alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Subject: FW: question re: Eur Resp J 2012 paper -for NOx docket

Attachments: Two pollutants.xlsx

From: Pedro Martins [mailto:pmartinsalergo@gmail.com] 

Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:48 PM 

To: Patel, Molini 

Subject: Re: question re: Eur Resp J 2012 paper 

Dear Prof. Molini Patel, 

Thank you for your e-mail. I've prepared a file with the information you requested. 

I hope you find it useful. If you need further information, please let me know. 

Best regards, 

Pedro Martins 

- 

Pedro Martins, MD, PhD 

Immunoallergy Department, Dona Estefânia Hospital, Central Lisbon Hospital EPE, Portugal 

CEDOC - Chronic Diseases Research Center, Pathophysiology Department, Nova Medical School, New 

University of Lisbon, Portugal 

On 27 June 2013 17:38, Patel, Molini <Patel.Molini@epa.gov> wrote: 

Dear Dr. Martins, 

Our office is currently developing the Integrated Science Assessment for Nitrogen Oxides and reviewing your 

2012 paper in the European Respiratory Journal, “Airways changes related to air pollution exposure in 

wheezing children.” We are interested in the two-pollutant modeling results you reported in the supplementary 

material (Figures 1s and 2s) and hope that you would share with us the quantitative results (effect estimates and 

95% CIs) for FEV1 and pH for NO2, PM10, benzene, and ethylbenzene. Thank you! 

Best regards, 

 

Molini M. Patel, PhD, MPH 

Epidemiologist 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

National Center for Environmental Assessment 

Mailcode: B243-01 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919.541.1492, Fax: 919.541.1818, Email: patel.molini@epa.gov

 
Two pollutants.xlsx

FEV1

PM10 (single) PM10 (+NO2) PM10 (+Benzene) PM10 (+Ethilbenzene)

Regression coefficient (CI 95%) -1.64(-3.2 to -0.1) 0.47(-4.36 to 5.3) 0.46(-2.49 to 1.58) -1.4(-3.6 to 0.79)

NO2 (single) NO2 (+PM10) NO2 (+Benzene) NO2 (+Ethilbenzene)

Regression coefficient (CI 95%) -11.87(-6.31 to -0.76) -25.6(-8.18 to 9.21) -8.65(-0.97 to 6.7) -13.21(-4.83 to 3.56)

Benzene (single) Benzene (+PM10) Benzene (+NO2) Benzene (+Ethilbenzene)

Regression coefficient (CI 95%) -4.33(-7.13 to -1.53) -3.76(-7.37 to -0.15) -3.98(-7.71 to -0.23) -4.22(-7.83 to -0.61)

Ethilbenzene (single) Ethilbenzene (+PM10) Ethilbenzene (+NO2) Ethilbenzene (+Benzene)

Regression coefficient (CI 95%) -1.79(-3.32 to -0.25) -0.6 (-2.67 to 1.48) -0.61 (-2.78 to 1.56) -0.06 (-1.99 to 1.86)

pH

PM10 (single) PM10 (+NO2) PM10 (+Benzene) PM10 (+Ethilbenzene)

Regression coefficient (CI 95%) -0.21 (-0.3 to 0.12) -0.23 (-0.48 to 0.01) -0.14 (-0.27 to -0.01) -0.14 (-0.28 to 0.003)

NO2 (single) NO2 (+PM10) NO2 (+Benzene) NO2 (+Ethilbenzene)

Regression coefficient (CI 95%) -0.69 (-1.04 to -0.35) 0.08 (-0.8 to 0.97) -0.44 (-0.95 to 0.06) -042(-0.97 to 0.12)

Benzene (single) Benzene (+PM10) Benzene (+NO2) Benzene (+Ethilbenzene)

Regression coefficient (CI 95%) -0.24 (-0.42 to -0.06) -0.08 (-0.32 to 0.15) -0.1 (-0.34 to 0.14) -0.09 (-0.22 to 0.04)

Ethilbenzene (single) Ethilbenzene (+PM10) Ethilbenzene (+NO2) Ethilbenzene (+Benzene)

Regression coefficient (CI 95%) -0.14 (-0.23 to -0.04) -0.04 (-0.18 to 0.09) -0.06 (-0.20 to 0.09) -0.13 (-0.37 to 0.10)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANDRE MILES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-2929

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 8, 2019. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas

County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Tim Bower Rodriguez of Tim Bower

Rodriguez, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. 

Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, 

Tampa, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1


                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of PFS Bancorp, Inc. (the "Registrant")
hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                   /s/ Mel E. Green
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Mel E. Green
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  August 11, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PFS Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by PFS Bancorp, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-11643, 333-11671, 333-20695 and 333-64309 of Suburban Lodges of America,
Inc., on Form S-8 of our report dated February 22, 2002 (which report expresses
an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
merger agreement), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Suburban
Lodges of America, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE

Atlanta, Georgia

April 1, 2002
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In re the Complaint of 

THE FLIGHT SHOP, INC. D/B/A PROFESSIONAL AIR, 

and AERO FACILITIES, LLC 

Complainants, 

against 

CITY OF BEND, OREGON-MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 

Respondent. 

Pursuant to Part 16 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

ERRATA ORDER 

Docket No. 16-14-12 

On February 11, Complainants THE FLIGHT SHOP, INC. D/B/A PROFESSIONAL 

AIR, and AERO FACILITIES, LLC pursuant to 14 CFR §16.11, filed an unopposed 

motion seeking an extension of time until March 9, in which to file their responsive 

Reply to the Respondent's Answer and its opposition to Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 

and for Summary Judgment. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 

Complainants Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time is Granted. 

Complainants may file their Reply on or before March 9, 2015. 

Respondent is also granted a 20 days extension in which to file its rebuttal, i.e., the 

rebuttal is due within 30 days of the date of service of the complainants' reply. 

Randall S. Fiertz 

Director of Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on/1 htch Z7 , 2015, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the FAA's Request for 

Additional Information and Notice of Extension of Time, addressed to: 

Mr. Pablo Niiesch, Attorney for City of Bend 

Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 

1875 Eye Street, NW 

Suite 700 

Washlngton, DC 20006 

Mr. Robert Franz, Jr., Attorney for City of Bend 

Law Office of Robert E. Franz Jr. 

730 B St 

Springfield, OR 97477 

Gary Firestone, City Attorney 

City of Bend 

City Hall, 710 NW Wall Street 

P.O. Box 431 

Bend, OR 97709 

Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. 

McBreen & Kopko 

Attorneys for Complainants 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, New York 11753 

lkirsch@mklawnyc.com 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Proceedings Docket 

Office of Airport Compliance, AC0-1 00 

laudm Roberts • .. 

Office of Airport Compliance and 

Management Analysis 

2
**Exhibit23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.333-41905 and No. 333-68636) of National R.V. Holdings, Inc. of our reportdated March 27, 2006, which appears in this Form 10-K, relating to theconsolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| /s/ Swenson Advisors,  LLP |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
| San Diego, California      |
| March 28, 2006             |

 

----
Exhibit 3.72
 EXHIBIT A
  
   Registered Office.
 Other Offices.
   Time and Place of Meetings
 Annual Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice




---



##### 



Quorum
 Voting.
 Method of Voting
 Action Without Meeting
 2




---



##### 



Responsibilities.
 Number; Term
 Vacancies; Increases
 Place of meetings
 3




---



##### 



Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Quorum; Majority Vote
 Minutes.
 Committee
 Committee Minutes
 Action Without Meeting
 4




---



##### 



Method
 Waiver.
   Number
 5




---



##### 



Appointed Officers
 Removal
 Compensation
 Duties
       6




---



##### 



Checks
 Fiscal Year
 Telephone and Similar Meetings
 Distributions and Share Dividends
 Amendment of Bylaws
 7
Oct 30, 2012 Email from Tuyet-le Pham (SCAQMD) to LaWeeda Ward (EPA) 

Fw: VOC Emissions Inventory for R1127

Nancy Levin to: Nancy Levin 01/03/2013 02:57 PM

----- Forwarded by Nancy Levin/R9/USEPA/US on 01/03/2013 02:56 PM -----

----- Forwarded by LaWeeda Ward/R9/USEPA/US on 11/30/2012 01:35 PM -----

From: Tuyet-le Pham <TPham@aqmd.gov>

To: LaWeeda Ward/R9/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Tracy Goss <TGoss@aqmd.gov>

Date: 11/30/2012 10:12 AM

Subject: RE: VOC Emissions Inventory for R1127

La Weeda:

Attached please find the Rule 1127 VOC baseline emissions and projected reductions with and 

without Rule 1127 implementation.

The 2006 and 2010 baselines (without Rule 1127) are 6.35 t/d and 5.80 t/d, respectively (Table 4, 

page 17 of the 2004 Staff Report).

The 2006 and 2010 reductions from current practices (without Rule 1127) are 1.38 t/d and 

1.31t/d, which represent 21.7% and 22.6% reductions, respectively. The 2006 and 2010 

remaining emissions are 4.97 t/d and 4.49 t/d. You can find these numbers from Table 4 

mentioned earlier.

With Rule 1127 implementation, the 2006 and 2010 reductions are 2.57 t/d and 2.47 t/d. The 

remaining with Rule 1127 are 3.79 t/d and 3.33 t/d. The 2006 and 2010 reductions from Rule

1127 implementation alone are 1.19 t/d and 1.16 t/d, which represent 31.3 % and 34.8% 

reductions, respectively. These numbers can be found from Table 7 and Table 8, page 20 of the 

2004 Staff Report.

If you have any further questions regarding these estimates, please let me know.

Best,

Le

From: Ward.LaWeeda@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Ward.LaWeeda@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 9:37 AM

To: Tuyet-le Pham

Subject: Revised Inventory for R1127

Le, any word on the revised inventory?
La Weeda Ward

Environmental Engineer

Region 9 Air Division

Southern California Field Office

600 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1460

Los Angeles, CA 90017

Phone: (213) 244-1812/ Fax (213) 244-1850

ward.laweeda@epa.gov111612 Reproduced Inventory of 2004 Staff Report.xls
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41111

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FERMIN SERRANO-ESTRADA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-511

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Fermin Serrano-Estrada pleaded guilty, pursuant to a written plea 

agreement, to conspiracy to harbor aliens in the United States in violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I), (a)(1)(A)(iii), and (a)(1)(B)(i). The district court 

sentenced Serrano-Estrada to 27 months of imprisonment.

Serrano-Estrada contends that the district court erred in denying his 

request for a minor-role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). That section 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41111 Document: 00513475493 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/21/2016
No. 15-41111

2

provides for a two-level reduction “[i]f the defendant was a minor participant 

in [the] criminal activity.” § 3B1.2(b). Whether Serrano-Estrada was a minor 

participant is a factual determination that is reviewed for clear error. See 

United States v. Alaniz, 726 F.3d 586, 626 (5th Cir. 2013).

The record reflects that Serrano-Estrada was recruited by “Chacon,” an 

unindicted co-conspirator from Mexico, to transport six undocumented aliens 

in exchange for $50 per alien. Serrano-Estrada, in turn, recruited co-defendant 

Leticia Rodriguez for the purposes of harboring and concealing the 

undocumented aliens at her home. It is undisputed that Serrano-Estrada 

transported the six undocumented aliens in his vehicle for the purpose of 

commercial advantage and private gain. As the driver, Serrano-Estrada’s role 

was central to the transportation of the undocumented aliens and “coextensive 

with the conduct for which he was held accountable.” United States v. Garcia, 

242 F.3d 593, 598-99 (5th Cir. 2001). The district court did not clearly err in 

rejecting Serrano-Estrada’s request for a minor-role adjustment under 

§ 3B1.2(b).

Next, Serrano-Estrada asserts that his criminal history category is “over 

represented or inadequate,” but he does not present any factual or legal basis 

for his claim. “A party that asserts an argument on appeal, but fails to 

adequately brief it, is deemed to have waived it.” United States v. Scroggins, 

599 F.3d 433, 446 (5th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted).

Finally, Serrano-Estrada challenges the district court’s imposition of the 

$100 special assessment provided by 18 U.S.C. § 3013. He argues that “this is 

unconstitutional and is based on no evidence.” Such a claim is foreclosed by 

United States v. Munoz-Flores, 495 U.S. 385, 401 (1990).

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM.

 Case: 15-41111 Document: 00513475493 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/21/2016
Amendment to PSS World Savings Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.8d 
 JANUARY 2012 AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 

PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC. SAVINGS PLAN 
 This January 2012 Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the PSS World Medical, Inc. Savings Plan is made and entered into by PSS World Medical, Inc. (the “Company”), this 24th day of
January, 2012, and is effective as of March 1, 2012. 
 WITNESSETH: 

WHEREAS, the Company has previously adopted the PSS World Medical, Inc. Savings Plan (the “Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company is authorized and empowered to amend the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to include the name of an additional employer recently acquired by the Company as
an “Employer” within the meaning of the Plan and to amend the Plan to credit Participants’ years of service with such employer as Years of Service under the Plan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows: 
 1. Section 1.28 of the Plan shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “1.28 ‘Employer’ shall mean the Company, Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc., PSS Service, Inc., World Med Shared Services, Inc., Physician Sales & Service, Inc., Physician
Sales & Service Limited Partnership, Proclaim, Inc., PSS Holding, Inc., Ancillary Management Solutions, Inc., Cascade Medical Supply, ThriftyMed, Inc., ClaimOne, LLC, Dispensing Solutions, Inc., Linear Medical Solutions, LLC, Stat RX USA,
LLC, BottomLine Medical Solutions, LLC, Theratech, Inc., Standard Medical Supply, Inc., Keltman Pharmaceutical, Inc., Federal Medical Supply, Inc., Blue Medical Supply, Inc. and any other subsidiary, related corporation, or other entity that adopts
this Plan with the consent of the Company.” 
 2. Section 1.71 of the Plan shall be amended by the addition of a new
subparagraph (m), which shall read in its entirety as follows: 
 “(m) For each Employee who was employed by
Blue Medical Supply, Inc. on January 13, 2012, such Employee’s ‘Years of Service’ shall include, for all purposes of the Plan, service with Blue Medical Supply, Inc. and each of its subsidiaries.” 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and is effective as of the date
set forth hereinabove. All of the provisions of the Plan not specifically mentioned in this Amendment shall be considered modified to the extent necessary to be consistent with the changes made in this Amendment. 

 

			
	PSS WORLD MEDICAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David D. Klarner

	Its:	 	Vice President and Treasurer
----

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2006 — Amending Budget 1

(2006/994/EC)

REVENUE

TITLE 2

OTHER SUBSIDIES

                        CHAPTER 2 0 —NORWAY PARTICIPATION

Remarks

Other subsidies.

                        CHAPTER 2 1 —PRE-ACCESSION STRATEGY

                        CHAPTER 2 2 —EXPENDITURE FOR IMPLEMENTING SPECIAL PROJECTS FUNDED BY SPECIFIC EU SUBSIDIES

TITLE 3

REVENUE FOR SERVICES RENDERED AGAINST PAYMENT

                        CHAPTER 3 0 —REVENUE FOR SERVICES RENDERED AGAINST PAYMENT

Remarks

Revenue for services rendered against payment.

PHARE EXPENDITURE

TITLE 1

EXPENDITURE RELATING TO PERSONS WORKING WITH THE EMCDDA

                        CHAPTER 1 1 —STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT

                           1 1 4Salaries and allowances for Contractual Agents

                              1 1 4 1Contractual Agents

Remarks

This appropriation is intended to cover the remuneration (including overtime) and the employer's share of social security contributions for contractual agents.

