alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JIMMY THOMPSON, )

)

 Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4218

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

 Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 7, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco

County; Mary M. Handsel, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Matthew Overpeck, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow; and Jorge Angulo of 

Angulo Law Office, P.A., Pinellas Park, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, SILBERMAN, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Order 2011

- 12

- 5

Served: December 14, 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 14 th of December, 2011

Essential Air Service at

PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET DOT

- OST

- 20 11

- 013 8

Summary

By this O rder, the Department of Transportation extends the E ssential Air S ervice (EAS)

obligation of Mesaba Aviation and Pinnacle Airlines, d/b/a Delta Connection (Delta), at Pierre,

S outh D akota

, for an additional 30 days, through January 15 , 201 2

.

Background

On Ju ly 15 , 2011, Delta filed a 90

- day notice with the Department of its intent to terminate its

subsidy

- free service at 24 communities, including Pierre, South Dakota, effective October 13,

2011. By Order 2011

- 11

- 4, November 2, 2011, we required Delta to continue to provide EAS at

Pierre. As required by 49 U.S.C. 41734, we are extend ing Delta ’s service obligation for an

initial 30

- day period, through January 15 , 2012.

This O rder is issued under authority assigned in 14 CFR 385.12(k)(5).

ACCORDINGLY,

1. We require Mesaba Aviation and Pinnacle Airlines, operating as Delta Connection, to

maintain its current level of service Pierre , as set forth in Appendix A through January 15

, 201 2;

2. We direct Mesaba and Pinnacle Airlines to retain all books, records, and other source and

summary documentation to support subsidy claims for payment, and to preserve and maintain

such documentation in a manner that readily permits its audit and examination by representatives

of the Department. Such documentation shall be retained for seven years from when subsidized

EAS began or until the Department indicates that the records may be destroyed, whichever

comes first. Copies of flight logs for aircraft sold or disposed of must be retained. The carrier

may forfeit its compensation for any claim that is not supported under the terms of this O rder;- 2

-

3. This Docket will remain open until further order of the Department; and

4. We will serve copies of this O rder on the Mayor and airport manager of Pierre, South Dakota,

Mesaba Aviation, and Pinnacle Airlines

.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this O rder under the Department’s

Aviation Economic Regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, must file such petitions within ten (10) days

after the date of service of this order.

This order will be effective immediately, and the filing of a petition for review shall not preclude

its effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN

Director, Office

of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available at

www.regulations.govEssential Air Service to be Maintained at Pierre, South Dakota

Effective Period : December 20 , 2011, until through January 15, 2012

Scheduled Service : Twelve nonstop round trip per week to Minneapolis

Aircraft : CRJ

, 50 seats
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2050

To provide an enhanced penalty for distribution of controlled substances

to recovering addicts.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 3, 1996

Mr. BIDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide an enhanced penalty for distribution of controlled

substances to recovering addicts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recovering Addict Pro5 tection Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. ENHANCED PENALTY FOR DISTRIBUTION OF CON7 TROLLED SUBSTANCES TO RECOVERING AD8 DICTS.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to its authority under

10 section 994 of title 28, United States Code, the United
2

•S 2050 IS

1 States Sentencing Commission shall promulgate guidelines

2 or amend existing guidelines to provide an appropriate en3 hancement of the punishment for a defendant convicted

4 of violating section 401(a)(1) of the Controlled Substances

5 Act (21 U.S.C. 841(a)(1)) if the defendant distributes,

6 dispenses, or possesses with intent to distribute or dis7 pense, a controlled substance to a person the defendant

8 knows or should know is a recovering narcotics addict.

9 (b) RECOVERING NARCOTICS ADDICT.—For purposes

10 of subsection (a), the term ‘‘recovering narcotics addict’’

11 means any individual who—

12 (1)(A) has previously habitually used any nar13 cotic drug, as defined in section 102 of the Con14 trolled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802(17)), so as to

15 endanger the public morals, health, safety, or wel16 fare; or

17 (B) who has been so far addicted to the use of

18 such narcotic drug as to have lost the power of self19 control with reference to such addiction; and

20 (2) has stopped using such narcotic drug by en21 gaging in treatment as defined in section 2901(d) of

22 title 28, United States Code.

