alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 31, 2014 

Testimony on# EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602 

John Joseph Dziak, Ph.D. 

110 East Foster Avenue, Apt. 314 

State College, PA 16801 

dziakj 1@grnail.com 

Hello, I'm Dr. John Dziak. I am a statistician helping with social science research at Penn State. I am 

here to express my personal support for the EPA's proposed carbon emission limitations. 

Last year I had the amazing opportunity to visit my dear, beautiful sponsored children Fridah and 

Emily and their families, in their village Marimanti in the Tharaka District of Kenya. Tharaka is a hot, 

dry land, almost desert, with a few people and their goats and chickens, and thorny plants. But the 

people were mostly kind and good. One dirt-poor farmer offered a beautiful goat as a present for his 

visitors, and I had to apologize for being unable to take it. In recent years Tharaka has been 

experiencing unusually severe droughts in which people were going hungry because could not grow 

enough food. Scientists predict that climate change will make Africa even hotter and more vulnerable 

to deadly droughts. I felt bad that if we do not change, we will hurt their land and people. I spoke about 

this with a holy priest who helps look after the children. He said he was also worried about climate 

change but that I should not feel too bad because I would do something if I could. This is my small 

attempt not to let them down. 

I am also worried about the beautiful wildlife such as rhinoceros and giraffe which I saw on that trip. In 

past times, wildlife could sometimes adapt to weather changes by moving to more fertile areas. But 

now there are human cities, farms and roads in their way, and both humans and animals will 

increasingly suffer from conflict. 

As Americans, we really want to make the world better, not worse. Making the way we produce our 

energy cleaner will be a big help towards this. 

Thank you very much!
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 6563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2791]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Public Availability of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 
(EEOC) FY 2011 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public availability of FY 2011 Service Contract 
inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission is publishing this notice to advise 
the public of the availability of the FY 2011 Service Contract 
inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2011. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management 
and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's 
guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has posted 
its inventory and a summary of the inventory on the EEOC homepage at 
the following link: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/doingbusiness/index.cfm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding the service 
contract inventory should be directed to Doreen Starkes in the 
Acquisition Services Division at (202) 663-4240 or 
DOREEN.STARKES@EEOC.GOV.

    Dated: February 2, 2012.
Patrick R. Mealy,
Director, Acquisition Services Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-2791 Filed 2-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2080 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2080

To save taxpayer money by reducing the unnecessary increase in Pentagon 
                     spending in fiscal year 1997.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 1996

  Mr. Harkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To save taxpayer money by reducing the unnecessary increase in Pentagon 
                     spending in fiscal year 1997.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF UNNECESSARY INCREASE IN PENTAGON SPENDING.

    (a) Limitation.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
total amount authorized to be appropriated by the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1997 may not exceed the amount 
requested by the President for fiscal year 1997 for the national 
security activities of the Department of Defense and the Department of 
Energy in the budget submitted to Congress by the President for that 
fiscal year under section 1105 of title 31, United States Code.
    (b) Allocation of Reductions.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
allocate reductions in authorizations of appropriations that are 
necessary as a result of the application of the limitation set forth in 
subsection (a) so as not to jeopardize the military readiness of the 
Armed Forces or the quality of life of Armed Forces personnel.
    (c) Excess Authorizations To Be Used for Deficit Reduction.--The 
reduction under subsection (a) of the total amount that, except for 
that subsection, would otherwise be authorized to be appropriated for 
fiscal year 1997 by the Act referred to in that subsection shall be 
applied to reduce the budget deficit for fiscal year 1997.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-24047, Form S-8 No. 333-57799, Form S-8 No. 333-44416 and Form S-8 No. 333-99511) pertaining to the Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, (FormS-8 No. 333-103318) pertaining to outstanding nonqualified stock options issued to nonemployee directors and (Form 333-127452) pertaining to the Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan of our reports dated June 12, 2006,with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc., Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006. 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

Los Angeles, California 

June 12, 2006
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Mark R. Richards, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Appleton Papers Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The
registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 15, 2007



|           |  |                                                
|---------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|Signature: |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                           
|           |  | Mark R. Richards                               
|           |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EvergreenBancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Gordon D. Browning

Gordon D. BrowningExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### T. J. FORMAN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee (2 cases). Noel Denton MARSALIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. Sam E. SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. Cleo Lane THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. Dillard WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. Robert MENDOZA, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. Henderson CROCKETT, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Texas. Charlie J. BURFORD, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. Bill BONNER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Nos. 35696-35698, 35701, 35708-35713.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 24, 1963.

Clyde E. Thomas, Sr., Big Spring, for Sam E. Smith.

George T. Thomas and Roger D. Brown, Big Spring, for other appellants.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

*945WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal to the County Court, which was sustained, alleged as the first two grounds: (1) that the sureties did not personally sign the bond and (2) that the principal to the bond did not personally sign it.

In the absence of any showing in the record that these allegations were not true, this Court must presume that the trial court’s ruling that such bonds were invalid was correct.

For the same reasons and upon the same authorities, and subject to the same conditions stated in Minchew v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 366 S.W.2d 942, the judgment in each of the above causes dismissing the appeal to the County Court is affirmed.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 304

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the transportation

fuels tax applicable to commercial aviation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 31 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself, Mr. BRYAN, Mr. GORTON, and Ms. MOSELEYBRAUN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal

the transportation fuels tax applicable to commercial

aviation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commercial Aviation

5 Fuel Tax Repeal Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF COMMERCIAL AVIATION FUEL TAX.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4092(b) of the Internal

8 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to no exemption from cer9 tain taxes on fuel used in commercial aviation) is amended
2

•S 304 IS

1 by striking ‘‘attributable to’’ and all that follows to the

2 end and inserting ‘‘attributable to the Leaking Under3 ground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate imposed

4 by such section. For purposes of the preceding sentence,

5 the term ‘commercial aviation’ means any use of an air6 craft other than in noncommercial aviation (as defined in

7 section 4041(c)(4)).’’

8 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 6427(l)(4)

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to no re10 fund of certain taxes on fuel used in commercial aviation)

11 is amended by striking ‘‘attributable to’’ and all that fol12 lows to the end and inserting ‘‘attributable to the Leaking

13 Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund financing rate

14 imposed by such section.’’

15 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

16 this section shall take effect on October 1, 1995.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brenda Hall (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brenda Hall, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Brenda Hall
-----------------------------
Brenda Hall
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2004
Exhibit 31.1

     Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Edward G. Newman, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report of Xybernaut Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
     being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

April 26, 2004

XYBERNAUT CORPORATION


By: /s/ EDWARD G. NEWMAN
------------------------
Edward G. Newman
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

OLGA ROGERS a/k/a OLGA L. ROGERS , Appellant,

v.

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
BENEFIT OF PEOPLE'S FINANCIAL REALTY MORTGAGE SECURITIES TRUST, SERIES 2006

- 1, MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006

- 1, MARTIN'S CROSSING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., and FIA CARD SERVICES,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION SUCESSOR BY MERGER OF BANK OF AMERICA, NA (USA)
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 15

- 3975

[ July 6, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Cir cuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; F. Shields McManus , Judge; L.T. Case No.

432013CA000902CAAX

.

Malcolm E. Harrison of the Law Office of Malcolm E. Harrison, P.A., Wellington, for appellant.

Diana B. Matson of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee HSBC Bank.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

T

AYLOR
, M AY and C ONNER
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Major COOK, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28332.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 23, 1956.

*514Theo Ash, Abilene, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the unlawful transportation of whisky in a dry area, with punishment assessed at a fine of $250.

Around 9:30 o’clock at night, a policeman of the city of Abilene saw appellant, at the beck and call of Henry Penns, drive his automobile to the street curb in front of a hotel, get out and, with a package under his arm, walk rapidly toward the hotel entrance. The officer called to appellant to stop, whereupon the latter started running to the door of the hotel. Upon reaching it, he threw the package to Penns, who fled with it up the stairs. The policeman pursued and overtook Penns and, from him, took the package, which contained six one-half pints of whisky.

Appellant objected to the testimony showing that the package contained whisky, as also to the introduction in evidence of the whisky, which he insisted was obtained as a result of his illegal arrest.

The action in overruling the objection presents the sole question for review.

Under the facts stated, appellant was never arrested or placed under arrest until after the whisky had been taken by the officer. All the officer did toward arresting appellant before such time was to call to him to stop — which appellant did not do. The package which he had in his possession was in full view of the officer. It took no arrest or search for him to be in position to identify the package taken from Penns as the same package he saw in appellant’s possession.

If any person was arrested, it was Penns. Appellant cannot complain of an arrest of Penns. Such was only Penns’ right and privilege. Hatfield v. State, 161 Tex.Cr.R.-, 276 S.W.2d 829.

The testimony was not subject to the objection urged.

The judgment is affirmed.