alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This Certification is intended to accompany the Quarterly Report of SVB
Financial Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. To the best of their knowledge, the undersigned, in their
respective capacities as set forth below, hereby certify that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.

/s/ Robert P. Corcoran
-------------------------------------------
Robert P. Corcoran, Chief Executive Officer          Date: March 18, 2004

/s/ Keith B. McCarthy
-------------------------------------------
Keith B. McCarthy, Chief Financial Officer           Date: March 18, 2004

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITH THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SVB FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY SVB FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

                                       16
---

EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Trimol Group Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/ Boris BirshteinBoris BirshteinChief Executive OfficerTRIMOL GROUP, INC.





April 5, 2010
### NUMBER 13 - 0 9 - 00 410 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN THE MATTER OF DOLORES ORTIZ AGUILAR AND JOSE LUIS AGUILAR AND IN THE INTEREST OF J.L.A., JR. AND A.A.A., CHILDREN

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 3 43 rd District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Jose Luis Aguilar, pro se perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 3 43 rd District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B

- 08

- 1001

- CV

- C

. Appellant ha s filed a motion stating the trial court’s judgment constitutes no appealable
issues. A ppellant request s permission to withdraw his appeal. The Court construes appellant’s motion as a motion to dismiss the appeal

. The Court, having consider ed the documents on file and appellant’s motion to d ismiss the2

appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant = s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed ag ainst appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant = s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will
issue forthwith. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 27th day of May , 2010

.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

The Honorable Otis D. Wright, II, United States District Judge for the ***

Central District of California, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ELVERIA RODRIGUEZ-QUIROS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10482

D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00256-RLHPAL-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Roger L. Hunt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

San Francisco, California

Before: SILVERMAN and GRABER, Circuit Judges, and WRIGHT, District

Judge.*** 

FILED

JUL 14 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Defendant Elveria Rodriguez-Quiros appeals the district court’s denial of her

motion to suppress the drugs found in her car’s bumper. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

The record does not support the defendant’s claim that the district judge

improperly rejected the magistrate judge’s factual findings. The district judge 

adopted the magistrate judge’s findings, but reached a different legal conclusion

regarding probable cause.

Having obtained the defendant’s lawful consent to search the vehicle, the

troopers were within their rights to inspect and probe a pre-existing hole in the

bumper. Upon discovering white powder and observing what looked like tape, the

troopers had probable cause to believe that the normally empty bumper contained

drugs. See United States v. Ewing, 638 F.3d 1226, 1231 (9th Cir. 2011).

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-32853, 33-15027, 33-34300, 33-45709, 33-45272, 33-15008, 33-56514,
33-64834, 33-64836, 33-83026 and 33-61983) on Form S-8 of Fidelity National
Financial, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 1996, relating to the
Consolidated Balance Sheets of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the related Consolidated
Statements of Earnings, Stockholders' Equity and Cash Flows and related
schedules for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995
which report appears in the December 31, 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
 
                                          KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Orange County, California
March 20, 1996
### In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

____________________ No. 19

- 2121 P

AMELA E. V EAL

- H ILL , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. C OMMISSIONER OF I NTERNAL R EVENUE , Respondent

- Appellee

.

____________________ Appeal from the United States Tax Court No. 1517

- 17

— Richard T. Morrison , Judge

.

____________________ D ECIDED O CTOBER 14 , 2020

____________________ Before S YKES , Chief Judge , and E ASTERBROOK and K ANNE , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM

. This court is no stranger to frivolous tax appeals

. In 1986 we set $1 , 500 as the presumptive sanction for a frivolous tax appeal

. Coleman v. Comm'r , 791 F.2d 68, 73 (7th Cir. 1986)

. Coleman involved groundless claims by two tax protestors ; we established the $1 , 500 penalty as an approximation of the cost of the government attorneys’ wasted time in lieu of inviting proof of actual attorneys’ fees. Id

. Ten years later inflation prompted us to raise that sanc-2 No. 19

- 2121
tion to $2 , 000. Cohn v. Comm'r , 101 F.3d 486, 487 ( 7th Cir. 1996). Another decade passed , and we adjusted the sanction for a frivolous tax appeal to $4 , 000 , this time to reflect both further inflation and additional data on the actual expenses the government incurred litigating a frivolous appeal

. Szopa v. United States , 460 F.3d 884, 887 (7th Cir. 2006). Since then we have left the sanction at $4 , 000. But a s we observed in Cohn , any rule stated in a fixed dollar amount must be a djusted from time to time. 101 F.3d at 487; see also United States v. Boliaux , 915 F.3d 493, 497 (7th Cir. 2019)

. T he time has come yet again. The Consumer Price Index has increased roughly 25 % since we decided Szopa , so t he price of a frivolous tax appeal should rise in tow . We therefore impose a $5 , 000 sanction for this frivolous tax appeal to be paid in accordance with, and for the reasons stated in, the accompanying order.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
O. Hatler, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Gerald O. Hatler
--------------------
Gerald O. Hatler
President and Chief Executive Officer

May 12, 2006
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1624

To reauthorize the Hate Crime Statistics Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 19, 1996

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. SIMON, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. KOHL, Mr. DEWINE, Mrs.

FEINSTEIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. JOHNSTON, Mr. D’AMATO, Mr.

AKAKA, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. CAMPBELL,

Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. COHEN, Mr. DODD, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mrs.

KASSEBAUM, Mr. KERRY, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mrs. MURRAY,

Mr. PELL, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. WELLSTONE, Mr. HARKIN, Mr. WYDEN,

and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To reauthorize the Hate Crime Statistics Act, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION.

4 The first section of the Hate Crime Statistics Act (28

5 U.S.C. 534 note) is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘for the cal7 endar year 1990 and each of the succeeding 4 cal-
2

•S 1624 IS

1 endar years’’ and inserting ‘‘for each calendar year’’;

2 and

3 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘through fiscal

4 year 1994’’.

Æ
**Exhibit10.4**

 

**EMPLOYMENTAGREEMENT STOCK OPTION**

 

This Employment AgreementStock Option (Stock Option #EO28), dated as of September 2, 2003, is by and between **MEDICOR LTD.AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES** (collectively, the “Corporation”), and **THEODORE R. MALONEY** (the “Employee”).

 

Effective as ofSeptember 2, 2003, the Employee will receive an Employment Option (the“Option”) of **TWO HUNDRED****THOUSAND(200,000)** shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock, at a compositeprice of **ONE DOLLAR AND FIFTY****CENTS($1.50)** per share to be vested as follows: **25% PER YEAR FOR EACH FULL YEAR OFEMPLOYMENT FROM THE EMPLOYMENT DATE.**

 

The Option will expire seven (7) years from theEmployment Date identified in  theEmployment Agreement, or upon termination of employment (as herein provided),whichever first occurs.  The Option isnot a part of the Corporation’s Stock Compensation Plan (if any), is nottransferable and may be exercised only by the Employee, the Employee’s executoror spouse.  Continued employment withthe Corporation is a condition of the vesting of the Options.  The Option may be exercised within six (6)months of the termination of employment of the Employee, unless the Employee’semployment is terminated “For Cause” as provided in Section 5 of theEmployment Agreement, in which case the un-vested portion of the Optionterminates at the date of termination of the Employee.  The Employee will execute such otherdocuments and make such representations as may be required for securities orother regulatory compliance.

 

The number of shares andthe option price subject to the Option shall be adjusted for any stockdividend, split-up, combination or exchange of shares, or any other similarchange.

 

In the event of a Changeof Control in ownership of the Corporation (defined for the purpose of thisAgreement as the purchase of more than fifty percent (50%) of the Corporation’soutstanding shares by a shareholder who, at the date of this Agreement is not ashareholder of the Corporation), all shares of the Option shall vest and be availablefor purchase within thirty (30) days of notification by the Corporation to theEmployee of the Change of Control.

 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties hereto have executed thisEmployment Agreement Stock Option to be effective as of the 2nd dayof September 2003.

 
|   | **CORPORATION:**        |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | **MEDICOR LTD.**        |
|   |                    |
|   | By:                     | /s/ Donald K. McGhan |   |
|   |                    | Donald K. McGhan |
|   | Title:                  | Chairman of the Board |
|   |                    |
|   | **EMPLOYEE:**           |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ Theodore R. Maloney |   |
|   | Theodore R.  Maloney    |   |
|        |                         |  |  |  |

 

1

----
Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officerof McKenzie Bay International, Ltd.  (the "Company"),  hereby certify, based on  my  knowledge,  that  the Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-QSB of the Company  for  the  quarter ended  March 31, 2006  (the "Report") fully complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934   and  that  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 18, 2006

/s/ Gregory N. Bakeman

----------------------

Gregory N. Bakeman

Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1931

To provide that the United States Post Office building that is to be located

at 9 East Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘L. Clure Morton Post Office and Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 8, 1996

Mr. THOMPSON (for himself and Mr. FRIST) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To provide that the United States Post Office building that

is to be located at 9 East Broad Street, Cookeville,

Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘L.

Clure Morton Post Office and Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF L. CLURE MORTON POST

4 OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE.

5 The United States Post Office building that is to be

6 located at 9 East Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee,

7 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘L. Clure Morton

8 Post Office and Courthouse’’.
2

•S 1931 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States Post Office building referred to in section 1 shall

5 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘L. Clure Morton Post

6 Office and Courthouse’’.

Æ
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Lawrence J. Finn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Terax Energy, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: February 20, 2007

/s/ Lawrence J. Finn
Lawrence J. Finn
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
  and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

---
Exhibit 32






AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION






Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002






Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the "Form 10Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.






Dated: Aug 20, 2012




By: /s/ Atsushi Maki


Atsushi Maki




Chairman & Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer
EPA REG FILE No. 61282-55

Vol 3 
1
2

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
3

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
4
5
6
EPA REGISTRTION FILE #61282-55 VOL 3

Page is not included in this copy. 

Pages 7 through 14 are not included in this copy. 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_ __ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities. 

 Description of the product manufacturing process. 

_____ Description of quality control procedures. 

Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

X__The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

 FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______. 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

Internal deliberative information. 

_____ Attorney-Client work product. 

 Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the

 Agency.

_____ Personal Privacy Information

The information not included is generally considered confidential 

by product registrants. If you have any questions, please contact 

the individual who prepared the response to your request. 

_________________________________________________________________
Exhibit 11
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                         Year ended December 31
                                                                     1996                     1995
                                                            -------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                           <C>                     <C>          
Weighted average shares outstanding during the period                 3,565                   2,446
Average number of shares assumed outstanding during the
   period approximating the number of shares sold (at
   the initial offering price of $10) to fund the final
   S Corporation distribution                                           111                     270
Total                                                                 3,676                   2,716
                                                            =================================================
Net income used in earnings per common share calculation
                                                              $       1,387           $       1,138
                                                            =================================================
Earnings per common share                                     $         .38           $         .42
                                                            =================================================

</TABLE>