Æ
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Guangshen Railway Company Limited, or the Company, on Form 20-F for the period endingDecember 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, or the Report, the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Date: April 28, 2015 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Guangshen Railway CompanyLimited and will be retained by Guangshen Railway Company Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Guangshen Railway Company Limited, or the Company, on Form 20-F for the period endingDecember 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, or the Report, the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Date: April 28, 2015 

 

/s/ Shen Yi

Shen Yi

General Manager

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Guangshen Railway CompanyLimited and will be retained by Guangshen Railway Company Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Guangshen Railway Company Limited, or the Company, on Form 20-F for the period endingDecember 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, or the Report, the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. 

Date: April 28, 2015 

 

/s/ Tang Xiangdong

Tang Xiangdong

Chief Accountant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Guangshen Railway CompanyLimited and will be retained by Guangshen Railway Company Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 13-5-AD 

~lyou make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. {l 

they do not; click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

General Visual 

Inspection ofthe 7.2 ' \ $0 Left and Right 

\, ., ' 6 ' ' . 

Wing Flaps 

'·'' < ' [IIi ' I (' 0 Jo I ' 

,j t "" < •, (II 

I ' ' 1!1 

'i 'I 

'l (\1)1 ! 

,, I' ' I 

II''' Ill } ' t 

._, II Ill 'I(.,, ' 

II ~H 0 ,y, ,' I 

0 ,1)\l UiO ' ' I 

(I ( 'I ') •)ll •, (, J 

o) 1)(1 ,J,( \ (J :·· 

!) (ii' {> ·,'I '. }t 

I 1,( I 'tl 

() [l( .I • I " 

\o I q th' 

I ,, I' " 

The known number of products in com pi iance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $3,672 

Costs covered under warranty ( il known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

VCK Flap repair or 

replacement 

~. ['0 

\, I '!• I I)' 

.. , ,_ .~:<.' ·. ~ •I n 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): On- Conditon 

Costs are dependent upon the total amount of delamination found and dependent upon total 

number VCK flap assemblies that are replaced. Thererore, no labor or part costs are provided. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ·-

YES* D NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. -

YESO NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? -

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
cffi_Ex_10_15


		
			Exhibit 10.15
		

		
			 
		

		
			SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ ANNUAL COMPENSATION
		

		
			OF
		

		
			C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION
		

		
			 
		

		
			Effective January 1, 2017
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						    

					
					
						    

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Amount

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Annual Retainer Fees 1

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Service as a Director

					
					
						 

					
					
						$

					
					
						10,600 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Service as Chairman of Audit Committee

					
					
						 

					
					
						$

					
					
						6,180 (additional)

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Service as Chairman of Compensation Committee

					
					
						 

					
					
						$

					
					
						5,150 (additional)

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Meeting Fees 2

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Base per day

					
					
						 

					
					
						$

					
					
						600 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Secondary meeting(s) per day

					
					
						 

					
					
						$

					
					
						300 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Equity Compensation

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						In addition to cash compensation, non-employee directors are eligible to receive equity-based 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						awards under the Corporation’s 2013 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan, as determined in the Board’s

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						discretion.

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				



		
			 
		

		


		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 1
			

			
	
			
			The retainer fees are payable in quarterly installments.  




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2
			

			
	
			
			All non-employee directors receive a base meeting fee of $600 per day for Corporation board, C&F Bank board, C&F Bank subsidiary board or committee meeting attendance and a fee of $300 for secondary meeting attendance for each additional Corporation board, C&F Bank board, C&F Bank subsidiary board or committee meeting held on the same day as a meeting for which the base meeting fee is paid. 





		 


		

			1
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 19 (Monday, January 29, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Parts 107 and 121

RIN 3245-AH90


Small Business Investment Company Investment Diversification and 
Growth; Technical Amendments and Clarifications; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Direct final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) is correcting a rule 
that appeared in the Federal Register on January 19, 2024. This 
correction fixes an error in an instruction.

DATES: This correction is effective March 4, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 
    Policy: Bailey G. DeVries, Associate Administrator of the Office of 
Investment and Innovation, Small Business Administration, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8c7c1c186cedac7c6dcc7cecec1cbcde8dbcac986cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a252323642c3825243e252c2c23292f0a39282b642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-941-6064. This phone number can also be 
reached by individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, or who have 
speech disabilities, through the Federal Communications Commission's 
TTY-Based Telecommunications Relay Service teletype service at 711.
    Regulatory Comments/Federal Register Docket: Nathan Putnam, Office 
of Investment and Innovation, Small Business Administration, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9df2f4f4b3fbeff2f3e9f2fbfbf4fef8ddeefffcb3faf2eb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="127d7b7b3c74607d7c667d74747b7177526170733c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>, 202-699-1746. This phone number can also be 
reached by individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, or who have 
speech disabilities, through the Federal Communications Commission's 
TTY-Based Telecommunications Relay Service teletype service at 711.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2024-00559 appearing on page 3542 
in the Federal Register on Friday January 19, 2024, the following 
correction is made:


Sec.  107.150  [Corrected]

0
1. On page 3547, in the second column, in instruction 3, the 
instruction ``Amend Sec.  107.150 by revising paragraph (b)(2) to read 
as follows:'' is corrected to read ``Amend Sec.  107.150 by revising 
paragraph (b)(2) introductory text to read as follows:''.

Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2024-01629 Filed 1-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-50342 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE SALAZAR-GUZMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-715-ALL

-------------------- October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Salazar-Guzman appeals the 41-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Salazar-Guzman contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Salazar-Guzman notes that he pleaded guilty to an indictmentNo. 01-50342 -2- which recited only facts and elements supporting a charge of simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense. Salazar-Guzman acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). SalazarGuzman’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Theodore R. Maloney, certify that:

 

1.  The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) ofMediCor Ltd. (the “Company”), fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of MediCor.

 

Date: May 16, 2005

 
|   | /s/  Theodore R. Maloney |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Theodore  R. Maloney     |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7462

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TIMOTHY MAURICE TYSON, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr - 00371

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : July 22, 2021 Decided: August 11, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, KING , and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
Timothy Maurice Tyson, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Maurice Tyson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). Upon review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See
United States v. Kibb le , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021 ) (stating standard of review ). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order

. United States v. Tyson , No. 1:16

- cr 00371

- TDS

- 1 ( M.D.N.C. Sept. 14 , 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We have issued our report dated August 6, (except for Note J, as to which the
date is September 30, 1996) accompanying the financial statements of Inland
Casino Corporation appearing in the fiscal 1996 Annual Report of the Company to
its shareholders included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended June 30, 1996, which are incorporated by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (1996 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option Plan). We
consent to the incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of the aforementioned report.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Los Angeles, California
January 13, 1997
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   /s/           Gregory M.E. SpierkelName:
    Gregory M.E. SpierkelTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2063 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2063

  To limit the authority of the Secretary of the Army to acquire land 
                 adjacent to Abiquiu Dam in New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 1996

 Mr. Domenici (for himself and Mr. Bingaman) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To limit the authority of the Secretary of the Army to acquire land 
                 adjacent to Abiquiu Dam in New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON LAND ACQUISITION.

    Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to authorize continued 
storage of water at Abiquiu Dam in New Mexico'', approved October 24, 
1988 (43 U.S.C. 620a note), is amended by inserting immediately 
following ``acquire lands'' the following: ``only from willing 
sellers''.
                                 <all>
```