alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.6

SCHEDULE II  EXTENDICARE INC VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(thousands of dollars)

|                  |  |            |        |            |  |               |        |              |  |                |       |             |  |           |       |   |  |  |   |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        | 
|----------------- |  | ---------- | ------ | ---------- |  | ------------- | ------ | ------------ |  | -------------- | ----- | ----------- |  | --------- | ----- | - |  |  | - |  |  |  | ------ |  |  |  | ------ | 
|                  |  |            |        |            |  | Additions     |        | Subtractions |  |                |       |            
|                  |  |            |        |            |  |               |        |              |  |                |       |            
|                  |  |            |        |            |  | Provisions    |        |              |  |                |       | Additions   |  |           |       |   |  |  |   |  |  |  |        | 
|                  |  |            |        |            |  | for Losses    |        | Additions    |  | (Subtractions) |       |             |  |           |       |   |  |  |   |  |  | 
|                  |  | Balance at |        | on         |  | from          |        | from         |  | Subtractions   |       | Written off |  | Balance  
|Allowance for     |  | Beginning  |        | Accounts   |  | Acquisitions/ |        | Foreign      |  | from           |       | Net of      |  | at End   
|Doubtful Accounts |  | of Period  |        | Receivable |  | Divestitures  |        | Exchange     |  | Divestitures   |       | Recoveries  |  | of Period
|                  |  |            |        |            |  |               |        |              |  |                |       |             |  |          
|Year ended:       |  |            |        |            |  |               |        |              |  |                |       |             |  |           |       |   |  |  |   |  |  |  |        |  |  |  |        | 
|December 31, 2000 |  |            | 37,568 |            |  |               | 26,900 |              |  |                | 3,515 |             |  |           | 1,281 |   |  |  |  |  |  |  | 43,227 |  |  |  | 26,037 | 
|December 31, 2001 |  |            | 26,037 |            |  |               | 9,085  |              |  |                | 5,443 |             |  |           | 1,418 |   |  |  |  |  |  |  | 17,508 |  |  |  | 24,475 | 
|December 31, 2002 |  |            | 24,475 |            |  |               | 17,705 |              |  |                |      |             |  |           | (259  | ) |  |  |  |  |  |  | 25,697 |  |  |  | 16,224 |
# AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION State of Iowa County of Polk, ss.: The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath, states that The Des Moines Register and Tribune Company, a corporation

duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa, with .its principal place of business in
Des

Moines, Iowa, the publisher of 

### THE ALTOONA HERALD-INDEX newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Des Moines; Polk County, Iowa, and that an advertisement,

a printed copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" and made part of this affidavit, was printed and published

in

The Altoona Herald-Index on the following dates: 

### Ad No. 

### 0000777874 Start Date: 

### 10/14/15 Copy of Advertisement 

### Exhibit"A" Run Dates: 

### Cost: 

### 10/14/15 $260.14 Subscribed and sworn to before me by said affiant this 

### 15th day of October 2015 

# ~lie in 

# a: for Polk County, 

# Iowa

# t:ITll!:i:;10ns are not counted for applicability purposes and that

· any·fugitive- dust control plan or its ·equivalent is submitted as

. required by .the Health Officer.
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              | APPLETON PAPERS INC. |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------|
|                              |                 |   |
| Dated:  August 11, 2011 |                 | /s/ Mark R. Richards  |
|                              | Name:                | Mark R. Richards |
|                              | Title:               | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of instaCare Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Keith Berman  Keith Berman


| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| | Principal Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer  May 7, 2010
<PAGE>   1



                                                                   Exhibit 20.2

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                                MELLON BANK, N.A.

                    MELLON BANK HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1


                  The undersigned, a Vice President of Mellon Bank, N.A., as
Servicer ("Mellon Bank N.A."), pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 1996 (as may be amended and
supplemented from time to time, the "Agreement"), among Mellon Bank, N.A., as
Transferor and Servicer, and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, does hereby
certify that:

         1.       Mellon Bank, N.A. is, as of the date hereof, Servicer under
                  the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have
                  their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

         2.       The undersigned is an officer of Mellon Bank who is duly
                  authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate to Trustee.

         3.       A review of the activities of Servicer during the fiscal year
                  ended December 31, 1997, and of its performance under the
                  Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

         4.       Based on such review, Servicer has, to the best of my
                  knowledge, fulfilled all its material obligations under the
                  Agreement throughout such year and no default in the
                  performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this 
Certificate this 20th day of March, 1998.



                              MELLON BANK, N.A., as Servicer



                              By  /s/ Patrick Ryan
                                 ------------------------------
                                   Name:  Patrick Ryan
                                   Title:  Vice President
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Terax Energy, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Bill Chester, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the				requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities				Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report				fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial				condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Bill Cheseter                                      

Bill Chester

President and Principal Financial Officer

May 13, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TOWAMENCIN TOWNSHIP,

Respondent

v.

PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS 

BOARD,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 621 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
1 

### Vetter, Cheryl

From: Vetter, Cheryl

Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 8:27 AM

To: 'Szabo, Aaron'

Cc: Long, Pam

Subject: Final draft of Source Determination

Attachments: EO12866_Source Determination_2060-AS06_NPRM_PreambleRule_20150811.docx

Aaron

–

This is the final draft of the source determination package. The only changes I have made from the version earlier this

week are to the public hearing information. No changes to the substance of the package.

