alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 1 **Regulatory Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 6823 Directorate Identifier: 2015

-NE

- 38

- AD
Add the work hours, parts cost, and number o f U.S. registered products to the table below. When you are finished, click on the “Update Fields” button to automaticall y fill in the totals. 

### Updat e Field s

**Estimated Costs:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$85 /h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet
Inspection 7 $ 595.00 $ 595.00 1 $ 595.00 Parts $ 0.00 

### 780,000 $ 0.00 $ $780,000 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 The known number of products in compliance: 

### Number Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 780,595 Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### Warranty

**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

Inspection $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

### 2 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 **Special considerations for Economic Analysis** (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) : **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * ☐ NO ☒

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * ☐ NO ☒

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answe r. YES ☐ NO ☒ Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * ☐ NO ☒
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Mark R. Goldston, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of United Online, Inc.(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

(a)   theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 9, 2006

| /s/ MARK  R. GOLDSTON                   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|
| Mark R. Goldston                        |
| *Chairman and Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

 

1

----
Assignment and Assumption



 Exhibit 10.40 
 ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF RIGHTS UNDER 
 SHOPPING CENTER PURCHASE
AGREEMENT 
 For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, PHILLIPS
EDISON GROUP LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (“Assignor”), hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to CURETON STATION LLC (“Assignee”), all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest as Purchaser in and to that certain
Purchase Contract dated November 28, 2011, as same may have been or may be amended, including any addendum thereto (“Agreement”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Seller”), as Seller, with respect to the land and
improvements thereon located in Waxhaw, North Carolina, more particularly described in the Agreement, including, but not limited to, its right, title and interest in and to the Deposit (as defined in the Agreement). 

 

							
	Dated: December 29, 2011	 		 	 PHILLIPS EDISON GROUP, LLC,
 an Ohio limited liability company

				
		 		 	By:	 	 PHILLIPS EDISON LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP,

		 		 		 	a Delaware limited partnership,
		 		 		 	Managing Member
				
		 		 	By:	 	PHILLIPS EDISON & COMPANY, INC.,
		 		 		 	a Maryland corporation, General Partner
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Robert F. Myers

		 		 		 	Robert F. Myers, Chief Operating Officer

 The undersigned, Assignee, hereby accepts the foregoing assignment and hereby assumes and agrees to
perform all of Assignor’s obligations under the Agreement and hereby releases, indemnifies and holds Assignor harmless from any loss, cost, liability or expense which may be suffered by Assignor in connection with such Agreement, except for any
such loss, cost, liability or expense resulting from the acts of Assignor in connection with the Agreement taken prior to the date of this Assignment without the applicable authorization or consent of the undersigned. 

 

							
	Dated: December 29, 2011	 		 	 CURETON STATION LLC,

A Delaware limited liability company

				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ R. Mark Addy

		 		 		 	R. Mark Addy, President
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 8, 2017



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Nicole Schaltenbrand             
|Nicole Schaltenbrand                 
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT May 23, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NO T PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 07- 1464 7
D. C. Docket N o. 02-01597 CV -BE -S FRANK T. COLUMBIA, for the use and benefit of United States of Am erica , Pl ai nti ff -Appe llant,
ve rs us MEDICAL CENTER EAST, INC., d.b .a. East ern Heal th Sy st em , Inc ., De fendant-Appellee.

Appeal f rom the United State s District Court f o r t h e N o rt h e rn D i s t r i c to f

A l ab a ma (M ay 2 3, 200 8) Be fo re D U BI N A a nd B A RKE T T , Ci rc uit Jud ge s, and S CH L E SI N G E R* , D istri ct Judg e.

____ ____ ____ ____ ___ *Honora ble Har vey E. Schlesing er, United States District J udg e for the Middle District of Florida , sitti ng by

desig nation.2

PE R CU RIA M: Ap p el l an tFr an kT. C o l u m b i a ( “ Co l u m

b i a” ) ap p ea l s t h e d i s tri ct co u rt ’s

or de r gr an ti ng pa rti al su m m ary jud gm en t t o app el le e Me di cal Cen te r Eas t, In c., (“ MCE”) , on Co lu m

bi a’s Fal se Cla im s Act cla im s. Th e ap pe al pre se nt s t wo iss ue s: (1 ) w he the r the dis tr ic t c ourt e rr ed in lim iti ng C olu m

bia ’ s c la im s to the y ears in w hich he was e m ploy ed at MCE ; and (2) w hether the district court err ed in gra nt in g s umm ary jud gm en t t o M CE.

“ W e re view a grant of sum m ary j udgm ent by

a district de novo.” Shuf ord v. F ide lit y Na t. P rope rty& Ca s. I

ns. Co

. , 508 F
. 3d 1 337, 134 1 ( 11th C ir c. 200 7) (citations om itted). “ W e apply the sam e legal standards that boun d the district

co urt and v ie w a ll fa ct s and r ea sona ble inf er en ce s inthe li ght

m ost f av or ab le to the nonm ovin g party .” Id . (ci ta ti on s o m it te d)

. W e rev ie w a di st ric t co ur t’s d is co ve ry de ci si on s fo r ab us e o f di sc ret io n. Burger King Corp. v. W

eaver , 16 9 F .3d 13 10 , 13 15 (11 th Cir . 19 99 ). A ft er r ev ie w ing the r ec or d, r ea din g th e pa rt ie s br ie fs , a nd h av ing the be ne fi t of or al a rg um en t, w e af

fi rm the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of sum m ar y j udgm en t i n favor of MC E bec ause there w as no evidence before the district court that MCE fr au dul en tly

bil le d, or oth er w ise im pr ope rl y sou ght r ei m bur se m en t, f

or c ontra st

m at er i al s . B ec au s e w e s ee al s o n o ab u s e o f d i s cr et i o n i n t h e d i s t ri ct co u rt ’s3

dis co ve ry r uli ngs, w e af

fi rm the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s de nia l of dis co ve ry

on p re -2 000 claim s as we ll as the district court’ s refusal to re view cla im s outs ide of the stated tim e range. AFFIRMED.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1755

To amend the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996

to provide that assistance shall be available under the noninsured crop

assistance program for native pasture for livestock, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 14, 1996

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform

Act of 1996 to provide that assistance shall be available

under the noninsured crop assistance program for native

pasture for livestock, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATIVE PASTURE FOR LIVESTOCK.

4 Section 196(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Agriculture Im5 provement and Reform Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–127)
2

•S 1755 IS

1 is amended by inserting ‘‘native pasture for livestock,’’

2 after ‘‘fish),’’.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated March 1, 1996, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of The Coast Distribution System and
Subsidiaries (the Company) included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Company's Registration Statements on Forms S-8
(File Nos. 33-10769, 33-15322, 33-18696, 33-64582 and 33-86072, effective
December 12, 1986, June 25, 1987, December 1, 1987, June 17, 1993 and November
8, 1994, respectively) and on Form S-3 (File No. 33-33780, effective March 9,
1990).


GRANT THORNTON LLP


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

San Jose, California
March 1, 1996
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C., SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Star E Media Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ghaby ("Gabriel") Nassar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: May 20, 2003
 
 
 /s/  Gabriel Nassar
 Ghaby ("Gabriel") Nassar
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Star E Media Corp. and will be retained by Star E Media Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 15.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Stimulation Plan for FutureGen Alliance

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Page I1of 1

ATTACHMENT I : STIMULATION PROGRAM

Facility Name: FutureGen 2.0 Morgan County CO 2 Storage Site

IL -137-6A-0003 (Well #3)

Facility Contacts: Kenneth Humphreys, Chief Executive Officer,

FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc., Morgan County Office, 73 Central Park Plaza East, Jacksonville, IL 62650, 217-243 -8215

Location of Injection Well: Morgan County, IL; 26−16N−9W; 39.80097 oN and 90.07544 oW

The need for stimulation to enhance the injectivity potential of the Mount Simon Sandstone is not anticipated at this time. The need for stimulation will be determined once the characterization data from
the CO 2 injection wells are available and have been evaluated (i.e., results of geophysical logs, core analyses, hydrogeologic testing). If it is determined that stimulation techniques are needed, a stimulation plan will be developed and submitted to EPA Region 5 for review and approval prior to conducting any
stimulation.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2041 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2041

 To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 
 with respect to the dumping of dredged material in Long Island Sound, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

 Mr. D'Amato (for himself, Mr. Moynihan, and Mr. Faircloth) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 
 with respect to the dumping of dredged material in Long Island Sound, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Long Island Sound Preservation and 
Protection Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. DUMPING OF DREDGED MATERIALS IN LONG ISLAND SOUND.

    Section 106(f) of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries 
Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1416(f)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(f) Dumping of Dredged Material in Long Island Sound.--
            ``(1) In general.--No dredged material from any Federal or 
        non-Federal project that contains any of the constituents 
        prohibited as other than trace contaminants (as defined by the 
        Federal ocean dumping criteria stated in section 227.6 of title 
        40, Code of Federal Regulations) may be dumped in Long Island 
        Sound or Block Island Sound except in a case in which it is 
        demonstrated to the Administrator, and the Administrator 
        certifies by publication in the Federal Register, that the 
        dumping of the dredged material containing the constituents 
        will not cause significant undesirable effects, including the 
        threat associated with bioaccumulation of such constituents in 
        marine organisms.
            ``(2) Federal projects exceeding 25,000 yards.--In addition 
        to other provisions of law and notwithstanding the specific 
        exclusion relating to dredged material of the first sentence in 
        section 102(a), any dumping of dredged material in Long Island 
        Sound from a Federal project (or pursuant to Federal 
        authorization) by a non-Federal applicant in a quantity 
        exceeding 25,000 cubic yards shall comply with the criteria 
        established under the second sentence of section 102(a) 
        relating to the effects of dumping.
            ``(3) Relation to other law.--Subsection (d) shall not 
        apply to this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
### Reg ul a tory Evalu ation
Docke t No. FAA- Directorate Iden ti fier: -AD



### !(vou make dlullg<!s 

### to the valu<!s ill 

### t/1<! tub!<! 

### bdow. you 11//lstensw·e 

### the totals update o c cording/y. (( 

### ti1 E :v do 

### not. dick (o r TahJ 

### i11to wu1 rh<!n our 

### of the c hanged a ll
. Estimate d Cos t s : Act ion Cost s per Pro du ct (e.g ., airc r aft , engine , (e
. g . , Inspection , propell er , app l iance) Work

- hours Labor Patts Cost Tota l Costs Number of To t al Cost rep lacement) ( include cost (labor + 

# u. s. for U
. S
. Fleet Do not include oncondition cos ts here access, testing, ( @ $85 /h patts) Reg iste r ed and close-up) our) P ro ducts D e t a il ed In spection 7
. 0 

### 184 Min i mum thic k ness and Machin i ng 

### 7
.0 

### 184 D efect Inspection '

'



# ,, ' ' '
'

T he known n umber of products in comp li a n ce: Tota l Co s ts of complian ce for U.S. fleet: $218 , 960 Cost s co v ered u nder warranty 

### (if known) $
O n- Cond itio n Costs: 

# 0 Act ion Work-hours Labor cost Parts C o st C o st per Product (e.g
. , Inspection, (includ e acc e s s, ( @ $85 / hour)

rep lacement) testing , and cl o s e up) Replac e ment 6.0 

### $ 1 3,720 Overhau l 6.0 ' 

### Specia l co n s idera tion s f or Eco nom ic Ana lys i s ( U se this fi e ld r o e xplain anythin g in the Estimate d C osts table that was ass umed o r might not b e o bvious
. This.fr e ld can al s o be used to explain warrant y c o s ts):

### Executive Order 12866: 

### Could the AD be considered a " significant regulatory action"? 

# . a YES* 

# D NO 

### [g) *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

### Is the AD significant?

# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

### [g) *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No

# answer.**~** YES 

# D NO 

### [g) Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

### This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

### [g) *Explanation:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, I, Thomas R. Moyes, certify that:

 

1.  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of MediCor.

 

Date: June 6, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Thomas R. Moyes     |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas R. Moyes         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Flamel Technologies S.A. (the "Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen H. Willard, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Stephen H. WillardStephen  H. WillardChief Executive OfficerJune 9, 2011
1

From: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Robert Strieter <bstriete@aluminum.org>, Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com

Cc: gary.barnett@aleris.com

Date: 05/27/2010 09:28 AM

Subject: Uncontrolled Group 1 Furnaces

We are planning to use the metal HAPs data that we get from the controlled sources and apply it to the 

uncontrolled sources for the risk calculations. The other alternative would be to have the "testing 

companies" spend an additional $20,000 per company for Method 29 to test the uncontrolled furnaces 

and I did not want to add in another test. If the risk are high using the allowables, then we will look at 

actuals, still using the test data, but with your PM emission rate from the stack test. This is another 

reason why we are asking for actuals and allowables. Let me know if you have any other questions.

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
### IN THE COURT OF APP EALS OF TENNESS EE AT KNOXVI LLE A ugus t 13 , 200 7 S es sio n
RON DA L A KER S ET AL 

### . v. BUCKNE R-RUSH ENTE RPRISES , INC. ET AL 

### .

Appeal f rom the Circ uit Court for Bradley County Nos. V-02- 0620, V-02-623, and V-02-624 W. N eil Thomas, III, Judge

No. E2006-01513-COA- R3-CVF iled Novem ber 21, 2007

C H A RLES D. S US ANO , J R ., J., c on c ur ri ngin p a rt

a nd dis se nti ngin p a rt

. F or the reas on s stat e d in

my se pa ra te op ini on , c on c ur

ri ngin p a rt a nd dis se nti ngin p a rt , in the ca se of Robert H. Craw ford, Sr. et al. v. J. Avery Bryan Fun eral Hom e, In c. et al ., No. E2006- 00 98 7- CO A- R3- CV (T e nn . Ct . App . E.S. , fil e d Nov e mbe r 21, 20 07 ), Ire sp e c tf ull y dis se nt f ro m so muc h o f t he ma jor ity op ini on a s a ff ir ms the dis mis sa l of the c omp la int s fi le d by Ron da l D . A ke rs , Jr., Luc ind a

Ak e rs , D on na

B ur ns , Su sa n H a ll, Do y le Ha

rd e n, Ric ky Ha

rd e n, Sand

ra F og le , M oll ie C. Denton, and Elaine Waldron, ag ainst the individuals and entities d i rectly associate d with the operation of Tri-State Crematory , as to the cla ims in t hose complaints a l l egi ng outrag eous conduct/infliction of emotional distress. In all other re spects, I concur in the majority

opinion.

_______________________________ CHARL ES D. SUSANO, J R., J UDGE