alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2066 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2066

To amend the Northern Great Plains Rural Development Act to extend the 
duration of the Northern Great Plains Rural Development Commission, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 1996

Mr. Daschle (for himself, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Exon, Mr. Kerrey, 
 Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Pressler, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. Harkin) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Northern Great Plains Rural Development Act to extend the 
duration of the Northern Great Plains Rural Development Commission, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS RURAL DEVELOPMENT 
              COMMISSION.

    Section 11 of the Northern Great Plains Rural Development Act 
(Public Law 103-318; 7 U.S.C. 2661 note) is amended by striking ``the 
earlier'' and all that follows through the period at the end and 
inserting ``September 30, 1997.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon D. Browning, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Gordon D. Browning                           
|Gordon D. Browning                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 19, 2009



- 44 -
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 257

AN ACT

To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars

to make eligible for membership those veterans that have

served within the territorial limits of South Korea.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 257 ES

1 That section 5 of the Act of May 28, 1936 (36 U.S.C.

2 115), is amended to read as follows:

3 ‘‘SEC. 5. A person may not be a member of the cor4 poration created by this Act unless that person—

5 ‘‘(1) served honorably as a member of the

6 Armed Forces of the United States in a foreign war,

7 insurrection, or expedition, which service has been

8 recognized as campaign-medal service and is gov9 erned by the authorization of the award of a cam10 paign badge by the Government of the United

11 States; or

12 ‘‘(2) while a member of the Armed Forces of

13 the United States, served honorably on the Korean

14 peninsula or in its territorial waters for not less than

15 30 consecutive days, or a total of 60 days, after

16 June 30, 1949.’’

Passed the Senate February 10 (legislative day,

January 30), 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 257

AN ACT

To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign

its of South Korea.erans that have served within the territorial limWars to make eligible for membership those vet-
1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 12

- 3991

_____________

ERNESTO GALARZA,

Appel lant

v.

MARK SZALCZYK; CITY OF ALLENTOWN;

LEHIGH COUNTY; GREG MARINO;

CHRISTIE CORREA

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(Civil Action No. 10

- cv

- 6815)

District Judge: Hon. James Knoll Gardner

_____________

Argued: October 10, 2013

Before: FUENTES, COWEN, and BARRY

, Circuit Judges

.

(Opinion Filed : March 4, 2014 )

___________

O R D E R

It is O R D E R E D that the Opinion entered on March 4, 2014 is amended to

correct a clerical error referred to parties represented by Andrew C. Nichols, Esq.

The March 4, 2014 , Opinion is amen ded as follows:

1. On page 3 of th e Court’s Opinion “ Attorney for Amicus Appellant2

National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild ” is corrected to read

“ Attorney for Amicus Appellants National Immigration Project of the National La wyers

Guild and National Immigra n t Justice Center .”

For the Court,

s/ Marcia M. Waldron

Clerk

Dated : March 26, 2014

SLC/cc: Counsel of Record
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned,the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (“Form 10-Q”),filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 4,2008

 

 
| /s/ Gresford Gray       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Gresford Gray           |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-4196

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Mario M. Martinez, Sr., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 15, 2007 Filed: January 22, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, BEAM, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Mario M. Martinez, Sr., pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. His written plea agreement contained a provisi on under which Martinez generally waived his right to appeal his conviction or sentence, reserving his right to seek habeas relief for ineffective assistance of counsel; and a separate specific waiver pursuant to which he agreed to have his sentence determin ed under the Sentencing Guidelines and to waive all constitutional challenges to thei r validity. On appeal, counsel moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that Martinez’s trial counsel had been ine ffective. We denied counsel’s motion and ordered supplemental briefing as to whether Martinez had waived his right to appeal1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chie f Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
-2- his sentence based on United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), in light of the district court’s 1 plea-hearing comment questioning the validity of the Guidelines waiver; and, if the issue was not waived , whether the court’s application of the Guidelines as mandatory warranted relief under Booker

. Upon reviewing the parties’ supplemental briefs, we dismiss the appeal based on the broad appeal waiver included in Martinez’s plea agreement. SeeUnited States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (e n banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where it falls w ithin scope of waiver, both plea agreement and waiver were entered in to knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result). The plea colloquy reflect s that Martinez understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the plea agreement, in cluding the broad waiver provision. This appeal – including any Bookerchallenge to the mandatory application of the Guidelines – falls within the scope of th e broad waiver, regard less of the separate Guidelines waiver which the distri ct court questioned. See, e.g. , United States v. Reeves , 410 F.3d 1031, 1034 (8th Cir.) (ri ght to appeal under Booker is among rights waived by broad appeal waiver even where parties did not anticipate Booker ruling), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 469 (2005). Finally, we conclude no injustice would result from enforcing the waiver. To the extent the Anders brief suggests that the plea or the waiver is invalid because of counsel’s ine ffectiveness, we note that the record is not sufficiently developed on the issue, and any such claim should be pursued under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. SeeUnited States v. Hughes , 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

______________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2093 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2093

   To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to rescind 
     approval of the District of Columbia's welfare reform waiver.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 1996

