alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 31, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00804

- CR

Kaitlyn Lucretia Ritcherson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURY EAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudicat ion of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1995 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1995

 To authorize construction of the Smithsonian Institution National Air 
   and Space Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International 
                    Airport, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 1996

Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Ford, Mr. Robb, Mr. Moynihan, Mr. Simpson, 
 Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Glenn) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize construction of the Smithsonian Institution National Air 
   and Space Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International 
                    Airport, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF MUSEUM CENTER.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to construct the Smithsonian Institution National Air and Space Museum 
Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International Airport.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.

    No appropriated funds may be used to pay any expense of the 
construction authorized by section 1.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2


                  Certification of Principal Accounting Officer
            Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

            I, Douglas B. Croxall, Principal Accounting Officer of AFG
Enterprises USA, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

            1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;

            2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

            4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and I have:

            a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

            c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 14, 2006             /s/Douglas B. Croxall
                                ---------------------
                                Douglas B. Croxall, Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>



March 19, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporate Finance
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, DC 20549

     Re:  Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X
          BayCorp Holdings, Ltd.
          2001 10-K filed on March 25, 2002
          Commission File No. 0-12527
          ------------------------------------------------

Dear Sir or Madam:

     Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X as promulgated
by the Commission, Baycorp Holdings, Ltd. states herewith that as of March 19,
2002, Arthur Andersen has represented to BayCorp that the 2001 audit was subject
to Arthur Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of
Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national
office consultation to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.




                                  Very truly yours,

                                  /s/ Frank W. Getman Jr.

                                  Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                  President
                                  Chief Executive Officer
Honeywell 

101 Columbia Road

Morristown, NJ 07962

Ms. Drusilla Hufford

Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

MC 6205J

Washington, DC 20460

June 22, 2011

Subject: SNAP EPA-HQ-OAR 2008-0664 HFO-1234yf LGWP MAC Refrigerant Industrial Transfer

Dear Drusilla

It was nice to meet your team last week, thanks to all for taking time to discuss commercial introduction of 

HFO-1234yf refrigerant for mobile air conditioning. The pace towards full production is rapidly accelerating 

as we look to support our MAC customers around the globe. Expedient movement of the refrigerant to the 

various global regions is critical the operation of our business and the successful implementation of this new 

lower global warming refrigerant.

We need to move HFO-1234yf today for industrial transfers but vitally need EPA non-objection to allow use 

of other than the SAE J2844 service cylinder fitting. We would appreciate your agreement with our 

interpretation that such shipments would not conflict with the intent of the SNAP ruling. Honeywell needs to 

move material immediately both internal inventory transfers and to support customer production activities. 

These shipments are not for “professional service or service for consideration” usage. 

During our discussion we briefly addressed HFO-1234yf SNAP Final Rule EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0664 and the 

SAE J2844 quick connect fitting standard referencing professional service cylinder fittings. From our 

discussion, it is our understanding that the SNAP reference relates to “professional service or service for 

consideration” when identifying a specific fitting. Therefore, any industrial transfer either internal to 

Honeywell or to a non-professional service usage would be excluded from the fitting requirement. It is this 

last point that we need immediate clarification to allow movement of refrigerant.

Please provide a response indicating your agreement with our desire to utilize standard industry fillings for 

material transfers for industrial usage. 

Thank you for your assistance, I look forward to your feedback. As we discussed at the meeting, please 

communicate directly with me at Steven.Bernhardt@Honeywell.com or (973) 455-6294.

Thanks,

Steven H. Bernhardt, PhD

Global Director Regulatory Affairs

Honeywell International

101 Columbia Road, NIC-5

Morristown, NJ 07962

cc. Cindy Newberg

 Margaret Sheppard 

 Yaidi Cancel
#### James E. LANDRUM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W.F. DALIUS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-6637.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

James E. Landrum, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

James E. Landrum, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Landrum v. Dalius,*No. CA-02-160-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 14, 2002; entered Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6236]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                HONORING OUTSTANDING ATHLETE STEVEN FOX

  (Mr. FLEISCHMANN asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mr. FLEISCHMANN. Mr. Speaker, I rise today to honor an outstanding 
student athlete from the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. 
Competing at the U.S. Amateur Championship in Colorado, UTC student 
Steven Fox came from behind to win the first USGA Championship for the 
University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
  Down by two holes on the par 5 17th hole, Steven made a clutch birdie 
and managed to make a great par on the final hole, putting the match 
into sudden death after 36 grueling holes. At the first playoff hole, 
Steven sank a critical 18-foot putt to secure his victory. Steven's 
victory is an inspiration to the entire UTC community and, indeed, to 
all Tennesseans.
  No mention of this victory is complete without mentioning the great 
UTC golf team, which has achieved national success under the leadership 
of Coach Mark Guhne. Thanks to his hard work and the support of former 
Athletic Director Steve Sloan and Chancellor Roger Brown, UTC qualified 
for this past year's NCAA championship in Los Angeles.
  On behalf of all east Tennesseans, I extend my congratulations to 
Steven Fox. I look forward to watching him roam the fairways at Augusta 
National soon. I also look forward to many future successes at UTC.
  Go Mocs!

                          ____________________
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21


            SUBSIDIARIES OF CENTRAL FINANCIAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION



Central Check Cashing, Inc., a California corporation

Central Installment Credit
Corporation, a California corporation

Central Consumer Finance
Company, a Delaware corporation

Centravel, Inc., a California corporation

Central Financial
Acceptance/Insurance Agency, a California corporation

Central Premium Finance
Company, a California corporation

BCE Properties, Inc., a California corporation

Central Consumer Company of
Nevada, a Nevada corporation

CALPLAN Travel Corporation, a California corporation

C.E.A. Acquisition Corporation, a California corporation

BTT Corporation, a California corporation

C.E.A. Travel Corporation, a California corporation

Central Finance Reinsurance, Ltd., a Turks & Caicos, British
  West Indies entity

Central Financial Acceptance
Corporation Accident & Health
Reinsurance Limited, a Turks & Caicos, British
  West Indies entity

Central Income Tax Services, Inc., a California corporation
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1946

To amend title 18, United States Code, to insert a general provision for

criminal attempt.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 11, 1996

Mr. DEWINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18, United States Code, to insert a general

provision for criminal attempt.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CRIMINAL ATTEMPT.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 18, United

5 States Code, is amended by inserting before section 2 the

6 following:

7 ‘‘§ 1. Criminal attempt

8 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—A person is guilty of an offense if,

9 acting with the state of mind otherwise required for the

10 commission of a crime, that person intentionally engages
2

•S 1946 IS

1 in conduct that, if successful, would constitute or result

2 in the offense.

3 ‘‘(b) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE.—It is an affirmative

4 defense to a prosecution under this section that, under cir5 cumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunci6 ation of criminal intent, the defendant avoided the com7 mission of the crime attempted by abandoning any crimi8 nal effort and, if mere abandonment was insufficient to

9 accomplish such avoidance, by taking affirmative steps

10 that prevented the commission of the crime.

11 ‘‘(c) DEFENSE PRECLUDED.—It is not a defense to

12 a prosecution under this section—

13 ‘‘(1) that it was factually or legally impossible

14 for the actor to commit the crime, if the crime could

15 have been committed had the circumstances been as

16 the actor believed them to be; or

17 ‘‘(2) that the crime attempted was completed.

18 ‘‘(d) PROOF.—In a prosecution under this section,

19 any special proof provision that is specified in this title

20 as applicable to the crime attempted is applicable also to

21 an offense described in this section, unless a different ap22 plication is plainly required.

23 ‘‘(e) GRADING.—An offense described in this section

24 is an offense of the next lesser degree than the offense

25 attempted.
3

•S 1946 IS

1 ‘‘(f) JURISDICTION.—There is Federal jurisdiction

2 over an offense described in this section if the crime at3 tempted is a Federal crime with regard to which Federal

4 jurisdiction—

5 ‘‘(1) is not limited to certain specified cir6 cumstances; or

7 ‘‘(2) is limited to certain specified cir8 cumstances and any such circumstance exists or has

9 occurred, or would exist or occur if the course of

10 conduct involving the crime were completed.’’.

