alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
G. Filer II, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ William G. Filer II
----------------------------------------------
William G. Filer II
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 11, 2004

                                      -25-
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 2, 2017



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Nicole Schaltenbrand             
|Nicole Schaltenbrand                 
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
### Bird, Patrick From: Crawford , Jeff S <Jeff.S .Crawford@maine .gov> Monday , June 20 , 2016 11 :05 AM Sent: 

### To: Bird , Patrick 

### Cc: McDonne ll, Ida Subject: RE : Ma i ne PSD SIP - C larifications Pat: You are correct on both counts: 1) December 12, 2012 is the correct date for determining permitting requirements for condensab le particulate matter; and 2) the Department is submitting only its recent most recent amendments to Chapter 100 (namely: amendments to the definition of " amb i ent increment " at Chapter 1 00 .11; amendments to a portion of the definition of " regulated pollutant" at Chapter 100.149(1); and amendments to the definition of " significant emissions increase " at Chapter 100.156) for i nclusion in the SIP . Jeff 

### From: Bird, Patrick [mailto:Bird.Patrick@epa.gov] 

### Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 11:30 AM 

### To: Crawford, Jeff S Subject: Maine PSD SIP - Clarifications Hi Jeff, As I move to finalize the Maine SIP subm ittals concerning the State ' s PSD permitting program , I would l ike clarificat ion on two points : 

### 1. The definitions of PM2 .5 and PM10 contain reference to an unspecified date which impacts permitting requirements for condensable part iculate matter. Based on conversations with you and your staff, we are under the impression t he date referenced in these definitions is December 1, 2012 . Th is date corresponds with the effective date of the regulation which most recent ly amended these defin itions . We are looking for confirmat ion on this interpretation. 2 . The May 31, 2016 letter from Marc Cone , Directo r of the Bureau of Air Quality at Maine DEP to David Conroy, Ch ief of the Ai r Programs Branch at EPA Region 1 seeks approval and incl u sion into the Maine SIP of recent amendments to Maine's Chapter 100 Defin it ion Regulation. Maine' s most recent rulemak i ng on Chapter 100 cons isted of amendments to the defin it ion of " amb ien t increment" at Chapter 100 . 11; amendments to a port i on of the definition of " regulated pollutant" at Chapter 100 . 149(1); and amendments to the definition of " significant emissions increase " at Chapter 100 . 156. Based on Maine' s May 31 , 2016 letter, we intend to limit approval to these specific provisions. We are seeking confi rmat ion that Maine's most recent Chapter 100 rulemaking only amended those definitions . If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly . Thank you , Pat Patrick Bird U.S . EPA - Reg io n 1 15 Post Office Square , OEPOS-2 Boston , MA 02109-3912 Phone : 617-918-1287 Fax: 617-918-0287 Email : bird .pat rick@epa.gov

2
**Exhibit 10.1**

** **

**ADDENDUM TO PROMISSORY NOTE**

 

of April 1, 2005Las Vegas, Nevada

 

As a provision of this Note,it is the expressed intent of the Holder to provide sufficient funds to MediCorLtd. to pay for shortfalls in cash caused by the operating activities ofMediCor Ltd. This commitment to fund operating shortfalls extends to April 1,2006, at which time the Holder and MediCor Ltd. shall have the option ofrenegotiating, terminating, or extending the terms and conditions of this Note.

 
|   | MediCor Ltd.,          |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | a Delaware corporation |
|   |                   |   |
|   | By:                    | /s/  THEODORE R.  MALONEY |   |
|   |                   | Theodore R. Maloney |
|   | Its:                   | President and CEO |
|   | Date:                  | April 1, 2005 |
|   |                   |   |
|   | By:                    | /s/  DONALD K.  MCGHAN |   |
|   |                   | Donald K. McGhan |
|   | Its:                   | Managing Member |
|   | Date:                  | April 1, 2005 |
|        |                        |  |  |  |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 8, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00086

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Y.G.B., A CHILD,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Tex as

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00166

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on May 8, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1835

To expand the definition of limited tax benefit for purposes of the Line

Item Veto Act.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 4, 1996

Mr. FEINGOLD (for himself, Mr. BRADLEY, and Mr. WELLSTONE) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to

the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one Committee reports, the

other Committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

A BILL

To expand the definition of limited tax benefit for purposes

of the Line Item Veto Act.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET

4 ACT.

5 Section 1026(9) of the Congressional Budget and Im6 poundment Control Act of 1974 (as added by the Line

7 Item Veto Act) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(9) LIMITED TAX BENEFIT.—The term ‘lim9 ited tax benefit’ means any tax provision that has
2

•S 1835 RIS

1 the practical effect of providing a benefit in the form

2 of different treatment to a particular taxpayer or a

3 limited class of taxpayers, whether or not such provi4 sion is limited by its terms to a particular taxpayer

5 or class of taxpayers.’’.

Æ
Alex Nikle

408 Roberts Street Apt.414 Fargo, ND 58102 CFR Title 14: Aeronautics and Space Part 61

- Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground Instructors Subpart G

- Airline Transport Pilots 61.165

- Additional Aircraft Category and Class Ratings (f)

- Adding a multiengine class rating or airplane type rating to an airline transport pilot certificate with a single engine class rating (2)

- After July 31, 2014, pass a required knowledge test on the aeronautical knowledge areas of 61.155(c), as applicable to multiengine airplanes The Airline Transport Pilot Certification Training Program is designed to prepare a commercial pilot certificate holder for the operations conducted within the air carrier environment. The ATP CTP is a prerequisite for the multiengine ATP certificate which includes training in: aerodynamics, automation, adverse weather, air carrier operations, transport category aircraft performance, professionalism, and leadership as stated by Advisory Circular 61

- 138. This program ultimately provides the necessary training in order to ensure the safe operation of all pilots entering the air carrier environment. In order to take the kn owledge test required by 61.165 (f)(2), one must complete an FAA approved ATP CTP course. I am wri ting this petition to obtain an exemption from the required ATP CTP course. I believe I should be exempt from this requirement because of my industry experience as a Pilot, First Officer for the regional air carrier, ExpressJet Airlines . While employed at ExpressJet, I completed the required ground school training and safely operated the Embraer E145 for the duration of my eleven month employment, obtaining approximately 350 hours of SIC flight time . Additionally, I was able to obtain experience in all aspe cts of air carrier operations that are now required by the new ATP Certification Training Program as li sted previously. I chose to depart the air carrier environment in order to pursue a corporate pilot position in the Midwest, where I was able to obtain a single engine Air Transport Pilot Certificate. This exemption would not adversely affect safety because of my previous experience as a Pilot, First Officer in the air carrier environment. I have already trained and experienced all aspects of air carrie r operations provided by the ATP CTP curriculum. This redundancy would not be necessary in order for me to be properly prepared to exercise the privileges of the multiengine ATP rating . I request to be exempt from the ATP CTP requirement and therefore I wo uld only need to complete the multiengine written exam and multiengine practical test in order to obtain the additional multiengine class add

-on to my single engine ATP certificate. Thank you.
NO. 07-09-0231-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 8, 2009

______________________________

CHRISTOPHER H. JUNCO D/B/A AAA MAXX A/C & HEATING, APPELLANT

V.

BEST PUBLICATIONS, LLP, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 58,793-A; HONORABLE HAL MINER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Christopher H. Junco d/b/a AAA Maxx A/C & Heating filed a notice of

appeal from a summary judgment order entered against him on May 4, 2009. The clerk’s

record was filed on September 3, 2009. No reporter’s record was made.

By letter of November 17, 2009, the Court reminded appellant that his brief was due

no later than Friday, November 6, and thus was past due. The letter notified appellant that

his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless his brief was filed, along

with a motion for extension of time, by Monday, November 30. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6.
2

An appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal for want of prosecution if an appellant

fails to timely file a brief unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the

appellee is not significantly injured by the failure. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). On its own

motion, with ten days' notice to the parties, an appellate court may dismiss a civil appeal

for want of prosecution or failure to comply with a notice from the clerk requiring a

response or other action within a specified time. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c). Here,

appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension by the date specified by the Court,

despite notice that his failure to do so would subject the appeal to dismissal. The Court has

given the parties the required ten days' notice.

Accordingly, we dismiss appellant’s appeal for want of prosecution and failure to

comply with a notice from the Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c). 

James T. Campbell

 Justice
exv10w91






Exhibit 10.91




RANK
GROUP LIMITED

LEVEL NINE

148 QUAY STREET

PO BOX 3515

AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND



October 15,
2009




Beverage Packaging Holdings (Luxembourg) III S.à r.l.

6C, PARC D’ACTIVITÉS SYRDALL

L-5365 MUNSBACH

GRAND DUCHY OF LUXEMBOURG



Ladies and Gentlemen:




     Reference is made to the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”),
dated as of October 15, 2009, by and between Beverage Packaging Holdings (Luxembourg) III S.à r.l.,
a private limited liability company (société
à responsabilité limltée) duly formed under the laws
of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (“Buyer”) and Closure Systems International (NZ) Limited,
a New Zealand company (“Seller”) (as such agreement may be amended from time to time, the
“Purchase Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the
meaning ascribed to them in the Purchase Agreement.



     As an inducement for Buyer and Seller to enter into the Purchase Agreement, Rank Group Limited
(“Rank”), a New Zealand company and an affiliate of
Seller, hereby agrees to (i) enforce,
in its reasonable discretion, any and all indemnification claims Rank may have against Alcoa Inc.,
a Pennsylvania corporation (“Alcoa”), under that certain Acquisition Agreement (the
“Alcoa Acquisition Agreement”), dated as of December 21, 2007, between Alcoa and Rank, to
the extent such claims are in respect of any Loss (as such term is defined in the Alcoa Acquisition
Agreement), experienced by the Business, the Company or any Company
Subsidiary and (ii) shall
promptly pay over to the Company any amounts Rank or any of its Affiliates (other than the Company
or any Company Subsidiary) may receive from Alcoa pursuant to the Alcoa Acquisition Agreement in
respect of any such indemnification claim, net of any out of pocket costs and expenses associated
with asserting such claim.



     This letter shall terminate from and after the date on which all or portion of the equity
interests of Buyer or Rank or any parent entity of Buyer or Rank is issued to or sold, assigned or
otherwise transferred to any Person that is not controlled directly or indirectly by the Hart
Group.



     This letter will be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal law of the State
of New York. This letter may be executed in counterparts and by facsimile, each of which will be an
original and all of which together will be one and the same instrument.



[Remainder of the Page Intentionally Left Blank]






 









 







     Please evidence your agreement with the foregoing by executing a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to us.






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,



RANK GROUP LIMITED

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Aller Philip Hugli
 	 
	 	 	Name: Aller Philip Hugli  	 
	 	 	Title:  	Authorized Signatory 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Acknowledged and agreed 

as of the date set forth above:





BEVERAGE PACKAGING HOLDINGS (LUXEMBOURG) III S.À R.L.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Helen Dorothy Golding
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Helen Dorothy Golding  	 
	 	 	Title:  	Authorized Signatory
EXHIBIT 23 PARITZ & COMPANY, P.A. 
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We have
issued our report dated March 23, 2009, accompanying the financial statements
of Trimol Group, Inc. to be contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
10-K) for Trimol Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, for its fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in
the 10-K and to the use of our name as it appears therein. /s/ Paritz
 & Company, P.A.PARITZ & COMPANY, P.A.Certified
 Public AccountantsDated: April
 15, 2009 - 38 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULE

237.3 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA 

RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 648

CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of October, 2016, upon the recommendation of the Civil 

Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been published for public comment at 

46 Pa.B. 982 (February 27, 2016):

IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of 

Pennsylvania that Rule 237.3 is amended in the attached form.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and 

shall be effective January 1, 2017.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and brackets.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1752

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt full-time registered nurses,

physician assistants, and expanded-function dental auxiliaries from restrictions on remunerated outside professional activities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 13, 1996

Mr. SIMPSON (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exempt fulltime registered nurses, physician assistants, and expanded-function dental auxiliaries from restrictions on

remunerated outside professional activities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That except as otherwise expressly provided, whenever in

4 this Act an amendment is expressed in terms of an amend5 ment to a section or other provision, the reference shall

6 be considered to be made to a section or other provision

7 of title 38, United States Code.

8 SEC. 2. Section 7423 is amended—
2

S 1752 IS

1 (1) in subsection (b) by striking paragraph (1)

2 and redesignating paragraphs (2), (3), (4), (5), and

3 (6) as paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), and (5);

4 (2) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), (e),

5 and (f) as subsections (d), (e), (f), and (g); and

6 (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the follow7 ing new subsection (c):

8 ‘‘(c) A physician, dentist, podiatrist, or optometrist

9 appointed as a full-time employee under this title (other

10 than an intern or resident appointed pursuant to section

11 7406 of this title) may not assume responsibility for the

12 medical care of any patient other than a patient admitted

13 for treatment at a Department facility, except in those

14 cases where the appointee, upon request and with the ap15 proval of the Under Secretary for Health, assumes such

16 responsibilities to assist communities or medical practice

17 groups to meet medical needs which would not otherwise

18 be met for a period not to exceed 180 calendar days, which

19 may be extended by the Under Secretary for Health for

20 additional periods not to exceed 180 calendar days each.’’.

Æ
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1465

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

DECEMBER 14, 1995

Referred to the Committee on International Relations

AN ACT

To extend au pair programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1465 RFH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AU PAIR PROGRAMS.

2 (a) REPEAL.—Section 8 of the Eisenhower Exchange

3 Fellowship Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–454) is repealed.

4 (b) AUTHORITY FOR AU PAIR PROGRAMS.—The Di5 rector of the United States Information Agency is author6 ized to continue to administer an au pair program, operat7 ing on a world-wide basis, through fiscal year 1997.

8 (c) REPORT.—Not later than October 1, 1996, the

9 Director of the United States Information Agency shall

10 submit a report regarding the continued extension of au

11 pair programs to the Committee on Foreign Relations of

12 the Senate and the Committee on International Relations

13 of the House of Representatives. This report shall specifi14 cally detail the compliance of all au pair organizations

15 with regulations governing au pair programs as published

16 on February 15, 1995.

Passed the Senate December 13, 1995.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
#### Robert MAHONY, as father and personal representative of Eve Mahony, in his own behalf and as next of kin and for the Use and Benefit of Eve Mahony’s mother, Barbara Mahony, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 90-9052.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

May 24, 1993.

Allison Ulin Lynch, Paty Rymer & Ulin, Pamela Rymer O’Dwyer, Chattanooga, TN, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jack Harrell Senterfitt, Alston & Bird, Gerald L. Mize, Jr., James W. Hagan, Atlanta, GA, for defendant-appellee.

Before TJOPLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and DYER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In this case, plaintiffs appeal an adverse judgment in their Georgia wrongful death action arising from a railroad crossing accident. A panel of this court, applying our decision in *Eastenvood v. CSX Transportation, Inc.,*933 F.2d 1548 (11th Cir.1991), remanded the case. 966 F.2d 644. A majority of the active judges in regular active service ordered that the appeal be reheard by the court of appeals en bane. This order vacated the panel opinion. *Mahony v. CSX Transp., Inc.,*980 F.2d 1379 (11th Cir.1992). Subsequently, the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed our decision in *Easterwood. See CSX Transp., Inc. v. Easterwood,*— U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1732, 123 L.Ed.2d 387 (1993).

We now reinstate the panel opinion in its entirety.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Order filed, January 29, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-01123-CR

____________

SHALAY MICHELLE RICHARDSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 263rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1337838

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 13, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jacqueline Fischer, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM