alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September

**2~~0** 14 Memorandum Subject: September 25, 2014 Meeting Between the American Petroleum Institute (API), API Members and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) From: Chris Stoneman, Policy Advisor



# ~ **~** Outreach andJnformation Division, Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards (OAQPS) To: Docket- EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0151 This memorandum to docketprovides a briefsummary ofthe main discussion points made at the subject meeting for the Advance Notice ofProposed Rulemaking (ANPR): "Managing Emissions from Oil and Natural Gas Production in Indian Country," (79 Federal Register 32502, June 5, 2104); and proposed rulemaking: "General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Federal Minor New Source Review Program in Indian Country," (79 Federal Register 41846, July 17, 2014). Meeting details: When: September 25, 2014; 1:00-3:30p.m. ET Where: EPA Offices, RTP, NC Participants: Bruce Moore, U.S. EPA, OAQPS Cheryl Vetter, U.S. EPA, OAQPS Chris Stoneman, U.S. EPA, OAQPS Claudia Smith, U.S. EPA, Region 8 Dee Rothery, U.S. EPA, Region 8 Greg Green, U.S. EPA, OAQPS Greg Nizich, U.S. EPA, OAQPS Lourdes Morales, U.S. EPA, OAQPS Amanda San Miguel, Marathon Oil Angela Zickovich, Anadarko Becky Keogh, BHP Billitort Petroleum Bill Wehrum, Hunton & Williams Bob King, WPX Grover Campbell, DevonEnergy James Ashe, Enterprise Products Jeffrey Adams, BP Jenny Yang, Conoco Phillips Jim Sewell, Shell John McMichael, XTO Kenyatta Miles, Shell Matthew Todd, API NicaHoshija, WPX Shankar Ananthakrishna, Chevron Tom Monahan, XTO UrsulaRick, WEA The EPA met with API and its members at the energy organization's request. During the meeting, API presented its comments onthe two subject EPA actions in the following areas:

• Existing oil and natural gas sources;

### -. PrOvis1 ns n1 otninCI. 

### n - atural ga -s:perrnits fcH'nonattaiffmef 'lTareas; - • Permitting method; • Permit issuance; • Range ofpermit content issues; • Revisions to the scope ofoperations covered bythe oil and gas production segmentpermitting mechanism; • Reconsidering all ofthe potentially relevant emissionpoints ofthe oil and gas production segment; • Covering all relevantpollutants inthe permitting mechanism; • Conduct ofany needed ambient air quality monitoring itself; • Requirement for thirdparty compliance verification; • Establishment ofautomatic penalties; and • Requirements for engines used inthe oil and natural gas sector. The EPA answered basic questions about the content ofthe ANPR and offered to be available for further discussions and/or exchanges oftechnical information. This memorandum will be filed inthe docket for the above actions and will be available for public review.
Exhibit 11
                            THERMO OPTEK CORPORATION

                        Computation of Earnings per Share

                                             1996          1995          1994
   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Computation of Primary Earnings
     per Share

   Net Income (a)                     $23,401,000   $16,009,000   $14,423,000
                                      -----------   -----------   -----------
   Shares:
     Weighted average shares
       outstanding                     46,904,670    45,000,000    45,000,000
     Add: Shares issuable from assumed
          exercise of options (as
          determined by the
          application of the
          treasury stock method)           39,260       157,040       157,040
                                      -----------   -----------   -----------
   Weighted average
     shares outstanding,
     as adjusted (b)                   46,943,930    45,157,040    45,157,040
                                      -----------   -----------   -----------
   Primary Earnings per Share
     (a) / (b)                        $       .50   $       .35   $       .32
                                      ===========   ===========   ===========
#### Dodd HAYES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28112.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 29, 1956.

No attorney for appellant of record on appeal.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The offense is selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, 30 days in jail.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular and nothing is presented for review. The judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1770 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1770

                  For the relief of Wayne T. Alderson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 1996

Mr. Santorum (for himself, Mr. Specter, Mr. Dole, Mr. Craig, Mr. Helms, 
 and Mr. Thurmond) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
            and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                  For the relief of Wayne T. Alderson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.

    The time limitations set forth in section 3744(b) of title 10, 
United States Code, shall not apply with respect to the awarding of the 
medal of honor to Wayne T. Alderson of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 
recognition of acts performed at the risk of his life and beyond the 
call of duty while serving as a private first class in the United 
States Army in Germany during World War II.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.25


 


SECOND AMENDMENT


 


to the


 


AMENDED AND RESTATED


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


Richard S. Swartz, Jr.


 


This SECOND AMENDMENT,
dated as of January 1, 2017, to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) is by and between
MYR Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Richard S. Swartz, Jr., (the “Key
Employee”) (capitalized terms used in this Amendment that are not defined herein shall have the meanings given them in
the Agreement, unless the context clearly requires otherwise).


