From: Land, Eva

Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:17 PM

To: Rahul Pendse; Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness

(Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com)

Cc: Fortin, Kelly

Subject: BlackHawk/BlackHornet Completeness Letter

Attachments: Completeness Letter 022014.pdf

The BlackHawk and BlackHornet applications were deemed complete, and a completeness letter is

attached.

From: Rahul Pendse [ mailto:RPendse@trinityconsultants.com ]

Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 3 :12 PM

To: Krivo, Stan

Cc: Land, Eva; Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness ( Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com ); Fortin, Kelly

Subject: RE: Anadarko

- BlackHawk/BlackHornet

Hello Stan,

Thanks for the update. On behal f of Anadarko, I would like to thank you and your team for working with

us in getting the questions resolved. Feel free to contact me or Sara Carlson in case of questions during

the detailed review.

Regards,

Rahul

................................................................................................................ Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | Mobile: 714

- 454

- 0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

From: Krivo, Stan [ mailto:Krivo.Stanley@epa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:03 PM

To: Rahul Pendse

Cc: Land, Eva

Subject: RE: Anadarko

- BlackHawk/BlackHornet

Rahul,

Thanks for the responses to the remaining review comments. I believe Anadarko’s responses have

resolved outstanding comments # 19, 21, 22, and 24. I have provided this information to Eva.

I appreciate your help in resolving these and the other air quali ty impact related review comments.

Again thanks...sjkFrom: Rahul Pendse [ mailto:RPendse@trinityconsultants.com ]

Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:52 PM

To: Krivo, Stan

Cc: Land, Eva; Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness ( Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com )

Subject: RE: Anadarko

- BlackHawk/BlackHornet

Hello Stan,

Please find a response to the comment no. 19 in your email below attached herewith. With this

submittal, Anadarko has provided responses to all the comments. Let me or Sara Carlson know if you

have any questions.. Thanks for your help.

Regards,

Rahul

................................................................................................................ Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | Mobile: 714

- 454

- 0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

From: Rahul Pendse

Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 12:33 PM

To: 'Krivo, Stan'

Cc: Land, Eva; 'Carlson, Sara'; Kathryn Maness ( Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com )

Subject: RE: Anadarko

- BlackHawk/BlackHornet

Hell o Stan,

Please find responses to the comments (except for comment no. 19) in your email below attached

herewith. Let me or Sara Carlson know if you have any questions. Sara and I are working on a response

for comment no. 19 and we will get back to you as soon as possible. Thanks for your help.

................................................................................................................ Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | Mobile: 714

- 454

- 0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

From: Krivo, Stan [ mailto:Krivo.Stanley@epa.gov ]

Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:44 PM

To: Rahul PendseCc : Land, Eva

Subject: RE: Anadarko

- BlackHawk/BlackHornet

Rahul,

We keep trying to catch each other concerning the remaining air quality impact concerns from the

comments/clarification requests provided in the incompleteness letter for the BlackHawk and

BlackHornet PSD permit applications. Similar to the Bob Douglas application, the provided responses to

our incompleteness comments did not resolve all items.

To facilitate our discussion and completing the records for these applications, the following provides

the remaining comments not resolved by Anadarko’s 12 November 2013 response.

19. Provide reason the impact assessment using a single supply boat is appropriate given simultaneous

operation of multiple supply boats is planned.

The total fuel limit provided for all utilized supply boats is provided as justification. The emissions from

the modeled supply boat was indicated to be based on the proposed fuel limit so the impact modeling

properly represents the impacts from one or mo re supply boat operations.

The fuel limit for the all supply boats is based on 24

- hour and annual periods. Considering the short

term standards (e.g. 1

- hour NAAQS), the only way the modeled single supply boat would represent the

worst

- case supply boat i mpact would be if the fuel limit included an hourly value and the emissions used

in the modeling were based on the hourly fuel limit consumed by the single boat.

The application indicates the shortest period for supply boat fuel limit was 24

- hours. Multi ple supply

boats could operate under the 24

- hour fuel limit, although not for the full 24

- hours period, producing

larger hourly emissions and greater impacts than that associated with a single boat.

21. Ozone data used in CALPUFF modeling analyses

The use of ozone data representative of the modeling domain and/or the PSD Class I area is

appropriate. Data acquired at Sumatra, FL would be appropriate for St. Marks and Bradwell Bay Class I

impact analyses. The appropriateness for application at the Bret on PSD Class I area has not been

addressed.

22. Screening ambient concentration levels for soils and vegetation.

The EPA referenced screening ambient concentration levels were not addressed in the response. Rather

the response reiterated the fact that t he provided qualitative conclusion was based on the Secondary

NAAQS. Comparison of the screening levels in “A Screening Procedure for Impacts of Air Pollution

Sources on Plants, Soils, and Animals” were not provided.

24. Confirm the Breeze software used the unmodified versions of the regulatory CALPUFF modeling

system.The response indicates the approved versions of the CALPUFF modeling system were

used. Confirmation is needed that the BREEZE modeling system uses for this analysis incorporates the

unmod ified regulatory versions of CALMET, CALPUFF, and CALPOST.

I suggest we discuss these items and the needed additional information before you prepare any

response.

Thanks...sjk

From: Rahul Pendse [ mailto :RPendse@trinityconsultants.com ]

Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 11:08 AM

To: Krivo, Stan

Cc: Land, Eva; Carlson, Sara; Kathryn Maness ( Kathryn.Maness@anadarko.com )

Subject: Anadarko

- BlackHawk/BlackHor net

Hello Stan,

Eva Land informed me that you have a few follow up questions related to the BlackHawk

- BlackHornet

incompleteness letter responses submitted by Anadarko and Trinity. Please let me know if you have

availability tomorrow or next week to dis cuss your questions. Thanks for your help.

................................................................................................................ Rahul Pendse

Managing Consultant

Trinity Consultants

– Baton Rouge

301 Main Street, Suite 900 | Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825

Office: 225

- 346

- 4003 | Mobile: 714

- 454

- 0518

Email: rpendse@trinityconsultants.com

_________________________________________________________________________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient i s prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material

from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________

________________________________________________________________ _________

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in relian ce upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material

from any computer.

_______________________________________________________ __________________

_________________________________________________________________________The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to

which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged

material. Any revi ew, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or

taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or

entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you

Received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material

from any computer.

_________________________________________________________________________