alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-1102 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-062-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
##### 



Exhibit 12
 COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Three Months EndedMarch 31,
    
    
    Year Ended December 31,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001Interest Expense
    
    $
    12,100
    
    
    $
    17,800
    
    
    $
    64,800
    
    
    $
    68,100
    
    
    $
    74,100
    
    
    $
    74,500
    
    
    $
    84,700Capitalized Interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,462Estimated Interest Portion of
Rent Expense
    
    
    2,346
    
    
    
    2,318
    
    
    
    10,583
    
    
    
    11,666
    
    
    
    12,183
    
    
    
    14,679
    
    
    
    13,369Fixed Charges
    
    $
    14,446
    
    
    $
    20,118
    
    
    $
    75,383
    
    
    $
    79,766
    
    
    $
    86,283
    
    
    $
    89,179
    
    
    $
    99,531Income From Continuing Operations
Before Income Taxes
    
    $
    144,500
    
    
    $
    111,900
    
    
    $
    495,000
    
    
    $
    428,500
    
    
    $
    346,500
    
    
    $
    280,200
    
    
    $
    316,400Add: Fixed Charges
    
    
    14,446
    
    
    
    20,118
    
    
    
    75,383
    
    
    
    79,766
    
    
    
    86,283
    
    
    
    89,179
    
    
    
    98,069Less: Equity in Earnings of Less
Than 50% Owned Companies
    
    
    (577
    )
    
    
    (189
    )
    
    
    (1,328
    )
    
    
    (2,903
    )
    
    
    (2,534
    )
    
    
    (2,969
    )
    
    
    (2,922
    )Earnings Before Fixed Charges
    
    $
    158,369
    
    
    $
    131,829
    
    
    $
    569,055
    
    
    $
    505,363
    
    
    $
    430,249
    
    
    $
    366,410
    
    
    $
    411,547Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    11.0
    x
    
    
    6.6
    x
    
    
    7.5
    x
    
    
    6.3
    x
    
    
    5.0
    x
    
    
    4.1
    x
    
    
    4.1
    x
**Exhibit4.46**

 

 

[AirNetSystems, Inc. Letterhead]

 

 

 

 

 

 

March31, 2005

 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Re:                               AirNet Systems,Inc. — Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December31, 2004

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

AirNet Systems, Inc., anOhio corporation (“AirNet”), is today filing its Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Form 10-K”).

Pursuant to the provisionsof Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, AirNet hereby agrees tofurnish to the Commission, upon request, copies of those instruments andagreements defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of AirNet and ofholders of long-term debt of AirNet’s consolidated subsidiaries, which are notbeing filed as exhibits to the Form 10-K.  Such long-termdebt does not exceed 10% of the total assets of AirNet and it subsidiaries on aconsolidated basis.

Very truly yours,
| AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC.                             |
|--------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |
| /s/ Gary W. Qualmann                             |   |
|                                             |
| Gary W. Qualmann                                 |
|                                             |
| Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 5251]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Frederick 
National Laboratory Advisory Committee to the National Cancer 
Institute, February 29, 2024, 1:00 p.m. to February 29, 2024, 4:00 
p.m., National Cancer Institute--Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center 
Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 which was published in the Federal Register 
on November 7, 2023, FR Doc 2023-24584, 88 FR 76837.
    This meeting notice is being amended to change the meeting date 
from February 29, 2024 to March 11, 2024. The meeting format, agenda 
and time will stay the same. The meeting can be accessed from the NIH 
Videocast at the following link: https://videocast.nih.gov/. The 
meeting is open to the public.

    Dated: January 23, 2024.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-01594 Filed 1-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### A. DOE, a minor, by B. DOE, her next friend; C. Doe, a minor, by D. Doe, her next friend; E. Doe; I. Doe, a minor, by J. Doe, her next friend; K. Doe; M. Doe, a minor, by N. Doe, her next friend; O. Doe; P. Doe; Q. Doe; R. Doe; S. Doe; T. Doe; W. Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. B.P.S. GUARD SERVICES, doing business as Wells Fargo Guard Services, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. A. DOE, a minor, by B. DOE, her next friend; C. Doe, a minor, by D. Doe, her next friend; E. Doe; I. Doe, a minor, by J. Doe, her next friend; K. Doe; M. Doe, a minor, by N. Doe, her next friend; O. Doe; P. Doe; Q. Doe; R. Doe; S. Doe; T. Doe; W. Doe, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. B.P.S. GUARD SERVICES, doing business as Wells Fargo Guard Services, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 93-1043, 93-1047.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 15, 1993.

Decided Sept. 27, 1993.

Rehearing Denied Oct. 29, 1993.

Kim Roger Luther, St. Louis, MO, argued (Katherine L. Butler on the brief), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Gordon L. Ankney, St. Louis, MO, argued (Edward A. Cohen and David F. Szewczyk on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before MAGILL, Circuit Judge, LAY, Senior Circuit Judge, and HANSEN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is a second appeal following our earlier remand to the district court, *see Doe v. B.P.S. Guard Services, Inc.,*945 F.2d 1422, 1428 (8th Cir.1991), to review the award of punitive damages in light of a recent Supreme Court decision relating to the constitutionality of a state procedure-in awarding punitive damages. *See Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip,*499 U.S. 1, 111 S.Ct. 1032, 113 L.Ed.2d 1 (1991); *see also TXO Prod. Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.,*— U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 2711, 125 L.Ed.2d 366. (1993). This court’s remand was based upon the constitutional guidelines relating to punitive damages as set forth in the *Haslip*case. *See Haslip,*499 U.S. at 17-21, 111 S.Ct. at 1043-45. On remand, the district court granted remittitur of the punitive damages award to $10,000 for each plaintiff based upon the court’s analysis that the reduced award more reasonably reflected a relationship between the actual injury and the punitive damage award. Although the district court did not specifically discuss the constitutionality of the Missouri procedure, we find that the analysis made by the district court, and as now reviewed by this court, meets the constitutional standards set forth in *Haslip*and *TXO.*

The judgment of the district court is hereby affirmed.
Interagency comments on 2060-AP52 -- RIA Chapters 8 & 2 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: RobertJ Wayland 

 03/15/2011 12:32 PM 

 Cc: Bill Maxwell, Larry Sorrels, Karen Thundiyil, Charlotte Bertrand 

 

2 Attachments 

Chapter 8ToxicsRuleRIA3-

11OMBreviewclean_InteragencycommentsunderEO12866_03152011.docx 

Chapter2IntroductionToxicsRuleRIA3-

14OMBreviewclean_InteragencycommentsunderEO12866_03152011.docx 

Hi Bob,

Please find attached interagency comments on Chapters 8 & 2 of the RIA.   Please let me know if you

have any questions.

Regards,

Cortney

________________________________________________

Cortney Higgins, PhD 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
October 29, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Steven S. BossSteven S. BossChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



Exhibit
10-r-5
  
  Re:
    
    Credit and Security Agreement (the Credit Agreement) dated as of November 29,
2005, by and between Conexant USA, LLC (Purchaser), and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Lender (capitalized terms used herein have the meanings ascribed
thereto in the Credit Agreement)
       (a)
    
    Each of Purchaser and Seller shall have executed and delivered this letter; and(b)
    
    Wachovia shall be satisfied that the Policy remains in effect and comports with
the terms and conditions of the Program Documents.




---



##### 



original
  
 
 AGREEMENT:CONEXANT USA, LLC, as Purchaser
    
    
    
    CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC., as Sellerand as ServicerBy:
    
    /s/ Kerry K. Petry
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Kerry K. PetryTitle:
    
    VP and Treasurer
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    VP and TreasurerDate:
    
    10/05/07
    
    
    
    Date:
    
    10/05/07
office ar 609 5th Avenue. 10th Floor. New York, NY ·10017 

(Audrcss) 

hereby pur,uanr ro 'CCtion 03 of T1tk -19 of ttl.: U.S. Code: ilonHcrly l 00:'1 t'IJ I)f the Ft'tkral ·\\ iJIIOil Ac t 

of 19:\!:L J' amc:ndc:d l the p<:r, on !x•lt"' :1' it.' Agenr upon ''hom sen ol all Jrll.l pr<X'<'·''· :md :ill Prdc'l'. <kci,iorh . 

Jnd rcquiremcur' or the Depa r1rncnt (lf·Tran,ponarion Ill a\' be math:: for and on bel1.1lt' of ,ait.l cJnicr. he: all ptt: \ i"u' 

de,ignati0n' or· ag.:nr, nwd.: by ir to I he DOT. 

Name of Agent _________ D_o_r_, _H_a_in_b_a_c_h_(.:....d_h_a_in_b_a_c_·h-=@=g.::.g_h_-_a_ir_la_w_.c_o_n....: 1) ____ ____ _ 

(Please Pri nr) 

Address Garofalo Goerlich Hainbach PC, 1200 New Hampshire Ave NW, Ste. 590, Washington, DC 20036 

The Age nt so dcsignatcu has written his name and also his initials in rhe following space: 

Name _--N<:.iZ"-· __ 7 __ _ 

IN WITNESS WHER EOf. _______________ Compagnie Nationale Rovai Air Maroc 1 ___ _ _ _____ has cauc,cd 

(Name of Company) 

prcc,e nts ro be 'igncd in its name by Yassine 8errada, Vice President - Finance 

or said company . to be :111cstcd under its cmporate seal by 

on th1s A 9 

Compagnie Nationale Royal Air Maroc 

By: 

OST F 1010.5 (1 -95)
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerald
O. Hatler, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Gerald O. Hatler
-------------------------------------
Gerald O. Hatler
President and Chief Executive Officer

August 11, 2004

                                      -24-
# US, States, & Regions

# ARC Counties

# Source & Methodology

# MBD005FF847.doc

# MBD005FFD61.doc

# MBD005FEFDD.doc
jva_ex104.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.4


 


 



January 26, 2012







Mr. Andrew Gordon


c/o Coffee Holding Co., Inc.


3475 Victory Boulevard


Staten Island, New York 10314







Dear Andrew:







Reference is hereby made to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Coffee Holding Co., Inc. (the "Company") and you entered into on the 11th day of April, 2008 (the "Employment Agreement").  Capitalized terms used in this letter and not specifically defined in this letter shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement.







The purpose of this letter is to memorialize your consent to the 10% reduction in your annual Base Salary for the period January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 that was recommended by the Compensation Committee and to modify the Employment Agreement to reflect such agreement as follows:







1.  Notwithstanding the terms of Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement, your Base Salary for the period January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 shall be at the rate of Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($315,000) on an annualized basis.  Accordingly, effective as of January 1, 2012, the following is hereby deemed added after the last sentence of Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement:







Notwithstanding anything set forth in this Section 3.1 to the contrary, for the period January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, Executive’s annual base salary shall be Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($315,000).







2.  You acknowledge and agree that the reduction in your Base Salary to Three Hundred Fifteen Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($315,000) on an annualized basis for the period January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 shall not constitute Good Reason or otherwise be deemed a breach by the Company of the terms of the Employment Agreement.







3.   Except as modified by this letter, the terms of the Employment Agreement remain unmodified and in full force and effect.







[Signature Page Follows]











  





  











  








Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms set forth in this letter by signing the enclosed copy of this letter where indicated and returning it to me by not later than January 26, 2012.  Thank you for your continued contributions to the Company.







COFFEE HOLDING CO., INC.












By: /s/ David Gordon


     David Gordon


     Senior Vice President – Operations


     & Secretary







Agreed and Accepted this 26th day of January, 2012












/s/ Andrew Gordon 

Andrew Gordon
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 
**GROVERSELLERS ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL**

### 875

EU. BArotam

Oil.8 - rag8 **2**
p6r base par xew pltu aqalty.

. . and fat **au*** **OS produaton**  **rwll pay**  **Gha 8tato**  **the UalVldod**  **on.-** SiXtuath of Lb valw or the 8&l ub gba M88rvad her.IID, and Allu molmt8 to an ory? or the 8til.m

T& ltollaqulrbwnt AOCyu into?pmtd by th sugnae Court in the cu. of Onuu v. Robiron,8 8.U. (2) 6%. SaOtlolP2 of the **&at,** vhleh **ralbtar** to your **qtn8tlon** ud oodlrled @I Artto1a 5368, **ir** llatorplrto4 I.8 tbr oeurt’r oplnLononpbge66olnturuMora

%a IntwpMt rbr ACb **to** tir b ahi1wI prior of 10 aoat pop tire p8r' ULlw lad the VaUO Or OII8-htt8OMh Or t&8 -88 PrOduorion in8 of **ooet** to the 8tbte, for vhioh the4 8tbto i8 villiag to rell **the** oil and gu. . .n The u8q ol rhe taxm "t&8 v~lue'o? one-rlxtorarh of th8 @war8 producslon ima of aoet. . .' u ir **uard** in the abeo of ormto v. Robleon, auat be thr tam v-0 ~~itf 48 i8 w0d ff; *en the Baa8 wbnlng aa tb, 19318bl.r AOZ. APt%k%%C, V. A. C. 8.

