alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0064

SAT Date: 11/9/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77

FATE: Estimations for 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 3.30 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.66 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be 

a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the 

material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the 

lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the . Moderate 

concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.3 aliphatic amine SAR

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.21 aliphatic amine SAR

green algal 96-h EC50 0.078 amide SAR

fish _ chronic value 0.012 amide SAR

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.023 aliphatic amine SAR

algal _ chronic 

value

0.038 aliphatic amine SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; 

SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; ; liquid; log Kow = 5.15 (EPI); S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1 amide SAR

SARs aliphatic amines and amides

SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide

Ecotox Category None
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
:Fergus County

712 W. Main • Lewistown. MT 59457

Ph: 406-535-5119 • Fax: 406-535-9023

email: commissionersts'co.fergus.mt.us

Commissioners:

Carl Seilstad

Ken Ronish

Sandra Youngbauer

July 2,2013

Dennis DeVany

Department of Transportation

Office of the Secretary

Washington, D.C. I .'-'.-

- .:'~ ; .,'

Sent via email to: dennis.devanV@dot.gov; eaS@dot.gov; ,"ecta;:

Mark Hybner@ba,.!Jcus.senate.gov; dzrice@gmail.com

Dear Mr. DeVany,

Please consider this our Petition for Reconsideration regarding Order 2013-6-

13.

Whereas, Public Law 112-27, signed into law on August 5, 2011, amended the

definition of an "eligible place" for the purpose of receiving Essential Air Service

(EAS). Among other things, the amendment states that to be eligible, a

community must have had an average subsidy per passenger of less than

$1,000 during the most recent fiscal year.

Whereas, Public Law 112-95, signed into law on February 14, 2012, further

amended the EAS statutes. Among other things, Section 424 amends 49

V.S.C. 41733 by adding the following.

"(2) PROCEDURES TO AVOID TERMINATION.--The

Secretary shall establish, by order, procedures by

which each community notified of an impending loss

of subsidy under paragraph (1) may work directly

with an air carrier to ensure that the air carrier is

able to submit a proposal to the Secretary to provide

essential air service to such community for an

amount of compensation that would not exceed the

subsidy cap.

"(3) ASSISTANCE PROVIDED.--The Secretary shall

provide, by order, information to each community

notified under paragraph (1) regarding--

"(A) the procedures established pursuant to

1
paragraph (2); and

"(B) the maximum amount of compensation

that could be provided under this subchapter

to an air carrier serving such community that

I would comply with basic essential air service

and the subsidy cap.".

I

Whereas, to the best of our knowledge, the Secretary has not established

procedures by which a community may work with an air carrier to ensure that

the air carrier is able to submit a proposal to provide EAS.

Therefore, we request that the DOT set aside Order 2013-6-13 and allow

subsidized service to continue at all seven communities until such time that

the DOT issues an order establishing the above referenced procedures. Once

the order is issued we request an appropriate amount of time (60 days) to

review the procedures established within the order and seek carriers to work

with directly. After such time has elapsed we request that the DOT issue a new

RFP for all seven Montana communities. It is our opinion that this is the most

appropriate way to move forward.

Yours Truly,

Board of Commissioners

By:_~~_-"""-~~ .~". "",-",-,, '"vt~,--,~=-. ·~~-,--~_.;;;_.1 _

CARLSEILSTAD,County Commissioner

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-Q FOR
PERIOD ENDED 9-30-96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          64,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,176,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                   124,300
<INVENTORY>                                    749,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,238,160
<PP&E>                                       4,620,541
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,205,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,749,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,218,978
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        412
<COMMON>                                       356,031
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,065,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,749,530
<SALES>                                        733,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               733,421
<CGS>                                          643,758
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,884,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                46,248
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,901,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,901,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (111,459)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,013,160)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### DocumentJVumber: 

# ) ll-K - 

# 0 ) Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:58AM Sheet 272 of 325P. 2 

# 'fa 

# Pl M 

# = , 0 II-K-(A)- 4

OVERVIE W O F INDUSTRIA L BOILE R CAS E FOSSI L FUE L US E AN D AI R EMISSIO NPROJECTION S FO R 199 0 an d 199 5 EEA , Inc . Januar y28 , 198 3 THI S INFORMATIO NCA

