alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 191

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to ensure that constitutionally

protected private property rights are not infringed until adequate protection is afforded by reauthorization of the Act, to protect against economic

losses from critical habitat designation, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 11 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself, Mr. LOTT, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. GRASSLEY, and

Mr. NICKLES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to ensure

that constitutionally protected private property rights are

not infringed until adequate protection is afforded by

reauthorization of the Act, to protect against economic

losses from critical habitat designation, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farm, Ranch, and

5 Homestead Protection Act of 1995’’.
2

•S 191 IS

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON DETERMINATION OF ENDAN2 GERED SPECIES AND THREATENED SPECIES

3 AND DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT.

4 Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973

5 (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)) is amended by adding at the end the

6 following:

7 ‘‘(4) MORATORIUM.—Notwithstanding para8 graphs (1) and (3), during the period beginning on

9 the date of enactment of this paragraph and ending

10 on the effective date of the first subsequent reau11 thorization of this Act, the Secretary may not—

12 ‘‘(A) determine that a species is an endan13 gered species or a threatened species under

14 paragraph (1); or

15 ‘‘(B) designate habitat of a species to be

16 critical habitat under paragraph (3).’’.

17 SEC. 3. AGENCY ACTIONS.

18 Section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973

19 (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)) is amended by adding at the end the

20 following:

21 ‘‘(5) MORATORIUM.—Notwithstanding para22 graphs (1) through (4), during the period beginning

23 on the date of enactment of this paragraph and end24 ing on the effective date of the first subsequent re25 authorization of this Act, a Federal agency shall not
3

•S 191 IS

1 be required to comply with paragraphs (1) through

2 (4).’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the quarterly report of CarePayment Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James T.
Quist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  May
17, 2010





/s/ James T.
Quist


James T.
Quist


Chief
Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                         |  |                                                     
|----------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2004 |  | /s/ JAMES J. BAUMBERGER
|                  |  | Name:                   |  | James J. Baumberger                                 
|                  |  | Title:                  |  | President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 18, 2008
 I-FLOW CORPORATION
 
 Delaware
    
    000-18338
    
    33-0121984(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEX-10.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
 I-Flow
 
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d) Exhibits
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description10.1
    
    Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement
between Silicon Valley Bank and I-Flow Corporation, dated as
of December 18, 2008.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Date:  December 22, 2008
    I-FLOW CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ James R. TalevichJames R. TalevichChief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Exhibit10.1
    
    Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement
between Silicon Valley Bank and I-Flow Corporation, dated as
of December 18, 2008.
Exhibit 31.1
 § 302 CERTIFICATION
             Date:  September 9, 2008
    /s/ Robert B. McKnight, Jr.Robert B. McKnight, Jr.Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|Dated: August 1, 2012  
|                       
|/s/ David Gladstone    
|David Gladstone        
|Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01424]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Loan 
Repayment Program.
    Date: March 22, 2024.
    Time: 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6710B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Christiane Robbins, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, DHHS, 6710B 
Rockledge Drive, Rm. 2121B, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 451-4989, 
[email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01424 Filed 1-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40641

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

VANESSA HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:16-CR-956-1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Vanessa Hernandez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40641 Document: 00514376874 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2018
No. 17-40641

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40641 Document: 00514376874 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2018
-----"Berger, Andy" <aberger@tristategt. org> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Berger, Andy" <a berger@tristategt.org> Date: 07/09/2010 12:52PM cc: "Walz, Barbara" <bwa lz@tristategt.org>, "Gil breath, Christopher S." <cgilbreath@tristategt.org>, "Johnson , Chantell" <cjohnson@tristategt.org> Subject: Questionnaire Extension Request Letter

Ms. Alicea-Virella,

With the attached letter, Tri-State G eneration and Transmission Associati on, Inc. requests a 120-day extension to the deadlines for re turning EPA’s Questionnaire for the Steam Elec tric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines for Craig Generating Station and Escalante Generating Station.

A hard copy of the letter is in the mail to you.

Please contact me if you have questions regarding this request.

Thank you,

Andy Berger

Andy Berger | Environmental Policy Analyst

Tri-State Generation and Trans mission Association, Inc.