Cheryl Vetter

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

OAQPS/AQPD/NSRG (C504-03)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone (919) 541-4391 Fax (919) 541-5509

Note: Positions or views expressed he re do not represent official EPA policy.
Report of Independent Public Accountants


To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements of
Household Finance Corporation (the 'Company') and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and have issued our
report thereon dated January 20, 1999.  We have not audited
any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to December 31, 1998, or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on
those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention
that caused us to believe that the Company was not in
compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or 
conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated May 1, 1996, in conjunction with the
Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series
1996-1 insofar as they relate to accounting matters.  It
should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed
primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of
the Company's system of internal accounting controls over
the Company's home equity loan portfolio, including those
loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we
considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by
generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with
these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation,
which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting
systems, was to determine the nature, timing and extent of
the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion
on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also
took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit
requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised
Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.  However, certain procedures included in the
audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans
being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not
performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records
relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that,
in our opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to
report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and
should not be used for any other purpose.

     
                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Chicago, Illinois
January 20, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5249-5250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Initial 
Review Group; Medication Development Research Study Section.

[[Page 5250]]

    Date: March 13, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Preethy Nayar, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 
North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-
4577, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#630d021a02111351230010114d0d0a0b4d040c15"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90fef1e9f1e2e0a2d0f3e3e2befef9f8bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01568 Filed 1-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: CYNTHIA A. W ARK,

Appellant

______________________

2018

- 1901

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 14/556,359.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

T HOMAS Y OUNG

, Young Basile Hanlon & MacFarlane

P.C., Troy, MI, argued for appellant.

M AI

- T RANG D UC D ANG

, Office of the Solicitor, United

States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by

T HOMAS W. K RAUS E

, J OSEPH M ATAL

, M OLLY R. S ILFEN

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (T ARANTO

, S CHALL

, and C HEN

, Circuit

Judges ).AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 9, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2020

N o. 04

- 19

- 00688

- CV

Marissa PETERSON,

Appellant

v.

HEB GROCERY CO., L.P.,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 19610

Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion , Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Appellee’s motion for rehearing is DENIED.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of August, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 216 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 216

   To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of expenses for 
                   business meals and entertainment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 12 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

Mr. Inouye (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Bryan, Mr. Reid, Mr. Smith, Mr. 
 Coats, Mr. Johnston, Mr. Faircloth, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Stevens, and Mr. 
   Hollings) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To repeal the reduction in the deductible portion of expenses for 
                   business meals and entertainment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REDUCTION IN BUSINESS MEALS AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 274(n) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to only 50 percent of meal and 
entertainment expenses allowed as deduction) is amended by striking 
``50 percent'' and inserting ``80 percent''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The heading for section 274(n) is 
amended by striking ``50'' and inserting ``80''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1993.
                                 <all>
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 10530 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOSUE MARTINEZ

- GARCIA , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 260

Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Josue Martinez

- Garcia pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1)(2). He appeals the within

guidelines sentence of 57 months and three years of super vised release, arguing that the sentence is substantively unreasonable

. Martinez

- Garcia’s sentence is presumed to be reasonable. See United States v. Mondragon

- Santiago , 564 F.3d 357, 360 (5th Cir. 2009). His

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 25, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10530 Document: 00512608563 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2014No. 13

- 10530
argument that the court failed to account for his personal history and characteristics, the nature and circumstances of his illegal reentry offense, and the circumstance of a prior conviction that resulted in an enhancement of his sentencing range, is essentially a request that th is court reweigh the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors , which would contravene the deference that this court afford s the sentencing court’s decision. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) ; Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007)

. Martinez

- Garcia’s argu ments do not establish that his sentence fails to take into account a factor that should receive significant weight, gives significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or represents a clear error of judgment in balancing the sentencing factors. See United States v. Cooks , 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009). He therefore has not rebutted the presumption of reasonableness that applies to his within

g uidelines sentence. See id

. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is AFFIR MED.

2 Case: 13-10530 Document: 00512608563 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2014
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2014

d1217

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2014

149738

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149738

COA: 321407

Barry CC: 13-000144-FH

LONNIE LEE MANN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 4, 2014 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of People 

v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the 

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

August 17, 2012

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with NADA and Penske Automotive Group to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Greenhouse Gas an d CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017- 2025 Light-Duty Vehicles

FROM: William Charmley, US EPA

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo documents a meeting held on June 18, 2012 between representatives of the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), Penske Autom otive, and EPA to discuss the EPA/NHTSA Joint Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for G reenhouse Gas and CAFE Standards for Model Year 2017-2025 Light-Duty Vehicles. This meeting took place in Washington, D.C.

The meeting attendees included Phil Brady, Presiden t of NADA, and Roger Penske, Chief Executive Officer of Penske Automotive Group, and M argo Oge, Director of EPA’s Office of Transportation and Air Quality.

During this meeting NADA and Penske Automotive disc ussed a number of the issues contained

in the NADA written comment on the NPRM. In additi on, the topic of the mid-term review proposed in the NPRM was discussed. Mr. Brady and Mr. Penske indicated they would consider sending supplemental comments regarding th e NPRM specifically with respect to the

mid-term review.
Appendix F. Legal Notification of Public Comment Period, 

Public Comments Received, Public Hearing Documents, and 

Response to Public Comments
This page intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing.
Legal Notification of Public Comment Period
This page intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing.








Public Comments Received
This page intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing.




Public Hearing Documents
This page intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing.


Response to Public Comments
This page intentionally left blank for correct double-sided printing.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
             Date: September 17, 2008/s/ Andrew F. PuzderAndrew F. PuzderPresident and Chief Executive Officer