alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Macreport.net, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, V.
William Lucchetti, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
----------------------------------
     V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
     Chief Executive Officer


April 15, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1899 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1899

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
          Entitled the ``Mollie Beattie Wilderness Area Act''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 702(3) of 
Public Law 96-487 is amended by striking ``Arctic National Wildlife 
Refuge Wilderness'' and inserting ``Mollie Beattie Wilderness''. The 
Secretary of the Interior is authorized to place a monument in honor of 
Mollie Beattie's contributions to fish, wildlife, and waterfowl 
conservation and management at a suitable location that he designates 
within the Mollie Beattie Wilderness.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
14910-13- 

## I

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 IDocket No. FAA-2010-XXXXX; Directorate Identifier 2010-SW-038-AD) RIN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthiness Directives; Apical Industries Inc. (Apical) Emergency }<'IoatKits AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration. DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This document proposes adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the Apical emergency float kits installed on certain model helicopters under supplemental type certificates. This proposal would require adding placards on each side ofthe f~uselageto identifythe location and operation ofthe liferaft external inflation handle. The proposal would also require replacing each liferaft operation placard to state that external liferafts are installed. This proposal isprompted by areport ofahelicopter that crashed into the water, and the pilot did not deploy the floats and liferafts. Two external T-handles were available for deployment ofthe Iiferafts but were not used bythe passengers because they were unaware oftheir location. The proposed actions are intended to prevent helicopter occupants from further injury due to unnecessary exposure to harsh water conditions and to aid indeploying liferafts when Iiferafts are available on the helicopter and can be activated after awatcr landing. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [insert date 60 days after date of publication inthc Fcderlll Register]. ADDRESSES: Use one ofthe following addresses to submit comments on this proposcd AD:

• Federal cRlIlcmaking Portal: Go to http://www.rel!lIlations.go\.. Follow the instructions for submitting comments
.

• Fax: 202-493-2251. ONCUlRDwCES 0\J1'1""(j S••..

~IBOt. ACO Egr

. I loU. Sly
\0 '2.1/tD Ot,.'11~G S,~IBOL


## /027--/0

1\11

" "-",',
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2026 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2026

   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to make uniform the 
 application of the overtime exemption for inside sales personnel, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

 Mr. Faircloth (for himself, Mrs. Kassebaum, Mr. Coats, Mr. Ashcroft, 
 Mr. DeWine, Mr. Frist, and Mr. Gorton) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to make uniform the 
 application of the overtime exemption for inside sales personnel, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNIFORM EXEMPTION.