 


WHEREAS, on
January 1, 2017, the Company’s Board of Director’s appointment of Key Employee to the position of President and Chief
Executive Officer became effective; and


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and Key Employee desire to amended the Agreement to be consistent with this appointment.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


Paragraph 2.2 of the
Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


2.2           Position,
Duties and Services. The Key Employee shall serve in the position of President and Chief Executive Officer and shall
have duties and responsibilities consistent with an executive serving in such capacity. The Key Employee shall perform such duties
and responsibilities diligently and to the best of the Key Employee’s abilities. The Key Employee’s employment will
be subject to the supervision and direction of the Board of Directors.


 


Paragraph 2.3 (a) of
the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


2.3           (a)          Base
Salary. Beginning on the date of this Second Amendment the Key Employee shall receive a Base Salary at the rate of Five Hundred
and Sixty-five Thousand dollars ($565,000) per annum payable in periodic installments in accordance with the Company’s normal
payroll practices and procedures, which Base Salary may be increased (but not decreased) by the Board or (a committee thereof)
from time to time.


 


INTENDING TO BE
BOUND, the parties hereto have executed this AMENDMENT as of the date first set forth above.


 





	 	COMPANY:
	 	MYR GROUP INC.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ LARRY F. ALTENBAUMER
	 	Name:	Larry F. Altenbaumer
	 	Title:	Compensation Committee Chairman
	 	 
	 	KEY EMPLOYEE:
	 	 
	 	/s/ RICHARD S. SWARTZ, JR.
	 	Name	Richard S. Swartz, Jr.
Border 2012

U.S. – Mexico Environmental 

Program

“To protect public health and the environment 

in the U.S.-Mexico border region, consistent 

with the principles of sustainable 

development.”
U.S.-Mexico Border Region
Population Growth on the Border

 2000 Population: 11.8 million

 2020 Population: 24 million

 50% of Border Population Reside 

in sister cities

 Population growth linked to 

industrial growth of maquíladoras
Border Environmental Challenges

Water Quality

Lack of sufficient water and waste water infrastructure 

threaten drinking water supplies and degrade watersheds

Air Quality

Increasing vehicle and industrial emissions threaten air 

quality in bi-national air sheds

Waste Management

Improper management of hazardous and solid wastes 

threaten exposure to toxins and heavy metals

Public Health

Incidence rates of Infectious and non-communicable 

diseases are above US averages
Border 2012

 Measurable results

 Bottom-up approach

 Emphasis on Partnerships

•10 Border States

•26 U.S. Tribes

• Local Governments 

• Industry

• SEMARNAT

• US EPA

• Border Environment Cooperation 

Commission (BECC)

• North American Development Bank 

(NADB) 
Border 2012 Goals

Goal 1

Reduce Water Contamination

Goal 2

Reduce Air Pollution

Goal 3

Reduce Land Contamination

Goal 4

Reduce Pesticide Exposure

Goal 5

Reduce Exposure 

to Accidental Releases

Goal 6

Promote Environmental 

Stewardship
2008 Accomplishments

 Water

 5,162 additional homes were served with safe drinking 

water.

 31,686 homes were served with sewer systems.

 Air

 92 diesel retrofits have been performed through diesel 

oxidation catalysts (DOCs).

 Waste

 14.5 tons of e-waste has been collected for recycling.

 681,650 scrap tires have been removed from tire piles.

 Emergency Preparedness and Response

 6 training exercises in emergency response were 

demonstrated.

 174 first responders were trained and received 

certification.
2009 -2010 Priorities

 Increasing access to drinking water and wastewater infrastructure

 Building greenhouse (GHG) information capacity and expanding voluntary 

programs for reduction of GHG emissions

 Developing institutional capacity to manage immerging wastes, including 

e-waste and used oil

 Piloting projects that reduce exposure to obsolete agricultural pesticides

 Conducting Sister City bi-national emergency preparedness training and 

exercises

 Use the Toxics Release Inventory and Pollutant Release and Transfer 

Register tools to collect and report on industry pollutant releases; better 

assist border industry to exceed compliance standards
Ongoing Work

 Coordination and implementation of new objectives, 

under the Border 2012 Mid-Course Refinement 

Document

 Response to the Inspector General’s evaluation

 Planning 2009 NCM (Fall)

 Strategic Planning of a future program- beyond 2012
Lisa Almódovar

Senior Program Advisor 

Border 2012

EPA – Office of International 

Affairs 

almodovar.lisa@epa.gov

www.epa.gov/usmexicoborder
Exhibit 23CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No.333-136394) of Southern California Edison Company of our report dated February 27, 2008 relating tothe financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporatedin this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of ourreport dated February 27, 2008 relating to the financial statement schedules, which appears in thisForm 10-K./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4850 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to alter the deadlines by 

which an application for asylum must be made, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2018 

Mr. FRANCIS ROONEY of Florida (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Texas, Mr. 

