alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
30


  POWER OF ATTORNEY
  -----------------

                                  (FORM 10-K)
                                  -----------

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., a
Minnesota corporation (the "Company"), and each of the undersigned directors of
the Company, hereby constitutes and appoints J. Kevin Gleason and Abe Levine and
each of them (with full power to each of them to act alone) its/his/her true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, for it/him/her and on its/him/her and in
its/his/her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities to sign, execute,
affix its/his/her seal thereto and file the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company and Adams Outdoor Advertising Limited Partnership for the year ended
December 31, 1996 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, with
any amendment or amendments thereto, with all exhibits and any and all documents
required to be filed with respect thereto with any regulatory authority.

     There is hereby granted to said attorneys, and each of them, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary
to be done in respect of the foregoing as fully as it/he/she or
itself/himself/herself might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     This Power of Attorney may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
one and the same instrument and any of the undersigned directors may execute
this Power of Attorney by signing any such counterpart.

     Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc. has caused this Power of Attorney to be
executed in its name by its Chief Executive Officer on the 31st day of March,
1997

                         ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC.


                         By     /s/ J. Kevin Gleason
                            -------------------------
                                J. Kevin Gleason
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                and President
<PAGE>
 
31


The undersigned, directors of ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., have hereunto set
their hands as of the 31st day of March, 1997.



     /s/ Stephen Adams                                /s/ J. Kevin Gleason
---------------------------------            -----------------------------------
     Stephen Adams                                    J. Kevin Gleason



     /s/ David Frith-Smith                            /s/ George Pransky
---------------------------------            -----------------------------------
     David Frith-Smith                                George Pransky



     /s/ Andris A. Baltins
---------------------------------
     Andris A. Baltins



                               D I R E C T O R S
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1577 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1577

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications 
  and Records Commission for fiscal years 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE NATIONAL HISTORICAL 
              PUBLICATIONS AND RECORDS COMMISSION.

    Section 2504(f)(1) of title 44, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (F) by striking out ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (G) by striking out the period and 
        inserting in lieu thereof a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
                    ``(H) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1998;
                    ``(I) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1999;
                    ``(J) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2000; and
                    ``(K) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.''.

            Passed the Senate July 25, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1577

