alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                          42,406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,366
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,679
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,722
<PP&E>                                         837,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                 327,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 615,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,328
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,151
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   615,728
<SALES>                                        258,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               258,625
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  241,670
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,006
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                       435
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                629
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       629
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Mack R. GIBSON, Appellant, v. Constance C. REESE, Sued as Constance Reese, Warden, Appellee.

No. 02-3030.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 10, 2003.

Before BYE, FAGG and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Mack R. Gibson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We affirm.

In February 1994, Gibson was arrested for selling cocaine. His parole was revoked, and he was imprisoned from the date of his arrest until February 20, 1996, his mandatory release date. Meanwhile, in November 1995, the government indicted him on two counts of drug trafficking for selling the cocaine; after a jury trial, Gibson was sentenced on October 2, 1996, to 120 months imprisonment. The judgment stated this sentence was concurrent with any remaining parole-violation time, and recommended that Gibson receive credit for time served since December 13, 1995. The Bureau of Prisons (BOP), however, gave Gibson credit only from February 20, 1996. Gibson filed his section 2241 petition, seeking credit for time he served before that date, and asserting various challenges to the validity of his sentence.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b), the BOP could give Gibson credit on his instant sentence only for time not credited towards a prior sentence, and the time he spent in custody before February 20, 1996, had been credited to his parole-violation sentence. Further, the BOP had authority to determine the amount of credit Gibson was to receive, and was not bound by the sentencing recommendation. *See United States v. Wilson,*503 U.S. 329, 335, 112 S.Ct. 1351, 117 L.Ed.2d 593 (1992). Gibson’s challenges to the validity of his sentence — as opposed to its execution — must be brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. *See Matheny v. Morrison,*307 F.3d 709, 711 (8th Cir.2002).

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Form approved. OMB No. 2070-0060, 2070-0174

United States 

### Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 

# Formulator’s Exemption Statement (40 CFR 152.85)

EPA File Symbol/Registration Number

Product Name Applicant’s Name and Address

Date of Confidential Statement of Formula (EPA Form 8570-4)

As an authorized representative of the applicant for regist ration of the product identified above, I certify that:

(1) This product contains the following active ingredient(s):

(2) Of these, each active ingr edient listed in paragraph (4) is present solely as the result of the use of that active ingredi ent in the manufacturing, formulation or repackaging another product whic h contains that active ingredient whic h is registered under FIFRA Section 3, is purchased by us from another person and meets the requirements of 40 CFR section 158.50(e)(2) or (3).

(3) Indicate by checking (A) or (B) below which paragraph applies:



#  (A) An accurate Confidential Statement of Formula (EPA FORM 8570-4) for the above identified product is attached to this statement. That formula statement indicates, by company name, registration number, and product nam e, the source of the active i ngredient(s) listed in paragraph (1). OR



#  (B) The Confidential Statement of Formula (CSF)(EPA Form 8570-4) referenced above and on file with the EPA is complete, current , an accurate and contains the information required on the current CSF.

(4) The following active ingredients in this product qualify for the formulator’s exemption.



### Source

Active Ingredient Product Name Registration Number

Signature Name and Title Date

EPA Form 8570-27 (Rev. 06-2004) Copy 1 – EPA Copy 2 - Applicant copy

# Paperwork Reduction Act Notice

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1.5. hours per response, including familiarization with the form, organizing the necessary information, and completing the form. Send any comments regarding the burden estimate or any other as pect of this collection of information to: Director, Collection Strategies Division (2822T), U.S. Envir onmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20460. Do not send the completed form to this address.

EPA Form 8570-27 (Rev. 06-2004) Reverse Copy 1 - EPA Copy 2 - Applicant copy
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW  ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned constitutes and appoints
Ernest  C. Garcia, Gregory B. Sullivan, Steven T. Darak and Steven P. Johnson,
and  each  of  them,  his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full
power  of  substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead,  in  any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the  fiscal  year  ended December 31, 1996, for filing with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  by  Ugly  Duckling  Corporation, a Delaware corporation,
together  with  any and all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  granting to such attorneys-in-fact and
agents,  and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every  act  and  thing  requisite  and  necessary  to be done in and about the
premises,  as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person,  hereby  ratifying  and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     DATED:  February  14th,  1997


                              /s/  John  N.  MacDonough

STATE  OF  ARIZONA    )
                      )  ss.
County  of  Maricopa  )


On  this 14th day of February, 1997, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,
personally  appeared  John  N.  MacDonough, known to me to be the person whose
name  is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed
the  same  for  the  purposes  therein  contained.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I  hereunto  set  my  hand  and  official  seal.




                              /s/  Mary  E.  Reiner
                              Notary  Public


My  commission  expires:    12/18/2000                    {official  seal}










<PAGE>  125
Exhibit 10.1
 STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 Agreement Company Shareholder
 RECITALS
  Repurchased Shares Repurchase Price
  AGREEMENT
 Repurchase
  Deliveries




---



##### 



Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Shareholder . Shareholder hereby
represents, warrants and covenants to the Company as follows:
 Legal Power
 Title to Shares
 Investment Representations
 Tax Matters
 Company Representations.
 Legal Power
 Accounting Treatment
 2




---



##### 



Miscellaneous
 Entire Agreement
 Governing Law and Venue
 Attorneys Fees
 Counterparts
   
 /s/ Don BaileyDon Bailey
President and Chief Executive Officer
  /s/ Roberto Carlos de Castro AbrevBy: Roberto Carlos de Castro Abrev
Its: Director
 3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
  Company
 Dated: September 3rd, 2008
    [SIGNATURE BLOCK] A-1
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

*CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350*

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe quarterly period ended January 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Blair P. Mowery,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated: | March 22,  2004 | By     |   | /s/ Blair P.  Mowery                   |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   |            |   |   | Blair P.  Mowery                       |
|   |            |   |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
First Amendment to 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.3 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 ATWOOD OCEANICS, INC. 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Atwood Oceanics, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”), has established and maintains the Atwood Oceanics, Inc. Amended and Restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.1 of the Plan, the Company has the right to amend the Plan at any
time by action of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), subject to prior approval by the Company’s stockholders to the extent such approval is determined to be required by applicable legal and/or stock exchange
requirements; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to remove the requirement that both the Company and the
participant execute the applicable award agreement; and 
 WHEREAS, this amendment is not a material modification that is
subject to prior stockholder approval; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows: 

1. Section 2.4 of the Plan is hereby replaced with the following sentence: 

“‘Award Notice’ means any written notice of grant that establishes the terms, conditions, restrictions, and/or
limitations applicable to an Award in addition to those established by the Plan and by the Committee’s exercise of its administrative powers.” 
 2. The fourth sentence of Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby replaced with the following sentence: 
 “Each grant of an Option shall be evidenced by an Award Notice which shall set forth the terms and conditions of such Option and be in such form as the Committee may from time to time approve subject
to the requirements of Section 5.2.” 
 3. The fifth sentence of Section 7.1 of the Plan is hereby replaced with
the following sentence: 
 “Each grant of a SAR shall be evidenced by an Award Notice which shall set forth the terms and
conditions of such SAR and be in such form as the Committee may from time to time approve, subject to the requirements of the Plan.” 
 4. The second sentence of Section 8.1 of the Plan is hereby replaced with the following sentence: 
 “Each Award of Performance Units shall be evidenced by an Award Notice which shall set forth the terms and conditions of such Performance Units and be in such form as the Committee may from time to
time approve, subject to the requirements of Section 8.2.” 







 5. The term “Award Agreement” is hereby replaced with the term “Award
Notice” throughout the Plan. 
 This First Amendment to the Plan shall be effective as of the date it is originally
approved by the Board. 
  

			
	Attested to by the Secretary of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. as adopted by the Board of Directors effective as of the
9th day of December, 2011
		
	By:	 	/s/ Walter A. Baker
		 	 Vice President, General Counsel
 and Corporate Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5156 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5156

To protect publicly owned trees from unnecessary destruction, maiming, 
                 or alteration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2018

    Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself and Mr. Cicilline) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To protect publicly owned trees from unnecessary destruction, maiming, 
                 or alteration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Public Trees Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION.

    Section 131 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(u) Protection of Publicly Owned Plants.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), an 
        individual or entity (including a governmental entity) directly 
        or indirectly may not modify, remove, or pile materials about 
        any tree, plant, or other vegetation that is partially or fully 
        on a public right-of-way adjacent to a highway of the 
        Interstate System or the primary system if a purpose of such 
        modification, removal, or piling of materials is to erect, 
        maintain, repair, or improve the visibility (including the 
        future visibility) of privately owned commercial outdoor 
        advertising.
            ``(2) Exception.--Paragraph (1) does not apply if a purpose 
        of the modification, removal, or piling of materials described 
        in paragraph (1) is to improve or maintain safety.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
       
<S>                                    <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<CASH>                                   4,362,938
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              817,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                44,703
<INVENTORY>                                950,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         6,565,928
<PP&E>                                  17,744,643
<DEPRECIATION>                             337,503
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          24,270,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    6,020,826
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                              10,891,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            24,270,169
<SALES>                                  7,931,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         7,931,149
<CGS>                                    5,312,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            5,312,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           801,560
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         206,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,639,544)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,639,544)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,639,544)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.51)
        



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                               CONSENT OF COUNSEL


             Moskowitz Altman & Hughes LLP hereby consents to the use of its
name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the Prospectus forming a part of the
Registration Statement and in any amendment thereto.

                                         MOSKOWITZ ALTMAN & HUGHES LLP



                                         By: /s/ John J. Hughes
                                            ------------------------------
                                            John J. Hughes, Jr. Esq.,
                                            a Partner



New York, New York
December 18, 1996



                                       21
#### Ex parte James McDONALD, alias James Hamilton.

No. 36726.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 1, 1964.

Harkness & Friedman, by Harry Friedman, Texarkana, for relator.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered in a habeas corpus proceeding remanding the petitioner to custody for extradition.

Governor Connally honored the requisition of the Governor of Arkansas for the petitioner’s arrest and return to that state to answer the charge of uttering a forged instrument.

The information, as well as the supporting papers, clearly shows that the petitioner is not substantially charged with “uttering a forged instrument.” The charge against the petitioner is violation of the Arkansas Hot Check Law, which is quite similar to the Texas Statute relating to the uttering of a worthless check.

The judgment remanding the petitioner is reversed and the petitioner is ordered discharged.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.7



                              AMENDMENT NO. THREE
                              POST PROPERTIES, INC.
                               EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN

         Pursuant to the power reserved in ss. 17 of the Post Properties, Inc.
Employee Stock Plan, ss. 7.3, Grants to Directors, is hereby amended to delete
ss. 7.3 in its entirety and to substitute the following for such section:

        "Each Director automatically shall be granted (without any further
         action on the part of the Committee) a NQO under this Plan as of the
         first day he serve as such to purchase the number of shares of Stock
         determined by dividing $10,000 by the Fair Market Value of a share of
         Stock on the date of grant and rounding down to the nearest whole
         number. Such grant shall be made at an Option Price equal to the Fair
         Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of such grant. Thereafter,
         each Director who is serving as such on December 31 of each calendar
         year and who has served as such for more than one full year
         automatically shall be granted (without any further action on the part
         of the Committee), as of such December 31, a NQO under this Plan to
         purchase 1,000 shares of Stock. Such grant shall be made at an Option
         Price equal to the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the date of
         such grant. Each NQO granted under this Plan to a Director shall be
         evidenced by an Option Certificate, shall be exercisable in full upon
         grant and shall expire 90 days after a Director ceases to serve as such
         or, if earlier, on the tenth anniversary of the date of the grant of
         the NQO. A NQO granted to a Director under this Plan shall conform in
         all other respects to the terms and conditions of a NQO under this
         Plan, and no Director shall be eligible to receive an Option under this
         Plan except as provided in this ss. 7.3. A grant of a NQO to a Director
         under this ss. 7.3 is intended to allow such Director to be a
         "disinterested person" within the meaning of Rule 16b-3, and all NQOs
         granted to Directors as well as this ss. 7.3 shall be construed to
         effect such intent."

         This Amendment to the Post Properties, Inc. Employee Stock Plan shall
be effective as of the date that the Board of Directors of Post Properties, Inc.
adopted the Amendment to the Plan.

                                  POST PROPERTIES, INC.



                                  By:  /s/ Sherry Cohen
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       Sherry W. Cohen
                                       Senior Vice President and Secretary

                                  Date: October 30, 1997