alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER   PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

  I, Patrick G. Downey, Chief Executive Officer of Viceroy Exploration Ltd., (the  “Company”) , hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to  the best of my knowledge:

|   | a.     | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for        the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Annual Report”)        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | b.     | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly        presents in all material respects the financial condition and results        of operations of the Company.                                                                                                 |

|   | By:    | *“Patrick G. Downey”* |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |   |                                   |
|   | Name:  | **Patrick G. Downey**             |
|   | Title: | **Chief Executive Officer**       |
|   | Date:  | March 31, 2005                    |

*This written statement is being furnished to the Securities  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on  Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form  20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated  by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or  the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates  it by reference.*

----
VI

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 215

For the relief of Bertha Berg, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 12 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Bertha Berg, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

4 Congress finds that Bertha Berg—

5 (1) was born of German parents on Lihue,

6 Kauai in December of 1897;

7 (2) received United States citizenship through

8 the annexation of the Territory of Hawaii by the

9 United States;

10 (3) lost her United States citizenship through

11 marriage to a German citizen;
2

•S 215 IS

1 (4) renounced her German citizenship in 1930

2 and was repatriated;

3 (5) was arrested in Honolulu on December 8,

4 1941, and detained as an alien enemy at the Sand

5 Island Detention Camp on Oahu, on suspicion of

6 being dangerous to the internal security of the Unit7 ed States and the territory of Hawaii;

8 (6) was found to be engaged in subversive ac9 tivities and to be disloyal to the United States by the

10 Board of Officers and Civilians on December 26,

11 1941;

12 (7) was confined to the Sand Island Detention

13 Camp until March 3, 1943, whereupon she was

14 moved to the Honouliuli Internment Camp;

15 (8) was paroled from the Honouliuli Internment

16 Camp on June 26, 1943;

17 (9) was released from parole on February 2,

18 1944; and

19 (10) as compensation for being interned by the

20 United States Government at the Sand Island De21 tention Camp and the Honouliuli Internment Camp

22 between 1941 and 1943, and subject to conditions of

23 parole between 1943 and 1944, should receive the

24 same amount of compensation that eligible interns of

25 Japanese descent are awarded under section 105 of
3

•S 215 IS

1 the Civil Liberties Act of 1988 (50 U.S.C. App.

2 1989b–4).

3 SEC. 2. SATISFACTION OF CLAIM AGAINST THE UNITED

4 STATES.

5 (a) PAYMENT.—The Secretary of the Treasury shall

6 pay, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise ap7 propriated, the sum of $20,000 to Bertha Berg.

8 (b) BASIS.—Payment under subsection (a) shall be

9 full compensation for any physical, psychological, and eco10 nomic injuries sustained by Bertha Berg as a result of

11 being—

12 (1) involuntarily detained at the Sand Island

13 Detention Camp and the Honouliuli Internment

14 Camp between 1941 and 1943; and

15 (2) subject to conditions of parole between 1943

16 and 1944.

17 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON ATTORNEY AND AGENT FEES.

18 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not more than 10 percent of the

19 payment specified in section 2 may be paid to or received

20 by an agent or attorney as consideration for a service ren21 dered in connection with this Act.

22 (b) ENFORCEABILITY OF CONTRACT.—A contract

23 that violates subsection (a) is unenforceable.
4

•S 215 IS

1 (c) CRIMINAL PENALTY.—Violation of subsection (a)

2 is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than

3 $1,000.

Æ
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Celsia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Hakan Wretsell, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.










/s/
      Hakan Wretsell


Hakan
      Wretsell


Chief
      Executive Officer


May
      10,
      2006
9Wl eJi/1, !Band oj,.falre Supe~tiwt, e&ppewa :JtuliaM 

July 3, 2014 

Mr. Fred Leutner 

Office of Science & Technology (Mail Code 4305T) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

88385 Pike Road 

Bayfield, WI 54814 

Phone: 715-779-3700 Fax: 715-779-3704 

Email: redcliff@redcliff-nsn.gov 

Red Cliff Tribal Council 

"The Hub of the Chippewa Nation~~ 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20460 

E-mail Leutner.Fred@epa.gov 

RE: Potential Reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) Provisions regarding Treatment 

in a Similar Manner to States (TAS) 

Dear Mr. Leutner: 

It has come to Red CliffBand of Lake Superior Chippewas' attention that the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering a Reinterpretation of the rules governing 

the burden placed on tribes applying for T AS under the CW A for Section 303( c), Water Quality 

Standards. Currently, tribes must demonstrate their own inherent regulatory authority, which is 

challenging and resource intensive. This burden alone has cost tribes both time and funds to meet 

this requirement. The potential reinterpretation would eliminate the "Montana Test" by stating 

that CW A Section 518 is a delegation by Congress to eligible tribes to administer CW A 

regulatory programs over their entire reservations regardless of land ownership, and it will allow 

tribes to exercise their sovereignty by our ability and willingness to accept this delegation. 

We have applied to EPA forT AS under the CW A for section 319. It took us two years, 

beginning in 2007, and TAS status was finally approved in 2009. We are currently in the process 

of applying for TAS Section 303(c), and have yet to receive TAS for Water Quality Standards on 

our Reservation. 

The Red CliffBand of Lake Superior Chippewas believes EPA's reinterpretation will clarify and 

strengthen the inherent regulatory authority of sovereign tribes to implement EPA statutes within 

reservations regardless of land ownership. Reinterpretation would validate the legal basis for 

tribal assertion of regulatory jurisdiction under the CW A and decrease the administrative burden 

of case-by-case assessments of tribal authority. 
As Tribal leader of the Red CliffBand of Lake Superior Chippewas, I support EPA's efforts to 

reinterpret provisions of the CW A regarding the T AS process. Thank you for the opportunity to 

provide comments on this potential rule change. 

Respectfully, 

~A~~ Rose Gurnoe-Soulier 

Red Cliff Tribal Chairperson
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 234

To amend title 23, United States Code, to exempt a State from certain

penalties for failing to meet requirements relating to motorcycle helmet

laws if the State has in effect a motorcycle safety program, and to

delay the effective date of certain penalties for States that fail to meet

certain requirements for motorcycle safety laws, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 18 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. KOHL) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to exempt a State

from certain penalties for failing to meet requirements

relating to motorcycle helmet laws if the State has in

effect a motorcycle safety program, and to delay the

effective date of certain penalties for States that fail

to meet certain requirements for motorcycle safety laws,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 234 IS

1 SECTION 1. USE OF A MOTORCYCLE HELMET AND MOTOR2 CYCLE SAFETY PROGRAM.

3 Section 153(h) of title 23, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(1) FISCAL YEAR 1994.—If,’’

6 and inserting the following:

7 ‘‘(2) SAFETY BELTS.—

8 ‘‘(A) FISCAL YEAR 1994.—If,’’;

9 (2) by striking ‘‘(2) THEREAFTER.—If’’ and in10 serting the following:

11 ‘‘(B) THEREAFTER.—If,’’; and

12 (3) in paragraph (2) (as amended by para13 graphs (1) and (2)), by striking ‘‘subsection (a)(1)

14 and a law described in’’ each place it appears;

15 (4) by inserting under the subsection heading

16 the following:

17 ‘‘(1) MOTORCYCLE HELMETS.—

18 ‘‘(A) FISCAL YEAR 1996.—If, at any time

19 in fiscal year 1996, a State does not have in ef20 fect a law described in subsection (a)(1) or a

21 motorcycle safety program administered or au22 thorized by the State to reduce motorcycle acci23 dents and fatalities, the Secretary shall transfer

11 24 ⁄2 percent of the funds apportioned to the

25 State for fiscal year 1997 under each of sub26 sections (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3) of section
3

•S 234 IS

1 104 of this title to the apportionment of the

2 State under section 402 of this title.

3 ‘‘(B) THEREAFTER.—If, at any time in a

4 fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1996,

5 a State does not have in effect a law described

6 in subsection (a)(1) or a motorcycle safety pro7 gram administered by the State to reduce mo8 torcycle accidents and fatalities, the Secretary

9 shall transfer 3 percent of the funds appor10 tioned to the State for the succeeding fiscal

11 year under each of subsections (b)(1), (b)(2),

12 and (b)(3) of section 104 of this title to the ap13 portionment of the State under section 402 of

14 this title.’’.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

*CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350*

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MedicalCV, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnH. Jungbauer, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:   September 14, 2005 | By:                                                  | /s/ John H. Jungbauer |   |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|                                  | John H. Jungbauer                                    |
|                                  | Vice President, Finance and

Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0041 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM227AD

747 -25A3086, R4 --- 4/26/01 747 -25 - 3086, R3 --- 7/8/99

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 5679-041]

                    On January 24, 2024, the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (Connecticut DEEP) submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) notice that it received a complete request for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification from Energy Stream, LLC, in conjunction with the above captioned project on January 11, 2024. Pursuant to section 4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify Connecticut DEEP of the following:                

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     January 11, 2024.                

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:*                     One year, January 11, 2025.                

If Connecticut DEEP fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: January 30, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-02191 Filed 2-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
(1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-136985) pertaining to the FBL Financial Group, Inc.
2006 Class A Common Stock Compensation Plan,(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-108161) pertaining to the Amended and Restated FBL
Financial Group, Inc. 1996 Class A Common Stock Compensation Plan,(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-108151) pertaining to the Farm Bureau 401(k) Savings
Plan,(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-108152) pertaining to the FBL Financial Group, Inc.
Director Compensation Plan,(5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-155627) pertaining to the Direct Stock Purchase
Plan,(6)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-125227) pertaining to the Executive Deferred Salary
Bonus Compensation Plan,(7)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-141949) pertaining to the 5.875% Senior Note
Exchange Offer;(8)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-4 No. 333-115197) pertaining to the 5.85% Senior Note
Exchange Offer;
#### Isaac FLORES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas MADOX; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-17237.

D.C. No. CV-99-20185-RMW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 22, 2002.*

Decided July 29, 2002.

*56Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Isaac Flores, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging prison officials violated his rights when they placed him in administrative segregation due to his validation as a prison gang member. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *see Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 816 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and reverse and remand.

Because Flores was proceeding pro se, the district court should have explained the deficiencies of his complaint and provided him with an opportunity to allege facts that defendants’ confidential information was unreliable in light of *Zimmerlee v. Keeney,*831 F.2d 183, 186 (9th Cir.1987). *See Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc).

We reject Flores’ remaining contentions as meritless.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No 

PMN: 08-0199

Standard Review Draft 03/17/2008 

ENGINEER: Arnold 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: No Label: No 

TLV/PEL: 

CRSS (02/04/2008): 

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 

VP: 

MW: 10000.00 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info: 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (02/05/2008): 

Migration to groundwater: Score is "U" 

PBT rating: P3B1T1 

Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation, XB Testing (Health testing 

desired) Eco: 1 Not Required, XB Testing (No eco testing desired) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 
STANDARD REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No 

PMN: 08-0199
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 383

To provide for the establishment of policy on the deployment by the United

States of an antiballistic missile system and of advanced theater missile

defense systems.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 10 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. KYL, Mr. SMITH, Mr. LOTT, Mr. INHOFE,

Mr. MCCAIN, and Mr. KEMPTHORNE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To provide for the establishment of policy on the deployment

by the United States of an antiballistic missile system

and of advanced theater missile defense systems.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF POLICY.

4 It shall be the policy of the United States to—

5 (1) deploy at the earliest practical date an anti6 ballistic missile system that is capable of providing

7 a highly effective defense of the United States

8 against ballistic missile attacks; and
2

•S 383 IS

1 (2) provide at the earliest practical date highly

2 effective theater missile defenses (TMDs) to for3 ward-deployed and expeditionary elements of the

4 Armed Forces of the United States and to friendly

5 forces and allies of the United States.

6 SEC. 2. ACTIONS OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.

7 (a) ABM SYSTEMS.—The Secretary of Defense shall

8 develop for deployment at the earliest practical date a

9 cost-effective, operationally effective antiballistic missile

10 system designed to protect the United States against bal11 listic missile attacks.

12 (b) ADVANCED THEATER MISSILE DEFENSES.—The

13 Secretary of Defense shall develop for deployment at the

14 earliest practical date advanced theater missile defense

15 systems.

16 SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

17 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 60 days after the

18 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense

19 shall submit to the congressional defense committees a

20 plan for the deployment of an antiballistic missile system

21 pursuant to section 2(a) and for the deployment of theater

22 missile defense systems pursuant to section 2(b).

23 (b) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES.—For

24 purposes of this section, the term ‘‘congressional defense

25 committees’’ means—
3

•S 383 IS

1 (1) the Committee on National Security and the

2 Committee on Appropriations of the House of Rep3 resentatives; and

4 (2) the Committee on Armed Services and the

5 Committee on Appropriations of the Senate.

Æ
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Ugly Duckling Corporation:

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the registration  statements of
Ugly Duckling  Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-90041) filed as of November
1, 1999; Form S-3 (File No.  333-31531) filed as of July 18, 1997, as amended by
pre-effective  amendment  No. 1 to Form S-3 filed as of July 30, 1997;  Form S-3
(File No. 333-22237) filed as  post-effective  amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 as of
July 18,  1997;  Form S-8 (File No.  333-32313)  for Ugly  Duckling  Corporation
Long-Term  Incentive  Plan  filed  as of July  29,  1997;  Form  S-8  (File  No.
333-08457) for Ugly Duckling  Corporation  Long-Term  Incentive Plan filed as of
July 19,  1996;  Form S-8 (File No.  333-06615)  for Ugly  Duckling  Corporation
Director  Incentive  Plan  filed as of June 21,  1996;  and Form S-8  (File  No.
333-72717) for Ugly Duckling  Corporation 1998 Executive Incentive Plan filed as
of  February  22,  1999,  of our report  dated March 10,  2000,  relating to the
consolidated  balance sheets of Ugly Duckling Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December  31,  1999  and  1998,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements  of
operations,  stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the years in the
three-year  period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December
31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of Ugly Duckling Corporation.

                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Phoenix, Arizona
March 29, 2000