alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Herman Hope LIVINGSTON, Plaintiff in Error, v. STATE of Oklahoma, Defendant in Error.

No. A-12041.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

Oct. 20, 1954.

i James H. Mathers, Coalgate, for plaintiff in error.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., Sam H. Lattimore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant in error.

JONES, Judge.

Herman Hope Livingston was convicted in the County Court of Coal County for the alleged offense of driving an automobile on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and his punishment was assessed at 30 days in jail and a $100 fine.

On appeal complaint is made of the verdict of the jury which reads as follows:

> “We, the Jury duly drawn, empaneled and sworn in the above entitled cause, do upon our oaths, find the defendant Guilty as charged in the Information and assess his punishment at $100.00 Dollar fine, 30 days in jail. We, the Jury, recomend that the defendant has a family, be released at 8:00 o’clock, A.M. 24th of Dec. & report to sheriff night & morning & returned to jail at 8 A.M. 26th of complete time.

> “Dated this the 3 day of December, 1953.

> “O. L. Martin, Foreman”

In connection with said complaint counsel for the defendant states that there is no copy of the judgment pronounced by the trial court on the verdict in the casemade and that it is impossible to determine whether the trial court attempted to follow the verdict of the jury. The Attorney General answered the brief of the defendant by asking this court to dismiss the appeal for the reason the casemade contains no copy of the judgment of the trial court and therefore this court acquires no jurisdiction of the purported appeal.

In the case of Thornton, v. State, 86 Okl.Cr. 394, 193 P.2d 609, 610, and many other cases, this court has held:

> “Where an appeal is taken from an alleged judgment of conviction, and the transcript of the record or case-made contains no copy of the judgment of the trial court, this Court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal, and such appeal will be dismissed.”

An examination of the casemade fails to disclose a copy of the judgment of the trial court. By reason of the foregoing authorities, the motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.

POWELL, P. J., and BRETT, J., concur.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  TRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATION
  California
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    333-126538
(Commission File Number)
    
    33-0356705
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 7711 Center Avenue, Suite 100
Huntington Beach, California 92647
 (714) 373-8300
 
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02(d), (e) Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.SIGNATURES    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02(d), (e) Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  TRIAD FINANCIAL CORPORATIONDate: August 14, 2007
    /s/ Timothy M. O'ConnorName:
    Timothy M. OConnorTitle:
    Senior Vice President
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 8.2



                       [BEST & FLANAGAN PLLP LETTERHEAD]



                                October 28, 1996


Aequitron Medical, Inc.
14800 28th Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota


        Re:     Proxy Statement of Aequitron Medical, Inc. and Prospectus of
                Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated


Ladies and Gentlemen:

        We have acted as counsel to Aequitron Medical, Inc. ("Aequitron") in
connection with the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration
Statement") of Nellcor Puritan Bennett Incorporated ("NPB") which includes the
Proxy Statement of Aequitron and Prospectus of NPB (the "Proxy
Statement/Prospectus"). Unless otherwise indicated, any defined terms used
herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Proxy
Statement/Prospectus. In rendering this opinion, we have relied upon letters
delivered to us by NPB, Aequitron and affiliates of NPB and Aequitron
containing certain representations relevant to this opinion. We hereby confirm
that the discussion under the caption "The Merger - Certain Federal Income Tax
Consequences" in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus expresses our opinion as to the
material federal income tax consequences to NPB, Aequitron and the Aequitron
shareholders with respect to the Merger, as long as the Merger is effected in
accordance with the terms of that certain Amended and Restated Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of September 9, 1996 and amended as of October 21,
1996 by and between NPB and Aequitron.

        We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the use of our name under the caption "The Merger
- Certain Federal Income Tax Consequences" in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
In providing this consent, we do not thereby admit that we are in the category
of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.


                                     Very truly yours,

                                     
                                     Best & Flanagan
                                     Professional Limited Liability Partnership
EXHIBIT 31.1











CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Stephen Brock, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A, Amendment No. 1, of Public Company Management Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 33-8238;



c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  February
15, 2005

By: /s/ Stephen Brock



Stephen Brock,

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFVICE PRESIDENT, FINANCECALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2007PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I am the Vice President, Finance of CallistoPharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). I amdelivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q”).

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Date: August 14, 2007 |                      |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                       | /s/ BERNARD F. DENOYER    |
|                       | Bernard F. Denoyer        |
|                       | *Vice President, Finance* |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05625]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending January 17, 2015

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 302. 201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2007-0066.
    Date Filed: January 14, 2015.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: Feburary 4, 2015.
    Description: Application of Hainan Airlines Co., Ltd. (``Hainan 
Airlines'') requesting that the Department amend its foreign air 
carrier permit to enable Hainan Airlines to engage in scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property and mail between Shanghai, People's 
Republic of China (PVG), on the one hand, and Boston, Massachusetts 
(BOS), on the other hand. Hainan Airlines also requests exemption 
authority to the extent necessary so that it may exercise the rights 
requested in this application prior to the issuance of an amended 
foreign air carrier permit.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2015-05625 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification Pursuant to
                   18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                   as Adopted Pursuant to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


          In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Myoffiz, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Chang, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant
to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                              By   /s/  Michael Chang
                                 --------------------
                              Michael Chang
                              Chief Financial Officer


March 14, 2004
#####  

**Exhibit 31**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer				Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act				As Adopted Pursuant to				Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

			I, Atsushi Maki, certify that:

-  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Amanasu Environment Corporation; 
-  					Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a					material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,					in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading					with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;				 
-  					Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included					in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,					results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented					in this annual report;				 
-  					I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures					(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:				 
							Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material							information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,							is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the							period in which this annual report is being prepared;						
							Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and						
							Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

-  					I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors					and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the					equivalent function):				 
							All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls							which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,							summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's							auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and						
							Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees							who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and						

-  					I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant					changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect					internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including					any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.				 

 Dated: May 19, 2009
' • 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0641
ROBERT L. ALLUM,

Plaintiffand Appellant,

v. STATE OF MONTANA,

Defendant and Appellee. 

### MAR 0 8 2022 Bovven Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court qtate rif Montana ORDER

Representinghimself, RobertL.Allum movesthisCourttorecusefor cause: Justice McKinnon, Justice Rice, Justice Baker, Justice Shea, Justice Sandefur, and Justice Gustafson. Through counsel, the State ofMontana has filed a response in opposition. Allum contends that the Justices ofthis Court "have a history ofdenying Allum's constitutional rights to due process, and exceed their constitutional authority, on multiple occasionsH" He provides the list of his prior proceedings with this Court and their outcomes, concluding that he "cannot receive a fair and impartial hearing, before the Justices." Allum requests that the Justices recuse themselves. The State responds that Allum's motion fails to set forth any legaljustification for the recusal or disqualification of these Justices. The State points out that the only commonality in this Court's prior decisions is due to these six Justices' "history ofruling against [Allum]." The State posits that Allum's relief is untenable and has no basis in statute, case law, or rule. The State concludes that Allum's motion should be denied because Allum has provided no legal grounds for recusal. Allum's motion is not well-taken. We conclude that the State correctly pointstothe lack of any legal reason for recusal for cause. Allum seeks a different outcome in his instant proceeding, based uponhis prior history with this Court and its decisions. "Ajudge shall hear and decidematters assigned tothejudge,except when disqualification isrequired 03/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0641by Rule 2.12 or other law." Reichert v. State, 2012 MT 111, ¶ 49, 365 Mont. 92,

278 P.3d 455 (quoting Mont. Code ofJud. Cond. 2.7). Allum's motion is without merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Allum's "Motion to Recuse Justices Laurie McKinnon, James A.Rice, Beth Baker, Jim Shea, [Dirk] Sandefur, and Ingrid Gustafson, for Cause[,]" is DENIED. The Clerk ofthe SupremeCourt is directed to provide a copy ofthisOrder to counsel ofrecord and to Robert L. Allum personally. DATED this day ofMarch, 2022.

ChiefJustice

Justices
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 19, 2019

NO. 03

- 17

- 00504

- CR

Troy Anthony White, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, J USTICES GOODWIN AND KELLY MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment s of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court ho lds that there was no error in the c ourt’s

judgment s requiring reversal

. However, there was error in the judgment s that requires

correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment s of conviction to reflect that

the “Statute for Offense” is “22.021(a)(1)(B), (f)(1) Penal C ode.” The judgment s , as modified

,

are affirmed

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in

the court below.
Exhibit 99.1







Certification





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Mission Broadcasting of Wichita Falls, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: May 28, 2003 |  |  |  | /S/ DAVID S. SMITH                                                                                  
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  | David S. Smith                                                                                      
|                    |  |  |  | President and Treasurer (principal executive officer and principal
financial and accounting officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 4.25
 13 June 2008
Mr Russell Chenu
Chief Financial Officer
James Hardie Industries NV 
Atrium, 8th Floor 
Strawinskylaan 3077
1077ZX Amsterdam 
The Netherlands 
Ms Leigh Sanderson
Deputy Director General 
Department of Premier & Cabinet
Governor Macquarie Tower
1 Farrer Place
Sydney NSW 2000
Mr Bruce Potts
Director
James Hardie 117 Pty Ltd (Performing Subsidiary)
Level 3, 22 Pitt Street
Sydney NSW 2000
    
    Asbestos Injuries Compensation
Fund Limited
ACN 117 363 461
Suite 1, Level 7
233 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
PO Box A962
Sydney South NSW 1235
DX 11548, Sydney Downtown
Telephone: (02) 9277 6600
Facsimile: (02) 9277 6699
  NOTICE  Address for Service of Notices on Trustee
   Name:
    
    Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund LimitedAttention:
    
    The Chief Executive OfficerAddress:
    
    Suite 1, Level 7, 233 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000Facsimile:
    
    +61 2 9277 6699.
 
 /s/ Peter W. BakerPeter W BakerChairman
Summary of Analytical Results

662 - December 2011

Sample ID 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB

Date 12/5/11 12/12/11 12/19/11 12/26/11

Top (ft) 0 0 0 0

Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 0 0 0 0

Analyte units Diss. (D) Duplicate # 1 1 1 1

PFOA ug/L T 3.30 5.20 2.13 3.65

 The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072.

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid

ug/L = micrograms per Liter

 represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 12/12/11.

 collected on 12/12/11 represents the average of lab duplicate results.

 Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1

0900006480fc8948.xls:Sheet1

2/29/2012 11:28 AM
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-QSB
Donar Enterprises, Inc.
File No. 000-49649

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Donar  Enterprises,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
P. Halter,  Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 9, 2005                                 By:    /s/ Timothy P. Halter
      -----------                                    ---------------------------
                                                               Timothy P. Halter
                                                     Chief Executive Officer and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Donar  Enterprises,  Inc. and will be retained by Donar Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.