alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 191 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                  S. 191

      To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to ensure that 
 constitutionally protected private property rights are not infringed 
until adequate protection is afforded by reauthorization of the Act, to 
protect against economic losses from critical habitat designation, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 11 (legislative day, January 10), 1995

Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. Lott, Mr. Gramm, Mr. Grassley, and Mr. 
   Nickles) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to ensure that 
 constitutionally protected private property rights are not infringed 
until adequate protection is afforded by reauthorization of the Act, to 
protect against economic losses from critical habitat designation, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farm, Ranch, and Homestead 
Protection Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON DETERMINATION OF ENDANGERED SPECIES AND 
              THREATENED SPECIES AND DESIGNATION OF CRITICAL HABITAT.

    Section 4(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1533(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Moratorium.--Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (3), 
        during the period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
        paragraph and ending on the effective date of the first 
        subsequent reauthorization of this Act, the Secretary may not--
                    ``(A) determine that a species is an endangered 
                species or a threatened species under paragraph (1); or
                    ``(B) designate habitat of a species to be critical 
                habitat under paragraph (3).''.

SEC. 3. AGENCY ACTIONS.

    Section 7(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
1536(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(5) Moratorium.--Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) through 
        (4), during the period beginning on the date of enactment of 
        this paragraph and ending on the effective date of the first 
        subsequent reauthorization of this Act, a Federal agency shall 
        not be required to comply with paragraphs (1) through (4).''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1778 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1778

             To suspend temporarily the duty on indolenine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 1996

  Mr. Breaux introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To suspend temporarily the duty on indolenine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INDOLENINE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

    

         ``    9902.33.90     Indolenine (CAS                                                                   
                               No. 1640-39-7)                                                                   
                               (provided for in                                                                 
                               subheading                                                                       
                               2933.90.82).....  Free        No change        No change       On or before      
                                                                                               12/31/99         
                                                                                                                

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26


                                AMENDMENT NO.1
                                      TO
                          DONNA KARAN INTERNATIONAL INC.
                              DEFERRED BONUS PLAN


          Pursuant to Section 20 of the Donna Karan International Inc.
Deferred Bonus Plan (the "Plan"), Donna Karan International Inc. (the
"Company") hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the Plan, effective January
24, 2000:

     1.   The third and fourth sentences of Section 4(a) of the Plan are
amended in their entirety to read as follows:

          "The election to defer an Award must be made at such time as the
          Company shall prescribe but in no event later than the
          first day of March of the Plan Year in which the Award to
          which the deferral relates is earned. Notwithstanding
          the foregoing, in the case of the Plan Year in which an
          individual first becomes an Eligible Employee (other than
          as a result of the adoption of the Plan), such individual
          may make an election to defer an Award earned during such
          Plan Year within thirty (30) days of the date of initial
          eligibility (but only with respect to compensation for
          services after such date)."

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be
executed by its officer duly authorized, this 24th day of January, 2000.

                        DONNA KARAN INTERNATIONAL INC.


                        BY: /s/ Lynn E. Usdan
                           --------------------------
                           Name:   Lynn E. Usdan
                           Title:  Secretary
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1710

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 20, 1996

Referred to the Committee on National Security

AN ACT

To authorize multiyear contracting for the C–17 aircraft

program, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1710 RFH

1 SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING AUTHORITY FOR

2 THE C–17 AIRCRAFT PROGRAM.

3 (a) MULTIYEAR CONTRACTS AUTHORIZED.—The

4 Secretary of the Air Force may, pursuant to section 2306b

5 of title 10, United States Code (except as provided in sub6 section (b)(1)), enter into one or more multiyear contracts

7 for the procurement of not more than a total of 80 C–

8 17 aircraft.

9 (b) CONTRACT PERIOD.—(1) Notwithstanding sec10 tion 2306b(k) of title 10, United States Code, the period

11 covered by a contract entered into on a multiyear basis

12 under the authority of subsection (a) may exceed five

13 years, but may not exceed seven years.

14 (2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as prohibit15 ing the Secretary of the Air Force from entering into a

16 multiyear contract for a period of less than seven years.

17 In determining to do so, the Secretary shall consider

18 whether—

19 (A) sufficient funding is provided for in the fu20 ture-years defense program for procurement, within

21 the shorter period, of the total number of aircraft to

22 be procured (within the number set forth in sub23 section (a)); and

24 (B) the contractor is capable of delivering that

25 total number of aircraft within the shorter period.
3

S 1710 RFH

1 (c) OPTION TO CONVERT TO ONE-YEAR PROCURE2 MENTS.—Each multiyear contract for the procurement of

3 C–17 aircraft authorized by subsection (a) shall include

4 a clause that permits the Secretary of the Air Force—

5 (1) to terminate the contract as of September

6 30, 1998, without a modification in the price of each

7 aircraft and without incurring any obligation to pay

8 the contractor termination costs; and

9 (2) to then enter into follow-on one-year con10 tracts with the contractor for the procurement of C–

11 17 aircraft (within the total number of aircraft au12 thorized under subsection (a)) at a negotiated price

13 that is not to exceed the price that is negotiated be14 fore September 30, 1998, for the annual production

15 contract for the C–17 aircraft in lot VIII and subse16 quent lots.

Passed the Senate May 17, 1996.

Attest: KELLY J. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Ray J. Oleson, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed thiscertification in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 26, 2005 (the “Report”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that: 

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| May 3, 2005 | SI INTERNATIONAL, INC.    |
|------------------|---------------------------|
|             |                      |
|             |                      |
|             | /s/ RAY J. OLESON         |
|             | Ray J. Oleson             |
|             | Chairman of the Board and |
|             | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

1

----

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Thomas E. Dunn, the Chief FinancialOfficer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed thiscertification in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 26, 2005 (the “Report”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that: 

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 
| May 3, 2005 | SI INTERNATIONAL, INC.                |
|------------------|---------------------------------------|
|             |                                  |
|             |                                  |
|             | /s/ THOMAS E. DUNN                    |
|             | Thomas E. Dunn                        |
|             | Executive Vice President,             |
|             | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

2

----
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF EHRHARDT KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of Webb Interactive Services, Inc. and in the related prospectuses of our report dated April 8, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Webb Interactive Services, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for
the year ended December 31, 2004:



|                 |  |                  |  |                 
|---------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------
|1) No. 333-13983 |  | 3) No. 333-63632 |  | 5) No. 333-83103
|2) No. 333-57442 |  | 4) No. 333-82316 |  | 6) No. 333-89600



/s/
EHRHARDT KEEFE STEINER & HOTTMAN PC



Denver, Colorado

April 14, 2005



Ex-81
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2083

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Jonathon Stout, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 5, 2006 Filed: January 11, 2006

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jonathon Stout pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). His written plea agreement included an appeal waiver. The district court 1 sentenced him to the statutory minimum of 180 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. See18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). On appeal, Stout’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under A nders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Stout has filed a pro se supplemental brief.-2- After reading the briefs and reviewi ng the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we dismiss this app eal on the basis of the appeal waiver in the plea agreement. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-90 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (criteria for enforcing appeal waiver), cert. denied , 540 U.S. 997 (2003); United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5588-5589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 1, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

[[Page 5589]]

    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; Institution 
and settlement of administrative proceedings; Resolution of 
litigation claims; and Other matters relating to examinations and 
enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: January 25, 2024.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-01786 Filed 1-25-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
##### 



Exhibit
10.2
 
  
       
  /s/ Chris Felfe
    
    8-14-07Signature  Chris Felfe
    
    Date
#### Sisir CHATTOPADHYAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tommy G. THOMPSON, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1943.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 6, 2003.

Gary T. Brown, Gary T. Brown *&*Associates, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*644OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Sisir Chattopadhyay appeals from the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to the Employer and dismissing his employment discrimination action based upon national origin for failure to timely exhaust administrative remedies and denying his motion for reconsideration. Finding no error, we affirm.

This court reviews de novo a district court’s order granting summary judgment and views the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. *Providence Square*Assocs., *L.L.C. v. G.D.F., Inc.,*211 F.3d 846, 850 (4th Cir.2000). Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). Summary judgment will be granted unless a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party on the evidence presented. *Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.,*477 U.S. 242, 247-48, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986).

A federal employee is required to timely exhaust his administrative remedies by initiating contact with an EEO counselor within forty-five days of the date of the matter alleged *to be*discriminatory, *or of*the effective date of the alleged discriminatory personnel action. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) (2001); *Jakubiak v. Perry,*101 F.3d 23, 26-27 (4th Cir.1996) (federal employee must notify EEO counselor within 45 days of discriminatory incident). The time limit may be extended if the complainant shows that he was *not*notified or aware of the time limits. 29 C.F.R. § 1613.214(a)(4) (2001).

Courts strictly adhere to time limits and rarely allow equitable tolling of limitations periods. *See Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs,*498 U.S. 89, 95-96, 111 S.Ct. 453,

112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990). After a review of the record, we conclude that Chattopa-dhyay had constructive notice of the EEO filing requirements. *See Nealon v. Stone,*958 F.2d 584, 589-90 (4th Cir.1992); *Zo-grafov v. V.A. Medical Ctr.,*779 F.2d 967, 968-70 (4th Cir.1985).

We therefore affirm the judgment order and order denying the motion for reconsideration. We deny Appellant’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Netopia, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Alan B. Lefkof, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



i. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



ii. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By:

/s/    ALAN B.
LEFKOFAlan B. Lefkof President and Chief Executive Officer




Date: February 1, 2005
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 26, 2009
 QLOGIC CORPORATION
  Delaware
    
    0-23298
    
    33-0537669(State of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 26650 Aliso Viejo Parkway, Aliso Viejo, California
    
    92656(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (949) 389-6000
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXEX-99.1    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures




---



##### Table of Contents



Stock-based compensation.
 Amortization of purchased intangible assets
 Acquisition-related stock-based compensation
 Special charges
 Impairment of available-for-sale securities.




---



##### Table of Contents



Net gains on trading securities.
 Income taxes.




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
  99.1
    
    Press Release*, dated January 26, 2009, reporting the financial results of
QLogic Corporation for its fiscal third quarter ended December 28, 2008.
 
 *
    
    The press release is being furnished pursuant to
Item 9.01, and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  QLOGIC CORPORATIONJanuary 26, 2009
    /s/ Simon BiddiscombeSimon BiddiscombeSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description of Document99.1
    
    Press Release, dated January 26, 2009, reporting the financial
results of QLogic Corporation for its fiscal third quarter ended
December 28, 2008.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 7.1

  STATEMENT EXPLAINING HOW CERTAIN RATIOS WERE CALCULATED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT

1.   The operating ratio of Guangshen Railway is the ratio of its total railway
     operating expenses in 2007 (in the amount of RMB8,334.3 million, compared
     to RMB2,527.9 million in 2006) to its total railway revenues in 2007 (in
     the amount of RMB9,819.5 million, compared to RMB3,465.9 million in 2006).

2.   Guangshen Railway's total railway operating income ratio is 1 minus the
     operating ratio.

3.   Guangshen Railway's overall operating income ratio is 1 minus the ratio of
     its operating costs in 2007 (in the amount of RMB8,793.1 million, compared
     to RMB2,693.9 million in 2006) to its business revenues in 2007 (in the
     amount of RMB10,508.5 million, compared to RMB3,594.5 million in 2006).