Office: 303.254.3171 | Cell: 303.916.1289

Privilege and Confidentiality Notice

The electronic message above is intended only for the use of the i ndividual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privil eged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this me ssage is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent re sponsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any di ssemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strict ly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or te lephone and delete the original message immediately. 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

8/26/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3C0426DO

...
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6702

MUREL HOLLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus MICHAEL S. BRUCE, Officer, CO II; MARSHA GRIFFIN, Officer, CO II; TODD ALEXANDER, Officer, CO II, Defendants - Appellees, and RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; EUGENE M. NUTH, Warden; CAPTAIN LOCKLEAR, CO V; LIEUTENANT AULU, CO V; STUART H. SHAPIRO, M.D.; JEAN SNYDER; PATRICIA WRIGHT, Doctor, M.D.; MARCIA L. UPDIKE, Physician Assistant; MARVIN BRUCE, Physician Assistant, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-96-1745-WMN) Submitted: November 30, 1999 Decided: December 10, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.-2- Murel Holland, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Glen T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).*Although the district court's order of judgment is marked as "filed" on May 4, 1999, the district court's records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on May 5, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court's decision. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). -3- PER CURIAM: Murel Holland appeals the district court's order granting judgment as a matter of law to Defendants in his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) action on the basis that the pain and/or injury Holland suffered was de minimis and therefore insufficient to sustain a viable claim. We review a district court's grant of judgment as a matter of law de novo. See Scheduled Airlines Traffic Offices, Inc. v. Objective Inc. , 180 F.3d 583, 588 (4th Cir. 1999). On review, the facts are viewed and inferences are drawn in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party. See Singer v. Dungan , 45 F.3d 823, 827 (4th Cir. 1995). We have reviewed the record in light of the relevant case law and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Holland v. Lanham No. CA96-1745-WMN (D. Md. May 5, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
II

Calendar No. 486

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1874

[Report No. 104–311]

To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that

are obsolete or inconsistent with other statutes and to repeal a related

section of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 1996

Mr. JOHNSTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

JUNE 28, 1996

[Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment]

A BILL

To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are obsolete or inconsistent with other

statutes and to repeal a related section of the Federal

Energy Administration Act of 1974.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1874 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Energy

3 Standardization Act of 1996’’.

4 SEC. 2. STANDARDIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

5 REQUIREMENTS WITH GOVERNMENT-WIDE

6 REQUIREMENTS.

7 (a) DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REGULATIONS.—

8 (1) Section 501 of the Department of Energy

9 Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7191) is amended by

10 striking subsections (b) and (d).

11 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND12 MENT.—Section 501(e) of the Department of En13 ergy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7191(e)) is

14 amended by striking ‘‘subsections (b), (c), and (d)’’

15 and inserting ‘‘subsection (c)’’.

16 (b) SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS AFFECTING ADVISORY

17 COMMITTEES.—

18 (1) Section 624 of the Department of Energy

19 Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7234) is amended by—

20 (A) striking ‘‘(a)’’; and

21 (B) striking subsection (b).

22 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND23 MENT.—Section 17 of the Federal Energy Adminis24 tration Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 776) is hereby re25 pealed.

Calendar No. 486

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1874

[Report No. 104–311]

A BILL

To amend sections of the Department of Energy

of 1974.section of the Federal Energy Administration Actent with other statutes and to repeal a relatedOrganization Act that are obsolete or inconsistJUNE 28, 1996

Reported without amendment
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                         |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2011 |  | /s/ JAMES J. BAUMBERGER
|                   |  | Name:                   |  | James J. Baumberger                  
|                   |  | Title:                  |  | President and chief executive officer
CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Wisedriver.com, Inc. for the quarter ending March 31, 2003, I, Joshua Berger,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisedriver.com, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Amended Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending
          March 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Amended Quarterly Report on Form
          10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, fairly represents in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Wisedriver.com, Inc.

Dated:    October 12, 2004

Wisedriver.com, Inc.

By:  /s/ Joshua Berger
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
SCPW-20-0000615
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

ROLAND I. KEHANO, SR., Petitioner,

vs. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI # I; HAWAI # I PAROLING AUTHORITY, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-20-0000587; CASE NO. 2PR191000002; CR. NO. 92-0560)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Morikawa, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of petitioner Roland I. Kehano, Sr.’s “Objection/Reconsideration”, filed on November 23, 2020, which this court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the November 16, 2020 order denying the petition and motions,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, November 30, 2020. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Trish K. Morikawa Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-20-0000615 30-NOV-2020 10:29 AM Dkt. 29 ODMR
MICHAEL PERSAUD,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4249

Opinion filed October 6, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Michael Persaud, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gerald T. Mulligan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of LSB Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and,  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and,5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and theAudit Committee of the registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting,Date: November 13, 2006                                                              /s/ Gerald T. Mulligan   Gerald T. Mulligan   President and