11 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for

12 chapter 1 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by

13 striking the item relating to section 1 and inserting the

14 following:

‘‘1. Criminal attempt.’’.

Æ
HELINET																			16303	Waterman	Drive,	Van	Nuys,	CA		91406 +1	818	902	0229 info@helinet.com HELINET.COM February 11 , 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. , SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re

. Petition to Amend FAA Exemption No. 11160 (the “Exemption”)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Helinet Aviation Services, LLC , hereby requests approva l to amend the Exemption to permit Helinet

to operate an additional model of UAS

– the Shotover U1

.

On Feb ruary 2, 2015, the FAA issued the Exemption to Helinet to utilize th e DJI S1000 and Gryphon

Dynamics X8 UAS for motion picture and television filming.

Helinet’s amended Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) is being submitted separately

pursuant to 14 CFR §11.35(b). Section 6 of the FOPM c ontains the proposed amendment.

All UAS operations will continue to fully adhere to the conditions of the Exemption and all operations

will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

Thank you for your consideration of our request.

If you h ave any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at 818.902.0229.

Sincerely yours,

Jack Snyder

Vice President and General Counsel

Helinet Aviation Services, LLC
FILED
                                                                    JULY 7, 2000


                                   Exhibit 3.3
                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                SICKBAY.COM, INC.

TO:  The Division of Corporations And
     Commercial Code
     State of Utah

     The UNDERSIGNED certify that:

     1.   They are the President and the Secretary, of Sickbay.com, Inc., a Utah
          corporation (the "Corporation") respectively.

     2.   Article I of the Corporation's Articles shall be and of Incorporation
          is hereby amended to read as follows;

          The name of the Corporation shall be "Sickbay Health Media, Inc."

     3.   The amendment described in paragraph "2" above was adopted by the
          Corporation's stockholders at a Special Meeting of Stockholders held
          on June 12, 2000.

     4.   The number of shares issued and outstanding and eligible to vote on
          the amendment described in paragraph "2" above on June 12, 2000, the
          record date, was 22,700,000 shares of Common Stock.

     5.   Stockholders owning 18,000,000 shares of Common Stock voted in favor
          of the amendment described in paragraph "2" above,

     6.   The shares which were voted in favor of all amendments represent a
          majority of the issued and outstanding shares of every class of the
          Corporation's stock entitled as of the date of such meeting to vote on
          this Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation.

     7.   The undersigned, Allen Motola, President of the Corporation, and Mark
          Basile, Secretary of the Corporation, each hold 9,000,000 of the said
          shares (18,000,000 in the aggregate) representing a majority of the
          shares issued and outstanding and they have, and do by their
          signatures hereunder confirm their, consent to this Amendment to the
          Articles of Incorporation.


<PAGE>


Dated: June 12, 2000

                                              S/Allen Motola
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Allen Motola
                                              President of the Corporation


                                              S/Mark Basile
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Mark Basile
                                              Secretary of the Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations of United Payors &
United Providers, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998 
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998 
<CASH>                                     27,510,647 
<SECURITIES>                                3,855,195 
<RECEIVABLES>                              12,729,631 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0 
<INVENTORY>                                         0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           46,537,548 
<PP&E>                                      7,035,747 
<DEPRECIATION>                            (2,733,803) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            115,944,999 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      19,390,615 
<BONDS>                                    17,022,738 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                         0 
<COMMON>                                   34,663,001 
<OTHER-SE>                                 43,795,312 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              115,944,999 
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           78,449,319 
<CGS>                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              45,917,439 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,105,375 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            33,261,150 
<INCOME-TAX>                               13,682,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        19,579,150 
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                               19,579,150 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.15 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.09 
        



</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134747 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134747 

 COA: 267263 

Saginaw CC: 05-025682-FC 

QUENTON JAUNELL DEBERRY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 24, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1648 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1648

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel HERCO 
                                 TYME.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That notwithstanding 
sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, United States Code, and 
section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), as 
applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel HERCO TYME (United States official number 911599).

            Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1648

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
  documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel HERCO 
                                 TYME.
```