alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit****31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuantto Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Harry Brill, certify that:

 

1.  I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gladstone Capital Corporation;

 

2.  Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresas of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

c) disclosed in this report any changes in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: August 3,2005

 
| /s/  HARRY BRILL                  |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Harry Brill                            |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

** **

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** **

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, ColinW. Stewart, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Nancy C. Broadbent,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ Colin W.  Stewart    |             |
|--------|--------------------------|------------------|
| Dated: | March 16,  2006     | Colin W. Stewart |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |
|        |                          |                  |  |

 

 
|   | /s/ Nancy C.  Broadbent |                |
|--------|-------------------------|---------------------|
| Dated: | March 16,  2006    | Nancy C.  Broadbent |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                         |                     |  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to CollaGenexPharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Exhibit 10.07.02.01


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE
AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to the Asset Purchase
Agreement (“Amendment”), is entered into as of May 25, 2016, and amends the Asset Purchase Agreement for FM Translator
construction permit W222BT, FCC Facility ID 142973, made and entered into as of the 18th of May, 2016 (the “Agreement”),
by and between Delmarva Educational Association (“Seller”) and Pennsylvania Media Associates, Inc. (“Buyer”).


 


RECITAL


 


The purpose of this Amendment is to change
the proposed primary station to be designated in the modification of the Permit that Buyer is allowed to file under the Agreement.


 


AGREEMENT


 


In consideration of the mutual covenants
and agreements set forth herein, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


 


1.          Amendment
to Section 10. Section 10 of the Agreement shall be amended by deleting the existing second sentence of that Section and
replacing it with the following sentence: “Such application shall be prepared and filed in accordance with the procedure
specified by the FCC pursuant to MB Docket 13-249 to request modifications to the Permit and/or a change in the transmitter site
for the Permit to a location designated by Buyer which, if approved by the FCC, will permit the Translator to be used as a fill-in
for Buyer’s Class B AM radio station WTLN(AM).”


 


2.          Continued
Effect of the Agreement. All capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement. Except
as expressly modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
and be binding on the parties. This Amendment may not be modified, renewed, extended, or discharged except by a further amendment
to the Agreement in writing, signed by both parties.


 


3.          Effective
Date of this Amendment. This Amendment shall be effective as of May 25, 2016.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.


 


	PENNSYLVANIA MEDIA ASSOCIATES, INC.	 	DELMARVA EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION
	 	 	 
	/s/ Christopher J. Henderson	 	/s/ Nancy. A. Epperson
	By: Christopher J. Henderson	 	By: Nancy A. Epperson
	Its: Senior Vice President/Secretary	 	Its: President


 




    	 	Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
Registration Statements of Post Properties, Inc. and Post Apartment Homes, L.P.
of our report dated March 15, 2005 relating to the financial statements,
financial statement schedule, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K:

Form S-3 (No. 333-36595)
Form S-3 (No. 333-42884)
Form S-3 (No. 333-55994)


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 15, 2005
#### SIERRA LAKE RESERVE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The CITY OF ROCKLIN; The Rocklin Mobile Home Rent Review Commission; Carlos Urrutia; Rusty Selix; Rudolf Michaels; George Paras, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-15371.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 16, 1993.

*663Before GOODWIN, KOZINSKI and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The “[t]wo recent state court opinions [that] refused to follow our decision in *Hall [v. City of Santa Barbara,*833 F.2d 1270 (9th Cir.1986)],” *Sierra Lake Reserve v. City of Rocklin,*938 F.2d 951, 955 (9th Cir.1991), have proven prescient. *See Yee v. City of Escondido,*— U.S.-,-, 112 S.Ct. 1522, 1527, 1531, 118 L.Ed.2d 153 (1992). We therefore vacate Part I of the *Sierra Lake Reserve*opinion, which dealt with the physical taking claim. We retain Part II because the due process and equal protection claims it considered are unaffected by *Yee. See*— U.S. at-, 112 S.Ct. at 1531. We express no opinion on whether the city ordinance could constitute a regulatory taking — a question *Yee*leaves open, *see id.*— because no regulatory taking argument was made to us or the court below.
February 11, 2002


Steven Darak


Re: Severance Agreement



Dear Steve:

Ugly Duckling  Corporation,  a Delaware  corporation  and its  subsidiaries  and
affiliates (collectively, the "Duck") and yourself have entered into a Severance
Agreement  of even  date  with  the  date of this  letter,  which  agreement  is
effective January 31, 2002 (the "Effective Date").

In  connection  with your  severance  arrangement  with the Duck, it is also our
intent to address  certain  notes and/or  advances that the Duck has made to you
over the course of your  employment with the Duck. You entered into a Promissory
Note, dated May 15, 1998 (the "Note"), payable to the Duck for $100,000.00.  The
proceeds  of the Note were used to  purchase  10,000  shares of Duck  Stock (the
"Purchased  Stock").  The Duck has also made other loans and/or  advances to you
(the "Advances").  The Note and the Advances,  in the aggregate and with accrued
interest, total $946,637.45.  Attached to this letter are copies of the Note and
the  documentation  of the Advances.  You tendered to UDC Acquisition  Corp. the
Purchased  Stock on or before  January 16, 2002 in  connection  with the Amended
Tender Offer of UDC  Acquisition  Corp.,  Ernie  Garcia,  Greg  Sullivan and UDC
Holdings.  Duck  agrees that you will  retain the  proceeds  paid to you for the
Purchased  Stock.  On or prior to that date thirty (30) days after the Effective
Date,  in exchange for the payment to the Duck of $10,000,  Duck shall  transfer
and make the Note and the Advances  payable to a third party mutually  agreeable
to the Duck and Employee.

Except as otherwise set forth in the Severance Agreement and this letter,  there
are no other terms or conditions  applicable to your severance,  your employment
with the Duck,  your  termination  from employment from the Duck or the Note and
the Advances. As with the Severance Agreement, we advise you to seek the counsel
of  advisors of your  choosing as to the terms of this letter and the  Severance
Agreement.  In addition,  this letter is subject to the same 21 day review and 7
day  revocation  periods  as the  Severance  Agreement  and this  letter  is not
enforceable  for or against either of us until the seven day  revocation  period
has run and you have not revoked either this letter or the Severance Agreement.

<PAGE>




If this letter accurately  states your  understanding of your Agreement with the
Duck,  please  sign where  indicated  below.  We agree  that this  letter can be
executed in  counterparts  and each of us will accept  facsimile  signatures  as
originals.

Sincerely,



Jon D. Ehlinger,
UDC VP/General Counsel/Secretary


The foregoing is hereby acknowledged and agreed to:


-----------------------
Steve Darak
MICHIGAN STATE 

UNIVERSIT Y 

OFFICE OF THE 

VICE PRESIDENT FOR 

FINANCE AND 

-OPERATIONS-

;ri^ARTMENTOF 

:-ANSPORTATiON 

^'Kn'OPERAIiQNS 

n\l FEB ? i P I- SS 

Mark P. Haas 

Assistant Vice President 

for Business and 

Chief Financial Officer 

Michigan State Unrveisity 

A12 Administration Building 

East (arising, Michigan 

48824-1046 

Phone 517.355.5014 

Fax 517 353.6772 

www.vpfo.msu edu 

February 7, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation. 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.. 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 

Washington. DC 20590 

Ref: Sun Countr>' Slot Exemption - Docket Number FAA-2012-0089 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Sun Country Airlines has requested an exemption from the slot limit for Ronald 

Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) set forth in § 93.123(a), to permit 

the FAA to create air carrier slots during certain limited hours for Sun Country's 

use. The proposed air carrier slots would replace two slot exemptions under 

DOT Order 2010-12-16 awarded to Sun Country. 

This request for exemption is necessary as a result of the recent decision of the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Republic Airlines, 

Inc. V. United States Department of Transportation; No. 11-1018 dated January 

6, 2012. The Court vacated DOT Order No. 2010-12-16, and thereby ordered the 

return of two DCA slots to Republic Airlines. It is important to note that Sun 

Country was not a party to the Republic Airlines. Inc., case, and the Court's 

decision was not related in any way to Sun Country's performance under the 

High Density Rule. In order to return the two slots to Republic, and ensure thai 

Sun Country can continue to provide the existing beneficial ser\'ice from 

-Lansing-to-DCA, additional slots must be authorized through this exemption 

proceeding. Specifically, Sun Country requests one daily slot during each of the 

1000 and 1 j 00 hours, so as to continue its current service patlem in the LAN -

DCA market. 

The Sun Country DCA service is essential to the economic growth of the Greater 

Lansing Region. The daily service is the only large aircraft (737-800) service to 

Washington Reagan Airport, in the state of Michigan outside of Detroit. Prior to 

Sun Country, the regional community had requested the introduction of this 

service from numerous other airline operators without success. Accordingly, it 

is critical that the FAA take the necessary steps to ensure the continuation of the 

Sun Countr>' slots at the established flight limes in support of Greater Lansing's 

business and economic growth. 

MSU IS in dtrirmitiv^ action. 

equal-opportuniiy employer. 
MICHIGAN STATE 

UNIVERSIT Y 

Your immediate approval of this exemption, so that Sun Country can begin to 

enter flights schedules for sale for the balance of 2012, will be greatly 

appreciated. 

Sincerely, 

Mark P. Haas 

Assistant Vice President for Business and Chief Financial Officer 

Michigan State University • 

cc: M. Bumham
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
American General Hospitality Corporation on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-33007 and
333-36127) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-08845, 333-08841 and 333-45329) as
amended of our report dated January 26, 1998, except for Note 11, as to which
the date is March 16, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of American General Hospitality
Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the year ended December
31, 1997 and the period from July 31, 1996 (inception of operations) through
December 31, 1996, and our report dated January 30, 1998, except for Note 6, as
to which the date is March 16, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of AGH Leasing, L.P. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the
year ended December 31, 1997 and the period from July 31, 1996 (inception of
operations) through December 31, 1996, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A.     

    
                                       /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.     


Dallas, Texas
        
June 18, 1998
NEWS RELEASE
  CONTACTS:
    
    Edward M. Jamison
    
    702. 878.0700Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive OfficerPatrick Hartman
    
    702. 947.3514Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 COMMUNITY BANCORP TO PRESENT AT SMALL & MID-CAP BANK AND INSURANCE CONFERENCE
 CBON www.community-bancorp.com
 About Community Bancorp
  www.community-bancorp.com
 Member FDIC, Equal Housing Lender, SBA Preferred Lender
OSCAR GLENN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3820

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 9, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney 

General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Oscar Glenn appeals an order revoking his probation. He argues among other 

things that the trial court erred by not providing written reasons for its finding that 

he poses a danger to the community under section 948.06(8)(e), Florida Statutes. 
2

The trial court orally made the statutorily required factual findings, so we affirm the 

revocation of probation. But we remand for correction of the trial court’s written 

order, so that it can be conformed to the trial court’s oral pronouncement.

In 2014, Appellant pled guilty to one count of sale of cocaine within 1,000 

feet of a place of worship and two counts of solicitation to commit witness 

tampering. He was sentenced to probation. In March, 2016, the State filed an 

affidavit alleging that Appellant violated the terms of his probation. The trial court 

conducted a hearing and revoked his probation. At the sentencing hearing, the trial 

court revoked Appellant’s probation and sentenced him to 133.8 months in prison 

on the first count, and five years in prison on the other two counts, to run concurrent 

with the sentence for count one. Although the trial court orally stated several reasons 

for its decision to revoke Appellant’s probation, it did not reduce any of them to 

writing. This appeal followed.

Section 948.06(8)(e)1, Florida Statutes, requires that a trial court make 

written findings regarding whether a violent felony offender of special concern poses 

a danger to the community. Because here the trial court articulated several reasons 

that satisfy the statute, we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation. But 

because the trial court did not reduce its reasons to writing, we reverse and remand 

with instructions that the trial court enter a written order that conforms to its oral 

pronouncements. See Arnone v. State, 204 So. 3d 556, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016); 
3

Bell v. State, 150 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); Martin v. State, 87 So. 3d 813 

(Fla. 2d DCA 2012). We also affirm with respect to Appellant’s second, sentencing 

scoresheet-related argument.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated March 24, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Bikers Dream, Inc. on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1996. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of
Bikers Dream, Inc. on Form S-8.

/s/ SINGER, LEWAK, GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN, LLP
----------------------------------------------
    SINGER, LEWAK, GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN, LLP


Los Angeles, California
May 7, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 290 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 19
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 290

 Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any constitutional 
                 amendment requiring a balanced budget.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 26 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

   Mr. Kempthorne (for Mr. Dole) (for himself, Mr. Thompson, and Mr. 
Inhofe) introduced the following bill which was read for the first time

                            January 30, 1995

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any constitutional 
                 amendment requiring a balanced budget.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That, for the purpose 
of any constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget, the 
appropriate committees of the House and the Senate shall report to 
their respective Houses implementing legislation to achieve a balance 
budget without increasing the receipts or reducing the disbursements of 
the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and the Federal 
Disability Insurance Trust Fund to achieve that goal.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 19

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 290

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 Relating to the treatment of Social Security under any constitutional 
                 amendment requiring a balanced budget.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 30, 1995

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```