alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
t~% Post Consumer Recycled Paper

SLO COUNT~J 

## Air Pollution Control District 

# apCu San Luis Obispo County

May 19, 2015 Richard W. Corey California Air Resources Board P0 Box 2815 1001 “1” Street Sacramento CA 95812 SUBJECT: Request for Extension ofJuly 20, 2015 Marginal Attainment Date Dear Mr. Corey, Pursuantto Section 1 81(a)(5) ofthe Clean AirAct (CM), the San Luis Obispo CountyAir Pollution Control District (SLOCAPCD) requests thatthe Air Resources Board (ARB) submit a letterto the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) for a one-year extension ofthe Eastern San Luis Obispo (SLO) County’sJuly 20, 2015 marginal attainment date forthe 2008 8-hour ozone standard. According to Section 1 81(a)(5) ofthe CM, the U.S. EPAAdministrator may grant a nonattainment area a one-year extension ofthe area’s attainment date upon application bythe State iftwo conditions are met: 1. The State must complywith all requirements and commitments pertaining to the area in the applicable implementation plan (Section 181(a)(5)(A)). The SLOCAPCD has complied with all requirements and commitments pertaining to the area in the applicable ozone implementation plan; and 2. The Eastern SLO County nonattainment area’s 4th highest daily 8-hour monitored value during the attainmentyear (2014) is less than 0.075 ppm. On May21, 2012, U.S. EPA designated Eastern SLO County as marginal nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard, effectiveJuly 20, 2012(77 FR 30088). SLOCAPCD’s marginal attainment date isJuly20, 2015, three years afterthe designation effective date. Attainment is based on three years ofquality assured, complete and certified ambient air quality monitoring data. For Eastern SLO County, the defined threeyears to demonstrate attainment ofthe marginal attainment date are 2012, 2013 and 2014. SLOCAPCD did not acheive the 2008 8-hour ozone standard bythe attainment date; however, in the 2014 attainment year, the 4th highest daily maximum 8-hourvalue forthe area is 0.073 ppm, which is below 0.075 ppm.

805.781.5912 805.781 .1002 slocleanair.org 3433 Roberto Court, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401SLOCI4PCD Extension Request

May 19, 2015 Page2of2

SLOCAPCD has met both ofthe criteria to qualifyforan extension of its 2008 8-hour ozone standard marginal attainment date and requestsARB’s assistance to petition U.S. EPAto grantthis extension. We lookforward to U.S. EPA approval ofthis requestfora one-year extension ofthe attainment date. Ifyou have any questions, please call Aeron Arlin Genet at 805-781-5998.

LNga/arr CC: Carol Sutkus, CARB (via email, carol.sutkuscoarb.ca.gpv) Monica Lewis, CARB (via email, monica.lewisaarb.ca.gov) LarryAllen Air Pollution Control Officer

H:~PLAN~Attainment_PIanning\ozone~ozone1yrExtensjon2o1 5\OnevearExtensionRequestsLocounty.docx

### Table I Fourth Highest 8-hour Ozone Average Daily Maximums

and Design Values for Eastern San Luis Obispo County

(parts permillion)
Fourth-Highest Monitoring 201 2-2014 8-hour Average Site Design Value Ozone_Concentration

___________________ 2012 2013 2014 Carrizo Plains 0.070 0.075 0.067 0.068 Red Hills 0.076 0.081 0.075 0.073
October 2, 2015

Ms. Jayme Evans

Owner

Evans Above Imaging

6400NE Highway, Suite G

PMB 350

Vancouver, WA 98665

Dear Ms

. Evans :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

part 21; § § 45.23(b), 61.23(a) and (b), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.103(b),

91.109, 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.203(a) and (b) , 91.405 (a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your June 10, 2015, exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2889

, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

sen d us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed in formation relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

a t least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2055 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2055

To waive temporarily the Medicare enrollment composition rules for The 
                             Wellness Plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 5, 1996

Mr. Abraham (for himself and Mr. Levin) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive temporarily the Medicare enrollment composition rules for The 
                             Wellness Plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF MEDICARE ENROLLMENT COMPOSITION RULES FOR THE 
              WELLNESS PLAN.

    The requirements of section 1876(f)(1) of the Social Security Act 
are waived with respect to Comprehensive Health Services, Inc. (doing 
business as The Wellness Plan) for contract periods through December 
31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of ourreport dated April 13, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of AMDL, Inc. (the“Company”) as of December 31, 2006 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,2006 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs relating tothe Company’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), *Share-BasedPayment*, and the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern),appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of AMDL, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006,and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of thisRegistration Statement.        /s/KMJ Corbin & Company LLP
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial
Statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, Bruce
W. Elder, the Principal Financial Officer of Crescent Financial Corporation, in
compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by
Crescent Financial Corporation (the "Issuer") for the quarter ended September
30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented
therein.