BROOKS of Alabama, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. BUDD, 

and Mr. NORMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to alter 

the deadlines by which an application for asylum must 

be made, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Asylum Protection Act 

5 of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DATES OF APPLICATIONS FOR ASYLUM. 

7 Section 208(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act (8 U.S.C. 1158(a)(2)) is amended— 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4850 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘1 year’’ and inserting ‘‘30 

2 days’’; and 

3 (2) by adding before the period at the end the 

4 following: ‘‘, except that, in the case of an alien who 

5 arrives at a designated port of arrival, that alien 

6 shall be required to commence an application at the 

7 time of arrival’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officerof McKenzie Bay International, Ltd.  (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company  for  the  quarter ended  March 31, 2006  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 18, 2006

/s/ Gregory N. Bakeman

----------------------

Gregory N. Bakeman

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William D. Green, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture plc, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 25, 2010



/s/ William D. GreenWilliam D. GreenChief Executive Officer of Accenture plc,
general partner of Accenture SCA (principal
executive officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      /s/ Michael R. RodriguezMichael R. RodriguezSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bette
J. Floray, interim Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Bette J. Floray
----------------------------------
Bette J. Floray
Interim Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7462

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TIMOTHY MAURICE TYSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cr-00371-TDS-1)

Submitted: July 22, 2021 Decided: August 11, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Maurice Tyson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Maurice Tyson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion 

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon review of the record, 

we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See

United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Tyson, No. 1:16-cr00371-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
3 American Airline Petition for Extension to Exemption (FAR 121.619)

Docket FAA-2010-0055 

Attachment 

November 4, 2015

SUMMARY OF AMERICAN AIRLINES PETITION 

Petitioner: American Airlines, Inc. (AAL) 

Regulations Affected: 14 CFR 121.619 

Description of Relief Sought: American Airlines requests an extension of Exemption No. 

10,000 (Docket No. FAA-2010-0055), which is due to expire on January 31, 2016. This 

exemption provides relief from 14 CFR 121.619 by allowing American Airlines to dispatch 

aircraft to domestic airports without designating an alternate for the destination airport 

where for at least 1 hour before and 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival at the 

destination airport the appropriate weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, 

indicate the ceiling will be at least 1,000 feet above the airport elevation and visibility will be 

at least 3 statute miles for airports utilizing Category CAT I ILS authorizations or the visibility 

will be at least 2 statute miles for airports utilizing CAT II or CAT III ILS authorizations.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7838** 

ROBERT LEWIS JORDAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v.
MICHAEL B. HARDIN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 5:13

- hc

- 02196

- F )

Submitted : April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Robert Lewis Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Robert Lewis Jordan seeks to a ppeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction
because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the
district court’s final j udgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely
filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on
March 18, 2014 . The notice of appeal was filed on December 1 0 ,
2014

. * Because Jordan failed to file a timely notice of appeal
or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.26







THIRD AMENDMENT OF
 FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 WITH ROY C. THYGESEN


This THIRD AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of December 17, 2016 (the "Effective Date"), by and among FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. ("FCFP"), FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL BANK (the "Bank," and together with FCFP, the "Employer"), and ROY C. THYGESEN ("Executive," and together with the Employer, the "Parties").


RECITALS


A.The Parties have made and entered into that certain Employment Agreement, effective March 12, 2013 (the "Agreement") and as amended as of December 18, 2014 and as of January 1, 2016.


B.Pursuant to Section 18 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by written agreement signed by the Parties.


C.The Parties desire to adjust the Severance Amount as defined in the Agreement.


AGREEMENT


In consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants of the Parties set forth in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby expressly agree as follows:


1.The following Section 21(rr) of the Agreement which states “Severance Amount means an amount equal to 100% of Executive’s Base Compensation as of the respective Termination” is replaced in its entirety with “Severance Amount means an amount equal to 200% of Executive’s Base Compensation as of the respective Termination”.


2.The amount of Annual Base Salary in Section 3(a) of the Agreement and as modified in the Second Amendment, is hereby modified to $450,000.  All other provisions of Section 3(a) remain unchanged.


		
	3.
	In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.










[Signature page follows.]






Exhibit 10.26





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of FCFP and the Bank has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf, and Executive acknowledges understanding and acceptance of, and agrees to, the terms of this Amendment, all as of the Effective Date.


    
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
By: /s/George Barr    
Print Name:         George Barr                
Title:         Chairman of the Board of Directors        
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL BANK
By: /s/George Barr    
Print Name:         George Barr                
Title:         Chairman of the Board of Directors        
ROY C. THYGESEN 
/s/Roy C. Thygesen