alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jijibhoy J. PATEL and Silloo Patel, Petitioners—Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 02-15642.

D.C. No. CV-98-01723-WBS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 2003.

Decided Jan. 30, 2003.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, NOONAN and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Dr. Jijibhoy Patel and his wife Silloo appeal the dismissal of their 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition as untimely under the An-titerrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s (“AEDPA”) one-year statute of limitations. We affirm.

The Patels argue that this petition should relate back to their previously dismissed petition in 1993. The district court dismissed the earlier petition without prejudice because its claims overlapped those in a pending direct appeal of the Patels’ tax evasion conviction. Because the earlier petition was properly dismissed, there was no pending petition to which the Pa-tels’ new petition could relate back or which they could amend. *See Henry v. Lungren,*164 F.3d 1240, 1241 (9th Cir. 1999).

The Patels filed their second habeas petition outside of AEDPA’s one-year limitation period for prisoners to file habeas petitions in federal court. As to Dr. Patel, the district court properly dismissed the petition as time-barred. *See Green v. White,*223 F.3d 1001, 1003 (9th Cir.2000). Silloo Patel was not in custody when the 1998 petition was filed. Because it does not relate back to the earlier petition, the district court lacked jurisdiction over her petition. *See Henry,*164 F.3d at 1241.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2


            CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of PFS Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB
for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

                                      /s/Stuart M. Suggs
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Name:  Stuart M. Suggs
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 14, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to PFS Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained
by PFS Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
10.16


 


OMEGA
FLEX, INC.


Phantom
Stock Agreements


Schedule
of Directors and Officers


As
of December 31, 2016


 


	Director/Officer	 	Type	 	Number	 	 	Grant Date	 	Grant Price	 	 	Maturity Date	 	Vesting Schedule
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dean W. Rivest	 	Full	 	 	1,500	 	 	04/03/2013	 	$	15.01	 	 	04/03/2017	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	3 years
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Paul J. Kane	 	Full	 	 	1,500	 	 	04/03/2013	 	$	15.01	 	 	04/03/2017	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	3 years
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Edwin B. Moran	 	Full	 	 	1,500	 	 	04/03/2013	 	$	15.01	 	 	04/03/2017	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	3 years
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Steven A. Treichel	 	Full	 	 	2,100	 	 	04/03/2013	 	$	15.01	 	 	04/03/2017	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	2,550	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	2,550	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	2,550	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	3 years
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Timothy P. Scanlan	 	Full	 	 	1,500	 	 	04/03/2013	 	$	15.01	 	 	04/03/2017	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	1,800	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	3 years
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Steven Hockenberry	 	Full	 	 	590	 	 	04/03/2013	 	$	15.01	 	 	04/03/2017	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	710	 	 	02/19/2014	 	$	20.20	 	 	02/19/2018	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	710	 	 	02/16/2015	 	$	31.26	 	 	02/16/2019	 	3 years
	 	 	Full	 	 	710	 	 	02/16/2016	 	$	33.02	 	 	02/16/2020	 	3 years
#### Harry E. BOOKS and Kate C. Books, Respondents. v. Sadonia ROBINSON, Appellant.

No. 22426.

Kansas City Court of Appeals. Missouri.

Nov. 5, 1956.

*581D. M. Cuthbertson, Fulton, for appellant.

W. C. Whitlow, Fulton, for respondents.

BROADDUS, Judge.

This suit was instituted by plaintiffs, Harry E. and Kate C. Books, against defendant, Sadonia Robinson, to determine the boundary line between their adjoining lots in the City of Fulton, Missouri, and for trespass and damages. A jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court. At the conclusion of the evidence the court found the issues for plaintiffs, but “that there are no damages due to the plaintiffs.” Defendant has appealed.

This being a suit to establish a boundary line, it does not so involve the title to real estate as to deprive this court of jurisdiction. Albi v. Reed, Mo.Sup., 281 S.W.2d 882.

Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground appellant’s brief fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 1.08, 42 V.A.M.S. The motion was ordered taken with the case. This rule reads in part as follows: “(a) * * * The brief for appellant shall contain: * * * (3) The points relied on, which shall show what actions or rulings of the Court are sought to be reviewed and *wherein*and *why*they are claimed to be erroneous, with citation of authorities thereunder, * * * (4) An argument. * * * * (d) The points relied on shall briefly and concisely state what actions or rulings of the Court are claimed to be erroneous and briefly and concisely state *why*it is contended the Court was wrong in any action or ruling sought to be reviewed. *Setting out only abstract statements of law without shozving how they are related to any action or ruling of the Court is not a compliance with this rule.”*(Italics supplied.)

