alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1558

To provide for reimbursement of States, political subdivisions, and persons

that donated services, material, funds, or other things to allow the

continued operation, during a period of time when appropriations were

not available for the purpose, of all or any part of a public educational

or recreational facility, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 6, 1996

Mr. MCCAIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide for reimbursement of States, political subdivisions, and persons that donated services, material, funds,

or other things to allow the continued operation, during

a period of time when appropriations were not available

for the purpose, of all or any part of a public educational

or recreational facility, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1558 IS

1 SECTION 1. REIMBURSEMENT OF STATES, POLITICAL SUB2 DIVISIONS, AND PRIVATE PERSONS FOR DO3 NATIONS MADE TO ALLOW CONTINUED OP4 ERATION OF PUBLIC EDUCATIONAL AND

5 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES.

6 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘public

7 educational or recreational facility’’ means a unit of the

8 national park system or other Federal facility established

9 for the purpose of providing educational or recreational

10 opportunities to the general public, for the operation of

11 which funds were made available by H.R. 1977, 104th

12 Congress, 1st Session, as passed by the Senate and the

13 House of Representatives.

14 (b) REIMBURSEMENT.—Subject to the availability of

15 appropriations, the head of any department, agency, or

16 other entity to which a State, political subdivision, or per17 son donated services, material, funds, or any other thing

18 to allow the continued operation, during a period of time

19 when appropriations were not available for such purpose,

20 of all or any part of a public educational or recreational

21 facility, shall, at the request of the donor, reimburse the

22 donor for the expenses reasonably incurred by the donor

23 or the reasonable value of the thing donated, as deter24 mined by the head of the department, agency, or other

25 entity.
3

•S 1558 IS

1 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

2 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be

3 necessary to carry out this section.

Æ
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1631

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

EXTREME, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1631 ES

1 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

2 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

3 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

4 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

5 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of title 46,

6 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may

7 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en8 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

9 vessel EXTREME, United States official number

10 1022278.

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1631

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

other purposes.wise trade for the vessel EXTREME, and forpriate endorsement for employment in the coastissue a certificate of documentation with appro-
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Mark R. Goldston, Chairman, Chief Executive Officerand President of United Online, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(a)   theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information contained in such report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

Dated: November 9, 2005
| /s/ MARK R. GOLDSTON                              |     |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Mark R. Goldston                                  |     |
| *Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President* | * * |

 

----
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1826

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation and coastwise trade endorsement for the vessel COURIER SERVICE.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108

4 of title 46, United States Code, and section 27 of the Mer5 chant Marine Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), as applica6 ble on the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

7 of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation

8 with appropriate endorsement for employment in the

9 coastwise trade for the vessel COURIER SERVICE

10 (Vanuatu official number 688).

Passed the Senate July 29, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1826

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to

SERVICE.wise trade endorsement for the vessel COURIERissue a certificate of documentation and coast-
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. Victor LORIANO, a/k/a Liriano-Alvedo Jose Morgan; Tony Moreno; Manuel Soto; Shorty, Appellant.

No. 91-3217.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 13, 1993.

Before EDWARDS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

PER CURIAM.

It is Ordered, by the Court, on its own motion, that the order filed herein on July 13, 1993, be vacated. Upon consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing, the response thereto, the reply, and of the decision of the Supreme Court in *Sullivan v. Louisiana,*— U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2078, 124 L.Ed.2d 182 (1993), it is

Ordered, by the Court, that the petition is granted and the judgment of the court filed herein on February 12, 1993, 984 F.2d 1239 be, and the same hereby is, vacated insofar as it pertains to appellant in No. 91-3217.

The Clerk is directed to promptly issue the new judgment of the court. The Clerk is further directed to file this order *nunc pro tunc*July 13, 1993.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                  CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                          ----------------------------------------------------
                                            1997       1996       1995       1994       1993
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
                                                         (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before provision for income
  taxes................................   $297,499   $197,250   $215,872   $301,233   $260,697
  Distributions in excess of equity
     earnings of affiliates............     27,282      9,677         --         --         --
  Equity earnings (losses) in excess of
     distributions.....................         --         --     (4,490)    (3,930)    (3,808)
  Equity in losses of certain
     investees.........................      2,614      5,245      5,187         68        183
  Interest.............................    125,492    113,989    106,568     77,792     79,354
  Amortization of previously
     capitalized interest..............      4,115      3,600      3,440      3,039      2,833
  Portion of rent representative of
     interest factor...................     13,000     11,000     10,928     11,305     11,173
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
     Income as adjusted................   $470,002   $340,761   $337,505   $389,507   $350,432
                                          ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Fixed charges
  Interest expense.....................   $125,492   $113,989   $106,568   $ 77,792   $ 79,354
  Capitalized interest.................      7,000     12,000      5,000     12,000      4,000
  Portion of rent representative of
     interest factor...................     13,000     11,000     10,928     11,305     11,173
                                          --------   --------   --------   --------   --------
     Total fixed charges...............   $145,492   $136,989   $122,496   $101,097   $ 94,527
                                          ========   ========   ========   ========   ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.....       3.23x      2.49x      2.76x      3.85x      3.71x
</TABLE>
f10k2010a1ex10xvii_chinayida.htm