 Mr. Faircloth introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to rescind 
     approval of the District of Columbia's welfare reform waiver.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO RESCIND APPROVAL OF WAIVER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services (in 
this Act referred to as the ``Secretary'') shall rescind approval of 
the waiver described in subsection (b).
    (b) Waiver Described.--The waiver described in this subsection is 
the demonstration project entitled the ``Project on Work, Employment, 
Responsibility (POWER)'', described in the welfare reform demonstration 
special application form submitted by the District of Columbia to the 
Secretary in August 1996 under section 1115 of the Social Security Act, 
and approved by the Secretary on August 19, 1996.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon D. Browning, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      
|----------------------
|                      
|/s/ Gordon D. Browning
|Gordon D. Browning    

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2009
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 4/25/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

FALASHA MANSA MUSA AMEN-RA,

Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

U.S. ARMY PAROLE BOARD and

DEPARTMENT OF ARMY,

Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-3361

(D.C. No. 94-CV-3427)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, McKAY, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Amen-Ra appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus,

28 U.S.C. § 2241. He has been denied parole and contends that application of current

parole guidelines, rather than a provision in effect at that the time of his conviction,

violates the prohibition against ex post facto laws and cruel and unusual punishment. 

We have noted, however, “that the decided weight of authority is that guidelines of this
- 2 -

sort, being guidelines only, are not subject to the ex post facto prohibition.” Resnick v.

United States Parole Comm’n, 835 F.2d 1297, 1301 (10th Cir. 1987). Moreover, given

the discretionary nature of parole, Mr. Amen-Ra has not demonstrated that he has been

disadvantaged by application of the current system. See Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24,

29 (1981). Finally, we decline to consider arguments raised in the brief concerning the

validity of the current provisions that were not raised in the petition.

AFFIRMED. We GRANT Mr. Amen-Ra’s Motion for Leave to Proceed on

Appeal Without Prepayment of Costs or Fees. We DENY Mr. Amen-Ra’s Motion to

Submit Documentary Evidence. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Tucows Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elliot Noss, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify to
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: March 22, 2010

/s/ ELLIOT NOSS Elliot Noss Chief Executive Officer and President


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                           |  |                                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.
|                      |  |  |  | Name:                     |  | Willis H. Newton, Jr.                                
|                      |  |  |  | Title:                    |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### Ex parte Ray Goodwin MILLER.

No. 35002.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 10, 1962.

*880Rutledge & Rutledge by W. J. Rutledge, Jr., Abilene, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an original habeas corpus proceeding attacking as void a conviction in the County Court of Callahan County in a prosecution which was instituted in a Justice Court in said County, the complaint alleging that the relator herein “did then and there unlawfully and wilfully Pass—insufficient Clearance against the peace and dignity of the State.”

Trial de novo in the County Court resulted in a conviction with punishment assessed at a fine of $10, from which no appeal lies. Art. 53 C.C.P.

Relator sought and obtained the issuance of writ of habeas corpus from this Court following his arrest upon capias pro fine issued to enforce the judgment of the County Court.

There is no question but that the complaint does not charge an offense. The question is whether it is void.

If there is a valid law under which a complaint could have been drawn for the act charged, any irregularity or defect of commission or omission which would render the pleading voidable and not void would not entitle the defendant to relief by habeas corpus. Branch’s Ann.P.C. 2d Ed., Sec. 261, and cases cited.

We have been furnished with the record of the trial de novo in County Court from which we find that the relator herein was tried and found guilty of violating Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. Art. 6701d, Sec. 56, of the Uniform Act Regulating Traffic on Highways, the gist of the offense being the driving of a vehicle to the left side of the center of the roadway in overtaking and passing another vehicle proceeding in the same direction, while the left side was not clear of on-coming traffic.

In Ex parte Merriell, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 534, 294 S.W.2d 400, we said: “The rule applied in the Jonischkies case was that the complaint must state facts which, if true, amount to a violation of the law; otherwise, it is void.”

We are aware of no statute which makes it an offense to “unlawfully and wilfully Pass—insufficient Clearance”, and it is clear that if there were such a statute it would be void for indefiniteness.

We do not deem it necessary to review the holding of this Court *in Ex*parte Jonischkies, 88 Tex.Cr.R. 574, 227 S.W. 952, and in Ex parte Minor, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 159, 172 S.W.2d 347, and Ex parte Helton, 128 Tex.Cr.R. 112, 79 S.W.2d 139, which construed and limited said holding. In the latter case we said that the inquiry “ * * * is not whether there is in the indictment such specific allegation of the details of the charge as would make it good on demurrer, but whether the indictment describes a class of offense of which the court has jurisdiction, and alleges the defendant to be guilty.”

We hold that where, as here, no facts are alleged in the complaint which, if true, constitute an offense, and no facts are alleged which show what offense was meant *881to be charged, a final conviction under such complaint is void and may be attacked by habeas corpus.

Relator is ordered discharged from confinement under the capias pro fine.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, Keith Berman, the Principal Executive Officer of InstaCare Corp., and Principal Financial Officer of InstaCare Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InstaCare Corp. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InstaCare Corp.   Date: May 16, 2011  /s/Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to InstaCare Corp. and will be retained by InstaCare Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, Sergio Luz, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of True Product ID, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of True Product, Inc..





By:  /s/ Sergio Luz

Sergio Luz

President and

Principal Financial Officer



Dated: October 1, 2007
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly report of Megola, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Gardner, acting
in the capacity as the President, CEO, Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Joel GardnerJoel
      GardnerPresident,
      CEO, Principal FinancialOfficer
      and Principal Accounting OfficerMarch
      11, 2010