alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section
                     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Adam Mauerberger, President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Wine
Agencies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Adam Mauerberger
-----------------------------
Adam Mauerberger
President and Principal Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5098 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5098

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the notification to 
Congress of the hospitalization of combat-wounded members of the Armed 
                                Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2018

 Mr. Swalwell of California (for himself and Ms. Stefanik) introduced 
   the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the notification to 
Congress of the hospitalization of combat-wounded members of the Armed 
                                Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Wounded in Action 
Notification Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT TO THE NOTIFICATION TO OF HOSPITALIZATION OF 
              COMBAT-WOUNDED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 1074l(a) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``admitted to a military treatment facility within the United 
States'' and inserting ``admitted to any military treatment facility''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Cal Bay International, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger E. Pawson, Chief
Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof) and Chief Financial Officer
(or equivalent thereof) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                               /s/ Roger E. Pawson
                              -------------------------
                              Roger E. Pawson
                              Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              September 8, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) BALANCE
SHEET & STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR PERIOD ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 1996. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE PERIOD (QUARTERLY) ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              MAR-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,189,705
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,711,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,174,539
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,379,833
<PP&E>                                       6,325,539
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,990,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,143,216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,852,248
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,041,064
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,555,142)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,143,216
<SALES>                                      2,854,686
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,854,686
<CGS>                                        2,804,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,804,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               955,960
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,454
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (984,802)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (984,802)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (984,802)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bill Winfield CONARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4198.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 22, 2002.

Decided Jan. 27, 2003.

Louis H. Lang, Callison, Tighe & Robinson, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Office of the United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Bill Winfield Conard was convicted of armed bank robbery (Count 1), under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d) & (e) (2000), using and carrying a firearm in relation to a crime of violence (Count 2), under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000), and possession of a firearm by a felon having three previous violent felonies (Count 3), under 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g), 924(e) (2000). Conard received a life sentence for Count 1, a five-year consecutive sentence for Count 2, and a fifteen-year concurrent sentence for Count 3.

On appeal, Conard’s counsel has filed a brief under *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), alleging that there are no meritorious claims on appeal but raising the following issues, whether the district court: (1) erred by denying Conard’s motion to suppress evidence found in the car; (2) erred by denying Conard’s motion for acquittal on the grounds of insufficient evidence; and (3) erred by finding that Conard was subject to a mandatory life sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c)(1) (2000). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

First, the district court properly denied Conard’s motion to suppress the search of the vehicle because as a mere passenger, he lacked a legitimate expectation of privacy in the areas of the vehicle that were searched. *Rakas v. Illinois,*439 U.S. 128, 148-49, 99 S.Ct. 421, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978). Second, there was ample evidence to support Conard’s convictions. *Glasser v. United States,*315 U.S. 60, 80, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942). Finally, the district court properly determined that Co-nard was subject to a mandatory life sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c), which is not affected by the Supreme Court’s opinion in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. *164466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

We have examined the entire record in this case, in accordance with the requirements of *Anders,*including the claims raised in Conard’s pro se supplemental brief, and find no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
In The Matter Of: 

AIRCAL, INC. 

Respondent 

SERVED: NOVEMBER 10, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2015-1324 

Case No. 2014WP910129 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On October 8, 2015, an Order Reassigning Proceeding was filed, which reassigned this 

proceeding to the undersigned. 

On October 15,2015, the FAA filed the Complainant's Renewed Motion to Deem 

Allegations Admitted and to Dismiss Appeal ("Renewed Motion"). 

On November 5, 2015, the Respondent, Aircal Inc., filed a Withdrawal of Appeal, stating 

that the parties have "entered into a mutually agreeable Settlement Agreement therefore this 

Appeal is hereby withdrawn." 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Based on the parties' settlement, the FAA's Renewed Motion is deemed moot. .. ,• t ~ •• f'l ~1 

2. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for a Hearing, 

·and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
Docket No. FAA-2015-1324 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

. . , . 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Mr. David F. Shayne 

Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave., S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

Mr. Leonardo Concepcion, President 

Aircal, Inc. 

Respondent 

6411 West Imperial Highway 

Los Angeles, CA 90045 

FAX: 503-678-3374 

Judge J .E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Mr. Kevin Sullivan 

Respondent's Representative 

TEL: 714-844-2520 

MOBILE: 714-337-6912 

EMAIL: krs500@msn.com 

.> t ·. \ 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dwayne MANNING, a/k/a Rude Dog, a/k/a Jonathan Manning, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7518.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.

Decided Jan. 24, 2003.

Dwayne Manning, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

*154Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Dwayne Manning, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the movant can demonstrate both “ ‘(1) that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Manning has not made the requisite showing. *See United States v. Manning,*Nos. CR-95-156-H; CA-02-356-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 2002; filed Sept. 27, 2002 & entered Sept. 30, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF
              THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350)

         The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and chief financial
officer of FCB Financial Corp., certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2002, which accompanies this certification fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of FCB
Financial Corp. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. ss. 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose.

         Dated this 13th day of August, 2002.

                                                     /s/ Brian R. Foster
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Brian R. Foster
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          1,490,702
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   5,921,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                8,046,204
<PP&E>                                          4,069,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,239,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,468,759
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           48,022
<OTHER-SE>                                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,239,083
<SALES>                                        21,138,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               21,138,948
<CGS>                                          15,293,167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  19,921,411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                141,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,272,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                      551,182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      721,073
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .15



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 69598]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28180]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List Proposed Addition

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed addition to the procurement list.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add a service to the Procurement 
List that will be provided by the nonprofit agency employing persons 
who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    Comments Must be Received on or Before: 12/21/2012.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.
    For Further Information or to Submit Comments Contact: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Addition

    If the Committee approves the proposed addition, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the service listed below from the nonprofit agency employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following service is proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agency listed:

Service

Service Type/Location: Base Operations Support, Directorate of 
Public Works, Fort Lee, Virginia.
NPA: Skookum Educational Programs, Bremerton, WA
Contracting Activity: Mission and Installation Contracting Command--
Fort Lee, Fort Lee, VA

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-28180 Filed 11-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
1Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-30720

Summary Calendar

HELEN M. SAVOY

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

METHODIST HOSPITAL

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Western District of Louisiana

(96-CV-226)

November 26, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Appellant Savoy sued Methodist Hospital of Houston, Texas in

Louisiana for damages arising from the death of her husband

allegedly resulting from blood transfusions administered to him

while hospitalized in Houston. Appellant contended that the blood

administered was contaminated which caused her husband’s death.
2

The hospital successfully moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(2) for

lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court correctly ruled

that under both Louisiana and Texas law, the administering of blood

was a medical service and not the sale of a product, and that the

hospital lacked the necessary minimum contacts with Louisiana to

make it amenable to suit in Louisiana. We agree for the reasons

stated by the district court.

Appellant contends that the district court erred in its

“stream of commerce” analysis because it relied on the 1990 version

of Louisiana Civil Code Article 2322.1. It is correct that the

court relied on the 1990 version and not the version in effect at

the time the blood was administered. The analysis is not adversely

affected by this fact, however, because it is clear that under both

Texas and Louisiana law in effect at the time of the transfusions,

blood was not a product. 

Alternatively, even if blood was considered a product, there

are still insufficient contacts by the hospital with Louisiana to

make it amenable to suit in Louisiana.

AFFIRMED.