alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Bernard F.Denoyer, certify that:

1)     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CallistoPharmaceuticals, Inc.

2)     Based onmy knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5)     The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions);

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 14, 2007 |                      |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                       | /s/ BERNARD F. DENOYER    |
|                       | Bernard F. Denoyer        |
|                       | *Vice President, Finance* |

 

----
#### TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, Petitioner v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 93-1429.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Nov. 23, 1993.

Robert H. Benna, David Withnell and Patrick A. Johnson were on the motion to dismiss for petitioner.

Jill L. Hall, was on the motion to dismiss for respondent.

Before: WALD, SILBERMAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM:

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (“Tennessee”) petitions for review of two Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“Commission”) orders. The first order denied Tennessee’s request to impose a “reconciliation surcharge” upon its customers. The second order denied Tennessee’s request for rehearing. *See Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.,*56 FERC ¶ 61,342 (Aug. 30, 1991); and *Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.,*63 FERC ¶ 61,176 (May 7, 1993).

On June 7, 1993, Tennessee filed a “Request for Clarification or Rehearing” of the Commission’s May 7th order. On July 6, 1993, Tennessee filed this petition for review. Tennessee believed it was required to seek judicial review within 60 days of the Commission’s order dismissing its first request for rehearing. *See*15 U.S.C. § 717r (providing for the filing of a petition for review within 60 days of the Commission’s disposition of a request for rehearing). Tennessee’s June 7 request remains pending before the Commission. *See Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.,*No. RP91-203-031 (July 7, 1993) (“Order Granting Rehearing Solely for the Purpose of Further Consideration”).

It is well-established that a party may not simultaneously seek both agency reconsideration and judicial review of an agency’s order. *See Wade v. FCC,*986 F.2d 1433 (D.C.Cir.1993) (per curiam) (citing cases).1 Moreover, the court has characterized a petition for review filed while a re*981quest for agency reconsideration is pending as “incurably premature.” *See TeleSTAR, Inc. v. FCC,*888 F.2d 132, 133-34 (D.C.Cir.1989) (per curiam) (holding that a premature petition for review must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction); *United Transportation Union v. ICC,*871 F.2d 1114, 1116-18 (D.C.Cir.1989) (same).

The same principle applies here. As the parties recognize, Tennessee’s initial request for rehearing was a prerequisite to judicial review. *See*15 U.S.C. § 717r. By filing its *second*request for agency rehearing, which was *not*required by statute, Tennessee chose “between rehearing before the agency or immediate court review.” *TeleSTAR,*888 F.2d at 134.

Accordingly, we hold that Tennessee’s petition for review is “incurably premature” and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Once the Commission has resolved the pending request for rehearing, Tennessee may petition for review of that order as well as the two prior orders. The Commission’s motion to dismiss is

*Granted.*

1

. The court in *Wade*also held that timing is irrelevant — "the danger of wasted judicial effort ... arises whether a party seeks agency reconsideration before, simultaneously with, or after filing an appeal or petition for judicial review.” 986 F.2d at 1434.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT (23)(b)





The Board of Directors
Professionals Group Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-34359 and 333-34361) on Forms S-8 of Professionals Group, Inc. of our report
dated February 23, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Professionals Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income,
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 1998, and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of
Professionals Group, Inc.

The consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule
give retroactive effect to the merger of Professionals Group, Inc., and
Physicians Protective Trust Fund, on July 1, 1998, which has been accounted for
as a pooling of interests business combination.

/s/KPMG LLP

East Lansing, Michigan
March 21, 2000
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-4) and related Prospectus of Pacific Gulf Properties Inc. related to its Offer
to Exchange up to all of its 8.375% Convertible Subordinated Debentures Due 2001
for shares of its Common Stock, of our reports: (a) dated February 9, 1996, with
respect to the consolidated and combined financial statements and related
financial statement schedule of Pacific Gulf Properties Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 1995, (b) dated
April 30, 1996, with respect to the statement of revenues and certain expenses
of Tukwila Business Park included in its Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 7,
1996, (c) dated April 12, 1996, with respect to the combined statement of
revenues and certain expenses of the Konwiser Acquisition Properties included in
its Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 7, 1996, and (d) dated July 28, 1995,
with respect to the combined statement of revenues and certain expenses of the
Konwiser Acquisition Properties included in its Current Report on Form 8-K/A
dated May 7, 1996, all of which have been filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Newport Beach, California
September 27, 1996
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Form          10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: August 14, 2008
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
---

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Lawrence J. Finn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Terax Energy, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
responsible establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and
we have:

a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

Date: November 20, 2006

/s/ Lawrence J. Finn
  Lawrence J. Finn 
  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) 
  and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

---
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 34 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 35 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 36 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 37 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 38 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 39 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 40 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 41 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 42 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 43 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 44 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 45 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 46 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 47 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 48 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 49 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 50 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 51 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 52 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 53 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 54 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 55 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 56 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 57 of 58
EPA SANITIZED Page 58 of 58
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1927

To prohibit 401(k) plans from investing in collectibles and to require certain

401(k) plans to provide to participants annual, detailed reports on the

investments made by such plans.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28, 1996

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To prohibit 401(k) plans from investing in collectibles and

to require certain 401(k) plans to provide to participants

annual, detailed reports on the investments made by

such plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. 401(k) PLANS PROHIBITED FROM INVESTING IN

4 COLLECTIBLES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 401(k)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to cash

7 or deferred arrangements) is amended by adding at the

8 end the following new subparagraph:
2

•S 1927 IS

1 ‘‘(D) INVESTMENT IN COLLECTIBLES

2 TREATED AS DISTRIBUTIONS.—The rules of

3 section 408(m) shall apply to a cash or deferred

4 arrangement of any employer.’’

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

6 subsection (a) shall apply to plan years beginning after

7 the date of the enactment of this Act.

8 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT OF ANNUAL, DETAILED INVEST9 MENT REPORTS APPLIED TO CERTAIN 401(k)

10 PLANS.

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 401(k)

12 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to cash

13 or deferred arrangements), as amended by section 1, is

14 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara15 graph:

16 ‘‘(E) ANNUAL, DETAILED INVESTMENT RE17 PORTS REQUIRED.—

18 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—A cash or deferred

19 arrangement of any employer with less

20 than 100 participants shall not be treated

21 as a qualified cash or deferred arrange22 ment unless the plan of which it is a part

23 provides to each participant an annual in24 vestment report detailing the name of each

25 investment acquired during such plan year
3

•S 1927 IS

1 and the date and cost of such acquisition,

2 the name of each investment sold during

3 such year and the date and net proceeds of

4 such sale, and the overall rate of return for

5 all investments for such year.

6 ‘‘(ii) EXCEPTION.—Clause (i) shall

7 not apply with respect to any participant

8 described in section 404(c) of the Em9 ployee Retirement Income Security Act of

10 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1104(c)).’’

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

12 subsection (a) shall apply to plan years beginning after

13 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
ASTM Solid Fuel Appliance Test Methods

• ASTM E2515 - 11 Standard Test Method for Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions 

Collected by a Dilution Tunnel

• ASTM E2779 - 10 Standard Test Method for Determining Particulate Matter Emissions from 

Pellet Heaters

• ASTM E2780 - 10 Standard Test Method for Determining Particulate Matter Emissions from 

Wood Heaters

• ASTM E2817 - 11 Standard Test Method for Test Fueling Masonry Heaters

• ASTM E2618 - 09 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Particulate Emissions and 

Heating Efficiency of Outdoor Solid Fuel Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances

• ASTM E2618 Partial Thermal Storage Hydronic Heater Annex –Work in Progress

• ASTM E2558 - 09 Standard Test Method for Determining Particulate Matter Emissions from 

Fires in Wood Burning Fireplaces
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2


                       [LETTERHEAD OF COOPERS & LYBRAND]


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on
Form S-8 of Micro Therapeutics, Inc. for the Employee Stock Purchase Plan of
our report dated December 2, 1996 on our audit of the financial statements of
Micro Therapeutics, Inc. as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for the years
ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for the period from inception (June 11,
1993) through December 31, 1993, which report is included in the Prospectus and
Form SB-2.


/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
------------------------------
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Newport Beach, California
March 13, 1997
Stephen E. Earle MD and

Stephen E. Earle MD



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 16, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00753

- CV

Robert SCHRADE

, Appellant

v.

Stephen E. EARLE MD and Stephen E. Earle MD PA,

Appellee s

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 03779

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee ’ s Motion for Leave to File Amended Brief is GRANTED. Appellee ’ s amended brief is due no later than April 18, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2064

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the program of research

on breast cancer.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 11, 1996

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to extend the

program of research on breast cancer.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Breast Cancer Re5 search Extension Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PROGRAM OF RESEARCH ON

7 BREAST CANCER.

8 Section 417B(b)(1) of the Public Health Service Act

9 (42 U.S.C. 2861–8(b)(1)) is amended to read as follows:
2

S 2064 IS

1 ‘‘(1) BREAST CANCER.—For the purpose of carrying

2 out section 417(c), there are authorized to be appropriated

3 $575,000,000 for fiscal year 1997, and such sum as may

4 be necessary for each of the fiscal years 1998 through

5 2001. Such authorizations of appropriations are in addi6 tion to the authorizations of appropriations established in

7 subsection (a) with respect to such purpose.’’

Æ
II

Calendar No. 417

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1788

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway Labor Act

to repeal those provisions of Federal law that require employees to

pay union dues or fees as a condition of employment, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 21, 1996

Mr. FAIRCLOTH introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

MAY 22, 1996

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and the Railway

Labor Act to repeal those provisions of Federal law

that require employees to pay union dues or fees as

a condition of employment, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Right to

5 Work Act of 1995’’.
2

•S 1788 PCS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELA2 TIONS ACT.

3 (a) RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES.—Section 7 of the Na4 tional Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 157) is amended

5 by striking ‘‘except to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘au6 thorized in section 8(a)(3)’’.

7 (b) UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES.—Section 8 of the

8 National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 158) is amend9 ed—

10 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by striking ‘‘: Provided

11 That’’ and all that follows through ‘‘retaining mem12 bership’’;

13 (2) in subsection (b)—

14 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or to

15 discriminate’’ and all that follows through ‘‘re16 taining membership’’; and

17 (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘covered

18 by an agreement authorized under subsection

19 (a)(3)’’;

20 (3) in subsection (f)—

21 (A) by striking paragraph (2); and

22 (B) by redesignating paragraphs (3) and

23 (4) as paragraphs (2) and (3), respectively.

24 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT.

25 Section 2 of the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 152)

26 is amended by striking paragraph Eleventh.
3

•S 1788 PCS

1 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 This Act shall take effect on January 1, 1997.
Calendar No. 417

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1788

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act and

and for other purposes.union dues or fees as a condition of employment,of Federal law that require employees to paythe Railway Labor Act to repeal those provisions

MAY 22, 1996

Read the second time and placed on the calendar