alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Digene Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Charles M. Fleischman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 that, to my knowledge:

1.          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

| |                                                                  | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Charles M. Fleischman                                       
| |                                                                 
| | Charles M. Fleischman
Chief Financial Officer
September 22, 2003
#### Michael W. WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John E. POTTER, United States Postmaster General, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-1816.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 4, 2003.

*199Gary Diamond, Waldman *&*Diamond, Chartered, Kensington, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas M. DiBiagio, United States Attorney, Paul E. Soeffing, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Michael W. Walker appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on his claim under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Walker v. Henderson,*No. CA-01-1348-DKC (D. Md. June 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
II 

Calendar No. 316 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 452 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 16, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 324 West Saint Louis Street in Pacific, Missouri, as the ‘‘Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JEFFREY L. WHITE, JR. POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 324 West Saint Louis Street in 

7 Pacific, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Specialist Jeffrey L. White, Jr. Post Office’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 452 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Specialist Jeffrey L. 

5 White, Jr. Post Office’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 316 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 452 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostWhite, Jr. Post Office’’. in Pacific, Missouri, as the ‘‘Specialist Jeffrey L. al Service located at 324 West Saint Louis Street 

FEBRUARY 15, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1465

To extend au pair programs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 11, 1995

Mr. HELMS (for himself, Mr. DODD, and Mr. KERRY) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

A BILL

To extend au pair programs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AU PAIR PROGRAMS.

4 (a) REPEAL.—Section 8 of the Eisenhower Exchange

5 Fellowship Act of 1990 (Public Law 101–454) is repealed.

6 (b) AUTHORITY FOR AU PAIR PROGRAMS.—The Di7 rector of the United States Information Agency is author8 ized to continue to administer an au pair program, operat9 ing on a world-wide basis, through fiscal year 1999.

10 (c) REPORT.—Not later than October 1, 1998, the

11 Director of the United States Information Agency shall

12 submit a report regarding the continued extension of au
2

•S 1465 IS

1 pair programs to the Committee on Foreign Relations of

2 the Senate and the Committee on International Relations

3 of the House of Representatives. This report shall specifi4 cally detail the compliance of all au pair organizations

5 with regulations governing au pair programs as published

6 on February 15, 1995.

Æ
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS

I, C. Patrick Machado, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Medivation, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ C. Patrick Machado                                               
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | C. Patrick Machado Chief
Business Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Rasmussen,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gary Rasmussen


Gary Rasmussen,


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer





May  24, 2010
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United St ates District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1780

___________ Allen Huenefeld, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Northern v. * District of Iowa. * Michael Carr; Bill Elam, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 20, 2010 Filed: October 5, 2010

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Iowa inmate Allen Huenefeld appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ac tion. Having conducted careful de novo review of the record, see Mack v. Dillon , 594 F.3d 620, 622 (8th Cir. 2010) (per curiam) (standard of review), we agree withthe district court that summary judgment was warranted. Further, Huenefeld did not make the required showing below that summary judgment was premature; and hi s complaints on appeal regarding the-2- effectiveness of his appointed counsel are not a basis for reversal, see Taylor v. Dickel , 293 F.3d 427, 431 (8th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL A. LICHT; PATRICIA A. )

ANDREWS; and GUALARIO, LICHT & )

ANDREWS, P.A., )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-154

)

ANTHONY J. GUALARIO, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 31, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier 

County; James R. Shenko, Judge.

John F. Hooley of The Law Offices of 

John F. Hooley, P.A., Naples, for 

Appellants. 

James A. Bonaquist, Jr.; John Thomas 

Cardillo; and Jacquelyn A. Boudreau 

of Cardillo, Keith & Bonaquist, P.A., 

Naples, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and CASANUEVA and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Annual notice of revision.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Trade Commission announces the revised thresholds for interlocking directorates required by the 1990 amendment of Section 8 of the Clayton Act.

# DATES:

January 22, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Grengs (202-326-2612), Bureau of Competition, Office of Policy and Coordination.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits, with certain exceptions, one person from serving as a director or officer of two competing corporations if two thresholds are met. Competitor corporations are covered by Section 8 if each one has capital, surplus, and undivided profits aggregating more than $10,000,000, with the exception that no corporation is covered if the competitive sales of either corporation are less than $1,000,000. Section 8(a)(5) requires the Federal Trade Commission to revise those thresholds annually, based on the change in gross national product. The new thresholds, which take effect immediately, are $48,559,000 for Section 8(a)(1), and $4,855,900 for Section 8(a)(2)(A).

*Authority:*15 U.S.C. 19(a)(5).                

April J. Tabor,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-00929 Filed 1-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James E. Horswill, President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.
                The report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
                The information
      contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  Date:  August
14, 2009





/s/ James E.
Horswill


James E.
Horswill


President
and Chief Financial Officer
exhibit10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


IMPERIUM ADVISERS, LLC


515 Madison Avenue


New York, NY 10022


 


January 30, 2012


 


Integrated BioPharma, Inc.


225 Long Avenue


Hillside, NJ 07205


 


Re:           Extension of Forbearance Agreement


 



Ladies and Gentlemen:




 


    Reference is made to the Forbearance Agreement, dated as of October 4, 2011 (as amended, the “Forbearance Agreement”), by and between Integrated BioPharma, Inc. (the “Company”) and Imperium Advisers, LLC, in its capacity as collateral agent (in such “Collateral Agent”) for itself and the Investors referred to therein.  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this letter shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Forbearance Agreement.


 


    In consideration of the foregoing, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby acknowledged, confirmed and agreed that all references in the Forbearance Agreement to “December 31, 2011” are hereby amended to mean “February 7, 2012”.


 


    Furthermore, any interest payments which are due and payable to the Collateral Agent by the Company on or after the date of this letter through February 7, 2012 pursuant to terms of the 8% Senior Secured Notes of Integrated BioPharma, Inc. shall accrue and be due and payable on February 8, 2012.


 


    Except as expressly modified pursuant hereto, no other changes or modifications to the Forbearance Agreement are intended or implied, and in all other respects, the Forbearance Agreement is hereby specifically ratified, restated and confirmed by the parties hereto as of the date hereof.


 


    The effectiveness of this letter agreement shall be subject to the receipt by Collateral Agent of an original (or electronic copy) of this letter agreement duly executed and delivered by the Company.


 


Very truly yours,


 


IMPERIUM ADVISERS, LLC,


                    as Collateral Agent on behalf of Investors


 


By:  /s/ John Michaelson                                       


Name:  John Michaelson


Title:  Manager


 


ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


 


INTEGRATED BIOPHARMA, INC.


 


By:  /s/ Dina L. Masi                                                 


Name:  Dina L. Masi                            


Title:  CFO
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 11410 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. LOUIS GRIEGO, JR. , also known as Big Lou , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 3

Before DAVIS, CLEMENT, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Louis Griego, Jr. appeals the 168

- month sentence he received for conspiring to distribute methamphetamine. He contends that the district court improperly calculated his guidelines rang e when it concluded that he was not entitled to an additional one

- level reduction for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b).

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 20, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-11410 Document: 00512740102 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2014No. 13

- 11410

The Government acknowledges that it erred in withholding the reduction on the ground that Griego did not waive his right to appeal. See United States v. Villegas Palacios , --- F.3d

---- , 2014 WL 211909 6, at * 1 (5th Cir. May 21, 2014). But w e need not vacate the sentence, or resolve whether the Government’s other alleged base s for withholding the reduction were
proper , because any error was harmless. See United States v. Richardson , 676
F .3d 491, 511

– 12 (5th Cir. 2012); United States v. Bonilla , 524 F.3d 647, 656 (5th Cir. 2008). After considering the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors , t he district court unequivocally stated that it would impose the 168

- month
sentence regardless whether the additional one

- point reduction should apply

. Indeed, the sentence imposed was within the guidelines range that would have applied if the on e
- level r eduction had been granted. Accordingly, a ny error in calculating Griego’s guidelines range was harmless. S ee Richardson , 676 F.3d
at 511. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 13-11410 Document: 00512740102 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2014
CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Harry Chauhan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Atlantic Wine
Agencies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and

<PAGE>

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 18, 2005

/s/ Harry Chauhan
------------------------------
Name: Harry Chauhan
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2


Certification of Vice-Chairman and President

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Century  Casinos,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





     Date: March 11, 2003

     /s/ Peter Hoetzinger
     -----------------
     Peter Hoetzinger
     Vice-Chairman and President
I

★

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1757

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 16, 1996

Referred to the Committee on Commerce

AN ACT

To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill

of Rights Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Developmental Disabil5 ities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of

6 1996’’.
2

S 1757 RFH1S

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

2 Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assist3 ance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended

4 by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting

5 ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

6 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

7 PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL

8 RIGHTS.

9 Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assist10 ance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended

11 by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting

12 ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

13 SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

14 UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.

15 Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities As16 sistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is

17 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and

18 inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

19 SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

20 PROJECTS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

21 Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities As22 sistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is
3

S 1757 RFH1S

1 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

Passed the Senate July 12, 1996.

Attest: KELLY D. JOHNSTON,

Secretary.
CERTIFICATIONS
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Phlo Corporation and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James B. Hovis, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 8, 2005

                                /s/ James B. Hovis
                                ---------------------------
                                James B. Hovis
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                Principal Financial Officer