alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick 

JORGE QUANT 

v. Record No. 0079-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

 PER CURIAM 

THE SALVATION ARMY, INC. JULY 18, 1995 

AND 

RELIANCE NATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY 

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Arturo Hernandez, on brief), for appellant. 

 (Dawn E. Boyce; Trichilo, Bancroft, McGavin, Horvath & 

Judkins, on brief), for appellees. 

 Jorge Quant contends that the Workers' Compensation 

Commission erred in finding that (1) he was able to return to his 

pre-injury work; and (2) he failed to prove that arthroscopic 

surgery was reasonable and necessary. Specifically, the claimant 

argues that the commission erred in accepting the opinions of 

other doctors over that of his treating orthopedic surgeon, Dr. 

Mark W. Theiss. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the 

parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. 

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 

5A:27. 

 On appellate review, we must view the evidence in the light 

most favorable to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. 

Corp. v. Mullins, 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 

 

 *Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not 

designated for publication. 
 2 

(1990). "[I]t is fundamental that a finding of fact made by the 

Commission is binding and conclusive upon this court on review. 

A question raised by conflicting medical opinion is a question of 

fact." Commonwealth v. Powell, 2 Va. App. 712, 714, 347 S.E.2d 

532, 533 (1986). "Medical evidence is not necessarily 

conclusive, but is subject to the commission's consideration and 

weighing." Hungerford Mechanical Corp. v. Hobson, 11 Va. App. 

675, 677, 401 S.E.2d 213, 214 (1991). 

 While we have stated that the opinion of the treating 

physician is entitled to great weight, Pilot Freight Carriers, 

Inc. v. Reeves, 1 Va. App. 435, 439, 339 S.E.2d 570, 572 (1986), 

the law does not require that the treating physician's opinion be 

accepted over that of others. Accordingly, the commission was 

entitled to accept the opinions of the independent orthopedic 

surgeons, Drs. Robert O. Gordon and Joseph D. Linehan, over that 

of the treating orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Theiss, to find that the 

claimant was capable of returning to his pre-injury work and that 

surgery was not reasonable or necessary. 

 The commission noted that, "[w]hile we are reluctant to rule 

against treatment recommended by a treating orthopedic surgeon, 

we are impressed in this case by the opinions of two physicians 

who indicate the claimant is exaggerating his symptoms." The 

commission also based its denial of recovery for the surgery upon 

the claimant's documented failure to fully cooperate with the 

independent orthopedic examinations, and upon the lack of 
 3 

objective findings indicating a need for surgery at the present 

time. The opinions of Drs. Gordon and Linehan constitute 

credible evidence to support the commission's decision. 

 For the reasons stated, we affirm the commission's decision. 

 Affirmed.
SEC Connect





 











Exhibit 10.13



 


	


	
Autobytel
Inc.

Human
Resources Department


18872
MacArthur Blvd, Suite 200


Irvine,
CA 92612-1400


Voice:
(949) 225-4572









 







January 31, 2017

 


 



TO:                       

Glenn
Fuller







FROM:                 



Jeff
Coats – President and CEO






 



RE: Salary Increase


 


It is a
pleasure to inform you of your salary increase. Following is a
summary of your salary increase.


 


	
Position:

	
EVP, Chief Legal
and Administrative Officer and Secretary


	
New
Semi-monthly Rate:

	
$13,343.75 ($320,250
Approximate Annually)


	
Effective
Date:

	
January 1,
2017







 


Your
salary increase is conditioned upon your acceptance of the
foregoing modifications to the terms and conditions of your
employment with Autobytel Inc. If you accept these modifications to
the terms of your employment, please acknowledge your acceptance in
the space provided below.


 


As a
reminder, your employment is at will and not for a specified term
and may be terminated by the Company or you at any time, with or
without cause or good reason and with or without prior, advance
notice. This “at-will” employment status will remain in
effect throughout the term of your employment by the Company and
cannot be modified except by a written amendment to this promotion
letter that is executed by both parties (which in the case of the
Company, must be executed by the Company’s Chief Legal
Officer) and that expressly negates the “at-will”
employment status.


 


Please
feel free to call if you have any questions.


 



Autobytel Inc.


 


 


By:
/s/ Jeff
Coats          




       President
and CEO


 


 


Accepted
and Agreed:


 


 



/s/ Glenn
Fuller         
  



Glenn
Fuller
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Stuart Oland Wheeler

Appellate case number: 01-14-00868-CR

Trial court case number: 2014V-0074

Trial court: 155th District Court of Austin County

On December 18, 2014, Stuart Oland Wheeler filed a Motion for More Time to File 

Brief. The motion is GRANTED. Wheeler’s brief is due January 2, 2014. The response from 

the State of Texas, if any, is due January 22, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: __/s/_Rebeca Huddle

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 30, 2014
1 From:
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 2:50 PM

To: RedHill Subject: Take tanks offline today

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Why are we even trying to repair these tanks? They should have been shut down in January 2014 when original catastrophic failure occurred. 27000 gallons of jet fuel into our ground water is a catastrophe.

1) These tanks are so old that by the time you finish the project, they will need to be repaired, and replaced again. 2) Anything that is this comp licated to repair and replace is not a good idea in the first place. 3) Why bother doing risk assessment? It has already happened. The risk is 100%. 4) Why bother with monitoring? Ther e is nothing that can be done once the fuel leaks into the basalt rock. We have to wait how long for the damage to be cleaned? 100 years? 1000 years? What is the point of monitoring if all that it will do is tell us that a leak occurred, but we won't be able to clean up

the fuel in the rock.

From a strategic or operational standpo int, why do we think it is a good i dea to store that much fuel in a single place? Do we think it's a good idea to keep a facility operational that is extremely complicated to maintain and will take 20 years to repair? At t he end of 20 years, we will ne ed to start repairs all over again on the now 95 year old tanks.

Since there is no way to remediate the damage once a failure occurs, prevention is the only option.

I submit that the Navy should already have a contingency plan in place for the catastrophic failure of entire facility (e.g. in event of earthquake or bom b or something...). The catastrophic failure has already occurred and we should implement the contingency plan.

This facility should be shut down immediately. The t anks should be emptied and we can turn it in to a

tourist attraction.

I do not agree with the AOC or SOW.

Thanks,
Exhibit 99.3

            Annual Servicing Report of Industry Mortgage Company L.P.


COOPERS & LYBRAND

Report of Independent Accountants--Uniform Single Attestation Program


To the Board of Directors of
IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries

We have examined the assertion by IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries'
management about compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified
in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
                                                 --------------------------
Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31,
----------------------------
1996 included in the accompanying management assertion.  Management is
responsible for IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries' compliance with those
minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion about the entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accounts and accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries' compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries' compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of
and for the year ended December 31, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material
respects


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Tampa, Florida
February 21, 1997


As of and for the year ended December 31, 1996, IMC Mortgage Company and
Subsidiaries has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
                                                                     --------
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same
-----------------------------------------------
period, IMC Mortgage Company and Subsidiaries had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amount of $7,000,000.


                                        /s/ Thomas G. Middleton
                                        Thomas G. Middleton, President and
                                             Chief Operating Officer


                                        /s/ Stuart D. Marvin
                                        Stuart D. Marvin, Chief Financial
                                             Officer
## Lak e Minchumin aHomeowner' s Associatio n - . P O Bo x 3 6 Lak e Minchumina , Alaska , 9975 7

907-'674-321 5 U.S . Departmen t

of Transportatio n Offic e o f Secretary o f

Transportatio n Jun e 28 , 201 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Referenc e letter , Jun e 18 , 2j)1 0 •DOT-OS T 2008-023 7 18,2p i Dear Sirs , After takin g avot e at

th e Lake Minchumin aHomeowner' s Associatio n meeting , th e majority o f th e Lak e Minchumin acommunit y support s Wrigh t Essentia l Ai r

Servic e optio n numbe r

two . Ou r secon dchoic e wa s Wrigh t Ai r Servic e optio n numbe r

one . W e di dhav e aunanimou s decisio n that

n o on e i n th e communit y wishe s t o hav e Evert' s Ai r Alaska . Havin g tw o flight s a week wil l hel p th e economi c viability o f ou r fly-i n onl y community . Than k yo u for considerin g ou r opinio n in thi s vital matter . Sincerely , Thoma s Green , Vic e Presiden t Lak e Minchumin aHomeowner' s Associatio n

Sincerel y
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Webb Interactive Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William R. Cullen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    WILLIAM R.
CULLENWilliam R. Cullen Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer




Date: April 8, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                           10,014
<SECURITIES>                     67,923
<RECEIVABLES>                    25,922
<ALLOWANCES>                        270
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                105,860
<PP&E>                          199,399
<DEPRECIATION>                   40,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  266,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            46,829
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                          4,066
<OTHER-SE>                      213,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    266,600
<SALES>                         133,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                203,813
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   124,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  6,149
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                2,120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  88,079
<INCOME-TAX>                     34,798
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              53,281
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                     53,281
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      3.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                      3.29
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 124 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Daily Digest]
[Page D865]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

Committee Meetings
(Committees not listed did not meet)
SITUATION IN SYRIA
Committee on Armed Services: Committee received a closed briefing on 
the situation in Syria, after receiving testimony from Leon E. Panetta, 
Secretary, and Admiral James A. Winnefeld, Jr., USN, Vice Chairman of 
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, both of the Department of Defense.
NOMINATION
Committee on Indian Affairs: Committee concluded a hearing to examine 
the nomination of Kevin K. Washburn, of New Mexico, to be Assistant 
Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, after the nominee 
testified and answered questions in his own behalf.
```
May 22, 2013

Note to Docket No. FAA-2013-0234:

On May 13, 2013 Boeing responded to our request for additional information regarding 

means provided for a rapid descent, safety data related to rapid decompression, and data and 

analysis of uncontained engine rotor failures.

The supplemental information they provided is proprietary to Boeing, so it will not be 

posted in the public docket.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this annual report of Rush Enterprises, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Steven L. Keller, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By:    | /S/ STEVEN L.  KELLER                      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven L. Keller                           |
|   | Title: | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | March 13, 2009                        |

 

----
# Den Europæiske Unions L 30/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0634 |
| --- | --- |
| Den Europæiske Unions
  Tidende | L 30 |
| | |
| Dansk udgave | Retsforskrifter | 63. årgang3. februar 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0634

Den Europæiske Unions

Tidende

L 30

Dansk udgave

Retsforskrifter

63. årgang3. februar 2020

---

| Indhold | | Berigtigelser | Side |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Berigtigelse til Rådets afgørelse (EU) 2019/1815 af 24. oktober 2019 om beskikkelse af to medlemmer af og tre suppleanter til Regionsudvalget efter indstilling fra Republikken Slovenien ( EUT L 278 af 30.10.2019 ) | 1 |

Indhold

Berigtigelser

Side

*

Berigtigelse til Rådets afgørelse (EU) 2019/1815 af 24. oktober 2019 om beskikkelse af to medlemmer af og tre suppleanter til Regionsudvalget efter indstilling fra Republikken Slovenien ( EUT L 278 af 30.10.2019 )

( EUT L 278 af 30.10.2019 )

1

| DA | De akter, hvis titel er trykt med magre typer, er løbende retsakter inden for rammerne af landbrugspolitikken og har normalt en begrænset gyldighedsperiode.
  Titlen på alle øvrige akter er trykt med fede typer efter en asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

DA

De akter, hvis titel er trykt med magre typer, er løbende retsakter inden for rammerne af landbrugspolitikken og har normalt en begrænset gyldighedsperiode.

Titlen på alle øvrige akter er trykt med fede typer efter en asterisk.

---

Berigtigelser

| 3.2.2020 | DA | Den Europæiske Unions Tidende | L 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

DA

Den Europæiske Unions Tidende

L 30/1

---

Berigtigelse til Rådets afgørelse (EU) 2019/1815 af 24. oktober 2019 om beskikkelse af to medlemmer af og tre suppleanter til Regionsudvalget efter indstilling fra Republikken Slovenien

(
  Den Europæiske Unions Tidende L 278 af 30. oktober 2019
  )

Side 12, artikel 1, litra b), første led:

I stedet for:

| »— | Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor, « |
| --- | --- |

»—

Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor, «

župan Mestne občine Maribor

læses:

| »— | Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,«. |
| --- | --- |

»—

Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,«.

župan Mestne občine Maribor,

---
<PAGE>   1

                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                   STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                     PRO FORMA
                                                  NET LOSS PER SHARE             NET LOSS PER SHARE
                                                  ------------------             ------------------
                                                      YEAR ENDED                     YEAR ENDED
                                                 DECEMBER 31, 1996              DECEMBER 31, 1995
                                                 ------------------             ------------------
 <S>                                               <C>                          <C>
 Net Loss  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .              $  (858,116)                 $(6,036,335)
 Adjustment to interest expense
   assuming conversion of debt at
   beginning of period . . . . . . . . .                        -                      113,867
                                                      -----------                  -----------
 Adjusted net loss . . . . . . . . . . .              $  (858,116)                 $(5,922,468)
                                                      ===========                  ===========
 Weighted average shares used to
   compute pro forma net loss per
   share:
   Weighted average common
     shares outstanding  . . . . . . . .                6,621,442                    1,622,283
   Weighted average preferred
     shares outstanding -- assuming
     conversion  . . . . . . . . . . . .                        -                    1,747,231
   Weighted average convertible
     subordinated debentures --
     assuming conversion . . . . . . . .                        -                      322,209
   Additional shares pursuant to
     SAB83 computation . . . . . . . . .                  641,672                    2,917,848
                                                      -----------                  -----------
                                                        7,263,114                    6,609,571
                                                      ===========                  ===========
 Net loss per share  . . . . . . . . . .              $     (0.12)                 $     (0.90)
                                                      ===========                  ===========
</TABLE>



                                      E-6
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 199 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 199

 To repeal certain provisions of law relating to trading with Indians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 11 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

  Mr. Kyl (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal certain provisions of law relating to trading with Indians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL.

    Section 437 of title 18, United States Code, is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1603

 To amend the Small Business Act concerning the level of participation 
  by the Small Business Administration in loans guaranteed under the 
                    Export Working Capital Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 1996

  Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Lautenberg) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small 
                                Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Business Act concerning the level of participation 
  by the Small Business Administration in loans guaranteed under the 
                    Export Working Capital Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Export Enhancement 
Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION IN GUARANTEED LOANS UNDER EXPORT WORKING 
              CAPITAL PROGRAM.

    Section 7(a)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)(2)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Participation under export working capital 
                program.--Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), in an 
                agreement to participate in a loan on a deferred basis 
                under the Export Working Capital Program established 
                pursuant to paragraph (14)(A), such participation by 
                the Administration shall be equal to the rate specified 
                under this paragraph as in effect on the day before the 
                date of the enactment of the Small Business Lending 
                Enhancement Act of 1995.''.
                                 <all>
```