


FORM
      10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I
      am the
      Chief Executive Officer of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation
      (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form
      10-QSB of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
      the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
      in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November
              14, 2005
            By:
            /s/ Joshua
              D. Schein, Ph. D.Joshua
                D. Schein, Ph.D.
              Chief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Statement

Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the
undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 1, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                      |  |                                                              
|------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|                    |  |                     
|Dated: May 14, 2007 |  |                      |  | /s/ Thomas J. Ferree                                         
|                    |  | Name:                |  | Thomas J. Ferree                                             
|                    |  | Title:               |  | Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PERCY LEE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 100 EM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2018, Petitioner Percy Lee’s Application for 

Exercise of Extraordinary Relief is hereby DENIED.

Chief Justice Saylor and Justices Baer and Todd did not participate in the 

consideration or decision of this matter.
*Agenda times are approximate and subject to change depending upon the discussion.

US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

HUMAN STUDIES REVIEW BOARD

JANUARY 2013 PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA

Environmental Protection Agency Conference Center

Lobby Level - One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.) 

2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202 

Thursday, January 17, 2013

HSRB WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/

Docket Telephone: (202) 566 1752

Docket Number: EPA–HQ–ORD–2012–0892

1:00 PM* Convene Public Meeting – Jim Downing, Designated Federal Officer, EPA 

Human Studies Review Board, Office of the Science Advisor

Introduction of Board Members –Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH, HSRB Chair

Welcome - Glenn Paulson, Ph.D., Science Advisor, EPA

Opening Remarks – Steven Bradbury, Ph.D., Director, Office of Pesticide 

Programs (OPP), Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, EPA

Follow-up on Previous HSRB Recommendations – Mr. William Jordan, OPP, 

Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, EPA

Session 1: A completed study report from the Antimicrobial Exposure Assessment Task 

Force II (AEATF) in which the dermal and inhalation exposure of professional 

janitorial workers was monitored as they poured liquid antimicrobial pesticide 

products from conventional or reduced-splash containers into different sizes 

and types of receiving containers. EPA seeks the advice of the HSRB on the 

scientific soundness of this completed research and on its appropriateness for use in 

estimating exposure that results from pouring liquid antimicrobial pesticide 

products. EPA also seeks the advice of the HSRB on whether available information 

supports a determination that the study was conducted in substantial compliance 

with subparts K and L of 40 CFR Part 26.

1:40 PM EPA Science Review – Mr. Tim Leighton, (OPP, EPA), Jonathan Cohen, Ph.D. 

ICF International

2:15 PM Board Questions of Clarification – Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH (HSRB Chair), 

EPA, Principal Investigator/Sponsor

2:45 PM EPA Ethics Assessment - Ms. Kelly Sherman (OPP, EPA)

3:15 PM Board Questions of Clarification – Rebecca Parkin, Ph.D., MPH (HSRB Chair), 

EPA, Principal Investigator/Sponsor

3:45 PM Break

3:55 PM Public Comments 

4:05 PM Board Discussion 
*Agenda times are approximate and subject to change depending upon the discussion.

Charge to the Board - Science:

 Was the research reported in the Antimicrobial Exposure Assessment Task Force II

 (AEATF) completed liquid pour study report (AEA05) faithful to the design and 

objectives of the protocol and governing documents of AEATF?

 Has EPA adequately characterized, from a scientific perspective, the limitations on these 

data that should be considered when using the data in estimating the exposure of people 

who pour liquid antimicrobial pesticide products?

Charge to the Board - Ethics:

 Does available information support a determination that the study was conducted in

substantial compliance with subparts K and L of 40 CFR Part 26?

5:00 PM* Adjourn
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-51208 Summary Calendar

BROCK PURVIANCE, Petitioner-Appellant

v. CLAUDE MAYE, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Bastrop, Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CV-255

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Brock Purviance, former federal pri soner # 34230-013, filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus pe t i ti o n in the Western District of Texas challenging Bureau of Prison (BOP) regulations that categorically excluded him from eligibility for early release upon completion of a residential drug treatment program. Th e district court dismissed the petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 29, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-51208 Document: 00511585985 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2011No. 10-51208

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby , 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). “Whether an appeal is moot is a jurisdictional matter, since it implicates the Art i c l e III requirement that there be a live case or controversy.” Bailey v. Southerland , 821 F.2d 277, 278 (5th Cir. 1987). According to the BOP website, Purviance was released from prison on July 15, 2011, and his prison sentence can therefore no longer be shortened. Cf. United States v. Booker , ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 2505070, at *1 (5th Cir. June 24, 2011) (relying on the prison release date shown on the BOP website to find that the appellant’s claim was moot). Although a district court may alte r a petitioner’s period o f supervised release in an appropriate case pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1) or (2), United States v. Johnson, 529 U.S. 53, 60 (2000), the dist ri c t c o u rt in this case lacks jurisdiction to grant such relief with respect to Purviance’s 25-year term of supervised release. The sentencing court has jurisdiction over that issue, see § 3583(e), and Purvi a n c e was sentenced in another district. A sentencing court can t r a n s f e r such jurisdiction to another district co u rt , s e e 18 U.S.C. § 3605, but no transfer occurred in this case. Therefore, there is no possibility that the district court may al t e r P urviance’s period supervised release under § 3583(e), see Johnson v. Pettiford , 442 F.3d 917, 918 ( 5th Cir. 2 0 0 6) , and we dismiss this appeal as moot. We likewise deny all pending motions as moot. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED.

2 Case: 10-51208 Document: 00511585985 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 296 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 296

To amend section 1977A of the Revised Statutes to equalize the remedies 
available to all victims of intentional employment discrimination, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 1995

  Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Akaka, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Boxer, Mr. 
Bradley, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Inouye, 
    Mr. Lautenberg, Mr. Leahy, Ms. Mikulski, Ms. Moseley-Braun, Mr. 
Moynihan, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Packwood, Mr. Pell, Mr. Robb, Mr. Simon, and 
Mr. Wellstone) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 1977A of the Revised Statutes to equalize the remedies 
available to all victims of intentional employment discrimination, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Remedies Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. EQUALIZATION OF REMEDIES.

    Section 1977A of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1981a), as added 
by section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (3), and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph 
                (3), and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``section--'' and all 
        that follows through the period and inserting ``section, any 
        party may demand a jury trial.''.
                                 <all>
```
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3024529-DEC-201108:47 AM
STATE OF IDAHO REVISED AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL HAZARDOUS WASTE REGULATIONS PROMULGATED JULY 1,2007 TO JULY 1, 2010

SUBMITTED BY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY OCTOBER, 2011
No. 72-6252.

#### Johnson et al. *v.*Ohio.

Ct. App. Ohio, Cuyahoga County. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.
#### Betty RHODES et vir, Appellants, v. Edgar SHERRILL, Jr., Appellee.

No. 13911.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 25, 1962.

See also 352 S.W.2d 249.

T. Kellis Dibrell, San Antonio, Fred V. Klingeman, Karnes City, Dibrell, Gardner & Dotson, San Antonio, for appellants.

J. O.. Faith, Ronald Smallwood, Karnes. City, for appellee.

POPE, Justice.

This is a venue suit. Edgar Sherrill, Jr., and his wife, Betty Sherrill, were divorced in 1954 by the District Court in Karnes County. The decree granted custody of their child to the mother, and restricted her from moving the child from Karnes County without prior consent of the court. She later married Barry Rhodes and they moved with the child to Brazos County. Sherrill filed a pleading in Karnes County asking for a re-adjudication of the custody orders, and also asking that Betty Rhodes be held in contempt for moving the child to Brazos County. Betty Rhodes and her husband filed a plea of privilege. The court granted the plea as to the custody matter but retained venue over the contempt matter. The court ordered that certified copies of the Karnes County proceedings be sent to Brazos County.

As we understand the nature of this appeal, Betty Rhodes and her husband are not complaining about the court’s retaining jurisdiction on the claimed past contempt. The court proceeded to hear that matter and decreed that Betty Rhodes was guilty. See Ex parte Webb, 153 Tex. 234, 266 S.W. 2d 855. What they do complain about is the fact that the court did not order the original papers transferred to Brazos County. They reason that future custody orders as well as future claims of contempt arising out of those orders should be determined in Brazos County. They urge, therefore, that the original papers should have been transferred. Rule 89, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Their complaint is that the trial court’s order implies that future contempt matters might also be conducted in Karnes County, since the original papers are retained there. In our opinion, the order is not subject to that construction. Sending certified copies to Brazos County was a. substantial compliance with Rule 89, and the trial court’s decree on venue does not operate to retain jurisdiction over future violations of custody orders.

The judgment is affirmed.
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
                            (for Gregory B. Sullivan)


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and appoints
Ernest C. Garcia II, Steven T. Darak,  and Steven P. Johnson,  and each of them,
his true and lawful  attorney-in-fact  and agent with full power of substitution
and  resubstitution,  for him and in his name,  place, and stead, in any and all
capacities,  to sign the Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the  fiscal  year ended
December  31,  1998,  for filing with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
("SEC") by Ugly Duckling Corporation, a Delaware corporation,  together with any
and all  amendments  to such Form 10-K,  and to file the same with all  exhibits
thereto,  and all documents in connection  therewith,  with the SEC, granting to
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing  requisite  and necessary to be done
in and about the premises,  as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might
or  could  do  in  person,   hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all  that  such
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.



DATE: February 25, 1999



                                                         /S/ GREGORY B. SULLIVAN
                                                         -----------------------
                                                             GREGORY B. SULLIVAN
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-30787

Summary Calendar

 

The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

Acceptance Insurance Co.,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(99-CV-99–F)

 

January 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This case concerns which insurers are obligated to pay

coverage for an accident that occurred at the Morial Convention

Center in New Orleans. Acceptance Insurance appeals from an order

of the district court that both the Aetna policy and Acceptance’s

policy are primary, and should share jointly in paying coverage.

Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we are convinced

that the district court judgment is correct and should be upheld.

Aetna is not attempting to subrogate into the rights of its
2

insured, nor to seek contribution from its insured, nor to assert

any policy defenses. Rather, Aetna is suing to enforce the terms

of its insurance policy and Acceptance’s policy, which both provide

primary coverage on these facts. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on FormsS-3 (File No. 333-31046, File No. 333-48664, File No. 333-61832, and File No. 333-69718) and Forms S-8 (File No. 333-75351, File No. 333-34999, File No. 333-83225, File No. 333-95569, File No. 333-60148, File No. 333-81856, File No. 333-81854, FileNo. 333-64144, File No. 333-100138, and File No. 333-101700) of AdvancePCS of our report dated May 9, 2003, except with respect to the matter discussed in *Basis of Presentation* in Note 2 relating to the adoption of EITF 02-16, as to which thedate is June 18, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

July 18, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 21 (Wednesday, January 31, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 6111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP24-334-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: 4(d) Rate Filing: Non-Conforming--ESS--PSEG 
Superseding to be effective 3/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 1/23/24.
    Accession Number: 20240123-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/5/24.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary 
to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes.
    For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#de918e8e9eb8bbacbdf0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="642b343424020116074a030b12">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 24, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-01843 Filed 1-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              Jorge A.              Fernandez                                                        |   |   |        |
| Jorge                A. FernandezChief                Financial OfficerNovember                14, 2007 |   |   |        |

----