alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
SRS Labs, Inc. pertaining to SRS Labs, Inc. Incentive Stock Option, Nonqualified
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan - 1993 on Form S-8 of our report
dated May 10, 1996 (except for information pertaining to the reverse stock split
and reincorporation described in Note 1 as to which the date is June 28, 1996),
appearing in the Company's Prospectus dated August 8, 1996, filed with the
Commission on August 12, 1996, pursuant to Rule 424(b).


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Costa Mesa, California
December 30, 1996
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT, v. MARION BECKERT, PETITIONER.

Decided February 7, 1949.

*Mr. James F.*Patten, for the petitioner.

*Mr. Jesse B. Leslie*and *Mr. George F. Losche,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

Certification is denied. The defendant could have taken an appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Division as a matter of right. Moreover, the application does not come within any of the reasons laid down in *Rule*1:5-2 for granting certification.

*571
      *For denial:*Chief Justice Vanderbilt, and Justices Case, Heher, Oliphant, Wacheneeld, Burling and *Ackerson—7.*

*Opposed:*None.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 171 (Friday, September 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60772-60773]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Certain Properties From All Terms, 
Conditions, Reservations and Restrictions of a Quitclaim Deed Agreement 
Between the City of Vero Beach and the Federal Aviation Administration 
for the Vero Beach Regional Airport, Vero Beach, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for Public Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release certain 
airport properties 8.73 acres at the Vero Beach Regional Airport, 
Florida from the conditions, reservations, and restrictions as 
contained in a Quitclaim Deed agreement between the FAA and the Vero 
Beach Regional Airport, dated October 3, 1947. The City of Vero Beach 
dedicated an 8.73 acre tract along 27th Avenue, Aviation Boulevard and 
Airport Drive to become a Public Right-of-Way. This release will be 
retroactive for the improvements along the airport entrance roadway by 
the City of Vero Beach. The Fair Market Value (FMV) of this parcel has 
been determined to be $228,510.16.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Vero Beach Regional Airport and 
the FAA Airports District Office.

DATES: Comments are due on or before October 3, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at the Vero Beach 
Regional Airport, P.O. Box 1389, 3400 Cherokee Drive, Vero Beach, FL 
32961 and the FAA Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National 
Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822. Written comments on the Sponsor's 
request must be delivered or mailed to: Stephen Wilson, Program 
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National 
Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.
    In addition, a copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mr. Eric Menger, Airport

[[Page 60773]]

Director, Vero Beach Regional Airport, P.O. Box 1389, 3400 Cherokee 
Drive, Vero Beach, FL 32961-1389.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Wilson, Program Manager, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

    Issued in Orlando, FL, on August 23, 2016.
Bart Vernace, P.E.,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-21108 Filed 9-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
LOG OF MEETING

DIRECTORATE FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES

SUBJECT: ASTM Infant Hand Held Carrier Subcommittee Meeting

DATE OF MEETING: January 8, 2013

PLACE OF MEETING: ASTM Headquarters

LOG ENTRY SOURCE: Patricia Edwards

COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Patricia Edwards, Jonathan Midgett, Vince 

Amodeo, Suad Wanna-Nakamara

NON-COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Contact ASTM for attendee list

SUMMARY OF MEETING:

A. The recently balloted warning label addressing strangulation hazards was 

reviewed. That ballot had persuasive negatives. The changes required to address the 

negatives were reviewed. The revised warning label has been submitted to ASTM for 

ballot. It should go out with the next round of ballots in a week or two.

B. The metal hook specification will be revised and sent back out to ballot. This 

ballot will reduce the number of dimensional requirements dealing with lengths of the 

hooks, because they were deemed to be not important. 

C. Auto-locking test

Review of the two options that were discussed at the last task group meeting. #1) Using 

the infant hinge gage (used in the infant swing standard) and #2) using the cylinder, as 

specified in the NPR. 

One manufacturer did testing on their seats and had issues with the cylinder because it 

would not sit flat on the seat bottom. Other issues with the cylinder is that it can flop 

from left to right when the soft goods are removed from the seat. 

Issues seen with the hinge gage is that its center of gravity is not consistent with the 

CAMI or an infant, and that it does not rotate farther than 90 degrees, as a child might.

A request for more testing was made by the subcommittee chair. The goal is to do testing 

and provide comments to the CPSC’s NPR. The testing to be done include testing with 

both test loads, but with the cylinder, load it into the seat the same way the as the hinge is 

loaded (slide it down against the seat back). If there is a gap under the bottom of the 

cylinder, wedge it with Styrofoam, so that the cylinder maintains contact with the seat 

back. 

In addition, both test loads should be tested with all soft goods in place (as the carrier 

comes out of the box) and also with the soft goods removed and only the seat cover in 

place. 
Other options that can be added if testers have the equipment or time: test with the 

newborn hinge gage. Test with a different type of wedge material.

Testing to be done by Feb 1st, so that they can be shared with the task group before the 

comment period closes.
Exhibit 32.1



Statement



Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Appleton Papers Inc. (the Company),
hereby certifies that to his knowledge:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                      |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                    |  | APPLETON PAPERS INC.
|                    |  |                     
|Dated: May 18, 2005 |  |                      |  | /s/ Mark R. Richards                 
|                    |  | Name:                |  | Mark R. Richards                     
|                    |  | Title:               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED WITHIN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED FEBRUARY 3, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-03-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1,000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,367
<INVENTORY>                                     39,827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,053
<PP&E>                                         147,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,349
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           37,575
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,307
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,484
<SALES>                                        344,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               344,886
<CGS>                                          249,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  327,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,866)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   724
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,169
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial
Statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, Bruce
W. Elder, the Principal Financial Officer of Crescent Financial Corporation, in
compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by
Crescent Financial Corporation (the "Issuer") for the quarter ended March 31,
2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented
therein.




Date:   May
      12, 2010
            
            /s/
      Bruce
      W. ElderBruce
      W. ElderPrincipal Financial
      Officer
VI

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 214

For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 12 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR FANIE

4 PHILY MATEO ANGELES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et

7 seq.), Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles shall be held and consid8 ered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States

9 for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment

10 of this Act.
2

•S 214 IS

1 (b) VISA FEE.—Subsection (a) shall become effective

2 on the payment of the required visa fee for permanent res3 idence.

4 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF IMMIGRANT VISAS.

5 On the granting of permanent residence status to

6 Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles under section 1, the Secretary

7 of State shall reduce by the proper number, during fiscal

8 year 1995 or 1996, the number of immigrant visas that

9 are made available to natives of the country of birth of

10 Fanie Phily Mateo Angeles, under sections 203(a) and

11 202(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

12 1153(a) and 1152(e)).

Æ
#### Gerardo RODRIGUEZ-SOLOMON, Petitioner, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 02-70013.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*459Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.*

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Gerardo Rodriguez-Solomon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissal of his appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his request to set a hearing date and finding him ineligible for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b). We review de novo claims of due process violations, *Getachew v. INS,*25 F.3d 841, 845 (9th Cir.1994), and we deny the petition for review.

Rodriguez-Solomon contends the IJ denied him due process by refusing to calendar a hearing for his withholding of removal application and finding him ineligible for withholding of removal.

To prevail on a due process challenge to removal proceedings, Rodriguez-Solomon must show error and substantial prejudice. *See Lata v. INS,*204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000). Rodriguez-Solomon’s answers to the IJ, which were consistent with his answers in his application for withholding of removal, showed no possibility that he was eligible for the relief he sought. Thus, Rodriguez-Solomon suffered no prejudice from the alleged violation because it could not have affected the outcome of the proceedings. *See id.*Accordingly, his due process challenge fails. *See id.*

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-KSB FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,655,229
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,947,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                   123,056
<INVENTORY>                                  1,456,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,455,319
<PP&E>                                       5,001,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                 641,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,694,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,680,903
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,391
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,566,274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,694,849
<SALES>                                     22,410,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,410,718
<CGS>                                       16,749,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,905,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             303,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,201,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                   239,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            962,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 28,586
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   933,814
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                EXHIBIT 10.3.1

                       BOSTON COMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC.

                       1996 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

                                AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                AUGUST 30, 1996


     This Amendment is made to the 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
"Plan"), which was approved by the Board of Directors of Boston Communications
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on April 25, 1996, and by its stockholders on April
26, 1996.

     Section 2(b) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

          "(b)  they have been employed by the Company or a Designated
     Subsidiary for at least 12 months prior to enrolling in the Plan; and"

Except as herein provided, all other terms and conditions of the Plan remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.

     This Amendment No. 1 to the Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors of
the Company on the 29th day of August, 1996.

                              ATTEST:

                               /s/ Alan J. Bouffard
                              ___________________________
                              Alan J. Bouffard, Clerk
**EXHIBIT 10.18**

 

**SUMMARY OF 2005 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION**

 

Pursuant to the determination of the Compensation Committee and effective beginning April 1, 2005, each non-employeedirector will receive (i) a quarterly retainer of $5,000, (ii) a fee of $1,000 for each Board meeting that the non-employee director attends and (iii) reimbursement for all expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings. In addition,directors who serve on the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will receive a fee of $500 for each such committee meeting attended. The Chairperson of the Audit Committee will receive a quarterlyretainer of $1,750, the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee will receive a quarterly retainer of $750 and the Chairperson of Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will receive a quarterly retainer of $500. In addition, the LeadDirector will receive $500 per meeting. 

 

In addition to theforegoing cash compensation, each non-employee director will receive, upon initial election to the Board of Directors, (i) an option for the purchase of 11,250 of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value onthe date of grant and (ii) a grant of 1,563 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock at no cost to the non-employee director. Each of these grants vest in three, equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the day ofgrant. In addition, each non-employee director will receive (i) a quarterly grant of 417 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock at no cost to the non-employee director and (ii) a fully vested option for the purchase of 3,000 shares ofthe Company’s common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. The quarterly restricted stock grants vest in three, equal annual installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant.
We have previously overruled the court reporter’s late challenge to the trial court’s 1

determination of indigency.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00292-CV

Alejandro Perez and Bobbie Perez, Appellants

v.

Embree Construction Group, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. A-01-1086-C, HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Because this appeal has presented ongoing problems in securing a complete record,

we will abate this appeal. Appellants have filed a motion to supplement the clerk’s record and court 1

reporter’s record, by which they assert they have examined the record filed to date and it does not

comply with their designation. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c), .6. After approximately thirty days, we

have received no response to this motion. We grant the motion and direct that the record be
2

supplemented in accordance with appellants’ motion. We abate the appeal until March 1, 2006, at

which time the appeal is reinstated. Appellants’ brief is due thirty days from the reinstatement.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Abated

Filed: December 22, 2005
32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the  Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV, (the Company)  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George S. Springsteen, Chief  Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as  adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/   GEORGE S. SPRINGSTEEN





George S. Springsteen  Chief Executive Officer  November 10, 2003