alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Flamel Technologies S.A. (the "Company”) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Michael S. Anderson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|/s/ Michael S. Anderson | 
|----------------------- | 
|Michael S. Anderson     | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|April 30, 2014          |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00341-CR

Cameron Thomas Fountain

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1322169D)

June 11, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Company
 Subsidiaries
    
    State of Incorporation1. Grubb & Ellis Advisers of California, Inc.
    
    California2. Grubb & Ellis Affiliates, Inc.
    
    Delaware3. Grubb & Ellis of Arizona, Inc.
    
    Washington4. Grubb & Ellis Europe, Inc.
    
    California5. Grubb & Ellis Institutional Properties, Inc.
    
    California6. Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. (GEMS)
    
    DelawareSubsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc.:a. Grubb & Ellis Management Services of Michigan, Inc. (GEMS of Michigan)
    
    Michiganb. Grubb & Ellis Management Services of Canada, Inc.
    
    Canadac. GEMS Mexicana, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
    
    Mexicod. GEMS of Sweden, AB
    
    Swedene. GEMS Korea, LLC
    
    Koreaf. Middle East Real Estate Services, LLC
    
    Delaware7. Grubb & Ellis Mortgage Group, Inc.
    
    California8. Grubb & Ellis New York, Inc.
    
    New York9. Grubb & Ellis of Michigan, Inc.
    
    Michigan10. Grubb & Ellis of Nevada, Inc.
    
    Nevada11.
Grubb & Ellis Consulting Services Company
    
    FloridaSubsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Consulting Services Company:a. Landauer Hospitality International, Inc.
    
    Delawareb. Landauer Securities, Inc.
    
    Massachusetts12. HSM Inc.
    
    Texas13. Wm. A. White/Grubb & Ellis, Inc.
    
    New York14. GERA Property Acquisition LLC
    
    DelawareSubsidiaries of GERA Property Acquisition LLCa. GERA 6400 Shafer LLC
    
    Delawareb. GERA Abrams Centre LLC
    
    Delawarec. GERA Danbury LLC
    
    Delaware




---



##### 



Subsidiaries
    
    State of Incorporation15. NNN Realty Advisors, Inc.
    
    Delawarea. Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC
    
    VirginiaSubsidiaries of Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC1. NNN/ROC Apartment Holdings, LLC
    
    Virginia2. NNN Collateralized Senior Notes, LLC
    
    Delaware3. NNN Mission Residential Holdings, LLC
    
    Virginia4. Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Advisor, LLC
    
    Delaware5. Grubb & Ellis Healthcare REIT Management, LLC
    
    Virginia6. Grubb & Ellis Apartment REIT Advisor, LLC
    
    Virginia7. Grubb & Ellis Apartment Management, LLC
    
    Virginia8. NNN Park At Spring Creek Leaseco, LP
    
    Texas9. NNN 6320 Lamar, LLC
    
    Virginia10. NNN Rocky Mountain Exchange, LLC
    
    Virginia11. NNN Met Center 10 SPE, LLC
    
    Delaware12. NNN Southpointe, LLC
    
    Delaware13. NNN/SOF Avallon Member, LLC
    
    Delawarea. NNN/SOF
Avallon, LLC
    
    Delaware14. NNN 200 Galleria Member, LLC
    
    Delawarea. NNN 200
Galleria, LLC
    
    Delaware15. Grubb & Ellis Housing, LLC
    
    Virginiaa. NNN St. Charles Leaseco, LLC
    
    Delawareb. NNN Sanctuary at Highland Oaks Leaseco,
LLC
    
    Delawareb. Triple Net Properties Realty, Inc.
    
    Californiac. Grubb & Ellis Residential Management, Inc.
    
    Delawared. Grubb
& Ellis Alesco Global Advisors, LLC (Alesco)
    
    Californiae. Grubb & Ellis Securities, Inc.
    
    Californiaf. Grubb
& Ellis Investment Advisors, LLC
    
    Delaware
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.27


SECOND AMENDMENT TO NOVEMBER 20, 2014 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.




WHEREAS, FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the “Company”) has heretofore entered into an Employment Agreement dated November 20, 2014 (the “Agreement”), amended by a First Amendment to November 20, 2014 Employment Agreement dated August 14, 2015 (“First Amendment”), by and between Karen D. Turner (the “Executive”) and the Company and the parties thereto desire to amend the Agreement in the manner set forth below. 


NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned parties to the Agreement agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows, and that there is mutual, adequate and lawful consideration the receipt of which each acknowledges through execution of this Second Amendment. 


		
	1.
	The Term of Employment as defined in Section 2 of the Agreement, and as amended in Paragraph 1 of the First Amendment, shall continue through December 31, 2019, unless terminated sooner or renewed as provided in the Agreement. 




		
	2.
	Except as specifically provided above, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




Wherefore, the parties hereto agree to this Second Amendment, with the foregoing changes being effective as of November 21, 2016.


FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.




/s/ Paul H. Sunu                        
By:    Paul H. Sunu
Title:    Chief Executive Officer


EXECUTIVE




/s/ Karen D. Turner                        
Karen D. Turner
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELIZABETH COLTON, Plaintiff,


### v. HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON, Defendant. ) ) ) ) 

### ) Civil Case No. 09-1772 (RJL) ) ) ) ) 

### FINALJUDGMENT Forthe reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion enteredthis date, it is this

# ~**~** day ofSeptember, 2010, hereby 

### ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment 

### [#l3] is 

### GRANTED; and it is further 

### ORDERED thatplaintiffs Rule 

### 56(f) Motion for Discovery [#19] is 

### DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further 

### ORDERED that the above-captioned case be 

### DISMISSED with prejudice. 

### SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Stephen Brock, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Public Company Management Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Public Company Management Corporation.





By:/s/ Stephen Brock

Stephen Brock

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

February 14, 2005
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE           CONTACT:
                                Paul Spindler
                                Executive Vice President
                                Bristol Technology Systems, Inc.
                                (714) 475-0800


                           BRISTOL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS
                           TO ACQUIRE SEATTLE COMPANY

        IRVINE, CA, Dec. 16, 1996 -- Bristol Technology Systems, Inc.
(BTEC:NASDAQ), today announced it has executed a definitive agreement to
acquire Automated Retail Systems, Inc. (ARS), of Seattle for cash and stock.
Specific terms of the transaction were not disclosed. Bristol said it
anticipates closing the acquisition on or about Jan. 1, 1997.

        ARS is a point-of-sale (POS) systems dealer for NCR, Panasonic, IBM and
ICL Fujitsu equipment. It sells installs, and services POS systems from these
manufacturers at supermarkets, quick service food outlets, restaurants, and
other retail establishments. ARS also has a sales and service division in the
San Francisco Bay area.

        Richard H. Walker, Bristol president and chief executive officer, said 
ARS is the dominant POS dealer in the state of Washington and "will serve as the
hub operation for Bristol in the Pacific Northwest." He said Bristol would
pursue additional, acquisitions in the Northwest and Northern California to
expand the ARS presence there.

        ARS will operate under its current management as a subsidiary of 
Bristol, added Walker. He said Michael J. Pollastro, principal ARS owner, has
agreed to continue as President and Chief Executive Officer under a long term
employment contract. 

        Bristol Technology Systems is engaged in acquiring and operating
point-of-sale systems dealers who sell, install and service POS systems.


                                     X X X
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cooper Industries, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Terry A. Klebe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



/s/ Terry A. Klebe
------------------------------------
Terry A. Klebe
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned President and chief executive officer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                         |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2004 |  | /s/ JAMES J. BAUMBERGER
|                     |  | Name:                   |  | James J. Baumberger                                 
|                     |  | Title:                  |  | President and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned, Ray J. Oleson the Chief Executive Officer of SI International,Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this certification in connection with thefiling with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter and six months ending June 28, 2003 (the“Report”).  The undersigned hereby certifiesthat:

 

(1)                        theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                        theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: August 11, 2003 |   | /s/                                               |   |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  |   | Name: Ray J.  Oleson                              |
|                  |   | Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1370

MIDLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY, a South Carolina Corporation,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK NA, a national banking association,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior 

District Judge. (3:12-cv-00244-MBS)

Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: October 30, 2013

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William W. Watkins, Sr., WILLIAM W. WATKINS, P.A., Columbia, 

South Carolina, for Appellant. Ronald J. Tryon, Lawrence M. 

Hershon, PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLP, Columbia, South 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Midland Mortgage Company (“Midland”) appeals the 

district court’s judgment granting Wells Fargo Bank, NA’s 

summary judgment motion on Midland’s negligence and negligent 

misrepresentation claims. We have considered Midland’s 

arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s judgment. Midland Mortgage Co. v. Wells 

Fargo Bank, NA, No. 3:12-cv-00244-MBS (D.S.C. Feb. 25, 2013). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### Ben WILFORD, Jr., Appellant, v. Electa WILFORD, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 25, 1963.

*868Henry Jack Wilson, Mayfield, for appellant.

Harry H. Boaz, Mayfield, for appellee.

PALMORE, Judge.

Appellant’s principal contention, that because the 1956 order reducing child support payments to $30.00 per month was based on a contract between the parties it cannot be reopened on the ground of changed conditions, is not well taken. The responsibility of a father to support his minor children “cannot be diminished by contract * * * And this matter of maintenance continues within the jurisdiction and control of the court, subject to modification as circumstances and conditions may demand, for there can be no final judgment as to infant children.” Pegram v. Pegram, 310 Ky. 86, 219 S.W.2d 772 (1949); Elkins v. Elkins, Ky., 359 S.W.2d 620 (1962).

Both Elkins v. Elkins, supra, and Wilson v. Wilson, 271 Ky. 631, 112 S.W.2d 980 (1938), involved situations in which, through property settlements, the husband actually had made substantial contributions toward the support of the children *in advance.*In such a case the wife is thereafter in the position of having already received from the father a fund that is to be devoted, at least in part, to the maintenance of the children. To this extent, and this extent only, as between her and the father she is primarily, and he secondarily, responsible for the support of the children. That situation does not exist in the instant case. As a matter of fact, the evidence shows that the original judgment, entered in 1954, also was based on a contract between Mr. and Mrs. Wilford. That judgment fixed the support payments at $65 per month, the same amount that has now been reinstated by the order from which this appeal is taken. If appellant’s contention were correct, he would not have been able to secure the reduction to $30 in 1956.

The cases of Boehmer v. Boehmer, 259 Ky. 69, 82 S.W.2d 199 (1935), and Smith v. Smith, 295 Ky. 50, 173 S.W.2d 813 (1943), do not hold that a contract or agreed judgment is a bar to future adjustment of child maintenance payments upon a change in conditions. The Boehmer opinion says that with certain exceptions permanent *alimony*cannot be revised. The Smith case involved the validity, vel non, of a postnuptial contract entered incident to the settlement of certain litigation, including a divorce suit, and no question was presented with respect to child support payments.

Stone v. Stone, Ky., 275 S.W.2d 910 (1955), also cited by appellant, is applicable but on a different point, which is that the chancellor’s judgment in this kind of proceeding will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous. We cannot say that the order in this case was in error.

■ The judgment is affirmed.
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: "Kudlinski James F (Jim)" <Jim.Kudlinski@srpnet.com> Date: 7/7/2010 10:56 AM Subject: Re: SRP Request for Time Extension Attachments: pic20386.jpg; SRP ICR Extension Request.pdf

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnair e unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic20386.jpg)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136570 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136570 

 COA: 280564 

Kent CC: 03-011789-FH 

SONNY AMES BAEZ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 4, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1020 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 27, 2008 

 Clerk
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 

State of Iowa 

County of Polk, ss.: 

The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath, states that The Des Moines Register and Tribune Company, a 

corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa, with .its principal place of business in 

Des Moines, Iowa, the publisher of 

THE ALTOONA HERALD-INDEX 

newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Des Moines; Polk County, Iowa, and that an 

advertisement, a printed copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" and made part of this affidavit, was printed and published 

in The Altoona Herald-Index on the following dates: 

Ad No. 

0000777874 

Start Date: 

10/14/15 

Copy of Advertisement 

Run Dates: Cost: 

10/14/15 $260.14 
t:ITll!:i:;10ns are not counted for applicability purposes and that 

· any·fugitive- dust control plan or its ·equivalent is submitted as 

. required by .the Health Officer.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2044

To provide for modification of the State agreement under title II of the

Social Security Act with the State of Pennsylvania with respect to certain

students.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 1996

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To provide for modification of the State agreement under

title II of the Social Security Act with the State of

Pennsylvania with respect to certain students.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR STUDENTS EMPLOYED BY

4 STATE SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, OR UNIVER5 SITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA.

6 Notwithstanding section 218 of the Social Security

7 Act, the agreement with the State of Pennsylvania (or any

8 modification thereof) entered into pursuant to such section

9 may, at the option of such State, be modified at any time
2

•S 2044 IS

1 before January 1, 1998, so as to exclude service performed

2 in the employ of a school, college, or university if such

3 service is performed by a student who is enrolled and is

4 regularly attending classes at such school, college, or uni5 versity.

6 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MODIFICATION.

7 Any modification of an agreement pursuant to section

8 1 shall be effective with respect to services performed after

9 the end of the calendar quarter following the calendar

10 quarter in which such agreement is modified.

11 SEC. 3. IRREVOCABILITY OF MODIFICATION.

12 If any modification of an agreement pursuant to sec13 tion 1 terminates coverage with respect to service per14 formed in the employ of a school, college, or university,

15 by a student who is enrolled and regularly attending class16 es at such school, college, or university, the Commissioner

17 of Social Security and the State may not thereafter modify

18 such agreement so as to again make the agreement appli19 cable to such service performed in the employ of such

20 school, college, or university.

Æ
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of 
Renaissance Worldwide, Inc. (formerly known as The Registry, Inc.) on Forms S-8 
(Files No.333-17565, 333-33475 and 333-44371), of our report dated February 14,
1997, except for Note 3 as to which the date is September 30, 1997, and Note 
11, as to which the date is November 26, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of The Hunter Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 1995 and 1996 and for each of the three years in the period ended December
31, 1996, which report is included in this Transition Report on Form 10-K.

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

Baltimore, Maryland
March 26, 1998
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0266

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM061AD

A320-28-1132, R03 --- 10/5/09

A320-28-1132, R02 --- 11/12/08

A320-28-1132, R01 --- 10/12/06

A320-28-1132 --- 10/13/04

A320-28-1145 --- 2/28/06

A320-53-1227, R04 --- 2/14/12

A320-53-1227, R03 --- 7/28/11

A320-53-1227, R02 --- 3/10/11

A320-53-1227, R01 --- 5/31/10

A320-53-1227 --- 3/24/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008