alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 08-0199

Standard Review Draft 03/17/2008

ENGINEER: Arnold PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: No Label: No

TLV/PEL:

CRSS (02/04/2008):
Chemical Name:

S-H20:

VP:
MW: 10000.00 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns) (02/05/2008): Migration to groundwater: Score is "U" PBT rating: P3B1T1 Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, XB Testing (Health testing desired) Eco: 1 Not Required, XB Testing (No eco testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW:STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 08-0199
1

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District

Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

_____________

No. 96-2220

_____________

Joe Brasfield, Sr., *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

State of Arkansas; Don Smith, *

Sheriff; Edgar Stain, Deputy; *

Larry Allen, Deputy; Steve *

Young, Deputy; Gibbs Ferguson; * Appeal from the United States

Arkansas State Plant Board; * District Court for the

Gerald King, Director of * Eastern District of Arkansas.

the State Plant Board; Charles *

Armstrong; Windy Spakes; Dan * [UNPUBLISHED]

Wicker; David Stubbs; *

E. N. Hill; Chip Hill; Bullocks *

Flying Service, also known *

as Southern Air; Blake *

Haynes; Isaiah Jackson; *

Rosemary Jackson; Joe James; *

Eddie Lee Phillips, ** Appellees. *

____________

 Submitted: December 6, 1996

 Filed: December 17, 1996 ____________

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Joe Brasfield, Sr., appeals the district court's1 dismissal of

his suit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Clean Air Act, 42
U.S.C. §§ 7402-7671q, for failure to state a claim. We have

reviewed the district court record, the parties' briefs, and the

additional pleadings filed by Brasfield, and conclude that the

district court's judgment is correct, as Brasfield's allegations

are insufficient as a matter of law to provide relief. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
TS – 10KK7G, Physical and Chemical Properties Worksheet, DSC Trace

Redacted
Exhibit 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference in the  registration  statements  No.
333-31229 and No. 333-73230 on Form S-8 of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. and
registration  statements  No.  333-88697,  No.  333-35634,  No.  333-53766,  No.
333-58568,   No.  333-67044,  and  No.  333-72166  on  Form  S-3  of  CollaGenex
Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. of our report dated  January 31,  2001,  except as to the
first  paragraph  of note  14,  which  is as of March  12,  2001 and the  second
paragraph  of note 14,  which is as of  March  19,  2001,  with  respect  to the
consolidated balance sheets of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 1999 and 2000,  and the related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2000, and the related  financial  statement
schedule,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2000 Annual  Report on Form
10-K/A of  CollaGenex  Pharmaceuticals,  Inc. Our report refers to the Company's
adoption of the  provisions of the Securities  and Exchange  Commission's  Staff
Accounting  Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue  Recognition in Financial  Statements" in
2000.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Princeton, New Jersey
January 2, 2002
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A


     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998


Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an exhibit
          the Annual Servicing Report of Company's Independent
          Public Accountants. 


                  Commission File Nos. 0-20909


            REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1 
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
(Servicer of the Trust)
(Exact name as specified in Servicer's charter)


            DELAWARE                      Not Applicable         
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Servicer)        Number of Registrant


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070     
(Address of principal executive offices of           (Zip Code)
Servicer)


Servicer's telephone number, including area code  (847) 564-5000 











<PAGE>








                           SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
amendment to be signed on behalf of the Revolving Home Equity Loan
Trust 1996-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Servicer of and on behalf of the

                       REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  May 4, 1998            By:/s/John W. Blenke              
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary
















U:\WP\HFS088\95-10K\RHEL96-1.AMD


<PAGE>



                            SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Servicer has duly caused this
amendment to be signed on behalf of the Revolving Home Equity Loan
Trust 1996-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.




                          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                         as Servicer of and on behalf of the

                       REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1
                                    (Registrant)




Date:  May 4, 1998            By:                             
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary
















U:\WP\HFS088\95-10K\RHEL96-1.AMD


                                 
<PAGE>



                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit                                      Page No.

