alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of PFS Bancorp, Inc. (the "Registrant")
hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                  /s/Mel E. Green
                                  -------------------------------------
                                  Name: Mel E. Green
                                  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 15, 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PFS Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by PFS Bancorp, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1740

To define and protect the institution of marriage.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 8, 1996

Mr. NICKLES (for himself and Mr. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To define and protect the institution of marriage.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defense of Marriage

5 Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. POWERS RESERVED TO THE STATES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 115 of title 28, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding after section 1738B

9 the following:
2

•S 1740 IS

1 ‘‘§ 1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and

2 the effect thereof

3 ‘‘No State, territory, or possession of the United

4 States, or Indian tribe, shall be required to give effect to

5 any public act, record, or judicial proceeding of any other

6 State, territory, possession, or tribe respecting a relation7 ship between persons of the same sex that is treated as

8 a marriage under the laws of such other State, territory,

9 possession, or tribe, or a right or claim arising from such

10 relationship.’’.

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

12 at the beginning of chapter 115 of title 28, United States

13 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

14 section 1738B the following new item:

‘‘1738C. Certain acts, records, and proceedings and the effect thereof.’’.

15 SEC. 3. DEFINITION OF MARRIAGE.

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United

17 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow18 ing:

19 ‘‘§ 7. Definition of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’

20 ‘‘In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress,

21 or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the var22 ious administrative bureaus and agencies of the United

23 States, the word ‘marriage’ means only a legal union be24 tween one man and one woman as husband and wife, and
3

•S 1740 IS

1 the word ‘spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite

2 sex who is a husband or a wife.’’.

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

4 at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 1, United States

5 Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to

6 section 6 the following new item:

‘‘7. Definition of ‘marriage’ and ‘spouse’.’’.

Æ
MRI Industry: Review of Proposed 

Accessibility Standards

U.S. Access Board

May 8, 2012

Atlanta, Georgia

Milind Dhamankar MD

Siemens Healthcare

Sr. Director Product Marketing
65 %

N

S

Hydrogen protonsMR Physics Made Easy Computer to reconstruct images

Magnet

MRI is Complex

65 %

H2O

Radio Frequency energy

Magnet

Installation needs a RF cabin
Ferrous materials within magnet room is a hazard!

Oxygen cylinder 

IV pole
Proposed requirements

 M301.2

 M305.2

 M301.4

Current Abilities

 MRIs designed to effectively 

image patients of all ages and 

sizes (up to table weight 

capacity/bore size)

 “MRI conditional” wheel-chair, 

Chapter M3: MRI

 M301.4  “MRI conditional” wheel-chair, 

transport trolley, patient 

transport shells are available

 For MRI – Free standing 

overhead track lifts may be 

challenging due to the 

magnet, but MR compatible 

lifts possible.
Proposed requirements

 M301.2

 M305.2

 M301.4

Current Abilities

 MRI table tops have patient 

positioning cushions, safety 

straps, side rails, iv stand 

holders and emergency pull–

out mechanisms

Chapter M3: MRI

 M301.4 out mechanisms

 Newer high-density, ultra-light 

coils come in all sizes ranging 

from extra-small loop coils to 

XXL body coils.

Positioning cushions 

MRI coils 
Patient Communication

Advisory M306.1 

Proposed requirements

 M306.1

– Improvement in patient 

Current Abilities

 Current MR systems comply 

– with this requirement Improvement in patient 

communication during MRI 

exam

 Patient communication unit

– Intercom communication with 

the patient

– Patient alert system 

(squeeze-bulb)

 No radiation in MRI allows 

presence of patient relative / 

help next to the patient to 

coordinate tactile 

communication
Moving Forward

• MRI manufacturers are committed to providing medical 

device access for all patients and are thankful for the 

opportunity to participate in standards development with 

the United States Access Board.

Thank You
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon D. Browning, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ Gordon D. Browning                              
|Gordon D. Browning                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 5, 2008
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1865 Prepped byCharmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 116)IV-K-(B)-1 1 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 12/3/20083:22:18PM

Sheet 116 of 198P. 2 

# -83-27

e*-t 

## 'ENERG YAND ENVIRONMENTA LANALYSIS , INC . 165 5 NORT

H FORTMYE

RDRIV EARLINGTON , VIRGINI A2220 9 703/528-190 0 IV-K-(B )

January6 , 198 7

Mr . Rober t Pahel-Shor t Economi c Analysi s Branc h(MD-12 ) U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolina 2771 1 Subject : EP

AContrac t No . 68-02-4202 , Wor k Assignmen t No . 1 8 Industria l Fue l Price s Dea r Robert : The enclose d tabl e summarize s industria l oi l an d ga s price s fo r th e Southwest , Federa l regio n 6 . Theyar e expresse d a s after-tax ne t presen t values . Thes e parameter s wer e use d i n IFCA M run s conducte d in Septembe r an

d Octobe r 198 6 and ar e base d o n EEA' s 198 6 industria l oi l an d ga s pric e projections . Sincerely , /yC^\ 

### r-r-rjjto^ Ti mHoga n TH:ds s Enclosur e CC : Dr . A . Weh e

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMIC S / ENGINEERIN GP. 3

PROJECTE D INDUSTRIA L FUE L PRICE S FOR TH E SOUTHWEST ? (198 5 $/MMBtu )

HighOi l Price s Lo wOi l Price s 3.0 % S residua l fue l oi l 1.6 % S residua l fue l oi l 0.8 % S residua l fue l oi l 0.3 % S residua l fue l oi l Distillat e fue l oi l Natura l ga s 15.2 9 16.0 6 17.2 9 17.9 0 20.4 3 14.7 4 

### 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 4 1 1 4 5 1 4 1 3 6 2 2 6 1 6

a Federa l regio n 6 . After-tax ne t presen t value s use d i n IFCAM . Base d o n a ta xrat e o f 5 0 percent , 8 percen t rea l after-tax discoun t rate , an d a 1 5 yea r perio d (beginning i n 198 7 wit ha two-yea r constructio n perio d an d 1 3 year s o f operation , 1989-2001) .
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00341

- CR

Cameron Thomas Fountain

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1322169D)

June 11, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordere d that the appeal is dismissed

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

_______________ Justice Bonnie Sudderth
SERVE D MARC H 2 , 201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S D?P T O:" T^'•:'-FGBWIO

N WASHINGTON , D C D o
I N TH EMATTE RO F TREVO RMILLE R FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP09SW000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO
. FAA-2009-073 5
ORDE RO FCHIE FADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDG ECORRECTIN GTRANSCRIP T B y motio n serve dDecembe r 1 , 2009 , Responden t

seek s t o correc t

th e transcrip t

o f th e Prehearin g Telephon e Conferenc e hel dNovembe r 5 , 2009
. Absen t

objectio n an dbase do n examinatio n o f

th e audi o file that

accompanie dth e transcript , th e motio n i s grante dt o th e exten t indicate dbelow , an dth e followin g correction s ar e hereb y mad e i n th e above-describe d transcript
. PAG E 4 2 4 2 4 7 6 7 LIN E

8 9 1 6 1 1 READ S

said ? I mean t Jun e ou t o f service , a s hadtake n SHOUL D REA D said ? I meant . . . Jun e that stewardes s that can tak e S O ORDERED
.

""Roi^i e A
. Yode r Chie f Administrativ e L a Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09SW000 4 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1.000 '

ON ECOP Y Trevo r Miller , Responden t 231 9 Sundanc e Driv e O'Fallon , M O 6336 8 TEL : 314-497-360 2 Yoland aA
. Bemal , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Southwes t

Regio n 260 1 MeachamBlvd
. For t Worth , TX 7613 7 TEL : 817-222-507 0 FAX : 817-222-594 5 Th e Honorabl e Ronni e A
. Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo r servic e in perso n o r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federal Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suite 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
. - 2 -
Order entered December 2 9 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 16
- 01453
- CV
IN RE ETHAN JEREMY H AZELTON, Relator Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial Distr ict Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380
- 55640
- 2013


### O RDER Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY AS MOOT relator’s December 13, 2016 petition for writ of habeas corpus, and we VACATE the deadlines for filing responses to the p etition and for filing the reporter’s record.
We further DISCHARGE the bond paid by relator in accordance with this Court’s order of December 13, 2016.
We ORDER that relator recover the costs of this original proceeding from real party in
interest Katie Bl iss Hazelton.
/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-85896) and Forms S-8 (File No. 33-78592,
File No. 333-69913, File No. 333-79445 and File No. 333-37912), of D&E
Communications, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2002, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of D&E
Communications, Inc. and the financial statements of D&E/Omnipoint Wireless
Joint Venture, L.P. which appear in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2002
KEITH ANDREW JACKSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 4518

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed April 4, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

. Keith Andrew Jackson, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See, e.g.

, Hall v. State , 117 So. 3d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)

(dis mis sing appeal from order denying request for final disposition of violation of

probation allegations and concluding that no other appellate or extraordinary

remedy is available to appellant).

LEWIS, THOMAS, and MAKAR, J J

. , CONCUR.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, S. Bradford Antle, the ChiefExecutive Officer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed thiscertification in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJuly 1, 2006 (the “Report”).  Theundersigned hereby certifies that:

(1)           the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| August 9, 2006 | SI INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|----------------|------------------------|
|           |                   |
|           |                   | /s/ S. Bradford  Antle |   |
|           |                   | S. Bradford  Antle |
|           |                   | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Thomas E. Dunn, the Chief FinancialOfficer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed thiscertification in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJuly 1, 2006 (the “Report”).  Theundersigned hereby certifies that:

(1)           the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| August 9, 2006 | SI INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|----------------|------------------------|
|           |                   |
|           |                   | /s/ Thomas E. Dunn |   |
|           |                   | Thomas E. Dunn |
|           |                   | Executive Vice  President, |
|           |                   | Chief Financial  Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the
date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently
herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 30, 2014



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David Gladstone    
|David Gladstone        
|Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 5, 2019

a0329

Order 

Clerk

April 5, 2019

154808

SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN SURGICAL

HOSPITAL, LLC, d/b/a SOUTHEAST

MICHIGAN SURGICAL HOSPITAL

and JAMIE LETKEMANN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 154808

COA: 323425

Wayne CC: 11-015300-NF

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________________________/

By order of May 17, 2017, the application for leave to appeal the August 9, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Bazzi v 

Sentinel Ins Co (Docket No. 154442). On order of the Court, the case having been 

decided on July 18, 2018, 502 Mich 390 (2018), the application is again considered. 

Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case 

to the Court of Appeals to address: (1) whether the published opinion in this case is 

consistent with the published opinion in Baker v Marshall, 323 Mich App 590 (2018), lv 

den 503 Mich 861 (2018), and, if not, (2) the impact of MCR 7.215(J)(1) on the two 

opinions and, if necessary, (3) for reconsideration in light of Bazzi. In all other respects, 

leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1995 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1995

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To authorize construction of the Smithsonian Institution National Air 
   and Space Museum Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International 
                    Airport, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF MUSEUM CENTER.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to construct the Smithsonian Institution National Air and Space Museum 
Dulles Center at Washington Dulles International Airport.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON USE OF FUNDS.

    No appropriated funds may be used to pay any expense of the 
construction authorized by section 1.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6851

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENT GRIFFIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (CR-01-26)

Submitted: October 18, 2005 Decided: October 21, 2005

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kent Griffin, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kent Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion under the All Writs Act. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Griffin, No. CR-01-26 (E.D. Va. filed May 13, 2005 & entered

May 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 99



                             EVERGREENBANCORP, INC.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 previously filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 12, 2002, and as amended by this
Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1 (the "Report"), we, Gerald O. Hatler, Chief
Executive Officer, and William G. Filer II, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/  GERALD O. HATLER                        /s/ WILLIAM G. FILER II
-----------------------------------          -----------------------------------
Gerald O. Hatler                             William G. Filer II
Chief Executive Officer                      Chief Financial Officer
September 10, 2002                           September 10, 2002