# TEST REPORT

EMISSIONS TEST PROGRAM CLAY MACT ICR DATA GATHERING

KOHLER COMPANY VITREOUS PLANT KOHLER, WISCONSIN

PREPARED FOR:


# KOHLER COMPANY 444 Highland Drive Kohler, Wisconsin 53044 Phone: 920.457.4441 Ext. 77263 E-mail: michael.cassidy@kohler.com Attention: Mr. Michael 

# J. Cassidy EHS Specialist

ARI Project No. 899-02 ARI Test Protocol 899-01 ARI Proposal No. 25110 Revision 1 Kohler Purchase Order No. 1 003753680C Test Dates: August 3 through 6, 2010 

# --=-==== 

# = .-.---- _.-**-~-** 

# - - _ ..... 

# - _,...._ 

# ... __ .....__

"ff/'ENVIRONMENTAL

..... INC. 

# ARI Environmental, Inc. 951 Old Rand Road, Unit 106 Wauconda, Illinois 60084 Phone: 847.487.1580 Ext. 120 Fax: 847.487.1587 E-mail: dfitzgerald@arienv.com Daniel 

# E. Fitzgerald Division Manager Source Testing

### .iiiiiiiiiiiiii;;;;;. 

# .:::::::::::::::;=. 

# = Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: i of 

# iii __. 

# ___ _ ----..--- 

# --- 

# -

__ .,.,.-


# -------**~--** 

# ..._._ 'lfii""ENVIRONMENrAL

... INC. 

# TABLE IF CIIITEIITS

SECTIONS



# Section 1
Section 2

Section 3
Section 4
FIGURES 

# Figure 2-1 Figure 2-2 Figure 2-3 Figure 2-4
TABLES


# Table 1-1 Table 1-2 Table 1-3 Table 2-1 Table 4-1 Table 4-2 Table 4-3 Table 4-4 Table 4-5 Table 4-6 Table 4-7 Table 4-8 Table 4-9 Table 4-10 Table 4-11 Table 4-12 Table 4-13 899-02 

## PAGE

REPORT CERTIFICATION 

# iii
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY 

# 1-1
TESTING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 

# 2-1 2.1 Overview 2-1 2.2 Methodology 2-1 2.2.1 Sampling Locations (USEPA Method 1) 2-1 2.2.2 Flue Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (US EPA Method 2) 2-2 2.2.3 Stack Gas Molecular Weight (USEPA Method 3) 2-2 2.2.4 Flue Gas Moisture Content (USEPA Method 4) 2-2 2.2.5 Filterable Particulate Matter (USEPA Method 5) 2-2 2.2.6 Polychlorinated Dibenzo-P-Dioxins and Polychlorinated 2-5 Dibenzofurans (USEPA Method 23} 2.2. 7 Hydrochloric Acid and Hydrogen Fluoride Determination 2-10 (USEPA Method 26A) 2.2.8 Metals Determination (USEPA Method 29) 2-12
PROCESS DESCRIPTION 

# 3-1
TEST RESULTS 

# 4-1

USEPA Method 5 Filterable Particulate Matter Sampling Train USEPA Method 23 Sampling Train USEPA Method 26A Sampling Train USEPA Method 5/29 Sampling System

Summary of Tunnel Kiln #19 POC Stack Test Results Summary of Ware Dryer #1 Stack Test Results Summary of Spray Booth Exhaust Test Results USEPA Method 23 Spike Compounds and Quantity Spiked Tunnel Kiln #19- POC Stack D/F Test Results Tunnel Kiln #19- POC Stack D/F Emissions Summary (Run 1) Tunnel Kiln #19- POC Stack D/F Emissions Summary (Run 2) Tunnel Kiln #19- POC Stack D/F Emissions Summary (Run 3) Tunnel Kiln #19 POC Stack FPM and Metals Test Results Tunnel Kiln #19- POC Stack HCI and HF Test Results Tunnel Kiln #19- RCE Stack Volumetric Flow Test Results Tunnel Kiln #19- WEE Stack Volumetric Flow Test Results Ware Dryer #1 Stack D/F Test Results Ware Dryer #1 Stack D/F Emissions Summary (Run 1) Ware Dryer #1 Stack D/F Emissions Summary (Run 2) Ware Dryer #1 Stack D/F Emissions Summary (Run 3) Spray Booth Exhaust FPM Test Results 2-3 2-6 2-11 2-13

1-3 1-4 1-4 2-9 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-9 4-10 4-11 4-12 4-13 4-14 4-15 4-16

# --- -=== 

# .------ 

# ___ .,._,_



# --- 

# - 

# -

_._. 

# -

-**--~-** 

# ... 

# --

.._._ ,..ENVIRONMENTAL 

## "9"" INC. 

# TillE OF COIITEIITS

APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F

899-02 

# Calculation Summaries Field Data Analytical Data Process Data Calibration Data Test Program Qualifications Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: ii of iii



# ii

# ---- 

# - - 

# - 

# - ------ 

# -- ._,_- 

# -;:::;;- 

# - g;z 

# =
..... - 

# ----- .......... _ .,.ENVIRONMENTAL

.... INC. 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: iii of iii 

# REPORT CERTIFICATION

STATEMENT OF CONFORMANCE AND TEST REPORT CERTIFICATION

I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that this test program was conducted in a manner conforming to the criteria set forth in ASTM D 7036-04: Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies, and that project management and supervision of all project related activities were performed by qualified individuals as defined by this practice.

I further certify that this test report and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with the ARI Environmental, Inc. quality management system designed to ensure that qualified personnel gathered and evaluated the test information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who performed the sampling and analysis relating to this performance test, the information submitted in this test report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.

Danie

. F tzgerald, QSTI Division Manager, Source Testing ARI Environmental, Inc.

899-02 

# iii

# --


# -


# ------- ----..-- 

# --- 

# -

__ ._..- 

# -**--~-** 

# .. 

# -- --..- "'ff!"ENVIRO/IIMENTAL

... /NO. 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3

- 8/6/1 0 Page: 1 of 37 

# SECTIONONE Introduction and Summarv

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is developing a new air pollution control regulation, known as the Clay MACT rule, to reduce hazardous air pollutant {HAP} emissions from clay ceramics manufacturing operations, which include sanitaryware and tile. The US EPA distributes ICRs (Information Collection Requests), also known as Section 114 requests, to likely affected sources to obtain emissions and process specific information. Kohler Company's {Kohler) vitreous sanitaryware facilities received an ICR from the US EPA which requests stack testing on their sanitaryware kilns, dryers and glaze spray booths.
ARI Environmental, Inc. (ARI) was retained by Kohler to conduct the air emissions testing at their facility located in Kohler, Wisconsin.
The test program was conducted on August 3 through 6, 2010 on one tunnel kiln, one ware dryer and one spray booth in response to the US EPA Section 114 ICR Letter for informational requirements as follows:

Test Date
8/3 

# & 8/4/10

8/5 

# & 8/6/10 8/5/10 

## Source
1F Tunnel Kiln (TK-19)

Ware Dryer (WD-1) Spray Booth 

## (024) 

## Stack
POC

RCE

WEE



## WOE

SSE 

## Pollutants
Dioxins and Furans (0/F)
Filterable Particulate Matter (FPM) and Metals* Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) and Hydrochloric Acid (HCI) Oxygen 

## (0 2 ) 

## and acfm



# 0 2 

## and acfm

0/F

FPM



# Where: POC

- products of combustion stack RCE

- rapid cooling exhaust stack SBE- spray booth exhaust WOE ware dryer exhaust WEE

- ware exit exhaust stack
*The following metals were determined:

899-02 

# Antimony Arsenic Beryllium Cadmium Chromium Cobalt Lead Manganese Mercury Nickel Selenium Test Methods/Test Runs
USEPA Method 23: Three (3) 240-minute test runs USEPA Methods 5 and 29: Three (3) 240-minute test runs

USEPA Method 26A: Three (3) 60-minute test runs

USEPA Methods 2 and 3: One measurement to coincide with each 0/F test run USEPA Methods 2 and 3: One measurement to coincide with each 0/F test run USEPA Method 23: Three (3) 240-minute test runs USEPA Method 5: Three (3) 60-minute test runs



# 1-1

# --



# - .....,. 

# __ --

.... 

# - ---- 

# - 

# - 

# -

...... 

# - ---- 

# - ,...,._ ...-FAJIIIIUMJMFAJ'TA

..... INC. 

# SECTION ONE Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3

- 8/6/1 0 Page: 2 of 37 

# Introduction and Summarv

Where applicable, test procedures followed the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 60 (40 CFR 60), Appendix A, USEPA Methods 1-5, 23, 26A and 29; and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume Ill, Stationary Source Specific Methods.

Under the direct supervision of Mr. Dan Fitzgerald, ARI's test team consisted of Messrs. Jerry Bovee, Jeff Goldfine, Andrew Hornbeck, Ryan Lyons and Nathan Sekulic. Mr. Michael Cassidy of Kohler provided coordination of the test program with facility operations.

The results of the test program are summarized in Tables 1-1 through 1-3.

899-02 

# 1-2

# - - Kohler Company: Kohler, WI 

# - -- - 

# -- 

# - - 

# --- Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering 

# -- -**-~** 

# - --- 

# - Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 

# ........ E!NV/RONMENTAL

..... INC. 

# Page: 3 of37 

# SECTION ONE 

# Introduction and Summarv

TABLE 1-1. SUMMARY 

# OF TUNNEL KILN #19 POC STACK TEST RESULTS

COMPANY Kohler LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE Tunnel Kiln #19- POC


## USEPA Parameter Method Run 1 Run2 Run 3 Units
FPM 5 12.149 11.748 10.907 mg/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 FPM 5 0.03925 0.03966 0.03512 kg/hr 2,3,7,8-TCDD 23 0.07280 0.06224 0.06322 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Total TCDD 23 1.32881 1.44433 1.87411 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1 ,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 23 0.26294 0.24142 0.33310 ng/dscm @ 7% Oz Total PeCDD 23 2.66470 2.90960 3.80480 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1 ,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 23 0.16539 0.16118 0.12023 n9/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 23 0.33998 0.30352 0.33875 n9/dscm @ 7% Oz 1 ,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 23 0.55344 0.51842 0.53394 ng/dscm @ 7% Oz Total HxCDD 23 5.80296 5.31682 5.48796 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1 ,2,3,4,6, 7,8 HpCDD 23 3.42806 3.15381 3.52192 ng/dscm @ 7% Oz Total HpCDD 23 6.44616 5.96572 6.49221 n9/dscm @ 7% Oz 1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD (Total) 23 28.41400 26.09567 29.77362 n9/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 2,3,7,8-TCDF 23 < 0.02545 0.02658 0.02885 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Total TCDF 23 0.09966 0.09001 0.17680 ng/dscm @ 7% Oz 1 ,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 23 0.00990 0.00858 0.00983 n9/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 23 < 0.01555 0.01605 0.01612 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Total PeCDF 23 0.05817 0.08861 0.06096 n9/dscm @ 7% Oz 1 ,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 23 < 0.00212 0.00521 < 0.00580 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1 ,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 23 < 0.00431 < 0.00293 < 0.00530 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 23 < 0.00247 < 0.00181 < 0.00559 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 23 < 0.00113 <0.00119 < 0.00636 09/dscm @ 7% Oz Total HxCDF 23 0.00157 0.00998 0.03246 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 23 < 0.00424 0.00345 0.00550 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 23 < 0.00064 < 0.00126 < 0.00665 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Total HpCDF 23 < 0.00064 0.00705 0.00941 n9/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF (Total) 23 < 0.00580 0.00886 0.00721 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Total D/F 23 < 44.82246 < 41.93665 < 47.71955 ng/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 HCI 26A 1.60 1.39 1.56 ppmv db @ 7% 

## 02 HF 26A 47.29 50.18 47.27 ppmv db@ 7% 

## 02 Antimony (Sb) 29 < 0.200 < 0.374 3.425 119/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Arsenic (As) 29 10.114 18.587 23.138 119/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Beryllium (Be) 29 < 0.200 < 0.190 < 0.201 119/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Cadmium (Cd) 29 < 0.100 < 0.095 < 0.168 119/dscm @ 7% Oz Chromium (Cr) 29 8.777 11.469 18.898 119/dscm @ 7% Oz Cobalt (Co) 29 0.314 0.263 0.388 119/dscm @ 7% Oz Lead (Pb) 29 27.722 34.290 30.601 119/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Manganese (Mn) 29 0.558 0.988 0.945 119/dscm @ 7% Oz Mercury (Hg) 29 15.519 16.730 17.471 119/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 Nickel (Ni) 29 5.162 1.649 2.608 119/dscm @ 7% Oz Selenium (Se) 29 12.896 25.990 26.215 119/dscm @ 7% Oz

899-02 

# 1-3

# - Kohler Company: Kohler, WI 

# - -- - -- - - 

# --- Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering 

# -- - = = 

# ..... = 

# - 

# - --- 

# - Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 

# ... - = ._._ """'ENVIR'ONMENTAL

..... INC. 

# Page: 4 of 37 

# SECTION ONE 

# Introduction and Summarv

TABLE 1-2. SUMMARY OF WARE DRYER #1 STACK TEST 

# RESULTS

COMPANY Kohler LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE Ware Dryer #1
USEPA Parameter Method Run 1 Run2 Run 3 Units 2,3,7,8-TCDD 23 < 

### 0.00059 < 

### 0.00117 < 

### 0.00066 ng/dscm TotaiTCDD 23 < 

### 0.00059 < 

### 0.00061 < 

### 0.00066 ng/dscm 1 ,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 23 < 

### 0.00074 < 

### 0.00139 0.00173 ng/dscm Total PeCDD 23 0.00208 0.00407 0.00683 ng/dscm 1 ,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 23 < 

### 0.00083 < 

### 0.00046 0.00165 ngldscm 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 23 < 

### 0.00218 < 

### 0.00205 < 

### 0.00168 ng/dscm 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 23 < 

### 0.00237 < 

### 0.00236 0.00427 ng/dscm Total HxCDD 23 < 

### 0.00059 0.00577 0.01283 ng/dscm 1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 23 0.03296 0.01873 0.04552 ng/dscm Total HpCDD 23 0.06142 0.03459 0.08346 ng/dscm 1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD (Total) 23 0.32015 0.17321 0.51448 ng/dscm 2,3,7,8-TCDF 23 < 

### 0.00026 < 

### 0.00027 < 

### 0.00038 ng/dscm Total TCDF 23 < 

### 0.00026 < 

### 0.00027 < 

### 0.00038 ng/dscm 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 23 < 

### 0.00028 < 

### 0.00039

. < 

### 0.00047 ng/dscm 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 23 < 

### 0.00026 < 

### 0.00037 < 

### 0.00047 ng/dscm Total PeCDF 23 < 

### 0.00028 < 

### 0.00039 < 

### 0.00047 ng/dscm 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 23 < 

### 0.00020 < 

### 0.00015 0.00040 ng/dscm 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 23 < 

### 0.00019 < 

### 0.00013 < 

### 0.00020 ng/dscm 1 ,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 23 < 

### 0.00031 < 

### 0.00014 < 

### 0.00022 ng/dscm 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 23 < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00016 < 

### 0.00024 ng/dscm Total HxCDF 23 < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00016 0.00040 ng/dscm 1 ,2,3,4,6, 7,8 HpCDF 23 < 

### 0.00052 < 

### 0.00041 < 

### 0.00026 ng/dscm 1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 23 < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00021 < 

### 0.00026 ng/dscm Total HpCDF 23 < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00021 < 

### 0.00033 ng/dscm 1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF (Total) 23 < 

### 0.00031 < 

### 0.00032 < 

### 0.00052 ng/dscm Total D/F 23 < 

### 0.38613 < 

### 0.21960 < 

### 0.62036 ng/dscm



# TABLE 1-3. SUMMARY OF SPRAY BOOTH EXHAUST TEST 

# RESULTS

COMPANY Kohler LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE Spray Booth Exhaust 024
USEPA Parameter Method Run 1 Run2 Run3 Units
FPM 5 13.277 13.967 11.279 mg/dscm FPM 5 0.1899 0.1932 0.1625 kg/hr

899-02 

# 1-4

# --

.......... """"""'"===



# ------- 

# ----...-.- 

# - 

# - - 

# - INC. 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 5 of 37 

# SECTION TWO 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

2.1 OVERVIEW

For the measurements or samples collected at each stack, three (3) sampling runs were conducted pursuant to the sample times listed in Section 1. Where applicable, the following stack gas parameters were determined during each sampling run: Temperature- oF Velocity- fps Volume flow rate

- acfm, scfm, dscfh Moisture

- % by volume Carbon dioxide (C0 2 ), 

# oxygen 

# (Oz) and nitrogen 

# (Nz) (by difference)-% by volume FPM

Concentration: mg/dscm, mg/dscm@ 7% 0 2 

# Emission Rate: kg/hr, kg/Mg of product D/F

Concentration: ng/dscm, ng/dscm@ 7% 0 2 

# Emission Rate: kg/hr, kg/Mg of product HF, HCI

Concentration: ppmv db @ 7% 0 2 

# Emission Rate: kg/hr, kg/Mg of product Metals

Concentration: f.lg/dscm @ 7% 

# Oz Emission Rate: kg/hr, kg/Mg of product



# 2.2 METHODOLOGY

Where applicable, test procedures followed 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, USEPA Methods 1-5, 23, 26A and 29; and the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume 

# Ill, Stationary Source Specific Methods.



# 2.2.1 Sampling Locations (USEPA Method 1)

The sampling point locations that were used for the determination of gas velocity and volume flow rate were determined following the procedural requirements as detailed in USEPA Method 1. The sampling locations and number of velocity sampling points were as follows:

Port Location Port Location Duct Upstream from Downstream No. Sampling Sampling Diameter Disturbance from Disturbance of Points Total Location (inches} {diameters} {diameters} Ports per Port Points
Tunnel Kiln TK-19 POC 35.25 6.8 >2.0 2 12 24 Tunnel Kiln TK-19 RCE 23.25 -6.45 >2.0 2 8 16 Tunnel Kiln TK-19 WEE 26.75 -8.97 >2.0 2 8 16 Ware Dryer WD-1 WDE 23.75 1.9 >2.0 2 12 24 Spray Booth Q24 SBE 32.0 -4.84 >2.0 2 12 24

899-02 

# 2-1

# --

-------- == 

# ;; -=-= --- 

# ---**--~-** 

# ----- ... 

# --
.._._ 'lf/I"'ENVIRONMENTAL

..... INC. 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3-8/6/10 Page: 6 of37 

# SECTIONTWO 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

2.2.2 Flue Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (USEPA Method 2)

Gas velocity and volumetric flow rate were determined following USEPA Method 2. Velocity head measurements were performed using a TypeS pilot tube and Dwyer inclined 0.00-0.25- in. or 0 -10-in. water manometer or magnehelic gauge. Temperature measurements were conducted using a digital temperature meter and chromel-alumel thermocouple. In some cases, the measurable pressure differential was very low and an electronic sensing device was used to measure the differential. In these cases, an Alnor Model No. EBT-720 was used.



# 2.2.3 Stack Gas Molecular Weight (US EPA Method 3)

The stack gas molecular weight was determined following USEPA Method 3. Gas samples were collected in aluminized Mylar bags using ARI's integrated bag collection system and analyzed for C0 2 , 

# 0 2 

# and N 2 

# (by difference) using a Hays Orsat type analyzer following each sampling run.


# 2.2.4 Flue Gas 

# Moisture Content (USEPA Method 4)

The stack gas moisture content was determined following US EPA Method 4. This method was performed as part of the pollutant sampling trains. Moisture was collected in a series of chilled impingers containing methodology specific liquids and silica gel. A dry gas meter to determine the sample volume followed the impingers. The amount of volume gain in the water impingers and weight gain in the silica gel impinger were used to calculate the moisture content. The psychrometric equations in the method were used to calculate the moisture content in 

# % by volume.



# 2.2.5 Filterable Particulate Matter (USEPA Method 5)

FPM sampling was performed following the procedures as detailed in USEPA Method 5. 

# Sampling Apparatus

The particulate sampling train was a stand-alone train (see Figure 2-1) for the Glaze Spray Booths and combined with the US EPA Method 29 metals sampling train (see Figure 2-4) for the Tunnel Kiln. Assembled by ARI personnel, it consisted of the following:

• Nozzle- Borosilicate glass with sharp, tapered leading edge.

• Probe

- Stainless steel with a borosilicate glass liner and a heating system capable of maintaining a probe exit temperature of 248°F ±25°F.

• Pitot Tube- Type-S attached to probe for monitoring stack gas velocity.

• Filter Holder- Borosilicate glass with a Teflon frit filter support and a silicone rubber gasket. The holder design provides a positive seal against leakage from the outside or around the filter. The filter holder was heated to 248°F ±25°F.

899-02 

# 2-2coc.oc.oI0I'VNw"S"TypePitotTubeStackWall14HeatedArea-_____7.-_Filter1HolderIIII:rWh:...-111......---Thermocouple_(Thermocouple}Tb..tT:·{Manometer,,13-III_/ThermocoupleIII'-___'lmpingers1I---------- --Bath-/---JTemperatureIndicator02THERMOCOUPLE------PROBEin( >IPITOTTUBEIMPINGERCONTENTS1.100mldeionized/distilledwater2.100mldeionized/distilledwater3.Empty4.200gsilicagelDryTestMeterVacuumPumpFIGURE2-1.USEPAMETHOD5FILTERABLEPARTICULATEMATTERSAMPLINGTRAINse!3l11nil-tl=0...CDS4-·==•==..=0•Q)-'<::,;:ss::g.-·-1>(!)"(1)0'""1DJcn-10-.....00...,:::o-5-.a>omDenm::J...lJ.......'<••Q)Q)..="•ID:::r=...._,co:Tro..CDen......,o<O-

# ---- 

# -=-= =-==-=- 

# =

----- -;:::::;; 

# -- - g;: -

# -~ - 

# ----- .. 

# --
.._._

..... ENVJRONMENrAL

...... INC. 

# SECTIONTWO Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 8 of 37 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

• Draft Gauge- Inclined manometer with a readability of 0.01-in. H 2 

# 0 in the 0- to 10-in. range.

• lmpingers- Four (4) impingers connected in series with glass ball joints. The first, third and fourth were of the Greenburg-Smith design, but modified by replacing the standard tip with a %-in.-i.d. glass tube extending to within %-in. of the bottom of the impinger flask. The second impinger was of the Greenburg-Smith design with a standard tip.

• Metering System -Apex Model 522. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump, thermometers capable of measuring temperature to within 5°F, dry gas meter with ±2 percent accuracy, and related equipment as required to maintain an isokinetic sampling rate and to determine sample volume.

• Barometer- Mercury barometer capable of measuring atmospheric pressure to within ±0.1-in. Hg. 

# Sampling Procedures
After the minimum number of traverse points were selected, the stack pressure, temperature, moisture, and range of velocity head were measured according to procedures described in US EPA Methods 1 through 4. The first and second impingers initially contained 100 milliliters (mL) of deionized/distilled water. The third impinger was empty. The fourth impinger contained 200 g of silica gel. The train was set up with the probe and filter holder as shown in Figure 2-1.
The sampling train was leak-checked at the sampling site by plugging the inlet to the nozzle and pulling a vacuum of 15-in. Hg. Leak rates of less than 0.02 

# ft /min at a vacuum of 15-in. Hg were acceptable to commence sampling. At the completion of each test run, the sampling train was again leak-checked by the same procedure, but at the highest vacuum attained during the test run. Pre- and post-test leak checks of the pilot tube were made for each test run. Ice was used around the impingers to keep the temperature of the gases leaving the last impinger at less than 68°F. During sampling, stack gas and sampling train data were recorded at specified intervals. lsokinetic sampling rates were set throughout the sampling period with the aid of a programmable calculator. 

# Sample Recovery Procedures
After sampling was completed, the sampling train was then moved carefully from the test site to the recovery area. The sample fractions were recovered as follows:

899-02 

# Container 1

- The filter holder was carefully disassembled and the filter disc was removed and placed in a petri dish. Loose particulate and acetone rinse of the sample exposed surface prior to the filter were placed in Container 2 listed below.
Container 2- Loose particulate and acetone washings from all sample-exposed surfaces prior to the filter were placed in a glass bottle, sealed, and labeled. Particulate was removed from the probe with the aid of a brush and acetone rinsing. The liquid level was marked after the container was sealed. 2-4

# ----

----- =-==_::. 

# =



# ----- 

# --- 

# -- ---- 

# - 

# ----- .... 

# -- ,...,._ ..,ENVIRONMENTAL

...... INC. 

# SECTIONTWO Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 9 of 37 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

The contents of the first three impingers were measured either volumetrically or gravimetrically and recorded on the field data sheet. The contents were then discarded.

The silica gel from the fourth impinger was weighed, and this value was recorded on the field data sheet. An unused filter, acetone and distilled water were taken as blanks. Analytical Procedures

The analytical procedures followed those described in USEPA Method 5.
Container 1

- The filter and any loose particulate matter from this sample container were placed in a tared glass weighing dish, placed in a desiccator for 24 hours and weighed to a constant weight to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Container 2

- The acetone washings were transferred to a tared beaker and evaporated to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. The contents were placed in a desiccator for 24 hours and weighed to a constant weight to the nearest 0.1 mg.
The filter, acetone and water blanks were analyzed in the same way as their respective sample fractions.

The term "constant weight" means a difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of the total weight less tare weight, whichever is greater between two consecutive readings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation between weighings.



# 2.2.6 Polychlorinated Dibenzo-P-Dioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans (USEPA Method 23)

Dioxins and furans were collected in accordance with USEPA Method 23. Specifically, testing consisted of isokinetically extracting a sample of the stack gas through a modified Method 5 (MM5) sampling train, modified to include a cooling condenser and a resin trap between the filter holder and the first impinger. See Figure 2-2. Samples collected and analyzed included the filter (Container #1 ); probe, nozzle, connecting front-half glassware, back-half glassware and coil condenser, acetone and methylene chloride rinse (Container #2); probe, nozzle, connecting front-half glassware, back-half glassware and coil condenser and toluene rinse (Container #3); and the resin trap, which were capped, labeled and covered with aluminum foil immediately at the conclusion of testing for transport to the laboratory for analysis. The impinger gains were measured and used in isokinetic calculations.

The laboratory analysis was conducted in accordance with the requirements of US EPA Method 23 by ALS Laboratory Group (ALS) located in Burlington, Ontario.

The MM5 train was assembled and leak-checked before sampling commenced. A minimum of 3.4 dry standard cubic meters of stack gas was sampled isokinetically and collected in a heated sample probe and heated filter (front half catch) and a chiller and sorbent trap containing XAD-2 resin (back half catch) during each sampling run. At the end of each run, the sampling train was disassembled, and all train samples were collected. 899-02 

# 2-5coco<p0"'1\.')I0')HeatedZone614(H::•dIIiulmplnqetContents#1:100mLHPLCwater#2:100mi.HPLCwater#3:EmptyInclinedManometerP)#4:200gramsSiHcaGelSorbentModule:XAD·l!ResinKnockoot:EmptyFIGURE2-2.USEPAMETHOD23SAMPLINGTRAIN-,1:1-lceBathVacuumSampleUne,VacuumGauge===!11nil-0=1111111111r:s.==•=..=-•a."•--aa"CD..=..CD•()nr'<As;:oCD()..,se.-ioo0°Q):::03,.....-a'"UCD0Olco,.....'<..wGJ"-->.IQ)QOco,....::::l'o..._::::l'row.....s·<'-Ioc.o::::

# -- 

# - 

# - _.. 

# ___ _ -----..-.- 

# --- 

# -

__ ....._- 

# -------
...**--~­** ,..ENVIRONMENTAL 

### Y" INC, 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 11 of 37 

# SECTION 

# TWO 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

The major components are described below: a) Nozzle

- Borosilicate glass with sharp tapered leading edge. b) Probe- Type 316 stainless steel with borosilicate glass liner and attached pitot tube and stack temperature thermocouple. c) Apex Sample Box- Containing Pyrex glass filter holder, glass fiber filter, a water jacketed sample chiller, sorbent trap containing XAD-2 resin, five GreenburgSmith impingers and the connecting glassware.

The sample adsorbent traps and filters were cleaned and prepared by ALS in Burlington, Ontario using US EPA Method 23 procedures. ARI's laboratory cleaned all Method 23 sampling train glassware to pesticide analytical requirements using procedures outlined in Section 3A of the "Manual of Analytical Methods for the Analysis of Pesticide in Human and Environmental Samples".

The sample traps were spiked with 100 Ill of 100 picograms per Ill of surrogate standards per USEPA Method 23 procedures by ALS. Five surrogate compounds were added to the resin in the adsorbent sampling cartridge before the sample was collected. The surrogate recoveries were measured relative to the internal standards and were a measure of collection efficiency; they were not used to measure native PCDD's and PCDF's. All recoveries were between the methodology requirements.

The sample train was assembled as follows: a) A glass nozzle was selected and attached to the probe. b) A pre-cleaned glass fiber filter was placed in the filter holder and its number recorded on the data sheets. c) The jacket water sample chiller and sorbent trap containing 25 to 40 grams of XAD-2 resin was placed in series after the filter holder.

The back half of the train consisted offive impingers. The first impinger was assembled empty. The second and third impingers contained 100 ml of deionized distilled water. The fourth impinger was assembled empty. The fifth impinger contained 200 grams of silica gel.

The sampling train was then assembled at the sampling location.

D/F sampling began by positioning the probe and sampling nozzle at the first sampling point in the first sample port. Sampling was started and the sampling rate adjusted to maintain an isokinetic sampling rate. The sorbent traps were kept below 68°F to ensure that the XAD resin stayed efficient during the testing.

At the completion of each run, a final leak test was performed on the sampling system.

899-02 

# 2-7

# --- -..:::::::::::::::::. = ._... 

# ___ _**~-** 

# ---- 

# --- 

# -

__ ._.- 

# __ ,.._**-.--~-** "'fff""ENVIRONMENTAL,.... INC. 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3**~** 

# 8/6/10 Page: 12 of 37 

# SECTIONTWO 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

The train was then brought to the ARI mobile laboratory for sample recovery. The probe wash, filter, solvent traps and impinger contents were recovered in strict adherence to US EPA Method 23 protocols.

The samples were recovered, sealed, labeled and levels marked. The traps were wrapped in aluminum foil and stored on ice in a storage chest.

After all chain of custody forms were completed, the samples were transported on ice via ground transportation to the laboratory for analysis. All samples were extracted within 30 days of collection and analyzed within 45 days of extraction.

An elaborate spiking program was applied to the MM5 trains that allowed for complete assessment of the sampling and analytical effort regarding the overall method accuracy. Spiked compounds were placed on the components of the train at the different stages of the sampling and analytical program so that the efficiency of the method's performance could be measured quantitatively. By assuming that these compounds have chemical characteristics that are identical to the D/F target compounds, the overall method efficiency could be assessed. Four types of spiking materials were applied to the MM5 train samples. These types are defined as follows:

• Sampling Surrogate**Spikes~** 

# These compounds are spiked directly onto the**XAD~2** 

# resin at the laboratory during resin tube preparation and prior to any field handling or sampling. The final recovery of these compounds gives the most comprehensive indication that the determination of native compounds using the MM5 methodology is accurate. Good recovery of these compounds will reflect the**XAD~2** 

# resin's ability to capture and retain the various isomers of dioxins and furans.

• Isotope Dilution Internal Standard Spikes -These compounds are placed directly onto the sample just prior to the preparation and extraction steps. The final recovery efficiency of these compounds reflects the overall accuracy of the sample's laboratory handling and analysis. Accordingly, these compounds are used to generate data that indicate the relative accuracy of the analytical methods.

• 0/F Recovery Standards

- These compounds are applied to the sample extracts just before the extracts are introduced onto the GC/MS instrument injection ports. These compounds are precisely applied at this step in the analytical scheme and provide the actual relative response factors that are used to calculate analyte concentrations.

• Matrix Spike Compounds (back-half and spiked resin blanks only) -These compounds are spiked onto a separately prepared aliquot of the MM5 train back half condensate sample or XAD-2 resin before analysis. The spiked aliquots are then analyzed, and the spike recovery is calculated. Recovery of these spikes provides an independent indicator of method accuracy relative to the sample matrix.

Table 2-1 lists the specific isomers that were used to spike the MM5 train and the quantities that were applied. 899-02**2~8**

# ...iiiiiiiiiiii--===. 

# = .-.---- _.-**-~-** 

# - 

# - 

# -

__ ....._- 

# ___ ,_._



# ... 

# --

.._._**~ENVII'/ONMENTAJ..** ...... INC. 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 13 of 37 

# SECTIONTWO 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

TABLE 2-1. USEPA METHOD 23 SPIKE COMPOUNDS AND QUANTITY SPIKED
Spike Type Quantity Spiked 

# Sampling Surrogate Spikes (applied to XAD-2 before field sampling) Dioxin or Furan 37 Cl 4 

# -2,3, 7,8- Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin 10 I"Jg 13 C 12 -1 ,2,3,4, 7 ,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin 10 I"Jg 13 C 12 -2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran 10 'lg 13 C12-1 ,2,3,4, 7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran 10 I"Jg Isotope Dilution Internal Standard Spikes and Surrogate Recovery Compounds (applied to each train 

# half before sample preparation) Dioxin or Furan 13 C 12 -2,3, 7,8- Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin 10 I"Jg 13 C12-1 ,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzodioxin 10 I"Jg 13 C1 2 -1 ,2,3,6, 7 ,8-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin 10 I"Jg 13 C 12 -1 ,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-Heptachlorodibenzodioxin 10 'lg 13 C12-1 ,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8,9-0ctachlorodibenzodioxin 10 I"Jg 13 C1 2 -2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran 10 I"Jg 13 C 12 -1 ,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran 10 I"Jg 13 C1 2 -1 ,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran 10 I"Jg 13 C 1 2-1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran 10 'lg Dioxin and Furan Recovery Standards (applied to extracts prior to sample injection) Dioxin and Furan 13 C 12 -1 ,2,3,4- Tetrachlorodibenzodioxin 10 I"Jg 13 C 12 -1 ,2,3, 7 ,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzodioxin 10 'lg

Notes: 119 

## = Nanogram



### 899-02 

# 2-9

# -- - 

# - ------ 

# ----...-- 

# - 

# - _.._.-



# ---- 

# -
..._._

...**J'!?NVIJ'TON~'riEN7"ALY"** INC. 

# SECTIONTWO Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3-8/6/10 Page: 14 of 37 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

One field blank was obtained for the test. The blank train was assembled and charged with all required reagents in a fashion that was identical to that of the actual sample train. This blank train was heated and leak-checked in the same manner as the actual train, placed near the base of the stack, and sealed for the duration of one sampling run. Upon completion, the blank train samples were recovered applying the same procedures used to collect actual train samples. These blank train samples were analyzed for D/F isomers using the same handling and analysis procedures performed on the actual sampling trains. The results of the blank train samples indicate any possible contamination introduced to the samples by contaminated reagents, improper preparation or handling techniques, or contamination problems due to impure reagents.

One laboratory blank was analyzed for the test program. During the laboratory sample analysis, all samples were combined and then extracted before the GC/MS analysis. The front half rinses were reduced in volume using a Kundera-Danish concentrator apparatus, followed by a nitrogen blow down. The toluene back-half rinse was concentrated in a rotary evaporator. The concentrates were combined, with a total mixture volume of 1-2 ml. The XAD and filter were placed in a Soxhlet extraction apparatus and refluxed with methylene chloride, followed by a subsequent extraction with toluene. These solvents were also reduced in volume as described above. Both extracts were combined, spikes added, and analyzed by GC/MS using Method 23 criteria.

The peak areas for the two ions monitored for each analyte were summed to yield the total response for each analyte. Each internal standard was used to quantify the indigenous PCDD's or PCDF's in its homologous series. For example, the 13 C 12 -2,3,7,8-tetra chlorinated dibenzodioxin was used to calculate the concentrations of all other tetra chlorinated isomers. Recoveries of the tetra- and penta- internal standards were calculated using the 13 C 12 -1 ,2,3,4- TCDD. Recoveries of the hexa- through octa- internal standards were calculated using 13 C 12
- 1 ,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD. Recoveries of the surrogate standards were calculated using the corresponding homolog from the internal standard. When no peak was detected, the noise level, as measured by the intensity of the noise in a clear zone of the chromatogram, was used to calculate the detection limit.

The individual tetra through octa isomers were added together to calculate the total PCDD's and PCDF's in each sample.



# 2.2. 7 Hydrochloric Acid and Hydrogen Fluoride Determination (USEPA Method 26A)

HCI and HF sampling was conducted following USEPA Method 26A. Sample gas was withdrawn isokinetically through a heated glass lined sample probe and heated Teflon filter followed by a series of chilled impingers. Specifically, the front half of the sampling train consisted of a glass nozzle, heated glass lined probe and heated sample box containing a Teflon filter. The back half of the train consisted of five impingers. The first and second impingers (Greenburg-Smith) each contained 100 ml of 0.1 N H2S04, the third and fourth impingers contained 0.1 N NaOH and the fifth impinger contained 200 grams of silica gel. See Figure 2-3.

899-02 

# 2-10co(0<p01\)1\.)I----- ---./Thermocouple"S"TypePilotTubeStackWall""r;;c:::;lProbef5]:Thermocouple--'II'--- _____:lmpingers1-------TemperatureIndicatorOrificeDryTestMeterVacuumPumpFIGURE2-3.USEPAMETHOD26ASAMPLINGTRAINMainValveValveSilicaGelM...c:-:»....-•z:0=5e-·=a:::l•=..•=•"•I••IIII1111111111()or'</\::T-f)>(l)(1)().....CJ)-f()--ac;oo..tu:::03........."0...-a(1)CJQ)"Q)CD<Ccotu··(1)-._-or"a...wG>"(.1J,......_;;en<""-1O<C:5

# --- -==-= Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 16 of 37**~--** 

# -- 

# ---..-- 

# --- =
...... 

# -

__ .... 

# - .._ 

# ...... 

# _ "ffi"'"ENV/ffONMENTAL,.... INC. 

# SECTION TWO 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

At the conclusion of each test run, after the final leak check was performed, the following cleanup procedure was conducted:

1. The contents of impingers 1 and 2 were measured for volume and then placed in Container 1. The impingers were then rinsed with deionized distilled water and the contents placed in this container. The total volume was then measured and the liquid level was marked on the outside of the bottle.

2. The contents of impingers 3 and 4 were measured for moisture and retained but not analyzed.

3. The contents of impinger 5 were placed in Container 2 for subsequent weighing to the nearest gram.
4. A 200 ml reagent blank of the 0.1 N H2S04 was placed in Container 3.
At ARI's laboratory, analysis of the samples was performed in accordance with US EPA Method 26A using ion chromatography techniques.


# 2.2.8 Metals Determination (USEPA Method 29) Sampling and analysis for the following metals were performed in accordance with USEPA Method 29: Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Cobalt (Co) Lead (Pb) Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se)

The samples were withdrawn isokinetically from the exhaust stack and collected in a heated sample probe, heated filter (front half catch) and a series of ice cooled impingers containing an acid/peroxide solution (back half catch).

As shown in Figure 2-4, the metals sampling train used for testing was an Apex Instruments Method 5/29 sampling train. The major components include the following:


# 1.

2.

3.

4.

899-02 

# Nozzle

- Borosilicate glass with sharp tapered leading edge.

Probe- Type 316 stainless steel with borosilicate glass liner and attached pitot tube and stack temperature thermocouple. Apex Sample Box- Containing Pyrex glass filter holder, glass fiber filter, seven Greenburg-Smith impingers and connecting glassware. Apex Control Module- (per USEPA Method 5/29 specifications) containing pump, heat controllers and oil gauge manometers. 2-121\:)I......wDigitalPotentiometerInclinedlmpingerContents:1EmptyManometer(8P)2.100ml5%HNO,J10%Hz023.100ml5%HNO,J10%HzOz4.Empty5.100ml4%KMnOJ10%HzS046.100ml4%KMnOJ10%H2S047.200gsilicageldesiccantHeatedSampleBoxIceBathVacuumSample'Line,VacuumGaugeFIGURE2·4.USEPAMETHOD5129SAMPLINGSYSTEMIs=IIIIil•••rn111hI0f4-·==•=1:1.I•-a"•-.,a"CD1:1.=ClCit()Q)'<;As:o-i)>2:(1)()o0°Q):::03--o-oroCJt»Q)Q)::J(Q-'<(1)2:Q)••··wG>:A-"IQ)0--..Jco-:::To--:::Trow......:;-<--..J0<0:::

# ---- 

# -==:.= Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3**~** 

# 8/6/10 Page: 18 of 37 

# ------- 

# ----..-- 

# --- 

# --

_._. 

# - ___ ._._


# ... 

# -- .._.._ ,..ENVIRONMENTAL

..... INC. 

# SECTIONTWO 

# Testing and AnalYtical Procedures

The sample train was assembled as follows:



# 1 . A glass nozzle was selected and attached to the probe.



# 2. A pre-weighed quartz fiber filter was placed in the filter holder and its number recorded on the data sheets.



# 3. The back half of the train consisted of seven impingers. The first impinger was empty with a shortened stem, the second and third impingers contained 100 ml of dilute nitric acid/hydrogen peroxide mixture, the fourth impinger was empty, the fifth and sixth impingers contained 100 ml of potassium permanganate/sulfuric acid mixture and the seventh impinger contained approximately 200 grams of silica gel. All glassware, filter media and chemicals were prepared in the laboratory in accordance with the required USEPA procedures.



# 4. The sampling train was then assembled at the sampling location.

The metals sampling train was leak checked using the following procedures: a) The pump was started. b) The course flow adjustment valve was opened. c) Flow through the dry gas meter was checked. d) The probe inlet was plugged. e) The fine flow adjustment valve was adjusted so that the vacuum gauge read 

# 15- in. Hg. f) If the flow exceeded 0.02 ACFM, the pump was shut off and all connections were rechecked for tightness and the leak test procedure repeated until acceptable results were obtained.

Crushed ice was added to the impinger compartment and the sample case moved into position outside the first port to be sampled. When the filter holder assembly was properly heated, the nozzle was uncapped and the probe introduced into the stack to the first sampling point. The dry gas meter reading was recorded and sampling was started. At each point, a pitot reading was made and the sampling rate adjusted using calculations based on preliminary temperature, pressure and estimated moisture. When sampling at the last point in the port was completed, the pump was turned off and the probe was carefully removed from that port. The train was operated for a period of 4 hours and a minimum of 3.4 m 3 

# of sample gas was collected.

A final leak test was performed on the sampling train, as previously described. The umbilical cord was disconnected, and the sample case and probe were then disassembled.

899-02 

# 2-14

# -- - 

# -


# -------**~--...-.-** 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3

- 8/6/1 0 Page: 19 of 37 

# - - -'IIIL

- 

# _._.-**-~­** ENVIRONMENTAL

... INC. 

# SECTIONTWO 

# Testing and Analvtical Procedures

Upon completion of each test run and final leak check, the following sampling train clean-up procedure was performed at ARI's laboratory. All probe samples were recovered on-site.

1. The filter was removed from the filter holder and placed in a clean Petri dish and labeled as Container #1.

2. A brush and acetone were used to clean the probe and other fittings as required. The washings from the inner surfaces of the nozzle and upstream portions of the filter holder were collected in a bottle and labeled Container #2.

3. A brush and 0.1 N HN0 3 were then used to rinse the probe and other fittings as required. The washings from the inner surfaces of the nozzle and upstream portions of the filter holder were collected in a bottle and labeled as Container #3.

4. The contents of impingers #1, #2 and #3 were placed in a graduated cylinder to measure the total volume collected then rinsed with 0.1 N HN0 3 , then transferred to a bottle and labeled as Container 

# #4.

5. The contents of impinger 

# #4 were placed in a graduated cylinder to measure the total volume collected then rinsed with 0.1 N HN03, then transferred to a bottle and labeled as Container #5A.

6. The contents of impingers #5 and #6 were placed in a graduated cylinder to measure the total volume collected then rinsed with acidic permanganate solution and Dl water then transferred to a bottle and labeled as Container #58. The impingers were then rinsed with 8N HCI and transferred to a glass bottle and labeled as Container #5C.

7. The contents of impinger #7 were transferred to a clean bottle and labeled as Container #6. The weight of the silica gel was then determined. The difference between this final weight and the initial weight was the total moisture collected by the silica gel.

Containers #1, #2, #3, 

# #4, #5A, #58 and #5C were transported to ALS located in Burlington, Ontario and analyzed for metals by ICAP and CVAA in accordance with USEPA Method 29.

One (1) field blank was collected in conjunction with the test program.

899-02 

# 2-15

# --- - 

# - 

# - - ------


# ----- 

# -- 

# - - _._. 

# -

----- ... 

# --

.._._ ..,ENVIRONMENTAL

...... INC. 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3**~** 

# 8/6/10 Page: 20 of 37 

# SECTIONTHREE 

# Process Description

The vitreous china manufacturing process at Kohler involves firing a molded mixture of various types of clays, flint and feldspar at 2,350°F. The high temperature partially melts the raw materials, resulting in a finished product which is**non~absorbent** 

# (non-porous).

In general, the vitreous china manufacturing process consists of the following steps:

1 ) Mold Making 2) Slip Making and Casting 3) Drying and Glaze Application 4) Kiln Firing 5) Fired Ware Processing

Mold Making: The manufacturing process begins with design and fabrication of a hand-made model of the finished fixture. Once the design is established, a hand-made plaster of paris (gypsum) block mold is produced. The block mold is used to produce an epoxy case mold. The case mold is used to manufacture a large number of plaster of paris production molds. Production molds must be heat dried to be made ready for slip casting. Slip Making and Slip Casting: Kohler's pottery operations utilize china clays, ball clays, flint and feldspar as raw materials. These are carefully mixed with water to make a thick slurry called slip.

The slip is poured into plaster of paris production molds and allowed to set for about one hour. During this time most of the water in the slip is absorbed by the plaster of paris mold. Excess slip is drained from places where it was too thick to set up in the time allowed. This creates internal cavities.

When the casting is sufficiently dry, the mold is disassembled and the casting removed. The casting, firm enough to be handled, is still very fragile. In this state the unfired cast fixture is known as "greenware".

Ware Drying: The greenware fixture is hand-worked by skilled laborers, who smooth rough edges that remain from the mold and punch holes as needed for the finished product. They also assemble components of fixtures that could not be cast as a whole.

The greenware is then subjected to air drying followed by heat drying. As it dries, greenware becomes harder and actually shrinks by over 12% throughout the manufacturing process. When nearly dry, greenware is ready for glazing.

Glaze Application: Colored glaze is sprayed on surfaces that will be exposed after the ware is installed. It is important to distinguish glaze as discussed herein from other materials that are commonly referred to as "glaze". Glaze used at Kohler is a thin layer of clay sprayed onto the surface of the dried greenware. The glaze consists of the following raw materials: kaolin (a fine white clay), feldspar (silica), flint, wollastonite (calcium silicate), an opacifier (zirconium silicate), and pigments.

899-02 

# 3-1

# --- 

# - 

# - 

# - - ._. 

# ___ _

----- -;::;;;- 

# - :::;: 

# -

_ ..... 

# - -
___ _ .... 

# __ ...__

..... ENVIRONMENTAL"""" INC. 

# SECTIONTHREE Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 21 of 37 

# Process Description

The glaze is not oil-based nor does it contain any solvents (volatile or semi-volatile). The glaze is "vitrified" {turning the glaze raw materials into a thin layer of glass) on the ware versus being a residual of some evaporative process. Color is provided by the use of pigments {stains) similar to those used for brick making.

Kiln Firing: When drying and glazing is complete, the fixture is placed in a kiln, where the temperature is slowly raised to 2,350°F. At this temperature, vitrification takes place, and the glaze is permanently fused to the fixture, producing a smooth, glass-like high gloss surface. Any unglazed surfaces are called bisque.

Fire Ware Processing: After firing, the vitreous china fixtures are inspected to confirm superior surface quality, minimum warpage and the absence of flaws. Where possible, pieces that do not meet specs are sent to be reworked. Most often, fixtures to be reworked have surface flaws that must be removed by grinding, and the resulting spot is sprayed with refire glaze and kiln fired again. Some fixtures cannot be reclaimed and must be "culled".

Pieces that pass inspection are ground as necessary {for example, the bottom side of toilets is ground to sit flush on the floor) and packaged for shipment.

899-02 

# 3-2

# --- 

# - - 

# - - 

# ____ _, 

# _

_.-- 

# -..-- 

# ;; ==-- 

# - -
_._. 

# -



# ----- ___ .....__
'f'ENVIRONMENTAL 

### Y' INC. 

# SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3

- 8/6/1 0 Page: 22 of 37 

# Test Results

The results 

# of the emission test program are presented in Tables 4-1 through 4-13.

The calculation summaries are included in Appendix A. All field data are presented in Appendix B. Analytical data are included in Appendix C. Appendix D presents Kohler's process data. The calibration data are included in Appendix 

# E. The test program qualifications are presented in Appendix F.

899-02 

## 4-1

# ---- ..=.===--



# -- ---..-.- 

# -- 

# - - ---- 

# - 

# ----- ... 

# -
,....._ '!Jill" ENVIRONMENTAL

... 1/VC. 

# SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 23 of 37 

# Test Results

TABLE 4-1. TUNNEL KILN 

# #19- POC STACK 

# DIF TEST RESULTS

COMPANY Kohler Company LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST RUN NO. TK19-M23-1 TK19-M23-2 TK19-M23-3 TEST DATE 8/312010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 TEST TIME 07:34- 11:44 13:05-17:15 07:20- 11:33 Average Stack Gas Parameters Temperature, °F 452.9 447.6 445.0 448.5 Velocity, av. ft/sec 27.081 27.795 26.252 27.043 Volumetric flow, acfm 11,012 11,302 10,675 10,996 Volumetric flow, accm 311.82 320.05 302.28 311.38 Volumetric flow, scfm 6,233.8 6,435.6 6,083.2 6,250.9 Volumetric flow, dscfm 5,746.0 5,930.9 5,585.4 5,754.1 Volumetric flow, dscmm 162.71 167.94 158.16 162.94 Volumetric flow, dscfh 344,763 355,854 335,123 345,247 Moisture, av. 

## % vol 7.82 7.84 8.18 7.95 Carbon Dioxide, av.% vol 2.40 2.30 2.60 2.43 Oxygen, av. 

## % vol 16.30 16.20 16.20 16.23
Samele Parameters Time, min 240.0 240.0 240.0 240.0 Volume, dscf 150.955 149.664 147.661 149.427 Volume, dscm 4.275 4.239 4.182 4.232 Total Dioxins collected, nanograms 63.18 59.81 67.07 63.35 Total Furans collected, nanograms 0.23 0.29 0.41 0.31 lsokinetic Ratio, % 97.2 93.4 97.9 96.2
Total Dioxins and Furans Emissions Concentration ng/dscm 

## @ 7% Oxygen 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.07280 0.06224 0.06322 0.06609 Total TCDD 1.32881 1.44433 1.87411 1.54909 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.26294 0.24142 0.33310 0.27915 Total PeCDD 2.66470 2.90960 3.80480 3.12636 1 ,2,3,4, 7,8 HxCDD 0.16539 0.16118 0.12023 0.14893 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.33998 0.30352 0.33875 0.32742 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.55344 0.51842 0.53394 0.53527 Total HxCDD 5.80296 5.31682 5.48796 5.53591 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8 HpCDD 3.42806 3.15381 3.52192 3.36793 Total HpCDD 6.44616 5.96572 6.49221 6.30136 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD {Total) 28.41400 26.09567 29.77362 28.09443 2,3,7,8-TCDF < 

### 0.02545 0.02658 0.02885 < 

### 0.02696 Total TCDF 0.09966 0.09001 0.17680 0.12216 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.00990 0.00858 0.00983 0.00944 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF < 

### 0.01555 0.01605 0.01612 < 

### 0.01591 Total PeCDF 0.05817 0.08861 0.06096 0.06925 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF < 

### 0.00212 0.00521 < 

### 0.00580 < 

### 0.00437 1 ,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF < 

### 0.00431 < 

### 0.00293 < 

### 0.00530 < 

### 0.00418 1 ,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF < 

### 0.00247 < 

### 0.00181 < 

### 0.00559 < 

### 0.00329 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF < 

### 0.00113 < 

### 0.00119 < 

### 0.00636 < 

### 0.00289 Total HxCDF 0.00157 0.00998 0.03246 0.01467 1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF < 

### 0.00424 0.00345 0.00550 < 

### 0.00440 1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF < 

### 0.00064 < 

### 0.00126 < 

### 0.00665 < 

### 0.00285 Total HpCDF < 

### 0.00064 0.00705 0.00941 < 

### 0.00570 1 ,2,3,4,6,5, 7,8 OCDF {Total} < 

### 0.00580 0.00886 0.00721 < 

### 0.00729 TOTAL <44.82246 < 41.93665 < 47.71955 < 44.82622

899-02 

# 4-2---- ------- --- - -

- -

------ -----

--

-

__ ._..-

-----

... -- ._._

..... ENVIROMtiENIAL .... !NO. SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI

Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering

Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 24 of 37 Test Results

TABLE 4-2. TUNNEL KILN #19- POC STACK DIF EMISSIONS SUMMARY (RUN 1)

COMPANY

LOCATION

SOURCE

TEST DATE

TEST RUN NO.

TESTTlME SAMPLE VOLUME

SAMPLE VOLUME

GAS FLOW RATE

OXYGEN CONTENT : DIOXIN I FURAN

COMPOUND 2,3,7,8-TCDD

Total TCDD

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD

Total PeCDD

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD

Total HxCDD

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD

Total HpCDD

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF Total TCDF

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF

Total PeCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF

2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF

Total HxCDF

1 ,2,3,4,6, 7,8 HpCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF

Total HpCDF

1 ,2,3,4,6,5, 7,8 OCDF TOTAL 899-02 Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin

Tunnel Kiln #19- POC

8/3/2010

TK19-M23-1

07:34- 11 :44 150.955 dscf

4.275 dscm

344,763 dscfh

16.3 % TOTAL ESTIMATED

SAMPLE DETECTION

MASS LIMIT

{nanogram) **~nanogram)** 0.10300 < 0.00100

1.88000 < 0.00100

0.37200 < 0.00380

3.77000 < 0.00380

0.23400 < 0.00280

0.48100 < 0.00310

0.78300 < 0.00290

8.21000 < 0.00310

4.85000 < 0.00220

9.12000 < 0.00220

40.20000 < 0.00110

< 0.03600 < 0.00110

0.14100 <0.00110

0.01400 < 0.00230

< 0.02200 < 0.00220

0.08230 < 0.00230

< 0.00300 < 0.00140

< 0.00610 < 0.00130

< 0.00350 < 0.00140

< 0.00160 < 0.00160

0.00222 < 0.00160

< 0.00600 < 0.00071

< 0.00091 < 0.00091

< 0.00091 < 0.00091

< 0.00820 < 0.00046

63.41463 STACK GAS CONCENTRATION

( nanogram/dscm)

(@ 7% Ox:z:gen) 0.07280

1.32881

0.26294

2.66470

0.16539

0.33998

0.55344

5.80296

3.42806

6.44616

28.41400

< 0.02545

0.09966

0.00990

< 0.01555

0.05817

< 0.00212

< 0.00431

< 0.00247

<0.00113

0.00157

< 0.00424

< 0.00064

< 0.00064

< 0.00580

44.82246 PRODUCTION RATE: 1653 lb/hr 749.8 kg/hr DETECTION LIMIT EMISSION EMISSION

STACK GAS STACK GAS EMISSION EMISSION RATE RATE

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION RATE RATE (kg/Mg of (lb/ton of

(nanogram/dscm) (lb/dscf) (lb/hr) (kg/hr) Product) Product)

{@ 7% Oxygen) x10' 12 x10' 9 x10' 9 x10' 9 x10' 9

< 0.00071 0.00150 0.51861 0.23524 0.31374 0.62747

< 0.00071 0.02746 9.46586 4.29368 5.72647 11.45294

< 0.00269 0.00543 1.87303 0.84960 1.13311 2.26622

< 0.00269 0.05506 18.98206 8.61021 11.48340 22.96680

< 0.00198 0.00342 1.17820 0.53443 0.71276 1.42553

< 0.00219 0.00702 2.42185 1.09854 1.46512 2.93025

< 0.00205 0.01144 3.94243 1.78827 2.38501 4.77003

< 0.00219 0.11990 41.33759 18.75061 25.00762 50.01523

< 0.00155 0.07083 24.41989 11.07679 14.77307 29.54615

< 0.00155 0.13319 45.91947 20.82893 27.77947 55.55895

< 0.00078 0.58709 202.40818 91.81175 122.44899 244.89798

< 0.00078 < 0.00053 < 0.18126 < 0.08222 < 0.10966 < 0.21931

< 0.00078 0.00206 0.70994 0.32203 0.42949 0.85897

< 0.00163 0.00020 0.07049 0.03197 0.04264 0.08529

< 0.00155 < 0.00032 < 0.11077 < 0.05025 < 0.06701 < 0.13402

< 0.00163 0.00120 0.41438 0.18796 0.25069 0.50137

< 0.00099 < 0.00004 <0.01511 < 0.00685 < 0.00914 < 0.01828

< 0.00092 < 0.00009 < 0.03071 < 0.01393 < 0.01858 < 0.03716

< 0.00099 < 0.00005 < 0.01762 < 0.00799 < 0.01066 < 0.02132

<0.00113 < 0.00002 < 0.00806 < 0.00365 < 0.00487 < 0.00975

< 0.00113 0.00003 0.01118 0.00507 0.00676 0.01352

< 0.00050 < 0.00009 < 0.03021 < 0.01370 < 0.01828 < 0.03655

< 0.00064 < 0.00001 < 0.00458 < 0.00208 < 0.00277 < 0.00554

< 0.00064 < 0.00001 < 0.00458 < 0.00208 < 0.00277 < 0.00554

< 0.00033 < 0.00012 < 0.04129 < 0.01873 < 0.02498 < 0.04995

0.92613 319.29453 144.83105 193.16063 386.32127 4-3-------------- -- -_,__------------__...------,..._.,.ENVIRONMI:NTAL.....INC.SECTIONFOURKohlerCompany:Kohler,WIClayMACTICRDataGatheringTestDates:8/3-8/6/10Page:25of37TestResultsTABLE4-3.TUNNELKILN#19-POCSTACKDIFEMISSIONSSUMMARY(RUN2)COMPANYLOCATIONSOURCETESTDATETESTRUNNO.TESTTIMESAMPLEVOLUMESAMPLEVOLUMEGASFLOWRATEOXYGENCONTENT:DIOXINIFURANCOMPOUND2,3,7,8-TCDDTotaiTCDD1,2,3,7,8PeCDDTotalPeCDD1,2,3,4,7,8HxCDD1,2,3,6,7,8HxCDD1,2,3,7,8,9HxCDDTotalHxCDD1,2,3,4,6,7,8HpCDDTotalHpCDD1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8OCDD2,3,7,8·TCDFTotalTCDF1,2,3,7,8PeCDF2,3,4,7,8PeCDFTotalPeCDF1,2,3,4,7,8HxCDF1,2,3,6,7,8HxCDF1,2,3,7,8,9HxCDF2,3,4,6,7,8HxCDFTotalHxCDF1,2,3,4,6,7,8HpCDF1,2,3,4,7,8,9HpCDFTotalHpCDF1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8OCDFTOTAL899-02KohlerCompanyKohler,WisconsinTunnelKiln#19-POC8/3/2010TK19-M23-213:05-17:15149.6644.239355,85416.2TOTALSAMPLEMASS{nanogram)0.089202.070000.346004.170000.231000.435000.743007.620004.520008.5500037.400000.038100.129000.012300.023000.127000.00746<0.00420<0.00260<0.001700.014300.00494<0.001800.010100.0127060.10310dscfdscmdscfh%ESTIMATEDDETECTIONLIMIT{nanogram)<0.00220<0.00220<0.01200<0.01200<0.01500<0.01700<0.01600<0.01700<0.00420<0.00420<0.00430<0.00140<0.00140<0.00400<0.00380<0.00400<0.00150<0.00140<0.00150<0.00170<0.00170<0.00140<0.00180<0.00180<0.00110PRODUCTIONRATE:DETECTIONLIMITSTACKGASSTACKGASCONCENTRATIONCONCENTRATION(nanogram/dscm)(nanogram/dscm)(@7%(@7%0.06224<0.001541.44433<0.001540.24142<0.008372.90960<0.008370.16118<0.010470.30352<0.011860.51842<0.011165.31682<0.011863.15381<0.002935.96572<0.0029326.09567<0.003000.02658<0.000980.09001<0.000980.00858<0.002790.01605<0.002650.08861<0.002790.00521<0.00105<0.00293<0.00098<0.00181<0.00105<0.00119<0.001190.00998<0.001190.00345<0.00098<0.00126<0.001260.00705<0.001260.00886<0.0007741.936651653lb/hr749.8kg/hrSTACKGASCONCENTRATION(lb/dscf)x10-120.001310.030490.005100.061430.003400.006410.010940.112240.066580.125940.550910.000560.001900.000180.000340.001870.00011<0.00006<0.00004<0.000030.000210.00007<0.000030.000150.000190.88534EMISSIONRATE(lb/hr)x10'90.4675710.850601.8136821.858461.210862.280203.8946839.9428023.6931044.81771196.044700.199710.676200.064470.120560.665710.03910<0.02202<0.01363<0.008910.074960.02589<0.009440.052940.06657315.05065EMISSIONRATE(kg/hr)x10'90.212094.921800.822689.914930.549241.034291.7666218.1179310.7471220.3291888.925290.090590.306720.029250.054690.301970.01774<0.00999<0.00618<0.004040.034000.01175<0.004280.024010.03020142.90604EMISSIONEMISSIONRATERATE(kg/Mgof(lb/tonofProduct)Product)x10'9x1o·90.282860.565736.5641913.128381.097202.1944013.2235126.447020.732531.465051.379432.758862.356134.7122624.1638248.3276414.3334028.6667927.1129554.22590118.59934237.198670.120820.241640.409070.818150.039000.078010.072940.145870.402730.805460.023660.04731<0.01332<0.02664<0.00824<0.01649<0.00539<0.010780.045350.090690.015670.03133<0.00571<0.011420.032030.064060.040270.08055190.59325381.186514-4----

- -

- -

._. ...... __ _

-

.......... .-- --

- _._. - -----

.... -- ._._ 'lfJI"'ENVIRONMENTAL ..... INC. SECTIONFO UR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI

Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering

Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 26 of 37 Test Results

TABLE 4-4. TUNNEL KILN #19- POC STACK DIF EMISSIONS SUMMARY (RUN 3)

COMPANY

LOCATION

SOURCE

TEST DATE

TEST RUN NO.

TEST TIME SAMPLE VOLUME

SAMPLE VOLUME

GAS FLOW RATE

OXYGEN CONTENT : DIOXIN I FURAN

COMPOUND 2,3,7,8-TCDD Total TCDD

1 ,2,3, 7,8 PeCDD

Total PeCDD

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD

Total HxCDD

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD

Total HpCDD

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF Total TCDF

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF

Total PeCDF

1 ,2,3,4.7 ,8 HxCDF

1 ,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF

2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF

Total HxCDF

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF

Total HpCDF

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF TOTAL 899-02 Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin

Tunnel Kiln #19 POC

8/4/2010

TK19-M23-3 07:20 - 11 :33 147.661

4.182

335,123

16.2 TOTAL

SAMPLE

MASS {nanogram! 0.08940

2.65000

0.47100

5.38000

0.17000

0.47900

0.75500

7.76000

4.98000

9.18000

42.10000

0.04080

0.25000

0.01390. 0.02280

0.08620

< 0.00820

< 0.00750

< 0.00790

< 0.00900

0.04590

0.00778

< 0.00940

0.01330

0.01020 67.47560 dscf dscm

dscfh % ESTIMATED

DETECTION

LIMIT {nanogram) <0.00099

< 0.00099

<0.00410

<0.00410

< 0.00310

< 0.00340

< 0.00320

< 0.00340

< 0.00830

< 0.00830

< 0.00300

< 0.00320

< 0.00320

< 0.00320

< 0.00310

< 0.00320

<0.00820

< 0.00750

< 0.00790

< 0.00900

< 0.00900

< 0.00740

< 0.00940

< 0.00940

< 0.00220 PRODUCTION RATE: DETECTION LIMIT

STACK GAS STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

(nanogram/dscm) (nanogram/dscm)

{@ 7% **Ox~gen)**

**{~** 7% oxxgen}

0.06322 < 0.00070

1.87411 < 0.00070

0.33310 < 0.00290

3.80480 < 0.00290

0.12023 < 0.00219

0.33875 < 0.00240

0.53394 < 0.00226

5.48796 < 0.00240

3.52192 < 0.00587

6.49221 < 0.00587

29.77362 < 0.00212

0.02885 < 0.00226

0.17680 < 0.00226

0.00983 < 0.00226

0.01612 < 0.00219

0.06096 < 0.00226

< 0.00580 < 0.00580

< 0.00530 < 0.00530

< 0.00559 < 0.00559

< 0.00636 < 0.00636

0.03246 < 0.00636

0.00550 < 0.00523

< 0.00665 < 0.00665

0.00941 < 0.00665

0.00721 < 0.00156
47.71955 1751 lb/hr 794.2 kg/hr STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION

(lb/dscf)

x10. 12 0.00133

0.03956

0.00703

0.08032

0.00254

0.00715

0.01127

0.11586

0.07435

0.13706

0.62856

0.00061

0.00373

0.00021

0.00034

0.00129

< 0.00012

< 0.00011

< 0.00012

< 0.00013

0.00069

0.00012

< 0.00014

0.00020 0.00015 1.00742 EMISSION RATE

(lb/hr)

x10' 9 0.44731

13.25913

2.35662

26.91853

0.85059

2.39665

3.77760

38.82672

24.91715

45.93161

210.64497

0.20414

1.25086

0.06955

0.11408

0.43130

< 0.04103

< 0.03753

< 0.03953

< 0.04503

0.22966

0.03893

< 0.04703

0.06655 0.05104 337.61035 EMISSION RATE

(kg/hr)

x10' 9 0.20290

6.01430

1.06896

12.21016

0.38582

1.08711

1.71351

17.61169

11.30234

20.83444

95.54793

0.09260 0.56739

0.03155

0.05175

0.19563

< 0.01861

< 0.01702

< 0.01793

< 0.02043

0.10417

0.01766

< 0.02133

0.03018 0.02315 153.13905 EMISSION EMISSION

RATE RATE

(kg/Mg of (lb/ton of

Product) Product)

x10' 9 x10'9 0.25546 0.51092

7.57232 15.14463

1.34587 2.69174

15.37323 30.74646

0.48577 0.97154

1.36873 2.73746

2.15740 4.31479

22.17403 44.34805

14.23024 28.46048

26.23165 52.46329

120.29981 240.59963

0.11659 0.23317

0.71437 1.42874

0.03972 0.07944

0.06515 0.13030

0.24631 0.49263

< 0.02343 < 0.04686

< 0.02143 < 0.04286

< 0.02257 < 0.04515

< 0.02572 < 0.05143

0.13116 0.26232

0.02223 0.04446

< 0.02686 < 0.05372

0.03800 0.07601 0.02915 0.05829 192.81003 385.62005 4-5

# --- 

# - - - 

# -


# ----- --------- 

# -- 

# - 

# - _._. 

# -



# -----
.... 

# --

...... 

# _ ..,.. ENVIRONMENTAL

... /NO. 

# SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 27 of 37 

# Test Results

TABLE 4-5. 

# TUNNEL KILN #19- POC STACK FPM AND METALS TEST RESULTS

COMPANY Kohler Company LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE Tunnel Kiln #19- POC
TEST RUN NO. TK19-M29-1 TK19-M29-2 TK19-M29-3 TEST DATE 8/3/2010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 TEST TIME 07:34

- 11:04 13:05- 17:15 07:20- 11:33 Average
Process Parameters Process Rate, kg of ware/hr 749.8 749.8 794.2 764.6 Stack Gas Parameters Temperature, av. °F 448.7 447.0 445.3 447.0 Velocity, av. ftlsec 26.830 27.577 26.300 26.902 Volume flow, acfm 10,910 11,214 10,694 10,939 Volume flow, acmm 308.93 317.53 302.82 309.76 Volume flow, scfm 6,204.5 6,389.3 6,092.1 6,228.6 Volume flow, dscfm 5,746.1 5,877.4 5,605.4 5,743.0 Volume flow, dscmm 162.7 166.4 158.7 162.62 Volume flow, dscfh 344,766 352,646 336,322 344,578 Moisture, av. % vol 7.39 8.01 7.99 7.80 C02, av. % vol, db 2.4 2.3 2.6 2.4 

## 02, av. % vol, db 16.3 16.2 16.2 16.2
Metals Sample Time, min 240.0 240.0 240.0 240.0 Volume, dscf 159.950 164.640 156.177 160.256 Volume, dscm 4.530 4.663 4.423 4.538 lsokinetic Ratio, % 101.4 102.0 101.5 101.6 Antimony (Sbl Concentration lb/dscf X 

### 1 0' 9 

### < 

### 0.00413 < 

### 0.00790 0.07229 < 

### 0.02811 J.!Q/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 

## < 0.200 

## < 0.374 3.425 

## < 1.333 Emission rate lb/hr x 10- 4 

### < 

### 0.01426 < 

### 0.02786 0.24312 < 

### 0.09508 lb/ton of product x 10-4 < 

### 0.01725 < 

### 0.03371 0.27769 < 

### 0.10955 kg/hr x 10-4 

## < 0.00647 

## < 0.01264 0.11028 

## < 0.04313 kg/Mg of product x 10' 4 

## < 0.00862 

## < 0.01685 0.13885 

## < 0.05478
Arsenic (As) Concentration lb/dscf x 1**o-~** 

### 0.20895 0.39234 0.48841 0.36323 J.!Q/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 10.114 18.587 23.138 17.280 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 0.72039 1.38357 1.64265 1.24887 lb/ton of product x 10-4 0.87162 1.67401 1.87624 1.47395 kg/hr x 10' 4 

### 0.32677 0.62758 0.74510 0.56648 kg/Mg of product x 10-4 0.43581 0.83700 0.93812 0.73698 Beryllium (Be) Concentration lb/dscf x 10- 8 

### < 

### 0.00413 < 

### 0.00402 < 

### 0.00423 < 

### 0.00413 J.!Q/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 

## < 0.200 

## < 0.190 

## < 0.201 

## < 0.197 Emission rate lb/hr x 10' 4 

### < 

### 0.01426 < 

### 0.01417 < 

### 0.01424 < 

### 0.01422 lb/ton of product x 1 0-4 < 

### 0.01725 < 

### 0.01714 < 

### 0.01627 < 

### 0.01689 kg/hr x 10-4 

## < 0.00647 

## < 0.00643 

## < 0.00646 

## < 0.00645 kg/Mg of product x 10-4 

## < 0.00862 

## < 0.00857 

## < 0.00813 

## < 0.00844

899-02 

# 4-6

# -- 

# - 

# - 

# - - Kohler Company: Kohler, WI 

# --- -- - - 

# -...--

...... 

# - 

# - Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering 

# - --..-.. 

# - - 

# ----**~--** 

# ...... 

# - Test Dates: 8/3-8/6/10

..

ENV/1'/0NMENTAL

.... INC. 

# Page: 28 of 37 

# SECTIONFOUR Test Results

TABLE 4-5 (CONTINUED). TUNNEL KILN 

# #19- POC STACK FPM AND METALS TEST RESULTS

TEST RUN NO. TK19-M29-1 TK19-M29-2 TK19-M29-3 TEST DATE 8/3/2010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 TEST TIME 07:34

- 11 :04 13:05-17:15 07:20- 11:33 Average Cadmium {Cd} Concentration lb/dscfx 10·\l < 

### 0.00207 < 

### 0.00201 < 

### 0.00355 < 

### 0.00254 IJ.g/dscm 

## @ 7% 

## 02 

## < 0.100 

## < 0.095 

## < 0.168 

## < 0.121 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 < 

### 0.00713 < 

### 0.00708 < 

### 0.01193 < 

### 0.00871 lb/ton of product x 10-4 < 

### 0.00862 < 

### 0.00857 < 

### 0.01363 < 

### 0.01027 kg/hr x 10-4 

## < 0.00323 

## < 0.00321 

## < 0.00541 

## < 0.00395 kg/Mg of product x 10-4 

## < 0.00431 

## < 0.00429 

## < 0.00681 

## < 0.00514 Chromium {Cr} Concentration lb/dscf x 1 o·!! 0.18133 0.24209 0.39890 0.27411 IJ.9/dscm 

## @ 7% 

## 02 8.777 11.469 18.898 13.048 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 0.62516 0.85370 1.34160 0.94016 lb/ton of product x 10-4 0.75640 1.03291 1.53239 1.10723 kg/hr x 10-4 0.28357 0.38724 0.60855 0.42645 kg/Mg of product x 10-4 0.37820 0.51646 0.76619 0.55362 Cobalt {Co} Concentration lb/dscf x 1 o·!! 0.00648 0.00556 0.00819 0.00674 IJ.g/dscm 

## @ 7% 

## 02 0.314 0.263 0.388 0.322 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 0.02233 0.01960 0.02754 0.02316 lb/ton of product x 10-4 0.02702 0.02371 0.03145 0.02739 kg/hr x 10-4 0.01013 0.00889 0.01249 0.01050 kg/Mg of product x 10-4 0.01351 0.01186 0.01573 0.01370
Lead {Pb} Concentration lb/dscf X 

### 1 0·!! 0.57271 0.72381 0.64593 0.64748 IJ.9/dscm 

## @ 7% 

## 02 27.722 34.290 30.601 30.871 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 1.97452 2.55247 2.17242 2.23314 lb/ton of product x 1 0-4 2.38901 3.08829 2.48135 2.65288 kg/hr x 10-4 0.89564 1.15779 0.98540 1.01294 kg/Mg of product x 10-4 1.19451 1.54414 1.24068 1.32644**Mercur~** 

### {Hg} Concentration lb/dscf x 10·!! 0.32061 0.35313 0.36879 0.34751 IJ.Q/dscm 

## @ 7% 

## 02 15.519 16.730 17.471 16.573 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 1.10537 1.24531 1.24033 1.19700 lb/ton of product x 10-4 1.33741 1.50673 1.41671 1.42028 kg/hr x 10-4 0.50139 0.56487 0.56261 0.54296 kg/Mg of product x 10-4 0.66870 0.75337 0.70835 0.71014

899-02

# - -- - 

# - Kohler Company: Kohler, WI 

# - 

# - --- 

# -- - 

# ----- 

# - 

# - Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering 

# - 

# --- - - 

# ---- Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 

# ... __ .._._

..,... ENVIRONMENTAL 

### Y INC. 

# Page: 29 of 37 

# SECTIONFOUR Test Results

TABLE 4-5 (CONTINUED). TUNNEL KILN 

# #19- POC STACK FPM AND METALS TEST RESULTS

TEST RUN NO. TK19-M29-1 TK19-M29-2 TK19-M29-3 TEST DATE 8/3/2010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 TEST TIME 13:05- 17:15 07:20- 11:33 Average Manganese (Mn} Concentration lb/dscf X 

### 1

**o·~** 

### 0.01154 0.02085 0.01995 0.01744 Jl.Q/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 0.558 0.988 0.945 0.830 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 0.03977 0.07352 0.06708 0.06013 lb/ton of product 

## x 10-4 0.04812 0.08896 0.07662 0.07123 kg/hr x

**10""'~** 

### 0.01804 0.03335 0.03043 0.02727 kg/Mg of product x

**10""'~** 

### 0.02406 0.04448 0.03831 0.03562
Nickel (Ni} Concentration lb/dscf 

## x 10·\l 0.10664 < 0.03482 0.05505 < 0.06550 Jl.Q/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 5.162 1.649 2.608 3.140 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 0.36766 < 0.12277 0.18515 < 0.22519 lb/ton of product x 10-4 0.44483 <0.14855 0.21148 <0.26829 kg/hr x

**10""'~** 

### 0.16677 <0.05569 0.08399 <0.10215 kg/Mg of product x

**10""'~** 

### 0.22242 <0.07427 0.10574 <0.13414 Selenium (Se} Concentration lb/dscf 

## x 1 o·\l 0.26643 0.54861 0.55335 0.45613 Jl.Q/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 12.896 25.990 26.215 21.700 Emission rate lb/hr x 10-4 0.91855 .1.93463 1.86103 1.57140 lb/ton of product x 10-4 1.11137 2.34075 2.12568 1.85927 kg/hr x

**10""'~** 

### 0.41665 0.87754 0.84416 0.71278 kg/Mg of product x

**10-'~** 

### 0.55568 1.17038 1.06284 0.92963 Filterable PM collected, mg 18.21 18.52 16.31 11.78 Concentration gr/dscf 0.00176 0.00174 0.00161 0.00170 lb/dscf x 1 0-!5 0.25103 0.24804 0.23027 0.24311 mg/dscm @ 7% 

## 02 12.149 11.748 10.907 11.602 Emission rate lb/hr 0.08652 0.08744 0.07742 0.08379 lb/ton of product 0.10468 0.10580 0.08843 0.09964 kg/hr 0.03925 0.03966 0.03512 0.03801 kg/Mg of product 0.05234 0.05290 0.04422 0.04982

899-02 

# 4-8

# --- 

# - 

# - 

# - -


# ------ ,....,-- 

# ---- 

# --

- - -w..

- 

# -----**--.--~-** .... ENVIRONMENTAL

.... /NO. 

# SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 30 of 37 

# Test Results

TABLE 4-6. TUNNEL KILN #19- POC STACK HCI AND HF TEST RESULTS

COMPANY LOCATION SOURCE

TEST RUN NO. TEST DATE TEST TIME



## Process Parameters Process Rate, kg of ware/hr


## Stack Gas Parameters Temperature, av. 

## oF Velocity, av. ft/sec Volume flow, acfm 

## Volume flow, acmm Volume flow, scfm Volume flow, dscfm 

## Volume flow, dscmm Volume flow, dscfh 

## Moisture, av.% vol C02, av.% val, db 02, av.% vol, db 

## Sample Data Sample Volume, dscf % lsokinetic 

## Hydrogen Chloride CHCI) Concentration ppmv db 

## ppmv db@ 7% 02 lb/dscf x 1o·o Emission rate lb/hr lb/ton of Product 

## kg/hr kg/Mg of Product Hydrogen Fluoride (HFl Concentration ppmv db 

## ppmv db @ 7% 02 lb/dscf x 1 

## O..o Emission rate lb/hr lblton of Product 

## kg/hr kg/Mg of Product

899-02 Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin Tunnel Kiln #19- POC

TK19-M26A-1 TK19-M26A-2 8/4/2010 8/4/2010 12:30- 13:33 13:45- 14:47

794.2 794.2

455.8 452.3

26.409 25.867 10,739 10,518 

## 304.08 297.84 6,060 5,958 5,543.0 5,446.9



## 156.96 154.24 332,581 326,814 

## 8.53 8.58 2.4 2.3 

## 16.0 16.1

39.033 38.314 102.6 102.5

0.56 0.48 

## 1.60 1.39 0.053 0.045

0.01777 0.01482 0.02030 0.01692 

## 0.00806 0.00672 0.01015 0.00846

16.7 17.3 

## 47.29 50.18

0.866 0.900

0.28796 0.29411 0.32891 0.33594 

## 0.13062 0.13341 0.16446 0.16797 TK19-M26A-3 8/4/2010 15:05- 16:06 Average

794.2 794.2

450.8 453.0

25.948 26.075 10,551 10,603 

## 298.77 300.23 5,987 6,001 5,500.0 5,496.6



## 155.74 155.65 330,001 329,799 

## 8.13 8.41 2.4 2.4 

## 15.9 16.0

38.360 101.6

0.56 0.54 

## 1.56 1.52 0.053 0.051

0.01753 0.01671 0.02003 0.01908 

## 0.00795 0.00758 0.01001 0.00954

17.0 17.0 

## 47.27 48.25

0.883 0.883

0.29145 0.29117 0.33289 0.33258 

## 0.13220 0.13208 0.16645 0.16629



# 4-9

# --- 

# - - 

# - - .....,. 

# ...... 

# __ .....

..... 

# ---- 

# -- 

# -**--~-** 

# -----
... 

# --

..... 

# -
'IJI"'ENVIRONMENrAL

.... INC. 

# SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 31 of 37 

# Test Results

TABLE 4-7. TUNNEL KILN 

# #19- RCE STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW TEST RESULTS

COMPANY Kohler Company LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE TK-19 Rapid Cool Exhaust
TEST RUN NO. TK19-RCE-1 TK19-RCE-2 TK19-RCE-3 TEST DATE 8/3/2010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 TEST TIME 07:34- 11:04 13:05-17:15 07:20

- 11 :33 Average

Process Parameters 

## Process Rate, kg of ware/hr 749.8 749.8 794.2 764.6
Stack Gas Parameters 

## Temperature, av. 

# oF 293.3. 293.1 281.8 289.4 Velocity, av. ftlsec 9.419 8.489 8.399 8.769 Volume flow, acfm 1,666.3 1,501.7 1,485.7 1,551.2 Volume flow, acmm 47.184 42.522 42.071 43.925 

## C0 2 , 

## av.% val, db 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 2 , 

## av. 

## % vol, db 20.7 20.8 20.6 20.7

899-02 

# 4-10

# --- - 

# - 

# - - _._...._, 

# __

........ 

# ---- 

# -- 

# -

__ ..... 

# -

----- ... 

# --
,......_**..,..ENV/RONMENTA~** ..... INC, 

# SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 32 of 37 

# Test Results

TABLE 4-8. TUNNEL KILN 

# #19- WEE STACK VOLUMETRIC FLOW TEST RESULTS

COMPANY Kohler Company LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE TK-19 Ware Exit Exhaust
TEST RUN NO. TK19-WEE-1 TK19-WEE-2 TK19-WEE-3 TEST DATE 8/3/2010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 TEST TIME 07:34

- 11 :04 13:05- 17:15 07:20

- 11 :33 Average


## Process Parameters Process Rate, kg of ware/hr 749.8 749.8 794.2 764.6


## Stack Gas Parameters Temperature, av. 

# oF 316.9 312.6 299.3 309.6 Velocity, av. ft/sec 40.592 40.656 40.281 40.510 Volume flow, acfm 9,505.4 9,520.4 9,432.4 9,486.0 

## Volume flow, acmm 

## 269.16 269.58 267.09 268.61 C02, av.% val, db 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 

## 0 2 , 

## av. % vol, db 

## 20.6 20.6 20.6 20.6

899-02 

# 4-11

# -===--=



# -- ----- 

# -- 

# - 

# --.-..- -
___ _ 

# ... __ ....__

..... ENVIRONMENTAL

..... INC. 

# SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3

- 8/6/1 0 Page: 33 of 37 

# Test Results

TABLE 4-9. WARE DRYER #1 STACK D/F TEST RESULTS

COMPANY LOCATION SOURCE TEST RUN NO. TEST DATE TEST TIME 

### Stack Gas Parameters Temperature, °F Velocity, av. ft/sec Volumetric flow, acfm 

### Volumetric flow, acmm Volumetric flow, scfm Volumetric flow, dscfm 

### Volumetric flow, dsccm Volumetric flow, dscfh 

### Moisture, av. % vol Carbon Dioxide, av.% vol 

### Oxygen, av. 

## % vol Sample Parameters Time, min Volume, dscf Volume, dscm Total Dioxins collected, nanograms Total Furans collected, nanograms lsokinetic Ratio, % Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin Ware Dryer #1 WD1-M23-1

8/5/2010

179.0

18.204 3,360.3 

## 95.153 2,708.3 2,494.1 

## 70.625 149,648 

## 7.91 0.1 

## 20.7

240.0 148.896

4.217 1.62 0.01 98.7 

### Total Dioxins and Furans Emissions Concentration 

### ng/dscm 2,3,7,8-TCDD TotaiTCDD 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD Total PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 1 ,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD Total HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD Total HpCDD 1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7 ,8 OCDD (Total) 2,3,7,8-TCDF Total TCDF 1 ,2,3,7 ,8 PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF Total PeCDF 1 ,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 1 ,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 1 ,2,3,7 ,8,9 HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF Total HxCDF 1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF Total HpCDF 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF (Total) 

### TOTAL

899-02 < 

### 0.00059
< 

### 0.00059
< 

### 0.00074



## 0.00208
< 

### 0.00083
< 

### 0.00218
< 

### 0.00237
< 

### 0.00059



## 0.03296 0.06142 0.32015
< 

### 0.00026
< 

### 0.00026
< 

### 0.00028
< 0.00026
< 

### 0.00028
< 

### 0.00020

< 

### 0.00019
< 

### 0.00031
< 

### 0.00022
< 

### 0.00022
< 

### 0.00052
< 

### 0.00022
< 

### 0.00022
< 

### 0.00031


### < 

## 0.38613 WD1-M23-2 8/5/2010 12:17- 16:20

179.1

17.695 3,266.4 

## 92.493 2,631.5 2,444.2 

## 69.210 146,650 

## 7.12 0.0 

## 20.8

240.0 144.938

4.105 0.90 0.01 98.1

< 

### 0.00117
< 

### 0.00061
< 

### 0.00139



## 0.00407
< 

### 0.00046
< 

### 0.00205
< 

### 0.00236



## 0.00577 0.01873 0.03459 0.17321

< 

### 0.00027

< 

### 0.00027
< 

### 0.00039
< 

### 0.00037
< 

### 0.00039

< 

### 0.00015

< 

### 0.00013
< 

### 0.00014
< 

### 0.00016
< 

### 0.00016

< 

### 0.00041
< 

### 0.00021
< 

### 0.00021
< 

### 0.00032


### < 

## 0.21960 WD1-M23-3 8/6/2010 07:30-11:12

177.8

18.088 3,338.8 

## 94.544 2,705.6 2,507.2 

## 70.996 150,433 

## 7.33 0.0 

## 20.8

240.0 148.931

4.218 2.61 0.01 98.2

< 

### 0.00066
< 

### 0.00066



## 0.00173 0.00683 0.00165

< 

### 0.00168



## 0.00427 0.01283 0.04552 0.08346 0.51448

< 

### 0.00038
< 

### 0.00038
< 

### 0.00047

< 

### 0.00047
< 

### 0.00047



## 0.00040

< 

### 0.00020
< 

### 0.00022
< 

### 0.00024



## 0.00040

< 

### 0.00026
< 

### 0.00026
< 

### 0.00033
< 

### 0.00052


### < 

## 0.62036 Average

178.6

17.996 3,321.8 

## 94.063 2,681.8 2,481.8 

## 70.277 148,910 

## 7.45 0.0 

## 20.8

240.0 147.588

4.180 1.71 0.01 98.3

< 

### 0.00081
< 

### 0.00062
< 

### 0.00129



## 0.00433
< 

### 0.00098
< 

### 0.00197
< 

### 0.00300
< 

### 0.00640



## 0.03241 0.05982 0.33595
< 

### 0.00030
< 

### 0.00030
< 

### 0.00038
< 

### 0.00037
< 

### 0.00038
< 

### 0.00025
< 

### 0.00018
< 

### 0.00022
< 

### 0.00021
< 

### 0.00026
< 

### 0.00040
< 

### 0.00023
< 

### 0.00025
< 0.00038


## < 

## 0.40870



# 4-12-- --- -

- -

- - **~--** .....-- -- -.- ...... -- -- _._. - -----

... -- ._._

.... ENVIRONMENTAL ..... /NO. SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI

Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering

Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 34 of 37 Test Results

TABLE 4-10. WARE DRYER #1 STACK DIF EMISSIONS SUMMARY (RUN 1)

COMPANY Kohler Company

LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE Ware Dryer #1

TEST DATE 8/5/2010

TEST RUN NO. WD1-M23-1

TEST TIME 07:35- 11:37

SAMPLE VOLUME : 148.896 dscf PRODUCTION RATE: 2045 lb/hr

SAMPLE VOLUME : 4.217 dscm 927.6 kg/hr

GAS FLOW RATE : 149,648 dscfh

OXYGEN CONTENT : 20.7 %

EMISSION EMISSION

TOTAL ESTIMATED DETECTION LIMIT STACK GAS EMISSION EMISSION RATE RATE

SAMPLE DETECTION STACK GAS STACK GAS CONCENTRATION RATE RATE (kg/Mg of (lb/ton of

DIOXIN I FURAN MASS LIMIT CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION (lb/dscf) (lb/hr) (kg/hr) Product) Product)

COMPOUND (nanosram} {nanosraml inanogram/dscml {nanosram/dscml x10- 12 x1o· 9 x10' 9 x10' 9 x1o· 9

2,3,7,8-TCDD < 0.00250 < 0.00250 < 0.00059 < 0.00059 < 0.00004 < 0.00554 < 0.00251 < 0.00271 < 0.00542

Total TCDD < 0.00250 < 0.00250 < 0.00059 < 0.00059 < 0.00004 < 0.00554 < 0.00251 < 0.00271 < 0.00542

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD < 0.00310 < 0.00310 < 0.00074 < 0.00074 < 0.00005 < 0.00687 < 0.00312 < 0.00336 < 0.00672

Total PeCDD 0.00878 < 0.00310 0.00208 < 0.00074 0.00013 0.01945 0.00882 0.00951 0.01903

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD < 0.00350 < 0.00230 < 0.00083 < 0.00055 < 0.00005 < 0.00776 < 0.00352 < 0.00379 < 0.00758

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD < 0.00920 < 0.00250 < 0.00218 < 0.00059 < 0.00014 < 0.02038 < 0.00925 < 0.00997 < 0.01994

1 ,2,3, 7,8,9 HxCDD < 0.01000 < 0.00230 < 0.00237 < 0.00055 < 0.00015 < 0.02216 < 0.01005 < 0.01083 < 0.02167

Total HxCDD < 0.00250 < 0.00250 < 0.00059 < 0.00059 < 0.00004 < 0.00554 < 0.00251 < 0.00271 < 0.00542

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.13900 < 0.00620 0.03296 < 0.00147 0.00206 0.30799 0.13970 0.15061 0.30121

Total HpCDD 0.25900 < 0.00620 0.06142 < 0.00147 0.00383 0.57388 0.26031 0.28062 0.56125

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 1.35000 < 0.00190 0.32015 < 0.00045 0.01999 2.99124 1.35682 1.46271 2.92542

2,3,7,8-TCDF < 0.00110 < 0.00110 < 0.00026 < 0.00026 < 0.00002 < 0.00244 < 0.00111 < 0.00119 < 0.00238

TotaiTCDF < 0.00110 < 0.00110 < 0.00026 < 0.00026 < 0.00002 < 0.00244 < 0.00111 < 0.00119 < 0.00238

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF < 0.00120 < 0.00120 < 0.00028 < 0.00028 < 0.00002 < 0.00266 < 0.00121 < 0.00130 < 0.00260

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF < 0.00110 < 0.00110 < 0.00026 < 0.00026 < 0.00002 < 0.00244 < 0.00111 < 0.00119 < 0.00238

Total PeCDF < 0.00120 < 0.00120 < 0.00028 < 0.00028 < 0.00002 < 0.00266 < 0.00121 < 0.00130 < 0.00260

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00086 < 0.00086 < 0.00020 < 0.00020 < 0.00001 < 0.00191 < 0.00086 < 0.00093 < 0.00186

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00079 < 0.00079 < 0.00019 < 0.00019 < 0.00001 < 0.00175 < 0.00079 < 0.00086 < 0.00171

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF < 0.00130 < 0.00083 < 0.00031 < 0.00020 < 0.00002 < 0.00288 < 0.00131 < 0.00141 < 0.00282

2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00094 < 0.00094 < 0.00022 < 0.00022 < 0.00001 < 0.00208 < 0.00094 < 0.00102 < 0.00204

Total HxCDF < 0.00094 < 0.00094 < 0.00022 < 0.00022 < 0.00001 < 0.00208 < 0.00094 < 0.00102 < 0.00204

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF < 0.00220 < 0.00071 < 0.00052 < 0.00017 < 0.00003 < 0.00487 < 0.00221 < 0.00238 < 0.00477

1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF < 0.00091 < 0.00091 < 0.00022 < 0.00022 < 0.00001 < 0.00202 < 0.00091 < 0.00099 < 0.00197

Total HpCDF < 0.00091 < 0.00091 < 0.00022 < 0.00022 < 0.00001 < 0.00202 < 0.00091 < 0.00099 < 0.00197

1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF < 0.00130 < 0.00110 < 0.00031 < 0.00026 < 0.00002 < 0.00288 < 0.00131 < 0.00141 < 0.00282

TOTAL 1.62823 0.38613 0.02411 3.6on3 1.63646 1.76417 3.52834

899-02 4-13---------------- -.---------..-.---------------....--..._._Y"ENVIRONMENTAL...INC.SECTIONFOURKohlerCompany:Kohler,WIClayMACTICRDataGatheringTestDates:8/3-8/6/10Page:35of37TestResultsTABLE4-11.WAREDRYER#1STACKDIFEMISSIONSSUMMARY(RUN2)COMPANYKohlerCompanyLOCATION:Kohler,WisconsinSOURCEWareDryer#1TESTDATE8/5/2010TESTRUNNO.WD1-M23-2TESTTIME12:17-16:20SAMPLEVOLUME:144.938dscfPRODUCTIONRATE:2045lb/hrSAMPLEVOLUME:4.105dscm927.6kg/hrGASFLOWRATE:146,650dscfhOXYGENCONTENT:20.8%EMISSIONEMISSIONTOTALESTIMATEDDETECTIONLIMITSTACKGASEMISSIONEMISSIONRATERATESAMPLEDETECTIONSTACKGASSTACKGASCONCENTRATIONRATERATE(kg/Mgof(lb/tonofDIOXINIFURANMASSLIMITCONCENTRATIONCONCENTRATION(lb/dscf)(lb/hr)(kg/hr)Product)Product)COMPOUNDjnanosram){nanosram/dscml{nanosram/dscm)x10"12x10'9x10·9x10·9x10'92,3,7,8-TCDD<0.00480<0.00250_<0.00117<0.00061<0.00007<0.01071<0.00486<0.00524<0.01047TotaiTCDD<0.00250<0.00250<0.00061<0.00061<0.00004<0.00558<0.00253<0.00273<0.005451,2,3,7,8PeCDD<0.00570<0.00190<0.00139<0.00046<0.00009<0.01271<0.00577<0.00622<0.01243TotalPeCDD0.01670<0.001900.00407<0.000460.000250.037250.016900.018220.036431,2,3,4,7,8HxCDD<0.00190<0.00190<0.00046<0.00046<0.00003<0.00424<0.00192<0.00207<0.004141,2,3,6,7,8HxCDD<0.00840<0.00210<0.00205<0.00051<0.00013<0.01874<0.00850<0.00916<0.018331,2,3,7,8,9HxCDD<0.00970<0.00190<0.00236<0.00046<0.00015<0.02164<0.00981<0.01058<0.02116TotalHxCDD0.02370<0.002100.00577<0.000510.000360.052870.023980.025850.051701,2,3,4,6,7,8HpCDD0.07690<0.003500.01873<0.000850.001170.171540.077810.083880.16776TotalHpCDD0.14200<0.003500.03459<0.000850.002160.316750.143680.154890.309781,2,3,4,6,5,7,8OCDD0.71100<0.003600.17321<0.000880.010811.585980.719400.775541.551082,3,7,8-TCDF<0.00110<0.00110<0.00027<0.00027<0.00002<0.00245<0.00111<0.00120<0.00240TotaiTCDF<0.00110<0.00110<0.00027<0.00027<0.00002<0.00245<0.00111<0.00120<0.002401,2,3,7,8PeCDF<0.00160<0.00160<0.00039<0.00039<0.00002<0.00357<0.00162<0.00175<0.003492,3,4,7,8PeCDF<0.00150<0.00150<0.00037<0.00037<0.00002<0.00335<0.00152<0.00164<0.00327TotalPeCDF<0.00160<0.00160<0.00039<0.00039<0.00002<0.00357<0.00162<0.00175<0.003491,2,3,4,7,8HxCDF<0.00060<0.00060<0.00015<0.00015<0.00001<0.00134<0.00061<0.00065<0.001311,2,3,6,7,8HxCDF<0.00055<0.00055<0.00013<0.00013<0.00001<0.00123<0.00056<0.00060<0.001201,2,3,7,8,9HxCDF<0.00058<0.00058<0.00014<0.00014<0.00001<0.00129<0.00059<0.00063<0.001272,3,4,6,7,8HxCDF<0.00065<0.00065<0.00016<0.00016<0.00001<0.00145<0.00066<0.00071<0.00142TotalHxCDF<0.00065<0.00065<0.00016<0.00016<0.00001<0.00145<0.00066<0.00071<0.001421,2,3,4,6,7,8HpCDF<0.00170<0.00067<0.00041<0.00016<0.00003<0.00379<0.00172<0.00185<0.003711,2,3,4,7,8,9HpCDF<0.00086<0.00086<0.00021<0.00021<0.00001<0.00192<0.00087<0.00094<0.00188TotalHpCDF<0.00086<0.00086<0.00021<0.00021<0.00001<0.00192<0.00087<0.00094<0.001881,2,3,4,6,5,7,8OCDF<0.00130<0.00130<0.00032<0.00032<0.00002<0.00290<0.00132<0.00142<0.00284TOTAL0.901410.219600.013712.010720.912050.983231.96647899-024-14--------------------- -.-.-------..-....--------------------...-..ENVIRONMENrAL......INC.SECTIONFOURKohlerCompany:Kohler,WIClayMACTICRDataGatheringTestDates:8/3-8/6/10Page:36of37TestResultsTABLE4-12.WAREDRYER#1STACKDIFEMISSIONSSUMMARY(RUN3)COMPANYKohlerCompanyLOCATIONKohler,WisconsinSOURCEWareDryer#1TESTDATE8/6/2010TESTRUNNO.WD1-M23-3TESTTIME07:30-11:12SAMPLEVOLUME:148.931dscfPRODUCTIONRATE:2841lb/hrSAMPLEVOLUME:4.218dscm1289kglhrGASFLOWRATE:150,433dscfhOXYGENCONTENT:20.8%EMISSIONEMISSIONTOTALESTIMATEDDETECTIONLIMITSTACKGASEMISSIONEMISSIONRATERATESAMPLEDETECTIONSTACKGASSTACKGASCONCENTRATIONRATERATE(kg/Mgof(lb/tonofDIOXINIFURANMASSLIMITCONCENTRATIONCONCENTRATION(lb/dscf)(lb/hr)(kg/hr)Product) Product)COMPOUND(nanosraml(nanosram/dscm!x10'12x10'9x10'9x10'9x10'92,3,7,8-TCDD<0.00280<0.00280<0.00066<0.00066<0.00004<0.00624<0.00283<0.00219<0.00439TotalTCDD<0.00280<0.00280<0.00066<0.00066<0.00004<0.00624<0.00283<0.00219<0.004391,2,3,7,8PeCDD0.00731<0.001100.00173<0.000260.000110.016280.007380.005730.01146TotalPeCDD0.02880<0.001100.00683<0.000260.000430.064130.029090.022570.045151,2,3,4,7,8HxCDD0.00695<0.001800.00165<0.000430.000100.015480.007020.005450.010901,2,3,6,7,8HxCDD<0.00710<0.00200<0.00168<0.00047<0.00011<0.01581<0.00717<0.00557<0.011131,2,3,7,8,9HxCDD0.01800<0.001800.00427<0.000430.000270.040080.018180.014110.02822TotalHxCDD0.05410<0.002000.01283<0.000470.000800.120470.054650.042400.084811,2,3,4,6,7,8HpCDD0.19200<0.006800.04552<0.001610.002840.427550.193940.150490.30099TotalHpCDD0.35200<0.006800.08346<0.001610.005210.783850.355550.275910.551811,2,3,4,6,5,7,8OCDD2.17000<0.003200.51448<0.000760.032124.832232.191891.700893.401782,3,7,8-TCDF<0.00160<0.00160<0.00038<0.00038<0.00002<0.00356<0.00162<0.00125<0.00251TotalTCDF<0.00160<0.00160<0.00038<0.00038<0.00002<0.00356<0.00162<0.00125<0.002511,2,3,7,8PeCDF<0.00200<0.00200<0.00047<0.00047<0.00003<0.00445<0.00202<0.00157<0.003142,3,4,7,8PeCDF<0.00200<0.00200<0.00047<0.00047<0.00003<0.00445<0.00202<0.00157<0.00314TotalPeCDF<0.00200<0.00200<0.00047<0.00047<0.00003<0.00445<0.00202<0.00157<0.003141,2,3,4,7,8HxCDF0.00168<0.000940.00040<0.000220.000020.003740.001700.001320.002631,2,3,6,7,8HxCDF<0.00086<0.00086<0.00020<0.00020<0.00001<0.00192<0.00087<0.00067<0.001351,2,3,7,8,9HxCDF<0.00091<0.00091<0.00022<0.00022<0.00001<0.00203<0.00092<0.00071<0.001432,3,4,6,7,8HxCDF<0.00100<0.00100<0.00024<0.00024<0.00001<0.00223<0.00101<0.00078<0.00157TotalHxCDF0.00168<0.001000.00040<0.000240.000020.003740.001700.001320.002631,2,3,4,6,7,8HpCDF<0.00110<0.00110<0.00026<0.00026<0.00002<0.00245<0.00111<0.00086<0.001721,2,3,4,7,8,9HpCDF<0.00110<0.00140<0.00026<0.00033<0.00002<0.00245<0.00111<0.00086<0.00172TotalHpCDF<0.00140<0.00140<0.00033<0.00033<0.00002<0.00312<0.00141<0.00110<0.002191,2,3,4,6,5,7,8OCDF<0.00220<0.00097<0.00052<0.00023<0.00003<0.00490<0.00222<0.00172<0.00345TOTAL2.616580.620360.038735.826692.642972.050934.10186899-024-15

# ---- 

# - - 

# - - 

# --- -- -...-- 

# --- 

# - 

# - ---- 

# - 

# ----- -...--
..... 

# - "fil"'cNVIRONMI/ENTAL

.... INC. 

# SECTIONFOUR Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 Page: 37 of 37 

# Test Results

TABLE 4-13. SPRAY BOOTH EXHAUST FPM TEST RESULTS

COMPANY Kohler Company LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE Spray Booth Exhaust

- Q24

TEST RUN NO. SBE-M5-1 SBE-M5-2 SBE-M5-3 TEST DATE 8/5/2010 8/5/2010 8/5/2010 TEST TIME 07:15-08:16 08:30

- 10:11 10:30-11:31 Average

Process Parameters Glaze Spray Rate, kg/hr 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 

## % Solids Content of Glaze 72 72 72 

## 72 Process Spray Rate of Solids, kg/hr 38.3 38.3 38.3 38.3
Stack Gas Parameters Temperature, av. 

## oF 81.7 82.7 82.7 82.4 Velocity, av. ftlsec 27.355 26.460 27.402 27.072 Volume flow, acfm 9,166.9 8,866.9 9,182.4 9,072.1 Volume flow, acmm 

## 259.58 251.08 260.01 256.89 Volume flow, scfm 8,698.7 8,398.5 8,697.3 8,598.2 Volume flow, dscfm 8,418.8 8,143.3 8,479.5 8,347.2 Volume flow, dscmm 

## 238.39 230.59 240.11 236.36 Volume flow, dscfh 505,130 488,599 508,768 500,833 Moisture, av. 

## % vol 

## 3.22 3.04 2.50 2.92 C02, av. 

## % vol, db 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 02, av. 

## % vol, db 

## 20.9 20.9 20.9 20.9

Particulate Matter {PM} Sample Volume, dscf 32.848 30.340 34.442 

## % lsokinetic 102.4 97.8 106.6

Filterable PM collected, mg 12.35 12.00 11.00 11.78 Concentration gr/dscf 0.00580 0.00610 0.00493 0.00561 lb/dscf x 1 0-ti 0.8290 0.8721 0.7042 0.8018 mg/dscm 

## 13.277 13.967 11.279 12.841 Emission rate lb/hr 0.4186 0.4260 0.3582 0.4009 lblton of solids sprayed 9.9083 10.0821 8.4775 9.4893 kg/hr 

## 0.1899 0.1932 0.1625 0.1819 kg/Mg of solids sprayed 

## 4.9542 5.0411 4.2387 4.7482

899-02 

# 4-16

# --- 

# - 

# - 

# - 

# - _. 

# ___ _ = -==-= --- 

# -- 

# -

__ ._.-


# ----- Will--.....__

... ENVIRONMENTAL

.... INC. 

# APPENDIXA

899-02 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 

# Calculation Summaries

## Company : Kohler Company Location : Kohler, Wisconsin Source : Spray Booth Exhaust

- Q24

Test Run SBE-M5-1 SBE-M5-2 SBE-M5-3 Test Date 8/5/2010 8/5/2010 8/5/2010 Test Time 07:15-08:16 08:30-10:11 10:30-11:31 Average
PROCESS PARAMETERS 

## Glaze Spray Rate, kg/hr 53.2 53.2 53.2 53.2 

## % Solids Content of Glaze 72 72 72 

## 72 Process Spray Rate of Solids, kg/hr 38.3 38.3 38.3 38.3
STACK GAS 

## Temperature, av. 

## oF 81.7 82.7 82.7 82.4 Velocity, av. ftlsec 27.355 26.460 27.402 27.072 Volume flow, acfm 9,166.9 8,866.9 9,182.4 9,072.1 Volume flow, acmm 

## 259.58 251.08 260.01 256.89 Volume flow, scfm 8,699 8,399 8,697 8,598 Volume flow, dscfm 8,419 8,143 8,479 8,347 Volume flow, dscmm 

## 238.39 230.59 240.11 236.36 Volume flow, dscfh 505,130 488,599 508,768 500,833 Moisture, av. 

# % vol 

## 3.22 3.04 2.50 2.92 C0 2 , 

## av.% vol, db 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0 2 , 

## av. 

# % vol, db 

## 20.90 20.90 20.90 20.90
PARTICULATE MATTER {PM} 

## Sample Volume, dscf 32.848 30.340 34.442 

## % lsokinetic 102.4 97.8 106.6
Filterable PM collected, mg 

## 12.35 12.00 11.00 11.78 Concentration gr/dscf 0.00580 0.00610 0.00493 0.00561 lb/dscf x 1 

# o· 6 

## 0.8290 0.8721 0.7042 0.8018 mg/dscm 

## 13.277 13.967 11.279 12.841 Emission rate lb/hr 0.4186 0.4260 0.3582 0.4009 lblton of solids sprayed 9.9083 10.0821 8.4775 9.4893 kg/hr 

## 0.1899 0.1932 0.1625 0.1819 kg/Mg of solids sprayed 

## 4.9542 5.0411 4.2387 4.7482



# A-1

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust

- 024 TEST DATE: 

## 8/5/2010 RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-1



## y FACTOR: BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: AH: 

## 0.986 29.18 in. 

## Hg 

## -0.70 in.H 2 

## 0 

## 81.7 °F 0.4716 in.H 2 

## 0 

## 1.54 in.H 2 

## 0 STACKDIAM: METER VOLUME: METER TEMP: LIQUID COLL: 

## C02:

02: 32.00 inches 

## 34.833 

# te 80.5 °F 23.2 milliliters 

## 0.10 % by volume 

## 20.90% by volume

ENGLISH UNITS 

## (29.92 in.Hg & 

## 68 

## °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @ STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

Vmstd

# (~)xV x rP._+

# 1~ 

# l

29.92 m 

## Y Tm = 

## 32.848 dscf



## y= 0.986

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS

vwstd 

# = 0.04707 X 

## VIc 

# = 1.092 scf

VIc= 

## 23.2 ml

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED



## Bws 

# = Vwstd = 

## 0.0322 Vw&d 

## + Vmstd

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION

Bws@saturation 

## = S.V.P. 

## 0.0378 = 

# Ps Pbar 

## + 

## 13.6

S.V.P. 

# = 1.102 in. 

## Hg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS 

## Bws 

# = 0.0322



# A-2

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-1 SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust- Q24 TEST DATE: 8/5/201 0

BAROMETRIC: 29.18 in. Hg -0.7 in.H 2 

## 0 81.7 "F 0.4716 in.H 2 

## 0 STACKDIAM: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP:

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md 

# = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis C0 2 : 

## 02:

M 5 

## =Md(1 Bws) + 18Bw.;

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT

CP (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# .JMi = 

# -I. /tiP
n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 81.7 °F +460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

p p 

## Pstatic s = bar+-- 13.6
STACK GAS VELOCITY

Vs (85.49)(CP)(avg.JMi) /

# (Ps;~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Qs = 60 X 

## Vs xAs

Stack Area= 5.585 

# tf

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis

Qstdw (528) (Ps) 29.92 (Qs) T 5 

## STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis

Qstd

# :.:**}os{~:** }1- Bws) 32.00 inches 0.10% by volume 20.90 % by volume

= 28.85

= 28.50

= 

## 0.84

= 0.4716

= 541.7

= 29.13



# = 27.355



# = 9,167

= 8,699 521,923

= 8,419 505,130 lb/lb-mole

lbllb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

"R

in.Hg

Wsec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh



# A-3

### ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. USEPA METHOD 5**~FILTERABLE** 

### PARTICULATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust

- 024 TEST DATE: 8/5/10 RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-1

INPUT Vm: 34.833 

# te yFACTOR: 0.986 Pbar: 29.18 in.Hg AH: 1.54 in. H 2 

### 0 Tm: 80.5 OF Qs: 8,419 dscfm Ts: 81.7 OF Runtime: 60 minutes Vs: 27.355 ft/sec Ps: 29.13 in.Hg 

# v,c: 23.2 mL Noz. diam: 0.255 inches Mn front: 12.35 mg Production Rate: 84.5 lb/hr C02: 0.10 %by volume 38.3 kg/hr 02: 20.90 %by volume ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg 

### & 68 °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

[ bH 

# l

528 Pbar +-- V : (--) XV X y 13.6 

## = 32.848 dscf

mstd 29.92 m Tm



## y= 0.986 VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS Vwstd =0.04707x\/ic 

## = 1.092 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS
Bws = Vws!d Vwstd + Vmstd x100 

## = 3.22 %

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION IN STACK GAS ON A DRY BASIS
(0.01543{

# ~) Total = 0.00580 gr/dscf Cs Vmstd
C

_ (Mn)(35.315)

s,mg/dscm

- 

### (Vmstd) 

## = 13.277 mg/dscm

## c~ (2.205 x 

### 1 

# o- 6 { 

# ) C's Total = 0.8290 x**10.~;** 

### lbs/dscf

EMISSION RATE pmr = (

# 0 

# )o
51 

### d)(60) 

## = 0.4186 lbs/hr 1.8336 ton/yr

ER 

# =**pm~bthr** x 20001b lbltonotProduct PRiblhr 1 ton 

# = 9.9083 lb/ton of solids sprayed

ER

_ pmrlblhr x 1000kg = 4.9542 kg/Mg of solids sprayed kgiMgo!Product- (PR )(2 20461b/k ) 1Mg kglhr • 9 ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE

%ISO (100)(Ts{(o.002669 x

# VIc)+(~: }r{Pbar +(

# ~~))] = 102.41 %1 (60)(e)(V 5 

### )(P 5 

### )(An) An= 0.0003547 

# fr' Runtime= 60 minutes



# A-4

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust

- 024 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010 RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-2
yFACTOR: 0.986 BAROMETRIC: 29.18 in. Hg STATIC PRES: -0.70 in.H 2 0 STACK TEMP: 82.7 °F SQ.RT AP: 0.4559 in.H 2 0 AH: 1.47 in.H 2 0 STACK DIAM: 32.00 inches METER VOLUME: 32.483 

## ft 3 

## METER TEMP: 85.6 °F LIQUID COLL: 20.2 

## milliliters C0 2 : 0.10 

## % by volume

02: 20.90 

## % by volume

ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg 

## & 68 °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS



## [

# ~H 

# l

528 Pbar 

## +- V 

# =(--)X V X"( 

## 13.6 = 30.340 dscf

mstd 29.92 m Tm

y= 0.986

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS

vwstd 0.04707 

# X VIc = 0.951 scf

VIc= 20.2 ml

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED
B

_ Vwstd

ws- 

## Vws.d 

## + Vms.d 

# = 0.0304

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION

Bws@saturation S.V.P. 

## 0.0391 = R 

# + Pstatic

bar 13.6

S.V.P. 

# = 1.138 in. Hg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS Bws = 0.0304



# A-5

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-2 SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust- 024 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010

BAROMETRIC: 29.18 in. Hg -0.7 in.H 2 

## 0 82.7 Of 0.4559 in.H 2 

## 0 STACKDIAM: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP:

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis 

## C02: 02;

Ms Md (1- Bws) + 18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# Jt;P =-"' 

# JAP
n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

T

-

s- 82.7 °F 

# + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

p =R + Pstatic s bar 13

_ 6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V 5 

## = (85.49)(Cp)(avgJ!;P)

# /(Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 5 

## =60 X V 5 

## XA 5


## Stack Area= 5.585 

# tf

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis

Ostdw ( 528 ) (Ps 

# J 29.92 

## (Os) T 5 

## STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis

Ostd

# =(**~: }as{~:}1-Bws)** 

A-6 32.00 inches 0.10 

## % by volume 20.90 

## % by volume

= 28.85

= 28.52

= 0.84

= 0.4559

= 542.7

= 29.13

= 26.460

= 8,867



# = 8,399 503,911



# = 8,143 488,599 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm, wb seth, wb

dscfm dscfh

### ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. USEPA METHOD 5 ·FILTERABLE PARTICULATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust- 024 TEST DATE: 8/5/1 0 RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-2

INPUT Vm: 32.483 

# re yFACTOR: 0.986 Pbar: 29.18 in.Hg AH: 1.47 in. H 2 0 Tm: 85.6 OF Qs: 

### Ts: Runtime: Vs: Ps: 8,143 82.7 dscfm OF

VIc: 20.2 mL Noz. diam: 60 26.460 29.13 0.255 84.5 38.3 minutes ft/sec in.Hg inches lb/hr kg/hr Mn front: 12.00 mg Production Rate: C0 2 : 0.10 %by volume 02: 20.90 %by volume ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg 

## & 68 °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS 

# [p AH 

# j

- 528 bar+ 13.6 30.340 dscf Vmsld

- (--) X 

### Vm X 

### y = 29.92 Tm

y= 0.986 VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS Vwstd = 0.0470 7 X 

# \llc = 0.951 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS
B

_ Vwstd

ws - 

### Vwstd + Vmstd x100 = 3.04 %

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION IN STACK GAS ON A DRY BASIS Total = 0.00610 gr/dscf C 5 

### = (0.01543{

# ~ 

# J Vmstd
C

_ (Mn )(35.315)

s.mgtdscm

- (Vmstd) = 13.967 mg/dscm

# c~ = (2.205 x 10- 6 {

# ~ 

# J C's Total = 0.8721 x 10-ti lbs/dscf Vmstd EMISSION RATE pmr= (

# ~~

# 0 )ostd)(60) = 0.4260 lbs/hr 1.8658 ton/yr

ER

_**pm~bthr** 

### 20001b = 10.0821 lb/ton of solids sprayed lbl!onofPrO<luct**-~Xtlon** 

### lblhr

ER

_**pm~bthr** 

### 1000kg
= 5.0411 kg/Mg of solids sprayed X 

### kg/MgofProduct-**{P~** 

### )( 2 2046 lb/k ) 1Mg glhr · 9 ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE

%!SO (100)(Ts{(0.002669 x

# VIc)+(~: }r{Pbar +(

# ~ ))]

= 97.79 %1 (60)(6)(Vs)(Ps )(An) An= 0.0003547 

# tr Runtime= 60 minutes


# A-7

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust

- 024 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010 RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-3

y FACTOR: BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: AH: 0.986 29.18 in. Hg -0.70 in.H 2 

## 0 82.7 °F 0.4726 in.H 2 

## 0 1.60 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK DIAM: 32.00 inches METER VOLUME: 37.200 

# te
METER TEMP: 90.6 °F LIQUID COLL: 18.8 milliliters C0 2 : 

## 0.10% 

## by volume

0 2 : 

## 20.90 % 

## by volume

ENGLISH UNITS (29 92 in Hg 

## & °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS 

# [ AH] 528 Pbar 

## + 13.6 34.442 dscf Vmstd 

# = (--) X 

## vm X 

## y = 29.92 Tm

y= 0.986

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS

Vwst.d 

# = 0.04707 X 

## "'c = 0.885 scf

VIc= 18.8 ml

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED
B

_ Vwstd = 0.0250

ws- 

## Vwstd 

## + Vmstd

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION

Bws@saturation 

# = S.V.P. 

## 0.0391 = R 

## + Pstatic

bar 13.6

S.V.P. = 1.138 in. Hg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS Bws = 0.0250



# A-8

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-3 SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust- 024 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010

BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: 29.18 in. Hg -0.7 in.H 2 

## 0 82.7 °F 0.4726 in.H 2 

## 0

.**STACKDI~M:** 

## .C0 2 :



## 02: SQ.RT AP:

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md =0.44(%C0 2 

## )+0.32(%0 2 

## )+0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms "'Md(1-2ws)+18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICJENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0 1 n 

# -IJAP

n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 82.7 °F +460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p p Pstatic s"" bar+-- 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5

# =(85.49)(Cp)(avg~)**/(Ps~~s)** STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Os 

# = 60 X V 5 

## XA 5


## Stack Area= 5.585 

# ff

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis ( 528 ) (Ps) Ostdw = 29.92 {Os) Ts
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis

0 = ( 528 

# )co { Ps } 1 std 29.92 s T 5 

## Bws) 32.00 inches 0,10 %by volume 20.90 % by volume



# = 28.85



# =**28~58**



## = 0.84

= 0.4726

= 542.7

= 29.13

= 

## 27.402



# = 9,182



# = 8,697 521,840

= 8,479 508,768 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

"R

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh

### ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. USEPA METHOD 5- FILTERABLE PARTICULATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Spray Booth Exhaust

- 024 TEST DATE: 8/5/10 RUN NUMBER: SBE-M5-3

INPUT Vm: 37.2 fe yFACTOR: 0.986 Pbar: 29.18 in.Hg AH: 1.6 in.H 2 0 Tm: 90.6 OF Os: 8,479 dscfm Ts: 82.7 OF Runtime: 60 minutes Vs: 27.402 ft/sec Ps: 29.13 in.Hg VIc: 18.8 mL Noz. diam: 0.255 inches Mn front: 11.00 mg Production Rate: 84.5 lb/hr C0 2 : 0.10 %by volume 02: 20.90 %by volume

VOLUME OF SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

_ ( 528 ) [Pbar +

# 1~~1 Vmstd

- - x 

### Vm x 

### y ----=-==- 29.92 Tm

y 

### = 0.986 VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS Vwstd = 

### 0.04707 x 

### V 1 

### c



### FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS 

## =

=

=
PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION IN STACK GAS ON A DRY BASIS

C 5 = 

### (0.01543)

# ~ 

# ( J Total =

Vmstd {Mn){35.315) Cs,mgtdscm = 

### {V ) mstd

# c~ = 

### (2.205 x 

### 1

# o-**>(~J** Vmstd C's Total

EMISSION RATE

ER

_**pm~bthr** 

### x 

### 2000 lb lbltonofProduct

- PRib/hr 1 ton

ER

_**pm~bthr** 

### x 

### 1000kg kgtMgofProduct- (PR )(2 20461b/k ) 1Mg kg/hr · 

## 9 ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE
(100)(T 5 )[(0.002669 x 

### VIc)+ (

# ~: 

# }y {Pbar + (

# ~~) 

# J]

%ISO = ---=----:---:-:-""7"":---:-cc----:--:---:-------=- 

### (60)(8)(V5 )(P 5 

# )(An) An= 0.0003547 ftL 

### Runtime=


# A-10 =



## =

=

=



## =

=

60 38.3 kg/hr

ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg 

### & 68 °F)

34.442 dscf

0.885 scf

2.50 %

0.00493 gr/dscf

11.279 mg/dscm

0.7042 

### x 10-ti lbs/dscf

0.3582 lbs/hr 1.5688 ton/yr

8.4775 lb/ton of solids sprayed

4.2387 kg/Mg of solids sprayed

106.61 %1

minutes

## Company : Kohler Company Location : Kohler, Wisconsin Source : TK-19 Ware Exit Exhaust

Test Run TK19-WEE-1 TK19-WEE-2 TK19-WEE-3 Test Date 8/3/2010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 Test Time 07:34

- 11 :04 13:05-17:15 07:20

- 11 :33 Average
PROCESS PARAMETERS Process Rate, kg of ware/hr 749.8 749.8 794.2 764.6
STACK GAS Temperature, av. 

## oF 316.9 312.6 299.3 309.6 Velocity, av. ft/sec 40.592 40.656 40.281 40.510 Volume flow, acfm 9,505.4 9,520.4 9,432.4 9,486.0 

## Volume flow, acmm 

## 269.16 269.58 267.09 268.61 C0 2 , 

## av. % 

## vol, db 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.10 

## 0 2 , 

## av. 

## % vol, db 

## 20.60 20.60 20.60 20.60



# A-11

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-WEE-1

BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg STATIC PRES: -0.18 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK TEMP: 316.9 "F SOURCE: TK-19 Ware Exit Exhaust TEST DATE: 8/3/2010

STACKDIAM: C02:

02: 26.75 inches 0.1 0 

## % by volume 20.60 

## % by volume SQ.RT AP: 0.5808 in.H 2 

## 0 Moisture Content: 7.61 

## % by volume (avg. of Metals and D/F Runs) DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO) 

# = 28.84 lb/lb-mole

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms =Md(1 Bws)+18Bws = 28.02 lb/lb-mole

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp {from calibration curve or geometric specifications) 

# = 0.84

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 0

- 1 n 

## EP=-IJAP = 0.5808 in. H20 n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 316.9 °F + 460 = 776.9 "R

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

Ps p + Pstatic bar 

## 13.6 = 29.28 in.Hg

STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5 

### =

# (85.49)(cP)(avgEP)~·{Ps~~s) = 40.592 ft/sec

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Os 60 X 

## V 5 

## xA 5 

## = 9,505.4 acfm

Stack Area= 3.903 

# tr

A-12

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-WEE-2

BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SOURCE: TK-19 Ware Exit Exhaust TEST DATE: 8/3/2010

STACKDIAM: 

## C02:

02: 26.75 inches 0.20 % by volume 20.60 

## o/o by volume SQ.RT AP: 29.29 in. Hg -0.22 in.H 2 

## 0 312.6 

## Of 0.583 in.H 2 

## 0 Moisture Content: 8.01 % by volume (avg. of Metals and DIF Runs) DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md = 

## 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO) = 28.86 lb/lb-mole

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

M 5 

## =Md(1-Bws)+18Bws 

# = 27.99 lb/lb-mole

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications) 

# = 0.84

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0 1 n 

# -I. liP = 0.5830 in. H 2 

## 0 n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts 

# = 312.6 °F + 460 = 772.6 OR

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE



## Ps p + 

## Pstatic bar 

## 13.6 = 

## 29.27 in.Hg

STACK GAS VELOCITY



## Vs (85.49)(cP)(avgJM') 

# I

# (Ps~~s) = 40.656 ftlsec

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 5 

# = 60 X 

## V 5 

## XA 5 

## = 9,520.4 acfm

Stack Area= 3.903 

## ft 2



# A-13

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-WEE-3

BAROMETRIC: 29.23 in. Hg STATIC PRES: -0.18 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK TEMP: 299.25 °F SOURCE: TK-19 Ware Exit Exhaust TEST DATE: 8/4/2010

STACKDIAM: 

## C02:

02: 26.75 inches 0.00 % by volume 20.60 % by volume SQ.RT 8P: 0.5819 in.H 2 

## 0 Moisture Content: 7.92% by volume (avg. of Metals and D/F Runs) DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO) 

## = 28.82 lb/lb-mole

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

M 5 

## =Md(1-Bws)+18Bws = 27.97 lbllb-mole

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications) 

## = 0.84

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0 - 1 n 

# & =- 

# Ifi:P
= 0.5819 in. H 2 

## 0 n 1=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 299.3 

## OF + 460 = 759.3 OR

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE


## P static 29.22 in.Hg 

## Ps =Pbar +-- = 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5 

### = 

## (85.49)(CP)(avgfAP)

# (Ps~~s) = 40.281 ftlsec

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 5 

## = 60 X V 5 

## XA 5 

## = 9,432.4 acfm

Stack Area= 3.903 ff



# A-14

## Company : Kohler Company Location : Kohler, Wisconsin Source : TK-19 Rapid Cool Exhaust

Test Run TK19-RCE-1 TK19-RCE-2 TK19-RCE-3 Test Date 8/3/2010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 Test Time 07:34- 11 :04 13:05- 17:15 07:20

- 11:33 Average
PROCESS PARAMETERS Process Rate, kg of ware/hr 749.8 749.8 794.2 764.6 STACK GAS Temperature, av. 

## oF 293.3 293.1 281.8 289.4 Velocity, av. ftlsec 9.419 8.489 8.399 8.769 Volume flow, acfm 1,666.3 1,501.7 1,485.7 1,551.2 

## Volume flow, acmm 47.184 42.522 42.071 43.925 C0 2 , 

## av.% vol, db 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 

## 0 2 , 

## av. 

## % vol, db 20.70 20.80 20.60 20.70



# A-15

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-RCE-1

BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg STATIC PRES: -0.06 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK TEMP: 293.3 °F SOURCE: TK-19 Rapid Cool Exhaust TEST DATE: 8/3/2010

STACKDIAM: 

## C02:

02: 23.25 inches 0.10 % by volume 20.70 %by volume SQ.RT AP: 0.1369 in.H 2 

## 0 Moisture Content: 7.61 %by volume (avg. of Metals and D/F Runs) DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS



## Md =0.44(%C0 2 

## )+0.32(%0 

## 2 )+0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO) = 28.84 lb/lb-mole

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis



## M

5 

### = 

## Md (1- Bws) + 18Bws = 28.02 lb/lb-mole

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications) = 0.84

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# &
=- 

# 'L JAP = 0.1369 in. H 2 

## 0 n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts = 293.3 °F + 460 = 753.3 OR

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p p Pstatic s = 

## bar+ 13 . 6 = 29.29 in.Hg

STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5 

### = 

## (85.49)(CP )(avgfAP) /

# (Ps~~s) = 9.419 ft/sec

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 5 

### = 

## 60 X V 5 

## XA 5 

## = 1,666.3 acfm

Stack Area= 2.948 

# tt2

A-16

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-RCE-2

BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: 29.29 in. Hg -0.07 in.H 2 

## 0 293.1 °F SOURCE: TK-19 Rapid Cool Exhaust TEST DATE: 8/3/201 0

STACKDIAM: C0 2 :



## 02: 23.25 inches 0.1 0 % by volume 20.80 % by volume SQ.RT ..:1P: 0.1233 in.H 2 

## 0 Moisture Content: 8.01 % by volume (avg. of Metals and D/F Runs) DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md =0.44(%C0 2 

## )+0.32(%0 2 

## )+0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO) 

# = 28.85 lb/lb-mole

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms Md(1 Bws)+18Bws 

# = 27.98 lb/lb-mole

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications) 

# = 0.84

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# JMi 

# =-'I .J6P = 0.1233 in. H 2 

## 0 n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 293.1 °F + 460 

# = 753.1 OR

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

p p Pstatic 

# = 29.28 in.Hg s 

# = bar+-- 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V 6 

# = (85.49)(cp)(avg&) /

# (Ps~~s) = 8.489 ft/sec

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 8 

### = 

## 60 X V 5 

## XA 8 

## = 1,501.7 acfm

Stack Area= 2.948 

# tf

A-17

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-RCE-3

BAROMETRIC: 29.23 in. Hg STATIC PRES: -0.06 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK TEMP: 281.8 °F SOURCE: TK-19 Rapid Cool Exhaust TEST DATE: 8/4/2010

STACKDIAM: 

## C02:

02: 23.25 Inches 0.10 % by volume 20.60 % by volume SQ.RT AP: 0.1228 in.H 2 

## 0 Moisture Content: 7.92 % by volume (avg. of Metals and D/F Runs) DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md 

# = 0.44{%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32{%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28{%N 2 

## +%CO) 

# = 28.84 lb/lb-mole

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms Md ( 1 - Bws) + 18Bws 

# = 27.98 lbllb-mole

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications) 

# = 0.84

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# -fMi 

# =-I. fi.P = 0.1228 in. H 2 

## 0 

## n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts 

# = 281.8 

# OF + 460 

# = 741.8 OR

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p p Pstalic 29.23 in.Hg s= bar+-- 

## = 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V 5 

## =

# (85.49)(CP)(avgJh.P}~**(Ps;~s)** = 8.399 ft/sec

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 5 

# = 60 X V 5 

## XA 5 

# = 1,485.7 acfm

Stack Area= 2.948 ft 2



# A-18

### SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 

## .="'-;

**=....:~** 

# • = =::.1

COMPANY Kohler Company LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC

RUN NO TK19-M23-1 TK19-M23-2 TK19-M23-3 TEST DATE 8/3/2010 8/3/2010 8/4/2010 TEST TIME 07:34- 11:44 13:05-17:15 07:20

- 11 :33 Average
Stack Gas Parameters Temperature, °F 452.9 447.6 445.0 448.5 Velocity, av. ftlsec 27.081 27.795 26.252 27.043 Volumetric flow, acfm 11,012 11,302 10,675 10,996 Volumetric flow, accm 311.82 320.05 302.28 311.38 Volumetric flow, scfm 6,233.8 6,435.6 6,083.2 6,250.9 Volumetric flow, dscfm 5,746.0 5,930.9 5,585.4 5,754.1 Volumetric flow, dscmm 162.71 167.94 158.16 162.94 Volumetric flow, dscfh 344,763 355,854 335,123 345,247 Moisture, av. 

### % vol 7.82 7.84 8.18 7.95 Carbon Dioxide, av. 

### % vol 2.40 2.30 2.60 2.43 Oxygen, av.% vol 16.30 16.20 16.20 16.23 Sam[!le Parameters Time, min 240.0 240.0 240.0 240.0 Volume, dscf 150.955 149.664 147.661 149.427 Volume, dscm 4.275 4.239 4.182 4.232 Total Dioxins collected, nanograms 63.18 59.81 67.07 63.35 Total Furans collected, nanograms 0.23 0.29 0.41 0.31 lsokinetic Ratio, 

### % 97.2 93.4 97.9 96.2

Total Dioxins and Furans Emissions Concentration ng/dscm 

### @ 7 

### % Oxygen
2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.07280 0.06224 0.06322 0.06609 Total TCDD 1.32881 1.44433 1.87411 1.54909 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.26294 0.24142 0.33310 0.27915 Total PeCDD 2.66470 2.90960 3.80480 3.12636 1 ,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.16539 0.16118 0.12023 0.14893 1 ,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.33998 0.30352 0.33875 0.32742 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.55344 0.51842 0.53394 0.53527 Total HxCDD 5.80296 5.31682 5.48796 5.53591 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 3.42806 3.15381 3.52192 3.36793 Total HpCDD 6.44616 5.96572 6.49221 6.30136 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD (Total) 28.41400 26.09567 29.77362 28.09443 2,3,7,8-TCDF 

### < 0.02545 0.02658 0.02885 

### < 0.02696 TotaiTCDF 0.09966 0.09001 0.17680 0.12216 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.00990 0.00858 0.00983 0.00944 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 

### < 0.01555 0.01605 0.01612 

### < 0.01591 Total PeCDF 0.05817 0.08861 0.06096 0.06925 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 

### < 0.00212 0.00521 

### < 0.00580 

### < 0.00437 1 ,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 

### < 0.00431 

### < 0.00293 

### < 0.00530 

### < O.D0418 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 

### < 0.00247 

### < 0.00181 

### < 0.00559 

### < 0.00329 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 

### < 0.00113 

### < 0.00119 

### < 0.00636 

### < 0.00289 Total HxCDF 0.00157 0.00998 0.03246 0.01467 1 ,2,3,4,6, 7,8 HpCDF 

### < 0.00424 0.00345 0.00550 

### < 0.00440 1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 

### < 0.00064 

### < 0.00126 

### < 0.00665 

### < 0.00285 Total HpCDF 

### < 0.00064 0.00705 0.00941 

### < 0.00570 1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF (TotaQ 

### < 0.00580 0.00886 0.00721 

### < 0.00729 TOTAL <44.82246 < 41.93665 <47.71955 <44.82622



# A-19

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M23-1



## y FACTOR: 0.999 STACK DIAM: 35.250 inches BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg -0.070 in.H 2 

# 0 452.9 °F METER VOLUME: 160.670 

## ft 3 

## STATIC PRES: METER TEMP: 91.5 °F STACK TEMP: LIQUID COLL: SQ.RT AP: AH:

VOLUME OF SAMPLE 0.3585 in.H 2 

# 0 1.38 in.H 2 

## 0

@STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

( 528 ) 

# rpbar +

# 1~~ 

# l

Vmstd=- xVmxy**~** 

## 29.92 Tm



## y 

# = 0.999

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS 

## C02: 02:



# =

vwstd 

## 0.04707 X 

## VIc =

VIc= 

## 272.2 ml 272.2 milliliters 2.40 

## % by 

## volume 16.30 

## % by 

## volume

ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg & 68 °F)

150.955 dscf

12.812 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED

0.0782

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS @SATURATION 

# MF= [J•as1 ( 

# r'•::s)]J_ 05 =

p 

## T 

# = 506.8 OK P 

## = 743.8 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS 

## Bws 

# =



# A-20 1.0000

0.0782

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-M23-1 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010

BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg -0.07 in.H 2 

## 0 452.9 "F STACKDIAM: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: 0.3585 in.H 2 

## 0

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS C0 2 : 

## 02:

Md 

# = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms =Md(1 Bws) + 18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0 1 n

# =-I~ n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts 

# = 452.9 °F + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

Ps p 

## + Pstatic bar 

## 13.6
STACK GAS VELOCITY

Vs (85.49)(CP)(avg.J.hll) 

# I

# (Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Os 60 X V 8 

## XA 5


## Stack Area= 6.7771 

# ff

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis ( 528 ) (Ps) Qsldw == 

## 29.92 (Qs) Ts
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis (528) (PsJ Ostd 

# = 29.92 (Os) Ts (1 Bws) 35.250 inches 2.40 

## % by volume 16.30 

## % by volume



# = 29.036



# = 28.173



# = 0.84



# = 0.3585



# = 912.9



# = 29.28



# = 27.081



# = 11,011.77

= 6,233.75 374,025.0



# = 5,746.05 344,763.0 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

"R

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh



# A-21

# A-22 METHOD 23 ISOKINETIC CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M23-1

INPUT

Vm: 160.670 

# te yfACTOR: 0.999 Pbar: 29.29 AH: 1.38 Tm: 91.5 HCI in sample: 0.00

Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis:

Jsokinetic Sampling Rate in.Hg in. H 2 

## 0 Of J.l.g



## %ISO 

# (100)(Ts{(0.002669x

# VIc)+(~ 

# }r{ Fbar+(

# ~ ))] (60)(e)(V 5 

# )(Ps)( An) 344,763 dscfh 452.9 Of

240 minutes 27.081 fps

29.28 in. Hg 272.2 ml

English Units (29.92 in. Hg. 68 

## °f)



# = 150.955 dscf



# = 97.24% I

0.00076291 

## ft' Runtime (9) 

## = 240 minutes)>

I

"' c..v COMPANY: LOCATION:

SOURCE:

TEST DATE:

TEST RUN NO. :

TEST TIME: Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin

Tunnel Kiln #19- POC

8/3/2010

TK19-M23-1

07:34 - 11 :44 SAMPLE VOLUME (Vm,.,):

SAMPLE VOLUME (Vm,td):

GAS FLOW RATE (Q,.,):

OXYGEN CONTENT (%0 2 ): TOTAL

SAMPLE

DIOXIN I FURAN MASS(M.) COMPOUND (nanogram) 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.10300

TotaiTCDD 1.88000

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.37200

Total PeCDD 3.77000

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.23400

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.48100

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.78300

Total HxCDD 8.21000

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 4.85000

Total HpCDD 9.12000

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 40.20000

2,3,7,8-TCDF < 0.03600

Total TCDF 0.14100

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.01400

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF < 0.02200

Total PeCDF 0.08230

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00300

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00610

1 ,2,3, 7,8,9 HxCDF < 0.00350

2,3,4,6, 7,8 HxCDF < 0.00160

Total HxCDF 0.00222

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF < 0.00600

1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF < 0.00091

Total HpCDF < 0.00091

1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF < 0.00820

TOTAL 63.41463 picograms to nanograms tng

M ..... = M .... X 1 000 pg 150.955 dscf 4.275 dscm

344,763 dscfh

16.30 % ESTIMATED

DETECTION

LIMIT (nanogram)

< 0.00100 ADL

< 0.00100 ADL

< 0.00380 ADL

< 0.00380 ADL

< 0.00280 ADL

< 0.00310 ADL

< 0.00290 ADL

< 0.00310 ADL

< 0.00220 ADL

< 0.00220 ADL

< 0.00110 ADL

< 0.00110 BDL

< 0.00110 ADL

< 0.00230 ADL

< 0.00220 BDL

< 0.00230 ADL

< 0.00140 BDL

< 0.00130 BDL

< 0.00140 BDL

< 0.00160 BDL

< 0.00160 ADL

< 0.00071 BDL

< 0.00091 BDL

< 0.00091 BDL

< 0.00046 BDL STACK GAS CONCENTRATION

(nanogram/dscm)

(@ 7% Oxygen) 0.07280

1.32881

0.26294

2.66470

0.16539

0.33998

0.55344

5.80296

3.42806

6.44616

28.41400

< 0.02545

0.09966

0.00990

< 0.01555

0.05817

< 0.00212

< 0.00431

< 0.00247

< 0.00113

0.00157

< 0.00424

< 0.00064

< 0.00064

< 0.00580

44.82246 Correction to ng/dscm @ 7% 0 2 DIOXINS AND FURANS EMISSIONS SUMMARY

Production Rate (PR): DETECTION LIMIT

STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION

(nanogram/dscm)

(@ 7% Oxygen)

< 0.00071

< 0.00071

< 0.00269

< 0.00269

< 0.00198

< 0.00219

< 0.00205

< 0.00219

< 0.00155

< 0.00155

< 0.00078

< 0.00078

< 0.00078

< 0.00163

< 0.00155

< 0.00163

< 0.00099

< 0.00092

< 0.00099

< 0.00113

< 0.00113

< 0.00050

< 0.00064

< 0.00064

< 0.00033 STACK GAS 1653 lb/hr 749.8 kg/hr CONCENTRATION

(lb/dscf)

x10' 12 0.00150

0.02746

0.00543

0.05506

0.00342

0.00702

0.01144

0.11990

0.07083

0.13319

0.58709

< 0.00053

0.00206

0.00020

< 0.00032

0.00120

< 0.00004

< 0.00009

< 0.00005

< 0.00002

0.00003

< 0.00009

< 0.00001

< 0.00001

< 0.00012

0.92613 Concentration, lb/dscf

M •.• , lb

C **=~X** 13.9

d,ng/c:fsaJ1@7%02 vmslc:f,dSaJ'l 20.9-%02 c""'d =-v--x 2 2046 to-"
mald,dscf • X ng EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION

RATE RATE RATE RATE

(lb/hr) (kg/hr) (kg/Mg of Product) (lb/ton of Product)

x1o·• x1o·• x1o·• x1o·•

0.51861 0.23524 0.31374 0.62747

9.46586 4.29368 5.72647 11.45294

1.87303 0.84960 1.13311 2.26622

18.98206 8.61021 11.48340 22.96680

1.17820 0.53443 0.71276 1.42553

2.42185 1.09854 1.46512 2.93025

3.94243 1.78827 2.38501 4.77003

41.33759 18.75061 25.00762 50.01523

24.41989 11.07679 14.77307 29.54615

45.91947 20.82893 27.77947 55.55895

202.40818 91.81175 122.44899 244.89798

< 0.18126 < 0.08222 < 0.10966 < 0.21931

0.70994 0.32203 0.42949 0.85897

0.07049 0.03197 0.04264 0.08529

< 0.11077 < 0.05025 < 0.06701 < 0.13402

0.41438 0.18796 0.25069 0.50137

<0.01511 < 0.00685 < 0.00914 < 0.01828

< 0.03071 < 0.01393 < 0.01858 < 0.03716

< 0.01762 < 0.00799 < O.Q1066 < 0.02132

< 0.00806 < 0.00365 < 0.00487 < 0.00975

0.01118 0.00507 0.00676 0.01352

< 0.03021 < 0.01370 < 0.01828 < 0.03655

< 0.00458 < 0.00208 < 0.00277 < 0.00554

< 0.00458 < 0.00208 < 0.00277 < 0.00554

< 0.04129 < 0.01873 < 0.02498 < 0.04995

319.29453 144.83105 193.16063 386.32127

Emission Rate, lblhr Convert lblhr to kg/hr

ERibfhr = clb/dscr X Qsld.c:lscfh !kg
ER,,Ih, = ERiblhl X 2.20461b

Production Based Emission Rates

Emission Rate. lbfM!l of Product ER'''"' 1 000 kg

ERkgfMgofProduct = -PR **X~**

kgfhr Emission Rate. lb/ton of Product ERibltonofProdud = ERib/hr X 2000 lb

PR'""' 1ton

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M23-2
yFACTOR: 0.999 STACK DIAM: 35.250 inches BAROMETRIC: METER VOLUME: 163.740 

# te STATIC PRES: METER TEMP: 107.0 °F STACK TEMP: 29.29 in. Hg -0.070 in.H 2 

## 0 447.6 °F LIQUID COLL: 270.6 milliliters SQ.RT AP: 0.3689 in.H 2 

## 0 1.46 in.H 2 

## 0 C0 2 : 

## 2.30% by volume AH: 0 2 : 

## 16.20% by volume

VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS



## V = -- 

## xV xy · 

## ( 528 ) [Pbar +

# 1~~] mstd 29.92 m Tm



## y 

# = 0.999

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS =

Vwstd 

## 0.04707 X 

# "'c =

VIc= 

## 270.6 mL ENGLISH UNITS (29 92 in.Hg & 68 °F)

149.664 dscf

12.737 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED

0.0784

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION 

# [Ja361 (**r'"~~JJJ** 

# o.s

MF 

## = p 

## 1.0000

T = 

## 503.9 OK P = 

## 743.8 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS
Bws 

## = 0.0784



# A-24

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-M23-2 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010

BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg STACKDIAM: STATIC PRES: -0.07 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK TEMP: 447.6 °F SQ.RT AP: 0.3689 in.H 2 

## 0

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS C0 2 : 

## 02:

Md 

# = 0.44(%C0 2 

## )+0.32(%0 2 

## )+0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms =Md(1 B\IJS)+18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# fAP=- 

# IJAP

n**i~1** 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 447.6 OF + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

p 

## R Pstatic s 

## = bar+-- 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5 

## = (85.49)(Cp)(avg/AP)

# (Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 5 

# = 60 X V 5 

## XA 5


## Stack Area= 6.7771 

# tf

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis ( 528 ) (Ps) Osldw 

# = 29.92 (Qs) Ts
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis ( 528 ) (Ps) Qstd 

# = 29.92 (Os) Ts (1 Bws) 35.250 inches 2.30 % by volume 16.20% by volume

= 29.02

= 28.15

= 0.84

= 0.3689



# = 907.6

= 29.28

= 27.795

= 11,302.41

= 6,435.64 386,138.6

= 5,930.89 355,853.7 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H20

OR

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh



# A-25

## A-26 METHOD 231SOKINETIC CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M23-2



## Vm: yfACTOR: 163.74o 

# re 0.999 

## Pbar: AH: Tm: 

## 29.29 in. Hg 1.46 in. H 2 

## 0 107.0 °f HCI in sample: 0.00 J.Lg

Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis:

lsokinetic Sampling Rate



## %ISO 

# (100)(Ts{(0.002669 x VIc) 

# +(t- )r{Pbar 

# +(**~** 

# ))]

(60)(9)(Vs)(Ps)(An) 355,854 dscfh 447.6 Of

240 minutes 27.795 fps

29.28 in. Hg 270.6 ml

English Units (29.92 in. Hg, 68 °f)



# = 149.664 dscf



## = 93.41 %I


# A 

# =

n 

## 0.00076291 

# tr Runtime 

## (9) 

# = 60 minutes=!> 1\J **~** COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19 POC

TEST DATE: 81312010

TEST RUN NO. : TK19-M23-2

TEST TIME: 13:05-17:15 SAMPLE VOLUME (V.,.,td):

SAMPLE VOLUME (Vmatd):

GAS FLOW RATE (Q,td):

OXYGEN CONTENT (%02): TOTAL

SAMPLE

DIOXIN I FURAN MASS(Mn) COMPOUND (nanogram) 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.08920

TotaiTCDD 2.07000

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.34600

Total PeCDD 4.17000

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.23100

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.43500

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.74300

TotaiHxCDD 7.62000

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 4.52000

TotaiHpCDD 8.55000

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 37.40000

2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.03810

Total TCDF 0.12900

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.01230

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.02300

Total PeCDF 0.12700

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00746

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00420

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF < 0.00260

2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00170

TotaiHxCDF 0.01430

0.00494

< 0.00180

0.01010 picograms to nanograms 1ng

M...,. =M,._, X 1000pg 149.664 dscf 4.239 deem

355,854 dscfh

16.20% ESTIMATED STACK GAS

DETECTION CONCENTRATION

LIMIT (nanogram/dscm)

(nanogram) !!!Jl7% Oxygen)

< 0.00220 ADL 0.06224

< 0.00220 ADL 1.44433

< 0.01200 ADL 0.24142

< 0.01200 ADL 2.90960

<: 0.01500 ADL 0.16118

< 0.01700 ADL 0.30362

< 0.01600 ADL 0.51842

< 0.01700 ADL 5.31682

<0.00420 ADL 3.15381

<0.00420 ADL 5.96572

< 0.00430 ADL 26.09567

< 0.00140 ADL 0.02658

< 0.00140 ADL 0.09001

< 0.00400 ADL 0.00858

< 0.00380 ADL 0.01605

<0.00400 ADL 0.08861

< 0.00150 ADL 0.00521

<0.00140 BDL < 0.00293

< 0.00150 BDL < 0.00181

<0.00170 BDL < 0.00119

< 0.00170 ADL 0.00998

< 0.00140 ADL 0.00345

< 0.00180 BDL < 0.00126

< 0.00180 ADL 0.00705

< 0.00110 ADL Correction to ngldscm @ 7% 0 2 c11.noi<Ssm@1%0i DIOXINS AND FURANS EMISSIONS SUMMARY

Production Rate (PR): 1653 lb/hr

749.8 kg/hr

DETECTION LIMIT

STACK GAS STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION CONCENTRATION

(nanogram/dscm) (lb/dscf)

(!!jl7% Oxygen) x10' 12

< 0.00154 0.00131

< 0.00154 0.03049

<0.00837 0.00510

< 0.00837 0.06143

< 0.01047 0.00340

< 0.01186 0.00641

< 0.01116 0.01094

< 0.01186 0.11224

< 0.00293 0.06658

< 0.00293 0.12594

< 0.00300 0.55091

< 0.00098 0.00056

< 0.00098 0.00190

< 0.00279 0.00018

< 0.00265 0.00034

< 0.00279 0.00187

< 0.00105 0.00011

<0.00098 < 0.00006

< 0.00105 <: 0.00004

< 0.00119 <: 0.00003

< 0.00119 0.00021

< 0.00098 0.00007

< 0.00126 < 0.00003

<: 0.00126 0.00015 lbldscf

M.,. lb

Clbld"' = **Vm•~·"'"** X 2.2046x10-12 ng EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION

RATE RATE RATE RATE

(lb/hr) (kg/hr) (kg/Mg of Product) (lblton of Product)

x10' 9 x10' 9 x10-& x10-&

0.46757 0.21209 0-28286 0.56573

10.85060 4.92180 6.56419 13.12838

1.81368 0.82268 1.09720 2.19440

21.85846 9.91493 13.22351 26.44702

1.21086 0.54924 0.73253 1.46505

2.28020 1.03429 1.37943 2.75886

3.89468 1.76662 2.35613 4.71226

39.94280 18.11793 24.16382 48.32764

23.69310 10.74712 14.33340 28.66679

44.81771 20.32918 27.11295 54.22590

196.04470 88.92529 118.59934 237.19867

0.19971 0.09059 0.12082 0.24164

0.67620 0.30672 0.40907 0.81815

0.06447 0.02925 0.03900 0.07801

0.12056 0.05469 0.07294 0.14587

0.66571 0.30197 0.40273 0.80546

0.03910 0.01774 0.02366 0.04731

< 0.02202 < 0.00999 < 0.01332 < 0.02664

< 0.01363 < 0.00618 < 0.00624 <0.01649

< 0.00891 <0.00404 < 0.00539 < 0.01078

0.07496 0.03400 0.04535 0.09069

0.02589 0.01175 0.01567 0.03133

< 0.00944 <0.00428 < 0.00571 <: 0.01142

0.05294 0.02401 0.03203 0.06406

Emission Rate, lb/hr
ER!blhr ;::: c!bldsd X Qstd,dld'! ER,. 1 ., = ER,.,.,

Production Based Emission Rates

Emission Rate. lb/Mg of Product Emission Rate, lblton of Product

ER,.,., 1 000 kg

ER,., ..... ,p,""" = -PR X ""'i'M9

ll1j1thr ER .. 1 ,. 20001b ERib/tonofProdud = PRib/hr x 1 ton

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M23-3
yFACTOR: BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: AH: 0.999 29.23 in. Hg -0.080 in.H 2 

## 0 445.0 

## °f 0.3486 in.H 2 

## 0 1.32 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK DIAM: 35.250 inches METER VOLUME: 155.795 

# te METER TEMP: 85.5 °F LIQUID COLL: 279.6 milliliters C0 2 : 

## 2.60 

## % by volume

0 2 : 

## 16.20 

## %by volume

ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg 

## & °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS



## [ 8H 

# l

528 Pbar 

## +- V 

# =(--)xv xy 13.6 

# = 147.661 dscf

mstd 29.92 m Tm



## y= 0.999

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @ STANDARD CONDITIONS

vwstd 

# = 0.04707 X 

## VIc = 13.161 scf

VIc= 279.6 mL

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED

Bws 

# = Vwstd 

# = 0.0818 Vwstd 

## + Vmstd

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION 

# l [

8361 _( 1 893.5 

# JJ]
10 T 27.65

_ 0. 5

MF 

## = 1.0000 p 

## T= 502.4 OK P= 742.3 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS Bws= 0.0818



# A-28

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-M23-3 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010

BAROMETRIC: 29.23 in. Hg STACKDIAM: STATIC PRES: -0.08 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK TEMP: 445.0 °F SQ.RT L\P: 0.3486 in.H 2 

## 0

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS C0 2 : 

## 02:

Md 0.44(%C0 2 

## )+0.32(%0 2 

## )+0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

M 5 

## ""Md (1-Bws) +18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# ..fiP,-I.JAP

n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts 

# = 445.0 OF + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

p =P + Pstatic s bar 13

_ 6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5 

# = (85.49)(CP)(avg.J"M>)

# (Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 5 

# = 60 X 

## V 8 

## xA 5


## Stack Area= 6.7771 

# tf

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis
( 528 ) (Ps) Qsldw = 

## 29.92 (Os) Ts
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis ( 528 ) (Ps) Qsld = 

## 29

_ 92 (Os) Ts (1-Bws) 35.250 inches 2.60 % by volume 16.20 %by volume



# = 29.06



# = 28.16



# = 0.84



## = 0.3486



# = 905.0

= 29.22

= 26.252



# = 10,674.98



# = 6,083.20 364,992.0



## = 5,585.38 335,123.0 lb!lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm, wb seth, wb

dscfm dscfh



# A-29

# A-30 METHOD 23 ISOKINETIC CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M23-3



## Vm: yFACTOR: 155.795 

# te
0.999 

## Pbar: AH: 

## Tm: HCI in sample: 29.23 in. Hg 1.32 in. H 2 

## 0 85.5 °F 0.00 ll9

Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis:

lsokinetic Sampling Rate 335,123 dscfh 445.0 OF

240 minutes 26.252 fps

29.22 in. Hg 279.6 mL

English Units 

## (29.92 in. Hg, 

## 68 °F)



## = 147.661 dscf



# %ISO

0 

# (10D)(T,{(oDo2669 x

# ~,)+[¥,:}(P,., 

# +(**~** 

# J)]

0 

# (60)(8)(V 5 

# )(Ps )(An) 97.86% I

An 

# = 0.00076291 

# ff Runtime (8) 

# = 60 minutes)>

I

w **~** COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC

TEST DATE: 8/412010

TEST RUN NO. : TK19-M23-3

TEST TIME: 07:20-11:33 SAMPLE VOLUME (Vm ... J:

SAMPLE VOLUME (Vmstd):

GAS FLOW RATE (Q,.,.):

OXYGEN CONTENT (%0 2 ): TOTAL

SAMPLE

DIOXIN I FURAN MASS(M 0 ) COMPOUND (nanogram) 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.08940

TotaiTCDD 2.65000

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.47100

TotaiPeCDD 5.38000

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.17000

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.47900

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.75500

Total HxCDD 7.76000

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 4.98000

TotaiHpCDD 9.18000

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 42.10000

2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.04080

Total TCDF 0.25000

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.01390

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.02280

Total PeCDF 0.08620

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00820

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00750

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF < 0.00790

2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF < 0.00900

TotaiHxCDF 0.04590

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.00778

1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF < 0.00940

TotaiHpCDF 0.01330

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCOF 0.01020

TOTAL 67.47560 picograms to nanograms 1ng

M •. og = M .... X 1000 pg 147.661 dscf 4.182 dscm

335,123 dscfh

16.20% ESTIMATED

DETECTION

LIMIT

(nanogram)

< 0.00099 ADL

< 0.00099 ADL

< 0.00410 ADL

< 0.00410 ADL

< 0.00310 ADL

< 0.00340 ADL

< 0.00320 ADL

<0.00340 ADL

< 0.00830 ADL

< 0.00830 ADL

< 0.00300 ADL

< 0.00320 ADL

< 0.00320 ADL

< 0.00320 ADL

< 0.00310 ADL

< 0.00320 ADL

< 0.00820 BDL

< 0.00750 BDL

< 0.00790 BDL

< 0.00900 BDL

< 0.00900 ADL

< 0.00740 ADL

< 0.00940 BDL

< 0.00940 ADL

< 0.00220 ADL DIOXINS AND FURANS EMISSIONS SUMMARY

STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION Production Rate (PR): DETECTION LIMIT

STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION

(nanogram/dscm) (nanogram/dscm)

(@ 7% Oxygen) (@ 7% Oxygen)

0.06322

1.87411

0.33310

3.80480

0.12023

0.33875

0.53394

5.48796

3.52192

6.49221

29.77362

0.02885

0.17680

0.00883

0.01612

0.06096

< 0.00580

< 0.00530

< 0.00559

< 0.00636

0.03248

0.00550

< 0.00665

0.00941

0.00721

47.71955 <0.00070 <0.00070

< 0.00290

< 0.00290

< 0.00219

< 0.00240

< 0.00226

< 0.00240

< 0.00587

< 0.00587

< 0.00212

< 0.00226

< 0.00226

< 0.00226

< 0.00219

<0.00226

<0.00560

<0.00530

<0.00559

< 0.00636

<0.00636

< 0.00523

< 0.00665

< 0.00665

<0.00156 1751 lb/hr 794.2 kgihr STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION

(lb/dscf)

x10' 12 0.00133

0.03956

0.00703

0.08032

0.00254

0.00715

0.01127

0.11586

0.07435

0.13706

0.62856

0.00061

0.00373

0.00021

0.00034

0.00129

< 0.00012

< 0.00011

< 0.00012

< 0.00013

0.00069

0.00012

< 0.00014

0.00020

0.00015

1.00742

Correction to ng/dscm @ 7% 0 2 Concentration, lb/dscf

C **=~X------Ib**

C **=~X~ d,og/d:~~cm@7%02**  vm .. **~.decm** 20.9-%02 **~"'"** V..,,,,""' 2.2046x10' 12 ng EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION

RATE RATE RATE RATE

(lblhr) (kgihr) (kg/Mg of Product) (lb/ton of Product)

x10 .. x10' 9 x10 .. x10 ..

