3984 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2024 / Notices 

• Its physical address (§ 371.107a); 

• Its U.S. DOT license numbers 

(§ 371.107b); 

• A statement indicating it will not 

transport the shipper’s goods but will 

only arrange for goods to be transported 

by a registered motor carrier 

(§ 371.107c); 

• If the broker chooses to publish 

rates on its website or solicitation 

materials, the broker must also publish 

a statement that the rates are based on 

a motor carrier’s publicly available rates 

(§ 371.107d); 

• If broker chooses to publish a list of 

motor carriers it works with, the list 

must be a list only of carriers with 

which brokers have agreements 

(§ 371.107e); and 

• Brokers must publish information 

regarding their cancellation policies, 

including information on deposits and 

refunds (§ 371.117a). 

For the exact text of regulations see 

section 12 part I of this document. 

II. Second Phase: ‘‘Contact’’ 

When an HHG shipper makes a 

reasonable request seeking additional 

information about broker services, the 

HHG broker must collect the following 

information and distribute it to the HHG 

shipper: 

• A list of carriers it has agreements 

with (§ 371.109a); and 

• A statement indicating the broker is 

not a carrier and that the broker is only 

arranging transportation of shipper’s 

goods (§ 371.109b). 

For the exact text of regulations see 

Section 12 Part II. 

III. Third Phase: ‘‘Estimate’’ 

When an HHG shipper requests an 

estimate, the broker must collect the 

following information and provide it to 

the shipper: 

• FMCSA’s published information 

material: (1) ‘‘Ready to Move? Tips for 

a Successful Interstate Move’’ and (2) 

‘‘Your Rights and Responsibilities When 

You Move (2022 Update)’’ (§ 371.111a1, 

2, and 3); 

• A written estimate based on a 

physical survey of household items 

(§ 371.113a) and published carrier rates 

(§ 371.113b); and 

• If applicable, a ‘‘Waiver’’ receipt 

showing shipper waived their right to a 

physical survey of their household 

items (§ 371.113b). 

The broker must obtain a signed 

document showing that FMCSA’s 

published information material was 

received by the shipper (§ 371.111c). For 

the exact text of regulations see section 

12 part III. 

IV. Fourth Phase: ‘‘Agreement’’ 

Should the shipper find the 

estimate(s) and broker services 

reasonable and wish to book the 

broker’s services, the two parties must 

enter into an agreement. At this point it 

is standard practice for shippers to pay 

a deposit or full payment. Before a 

deposit is collected, the broker must 

collect the following information and 

distribute it to the HHG shipper: 

• An agreement document with 

required specifications as laid out by 

regulation § 371.115; and 

• An agreement document which 

highlights the broker’s and/or motor 

carrier’s refund policy for cancelation of 

agreements (§ 371.117a). 

For the exact text of regulations see 

section 12 part IV. 

V. Fifth Phase: ‘‘Delivery’’ 

After the broker confirms delivery of 

the household goods by the carrier, the 

broker must collect the following 

information and distribute it to the HHG 

shipper: 

• A receipt with transaction data, 

including cancelation details if the 

agreement was canceled as laid out by 

49 CFR 371.3. 

The complete collection of 

information, required by the referenced 

regulations, assists shippers in their 

business dealings with interstate HHG 

brokers. The information collected is 

used by prospective shippers to make 

informed decisions about contracts, 

services ordered, executed, and settled. 

The HHG broker is often the primary 

contact for individual shippers and in 

the best position to educate shippers 

and prepare them for a successful move. 

The information collection is intended 

to combat deceptive business practices; 

the information helps enforcement 

personnel better protect consumers by 

verifying that shippers are receiving 

information as required by regulations. 

FMCSA revises the total annual 

burden to 86,488 hours. This is an 

increase of 13,680 annual burden hours 

from the currently approved 72,808 

burden estimate. The increase is due to 

the following: 

(1) FMCSA’s records for household 

goods brokers increased from 652 

brokers to 1,256 brokers. 

Title: Practices of Household Goods 

Brokers. 

OMB Control Number: 2126–0048. 

Type of Request: Renewal of currently 

approved collection. 

Respondents: Brokers of Household 

Goods. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

1,256. 

Estimated Time per Response: Varies. 

Expiration Date: May 31, 2024. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden: 

86,488. 

Public Comments Invited: You are 

asked to comment on any aspect of this 

information collection, including: (1) 

whether the proposed collection is 

necessary for the performance of 

FMCSA’s functions; (2) the accuracy of 

the estimated burden; (3) ways for 

FMCSA to enhance the quality, 

usefulness, and clarity of the collected 

information; and (4) ways that the 

burden could be minimized without 

reducing the quality of the collected 

information. The Agency will 

summarize or include your comments in 

the request for OMB’s clearance of this 

ICR. 

Issued under the authority of 49 CFR 

1.87. 

Thomas P. Keane, 

Associate Administrator, Office of Research 

and Registration. 

[FR Doc. 2024–01080 Filed 1–19–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Railroad Administration 

[Docket No. FRA–2023–0002–N–24] 

Proposed Agency Information 

Collection Activities; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Federal Railroad 

Administration (FRA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of information collection; 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) and its 

implementing regulations, this notice 

announces that FRA is forwarding the 

Information Collection Request (ICR) 

abstracted below to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and comment. The ICR describes 

the information collection and its 

expected burden. On July 21, 2023, FRA 

published a notice providing a 60-day 

period for public comment on the ICR. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before February 

21, 2024. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed ICR 

should be sent within 30 days of 

publication of this notice to 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. 

Find the particular ICR by selecting 

‘‘Currently under Review—Open for 

Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2024 / Notices 3985 

1See 49 CFR 229.61. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Arlette Mussington, Information 

Collection Clearance Officer, at email: 

arlette.mussington@dot.gov or 

telephone: (571) 609–1285, or Ms. 

Joanne Swafford, Information Collection 

Clearance Officer, at email: 

joanne.swafford@dot.gov or telephone: 

(757) 897–9908. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PRA, 

44 U.S.C. 3501–3520, and its 

implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 

1320, require Federal agencies to issue 

two notices seeking public comment on 

information collection activities before 

OMB may approve paperwork packages. 

See 44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507; 5 CFR 1320.8 

through 1320.12. On July 21, 2023, FRA 

published a 60-day notice in the Federal 

Register soliciting public comment on 

the ICR for which it is now seeking 

OMB approval. See 88 FR 47233. FRA 

received 11 comments, summarized 

below, related to the proposed 

collection of information. 

FRA received several comments from 

labor organizations, individuals 

(including a railroad employee), the 

National Railroad Passenger Corporation 

(Amtrak), and interested coalitions that 

strongly support this proposed ICR. 

Noting their safety concerns with long 

trains, the Transportation Division of 

the International Association of Sheet 

Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation 

workers (SMART–TD), the 

Transportation Trades Department of 

the AFL–CIO (TTD), an individual 

railroad employee, and the Illinois 

Commerce Commission (ICC) provided 

feedback regarding the steady and 

significant increase of long train lengths 

and noted that railroads already retain 

some of the data FRA is proposing to 

collect. SMART–TD commented that 

‘‘tracking the lengths and tonnage of all 

freight trains will take this information 

from the realm of anecdotal to 

actionable.’’ Further, TTD commented 

that, ‘‘This information collection 

request comes at a time of widespread 

safety issues in the freight rail industry’’ 

and ‘‘We commend FRA for moving 

forward with this ICR and request that 

the agency consider our recommended 

additions to the proposed reporting 

requirements.’’ Amtrak noted that 

freight traffic has a major impact on the 

performance of Amtrak’s trains and that 

increasingly long freight trains have 

exacerbated these problems. The 

prevailing opinion of these supportive 

commenters is that this proposed 

collection of information on train length 

is essential to understanding how to 

improve the safe and efficient operation 

of long trains. 

