alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NY PM-1 0 Attainment Determination Issues : ISSUE: EPA was required by June 30, 2001 (6 months after completion ofyear upon which attainment is based) to make an attainment determination for the New York County moderate PM-10 nonattainment area. The basis for this determination data with an ave rage 3-year annual arithmetic mean below 50.4 IJ9/m3

. As ofthe end of CY-2000 , most monitors in New York County showed no exceedances ofthis average for the years 1998, 1999, and 2000 . However, the Madison Avenue monitoring data showed exceedance ofthis average at a level of 54.9 1Jg/m3 for calendar year 2000. • NY claims that due to the location of monitor (distance from curb), monitor doesn't meet federal reference method monitor siting criteria. Therefore, data should be invalidated for attainment determination purposes . • NY also claims that, due to the construction activity which took place during the majority of CY2000 in and around the Mad ison Aven ue site , the monitor readings should be flagged (so as not to be used for attainment determination purposes). • EPA's position that the location of the monitor which doesn't conform to siting criteria is deminimis and should not have an impact on the use of data for attainment determination purposes . • EPA will support NY's claim of bad data if it can flag all days of monitoring data on which construction activity took place. If, after these data have been identified, the average annual arithmetic mean values show a maximum of 50.4 1Jg/m3 , then EPA would be willing to grant NY up to two extensions to show attainment by latest December 31 , 2002. NEXT STEPS: • NY should provide necessary flagged data showing all 2000 days during which construction activity took place. • NY must demonstrate that, with the exclusion of this exceptional data, the average annual arithmetic mean values for 2000 do not exceed 50.4 1Jg/m3

. • NY should clean up their PM-10 SIP- resolve any outstanding issues (i .e. contingency measures, adminstrative requirements , off-road inventory, etc.) • NY must formally request an extension ofthe attainment date. A report must accompany the extension request making a thorough case for being granted the extension. The requirements for being granted an attainment date extension is stated in the "PM-1 0 Attainment Determination Policy of 1994" . Basically , the State has to submit ajustification forgetting the attainment date e

xtension which in large partstates that t hey hav e put controls in place to reduce emissions in the area and that's the reason that they have met the 24 hourstandard, and all they need is more time for those controls to work fully. LEGALLY SUPPORTABLE BASIS FOR GRANTING STATE AN EXTENSION: • State would meet the requirements for an extension as stated in the Act under section 188(d)(1) and (2).
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE  CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.  FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Senior Vice President, Finance of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"). I am
delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 19, 2008

/s/ BERNARD F. DENOYER Bernard F. Denoyer Senior Vice President, Finance


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1636 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1636

 To designate the United States Courthouse under construction at 1030 
   Southwest 3rd Avenue, Portland, Oregon, as the ``Mark O. Hatfield 
          United States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 1996

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States Courthouse under construction at 1030 
   Southwest 3rd Avenue, Portland, Oregon, as the ``Mark O. Hatfield 
          United States Courthouse'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF MARK O. HATFIELD UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States Courthouse under construction at 1030 Southwest 
3rd Avenue in Portland, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the 
``Mark O. Hatfield United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the courthouse referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Mark O. Hatfield United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on January 3, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
SCWC

- 17-0000375

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

STATE OF HAWAII ORGANIZATION OF POLICE OFFICERS (SHOPO), Petitioner/Complainant-Appellant-Appellant,

vs.

HAWAI ʻ I LABOR RELATIONS BOARD; MARCUS R. OSHIRO; CLARK HIROTA; and STACY MONIZ, Respondents/Agency-Appellees-Appellees,

and

DEREK S.K. KAWAKAMI, Mayor of the County of Kaua ʻ i, State of Hawai ʻ i; TODD G. RAYBUCK, Chief of Police of the

Kaua ʻ i Police Department; COUNTY OF KAUA ʻ I, a political subdivision of the State of Hawai ʻ i, Respondents/Respondents-Appellees-Appellees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-17-0000375; CASE NO. 1CC161001259)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, and Eddins , JJ. ; Circuit Judge Cahill , in place of Ginoza, J., recused, and Circuit Judge Kubota , in place of Devens, J., recused )

Petitioner/Complainant-Appellant-Appellant State of Hawaii

Organization of Police Officers’ Application for Writ of Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000375 09-JUL-2024 12:45 PM Dkt. 20 ODAC2 Certiorari filed on May 20, 2024, is rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, July 9 , 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Peter T. Cahill

/s/ Peter K. Kubota
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Medivation, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: February 23, 2007



|       |  |                                                  
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/    C. PATRICK
MACHADO                        
|Name:  |  | C. Patrick Machado                               
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof,
regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1822 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 1822

   To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit the Secretary of 
Agriculture to waive the prohibition on the termination of conservation 
      reserve contracts for certain lands, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 1996

  Mr. Harkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit the Secretary of 
Agriculture to waive the prohibition on the termination of conservation 
      reserve contracts for certain lands, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF CONSERVATION RESERVE CONTRACTS BY OWNERS OR 
              OPERATORS.

    Section 1235(e) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3835(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 
following:
            ``(2) Certain lands excepted.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                following lands shall not be subject to an early 
                termination of contract under this subsection:
                            ``(i) Filterstrips, waterways, strips 
                        adjacent to riparian areas, windbreaks, and 
                        shelterbelts.
                            ``(ii) Land with an erodibility index of 
                        more than 15.
                            ``(iii) Other lands of high environmental 
                        value (including wetlands), as determined by 
                        the Secretary.
                    ``(B) Waiver.--The Secretary may waive the 
                application of subparagraph (A) to land if the 
                Secretary determines that the land will be used only--
                            ``(i) for haying, grazing, or other use not 
                        involving the destruction of vegetative cover; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) in a manner that adequately protects 
                        the natural resource base of the land.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT  32
                           CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                           18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                            AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
              SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


     Pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
     officer of the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the
     registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31,
     2004  (the  "Form  10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934 and that the
     information  contained in the Form 10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the
     registrant.

Date: May 17, 2004

Amanasu  Environment  Corporation

/s/ Atsushi Maki
Atsushi  Maki
President  and  Principle  Accounting  Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-17565, 333-33475 and 333-44371) of Renaissance
Worldwide, Inc. (formerly The Registry, Inc.) of our report dated February 12,
1998, except as to the "Stock Split and Authorized Shares" section of Note 10
which is as of March 24, 1998, appearing on page 26 of this Transition Report on
Form 10-K.


Price Waterhouse LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 26, 1998
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick L.
Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Patrick L. AlexanderPatrick
      L. AlexanderChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      13, 2009
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       EXHIBIT 5


                                 LAW OFFICES OF
                      PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
       A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS

                              695 TOWN CENTER DRIVE
                        COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626-1924
                            TELEPHONE (714) 668-6200
                            FACSIMILE (714) 979-1921
                              INTERNET www.phjw.com


                                January 14, 1997




Inland Casino Corporation
4225 Executive Square, Suite 1650
La Jolla, California 92037

     Re:          1995 Stock Option Plan

Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  We have acted as counsel for Inland Casino Corporation, a Utah
corporation (the "Company"), in connection with the 1995 Stock Option Plan of
the Company (the "Plan"). We have examined such documents, records, and matters
of law as we have deemed necessary for purposes of this opinion, and based
thereupon we are of the opinion that the shares of the Company's common stock,
$.001 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), that may be issued and sold
pursuant to the Plan will be, when issued and sold in accordance with such Plan,
duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

                  We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5
to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed by the Company on or about
January 14, 1997, to effect registration of the shares of Common Stock to be
issued and sold pursuant to the Plan under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.

                              Very truly yours,


                              /s/ Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.**

This certification isprovided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the“Issuer”). 

I, W. Marston Becker, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer,certify that: 

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Issuer. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Dated: May 7, 2008
S. 1669

One Hundred Fourth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the third day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-six

An Act

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical center in Jackson, Mississippi,

as the ‘‘G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL

CENTER, JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI.

(a) NAME.—The Department of Veterans Affairs medical center

in Jackson, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical

Center’’. Any reference to such medical center in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper of the United States

shall be considered to be a reference to the G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) shall take effect at noon

on January 3, 1997.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 5, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00464

- CR

Troy David CAMPEAU, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 755

- CR Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 21, 2020, we ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant was indigent. On February 24, 2020, a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law was filed. In its findings of fact and
conclusions of law, the trial court found that appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel. Also included in the supplemental clerk’s record is an order appointing Shane

Stolar cyzck as appellant’s appellate counsel.

We ORDER that appellant’s brief is due on April 6, 2020

.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 5th day of March, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1878

To amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to prohibit the licensing

of a permanent or interim nuclear waste storage facility outside the

50 States or the District of Columbia, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 1996

Mr. AKAKA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 to prohibit

the licensing of a permanent or interim nuclear waste

storage facility outside the 50 States or the District

of Columbia, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO LICENSE NU4 CLEAR WASTE STORAGE FACILITIES.

5 Title I of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42

6 U.S.C. 10121 et seq.) is amended by inserting after sec7 tion 101 the following:
2

•S 1878 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 102. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO LICENSE, CON2 STRUCT, OR OPERATE NUCLEAR WASTE

3 STORAGE FACILITIES.

4 ‘‘The Commission shall not have authority, under this

5 Act or any other law, to issue a license for, and it shall

6 be unlawful for any person to construct or operate, a facil7 ity or repository for interim or permanent storage of low8 level radioactive waste, high-level radioactive waste, or

9 spent nuclear fuel at a place outside 1 of the 50 States

10 or the District of Columbia.’’.

Æ
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1766

To amend the Utah School and Lands Improvement Act of 1993 to provide

for lands for the Goshute Indian Reservation, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 16, 1996

Mr. BENNETT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Utah School and Lands Improvement Act

of 1993 to provide for lands for the Goshute Indian

Reservation, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF CERTAIN UTAH STATE LANDS TO

4 GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION.

5 The Utah Schools and Lands Improvement Act of

6 1993 (107 Stat. 995 et seq.) is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating section 11 as section 12;

8 and

9 (2) by inserting after section 10 the following

10 new section:
2

•S 1766 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 11. ADDITIONAL GOSHUTE INDIAN RESERVATION

2 LANDS.

3 ‘‘(a) FURTHER ADDITIONS TO GOSHUTE RESERVA4 TION.—

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the lands re6 ferred to in section 3, for the purpose of securing in

7 trust for the Goshute Indian Tribe certain additional

8 public lands and lands belonging to the State of

9 Utah, which comprise approximately 8,000 acres of

10 surface and subsurface estate, as generally depicted

11 on the map entitled ‘Additional Utah-Goshute Ex12 change’, dated July 1, 1994, such public lands and

13 State lands are hereby declared to be part of the

14 Goshute Indian Reservation in the State of Utah.

15 ‘‘(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The declaration under

16 paragraph (1) shall become effective upon—

17 ‘‘(A) the completion of conveyance of the

18 State lands from the State of Utah; and

19 ‘‘(B) the acceptance of title by the United

20 States.

21 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION.—

22 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2),

23 the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire

24 through exchange the lands and interests in land

25 that are owned by the State of Utah, as described

26 in subsection (a)(1).
3

•S 1766 IS

1 ‘‘(2) VALID EXISTING RIGHTS.—Any lands and

2 interests in land acquired under paragraph (1) shall

3 be subject to valid existing rights.

4 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION OF OTHER PROVISIONS.—

5 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para6 graph (2), the remaining provisions of this Act that

7 are applicable to lands designated for transfer to the

8 Goshute Indian Tribe pursuant to section 3 shall

9 apply to the lands subject to this section.

10 ‘‘(2) COSTS OF APPRAISAL.—The Goshute In11 dian Tribe shall be responsible for payment of the

12 costs of appraisal of the lands designated for acqui13 sition pursuant to this section. The costs referred to

14 in the preceding sentence shall be paid before the

15 transfer of the lands.’’.

Æ