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants          4
               Annual Servicing Report dated January 20, 1999.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Net Income Per Share

         Net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of
common and dilutive shares outstanding during the period. A reconciliation of
the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per-share computations
follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    YEARS ENDED MARCH 31,
                                         ------------------------------------------
                                             1999           2000          2001
                                         ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                                      <C>            <C>            <C>
BASIC
Numerator:

Net income                               $ 14,144,000   $ 20,876,000   $ 22,668,000
                                         ============   ============   ============

Denominator:

Weighted average common
   stock outstanding                       24,004,290     24,760,163     29,145,057
                                         ============   ============   ============

Net income per share                     $       0.59   $       0.84   $       0.78
                                         ============   ============   ============

DILUTED
Numerator:

Net income                               $ 14,144,000   $ 20,876,000   $ 22,668,000
                                         ============   ============   ============

Denominator:

Weighted average common                    24,004,290     24,760,163     29,145,057
   stock outstanding

Other Dilutive Securities:
Preferred stock                                73,260             --      3,750,000
Options and warrants using the
  treasury stock method                     2,798,652      2,977,053      3,293,736
                                         ------------   ------------   ------------
Weighted average shares outstanding        26,876,202     27,737,216     36,188,793
                                         ============   ============   ============

Net income per share                     $       0.53   $       0.75   $       0.63
                                         ============   ============   ============
</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29465]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Senior Executive Service; Performance Review Board

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Designation of Performance Review Board Chair.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the Performance Review Board Chair 
designee for the Department of Energy.

DATES: This appointment is effective as of September 30, 2011.

    Susan F. Beard

    Issued in Washington, DC, November 2, 2011.
Sarah J. Bonilla,
Director, Office of Human Capital Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-29465 Filed 11-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                               RIORDAN & MCKINZIE
                         A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
                       695 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1500
                         COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA  92626


                               January 29, 1997


                                                                       4-157-006

Data Processing Resources Corporation
4400 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 600
Newport Beach, California 92660

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        You have requested our opinion with respect to the 250,000 shares of
common stock of Data Processing Resources Corporation, a California corporation
(the "Company"), available for purchase under the Company's Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (the "Purchase  Plan Shares").

        The Purchase Plan Shares are the subject of a Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement"), to which this opinion is attached as
an exhibit, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Commission") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

        We have examined (i) the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as
amended and restated and currently in effect, (ii) the Company's Bylaws, as
amended to date, (iii) the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (iv) the Registration
Statement and (v) the originals or copies, certified to our satisfaction, of
such records, documents, certificates, memoranda and other instruments as in
our judgment are necessary or appropriate to enable us to render the opinion
expressed below.  We have also examined the records of corporate proceedings
taken in connection with the adoption of the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

        Based upon the foregoing examinations and subject to compliance with
the applicable state securities and "blue sky" laws, we are of the opinion that
the Purchase Plan Shares when offered, sold and paid for pursuant to the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, will be duly authorized, validly issued, fully
paid and non-assessable.

        We hereby consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                /s/ RIORDAN & McKINZIE
Not For Publication in West's Federal Reporter

Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 04-2378

JOSE L. CAMACHO,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO,

Respondent, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

[Hon. Jaime Pieras, II, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Boudin, Chief Judge,

Stahl, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Howard, Circuit Judge.

Jose L. Camacho Ramos on brief pro se.

Doraliz E. Ortiz-De-Leon, Assistant Solicitor General,

Salvador Antonetti-Stutts, Solicitor General, and Mariana D.

Negron-Vargas, Deputy Solicitor General, on brief for appellee.

October 14, 2005
Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the briefs and record on

appeal, we affirm. The appellant does not establish that the court

erred in ruling that he had not exhausted state remedies. We do

not consider the documents submitted in Spanish that have not been

translated. Loc. R. 30(d).

We hereby also deny the appellant’s remaining pending motions.

Affirmed. 1st Cir. Rule 27(c).
C O U R T O F A P P E A LS EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEXAS ELPASO, TEXAS

GERARDO A. L I CON AND L I CON ENGI

NEERI NG CO., I

NC., Appellants/Cross- Ap pe lle e s,
v. RABA KI STNER ANDERSON CONSUL TANTS, I

NC., d/b/a RABA- KI STNER CONSUL TANTS (SW), I NC. AND RAB A-KI STNER CONSUL TANTS, I

NC., Appellee s/Cross- Ap pe lla nts
. §

§ § § § § § § No . 0 8- 09 -0 00 49 -C V

Appea l from the 327th District Court of El Paso County , Texas (TC# 2002-1068)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION Th is do ub le-a

pp e a l is be fo re the c ourt

on its ow n mo tio n f

or de te rm inatio n o f whe the r i t should be dismissed for want of prosec ution. Finding that all appellants have failed to file a brief
or motion for extension of time a nd have failed to r espond to our inquiry letter, we di s m i s s the double-a ppeal f or wa nt of prosec ution. On J uly 20, 2009, the C lerk noti fied all of the appellants that their br iefs we re pa st due and no motion for extension of tim e had been filed. The letter advised the pa rties that the Court intended to dismiss th e a

p p e a l f o r w an t o f p r o s e c u ti o nu n le s s th e y

r e s p o n d e d

w it h in te nd ay s an d

s h o w ed g rounds for c onti nuing the appea l. SeeT EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)( 1). No re ply has bee n rec eived. Pursuant to Rules 38.8(a)( 1), we dismiss the appe al for w ant of prose cution.November 24, 2009 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, J ustice B e f o r e C h e w , C
. J. , M c C l u r e , a n d R i v e r a , JJ. Chew, C.J ., not participating
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the
Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 2, 2015



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Melissa Morrison                 
|Melissa Morrison                     
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-40667

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Francisco Eduardo Briseno, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:22-CR-138-2

______________________________

Before Smith, Stewart, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Francisco Eduardo Briseno appeals his guilty plea convictions for 

conspiracy to transport undocumented aliens into or within the United States

and conspiracy to conceal or harbor undocumented aliens. Briseno asserts 

that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary because the district court 

committed error under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 by failing to 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 12, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-40667 Document: 46-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2024
No. 23-40667

2

advise him that he was subject to a $5,000 special assessment, on each count,

under 18 U.S.C. § 3014(a). See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(b)(1)(H), (L).

We review Briseno’s Rule 11 argument, which was raised for the first 

time on appeal, for plain error. See United States v. Brown, 328 F.3d 787, 789 

(5th Cir. 2003). Even if the district court’s omission constitutes clear or 

obvious error, Briseno has not shown that the failure to advise him of the 

possibility of the $5,000 special assessments affected his substantial rights. 

See United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 83 (2004); see also United 

States v. Hughes, 726 F.3d 656, 662 (5th Cir. 2013). Thus, Briseno’s Rule 11 

argument fails on plain error review. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 

129, 135 (2009).

AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-40667 Document: 46-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/12/2024
ATTACHMENT VI 

Spectra
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 OF
THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
             /s/ Michael R. RodriguezMichael R. RodriguezSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer
(principal financial officer)
##### 



Re:
    
    Registration Statement on Form S-3
 Bryan Cave LLP
                       Bryan Cave International Trade  A TRADE CONSULTING SUBSIDIARY  OF NON-LAWYER PROFESSIONALS
         Bryan Cave Strategies  A GOVERNMENT RELATIONS AND POLITICAL AFFAIRS SUBSIDIARY




---



#####
#### Robert BARKER et al., Petitioners, v. Hon. John A. BRESLIN, Jr., Special Judge, Estiil Circuit Court, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Dec. 4, 1959.

*579Shackelford & Burnam, Richmond, Strange & Pendleton, Stanton, for petitioners.

Judge John A. Breslin, pro se.

CLAY, Commissioner.

This is a petition for an order of prohibition and mandamus to require respondent, Hon. John A. Breslin, Jr., as circuit judge, to permit petitioners to have a jury trial in a case now pending before him.

This is a libel suit. It was called for trial before a jury. After eight days of oral testimony, the court on its own initiative, and under the provisions of CR 39.01 (3), discharged the jury and continued the case for trial before the court. The basis of this ruling was that the trial had developed “such a great detail of facts” and “involvement of myriad rights and defenses” that the court found it was impractical for a jury intelligently to try the case.

This original proceeding seeks extraordinary relief, which is only granted by this Court under unusual circumstances where it is apparent that a great injustice and irreparable injury will result to an applicant who has no adequate remedy by appeal or otherwise. Thompson v. Wood, Ky., 277 S.W.2d 472. The petition suggests lack of jurisdiction in the Estill Circuit Court, and alleges that the remedy by appeal might not be adequate. It seems clear the Estill Circuit Court had jurisdiction of this proceeding, and it also seems clear the question now raised can be reviewed on appeal, and that such remedy is adequate. While petitioners might be saved inconvenience and expense if we undertook at this stage of the proceeding to decide whether or not respondent has committed error, such considerations are not sufficient to warrant the extraordinary relief requested.

The motion for oral argument is denied. The attention of both parties is called to Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. Howard, 256 Ky. 363, 76 S.W.2d 246.

The prayer of the petition is denied.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-11139,333-11191, 333-11195, 333-57643, 333-57641, 333-85247, 333-48672, 333-48670, 333-67158, 333-82170 and 333-100541) of our report dated February 3, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Boston CommunicationsGroup, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 24, 2003
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of instaCare Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith Berman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

|   | /s/ Keith Berman                                     			

Keith Berman |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Principal Executive Officer and |
|--------|---------------------------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

September 1, 2006