alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

March 19, 1996

Mr. Peter Churm
67 Monarch Bay
Dana Point, CA  92629-3459

        Re: Consulting Agreement

Dear Pete:

        This will confirm that:

        1.     Effective February 4, 1996, Furon retained you to provide
               management consulting services for Furon's fiscal year ending
               February 1, 1997. You will be paid $76,800 and will be reimbursed
               for business related expenses incurred in the performance of
               those services. As part of this arrangement, you are entitled to,
               and Furon has purchased, general medical insurance coverage for
               your spouse, as well as medical insurance to supplement Medicare
               coverage maintained by you, at an aggregate cost to Furon of
               approximately $600 per month, and Furon will reimburse you and
               your spouse for any uninsured out-of-pocket medical expenses. It
               is contemplated that the consulting arrangement will require the
               commitment of approximately 50% of your business time.

        2.     In performing your services as a consultant pursuant to that
               arrangement, you have been and will continue to be an independent
               contractor, and not an employee of Furon.

        3.     This consulting arrangement is subject to the annual review and
               approval of Furon's Board of Directors.

        If the foregoing accurately sets forth the terms of your consulting
agreement with Furon, please so indicate by signing the extra-enclosed copy of
this letter at the place provided for your signature and returning it to me.

                                               Cordially,

                                               /s/ J. MICHAEL HAGAN
                                               --------------------------------
                                                   J. Michael Hagan
                                                   Chairman of the Board

APPROVED AND AGREED
EFFECTIVE AS OF FEBRUARY 4, 1996

/s/ PETER CHURM
--------------------------------
    Peter Churm
                                                                    

                                       48
Ex 10.5 Amendment to Voting Agreement


Exhibit 10.5
[Letterhead of Glenn Nussdorf]








January 25, 2012


Perfumania Holdings, Inc.
35 Sawgrass Drive, Suite 2
Bellport, New York 11713
Attn: Michael W. Katz


Re:    Voting Agreement


Dear Mr. Katz:
Reference is made to that certain Voting Agreement (the "Voting Agreement") made and entered into as of December 23, 2011, by and among Perfumania Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Parent"), Glenn Nussdorf ("Mr. Nussdorf") and Ruth Nussdorf ("Ms. Nussdorf").  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Voting Agreement.
The number of shares reported as beneficially owned by Mr. Nussdorf in the Voting Agreement inadvertently "double counted" the shares of Company Common Stock held by Ms. Nussdorf.  The correct number of shares of Company Common Stock that should have been listed on Mr. Nussdorf's signature page to the Voting Agreement is 2,049,013.  
Similarly, Schedule I to the Voting Agreement overstated the number of shares of Company Common Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Nussdorf.  The table in Schedule I as it relates to Mr. Nussdorf should have read as follows:
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned by Glenn Nussdorf with:
	
			
	SOLE VOTING POWER:
	1,799,013
	


	SHARED VOTING POWER:
	250,000
	


	SOLE DISPOSITIVE POWER:
	1,799,013
	


	SHARED DISPOSITIVE POWER:
	250,000
	










In order to correct these inadvertent errors, in accordance with Section 15(c) of the Voting Agreement, please countersign this letter to indicate Perfumania's agreement to amend the Voting Agreement to reflect Mr. Nussdorf's ownership of Company Common Stock as indicated herein.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Glenn Nussdorf 
Glenn Nussdorf




Accepted and Agreed:


Date:  January 25, 2012
PEFUMANIA HOLDINGS, INC.
By:     /s/ Michael W. Katz 
    Name: Michael W. Katz     
    Title: President & CEO
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 153

To reduce Federal spending and enhance military satellite communications

by reducing funds for the MILSTAR II Satellite Program and accelerating plans for deployment of the Advanced EHF Satellite/MILSTAR

III.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 5, 1995

Mr. BUMPERS (for himself, Mr. BRADLEY, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr.

HARKIN, Mr. KOHL, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. SIMON, and Mr.

WELLSTONE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

A BILL

To reduce Federal spending and enhance military satellite

communications by reducing funds for the MILSTAR

II Satellite Program and accelerating plans for deployment of the Advanced EHF Satellite/MILSTAR III.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Satellite Com5 munications Enhancement Act of 1995’’.
2

S 153 IS

1 SEC 2. TERMINATION OF THE MILSTAR II SATELLITE PRO2 GRAM.

3 (a) TERMINATION OF PROGRAM.—The Secretary of

4 Defense shall terminate the MILSTAR II communications

5 satellite development and acquisition program after pro6 curement of a total of two MILSTAR II satellites. No

7 funds appropriated to the Department of Defense may be

8 obligated for development or acquisition of MILSTAR II

9 satellites other than the first two MILSTAR II satellites.

