alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1752 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1752

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt full-time registered 
nurses, physician assistants, and expanded-function dental auxiliaries 
   from restrictions on remunerated outside professional activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1996

Mr. Simpson (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt full-time registered 
nurses, physician assistants, and expanded-function dental auxiliaries 
   from restrictions on remunerated outside professional activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That except as 
otherwise expressly provided, whenever in this Act an amendment is 
expressed in terms of an amendment to a section or other provision, the 
reference shall be considered to be made to a section or other 
provision of title 38, United States Code.
    Sec. 2. Section 7423 is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b) by striking paragraph (1) and 
        redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (5), and (6) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5);
            (2) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e), and (f) as 
        subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
        subsection (c):
    ``(c) A physician, dentist, podiatrist, or optometrist appointed as 
a full-time employee under this title (other than an intern or resident 
appointed pursuant to section 7406 of this title) may not assume 
responsibility for the medical care of any patient other than a patient 
admitted for treatment at a Department facility, except in those cases 
where the appointee, upon request and with the approval of the Under 
Secretary for Health, assumes such responsibilities to assist 
communities or medical practice groups to meet medical needs which 
would not otherwise be met for a period not to exceed 180 calendar 
days, which may be extended by the Under Secretary for Health for 
additional periods not to exceed 180 calendar days each.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
                        
                     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         276,095
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  37,213
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    241,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               564,797
<PP&E>                                         94,530
<DEPRECIATION>                                 23,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 738,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          163,405
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    500
<COMMON>                                       378
<OTHER-SE>                                     556,357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   738,305
<SALES>                                        676,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               676,716
<CGS>                                          547,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,352,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,341,181)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,341,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,341,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.63)
        


</TABLE>
Regulator)' EYaluation
Docket No. 

## FAA-)otC: -oot,f Directorate ldcntilicr:

li**'''''''!"~'·,)uti!?<'''** roth,· r,Iiucs mrlh' luN,, /1,-/mi·. ynumml <"11.\11!"(' Jh,· futu/.1 IIJ!d«h' d1 ("linlin.'.!.h I! 1/h '\ · , In lint. i !i. ·k 1' 'I" I uh 1 into /Ill< IIih'll 11111 o/ Ifl,• , 11ull/.!,< •dcd/. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per llroduct (e.g
.. ai1·cmn. engine. (c .g.. Inspcction. 

### I propeller. apnliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost n.:p!aCL'"!\lent) (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s. !Or U.S. Fleet /Jo rwf i11d11de oncom/ilion t·osts here**acccs~.** testing. (@$85/h parts) Registered and c!osc-upl our) Products Order and install replacement cross 

### 1.0 

# so 1.307 

### fitting per CSB 1307



### ----- 

## ____ j**-------·-·~--··---·-·-·--·-** 

### ----

--------------------..

### - .... 

### -



### I 

## I 

# I 

# ! I



### -

' 

# ' The known number ofproducts in complia111.:c: Total Costs**ofcon~[J!iancc** for U.S. t1ect: $111.095 Costs covered under wnrrantv 

### (i/knmm) $
On-Condition Costs:

## ~ Action Work-hours Labor cos! Pans Cost Cost per Product (e.g
.. hlSjk<.:tion. (indudc access. (@SRS/hour)

r('p!accmcnt) testing. and closeUP) 

### I 

## I I I Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use lhix.fiddto exploi11**(111_1'fftin~** in 1he F.stimated Costs whle that \1'(/S (/,\SI/IIIed Ill" mi.!!,hi //()/ he oh\'ioux. 'lhis!idd Cll/111{.\'(/be used/(} c.tpfnill \\'(//'/"11111_1' cos/s): 

### The cost 0 

# rthe

### labor and parts will be covered by CMI warranty. Estimated total labor is 2 hours. CMI warranty 

### only covers one hour 

### or labor. Executive Order I2866: 

## @ Could 

### the AD be considered 

### a "signi11cant regulatory 

### action""?
__***[~planation;** 

### DOT H.cgulatOI)-' 

### Policies and Pmcctlurcs: Is 

### the AD signilicant'? 

# ***l~xplanat**

### ion: 

# "'"'

. 

# -**Rcgulatot~'** Flexibility Act: YES' 

## D NO 

## IZl

YES' 

## D NO 

## IZl

\Viii the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number 

### ofsmall entities? Explain for either a Y cs or No

# answer.~ YES 

# 0 NO 

# IZJ Explanation: lntnlsllltc Aviation in Alaslm: 

### This AD could aiTcct intrasl<ltc aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include 

### specific requirements for 

# """' aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation'?**~** YES' 

## D NO 

## IZl *Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,750
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,621
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          14,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,574
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,945,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         18,189
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           307
<OTHER-SE>                                     253,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,945,932
<SALES>                                        180,763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,759
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               161,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              98,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,929
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.54


</TABLE>
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  TRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATION
  California
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
    
    333-126538
(Commission File Number)
    
    33-0356705
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 7711 Center Avenue, Suite 100
Huntington Beach, California 92647
 (714) 373-8300
 
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.Item 1.02 Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement.SIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
   
 Item 1.02 Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement.




---



##### Table of Contents








---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  TRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATIONDate: June 23, 2008
    /s/ Timothy M. OConnorName:
    Timothy M. OConnorTitle:
    Senior Vice President
[No. 35273.

Department One.

March 31, 1960.]

#### Edwin B. Udhus *et al., Respondents,*v. Sylvia M. Peglow *et al., Appellants.**1*

*Ferguson*& *Bur dell*(W. *Wesselhoeft,*of counsel), for appellants.

*J. Marvin Jonsson,*for respondents.

1

Reported, in 350 P. (2d) 640.

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs Udhus sought to recover damages against the defendants Peglow for personal injuries arising out of an automobile collision at the intersection of arterial highway No. 99 (alternate) and Emander road, near Everett. The case was tried to the court. The court found that the defendant driver was negligent and that her negligence was the proximate cause of the collision. Relative to contributory negligence, the court found

> “That plaintiff, Edwin Udhus, entered the aforesaid intersection at a rate of speed in excess of 35 miles per hour in violation of RCW 46.48.021; that said speed was not a proximate cause of the accident.”

*847From a judgment entered for plaintiffs, the defendants have appealed.

Appellants assign error to the court’s finding that respondents’ excessive speed was not a proximate cause of the accident. There was conflicting testimony as to the distance the respondents’ automobile was from the intersection at the time the appellants’ automobile came into view. The distance was determinative of the question of whether respondents’ speed was a contributing cause of the accident.

One witness testified that the respondents’ automobile was twenty-five to thirty feet from the intersection when appellants’ automobile came into view, which, according to the only expert witness, was an insufficient distance to have enabled respondent driver to avoid the collision, had he been driving at thirty-five miles an hour. Another witness testified that the distance was sixty feet, which distance, according to the expert, was sufficient to have enabled respondent driver to avoid the collision.

It is the province of the trier of the facts to weigh the testimony of the witnesses, and this court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts upon a disputed issue of fact. *Fallin v. Fallin,*54 Wn. (2d) 370, 340 P. (2d) 791 (1959), and case cited; *Welliever v. MacNulty,*50 Wn. (2d) 224, 310 P. (2d) 531 (1957).

The judgment is affirmed.
| (1)   | the              Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Axial Vector Engine Corporation              for the              quarter ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements              of              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the              information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the              quarter ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents in all material respects,              the financial condition and results of operations of Axial Vector Engine              Corporation. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                Dr. Raymond                Brouzes                                 |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Dr.                Raymond Brouzes                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|  Title:    |  Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director                                                                                                                                                          |
|  Date:     |  February                14, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: COUNTY OF CARBON TAX

CLAIM BUREAU JUDICIAL SALE OF

LAND IN THE COUNTY OF CARBON

FREE AND DISCHARGED FROM ALL
TAX AND MUNICIPAL CLAIMS, MORTGAGES, LIEN CHARGES, AND ESTATES WHATSOEVER, HELD NOVEMBER 6, 2015

Respondent

v.

CARBON COUNTY TAX CLAIM
BUREAU,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 402 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

IN RE: COUNTY OF CARBON TAX

CLAIM BUREAU JUDICIAL SALE OF

LAND IN THE COUNTY OF CARBON

FREE AND DISCHARGED FROM ALL
TAX AND MUNICIPAL CLAIMS, MORTGAGES, LIEN CHARGES, AND ESTATES WHATSOEVER, HELD NOVEMBER 6, 2015

Re spondent

v.

CARBON COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU, FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 403 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court[ 402 MAL 2018, 403 MAL 2018 and 404 MAL 2018 ]

- 2

IN RE: COUNTY OF CARBON TAX

CLAIM BUREAU JUDICIAL SALE OF

LAND IN THE COUNTY OF CARBON

FREE AND DISCHARGED FROM ALL
TAX AND MUNICIPAL CLAIMS, MORTGAGES, LIEN CHARGES, AND ESTATES WHATSOEVER, HELD NOVEMBER 6, 2015

Respondent

v.

CARBON COUNTY TAX C LAIM
BUREAU,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 404 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of November, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7452

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WALLACE THOMAS LESTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00169-D-1)

Submitted: March 29, 2022 Decided: April 1, 2022

Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wallace Thomas Lester, Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Lucy Partain Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wallace Thomas Lester appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) motion for compassionate release based on the COVID-19 

pandemic. We review the district court’s order for abuse of discretion. See United States 

v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Upon review 

of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying 

Lester’s motion. See United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 187-91 (4th Cir. 2021). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                   FORM 8-K/A


                                 CURRENT REPORT


     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


       Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) November 1, 1996
                                                        ----------------

                                   DMI, Inc.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter


        COLORADO                    0-19875                    95-3500183
        --------                    -------                    ----------
(State of incorporation)     (Commission File Number)         (IRS Employer
                                                         Identification Number)


                     2501 W. Fifth St. Santa Ana, CA 92703
                     --------------------------------------
                     Address of principal executive offices


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code 714-571-1900
                                                           ------------

                                      None
                                      ----
          Former name or former address, if changed since last report
<PAGE>   2

ITEM 1.  CHANGES IN CONTROL OF REGISTRANT

         None

ITEM 2.  ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF ASSETS

         None

ITEM 3.  BANKRUPTCY OR RECEIVERSHIP

         None

ITEM 4.  CHANGE IN REGISTRANT'S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

         On November 1, 1996, the registrant's accountant, Coopers & Lybrand
         resigned. The resignation was not because of any disagreements on any
         matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
         disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.
         
         Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.'s reports on the Company's financial
         statements as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and for the years then
         ended, included an explanatory paragraph addressing the uncertainty of
         the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

ITEM 5.  OTHER EVENTS

         None

ITEM 6.  RESIGNATION OF REGISTRANT'S DIRECTORS

         None

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

         EXHIBIT NUMBER         EXHIBIT
         --------------         -------

              16.1              Letter from Coopers & Lybrand dated 
                                November 1, 1996

              16.2              Letter from Coopers & Lybrand dated
                                December 3, 1996

ITEM 8.  CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR

         None

<PAGE>   3
                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

DMI, Inc.

/s/ DUNCAN MACDONALD                                12/10/96
--------------------------                    ----------------------
Duncan MacDonald                             Date
Secretary
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly report of Megola, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joel Gardner, acting
in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Joel GardnerJoel
      GardnerCEO
      and CFOJanuary
      26, 2009