alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued October 25, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-11-00743-CR

———————————

LONNIE WEBSTER ROBERTSON, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court 

Chambers County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 26786

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury convicted appellant of the offense of assault with bodily injury and 

assessed punishment of confinement for 270 days. Appellant, proceeding pro se,

timely appealed. The court reporter has informed the Court that appellant has 
2

neither paid nor made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

On June 22, 2012, the Court abated the appeal and remanded the case to the 

trial court for a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to pursue the appeal 

and, if so, to determine whether appellant is indigent and whether appellate counsel 

should be appointed. The trial court conducted a hearing and filed findings in this 

Court.

The trial court found that, although appellant had been served with notice, he 

did not appear at the hearing. Appellant’s appointed trial counsel and the State’s 

attorney appeared. The trial court found that, on or about July 28, 2011, it had 

received testimony from appellant that he had the financial ability to retain 

counsel, but that appellant had not retained counsel. The trial court found that 

appellant “does not wish to prosecute the appeal.” 

In addition, appellant’s appointed trial counsel filed an affidavit in this 

Court, stating that he has spoken with appellant and that appellant does not wish to 

pay for a reporter’s record or pursue the appeal. 

Appellant has not filed a written motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.2(a). However, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the 

operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 42.2(a).
3

Accordingly, we reinstate and dismiss the appeal. We dismiss all other 

pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
#### Jamal BEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Terry DOE, Lansing Correctional Facility East Unit Aramark Manager; and C. Scheidecker, Clinical Chaplin for Lansing Correctional Facility East, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-3346.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2003.

Jamal Bey, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining Appellant’s brief and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is a *pro se*state prisoner 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights appeal. Mr. Bey filed this claim in the district court on behalf of himself and all Muslim and Moorish Science inmates. Mr. Bey sought immediate injunctive relief and damages, claiming that the Aramark food manager and the chaplain at the Lansing Correctional Facility were not complying with an agreement reached between inmates and prison officials regarding the food to be served during Ramadan. The district court found that the requirements for certification as a class action were not satisfied and declined to certify the claim and that Mr. Bey was the sole plaintiff in the action. The district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

After a thorough review of the brief and the record, we agree with the district court that Appellant has failed to exhaust the available formal grievance procedure on his claim. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s well-reasoned January 3, 2002, Or*507der, we hold that Mr. Bey may not proceed ■without first exhausting his administrative remedies.

The decision of the trial court is AFFIRMED. We remind Appellant that because his motion to proceed without prepayment of the appellate filing fee was granted, he must continue making partial payments on court fees and costs previously assessed until such have been paid in fuü.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

NICHOLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY, 

INC.,

Plaintiff,

AND

DOMINIC ROTELLA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Apellee.

______________________ 

2013-5101

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 12-CV-0364, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Case: 13-5101 Document: 27 Page: 1 Filed: 01/14/2014
2 NICHOLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT v. US

 Dominic Rotella moves for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis. Nichole Medical Equipment & Supply, Inc. has 

not responded to the court’s November 19, 2013 order.

Upon consideration thereof, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) Rotella’s motion for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis is granted. 

(2) The case will proceed only as to the pro se appellant. The revised official caption is reflected above. A copy 

of this order shall be transmitted to the merits panel.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

Case: 13-5101 Document: 27 Page: 2 Filed: 01/14/2014
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 2940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-00769]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2445-000]


Green Mountain Power Corporation; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

    The license for the Center Rutland Hydroelectric Project No. 2445 
was issued for a period ending December 31, 2023.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2445 is issued to 
Green Mountain Power Corporation for a period effective January 1, 
2024, through December 31, 2024, or until the issuance of a new license 
for the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes 
first. If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not 
take place on or before December 31, 2024, notice is hereby given that, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) 
of the FPA is renewed automatically without further order or notice by 
the Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Green Mountain Power Corporation is authorized to 
continue operation of the Center Rutland Hydroelectric Project under 
the terms and conditions of the prior license until the issuance of a 
subsequent license for the project or other disposition under the FPA, 
whichever comes first.

    Dated: January 10, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-00769 Filed 1-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Broadcasting,
Inc. (together, the Company), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                    
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2004 |  | /s/ PERRY A. SOOK                                                  
|                       |  | Perry A. Sook                                                      
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
----

----

I Akti, katerih objava je obvezna

----

UREDBA (ES) št. 1992/2006 EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA

z dne 18. decembra 2006

o spremembah Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 1408/71 o uporabi sistemov socialne varnosti za zaposlene osebe, samozaposlene osebe in njihove družinske člane, ki se gibljejo v Skupnosti

(Besedilo velja za EGP)

EVROPSKI PARLAMENT IN SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE STA –

ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 42 in 308 Pogodbe,

ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije,

ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora (1),

v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe (2),

ob upoštevanju naslednjega:

SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO:

Člen 1

Priloge I, II, IIa, III, IV in VI k Uredbi (EGS) 1408/71 se spremenijo v skladu s Prilogo k tej uredbi.

Člen 2

Ta uredba začne veljati tretji dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.

Točka 1(b) in točka 6(b) Priloge v zvezi z Nizozemsko se začneta uporabljati 1. januarja 2006, razen oddelka ”Q. NIZOZEMSKA”, točka 1(f), šesta alinea Priloge VI Uredbe (EGS) št. 1408/71, kakor je bil dodan s točko 6(b) Priloge k tej uredbi, ki se bo začel uporabljati z dnem, navedenim v dodstavku 1 tega člena.

Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.

V Strasbourgu, dne 18. decembra 2006.

Za Evropski parlament

Predsednik

J. BORRELL FONTELLES

Za Svet

Predsednik

J.-E. ENESTAM

----

(1)  Mnenje z dne 13. decembra 2006 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu)

(2)  Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. novembra 2006 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Sklep Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006.

----

PRILOGA

Priloge k Uredbi (EGS) št. 1408/71 se spremenijo:

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 OF

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF MAX CAPITAL GROUP LTD.

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and accompanies the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of Max Capital Group Ltd. (the Issuer).

I, Joseph W. Roberts, the Chief Financial Officer of Issuer, certify that:

(i) the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained
by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Dated: May 4, 2010



|             |  |                                                                       
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|             | 
|             |  | /s/ Joseph W. Roberts                                                 
|Name: Title: |  | Joseph W. Roberts Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
• V • ! 

### SERVED : DECEMBE R16 , 201 1 U.S . DI?.PAR'I'MF.N

T O FTRANSPORTATIO N • •rri<''^ f nppjA^^ OFFIC E O FHFARFNG S ^ ' " " ' '^^''^'"^'^^ o WASHINGTON , DC /Oi l tlF C | qA 9 : U

K I N TH FMATTERO F BRIC E E.THOMPSO N "A A DOCKE T NO . |T 0 B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-201I-III 9 NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designate da s Cas e No . 201 1 WP l 10014 ) lia s been assigne d to Administrativ e La

w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . All futur e pleading s andother communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve don th e Judge , the FA A Hearin g Docket , an

dthe othe r

person s on th e attache dServic e List .

Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t V_„^-^I^onni e A . Yoder

•Chie f Administrativ e Law<Iudg e /FDMSNo . FAA-201 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Bric e E . Thompson , Respunden i P.O . Bo x 1163 2 Reno , N V 8951 0 Lindsa y M . Nakamura , Complainan l ' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AWP-7.1 1 Western-Pacifi c Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles . C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-713 8 FAX : '310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . To

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, us

e ih e followin g address : Federa

l Avinlio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Allention ; Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .

_ ? _
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Bernard F. Denoyer, certify that:

1)    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2)    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



Date: November 15, 2010

/s/ BERNARD F. DENOYER Bernard F. Denoyer Senior Vice President, Finance


---
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed October 26, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-568

Lower Tribunal Nos. F05-11763B; F05-12003A; F05-11761B

________________

Samuel Wright,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa 

Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Samuel Wright appeals the trial court’s denial of his Rule 3.800 motion 

to correct sentencing error. Mr. Wright contends that the written sentence 
2

does not comport with his plea agreement, nor the trial court’s oral 

announcement made during the sentencing hearing that it accepted the 

agreement, in that it does not order that the sentences in Mr. Wright’s various 

cases be served concurrently. The State has confessed error, and our 

independent review of the record indicates that Mr. Wright is entitled to relief. 

We therefore reverse the order on appeal and remand for the trial court to 

enter a sentencing order that reflects the mutual agreement of the parties.

Reversed and remanded.
----

            COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1929/2006

of 23 October 2006         

concerning the implementation of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Community and Uruguay pursuant to Article XXIV.6 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994, amending Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex 7 of Section III of Part three (WTO quotas to be opened by the Competent Community authorities) of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 is hereby amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 23 October 2006.

For the Council

The President

J.-E. ENESTAM            

----

(1)OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1758/2006 (OJ L 335, 1.12.2006, p. 1).

(2)  See page 10 of this Official Journal.

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50648 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSÉ LUIS MUNOZ-LARA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-79-1

-------------------- April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * José Luis Munoz-Lara appeals his conviction and 60-month sentence for being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Munoz-Lara argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment because his prior deportation did not meet the basic standards of due process. Munoz-Lara acknowledges that the due process issue is foreclosed by United States v. BenitezVillafuerte , 186 F.3d 651 (5th Cir. 1999), cert. denied , 528 U.S.No. 00-50648 -2- 1097 (2000). He seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. He also contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is an element of the offense that must have been charged in the indictment. Munoz-Lara acknowledges that this argument also is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he again seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. Jan. 26, 2001)(No. 00-8299). As Munoz-Lara concedes, his arguments are foreclosed. His conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
No. 07

- 17

- 00329

- CV

In the Interest of C.S., G.M.S., J.C.S., J.S., and R.S., Children § § § § From the 287th District Court of Parmer County September 26, 2017 Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 26, 2017 , it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that this app eal be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis , no costs beyond those that have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o