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To authorize appropriations for the National Historical Publications 
  and Records Commission for fiscal years 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.
```
#### STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, Petitioner, v. Lamar ALEXANDER, Secretary of United States Department of Education, Respondent.

No. 91-3505.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted March 11, 1992.

Decided June 25, 1992.

*2Michael L. Brustein, Washington, D.C., argued (Mark Barnett, Craig M. Eichstadt, Leigh M. Manasevit and Yolanda R. Gallegos, on brief), for petitioner.

Stephen H. Freid, Washington, D.C., argued (Jeffrey C. Martin, on brief), for respondent.

Before McMILLIAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this petition, the State of South Dakota seeks judicial review of a decision of the Secretary of Education that vacated an administrative law judge’s decision and remanded the case to the ALT for further proceedings. The Assistant Secretary for Vocational and Adult Education of the United States Department of Education had issued a preliminary departmental decision against South Dakota seeking refund of $150,000 of federal money on three grounds, one of which was that South Dakota improperly applied the money to interest payments. South Dakota appealed the Assistant Secretary’s decision. The administrative law judge held that the Assistant Secretary’s preliminary departmental decision had failed to properly state a prima facie case as to the interest payments issue and, therefore, the ALJ returned the entire preliminary departmental decision to the Assistant Secretary. The Assistant Secretary in turn appealed the ALJ’s decision to the Secretary. The Secretary vacated the AU’s decision, stating that the Assistant Secretary had indeed stated a prima facie case, and that even if she had not, it would not have been appropriate to return the entire preliminary departmental decision because of a defect in one part. The Secretary remanded the case to the AU for a determination on the merits. The State of South Dakota then brought this appeal, and the Secretary has moved to dismiss.

Because the issues involved the conflicting claims of the Secretary of the United States Department of Education and the State of South Dakota, we stayed administrative proceedings, Order of Jan. 29, 1992; heard oral argument; and received briefing on the merits.

We conclude that the order from which South Dakota appeals is not a final agency action reviewable under 20 U.S.C. § 1234g(a) (1988). Under 20 U.S.C. § 1234a(g) (1988), “[a] decision of the Office [of Administrative Law Judges] shall become final agency action ... unless the Secretary ... (2) remands the decision to the Office.” Of course, remand to the Office of Administrative Law Judges is exactly what happened in this case. Therefore, there is no final agency action, and we must dismiss this premature appeal. When final agency action has been taken, the aggrieved party may then appeal.

Our order staying administrative proceedings pending argument is dissolved, and the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 10.7

MASTER OFFSHORE AGREEMENT

This
Master Offshore Agreement is made effective this day of February 1, 2004 ("Effective Date") by and between Xansa (India) Ltd., having its registered office at C-2,
Sector 1, Noida, 201301, India (hereinafter referred to as "Xansa" which shall include all its divisions, subsidiaries and other related entities or successors in interest and permitted assigns),

AND

Lawson
Software, Inc., dba Lawson Software, a Delaware USA corporation whose principal offices are located at 380 St. Peter, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 USA (hereinafter referred to as
"COMPANY").

WHEREAS, Xansa is in the business of software development, services and related information technology activities;

WHEREAS,Xansa has obtained Level 5 CMM certification (as defined below);

WHEREAS, in reliance on Xansa's Level 5 CMM Certification and Xansa's representation to COMPANY to continue to perform services under this
Agreement at a minimum of the then current Level 5 CMM and in accordance with the Performance Criteria (as defined below), COMPANY has
selected Xansa over other services providers to provide certain information technology-related services as specified in the Statement(s) of Work (as defined below); and

WHEREAS, Xansa and COMPANY want to specify the terms and conditions under which, among other things, Xansa will provide such services to
COMPANY.

NOW, THEREFORE,in consideration of the foregoing premises and mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, Xansa and COMPANY agree
as follows:



1

---



2

---



3

---

4

---



5

---





6

---



7

---





8

---

9

---



10

---



11

---



12

---



13

---





14

---





15

---





16

---



17

---





18

---





19

---



20

---

21

---



22

---



FOR Xansa (India) Ltd.:Signature

/s/ Murali VullagantiName

Murali VullagantiTitle

Managing DirectorFOR Lawson Software Inc.:Signature

/s/ Robert G. BarbieriName

Robert G. BarbieriTitle

Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer




23

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1

                 NATIONAL EDUCATION CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    CALCULATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
                (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Year Ended                                    
                                        ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           1995             1994           1993          1992           1991
                                           ----             ----           ----          ----           ----
<S>                                     <C>              <C>             <C>           <C>           <C>
INCOME (LOSS) FROM
CONTINUING OPERATIONS                    $(87,223)       $(14,093)       $10,092       $(6,284)      $   (498)
