alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
American General Hospitality Corporation on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-33007 and
333-36127) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-08845, 333-08841 and 333-45329) as
amended of our report dated January 26, 1998, except for Note 11, as to which
the date is March 16, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedules of American General Hospitality
Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the year ended December
31, 1997 and the period from July 31, 1996 (inception of operations) through
December 31, 1996, and our report dated January 30, 1998, except for Note 6, as
to which the date is March 16, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of AGH Leasing, L.P. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the
year ended December 31, 1997 and the period from July 31, 1996 (inception of
operations) through December 31, 1996, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A.     

    
                                       /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.     


Dallas, Texas
    
May 22, 1998
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 28, 2016

No. 04-16-00231-CV

Charles Edward REED Jr.; Amos E. Reed III, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of 

Delores Perrin; Curtis Cullen Smith, Trustee of the Laura Dossett Smith Family Trust; Et al.,

Appellants

v.

MALTSBERGER/STOREY RANCH, LLC; Storey Minerals, Ltd.; Tom O. Hanks; Karen R. 

Hanks; TK Hanks Royalties, LP,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-03-00057-CVL

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This court granted Appellees’ first motions for extension of time to file their briefs, and 

the briefs are due on October 31, 2016. Before the due date, Appellees filed unopposed second 

motions for extension of time to file their briefs until November 30, 2016, for a total extension of 

sixty-two days. 

Appellees’ motions are GRANTED. Appellees’ briefs are due on November 30, 2016. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d). Any further motion for extension of time to file Appellees’ briefs

will be disfavored. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of October, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of MeriStar Hospitality
Corporation (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                 
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Date:    March 16, 2005 |  | /s/ Donald D. Olinger           
|                        |  | Donald D. Olinger               
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer         
|                        |  | MeriStar Hospitality Corporation
Jet Aviation Flight Services, Inc. | Aircraft Management | Charter Services | Flight Support

112 Charles A. Lindbergh Drive | Teterboro Airport | Teterboro, NJ 07608 | USA

Tel. +1 201 462 4433 | Fax +1 201 625 6335 | www.jetaviation.com

JET AVIATION FLIGHT SERVICES, INC.

KKVA618M

112 Charles Lindbergh Drive

Teterboro, NJ 07608

317-839-0192

Mr. John Ho / Mr. Watson Joseph

FAA FSDO-25

Park 80 West Plaza One 

150 Pehle Drive, Suite 003

Saddle Brook, NJ 07663

April 9, 2014

Dear Mr. Ho and Mr. Watson;

Subject: Use of Exemption FAA-2013-1047

We are requesting that you accept this letter as notification for use of exemption FAA-2013-1047

for the below aircraft which are listed in Table of Affected Aircraft within the exemption.

F900LX SN 261 (N261CH)

F900EX EASy SN 199 (N918JM)

JAFS also acknowledges the conditions and limitations listed in the exemption as the basis for 

continued operation of the airplane until modifications are completed.

JAFS shall also file a copy of this letter within Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-1047.

JAFS shall also retain a copy of the exemption with the DFDR correlation documentation as 

specified in 135.152 until the airplane has been modified pursuant to the exemption.

JAFS understand we must provide monthly updates to our PAI until modifications are completed 

and each aircraft listed above are incompliance with 14 CFR 135.156(d). This notification of 

schedule shall follow in a separate letter.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Darrell Hunter

Director of Quality Assurance
333	Exemption	Request

I	am	writing	to	seek	permission	to	fly	a	UAS	for	the	purpose	of	capturing	video	

content	that	will	used	for	marketing	the	city	of	Indianapolis	for	leisure	travel	and	

convention	sales.

 With	an	understanding	that	said	UAS	will	not	fly	over	200	feet,	we	feel	that	

there	is no	concern	over	NAS	intrusion.

 With	an	understanding	of	privacy	laws	we	understand	that	UAS	shall	not	fly	

in	or	record	areas	where	there	is	a	reasonable	expectation	of	privacy.

Aerials	captured	will	have	a	direct	economic	impact	upon	the	city	of	Indianapolis	

and	enhance	our	ability	to	remain	competitive,	thus	presenting	a	legitimate	business	

use	case.

UAS	Model:	DJI	Phantom	2

Safety	Features:

 GPS	Navigation

 Return	Home

 Live	Feed	to	Controller

Thank	you	for	your	consideration.

All	the	best,

Jeff	Robinson

Director	of	Marketing

Visit	Indy

200	South	Capitol	Avenue,	Suite	300

Indianapolis,	IN	46225-1063

jrobinson@visitindy.com

317-262-8251
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an exhibit
          the Annual Servicing Report of Company's Independent
          Public Accountants. 


                  Commission File Nos. 0-20909


            REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1 
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Servicer of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Servicer's charter)


            DELAWARE                      Not Applicable         
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Servicer)        Number of Registrant


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070     
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Servicer)


Servicer's telephone number, including area code  (847) 564-5000 











<PAGE>








                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
amendment to be signed on behalf of the Revolving Home Equity Loan
Trust 1996-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Servicer of and on behalf of the

                       REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  May 1, 1998            By:/s/John W. Blenke              
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary
















U:\WP\HFS088\95-10K\RHEL96-1.AMD


<PAGE>





                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit                                      Page No.

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants          4
               Annual Servicing Report dated January 21,
               1998.
Order filed July 3, 2018. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00069-CR

____________

LAWRENCE LANELL PARKER, II, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 264th District Court

Bell County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 76499

ORDER

The clerk’s record in this appeal was filed with this court on December 22, 

2017. Our review has determined that a relevant item has been omitted from the 

clerk’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain the PreSentence Investigation Report.

The Bell County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record, on or before July 17, 2018, containing the Pre-Sentence Investigation 

Report. 
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                                 Certification

   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Finance,
L.L.C. and Nexstar Finance, Inc. (together, the "Company"), hereby certifies
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June
30, 2001 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                   <C>
Dated: May 20, 2003                                   /s/  G. Robert Thompson
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      G. Robert Thompson
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
</TABLE>

   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6602
KEVIN ALEXANDER MOSS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LLOYD L. WATERS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-2884-S) Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 12, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Alexander Moss, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing most of the claims in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K
for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin Salinas, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 27, 2009



/s/ Martin Salinas, Jr.Martin Salinas, Jr.Chief Financial Officer




|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF PRINTRAK INTERNATIONAL INC.

As of March 31, 1997, Printrak International Inc. (the "Company") had one
subsidiary, Printrak Limited. On May 7, 1997, the Company acquired TFP, Inc. a
South Carolina corporation, which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company. On September 9, 1997, SunRise Imaging, a California corporation, was
acquired and became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. On December 1,
1997, the Company established Printrak International Pty Ltd, in Australia, as a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. On December 11, 1998, the Company
established Printrak de Argentina S.R.L, in Argentina, as a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company.
Exhibit 10.1


 





AMENDMENT
TO MASTER EXCHANGE AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to the Master Exchange Agreement (this “Amendment”)
is effective as of March 3, 2017.


 


WHEREAS, Net Element, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), and Crede CG III, Ltd., an exempted company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda
(the “Creditor”), are parties to that certain Master Exchange Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2016 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Creditor desire
to amend certain provisions of the Agreement, and Section 8(c) of the Agreement permits the Agreement to be amended by amended
in writing signed by the Company and by the Creditor.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
mutual covenants contained herein, the Company and the Creditor hereby agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:


 


1.                 
Recitals. All of the recitals contained herein are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this reference.


 


2.                 
Amendment. The first sentence in Section 1(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety by
deleting such second sentence and replacing it with the following:


 


“Subject to the provisions of Section
1(d), at any time or times from the date hereof up to August 31, 2017 (the “Outside Date”), the Creditor shall
be obligated to exchange upon the Company issuing an Exchange Notice (as defined below) the Tranche (in the amount specified in
the Exchange Notice representing a portion of the outstanding and unpaid Existing Debt into validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable
shares of Common Stock in accordance with Section 1(c), at the Exchange Rate (as defined below).”


 


3.                 
Limited Effect. Except as expressly amended and modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall continue to be, and
shall remain, in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


 


4.                 
Governing Law. This Amendment and the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be construed in accordance
with and governed by the internal laws of the State of New York.


 


5.                 
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts. Each counterpart shall
be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart
of a signature page of this Amendment in Portable Document Format (PDF) or by facsimile transmission shall be as effective as delivery
of a manually executed original counterpart of this Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this
Amendment have caused their names to be signed hereto by their respective officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date first
set forth above.


 


	 	NET ELEMENT, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/  Oleg Firer
	 	Name:   	Oleg Firer
	 	Title:	CEO
	 	 	 
	 	CREDE CG III, LTD.
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Terren Peizer
	 	Name:	Terren Peizer
	 	Title:	Managing Member
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128711 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128711 COA: 249187 Wayne CC: 02-014891-01 ANDRE CALWISE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ap ril 14, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | APPLETON PAPERS INC. |
|----------------------------------|----------------------|
|                             |                 |   |
| Dated:  August 9, 2010 |                 | /s/ Mark R. Richards  |
|                             | Name:                | Mark R. Richards |
|                             | Title:               | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2139

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of child safety

restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on commercial aircraft, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1996

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use

of child safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on commercial aircraft, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHILD SAFETY RESTRAINT SYSTEMS ON COM4 MERCIAL AIRCRAFT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 447 of title 49, United

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow7 ing new section:
2

•S 2139 IS

1 ‘‘§ 44724. Child safety restraint systems

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the

3 date of the enactment of this section, the Secretary of

4 Transportation shall issue regulations requiring the use

5 of child safety restraint systems that have been approved

6 by the Secretary on any aircraft operated by an air carrier

7 in providing interstate air transportation, intrastate air

8 transportation, or foreign air transportation.

9 ‘‘(b) AGE OR WEIGHT LIMITS.—The regulations is10 sued under this section shall establish age or weight limits

11 for children who use the child safety restraint systems.’’.

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis

13 for chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, is amend14 ed by adding at the end the following new item:

‘‘44724. Child safety restraint systems.’’.

15 SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD.

16 It is the sense of the Congress that the United States

17 representative to the International Civil Aviation Organi18 zation should seek an international standard to require

19 that passengers on a civil aviation aircraft be restrained—

20 (1) on takeoff and landing; and

21 (2) when directed by the captain of such air22 craft.

Æ
From: Matthew Todd < ToddM@api.org > To: Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Penny Lassiter/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Sent: 08/28/2012 09:17 AM Subject: Delayed Coker Emission Controls

Brenda,

Please see the attached letter regarding delayed coking units. Let me know if you’d like me to arrange further discussions with our coker experts following your review.

Thank you.

Matt

Matthew Todd Senior Policy Advisor API 202.682.8319

<< 2012 08 28 API Coker Letter to EPA Final.pdf >>
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



      In connection with the Quarterly report of Megola, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Gardner,
acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Joel Gardner
------------------------
     Joel Gardner
        CEO and CFO


     March 22, 2005