10 (b) ADVANCED EHF SATELLITE PROGRAM.—

11 (1) The Secretary of Defense shall develop a

12 program to accelerate development, acquisition and

13 deployment of the Advanced Extremely High Fre14 quency Communications Satellite/MILSTAR III,

15 small enough to be launched on a medium-launch

16 vehicle.

17 (2) Not later than ninety days after the date of

18 the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit

19 to Congress a report on the program developed

20 under paragraph (1). The report shall describe the

21 proposed scope, pace and cost of acquisition, of a

22 constellation of Advanced EHF satellites.

Æ
#### UNITED STATES of America v. Christopher WILLIAMS, Appellant.

No. 91-3071.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 29, 1994.

*1124G. Godwin Oyewole, Alexandria, VA, filed the brief for appellant after remand.

John R. Fisher and Thomas C. Black, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, DC, filed the brief for appellee after remand. With them on the brief was J. Ramsey Johnson, U.S. Atty., Washington, DC, at the time the brief was filed.

Before: EDWARDS, WILLIAMS, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM:

We retained jurisdiction over this case and remanded the record for findings of fact and conclusions of law. *United States v. Williams,*951 F.2d 1287 (D.C.Cir.1991). The district court had sustained, over defendant’s Fourth Amendment objection, a search that produced incriminating evidence, but the court had failed to “state its essential findings on the record” in compliance with Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. As a result, we were unable to discern what facts the court deemed essential and we could not tell what legal reasoning the court had followed. 951 F.2d at 1289-90. Of the three possible legal grounds supporting the search, only one — based on *Terry v. Ohio,*392 U.S. 1, 27, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1883, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) — encountered no analytical difficulties, but in the district court the government had not defended the search on the basis of *Terry.*Our general rule is that issues neither raised nor decided in the court below cannot be considered on appeal. 951 F.2d at 1290. The government never raised the *Terry*issue. The question remained: did the district court nevertheless decide it, although without saying so? On remand, the district court answered yes. The court’s findings of fact, which are supported by the record, and its conclusions of law, rest on the *Terry*-stop rationale set forth in our opinion, 951 F.2d at 1289-90; that is, articulable suspicion turned into probable cause when one of the officers saw a ziplock bag protruding from defendant’s pocket. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

*Affirmed.*
The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

The Honorable Penny S. Pritzker 

Secretary of Commerce 

U.S. Department of Commerce 

1401 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20230 

Docket No. DOC-2015-0001 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

U.S. Department of State 

2201 C Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Docket No. DOS-2015-0016 

Dear Secretaries Pritzker, Foxx, and Kerry: 

I am writing on behalf of the Block Island Tourism Council asking that you preserve 

airline competition in our skies and encourage, rather than stymie, international 

airline access to America through Open Skies. 

Travel and tourism is a key driver in the U.S. economy, supporting 15 million jobs 

alone in 2014 - and it especially matters for even a smaller destination like Block 

Island and the state of Rhode Island. 

Open Skies agreements directly contributed to the substantial travel growth, 

particularly among international visitors, in Block Island and Rhode Island at-large. 

By fostering greater competition and airline access to markets in India, the Middle 

East, Africa and Southeast Asia, Open Skies enable our destination and businesses to 

welcome visitors from across the world like never before. Travelers, both domestic 

and international, are taking advantage of more affordable options and the 

opportunity to reach and return to U.S. destinations. The result is directly paying 

dividends for local economies like Block Island. 

8oo.383.BIRI 401.466.5200 Fax 401.466.5286 bitourism@yahoo.com 

23 Water Street PO Box 356 Block Island, Rhode Island 02807 

"One of the /,m S!,Yeat places" Till· NATUIZI' CoN~ERVA\iL') 
The United States is built on a fierce competitive foundation. Expand - rather than 

freeze - competition through Open Skies and support the positive economic effects 

that come from expanded airline capacity and competition. 

Sincerely, 

Jessica Willi 

Executive Director, Block Island Tourism Council
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Hiner, President and Chief Executive Officer of Geocom Resources Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Geocom Resources Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  February 22, 2005

/s/ John Hiner	John Hiner
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2044 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2044

 To provide for modification of the State agreement under title II of 
the Social Security Act with the State of Pennsylvania with respect to 
                           certain students.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 1996

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for modification of the State agreement under title II of 
the Social Security Act with the State of Pennsylvania with respect to 
                           certain students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR STUDENTS EMPLOYED BY STATE SCHOOLS, COLLEGES, 
              OR UNIVERSITIES OF PENNSYLVANIA.

    Notwithstanding section 218 of the Social Security Act, the 
agreement with the State of Pennsylvania (or any modification thereof) 
entered into pursuant to such section may, at the option of such State, 
be modified at any time before January 1, 1998, so as to exclude 
service performed in the employ of a school, college, or university if 
such service is performed by a student who is enrolled and is regularly 
attending classes at such school, college, or university.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE OF MODIFICATION.

    Any modification of an agreement pursuant to section 1 shall be 
effective with respect to services performed after the end of the 
calendar quarter following the calendar quarter in which such agreement 
is modified.

SEC. 3. IRREVOCABILITY OF MODIFICATION.

    If any modification of an agreement pursuant to section 1 
terminates coverage with respect to service performed in the employ of 
a school, college, or university, by a student who is enrolled and 
regularly attending classes at such school, college, or university, the 
Commissioner of Social Security and the State may not thereafter modify 
such agreement so as to again make the agreement applicable to such 
service performed in the employ of such school, college, or university.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Renovo Holdings (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen Carnes, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

|   | /s/ Stephen Carnes                                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Stephen Carnes                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |  
 

Chief Executive Officer and Principal

Financial Officer

 

 

May 22, 2006 |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTrac Inc. ("GlobeTrac") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jim Pratt, President, Chief Executive Officer of GlobeTrac and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Jim Pratt
 Jim Pratt  Chief Executive Officer
  August 13, 2003
 
 
  
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTrac Inc. ("GlobeTrac") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John daCosta, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of GlobeTrac, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/John daCosta
 John daCosta  Chief Financial Officer
 August 13, 2003
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1
                                                                     -----------

            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GUANGSHEN RAILWAY COMPANY LIMITED
            ---------------------------------------------------------

     The following table lists information concerning the subsidiaries of
Guangshen Railway Company Limited as of December 31, 2007:

<Table>
<Caption>
---------------------                                                  COUNTRY OF         PERCENTAGE OF INTEREST
        NAME                                                         INCORPORATION       HELD BY GUANGSHEN RAILWAY
                                                                   -----------------   -----------------------------
<S>                                                                <C>                 <C>
DIRECTLY HELD BY THE COMPANY

Guangzhou East Station Dongqun Trade and Commerce Service                 PRC                      100%
 Company
Shenzhen Fu Yuan Enterprise Development Company                           PRC                      100%
Shenzhen Guangshen Railway Travel Service Ltd.                            PRC                      100%
Shenzhen Jing Ming Industrial & Commercial Company Limited                PRC                      100%
Shenzhen Longgang Pinghu Qun Yi Railway Store Loading and                 PRC                       55%
 Unloading Company
Dongguan Changsheng Enterprise Company                                    PRC                       51%
Shenzhen Railway Station Passenger Services Company Limited               PRC                      100%
Guangzhou Tielian Economy Development Company Limited                     PRC                      50.5%

INDIRECTLY HELD BY THE COMPANY(1)

Shenzhen Nantie Construction Supervision Company                          PRC                      100%
Shenzhen Guangshen Railway Economic and Trade Enterprise                  PRC                      100%
 Company
Shenzhen Railway Property Management Company Limited                      PRC                      100%
</Table>

------------

(1)  In 2007, the Company put Shenzhen Road Multi-modal Transportation Company
     Limited and Shenzhen Yuezheng Enterprise Company Limited into liquidation
     and recorded disposal losses of RMB166,000 and RMB897,000, respectively.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference on Registration
Statements Nos. 333-17565, 333-33475, 333-44371, 333-66863, and 333-93747 on
Form S-8 of Renaissance Worldwide, Inc., of our report dated March 12, 1998,
on Neoglyphics Media Corporation as of December 31, 1997 and for the year then
ended, appearing in this Form 10-K.

                                          /s/ Katch, Tyson & Company

                                          Katch, Tyson & Company
                                          Certified Public Accountants

March 24, 2000
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of The Macreport.net, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended May 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, V. William
Lucchetti, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 _
/s/_V. William Lucchetti, Jr.__
 V.
William Lucchetti, Jr.
 Chief
Executive Officer
 July
15, 2005