Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 2024 / Notices 4903 

1See Polyester Textured Yarn from India and the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Antidumping Duty Determination for India and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 85 FR 1298 (January 10, 

2020) (Order). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 88 FR 45 (January 3, 2023). 

3See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

15642, 15649 (March 14, 2023). We have 

preliminarily determined that Reliance and its 

affiliate, Alok Industries Limited (AIL), should be 

collapsed and treated as a single entity, Reliance/ 

AIL. See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum 

for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Polyester Textured Yarn 

from India; 2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum), at the section entitled, 

‘‘Affiliation and Single Entity Treatment.’’ 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, dated September 11, 2023. 

5See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the EAR except directly 

related to safety of flight and authorized 

by BIS pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations, or engaging in any 

other activity subject to the EAR except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the EAR, or from any 

other activity subject to the EAR except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations. 

Second, that no person may, directly 

or indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of EMTRASUR 

any item subject to the EAR except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

EMTRASUR of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been or will 

be exported from the United States, 

including financing or other support 

activities related to a transaction 

whereby EMTRASUR acquires or 

attempts to acquire such ownership, 

possession or control except directly 

related to safety of flight and authorized 

by BIS pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from EMTRASUR of any 

item subject to the EAR that has been 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; 

D. Obtain from EMTRASUR in the 

United States any item subject to the 

EAR with knowledge or reason to know 

that the item will be, or is intended to 

be, exported from the United States 

except directly related to safety of flight 

and authorized by BIS pursuant to 

section 764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by EMTRASUR, 

or service any item, of whatever origin, 

that is owned, possessed or controlled 

by EMTRASUR if such service involves 

the use of any item subject to the EAR 

that has been or will be exported from 

the United States except directly related 

to safety of flight and authorized by BIS 

pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of the 

Regulations. For purposes of this 

paragraph, servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification, or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to EMTRASUR by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

sections 766.24(e) of the EAR, 

EMTRASUR may, at any time, appeal 

this Order by filing a full written 

statement in support of the appeal with 

the Office of the Administrative Law 

Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing 

Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21202–4022. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request not later than 20 days 

before the expiration date. A renewal 

request may be opposed by EMTRASUR 

as provided in section 766.24(d), by 

filing a written submission with the 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Export Enforcement, which must be 

received not later than seven days 

before the expiration date of the Order. 

A copy of this Order shall be provided 

to EMTRASUR and shall be published 

in the Federal Register. 

This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect for 180 days. 

Dated: January 21, 2024. 

Matthew S. Axelrod, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2024–01411 Filed 1–24–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–885] 

Polyester Textured Yarn From India: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that polyester textured yarn 

(yarn) from India was not sold in the 

United States at less than normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR) 

January 1, 2022, through December 31, 

2022. We invite interested parties to 

comment on these preliminary results of 

review. 

DATES: Applicable January 25, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samantha Kinney, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2285. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 10, 2020, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

polyester textured yarn from India.1 On 

January 3, 2023, Commerce published in 

the Federal Register a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the Order.2 On March 14, 

2023, based on a timely request for 

review, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an 

AD administrative review of the Order, 

covering one producer/exporter, 

Reliance Industries Limited (Reliance).3

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

on September 11, 2023, Commerce 

extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results of this review until 

January 31, 2024.4 For a complete 

description of the events that followed 

the initiation of this review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is polyester textured yarn from 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
4904 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 2024 / Notices 

6See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(c); see also 19 CFR 351.303 

(for general filing requirements). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Service Final Rule). 

9See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

10We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

11See APO and Service Final Rule, 88 FR at 

67069. 

12See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

13See 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

14See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

15 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2). 

16See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

17See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

18See Order, 85 FR at 1300. 

19For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

India. For a complete description of the 

scope of the Order, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Act. Export 

price is calculated in accordance with 

section 772 of the Act. Normal value is 

calculated in accordance with section 

773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying these 

preliminary results, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.trade.

gov. In addition, a complete version of 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

can be accessed directly at https://

access.trade.gov/public/FRNotices

ListLayout.aspx. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margin exists for the period 

January 1, 2022, through December 31, 

2022: 

Exporter/producer 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Reliance Industries 

Limited; Alok Industries Limited.

0.00 (de minimis). 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations and analysis performed to 

interested parties for these preliminary 

results within five days of any public 

announcement or if there is no public 

announcement, within five days after 

the date of publication of this notice in 

the Federal Register.6 Interested parties 

may submit case briefs to Commerce no 

later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.7 Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed no later than 

five days after the deadline for filing 

case briefs.8 Interested parties who 

submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding must submit: (1) a table 

of contents listing each issue; and (2) a 

table of authorities.9

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their brief that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide at the beginning of their briefs 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.10 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that will 

accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).11

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

participants; and (3) a list of issues to be 

discussed. Issues raised in the hearing 

will be limited to those raised in the 

respective case briefs. An electronically 

filed hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. If a request 

for a hearing is made, Commerce 

intends to hold a hearing at a time and 

date to be determined.12 Parties should 

confirm the date, time and location of 

the hearing two days before the 

scheduled date. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, upon completion of the final results 

of this administrative review, Commerce 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise covered 

by this review.13 If the weighted-average 

dumping margin for Reliance/AIL is not 

zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent) in the final results of this 

review, Commerce intends to calculate 

an importer-specific ad valorem 

antidumping duty assessment rate based 

on the ratio of the total amount of 

dumping calculated for each importer’s 

examined sales to the total entered 

value of those sales, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).14 We intend to 

instruct CBP to assess antidumping 

duties on all appropriate entries covered 

by this review when the importerspecific assessment rate calculated in 

the final results of this review is above 

de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent). If the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Reliance/AIL or an importer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis in the final results of review, 

we intend to instruct CBP to liquidate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties.15 The final results of this 

administrative review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.16

Where we do not have entered values 

for all U.S. sales to a particular 

importer, we will calculate a per-unit 

assessment rate by aggregating the 

antidumping duties due for all U.S. 

sales to that importer and dividing this 

amount by the total quantity sold to that 

importer.17

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Reliance/ 

AIL for which it did not know that the 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we intend to instruct CBP 

to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 

all-others rate (i.e., 13.50) in the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation 18 if 

there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.19


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 17 / Thursday, January 25, 2024 / Notices 4905 

20See Order, 85 FR at 1300. 

21See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; see also 19 

CFR 351.213(h). 

1See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Certain Glass Wine 

Bottles from the People’s Republic of China, the 

United Mexican States, and Chile: Petitions for the 

Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duties,’’ dated December 29, 2023 (the Petition). 

The members of the U.S. Glass Producers Coalition 

are Ardagh Glass Inc. (Ardagh) and the United 

Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, 

Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers 

International Union (USW). 

2 Id. 

3See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Supplemental 

Questions,’’ dated January 3, 2024 (General Issues 

Questionnaire); see also Commerce’s Letter, 

‘‘Supplemental Questions,’’ dated January 3, 2024; 

and Memorandum, ‘‘Phone Call,’’ dated January 10, 

2024 (January 10 Memorandum); and 

Memorandum, ‘‘Phone Call,’’ dated January 11, 

2024. 

4See Petitioner’s Letters, ‘‘Response to 

Supplemental Questions Regarding Common Issues 

and Injury Petition Volume I of the Petitions,’’ 

dated January 8, 2024 (First General Issues 

Supplement); ‘‘Response to Supplemental 

Questions Regarding Volume III of the Petitions,’’ 

dated January 9, 2024; and ‘‘Response to Second 

Supplemental Scope Questions Regarding Common 

Issues and Injury Petition Volume I of the Petition,’’ 

dated January 12, 2024 (Second General Issues 

Supplement). 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review in the Federal 

Register. If a timely summons is filed at 

the U.S. Court of International Trade, 

the assessment instructions will direct 

CBP not to liquidate relevant entries 

until the time for parties to file a request 

for a statutory injunction has expired 

(i.e., within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rate for Reliance/AIL will be 

equal to the weighted-average dumping 

margin established in the final results of 

this administrative review, except if the 

rate is less than 0.50 percent, and, 

therefore, de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for merchandise exported by a 

company not covered in this review but 

covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific 

cash deposit rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, or a previous 

segment, but the producer is, then the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established in the completed segment 

for the most recent period for the 

producer of the merchandise; and (4) 

the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 13.50 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.20

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Final Results of Review 

Unless the deadline is otherwise 

extended, Commerce intends to issue 

the final results of this administrative 

review, including the results of its 

analysis of issues raised by interested 

parties in any case and rebuttal briefs, 

within 120 days after the date of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register.21

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of doubled 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: January 19, 2024. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Affiliation and Single Entity Treatment 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–01466 Filed 1–24–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–163] 

Certain Glass Wine Bottles From the 

People’s Republic of China: Initiation 

of Countervailing Duty Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Applicable January 18, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Preston Cox, Scarlet Jaldin, or Theodora 

Mattei, AD/CVD Operations 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5041, 

202–482–4275, or (202) 482–4834, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

The Petition 

On December 29, 2023, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (Commerce) 

received a countervailing duty (CVD) 

petition concerning imports of certain 

glass wine bottles (wine bottles) from 

the People’s Republic of China (China) 

filed in proper form on behalf of the 

U.S. Glass Producers Coalition (the 

petitioner).1 The CVD Petition was 

accompanied by antidumping duty (AD) 

petitions concerning imports of wine 

bottles from Chile, China, and Mexico.2

Between January 3 and 11, 2024, 

Commerce requested supplemental 

information pertaining to certain aspects 

of the Petition.3 The petitioner filed 

responses to the supplemental 

questionnaires between January 8 and 

12, 2024.4

In accordance with section 702(b)(1) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), the petitioner alleges that the 

Government of China (GOC) is 

providing countervailable subsidies, 

within the meaning of sections 701 and 

771(5) of the Act, to producers of wine 

bottles from China, and that such 

imports are materially injuring, or 

threatening material injury to, the 

domestic industry producing wine 

bottles in the United States. Consistent 

with section 702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.202(b), for the alleged 

programs on which we are initiating a 

CVD investigation, the Petition is 

supported by information reasonably 

available to the petitioner. 

Commerce finds that the petitioner 

filed the Petition on behalf of the 

domestic industry, because the 

petitioner is an interested party, as 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES