alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Fidelity Logo)
    
    Press Release
 Fidelity National Information Services , Inc. Completes Spin-off of
Lender Processing Services, Inc.
 JACKSONVILLE, Fla  
  About Fidelity National Information Services  ®




---



##### 



About
Lender Processing Services
**EXHIBIT99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarterended June 30, 2002, I, Thomas J. Sherman, Chief Financial Officer of CoastBancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           the information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30,2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Coast Bancorp

 

Dated:  November 14, 2002

 
|   | /s/ Thomas J. Sherman   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |                    |
|   | THOMAS J. SHERMAN       |
|   |                    |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          10,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  463,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,160,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,173,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             495,304,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      235,902,000
<BONDS>                                    182,202,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        48,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  72,986,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               495,304,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,426,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,318,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,323,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,084,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,701,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,848,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,853,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,853,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 September 10, 2008
 QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
  California
(State or Other Jurisdiction 
of Incorporation)
    
    001-14758
(Commission File Number)
    
    33-0476164
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)3260 Whipple Road Union City, California
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    94587
(Zip Code)
 (510) 400-0700
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the
Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal OfficersItem 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEXHIBIT 99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Principal Officers
      
 Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d) Exhibits.
 Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit Description99.1
    
    Press release issued by Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated
as of September 11, 2008.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Date: September 12, 2008
    QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.By:
    /s/ Gary M. SawkaGary M. SawkaSenior Vice President of Finance, and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit No.
    
    Exhibit Description99.1
    
    Press release issued by Questcor Pharmaceuticals, Inc., dated as of September 11, 2008.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 5893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01784]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Notice of Board Meeting

DATES: February 2, 2024, at 11:00 a.m.

ADDRESSES: 77 K Street NE, Washington, DC 20002.

Status: Closed to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of 
External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Board Meeting Agenda

Closed Session

    1. Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B).
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1).

    Dated: January 25, 2024.
Dharmesh Vashee,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-01784 Filed 1-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
## IR

Sanitized
1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-3135

___________ James Hedman Clark, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Tom A. Mickes, former SSD attorney; * The Law Firm, formerly known as * [UNPUBLISHED] Mickes, Tueth, Kenney, Cooper, * Mohan & Jackstadt; Special School * District; Francis Howell School * District, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 11, 2007 Filed: December 27, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. James Hedman Clark appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Upon de novo review, see Reis v. Walker , 491 F.3d 868, 870 (8th Cir. 2007), we agree with the district court th at Clark failed to st ate a claim upon which-2- relief could be granted. A ccordingly, we affirm. See8th Cir. R. 47B. We also grant appellees’ motions to strike, and we deny Clark’s pending motions.

______________________________
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star e Media Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ghaby ("Gabriel") Nassar, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  
 Dated: September 8, 2003
/s/ Gabriel NassarBy: Ghaby ("Gabriel") NassarIts: Chief Executive Officer 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Star e Media Corporation and will be retained by Star e Media Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 12

FIRST REPUBLIC PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of First Republic Bank)

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                 |  |                                                   |  |                             |       |   |                           |      |       |   |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|---------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ----- | - | ------------------------- | ---- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | - |  | - | ----- | -
|                 |  |                                                   |  | Three Months Ended June 30, |       |   | Six Months Ended June 30, |     
|($ in thousands) |  | 2007                                              |  |                             | 2006  |   |                           | 2007 |       |   | 2006 |  
|I.               |  | Earnings:                                         |  |                             |       |   |                           |      |       |   |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|                 |  | Net income                                        |  | $                           | 4,911 |   |                           | $    | 4,466 |   |      | $ | 9,828 |   |  | $ | 8,798 |  
|                 |  | Fixed charges excluding preferred stock dividends |  |                             |      |   |                           |      |      |   |      |   |      |   |  |   |      |  
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                             |       |   |                           |      |       |   |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|                 |  | Earnings before fixed charges                     |  | $                           | 4,911 |   |                           | $    | 4,466 |   |      | $ | 9,828 |   |  | $ | 8,798 |  
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                             |       |   |                           |      |       |   |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|II.              |  | Fixed charges:                                    |  |                             |       |   |                           |      |       |   |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|                 |  | Preferred stock dividends                         |  | $                           | 3,541 |   |                           | $    | 3,563 |   |      | $ | 7,104 |   |  | $ | 7,126 |  
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                             |       |   |                           |      |       |   |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |  
|III.             |  | Ratios of earnings to fixed charges               |  |                             | 1.39  | x |                           |      | 1.25  | x |      |   | 1.38  | x |  |   | 1.23  | x
|                 |  |                                                   |  |                             |       |   |                           |      |       |   |      |   |       |   |  |   |       |
RE: NELCO Products

Rick Lee t

o

: Shaheerah Kelly 02/16/2010 11:18 AM

History: This message has been forwarded.

Hi Kelly,

Here, it is the permit (see attached). The evaluation was attached in an earlier email.

Please let me know if you need anything else.

Rick Lee Air Quality Engineer South Coast AQMD Team B 909-396-2629 909-396-3350 (fax) rlee@aqmd.gov

From: Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:52 A M To: Rick Lee Subject: NELCO Products

Hi, Rick.

As I mentioned to you one the phone this morning, I am seeking information about the NOx BACT determination for the forced circulation heater at NELCO products. Below is the BACT determination that was in the CARB and SCAQMD databases. It would be helpful if you could provide me with the current permit (ATC or PTO) and engineering evaluation or similar document that describes the operation of the forced circulation heater. Please let me know.

NELCO Products Unit = Forced circulation heater, Natural gas fuel, Ultra LNB for NOx, 19 mmbtu/hr NOx = 12 ppmvd at 3% O2 CO = 50 ppmvd at 3% O2

Thank you!

************************************ Shaheerah Kelly Air Division (AIR-3) U S EPA Region 9 75 Hawthorne StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156 Fax: 415-947-3579

email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2018

No. 04-18-00761-CR

Jeffery John ROMERO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-1680-CR-B

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for leave to file a late docketing statement is GRANTED.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 30002

TAYLOR CARLISLE, individually and as Representative Member of a Class; EMILE HERON, individually and as Representative Member of a Class,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants

v. TRACY MUSSAL, as Program Supervisor of the 24th Judicial District Court Drug Court Intensive Probation Program; KEVIN THERIOT, Probation Coordinator of the 24th Judicial District Court Drug Court Intensive Probation Program; KRISTEN BECNEL, as Administrator of the 24th Judicial District Court Drug Court Intensive Probati on Program,

Defendants

- Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:16

- CV

- 3767

Before HAYNES, GRAVES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
Plaintiff

- Appellants, two former participants in Jefferson Parish ’s Drug Court, brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They alleged members of the Drug Court, acting in their official and individual capacities,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C I R . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 14, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-30002 Document: 00515076271 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2019No. 18

- 30002

2 violated their constitutional rights to due process by jailing them for technical program violations without a hearing and for giving them “flat time” sentences that did not allow the ability to earn credit for good behavior. The district court dismissed the claims against three Defendants, a Drug Court administrator, a Drug Court supervisor, and Drug Court probation offic er, and entered a final judgment in their favor. We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the applicable law, and the relevant portions of the record. We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court for the reasons explained in the district court’s orders date d May 23, 2017, August 1, 2017, October 31, 2017 , and December 19, 2017

. Case: 18-30002 Document: 00515076271 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6150

ALPHONSO HAYNESWORTH, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

CORRECT CARE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS; SOUTH CAROLINA 

DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, SvpTp; C. KUNKLE; G. ARNOLD; 

M. MCDUFFIE; NFN ANDERSON; T. JONES; C. GOODWIN; NFN 

EUGENIANO; NFN MCGRIFFIN; C. JACOME; TIMOTHY J. BUDZ, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (2:17-cv-03247-CMC) 

Submitted: June 24, 2019 Decided: August 6, 2019

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Alphonso Haynesworth, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Victor Gende, Ryan Joseph Patane, 

SWEENY, WINGATE & BARROW, PA, Columbia, South Carolina; Kyle David 

McGann, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., Ronald Keith Taylor, Jr., MCKAY FIRM, P.A., 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. 
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
3

PER CURIAM: 

Alphonso Haynesworth appeals from the district court’s order adopting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge in part, granting summary judgment to 

Defendants on his constitutional claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012), declining 

to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his South Carolina state law claims, and 

dismissing those claims without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Haynesworth v. Correct Care Recovery Sols., No. 2:17-cv-03247-CMC (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 

2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Albert ELLSWORTH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-5069.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 27, 2003.

Neal Kirkpatrick, Asst. U.S. Attorney, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Joseph Albert Ellsworth, #381854, Stringtown, OK, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This case is before the court on Joseph A. Ellsworth’s application for a certificate of appealability (“COA”) and motion to proceed on appeal *in forma pauperis.*Ellsworth seeks a COA so that he can appeal the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (providing that no appeal may be taken from “the final order in a proceeding under section 2255” unless the movant first obtains a COA). In denying Ellsworth’s motion, the district court concluded that all but three of Ellsworth’s claims were procedurally barred by his failure to raise them on appeal or waived by his guilty plea. As to the three claims that it addressed on the merits, the district court concluded that Ellsworth had failed to show that his attorney provided ineffective assistance at sentencing, had failed to demonstrate that his guilty plea was unknowing or involuntary, and had failed to show that the government had breached the plea agreement.

To be entitled to a COA, Ellsworth must make a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” *See id.*§ 2253(c)(2). Ellsworth can make the requisite showing by demonstrating that “reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000). Upon consideration of Ells-worth’s application for a COA and appellate brief, and *de novo*review of the district court’s order and the entire record on appeal, this court concludes that Ellsworth has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right for substantially those reasons set out in the district court’s order dated May 2, 2002. Considerations of judicial economy counsel against repeating the thorough and comprehensive analysis of Ellsworth’s petition set out in the district court order. Accordingly, this court GRANTS Ellsworth permission to proceed *in forma pauperis,*
      *512DENIES his application for a COA, and DISMISSES this appeal.

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
# WEST VIRG I NIA

SECRETARY OF STATE

NATALIE E. TENNANT 

# ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DIVISION Do Not Mark In Th i s Box F o rm # 3

___________________________ ......1.... --- ' - " '. ;; ... ., _ . - __ --- : - - --'-.,........ . . . ,. . . , - . - ,: , .., ' - - + T _ \ __ ' - 1 .- \_ , ._i I ,I' \ . J! \J l r\ L i \. ; 

### NOTICE OF AGENCY APPROVA L OF A PROPOSED RULE AND FILING WIT H THE LEGISLAT I VE RULE - MAKING REV I EW COMMITTEE AG ENC Y : __ WV

__ D_ ep_artm_ e_n t_ o _f

E_n_Vlf _ ' o nm_e_n_t al_P_f

O _te_ Cti _ 'o _n ., D_i_v is_io _n_ o _f

Air _ ' _Q_u_ali_'ty T IT LE NUM B E R: __ 45

_ C I TE AUT HOR ITY : W_ , _V_a , _ C _ od_e_§ 2_ 2 _ - S _ - 4 _ A MEN D MEN T TO AN EX I ST I NG RULE : YES ~ N O _ IF YES , SE R IES NUM B E R OF R ULE B E I NG AMEN D E D : __ 4 _ SC .. ; . . SR_l_4 _ T I TLE OF R ULE B EING A M EN D E D: Permits for C onstru c ti on and M ajor Modi f ication of Majo r Statio nary So u rc es for th e Preve n ti on of Sign i fi c ant D e te rio ratio n o f A if Qu al ity IF N O , S ERI E S N U MB E R O F R U L E B EING PR O PO S ED : _ TITLE O F R ULE B EING P R O POS E D: _ THE A B OV E PROPO SE D LE G ISLA T I VE R ULE H AVIN G G O N E TO A P U B LIC HE ARING ORA PUB LIC C O MME NT PER I OD IS H E R E B Y A P PROVED B Y T H E PROM UL GA TI NG A GE NCY F OR FILING WIT H THE S E CR E TAR Y O F STA T E AN D THE L E G I SL AT IV E RULE-M A KIN G R EV IE W C O MMITTEE FO R THEI R R E V I E W .
**Exhibit32.1**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, I, Theodore R. Maloney, certify that:

 

1.             TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”)of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of MediCor.

 

Date: February 11, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Theodore R. Maloney |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Theodore R. Maloney     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |