alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 197 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 57
104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 197

                          [Report No. 104-34]

 To establish the Carl Garner Federal Lands Cleanup Day, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 11 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

Mr. Bumpers (for himself and Mr. Pryor) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, with an amendment
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish the Carl Garner Federal Lands Cleanup Day, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

<DELETED>SECTION 1. THE CARL GARNER FEDERAL LANDS CLEANUP 
ACT.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    The Federal Lands Cleanup Act of 1985 (36 U.S.C. 169i-
169i-1) is amended by striking ``Federal Lands Cleanup Day'' each place 
it appears and inserting ``Carl Garner Federal Lands Cleanup 
Day''.</DELETED>
    The Federal Lands Cleanup Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-402; 36 U.S.C. 
169i-169i-1) is amended by striking the terms ``Federal Lands Cleanup 
Day'' or ``Federal Lands National Cleanup Day'' each place they occur 
and inserting in lieu thereof, ``Carl Garner Federal Lands Cleanup 
Day''.
                                     

                                                        Calendar No. 57

104th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 197

                          [Report No. 104-34]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To establish the Carl Garner Federal Lands Cleanup Day, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                April 7 (legislative day, April 5), 1995

                       Reported with an amendment
```
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1912

To clarify the provision of section 3626(b) of title 39, United States Code,

defining an ‘‘institution of higher education’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 27, 1996

Mr. PRYOR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To clarify the provision of section 3626(b) of title 39, United

States Code, defining an ‘‘institution of higher education’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

4 Paragraph (3) of section 3626(b) of title 39, United

5 States Code, is amended by striking the period and insert6 ing ‘‘, and includes a nonprofit organization that coordi7 nates a network of college-level courses that is sponsored

8 primarily by nonprofit educational institutions for an older

9 adult constituency.’’.

Æ
EX-10.1



 EXHIBIT 10.1 

SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 

 

					
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	75,000	(1) 
	 Annual Equity Award
	  	$	120,000	(2) 
	 Chair of the Board
	  	$	120,000	 
	 Committee Annual Cash Retainers:
	  			
	 Audit Committee Chair
	  	$	20,000	 
	 Audit Committee Member
	  	$	5,000	 
	 Compensation and Personnel Committee Chair
	  	$	20,000	 
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair
	  	$	10,000	 

  

	(1)	 The annual retainer is payable in cash or restricted stock units, at the election of the non-employee director. 



	(2)	 The annual equity award is payable in the form of restricted stock units.
Motion Granted, Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed August

29, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-24-00317-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF WILLIAM SULLY 

GRIFFIN, III

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 and Probate Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. GN43476

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This interlocutory appeal is from two orders signed April 11, 2024, directing 

that a particular vendor provide caregiving and healthcare services to a ward. On 

August 19, 2024, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a). The motion is granted.

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
J

- S06043

- 19

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

WESLEY AARON DAVIS JR.

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 2398 EDA 2018 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered July 3, 2018 i n the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 23

- CR

- 0004440

- 2017 BEFORE: BOWES, J., DUBOW, J., and FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E. CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY BOWES, J.: FILED JUNE 2 6 , 2019 I join the portion of the Majority Memorandum holding that Appellant failed to establish that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his post

sentence challenge to the w eight of the evidence. Majority Memorandum at
4

- 5. While I also agree that Appellant’s sufficiency challenge merits no relief, I would not find the claim waived. O ur Supreme Court has reversed this Court’ s refusal to address a sufficiency challenge based upon a non - specific 1925(b) statement where it

was a “ relatively straightforward ” case with a modest

- sized evidentiary record and the trial court understood and addressed the claim. Commonwealth v. Laboy , 936 A.2d 1058, 1060 (Pa. 2007)

. Appellant was c onvicted of one crime: persons not to possess firearms

. That crime has two elements : (1) that the defendant possessed a firearm , and (2) that he was convicted on an enumerated offense that prohibited him fromJ

- S06043

- 19

- 2

-

doing so. Commonwealth v. Miklos , 159 A.3d 9 62, 967 (Pa.Super. 2017); 18 Pa.C.S. § 6105(a)(1). There is a single transcript from the one

- day trial , and the trial court addressed Appellant’s sufficiency challenge . Applying Laboy , I would not deem Appellant’s sufficiency challenge waived. Nonetheless, I agree that Appellant is entitled to no relief on his sufficiency challenge. Appellant acknowledges that the Commonwealth offered evidence to establish the elements of the offense, yet argues that his own testimony should have been credited instead. See Appellant’s brief at
11

- 14. This argument flies in the face of the well

- established principles that a jury is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence presented at trial, this Court will not disturb the jury’s credibility determina tions , and sufficiency review is conducted viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth as verdict

- winner

. See , e.g. , Commonwealth v. Trinidad , 96 A.3d 1031, 1038 (Pa.Super. 2014). Applying our standard of review , I would affirm Ap pellant’s conviction based upon the evidence detailed in the trial court’s opinion. See Trial Court Opinion, 9/12/18, at 14

