T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HO VH AN E S VE R MANY AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71224 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 536- 419 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H ovha ne s V e rm a ny a n, ana t i ve of the f orm e rS ovi e tU ni on a nd c i t i z e n of A ze rbai j an, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) o r d e rd is m is s in g h is ap p e a l f r o m a n im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p l i cat i o n fo r w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al an drel i ef u n d er th e C o n v en t i o n A g ai n st 

# FI LED JU L 24 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71224 2 T ortur e ( “ C A T ” ) . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f or s ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e the a ge nc y ’ s f a c tua l f i ndi ngs , appl y i ng the ne w s t a nda r ds g o v e rn in g a d v e r s e c r e d ib ilityd e te rm in a tio n s c r e a te db yth e R e a l I D A c t. Shr es tha v. H older , 5 9 0 F .3 d1 0 3 4 , 1 0 3 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . W e d e n yin p a rt a n dd is m is s in p a rt th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . W i th r e s pe c tt o pa s tha rm i n A z e rba i j a n, s ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i tyde t e rm i na t i on ba s e d on V e rm a ny a n’ s a s y l um ap p lic a tio n ’s o m is s io n o f h is o n lyc la im o f

p e r s o n a l m is tr e a tm e n t in A z e rb a ija n . Se e i d. a t1039- 40. W i th r e s pe c tt o f utur e ha rm , s ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the a ge nc y ’ s c onc l us i on tha tV e rm a ny a n f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h ac l e a rpr obabi l i tyof p e r s e c u tio n in A z e rb a ijan o n a c c o u n t o f h is A rm e n ia n e th n ic ity . See T am an g v. H older , 59 8 F . 3d 10 83 , 10 94 -95 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). V erm anyan n ow cont ends there i s a p att ern o r p ract i ce o f p ersecu t i o n , an dth ath e w o u l db e si n g l edo u tas a me mb e ro f

ad i s f a v o r e dg r o up . W e l a c kj u r i s d i c t i o n t o c o n s i d e rth e s e c l a i ms b e c au s e V e rm a n y a n d idn o t r a is e th e m to th e B I A . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( no j uri sdi ct i on ov erl egal cl ai m s notpres ent ed be l ow ) . A c c or di ngl y , w e de nythe pe t i t i on a s t o V e rm a ny a n’ s w i thhol di ng of r e mo v a l c l a i m.09- 71224 3 F i nal l y, w e a l so l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s deni al of C A T re l i ef b e c au s e V e rm a n y a n d idn o t r a is e it to th e B I A . Se e id . P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.