alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)**
     I, John M. Meyer, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PSF Group Holdings, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:
     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation: and
     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 8, 2005       /s/ John M. Meyer.     John M Meyer
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J. Craig, Chief Financial Officer of Accenture plc, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 20, 2010



/s/ Pamela J. CraigPamela J. CraigChief Financial Officer of Accenture plc,
general partner of Accenture SCA
(principal financial officer)
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 4.15

                         PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT


                  Between Registrant and Global Financial Press



                                       
<PAGE>   2
                         PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

      This Agreement memorializes an Agreement between Helionetics, Inc., with
its place of business at 6849 Hayvenhurst Avenue, Van Nuys, California 91406
(herein referred to as "Client") and Global Financial Press with his\their place
of business at 250 Park Ave South NY,NY 10003 (herein referred to as
"Employee\Consultant") as through August 1996. In consideration of the mutual
covenants contained herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and
adequacy of which is acknowledged, the parties do hereby agree as follows:

      I.    QUALIFICATION: The Employee has special skill and and experience in
            certain fields of activity in which the Client is interested.

      II.   SERVICES RENDERED: Client engaged the nonexclusive services of
            Employee in 1995\1996 and Employee rendered substantial services to
            Client over the period As Agreed Upon.

      III.  COMPENSATION: The Client issued to Employee an amount of 6,000
            restricted shares of the Client's common stock, in payment in full
            for the aforesaid services rendered through the period agreed upon.

      IV.   ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This document represents the complete agreement
            between the parties and may be modified or amended only by executed
            written agreements. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance
            with the laws of the State of California.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF: The parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of
the day and year noted above.

"Client"                                  "Consultant"
HELIONETICS, INC.



By:/s/ E. MAXWELL MALONE                       /s/ GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRESS
   ---------------------------           -------------------------------------
   E. Maxwell Malone                     Global Financial Press
   Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.2



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Accenture SCA (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry L. You, Chief Financial Officer of
Accenture Ltd, the general partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    HARRY L. YOUHarry L. YouChief Financial OfficerDated: July 15, 2003




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Aircraft

SUPPORTED BATTERY

DJI 5200mAh LiPo Battery

WEIGHT (BATTERY & PROPELLERS INCLUDED)

1242g

HOVER ACCURACY (READY TO FLY)

Vertical: 0.8m; Horizontal: 2.5m

MAX YAW ANGULAR VELOCITY

200°/s

MAX TILTABLE ANGLE

35°

MAX ASCENT / DESCENT SPEED

Ascent: 6m/s; Descent: 2m/s

MAX FLIGHT SPEED

15m/s (Not Recommended)

DIAGONAL MOTOR-MOTOR DISTANCE

350mm

Gimbal

WORKING CURRENT

Static : 750mA; Dynamic : 900mA

CONTROL ACCURACY

±0.03°

CONTROLLABLE RANGE

Pitch : -90°-0°

MAXIMUM ANGULAR SPEED

Pitch : 90°/s

Camera

OPERATING ENVIRONMENT TEMPERATURE

0°C-40°C

SENSOR SIZE

1/2.3"

EFFECTIVE PIXELS

14 Megapixels

RESOLUTION

4384×3288
HD RECORDING

1080p30 & 720p

RECORDING FOV

110° / 85°

Remote 

Control

OPERATING FREQUENCY

5.728 GHz-5.85 GHz

COMMUNICATION DISTANCE (OPEN AREA)

CE Compliance: 400m; FCC Compliance: 800m

RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (1%PER)

-93dBm

TRANSMITTER POWER

CE Compliance: 25mW; FCC Compliance: 100mW

WORKING VOLTAGE

120 mA@3.7V

BUILT-IN LIPO BATTERY WORKING CURRENT/CAPACITY

3.7V, 2000mAh

Range 

Extender

OPERATING FREQUENCY

2412-2462MHz

COMMUNICATION DISTANCE (OPEN AREA)

500-700m

TRANSMITTER POWER

20dBm

POWER CONSUMPTION

2W

DJI VISION 

App

SYSTEM REQUIREMENT OF MOBILE DEVICE

iOS version 6.1 or above/ Android system version 4.0 or above

MOBILE DEVICE SUPPORT

 iOS recommended: iPhone 4s, iPhone 5, iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPod touch 5 

(available but not recommended: iPad 3, iPad 4, iPad mini)

 Android recommended: Samsung Galaxy S3, S4, Note 2, Note 3 or phones of similar 

configuration
AFS-10-311-E 

Jul 09 2010 

 Exemption No. 131L 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-9519 

Lt. Colonel Timothy M. Kersey 

Chief, Flight Standards Division 

Department of the Air Force 

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 

Dear Lt. Col. Kersey: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 131, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

On June 10, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of the 

U.S. Air Force (USAF) for an extension of Exemption No. 131, as amended. That exemption 

from § 91.159 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the USAF to conduct its 

hurricane reconnaissance flights without maintaining the appropriate cruising altitudes as 

prescribed by § 91.159. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the USAF. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 131, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, 

under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. § 40109, which the FAA Administrator has 
2

delegated to me, I grant your petition. Notwithstanding the provisions of the exemption, the 

pilot of an aircraft engaged in the above operations is not relieved of the responsibility to see 

and avoid other aircraft as required by other provisions of the regulations. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 131, as amended, to 

September 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 131, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 131. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Elizabeth Ray 

Director, Airspace and Aeronautical Information Managment
Exhibit 99.2


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of PFS Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                      /s/Stuart M. Suggs
                                      -----------------------------------
                                      Name: Stuart M . Suggs
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 14, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PFS Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by PFS Bancorp, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              61
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,111
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,540
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,455
<LOANS>                                         23,267
<ALLOWANCE>                                         44
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,835
<DEPOSITS>                                      26,951
<SHORT-TERM>                                        70
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                267
<LONG-TERM>                                        754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  30,835
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,807
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  373
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   178
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,359
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,541
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,592
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              767
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       44
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    113
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                          86
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        86
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.55
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    98
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       31
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  111
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               111
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Molichem  Medicines,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the three  months  ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Gilles  Cloutier,  Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;


          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ Gilles Cloutier
-----------------------------------
Name:  Gilles Cloutier
Title:    Chief Executive and Financial Officer
Date:    June 3, 2003




                                       22
<PAGE>   1
 
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
Presley Homes (formerly The Presley Companies)
 
     State of Incorporation: California
 
Presley CMR, Inc.
 
     State of Incorporation: California
 
HSP Inc.
 
     State of Incorporation: California
 
Presley Mortgage Company
 
     State of Incorporation: California
 
Presley Southwest, Inc.
 
     State of Incorporation: Arizona
 
Other names under which The Presley Companies conducts business:
 
     Presley of Southern California
     Presley of Northern California
     Presley of San Diego
     Presley of Central California
     Presley of Arizona
     Presley of Illinois
     Presley of New Mexico
     Presley of Nevada
     Presley of the Southwest
     Carmel Mountain Ranch
     Presley Sports Management Group
     Palm Desert Resorter
     Horsethief Canyon Partners
     BCED/Presley Corona Hills
     Sun Lakes Country Club
     American Self Storage
     Oakhurst Country Club
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docke t No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

(f.,•ou make clwnges to the l'lt!ues in the whle helo11·. you 1111/St ensure the totals llfJdote according/!'. ({ 

the.1· do not. click (or Tah) into and then our (?I tlu! changed cell. 

Estima ted Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) 

Do (inc lude cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h par1s) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Modification 20 $5,320 5 

ev , o n nt 1 

M4 ' n-t. flft>c.. rr.A ..._. 

( 

.. 

I 

I 

.. I 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. neet: $35,100 

Costs covered under warranty (if/mown) $ 

O n-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

If I 

Special consider·atioos for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a .. significant regulatory action .. ? G 

YES*0 0~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* D NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Rcgulator·y Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantia l number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES O O~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? G) 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cal-Bay International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.





                              /s/ Robert  Thompson
                              -------------------------
                              Chief  Executive  Officer
                              August  9,  2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

BY 

No. 85761 

DEC 1 L 2022 

ELEAB A. BROWN 

CLE F PREME COURI 

CLERK 

BONNIE NYBERG QUAINTANCE, AN 

INDIVIDUAL IN HER OWN BEHALF 

AND AS THE SPECIAL 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE 

OF GARY ALDEN QUAINTANCE, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF 

CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE 

DAVID M. JONES, DISTRICT JUDGE, 

Respondents, 

and 

THE PALMER LAW FIRM P.C., A 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION; AND 

RICHARD B. HERMAN, P.C., A 

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, 

Real Parties in Interest. 

ORDER DENYING PETITION 

FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION 

This emergency petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition 

seeks a stay pending appeal, in light of the district court's failure to hear a 

stay motion filed below before the morning of an evidentiary hearing. 

Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, 

we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention 

is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 

P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the 

burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. 

Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ 

2 z - 3 gct.C1 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A aneilW• 
relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in 

determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Writ relief is available 

only when there is no plain, adequate, and speedy legal remedy, Pan, 120 

Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841; NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330, and here, petitioner 

may move for a stay in her appeal, which was docketed in this court last 

week. Nelson v. Heer, 121 Nev. 832, 122 P.3d 1252 (2005), as modified (Jan. 

25, 2006); NRAP 8. Thus, petitioner has an adequate legal remedy 

precluding writ relief. Moreover, we are not inclined to intervene before the 

district court has had an opportunity to consider petitioner's stay motion. 

See NRAP 8(a); TRP Fund VI, LLC v. PHH Mortg. Corp., 138 Nev. Advi Op. 

21, 506 P.3d 1056 (2022). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the petition DENIED. 

ACa. 

Hardesty 

Al4C;•,—.0 

Stiglich 

J. 

Herndon 

cc: Hon. David M. Jones, District Judge 

Hatfield & Associates, Ltd. 

Law Office of Mary F. Chapman, Ltd. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A 

2