- 15 (discussing Officer Kyle Hand’s testimony that he saw Appellant possess and discard a firearm, and the Commonwealth’s evidence o f Appellant’s prior robbery conviction) ; N.T. Trial, 4/25/18, at 57 (Officer Hand testifying that Appellant pulled a firearm out of his pocket and toss it to the ground)

. Therefore, I concur.J

- S06043

- 19

- 3

-

Judge Dubow joins the concurring memorandum.
<PAGE> 1


               SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549


                          FORM 10-K/A



     ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
           For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

Purpose:  To supplement in part Part IV, Item 14(c) of Company's
          previously filed Form 10-K in order to file as an
          exhibit the Annual Servicing Report of Company's
          Independent Public Accountants.

                  Commission File No. 000-20909

             REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1
     (Exact name of Registrant as specified in Department
      of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4)


                  HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION
                  (Master Servicer of the Trust)
      (Exact name as specified in Master Servicer's charter)



            DELAWARE                      36-3670374
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation of Master Servicer) Number of Registrant)


 2700 SANDERS ROAD, PROSPECT HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS         60070
(Address of principal executive offices of Master    (Zip Code)
Servicer)


Master Servicer's telephone number, including area code
(847) 564-5000



<PAGE>
<PAGE> 2


                         SIGNATURES




     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Master Servicer has duly
caused this report to be signed on behalf of the Revolving Home
Equity Loan Trust 1996-1 by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.




                          HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION,
                    as Master Servicer of and on behalf of the

                     REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1
                                 (Registrant)




Date:  May 8, 2000       By:/s/ John W. Blenke
                                 John W. Blenke
                                 Assistant Secretary











<PAGE>
<PAGE> 3


                           Exhibit Index


Exhibit No.    Exhibit

99             Copy of Independent Public Accountants Annual Servicing
               Report dated January 14, 2000.
----

**EXHIBIT 13.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 I, John P. Fairchild, Chief Financial Officer of Viceroy Exploration  Ltd. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that to the best of may knowledge:

|   | (i)    | the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for        the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Annual Report”)        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Annual Report        fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results        of operations of the Company.                                                                                                 |

|   | By:    | *“John P. Fairchild”* |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |   |                                   |
|   | Name:  | **John P. Fairchild**             |
|   | Title: | **Chief Financial Officer**       |
|   | Date:  | March 31, 2005                    |

*This written statement is being furnished to the Securities  and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on  Form 20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form  20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for  purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the  "Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated  by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or  the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates  it by reference.*

----
#### Juan Manuel DIAZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 01-70961.

INS No. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 17, 2003.

Decided Feb. 6, 2003.

Before FRIEDMAN,* KOZINSKI and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The Honorable Daniel M. Friedman, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

We have jurisdiction to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of a motion to reopen. *See Rodriguez-Lariz v. INS,*282 F.3d 1218, 1223 (9th Cir.2002). The BIA properly denied Juan Manuel Diaz’s motion, which raised the same insufficient factors of economic hardship, reduction in standard of living, and lack of educational opportunities previously rejected by the BIA. *See Agyeman v. INS,*296 F.3d 871, 890, n. 2 (9th Cir.2002); *see also Ramirez-Durazo v. INS,*794 F.2d 491, 498 (9th Cir.1986). The BIA therefore did not violate Diaz’s due process *844rights. *See Colmenar v. INS,*210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000).

PETITION DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TOWAMENCIN TOWNSHIP,

Respondent

v.

PENNSYLVANIA LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 621 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of December, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 20.1

March 26, 1999

                                  ANNUAL REPORT

                                MELLON BANK, N.A.

                    MELLON BANK HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1

                              ANNUAL PERIOD ENDING

                                DECEMBER 31, 1998


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                                     <C>            
Reimbursement of Previous Liquidation Loss Amounts for 1998 per Clause (viii) of
Section 5.03:

                                                                                        $        -0-

During the Revolving Period (1/98 and 2/98), Net Principal Allocation for 1998
per Clause (x) of Section 5.03:

         (a)      Distributed to Seller                                                 $   17,898,948.00
         (b)      Reinvested in Additional Mortgage Loans                               $   38,010,702.00 
         (c)      Deposited in Excess Funding Accounts                                  $        -0-


During the Amortization Period (3/98 through 12/98), the Certificate Principal
Collections per clause (xi) of Section 5.03:

                                                                                        $  302,740,665.00
During the Amortization Period (3/98 through 12/98), the portion of Principal
Collections distributed to the Seller:

