alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the Month of November, 2007
 
 JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES N.V.
  
 
 þ o
 
 
 o þ




---



##### 



TABLE OF CONTENTS
 Safe Harbor Statement
    
    
    3Exhibit Index
    
    
    4Signatures
    
    
    5EXHIBIT 99.1EXHIBIT 99.2
  2




---



##### Table of Contents



Safe Harbor Statement
  
    
    expectations about the timing and amount of payments to the Asbestos Injuries
Compensation Fund (AICF), a special purpose fund for the compensation of proven
asbestos-related personal injury and death claims;
    
    expectations with respect to the effect on our financial statements of those payments;
    
    statements as to the possible consequences of proceedings brought against us and
certain of our former directors and officers by the Australian Securities & Investments
Commission;
    
    expectations that our credit facilities will be extended or renewed;
    
    projections of our operating results or financial condition;
    
    statements regarding our plans, objectives or goals, including those relating to
competition, acquisitions, dispositions and our products;
    
    statements about our future performance; and
    
    statements about product or environmental liabilities.
   3




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    DescriptionExhibit 99.1
    
    Daily share buy-back notice  Appendix 3E  Filed with
the Australian Stock Exchange on November 28, 2007Exhibit 99.2
    
    False claims against James Hardie  Filed with the
Australian Stock Exchange on November 28, 2007
 4




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  James Hardie Industries N.V.Date: November 29, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Russell ChenuRussell ChenuManaging Director 5




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    DescriptionExhibit 99.1
    
    Daily share buy-back notice  Appendix 3E  Filed with
the Australian Stock Exchange on November 28, 2007Exhibit 99.2
    
    False claims against James Hardie  Filed with the
Australian Stock Exchange on November 28, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

Certification under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
March 31, 2010 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Report), we, John A. B. Davies, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, and Lorelle L. Fritsch, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(a) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John A. B. Davies, Jr.John A. B. Davies, Jr.Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 13, 2010/s/ Lorelle L. FritschLorelle L. FritschChief Financial OfficerDate: August 13, 2010




46
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 18
- 00739
- CV

In re Charles Hamilton, Jr.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Charles Hamilton, Jr. , an inmate in the Texas Department of Cri minal Justice, has filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus complaining that the trial court erred by denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence imposed in connection with his 2009 felony
conviction for burglary

. Hamilton argues that the trial court improperly admitted certain evidence during the punishment phase of the 2009 trial, and he requests that this Court order the
trial court to res entence him

.

The relief requested in this petition amounts to relief that is available through a
writ of h abeas corpus pu rsuant to article 11.07 of the C ode of C riminal P rocedure

. S ee Tex.
Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3. T his Court is withou t jurisdiction to grant relief in such cases.
See Ex parte Rich , 194 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“We hav e long held that a claim of an illegal sentence is cognizable on a writ of habeas corpus.”) ; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W.2d 241, 242

- 43 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991 ).

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.2 __________ ________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Bourland
Filed: November 16, 2018
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01422]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; National 
Centers for Translational Research in Reproduction and Infertility 
(P50 Clinical Trial Optional).
    Date: March 28-29, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6710B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jagpreet Singh Nanda, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, NIH, 6710B Rockedge Drive, Room 2125D, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-4454, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#610b000611130404154f0f000f0500210f08094f060e17"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b717a7c6b697e7e6f35757a757f7a5b757273357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 19, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01422 Filed 1-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of G REIT Liquidating Trust
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             By:
    /s/ H.K. DESAIH.K. DesaiChief Executive Officer
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Craig Moss, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1084 C.D. 2019

:

Pennsylvania Board :

of Probation and Parole, :

Respondent :

O R D E R

NOW, June 15, 2020, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

application for reargument, the application is denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7919

LORENZO BUTTS, JR., 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

JON MICHAEL BABINEAU, Attorney, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:08-cv-00309-JBF-TEM) 

Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 16, 2009 

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lorenzo Butts, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Lorenzo Butts appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (2006), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. 

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Butts v. Babineau, 

No. 2:08-cv-00309-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va. July 28, 2008). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50355 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MANUEL HERNANDEZ-CASTORENA, ALSO KNOWN AS ANGEL ACEVEDO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-00-CR-2089-ALL-DB

-------------------- December 11, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Manuel Hernandez-Castorena (Hernandez) argues that he is entitled to be resentenced because the district court failed to verify that counsel had read and discussed his presentence report (PSR) with him prior to sentencing as required by F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32(c)(3)(A). We agree that the district court failed to comply with Rule 32(c)(3)(A). However, because Hernandez did not raise the issue of noncompliance in the district court, we will correct the error only if it was plain and affected Hernandez’s substantial rights.No. 01-50355 -2- See United States v. Esparza-Gonzalez , 268 F.3d 272, 273-74 (5th Cir. 2001); see also United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 732-34 (1993). Hernandez failed to object to the Rule 32(c)(3)(A) violation in the district court. He does not argue that he did not review or discuss his PSR with his attorney; instead, he relies on the absence of any record evidence to indicate that he reviewed and discussed the PSR with counsel. Thus, Hernandez has not demonstrated that he was prejudiced by the court’s failure to comply with Rule 32(c)(3)(A). Because Hernandez has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating prejudice, he has not established plain error. See United States v. Vasquez , 216 F.3d at 456, 459 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 972 (2000). The district court’s failure to advise Hernandez that he had the right to be assisted by counsel if he elected to proceed to a jury trial was harmless.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Rasmussen,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gary Rasmussen


Gary Rasmussen,


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





August 19, 2009
uhyllpletter.htm


February 6, 2012


 


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington D.C.  20549


 


Re:  Ecology Coatings, Inc.


 


Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


We have read Item 4.01 of Form 8-K concerning our firm dated February 3, 2012, of Ecology Coatings, Inc.


that we understand the Company intends to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on


February 6, 2012, and are in agreement with the statements contained in the second, third and fourth


paragraphs therein.  We have no basis to agree or disagree with other statements of the registrant contained


therein.


 


Very truly yours,


 


UHY LLP
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1757 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1757

                       One Hundred Fourth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights 
             Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Developmental Disabilities 
Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of 1996''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

    Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill 
of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended by striking ``the fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 
1999''.
SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROTECTION AND 
ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.
    Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill 
of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended by striking ``the fiscal 
years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 through 
1999''.
SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO UNIVERSITY 
AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.
    Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and 
Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is amended by striking ``the 
fiscal years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 
through 1999''.
SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO PROJECTS OF NATIONAL 
SIGNIFICANCE.
    Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and 
Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is amended by striking ``the 
fiscal years 1995 and 1996'' and inserting ``the fiscal years 1995 
through 1999''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Donald E.W. CHALUPA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 01-10651.

D.C. No. CR-00-00476-PGR.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*445Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.*

Decided Jan. 21, 2003.

Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Donald E.W. Chalupa appeals the judgment of conviction and his 35-month sentence following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). His attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a brief stating that counsel cannot identify any nonfrivolous issues for review.

We have conducted an independent review of the record and the briefs on appeal pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 82-83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), which disclosed that Chalupa knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his conviction and he was sentenced within the terms of the plea agreement. Accordingly, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. *United States v. Martinez,*143 F.3d 1266, 1270-72 (9th Cir. 1998) (enforcing waiver of right to appeal where waiver is knowing and voluntary and sentence is in accordance with plea agreement).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1872

To amend section 922(x)(5) of title 18, United States Code, relating to

the prohibition of possession of a handgun by a minor, to change the

definition of minor from under 18 years of age to under 21 years

of age.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 1996

Mr. SIMON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend section 922(x)(5) of title 18, United States Code,

relating to the prohibition of possession of a handgun

by a minor, to change the definition of minor from

under 18 years of age to under 21 years of age.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO THE YOUTH HANDGUN SAFE4 TY LAW.

5 Section 922(x)(5) of title 18, United States Code, is

6 amended by striking ‘‘18 years’’ and inserting ‘‘21 years’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1814 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1814

To provide for liquidation or reliquidation of certain television sets 
   to correct an error that was made in connection with the original 
                              liquidation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 1996

 Mr. Graham (for himself and Mr. Mack) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for liquidation or reliquidation of certain television sets 
   to correct an error that was made in connection with the original 
                              liquidation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ENTRIES.

    (a) Liquidation or Reliquidation of Entries.--Notwithstanding 
sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 
1520), or any other provision of law, the United States Customs Service 
shall, not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, liquidate or reliquidate those entry numbers made at New York, New 
York, which are listed in subsection (c), in accordance with the final 
results of the administrative review, covering the period from May 1, 
1984, through March 31, 1985, undertaken by the International Trade 
Administration of the Department of Commerce for such entries (case 
number A-580-008).
    (b) Payment of Amounts Owed.--Any amounts owed by the United States 
pursuant to the liquidation or reliquidation of an entry under 
subsection (a) shall be paid by the Customs Service within 90 days 
after such liquidation or reliquidation.
    (c) Entry List.--The entries referred to in subsection (a) are the 
following:

                                                                        
                    Entry Number                 Date of Entry          
                                                                        
              84-4426808.............  August 29, 1984                  
              84-4427823.............  September 4, 1984                
              84-4077985.............  July 25, 1984                    
              84-4080859.............  August 3, 1984                   
              84-4080817.............  August 3, 1984                   
              84-4077723.............  August 1, 1984                   
              84-4075194.............  July 10, 1984                    
              84-4076481.............  July 17, 1984                    
              84-4080930.............  August 9, 1984.                  
                                                                        

                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cal Bay International, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger E. Pawson, Chief
Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof) and Chief Financial Officer
(or equivalent thereof) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                               /s/ Roger E. Pawson
                              -------------------------
                              Roger E. Pawson
                              Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              Chief Financial Officer
                              May 12, 2006