alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

# ac1szo13

Mr. Scott Davis Chief, Air Planning Branch U.S. EPA, Region 4 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 

### Environmental Protection Division• Air Protection Branch 4244 International Parkway• Suite 120• Atlanta • Georgia 30354 404/363-7000 • Fax: 404/363-7100 Judson H. Turner, Director

RE: Maintenance Plan and Redesignation Requestfor the Rome, Georgia (Floyd County), Annual PM2.s NonattainmentArea Dear Mr. Davis: On June 21, 2012, the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) submitted for approval and incorporation a proposed revision to Georgia's State Implementation Plan (SIP) to include a plan, consistentwith §175A ofthe Clean AirAct, to provide for maintenance ofthe 1997Annual PM2 .5 National AmbientAir Quality Standard (NAAQS) in the Rome-Floyd County area. The submittal also served as a request that the Rome NonattainmentArea be redesignated as an area attaining the 1997Annual PM2.s NAAQS. This letter serves as a submittal ofadditional information to support the previously submitted SIP revision forthe Rome area. On-road mobile emissions modeling for the plan was performed using EPA's MOtorVehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES 201Oa). All input data files for the MOVES modeling used to supportthe plan was previously submitted as well as a summary ofthe outputfiles. Outputfiles are not typically submitted due to the fact that the results can be easily replicated with the submitted inputfiles and that the output files are not in a format that can submitted as a paper copy as required by Federal regulations regarding SIP submittals. In addition, the raw output files include far more information than is necessary to support the SIP revision. EPD is providing an electronic copy ofthe MOVES outputfiles with this submission in an effort to help facilitate the review ofthis SIP revision. We lookforward to your review and approval ofthis revision. Should you oryour staff have any questions, please feel free to contact JimmyJohnston at (404) 363-7014. Sincerely,



### /) /J 

# L,;_**~~1//-** 

# r--- )'ames P. Johnston, P.E.

Program Manager, Planning and Support Program Georgia EPD, Air Protection Branch JJ:JK Enclosure:

- MOVES output files (one CD)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Function, and Rehabilitation Sciences Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         March 5, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Magnus A. Azuine, Ph.D., Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, National Institute of Child Health & Human Development, NIH, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2125C, Bethesda, MD 20817, (301) 480-4645,                         *magnus.azuine@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 12, 2024. 

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-00899 Filed 1-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We have issued our report dated August 6, (except for Note J, as to which the
date is September 30, 1996) accompanying the financial statements of Inland
Casino Corporation appearing in the fiscal 1996 Annual Report of the Company to
its shareholders included in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended June 30, 1996, which are incorporated by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (1994 Stock Option Plan). We consent to the incorporated 
by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the aforementioned 
report.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Los Angeles, California
January 13, 1997
|   | 1. | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November      15, 2010 |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                    |   |   |
| /s/ Patricia J. Brown                   |   |   |
| Patricia      J. Brown                  |   |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer            |   |   |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                         -------------------------------



The Board of Directors
TIMCO Aviation Services, Inc. and subsidiaries:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement numbers
333-07021 on Form S-8 and 333-51479-01 on Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on
Form S-8 to Form S-4 of TIMCO Aviation Services, Inc. and subsidiaries of our
report dated March 26, 2004, except for note 15, which is as of April 8, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of TIMCO Aviation Services, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and comprehensive income (loss)
and cash flows and financial statement schedule of valuation and qualifying
accounts for the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2003
annual report on Form 10-K of TIMCO Aviation Services, Inc. and subsidiaries.


                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
April 15, 2004
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cal-Bay International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




                              /s/Robert  Thompson
                              -------------------------
                              Chief  Executive  Officer
                              November  6,  2002
#### Linda CHEN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 02-3237.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 13, 2003.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s unopposed motion to remand this case to the Board for further proceedings,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:26 PM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: Times for (1) Legal Discussion and (2) RIA Briefing 

Thanks Bob! I think we are set on meetings. If we get through all the legal issues on Monday’s 

call, we can go ahead and cancel Thursday’s (or reappropriate it for another topic). 

 

It’s always good to work with you – I appreciate your willingness to work with us. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

From: Wayland, Robertj [mailto:Wayland.Robertj@epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:16 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Subject: RE: Times for (1) Legal Discussion and (2) RIA Briefing 

I think all of the requested meetings have been scheduled ... if I missed anything, please let me 

know. BTW, it was great to see you again yesterday, I always enjoy working with you because you 

make the whole process tolerable ... almost fun! 

thanx! 

bob 

Robert J. Wayland, Ph.D. 

Leader, Energy Strategies Group 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Mail Code D243-01 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 

Office: (919) 541-1045 

Cell: (919) 306-2290 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

Email: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

************************************* 

 DRAFT/Deliberative Document - FOIA Exempt 

************************************* 
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 11:58 AM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Cc: Elman, Barry 

Subject: Times for (1) Legal Discussion and (2) RIA Briefing 

Hi Bob, 

Here are times that work on our end for the legal issues: 

- Mon, 4/14: 2-3:30, 4:30-6 

- Tue, 4/15: 10-11:30, 4:30-6 

- Thu, 4/17: 11-noon 

And for a briefing on the RIA: 

- Tue, 4/15: 4:30-6 (listed above) 

- Wed, 4/16: 10-11, 1-2, 2:30-3:30 

Regards, 

Cortney
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cal Bay International, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger E. Pawson, Chief
Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof) and Chief Financial Officer
(or equivalent thereof) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                               /s/ Roger E. Pawson
                              -------------------------
                              Roger E. Pawson
                              Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              November 18, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the quarterly report of First National Energy Corporation (the "Registrant"), on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date, I, Peter Wanner, as Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







FIRST NATIONAL ENERGY CORPORATIONDated: June  9, 2011
By:
/s/ Peter WannerPeter Wanner

Chief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this statement required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OXIDES OF SULFUR ANNUAL EMISSION REPORTCompany Name Holcim (US) Inc.Site Name Devils Slide PlantCompany ID - 2001Site ID - 10007NOTE: Be aware that this report uses different methods of calculating emissions than are required forthe 2006 Emissions Inventory.Amount Units/YrDesignRate1199817342421-BF130500623No16758Natural Gas6696Hrs/yearThis form is to be used by sources that have emitted 100 tons or more of SOxin any calendar year after 1999, and that arenot subjectto acid rain continuous monitoringreporting requirements (40CFR Part 75). Row 1 in the following table(s) contains historical inventorydata for the listed component. Row 2 is used to calculate the 2006process emissions using the same method that was used in the historical data. The inputs required arein green font. To insert the new data you type overthe top of the olddata. Row 3 (shaded) is used to show and calculateany changes in the method of calculation from 1998to 2006 (i.g. emission factors, % of sulfur, heating value, controls,breakdowns, estimation methods). If the current method of calculating the SOxemissions does not work with the equation providedin row 3, the calculation should beprovided in the row 4. Rows 3 and 4 should have thesame calculations as contained in the 2006 Emission Inventory.Year DAQ IDPt SourceID SCCDescription ofProcessNSPS(Yes/No)AssociatedStack IDRaw Material orFuel usedThroughput Generating EmKiln FuelPage 1Holcim1199817342421-BF130500623No16758Natural Gas6696Hrs/year22006 (using 1998 method ofcalculation)17342 421-BF1 30500623 No 16758 Natural Gas7783Hrs/year32006 (if method of calculationis different from 1998)17342 421-BF1 30500623 No 16758 Natural Gas Hrs/yearFormula for calculating emissions1998 Emissions = (Emission Factor x Hours of Operation) / 2000Kiln FuelKiln Fuel42006 CalculationsNOTE: In 1998 the major fuel used was coal with 17% of the fuel Natural Gas.Kiln FuelPage 1HolcimOXIDES OF SULFUR ANNUAL EMISSION REPORTCompany Name HolcimSite Name Devils Slide PlantSecondary ControlUnits1059btu/cfn/a0n/a00.00245.07Throughput Generating EmissionsIf Throughput is a Fuel Primary ControlControlEfficiency(%)Emissions(tons/yr)Name ofPrimary ControlControlCode (SeeList)Name ofSecondaryControlControl Code (SeeList)HeatingValue Units%SulfurHow SulfurContent iscalculated%AshPage 2Holcim1059btu/cfn/a0n/a00.00245.071027 btu/cf n/a 0 n/a0 0 451.4141027btu/cf n/a 0 n/a0 0Page 2Holcim04Stack Test 4/199873.2lbs/hrEstimate MethodEmissionFactorEmissionsfromBreakdown(tons/year)EstimateCodeUnitsPage 3Holcim04Stack Test 4/199873.2lbs/hr04 Stack Test 10/14/02 116 lbs/hr04lbs/hrComponentCurrentEmissionsAdjustedEmissionsKiln (Natural Gas) 451.414 451.414Mobile 4.248 4.248TOTAL 455.662 455.662Page 3HolcimEQUIPMENT NOT RUN IN 1998 THAT EMITS SOx2005 SOxTons/yearDAQ IDPointSource ID Description of Process How sulfur content was calculatedPage 4HolcimPage 5HolcimPage 6Holcim
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

s0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

138614

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138614 COA: 286819 Genesee CC: 96-054571-FC WILLARD LEVI ADAMSON, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 25, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jesus BARRAZA-MONJE, a.k.a. Jesus Barraza, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-10108.

D.C. No. CR-01-00103-RCC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 2002.

Decided Feb. 5, 2003.

Before B. FLETCHER, R. ARNOLD,* and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

The Honorable Richard S. Arnold, Senior Judge for the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM**

Appellant Jesus Barraza-Monje (“Bar-raza”) appeals his conviction for unlawful re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

“In a criminal prosecution under § 1826, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment requires a meaningful opportunity for judicial review of the underlying deportation.” *United States v. Velasco-Medina,*305 F.3d 839, 847 (9th Cir.2002) (citation omitted). However, a deportation order may be challenged only if the alien demonstrates that available administrative remedies have been exhausted. *See id.*

Barraza was deported twice, once in 1994, a second time in 1997. In the 1997 deportation proceedings he could have challenged the 1994 deportation order, since the 1997 deportation depended on the validity of the 1994 deportation. Bar-raza also had a right to appeal the 1997 deportation and did not. Had he done so, he could have argued that the 1994 appeal was timely and that the 1994 deportation was invalid. *See United States v. Hinojo-sar-Perez,*206 F.3d 832, 836 (9th Cir.2000). His failure to do so defeats his ability to challenge either deportation. *See id.*

Barraza claims he was never free from official restraint from the time he crossed the border so that he never technically entered the United States. We disagree. A reasonable juror could have concluded that Barraza was not under constant observation by governmental authorities from the moment he set foot in this country until the moment of his arrest. *See United States v. Hemandez-Herrera,*273 F.3d 1213, 1219 (9th Cir.2001).

*834We have considered Barraza’s other assignments of error and find none persuasive.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:2010-NM-073-AD (FAA-2010-0391)
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1543

To clarify the treatment of Nebraska impact aid payments.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26, 1996

Mr. KERREY introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered,

read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To clarify the treatment of Nebraska impact aid payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF IMPACT AID PAYMENTS.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Education shall

5 treat any State as having met the requirements of section

6 5(d)(2)(A) of Public Law 81–874 for fiscal year 1991, and

7 as not having met those requirements for each of the fiscal

8 years 1992, 1993, and 1994, if—

9 (1) its program of State aid was not certified

10 by the Secretary under section 5(d)(2)(C)(i) of Pub11 lic Law 81–874 for any fiscal year before fiscal year

12 1991;
2

S 1543 CPS

1 (2) the State submitted timely notice under

2 that section of its intention to seek that certification;

3 (3) the Secretary determined that the State did

4 not meet the requirements of section 5(d)(2)(A) of

5 Public Law 81–874 for fiscal year 1991; and

6 (4) it has made a payment to each local edu7 cational agency in the State, other than any local

8 educational agency that received a payment for fiscal

9 year 1991 under section 3(d)(2)(B) of Public Law

10 81–874, whose State aid it reduced for that fiscal

11 year, in the full amount of that reduction.

12 (b) REPAYMENT NOT REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding

13 any other provision of law, any local educational agency

14 in such a State that received funds under section

15 3(d)(2)(B) of Public Law 81–874 for fiscal year 1991

16 shall not, by virtue of subsection (a), be required to repay

17 those funds to the Secretary.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sports Information & Publishing Corp.
("the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
Bernard Turner, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

            (1) the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Bernard Turner
----------------------------
Bernard Turner
Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 23, 2004