alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1634

To amend the resolution establishing the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Memorial

Commission to extend the service of certain members.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 21, 1996

Mr. LEVIN (for himself, Mr. DOLE, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. INOUYE, and Mr.

D’AMATO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

A BILL

To amend the resolution establishing the Franklin Delano

Roosevelt Memorial Commission to extend the service

of certain members.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That the first section of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to estab4 lish a commission to formulate plans for a memorial to

5 Franklin Delano Roosevelt’’, approved August 11, 1955

6 (69 Stat. 694) is amended by adding at the end thereof

7 the following: ‘‘A Commissioner who ceases to be a Mem8 ber of the Senate or the House of Representatives may,

9 with the approval of the appointing authority, continue to
2

S 1634 IS

1 serve as a Commissioner for a period of up to one year

2 after he or she ceases to be a Member of the Senate or

3 the House of Representatives.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             243
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    105,586
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,546
<PP&E>                                          36,421
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 268,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,981
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           146
<OTHER-SE>                                     180,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   268,583
<SALES>                                        250,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               287,311
<CGS>                                          132,296
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  263,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                29,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 874
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,089
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,873
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,216
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,216
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
        

</TABLE>
#### Betty Lou BEETS, Petitioner-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. James A. COLLINS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellant Cross-Appellee.

No. 91-4606.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1993.

William C. Zapalac, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dan Morales, Atty. Gen., Austin, TX, for respondent-appellant, cross-appellee.

Joe Margulies, Robert L. MeGlasson, TX Resource Center, Austin, TX, for petitioner-appellee, cross-appellant.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Thursday, February 26, 2015

No. 04-14-00041-CR

Kyle Miller,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR5502

Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed a “Motion for Reconsideration in Granting Request for Oral Arguments,” 

urging that we reconsider our decision to submit this appeal on briefs and instead have oral 

argument. We DENY the motion. 

Appellant also requests an opportunity to file a supplemental brief. Appellant may file a 

supplemental brief on or before March 30, 2015. No extensions will be granted. Any 

supplemental brief filed by appellant may not raise additional issues or points of error, but must 

only provide additional legal support for issues or points of error raised in appellant’s original 

brief. If appellant files a supplemental brief, appellee may file a response twenty days after the 

date appellant’s supplemental brief is filed. 

PER CURIAM

ATTEST TO: ___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, 

 Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Schedule 14A and Schedule
13E-4/A-5 of our report dated August 27, 1996 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Comprehensive Care Corporation and subsidiaries included
in Comprehensive Care Corporation's Annual Report (Form 10-K), for the year
ended May 31, 1996, as amended, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.


                                            /s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Orange County, California
November 4, 1996
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1761 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1761

To eliminate taxpayer subsidies for recreational shooting programs, and 
to prevent the transfer of federally-owned weapons, ammunition, funds, 
and other property to a private Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle 
                     Practice and Firearms Safety.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 1996

 Mr. Lautenberg (for himself and Mr. Bumpers) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To eliminate taxpayer subsidies for recreational shooting programs, and 
to prevent the transfer of federally-owned weapons, ammunition, funds, 
and other property to a private Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle 
                     Practice and Firearms Safety.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Self Financing Civilian Marksmanship 
Program Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. PRIVATE SHOOTING COMPETITIONS AND FIREARM SAFETY PROGRAMS.

    Nothing in this Act prohibits any private person from establishing 
a privately financed program to support shooting competitions or 
firearms safety programs.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF CHARTER LAW FOR THE CORPORATION FOR THE PROMOTION OF 
              RIFLE PRACTICE AND SAFETY.

    (a) Repeal of Charter.--The Corporation for the Promotion of Rifle 
Practice and Firearms Safety Act (title XVI of Public Law 104-106; 110 
Stat. 515; 36 U.S.C. 5501 et seq.), except for section 1624 of such Act 
(110 Stat. 522), is repealed.
    (b) Related Repeals.--Section 1624 of such Act (110 Stat. 522) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (a), by 
        striking out ``and 4311'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``4311, 
        4312, and 4313'';
            (2) by striking out subsection (b); and
            (3) in subsection (c), by striking out ``on the earlier 
        of--'' and all that follows and inserting in lieu thereof ``on 
        October 1, 1996.''.
                                 <all>
```
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1827/2006

of 12 December 2006         

fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2771/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in eggs (1), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (2), and in particular Article 5(4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2783/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common system of trade for ovalbumin and lactalbumin (3), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is hereby replaced by the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 13 December 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 49. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 679/2006 (OJ L 119, 4.5.2006, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 77. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 679/2006.

(3)OJ L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 104. Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2916/95 (OJ L 305, 19.12.1995, p. 49).

(4)OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1725/2006 (OJ L 324, 23.11.2006, p. 5).

----

ANNEX

to the Commission Regulation of 12 December 2006 fixing representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95

                     ‘ANNEX I

----

(1)  Origin of imports:

----
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: November 5, 2010





/s/ DAVID S. SMITHDavid S. Smith

President and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. The foregoing certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
```

[Federal Register: June 28, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 124)]
[Notices]               
[Page 37780]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr28jn11-52]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that an orientation and a 
planning meeting of the Connecticut State Advisory Committee will 
convene at 10:30 a.m. on Wednesday, July 20, 2011, at the University of 
Connecticut, School of Law, Faculty Lounge, 55 Elizabeth Street, 
Hartford, CT 06105. The purpose of the orientation meeting is to review 
the rules of operation for this Federal advisory committee with the 
newly appointed committee members; the purpose of the planning meeting 
is to plan the committee's future activities.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, August 22, 
2011. The address is Eastern Regional Office, 624 9th Street, NW., 
Suite 740, Washington, DC 20425. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments, or who desire additional information should contact the 
Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533 or by e-mail to: ero@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend these meetings and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meetings.
    Records generated from these meetings may be inspected and 
reproduced at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, 
both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of 
this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the 
above e-mail or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the rules and 
regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC on June 23, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-16114 Filed 6-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
EXHIBIT
      99.1





**Report
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      have reviewed the accompanying consolidated financial statements of microHelix,
      Inc. (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and for the three months then
      ended. These interim consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
      of
      the Company's management.





We
      conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the Public
      Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim
      consolidated financial statements consists principally of applying analytical
      procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
      accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
      in
      accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which
      is
      the expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated financial statements
      taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.





Based
      on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be
      made to the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements for them
      to
      be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
      States of America.





As
      indicated in Note 1, certain conditions indicate that the Company may be unable
      to continue as a going concern. The accompanying interim financial information
      does not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
      uncertainty.





/s/
      Stonefield Josephson, Inc.


February
      7, 2005








8
#### UNIVERSITY PATENTS, (now known as Competitive Technologies, Inc.) and PE Corporation (N.Y.) (doing business as Applied Biosystems), Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BIOSEARCH, INC. and Ronald Cook, Defendants-Appellees, and New Brunswick Scientific Co., Inc., Defendant.

No. 02-1285.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

DECIDED: Jan. 24, 2003.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

The parties to this appeal inform the court that they have reached a settlement *551and have entered into a confidential settlement agreement. Because the parties have entered into an agreement settling their dispute, this appeal is now moot.

The parties submit a stipulation requesting the court to remand this case to the district court for dismissal with prejudice pursuant to the settlement agreement, the terms of which have not been furnished to the court. The case is remanded pursuant to *U.S. Bancorp. Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership,*513 U.S. 18, 29, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994), and the district court is instructed to consider the parties’ request for disposition and to take such further action as the district court, in its discretion, shall deem proper.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is terminated as moot.

(2) The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of Lawson Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert G. Barbieri, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/ROBERT G. BARBIERIRobert G. Barbieri Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | October 9, 2003                                                                             

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lawson Software, Inc. and will be retained by Lawson Software, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000809398
<NAME> FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           129,236
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      31,412
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    8,659
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 180,082
<CASH>                                          47,431
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,063
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                146,094
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                136,047
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,063
<PREMIUMS>                                     285,552
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             12,403
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               5,213
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 106,677
<BENEFITS>                                      19,031
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           381,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,828
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,632
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (813)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .53
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 29, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 29, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0510. WASEEM DAKER v. SHERRY BLAND, CLERK, TATTNALL COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017NH2