Page 1 of 24

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Date: 7/24/2012

SUBJECT: Fenpropathrin Acute Aggregate Dietary (Food and Drinking Water) Exposure 

and Risk Assessment for the Section 3 Registration Action on the Tropical Fruits 

Guava, Acerola, Feijoa, Jaboticaba, Passionfruit, Starfruit, Wax Jambu, Lychee, 

Longan, Spanish Lime, Pulasan, Rambutan, Sugar Apple, Atemoya, Biriba, 

Cherimoya, Custard Apple, Ilama, and Soursop, and a Tolerance Without U.S. 

Registration on Tea

PC Code: 127901 DP Barcode: D402246

Decision No.: 417627 Registration No.: 59639-35

Petition: 9E7594 Regulatory Action: Section 3 Registration

Risk Assessment Type: Dietary Case No.: 7601

TXR No.: NA CAS No.: 39515-41-8

MRID No.: NA 40 CFR: §180.466

 

FROM: Douglas Dotson, Ph.D., Chemist

Risk Assessment Branch II

Health Effects Division (7509P)

THROUGH: Donna Davis, Chemist

Sheila Piper, Chemist

Dietary Exposure Science Advisory Council (DESAC)

TO: Laura Nollen/Barbara Madden, RM Team 5 

RIMUERB

Registration Division (7505P)

Executive Summary

An acute aggregate dietary (food and drinking water) exposure and risk assessment was

conducted using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model DEEM-FCIDTM, Version 2.03 which 

uses food consumption data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Continuing 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 2 of 24

Surveys of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) from 1994-1996 and 1998. The analyses were 

conducted as part of a human health risk assessment for the requested uses of the pyrethroid 

insecticide, fenpropathrin, on the tropical fruits guava, acerola, feijoa, jaboticaba, passionfruit, 

starfruit, wax jambu, lychee, longan, Spanish lime, pulasan, rambutan, sugar apple, atemoya, 

biriba, cherimoya, custard apple, ilama, and soursop. In addition, the registrant proposed a 

tolerance without U.S. registration on tea. These uses are being requested by the Interregional 

Research Project Number 4 (IR-4). Tolerances have already been established for the tropical 

fruits avocado, canistel, mango, papaya, salal, sapodilla, black sapote, mamey sapote, and star 

apple.

A chronic dietary exposure assessment was not performed because a chronic dietary endpoint 

was not selected for fenpropathrin. A chronic dietary endpoint is not required because repeated 

exposure to fenpropathrin does not result in a point of departure lower than that resulting from 

acute exposure. Therefore, the acute dietary risk assessment is protective of chronic dietary risk. 

An assessment for cancer was not performed because fenpropathrin was classified as “not likely 

to be carcinogenic to humans.” As a result, an acute assessment was the only dietary exposure 

assessment performed for fenpropathrin. 

The acute dietary endpoint selected for children is the same as that selected for adults. 

Decreased motor activity was observed in a motor activity study. The FQPA Safety Factor was 

reduced to 1x for adults; however, it was only reduced to 3x for children six years of age or 

younger. As a result, the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD) for children (0.017 mg/kg/day) 

is lower than that for adults (0.05 mg/kg/day). Initially, an unrefined assessment based on 

tolerance level residues and 100% crop treated assumptions was performed for fenpropathrin. 

There were no risks of concern for youth and adults; however, there were risks of concern for the 

population subgroups comprised of infants and children. As a result, the assessment was refined 

by incorporating distributions of field trial values, Pesticide Data Program (PDP) monitoring 

data, and estimates of percent crop treated. For most processed commodities, DEEM default 

processing factors were used for those commodities for which they were available. In some 

cases, empirical processing factors were used. For drinking water, a very conservative surface 

water estimated drinking water concentration (EDWC) generated with the FIRST Model was 

used. As a result of the fact that many conservative assumptions were made for this assessment, 

in particular, the use of field trial data (as opposed to monitoring data) for many commodities, 

HED is confident that the acute dietary exposure assessment significantly overestimates risk to 

the general U.S. population and all population subgroups.

The acute risk estimates are below HED’s level of concern for all population subgroups, 

including those comprised of infants and children. Generally, HED is concerned when risk 

estimates exceed 100% of the population-adjusted dose (PAD). The acute risk estimate for the 

general U.S. population is 19% of the aPAD. The population subgroup with the highest acute 

dietary risk estimate is Children 3-5, which uses 97% of the aPAD. As percent crop treated 

estimates were incorporated into the assessment, the risk estimates are being reported at the 

99.9th percentile of exposure.
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 3 of 24

I. Introduction

Dietary risk assessment incorporates both exposure and toxicity of a given pesticide. For acute 

and chronic assessments, the risk is expressed as a percentage of a maximum acceptable dose 

(i.e., the dose which HED has concluded will result in no unreasonable adverse health effects). 

This dose is referred to as the population-adjusted dose (PAD). The PAD is equivalent to the 

point of departure (POD, NOAEL, LOAEL, e.g.) divided by the required uncertainty or safety 

factors.

For acute and non-cancer chronic exposures, HED is concerned when estimated dietary risk 

exceeds 100% of the PAD. References which discuss the acute and chronic risk assessments in 

more detail are available on the EPA/pesticides web site: “Available Information on Assessing 

Exposure from Pesticides, A User’s Guide,” 21 Jun 2000, web link: 

http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/2000/July/Day-12/6061.pdf; or see SOP 99.6 (20 Aug

1999).

The most recent dietary exposure assessment performed for fenpropathrin was performed in 

2008 (D356137, A. Parmar, 11/26/2008). Then in 2011, HED performed a screening-level 

cumulative risk assessment for the pyrethroids and pyrethrins as a class (D394576, 10/4/2011, K. 

Whitby). This risk assessment included a dietary exposure analysis in which it was concluded 

that there were no dietary risks of concern for the pyrethroids and pyrethrins. 

II. Residue Information

HED has determined that the residue of concern in plant and animal commodities for risk 

assessment is parent fenpropathrin. Parent compound is also the residue of concern for risk 

assessment in drinking water.

Proposed Commodities

As stated above, the current tolerance petition includes the tropical fruits guava, acerola, feijoa, 

jaboticaba, passionfruit, starfruit, wax jambu, lychee, longan, Spanish lime, pulasan, rambutan, 

sugar apple, atemoya, biriba, cherimoya, custard apple, ilama, and soursop. In addition, the 

registrant proposed a tolerance without U.S. registration on tea. The recommended tolerances 

for the proposed commodities were used in the assessment. These tolerances are provided in 

Table 1, below.

Table 1. Fenpropathrin: Recommended Tolerances for Proposed Tropical Fruits and Tea

Commodity

Recommended 

Tolerance

(ppm)

Acerola, Feijoa, Guava, Jaboticaba, Passionfruit, Starfruit, Wax jambu 3.0

Longan, Lychee, Pulasan, Rambutan, Spanish lime 7.0

Atemoya, Biriba, Cherimoya, Custard apple, Ilama, Soursop, Sugar apple 1.5

Tea 2.0
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 4 of 24

Registered Commodities

For registered commodities, tolerances, distributions of field trial data, and distributions of 

monitoring data were used. The use of the various types of data is discussed below. At times it 

was necessary to translate data from certain commodities to other commodities. These data 

translations were performed according to the standard operating procedures (SOPs) that govern 

these translations. Field trial data were translated according to the guidance given in HED SOP 

2000.1: Guidance for Translation of Field Trial Data from Representative Commodities in the 

Crop Group Regulation to Other Commodities in Each Crop Group/Subgroup. Monitoring data 

were translated according to the guidance given in HED SOP 99.3: Translation of Monitoring 

Data.

Residue Point Estimates: Tolerances

Tolerances for fenpropathrin are established in 40CFR §180.466. In the analysis, tolerance level 

residues were used for commodities that did not contribute significantly to the risk estimates 

(i.e., were not “risk drivers”). Tolerance level residues were used for Chinese broccoli, kohlrabi, 

peas, eggplant, okra, peppers, tomatillo, blended tomato commodities, cantaloupe, casaba melon, 

honeydew melon, balsam pear, chayote fruit, Chinese waxgourd, pumpkin, citrus citron, citrus 

hybrids, citrus oil, lemons, limes, orange peel, pummel, crabapple, loquat, quince, boysenberry, 

dewberry, loganberry, currant, elderberry, gooseberry, avocado, canistel, cherimoya, cottonseed, 

grape leaves, dried mango, dried papaya, peanuts, mamey sapote, and all tree nuts.

Tolerance level residues were also used for livestock commodities. In the previous fenpropathrin 

risk assessment (D313330, D. Dotson, 11/26/2008), HED recommended in favor of reassessed 

tolerances for cattle, goat, hog, horse, and sheep commodities. HED recommended that the 

tolerance for the meat and meat byproducts of cattle, goats, horses, and sheep be reduced to 0.01 

ppm. HED recommended that the tolerance for the fat of these same commodities be reduced to 

0.05 ppm. HED recommended that tolerance for milk fat be reduced to 0.05 ppm (reflecting 

0.002 ppm in whole milk). Finally, HED recommended that the tolerances for hog commodities 

(fat, meat, and meat byproducts) be removed. The revisions have not been made to the 40CFR 

listing for fenpropathrin; however, HED reiterates the need for these changes and has included 

those reduced levels in this risk assessment. 

Residue Data Distributions

Residue distribution files (RDFs) were generated for the risk drivers. These RDFs were 

comprised of either field trial values or PDP monitoring values. Monitoring data were used 

when they were available. When they were not available, field trial values were used.

Field Trial Data

Distributions of field trial values were used for Brussels sprouts, cabbage, Chinese napa cabbage, 

tomatoes, cucumbers, grapefruit, apricots, cherries, nectarines, peaches, plums, blackberries, 

raspberries, mango, olive, and papaya. As stated above, field trial data were translated according 

to the guidance given in HED SOP 2000.1. Cabbage field trial data were translated to Brussels 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 5 of 24

sprouts and Chinese napa cabbage. Peach field trial data were translated to apricots and 

nectarines. Finally, avocado field trial data were translated to mango and papaya and guava field 

trial data were translated to passionfruit. Tropical fruits are not listed in SOP 2000.1. However, 

these fruits are all tropical fruits with inedible peel, and HED believes that these translations are 

appropriate.

PDP Data

Distributions of monitoring data values were used for broccoli, Chinese mustard cabbage, 

cauliflower, watermelon, squash, oranges, tangerines, apples, apple juice, pears, blueberries, 

huckleberries, grapes, grape juice, and strawberries. Monitoring data from the years 2007 

through 2010, inclusive, were used. As stated above, monitoring data were translated according 

to the guidance given in HED SOP 99.3. Broccoli PDP data were translated to Chinese mustard 

cabbage and cauliflower. Orange PDP data were translated to tangerines. Finally, blueberry

PDP data were translated to huckleberries. Bushberries are not listed in SOP 99.3. However, as 

blueberries and huckleberries are similar crops and are both in Crop Subgroup 13-07B 

(Bushberry subgroup), blueberry data were translated to huckleberries.

Residue Data for Blended Commodities

The acute residue input file includes the following blended commodities: dried bell pepper, 

dried nonbell pepper, tomato paste, tomato puree, dried tomatoes, pumpkin seed, dried tea, 

instant tea, peanuts, peanut butter, peanut oil, citrus oil, almond oil, filbert oil, cottonseed oil, 

olive oil, dried apple, dried pear, dried apricot, dried peach, and dried papaya. For all of these 

commodities, a point estimate was used as the residue value. In most cases, the point estimate 

was the tolerance. The average field trial value was used for dried apples, dried pears, and dried 

peaches. The average peach field trial value was translated to dried apricots. For these blended 

commodities, the percent crop treated estimates were entered directly into the Adjustment Factor 

2 column. Percent crop treated estimates were used for tomato paste, tomato puree, dried 

tomatoes, dried apples, dried pears, dried apricots, dried peaches, cottonseed oil, and olive oil.

The residue data discussed above are summarized in Attachment 3.

Processing Factors

The processing factors used in the analysis are provided in the previous dietary exposure 

assessment performed for fenpropathrin (D356137, A. Parmar, 11/26/2008). These same factors 

are being used in the current assessment.

The registrant performed processing studies on some of the commodities in the analysis. 

Empirical processing factors were used for citrus, grapes, melons, peanuts, apples, plums and 

tomatoes. When empirical processing factors were not available, default processing factors from 

DEEM (Version 7.81) were used. The DEEM default processing factors were used for dried 

apples, dried apricots, dried beef, dried papaya, dried peaches, dried pear, peanut butter, cherry

juice, papaya juice, and plum juice. Table 2 below lists the empirical processing factors and the 

DEEM 7.81 default processing factors that were used in the analyses. 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 6 of 24

Table 2: Processing Factors Used in Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure Assessment

Commodity Process Factor Reference

Apple Dried 8.0 DEEM 7.81 Default

Apricot Dried 6.0 DEEM 7.81 Default

Beef Dried 1.92 DEEM 7.81 Default

Cantaloupe Peeled 0.02 D257376

Cherry Juice 1.5 DEEM 7.81 Default

Citrus Juice 0.06 D257376

Citrus Peel Peeling 2.6 D257376

Grapes Raisins 1.54 D257376

Grapes Wine 0.003 D257376

Melons (except 

Watermelon)

Peeling 0.02 D257376

Papaya Dried 1.8 DEEM 7.81 Default

Papaya Juice 1.5 DEEM 7.81 Default

Peach Dried 7.0 DEEM 7.81 Default

Peanuts Refined Oil 4.0 D257376

Peanuts Peanut Butter 1.89 DEEM 7.81 Default

Pear Dried 6.25 DEEM 7.81 Default

Plum Juice 1.4 DEEM 7.81 Default

Plum Prune (Dried) 2.6 D333113

Tomatoes Washing 0.83 D257376

Tomatoes Juice 0.05 D257376

Tomatoes Paste 0.3 D257376

Tomatoes - Dried Washing x Drying 0.83 x 14.3 = 11.87 D257376 and DEEM 7.81

Residues in Fish

Fenpropathrin has a low water solubility and a high octanol/water partition coefficient. As a 

result, it will not dissolve in water to any significant extent. Residues have the potential to 

partition into sediment at the bottoms of water bodies, however. Catfish are bottom feeders and 

residues in catfish serve as a marker for pesticide residues. The USDA Pesticide Data Program 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 7 of 24

(PDP) monitored pesticide residues in catfish in 2008, 2009, and 2010. Over this 3-year period, 

PDP analyzed 1,458 samples of catfish for fenpropathrin residues. None of the samples 

contained detectable residues. As a result, residues in fish are not an important issue for 

fenpropathrin and were not included in the assessment. 

III. Percent Crop Treated Information

The Biological and Economic Analysis Division (BEAD) provided a Screening Level Usage 

Analysis (SLUA) for fenpropathrin (D402054, S. Haddad, 5/25/2012). The SLUA provided 

maximum percent crop treated estimates for commodities with established tolerances. The

percent crop treated estimates were used to prepare the RDFs for nonblended and partially 

blended commodities. For blended commodities, the percent crop treated estimates were entered 

directly in the Adjustment Factor #2 column in the DEEM input file. The SLUA is included in 

this dietary exposure memo in Attachment 5. Not all of the percent crop treated estimates in the 

SLUA were used in the assessment. The values that were used are given in Table 3, below.

Table 3. Maximum Percent Crop Treated Estimates Used in Acute Dietary Exposure Assessment

Commodity

Maximum

% Crop Treated Commodity

Maximum

% Crop Treated

Apples 15 Grapes 10

Apricots 2.5 Nectarines 2.5

Blueberries 2.5 Oranges 35

Broccoli 2.5 Peaches 2.5

Brussels Sprouts 10 Pears 10

Cabbage 2.5 Plums/Prunes 2.5

Cauliflower 2.5 Squash 2.5

Cherries 5 Strawberries 50

Cotton 2.5 Tangerines 15

Cucumbers 2.5 Tomatoes 10

Grapefruit 35 Watermelon 2.5

IV. Drinking Water Data

The Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) provided the results of a drinking water 

assessment that was performed for fenpropathrin (D368174, Jose Melendez, 4/26/2010). In this 

memo, EFED stated that the results of a previous assessment (D313331, J. Melendez, 9/3/2008)

should be used in the current dietary exposure analysis. Water numbers were based on parent 

only because the degradates occurred at low levels in the laboratory studies. The EFED memo 

of 9/03/2008 provided Tier 1 estimated environmental concentrations for fenpropathrin that were 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 8 of 24

calculated using the FIRST Model for surface water and the SCIGROW Model for groundwater. 

For surface water, the acute (peak) water concentration is 10.3 ppb. The groundwater screening 

concentration is 0.005 ppb. These values generally represent upper-bound estimates of the 

concentrations that might be found in surface water and groundwater resulting from the use of 

fenpropathrin on grapes, because this is the scenario that results in the highest estimated drinking 

water concentrations (EDWCs). For the acute dietary exposure assessment, the peak water 

concentration value of 10.3 ppb was used. The model and its description are available at the 

EPA internet site: http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/. 

V. DEEM-FCIDTM Program and Consumption Information

The fenpropathrin acute dietary exposure assessment was conducted using the Dietary Exposure 

Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity Intake Database DEEM-FCIDTM,Version 

2.03 which incorporates consumption data from USDA’s CSFII, 1994-1996 and 1998. The 

1994-96, 98 data are based on the reported consumption of more than 20,000 individuals over 

two non-consecutive survey days. Foods “as consumed” (e.g., apple pie) are linked to EPAdefined food commodities (e.g. apples, peeled fruit - cooked; fresh or N/S; baked; or wheat flour 

- cooked; fresh or N/S, baked) using publicly available recipe translation files developed jointly 

by USDA/ARS and EPA. For chronic exposure assessment, consumption data are averaged for 

the entire U.S. population and within population subgroups, but for acute exposure assessment 

are retained as individual consumption events. Based on analysis of the 1994-96, 98 CSFII 

consumption data, which took into account dietary patterns and survey respondents, HED 

concluded that it is most appropriate to report risk for the following population subgroups: the 

general U.S. population, all infants (<1 year old), children 1-2, children 3-5, children 6-12, youth 

13-19, adults 20-49, females 13-49, and adults 50+ years old.

For acute exposure assessments, individual one-day food consumption data are used on an 

individual-by-individual basis. The reported consumption amounts of each food item can be 

multiplied by a residue point estimate and summed to obtain a total daily pesticide exposure for a 

deterministic exposure assessment, or “matched” in multiple random pairings with residue values 

and then summed in a probabilistic assessment. The resulting distribution of exposures is 

expressed as a percentage of the aPAD on both a user (i.e., only those who reported eating 

relevant commodities/food forms) and a per-capita (i.e., those who reported eating the relevant 

commodities as well as those who did not) basis. In accordance with HED policy, per capita 

exposure and risk are reported for all tiers of analysis. However, for tiers 1 and 2, any significant 

differences in user vs. per capita exposure and risk are specifically identified and noted in the 

risk assessment.

VI. Toxicological Information

Adequate data have been submitted to characterize the toxicity of fenpropathrin for the purposes 

of dietary risk assessment. The acute dietary endpoint was based on decreased motor activity

seen in a motor activity study. A chronic dietary endpoint is not required because repeated 

exposure to fenpropathrin does not result in a lower point of departure. Therefore, the acute 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 9 of 24

endpoint is protective of chronic exposure scenarios. The FQPA Safety Factor was reduced to 

1x for youth and adults; however, it was reduced to 3x for children 6 years of age and under. 

The additional safety factor for children is based on the increased quantitative susceptibility seen 

in the scientific literature related to pyrethroid pharmacokinetics (D381210, E. Scollon and A. 

Lowit, 6/27/2011). In accordance with the EPA’s Final Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk 

Assessment (March, 2005), fenpropathrin was classified as “not likely to be carcinogenic to 

humans.” The fenpropathrin doses and endpoints for dietary exposure assessment are 

summarized in Table 4, below.

Table 4. Summary of Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Fenpropathrin

Exposure 

Scenario

Dose Used in Risk 

Assessment, UF

FQPA SF and LOC for Risk 

Assessment

Study and Toxicological 

Effects

Acute Dietary-

(≥ 6 years old)

Wolansky BMDL1SD = 

5.0 mg/kg

UF = 100

Acute RfD = 0.05 mg/kg

FQPA SF = 1X

aPAD = acute RfD

 FQPA SF

 

 = 0.05 mg/kg/day

Wolansky BMD1SD = 6.4 mg/kg

based on decreased motor 

activity

Acute Dietary-

(< 6 years old)

Wolansky BMDL1SD = 

5.0 mg/kg

UF = 100

Acute RfD = 0.05 mg/kg

FQPA SF = 3X

aPAD = acute RfD

 FQPA SF

 = 0.017 mg/kg/day

Wolansky BMD1SD = 6.4 mg/kg

based on decreased motor 

activity

Chronic Dietary A chronic dietary endpoint is not required because repeated exposure to fenpropathrin does not 

result in a lower point of departure. Therefore, the acute endpoint is protective of chronic 

exposure scenarios.

Cancer Classification: “not likely to be carcinogenic to humans” in accordance with the EPA Final 

Guidance for Carcinogen Risk Assessment (3/29/05) 

BMDL=Bench Mark Dose Level, 1SD=One Standard Deviation, UF = uncertainty factor, RfD = reference dose, 

aPAD = acute population adjusted dose

VII. Results/Discussion 

As stated above, for an acute dietary exposure assessment, HED is concerned when dietary risk 

exceeds 100% of the aPAD. The DEEM-FCIDTM analyses estimate the dietary exposure of the 

U.S. population and various population subgroups. The results reported in Table 5 are for the 

general U.S. Population, all infants (<1 year old), children 1-2, children 3-5, children 6-12, youth 

13-19, females 13-49, adults 20-49, and adults 50+ years. Risk estimates are below HED’s level 

of concern for the general U.S. population and all population subgroups. The acute risk estimate 

for the general U.S. population is 19% of the aPAD. The population subgroup with the highest 

acute risk estimate is Children 3-5, which uses 97% of the aPAD. A full listing of the exposure 

and risk estimates is included in Attachment 2.

Residues in drinking water made a negligible contribution to the risk estimates. 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 10 of 24

Table 5. Summary of the Acute Exposure and Risk Estimates for Fenpropathrin

Population 

Subgroup

Acute Assessment (99.9th Percentile) Chronic Assessment

aPAD, 

mg/day

Exposure Estimate, 

mg/day

% 

aPAD

cPAD, 

mg/day

Exposure Estimate, 

mg/day

% cPAD

U.S. Population 0.05 0.009489 19

NA NA NA

All infants 0.017 0.011457 67

Children 1-2 yrs 0.017 0.015343 90

Children 3-5 yrs* 0.017 0.016488 97

Children 6-12 yrs 0.05 0.013489 27

Youth 13-19 yrs 0.05 0.009290 19

Adults 20-49 yrs 0.05 0.007920 16

Adults 50+ yrs 0.05 0.008093 16

Females 13-49 yrs 0.05 0.008476 17

*Most highly exposed population subgroup

VIII. Characterization of Inputs/Outputs

HED considers the acute assessment to be partially refined, but at the same time, very healthprotective. Refinements were made to most of the risk drivers in the assessment; however, in 

many cases, these refinements consisted of the incorporation of field trial data. HED has learned 

from past experience that monitoring data are often significantly lower than field trial data. 

Monitoring data more accurately represent the residue levels to which people will actually be 

exposed to pesticide residues in their diets. In 2004, HED compared field trial and monitoring 

data for the pyrethroids permethrin, lambda cyhalothrin, and esfenvalerate. For those 

compounds, the monitoring data were one to two orders of magnitude lower than the field trial 

data for the same commodities. If monitoring data were available for more of the risk drivers, 

particularly stone fruits, raspberries, and blackberries, the risk estimates would have been 

considerably lower. The assessment is also conservative in that tolerance level residues were 

used for many commodities.

Percent crop treated estimates ranged from conservative to moderately refined. For many

commodities, the assumption was made that 100% of the crop would be treated. For other 

commodities, maximum percent crop treated estimates were incorporated. These estimates are 

based on past usage data and are considered to be very reliable. Percent crop treated estimates 

were not available for two of the risk drivers for children 1-6 years of age, raspberries and

blackberries. As a result, 100% crop treated was used for these commodities. If usage estimates

were available and had been used, the risk estimates for the population subgroups, Children 1-2 

and Children 3-5, would have been lower.

Processing factors also ranged from conservative to refined. DEEM default factors were used 

for some commodities whereas empirical processing factors were used for others. 

The risk estimates would be significantly lower if monitoring data were available for more of the 

risk drivers in the analysis. More monitoring data will be available in the future. The analysis 

could be refined further by incorporating percent crop treated estimates for new uses. However, 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 11 of 24

as all risk estimates are not of concern, it is not necessary to make any further refinements to the 

dietary exposure assessment at this time. 

IX. Conclusions

The exposure estimates that were generated are refined estimates of the actual dietary exposures 

that might occur. The acute aggregate (food + water) dietary risk estimates are below HED’s 

level of concern for the general U.S. population and all population subgroups. HED is confident 

that the assessment does not underestimate risk to the general U.S. population or any population 

subgroup.

X. List of Attachments

Attachment 1. Acute Dietary Residue Input File

Attachment 2. Results of Acute Dietary Exposure Assessment

Attachment 3. Residue Inputs for Individual Commodities

Attachment 4. Residue Distribution Files

Attachment 5. Screening Level Usage Analysis
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 12 of 24

Attachment 1: Fenpropathrin Residue Input File

Acute NOAEL: 5 mg/kg/day

Acute PAD: 0.05 mg/kg/day for Adults, Youth, and Children Over 6 Years of Age

Acute PAD: 0.017 mg/kg/day for Children 6 Years of Age and Under

DEEM-FCID Version 2.03

Filename: C:\Documents and Settings\ddotson\My Documents\DEEM 

FCID\Fenpropathrin\FenpropAcutePDP.R98

Date created/last modified: 06-10-2012/10:40:51/8

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RDL indices and parameters for Monte Carlo Analysis:

Index Dist Parameter #1 Param #2 Param #3 Comment

 # Code 

----- ---- ------------ -------- -------- -------

 1 6 ApplePDP15pct.RDF

 2 6 PearPDP10pct.RDF

 3 6 GrapePDP10pct.RDF

 4 6 CherryFT5pct.RDF

 5 6 PeachFT2.5pct.RDF

 6 6 PlumFT2.5pct.RDF

 7 6 BroccoliPDP2.5pct.RDF

 8 6 OrangePDP35pct.RDF

 9 6 BlueberryPDP2.5pct.RDF

 10 6 StrawberryPDP50pct.RDF

 11 6 GrapefruitFT35pct.RDF

 12 6 CaneberryFT100pct.RDF

 13 6 Apricot2.5pct.RDF

 14 6 CabbageFT2.5pct.RDF

 15 6 PapayaFT100PctCT.RDF

 16 6 TangerinePDP15Pct.RDF

 17 6 WatermelonPDP2.5pct.RDF

 18 6 OliveFT100PctCT.RDF

 19 6 TomatoFT10pct.RDF

 20 6 CucumberFT2.5PctCT.RDF

 21 6 SquashPDP2.5PctCT.RDF

 22 6 ChineseNapaCabbage.RDF

 23 6 ChineseMustardCabbage.RDF

 24 6 BrusselsFT10PctCT.RDF

 25 6 AppleJuicePDP15pct.RDF

 26 6 GrapeJuicePDP10pct.RDF

 27 6 GuavaFT100pct.RDF

 EPA Crop Commodity Name Def Res Adj.Factors RDL Comment

 Code Grp (ppm) #1 #2 Pntr

-------- ---- ------------------------------- ---------- ------ ------ --- -------

05010610 5A Broccoli 3.000000 1.000 1.000 7 

05010611 5A Broccoli-babyfood 3.000000 1.000 1.000 7 

05010620 5A Broccoli, Chinese 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

05010640 5A Brussels sprouts 3.000000 1.000 1.000 24 

05010690 5A Cabbage 3.000000 1.000 1.000 14 

05010710 5A Cabbage, Chinese, napa 3.000000 1.000 1.000 22 

05010720 5A Cabbage, Chinese, mustard 3.000000 1.000 1.000 23 

05010830 5A Cauliflower 3.000000 1.000 1.000 7 

05011960 5A Kohlrabi 3.000000 1.000 1.000 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 13 of 24

06012570 6A Pea, edible podded, succulent 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

06022550 6B Pea, succulent 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

06022551 6B Pea, succulent-babyfood 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

06022590 6B Pea, pigeon, succulent 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

08001480 8 Eggplant 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08002340 8 Okra 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08002700 8 Pepper, bell 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08002701 8 Pepper, bell-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08002710 8 Pepper, bell, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08002711 8 Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08002720 8 Pepper, nonbell 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08002721 8 Pepper, nonbell-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08002730 8 Pepper, nonbell, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08003740 8 Tomatillo 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

08003750 8 Tomato 1.000000 0.830 1.000 19 

08003751 8 Tomato-babyfood 1.000000 0.830 1.000 19 

08003760 8 Tomato, paste 1.000000 0.300 0.100 

08003761 8 Tomato, paste-babyfood 1.000000 0.300 0.100 

08003770 8 Tomato, puree 1.000000 0.830 0.100 

08003771 8 Tomato, puree-babyfood 1.000000 0.830 0.100 

08003780 8 Tomato, dried 1.000000 11.870 0.100 

08003781 8 Tomato, dried-babyfood 1.000000 11.870 0.100 

08003790 8 Tomato, juice 1.000000 0.050 1.000 19 

09010750 9A Cantaloupe 0.500000 0.020 1.000 

09010800 9A Casaba 0.500000 0.020 1.000 

09011870 9A Honeydew melon 0.500000 0.020 1.000 

09013990 9A Watermelon 0.500000 1.000 1.000 17 

09014000 9A Watermelon, juice 0.500000 1.000 1.000 17 

09020210 9B Balsam pear 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

09020880 9B Chayote, fruit 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

09021020 9B Chinese waxgourd 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

09021350 9B Cucumber 0.500000 1.000 1.000 20 

09023080 9B Pumpkin 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

09023090 9B Pumpkin, seed 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

09023560 9B Squash, summer 0.500000 1.000 1.000 21 

09023561 9B Squash, summer-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 21 

09023570 9B Squash, winter 0.500000 1.000 1.000 21 

09023571 9B Squash, winter-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 21 

10001060 10 Citrus citron 2.000000 1.000 1.000 

10001070 10 Citrus hybrids 2.000000 1.000 1.000 

10001080 10 Citrus, oil 75.000000 1.000 1.000 

10001800 10 Grapefruit 2.000000 1.000 1.000 11 

10001810 10 Grapefruit, juice 2.000000 0.060 1.000 11 

10001970 10 Kumquat 2.000000 1.000 1.000 

10001990 10 Lemon 2.000000 1.000 1.000 

10002000 10 Lemon, juice 2.000000 0.060 1.000 

10002001 10 Lemon, juice-babyfood 2.000000 0.060 1.000 

10002010 10 Lemon, peel 2.000000 2.600 1.000 

10002060 10 Lime 2.000000 1.000 1.000 

10002070 10 Lime, juice 2.000000 0.060 1.000 

10002071 10 Lime, juice-babyfood 2.000000 0.060 1.000 

10002400 10 Orange 2.000000 1.000 1.000 8 

10002410 10 Orange, juice 2.000000 0.060 1.000 8 

10002411 10 Orange, juice-babyfood 2.000000 0.060 1.000 8 

10002420 10 Orange, peel 2.000000 2.600 0.350 

10003070 10 Pummelo 2.000000 1.000 1.000 

10003690 10 Tangerine 2.000000 1.000 1.000 16 

10003700 10 Tangerine, juice 2.000000 0.060 1.000 16 

11000070 11 Apple, fruit with peel 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 

11000080 11 Apple, peeled fruit 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 

11000081 11 Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 

11000090 11 Apple, dried 0.770000 8.000 0.150 

11000091 11 Apple, dried-babyfood 0.770000 8.000 0.150 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 14 of 24

11000100 11 Apple, juice 5.000000 1.000 1.000 25 

11000101 11 Apple, juice-babyfood 5.000000 1.000 1.000 25 

11000110 11 Apple, sauce 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 

11000111 11 Apple, sauce-babyfood 5.000000 1.000 1.000 1 

11001290 11 Crabapple 5.000000 1.000 1.000 

11002100 11 Loquat 5.000000 1.000 1.000 

11002660 11 Pear 5.000000 1.000 1.000 2 

11002661 11 Pear-babyfood 5.000000 1.000 1.000 2 

11002670 11 Pear, dried 0.880000 6.250 0.100 

11002680 11 Pear, juice 5.000000 1.000 1.000 2 

11002681 11 Pear, juice-babyfood 5.000000 1.000 1.000 2 

11003100 11 Quince 5.000000 1.000 1.000 

12000120 12 Apricot 1.400000 1.000 1.000 13 

12000121 12 Apricot-babyfood 1.400000 1.000 1.000 13 

12000130 12 Apricot, dried 0.740000 6.000 0.025 

12000140 12 Apricot, juice 1.400000 1.000 1.000 13 

12000141 12 Apricot, juice-babyfood 1.400000 1.000 1.000 13 

12000900 12 Cherry 5.000000 1.000 1.000 4 

12000901 12 Cherry-babyfood 5.000000 1.000 1.000 4 

12000910 12 Cherry, juice 5.000000 1.500 1.000 4 

12000911 12 Cherry, juice-babyfood 5.000000 1.500 1.000 4 

12002300 12 Nectarine 1.400000 1.000 1.000 5 

12002600 12 Peach 1.400000 1.000 1.000 5 

12002601 12 Peach-babyfood 1.400000 1.000 1.000 5 

12002610 12 Peach, dried 0.740000 7.000 0.025 

12002611 12 Peach, dried-babyfood 0.740000 7.000 0.025 

12002620 12 Peach, juice 1.400000 1.000 1.000 5 

12002621 12 Peach, juice-babyfood 1.400000 1.000 1.000 5 

12002850 12 Plum 1.400000 1.000 1.000 6 

12002851 12 Plum-babyfood 1.400000 1.000 1.000 6 

12002860 12 Plum, prune, fresh 1.400000 1.000 1.000 6 

12002861 12 Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood 1.400000 1.000 1.000 6 

12002870 12 Plum, prune, dried 1.400000 2.600 1.000 6 

12002871 12 Plum, prune, dried-babyfood 1.400000 2.600 1.000 6 

12002880 12 Plum, prune, juice 1.400000 1.400 1.000 6 

12002881 12 Plum, prune, juice-babyfood 1.400000 1.400 1.000 6 

13010550 13A Blackberry 12.000000 1.000 1.000 12 

13010560 13A Blackberry, juice 12.000000 1.000 1.000 12 

13010561 13A Blackberry, juice-babyfood 12.000000 1.000 1.000 12 

13010580 13A Boysenberry 12.000000 1.000 1.000 

13011420 13A Dewberry 12.000000 1.000 1.000 

13012080 13A Loganberry 12.000000 1.000 1.000 

13013200 13A Raspberry 12.000000 1.000 1.000 12 

13013201 13A Raspberry-babyfood 12.000000 1.000 1.000 12 

13013210 13A Raspberry, juice 12.000000 1.000 1.000 12 

13013211 13A Raspberry, juice-babyfood 12.000000 1.000 1.000 12 

13020570 13B Blueberry 3.000000 1.000 1.000 9 

13020571 13B Blueberry-babyfood 3.000000 1.000 1.000 9 

13021360 13B Currant 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

13021370 13B Currant, dried 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

13021490 13B Elderberry 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

13021740 13B Gooseberry 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

13021910 13B Huckleberry 3.000000 1.000 1.000 9 

14000030 14 Almond 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14000031 14 Almond-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14000040 14 Almond, oil 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14000041 14 Almond, oil-babyfood 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14000590 14 Brazil nut 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14000680 14 Butternut 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14000810 14 Cashew 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14000920 14 Chestnut 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14001550 14 Filbert 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14001560 14 Filbert, oil 0.100000 1.000 1.000 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 15 of 24

14001850 14 Hickory nut 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14002130 14 Macadamia nut 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14002690 14 Pecan 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14002820 14 Pistachio 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

14003910 14 Walnut 0.100000 1.000 1.000 

21000440 M Beef, meat 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

21000441 M Beef, meat-babyfood 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

21000450 M Beef, meat, dried 0.010000 1.920 1.000 

21000460 M Beef, meat byproducts 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

21000461 M Beef, meat byproducts-babyfood 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

21000470 M Beef, fat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

21000471 M Beef,fat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

21000480 M Beef, kidney 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

21000490 M Beef, liver 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

21000491 M Beef, liver-babyfood 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

23001690 M Goat, meat 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

23001700 M Goat, meat byproducts 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

23001710 M Goat, fat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

23001720 M Goat, kidney 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

23001730 M Goat, liver 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

24001890 M Horse, meat 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

26003390 M Sheep, meat 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

26003391 M Sheep, meat-babyfood 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

26003400 M Sheep, meat byproducts 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

26003410 M Sheep, fat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

26003411 M Sheep, fat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

26003420 M Sheep, kidney 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

26003430 M Sheep, liver 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

27002220 D Milk, fat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

27002221 D Milk, fat - baby food/infant for 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000930 P Chicken, meat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000931 P Chicken, meat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000940 P Chicken, liver 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000950 P Chicken, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000951 P Chicken, meat byproducts-babyfoo 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000960 P Chicken, fat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000961 P Chicken, fat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000970 P Chicken, skin 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

40000971 P Chicken, skin-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003820 P Turkey, meat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003821 P Turkey, meat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003830 P Turkey, liver 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003831 P Turkey, liver-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003840 P Turkey, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003841 P Turkey, meat byproducts-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003850 P Turkey, fat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003851 P Turkey, fat-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003860 P Turkey, skin 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

50003861 P Turkey, skin-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

60003010 P Poultry, other, meat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

60003020 P Poultry, other, liver 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

60003030 P Poultry, other, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

60003040 P Poultry, other, fat 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

60003050 P Poultry, other, skin 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

70001450 P Egg, whole 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

70001451 P Egg, whole-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

70001460 P Egg, white 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

70001461 P Egg, white (solids)-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

70001470 P Egg, yolk 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

70001471 P Egg, yolk-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

86010000 O Water, direct, all sources 0.010300 1.000 1.000 

86020000 O Water, indirect, all sources 0.010300 1.000 1.000 

95000010 O Acerola 1.500000 1.000 1.000 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 16 of 24

95000200 O Avocado 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

95000740 O Canistel 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

95000890 O Cherimoya 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

95001280 O Cottonseed, oil 3.000000 1.000 0.025 

95001281 O Cottonseed, oil-babyfood 3.000000 1.000 0.025 

95001750 O Grape 5.000000 1.000 1.000 3 

95001760 O Grape, juice 5.000000 1.000 1.000 26 

95001761 O Grape, juice-babyfood 5.000000 1.000 1.000 26 

95001770 O Grape, leaves 5.000000 1.000 0.100 

95001780 O Grape, raisin 5.000000 1.540 1.000 3 

95001790 O Grape, wine and sherry 5.000000 0.003 1.000 3 

95001830 O Guava 1.500000 1.000 1.000 27 

95001831 O Guava-babyfood 1.500000 1.000 1.000 27 

95001920 O Jaboticaba 1.500000 1.000 1.000 

95002090 O Longan 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

95002110 O Lychee 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

95002120 O Lychee, dried 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

95002150 O Mango 1.000000 1.000 1.000 15 

95002151 O Mango-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 15 

95002160 O Mango, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

95002170 O Mango, juice 1.000000 1.000 1.000 15 

95002171 O Mango, juice-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 15 

95002350 O Olive 5.000000 1.000 1.000 18 

95002360 O Olive, oil 5.000000 1.000 1.000 

95002450 O Papaya 1.000000 1.000 1.000 15 

95002451 O Papaya-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 15 

95002460 O Papaya, dried 1.000000 1.800 1.000 

95002470 O Papaya, juice 1.000000 1.500 1.000 15 

95002520 O Passionfruit 1.500000 1.000 1.000 27 

95002521 O Passionfruit-babyfood 1.500000 1.000 1.000 27 

95002530 O Passionfruit, juice 1.500000 1.000 1.000 27 

95002531 O Passionfruit, juice-babyfood 1.500000 1.000 1.000 27 

95002630 O Peanut 0.010000 1.000 1.000 

95002640 O Peanut, butter 0.010000 1.890 1.000 

95002650 O Peanut, oil 0.010000 4.000 1.000 

95003330 O Sapote, Mamey 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

95003460 O Soursop 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

95003510 O Spanish lime 3.000000 1.000 1.000 

95003580 O Starfruit 1.500000 1.000 1.000 

95003590 O Strawberry 2.000000 1.000 1.000 10 

95003591 O Strawberry-babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 10 

95003600 O Strawberry, juice 2.000000 1.000 1.000 10 

95003601 O Strawberry, juice-babyfood 2.000000 1.000 1.000 10 

95003610 O Sugar apple 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

95003720 O Tea, dried 2.000000 1.000 1.000 

95003730 O Tea, instant 2.000000 1.000 1.000 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 17 of 24

Attachment 2: Results of Acute Dietary Exposure Assessment

DEEM-FCID Version 2.03 (1994-98 data)

Residue file: FenpropAcutePDP.R98

Residue file dated: 06-10-2012/10:40:51/8

Analysis Dates: 06-10-2012/10:53:47 (Adults)

 06-10-2012/10:48:49 (Infants and Children) 

Adjustment factor #2 used.

Daily totals for food and foodform consumption used.

MC iterations = 1000 MC list in residue file MC seed = 10

aPAD for Youth and Adults (>6 years of Age): 0.05 mg/kg/day

aPAD for Infants and Children (6 years of age and under): 0.017 mg/kg/day

===============================================================================

Summary calculations (per capita):

 95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile

Exposure % aRfD MOE Exposure % aRfD MOE Exposure % aRfD MOE 

---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- -------- ---------- ------- --------

U.S. Population:

 0.001758 3.52 2844 0.003745 7.49 1335 0.009489 18.98 526 

All infants:

 0.002466 14.51 2027 0.004525 26.62 1105 0.011457 67.40 436 

Children 1-2 yrs:

 0.002652 15.60 1885 0.006247 36.75 800 0.015343 90.26 325 

Children 3-5 yrs:

 0.002547 14.98 1963 0.005918 34.81 844 0.016488 96.99 303 

Children 6-12 yrs:

 0.001727 3.45 2894 0.004466 8.93 1119 0.013489 26.98 370 

Youth 13-19 yrs:

 0.001388 2.78 3603 0.002998 6.00 1667 0.009290 18.58 538 

Adults 20-49 yrs:

 0.001723 3.45 2901 0.003557 7.11 1405 0.007920 15.84 631 

Adults 50+ yrs:

 0.001578 3.16 3167 0.003327 6.65 1503 0.008093 16.19 617 

Females 13-49 yrs:

 0.001648 3.30 3033 0.003340 6.68 1496 0.008476 16.95 589 
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 18 of 24

Attachment 3. Residue Inputs for Individual Commodities

Commodity Blending 

Class.

Data Source RDF 

No.

Max.

%CT

Broccoli (and baby food) NB/PB PDP

(Broccoli: 2007, 2008)

7 2.5

Broccoli, Chinese NB Tolerance - 100

Brussels Sprouts PB FT (Cabbage) 24 10

Cabbage NB/PB FT (Cabbage) 14 2.5

Cabbage, Chinese napa NB/PB FT (Cabbage) 22 100

Cabbage, Chinese mustard NB/PB PDP

(Broccoli: 2007, 2008)

23 100

Cauliflower NB/PB PDP

(Broccoli: 2007, 2008)

7 2.5

Kohlrabi NB Tolerance - 100

Pea, succulent PB Tolerance - 100

Eggplant NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Okra NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Pepper, Bell (and baby food) NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Pepper, Bell - Dried (and baby food) B Tolerance - 100

Pepper, Nonbell (and baby food) NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Pepper, Nonbell - Dried B Tolerance - 100

Tomatillo NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Tomato (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Tomato) 19 10

Tomato paste B Tolerance - 10

Tomato puree B Tolerance - 10

Tomato – dried B Tolerance - 10

Tomato juice PB FT (Tomato) 19 10

Cantaloupe NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Casaba NB Tolerance - 100

Honeydew melon NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Watermelon and Watermelon juice NB PDP

(Watermelon: 2010)

17 2.5

Balsam Pear NB Tolerance - 100

Chayote, fruit NB Tolerance - 100

Chinese Waxgourd NB Tolerance - 100

Cucumber NB/PB FT (Cucumber) 20 2.5

Pumpkin NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Pumpkin seed B Tolerance - 100

Squash, summer (and baby food) NB/PB PDP (Squash: 2007, 2008) 21 2.5

Squash, winter (and baby food) NB/PB PDP (Squash: 2007, 2008) 21 2.5

Citrus citron NB Tolerance - 100

Citrus hybrids NB Tolerance - 100

Citrus oil B Tolerance - 100

Grapefruit and grapefruit juice NB/PB FT (Grapefruit) 11 35

Kumquat NB Tolerance - 100

Lemon (fruit, juice, juice baby food, and peel) NB/PB Tolerance - 100

Lime (fruit and juice) PB Tolerance - 100

Orange (fruit, juice, and juice baby food) NB/PB PDP (Orange: 2009, 2010) 8 35

Orange peel PB Tolerance - 35

Pummelo NB Tolerance - 100

Tangerine (fruit and juice) NB/PB PDP (Orange: 2009, 2010) 16 15

Apple (fruit and fruit baby food) NB/PB PDP (Apple: 2009, 2010) 1 15
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 19 of 24

Commodity Blending 

Class.

Data Source RDF 

No.

Max.

