alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-8435 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-049-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost

(@$85/h 

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts)

Number of

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

REPLACEMENT 4.0 $ 340.00 $0 $ 340.00 60 $20,400.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $20,400

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerationsfor Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

*Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

*Explanation:

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

YES* NO

YES* NO

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

YES NO

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

*Explanation:

YES* NO
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

116)IV-K-(B)-11 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 3:22:18 PM Sheet 116 of 198 
P.2 

-83-27 

e*-t 

'ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC. 

1655 NORTH FORT MYER DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209 703/528-1900 IV-K-(B) 

January 6, 1987 

Mr. Robert Pahel-Short 

Economic Analysis Branch (MD-12) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

Subject: EPA Contract No. 68-02-4202, Work Assignment No. 18 

Industrial Fuel Prices 

Dear Robert: 

The enclosed table summarizes industrial oil and gas prices for the 

Southwest, Federal region 6. They are expressed as after-tax net 

present values. These parameters were used in IFCAM runs conducted in 

September and October 1986 and are based on EEA's 1986 industrial oil 

and gas price projections. 

Sincerely, 

/yC^\ r-r-rjjto^ 

Tim Hogan 

TH:dss 

Enclosure 

CC: Dr. A. Wehe 

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMICS / ENGINEERING 
P.3 

PROJECTED INDUSTRIAL FUEL PRICES FOR THE SOUTHWEST? 

(1985 $/MMBtu) 

High Oil Prices Low Oil Prices 

3.0% S residual fuel oil 

1.6% S residual fuel oil 

0.8% S residual fuel oil 

0.3% S residual fuel oil 

Distillate fuel oil 

Natural gas 

15.29 

16.06 

17.29 

17.90 

20.43 

14.74 

10 

11 

12 

12 

14 

11 

45 

14 

13 

62 

26 

16 

a Federal region 6. After-tax net present values used in IFCAM. Based 

on a tax rate of 50 percent, 8 percent real after-tax discount rate, and 

a 15 year period (beginning in 1987 with a two-year construction period 

and 13 years of operation, 1989-2001).
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-11013

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Michael Smith, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:23-CR-166-1

______________________________

Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Smith has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Smith has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 8, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-11013 Document: 39-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2024
No. 23-11013

2

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-11013 Document: 39-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2024
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Renovo Holdings(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Stephen Carnes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

*/s/Stephen Carnes*
Stephen Carnes

Chief Executive Officer and Chief

Executive Officer

June 21, 2005
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William G. Filer II, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William G. Filer II

William G. Filer II
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2003
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2140

To limit the use of the exclusionary rule in school disciplinary proceedings.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27, 1996

Mr. DORGAN (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. EXON, and Mr. D’AMATO)

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To limit the use of the exclusionary rule in school disciplinary

proceedings.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safer Schools Act of

5 1996’’.

6 SEC 2. SAFER SCHOOLS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 14601(b)(1) of the Gun8 Free Schools Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 8921(b)(1)) is

9 amended—
2

•S 2140 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘under this Act shall have’’ and

2 inserting the following: ‘‘under this Act—

3 ‘‘(A) shall have’’;

4 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert5 ing ‘‘; and’’; and

6 (3) by adding at the end the following:

7 ‘‘(B) beginning not later than 2 years after

8 the date of enactment of the Safer Schools Act

9 of 1996, shall have in effect a State law or reg10 ulation providing that evidence that a student

11 brought a weapon to a school under the juris12 diction of the local educational agencies in that

13 State, that is obtained as a result of a search

14 or seizure conducted on school premises, shall

15 not be excluded in any school disciplinary pro16 ceeding on the ground that the search or sei17 zure was in violation of the fourth amendment

18 to the Constitution of the United States.’’.

19 (b) REPORT TO STATE.—Section 14601(d) of the

20 Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 8921(d)) is

21 amended—

22 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the State law

23 required by’’ and inserting ‘‘each State law or regu24 lation’’; and
3

•S 2140 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘subsection

2 (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (b)(1)(A)’’.

3 (c) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Section 14601(f) of the

4 Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 8921(f)) is

5 amended by inserting ‘‘of subsection (b)(1)(A)’’ before ‘‘of

6 this’’.

Æ
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Erna Aletta Cox v. Kevin Stuart Cox

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 00521

- CV

Trial court case number: 2020

- 28443

Trial court: 247th District Court of Harris County

Appellant Erna Aletta Cox filed a notice of appeal on September 29, 2021. On

November 8, 2021, A ppellant filed in this Court a “S tatement of I nability to Afford P ayment of

Cour t Costs or an Appeal Bond .” After consideration of docum ents filed in thi s p r oc ee ding, t h e

Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that A ppellant is

allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1 (a), (c)

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Veronica Riv as

- Mo lloy

Acting individually

Date: November 16, 2021

1 “Costs ” are defined as filing fees charged by the Court of Appeals. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

20.1 (a)