0.44731 0.20290 0.25546 0.51092

13.25913 6.01430 7.57232 15.14463

2.35662 1.06896 1.34587 2.69174

26.91853 12.21016 15.37323 30.74646

0.85059 0.38582 0.48577 0.97154

2.39665 1.08711 1.36873 2.73746

3.77760 1.71351 2.15740 4.31479

38.82672 17.61169 22.17403 44.34805

24.91715 11.30234 14.23024 28.46048

45.93161 20.83444 26.23165 52.46329

210.64497 95.54793 120.29981 240.59963

0.20414 0.09260 0.11659 0.23317

1.25086 0.56739 0.71437 1.42874

0.06955 0.03155 0.03972 0.07944

0.11408 0.05175 0.06515 0.13030

0.43130 0.19563 0.24631 0.49263

< 0.04103 < 0.01661 < 0.02343 < 0.04686

< 0.03753 < 0.01702 < 0.02143 < 0.04286

< 0.03953 < 0.01793 < 0.02257 < 0.04515

< 0.04503 < 0.02043 <0.02572 < 0.05143

0.22956 0.10417 0.13116 0.26232

0.03893 0.01766 0.02223 0.04446

< 0.04703 < 0.02133 < 0.02666 <0.05372

0.06655 0.03018 0.03800 0.07601

0.05104 0.02315 0.02915 0.05829

337.61035 153.13905 192.81003 385.62005

Emission Rate, lblhr Convert lblhr to kg/hr

ER!b/l'lt ;;:;;;: clbldsd' X a&ld,cladh ER -ER **X~**

"'"' - '""' 2.20461b

ER.,,.,. ... , .. p _ ER"''"' "20001b

**ER~'!Otl"'"'"""'-** PR,,.., 1ton

### Company : Kohler Company Location : Kohler, Wisonsin Source : Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC
Test Run TK19-M26A-1 TK19-M26A-2 TK19-M26A-3 Test Date 8/4/2010 8/4/2010 8/4/2010 Test Time 12:30-13:33 13:45- 14:47 15:05-16:06 Average
PROCESS PARAMETERS Process Rate, kg of ware/hr 794.2 794.2 794.2 794.2 STACK GAS Temperature, av. °F 455.8 452.3 450.8 453.0 Velocity, av. ft/sec 26.409 25.867 25.948 26.075 Volume flow, acfm 10,739 10,518 10,551 10,603 Volume flow, acmm 304.08 297.84 298.77 300.23 Volume flow, scfm 6,060 5,958 5,987 6,001 Volume flow, dscfm 5,543.0 5,446.9 5,500.0 5,496.6 Volume flow, dscmm 156.96 154.24 155.74 155.65 Volume flow, dscfh 332,581 326,814 330,001 329,799 Moisture, av. % vol 8.53 8.58 8.13 8.41 C0 2 , 

### av. % vol, db 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.4 0 2 , 

### av. % vol, db 16.0 16.1 15.9 16.0
SAMPLE DATA Sample Volume, dscf 39.033 38.314 38.360 % lsokinetic 102.6 102.5 101.6
HYDROGEN CHLORIDE {HCI}
Concentration ppmvdb 0.56 0.48 0.56 0.54 ppmv db @ 7% 

## 0 2 1.60 1.39 1.56 1.52 lb/dscf x 1 

# o-s 0.053 0.045 0.053 0.051 Emission rate lb/hr 0.01777 0.01482 0.01753 0.01671 lblton of Product 0.02030 0.01692 0.02003 0.01908 kg/hr 0.00806 0.00672 0.00795 0.00758 kg/Mg of Product 0.01015 0.00846 0.01001 0.00954
HYDROGEN FLUORIDE {HF}
Concentration ppmv db 16.7 17.3 17.0 17.0 ppmv db @ 7% 

## 02 47.29 50.18 47.27 48.25 lb/dscf x 1 

# o-s 0.866 0.900 0.883 0.883 Emission rate lb/hr 0.28796 0.29411 0.29145 0.29117 lb/ton of Product 0.32891 0.33594 0.33289 0.33258 kg/hr 0.13062 0.13341 0.13220 0.13208 kg/Mg of Product 0.16446 0.16797 0.16645 0.16629



# A-32

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M26A-1
yFACTOR: 0.995 BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg STATIC PRES: -0.08 in.H 2 0 STACK TEMP: 455.8 °F SQ.RT AP: 0.3485 in.H 2 

## 0 AH: 1.61 in.H 2 0 STACKDIAM: 35.3 inches METER VOLUME: 42.255 

# te
METER TEMP: 99.0 °F LIQUID COLL: 77.3 milliliters C02: 2.4 % by volume

02: 16.0% by volume

ENGLISH UNITS (29 92 in Hg 

## & 68 °F)



# . VOLUME OF SAMPLE @ STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS 

# r AH] 528 Pbar+- V 

# =(--)xv xy 13.6 = 39.033 dscf

mstd 29.92 m Tm

y= 0.995

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS

Vwst.d 

# = 0.04707 x V 1 

### c 

## = 3.639 scf

VIc= 77.3 mL

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED

Bws 

# = Vws.d 

# = 0.0853 Vws.d +Vms.d

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION

[ [ 8361 _( 1893.5 

# JJj

10 T 27.65

_ 0
_ 5

MF 

## = 1.0000 p 

## T= 508.4 OK P= 743.8 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS Bws = 0.0853



# A-33

# A-34 ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin RUN NUMBER: K19-M26A-1 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010

BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: 29.29 in. Hg -0.08 in.H 2 

## 0 455.8 °F 0.3485 in.H 2 0 STACKDJAM: C0 2 :



## 02:

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md 

# = 0.44(%C0 2 

## )+0.32(%0 2 

## )+0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

M. 

# = Md (1- Bws)+ 18(Bw.)

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 0

- 1 n 

# -1b.P = - 

# 'L FP

n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE



## Ts 

# = 455.8 

## oF + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p 

# =P + Pstatic s bar 

## 13 . 6
STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5 

# = (85.49)(CP)(avg-/b.P) /

# (Ps;~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Q 5 

# = 60 X 

## V 5 

## xA 5


## Stack Area= 6.77713 

## ft 2



## STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis

Qsldw

# (~}as{Ps) 29.92 T 5 

## STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis ( 528 ) (Ps) Qstd 

# = 29 . 92 (Qs) Ts (1-Bws) 35.3 inches 2.4 % by volume 16.0% by volume

= 29.02

= 28.08

= 0.84



# = 0.3485



# = 915.8

= 29.28

= 26.409

= 10,738.63



# = 6,059.72 363,583

= 5,543.02 332,581 lbllb-mole

lbllb-mole

in. H20

OR

in.Hg

ftlsec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh

## HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M26A-1

INPUT

Vm: 42.255 fe yFACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.29 in.Hg AH: 1.61 Tm: 99.0 OF HCI in sample: 945.9 11g 

# as: 332,581 dscfh Ts: 455.8 °F 

# e: 60 minutes Vs: 26.409 fps Ps: 29.28 in. Hg VIc: 77.3 mL % 

## 0 2 

### Stack: 16.00% Production Rate: 1,751 lb/hr

Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a 

## Dry Basis:

lsokinetic Sampling Rate 794.2 kg/hr English Units 

## (29.92 in. Hg, 

## 68 °F)



# = 39.033 dscf



# = 102.6% I 

# An= 0.00077519 

## ft' Runtime {B) 

## = 60 minutes

Total11g HCI in sample (M 0 )



### Concentration of HCI

3 

### C C . 385.26ft /lb- mole 

### 1 06

s(ppmvdb) s(lbldscf) x 

### 36.451b/lb- mole x



### C X 

### 13.9

s(wmvdb) 

## 20.9-%02

HCI Mass Rate: 

# E Os X

## c~(lbldsd)
20001b PR,b/hr 1ton ERib/tonofProduct 

# =

ER

_**pm~b/hr** 

### x 

### 1000kg kg/MgotProduct- (PR )(2 20461b/k ) 1M kg/hr · 9 9 

## = 

# =



# =

=

=



# = 945.9 11g

0.0534 X 

### 10-6 lbs/ dscf

0.56 ppmv db

1.60 ppmv db 

## @ 7% 

## 02

0.01777 lb/hr 0.00806 kg/hr

0.02030 lb/ton of product

0.01015 kg/Mg of product



# A-35

## HYDROGEN FLUORIDE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M26A-1

INPUT

Vm: 42.255 

## ft3 1FACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.29 in. Hg .!lH: 1.61 Tm: 99.0 OF HF in sample: 15,327.1 

## p.g Qs: 

### Ts: 

# e: Vs: Ps: 

## VIc: 332,581 dscfh 455.8 °F 60 minutes

%02Stack: 16.00% Production Rate: 26.409 fps 29.28 in. Hg 77.3 mL 1,751 lb/hr 794 2 kg/hr Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis:

lsokinetic Sampling Rate 

## Fe:



# (100)(Ts)[(0.002669x Vlc)+(t 

# Jr{ Fbar 

# +(



# ~~ 

# )l

**%ISO=----=------,,.--~...,..---,--,-_,....,-,_..;..** ____ _;_))__,._ 

# (60)(8)(Vs )(Ps)(An) English Units 

## (29.92 in. Hg. 68 °F)



## = 39.033 dscf



# = 102.6% I

0.00077519 

## ft' Runtime (l:l) 

## = 60 minutes

Total

**~g** 

### HF in sample (M 0 )



### Concentration of HF



## c~(lbldscf) (2,205x 1 

# o- 9 

### 1b/ 

### 119)(Mn) vmstd



# c· x 

### 385.26 ft 3 

### /lb mole x 

### 1 

# o"

•tlbld"" 1 

### 20.011b lib- mole

C X 

### 13.9

s(ppm,db) 

### 20.9-%02

HF Mass Rate:

ER 

# = pmGblhr x 2000 lb lbltono!Product PR 1 t lblhr on 

# =

ERkg/MgofProduct PmGb/hr 1000kg (PRkg/hr )(2.20461b/kg) X 

### 1Mg



# A-36 =



## =

=



# =

= 15,327.1

**~g**



### 0.8658 x 10-6 lbs/ dscf

16.67 ppmv db

47.29 ppmv db @ 

### 7% 0 2

0.28796 lbs/hr 0.13062 kg/hr

0.32891 lb/ton of product

0.16446 kg/Mg of product

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M26A-2
yFACTOR: BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RTAP: AH: 0.995 29.29 in. Hg -0.08 in.H 2 

## 0 452.3 °F 0.3419 in.H 2 

## 0 1.57 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK DIAM: 35.3 inches METER VOLUME: 41.770 

## ft 3 

## METER TEMP: 102.9 °F LIQUID COLL: 76.4 milliliters C0 2 : 

## 2.3 % by volume

0 2 : 

## 16.1 % by volume

ENGLISH UNITS 

## (29.92 in.Hg & 68 

## °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

[

# ~H 

# l

528 Pbar 

## + 136 38.314 dscf Vm&d =(--)xvm xy · = 29.92 Tm

y= 0.995

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS

Vwst.d = 0.04707 

# X "'C = 3.596 scf

VIc= 76.4 

## ml

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED
B

- Vw&d

ws- 

## Vw&d 

## + Vm&d = 0.0858

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION 

# l [

8361 ( 18935 ) 

# lj

10 T 27.65

- 0.5

MF= 

## = 1.0000 p 

## T= 506.5 OK P= 743.8 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS 

# Bws = 0.0858



# A-37

# A-38 ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin RUN NUMBER: K19-M26A-2 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010

BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RTAP: 29.29 in. Hg -0.08 in.H 2 

## 0 452.3 °F 0.3419 in.H 2 

## 0 STACKDIAM: 

## C02:

02:

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md 

# = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## +0.32(%0 2 

## )+ 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

M. Md(1 Bws) + 18(8ws)

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# FP=-IfiP
n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

T

-

s- 452.3 °F + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

Ps p + Pstatic bar 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY



# v. 

# =

# (85.49)(Cp)(avgJ6P)~(P.~(M.) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Q 5 

### = 

## 60 X V 5 

## XA 5


## Stack Area= 6.77713 

# ff

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis

Qstdw ( 528 ) (Ps) 29.92 (Qs) T 5 

## STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis ( 528 ) (Ps) Qstd 

# = 29.92 (Qs) Ts (1- Bws) 35.3 inches 2.3 % by volume 16.1 % by volume



# = 29.01



# = 28.07



# = 0.84



# = 0.3419



# = 912.3



# = 29.28

= 25.867



# = 10,518.28



# = 5,958.15 357,489



# = 5,446.90 326,814 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm, wb seth, wb

dscfm dscfh

## HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M26A-2

INPUT

Vm: 41.770 

### ft3 yFACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.29 in. Hg AH: 1.57 Tm: 102.9 OF HCI in sample: 787.8 

## J.19 %02 Stack: 16.10%

Volume of Sample at Standard Qs: 326,814 dscfh Ts; 452.3 

## OF 

## ®: 60 minutes Vs: 25.867 fps Ps: 29.28 in. Hg 

# v,c: 76.4 mL Production Rate: 1,751 lb/hr 

## Fe: 794.2 kg/hr English Units Conditions on a Dry Basis: 

## (29.92 in. Hg. 68 

## °F)



## vm!'i.d 

# (**~** 

# l

X X 

# [pO. +

# 1~~] 29.92 Vm y 

## Tm 

# = 38.314 dscf

lsokinetic Sampling Rate



## (100)(Ts{(0.002669 x

# v;c)+(~m )r{Pbar +(

# ~~ ))]**~SO=** 

## m 

# = 102.5% I 

## (60)(6)(Vs)(Ps )(An) 

# An= 0.00077519 ft" 

### Runtime (e) 

# = 60 minutes

Total J.tg HCI in sample (Mn) 

# = 787.8 

## 1-19

Concentration of HCI

. (2,205x10- 9 

### 1b/!-Lg)(Mn) cs(lb/dscf) 

# = 

# = 0.0453 x 10,..;1bs/ vmstd dscf


## Cs(ppmvdb) 

# c· 385.26ft 3 

### /lb- mole 

## s(lb/dsct) x 36.451b lib- mole X 

### 10 6 

# = 0.48 ppmvdb



## C 

# = C X 

### 13.9 s(ppmvdbl s(ppmvdb) 

### ZQ. 

### 9 _ %Q
2 

# = 1.39 ppmv db@ 7% 02

HCI Mass Rate: 

## E 

## Qs X

## C~(lb/dsd) 

# = 0.01482 lb/hr 0.00672 kg/hr
ER 

# =**pm~b/hr** x 20001b 

# = 0.01692 lb/ton of product lbltono!Product PR 1 ton lb/hr

ER

- pmGbthr x 1000kg 0.00846 kg/Mg of product llgiMgofProduct- (PR )(2 20461b/k ) 1Mg 

## = llg/hr · 9



# A-39

## HYDROGEN FLUORIDE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M26A-2

INPUT

Vm: 41.770 

## ft3 yFACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.29 in. Hg ilH: 1.57 Tm: 102.9 OF HF in sample: 15,637.3 flg Qs: 

### 326,814 dscfh Ts: 452.3 OF 

## E>: 60 

### minutes Vs: 25.867 fps Ps: 29.28 in. Hg 

# v,c: 76.4 mL. %0 2 

### Stack: 16.10% Production Rate: 1,751 lb/hr

Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis:

lsokinetic Sampling Rate Fe: 794 2 kg/hr English Units 

## (29.92 in. Hg. 

## 68 °F)



# = 38.314 dscf



## = 102.5% I 

# An= 0.00077519 

# ft' Runtime (e) 

# = 60 minutes

Total flg HF in sample (M 0 )



### Concentration of HF

C =C· x385.26ft 3 

### /lb-molex 

### 10 • •lppnwdb) •Obldsdl 

### 2Q.Q1Jb fib- mole

C X 

### 13.9

$(""""""') 

### 20.9 %02



### HF Mass Rate:**pm~bthr** 

### 20001b 

## --x-- PR1bthr 1ton ERibltonofProduct 

## =**pm~bthr** 

### 1000 kg X 

### (PRkg/hr )(2.20461b/kg) 1Mg ERkg/MgofProduct 

### =



# A-40 

# =

=

=

=



# = 15,637.3 flg

0.8999 x 

## 10..s lbs/ dscf

17.33 ppmv db

50.18 ppmv db@ 7%0 2



### 0.29411 lbs/hr 0.13341 kg/hr

0.33594 lb/ton of product

0.16797 kg/Mg of product

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M26A-3
yFACTOR: BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: AH: 0.995 29.29 in. Hg -0.08 in.H 2 

## 0 450.8 °F 0.3436 in.H 2 

## 0 1.57 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK DIAM: 35.3 inches METER VOLUME: 41.575 

## ft 3 

## METER TEMP: 99.6 °F LIQUID COLL: 72.1 milliliters C0 2 : 

## 2.4 

## % by volume

0 2 : 

## 15.9 

## % by volume

ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg 

## & °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

V, =

__ X 

### V, X 'II 

## 1 3.6 : ( 528 ) 

# [Pbar + AH 

# 1

m&d 29.92 m 1 

## Tm



## y 

# = 0.995

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS

Vw&d 0.04707 

# x "'c =

VIc= 72.1 mL

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED

B Vw&d 

# =

ws 

## Vw&d 

## + Vm&d

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION



## MF 

# JJ

&361-(

# T1B:.~ 

# ll)-05 "

p


## T 

# = 505.7 °K P 

# = 743.8 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS 

# Bws = 38.360 dscf

3.394 scf

0.0813

1.0000

0.0813



# A-41

# A-42 ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin RUN NUMBER: K19-M26A-3 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010

BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RTAP: 29.29 in. Hg -0.08 in.H 2 

## 0 450.8 "F 0.3436 in.H 2 

## 0 STACKDIAM: 

## C02:

02:

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md 

# = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms =Md(1 Bws) + 18(Bws)

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# IAP =-I 

# .[tiP
n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 450.8 

## OF + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p = 

## p + Pstatic 

# s bar 13 . 6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

v. 

# =

# (85.49)(cP)(avg~)~(P.~CM.) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Qs 

# = 60 X 

## vs xAs

Stack Area= 6.77713 

# te

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis
( 528 ) (Ps 

# J Ostdw = 

## 29 . 92 (Qs) Ts
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis

Qstd

# :.:**)os{~:** }1-Bws) 35.3 inches 2.4% by volume 15.9% by volume

= 29.02

= 28.12



# = 0.84



# = 0.3436

= 910.8

= 29.28



# = 25.948



# = 10,551.14

= 5,986.61 359,196



# = 5,500.01 330,001 lb/lb-mole

lbllb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh

## HYDROGEN CHLORIDE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M26A-3

INPUT

Vm: 41.575 

## ft3 yFACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.29 in. Hg .<iH: 1.57 Tm: 99.6 OF HCI in sample: 924.3 j.lg % 

### 0 2 

### Stack: 15.90% Os: 330,001 dscfh Ts: 450.8 OF 

# e: 60 minutes Vs: 25.948 fps Ps: 29.28 in. Hg VIc: 72.1 mL Production Rate: 1,751 lb/hr 794 2 kg/hr Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis: English Units 

## (29.92 in. Hg, 

## 68 °Fl

V

# =(~Jxv X 

### rpbar

# +~1

mstd 

### 29.92 m 

## Y Tm 

# =

lsokinetic Sampling Rate



# =

0.00077519 

# tr Runtime (9) 

# =

Total!lg HCI in sample (Mn) 

# =

Concentration of HCI

. (2,205x10- 9 

### 1biJ.l9)(Mn) cs(lb/dscf) = 

# v
mstd 

# =

3 

### C _ 

## c' X 

### 385.26ft fib- mole X 

### 1 0 6

s(ppmvdb)

- s(Jb/dscf) 

### 36.451b /lb- mole 

# =

C 

## = C X 

### 13.9

s(ppmvdb) s(ppmvdb) 

### 20 . 9 _ %Q

2 

# =

HCI Mass Rate: 

# E = 

### Qs X

## c~(lb/dsd) 

# =

ER

_**pm~bthr** 

### x 20001b lbltono!Product

- PR 1 t tbthr on 

### =

ER =

### pm~blhr x 

### 1000kg kgtMgotProduct (PR ) (2 20461b 

### I k ) 1 Mg kglhr · 9 

### = 38.360 dscf

101.6% I

60 minutes

924.3 j.lg

0.0531 x 10..s lbs/ dscf

0.56 ppmvdb

1.56 ppmv db @ 7% 

## 0 2



### 0.01753 lb/hr 0.00795 kg/hr

0.02003 lb/ton of product

0.01001 kg/Mg of product



# A-43

## HYDROGEN FLUORIDE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisonsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NO: TK19-M26A-3

INPUT

Vm: 41.575 

# te yFACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.29 in. Hg AH: 1.57 Tm: 99.6 

## Of HF in sample: 15,364.4 J,lg %0 2 Stack: 15.90%

Volume of Sample at Standard Qs: 330,001 dscfh Ts: 450.8 

## Of 

# e: 60 minutes Vs: 25.948 fps Ps: 29.28 in. Hg VIc: 72.1 mL Production Rate: 1,751 lb/hr Fe: 794 2 kg/hr English Units Conditions on a Dry Basis: 

## (29.92 in. Hg, 68 °F)

# =[~ 

# Jxv x [Poo, +

# 1~~] Vmmd 29.92 m y 

## Tm 

# = 38.360 dscf

lsokinetic Sampling Rate



## %ISO 

## (100)(Ts{(0.002669 x 

# v;c)+(i: )r{Pbar 

# +(**~~** ))]


# = 101.6% I 

## (60)(8XVs)(PsXAn) 

# An= 0.00077519 

## ft' Runtime (0) 

# = 60 minutes

Total J.lg HF in sample (Mn) 

# = 15,364.4 J.lQ



### Concentration of HF , ( 2,205 X 

### 10- 9 

### lb/ 

### J.l9)(Mn) cs(lb/dscf) = 

# = 0.8832 X 

## 10-61bs/ vmstd dscf

c 

### = c· X 

### 385.26ft 3 

### I lb -mole X 

### 10" 

# = 17.00 ppmv db

•lppmvdo) ' 1 '•'dod) 

### 20.011b I lb- mole

13.9 

### ppmv db 

## @ 7% 02 cs(ppmvdb) 

### = 

### C,(ppmvdb) X 

### 20.9 

# = 47.27 %02



### HF Mass Rate: 

## E 

## Qs X

## C~(lb/dsd) 

# = 0.29145 lbs/hr 0.13220 kg/hr
ER

_**pm~blhr** 

### 20001b lbltono!Product

- --x 

### 1ton 

# = 0.33289 lb/ton of product PRibtnr

ER

_**pm~blhr** 

### x 1000kg 0.16645 kg/Mg of product kgiMgorProduct

- (PR )(2 20461b/k ) 1M 

# = kglhr · 9 9



# A-44

## .=.=::.: 

# a:.a::a 0·'-=



# -

...

**~** SUMMARY OF TEST RES!,IL TS
Company Kohler Company Location Kohler. Wisconsin Source Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC

Test Run TK19-M29-1 TK19-M29-2 TK19-M29-3 Test Date 81312010 8/312010 8/4/2010 Test Time 07:34- 11:04 13:05-17:15 07:20- 11:33 Average

Proce5s Parameters Process Rate. kg of warelhr 749.8 749.8 794.2 764.6
Stack.Gas.Parameters Temperature, av. •F 448.7 447.0 445.3 447.0 Velocity, av. ftlsec 26.830 27.577 26.300 26.902 Volume flow, acfm 10,910 11,214 10,694 10,939 Volume now, acmm 308.93 317.53 302.82 309.76 Volume flow, scfm 6,204.5 6,389.3 6,092.1 6.228.6 Volume flow, dsctm 5,746.1 5,877.4 5,605.4 5,743.0 Volume flow, dscmm 162.7 166.4 158.7 162.62 Volume flow, dscfh 344,766 352,646 336,322 344,578 Moisture, av.% vol 7.39 8.01 7.99 7.80 C0 2 , av.% VOl, db 2.40 2.30 2.60 2.43 0 2 , av. % vol, db 16.30 16.20 16.20 16.23

Metals Sample Time. min 240.0 240.0 240.0 240.0 Volume, dscf 159.950 164.640 156.177 160.256 Volume. dscm 4.530 4.663 4.423 4.538 lsokinetic Ratio, % 101.4 102.0 101.5 101.6 Antimony ISbl Concentration

lb/dsct x 1 

## o·" < 0.00413 < 0.00790 0.07229 < 0.02811 119fdscm @ 7% 

## a. < 0.200 < 0.374 < 3.425 < 1.333 Emission rate

lblhr x 10"' < 0.01426 < 0.02786 < 0.24312 < 0.09508 lbfton of product x 1 

## o"' <0.01725 <0.03371 0.27769 <0.10955 kg/hr x 10"' <0.00647 <0.01264 0.11028 <0.04313 kg/Mg of product x 10

.. <0.00862 <0.01685 0.13885 <0.05478

Arsenic CAs! Concentration

lb/dscf X 10-S 0.20695 0.39234 0.48641 0.36323 119fdscm @ 7% 0 2 10.114 18.587 23.138 17.280 Emission rate

lblhrx 10"' 0.72039 1.36357 1.64265 1.24667 lb/ton of product X 1 O"' 0.87162 1.67401 1.87624 1.47395 kg/hr x 10

.. 0.32677 0.62758 0.74510 0.56648 kg/Mg of product x 10"' 0.43581 0.83700 0.93812 0.73698
Beryllium IBe) Concentration

lbldscf x 1 

## o-s < 0.00413 < 0.00402 <0.00423 < 0.00413 119/dscm @ 7% 0 2 < 0.200 < 0.190 < 0.201 < 0.197 Emission rate

lblhrx 10"' < 0.01426 < 0.01417 <0.01424 < 0.01422 lb/ton of product x 10"' <0.01725 <0.01714 <0.01627 <O.D1669 kg/hrx 10"' <0.00647 <0.00643 <0.00646 <0.00645 kg/Mg of product x 1 0

.. <0.00862 <0.00857 <0.00813 <0.00844

Cadmium !Cdl Concentration

lb/dsct x 1 

## o·• < 0.00207 < 0.00201 < 0.00355 < 0.00254 I'Q/dscm @ 7% 

## a. < 0.100 < 0.095 < 0.168 < 0.121 Emission rate

lblhrx 10"' <0.00713 < 0.00708 < 0.01193 < 0.00871 lb/ton of product x 10"' <0.00862 <0.00857 <0.01363 <0.01027 kglhr x 10

.. <0.00323 <0.00321 <0.00541 <0.00395 kg/Mg of product x 1 0

.. <0.00431 <0.00429 <0.00661 <0.00514

Chromium (Crl Concentration

lbtdsct x 1 

## o·• 0.18133 0.24209 0.39890 0.27411 119/dscm @ 7% 0 2 8.777 11.469 18.898 13.048 Emission rate

lblhrx 10"' 0.82516 0.85370 1.34160 0.94016 lbfton of product X 1 O"' 0.75640 1.03291 1.53239 1.10723 kg/hrx 10

.. 0.28357 0.38724 0.60855 0.42645 kg/Mg of product x 10"' 0.37820 0.51646 0.76619 0.55362



# A-45LeadfPbl Concentration

lbldscf x 1 o_, 0.57271 0.72381 0.64593 0.64748 l'!lldscm @ 7% 

### 0:! 27.722 34.290 30.601 30.871 Emission rate

lblhrx 10 4 1.97452 2.55247 2.17242 2.23314 lblton of product x 10 4 2.38901 3.08829 2.48135 2.65288 kglhrx 10

.. 0.89564 1.15779 0.98540 1.01294 kg/Mg of product x 1 0

.. 1.19451 1.54414 1.24068 1.32644
Mercury IHgl Concentration

lbldscf x 1 0 41 0.32061 0.35313 0.36879 0.34751 pg/dscm @ 7% 

### 0:! 15.519 16.730 17.471 16.573 Emission rate

lblhrx 10

.. 1.10537 1.24531 1.24033 1.19700 ib/lon Of product X 1 0"' 1.33741 1.50673 1.41671 1.42028 kg/hrx 10

.. 0.50139 0.56497 0.56261 0.54296 kg/Mg of product x 1 0

... 0.66870 0.75337 0.70835 0.71014
Manganese (Mn> Concentration

lb/dscf x 10·• 0.01154 0.02085 0.01995 0.01744 pg/dscm @ 7% 0 2 0.558 0.988 0.945 0.830 Emission rate

lblhrx 10-< 0.03977 0.07352 0.06708 0.06013 lb/ton Of prOdUCt X 10 4 0.04812 0.08896 0.07662 0.07123 kg/hr x 10-< 0.01804 0.03335 0.03043 0.02727 kg/Mg of product x 1 0__. 0.02406 0.04448 0.03831 0.03562

Nickel IN!) Concentration

Ibid sci x 1 

## o"' 0.10664 <0.03482 0,05505 < 0.06550 pg/dscm @ 7% 

### 0:! 5.162 1.649 2.608 3.140 Emission rate

lblhr x 10 4 0.36766 <0.12277 0.18515 < 0.22519 lb/ton Of product X 1 0-< 0.44483 <0.14855 0.21148 <0.26629 kg/hr x 10

.. 0.16677 <0.05569 0.08399 <0.10215 kg/Mg of product x 1 0

.. 0.22242 <0.07427 0.10574 <0.13414

Selenium !Sel Concentration

lb/dscf x 10

.. 0.26643 0.54561 0.55335 0.45813 l'!lidscm @ 7% 

### 0:1 12.896 25.990 26.215 21.700 Emission rate

lblhr x 10__. 0.91855 1.93463 1.66103 1.57140 lbllon of product x 1 

## o"' 1.11137 2.34075 2.12588 1.85927 kglhrx 10

... 0.41665 0.87754 0.84416 0.71278 kg/Mg of product x 10.,. 0.55568 1.17038 1.06284 0.92963

Cobalt!Col Concentration

lbldscf x 1 

## o"' 0.00648 0.00558 0.00819 0.00674 pg/dscm @ 7% 0 2 0.314 0.263 0.388 0.322 Emission rate

lb/hrx 10-< 0.02233 0.01960 0.02754 0.02316 lbllon of productx 10"' 0.02702 0.02371 0.03145 0.02739 kglhr x 10 4 0.01013 0.00889 0.01249 0.01050 kg/Mg of productx 10.,. 0.01351 0.01186 0.01573 0.01370

FilterablePM collected, mg 18.21 18.52 16.31 11.78 Concentration

grldscf 0.00176 0.00174 0.00161 0.00170 lbldscf x 1 o"' 0.25103 0.24804 0.23027 0.24311 mgldscm@ 7%

**~** 12.149 11.748 10.907 11.602 Emission rate

lb/hr 0.08652 0.08744 0.07742 0.08379 lblton of product 0.10466 0.10580 0.08843 0.09964 kglhr 0.03925 0.03966 0.03512 0.03801 kg/Mg of product 0.05234 0.05290 0.04422 0.04982



# A-46

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-1

y 

## FACTOR: BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: AH: 0.995 29.29 in. Hg -0.07 in.H 2 

## 0 448.7 °F 0.3563 in.H 2 

## 0 1.69 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK DIAM: METER VOLUME: METER TEMP: LIQUID COLL: 

## C02:

02: 35.25 inches 171.415 

# te 93.5 °F 271.1 milliliters

2.40 % by volume 16.30% by volume

ENGLISH UNITS (29 92 

## in Hg 

## & 68 

## °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

528 Pbar 

## + 136 

## V 

# = -- xV x · 

# r LlH 

# 1
mstd (29.92) m y 

## Tm

y 

# = 0.995

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS 

# =

Vwstd = 

## 0.04707 

# X "'C :

VIc 

# = 271.1 ml

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED



# =

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION

[ [ 8.361- (

# 1~93.5 

# )J]

10 T 27.65

_ 0

_ 5



# MF= 

# = p 

## T 

# = 504.5 OK P 

# = 743.8 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS

Bws 

# = 159.950 dscf

12.761 scf

0.0739

1.0000

0.0739



# A-47

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-1 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010

BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg -0.07 in.H 2 

## 0 448.7 °F STACK DIAM: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RTAP: 0.3563 in.H 2 

## 0

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS 

## C02: 02:

Md = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis



## Ms =Md(1-Bws)+18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0 1 n 

## =-IFP

n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts = 448.7 

## OF + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p =P + Pstatic s bar 13 . 6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5 

## =(85.49)(cp)(avg.JliP)

# /(Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Qs 

# = 60 X 

## Vs xAs

Stack Area= 6.7771 ft 2



## STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis

# Os~w**=( ~:** **}as{~:J** STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis

0 

# ==( 528 }a {Ps } 1

std 29.92 8 

## T 5 

## Bws)



# A-48 35.25 inches 2.40 % by volume 16.30% by volume



# = 29.04

= 28.22

= 0.84

= 0.3563

= 

## 908.7

= 29.28

= 26.830

= 10,910

= 6,204.5 372,271

= 5,746.1 344,766 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ftlsec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh

### ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. USEPA METHOD 5 -FILTERABLE PARTICULATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/1 0 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-1

INPUT Vm: 171.415 

# fe yFACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.29 in.Hg**~H:** 

### 1.69 in.H 2 0 Tm: 93.5 OF Qs: 5,746.1 dscfm Ts: 448.7 OF Runtime: 240.0 minutes Vs: 26.830 ft/sec Ps: 29.28 in.Hg Vac: 271.1 mL Noz. diam: 0.377 inches Mn front: 18.21 mg Production Rate: 1,653 lb/hr C0 2 : 2.40 %by volume 749.8 kg/hr 02: 16.30 %by volume ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg & 68 °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS



### [ AH 

# l

528 Pbar + 136 Vmstd =(--) xVm x 

### y · = 159.950 dscf 29.92 Tm



### y= 0.995 VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS vwstd = 0.04707 X 

### VIC = 12.761 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS
Bws = Vwst.d x 100 Vwst.d + Vmst.d = 7.39 %

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION IN STACK GAS ON A DRY BASIS

C 5 

### = (0.01543{

# ~) Filterable = 0.00176 gr/dscf
Vmstd

C

_ (Mn){35.315) ( 13.9 )

s,mg/dscm@7%0,

- {Vmstd) X 

### 20.9-%02 = 12.149 mg/dscm @ 7% 0 2

# c~ = (2.205 x 10- 6 {

# ~) C's Filterable = 0.25103 X 

### 1**0-~** 

### lbs/dscf Vmstd EMISSION RATE pmr = (

# ~~

# 0 )astd)(60) = 0.08652 lb/hr 0.03925 kg/hr

ER = pmr 1 

### b/hr x 20001b lb/tonofProduct PRib/hr 1ton = 0.10468 lb/ton of product

ER = pmrlb/hr x 1000kg = 0.05234 kg/Mg of product kg/MgofProduct (PR ) ( 2 20461b f 

### k ) 1M kg/hr · 9 9 ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE
(100)(Ts{(0.002669 x

# VIc)+(~: }r{Pbar +

# c~~) 

# JJ

= 101.40 %1 %ISO= (60)(8)(V 5 

### )(Ps )(An) An= 0.0007752 ftL 

### Runtime= 240 minutes


# A-49

# -- Metals Laboratory Data Summary 

# ---- 

# -
----- 

# ----- 

# --- 

# ---**-~-** 

# .. 

# -----**~--** 

# .... 

# - Yl!lflhlrOI#IIIO(TAL

....... 

### Client: Kohler Company Location: Kohler, Wisconsin Source: Tunnel Kiln #19 POC Date: 8/3/2010 Run#: TK19-M29-1 Front Half Metal Calculation

I Value II Values Detection FHSample FH Blank**~Value** 5%ofFH Lesser value Greater Value Blank Value Blank Corrected

Limit (Mill)**(Mt~~b)** (4 inch filter) Sample**(~b)** vs5% /vs/1 Used Sample Mass Metal !micrograms! (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms} Antimony 0.2 2.2300 2.0500 17.590 0.112 0.112 17.590 2.050 0.1800 Arsenic 1 8.2700 1.0000 17.590 0.414 0.414 17.590 1.000 7.2700
Beryllium 0.2 0.2000 0.2000 17.590 0.010 0.010 17.590 0.200 0.0000 Cadmium 0.1 0.4750 0.3300 17.590 0.024 0.024 17.590 0.330 0.1450 Chromium 1 16.7000 3.8800 17.590 0.835 0.835 17.590 3.880 12.8200 Lead 0.5 42.7000 1.3600 17.590 2.135 2.135 17.590 1.360 41.3400 Manganese 0.5 3.0000 2.5300 17.590 0.150 0.150 17.590 2.530 0.4700 Nickel 0.2 10.1000 2.2900 17.590 0.505 0.505 17.590 2.290 7.8100 Selenium 2 9.6300 2.0000 17.590 0.482 0.482 17.590 2.000 7.6300 Cobalt 0.2 0.5070 0.2000 17.590 0.025 0.025 17.590 0.200 0.3070



### Back Half Metal Calculation

I Value II Values. Detection BHSample BH Blank 5%ofBH lesser value Greater Value Blank Value Blank Corrected

limit (Mbh) (Mbhb) Sample (Mbh)vs 5% lvsll Used Sample Mass Metal (micrograms) (micrograms) !micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) !micrograms) (micrograms} !micrograms} Antimony 0.1 0.1290 0.1290 1.000 0.006 0.006 1.000 0.129 0.0000 Arsenic 0.2 8.0900 0.2000 1.000 0.405 0.405 1.000 0.200 7.8900
Beryllium 0.1 0.1000 0.1000 1.000 0.005 0.005 1.000 0.100 0.0000 Cadmium 0.05 0.0523 0.5930 1.000 0.003 0.003 1.000 0.593 -0.5407 Chromium 0.15 0.8770 0.5410 1.000 0.044 0.044 1.000 0.541 0.3360 lead 0.05 0.4460 0.2340 1.000 0.022 0.022 1.000 0.234 0.2120 Manganese 0.15 1.1300 0.7630 1.000 0.057 0.057 1.000 0.763 0.3670 Nickel 0.1 0.9270 1.3800 1.000 0.046 0.046 1.000 1.000 -0.0730 Selenium 1 12.7000 1.0000 1.000 0.635 0.635 1.000 1.000 11.7000 Cobalt 0.1 0.2630 0.1000 1.000 0.013 0.013 1.000 0.100 0.1630

FHSample FH Blank BH Sample BH Blank Total Metal**(M~~t}** (Mftlb} (Mbh} (Mbhb) (MJ Metal !micrograms} (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) Antimony 2.230 2.050 0.129 0.129 0.300 BDL Arsenic 8.270 1.000 8.090 0.200 15.160 ADL
Beryllium 0.200 0.200 0.100 0.100 0.300 BDL Cadmium 0.475 0.330 0.052 0.593 0.150 BDL Chromium 16.700 3.880 0.877 0.541 13.156 ADL lead 42.700 1.360 0.446 0.234 41.552 ADL Manganese 3.000 2.530 1.130 0.763 0.837 ADL Nickel 10.100 2.290 0.927 1.000 7.737 ADL Selenium 9.630 2.000 12.700 1.000 19.330 ADL Cobalt 0.507 0.200 0.263 0.100 0.470 ADL



### Mt =(Mfh -Mfhb)+(Mbh -Mbhb)



# A-50:rCJ1

..... ---- ------ --- ----- ----- Mercury Laboratory Data Summary

--- 1:1!!'-! rEN111110NJ/16NrAl..., IIYC. Client: Location: Source: Date: Run#: Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin Tunnel Kiln #19 - POC 8/3/2010 TK19-M29-1 Detection Limit Sample Sample
{Hgfh) {Hgbh)

Metal Fraction {micrograms) {micrograms) {micrograms)

Mercury 1B (Hgfh) 0.015 0.101

2B (Hgbh2) 0.005 0.586

3A (Hgbh3A) 0.005 0.00746

3B (Hgbh3e) 0.025 18.7

3C (Hgbh3cl 0.025 4.11 0.1010 23.4035

Hgt = (Hgfh - Hgfhb) + + + Sample Volume (Vmstd):
Stack Oxygen (%02): Mercury Calculation Front-half Back-half

Blank Blank
(Hgfhb) (Hgbhb2,3A,3B,3cl (micrograms) (micrograms)

0.015 0.13 0.005 0.068 0.025

0.015 0.228 Total (Hgtl =

+ + 159.950 dscf 16.3%
Blank Corrected Concentration

Sample Mass (Cs) (micrograms) **(j.~g/dscm)**

0.086 0.0190

0.456 0.1007
0.00246 0.0005

18.632 4.1137

4.085 0.9019 5.136

23.261 **~g**

+ + Concentration (C,.) **(~g/dscm** @ 7% 0 2 )

0.0574 0.0670 0.0004 2.7359 0.5998 3.460

# ---- 

# ---- 

# ------ 

# ----- USEPA Method 29



# ----- 

# uii'i Metals Emissions Calculation Summary

l/I!"ENVfllQMIIIENTALYINC.
Client: Location: Source: Date: Run#: Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin Tunnel Kiln #19 POC 813/2010 TK19-M29-1


### Test 

### Data Input Metals Laboratory Analysis Weights (M 

## tJ
Barometric pressure (P

.. ,): Stack pressure (P,): Test length (&): 29.29 Inches Hg 29.28 Inches Hg Abs. 240.0 minutes Antimony (Sb): Arsenic (As): Beryllium (Be): Sample nozzle diameter (0,): Sample nozzle area (A,.): Stack temperature (T,): Volume metered (Vm,..,): Stack gas velocity (V,): Stack gas volumetric flow (Q,,.): Fractional Moisture content (B.,.): 0.3770 inches 0.000775 

### tt' 448.7 "F 159.950 dsc1 26.830 ft/sec 344,786 dscfh 0.0739 Cadmium (Cd): Chromium (Cr): Lead (Pb):


### Production Data

Process Rate (PR): Stack Oxygen Content (%0 2 ): 16.3%

Mefil/sconcellfration ( pgtdscm):



# = < 0.066236 J.lg/dscm 

# = 3.347139 J.lg/dscm 

# = < 0.066236 J.lg/dscm 

# = < 0.033118 f.19ldscm 

# = 2.904681 f.lg/dscm 

# = 9.174165 J.lg/dscm

Metals concentration(pgldscm @ 7% 0 2 ):



# = < 0.200149 

# = 10.114182 

# = < 0.200149 

# = < 0.100074 

# = 8.777189 27.721933 Metals concentr.ltion ( x10

.. lbldscf}:



# = < 0.004135 x 10" 9 

### lb/dscf



## = 0.208951 x 1 0" 9 

### lb/dscf 

# = < 0.004135 x 10" 9 

### 1b/dscf



## = < 0.002067 x**10·~** 

### lb/dscf



## = 0.181330 x 1 0_, lb/dscf 

# = 0.572713 x 1 

# o·• lb/dscf Metals emission rate ( x10 4 

### ibll!r)i



# = < 0.014256 x1 O

... lb/hr 

# = 0.720391 x10

... 1b/hr 

# = < 0.014256 x10

... 1b/hr



## = < 0.007128 x1 O

... lb/hr 0.625163 x1 O

... lb/hr 

# = 1.97 4518 x1 O

... lb/hr

Metals emission rate ( x10

.. kglhr):



# = < 0.006466 x1 0

... kg/hr 

# = 0.326767 x10

... kg/hr 

# = < 0.006466 x1 0

... kg/hr 

# = < 0.003233 x1 0

... kg/hr 

# = 0.283572 x10

... kg/hr 

# = 0.895635 x10

... kg/hr



# A-52

ARI Environmental, Inc. 

### C- Mt

•- [(

# 35.315~;~ /dscm)] Antimony (Sb) 

### = Arsenic (As) 

## = Beryllium (Be) 

## = Cadmium (Cd) 

## = Chromium (Cr) 

## = Lead (Pb)
C X 

### 13.9 s.,g/dscm 

### 20.9-%0 2 

### Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Lead (Pb) 

## = =
= 

## = =

( 2.2046x10- 9 

### lb xM,J 

# c'.= ).lg
Vmstd 

### Antimony (Sb) 

# = Arsenic (As) 

## = Beryllium (Be) 

# = Cadmium (Cd) 

## = Chromium (Cr) 

# = Lead (Pb)

Em,lbth• = 

### C', x Ostd 

### Antimony (Sb) 

# = Arsenic (As) 

# = Beryllium (Be) 

# = Cadmium (Cd) 

## = Chromium (Cr) 

# = Lead (Pb)

Em.kg/hr E X 

### 1kg

m 

### 2.20461b Antimony (Sb) 

# = Arsenic 

### (As) 

# = Beryllium (Be) 

# = Cadmium (Cd) 

## = Chromium (Cr) 

# = Lead (Pb)

Method 29 Mutti-Metals Calc Summary < 0.30 11g 15.16 J1Q <0.30 11g <0.15J.IQ 13.16 11g 41.55 119

1,653 lb/hrofware 749.8 k9/hr of ware



### 0.184799 f.lg/dscm 5.135841 J.lg/dscm 1.708233 f.lgldscm 4.267824 f.lg/dscm 0.1 03770 f.lg/dscm

0.558415 15.519172 5.161836 12.896249

0.313566 Manganese (Mn): Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni): Selenium (Se): Cobalt(Co)



### Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Cobalt (Co)

Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Cobalt(Co)

0.011536 x 10...,1b/dscf Manganese (Mn) 0.320614 x 10" 9 

### 1b/dscf Mercury (Hg) 0.106639 x 10" 9 

### lb/dscf Nickel (Nil 0.266426 x 10..., lb/dscf Selenium (Se) 0.006478 x 10_, lb/dscf Cobalt (Co)

0.039774 x1 O

... lb/hr Manganese (Mn) 1.105366 x10

... 1b/hr Mercury (Hg) 0.367656 x1 O

... lb/hr Nickel (Ni) 0.918546 x1 O

... lb/hr Selenium (Se) 0.022334 x1 O

... lb/hr Cobalt(Co)

0.018041 x10

... kg/hr Manganese (Mn) 0.501391 x10

... kg/hr Mercury (Hg) 0.166768 x1 0

... kglhr Nickel (Ni) 0.416650 x10

... kg/hr Selenium (Se) 0.010131 x10

... kg/hr Cobalt(Co) 0.84 J1Q 23.26 11g 7.74119 19.33119 0.47 119Metals emission rate, Production Based ( x10"" lblton of P/'tlduct): 

### Ryn N,o •. TK19·1t.f29·1 continllfKl

ER!b/tonofProduct 

### 20001b x-- 1ton


## = < 0.017248 x10...,1blton Antimony (Sb) 

# = 0.048123 x1 O...,lb/ton Manganese (Mn) 0.871617 x10...,1b/ton Arsenic (As) 

# = 1.337 406 x1 O...,lb/ton Mercury (Hg) 

# = < 0.017248 x1 O""'lb/ton Beryllium (Be) 

# = 0.444835 x1 O...,lb/ton Nickel (Ni)



## = < 0.008624 x1 O...,lb/ton Cadmium (Cd) 

# = 1.111369 x10""'1b/ton Selenium (Se) 

# = 0.756398 x10...,1blton Chromium (Cr) 0.027022 x1 O""'lb/ton Cobalt(Co)



## = 2.389011 x1 O...,lb/ton Lead (Pb)

Metals emission rate ( x10"" /fgH,Jg ofprodqct):

..

### E~g/MgofPtoduct Em,kglht 

### 1000kg --X--- PRkg/hr 

### 1Mg


# = < 0.008624 x10..., kg/Mg Antimony (Sb) 

## = 0.024061 x1 0..., kg/Mg Manganese (Mn) 0.435808 x1 0..., kg/Mg Arsenic (As) 0.668703 x1 0..., kg/Mg Mercury (Hg)



## = < 0.008624 x10..., kg/Mg Beryllium (Be) 

# = 0.222417 x1 0..., kg/Mg Nickel (Ni) 

# = < 0.004312 x1 

# o""' kg/Mg Cadmium (Cd) 

## = 0.555684 x1 0..., kg/Mg Selenium (Se) 

# = 0.378199 x10..., kg/Mg Chromium (Cr) 

## = 0.013511 x10..., kg/Mg Cobalt(Co)



## = 1.194506 x1 0..., kg/Mg Lead (Pb)



# A-53
ARI Environmental. Inc. Method 29 Multi-Metals Calc Summary

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-2



## y FACTOR: 0.995 STACK DIAM: 35.25 inches BAROMETRIC: METER VOLUME: 179.475 

# te STATIC PRES: METER TEMP: 103.2 °F STACK TEMP: 29.29 in. Hg -0.07 in.H 2 

## 0 447.0 °F LIQUID COLL: 304.6 milliliters SQ.RT AP: 0.3660 in.H 2 

## 0 1.82 in.H 2 

## 0 C0 2 : 

## 2.30 

## % by 

## volume AH: 0 2 : 

## 16.20 %by 

## volume

VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

528 Pbar 

## + 136 

## V 

# = -- xV x ·

mstd (29.92) m y 

## Tm 

# r AH 

# 1

y 

# = 0.995

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS 

# =

Vwstd 0.04707 X 

## Vic 

## =

VIc 

# = 304.6 mL ENGLISH UNITS 

## (29 92 in Hg 

## & 

## 68 °F)

164.640 dscf

14.338 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED
Vwstd 

## = 0.0801

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION

[ [ 8.361 (

# 1~93.5 

# )J]

10 T 27.65 -0.5

MF= 

## = p 

## 1.0000

T 

# = 503.6 °K P 

# = 743.8 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS

Bws 

# = 0.0801



# A-54

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-2 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/2010

BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT .!lP: 29.29 in. Hg -0.07 in.H 2 

## 0

447 °F 0.366 in.H 2 

## 0 STACKDIAM: 

## C02:

02:

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

M 5 

## =Md(1-Bws)+18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT

CP (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

## .fiP =-I 

# Ji.P

n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 447.0 OF+ 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

p p Pstatic s = bar+-- 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V 5 

## = (85.49)(CP)(avg.fiP)

# (Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual as = 60 X 

## Vs xAs

Stack Area= 6.7771 

# te

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis ( 528 ) (Ps 

# J astdw = 29.92 (as) Ts
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis

a =( 528 }a

# f=~}1-B )

std 29.92 s Ts ws 35.25 inches 2.30 

## % by volume 16.20 

## % by volume

= 29.02

= 28.13

= 0.84

= 0.3660

= 907.0

= 29.28

= 27.577

= 11,214

= 6,389.3 383,356

= 5,877.4 352,646 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh



# A-55

### ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. USEPA METHOD 5- FILTERABLE PARTICULATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC TEST DATE: 8/3/10 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-2

INPUT Vm: 179.475 

## ft3 yFACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.29 in.Hg AH: 1.82 in.H 2 

### 0 Tm: 103.2 OF Qs: 5,877.4 dscfm Ts: 447.0 OF Runtime: 240.0 minutes Vs: 27.577 ft/sec Ps: 29.28 in.Hg 

# v,c: 304.6 mL Noz. diam: 0.377 inches Mn front: 18.52 mg Production Rate: 1,653 lb/hr C0 2 : 

### 2.30 %by volume 749.8 kg/hr Oz: 16.20 %by volume ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg 

### & 68 °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

Vmstd ( 52 8 ) x x bar 

### + 1 3.6 

# [p AH]
29.92 Vm 

### y Tm = 164.640 dscf



### y= 0.995 VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS Vwstd = 0.04707 X 

### VIc = 14.338 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS

Bws 

# = Vwstd X 

### 100 = 8.01 % Vwstd + Vmstd PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION IN STACK GAS ON A DRY BASIS Filterable 

## = 0.00174 gr/dscf Cs (0.01543{

# ~) Vmstd

cs,mg/dsem@7%0, {Mn){35.315) 

# x( 13.9 ) 

## = 11.748 mg/dscm @ 7% 0 2 

### {Vmstd) 20.9-%0 2

# c~ = (2.205 x 

## 10- 6 {

# ~) C' s 

### Filterable = 0.24804 

# x 10.,; lbs/dscf

Vmstd EMISSION RATE

# ~~**)ostd)(6o)** pmr = 0.08744 lbs/hr 0.03966 kg/hr

ERib/1onofProduct 20001b lb/ton of product



# -- = 0.10580 PRibthr 1ton

ER

_ pmrlbtnr x 1000kg = 0.05290 kg/Mg of product kgtMgo!Product- (PR )(2 20461b/k ) 1M kg/hr · 9 9 ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE
(100)(Ts{(0.002669 x

# VIc)+(~: }r{Pbar +(

# ~~ ))]

= 102.05 %1 %ISO= (60)(9)(V 5 

### )(P 5 

### )(An) 

## An= 0.0007752 

# tr Runtime= 240 minutes


# A-56

# ---- Metals Laborato!:Y Data Summa!:Y 

# ---- 

# --- =- 

# = = ,.=:;: 

# = 

# • =!'it..!**·£MII'I~-t~** 

# .... NC. Client: Kohler Company Location: Kohler, Wisconsin Source: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC Date: 8/3/2010 Run#: TK19-M29-2 Front Half Metal Calculation



### I Value II Values Detection FH Sample FH Blank 

## A Value 5 %ofFH Lesser value Greater Value Blank Value Blank Corrected

Limit (Mfh) (Mlllbl (4 inch filter) Sample (Mftlbl vs5% I 

### vs II Used Sample Mass Metal (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) {micrograms! !micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms! {micrograms) Antimony 0.2 2.6000 2.0500 17.590 0.130 0.130 17.590 2.050 0.550 Arsenic 1 13.9000 1.0000 17.590 0.695 0.695 17.590 1.000 12.900
Beryllium 0.2 0.2000 0.2000 17.590 0.010 0.010 17.590 0.200 0.000 Cadmium 0.1 0.5770 0.3300 17.590 0.029 0.029 17.590 0.330 0.247 Chromium 1 20.6000 3.8800 17.590 1.030 1.030 17.590 3.880 16.720 Lead 0.5 55.0000 1.3600 17.590 2.750 2.750 17.590 1.360 53.640 Manganese 0.5 3.7900 2.5300 17.590 0.190 0.190 17.590 2.530 1.260 Nickel 0.2 3.9600 2.2900 17.590 0.198 0.198 17.590 2.290 1.670 Selenium 2 9.2700 2.0000 17.590 0.464 0.464 17.590 2.000 7.270 Cobalt 0.2 0.3970 0.2000 17.590 0.020 0.020 17.590 0.200 0.197

Back Half Metal Calculation



### I Value It Values Detection BHSample BH Blank 5%ofBH Lesser value Greater Value Blank Value Blank Corrected

Limit {Mbhl {Mbhl>l Sample (Mbhl VS 5'Yo lvs II Used Sample Mass Metal !micro!! rams) (micrograms) (micrograms) {micrograms) !micrograms) {micro11rams! !micrograms) {micrograms! {micrograms! Antimony 0.1 0.1690 0.1290 1.000 0.008 0.008 1.000 0.129 0.040 Arsenic 0.2 16.6000 0.2000 1.000 0.830 0.830 1.000 0.200 16.400
Beryllium 0.1 0.1000 0.1000 1.000 0.005 0.005 1.000 0.100 0.000 Cadmium 0.05 0.2750 0.5930 1.000 0.014 0.014 1.000 0.593 -0.318 Chromium 0.15 1.9000 0.5410 1.000 0.095 0.095 1.000 0.541 1.359 Lead 0.05 0.6480 0.2340 1.000 0.032 0.032 1.000 0.234 0.414 Manganese 0.15 1.0600 0.7630 1.000 0.053 0.053 1.000 0.763 0.297 Nickel 0.1 1.9300 1.3600 1.000 0.097 0.097 1.000 1.000 0.930 Selenium 1 34.7000 1.0000 1.000 1.735 1.000 1.000 1.000 33.700 Cobalt 0.1 0.3180 0.1000 1.000 0.016 0.016 1.000 0.100 0.218

FHSample FH Blank BHSample BH Blank Total Metal {Mftl) {Mihbl (Mbh) {Mbhbl (MJ Metal (micrograms! !micrograms) {micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) Antimony 2.600 2.050 0.169 0.129 0.590 ADL Arsenic 13.900 1.000 16.600 0.200 29.300 ADL
Beryllium 0.200 0.200 0.100 0.100 0.300 BDL Cadmium 0.577 0.330 0.275 0.593 0.150 BDL Chromium 20.600 3.880 1.900 0.541 18.079 ADL Lead 55.000 1.360 0.648 0.234 54.054ADL Manganese 3.790 2.530 1.060 0.763 1.557 ADL Nickel 3.960 2.290 1.930 1.000 2.600 ADL Selenium 9.270 2.000 34.700 1.000 40.970 ADL Cobalt 0.397 0.200 0.318 0.100 0.415 ADL

Mt (Mfh

- Mfhb) 

### + (Mbh

- Mbhb)



# A-57)>

I

()1

())

---- ------ --- ----- ----- --- =r-=1 **~~~II**

-----

.,.. ENVI!fONMENTAL Y INC.

Client: Location: Source: Date: Run#: Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin Tunnel Kiln #19 - POC 8/3/2010 TK19-M29-2 Mercury Laboratory Data Summary
Sample Volume (Vmstd):
Stack Oxygen (%0 2 ): Mercury Calculation Front-half Back-half 164.640 dscf 16.2%

Detection Sample Sample Blank Blank Blank Corrected Concentration

Limit (Hgth) (Hgbh) (Hgthb) ( H gbhb2,3A,3B,3c) Sample Mass (C.)

Metal Fraction (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (J.lg/dscm)

Mercury 1B (Hg 1 h) 0.015 0.0329 0.015 0.0179 0.0040

2B (Hgbh2l 0.005 0.971 0.13 0.841 0.1857

3A (Hgbh3A) 0.005 0.0193 0.005 0.0143 0.0032

3B (Hgbh3B) 0.025 25.1 0.068 25.032 5.5268

3C (Hgbh3c) 0.025 0.492 0.025 0.467 0.1031

0.0329 26.5823 0.015 0.228 5.823

Total (Hg 1 ) = 26.372 J.lg

Hgt = (Hgfh - Hgfhb) + [ (Hgbh2 + Hgbh3A + Hgbh3B + Hgbh3C)- (Hgbhb2 + Hgbhb3A + Hgbhb3B + Hgbhb3C) J Concentration (C.) (J.lg/dscm @ 7% 0 2 ) 0.0117 0.1235 0.0021 3.6757 0.0686 3.882

# ---- 

# ----**-~-** 

## USEPA Method 29



# --- -- 

# ----- 

# --- _ 

# ...... . Metals Emissions Calculation Summary 

# 1la--

.... .

....

ElYVII!Ofii!Q!,YTAt.Y'INC.
Client: Location: Source: Date: Run#: Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin Tunnel Kiln #19- POC 813/2010 TK19-M29-2


### Test Data Input Metals Laboratory Analysis Weights (M t) Barometric pressure (P.,,): Stack pressure (P ,): Test length (6): Sample nozzle diameter (0,): Sample nozzle area (A 0 ): Stack temperature (T,): Volume metered (Vm,,.): Stack gas velocity (V,): Stack gas volumetric flow (Q,,.): Fractional Moisture content (Bw,): Stack Oxygen Content (%0 2 ): 29.29 inches Hg 29.28 Inches Hg Abs. 240.0 minutes 0.3770 inches 0.000775 lt 3 447.0 Of 164.640 dscf 27.577 ftlsec 352,646 dscfh 0.0801

16.2% Antimony (Sb): Arsenic (As): Beryllium (Be): Cadmium (Cd): Chromium (Cr): Lead (Pb):


### Production Data

Process Rate (PR):



### Sample calculations @standard conditions (29.92 inches Hg, 68.0 "F): Metals co.ncentratiOil (pg/dscm): ' · 

# ''.> '

. . ·.·.······•· ·• •;: '· · .. c =

## ~



# ,**[(35.315~~cf/dscm)]** = < 0.126554 1'9/dscm Antimony (Sb) 

## = = 6.284793 !'g/dscm Arsenic 

### (As) 

## =
= < 0.064349 1'9/dscm Beryllium (Be) 

## = = < 0.032175 1'9/dscm Cadmium (Cd) 

## = 

## = 3.87791 0 1'9/dscm Chromium (Cr) 

## = = 11.594478 1'9/dscm Lead (Pb) 

# ··.· ····· 

## ·-:;· < 0.59 j.lQ 29.30 ll9 <0.30 j.lQ

< 0.15 j.lQ 18.08 ll9 54.05 j.lQ

1 ,653 lblhr of ware 749.8 kglhr of ware



### 0.333973 l'g/dscm 5.656786 1'9/dscm
< 0.557695 1'9/dscm

8.787986 1'9/dscm 0.089017 1'9/dscm Manganese (Mn): Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni): Selenium (Se): Cobalt(Co)

· ..



### Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Cobalt (Co)

Metals concentration ( pg/dsc.m @ 7% 0 2 ): 

# c -c x 

# 13.9

'·"g/dacm@l%0 2

- s,"g/dsom 

### 20 . 9 _ 

### %0 2 

### < 0.374276



### = 18.586942


## = < 0.190310


## = < 0.095155



### = 11.468714



### = 34.290053 Metals c.oncentrat;on ( 

## xio·• lbldscf):



## = < 0.007900


## = 0.392339


## = < 0.004017



## = < 0.002009


## = 0.242085


## = 0.723805 Metals emission 

### rata ( x10"" lblhr):



## = < 0.027860 

# = 1.383567



## = < 0.014166 

# = < 0.007083 

# = 0.853704 

# = 2.552469

Metals emission rate (**x10~** lcfi/hr):



# = < 0.012637 

# = 0.627582


## = < 0.006426 

# = < 0.003213 

# = 0.387237



## = 1.157792 Antimony (Sb) Arsenic 

### (As) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Lead (Pb)

x 10""1bldscf Antimony (Sb)
x 1o·• lbldscf Arsenic 

### (As)
x 10""1bldscf Beryllium (Be)
x 10""" lbldscf Cadmium (Cd)
x 1o·• lbldscf Chromium (Cr)
x 10-"lb/dscf**L~d** 

### (Pb) 

# =
=



# =

= 

## =
= 

## =

Em=C\xQ,. 0 

### x1 O""lblhr Antimony (Sb) 

### = x10""Ib/hr Arsenic 

### (As) 

# = x10""1blhr Beryllium (Be) 

## = x1 O"'lb/hr Cadmium (Cd) 

## = x1 O""lb/hr Chromium (Cr) 

### = x1 O""lb/hr Lead (Pb)

Em,kg/hr X 

### 1kg 

### 2.20461b x10"" kg/hr Antimony (Sb) 

## = x10"" kg/hr Arsenic 

### (As) 

## = x10 4 

### kg/hr Beryllium (Be) 

## = x10

... kg/hr Cadmium (Cd) x10 4 

### kg/hr Chromium (Cr) 

## = x10 4 

### kg/hr Lead (Pb) 0.987709 16.729643

< 1.649353 25.990000

0.263262 Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Cobalt(Co)

0.020849 X 

### 1 o·· lbldscf Manganese (Mn) 0.353135 x 10'"1b/dscf Mercury (Hg)
< 0.034815 x 1o·• lbldscf Nickel (Ni)

0.548605 x 10'"1bldscf Selenium (Se) 0.005557 x 10-"lb/dscf Cobalt (Co)

0.073523 1.245315
< 0.122774

1.934633 0.019597

0.033350 0.564871 <0.055690

0.877544 0.008889 x1 0"" lb/hr Manganese (Mn) x10""Ib/hr Mercury (Hg) x10""1blhr Nickel (Ni) x10"'1b/hr Selenium (Se) x1 O""lb/hr Cobalt (Co)

x10"" kg/hr Manganese (Mn) x10 4 

### kg/hr Mercury (Hg) x10 4 

### kg/hr Nickel (Ni) x10 4 

### kg/hr Selenium (Se) x10

... kg/hr Cobalt (Co) 1.56 ug 26.37 j.lg

< 2.60 j.lg 40.97 j.lg 0.42 j.lg



# A-59
ARI Environmental. Inc. Method 29 Multi-Metals Calc SummaryMetals emission rate, Production Based ( x10<4 fblton of product):



## = < 0.033709 x10

... 1b/ton



## = 1.674008 x10

... 1b/ton



## = < 0.017140 x10

... 1b/ton



## = < 0.008570 x1 O

... lb/ton



## = 1.032914 x1 O

... lb/ton



## = 3.088287 x1 O

... lblton

Metals emission rate ( x10

.. kg/Mg of prottuct):



## = < 0.016854 x10

... kg/Mg 

# = 0.837004 x1 0

... kg/Mg



## = < 0.008570 x1 0

... kg/Mg 

# = < 0.004285 x1 0

... kg/Mg



### = 0.516457 x1 0

... kg/Mg 

# = 1.544144 x10

... kg/Mg



# A-60

ARI Environmental, Inc. Emlblhr 

### 20001b
ERibllonorProduct = 

# -PR X 

# ---:rtOn

!bfht 

### Antimony (Sb) Arsenic (As) Beryllium (Be) Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Lead (Pb) 

### = 

## =

=

Em.kglhr 

### 1 000 kg ERkg/MgofProduct

### =~X**~g** kglhr 

### Antimony (Sb) 

## = Arsenic (As) 

## = Beryllium (Be) 

# = Cadmium (Cd) Chromium (Cr) Lead (Pb)

Method 29 Multi-Metals Calc Summary 

### Run No. TK19-M29-2



### 0.088957 x1 O

... lb/ton 

### 1.506733 x1 O

... lblton 

### 0.148547 x10

... 1b/ton 

### 2.340754 x1 O

... lb/ton 

### 0.023710 x10

... 1blton



### 0.044478 x10

... kg/Mg 

### 0. 753366 x1 0

... kg/Mg 

### 0.074273 x1 0

... kg/Mg 

### 1.170377 x1 0

... kg/Mg 

### 0.011855 x1 0

... kg/Mg 

### continued

Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Cobalt(Co)

Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Cobalt (Co)

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-3
yFACTOR: BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: AH: 0.995 29.23 in. Hg -0.08 in.H 2 

## 0 445.3 °F 0.3493 in.H 2 

## 0 1.60 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK DIAM: 35.25 inches METER VOLUME: 165.630 

# te
METER TEMP: 86.5 °F LIQUID COLL: 288.1 milliliters C0 2 : 

## 2.60 % by volume

0 2 : 

## 16.20 

## % by volume

ENGLISH UNITS (29 92 in Hg 

## & °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

528 bar+ 

## 136 

## V = -- 

## xV x ·

mstd (29.92) m y 

## Tm 

# l p 

## LlH 

# j

y 

# = 0.995

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS 

# =

vwstd 

# = 0.04707 X VIc 

# =

VIc 

# = 288.1 ml

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED



# =

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION 

# [Js361-(**~~:s)]l_**

# 05

MF= 

# = p 

## T 

# = 502.6 °K P 

# = 742.3 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS

Bws 

# = 156.177 dscf

13.561 scf

0.0799

1.0000

0.0799



# A-61

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-3 SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/2010

BAROMETRIC: 29.23 in. Hg STACK DIAM: STATIC PRES: -0.08 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK TEMP: 445.3 °F SQ.RT L\P: 0.3493 in.H 2 

## 0

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS 

## C02: 02:

Md 

# = 0.44(%C0 2 

## )+0.32(%0 2 

## )+0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms 

# = Md (1 Bws) + 18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# JiiP

=- 

# 2:. Jti>

n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts 

# = 445.3 °F 

# + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p R Pstatic s = 

## bar+-- 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY



## Vs (85.49)(Cp)(avg,J;1P)

# /(Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual 0 5 

### = 

## 60 X 

## V 5 

## XA 5


## Stack Area= 6.7771 

# ft2

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis
( 528 

# J (Ps) Qstdw 

# = 29.92 (Qs) Ts
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis (528) (Ps) Qstd 

# = 29.92 (Qs) T 5 ( 

## 1 Bws)



# A-62 35.25 inches 2.60 % by volume 16.20% by volume



# = 29.06



# = 28.18

= 0.84



# = 0.3493

= 905.3



# = 29.22



# = 26.300



## = 10,694

= 6,092.1 365,525



# = 5,605.4 336,322 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ftlsec

acfm

scfm, wb seth, wb

dscfm dscfh

### ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. USEPA METHOD 5- FILTERABLE PARTICULATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #19

- POC TEST DATE: 8/4/1 0 RUN NUMBER: TK19-M29-3

INPUT Vm: 165.63 

# tf yFACTOR: 0.995 Pbar: 29.23 in.Hg ..iH: 1.60 in.H 2 0 Tm: 86.5 

## Of Qs: 5,605.4 dscfm Ts: 445.3 

## Of Runtime: 240.0 minutes Vs: 26.300 ft/sec Ps: 29.22 in.Hg VIc: 288.1 mL Noz. diam: 0.377 inches Mn front: 16.31 mg Production Rate: 1,751 lb/hr C0 2 : 2.60 %by volume 794.2 kglhr 02: 16.20 %by volume ENGLISH UNITS (29.92 in.Hg 

### & 68 °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

528 Pbar + 136 

### [ dH 

# l

Vmstd=(29.92)xvmxy Tm

. 

## = 156.177 dscf

y= 0.995 VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE@ STANDARD CONDITIONS Vwsld = 0.04707 X 

### vic = 13.561 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS



## Bws Vw&d**Vws~d** 

### + Vmstd x100 = 7.99 %

PARTICULATE CONCENTRATION IN STACK GAS ON A DRY BASIS

Cs = 

### (0.01543{

# ~) Filterable 

# = 0.00161 gr/dscf
vmstd

C _(Mn)(35.315)x( 13.9 )

s,mgldscm@7%0,- (Vmsld) 20.9-%02 = 10.907 mg/dscm @ 7% 0 2

## c~ (2.205x1o- 6 {

# ~} C's Filterable = 0.23027 

# x 10-ti lbs/dscf 

### Vmstd EMISSION RATE

# )as~d)(6o) pmr = 0.07742 lbs/hr 0.03512 kg/hr

ER = 

### pmftb/hr x 20001b lb/tono!Product PRib/hr 1ton = 0.08843 lb/ton of product

ERkg/MgofProduet pmrlbthr 1000kg
= 0.04422 kg/Mg of product (PRkglhr) ( 2.20461b 

## I kg) X 

### 1Mg ISOKINETIC SAMPLING RATE

%ISO (100)(T 5 

### {(0.002669 x

# VIc)+(~: 

# }r {Pbar +(

# ~) )] (60)(9 )(V 5 

### )(P 5 

### )(An) = 101.50 %1

An= 0.0007752 

## ft<: Runtime= 240 minutes


# A-63

# ---- Metals Laboratory Data Summary 

# ---- 

# ------ 

# ----- ----- 

# ---

- - ="'IL Ill 

# wa-- ,..._ .,..I!NIIRONIIINTAI..

.. INC.. 

### Client: Kohler Company 

### Location: Kohler, Wisconsin 

### Source: Tunnel Kiln #19- POC 

### Date: 8/4/2010 

### Run#: TK19-M29-3 

### Front Half Metal Calculation

I Value II Values Detection FHSample FH Blank 

## A Value 5%ofFH Lesser value Greater Value Blank Value Blank Corrected

Limit (Mn,) (Mihb) (4 inch filter) Sample (MIIIb) vs 5% 

### lvsll Used Sample Mass Metal (micrograms} (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms} (micrograms) (micrograms) jmicrograms) {micrograms! !micrograms) Antimony 0.2 2.6500 2.0500 17.590 0.133 0.133 17.590 2.050 0.600 Arsenic 1 12.9000 1.0000 17.590 0.645 0.645 17.590 1.000 11.900
Beryllium 0.2 0.2000 0.2000 17.590 0.010 0.010 17.590 0.200 0.000 Cadmium 0.1 1.1100 0.3300 17.590 0.056 0.056 17.590 0.330 0.780 Chromium 1 30.7000 3.8800 17.590 1.535 1.535 17.590 3.880 26.820 Lead 0.5 46.6000 1.3600 17.590 2.330 2.330 17.590 1.360 45.240 Manganese 0.5 4.0100 2.5300 17.590 0.201 0.201 17.590 2.530 1.480 Nickel 0.2 5.9200 2.2900 17.590 0.296 0.296 17.590 2.290 3.630 Selenium 2 8.8000 2.0000 17.590 0.440 0.440 17.590 2.000 6.800 Cobalt 0.2 0.4960 0.2000 17.590 0.025 0.025 17.590 0.200 0.296



### Back Half Metal Calculation

I Value II Values Detection BHSample BH Blank 5%ofBH Lesser value Greater Value Blank Value Blank Corrected

Limit (Mbh) (Mbhb) Sample (Mbh} vs 5% lvs II Used Sample Mass Metal !micrograms) {micrograms) !micrograms) (micrograms) {micrograms} (micrograms} (micrograms}**(micrograms~** {micrograms} Antimony 0.1 4.6500 0.1290 1.000 0.233 0.233 1.000 0.129 4.521 Arsenic 0.2 22.9000 0.2000 1.000 1.145 1.000 1.000 0.200 22.700
Beryllium 0.1 0.1000 0.1000 1.000 0.005 0.005 1.000 0.100 0.000 Cadmium 0.05 0.0643 0.5930 1.000 0.003 0.003 1.000 0.593 -0.529 Chromium 0.15 1.9800 0.5410 1.000 0.099 0.099 1.000 0.541 1.439 Lead 0.05 0.7530 0.2340 1.000 0.038 0.038 1.000 0.234 0.519 Manganese 0.15 0.6960 0.7630 1.000 0.035 0.035 1.000 0.763 -0.067 Nickel 0.1 1.2700 1.3600 1.000 0.064 0.064 1.000 1.000 0.270 Selenium 1 33.4000 1.0000 1.000 1.670 1.000 1.000 1.000 32.400 Cobalt 0.1 0.3840 0.1000 1.000 0.019 0.019 1.000 0.100 0.284

FHSample FH Blank BHSample BH Blank Total Metal (M111} (Mn,b) (Mbh} (Mbhb} 

### (MJ Metal (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms! (microsrams} (micrograms} Antimony 2.650 2.050 4.650 0.129 5.121 ADL Arsenic 12.900 1.000 22.900 0.200 34.600 ADL
Beryllium 0.200 0.200 0.100 0.100 0.300 BDL Cadmium 1.110 0.330 0.064 0.593 0.251 ADL Chromium 30.700 3.880 1.960 0.541 28.259 ADL Lead 46.600 1.360 0.753 0.234 45.759 ADL Manganese 4.010 2.530 0.696 0.763 1.413 ADL Nickel 5.920 2.290 1.270 1.000 3.900 ADL Selenium 8.800 2.000 33.400 1.000 39.200 ADL Cobalt 0.496 0.200 0.384 0.100 0.580 ADL



## Mt 

# = (Mfh

- Mfho) + 

# (Moh

- Mohb)

A-641" 0> 01 ---- ------ --- ----- ----- --- ir'll'-1

.... ENVJRON!tiENTAL ....- INC, Client: Location: Source: Date: Run#: Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin Tunnel Kiln #19 - POC 8/4/2010 TK19-M29-3 Mercury Laboratory Data Summary
Sample Volume (Ymstd):
Stack Oxygen (%0

2 ): Mercury Calculation Front-half Back-half 156.177 dscf 16.2%

Detection Sample Sample Blank Blank Blank Corrected Concentration

Limit (Hglll) (Hgbh) (Hglllb) (Hgbhb2,3A,3B,3C) Sample Mass (Cs)

Metal

Fraction (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (micrograms) (!lg/dscm)

Mercury 1B (Hglll) 0.015 0.0407 0.015 0.0257 0.0057

2B (Hgbh2) 0.005 0.768 0.13 0.638 0.1409

3A (Hgbh3A) 0.005 0.015 0.005 0.01 0.0022

3B (Hgbh3e) 0.025 25.4 0.068 25.332 5.5930

3C (Hgbh3c) 0.025 0.145 0.025 0.12 0.0265

0.0407 26.3280 0.015 0.228 5.768

Total (Hg 1 ) = 26.126 llg

Hgt ( Hgfh Hgfhb) + [ (Hgbh2 + Hgbh3A + Hgbh3B + Hgbh3C)- (Hgbhb2 + Hgbhb3A + Hgbhb3B + Hgbhb3C) J Concentration (Cs) **(~ig/dscm** @ 7% 02) 0.0168 0.0937 0.0015 3.7197 0.0176 3.849

# ---- 

# ---- 

# ----- USEPA Method 29



# ----- ----- 

# ;;:::::;; ;;;;[ = Metals Emissions Calculation Summary 

# •=•"-•
.,.l!N'.'I!?O'"'"'.wr"'tY v.;c
Client: Location: Source: Date: Run#: Kohler Company Kohler, Wisconsin Tunnel Kiln #19- POC 08/04/10 TK19-M29-3


### Test Data Input Metals Laboratory Analysis Weights (M 1 ) Barometric pressure (P

.. ,}: Stack pressure (P ,): Test length (9): Sample nozzle diameter (0,): Sample nozzle area (A,): Stack temperature (T ,): Volume metered (Vm,.,): Stack gas velocity (V,): Stack gas volumetric flow (Q,.,): Fractional Moisture content (Bw,): Stack Oxygen Content (%0 2 }: 29.23 inches Hg 29.22 Inches Hg Abs. 240.0 minutes 0.3770 inches 0.000775 

### ft' 445.3 Of 156.177 dscf 26.300 ftlsec 336,322 dscfh 0.0799

16.2 

### 'Yo Antimony (Sb}: Arsenic (As}: Beryllium (Be}: Cadmium (Cd): Chromium (Cr): Lead (Pb}:


### Production Data

Process Rate (PR):



### Sample calculations @standard conditions (29.92 inches Hg, 68.0 °F}: Metals coneentration ( p gtdscm): · .··· • : •-·· · • ··.


# c.= M, 

# [(

# 35.315~;~ /dscm)]

= 1.157968 Jlg/dscm Antimony (Sb) 

## = 

# = 7.823801 Jlg/dscm Arsenic 

### (As) 

## = 

# = < 0.067836 Jlg/dscm Beryllium (Be) 

## = < 0.056824 11g/dscm Cadmium (Cd) 

## = 

# = 6.389965 Jlgldscm Chromium (Cr) 

## = 

# = 10.347089 11g/dscm Lead (Pb)

Metals concentration( pg/dscm@ 7% 0 2 ):



## = 3.424628 23.138474



## = < 0.200623



## = < 0.168055 18.897981 30.600966 Metals concentration ( x10

.. lbldsc:t):



# = 0.072288 

# = 0.488414


## = < 0.004235


## = < 0.003547 

# = 0.398905


## = 0.645935 Metals emission rate ( x10

.. lblhr):



## = 0.243121



## = 1.642645


## = < 0.014243


## = < 0.011931 1.341604



## = 2.172422

Metals emission 

### rate ( xfO

.. kg/hr}:



### 0.110279


## = 0.745099



## = < 0.006460 

# = < 0.005412


## = 0.608548


## = 0.985404



# A-66

ARI Environmental, Inc. 

### Antimony (Sb) Arsenic 

### (As) 

# = Beryllium (Be) 

# = Cadmium (Cd) 

## = Chromium (Cr) 

## = Lead (Pb)



### ( 2.2046x10- 9 

### lb xM,) 

### C's 

# = j.LQ
vmstd 

### x 1o·• lb/dscf Antimony (Sb) 

## = x 1o·• lb/dscf Arsenic 

### (As)
x 1o·• lb/dscf Beryllium (Be)
x 10""1b/dscf Cadmium (Cd) 

## = x 10""1b/dscf Chromium (Cr) 

## = x 1o·• lb/dscf Lead (Pb)

x1 O""lb/hr Antimony (Sb) x1 O"'lblhr Arsenic (As) x10"'Iblhr Beryllium (Be) x10"'1blhr Cadmium (Cd) x10"'1b/hr Chromium (Cr) x10"'1blhr Lead (Pb)

x10"' kglhr Antimony (Sb) x10"' kg/hr Arsenic (As) x10"' kg/hr Beryllium (Be) x10"' kglhr Cadmium (Cd) x1 0

... kg/hr Chromium (Cr) x10

... kglhr Lead (Pb) 

## = = = = 

# =

E X 

### 1kg



### m 2.20461b



## = = =
= 

## =

Method 29 Multi-Metals Calc Summary 5.12 119 34.60 l'g

< 0.30 1'9

< 0.25 1'9 28.26 1'9 45.76119 Manganese (Mn): Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni): Selenium (Se): Cobalt{Co)

1, 751 lblhr of ware 794.2 kg/hr of ware



### 0.319510 5.907580 0.881873 8.863959 0.131150

0.944932 17.471354
< 2.608094 26.214687

0.387870

0.019946 0.368791 0.055052 0.553348 0.008187

0.067083 1.240325 0.185154 1.861031 0.027536

0.030428 0.562608 0.083985 0.844158 0.012490 · ..



### 11gldscm Manganese (Mn) 11g/dscm Mercury (Hg) llg/dscm Nickel (Ni) 11g/dscm Selenium (Se) Jlgldscm Cobalt (Co)

Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg) Nickel (Ni) Selenium (Se) Cobalt(Co)

x 1o·• lbldscf Manganese (Mn)
x 10""1bldscf Mercury (Hg)
x 1o·• lb/dscf Nickel (Ni) x 1 0"" lb/dscf Selenium (Se)
X 

### 1 o·• lbldscf Cobalt (Co)

x1 O""lblhr Manganese (Mn) x10"'Ib/hr Mercury (Hg) x10"'1b/hr Nickel (Ni) x1 O""lb/hr Selenium (Se) x10""1b/hr Cobalt (Co)

x10

... kglhr Manganese (Mn) x10

... kglhr Mercury (Hg) x10

... kg/hr Nickel (Ni) x10

... kglhr Selenium (Se) x10

... kg/hr Cobalt (Co) 1.41 ug 26.13 pg 3.90 1'9 39.20 1'9 0.58 

### pgMetals emission rate, Production Based ( x10 4 tbfton 

### of product): 

## Runflq. TK19·M29-3 

## continued

ERib/tonofProduct Em,lblhc 

### 2000 lb**~-x--** PR!blhr 

### 1ton 

# = 0.277694 x10""1b/ton Antimony (Sb) 

# = 0.076622 x10

... 1blton Manganese (Mn) 

# = 1.876237 x10"" lblton Arsenic (As) 

### 1.416705 x10

... 1b/ton Mercury (Hg) 

# = < 0.016268 x10""Ib/ton Beryllium (Be) 

# = 0.211483 x10""Iblton Nickel (Ni) 

# = < 0.013627 x10"" lb/ton Cadmium (Cd) 

## = 2.125678 x1 

## o"" lblton Selenium (Se) 

# = 1.532386 x1 

## o"" lblton Chromium (Cr) 

# = 0.031451 x10

... 1blton Cobalt(Co) 

# = 2.481350 x1 O

... lblton Lead (Pb)

Metals emission 

### rate ( x10.., kg/Mg of product):

. . ERkgiMgofProduct Em,kglhr 

### 1000 kg --x--- PR.g,hr 

### 1Mg



## = 0.138847 x10

... kg/Mg Antimony (Sb) 

# = 0.038311 x10

... kg/Mg Manganese (Mn)



## = 0.938118 x10"' kg/Mg Arsenic (As) 

# = 0.708353 x10"' kg/Mg Mercury (Hg) 

# = < 0.008134 x10"' kg/Mg Beryllium (Be) 

# = 0.105742 x10"' kg/Mg Nickel (Ni) 

# = < 0.006814 x10

... kg/Mg Cadmium (Cd) 

## = 1.062839 x10"' kg/Mg Selenium (Se)



## = 0.766193 x10"' kg/Mg Chromium (Cr) 

## = 0.015726 x10"' kg/Mg Cobalt(Co) 

# = 1.240675 x10"' kg/Mg Lead (Pb)



# A-67
ARI Environmental, Inc. Method 29 Multi-Metals Calc Summary

### SUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS 

# -==--==- 

# = 

# =•r-&

**'="·-~=** COMPANY Kohler Company LOCATION Kohler, Wisconsin SOURCE Ware Dryer #1

RUN NO WD1-M23-1 WD1-M23-2 WD1-M23-3 TEST DATE 8/5/2010 8/5/2010 8/6/2010 TEST TIME 07:35

- 11:37 12:17- 16:20 07:30-11:12 Average
Stack Gas Parameters Temperature, °F 179.0 179.1 177.8 178.6 Velocity, av. ftlsec 18.204 17.695 18.088 17.996 Volumetric flow, acfm 3,360.3 3,266.4 3,338.8 3,321.8 Volumetric flow, accm 95.153 92.493 94.544 94.063 Volumetric flow, scfm 2,708.3 2,631.5 2,705.6 2,681.8 Volumetric flow, dscfm 2,494.1 2,444.2 2,507.2 2,481.8 Volumetric flow, dscmm 70.625 69.210 70.996 70.277 Volumetric flow, dscfh 149,648 146,650 150,433 148,910 Moisture, av.% vol 7.91 7.12 7.33 7.45 Carbon Dioxide, av.% vol 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.03 Oxygen, av. 

## % vol 20.70 20.80 20.80 20.77
Samele Parameters Time, min 240.0 240.0 240.0 240.0 Volume, dscf 148.896 144.938 148.931 147.588 Volume, dscm 4.217 4.105 4.218 4.180 Total Dioxins collected, nanograms 1.62 0.90 2.61 1.71 Total Furans collected, nanograms 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 lsokinetic Ratio, % 98.7 98.1 98.2 98.3
Total Dioxins and Furans Emissions Concentration ng/dscm
2,3,7,8-TCDD < 

### 0.00059 < 

### 0.00117 < 

### 0.00066 < 

### 0.00081 Total TCDD < 

### 0.00059 < 

### 0.00061 < 

### 0.00066 < 

### 0.00062 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD < 

### 0.00074 < 

### 0.00139 0.00173 < 

### 0.00129 Total PeCDD 0.00208 0.00407 0.00683 0.00433 1 ,2,3,4, 7,8 HxCDD < 

### 0.00083 < 

### 0.00046 0.00165 < 

### 0.00098 1 ,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD < 

### 0.00218 < 

### 0.00205 < 

### 0.00168 < 

### 0.00197 1 ,2,3, 7 ,8,9 HxCDD < 

### 0.00237 < 

### 0.00236 0.00427 < 

### 0.00300 Total HxCDD < 

### 0.00059 0.00577 0.01283 < 

### 0.00640 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.03296 0.01873 0.04552 0.03241 Total HpCDD 0.06142 0.03459 0.08346 0.05982 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD (Total) 0.32015 0.17321 0.51448 0.33595 2,3,7,8-TCDF < 

### 0.00026 < 

### 0.00027 < 

### 0.00038 < 

### 0.00030 Total TCDF < 

### 0.00026 < 

### 0.00027 < 

### 0.00038 < 

### 0.00030 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF < 

### 0.00028 < 

### 0.00039 < 

### 0.00047 < 

### 0.00038 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF < 

### 0.00026 < 

### 0.00037 < 

### 0.00047 < 

### 0.00037 Total PeCDF < 

### 0.00028 < 

### 0.00039 < 

### 0.00047 < 

### 0.00038 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF < 

### 0.00020 < 

### 0.00015 0.00040 < 

### 0.00025 1,2,3,6, 7,8 HxCDF < 

### 0.00019 < 

### 0.00013 < 

### 0.00020 < 

### 0.00018 1 ,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF < 

### 0.00031 < 

### 0.00014 < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00022 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00016 < 

### 0.00024 < 

### 0.00021 Total HxCDF < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00016 0.00040 < 

### 0.00026 1 ,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF < 

### 0.00052 < 

### 0.00041 < 

### 0.00026 < 

### 0.00040 1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00021 < 

### 0.00026 < 

### 0.00023 Total HpCDF < 

### 0.00022 < 

### 0.00021 < 

### 0.00033 < 

### 0.00025 1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF

**~Total~** 

### < 

### 0.00031 < 

### 0.00032 < 

### 0.00052 < 

### 0.00038 TOTAL 

## < 0.38613 

## < 0.21960 

## < 0.62036 

## < 0.40870 

# A-68

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010 RUN NUMBER: WD1-M23-1
yFACTOR: 0.999 BAROMETRIC: 29.18 in. Hg STATIC PRES: 0.050 in.H 2 0 STACK TEMP: 179.0 °F SQ.RT AP: 0.2866 in.H 2 0 AH: 1.23 in.H 2 0 STACK DIAM: 23.750 inches METER VOLUME: 158.210 

# te METER TEMP: 88.3 °F LIQUID COLL: 271.6 milliliters C02: 0.10 

## % by volume

02: 20.70 

## % by volume

ENGLISH UNITS 

## (29. 2 in. lg 

## 8 9 H 

## & 6 °F) VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

528 

## Pbar + 136 

# [

# ~ 1 Vmstd = 

## (29.92) 

## x Vm x y 

## Tm

. = 148.896 dscf

y= 0.999

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @ STANDARD CONDITIONS



## Vwstd = 

## 0.04707 X 

## 'Ire = 12.784 scf



## VIc= 271.6 mL

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED



## Bws = 

## vwsld = 0.0791 

## V

wsld + V msld

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION 

# l [

8361 ( 18 935 

# )J]
10 T 27.65 0.5

MF 

## = 0.5014 p


## T= 354.7 OK 

## P= 741.3 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS 

## Bws = 0.0791



# A-69

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: WD1-M23-1 SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010

BAROMETRIC: STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: 29.18 in. Hg 0.05 in.H 2 

## 0 179 °F 0.2866 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK DIAM: C0 2 :



## 02: 23.750 inches 0.10% by volume 20.70% by volume SQ.RT AP:

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS

Md = 

## 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO) 

# = 28.844

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

Ms Md(1-Bws)+18Bws 

# = 27.987

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications) 

## = 0.84

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

## FP=-I.JAP 

## = 0.2866 n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 179.0 

## Of + 460 = 639.0

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p 

## =R + Pstatic s bar 

## 13 . 6 = 

## 29.18

STACK GAS VELOCITY

vs 

## (85.49)(cp)(avgFP) 

# I (Ps;Ms) = 18.204

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Q 5 

## = 60 X 

## V 5 

## xA 5 

## = 3,360.33

Stack Area= 3.0765 

# te

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis

Qstdw

# (~}as{Ps) = 2,708.28 29.92 T 5 

## 162,496.9 STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis

Qstd

# (~)as{Ps 

# }1 Bws) = 2,494.13 29.92 T 5 

## 149,648.1



# A-70 lb/lb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ftlsec

acfm

scfm,wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh

## METHOD 23 ISOKINETIC CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010 RUN NO: WD1-M23-1



## Vm: yFACTOR: 158.21o 

# te
0.999 

## Pbar: 

## .1\H: Tm: 29.18 in. Hg 1.23 in. 

## H 2 

## 0 88.3 °F HCI in sample: 0.00 J19

Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis:

lsokinetic Sampling Rate



## %ISO

# (100)(Ts{(o.002669xVIc)+(~ 

# Jr{ F1,ar +(

# ~ ))] (60)(0)(V 5 

# )(P 5 )( 

# An) 149,648 dscfh 179.0 °F



# 240 minutes 18.204 fps

29.18 in. Hg 271.6 ml

English Units 

## (29.92 in. Hg, 68 °F)



# = 148.896 dscf



# = 98.72% I

0.00077519 

## ft' Runtime 

## (9) 

# = 240 minutes



# A-71)>

I

--...!

N COMPANY: Kohler Company

Kohler, Wisconsin

Ware Dryer #1

81512010

WD1-M23-1

07:35- 11:37 LOCATION: SOURCE:

TEST DATE:

TEST RUN NO. :

TEST TIME: SAMPLE VOLUME :

SAMPLE VOLUME :

GAS FLOW RATE:

OXYGEN CONTENT : DIOXIN I FURAN

COMPOUND 2,3,7,8-TCDD

Total TCDD

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD

TotatPacDD

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD

Total HxCDD

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD

TotaiHpCDD

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF

Total TCDF

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF

Total PeCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF

2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF

Total HxCDF

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF

Total HpCDF

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF

TOTAL 148.896 dscf 4.217 dscm

149,648 dscfh

20.70 % TOTAL ESTIMATED

SAMPLE DETECTION

MASS LIMIT

(nanogram) (nanogram)

< 0.00250 < 0.00250

< 0.00250 < 0.00250

< 0.00310 < 0.00310

0.00878 < 0.00310

< 0.00350 < 0.00230

< 0.00920 < 0.00250

< 0.01000 < 0.00230

< 0.00250 < 0.00250

0.13900 < 0.00620

0.25900 < 000620

1.35000 < 0.00190

< 0.00110 < 0.00110

< 0.00110 < 0.00110

< 0.00120 < 0.00120

< 0.00110 < 000110

< 0.00120 < 0.00120

< 0.00086 < 0.00086

< 0.00079 < 0.00079

< 0.00130 < 0.00083

< 0.00094 < 0.00094

< 0.00094 < 0.00094

< 0.00220 < 0.00071

< 0.00091 < 0.00091

< 0.00091 < 0.00091

< 0.00130 < 0.00110

1.62823 **eic~rams** to nanograms

M M, 1ng

'·"!! = '"'X 1000pg Production Rale: STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION

(nanogramldscm)

BDL < 0.00059

BDL < 0.00059

BDL < 0.00074

ADL 0.00208

BDL < 0.00083

BDL < 0.00218

BDL < 0.00237

BDL < 0.00059

ADL 0.03296

ADL 0.06142

ADL 0.32015

BDL < 0.00026

BDL < 0.00026

BDL < 0.00028

BDL < 0.00026

BDL < 0.00028

BDL < 0.00020

BDL < 0.00019

BDL < 0.00031

BDL < 0.00022

BDL < 0.00022

BDL < 0.00052

BDL < 0.00022

BDL < 0.00022

BDL < 0.00031

0.38613 Concentration, ngldscm Mn.ng

cd.og/d5tm = -v.--

mstd.d&cm DIOXINS AND FURANS EMISSIONS SUMMARY

2045 lbfhr

927.6 kglhr DETECTION LIMIT STACK GAS

STACK GAS CONCENTRATION

CONCENTRATION (lbldscf)

(nanogramldscm) x10' 12

< 0.00059 < 0.00004

< 0.00059 < 0.00004

< 0.00074 < 0.00005

< 0.00074 0.00013

< 0.00055 < 0.00005

< 0.00059 < 0.00014

< 0.00055 < 0.00015

< 0.00059 < 0.00004

< 0.00147 0.00206

< 0.00147 0.00383

< 0.00045 0.01999

< 0.00026 < 0.00002

< 0.00026 < 0.00002

< 0.00028 < 0.00002

< 0.00026 < 0.00002

< 0.00028 < 0.00002

< 0.00020 < 0.00001

< 0.00019 < 0.00001

< 0.00020 < 0.00002

< 0.00022 < 0.00001

< 0.00022 < 0.00001

< 0.00017 < 0.00003

< 0.00022 < 0.00001

< 0.00022 < 0.00001

< 0.00026 < 0.00002

0.02411 Concentration, lbldscf

c M,_,. lb

lbld•cf = Vm..,,d,cf X 2.2046x10' 12 ng EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION

RATE RATE RATE RATE

(lblhr) (kglhr) (kg/Mg of Product) (lbfton of Product)

x10 .. x1o·• x10 .. x1o·•

< 0.00554 < 0.00251 < 0.00271 < 0.00542

< 0.00554 < 0.00251 < 0.00271 < 0.00542

< 0.00687 < 0.00312 < 0.00336 < 0.00672

0.01945 0.00882 0.00951 0.01903

< 0.00776 < 0.00352 < 0.00379 < 0.00758

< 0.02038 < 0.00925 < 0.00997 < 0.01994

< 0.02216 < 0.01005 < 0.01083 < 0.02167

< 0.00554 < 0.00251 < 0.00271 < 0.00542

0.30799 0.13970 0.15061 0.30121

0.57388 0.26031 0.28062 0.56125

2.99124 1.35682 1.46271 2.92542

< 0.00244 < 0.00111 < 0.00119 < 0.00238

< 0.00244 < 0.00111 < 0.00119 < 0.00238

< 0.00266 < 0.00121 < 0.00130 < 0.00260

< 0.00244 < 0.00111 < 0.00119 < 0.00238

< 0.00266 < 0.00121 < 0.00130 < 0.00260

< 0.00191 < 0.00086 < 0.00093 < 0.00186

< 0.00175 < 0.00079 < 0.00086 < 0.00171

< 0.00288 < 0.00131 <0.00141 < 0.00282

< 0.00208 < 0.00094 < 0.00102 <0.00204

< 0.00208 < 0.00094 < 0.00102 < 0.00204

<0.00487 < 0.00221 < 0.00238 < 0.00477

< 0.00202 < 0.00091 < 0.00099 < 0.00197

< 0.00202 < 0.00091 < 0.00099 < 0.00197

< 0.00288 < 0.00131 < 0.00141 < 0.00282

3.60773 1.63646 1.76417 3.52834

Emission Rate, lblhr Convert lblhr to kglhr

ERib/hr = clbltb:d X Qllhtd5dh ER -ER **X~**

"' 1 '' - .,"' 2.20461b

Production Based Emission Rates

Emission Rate lblMg Qf **Produ~l** Emission Rate, lblton of Product

_ ER,. 1 .,. 1000kg ER - ERiblhl X 2000 lb

ERkg/Mg<IIP<o<'""- **~xTMg** tbftonffiPr\.'ldOO - PRib/hr 1ton

kglhr

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010 RUN NUMBER: WD1-M23-2
yFACTOR: 0.999 STACK DIAM: 23.750 inches BAROMETRIC: METER VOLUME: 156.765 

# te STATIC PRES: METER TEMP: 98.1 °F STACK TEMP: 29.18 in. Hg -0.050 in.H 2 

## 0

179.1 °f 0.2789 in.H 2 

## 0 1.21 in.H 2 

## 0 LIQUID COLL: 236.0 milliliters SQ.RT AP: C0 2 : 

## 0.00 

# % by volume AH: 0 2 : 

## 20.80 

## % by volume

VOLUME OF SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

V 51 

### d=--xVxy · 

## ( 528 ) 

# [Pbar +

# 1~~] m 29.92 m Tm



## y 

# = 0.999

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS 

## =

Vwstd 

## 0.04707 X 

### VIc 

# =

VIc= 

## 236.0 mL ENGLISH UNITS 

## (29.92 in.Hg 

# & 68 °F)

144.938 dscf

11.109 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED

0.0712

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION 

# [J

8361 -(

# ~~~J]l o.s

MF 

## = p 

## 0.5027

T 

# = 354.7 °K P 

# = 741.1 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS
Bws 

# = 0.0712



# A-73

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: WD1-M23-2 SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 TEST DATE: 8/5/2010

BAROMETRIC: 29.18 in. Hg -0.05 in.H 2 

## 0 179.1 °F STACKDIAM: 23.750 inches STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: 0.2789 in.H 2 

## 0

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS 

## C02: 02:

Md = 0.44(%C0 2 ) 

## + 0.32(%0 2 ) 

## + 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

M 8 

## =Md(1-Bvvs)+18Bvvs

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT
Cp (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

# JAP 

# =-I lAP
n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 179.1 OF+ 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE

Ps P static Pbar + 13.6
STACK GAS VELOCITY

V

5 

### = 

## (85.49)(CP)(avg/AP)

# (Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Qs 60 X 

## Vs xAs

Stack Area= 3.0765 

# tf

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis
(528) (Ps) Qsldw = 

## 29.92 (Qs) Ts
STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis

Qstd

# (~}as{Ps }1 29.92 Ts Bvvs)



# A-74 0.00 

## % by volume 20.80 % by volume



# = 28.83



# = 28.06



# = 0.84



# = 0.2789



# = 639.1



# = 29.18



# = 17.695



# = 3,266.38



# = 2,631.49 157,889.2



# = 2,444.16 146,649.6 lbllb-mole

lbllb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ft/sec

acfm

scfm,wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh

## METHOD 231SOKINETIC CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company 

## LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin



## SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 

## TEST DATE: 8/5/2010 

## RUN NO: WD1-M23-2



## Vm: yfACTOR: 156.765 

## ft 3 

### 0.999 

## Pbar: 

## 11H: Tm: HCI in sample: 29.18 

## in. Hg 1.21 

## in. H 2 

## 0 98.1 

## Of 0.00 

## 1-19

Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis:



# 528 Pbar+- V 

# =(--)xv xy 13.6 

# [ ;1H]

mstd 

# 29.92 m 

# T m



## lsokinetic Sampling Rate 146,650 

## dscfh 179.1 

## Of

240 

## minutes 17.695 

## fps 29.18 

## in. Hg 236.0 

## ml

English Units 

## (29.92 in. Hg, 68 

## °f)



## = 144.938 

## dscf



# = 98.06% 

## I

0.00077519

## ft~ Runtime (e) 

# = 60 minutes



## A-75)>

I

"-...! 0) COMPANY: Kohler Company

Kohler, Wisconsin

Ware Dryer #1

8/5/2010

WD1-M23-2

12:17-16:20 LOCATION: SOURCE:

TEST DATE:

TEST RUN NO. :

TEST TIME: SAMPLE VOLUME :

SAMPLE VOLUME :

GAS FLOW RATE :

OXYGEN CONTENT : DIOXIN I FURAN

COMPOUND 2,3,7,8-TCDD

TotaiTCDD

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD

Total PeCDD

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD

1 ,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD

Total HxCDD

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD

TotaiHpCDD

1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF

Total TCDF

1 ,2,3,7,8 PeCDF

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF

Total PeCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF

2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF

Total HxCDF

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF

Total HpCDF

1,2 3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF

TOTAL 144.938 dscf 4.105 dscm

146,650 dscfh

20.80 % TOTAL ESTIMATED

SAMPLE DETECTION

MASS LIMIT

(nanogram) (nanogram)

< 0.00480 <0.00250

< 0.00250 < 0.00250

< 0.00570 < 0.00190

0.01670 < 0.00190

< 0.00190 < 0.00190

<0.00840 < 0.00210

< 0.00970 < 0.00190

0.02370 < 0.00210

0.07690 < 0.00350

0.14200 < 0.00350

0.71100 <0.00360

< 0.00110 <0.00110

< 0.00110 < 0.00110

< 0.00160 < 0.00160

< 0.00150 < 0.00150

< 0.00160 < 0.00160

< 0.00060 < 0.00060

< 0.00055 < 0.00055

< 0.00068 < 0.00058

< 0.00065 < 0.00065

< 0.00065 < 0.00065

< 0.00170 < 0.00067

< 0.00086 < 0.00086

< 0.00086 < 0.00086

<0.00130 < 0.00130

0.90141 **~icograms** to nanograms

M,. =M **X~**

·"" "·"' 1000 pg Production Rate: STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION

(nanogram!dscm)

BDL < 0.00117

BDL < 0.00061

BDL < 0.00139

ADL 0.00407

BDL < 0.00046

BDL < 0.00205

BDL < 0.00236

ADL 0.00577

ADL 0.01873

ADL 0.03459

ADL 0.17321

BDL < 0.00027

BDL < 0.00027

BDL < 0.00039

BDL < 0.00037

BDL < 0.00039

BDL < 0.00015

BDL < 0.00013

BDL < 0.00014

BDL < 0.00016

BDL < 0.00016

BDL < 0.00041

BDL < 0.00021

BDL < 0.00021

BDL < 0.00032

0.21980 Concentration, ngldscm Mu,ng

cd,ng/dscm = -v.--

mstd.dscrn DIOXINS AND FURANS EMISSIONS SUMMARY 20451blhr

927.6 kglhr DETECTION LIMIT STACK GAS

STACK GAS CONCENTRATION

CONCENTRATION (lb!dscfl

(nanogram/deem) x10' 12

< 0.00061 < 0.00007

< 0.00061 < 0.00004

< 0.00046 < 0.00009

< 0.00046 0.00025

<0.00046 < 0.00003

< 0.00051 < 0.00013

< 0.00046 < 0.00015

< 0.00051 0.00036

< 0.00085 0.00117

< 0.00085 0.00216

< 0.00088 0.01081

< 0.00027 < 0.00002

< 0.00027 < 0.00002

< 0.00039 < 0.00002

< 0.00037 < 0.00002

< 0.00039 < 0.00002

< 0.00015 < 0.00001

< 0.00013 < 0.00001

< 0.00014 < 0.00001

< 0.00016 < 0.00001

< 0.00016 < 0.00001

< 0.00016 < 0.00003

< 0.00021 < 0.00001

< 0.00021 < 0.00001

<0.00032 <0.00002

0.01371 Concentra1ion, lb!dscf

M,,,, lb

c,u,e&et = -- x " vm'"'·''" 2.2046x10" ng EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION

RATE RATE RATE RATE

(lblhr) (kg/hr) (kglMg of Product) (lb!ton of Product)

x1o·• x10' 9 x1o·• x10' 9

< 0.01071 <0.00486 < 0.00524 < 0.01047

< 0.00558 < 0.00253 < 0.00273 < 0.00545

< 0.01271 < 0.00577 < 0.00622 < 0.01243

0.03725 0.01690 0.01822 0.03643

< 0.00424 < 0.00192 < 0.00207 < 0.00414

< 0.01874 < 0.00850 < 0.00916 < 0.01833

< 0.02164 < 0.00981 < 0.01058 < 0.02116

0.05287 0.02398 0.02585 0.05170

0.17154 0.07781 0.08388 0.16776

0.31675 0.14368 0.15489 0.30978

1.58598 0.71940 0.77554 1.55108

< 0.00245 <0.00111 < 0.00120 < 0.00240

< 0.00245 <0.00111 < 0.00120 < 0.00240

< 0.00357 < 0.00162 <0.00175 <0.00349

< 0.00335 < 0.00152 < 0.00164 < 0.00327

< 0.00357 < 0.00162 < 0.00175 < 0.00349

< 0.00134 < 0.00061 < 0.00065 < 0.00131

< 0.00123 < 0.00056 < 0.00060 < 0.00120

< 0.00129 < 0.00059 <0.00063 < 0.00127

< 0.00145 < 0.00066 < 0.00071 < 0.00142

< 0.00145 < 0.00066 < 0.00071 < 0.00142

< 0.00379 < 0.00172 < 0.00185 < 0.00371

< 0.00192 < 0.00087 < 0.00094 < 0.00188

< 0.00192 < 0.00087 < 0.00094 < 0.00188

< 0.00290 < 0.00132 < 0.00142 < 0.00284

2.01072 0.91205 0.98323 1.96647

Emission Rate, lblhr Convert lblhr to kglhr

ER!b/11( = clb1dscf X QlltO,dadh ER -ER, **X~**

"''"'- lhl 2.20461b

Production Based Emission Rates

Emi§!!ign Rate lblMg gf l:rll!:IYS<t Emission Rate lb[!Qn of Product

_ ER,, 11 ., 1000kg ER - ER,, .. X 20001b

**ER,.IMgo!Proo"~** - PR X 1Mg !b/l!)rtciProduct - PRibfhr 1 ton

kglhr

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. MOISTURE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 TEST DATE: 8/6/201 0 RUN NUMBER: WD1-M23-3
yFACTOR: 0.999 BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg STATIC PRES: -0.040 in.H 2 

## 0 STACK TEMP: 177.8 

## °f SQ.RTAP: 0.2858 in.H 2 

## 0 AH: 1.22 in.H 2 

## 0

VOLUME OF SAMPLE STACKDIAM: METER VOLUME: METER TEMP: LIQUID COLL: C02:

02:

@STANDARD CONDITIONS, DRY BASIS

y 

# = 0.999

VOLUME OF WATER IN SAMPLE @STANDARD CONDITIONS 

# =

Vw&d = 

## 0.04707 x V 1 

## c 

# =

V,c 

# = 250.3 

## ml 23.750 inches 156.365 

# te
83.8 °F 250.3 milliliters

0.00% by volume 20.80 % by volume

ENGLISH UNITS 

## (29.92 in.Hg & °F)

148.931 dscf

11.782 scf

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS AS MEASURED

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF STACK GAS@ SATURATION 

# [J8361-(**18**

# ~~)lJ 0. 5

MF= 

## = p 

## T 

# = 354.0 

## OK P 

# = 743.9 mmHg

FRACTIONAL MOISTURE CONTENT USED IN CALCULATIONS 

## Bws = 0.0733

0.4862

0.0733



# A-77

## ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. FLOW RATE CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin RUN NUMBER: WD1-M23-3 SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 TEST DATE: 8/6/2010

BAROMETRIC: 29.29 in. Hg -0.04 in.H 2 

## 0 177.8 °F STACK DIAM: 23.750 inches STATIC PRES: STACK TEMP: SQ.RT AP: 0.2858 in.H 2 

## 0

DRY MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS C0 2 : 

## 02:

Md 

# = 0.44(%C0 2 

## )+ 0.32(%0 2 

## )+ 0.28(%N 2 

## +%CO)

MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS, wet basis

M 5 

# = Md 

# (1- Bws) + 18Bws

PITOT TUBE COEFFICIENT

CP (from calibration curve or geometric specifications)

AVERAGE VELOCITY HEAD OF STACK GAS, in. H 2 

## 0

- 1 n 

## .JAP 

# = - 

# 'L fi.P

n i=1 

## AVERAGE ABSOLUTE STACK GAS TEMPERATURE

Ts= 177.8 °F + 460

ABSOLUTE STACK GAS PRESSURE
p p Pstatic s= 

## bar+-- 13.6 STACK GAS VELOCITY

V 5 

## =(85.49)(Cp)(avg.JAP)

# /(Ps~~s) STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, actual Qs = 60 X 

## Vs xAs

Stack Area= 3.07651f

STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, wet basis

Qstdw

# (~)as{Ps) 29.92 T 5 

## STACK GAS VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, standard conditions, dry basis ( 528 ) (Ps) Qstd = 29.92 (Os) Ts (1 Bws)



# A-78 0.00 % by volume 20.80 

# % by volume



## = 28.83

= 28.04



## = 0.84



## = 0.2858

= 637.8

= 29.29

= 18.088

= 3,338.83

= 2,705.56 162,333.8

= 2,507.22 150,433.3 lbllb-mole

lb/lb-mole

in. H 2 

## 0

OR

in.Hg

ftlsec

acfm

scfm, wb scfh, wb

dscfm dscfh

## METHOD 231SOKINETIC CALCULATION SUMMARY

COMPANY: Kohler Company LOCATION: Kohler, Wisconsin

SOURCE: Ware Dryer #1 TEST DATE: 8/6/2010 RUN NO: WD1-M23-3

INPUT

Vm: 156.365 

## ft 3 

### yFACTOR: 0.999 Pbar: 29.29 AH: 1.22 Tm: 83.8 HCI in sample: 0.00

Volume of Sample at Standard Conditions on a Dry Basis:

lsokinetic Sampling Rate in.Hg in. H 2 

## 0 OF 

## J..L9

0.00077519

## ft~ 150,433 dscfh 177.8 OF

240 minutes 18.088 fps 29.29 in. Hg 250.3 ml

English Units 

## (29.92 in. Hg, 68 °F)



# = 148.931 dscf



# = 98.23% I

Runtime 

### (e) 

# = 60 minutes



## A-79)>

I

00

O COMPANY: Kohler Company

Kohler, Wisconsin

Ware Dryer #1

8/6/2010

WD1-M23-3

07:30- 11:12 LOCATION: SOURCE:

TEST DATE:

TEST RUN NO. :

TEST TIME: SAMPLE VOLUME :

SAMPLE VOLUME :

GAS FLOW RATE:

OXYGEN CONTENT : DIOXIN I FURAN

COMPOUND 2.3,7,8-TCDD

TotaiTCDD

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD

Total PoCDD

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD

TotaiHxCDD

1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD

TotaiHpCDD

1,2,3,4,6,5,7 ,8 OCDD

2,3,7,8-TCDF

TotaiTCDF

1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF

2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF

Total PeCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF

1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF

2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF

Total HxCDF

1 ,2,3,4,6, 7,8 HpCDF

1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF

TotaiHpCDF

1 ,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF

TOTAL 148.931 dscf 4.218 dscm

150.433 dscfh

20.80 % TOTAl ESTIMATED

SAMPLE DETECTION

MASS LIMIT

(nanogram) (nanogram)

< 0.00280 < 0.00280

< 0.00280 < 0.00280

0.00731 < 0.00110

0.02880 < 0.00110

0.00695 < 0.00180

< 0.00710 < 0.00200

0.01800 < 0.00180

0.05410 < 0.00200

0.19200 < 0.00680

0.35200 < 0.00680

2.17000 < 0.00320

< 0.00160 < 0.00160

< 0.00160 < 0.00160

< 0.00200 < 0.00200

< 0.00200 < 0.00200

< 0.00200 < 0.00200

0.00168 < 0.00094

< 0.00086 < 0.00086

< 0.00091 < 0.00091

< 0.00100 < 0.00100

0.00168 < 0.00100

<0.00110 < 0.00110

< 0.00110 < 0.00140

< 0.00140 < 0.00140

< 0.00220 < 0.00097

2.61658 !!icograms to nanQgrams

M, =M **x~**

,,. **~..** 1000pg Production Rate: STACK GAS

CONCENTRATION

(nanogramldscm)

BDL < 0.00066

BDL < 0.00066

ADL 0.00173

ADL 0.00683

ADL 0.00165

BDL < 0.00168

ADL 0.00427

ADL 0.01283

ADL 0.04552

ADL 0.08346

ADL 0.51448

BDL < 0.00038

BDL < 0.00038

BDL < 0.00047

BDL < 0.00047

BDL < 0.00047

ADL 0.00040

BDL < 0.00020

BDL < 0.00022

BDL < 0.00024

ADL 0.00040

BDL < 0.00026

BDL < 0.00026

BDL < 0.00033

BDL < 0.00052

0.62036 Concentration, ng/dscm Mn,ng

cd,ng/d&cm = -v--

mtrtd.d11crn DIOXINS AND FURANS EMISSIONS SUMMARY

2841 lblhr

1289 kglhr DETECTION LIMIT STACK GAS

STACK GAS CONCENTRATION

CONCENTRATION (lb/dscf)

(nanogramldscm) x10" 12

< 0.00066 < 0.00004

< 0.00066 < 0.00004

< 0.00026 0.00011

< 0.00026 0.00043

< 0.00043 0.00010

< 0.00047 < 0.00011

< 0.00043 0.00027

< 0.00047 0.00080

< 0.00161 0.00284

< 0.00161 0.00521

< 0.00076 0.03212

< 0.00038 < 0.00002

< 0.00038 < 0.00002

< 0.00047 < 0.00003

< 0.00047 < 0.00003

< 0.00047 < 0.00003

< 0.00022 0.00002

<0.00020 < 0.00001

< 0.00022 < 0.00001

< 0.00024 < 0.00001

< 0.00024 0.00002

< 0.00026 < 0.00002

< 0.00033 < 0.00002

< 0.00033 < 0.00002

< 0.00023 < 0.00003

0.03873 Concentration, lb/dscf

c M,,,, lb

lb!Qoof = vm .... d ... X 2.2046x10 12 ng EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION EMISSION

RATE RATE RATE RATE

(lblhr) (kglhr) (kg!Mg of Product) (lblton of Product)

x1o·• x1o-> x1o·• x10->

< 0.00624 < 0.00283 < 0.00219 < 0.00439

< 0.00624 < 0.00283 < 0.00219 < 0.00439

0.01628 0.00738 0.00573 0.01146

0.06413 0.02909 0.02257 0.04515

0.01548 0.00702 0.00545 0.01090

< 0.01581 < 0.00717 < 0.00557 <0.01113

0.04008 0.01818 0.01411 0.02822

0.12047 0.05465 0.04240 0.08481

0.42755 0.19394 0.15049 0.30099

0.78385 0.35555 0.27591 0.55181

4.83223 2.19189 1.70089 3.40178

< 0.00356 < 0.00162 < 0.00125 < 0.00251

< 0.00356 < 0.00162 < 0.00125 < 0.00251

< 0.00445 < 0.00202 < 0.00157 < 0.00314

< 0.00445 < 0.00202 < 0.00157 < 0.00314

< 0.00445 < 0.00202 < 0.00157 < 0.00314

0.00374 0.00170 0.00132 0.00263

< 0.00192 < 0.00087 < 0.00067 < 0.00135

< 0.00203 < 0.00092 < 0.00071 < 0.00143

< 0.00223 < 0.00101 < 0.00078 < 0.00157

0.00374 0.00170 0.00132 0.00263

< 0.00245 < 0.00111 < 0.00086 < 0.00172

< 0.00245 <0.00111 < 0.00086 < 0.00172

< 0.00312 < 0.00141 < 0.00110 < 0.00219

< 0.00490 < 0.00222 < 0.00172 < 0.00345

5.82669 2.64297 2.05093 4.10186

Emission Rate, lblhr Convert lb/hr to kglhr

ERfb/hr = Clb,dsct >< Qe.ta.dsdh 1kg
ER.,,,, = ER,.,"' x 2.20461b

Production Based Emission Rates

Emission Rate, lb!Mg of ProdyQt Emission Rate, lf21lon of **Produ~t**

ER _ ER,,,,, 1000kg

kQIMgQfProdur.t- PRkillhr x1MQ ER _ ERM>r X 200Qib !bltoootProour.t - PR!OfiV 1 ton

# -.::::::::==

--- -- 

# _ _......- 

# -- 

# -

__ 

# ._.- 

# -

__ ._._ 

# ----.....- "fff"ENVIRONMENrAL

.. /NO. 

# APPEND liB

899-02 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3-8/6/10 

# Field DataTRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS FOR CIRCULAR AND RECTANGULAR STACKS AND DUCTS

**~~---** ..:;-;:'5""".5 =

---

1 - 15'"5

_ .... INC. Facility }( 17

**~** ltr \J 1

Date 't

- 9

- I 0
Sampling

Location **ff~Y ~~**  G- 0\. LJ

Inside

of Far Wall to g

Outside of Port (Distance C) 2

in.

Inside of Near Wall to Outside of Port (Distance D) in Note: Sketch Stack/Ports/Control Device on Back of Form

Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance (B) =

l Distance B I Stack ID ]

**~** Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance (A) =

l Distance A I Stack ID]

Stack ID (Distance C- Distance D) :2 ':l. in.

Port

Distance Downstream From Disturbance (B) * **in.t!~S-ib** rrof Equivalent Diameter For a'Square or Rectangular Stack=

Port Distance Upstream From Disturbance (A)

**~~S** in. 1 (2 x L x W) I (L + W)]

Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance **~** ';).., 0 (

**~** 2.0 )

Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance (A),...., l.£. <6'1 (

**~** 0.5) Port ID in. (for monorail bracket specs.) Al_ ·I Sampling Ports Dis.turbance

Number of Ports Used L

Traverse Points I Port -1...:a..

Port Length Outside of Stack in. (for monorail bracket specs.)

2 3 4 5 6

Port Fractional Stack Product of Port Traverse Point

Traverse %of· LD. Columns 2 Depth Location From

Point Stack I.D. and 3 Outside of Port

Number (frac. %) (inches) (inches) (inches) (Sum of 4 and 5 in inches)

1 **o.o~**

- 'i,._ **0-~7** 'f y. 6 57 ::: ..).0

2

A· Oil-

**J~ ~**  .J'{ Lf b'

· I '1

3 0

, ( (j' <"'? ') 3. ?f 'f I) • ?<ff **~**

4 ()I ??

**~"J** s. t:G 1-{ 'l, 6'6

5

(j. 'vi.S ')?_ **~.oo**

I.{ fa.oo **~·**

6 f2· )5G

**"'~ lf.~q**  .... IS• 3"{

7 O.b''-1"1 ')'d., 'J..O•b'T

1.-1 ;)_'-(,Of

8 (') '15

**''J~** ':{'-1.00 l{ )_'if ,OD

9 0

**·ch~~** )d- U·

**-~l1** "' r;o.

**·~** '1

10 0 I tt['J, Ja **'J.f.~~** u tj;;t.

**,.~**

11 __{}, C1 f) **3'~ ~"f.**  <G C) tl ]3,$6

12 ()

, v ilf?\ l):;t '3J.:33 V\ 35·13 :; :>5 .o

For

Stacks I Ducts s 24 inches ID

- No traverse point shall be located less than 0.5 inches

from stack

**w~ll**

For Stacks I Ducts > 24 inches ID- No traverse point shall be located less than 1.0 inches

from stack wall QAfQC Check: Completeness __ Accuracy

__ _ i LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN CIRCULAR STACKS

Pill 4 6 e 10 12

1

6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1 •.

2 25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 6.7

3

75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6 11.8

4

93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 17.7

5

85.4 67.7 34.2 25.0

&

95.6 80.6 65.8 35.6

7

89.5 n.4 64.4

8

96.8 85.4 75.0

9

91.8 82.3

10

97.4 88.2

11

93.3

12

97.9 Pill

f 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN RECTANGULAR STACKS

CEMS"

2

3 4 5 6 7 B

25.0

16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3

75.0

50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 21.4 18.8

83.3

62.5 50.0 41.7 35.7 31.3

87.5

70.0 58.3 50.0 438

9().0

75.0 64.3 56.3

91.7

78.6 68.8 92.9

81.3 93.8 9 5.6 16.7 27.8 38.9 50.0 61.1 72.2 83.3

**~** - ----···- _jl4.!_ '

•3 point CEMS RATA nilerse point locations (valid for rectangular and round stacks)

DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE A) DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE A)

' HIGHER NUMSER IS FOR

RECT

ANGIJI.AR STACKS OR OUCTS

24 or 25' STACK DIAMETER> 0.61 m (24ln.)

• FROM POINT OF ANY

TYPE

OF DISTURBANCE lOf--(SEND.

EXPANSION, CONTRACTION. ETC)
STACK DIAMETER= 0.30 TO 0.61 m (12-241n.) 2.5 **~2--~3~--4~~5~~6~~7~~8~~9--~10**

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS ISOKINEnC

TESllNG 5 ' HIGHER NUMBER IS FOR RECTANGULAR

STACK$ OR DUCTS STACK DIAMETER> 0,61 m (24 in.)

' FROM POINT OF ANY TYPE OF DISllJRBANCE

(BEND,

EXPANSION. CONTRACTION, ETC)

16 2.5 **~2~~3--~4--~5~~6~~7~--~B--~9--~10**

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS

FOR

VELOciTY (NOft.ISOKINETIC) TRAVERSES

**~$ \M"'e~5~\jt**  l **\A.Sf~** fV\op(

**~\~.r;·** Form FDF 4000.0\l

# VELOCITY TRAVERSE 

# AND CYCLONIC FLOW VERIFICATION

# ~~~:ioN**-~.:r--;aK._· +:&~tv~0-,**  ------- souRcE () 

# tf**~)6** STACK 10 

# > /L(.) II

## PROBE#/TC#--~~----lr4~L~-------- 

## BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg

# ~ · 

# z_q,**/~** OPERA TORS __.!../\):;,_..:_) 

## -=rJS::::L.I

_______ _ 

## SCHEMA TIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT



# . I

. ,**~~~** RUN NO. ( 

# t/ ( frwl1r -fisT A TIC, in. H20 

# rA 1 () RUN NO.

__ _ STATIC, in.H20

__ _ TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE NUMBER (L\Ps), in.H20 (Ts), °F 0 

## NUMBER (L\Ps), in.H20 (Ts), "F 0 

# to ( 

# ().7AJ 

# rJh /'b t**u~tOt**

## ~L 

# IV J 

# fJ·fl**~** 

# :x /0**~** 

# u ·l?'1 

# t 

# u _a > 0·/Jt? 

# lJ.l 

# L2 b 

# o.o1 1ft. 

# 0 7 

# 0 oZ 

# (rt. C..f 

# 'i, 

# o."r;lj**~~.** 

# ' &'\ 

## (},)!)**~ ~/**  II} 

# {)· IO 

# IIJ /'} 

# I '

. 

# 1>·1'1 

# 911. 

# 1 r'tl 

# fl. 

# Lt**~b** /L) 

# f) 1 

# O·Ov) I 

## ·{J 

# .J
't 

# 0-IJ1 llJ 

# 5**~** 

# O·tN{ ltJ/J 

# 5**~** 

# 0· pvC, r>(1 

# & I 

# fJ",tbf**~[J** 

# b 

# ' 0 rl>'{.; 

# rb 

# vz 1**u~"'~)** 

# t h 4 

# 1-'5 fl 

# 'l. 

# " /.I)**~l** ·!_..; 

# lv /rC.U 

# 3 

# ,, /.0,**~** 

# L/ /IV 

# /'.)**~ ~t**  

# s

.... AVERAGE AVERAGE



# B-2-----------------------iii'1iiF£=FIELDDATAt::>FF:::.k1>-<sfA=__B=__-----PLANTfe-rAMB!ENTTEMPERATUREDATEcg-$-IQBAROMETRICPRESSURELOCATIONi!fASSUMEDMOISTURE.•%f=:-----'-"""'-OPERATORPROBELENGTH,in.STACKNO.-'-t.\NOZZLEDIAMETER,m.V_,,CpFACTORFinalwtiJJ.ffY,FACTORRUNNO.-""STACKDIAMETER,in3'6PITOTNO.SAMPLEBOXNO.A\'el(MINUTESPERPOINTMETERBOXNO.NUMBEROFPOINTSSTARTTIMECL!ll5.NUMBEROFPORTSPltESSlJREDIFFERENTIALk--).vCLOCKTIMETRAVERSEJSAMPLINGPOINTITIME(Hn)NUMBER(e)min.0')15l,.vI0z0"1').0sVf7(o'7lS)iv1h·Y'0....N'O?Hzr').0ICJoIh11<II"""'1i{JJJ'fJJJ';t.)tI''35""{y()lL{.)<695QtOH5_sl'l,'GJGcoAVERAGESTATICPRESSURE(in,H,O)...-o:IIJIACROSSMETERTEMPATEXITSTA'CKVELOCITYORIFICEDRYGASMETERGASTEMPHEADVOLUMEINLETOUTLETTEMP.<Tsl'FI(APs)·(APs)•(Vm)ft3(Tm1n)'F(Tm..,,)'F•FS"aO·b'iIr"JtJ'21t:tre.l'l(),i;iiI3.7LI<gJIbItO,IS().57IICJf.o3l"21Io.06o·i.3[__f7___L2'2La.IQ·6'1Ia.IJI___"16J4"LI__'22.Jd_._di_o_._IL_L_._I'').;t10.IIo ..:.tl.IIY:'?I')<f';a1o,oer0·3:.fIl6iq,;3I8'"6I"l"J'1').o.qcIltf8lo.OIII10,140·55'III?3·'7"\I0,tqtJ.7'1III?'1,.'/0\.I0.:lOo.v'I16'17•.t5II?'-1f'OIo.otlo.oo\JrI16"fq.?SIqyI?'-f.go;tIO·t1J5o.QoI16'15.6'LfI55-CI?5IO·CO'lo.I16qs:oroI.?5"d.I0I0:,0(.o.o:lsI16"erc34II').(;"I0.c:toC}•O'?SIJIg-J.I?C<l'2IO·O.;l'.)in·oqIIq;rI7o0Ji6III?'>_"59-IItE>SILLfI_?7II1)')gst_b'·'J.IIt:'Jdl!_$.5L_L_?'fLh7_ci.£._"\_L___L'lo5·.rcTJ._q_c..L.')7_If"<g6'.oI?o"'•slICfb"I.29.$''a.11·b§'71'h'liL-'l.6':'_L_'2_'i..-.'11'1.j'f_j_-.IL·:_...,e:--VOLUMEORWEIGHTOFUQUIDIIMPINGER--SILICAGELORSATDATACOLLECTEDIVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)FINAL[&QUIDCOLLECTED#I'TOTALUQUIDCOLLECTED(sll""ifymlorg)trl#3WEIGHT114115I_gTIME/Ic(\,,\II"p,TRIALI(11-d__\___ti._'TRIAL2\J\hl"IJlLTRIAL3AverageL/ft\PROBETEMP•F-a{'}_X_!J._r.lll";?-;;u;.I'9-6""1"dc'3Q5"]_J..f>'rCl.S'ff<";)..$''!;;ls-')a5-c-.;;l>fIMPINGERAUXILIARYIOUTLETIPUMPTEMP.TEMP.VACUUM'FI.,;F(in.Bg)':2'3"I(II;.I,_Ift..(IIlFJII'21112.'I"S'oI;Hit?IS"JI9'1tIStIIIs)2al1>2I-:.lcroI1I5'3I:<If'SIS'3I:IrSIS"-1IaJ'ttIli"':g_{j_JC>cII-;;J.o..s-1c->as-cr1IQC'-31S?:1I;?,otISo4(;;*'2>.:rI$'/?1_I6'"'"t;(·rzLEAKCHECKSYSTEMPRE:().OCOfCFM@IS'"HgPOST:0•()COCFM@l5"HgPITOTPRE:1.-r@>J"H,OPOST:{...r-@>J"H20OJ.f..--......,__----_...-_.._.-ENVIRONMENTAL....-/NO.Company:location:Source:RunNo.:lmpingerNo.I2.)t.fNetGainIMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEETJr::v--4;'DateSet-up:c.VItiTestDate:8-r_-foV1S'i2&DateRecovered:9-:£-fc:Jfl3e-Ms=-tUSEPAMethod:£CorrespondingFilterNo:777..?FilterContainerNo:4211?1-MeasurementMethod:atialFinalDifferenceSamplelmpingervoltiiivolContainerContents@ml@nl,§li'hLNo./flt1AI!1"Lt7?Z-5:t:?72h.'I,&'1\f/J+IrJ#"""fHz,Jltt,'f.0{z<'fNH"CR7.J']c?Nit5'Jtt.vCvt(7lt.f.9787./[L."LN1't21'------ --- --- ----- ----- FIELD DATA

--- ____ ... - **·==~= A~**  __ **a~** __

.... **~AL~INC.** PLANT **l{o~** /e. i AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ..,.. **Pteo~** ()r.J **~GA-lt!.**

IV- **~0** > PROBEHEATERSETT!NG ?,. \.{ <{; WEIGHTOFPARTICuUTE,m 1 > I " 1

**~~** • \Qi HEATER BOX SETTING ' '- - -

DATE **~** • '- IO BAROMETRIC PRESSURE

we"'"" 1'5 v• "'""" MO<S<O"<%

OPERATOR PROBE LENGTH, in,

STACK NO. Q- **~** $BE' NOZZLE DIAMETER, in,

RUN NO, frJG--(111 - STACK DIAMETER, in

SAMPLE BOX NO. ' APE)(' MINUTES PER POINT

METER BOX NO,

START TIME 6"o !.II'Jj NUMBER OF POINTS

OE'JO NUMBER OF PORTS

\ "1 METERH<i!l

9) II c, FACTOR Final wt

Q. **~J:S'** Y,FACTOR

3 '). P!TOT NO.

**~-.)** -n::- ' ' y(-:. 1.-l DIFFERENTIAL GAS SAMPLE

PRESSURE

:;;2 ACROSS METER • , TEMP AT

CLOCK

TIME TRAVERS, SAMPLING POINT TIME STATIC I STACK I VELOCITY I ORIFICE **GASSAMPL~** DRYGASMETER

PRESSURE TEMP HEAD (AD) in. H 1 0 VOLUME INLET I OUTLET

(Bn) I NUMBER

l(J7J lrJ I 'l <D1) '3 " !pl{b ) c <6«5 I **~** f{i__o J ___ q

u1 **~7'1** f.lop ' co **lq~n~t** ''

I _ l'J- **1'iotl<l~** !LV j

I I 'l

q t.fh_ I 1

(0 ,, '1 5 " I ..i q lo.. 11

\}. (9) min. (in;H,O) (Ts) 'F (M's) (APs) ACTUAL DESIRED (Vm) ft 3 •

0 ,.()./j() <l"3 I o,oo I I I o.ocf4t I I 'ff?.5o5

q; '3 I O·o rs I I o .a9'1 I I **_"'~? .~.** 

f) 5?'3 ll),ot4 I I o.O!'S I I 21.1M

**ff~** I (').CH I I o .ot1 I I .'1ff, 3·gto 'h3 **lo.o~l** L I o **.o~** I I **'71~.** "'i7

**~** a I ChQV-LI _ I 0. c'S ] J ry l'f-;?,:,Y

IS q;-; **Lo~~s'l_** 1 o.C\l6l _ . L?t'l·o-'2

**-~~__lil** .. 6'-11 I "a· cs 1 1 ?ao.so

':10 <}!.::>.. **l'1:Rs~- L"f·~··~**  I L?::!::t.J''f

7r **~** LL r'f o I **-·~·** • ___., **I6'~~** I I **'fi~_o** [

'ls-_ **~~** J **~~± ?_~oL**  ___ j __ {ffj', **~l**

)o sr J 1 tJ, **r~** J **--To-:~L:I** [ _ _L'l3?, zJ

**~3** I o ._N_j _ [0, ?i__.-1 _ **-·~-i~Si)'l).**

'35' <c- :1 1 o '1 1 ---

**lo-~4** k{ 1 1 ?i.Jo; 2"1

**~** 3 I o-:- 0 S I I **~** , **~o** I I 7tf ,, ''.

ll'o

**~7** IO·Oli?l I <'.I" I I ">Lfl.f')..

'S"3 lo.o;t I I o. tl- I I **'7/.i~.rzq**

45 $ '!? I o .ob' I I o- **~I.\** I I **~'i'3·** qq

5o r> 1 **o.o~** 1 1 **o~** 36' 1 1 !)4Li.)'

**<l~** 0.11'' O,f.t/..( t'JI..f)./6

q;·l. I 0 .r 3 I I o. **J~** I _ . J f'Jtft;._-;..2.

5')

**"0~** 10. iC\, I I **O."J~** _I - - 17"1?.36'

**~~** IO, **~~I** 10·1?.1_ L7l.f(j,fS'.?

(;"o ..-J **~- -l~**  -

**J.14~ (Tm~n)'F**  **~** <:jq "irr 53' a '75'3 g'Lf <CC "6.._{;

__ Cf_'} Cf7 if€.( **~') ~**  rr-a qr qf} q; q, Df:L .!11. "ft.{ o/,> q(; t:t? (Tm.,,)'F 1)0 f{a fi"'CJ

zro j/0 '/'0 <ir'O 73'0 8'0 "ffO e'('J,_ Va. 'i?"S" B"-3 f/3 113> '13 g"LI **~q ~.Y**  <f 5'- ?Y '8'£.!

'WL1 FILTER EXIT

GAS

TEMP.

•F

AVERAGE

**~~~-u~~- u;.~v~** 

-

VOLUME OR WEIGHT **0~** UQUID

COLLECTED IMPINGER VOLUME (ml) OR WEIGHT (g)

Ill 112 I 113 114

FINAL liS SILICA GEL WEIGHT ORSAT DATA TRIAL I TRJAL2 TRJALJ Average l TIME TOTAL CROSS SECTION

LAST

fMPJNGER

PROBE I AUXILIARY I OUTLET I PUMP

TEMP TEMP. TEMP. VACUUM

•F I 'F I 'F

'JS:> I ';;{ 4'1 I **~.**

:JS 3 I 2s .=t I 6't'5

:;lJl:f **T~~.2:~·?** ':25?1 **ar~** 1. 0'?

l'"')j:Q I :lY51-6"?

;J..s*8 L **~,-3** I flf 6'

ats- _2 I ';;).s<:fl 6" 3

?.>? I "J-.5'5 1_6: 4 **~~I** -o..m I S'_l
**~<=c** I ':t 4.:fl 5o

**·~S** I **~** t.[] I .r-3.

'dS? **~** 'ii( **~**
**~I :<.1~**  I O's
**~.>?I ::?t~**  s I fl->4 -

a..rv I :1. q 6' I I?" 3'

'a.>8' I ;;J'j_s 1 6 **~ ~s'>T**  gi.ti.fT03

'as3' I **~** S'-f I o''i

**~~** I **-:~...r'3** I G''S

-Rs5Y I <15 I elfset **~sq.** 6'3

2.s'O **~o'f** 1 o-:z

**~** "::( 6'"5 I 6' I

tl.51? **:t~-** I (;:·;z LEAK CHECK (in. Bg) t I I ) ,, I I .2. 3 'i ,

I I ' I I I

[_J I \

I I
SYSTEM PRE: {JrO:!'C tF CFM@lS"Hg

POST: O.ocJ' \j'""' CFM@tS"Hg PITOTPRE: **.f~** V @>3"H,O

POST: &--'? @>l"H,OIMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEETroIen--------____.......,_---__...--__.._._....___.....__,..ENVIRONMENTAL.....INC.Company:}tohMv"u,DateSet-up:8-4-(t?Location:/:t."h{tyw·r._TestDate:9-S'-tt?Source:If(7..-'fDateRecovered:RunNo.:fll€USEPAMethod:s=CorrespondingFilterNo:FilterContainerNo:qzt?t;.MeasurementMethod:VolumeInitialFinalDifferenceSamplelmpinger@/volContainerlmpingerNo.Contents'gpnlNo.JtOtJlMIHZ:V69P.t?7t75:07.e:JMtr-z..IrlrJJ11-CJ670.71.{:711/lr)l?eytff''·z..l·)Nrr45;'f,<c&fC-.e.L799.$72-Nit2tJ.2.NetGain('---- --- --- ----- ----- ---

...........

-----

**.....-~** .... 1/W). PLANT Kohler AMBIENTTEMPERATURE

DATE **<fi~** 5- {O BAROMETRlCPRESSURE

LOCA noN Kch 1i 1 W'l ASSUMED MOISTURE,%

OPERATOR [ L PROBE LENGTH, in.

STACK NO. a 11i!'i;. NOZZLE DIAMETER, in.

RUN NO. ${Je - 3 STACK DIAMETER, in.

SAMPLE BOX NO. A ffX MINUTES PER POINT

METER BOX NO. 60£.1 I') J' NlJMBER OF POINTS

START TIME 1o:,20 NlJMBER OF PORTS

CWCK TRAVERSE SAMPLING STATIC SUCK

TIME POINT TIME PRESSURE TEMP

(Hn) NUMBER (Et) min. {in, H,O) (Ts) '.F

I o 'Jr) w-1 '0 -/70 't7

1.. 'b?

3 ) f{J

u 'l?J

s lo 'ir?

.. <{3

I {) <67

l1J $'7

**~0** 6';;t

(J <j?::t

{{ 'J-) <lOl

I f'L 'PL

J{()bf ( 1111 IJJ 3o 't'}

v 'z. 23

2, '3) **lb~**

" !?3

1.{Q !?7

11 s-?

7 45 &3

r., **~;,**

5'0 **~}**

IJ g'J..

/( S) CO:l

jJ"1£ Ill/ '?'l..

f:,O -

( I""

AVERAGE **<6~-by**

VOLUME OR WEIGRT OF LIQUID IMPINGER FIELD DATA

,......,..f05 PROBEHEATERSETTING

**~'1.t'i** "C METER **H,~**

\.{1)'' 1 CpFACTOR **Q=~$"$** Y, FACTOR

'} PITOTNO.

**·~:;5 R.~**  t{,'

i'J.. PRESSURE

"";j.. DIFFERENTIAL ACROSS METER

VEWCIT\' ORIFICE 6ASSAMPLE

HEAD (AH)in.H 1 0 VOLUME

(APs) (APs) ACTUAL DESIRED (Vm) ft 3

0,?-"A **~-lr$** ?S0.3'd-S

t)' l't ('),');z '75 i. 'ii 0

CJ./'7 0 -O:'lf '75'Li?

**0·0~** (JI. 7'#-... **'f>~·SI**

o.ot..{ (!), t6 t'])T,tj'),

O·O '; 0· 1 R ?Sb· '6>

a.ol.( o.Jo **'tsr'J,~~>I**

tJ· 15 **f)~f-;;.** 1) S'<it • ';;l<n

0• /'if cg.f);;l_

**"~,'55**

o.;;.l

**Cl·~Lf** '7()). '11

0. (g' () '?d- 76:1-.! **~**

('), **~~** (). ')Cl 1(6"3·"10

O·C<:>I **1.9-!!0~\** r-z 6'1-\. ') lj

() .coL( o.o),C 7CS so J.

o.o 66' .l'LA.

. (},()'). 765.·10

**~·01** o.oY 7(;'f,f't

!).of> 0· (J£' **~C>·'I6'**

O·Oa I{ o.lo '-"lsr;. ;q

(J.;!.f f.e '"J&? tO J

0•'?;)..

**~·4 '76<f,o~** 

I· Jf f.S ')I)<J. .J5

f.f't..{ b-'7 ?I')S, **~I**

, .. 'ig ?·? **1[?~.1']~**

l·'ir) ?-C "18''3, (; **~**

- -- '7'1f?, 5;1._2.

**~~L/JJ}** J( **~~** v ( **~?.Jo~**

SILICA GEL ORSAT

COLLECTED VOLUME (ml) OR WEIGHT (g) WEIGHT DATA

#1 #1. #3 114 115 TRIAL I

FINAL TRIALl

**~~IAL** TRIALJ

LIQUID COLLECTED ...,.----. Avera11e

• **A~** __ **B~** __

WEIGHT OF PARTICuuTE. m

:l crol TOTAL .......... **~~**

**"~51**

CROSS SEcnON

GASSA:MPLE FILTER LAST

TEMP AT EXIT IMPINGER

DR\' GAS METER GAS PROBE AUXILIARY OUTLET PUMP

INLET OUTLET TEMP. TEMP TEMP. TEMP. VACUUM

(Tm,.)'F (Tm •• ,) 'F •F "F 'F 'F (in. Bg)

« 'l'6' ?. )'-/ Qsr Cf? I

ff **~6'** a><6 ';;) S" '8' 66' r

"!tJ '17 ":)_ .)'"/ ;:(5'$" CG" I

q-:z. etc **~.S"'$** ";;l.s-4 cc I

**OJ~ ~~**  <)..5'? 'i}.S'F cr I

q·'3 (j"')_ **~.5'?** 2-f'.F cs ,

t'J'} <l? ;l..)J' :;L.r.r C.s I

t.{ 'iltt b:1->? ':<if::'$' 0'_7_ l

"> '?''? O!SC/

**~oo/** 6''3 '

'! <i'6' ;u·; ':<« 5""j I

'1.C g? **~.>&"** ;;(G-_.S scr \

'16 '?9' 25'8' ::<.e'f e-o I

CJ'7 Vo **?.5'~**

**~..>¢'** C'l 1

ql.{ **~6** Ol.SlJ' a.YL{ (i;\( I

!-(J '!fi =<.so: ;;U''i I:'J I

**~~** .;rC **~.55'** .;<.c? 1{'7 I

q l <6'? ::zJ.>' ;(6'"« Clf I

cp .. 'i? :;;?.S? (XCI _(:f r

Cf'3 '71? :;J..>_f' r;tscr Cc.f l

"l5 <il d..r-( O<.F'7 ('t...f t **~**

I"O n ::;( ))" ;;u:' :> >IJ' 6'

t 0 'J., g't :::2.>3 ::?.,5'7 6t:z 0

/Ol <&-lr d...SQ **:;;t__~** b'".)' fS

lo1 g-q 85''3 aC<? 6'') 'F

**_;)~ ~--'""'**  orP")- ) __ \\v LEAKCRECK

TIME ,co, \ ••• ,,/1 **~** SYSTEM PRE: CFM@JS"Hg

v 1\\ IV I 9 POST: CFM@IS"Hg

JS _0--b I A

v v PITOTPRE: @>3"1110 I

POST: @>3"11,0IMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEETIllI00-------_.__.__._----__.....--------...--....-.,.ENVIRONMENTAL...../NO.Company:Kot-zItt/(..P,DateSet-up:9-f-10'Location:wrTestDate:&J-'5-ft?Source:1}?-rt.ffOEDateRecovered:E!-s-rc?RunNo.:51}7::-1Mr.:::JUSEPAMethod:>CorrespondingFilterNo:77)7FilterContainerNo:MeasurementMethod:VolumelmpingerNo.6EJtialISamplelmpingervolvolvolContainerContentst1)HnLNo.ffz.Cl71{;."'72".a3_!il42flz_0t,{,t../.(/"7t7.),_7A/It36t:Yi3NlltlfC-eL77).77BS:7/0.0ri1f,e,gNetGain(jJlJ)

# STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT FIELD DATA

COMPANY: LOCATION: SOURCE: TEST DATE:

Field Orsat Measurements

Run:**~JJ£** 

# .... ,., S- J 

# Run Oock Time: Analysis Oock Time:

PARAMETER #1 

# Carbon dioxide 

# 01 Oxygen 

# za? Nitrogen (by difference)

Run: 

# S JJ]ft-jfS" -?r Run Clock Time: Analysis Oock Time:

PARAMETER #1 

# Carbon dioxide 

# c?.! Oxygen 

# 2£1/ 

# '1 Nitrogen (by difference)

Run:

# ~1313--M;-- 

# 3 Run Clbck Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 

# Carbon dioxide

# ~I Oxygen 2f}, 

# 7 Nitrogen (by difference)

!iTKGSWT.OOC 

### tm 

# #2 

# t1,(} 

# 2A2f1

#2 

# fl. 

# I 

# W7

#2 

# (J.f 2-4f3 #3 

# tl. 

# I 

# Vl.7'

#3 

# (2{ 

# 2.42'7

#3 

# 620 

# '2.L1r7 Average

# ~~ 

# 2/tlt)

Average 

# t?t/ Zt:l-7'**Avera~e**



# o.f 

# zo_ 7

B-9=--;=..:;:;5

TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS FOR CIRCULAR AND RECTANGULAR STACKS AND DUCTS

--- tiL'! FaciRcy lr!r **~**

**~ate ~**  l c$ampling Location j n 1.- 1 f(r-f1 Pt7L

Inside of Far Wall to • "

Outside

of Port (Distance C)

**'tl~,** S

in.

Inside of Near Wall to Outside of Port (Distance D) G. JS

in

Stack ID (Distance C- Distance D)

**~~** J!:.

in.

Port Distance Downstream From Disturbance (B) U +n **~** • in.7J..

**rtf)~**

Port Distance Upstream From Disturbance (A)

**-"-~4<:2** in.

Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance (B)

**~ ~.**  (;::: 2.0)

Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance (A) ta. (;::: 0.5 )

1\l ... nhor of Ports Used

_ **~** Traverse Points I **Port~**

2 3 4 5 6 Note: Sketch Stack/Ports/Control Device on Back of Form

Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance (8) =

[

Distance 81 Stack ID J
Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance tlll =

[

Distance A I Stack ID }

Port Diameter For a Square or Rectangular Stack =

[

(2 x l X W) I (l + W) } mf\nnr<>il bracket specs.) ___ in. (for monorail bracket specs.) ·T ·T Sampling Ports Disturbance

Port Traverse Point Number Fractional %of· Stack I.D. (frac. Stack I.D. Product of Columns 2 and 3 (inches) Port Depth Traverse Point location From Outside of Port LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN CIRCULAR STACKS LOCAllON Of TRAVERSE POINTS IN RECTANGULAR STACKS

(inches) **~ '3>5,5:..~-** 

2 t:. i

l

3 **rr.~**

4 11 ,·7 **\9~** 1'1 l. **·~** c;. 'iJ (t\

-

(.., \'l. "if (inches) (Sum of 4 and 5 in inches) -------·-r··- ' "' ---:----c-

c, .l.E> **~.'tl_ r,.a,.~**  1..JS **~.(n"'"l lC?~'il**  **li~'f** Pill 4 6 8 10

1

6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6

2

25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2

3

75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6

4

93.3 70.4 32,3 22.6

5

85.4 67.7 34.2

6

95.6 80.6 65.8

7

89.5 77.4

8

96.8 85.4

9

91.8 ,.. CEMS'

-

}2 2.1 Pis 2 3 4 5 6 7 a 9

f

25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3 5.6

6.7

2 75.0 50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 21.4 18.8 16.7

Jl1.8 17.7

3 83.3 62.5 50.0 41.7 35.7 31.3 27.8

4

87.5 "70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8 38.9

{25.0 5 90.0 75.0 64.3 56.3 50.0

1 35.6 6 91.7 78.6 68.8 61.1

64.4 7 92.9 81.3 72.2

75.0 8 93.6 83.3

82.3 9 94.4

**-··~** ---1

5 **t~d9'**

**:l-~:C? ~I**  **t.L.~;s**

**~~d;..** 10 97.4 88.2 *3 point CEMS RATA traverse point locations (\lalid for rectangular and round stacks)

6 I

t

**~. ~(')**  11 93.3

7 Gtc **~~** 11.1o l **-i~.** 't.5.

12 **~** 97.9

8 l(.n 17 lfb. "'it w **-:>l.~'f**

9 &J.13 l Lt:t,o I 3'5, l.£a OUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE A)

10 o'b,j_ **·~1**

tC'"t 3/ijif

11 **Q1~1** 5I,%9 '311 iLf

12 q7,, **~'1.!)f i.Jo~7c,M)**  **40~!>** ' HIGHER NUMBER IS FOR RECTANGUlAR

STACKS OR DUCTS

For Stacks I Ducts::;; 24 inches ID- No traverse point shall be located less than 0.5 inches

from stack wall

For Stacks I Ducts > 24 inches ID- No traverse point shall be located less than 1.0 inches

from stack wall QAIQC Check: Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications

__

Wle\ncd **~** Ca\cu\a\or Signa\urelmfte **Cl~A.J** \LJ

Qv % [ }/

t D

Field Supervisor Signature/Date t::£ **~ ~-**  Zr- ttl

t **~+I)(.\<...** CA

i\ ·h -'

ue) be lo

LJ **~~** 24 or 25'

' FROM POINT OF ANY
TYPE

OF DISTURBANCE lOt-(BEND,

EXPANSION, CONTRACTION, ETC)
STACK DIAMETER = 0.30 TO 0.61 m (12·241n.)

DUCT DlAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE" (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS ISOKJIIE11C

TU11NG

bu_\ iL.. \\'I\

{1M t"'.(.I,!"'A hir}

, **O..(,@J.~** PIJCTDIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW PISTURBAHCE' (DISTANCE A)

**5~** • HIGHER NUMBER IS FOR RECTANGUlAR

STACKS OR DUCTS STACK DIAMETER> 0.61 m (241n) 2.5 **--~s---i4--~s--~s~~7~--~s--~9---1~o**

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM

NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS

FOR VELOCITY

**(NOH~SOKllfE1lC)** TRAVERSES

**tvt~ ~l"''i**  {)+1 Form FDF 4000.00-------------------------____...--__,_,_-----.FIELDDATAA=____PLANTDATELOCATIONOPJ;RATORS'I'ACKNO.RUNNO.WEiGHTOFPARTICuLATE,m••-.,,,.AMBIENTTEMPERATUREPROBEHEATERSETTINGLJ-L-·__BAROMETRICPREssuRE'lPI;'VjHEATERaoxsETTINGI'·FHterNo.lI...p...,..,.;-::,:;=---.<-='-'---ASSUMEDMOISTURE,%__/,{;!jJ_.Sample'_I.PROBELENGTH,in.%If,;''CpFACTOR..FinalWI_DIAMETER,in__!_]'?iJYdFACTOR""-DIAMETER,in..•'PITOTNO.METERBOXNO..STARTTIMEPERPOINTCl•_...,..""""'""-'-_NUMBERoFPOINTs/fl.PREssuREk/v-7-1-C!f---NUMBEROFPORTS•'Z,..DIFFERENTIALGASSAMPLEF1LTERI"'{.1:}/.JLASTTOTAL·CROSSSECTIONACROSSMETERTEMPATEXITf/'lrIMPINGERCLOCKITRAVERS,SAMPLING.ORIFICEGASSA_.MPLEDRY·G·A-SMETERGASPROBEOUTLETIPUMP'TIMEPOINTTIME(All)ln.H10VOLUMEINLETOUTLETTEMP.TEMPTEMP.TEMP.VACUUM(Hn)•NUMBER(e)min.(.1Ps)ACTUALDESIRED___.(VmJft1(Tmu.)'F_(Tm.,.,)'F•F•F'F'F(in.Hg)ItttIzr'/IIIf,..>-z.1/uI-IL'tc..,;l-1·1.'-1II7!iI12-wI'ZY6.I("t,I£/'-"II·rl.rt:JJ_I4'212-lll·lJII2YIltRz.;;IILl'.r6I'?"z..c;1J>2_l___-1-ICfli.?AI'07I12.5¥.1Zl/J."I-s"'JIIz.....o2!toII'-1'1II'A'/IVrJot;:ClIIZf6Jf'-l/T7.l/Iz-ob.I&_IIYtJIZ_.f/IIIZS7.II>IIz;.IZ,......;><>1'&.>II'-A">IIJ.llIvo;q,tJ->.....1IllJI</ltx"7IJ-'1·c-313•-->17tiJ11<.;t;z..VJ.llf1llr1llt>tl?>T11t'$$'lzr-71t.t;·1-2-'75·--I..I·1f;7uIIt.r2...-llr7i"rt:Iz,.o·-c..;zx---·:3--c,--I"U11vI-I:12.40,Il.:r"'IIl-o1l</Ilt()II.t.J"'S'L-10.1IIr1z,I·(//It1i....Il..z2qIzs-zI77I6.3I.:Z..&.>t.i;'/uIllfYJ10./2-T____'"l_.JJIliJ¥IZ>7I1/.''Z.--,)IIII'17·J2lQ1'5lif.-urT7i11.-lt7XbICJ,II'/.t./I1/JCI2,/01tf1'n-IZ1'c:.J_1·L.>)I/'r!VIll./1310tJIl/1bIZJ1/ot>Il2tc7lli'LI1.?..o"ul1'111II<VtYld·1$"I1/::[l[)ol'II-T6S"n.$..;111L__I'.L'i_L___17!C12..o111I;JtJIIr:x1t7!t/?.;;vIIZ.5(;l?.rJ1"/'9'_l6b------L-z...o.hItU'--L"--••[.gzt,:._!tl·LZ_______IL'1I1\V.YiJlt.Lh6lz-().h.l-z.;6II1'/,tIXrl:;:;.50IJO'fIlzrz:·rzrVIi75----rlbTZ.I)1/J<i'it'11JII..I__LI.:.---.1.,.Vtl!l0.2:JJJ1/"_l\(T;6o,til:JqtJ'dAVERAGEI\,OJLEAKCHECKORSATSILICAGELVOLUMEORWEIG8TLIQUIDCOLLECI'EDIll112113114liSSYSTEMPRE:CFM@IS"Hgl.POST:,()JJCFM@IS"Hg!nME1J'\ft•LfJ;IA,..,vWEIGHTDATA__g__TRIALIc;siNAL:rrriALLIQUIDCOLLECI'EDTOTALLI(LUIJ)COL.l.ECI'ED(spe<:ifymlorg)'----TRIAL2\(JiJ\..1(/lw"!TRIALJvAveragePITOTPRE:I)JIC,POST:--;Jil}@>3"H0l.@>3"H20[OJI.....1'-.:1---.....,.____- -_....._-_...__"EIIIVIRDIIIMFIIITAL......INC.Company:Location:Source:RunNo.:lmpingerNo.I2..)lf(NetGainIMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEETlfct,/e./Lt1.f1ttzh.l<...../Vtl:r-IX-I4'yO<_'1tfl"l··:,i,z,}-IDateSet-up:TestDate:DateRecovered:USEPAMethod:CorrespondingFilterNo:PillerContainerNo:MeasurementMethod:VolumeJ.allmpingervolvolContents(g1inL){,]_,y601.}ff}OV'1JHL072'0.(/7tltf.IIOrJ"""fH2,;07t?'Z_7f..v;r!.lll5"f!7.7IIfltf>.t:?{;{t-e,Cel76"-68-2-{CJfg->-!C?tf-'">-Ic:::::>23D<11>7bt.-'-Difference6t}vol(91mLZJ3.7-2.3.1l'-99-'13'1,Lfc£z·DSampleContainerNo.Nl'r_jy__J4-'NJ4_jy_/k-----------------------FIELDDATA;;::::;;;---;;___,_,__.....-PLAN1'DATE1..01()BAROMETRICPRESSURELOCATION/jASSUMEDMOISTURE,%OPERATOR'JPROBELENGTH,in.STACKNO.NOZZLEDIAMETER,in.RUNNO.7/-z_J_,.z:;STACKDIAMETER,in.SAMPLEBOXNO..MINUTESPERPOfNTMETERBOXNO.STARTTIMENUMBEROFPOfNTSNUMBEROFPORTS......CLOCKTRAVERSE!SAMPLING!STATICSTACK••...,,PROBEHEATERSETTfNG"""'"••'C,FACTORfj_,.,,""""-,'P!TOTNO'tVELOCITYPRESSUREDIFFERENTIALACROSSMETERORIFICEWEIGHTOFPARTICULATE..;.Wt.:I!SinGASSAMPLETEMPATDR\'GASMETERIVOLUMEINLETIOUTLETF1LTEREXITGASTEMP.TOTALPROBETEMPTEMP.A=__B=__CROSSSECTIONLASTIMPINGER.OUTLETTEMP.TIME(Bn).LPOINTITIMEPRESSUREITEMPIHEADI(All)in.H,O(in;H,O)(Ts)'.F(Al's)·I(APs)ACTUALlDESIREDNUMBERI(S)min._(Vm)fl3I(Tmu.}'FI(Tm00,)'F'F'FI'F'FPUMPVACUUM(in.Bg)iv'fL:I/UJtJIzp__1j_IJu11I'-t·u..,I51>'tfhI__b!J.'viitriO.:;:7_1qp_(.,IJfJ.;-'_11--Ll!lt?/fl}f/1.151)1>121/Zt()Illt!)IJCt.o0l/f71Iko1lnv&I/W4I!'Jt!J'Lj_ltw_ll2./ulIMDLz;QYlKl;VrJIAVERAGEVOLUMEOltWEIGHTOFLIQUIDICOLLECTED1LIQUIDCOLLECTEDIll.,tJ._nI:---zzr3ct-'5110·11_Il..111}1.If,Y:.t.;)Jro11r..11"ki2t:EJ7J,0_l_]-_JZI'-15?10·J\_I_JQZLl._____-1_'1I_____ll_itdbS__Io.rlflL(t,ll3.10;<..JIV.LiflJ10·l'lJIIJ,{1:'_ifr.:.l'(l:t:l':l'L.IV£3----L.·__l'lrz.;l_.7:::P?_·---10-J··--,l..J'L___--.L:___::LLjl.{'J..10-l?"_L____j__jL'I</'l3IO-i)II-1tz:791lof...Jr?J"ti.:fif-lo.tl.f1-,z./t.t1A!(},/'-/IIA'-ll/1lo.-tt../I111"l.J1J'lO·IJIIt·yl./'?aIo.,lt,I11,..19'?JJ!Orll.=--:1[/-,3(flr£4'..___IMPINGERVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)SILICAGELWEIGHT#l1!13114liSgTOTALLI_QI.Jll)_t::(>I..LECTED(specifymlorg)IJCf7,I/Otf1/Vt.troI,/j'"J.,fill1/l)'-iV(d},21I/0':11/6'2•12/brzJfl!.1'IT271Z'Ittldl£ll/0lffiJ)_JJQ__I/tL.r:.c..-·.,.ll-_.63_L!..'.:t)t.,r,r,;,_ti.c.'.1J.l!:...'-.JJL.___l_Lf..LL·Lc't.>9-12_1La2ILL6..-l'-IJ'/07-·(1.f..2t>__l.LOSA23o;zClltzYJ,tso·tt)jl!Jt.1Zb6zcq.6tIIo-f'Z7Z.!?I7cJC/<6tgI/o4f2.SLJI'/d'/I7Cf-z.IL'iI/t..>\.7;g12t>11'7...'1IZ>Z.2sl./lz$7'2VIlL,o/6ZITeS''l'tZ6lz..5JzJ'YZJ.j"tG2-.3''llL70t.}/1,2lJ"J'Z'$'1-'3li--1ORSAT1"DATATIME..Leo,1\\li'ilTRIALIhtfL_\_TRIAL2c:;1>rl,)!\Iqc,t::.$6..Il:.ft;/Z)6Iqy<:.\"FI"/6t:r-6Io/f141Z.Ll?Iij"JZV6I5ozrD1t;J1/e-rr'1.2.75rzJIL/1!''1.z,-z....IIf!)Z-rlISoZYI1-¥?25"1/Ili?7Iqz..-t:_;;r)lZ.f't.Iqqz.,-315Jt:53Is-'5b-766'6J.'b"6cP_b&5t.:>1£?166.l4blt6b5_Z<l''l/.fb)1£6LEAKCfi.ECK"l.,..)ZAJj_,o3-0-s..(il.J.A"'CJ],(.)]-t/3·//!%-.,.)2,0J--o3..-42-02r&)Z.t.>Z..v(..)z.vl...uSYSTEMCFM@IS"HgPOST:•Ct..vJCFM@IS"HgTRIAL31/J\vr"ILJI/PITOTPRE:OJ.c.@>J"H20@>3"8,0Aver•g•"IPOST:cJe..vuOJI.....------------...-.-- ---__.__.,.,ENVIRONMENTAL......INC.Company:Location:Source:RunNo.:lmpingerNo.Iz?'i/)NetGainIMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEET/11MI(,/'w.DateSet-up:B-J-tt?fl..t?l1Lt&?t/7wrTestDate:6/-}-tc:?-nr-1(!11c..DateRecovered:,-J-tt?11:fIt-1<'12l_-"2.-USEPAMethod:CorrespondingFilterNo:FilterContainerNo:L4IJ"?-"':/_MeasurementMethod:VolumeInitiala,alDifferenceSamplelmpingeraiifvolvoldlfti'volContainerContents(91rnLdjlinltgt.rnLNo.'??t:?.L61/2-.7'2L,C,__!:/_"I717.>Nlf/IJ(lA/tf2-c;;1713.'--'-{,JHz.O7t?9.'}7t?S:'/-J..7Jfllt¥v(,3/,t5?'39.("t.7N14--/f:1/c.e,C.t!Ierz.:;8?1,tB37.s-fJJi---·------..---_,...._--·-------------.....-:.=....NO.PLANThIJrAMBIENTTEMPERATUREDATEd.BAROMETRICPRESSURELOCATION=1£v/ASSUMEDMOISTURE,%OPERATOR'PROBELENGTH,in.STACKNO.1:GNOZZLEDIAMETER,in.RUNNO."JSTACKDIAMETER,in.SAMPLEBOXNO../J:7.?j,MINUTESPERPOINT::::11&!_METERBOXNO.STARTTIMECLOCKTIME(Bn)1-'LJTRAVERS,SAMPLINGPOINTTIMENUMBER(6)min.)70"'t-[J-rr·v(III5)1IC.t<J(,I5.>TfbJe111)C,l'tSp'U]II)111-1Jlvlf'{ofq7}I(II/to-tIi"»TTNo1\1IJ')O"JI1/IJ'I/'11)'1?w'WV1\)L/UIIt:uJ11TT'('l;A"'\,)NUMBEROFPOINTSNUMBEROFPORTSSTATICPRESSURE(in•H,O)-"'VrtilfiSTACKTEMP(Ts)'F41,1-z:tq]'r;;pjl.jQ'I?f[jJ"'1'-/t.>i.j(/-z...,L/t../"7.4<1'1'!tit>l:;l../1(..;<;LJL/),·z;-s1.-L(<)'!JL..--;<:iJ(/'t..i9_;qr..;v,Ljq{f../L17FIELDDATAA''___B=PROBEHEATERSETTrNGwiwHTZ,l),SHEATERBOXSETTrN(),1tCMETERH@/6,11I•III'l,'f;.CI''C,FACTORAItl.I-·'0•j2tfY•FACTOR7B-z..{PITOTNO.J"l..2-VELOCITYBEAD(APs)·(APs}()'I';Q.jll(f.j"'TT5rf5.7)ln-1ilfl-/3rJ,IIlo,ll1(}./1...10-111/J-J/j"tJ.Jlw.;5lo.J3O.is0,jj0·11.--0'11rJ.T!V·/l,lo./1leJ71-PRESSUREDIFFERENTIALACROSSMETERORIFICE(AH)in.H10ACTUALIDESIREDP:.l.T.IJ.l)!lJ:q7'/r,q1:/.Y1.4...J.[_;.3/.'-."l:llj"Z.,I<-/IV.IIY·If'-/II';'/.'Z.j.3j.t_J.ZTarewt:Wt:gain]t::/1)·1.GASSAMPLEGASSAMPLEVOLUMEOUTLET(Vm)f't3•(Tmo.r)'FI7'lll/1I'Jt:h1'7/£'IZ..I2.4..5()TJI.i:J6I"J'?.6z....1gsVlt.f.,Z£·11fl·7oI'/;_'/13>1-J.Jl_Lf/_lll?t;;:qz.,I1'10·UI"&s"l'lf..t6ICJfIlbb?fPJ.1"71rrf-..I·'iJIP.l.woz.fr1B?l'ltJ'?.loIf)'tJLijfS,ifLIl!tt.ZiiI271_I•Vzq.z.IIW1IYJ5,3.It:tr>'f..ll/Z.CJ6Iqb<./Vt;.-1o1ctz1'1:5:9,'lS.ITOTALFILTEREXITGASIPROBEIAUXILIARYTEMP.TEMPTEMP.•F•F'FZ'{1I'2-<it.I'V(I2-16Ii-/12.l;y-·I1.11I962rl-1Zf'lIt/S'-t1ZIi>.;l.z.;7Zf'(;.lt'f7I5Vc:'IIIzrgI59t.Y&IZ5?I5Z.tvtt-Ttf7-l.5.3'234.IZ5"6If6JVl11;::;:-07rTl.Z?l-IZ/Jz.62IZ-rtiIi./Z.lt£lrt19.I<'/vl&..fIlSiI;::.JJ-1271UoIZ)'6TV/t:.'NIZ'f/I'?9zrz..12')6z5o-I!.IzVi-1z->"T.Iif.loZZitJIZf'·/I·CROSSSECTIONLASTIMPINGEROUTLETTEMP.'Fif5t./S'"'<;""50}6ut/t.6:J6-z..66£so'Y6-iICsA-Y7l:?;(/£6Zt'?:376I,;JhZtVPUMPVACUUM(in.Hg)ZoZr.:>Z.oz.o<=:·(!)Zn)-z,i)2'·...>Z.c>/.0Z.-olz.v-z..17.0.rz:.ot.a'j.(.)z.c.,i.Zu'z..,...>z...,.Ic.c)AVERAGED{f;.?t])rT1(r.toVOLUMEORWEIGHTLIQUIDCOLLECTEDIlltALmALQUIDCOLLECTED-IMPINGERVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)1121#3114TOTALUOUIDCOLLECTED(•pec:ifymlorIll1#5SILICAGELWEIGHTll-/tt;iJpDORSAT1'\\/-DATATIME71\f_(ii,\11JS,TRIALI'II"'FO\IITRIALlVIII1..2TJUAL3117}1Average'1:LEA!{CHECKSYSTEMPRE:lJ'riJ)i)CFM@lS"HgPOST:a(}.;!.9_CFM@IS"HgPITOTPRE:CJj(POST:/i//-v@>J"H20@>3"8,0/..OJ

I ....... (j) - - - - **~--** -- ----...---

- -

-

- ---.. -

- __ .._._ -...-- ..... - "Y""'ENVIRONMENTAL ....-INC. Company: Location: Source: Run No.: lmpinger No.

I 2. '} '-{ - 5 Net Gain IMPINGER RECOVERY DATA SHEET

/11711 J.e .,. c

t{?. Date Set-up: e...-J-l</

**11,;t-.7~,.,** wr Test Date: f!i--<f-(0

Trr-ltJ. 'ppc_ Date Recovered: B-'t-tc:7

111 tf- P1 z}

**~** "} USEPA Method: 2} Corresponding Filter No: Nl+

Filter Container No: **i-t!JJ;'i~'-J**

Measurement Method: **~rVolume**

Initial Final Difference Sample

lmpinger **~vol ~ol**  &J.!.vol Container

Contents **,~L ~L**  **~:gzinl** No.

**&~y** 363.1 6t?'-.e **~'{Z~'f** _lj_vt

**/~0** AI fh.JJ 7tl&,.r.f 70/.1 -t{S' It! A-

**L(JtJ~l** Jhf:/ 7'15-s- ?;;t..f, 7 C-.2 _JJ_14-

&yry (:, 317. **~** C.3"J.7 11 li_Jt

5/licq t-el

76J.tf g/5",) J/-; W11- GZ)

# STACKGASMOLECULARWEIGHTFIELDDATA

COMPANY: LOCATION: SOURCE: TEST DATE:

Fie.ld Orsat Measurements

Run: 

# 'ftrlt;j»c -r#l

# ~3- 

# J Run Oock Time: Analysis Oock Time:

PARAMETER #1

. #2 

# Carbon dioxide

# '}....~ 

# Z,'J Oxygen 

# lb·'/ 

# ti.J Nitrogen (by difference)

# Run:1hJC!rt1v/II"!~J...- 

# t.. Run Clock Time: Analysis Qock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# 2.Z. 

# 2.lj Oxygen 

# /6, 2, 

# /b.j Nitrogen (by difference)

. Run: 

# 1fttlf/)tJC-Pt'LJ--) Run Obck Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# b•S 

# 2.,7 Oxygen

# /6~1 lb. 

# z Nitrogen (by difference)

STKGSWT.DOC lftl 

# #3 

# z..</ 16)

#3

# ~~

# ~~~3

#3

# z.s16 2 Average 

# 2-Jl{ 

# /6.3

Average



# 2·3 /6; 2-

Average



# Z.b 

# /(,., z.

B-17-----------------------iiii-iiii':.iiii-----....IN<I.r:pPLANT/4:hl-trAMBIENTTEMPERATUREFIELDDATAA=__B=__jiO\.PROBEHEATERSETTING...-·....•..,•..,c:J>ATEfj;4/0BAROMETRICPRESSURELOCATION/.!r=1-\.Gt'ASSUMEDMOISTURE,%6C:.,),0\HEATERBOXSETTING-z:.">>F.ilterNo.I•Tl.J,·OPERATOR*PROBELENGTH,in.STACKNO.·f,t;,l&}NOZZLEDIAMETER,in.RUNNO.TILJ'l/lrj)..(,A-ISTACKDIAMETER,in."'7,5'7.METER1nGSample4ftC,FACTOR•FinalWI:5,PITOTNO.J../"':)WtgainSAMPLEBOXNO..:lfl7!?:'i-MINUTESPERPOINT{t}'.?YdFACTORO,t:;"),-,Tarewt·AJ,.£1(a.':>TOTALMETERBOXNO.Jt>@)NUMBEROFPOINTSSTARTTIMENUMBEROFPORTS-z..,.CLOCKTRAVERSESAMPLlNGSTATICSTACKVELOCITYTIMlilPOlNTTIMEPRESSURETEMPREAD(Bn)NlJMBER(@)min.(in'H,O)(Ts)'.F(APs)IS-I0(j.()c;;::()d"3t2sIO.t0"!"11:'-I('>•t-:s1)...'10{IOi.l!:)-q.-I(J.13J!1,p;q)-13flliS.,..),ljI('1{;,:,)_;(),'!\...11).."5°20"ItIOvrJIii{11,0ICLr:::J....1 \;z.S4c.:;o(?.j'J%.lj$$(O-iltoc>lno"'',e-I30'-15\t.\tiS?.1'3r3o3"2,-::."{'16.13'1LfS'-:7-r),f3LJDu.t'3'tis'(J.fJ....i]lQ'1lijr.(lfJ·I:LI!"tls1·i10.JIqs-o16·II10I(Jv''f'3J..&qi.JI,,jqv,II)L.,lo.tolo:l-3{:.C)AVERAGEl"lm(/jM;,;PCVOLUMlilORWEIGHTLIQUIDCOLLECTEDIllFlNALlNmALLIQUIDCOLLECTED'TOTALLIOUIDCOLLECTEDfs-IMPINGERVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)112I113.114liSPRESSUREDIFFII.RENTIALA<:ROSSMlilTERORIFICE(All)ln.H10ACTUALDESIRED.-g.-1.1-I.I,-:::vll.-::}A..li.-::rlf-7-IJ.-:J-t-,_1•..,.l'":::!--k9-(!.10.f,j.S1-.cf.f,t.sII,('15'"}..'-j1J];$}-1.1-3.'1'/.7;)..l.-:::r.-:rli,.-:?J...9II."'1'Lb.j,S"\/.,f;li.S"'\1-.:SIP·i'II'1.(.\SII.t.t!I.SL-:s11.1;31.CI···===:'}(.SILICAGELWEIGHTGASS'AMPLEVOLUME(Vm)n'.'lOCI'-toJ{£;,tl0"<..11...,06.-;)....k..\...Io<bI';0..."2:.5"iiY.lLl'111.9-1t;jq,tl/.:lv..04)..1.1;q.-:g-.jot431,'\ltr?.c.q-.;."5'$'4"t0.7,.8;..;,·n......us:lJ.-"1'S{.).ORSATDATATRIALITRIALlTRIALJAverage.GASSAMPLEFILTERTEMPATEXITDRYGASMETERGASPROBEINLETOUTLETTEMP.TEMP(Tm,.)'F(Tm_,)'F•F"Fcqqrtas-::r&1-crli::SC\;;..;'S'9-I;).S"-:t-l.&J1111q--J..6..lI'M3ll..b.S")...'jvt'Rl.(.$ld..'o01,1(2''l..'l.E>O&tqJ..-=1-1';hSB"qq)...;:J.Ol:S=f'qqJS'11qctOt1').5(1!10!.')-."S'?'2{011c>O?.t-02.5X'1coP..€IJ.r;-qJc>oIJ..63"sql()0lbOItoo;!..(111oold..b1"J).C-'I00lbl-t100IUQ..,IOOl61J..bII0IlA60...-----.-.4tlv.2"2-sd-TIMEco,CROSSSECTIONLASTIJMPlNGERAUXILIARYOUTLETPUMPITEMP.TEMP.VACUUMI'F'F(in.Bg)dIIlibl.(6J_,'LtC4'::l(d.,d.,._b:lJ.,(-;).....J_f:liJ...{iir)..60·a62.J..!(.Ic)..._,61IJ...,,1'.)I':]'3:j;t!C/-1'J-,'{.'i1a!'L[.d...:(5""aLEAKCHECKSYSTEMPRE:1OQJCFM@IS"Hg!POST:,c)0I.CFM@lS"HgPITOTPRE:h-C)IL...@>3"H10POST·U,_@>3"H,OIll

I **~** ID - -

......, ___ _

......

__ _._,_

-

- _...._- _._.- --....- ENVIRONMENTAL

... INC. Company: Location: Source: Run No.: lmpinger No.

I l 1 t.f - 5 Net Gain IMPINGER RECOVERY DATA SHEET

**n~Jtl~./** r".

Date Set-up:

hoh f e.,, \ttl I Test Date:

fn. d1

, (J1/L Date Recovered:

'7 R/1

= -m v?il- I USEPA Method: Corresponding Filter No:
Filter Container No: Measurement Method: **~or** Volume **~a** I **~vol**

lmpinger Contents /t{J()""'{ IJ.IMJ Jlz. **~lll.f**

tvfl vt1 r fl.IW Jl,)t:ty tfJcifltll I.L# Nlflltl **,,~,.,/** tJ.JJfll/r_dlf

{; //{ t:-t c,.. e I **~i~ial ~vol**  Ai)nl 7JP-} 637.-ff e'l,f. g **~L** ?J'-1. 2. /,4/.) 63/.{ 5- 4-!c/ B--t..f-{0

**~** -t.f-- u::? **2~14** N14 Nl4 **Di~rence** @llt/vol /®Ttl 1.;..7" Lf? I IS:; 17 I,{ 1, 7 <:;;?i3J Sample Container No. **f.~** I'( **~~** Att4----------------------FIELDDATA---1:151'-1.....JNa.A=__B=__rpPLANT;.:.ch1-trAMBIENTTEMPERATURE1(-l-J-10BAROMETRJCPRESSURELOCATIONi&Jhl-tc\\lkASSUMEDMOISTURE,%OPERATORdtPROBELENGTH,in.qL.j.PROBEHEATERSETTINGJ...'1.ii,.l\J•"Gl·METERH@lCpFACTORSTACKNO.1U-JC,.q,NOZZLEDIAMETER,in.0'(37-zY•FACTORRUNNO1JUC')-MJ,f.A-'[}.....STACKDIAMETER,in.'0'$'•#'$'lPITOTNO.SAMPLEBOXNO...A1''£.X.MINUTESPERPOINT::1,..<"TOTAL...........METERBOXNO.NUMBEROFPOINTSb'-1f!:!PltESSUJq:CROSSSECTIONSTARTTIME1"'.SNUMBEROFPORTS"2.-DIFI'ERENTIALGASSAMPLEFILTERLASTPUMPIACROsSMETERTEMPATEXITIMPINGERCLOCKTRAVERSESAMPLINGSTATICSTACKVELOCITYORIFICEGASSAMPLEDRYGASMETERGASPROBEAUXILIARYOUTLETTIMEPOINTTIMEPRI!SSURETEMPREAD(AH)in.H10VOLUME·INLETOUTLETTEMP,TEMPTEMP.TEMP.VACUUM(Hrs)NUMBER(@)min.(i"'H,O)(Ts)'.F(.&Ps)(tl.Ps)ACTUAL.DESIRI!D(Vm)ft3'F(Tm..,)_'F"F"F'F'F(in.Hg)f::'-I()LlS'(')r1'1.'·?,.-zoLj4l..'1(jC)·r)SA\11?-),;;-d,...';)..;s=:J-hYiJ...t.'is-)...(J"1---:z,'I.<}-l.q.'-'1.rJ-'4J..nl.S\.id..l""l,SC).35!1.1.-:::t--.-:IL-141..l.,.o.l0.:3l.S''J...(_/s-qa'1LJS'LJlvbl.h0'14"1.iSo'3IJ.'IJJ.£l-og:lIi'1;S.::f"..,/0(J,,;;../.t.,!(,744,q.Gt>t103lA,(;{;"S'9'lo{,'1t>3(J.J::l.LC::.t.GOl:i!:;/,33rTos?..-,I:;..._f;oSbIll·l()()1j'S.ltj6.rl..u:,i.Tol1!>3.o'7(}?,I?.".TcLS(,.....Iqlilt'\(1,/j.'i6?-rJ3I'J."'3J,;!')'"'/")'\70"'I..\(;1I1.5'l,y"';!103ll?JA.C!65'":rl.'"L('11J-OdlJ,5t,l,q..:z:s-lio-:3d.,(JJ.....ILl{()n't-r;YYJ-o.l1.5f.'iC14CO.oLI17n.":SJ..\5""\)_l'Z<i.fC...·I(.(().101...4l.G1l.'0jJ_I1'1'll4t-::r!s-1300.13l.-r::;3Ilfl3?..."5-q16Ia.._z0.11L-:r-:.:f1iiJ31.5=J-:lb/\!'4!ci.!it.lc}.d-335\,jsgn.l-....-',1,-q-'-ilr.E03?-.'S':lJ.CJ..!SLJ()..._'1l.Jb"'tf(),1-2:"-q3...,(.k.{4TQJ\S'LJJ.-l.tDyjq().,}j_I.C1.11o.vi?70"3;l.;S\IS:"fiJ.I'lJS'\I,,b1,50\()'?,J...:5'G\;}..'IS'S;).._"}\,I'C"rJ,Jll,Y-'.()4l(t..-1,$'"5.-.•:lII(o,IIi.\.j.{,41'5'..-q-30'3"]..(.3)..f._,()i(}....._ltl3.'i-;;olj6'!..o-Il1.-5..t.f.(·ro3\..<;5':l_joJ1-p.:;O0·II1.5v'14-...Dj,67;l.cl2.(05':5'.)_1'14)-.l)\6'l[Lif,o,IIJ,(od-l.::ted-6_0ss-•J.,.lvtji4S•"J,Io1.3I.'3L.J'-ll\OJ-.l.-<V'\..:lt\.L4r6cJ-60rv./...-)()(41-7?0)/..<t'UW\W..ll-ff±s45l:!UAVERAGE'_..VOLUMEORWEIGIITOFLIQUIDIlMPINGERSILICAGELORSATLEAKCHECKCOLLECTEDVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)WEIGHTDATATIMEco,SYSTEMPRJ!:VCIJCFM@lS"Hg#1111.113114liS2TRIALII'\lIPOST:)OCJ,ICFM@IS"HgFINALTRIAL2IfIV'll\VIvINmALTRIAL3vrv·[/PITOTPRE:'i').-Ok-@>3"H10LIQUIDCOLLECTEDAvera11ePOST:'tf-Ot@>3"H,OTOTALLIQUIDCOLLECTED(spedfvmlorg),r"?fp.v'.....-IMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEET----...------__.....--....._-....__...__,.,....ENVIRONMENTAL.....INC.Company:if_ohlt!v[;17,.DateSet-up:Location:lf_p£.,/'(v(.wr:.TestDate:Source:7ft-'eflZDateRecovered:RunNo.:-rft,t.:=-JII1u14--7-USEPAMethod:CorrespondingFilterNo:FilterContainerNo:MeasurementMethod:VolumeJltialIlmpingervolvollmpingerNo.Contentsl,.mL{P./rlf/rfllyt72I#11-"1((.?72-/,)?IPCl,I'll(J.IftfM#IIb£/8'.2'-f/fltJ,n{J./qt/f735".773t.)/'/s7?J,.(JNetGainOJI1\.).....e'-'1-ft?--l.{-{C7U/4M4N/11'Difference)3.5"1.).r'.>tJ.B/Q'di._;)SampleContainerNo.M{A#.;It#I(------------------------=--=.....=-----......Cf'rLANTNDATE!\.)LOCATIONk:ohtelAMBIENTTEMPERATUREX,"'-I0BAROMETRICPRESSURE/UhKr:WASSUMEDMOISTURE,%,,,OPERATORsjG-=PROBELENGTH,in.STACKNO.NOZZLEDlAMETER,m.RUNNO.L1-t\Q.6tt-3STACKDIAMETER,inSAMPLEBOXNO..MINUTESPERPOINT......................................STARTTIMECLOCKTRAVERSESAMPLINGSTATICSTACKTIMEPOINTTIMEPRESSURETEMP(Hn)NUMBER(6)min.(in'H20)(Ts)'FI50SI()-ovo'i<1.tl'1£\1':5I01K','tf'll"14SOJ5r<<IoI.JSI'4S"Oj'\)")..07l511'12LlLtl(1'5}-<"t-zo'142u?LJI.f1'L'S"1o-..1z,si-ll-/0\)"''.'14fs'/u:;'J.bti-)304501--I'tttl)i61il:3'1ILtS.S15'if,_-\...)(}Lj<SI,,(f...ls:tiSSI7l.-1-$!HSb!1')oLf55lt:li./4q--IH6J\\)'\i4Y6.1-z,4:5'"16DCr....(.)...----..AVERAGE-z.,4,1:>60A.iJVf1;o.'JlVOLUMEOR\VEIGflTOFfIMPINGERFIELDDATAq:t.jPROBEHEATERSETTINGHEATERBOXSETTING7•t)METERH@lY<>t'"tc,FACTOR0•'"39?Y•FACTOR'3S';q.fPITOTNO.PltESSUREQloolDIFFERENTIALACROSSMETERVELOCITYORlFICEGASSAMPLEHEAD(All)in.H,oVOLUME(APs)·(AP,}ACTUALDESIRED(Vm)fi3lJ..,,-q.-i.-+3llrx4.(•.1.."9;.-=;3_lli1.(i,1-·j:q-3\1?:I.--::r1,-q-3ltRiI(>,1"'7t,--;rt--q-3"'''tI-1.W(j,f1).bj.$'\i.jC\?,,l.j0t:iISO}r<6'I1.&1.'1'1-''Jt:iC.._r?-(JJI/.'i'.f"fl/12c.o0.10l.'7,."1,'f.)d(7'·'2,3SUI,li'Q,}O1,"'2,l."?"Z,5"1)$',"']--:::J-"·13f·9J...rgr-:j,(;J..DvJ\3I·-:;}-j.7J...51'R·2'(/.I<L':?'J.-5/0.;S,g0··I'd-Lb.l.hqS"JJ...,Z-5()/lj.f>I·S'"l6jt')...14OviJ..L...b,:,l-1../10.,JIl:bSle>t.\.j).(J.IIL:SI.':;el.\.t1.,IIS).'-1"'9';')..J-.1JOyI0l•3>).t>1.15).."1•'1g'/(cYJ.st§);SlUCAGELORSATCOLLECTEDVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)WEIGHTDATAIll112#3114115gTRIALIFINALTRlAL2INmALTRlAL3UQUIDCOLLECTED__,..-.DAverageTOTALUQUIDCOLLECTED(specifymlorg)/9-'2·'.,._I..-A=BR__TOTAL'ID2JI---I.----CROSSSECTIONG.ASSAMPLEFILlERLASTITEMPATEXITIMPINGERPUMPIDRYGli.SMETERGASPROBEAUXILIARYOUTLETINLETOUTLETTEMP.TEMPTEMP.TEMP.VACUUM'F(Tm_,)'F'F'F'F'F(in.Hg)iOOJtiiG--'J.t"YJ..S-:r66Id.700l::cB).."i,,ICJ..JC>O1-.!:9'z.C<C"\I:2,Lt).{If-"3-z.I\"'lC.315--q.--csi.L'10t2-t:Y'ct'\!...<tit\.:Ll:o25-:::f6rI)e!Cl\bla-..OiqI'J.:S-.rt-:1J,.I.1-.'5'::::;d-..qq61:2.'t!tO\lls3J.-s6c:sll"l&iO\J,J,.loo)...'S£'l..:s((JooJJ.\·)6-:J-.."J...IJ..100-;.{,--<;}...s-q1100IJ.tb'"'SJ..}()0I'lL\..\'l..sb'-'Il...llOO·rtv61-1bYlbl.100).-bb.1:s-=t-I'·l--IoOl!.b:SJ.;'S(,(;],...Id...10Ill.(':?eJ..I.JtDJJ..-s::r[t;;z.,!.JDl£R,r"lLEAKCHECKTIME,....,qo,\'NillSYSTEMPRE:,QC))CFM@IS"HglIL\V\1/h\'IPOST:CFM@lS"Hglt-1J\11VIII"I[,/PITOTPRE:.Y/_,.OLj@>3"810IJ]II'Jw--.....,.__------ -_.._.--__._..-..--.._._,....ENVIRONMENTAL,.....INC.Company:Location:Source:RunNo.:IMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEETtfflh/.evto.DateSet-up:TestDate:IPt7LDateRecovered:711t1:./M£6.,if:_">USEPAMethod:CorrespondingFilterNo:FilterContainerNo:MeasurementMethod:VolumelmpingerNo.IlmpingervolvolContents;gjfuL(irnL!J,IWJ.h$1'1,'2..7'-1.2,2lt:O"""ItJ.tNt12.-,I}/QflP'.IWN((P}f&,?'iI&,'{It!t1wdtJ./W{',;'£ct:tt-eI8t72-.'31/.2NetGain1!4-tt?'8-'l:,.;lc?U,/4NitN/4--Difference$E_voljftihL)!J.0'1}'{li7BrtSampleContainerNo."'*NRNtlr

# STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT FIELD DATA

COMPANY: LOCATION: SOURCE: TEST DATE:
-r 

# Field Orsat Measurements

Run:**111191~~-VHU,{A-** 

# J Run Clock Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1

. #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# 2-3 

# 2-'/ Oxygen 

# /v.O /b.tJ Nitrogen (by difference)

Run: 

# Th19ft>C- I'IIUP!- 

# ZRun Clock Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# 2-.'-/ 2,3 Oxygen 

# 16. I 

# /b- <J Nitrogen (by difference)

Run: 1ftttjf}tJc- fiJ1 

# U;f 

# -3 Run Obck Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# 2.f../ 

# z_, 

# 5' Oxygen 

# 15-B /6.0 Nitrogen (by difference)

STKGSWT.DOC ltn



# B-24 

# #3 

# Zt'! /6-/

#3 

# 2..3 lb'-l

#3 

# 2-<1 j_IO Average**Z~t:f** 

# /6-0

Average



# 2-. 1 

# 16-/

Average



# z.<f 

# /J -9----FIELDDATA--------------------s:=......I/IIC,PLANTAMBIENTTEMPERATUREDATE-lS-J()BAROMETRJCPRES.SURE..,-).l\.•\).qPROBEHEATERSETTINGLOCATION/t.Qhitt:'\AIt:,ASSUMEDMOISTURE,%'tt'/•METERH<'l'ffCpFACTOROPERATORI.NkPROBELENGTH,m.STACKNO"ffti""')0\NOZZLEDIAMETER.in.RUNNO.C\...M}i\-ISTACKDIAMETER,in.Q,S:q7..,Y,FACTOR35'1I'I''PITOTNO.SAMPLEBOXNO..MrNUI'ESPERPOINT[o]ocllNUMBEROFPOINTS/3'-JNUMBEROFPORTS10z.'1f."t1':l....METERBOXNO.STARTTIMEDIFFERENTIALGASSAMPLEACROSSMETERTEMPATCLOCKTIME(lfno.)TRAVERSE,SAMPLINGlSTATICIS.TACKVELOCITYORIFICEGASSAMPLEDRYGl\SMETERPOINTTIMEPRESSURETEMPVOLUMEINLETOUILETNUMBER(6}min.(In,lf20)(Ts)'F(Vm)ft3(Tm..,)'F(Tm..J'F?3""/e-Jz.IoI··o.a,_lr),1::t..III.6nIA\Jv?t}'1•fsdl'f{(Jt·j9d-.\..llttoq"l'-1'\),_V\({3HAvt'-\l5-l."i:5!...J1o0£.:1lO1'-'1lc').)...YlO'hi->J10'1.-J'-1to5Y11O_ld_llI10Ilt1.1J-II'-'li..'"\'&'I&J10IzoIB.l3IIi.-::r-11.;1·1"i.Ii3c)I1'13-b!O.l3II·1.-:+-li.-'1-1ICiou.:SC\1cIltDI14'-t<lo.J/3IIll.U'1I\0IIL1-=;-f10.14IIIL231'115.():7-1&(1c1&oI14111-IO.IL-/-1I1/Tl<gbt.110Ii'1LloIO.IYIILC\jt,gc;lc:),}=t.RT>tIrtoIl44qrJ.t3II1•\st·?£'1<&13I"\0Ilr;JS310.8·1-Ii-i-'li--:rlltroz.11uoIIII·1-"11--:?-3l!l-<1."15'It'\J..lltloI10..1'3II/,IL?l.J11..llU21JJ.-JQ__L_IirS.S'lt\JlIIIL,q3l'i1'1.,,'-1'iI150Il!-iS:1:-__lO_,I:LIkt(;ILc0h,c-"''i?;'IG\CrliCoIlt.tG'-110-li...L_LL'hJl•110011-101___I.11(0IILtIO.i3]IU1-'IL"-1-:sI-::;,"!'f:':f11'0"2,flj'\0II10tl3I-IIIS".,o;1'1o"Ct!1..-ooII0-13_IILt?JlffjS::111--1oIllty.q.-lo.\'?.IIt.SJ.IlH3b'.l1iJ-b"',-z--z.o111loJ1I _,,,fi_111-z-:so.11c,-s.?Io.1;r,11z.b.1L.;31'I'"L£J..111-z...IJCTT1...FILTEREXITGASTEMP.'F).;sri-,li&:).'$""21).,'6,7)...G12,'3l7.t;:;J.-z,€l..-1)$0i':lb3"D.?..oIJ..G}..Sjllfl)Sq9-colV>?A=__B=__TOTALIffiQII.........._____.PROBETEMP'Ffls$:l,.5"",1("'Cl:tb.OM'31:s'Z!5'IJ.\9'lUiI}.."S.S"l-z-%"C1J..;sqIJ..f.iI;t..t;oIJ.S?ll6dlZS91-zCiCROSSSECl10NLASTIMPINGERAUXILIARYIOUTLETTEMP.TEMP.'FI'FL-c:Sslc1'")qlbO1601'160IC"RIlsgS'll;s-ss=r1?2.sqlbJIb:l.6'3S"8's-qPUMP.VACUUM(ln.lfg}LI]jI,)JJI1lll..)il\l\AVERAGE:;"L,;·o-z.,s-oIV\f!XI-...._._.--€[voLUMEoRWEtGtiToruQum1IMPINiiEifCOlLECTEDIVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)#1#2#3#4IJJNALITIALQUIDCOLLECTEDTOTALUQUIDCOLLECTED(specifymlorg)SIUCAGELWEIGHT115I_g_!.....-("!kTI,f'ORSATDATATRIALITRIAL2TRJALJAverageTIMEI(_co,\.lJlfJ,L__\.__&\[_j(1..\V-''IIli,4;V\V/1'JhvvLEAKCHECKSYSTEMPRE:10cJjCFM@l5"HgPOST:>Oc-)CFM@IS'"IfgQIC.,@>J"H10POST:'}')._..1)/(_,@>3"H20OJI1\.)(j)IMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEET---------_.---- -_._.--__._._-.--..,ENVIRONMENTAL.......INC.Company:f[oh/ev-{t?,DateSet-up:'3-:>-tc/Location:l1ot..l-t:c/',W:!TestDate:!f..->-10Source:'/)OLDateRecovered:e-:J-toRunNo.::..rki9:_.lJ]_i/l-··1USEPAMethod:CorrespondingFilterNo:/7"7..0FilterContainerNo:l.fZ.'JtJSMeasurementMethod:VolumeFinalDifferencelmpingervoltJPvollmpingerNo.Contents{glnLi§Jfnl,9]AnLf[O.?flk}t;"'?o71/.'fIIf7i.f.7"'2.l<l7.5%tfNUf._[:f1tlf:P-710.777"'11/Ev"!Df-u,o,.obl"-LI47o).)1I-It'Ohl(11...,!10tr1t...1..6,38.22.,.0b6--tl8'17.5"Qi!QNetGainSampleContainerNo.-----------------------FIELDDATA---......B==·, .lt'AMBIENTTEMPERATUREqq_PROBEHEATERSETTINGg/'3/IbBAROMETRJCPRESSUREtbc\.,;j!,,C')/L<:Jb1-er-\NJ.ASSUMEDMOISTURE,%J.'),METER!l@GfPROBELENGTH,in.tiffC0FACTORPLANT-.-Q,§Z=J"Y,FACTOR:3f...-z_'}'1PITOTNO.TOTALltirMETERBOXNO.OfPOINTS2'1PRESSURl"CROSSSECTIONSTARTTIMEDIFFERENTIALGASSAMPU;FILTERLASTiACROSSMETERTEMPATEXITIMPINGERCLOCKTRAVERSESAMPLINGSTATICSTACKVELOCITYORIFICEGASSAMPLEDRYGASMETERGASPROBEAUXILIARYOUTLETPUMPTIMEPOINTTIMEPRESSURETEMPHEAD(.1ll)in.H10VOLUMEINLETOUTLETTEMP.TEMPTEMP.TEMP.VACUUM(Hrs)NlJMBER(9)min.(in.H10)(T5)'.F(AI'g)(APs)ACTUALDESIRED(Vm)ft3(Tillj,J'F(Tm••,)•f•F'F'F(in.Hg)11b'5'I(1-o.o-:::J-I.J(J/fil:)0.;1_Yloti1o-q.-A\J6-2.J1'L£9-117J'-I0Ltsc.-10,1'-·i.0\66.G9"A,.)dLIrl\1to().,JL-//.'\_Cl?lOt:.ll\t61\s:'\1"'-:f:P"'115'3(}.ft..lI.IJt.'f{,J-.'610(;L'8'J.bll'(ql,1311\\1)'{Lis'(L-1'7,Ob60l""3\"i'S''S'O'-15"5(),ll(Lql.'\tC1.(::f;j()(I)..(C\j.-q"\6)-l-1.r,0,_qJ/ZP\(i'l,Y::tJo-::rIM'i'MoQ_Lt)({10{,_f3l,-:'.1'5_lOc:gh-'S"t(".15"-f.11"<i?oLf'-"''o,t5k1-1.-/11q.-::1---r::J.,bO1."SL-/5_7-11"11>510Ci0i..f5'S0.,1}...L.(!J,.C...Li.f-1.1(-b;oS:lA'f;"?-:S-::J.-1llluo"'4S1l,b-_!r.f.J...iJ.Jl,-:;2lo3···::1..6'6.so-11Lllb411-g.-O.lft'i'lllt3::5..J.lJo:.LlS"Ss\SO'S'/i515'il!.-l\Z...U(),14J.C,1.10l1lll.l?10d..J..Q;;(0l-z.)30(ll'-11.0\J,a'1tOJ..hSCIJ..{,/b"t:l6'163LYOl.<\IS1.3,L-116J....,Uo6gll<S'.J:L'<16'0t.-1'-'J-<:fO.J"'Il/,flqj(:-J,Q.(;)02?0].(:i,.$"'\l16'-':'l<'<tG0'1_'-'13C>,13.1/.-q6i"'1:g!.10d-v(l"hffltt:.o:r-'1-1011.<tJ'ilo.i$"110u':teo6'!:;,,1'51'-140D-rSJJ0..()11110cJJ..6"G''J..t;;9:s-L1116)..<':!t"t.OO•l<;:Loll.A)S0o2C3).6YS't..jl}}fSDS'"'!--()0l,j)._6"ffvqJv'\...)."'1}]0()Z:.bfllIS)'}''Y<102>0to.,t-110J41/.iOqo,'J,.f:rrS6'1jls-sJz..a..ot.:r;g':.:j·i(\v(l,t?i•¥\i'I{'o;t1t:.I;i..Ua()l-zo611.i]..,TOt.f3Q,lf)_.ld,..-LbLf-:3!S&i0'lSLJZs&'lJ"'1t:&'--..A"V,Lvro)V.:f..,-....,(Vl.£"7..)"J,_O-....,<'0AVERAGE)-,.""1vU(·..--_;...-jVOLUMEORWEIGBTOFUQUIDIMPINGERSILICAGELORSAT\,()LEAKCHECKCOLLECTEDVOLUME(mi)ORWEIGHT(g)WEIGHTDATATIME@,-"·\/f;\SYSTEMPRE:jC)vjCFM@IS"HgIll#2113114115gTRIALIAIllVll'-/\IPOST:I00)CFM@IS"HgTRIAL2(\'/"\2\I\-I\..u-ITIALTRIALJ'\Y/1.(lPITOTPRE:@>J"H,Oi:iQUIDCOLLECTED_,.,....-·-...DAverage"POST:.,f-}-()/1\..J@>J"R,OTOTALLIQUIDCOLLECTED(•pecifymlorg)f......___._.I["!OJ

I N co IMPINGER RECOVERY DATA SHEET

**-~- --~··**  --- **-~**

.....

- -

- - _.__ -

- __ .._._

--. -- ,_,_,_

.,... ENVIRONMENTAL

..... /NO. Company: /ftJh **It'~~""** {

17. Date Set-up:

Location: fr41 h lt.,. w :£. Test Date:

Source: -rtt-_/1

**Pt:J~** Date Recovered:

Run No.: 'fl(J'f-, 2q- "2- USEPA Method: Corresponding Filter No:
Filter Container No: Measurement Method: **~or** Volume

lmpinger No. Initial Final

lmpinger **~vol** {fovol

Contents ,QPnL !E.L

( fiiJAt./ f'hlf'*')Pf.J 16

f) z JZZ-. 'I qf13.J

2- ttlil _,/

**5~ EIM/~rr'hHz!z..**  7'18-.B __ 7'93. '7

J **C~v** I **~70.; >7~,**  z.

'f {IPA ( lfflvt **(f~** 6'-6.3 &,70. 7

,. /(,f)-A/ f( **~ t7~**  t/7'-f.s ''17,()

' ),'//C'? t.< L

791'2.. 9/'i.{,

Net Gain .b: ":t. ' **:J:-,;:~v::~**

**f:J~**

/- I""' 1¥'?1-!0 B-3-tt::? **)/Z~ /~o**  **~~""** t.lt'1o **~ D~ence**  vol **~L** 7.,M7 t.flf. 7 5:7 -,__,lf ?...;- 2-B.Lf **~** Sample Container No.------------------------=-=='-=-----...PLANTj[,\l.-1\-t,r'AMBIENTTEMPERATUREDATEg-l.j•j0BAROMETRICPRESSURELOCATIONft:_q\..,'4:-wr;,.ASSUMEDMOISTURE,%OPERATORd'1--'PROBELENGTH,in<STACKNO·:ff!,.J'-\NOZZLEDIAMETER,in.RUNNO"''ffS,}:'\-t\1\>."!•.3STACKDIAMETER,in<SAMPLEBOXNO""AJ-J:sl..MINUTESPERPOINTMETERBOXNO.i(0'3colNUMBEROFPOINTSSTARTTIME-7l::tONUMBEROFPORTSCLOCKTRAVERSESAMPLINGSTATICSTI\CK.TIMEPOINTTIMEPRESSURETEMP(Brs)NUMBER(6)min.(in•H20)(Ts)'<F7"-0II=-i(\i.fb"1A.OIjjO4?k.ji-fDIilt\.:>·J:::JO"'i'30'1'3,5*C>Of'\tO11.S7-<I()1'\50t-fl-fJc•)...O[.€.0'LJL-1.I:so<10LJ'-131"10,,4'15'Q60:::.:'104'11"Cfoo7..wvt.NI"'''C)lllO4Li"\1.(')$-I"L,·wi10"IIll!j,,-..'·i1'10I..JSdI'1'-·10'15"-f1ocr.s•"'\i£0Lfl.ojOltOl3vl&oLIY:t)OJ.....3.'1-.rJO4:r;61k1(0L,JS(..,J'0'13(l'iD'i5..l.JoS3,,,-1,.\)0Y50II0'1'2LiO'-1511113zZ1.<7ilh3i1.:2-olltl"33Z-'1(.J--AVERAGE-VOLUMEORWEIGHTOFLIQUIDIIMPINGERFIELDDATAPROBEHEATERSETTING.J...,4.5),METERH".f'tC•FACTORY,FACTOR.:33,,..l-011PITOTNO.)()7..1-JIJ;£..PRESSUREJ..DIF:FER.ENTIALACROSSMETERVELOCITYORIFICEGASSAMPLEHEAD(AH)in.H,oVOLiJME(APs)(f.Ps).ACTUALDESIRED(Vm)ft't.'U/.,_,14t..'];3"3'-::tnf.J0.I.Y1.4::-;'l..l.fO,S.::Lo,n..'·'-L,..<\"::lJ:ltt:.Q"b.i;r.·'C>,IA-.6.s:rIJ..!.0.-3!><lr;.;d...c.f(j,j;l_ib).:::1-16,l.iv.ba,tJ-..:\"il"i{:j.C.'-1o.l3;1--LC.ctI'A"'Ll,'1t\lru"2.I..q..1/':'4·iA16.l.l-L.hI!.'S'-.C\()..t.f:b(),l.YLwJ-?-(}.1i,.bi<;.c.3J.qDO(),j,),..bl.Si'"3'36-*"2l.b.sg2.4l.·YYrJ.I'_/io;'tot.oRfh'':;,,qi.bO'\-zn,4i\,'31-:::ri.".+0,\'1.1-17:i+-:f.•l'>J:::t-1.4/(').13..,;q:l--'//1:GO_.)/(&5-.,3cV\.-:.--TSILICAGELORSATCOLLECTEDVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)WEIGHTDATA#I#2"3#41152TRJALITRIAL2ITIUALJQtJIDCOLLECTED)AveraKeTOTALLIQtJlDCOLLECTED(specifymlorK)7"__TOTALM-···-..CROSSSECTIONGASSAMPLEFILTERLASTTEMPATEXITIMPINGERDRYGASMETERGASPROBEAU:X:ILIARYOUTLETPUMPINLETOUTLETTEMP.TEMPTEMP.TEMP.VACUUM(Tm,J'F(Tm,.",)'F'F•F'F'F(in.Bg)&02..'z..b:-;;?).,;s-ctqq2..It5ci-...J...(?l);1..60S"Lfll.S'(i,l'5':4ls:t-'Sbd.<?4.J..t\4.n'J.l;tCf:11C5s::r.;1.IS:6-bJ...5C\IJ...lfl...:J-.h?.ll"'Ysor.l,($'('q"..Jlt'22."'7'I:t.hI:Qr!'}/Q?.:;rol.,{C-\5J.....)50d-..'l.bO.5"02'5ilSl1:q0;tsg')..t;q:SI7q0l-5"\).:s85'J-b.lr.ql&S!'".6I';J.(;5S'i.-JI1'1.2'l'<(}..'(}::%:lb3).'$(:J...---.J{\/)\A:::.--v-s·ol.bSZT'r--;Lfj.\V'\ILLEAKCI'IECKTIMEI\co,vOJL.SYSTEMPRE:11/CIjCFM@IS"Hg'f'\II'POST:/!lJ(/CFM@IS"HglvIPITOTPREd''J...OJ(..@3"H,OIPO!rr:a"'/-01(.;@>J"H,O!OJI(..V0-_,____---....-----_,...-_..,_---..-ENVIRONMENTAL.......INC.Company:j1t?lt1-t'vC.'&,Location:W$Source:Tl1-11'Pt?LRunNo.:1}(/7-rf1Zf...}IMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEETDateSet-up:TestDate:DateRecovered:USEPAMethod:CorrespondingFilterNo:FilterContainerNo:MeasurementMethod:VolumeFinallmpingervollmpingerNo.Contents{_91mLlfjjtnL17f8.7tti'f.s'2..Wllv.J7Yi'fe7-6L8763t;.f3ift(if4At7rf7().17;&.Z,fJf1Pvf1//(""Ot_2...I?5;/,"tttt!eL13>0.1185""-1-NetGain8-+-rv,IJ,-I..f-1v?2-4-10r/-zt'-f2./je?7DizenceSamplevolContainer(@nLNo.y'{,'{e.1{).r_f&£/---- ------ ------ ----- ----- TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS FOR CIRCULAR AND RECTANGULAR STACKS AND DUCTS

-- ... - **·~·** Facility

**~~~P~**

Date 'fSiltJ_CY' **----...---,-~.....,..-,...­ Samplinglocati~\=**  **~** YlC[;

Inside of Far Wall to Outside of Port (Distance C)

**J.:t~S** in.

Inside

of Near Wall to Outside of Port (Distance D) in n

Stack

ID (Distance C. Distance D) in. **~(,~o6l**

Port Distance Downstream From Disturbance (B)

**~' in.~** 

Port Distance Upstream From Disturbance (A) il-1£0 in. Note: Sketch Stack/PortsiGontrol Device on Back of Form

Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance (8} =

[

Distance 8 I Stack ID ]
Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance (A) =

[

Distance A I Stack ID ]
Equivalent Diameter For a Square or Rectangular Stack =

[

(2 X L X W) I (L + W) J

Port ID in. (for monorail bracket specs.) ·T -- ·I Sampling Ports Disturbance

Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance (B) "}, 7t.7 ( :2: 2.0)

Equivalent Diameters Up-stream From Disturbance (A) ....,_k. ·f-15 ( :2:0.5)

Number of Ports Used_ .---l.--

Traverse Points I Port

**->-tfj~T** _ Port Length Outside of Stack in. (for monorail bracket specs.)

2 3 .4

5 6

Port Fractional Stack Product of Port Traverse Point

Traverse

%of- I.D. Columns 2 Depth Location From

Point Stack l.D. and 3 Outside of Port

Number

(frac. %) (inches) (inches) (inches) (Sum of 4 and 5 in inches)

1 l0J2

**?_'!,:~.s** Q. '71..1 b'.

**~s** h• 'f Of

2 • /!>)' J..'>.?-S J.. l{ '1 **6.~5 ~.**  G'"t

3 • I '1

,_,, ':}_ ').;u 4·

S'( {;.IJ.5 )0 I 2C

4 .)d-1 '13·?.5 "),51 C:JJ t3

t /6

5 **~r'J** ;2'}.'l5' l>' '7 **~** (. ;;;tS ;ll .ljq

6 • '1)06 'J_'):d-5 f'6. ?'1 **~-d-5** ;t!-f • "' "

7 • Cf..[J.,5 'd-.'?·?-5 lo. '8\ C'· 'd5

**~?** 1 c:) b

... a

I C(b'_51\

**~~.?5** 'J,'l_, 5'1 **6.~ ~rs.**  ? c

9 10 11 12 ·--· -- -

For

Stacks I Ducts::; 24 inches ID- No traverse point shall be located less than 0.5 inches

from stack wall

For Stacks I Ducts > 24 inches ID

- No traverse point shall be located less than 1.0 inches

from

stack wall QAIQC Check: Completeness legibility Accuracy Specifications

__

**W.e~'** Ca\cu\a\or SignatureiDate &:. **~** LOCA nON OF tRAVERSE POINTS IN CIRCULAR STACKS

Pis 4 s 8 10 12

1

5.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1

2

25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 6.7

3

75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6 11.8

4

93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 17.7

5

85.4 67.7 34.2 25.0

6

95.6 80.6 65.8 35.6

7

89.5 77.4 64.4

8

96.8 85.4 75.0

9

91.8 82.3

10

97.4 88.2

11

93.3

12

97.9

DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' {DISTANCE A)

50 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

'HIGHER NUMBER IS FOR RECTANGULAR

STACKS OR DUCTS

24 or 25' STACK DIAME'IER > 0.61 m (24 in.)

• FROM POINT OF ANY

TYPE

OF DISTURBANCE 1Dr(BEND,

EXPANSION. CONTRACTION, ETC) --

STACK

DIAMETER= 0.30 TO 0.61 m (12·241n.) **'~2--~3---74--~5--~6--~7--~8~~9~~10**

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS ISOKIIIETIC

TESllNG Pis 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LOCA noN OF tRAVERSE POINTS IN RECTANGULAR STACKS

CEMS"

2 3 4 5 6 7 s

25.0

16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3

75.0

50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 21.4 18.8

83.3

62.5 50.0 41.7 35.7 31.3

87.5

70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8

00.0

750 643 56.3

91.7

78.6 68.8 92.9

81.3 93.8 9 5.6 16.7 27.8 38.9 50.0 61.1 72.2 83.3 94.4

*3 point CEMS RATA lrairerse point localions (valid for rectangular and round stacks)

DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISIURBANCE' (DISTANCE A)

s!!E. ' HIGHER NUMBER IS FOR RECTANGULAR

STACKS OR OUCTS STACK DIAMETER> 0.61 m {2-4 in,) 2.5 **~2~~3~~4~--~5--~6--~7~--~8--~9~~10**

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISIURBANCE' (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM NUMBER OF tRAVERSE POINTS

FOR

VELOCITY {NON..JSOKINEliC)lRAVERSES

**Fi~d** Sul'"fVis?r Signatureillate ;f3; 8-2-1 J

-:¥ **5-\-~:~..d. t.:9l\~~i\ite.~**  **be.\o~ ~c:>~**  **'ov..~** \ "l **--x:~~';>u.(o.~'.t~** lAse:\ **M~'f.. ~oio+s**  Form FDF 4000.00

# VELOCITY TRAVERSE 

# AND CYCLONIC FLOW VERIFICATION

PLANT

# ~hk_r~**\,}~**

# ~~~~ TION

# -=-JU~~{:---.lEIPJ.j~--· ------ SOURCE

# ~f X" STACK 10**-~J.:~:l_--:J5::-:;:--------** 

## PROBE 

## #I TC 

# #

# =~::-::§~fZ~-:------..........,..--=--- BAROMETRIC PRESSURE/, in. Hg 

# d9 ,**~** 

# "\

OPERA TORS

_ _......,1\u..Lif-t-. 4 

# \2-.L-"'C:::.------- SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT



# RUN NO. 

# -+l-- STATIC, in.H20 -(), 

# 0 {' RUN NO.

__ _ STATIC, in.H20

__ _
TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE NUMBER (.:iPs), in.H20 (Ts), "F <> 

## NUMBER (.:iPs), in.H20 (Ts), "F 0 

# I 

# o.o'l**~ ~q...o**  

# ' 3**~.t);l** 

# :J<l**~.s.** 

# L.J ')**~.O~c; ~~~~**  

# I 1.{**().t:J~**

### ~'Jlf.{;,' 

# $ )**o.o~** 

# D.'15-1\ 

# :z (; 

# (J.02 

# :ZOJ6'•; 

# .0 

# .'9 n, ors**~** 

# Cf.) .Lj**~**

## ~ 

## {').01 

# Qcrs. J 

# I

I 0·015**~t·Y ~**  

# ?_**().o~** 

## !]q"Z,.J 

# i-f 

# 5 f) 

# .OJ-S !l't'V'I**~** 

# t{ (].OJ. 

# S 2DlY· 

# f !..f 

# 5 

# o.o'J..**~9~.1** 

# s (;**e.o~** 

# 'l '\6', 

# 4**~** 

# '2 O·ot) ?-qf, 

# 3 J 

# '1-. 

# O.o 

# I 

# 1'\Lf·'6**~**



# .... AVERAGE 

# I(), 

# t'!>(k;C\**..l~l..'S** 

# d...Ul AVERAGE 

## {} z_ ::: 

# 2- tJ.**~** 

# 7**~:::** 

# ()./&-

# VELOCITY TRAVERSE 

# AND CYCLONIC FLOW VERIFICATION

PLANT

# ~~\Qkuc DATE**~~~/~3~f+b~~----------~-** 

## LOCATION 

# &vbJ.eJ' 

# 1 lJJ2'
SOURCE

# ~~~~~----------- STACK 10

# -~""l!~.c.;::-':-v;JJ=-5 ------------

# PROBE#/TC#~~~~~~~~~----~~--- BAROMETRIC**PRESSk',~** 

## , in. Hg 

# ;15\.J-.1 OPERA TORS

_

# _,tttt.=.u~/c...LJUc=-------- SCHEMA TIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT

RUNNO.

# ~
TRAVERSE POINT NUMBER 

# I

)



# 7



# 1 STATIC, in.H20 

# """,_&]

VELOCITY HEAD (liPs), in.H20**~** 

# ()l t 

## STACK TEMP. (Ts), oF

)"



# t'f4



# "' '7 YAW ANGLE

0 

## RUN NO.

__ _ STATIC, in.H20

__ _
TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE' NUMBER (liPs), in.H20 (Ts), oF 0



# .... 

# AVERAGE B-33

# VELOCITY 

# IRA VERSE 

# AND CYCLONIC FLOW VERIFICATION



# ~~~~T **~~~~~~~~----------~-** LOCATION



# ~~. 

# lei\, 

# \42:( SOURCE

**~** 

## STACK ID 

# ]3 

# J.5



# PROBE#/TC#::~:~:z::================ BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg

**2~Z** 

# J OPERA TORS 

# A-1-t-/ 

# RL- SCHEMA TIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT

**--~~~--------------**



# RUN NO. 

# -.:::'6::J--- STATIC, in.H20 

# -.tO(, RUN NO.

__ _ STATIC, in.H20

__ _
TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE NUMBER (APs), in.H20 (Ts), oF 0 

## NUMBER (APs), in.H20 (Ts), oF 0 

# I ,(') 

# 1. 

# l

**~** 

# J .() 

# .5 J..

**~4**

**~** 

# r>

**~** 

# .1 ,I) 

# 11 

# • n

**~** 

# J

**~v** 

# 'S ,(!) 

# 1 ,(,

tJ 

# ,o I 

# l

**,~** 

### I 

# \rrllf

.. 11 

# f.b ,(lj



## ~ 

## ).

**~i** 

## I 

# ,f?l.l ;},]( 

# J 

# ,t,T?\ lb. 3

**~~II** 

# lt). '1 

# ,o.u l' I

**~** • f) 

# ,q 

# lbo (.,



# .. o

**~** 

# '1.&'\

• {t) 

# t.l 1 \ 

# ,o\tJ 

# tllo

....
•.. 

## AVERAGE



## ~~. **il~'h**

**l~l** 

# ... 'b AVERAGE



# B-34

# . .. STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT FIELD DATA

COMPANY: LOCATION: SOURCE: TEST DATE:

Field Orsat Measurements

Run: 

# 1'11Jt!IAC13--m"LJ 

# -J Run Clock Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# t!hl**~I** Oxygen 

# 'V/.7 

# za? Nitrogen (by difference)

Run: 

# /hI 

# ctt<t-6--VIA**~3-** 

# L Run Clock Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# t20 

# &7.1 Oxygen 

# ZC?-0 uJ,5 Nitrogen (by difference)

. Run: 

# "TI119!2tlf.-1.h12-';

.. 

# 3 Run Clock Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# OJ t/£1 Oxygen 

# ?a) 2.£l-) Nitrogen (by difference)

STKGSWT.DOC l!m 

# #3 

# IJ. 

# I 

# za6

#3 

# {!2- 

# V27

#3 

# _(Z I 

# v:27 Avera2e 

# tfl.J 

# Z0.7

Avera2e



# 61.1 

# zas

Avera2e 

# at 20..h

B-35----

= ==.=E TRAVERSE POINT LOCA T/ONS FOR CIRCULAR AND RECTANGULAR STACKS AND DUCTS

---

;; i!i'i..! **·~..-INC.** Facility **kJk~**

' ate **~** VJ **~ampling** Locatio: **~** wE'[

Inside of Far Wall to Outside of Port (Distance C) in.

Inside

of Near Wall to Outside of Port (Distance D) C,, **~** in r

Stack

ID (Distance C- Distance D)

**~~·7.5** in. **~S ~** 

Port

Distance Downstream From Disturbance (B)<AI).Jt,

**~" in.~** 

Port Distance Upstream From Disturbance (A) ·--l./10

. in. Note: Sketch Stack/Ports/Control Device on Back of Form

Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance (B) =

f

Distance B I Stack ID J
Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance tAl=

f

Distance A I Stack ID J
Equivalent Diameter For a Square or Rectangular Stack =

[

(2 x L x W) I (L + W) J

Port in. (for monorail bracket specs.) AT I- Sampling Ports

Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance {B) 'L}f-; (

**~** 2.0)

Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance (A) '\.. 8. '1 l (

<:!: 0.5)

Number of Ports Used .d..._ Traverse Points I Port___!£. Port Length Outside of Stack in. (for monorail bracket specs.)

2 3 4 5 6

Port Fractional Stack Product of Port Traverse Point

Traverse %of.. I. D. Columns 2 Depth Location From

Point Stack 1.0. and 3 Outside of Port

Number (frac. %) (inches) (inches) (Inches) (Sum of 4 and 5 in inches)

1 -o3-;:{ ctb./5 O·fr6

**6'.;;~-J** ?. 11 : ').as

2 ·loS

t ';).i).']S" 'd_.

**~~** c. ;).5 q,oc

3

t i'1 L.l iJG-?5 s,

,, 6--:z.> II ,4 t1

4 **,<);;~'3** 26.?5 7f.ot..{ b· 1.5' I L{ I <r'T

5 , o'>I"J "J_t.? 5 **1~.** I I c. "J.f l:zc.t

I **~6'**

6

• c;s'Q6' '5i·?5 ::l t, s-o {;. ;). s- 'a'>•(f

7 ;ms **~-'15** :l3."1'1 c.-;;.5 lC\

I Jq

8 **~ tt(j~**  "J-0. ?5

';;!_<;'I r&''\ {;'.;7-j' I **~** 'l.

, ll.f ::: J;t.oO

9 10 11 12 For Stacks I Ducts s 24 inches ID- No traverse point shall be located less than 0.5 inches

from stack wall

For Stacks I Ducts > 24 inches ID

- No traverse point shall be located less than 1.0 inches

from stack wall QAfQC Check: Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications

__

Wlefuoo **~** Ca\cu\a\or SignatureJDate k= **~--**

Field Supervisor Signature!Oate

**~ ~**  ll-2---- [r.J I LOCATION OF TRAVERSE PO!HTS IN CIRCULAR STACKS

8 10 12

6.7

4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1

25.0

14.6 10.5 6.2 6.1

3

75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6 11.8

4

93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 17.7

5

85.4 67.7 34.2 25.0

95.6

80.6 65.8 35.6

89.5

77.4 64.4

96.8

65.4 -g;:s

10 ----m

11 'i2 Pts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 g LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN RECTANGULAR STACKS

CEMS"

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

25.0

16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3

75.0

50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 21.4 18.8

83.3

62.5 &l.O 41.7 35.7 31.3

87.5

70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8

90.0

75.0 64.3 56.3

91.7

78.6 68.8 92.9

81.3 93.8 9 5.6 16.7 27.8 38.9 50.0 61.1 72.2 83.3 94.4

*3 point CEMS RATA lraverse point locations (valid for rectangular and round stacks)

DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE A) DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE A)

50

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5

' HIGHER NUMSER IS FOR RECTANGULAR

STACKS OR DUCTS

24 or25'

• FROM POINT OF ANY

TYPE

OF DISTURBANCE

1

Of-JBEND, EXPANSION, CONTRACTION, ETC)
STACK DIAMETER= 0.30 TO 0.61 m (12-241n.) **~2--~3~~4~~5~~6~~7~~8~~9--~1~0**

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSiREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERS£ POINTS ISOIOIIE'IIC

TESHNG **5~** ' HIGHER NUMBER IS FOR RECTANGULAR

STACKS OR DUCTS STACK DIAMETER> 0.61 m (24 in)

• FROM POINT OF ANY TYPE OF DISTURBANCE

(BEND,

EXPANSION. CONTRACTION, ETC)

16 2.5 **OL2--~3--~4~--~5--~6~--~7--~8--~9~~10**

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW OlSTURBANCE' (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS

FOR

VELOCITY

**(NON~SOKJNETIC)** TRAVERSES Form FDF 4000.00

**~~\ac..t-** LoV\-\-\11\ool, **be\o~ ~ot**  **~u-1- ~~**  **\i"!~Sv<'a.1nW., ~.>.~e~d.**  Me.. ..t **~-~~"'1-c**

# VELOCITY TRAVERSE AND CYCLONIC FLOW VERIFICATION

PLANT

# Ko~1~r**--~~--------------~** 

## DATE 

# tJ, ')--10 LOCATION

## -77'1'\o-:t,<-:-IU'"~t---'--:tJ:-:::~1'..-------- SOURCE 

# \u£e STACK 10**-~'-""=----,..,'l_r-:(:::-. ~,-5------**  

## PROBE 

## #I TC 

## # 

# f!'}6' BAROMETRIC**PRE~SURE,** 

## in. Hg OPERA TORS 

# 0 [__ I 

# A 

# kt SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT I



## RUNNO.

__ _ STATIC, in.H20 "'!l'ft

# ~~ TRAVERSE VELOCITY POINT HEAD NUMBER (6.Ps), in.H20 

# ' I

## ~'i**~** 

# ""\ '-\ l**t~4** 

# 'f 

# '"'li 5 \.)t.t 

# c t'\**~** 

# 7 

# >t. $ 

# "'\ 

# , 1 

# I**t'?>~ ~** 

# "~'i**~** 

# r."'.l:\ lj 

# \ '\l. )**\.2~** t;

## ~--~~ 

# I**"~t. ~**  

# t)6..

•"" 

## AVERAGE 

## (t}(Sk{9t

# tJ

Z- -:.. 

# 2 rf'r Lf 

# 'f
( ,;:? " -::: {J 

# cJ 

# g STACK YAW TEMP. ANGLE (Ts), "F 0 

# '?**1),~~** 

# a**~H..i~** 

# "\



# 1 1

.... 

# "> \.,\\ 0**""\\\..,~** 

# \ 

# "S\11\ 

# 1



# "

,_, ;:\

## "\l~.cr J.f 

# ? 

# Lt

.. I ri. 

# 1\.t.-t\ 

# ' '\\\,(\ 

# ' 1 

# ' n**~·** 

# ,'t; 

# 3J ),'; 

# I "-t17.1 

# l.. ),.ll:, 1 

# t.J

!\.*

# ··~lC..<\ 

# Xi RUN NO.

__ _ STATIC, in.H20

__ _
TRAVERSE VELOCITY 

# I' STACK YAW POINT HEAD TEN(P. ANGLE NUMBER**(~Ps),** 

## in.H20 (Ts), "F 0



# .... AVERAGE 

# B-37

# VELOCITY TRAVERSE 

# AND CYCLONIC FLOW VERIFICATION

PLANT



# ~l 

# (e.£' DATE

**-;w;~-+~~g~:3,../-:-f0------,--** 

## LOCATION 

# l;o\a

**~t** 

# "->.k
SOURCE



# --~\U~EC~lf~--------------- STACK ID

_ **_,~~"7_5'-L** 

# ________ _

**PROBE#/TC#==~~~J~~~~----~~~---** BA.ROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg

**J..~.J!f** 

## OPERATORS .....-l\t,._..\\-..._{""'t'""""[C

_______ _ 

## SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT

RUN NO.



# -~-'--- STATIC, in.H20 

# -,1..;)..

TRAVERSE POINT NUMBER 

# I

1

7

B-38 VELOCITY HEAD (6Ps), in.H20



# ..

**~~'f** 

## STACK TEMP. (Ts), of



# '3 Vf 

## 310 YAW ANGLE

0 

## RUN NO.

__ _ STATIC, in.H20

__ _ TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE NUMBER (6Ps), in.H20 (Ts), of 0



# .... AVERAGE

# ---



# - ===-= ......, 

# _____ _

**~** 

# __ ...,._



# ·~=

**--~­** ONMENTAL

.. INC. 

# VELOCITY TRAVERSE 

# AND CYCLONIC FLOW VERIFICATION

PLANT



# --'-:::k,:=<-k!'-"lG-'e,~,____.-------,-- DATE



# _$~/.....,.ljf..L./41-{D-'---------- LOCATION

**--l..M~I" le.~£'**  **,,_W~k::...__** 

# _____ _ SOURCE 

# \u€tL STACKIO

**~~l~3~.)~p-----------**



# PROBE#/TC#==~%~~~~~~------~~-- BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg 

# L

**~** 

# t. )' OPERATORS 

# _Ar:.utt

......

f..c.&;:;.;L'------------ SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT

RUNNO. 

# 3z

TRAVERSE POINT NUMBER



# 3

(,



# 7 STATIC, in.H20 __.,



# l~ VELOCITY STACK HEAD TEMP. (<iPs), in.H20 (Ts), oF 

# 19/..,



# ... "l,O}

**·~o)** 

## YAW ANGLE

0 

## RUN NO.

___ _ STATIC, in.H20

__ _
TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE NUMBER (.&Ps), in.H20 (Ts), oF 0

• .;r... 

## AVERAGE 

# B-39

# STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT FIELD DATA

COMPANY: LOCATION: SOURCE: TEST DATE:

Field Orsat Measurements**Run:f"ft/~** 

# W't/f-MvJ ,..-} Run Clock Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# t2J t1.} Oxygen 

# za 7**~)** Nitrogen (by difference)

Run: 

# I/1JC, 

# W6t- t41 z,) "' 

# 'Z Run Clock Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide 

# o,:) ().?., 

# Oxygen 

# 2£<7 Zt7.) Nitrogen (by difference)

Run: 

# l11/7wee

...**1.4f~1** 

# ,;, Run Obck Time: Analysis Oock Time:

PARAMETER #1 #2 

# Carbon dioxide (/.(} 

# t20 Oxygen 

# 2-a) 

# '247 Nitrogen (by difference)

STKGSWT.DOC tMS



# B-40 #3 

# tl- 

# I 'Za.6

#3 

# 67./ 

# zab

#3

# ~I**2&1~** 

# Averafl;e 

# 1/.f 

# 2/?c.t

Averafl;e



# c22.. 21J&**Avera~e** 

# tlcJ 

# 2£?-£,TRAVERSE POINT LOCATIONS FOR CIRCULAR AND RECTANGULAR STACKS AND DUCTS

--- ..=-=.=-== ___ ,.,..__ ------ **IA~I** Facility **~~ ~kc**  Note: Sketch Stack/Ports/Control Device on Back of Form

Date **~IT.LlfJ** SamplingLocation):>(' yer ') -iP.cl wbl

'tlv'liilf \N 0 l - livOlEquivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance (B) =

Inside of Far Wall to { c [Distance B I Stack ID]

Outside of Port (Distance C)

**~~~** 2 in.

Inside of Near Wall to r_

Outside

of Port (Distance D) I • 1 **~** in Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance (A) =

[

Distance A I Stack ID ]

Stack ID (Distance C· Distance D)

**~~ sl.);7~**  in.

Port Distance Downstream From Disturbance (B)li2

**{;;~** ..- in. **~~** ('c;lV-t Equivalent Diameter For a Square or Rectangular Stack=

Port Distance Upstream From Disturbance (A) in. { (2 x L x W) I (l + W)]

·

·Equivalent Diameters Downstream From Disturbance (B) (

**~** 2.0)

Equivalent Diameters Upstream From Disturbance (A) (

**~** 0.5 ) monorail bracket specs.) AT f- Sampling ·Ports

Number of Ports Used **~** Traverse Points I Port

__ _ Stack---·_ in. (for monorail bracket specs.)

2

Port Fractional Traverse %of.
Point Stack I.D. (frac. %)

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 Stack Product of

I.D. Columns 2 and 3 (inches) 5 6 Traverse Point location From Outside of Port (Sum of 4 and 5 in inches

For Stacks I Ducts :::; 24 inches ID

- No traverse point shalf be located less than 0.5 inches

from stack wall -

For Stacks I Ducts> 24 inches ID No traverse point shall be located less than 1.0 inches

from stack wall QAIQC Check: Completeness Legibility Accuracy Specifications

__

**W!e~'** Ca\cu\a\or

**SignatureJDat~** CJ .. -h: 1Jlt **·~** llf IQ

Field Supervisor

**Signatu~JPate** · · **~~i~** . •

.. e,.... 2-t d **.~0~** J?u.\ **i~** LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN CIRCULAR STACKS r--

1'111 4 6 8 10 fll

j

6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1

2

25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 1\ 6.7

3

75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6 11.8

4

93.3 70.4 32.3 22.6 17.7

5

85.4 67.7 34.2 25.0

6

95.6 80.6 65.8 35.6

7

89.5 n.4 64.4

8

96.8 85.4 75.0

9

91.8 82.3 1

10

97.4 88.2 1

11 93.3 1

12 97.9/ 1

I

DIJCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE A)

**so~o._s** __ **~---1r.o--~----'r·5--~----2~.0----~~2.5**

' HIGHER NUMBER IS FOR . RECTANGUlAR STACKS OR DUCTS

24 or 25' STACK DIAMETER> 0.81 m (24 in.) **OI~2--~3---L4--~5--~6--~7~~8~~9~~10**

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM A.OW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE B}

MINIMUM NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS ISOKINEllC

TESDHG

1:-(V\ **f.M!..~t:..** L\f a. b \o

. I J..J... 1"!"\ f'.\a.v 1'1s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LOCATION OF TRAVERSE POINTS IN RECTANGUU\R STACKS

CEMS"

2

3 4 5 6 7 8

25.0

16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3

75.0

50.0 37.5 30.0 25.0 214 18.8

83.3

62.5 50.0 41.7 35.7 31.3

87.5

70.0 58.3 50.0 43.8

90.0

75.0 64.3 56.3

91.7

78.6 68.8 92.9

81.3 93.8 9 5.6 16.7 27.8 38.9 50.0 '61.1 72.2 83.3 94.4

•3 point CEMS RATA traverse point locations (valid for rectangular and round sta&.s)

DUCT DIAMETERS UPSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE A)

5 0.5 2.5

STACK DIAMETER> 0.61 m (24 ln.)

16

DUCT DIAMETERS DOWNSTREAM FROM FLOW DISTURBANCE' (DISTANCE B)

MINIMUM

NUMBER OF TRAVERSE POINTS

FOR VELOCITY (NON4SOKINE11C) TRAVERSES **~~~ts** Form FDF 4000.00

# VELOCITY 

# IRA VERSE 

# AND CYCLONIC FLOW VERIFICATION

PLANT 

# \;,IA,I,e.c DATE**~~~(~t~H~Q~--------------** 

## LOCATION**lto~£ec,** 

## \,)f 

# U ' 1\.J- 

# so RCE 

# \\f::Je.c ,.... \Jw

.....**~QJf** 

## STACKID 

# ;).3>,]5 40

# PROBE#/TC#==~\1~&~~--------~----- BAROMETRIC PRESSURE, in. Hg 

# J."t,l& OPERATORS**A\+~** --=->..::....t.>L-- 

## SCHEMA TIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT



# RUN NO.

__ _ STATIC, in.H20

__ _ RUN NO.

___ _ STATIC, in.H20

___ _
TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK YAW TRAVERSE VELOCITY STACK
, YAW POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE POINT HEAD TEMP. ANGLE NUMBER (&Ps), in.H20 (Ts), "F 0 

## NUMBER (.1.Ps), in.H20 (Ts), oF 0 

## \ 

# l**~** 

# ' 1 

# ' 1-t 

# I 

# ; :2. {, I 

# 7 

# 0 & 

# ' q 

# I 11'1 

# .1 II .) 

# lJ 

# s

I 

# d. ) 

# 3 3 J 

# l-J 

# I 

# 5 I (, () 

# 7 } ,- 

# q., I**~**

## ~ 

# I(J 

# ' II 

# l 

# IJ.**~** ¥



# .,.,

,_ 

## AVERAGE AVERAGE



# B-42-----------------------FIELDDATA---:!!'-.!A=__B=__PLANTleeAMBIENTTEMPERATURE--...-..-L!!!fr-----PROBEHEATERSETTINGWEiGHTOFPARTICuuTE,mDATE9)/S/11BAROMETRlCPR.ESSURELOCATION\V;(ASSUMEDMOISTURE,%.Filter'No.Sample.OPERATOR/6PROBELENGTH,in.HI'!____c.FACTORfinalwtSTACKNO.NOZZLEDIAMETER,in.RUNNO.STACKDIAMETER,inFACTORPITOTNO.TarewtWt:l!amSAMPLEBOXNO..A1!"1<MrNUTESPERPOINTTOTALMETERBOXNOSTARTTIMEOFPOINTSOFPORTS;>.,J.t-,::.PRESSUREDIFFERENTIALACROSSMIITERORIICROSSSECTIONGASSAMPLEFILTERt1_j__-1LASTEXITIMPINGERGASSAMPLEGASPROBEIOUTLETTIMEPOINTTIMEPRESSURETEMPVOLUMEOUTLETTEMP.TEMPTEMP.TEMP.(Hn)INUMBERI(8)min.I(I"'H10)I(Ts)'F(Vm)ft3fl:m.,.,)'F•p'F.'F'Flt.IT----Tllf.os--.TI-L3-1'17J}fP,!;1·.,?)--!AtGl)b.l_L(,)S..LJttl-IJ.IIwII11'7II1\,?..J.Iqjq;?I7IjI'll.t,£),Ij,SlfIlj&,-l__t,;.t.:i:et.1_____\_Il771_IIt•.,I1l>IL'11rr'3t>IIJ,oYJJi.ILt,17.L11.1}6Ili;iJ.ljt;__I4f1IIIt&II11?&)ILLJ,_Ii.17I'tl!l<taoIIJ.tAl.IJ!>Jj_.I'iS_&I$oIIIIIl.1I1.t1I.IIIJ.it:lI.l5li_I'15_L£.Lut1IIIt&oIII·J.II.\%ICO)I.IL_]L(Lo11n1u1LLoJSJ_11Ln1JdJSL&.'11v;s11Cof31c,tJ4IIL.-C'Jk>L---LLLd.._L_I.---"i(.Iy,ttJIqoIIT117'-l[,,-,LtL'\1il.lS)IIIfIIDoIII117Tlo71__J__I\<t3.!S37Llt_I.<bct_lI..;tiDII11I1\11IIIn7-l_.rCJIJ[_9aIIJ.c.iIl;3IL.fJ.tIJ..Illaltlt&oIJ,tJI-,,l:f.ll511t'r1'loIl.ltjIII31nn;I\.\,()"cA-L"il&i)5(6.3l;Sq1--T1i1rJr\llIiIlLlI9JII:l.ti;J,II'1II'iIIvIlWI...IIlfRoIQ5&I'15IE,.q__S___L_tr.t\II1lilIIIk3IJ,lCJIS76.oI__!_Id;(.,.I4SI<.,1Ca_IllOIIl,o;\SII1,3III'1:£I7IIIIIIl.3-lTl'fll_-I"lkIG,.lPUMPVACUUM(in.Hg)_\_,JcitJ.:l.3:33"$333...slICiOL_::'J___Ilt3II\J-1lS%,3Ierr-,----jj{;,OIl47l(o7L,IILI1.--I<=f'7lIl<ooI.).54'IIGJ.l3to111oL __1_1.1.:11io7511i,r1.,-,1enT'r·r-r---1-.J.lt.l1'iif1\oJ.1ItIIl..o1JJII\,)11\1t:1IIq'"7IIlC.fJI.JS:i1Lf'1431.dIj=l'::J,olSI_j)Jt{I.I.SITt:lq-tJAVERAGErt6.J.e\JlJ.l3JVOLUMEORWEIGHTOFLIQUIDIIMPINGERCOLLEcrEDIVOLUME(ml)OJ.tWEIGHT(g)ill112#3TOTALLIQUIDCOLLECTED(specifymlorg)114SILICAGELWEIGHT115IRORSATDATATIUALITIUAL2TRIALJAverage-TIMEII.o,,,'J.4J..'/\I\(\lv·.,'lOY'\J-I/r"\)v1)50'"'Irb,3LEAKCH'ECKSYSTEMPRE:.fCC,OS:tJd(CFM@IS"HgPOST:fZtiO.JdCFM@lS"HgPITOTPRE:i-1-4t@>3"H20POST:1:'{....vc_K@>J"H,OOJ

I .j::.. .j::.. - - - .-.-----

- __

......__ --- ------

- __ ._._

... -- .._.._ "ffi""ENVIRONMENTAL ....... INC. Company: Location: Source: Run No.: lmpinger No.

2 7 Lf - ') Net Gain IMPINGER RECOVERY DATA SHEET

I'( ohl't'v CP. Date Set-up:

h ott /"(v \11.11: Test Date:

WfJI \!V[JE Date Recovered:

wv 1- P12-?>-/ USEPA Method: Corresponding Filter No:

Fiilter **C~r** No:

¢111. Measurement Method:

**~or** Volume

lmpinger Contents **~;ty** (O!JA/ Hz.P

Ja? """( f/2-

t:J f?,.-.pry **~ltCu** C--e/ Initial $bvol **~L** 3S'-7 7ti'B.'f 7Wi ,),, 7tl.' Final tJJAvol "QtinL 6tJ"-6 701.0 (,tj7. 'f {:,Lf4.0 737.@ 8-tf-/t:/ ra-s-...-to B---'i -!c? 2.-} IV*

{., <tt

**'5LJ~** z-" Difference J;iJvol (1j)nL

2 'If. '1 -z e-f --,,) 77 Z,'f 7 ___ **cJJi.&~** Sample Container No. Wllf Wtt Ni+ Nlf Nit-------------------------------__._._-----PLANT/{_obl-er-AMBIENTTEMPERATUREDATEg-).(-/QBAROMETRICPRESSURELOCATIONKdJ.t/..or1\II,J;'JIASSUMEDMOISTURE,%OPERATORPROBELENGTH,in.STACKNO.\N{)J-Wb'fNOZZLEDIAMETER.,in.RUNNO!Nl)I-fV.l."6-C)..STACKDIAMETER.,in.SAMPLEBOXNO..MINUTESPERPOINTMETERBOXNO.STARTTIMECWCKTIMETRAVERSE!SAMPLING'STATICPOINTITIMEPRESSURE(Hrs)INUMBERI(9)min.I(in•H,O)IJ..I-=t-lv.r1I0.fo.osn."J..?Iz..I10')..;)'o/I3ILOI4I'36I6'I\ol?,cY?I"I'5'0if.1"&-I7I'on;-:t1111:ro1639I·1It?O1341i'I'"I1vIlIII(}()1'1riPt:1II'"''IIDJliri""')...UIAJlI'"oriA7>oz:r:rl:'tt{4oI3IlvfD1t-tsoI"'1I115'0I1I160I.t:II7Ilto1:5"30I\ll'1VlS'\..10I·;I-z..oviS'S0I1.:)I(.,I()Jl.DOIlllL"tV16I0Ill.,..lLbVI';;...0II-z.,...{(JI--STACKTEMP(Ts)'.F/'1?.51<f51}-go1"1'4J-qc'!1'86r-AJq:'\r::rqf:7C\1'1'C\J:3jl1-o/'\I'F.0f20/5?0;eo1&01-gq1--r\r1'1.r:tqFIELDDATAg'7PROBEHEATERSETTINGWEiGHTOFPARTICuLATE,m:f,Cj•)E"HEATERBOXSETTING/CrJ,METERH.,i1fJ"CpFACTORQ,"'S?JYoFACTOR).3,76IPITOTNO./DFi£fi;.;'LPtmSSUREDIFFEtmNTIAL·Filter'No.Sllfllllle,GASSAMPLEACROSSMETERTEMPATVEWCITYORJFICEGASSAMPLEDRYGASMETERVOLUMEINLETOUTLET(Vm)ft3(Tm.,}'F(Tm••J'Flo..oqoJ11.'-11vs-r1/fVG-o:os?KI-I1::3oIIt0-Ii.J-..Iqs,).IIJ,.;Lll.J-.::t.16::5Lql__j_q_o>.os2oI1.a.._II·I"\>6b.o'7SIIJ,111.1lJlg_"'TIIL.::Llt::'=:f!.C'lGIq8o.oqo,II1.tIIqqII1-d.-11.15IIoolo.a73'II\.·d--631/ou16lt..JS,lil/dIItj_l1o1.oZICJC\i).oqo1,1.f7oq.?13l'ooo.tYWL'-1f.JtS'·11(,.6,.C100o.[_.,]_l:72J.Q_'jCiC?L1·i..IJ.J.-1.I'1&1lTd..,11.1--d..133'i."t"\1ct${·lr).c:r?.\1ls.LI7'-JI1·t31/0t>Ib,IItJIhso.'-IIIr19___J_1_-:J.._._Jj._I_S_I76"'·-::rIorqu.___JJ._&_IL.JS'l767:3qIqq0.a::tol_____ILLll_.(l3-_jlo.Q'9:ol__LLt_LLo'1-'1go.oq.CfT-TiL-11.(>3-o.b-[t[?...---FILTEREXITTOTALGASIPROBETEMP.TEMP•p•pl.S3l.t.\51zb-z.,ll.:$'5""IU3___1f.,_'S'}J..zs£\g,,oLl:6=>IA;C9'IJ-YSlt:rt'\.IZ'$3-[2:5.:!l,1t'1Lj11-;S;L!)..({;IJS3J...(,S'XdlbbO_'IA.'SI-::-z.so1-::."t->oAVERAGEVOLUMEORWEIGHTOFLIQUIDIIMPINGERCOLLECfEDIVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)111I111.I113I1#4EALImALQUIDCOLLECfEDTOTALLIQUIDCOLLECfEDorg)SILICAGELWEIGHT1#5Ig-ZJ.Bi£--oj)----oRSAT'\DATATIMEICO,\'\f)0TRJALI1\.J1t.;4.ln-/rTRJALllJlriiJ.,Ifl/\I/TRJALJ""'1(1'VliYAverage/,.'IJvA=__CROSSSECTIONLASTIMPINGERAUXILIARYOUTLETTEMP.TEMP.'F'Ft..;t.-1I(.ST.JLfI6.'"3Y-9"I(:SLJ{;IQ....lt::.d-'1{,!6d--Ljd-lf-.3lJ3--'LJ5lb3l-1-£__j_fiq"'IJ'-o4'1-167-q-q--(LJ4'6ltd..45Ll.iIt;)..4,Il,JLJ16396TG3YOlbLjLj)16YLJ'iS'ItsIL6kLEAKCJfECKPUMPVACUUM(in.Hg)1·a..1"'-bl..Ia<.lc&1.2..:t!..2lbLJ.....2IJ..!d..,SYSTEMPRE:;Qi::;jCFM@IS"HgPOST:)QUCFM@IS"HgPITOTPRE:'-J-J-0/(,@>J"H10POST:'>"_.<...@>3"H20OJ1.C)-......,____-----------__....--__....._...--.._.__..,.-ENVIRONMENTAL....INC.Company:Location:Source:RunNo.:lmpingerNo.'2)c..f('NetGainIMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEET11"t,I(_""{<7.11ot-..{'1!11",\NLvvr;-1\11111evv()1-t't2,:;.,'Z...DateSet-up:TestDate:DateRecovered:USEPAMethod:CorrespondingFilterNo:No:MeasurementMethod:VolumelmpingervolContents£imLJf'l,6UJflnlH.,cJIt.e'i7vnlHZ/;17t?i.27t?Z..'/C!r.'ft.Z/,lf?:/fc.q6-5'-{c?f,-f'-fOZ')N1+""/})62.--II!'D;encevol2tl'7-'-/)-t.f,L-ljtbC;,,tJUJt,2.-3(;.0zz;:;)SampleContainerNo.NffAI/IINit"1'/JfPilr&\-------------------------.....WO.PLANTk0hI::{,CDATER-t;-{0LOCATIONk;,Cll,/e,c,\..J1.OPERATORSTACKNO.rAJQI-vy¥2'€.'RUNNO.lvhiSAMPLEBOXNOAMBIENTTEMPERATUREBAROMETRICPRESSUREASSUMEDMOISTURE,%PROBELENGTH,in.NOZZLEDIAMETER.in.STACKDIAMETER.inMINUTESPERPOINTMETERBOXNO."fOlOo/NUMBEROFPOil\ITS730NUMBEROFPORTSSTARTTIMECLOCKTRAVERSESAMPLINGSTATICSTACKTIMEPOINTTIMEPRESSURETEMP(Hrs)NUMBER(8)min.(In;HlO)(Ts)'F'130Ju-I0-0.01-J17'1,1..lOl'?t..l750"t,-t.c4go]--:;gg(Oj"yor7-e.(,s-olnq9()051"10.{IO1\gQRSOTtorqq--&ioo!0"i.OvttollIvC>fiJ..{7ll....j,IOJ=t&!IIIJ-jlz-69."1d..t.l'?.Oi999-SJ..}.z!..LOiool.--'1.lt:Oi¥\/0ld-)j(,0ll?q10)..)...-'1-10ltqx-Jo""bJ.--·-rtlr::J-qtOI-i}-t'io6d....1-z,vor?KII"''d-.10136'IlIJ.....l']._,7..i:JIJ'8ILZ.i3L>Z:..'lu-AVERAGE).._'if\;!)..,\.jOWl-o.ot..t(,n.S(-VOLUMEORWEIGHTOFLIQUIDIMPINGERFIELDDATAb£PROBEHEATERSETTING"'l..:r<::>.;;..9.J.."\(0-./,METERH@lI..J.ftCpFACTORQ.Y•FACTOR..,26,A3'"""_..;;;t:?.3-'$PITOTNOlO4,PRESSURE;:)...-DIFFERENTIALACROSSMETERVELOCITYORJFICEGASSAMPLEHEAD(AD)in.H10VOLUME(APsJ·.(APs}ACTUALDESIRED(Vm)IIJ,oc\0J.i-'6I/!1.-q-)D0..0'1,5'I;.3K·JttCOCo.oqo),I.31g()J..,q.(,/.:lI/-'3'19C>CLO!C:l.Jo.o&o).;)...IL1-=ifJ.,l.L.J30-010j,11.1&C}J...}l."'t3(1,0<6:5j,)..f,1<26.;.y/.j,])_IRI-ld..o5I./.ld-..I"?(J,/.J,01..-f.<2:5'-l'J..-;"(>.070I·576o-'54().).\..I11.4.1fw.;.L(£(jr(:otrr.Yf."-1.3h,OC\0)......,n.cPiO....,I.IL3'5(}.()20\.J..._,;.'J..I0\ArJ&OIJ•.Lj.)-.1t'fov.so/,d..1.rl...)'io:1.\..j31-'J....1..d..}C\g.clf.(}.c-2()l.;J..I.')...).'1)..{),I.\.ll<1L-j11U>Ob0·CF:f!)LLP"J'-/30·07...5J.li.It..lCf3Ct·7C1...---:-''Nc...1..15/{vvJ'J-.2:,_,.I\..::::::=-SILICAGELORSATCOLLECTEDVOLUME(ml)ORWEIGHT(g)WEIGHTDATAIll'Ill1#3#4115gTRlALIPALTRIAL2TRlAL3li::IQutDCOLLECTEDAverageTOTALLIQUIDCOLLECTED(spedfymlorg)/A=__B=__WEiGHTOFPARTICuLATE,.;;·l'i!lerNo.SampleFinalWITarewtITOTALImgjl/I·Wt•ll"inCROSSSECTIONGASSAMPLEFILTERLASTTEMPATEXITIMPINGERDRYGASMETERGASPROBEAUXILIARYOUTLETPUMPINLETOUI'LETTEMP.TEMPTEMP,TEMP.VACUUM(Tm,.)'F(Tm..,)'F'F'F'F'F(in.Hg)a;;Z.;S:J..l..D4d..(7('?'':J(j'"L)I'10sc..;oJ....&'4J...SJ:#.l3Lf00'..{-=J.J_1X-b'3J?sq·J..-q--4..\YP'J.:r;;'LIO(,/J.._::r.r:),t;f....,,3b'2.-.;)_"-::l=?J.S"CJ,,;r;-t.}3l1.rs--c2_DO1.67'J.sa...6'9-'&6rlO!:G6l7J•(j--£'d-Lj3rq•Q-3l-s-2A,.,ILl:t6/()-...(.;r;-:.}-'gqd-J,...'$2&2.:5);;;,,(,·...<Q7:f'J:sLlzSf';()rJ..1-t.::::f'l.s.::l.'?.fIJ..iQ'ot•.)Jb...sf);)_Qlq0L.)--s40b3)_let').ISL\2'S2..I'?.6r£I-tI'1:'2/..1;:3LjC)6)..d.C\(..16'<-1'Y16J.!dlt1:(h3lllrl.l0t6''k"'lb"?,.{.•c-::scJJ,._1)'1-).S-s:<7-,.Ji'1f.:l."S'l1.:s1Ill\rq&-..,....p-;··u;d")."1.."0LGKLEAKCHECKTIMECQ,/r\olSYSTEMPRE:IQQ1CFM@IS"HgI\.\POST:.QQCFM@lS"Hg1\f/\..,Fn\1/1Ivv.14./_PITOTPRE:f-'1-:Oi(,IV\IV\"POST:f}--{jr@>3"Hz0I"'IJJI.,1:::.00---,......__-----..-.-- --..-..-_._.-ENVIRONMENTAL......INC.Company:Location:Source:RunNo.:lmpingerNo.I2)Lf)NetGainIMPINGERRECOVERYDATASHEETh(lh(/"[t?,DateSet-up:ifot,l.tv,\h:kTestDate:wf)-JwtJeDateRecovered:\N/J1-11'1USEPAMethod:CorrespondingFilterNo:MeasurementMethod:VolumelmpingervolContentsFinal&Jflol2St&tf>!P#wrI}/,Cl7/t',7-·····························...····-7D77!#a"""'lfl,_o722.}717.9t;tbl-75t')/t-J;fc...eI860-3B-5"-/c?'fj-;;.·-{-c?8-6.-lo'2>A/tit1-'11'1/b-z.-qvoljMnLz2--1//-'"LS_7_.'I3t.b2)0.SampleContainerNo.fV1'fN1fAi/1IAJJ!Nt1-

# STACK GAS MOLECULAR WEIGHT FIELD DATA

COMPANY: WCATION: SOURCE: TEST DATE:

Field Orsat Measurements

Run: 

# VI//)/- Yl1t3""'f Run Oock Time: Analysis Oock Time:

PARAMETER #1

. 

# Carbon dioxide 

# (J,""L Oxygen 

# 2&/f7 Nitrogen (by difference)

Run:**VY{}f...-llf't"Z}~** 

# "L 

# Run Clock Time: Analysis Oock Time:

PARAMETER #1 

# Carbon dioxide 

# rJO Oxygen

# za~ Nitrogen (by difference)

Run:**W/J/-..,2)~** 

# 2- Run Oock Time: Analysis Clock Time:

PARAMETER #1 

# Carbon dioxide 

# {},J Oxygen 

# 2t28 Nitrogen (by difference)

STKGSWT.DOC l!m 

# #2**a~** 

# W7

,_



# #2 

# acJ 

# 217.7

#2 

# ao**2~5** #3 

# tl.L "]t?. 

# 7

#3 

# tf?, 

# I U2&

#3 

# ao 2127 Avera2e 

# {)v/ 

# 2€27

Average



# t2CJ**~(I Avera~e**  

# ao 2t28

8-49

# NOZZLE CALIBRATION DATA FORM



# Date 

# s- :l-[ 0 Calibrated by 

# J'v ft:;;l

**~1~~**
Nozzle Nozzle Diametera

**~D,b** 

# identification Dr Dt, 

# Dt, Davg number nun ( 

# n.) nun in.) nun in.) nun 

# (in. ) 

# I

**~.,:z,s ~<-l-t**  

# Q, 

# 57-::J (L

**~9-::t-**



# CJ-~9(;, (L OC> 

# I 

# o:;sq

where:

**~** ;: 

# 1,2,3, 

# three different nozzles diameters, nun 

# (in.); each diameter must be within (0.025 nun) 

# 0.001 

# in. c

b

**~D** 

# =maximum difference between any two diameters, nun (in.), AD

**~(0.10** 

# nun) 

# 0.004 

# in.

c



# Quality Assurance Handbook MS-2.6

8-50

# --- 

# - - 

# - - 

# -------

,_. 

# --...-.- 

# -==-- 

# - 

# - _.._ 

# -



# ----- 

# - - ,...._ lJ'ENV/RONMENrAL

..... INC. 

# APPENDIXC

899-02 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 

# Analvtical Data

# -==- - 

# - 

# - ......, 

# ___ _ -----..-- 

# - 

# - =
..... = 

# -

__ ,..._ -.- =
.... .

..... ENVIRONMENTAL

.... /NO. 

# Laboratory Case Narrative

Client: Kohler, Kohler WI Source(s): TK-19 POC and Q-24 SBE Sampling Date(s): 8/3/10-8/5/10 Analyses: USEPA Method 26A Hydrochloric and Hydrofluoric Acid USEPA Method 5 Particulate Matter Analysis ARI Project#: 08-226 1) Sample Receipt
Twenty (20) samples were received in good condition on 8/6/2010 and logged in for analysis. All sample receipt criteria were met. 2) Laboratory Analysis

The 0.1 N H2S0 4 

# samples were analyzed following USEPA Method 26A for chloride and fluoride to determine hydrochloric acid and hydrofluoric acid. The filters and acetone probe washes were analyzed following USEPA Method 5 for particulate. After analysis, the particulate samples were shipped to ALS Laboratory Group for metals analysis following USEPA Method 29. 3) QA/QC

All criteria as specified in USEPA Methods 26A and USEPA Method 5 were 

# met 4) Discussion

These are final results for your review. Any questions can be directed to Eric Vogt atARI at (847) 487-1580 x116.

Respectfully submitted,

# ~!Y~ Eric Vogt Lab Manager ARI Environmental, Inc. Wauconda, IL

Texas NELAP 10: 

## T104704428-08A-TX 

# C-1

# C-2 

# ---- 

# ----- 

# - ----- ----- 

# --- 

# ---- ----- .. 

# --

.._._ Y'ENVIRONMENTAL 

### "r INC.



### Kohler Kohler, WI 951 Old Rand Road# 106 Wauconda, IL 60084

ARI ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT

TK-19 POC Q-24 SBE



### Sample ID: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate



### SampleiD: Lab Sample#:

Analyte

Particulate



### Sample ID: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate



### Sample ID: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate 

### Run TK19-M29-1 Filter 0810001

Result

15.65



### Run TK19-M29-2 Filter 0810002

Result

15.95



### Run TK19-M29-3 Filter 0810003

Result

15.00



### Field Blank Filter 0810004

Result

0.55 

### Units Method

mg USEPA Method 5



### Units Method

mg USEPA Method 5



### Units Method

mg USEPA Method 5



### Units Method

mg USEPA Method 5 

### Lab Project#: 08-226

Received: 8/6/2010 Reported: 8/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/03/2010 Sampled 

### By: JB Sample Matrix: Filter


### Analyst

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/03/2010 Sampled 

### By: JB Sample Matrix: Filter


### Analyst Date

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/04/2010 Sampled 

### By: JB Sample Matrix: Filter


### Analyst Analysis Date

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/04/2010 Sampled 

### By: JB Sample Matrix: Filter


### Analyst Analysis Date

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010



### Page 1 of 5

# ---- 

# --- 

# - ----- ----- 

# --- 

# ---- ----- ........... 'f/f"ENVIRONMENTAL 

### Y INC.



### Kohler Kohler, WI 951 Old Rand Road# 106 Wauconda, IL 60084

ARI ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT

TK-19 POC Q-24 SBE

Sample ID: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate



### Sample 

### 10: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate



### Sample 

### 10: Lab Sample#:

Analyte

Particulate



### SampleiD: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate 

### Run TK19-M29-1 Probe Wash 0810005

Result Units

2.56 mg



### Run TK19-M29-2 Probe Wash 0810006

Result Units

2.57 mg



### Run TK19-M29-3 Probe Wash 0810007

Result Units

1.31 mg



### Field Blank Acetone 0810008

Result Units

1.00 mg 

### Method

USEPA Method 5



### Method

USEPA Method 5



### Method

US EPA Method 5



### Method

USEPA Method 5 

### Lab Project#: 08-226

Received: 8/6/2010 Reported: 8/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/03/2010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Probe Wash


### Analyst

EricVogt 08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/03/2010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Probe Wash


### Analyst

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/04/2010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Probe Wash


### Analyst

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/0412010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Probe Wash


### Analyst Analysis Date

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010



### Page 2 of 5



# C-3

# C-4 

# ---- 

# --- 

# - ----- ----- 

# --- 

# ---- -----

... 

# ----- 'fi"'EN'IIRONMENTAL 'fl"' INC.



### Kohler Kohler, WI 951 Old Rand Road# 106 Wauconda, IL 60084

ARI ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT

TK-19 POC Q-24 SBE

Sample ID: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Hydrochloric Acid Hydrofluoric Acid



### Sample ID: Lab Sample 

### #:

Analyte

Hydrochloric Acid Hydrofluoric Acid



### Sample 10: 

### Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Hydrochloric Acid Hydrofluoric Acid



### Sample ID: Lab Sample 

### #:

Analyte

Hydrochloric Acid 

### Run TK19-M29-1 0.1 N 

### H2S04 0810009

Result Units

945.9 ug
15327.1 ug



### Run TK19-M29-2 0.1 N H2S04 0810010

Result Units

787.8 ug
15637.3 ug



### Run TK19-M29-3 0.1 

### N H2S04 0810011

Result Units

924.3 ug
15364.4 ug



### 0.1 N H2S04 Blank 0810012

Result Units

<110.8 ug 

### Method

Method 26- HF & HCI

Method 26- HF & HCI



### Method

Method 26- HF & HCI

Method 26- HF & HCI



### Method

Method 26 HF & HCI

Method 26- HF & HCI



### Method

Method 26- HF & HCI 

### Lab Project #: 08-226

Received: 8/6/2010 Reported: 8/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/04/2010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Imp Contents


### Analyst

Eric Vogt

Eric Vogt

Date Sampled: 08/04/2010 Sampled By: JB 08/2112010
08/21/2010

Sample Matrix: Imp Contents


### Analyst

Eric Vogt

Eric Vogt

Date Sampled: 08/041201 

## o Sampled By: JB 08/21/2010
08/21/2010

Sample Matrix: Imp Contents


### Analyst

EricVogt

Eric Vogt

Date Sampled: 08/04/2010 Sampled By: JB 08/2112010
08/21/2010

Sample Matrix: Imp Contents


### Analyst

Eric Vogt 

### Analysis Date

08/21/2010


### Page 3 of 5

# ---- 

# --- 

# ---**=-==~= --~-**  

# ------ 

# ----- ........... .,.ENVIRONMENTAL

..... INC.



### Kohler Kohler, WI 951 Old Rand Road# 106
Wauconda, IL 60084

ARI ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL REPORT

TK-19 POC Q-24 SBE

Hydrofluoric Acid



### Sample ID: Lab Sample 

### #:

Analyte

Hydrochloric Acid
Hydrofluoric Acid



### SampleiD: Lab Sample 

### #:

Analyte

Particulate



### SampleiD: Lab Sample 

### #:

Analyte

Particulate



### SampleiD: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate 

### Dl Water Blank 0810013 <16.6



### Result

<1 07.8

<16.6



### Run SBE-MS-1 Filter 0810014

Result

7.40



### Run SBE-MS-2 Filter 0810015

Result

8.45



### Run SBE-MS-3 Filter 0810016

Result

7.50 ug



### Units

ug

ug



### Units

mg



### Units

mg



### Units

mg Method 26 - H F & HCI



### Method

Method 26

- HF & HCI

Method 26- HF & HCI



### Method

USEPA Method 5



### Method

USEPA Method 5



### Method

USEPA Method 5 

### Lab Project #: 08-226

Received: Reported:

Eric Vogt 

### 8/6/2010 8/21/2010

08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/041201 o Sampled By: JB
Sample Matrix: Imp Contents


### Analyst

Eric Vogt

Eric Vogt

Date Sampled: 08/05/2010
Sampled By: JB
Sample Matrix: Filter


### Analyst

Eric Vogt

Date Sampled: 08/0512010
Sampled By: JB
Sample Matrix: Filter


### Analyst

Eric Vogt

Date Sampled: 08/05/2010
Sampled By: JB
Sample Matrix: Filter


### Analyst

Eric Vogt



### Page 4 Analysis Date

08121/2010

08/2112010

08/21/2010

08/21/2010



### Analysis Date

08/21/2010



### of 5



# C-5

# C-6 

# ---- 

# --- 

# -
----- 

# ----- 

# __ _..-



# ---- --- .......... 'P"ENVIRONMENTIIL 

### Y' INC.



### Kohler Kohler, WI 951 Old Rand Road# 106 Wauconda, IL 60084

ARI ENVIRONMENTALANALYTICAL REPORT

TK-19 POC Q-24 SSE

SampleiD: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate



### SampleiD: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate



### SampleiD: Lab Sample #:

Analyte

Particulate



### Sample ID: Lab Sample#:

Analyte

Particulate 

### Run SBE-M5-1 Probe Wash 0810017

Result

4.95



### Run SBE-M5-2 Probe Wash 0810018

Result

3.55



### Run SBE-M5-3 Probe Wash 0810019

Result

3.50



### Acetone Blank 0810020

Result

-0.05 

### Units Method

mg US EPA Method 

### 5



### Units Method

mg USEPA Method 5



### Units Method

mg USEPA Method 5



### Units Method

mg USEPA Method 5 

### Lab Project#: 08-226

Received: 8/6/2010 Reported: 8/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/05/2010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Probe Wash


### Analyst

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/05/2010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Probe Wash


### Analyst Analysis Date

Eric Vogt 08/21/2010

Date Sampled: 08/05/2010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Probe Wash


### Analyst Analysis Date

Eric Vogt 08121/2010

Date Sampled: 08/0512010 Sampled By: JB Sample Matrix: Probe Wash


### Analyst Date

Eric Vogt 08/2112010



### Page 5 of 5I Kohler, Kohler, WI; TK-19 POC; 8/4/10

Chloride Determination Calibration Curve Calculation

Std. (!!g/ml) 0.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 ID TK 19-M26A-1 TK19-M26A-2 TK19-M26A-3

0.1 N H2S04 Blank Reagent Dl Water Blank

Lab Dl Water Blank

C1l 4.0

"C "§ 2.0 .. Pre Cal (J.LS*min) 0.00 0.151 0.289 0.673 1.380 Post Cal Average (J.LS*min) 0.00 0.137 0.280 0.686 1.430 (J.LS*min) 0.00 0.144 0.284 0.680 1.405

Sample Concentration Calculations

Analysis 1 Analysis 2 Average

(area counts) (area counts) (area counts)

0.257 0.255 0.256

0.213 0.213 0.213

0.239 0.261 0.250

<0.030 <0.030 <0.030

<0.030 <0.030 <0.030

<0.030 <0.030 <0.030

... .. .. Chloride Calibration Curve Deviation (%) 0.00 4.92 1.71 -0.99 -1.79 HCI Diluted Cone. (!!glml) 1.89 1.58 1.85 <0.22 <0.22 <0.22

.. ...

v = 7.187x

y R 2

= 1.000 Dilution Factor 1 1 1 1 1 1

. .....

fi **0.0~~--------~----~----~------~----~----~----~**

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6

uS* min

()

I --..1 Cone. Ug/ml Peak Area RE Cal Cone % Dif

1.0 0.144 0.144 1.0 2.55

2.0 0.284 0.142 2.0 1.04

5.0 0.680 0.135 4.8 -3.42

10.0 1.405 0.140 10.0 -0.17

mean RF-----:: 0.1402 Sample HCI Mass volume(ml) (!!9)

500 945.9

500 787.8

500 924.3

500 <110.8

- -

- - Analyst:

E. Vogt

Date Done: 08/21/10Kohler,WI;TK-19POC;8/4/10FluorideDeterminationCalibrationCurveCalculationStd.PreCalPostCalAverageDeviation(flg/ml)(JJ.S*min)(tJ.S*min)(JJ.S*min)(%)0.00.000.000.000.001.00.1830.1660.1754.902.00.3580.3430.3512.115.00.9090.9340.921-1.3910.01.8981.9461.922-1.23SampleConcentrationCalculationsIDAnalysis1Analysis2AverageHFDilutedDilution(areacounts)(areacounts)(areacounts)Cone.(flg/ml)FactorTK19-M26A-11.1121.1071.1096.135TK19-M26A-21.1341.1291.1326.255TK19-M26A-31.1051.1191.1126.1550.1NH2S04Blank<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.031ReagentDlWaterBlank<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.031LabDlWaterBlank<0.006<0.006<0.006<0.031-··--··-----·......·---·FluorideCalibrationCurveE12.0I-10.0-c.j8.0c-0'06.0(1)4.0."0"£:2.00:::s0.0ii:0.00.51.01.5uS*miny=5.2493xR2=0.99902.02.5Cone.Ug/mlPeakAreaRECalCone%Dif1.00.1750.1761.0-3.292.00.3510.1761.9-3.635.00.9210.1855.11.2910.01.9220.19310.55.63meanRF-----:::0.1823SampleHFMassvolume(ml)(f.lQ)50015,327.150015,637.350015,364.4500<16.6--Analyst:E.VogtDateDone:08/21/10

### Operator :Administrator Timebase: ICS _1 000 _Anions Sequence :Anions 08-1 0 Page 1-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# 255 TK19-26A-11mps1 &2

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Ouantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 1 

## unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/2010 11:19 19.00

1 0 Anions 08-1 0 #255

. f.lS



## 5.

2.5-:j

' 1.3 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

TK19-26A-1 lm s 1 & 

### 2
1 Flouride

- 4.187 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a. n.a; 

## 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

3

- Chloride

- 5.900



## _ 0

. 5 -t--.---.--.,..--...,-.---.--..-.-.--r--;--r---.,----.---.----,---.-,--.--.--r--.--.--,-....--.--.-,-.--,--;m:..:.:.i_,n

0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00

No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

### 1 4.19 Flouride 3 5.90 Chloride 

## 4 9.40 Nitrate Total:



### ChlorideArea/lntegration 

## 4.00

Height uS 

### 30.799

1.129 3.525 35.453 

## 5.00

Area uS* min



### 5.8413 0.2572 1.0230

7.121 

## 6.00 7.00 8.00

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-9

# C-10 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 2-18 

## 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# 256 TK19-26A-1 Imps 1 

# & 2

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time {min):



# 7.51 

# 6.3i**5.~** i 

## Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/2010 11:39 19.00 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

TK19-26A-1 lm s 1 & 

### 2
1 Flouride

- 4.187 

## 35.0 ECD_1 

# n.a. n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000



## EGO 1

3 • Chloride • 5.904



## _ 0

_

5 ,-+--.--.-....-.--.--.-..-,..--.---,r--o--,.---r----r-.---.--.----.--.--,--.-,---.-.--.--..,--.--.-.--,r--'rm=i'-'Jn 

### 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.19 Flouride 3 5.90 Chloride 4 9.40 Nitrate 

## Total:

ChlorideArea/lntegration 4.00


## Height IJS 31.189

1.135 3.549 35.872 5.00



## Area uS* min

5.9007 0.2549 1.0299

7.185 6.00 7.00 8.00

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

### Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 3-18 8/21/2010 2:22 PM


# 257 TK19-26A-2 Imps 1 & 

# 2

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 1 

### unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8119/2010 11:59 19.00

· 1 

## O.**~~ions** 

### 08-1 0 #257


## J
8.81

# 7.5~

# 6.3~ -i

# 5.~

3.8

2.5

1.3 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

TK19-26A-2 lm s 1 & 

### 2
1 Flouride

- 4.190 

### 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

; 2-4.774 3- Chloride- 5.907**-0.5-t--.--.--.-..,--.--,----,--r--,---,-----r---r--r--r---r-,-r--..---r--,---.--.--.----,--.--.-,--,--,----,,.----;~** 

### 0.00 1.00 2.00

No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.19 Flouride 3 5.91 Chloride 4 9.43 Nitrate Total:

ChlorideArea/lntegration 3.00 4.00

Height

llS 31.064

0.950 0.220 32.235 5.00

Area llS*min

5.8864 0.2133 0.0607

6.160

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-11

# C-12 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 4-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# 258 TK19-26A-2 Imps 1 & 

# 2

Client 

## Kohler, Kohler WI Vial Number: 

## 1 Sample Type: 

## unknown Control Program: 

## Anions 1000 Quantif. Method: 

## ICS_1000_Anions Recording Time: 

## 8/19/201 0 12:20 Run Time (min): 

## 19.00

10.0 

## 25 Amons 08· 0 

### # 

### 8

# ~~s

7. 

# J 8.8

l



# j 6.



## 5.**~** 

### 3.

# 8~ 1



### 2.

# ~ 1. 

### 3-l



## ,.**~** I 

### -0. 0.00 

## 1.00 2.00



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.19 Flouride 3 5.91 Chloride 4 9.44 Nitrate Total:

ChlorideArea/lntegration 

## TK

3.00 

### Injection Volume: 

## 35.0 Channel: 

## ECD_1 Wavelength: 

## n.a. Bandwidth: 

## n.a. Dilution Factor: 

## 1.0000 Sample Weight: 

## 1.0000 Sample Amount: 

## 1.0000

19-26 

### A ·2 mps 1 & 

### 2 

## ECD 1
1 Flouride • 4.194



# I

I 

## 4.00

Height 

# us 31.715

0.944 0.227 32.886 

# \ 

# \

. 2·4.777



### 5.00



## Area 

# uS* min

6.0071 0.2132 0.0658

6.286 .l 

### 3

- Chloride • 5.91 0**·~~~·**


### 6.00 min 

### 7.00 8.00



## Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

### Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 5-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM


# 259**TK19~26A~3** 

# Imps 1 & 

# 2

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/2010 12:40 19.00

. 1 O.

### ~~ions 08-10 #259

6.3

# 5.0~

# 3~**2.5~**

1.3 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

TK19-26A-3 

### lm s 1 & 

### 2
1 Flouride

- 4.187 

### 35.0 ECD_1


## n.a. 

# n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1



### _ 0

_

5 

### -l--.--.,---.--..,.--.....--..-..---,.-.----.,.----,-.----.---.---r-.---,----r--,--.--.--,-....,--..--.---.--,--,--,.....-,r--',m=i:..:;n 0.00 1.00 

### 2.00 3.00



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.19 Flouride 3 5.91 Chloride 4 

### 9.43 Nitrate 

## Total:

Ch lorideArea/1 ntegration 4.00


## Height !lS 30.882

1.041 0.219 32.141 5.00



## Area llS*min

5.8572 0.2393 0.0587

6.155 6.00 7.00 

### 8.00

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-13

# C-14 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 6-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM


# 260 TK19-26A-3 Imps 1 & 

# 2

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quanti!. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min):

7.5

' 

# 6.1

5.

## ~ 

# " 

# 3.81**2.~** j 1.3 ' 

### Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/2010 13:00 19.00 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

TK19-26A-3 lm s 1 & 

### 2
1 Flouride • 4.190 

### 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000



### ECD 1

min 

### -0**.!'>-+--.----.---.---,--.--.--.--..,.--..,.--.,---,---,---,---,----,r--;r--;---,---,------,---,------,--.-.....----.--.----r--.--.----,--~** 

### 0.00 1.00

No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

### 1 4.19 Flouride 3 5.91 Chloride 

## 4 9.44 Nitrate Total:



### Ch lorideArea/1 ntegration 3.00 4.00

Height llS 

### 30.916

1.075 0.212 32.203 5.00

Area IJS*min



### 5.8581 0.2611 0.0593

6.179 6.00 7.00



### Chromeleon (c} Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 7-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# 261 TK19-26A-1 Imps 1 & 2, 5x dil.

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/201013:31 19.00

10 . 0**~~ions** 08-10 #261 TK19-26A-1 Imps 1 & 2, 5x dil.



## 8.8-

7.5-

6.3- 

### Injection Volume: 35.0 Channel: ECD_1 Wavelength: n.a. Bandwidth: n.a. Dilution Factor: 1.0000 Sample Weight: 1.0000 Sample Amount: 1.0000



# ., ECD 1 I 

# I I



# 5.J 1 • Flouride

- 4.197

# 38~
, 2.5-



### 1.3-



### -0.5 ' 0.00



### No.



## 1 2 3 Total: l I 

### 1.00 

### 2.00



### Ret. Time Peak Name min 

## 4.20 Flouride 9.44 Nitrate 15.23 Sulfate

ChlorideArea/lntegration 

# r 

# I

I**---~-L--·····--** 

# v

I I I 

### 3.00 4.00 

### 5.00



### Height Area llS IJS*min 

## 5.304 1.1116 0.692 0.1964 112.031 50.1057 118.026 51.414 ' I 

### 6.00 min
l 

### 7.00 8.00



## Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-15

# C-16 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 8-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# 262 TK19-26A-1 Imps 1 & 

# 2, 5x dil.

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 1 

### unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/201013:51 19.00

, 1 0 0 

### Anions 08-1 0 #262



# .**j~s** TK19-26A-1 

### Imps 1 & 

### 2, 5x 

### dil.

# 8.8~

7.5l

# 6.3~ Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1 

## I



# 51**,~1** 

### • Flouride

- 4.197 

# I 3.8l

l

# 2.5~**1.3~** J 

# l**~** 

### Chloride- 5.917


### -0.5,-f-....,---,--....-,l-..--.--.---r---'lr--<-.\-'-"r-/....-.-.--,--.--,...--,,.--,l---..--,-____,..-,l-,.-..........----,--.-l,....-,,..-:,m=i'-1n 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.20 Flouride 2 5.92 Chloride 3 9.43 Nitrate 4 15.23 Sulfate 

### Total:

ChlorideArea/lntegration 

### Height
us 5.272 0.270 0.687 111.493 117.722 

### Area uS*min

1.1067 0.0553 0.1998 49.8217

51.184

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10



# 263 TK19-26A-2 Imps 1 & 2, 5x dil.

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Ouantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Kohler, Kohler WI 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/2010 14:11 19.00 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

1 0 

## n- Anions 08-1 0 #263 TK19-26A-2 Imps 1 & 

### 2, 5x dil.



# sr**7.5~ 6.3~** 

s.o--

3.8-

'i 

### 2.5-

! 

## 1.3- 1

- Flouride

- 4.190 

## Page 9-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



## 35.0 ECD_1


## n.a. n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

EGO 1

# .~~~~~-.~~~.-~~~\~~.-~~~~~~-.~~~-.-~~~-.~~~-Tm~in 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.19 Flouride 

## Total:

ChlorideArea/lntegration 

## Height 

# us 5.326 5.326 

## Area IJS*min

1.1341

1.134

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-17

# C-18 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 10-18 8/21/2010 2:22 PM



# 264 TK19-26A·2 Imps 1 

# & 2, Sx dil.

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min}: Kohler, Kohler WI 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1 OOO_Anions 8/19/201014:31 19.00 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.


## n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

10 . 0**~~ions** 

### 08-10 #264 TK19-26A-2 lm s 1 & 

### 2, 5x dil. 

### ECD 1

8.8



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

### 1 4.19 Flouride Total:



### ChlorideArea/lntegration Height
us 

### 5.295 5.295 1

- Flouride

- 4.190

# ~

Area uS*min



### 1.1291

1.129

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 11-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM


# 265 TK19-26A-3 Imps 1 & 

# 2, 5x dil.

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quanti!. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/1912010 14:51 19.00

10 Anions 08-10 #265 [modified by Administrator!

•V 

### 118



## 8.8-

' J I

## 7.5~ 

# 61 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

1 · Flouride • 4.192 

### 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000



## EGO 1

5.(}-1 

# i

3.8l

# 2.~ 

# \

1.3J

No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

## 1 4.19 Flouride Total:



## ChlorideArea/lntegration I



### Height 

# us 5.144 5.144 Area uS* min



## 1.1046

1.105

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-19

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 12-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# C-20 

# 266 TK19-26A-3 Imps 1 

# & 2, Sx dil.

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 1 

### unknown Anions 

## 1000 ICS 

## _1 000 _Anions 

## 8119/2010 15:11 19.00

1 O.O**~~ions** 

### 08-10 #266 TK19-26A-3 Imps 

### 1 & 

### 2, 5x dil.



### 8.8-

7.5-

# 6.3~ Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1


### n.a.
n.a. 

## 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1



# i 5.01**~1** - Flouride

- 4.187 

# I**~** 

### 3.8-'

2.5-

1.3-

# ~ v min I I I 

### -0. ;;;5-+--.---.-r--,-l,..--,,--,-,--.---,--.,-=c--r--r--r--,--.---.---.--.,--.,-.,---.,..-,-r-"'1--,--,--r--r_;;..=j 

### 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

## 1 4.19 Flouride Total:



## ChlorideArea/lntegration 4.00



### Height 

# us 5.164 5.164 5.00



### Area 

# uS* min



## 1.1191

1.119 6.00 7.00 8.00



## Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

### Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 13-18 8/21/2010 2:22 PM



# 267 0.1 N H2S04 Blank

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 

## 1000 ICS_1 OOO_Anions 

## 8/1912010 15:38 

## 11.90

_ 10 Anions 08-10 #267 rmodified by Administratorl**-~** j, 

# s

. 11-l 

### '

# 8~**7.5~**

# 6.3~

# 5.~ '

# 3~**2.5~**

1.3- 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 

## 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

1 -Chloride

- 5.897

## ;+---,----.--...,--,---...-.--.--....--.---.--r---.----,--.--,---,...-,--...--.---,---.-....,.----.---,---.-..,-.--..--,---,,----:,m~in 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 \



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 5.90 Chloride Total:

ChlorideArea/lntegration Height 

## MS 0.066 0.066 Area uS* min

0.0124

0.012 ·------ ----.------- -- -----
___________ j



### Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-21

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 14-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# C-22 

# 268 

# 0.1 N H2S04 Blank

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min):

# 7.5~**~**



# 6.31**5.~**

No.

Total: Ret. Time min Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/2010 15:58 19.00

Peak Name



## ChlorideArea/lntegration 0.1 N 

### H2S04 Blank



### Height 

## Area

llS llS*min 

## 0.000 0.000 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1



## Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

### Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 15-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM


# 269 Field Dl Water Blank

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 

## 1000 ICS_1 OOO_Anions 

## 8/19/2010 16:18 19.00

1 0 " Anions 08-1 0 #269 [modified by Administrator]



## .v iJ.S



## 8.8- 

# 751 6.31

., 5.0-i

3.8-

2.5--



## 1.3-

No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height min 

# us 1 5.93 Chloride 

## 0.077 Total: 0.077

ChlorideArea/lntegration 

## Area 

# uS* min

0.0143

0.014 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 

## 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

1

- Chloride • 5.927



### 7.00

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-23

# C-24 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1000_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 16-18 8/21/2010 2:22 PM



# 270 Field Dl Water Blank

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min}: 

## Kohler, Kohler WI 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1 OOO_Anions 8/19/201016:38 

## 19.00

Administrator 

# 8.81 

# 7.5l 6.3i**5.~** 

# l 

# :i

1.3 ' l



## No.



## 1 Total: Ret. Time Peak Name min 5.92 Chloride

ChlorideArea/lntegration Height 

# us 0.073 0.073 Area 

# uS* min

0.0165

0.017 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 

## 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

1

- Chloride

- 5.920



## Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator**Timebase:ICS~** 

## 1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 17-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# 271 Lab Dl Water Blank

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Kohler, Kohler WI 1 

## unknown Anions 1000**ICS~1000_Anions** 

## 8/19/2010 17:14 8.00

· 1 0 Anions 

### 08-1 0 #271



# · · 11s Administrator 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0**ECD~1** 

## n.a. n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

EGO 1

# 2~ 

# '1**-!~----------~** 1 

### 1 -Chloride· 

### 5.927

# -0.5:r-~t-l --.---.--.--,-1---.,.---,---,-, -.,-! 

# --.-..--)r'---1J,_C--.--.,---,., ---r-1----r' ---,---.--,-1

# --,-...,--.,,r--ol-1~,---,---.-, --.-1 ---,-,

# --,----T-~'--'iinl 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height Area min llS JJS*min 1 5.93 Chloride 0.019 0.0031 

## Total: 0.019 0.003

ChlorideArea/lntegration Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-25

# C-26 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-1 0 Page 18-18 8/21/2010 2:22PM



# 272 Lab Dl Water Blank

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Kohler, Kohler WI 1 

### unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/2010 17:23 8.00

1 O.O**A~ions** 

### 08-10 #272 [modified by Administratorl

. l..t



### 8.8-

7.5 

# 6.31**5.~**

# 3.8~ ' l

# 2.5~ I



## 1.3-

No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height min 

# us 1 5.91 Chloride 0.037 

## Total: 0.037

ChlorideArea/lntegration 

## Area 

# uS* min

0.0072

0.007 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 35.0 ECD_1


## n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

1 • Chloride

- 5.913



### Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1000_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 4-8 8/21/2010 2:20 PM


# 253 1.0 ppm 

# F 

# & Cl Std.
- pre

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 standard Anions 

### 1000 ICS 

### _1 000 _Anions 

### 8/19/2010 10:46 8.00 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 

### 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

1.0 m 

### F & 

### Cl Std.

- re 

## EGO 1

7.5l

2.

1.00 2.00 

## 3.00

No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

## 1 4.20 Flouride 2 5.92 Chloride Total:



## ChlorideArea/lntegration 4.00

Height 

# us 0.804 0.775 1.578 1 - Flouride • 4.203 2 • Chloride

- 5.920



### 5.00

Area 

# uS* min



## 0.1831 0.1514

0.334 

## 6.00 7.00 

## 8.00

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-27

### Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 1-8 8/21/2010 2:20 PM



# C-28 

# 250 2.0 ppm 

# F & 

# Cl Std.
- pre

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 1 

### standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/1912010 10:16 8.00

1 O.O**~~ions** 

### 08-1 0 #250



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.20 Flour ide 2 5.92 Chloride Total:

ChlorideArea/lntegration 2.0 ppm 

### F & 

### Cl Std.- pre



### Height Area 

# us uS* min 1.661 0.3581 1.448 0.2892 3.109 0.647 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a. n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1



### Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

### Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 2-8 8/21/2010 2:20PM


# 251 5.0 ppm 

# F & 

# Cl Std.
- pre

Client Kohler, Kohler WI Injection Volume: 35.0 Vial Number: 1 Channel: ECD_1 Sample Type: standard Wavelength: n.a. Control Program: Anions 1000 Bandwidth: n.a. Quantif. Method: ICS_1000_Anions Dilution Factor: 1.0000 Recording Time: 8/19/2010 10:25 Sample Weight: 1.0000 Run Time (min): 8.00 Sample Amount: 1.0000

Anions 

### 08-10 #251 5.0 ppm 

### F & 

### I Std.- pre 

## EGO 1 

## u- 11S 

# c 10.



### 8. 

## 8-

7. 5-



### 6 

### .3-

5

# .0~ i l 

# 1

.5 3

2



### .3 

# i**~ ·~**  I 

### -0 0.00 1.00 2.00



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.20 Flouride 2 5.92 Chloride Total:

ChlorideArea/lntegration 1

- Ftouride • 4.200



# \/' _L ········--·



### 3.00 4.00 5.00



### Height Area 

# us uS* min 4.362 0.9086 3.405 0.6728 7.768 1.581 ) 

### 2 - Chloride

- 5.917

# ~

6.00 min I 

### 7.00



### Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-29

# C-30 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 3-8 8/21/2010 2:20PM


# 252 10.0 ppm 

# F 

# & Cl Std.
- pre

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 standard Anions 1000 ICS_1 OOO_Anions 8/19/2010 10:34 8.00 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1 

## 1 0 " Anions 

## 08-10 #252 [modified 

## by Administrator]

.v**i~S**

# ~ 8.84 

# j 

# '1**~** 

# . "'"'Ide. 4197



### 2- Chloride- 

### 5.917

# ~ 6.31 5.o-]

3.8-



## 2.5- 

# 131

-0.5 

# i**\~** I I I 

## 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00

No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

## 1 4.20 Flouride 2 5.92 Chloride Total:



## ChlorideArea/lntegration .. L

I I 

## 4.00 5.00

Height Area
us uS*min 

## 9.503 1.8982 7.114 1.3795 16.617 3.278 

# II

# ~

I 

## 6.00 min I 

## 7.00 8.00

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10



# 273 1.0 ppm F & Cl std.
- post

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/201 0 17 

## :37 8.00



### 1 0 Anions 

### 08-1 0 #273 [modified 

### bv Administrator]

• ·V 

# ts

8.81

7.5j

# 6~ j 

# 5.1**~** 

# 3.81 2.51 1.3j Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: Page 5-8 8/21/2010 2:20PM



## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

Klouride

- 

### 4.200 3 • Chloride • 

### 5.914 1-1.304

# -+--,--...--.,--,.--,---,--.---,---,.--..---\r'-i~'--r--,---,.--.--.--,--..--..--.,--,...--,r--r--.---r---r--.--.--.----Tm~in I I I I I I I 

### 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00

No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height Area min J,.l$ J,.lS*min 

## 2 4.20 Flouride 0.741 0.1660 3 5.91 Chloride 0.692 0.1372 Total: 

## 1.432 0.303

ChlorideArea/lntegration Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-31

# C-32 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 6-8 8/21/2010 2:20PM



# 274 2.0 ppm F & 

# Cl std.
- post

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Ouantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time {min): Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/2010 17:46 8.00 

# ]

1:ro"' 08-10**~,.**

# :~ l 

# s.oJ

# 3~**2.5~** Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

2.0 ppm F 

### & Cl std.

- post 

### 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

# 1.~**~** • "'"' 1 •• • 4

- 

### 197 2

-

# Ch~rido - 

### 5.910


# --t-----------------..\

______

# j_~~------1 / min**-o.~~~~~-~~~~-.~~~-T~~~~-.~~~,~~~~-,-~~~~~~~~~** 

### 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

### 1 4.20 Flouride 2 5.91 Chloride Total:



### ChlorideArea/lntegration Height 

# us 1.570 1.399 2.969 Area 

# uS* min



### 0.3433 0.2795

0.623

Chromeleon (c} Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

### Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 7-8 8/21/2010 2:20 PM



# 275 5.0 ppm F & Cl std.
- post

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 

## 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 811912010 17:55 8.00

· 10 ,., Anions08-10#275

. .v 

### JlS

8.8-

7.5-



### 1.3- 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount:

5.0 ppm F 

### & Cl std.

- post

1 - Flouride • 4.193 

### 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

# ~ 2 - Chloride

- 5.91 0 

# A**----~~<-----===--~)~--~~,---------~**

_ 0 .5-+--.-.---.-.,..--.----r-..---,---,c---;---,.\"'---f/'-r---,..-.--.----,----.---,-----,----,---.---.-.-.---,.--.-----,---,----,----;;m-=-=!i n I I I I I I I 

### 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 

### 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height Area min 

# us uS* min 1 4.19 Flouride 4.385 0.9343 2 5.91 Chloride 3.484 0.6862 Total: 7.869 1.621

ChlorideArea/1 ntegration Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-33

# C-34 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:Anions 08-10 Page 8-8 8/21/2010 2:20PM


# 276 10.0 ppm F & 

# Cl std.- post

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): Kohler, Kohler WI 1 unknown Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 8/19/201018:04 8.00

. 1 0 Anions 08-1 0 #276 10.0 ppm F & 

### Cl std.

- post 

### Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a. 

# n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000



### ECD 1

.v 

### flS 1 - Flouride- 4.194



### 8.8-

7.5- 2 - Chloride- 5.910

# ~**6.3~** I



### 5.0- 

## \ 

# \ 

# \ 3.8-

# 2~ i 

# ,}

# ~ ••"f"""_

...... 

### 1.3-



# \/ min I I I I I j I -0**.5-+-.---.---r--,--;---;--r---or--;c--r--.>--f---r--r----r--r----,---r--r---.----.-.-..---,--,---,-,--.,--,----,----,~** 

### 0.00 1.00 2.00



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

### 1 4.19 Flouride 2 5.91 Chloride Total:



### ChlorideArea/lntegration 3.00 4.00



### Height 

# us 9.512 7.160 16.673 5.00



### Area 

## uS* min



### 1.9455 1.4299

3.375 6.00 7.00 8.00



### Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 14280 I (J.) 01 ---- --- .::::-==-=-=

=

----- ---

.. - ...... ---- **.,..4JIWIII~AL**

.. INIC.

951

N. Old Rand Rd, Unit 106 Wauconda,

Illinois 60084 ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Chain of Custody Record 5930

**lABo~~l** I Analysis Request

Lab Project No. ·Client Name

I **h;hit~v** f! ""' **~**

**frol11~** Q) t

Ce?, **w~** c: Q)

:s **~**

't:l ! J

ARI Project Manager **ARISampl4~** c: Q) - 8

0PfYI F/T-z- **~~v-~fd** 8 a.t»

>-111:0 c

F- **~**

E 0

Analysis

Location (Waucondi or Pasadena) / 0 t..,!!O :;;

Vlautdlvtd '1 ... **Q)~m ~**  **~ ~** 

Q) c: 0 • ·-mIll

.Q **~E'~** Q)

Engineering or Compliance Test samples c"

Vf!f /It,

(1#1 c.

**~** E 0 \..\'i **~**

:::s

**Olll::::~** e

V\ "'

Sample No. Date Collected Sample ID z 0 e::,.cn D.. .::s: .::s,

**4u~r** (1- 3-JO /tfl¥

.... #11-'f-1 -rh-1'1 {J<.?C- I

. r".el-1 I J. J.

**1./~t:lJ** .'7--3-ftJ I Tflltt-I'Vl cr z ' .If1-l&t Pt:?C- J ,?trV-11 I v, "·

**4"~t77** 9-4-/J} J/1/(f--fl?llt-}

I 111-t¥

poe_ I 1'611',' I **~** v

J?tlJ!f) **~-'/-{0 Fi~**  M f>kJnfr {11-to/ ye?C. I PJv·,· I VI ..!,

L/d1J'-t7 **~rtP 1111~-P'211-'**  I rr Ttr-ter Ptlc I **~.e** I J, ..(

L/fJOG7 @-J-U7 17111 &;-1'112 9'-- '2- : 111-Jct flt?c. 1

**I~(Jtf)~** I J v

f./tl/l61 {J...-t.f-10

**111J~-r11l-&t-'** , /11-t't **P~t--** I llrl/.e I "' v,

L/tl{J'b ff,c.f-{0 rtG.Id 13Juflfl1 : 111-1tt roc. I

**~~** I v J,

'{tlt?(,J

g# 3-- {0

**~21)-J** , flr-t't r cJt:.. I ft77fl.e I v,

**4:~** B-rtt:J **iJl'(J~,M~t-'Z.** I Trr-tq pac I nne I "'

ij(jQf) 'Z- g

... t.f-{0 J]r}C,..J#(llt-) , T/1-19 **?CJ~** I f)p11f.tL ' I,

**£{(/P~7** g.-i.{-10 IFieM {1/c,f'lh : 71r-t'1 poe. I **~** I v..

L/Chb 2.. B-r-t-o 1f1 **}&;...-IM~7-I** ' _T}'rl'j PtJt: I

**if);{//~** I V,

'IOOb'? g

... J,-tC7 111 **J~--11/z.~..-** 'Z..

I --r11-19 PCJc..

J

**BP1fL~** I

"'

L/_(}1/(/"j U-'-1-10 Iffl't-141 l-'1-}

I 711'1'1 f'tlC- I 8(1'{/k!. I J

Special Instructions I Comments **(~i~** (2) Relinquished By (3) Relinquished By

ff1.-Date lime 8'-G-(0

)6'ft7 (2) Date I Time (3) Date I Time

**~'?any -~i/1-VI~#M**  **~*I** (2)Company (3) Company

Requested Analysis Completion Date:

**(1)Re~?-/'~** (2) Received By (3) Received By

Tieri: **~-** Tier III: **(1)~~~e** , (2) Date 1 nme (3) Date /Time

Report

Level:

Engineering

**eor;;-~** QAPP **~1.** '!d /J!oC

Route Results Through: (1)comh£r (2)Company (3) Company

IL."b

-- -- **---~·** -- --- - --- --- _..._ ---.----

5"'15 F ii

___ ..... _ 9"'ENtlifllt>IMEN'At'9 INC.

1710

Preston Rd., Unit C Pasadena,

Texas 77503 Preservation Code

1 ;;;; Ambient Temp.

2 = 4°C (Ice Packs)

3 =Dry Ice

4 = Other (Noted) Comments F/}l't'""' **&t~~T.** I Fttrt!v **&~'~t·** I
**F~fr&-** &t.,.-r. I **r:a~'(v** {..(}Aft I
P,...¢,.! VIliS it

· **llc:..t!ft~ll'\** e:
**IP~<** VfA-fh' fli'...tPt.Ae'

**lf'.t~l!"** Vft:6_lr I **~~(._~JiP'vfe** 1
**IP~.t vi~**  'A,<t!"T<flll'fR

. G. Pwtbc!WtO-fl, f **tiLN~** 't3 **fvt1J,L.W&1'~** I **tJ.IWH~'** (. >

**fleV~** Vtqfl.t; 11./w

**Jlrr~** ' l J

**IP"""'~** Vf'SW'

**~JN ~}**  I c]

**~~~ J~**  2. ffNq}fftt:z : c '1

"J.,fl r'L HIVOJHzO/ t <f

b69 1""2. **'fl~Vti-J/IItOl.-'** L lj_ SHIPMENT:

c **~NDCAR~** FEDX UPS Custody Seal Applied **~No** r-oim LF00010 J w 0'> ---- ---- --- ------- ----- --- __ .,. 9..J!f...:I..AL

.... **~**

951

N. Old Rand Rd, Unit 106 Wauconda,

Illinois 60084 ARI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Chain of Custody Record 59 2 9

LABUSEONLY I og-z:u I Analysis Request

Lab Project No. Client Name I Location f **~**

CD .,;

i1ohfev C 1:7, tfdklev-

, **w~** c .a CD **~**

i F. "CJ 0

ARI Project Manager ARI **Sampler~** ? c CD • 0

/)(4V! **'{:,'-r-z-9~&etd**

0 e.g',_ **~~**

0 **~m..a** c

0 ... .,; g 0

Analysis

Location {Wauconda or Pasadena) :;::; **~** ..............
CD-11:1 ca

\1'1

u

**uc~vtd** 14 ... c

**~** .

CD ·-me **~ ~:;** 

.c CD

Engineering or Compliance Test Samples Cv""""JI11t'4vt.c.. e. E

**~.:s** f

**\~**

::I

**o'lii:::~** """

Sample No. Date Collected SampleiD z 0 @:..U> 0. **~,**

I.JtJOS7 g.A.f-10 -rltl.f?-P'Il(,P/-J·

t 1h-Jft **P~C** I (}AQ.e I 1,

L.fC/799 B-£/..-Hl Tn I '1-PJ?t-t;,lf- Z ( Ifi-ll? fdC.. I llf11/k I ....}

lfa:J61 fi-£1-rO 1/1Jt,-W2'-I4-

**~** ' /lf...-1'1 RJL I {Jdltfe I v,

t/CI!l'fo e..-'1-to **ft.61't;~1"** !Ji11nf1 P./ N t/1_5P4 I l(hT/J.Ie I ""/

'/0'1/ 6-l./-tO fl.IJ't:'ft:,.tf!II'Jf IJjqiiJh 0 I):£ f(.., c? I

**{;dTf/~** I "'

Special Instructions I Comments **(1~~** (2) Relinquished By (3) Relinquished By

**~;me** /t:?-'fO (2.) Date I Time (3) Date I Time

mny- I t;:t/2 <.tt

**~411~** (2)Company (3) Company

Requested **Anal~is** Completion Date:

**~ (1)R~t/'~**  (2) Received By (3) Received By

Tier 1: 1 GT.efn:

**~** Tier ill: (1)

**Oa~~~e** ' / (2) Date I Time (3) Date I Time

Report

Level:

Engineering Complia QAPP 1/;o 7

:ec

Route Results Through: (1)CompA

fl-1!-z.. (2) Company (3)Company ---- --- --- ----- ----- --- ......... ------

...

I!NVBDNIIIENT'AL .... INC.

1710

Preston Rd., Unit C Pasadena.Texas77503 Preservation Code

1 =Ambient Temp.

2 = 4°C (Ice Packs)

3 =Dry lee 4 = Other (Noted) Comments
**I~** 1-2.

- t?.IIVIIz}Py

**~,.;p** r'-

- Cl,l JAJ fl2>0c;

**);,,~.**

rl -a/N fJz50cr SHIPMENT:

( **~DCARR!** FEDX UPS Custody Seal Applied **~~No** FormLF0001()I(;.).......,-----------=-==-==------·-------.....INC.951N.OldRandRd,Unit106Wauconda,Illinois60084ARIENVIRONMENTAL,INC.ChainofCustodyRecord5928lABUSEONLYIoe-2-uIAnalysisRequestLabProjectNo.ClientName/J[!?11tJwltvCP<ic.cCPs,ARIProjectManagerARISampler40cCP•ufl61VIf,0Q.CIuc....-E.2AnalysisLocation(WauoonoaorPasadena)"0-<P-CD1¥...ct$-CP·-CDI'll.aJ!l.eCPEngineeringorComplianceTestSamplesEc:SE::;,Oc»::sSampleNo.DateCollectedSampleIDzuE!;..<nD.LfZl1oZ.g-r;-;o55£-fl1.'i-1'(}-1--'1<BE:Jpp.,;I1,,.,.,5.,.,0IffJE-1"15"-'Z.t12-'Z'/5fJtIlfl4vc;I"'IJ-)-117{I>fi._,.,r-3,l)...$131!Ii(..t11','IJ,1../1)/0Z..g-f-u:?'6)-1..-'lf8f3IIv,f.5--("flJe-1'11(:...2-·5BGI13:J'tlf.eI"·8-..5-t"-VIf''}IIB£Iid71JeI"'l/tli&J)9..-S-10I/it111/.eIvSpecialInstructionsICommentsIIBy(2}RelinquishedBy(3}RelinquishedBy1-t:1It,<.fI:?(2)DateITime(3)DateITimeCompetrf't/1)'flJ;(2)Company(3)CompanyRequestedAnalysisCompletionDate:-.(1)RelvedByt!/':,.._____,y-(2)ReceivedBy(3)ReceivedByTierI:1GTierTierill:,(2)DateITime(3}DateITimeReportLevel:EngineeringC,....,,·QAPP"/bb17roc(1)Company(2)Company(3)CompanyRouteResultsThrough:------------------------------------------1["1!'-1_,ENVIRONMENT'ALY'INC.1710PrestonRd.,UnitCPasadena,Texas77503PreservationCode1AmbientTemp.24°C(IcePacks)3=DryIce4=Other(Noted)Comments/1'/t-<;h<tf<v;;,'If'-I./ftl1b-t!Wdh'(fh..,e'tiP...ll7vetl.r-ceJ,'.fl.-uw,.,cf1SHIPMENT:FEDXUPSCustodySealAppliedFormlF0001

# ---- 

# --- ,=-:=':--:= 

# =


# -------- &Efi..ll

"ff!""l!N'/IRONMENrAL Y"' JN(;J, 

### 951 Old Rand Road, Unit 106 Wauconda. Illinois 60084


# SAMPLE RECEIPT CHECKLIST

Client Name: 

# _..:...;fr;....;;o'--"__;__;_/-_,..._r--

_

# --:-----~-­ Site Location:

# -~/c"'-"e.J:;.__,;h'-'-/--e_-;-- __ 

# /vz

_ _;;___·
-----

ARI Project Manager: 

# 0 Cf 

# n

# ·A~,..c,**~** Sample Collection Date(s}: 

# g 

# /3**~j£1/o** 1710 Preston Road, Unit C Pasadena, Texas 

### n503



## Chain-of-Custody Number(s):

__

# §-_g_28--=-_-_S_~_..;.._3:? 

# ________ _ Chain-of-Custody Form(s}: Custody release signatures, dates, and times present

# ~ No Preservation code noted

# '~ No Project information clearly identified 

# e$ No Sample information clearly identified

## ~~ No Analysis request clearl:t_ identified

# ~ No Report tier level noted 

# 'l.d No
Sample Containers:

.............. 

## Custody seal(s) applied and intact 

# w No Quantity of samples match number on COC 

# 'YJ!s No Container labeiiD numbers and descriptions match COC

# ~ No All containers received in good condition**{'(~** 

## No Liquid levels marked and no indications of leakage •ffel No All container labels are legible**·~** 

## No All sample IDs are unique

# ~ No Samples received in correct type of container**1~** 

## No Samples received within the required holding time

# ~ No Samples received under the required preservation code 

# (e6 No
Nonjonformances and/or Corrective Actions Applied: 

# /1 9Cfmpl-e. r-ec-etfOf. Crtf<t>rt9 J/J?-e/

Samples Received by: Printed Name Signature

Date and Time Received:

# _t§-.L.-;6_6+-./:~!_(}) __ 

# 1_:1

__

, _CO

__

C-38

# A ' ' 

# s uir-onmental

5420 Mainway Drive, Unit 5, Burlington ON, L7L 6A4 Phone: 905-331-3111, FAX: 905-331-4567

SCC Accredited Lab ID# 1003-151779 Ont OW License#: 2285 NELAC Primary Accreditation, NJ DEP ID# CANA003: Secondary Accreditation, TX Cert# T104704433-08·TX 

# Certificate of Analysis

Client Name: 

### ARl Environmental ALS Project Contact: 

### Ron McLeod ALS Project ID: 

### ARI1 00 ALS WO#: 

### L922690 Date of Report 

### 15-Sep-1 0 Date of Sample Receipt 

### 20-Aug-1 0 Client Address: 951 

### Old Rand Road Unit l 

### 06 Wauconda IL

COMMENTS: Metals analysed via ICP-MS Method USEPA 6020A Sample Preparation via USEPA Method 29 MC (14-SEPT-2010) KL (09-SEPT-2010) 60084 Client Contact: 

### Lisa Goldfine Client Project ID: 

### Kohler Co.



# [:,};·;,

# ~?"'/ Certified

# by:~-:·~_"/.~,**~ IC~"~~-** **_~ ~l-:t_···_/);_7** **_,** :_: 7

__________ _ 

### Steve Kennedy Laboratory Manager Results in this cert1ficate relate only to the samples as submitted to the laboratory.

This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of ALS Canada Ltd.



### ALS Canada Ltd L922690 MM 100915 Page 1

# ~439

# ALS 

# Enuironmental
Sample Analysis Summary Reoort

Sample Name TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M25 RUN 1 RUN2 RUN 3 FIELD BLANK REAGEN**BLAN~** AL.S Sample ID L922690-1 L922690-2 L922690-3 L922690-4 L922690- Matrix STACK STACK STACK STACK**STAC~** Analysis Type Sample Sample Sample Sample Sam pi Sampling Date 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 4-Aug-10 4-Aug-10 6-Aug-10 Date of Receipt 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10

Multi-M-Is via ICP-MS LOR ug ug ug ug ug ug front Half Hf fraction 1A Antimony 0.2 2.23 2.60 2.65 2.05 2.15 Arsenic 1 8.27 13.9 12.9 < < Beryllium 0.2 < < < < < Cadmium 0.1 0.475 0.577 1.11 0.330 < Chromium 1 16.7 20.6 30.7 3.88 1.47 Cobalt 0.2 0.507 0.397 0.496 < <

Lead 0.5 42.7 55.0 46.6 1.36 < Manganese 0.5 3.00 3.79 4.01 2.53 1.98 Nickel 0.2 10.1 3.96 5.92 2.29 0.936 Selenium 2 9.63 9.27 8.80 < <

Back Half (HN03 

### I H202) Fraction 2.11 LOR ug ug ug ug ug ug

Antimony 0.1 0.129 0.169 4.65 0.129 <

Arsenic 0.2 8.09 16.6 22.9 < < Beryllium 0.1 < < < < < Cadmium 

## o.os 0.0523 0.275 0.0643 0.593 < Chromium 0.15 0.877 1.90 1.98 0.541 0.181 Cobalt 0.1 0.263 0.318 0.384 < <

Lead 0.05 0.446 0.648 0.753 0.234 0.0611 Manganese 0.15 1.13 1.06 0.696 0.763 < Nickel 0.1 0.927 1.93 1.27 1.36 0.173 Selenium 12.7 34.7 33.4 < <

ALS Canada Ltd L922690 MM 100915 Page 2 of4 

# C-40

# ALS 

# Enuironmental
Sample QC Summary Report Sample Name LCB LCS LCS LCSD LCSD

ALS Sample ID LCB LCS LCS LCSD LCSD Matrix STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK Analysis Type Blank LCS LCS LCS LCS Sampling Date n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Date of Receipt n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a

Multi-Metals via ICP-MS LOR ug ug ug 0 /o Rec ug 0 /o Rec
Front Half HF Fraction lA Antimony 0.2 5.60 17.0 95 13.5 66 Arsenic 1 < 60.3 100 59.2 98 Beryllium 0.2 < 61.1 102 59.7 100 Cadmium 0.1 < 30.3 101 29.4 98 Chromium 1 < 61.2 102 60.7 101 Cobalt 0.2 < 61.4 102 61.1 102

Lead 0.5 < 61.9 103 61.5 103 Manganese 0.5 < 60.5 101 60.0 100 Nickel 0.2 < 59.7 99 59.2 99 Selenium 2 < 61.1 102 58.9 98

ck Half (HN03 / H202) Fraction 2A LOR ug ug ug 0 /o Rec ug 0 /o Rec

Antimony 0.1 < 6.40 107 6.31 105

Arsenic 0.2 0.446 30.7 101 30.5 100 Beryllium 0.1 < 28.9 96 29.0 97 Cadmium 0.05 < 15.2 102 15.2 102 Chromium 0.15 < 31.7 107 31.6 106 Cobalt 0.1 < 31.7 106 31.5 105

Lead 0.05 < 31.7 106 31.2 104 Manganese 0.15 < 31.7 105 31.2 104 Nickel 0.1 < 31.2 104 31.1 103 Selenium 1 < 30.7 103 30.7 103

ALS Canada Ltd L922690 MM 100915 Page 3 of4 

# C-41

# ALS 

# Enuironmental
Sample QC Summary Report Sample Name TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 RUN 1 RUN 1 RUN 1 RUN 1 RUN 1 RUN 1

ALS Sample ID L922690-1 L922690-1 MS MS MSD MSD Matrix STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK Analysis Type Sample Duplicate Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Dup Dup Sampling Date 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 Date of Receipt 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10

Multi-Metals via ICP-MS LOR 

### ug ug ug ug %Rec 

### ug Ofo Rec Front Half HF Fraction 1A Antimony 0.2 2.23 2.24 14.7 104 14.3 101 Arsenic 8.27 8.06 64.8 94 63.7 92 Beryllium 0.2 < < 61.8 103 57.2 95 Cadmium 0.1 0.475 0.486 29.7 98 28.6 94 Chromium 1 16.7 16.4 74.7 97 72.6 93 Cobalt 0.2 0.507 0.531 58.7 97 57.7 95

Lead 0.5 42.7 42.7 108 110 105 104 Manganese 0.5 3.00 2.99 62.3 99 60.6 96 Nickel 0.2 10.1 10.1 66.3 94 64.8 91 Selenium 2 9.63 8,73 65.5 93 64.6 92

ck Half (HN03 / H202) Fraction 2A LOR 

### ug ug ug ug Ofo Rec 

### ug Ofo Rec Antimony 0.1 0.129 0.125 6.21 101 6.29 103

Arsenic 0.2 8.09 8.34 38.5 101 38.7 102 Beryllium 0.1 < < 26.6 89 27.4 91 Cadmium 0.05 0.0523 < 14.9 99 15.0 99 Chromium 0.15 0.877 0.889 31.7 103 31.4 102 Cobalt 0.1 0.263 0.269 31.2 103 31.2 103

Lead 0.05 0.446 0.453 31.7 104 31.9 105 Manganese 0.15 1.13 1.14 32.3 104 31.9 103 Nickel 0.1 0.927 0.922 31.8 103 31.5 102 Selenium 1 12.7 13.1 45.3 108 43.9 104

ALS Canada Ltd L922690 MM 100915 Page 4 of 4 

# C-42

# uironmental

5420 Mainway Drive, Unit 5, Burlington ON, L7L 6A4 Phone: 905-331-3111, FAX: 905-331-4567

SCC Accredited Lab 10# 1003-15/779 Ont OW License#: 2285 NELAC Primary Accreditation, NJ OEP 10# CANA003: Secondary Accreditation, TX Cert# T104704433-0!HX 

# Certificate of Analysis

Client Name: 

### ARI Environmental, Inc. ALS Project Contact: 

### Ron Mcleod ALS Project 10: 

### ARI1 00 ALS 

### WO#: L922690 Date of Report 

### 15-Sep-1 0 Date of Sample Receipt 

### 20-Aug-1 0 Client Address: 951 

### Old Rand Road Unit 1 

### 06 Wauconda IL

COMMENTS: Mercury Analysis via CVAA Method USEPA 7470A (14-Sept-2010 RG) Sample Preparation via USEPA Method 29 (13-Sept-2010 KL) 60084 Client Contact: 

### Lisa Goldfine Client Project 10: 

### Kohler Co.



# Y.t;>/

. j .,. /-/.-;:: 

### Certified

# by:~_-'_;,./~:~'-·_· ....

# _"~·~_ ..

# _'"'_""'_PJ'_~'_" _____________ _ Steve Kennedy Laboratory Manager Results m th1s certificate relate only to the samples as submitted to the laboratory.

This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written permission of ALS Canada Ltd.



### · AL8 Canada Ltd L922690 Hg 1 00915 Page 1

# ~~3

# ALS Enuiranmental Sample Analysis Summarv RePOrt

Sample Name TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 RUN 1 RUN 2 RUN 3 FIELD BLANK REAGENT BLANK ALS Sample ID L922690-1 L922690-2 L922690-3 L922690-4 L922690-5 Matrix STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK Analysis Type Sample Sample Sample Sample Sample Sampling Date 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 4-Aug-10 4-Aug-10 6-Aug-10 Date of Receipt 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10
Mercury via FIMS CVAA LOR ug ug ug ug ug ug Analytical Fraction 1B 0.015 0.101 0.0329 0.0407 < < Analytical Fraction 2B 0.005 0.586 0.971 0.768 <0.130 <0.150 Analytical Fraction 3A 0.005 0.00746 0.0193 0.0150 < < Analytical Fraction 3B 0.025 18.7 25.1 25.4 0.0680 < Analytical Fraction 3C 0.025 4.11 0.492 0.145 < <

ALS Canada Ltd L922690 Hg 100915 Page 2 of4 

# C-44

# ALS 

# Enuiranmental
Sample QC Summary Report Sample Name LCB LCS LCS LCSD LCSD

ALS Sample ID LCB LCS LCS LCSD LCSD Matrix STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK Analysis Type Blank LCS LCS LCS LCS Sampling Date n/a n/a n/a n/a n;a Date of Receipt n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Mercury via FIMS CVAA LOR ug ug ug %Rec ug % Rec Analytical Fraction 1B 0.02 < 0.300 100 0.305 101 Analytical Fraction 2B 0.01 < 1.00 100 1.02 101 Analytical Fraction 3A 0.01 < 0.100 100 0.102 101 Analytical Fraction 3B 0.03 < 0.500 100 0.508 101 Analytical Fraction 3C 0.03 < 0.500 100 0.508 101

ALS Canada Ltd L922690 Hg 100915 Page 3 of4 

# C-45

# ALS 

# Enuironmental
Sample QC Summary Report Sample Name TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 TK19-M29 RUN 1 RUN 1 RUN 1 RUN 1 RUN 1 RUN 1

ALS Sample ID l922690-1 L922690-1 MS MS MSD MSD Matrix STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK Analysis Type Sample Duplicate Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Matrix Spike Dup Dup Sampling Date 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 3-Aug-10 Date of Receipt 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10 20-Aug-10
Mercury via FIMS CVAA LOR ug ug ug ug 0 A> Rec ug OA>Rec Analytical Fraction 1B 0.02 0.101 0.101 0.253 101 0.250 99 Analytical Fraction 2B 0.01 0.586 0.568 6.05 94 5.97 93 Analytical Fraction 3A 0.01 0.00746 0.0756 1.01 89 1.04 92 Analytical Fraction 3B 0.03 18.7 18.8 27.6 89 27.9 92 Analytical Fraction 3C 0.03 4.11 4.18 8.74 93 8.78 93

ALS Canada Ltd L922690 Hg 100915 Page 4 of4 

# C-46

# uironment I

5420 Mainway Drive, Unit 5, Burlington ON, L7L 6A4 Phone: 905-331-3111, FAX: 905-3314567

SCC Accredited Lab ID# 1003-15/779 Ont DW License#: 2285 NELAC Primary Accreditation, NJ DEP ID# CANA003: Secondary Accreditation, TX Cert# T104704433-08- TX



### ALS Project Contact: ALS Project ID: ALSWO#: Date of Report Date of Sample Receipt



### COMMENTS: 

# Certificate of Analysis

Steve Kennedy ARI100 L918881 1-Sep-10 11-Aug-10

PCDD/F via 

### EPA Method 23 Client Name: Client Address:

Client Contact: Client Project ID: 

### ARI Environmental Inc. 951 Old Rand Road, Unit 106 Wauconda, IL 60084 Eric Vogt Kohler

For the sample TK19-M23-3, as well as the laboratory control sample, selected data have been reported fro the analysis of a diluted extract due 

## to suppressive interferences.

Certified by:

# -:::":":_""_}-:·/(:~~-'~·_.~'-[_·::-·~_.,._,A.;;,y_,i_'·**._~~-----------­** Steve Kennedy Laboratory Manager
Results in this certificate relate only to the samples as submitted to the laboratory. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, withou1 the written permission of ALS Canada Ltd. The test results herein meet all of the requirements of ISO 17025:2005 and NELAC (2003) standards unless stated otherwise in the comments above.



### JkS Canada Ltd L918881 100901.xls Page 1 

# ofYf4 7

### ALS 

## Enuironmental Sample Analysis Summary Report sample Name Method Blank TK19-M23-1 TK19-M23-2 TK19-M23-3 WD1-M23-1 WD1-M23-2 WD1-M23-3 TK19-M23 FIELD BLANK

ALS Sample 1D WG1153131·1 L918881·1 L918881·2 L918881·3 L918881·4 L918881·5 L918881·6 L918881·7 sample Size 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sample units Train Train Train Train Tratn Train Train Train Moisture content n/a nta n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Matrix QC STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK STACK sampling Date n/a 03·Aug·10 03-Aug-10 04-Aug-10 05-Aug-10 05·Aug·10 06-Aug-10 04-Aug-10 Extraction Date 23-Aug-10 23-Aug-10 23·Aug·10 23-Aug-10 23·Aug·10 23-Aug-10 23-Aug-10 23-Aug-10
Target Analytes P9 P9 P9 pg pg pg pg pg

**2,3,7 8~TCDD**  <1.3 103 89.2 89.4 <2.5 <4.8 <2.8 <1.0

**1,2,3 8~PeCDD**  <0.69 372 346 471 <3.1 <5.7 7.31 <0.79

**3,4 7,8~HXCOD**  <0.82 234 231 170 <3.5 <1.9 6.95 <0.72 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD <0.90 481 435 479 <9.2 <8.4 <7.1 <0.79

**1,2,3,7,8,9~HxCDD** <0.84 783 743 755 <10 <9.7 <18 <0.74 1,2,3,4,5,7,8-HpCDD <2.0 4850 4520 4980 139 76.9 192 <6.1 OCDD <1.1 40200 37400 42100 1350 711 2170 125 2,3, 7 ,8· TCDF <0.80 <36 38.1 40.8 <1.1 <1.1 <1.6 <0.79

**1,2 3,7**  **~3:-f>eCOF** <1.0 14.0 12.3 13.9 <1.2 <1.6 <2.0 <1.0 2,3.4,7,8-PeCOF <1.0 <22" 23.0 22.8 <1.1 <1.5 <2.0 <0.99 1 1 2 1 3,4,7,8-HxCOF <0.51 <3.0. 7.46 <8.2 <0.86 <0.60 1.68 <0.58 1,2,3,6,7 ,8-HxCOF <0.47 <6.1 <4.2 <7.5 <0.79 <0.55 <0.86 <0.53 2,3,4,6,7 ,8-HxCDF <0.50 <3.5 <2.6 <7.9 <1.3 <0.58 <0.91 <0.56 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF <0.56 <1.6 <1.7 <9.0 <0.94 <0.65 <1.0 <0.63 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF <0.49 <6.0 4.94 7.78 <2.2 <1.7 <1.1 <0.42 1 ,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF <0.63 <0.91 <1.8 <9.4 <0.91 <0.86 <1.4 <0.54 OCDF <0.73 <8.2 12.7 10.2 <1.3 <1.3 <2.2 <0.78

Field Spike Standards %Rec %Rec %Rec %Rec 0 AJ Rec Ofo Rec % Rec o/o Rec 37CI4-2,3,7,8-TCOD n/s 90 88 83 93 93 90 96 13C12-1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-Hx.CDD n/s 92 100 75 84 107 77 76 13C12·2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF n/s 103 106 100 119 108 116 111

**13C12~1,2,3,4,** 7,8-HxCDF n/s 93 121 126 80 98 107 102 13C12 ·1,2,3,4, 7 ,8, 9-HpCDF O/S 109 119 114 103 97 100 98
Extraction Standard&

13C12·2,3, 7,8-TCDD 89 85 52 49 84 87 80 109 13C12·1,2,3, 7 ,8-PeCDD 95 104 58 48 94 115 95 125 13C12 ·1,2,3, 6, 7 ,8-HxCDD 85 99 94 105 90 89 87 102 13C12-1,2,3,4 ,6, 7 ,8· HpCDD 96 132 123 111 85 94 100 83 13C12·0CDD 73 81 76 60 56 56 65 60 13C12-2,3,7 1 8-TCDF 92 97 50 45 82 86 82 96 13C12-1,2,3,7 ,8-PeCDF 91 109 56 57 82 119 83 123 13C12-1,2 1 3 1 6,7 ,8-HxCDF 81 106 101 116 84 94 79 88 13C12-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 97 89 90 78 80 84 eo 83 Cleanup Standards
13C12-1,2 1 3,7 ,8,9-HxCDF 83 93 90 85 89 92 85 83 Homologue Group Totals pg pg pg pg pg pg pg pg Totai-TCDD <1.3 1880 2070 2650 <2.5 <2.5 <2.8 <1.0 Totai-PeCDD <0.69 3770 4170 5380 8.78 16.7 28.8 <0.79 Totai·HxCDD <0.90 8210 7620 7760 <2.5 23.7 54.1 3.34 Totai-HpCDD <0.59 9120 8550 9180 259 142 352 <1.0

Total·TCDF <0.80 141 129 250 <1.1 <1.1 <1.6 <0.79 Total-PeCDF <1.0 82;3 127 86.2 <1.2 <1.6 <2.0 <1.0 Total-HxCDF <0.56 2.22 14.3 45.9 <0.94 <0.65 1.68 <0.63 Totai-HpCDF <0.63 <0.91 10.1 13.3 <0.91 <0.86 <1.4 <0.54
Toxic Equivalency NATO

Lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ 

### o.oo 528 502 573 2.74 1.48 8.61 0.125 Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ 2.77 544 503 577 10.2 12.3 15.5 2.67

ALS Canada Ltd L918881 100901.xls Page2of11 

# C-48

# ALS Enuironmental

Sample Name Al.S Sample ID Analysis Method Analysis Type Sample Matrix

Run Information
Filename Run Date Final Volume DHution Factor Method Blank WG1153131·1 EPA M23 Blank QC

Run 1 1·100830A S:7 30-Aug-10 22:14

20 uL 1 pg 

### Laboratory Method Blank Analysis Report Sampling Date Extraction Date Sample Size Percent Moisture Split Ratio

Ana lysis Units Instrument

- Column HRMS-1 DBSms #US95385613H

Target Analytes 2,3,7 ,8- TCDD 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7 ,8-HpCDD OCDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7 ,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCOF 1,2,3,4, 7 ,8,9-HpCDF OCDF

Field Spike Standards 37CI4·2,3,7,8·TCDD 13C12-1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HxCDD

13C12-2,3,4, 7 ,8-PeCDF 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Extraction Standards 13C12·2,3,7,8-TCDD 13C12-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 13C12·1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 13C12-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 13C12-0CDD 13C12·2,3,7,8-TCDF 13C12-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 13C12-1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF 13C12-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Cleanup Standard

13C12-1,2,3, 7 ,8,9-HxCDF

Homologue Group Totals
Totai-TCDO Totai-PeCDD Totai·HxCDD Totai-HpCDD

Totai·TCDF Totai-PeCDF Totai-HxCDF Totai-HpCDF

Toxic Equivalency NATO
lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ Ret. Time
NotFnd NotFnd Notfnd NotFnd NotFnd 36:38 NotFnd
NotFnd NotFnd NotFnd NotFnd NotFnd NotFnd Notfnd NotFnd NotFnd NotFnd

27:59 32:33 34:46 36:38 38:30
26:38 31:44 34:17 36:01

35:09

#peaks
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cone. pg
<1.3 <0.69 <0.82 <0.90 <0.84 <2.0 <1.1
<0.80 <1.0 <1.0 <0.51 <0.47 <0.50 <0.56 <0.49 <0.63 <0.73

0 /o Rec

n/s n/s n/s n/s n/s
•A> Ree

89 95 85 96 73
92 91 81 97

"'o Ree

83
Cone pg
<1.3 <0.69 <0.90 <0.59 <0.80 <1.0 <0.56 <0.63

pg
0.00 2.77 EDl TEF pg Flags NATO
1.3 

### u 1 0.69 

### u 0.5 0.82 

### u 0.1 0.90 

### u 0.1 0.84 

### u 0.1 0.59 J R 0.01 1.1 

### u 0.001
0.80 

### u 0.1 1.0 

### u 0.05 1.0 

### u 0.5 0.51 

### u 0.1 0.47 

### u 0.1 0.50 

### u 0.1 0.56 

### u 0.1 0.49 

### u 0.01 0.63 

### u 0.01 0.73 

### u 0.001
Limits

Limits
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130 25-130
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130

40-130
EDl Pll
1.3 0.69 0.90 0.59 0.80 1.0 0.56 0.63 n/a 23-Aug-10 1 Train nta 2

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample. TEF Indicates the Toxic Equivalency Factor TEQ Indicates the Toxic Equivalency

u Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL. n/s Indicates that this compound was not spiked. l indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL. R Indicates that the ion abundance ratio for this compound did not meet the acceptance criterion.

ALS Canada Ltd L918881100901.x!s Approved: B. Reimer --e-signature--

1-Sep-10

Page 3 of 11 

# C-49

# ALS 

# Enuironmental

Sample Analysis Report Sample Name TK19-M23·1 Sampling Date 3-Aug-10 ALS Sample ID L918881-1 Extraction Date 23-Aug-10 Approved: Analysis Method EPA M23 Sample Size 1 Train B. Reimer Analysis Type Sample Percent Moisture nta --e-signature-- Sample Matrix STACK Split Ratio 2 1-Sep-10

Run Information Run 1 Filename 1-100830A S:9 Run Date 30-Aug-10 23:40 Final Volume 20 uL Dilution Factor 1 Analysis Units pg Instrument Column HRMS-1 DB5ms #US95385613H

Ret. Cone. EDL TEF Target Analytes Time pg pg Flags NATO 2,3,7,8-TCDD 28:02 103 1.0 M 1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 32:32 372 3.8 M 0.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 34:42 234 2.8 M 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 34:46 481 3.1 M 0.1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 34:57 783 2.9 M 0.1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 36:40 4850 2.2 0.01 OCDD 38:30 40200 1.1 0.001 2,3,7,8-TCDF 26:39 <36 1.1 M R 0.1 1 ,2, 3, 7 ,8-PeCDF 31:44 14.0 2.3 M J 0.05 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 32:21 <22 2.2 M R 0.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 34:12 <3.0 1.4 M J R 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:17 <6.1 1.3 M J R 0.1 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:38 <3.5 1.4 M J R 0.1 1,2,3, 7,8, 9-HxCDF NotFnd <1.6 1.6 

### u 0.1 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDF 36:02 <6.0 0.71 J R 0.01 1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF Notfnd <0.91 0.91 

### u 0.01 OCDF 38:41 <8.2 0.46 J R 0.001
Field Spike Standards 0 /o Rec Limits 37CI4-2,3, 7,8- TCDD 28:02 90 70-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 34:42 92 70-130

13C12-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 32:21 103 70-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 34:12 93 70-130 13C12-1,2,3.4, 7 ,8,9-HpCDF 37:03 109 70-130
Extraction Standards "'oRee Limits 13C12-2,3,7,8- TCDD 28:00 85 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 32:32 104 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 34:46 99 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 36:40 132 25-130 13C12-0CDD 38:30 81 25-130 13C12-2,3,7,8- TCDF 26:38 97 40-130 13C12-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 31:44 109 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:17 106 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDF 36:01 89 25-130 Cleanup Standard %Ree

13C12·1,2,3, 7 ,8,9-HxCDF 35:09 93 40-130
Cone EDL Homologue Group Totals #peaks pg pg Totai-TCDD 13 1880 1.0 Totai-PeCDD 9 3770 3.8 Totai-HxCDD 8 8210 3.1 Totai-HpCDD 2 9120 2.2

Totai-TCDF 9 141 1.1 Totai-PeCDF 6 82.3 2.3 Totai-HxCDF 1 2.22 1.6 Totai-HpCDF 0 <0.91 0.91

Toxic Equivalency NATO Pll Lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ 528 Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ 544

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample. TEF Indicates the Toxic Equivalency Factor TEQ Indicates the Toxic""'**·u·~"** M Indicates that a peak has been manually Integrated. 

### u Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL

l indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL. R Indicates that the ion al:lundance ratio for this compound did not meet the acceptance criterion.

ALS Canada Ltd L918881 100901.xls Page 4 of 11 

# C-50

# ALS Enuiranmental

Sample Name AlS Sample ID Analysis Method Analysis Type Sample Matrix

Run Information Filename Run Date Final Volume TK19·M23·2 L918881·2 EPA M23 Sample STACK

Run 1 1-100830A 5:10 31-Aug-10 00:22

20 uL 1 pg Dilution Factor Analysis Units Instrument -Column HRMS-1 DB5ms ltUS9538S613H

Ret. Cone. EDL Target Anaiytes Time pg pg Flags 2,3, 7,8- TCDD 28:02 89.2 2.2 M 1,2,3, 7 ,8-PeCDD 32:33 346 12 M 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 34:42 231 15 M 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 34:46 435 17 M 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 34:57 743 16 M 1, 2, 3 ,4, 6, 7 ,8-HpCDD 36:47 4520 4.2 OCDD 38:31 37400 4.3 2,3,7,8-TCDF 26:40 38.1 1.4 1,2,3, 7 ,8-PeCDF 31:45 12.3 4.0 J 2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 32:21 23.0 3.8 1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HxCDF 34:13 7.46 1.5 M J 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:18 <4.2 1.4 M J R 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:39 <2.6 1.5 J R 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 35:10 <1.7 1.7 

### u 1,2,3,4,6, 7 1 8-HpCDF 36:02 4.94 1.4 M J 1,2,3.4, 7,8,9-HpCDF NotFnd <1.8 1.8 

### u OCDF 38:41 12.7 1.1 J
Field Spike Standards %Rec 37CI4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 28:02 88 13C12-1,2,3,4,7 ,8-HxCDD 34:42 100

13C 12-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 32:21 106 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 34:12 121 13C12·1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 37:10 119
Extraction standards %Rec 13C12-2,3,7,8-TCDD 28:00 52 13C12-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 32:33 58 13C12-1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD 34:46 94 13C12-1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDD 36:46 123 13C12-0CDD 38:30 76 13C12-2,3,7,8-TCDF 26:39 50 13C 12·1,2,3, 7 ,8-PeCDF 31:44 56 13C12-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:17 101 13C12-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 36:02 90 Cleanup Standard "'oRee

13C12·1,2,3, 7 ,8, 9-HxCDF 35:09 90
Cone EDL Homologue Group Totals #peaks pg pg Totai-TCDD 16 2070 2.2 Totai-PeCDD 8 4170 12 Totai-HxCDD 

## a 7620 17 Totai-HpCDD 2 8550 4.2

Totai-TCDF 3 129 1.4 Totai·PeCDF 7 127 4.0 Totai-HxCDF 2 14.3 1.7 Totai-HpCDF 2 10.1 1.8

Toxic Equivalency NATO pg Lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ 502 Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ 503 

### Sample Analysis Report Sampling Date Extraction Date Sample Size Percent Moisture Split Ratio

TEF NATO

1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.001
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.001
Limits
70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130
Limits
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130 25-130
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130

40-130 3-Aug-10 23-Aug-10 1 Train 

### nta 2

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample. TEF Indicates the Toxic Equivalency Factor TEQ Indicates the Toxic Equivalency M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated. 

### u Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.
l indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL. R Indicates that the ion abundance ratio for this compound did not meet the acceptance criterion.

ALS Canada Ltd L918881 100901.xls Approved: B. Reimer --e-signature--

1-Sep-10

Page 5 of 11 

# C-51

# ALS Enuironmental

Sample Name ALS Sample ID Analysis Method Analysis Type Sample Matrix

Run Information Filename Run Date Final Volume TK19-M23-3 L918881-3 EPA M23 Sample STACK

Run 1 1-100830A S:ll 31-Aug-10 01:05

20 ul 1 pg Sample Analysis Report Sampling Date Extraction Date Sample Size Percent Moisture Split Ratio

Run 2 1-100901A S:7 1-SEP-10 08:58:: 20 ul 5 pg 4-Aug-10 23-Aug-10 1 Train n/a 2

Dilution Facror Analysis Units Instrument Column HRMS-1 DB5ms #US95385613H HRMS-1 DB5ms #US95385613H

Target Analytes 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3, 7 ,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD OCDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1 ,2,3, 7 ,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6, 7,8-HXCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF OCDF
Field Spike Standards 37CI4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD

13C12-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 13C12·1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF 13C12-1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF
Extraction Standards 13C12-2,3,7,8- TCDD 13C12-1,2,3,7,8·PeCDD 13C12-1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD 13C12-1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD 13C12·0CDD 13C12-2,3,7,8·TCDF 13C12-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 13C12·1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 13C12-1 ,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDF Cleanup Standard

13C12-1,2,3, 7,8, 9-HxCDF

Homologue Group Totals
Totai-TCDD Totai·PeCDD Totai-HxCDD Totai-HpCDD

Totai·TCDF Totai-PeCDF Totai-HxCDF Totai-HpCDF

Toxic Equivalency NATO
Lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ Ret. Time
28:03 32:34 34:43 34:46 34:57 36:57 38:31
26:43 31:44 32:23

38:41

28:04 34:43 32:22**.~** l

28:01 32:33 34:46 36:57 38:31
26:41 31:44 34:17 36:04

35:10

#peaks

15 10 

### s

7 9 Cone. EDL pg pg
89.4 0.99 471 4.1 170 3.1 479 3.4 755 3.2 4980 8.3 42100 3.0
40.8 3.2 13.9 3.2 22.8 3.1**L:~**

.> 10.2 2.2
%Ree

83 75 100

%Rec

49 48 105 111 60
45 57 116 78

0 /o Rec

85
Cone EDL pg pg
2650 0.99 5380 4.1 7760 3.4 9180 8.3 250 3.2 86.2 3.2

pg
573 577 Flags

M M M M

M M M

f'**~~**

M TEF NATO

1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.001
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.001
Limits
70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130
Limits
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130 25-130
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130

40-130 Ret. Cone. EDL Time. pg pg**~J:(:**



### ·:>:::

.. :·; 3: -,:,;:._<.: ·£' NotFnd <8.2 NotFnd <7.5 34:40 <7.9 NotFnd <9.0 36:03 7.78 NotFnd <9.4

0 /o Rec

5) 34:13 126 37:07 114

0 /o Rec**~.·** i

,·;



### ...

,:**;:~** ·.·

.. ,.;**~)**

.. -,;· 

## ·' •"
OJo Recovery

# peaks

2 Cone pg

45.9 13.3**~;>.>** .,:**?.~z**

8.2 7.5 7.9 9.0 7.4 9.4

EDL pg

9.0 9.4 Flags



### u 

### u u u J 

### u

M M**;.~**

EDL lndicatas the Estlmatad Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target In this sample. TEF Indicates the Toxic EQuivalency Factor TEQ Indicates the Toxic Equivalency M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated. U Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL. R Indicates that the ion abundance ratio for this compound did not meet the acceptance criterion.

ALS Canada Ltd L918881100901.xls 

# C-52 B. Reimer --e-signature--

1-Sep-10

Page 6 of 11

# ALS 

# Enuiranmental

Sample Analysis Report Sample Name WD1·M23·1 Sampling Date 5-Aug-10 ALS Sample ID L918881-4 Extraction Date 23-Aug-10 Approved: Analysis Method EPA M23 Sample Size 1 Train B. Reimer Analysis Type Sample Percent Moisture 

### nta --e-signature-- Sample Matrix STACK Split Ratio 2 1-Sep-10

Run Information Run 1 Filename 1-100830A S:12 Run Date 31-Aug-10 01:48 Final Volume 20 uL Dilution Factor 1 Analysis Units pg Instrument -Column HRMS-1 DB5ms #US95385613H

Ret. Cone. EDL TEF Target Analytes Time pg pg Flags NATO 2,3,7,8-TCDD NotFnd <2.5 2.5 

### u 1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 32:35 <3.1 3."1 

### u 0.5 1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HxCDD 34:42 <3.5 2.3 M J R 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 34:46 <9.2 2.5 M J R 0.1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 34:56 <10 2.3 M J R 0.1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 36:38 139 6.2 0.01 OCDD 38:30 1350 1.9 0.001 2,3,7,8-TCDF NotFnd <1.1 1.1 

### u 0.1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF NotFnd <1.2 1.2 

### u 0.05 2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF NotFnd <1.1 1.1 

### u 0.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF NotFnd <0.86 0.86 

### u 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF NotFnd <0.79 0.79 

### u 0.1 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:38 <1.3 0.83 J R 0.1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF NotFnd <0.94 0.94 

### u 0.1 1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDF 36:01 <2.2 0.71 J R 0.01 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF NotFnd <0.91 0.91 

### u 0.01 OCDF 38:39 <1.3 1.1 J R 0.001
Field Spike Standards o/o Rec Limits 37Cl4-2,3,7 ,8- TCDD 28:00 93 70-130 13C12-1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDD 34:42 84 70-130

13C12-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 32:21 119 70-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,7 ,8-HxCDF 34:12 80 70-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 36:59 103 70-130
Extraction Standards %Rec Limits 13C12-2,3,7 ,8-TCDD 27:58 84 40-130 13C12-l,2,3,7 ,8-PeCDD 32:32 94 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 34:46 90 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 36:38 85 25-130 13C12-0CDD 38:29 56 25-130 13Cl2-2,3, 7,8- TCDF 26:37 82 40-130 13Cl2-1, 2,3, 7,8- PeCDF 31:43 82 40-130 13Cl2-1, 2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:17 84 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 36:01 80 25-130 Cleanup Standard 0 /o Rec 13C12-1,2.,3, 7,8, 9-HxCDF 35:09 89 40-130
Cone EDL Homologue Group Totals #peaks pg pg Total-TCDD 0 <2.5 2.5 Totai-PeCDD 2 8.78 3.1 Totai-HxCDD 0 <2.5 2.5 Totai-HpCDD 2 259 6.2

Totai-TCDF 0 <1.1 1.1 Total-PeCDF 0 <1.2 1.2 Total-HxCDF 0 <0.94 0.94 Totai-HpCDF 0 <0.91 0.91

Toxic Equivalency NATO pg Lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ 2.74 Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ 10.2

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample. TEF Indicates the Toxic Equivalency Factor TEQ Indicates the Toxic Equivalency M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated. 

### u Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL. R Indicates that the ion abundance ratio for this compound did not meet the acceptance criterion.

ALS Canada Ltd L918881100901.xls Page 7 of 11 

# C-53Sample Name ALS Sample ID Analysis Method Analysis Type Sample Matrix

Run Information Filename Run Date Final Volume Dilution Factor Analysis Units Instrument

- Column

Target Analytes 2,3,7,8-TCDD 1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 1,2,3,7 ,8,9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD OCDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF OCDF
Field Spike Standards 37CI4-2,3,7,8-TCDD 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD

13C12-2,3,4,7 ,8-PeCDF 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 13C12-1,2,3,4,7 ,8,9-HpCDF
Extraction Standards 13C12-2,3,7,8-TCDD 13C12-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 13C12-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 13C12-1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 13C12-0CDD 13C12-2,3,7,8- TCDF 13C12-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 13C12·1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 13C12·1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Cleanup Standard

13C12-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF

Homologue Group Totals
Totai-TCDD Totai-PeCDD Totai-HxCDD Totai-HpCDD

Totai-TCDF Totai-PeCDF Totai-HxCDF 

# ALS Enuiranmental

WD1-M23-2 L918881-5 EPA M23 Sample STACK

Run 1
1-100830A 5:13 31-Aug-10 02:30

20 ul 1 pg HRMS-1 DBSms #US95385613H

Ret. Cone. EDL Time pg pg Flags
28:03 <4.8 2.5 M R 32:34 <5.7 1.9 M J R NotFnd <1.9 1.9 

### u 34:45 <8.4 2.1 J R 34:55 <9.7 1.9 J R 36:39 76.9 3.5 38:30 711 3.6
NotFnd <1.1 1.1 

### u Notfnd <1.6 1.6 

### u NotFnd <1.5 1.5 

### u NotFnd <0.60 0.60 

### u NotFnd <0.55 0.55 

### u NotFnd <0.58 0.58 

### u NotFnd <0.65 0.65 

### u 36:02 <1.7 0.67 J R Notfnd <0.86 0.86 

### u NotFnd <1.3 1.3 

### u
%Rec
28:01 93 34:42 107 32:21 108 34:12 98 37:00 97
%Rec
27:59 87 32:32 115 34:46 89 36:39 94 38:30 56
26:38 86 31:43 119 34:17 94 36:01 84
%Rec
35:09 92
Cone EDL #peaks pg pg
0 <2.5 2.5 4 16.7 1.9 1 23.7 2.1 2 142 3.5 0 <1.1 1.1 0 <1.6 1.6 0 <0.65 0.65 

### Sample Analysis Report Sampling Date Extraction Date Sample Size Percent Moisture Spilt Ratio

TEF NATO

1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.001

0.1 0.05 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.001
Limits
70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130
Limits
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130 25-130
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130

40-130 5-Aug-10 23-Aug-10 1 Train n/a 2

Totai-HpCDF 0 <0.86 0.86

Toxic Equivalency NATO Pll Lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ 1.48 Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ 12.3

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Lim1t, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample. TEF Indicates the Toxic Equivalency Factor TEQ Indicates the Toxic Equivalency M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated. 

### u Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL. R Indicates that the ion abundance ratio for this compound did not meet the acceptance criterion.

ALS Canada Ltd L918881100901.xls 

# C-54 Approved: B. Reimer --e-slgnature--

1-Sep-10

Page 

## a of 11

# ALS Enuiranmental

Sample Name ALS Sample ID Analysis Method Analysis Type Sample Matrix

Run Information
Fi!ename Run Date Final Volume Dilution Factor WD1·M23·3 L918881-6 EPA M23 Sample STACK

Run 1 1-100830A S:14 31-Aug-10 03:13

20 uL 1 pg Ana lysis Units Instrument Column HRMS-1 DB5ms #US95385613H

Ret. Cone. EDL Target Analytes Time pg pg Flags 2,3,7,8-TCDD NotFnd <2.8 2.8 

### u 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 32:33 7.31 1.1 M J 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 34:43 6.95 1.8 M J 1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD 34:46 <7.1 2.0 M J R 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD 34:57 <18 1.8 M J R 1,2,3,4,6, 7,8-HpCDD 36:38 192 6.8 OCDD 38:30 2170 3.2 2,3,7,8-TCDF NotFnd <1.6 1.6 

### u 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF NotFnd <2.0 2.0 

### u 2,3,4, 7 ,8-PeCDF NotFnd <2.0 2.0 

### u 1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF 34:12 1.68 0.94 J 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF NotFnd <0.86 0.86 

### u 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF NotFnd <0.91 0.91 

### u**1~2~3,** 7 ,8,9-HxCDF NotFnd <l.O 1.0 

### u 1,2,3,4,6,7 ,8-HpCDF NotFnd <1.1 1.1 

### u 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF NotFnd <1.4 1.4 

### u OCDF 38:40 <2.2 0.97 J R
Field Spike Standards o/oRec 37C14-2,3, 7,8- TCDD 28:00 90 13C12-1,2,3,4, 7 ,8-HxCDD 34:42 77

13C12-2,3,4, 7,8-PeCOF 32:21 116 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 34:12 107 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF 37:00 100
Extraction Standards 0 /o Rec 13C12-2,3, 7,8- TCDD 27:58 80 13C12-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 32:32 95 13C12-1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HxCDD 34:45 87 13C12-1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDD 36:38 100 13C12-0CDD 38:30 65 13C12-2,3,7,8- TCDF 26:37 82 13Cl2-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 31:43 83 13C12-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 34:17 79 1302-1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDF 36:01 80 Cleanup Standard o/oRec

13C12-1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF 3S:09 85
Cone EDL Homologue Group Totals #peaks pg pg Totai-TCDD 0 <2.8 2.8 Totai-PeCDD 

## s 28.8 1.1 Totai-HxCDD 2 54.1 2.0 Totai-HpCDD 2 352 6.8

Totai-TCDF 0 <1.6 1.6 Totai-PeCDf 0 <2.0 2.0 Totai-HxCDF 1 1.68 1.0 Totai-HpCDF 0 <1.4 1.4

Toxic Equivalency NATO pg lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ 8.61 Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ 15.5 

### Sample Analysis Report Sampling Date Extraction Date Sample Size Percent Moisture Split Ratio

TEF NATO

1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.001
0.1 0.05 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.001

Limits
70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130
Limits
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130 25-130
40-130 40-130 40-130 2S-130

40-130 6-Aug-10 23-Aug-10 1 Train n/a 2

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample. TEF Indicates the Toxic Equivalency Factor TEQ Indicates the Toxic Equivalency M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated. 

### u Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

J indicates that 

### a target analyte was detected below the LQL. R Indicates that the lon abundance ratio for this compound did not meet the acceptance criterion.

ALS Canada Ltd L918881 100901 .xis Approved: B. Reimer --e-signature--

1-Sep-10

Page 9 of 11 

# C-55

# ALS 

# Enuiranmental
Sample Analysis Report sample Name TK19·M23 FIELD BLANK Sampling Date 4-Aug-10

. ALS Sample ID L918881·7 Extraction Date 23-Aug-10 Approved: Analysis Method EPA M23 Sample Size 1 Train B. Reimer Analysis Type Sample Percent Moisture n/a ·-e-signature-- Sample Matrix STACK Split Ratio 2 1-Sep-10

Run Information Run 1 Filename 1-100830A S:8 Run Date 30-Aug-10 22:57 Final Volume 20 uL Dilution Factor 1 Analysis Units pg Instrument

- Column HRMS-1 DB5ms #US95385613H

Ret. Cone. EDL TEF Target Analytes Time pg pg Flags NATO 2,3, 7,8- TCDD NotFnd <1.0 1.0 

### u 1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD NotFnd <0.79 0.79 

### u 0.5 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD NotFnd <0.72 0.72 

## u 0.1 1,2,3,6, 7 ,8-HxCDD NotFnd <0.79 0.79 

## u 0.1 1,2 1 3 1 7,8,9-HxCDD NotFnd <0.74 0.74 

## u 0.1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 36:39 <6.1 1.0 J R 0.01 OCDD 38:30 125 1.1 0.001 2,3,7,8-TCDF NotFnd <0.79 0.79 

## u 0.1 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF NotFnd <1.0 1.0 

### u 0.05 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF NotFnd <0.99 0.99 

### u 0.5 1,2,3,4, 7,8-HxCDF NotFnd <0.58 0.58 

### u 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF NotFnd <0.53 0.53 

### u 0.1 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF NotFnd <0.56 0.56 

### u 0.1 1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF NotFnd <0.63 0.63 

## u 0.1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF NotFnd <0.42 0.42 

## u 0.01 1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF NotFnd <0.54 0.54 

### u 0.01 OCDF NotFnd <0.78 0.78 

### u 0.001
Field Spike Standards %Rec Limits 37CI4·2,3,7,8·TCDD 28:01 96 70-130 13Cl2·1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD 34:42 76 70·130

13C12·2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 32:22 111 70-130 13C12·1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 34:12 102 70-130 13C12·1,2,3,4, 7,8,9-HpCDF 36:59 98 70-130
Extraction Standards 0 AI Rec Limits 13Cl2-2,3,7,8-TCDD 27:59 109 40-130 13C12·1,2,3,7,8·PeCDD 32:33 125 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD 34:46 102 40-130 13C12·1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD 36:38 83 25·130 13C12-0CDD 38:29 60 25·130 13C12-2,3,7,8-TCDF 26:38 96 40·130 13C12-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDF 31:44 123 40·130 13C12-1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDF 34:17 88 40-130 13C12-1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDF 36:01 83 25-130 Cleanup Standard %Rec

13C12·1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF 35:09 83 40·130
Cone EDL Homologue Group Totals #peaks pg pg Totai-TCDD 0 <1.0 1.0 Totai-PeCDD 0 <0.79 0.79 Totai·HxCDD 1 3.34 0.79 Totai-HpCDD 0 <1.0 1.0

Totai-TCDF 0 <0.79 0.79 Totai-PeCDF 0 <1.0 1.0 Totai-HxCDF 0 <0.63 0.63 Totai-HpCDF 0 <0.54 0.54

Toxic Equivalency NATO pg Lower Bound PCDD/F TEQ 0.125 Upper Bound PCDD/F TEQ 2.67

EDL Indicates the Estimated Detection Limit, based on the measured background noise for this target in this sample. TEF Indicates the Toxic Equivalency Factor TEQ Indicates the Toxic EqUivalency



### u Indicates that this compound was not detected above the MDL.

J indicates that a target analyte was detected below the LQL. R Indicates that the ion abundance ratio for this compound did not meet the acceptance criterion.

ALS Canada Ltd L916661100901.xls Page 10 of 11 

# C-56Sample Name ALS Sample lD Analysis Method Analysis Type Sample Matrix

Run Information Filename Run Date Final Volume Dilution Factor Analysis Units Instrument

- Column

Target Analytes 2,3, 7,8- TCDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD 1,2,3,4, 7,8-HXCDD 1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDD 1,2,3, 7 ,8, 9-HxCDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD OCDD 2,3, 7,8- TCDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 2,3,4, 7,8-PeCDF 1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3,6,7,8-HXCDF 2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF 1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF 1,2,3,4, 7,8, 9-HpCDF OCDF
Field Spike Standards 37CI4-2,3,7,8·TCDD 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD

13C12-2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF 13C12·1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF 13C12-1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Extraction Standards 13C12-2,3,7,8- TCDD 13C12-1,2,3, 7,8-PeCDD 13C12-1,2,3,6, 7,8-HxCDD 13C12-1,2,3,4,6, 7 ,8-HpCDD 13C12-0CDD 13C12·2,3,7,8-TCDF 13C12-1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF 13C12·1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF 13C12·1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF Cleanup Standard

13C12-1,2,3, 7,8,9-HxCDF 

# ALS Enuironmental
Laboratory Control Sample 

### Analysis Report Laboratory Control Sample WG1153131-2 EPA M23 LCS QC

Run 1 1-100830A S:4 30-Aug-10 20:06

20 uL 1 %Rec HRMS-1 DBSms #US95385613H

Ret. Time %Rec Flags
28:01 89 32:33 96 (:;(5 34:46 115 34:57 90 36:39 93 38:30 91
26:40 92 31:44 94 32:22 96 34:13 93 34:18 104

35:10 92 36:02 94 37:00 77 38:40 97

0 /o Rec

nfs n/s n/s n/s n/s
%Rec
27:59 90 32:33 105 34:46 101 36:38 80 38:30 49
26:38 88 31:43 93 34:17 80 36:01 83

0 /o Rec
35:09 70 Limits
70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130
70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70-130
Limits

Limits
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130 25-130
40-130 40-130 40-130 25-130

40-130 Sampling Date Extraction Date Sample Size Percent Moisture Split Ratio

Run 2 1-100901A 5:3 1-SEP-10 06:07:! 20 uL 5 o/o Rec nfa 23-Aug-10 1 n/a 2

HRMS-1 DB5ms #US95385613H

Ret. Time. 0 /o Rec Flags

34:47 92 28M

34:39 101 33

%Rec

0 /o Rec

%Recovery

nfs Indicates that this compound was not spiked M Indicates that a peak has been manually integrated.

ALS Canada Ltd L91BBB1 100901.xls Approved: 

### B. Reimer --e-signature--

1-Sep-10

Page11of11 

# C-570I(.11(X)CLIENT:LOCATION:SAMPLEDATES:ANALYSIS:METHOD:IdentificationTK19-M29-1TK19-M29-1TK19-M29-2TK19-M29-2TK19-M29-3TK19-M29-3AcetoneBlankFilterBlankSBE-M5-1SBE-M5-1SBE-M5-2SBE-M5-2SBE-M5-3SBE-M5-3AcetoneBlank-----FILTERPWFILTERPWFILTERPWPWFILTERFILTERPWFILTERPWFILTERPWPWANALYTICALSUMMARYKohlerKohler,WI8/3-8/5/2010ParticulatesUSEPAMethods5SolventMass(g)Tare-779.0113.1107493.6-779.0147107583.3-779.1141.8113383.7114.5108305.5-782.4-777.088.9114537.2779.969.3111684.1-773.779.5113264.289.9118607.6WT1WT2794.8794.5107497.2107497.1795.1794.8107587.0107587.3794.3793.9113386.4113386.1108306.6108306.4783.0782.9784.5784.3114542.0114542.3788.5788.2111687.5111687.8781.4781.0113267.8113267.6118607.6 118607.5WT1-WT2(mg)0.300.100.30-0.300.400.300.200.100.20-0.300.30-0.300.400.200.10ParticulateBlankCorrectedTotalM5(mg)15.653.5515.953.8515.002.551.000.557.404.958.453.557.503.50-0.05Particulate{mg)Particulate(mg)-18.212.56--18.522.57--16.311.31------12.354.95--12.003.55--11.003.50---Analyst:E.VogtDateofCompletion:8/21/10

# --- 

# - - 

# - - .., 

# ___ _ - 

# __ ...... 

# _ 

# -- =
.... = 

# -- _._.- 

# .......... 'f/ff"ENV/RONMENTAL,.. !NO. 

# METHOD DETECTION LIMIT DETERMINATION Document Number: G032

Revision Number: 

# 1.0 Effective Date: 

# 05/01/10 Page Number: 

# 1 of 6



# PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINATION OF METHOD DETECTION LIMIT

1.0 PURPOSE: To establish a procedure for the determination of method detection limit (MDL) for an analytical procedure.

2.0 SUMMARY: The MDL is determined from analysis of a sample in a given matrix type containing the analyte. MDL is defined as the minimum concentration of an analyte (greater than zero) that can be measured and reported at a 99% confidence level.

3.0 POLICIES:

3.1 MDL determinations are not required, if data is not reported below the level of the lowest calibration standard.

3.2 MDLs are required on all compliance tests, if data is reported below the level of the lowest calibration standard.**~** 

# 3.3 All data reported below the limit of quantitation must be 

# G) flagged on the report.

4.0 SAFETY ISSUES: Each employee must adhere to safety requirements specified in each of the methods or standard operating procedures and to safety requirements outlined in the laboratory health and safety manual.

5.0 PROCEDURE: Follow the procedure below.


# 5.1 Obtain reagent blank material of the same matrix as the sample.

5.2 Determine the spiking level for the MDL study. This may include:

a. the level of the lowest calibration standard,

b. a level either 

# 1/5 to 

# 1/10 the level of the lowest calibration standard, or

c. any level determined to be above three times the signal to noise ratio obtained by setting the area reject to zero and averaging the baseline plus three times the standard deviation of all the area detects.

5.3 Prepare at least eight replicates of this sample and carry it through the entire analytic procedure. This must be done for every sample matrix to be analyzed using this method.

5.4 Analyze the replicates as samples.

5.5 The MDL is calculated using the following procedure as an example:
Eight samples are prepared at 0.10 ppmv and analyzed following the method.

Procedure For Determination of Method Detection Limit C-59

# --- 

# - - 

# - 

# - ------ - 

# __ ...._._ 

# -;::;; 

# -- - =
....... = 

# ___ ._._ 

# ........... Y'ENVIRONMENrAJ.. 

### Y" /NO.



# The results are as follows:

0.102 0.103 0.107 0.109 0.107 0.094 0.089 0.099



# Determine the mean value: METHOD DETECTION LIMIT DETERMINATION Document Number: G032

Revision Number: 1.0 Effective Date: 05/01/10 Page Number: 2 of 6

(0.102+0.103+0.107+0.109+0.107+0.094+0.089+0.099) 

# = 0.81/8 

# = 0.10125 

# 8 Determine the sum of the squares (0.102)A2 

# = 0.010404 (0.103)A2 

# = 0.010609 (0.107)A2 

# = 0.011449 (0.109)A2 

# = 0.011881 (0.107)A2 

# = 0.011449 (0.094)A2 

# = 0.008836 (0.089)A2 

# = 0.007921 (0.099)A2 = + 0.009801 0.08235



# Determine the square of the mean value

0.10125A2: 0.010252



# Determine the average mean square sum

0.010252 X 8 replicates 

# = 0.082013


# Subtract the average mean square sum from the sum of the squares

0.08235- 0.082013 

# = 0.000338



# Divide this number by the number of replicates minus one
0.000338/ (8-1) = 0.00008421429



# Take the square root of the value obtained
(0.00008421429) "0.5 

# = 0.006943651 (rounded to 9 figures)



# The above value is the Standard Deviation

C,§r<6cedure For Determination of Method Detection Limit

# --- 

# - - 

# - - _. 

# ___ _**~-** 

# -...-- 

# -- =
...... = 

# -

__ .__ 

# ........... 'fiJI" ENVIRONMENTAL,.. INC. 

# METHOD DETECTION LIMIT DETERMINATION Document Number: G032

Revision Number: 1.0 Effective Date: 05/01/10 Page Number: 3 of 6

Note: You may use a calculator or Excel Spreadsheet to do this math as long as the calculator or spreadsheet function has been verified to give the same value.

Note: Excel from office 2000, 2003, and 2005 have been determined to calculate the mean and standard deviation using the internal function for these calculations. This was done while writing this document.

Tables of Student's "t" Values at the 

# 99 Percent Confidence Level

Number of Replicates Degree of Freedom



# 7 

# 8 9 10 (ni)

6 

# 7 

# 8 9 

# t (n-i)

3.143 2.998 2.897 2.821

Multiply the Standard Deviation times the t-values obtained from the table above to give the MDL 99% value.

0.006943651 X 2.998 

# = 0.020817066

The MDL determined above is 0.021 ppmv with 99% confidence that it is statistically different than a blank sample.

If the level you ran the eight replicates is less than this value, you must repeat the entire study with a higher concentration.
Example: If this had been determined by running eight replicates at 0.010 ppmv, the study is invalid.

If the level you chose to run the MDL study is less than five times this value, nothing more needs to be done. You can report data at the 0.10 ppmv MDL if it meets the clients needs. The final verification step has been done by the eight replicates of the study.

If the MDL result obtained is less than five times the value you ran the study at, you must re-run the study to use it.
Example: If you had run eight replicates at 0.10 ppmv and you obtained a MDL of 0.0098

0.10/0.0098 = 10.204 10.204 is greater than 5 times the study spiked level.

You must re-run the MDL study at a lower spiked level to claim a MDL less than 0.020 ppmv for eight replicates spiked at 0.10 ppmv.

Procedure For Determination of Method Detection Limit C-61

# --- 

# - - 

# - -


# ------ -**--~-** 

# -- = = ="'L 

# = 

# ........... ..,.ENVIRONMENTAL

..... INC. 

# METHOD DETECTION LIMIT DETERMINATION Document Number: G032

Revision Number: 1.0 Effective Date: 05/01/10 Page Number: 4 of 6

You may however verify a MDL of 0.020 ppmv, if this is acceptable to the client's needs and/or the intended use of the data. However, the true MDL is actually less than this level.

To verify the MDL you must prepare at least one sample taken through all the method sample preparation steps and run it to verify that the instrument actually sees this as a detect.

Example: For the above study with 0.021 as the calculated MDL, a sample was prepared at 0.025 ppmv and was taken through all the preparation steps. It was injected and a peak was detected by the instrument. 0.025 ppmv is now the reporting usable MDL.

After this verification step, data may be reported down to the verified MDL level. However, values below the level of the lowest calibration standard must still be J flagged as estimated values.

5.6 Responsibilities: The lab manager and quality assurance manager are responsible for reviewing all data generated and evaluating the validity of the each MDL. Original copies of raw data and final results must be filed for record keeping.

5.7 Comments: MDLs should meet recommended method expectations. MDLs that meet manufacturer's expectations and method expectations, but not regulatory limits may not be acceptable for determination of regulatory compliance. An MDL that does not meet a method or instrument expectation, but meets a particular regulatory requirement, may be an acceptable method for the determination of regulatory compliance.

6.0 Definitions: Other definitions related to the MDL

Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) (EQL): The level of analyte that can be reliably achieved within specified limits of precision and accuracy during routine lab analysis. The POL has been estimated to be two to five times the MDL.

Limit of Quantitation (LOQ): The level of the lowest calibration standard on the calibration curve. This is the same as the Method Ouantitation Limit (MOL)

Limit of Detection (LOD): Defined as the lowest concentration level that can be reported with 99% confidence that an analyte has been detected and is statistically different than a blank non detect.

Instrument Detection Limit (IDL): Defined as a concentration that produces a signal greater that three times the standard deviation of the mean noise level of the instrument. No sample preparation steps are required. It can be determined in the same manner as an MDL, but delete sample preparation steps (digestion or distillation). An IDL may be one half to one fourth of its MDL. If there are no sample preparation steps, the MDL and the IDL are essentially the same.

C,9fbcedure For Determination of Method Detection Limit

# --- 

# - - 

# - - ------ ------- -;:::;;- 

# -

..**==~** 

# = 

# -----.-

.... = = ,... • ..,.ENVIRONMENTAl.

... INC. 

# METHOD DETECTION LIMIT DETERMINATION Document Number: G032

Revision Number: 1.0 Effective Date: 05/01/1 0 Page Number: 5 of 6

Method Quantitation Limit (MQL): Lowest point on the calibration curve.


# 7.0 REFERENCES:

7.1 40CFR, Chapter 

# I, Part 136, Appendix 

# B

7.2 Section 1030E. Method Detection Limit- Standard Methods For The Examination of Water and Wastewater, 7th Edition, 1989, APHA-AVVWA-WPCF.

7.3 Section 1.3- Method Detection Limit

- From Chapter 1, Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods (SW-846), Third Edition, Revision 1, December 1987, USEPA and updates.

Procedure For Determination of Method Detection Limit 

# C-63

# C-64 Detection Limits Study Calculations

Instrument: Analytical Balance Manufacturer: Ohaus Model: Adventurer SL S/N: 8028221256 Date: 2/13/2010 Operator: D. 

### Chapman Compound: PM Measurement units: 

### milligrams Comments : Troemner ASTM/NIST Weights

minimum of 8 

### 4 

## 5 6 7 8 9 

### 10 11 12 

### 13 14 

## 15

Total Population t-Test Population (n-1) Average RM reading Standard Deviation Student t- Test Value

LOD LOQ

LOD =Limit of detection (same as MDL • method detction limit) 

### ,000. 1,000.1 1,000.0 1,000.1 1,000.0 1,000.1 1,000.0 1 000.1 1,000.1 1,000.1 1,000.0 1,000.1 1,000.2 1,000.1 1,000.1



## 15 14 1,000.080

0.056 2.624

LOQ = Limit of quantitation (same as PQL ·practical quantitation limit)

LOD =Student's t value x the standard deviation

The US EPA defines LOD (MDL) as "the minimum concentration that can be determined with 99% confidence that the true concentration is greater than zero." This procedure is outlined in 40CFR 136 and TTN EMC**studooft~Tesl:Natues.2..S!ded** 

### 99% Confidence.·: 

## t-restPoputation · · · t,Testvatue 7 2.998 8 2.896 9 2.821 10 2.764 11 2.718 12 2.681 13 2.650 14 2.624

# - Detection Limits Study Calculations

Instrument: Analytical Balance Manufacturer: Ohaus Model: Adventurer SL SIN: 8028221256 Date: 2/13/2010 Operator: D. 