                                                                                        $    7,985,667.00
</TABLE>


                                                  MELLON BANK, N.A., as Servicer



                                                  By     PATRICK RYAN         
                                                     --------------------------
                                                      Name:  Patrick Ryan
                                                      Title: Vice President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 16.1

                       [LETTERHEAD OF COOPERS & LYBRAND]


November 1, 1996

Mr. Duncan MacDonald
President
DMI, Inc.
2501 West Fifth Street
Santa Ana, California 92703

Dear Mr. MacDonald:

This is to confirm that the client-auditor relationship between DMI, Inc.
(Commission File Number 0-19875) and Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. has ceased.

Very truly yours,

/s/  Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


cc:  Office of the Chief Accountant
     SECPS Letter File
     Securities and Exchange Commission
     Mail Stop 11-3
     450 Fifth Street, N.W.
     Washington, D.C. 20549
     (By facsimile: 202-942-9656; original by U.S. mail)
#### James Scott JOHNSON et al., Appellants, v. L. A. SCOTT et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 12, 1961.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 29, 1961.

*925J. Milton Luker, Charles R. Luker, Jr., London, for appellants

William J. Weaver, London, for appel-lees.

WADDILL, Commissioner,

This case involves the question of whether certain child visitation privileges granted in the judgment are in the best interest of the infant child’s welfare. Under the peculiar circumstances disclosed by the record we are unwilling to say that the chancellor’s findings are clearly erroneous. CR 52.01.

Judgment affirmed.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

110) ll-E-70 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06 AM Sheet UO of 264 
P.2 

A 345 2 

ll-E>7 0 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

CuiuiHuiy: 

Contact Report 

Plastic Composites NESHAP 

Cfreg LaFlam, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc) 

April 10,1996 

Mr. Vinod C. Shah 

The Budd Company, Plastics Division, Van Wert, OH 

Tdephone Number; (810)619-2200 

Contact Summary: 

Asked followup questions concerning the company's response to the Composites 

Institute's March 1996 survey of the compression molding industry. 

At the company's three molding facilities, no cleaners are nsed other than the isopropyl 

alcohol used to clean parts prior to bonding and to remove excess glue fiom die edges of bonded 

parts. 

Two cleaners are used for the SMC machine and associated paste lines. The lines arc 

flushed using acetone (a closed system). jCMher fexigj^d) components ofthe machine axe cleaned 

with warmed Thennoclean/rdur colors of SMC aie produced: natural, very light blue, gray, and 

black. Color changes are infrequent (could be one per day). The company finds that acetone 

does an adequate job of cleaning the paste line*. 

REPORT IS ACCURATE 

,*wAti Acre '-«• ***"•*• "**'- *<o<JX. 

Poet-ir Fax Note 7671 um 

T« C\« ^ UFL^V 

Cc/Dcpt fti 

"•"""Cyi-yj 5»f»? ^ 

fan fan j 9»/-o*3V 

»faci9t \ 

f^"1" \\ttbj) SvVW 

Co. $«J»» 

PtNXW*, 

Fn 

CTVQ 'fll-*-*" ! 

*Ct\»J *«**>-

Mo'(.,. 

I i a 1 QQ4 i aorta PQWl- . MU X
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.27





FIRST AMENDMENT OF
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
WITH PATRICK J. ROE
This FIRST AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of December 18, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), by and among FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. (“FCFP”), FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL BANK (the “Bank,” and together with FCFP, the “Employer”), and PATRICK J. ROE (“Executive,” and together with the Employer, the “Parties”).
RECITALS
A.    The Parties have made and entered into that certain Employment Agreement, effective March 12, 2013 (the “Agreement”).
B.    Pursuant to Section 18 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by written agreement signed by the Parties.
C.    The Parties desire to remove the requirement in the Agreement that Executive be nominated to serve as a member of the Boards of Directors of FCFP and the Bank.
AGREEMENT
In consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants of the Parties set forth in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby expressly agree as follows:
1.The fourth sentence of Section 2 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety (which sentence had provided as follows: “During the Employment Period, Executive shall be nominated to serve as a member of the Bank Board and the Company Board, subject to the election of the applicable shareholders”.
2.In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
[Signature page follows.]






Exhibit 10.27





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of FCFP and the Bank has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf, and Executive acknowledges understanding and acceptance of, and agrees to, the terms of this Amendment, all as of the Effective Date.
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC.
By: /s/George Barr    
Print Name:         George Barr                
Title:         Chairman of the Board of Directors        
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL BANK
By: /s/George Barr    
Print Name:         George Barr                
Title:         Chairman of the Board of Directors        
PATRICK J ROE
/s/Patrick J. Roe    


2
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2109

To provide a 1-year delay in the imposition of penalties on small businesses

failing to make electronic fund transfers of business taxes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 20), 1996

Mr. DASCHLE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide a 1-year delay in the imposition of penalties

on small businesses failing to make electronic fund transfers of business taxes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF PENALTY ON SMALL BUSINESSES

4 FAILING TO MAKE ELECTRONIC FUND

5 TRANSFERS OF TAXES.

6 No penalty shall be imposed under the Internal Reve7 nue Code of 1986 solely by reason of a failure by a person

8 to use the electronic fund transfer system established

9 under section 6302(h) of such Code if—
2

•S 2109 IS

1 (1) such person is a member of a class of tax2 payers first required to use such system on or after

3 July 1, 1997, and

4 (2) such failure occurs during the 1-year period

5 beginning on July 1, 1997.

Æ