alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
bbsi-ex1024_558.htm



 

EXHIBIT 10.24

 

 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYEE RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

AWARD AGREEMENT FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Section 4 of each Award Agreement is amended, effective January 30, 2017, to read in its entirety as follows:

 

Participant is responsible for the payment of all federal, state and local withholding taxes and Participant's portion of any applicable payroll taxes imposed in connection with the settlement of the RSUs and the issuance of Shares (collectively, the "Applicable Taxes").  To satisfy this obligation, the Corporation will withhold a number of unrestricted Shares (thus reducing the number of unrestricted Shares to be issued to Participant) having a Fair Market Value (as of the Settlement Date) equal to the minimum amount of Applicable Taxes required to be withheld by law in connection with settlement of the Award.  The number of Shares withheld will be rounded up to the nearest whole Share and the excess cash amount will be added to the tax payment remitted by the Corporation on the Participant’s behalf.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2139 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2139

  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of child 
safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on 
              commercial aircraft, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 1996

  Mrs. Murray introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 49, United States Code, to require the use of child 
safety restraint systems approved by the Secretary of Transportation on 
              commercial aircraft, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHILD SAFETY RESTRAINT SYSTEMS ON COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 447 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 44724. Child safety restraint systems
    ``(a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this section, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue 
regulations requiring the use of child safety restraint systems that 
have been approved by the Secretary on any aircraft operated by an air 
carrier in providing interstate air transportation, intrastate air 
transportation, or foreign air transportation.
    ``(b) Age or Weight Limits.--The regulations issued under this 
section shall establish age or weight limits for children who use the 
child safety restraint systems.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The chapter analysis for chapter 447 of 
title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``44724. Child safety restraint systems.''.

SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD.

    It is the sense of the Congress that the United States 
representative to the International Civil Aviation Organization should 
seek an international standard to require that passengers on a civil 
aviation aircraft be restrained--
            (1) on takeoff and landing; and
            (2) when directed by the captain of such aircraft.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Theodore R. Maloney,certify that:

 

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,2003 (the “Report”) of MediCor Ltd. (the “Company”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of MediCor.

 

Date:November 14, 2003

 

 
|   | /s/  Theodore R. Maloney |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Theodore  R. Maloney     |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 10.13(ii)
 Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  2005 Equity Incentive Plan  Non-Discretionary Grant
Program For Directors
 Option Agreement  (Nonstatutory Stock Option)
 Grant Notice Company Plan
  1. Vesting.
 2. Number of Shares and Exercise Price.
 3. Method of Payment. permitted by your Grant Notice,
 (a) The Wall Street
Journal
 (b) The Wall Street
Journal
 1




---



##### 



4. Whole Shares.
 5. Securities Law Compliance.
 6. Term.
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 7. Exercise.
 (a)
 (b)
 2




---



##### 



8. Transferability.
 9. Change in Control.
 (a)
 (b) Payment Excise Tax
 3




---



##### 



(c)
 (d)
 10. Option not a Service Contract.
 11. Withholding Obligations.
 (a)
 (b)
 4




---



##### 



(c)
 12. Notices.
 13. Governing Plan Document.
 5
#### ANTHONY GUSSIE, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

See same case below: 1 N. J. Super. 293; 64 A. 2nd 244.

*Mr. Samuel M. Cole*for the petitioner.

*Messrs. O’Mara, Conway & Schumann*for the respondent.

June 13, 1949.

Denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1874 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1874

To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are 
 obsolete or inconsistent with other statutes and to repeal a related 
       section of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 1996

