alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ronald Vernon SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert A. ERICKSON, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-3174.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 1993.

Decided Oct. 15, 1993.

*761See also, 402 N.W.2d 779.

Virginia G. Villa, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Minneapolis, MN, argued, for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Michael Richardson, Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, MN, argued, for defendant-ap-pellee.

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge, and HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Ronald Schneider appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.1 We affirm.

A jury found Schneider guilty of first degree murder, burglary, and kidnapping. During his separate sanity trial, the jury determined Schneider was legally responsible for his actions, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment plus two consecutive thirty-six month sentences. Schneider appealed his conviction, and the Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed.

Schneider claims that he was deprived a fair trial because, during his sanity trial, the prosecution commented on and submitted evidence regarding the fact that Schneider had originally retained the two psychiatrists who were called as witnesses for the prosecution. Specifically, Schneider argues that because he was compelled to produce the psychiatrists’ names, Minnesota Rules of Criminal Procedure 20.03 subd. 1 and 2; *State v. Dodis,*314 N.W.2d 233, 240 (Minn.1982), evidence relating to the fact that Schneider originally hired these witnesses violated his due process rights. Schneider compares his case to *Brecht v. Abrahamson,*— U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993) (discussing the prosecution commenting on a defendant’s *post-Miranda*silence); however, *Brecht*is inapposite here. The rule forbidding the prosecution from commenting on the accused’s silence rests on the fundamental unfairness and deprivation of due process in assuring a suspect that his silence will not be used against him and then using his silence to impeach him. *Doyle v.*
      *762
      *Ohio,*426 U.S. 610, 618, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 2246, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976).

The admissibility of evidence is “usually a matter of state law which does not involve federal constitutional issues and thus is not within the scope of habeas corpus relief.” *Nelson v. Hutto,*597 F.2d 137, 138 (8th Cir.1979). Whether the trial court committed an evidentiary error is a question of state law, and the state courts have already reviewed this case for such an error. *State v. Schneider,*402 N.W.2d 779, 788 (Minn.1987). Although a sufficiently egregious evidentiary error may rise to the level of a constitutional violation, *Atwell v. State of Arkansas,*426 F.2d 912, 915 (8th Cir.1970), Schneider has failed to demonstrate any fundamental unfairness or deprivation of due process. Because Schneider has failed to demonstrate a basis upon which habeas corpus relief may be granted, we affirm the district court.

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, presiding.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01402]



[[Page 4924]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Defense Science Board; Notice of Federal Advisory Committee 
Meeting; Cancellation

AGENCY: Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, 
Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 18, 2024, the DoD published a notice announcing a 
Federal Advisory Committee meeting of the Defense Science Board (DSB) 
that was to take place on January 18, 2024. The meeting has been 
cancelled.

DATES: Cancelled; open to the public Thursday, January 18, 2024, from 3 
p.m. to 3:45 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Elizabeth J. Kowalski, Designated 
Federal Officer (DFO): (703) 571-0081 (Voice), (703) 697-1860 
(Facsimile), <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4421282d3e252621302c6a2e6a2f2b332528372f2d6a272d320429252d286a292d28"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="51343d382b30333425397f3b7f3a3e26303d223a387f323827113c30383d7f3c383d">[email protected]</span></a>, (Email). Mailing 
address is Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 
20301-3140. Website: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Due to circumstances beyond the control of 
the Designated Federal Officer and the Department of Defense, the 
Defense Science Board was unable to provide public notification 
required by 41 CFR 102-3.150(a) concerning the cancellation of its 
January 18, 2024 meeting. Accordingly, the Advisory Committee 
Management Officer for the Department of Defense, pursuant to 41 CFR 
102-3.150(b), waives the 15-calendar day notification requirement.
    On January 18, 2024 (89 FR 3386), the DoD published a notice 
announcing a Federal Advisory Committee meeting of the Defense Science 
Board (DSB) that was to take place on January 18, 2024. The meeting has 
been cancelled. The meeting will be re-scheduled for a later date and 
an updated notice published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 19, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-01402 Filed 1-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus is Denied; Opinion Filed April 8 , 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 13
- 00386
- CV
IN RE JASON LOUIS MC DERMOTT , Relator On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 06883
- G
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang

- Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans Relator contends the trial judge erred in ordering in ca mera production of a tax return. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a ); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

130386F.P05 /David W. Evans/ DAVID W. EVANS JUSTICE
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1945

To broaden the scope of certain firearms offenses.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 11, 1996

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To broaden the scope of certain firearms offenses.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF TITLE 18.

4 Section 924(c)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is

5 amended by inserting after ‘‘uses or carries a firearm’’ the

6 following: ‘‘or has a firearm in close proximity to illegal

7 drugs or drug proceeds, in close proximity at the time of

8 his or her arrest, or in close proximity at the point of sale

9 of illegal drugs’’.

Æ
#### Patrick J. MURPHY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Patrick J. MURPHY, an individual; Murphy’s Markets, Inc., a California corporation; Ramsey Marketing and Management Co. (“Ramco”); aka: Ramsay Marketing and Management Co., a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION; First National Bank, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Patrick J. MURPHY, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 91-15511, 91-15640 and 91-15642.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 20, 1994.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.
II

Calendar No. 359

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1596

[Report No. 104–247]

To direct a property conveyance in the State of California.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 7 (legislative day, MARCH 6), 1996

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. JOHNSTON) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and

Natural Resources

MARCH 28, 1996

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To direct a property conveyance in the State of California.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ward Valley Land

5 Transfer Act’’.
2

S 1596 RS

1 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.

2 Effective upon the tendering to the Secretary of the

3 Treasury of $500,100 on behalf of the State of California

4 and the tendering to the Chairman of the Nuclear Regu5 latory Commission of a written commitment by the State

6 to carry out environmental monitoring and protection

7 measures based on recommendations of the National

8 Academy of Sciences subject to Federal oversight by the

9 Nuclear Regulatory Commission pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

10 2021, as amended, all right, title and interest of the

11 United States in the property depicted on a map des12 ignated USGS 7.5 minute quadrangle, west of Flattop

13 Mountain, CA 1984, entitled ‘‘Location Map for Ward

14 Valley Site’’, located in San Bernardino Meridian, Town15 ship 9 North, Range 19 East, and improvements thereon,

16 together with all necessary easements for utilities and in17 gress and egress to such property, including, but not lim18 ited to, the right to improve those easements, are conveyed

19 by operation of law to the Department of Health Services

20 of the State of California. Upon the request of the State

21 of California, the Secretary of the Interior shall provide

22 evidence of title transfer.

Calendar No. 359

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1596

[Report No. 104–247]

A BILL

To direct a property conveyance in the State of

California.

MARCH 28, 1996

Reported without amendment
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

August 13, 2007

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission100 F Street, N. E.Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submittedto the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complyingwith Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode. This certification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) accompanying this letter and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing, whether made before orafter the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.

I, Robert E.Driscoll, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirant AmericasGeneration, LLC (the “Company”), certify that, subject to thequalifications noted below, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mirant AmericasGeneration, LLC.
| Name:    |     | /s/ ROBERT E.  DRISCOLL       |   |
|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|     |     | Robert E. Driscoll                 |
| * * | * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Americas Generation, LLCand will be retained by Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
| **EXHIBIT 99.2** |
|------------------|

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB  of Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended June30, 2002, I, Thomas J. Sherman, Chief Financial Officer of Coast Bancorp,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBof Coast Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           the information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-QSB  ofCoast Bancorp for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CoastBancorp

Dated:  August 14, 2002

 
| /s/ Thomas J. Sherman   |
|-------------------------|
| THOMAS J. SHERMAN       |
|                    |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cal Bay International, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Roger Pawson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







/s/ Roger Pawson

Roger Pawson

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 23, 2005
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1516

Making appropriations to the Department of Health and Human Services

for retirement pay and medical benefits for commissioned officers of

the Public Health Service for the fiscal year ending September 30,

1996.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 5 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 1996

Mr. ROBB introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

Making appropriations to the Department of Health and

Human Services for retirement pay and medical benefits

for commissioned officers of the Public Health Service

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That there is hereby appropriated, out of any money in

4 the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the Depart5 ment of Health and Human Services for the fiscal year

6 ending September 30, 1996, for retirement pay and medi7 cal benefits of Public Health Service Commissioned Offi8 cers as authorized by law, and for payments under the
2

•S 1516 IS

1 Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection Plan and Survi2 vor Benefits Plan and for medical care of dependents and

3 retired personnel under chapter 55 of title 10, United

4 States Code, and for payments pursuant to section 229(b)

5 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 429(b)), such

6 amounts as may be required during such fiscal year.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned
President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 26, 2008 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                         |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  | /s/ JAMES J. BAUMBERGER
|                       |  | Name:                   |  | James J. Baumberger                  
|                       |  | Title:                  |  | President and chief executive officer
Exhibit 3.75
            
    /s/

(Registered Agent Signature




---



##### 



,
  /s/ Todd C. Johnson

Todd C. JohnsonIncorporator
 2
n'"r, ' r-\^. ~-. : 

### ?^OnW!O N

Januarys , 201 0 Exemptio nNo . 818 5 Regulator y Docke t

No . FAA-2003-1656 1 U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Managemen t

Syste m 40 0 1 ^ Stree t

SW , Roo mP L40 1 Washington , D C 20591-000 1 Dear Sirs/Madams , Wing s Airway s Inc. , doin g busines s a t 842 1 Livingsto nWay , Juneau , Alask a9980 1 i s requestin g renewa l o f

existin g Exemptio nNo . 8185 , Regulatory Docke t No . FA A 2003 - 16561 . Al l Facts , Circumstances , Condition s an dAre ao f Operatio nremai nth e same . Shoul dyo u hav e an y questions , pleas e cal l m e a t (907 ) 789-0790 . Sincerely , Da nCorso n Directo r o f Operation s Wing s Airway s



### 842 1 LIVINGSTO N WA Y

### * JUNEA U 

### * A K* 9980 1

* 907-789-986 3 * FA X 907-789- 3 1 S O * WWW.WINGSAIRWAYS.CO M *
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1984

To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of

1968 to require a 10 percent reduction in certain assistance to a State

under such title unless public safety officers who retire as a result

of injuries sustained in the line of duty continue to receive health insurance benefits.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 24, 1996

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Mr. MOYNIHAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe

Streets Act of 1968 to require a 10 percent reduction

in certain assistance to a State under such title unless

public safety officers who retire as a result of injuries

sustained in the line of duty continue to receive health

insurance benefits.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Alu-O’Hara Public Safety

5 Officers Health Benefits Act’’.
2

•S 1984 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS.

2 Part L of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and

3 Safe Streets Act of 1968 is amended by adding at the

4 end the following:

5 ‘‘SEC. 1204A. PROTECTION FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS.

6 ‘‘A grant made under part Q of this title that would

7 otherwise be made available to a State shall be reduced

8 by 10 percent unless a public safety officer who is sepa9 rated from service due to an injury suffered as the direct

10 and proximate result of a personal injury sustained in the

11 line of duty (during an emergency situation, or a hot pur12 suit as such terms are defined by State law) continues

13 after such injury to receive the same or better level of

14 health insurance benefits that are paid at the time of sepa15 ration by the State or unit of local government within the

16 State that employed such officer.’’.

17 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

18 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect

19 beginning on October 1 of the first fiscal year beginning

20 after the last day of the 2-year period beginning on the

21 date on the enactment of this Act.

Æ
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-5806 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-083-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters Model AS350B3 helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 427 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent takeoff without hydraulic pressure in the 

tail rotor (T/R) hydraulic system, loss of T/R flight control, and subsequent loss of control of the 

helicopter.

Costs:

Labor per Helicopter

(0.5 work hours X $85 for 

the RFM revision)

$43

Total Cost per Helicopter $43

Total U.S. Fleet Cost $18,361

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Stephen Barbini
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1680 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1680

 
  To amend title 18 of the United States Code to permit the judicial 
                    deportation of criminal aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 1996

 Mr. Coverdell introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend title 18 of the United States Code to permit the judicial 
                    deportation of criminal aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDICIAL DEPORTATION.

    Section 3583 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as 
        subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively;
            (2) in the first sentence, by inserting ``(1)'' before 
        ``The'';
            (3) by striking the ninth sentence; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2)(A) Notwithstanding any provision of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, if an alien defendant is subject to deportation, the 
court may order, as a condition of supervised release, that he be 
deported and remain outside the United States, and that he be delivered 
to a duly authorized immigration official for deportation in accordance 
with such order.
    ``(B) While such alien defendant is awaiting deportation pursuant 
to such order, the Attorney General shall take such alien into custody 
and shall not release such alien on bond, parole, or otherwise, unless 
so permitted by order of the sentencing court.
    ``(C) During the period such an alien defendant is to remain 
outside the United States as a condition of supervised release, the 
Attorney General may not consent to the reentry of such alien.
    ``(D) Nothing in this section prevents the Attorney General from 
initiating deportation proceedings against such an alien defendant 
pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act, but such alien 
defendant may not be released from custody except pursuant to this 
section.''.
                                 <all>
```