alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1655 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1655

  To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide, with respect to 
 research on breast cancer, for the increased involvement of advocates 
          in decisionmaking at the National Cancer Institute.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 29, 1996

 Ms. Snowe (for herself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide, with respect to 
 research on breast cancer, for the increased involvement of advocates 
          in decisionmaking at the National Cancer Institute.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Involvement in Breast 
Cancer Research Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED INVOLVEMENT OF ADVOCATES IN DECISIONMAKING REGARDING 
              RESEARCH ON BREAST CANCER.

    Section 417(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 285a-
6(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following paragraph:
            ``(3) Involvement of advocates in decisionmaking.--
                    ``(A) The Director of the Institute shall, to the 
                extent practicable, provide for the increased 
                involvement (relative to fiscal year 1996) of advocates 
                in decisionmaking at the Institute regarding research 
                on breast cancer.
                    ``(B) For purposes of this paragraph, the term 
                `advocate' means an individual who is accountable to, 
                represents, and reports back to organizations that 
                represent those affected by breast cancer.
                    ``(C) The Director of the Institute shall prepare a 
                report on the manner in which subparagraph (A) has been 
                carried out. The report shall be included in the first 
                report under section 407 that the Director submits 
                after the expiration of the one-year period beginning 
                on the date of the enactment of the Consumer 
                Involvement in Breast Cancer Research Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Kimberly M. DAVIS, Appellant, v. Donetta M. D'INNOCENZO; John R. McCarty; Gary E. Crowell; Donald E. Gibas; Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of the General Services; Steven Garner; Gregory Green.

No. 02-1631.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) Jan. 10, 2003.

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

Before SCIRICA, BARRY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

BARRY, Circuit Judge.

Because we write primarily for the parties, who are familiar with the factual underpinnings of this case, we note simply that appellant Kimberly M. Davis filed a complaint on August 9, 1999 against her employer, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of General Services (“DGS”), and several individual supervisors, alleging discrimination on the basis of race. Appellant raised her non-selection for a position in the Department, as well as various disciplinary suspensions she says she received on the basis of her race and one or more suspensions in retaliation for her having engaged in protected activities.

*93The District Court had jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, *et seq.,*and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1381, 1343, and 1367. Appellate jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We will affirm the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants substantially for the reasons set forth in the lengthy and comprehensive opinion of the District Court. We agree with the District Court that, among other reasons, appellant’s allegations are too conclusory and generalized to engender a material issue of fact as to whether or not discriminatory animus and not legitimate rationales un-dergirded defendant’s employment decisions.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
                 FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Chief Executive Officer of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 27, 2004

                                                      /s/ Gary S. Jacob
                                                      -----------------
                                                      Gary S. Jacob
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1757

AN ACT

To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill

of Rights Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Developmental Disabil5 ities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of

6 1996’’.
2

S 1757 ES

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

2 Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assist3 ance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended

4 by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting

5 ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

6 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

7 PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL

8 RIGHTS.

9 Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assist10 ance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended

11 by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting

12 ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

13 SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

14 UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.

15 Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities As16 sistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is

17 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and

18 inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

19 SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

20 PROJECTS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

21 Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities As22 sistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is
3

S 1757 ES

1 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

Passed the Senate July 12, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1757

AN ACT

To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistand for other purposes. ance and Bill of Rights Act to extend the Act,
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1609]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                          PERSONAL EXPLANATION

                                 ______
                                 

                            HON. JIM GERLACH

                            of pennsylvania

                    in the house of representatives

                       Friday, September 21, 2012

  Mr. GERLACH. Mr. Speaker, on September 14, 2012, I unfortunately 
missed one recorded vote on the House floor. Had I been present, I 
would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall 582.

                          ____________________
```
Home | Search | Site Map | Contact Us

Publications

SWFSC 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive La Jolla, CA 92037-1508 ph: (858) 546-7000 fx: (858) 546-7003 

## SWFSC Fisheries Ecology Publication Search
To obtain copies of publications, please contact the SWFSC Santa Cruz Librarian 

### Search the Index Catalog Lab Contribution #

Keyword(Title, Journal Name or Author)

with all of the words with at least one of the words with the exact phrase

Publication Year (hold down SHIFT or CTRL key for multiple selection) (e.g. 1995, 2002-2005)

Sort by Publication Year Author Search

Last modified: 3/7/2011 11:50:46 AM Home | Site Map | Glossary | FAQs | Links | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Fisheries Ecology Division Publications Search Fisheries Ecology Division Publications
Search SWFSC Technical Memorandums ABOUT US DIVISIONS RESEARCH SPECIES PUBLICATIONS DATA PORTAL EDUCATION MULTIMEDIA GALLERY 

### Page 1 of 1 SWFSC

- Fisheries Ecology Division Publications Search

3/7/2011 http://swfsc.noaa.gov//publications/fedbin/qrypublications.asp?ParentMenuId=54
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 40641 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

VANESSA HERNANDEZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:16

- CR

- 956

- 1

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Vanessa Hernandez

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez h a s not filed a response . We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
March 7, 2018
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-40641 Document: 00514376874 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2018No. 17

- 40641

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 17-40641 Document: 00514376874 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2018
# ./ 

# 2015-136
TO: ATTN: 

## Rulemaking Cover Sheet Secretary of State Administrative Procedure Officer, 101 SHS, Augusta ME 04333 1. Agency: Department ofEnvironmental Protection 2. Agency umbrella and unit number: 06-096 3. Title of rule: Conformity of General Federal Actions 4. Chapter number assigned to the rule: 141 ACCEPTED FOR FILING 

## JUL 

# 2 2 2015 SECRETARY OF STATE
5. Dates/methods of notice: May 20, 2015 in the Kennebec Journal, Portland Press Herald, Bangor Daily News, Lewiston Sun Journal and Waterville Morning Sentinel. 6. Date/place of bearing: None, 30-day comment with opportunity for hearing if requested. 7. Type: 0 new rule 0 partial amendment(s) ofexisting rule suspension ofexisting rule X repeal ofrule emergency rule [1 repeal and replace (complete replacement of existing chapter, with former version simultaneously repealed) 8. Name and phone of agency contact person: Tom Graham 207-287-7598 9. If a major substantive rule under Title 5, c. 375, sub-CII-A, check one of the following 0 provisional adoption (prior to Legislative review) D final adoption D emergency adoption of major substantive rule 10. Certification Statement: I, Patricia W. Aho, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy ofthe rule described above and lawfully adopted by the Department ofEnvironmental Protection on July 13 , 2015. I further ce · that all portions ofthis rule are adopted in compliance with the requirements e M · e Administrat · e Pro ed e Act. Printed name & title: Patricia W. Aho, Commissioner 

### 11.



## ~(~dIS' 0 

## w >



# ~ 

# m

Approved as to form and legality by the Attorney General on Signature


# ~G-£ **Ol!E~IEO\l~~** > (origi nal s ignature, personally signed by an Assistant Attorney General) 

# lR 

# I JUL 2 2 ; 15 ..

**~LJ** \),

**~l'J.** 

## Af\G- Printed Name: l r OFFI C

E O F THE SE CRET*_Y OF ST ATE 1\UuU;> 11\ , IV!f\I' 'IE
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1554 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1554

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the exemption 
 for houseparents from the minimum wage and maximum hours requirements 
                  of that Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 1, 1996

  Mr. Cochran introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to clarify the exemption 
 for houseparents from the minimum wage and maximum hours requirements 
                  of that Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REFERENCE.

    Whenever in this Act an amendment is expressed in terms of an 
amendment to a section or other provision, the reference shall be 
considered made to a section or other provision of the Fair Labor 
Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.).

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF HOUSEPARENT.

    Section 3 (29 U.S.C. 203) is amended by adding at the end thereof 
the following:
    ``(y) `Houseparent' means any person employed by a nonprofit 
institution as a child-care worker, either as a member of a married 
couple or as a single person (1) to serve as a substitute parent for 
children who do not live with their own families, and (2) to reside in 
a family like setting with such children.''.

SEC. 3. MINIMUM WAGE AND MAXIMUM HOURS EXEMPTION FOR HOUSEPARENTS.

    Section 13(a) (29 U.S.C. 213(a)) is amended by striking the period 
at the end of paragraph (16) and inserting ``; or'' and by adding at 
the end thereof the following:
            ``(17) any employee who is employed by a nonprofit 
        institution to serve as a houseparent for abused, neglected, 
        delinquent, orphaned, homeless, or emotionally impaired 
        children, when--
                    ``(A) such children's primary residence is in the 
                residential facilities of such institution,
                    ``(B) such houseparent resides with such children 
                in the residential facilities of such institution for 
                at least 72 hours a week, and
                    ``(C) such houseparent receives, without cost, 
                board and lodging from such institution and is 
                compensated, on a cash basis, at an annual rate of not 
                less than $8,000.''.

SEC. 4. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.

    Subsection (b) of section 13 (29 U.S.C. 213) is amended by striking 
out paragraph (24).
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 12 COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollar Amounts in Thousands)
(Unaudited) Three Months EndedMarch 31,
    
    
    Year Ended December 31,2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Interest Expense
    
    $
    17,800
    
    
    $
    17,100
    
    
    $
    68,100
    
    
    $
    74,100
    
    
    $
    74,500
    
    
    $
    84,700
    
    
    $
    100,300Capitalized Interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,462
    
    
    
    3,946Estimated Interest Portion of
Rent Expense
    
    
    2,318
    
    
    
    2,831
    
    
    
    11,666
    
    
    
    12,183
    
    
    
    14,679
    
    
    
    13,369
    
    
    
    15,614Fixed Charges
    
    $
    20,118
    
    
    $
    19,931
    
    
    $
    79,766
    
    
    $
    86,283
    
    
    $
    89,179
    
    
    $
    99,531
    
    
    $
    119,860Income From Continuing Operations
Before Income Taxes
    
    $
    111,900
    
    
    $
    97,100
    
    
    $
    428,500
    
    
    $
    346,500
    
    
    $
    280,200
    
    
    $
    316,400
    
    
    $
    549,900Add: Fixed Charges
    
    
    20,118
    
    
    
    19,931
    
    
    
    79,766
    
    
    
    86,283
    
    
    
    89,179
    
    
    
    98,069
    
    
    
    115,914Less: Equity in (Earnings)
Losses of Less Than 50% Owned
Companies
    
    
    (189
    )
    
    
    (688
    )
    
    
    (2,903
    )
    
    
    (2,534
    )
    
    
    (2,969
    )
    
    
    (2,922
    )
    
    
    (3,367
    )Earnings Before Fixed Charges
    
    $
    131,829
    
    
    $
    116,343
    
    
    $
    505,363
    
    
    $
    430,249
    
    
    $
    366,410
    
    
    $
    411,547
    
    
    $
    662,447Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    6.6x
    
    
    
    5.8x
    
    
    
    6.3x
    
    
    
    5.0x
    
    
    
    4.1x
    
    
    
    4.1x
    
    
    
    5.5x
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.9

                                    AMENDMENT
                             POST PROPERTIES, INC.
                              EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN

        Pursuant to the power reserved in sec. 17 of the Post Properties, Inc.

Employee Plan, sec. 15, Adjustment, is hereby amended to delete the second

sentence in sec. 15 as currently in effect and to substitute the following for

such sentence:

        "Furthermore, the Board as part of any corporate transaction described
        in sec. 424(a) of the Code shall have the right to adjust (in any manner
        which the Board in its discretion deems consistent with sec. 424(a) of
        the Code) the number, kind or class (or any combination thereof)of
        shares of Stock reserved under sec. 3 of this Plan, and the Committee as
        part of any such transaction shall have the right to adjust (in any
        manner which the Committee in its discretion deems consistent with sec.
        424(a) of the Code) the number, kind or class (or any combination
        thereof) of shares of Stock underlying any Restricted Stock grants
        previously made under this Plan and any related grant conditions and
        forfeiture conditions, and the number, kind or class (or any combination
        thereof) of shares subject to Option grants previously made under this
        Plan and the related Option Price and, further, shall have the right to
        make (in any manner which the Committee in its discretion deems
        consistent with sec. 424(a) of the Code) Restricted Stock and Option
        grants to effect the assumption of, or the substitution for, restricted
        stock or option grants previously made by any other corporation to the
        extent that such corporate transaction calls for such substitution or
        assumption of such restricted stock or option grants."

        This Amendment to the Post Properties, Inc. Employee Stock Plan shall

be effective as of the date that the Board of Directors of Post Properties,

Inc. adopted this Amendment to the Plan.

                                                 POST PROPERTIES, INC.

                                                 BY:  /s/ Sherry W. Cohen
                                                     --------------------------

                                                 TITLE: Sr. V.P. & Sec.
                                                       ------------------------

                                                 DATE:  October 14, 1997
                                                      -------------------------
David Greear

dba Silver Image Studio

P.O. Box 252

Helen, GA 30545

To whom it may concern, 

I have been a professional photographer for over 30 years. I am requesting an exemption to rule 

14 CFR § 11.81.

Providing aerial photography has been a part of my business since it’s beginning. The terrain in 

our region is very mountainous and utilizing piloted aircraft is very hazardous. 

Due to the mountainous terrain, photographing real estate from the ground is difficult and often 

inadequate. Having the ability to use a camera equipped, unmanned, remotely controlled 

quadcopter is a much safer alternative to piloted aircraft for the public at large. 

I will never have the need to fly over 400 feet in altitude and never will operate the aircraft out of 

sight. 

I have lived in the same location for over 30 years and I am very involved with my community. I 

have served on government commissions and boards. I am a responsible adult. I have built a 

good reputation for being a conscientious professional.

Respectfully submitted,

David Greear