TITLE 2

EXPENDITURE FOR SUPPORT ACTIVITIES

                        CHAPTER 2 1 —ADMINISTRATIVE AND LOGISTIC SUPPORT ACTIVITIES

                           2 1 2Data Processing

                              2 1 2 1Computer centre operations

Remarks

This appropriation is intended to cover the purchase, hire, leasing and maintenance of computer hardware, software/software packages and other computer consumables.

                           2 1 4Current administrative expenditure

                              2 1 4 1Bank and other financial charges

Remarks

This appropriation is intended to cover bank charges and the cost of connection to the interbank telecommunications network.

TITLE 3

EXPENDITURE FOR OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS

                        CHAPTER 3 1 —DISSEMINATION AND COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES

                           3 1 1Publishing

                              3 1 1 1Publishing

Remarks

This appropriation is intended specifically to cover:

                           3 1 4Project related activities to be handled outside

                              3 1 4 1Project related activities to be handled outside

Remarks

This appropriation is intended to cover expenditure on specialised studies, contracted out to experts or consultants, which cannot be undertaken by the EMCDDA itself due to a lack of suitable staff.

                           3 1 6Missions

                              3 1 6 1Missions

Remarks

This appropriation is intended to cover expenditure on transport, the payment of daily mission allowances and the ancillary or exceptional expenses incurred by established staff in the interests of the service, in accordance with the provisions of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities.

                           3 1 8Technical Meetings

                              3 1 8 1Technical Meetings

Remarks

This appropriation is intended to cover expenditure on the organisation of and participation in non-institutional meetings.

TITLE 5

RESERVE

----
Exhibit 32.2


                 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     The undersigned executive officer of PFS Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-QSB
for the period ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained therein fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.

                                  /s/Stuart M. Suggs
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Stuart M . Suggs
                                  Title: Corporate Treasurer, Chief Operating
                                          Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  November 12, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to PFS Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by PFS Bancorp, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1647

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to provide

that forest management activities shall be subject to initial judicial review

only in the United States district court for the district in which the

affected land is located, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 27 (legislative day, MARCH 26), 1996

Mr. PRESSLER (for himself, Mr. CRAIG, Mr. LOTT, Mr. BENNETT, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. STEVENS, Mr. MURKOWSKI, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. KYL, and Mr.

THOMAS), introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Federal Land Policy and Management Act

of 1976 to provide that forest management activities

shall be subject to initial judicial review only in the

United States district court for the district in which

the affected land is located, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1647 IS

1 SECTION 1. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FOREST MANAGEMENT

2 ACTIVITIES.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title VII of the Federal Land

4 Policy and Management Act of 1976 (Public Law 94–579;

5 43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) is amended—

6 (1) in the title heading, by adding: ‘‘; JUDI7 CIAL REVIEW’’ at the end; and

8 (2) by adding at the end the following:

9 ‘‘SEC. 708. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF FOREST MANAGEMENT AC10 TIVITIES.

11 ‘‘(a) DEFINITION OF FOREST MANAGEMENT ACTIV12 ITY.—In this section, the term ‘forest management activ13 ity’ means a sale of timber, the issuance of a grazing per14 mit or grazing lease, or any other activity authorized

15 under a land use plan under this Act or a land or resource

16 management plan under section 6 of the Forest and

17 Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974

18 (16 U.S.C. 1604) to be carried out on Federal land.

19 ‘‘(b) JUDICIAL REVIEW.—A forest management ac20 tivity and land use plan under this Act or a land or re21 source management plan under section 6 of the Forest

22 and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of

23 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604) (including an amendment to or

24 revision of a plan) shall be subject to initial judicial review

25 only in the United States district court for the district in

26 which the affected land is located.’’.
3

•S 1647 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con2 tents of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act

3 of 1976 (43 U.S.C. prec. 1701) is amended—

4 (1) in the heading relating to title VII, by add5 ing ‘‘; JUDICIAL REVIEW’’ at the end; and

6 (2) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘Sec. 708. Judicial review of forest management activities.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             August 14, 2008
    
    By /s/ Kent W. Peters
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate
    
    Kent W. Peters
    
    (principal executive officer)