alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
 
 NEWS RELEASE
 CONTACT:
    
    Investor RelationsIrvine Sensors Corporation714-444-8718investorrelations@irvine-sensors.com
 IRVINE
SENSORS RECEIVES NASDAQ STAFF DETERMINATION REGARDING MINIMUM BID
PRICE
    www.irvine-sensors.com




---



##### 



Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
 All statements included in this press release, other than statements or characterizations of
historical fact, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the
Companys current expectations, estimates and projections about the Company, managements beliefs,
and certain assumptions made by the Company, and events beyond the Companys control, all of which
are subject to change. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements
relating the approval of a reverse stock split by the Companys stockholders and the Companys
ability to regain compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements within the time period specified
above. Forward-looking statements can often be identified by words such as anticipates,
expects, intends, plans, predicts, believes, seeks, estimates, may, will,
should, would, could, likely, potential, continue, ongoing, similar expressions, and
variations or negatives of these words. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
future results or the commitments made by the Company herein, and they are subject to risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely
from those
expressed in any forward-looking statement. The risks and uncertainties referred to above include,
but are not limited to, the ability of the Company to file a definitive proxy statement and hold
its Annual Meeting of Stockholders in a timely manner, the possibility that the Companys
stockholders will not approve a reverse stock split, the possibility that the Companys plan for
regaining compliance with Nasdaq listing requirements will not be satisfactory to the Nasdaq Panel
and/or that the Nasdaq Panel will not grant the Companys request, the Companys stock price could
decline further, and such other factors described in the Companys filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The forward-looking statements in this press release speak only as of the
date they are made. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update publicly any
forward-looking statement for any reason.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT In re Guardianship of Dominic Charles ) Anderson, ) ) ) THE LAW OFFICE OF KANNER & ) PINTALUGA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-976 ) DEBORAH WOOD, as guardian of ) Dominic Charles Anderson, ) ) Respondent. ) ) Opinion filed November 6, 2019. Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Kimberly Bonner, Judge. Mahra Sarofsky of Slusher & Rosenblum. P.A., West Palm Beach, for Petitioner. Hank B. Campbell of Tamayo & Aranda, P.A. of Lakeland, for Respondent. PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
**Exhibit32.1**

**WRITTENSTATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. 1350**

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Liquidmetal Technologies,Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, based on my knowledge, that theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September30, 2006, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.
| /s/ Larry Buffington                                     |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Larry Buffington, President and Chief Executive  Officer |
| November 14, 2006                                        |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 178 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 178

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to extend the authorization for the 
     Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 9, 1995

   Mr. Lugar (for himself and Mr. Leahy) (by request) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to extend the authorization for the 
     Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``CFTC Reauthorization Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 12(d) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 16(d)) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are 
necessary to carry out this Act for each of fiscal years 1995 through 
2000.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Virgil Avery WITHERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7569.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 27, 2003.

Decided Feb. 10, 2003.

Virgil Avery Withers, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Virgil Avery Withers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Withers has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Withers,*Nos. CR-00-122-BO; CA-01-987-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 31, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
CITGO Petroleum Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-3226) on Form S-3 of CITGO Petroleum Corporation of our report dated March
3, 2005, except as to Note 17, which is as of March 30, 2005, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of CITGO Petroleum Corporation as of December
31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended which report appears in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K
of CITGO Petroleum Corporation.

                                                  KPMG LLP

Tulsa, Oklahoma
March 30, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 13 (Friday, January 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 3636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00984]



[[Page 3636]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-50-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 45; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Epson Portland, Inc.; (Inkjet Ink Cartridges and Bottles); 
Hillsboro, Oregon

    On September 18, 2023, Epson Portland, Inc. submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within Subzone 45F, in Hillsboro, Oregon.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 65365, September 22, 2023). On 
January 16, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: January 16, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-00984 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1845 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1845

 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require written 
 consent before using union dues and other mandatory employee fees for 
                         political activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 1996

   Mr. Gregg (for himself, Mr. Helms, and Mr. Shelby) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                        Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require written 
 consent before using union dues and other mandatory employee fees for 
                         political activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Union Member Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. WRITTEN CONSENT REQUIRED TO USE UNION DUES AND OTHER MANDATORY 
              EMPLOYEE FEES FOR POLITICAL ACTIVITIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 316(b) of the Federal Election Campaign 
Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 441b(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(8)(A) No dues, fees, or other moneys required as a 
        condition of membership in a labor organization or as a 
        condition of employment shall be collected from an individual 
        for use in activities described in subparagraph (A), (B), or 
        (C) of paragraph (2) unless the individual has given prior 
        written consent for such use.
            ``(B) Any consent granted by an individual under 
        subparagraph (A) shall remain in effect until revoked and may 
        be revoked in writing at any time.
            ``(C) This paragraph shall apply to activities described in 
        paragraph (2)(A) only if the communications involved expressly 
        advocate the election or defeat of any clearly identified 
        candidate for elective public office.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to amounts collected more than 30 days after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the Issuer).

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer, certify that:

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained
by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 4, 2010



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       | 
|       |  | /s/ W. Marston Becker  
|Name:  |  | W. Marston Becker      
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
NUMBER 13-09-00240-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

JOHN MEDELLIN, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 319th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, John Medellin, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for

aggravated assault. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed on April 8, 2009. No motion for new trial was

filed. Notice of appeal was filed on July 21, 2009. On July 31, 2009, the Clerk of this Court
2

notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely perfected. Appellant was

advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was not corrected within ten days

from the date of receipt of the Court’s directive. On August 12, 2009, appellant filed with

this Court a motion for leave to file extension of time to file appeal.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended

in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The

time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline

for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule

10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before May 18, 2009.

Appellant did not file a notice of appeal or motion for extension of time to file his notice of

appeal as permitted by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.3 within the 15-day time

period. See id.

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the

merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App.

1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ

of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the

availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.
3

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240

(Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 31st day of August, 2009.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1680

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to permit

the judicial deportation of criminal aliens.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 17, 1996

Mr. COVERDELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 18 of the United States Code to permit

the judicial deportation of criminal aliens.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. JUDICIAL DEPORTATION.

4 Section 3583 of title 18, United States Code, is

5 amended—

6 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and

7 (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively;

8 (2) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ be9 fore ‘‘The’’;
2

•S 1680 IS

1 (3) by striking the ninth sentence; and

2 (4) by adding at the end the following:

3 ‘‘(2)(A) Notwithstanding any provision of the Immi4 gration and Nationality Act, if an alien defendant is sub5 ject to deportation, the court may order, as a condition

6 of supervised release, that he be deported and remain out7 side the United States, and that he be delivered to a duly

8 authorized immigration official for deportation in accord9 ance with such order.

10 ‘‘(B) While such alien defendant is awaiting deporta11 tion pursuant to such order, the Attorney General shall

12 take such alien into custody and shall not release such

13 alien on bond, parole, or otherwise, unless so permitted

14 by order of the sentencing court.

15 ‘‘(C) During the period such an alien defendant is

16 to remain outside the United States as a condition of su17 pervised release, the Attorney General may not consent

18 to the reentry of such alien.

19 ‘‘(D) Nothing in this section prevents the Attorney

20 General from initiating deportation proceedings against

21 such an alien defendant pursuant to the Immigration and

22 Nationality Act, but such alien defendant may not be re23 leased from custody except pursuant to this section.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011451
<NAME> MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,019
<ALLOWANCES>                                       175
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,663
<PP&E>                                           3,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,460
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              167
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,583
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,602
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,812
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,383
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,039
<INCOME-TAX>                                       968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: February 23, 2007



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/    DAVID T. HUNG,
M.D.           
|Name:  |  | David T. Hung, M.D.                  
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of In Vivo Medical  Diagnostics,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, In Vivo  Medical  Diagnostics,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been provided to In Vivo Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by Lapis
Technologies,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.

February 3, 2005                                     /s/ Bernard Turner
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Bernard Turner
                                                     Chief Financial Officer