alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Guangshen Railway Company Limited

The following table lists information concerning the significant subsidiaries of Guangshen Railway Company Limited, or the Company, as of
December 31, 2011:



|                                                                           |  |                          |  |                                           |       |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------- | ----- | -
|Name                                                                       |  | Country of
Incorporation |  | Percentage of Interest heldby the Company |      
|                                                                           |  |                         
|Guangshen Railway Dongqun Trade and Commerce Service Company               |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Fu Yuan Enterprise Development Company Limited                    |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Guangshen Railway Travel Service Ltd.                             |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Pinghu Qun Yi Railway Store Loading and Unloading Company Limited |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 55    | %
|Dongguan Changsheng Enterprise Company Limited                             |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 51    | %
|Shenzhen Railway Station Passenger Services Company Limited                |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 100   | %
|Guangzhou Tielian Economy Development Company Limited                      |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 50.5  | %
|Shenzhen Nantie Construction Supervision Company Limited                   |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 76.66 | %
|Guangzhou Railway Huangpu Service Company Limited                          |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Guangshen Railway Economic and Trade Enterprise Company Limited   |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Railway Property Management Company Limited                       |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Shenhuasheng Storage and Transportation Company Limited           |  | PRC                      |  |                                           | 100   | %
II

Calendar No. 626

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2100

To provide for the extension of certain authority for the Marshal of the

Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Police.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20, 1996

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

SEPTEMBER 24, 1996

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To provide for the extension of certain authority for the

Marshal of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court

Police.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION. 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

4 Section 9(c) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act relating to

5 the policing of the building and grounds of the Supreme

6 Court of the United States’’, approved August 18, 1949
2

•S 2100 PCS

1 (40 U.S.C. 13n(c)) is amended in the first sentence by

2 striking ‘‘1996’’ and inserting ‘‘2000’’.
Calendar No. 626

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2100

A BILL

To provide for the extension of certain authority for

preme Court Police.the Marshal of the Supreme Court and the SuSEPTEMBER 24, 1996

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 34 (Friday, February 20, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 9259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03448]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2014-0554; FRL-9923-17-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 
Emissions Inventories for the Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston-Galveston-
Brazoria Ozone Nonattainment Areas

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) 
submitted to meet Emissions Inventory (EI) requirements of the Clean 
Air Act (CAA) for the Dallas-Fort-Worth (DFW) and the Houston-
Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) nonattainment areas. EPA is proposing to 
approve the SIP revisions because they satisfy the CAA EI requirements 
for the DFW and HGB nonattainment areas under the 2008 eight-hour ozone 
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). EPA is proposing to 
approve the revisions pursuant to section 110 and part D of the CAA and 
EPA's regulations.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before March 23, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air 
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be 
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following 
the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final 
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nevine Salem, (214) 665-7222, 
salem.nevine@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct rule 
without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action no 
further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the 
direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received 
will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed 
rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties 
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is 
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: February 9, 2015.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2015-03448 Filed 2-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
The HONORABLE JOSEPH F. BATAILLON, United States Dis trict Judge for 1 the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-3287

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Sheyenne Tooling & Manufacturing * [UNPUBLISHED] Co., Inc., * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 10, 1998 Filed: August 27, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and BATAILLON, District Judge. 1

___________ PER CURIAM.Th e Honorable Bruce M. Van Sickle, United States District Judge for th e 2 District of North Dakota. Given the unique circumstances of th is case, we deny the government’s motion 3 to dismiss the appeal as untimely taken. -2- Sheyenne Tooling and Manufacturing Co., Inc. (Sheyenne) appeals from th e district court’s denial of its request for attorn ey fees under the Equal Access to Justice

2 Act (EAJA). 28 U.S.C. § 2412. We affirm. 3 Sheyenne operates a metal production facility in Cooperstown, North Dakota. On August 4, 1995, the government filed an action against Sheyenne for violations of the Cl ean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq., and of various regulations issue d thereunder. On December 30, 1996, the district court found that Sheye nne had violated the Act and the regulations. In proposed settlement discussions, the United State s rec ommended

and sought a penalty of $336,000.00. The court assessed penaltie s against Sheyenne in the amount of $60, 150.00. Sheyenne then sought attorney fees as a prevailing party pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(b). To be considered a prevailing party under the EAJA, the party must receive at least some relief on its claim. See Securities and Exch. Comm’n v. Comserv Corp. , 908 F.2d 1407, 1412 (8th Cir. 1990). We agree with the district court that Sheyenne is not a prev ailing party. The United States successfully sought the imposition of a penalty against Sheyenne. The fact that Sheyenne’s pen alty was substantially less than that sought did not

transform Sheyenne into a prevailing party. See Beall Constr. Co. v. Oc cupational Safety and Health Review Comm’n , 507 F.2d 1041, 1047 (8th Cir
. 1974). Sheyenne points to a rec ent amendment to the EAJA under which attorney fees may be awarded when “the demand by the United States is substantially in excess of the judgment finally obtained by the United States and is unreasonable when compared-3-

with such judgment . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (d)(1)(D). This provision, however, i s effective only with respect to cases filed on or after March 29, 1996, and therefore does not apply in this case. The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 1, 2016

a0628 

# Order

Clerk July 1, 2016

153625 & (58)(59)(60)(68)

SEJASMI INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff/Counter

- Defendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 153625

COA: 328292

Macomb CC: 2014

- 004273

- CB

A+ MOLD, INC., d/b/a TAKUMI

MANUFACTURING COMPANY,

Defendant/Cross

- Defendant,

and

QUALITY CAVITY, INC.,

Defendant/Counter

- Plaintiff/Cross

- Plaintiff/Third

- Party Plaintiff

- Appellant,

and

NKL MANUFACTURING, INC.,

Third

- Party Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and the motion for

leave to file brief amici curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the

April 5, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because

we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior

to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals. The motion for

stay o f trial court proceedings is DENIED.

V IVIANO , J., did not participate due to a familial relationship with the presiding

circuit court judge in this case.
```

[Federal Register: June 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 116)]
[Notices]               
[Page 34516]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17jn10-133]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7055]

 
Determination and Waiver of Section 7073(a) of the Department of 
State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
2010 (Div. H, Pub. L. 111-117) Relating to Assistance for the 
Independent States of the Former Soviet Union

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me as Deputy Secretary of 
State, including by section 7073(a) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Div. H, Pub. 
L. 111-117) (the Act), Executive Order 13118 of March 31, 1999, and 
State Department Delegation of Authority No. 245-1, I hereby determine 
that it is in the national security interest of the United States to 
make available funds appropriated under the heading ``Assistance for 
Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia'' of the Act, without regard to the 
restriction in section 7073(a).
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 21, 2010.
James B. Steinberg,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-14698 Filed 6-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-23-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       8,295,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               96,195,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,677,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             129,085,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        73,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,071,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               129,085,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            46,888,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,870,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             8,814,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,870,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,334,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,933,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,401,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,401,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
        

</TABLE>
SERVED: JANUARY 9, 2012 

nuOAOri^^jqjTQp 

U U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION •HArispQRTATiON 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS -'"iW^ 0PERAT!0!^;3 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC 

FAA DOCKET NO [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNO FAA-201M122 

ERRATA 

The following correction is hereby made in the Dismissal Order of Administrative Law 

Judge, served January 5, 2011: 

READS SHOULD READ 

SO ORDERED. 

January 5, 2011 January 5, 2012 

Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2011-1122 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Jennifer E. Trock, Respondent's Counselor 

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 

2300 N Street, NW 

Washington, D.C.20037-1122 

TEL: 202-663-8000 

FAX: 202-663-8007 

Annjenet Chennault 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E4, AC 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 MeachamBlvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5071 

FAX; 817-222-5092/5946 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

. 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier use Die following address: Federal 

Aviation Adniinislralion. 600 Independence Avenue. S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W.I000, Washington. 

DC 2059!; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
S. 1931

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To provide that the United States Post Office and Courthouse building located

at 9 East Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated

as the ‘‘L. Clure Morton United States Post Office and Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF L. CLURE MORTON UNITED STATES

POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE.

The United States Post Office and Courthouse building located

at 9 East Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘L. Clure Morton United States Post Office

and Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States Post

Office and Courthouse building referred to in section 1 shall be

deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘L. Clure Morton United States

Post Office and Courthouse’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Erna Aletta Cox v. Kevin Stuart Cox

Appellate case number: 01-21-00521-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-28443

Trial court: 247th District Court of Harris County

Appellant Erna Aletta Cox filed a notice of appeal on September 29, 2021. On 

November 8, 2021, Appellant filed in this Court a “Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of

Court Costs or an Appeal Bond.” After consideration of documents filed in this proceeding, the 

Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that Appellant is 

allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of costs.1See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a), (c).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

 Acting individually 

Date: November 16, 2021

1

“Costs” are defined as filing fees charged by the Court of Appeals. TEX. R. APP. P.

20.1(a).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: February 3, 2014



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ David Gladstone    
| |  | David Gladstone        
| |  | Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), HollingsC. Renton, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of OnyxPharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best ofhis knowledge:
**1.** The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December31, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the“Annual Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and **2.** The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
Dated: March 12, 2004              /s/ Hollings C. Renton   Hollings C. Renton   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)   

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13(a)-14(b) ofthe Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350) has been provided to Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.and will be retained by Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
“This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.”
#### STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BY WALTER D. VAN RIPER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TRAFFIC TELEPHONE WORKERS’ FEDERATION, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS; NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 142 N. J. Eq. 785.

*Mr. Israel B. Greene*for the petitioners.

*Mr. Walter D. Van Riper*for the respondent State of New Jersey.

*Mr. Thomas G. Walker*and *Messrs. Pitney, Plardin & Ward,*for the respondent New Jersey Bell Telephone Company.

December 20, 1948.

Granted.
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 21.1

                    UNITED PAYORS & UNITED PROVIDERS, INC.
                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


     The Company directly or indirectly owns the following subsidiaries:
     National Health Services, Inc. (a Wisconsin corporation)
     National Health Services of Mississippi, Inc. (a Mississippi corporation)
     Healthcare Review Corporation (a Kentucky corporation)
     Healthcare Review Corporation of Missouri, Inc. (a Missouri corporation)
     Healthcare Review Corporation of New York, Inc. (a New York corporation)
     Medical Network, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
     NHS Coordinated Care, Inc. (a Nevada corporation)
     NHS Coordinated Care of Texas, Inc. (a Texas corporation)
     IM&I-NEWCO, Inc. (a Delaware corporation)
     America's Health Card Services, Inc. (an Iowa corporation)
     UP&UP, Inc. (a Maryland corporation)
     The Nation's Health Plan, Inc. (a Florida corporation)
     Health Plans of America, Inc. (a Maryland corporation)
     ProAmerica Managed Care, Inc. (a Texas corporation)
Exhibit 32.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
                            LEV PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
              FORM 10-QSB FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Financial Officer of Lev Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August  15, 2005
                                        /s/ Douglas J. Beck
                                        -------------------------
                                        Douglas J. Beck
                                        Chief Financial Officer