In expressing support for this ICR, 

various commenters encouraged FRA to 

collect additional categories of 

information. For example, a group of 

nine urban Chicago communities, 

identified as the Coalition to Stop 

CPKC, recommended that the monthly 

data be presented in a format that allows 

interested parties to determine 

increasing train lengths in key regional 

areas. TTD encouraged FRA to consider 

collecting data related to train weight 

distribution, the number of buffer cars 

between hazardous materials shipments 

and crew member locations, and the 

presence of distributed power units 

(DPUs). 

FRA did not add these categories 

because requiring respondents to 

provide this additional information 

without further FRA review, could 

create additional requirements that are 

beyond the initial purpose of this 

information collection. Similarly, 

commenter recommendations to include 

variables, such as delays to emergency 

responders due to blocked crossings and 

establishing a retroactive baseline year, 

are not being considered at this time. 

FRA directs commenters to field IDs F22 

through F24.C of Form FRA F 6180.277, 

which request blocked crossing 

information. Once the ICR has been 

approved, FRA will review the data 

collected and consider adding 

additional data categories in the future. 

Two individuals commented that the 

proposed ICR creates an excessive 

paperwork burden on respondents and 

that they do not believe FRA will be 

able to process and analyze the 

collected data in a timely manner. These 

commenters also asserted they do not 

believe FRA is avoiding duplicative 

collections by reviewing train length 

data collected on Form FRA F 6180.54. 

FRA is cognizant of the increased 

paperwork burdens that collecting this 

type of data create and has incorporated 

several measures to minimize them. As 

an example, FRA notes that reviewing 

train length information from existing 

Form FRA F 6180.54 under the Special 

Study Block 49a data field, rather than 

collecting the data on Form FRA F 

6180.277, will avoid duplicative 

collections. When developing this 

proposed ICR, FRA considered the 

volume of data to be collected and the 

agency’s capability to collect, analyze, 

and review it. Additionally, FRA’s 

estimate of 40 minutes per month for 

the average time per response, or 8 

hours annually, is based on datacompiling methods already in use by 

Class I railroads for other FRA reporting 

requirements. Furthermore, FRA agrees 

with the ICC’s comment that the burden 

will be manageable and will decrease 

over time once a railroad has 

established the protocol to collect, if the 

railroad does not already do so, and 

present this data. 

FRA received comments that the ICR 

does not define what constitutes 

‘‘emergency’’, and ‘‘communication 

event losses’’. FRA addressed this 

comment by revising field ID F12, to 

include reference to 49 CFR 220.13 to 

define ‘‘emergency events’’. 

‘‘Communication loss events’’ are 

described in field IDs F13 through F15.C 

of Form FRA F 6180.277. Commenters 

also asserted that FRA should collect 

data on broken drawbars and that FRA 

omitted the word ‘‘certification’’ with 

respect to engineer certification 

revocations. 

In response to this feedback, and 

upon further review, FRA agrees with 

the recommendation to collect data on 

broken drawbars as part of the ‘‘draft 

system.’’ 1 To accomplish this, FRA is 

updating the data field description in 

Form FRA F 6180.277 field IDs F16 

through F16.C by replacing the term 

‘‘broken knuckles’’ with ‘‘train 

separations due to broken couplers and 

draft gear.’’ Additionally, FRA changed 

the term ‘‘knuckles’’ to ‘‘couplers’’ in 

field IDs F16 through F16.C to be 

consistent with railroad terminology 

used in FRA’s regulations. Further, FRA 

updated the form instructions in field ID 

F2 to ‘‘The reporting railroad alphabetic 

code must match the code used in the 

submission of Form FRA F 6180.54 to 

FRA’’ to make it clear which data are 

being requested. 

FRA also acknowledges the omission 

of the word ‘‘certification’’ and is 

updating the language throughout Form 

FRA F 6180.277 from ‘‘engineer 

revocations’’ to ‘‘engineer certification 

revocations’’. FRA has uploaded the 

updated form in the PRA docket 

referenced above at https://

www.regulations.gov/docket/FRA-2023- 

0002/document. From that page, Form 

FRA F 6180.277 can be accessed by 

using the ‘‘refine results’’ menu to the 

left of the screen. Under ‘‘Document 

Type’’ check the box labeled 

‘‘Supporting & Related Material’’ and 

the form will be displayed under the 

search results. 

The Coalition to Stop CPKC 

commented that FRA is silent on the 

extent to which the reported data would 

be publicly available. FRA is planning 

to analyze the collected data and may 

publicly share the data or FRA’s 

analysis in reports, testimony, or other 

safety-related agency actions. 

In the proposed ICR, FRA stated that 

the proposal would require Class I 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
3986 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2024 / Notices 

2 88 FR 47233 at 47234. 

3 Id. and 49 CFR part 225. 

4 49 CFR 225.11(b). 

5 88 FR 27570. 

6 Id. 

7 Id. (citing GAO’s May 2019 report titled RAIL 

SAFETY: Freight Trains Are Getting Longer, and 

Additional Information is Needed to Assess Their 

Impact, GAO–19–443 (available at https://

www.gao.gov/assets/gao-19-443.pdf). 

8 Id. at 11. 

9 Id. 

10 Id. at 12. 11 Id. 12https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/ 

2022-2/2023_RDT_CurrentProjects_complete_

FINAL.pdf. 13 Information about NAS’s study and its meeting 

agendas are available at https://

www.nationalacadameies.org/our-work/impacts-oftrains-longer-than-7500-feet. The study was 

required by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs 

Act, Public Law 117–58, 22422, 35 Stat. 751 (2021). 

14This ICR is limited to Class I railroads. 

freight railroads to provide FRA with 

the information in Form FRA F 

6180.277 on a monthly basis 2 without 

specifying when it would expect the 

form to be submitted. The proposed ICR 

also stated that ‘‘FRA is not asking 

railroads to provide train length 

information for any FRA-reportable 

accident or incident’’ that a railroad is 

required to report to FRA on a form 

under the agency’s existing 

requirements so as to avoid seemingly 

duplicative reporting.3 As each railroad 

is required under the existing reporting 

regulation to submit required forms 

within 30 days after expiration of the 

month during which the accidents/ 

incidents occurred,4 FRA is clarifying 

that the same 30-day submission and 

monthly reporting period applies to this 

information collection request. 

Requesting this information collection 

in conjunction with the existing 

reporting requirements will enable each 

Class I freight railroad to coordinate its 

submissions and avoid duplicative 

reporting as previously described. 

Before OMB decides whether to 

approve this proposed collection of 

information, it must provide 30 days’ 

notice for public comment. Federal law 

requires OMB to approve or disapprove 

paperwork packages between 30 and 60 

days after the 30-day notice is 

published. See 44 U.S.C. 3507(b)–(c), 5 

CFR 1320.12(d), 60 FR 44978, 44983, 

Aug. 29, 1995. 

The 30-day notice both informs and 

gives the regulated community the 

opportunity to file relevant comments 

and affords the agency adequate time to 

digest public comments before it 

renders a decision. See 60 FR 44983, 

Aug. 29, 1995. Therefore, respondents 

should submit their respective 

comments to OMB within 30 days of 

publication to best ensure having their 

full effect. 

Comments are invited on the 

following ICR regarding: (1) whether the 

information collection activities are 

necessary for FRA to properly execute 

its functions, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) the accuracy of FRA’s estimates of 

the burden of the information collection 

activities, including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used to 

determine the estimates; (3) ways for 

FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information being 

collected; and (4) ways to minimize the 

burden of information collection 

activities on the public, including the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

The summary below describes the ICR 

that FRA will submit for OMB clearance 

as the PRA requires: 

Title: Class I Freight-Train Length 

Reporting. 

OMB Control Number: 2130–NEW. 

Abstract: On May 2, 2023, FRA issued 

Safety Advisory 2023–03, ‘‘Accident 

Mitigation and Train Length,’’ (Safety 

Advisory) to ensure railroads and 

railroad employees are aware of the 

potential complexities associated with 

operating longer trains and to 

recommend that they take appropriate 

measures to address those complexities 

to ensure the safe operation of such 

trains.5 The Safety Advisory cited three 

significant incidents that occurred since 

2022 involving trains with more than 

200 cars, each approximately more than 

10,000 feet in length and weighing more 

than 17,000 trailing tons, where train 

handling and train makeup are believed 

to have caused, or contributed to, the 

accidents and incidents. In the Safety 

Advisory, FRA explained that the 

operation of these longer trains presents 

different, complex, operational 

challenges which can be exacerbated by 

the weight and makeup of trains. 

Consequently, FRA recommended that 

railroads review their operating rules 

and existing locomotive engineer 

certification programs to address 

operational complexities of train length, 

take appropriate action to prevent the 

loss of communications between end-oftrain devices, and mitigate the impacts 

of long trains on blocked crossings.6

In the Safety Advisory, FRA also 

explained that, in 2019, the U.S. 

Government Accountability Office 

(GAO) issued a report finding that 

freight-train length, particularly for 

Class I railroads, increased in recent 

years.7 GAO was able to procure limited 

data from some of the railroads, 

including data indicating average train 

lengths of 6,100 feet and 7,500 feet from 

two Class I railroads.8 The data 

represent an increase in the average 

length of a train of about 25 percent for 

both railroads over a 10-year period.9

Each Class I railroad reportedly told 

GAO that they operate some number of 

longer trains, with one railroad 

reporting that it operates a train on a 

regular basis over 12,000 feet long and 

another railroad operating a train on a 

regular basis over 16,000 feet long.10

These same railroads responded that 

trains over 10,000 feet long were only 1 

to 2 percent of their total train-miles.11

In the Safety Advisory, FRA also 

indicated that it was in the process of 

conducting research on the operational 

complexities of longer trains, including 

air brake system performance and 

resulting train dynamics.12 The Safety 

Advisory also noted that, in response to 

a statutory requirement, FRA entered 

into an agreement with the National 

Academies of Sciences, Engineering, 

and Medicine (NAS) to examine factors 

associated with the operation of freight 

trains longer than 7,500 feet. FRA notes, 

however, that any data collected from 

the industry during these studies may 

be no more detailed or complete than 

the data GAO was able to obtain from 

the railroads for its report.13

As a next step, FRA is initiating a new 

ICR to gather train length data from 

Class I freight railroads as the safety 

concerns associated with long trains 

largely focus on these railroads.14

Specifically, under the proposed 

information collection, Class I freight 

railroads would provide to FRA, on a 

monthly basis, data regarding the total 

number of trains operated, the total 

quantity of rolling equipment in those 

trains, and the total trailing tonnage in 

specified train length categories (e.g., 

less than or equal to 7,500 feet, greater 

than 7,500 feet). In addition, FRA 

proposes to collect data from the Class 

I freight railroads that may inform 

potential complexities and safety 

concerns associated with operating 

longer trains, such as the number of 

emergency events, communication loss 

events, train separations due to broken 

couplers and draft gear, air hose 

separations, positive train control 

enforcements, and the number of 

locomotive engineer certification 

revocations under 49 CFR part 240 and 

conductor certification revocations 

under 49 CFR part 242. The requested 

data will be collected monthly using an 

Excel-based form (Form FRA F 

6180.277). 

The data collection is necessary to 

create an industry-wide database that 

will allow FRA to make objective 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2024 / Notices 3987 

15 49 U.S.C. 20103(a). 

findings to support guidance or 

recommendations to the industry, or 

regulatory action. Of note, FRA is 

seeking to collect data on train length on 

an ongoing basis, as opposed to this 

being a one-time study. FRA will use 

the collected data to establish an initial 

baseline for the length of trains 

operating within the U.S. rail system as 

well as to determine if train lengths are 

changing over time. FRA may also use 

the collected data in future analyses to 

better understand the impact of train 

length on safety: e.g., to determine 

whether trains of certain lengths are 

disproportionately involved in certain 

type of accidents/incidents or other 

undesired events such as loss of 

communications or train stalling. 

FRA has incorporated several 

measures to minimize respondents’ 

paperwork burden in this proposed 

collection. For example, to avoid 

duplicating efforts, FRA is not asking 

railroads to provide train length 

information for any FRA-reportable 

accident or incident for which a Form 

FRA F 6180.54 is filed. Instead, for any 

train involved in an accident for which 

a Form FRA F 6180.54 is filed, FRA will 

review train length data collected on 

that form and will not seek to collect the 

same data proposed in this collection. 

As provided by Congress to the 

Secretary of Transportation, and as 

delegated, FRA has broad statutory 

authority to oversee matters related to 

rail safety.15 As noted in the Safety 

Advisory, the greater operational 

complexities associated with longer 

trains necessitate that railroads take 

appropriate safety measures to manage 

their potentially more complex in-train 

forces. This proposed collection is a 

component of FRA’s ongoing research to 

closely monitor and analyze the impact 

of train length on rail safety. 

Type of Request: Approval of a new 

collection of information. 

Affected Public: Businesses. 

Form(s): Form FRA F 6180.277. 

Respondent Universe: Class I freight 

railroads. 

Frequency of Submission: Monthly/ 

recurring. 

Total Estimated Annual Responses: 

72 reports. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden: 576 

hours. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden Hour 

Dollar Cost Equivalent: $49,496. 

FRA informs all interested parties that 

it may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

respondent is not required to respond 

to, a collection of information that does 

not display a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520. 

Allison Ishihara Fultz, 

Chief Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2024–01044 Filed 1–19–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

United States Mint 

Pricing for Liberty & Britannia 

Products 

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department 

of the Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The United States Mint is 

setting prices for the Liberty & Britannia 

Products. 

24YA ..... Liberty & Britannia 24K 

High Relief Gold Proof 

Coin.

Per grid. 

24YB ..... Liberty & Britannia Silver 

Proof Medal.

$89.00. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann 

Bailey, Sales and Marketing, United 

States Mint, 801 9th Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20220; or call 202–354– 

7500. 

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, & 

9701. 

Eric Anderson, 

Executive Secretary, United States Mint. 

[FR Doc. 2024–01091 Filed 1–19–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–37–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

United States Mint 

Prices of Liberty & Britannia 24K High 

Relief Gold Proof Coin on the ‘‘2024 

Pricing of Numismatic Gold, 

Commemorative Gold, Platinum, and 

Palladium Products’’ Grid 

AGENCY: United States Mint, Department 

of the Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The United States Mint 

announces pricing for the Liberty & 

Britannia 24K High Relief Gold Proof 

Coin on the 2024 Pricing of Numismatic 

Gold, Commemorative Gold, Platinum, 

and Palladium Products Grid. 

The complete 2024 Pricing of 

Numismatic Gold, Commemorative 

Gold, Platinum, and Palladium Products 

Grid will be available online at https:// 

catalog.usmint.gov/coin-programs/ 

american-eagle-coins. 

Pricing can vary weekly dependent 

upon the London Bullion Market 

Association gold, platinum, and 

palladium prices weekly average. The 

pricing for all United States Mint 

numismatic gold, platinum, and 

palladium products is evaluated every 

Wednesday and modified as necessary. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann 

Bailey, Sales and Marketing Directorate, 

United States Mint, 801 9th Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20220; or call 202–354– 

7500 or Rosa.Williams@

usmint.treas.gov. 

Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5112 & 9701. 

Eric Anderson, 

Executive Secretary, United States Mint. 

[FR Doc. 2024–01093 Filed 1–19–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–37–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1