1a Un ah*,*

or uintoman vp JtoDoMld,q2 2. V. pm; **Jurtior** 8hup daslner **th** tern in* **roXblLJ** u

"I% tam "tru royblty" intmduoad into thk8 AOt WI m t&t t& iatWO8t Ms~nad to the 

### rut* W xbuslr **pm&a-d** on l oho ol bad8 aold V&W tb t.N oftb. Aiot PII not bob? any upn8a or the pxmotlan, 8blO **or daUwry**  **therooi.**

IL18 ourOpiJIl~fb8tJOW~w8t1oaim8 kom **uuvorad br**  t& **8wr.r Court**  **Of thi.**  WM.. **U., th.Iyfo?o,**  **dVl8. rou**  **thao the**  **8tatuto8** 

### solat **to** t&e quortioa nqlun **that the**  mB*t* Moeire 1ta 8hbM of tlu valua at pmdwtlon on a lm$ -18, CM. fwr daduotiam of uy U or UBO of uq Oh8MoteP. TM8 18 tnu vhu.b~ the mlmrel Ms*nuion in the 1.u. b8 tb - of .r/rcitb zequisad by lu (DS SOP l lw#or

aaovat W8wMd by tm l r raoo

omo? a. yew orthe **8tbto.** tteollovrthBt tba rurf8oooroos a8 yeat or tM

### 876

EOR. BBBO- 0i108 - ?uO )
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0289. MURIAL MONTIA v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A. et al.

Murial Montia filed suit against Long Beach Mortgage Company, JP Morgan

Chase Bank, National Association, and PennyMac Corporation, alleging a quiet title

claimand seeking the appointment of a special master. After the trial court dismissed

the complaint for failure to state a claim, Montia filed an application for discretionary

appeal in this Court.

 The Supreme Court, however, has original appellate jurisdiction over cases

involving title to land. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (1). Because

this appeal involvestitle to land, jurisdiction appearsto lie in the Supreme Court. See

Tharp v. Harpagon Co., 278 Ga. 654, 655 (1) (604 SE2d 156) (2004). Accordingly,

this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

03/23/2016

March 23, 2016
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0984 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-022-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model EC225LP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 4 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent the jamming of the cockpit fuel shut-off 

controls so that a pilot can shut down an engine during an engine fire or during an emergency

landing.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $4,943 for the replacement

Labor per Helicopter

(0.25 work-hour x 

$85/work-hour for the 

measurement)

(4 work-hour x $85/workhour for the lubrication)

(4 work-hour x $85/workhour for the replacement)

$21

$340

$340

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $21 for the measurement

$340 for the lubrication

$5,283 for the replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $84 for the measurement

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: James Blyn
I

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1895

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain cash rent

farm landlords to deduct soil and water conservation expenditures.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 20, 1996

Mr. GRASSLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain cash rent farm landlords to deduct soil and water

conservation expenditures.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEDUCTION FOR SOIL AND WATER CONSERVA4 TION EXPENDITURES EXTENDED TO CERTAIN

5 CASH RENT LANDLORDS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (c) of section 175 of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to soil and

8 water conservation expenditures) is amended by adding at

9 the end the following new paragraph:
2

•S 1895 IS

1 ‘‘(4) CASH RENT LANDLORDS.—A taxpayer

2 shall be treated as engaged in the business of farm3 ing with respect to any land used in farming if such

4 taxpayer rents such land (regardless of the basis for

5 the rental payment) to a member of the taxpayer’s

6 family (as defined in section 2032A(e)(2)).’’.

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

8 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after

9 December 31, 1996, in taxable years ending after such

10 date.

Æ