alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        In connection with the Quarterly  Report of EmergenSys  Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Bruno Lemay,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material  respect,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
                operations of the Company.

        A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Bruno Lemay
--------------------------------
Name:  Bruno Lemay
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  December 17, 2003


                                       1
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Periodic Report of instaCare Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith Berman, Principal Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Keith Berman Keith Berman Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer May 27, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2102 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 624
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2102

To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 20, 1996

 Mr. Hatfield introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  ordered to be placed on the Calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF TREATY.

    The Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America and 
the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
concluded on November 15, 1865, and entered into pursuant to the Senate 
resolution of ratification dated March 2, 1867 (14 Stat. 751), shall 
have no force or effect.
                                     

                                                     Calendar No.   624

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2102

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 20, 1996

          Read twice and ordered to be placed on the Calendar
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2159

To set the time for the convening of the 105th Congress

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 28, 1996

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read

the third time, and passed

A BILL

To set the time for the convening of the 105th Congress

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the 1st Session of the 105th Congress shall convene

4 at noon on January 7th, 1997.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2008 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                           |  |        |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.
|                     |  |  |  |                           |  | Name:  |  | Willis H. Newton, Jr.                                
|                     |  |  |  |                           |  | Title: |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.40


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE STAPLES, INC. 
SURVIVOR BENEFIT PLAN


WHEREAS, Staples, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the Staples, Inc. Survivor Benefit Plan (the "Plan"); and


WHEREAS, Section 9.1 of the Plan authorizes the Company to amend or terminate the Plan at any time.


NOW THEREFORE, Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following new provision:


5.1.  Pre-Retirement Survivor Benefit.


(a)Deaths Before January 1, 2017.  With respect to survivor benefits paid by the Plan relating to Participant deaths occurring prior to January 1, 2017, if a Participant dies  while employed by the Company, the Company shall pay to the deceased Participant's Beneficiary as a survivor benefit, an annual amount equal to (1) one hundred percent (100%) of the Participant's Recognized Compensation at date of death for one year, and (2) fifty  percent (50%) of the Participant's Recognized Compensation at date of death for each of the following two (2) years.


(b)Deaths on or after January 1, 2017. Notwithstanding subsection (a) above, the following groups shall be eligible for different benefits under the Plan:


(1)2016 Grandfathered Group.   Effective with respect to individuals  who were eligible to participate in the Plan as of December 31, 2016, if such a Participant  dies while employed by the Company, the Company shall pay to the deceased  Participant's Beneficiary as a survivor benefit, an annual amount equal to (1) one  hundred percent (100%) of the Participant's Recognized Compensation as of December  31, 2016 for one year, and (2) fifty percent (50%) of the Participant's Recognized  Compensation as of December 31, 2016 for each of the following two (2) years.


(2)Post-2016 Non-Grandfathered Group.    Effective  with  respect  to   an individual who becomes a Participant in the Plan on or after January 1, 2017, if  such Participant dies while employed by the Company, the Company shall pay to the deceased Participant's Beneficiary as a survivor benefit, an annual amount equal to (1) one hundred percent (100%) of the Participant's current base salary at date of death for one year, and (2) fifty percent (50%) of the current base salary at date of death for each of the following two (2) years.


This Survivor Benefit shall be payable in periodic installments commencing in the month following the Participant's death. The Company shall deduct from any payment of benefits the amount of any federal, state or local income or employment taxes required to be withheld or paid with respect to this distribution.



















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed this 20 day of December, 2016.


Staples, Inc.




By:         /s/ Regis Mulot    




Title:        EVP HR
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER
61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

March 11, 2014

Ms. Myra Reece Bureau Chief Bureau of Air Quality Environmental Quality Control South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201

Dear Ms. Reece:

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency’s FY 2013 Air Pollution Control grant authorized by §105 of the Clean Air Act. This repor t outlines your agency’s various grant commitments

and their status. Since there were no issues and no adjustments necessary, your report is now finalized. This letter documents the conclusion of the join t evaluation process require d by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 35.115 and identified as a commitment in your FY 2013 Air Planning Agreement under Cross Cutting Issues

.
We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2013 and look forward to continuing our joint efforts to protect and improve air quality. If you have any ques tions or comments, please contact me at (404) 562- 9141 or Gwendolyn Graf at (404) 562-9289.

Sincerely,

Gregg M. Worley, Chief Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch

Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division
#### Nasir A. JAMIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas E. WHITE, The Honorable, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1526.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 27, 2003.

Decided Feb. 7, 2003.

Anser Ahmad, Ahmad & Mirin, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Virginia B. Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appel-lee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Nasir Jamil appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee. Jamil filed this complaint pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, *as amended,*42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.2002), alleging the United States Secretary of the Army discriminated against him when he was denied a pro*659motion based on his race and national origin. We affirm.

We review an award of summary judgment de novo. *Higgins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.,*863 F.2d 1162, 1167 (4th Cir.1988). Summary judgment is appropriate only if there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); *Celotex Corp. v. Ca-trett,*477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). The evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. *Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.,*477 U.S. 242, 255, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986).

Unlawful discrimination claims are analyzed under the burden-shifting framework from *McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,*411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). The district court found that Jamil established a prima facie case under this framework but that the Secretary then met its burden to articulate a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason why Jamil was not selected for the positions in question. *See Carter v. Ball,*33 F.3d 450, 458 (4th Cir.1994) (applying *McDonnell Douglas*criteria within the failure to promote context). We are not persuaded that the district court erred. Because Jamil failed to produce evidence sufficient to establish a genuine issue for trial as to whether the Secretary’s proffered reason was pretextual, the district court properly granted summary judgment for the Secretary. *See id.*

Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
[ARTICLE] 5



                                 EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT


                                                          Names under which
                             Place of  Incorporation        doing business
                             -----------------------      -----------------

1. Voice Systems Technology Inc. Delaware            Boston Communications Group

2. Cellular Express, Inc.        Massachusetts       Boston Communications Group

3. BCG Securities Corp.          Massachusetts       Boston Communications Group

4. BCGII Foreign Sales Corp.     Barbados            BCGII Foreign Sales Corp.

5. BCG de Mexico, S.r.l.         Mexico              Boston Communications Group

6. Wireless Roaming, Inc.        Delaware            Boston Communications Group

7. BCGI Communications Corp.     Delaware            Boston Communications Group
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

SONY CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

FUJIFILM CORPORATION

, Appellee

______________________

2018

- 1421

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016

-

01183.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ATTHEW A. S MITH

, Smith Baluch LLP, Menlo Park,

CA, argued for appellant.

E LIOT D AMON W ILLIAMS

, Baker Botts LLP, Palo Alto,

CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by D AVID T OBIN

, Dallas, TX; R OBERT L AWRENCE M AIER

, R OBERT C.

S CHEINFELD , New York, NY.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it isO RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (W ALLACH

, T ARANTO

, and S TOLL

, Circuit

Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        Consent of KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


The Board of Directors
Carson Pirie Scott & Co.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-20419, 33-89262, 33-84764, 33-71684 and 33-93012) on Form S-8 of Carson
Pirie Scott & Co. of our report dated February 27, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Carson Pirie Scott & Co. and subsidiaries as of
February 1, 1997 and February 3, 1996, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended February 1, 1997, and the related schedule, which report
appears in the February 1, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carson Pirie Scott
& Co.

As discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has
changed its method of calculating LIFO inventories in 1996.

                                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

                                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
April 24, 1997
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

h0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148251

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148251

COA: 311443

Muskegon CC: 11

- 060241

- FC;

RYAN CHRISTOPHER GIERZAK, 11

- 060242

- FH

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Celsia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Formichelli,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Joseph C. Formichelli


Joseph
      C.
      Formichelli


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      13, 2008
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM





We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 Nos. 333-137844, 333-134638, 333-111725, 333-109693, 333-12542
and 333-177591 and on Form F-3 Nos. 333-183961 and 333-193898 of Flamel
Technologies S.A.,of our report dated April 30, 2014, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.



Lyon, France, April 30, 2014



PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit



Represented by

|/s/ Nicolas Brunetaud      | 
|-------------------------- | 
|Nicolas Brunetaud (signed) |
Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants

      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our reports dated February 15, 2000 (except with respect to the
matter discussed in Note 14, as to which the date is March 6, 2000), included in
or incorporated by reference into Thermo Optek Corporation's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2000, into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements as follows:  Registration Statement No. 333-13757
on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-13759 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement No. 333-13761 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-67869 on
Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-81421 on Form S-8.



                                          Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2000
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Charles S.Hilliard, President and Chief Financial Officer of United Online, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(a)   theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| Dated: May 3, 2007                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ CHARLES S. HILLIARD                 |   |
| Charles S. Hilliard                     |   |
| *President and Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01676]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 2024 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 5421]]



FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

11 CFR Parts 104 and 9036

[Notice 2024-04]


Technological Modernization; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Election Commission is correcting two amendatory 
instructions that appeared in a final rule published in the Federal 
Register on January 2, 2024. The final rule revised certain Commission 
regulations in light of technological advances in communications, 
recordkeeping, and financial transactions, and eliminated and updated 
regulatory references to outdated technologies.

DATES: Effective March 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Rothstein, Assistant General 
Counsel, or Ms. Joanna S. Waldstreicher or Mr. Tony Buckley, Attorneys, 
1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 
424-9530.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2023-27908 appearing on page 196 
in the Federal Register of Tuesday, January 2, 2024, the following 
corrections are made:


Sec.  104.3  [Corrected]

0
1. On page 216, in the first column, correct instruction 42 to read 
``Amend Sec.  104.3(e)(5) by removing the phrase ``at the street 
address identified in the definition of ``Commission'' in Sec.  1.2 of 
this chapter,''.''


Sec.  9036.1  [Corrected]

0
2. On page 221, in the second column, correct instruction 131.e., for 
Sec.  9036.1, to read ``In paragraph (b)(6), remove the words ``full-
sized photocopy'' and add in their place the words ``record that 
contains a complete image''; and''.

    Dated: January 24, 2024.

    On behalf of the Commission.
Sean J. Cooksey,
Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-01676 Filed 1-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P