alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Bernard F. Denoyer, certify that:

1)    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2)    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



Date: August 14, 2009

/s/ BERNARD F. DENOYER Bernard F. Denoyer Senior Vice President, Finance


---



QuickLinks
#### In re Elizabeth Marie Rushing FLOYD, Petitioner.

No. 02-7895.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.

Decided Jan. 27, 2003.

Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Elizabeth Marie Rushing Floyd petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on her motion filed on October 25, 2002, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act upon the motion. Our review of the record reveals the district court considered and denied Floyd’s § 2255 motion by order entered December 11, 2002. Accordingly, we deny as moot the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
NY PM-1 0 Attainment Determination Issues : 

ISSUE: 

EPA was required by June 30, 2001 (6 months after completion of year upon which attainment is based) 

to make an attainment determination for the New York County moderate PM-10 nonattainment area. 

The basis for this determination data with an average 3-year annual arithmetic mean below 50.4 IJ9/m3

. 

As of the end of CY-2000, most monitors in New York County showed no exceedances of this average 

for the years 1998, 1999, and 2000. However, the Madison Avenue monitoring data showed exceedance 

of this average at a level of 54.9 1Jg/m3 for calendar year 2000. 

• NY claims that due to the location of monitor (distance from curb), monitor doesn't meet federal 

reference method monitor siting criteria. Therefore, data should be invalidated for attainment 

determination purposes. 

• NY also claims that, due to the construction activity which took place during the majority of CY2000 in and around the Madison Avenue site, the monitor readings should be flagged (so as not 

to be used for attainment determination purposes). 

• EPA's position that the location of the monitor which doesn't conform to siting criteria is 

deminimis and should not have an impact on the use of data for attainment determination 

purposes. 

• EPA will support NY's claim of bad data if it can flag all days of monitoring data on which 

construction activity took place. If, after these data have been identified, the average annual 

arithmetic mean values show a maximum of 50.4 1Jg/m3

, then EPA would be willing to grant NY 

up to two extensions to show attainment by latest December 31 , 2002. 

NEXT STEPS: 

• NY should provide necessary flagged data showing all 2000 days during which construction 

activity took place. 

• NY must demonstrate that, with the exclusion of this exceptional data, the average annual 

arithmetic mean values for 2000 do not exceed 50.4 1Jg/m3

. 

• NY should clean up their PM-10 SIP- resolve any outstanding issues (i.e. contingency 

measures, adminstrative requirements, off-road inventory, etc.) 

• NY must formally request an extension of the attainment date. A report must accompany the 

extension request making a thorough case for being granted the extension. The requirements 

for being granted an attainment date extension is stated in the "PM-1 0 Attainment Determination 

Policy of 1994". Basically, the State has to submit a justification for getting the attainment date 

extension which in large part states that they have put controls in place to reduce emissions in 

the area and that's the reason that they have met the 24 hour standard, and all they need is 

more time for those controls to work fully. 

LEGALLY SUPPORTABLE BASIS FOR GRANTING STATE AN EXTENSION: 

• State would meet the requirements for an extension as stated in the Act under section 188(d)(1) 

and (2).
CERTIFICATIONS

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Phlo Corporation and Subsidiaries (the
"Company") the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James B. Hovis, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 3, 2005

                                /s/ James B. Hovis
                                -------------------------------------------
                                James B. Hovis
                                Chief Executive Officer
                                Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Gary S. Jacob, certify that:

1)    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2)    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



Date: November 16, 2009

/s/ GARY S. JACOB Gary S. Jacob Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Pedro Lichtinger, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Optimer Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and John D. Prunty,the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

1.          The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June30, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the“Quarterly Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.          The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of theperiod covered by the Quarterly Report and results of operations of the Companyfor the period covered by the Quarterly Report.

 

Dated: August 4, 2010

 
| /s/ Pedro Lichtinger                                                     |   | /s/ John D. Prunty                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Pedro Lichtinger

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) |   | John D. Prunty

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to whichit relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission andis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespectiveof any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Back to Contents

 

| **EXHIBIT 23** |
|----------------|

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report dated January 19, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of SVB Financial Services, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by referenceof said report in the Registration Statements of SVB Financial Services, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-66131, effective October 26, 1998, File No. 333-66165 effective October 27, 1998, File Nos. 333-40778 and 333-40754, effective July 3, 2000, File No. 333-76948,effective January 18, 2002 and File Nos. 333-113105 and 333-113106, effective February 26, 2004).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaMarch 29, 2005

----
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0001025 13-OCT-2015 08:43 AM
Kyle Bolstad 514 Americas Way #2894 Box Elder, SD 57719
773.837.2288 kyle@bolstad.com

February 12, 2016

Petition for Section 333 Exemption

I hereby formally request FAA authorization for Kyle Bolstad (hereafter “PETITIONER”) to operate a UAS for civil (non-governmental) purposes other than for hobby or recreation.

PETITIONER requests exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow PETITIONER to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection, including but not limited to aerial imaging.

PETITIONER requests this permission to pursue its use of UAS models with a DJI Phantom 3 (Registration #FA3CYE4PNH).

PETITIONER requests this exemption for its use of UAS both within and without the United States. PETITIONER frequently travels abroad for photographic endeavors and seeks to use UAS in accordance with all laws of foreign and domestic governmental authorities.

PETITIONER’s use of the UAS will be done in a manner which will minimize the risk to the NAS, other persons and spectators, and property. The following procedures will assist in minimizing impact: (1) UAS will be given a pre-flight inspection before each flight to examine air-worthiness, (2) UAS will not be materially altered from commercial specifications except for battery, prop, and other minor alterations, (3) UAS will not be flown over people, (4) UAS will always be flown within line of sight to operator(s) pursuant to Section 333(b)(1), (5) UAS will never reach altitudes over exceeding those allowed, (6) UAS will never exceed speeds of 50 miles per hour, (7) operator will perform a visual inspection of the NAS to locate nearby hazards before taking flight, (8) UAS will be checked for flight stability, proper connection to remote control, and proper performance at a very low altitude before reaching the NAS, and (9) spectators will be asked to stay a safe distance away from the flight path of the UAS and its landing
location. PETITIONER has a Sport Pilot Certificate (#3518242) and has over two years of experience with flying an unmanned aircraft system for personal use.

This petition will benefit the public interest. PETITIONER plans to provide previously inaccessible aerial photography of scenery and real estate for local residents.

Kyle Bolstad
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We have issued our reports  dated  January 22, 1999,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial  statements  included in the 1998  Annual  Report of SVB
Financial Services, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1998. We
hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  of  said  reports  in the
Registration  Statement of SVB Financial  Services,  Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-66131,  effective October 26, 1998 and File No. 333-66165, effective October
27, 1998).


/s/Grant Thornton LLP
   ---------------------
   Grant Thornton LLP
   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
   March 26, 1999
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov

Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:15 PM

To: Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov; Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov

Cc: james.tamm@dot.gov; Sutton, Tia; Hengst, Benjamin; Spears, Matthew

Subject: FW: HD GHG Phase 2 - RIA Combined PDF

Attachments: RIA - EPA-420-D-15-002 061815.pdf

Importance: High

Attached please find a pdf of the clean RIA. Because of the large file size, could you please confirm that you have 

received this? 

Thanks, 

Tim
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-85896) and Form S-8 (File No.33-78592, File No. 333-69913, File No. 333-79445, File No. 333-37912, File No. 333-79503, File No. 333-62078 and File No. 333-76488) of D&E Communications, Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2002, on our audits of the consolidated financialstatements of EuroTel L.L.C. which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA 

 

/s/    Nicola Di Benedetto 

 

Nicola Di Benedetto 

(Partner) 

 

Rome, March 11, 2004
Exhibit 31.1
Certifications
I, H. John Riley, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Cooper Industries, Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  August 4, 2004 /s/ H. John Riley, Jr.    H. John Riley, Jr. Chairman, President and   Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.19




Exhibit 10.19


 


Field Point Capital Management Company


One Landmark Square, Suite 1900


Stamford, CT 06901 


 


 


January 4, 2012


 


PASSUR Aerospace, Inc.


One Landmark Square, Suite 1900


Stamford, CT 06901


 


As Chairman of the Board, as well as the principal
shareholder of PASSUR Aerospace, Inc. (“PASSUR Aerospace” or the “Company”), I make the following commitment
to the Company with respect to the period from the date of this commitment through January 4, 2013.


 


Liquidity


 


I commit that if the Company at any time is
unable to meet its obligations through January 4, 2013, that I will provide the necessary continuing financial support to the Company
to ensure the Company’s ability to operate as a going concern through the period ending January 4, 2013. Such continuing
support may take the form of additional loans or advances to PASSUR Aerospace, in addition to the deferral of principal and/or
interest payments due on outstanding loans to PASSUR Aerospace as referred to above.


 


These commitments are not conditional and are
irrevocable through the period ending January 4, 2013.


 


I, G.S. Beckwith Gilbert, having the financial
wherewithal to enter into this irrevocable commitment, make the above commitments to the Company and its shareholders.


 


 


/s/ G.S. Beckwith Gilbert


G.S. Beckwith Gilbert


President
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the "Form          10Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: November 22, 2010
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman & Chief Executive Officer			 By: /s/ Lina Lei					Lina Lei					Chief Financial Officer
#### Joanne KNIGHT, John A. Malone, James Parker, Luron L. Bailey, Barbara Green, Parthenia Covington, James S. Walters, Makiea Johnson, Jacqueline W. Wilmer, Edith Mitchell, Delores Poplar, Robert Hill, Willa Webb, and Serena Waymon, Plaintiff s-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 02-5124.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 23, 2003.

ORDER

The order of dismissal and the mandate dated December 19, 2002 having been issued in error, the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1757

To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act

to extend the Act, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 14, 1996

Mr. FRIST (for himself and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill

of Rights Act to extend the Act, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Developmental Disabil5 ities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act Amendments of

6 1996’’.

7 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF ALLOTMENTS FOR STATES.

8 Section 130 of the Developmental Disabilities Assist9 ance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6030) is amended
2

•S 1757 IS

1 by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

3 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

4 PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY OF INDIVIDUAL

5 RIGHTS.

6 Section 143 of the Developmental Disabilities Assist7 ance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6043) is amended

8 by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

10 SEC. 4. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

11 UNIVERSITY AFFILIATED PROGRAMS.

12 Section 156(a) of the Developmental Disabilities As13 sistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6066(a)) is

14 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and

15 inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

16 SEC. 5. REAUTHORIZATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO

17 PROJECTS OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE.

18 Section 163(a) of the Developmental Disabilities As19 sistance and Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6083(a)) is

20 amended by striking ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 and 1996’’ and

21 inserting ‘‘the fiscal years 1995 through 1999’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 21.1


                       LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT

Aviation Sales Finance Company (wholly-owned subsidiary)

Aviation Sales Company FSC, Ltd. (wholly-owned subsidiary)

Aviation Sales Maintenance, Repair & Overhaul Company ("ASMRO") (wholly-owned
subsidiary)

         Triad International Maintenance Corporation ("TIMCO") (wholly-owned
         subsidiary of ASMRO)

                  Timco Engineered Systems, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of
                  TIMCO)

         TIMCO Engine Center, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of ASMRO)

         Aerocell Structures, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of ASMRO)

         Caribe Aviation, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of ASMRO)

                  Aircraft Interior Design, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of
                  Caribe Aviation, Inc.)

         Whitehall Corporation ("Whitehall") (wholly-owned subsidiary of ASMRO)

                  Hydroscience, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of Whitehall)

Aviation Sales Property Management Corp. ("ASPM") (wholly-owned subsidiary)

AVSRE, L.P. (a limited partnership of which ASPM is the sole general partner and
Whitehall is the sole limited partner)

Aviation Sales Distribution Services Company (wholly-owned subsidiary)

AVS/M-1, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary)

         AVS/M-2, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of AVS/M-1, Inc.)

         AVS/M-3, Inc. (wholly-owned subsidiary of AVS/M-1, Inc.)