alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
I, Terry A. Klebe, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Cooper Industries, Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 4, 2004 /s/ Terry A. Klebe    Terry A. Klebe Senior Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

OP 21-0125

BOB BROWN, DOROTHY BRADLEY,

MAE NAN ELLINGSON, VERNON FINLEY,

and MONTANA LEAGUE OF WOMEN

VOTERS,

Petitioners,

v.

GREG GIANFORTE, Governor of the State of

Montana,

Respondent.

RLED

APR 1 4 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

The Montana State Legislature has filed a motion wherein it "respectfully requests

leave of the Court to intervene as a Respondent in this matter." The motion states the

Legislature seeks intervention because "it is specifically vested with the constitutional

authority to determine the process by which nominees are selected for gubernatorial

appointment to fill judicial vacancies, it has an interest in defending the constitutionality

of the laws it enacts, and the Montana State Senate has a constitutional role in confirming

judicial appointments."

Intervention in a proceeding pending before this Court is a discretionary

determination. M. R. App. P. 2(1)(f) (defining "Intervenor" as one "who, on motion, is

granted leave to enter a proceeding before this court, despite not being named originally as

a party"). The Legislature indicates that it will submit its summary response to the Petition

by the previously ordered deadline of April 14, 2021. As required by M. R. App. P 16(1),

the Legislature states it has contacted opposing counsel to determine whether opposing

counsel objects to the motion. The Legislature states it has obtained opposing counsel's

04/14/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0125
consent to the motion upon the Legislature's commitment "to abide by and comply with

all orders of the Court."

Upon these assertions by the Legislature, the Court concludes it can properly

intervene into this matter and that leave should be granted. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to intervene by the Montana State Legislature is

granted. The Intervenor shall file its response by April 14, 2021.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record in this

matter.

DATED this i*day of April, 2021.

Justices

2
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
  COMMUNITY
    BANCORP
    LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
  Name

Jurisdiction of Incorporation of OrganizationCommunity Bank of Nevada

NevadaCommunity Bank of Arizona

ArizonaCommunity Bancorp (NV) Statutory Trust II

ConnecticutCommunity Bancorp (NV) Statutory Trust III

Delaware
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: March 31, 2006



|       |  |                                                  
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /S/    C. PATRICK
MACHADO                        
|Name:  |  | C. Patrick Machado                               
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
[LETTERHEAD OF McDONNELL BOEHNEN HULBERT & BERGHOFF]


                                                                  March 27, 1998
Daniel Harrington
Diatide, Inc.
Nine Delta Drive
Londonderry, NH 03053

     Re:  U.S. Patent No. 5,670,133, Zamora
          ---------------------------------

Dear Mr. Harrington:

At John McDonnell's request, I am authorizing Diatide to reference the opinion
dated March 3, 1998 regarding validity of US Patent No. 5,670,113 issued
September 23, 1997 to Zamora and reference to our firm under the captions
"Business -- Patents, Trade Secrets and Licenses" in Diatide Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 1997.


Very truly yours,

/s/ BRADLEY J. HULBERT

Bradley J. Hulbert
Report of Independent Public Accountants


To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards, the consolidated
financial statements of Household Finance
Corporation (the "Company") and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and have issued our report
thereon dated January 23, 1997.  We have not
audited any financial statements of the Company as
of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 31, 1996, or performed any audit
procedures subsequent to the date of our report on
those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our
attention that caused us to believe that the
Company was not in compliance with any of the
terms, covenants, provisions, or conditions of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"),
dated May 1, 1996, in conjunction with the
Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed
Certificates Series 1996-1 insofar as they relate
to accounting matters.  It should be noted,
however, that our audit was not directed primarily
toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and
evaluation of the Company's system of internal
accounting controls over the Company's home equity
loan portfolio, including those loans serviced
under the Agreement to the extent we considered
necessary to evaluate the system as required by
generally accepted auditing standards.  In
accordance with these standards, the purpose of
our study and evaluation, which included obtaining
an understanding of the accounting systems, was to
determine the nature, timing and extent of the
auditing procedures necessary for expressing an
opinion on the financial statements.  Our study
and evaluation also took into consideration
certain of the criteria and audit requirements in
the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised
Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development.  However, certain
procedures included in the audit guide are not
applicable to the home equity loans being serviced
for the Trustee, and therefore, were not
performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in
records relating to home equity loans serviced for
the Trustee that, in our opinion, Section 3.10 of
the Agreement required us to report.

This report is intended solely for the information
and use of the Board of Directors and management
of the Company and should not be used for any
other purpose.



Chicago, Illinois
January 23,  1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          61,381
<SECURITIES>                                     8,102
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                       796
<INVENTORY>                                      3,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,740
<PP&E>                                           2,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,969
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               15
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,969
<SALES>                                         44,151
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,151
<CGS>                                           16,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (2,066)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,860)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.60)


</TABLE>
Order entered November 30, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00991-CV

PATRICK DAUGHERTY, Appellant

V.

SCOTT BYRON ELLINGTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-22-00304

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s November 29, 2022 first unopposed motion 

for a twenty-nine day extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion 

and ORDER the brief be filed no later than January 6, 2023.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 11.1

                   STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         1997                    1996               1995
                                              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>                     <C>                      <C>
Net income (loss)                                       $7,246,457              ($858,116)               ($6,036,335)

                                              =============================================================================

Weighted average common shares
outstanding                                              9,614,278               5,142,736                 1,622,283


                                              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                         9,614,278               5,142,736                 1,622,283
                                              =============================================================================

Basic income (loss) per share                              $0.75                  ($0.17)                    ($3.72)
                                              =============================================================================

Dilutive effect of options and warrants
outstanding under treasury stock method                  1,280,337                      --                       --
                                              -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                        10,894,615              5,142,736                  1,622,283
                                              =============================================================================

Diluted income (loss) per share                         $0.67                     ($0.17)                   ($3.72)
                                              =============================================================================

</TABLE>


                                       E-1
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                         LSB CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul A. Miller, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March
         31, 2003 and results of operations of the Company for the three months
         ended March 31, 2003.

                                  /s/ Paul A. Miller
                                  --------------------------------
                                  Paul A. Miller
                                  President and
                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                  May 9, 2003

                                       23
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                   List of Subsidiaries of the Registrants

                   Charter Communications Southeast, L.P.

     1.   Charter Communications Southeast, L.P.
     2.   Charter Communications Southeast Capital Corporation
     3.   CCP One, Inc.
     4.   Charter Communications, L.P.
     5.   CCP II, Inc.
     6.   Charter Communications II, L.P.
     7.   CCP III, Inc.
     8.   Charter Communications III, L.P.
     9.   Peachtree Cable TV, Inc.

All of the above-named subsidiaries were incorporated or organized under the
laws of the State of Delaware, except for Peachtree Cable TV, Inc., which was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.

Charter Communications Southeast Capital Corporation does not have any
subsidiaries.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,745
<PP&E>                                         366,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 349,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,268
<BONDS>                                        232,740
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,091
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,165
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,142
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Digital Solutions, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William J.
Delgado, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                              /S/ WILLIAM J. DELGADO
                              -----------------------
                              William J. Delgado
                              Chief Executive Officer
November 22, 2004
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0543

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN GUY ZENO SHAWN WOLF MASON,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until December 30, 2022, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

November 21 2022

11/21/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0543
### COMPILATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS AND NEW HAMPSHIRE'S RESPONSE THERETO 40 CFRPart 51, Appendix V, 2.1(h)Enclosure EPA COMMENTS ONJANUARY 2005 PROPOSED REVISIONS TONEW HAMPSHIRE'S SOLVENT METAL CLEANING RULE 1
. In Env-A 1204.43(b), DES is revising the rule to include an exemption for open top vapor degreasers with an open top area less than 1 .0 square meters
. EPAagrees that it is reasonable to exempt these units fromthe control equipment requirements ofthe rule, however, they should continue to be subject to the rule's work practice standards (i .e., Env-A 1204.45(d))

. Therefore, EPA recommends that Env-A 1204.43(b) be revised to read as follows: "An open top vapor degreaser with an open top area less than 1 .0 square meter (m) (10.8 square feet (ft)) shall be exempt fromEnv-A 1204.45 (a), (b), and (c) ." 2
. The proposed revisions include a new low vapor pressure requirement for cold cleaning solvents, in accordance with the OTCmodel rule on solvent cleaning
. In order to take into account some ofthe concerns industry has previously raised regarding such a requirement, New Hampshire may want to consider allowing certain specified exemptions fromthis requirement, similar to the exemptions that have been adopted by New York and Maine

. For example, New Hampshire could add a new paragraph (d) .to Env-A 1204.44, and add a new definition of "special and extreme solvent metal cleaning" to Env-A 1204.03, as follows:

" (d) The requirements of Env-A1204.44(a)(2)(h) and Env-1204 44(b) shall not apply to cold cleaning machines: (1) used in special and extreme solvent metal cleanin~~ (2) for which the owner or operator has received Department approval ofa demonstration that compliance with the requirement ofa solvent with a vapor pressure of 1 .0 mm

Hg, or less at 20°C will result in unsafe operating conditions: or (3) that are located in a permanent total enclosure having control equinment that is designed and operated with an overall VOCremoval efficiency of 90 percent or greater
. "

" Special and extreme solvent metal cleaning means the use ofcold cleaning machines: (a) to clean metal parts in the manufacturing and rework ofelectronic parts assemblies, boxes, wiring harnesses sensors and connectors used in aerospace service: (b) to clean metal parts used in the manufacturing ofozone nitrous oxide fluorine, chlorine, bromine, halogenated compounds or oxygen in concentrations greater than 23 percent : or(c) to clean metal parts exposed to ozone nitrous oxide fluorine, chlorine bromine halogenated compounds or oxygen in concentrations greater than 23 percent
."