alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.




This
16th day
of August, 2010.




/s/ Stephen D.
      BarnhillStephen D. Barnhill,
      M.D.
                    Chief Executive
      Officer




/s/
      Thomas L. GallagherThomas L.
      Gallagher
                      Principal Financial
      Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION I, Jack Braverman, certify that:1.
I have reviewed this year end report on Form 10-K of Trimol Group,
 Inc.2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
 statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
 make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
 statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
 this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial
 information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
 the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
 registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this report;4.
The registrants other certifying officers and I are
responsible for
 establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
 in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant, and we have:d.
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
 material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
 subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
 particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;e.
evaluated the effectiveness of this registrants disclosure
controls
 and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
 report (the Evaluation Date); andf.
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
 the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
 Date;5.
The registrants other certifying officers and I have
disclosed,
 based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the
 registrants board of directors:c.
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
 controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
 process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
 registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andd.
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other
 employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls;
 and6.
The registrants other certifying offers and I have indicated
in this
 report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or
 in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
 to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions
 with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  April 15,
 2009
/s/ Jack
 BravermanJack
 BravermanChief
 Financial Officer - 40 -
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT,FINANCE**

**CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

**FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDEDMARCH 31, 2007**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I am the Vice President, Finance of CallistoPharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). I amdelivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I herebycertify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theForm 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
| *Date: May 21, 2007* |                      |     |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|----------|
|                      |                      |     |
|                      | */s/ Bernard F. Denoyer*  | * * |
|                      | *Bernard F. Denoyer*      | * * |
|                      | *Vice President, Finance* | * * |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01489]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Notice of Public Meetings of the New Mexico Advisory Committee; 
Update

AGENCY: Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice; update webinar registration links.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the 
Federal Register of Thursday, December 7, 2023, concerning various 
meetings of the New Mexico Advisory Committee. The document contained 
outdated registrations links. These are the updated webinar 
registration links as follows:

February 6
    https://www.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_DTG2mXQ_QWmzrsKFznMWlw
March 5
    https://www.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_zL_DChg8TrKVMakhraA9pA
March 28
    https://www.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_sN2fpf9PTM2osHMy2cITXg

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brooke Peery, (202) 701-1376, 
[email protected].
    In the Federal Register of Friday, December 7, 2023, in FR Doc. 
2023-28559, on page 89363, third column and page 89364, first and 
second columns, all times remain the same 12:00 p.m.-1:30 p.m. Mountain 
Time.

    Dated: January 22, 2024.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2024-01489 Filed 1-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, S. Bradford Antle, the ChiefExecutive Officer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”), has executedthis certification in connection with the filing with the Securities andExchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 24, 2005 (the “Report”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| November 2, 2005 | SI INTERNATIONAL, INC.                |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  |                                  |
|                  |                                  |
|                  | /s/ S. BRADFORD ANTLE                 |   |
|                  | S. Bradford Antle                     |
|                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Thomas E. Dunn, the Chief FinancialOfficer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”), has executed thiscertification in connection with the filing with the Securities and ExchangeCommission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 24, 2005 (the “Report”). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| November 2, 2005 | SI INTERNATIONAL, INC.                |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  |                                  |
|                  |                                  |
|                  | /s/ THOMAS E. DUNN                    |   |
|                  | Thomas E. Dunn                        |
|                  | Executive Vice President,             |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

2

----
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: January 29, 2015 105917 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBERT R. KLEIN III,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: November 21, 2014

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Abbie Goldbas, Utica, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Mark D. Suben, District Attorney, Cortland (Kenneth H.

Tyler of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Clark, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Cortland

County (Campbell, J.), rendered November 15, 2012, convicting

defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted

burglary in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant

pleaded guilty to attempted burglary in the third degree and

waived his right to appeal. Under the terms of the plea

agreement, he was to be sentenced as a second felony offender to

11⁄2 to 3 years in prison. He was advised that, if he did not

appear for sentencing and lacked a legitimate excuse for his

absence, he could be sentenced in absentia to 2 to 4 years in

prison. County Court adjourned sentencing twice. Thereafter,

defense counsel made two more requests for adjournments, the
-2- 105917 

first of which was based on defendant's need to resolve pending

legal matters and the second of which was based on him having

left Cortland County for work and having no ability to return. 

County Court denied those requests and, when defendant did not

appear, sentenced him in absentia to 2 to 4 years in prison. 

Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant argues that County Court abused its

discretion in sentencing him in absentia to an enhanced sentence,

a claim that survives defendant's appeal waiver (see People v

Brown, 101 AD3d 1267, 1268 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 1014 [2013],

cert denied US , 134 S Ct 938 [2014]; People v Hall, 78

AD3d 1328, 1328 [2010]). Turning to the merits, defendant waived

his right to be present at sentencing when he failed to appear,

despite having been warned of the potential consequences of doing

so (see People v Brown, 101 AD3d at 1268; People v Haran, 72 AD3d

1289, 1289-1290 [2010]). County Court then considered the

proffered reason for defendant's absence and found it to be

unpersuasive. Under the circumstances of this case, we cannot

say that County Court abused its discretion by sentencing

defendant in absentia to an enhanced sentence (see People v

Brown, 101 AD3d at 1268; People v Haran, 72 AD3d at 1289-1290;

People v Torra, 8 AD3d 751, 751-752 [2004]).

McCarthy, J.P., Garry, Lynch and Devine, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
The Board of Directors
ARV Assisted Living, Inc.:
 
     We consent to the use of our audit reports incorporated herein by reference
to the financial statements of ARV Assisted Living, Inc. as of March 31, 1996
and 1995, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31,
1996, American Retirement Villas Properties II and San Gabriel Retirement Villa,
dba Villa Colima both as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995 and SynCare, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of June 30, 1996 and for the year then ended and to the
reference to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.
 
                                          KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Orange County, California
November 15, 1996
##### 



Exhibit 99.1  Appendix 3E
Daily share buy-back notice
 Rule 3.8A
 Appendix 3E
 Daily share buy-back notice
(except minimum holding buy-back and
selective buy-back)
 Information and documents given to ASX become ASXs property and may be made public.
   
  
  Information about buy-back
 1
    
    Type of buy-back
    
    On-market2
    
    Date Appendix 3C was given to ASX
    
    15 August 2007
 Total of all shares bought back, or in relation to which
acceptances have been received, before, and on, previous day
 Before previous day
    
    
    Previous day
 3
    
    Number of shares bought back or if buy-back is an equal access scheme, in relation to which acceptances have been received
    
    
    13,374,676 CUFS
    
    
    310,000 CUFS4
    
    Total consideration paid or payable for the shares
    
    
    $A95,418,596.89
    
    
    $A1,954,147.00
 + See chapter 19 for defined terms.30/9/2001
    
    Appendix 3E Page 1




---



##### 



Appendix 3E
Daily share buy-back notice
 Before previous day
    
    
    Previous day5
    
    If buy-back is an on-market buy-back
    
    
    highest price paid:
    $A7.63

date: 
    20 September 2007

lowest price paid:
    $A6.11

date:
    23 November 2007
    
    
    highest price paid:
    $A6.37

lowest price paid:
    $A6.25

highest price allowed under rule 7.33:
    $6.6108
 Participation by directors6
    
    Deleted 30/9/2001.How many shares may still be bought back?7
    
    If the company has disclosed an intention to buy back a maximum number of
    shares - the remaining number of shares to be bought back
    
    33,084,899 CUFS
 Compliance statement
 1.
    
    The company is in compliance with all Corporations Act requirements relevant to this buy-back.2.
    
    There is no information that the listing rules require to be disclosed that has not already been
    disclosed, or is not contained in, or attached to, this form.
 Sign here:
    
    /s/ Russell L Chenu
    
    Date:
    
    28 November 2007(Director)Print name:
    
    Russell L Chenu
  + See chapter 19 for defined terms.Appendix 3E Page 2
    
    30/9/2001
Circuit Court for Prince George’s County

Case No. CAE-13-23282 Argued: September 10, 2014 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND Misc. Docket AG No. 33 September Term, 2013

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

OF MARYLAND

v. THOMAS WESLEY FELDER, II

Harrell Battaglia Greene Adkins McDonald Watts Raker, Irma S. (Retired, specially assigned) JJ.

PER CURIAM ORDER

Filed: September 11, 2014ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * In the

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * Court of Appeals

v. * of Maryland * Misc. Docket AG No. 33 THOMAS WESLEY FELDER, II * September Term, 2013
PER CURIAM ORDER For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 11th day September, 2014, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Thomas Wesley Felder, II, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Thomas Wesley Felder, II from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-761(b), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Thomas Wesley Felder, II.

/s/ Glenn T. Harrell Senior Judge
No. 07-17-00329-CV

In the Interest of C.S., G.M.S., J.C.S., 

J.S., and R.S., Children

§

§

§

§

From the 287th District Court 

 of Parmer County

September 26, 2017

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 26, 2017, it is ordered, 

adjudged and decreed that this appeal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis, no costs beyond those that 

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by In Veritas Medical
Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.










/s/
Martin E. Thorp


_______________________________


Martin E.
Thorp


Chief
Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the "Form          10Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: August 23, 2010
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman & Chief Executive Officer			 By: /s/ Lina Lei					Lina Lei					Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
    OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
    Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
    2002
    Form 10-Q
    May 6, 2008Date

/s/  Courtney
    A. BrowerCourtney
    A. BrowerFinancial Reporting ManagerGrubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC,
    the Manager of NNN 2002 Value Fund, LLC(principal accounting officer)   Form 10-Q
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION * IN THE

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF

RICHARD MARK PAVLICK * COURT OF APPEALS

TO THE BAR OF MARYLAND

* OF MARYLAND

* Misc. Docket AG No. 39

* September Term, 20 2 1

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Verified P etition of Richard Mark Pavlick for

Reinstatement to the Maryland Bar and Bar Counsel’s Consent to Petition for

Reinstatement

, filed in the above

- captioned case , it is th is 12th day of January

, 20 2 2

,

ORDERED

, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Petition be, and the

same hereby is, GRANTED ; and it is further

ORDERED, that Richard Mark Pavlick is reinstated as a member of the Bar of

Maryland subject to the terms and conditions of the Monitor Agreement ; and it is further

ORDERED , that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name Richard Mark

Pavlick upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that

fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in

this St ate.

/s/ Joseph M. Getty

Chief Judge
II

Calendar No. 544

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1834

[Report No. 104–338]

To reauthorize the Indian Environmental General Assistance Program Act

of 1992, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 4, 1996

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. SIMON, and Mr. DOMENICI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

JULY 29, 1996

Reported by Mr. MCCAIN, without amendment

A BILL

To reauthorize the Indian Environmental General Assistance

Program Act of 1992, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION.

4 Section 502(h) of the Indian Environmental General

5 Assistance Program Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 4368b(h)) is
2

•S 1834 RS

1 amended by striking ‘‘$15,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘such

2 sums as may be necessary’’.

Calendar No. 544

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1834

[Report No. 104–338]

A BILL

To reauthorize the Indian Environmental General

purposes.Assistance Program Act of 1992, and for other

JULY 29, 1996

Reported without amendment
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[House]
[Page H6257]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

                VOICE OF TEXAS: PAM FROM LIBERTY, TEXAS

  (Mr. POE of Texas asked and was given permission to address the House 
for 1 minute.)
  Mr. POE of Texas. Mr. Speaker, I have heard from many Texas business 
owners who built their own business without government help. Here's 
what Pam from Liberty, Texas, has to say:

       We are college educated, taxpaying citizens who have a 
     lifetime of hard work under our belts. We have stayed up 
     nights trying to figure out how we were going to pay our 
     taxes, insurance, employees, and bank notes. We started from 
     scratch, owning convenience stores, car washes, mini storage 
     businesses, a clothing business, and also operated/owned two 
     small-town movie theaters that were built by my husband's 
     grandparents and parents. The latest is a real estate 
     business.
       There's not much that anyone can tell us about the 
     sacrifices that have to be made when you start up your own 
     business. We have done it all, including working full-time 
     jobs for someone else to make ends meet. No government agency 
     has ever helped us with one thing, but the government 
     certainly has made our work harder and more expensive to run/
     operate our businesses.

  Mr. Speaker, people--not the government--make America's businesses 
successful.
  And that's just the way it is.

                          ____________________
```