alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Macreport.net, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month period ended August 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, V. William Lucchetti, Jr., Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/  V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
----------------------------------
     V. William Lucchetti, Jr.
     Chief Executive Officer


August 15, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of First Republic Preferred Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                           |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | /s/ WILLIS H. NEWTON, JR.
|                        |  | Name:                     |  | Willis H. Newton, Jr.                                
|                        |  | Title:                    |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
#### Terry Shane METZENBAUM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF MAYFIELD HEIGHTS, et al. Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-3581.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 31, 2003.

Before DAUGHTREY and COLE, Circuit Judges; and SARGUS, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Edmund A. Sargus, Jr., United States District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

*ORDER*

Terry Shane Metzenbaum appeals pro se from a district court judgment that dismissed his civil action filed under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).

Metzenbaum primarily alleged that he was the subject of an unwarranted police investigation and report regarding the harassment of a waitress at a Longhorn Steakhouse, that he was barred from the restaurant, that the police report was improperly released to his potential employers, and that various prosecutors and state and federal judges were involved in the dismissal of a “continuing criminal enterprise case” that he had filed against the waitress. The district court dismissed the case on April 25, 2002, because Metzen-baum’s allegations did not provide a sufficient basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1). Metzenbaum’s motion for reconsideration was denied, and he now appeals. He has filed several motions for miscellaneous relief.

A *de novo*review of the record indicates that Metzenbaum’s case was properly dismissed because his claims were so insubstantial and attenuated as to deprive the district court of subject matter jurisdiction. *See Apple v. Glenn,*183 F.3d 477, 479-80 (6th Cir.1999). In this regard, we note that Metzenbaum has not alleged all of the material elements that are required to support a RICO claim. *See Begala v. PNC Bank, Ohio, Nat’l Ass’n,*214 F.3d 776, 781-82 (6th Cir.2000); *Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co.,*899 F.2d 485, 494-95 (6th Cir.1990). Metzenbaum argues that he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing. However, a hearing was not required as the existing record plainly shows that he was not entitled to relief.

Metzenbaum now argues that he has a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985. He did not clearly raise such a claim in the district court, and we need not consider it for the first time on appeal. *See Barker v. Shalala,*40 F.3d 789, 793-94 (6th Cir. 1994). Nevertheless, we note that Metzen-baum has not alleged a cognizable claim under § 1985(3), as there is no indication that the defendants’ alleged actions were *355motivated by some constitutionally impermissible class-based animus, such as his race or religion. *See Smith v. Thornburg,*136 F.3d 1070, 1078 (6th Cir.1998).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed and all pending motions are denied as moot. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
OLEM/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Final Site*** April 2016 

LEA AND WEST SECOND STREET Roswell, New Mexico

Chaves County

 Site Location:

The site is centrally located near the intersection of Lea Street and West Second Street in Roswell, New Mexico. 

 Site History:

The Lea and West Second Street site consists of a ground water plume of chlorinated solvents from known and 

unknown sources in Roswell, New Mexico. The sources include two areas of contaminated soil associated with former 

dry cleaning operations, contamination associated with a former in-ground concrete separator tank and a contaminated 

ground water plume. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Soil and ground water is contaminated with tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene and trans1,2-dichloroethene. These contaminants were found at concentrations greater than the Safe Drinking Water Act’s 

Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) within the alluvial ground water. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

More than 48,000 residents of the city of Roswell receive drinking water from ground water. This population is 

potentially affected by the contaminants related to historical industrial site operations. 

 Response Activities (to date):

In 2009 the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) removed an in-ground tank connected to the sanitary 

sewer system from one of the former dry cleaners tenant spaces. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

The NMED referred the site to the EPA due to the chlorinated solvent plume, use of ground water for drinking and the 

presence of geologic conditions favorable for migration. Without identification and investigation of the source of 

ground water contamination and remediation of the contaminated ground water plume additional public and private 

wells may be threatened. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at this time. The 

EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state of New Mexico. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent 

FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to 

these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on 

the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.6

           Summary of the Form of the Railway Construction Management
                   Agreement for the Fourth Line Construction

1. Date of signing: December 15, 2005

2. Names of the Management Agreements, Contracting Parties and Agreed Prices

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                Contracting
No.   Name of Agreement         Party/Parties       Agreed Prices
--    -----------------         -------------       -------------
<S>   <C>                       <C>                 <C>
1     Gaungzhou-Xintang         Project Center of   RMB 7,886,000
      Railway Line Management   Guangzhou Railway
      Agreement                 Group Company

2     Xintang-Pinghu            Project Center of   RMB 9,285,000
      Railway Line Management   Guangzhou Railway
      Agreement                 Group Company
</TABLE>

3. Outline for the Project Management Agreements

     The agreements consist of nine parts, including the name of the project,
the place of the project, the content of the project, the time limit for the
project, investment control, the allocation and settlement of construction fund,
responsibilities and rights of each party, breach responsibility and others.

4. Scope of services provided by the Contracting Party/Parties

     Project Center of Guangzhou Railway Group Company shall be responsible for
the overall management of the railway line between Guangzhou and Xintang and
between Xintang and Pinghu, including the design and co-ordination of project,
the arrangement of expenditure scheme, conducting tendering procedures according
to the provisions of the State and the MOR, quality supervision of project, and
land acquisition, demolition and relocation.

5. Payment terms

     Project management fees shall be settled annually in cash according to the
progress of project construction, and the remaining shall be paid after the
completion of project.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MAXIM GROUP, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                  FEB-01-1997   
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-1998   
<CASH>                               28,880     
<SECURITIES>                              0     
<RECEIVABLES>                        71,437     
<ALLOWANCES>                          2,916     
<INVENTORY>                          54,693     
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    157,548     
<PP&E>                              185,246     
<DEPRECIATION>                       48,039     
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      321,494     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                47,216     
<BONDS>                             129,349     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0     
<PREFERRED>                               0     
<COMMON>                                 17     
<OTHER-SE>                          (14,894)    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        321,494     
<SALES>                             365,127     
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    365,127     
<CGS>                               249,381     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       249,381     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     83,955     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      1,893     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    6,948     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      26,470     
<INCOME-TAX>                         10,314     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  16,156     
<DISCONTINUED>                            0     
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         785     
<CHANGES>                                 0     
<NET-INCOME>                         15,371     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .95<F1> 
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .92     
<FN>
<F1>Tag (EPS-PRIMARY) Denotes Basic EPS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-10636

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS GONZALEZ-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-217-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jesus Gonzalez-Garcia pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal. 

He was sentenced to 30 months of imprisonment to be followed by one year of 

imprisonment. Gonzalez-Garcia has filed an unopposed motion for the 

summary disposition of his appeal.

In his first issue, Gonzalez-Garcia contends that the district court 

violated his constitutional rights under the Confrontation Clause and Due 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 13, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-10636 Document: 00514833432 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/13/2019
No. 18-10636

2

Process Clause when, in imposing his sentence, the court relied on information 

from the presentence report about his other criminal activity. He concedes

that the issue is foreclosed by this court’s decisions in United States v. Beydoun, 

469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir. 2006), and United States v. Navarro, 169 F.3d 228, 

236 (5th Cir. 1999). As Gonzalez-Garcia observes, his rights under the 

Confrontation Clause do not extend to sentencing proceedings. See Beydoun, 

469 F.3d at 108. Moreover, we have previously rejected that the denial of the 

right to confront witnesses at a sentencing hearing was a due process violation. 

See United States v. Salas, 182 F. App’x 282, 284 & n.7 (5th Cir. 2006).

In his second issue, Gonzalez-Garcia argues that his sentence exceeds 

the correct statutory maximum sentence of two years under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) 

because the statutory enhancement scheme in § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. 

He also argues that his guilty plea is involuntary and was accepted in violation 

of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 because he was not admonished that 

the fact of a prior conviction is an essential element of the offense that the 

Government must prove to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Gonzalez-Garcia 

concedes, though, that these issues are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. 

United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998).

Gonzalez-Garcia has raised these foreclosed issues because he seeks to 

preserve them for possible further review. Because summary disposition is 

appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th 

Cir. 1969), the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the 

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-10636 Document: 00514833432 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/13/2019
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2159 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2159

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To set the time for the convening of the One Hundred Fifth Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    The First Session of the One Hundred Fifth Congress shall convene 
at noon on January 7, 1997.

            Passed the Senate September 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2159

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To set the time for the convening of the One Hundred Fifth Congress
```
• ~I ~/ l~ ~ •/<(%f~ (//1(( 

Mary-Ann Baldwin 

Councillor-At-Large 

May 12, 2015 

'I'he I Ionorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of "I'ransportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

'I'he Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street N W 

Washington, DC 20520 

Dear Secretary Foxx and Secretary Kerry, 

I am writing to you today to ask that the U.S. government open consultations with Qatar and the United 

Arab Emirates in order to address the market-distorting subsidies these countries have been providing 

their state-owned airlines. 

I trust you are aware of the more than $39 billion in subsidies that Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways, and 

Emirates Airline have received from their respective governments over the Iast decade. 

These subsidies fly in the face of the Open Skies agreements that are meant to provide a level playing 

field in international travel. They have enabled the Gulf airlines to expand rapidly and add numerous 

new routes while jeopardizing American jobs due to unfair competition. 

T'his level of distortion can have a negative effect on the economy of Raleigh as flightS into and out o£ 

Raleigh-Durham International Airport could be impacted by air traffic diverted from U.S. carriers to Gulf 

carriers. 

I ask that the U.S. government open consultations with Qatar and the UAE to restore the main objective 

of U.S. Open Skies policy: fair, market-based competition. I also ask that new routes by these carriers into 

U.S. markets be halted while negotiations take place. 

Sincerely, 

%~J - At64~ 

Mary-Ann Baldwin, Member-At-Large 

Raleigh City Council 

CC: U.S. Senator Richard Burr 

U.S. Senator Thom TiIlis 

U.S. Representative I.)avid Price 

Telephone: 919.996.3050 

Office - 222 West Hargett Street - Post Office Box 590 - Raleigh, North Carolina 27602-0590 

Recycled Paper
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of microHelix, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tyram H. Pettit,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                                                                                                  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Tyram H. Pettit

Tyram H. Pettit
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
May 14, 2003 |  | 

15
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0184 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM118AD

2000 -92 -005 --- 5/5/10 2000 -92 -006 --- 3/29/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001012466
<NAME> BIGMAR,INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         140,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  927,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,611,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,923,553
<PP&E>                                      20,601,739
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,251,735
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,709,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,988,771
<BONDS>                                      9,487,445
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,027
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,224,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,709,182
<SALES>                                      6,377,822
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,377,822
<CGS>                                        4,812,290
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,812,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,690,053
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,062,271
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,221,702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,221,702)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,221,702)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.46)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of McKenzie Bay International, Ltd. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB/A (Amendment No. 1) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|Dated: July 8, 2003 |  | /s/ Gary L. Westerholm
Gary L. Westerholm
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |                                                                                
|                    |  |                                                                                
|                    |  | /s/ Gregory N. Bakeman
Gregory N. Bakeman
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer