alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4968 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4968

To permanently reauthorize the Rio Puerco Management Committee and the 
                Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2018

  Mr. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico (for himself and Ms. Michelle Lujan 
    Grisham of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently reauthorize the Rio Puerco Management Committee and the 
                Rio Puerco Watershed Management Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rio Puerco Watershed Management 
Program Reauthorization Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF RIO PUERCO MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE.

    Section 401(b) of division I of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 
Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4146; 123 Stat. 
1108) is amended by striking paragraph (4).

SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE RIO PUERCO WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    Section 401(e) of division I of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 
Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4148; 123 Stat. 
1108) is amended by striking ``for the 10 fiscal years beginning after 
the date of enactment of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 
2009'' and inserting ``for fiscal year 2017 and each fiscal year 
thereafter''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 3.1**AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION**OFFAMILY HOME HEALTH SERVICES INC.a Nevada Corporation      Pursuant to the provisions of Section 78.403 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the undersignedcorporation, Family Home Health Services Inc. (the “Corporation”), a Nevada corporation, adopts thefollowing Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as of this date:     1. The name of the Corporation is Family Home Health Services Inc. The date of filing of theoriginal Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada wasNovember 17, 2000. The Articles were subsequently amended on November 3, 2004.     2. The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation amend, restate and integrate theprovisions of the Articles of Incorporation and subsequent Amendment to Articles of the Corporationand have been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of the General Corporation Law of theState of Nevada pursuant to a resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.     3. The number of shares of the Corporation outstanding and entitled to vote on an amendment tothe Articles of Incorporation is 26,667,254; that this Amendment and Restatement has been consentedto and approved by a majority vote of the stockholders holding a least a majority of each class ofstock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.     4. The text of the Articles of Incorporation, as heretofore amended or supplemented, is herebyamended and restated in its entirety as follows:**ARTICLE I**
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1747 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1747

To correct the marking requirements for American-made feather and down-
                            filled products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1996

Mr. Gramm (for himself and Ms. Moseley-Braun) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To correct the marking requirements for American-made feather and down-
                            filled products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKING OF CERTAIN AMERICAN-MADE TEXTILE PRODUCTS.

    Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) is amended 
by redesignating subsections (f), (g), and (h) as subsections (g), (h), 
and (i), respectively, and inserting before subsection (g), as 
redesignated, the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Marking of Certain American-Made Textile Products.--An 
exception under subsection (a)(3) of this title shall apply for textile 
products classified under HTS subheading 9404.90: Provided, That such 
products are manufactured in the United States and that such 
manufacturing effects a change to subheading 9404.90 from any other 
heading: Provided further, That such products are filled with feathers 
and/or down: Provided further, That such product shells are of cotton 
fabric, no less than 85 per centum by weight of cotton.''.
                                 <all>
```
Water Quality Standards Regulatory Revisions Rulemaking

MEMORANDUM TO RECORD SUBJECT: Meeting with State-EPA Roundtable DATE: Thursday, March 6, 2014 TIME: 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM (Eastern)
Participants: EPA – Sara Hisel-McCoy, Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan, Janita Aguirre, Christina Christensen, Heather Goss, Gary Russo, Wendy Hoffman, Ruth Chemerys, Virginia Kibler, Peter Ford, Glynis Hill, Ellen Weitzler, Wayne Jackson, Lauren Petter, Lisa Perras-Gordon, David Pfeifer, Russell Nelson, Ann Lavaty, Phillip Woods, William Beckwith ACWA/States – Melissa McCoy (ACWA), Alex Barron (Virginia), Connie Brower (North Carolina), Martha Clark Mettler (Indiana), Jason Childress (Oklahoma), Mike Tate (Kansas), Sarah Johnson (Colorado), Lindsay Patterson (Wyoming), Nancy Sonafrank (Alaska)
Summary of Meeting: Participants discussed the ground rules for the State-EPA Roundtable and discussed key issues raised about the proposed rule in public comments. Feedback provided by the States will help inform which issues EPA raises at Early Management Guidance. Agenda TOPIC TIME LEAD__________ 1. Workgroup and Roundtable Introductions 10 min Aguirre 2. Welcome, Purpose & Ground Rules 10 min Hisel-McCoy/Robiou 3. Upcoming Critical Milestones & Dates 5 min Aguirre 4. Discussion of Key Issues Raised in Comments 60 min Topic Leads/All 5. Questions & Answers 20 min All 6. Table Issues & Next Steps 10 min Aguirre 6. Reminders for next workgroup meeting 5 min Aguirre
II

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1485

To require the Secretary of the Interior to submit a report on Indian tribal

school construction funds to certain committees of Congress, and for

other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

DECEMBER 19, 1995

Mr. PRESSLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To require the Secretary of the Interior to submit a report

on Indian tribal school construction funds to certain

committees of Congress, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON FUNDING OF FACILITY IMPROVE4 MENT, REPAIR, AND CONSTRUCTION OF

5 SCHOOLS OF THE BUREAU OF INDIAN AF6 FAIRS.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the

8 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior

9 shall prepare and submit to the Committee on Indian Af-
2

•S 1485 IS

1 fairs of the Senate and the Subcommittee on Native Amer2 ican and Insular Affairs of the Committee on Resources

3 of the House of Representatives a report on the amounts

4 made available to the Department of the Interior for facil5 ity improvement, repair, and new construction of schools

6 of the Bureau of Indian Affairs under part B of title XI

7 of the Education Amendments of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 2001

8 et seq.).

9 (b) CONTENT OF REPORT.—The report prepared

10 under subsection (a) shall—

11 (1) for each of fiscal years 1992 through 1995,

12 specify—

13 (A) the amounts made available to the De14 partment of the Interior for facility improve15 ment, repair, and new construction of schools of

16 the Bureau of Indian Affairs under part B of

17 title XI of the Education Amendments of 1978

18 (25 U.S.C. 2001 et seq.); and

19 (B) any amount of those amounts that

20 were not obligated during the fiscal year for

21 which the funds were made available; and

22 (2) include information concerning the availabil23 ity of funds for facility improvement, repair, and
3

•S 1485 IS

1 new construction of schools of the Bureau of Indian

2 Affairs prior to fiscal year 1992.

Æ
exhibit101_012712.htm






  





  











  








Section 3:  EX-10.1







AMENDMENT TO FREEZE BENEFIT ACCRUALS UNDER


EXECUTIVE LONG TERM COMPENSATION AGREEMENT







This Amendment is adopted as of this 30th day of December, 2011, by and between Sound Community Bank and Sound Financial, Inc. (collectively, the “Employer”) and Laura Lee Stewart, an individual resident of the State of Washington (the “Executive”).







WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive have previously entered into an Executive Long Term Compensation Agreement effective August 14, 2007 (the “Agreement”), an unfunded arrangement maintained to encourage the Executive to remain an employee of the Employer;







WHEREAS, the Agreement is designed to provide retirement benefits (the “Benefits”) to the Executive upon his retirement, death, or disability, payable out of the Employer’s general assets; and







WHEREAS, the Employer and the Executive have agreed to freeze the accrual of Benefits under the Agreement as of December 30, 2011;







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, the Agreement is hereby amended by adding new Section 2.2 as follows:







2.2           Freeze in Accrued Benefit.  Effective December 30, 2011, notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (i) no additional service or compensation will be credited under the Agreement and  (ii) accrued benefits hereunder will be frozen such that no additional benefits (including disability and death benefits under Article 3) will be accrued under this Agreement.  Such frozen accrued benefits will be paid in accordance with the terms of the Agreement in a manner consistent with section 409A of the Code.











  





  











  













 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and a duly authorized officer of the Employer have signed this Agreement as of the date first written above.













	
THE EXECUTIVE:

	  	
Sound Community Bank

	  
	  	  	  	  
	
 /s/Laura Lee Stewart

	
By

	
 /s/Tyler Myers

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
Its:

	
 Chairman of the Board

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	  	
Sound Financial, Inc.

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
By

	
 /s/Tyler Myers

	  
	  	  	  	  
	  	
Its:

	
 Chairman of the Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         1894722                   38116
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2697248                  800077
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4866707                  892600
<PP&E>                                         3573127                  500056
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8538045                 1478035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1023369                  997342
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         47940                   21870
<OTHER-SE>                                     6324924                  249813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8538045                 1478035
<SALES>                                        9507666                 4919270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9507666                 4919270
<CGS>                                          7003882                 3887709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7003882                 3887709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2171872                  875039
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              103770                   80894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 320240                   75628
<INCOME-TAX>                                     75000                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    245240                   75628
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07                     .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AL PIERRO,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 10-70074

Tax Ct. No. 18809-07

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from a Decision of the

United States Tax Court

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Al Pierro appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision upholding the

Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination of a deficiency and additions to

tax for tax year 2002. We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482(a)(1). We

FILED

MAR 06 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-70074

review de novo the Tax Court’s legal conclusions, and for clear error its factual

findings. Hardy v. Comm’r, 181 F.3d 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 1999). We affirm. 

The Tax Court properly upheld the Commissioner’s tax determination

because the evidence at trial established that $12,500 was paid to the Internal

Revenue Service (“IRS”) on Pierro’s behalf in 2002, but he did not file a tax return

for that year or pay the taxes due on that amount. See Old Colony Trust Co. v.

Comm’r, 279 U.S. 716, 729 (1929) (payments made directly to IRS on taxpayer’s

behalf constitute taxable income to the taxpayer); see also 26 U.S.C. § 6651(a)(1),

(a)(2) (providing for additions to tax where taxpayer fails, without reasonable

cause, timely to file a tax return or to pay the taxes due).

Pierro’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1684 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1684

  To require that applications for passports for minors have parental 
                              signatures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 1996

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require that applications for passports for minors have parental 
                              signatures.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PASSPORTS ISSUED FOR CHILDREN UNDER 16.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of title IX of the Act of June 15, 1917 
(22 U.S.C. 213) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Before'' and inserting ``(a) In 
        General.--Before'', and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Passports Issued for Children Under 16.--
            ``(1) Signatures required.--In the case of a child under 
        the age of 16, the written application required as a 
        prerequisite to the issuance of a passport for such child shall 
        be signed by--
                    ``(A) both parents of the child if the child lives 
                with both parents;
                    ``(B) the parent of the child having primary 
                custody of the child if the child does not live with 
                both parents; or
                    ``(C) the surviving parent (or legal guardian) of 
                the child, if 1 or both parents are deceased.
            ``(2) Waiver.--The Secretary of State may waive the 
        requirements of paragraph (1)(A) if the Secretary determines 
        that circumstances do not permit obtaining the signatures of 
        both parents.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to applications for passports filed on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobeTrac Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John daCosta, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   /s/John daCosta
 John daCosta
 Chief Executive Officer
 August 10, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2024-N-0015]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the approval of a product redeeming a material threat medical countermeasure (MCM) priority review voucher. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) authorizes FDA to award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved material threat MCM product applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is required to publish notice of the issuance of material threat MCM priority review vouchers as well as the approval of products redeeming a voucher. FDA has determined that QULIPTA (atogepant) tablets, approved September 28, 2021, meets the redemption criteria.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Cathryn Lee, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-1394, email:                         *Cathryn.Lee@fda.hhs.gov.*

      ( print page 3928)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under section 565A of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-4a), FDA will report the issuance of material threat MCM priority review vouchers and the approval of products for which a voucher was redeemed. FDA has determined that the application for QULIPTA (atogepant) tablets, approved September 28, 2021, meets the redemption criteria.

                    For further information about the material threat MCM Priority Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 565A of the FD&C Act, go to                     *https://www.fda.gov/​emergency-preparedness-and-response/​mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/​21st-century-cures-act-mcm-related-cures-provisions#prv.*                     For further information about QULIPTA (atogepant) tablets go to the “Drugs@FDA” website at                     *https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/​scripts/​cder/​daf/​.*

Dated: January 17, 2024.

Lauren K. Roth,

Associate Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-01108 Filed 1-19-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
#### Clayburne Scott WILLIAMSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; C.D. Larsen, Warden, Lunenburg Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-7787.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 5, 2003.

Clayburne Scott Williamson, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*640PER CURIAM.

Clayburne Scott Williamson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Williamson v. Angelone,*No. CA-01-561 (E.D.Va. Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### Mark J. MATNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLUSIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; State of Florida, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-2279.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 4, 2003.

*203Mark J. Matney, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Mark J. Matney appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Matney v. Volusia County Sheriffs Dep’t,*No. CA-02-178-1 (W.D.Va. Oct. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*