alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2059 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2059

   To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to executory 
        contracts and unexpired leases, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 1996

 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. Heflin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to executory 
        contracts and unexpired leases, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Non-Monetary Default and Unexpired 
Lease in Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. EXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED LEASES.

    Section 365(b)(2)(D) of title 11, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``with respect to an executory contract or 
        an unexpired lease of personal property,'' before ``the 
        satisfaction''; and
            (2) by inserting ``penalty'' before ``provision''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21

                                  Subsidiaries

ProCath Corporation d/b/a EP MedSystems
575 Route 73 North
Bldg D
West Berlin, New Jersey 08091
State of Incorporation:   New Jersey
Business Name:            ProCath Corporation

EP MedSystems UK Ltd.
100 Stierli Court, Suite 107
Mount Arlington, New Jersey 07856
State of Incorporation:   New Jersey
Business Name:            EP MedSystems, Europe Ltd.

EP MedSystems France S.A.R.L.
12, Avenue du Quebec, Batiment H
Entree 9, SILIC 633
Courtaboeuf Cedex, 91965, France
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 21-0125
BOB BROWN,DOROTHY BRADLEY, MAENAN ELLINGSON,VERNON FINLEY, and MONTANA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS, Petitioners,
v. GREG GIANFORTE,Governor ofthe State of Montana, Respondent. 

# RLED APR 1 4 2021
Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

The Montana State Legislature has filed a motion wherein it "respectfully requests leave of the Court to intervene as a Respondent in this matter." The motion states the Legislature seeks intervention because "it is specifically vested with the constitutional authority to determine the process by which nominees are selected for gubernatorial appointment to fill judicial vacancies, it has an interest in defending the constitutionality ofthe laws it enacts,and the Montana State Senate has a constitutional role in confirming judicial appointments." Intervention in a proceeding pending before this Court is a discretionary determination. M.R. App.P. 2(1)(f)(defining "Intervenor" as one "who, on motion, is granted leave to enter a proceeding before this court,despite notbeing named originally as aparty"). The Legislature indicates that it will submitits summary response to the Petition by the previously ordered deadline ofApril 14,2021. Asrequired by M.R.App.P 16(1), the Legislature states it has contacted opposing counsel to determine whether opposing counsel objects to the motion. The Legislature states it has obtained opposing counsel's 04/14/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0125

### consent to the motion upon the Legislature's commitment "to abide by and comply with

all orders ofthe Court." Upon these assertions by the Legislature, the Court concludes it can properly intervene into this matter and that leave should be granted. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to intervene by the Montana State Legislature is granted. The Intervenor shall file its response by April 14,2021. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord in this matter.DATED this i* day ofApril,2021.

Justices

2
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fun City Popcorn, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
Falk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


                                            /s/  RICHARD FALK
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 Richard Falk
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Aug 14, 2003
Exhibit 31(a)
 
              By:
    /s/ Geoffrey D. KnappGeoffrey D. KnappChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Karrington Health, Inc. Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended
December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       4,370,488
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,462,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,114,960
<PP&E>                                     119,909,422
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,926,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,315,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,808,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    33,484,712
<OTHER-SE>                                 (6,978,170)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,315,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,219,883
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,683,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,273,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,380,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,743,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,860,404)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   190,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,670,404)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,670,404)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.83)


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HHS-NIH-CDC-SBIR PHS 2024-1 Phase I: Point-of-Care HIV Viral Load and Drug Adherence Assays (Topic 001).                    

*Date:*                         February 26, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G21A, Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Shiv A. Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G21A, Rockville, MD 20852,                         *shiv.prasad@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 26, 2024.

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-01962 Filed 1-31-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 4 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00653

- CR

CHAD SMALL , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1349798

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal of an order granting the State’s motion to
dismiss

. The State filed a motion to dismiss in trial court cause number 1349798 because appellant was convicted in trial court cause numbers 1383973 and
1349797. 1
Generally, an appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman

1 In his notice of appeal appellant states he has been granted permission to appeal by the trial court. Such notice, however, does not appear in the record before this court.2

v. State , 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State , 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth 1996, no pet.).
An order granting the State’s motion to dismiss is not a separately appealable order. Because this appeal does not fall within the exc eptions to the general rule that appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we have no jurisdiction.
In addition, the order appellant attempts to appeal was signed May 9, 2014, but the notice of appeal was not filed until July 28, 2014. A defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the
defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)( 1). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim

. App. 1998).
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App. P. 4 7.2(b).
# CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

LINDA S.ADAMS

SECRETARY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 1001 I STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 • P.O. Box 2815, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-2815 (916) 323-2514· (916) 324.{)908 FAX • WWW.CALEPA.CA.GOy ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER GOVERNOR

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105-3901

Thank you for your letter of October 19, 2010 to Governor Schwarzenegger seeking the . position of the State of California (State) on the proposed listing of the New Idria Mercury

Mine on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). The State of California agrees that the environmental threats identified in your letter must be addressed; however we are concerned with the long-term funding obligations that typically fall to the State at sites like the New Idria Mercury Mine. Accordingly, concurrence with this listing or with any future Record of Decision and subsequent agreement to State Superfund Contracts must be based in part on selection of optimal remedial actions that limit or eliminate long-term operation and maintenance (O&M) costs. Where appropriate, the State will be looking to the United States EPA for substantial application of removal action funding and support for identification and selection of protective remedies which will reduce State cost share requirements. The State will also be seeking a cooperative partnership with U.S. EPA to aggressively pursue cost recovery against viable responsible parties and to creatively identify alternative funding sources. Finally, the State will be looking to the U.S. EPA to help develop long-term sustainability and optimization of funding sources for cleanup of both NPL fund lead and State sites. Meeting this objective will require close coor9ination with U.S. EPA in developing funding strategies for existing fund lead sites, as weH as consideration of potential long-term burden on the State in selection of future NPL sites. Long-term O&M at fund lead sites may require management in a fashion that optimizes utilization of available funding which could include reduction or elimination of certain O&M activities based on established budget priorities.

AIR RESOURCES BOARD· DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION· DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD AsSESSMENT STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD • REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDSMr~ Jared Blumenfeld Page 2
To the extent that the above conditions are acceptable to U.S. EPA, the State supports the listing of New Idria Mercury Mine on the NPL.

inda S. Adams Secretary for Environmental Protection
cc: Mr. Thomas Howard Executive Director State Water Resources Control Board Post Office Box 100 Sacramento, California 95812-0100
Ms. Pamela Creedon Executive Officer Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region 11020 Sun Center Drive, Suite 200 Rancho Cordova, California 95670 Mr. Maziar Movassaghi Acting Director Department of Toxic Substances Control· Post Office Box 806 Sacramento, California 95812-0806
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-81772), Form
S-3 (No. 333-47399), Form S-3 (No. 333-80427), and Form S-3 (No. 333-44722) of
our report dated March 11, 2004 relating to the financial statements and
financial statement schedule, appearing on page 54 of Post Properties, Inc.'s
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 11, 2004
I F 

A'jtum-LewiElcjri 

Municipal Airport 

FIv to ME A 

H. MtCHAinj 

> DC mi s 

r^acoiTn-Ttn 

jVi^m26, 2010 

The HcMionble Ray LoHood 

Secretny of Transportttion 

U S. Dq>HtnKRt of TranspomtioR 

1200 >4ew Je^ y Ave. SE 

Washington '^ •;; :=3: ^ , D.C. 20590 , ^ ^z'^rr^ 

Dew Secrrtwy l-aHood: •S^:T 3 

1 Ml wtia g to exfKTSs ray atnx^ siqf^tort for t!w apjtfJEation sulKnitlKJ by ihc Artumi- i^zo ^ 

Lewiatin Mimicipal Aifport for funding through rtw Seull Corrammty AM- Serviee - ^ ^^ ^ 

Dcvek^mmt Progrsm. The addition of p«M«iger air serviw will twild u^ i economic ^iiH~ ^ 

develDpDQMt elTorti in the «rea and support the lai^crgoai ofeiqwndingand impTOvingair Q J f-^iO Q 

EFrvice in tht re^on. 

During my time in of^ce, I have been proud to support investments in the Aubmn-Lewbton 

Municipal Airport. At a time when ouf ociMiamy is strtiggling, it makes sense to si^port 

mExspoitation infrastructure improvemRits Mat will inorcasc economic activi^ and provide 

budnesGes with atUitionoJinccntfves 03 loc^fic or expand in d^wea . The addithn of 

pa^en ^ air ser^cc will improve aiM^ss lo the re^ of the cwunry fhim Qvt regioa Hid 

complonent cflbrts thnt are okeady underway to ocfond the &d1ity's runway and extena^ve 

cargo busioes. 

Add itk)fuUiy,tfi«eesi£^cam support for the projeawkhm the r^[km. Onb ^ Miine 

Medical Cenur, St. Mary's Mcdkal Ca^ci, Bates College, the Andcoscoggu) Coun^ 

Chamber of Commerce, the Androscoggin VaJI^ Cotstctl of flcmnnmeot, tfic UnivRiyty of 

Maine and others have all expitssed both a dcsiiX! md a lued fur this service. The Lewinon 

C ^ CoiHicil atKl £he Aubtm City Cotsidl Invc each cxfHrcs^ a desire to su^xm local air 

service. 

I hope thtf you will consider si^iportiog Ihe application submitted by tfie AubunvLewisum 

Municipal Airport and d% l«s ^ goal of exputding air service throug^ul M»ne. Woricmg 

togetlw, wc can enflore the contimied ecommtic growA of the Lewiston-Ai^wm area. 

With warni(^ r^anJs, 

00 

f\JjMH*jLP 

Michael H. Michaud 

Member of Congiwi 

S«MI •nm.a^TT UiE 1 ^ UniDia laain. a»flH Biavi 

Pi.k«-.pBT|BO.I 

Auburn-Lewiston Municipal Airport - Small CommuniTy Air Service Developmeni Grant-August 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                       CONVERTIBLE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

      THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (the "Second
Amendment") is made and entered into as of April 12, 2005, by and among
NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Maker") and
____________ (the "Holder"). This Amendment amends the Note (as defined below).

                                    RECITALS

A. Section 10 of that certain Convertible Secured Promissory Note, dated as of
November 12, 2003 and amended on April 26, 2004, by and between the Maker and
the Holder (the "Note"), states that any provision of such note may be amended
or waived in writing by the Holder and the Maker; and

B. The Maker and the Holder wish to amend the Note as provided below.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as
follows:

      "1. Maturity Date. The aggregate principal amount of this Note and accrued
interest thereon shall be due and payable on July 12, 2005 (the "Maturity
Date")."

2. All other terms and conditions of the Note shall be unaffected hereby and
remain in full force and effect.

3. This Second Amendment shall be governed by and construed under the laws of
the state of Washington as applied to agreements among Washington residents
entered into and to be performed entirely within the State of Washington.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

                                       1

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this SECOND AMENDMENT
TO CONVERTIBLE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE as of the date first above written.

MAKER:

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By: ___________________________________
Name: _________________________________
Title: ________________________________

HOLDER:

_______________________________________
Name: _________________________________

                                       2
Exhibit 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                                 OF CEO AND CFO
                        PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of AFG Enterprises, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Erich Spangenberg, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and William P. Stelt, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of his knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


April 15, 2005

                                       By:   /s/ Erich Spangenberg
                                            ------------------------------------
                                              Erich Spangenberg, CEO


                                       By:   /s/ William P. Stelt
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             William P. Stelt, CFO


                                       35
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cesar MURILLO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-30422.

D.C. No. CR-01-30052-MRH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 2002.

Decided Jan. 30, 2003.

Before REAVLEY,* KOZINSKI, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

*

 Honorable Thomas M. Reavley, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in *United States v. Moreno-Cisneros,*— F.3d-, No. 01-30421 (9th Cir. Jan. 31, 2003).

AFFIRMED.

W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

Judge Fletcher dissents for reasons in his dissent to *United States v. Moreno-Cisneros.*

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.