alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
kodk-ex1017_298.htm



 

Exhibit (10.17)

Eastman Kodak Company
2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan

Award Agreement

This “Award Agreement” evidences an award of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and non-qualified stock options (“NQSOs”) by the Company under the Eastman Kodak Company 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  Capitalized terms not defined in this Award Agreement have the meanings given to them in the Plan.


	
Name of Grantee:
	
Jeffrey J. Clarke (the “Grantee”)

	
Grant Date:
	
March 12, 2014

	
Number of RSUs:
	
110,295 

	
Number of NQSOs:
	
114,943 with a strike price of $27.20

	
Vesting Schedule
	
 

 

The RSUs and NQSOs will only vest if the Grantee is continuously employed by the Company or any of its Affiliates from the Grant Date through the applicable Vesting Date, and any unvested RSUs and NQSOs will be forfeited upon any termination of employment.  

 

Notwithstanding the prior sentence, if the Grantee has an employment agreement with the Company that provides for continued or accelerated vesting upon certain qualifying terminations, the terms and conditions in that employment agreement will control.  

	
Delivery Date:
	
No later than 30 days after the applicable Vesting Date and subject to Section 16.4 of the Plan (Tax Withholding), the Company shall issue to the Grantee one Share (or, at the election of the Company, cash equal to the Fair Market Value thereof) for each RSU that vests on such date.   Also, upon Vesting, your NQSOs will allow you to purchase shares of Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) common stock at the strike price noted above.  Each option provides for the ability to purchase a single share of common stock.

	
Duration:
	
Notwithstanding the employment conditions noted under the Vesting Schedule, each NQSO will expire at the close of business on the day immediately prior to the seventh (7th) anniversary of the Grant Date, unless sooner forfeited in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Award Agreement or the Plan.

	
All Other Terms:
	
As set forth in the Plan.




The Plan is incorporated herein by reference, and, by accepting this Award, the Grantee agrees to be subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and this Award Agreement.  This Award Agreement and the Plan constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties with respect to the RSUs and NQSOs.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-Q
    November 8, 2007

By:

/s/ SHANNON K S JOHNSONDate



Shannon K S JohnsonChief Financial Officer
    (principal financial officer)   Form 10-Q
EXHIBIT 11.1
 Guangshen Railway Company Limited
 Code of Ethics for the Senior Management
 
  CHAPTER 1: GENERAL PROVISIONS
    CHAPTER 2: Code of Ethics
  - 1 -




---



##### 



- 2 -




---



##### 



- 3 -




---



##### 



CHAPTER 3: Judgment of whether a particular situation
or conduct complies with the Code or not
     CHAPTER 4: Punishment for the Violation of the Code
    - 4 -




---



##### 



CHAPTER 5: Supplementary Provisions
    - 5 -




---



##### 



Statement regarding Code of Ethics for the Senior Management
 
   - 6 -




---



##### 



Statement regarding Compliance with Code of Ethics for the Senior Management
    - 7 -
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JA NUARY 29, 2015

NO. 03

- 14

- 00132

- CV

Donald L. Knepp and Andrea L. Knepp, Appellant s

v.

K.R.A.K. Investments, LLC, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANTS ’ MOTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l cour t on April 30, 2014. Appellants have

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal

. The

appellant s shall pay al l costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Wisedriver.com, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 2005, I, Martha M. Padron, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisedriver.com, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.            Such Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.            The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Wisedriver.com, Inc.

 
| Dated: | December 20, 2005 |
|--------|-------------------|

Wisedriver.com, Inc.

By: /*s/ Martha M. Padron*

Chief Executive Officer and 

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 5235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01603]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question 
whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the 
BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than 
February 12, 2024.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#13507c7e7e767d67603d7263637f7a7072677a7c7d6053707b7a3d7561713d7c6174"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b381416161e150f08551a0b0b1712181a0f121415083b181312551d09195514091c">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Oxford Bank Corporation, Oxford, Michigan; to indirectly acquire 
voting securities of NO<INF>X</INF>, LLC, Oxford, Michigan, and thereby 
engage de novo in extending credit and servicing loans pursuant to 
section 225.28(b)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-01603 Filed 1-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Ex parte William E. L. THOMAS.

No. 38199.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 26, 1965.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 13, 1965.

*909Tom Upchurch, Jr., Amarillo, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State’s Atty., Austin, for the State.

McDONALD, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the 47th District Court of Potter County remanding appellant to the custody of the Sheriff of said County for delivery to an agent for the State of Tennessee.

The executive warrant issued by the Governor of Texas directing the arrest and delivery of appellant to the State of Tennessee was introduced.

Appellant testified that he was not in the State of Tennessee at the time that the offense was alleged to have been committed.

When the proper executive warrant is introduced, it is incumbent upon appellant to show that he is not the person charged in the demanding state. The testimony of the accused standing alone is not sufficient to show that he was not in the demanding state at the time the crime was committed. Ex Parte Ackton, 164 Tex.Cr.R. 548, 301 S.W.2d 86.

Peggy Green, a witness called in behalf of respondent, testified that she was in Memphis, Tennessee, at the time the offense of forgery was alleged to have been committed and that the appellant gave her a $98.30 check and identified himself as “Ford”.

The Governor’s warrant is sufficient. No issue was raised as to the identity of the person named in the warrant.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-07629, 333-38049, 333-84777 and 333-69095) pertaining to the
1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1996 Director Option Plan, 1991 Stock Plan,
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1998 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan of
Cardiac Pathways Corporation of our report dated July 28, 2000 (except for the
last paragraph of Note 4, as to which the date is February 13, 2001), with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cardiac
Pathways Corporation included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year
ended June 30, 2000.

                                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Jose, California
February 13, 2001
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David SWIFT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7667.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.

Decided Jan. 27, 2003.

David Swift, Appellant Pro Se. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

David Swift seeks to appeal his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” *Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr.,*434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting *United States v. Robinson,*361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (I960)). Swift’s criminal judgment was entered on the docket on September 20, 1990. The notice of appeal was filed on October 20, 2002.* Because Swift failed to file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 For purposes of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 4(c); *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988).
EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John daCosta, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/John daCosta
 Chief Financial Officer
 May 14, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-K AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         4,985,751
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  66,545,155<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,474,532
<INVENTORY>                                    139,313,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,960,504
<PP&E>                                         25,502,943
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,008,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 284,986,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,171,589
<BONDS>                                        52,612,550<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     98,231,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   284,986,849
<SALES>                                        243,819,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,898,754
<CGS>                                          180,712,495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,712,495
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,431,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                27,562,289
<INCOME-TAX>                                   10,781,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            16,780,770
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   16,780,770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.77
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $3,474,532.
<F2>Comprised of long-term debt.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.23

First Amendment to Employment Agreement between James Northup and  DuPont Photomasks, Inc., effective as of October 8, 2003

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is between James Northup, an individual ("Executive") and DuPont Photomasks, Inc. ("DPI")
and is effective October 8, 2003.

BACKGROUND



AMENDMENT

In consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Executive and DPI agree
as follows:

1.Definitions.Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have
the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

2.Term.The first sentence of Section 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its
entirety as follows:



3.Incentive Compensation.The first sentence of Section 1.4.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:



4.Annual Stock Option Grant.The second sentence of Section 1.5.2 of the Agreement is hereby amended and
restated to read in its entirety as follows:



5.Miscellaneous.The provisions of this Amendment supersede all provisions of the Agreement which are
inconsistent with the provisions of this Amendment. The Agreement, as modified by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement of Executive and DPI with respect to the subject matter of the
Agreement, and supersedes any prior agreements or understandings of Executive and DPI with respect thereto. This Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, all of which taken together shall
constitute a single agreement between the Parties.

121

---



In
witness whereof, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives, who by their signatures represent that they are so authorized, to be
effective as of the date written in the first paragraph above.

|DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.                        |  | JAMES NORTHUP                            
|---------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|/s/ Marshall C. Turner,Chief Executive Officer |  | /s/ James Northup,Chief Operating Officer
|Date: November 10, 2003                        |  | Date: November 7, 2003                   

122

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5547-5548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Reorganization of the Office of Strategic Business Initiatives

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  CDC has modified its structure. This notice announces the 
reorganization of the Office of Strategic Business Initiatives (SBI) to 
transfer its management of the CDC Gift Review Panel to the Office of 
Policy, Performance, and Evaluation.

DATES: This reorganization was approved by the Director of CDC on 
January 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Thurmond, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control 
and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS TW-2, Atlanta, GA 30329. 
Telephone 770-488-4401; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec9e89839e8b9fac8f888fc28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4d6c1cbd6c3d7e4c7c0c78ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Part C (Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention) of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and 
Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services 
(45 FR 67772-76, dated October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR 69296, 
October 20, 1980, as amended most recently at 88 FR 69188-69190, dated 
October 5, 2023) is amended to reflect the reorganization of the Office 
of Strategic Business Initiatives within the Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 
Specifically, the changes are as follows:

I. Under Part C, Section C-B, Organization and Functions

    <bullet> Change all instances of the acronym SBI to OSBI.
    <bullet> Delete item (2) of the OSBI (CAJT) functional statement 
and insert the following: (2) strengthens CDC's administrative guidance 
and change management through agency-wide conference, policy, 
delegations of authority, organization and functions, and records 
management.

[[Page 5548]]

    <bullet> Delete item (5) of the Office of Business Integrity and 
Strategic Management (CAJTB) functional statement and renumber the 
remaining items accordingly.

Delegations of Authority

    All delegations and redelegations of authority made to officials 
and employees of affected organizational components will continue in 
them or their successors pending further redelegation, provided they 
are consistent with this reorganization.

(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3101)

Dia Taylor,
Acting Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2024-01708 Filed 1-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, PaulR. Kimmel, Chief Financial Officer of MediCor Ltd. (the “Registrant”), certifythat:

1.             Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             TheRegistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is likely to materially affect, the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.             TheRegistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Dated: November 2, 2006        |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| /s/ Paul R.  Kimmel            |   |
| Paul R. Kimmel,                |
| Chief Financial  Officer       |
| (Principal  Financial Officer) |

 

----