alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended August 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ray C. Davis, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 12, 2005



/s/ Ray C. DavisRay C. DavisCo-Chief Executive Officer


---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended August 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: December 12, 2005



/s/ Kelcy L. WarrenKelcy L. WarrenCo-Chief Executive Officer


---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Renovo Holdings (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Carnes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| */s/Stephen Carnes         * |  
Stephen Carnes

 
Chief Executive Officer and Principal

Financial Officer

 

August 18, 2005

 

 

 

 

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.42


                                                               CERBIOS-PHARMA SA

                                    RELEASE
                                    -------

This  release  is made as of the 27 day  of  March, 1997  by  Cerbios-Pharma  SA
("Cerbios") in favour of Bigmar, Inc., Bigmar Pharmaceuticals SA, Bioren SA, and
Bigmar Therapeutics, Inc. (collectively "Bigmar").

1.   Settlement of Invoices

     Cerbios had previously sent to Bigmar certain invoices for charges alleged
     to be due to Cerbios from Bigmar, including the following:

     No. 190896 - SFr. 418'132.85 No. 961002 - SFr. 259'328.25 No. 031296 - SFr.
     163'792.75
     and also  notified  on March 3, 1997 to  Richard  Eisner & Company  further
     claims alleged to be due to Cerbios from Bigmar.

     The claims of Cerbios  reflected  in the  invoices  as well as in the above
     mentioned  letter to Richard  Eisner & Company have been settled by payment
     through  a bank  cheque  from  Bigmar  to  Cerbios  in the  amount  of SFr.
     410'000.-.  Cerbios has voided all of the invoices  and of the other claims
     mentioned  in the above  letter of March 3,  1997,  and has  accepted  such
     payment in full settlement of any and all mentioned claims against Bigmar.

2.   General Release

     Cerbios  does  hereby  release,  relieve  and  discharge  Bigmar  and their
     directors,  officers,  employees and agents from any and all losses, claims
     and causes of action  that  Cerbios may have  against  any of such  persons
     based upon any matter,  act or omission  occurring or arising at time prior
     to the date hereof  connected with the above mentioned  invoices as well as
     with the other  claims  mentioned  in the above  letter of March 3, 1997 to
     Richard Eisner & Company.

3.   No Admission of Liability

     The  settlement  referred to under par. 1 above is a compromise  settlement
     and neither this Release nor the settlement  payment shall constitute or be
     construed as an admission of liability by any party.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  Release  has been  executed as of the date first set
forth above.

CERBIOS-PHARMA SA

By   /s/
    ----------------------

Its: PRESIDENT
    ----------------------



<PAGE>
##### 



1.
    
    The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and2.
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Alan J. FohrerAlan J. FohrerChief Executive Officer
Southern California Edison Company/s/ Thomas M. NoonanThomas M. NoonanChief Financial Officer
Southern California Edison Company
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star e Media Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Frank Bevacqua, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
  Dated: September 8, 2003
/s/ Joseph Frank BevacquaBy: Joseph Frank BevacquaIts: Chief Financial Officer 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Star e Media Corporation and will be retained by Star e Media Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In Re: Jonathan T. HOUGH, Petitioner.

No. 03-6021.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 5, 2003.

Jonathan T. Hough, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan T. Hough petitions for a writ of mandamus requesting that we vacate a magistrate judge’s order denying his motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, which remains pending in the district court.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. *See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *See In re United Steelworkers,*595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979).

With these standards in mind, we conclude Hough fails to establish he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny his petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
Opinion issued March 8 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 17
- 00033
- CV

——————————— ANAMBRA STATE COMMUN ITY IN HOUSTON , Appella nt V. ANAMBRA STATE COMMUN ITY, HOUSTON , Appell e e
On Appeal from the 295th Distri ct Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2010
- 76740

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an appeal from a final judgment after a bench trial. Appellee Anambra State Community, Houston was awarded $9,150 in actual damages based on findings of fraud and co nversion. This appeal has been pursued by the defendant at trial, Anambra State Community in Houston. We affirm.2

Appellant purports to raise two issues. T he first issue questions “Whether Appellee/Plaintiff provided evidence to prove that defendant commit ted fraud and conversion.” Reading this liberally as a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, it fails. The judgment identifies fraud and conversion as separate grounds to support the award of $9,150 in actual damages. The evidentiary challenge to t he conversion claim is inadequate to preserve an appellate challenge. Without identifying any particular element that is unsupported by evidence, the brief nakedly asserts: “Appellee herein has not presented any evidence that will allow for recovering on i ts conversion claim.” We hold that appellant has waived his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conversion claim. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 38.1(i). Because the conversion claim supports all the relief granted in the judgment, we need not sep arately address the fraud claim (which features similar briefing deficiencies). T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 47.1. Appellant’s remaining issue asks: “Whether the membership of [Anambra State Community] ‘IN’ Houston followed its constitution in ousting Christian Ulasi and incorporating the association as indicated in its constitution.” Appellant presents no argument to explain how answering this question leads to any relief from the judgment. Moreover, the brief fails to identify evidence in the trial record sufficient to support its assertion that Ulasi was removed from office.3

The judgment is AFFIRMED. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown.
Ms. Gwendolyn Keyes Fleming Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3 104 Dear Ms. Fleming: 

Re: Mississippi SIP Revision and amendments to state air regulations 

Enclosed are rulemaking documents related to a State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision and 

amendments to state air pollution control regulations. We are transmitting, under separate cover, 

additional copies to Dick Schutt of your agency. 

On October 28, 2010, the Mississibpi Commission on Environmental Quality adopted a SIP 

Revision and associated state air pollution control regulations to incorporate the Greenhouse Gas 

Tailoring Rule. The enclosed SIP Revision updates Mississippi's incorporation by reference in 

"Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality", APC-S-5 to adopt 

regulatory changes as promulgated in the Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule (75 FR 3 15 14) as well as 

other recent updates to the federal PSD regulations. However, we have specifically excluded the 

New Source Review PM2.5 Implementation Rule provisions from this rulemaking and we expect to 

submit a separate proposal addressing the PM2.5 provisions at a later date. 

Additional rulemaking documents included in this transmittal are amendments to Mississippi's Title 

V permitting regulations entitled "Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of 

Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act", APC-S-6 in order to incorporate EPA's Greenhouse Tailoring 

Rule and amendments to state regulations entitled "Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, 

Abatement, and Control of Air Contaminants", APC-S-1 to update state adoption, by reference, of 

Federal New Source Performance Standards, National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants, and the Consolidated Air Rule. 

We certify that this SIP revision and the regulation amendments have been completed in 

accordance with the Mississippi Administrative Procedures Act and the Mississippi Pollution 

Control Law. We further certify that a public hearing was held to receive comments regarding the 

SIP Revision. 
Very truly yours, ~xechtive Director 

TDF:jar 

Enclosures 

cc: Ms. Beverly Banister 

Director APTMD, EPA Region IV
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          41,839
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,019
<PP&E>                                          69,521
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,876
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 258,817
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,280
<BONDS>                                        314,835
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                    (68,699)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (68,688)
<SALES>                                         26,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,259
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,522<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,419)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (137,515)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (137,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,868)<F2>
<NET-INCOME>                                 (139,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (13.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (13.41)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS OF $63,900.
<F2>DUE TO ADOPTION OF SOP 98-5, "REPORTIN ON THE COST OF START-UP ACTIVITIES."
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0088

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LEWIS LEON BRYSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 13, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 4 2023

08/04/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0088
Exhibit 99.2


              Annual Statement of PHH Mortgage Services Corporation

PHH Mortgage Services
6000 Atrium Way
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054

March 28, 1997

Jay Strauss
Nomura Securities
2 World Financial Center
New York, New York 10281

RE:  Officer's Certificate
     Nomura Securities

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned officer certifies the following for the 1996 calendar year:

a)   I have reviewed the activities and performances of the Servicer during the
     preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
     Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide and to
     the best of my knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
     responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements throughout such
     year;

b)   I have confirmed that the Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC
     Servicer in good standing;

c)   I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance
     Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing
     Agreement, Trust Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or
     Servicer Guide are in full force and effect;

d)   All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance Policy (if
     applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable), with
     respect to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid and such insurance
     policies are in full force and effect;

e)   All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other expenses
     accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance
     on any Mortgaged Property, have been paid;

f)   All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

g)   All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgaged Property
     required per section 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code,
     respectively, have been prepared and filed.


Certified by:


/s/ Judith P. Kent
Judith P. Kent, Vice President
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gerald O. Hatler, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Gerald O. Hatler                 
|Gerald O. Hatler                     
|President and Chief Executive Officer

November 5, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-Q
    November 20, 2008Date

By

/s/ Kent W. PetersKent
    W. Peters

Chief Executive Officer
    (principal executive officer)   Form 10-Q
## 9Wl 

# eJi/1, !Band oj,.falre**Supe~tiwt,** 

## e&ppewa :JtuliaM

July 3, 2014
Mr. Fred Leutner Office ofScience & Technology (Mail Code 4305T) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 88385 Pike Road Bayfield, WI 54814 Phone: 715-779-3700 Fax: 715-779-3704 Email: redcliff@redcliff-nsn.gov 

# Red CliffTribal Council "The Hub 

# of the Chippewa**Nation~~**

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20460 E-mail Leutner.Fred@epa. gov
RE: Potential Reinterpretation ofthe Clean Water Act (CWA) Provisions regarding Treatment in a Similar Manner to States (TAS)
Dear Mr. Leutner: Ithas come to Red CliffBand ofLake Superior Chippewas' attention that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering a Reinterpretation ofthe rules governing the burden placed on tribes applying for TAS under the CW A for Section 303( c), Water Quality Standards. Currently, tribes must demonstrate their own inherent regulatory authority, which is challenging and resource intensive. This burden alone has cost tribes both time and funds to meet this requirement. The potential reinterpretation would eliminate the "Montana Test" by stating that CW A Section 518 is a delegation by Congress to eligible tribes to administer CW A regulatory programs over their entire reservations regardless ofland ownership, and it will allow tribes to exercise their sovereignty by our ability and willingness to accept this delegation.
We have applied to EPA forTAS under the CW A for section 319. It took us two years, beginning in 2007, and TAS status was finally approved in 2009. We are currently in the process ofapplying for TAS Section 303(c), and have yet to receive TAS for Water Quality Standards on our Reservation.
The Red CliffBand ofLake Superior Chippewas believes EPA's reinterpretation will clarify and strengthen the inherent regulatory authority ofsovereign tribes to implement EPA statutes within reservations regardless ofland ownership. Reinterpretation would validate the legal basis for tribal assertion ofregulatoryjurisdiction under the CW A and decrease the administrative burden ofcase-by-case assessments oftribal authority.

### As Tribal leader ofthe Red CliffBand ofLake Superior Chippewas, I support EPA's efforts to reinterpret provisions ofthe CW A regarding the TAS process. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this potential rule change. Respectfully,

# ~A~~ Rose Gurnoe-Soulier Red CliffTribal Chairperson