alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
99.1





Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30,
2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |    
|------------------- |  | ---
|                   
|Dated: May 28, 2003 |  | By:
|                    |  |    



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.8

             AIRNET SYSTEMS, INC. SALARY FOR OPTIONS CONVERSION PLAN
                           EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 6, 2000

The Salary for Options Conversion Plan allows Executive Officers and Senior
Managers (Tier I Managers) to exchange, on an annual basis, up to 25% of their
base salary for Stock Option Grants. The Executive Officers (as of December 31,
1999) are required to participate at a 5% level and may, at their discretion,
exchange up to an additional 20% of their base salary. The plan, as approved by
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, is a one-time plan.

The value of the options received is determined by the percent of salary being
exchanged. Salary will be exchanged according to the following table:

EXCHANGE RATES

OPTION VALUE AS A

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

           PERCENT OF SALARY      EXCHANGE RATE    PERCENT OF SALARY
           -----------------      -------------    -----------------
<S>              <C>                 <C>                <C>
                   5.0%               1.50                7.5%
                  10.0%               1.75               17.5%
                  15.0%               2.00               30.0%
                  20.0%               2.50               50.0%
                  25.0%               3.00               75.0%

</TABLE>

The Stock Option Grants will be priced at the closing price of AirNet Systems,
Inc. common shares on the New York Stock Exchange on the day prior to the start
of the plan.

All plan participants will be required to complete and sign a Salary for Option
Exchange Enrolment Form two weeks prior to the start of the plan year. The
completed and signed form must be submitted to the Chief Financial Officer or
the Controller.

Once the plan year has begun NO changes will be permitted.

All options issued under the plan will vest one year after being issued. Should
the participant's employment with AirNet be terminated for other than just cause
or willful resignation prior to the anniversary of the options being granted,
the number of options available to the participant will be prorated through the
date of termination and all others will be forfeited. Non-forfeited options of
terminated participants will continue to have the same vesting period (one year)
and the participant will have 90 days after they become fully vested to exercise
such options. Should the participant willfully resign or be terminated for just
cause, all of the unvested options granted under this plan will be cancelled.

The Compensation Committee reserves the right to amend, modify, terminate or
extend the plan on an annual basis, however no such amendment, modification or
termination will occur during a plan year.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1508

AN ACT

To assure that all Federal employees work and are paid.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1508 ES

1 SECTION 1. ALL FEDERAL EMPLOYEES DEEMED TO BE ES2 SENTIAL EMPLOYEES.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1342 of title 31, United

4 States Code, is amended for the period December 15,

5 1995 through February 1, 1996—

6 (1) by inserting after the first sentence ‘‘All of7 ficers and employees of the United States Govern8 ment or the District of Columbia government shall

9 be deemed to be performing services relating to

10 emergencies involving the safety of human life or the

11 protection of property.’’; and

12 (2) by striking out the last sentence.

Passed the Senate December 22, 1995.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1508

AN ACT

To assure that all Federal employees work and are

paid.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1747

To correct the marking requirements for American-made feather and downfilled products.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 13, 1996

Mr. GRAMM (for himself and Ms. MOSELEY-BRAUN) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To correct the marking requirements for American-made

feather and down-filled products.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARKING OF CERTAIN AMERICAN-MADE TEX4 TILE PRODUCTS.

5 Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.

6 1304) is amended by redesignating subsections (f), (g),

7 and (h) as subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively, and

8 inserting before subsection (g), as redesignated, the fol9 lowing new subsection:
2

S 1747 IS

1 ‘‘(f) MARKING OF CERTAIN AMERICAN-MADE TEX2 TILE PRODUCTS.—An exception under subsection (a)(3)

3 of this title shall apply for textile products classified under

4 HTS subheading 9404.90: Provided, That such products

5 are manufactured in the United States and that such

6 manufacturing effects a change to subheading 9404.90

7 from any other heading: Provided further, That such prod8 ucts are filled with feathers and/or down: Provided further,

9 That such product shells are of cotton fabric, no less than

10 85 per centum by weight of cotton.’’.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                  CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Year Ended December 31,
                                             ----------------------------------------------------------
                                               1998         1997        1996        1995        1994 
                                             ---------    ---------   ---------   ---------   ---------
                                                           (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                          <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Income before provision for income taxes     $296,777     $297,499    $197,250    $215,872    $301,233
    Distributions in excess of equity
       earnings of affiliates                  44,939       27,282       9,677          --          --
    Equity earnings (losses) in excess of    
       distributions                               --           --          --      (4,490)     (3,930)
    Interest                                   99,926      125,492     113,989     106,568      77,792
    Amortization of previously capitalized
       interest                                 2,858        4,115       3,600       3,440       3,039
    Portion of rent representative of
       interest factor                         11,333       13,000      11,000      10,928      11,305
                                             --------     --------    --------    --------    --------
       Income as adjusted                    $455,833     $467,388    $335,516    $332,318    $389,439
                                             ========     ========    ========    ========    ======== 

Fixed charges
    Interest expense                         $ 99,926     $125,492    $113,989    $106,568    $ 77,792
    Capitalized interest                        5,000        7,000      12,000       5,000      12,000
    Portion of rent representative of
       interest factor                         11,333       13,000      11,000      10,928      11,305
                                             --------     --------    --------    --------    --------
       Total fixed charges                   $116,259     $145,492    $136,989    $122,496    $101,097
                                             ========     ========    ========    ========    ======== 
Ratio of earnings to
       fixed charges                            3.92x        3.21x       2.45x       2.71x       3.85x
</TABLE>



                                       4
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE  CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.  FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Senior Vice President, Finance of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 14, 2009

/s/ BERNARD F. DENOYER Bernard F. Denoyer Senior Vice President, Finance


---



QuickLinks
exv10w45









Exhibit 10.45




AMENDMENT

TO

STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIP AGREEMENT





     This Amendment to that Strategic Relationship Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made by and
between Fannie Mae (“Fannie Mae”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
United States, and Nationstar Mortgage LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, (“Nationstar”).



     WHEREAS, Fannie Mae and Nationstar have entered into that certain Strategic Relationship
Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated December 16, 2009, and have agreed to amend and supplement the
Agreement to modify Exhibit A-2 which addresses certain incentive compensation applicable to
Mortgage Loans serviced by Nationstar using High Touch Servicing Protocols;



     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as
follows:




	I.	 	DEFINED TERMS. Capitalized terms contained in this Amendment shall have the
respective meanings herein as such terms have in the Agreement.






	II.	 	AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT. The definition of Interim Incentive Period in Section 2.b.
of Exhibit A-2 (“Credit Performance – Interim Framework”) of the Agreement is amended and
restated in it entirety as follows:






“Interim Incentive Period: The period following the applicable Transfer Date
through December 31, 2011.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned parties to this Agreement has caused this Agreement to
be duly executed in its name by one of its duly authorized officers.



Accepted and Agreed to as of the 17th day of November, 2011




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	 
	Fannie Mae	 	Nationstar Mortgage LLC
	 
	By: 	 /s/ Leslie Peeler	 	By: 	 /s/  Robert L. Appel
	 
	 	 	 
	 	Name: 	 Leslie Peeler	 	 	Name: 	 Robert L. Appel
	 	Title:	 Vice President	 	 	Title:	EVP Servicing
	 	Date: 11-17-11	 	 	Date: 11-17-11
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1828 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1828

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade for the vessel TOP GUN, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 1996

  Mr. Heflin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
    coastwise trade for the vessel TOP GUN, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, 
chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App. 289), and section 12106 of title 46, United 
States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade for the vessel TOP GUN, United States official number 
623642.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc.
      (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30April 30, 2007
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Martin E. Thorp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      In Veritas Medical Diagnostics, Inc. and will be retained by In Veritas Medical
      Diagnostics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
      its
      staff upon request.





June
      14,
      2007





*/s/
      Martin E. Thorp*





Martin
      E.
      Thorp


Chief
      Financial Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

** **

**Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors

CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (No. 333-31229, No. 333-73230, No. 333-112564 and No. 333-131247) onForm S-8 and the registration statements (No. 333-88697, No. 333-35634,No. 333-53766, No. 333-58568, No. 333-67044, No. 333-72166, No.333-87556, No. 333-102773, No. 333-103008, No. 333-107918, No. 333-128334, No.333-131295 and No. 333-131655) on Form S-3 of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.of our reports dated March 15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity and  cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and therelated financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31,2005 and the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual reporton Form 10-K of CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP               |   |
|----------------------------|--------|
|                       |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania |
| March 15, 2006             |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Noah ROBINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-2331.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 27, 2002.

Decided Feb. 7, 2003.

*782Before POSNER, RIPPLE, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This is an appeal from an order by the district judge under Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 correcting a clerical error in the judgment. The judge at the sentencing hearing sentenced the defendant to life in prison, but the written judgment, issued afterwards, mistakenly reported the sentence as 10 years. Everyone including the defendant assumed that the sentence was indeed life, and the judge’s Rule 36 order merely ratifies this assumption. The defendant’s argument that the judge changed his mind after the sentencing hearing and reduced the sentence is frivolous, as are the other arguments that he makes in his appeal briefs, such as that he is the victim of fraud by the prosecutor. The order correcting the judgment is

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, Thomas E.Dunn the Chief Financial Officer of SI International, Inc. (the “Company”), hasexecuted this certification in connection with the filing with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ending March 29, 2003 (the “Report”). The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
| Date:  | May 12, 2003                                                                        |   |                 /s/ Thomas E. Dunn |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:     Thomas E. Dunn                                        |
|   | Title:       EVP, Chief Financial Officer &  Treasurer |

 

----
#### William E. VAN TREESE, Appellant, v. Dennis BLOME, Sheriff, Sued as Sheriff Dennis Bloom; Don Zeller, Sued as Lt. Sheriff Donald Zeller; Sergeant Sheriff Desotel; Cedar Rapids, City of; Jan Dooley, RN; Don Cannie; Sgt. Houlahan; Sgt. Hromidko, Appellees.

No. 93-1445.

United. States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 5, 1993.

Decided Oct. 13, 1993.

William E. Van Treese, pro se.

Mohammad H. Sheronick, Cedar Rapids, IA, argued, for appellees.

Before MeMILLIAN, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

William E. Van Treese appeals the district court’s1 judgment for defendants following a bench trial in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We affirm.

Van Treese filed a series of complaints against Linn County Sheriff Dennis Blome; Lieutenant Donald Zeller; Sergeants Deso-tel, Houlahan, and Hromidiko; Nurse Jan Dooley; the City of Cedar Rapids; and Don Cannie. Van Treese claimed defendants violated his equal rights, unconstitutionally denied him access to the courts, were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs, and violated the Due Process Clause and the Eighth Amendment. After a bench trial, the district court dismissed with prejudice all of the defendants.

We cannot review the district court’s factual findings, refusal to call witnesses, or denial of Van Treese’s motions, as Van Treese did not provide a trial transcript as required by Fed.R.App.P. 10(b), and he did not request one at government expense. *See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters,*827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (appellant’s failure to provide a complete transcript makes it impossible to review evidence presented at trial), *cert. denied,*484 U.S. 1071, 108 S.Ct. 1041, 98 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1988). Further, Van Treese has not explained in his brief how he was prejudiced by the district court’s refusal to call witnesses and denial of his motions. *See Estes v. Texas,*381 U.S. 532, 542-43, 85 S.Ct. 1628, 1632-33, 14 L.Ed.2d 543 (1965) (most due process claims require specific showing of prejudice); *Griffin-Ben v. Bowersox,*978 F.2d 455, 456 (8th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (citing *Estes).*

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation in the Northern District of Iowa.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  Date:  March 17, 2009
    /s/ Charles F. CargileCharles F. CargileSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1874 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1874

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are 
 obsolete or inconsistent with other statutes and to repeal a related 
       section of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Energy Standardization 
Act of 1996''.

SEC. 2. STANDARDIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY REQUIREMENTS WITH 
              GOVERNMENT-WIDE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Department of Energy Regulations.--
            (1) Section 501 of the Department of Energy Organization 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 7191) is amended by striking subsections (b) and 
        (d).
            (2) Technical and conforming amendment.--Section 501(e) of 
        the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7191(e)) 
        is amended by striking ``subsections (b), (c), and (d)'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (c)''.
    (b) Special Requirements Affecting Advisory Committees.--
            (1) Section 624 of the Department of Energy Organization 
        Act (42 U.S.C. 7234) is amended by--
                    (A) striking ``(a)''; and
                    (B) striking subsection (b).
            (2) Technical and conforming amendment.--Section 17 of the 
        Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 776) is 
        hereby repealed.

            Passed the Senate September 28, 1996.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1874

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend sections of the Department of Energy Organization Act that are 
 obsolete or inconsistent with other statutes and to repeal a related 
       section of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974.
```