alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.10


                          ADDENDUM TO LEASE AGREEMENT

                       BETWEEN STOCKING WORKS ASSOCIATES

                                      and

                                 COLLAGENEXINC.


        THIS AGREEMENT, entered this day of 15 October, 1996, by and between
Stocking Works Associates, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership (hereinafter
"Landlord") and Collagenex Inc., a Delaware Corporation, (hereinafter "Tenant") 
provides:

        1. Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease Agreement dated September 5,
1995 ("the Lease Agreement") whereby Tenant would lease the third floor at 301
South State Street, Newtown, PA, for a period of one (1) year commencing on
January 1, 1996, and terminating on December 31, 1996.

        2. Tenant now wishes to extend said Lease Agreement for one additional
year commencing January 1, 1997 and terminating on December 31, 1997.

        3. Landlord hereby agrees to extend the term of said Lease Agreement as
set forth herein provided Tenant agrees to continue to be bound by the terms
and conditions set forth in the September 5, 1995 Lease Agreement.

        INTENDING to be legally bound hereby, and for good and valuable
consideration herein recited and otherwise paid, the parties hereto set their
hands and seals the first date above written:

WITNESS:                                 LANDLORD:
                                         Stocking Works Associates

                                         By:
-----------------------------               --------------------------------
                                                   Kenneth S. Sweet


                                         TENANT:
                                         Collagenex Inc.


/s/ Carol Nielsen                        By: /s/ Nancy C. Broadbent
-----------------------------                --------------------------------
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
S. 1995

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To authorize construction of the Smithsonian Institution National Air and Space

Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International Airport, and for other

purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF MUSEUM CENTER.

The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized to construct the Smithsonian Institution National Air and

Space Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International

Airport.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.

No appropriated funds may be used to pay any expense of

the construction authorized by section 1.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Fortis Enterprises (the "Company")
on  Form  10-QSB  for  the  period ended June 30, 2003,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Stephen  W.  Carnes, President and Chief Executive Officer  of  the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.



                              /S/Stephen W. Carnes
                              Stephen W. Carnes
                              President and Chief Executive Officer
                              August 5, 2003
**
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2018 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
Dated: February 6, 2019/s/ *Nicole Schaltenbrand*Nicole SchaltenbrandChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
62 

**
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **20 13**  **- 0637**  Docket Number
**20 13**  **- SW**  **- 030**  **- AD**  Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Sikorsky Aler

t Service Bulletin No. 76 - 65 - 62, dated December 14, 2004


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m . and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
#### Wayne Allen BERRY, Appellant, v. Leonard GRAVES, Appellee.

No. 02-2044.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 15, 2003.

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

Before LOKEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Allen Berry appeals the district court’s * denial of Berry’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas relief. Berry claims his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s alleged references to Berry’s post-arrest silence during closing argument. Having carefully reviewed the record, we believe the district court correctly agreed with the state court’s decision that the prosecutor’s comments did not violate Berry’s right to silence. Three of the prosecutor’s statements were permissible references to Berry’s pre-arrest silence. *Vick v. Lockhart,*952 F.2d 999, 1003 (8th Cir.1991). The prosecutor’s fourth statement, that Berry had “eighty-eight days ... in jail ... to concoct his story and make it look good when he gets up and testifies,” was not an impermissible reference to Berry’s post-arrest silence. *Catches v. United States,*582 F.2d 453, 458 (8th Cir.1978). Because the state court reasonably concluded that defense counsel’s failure to object to the prosecutor’s comments was not ineffective assistance, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

*

The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated October 29, 2007,accompanying i) the consolidated financial statements of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the three years in the period ended August 31, 2007; ii) management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. as of August 31, 2007; iii) the consolidated balance sheet of Energy Transfer Partners GP, L.P. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2007; andiv) the consolidated balance sheet of Energy Transfer Partners, L.L.C. and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2007, all included in the Annual Report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2007. Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-136429 and File No. 333-133176) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-146338).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

October 29, 2007
June 10, 2015

Mr. Joseph Barbre

Dear Mr. Barbre:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 11, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1298), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 31.2I, Diane L. Walker, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of LSB Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation and;  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting and;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors and theAudit Committee of registrant’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: August 11, 2006                                                            /s/ Diane L. Walker   Diane L. Walker   Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 12

FIRST REPUBLIC PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Merrill Lynch
Bank & Trust Co., FSB)

STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF

RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



|                                                  |  |                            |       |   |      |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | -
|                                                  |  | Three MonthsEndedMarch 31, |      
|($ in thousands)                                  |  | 2008                       |       |   | 2007 |  
|I.    Earnings:                                   |  |                            |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Net income                                        |  | $                          | 4,575 |   |      | $ | 4,917 |  
|Fixed charges excluding preferred stock dividends |  |                            |      |   |      |   |      |  
|                                                  |  |                            |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Earnings before fixed charges                     |  | $                          | 4,575 |   |      | $ | 4,917 |  
|                                                  |  |                            |       |   |      |   |       |  
|II.    Fixed charges:                             |  |                            |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Preferred stock dividends                         |  | $                          | 2,555 |   |      | $ | 3,563 |  
|                                                  |  |                            |       |   |      |   |       |  
|                                                  |  |                           
|III.  Ratios of earnings to fixed charges         |  |                            | 1.79  | x |      |   | 1.38  | x
|                                                  |  |                            |       |   |      |   |       |
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00386

- CV Barry BROOKS , Heston C. King , Stefen Brooks , and Jesse Benavides, Appellants

v. EXCELLENCE MORTGAGE, LTD. ; LATD

- 1, LLC ; Grothues Financial, LTD. ; Grothues Brothers Management I , LLC ; Georgetown Mortgage, LLC dba Excellence Mortgage and also d/b/a MG Mortgage ; MG Building Materials LTD. ; Grothues Brothers Management II, LLC ; and Larry E. Grothues , Appellees From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2010CI16915 Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 3 , 2018
DISMISSED Appellants Barry Brooks , Heston C. King, Stefen Douglas Brooks, and Jesse Rodriguez
Benavides filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion states the parties have settled all matters in dispute among them

. Appellants certified they served the motion on Appellees; Appellees have not filed any response to oppos e the motion.04

- 18

- 00386

- CV

- 2

- Appellant s ’ motion to dismiss this appeal is granted; this appeal is dismissed. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f); Caballero v. Heart of Tex

. Pizza, L.L.C. , 70 S.W.3d 180, 181 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2001, no pet.) (en banc) (per curiam).
PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.1

Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2010 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Report), we, John A. B. Davies, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, and Neal A. Petrovich, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(a) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John A. B. Davies, Jr.John A. B. Davies, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 17, 2010/s/ Neal A. PetrovichNeal A. PetrovichChief Financial OfficerDate: May 17, 2010




46
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,742,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,158,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,270,277
<PP&E>                                     294,945,002
<DEPRECIATION>                            (59,136,652)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             736,369,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       36,978,481
<BONDS>                                    571,325,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 113,430,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               736,369,805
<SALES>                                    175,591,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           175,591,083
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              173,648,636
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (49,080,679)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (46,949,074)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (46,949,074)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (46,949,074)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1884

To provide a penalty of not less than ten years’ imprisonment without release

for damage by arson to houses of worship.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 18, 1996

Mr. GRAMM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide a penalty of not less than ten years’ imprisonment

without release for damage by arson to houses of worship.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PUNISHMENT FOR ARSON; OBSTRUCTION OF

4 PERSONS IN THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELI5 GIOUS BELIEFS.

6 Section 247(c)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is

7 amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(2) if bodily injury results from the acts com9 mitted in violation of this section or if such acts in10 clude the use, attempted use, or threatened use of
2

S 1884 IS

1 a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, a fine in ac2 cordance with this title and imprisonment for not

3 less than ten years, or both; and’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  DUPONT PHOTOMASKS, INC.

I,
Marshall C. Turner, Chief Executive Officer of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

/s/
MARSHALL C. TURNER
Marshall C. Turner
Chief Executive Officer

Date:
September 9, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and will be retained by DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

I,
Satish Rishi, Chief Financial Officer of DuPont Photomasks, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, in connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:

/s/
SATISH RISHI
Satish Rishi
Chief Financial Officer

Date:
September 9, 2004

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and will be retained by DuPont Photomasks, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks