alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Ryan Parker [ mailto:rparker@endicott.com ] Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 1:48 PM To: Nizich, Sharon Cc: jlaity@omb.eop.gov ; Nathan_j._frey@omb.eop.gov ; Aaron_L_szabo@omb.eop.gov ; Susan Miller; senator_fischer@fischer.senate.g ov ; ben_sasse@sasse.senate.gov Subject: Brick MACT Supplemental Information; Docket No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0291

Please see attached supplemental letter to September 2, 2015, OMB meeting regarding Docket No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2013

- 0291 Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing MACT.

Ryan L. Parker | President & CEO P.O. Box 17 | Fairbury, NE 68352 PH: 402

- 729

- 3315 FAX: 402

- 729

- 5804

BRICK • THIN BRICK • PAVERS • TILE | endicott.com
This communication, along with any attachments, is covered by federal and state law governing electronic communications and may contain confidential and legally privileged information. If the
re ader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please reply immediately to the sender and delete this message. Thank you.
<< MACT no visible emission requirement.pdf>>
th
 RECITALS
  ®
 ®
 ®
   ARTICLE 2  THE ESCROW




---



##### 



BUYER
    
    JADE CAPITALAMDL, INC., a Delaware corporation
    
    Jade Capital Group Limited, a British
Virgin Islands corporationBy:
    
    
    
    By:Douglas C. MacLellan, President
    
    
    
    Minghui Jia, Managing DirectorAgreed and accepted:
    
    SHAREHOLDERSESCROW HOLDER
    
    PEARL KING GLOBAL LIMITED/s/
    
    By:Louis Taubman, Esquire
    
    
    
    Minghui Jia, DirectorHOMING NOMINEES LIMITEDBy: Benefit Capital Limited
 By:Authorized Officer
 2
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1875 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1875

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States courthouse in Medford, Oregon, as the 
                ``James A. Redden Federal Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 310 West Sixth Street in Medford, 
Oregon, shall be known and designated as the ``James A. Redden Federal 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James A. Redden 
Federal Courthouse''.

            Passed the Senate September 24, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1875

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States courthouse in Medford, Oregon, as the 
                ``James A. Redden Federal Courthouse''.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                               AMENDMENT NO. FOUR
                             POST PROPERTIES, INC.
                              EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN




         Pursuant to the power reserved in section 17 of the Post Properties,
Inc. Employee Stock Plan ("Plan"), the first sentence of Section 7.1, Committee
Action, is hereby amended to read as follows:


         "The Committee acting in its absolute discretion shall
         have the right to grant Options to Key Employees under
         this Plan from time to time to purchase shares of Stock;
         provided, however, that the Committee shall not have the
         right to grant new Options in exchange for the cancellation
         of outstanding Options which have a higher Option Price than
         the new Options and, further, no grants of ISOs shall be
         made to Key Employees who are not employed by Post or a
         Subsidiary, and no Option or Options, individually or
         collectively, shall be granted to any Key Employee in any
         calendar year to purchase more than 50,000 shares of Stock."

         This Amendment to the Plan shall be effective as of the date
that the Board of Directors of Post Properties, Inc. adopted this Amendment to
the Plan.

                           POST PROPERTIES, INC.



                           BY: /s/ Sherry W. Cohen
                              ---------------------------------------
                           TITLE: Senior Vice President and Secretary
                                 ------------------------------------
                           DATE: October 30, 1997
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1



                                   EPS-Calc

Southern Pacific Funding Corporation
Statement Regarding Computation of Net Income per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                   Year ended December 31,
                                                                                                  1997                 1996
                                                                                                  ----                 ----
<S>                                                                                              <C>                  <C>
Diluted net income per share:
Net income...............................................................................        $53,774,896          $27,631,989
Add: Interest on convertible subordinated debentures (net of taxes)......................          2,864,198              510,078
Adjusted net incomes.....................................................................         56,639,094           28,142,067
Weighted average number of shares outstanding............................................         20,747,665           18,552,500
Net effect of dilutive stock options-based on treasury stock method......................          4,610,537            1,959,436
                                                                                         -------------------   ------------------
Total average shares.....................................................................         25,358,202           20,511,936
Diluted net income per share.............................................................        $      2.23          $      1.37
                                                                                         ===================   ==================