                                         ========        ========        =======       =======       ======== 

NET INCOME (LOSS)                        $(87,223)       $(63,545)       $(9,665)      $   515       $  5,490
                                         ========        ========        =======       =======       ======== 
COMMON STOCK:
Shares outstanding from beginning
  of period                                29,578          29,405         29,968        29,822         29,718
Pro rata shares:
  Stock options exercised                      31             134             41           136             12
  Shares purchased for treasury,
   from date of purchase                       --              (7)          (380)           (6)            --
  Assumed exercise of stock options
   using treasury stock method                465             108            226           344            386
  Shares issued for restricted stock          292              --             --            --             --
  Conversion of Sub. Debentures             1,527              --             --            --             --
                                         --------        --------        -------       -------       --------
  Weighted average number of shares
   outstanding                             31,893          29,640         29,855        30,296         30,116
                                         ========        ========        =======       =======       ======== 
PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
  FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS             $  (2.73)       $   (.48)       $   .34       $  (.21)      $   (.02)
                                         ========        ========        =======       =======       ======== 
PRIMARY EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE        $  (2.73)       $  (2.14)       $  (.32)         $.02       $    .18 
                                         ========        ========        =======       =======       ======== 

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Harry Chauhan, President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Wine
Agencies Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 18, 2004


/s/ Harry Chauhan
-----------------
Harry Chauhan
President and Chief Financial Officer
f10k2010a1ex10xxvi_chinayida.htm



Exhibit 10.26




 


[English Summary]







State-Owned Land Use Rights Agreement







Party A: Yongtai County Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources


Party B: Yida (Fujian) Tourism Group Co., Ltd.







Land Area:


130,513 square meters located in Changkeng, Duishan and Qitou, etc. villages in Xianglu town







Purpose of the Land:


3.6692 hectare for scenic views and facilities; 2.4954 hectare for hotels and restaurants; 6.8867 hectare for entertainment and sports







Term:


Party A agrees to deliver the land use right to Party B by October 19, 2010, for a total of 12,805,000 RMB, for a period of 40 years.







Party B agrees to commence the project under this Agreement before August 4, 2011 and complete it before August 4, 2013.


 


Jurisdiction:


Laws of China







Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, either party can resolve the dispute by the courts.







Date of the Agreement:


August 9, 2010


 


 

1
Amendment No. 7 to the Information Technology Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Confidential Treatment is Requested by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. 

Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. 200.83 
 NOTE: PORTIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE THE SUBJECT OF A 
 CONFIDENTIAL
TREATMENT REQUEST BY THE REGISTRANT TO THE 
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. SUCH PORTIONS HAVE BEEN 

REDACTED AND ARE MARKED WITH A “[****]” IN PLACE OF THE REDACTED LANGUAGE. 

AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO THE 
 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 7 to
the Information Technology Services Agreement (this “Amendment”), dated as of October 10, 2011 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) is to the Information Technology Services Agreement, between INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION (“Supplier Party”) and BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC. (“Customer Party”), dated as of March 31, 2010, as amended (the “Agreement”). Supplier Party and
Customer Party shall be jointly referred to herein as “Contracting Parties.” Unless otherwise indicated herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 

WHEREAS, the Contracting Parties desire to modify the terms and conditions of the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the agreements set forth below, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date, the Contracting
Parties agree as follows: 
 ARTICLE 1 AMENDMENTS TO THE AGREEMENT. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

CRITICAL MILESTONES FOR TRANSITION SERVICES 
 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement and its Exhibits, the Contracting Parties agree that subsection (2) of ARTICLE 2.03. Critical Milestones of the Agreement and all
related references to [****] in the Agreement no longer apply. 
 ARTICLE 2 ENTIRE AGREEMENT. 

This Amendment, together with the Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement of the Contracting Parties with respect to the subject matter
herein. Except as specifically amended herein, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified in all respects. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in accordance with, the Laws of the State of
New York without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of law. 

*            *          
  *            * 
  

			
	Broadridge IBM Amendment 7	  	IBM and Broadridge Confidential








 Confidential Treatment is Requested by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. 

Pursuant to 17 C.F.R. 200.83 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized representatives of the Contracting Parties have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date. 

 

									
	INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION	 		 	 BROADRIDGE FINANCIAL
 SOLUTIONS, INC.

					
	by:	 	Scott A. Morin	 		 	by:	 	/s/ John Hogan
	name: Scott A. Morin	 		 	name: John Hogan
	title: Vice President	 		 	title: President and COO
	date: 10/10/2011	 		 	date: 10/6/2011

  

			
	Broadridge IBM Amendment 7	  	IBM and Broadridge Confidential
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Barbara Gail HARRISON-PHILPOT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-30212.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 23, 1992.

Before WRIGHT, BEEZER and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The opinion filed July 2, 1992, authored by Judge Wiggins, is withdrawn.
icb_8k0124ex101.htm


 


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


VOTING AGREEMENT


 


Each of the undersigned directors of Indiana Community Bancorp (“ICB”) hereby agrees in his individual capacity as a shareholder to vote his shares of ICB Common Stock that are registered in his personal name (and agrees to use his reasonable efforts to cause all additional shares of ICB Common Stock owned jointly by him with any other person or by his spouse or over which he has voting influence or control to be voted) in favor of the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Old National Bancorp and ICB, dated January 24, 2012 (the “Agreement”).  In addition, each of the undersigned directors hereby agrees not to make any transfers of shares of ICB Common Stock with the purpose of avoiding his agreements set forth in the preceding sentence and agrees to cause any transferee of such shares to abide by the terms of this Voting Agreement.  Each of the undersigned is entering into this Voting Agreement solely in his capacity as an individual shareholder and, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Voting Agreement, nothing in this Voting Agreement is intended or shall be construed to require any of the undersigned, in his capacity as a director of ICB, to act or fail to act in accordance with his fiduciary duties in such director capacity. Furthermore, none of the undersigned makes any agreement or understanding herein in his capacity as a director of ICB.  Notwithstanding any contrary provision herein, this Voting Agreement shall be effective from the date hereof and shall terminate and be of no further force and effect upon the earliest of (a) the consummation of the Merger (as defined in the Agreement); (b) the termination of the Agreement in accordance with its terms; or (c) the taking of such action whereby a majority of ICB’s Board of Directors, in accordance with the terms and conditions of Section 5.06 of the Agreement, withdraws its favorable recommendation of the Agreement to its shareholders.  This Voting Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.


 


Dated this 24th day of January, 2012.


 







 



	/s/ John T. Beatty	  	/s/ Harold Force
	
John T. Beatty

	  	
Harold Force


	  	  	  
	/s/ David W. Laitinen, MD	  	/s/ William J. Blaser
	
David W. Laitinen, MD

	  	
William J. Blaser


	  	  	  
	/s/ John K. Keach, Jr.	  	/s/ John M. Miller
	
John K. Keach, Jr.

	  	
John M. Miller
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5162 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5162

  To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 
pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of consumer 
 product in order to permit the issuance of safety standards for such 
          articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2018

   Ms. Kelly of Illinois (for herself, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Vargas, Mr. 
Lynch, Mr. Cummings, Ms. Clark of Massachusetts, Mr. Moulton, Mr. Ryan 
of Ohio, Mrs. Watson Coleman, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York, Mr. 
 Yarmuth, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. DeSaulnier, Mr. 
 Meeks, Ms. McCollum, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Keating, Mr. Danny K. 
   Davis of Illinois, Ms. Plaskett, and Ms. Brownley of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 
pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of consumer 
 product in order to permit the issuance of safety standards for such 
          articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firearm Safety Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF EXCLUSION OF FIREARMS FROM THE DEFINITION OF 
              CONSUMER PRODUCT.

    Section 3(a)(5) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
2052(a)(5)) is amended by striking subparagraph (E) and redesignating 
subparagraphs (F) through (I) as subparagraphs (E) through (H), 
respectively.
                                 <all>
```
1 Attachment 

Vanessa - Here is the report. NOX Control Update to PPL Montana Colstrip Units 1&2 BART Analysis. It is marked 

"amended October 18, 2011. We are submitting this to help avoid future confusion as to which report is the most recent. 

 

I notice that on EPA's regional haze website for MT, the older version is still linked. 

 

If you have any questions, please let me know. 

 

Thanks 

 

Jim 

 

 

 

 

 

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the 

recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for 

delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error 

and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 

received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

Amended BART Update report for Units 1&2 for NOx

Parker, James M 

to: 

Vanessa Hinkle 

02/13/2012 05:46 PM 

Hide Details 

From: "Parker, James M" <jmparker@pplweb.com> 

To: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

NOx Control Update to PPL Montana's Colstrip Generating Station BART Report (Revised _ Amended).pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\vhinkle\Local Settings\Temp\notes7A42A6\~web9165.htm 3/27/2012