alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary L. Dreher, certify that:     1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of AMDL, Inc. for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the small business issuer and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s firstfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:February 22, 2008   /s/ Gary L. Dreher   Gary L. Dreher  Chief Executive Officer
1 

### STATE OF VERMONT

SUPERIOR COURT ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION Environmental Division Unit Docket No. 120-8-14 Vte c

Arthaud CU 

### JUDGMENT ORDER

This is an appeal from a Town of Charlotte Zoning B oard of Adjustment (ZBA) decision denying conditional use approval for the demolition and reconstruction of a structure. The matter is now before the Court on Applicant’s withd rawal of the application and his motion for Dismissal with Prejudice. The Biebuycks are self-r epresented. Appellant Paul Arthaud is represented by Liam L. Murphy and Katelyn E. Ellerm an, Esqs. The Town of Charlotte, is represented by David W. Rugh, Esq.

Applicant Paul Arthaud no longer wishes to pursue t he Conditional Use application and withdraws the application. He understands that the ZBA decision denying conditional use approval is now final. The Biebuycks wish to conti nue this appeal.

When an applicant withdraws the application at issu e in our de novo review, the Environmental Division’s subject matter jurisdictio n ends. Additionally, the Environmental Division is without power to force an applicant to continue to pursue its application. While the Court is concerned that the practical effect of gra nting the motion to dismiss will be inefficient should a dispute underlying the subject property co ntinue, we have no authority to extend or continue our subject matter jurisdiction.

For this reason, the motion for Dismissal with Prej udice is **GRANTED** . As such the ZBA’s decision denying the conditional use approval appli cation is final. This concludes the matter.

So ordered.

**Electronically signed on July 17, 2017 at 2:22 PM p ursuant to V.R.E.F. 7(d).** 

_________________________________________ Thomas G. Walsh, Judge Superior Court, Environmental Division

Notifications: Liam L. Murphy (ERN 3953) and Katelyn E. Ellermann (ERN 6654), Attorneys for Appellant Paul
Arthaud David W. Rugh (ERN 1507), Attorney for Interested P erson Town of Charlotte
Interested Person Nina Cucchiari Interested Person Norman Ernsting Interested Person Valerie Biebuyck Interested Person J.C. Biebuyck Mediator Donald R.(Tad) Powers

nlow
<PAGE> 50

EXHIBIT 3.6

      CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                OF
                     WINDSTAR RESOURCES, INC.
                      An Arizona Corporation

     WINDSTAR RESOURCES, INC., a corporation formed under the
Arizona Corporate Code of the State of Arizona. 

     The undersigned, the President and the Secretary of WindStar
Resources, Inc.  Certify that at a shareholders meeting held on
April 15, 1998, and which was called for the purpose of amending
the Articles of Incorporation of WindStar Resources, Inc., an
appropriate majority of the holders of shares of each class
entitled to vote authorized the following amendment of Articles
V, Authorized Capital, of the Articles of Incorporation:

          The number of shares which the Corporation shall have
     authority to issue is 50,000,000 shares of common stock
     having a par value of $0.0001 per share and 10,000,000
     shares of preferred stock, having a par value of $0.0001 per
     share.  There shall be no other classes or shares of stock
     in the Corporation.  The Corporation shall have the right to
     purchase, take, receive or otherwise acquire, hold, own,
     pledge, transfer and dispose of its own shares, to the
     extent of both its restricted and unreserved capital
     surplus.

     Dated this 15th day of April, 1998.

                              WindStar Resources, Inc.

                              By:  /s/ Fred R.  Schmid
                                   Fred R.  Schmid, President

                              By:  /s/ Richard G.  Steeves
                                   Richard G.  Steeves, Secretary
#### In re Andrew F. WRIGHT, David C. Blakey, John E. Fitton, Leif Lindholm, Jan Holmgren, and Peter Lind.

No. 03-1049.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 8, 2003.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Andrew F. Wright et al. move without opposition to voluntarily dismiss their appeal 03-1049.

*568Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The unopposed motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alvin ATWATER, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 02-50256.

D.C. No. CR-00-00315-ABC-1.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2002.*

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alvin Atwater, Jr. appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to one count of making a false statement in the acquisition of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(6). Atwater contends that the district court abused its discretion by denying him a downward departure to account for the disparity between federal and state penalties for making a false statement on a firearms application. We lack jurisdiction because the district court stated expressly that it was denying the departure in its discretion. *United States v. Romero,*293 F.3d 1120, 1126-27 (9th Cir.2002). This appeal is

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *464courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Honeywell

101 Columbia Road Morristown, NJ 07962

M s. Drusilla Hufford Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Penns yl vania Avenue, N W MC 6205J Wa shington, DC 20460 June 2 2 , 2011 Subject: SNAP EPA- HQ - OAR 2008 - 0664 HFO - 1234yf LGW P MAC Refrigerant Industrial Transfer Dear Drusilla It was nice to meet yo ur team last week, thank s to all for taking time to discuss commercial introduction of HFO - 1234y

f refrigerant for mobile air conditioning. The pace towards full production is rapidly accelerating as we look to support our MAC customers around the globe. Expedient movement of the refrigerant to the various global regions is critical the operation of our business and the successful implementation of this new lower global warming refrigerant. We need to move HFO - 1234y f today for industrial transfers but vitally need EPA non - objection to allow use of other than the SAE J2844 service cylinder fitting. W e would appreciate your agreement with our interpretation that such shipments would not conflict with the intent of the SNAP ruling. Honeywell needs to mo ve m aterial immediately both internal inventory transfers and to support customer production activities. These shipments are not for “professional service or service for consideration” usage. During our discussion we briefly addressed HFO - 1234yf SNAP Final R ule EPA- HQ - OAR- 2008 - 0664 and the SAE J2844 quick connect fitting standard referencing professional service c yl inder fittings. From our discussion, it is our understanding that the SNAP reference relates to “professional service or service for consideratio n” when identifying a specific fitting. Therefore, any industrial transfer either inte rnal to Honeywell or to a non - professional service usage would be excluded from the fitting requirement. It is this last point that we need immediate clarification to al low movement of refrigerant. Please provide a response indicating your agreement with our desire to utilize standard industry fillings for ma terial transfers for industrial usage. Thank you for your assistance, I look forward to your feedback. As we d iscussed at the meeting, please communicate directly with me at Steven.Bernhardt@Honeywell.com or ( 973 ) 455 - 6294

. Thanks, Steven H. Bernhardt, PhD Global Director Regulatory Affairs Honeywell Intern ational 101 Columbia Road, NIC - 5 Morristown, NJ 07962 cc. Cindy Newberg Margaret Sheppard Yaidi Cancel
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1674

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the applicability

of the first-time farmer exception.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 16, 1996

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. PRESSLER, and Mr. BAUCUS) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand

the applicability of the first-time farmer exception.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF FIRST-TIME FARMER EXCEP4 TION.

5 (a) ACQUISITION FROM RELATED PERSON AL6 LOWED.—Section 147(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code

7 of 1986 (relating to exception for first-time farmers) is

8 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara9 graph:
2

•S 1674 IS

1 ‘‘(G) ACQUISITION FROM RELATED PER2 SON.—For purposes of this paragraph and sec3 tion 144(a), the acquisition by a first-time

4 farmer of land or personal property from a re5 lated person (within the meaning of section

6 144(a)(3)) shall not be treated as an acquisition

7 from a related person.’’

8 (b) SUBSTANTIAL FARMLAND DEFINITION MODI9 FIED.—Clause (i) of section 147(c)(2)(E) of the Internal

10 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining substantial farmland) is

11 amended by striking ‘‘15 percent of the median’’ and in12 serting ‘‘30 percent of the average’’.

13 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of

15 the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 99.1





Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of
Bastet Broadcasting, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |    
|------------------- |  | ---
|                   
|Dated: May 28, 2003 |  | By:
|                    |  |    



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1716

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the adolescent family

life program, provide for abstinence education, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 29, 1996

Mr. SPECTER (for himself, Mr. SANTORUM, Mr. JEFFORDS, Mr. LUGAR, Mr.

INOUYE, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. HATFIELD, Mr. COATS, Mr.

STEVENS, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. BOND, Mr. CONRAD, and Mr. DEWINE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the

adolescent family life program, provide for abstinence

education, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adolescent Family Life

5 and Abstinence Education Act of 1996’’.
2

S 1716 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

2 Section 2002(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42

3 U.S.C. 300z–1) is amended in subparagraph (4)(G) by in4 serting ‘‘and abstinence’’ after ‘‘adoption’’.

5 SEC. 3. GEOGRAPHIC DIVERSITY.

6 (a) Section 2005 of the Public Health Service Act

7 (42 U.S.C. 300z–4) is amended by adding after subsection

8 (a) the following:

9 ‘‘(b) In approving applications for grants for dem10 onstration projects for services under this title, the Sec11 retary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, ensure

12 adequate representation of both urban and rural areas.’’.

13 (b) Section 2005 is amended by redesignating sub14 sections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respec15 tively.

16 SEC. 4. SIMPLIFIED APPLICATION PROCESS.

17 Section 2006 of the Public Health Service Act (42

18 U.S.C. 300z–5) is amended by adding the following:

19 ‘‘(g) The Secretary shall develop and implement a

20 simplified and expedited application process for applicants

21 seeking less than $15,000 of funds available under this

22 Act for a demonstration project.’’

23 SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

24 Section 2010(a) of the Public Health Service Act is

25 amended to read as follows:
3

S 1716 IS

1 ‘‘(a) For the purpose of carrying out this title (42

2 U.S.C. 300z et seq.), there are authorized to be appro3 priated $75,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1996

4 through 2000.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of the
registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Form
10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the registrant.

Date: May
10, 2005


Amanasu
Environment Corporation


/s/
Atsushi Maki
________________________
Atsushi
Maki
CEO, CFO,
CAO
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE
                         CALLISTO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
                 FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2004
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I am the Vice President, Finance of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"). I am delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 and filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained
in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 27, 2004

                                                      /s/ Bernard F. Denoyer
                                                      ----------------------
                                                      Bernard F. Denoyer
                                                      Vice President, Finance
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

d0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

139829 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139829 

 COA: 293047 

Wayne CC: 08-004381-FC 

ANDRE LE ROBINSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1





                           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                           -------------------------------

      [Letterhead of KPMG Accountants N.V., A Member of KPMG International]


     We have issued our report dated April 9, 1999, accompanying the
financial statements of  Trimol Group, Inc., for the year ended December 31,
1999, to be contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the "10-KSB") for
Trimol Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") for its fiscal
year ended December 31, 1998. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the 10-KSB and to the use of our name as it appears therein.


                                        /s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.
                                        ---------------------------

                                        April 11, 2000
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Eric L. Mersch, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents
in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZipRealty, Inc.



|                      |     |                        
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------
|Date: August 10, 2012 | By: | /s/    Eric L. Mersch  
|                      |     | Eric L. Mersch         
|                      |     | Chief Financial Officer
#### Hartzel Ray FOSTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Howard PAINTER, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7784.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 16, 2003.

Decided Jan. 27, 2003.

Hartzel Ray Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Silas Bent Taylor, Deputy Attorney General, Dawn Ellen Warfield, Office of the Attorney General of West Virginia, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Hartzel Ray Foster appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Foster v. Painter,*No. CA-99-48-2 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             May 15, 2008
    
    By  /s/  Kent W. Peters
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDate
    
    Kent W. Peters
    
    (principal executive officer)
Regulator)' EYaluation 

Docket No. FAA-)otC: -oot,f Directorate ldcntilicr: 

li '''''''!"~'·,)uti!?<''' roth,· r,Iiucs mrlh' luN,, /1,-/mi·. ynumml <"11.\11!"(' Jh,· futu/.1 IIJ!d«h' d1 ("linlin.'.!.h I! 

1/h '\ · , In lint. i !i. ·k 1' 'I" I uh 1 into /Ill< II ih'll 11111 o/ I fl,• , 11ull/.!,< •d cd/. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per llroduct (e.g .. ai1·cmn. engine. 

(c .g .. I nspcction. I propeller. apnliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost n.:p!aCL'"!\lent) (include cost (labor+ u.s. !Or U.S. Fleet /Jo rwf i11d11de oncom/ilion t·osts here acccs~. testing. (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and c!osc-upl our) Products 

Order and install 

replacement cross 1.0 so 1.307 

fitting per CSB 

1307 

-----____ j 

-------·-·~--··---·-·-·--·- ---- --------------------.. -.... -

I 

I I ! I 

-

' 

' 

The known number of products in complia111.:c: 

Total Costs ofcon~[J!iancc for U.S. t1ect: $111.095 

Costs covered under wnrrantv (i/knmm) $ 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cos! Pans Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g .. hlSjk<.:tion. (indudc access. (@SRS/hour) 

r('p!accmcnt) testing. and closeUP) 

I I 

I 

I 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use lhix.fidd to exploi11 (111_1'fftin~ in 1he F.stimated Costs whle 

that \1'(/S (/,\SI/IIIed Ill" mi.!!, hi //()/ he oh\'ioux. 'lhis!idd Cll/111{.\'(/ be used/(} c.tpfnill \\'(//'/"11111_1' cos/s): The cost 0 r the 
labor and parts will be covered by CMI warranty. Estimated total labor is 2 hours. CMI warranty 

only covers one hour or labor. 

Executive Order I 2866: 

@ Could the AD be considered a "signi11cant regulatory action""? __ 

*[~planation; 

DOT H.cgulatOI)-' Policies and Pmcctlurcs: 

Is the AD signilicant'? 

* l~xplanat ion: 

"'"' . - Rcgulatot~' Flexibility Act: 

YES' D NO IZl 

YES' D NO IZl 

\Viii the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Y cs or No answer.~ 

YES 0 NO IZJ 

Explanation: 

lntnlsllltc Aviation in Alaslm: 

This AD could aiTcct intrasl<ltc aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

"""' aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation'? ~ 

YES' D NO IZl 

*Explanation: