alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 Attachment

Vanessa - Here is the report. NOX Control Update to PPL Montana Colstrip Units 1&2 BART Analysis. It is marked

"amended October 18, 2011. We are submitting this to help avoid future confusion as to which report i s the most recent.

I notice that on EPA's regional haze website for MT , the older version is still linked.

If you have any questions, please let me know.

Thanks

Jim

The information contained in this message is intend ed only for the personal and confidential use of th e recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this mes sage is not the intended recipient or an agent resp onsible for

delivering it to the intended recipient, you are he reby notified that you have received this document in error

and that any review, dissemination, distribution, o r copying of this message is strictly prohibited. I f you have

received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

Amended BART Update report for Units 1&2 for NOx

Parker, James M

to:

Vanessa Hinkle

02/13/2012 05:46 PM

Hide Details

From: "Parker, James M" <jmparker@pplweb.com>

To: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA

History: This message has been forwarded.

NOx Control Update to PPL Montana's Colstrip Genera ting Station BART Report (Revised _ Amended).pdf 

### Page 1 of 1

3/27/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\vhinkle\Local Sett ings\Temp\notes7A42A6\~web9165.htm
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40434

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NOE SANTA MARIA-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. V-96-CR-8-S-1

- - - - - - - - - -

February 12, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Noe Santa Maria-Martinez (“Santa

Maria”) has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Santa Maria has responded to counsel’s

brief. Our independent review of the brief, Santa Maria’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. 

Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
No. 

-2-
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon D. Browning, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Gordon D. Browning                              
|Gordon D. Browning                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                                                    
|December 9, 2009
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:55 AM

To: 'dconover@compasslight.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Petition for Exemption: Compass Light, Inc. (FAA-2015-0255)

May 28, 2015 

Dear Mr. Conover: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0255). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by 

Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and 

remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the 

requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by June 11, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
Exhibit 10.8


 


March 15, 2005


 


Stephen R. Barker


Tower Finance, Ltd.


49169 Lake Avenue


McGregor, MN  55760


 


Dear Steve:


 


You have acted as a finder for MedicalCV, Inc. during past
attempts to raise capital.  The Company
is about to close on a transaction in excess of $10 million.  This transaction will include certain
investors previously introduced to MedicalCV by Tower.  Other investors have been introduced by the
Company’s non-exclusive agent, J. Giordano and Company.  The terms of this offering contemplate paying
a 6 percent commission on funds received and issuing 6 percent warrants on
shares issued to each investor specifically introduced to MedicalCV by either
Tower or Giordano.


 


Our agreement would be to pay Tower, 6 percent on funds invested by:


 


•                  Perkins Capital
Management, Dick Perkins, Dick Perkins Jr, and/or Dan Perkins


 


•                  Robert Furst,
and/or Alternative Strategy Advisors


 


•                  Whitebox
Investors, and or Gary Kohler or Andy Redleaf


 


In addition, MedicalCV will issue warrants to purchase warrants in an
amount equal to 6 percent of the total consideration (from the named investors)
to be priced on the same terms as the Investors in the Private Placements.


 


This will constitute our current agreement and will cancel any prior
agreements between MedicalCV and Tower.


 


If you are in agreement with these terms, please sign below and return
an original to me.


 


Thank you for your participation in the future of MedicalCV.


 


Sincerely:


 


 


	
  /s/ Marc Flores

  	
   

  
	
  Marc Flores

  



 


I, Stephen R. Barker, Consultant, Tower Finance, Ltd., agree to the
terms of this letter and acknowledge that it cancels and supersedes all prior
agreements with MedicalCV, Inc.


 


	
  /s/ Stephen R. Barker

  	
   

  	
  3/16/05

  	
   

  
	
  Stephen R. Barker

  	
  Date
#### In the Matter of TASTEE DONUTS, INC., Debtor Tastee Donuts, Inc., Appellant, v. Linda Leaumont PRICE, Wife of/and Thomas L. Price, Appellees.

No. 92-3728

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 6, 1993.

Deborah Weisler Hayes, Douglas S. Draper, Friend, Wilson, Draper, Hubbard and Bowling, Gordon P. Wilson, New Orleans, LA, for appellant.

Linda Leaumont Price, pro se.

*223Robert L. Raymond, Destrehan, LA, for Thomas Price.

Before REAVLEY, JONES and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

One question of law determines the outcome of this appeal: whether the prohibition against covenants not to compete contained in La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 23:921 (West 1985)1 applies to franchise contracts in the absence of an employment relationship between the contracting parties. The district court held that the section 921 prohibition applied to covenants not to compete in franchise agreements that create no employment relationship. The court only cited *Fine v. Property Damage Appraisers, Inc.,*393 F.Supp. 1304, 1311 (E.D.La.1975), in support of its decision. No Louisiana court has followed *Fine’s*discussion concerning the scope of section 921. But a Louisiana court has held to the contrary: “[section] 921 applies only to persons in employee-employer relationships and will not be extended to other relationships by judicial construction or interpretation.” *Simpson v. Kelly Servs., Inc.,*339 So.2d 490, 495 (La.App. 2d Cir.1976), *writ denied,*341 So.2d 1121 (La.1977); *see also NAPASCO Int’l, Inc., Western Div. v. Maxson,*420 So.2d 1276, 1278-79 (La.App. 3d Cir.1982) (agreeing with *Simpson*as to the limited scope of section 921, but finding an employment relationship); *cf. Winston v. Bourgeois, Bennett, Thokey and Hickey,*432 So.2d 936, 940 (La.App. 4th Cir.1983) (Louisiana courts will examine the actual nature of the relationship between contracting parties to decide whether section 921 applies, regardless of the contract form or the contracting party’s title.). This court has followed *Simpson*in deciding that section 921 does not govern independent-contractor relationships. *Taquino v. Teledyne Monarch Rubber,*893 F.2d 1488, 1497-98 (5th Cir.1990).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

