alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 154 (Monday, August 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 46770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18843]

[[Page 46770]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the South Dakota Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a briefing meeting of 
the South Dakota Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
10:00 a.m. (CDT) on Wednesday, August 27, 2014, at the United Tribes 
Technical College-Rapid City Campus, Freedom Hall, 321 Kansas City 
Street, Rapid City, SD 57701. The purpose of the briefing is to hear 
from government officials, law enforcement experts, and advocates 
regarding civil rights issues in South Dakota, specifically to the 
administration of criminal justice in Rapid City. The briefing will 
include testimony from invited presenters as well as members of the 
public. The South Dakota Advisory Committee will hear about 
experiences, initiatives, programs and concerns with criminal justice 
in Rapid City.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, September 
29, 2014. Comments may be mailed to the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 999 18th Street, Suite 1380 South, 
Denver, CO 80202, faxed to (303) 866-1050, or emailed to Evelyn Bohor 
at ebohor@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may 
contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at 303-866-1040.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Rocky 
Mountain Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office at the 
above phone number, email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated August 5, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-18843 Filed 8-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130744 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130744 COA: 257260 Saginaw CC: 03-023041-FC ANTHONY JAMES WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 24, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0724 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 31, 2006

Clerk
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27711 

The Honorable Scott Sifton 

State Senator 

District 1 

201 West Capitol A venue 

Jefferson City, Missouri 65101-6806 

Dear Senator Sifton: 

AUG 2 2 2014 

OFFICE OF 

AIR QUALITY PLANNING 

AND STANDARDS 

Thank you for your letter of July 29, 2014, to United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Administrator McCarthy regarding the EPA's review of the national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS) for ozone. The Administrator asked that I respond on her behalf. 

The EPA is currently in the midst of reviewing the ozone NAAQS. We expects to complete its 

review and issue a proposed rule reflecting the Administrator's decision about the 

appropriateness of revising the standards by December 1, 2014. As we move forward, we will 

take into account your comments in favor of tightening the 8-hour primary ozone standard to a 

level of 60 parts per billion (ppb ). 

Under the Clean Air Act, decisions regarding the NAAQS must be based solely on an evaluation 

of the health and environmental effects evidence. The EPA is prohibited from considering costs 

or ease of implementation in setting the NAAQS. However, once the Administrator has 

determined the appropriate level for the standards, costs are carefully considered as part of the 

implementation process. 

Your comments and recommendations will be forwarded to the docket for this rulemaking 

(Docket ID No. EP A-HQ-OAR-2008-0699) so that they may be considered, along with the 

recommendations of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee, and other comments 

received, as the EPA develops its proposed decision. 

Again, thank you for your letter. I appreciate the opportunity to be of service, and hope this 

information has been helpful to you. 

ephen . Page 

Director 

Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards 

lntemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed wnh Vegetable 011 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 25% Postconsumer)
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-24047, Form S-8 No. 333-57799 and Form S-8 No. 333-44416) pertaining to the Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, of our report dated May 29, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 29, 2002.





Los Angeles, California


June 25, 2002
June 17, 2014 

BY FACSIMILE 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office 

des transports 

du Canada 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Gretch 

Reference: OST 2006-24269 

Canadian 

Transportation 

Agency 

M4820-U5-19 

This letter confirms that the Canadian Transportation Agency considers applications by United 

States air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Canada, including charters 

between Canada and third countries, in accordance with the provisions of the Air Transport 

Agreement between Canada and the United States of America, signed March 12, 2007 

(Agreement). In addition, as established in the Agreement, charter services not specified in the 

Annex to that Agreement, are considered on the basis of comity and reciprocity. 

Manager International Agreements 

cc Martin Loken, ANA 

Marc Rioux, ACEA. 

Brian Hedberg, US DoT 

Robert Finamore, US DOT 

Ottawa (Ontario) K1A ON9 

www.cta-otc.gc.ca 

Canada 

Ottawa Ontario K1 A ON9 

www.cta-otc.gc.ca 

Page i I i
VI

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 313

For the relief of Luis A. Gonzalez and Virginia Aguilla Gonzalez.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 1 (legislative day, JANUARY 30), 1995

Mr. EXON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Luis A. Gonzalez and Virginia Aguilla

Gonzalez.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for pur5 poses of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

6 1101 et seq.), Luis A. Gonzalez and Virginia Aguilla Gon7 zalez shall be held and considered to have been lawfully

8 admitted to the United States for permanent residence as

9 of the date of the enactment of this Act upon payment

10 of the required visa fee.
2

•S 313 IS

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

2 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Luis

3 A. Gonzalez and Virginia Aguilla Gonzalez as provided in

4 this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper

5 officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal

6 year the total number of immigrant visas available to na7 tives of the country of each alien’s birth under section

8 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

9 1153(a)).

