alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023

- 0615

_____________________________

J AMIE B OWDEN ,
Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF B USINESS AND P ROFESSIONAL R EGULATION ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for the Second Judicial Circuit, Leon County

. Angela C. Dempsey , Judge

.

December 29, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.

O STERHAUS , C.J., and R OBERTS and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Marie A. Mattox and Ashley N. Richardson of Marie A. Mattox, P.A., Tallahassee

, for Appellant.

Jamie Ito of Ito Law, PLLC, Tallahassee; Brooke Elizabeth Adams and Joseph Y. Whealdon III

, Department of Business and Professional Regulation, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 12

                         AVCO FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

                  STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NUMBER OF TIMES
                              FIXED CHARGES EARNED

                      NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996
                             (Thousands of dollars)


<TABLE>
<S>                                                               <C>
Income
   Income before income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $223,297
                                                                   --------

   Fixed charges to be added back to income -

      Interest and debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     320,538
      Rentals (one-third of all rent and related costs
        charged to income)  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      11,116
                                                                   --------

          Total fixed charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .     331,654
                                                                   --------

Income before income taxes and fixed charges  . . . . . . . . .    $554,951
                                                                   ========

Ratio
  Number of times fixed charges covered by income
    before income taxes and fixed charges . . . . . . . . . . .         1.7
                                                                        ===
</TABLE>





                                      S-1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-1655
STEPHEN J. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusVIRGINIA WATER PROJECT, INCORPORATED, a Virginia Corporation, Defendant - Appellee.
No. 96-1682
STEPHEN J. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellee, versusVIRGINIA WATER PROJECT, INCORPORATED, a Virginia Corporation, Defendant - Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-507-R)2 Argued: January 28, 1997 Decided: March 11, 1997 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and HILTON, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: Janet R. Cooper, LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM S. THOMPSON, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Jonathan Martin Rogers, JONATHAN ROGERS, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Rena Gladys Berry, Roanoke, Virginia; John L. Taylor, TAYLOR & JACKSON, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Charles D. Fox, III, FOX & MILLS, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM:Steven J. Jones appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment to Virginia Water Project, Inc. (VWP) on his claims of race and sex discrimination in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII). VWP crossappeals an order of the district c ourt denying its motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. After consideration of the parties' briefs, the record, and the oral arguments of counsel, we conclude that the district court correctly granted summary judgment to VWP on the discrimination claims. We further conclude that the district court's denial ofVWP's motion for sanctions was not an abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Virginia Water Project, Inc. , No. 94-507-R (W.D. Va. 1996).

AFFIRMED
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00555

- CR

David Espinoza v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 22FC

- 0047F(S1)

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered th is cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 25, 2024
II

Calendar No. 482

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1828

[Report No. 104–307]

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of

documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel TOP GUN.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 4, 1996

Mr. HEFLIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

JUNE 27, 1996

Reported by Mr. PRESSLER, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel TOP GUN.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
2

S 1828 RS

1 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

2 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the

3 coastwise trade for the vessel TOP GUN (United States

4 official number 623642).

Calendar No. 482

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1828

[Report No. 104–307]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

wise trade endorsement for the vessel TOP GUN.issue a certificate of documentation and coastJUNE 27, 1996

Reported without amendment
1/2 

EASA AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE 

AD No : 2008-0033 

Date: 19 February 2008

No person may operate an aircraft to which an Airworthiness Directive applies, except in accordance with the 

requirements of that Airworthiness Directive unless otherwise agree with the Authority of the State of Registry. 

Type Approval Holder’s Name: 

Dowty Propellers 

Type/Model designation(s): 

R354, R375, R389 and R390 propellers 

TCDS: United Kingdom Numbers 103, 109, 112 and 113. 

Foreign AD No.: Not applicable 

Supersedure: None 

ATA 61 Propellers – Blade Outer Sleeve - Inspection 

Manufacturer(s): Dowty Propellers (part of GE Aviation Systems) 

Applicability: Models R354/4-123-F/13, R354/4-123-F/20, R375/4-123-F/21, R389/4-123-F/25, 

R389/4-123-F/26 and R390/4-123-F/27 propellers, all serial numbers. 

These propellers are known to be installed on Saab SF340A and 340B aircraft. 

Reason: A number of propeller blade outer sleeves have been found with cracks since 

1996. Testing has shown that blade retention integrity is not affected by this 

cracking. However, this condition, if not detected and corrected, can lead to 

blade counterweight release, possibly resulting in damage to the aircraft and 

injury to occupants or persons on the ground. 

For the reason stated above, this AD requires the inspection of the blade outer 

sleeves and replacement of propeller blades where the outer sleeve is found to 

have crack indications. 

Effective Date: 04 March 2008 

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless previously accomplished: 

(1) At the next scheduled 1 600 Flight Hours (FH) aircraft check after the 

effective date of this AD, or after any blade accumulates 15 000 FH time in 

service, whichever occurs later, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1 

600 FH, inspect the blade outer sleeves for cracks; 

(2) When during any inspection as required by paragraph (1) of this AD, visual 

indication of a crack on the outer sleeve is found, before next flight, replace 

the affected propeller blade with an airworthy unit; 

(3) Replacement of the blade does not constitute terminating action for the 

inspection requirements of this AD. 
2/2 

Ref. Publications: Dowty Propellers Alert Service Bulletin No. SF340-61-A106. 

The use of later approved revisions of this document is acceptable for 

compliance with the requirements of this AD. 

Remarks: 1. If requested and appropriately substantiated, EASA can accept Alternative 

methods of Compliance for this AD. 

2. This AD has been published as PAD 08-011 on 18 January 2008 for 

consultation until 15 February 2008. No comments were received during the 

consultation period. 

3. Enquiries regarding this AD should be addressed to the AD Focal Point, 

Certification Directorate, EASA – E-mail: ADs@easa.europa.eu 

4. For any questions concerning the technical content of the requirements in 

this AD, please contact: 

Dowty Propellers, Anson Business Park, Cheltenham Road East, 

Gloucester GL2 9QN, United Kingdom; 

Telephone: +44 (0) 1452 716067; Fax +44 (0) 1452 716001; 

E-mail Mike.Towkan@ge.com
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                       SUBSIDIARIES OF WFS FINANCIAL INC
 
WFS Financial Auto Loans, Inc., a California corporation
 
WFS Financial Auto Loans 2, Inc., a California corporation
 
WFS Investments, Inc., a California corporation
 
                                      F-21
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1689

To provide regulatory fairness for crude oil producers, and to prohibit fee

increases under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act without

the approval of Congress.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 19, 1996

Mr. GRAMM (for himself and Mrs. HUTCHISON) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To provide regulatory fairness for crude oil producers, and

to prohibit fee increases under the Hazardous Materials

Transportation Act without the approval of Congress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Crude Oil Transpor5 tation Fairness Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. REGULATORY FAIRNESS FOR CRUDE OIL PRODUC7 ERS.

8 Section 5108(a) of title 49, United States Code, is

9 amended by adding at the end the following:
2

S 1689 IS

1 ‘‘(5)(A) Notwithstanding any other provision of law,

2 a person who offers crude oil or condensates for transport

3 in commerce shall not be required to file a registration

4 statement or pay a fee otherwise required under this sec5 tion if that person transfers title to the crude oil or con6 densates to a transporter at the time that the crude oil

7 or condensates are initially transported in commerce from

8 a storage location by the transporter.

9 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to any person

10 who transports crude oil in commerce in a quantity that

11 is subject to the requirements of this section.’’.

12 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION OF FEE INCREASES WITHOUT THE

13 APPROVAL OF CONGRESS.

14 Section 5108(g)(2)(A) of title 49, United States

15 Code, is amended in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘at

16 least $250 but not more than $5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘not

17 more than $250’’.

Æ
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1612

AN ACT

To broaden the scope of certain firearms offenses, and for

other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1612 ES

1 SECTION 1. FIREARMS OFFENSES.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 924(c)(1) and 929(a)(1)

3 of title 18, United States Code, are each amended by strik4 ing ‘‘uses or carries’’ and inserting ‘‘possesses’’.

5 (b) AMENDMENT OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to its authority

7 under section 994 of title 28, United States Code,

8 the United States Sentencing Commission shall re9 view and, if appropriate, amend the Federal Sen10 tencing Guidelines and the policy statements of the

11 Commission to provide an appropriate sentence en12 hancement with respect to any defendant who dis13 charges a firearm during or in relation to any crime

14 of violence or any drug trafficking crime.

15 (2) CONSISTENCY.—In carrying out this sub16 section, the United States Sentencing Commission

17 shall—

18 (A) ensure that there is reasonable consist19 ency with other Federal Sentencing Guidelines;

20 (B) avoid duplicative punishment for sub21 stantially the same offense; and

22 (C) take into account any mitigating cir23 cumstances that might justify an exception to

24 any amendment made under paragraph (1).

25 (3) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub26 section, the terms ‘‘crime of violence’’ and ‘‘drug
3

S 1612 ES

1 trafficking crime’’ have the same meanings as in sec2 tion 924(c) of title 18, United States Code.

Passed the Senate October 3, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1612

AN ACT

To broaden the scope of certain firearms offenses,

and for other purposes.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2024)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 5419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01755]



[[Page 5417]]

Vol. 89

Friday,

No. 18

January 26, 2024

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Memorandum of December 27, 2023--Delegation of Authority Under Section 
614(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 89 , No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2024 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 5419]]

                Memorandum of December 27, 2023

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 614(a)(1) 
                of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State the authority under section 
                614(a)(1) of the FAA to determine whether it is 
                important to the security interests of the United 
                States to furnish up to $20 million in assistance to 
                Ukraine without regard to any provision of law within 
                the purview of section 614(a)(1) of the FAA.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 27, 2023

[FR Doc. 2024-01755
Filed 1-25-24; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Entertainment
Holdings,  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley Weiner, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/Stanley
Weiner


Stanley
Weiner


Chief
Financial Officer





November
19, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned
President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                         |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ JAMES J. BAUMBERGER
|                      |  |  |  | Name:                   |  | James J. Baumberger                  
|                      |  |  |  | Title:                  |  | President and chief executive officer
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                      Organized Under Laws Of  Ownership
----                     ------------------------- ---------
<S>                      <C>                       <C>
DuPont Dai Nippon
 Engineering             Delaware                    50.0%

DuPont Photomasks
 Company Limited,
 Shanghai                Peoples Republic of China   71.5%

DuPont Photomasks
 Delaware, Inc.          Delaware                   100.0%

DuPont Photomasks
 Foreign Sales
 Corporation             Barbados                   100.0%

DuPont Photomasks
 (France) S.A.           France                     100.0%

DuPont Photomasks GmbH   Germany                    100.0%

DuPont Photomasks Korea
 Limited                 Republic of Korea          100.0%

DPI Reticle Technology
 Center, LLC             Delaware                    25.0%

DuPont Photomasks Japan
 Company, Limited        Japan                      100.0%

DuPont Photomasks
 Singapore Pte Limited   Singapore                  100.0%

DuPont Photomasks
 Taiwan, Limited         Republic of China           48.4%

Orion Operating
 Corporation             Delaware                   100.0%

DPI Holdings, Inc.       Delaware                   100.0%
</TABLE>
Exhibit
        31
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I,
        Atsushi Maki, certify that:
 
 1.  
         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Amanasu
        Environment Corporation;
 
 2.  
         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
        of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
        circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect
        to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
        statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
        present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
        and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
        this
        quarterly report;
 
 4.  
         I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
        procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
        the
        registrant and we have:
 
 a)  
         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
        ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
        particularly during the period in which this report is being
        prepared;
 
 b)  
         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
        of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
        by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  
         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
        fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
        materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
        and
 
 5.  
         I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s
        auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons
        performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)  
         All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
        likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
        summarize and report financial data; and
 
 b)  
         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
        over
        financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
                  May 22, 2006/s/
                  Atsushi MakiAtsushi
                  MakiCEO,
                  CFO, CAO