alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

  STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Scientio, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Arthur Seidenfeld, Chief Executive and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify that:

  *   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  *   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Arthur Seidenfeld
---------------------
Arthur Seidenfeld
Director, President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

October 18, 2002

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.10


                PRENTISS PROPERTIES ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P.

  ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED
         PARTNERSHIP OF PRENTISS PROPERTIES ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P.


                                   RECITALS

          A.   Belcrest Realty Corporation ("ASSIGNOR")desires to assign and
Belmar Realty Corporation ("ASSIGNEE") desires to acquire 365,000 8.30% Series B
Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Units (THE "ASSIGNED UNITS") of
Prentiss Properties Acquisition Partners, L.P. (the "PARTNERSHIP").

          Pursuant to Article XI of the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of
Limited Partnership, as amended (as so amended, the "AGREEMENT"), of the
Partnership, Prentiss Properties I, Inc. as the sole general partner of the
Partnership (the "GENERAL PARTNER"), desires to amend the Agreement to admit
Assignee as a Substitute Limited Partner with respect to the Assigned Units.

          NOW, THEREFORE, the General Partner hereby adopts the following
amendment to the Agreement.

          1.   Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety as set forth on EXHIBIT A attached hereto.

          2.   Assignee accepts and agrees to be bound by the terms and
provisions of the Agreement.

                           [Signature Page Follows]

                                       1
<PAGE>

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the General Partner and the Assignee have executed
this Eleventh Amendment as of July 19, 2000.

                                   GENERAL PARTNER

                                   PRENTISS PROPERTIES I, INC.


                                        By:  /s/ MICHAEL A. ERNST
                                           ------------------------------------
                                        Name:    Michael A. Ernst
                                        Title:   Chief Financial Officer


                                   ASSIGNEE AND SUBSTITUTE LIMITED PARTNER:

                                   BELMAR REALTY CORPORATION

                                        By:  /s/ THOMAS E. FAUST, JR.
                                           ------------------------------------
                                        Name:    Thomas E. Faust, Jr.
                                        Title:   Executive Vice President

                                       2
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.

|Name                                            |  | Organized Under Laws of   |  | Ownership
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ---------
|DuPont Dai Nippon Engineering                   |  | Delaware                  |  | 50.0%    
|DuPont Photomasks Company Limited, Shanghai     |  | Peoples Republic of China |  | 71.5%    
|DuPont Photomasks Delaware, Inc.                |  | Delaware                  |  | 100.0%   
|DuPont Photomasks Foreign Sales Corporation     |  | Barbados                  |  | 100.0%   
|DuPont Photomasks (France) S.A.S.               |  | France                    |  | 100.0%   
|DuPont Photomasks GmbH                          |  | Germany                   |  | 100.0%   
|DuPont Photomasks Korea Limited                 |  | Republic of Korea         |  | 100.0%   
|DPI Reticle Technology Center, LLC              |  | Delaware                  |  | 25.0%    
|DuPont Photomasks Japan Company, Limited        |  | Japan                     |  | 100.0%   
|DuPont Photomasks Singapore Pte Limited         |  | Singapore                 |  | 100.0%   
|DuPont Photomasks Taiwan, Limited               |  | Republic of China         |  | 47.4%    
|Taiwan DuPont Photomasks Investment Co., Ltd.   |  | Republic of China         |  | 100.0%   
|Orion Operating Corp.                           |  | Delaware                  |  | 100.0%   
|DPI Holdings, Inc.                              |  | Delaware                  |  | 100.0%   
|Bindkey Technologies, Inc.                      |  | Delaware                  |  | 100.0%   
|Bindkey Technologies Germany GmbH               |  | Germany                   |  | 100.0%   
|DuPont Photomasks Germany GmbH                  |  | Germany                   |  | 100.0%   
|Advanced Mask Technology Center GmbH & Co. KG   |  | Germany                   |  | 33.3%    
|Maskhouse Building Administration GmbH & Co. KG |  | Germany                   |  | 33.3%    
|DuPont Photomasks Suzhou Ltd.                   |  | Peoples Republic of China |  | 100.0%   

---

QuickLinks
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 17, 2010

s1214 

# Order

December 17, 2010

142085

SC: 142085 COA: 295145 In re M. SESSIONS, Minor. Oakland CC Family Division: 2005-703877-NA

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1899 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1899

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
          Entitled the ``Mollie Beattie Wilderness Area Act''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 702(3) of Public Law 96-487 is amended by striking 
``Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Wilderness'' and inserting ``Mollie 
Beattie Wilderness''. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 
place a monument in honor of Mollie Beattie's contributions to fish, 
wildlife, and waterfowl conservation and management at a suitable 
location that he designates within the Mollie Beattie Wilderness.

            Passed the Senate June 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1899

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

          Entitled the ``Mollie Beattie Wilderness Area Act''.
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4609-4610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01296]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C.,

[[Page 4610]]

as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose 
confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Study Section.
    Date: February 29-March 1, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge I, 6705 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Fungai Chanetsa, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 206-B, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 402-9394, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f293a21282e26612c272e212a3b3c2e0f21262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5c3d0cbc2c4cc8bc6cdc4cbc0d1d6c4e5cbcccd8bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 18, 2024.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01296 Filed 1-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should no t be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

December 21, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41673

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM FERREIRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 2:04-CR-180-ALL

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

William Ferreira appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty-plea conviction of passing counterfeit money in violation of

18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 473. Ferreira’s contention that the district

court erroneously relied on his equivocal acceptance of responsibility as a basis for departure after giving him credit for acceptance of responsibility is without merit. The district court madeNo. 04-41673

-2-

it plain that the departure was based on its conclusion that Ferreira’s criminal history category of VI did not adequately reflect

the seriousness of his criminal history or the likelihood of recidivism in light of his Ferreira’s forty criminal history points and

the similarity of the instant offense to past offenses. Underrepresentation of criminal history is a proper basis for departure.

United States v. Smith , 417 F.3d 483, 491 (5th Cir. 2005).

As Ferreira contends, the dist rict court did state that the

equivocal nature of his acceptance of responsibility when speaking

with the probation officer was another reason for departure. The

district court made it plain, however, th at the criminal history

score was the prima ry reason supporting the departure and stated

that it would have imposed the same departure even if Ferreira had

been truthful when speaking to the probation officer. Thus, we

need not determine whether the court erred, because any purported

error was harmless. S ee United States v. Akpan

, 407 F.3d 360, 376-

77 (5th Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Cade , 279 F.3d 265,

273 (5th Cir. 2002).

Although Ferreir a contends that the departure should be reviewed for reasonableness, he does not argue that the departure was

unreasonable; therefore, he has abandoned any such argument. See

United States v. Lucien

, 61 F.3d 366, 370 (5th Cir. 1995). In any

event, the extent of the departure was reasonable. S ee Smith

, 417

F.3d at 491-92. Accordingly, the judgment of sentence is AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
 
   
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
    
 
   
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
    
 
   
We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions "Experts" and
"Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and to the use of our report dated June
4, 1996 in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-12723) and related
Prospectus of UroHealth Systems, Inc. for the registration of 5,750,000 shares
of its common stock.
    
 
   
We also consent to the incorporation by reference herein of our report dated
June 4, 1996 included in the UroHealth Systems, Inc. Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the transition period ended March 31, 1996 with respect to the consolidated
financial statement schedule of UroHealth Systems, Inc. included herein.
    
 
   
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
    
 
   
Orange County, California
    
   
November 6, 1996
**EXHIBIT 12**

**FIRST REPUBLIC PREFERRED CAPITALCORPORATION**(A Majority Owned Subsidiary of First Republic Bank)

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF  RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|  
  
**Quarter Ended September 30,**

  
**Nine Months Ended September 30,**

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
**2002**

  
**2001**

  
**2002**

  
**2001**

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
**(Dollars in thousands)**

 
I.

Earnings:

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
Net income

 
$

2,753

 
$

2,055

 
$

8,475

 
$

6,109

 
 
Fixed charges excluding preferred stock dividends

 
 
—  

 
 
—  

 
 
—  

 
 
—  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings before fixed charges

 
$

2,753

 
$

2,055

 
$

8,475

 
$

6,109

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
II.

Fixed charges:

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
Preferred stock dividends

 
$

2,475

 
$

1,545

 
$

7,188

 
$

4,445

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
III.

Ratios of earnings to fixed charges

 
 
1.11x

 
 
1.33x

 
 
1.18x

 
 
1.37x

 
 
 
 
 
 
  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

I, Bill Chester, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on				Form 10-QSB of Terax Energy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does				not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to				state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in				light of the circumstances under which such statements were				made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this				report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial				statements, and other financial information included in this				report, fairly present in all material respects the financial				condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small				business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this				report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and				maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in				Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small				business issuer and have:

> 
(a) Designed such disclosure controls						and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and						procedures to be designed under our supervision, to						ensure that material information relating to the small						business issuer, including its consolidated						subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those						entities, particularly during the period in which this						report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of						the small business issuer's disclosure controls and						procedures and presented in this report our conclusions						about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and						procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this						report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any						change in the small business issuer's internal control						over financial reporting that occurred during the small						business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small						business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of						an quarterly report) that has materially affected, or is						reasonably likely to materially affect, the small						business issuer's internal control over financial						reporting.

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent				evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the				small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the				small business issuer's board of directors (or persons				performing the equivalent functions):

> 
(a) All significant deficiencies and						material weaknesses in the design or operation of						internal control over financial reporting which are						reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business						issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and						report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not						material, that involves management or other employees						who have a significant role in the small business						issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: May 13, 2005

 

/s/ Bill Chester                            

Bill Chester,

President and

Principal Financial Officer
II

Calendar No. 616

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1977

To designate a United States courthouse located in Tampa, Florida, as

the ‘‘Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 19, 1996

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

SEPTEMBER 18, 1996

Reported by Mr. CHAFEE, without amendment

A BILL

To designate a United States courthouse located in Tampa,

Florida, as the ‘‘Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SAM M. GIBBONS UNITED

4 STATES COURTHOUSE.

5 The United States courthouse located at 611 North

6 Florida Avenue in Tampa, Florida, shall be known and
2

S 1977 RS

1 designated as the ‘‘Sam M. Gibbons United States Court2 house’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

6 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

7 to be a reference to the ‘‘Sam M. Gibbons United States

8 Courthouse’’.

Calendar No. 616

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1977

A BILL

To designate a United States courthouse located in

States Courthouse’’, and for other purposes.Tampa, Florida, as the ‘‘Sam M. Gibbons United

SEPTEMBER 18, 1996

Reported without amendment
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-05-5-2314-38300-371-CV

MARY AUTREY D/B/A MARY AUTREY 	APPELLANT

AND ASSOCIATESJoOhHnNnNyY WiIlLlLiIaAmMsSoOnN aAnNdD ShHaAyYlLyYnN WiIlLlLiIaAmMsSoOnN	

APPELLANTS	

SHAYLYN WILLIAMSONStTeEwWaArRtT DeEVoOrReE, JrR. aAnNdD 	appeAPPELLANTS

MaArRiIlLyYnNnN M. DeEVoOrReE

	V.

RANDALL YOUNG   	APPELLEE

FiIrRsStT TeExXaAsS HoOmMeEsS, InNcC. dD/bB/aALiIbBeErRtTyY AsSsSeEtT MaAnNaAgGeEmMeEnNtT, LLC G GALLERY CUSTOM HOMES D/B/A FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES	APPELLEES

GALLERY CUSTOM HOMES D/B/A FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES

FIRST TEXAS CUSTOM HOMES

aAlLlLeErRyY CuUsStToOmM HoOmMeEsS dD/bB/aA FiIrRsStT TeExXaAsS CuUsStToOmM HoOmMeEsS

	----------

	FROM COUNTY393RDCOUNTY THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT  COURT AT LAW NO. 3 AT LANW NO. 1 OF TARRANT DENTON TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	On jUNEJune 2oOCTOBER ctober 218CTOc, 2005April 12, 2001, we notified appellants that their its brief had not been filed as required by TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

	Because appellant’s’ brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

	Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM 		

PANEL D:	cayMCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON,  , J.and DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

	DELIVERED:  j  nOVEMBER November 10, 2005JUNEune 30, 2005	DO NOT PUBLISH

		TEX. R. APP. P.  47.3(a)
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Allied Holdings, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-8 (nos. 333-72053, 333-51104, 333-62440, 333-91942, 333-107455, and
333-107456) and form S-4 (No. 333-37113), of Allied Holdings, Inc. of our report
dated April 7, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Allied
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the years then ended and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the Allied Holdings, Inc. 2003 Annual Report on Form
10-K. Our report refers to a change in accounting to adopt the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets" in 2002.

Our report refers to our audit of the adjustments that were applied and
disclosures added to restate the 2002 and 2001 consolidated financial
statements. Our report also refers to our audit of the transitional disclosures
required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets", to revise the 2001 consolidated financial statements.
However, we were not engaged to audit, review or apply any procedures to the
2001 consolidated financial statements other than with respect to such
adjustments and disclosures.



                                       /s/ KPMG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
April 7, 2004