### Chapman Compound: PM Measurement units: 

### milligrams Comments : Troemner ASTM/NIST Weights

minimum of 8 population 

### 2 3 4 5 

### 6 

## 7 8

10 11 12 13 14 15

Total Population t-Test Population (n-1) Average RM reading Standard Deviation Student t- Test Value

LOD LOQ

LOD =Limit of detection (same as MDL -method detction limit) 

### 100,000.0 100,000.0 100,000.0 100,000.0 100,000.0 100,000.1 000. 1 1 100,000.0 100,000.0 100,000.0 100,000.0 100,000.1 100 1

15 14 100,000.033 0.049 2.624

LOQ 

# = Limit of quantitation (same as PQL practical quantitation limit)

LOD =Student's t value x the standard deviation

The US EPA defines LOD (MDL) as "the minimum concentration that can be determined with 99% confidence that the true concentration is greater than zero." This procedure is outlined in 40CFR 136 and TTN EMC**,stud~MestValulis.2-Sided99%** 

## Coqfld,en.ce ;

... ,,· •

·**t-T~t** 

### P<:>pulatlon · ·**t~re~.Vtilue** 

### · .... ·. · 7 2.998 8 2.896 9 2.821 10 2.764 11 12 13 14 2.718 2.681 2.650 2.624


# C-65

# -

C-66 Detection Limits Study Calculations

Instrument: Analytical Balance Manufacturer: Ohaus Model: Adventurer SL SIN: 8028221256 Date: 2/13/2010 Operator: 

## D. Chapman Compound: 

## PM Measurement units: 

### milligrams Comments : Troemner ASTM/NIST Weights

minimumof8 

### 2 3 ,4

5 6 

### 7 

### 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Total Population t-Test Population (n-1) Average 

## RM reading Standard Deviation Student t- Test Value

LOD LOQ

LOD =Limit of detection (same as MDL. method detction limit) 

### 200,000.0 200,000.0 200,000.1 200,000.0 200,000.0 200,000.0 000.0 200,000.0 200,000.0 200,000.0 200,000.0 200,000.0 200,000.0

15 14 200,000.013 0.035 2.624

LOQ =Limit of quantitation (same as PQL- practical quantitation limit)

LOD =Student's t value x the standard deviation

The USEPA defines LOD (MDL) as "the minimum concentration that can be determined with 99% confidence that the true concentration is greater than zero." This procedure is outlined in 40CFR 136 and TTN EMC**StudimJ·.N~tVall.l:S2-Sided99% yoofide~~·**  

### '(+ 

### t-Testf'opulatlpn · .. FFestVaiUe 7 2.998 8 2.896 9 2.821 10 2.764 11 2.718 12 2.681 13 2.650 14 2.624

# Detection Limits Study Calculations

Instrument: Dionex ICS-1000 Anions S/N: 

## Condition: Instrument Only Date: 

## 3/18/2009 Operator: E. Vogt 

## Compound: Flouride Measurement units: J..LQ/ml Comments:

minimumof8 

## 1 2 3 4 5 6 

## 7 8 9 

## 10 

## 11 12 13 

## 14 15

Total Population t-Test Population (n-1) Average RM reading Standard Deviation Student t- Test Value

LOD LOQ (3 times LOD)

L OD =Limit of detection (same as MDL -method detction limit) 

## 0.089 0.086 0.094 0.086 0.085 0.094 0.094 0.089 0.087 0.091

10 9 

## 0.090 

## 0.004 

## 2.821

0.010 0.030

LOQ =Limit of quantitation (same as PQL practical quantitation limit)

LOD =Student's t value x the standard deviation LOQ 

# = LOD x 3

The USEPA defines LOD (MDL) as "the minimum concentration that can be determined with 

### 99% confidence that the true concentration 

### is greater than zero

... This procedure 

### is outlined in 40CFR 136 and TTN EMC

Student t-Test Values 2-Sided 99% Confidence t-Test Population t-Test Value 7 2.998 

### 8 2.896 9 2.821 10 2.764 11 2.718 12 2.681 13 2.650 14 2.624 

# C-67()

I 0'> C» Detection Limit Study Flouride Determination

Std. 0.0 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 Pre Cal **(~tS'min)** 0.00 Calibration Curve Calculation

Post Cal Average (pS*min) 0.00 0.088 0.181 0.374 0.958 **(~tS*min)** 0.00 0.088 0.181 0.374 0.958

Sample Concentration Calculations

ID Analysis 1 Concentration

(area counts) (f.lg/ml)

Injection 82 0.0170 0.089

Injection 83 0.0164 0.086

Injection 84 0.0180 0.094

Injection 85 0.0165 0.086

Injection 86 0.0163 0.085

Injection 87 0.0180 0.094

Injection 88 0.0179 0.094

InJection 89 0.0169 0.089

i

Injection

90 0.0166 0.087 I

Injection 91 0.0173 0.091

I Flouride

Cone. Ug/ml Peak Area RE

0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0 mean RF-----> 0.088 0.181 0.374 0.958 0.1843 Analyst: E. Vogt

Date Done: 03/19/10 0.176 0.181 0.187 0.192

Flouride Calibration Curve

=- 6.0

E 0, 5.0 ::t :4.0

s:::: 8

3.0
**~** 2.0
"t: :::3 1.0

0 u:: 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 uS*min 0.8 y = 5.237x

R 2 = 1.000 1.0 1.2 Cal Cone 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.2 % Dif -4.30 -1.58 1.69 4.19

# Detection Limits Study Calculations

Instrument: Dionex ICS-1 000 Anions SIN: Condition: Instrument Only 

### Date: 

## 3/18/2009 Operator: E. Vogt 

### Compound: Chloride Measurement units: f.lg/ml Comments:

minimumofB 

## 2 3 4 5 

## 6 7 

## 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15



### Total Population t-Test Population (n-1) Average RM reading Standard Deviation Student t- 

### Test Value

LOD LOQ (3 times LOD)

LOD =Limit of detection (same as 

### MDL- method deletion limit) 

## 0.137 0.169 0.168 0.186 0.198 0.198 0.119 0.166 0.195

10 9 0.169 

### 0.027 2.821



## 0.076 0.229

LOQ 

### = Limit of quantitation (same as 

### PQL ·practical quantitation limit)

LOD Student's t value x the standard deviation LOQ 

### = LODx 3

The USEPA defines LOD (MDL) 

### as "the minimum concentration that can be determined with 

### 99% confidence that the true concentration 

### is greater than zero." This procedure 

### is outlined in 4QCFR 136 and TTN EMC



### Student t-Test Values 2-Sided 99% Confidence t-Test Population t-Test Value 7 

### 2.998 8 2.896 9 

### 2.821 10 2.764 11 2.718 12 2.681 13 2.650 14 2.624 

# C-69()

I -....! 0 Detection Limit Study Chloride Determination

Std. (pg/ml) 00 05 1 0 2.0 5.0 Pre Cal **{~tS*min)** 0.00 Calibration Curve Calculation

Post Cal Average {pS*min) 0.00 0.068 0.147 0.261 0.658 **{~tS*min)** 0.00 0.068 0.147 0.261 0.658

Sample Concentration Calculations

10 Analysis 1 Concentration

(area counts) (!J.g/ml)

Injection 82 0.0196 0.149

Injection 83 0.0180 0.137

Injection 84 0.0222 0.169

InJection 85 0.0221 0.168

Injection 86 0.0245 0.186

Injection 87 0.0261 0.198

InJection 88 0.0261 0.198

Injection 89 0.0157 0.119

InJection 90 0.0218 0.166

.. . Injection 91 ·- 0.0256 **0.1~§_ ~-**  Cone. Ug/ml Peak Area

0.5 0.068

1.0 0.147

2.0 0.261

5.0 0.658

mean RF-----> 0.1357 Analyst: E. Vogt

Date Done: 03/19/1 0 Chloride RE 0.135 0.146 0.130 0.131

Chloride Calibration Curve

E 0, 5.0
::t. -:- 4.0

(..) 1: 0 3.0

u **~** 2.0 'i: 0 1.0
..r:: u 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 uS*min 0.5 y = 7.603x

R 2 = 0.999
0.6 0.7

·-·.. ·------· ... J Cal Cone % Dif

0.5 -0.20

1.1 7.87

1.9 -4.24

4.8 -3.43

### Operator:Administrator Tim ebase :ICS _1 000 _Anions Sequence:AN IONS 03-1 0 Page 1-10 3/19/2010 9:25 AM


# 82 0.1 

# ppm F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.· DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min):

4.00

3.0


# 1 2.00-J

# 1.00~ '

No.

1 

### 2 3 4 

## Total: Ret. Time min 4.25 6.05 13.45 16.92 

## Valero Hartley 1 

## standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 12:15 18.50

Administrator



## Peak Name 

## Height 

## llS Flouride 0.086 Chloride 0.104 Phosphate 0.008 Sulfate 0.024 0.222

SulfateArea/lntegration 

## Area llS*min

0.0170 0.0196 0.0029 0.0115

0.051 

## Injection Volume: 

## 35.0 Channel: 

## ECD_1 Wavelength: 

## n.a. Bandwidth: 

## n.a. Dilution Factor: 

## 1.0000 Sample Weight: 

## 1.0000 Sample Amount: 

## 1.0000

ECD 1

3 - Phosphate • 1 ?.44?- Sulfate • 

### ' min 

### 12.5 15.0 

### 19 0

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-71

# C-72 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 

## 2-10 3/19/201 0 9:25 AM


# 83 0.1 ppm 

# F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.
- DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quanti!. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Valero Hartley 1 

## standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 12:35 18.50

Administrator

2.00l 

# j l i 

# 1.oo-j

# ~ j 

# j_

__ ___,**~~ct~ ~t!li:Jride-**  6.050 

# 1 I/ I

. I i 

### It 

### -0.50 ° I 

# o:o 2.5



## No. Ret. Time I 

### 5.0



## Peak Name I 

### 7.5


## Height I 

### 10.0



## Area min us uS*min 1 4.25 Flouride 

### 0.085 0.0164 2 6.05 Chloride 

### 0.096 0.0180 3 13.50 Phosphate 

### 0.007 0.0028 4 16.93 Sulfate 

### 0.024 0.0119 

## Total: 0.211 0.049

Sulf ateArea/1 ntegr a !ion 

## Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a. n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

3 • Phosphate • 1 j3.497' Sulfate .\

. 1 

### minj

I 

### 12.5 15.0 19.0

Chromeleon (C) 

### Dionex 

### 1996-2001 Version 

### 6.60 Build 

### 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 3-10 3/19/2010 9:25AM



# 84 0.1 ppm F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.

K 

# DL

Client 

## Valero Hartley Vial Number: 

## 1 Sample Type: 

## standard Control Program: 

## Anions 1000 Quantif. Method: 

## ICS_1000_Anions Recording Time: 

## 3/18/2010 12:54 Run Time (min}: 

## 18.50 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

---··--· ---··· ----····----··· 

### ----··- ------------·-·······-··-·· -···-···-·-·· ·----···· 

### ·-··----- 

### Administrator 

### ECD 1

4.00

# 300~ 

# i

2.00l


# J

I 

### 1.00---j

# ~ 

# t l , 1

-

# FlouridJ~-~--~!P-f-id_e_-_**·_ 05** **0**

_____ ---'· 3. Phosphate

# -13.4~ Sulfate- 

# l**\/~ ~I**  J• I t

# mi~ -0.50-+ 1 --.--,---.-,---.,---'+-1**---r--r--..----;--r---,-~,..--,---,-~-,---r---r--,--.,---,-**

### 1**-~,--,-,-,---.-,---,---,---c-l** 

### 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 19.0



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height Area 

## min**~s** 

## 1-iS*min 1 4.24 Flouride 0.087 0.0180 2 6.05 Chloride 0.118 0.0222 3 13.43 Phosphate 0.008 0.0030 4 

### 16.92 Sulfate 0.023 0.0101 

## Total: 0.235 0.053

SulfateArea/lntegration Chrorneleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-73

# C-74 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 000_ Anions Sequence:AN IONS 03-1 0 Page 4-10 3/19/2010 9:25AM


# 85 0.1 ppm 

# F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.
- 

# Dl

Client 

## Valero Hartley Vial Number: 

## 1 Sample Type: 

## standard Control Program: 

## Anions 1000 Quantif. Method: 

## ICS_1000_Anions Recording Time: 

## 3/18/2010 13:14 Run Time (min): 

## 18.50

Administrator



### 4.0



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name 

## Height Area min 

## 118 1-lS*min 

### 1 4.25 Flouride 

### 0.085 0.0165 2 6.05 Chloride 

### 0.118 0.0221 3 13.48 Phosphate 

### 0.008 0.0025 

### 4 16.91 Sulfate 

### 0.021 0.0088 Total: 

### 0.232 0 050

S ulfateArea/1 ntegration 

## Injection Volume: 

## 35.0 Channel: 

## ECD_1 Wavelength: 

## n.a. Bandwidth: 

## n.a. Dilution Factor: 

## 1.0000 Sample Weight: 

## 1.0000 Sample Amount: 

## 1.0000

EGO 1



### Chromeleon (c) Dionex 

### 1996-2001 Version 

### 6.60 Build 

### 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-1 0 Page 5-10 3/19/2010 9:25AM


# 86 0.1 ppm 

# F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.· DL

Client 

## Valero Hartley Vial Number: 

## 1 Sample Type: 

## standard Control Program: 

## Anions 1000 Ouantif. Method: 

## ICS_1000_Anions Recording Time: 

## 3/18/201013:34 Run Time (min): 

## 18.50

Administrator



### 4.00

3.00 

# l

# 200~ 1

# 1.00~

-6.047



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height Area min l-IS 1-!S*min 1 4.24 Flouride 0.086 0.0163 2 6.05 Chloride 0.129 0.0245 3 13.44 Phosphate 0.007 0.0021 4 16 92 Sulfate 0.025 0.0118 Total: 0.246 0.055

SullateArea/lntegration 

### Injection Volume: 

## 35.0 Channel: 

## ECD_1 Wavelength: 

## n.a. Bandwidth: 

## n.a. Dilution Factor: 

## 1.0000 Sample Weight: 

## 1.0000 Sample Amount: 

## 1.0000

ECD 1

Chromeleon (c) Oionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-75

# C-76 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 6-10 3/19/2010 9:25AM


# 87 0.1 ppm 

# F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.- DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min):

4.00

# 30~ 1**2.00-~** J

# 1.00~ 

# l Valero Hartley 1 standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 13:53 18.50

1

- Flouri<M:**~~Jwide** - 6.050

,,-......_**I~\ ~~···,**  

## Injection Volume: 35.0 Channel: ECD_1 Wavelength: n.a. Bandwidth: n.a. Dilution Factor: 1.0000 Sample Weight: 1.0000 Sample Amount: 1.0000

ECD 1

, 3

1 - Phosphate

.**13.~4** 1 Sulfate 

# ·j

I

. 1 

### 1 

### min 

# -o**.so_l:~-,-.,--,-.---,-,-'+--,--,--,---,1--,-~c---;-~ -.---.-~-,-,**  

### -.-----,----,.--,---.---.--,--,**-.-.--,---,---,-----'~** 

### '


### 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 19.0



## No. 

## Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.25 Flouride 2 6.05 Chlonde 3 13.48 Phosphate 4 16.92 Sulfate 

## Total:

S ulf ateAreail ntegration 

## Height 

# us 0.087 0.138 0.003 0.023 0.251 

## Area 

# uS* min

0.0180 0.0261 0 0009 0.0104

0.055

Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 7-10 3/19/2010 9:25AM


# 88 0.1 ppm F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.
- DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min):

4.00

'

# 3.00~ J 

# 1 1 2.00--i



### 1

# 00~ Valero Hartley 1 standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 14:13 18.50 Injection Volume: 

## 35.0 Channel: 

## ECD_1 Wavelength: 

## n.a. Bandwidth: 

## n.a. Dilution Factor: 

## 1.0000 Sample Weight: 

## 1.0000 Sample Amount: 

## 1.0000

··-- ·---·--·-··-- ..**··--~--··--··** 

### ECD 1

## ~F-Io_u_ri~"-'--c=_&_2!ttf_id_e_- _ 6

· 0

_4

_ 7

______ ---------'.

## _3~ Phosphate- 

### 13.440- Sulfate

## No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 1 4.24 Flouride 2 6.05 Chloride 3 13.44 Phosphate 

### 4 16.92 Sulfate 

## Total:

Su l!ateArea/1 ntegrati on 

## Height 

## !lS 0.087 0.138 0.004 0.024 0.252 

## Area IJS*min

0.0179 0.0261 0.0010 0.0104

0.055

Chromeleon (cl Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-77

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 8-10 3/19/2010 9:25 AM


# 89 0.1 ppm 

# F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.- DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quanti!. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min):

4.00

3.00



# 1 2.00-j 

## J

l

# 1.00~

No.

1 2 3 

## 4 Total: Ret. Time min 4.25 6.05 13.47 16.91 Valero Hartley 1 

### standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3118/2010 14:32 18.50

Administrator

1 - Flouridi- 4:.1t!W"ide

- 6.050**·~~~------------ .~,**  ;



### Peak Name Height 

# us Flouride 0.086 Chloride 0.087 Phosphate 0.006 Sulfate 0.023 0.201

SulfateArea/lntegration Area 

# uS* min

0.0169 0.0157 0.0019 0.0104

0.045 

## Injection Volume: 35.0 

## Channel: ECD_1 

## Wavelength: n.a. 

## Bandwidth: n.a. 

## Dilution Factor: 1.0000 

## Sample Weight: 1.0000 

## Sample Amount: 1.0000

ECD 1

. 3

- Phosphate • 13.467' Sulfate •



### 12.5 15.0



### Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 000 _Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 9-10 3/19/201 0 9:25 AM


# 90 0.1 ppm 

# F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.- DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min):



# 4001**300~** I 

# ] J 

# I 2.00-,



## No.

1 

### 2 3 4 

## Total: Ret. Time min 4.25 6.05 13.49 16.88 

## Valero Hartley 1 standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 14:57 18.50

Administrator

Peak Name Height 

# us Flouride 0.084 

## Chloride 0.116 

## Phosphate 0.007 

## Sulfate 0.022 0.229



## SulfateAreailntegration Area 

# uS* min

0.0166 0.0218 0.0028 0.0102

0.051 

## Injection Volume: 

## 35.0 Channel: 

## ECD_1 Wavelength: 

## n.a. Bandwidth: 

## n.a. Dilution Factor: 

## 1.0000 Sample Weight: 

## 1.0000 Sample Amount: 

## 1.0000

EGO 1

12.5



## Chromeleon (C) 

## Oionex 1996-2001 

## Version 6.60 

## Build 1428 

# C-79

# C-80 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 10-10 

## 3/19/2010 9:25 AM


# 91 0.1 ppm 

# F, Cl, 

# P04 and 

# S04 std.- DL

Client 

## Valero Hartley Vial Number: 

## 1 Sample Type: 

## standard Control Program: 

## Anions 1000 Ouantif. Method: 

## ICS_1000_Anions Recording Time: 

## 3/18/2010 15:16 Run Time (min): 

## 18.50

S.OO

### ~~IONS 03-10 #91



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height Area min 

# us uS*min 1 4.24 Flouride 0.085 0.0173 2 6 05 Chloride 0.134 0.0256 3 13.55 Phosphate 0.013 0.0055 

## Total: 0.232 0.048

SulfateArea 1 

### 1ntegration 

## Injection Volume: 

## 35.0 Channel: 

## ECD_1 Wavelength: 

## n.a. Bandwidth: 

## n.a. Dilution Factor: 

## 1.0000 Sample Weight: 

## 1.0000 Sample Amount: 

## 1.0000

ECD 1



### Chromeleon (c) Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 1-8 3/19/2010 

## 8:59 AM


# 92 1.0 ppm 

# P04 std. • DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): · Valero Hartley 

## 1 standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 15:36 18.50

Administrator



### 4.00

3.00


## J 

# j I 2.00!

l



## No.

1 

## Total: Ret. Time Peak Name min 13.43 Phosphate

SulfateArea/lntegration 

## Height 11S 0.079 0.079 

## Area llS*min 0.035 0.035 

## Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 35.0 ECD_1
n.a. n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

----. ··- 

### ---·-

. 

## ----------------· ECD 1

Chromeleon IC) 

### Oionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-81

# C-82 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 2-8 

## 3/19/2010 8:59AM


# 93 2.0 ppm 

# P04 std.
- DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Valero Hartley 

## 1 standard 

## Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 15:56 18.50 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a. n.a. 

## 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

----·------·--·· ·-------·-····---· 

## -----··--------------·-· -------- 

## S.OOfiONS 00-10 #93

4.00 i


# 1
3.00J 

# i

2.00J '

1

# 00~

No. Ret. Time min Peak Name

1 

### 13.44 

### Phosphate 

## Total:

SullateArea/lntegration 2.0 ppm 

## P04 std.

- DL



## Height Area llS llS*min 0.167 0.074 0.167 0.074 ECD 1

t'no,spnlate

- 

### 13.437



### Cilromeleon (c) 01onex 1996-2001 

### Version 6.60 

### Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 

## Page 3-8 3/19/201 0 8:59 AM


# 94 5.0 ppm 

# P04 std.
- DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Valero Hartley 

## 1 standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/1812010 16:15 18.50

S.OO

### ~~IONS 03-10 #94



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name min 

## 1 13.44 Phosphate 

## Total:

SulfateArea 1 

### 1ntegration m 

## P04 std.

- DL



### 7.5


## Height Area llS llS*min 0.405 0.178 0.405 0.178 

## Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1


## n.a. n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

Phosphate- 13.444



### Chromeleon Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-83

# C-84 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 

## 4-8 3/19/2010 

## 8:59 AM


# 95 0.5 ppm 

# F, Cl and 

# S04 std.- DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Quantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min):

## 2.00~

I 

### 1.00-i
I



## No. Ret. Time min 1 4.24 2 6.05 3 16.90 

## Total: Valero Hartley 1 

## standard 

## Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 16:35 18.50

. 1 •

### Ftourid~ :

### ~~fb'\-ide • 6.047 i\**~**



## Peak Name Height
us Flouride 0.425 Chloride 0.343 Sulfate 0.102 0.871

SullateArea/lntegration 

## Area uS*min 0.088 0.068 0.049 0.204 

## Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 

## 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1



### Chromeleon Dionex 1996 · 2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 5-8 

## 3/19/201 0 8:59 AM


# 96 1.0 ppm 

# F, Cl and 

# S04 std. · DL

Client Vial Number: Sample Type: Control Program: Ouantif. Method: Recording Time: Run Time (min): 

## Valero Hartley 

## 1 standard Anions 1000 ICS_1000_Anions 3/18/2010 16:54 18.50 Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 

## 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000



## -----------------------------·--------------- --------------------------,

4.00



# l

1.00--1 

## I 

# J

No.



## 1 2 

## 3 Total: Ret. Time min 4.24 6.05 16.90 1

- Flouride • 4.240 2- Chloride 6.047



### Peak Name Height 

## !lS Flouride 0.875 Chloride 0.724 Sulfate 0.194 1.793

SulfateArea;lntegration Area 1-!S

.. min 0.181 0.147 0.094 0.422 EGO 1

·Sulfate

### Chrome!eon (c) Oionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428 

# C-85

# C-86 Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 

## Page 6-8 3/19/2010 8:59AM


# 97 2.0 

# ppm F, Cl and 

# 504 std.- DL

Client Valero Hartley 

## Vial Number: 1 

## Sample Type: standard 

## Control Program: Anions 1000 

## Quantif. Method: ICS_1000_Anions 

## Recording Time: 3/1812010 17:14 

## Run Time (min): 18.50

Administrator

# 3.00~**~** i 2.QQ--j 1 • Flouride- 4.247



### 2

- Chloride

- 

### 6.057



### 0.0 2.5 5.0



### No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height min 

## l-IS 1 4.25 Flouride 1.814 2 6.06 Chloride 1.282 3 16.90 Sulfate 0.386 Total: 3.481

SullateAreailntegration Area !lS*min 0.374 0.261 0.187 0.822 

## Injection Volume: Channel: Wavelength: Bandwidth: Dilution Factor: Sample Weight: Sample Amount: 35.0 ECD_1
n.a.
n.a. 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

ECD 1

3 ·Sulfate· ·'\



### \



### Chromeleon (c) 

### Dionex 1996-2001 Version 6.60 Build 1428

## Operator:Administrator Timebase:ICS_1 OOO_Anions Sequence:ANIONS 03-10 Page 7-8 3/19/2010 8:59AM


# 98 5.0 ppm F, Cl and 

# 504 std.
- DL

Client 

## Valero Hartley Vial Number: 

## 1 Sample Type: 

## standard Control Program: 

## Anions 1000 Ouantif. Method: 

## ICS_1000_Anions Recording Time: 

## 3/1812010 17:34 Run Time (min): 

## 18.50

4.00 

# 301 II 2 Chloride

- 6.050

# ~ II .I II l 

# i it 

## l 

# !I 2.00-1

## 1.00~

5.0 7.5



## No. Ret. Time Peak Name Height min 

# us 1 4.24 Flouride 

### 4.824 2 6.05 Chloride 

### 3.229 3 16.90 Sulfate 

### 0.979 

## Total: 9.032

SulfateArea/lntegration 

## Area 11S*min 0.958 0.658 0.475 2.091 

## Injection Volume: 

## 35.0 Channel: 

## ECD_1 Wavelength: 

## n.a. Bandwidth: 

## n.a. Dilution Factor: 

## 1.0000 Sample Weight: 

## 1.0000 Sample Amount: 

## 1.0000

ECD 1

19.0



### Chromeleon (C) 

### D1onex 

### 1996-2001 Version 

### 6.60 Build 

### 1428 

# C-87

# Daniel E. Fitzgerald

From: Sent: To: Subject: Ron Mcleod [Ron.McLeod@ALSGiobal.com} Friday, October22, 2010 12:10 PM dfitzgerald@arienv.com Detection Limit Definitions for ALS data reports

For HRMS analyses of PCDD/F, PCB and PAH, we report to an EDL or EQL (Estimated Detection Limit or Estimated Quantitation Limit) as defined in SW846 Method 8290A In this approach, we report done to 2.5:1 signal to noise.

For VOC (0031/8260B) and for M29 Metals, we report to a Reporting Limit (RL) which is a value set at 2-4 times the MDL as defined by 40CFR Pt 136 Appendix B. By some definitions, these RL being 6 to 12 times the sigma value (see 40CFR Pt 136 Appendix B) are at or above the Practical Quantitation Limit (POL).
Regards

Ron

How was your customer experience? Please click here to send us your feedback
Regards


# Ron Mcleod GENERAL MANAGER

ALS Environmental

Address 5420 Mainway Drive, Unit #5 Burlington ON L?L 6A4

PHONE+1 905 3313111 

### FAX+ 1 905 331 4567


### www.alsglobal.com

.!, Please consider the environment before printing this email.



# ***************************************************************************** The information contained in this email is confidential. If the reader is not the intended recipient then you must notify the sender immediately by return email and then delete all copies of this email. You must not copy, distribute, print or otherwise use the information. Email may be stored by the Company to support operational activities. All information will be held in accordance with the Company's Privacy Policy which can be found on the Company's website- W\V\v.campbell.com.au. 

# *****************************************************************************

C-88 1

# ---- 

# - 

# - 

# - - ._. 

# ___ _

----- -;:::;;-- !!¥ - _ ..... - 

# -----

.... 

# --
._._

.... ENVIRONMENTAL""""' INC, 

# APPENDIXD

899-02 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3

- 8/6/10 

# Process Data

## 3-Aug-10 Runs #1 & 2 

## 07:28 -17:22

Kiln car# 

## 4 pushed@ 

## 07:28 Kiln car# 

## 109 pushed @ 

## 17:22 CLAY MACT ICR TESTING
KOHLER WI Tunnel Kiln 19 Throughput Data

Metals 

## & D/F

Total pushed = 

## 7498 kg, which = 

## 16533 lbs 

# I Rate= 

## 1653 lbs/hr 

# I Rate= 

## 749.9 kg/hr 

## 4-Aug-10 Run #3 (D/F 

## & Metals) and Runs 1,2, 

## & 3 (HF 

## & HCI) 

## 07:15-16:00 [Note: D/F 

## & Metals test run 3 from 07:20 -11:35; HF/HC/ runs 1-3 from 12:30 -16:05]

Kiln car# 

## 53 pushed @ 

## 07:15 Kiln car# 

## 104 pushed @ 

## 15:58

Total pushed = 

## 6947 kg, which = 

# I Rate= 

# I Rate= 

## 15318 lbs


## 1751 lbs/hr


## 794.1 kg/hr



# D-1

### 4-Aug-10 CLAY MACT ICR TESTING
KOHLER WI Tunnel Kiln 19 Throughput Data

Run #3 (D/F & 

### Metals) and Runs 1,2, & 

### 3 (HF & 

### HCI) 07:15- 16:00 [Note: D/F 

### & Metals test run 3 from 07:20 -11:35; HF/HCI runs 1-3 from 12:30 -16:05]



### Kiln car# 53 pushed @ 

### 07:15 Kiln car# 104 pushed @ 

### 15:58
Total pushed = 

### 6947 kg_ which



# D-2 Rate=
Rate= 15318 lbs

1751 lbs/hr
794.1 kg/hr

## Q24 5-Aug-10 Runs#1,2 

## & 3

Tote Weight Tote Weight 

## 3018 lbs@ 2490 lbs@ 06:50 11:55 CLAY MACT ICR TESTING
KOHLER WI Robot Spray Booth Q24



## PM

Glaze Used 528 lbs over 5 hrs, 5 mins, minus 35 minute break= 4 hrs, 30 minutes

# ~==========-----. Spray Rate 117 lbs/hr
Spray Rate= 53.2 kg/hr

!Glaze is 72% solids, so: 84.5 lbs/hr solids spray rate

!Glaze is 72% solids, so: 38.3 kg/hr solids spray rate



# D-3

### 5-Aug-10 Runs #1 & 

### 2: 07:00

- 16:30



### North Tunnel Drver CLAY MACT ICR TESTING
KOHLER WI Tunnel Dryer Greenware Loading Data

D/F

Dryer has only one stack, which was sampled

Total Weight Pushed into Dryer: 19,425 lbs greenware !Average Throughput: 2045 lbs greenware/hr !Average Throughput: 927.5 kg greenware/hr



### 6-Aug-10 D/F

Run 3: 07:00 12:00



### North Tunnel Drver

Total Weight Pushed into Dryer: 14,204 lbs greenware !Average Throughput: 2841 lbs greenware/hr !Average Throughput: 1289 kg greenware/hr



# 0-4

### ,_, 

# ___ _

-----
APPEND IKE

899-02 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3

- 8/6/10 

# Calibration Datam

I ..... APEX INSTRUMENTS METHOD 5 PRE-TEST CONSOLE CALIBRATION

USING CALIBRATED CRITICAl. ORIFICES
5-POINT ENGLISH UNITS

Meter Console Information Calibration Conditions

ConiiOie Model Number MC522 Date I

rime 7-Feb-10 5:00

Console Serial Number 503001 Barometric Pressure 29.4 In Hg

DGM Model Number MS4 Theoretical Critical Vacuum 1 13.9 inHg

DGM Serial Number DGM 1505857 Callbrallon Technician B. Crane

1 For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 21n. Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above.

**~-·-** -··---· **-~·..---** ---···- ....... , .. '

... • -- **-··~-•** -- no -•• ,,.,.., -••n-. '"' .. ............. Calibration

Date

Run

Time Metering Console

DGMOrlllce

Volume Volume Outlet Temp OuUetTemp Serial Coefficient

Elapsed

.AH Initial Final Initial Final Number

(0)

(P..,) cv

.. 1 (Vmrl

**(1m~** tim• I K'

min

lnH,O CUbic feet cubic feet •F •F seeabove2

13.0 3.4 779.000 792.260 73 74 OX73 0.7634

12.0 2.0 857.700 666.950 77 77 OX63 0.5863

12.0 1.2 799.000 806.080 75 76 OX 55 0.4484

13.0 0.7 818.800 824.760 77 77 OX48 0.3485

18.0 0.3 809.300 814.800 76 77 Q)(40

**0.2~16**

Results

Standardized Data Orv Gae Meter

Calibration

Factor Flowrate .IIH«<!

Drv

Gas Meter Critical Orillce Value Variation Std& Corr 0.76SCFM

(V....,)

(Omr""') (Vcr,""') (Qat...,) (Y) (AY) (Omroldlr..,) (.IIH@)

cubic

feet crm CUbic feet elm elm In H20

13.018 1.001 12.934 0.995 0.994 -0.001 0.995 1.914

8.991 0.749 8.956 0.746 0.996 0.001 0.746 1.974

6.887 0.574 6.843 0.570 0.994 -0.001 0.570 2.027

5.775 0.444 5.759 0.443 0.997 0.002 0.443 2.005

5.329 0.296 5.294 0.294 0.994 ·0.001 0.294 2.082 Critical Orifice AmbTemp Initial (t..,.) OF 78 75 75 77 77 Variation (MH@) -0.086 -0.026 0.026 0.004 0.082

0.995 Y Average 2.000 .IIH@Average

rdance with USEPA Methods, CFR Title 40, Pert 60, Appendix A-3. Method 5, 16.2.3 Date **.z~** Factora/Converslons

Sid Temp 528 "R

Sid Press 29.92 in Ha

K. 17.647 oRiinHg

AmbTemp Actual

Final

Vacuum

(t...•l "F inHg

76 15

74 15

76 19 '

75 20 '

77 -· ' ?2 I
-/0m

I 1'\l APEX INSTRUMENTS METHOD 5 POST- TEST CONSOLE CALIBRATION

USING CALIBRATED CRITICAL ORIFICES
3-POINT ENGLISH UNITS

Meter Console lnfonnatlon Calibration Conditions

Console Model Number MC522 Date I

Time 3-Sep-10 10:00 ' •

Console Serial Number 503001 Barometric Pressure 29.1 In Hg

DGM Model Number MS-4 Theoretical Critical Vacuum 1 13.7 in Hg I

OGM Serial Number DGM 1505857 Calibration Technician B. Crane !

1

For valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2 ln. Hg greater than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above

.

• ··- **-··~·--·** -· **~---- ---···-·-··~·**  .,. l ···--· -- -··--· -- ••• -·· ··-·· -· •• .,._. • • .. . ...... ....... Calibration

Data

Run

Time Meterln!l Console Critical Orifice

DGMOrlflce

Volume Volume Outlet Temp Outlet Temp Serial Coelllclent AmbTemp

Elapsed

AH Initial Final Initial Final Number Initial

(El)

(Pm)

**(Vm~)** (Vmf) (lmr) (tmr) K' (l.mb)

min

inH:P cubic feet cubic feet OF OF seeabove2 'F

10.0 2.0 442.200 449.960 75 75 OX 56 0.5863 77

13.0 2.0 449.950 460.080 75 76 oxsa 0.5863 75

12.0 2.0 460.080 469.440 76 76 OX 58 0.5863 76

Results

Standardized Data Dry Gas Meter

Calibration

Factor Flowrate AH!li!

Dry

Gas Meter Critical Orifice Value Variation Std & Corr 0.76SCFM Variation

(Vm...,)

(Om.w) (Vcc,ld) (Ooo.,.,) (Y) (AY) (OmsldUoorr) (AH@) (MH@)

cubic

feet cfm cubic feel cfm cfm in H20

7.489 0.749 7.372 0.737 0.984 0.002 0.737 2.009 0.002

9.757 0.751 9.588 0.738 0.983 0.000 0.738 2.006 -o.001

9.016 0.751 8.846 0.737 0.981 -0.002 0.737 2.006 -0.001

Pretest Gamma 0.995 %Deviation __ 12

__ 0.983 -·- c__________'UI,verage 2.007

__ __ffi@Averajj!l_ Factors/Conversions

StdTemp 528 'R

Std Press 29.92 in Hg

K, 17.647 oR/in Hg

AmbTemp Actual

Final

Vacuum

(l.mo) 'F inHg

75 17

76 17

76 17

(Noie:FOrealibretion FactorY, the ratio of lhe

**rn~ilie ~bration**  meter to the dry gas meter, acceptable toiei!mce of Individual values from theavera\Je-is+-o.02. )

atcordance with USEPA Methods, CFR Title 40. Part 60, Appendix A-3, Method 5, 16.2.3 Date Cf·3'·1o

Master Meter Cal Workbookm

I w lilelor Consolo tnformlllion

Console Mode1 Number MC522

ConsoJe Serial Number 604178

Number MS4

Numbor IDGM 973218 APEX INSTRUMENTS METHOD 5 PRE· TEST CONSOLE CALIBRATION

USING CALIBRATED CRITICAL ORIFICES
5·POINT ENGLISH UNITS Calibration Conditions

Date lrtme 14-Jan-10 7:00

Barometric P.rassure 29.3 in Hg

Theoretical Critical Vacuum 1 13.8 lnHg

**callbroll!!~** Toohniclan

**~** B. Cra!)e

'For

valid test results, the Actual Vacuum should be 1 to 2ln. Hg greater then the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above •

···- -····--· _. .... ---•••-•-••• ,,. ,,,_ .. .., -- -•••-•-- •n -• ••-•• -•••- •• .. ......... ... ., .. canl>ralioo

Dala

RunTime

liletenngConsole

DGMOrillce

Volume VCiumo OuUetTemp Outlot Temp Soria! Coefficient

Elapaed

AH Initial Final Initial Final Number

(Ell

(P.,.) **(II~** (11,.) (1.;) (!,.,) K'

min

lnH,.O cubic fuel cubic fuel 'F 'F see above2

17.0 0.2 759.300 764.440 66 65 OX40 0.2316

11.0 0.6 766.700 771.700 65 65 OX48 0.3485

12.0 1.0 777.600 784.860 65 65 OX!i5 0.4484

10.0 1.7 793.600 801.330 65 65 OX63 0.5863

10.0 3.1 602.400 812.730 65 65 OX73 0.7834

Result$

Starnlardlred Data DryGasliletor

Calibration

Factor flow rate AH@

Dry

Gao Meter Critical Orifice Value Variation S!d&Corr 0.75SCFM

(II .... ..! co,.,..,, (1/cr...,) (0,"'"",) (Y) (AY) (Q,_,) (tiH@)

cubic

feet cfm cubic feet elm cfm In H20

5.054 0.297 5.028 0.200 0.995 0.009 0.296 1.520

4.925 0.448 4.893 0.445 0.994 0.007 0.445 1.571

6.960 0.560 6.006 0.572 0.987 0.000 0.572 1.630

7.635 0.764 7.484 0.748 0.980 -0.006 0.748 1.695

10.239 1.02.4 9.999 1.000 0.977 -0.010 1.000 1.743

0.966 YAvorage

**~632**

rditlce with USEPA Methods, CFR Tille 40, Part 60, AppendiX A-3, Melllod 5, 16.2.3 Critical Orifice AmbTemp Initial (l,.o) 'F 65 66 65 66 66 Varlalion (MH@) -0.112 -0.061 ·0.002 0.063 0.111 **<!H@Av~_rago_**

Dale /· Factors/Con..,rslom

Sid Temp 528 'R

S!ciPress 29.92 In !ill

K, 1j'.647 1 **oRffn~**

AmbTemp Actual

Final

Vacuum

(!...,.) 'F in Hg

65 22

65 21

66 20

65 18

65 15

• /Z':>mJ,..APEXINSTRUMENTSMETHOD6POST-TESTCONSOLECALIBRATIONUSINGCALIBRATEOCRITICALORIFICES3-POINTENGLISHUNITSMeterConsoleInformationCalibrationConditionsConsoleModelNumberMC522DateITime18-Aug-101:00ConsoleSerialNumber604178BarometricPressure29.4inHgiDGMModelNumberMS-4TheoreticalCriticalVacuum113.9InHgDGMSerialNumberDGM973218CalibrationTechnicianB.Crane1Forvalidtestresults,theActualVacuumshouldbe1to2in.HggreaterthantheTheoreticalCriticalVacuumshownabove•..._-----.·-·····--·-·--···-·-.•,··•···----·--···-·--•••...,.•.-.•-···--•v-....CalibrationDataRunTimeMeterinaConsoleCriticalOrificeDGMOrificeVolumeVolumeOutletTempOutletTempSerialCoefficientAmbTempElaosedAHInitialFinalInitialFinalNumberInitial(®)(Pml(V.,;)(V.,.)(lmr)K'(l,mb)mininH20cubicfeetcubicfeet'F'Fseeabove2'F10.01.7131.000138.7807576OX630.58637510.01.7138.780146.5907677OX630.58637610.01.7146.590154.4107778OX630.586377ResultsStandardizedDataDryGasMeterCalibrationFactorFlowrateAH®DryGasMeterCriticalOrificeValueVariationSid&Carr0.75SCFMVariation(V""',.)(0,.,,.,)(Vcr""")(Q,.,,..)M(t.Y)(0,.,...,,,,,)(t.H@)(AAH@)cubicfeetelmcubfcfeetcfmelminH207.5600.7567.4390.7440.9840.0020.7441.6880.0017.5750.7577.4320.7430.981..0.0010.7431.6880.0017.5700.7577.4280.7430.981-0.0010.7431.686-0.001PretestGamma0.98611/oDeviation0.40.982YAverag!!__1.687AH@AverageFactors/ConversionsStdTemp528'RStdPress29.92inHg..17.647-·oRiinHgAmbTempActualFinalVacuum(!,.,)'FinHg76187718'7718[Noie:ForCa!iiifaiiOilfaCiO<Y,theratioofthereadingofthemetertothedrygasmeter,acceptabletoleranceofindividualvaluesfrnmtheaverageis+-0.02.IoltlancewithUSEPAMethods,CFRTitle40,Part60,AppendixA-3,Method5,16.2.3DateMasterMeterCalWorkbookm

I 01 APEX INSTRUMENTS METHOD 5 PRE-TEST CONSOLE CALIBRATION

USING CALIBRATED CRITICAL ORIFICES
S·POINT ENGLISH UNITS

Meter Console Jnfonmttlon calibration Condition&

Console Model Number MC522 Date I

Time 29-Jan-10 11:00

Console Serial Number 901001 Baromatrlc Pressure 29.8 itlHg

OGM Model Number MS4 Theoretical CritiCal Vacuum 1 14.0 lnHa

OGM Serial Number OGM317423 Calibration Technician B. Crane

'For valid test resultS, the Actual vacuum should be 1 to 2 ln. Hg greeter than the Theoretical Critical Vacuum shown above.

'T **~nv** WlUI'-Iill Vnlt"'V YVIifiiiVIVUIJ 0 t IU ... PI ..... VII .. VI'VW Ul -.1\fllillllfl !WliiWitj Ill A JI\UhOtJ ... IIII Callbrallon

Data

RunTime

Meterlna Console

OGMOrlflce

Volume Volume Outlet Temp OulleiTemp Serial Coefficient

Elaosed

4H Initial Final lnHial Final N11t11ber

(9)

(PmJ (V.,.) (V,r) (!,) !t..rl K'

min

lnH,O cubleleet eubrefeet oF "F seeabova2

10.0 3.2 640.000 550.170 74 75 OX73 0.7834

13.0 1.8 593.400 603.43.0 77 78 OXB3 0.5883

10.0 1.0 551.300 557.170 75 75 OX55 0.4484

18.0 0.8 589.800 578.000 75 75 OX4B 0.3485

21.0 0.3 557.900 564.310 76 76 OX40 0.2316

Results

Standardized Data OryGaaMeter

Calibration

Factor Flowrate 4H@

DtV

Gas Meter Ctltlcel Orifice Valua VarlaUon Std&Corr 0.76SCFM

cv .. ...J (Omt""") (Vcr,..,.) (0..,...,} (Y) (A.Y) (Q.,,......,) (4H@)

cubic

feet elm cubiolllet din din ln H20

10.072 1.007 10.096 1.010 1.003 0.004 1.010 1.763

9.644 0.757 9.797 0.754 0.995 ..0.004 0.754 1.759

5.776 0.578 5.775 0.577 1.000 0.001 0.577 1.665

8.061 0.446 8.075 0.449 1.002 0.003 0.449 1.652

6.285 0.299 6.261 0.296 0.996 ·0.003 0.298 1.616

0.999 YAverage 1.691 Factors/Conversions

Ski Temp 529 •R

Sid Preas 29.92 inHa

K, 17.647 oR/inHg

Crllfcel 01111ee AmbTemp

AmbTemp Actual

lniUal

Final Vacuum

o-J

o-J

"F

"F inHg

73 73 15

76 76 17

74 74 19

74 75 20

74 75 22 i

Variation (MH@) 0.072 0.088 ..0.029 ..0.039 ·0.075 A.H@ Average

INciiO:ForC'iiiibrallon Factor v, lhe

**ra~o** of thereiiirllig oflhe calibration merer to !he d'Y gas meter, aeesplable lolerance of individual values from the average 1s +..0.02. I

•rdance with USEPA Methods, CFR Title 40, Part 60, AP/.leridix A::S, Method 5, 16.2.3 Date /•mImAPEXINSTRUMENTSMETHOD6POST·TESTCONSOLECALIBRATIONUSINGCALIBRATEDCRITICALORIFICES3-POINTENGLISHUNITSMeterConsoleInformationCalibrationConditionsConsoleModelNumberMC522DateIrime21J..Aljg-1011:30ConsoleSerialNumber901001BarometricPressure:29.2inHgDGMModelNumberMS-4TheoreticalCriticalVacuum"13.8inHgDGMSerialNumberDGM317423CalibrationTechnicianB.Crane1Forvalidtestresuhs,theActualVacuumshouldbe1to2ln.HggreaterthantheTheoreticalCriticalVacuumshownabove.···-·-····--·-····--___,...........,,,...--.,..,•..,.,--•••-••,,_.,._,,_._,\u.......'a'......CalibrationDataRunTimeMeteringConsoleCriticalOrificeDGMOrilicaVolumeVolumeOutletTempOutie!TempSerialCoefficientAmbTempElapsedaHInitialFinalInitialFinalNumberInitial(6)(Pml(Vm)(V.,)K'(t,.,..)mininH20cubiclee!cubicfeet•F'Fseeabove2OF10.01.8154.300161.9707879OX630.58637910.01.8161.970169.6407981OX630.58638010.01.8169.640177.3108182OX630.586381ResultsStandardizedDataDryGasMeterCalibrationFactorFlowrateII.H@DryGasMeterCriticalOrifjceValueVariationSid&Carr0.75SCFMVariation(Vmt•tdl)(Q""'"")(Vcr,...,)(0..<ofdl)(Y)(<IY)(Q.=·)(<IH@)(MH@)cubiclee!ctmcubicfeetcfmelminH207.3660.7377.3660.7371.000-0.0020.7371.8020.0017.3470.7357.3590.7361.0020.0000.7361.801-0.0017.3270.7337.3490.7351.0030.0020.7351.801-0.001PretestGamma__QJJ!J9-L....O(o_!)evlation____Q.2---1.001YA\ferage1.801t.H@AverageFadors/Conversion5StdTemp528'RSidPress29.92lnHgK,17.647oR/inHgAmbTempActualFinalVacuum(!,.,..)'FinHg801781178317(NO!e:ForCalibiiiiioOfaciorY,theratioofthereadingofthecalibrationmeterto!hedrygasmeter,acceptabletoleranceofindividualvaluesfromtheaverageis+-0.02.IccorllancewithUSEPAMethods,CFRTille40,Part60,AppendixA-3,-Meinod5,16.2.3Datecg'·ZD·/DMasterMeterCalWorkbook

## ARI Environmental 1 

## Inc. Gas Meter Thermometer Calibration Data Form Pre -Test
Meter Box: Calibrator: Date: 503001 

## B. Crane 2/712010 

## Barometric: 29.43 

## Ambient Temp: 74 

## Reference Thermometer: Altek Thermocouple Source
Reference Thermometer Difference Thermometer Temperature Temperature (%)mean Temperature Altek Inlet Inlet Oulet

0 

## NA 0 100 99 200 201 300 302 400 398 500 499



## Temperature Temperature (o/o) 

## mean Temperature Altek Filter Filter Exit

0 0 0.00 0 100 99 -0.18 99 200 201 0.15 201 300 302 0.26 3021 400 398 -0.23 398 500 499 -0.10 499



## Reference Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature (%)mean Altek Stack stack

0 0 0.00 200 201 0.15 400 398 -0.23 600 601 0.09 800 803 0.24 1000 1003 0.21 

# - - 

# - 

# - - 

# - 

# = nvc.



## Difference Thermometer Difference (%)mean Temperature (%)mean

Oulet Probe Probe 0.00 0 0.00 -0.18 99 -0.18 0.15 201 0.15 0.26 302 0.26 -0.23 398 -0.23 -0.10 499 -0.10



## (%)mean Temperature (%)mean Exit Aux Aux 0.00 0 0.00 -0.18 99 -0.18 0.15 202 0.30 358.03 302 0.26 -0.23 398 -0.23 -0.10 499 -0.10



## Reference Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature (%)mean Altek Stack Stack 1200 1202 0.12 1400 1400 0.00 1600 1603 0.15 1800 1801 0.04



## Revised 1**@!~**

## ARI Environmental, Inc. Gas Meter Thermometer Calibration Data Form Post-Test
Meter Box: 503001 

## Calibrator: R Crane 

## Date: 9/3/2010 

## Barometric: 29.11 

## Ambient Temp: 75 

## Reference Thermometer: Altek Thermocouple Source

Reference Thermometer Difference Thermometer Temperature Temperature (%)mean Temperature Altek Inlet Inlet Oulet

0 NA 0 100 99 200 201 300 301 400 398 500 499

Reference Thermometer Difference Thermometer Temperature Temperature (%)mean Temperature Altek Filter Filter Exit

0 0 0.00 0 100 99 -0.18 99 200 201 0.15 2201 300 301 0.13 301 400 398 -0.23 398 500 499 -0.10 499

Reference Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature (%)mean Altek Stack Stack

0 0 0.00 200 201 0.15 400 398 -0.23 600 601 0.09 800 803 0.24 1000 1003 0.21



# E-8 Difference

( 0



## /o} mean

Oulet 0.00 -0.18 0.15 0.13 -0.23 -0.10

Difference (%)mean Exit 0.00 -0.18 303.18

0.13 -0.23 -0.10

Reference 

# - 

# - __...- 

# .-.-

....._.. .._.. .._.. ....-. 

# -



# --- _.._... 

# -



# -- 

# -

..._.__**ENVIRONMENTAL~** INC.



## Thermometer Difference Temperature (%)mean Probe Probe

0 0.00 99 -0.18 201 0.15 301 0.13 398 -0.23 499 -0.10

Thermometer Difference Temperature (%)mean Aux Aux

0 0.00 99 -0.18 201 0.15 301 0.13 398 -0.23 499 -0.10

Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature (%)mean Altek Stack Stack 1200 1201 0.06 1400 1400 0.00 1600 1602 0.10 1800 1800 0.00

Revised 1 0/03

## ARI Environmental, Inc. Gas Meter Thermometer Calibration Data Form**Pre~** 

## Test Calibration

Meter Box: Calibrator: Date: Barometric: Ambient Temp: 604178 B. Crane 1/14/2010

29.26

65 

## Reference Thermometer: Altek Thermocouple Source

Ref.

## Thermometer~ Diff. Thermometer 

# I Diff. Temp. Temp. (%}mean Temp. (%)mean Altek Inlet Inlet Oulet Oulet

0 4 0.87 4 0.87 100 101 0.18 101 0.18 200 204 0.61 204 0.61 300 303 0.39 303 0.39 400 400 0.00 400 0.00 500 500 0.00 500 0.00

Reference Thermometer' Diff.

## Thermometer~ Diff.

Temp. Temp. (%) mean Temp. (%) mean Altek Filter Filter Exit 

## Exit

0 5 1.09 5 1.09 100 102 0.36 102 0.36 200 205 0.76 205 0.76 300 304 0.53 304 0.53 400 401 0.12 401 0.12 500 501 0.10 501 0.10

Ref. Thermometer Diff. Ref. Temp. Temp. (%}mean Temp. Altek Stack Stack 

### Altek

0 4 0.87 1200 200 205 0.76 1400 400 401 0.12 1600 600 604 0.38 1800 800 804 0.32 1000 1004 0.27

## Thermometer~ Diff. Temp. (%) mean Probe Probe

5 1.09 102 0.36 205 0.76 304 0.53 401 0.12 500 0.00

Thermometer' Diff. Temp. (%) mean

Aux Aux

5 1.09 102 0.36 205 0.76 304 0.53 401 0.12 501 0.10

Thermometer Diff. Temp. (%)mean Stack 

### Stack 1201 0.06 1400 0.00 1604 0.19 1803 0.13

Revised 1 0/03



# E-9

## ARI Environmental, Inc. Gas Meter Thermometer Calibration Data Form Post-Test
Meter Box: Calibrator: Date: Barometric: Ambient Temp: 604178 B. Crane 8/18/2010

29.36

74 

## Reference Thermometer: Altek Thermocouple Source

Reference Thermometer Difference Thermometer Temperature Temperature (%)mean Temperature Altek Inlet Inlet Oulet

0 0 0.00 0 100 98 -0.36 98 200 200 0.00 200 300 300 0.00 300 400 396 -0.47 396 500 497 -0.31 497

Reference Thermometer Difference Thermometer Temperature Temperature {%)mean Temperature Altek Filter Filter Exit

0 0 0.00 0 100 99 -0.18 98 200 201 0.15 200 300 300 0.00 300 400 396 -0.47 397 500 497 -0.31 497

Reference Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature (%)mean Altek Stack Stack

0 0 0.00 200 201 0.15 400 397 -0.35 600 600 0.00 800 801 0.08 1000 1000 0.00



# E-10 

# - 

# -
-- --

_. 

# --...-.-


# ---

-**-=~=**

Difference (%)mean

Oulet 0.00 -0.36 0.00 0.00 -0.47 -0.31

Difference (%)mean Exit 0.00 -0.36 0.00 0.00 -0.35 -0.31

Reference 

# ..... 

# --

...._.__ ..,....ENVIRONMENTAL

........ INC.



## Thermometer Difference Temperature (%)mean Probe Probe

0 0.00 99 ·0.18 201 0.15 301 0.13 397 -0.35 497 -0.31

Thermometer Difference Temperature (%)mean Aux Aux

0 0.00 98 -0.36 201 0.15 300 0.00 397 -0.35 497 -0.31

Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature {%)mean Altek Stack Stack 1200 1198 -0.12 1400 1396 -0.22 1600 1599 -0.05 1800 1797 -0.13

Revised 1 0/03

## ARI Environmental, Inc. Gas Meter Thermometer Calibration Data Form Pre -Test
Meter Box: Calibrator: 

## Date: Barometric: Ambient Temp: 901001 B. Crane 1/29/2010

29.76

74 

## Reference Thermometer: Altek Thermocouple Source

Reference Thermometer Difference Thermometer Temperature Temperature (%)mean Temperature Altek Inlet Inlet Oulet

0 NA -1 100 97 200 199 300 299 400 395 500 496

Temperature Temperature (%)mean Temperature Altek Filter Filter Exit

0 -1 -0.22 -1 100 98 -0.36 98 200 199 -0.15 199 300 300 0.00 300 400 396 -0.47 396 500 497 -0.31 497

Reference Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature (%)mean Altek Stack Stack

0 -1 -0.22 200 199 -0.15 400 396 -0.47 600 599 -0.09 800 800 0.00 1000 999 -0.07 

# - 

# - - 

# - 

# - 

# = INC,



## Difference Thermometer Difference (%}mean Temperature (%}mean

Oulet Probe Probe -0.22 -1 -0.22 -0.54 97**~0.54** 

## -0.15 200 0.00 -0.13 299 -0.13 -0.58 396 -0.47 -0.42 497 -0.31

(%}mean Temperature (%}mean Exit Aux Aux -0.22 -1 -0.22 -0.36 98 -0.36 -0.15 200 0.00 0.00 300 0.00 -0.47 396 -0.47 -0.31 497 -0.31

Reference Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature (%)mean Altek Stack Stack 1200 1197 -0.18 1400 1395 -0.27 1600 1598 -0.10 1800 1795 -0.22

Revised 10/03


# E-11

### ARI Environmental, Inc. Gas Meter Thermometer Calibration Data Form Post-Test

Meter Box: Calibrator: Date: 

## 901001 B. Crane 8/20/2010 Barometric: 

## 29.18 Ambient Temp: 

## 78 Reference Thermometer: Altek Thermocouple Source


## Reference Thermometer Difference Thermometer Tern perature Temperature (%)mean Temperature Altek Inlet Inlet Quiet

0 NA 1 100 100 200 202 300 302 400 398 500 499

Reference Thermometer Difference Thermometer Temperature Temperature {%)mean Temperature Altek Filter Filter Exit

0 1 0.22 1 100 100 0.00 100 200 202 0.30 202 300 301 0.13 301 400 398 -0.23 398 500 498 -0.21 498

Reference Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature {%}mean Altek Stack Stack

0 1 0.22 200 202 0.30 400 398 -0.23 600 600 0.00 800 802 0.16 1000 1001 0.07



# E-12 

# - 

# - ._.. 

# __ ------ 

# --- 

# --.....- -----

Difference (%)mean

Quiet 0.22 0.00 0.30 0.26 -0.23 -0.10

Difference {%)mean Exit 0.22 0.00 0.30 0.13 -0.23 -0.21

Reference 

# ...... 

# --

...._.._**~ENVIRONMENTAL** ........ INC.



## Thermometer Difference Temperature (%)mean Probe Probe 1 0.22 100 0.00 202 0.30 302 0.26 398 -0.23 499 -0.10

Thermometer Difference Temperature {%)mean Aux Aux

1 0.22 100 0.00 202 0.30 301 0.13 398 -0.23 499 -0.10

Thermometer Difference Temperature Temperature {%)mean Altek Stack Stack 1200 1198 -0.12 1400 1393 -0.38 1600 1599 -0.05 1800 1798 -0.09

Revised 1 0/03pitot calibration



# Pitot Tube Inspection Data

Client Name:

----------- Pre-Sample Post-Sample Date: 10/29/2009 Date: 8/19/2010



# y level? 

# y
N obstructions? 

# N
N damaged? 

# N
0 -too< a 1 

## <+too 

# 1

1

**-too<~<** 

## +too 

# 0

0 -so< Pt <+5o 

# 1

2 -so< P2<+5o 

# 1

1 y 

# 1

1 9 

# 0
0.860 A 

# 0.86

0.430 0.39375 < PA< 0.5625 

# 0.430

0.430 0.39375 < PB< 0.5625 

# 0.430
0.375 O.t875 :$ 

## Dt$ 0.375 

# 0.375 

# F¥ i 

# 8''

**-~**

I : ' I \ '
Tmns\'crsc

_ 

# ! rv-i 

# I {';:)(r:\ 

# I

TubeAxis



## ·-·~·-·~~--·-· 

## I I 

# ! 

# 0.015 A tan 

# y < 0.125" 

# 0.015
0.01501 A tan 9 

# < 0.03125" 

# 0.00000



# TRUE p A= 

## PB +/- 0.063 

# TRUE

PASS PASS/FAIL PASS

Comments: 

## 5' effective length s-type pitot tube, 3/8" tips, K-type thermocouple, assembly attached to heated MS probe.

Pitot tube/probe number 

# 292 meets or exceeds all specifications and criteria and/or applicable design features (per 40CFR60 Appendix A; Method 2) and is heareby assigned a pi tot tube calibration factor of 0.84.

Signature: Date: 

# E

**~3**pitot calibration



# Pitot Tube Inspection Data

Client Name:



# ----------------------- Pre-Sample Post-Sample Date: 9/30/2009 Date: 8/20/20 10

Transven;c Tube Axis B

A

# ~,z

# ·~-· B

# ~· 

# I 

# f¥**·~** I : ' I \ '



# ___ Jry-;

__ j/?vB\1 ·-·

# ~~~ y


# N
N

1



# 0

0

2

2

0

0.730

0.360

0.370

0.250

0.025

0.00000

TRUE



# PASS level? 

# y

obstructions? 

# N

damaged? 

# N

-10° < (11 

## < +10° 

# 0

-10° < 

# <Xz < +10° 

# 1

-so< Pl <+so 

# 1

.so< P2< +so 

# 0

'Y 

# 0



# a 0

A 

# 0.73

0.2625 <PA< 0.375 

# 0.360

0.2625 < PB< 0.375 

# 0.370

0.1875 :::; Dt::; 0.375 

# 0.250

A tan 

## y < 0.125" 

# 0.000

A tan 

# a < 0.03125" 

# 0.00000

p A 

# = PB +/- 0.063 

# TRUE


# PASS/FAIL PASS

Comments: 6' effective length M2 pitot tube, 1/4" tips, K-type thermocouple, and Orsat line enclosed in 1" OD sheath.

Pitot tube/probe number 

# 692 meets or exceeds all specifications and criteria and/or applicable design features (per 40CFR60 Appendix A; Method 2) and is heareby assigned a pi tot tube calibration factor of 0.84.

Signature: Date: 

# E-14pitot calibration



# Pitot Tube Inspection Data

Client Name:



# ---------------------- Pre-Sample Post-Sample Date: 2/17/2010 Date: 8/20/2010



# y level?



# N obstructions?



# N damaged?



# 0 -10" < a 1 

## < 

## +10"



# 2 -10" < fl2, 

## < +10"



# 2 -5°<**~1** 

## <+5°



# 0 -5" <**<+5"** 

# 0 y


# 1 

# e

0.730 A


# 0.360 0.2625 <PA<0.375



# 0.370 0.2625 <P 8 

## < 0.375



# 0.250 0.1875 ::£DrS 

## 0.375 

# ri I

# ~ 

# ·q

I : · t \ ·

# Tfla~~YAcm: ·-·

# ~ . 

# _jf;:VB\1

. -·**\lw~1S ~** **~~** 

# i I**~** 

# 0.000 A tan 

# y 

# < 0.125"



# 0.01274 A tan 

# e < 0.03125"



# TRUE P A 

# = Ps +/- 0.063



# PASS 

# PASS/FAIL

Comments: 6' effective length M2 s-type pitot tube, 1/4" tips, K-type thermocouple, enclosed in l" OD sheath.

Pitot tube/probe number 

# 836 meets or exceeds all specifications and criteria and/or applicable design features (per 40CFR60 Appendix A; Method 2) and is heareby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor of0.84.

Signature: Date: 

# y

N

N

2

0

2

0

1

0

0.73

0.360

0.370

0.250

0.013

0.00000



# TRUE

PASS

E-15pitot calibration



# Pitot Tube Inspection Data

Client Name:



# ---------------------- Pre-Sample Post-Sample Date: 10/29/2009 Date: 8/20/2010



# y level? 

# y

N obstructions? 

# N

N damaged? 

# N

0 -10" < a 1 

## < +10" 

# 1

0 -10" 

## <**~** 

## < +10" 

# 0

1 -5°<**~1** 

## <+5" 

# 0

2 -5"<**~2<+5"** 

# 0

2 y 

# 1

1 a 

# 1

# ~-z 

# ·<},.--"A-

. 

# .:::-.-r----**~-13** • 

# 0.910 A 

# 0.96

0.450 0.39375 <PA< 0.5625 

# 0.480

0.460 0.39375 <P 8 

## < 0.5625 

# 0.480

0.375 0.1875 cS Dt$ 

## 0.375 

# 0.375

0.032 A 

## tan 

## y < 0.125" 

# 0.017

0.01588 A 

## tan 

## a< 0.03125" 

# 0.01676



# TRUE P A= 

## P 8 

## +/- 0.063 

# TRUE

PASS PASS/FAIL 

# PASS

Comments: 4' effective lengths-type pitot assembly, 3/8" pitot tips, K-type thermocouple, attached to glass-lined M5 probe.

Pitot tube/probe number 

# 854 meets or exceeds all specifications and criteria and/or applicable design features (per 40CFR60 Appendix A; Method 2) and is heareby assigned a pitot tube calibration factor of 0.84.

Signature: Date:



# E-16

# ---- ARI Environmental Inc. 

# - - ....., 

# __ 

# -

... 

# -- .,_.,- Thermocouple Calibration Data Form

# ~=--­ iiiia

---- - 

# -**--~-­** 

# .... 

# -- 'fii"'ENVIRONMENrAJ. INC.


## Calibrator: B. Crane Thermocouple ID. 292 pretest posttest Date: 10/29/2009 8/19/201 0 Barometric: 29.31 29.24 Reference Thermometer 

# = Mercury in glass

Reference Reference Meter Point Thermometer Readout Difference Number Source Temperature Temperature 

# (%)

Pre- T.C Ice Water 33.0 35.1 -0.43 Test Ambient 68.0 66.2 0.34 Hot Water 211.0 208.7 0.34

Post- T.C Ice Water 34.0 34.5 -0.10 Test Ambient 86.0 84.1 0.35 Hot Water 212.0 211.8 0.03

a (temp. diff.) 

## = (ref.temp + 460)- (Thermo. temp.+ 460) 

## I (ref. temp. +460) x 100

Where -1.5 <a< 1.5



# E-17

# ---- ARI Environmental Inc. 

# ------ - 

# - .,_,.. 

# ___ _ Thermocouple Calibration Data Form 

# --i!:i-i

- - - iii

### -~ - 

# 11 

# I 

# i,.,_ I**'t!\11/VIRONMENTA~** INC.


## Calibrator: 

## B. Crane Thermocouple ID. 692 pretest posttest Date: 9/30/2009 8/20/201 0 Barometric: 29.43 29.18 Reference Thermometer 

# = Mercury in glass

Reference Reference Meter Point Thermometer Readout Difference Number Source Temperature Temperature 

# (%)

Pre- T.C Ice Water 34.0 34.7 -0.14 Test Ambient 69.0 70.2 -0.23 Hot Water 210.0 209.1 0.13

Post- T.C Ice Water 34.0 33.2 0.16 Test Ambient 89.0 86.7 0.42 Hot Water 211.0 211.5 -0.07

a (temp. diff.) 

# = (ref.temp + 460)- (Thermo. temp. + 460) 

## I (ref. temp. +460) x 100

Where -1.5 <a< 1.5



# E-18

# ARI Environmental Inc. 

# - -

_. 

# -- -- 

# ___ .....,_ Thermocouple Calibration Data Form**~-....,.­** 

# ----- - 

# - ........ . 'ti\NVIRONMENTAL

...... 1/\IC,


## Calibrator: B. Crane Thermocouple ID. 836 pretest posttest Date: 2/17/201 

# o 8/20/201 

# o Barometric: 29.23 29.18 Reference Thermometer 

# = Mercury in glass

Reference Reference Meter

Point Thermometer Readout Difference Number Source Temperature Temperature 

# (%)

Pre- T.C Ice Water 33.0 32.2 0.16 Test Ambient 64.0 61.3 0.52 Hot Water 211.0 210.0 0.15

Post- T.C Ice Water 34.0 32.7 0.26 Test Ambient 88.0 85.5 0.46 Hot Water 210.0 208.6 0.21

a (temp. diff.) 

# = (ref.temp + 460)- (Thermo. temp.+ 460) I 

## (ref. temp. +460) x 100

Where -1.5 <a< 1.5



# E-19

# ARI Environmental Inc. Thermocouple Calibration Data Form

Calibrator: B. Crane Thermocouple ID. 854 pretest posttest Date: 10/29/2009 8/20/201 0 Barometric: 29.31 29.18 Reference Thermometer= Mercury in glass

Reference Reference Meter

Point Thermometer Readout Difference Number Source Temperature Temperature {%)



## Pre- T.C Ice Water 33.0 34.5 -0.30 Test Ambient 67.0 65.9 0.21 Hot Water 211.0 209.1 0.28

Post- T.C Ice Water 34.0 33.6 0.08 Test Ambient 88.0 87.9 0.02 Hot Water 211.0 210.9 0.01

a (temp. diff.) 

# = (ref.temp + 460)- (Thermo. temp.+ 460) I 

## (ref. temp. +460) x 100

Where -1.5 <a< 1.5



# E-20

## Barometer Calibration Log

Vehicle Assignment

Client

Barometer No.

Date Ref. Barometer Reading (in. Hg) 

## Field Barometer Reading (in. Hg) as found 

## Adjusted Reading

Difference 

## * (in. Hg)



## Calibrator
Signature T9

738



## Pre-Test Post-Test

7/3/2010 7/25/2010

29.19 29.41

29.18 29.38

29.41

0.01 0.03

B. Crane 

# 1---/ B.Crane

# -bK_g~AI
Date 

# 7·25- k)

* Barometer is adjusted so that the difference is not to exceed 0.05" Hg ** Barometer is not adjusted. If difference exceeds 0.10" Hg, inform project Mgr. *** Barometric pressure may be obtained from a National Weather Service station and adjusted for elevation at a rate of -2.5mm (0.1") Hg per 100ft. Note: The Weather Service reading is absolute barometric pressure.



# E-21

# ---- 

# - - 

# - - 

# ------ ------ 

# -==-- 

# ,_- _._.- 

# -
__ ._._ 

# ___ ....__

..... ENVIRONMENTAL 

### Y' /NO. 

# APPENDIXF

899-02 

# Kohler Company: Kohler, WI Clay MACT ICR Data Gathering Test Dates: 8/3- 8/6/10 

# Test Program Qualifications

# -- 

# - ------- 

# ----- -;::::;; 

# --- 

# - 

# - -

_,___ 

# -



# ----- 

# .-

..._._ ..,ENVIRONMENTAL,... INC. 

# Test Program Qualifications

ARI Environmental's offices in Wauconda, Illinois and Pasadena, Texas specialize in conducting stack emission, fugitive leak detection, ambient air and in-plant OSHA type testing for industrial clients.

ARI is organized so that its facilities and resources meet the requirements of ASTM D7036, Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies. ARI's laboratories in Pasadena, Texas and Wauconda, Illinois hold TCEQ NELAP Certificate No. T104704428-8A-TX. During the past 27 years, ARI personnel have conducted over 5,000 separate stack emission tests for a variety of industrial clients throughout North America for the determination of degree of source compliance and to yield emissions data and control equipment performance data for inhouse engineering purposes.
ARI presently has over 80 trained personnel for conducting source emission sampling, fugitive leak detection monitoring, ambient air monitoring and OSHA sampling programs. All test programs are supervised and conducted by onsite Qualified Individuals (QI) and/or Qualified Source Testing Individuals {QSTI) pursuant to ASTM D7036.

The key personnel involved in the test program were as follows:


# Daniel Fitzgerald Mr. Fitzgerald is the Division Manager of ARI's Source Testing Division with offices located in Wauconda, Illinois and Houston, Texas. With over 32 years experience in process evaluation, emission compliance and control equipment efficiency test programs, Mr. Fitzgerald specializes in the technical planning, coordination and performance of environmental test programs. Mr. Fitzgerald has an extensive background in EPA sampling and analysis applications, incinerator design and optimization, VOC sampling and analysis, RCRA trial burn testing, sampling equipment design and fabrication, implementation of innovative sampling and analysis techniques, methods validation and R&D. Mr. Fitzgerald is presently certified as a QSTI by the Source Evaluation Society (SES) pursuant to the requirements of ASTM D7036-04.

His source sampling experience includes conducting over 1 ,000 separate test programs involving emissions testing at automotive manufacturing, steel mills, refineries, printing operations, food processing, chemical plants, fume incineration systems, hazardous waste incinerators, bulk gasoline terminals and power plants. 

# Jerry Bovee Mr. Bovee is a Senior Project Manager with ARI. His 19 years of experience includes emission compliance and CEM certification testing for a wide variety of industries including petrochemical, steel mills, electric utilities, cement plants, pulp and paper mills, asphalt plants and general manufacturing plants. Mr. Bovee is presently certified as a QSTI by the SES pursuant to the requirements of ASTM D7036-04.

Nathan 

# Sekulic Mr. Sekulic is a Project Manager with ARI. His 9 years experience includes emission compliance and CEM certification testing for a wide variety of industries including petrochemical, steel mills, electric utilities, cement plants, asphalt plants and general manufacturing plants. Mr. Sekulic is presently certified as a Ql by the SES pursuant to the requirements of ASTM D7036-04.

F-1

# ---



# - ===- 

# =**~-- ~­**  

# ___ ...._.._ 

# -;::;; 

# -- - =

__ ...._ =



# -----
... = = ._._ "P"'"ENVIRONMENTAL

..... INC.



# Jeff Goldfine 

# Test Program Qualifications

Mr. Goldfine is a field technician specializing in sampling equipment preparation, maintenance and calibration, equipment setup, field sampling, sample recovery, and posttest equipment clean up. Mr. Goldfine has over 5 years experience in conducting various source emission test programs. Mr. Goldfine is presently certified as a Ql by the 

# SES pursuant to the requirements of 

# ASTM 07036-04.

Andrew Hornbeck Mr. Hornbeck is a field technician specializing in sampling equipment preparation, maintenance and calibration, equipment setup, field sampling, sample recovery, and posttest equipment clean up. Ryan Lyons Mr. Lyons is a field technician specializing in sampling equipment preparation, maintenance and calibration, equipment setup, field sampling, sample recovery, and posttest equipment clean up.



# F-2**@JUt~ I~**  rrJJE

**~ ~**  **~ ~**  **~ ~**  **~ ~**  **~** soURCE

EVALUATION

SOCIETY

8 Qualified Source Testing Individual

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT DANIEL E. FITZGERALD

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION AND SATISFIED

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES

ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDIVIDUAL REVIEW BOARD FOR

MANUAL GAS VOLUME MEASUREMENTS AND ISOKINETIC PARTICULATE

SAMPUNG METHODS

ISSUED THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008 AND EFFECTIVE UNTIL NOVEMBER 4TH, 2013
**~~~ 7.l/Jro•~··-** 

Peter S. Pakalnls, QSTI/QSTO Review Board **~/f.~**

John

R. Smith, QSTI/QSTO Review Board APPLICATION NO. 2008-218 til**lmlft~** lrl lf:J lrJ lfJ ltd lf:J lf.J lrJ **I~ r~**  ffJ ff;!JNj[Jj **~FJ** r;=J **iw=~** ;;;; **j~== .~.**  **-~-**

**,•,·-~Gn•••'** soURCE EVALUATION SOCIETY

**~** Qualified Source Testing Individual

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT DANIEL E. FITZGERALD

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION AND SATISFIED

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES

ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDIVIDUAL REVIEW BOARD FOR

MANUAL GASEOUS POLLUTANTS SOURCE SAMPUNG METHODS

ISSUED THIS STH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008 AND EFFECTIVE UNTIL NOVEMBER 4TH, 2013

**9&-=:,tw~** ::;::::=-

Peter R. Westfln, QSTf!QSTO Review Board 1-/!JJi PeterS. Paka/nls, QSTI/QSTO Review Board APPLICATION NO. 2008-218 **I~'**

**~** t::::

-,

- ..... "'1·4,_. **~ ~--**  _:_;__ **-~ -~'**  {f ;:-

·- ... ;_;:.;_ "; ·:. **~:**

.· .. -- · .. **~---** ': **·:~**

' **~no** - **-~·** :'

.

:·: **_.~-~-** .,: ..:.::...:....·.:.,"' !'

: .. : **~--·st ~** 

l **;f:~t;**

.. **:~- :::~~**  **~r ~** 

- f . . **~~:t:,** j

**~** - **-~** :;S **'-~­ .--:~**  IIi IIW lil**""""""""""""'"""'"'""""""""""'"_;;;;_="-"--'-"-=-=="'"'""""'""="'-'"""""'~""'""".:..::===c....·~**
**T.:D1:lffgpj'2~;j ~2J~J**  L:!J L-=· -·':

**~~** ;:;;.

**,.~ 7**  ;

**•'-''-"""-~""····~·~·'·h~**

.• -..""·"·" ......... 4 ... **,.,~_-** ........ **~·--~-"'--·--------** ... **--~- ·~···-'·'**  **----~·-** ·- **~;:r;**
soURCE EVALUATION SOCIETY

**~** Qualified Source Testing Individual

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT DANIEL E. FITZGERALD

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION AND SATISFIED

EXPERIENCE

REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES

ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDIVIDUAL REVIEW BOARD FOR

GASEOUS POLLUTANTS INSTRUMENTAL SAMPLING METHODS

ISSUED THIS STH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2008 AND EFFECTIVE UNTIL NOVEMBER 4H, 2013

**9.~\j~** ?:::> 1tlJJro-we- APPLICATION NO. 2008-218 ., f';... .-:;. /'

\

\\; .. ,...; .· .l.L r',

,... -... ··r.,.,...

'";;e·

.. "

. _..._,

Peter s. Pakalnls, QSTIIQSTO Review Board **f~** -- **-··~·~·~** --··:6; **·~** = = = = = ; **~** sOURCE EVALUATION SOCIETy

**~ ~** 

Qualified Source Testing Individual

LET IT BE KNOWN THAT JERRY A. BOVEE

HAS SUCCESSFULLY PASSED A COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION AND SATISFIED

EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES

ISSUED BY THE SES QUALIFIED SOURCE TEST INDIVIDUAL REVIEW BOARD FOR

GASEOUS POLLUTANTS INSTRUMENTAL SAMPUNG METHODS

ISSUED THIS grH DAY OF JULY 2009 AND EFFECTIVE UNTIL JULY 7' 111 2014

Peter R. Westlln, QSTVQSTO Review Board

1!/Wj PeterS. Palra/nli, Q$TilQSTORiwlew Boaiii John R. Smith, QST/IQSTO Review Board APPLICATION NO.

2009-354 Iii **~** = **~ ~**  ; **~** ; **~ ~** =====I==soURCEEVALUATIONSOCIETY8QualifiedSourceTestingIndividualLETITBEKNOWNTHATJERRYA.BOVEEHASSUCCESSFULLYPASSEDACOMPREHENSIVEEXAMINATIONANDSATISFIEDEXPERIENCEREQUIREMENTSINACCORDANCEWITHTHEGUIDELINESISSUEDBYTHESESQUALIFIEDSOURCETESTINDIVIDUALREVIEWBOARDFORMANUALGASVOLUMEMEASUREMENTSANDISOKINETICPARTICULATESAMPLINGMETHODSISSUEDTHISgmDAYOFJULY2009ANDEFFECTIVEUNTILJULY7TH,2014'PeterR.Westlln,QSTIIQSTOReviewBoarct----.,.,KarenD.Kejiy&-Mills,QSTi/QSTOReviewBoardJOhnR.Smith,QSTIIQSTOReviewBoarct1!1===I===IJ!J