alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ROBERT LUNDBERG

,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, Secretary, Florida

Department of Corrections

,

Respondent

. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 249

Opinion filed November 2, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

– original jurisdiction.

Robert Lundberg, pro se , Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee;

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Sean W. Gellis, Assistant Attorney General,

Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

WOLF, THOMAS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated February 27, 2009, withrespect to i) the consolidated financial statements of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the year ended December 31, 2008, for the four months ended December 31, 2007, and for each of the twoyears in the period ended August 31, 2007; ii) Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008; iii) the consolidated balance sheet of Energy Transfer Partners GP, L.P. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2008; and iv) the consolidated balance sheet of Energy Transfer Partners, L.L.C. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, all included in the Annual Report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-147990, File No. 333-136429, and File No. 333-133176) and on Form S-8 (File No.333-146338). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Dallas, Texas

February 27, 2009
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       EXHIBIT 5


                                 LAW OFFICES OF
                      Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
       A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS

                              695 TOWN CENTER DRIVE
                        COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1924
                            TELEPHONE (714) 668-6200
                            FACSIMILE (714) 979-1921
                              INTERNET www.phjw.com




                                December 30, 1996


(714) 668-6200



SRS Labs, Inc.
2909 Daimler Street
Santa Ana, California 92705

          Re:     SRS Labs, Inc.
                  1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  We have acted as counsel for SRS Labs, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the SRS Labs, Inc. 1996
Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "1996 Plan"). We have examined such documents,
records, and matters of law as we have deemed necessary for purposes of this
opinion, and based thereupon we are of the opinion that the shares of the
Company's common stock, $.001 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), that may
be issued and sold pursuant to the 1996 Plan will be, when issued and sold in 
accordance with the 1996 Plan, duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and 
nonassessable.

                  We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5
to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed by the Company on or about
December 30, 1996, to effect registration of the shares of Common Stock to be
issued and sold pursuant to the 1996 Plan under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

                                       Very truly yours,



                                       /s/ Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                           |  |        |  |                                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | ------ |  | ---------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 11, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.
|                   |  |  |  |                           |  | Name:  |  | Willis H. Newton, Jr.                  
|                   |  |  |  |                           |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|                   |  |  |  |                           |  |        |  | and Treasurer
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 14

- 855 C

(File d: November 17, 2014 )

ADVANCED GOVERNMENT

SOLUTIONS, INC.

,

Plaintiff

,

v.

THE UNITED STATES,

Defendant. )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

O R D E R

The court is in receipt of defendan t ’ s notice of corrective action (ECF No

. 28),

plaintiff ’ s opposition thereto (ECF No. 29) , and defendant ’ s reply in support (ECF No.

30)

. This court now ORDERS that the relief defendant seeks shall be GRAN TED

. Consequently, the briefing schedule shall be suspended and the hearing on the parties ’

motion for judgment on the administrative record is cancelled. The parties shall file a

joint status report a dvising the court of the progress of the government ’ s corrective action

no later than January 12, 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nancy B. Firestone

NANCY B. FIRESTONE

Judge
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-Q
    November 20, 2008Date

By

/s/ Michael J. RispoliMichael
    J. Rispoli

Chief Financial Officer,
    Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC,
    the Manager of NNN 2003 Value Fund, LLC
    (principal financial officer)   Form 10-Q
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1875 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1875

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 1996

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse in Medford, Oregon, as the 
                ``James A. Redden Federal Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 310 West Sixth Street in Medford, 
Oregon, shall be known and designated as the ``James A. Redden Federal 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James A. Redden 
Federal Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate September 24, 1996.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an exhibit
          the Annual Servicing Report of Company's Independent
          Public Accountants. 


                  Commission File Nos. 0-20909


            REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1 
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Servicer of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Servicer's charter)


            DELAWARE                      Not Applicable         
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Servicer)        Number of Registrant


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070     
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Servicer)


Servicer's telephone number, including area code  (847) 564-5000 


























                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
amendment to be signed on behalf of the Revolving Home Equity Loan
Trust 1996-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Servicer of and on behalf of the

                       REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  April 29, 1997         By:/s/John W. Blenke              
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary
















U:\WP\HFS088\95-10K\RHEL96-1.AMD


<PAGE>
                                 




                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit                                      Page No.

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants          4
               Annual Servicing Report dated January 23,
               1997.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      /s/ Craig T. DavenportCraig T. DavenportPresident, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
#### In re Dovon BROWN, Petitioner.

No. 02-7857.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 13, 2003.

Dovon Brown, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Dovon Brown, a federal inmate, filed this petition for a writ of error seeking to have this court recall its mandate dismissing the appeal of the denial of his motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). *See United States v. Brown,*No. 00-7254, 2000 WL 1707272 (4th Cir. Nov. 15, 2000) (unpublished). In the alternative, Brown requests that this court allow him to file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). In his petition, Brown alleges that his conviction and sentence are unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s decision in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and this court’s cases applying *Apprendi.*Brown has failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances justifying recall of the mandate. *See Calderon v. Thompson,*523 U.S. 538, 549-50, 118 S.Ct. 1489, 140 L.Ed.2d 728 (1998). Moreover, we have held that *Apprendi*is not retroactively applicable in a § 2241 petition. *See San-Miguel v. Dove,*291 F.3d 257, 261 n. 2 (4th Cir.2002). Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Brown’s petition for writ of error. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Adam Mauerberger, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form  10-QSB/A of Atlantic  Wine
Agencies, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and have:

        a) designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure that
        material   information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
        consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others  within those
        entities,  particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
        is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
        and  procedures  as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
        this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c)  presented  in  this  quarterly  report  my  conclusions   about  the
        effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and  procedures  based on our
        evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

        a) all  significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
        controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified
        for the  registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal
        controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees  who  have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
        controls; and

<PAGE>

6. I have  indicated  in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were
significant  changes  in  internal  controls  or in  other  factors  that  could
significantly  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation,   including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Adam Mauerberger
----------------------
Name: Adam Mauerberger
Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1834 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1834

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To reauthorize the Indian Environmental General Assistance Program Act 
                    of 1992, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 502(h) of the Indian Environmental General Assistance 
Program Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4368b(h)) is amended by striking 
``$15,000,000'' and inserting ``such sums as may be necessary''.

            Passed the Senate August 2, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1834

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To reauthorize the Indian Environmental General Assistance Program Act 
                    of 1992, and for other purposes.
```
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K/A
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of the earliest event reported): December 31, 2008
 Valeant Pharmaceuticals International
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    1-11397
(Commission File Number)
    
    33-0628076
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 One Enterprise
Aliso Viejo, California 92656   (949) 461-6000   Not applicable
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.01. Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of AssetsItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEX-23.1EX-99.1EX-99.2EX-99.3    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.01. Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets.
  
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
       Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibit23.1
    
    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.99.1
    
    Audited consolidated financial statements of Dow Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.99.2
    
    Unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Dow
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc. as of September 30, 2008 and for
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.99.3
    
    Unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
 2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONALDate: February 27, 2009
    By:
    /s/ PETER J. BLOTTPeter J. BlottExecutive Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer 3




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibit23.1
    
    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.99.1
    
    Audited consolidated financial statements of Dow Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.99.2
    
    Unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Dow
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Inc. as of September 30, 2008 and for
the nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.99.3
    
    Unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements.
 4
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of instaCare Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Keith Berman  Keith Berman  Principal Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer  November 17, 2008
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6374

LEWIS D. RICKS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus S. K. YOUNG, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-480) Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 18, 2005 Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lewis D. Ricks, Appellant Pro Se. Deana A. Malek, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lewis D. Ricks seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ricks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.DISMISSED
SCPW-20-0000615

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

ROLAND I. KEHANO, SR., Petitioner,

vs.

CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI#I;

HAWAI#I PAROLING AUTHORITY, STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CAAP-20-0000587; CASE NO. 2PR191000002; CR. NO. 92-0560)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ.,

and Circuit Judge Morikawa, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of petitioner Roland I. Kehano,

Sr.’s “Objection/Reconsideration”, filed on November 23, 2020,

which this court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the

November 16, 2020 order denying the petition and motions, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 30, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Trish K. Morikawa

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-20-0000615

30-NOV-2020

10:29 AM

Dkt. 29 ODMR