alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.71
  CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT  of the  AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION  of  CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
  1.
    
    They are the president and the secretary, respectively, of Chicago Title Company of Atameda
County, a California corporation.2.
    
    Article I of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of this corporation is
amended to read as follows:
  3.
    
    The foregoing amendment of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation has
been duly approved by the board of directors.4.
    
    The foregoing amendment of Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation has been duly
approved by the required vote of shareholders in accordance with Section 002. California
Corporations Code. The total number of outstanding shares of the corporation is 200. The
number of shares voting in favor of the amendment equaled or exceeded the vote required The
percentage vote required was more than 50%
   /s/ Raymond R. QuirkRaymond R. Quirk, President /s/ Todd C. JohnsonTodd C. Johnson, Secretary




---



##### 



CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
    ARTICLE I
  ARTICLE II
  ARTICLE III
  
 ARTICLE IV




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
      -2-




---



##### 



-3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
    /s/ Richard B. KelleyRICHARD B. KELLEY, President /s/ William L. MckennaWILLIAM L. MCKENNA, Secretary th
 /s/ Richard B. KelleyRICHARD B. KELLEY /s/ William L. MckennaWILLIAM L. MCKENNA 
 -5-




---



##### 



CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
 ARTICLE I
  ARTICLE II
  ARTICLE III
  
 ARTICLE IV
     ARTICLE V




---



##### 



-2-




---



##### 



-3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
  -5-




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
   /s/ Richard B. KelleyRICHARD B. KELLEY  /s/ Richard B. KelleyRICHARD B. KELLEY -6-
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,572-01

EX P ARTE ALVARO ANG EL RODRIGUEZ , Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1451265-A IN THE 178TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Four teenth C ourt of A p p eals affirmed his conviction. Rodriguez v. Stat e , No. 14-17-00613 (Tex. App. — Houston [14 Dist.] J une 1, 2019) (not desig nated for p u b l i ca t i o n )
. Applicant filed this t h application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to thi s Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On October 7, 2020, the trial court en t er ed an o rder desig nating issues. The district cler k proper ly forwa

rded this application to this Court u n d er T ex as Rule of Appellate Procedur e 73.4(b)( 5). Howeve r, the application was forwa rded befor e the trial court made finding s of fac t and
co n cl u s i ons of law. We rema nd this application to the trial court to complete its evident i ar yinvestiga tion and make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
. T h e t rial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety day s from the date of this order
. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavits, motions, objections , proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.
Filed: May

5, 2021 Do not publish
|   | (a)    | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Immunovative, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | (b)    | information contained in the quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Immunovative, Inc.                                     |

| Date: November 26, 2012 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Seth Shaw           |   |
| Seth Shaw               |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
# MRI Industry: Review of Proposed

**Accessibility Standards** 

**U.S. Access Board May 8, 2012**  **Atlanta, Georgia**  **Milind Dhamankar MD**  **Siemens Healthcare Sr. Director Product Marketing** **65 % N**  **S** 

# MR Physics Made Easy Hydrogen protons Computer to reconstruct images
Magnet 

# MRI **is Complex**

**65 % H**  **2 O**  Radio Frequency energy

Magnet



# Installation **needs a RF cabin**

### Ferrous materials w**ithin magnet room is a hazard!**  **Oxy gen cy** **linder**

**IV pole**

### Proposed requirements  M301.2  M305.2  M301.4 Current Abilities  MRIs designed to effectively image patients of all ages and sizes (up to table weight capacity/bore size)  “MRI conditional” wheel -chair, 

# Chapter M3: MRI

 M301.4  “MRI conditional” wheel -chair, transport trolley, patient transport shells are available  For MRI – Free standing overhead track lifts may be challenging due to the magnet, but MR compatible lifts possible.

### Proposed requirements  M301.2  M305.2  M301.4 Current Abilities  MRI table tops have patient positioning cushions, safety straps, side rails, iv stand holders and emergency pull– out mechanisms 

# Chapter M3: MRI

 M301.4 out mechanisms  Newer high -density, ultra- light coils come in all sizes ranging from extra-small loop coils to XXL body coils. **Positioning cushions** 

**MRI coils** 

## Patient Communication

**Advisory M**  **306.1** Proposed requirements  M306.1

– Improvement in patient 

### Current Abilities  Current MR systems comply with this requirement

– Improvement in patient communication during MRI exam  Patient communication unit

– Intercom communication with the patient

– Patient alert system (squeeze- bulb)  No radiation in MRI allows presence of patient relative / help next to the patient to coordinate tactile communication

# Moving Forward

• MRI manufacturers are committed to providing medical device access for all patients and are thankful for the opportunity to participate in standards development with the United States Access Board.

Thank You
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1676

To permit the current refunding of certain tax-exempt bonds.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 16, 1996

Mr. FAIRCLOTH (for himself and Mr. HELMS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To permit the current refunding of certain tax-exempt bonds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CURRENT REFUNDINGS OF CERTAIN TAX4 EXEMPT BONDS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 10632

6 of the Revenue Act of 1987 (relating to bonds issued by

7 Indian tribal governments) is amended by adding at the

8 end the following new sentence: ‘‘The amendments made

9 by this section shall not apply to any obligation issued

10 after such date if—
2

•S 1676 IS

1 ‘‘(1) such obligation is issued (or is part of a

2 series of obligations issued) to refund an obligation

3 issued on or before such date,

4 ‘‘(2) the average maturity date of the issue of

5 which the refunding obligation is a part is not later

6 than the average maturity date of the obligations to

7 be refunded by such issue,

8 ‘‘(3) the amount of the refunding obligation

9 does not exceed the outstanding amount of the re10 funded obligation, and

11 ‘‘(4) the net proceeds of the refunding obliga12 tion are used to redeem the refunded obligation not

13 later than 90 days after the date of the issuance of

14 the refunding obligation.

15 For purposes of paragraph (2), average maturity shall be

16 determined in accordance with section 147(b)(2)(A) of the

17 Internal Revenue Code of 1986.’’

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

19 subsection (a) shall apply to refunding obligations issued

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
1

Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- 2015-6823 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NE-38-AD

Add the work hours, parts cost, and number of U.S. registered products to the table below. When you are 

finished, click on the “Update Fields” button to automatically fill in the totals.

Update Fields

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 7 $ 595.00 $ 595.00 1 $ 595.00

Parts $ 0.00 780,000 $ 0.00 $ $780,000 

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: Number

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 780,595

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $Warranty

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Inspection $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
2

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* ☐ NO ☒

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* ☐ NO ☒

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES ☐ NO ☒

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* ☐ NO ☒
VIII 

104TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1586 

For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 1996 

Mr. COHEN (for himself and Ms. SNOWE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That, notwithstanding section 216(c)(3) of the Social Se4 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 416(c)(3)), for purposes of deter5 mining the eligibility for widow’s insurance benefits under 

6 section 202(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)) pursuant 

7 to an application for such benefits filed on March 21, 

8 1991, Nancy B. Wilson, social security number 000–00– 

9 2291, shall be considered the widow of Alphonse M. Wil10 son, social security number 000–00–9548, and shall be en11 titled to such benefits. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSKJLST7X2PROD with BILLS
SERVED: OCTOBER 8, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WORLD LOGISTICS SOLUTIONS, LLC 

DOCKET NO. F AA-20 15-0207 

(~ivil ?enalty:;\ction) 

. •·. ··<'I·' 

ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING 

On September 5, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin transferred to the 

Food and Drug Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge 

Goodwin to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. Any dates set for hearing or prehearing 

conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain in full force and effect 

absent further order. 

SO ORDERED. . .. ~·. 

Ronnie' A.' Y a 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment-Service List 

: ~- .. 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

David M. Hernandez, Respondent's Counsel 

Vedder, Price, P.C. 

1401 I Street, N.W., Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20005 

TEL: 202-312-3340 

FleX: 202-312-3322 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration, AGL-7 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 84 7-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0207 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

"\: 

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 197 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 197

 To establish the Carl Garner Federal Lands Cleanup Day, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 11 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

  Mr. Bumpers introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish the Carl Garner Federal Lands Cleanup Day, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THE CARL GARNER FEDERAL LANDS CLEANUP ACT.

    The Federal Lands Cleanup Act of 1985 (36 U.S.C. 169i-169i-1) is 
amended by striking ``Federal Lands Cleanup Day'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``Carl Garner Federal Lands Cleanup Day''.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                 |   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/      John      daCosta                                                           |   |   |   |   |
| John      daCostaChief      Executive OfficerDate:  November 13,      2009 |   |   |   |   |
#### Elvis TOLEFREE, Appellant, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, Appellee.

No. 91-2002.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

July 9, 1992.

*435Before LOKEN, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and BEAM, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that appellant review the records of the district court, the Kansas City Personnel Appeals Board, the Kansas City Department of Human Relations, and the EEOC to determine whether the complete records with respect to the appellant have been filed with this court. To the extent that there are documents, transcripts, correspondence, and other materials relating to the appellant’s case that have not yet been filed with this court, the appellant is directed to file them within 30 days of the date of receipt of this Order. The appellee is directed to cooperate with the appellant in providing these documents to the court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that simultaneously with the filing of the above documents, the parties shall file supplemental briefs addressing the following questions:

1. To what extent, if any, does *Brown v. St. Louis Police Dept.,*691 F.2d 393 (8th Cir.1982) control this case? In what respects do the *Brown*and *Tolefree*cases differ, especially with respect to claims for a remedy, theories of redress and procedures followed?

2. What are the respective roles of the Personnel Appeals Board, the Kansas City Department of Human Relations, and the EEOC in cases in which an employee of Kansas City alleges that he was discharged because of his race or because he filed a claim of racial discrimination against the City? Does any one of these agencies have exclusive jurisdiction to hear claims of racial discrimination? If not, can an employee decide with which agency to file his claim? What are the implications of the employee’s decision?

3.Must a discharged employee of Kansas City who appeals his termination to the Personnel Appeals Board raise any claim of discriminatory discharge before the Personnel Appeals Board, or can he choose to raise it before the Kansas City Department of Human Relations instead? If so, what are the implications of this choice?
**Exhibit****31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuantto Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, DavidGladstone, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Gladstone Capital Corporation;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this quarterly report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed inthis report any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data; and

 

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: May 13, 2004

 
| /s/  DAVID GLADSTONE                                        |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|  David Gladstone                                            |
| Chief Executive Officer  and  Chairman of the Board of Directors |

 

----
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form          10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: June 8, 2009
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman and Chief Executive Officer