Exhibit 10.17




 


[English Summary]







Cooperative Agreement







Party A: Railway Media Center


Party B: Fuzhou Fuyu Advertisement Limited Company







Term:


Six years from March 1, 2009 to February 29, 2016.







Purpose:


Party A and Party B will be working together to create the TV series “Train Travel Across China” (the “Series”).







Responsibilities:


Party A will be responsible for the examination and broadcast of the Series, while Party B will be responsible for the creation and production.







Consulting fees:



	
(1)  

	
For the first three years of the Term, Party B shall pay to Party A consulting fees of 300,000 RMB per year;








	
(2)  

	
For the last three years of the Term, Party B shall pay to Party A consulting fees of 350,000 RMB per year;








	
(3)  

	
Such consulting fees shall be paid quarterly of even amount.












Cash Deposit:


Within seven days of the execution of this Agreement, Party B shall pay cash deposit of 100,000 RMB to Party A. If Party B is unable to fulfill its obligation, the Agreement will be void with no further effect and such cash deposit is non-refundable. If Party B can meet its obligation, then the cash deposit will be applied to the consulting fees of the first year.







Termination:


Except force majeure, either party cannot terminate the Agreement without consent of the other party, or such party shall be responsible for all the direct and indirect economic losses of the other party.







Dispute:


If there is any dispute between the parties, both parties shall resolve the dispute through compromise settlement. If the parties cannot reach the settlement, then either party can resolve the dispute by the courts.







Date of the Agreement:


February 13, 2009



 


 


1
##### 



Exhibit 3.4
 AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF
APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP INC.,
A DELAWARE CORPORATION
 (As Amended through February 19, 2008)
 ARTICLE I
OFFICES
 Registered Office
 Principal Office
 Other Offices
 ARTICLE II
MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS
 Time and Place of Meetings
 Annual Meetings of Stockholders
 Special Meetings




---



##### 



Stockholder Lists
 Notice of Meetings
 Quorum and Adjournment
 Voting ,




---



##### 



Proxies
 Inspectors of Election
 ARTICLE III
DIRECTORS
 Powers
 Number, Election and Tenure
 Nominations for Election as Director




---



##### 



Meetings
 Annual Meeting
 Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Quorum
 Fees and Compensation
 Meetings by Telephonic Communication
 Committees
 Action Without Meetings




---



##### 



Filling of Vacancies
 ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS
 Appointment and Salaries
 Removal and Resignation
 Chairman of the Board
 Chief Executive Officer
 President
 Chief Operating Officer
 Vice President




---



##### 



Secretary and Assistant Secretary
 Chief Financial Officer
 Treasurer
 Bonds
 Assistant Officers
 ARTICLE V
SEAL
  ARTICLE VI
FORM OF STOCK CERTIFICATE




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
REPRESENTATION OF SHARES OF OTHER CORPORATIONS
  ARTICLE VIII
TRANSFERS OF STOCK
  ARTICLE IX
LOST, STOLEN OR DESTROYED CERTIFICATES
  ARTICLE X
RECORD DATE




---



##### 



ARTICLE XI
REGISTERED STOCKHOLDERS
  ARTICLE XII
FISCAL YEAR
  ARTICLE XIII
AMENDMENTS
  ARTICLE XIV
DIVIDENDS
 Declaration
 Set Aside Funds
 ARTICLE XV
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE
 Right to Indemnification




---



##### 



Right of Claimant to Bring Suit
 Non-Exclusivity of Rights
 Insurance
 Expenses as a Witness
 Indemnity Agreements
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2
                                                                    ------------

                                 Certification

   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of Nexstar Finance,
L.L.C. and Nexstar Finance, Inc. (together, the "Company"), hereby certifies
that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March
31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

<TABLE>
<S>                                                   <C>
Dated: May 20, 2003                                   /s/  G. Robert Thompson
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      G. Robert Thompson
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
</TABLE>

   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
----

            COMMISSION DECISION         

of 22 December 2006         

approving monitoring plans for the detection of residues or substances in live animals and animal products pursuant to Council Directive 96/23/EC as submitted by Bulgaria and Romania

(notified under document number C(2006) 6815)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/15/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 96/23/EC of 29 April 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing Directives 85/358/EEC and 86/469/EEC and Decisions 89/187/EEC and 91/664/EEC (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of Article 8(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The monitoring plan for the detection of residues or substances, as provided for in Article 5(1) of Directive 96/23/EC, submitted by Bulgaria to the Commission on 25 April 2006 is approved.

Article 2

The monitoring plan for the detection of residues or substances, as provided for in Article 5(1) of Directive 96/23/EC, submitted by Romania to the Commission on 20 March 2006 is approved.

Article 3

The Decision shall apply subject to and as from the date of entry into force of the Treaty of Accession of Bulgaria and Romania.

Article 4

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 2006.

For the Commission

Markos KYPRIANOU            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 125, 23.5.1996, p. 10. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 191, 28.5.2004, p. 1).

----
EXHIBIT 13.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: June 22, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Xu XiaomingXu XiaomingChairman of the Board of Directors




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: June 22, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Shen YiShen YiGeneral Manager




---



##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  June 22, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Tang XiangdongTang XiangdongChief Accountant
Incorporation by Reference 

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0028 

February 6, 2012 

The contents of the following docket are hereby incorporated by reference into and are 

considered to be included in, contained in and to have been placed in Docket EPA-HQ-OAR2011-0028 (Proposed Confidentiality Determinations for Data Elements Under the Mandatory 

Reporting of Greenhouse Gases Rule): 

1) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0927 (Additional Sources of Fluorinated Gases) 

2) EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0923 (Petroleum and Natural Gas System; Final Rule) 

3) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0512 (Technical Revisions to the Petroleum and Natural Gas 

Systems Category of the Greenhouse gas Reporting Rule) 

4) EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0417 (Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Revision to Best 

Available Monitoring Method Provisions) 

Accessing dockets: 

Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West 

Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004. This Docket 

Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. 

The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone 

number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
EXHIBIT 99.2


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Harry Chauhan, President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Wine
Agencies Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 18, 2004


/s/ Harry Chauhan
-----------------
Harry Chauhan
President and Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

September 2, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20179

Summary Calendar

JAMES D ROBISON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HOUSTON HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(H-02-CV-1950)

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Robison appeals dismissal of his medical malpractice and

false imprisonment claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

We affirm.

The district court did not err in finding that it lacked

subject matter jurisdiction over Robison’s claims. Federal courts1 See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.

, 511 U.S. 375,

377 (1994).

2 See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332.

3 S ee Ramming v. United States , 281 F.3d 158, 161 (5th Cir. 2001).

2 are courts of limited jurisdiction and, absent ju risdiction

conferred by statute or the Constitution, lack the power to

adjudicate claims. 1 Federal courts have subject matter

jurisdiction only where a question of federal law is involved or

where there is diversity of citizenship between the parties and the

amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. 2 The burden of establishing

federal jurisdi c tion rests on Robison. 3 Robison’s complaint

asserts several causes of action, none of which rest on questions

of federal law. Likewise, there is no diversity of citizenship.

Therefore, because neither a federal question or diversity of

citizenship exists, the district court lacked subject matter

jurisdi ction over this cause of action and it was properly

dismissed.
----

Information concerning the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Community and New Zealand on certain aspects of air services

The Agreement between the European Community and New Zealand on certain aspects of air services, signed in Brussels on 21 June 2006, entered into force on 25 October 2007, in accordance with Article 8(1) of the Agreement, as the last notification was deposited on 25 October 2007.

----
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Patrick L.
Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Patrick L. AlexanderPatrick
      L. AlexanderChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      14, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 25 1 A 1 7

Filed 2 March 2018

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. OMAR JALAM COOK

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 802 S.E.2d 575 (201 7 ), finding no error after
appeal from judgment s entered on 9 February 201 6 by Judge Hugh B. Lewis in
Superior Court, Mecklenburg County

. Heard in the Supreme Court on 8 January

2018

.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Joseph L. Hyde , Assistant Attorney General, for the State

. Ann B. Petersen for defendant

- appell ant

.

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED.