alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of-- Rodney Hunt-Fontaine, Inc. Under Contract No. W91237-14-C-0006 APPEARANCE FOR THEAPPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ) ) ) ) ) ASBCA No. 59943

Erin L. Toomey, Esq.

Foley & Lardner LLP Detroit, MI Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Willie J. Williams, Esq. Bradley J. Stark, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Huntington ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 11 May 2016

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59943, Appeal ofRodney Hunt-Fontaine, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,280,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,939,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,693,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,002,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,693,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,270,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,010,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                260,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   104,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            156,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               2,481,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,637,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**LEV
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**


**FORM
      10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Joshua
      D. Schein, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
      that:





(1)  The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                August 9, 2006
            
            /s/
                Joshua D. Schein, Ph.D.Joshua
                D. Schein, Ph.D.Chief
                Executive Officer
1 Whalen, Marilyn

From: Jordan Nakamura <jordan.nakz@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 4:54 PM To: RedHill; roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov; Higuchi, Dean Subject: Red Hill Attachments: X-Bond System Full Tech Sheet Ad Repair. pdf; SEMCO X-Bond Benefits.pdf; SEMCO MSS Product Profile_Waterproofing R ed Hill.pdf; SEMCO X-Bond Detailed Data Sheet Red Hill.pdf

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

To Whom It May Concern,

I understand there is still an opportunity for public co mment regarding the Red Hill Fuel Tanks, but I am not sure if this is the correct place to send information about an option for the repairs and upgrades needed. Our company, Precision Flooring Inc., has been using a produc t line called Semco and I wanted to pass on the information of this seamle ss, waterproofing system.

From what I understand the repairs and upgrades may re quire a nonporous material to reduce microbes that can speed up corrosion as well as double lin ing of the interior to prevent futu re leaks. Semco's proprietary X-Bond product may be a solution to this unique problem as it is a durable, nonporous, and seamless waterproof product that can adhere to almost any surface , including metal, and is also capable of vertical and below grade use. XBond is a lightweight cementitious product that is incapab le of delaminating when installed correctly, and is able to flex with the existing substrat e without cracking. It is also chemical resistant, but there is no specific or definitive information about resistance to the JP-8 jet fu el contained in the fuel tanks. Our company works very closely with Semco, and I have already reached out to them to see if they feel the products will be capable of containing such fuel. They believe it is, but further sp ecific testing would need to be conducted for accurate results and data.

I have attached documents that c ontain more detailed information a bout Semco and it's proprietary X-Bond product. Please contact me if you have any questions or require further information.

Mahalo, Jordan Nakamura Precision Flooring Inc.
##### 



Exhibit 10.23
 Premium Standard Farms, Inc.
Description of
Incremental Performance Bonus Plan
 Adoption:
    
    Adopted by the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors
of Premium Standard Farms, Inc. (the
Company) on September 29, 2006Purpose:
    
    To compensate certain employees of
the Company whose efforts will be
critical to the closing of the
pending merger between the Company
and a subsidiary of Smithfield
Foods, Inc.Participants:
    
    Five officers, including three
executive officers, of the Company,
including Stephen A. Lightstone, the
Companys Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer and a named executive
officer of the CompanyAmount of Bonuses:
    
    The Compensation Committee
recommended that performance bonuses
be paid in an aggregate amount of up
to $425,000, with Mr. Lightstone
eligible to receive a performance
bonus of up to $100,000Bonuses are Discretionary:
    
    All performance bonuses paid under
the Plan will be discretionary and
subject to the approval of the
Companys Chief Executive Officer
and its Chairman of the Board of
Directors
 31
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 212 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                 S. 212

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, 
United States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
App. U.S.C. 883), as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V (United States official 
number 900936).

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 212

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
               coastwise trade for the vessel SHAMROCK V.
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2155

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer funds to the farmers’

market nutrition program, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1996

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. MCCONNELL, and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to transfer funds

to the farmers’ market nutrition program, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO FARM4 ERS’ MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM.