Basic net income per share:
Net income...............................................................................        $53,774,896          $27,631,989
Weighted average number of shares outstanding............................................         20,747,665           18,552,500
Basic net income per share...............................................................        $      2.59          $      1.49
                                                                                         ===================   ==================
</TABLE>
1491O-I3-PI DEPARTMENT 

## orTAANSPORTA TlON, 0l00ITl•••••••• "'" 

# '" Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 

# _.- IDocket No. FA.4.-2010--0279~Directo..-ate Identifier 2009-NM-148-AO; Amendme t I 

# 39_l0.'1.~?eD

201o-~'~O 

# 7 .",,,,,,,,

### "~"'" Airwortbiness Directives; Airbus Model A318. AJ 19. AnO, and A321 Series Airpla AGE~CY: Federal Avialion AdminiSifaiion {FAA), Depanment ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: We are adopting <lnew airwort~illcss directive (AD) for the products lis J/ oIJ ("l.-" 0



# 10
." An extended de-bonding. ifnOl delecte~ and corrected, may dcgrade the structural integrity oflhe nJdder. The loss of the rudder leads to degradation ofthe handling qualities aridreduces the controllability of lhe aeroplane. Investigation has determined that thedefccts reported on both nJddcrs corresponded to areas that hadbeen reworked in production. The invcstigation confirmed thai Ihcdefects were a result ofde-bonding belween the skin and honeycomb core. Surface defects were visually detected on the l11dder of one A3l9 and one A32l in-service aeroplane. above. This AD results from mandatory continuing ainvorthiness information (r-.1CAI) A;J 1'4. -II ~
condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identi fyand correct an lInsaf~



## • 

## • • • • • •

FAA Form 1360-'4.1 (5-89) OFFICIAL ALE COPY
<PAGE>



                           32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CEO

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund IV,
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, George S. Springsteen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/  George S. Springsteen
----------------------------
George S. Springsteen
Chief Executive Officer
May 16, 2005
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Neil P. Edwards,Interim Chief Financial Officer of United Online, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)   theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information contained in such reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 9, 2007        |
|-----------------------------------|
| /s/ NEIL P. EDWARDS               |   |
| Neil P. Edwards                   |
| *Interim Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### Diane S. SHERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VERIZON VIRGINIA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-2162.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 18, 2002.

Decided Jan. 21, 2003.

*137Diane S. Sherman, Appellant Pro Se. Betty S.W. Graumlieh, George William Norris, Jr., McSweeney & Crump, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Diane S. Sherman appeals the magistrate judge’s orders1 denying her motion for an opportunity to be heard and her motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3), and denying her leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.2 With regard to Sherman’s Rule 60(b)(3) motion and motion for an opportunity to be heard, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm this portion of the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Sherman v. Verizon Virginia, Inc.,*No. CA-01-526-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 24, 2002).

Sherman also appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying her leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dismiss this portion of the appeal as moot. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 24; *United States v. Boutwell,*896 F.2d 884, 890 (5th Cir.1990). Sherman has filed in this court a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, which contains information that was not presented to the magistrate judge. We grant Sherman’s motion to proceed on appeal in for-ma pauperis.

Finally, we deny Sherman’s motions for appointment of counsel and to correct the record, deny her motion to consolidate with Appeal No. 02-2170, and deny her motion to expedite consideration of this appeal as moot. We deny Verizon Virginia, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.*

1

. This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).

2

. While Sherman’s informal brief filed in this court states that she is appealing from the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Verizon Virginia, Inc., her informal brief was not filed within the appeal period set forth in Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), and, thus, cannot serve as a notice of appeal. *See Smith v. Barry,*502 U.S. 244, 247-49, 112 S.Ct. 678, 116 L.Ed.2d 678 (1992) (holding that document filed within appeal period and containing information required by Fed. R.App. P. 3(c), is functional equivalent of notice of appeal).
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER OF MAX RE CAPITAL LTD.**

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly reporton Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of Max Re Capital Ltd. (the “Issuer”).

I, Robert J. Cooney, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify:

|   | (i)    | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.        |

Dated:  November 13, 2002.

|                              |   | /s/ ROBERT J. COONEY |             |
|-----------------------------------|--------|----------------------|------------------|
|                              |        |                 |
|                              | Name:  |                 | Robert J. Cooney |   |
|  
  
 
  |
#### Thomas N. FEATHERINGILL, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 03-3091.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Jan. 23, 2003.

ORDER

Order Vacated, See 2003 WL 1090228.

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
# ~!\/\

-1C\ l 

# I 113
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

### Organization Person Contacted Date 

### Response Transport Canada Richard Topham 5/1all0 No Objections

613-952-4428
Bombardier Chester Liburski 5/10110 No Objections Aerospace (514) 855-5001 x89036 Region'll Air1in~ Dave Lotterer 5/10110 NoObjections Association 202-367-1252

lotlcrcr@raa.org
. !;;:F);^RTMENT OF 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATiaK^?^^^-^Q{|,^ 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ' ' '"" ^nAi l-^b 

* ' 

* FAA Docket No.CP 1 OSW0006 

In the Matter of: * 

* 

* DMS No. FAA-2010-0532 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. * 

* 

* Hon. Richard C. Goodwin (ALJ) 

* 

?' \S P hyq 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION 

TO COMPLAINANT 

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION 

1. A copy of the relevant pages from C.J. DiCesare's "journal" (as he testified during his Oct. 7, 

2010 deposition) that refer, reflect or relate to meetings, conversations and/or other communications 

concerning the facts alleged by FAA in this case. Item 22-2(b) of American's DC-9 Minimum 

Equipment List (MEL), or American's use (whether proper or improper) of the DC-9 MEL. 

RESPONSE: 

Any documents responsive to this request are enclosed. 

Respectfully submitted, 

LYNETTE WORD 

Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

By:. Ui(Z^ 

Yolanda Ayala Bemal 

Attorney 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Phone: (817)222-5070 

FAX: (817) 222-5945 or 5092 

3 ?^r 

!< I-:T 

1 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on November 2,2010, an original and one copy of 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION 

TO COMPLAINANT was sent by Federal Express Mail to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

I hereby certify that on November 2, 2010, a copy of COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO 

RESPONDENT'S THIRD REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO COMPLAINANT was sent by 

Federal Express Mail to: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

US Department of Transportation, Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Evan P. Singer, 

Jones Day 

2727 North Harwood St. 

Dallas, TX 75201-1515 

^ C. J^^/ifU 

S^i a C. Twa, Paralegal 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

Date: November 2, 2010 
M 
/2-S/'aT 
1 •.:•.! 

r-i 

/' n-of 
S^. 

/ ' ^-o ^ 
/--7',^. 

I - >. 

t 4 

( "k V 
'-^^s/S-og-
NORTHERN SIERRA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Gretchen Bennitt, Executive Director 

D ISTRICT HEADQUARTERS NORTHERN FIELD OFFICE 

200 Litton Drive, Suite 320 257 E. Sierra, Unit E 

Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2509 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2227 

Grass Valley, CA 95945 Portola, CA 96122 

(530) 274-9360 I FAX: (530) 274-7546 (530) 832-0102 / FAX: (530) 832-0101 

Email: office@myairdistrict.com Web Site: www.myairdistrict.com Email: ryan@myairdistrict.com 

July 9, 2014 

Gerardo C. Rios 

Chief, Air Permits Office (Air-3) 

EPA Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

SUBJECT: 40 CFR Part 51 , Appendix S Applicability 

Dear Mr. Rios: 

AIE<CIE~VED 

JUL 1 4 2014 

---------------

This letter is in response to your request for additional information regarding compliance with the 

federal new source review (NSR) requirements for ozone, in the interim, while requirements 

consistent with the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone are incorporated into 

our NSR program. In particular, you have asked us to acknowledge the applicability of 40 Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR) part 51, Appendix S to new and modified major sources during the 

period prior to EPA's approval of a NSR program applicable to our ozone nonattainment area. 

As you are aware, a portion of the Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District is currently 

classified as a moderate nonattainment area under the 1997 ozone NAAQS and as a marginal 

nonattainment area under the 2008 ozone NAAQS. A new NSR program submittal was due to EPA 

by June 13,2013 for the 1997 ozone NAAQS, while an NSR program revision is due by July 20, 

2015 for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Accordingly, we are planning on adopting and submitting an NSR 

Rule and an Emission Statements Rule by July, 2015. 

Until EPA takes a final action to approve our new NSR program, we acknowledge that the applicable 

requirements of 40 CFR part 51 , Appendix S apply to any new major source or major modification 

of a major sollrce, as defined therein, for sources emitting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or 

nitrogen oxides (NOx) as ozone precursors. 

Sincerely, 1 

_J!/Jkiou bn~iih Gretchen Bennitt, Executive Director 

Northern Sierra Air Quality Management District 

SERVING NEVADA, SIERRA AND PLUMAS COUNTIES
|   | (a)    | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Immunovative, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (b)    | information contained in the quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Immunovative, Inc.                                |

| Date: November 26, 2012 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Bruce Harmon        |   |
| Bruce Harmon            |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1803

To provide relief to agricultural producers who granted easements to, or

owned or operated land condemned by, the Secretary of the Army for

flooding losses caused by water retention at the dam site at Lake

Redrock, Iowa, to the extent that the actual losses exceed the estimates

of the Secretary, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 23, 1996

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To provide relief to agricultural producers who granted easements to, or owned or operated land condemned by,

the Secretary of the Army for flooding losses caused

by water retention at the dam site at Lake Redrock,

Iowa, to the extent that the actual losses exceed the

estimates of the Secretary, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1803 IS

1 SECTION 1. RELIEF TO AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS FOR

2 FLOODING LOSS CAUSED BY DAM ON LAKE

3 REDROCK, IOWA.

4 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—To be eligible for assistance under

5 this section, an agricultural producer must—

6 (1)(A) be an owner or operator of land who

7 granted an easement to the Federal Government for

8 flooding losses to the land caused by water retention

9 at the dam site at Lake Redrock, Iowa; or

10 (B) have been an owner or operator of land

11 that was condemned by the Federal Government be12 cause of flooding of the land caused by water reten13 tion at the dam site at Lake Redrock, Iowa; and

14 (2) have incurred losses that exceed the esti15 mates of the Secretary of the Army provided to the

16 producer as part of the granting of the easement or

17 as part of the condemnation.

18 (b) COMPENSATION.—

19 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2),

20 the Secretary of the Army shall compensate an eligi21 ble producer described in subsection (a) for flooding

22 losses to the land of the producer described in sub23 section (a)(2) in an amount determined by the Fed24 eral Crop Insurance Corporation.
3

•S 1803 IS

1 (2) REDUCTION.—The amount of compensation

2 provided to a producer under paragraph (1) shall be

3 reduced by—

4 (A) in the case of land located on a 10-

5 year flood plain, 10 percent of the amount oth6 erwise determined under paragraph (1); and

7 (B) in the case of land located on a 25-

8 year flood plain, 4 percent of the amount other9 wise determined under paragraph (1).

Æ