alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counter-defendant, Appellee, v. Leo P. BOURGAULT, Cheryl Bourgault, Defendants-Counter-claimants, Appellants.

No. 92-8068.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 27, 1993.

Ervin H. Gerson, Stevens & Gerson, Atlanta, GA, for defendants-counter-claimants, appellants.

Alan Terry Sorrells, Carter & Ansley, Christopher N. Shuman, Atlanta, GA, for plaintiff-counter-defendant, appellee.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On December 10, 1992, we issued an opinion in this case in which we certified to the Georgia Supreme Court the issue of the application of O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11 to insurance policies covering vehicles not principally garaged or used in Georgia. 979 F.2d 187. The Supreme Court of Georgia has responded to our request in its opinion of *Arnica Mutual Ins. Co. v. Bourgault,*263 Ga. 157, 429 S.E.2d 908 (1993). That court answered our question in the negative, holding that O.C.G.A. § 33-7-11 does not invalidate an exclusion in an insurance policy covering a vehicle principally garaged and used outside of Georgia.

The Supreme Court of Georgia’s decision is consistent with the reasoning of the district court. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03056**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 03056\03056_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03056\03056_Completeness_Checklist.XLS EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03056\03056_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

03056\Certification Statement Plant ID_03056.pdf Plant certification statement

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
Exhibit 99.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of PFS Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

                                   /s/Mel E. Green
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Name: Mel E. Green
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PFS Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by PFS Bancorp, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00215

- CR
Ronald Douglas Nevels v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 09

- CR

- 1906

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 20, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1753 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1753

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the authority of the 
 Secretary of Veterans Affairs to suspend a special pay agreement for 
     physicians and dentists who enter residency training programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1996

Mr. Simpson (by request) introduced the following bill; which was read 
        twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the authority of the 
 Secretary of Veterans Affairs to suspend a special pay agreement for 
     physicians and dentists who enter residency training programs.

    Be in enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That except as 
otherwise expressly provided, whenever in this Act an amendment is 
expressed in terms of an amendment to a section or other provision, the 
reference shall be considered to be made to a section or other 
provision of title 38, United States Code.
    Sec. 2. Subsection 7432(b)(2) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``A'' after ``(2)'' before ``The'', and
            (2) adding a new subsection to read as follows:
                    ``(B) The Secretary may, in the case of a physician 
                or dentist who enters a residency training program, 
                suspend the special pay agreement. When the physician 
                or dentist completes, withdraws from or is no longer a 
                participant in the program, the special pay agreement 
                shall be reinstated. During such suspension the 
                physician or dentist shall not be subject to the refund 
                requirement of paragraph 1.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003
    /s/ Joseph SciroccoJoseph SciroccoChief Financial OfficerSeptember 10, 2007
December 1 2009
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 3, 2016



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Nicole Schaltenbrand             
|Nicole Schaltenbrand                 
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
**Exhibit    15.1** **Report of    Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**     To the Board of Directors and    Stockholders of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International:     We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated condensed balance    sheet of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International and its    subsidiaries as of March 31, 2008, and the related    consolidated condensed statements of operations, the    consolidated condensed statements of comprehensive income and    the consolidated condensed statement of cash flows for each of    the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.    These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the    Company’s management.     We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A    review of interim financial information consists principally of    applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons    responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is    substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in    accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting    Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the    expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements    taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.     Based on our review, we are not aware of any material    modifications that should be made to the accompanying    consolidated condensed interim financial statements for them to    be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted    in the United States of America.     We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the    consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, and the    related consolidated statements of operations, of    stockholders’ equity, and of cash flows for the year then    ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated    March 17, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on    those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the    information set forth in the accompanying consolidated condensed    balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, is fairly stated in    all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance    sheet from which it has been derived.      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP     Orange County, California
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 

THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 2003 DIRECTORS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The Progressive Corporation
2003 Directors Equity Incentive Plan, as previously amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows: 
 1.
Section 12 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the following is substituted in its place: 

“SECTION 12 Term of Plan. 

No Award shall be granted pursuant to the Plan on or after January 31, 2018, but Awards granted prior to such date
may extend beyond such date.” 
 2. Section 6(c) of the Plan, entitled “Buyout Provisions,” is hereby deleted
in its entirety. 
 3. In Section 7 of the Plan: 

a. Section 7(b), entitled “Definition of Change in Control,” is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the
following is substituted in its place: 
 “(b) Definition of Change in Control. For purposes of
Section 7(a), a “Change in Control” means a change in the ownership of the Company, a change in the effective control of the Company, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the Company’s assets, each as defined
in, and determined in accordance with, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.” 
 b.
Section 7(c), entitled “Definition of Potential Change in Control,” is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following is substituted in its place: 

“(c) Intentionally omitted.” 
 In addition, all references to “Potential Change in Control” in Sections 7(a) and 7(d), and the defined term “Potential Change in Control” in Section 1(c), are hereby deleted from
the Plan. 
 4. This Amendment is subject to approval by the holders of The Progressive Corporation’s Common Shares, $1.00
par value, in accordance with the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. If shareholders do not approve this Amendment at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in April 2012, this Amendment shall automatically terminate and be of no further force
or effect. 
 This Amendment will be effective as of January 27, 2012. 

 

			
	
		
		 	/s/ Charles E. Jarrett
		 	 Charles E. Jarrett

Secretary
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 128 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Senate]
[Pages S6532-S6533]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                100TH ANNIVERSARY OF CATHOLIC CHARITIES

  Mr. PORTMAN. Mr. President, I rise today to recognize the 100th 
anniversary of Cleveland Catholic Charities and its mission to serve 
people in need throughout the Catholic Diocese of Cleveland.
  Catholic Charities was established in Cleveland in 1912 under the 
direction of Bishop John Farrelly during a time when there were few 
organized charities in the United States. It was founded in response to 
challenging economic conditions that existed for the poor and orphaned 
of the day. Throughout the organization's 100-year history, its work, 
programs and family centers have touched the lives of many people 
throughout northeast Ohio.
  Over the years, Catholic Charities' leaders, employees, supporters 
and volunteers have cared for their neighbors and provided guidance to 
address the social needs of our community. Their charitable mission is 
inspirational and their generous work has had great impact, helping 
millions of people. Their efforts provide meals, shelter, emergency 
assistance, counseling services, training and employment for many 
throughout the 8 northeast Ohio counties in the diocese.
  On this occasion I would like to congratulate Bishop Richard Lennon,

[[Page S6533]]

Cleveland Catholic Charities, and the Catholic community and thank them 
for their leadership, kindness, commitment and collective effort to 
serve the community and improve the lives of those in need. It is a 
privilege to recognize this centennial anniversary, and wish Cleveland 
Catholic Charities all the best for the future.

                          ____________________
```
AMENDMENT TO THE ARBITRATION PROVISIONS
OF THE FERRLECIT AGREEMENTS
  R&D Ferrlecit Capital Resources, Inc.
 R&D Ferrlecit
   A.
Nattermann & CIE. GmbH
 A. Nattermann
  May & Baker Limited, trading as sanofi-aventis
 sanofi-aventis (UK)
  R&D Ferrlecit, A. Nattermann, sanofi-aventis (UK) Parties
 1




---



##### 



WHEREAS, Makoff R&D RPR GmbH Distribution Agreement
 WHEREAS, Trademark Agreement
 WHEREAS, RPR Ltd. Manufacturing and Supply Agreement Ferrlecit Agreements
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
  (a)
    
    Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or in relation to this
Agreement, including the validity, invalidity, breach or termination thereof,
shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the Swiss Rules of
International Arbitration of the Swiss Chambers of Commerce (the
Rules) in force on the date when the Notice of Arbitration is submitted in
accordance with these Rules.(b)
    
    The number of arbitrators shall be three.
 2




---



##### 



(c)
    
    The seat of the arbitration shall be in Zurich, Switzerland.(d)
    
    The arbitral proceedings shall be conducted in English; and(e)
    
    With respect to any arbitral proceedings commenced hereunder on
or before September 1, 2008:
 1.
    
    The arbitral proceedings shall be conducted in accordance with the Expedited Procedure in Article 42(1) of the Rules; and2.
    
    The Notice of Arbitration shall include Claimants designation of an arbitrator. Respondents time to submit its Answer to the Notice of
Arbitration is 15 days from receipt of the Notice of Arbitration, and
its Answer shall include its designation of an arbitrator. The two
party-designated arbitrators shall designate, within 15 days from
the confirmation of the second arbitrator, the third arbitrator who
shall act as the presiding arbitrator of the arbitral tribunal.
     Corona, California, August 12, 2008
Place / DateR&D Ferrlecit Capital Resources, Inc.:/s/ David A. BuchenName:
    David A. BuchenFunction:
    Secretary 3




---



##### 



Koln, August 25, 2008
Place / DateA. Nattermann & CIE, GmbH:/s/ Hildegard SchleinitzName:
    Hildegard SchleinitzFunction:
    General ManagerA. Nattermann & CIE, GmbH:/s/ O. StuttgenName:
    O. StuttgenFunction:
    Chief Financial OfficerMay & Baker Limited, trading as
sanofi-aventis:/s/ Nigel BrooksbyName:
    Nigel BrooksbyFunction:
    Managing DirectorMay & Baker Limited, trading as
sanofi-aventis:/s/ Michael McClellanName:
    Michael McClellanFunction:
    Chief Financial Officer 4
Driving Green Energy Movement

• Energy Self-Reliance 

• California Global Warming Solution Act- AB32

• Law which sets California Green House Gas (GHG) emission standards

for the next 50 years. 

• To 1990 levels by 2025 

• To be reduced 80% below 1990 levels by 2050

• Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS): A regulation that requires the 

increased production of energy from renewable energy sources.

• 20% by 2010

• 33% by 2020
Land Use

3

• Imperial County extends over 4,597 square miles. 

• Largest land owner is the Federal government (49.6%)

• 22.7% is private land in the desert/mountains 

• 18.1% is irrigated agricultural land

• Ag Land Conversion Issue 
comparison
discussion
Solar PV Energy

• 18 – # of Projects

• 2,050 – Total MW

• $10 B – Capital Investment 
north
south
Geothermal Energy

*Ormat Brawley North plant, August 2008

• 10 - # of New Projects

• 515 - Total MW

• $3 B – Capital Investment

• 2nd largest geothermal energy producing county in the nation
KGRA’s in Imperial County
Wind Energy

• 2 - # of Projects

• 400 - Total MW

• 300 - Construction Jobs

• 75 - Operations & Maintenance Jobs

• $1Billion + in Capital Investment
Challenges

• Transmission

• Financing

• Water/Salton Sea

• Land Use

• Labor Issues

• Environmental/Cultural Resources 
13
Project Summary

• 117-mile electric transmission 

line, capable of delivering 1,000 megawatts 

of clean, reliable energy

• Project submitted in August 2005

• Approved by the CPUC and US BLM

• Final approval by USFS – July 2010

• $1.883 billion project

• 2010 – Construction start

• Mid 2012 – In-service date

14
iid
Questions
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 178

AN ACT

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to extend the authorization for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CFTC Reauthorization

5 Act of 1995’’.
2

S 178 ES

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

2 Section 12(d) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7

3 U.S.C. 16(d)) is amended to read as follows:

4 ‘‘(d) There are authorized to be appropriated such

5 sums as are necessary to carry out this Act for each of

6 fiscal years 1995 through 2000.’’.

Passed the Senate February 10 (legislative day,

January 30), 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 178

AN ACT

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to extend

Trading Commission, and for other purposes.the authorization for the Commodity Futures
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY LOZANO SOLIS,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Arizona

Department of Corrections; et al.

,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 17140

D.C. No. 2:17

- cv

- 02378

- ROS

- CDB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2022 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Anthony Lozano Solis appeals pro se from the district

court ’ s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 action alleging deliberate

indifference to his safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We

affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 24 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 17140

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Sol is failed

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants were

deliberately indifferent to his safety. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 837

(1994) (a prison official is deliberately indifferent only if he or she “knows of and

disr egards an excessive risk to inmate health or safety; the official must both be

aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of

serious harm exists, and he [or she] must also draw the inference”).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Solis’s motion to

compel because the denial did not result in actual or substantial prejudice. See

Hallett v. Morgan , 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002) (setting forth standard of

review and holding a district court’s “ decision to deny discovery will not be

disturbed except upon the clearest showing that denial of discovery results in

actual and substantial prejudice to the complaining litigant ”).

Solis’s motion for an in camera review of court logs, set forth in his reply

brief, is denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1992

To recognize the significance of the AIDS Memorial Grove, located in Golden

Gate Park in San Francisco, California, and to direct the Secretary

of the Interior to designate the AIDS Memorial Grove as a national

memorial.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 1996

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To recognize the significance of the AIDS Memorial Grove,

located in Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, California, and to direct the Secretary of the Interior to designate the AIDS Memorial Grove as a national memorial.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘AIDS Memorial Grove

5 Act of 1996’’.
2

S 1992 IS

1 SEC. 2. RECOGNITION AND DESIGNATION OF THE AIDS ME2 MORIAL GROVE AS NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

3 (a) RECOGNITION OF SIGNIFICANCE OF THE AIDS

4 MEMORIAL GROVE.—The Congress hereby recognizes the

5 significance of the AIDS Memorial Grove, located in Gold6 en Gate Park in San Francisco, California, as a memo7 rial—

8 (1) dedicated to individuals who have died as a

9 result of acquired immune deficiency syndrome; and

10 (2) in support of individuals who are living with

11 acquired immune deficiency syndrome and their

12 loved ones and caregivers.

13 (b) DESIGNATION AS NATIONAL MEMORIAL.—Not

14 later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act,

15 the Secretary of the Interior shall designate the AIDS Me16 morial Grove as a national memorial.

Æ