5 For fiscal year 1997, the Secretary of Agriculture

6 may transfer after consultation with the Appropriations

7 Committees of the House of Representatives and the Sen8 ate, from any funds available to the Secretary, up to

9 $2,000,000 to the farmers’ market nutrition program
2

•S 2155 IS

1 under section 17(m) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966

2 (42 U.S.C. 1786(m)). Amounts authorized to be trans3 ferred under the preceding sentence shall be in addition

4 to any amounts authorized to be made available to the

5 program under title IV of the Agriculture, Rural Develop6 ment, Food and Drug Administration, and related agen7 cies Appropriations Act, 1997 (110 Stat. 1590).

Æ
#### Wayne H.T. KANO; Patricia Kano, Trustee and Phillip Kau, Trustee, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL CONSUMER COOPERATIVE BANK, et al.; Frank L. Torres, Defendants-Appellees, and Jack L. Ayers, Jr. and Elsie M. Ayers, Third-party-plaintiffs-Appellees, George R. Madden, Jr., Third-party-defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-16754.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 18, 1994.

Riccio M. Tanaka, Honolulu, HI, for plaintiffs-appellants.

James N. Duca, Shelby Ann Floyd, Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing, Honolulu, HI, Frank Torres, pro se, for defendants-appellees.

Before: POOLE, WIGGINS, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opening brief filed on behalf of appellant violated Fed.RApp.P. 32(a) in that the lines were not double-spaced, but were spaced only one-and-one half spaces apart. Furthermore, the footnotes were of a typeface much smaller than that permitted by the rule, and contained approximately eight lines per inch as opposed to six lines per inch in a normal single-spaced format. We estimate that the opening brief was the equivalent of at least sixty-five pages in length, far exceeding the fifty-page limit.

Counsel for appellant took full responsibility for the form of the brief. However, it is apparent from the reply brief filed by counsel that he knows what the spacing requirements are, even though the footnotes in the reply brief also do not comply with Rule 32. Consequently, we impose sanctions against counsel for the appellant in the amount of $1,500. *See Adriana Intern. Corp. v. Thoeren,*913 F.2d 1406, 1417 (9th Cir.1990), *cert. denied,*498 U.S. 1109, 111 S.Ct. 1019, 112 L.Ed.2d 1100 (1991) (imposing sanctions for failure to comply with Fed.RApp.P. 32(a)); *900
      *see also*28 U.S.C. 1927 (authorizing sanctions for failure to comply with rules governing form of briefs). The court acknowledges payment of the sanction.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

s0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141901 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141901 

 COA: 299119 

 Wayne CC: 09-024949-FC 

LESLIE EUGENE TACKETT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration

Mr. David M. McDonald VP, General Counsel Aeronautical Engineers, Inc. 7765 Northwest 54th Street Miami, Florida 33166

DearMr. McDonald: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, Washington 98057-3356

This is inregard to your petition letter dated August 22, 2014, inwhich yourequested exemption from the requirements of§§ 25.785G), 25.812(e), 25.855(a), 25.857(e), 25.1447(c)(1), and 25.1449 ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations. The exemption, if granted, would allowthe carriage ofup to three non-crewmembers (commonly referred to as supernumeraries) in an area aft ofthe flight deck and forward ofthe 9Gbulkhead on Bombardier CRJ200 (CL-600-2819) freighter conversions to attendto special cargo. Your request was placed inthe Department ofTransportation's Federal DocketManagement System (Regulations.gov) and assigned DocketNo. FAA-2014-0636.

In ourletter dated September 8, 2014, we informed you that we were inthe process of reviewing your request and that we would contact you ifwe needed additional information. This is to notify youthat in order to make a decision on your request, we do require additional information. Therefore, please provide detailed informationto help us understand the following issues:

1. Aeronautical Engineers, Inc. (AEI) is requesting that up to three supernumeraries (meeting the requirements of§ 121.583) be allowed to occupy an area aft ofthe flight deck and forward ofthe 9Gbulkhead ("supernumerary area"). However, in the CL-600-2819, there is only room for two seats in the supernumerary area. Please clarify whether AEI intends to include up to three supernumeraries inthe supernumerary area or ifone ofthe supernumeraries will be seated in the flight deck. For your information, anyone seated inthe flight deck area does not require an exemption.