%CT

Apple – dried (and baby food) B Avg FT (Apple, 0.77 ppm) - 15

Apple juice (and baby food) PB PDP

(Apple Juice: 2007, 2008)

25 15

Apple sauce (and baby food) PB PDP (Apple: 2009, 2010) 1 15

Crabapple NB Tolerance - 100

Loquat NB Tolerance - 100

Pear (and baby food) NB/PB PDP (Pear: 2008, 2009) 2 10

Pear – dried B Avg FT (Pear) - 10

Pear juice (and baby food) PB PDP (Pear: 2008, 2009) 2 10

Quince NB Tolerance - 100

Apricot (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Peach) 13 2.5

Apricot - dried B Avg FT (Peach, 0.74 ppm) - 2.5

Apricot juice (and baby food) PB FT (Peach) 13 2.5

Cherry (and baby food) PB FT (Cherry) 4 5

Cherry juice (and baby food) PB FT (Cherry) 4 5

Nectarine NB FT (Peach) 5 2.5

Peach (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Peach) 5 2.5

Peach - dried (and baby food) B Avg FT (Peach, 0.74 ppm) - 2.5

Peach juice (and baby food) PB FT (Peach) 5 2.5

Plum (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Plum) 6 2.5

Plum, prune, fresh (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Plum) 6 2.5

Plum, prune – dried (and baby food) PB FT (Plum) 6 2.5

Plum, prune, juice (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Plum) 6 2.5

Blackberry PB FT (Black/Raspberry) 12 100

Blackberry juice (and baby food) PB FT (Black/Raspberry) 12 100

Boysenberry PB Tolerance - 100

Dewberry PB Tolerance - 100

Loganberry PB Tolerance - 100

Raspberry (and baby food) PB FT (Black/Raspberry) 12 100

Raspberry juice (and baby food) PB FT (Black/Raspberry) 12 100

Blueberry (and baby food) PB PDP

(Blueberry: 2007, 2008)

9 2.5

Currant and Currant – dried PB Tolerance - 100

Elderberry PB Tolerance - 100

Gooseberry PB Tolerance - 100

Huckleberry PB PDP

(Blueberry: 2007, 2008)

9 100

Tree nuts (almond (and baby food), brazil nut, 

cashew, chestnut, filbert, hickory nut, 

macadamia nut, pecan, pistachio, walnut)

PB Tolerance - 100

Tree nuts (butter nut) NB Tolerance - 100

Almond oil (and baby food) B Tolerance - 100

Filbert oil B Tolerance - 100

Beef (meat, meat-babyfood, meat byproducts, 

meat byproducts-babyfood, kidney, liver, liverbabyfood)

- Recommended Reassessed 

Tolerance

(0.01 ppm)

- 100

Beef, meat – dried - Recommended Tol. (0.01) - 100

Beef fat (and baby food) - Recommended Tol. (0.05) - 100

Goat (meat, meat byproducts, kidney, liver) - Recommended Tol. (0.01) - 100

Goat fat - Recommended Tol. (0.05) - 100
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 20 of 24

Commodity Blending 

Class.

Data Source RDF 

No.

Max.

%CT

Horse meat - Recommended Tol. (0.01) - 100

Sheep (meat, meat babyfood, meat byproducts, 

kidney, liver)

- Recommended Reassessed 

Tolerance (0.01 ppm)

- 100

Sheep fat (and baby food) - Recommended Tol. (0.05) - 100

Milk fat (and baby food) - Recommended Tol. (0.05) - 100

Chicken, Turkey, Poultry, other (all food forms) - Tolerance - 100

Egg - whole, white, yolk (and baby food) - Tolerance - 100

Water, direct and indirect, all sources - EFED Water Memo - -

Acerola NB Tol. (proposed) - 100

Avocado NB Tolerance - 100

Canistel NB Tolerance - 100

Cherimoya NB Tolerance - 100

Cottonseed oil (and baby food) B Tolerance - 2.5

Grape PB PDP (Grape: 2009, 2010) 3 10

Grape Juice (and baby food) PB PDP (Grape Juice: 2008) 26 10

Grape Leaves PB Tolerance - 10

Grape, raisin

Grape, wine and sherry

PB PDP (Grape: 2009, 2010) 3 10

Guava (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Guava) 27 100

Jaboticaba NB Tol. (proposed) - 100

Longan NB Tol. (proposed) - 100

Lychee NB Tol. (proposed) - 100

Lychee - dried B Tol. (proposed) - 100

Mango (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Avocado) 15 100

Mango, dried NB Tolerance - 100

Mango, juice (and baby food) PB Tolerance 15 100

Olive PB FT (Olive) 18 100

Olive Oil B Tolerance - 100

Papaya (and baby food) NB/PB FT (Avocado) 15 100

Papaya, dried B Tolerance - 100

Papaya, juice PB FT (Avocado) 15 100

Passionfruit NB FT (Guava) 27 100

Passionfruit, juice (and baby food) PB FT (Guava) 27 100

Peanut, Peanut Butter, and Peanut Oil B Tolerance - 100

Sapote, mamey NB Tolerance - 100

Soursop NB Tol. (proposed) - 100

Spanish Lime NB Tol. (proposed) - 100

Starfruit NB Tol. (proposed) - 100

Strawberry (and baby food)

Strawberry Juice (and baby food)

PB PDP

(Strawberry: 2008, 2009)

10 50

Sugar Apple NB Tol. (proposed) - 100

Tea, dried and instant B Tol. (proposed) - 100
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 21 of 24

Attachment 4: Residue Distribution Files

RDF #1

PDP Data

Apples 15%CT

TotalZ = 1251

TotalLOD = 176

LODRES = 0.0079

0.29

0.19

0.14

0.11

0.1

0.1

0.1

0.098

0.097

0.097

0.089

0.088

0.087

0.084

0.076

0.069

0.064

0.062

0.026

0.026

0.20

0.19

0.19

0.17

0.17

0.16

0.16

0.15

0.14

0.068

0.066

0.063

0.062

0.06

0.06

0.056

0.052

0.026

0.026

0.026

0.026

0.026

0.026

0.015

0.015

RDF #2

PDP Data

Pears PDP Data 10%CT

TotalZ = 1336

TotalLOD = 145

LODRES = 0.0185

0.61

0.52

0.47

0.062

RDF #4

Field Trial Data

Cherry FT Data 5%CT

TotalNZ = 12

TotalZ = 228

1.83

1.97

2.02

1.60

1.44

1.43

3.18

3.33

1.59

1.43

3.53

3.23

RDF #6

Field Trial Data

Plum FT Data 2.5%CT

TotalNZ = 11

TotalZ = 429

0.51

0.58

0.23

0.23

0.29

0.21

0.37

0.27

0.24

0.20

0.18

RDF #3

PDP Data

Grape PDP Data 10%CT

TotalZ = 1340

TotalLOD = 51

LODRES = 0.007885

RDF #5

Field Trial Data

Peach Field Trial Data 

2.5%CT

TotalNZ = 20

TotalZ = 780

0.66

0.66

0.76

0.63

0.56

0.73

0.91

1.11

1.05

1.01

0.69

0.72

0.79

0.67

0.61

0.54

0.39

0.49

1.00

0.84

RDF #7

PDP Data

Broccoli 2.5%CT

TotalZ = 1258

TotalLOD = 32

LODRES = 0.0078

RDF #8

PDP Data

Orange PDP Data 35%CT

TotalZ = 913

TotalLOD = 491

LODRES = 0.007051

RDF #9

PDP Data

Blueberries PDP Data 

2.5%CT

TotalZ = 1401

TotalLOD = 11

LODRES = 0.007573

1.3

1.2

0.87

0.59

0.43

0.32

0.27

0.20

0.19

0.14

0.14

0.092

0.077

0.074

0.065

0.060

0.026

0.026

0.026

0.026

0.38

0.37

0.29

0.24

0.17

0.21

0.20

0.19

0.17

0.16

0.15

0.14

0.13

0.12

0.12

0.12

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.096

0.094

0.092

0.086

0.083

0.066

0.066

0.065

0.065

0.065

0.060

0.060

0.059

0.057

0.057

0.056

0.053

0.053

0.053

0.052

0.050

0.048

0.047

0.046

0.045

0.043

0.040

0.038

0.035

0.034

0.031

0.031

0.029

0.028

0.028

0.024

0.021

0.020

0.020

0.020

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.57

0.16

0.16

0.14

0.12

0.12

0.11

0.098

0.09

0.089

0.081

0.075

0.07

0.055

0.053

0.053

0.05

0.043

0.043

0.04

0.038

0.036

0.036

0.033

0.033

0.031

0.031

0.028

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 22 of 24

RDF #10

PDP Data

Strawberries 50%CT

TotalZ = 742

TotalLOD = 595

LODRES = 0.006634

RDF #11

Field Trial Data

Grapefruit FT Data 

35%CT

TotalNZ = 14

TotalZ = 26

0.57

0.40

0.38

0.36

0.36

0.35

0.32

0.27

0.23

0.18

0.18

0.16

0.13

0.11

RDF #12

Field Trial Data

Caneberry FT Data 

100%CT

TotalNZ = 14

TotalZ = 0

7.1

6.1

5.5

4.7

4.1

3.3

2.3

1.9

1.8

1.8

1.7

1.4

1.2

1.0

RDF #13

Field Trial Data

Apricot (Peach FT Data) 

2.5%CT

TotalNZ = 20

TotalZ = 780

0.66

0.66

0.76

0.63

0.56

0.73

0.91

1.11

1.05

1.01

0.69

0.72

0.79

0.67

0.61

0.54

0.39

0.49

1.00

0.84

RDF #14

Field Trial Data

Cabbage FT Data 2.5%CT

TotalNZ = 12

TotalZ = 468

2.8

2.7

1.3

1.2

0.67

0.45

0.41

0.40

0.30

0.30

0.24

0.20

RDF #15

Field Trial Data

Papaya (Avocado FT 

Data) 100%CT

TotalNZ = 12

TotalZ = 0

0.58

0.52

0.51

0.45

0.42

0.42

0.40

0.38

0.32

0.31

0.20

0.14

RDF #16

PDP Data

Tangerines (Orange 

PDP Data) 15%CT

TotalZ = 1193

TotalLOD = 211

LODRES = 0.007051

RDF #17

PDP Data

Watermelon PDP Data 

2.5%CT

TotalZ = 362

TotalLOD = 9

LODRES = 0.0045

RDF #18

Field Trial Data

Olive FT Data 

100%CT

TotalNZ = 6

TotalZ = 0

3.7

3.4

2.3

2.1

2.0

1.8

RDF #19

Field Trial Data

Tomato FT Data 

10%CT

TotalNZ = 32

TotalZ = 288

0.16

0.18

0.10

0.09

0.07

0.05

0.08

0.08

0.21

0.29

0.23

0.06

0.20

0.03

0.24

0.18

0.22

0.32

0.29

0.30

0.46

0.64

0.04

0.06

0.10

0.12

0.18

0.20

0.07

0.08

0.15

0.21

1.3

0.61

0.42

0.41

0.41

0.33

0.32

0.29

0.28

0.27

0.26

0.26

0.24

0.21

0.21

0.19

0.18

0.18

0.17

0.17

0.16

0.14

0.14

0.14

0.13

0.13

0.13

0.13

0.12

0.12

0.12

0.098

0.097

0.096

0.094

0.092

0.088

0.086

0.084

0.082

0.081

0.075

0.075

0.074

0.071

0.070

0.065

0.063

0.061

0.060

0.055

0.054

0.054

0.053

0.044

0.043

0.042

0.040

0.038

0.036

0.032

0.032

0.032

0.03

0.028

0.028

0.028

0.026

0.024

0.023

0.022

0.02

0.016

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.014

0.014

0.011

0.011

0.01

0.01

1.7

1.2

1.1

0.76

0.73

0.73

0.61

0.57

0.47

0.37

0.37

0.35

0.34

0.34

0.31

0.27

0.23

0.22

0.22

0.21

0.20

0.20

0.20

0.18

0.17

0.17

0.16

0.16

0.15

0.15

0.14

0.14

0.14

0.11

0.11

0.10

0.092

0.091

0.090

0.089

0.083

0.074

0.072

0.062

0.062

0.061

0.056

0.053

0.044

0.042

0.042

0.040

0.039

0.036

0.036

0.032

0.030

0.028

0.021

0.020

0.015

0.015

0.015

0.015
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 23 of 24

RDF #20

Field Trial Data

Cucumber FT Data 

2.5%CT

TotalNZ = 20

TotalZ = 780

0.047

0.055

0.036

0.042

0.033

0.034

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.011

0.010

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.027

0.020

0.01

0.01

RDF #21

PDP Data

Squash PDP Data 

2.5%CT

TotalZ = 1264

TotalLOD = 32

LODRES = 0.01984

RDF #22

Field Trial Data

Chinese Napa Cabbage 

(Cabbage FT Data) 

100%CT

TotalNZ = 12

TotalZ = 0

2.8

2.7

1.3

1.2

0.67

0.45

0.41

0.40

0.30

0.30

0.24

0.20

RDF #23

PDP Data

Chinese Mustard Cabbage 

(Broccoli PDP) 100%CT

TotalZ = 0

TotalLOD = 32

LODRES = 0.0078

RDF #24

Field Trial Data

Brussels Sprouts 

(Cabbage FT Data) 

10%CT

TotalNZ = 12

TotalZ = 108

2.8

2.7

1.3

1.2

0.67

0.45

0.41

0.40

0.30

0.30

0.24

0.20

RDF #25

PDP Data

Apple Juice PDP Data 

15%CT

TotalZ = 629

TotalLOD = 111

LODRES = 0.01975

RDF #26

PDP Data

Grape Juice PDP Data 

10%CT

TotalZ = 670

TotalLOD = 75

LODRES = 0.009507

RDF #27

Field Trial Data

Guava FT Data 100%CT

TotalNZ = 6

TotalZ = 0

1.09

0.949

0.608

0.577

0.566

0.484
Fenpropathrin Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: D402246

Page 24 of 24

May 24, 2012

Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of Fenpropathrin (127901)

Sorted Alphabetically

(Reporting Timeframe: 2003-2010)

Percent Crop Treated

Crop Lbs. A.I. Average Maximum

1 Almonds 4,000 <2.5 <2.5

2 Apples 10,000 10 15

3 Apricots* <500 <1 <2.5

4 Avocados* <500 <1 <2.5

5 Blueberries <500 <2.5 <2.5

6 Broccoli* <500 <1 <2.5

7 Brussels Sprouts* <500 <5 10

8 Cabbage <500 <1 <2.5

9 Cantaloupes <500 <2.5 5

10 Cauliflower <500 <1 <2.5

11 Cherries 1,000 <2.5 5

12 Cotton 3,000 <1 <2.5

13 Cucumbers <500 <1 <2.5

14 Grapefruit 4,000 10 35

15 Grapes 10,000 5 10

16 Lemons <500 <1 <2.5

17 Nectarines* <500 <2.5 <2.5

18 Olives* <500 <1 <2.5

19 Oranges 40,000 15 35

20 Peaches <500 <1 <2.5

21 Peanuts 1,000 <1 <2.5

22 Pears 1,000 5 10

23 Peppers 2,000 5 10

24 Pistachios* <500 <1 <2.5

25 Plums/Prunes 1,000 <1 <2.5

26 Pumpkin <500 <1 <2.5

27 Squash <500 <1 <2.5

28 Strawberries 9,000 30 50

29 Tangelos <500 5 10

30 Tangerines 1,000 10 15

31 Tomatoes 4,000 5 10

32 Watermelon <500 <1 <2.5

All numbers rounded.

<500 Less than 500 pounds of active ingredient

<2.5 Less than 2.5 percent of crop treated

<1 Less than 1 percent of crop treated

* Based on CA DPR data only (valid because 80% or more of U.S. acres grown are in California)

SLUA data sources include: USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service) 

Private Pesticide Market Research, California DPR (Department of Pesticide Regulation)

These results reflect amalgamated data developed by the Agency and are releasable to the public.