alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of AirNet Systems,
Inc. of our report dated February 18, 2000 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of AirNet Systems, Inc. included herein.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of AirNet Systems,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a)(2) and 14(d). This schedule is the responsibility of
the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-08189 and No. 333-62659) pertaining to the AirNet Systems,
Inc. Amended and Restated 1996 Incentive Stock Plan and the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-43605) pertaining to the AirNet Systems, Inc.
Retirement Savings Plan of our report dated February 18, 2000, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of AirNet Systems, Inc. included herein,
and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of AirNet Systems,
Inc.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Columbus, Ohio
March 27, 2000


                                       1
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5439-5440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01633]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 1

[WC Docket No. 17-84; Report No. 3209; FR ID 198691]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petition for Reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Petition for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in 
the Commission's proceeding Aryeh B. Fishman, on behalf of Edison 
Electric Institute.

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions must be filed on or before February 
13, 2024. Replies to oppositions must be filed on or before February 8, 
2024.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information on this 
proceeding, contact Michael Ray of the Wireline Competition Bureau, 
Competition Policy Division, at (202) 418-0357 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#abe6c2c8c3cacec785f9cad2ebcdc8c885ccc4dd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d994b0bab1b8bcb5f78bb8a099bfbabaf7beb6af">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document, Report No. 3209, released January 22, 2024. The full text of 
the Petitions can be accessed online via the Commission's Electronic 
Comment Filing System at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission 
will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress 
or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 
801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
    Subject: Accelerating Wireline Broadband Deployment by Removing

[[Page 5440]]

Barriers to Infrastructure Investment (WC Docket No. 17-84).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-01633 Filed 1-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Compute forecast trajectories

Compute archive trajectories

Retrieve previous model results

Restart user session (clear user inputs)

Current pre-computed U.S. trajectory forecasts

Trajectory optimization for balloon flights

Return to main HYSPLIT page

Modified: August 13, 2014

US Dept. of Commerce | NOAA | NOAA Research | ARL

Privacy | Disclaimer | Information Quality

Accessibility | webmaster

HYSPLIT Trajectory Model

Daily Limits

Users are limited to 500 trajectories per day in order to share the resources available with all HYSPLIT users.

Publishing HYSPLIT results

Publications using HYSPLIT results, maps or other READY products provided by NOAA ARL are requested to include an acknowledgement of, and citation to, the

NOAA Air Resources Laboratory. Appropriate versions of the following are recommended:

Citation

Draxler, R.R. and Rolph, G.D. HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website (http://www.arl.noaa.gov

/HYSPLIT.php). NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD.

Rolph, G.D. Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem (READY) Website (http://www.ready.noaa.gov). NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD.

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and dispersion model and/or READY website

(http://www.ready.noaa.gov) used in this publication.

Redistribution Permission

Permission to publish or redistribute HYSPLIT model results using forecast meteorological data from NOAA ARL can be obtained by providing relevant information

(reason, to whom, from whom) via email to arl.webmaster@noaa.gov. For further information, see the HYSPLIT Use Agreement.

READY - http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT_traj.php

1 of 1 9/17/2015 8:56 AM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 29, 2020

b0921

Order 

Clerk

September 29, 2020

160321

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160321

COA: 349682

Berrien CC: 2018-016201-FC

ALAN MICHAEL ROSETTO,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2019 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of People 

v Betts (Docket No. 148981) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision 

in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we 

ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marcus Tyrone WILLIAMSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7640.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 12, 2003.

Marcus Tyrone Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Blue Boggs, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Marcus Tyrone Williamson seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Williamson’s motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and the district court that Williamson has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Williamson,*Nos. CR-00-288-1; CA-02-81-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned
President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                   |  |                         |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2009 |  | /s/ JAMES J. BAUMBERGER
|                   |  | Name:                   |  | James J. Baumberger                  
|                   |  | Title:                  |  | President and chief executive officer
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

lfyou make changes to !he values inlhe table bdow. you must ensure the totals update according~v. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) imo and then ow <~{the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection 27.7 419 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $986,536 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

We have received 

no definitive data 

that would enable 

us to provide cost 

estimates for the 

on-condition 

actions specified in 

this proposed AD. 

7 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisjield can also be used to explain warranry costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? 0 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 0 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. -

YES 0 NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements tor 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftranspmtation? 0 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

8
# Eiropas Savienības L 30/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0715 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | L 30 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Tiesību akti | 63. gadagājums2020. gada 3. februāris |

ISSN 1977-0715

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

L 30

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Tiesību akti

63. gadagājums2020. gada 3. februāris

---

| Saturs | | Labojumi | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Padomes Lēmumā (ES) 2019/1815 (2019. gada 24. oktobris), ar ko ieceļ divus Reģionu komitejas locekļus un trīs locekļu aizstājējus, ko izvirzījusi Slovēnijas Republika ( OV L 278, 30.10.2019. ) | 1 |

Saturs

Labojumi

Lappuse

*

Padomes Lēmumā (ES) 2019/1815 (2019. gada 24. oktobris), ar ko ieceļ divus Reģionu komitejas locekļus un trīs locekļu aizstājējus, ko izvirzījusi Slovēnijas Republika ( OV L 278, 30.10.2019. )

( OV L 278, 30.10.2019. )

1

| LV | Tiesību akti, kuru virsraksti ir gaišajā drukā, attiecas uz kārtējiem jautājumiem lauksaimniecības jomā un parasti ir spēkā tikai ierobežotu laika posmu.
  Visu citu tiesību aktu virsraksti ir tumšajā drukā, un pirms tiem ir zvaigznīte. |
| --- | --- |

LV

Tiesību akti, kuru virsraksti ir gaišajā drukā, attiecas uz kārtējiem jautājumiem lauksaimniecības jomā un parasti ir spēkā tikai ierobežotu laika posmu.

Visu citu tiesību aktu virsraksti ir tumšajā drukā, un pirms tiem ir zvaigznīte.

---

Labojumi

| 3.2.2020 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | L 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

L 30/1

---

Padomes Lēmumā (ES) 2019/1815 (2019. gada 24. oktobris), ar ko ieceļ divus Reģionu komitejas locekļus un trīs locekļu aizstājējus, ko izvirzījusi Slovēnijas Republika

(
  “Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” L 278, 2019. gada 30. oktobris
  )

12. lappusē 1. panta b) punkta pirmajā ievilkumā:

tekstu:

| “— | Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ kungs, župan Mestne občine Maribor,” |
| --- | --- |

“—

Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ kungs, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”

Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ

župan Mestne občine Maribor

lasīt šādi:

| “— | Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ kungs, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”. |
| --- | --- |

“—

Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ kungs, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”.

Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ

župan Mestne občine Maribor

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-30002

TAYLOR CARLISLE, individually and as Representative Member of a Class; 

EMILE HERON, individually and as Representative Member of a Class, 

 Plaintiffs - Appellants

v.

TRACY MUSSAL, as Program Supervisor of the 24th Judicial District Court 

Drug Court Intensive Probation Program; KEVIN THERIOT, Probation 

Coordinator of the 24th Judicial District Court Drug Court Intensive 

Probation Program; KRISTEN BECNEL, as Administrator of the 24th 

Judicial District Court Drug Court Intensive Probation Program, 

 Defendants - Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:16-CV-3767

Before HAYNES, GRAVES, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellants, two former participants in Jefferson Parish’s Drug 

Court, brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They alleged 

members of the Drug Court, acting in their official and individual capacities, 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 14, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-30002 Document: 00515076271 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2019
No. 18-30002

2

violated their constitutional rights to due process by jailing them for technical 

program violations without a hearing and for giving them “flat time” sentences 

that did not allow the ability to earn credit for good behavior. The district court 

dismissed the claims against three Defendants, a Drug Court administrator, a 

Drug Court supervisor, and Drug Court probation officer, and entered a final 

judgment in their favor. 

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the applicable law, and the 

relevant portions of the record. We AFFIRM the judgment of the district court 

for the reasons explained in the district court’s orders dated May 23, 2017, 

August 1, 2017, October 31, 2017, and December 19, 2017.

 Case: 18-30002 Document: 00515076271 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2019
Exhibit 4.2
  WARRANT
to purchase
7,846,852
 Shares of Common Stock
 of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
  Definitions
 Affiliate
 Appraisal Procedure
 Board of Directors




---



##### 



Business Combination
 business day
 Capital Stock
  Charter
 Common Stock
 Common Stock Issuance
 Company Schedule A
 convertible securities
 Exchange Act
 Exercise Price Schedule A
 Expiration Time
 Fair Market Value
 Initial Number
 -2-




---



##### 



Investment Agreements
 Issue Date Schedule A
 Market Price
 Ordinary Cash Dividends provided Schedule A
 Permitted Transactions
 Person
 Per Share Fair Market Value
 Pro Rata Repurchases
 -3-




---



##### 



Effective Date
 Regulatory Approvals
 Sale Event
        -4-




---



##### 



SEC
 Securities Act
 Shares
 trading day
 U.S. GAAP
 VWAP
 Warrant
 Warrantholder
 Written Agreement
 Number of Shares; Exercise Price Warrantholder Schedule A Shares
 Exercise of Warrant; Term
 -5-




---



##### 



Expiration Time
 Federal Reserve BFI Written Agreement Event
 Schedule A
    -6-




---



##### 



Issuance of Shares; Authorization; Listing
 No Fractional Shares or Scrip
 No Rights as Stockholders; Transfer Books
 Charges, Taxes and Expenses
 -7-




---



##### 



Transfer/Assignment
    Exchange and Registry of Warrant
 Loss, Theft, Destruction or Mutilation of Warrant
 Saturdays, Sundays, Holidays, etc.
 Rule 144 Information
 -8-




---



##### 



Adjustments and Other Rights provided
 Stock Splits, Subdivisions, Reclassifications or Combinations
 Certain Issuances of Common Shares or Convertible Securities convertible
securities Common Stock Issuance
 -9-




---



##### 



Initial Number
 Permitted Transactions
 Other Distributions Per Share Fair Market Value
 -10-




---



##### 



Certain Repurchases of Common Stock
 Business Combinations
 -11-




---



##### 



Rounding of Calculations; Minimum Adjustments
 Timing of Issuance of Additional Common Stock upon Certain Adjustments provided however
 Other Events
 Statement Regarding Adjustments
 -12-




---



##### 



Notice of Adjustment Event
 Proceedings Prior to Any Action Requiring Adjustment
 Adjustment Rules
 Other Transactions
 Exchange
  -13-




---



##### 



No Impairment
 Governing Law, etc.
 Binding Effect
 Amendments
 Prohibited Actions
 Notices Schedule
A
 Entire Agreement Schedule A
 -14-




---



##### 



[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
 -15-




---



##### 



COMPANY:Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.By:Name:Title:Attest:By:Name:Title: [Signature Page to Warrant]




---



##### 



ANNEX A
  
 TO:
    
    Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
 RE:
    
    Election to Purchase Common Stock
   
 
 Holder:By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A
 Item 1
  
 Item 2
  Item 3
  Item 4
  Item 5
  Item 6
 Companys address:
    
    Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
999 Waterside Dr., Suite 200
Norfolk, VA 23510
 Item 7
 Notice information:
    
    Douglas J. Glenn
EVP and General Counsel
Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
999 Waterside Drive, Suite 200
Norfolk, Virginia 23510
Phone: (757) 217-1000
Fax: (757) 217-3656
**Exhibit****31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuantto Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Harry Brill,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Gladstone Capital Corporation;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed inthis report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data; and

 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: May 9, 2005

 
| /s/ HARRY BRILL                        |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Harry Brill                            |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1



Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Novoste Corporation (the
Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on this date hereof;



a. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



b. information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                     |  |                                                                
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2005 |  | /S/    ALFRED J.
NOVAKAlfred J.
Novak Chief Executive Officer  
|                     | 
|Date: March 16, 2005 |  | /S/    SUBHASH C.
SARDASubhash C.
Sarda Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Form 10-K and shall not be deemed to be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-K.