Date:   November
      10, 2009
            
            /s/ Bruce W. ElderBruce
      W. ElderPrincipal
      Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000820474
<NAME> OPTIMUM CARE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         706,105
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,167,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,934,012
<PP&E>                                          20,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,382,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          688,451
<BONDS>                                        243,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,014
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,857,899
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,382,891
<SALES>                                      2,950,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,952,487
<CGS>                                        2,179,571
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,507,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                444,994
<INCOME-TAX>                                    44,551
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            400,443
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   400,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.28





FIRST AMENDMENT OF
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
WITH  DONN P. DOMICO 
This FIRST AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of December 18, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), by and among FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. (“FCFP”), FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL BANK (the “Bank,” and together with FCFP, the “Employer”), and DONN P. DOMICO (“Executive,” and together with the Employer, the “Parties”).
RECITALS
A.    The Parties have made and entered into that certain Employment Agreement, effective March 12, 2013 (the “Agreement”).
B.    Pursuant to Section 18 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by written agreement signed by the Parties.
C.    The Parties desire to remove the requirement in the Agreement that Executive be nominated to serve as a member of the Board of Directors of the Bank.
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants of the Parties set forth in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby expressly agree as follows:
1.The fourth sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety (which sentence had provided as follows: “During the Employment Period, Executive shall be nominated to serve as a member of the Bank Board, subject to the election of the applicable shareholders”.
2.In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
[Signature page follows.]






Exhibit 10.28





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of FCFP and the Bank has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf, and Executive acknowledges understanding and acceptance of, and agrees to, the terms of this Amendment, all as of the Effective Date.
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
By: /s/George Barr    
Print Name:         George Barr                
Title:         Chairman of the Board of Directors        
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL BANK
By: /s/George Barr    
Print Name:         George Barr                
Title:         Chairman of the Board of Directors        
DONN P. DOMICO
/s/Donn P. Domico    


2
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    May 15, 2008
    
    By  /s/   Francene LaPoint
    
    Chief Financial Officer,Date
    
    Francene LaPoint
    
    Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC, the Manager of NNN 2003 Value Fund, LLC,(principal financial officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
G. Filer II, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ William G. Filer II
----------------------------------------------
William G. Filer II
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2004


                                     - 23 -
#### William G. HARGIS, Appellant, v. John L. DUMBACHER et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Sept. 14, 1956.

Wm. G. Hargis, Walton, for appellant.

Wm. O. Ware, Covington, for appellees.

PER .CURIAM.

Judgment of the Kenton Circuit Court on a counterclaim adjudging the defendants to have a certain passway and enjoining the plaintiff from interfering with its use.

Appeal is upon notice. The evidence is not brought here. The value of the pass-way is not shown in the record. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Hall v. Ferguson, Ky., 288 S.W.2d 628.

Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial

Statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Bruce W. Elder, the Vice President and Secretary of Crescent Financial Corporation, in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the Form 10-QSB
filed by Crescent Financial Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in
that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                        |  |     |  |                                                          
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ Bruce W. Elder                                       
|                        |  |     |  | Bruce W. Elder                                           
|                        |  |     |  | Vice President and Secretary, Principal Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0615 

_____________________________

JAMIE BOWDEN,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND 

PROFESSIONAL REGULATION,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for the Second Judicial Circuit, 

Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

December 29, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Marie A. Mattox and Ashley N. Richardson of Marie A. Mattox, 

P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Jamie Ito of Ito Law, PLLC, Tallahassee; Brooke Elizabeth Adams

and Joseph Y. Whealdon III, Department of Business and 

Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Thomas R. Moyes, Chief Financial Officer ofMediCor Ltd. (the “Registrant”), certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof the Registrant;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.             The Registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Registrant and have:

 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofthis annual report) that has materially affected, or is likely to materiallyaffect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             The Registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Dated: November 14, 2005 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
| /s/ Thomas R. Moyes           |   |
| Thomas R. Moyes,              |
| Chief Financial Officer       |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin Salinas, Jr., Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 24, 2010



/s/  Martin Salinas,
Jr.Martin Salinas, Jr.Chief Financial Officer


*A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-14921

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:15-cr-00283-LSC-HGD-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK DEWAYNE HALL,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(May 10, 2017)

Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

W. Scott Brower, appointed counsel for Patrick Hall in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

Case: 16-14921 Date Filed: 05/10/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our 

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the 

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Hall’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-14921 Date Filed: 05/10/2017 Page: 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, I, Theodore R. Maloney, certify that:

 

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of MediCor.

 

Date: June 6, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Theodore R. Maloney |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Theodore R. Maloney     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----