Appellant has completely ignored the above rule. Her points are mere abstract statements of law without showing in any way how they pertain to this case. The penalty for failure to comply with Rule 1.08 is dismissal or affirmance of the judgment, “unless good cause is shown or the interests of justice otherwise require.” She Rule 1.15. Good cause is not shown. We are satisfied from our study of the briefs that the interests of justice do not require any different disposition of the case.

The following, among many other authorities, sustain respondents’ motion to dismiss. Ambrose v. M. F. A. Co-operative Ass’n, Mo.Sup., 266 S.W.2d 647; Fisher v. Lavelock, Mo.Sup., 290 S.W.2d 655.

The appeal should be dismissed. It is so ordered.

All concur.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Boston Communications
Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, E.Y. Snowden, President and Chief Executive Officer, and
Karen A. Walker, Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                    |  |                                                                                       
|------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 9, 2005 |  | /s/    E. Y.
Snowden                                                                  
|                    |  | E.Y. Snowden President and Chief Executive
Officer                                    
|                    | 
|Date: March 9, 2005 |  | /s/    Karen A.
Walker                                                                
|                    |  | Karen A. Walker Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Boston Communications Group, Inc., and will be retained by Boston Communications Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), effective as of January 9, 2012 and amended
thereafter, by and between Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Michael Macaluso (the “Executive”) is made as of March 9, 2017 (“Amendment Date”). 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive (together, the “Parties”) entered into the Employment Agreement; 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to extend the term of the Employment Agreement through January 9, 2020; and

 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to modify the Employment Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 

1. The first sentence of Section 1 of the Employment Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety with the following sentence: 

“The Company hereby agrees to employ Employee and Employee hereby accepts such employment with the Company for the period through
January 9, 2020. 
 2. There shall be added to the end of Section 3(d) the following sentence: 

“If a Bonus is granted by the Compensation Committee during a Trading Window (as defined in the Company’s Statement of Insider
Trading Policy), Executive shall have 24 hours to elect to have the Bonus paid in cash or in Common Stock of the Company pursuant to the Company’s 2010 Stock and Incentive Plan.” 

3. In connection with the Amendment, the Compensation Committee of the Company hereby agrees to grant to the Chief Executive Officer a
non-qualified option to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock effective as of the date of this amendment, 133,333 shares of which will vest on each of January 9, 2018 and January 9, 2019 and 133,334 shares of which
will vest on January 9, 2020. 
 4. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement, including the annual salary of $300,000, shall
remain in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment
Date written above. 
  

			
	AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Philip H. Coelho
	Name:	 	Philip H. Coelho
	Its:	 	Board Member and Chairman of the Compensation Committee


  

			
	
	 /s/ Michael Macaluso

	MICHAEL MACALUSO



  
 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, William D. Green, Chief Executive Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general
partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: April 8, 2005 /s/ William D. GreenWilliam D. GreenChief Executive Officer of Accenture
Ltd,
General Partner of Accenture SCA
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

*CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael Brodeur, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.            The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.            The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:   December 7, 2007 | By:    | /s/  Michael A. Brodeur                               |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   | Michael  A. Brodeur                                   |   |
|                           |   | Vice  President, Finance and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



2017 Cash Bonus Plan


Eligible Employees: Executive Officers, Vice Presidents, Directors, Managers, and Individual Contributors


		
	•
	Bonus target payouts based on a percentage of base salary;




		
	•
	Payouts to CEO, CFO , COO and Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary will be entirely based on achievement of certain minimum targets, and 200% payable upon the achievement of certain maximum target levels;




		
	•
	Payouts to other VPs are based 50% on corporate targets, and 50% on management business objectives;




		
	•
	Payouts to Directors are based 30% on corporate targets, and 70% on management business objectives;




		
	•
	Payouts to Managers are based 0% on corporate targets, and 100% on management business objectives;




		
	•
	Payouts to Individuals Contributors are based 0% on corporate targets, and 100% on management business objectives;




		
	•
	Bonus targets are as follows (expressed as a percentage of base salary):




        	
							
	 
	 
	Target Payout
	 
	Financial Weight (Adj. EBITDA)
	 
	Management Business Objectives Weight

	CEO
	 
	75%
	 
	100%
	 
	0%

	CFO
	 
	50%
	 
	100%
	 
	0%

	COO
	 
	50%
	 
	100%
	 
	0%

	VP & General Counsel
	 
	40%
	 
	100%
	 
	0%

	VPs
	 
	25%
	 
	50%
	 
	50%

	Directors
	 
	15%
	 
	30%
	 
	70%

	Managers
	 
	10%
	 
	0%
	 
	100%

	Individual Contributors
	 
	5%
	 
	0%
	 
	100%
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 279

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel WHY KNOT.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize a certificate of documentation for the vessel

WHY KNOT.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding section 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 App. U.S.C. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 for the vessel WHY KNOT, United States official number

9 688570.

Æ
#### Gary EVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John KNODELL; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-36170.

D.C. No. CV-99-00323-AAM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2002 *.

Decided July 30, 2002.

Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gary Evans appeals pro se the district court’s sua sponte dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging false arrest and imprisonment, reckless investigation, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s sua sponte dismissal under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), *Omar v. Sea-Land Serv.,*813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir.1987), and we reverse.

Evans contends that the district court erred in finding that his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action was barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). We agree.

The district court concluded that because the criminal charges against Evans were dismissed without prejudice, the charges could be re-filed in the future and Evans’ section 1983 action, if successful, would necessarily invalidate any future conviction. This circuit held in *Harvey v. Waldron,*210 F.3d 1008, 1014 (9th Cir. 2000), that section 1983 actions do not accrue “so long as the potential for a conviction in the pending criminal prosecution continues to exist.” Here, there was no pending criminal prosecution against Evans, so *Heck*does not apply. Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhbit 99.05

          CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        I, Gary Westerholm , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Mckenzie Bay International Ltd. on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Mckenzie Bay
International Ltd..


  Date:  August 14, 2002   By: /s/ Gary L. Westerholm
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Gary L. Westerholm
                                   President and Director
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)




        I, Gregory N. Bakeman , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Mckenzie Bay International Ltd.on Form 10-QSB for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Mckenzie Bay
International Ltd.

Date:  August 14, 2002    By: /s/ Gregory N. Bakeman
                                  -----------------------------
                                  Gregory N. Bakeman
                                  Chief Financial Officer and Director
                                  (Principal, Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit
10.60


 





 


March
14, 2017


 


Dr. Dragan
Cicic

393 17th Street, Apt 1A


Brooklyn,
NY 11215


 


Dear
Dr. Cicic:


 


This
letter hereby amends your employment agreement, dated January 2, 2006, as amended, with Actinium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Employment
Agreement”). Pursuant to this amendment your title will be Chief Technical Officer. All other provisions in the Employment
Agreement, as amended, shall remain the same.


 


To
indicate your acceptance of this agreement, please sign and date this letter in the space provided below and return it to me.


 


	Very
    truly yours,	 	ACCEPTED
    AND AGREED:
		 	 	 
	ACTINIUM
    PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.	 	DRAGAN
    CICIC
	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/
    Sandesh Seth	 	/s/
    Dragan Cicic
	 	

        

        Sandesh
        Seth
	 	 
	 	Executive
    Chairman	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:	March 16, 2017	 	Date:  March
    16, 2017
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY
                              (for Frank P. Willey)


KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the  undersigned  constitutes and appoints
Ernest C.  Garcia  II,  Gregory  B.  Sullivan,  Steven T.  Darak,  and Steven P.
Johnson,  and each of them, his true and lawful  attorney-in-fact and agent with
full power of substitution and  resubstitution,  for him and in his name, place,
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended  December 31,  1998,  for filing with the  Securities  and
Exchange   Commission   ("SEC")  by  Ugly  Duckling   Corporation,   a  Delaware
corporation, together with any and all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file
the same with all exhibits thereto,  and all documents in connection  therewith,
with the SEC, granting to such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, and each of them,
full  power  and  authority  to do and  perform  each and  every  act and  thing
requisite and  necessary to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully and to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming  all that such  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  or each of them,  may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



DATE: February 25, 1999



                                                             /S/ FRANK P. WILLEY
                                                             -------------------
                                                                 FRANK P. WILLEY
Order entered October 18, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 12 - 00227 - CV BO KYOUNG KIM AND SA NG J. PARK, Appellant s V. SOK SAN PAK AND SOO - KYUNG PAK, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Col lin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416 - 00730 - 2008 

### O RDER The Court has been informed that the bankruptcy stay that caused the Court to abate this case has concluded

. We REINSTATE this case and ORDER appellants to file their brief within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 23



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT



The Board of Directors

ICT Group, Inc.



We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-87912) and registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-32623, 333-56187, 333-55702, 333-97357 and 333-111531) of ICT Group, Inc. of our report dated February 9, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ICT Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and
related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of ICT Group, Inc.



|            
|------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 10, 2004