alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 11, 2015

Mr. Murad Bilal

866 N. Benson Road Fairfield, CT 06824

Dear Mr. Bilal :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 29, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 2015), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0000398 14-OCT-2013 10:02 AM
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 134 (Tuesday, July 14, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40954-40955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-17059]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2014-0626; FRL-9930-26-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico; 
Revisions to the Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5) 
Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permitting Program State 
Implementation Plan (SIP)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve portions of two revisions to the New Mexico SIP for the 
permitting of PM2.5 emissions submitted on May 23, 2011, and 
August 6, 2014. Together, these submittals revise the New Mexico PSD 
program to be consistent with the federal PSD regulations regarding the 
use of a significant impact level (SIL) or significant monitoring 
concentration (SMC) for PM2.5 emissions. We are proposing to 
approve these SIP revisions to regulate PM2.5 emissions in 
accordance with requirements of section 110 and part C of the Clean Air 
Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 13, 2015.

[[Page 40955]]

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Ms. Adina Wiley, Air Planning 
Section (6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Ste. 1200, Dallas, TX 75202-2733. Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Adina Wiley, 214-665-2115, 
wiley.adina@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittals as a direct rule 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this 
action no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do 
so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: June 30, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-17059 Filed 7-13-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GROUP ALMAX, LLC
, Appellant,

v.

2500 RECEIVER, INC.
, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 0873

[ May 16, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16

- 20240.

Michael J. Schlesinger of Schlesinger Law Group

, Miami, and Geoffrey B. Marks of the Law Offices of Geoffrey B. Ma rks, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Steven H

. Osber of Conrad & Scherer, LLP

, Fort Lauderdale

, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., W ARNER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO OPTEK
CORPORATION'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                         115,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,911
<INVENTORY>                                     75,088
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               290,468
<PP&E>                                          80,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 594,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          242,720
<BONDS>                                         96,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           485
<OTHER-SE>                                     236,016
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   594,174
<SALES>                                        283,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               283,362
<CGS>                                          156,388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  156,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,969
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,538
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,025
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,652
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,754
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,754
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and chief executive officer of
First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: November 13, 2002 | /s/ JAMES J. BAUMBERGER                                  
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                        |                                                          
|                        | James J. Baumberger President and chief executive officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Bernard F. Denoyer, certify that:

1)    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2)    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



Date: May 16, 2011

/s/ BERNARD F. DENOYER Bernard F. Denoyer Senior Vice President, Finance


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.21


                              AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE
            TO THE POST PROPERTIES, INC. PROFIT SHARING/sec. 401(K) PLAN
             AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 1994


        Pursuant to sec. 13.1 of the Post Properties, Inc. Profit Sharing/sec.
401(k) Plan as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 1984 ("Plan"),
Post Properties, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows:

                                       1.

        By amending sec. 3.19, Forfeiture, to substitute "sec. 8.4" for "sec.
8.5" where it appears in such section.

                                       2.

        By amending sec. 6.1, Plan Sponsor and Company Action, to delete the
last paragraph of such section.

                                       3.

        By amending sec. 6.5, Account Debits and Allocation of Adjustment, to
add the following sentence to the end of such section:

         "For purposes of allocating the Adjustment for any Valuation Date, the
         balance of an Account shall include the Before-Tax Contributions
         credited to such Accounts as of such Valuation Date but shall exclude
         the Profit Sharing Contributions credited to such Account as of such
         Valuation Date."

                                       4.

        By amending subsection (2) of sec. 8.4(d), Forfeiture, to read as
follows:

         "(2) the last day of the Plan Year in which the Employee's employment
         as such terminates, unless he or she is reemployed as an Employee on or
         before such date."




<PAGE>



                                       5.

        By amending sec. 13.1, Amendment, to add the following sentence to the
end of such section:

        "Any amendments to the Plan shall be in writing and shall be signed by
        the Chairman or the President of the Plan Sponsor or their delegate."

                                       6.

        This Amendment Number One shall be effective retroactively to January
1, 1994.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Post Properties, Inc. has executed this Amendment
Number One this 15th day of July, 1994.



  (CORPORATE SEAL)                               POST PROPERTIES, INC.

                                                 By:/s/
                                                    ---------------------------

                                                 Title: Sr. Vice President
ATTEST:/s/ Sherry W. Cohen                             ------------------------
       -------------------------
Title: Sr. V.P. & Secretary
       -------------------------




                                      -2-
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6273

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMISON J. MORTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:05-cr-00409-REP-1; 3:08-cv-00831)

Submitted: June 30, 2011 Decided: July 6, 2011

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamison J. Morton, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamison J. Morton seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Morton has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (“GlobeTrac”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John daCosta,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of GlobeTrac, certify, pursuant to s.906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of GlobeTrac.






*/s/
      John daCosta*


John
      daCosta


Chief
      Executive Officer






August
      11, 2006






**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (“GlobeTrac”) on Form
      10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John daCosta,
      Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of GlobeTrac, certify,
      pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
      condition and result of operations of GlobeTrac.






*/s/
      John daCosta*


John
      daCosta


Chief
      Financial Officer




August
      11, 2006
Exhibit 10.1
 AMENDMENT
TO
AMENDED AND RESTATED
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 AMENDMENT
 Recitals
 A.
 B.
 C.
 Agreement
 Now, Therefore,
 1. Definitions.
 2. Amendments to Loan Agreement.
 2.1 Revolving Advances and Credit Extensions.
 Revolving Advances
 Availability
 -1-




---



##### 



Streamline Period
 Termination; Repayment
 Overadvance.
 Letters of Credit Sublimit
  -2-




---



##### 



-3-




---



##### 



Foreign Exchange Sublimit
 Cash Management Services Sublimit
 -4-




---



##### 



2.2 Interest.
 (a) Delete LIBOR Option.
 (b) Interest Provisions.
 Payment of Interest on the Credit Extensions
 Interest Rate; Advances
 Default Rate
 Adjustment to Interest Rate
 360-Day Year
 -5-




---



##### 



Debit of Accounts
 Payment; Interest Computation
 2.3 Financial Covenants.
 Financial Covenants
 Quick Ratio
 Adjusted Net Profit
 2.4 Permitted Stock Repurchase. The portion of
    -6-




---



##### 



2.5 Financial Statements, Reports, Certificates.
 Financial Statements, Reports, Certificates
    -7-




---



##### 



2.6 Defined Terms.
 Adjusted Net Profit
 Advance Advances
 Availability Amount
 -8-




---



##### 



Borrowing Base
 Business Day
 Eligible Accounts
       -9-




---



##### 



-10-




---



##### 



Maximum Dollar Amount
 Modified Current Liabilities
 Revolving Advance Revolving Advances
 Revolving Line
 Revolving Line Maturity Date
 -11-




---



##### 



2.7 Compliance Certificate.
 3. Limited Waiver.
 4. Limitation of Amendments.
 4.1
 4.2
 5. Representations and Warranties.
 5.1
 5.2
 5.3
 5.4
 -12-




---



##### 



5.5
 5.6
 5.7
 6. Counterparts.
 7. Effectiveness
 [Signature page follows.]
 -4
 -13-




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof,
 BANK
    
    
    
    BORROWERSILICON VALLEY BANK
    
    
    
    I-FLOW CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Robert Anderson
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James R. TalevichName: Robert Anderson 
Title:   Senior Relationship Manager
    
    
    
    
    
    Name: James R. Talevich
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
 [Signature Page Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement]
 -14-
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 10, 2008
 TRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATION
  California
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    333-126538
(Commission File Number)
    
    33-0356705
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 7711 Center Avenue, Suite 100

Huntington Beach, California 92647
 (714) 373-8300
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.SIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01
    
    Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  TRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATION/s/ Timothy M. OConnorDate: January 11, 2008
    Name:
    Timothy M. OConnorTitle:
    Senior Vice President
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Furnished Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 3 to the Quarterly Report of Verdisys, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John OKeefe, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ John OKeefe
|----------------
|                
|Name:           
|Title:          
|Date:           

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Verdisys, Inc. and will be retained by Verdisys, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---