alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 257 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 257

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars to make eligible 
 for membership those veterans that have served within the territorial 
                         limits of South Korea.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 5 of the 
Act of May 28, 1936 (36 U.S.C. 115), is amended to read as follows:
    ``Sec. 5. A person may not be a member of the corporation created 
by this Act unless that person--
            ``(1) served honorably as a member of the Armed Forces of 
        the United States in a foreign war, insurrection, or 
        expedition, which service has been recognized as campaign-medal 
        service and is governed by the authorization of the award of a 
        campaign badge by the Government of the United States; or
            ``(2) while a member of the Armed Forces of the United 
        States, served honorably on the Korean peninsula or in its 
        territorial waters for not less than 30 consecutive days, or a 
        total of 60 days, after June 30, 1949.''

            Passed the Senate February 10 (legislative day, January 
      30), 1995.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 257

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the charter of the Veterans of Foreign Wars to make eligible 
 for membership those veterans that have served within the territorial 
                         limits of South Korea.
```
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### 2013 - SW - 058 - AD These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### FAA - 2014 - 0039 response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7241

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HELENIA LOUISE BOYD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (7:04-cr-01008-GRA) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 18, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jessica Ann Salvini, SALVINI & BENNETT, LLC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellant. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Helenia Louise Boyd appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to expunge her criminal record. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Boyd , No. 7:04-cr-01008-GRA (D.S.C. Aug. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 10.45**

 

**Director compensation summary**

 

We pay no additional remuneration to our employees who also serve as directors of the General Partner. Each director of our general partner who is not anemployee of our General Partner receives an annual retainer of $20,000, plus $2,000 per board meeting attended, and is reimbursed for any travel, lodging and other out-of-pocket expenses related to meeting attendance or otherwise related to serviceon the board. Each non-employee director serving as a member or chairman of a designated committee receives from $5,000 to $7,500 annually, depending upon the position and the committee, plus $1,000 per committee meeting attended. In addition,non-employee directors receive an Initial Director’s Grant of 2,000 units upon their initial election or appointment to the Board, and an Annual Director’s Grant on September 1 of each year, equal to $15,000 divided by the fair marketvalue of a Common Unit on September 1, provided that such director is in office on such date. Director’s grants vest ratably over a three-year period.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|Dated: June 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    RICHARD L. KEISTER
|                     |  |  |  | Richard L. Keister       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael G. Carlton, the Chief Executive Officer of Crescent Financial Corporation, in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by Crescent Financial Corporation (the Issuer) for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on
the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                   |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael G. Carlton               
|                   |  |     |  | Michael G. Carlton                   
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



- 29 -
----

----

|   | (1) | the      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30,      2008  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,      and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                               |                                                |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                          | PAPERWEIGHT      DEVELOPMENT CORP. |
|                          |                               |                                                |
| Dated:      May 12, 2008 |                               |        /s/ Mark R. Richards                    |
|                          | Name:                              | Mark      R. Richards                               |
|                          | Title:                             | Chairman,      President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 20 (Tuesday, January 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 5893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01772]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT SYSTEM INSURANCE CORPORATION


Board of Directors Meeting

SUMMARY: Notice of the forthcoming regular meeting of the Board of 
Directors of the Farm Credit System Insurance Corporation (FCSIC), is 
hereby given in accordance with the provisions of the Bylaws of the 
FCSIC.

DATES: 10 a.m., Wednesday, February 7, 2024.

ADDRESSES: You may observe the open portions of this meeting in person 
at 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. 
If you would like to virtually attend, at least 24 hours in advance, 
visit FCSIC.gov, select ``News & Events,'' then select ``Board 
Meetings.'' From there, access the linked ``Instructions for board 
meeting visitors'' and complete the described registration process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you need more information or 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley 
Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-
4056.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting will be open to the 
public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public. The 
following matters will be considered:

Portions Open to the Public

    <bullet> Approval of Minutes for December 13, 2023.
    <bullet> Review and Setting of Insurance Premium Accrual Rates.

Portions Closed to the Public

    <bullet> Annual Report on Contracts.
    <bullet> Annual Report on Whistleblower Activity.

Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-01772 Filed 1-29-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7928

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

YOLANDA VIOLA BURGESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-7991

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

YOLANDA VIOLA BURGESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-00-162-A)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 6, 2002
2

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yolanda Viola Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Riley Pedersen,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Yolanda Viola Burgess seeks to

appeal the district court’s orders denying her motions for provision of transcripts. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis but affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Burgess, No. CR00-162-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2001; Nov. 6, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 1

Appendix II – Documentation of the Emission Benefit Estimates for the Performance of 

IM on Light Duty Diesel Vehicles

Calculation Methodology – See EXCEL Spreadsheet for Numeric Results and 

References

The preferred methodology for estimating emission benefits of increasing the stringency

of an IM program is to use the federal MOBILE6.2 model. However, the MOBILE6.2

model does not contain the capability to model IM programs for diesel vehicles. The

NJDEP Bureau of Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (BMVIM) has developed 

the following methodology for estimating benefits for an IM program for light duty diesel 

vehicles (LDDV) that involves OBDII testing and smoke testing components. 

The first step is to obtain estimates of LDDV counts from the New Jersey Motor Vehicle 

Commission (MVC) registration database quarterly extract from December 2007 data. 

Then estimate the projected inspection failures that will result from each of the new IM 

program components. The projected failures for LDDVs were estimated by considering 

current failure rates for gasoline vehicles undergoing a similar inspection test. The 

smoke test failure rate was for vehicles that failed for smoke only, i.e., vehicles that failed 

for smoke and some other test were not included. In addition, the failure rates and test 

volumes were adjusted to account for the differing age distributions between light duty

gasoline and light duty diesel vehicles. Emission benefits were then calculated by

multiplying the total benefits from the current analogous gasoline IM program by the 

ratio of the projected new LDDV failures to the current gasoline vehicle failures. 

OBDII testing of Light Duty Diesel Vehicles:

Adding these vehicles currently untested for emissions to the IM program will result in an 

estimated 4,190 new inspections per year with an additional 356 failures. This represents 

about 0.3% of the current program OBDII failure rate. The true impact will be driven by

technology changes implemented by the manufacturers and diesel vehicle sales in the 

ensuing years. 

Smoke testing of Light Duty Diesel Vehicles:

Adding these vehicles currently untested for emissions to the IM program will result in an 

estimated 9,399 new inspections per year with an additional 9 failures. This represents an 

added 0.008% to the overall emission failure rate. Potential failure rates for Smoke tests 

on vehicles equipped with new diesel particulate filter technology is still an unknown. 

The true impact will be driven by technology changes implemented by the manufacturers

and diesel vehicle sales in the ensuing years.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1705

To eliminate the duties on Tetraamino Biphenyl.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 25, 1996

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To eliminate the duties on Tetraamino Biphenyl.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF DUTIES ON

4 3,3′-DIAMINOBENZIDINE (TETRAAMINO

5 BIPHENYL).

6 (a) ELIMINATION OF DUTIES.—The President—

7 (1) shall proclaim duty-free entry for 3,3′-

8 diaminobenzidine (Tetraamino Biphenyl), to be ef9 fective with respect to the entry of goods on or after

10 January 1, 1995, and

11 (2) shall take such actions as are necessary to

12 reflect such tariff treatment in Schedule XX, as de-
2

•S 1705 IS

1 fined in section 2(5) of the Uruguay Round Agree2 ments Act (19 U.S.C. 3501(5)).

3 (b) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION AND REFUND

4 OF DUTY PAID ON ENTRIES.—

5 (1) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION.—Not6 withstanding section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930

7 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other provision of law, and

8 subject to paragraph (2), the Secretary of the Treas9 ury shall liquidate or reliquidate any entry of goods

10 described in subsection (a) that was made on or

11 after January 1, 1995, and before the proclamation

12 is issued under subsection (a), and refund any duty

13 or excess duty that was paid on such entry.

14 (2) REQUESTS.—Liquidation or reliquidation

15 may be made under paragraph (1) with respect to

16 any entry only if a request therefor is filed with the

17 Customs Service, within 180 days after the date of

18 the enactment of this Act, that contains sufficient

19 information to enable the Customs Service—

20 (A) to locate the entry; or

21 (B) to reconstruct the entry if it cannot be

22 located.
3

•S 1705 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

2 As used in this Act, the term ‘‘entry’’ includes a with3 drawal from warehouse for consumption.

Æ
# Leadership and Community Capacity - Appalachian Regional Commission

- Mary Moran Program Analyst.The post Mary Moran appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
- Bettina Jones Program Analyst.The post Bettina Jones appeared first on Appalachian Regional Commission.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Keith Berman, the Principal Executive Officer of InstaCare Corp., and Principal Financial Officer of InstaCare Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InstaCare Corp. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InstaCare Corp.  Date: August 22, 2011/s/Keith Berman Keith Berman
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to InstaCare Corp. and will be retained by InstaCare Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

__2012

________ - NM -

___ 0 29

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant ? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
ANGELA LAY

,

Petitioner

,

v. Case No. 5D 1 8

- 2692

STAT E OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent

. ________________________________/

Opinion filed September 14, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Mike Graves, Public Defender

, and Amanda Sizemore, Assistant Public Defender, Ocala, for Petition er.

No Appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed

with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the July 9 , 2018 order on

motion to m itigate and the July 10, 2018 amended judgment and sentence rendered in

C ase N o. 2016

- CF

- 1928

, in the Circuit Court in and for Marion County, Florida. See

Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D).

PETITION GRANTED

.

COHEN, C.J., and ORFINGER and EVANDER

, JJ., concur.