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We have issued our report dated August 6, (except for Note J, as to which the
date is September 30, 1996) accompanying the financial statements of Inland
Casino Corporation appearing in the fiscal 1996 Annual Report of the Company to
its shareholders included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended June 30, 1996, which are incorporated by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (1995 Stock Option Plan). We consent to the incorporated 
by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the aforementioned 
report.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Los Angeles, California
January 13, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                    UNITED PAYORS & UNITED PROVIDERS, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                                  (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Years Ended December 31,
                                                                  1996                       1995
                                                             --------------              ------------
<S>                                                          <C>                         <C>
                                           PRIMARY

Net income (loss)                                               $10,645,799                 $(710,641)
                                                             ==============              ============

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
   Shares outstanding from beginning of period                    8,800,000                 8,800,000
   Initial public offering                                        1,327,870                         -
   Other issuances of common stock                                    2,789                         -
   Purchases of treasury stock                                       (5,060)                        -
   Common stock equivalents:
Additional equivalent shares issuable from assumed
   exercise of common stock options                                     100                         -
                                                             --------------              ------------

Weighted average common and common share equivalent              10,125,699                 8,800,000
                                                             ==============              ============

Net income (loss) per common share                                    $1.05                    ($0.08)
                                                             ==============              ============

</TABLE>

Vote: The computation of fully diluted earnings per share has not been presented
      as the resultant earnings per common share ($1.06) would reflect the
      antidilutive effect of the respective stock options and warrants in the
      computation, principally due to the exercise price of the options and
      warrants being in excess of the market price of the Company's common
      stock.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated February 16, 1996, accompanying the financial
statements and schedules of HWH Corporation included in the Annual Report of The
Coast Distribution System and Subsidiaries (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1995. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Company's Registration Statements on Forms S-8
(File Nos. 33-10769, 33-15322, 33-18696, 33-64582 and 33-86072, effective
December 12, 1986, June 25, 1987, December 1, 1987, June 17, 1993, and November
8, 1994, respectively) and on Form S-3 (File No. 33-33780, effective March 9,
1990).


GRANT THORNTON LLP


/s/Grant Thornton LLP

San Jose, California
March 25, 1996
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2067

To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization demonstration

projects.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 12, 1996

Mr. D’AMATO (for himself, Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. GRAMS, Mr. WELLSTONE,

Mr. SIMON, and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To extend certain Medicare community nursing organization

demonstration projects.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN MEDICARE COMMU4 NITY NURSING ORGANIZATION DEMONSTRA5 TION PROJECTS.

6 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, dem7 onstration projects conducted under section 4079 of the

8 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 may be con9 ducted for an additional period of 3 years, and the dead10 line for any report required relating to the results of such
2

•S 2067 IS

1 projects shall be not later than 6 months after the end

2 of such additional period.

Æ
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1488/2006

of 9 October 2006         

fixing the depreciation coefficients to be applied when agricultural products are bought in, for the 2007 accounting year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 of 2 August 1978 laying down general rules for the financing of interventions by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Section (1), and in particular the second sentence of Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In respect of the products listed in the Annex which, having been bought in by public intervention, have entered store or been taken over by the intervention agencies between 1 October 2006 and 30 September 2007, the intervention agencies shall apply to the values of the products bought in every month the coefficients set out in the Annex.

Article 2

The expenditure amounts, calculated by taking account of the depreciation referred to in Article 1 of this Regulation, shall be notified to the Commission under the declarations established in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2006 (4).

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 October 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2006.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 216, 5.8.1978, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 695/2005 (OJ L 114, 4.5.2005, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 320/2006 (OJ L 58, 28.2.2006, p. 42).

(3)OJ L 171, 23.6.2006, p. 35.

(4)OJ L 171, 23.6.2006, p. 1.

----

ANNEX

Depreciation coefficients to be applied to the monthly buying-in values

----
Exhibit
        31
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I,
        Atsushi Maki, certify that:
 
 1.  
         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Amanasu
        Environment Corporation;
 
 2.  
         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
        of a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
        circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
        respect
        to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
        statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
        present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
        and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
        this
        quarterly report;
 
 4.  
         I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
        procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
        the
        registrant and we have:
 
 a)  
         Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
        ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
        particularly during the period in which this report is being
        prepared;
 
 b)  
         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
        procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
        of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
        by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  
         Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
        over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
        fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
        materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
        and
 
 5.  
         I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s
        auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons
        performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)  
         All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
        operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
        likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
        summarize and report financial data; and
 
 b)  
         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
        over
        financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
                  May 21, 2007/s/
                  Atsushi MakiAtsushi
                  MakiCEO,
                  CFO, CAO
EXHIBIT
32.1 – SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant


to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002














I,
Antonio Treminio, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting
Officer of Atlantic Wine Agencies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            
            the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
      (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
            
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
November 19, 2008


/s/
Antonio Treminio


Antonio
Treminio


Chief
Executive Officer,


Acting
Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2





GLOBAL
DIGITAL SOLUTIONS, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Global Digital
Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.
 The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
 The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





By:
 /s/ Jerome J.
Gomolski


Jerome J. Gomolski


Principal
Accounting Officer


Date: June 18,
2019