NB E FOUN D I NDOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE M 

### II-MA M



# J
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-21152

Summary Calendar

RUSSELL WADE EASON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS

DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-2025)

June 24, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Russell Wade Eason, a Texasstate prisoner, appealsthe denial of his petition

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a federal writ of habeas corpus. Eason asserts that he
1 Eason also argues that his parole revocation was heard by a parole officer, not by a

parole board panel as required by state law and, therefore, constituted an unconstitutional

statute. Because this court specifically denied a COA on Eason’s issues regarding violations

ofstate law or policies at the hearing, thisissue is notsubject to review. Lackey v. Johnson,

116 F.3d 149 (5th Cir. 1997).

2 Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972); McBride v. Johnson, 118 F.3d 432 (5th

Cir. 1997).

2

was denied due process in connection with his parole revocation.1 Specifically, he

contends that in determining that he had violated his parole by assaulting and

making terroristic threats against his wife, the hearing officer relied on statements

by Eason’s wife which she recanted, and relied on hearsay to support the recanted

statements.

Our review of the record persuades that Eason was accorded due process in

connection with his parole revocation.2 The record reflects that the hearing officer

did not rely solely on the recanted statements but, rather, also considered the wife’s

testimony and another statement submitted at the hearing which were consistent

with that recanted. Further, the hearing officer’s determination was not based on

hearsay from a neighbor, police officer, medical staff, or the 911 operator, but,

instead, it was based in part on statements that the wife confirmed that she made

to them. Finally, it is clear from the record that Eason’s wife made the challenged

“Shields” statement. Considering that she testified at trial on Eason’s behalf, Eason

manifestly was not denied the right to examine her about same.
3 Lackey, 116 F.3d at 151-52.

3

For the first time on appeal, Eason asserts that he did not testify in his own

defense at the revocation hearing because he had not been granted use-immunity

and any statements he made at the hearing could have been used against him during

the trial on the assault and terroristic threat charges. No certificate of appealability

has been granted on this issue; it is not subject to appellate review.3

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Eason’s motion to expedite the appeal and to place it on the summary docket is

DENIED as moot.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 7398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-02118]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-108]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed January 22, 2024 10 a.m. EST Through January 29, 2024 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20240014, Draft, FTA, NY, Port Authority Bus Terminal 
Replacement Project, Comment Period Ends: 03/18/2024, Contact: Ky 
Woltering 212-668-2558.
EIS No. 20240015, Final Supplement, USFS, AK, Greens Creek North 
Extension Project, Review Period Ends: 03/18/2024, Contact: Matthew 
Reece 907-586-7876.

    Dated: January 29, 2024.
Julie Smith,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2024-02118 Filed 2-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 273

To amend section 61h–6 of title 2, United States Code.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. KEMPTHORNE (for Mr. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To amend section 61h–6 of title 2, United States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 Section 61h–6 of title 2, United States Code, is

4 amended to read as follows:
2

S 273 CPS

1 TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS

2 CHAPTER 4—OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF

3 SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

4 § 61h–6. Appointment of consultants by Majority

5 Leader, Minority Leader, Secretary of

6 Senate, and Legislative Counsel of Sen7 ate; compensation

8 (a) The Majority Leader and the Minority Leader,

9 are each authorized to appoint and fix the compensation

10 of not more than four individual consultants, on a tem11 porary or intermittent basis, at a daily rate of compensa12 tion not in excess of the per diem equivalent of the highest

13 gross rate of annual compensation which may be paid to

14 employees of a standing committee of the Senate.

15 The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to appoint

16 and fix the compensation of not more than two individual

17 consultants, on a temporary or intermittent basis, at a

18 daily rate of compensation not in excess of the per diem

19 equivalent of the highest gross rate of annual compensa20 tion which may be paid to employees of a standing com21 mittee of the Senate.

22 The Legislative Counsel of the Senate (subject to the

23 approval of the President Pro Tempore) is authorized to

24 appoint and fix the compensation of not more than two

25 consultants, on a temporary or intermittent basis, at a
3

S 273 CPS

1 daily rate of compensation not in excess of that specified

2 in the first sentence of this section. The provisions of sec3 tion 8344 of title 5 shall not apply to any individual serv4 ing in a position under this authority. Expenditures under

5 this authority shall be paid from the contingent fund of

6 the Senate upon vouchers approved by the President Pro

7 Tempore, Majority Leader, Minority Leader, Secretary of

8 the Senate, or Legislative Counsel of the Senate, as the

9 case may be.

10 (b) The Majority Leader, and the Minority Leader,

11 in appointing individuals to consultant positions under au12 thority of this section, may appoint one such individual

13 to such position at an annual rate of compensation rather

14 than at a daily rate of compensation, but such annual rate

15 shall not be in excess of the highest gross rate of annual

16 compensation which may be paid to employees of a stand17 ing committee of the Senate.

Æ
December 27, 2001



Mr. Peter R. Fratt
Vice President Real Estate
Ugly Duckling Corporation
4020 East Indian School Road
Phoenix, Arizona  85018

     Re:  Notice of Exercise of Option Six Ugly Duckling  Properties  Identified
          in Exhibit A Attached Hereto

Dear Pete:

     Pursuant  to an Option  Agreement  dated  January  11,  2001  (the  "Option
Agreement"),  Ugly Duckling  Corporation  granted to Verde Investments,  Inc. an
option to acquire certain real property owned or to be acquired by Ugly Duckling
Corporation,  including  the six  properties  identified  in  Exhibit A attached
hereto (the  "Properties").  The purpose of this letter is to provide  notice of
the  exercise  of the option to acquire the  Properties.  The book values of the
Properties,  as reported by Ugly Duckling  Corporation  (the "Book  Values") are
shown in the  attached  Exhibit A.  Verde  Investments,  Inc.  will pay the Book
Values as the gross  purchase price for the Properties as required by the Option
Agreement.  Verde  Investments,  Inc.  is ready,  willing  and able to close the
acquisition of the Properties on or about January 4, 2002.

     Please  acknowledge Ugly Duckling  Corporation's  receipt of this Notice of
Exercise of Option and approval of the Book Values of the  Properties by signing
this letter and returning it to me at your earliest convenience.  Please contact
me at  602-778-5003  if you have any questions or  instructions  regarding  this
matter.

Cordially,



Steven P. Johnson
General Counsel


Acknowledged and approved this ____ day of ___________________, 2001.

Ugly Duckling Corporation,
a Delaware corporation

By:      __________________________________
Name:    __________________________________
Its:     __________________________________


<PAGE>


                                    EXHIBIT A

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


<S>      <C>                                                                                      <C>
Property                                                                                          Book Value

1.       Car dealership located at 13650 Harbor Blvd., Garden Grove, CA  92843                    $2,120,000

2.       Car dealership located at 821 East Division, Arlington, TX  76011                        $1,117,788

3.       Car dealership located at 12180 Garland Road, Dallas, TX  75218                          $1,136,886

4.       Car dealership located at 10501 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX  75220                     $1,352,112

5.       Car dealership located at 1018 East Main Street, Grand Prairie, TX  75050                  $471,638

6.       Car dealership located at 2535 South Crater Road, Petersburg, VA  23805                    $637,933


                                                                                      -------------------------
         Totals                                                                                   $6,836,357
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 3932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; CNS Mechanisms Linking 
Exercise Training with Energy Balance and Metabolism (P01).
    Date: March 27, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Paul A. Rushing, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, 
National Institutes of Health, Room 7345, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8895, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0b797e786362656c7b4b6e737f796a2565626f6f6025656263256c647d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1c3c4c2d9d8dfd6c1f1d4c9c5c3d09fdfd8d5d5da9fdfd8d99fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 16, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01046 Filed 1-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL****OFFICER**


**LEV
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas
      J. Beck, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
      that:





(1)
          The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      the
      Company.





Date:
                August 13, 2007
            
            /s/
                Douglas J. BeckDouglas
                J. BeckChief
                Financial Officer





*This
      Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
      date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
      contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required
      by Section 906 has been provided to Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be
      retained by Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request* *.*
Exhibit 13.2

                      Compania de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as
follows:

1.    I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compania de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
      (the "Company").

2.    (A) The Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 2006
      accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
      "Exchange Act"); and

      (B) The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: June 27, 2007


                                        /S/ CARLOS E. GALVEZ PINILLOS
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Carlos E. Galvez Pinillos
                                        Chief Financial Officer