alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-24-005]

*Agency Holding the Meeting:*                     United States International Trade Commission.                

# TIME AND DATE: 

February 6, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-685 and 731-TA-1599-1601 and 1603 (Final)(Tin Mill Products from Canada, China, Germany, and South Korea). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on February 20, 2024.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         none.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. Earlier notification of meeting was not possible.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: January 25, 2024.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-01824 Filed 1-25-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William G. Filer II, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ William G. Filer II
----------------------------------------------------
William G. Filer II
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2005
<PAGE>
                              POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints David K. Moskowitz as the true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent of the undersigned, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for and in the name, place and stead of the
undersigned, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of EchoStar Satellite Broadcasting Corporation, a Colorado corporation, for the
year ended December 31, 1997, and any and all amendments thereto and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and hereby grants to
said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection
therewith, as fully as to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be
done by virtue hereof.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
Power Attorney has been signed by the following person in the capacity and on
the date indicated.

<TABLE>
        Signature                    Title               Date
        ---------                    -----               ----
<S>                                <C>                 <C>

/s/ JAMES DEFRANCO                 Director            March 27, 1998
----------------------------
James DeFranco
</TABLE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 15, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-01043-CV PHILIP LOCKHART, Appellant V. TAYNA MARTINEZ, Appellee On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV23-00816 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Goldstein, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Goldstein Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue . After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record , we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and for appellant’s br ief to be filed by April 10, 2024. By postcard dated April 12, 2024, we informed appellant his brie f was overdue and directed appellant to file a brief within te n days. We cautioned a ppellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date , appellant has not file d a brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding th e status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

231043f.p05 / Bonnie Lee Goldstein / BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

PHILIP LOCKHART , Appellant
No. 05-23-01043-CV V. TAYNA MARTINEZ, Appellee On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV23-00816. Opinion delivered by Justice Goldstein, Justices Reichek and Garcia participating.
In accordance with this Court’ s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered May 15, 2024
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.3


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Comprehensive Care
Corporation and Subsidiaries of our report dated August 22, 1994, included in
Comprehensive Care Corporation and Subsidiaries Form 10-K, as amended, for the
year ended May 31, 1996, and to all references to our firm included in this
Registration Statement.  It should be noted that we have not audited any
financial statements of the Company subsequent to May 31, 1994, or performed any
audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.



/s/ Arthur Anderson LLP

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
November 8, 1996
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARCUS EARL WILLIAMS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-50187

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00802-PA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 14, 2015** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Marcus Earl Williams appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 12-month custodial sentence and three-year term of supervision

imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 19 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Williams contends that the district court erred by (i) failing to explain

adequately the sentence imposed, (ii) failing to consider and address his mitigating

arguments, and (iii) relying on clearly erroneous facts. We review for plain error,

see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and

find none. The record reflects that the district court adequately considered

Williams’s mitigating arguments, sufficiently explained the sentence, and did not

rely on any clearly erroneous facts. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992

(9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

Williams also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in

light of the mitigating circumstances surrounding his violation and his alleged

over-incarceration for the underlying offense. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in imposing Williams’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S.

38, 51 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light

of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances,

including Williams’s criminal history and repeated breaches of the court’s trust. 

See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir.

2006).

AFFIRMED.

2 15-50187
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Ms. Kimberly D. Mireles 

Vice President 

Environmental Services 

Luminant Power 

1601 Bryan Street 

Dallas, Texas 75201 

Dear Ms. Mireles: 

OCT 2 1 2014 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Thank you for your letter dated September 17, 2014, on behalf of Luminant Generation Company LLC 

requesting an extension of the closing date for receipt of public comments on the supplemental proposal 

to address affirmative defense provisions in State Implementation Plans, issued by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency on September 5, 2014. The EPA has considered your request, but has 

decided not to extend the comment period beyond the current closing date ofNovember 6, 2014. By this 

letter, I want to notify you of that decision as promptly as possible so that you can plan to submit any 

comments on the supplemental proposal within the time already established. 

We are providing a comment period of 50 days from publication, 62 days from the date of posting the 

pre-publication version on the EPA website, and we believe that the comment period's current closing 

date allows sufficient time for all interested parties to develop and submit comments on the 

supplemental proposal. 

We trust this timely response is helpful and look forward to receiving your comments on the 

supplemental proposal. 

Sincerely, 

Janet G. McCabe 

Acting Assistant Administrator 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                         LSB CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
            AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Sharland,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as added by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2005 and
      results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31,
      2005.

                                                    /s/ John E. Sharland
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                    John E. Sharland
                                                    Senior Vice President
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

                                                    May 13, 2005

                                       25
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 1222 Directorate Identifier: 2010 - NM - 268 - AD **With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?**  (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “ **Ex Parte Contacts** .”) ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE Boeing Bob Irons 11/15/10 Concur. ATA Jo e White 11/19/10 No response .

Other/Additional Information:
SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW  ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned constitutes and appoints
Ernest  C. Garcia, Gregory B. Sullivan, Steven T. Darak and Steven P. Johnson,
and  each  of  them,  his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full
power  of  substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead,  in  any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the  fiscal  year  ended December 31, 1996, for filing with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  by  Ugly  Duckling  Corporation, a Delaware corporation,
together  with  any and all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  granting to such attorneys-in-fact and
agents,  and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every  act  and  thing  requisite  and  necessary  to be done in and about the
premises,  as fully and to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person,  hereby  ratifying  and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or each of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     DATED:  February  14th,  1997


                              /s/  Frank  P.  Willey

STATE  OF  CALIFORNIA  )
                       )  ss.
County  of  Orange     )


On  this 14th day of February, 1997, before me, the undersigned Notary Public,
personally  appeared  Frank P. Willey, known to me to be the person whose name
is  subscribed  to the within instrument and acknowledged that he executed the
same  for  the  purposes  therein  contained.

IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I  hereunto  set  my  hand  and  official  seal.




                              /s/  JoAnn  H.  Campbell
                              Notary  Public


My  commission  expires:    01/20/2001                    {official  seal}











<PAGE>  127
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 6831

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
KENNETH ADAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. ( 1:88

- cr - 00046

- TSE

- 1 )

Submitted : May 30, 2024 Decided: June 3, 2024

Before GREGORY and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kenneth Adams , Appellant Pro Se. Tony Ray Roberts , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6831 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Adams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. United States v. Adams , No.
1:88

- cr - 00046

- TSE

- 1 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 20, 2023 ; entered Apr. 21, 2023 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-6831 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2014

d1217 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2014

149738

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149738

COA: 321407

Barry CC: 13

- 000144

- FH

LONNIE LEE MANN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 4, 2014 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of People

v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the

decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in

that case.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-20022 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. HECTOR ENRIQUE MEJIA-BORJA, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-392-1
Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to repr e s e n t H ector Enrique Mejia-Borja has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in a c c o r d ance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and U n ited States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2 0 1 1 )

. Mejia-Borja has not filed a response. We h ave reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave t o withdraw is GRANTED,

cou n s e l is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-20022 Document: 00512280474 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 5.1

                      [MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP LETTERHEAD]




                               December 20, 1996




MTI Technology Corporation
4905 East La Palma Avenue
Anaheim, CA  92807

Gentlemen:

     At your request, we have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") in connection
with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of an
aggregate of 3,000,000 shares of your common stock (the "Common Shares")
issuable in connection with awards granted pursuant to the 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan ("Plan").  

     As your counsel in connection with the Registration Statement, we have
examined the proceedings taken by you in connection with the adoption of the
Plan and the authorization of the issuance of the Common Shares or awards
(including options to purchase Common Shares, dividend equivalent rights,
restricted stock, performance units, performance shares and other rights or
benefits) under the Plan (the "Plan Shares") and such documents as we have
deemed necessary to render this opinion.  For the purpose of the opinion
rendered below, we have assumed that in connection with issuance of shares under
the Plan, the Company will receive consideration in an amount not less than the
aggregate par value of the Plan Shares covered by each such issuance.

     Based upon and subject to the foregoing, it is our opinion that the Plan
Shares, when issued and outstanding pursuant to the terms of the Plan, will be
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable Common Shares.  

     We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration 
Statement.  

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        /s/ Morrison & Foerster LLP
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                               STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
                                               --------------------------------------------
                 SUBSIDIARY                           OR ORGANIZATION/TYPE OF ENTITY
                 ----------                           ------------------------------

<S>                                            <C>
American General Hospitality Operating         Delaware/Limited Partnership
 Partnership, L.P.

AGH UPREIT LLC                                 Delaware/Limited Liability Company

AGH SECAUCUS LLC                               Delaware/Limited Liability Company

AGH DFW South LLC                              Delaware/Limited Liability Company

2929 Williams Limited Liability                Delaware/Limited Liability Company
   Company

AGH 75 Arlington Heights LLC                   Delaware/Limited Liability Company

AGH 2780 Atlanta LLC                           Delaware/Limited Liability Company

AGH O'Hare International LLC                   Delaware/Limited Liability Company

Mt. Arlington New Jersey, LLC                  Delaware/Limited Liability Company

Portland/Shelton LLC                           Delaware/Limited Liability Company

AGH Portland/Shelton LLC                       Delaware/Limited Liability Company

BCHI Acquisition, LLC                          Delaware/Limited Liability Company

AGH GP, Inc.                                   Nevada/Corporation

AGH LP, Inc.                                   Nevada/Corporation

Portland/Shelton Corp.                         Delaware/Corporation

AGH PSS I, Inc.                                Delaware/Corporation

3100 Glendale Joint Venture                    Ohio/General Partnership

MDV Limited Partnership                        Texas/Limited Partnership

Madison Motel Associates                       Wisconsin/General Partnership

183 Hotel Associates, Ltd.                     Texas/Limited Partnership

Richmond Williamsburg Associates, Ltd.         Texas/Limited Partnership

455 Meadowlands Associates, Ltd.               Texas/Limited Partnership

DFW South I Limited Partnership                Texas/Limited Partnership

2780 Atlanta Limited Partnership, L.P.         Delaware/Limited Partnership

</TABLE>