alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6511

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DANA ROSS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District

Judge. (1:05-cr-00009-jpj-pms-1)

Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 2, 2008

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dana Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Dana Ross appeals the district court’s order denying his

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) motion for reduction of his sentence.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Ross, No. 1:05-cr-00009-jpj-pms-1 (W.D.

Va. filed Mar. 17, 2008; entered Mar. 18, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Harry Chauhan, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB of  Atlantic  Wine
Agencies, Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods  presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for the
registrant and have:

         a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
         material  information   relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
         consolidated  subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
         and  procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  presented  in  this  quarterly  report  my  conclusions  about  the
         effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed,  based on our most recent  evaluation,  to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's  board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls  which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
         record,   process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
         identified  for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
         internal  controls;  and

         b) any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
         other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's
         internal controls; and


6. I have  indicated  in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were
significant  changes  in  internal  controls  or in  other  factors  that  could
significantly  affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation,   including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: February 17, 2004

/s/ Harry Chauhan
----------------------------------------------
Name: Harry Chauhan
Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.  FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2008  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection
with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: May 15, 2008 | /s/GARY S. JACOBGary S. Jacob Chief Executive Officer
|------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1608

To extend the applicability of certain regulatory authority under the Indian

Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 12, 1996

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To extend the applicability of certain regulatory authority

under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN

4 REGULATORY AUTHORITY.

5 Section 107(a)(2)(B) of the Indian Self-Determina6 tion and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C.

7 450k(a)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘18 months’’ and

8 inserting ‘‘20 months’’.

Æ
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000012729-JUN-201211:32 AM
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of Cal-Bay International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
J.  Thompson,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




                              By: /s/ Robert  J.  Thompson
                              ----------------------------
                              Robert  J.  Thompson
                              Chief  Executive  Officer

Date:  May 13, 2004
#### Montrell Antonio ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7388.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 12, 2003.

Montrell Antonio Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Montrell Antonio Robinson, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Robinson has not made the requisite showing. *See Robinson v. Angelone,*No. CA-01-1859-AM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 12, 2002; entered Aug. 13, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability *686and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1531 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1531

  To reimburse States and their political subdivisions for emergency 
medical assistance provided to illegal aliens under their custody as a 
                       result of Federal action.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 26, 1996

  Mr. McCain introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reimburse States and their political subdivisions for emergency 
medical assistance provided to illegal aliens under their custody as a 
                       result of Federal action.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF STATES AND LOCALITIES.

    The Attorney General shall fully reimburse the States and political 
subdivisions of the States for costs incurred by the States and 
political subdivisions for emergency ambulance service provided to any 
alien who--
            (1) entered the United States without inspection or at any 
        time or place other than as designated by the Attorney General;
            (2) is under the custody of a State or a political 
        subdivision of a State as a result of transfer or other action 
        by Federal authorities; and
            (3) is being treated for an injury suffered while crossing 
        the international border between the United States and Mexico 
        or between the United States and Canada.

SEC. 2. STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act requires that the alien be arrested by Federal 
authorities before entering into the custody of the State or political 
subdivision.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Attorney General such sums as may be necessary to 
carry out the provisions of this Act.
    (b) Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this Act may be construed 
to prevent the Attorney General from seeking reimbursement from any 
alien described in section 1 for the costs of the emergency medical 
services provided to the alien.
                                 <all>
```
Petition Dismissed, Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum Opinion filed June 

4, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-15-00295-CV

KHYATI UNDAVIA, MINU RX LTD, AND MINU GP, LLC, Appellants

V.

AVANT MEDICAL GROUP, P.A. D/B/A INTERVENTIONAL SPINE

ASSOCIATES AND BRETT L. GARNER D/B/A ALLIED MEDICAL

CENTERS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-22186

MEM ORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Khyati Undavia, Minu RX, Ltd., and MINU GP, LLC bring this 

permissive interlocutory appeal of the March 20, 2015 partial denial of their 

motion for summary judge in favor appellees Avant Medical Group, P.A. d/b/a 

Interventional Spine Associates and Brett L. Garner d/b/a Allied Medical Centers. 
2

See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(d) (West 2015).

On March 20, 2015, the trial court signed the order granting appellants’

motion for permission to appeal the order partially denying their motion for 

summary judgment. Relators filed their petition for permission to appeal the 

March 20, 2015 order in this court. Subsequently, on April 24, 2015, the trial court 

signed an amended order, superseding the March 20, 2015 order. The April 24, 

2015 order renders the petition for permission to appeal and this appeal moot. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition and the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1810

To expand the boundary of the Snoqualmie National Forest, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 23, 1996

Mr. GORTON (for himself and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundary of the Snoqualmie National Forest,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Snoqualmie National

5 Forest Boundary Adjustment Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 The Congress finds the following:

8 (1) Certain private lands in the State of Wash9 ington presently owned by Weyerhaeuser Company

10 and others are located adjacent to the Snoqualmie
2

S 1810 IS

1 National Forest and are logical extensions of the

2 forest.

3 (2) A boundary adjustment will facilitate a land

4 exchange which involves approximately 7,200 acres

5 of National Forest land and 33,000 acres of private

6 land owned by Weyerhaeuser Company, of which

7 6,278 acres are outside the present Snoqualmie Na8 tional Forest boundary.

9 (3) Weyerhaeuser Company and the Forest

10 Service are prepared to exchange these lands, which

11 will benefit both the United States and

12 Weyerhaeuser by consolidating their respective land13 ownership holdings and providing reduced costs for

14 each party to implement their land management ob15 jectives, providing an opportunity to implement more

16 effective ecosystem based management, providing in17 creased recreation opportunities for the American

18 public, providing enhanced fish and wildlife habitat

19 protection, and supporting the ‘‘Mountains-to-the20 Sound’’ goal of a continuous greenway between the

21 Cascade Mountains and Puget Sound.

22 SEC. 3. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

23 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Agriculture is

24 hereby directed to modify the boundary of the Snoqualmie

25 National Forest to include and encompass 10,589.47
3

S 1810 IS

1 acres, more or less, as generally depicted on a map entitled

2 ‘‘Snoqualmie National Forest Proposed 1996 Boundary

3 Modification’’ dated lllllll 1996. Such map,

4 together with a legal description of all lands included in

5 the boundary adjustment, shall be on file and available

6 for public inspection in the Office of the Chief of the For7 est Service in Washington, District of Columbia.

8 (b) RULE FOR LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION

9 FUND.—For the purposes of section 7 of the Land and

10 Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l–

11 9), the boundary of the Snoqualmie National Forest, as

12 modified pursuant to subsection (a), shall be considered

13 to be the boundary of that National Forest as of January

14 1, 1965.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1479 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1479

  To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 
     improve control of acid mine drainage, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 14, 1995

 Mr. Sarbanes (for himself and Ms. Mikulski) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 to 
     improve control of acid mine drainage, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Acid Mine Drainage Abatement Act of 
1995''.

SEC. 2. ACID MINE DRAINAGE.

    Section 402(g) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 
1977 (30 U.S.C. 1232(g)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6)--
                    (A) by striking ``either'' and all that follows 
                through ``trust fund'' and inserting ``a special trust 
                fund''; and
                    (B) by striking ``1995,'' and all that follows 
                through the end of the paragraph and inserting 
                ``1995.''; and
            (2) by striking paragraph (7) and inserting the following:
    ``(7)(A) Any State may receive and retain, without regard to the 3-
year limitation referred to in paragraph (1)(D), amounts up to the 
greater of $1,000,000 or 30 percent of the total of the grants made 
annually to the State under this subsection if the amounts are 
deposited in an acid mine drainage abatement and treatment fund 
established under State law under which the amounts (together with all 
interest earned on the amounts) are expended by the State to undertake 
acid mine drainage abatement and treatment projects.
    ``(B) A project that is funded out of an acid mine drainage 
abatement and treatment fund under subparagraph (A) shall provide for 
the abatement of the causes of the treatment of the effects of acid 
mine drainage from lands and waters that are eligible under section 
404.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1710 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1710

 To authorize multiyear contracting for the C-17 aircraft program, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 25, 1996

 Mr. Thurmond introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize multiyear contracting for the C-17 aircraft program, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING AUTHORITY FOR THE C-17 AIRCRAFT 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Multiyear Contracts Authorized.--The Secretary of the Air Force 
may, pursuant to section 2306b of title 10, United States Code (except 
as provided in subsection (b)(1)), enter into one or more multiyear 
contracts for the procurement of not more than a total of 80 C-17 
aircraft.
    (b) Contract Period.--(1) Notwithstanding section 2306b(k) of title 
10, United States Code, the period covered by a contract entered into 
on a multiyear basis under the authority of subsection (a) may exceed 
five years, but may not exceed seven years.
    (2) Paragraph (1) shall not be construed as prohibiting the 
Secretary of the Air Force from entering into a multiyear contract for 
a period of less than seven years. In determining to do so, the 
Secretary shall consider whether--
            (A) sufficient funding is provided for in the future-years 
        defense program for procurement, within the shorter period, of 
        the total number of aircraft to be procured (within the number 
        set forth in subsection (a)); and
            (B) the contractor is capable of delivering that total 
        number of aircraft within the shorter period.
    (c) Option To Convert to One-Year Procurements.--Each multiyear 
contract for the procurement of C-17 aircraft authorized by subsection 
(a) shall include a clause that permits the Secretary of the Air 
Force--
            (1) to terminate the contract as of September 30, 1998, 
        without a modification in the price of each aircraft and 
        without incurring any obligation to pay the contractor 
        termination costs; and
            (2) to then enter into follow-on one-year contracts with 
        the contractor for the procurement of C-17 aircraft (within the 
        total number of aircraft authorized under subsection (a)) at a 
        negotiated price that is not to exceed the price that is 
        negotiated before September 30, 1998, for the annual production 
        contract for the C-17 aircraft in lot VIII and subsequent lots.
                                 <all>
```
VI

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1566

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel MARSH GRASS TOO.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 7, 1996

Mr. HOLLINGS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

MARSH GRASS TOO.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the
2

S 1566 IS

1 coastwise trade for the vessel MARSH GRASS TOO, hull

2 identification number AUKEV 51139K690.

Æ