alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1863/2006

of 15 December 2006         

fixing the minimum selling prices for butter for the 22nd individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 22nd individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005 the minimum selling prices for butter from intervention stocks and the amount of the processing security, as referred to in Articles 25 and 28 of that Regulation respectively, are fixed as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 16 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 308, 25.11.2005, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2107/2005 (OJ L 337, 22.12.2005, p. 20).

----

ANNEX

Minimum selling prices for butter and processing security for the 22nd individual invitation to tender under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Erik Damon BOYD, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-50290.

D.C. No. CR-99-01007-LGB-06.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.*

Decided Jan. 30, 2003.

Before HALL, KOZINSKI, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

I.

Under *United States v. Watts,*519 U.S. 148, 157, 117 S.Ct. 633, 136 L.Ed.2d 554 (1997), the district court was legally permitted to enhance Erik Damon Boyd’s sentence for using a weapon even though Boyd was acquitted by the jury of a similar firearm charge. The fact that Boyd received a higher sentence with the enhancement than he would have with a 924(c) conviction is irrelevant because Boyd is not entitled to a “net benefit” from *475his acquittal and Boyd’s total sentence was not higher than the statutory maximum allowed for the crimes of which he was convicted.

II.

There was clear and convincing evidence to support the gun enhancement and the district court so found. McCrary and Hill stated that all of the robbers, including Boyd, carried a gun. Although Brown did not state that everyone had a gun, he did testify that Boyd was present when Pace instructed everyone to make sure their guns were operable. The fact that the jury acquitted him of the firearm charge does not mean that the jury “rejected” testimony that Boyd carried a gun. *See Watts,*519 U.S. at 155, 117 S.Ct. 633.

III.

The victim’s testimony at trial and the medical records contained in the Presen-tence Report are sufficient to show by a preponderance of evidence that a victim sustained bodily injury under the Guidelines. The fact that the victim’s injury was not visible is immaterial and Boyd has presented no evidence that the victim’s injuries were fabricated.

The district court is AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit
        31
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I,
        Atsushi Maki, certify that:
 
 1.  
         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Amanasu
        Environment Corporation;
 
 2.  
         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
        of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
        circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect
        to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
        statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
        present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
        and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
        this
        quarterly report;
 
 4.  
         I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
        procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
        the
        registrant and we have:
 
 a)  
         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
        ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
        particularly during the period in which this report is being
        prepared;
 
 b)  
         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
        of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
        by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  
         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
        fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
        materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
        and
 
 5.  
         I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s
        auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons
        performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)  
         All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
        likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
        summarize and report financial data; and
 
 b)  
         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
        over
        financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
                  November 14, 2006/s/
                  Atsushi MakiAtsushi
                  MakiCEO,
                  CFO, CAO
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) January 14, 2009
 GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANY
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    1-8122
    
    94-1424307(State or other 
jurisdiction of 
formation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 1551 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 300, Santa Ana, California 92705   (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code (714) 667-8252
 Not Applicable   (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESExhibit IndexEX-99.1EX-99.2EX-99.3    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    The following are filed as Exhibits to this Current Report on Form 8-K:
 99.1
    
    Third Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property
and Escrow Instructions, dated as of January 14, 2009, by and between
GERA Danbury LLC and Matrix Connecticut, LLC.99.2
    
    Fourth Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property
and Escrow Instructions, dated as of January 16, 2009, by and between
GERA Danbury LLC and Matrix Connecticut, LLC.99.3
    
    Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property
and Escrow Instructions, dated as of January 20, 2009, by and between
GERA Danbury LLC and Matrix Connecticut, LLC.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  GRUBB & ELLIS COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Richard W. PehlkeRichard W. PehlkeChief Financial Officer and
Executive Vice President




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit no
    
    Description99.1
    
    Third Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property
and Escrow Instructions, dated as of January 14, 2009, by and between
GERA Danbury LLC and Matrix Connecticut, LLC.99.2
    
    Fourth Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property
and Escrow Instructions, dated as of January 16, 2009, by and between
GERA Danbury LLC and Matrix Connecticut, LLC.99.3
    
    Fifth Amendment to Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property
and Escrow Instructions, dated as of January 20, 2009, by and between
GERA Danbury LLC and Matrix Connecticut, LLC.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS24-03]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of special closed meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) met for a Special Closed Meeting on this date.

*Location:*                         Virtual meeting via Webex.                    

*Date:*                         January 17, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:45 a.m. ET.                    

## Action and Discussion Item

Personnel Matter

The ASC convened a Special Closed Meeting to discuss a personnel matter. No action was taken by the ASC.

James R. Park,

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 2024-01259 Filed 1-22-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2015 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 8, 2016



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Melissa Morrison                 
|Melissa Morrison                     
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      USC. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interstate Data USA, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Duane James, Vice President of Finance of the Company, hereby certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
                14, 2008
            
            /S/
                 Duane JamesDuane
                James
              Vice
                President of Finance
              (Principal
                Financial Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                 AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                  BIGMAR, INC.

     Bigmar, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue 
of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     1.  That the name of the corporation (hereinafter called the 
"Corporation") is Bigmar, Inc.

     2.  That the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the 
Corporation is hereby amended by striking out Article Fourth thereof and by 
substituting in lieu of said Article the following new Article:

     FOURTH: The total number of shares of all classes of stock to which the 
     Corporation shall have authority to issue is twenty-five million 
     (25,000,000) consisting of the following classes: (i) twenty million 
     (20,000,000) shares of common stock, par value $.001; (ii) five million 
     (5,000,000) shares of preferred stock, par value $.001.

     3.  That the amendment herein certified was duly adopted in accordance 
with the provisions of section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the 
State of Delaware.

     4.  That the effective time of the amendment herein certified shall be 
upon the filing date of this Certificate of Amendment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be 
executed by John G. Tramontana, its President and Chief Executive Officer, 
this 5th day of June, 1998.


                                       BIGMAR, INC.

                                       By:  /s/ JOHN G. TRAMONTANA
                                            --------------------------------
                                            John G. Tramontana
                                            President and CEO


ATTEST:

/s/ MICHAEL K. MEDORS
--------------------------------
Michael K. Medors
Secretary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE RELATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ON THE JOINT ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000930600
<NAME> SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,022,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,758,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                     119,762,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (15,461,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             113,347,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     20,783,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       109,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  79,685,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               113,347,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,548,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,350,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,029,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,169,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,169,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,169,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,169,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1647 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1647

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to provide 
that forest management activities shall be subject to initial judicial 
  review only in the United States district court for the district in 
      which the affected land is located, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 27 (legislative day, March 26), 1996

   Mr. Pressler (for himself, Mr. Craig, Mr. Lott, Mr. Bennett, Mr. 
   Simpson, Mr. Stevens, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Kyl, and Mr. 
   Thomas), introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to provide 
that forest management activities shall be subject to initial judicial 
  review only in the United States district court for the district in 
      which the affected land is located, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FOREST MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES.

    (a) In General.--Title VII of the Federal Land Policy and 
Management Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-579; 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) is 
amended--
            (1) in the title heading, by adding: ``; JUDICIAL REVIEW'' 
        at the end; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 708. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FOREST MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES.

    ``(a) Definition of Forest Management Activity.--In this section, 
the term `forest management activity' means a sale of timber, the 
issuance of a grazing permit or grazing lease, or any other activity 
authorized under a land use plan under this Act or a land or resource 
management plan under section 6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable 
Resources Planning Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604) to be carried out on 
Federal land.
    ``(b) Judicial Review.--A forest management activity and land use 
plan under this Act or a land or resource management plan under section 
6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 
(16 U.S.C. 1604) (including an amendment to or revision of a plan) 
shall be subject to initial judicial review only in the United States 
district court for the district in which the affected land is 
located.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents of the Federal 
Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. prec. 1701) is 
amended--
            (1) in the heading relating to title VII, by adding ``; 
        JUDICIAL REVIEW'' at the end; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 708. Judicial review of forest management activities.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
99.1





Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting of Wichita Falls, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: May 28, 2003 |  | /S/    DAVID S.
SMITH                                                                                              
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  | David S. Smith President and Treasurer (principal executive
officer and principal financial and accounting officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1793

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to provide that the requirements relating

to marking imported articles and containers apply to fresh cut flowers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 22, 1996

Mr. GREGG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to provide that the requirements relating to marking imported articles and containers apply to fresh cut flowers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARKING OF FRESH CUT FLOWERS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 304 of the Tariff Act of

5 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) is amended—

6 (1) by redesignating subsections (f), (g), (h),

7 and (i) as subsections (g), (h), (i), and (j), respec8 tively; and

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the follow10 ing new subsection:
2

•S 1793 IS

1 ‘‘(f) MARKING OF CUT FLOWERS.—Notwithstanding

2 any other provision of law, no exception may be made

3 under subsection (a)(3) with respect to fresh cut flowers

4 described in or classified under superior heading 0603, or

5 subheading 0603.10, 0603.10.30, 0603.10.60,

6 0603.10.70, or 0603.10.80 of the Harmonized Tariff

7 Schedule of the United States, as in effect on January

8 1, 1996. The Secretary of the Treasury shall, by regula9 tion, assure such fresh cut flowers are labeled, marked,

10 or otherwise clearly identified at the retail level as to their

11 country of origin.’’.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section applies to articles entered, or withdrawn from

14 warehouse for consumption, on the date that is 15 days

15 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