    Section 7(i) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
207(i)) is amended by striking ``a retail or service establishment'' 
and inserting ``an establishment''.
                                 <all>
```
- 440 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

305 Nebraska Reports

REVEIZ v. EL-KASABY

Cite as 305 Neb. 440

Elena Reveiz, appellant, v. 

Bassel El-Kasaby, appellee.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed April 3, 2020. No. S-19-278.

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J 

Russell Derr, Judge. Affirmed.

Denise E. Frost, of Johnson & Mock, P.C., L.L.O., for 

appellant.

Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, and, on brief, Stacy L. Morris and 

Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for 

appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

The February 19, 2019, order of the Douglas County District 

Court is affirmed by an equally divided court.

Affirmed.

Papik, J., not participating.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

04/10/2020 08:07 AM CDT
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2104

To amend chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, to prohibit the use

of Federal funds for certain Federal employee labor organization activities, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 20), 1996

Mr. THURMOND (for himself, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr. LOTT, Mr. HELMS, and

Mrs. KASSEBAUM) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To amend chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code, to

prohibit the use of Federal funds for certain Federal

employee labor organization activities, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CER4 TAIN FEDERAL EMPLOYEE LABOR ORGANIZA5 TION ACTIVITIES.

6 (a) PAY OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.—Section 7131 of

7 title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding at the

8 end the following new subsection:
2

•S 2104 IS

1 ‘‘(e) An agency may not pay an employee for any pe2 riod of official time authorized under this section.’’.

3 (b) FACILITIES AND SUPPORT SERVICES.—Section

4 7135 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding

5 at the end the following new subsection:

6 ‘‘(c) An agency may not expend funds for facilities

7 or support services for any labor organization pursuant

8 to policies, regulations, or procedures referred to under

9 subsection (b).’’.

Æ
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 14, 

2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________ 

NO. 14-18-00293-CV

NO. 14-18-00294-CV

NO. 14-18-00295-CV

____________ 

IN THE INTEREST OF K.L.B. a/k/a K.L.M., A CHILD 

IN THE INTEREST OF K.J.M., A CHILD 

IN THE INTEREST OF N.D.D., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 246th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2013-00785, 2016-32301, and 2016-62702 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

These appeals are from judgments signed March 20, 2018. On June 5, 2018, 

appellant Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed motions to 

dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motions are granted and the 

appeals are dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Busby
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,742,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,158,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,241,797
<PP&E>                                     294,945,002
<DEPRECIATION>                            (59,136,652)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             738,427,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,000,916
<BONDS>                                    666,662,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,128,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               738,427,140
<SALES>                                    175,591,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           175,591,083
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              173,648,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (61,497,948)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (59,356,959)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (59,356,959)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (59,356,959)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1710

AN ACT

To authorize multiyear contracting for the C–17 aircraft

program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1710 ES

1 SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING AUTHORITY FOR

2 THE C–17 AIRCRAFT PROGRAM.

3 (a) MULTIYEAR CONTRACTS AUTHORIZED.—The

4 Secretary of the Air Force may, pursuant to section 2306b

5 of title 10, United States Code (except as provided in sub6 section (b)(1)), enter into one or more multiyear contracts

7 for the procurement of not more than a total of 80 C–

8 17 aircraft.

9 (b) CONTRACT PERIOD.—(1) Notwithstanding sec10 tion 2306b(k) of title 10, United States Code, the period

11 covered by a contract entered into on a multiyear basis

12 under the authority of subsection (a) may exceed five

13 years, but may not exceed seven years.

14 (2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as prohibit15 ing the Secretary of the Air Force from entering into a

16 multiyear contract for a period of less than seven years.

17 In determining to do so, the Secretary shall consider

18 whether—

19 (A) sufficient funding is provided for in the fu20 ture-years defense program for procurement, within

21 the shorter period, of the total number of aircraft to

22 be procured (within the number set forth in sub23 section (a)); and

24 (B) the contractor is capable of delivering that

25 total number of aircraft within the shorter period.
3

S 1710 ES

1 (c) OPTION TO CONVERT TO ONE-YEAR PROCURE2 MENTS.—Each multiyear contract for the procurement of

3 C–17 aircraft authorized by subsection (a) shall include

4 a clause that permits the Secretary of the Air Force—

5 (1) to terminate the contract as of September

6 30, 1998, without a modification in the price of each

7 aircraft and without incurring any obligation to pay

8 the contractor termination costs; and

9 (2) to then enter into follow-on one-year con10 tracts with the contractor for the procurement of C–

11 17 aircraft (within the total number of aircraft au12 thorized under subsection (a)) at a negotiated price

13 that is not to exceed the price that is negotiated be14 fore September 30, 1998, for the annual production

15 contract for the C–17 aircraft in lot VIII and subse16 quent lots.

Passed the Senate May 17, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1710

AN ACT

To authorize multiyear contracting for the C–17

aircraft program, and for other purposes.
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. Vincia RIVIERE; a/k/a Vincia Jno Baptiste Vincia Riviere, Appellant.

No. 02-1700.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) on Dec. 2, 2002.

Decided Jan. 31, 2003.

Before ROTH, SMITH, Circuit Judges, and CUDAHY,* Circuit Judge.

*

 Honorable Richard D. Cudahy, Circuit Court Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

OPINION

ROTH, Circuit Judge.

Vincia Riviere appeals the judgment of sentence of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. On November 13, 2001, Riviere pled guilty to one count of illegally reentering the country after having been deported for an aggravated felony conviction in Florida. On February 25, 2002, after denying Riviere’s objection to the criminal history calculation in the Presentence Report, the District Court sentenced her to 37 months imprisonment for violating 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2).

We have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(2). We review sentencing guideline calculations for plain error.

In her appeal, Riviere contends that the District Court erred in adding three points to her criminal history calculation for her prior Florida conviction. Riviere argues that the previous Florida conviction was rendered *in absentia,*violating her constitutional rights, and therefore is void.

This constitutional challenge to the Florida conviction was never made in the Florida courts. In *Custis v. United States,*511 U.S. 485, 114 S.Ct. 1732, 128 L.Ed.2d 517 (1994), the United States Supreme Court held that, with the sole exception of convictions obtained in violation of the right to counsel, a defendant in a federal sentencing proceeding has no right to collaterally attack the validity of previous state convictions that are used to enhance the federal sentence. *Id.*at 497, 114 S.Ct. 1732; *United States v. Escobales,*218 F.3d 259 (3d Cir.2000). For that reason, Riviere cannot now collaterally attack her Florida conviction which enhances her federal sentence here. If Riviere had wished to challenge the constitutionality of her Florida conviction, she had to do so in the Florida courts.

The District Court correctly applied U.S.S.G. § 4Al.l(a) when it added three criminal history points for Riviere’s prior conviction in Florida.

*103For the foregoing reason, we will affirm the judgment of the District Court.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


Certification of the Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002


10-Q




| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and                               
|
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.

|                      |  |                                                                                                                                                              
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2006 |  | /s/ Michael G. McGrathMichael G. McGrath
    Chief Financial Officer of Accenture Ltd,
    General Partner of Accenture SCA
    (principal financial officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2021 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 2, 2022


/s/Nicole SchaltenbrandNicole SchaltenbrandChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0646. MARCO JILES v. THE STATE.

In 2004, Marco Jiles was convicted of armed robbery and aggravated assault,

and this Court affirmed his convictions. Jiles v. State, Case No. A09A1511 (July 17,

2009). Several years later, this Court dismissed Jiles’s application for discretionary

appeal of the dismissal of his 2016 motion to vacate a void judgment. Jiles v. State,

Case No. A17D0318 (March 14, 2017). In December 2019, Jilesfiled another motion

seeking to vacate his sentence, arguing that the trial courtshould have sentenced him

to the mandatory minimum or less. The trial court dismissed the motion on February

28, 2020. Jilesfiled both an application for discretionary appeal and a notice of direct

appeal from that ruling. This Court denied the application for discretionary appeal.

See Case No. A20D0353 (denied April 16, 2020). We, therefore, lack jurisdiction

over this direct appeal.

Our denial of Jiles’s discretionary application constituted a decision on the

merits. See Elrod v. Sunflower Meadows Dev., LLC, 322 Ga. App. 666, 670 (4) (745

SE2d 846) (2013) (“[W]hen this Court examines a request for a discretionary appeal,

it acts in an error-correcting mode such that a denial of the application is on the

merits, and the order denying the application is res judicata with respect to the

substance of the requested review.”) (punctuation omitted). Thus, the doctrine of res

judicata bars this direct appeal from the same order. See Northwest Social & Civic

Club v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga.

App. 258, 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). This direct appeal is hereby DISMISSED

for lack of jurisdiction.

April 26, 2021
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/26/2021
Map Created: July 2018

Data Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, REIS, 2016

Per Capita Income Rates in Appalachia, 2016

(County Rates)

Per capita income is a measure of the total personal income of 

an area divided by the resident population of the area. The map 

uses natural breaks in the distribution to organize the data into 

groups of common values. 

0 50 100

Miles

GEORGIA

ALABAMA

MISSISSIPPI

SOUTH

CAROLINA

NORTH CAROLINA

VIRGINIA

WEST

VIRGINIA

KENTUCKY

OHIO ILLINOIS INDIANA

WISCONSIN

MICHIGAN

DE

NJ PENNSYLVANIA

MARYLAND

NEW YORK

TENNESSEE

$20,353 - $30,973

$30,974 - $35,909

$35,910 - $42,828

$42,829 - $58,369

Per Capita Income

U.S. average = $49,246

Appalachian average = $39,338

(Natural Breaks Classification)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1931 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1931

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To provide that the United States Post Office and Courthouse building 
 located at 9 East Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee, shall be known 
 and designated as the ``L. Clure Morton United States Post Office and 
                              Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF L. CLURE MORTON UNITED STATES POST OFFICE AND 
COURTHOUSE.
    The United States Post Office and Courthouse building located at 9 
East Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated 
as the ``L. Clure Morton United States Post Office and Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office and 
Courthouse building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``L. Clure Morton United States Post Office and 
Courthouse''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```