1

. In 1991, Louisiana’s legislature excluded franchise contracts from the scope of section 921, *see id.*§ 921(E) (West Supp.1993), but the parties executed the contract at issue in this case before 1991. *See Alexandria Anesthesia Serv. v. Firmin,*576 So.2d 1236, 1237 (La.App. 3d Cir.1991) (Amendments to section 921 are not retroactive.).
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEE
    /s/
    

W. Brand InlowW. Brand InlowTrustee
EXHIBIT 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Guangshen Railway Company Limited

The following table lists information concerning the significant subsidiaries of Guangshen Railway Company Limited, or the Company, as of December 31, 2015:



|                                                                             |  |                         |  |                                          |       |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | ----- | -
|Name                                                                         |  | Country ofIncorporation |  | Percentage ofInterest held byour Company |      
|Dongguan Changsheng Enterprise Company Limited                               |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 51    | %
|Shenzhen Fu Yuan Enterprise Development Company Limited                      |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Pinghu Qun Yi Railway Store Loading and Unloading Company Limited   |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Nantie Construction Supervision Company Limited                     |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 76.66 | %
|Shenzhen Railway Property Management Company Limited                         |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Shenhuasheng Storage and Transportation Company Limited             |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Guangshen Railway Economic and Trade Enterprise Company Limited     |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Shenzhen Railway Station Passenger Services Company Limited                  |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Guangshen Railway Station Dongqun Trade and Commerce Service Company Limited |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Guangzhou Railway Huangpu Service Company Limited                            |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 100   | %
|Zengcheng Lihua Stock Company Limited                                        |  | PRC                     |  |                                          | 44.72 | %
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)

I, David T. Hung, M.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Medivation, Inc. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and
have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |                                                          
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 6, 2006
|                    | 
|                    |  | /S/    DAVID T. HUNG,
M.D.                               
|Name: Title:        |  | David T. Hung, M.D. President and Chief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

___________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 135787(79) Justices 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 135787 

v COA: 277905 

Wayne CC: 06-008116

LINCOLN WATKINS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension 

to September 11, 2008 of the time for filing their brief on appeal is considered and it is 

GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 25, 2008 

 Clerk
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2017/2006

of 20 December 2006         

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 as regards the catch limits for the stock of Norway pout in ICES zones IIa (EC waters), IIIa and IV (EC waters)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 of 22 December 2005 fixing for 2006 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (1), and in particular Article 5(7) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 2006.

For the Commission

Joe BORG            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 16, 20.1.2006, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1782/2006 (OJ L 345, 8.12.2006, p. 10).

(2)OJ L 229, 23.8.2006, p. 3.

----

ANNEX

Annex IA to Regulation (EC) No 51/2006 is amended as follows:

The entry concerning the stock of Norway pout in zones IIa (EC waters), IIIa and IV (EC waters) is replaced by the following:

----

(1)  This quota may be fished in Division VIa, North of 56° 30′ N.’         

----
Exhibit 5.1
 
 
  
       LLP
 By:
    
    /s/ D. Bradley Peck

      D. Bradley Peck
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 5251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01570]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Immune Mechanisms at the Maternal-
Fetal Interface (R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: February 28-29, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G54, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Hitendra S. Chand, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G54, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 627-3245, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 22, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01570 Filed 1-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
----

----

|   | (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      John      daCosta                                                      |   |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| John      daCostaChief      Executive OfficerDate:  May      15, 2009 |   |   |   |   |
<PAGE>

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1


Triad International Maintenance Corporation (Delaware)                      100%

       Timco Engineered Systems, Inc.                      100%

Brice Manufacturing Company, Inc. (California)                              100%

Aircraft Interior Design, Inc. (Florida)                                    100%

Timco Engine Center, Inc. (Delaware)                                        100%

Aviation Sales Distribution Services Company (Delaware)                     100%

Aviation Sales Leasing Company (Delaware)                                   100%

AVS/M-1, Inc. (Delaware)                                                    100%

AVS/M-2, Inc. (Delaware)                                                    100%

AVS/M-3, Inc. (Arizona)                                                     100%

AVS/CAI, Inc. (Florida)                                                     100%

TMAS/ASI, Inc. (Arkansas)                                                   100%

Aviation Sales Property Management Corp. (Delaware)                         100%

       AVSRE, LP (Delaware)                                1% GP interest

Whitehall Corporation (Delaware)                                            100%

       Hydroscience, Inc. (Texas)                          100%

       AVSRE, LP (Delaware)                                99% LP interest