alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form S-8
No. 333-13381) pertaining  to the  Diamond Home Services,  Inc. Incentive  Stock
Option Plan  and the Diamond Home Services, Inc. 1996 Nonemployee Director Stock
Option Plan  of Diamond Home  Services, Inc.  of our report  dated February  20,
1998,  with respect  to the  consolidated financial  statements of  Diamond Home
Services, Inc. incorporated by reference  in the 1997 Annual Report (Form  10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1997.




Chicago, Illinois
March 26, 1998
AFS-10-311-E

Jul 09 2010

Exemp tion No. 131L Regul atory Docket No. FAA-2001-9519

Lt. Colonel Timothy M. Kersey Chief, Flight Standards Division Department of the Air Force

6500 South MacArthur Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73169

Dear Lt. Col. Kersey:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted y our petition to extend Exemption No. 131, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

On June 10, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviati on Administration (FAA) on behalf of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) for an extension of Exemption No. 131, as amended. That exemption from § 91.159 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons allows the USAF to conduct its hurricane reconnaissance flights without maintainin g the appropriate cruising altitudes as prescribed by § 91.159.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were th e basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for n ot publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register

because the requested extension of the exemption w ould not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the USAF.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for t he issuance of Exemption No. 131, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exempti on and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. § 40109, which the FAA Administrator has2

delegated to me, I grant your petition. Notwithsta nding the provisions of the exemption, the pilot of an aircraft engaged in the above operation s is not relieved of the responsibility to see and avoid other aircraft as required by other provi sions of the regulations.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exempt ion No. 131, as amended, to September 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or res cinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 131 , as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemp tion No. 131.

Sincerely,

/s/ Elizabeth Ray Director, Airspace and Aeronautical Information Man agment
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      USC. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Interstate Data USA, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Duane James, Vice President of Finance of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
                14, 2008
            
            /S/
                DUANE JAMESDuane
                James
              Vice
                President of Finance
              (Principal
                Financial Officer and
              Principal
                Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>   1
                               OPINION OF COUNSEL


             Moskowitz Altman & Hughes LLP has acted as counsel to Rainbow
Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the"Company"), in the preparation of
a Registration Statement on Form S-3 to be filed by the Company with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about December 19, 1996
(the "Registration Statement") in connection with the registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of up to 336,511 shares of the Company
Common Stock (the "Shares"), all of which are issued, outstanding and held by
certain stockholders named in the Registration Statement.

             As counsel to the Company, we have examined the proceedings taken
by the Company in connection with the issuance of the Shares. It is our opinion
that the Shares are legally issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

                                        MOSKOWITZ ALTMAN & HUGHES LLP



                                        By: /s/ John J. Hughes
                                           ---------------------------------
                                            John J. Hughes, Jr. Esq.,
                                             a Partner



New York, New York
December 18, 1996


                                       19
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

OROVER SELLERS 

*TronncY GcNLR*L 

~onoreblo BOO. 8. Bheppord 

Corptrollor or FubllS Aaoountm 

Auntin, tusa 

besr Yr. Bheppsrd: Opinion lo. 0-7021 

nrr Con8trtaotloll or Artl01e reeo, 

we hero your request tor 

jmot Rsttrr, 88 Tallawml 

one fur und 

~,on‘Both~ the fiscal and CSlSndar JSSrS.' 

\ ._~~ 

The psrtioulsr portion at Artlole bP20, sm to rhlch 

Tou requsrt sdrlce, lm ss follorsr 

‘* l l ; proridod thst no distrlot jud@ys or 

l ttorner d-m11 reoeire mo r e than CdOn.00 In any 

one rear under the prorjslonr of thlm srtiale.’ 
It ir our opinion thlr lenruars should he cor,rtmml 

to Absn ‘ii so81 ~esr’, 1-8 thsr thrr, l C8Yendrr ~bsr~~ rhlr aolrports with the lr~l~lstlra sohsme at disburmeme~ t. of publjo 

fnrdm rppropt’j8~ted t0 the expenses of the Govwwment, and the 

ststutb rhould thermform bo read and Conntrued in cnnrreetim 

wf th the sppropristlon sot*. 

a; 

ooie 8p + or 

Aeslntsnt
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03056

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 03056\03056_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03056\03056_Completeness_Checklist.XLS EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03056\03056_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

03056\Certification Statement Plant ID_03056.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James J. Baumberger, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 5, 2004
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer Regarding Periodic Report Containing Financial
      Statements pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Bruce
      W. Elder, the Principal Financial Officer of Crescent Financial Corporation,
      in
      compliance with 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, (i) the Form 10-Q filed by
      Crescent Financial Corporation (the "Issuer") for the quarter ended September
      30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that
      report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented
      therein.





Date:
                November 5, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Bruce W. ElderBruce
                W. ElderPrincipal
                Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

RENEE MAZER,

Petitioner

v.

SUSAN CORNBLUTH, BROOKE GLEN

BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL, AND

GHOSALA RAGHAVA REDDY M.D.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 69 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of September , 2019

, t he Petition for Allowance of Appeal,

treated as a Petition for Review is DENIED.
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**
I, Michael G. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of Accenture Ltd, the general partner ofAccenture SCA (the “Registrant”), certify that:
1.  I have reviewed the Registrant’s Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”) ; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the period presented in this quarterly report; 4.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theRegistrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the Registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this quarterly report any change inthe Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
5.  The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the Registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
Dated: January 7, 2005         /s/ Michael G. McGrath
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1572

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide funds and incentives

for closures of rail-highway crossings, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 23, 1996

Mr. DEWINE (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, to provide funds

and incentives for closures of rail-highway crossings, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railroad Crossing

5 Safety Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. FUNDS AND INCENTIVES FOR CLOSURES OF RAIL7 HIGHWAY CROSSINGS.

8 (a) INCREASE IN FEDERAL SHARE OF CROSSING

9 CLOSURES.—Section 120(c) of title 23, United States
2

•S 1572 IS

1 Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘rail-highway crossing clo2 sure,’’ after ‘‘carpooling and vanpooling,’’.

3 (b) INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR AT-GRADE CROSSING

4 CLOSURES.—Section 130 of such title is amended by add5 ing at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(i) INCENTIVE PAYMENTS FOR AT-GRADE CROSS7 ING CLOSURES.—

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

9 provision of this section and subject to paragraphs

10 (2) and (3), a State may, from sums available to the

11 State under this section, make incentive payments to

12 local governments in the State upon the permanent

13 closure by such governments of public at-grade rail14 way-highway crossings under the jurisdiction of such

15 governments.

16 ‘‘(2) INCENTIVE PAYMENTS BY RAILROADS.—A

17 State may not make an incentive payment under

18 paragraph (1) to a local government with respect to

19 the closure of a crossing unless the railroad owning

20 the tracks on which the crossing is located makes an

21 incentive payment to the government with respect to

22 the closure.

23 ‘‘(3) AMOUNT OF STATE PAYMENT.—The

24 amount of the incentive payment payable to a local
3

•S 1572 IS

1 government by a State under paragraph (1) with re2 spect to a crossing may not exceed the lesser of—

3 ‘‘(A) the amount of the incentive payment

4 paid to the government with respect to the

5 crossing by the railroad concerned under para6 graph (2); or

7 ‘‘(B) $7,500.

8 ‘‘(4) USE OF STATE PAYMENTS.—A local gov9 ernment receiving an incentive payment from a

10 State under paragraph (1) shall use the amount of

11 the incentive payment for transportation safety im12 provements.’’.

13 SEC. 3. GUIDELINES FOR ANALYSIS OF COSTS AND BENE14 FITS OF NEW RAILWAY-HIGHWAY CROSSINGS.

15 Not later than 18 months after the date of the enact16 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall

17 prescribe guidelines to assist the States in analyzing the

18 costs and benefits to the public of new railway-highway

19 grade crossings. The purpose of the guidelines is to en20 courage uniformity in the analysis of such costs and bene21 fits by the States.

Æ
### Re: HPV 2 Clariant submission of Test Data to satisfy TR Requirements CASRN 6624-11-0 Bob Boethling to: Paul Campanella 06/27/2012 10:34 PM Cc: Chuantung Lin, John Schaeffer, Kathryn Schechter, Marcus Aguilar

I reviewed the biodegradation study (OECD 301F method) submitted for this substance. The test was correctly run and the results are deemed reliable. The substance did not biodegrade, which was expected.

Robert Boethling, PhD Exposure Assessment Branch US EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (7406M) Washington, DC 20460 202-564-8533 (P) 202-564-8892 (F) [EPI Suite] http://www.epa.gov/opptintr /exposure/pubs/episuite.htm

[FatePointer] http://esc.syrres.com/fatepointer/search.asp

Paul Campanella 06/27/2012 04:41:23 PM Daniel and Bob, attached are the pdf's submitted...

From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US To: Chuantung Lin/DC/USEPA/US, Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: John Schaeffer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marcus Aguilar/DC/USEPA/US, Kathryn Schechter/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/27/2012 04:41 PM Subject: HPV 2 Clariant submission of Test Data to satisfy TR Requirements CASRN 6624-11-0

Daniel and Bob, attached are the pdf's submitted by Clariant to satisfy requirements under the test rule. Please review.

[attachment "Reach dossier of LSB-1 July 2010.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "A1Freeze Pt.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/ USEPA/US] [attachment "A2 BP.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "A3 VP.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "A4 Octonal Water.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling /DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "A5 Water sol.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "B Biodeg.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US]

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D. Chemical Information and Testing Branch Chemical Control Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 202-564-8091
#### Ex parte C. J. COLLINS (two cases).

Nos. 28186, 28187.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 25, 1956.

*510•No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Bexar County remanding appellant to the custody of the sheriff for delivery to the agent of the demanding State.

No statement of facts accompanies the record, and no bills of exception are found therein.

The proceedings being in all things regular and no errors appearing, the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
O. Hatler, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Gerald O. Hatler
--------------------------------------
Gerald O. Hatler
President and Chief Executive Officer

May 11, 2005
#### Sammy L. DOWDLE, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 02-3391.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 8, 2003.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Sammy L. Dowdle moves without opposition to voluntarily dismiss his petition for review 02-3391.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The unopposed motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.