alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPENDIX
 EMULEX CORPORATION
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT,
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT, AND
NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
FOR
CHANGE IN CONTROL RETENTION PLAN PARTICIPANTS
OR
EMPLOYEES COVERED BY A KEY EMPLOYEE RETENTION AGREEMENT
 Plan Retention Plan KERA RSA Agreement RSU Agreement NQSO
Agreement
 ADDENDUM TO RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
 1.
    
    Vesting. This provision supplements Section 3 of Grantees RSA Agreement by
adding the following provisions at the end thereof:
    2.
    
    No Right to Continued Service. The last sentence of Section 6 of Grantees RSA
Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows.
  1




---



##### 



ADDENDUM TO RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
 Vesting
    ADDENDUM TO NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AWARD AGREEMENT
  Term and Vesting of Stock Option under Change in Control Retention Plan or Key Employee
Retention Agreement
   Acceleration of Vesting
   Extension of Exercise Period
 2
Amendment to Accenture Ltd Voting Agreement
Pursuant to Section 6.2 of the Voting Agreement, dated as of April 18, 2001, among Accenture Ltd,an exempted company limited by shares organized under the laws of Bermuda (registered numberEC30090) and the Covered Persons (as defined therein) (the “Voting Agreement”), a vote of theEmployee Covered Shares (as defined therein) was held and the Voting Agreement was amended,effective as of November 22, 2004, in the following manner:
1.   Article II was amended by deleting Section 2.4 in its entirety.
2.   Article IV was amended by deleting Sections 4.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4(c) in their entirety.
3.   Article V was amended by deleting Section 5.1 in its entirety.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PSF Group Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal 2nd Quarter 2004 ending September 27,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John M. Meyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                                                        
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ John M. Meyer                                      
| |  |                                                        
| |  | John M. Meyer
Chief Executive Officer
November 11, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2015 - 5806 Directorate ID : 2015 - SW - 083 - AD Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS350B3 helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 427 Helicopters in the US Registry . Re ason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent takeoff without hydraulic pressure in the tail rotor (T/R) hydraulic system, loss of T/R flight control, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 work hours X $ 85 for the RFM revision ) $ 43 Total Cost per Helicopter $43 Total U . S . Fleet Cost $18,361 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD signi ficant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Stephen Barbini
#### Francisco Antonio JUAN, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE; The United States Attorney General, John Ashcroft, Respondents.

No. 02-1568.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 17, 2002.

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

Donald L. Schlemmer, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richard M. Evans, Assistant Director, Marion E. Guyton, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Francisco Juan, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s order finding Juan removable and denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. The Board and immigration judge’s determination that Juan is not eligible for asylum must be upheld unless that determination is “manifestly contrary to law.” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(C) (2000). We have reviewed the administrative record and find no error in the Board and immigration judge’s conclusion that Juan failed to establish a well-founded fear of persecution. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (2000); *M.A. v. INS,*899 F.2d 304, 307 (4th Cir.1990) (en banc). Accordingly, we deny Juan’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Exhibit 10.1


 








FORM OF


 





LOCK-UP AGREEMENT


 


This Lock-Up Agreement
(the “Agreement”) of the undersigned holder of Series E Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Preferred
Stock”), dated as of the 8th day of March 2017, is by and between Inventergy Global, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”) and the undersigned holder (the “Holder”), which shares of Preferred Stock were
issued pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2016 (as amended, the “Securities Purchase
Agreement”), and with the terms and conditions set forth in that certain Certificate of Designation issued in connection
therewith (the “Certificate of Designation”). Capitalized terms that are not otherwise defined herein shall
have the meanings given to such terms in the Securities Purchase Agreement and the Certificate of Designation.


 


NOW THEREFORE,
in consideration of the agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree that until after March 31, 2017, the undersigned Holder shall not offer,
sell, contract to sell, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise dispose of (or enter into any transaction which is designed to, or might
reasonably be expected to, result in the disposition (whether by actual disposition or effective economic disposition due to cash
settlement or otherwise) by the undersigned Holder or any Affiliate of the undersigned Holder or any person in privity with the
undersigned holder or any Affiliate of the undersigned Holder), directly or indirectly, shares of Common Stock of the Company received
by the undersigned upon conversion of the Series E Preferred Stock, for less than $0.50 per share, subject to adjustment for reverse
and forward stock splits and the like.


 


The Company shall
issue a press release or file a Current Report on Form 8-K announcing the material terms of this Agreement. Except as specifically
provided herein, this Agreement shall not operate as an Agreement or waiver of any other provisions of the Securities Purchase
Agreement or the Certificate of Designation, or any other documents, instruments or agreements executed and/or delivered under
or in connection therewith. This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in one or more counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement. Any signature delivered
by a party by e-mail or facsimile transmission shall be deemed to be an original signature hereto.


 


**********************



 




     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Agreement has been duly executed as of the day and year first written above.


 


	INVENTERGY GLOBAL, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:		 
	Name:	Joseph W. Beyers	 
	Title:	Chairman & CEO	 


 


	Name of Holder: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Signature of Authorized Signatory of Holder: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Name of Authorized Signatory: 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Title of Authorized Signatory: 	 	 


 








    	 	 2
EXHIBIT 31.2
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    (EXCHANGE ACT
    RULE 13a-14(a)
    or 15d-14(a))
    Form 10-K/A
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)) Rules 13a-15(f) 15d-15(f))
                
    (Financial and Accounting Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 1.1
 Translated from French -
 FLAMEL TECHNOLOGIES
 A joint stock company with a share capital of  2,925,755
Registered office located at VENISSIEUX (Rhône) Parc Club du Moulin à Vent
33, avenue du Docteur Georges Lévy
 R.C.S. LYON B 379.001.530
 BY LAWS
 Updated as of March 28, 2007
 ARTICLE 1  FORM
  ARTICLE 2  CORPORATE NAME
 FLAMEL TECHNOLOGIES.
  ARTICLE 3  COMPANY PURPOSE




---



##### 



- Translated from French -
 ARTICLE 4  REGISTERED OFFICE
  département département
 ARTICLE 5  DURATION
  ARTICLE 6  SHARE CAPITAL
 
 ARTICLE 7  FISCAL YEAR
   ARTICLE 8  ALLOCATION OF THE PROFITS
   ARTICLE 9  TYPE OF THE SHARES
   ARTICLE 10  SALE AND ASSIGNMENT OF SHARES
  2
       - Translated from French -
      ARTICLE 11  RIGHTS AND DUTIES ATTACHED TO THE SHARES
     ARTICLE 12  PAYMENT OF THE SHARE CAPITAL
  départment
  ARTICLE 13  BOARD OF DIRECTORS
   3




---



##### 



- Translated from French -
    ARTICLE 14  DELIBERATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
       Conseil dEtat
    ARTICLE 15  POWERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
    4




---



##### 



- Translated from French -
 ARTICLE 16  CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
     ARTICLE 17  GENERAL MANAGEMENT
 Directeur Général
        5




---



##### 



- Translated from French -
     ARTICLE 18  STATUTORY AUDITORS
   ARTICLE 19  GENERAL MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS
    -
    
    the registration of the shareholder in the Companys share accounts for owners of registered shares,-
    
    the deposit, at the place indicated in the calling notice, of a certificate of account
registration issued by the bank, the financial establishment or the stockbroker, depositary of
the shares, as the case may be, for the owners of bearer shares.
      Conseil dEtat
 6




---



##### 



- Translated from French -
  ARTICLE 20  POWERS AND RESOLUTIONS OF THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETINGS
  ARTICLE 21  DISSOLUTION  LIQUIDATION
  ARTICLE 22  DISPUTES
    7
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1933 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1933

 To authorize a certificate of documentation for certain vessels, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 1996

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize a certificate of documentation for certain vessels, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATES OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of 
title 46, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue 
a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for 
employment in the coastwise trade for each of the following vessels:
            (1) The vessel RELENTLESS, United States official number 
        287008.
            (2) The vessel TECUMSEH, United States official number 
        668633.
            (3) The vessel POLICY MAKER III, United States official 
        number 569223.
            (4) The vessel QUIET SQUAW, United States official number 
        998717.
                                 <all>
```
FILED WITH FAA AIRCRAFT REGISTRATION Bl\ 

## 201Y OEG 

## 31 PrJ 

## 2YY

OKLAHOMA CITY OKLAHOMA
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
I, Harry L. You, Chief Financial Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general partnerof Accenture SCA (the “Registrant”), certify that:
1. I have reviewed the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented inthis quarterly report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the Registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
Dated: July 9, 2004    /s/ HARRY L. YOU
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ICT Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 31, 2003 (the Report), I, John J. Brennan, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify, based on my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                                       |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Dated as of March 31, 2003 Executed on August 27, 2003 |  | 
|                                                       |  | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to ICT Group, Inc. and will be retained by ICT Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 13.1



Compañía de Minas Buenaventura
S.A.A.
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



Pursuant to the requirements
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:



| | 1. | I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (the “Company”).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | (A)       The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2014 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange
Act”); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



(B)       The information
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 30, 2015



| | /s/ Roque Benavides Ganoza
| | --------------------------
| | Roque Benavides Ganoza    
| | Chief Executive Officer
The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1387

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the 

* Southern District of Iowa.

Miguel Angel Cervantes, also known *

as Rocky Cervantes, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: March 18, 1998

 Filed: March 26, 1998

___________

Before LOKEN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Miguel Angel Cervantes challenges his convictions for conspiring to distribute

marijuana and using a communication facility to distribute marijuana, and the resulting

60-month sentence imposed by the district court. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant 1

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and has moved to withdraw. After

carefully reviewing the record, we conclude that Cervantes&s Speedy Trial Act and
-2-

double jeopardy claims, to the extent they may be raised, are without merit. See United

States v. McFarland, 116 F.3d 316, 318 (8th Cir.) (defendant waived Speedy Trial Act

violation by failing to move for dismissal; seven-month delay between indictment and

trial did not violate Sixth Amendment right to speedy trial), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 394

(1997); United States v. Bentley, 82 F.3d 222, 223 (8th Cir. 1996) (defendant&s failure

to raise double jeopardy argument in district court constitutes waiver); United States

v. Basile, 109 F.3d 1304, 1306-07 (8th Cir.) (dual sovereignty doctrine permits both

state and federal governments to punish same individual for same act), cert. denied, 118

S. Ct. 173, and cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 189 (1997).

We have reviewed the record for any nonfrivolous issues in accordance with

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and find none.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed and counsel&s motion

to withdraw is granted.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2159 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2159

        To set the time for the convening of the 105th Congress

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 1996

     Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To set the time for the convening of the 105th Congress

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the 1st Session of 
the 105th Congress shall convene at noon on January 7th, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:21 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: RE: Legal briefing for OMB on Thurs. 4/10

Interagency, including DOJ (staff).

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:54 AM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Subject: FW: Legal briefing for OMB on Thurs. 4/10

Cortney –

Is the legal issues discussion just with the EOP folks, or will everyone from the interagency group be participating?

thanx!

bob

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. Leader, Energy Strategies Group U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs Division

Mail Code D243-01 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Office: (919) 541-1045 Cell: (919) 306-2290 Fax: (919) 541-5450

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov

************************************* DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt

*************************************