alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2126 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2126

To temporarily waive the enrollment composition rule under the medicaid 
         program for certain health maintenance organizations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 1996

 Mr. Graham (for himself and Mr. Mack) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To temporarily waive the enrollment composition rule under the medicaid 
         program for certain health maintenance organizations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF 75/25 MEDICAID ENROLLMENT RULE FOR CERTAIN MANAGED 
              CARE ORGANIZATIONS.

    The requirement of section 1903(m)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(m)(2)(A)(ii)) is waived with respect to facilities 
of HealthCare USA, Inc. and Ultramedix Health Care Systems Inc. 
operating in Florida for contract periods beginning on July 1, 1996, 
and ending on June 30, 1998.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 4.17

                         PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT


                       Between Registrant and Judy Suelzle




                                       
<PAGE>   2
                         PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

      This Agreement memorializes an Agreement between Helionetics, Inc., with
its place of business at 6849 Hayvenhurst Avenue, Van Nuys, California 91406
(herein referred to as "Client") and Judith S. Suelzle with his\their place of
business at 347 Costello Court Los Altos, CA 94024 (herein referred to as
"Employee\Consultant") as through August 1996. In consideration of the mutual
covenants contained herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which is acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree as follows:

      I.    QUALIFICATION: The Employee has special skill and and experience in
            certain fields of activity in which the Client is interested.

      II.   SERVICES RENDERED: Client engaged the nonexclusive services of
            Employee in 1995\1996 and Employee rendered substantial services to
            Client over the period Ended August 31, 1996.

      III.  COMPENSATION: The Client issued to Employee an amount of 1,213
            restricted shares of the Client's common stock, in payment in full
            for the aforesaid services rendered through August 31, 1996.

      IV.   ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This document represents the complete agreement
            between the parties and may be modified or amended only by executed
            written agreements. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance
            with the laws of the State of California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF: The parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of
the day and year noted above.

"Client"                                  "Consultant"
HELIONETICS, INC.



By:/s/ E. MAXWELL MALONE                       /s/ JUDITH S. SUELZLE
   ---------------------------           ----------------------------------
   E. Maxwell Malone                     Judith S. Suelzle
   Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1984 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1984

 To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 to require a 10 percent reduction in certain assistance to a State 
 under such title unless public safety officers who retire as a result 
 of injuries sustained in the line of duty continue to receive health 
                          insurance benefits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 1996

  Mr. Graham (for himself and Mr. Moynihan) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 to require a 10 percent reduction in certain assistance to a State 
 under such title unless public safety officers who retire as a result 
 of injuries sustained in the line of duty continue to receive health 
                          insurance benefits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as ``Alu-O'Hara Public Safety Officers 
Health Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS.

    Part L of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 1204A. PROTECTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS.

    ``A grant made under part Q of this title that would otherwise be 
made available to a State shall be reduced by 10 percent unless a 
public safety officer who is separated from service due to an injury 
suffered as the direct and proximate result of a personal injury 
sustained in the line of duty (during an emergency situation, or a hot 
pursuit as such terms are defined by State law) continues after such 
injury to receive the same or better level of health insurance benefits 
that are paid at the time of separation by the State or unit of local 
government within the State that employed such officer.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect beginning on 
October 1 of the first fiscal year beginning after the last day of the 
2-year period beginning on the date on the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21.1



Registrant had the following significant subsidiaries as of June 9, 2004:



|                                               |  |                          |  |                     |  
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------- | -
|Name                                           |  | State of Incorporation   |  | PercentageOwnership |  
|Keystone Automotive Industries MN, Inc.        |  | Minnesota                |  | 100                 | %
|Keystone Automotive Industries FL, Inc.        |  | Florida                  |  | 100                 | %
|Keystone Automotive Industries Resources, Inc. |  | Delaware                 |  | 100                 | %
|Keystone Automotive Industries TN, Inc.        |  | Tennessee                |  | (1                  | )
|Keystone Automotive Industries QC, Inc.        |  | Quebec, Canada           |  | 100                 | %
|Keystone Automotive Industries CDN, Inc.       |  | Ontario, Canada          |  | 100                 | %
|Keystone Automotive Industries ON, Inc.        |  | Ontario, Canada          |  | (2                  | )
|Keystone Automotive Industries BC, Inc.        |  | British Columbia, Canada |  | 100                 | %
|P-G Products, Inc.                             |  | Ohio                     |  | (3                  | )

