alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-05-0362-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	MARCH 20, 2006

	______________________________

	VINCE ARTHUR HALL, 

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 49,685-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	Appellant, Vince Arthur Hall, appeals from an order revoking his community supervision.  Originally, he was convicted of possessing a controlled substance upon his plea of guilty in accordance with a plea agreement.  Imposition of his five-year prison sentence was suspended on May 6, 2005, and the trial court placed him on community supervision for five years.  Thereafter, the State moved to revoke his probation alleging that he violated four conditions of same.  At the hearing on his motion, he pled true to violating one condition and acknowledged violating at least one more while undergoing examination.  Thereafter, the trial court granted the motion to revoke and ordered that he now serve the original five-year sentence.  

	Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw,  together with an Anders1  brief wherein she certified that, after diligently searching the record, she has concluded that the appeal is without merit.  So too did she represent to this court that she copied appellant with her brief and informed him of both her belief that there was no reversible error and his right to file a response or brief pro se.  By letter dated February 21, 2006, this court also informed appellant of his right to tender his own brief or response by March 23, 2006.  Appellant filed a response on March 13, 2006.

	In compliance with the principles discussed in Anders, appellate counsel discussed  several potential areas of appeal and then explained why the trial court’s order was sound.  We too reviewed the record, sua sponte, and found no arguably meritorious issue.  Nor did we find any of the conclusory allegations in appellant’s response arguably meritorious.   

	There being no issue warranting reversal of the trial court’s order revoking appellant’s community supervision, we affirm it and also grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw.

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice 

Do not publish.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (i) | the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 26, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                        
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|                    | 
|Dated: June 7, 2004 |  | /s/ JOHN M. PALUMBO                    
|                    |  | John M. Palumbo Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1749 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1749

 To amend title 38, sections 8101(2) and 8109(h)(3)(B), United States 
  Code, to delete the references therein to ``working drawings'' and 
   substitute therefor the words ``construction documents,'' and to 
 further delete the references therein to ``preliminary plans'' and to 
         substitute therefor the words ``design development.''

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1996

  Mr. Simpson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, sections 8101(2) and 8109(h)(3)(B), United States 
  Code, to delete the references therein to ``working drawings'' and 
   substitute therefor the words ``construction documents,'' and to 
 further delete the references therein to ``preliminary plans'' and to 
         substitute therefor the words ``design development.''

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That section 8101(2) 
and section 8109(h)(3)(B) of title 38, United States Code, are 
amended--
    Sec. 2. By striking the words ``working drawings'' each time they 
appear and to substitute therefor in each instance the words 
``construction documents.''
    Sec. 3. By striking the words ``preliminary plans'' each time they 
appear to substitute therefor in each instance the words ``design 
development.''
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-24047 and Form S-8 No. 333-57799) pertaining to the Keystone
Automotive Industries, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, of
our report dated May 28, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Keystone Automotive Industries, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 26, 1999.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Los Angeles, California
June 22, 1999
NO. 07-03-0297-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	SEPTEMBER 29, 2003

	______________________________

	SHAWN O’CONNELL LEWIS,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 108TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 44,391-E; HON. RICHARD DAMBOLD, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	Appellant Shawn O’Connell Lewis appeals his conviction for the offense of driving while intoxicated.  The clerk’s record is due in this cause, and an extension of the applicable deadline was sought.  To justify the extension, the clerk represented that appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for the record.  Nothing of record appears showing whether the appellant is indigent and entitled to a free record. 

	Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 108th District Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings.  Upon remand, the trial court shall  immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing to determine the following: 

	1.  whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

     	2.  whether appellant is indigent; and

	3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record and to appointed counsel on appeal due to his indigency.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed.  So too shall it 1) execute findings of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the aforementioned hearing.  Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental record with the clerk of this court on or before October 29, 2003.  Should further time be needed by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before October 29, 2003.  Finally, should it be determined that appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, is indigent, and is entitled to appointed counsel but has none, then the trial court shall appoint counsel to appellant.  The name, address phone number and state bar number of the attorney appointed, if any, shall be included in the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.  

	It is so ordered. 

                                                                             Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1418/2006

of 26 September 2006         

amending Regulation (EC) No 2805/95 fixing the export refunds in the wine sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Articles 63(3) and 64(5) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2805/95 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 27 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2165/2005 (OJ L 345, 28.12.2005, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 291, 6.12.1995, p. 10. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 45/2006 (OJ L 8, 13.1.2006, p. 35).

----

ANNEX

                     ‘ANNEX

----
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           YEARS ENDED
                                                           SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                        ---------------------
                                                         1995          1996
                                                        ------        -------
<S>                                                     <C>           <C>
Net income............................................. $2,506        $ 3,701
                                                        ======        =======
Weighted average number of common stock outstanding....  9,148          9,890

Number of common stock equivalents as a result
  of stock options outstanding using the treasury
  stock method.........................................    374            997

Number of common stock issued and stock
 options granted in accordance with Staff
 Accounting Bulletin No. 83............................    369            184
                                                        ------        -------

      Shares used in per share calculation.............  9,891         11,071
                                                        ======        =======

Net income per share................................... $ 0.25        $  0.33
                                                        ======        =======
</TABLE>

                                      46
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Form          10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: November 18, 2008
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry
Gabby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











/s/ Terry
Gabby


Terry Gabby


Chief Financial Officer


August 14,
2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          27,892
<SECURITIES>                                    28,675
<RECEIVABLES>                                  111,348
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,783)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               174,208
<PP&E>                                          23,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,219)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 239,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,693
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,704
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,607
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   239,135
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               428,258
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  298,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,268
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,314
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,797
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1







                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in these registration
statements of DM Management Company and subsidiary on Form S-8 (File Nos.
33-71266, 33-71776, 33-72166, 33-86982 and 333-03845) of our reports dated
February 4, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of DM Management Company and subsidiary as of
December 28, 1996, June 29, 1996, and June 24, 1995, and for the six months
ended December 28, 1996 and each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
June 29, 1996, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 1997
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  Date:  November 6, 2008
    /s/ Robert J. PhillippyRobert J. PhillippyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 11013 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Michael Smith,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:23
- CR
- 166 - 1

**________________________ ______**  Before **King, Haynes,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Michael Smith has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Smith has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 8, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-11013 Document: 39-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2024No. 23
- 11013

2 review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respo nsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-11013 Document: 39-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2024
# Driving Green Energy Movement

• Energy Self-Reliance • California Global Warming Solution Act- AB32 • Law which sets California Green House Gas (GHG) emission standards for the next 50 years. • To 1990 levels by 2025 • To be reduced 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 • Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS): A regulation that requires the increased production of energy from renewable energy sources. • 20% by 2010 • 33% by 2020

# Land Use

3 • Imperial County extends over 4,597 square miles. • Largest land owner is the Federal government (49.6%) • 22.7% is private land in the desert/mountains • 18.1% is irrigated agricultural land • Ag Land Conversion Issue

# comparison

# discussion

# Solar PV Energy
• 18 – # of Projects • 2,050 – Total MW • $10 B – Capital Investment

# north

# south

# Geothermal Energy

*Ormat Brawley North plant, August 2008 • 10 - # of New Projects • 515 - Total MW • $3 B – Capital Investment • 2nd largest geothermal energy producing county in the nation

# KGRA’s in Imperial County

# Wind Energy

• 2 - # of Projects • 400 - Total MW • 300 - Construction Jobs • 75 - Operations & Maintenance Jobs • $1Billion + in Capital Investment

# Challenges

• Transmission • Financing • Water/Salton Sea • Land Use • Labor Issues • Environmental/Cultural Resources13

# Project Summary
• 117-mile electric transmission line, capable of delivering 1,000 megawatts of clean, reliable energy • Project submitted in August 2005 • Approved by the CPUC and US BLM • Final approval by USFS – July 2010 • $1.883 billion project • 2010 – Construction start • Mid 2012 – In-service date 14

# iid

# Questions
Exhibit 32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the amended quarterly report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tyram H. Pettit, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Vice PresidentFinance of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
 
 Date: February 6, 2005
 /s/ Tyram H. PettitTyram H. PettitPresident, Chief Executive Officer, and Vice PresidentFinance (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
 20
### ATTACHEMENT G


### HEARING CERTIFICATION This certifies in accordance with the provisions of Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51 .102 that the following actions were taken regarding amendment of R .C.S.A
. sections 22a-174-36b and 22a-174-27(e) : 1) The public hearingwas held on December 18, 2008 as announced in the notice of hearing (copy attached) ; 2) In accordance with the notice, materials were available for review in each Air Quality Control Region (AQCR) in Connecticut; 3) Copies ofthe notice were mailed to the directors ofthe air pollution control agencies in New

York, New

Jersey, Rhode Island and Massachusetts along with a copy to the Director ofthe Air Management Division ofRegion I ofthe U .S
. Environmental Protection Agency; and 4) The notice ofhearingwas published in newspapers as follows: Newspq~er, AQCR Connecticut Law

Journal Connecticut Post (Bridgeport) 43 Hartford Courant 42 New London Day 41 The Register Citizen (Torrington) 44

December 18s 2008 Date Date November 18, 2008 November 18, 2008 November 18, 2008 November 18, 2008 November 1

Bureau ofAir Management Patrice P
. Kelly
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                               AMENDMENT NO. TWO
                             POST PROPERTIES, INC.
                              EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN

     Pursuant to the power reserved in section 17 of the Post Properties, Inc.
Employee Stock Plan and in connection with the approval granted by the
shareholders of Post Properties, Inc., section 3, Shares Reserved Under the
Plan, is hereby amended to delete 1,200,000 from the first sentence thereof and
to insert in its place "3,500,000."


     This Amendment to the Post Properties, Inc. Employee Stock Plan shall be
effective as of the date that the shareholders of Post Properties, Inc. adopted
the Amendment to the Plan.


                                     POST PROPERTIES, INC.



                                     By: /s/ Sherry W. Cohen
                                         --------------------------
                                         Sherry W. Cohen
                                         Senior Vice President and Secretary

                                     Date: October 24, 1997
Exhibit 99.1
 
  
 Shopoff Properties Trust Acquires
Winchester Hills Residential Units in Riverside County, California
  
    About Shopoff Properties Trust
  more




---



##### 



Forward Looking Statements