 Mr. Johnston introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are 
 obsolete or inconsistent with other statutes and to repeal a related 
       section of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Energy Standardization 
Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. STANDARDIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REQUIREMENTS WITH 
              GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Department of Energy Regulations.--
            (1) Section 501 of the Department of Energy Organization 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 7191) is amended by striking subsections (b) and 
        (d).
            (2) Technical and conforming amendment.--Section 501(e) of 
        the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7191(e)) 
        is amended by striking ``subsections (b), (c), and (d)'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (c)''.
    (b) Special Requirements Affecting Advisory Committees.--
            (1) Section 624 of the Department of Energy Organization 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 7234) is amended by--
                    (A) striking ``(a)''; and
                    (B) striking subsection (b).
            (2) Technical and conforming amendment.--Section 17 of the 
        Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 776) is 
        hereby repealed.
                                 <all>
```
ORDER - 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 22-0342

STATE OF MONTANA, 

 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v.

JEREMY HOLMQUIST,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 30, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed and dated as indicated below.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 3 2024

01/03/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0342
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30225

Summary Calendar

 

JOHN LOUIS ELIE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CAROLYN RYLAND, Clerk of Court,

9th JDC Rapides Parish,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1132

- - - - - - - - - -

September 17, 1997

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

John Louis Elie, Louisiana prisoner # 71390, has appealed the

district court’s grant of summary judgment to Carolyn Ryland, Clerk

of the Ninth Judicial District Court of Rapides Parish, Louisiana.

Elie argues that Ryland deprived him of constitutional rights by

mishandling his motion for expungement of arrests and prior

convictions. We find no error in the analysis adopted by the
district court. See Elie v. Ryland, No. 95-1132 (W.D. La. Feb. 3,

1997). 

Elie’s motion for attorney’s fees is DENIED because he is not

the prevailing party and he has proceeded pro se on appeal. See 42

U.S.C. § 1988(b); Cofield v. City of Atlanta, 648 F.2d 986, 987-88

(5th Cir. Unit B June 1981).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Martin E. Thorp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by In
Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



June 20, 2005                                       /s/ Martin E. Thorp
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Martin E. Thorp
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification**

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Finance, L.L.C. and NexstarFinance, Inc. (together, the “Company”), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

| Dated:  August 14, 2003 | /s/    PERRY A. SOOK                                              |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                                                                       |
|                              | **Perry A. Sook President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)** |

          The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Ss 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.
II

Calendar No. 442

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1888

To extend energy conservation programs under the Energy Policy and

Conservation Act through September 30, 1996.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 19, 1996

Mr. MURKOWSKI, from the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, reported the following original bill; which was read twice and placed on the

calendar

A BILL

To extend energy conservation programs under the Energy

Policy and Conservation Act through September 30, 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 TITLE I—ENERGY POLICY AND

4 CONSERVATION

5 SECTION 101. SHORT TITLE.

6 This title may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Policy and

7 Conservation Act Amendments of 1996’’.
2

S 1888 PCS

1 SEC. 102. TITLE AMENDMENTS.

2 Part D of title I of the Energy Policy and Conserva3 tion Act is amended in section 181 (42 U.S.C. 6251) by

4 striking ‘‘June 30’’ both places it appears and inserting

5 in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30’’.

6 SEC. 103. TITLE D AMENDMENTS.

7 Part D of title II of the Energy Policy and Conserva8 tion Act is amended in section 281 (42 U.S.C. 6285) by

9 striking ‘‘June 30’’ both places it appears and inserting

10 in lieu thereof ‘‘September 30’’.

Calendar No. 442

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1888

A BILL

To extend energy conservation programs under the

September 30, 1996.Energy Policy and Conservation Act through

JUNE 19, 1996

Read twice and placed on the calendar
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
O. Hatler, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Gerald O. Hatler
-----------------------------------------------------
Gerald O. Hatler
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 12, 2005
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PERSONNEL STAFFING GROUP, LLC d/b/a MVP STAFFING AGENCY 

d/b/a MVP WORKFORCE, LLC d/b/a BARNETT MANAGEMENT,

Appellant,

v.

BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-2396

[April 15, 2021]

Non-final appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial 

Circuit, Broward County; David Haimes, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE17-

021790.

Carter A. Korey of Korey Richardson LLP, Chicago, for appellant.

Todd R. Ehrenreich, David L. Luck and Jenna L. Fischman of Lewis 

Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Coral Gables, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LEVINE, CJ., DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned
President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                         |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ JAMES J. BAUMBERGER
|                        |  |  |  | Name:                   |  | James J. Baumberger                  
|                        |  |  |  | Title:                  |  | President and chief executive officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2153 Referred in House (RFH)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2153

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 1996

      Referred to the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States Post Office building located in Brewer, 
Maine, as the ``Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain Post Office Building'', and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JOSHUA LAWRENCE CHAMBERLAIN POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    The United States Post Office building located at 22 Parkway South, 
Brewer, Maine, shall be known and designated as the ``Joshua Lawrence 
Chamberlain Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, record, or other 
paper of the United States to the United States Post Office building 
referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain Post Office Building''.

            Passed the Senate September 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                             KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a),
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: May 1, 2012



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David Gladstone    
|David Gladstone        
|Chief Executive Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GARY R. MCGRIFF

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1160

[ January 3, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312009CF001615A

.

Gary R. McGriff, Jasper, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Netopia, Inc. and subsidiary:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-74943) on Form S-8 of Netopia, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
October 29, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Netopia, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1999, annual
report on Form 10-K of Netopia, Inc. and to the reference to our firm under the
heading "Selected Financial Data" in the annual report on Form 10-K.

                                             /s/ KPMG LLP

                                             San Francisco, California
                                             December 29, 1999

                                       1
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                   (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                              YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,            
                                                                        --------------------------------------
                                                                          1995           1996           1997
                                                                        --------       --------       --------
<S>                                                                     <C>            <C>            <C> 
Net income (loss).................................................      $  2,506       $  3,701       $   (529)
                                                                        ========       ========       ========
Weighted average number of common stock outstanding...............         9,148          9,890         11,335

Number of common stock equivalents as a result of stock
  options outstanding using the treasury stock method.............           374            997            --
Number of common stock assumed issued and stock options
  granted in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83.....           369            184            --
                                                                        --------       --------       --------
    Shares used in per share calculation..........................         9,891         11,071         11,335
                                                                        ========       ========       ========
Net income (loss) per share.......................................      $   0.25       $   0.33       $  (0.05)
                                                                        ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>