---

|(1) | A wholly-owned subsidiary of Keystone Automotive Industries Resources, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | A wholly-owned subsidiary of Keystone Automotive Industries CDN, Inc.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

|(3) | A wholly-owned subsidiary of Keystone Automotive Industries TN, Inc.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
#### B. E. FREEMAN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 28299.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 2, 1956.

No appearance for appellant. ' •

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The conviction is for the offense of misapplication of public funds; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record on appeal contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. A1Í proceedings appear to be regular, and nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7646

LAWRENCE E. GRIFFIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-96-650)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence E. Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Griffin v. United States, No. CA-96-650 (E.D. Va.

Oct. 7, 1996). We deny Appellant's motions for a certificate of

probable cause, appointment of counsel, and release on bond pending

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; PAR-22-102 and PAR-22-103: Investigational New Drug (IND)-enabling and Early-Stage Development of Medications to Treat Alcohol Use Disorder and Alcohol-Associated Organ Damage.                    

*Date:*                         March 21, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Luis Espinoza, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Extramural Project Review Branch, Office of Extramural Activities, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 2109, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-8599,                         *espinozala@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 29, 2024.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-01998 Filed 1-31-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### Carl FLETCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marilyn BUTTS, RN; Stianche, MD, Defendants, Cubb, MD, Defendant-Appellee, Judy Hudson, RN, Defendant, Fred King, Dr., Defendant-Appellee, Dale Riley, Defendant, Robert Schoenen, Defendant-Appellee, Debbie Williams, Defendant, Linda Overstreet, LPN, Defendant-Appellee, Carl FLETCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marilyn BUTTS, RN; Stianche, MD, Defendants, Cubb, MD, Defendant-Appellee, Judy Hudson, RN, Defendant, Fred King, Dr., Defendant-Appellee, Dale Riley, Defendant, Robert Schoenen, Defendant-Appellee, Debbie Williams, Defendant, Linda Overstreet, LPN, Defendant-Appellee, Dick Moore, Defendant.

Nos. 93-1246, 93-1346.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 27, 1993.

Decided June 7, 1993.

*549Carl Fletcher, pro se.

Jeremiah, W. Nixon, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for defendant-appellee.

Before FAGG, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Carl Fletcher, a Missouri inmate, appeals from the district court’s1 order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Fletcher alleged defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious Achilles-tendon injury in violation *of the*Eighth Amendment.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo and examine the record in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. *United States ex rel. Glass v. Medtronic, Inc.,*957 F.2d 605, 607 (8th Cir.1992). We agree with the district court that Fletcher did not submit sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether defendants were more than negligent, if they were negligent at all. The record contains abundant unrebutted evidence that defendants treated Fletcher’s injury on the same day it occurred; they promptly responded to his continuing complaints of pain over seven months; and they prescribed corticosteroid medication and pain-killers consistent with conservative treatment. Dr. Robert Schoenen denied referrals to a specialist based on his professional opinion that tendinitis would respond to conservative treatment with time.

Fletcher also failed to submit sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether he needed immediate surgery after an orthopedist recommended exploratory surgery, and whether the one-month delay between the recommendation and surgery was unreasonable. The orthopedist did not state emergency surgery was necessary, and Fletcher did not dispute that defendants prescribed pain-killers for him in December and early January while he waited for surgery. Fletcher’s reliance on *DeGidio v. Pung,*920 F.2d 525, 529-33 (8th Cir.1990), is misplaced because the conduct at issue here was not sufficiently egregious to establish deliberate indifference. We reject as meritless Fletcher’s other arguments on appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Scott O. Wright, Senior United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and rccommendation of the Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
#### Morris Len GORDON, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 33387.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 10, 1961.

Irwin & Irwin, T. K. Irwin, Jr., and R. T. Scales, Dallas, for appellant.

*842Henry Wade, Crim. Dist. Atty., Paul French, John Rogers, Phil Burleson, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, and Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDonald, judge.

Adultery is the offense; the punishment, a fine of $600.

The state relied upon three acts of intercourse without a living together to constitute “habitual carnal intercourse,” within the meaning of Art. 499, Vernon’s Ann. P.C.

The only evidence of the commission of acts of intercourse on June 5 and June 8, 1960, is found in appellant’s confession.

In the absence of corroborating testimony, the confession is insufficient to sustain the judgment. Carroll v. State, 143 Tex.Cr.R., 158 S.W.2d 532; Robinson v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 439, 188 S.W.2d 182.

Because the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Exhibit 10.14


  





LEASE
ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Agreement, made
this 1st day of December, 2016, by and between CALX MINERALS, LLC (hereinafter called "Transferor"),
RMR INDUSTRIALS, INC. (hereinafter called "Transferee") and Komatsu Financial Limited Partnership (hereinafter
called "KF").


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, Transferor, as lessee, and KF,
as lessor, heretofore entered into lease contract 777-0140059-006, dated December 28th, 2015, covering
the following property (hereinafter collectively called the "Property"):


 


D155AX-6 S/N 81287 


which lease provides for the payment by
Transferor of aggregate rentals in the amount of $3,375.61, and further provides that Transferor shall not assign Transferor's
interest, as lessee, in said lease and Property, and there remains unpaid under said lease rentals in the amount of $128,273.18
payable in 38 rentals, commencing 10/28/16 and on the 28th of each month thereafter.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, Transferor, for and in
consideration of one dollar and other valuable consideration paid to Transferor by Transferee, hereby transfers and assigns to
Transferee all of Transferor's interest, as lessee under said lease, in and to the said lease and Property.


 


In consideration of KF's consent to said
transfer and assignment, Transferor and Transferee hereby promise jointly and severally to pay to KF the unpaid balance of the
rentals as above stated, and Transferee hereby assumes all of the obligations of Transferor under said lease as though Transferee
were the original lessee of the Property.


 


It is further agreed that Transferor is
in no way released from the obligations set forth in said lease but is still firmly bound, and Transferor consents that KF may,
without notice to Transferor and without releasing Transferor's liability, elect any remedy and compound or release any right against,
and grant extensions of time to, Transferee.


 


The Property is now at 1 TRANSFER TRAIL
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602, and will hereafter be kept at 9301 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 312, Beverly Hills, CA 90210
but shall not become part of the real estate.


 






    	 	 	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set
our hands the day and year first above written.


 


	CALX MINERALS, LLC	 	By: 	/s/ John Skadow	CFO
	Transferor	 	 	Title
	 	 	 	 
	1 TRANSFER TRAIL	 	 	 
	Glenwood Springs, CO 81602	 	 	 
	Address	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	RMR INDUSTRIALS, INC.	 	By: 	/s/ Michael Okada	CFO
	Transferee	 	 	Title
	 	 	 	 
	9301 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 312,	 	 	 
	Beverly Hills, CA 90210	 	 	 
	Address	 	 	 


 


Upon the express agreement that Transferor
remain liable on said lease and the Transferee assume the aforesaid obligations and that said lease is to remain in full force
and effect, KF hereby consents to the assignment by Transferor to Transferee of Transferor's interest in said lease and Property.


 


	 	KOMATSU FINANCIAL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ Nico Sich	Finance Representative
	 	 	Title
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1834

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Indian Environmental General Assistance

Program Act of 1992, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1834 ES

1 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION.

2 Section 502(h) of the Indian Environmental General

3 Assistance Program Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4368b(h)) is

4 amended by striking ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘such

5 sums as may be necessary’’.

Passed the Senate August 2, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1834

AN ACT

To reauthorize the Indian Environmental General

purposes.Assistance Program Act of 1992, and for other
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
I, William D. Green, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general partner of Accenture SCA(the “Registrant”), certify that:
1.  I have reviewed the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented inthis quarterly report; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
 b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Dated: April 8, 2005         /s/ William D. Green  William D. Green  Chief Executive Officer of AccentureLtd,General Partner of Accenture SCA