2. The supporting information inyourpetition describes how some operators ofAEI freighters needto be able to carry supernumeraries to assist with special cargo. Does AEI intend to allow access to the Class E cargo compartment during flight?3. The "Related regulations" section (page 2) ofyour petition lists §121.285 (carriage ofcargo in passenger compartments). Please explain your intent for including this reference in your request.

Pleaseprovide the requested additional information within 30 days ofthe date ofthis letter by submitting it to the established docket (DocketNo. FAA-2014-0636). Ifthe information is not submitted within thattimeframe, we will cease work onthe project with no further correspondence to you. Please note that work will only resume when we receive your additional information, addressed to the established docket on Regulations.gov.

Should youhave any questions or concerns regarding your petition orthe petition process, please contact Mr. Alan Sinclair at (425) 227-2195 orAlan.Sinclair@faa.gov.
Sincerely,

Suzanne asterson Manager, Airframe & Cabin Safety Transport Standards Staff 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF POST PROPERTIES, INC. FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000903127
<NAME> POST PROPERTIES INC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      22,502,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                   2,255,074,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             247,148,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,066,713,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    800,008,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                       380,000
<OTHER-SE>                               1,051,256,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,066,713,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           298,866,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              153,745,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          31,297,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            102,405,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         77,477,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                77,477,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18
        

</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1829

To prohibit the purchase of foreign beef by a school participating in the

school lunch, school breakfast, or child care food program, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 4, 1996

Mr. PRESSLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To prohibit the purchase of foreign beef by a school participating in the school lunch, school breakfast, or child

care food program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMERICAN BEEF IN CHILD NUTRITION PRO4 GRAMS.

5 The National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et

6 seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 1829 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 28. AMERICAN BEEF IN CHILD NUTRITION PRO2 GRAMS.

3 ‘‘A school or service institution in the continental

4 United States participating in the school lunch program,

5 the school breakfast program under section 4 of the Child

6 Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1773), or the child care

7 food program under section 17 may not purchase beef or

8 beef food-products produced outside the United States for

9 use in carrying out the program.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 12



FIRST REPUBLIC PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION

(A Majority Owned Subsidiary of First Republic Bank)



STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                                  |  | Quarter Ended September 30, |       |   | Nine MonthsEnded September 30, |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ----- | - | ------------------------------ | -
|                                                  |  | 2003                        |       |   | 2002                           |  
|                                                  |  | ($ in thousands)            |      
|I.     Earnings:                                  |  |                             |       |   |                                |  
|Net income                                        |  | $                           | 4,135 |   |                                | $
|Fixed charges excluding preferred stock dividends |  |                             |      |   |                                |  
|                                                  |  |                             |       |   |                                |  
|Earnings before fixed charges                     |  | $                           | 4,135 |   |                                | $
|                                                  |  |                             |       |   |                                |  
|II.     Fixed charges:                            |  |                             |       |   |                                |  
|Preferred stock dividends                         |  | $                           | 3,563 |   |                                | $
|                                                  |  |                             |       |   |                                |  
|III.    Ratios of earnings to fixed charges       |  |                             | 1.16  | x |                                |  
|                                                  |  |                             |       |   |                                |
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 20, 2016

No . 04

- 16

- 00633

- CR

Gabriel Antonio VALVERDE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR4166W Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on November 21, 2016 . The appellant’s first motion for extension of time was granted, extending the deadline for filing the brief to December 21, 2016 . On December 19, 2016 , the appellant filed a motion requesting an additional extension of time to file the brief until January 21, 2017 , for a total extension of sixty days. The motion is GRANTED. THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE APPELLANT WILL BE GRANTED . The Appellant’s brief must be filed by January 2 3 , 2017

.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 20th day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court