alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ray C. Davis, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14,
2005



/s/ Ray C. DavisRay C. DavisCo-Chief Executive Officer


---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kelcy L. Warren, Co-Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: November 14,
2005



/s/ Kelcy L. WarrenKelcy L. WarrenCo-Chief Executive Officer


---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to and will be retained by Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Don WOODWARD, Appellant, v. Charlie I. BRAUN et al., Appellees.

No. 3380.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Feb. 27, 1959.

House, Mercer & House, James D. Cunningham, San Antonio, for appellant.

Moursunind, Ball, Bergstrom & Barrow, Rosson & McGown, San Antonio, for ap-pellees.

WALTER, Justice.

Don Woodward filed suit against Charlie I. Braun, individually and as administrator of the estate of Charles Richard Braun, deceased, for damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him in an automobile truck collision. Woodward was driving the truck and Charles Richard Braun, deceased, was .operating the automobile. International Service Insurance *673Company intervened, asserting it paid Woodward workmen’s compensation benefits, and sought to have its subrogation rights enforced in the event Woodward recovered. The jury having found Woodward guilty of several acts of negligence, which it found were a proximate cause of the collision, the court entered judgment that Woodward take nothing. He has appealed and presents twenty-four points of error. Four relate to the court’s action in overruling exceptions to Braun’s trial amendment number one. Four relate to the alleged improper admission of evidence. Two relate to the court’s refusal to submit requested special issues. Twelve points relate to alleged error of the court in not sustaining objections to the charge. Two points assert the court erred in entering judgment on the verdict because the jury’s answers were motivated by passion and prejudice.

We have reached the conclusion that there is no merit in any of appellant’s points and that the judgment- of the trial court should be affirmed.

We shall refer to the case of Charlie I. Braun v. Union Transports, Inc., as the Union Transports case and the case of Don L. Woodward v. Charlie I. Braun, as the Woodward case. The court refused to consolidate these cases but ordered that the Union Transports case and the Woodward case be tried at the same time.

Appellant’s points that the court erred in overruling his exception to Charlie I. Braun’s trial amendment number one are without merit because said amendment specifically referred to, and amended, paragraph four of Charlie I. Braun’s second amended original petition in the Union Transports case. These points were properly presented and considered and overruled by this court in Union Transports, Inc. v. Braun, Tex.Civ.App., 318 S.W.2d 927.

Appellant’s remaining points were considered in the Union Transports case and in deference to Rules of Civil Procedure 452, we hereby refer to and make a part here of that portion of our opinion in the Union Transports case which discusses and disposes of Woodward’s remaining points.

We have considered all of appellant’s points and find no merit in them and they are overruled.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
# (D ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 23-0038
BOWDREA NICOLAI,

Petitioner,

v. DON BELL, Lake County Sheriff, and BRENDON McQUILLAN,

Respondents. 

# FILED JAN 3 1 2'23 Bowen Gi .....,:rivvood C. of Supreme Court

. .iate of mr“-,tana ORDER

Bowdrea Nicolai has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, requesting his release on his own recognizance because the bail of $50,000 is excessive. Nicolai also contendsthat lawenforcementpersonnel conducted an illegal search and that itwasnothis "stuff'in the car. He addsthat lawenforcement personnel forcibly interrogated him while he was detained. Habeas corpus affords an applicant an opportunity to challenge collaterally the legality of his present incarceration. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Section 46-22-103, MCA, provides that a petitioner may raise the issue of want of bail in a habeas corpus proceeding. We point out that Nicolai has not provided any more information about his underlying case in the Lake County District Court. His other claims concerning the stop, search, and interrogation are not remedied by habeas corpus. Gates v. Missoula Cnty. Comm'rs, 235 Mont. 261, 262, 766 P.2d 884, 884-85 (1988). We securcd a copy ofthe register ofactions from the District Court. The District Court received the Justice Court record on November 15, 2022, and the State moved for leave to file its charging documents, charging Nicolai with felony criminal possession of dangerous drugs with intent to distribute. The District Court granted leave and later held 01/31/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0038an arraignment hearing on December 1, 2022. The last entry, on December 12, 2022,

revealsthat a second order for ajury trial was issued after substitution ofthe firstjudge. Nicolai has a bail amount imposed. Nicolai has not demonstrated want of bail, pursuant to §46-22-103, MCA. A district court hasthe discretion to grant or deny release and bail as well to set conditions. Graff? v. Mont. FourthJudicialDist. Ct., 2021 MT 201, 11,405 Mont. 192,492 P.3d 1213. Nicolai has counsel to represent him, and hiscounsel may move for bail modification. The cause ofhis incarceration is his pending criminal case in District Court. Nicolai has not demonstrated that he is illegally incarcerated or detained. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. He is not entitled to release. Nicolai should refrain from filingpleadings on his own behalfwith thisCourtwhen he is represented by counsel. M.R.App.P. 10(1)(c);State v. Samples, 2005 MT 210,

## ¶5, 328 Mont. 242, 119 P.3d 1191. He has the remedy of appealing any conviction and sentence to this Court after the District Court issues a finaljudgment. IT ISORDERED that Nicolai's Petition for Writ ofHabeasCorpus isDENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk ofthe Supreme Court is directed to provide a copy ofthis Order to: the Honorable Molly Owen, District Court Judge; Lyn Fricker, Clerk ofDistrict Court, Lake County, under Cause No. DC 22-354; Don Bell, Sheriff; Brendan McQuillan, Deputy County Attorney; Sterling Laudon, Defense Counsel; counsel of record, and Bowdrea Nicolai personally. DATED this 3eday ofJanuary, 2023.

ChiefJustice

## (12rtz---



# A24,f 41/,

Justices

3
Order entered December 29, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01453-CV

IN RE ETHAN JEREMY HAZELTON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-55640-2013

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY AS MOOT relator’s December 13, 

2016 petition for writ of habeas corpus, and we VACATE the deadlines for filing responses to 

the petition and for filing the reporter’s record.

We further DISCHARGE the bond paid by relator in accordance with this Court’s order 

of December 13, 2016.

We ORDER that relator recover the costs of this original proceeding from real party in 

interest Katie Bliss Hazelton.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK

 JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Annual Report of UnionBanCal Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Masashi Oka, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



Dated:
March 16, 2011

By:

/s/ MASASHI OKA Masashi Oka Chief Executive Officer


---
3 American Airline Petition for Extension to Exemption (FAR 121. 619 )

Docket FAA

- 2010

- 0055

Attachment

November 4, 201 5

SUMMARY OF AMERICAN AIRLINE S PETITION

Petitioner: American Airlines, Inc. (AAL) Regulations Affected: 14 CFR 121.619 Description of Relief Sought: American Airlines requests an extension of Exemption No. 10,000 (Docket No. FAA

- 2010

- 0055), which is due to expire on January 31, 201 6 . This exemption provides relief from 14 CFR 121.619 by allowing American Airlines to dispatch aircraft to domestic airports without designating an alternate for the destination airport

where for at least 1 hour before and 1 hour after the estimated time of arrival at the destination airport the appropriate weather reports or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate the ceiling will be at least 1,000 feet above the airport elevation and visibility will be at least 3 statute miles for airports utiliz ing Category CAT I ILS authorizations or the visibility will be at least 2 statute miles for airports utilizing CAT II or CAT III ILS authorizations.
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1931

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 4, 1996

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

AN ACT

To provide that the United States Post Office and Courthouse building located at 9 East Broad Street,

Cookeville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated

as the ‘L. Clure Morton United States Post Office and

Courthouse’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1931 RFH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF L. CLURE MORTON UNITED

2 STATES POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE.

3 The United States Post Office and Courthouse build4 ing located at 9 East Broad Street, Cookeville, Tennessee,

5 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘L. Clure Morton

6 United States Post Office and Courthouse’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

10 States Post Office and Courthouse building referred to in

11 section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘L.

12 Clure Morton United States Post Office and Courthouse’’.

Passed the Senate August 2, 1996.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 26 September 2006         

on aid measure No C 49/2005 (ex N 233/2005) for Chemobudowa Kraków S.A.

(notified under document number C(2006) 4214)

(Only the Polish version is authentic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/950/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 88(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 62(1)(a) thereof,

Having called on interested parties to submit their comments (1) pursuant to those provisions and having regard to their comments,

Whereas:

I.   PROCEDURE

II.   DETAILED DESCRIPTION

1.   The aid recipient

2.   The aid measures

3.   Grounds for initiating the procedure

III.   COMMENTS FROM THE POLISH AUTHORITIES

IV.   ASSESSMENT OF THE MEASURES

V.   CONCLUSION

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The measures which Poland was planning to implement for Chemobudowa Kraków, amounting to PLN 10 693 000, were withdrawn after the Commission opened the formal investigation procedure. The formal investigation procedure therefore no longer applies to these measures.

Article 2

The measure granted on 12 May 2004 was later annulled by the granting authority. The formal investigation procedure therefore no longer applies to this measure. Regarding the measure granted on 20 May 2004, the Commission concludes that it does not constitute state aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) of the EC Treaty.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to Poland.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2006.

For the Commission

Neelie KROES            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ C 150, 28.6.2006, p. 51.

(2)  See footnote 1.

(3)OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1. Regulation as amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# DATES:

February 2, 2024, at 11:00 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

77 K Street NE, Washington, DC 20002.

# Status:

Closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Board Meeting Agenda

### Closed Session

1. Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B).

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1).                

Dated: January 25, 2024.

Dharmesh Vashee,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2024-01784 Filed 1-29-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ N. Anthony ColesN. Anthony ColesPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Matthew K  FustMatthew K. FustExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Meeting with National Association of Music Merchants

Location: U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, 20460

Date and Time: August 13, 2013, 1 pm 

EPA staff met with James Goldberg of Goldberg & Associates, PLLC representing the National Association 

of Music Merchants regarding the two proposed rules to implement Title VI of the Toxic Substances 

Control Act (TSCA). Mr. Goldberg clarified during the meeting that his association members mostly

purchase and assemble finished goods made from composite wood products and therefore would be 

considered fabricators as opposed to laminated product producers under our proposed rule. Examples 

of what his members assemble include keyboards, instrument cases, audio speakers, guitars, and violins. 

Mr. Goldberg discussed his concern about the proposed recordkeeping and labeling provisions for

importers and fabricators to disclose the name of the panel producer in their records. Similarly he was 

concerned that importers might not know the names of their fabricators and therefore could not put 

that on their label. Mr. Goldberg stated that his members who purchase parts made from composite 

wood products or who import parts made from composite wood products may not be provided the 

identity of the panel producer or fabricator because it is claimed as proprietary information. Mr 

Goldberg also expressed his interest to partner with EPA to conduct outreach to his members on the 

requirements under TSCA Title VI once finalized.
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 195

To amend section 257(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit

Control Act of 1985 to modify the treatment of losses from asset sales.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 11 (legislative day, JANUARY 10), 1995

Mr. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees

on the Budget and Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one

committee reports, the other committee have thirty days to report or be

discharged

A BILL

To amend section 257(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to modify the treatment of losses from asset sales.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OFFSETTING LOSSES FROM ASSET SALES.

4 Section 257(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emer5 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by striking

6 the semicolon at the end thereof and inserting the follow7 ing: ‘‘. Effective beginning fiscal year 1996, the proceeds
2

•S 195 RIS

1 from the sale of an asset may be applied to offset the loss

2 of any revenue or receipts resulting from such sale.’’.

Æ
**
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on thedate hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020(“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: July 29, 2020 

 

/s/ *David Gladstone*

David Gladstone

Chief Executive Officer and

Chairman of the Board of Directors
**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 8, 2014

No. 04-14-00086-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Y.G.B., A CHILD,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-00166

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellee's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. 

It is so ORDERED on May 8, 2014.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 1.1
 -Translated from French-
 FLAMEL TECHNOLOGIES
 A joint stock company with a share capital of  2,933,195
Registered office located at VENISSIEUX (Rhône) Parc Club du Moulin à Vent
33, avenue du Docteur Georges Lévy
 R.C.S. LYON B 379.001.530
 
 BY LAWS
 Updated as of April 3, 2008
 
 ARTICLE
1  FORM
  ARTICLE
2  CORPORATE NAME
 FLAMEL TECHNOLOGIES.
  ARTICLE
3  COMPANY PURPOSE




---



##### 



-Translated from French-
  ARTICLE
4  REGISTERED OFFICE
  département département
 ARTICLE
5  DURATION
  ARTICLE
6  SHARE CAPITAL
 
 ARTICLE
7  FISCAL YEAR
   ARTICLE
8  ALLOCATION OF THE PROFITS
   ARTICLE
9  TYPE OF THE SHARES
   ARTICLE
10  SALE AND ASSIGNMENT OF SHARES




---



##### 



-Translated from French-
      ARTICLE
11  RIGHTS AND DUTIES ATTACHED TO THE SHARES
     ARTICLE
12  PAYMENT OF THE SHARE CAPITAL
  départment
  ARTICLE
13  BOARD OF DIRECTORS
  Conseil dEtat




---



##### 



-Translated from French-
     ARTICLE
14  DELIBERATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
          ARTICLE
15  POWERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS




---



##### 



-Translated from French-
 ARTICLE
16  CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
     ARTICLE
17  GENERAL MANAGEMENT
 Directeur Général




---



##### 



-Translated from French-
    ARTICLE
18  STATUTORY AUDITORS
   ARTICLE
19  GENERAL MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS
    -
    
    the registration of the shareholder in the Companys share accounts for owners of registered
shares,
 -
    
    the deposit, at the place indicated in the calling notice, of a certificate of account
registration issued by the bank, the financial establishment or the stockbroker, depositary of
the shares, as the case may be, for the owners of bearer shares.
      Conseil dEtat
  ARTICLE
20  POWERS AND RESOLUTIONS OF THE SHAREHOLDERS MEETINGS




---



##### 



-Translated from French-
 ARTICLE
21  DISSOLUTION  LIQUIDATION
  ARTICLE
22  DISPUTES