Æ
2006 BOARD OF DIRECTORS  SPECIAL CASH DISTRIBUTION ELECTION FORM
 December 19, 2008
 First Name:
    
    Last Name:
    
    SSN:
  This Special Cash Distribution Election Form relates to the distribution of 2006 deferred
compensation under the Ingram Micro Inc. Board of Directors Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan)
that would not otherwise be payable in 2008, provided that such election does not cause any amounts
to be paid in 2008 that would not otherwise be payable in 2008, in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and I.R.S. Notice 2005-1 (as extended by
I.R.S. Notice 2007-86). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Special Cash
Distribution Election Form will have the meanings ascribed to those terms in the Plan.
  I elect the following distribution date and form of distribution payment for my
2006 compensation that I elected to defer under the Plan according to my 2006
Cash Deferral and Investment Election that is not otherwise payable in 2008;
provided that, this election shall not cause any amounts to be paid in 2008
that would not otherwise be payable in 2008.
 1. DISTRIBUTION DATE**:
 The last business day of the month in which occurs the 60th day following separation from service from the Board with the
Corporation, including death, disability or retirement.On January 31 of the calendar year following the year of separation from service from the Board with the Corporation, including
death, disability or retirement.The last business day of , or, if earlier, upon the last business day of
                          
                 Month            Year
the month in which occurs the 60th day following separation from service from the Board with the
Corporation, including death, disability or retirement.
 2. DISTRIBUTION PAYMENT OPTIONS**:
 Lump Sum Payment
    
    5 Annual Installments (5 years)
    
    20 Quarterly Installments (5 years)10 Annual Installments (10 years)
    
    40 Quarterly Installments (10 years)15 Annual Installments (15 years)
    
    60 Quarterly Installments (15 years)
 
 **
    
    If you do not make an election for the form of your distribution payment, the default form of
distribution will be lump sum commencing on the last business day of the month in which occurs the
60th day following your termination of service from the Board with the Company,
including death, disability or retirement. th
  B. BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION:
 Name
    
    Relationship
    
    Social Security Number
    
    Percentage
   Directors Signature
    
    
    
    Date
Reactive Solids Whose Threshold Planning Quantities 

Should Be Less Than 10,000 Pounds 

The Agency has derermined that certain solid chemicals, because they are 

highly reactive with air or water, or explosive, are more likely than other 

solids to be dispersed into the air. Some react with air or water to form an 

extremely toxic gas. These chemicals should not be assigned 10,000-pound 

threshold planning quantities regardless of the form in which they are used or 

stored. The Agency has identified 14 highly and rapidly reactive solids from 

the list of hazardous substances. These highly reactive solids are listed 

below aLong with their threshold planning quantities and the reasons why these 

threshold planning quantities should not be raised to 10,000 pounds. 
c al m 3 

.- A 

0 X al OUL 

u .- Q 

EE> 

om- " 5 '; aJ 

UI E 

254: 

0 .- - C UI Ln 

Pam4 - m m '- ouum 

E22$
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial**


**Statements
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-**


**Oxley
      Act of 2002**







I,
      Michael G. Carlton, the Chief Executive Officer of Crescent Financial
      Corporation, in compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the
      Form
      10-Q filed by Crescent Financial Corporation (the "Issuer") for the quarter
      ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained
      in that report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the
      periods presented therein.




Date: August
                  8, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Michael
                  G. CarltonMichael
                      G. Carlton
                    President
                      and Chief Executive
                      Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2180

To establish felony violations for the failure to pay legal child support

obligations, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 30, 1996

Mr. KOHL (for himself and Mr. SHELBY) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To establish felony violations for the failure to pay legal

child support obligations, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Deadbeat Parents

5 Punishment Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF FELONY VIOLATIONS.

7 Section 228 of title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended to read as follows:

9 ‘‘§ 228. Failure to pay legal child support obligations

10 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Any person who—
2

•S 2180 IS

1 ‘‘(1) willfully fails to pay a support obligation

2 with respect to a child who resides in another State,

3 if such obligation has remained unpaid for a period

4 longer than one year, or is greater than $5,000;

5 ‘‘(2) travels in interstate or foreign commerce

6 with the intent to evade a support obligation, if such

7 obligation has remained unpaid for a period longer

8 than one year, or is greater than $5,000; or

9 ‘‘(3) willfully fails to pay a support obligation

10 with respect to a child who resides in another State,

11 if such obligation has remained unpaid for a period

12 longer than two years, or is greater than $10,000;

13 shall be punished as provided in subsection (c).

14 ‘‘(b) PRESUMPTION.—The existence of a support ob15 ligation that was in effect for the time period charged in

16 the indictment or information creates a rebuttable pre17 sumption that the obligor has the ability to pay the sup18 port obligation for that time period.

19 ‘‘(c) PUNISHMENT.—The punishment for an offense

20 under this section is—

21 ‘‘(1) in the case of a first offense under sub22 section (a)(1), a fine under this title, imprisonment

23 for not more than 6 months, or both; and

24 ‘‘(2) in the case of an offense under subsection

25 (a)(2) or (a)(3), or a second or subsequent offense
3

•S 2180 IS

1 under subsection (a)(1), a fine under this title, im2 prisonment for not more than 2 years, or both.

3 ‘‘(d) MANDATORY RESTITUTION.—Upon a conviction

4 under this section, the court shall order restitution under

5 section 3663A in an amount equal to the total unpaid sup6 port obligation as it exists at the time of sentencing.

7 ‘‘(e) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section—

8 ‘‘(1) the term ‘support obligation’ means any

9 amount determined under a court order or an order

10 of an administrative process pursuant to the law of

11 a State to be due from a person for the support and

12 maintenance of a child or of a child and the parent

13 with whom the child is living; and

14 ‘‘(2) the term ‘State’ includes any State of the

15 United States, the District of Columbia, and any

16 commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United

17 States.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr., President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is being provided
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not deemed to be filed for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: November 8, 2010



/s/

Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.Robert H.B. Baldwin, Jr.President and Chief Financial Officer
#### CREWS WELL SERVICE, Petitioner, v. The TEXAS COMPANY, Respondent.

No. A-9124.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Oct. 3, 1962.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 31, 1962.

Keys, Russell, Keys & Watson, Corpus Christi, for petitioner.

Kleberg, Mobley, Lockett & Weil, Corpus Christi, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Civil Appeals concluded that the evidence was sufficient in law to support the trial court’s implied finding that “Del Bosque’s death was not the result of negligence of appellee (The Texas Company), but that appellee was justified ira making a settlement of the federal court case against it rather than risk a trial”. Tex.Civ.App., 358 S.W.2d 171. We agree with this holding which supports an affirmance of the trial court’s judgment and we do not pass upon the Court of Civil Appeals’ further holding that under the indemnity provision of the contract between the parties the petitioner would have been liable to respondent for money paid out because of Del Bosque’s death even in the event such death had been caused by negligence on the part of the respondent.

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error.

WALKER, J., not sitting.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 201 7 0 0 291

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.


### AHARON M. MCGHEE Hospitalman Recruit (E

- 1 ) , U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________ Appea l from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Robert J. Crow , JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: Command er , Navy Region Southeast,

Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Commander G eo rge W. Lucier , JAGC, USN

. For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Paul D. Jenkins , JAGC, USN

.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

_________________________ Decided 11 January 2018

_________________________ Before M ARKS , W OODARD , and H INES , Appellate Military Ju dges

_________________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c) . The supplemental court

- martial order will reflect: Note 1: The military judge consolidated Specifications 1 and 2 of Additional Charge III into one

s pecification for findings: Additional Charge III: CONSOLIDATED SPECIFICATION: Violation of the UCMJ, Art icle 90 (Willful disobedience of superior commissioned officer): In that Hospitalman Recruit Aharon M. McGhee, U.S. Navy, Navy Medicine Training Support Center, San Antonio, Texas, on active duty, having received a lawful command from Captain Brent M. Kell n, U.S. Navy, his superior commissioned officer, then known by the said Hospitalman Recruit Aharon M. McGhee, to be his superior commissioned officer, to surrender all entertainment portable electric devices and all mobile cellular devices to Command Maste r

- At

- Arms while restricted, or words to thatUnited States v. McGhee No. 201 7 00 291

2 effect, did, at or near San Antonio, Texas, on or about 14 February 2017 and 28 February 2017, willfully disobey the same.

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Celsia Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Formichelli,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
      my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





/s/
                Joseph C. FormichelliJoseph
                C. FormichelliChief
                Executive OfficerMay
                13, 2008
----

----

|   | (1) | the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              | APPLETON PAPERS INC. |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------|
|                              |                 |   |
| Dated:  August 11, 2011 |                 | /s/ Thomas J. Ferree  |
|                              | Name:                | Thomas J. Ferree |
|                              | Title:               | Senior Vice President Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |