Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 55767 

Actions Compliance Procedures 

(2) If cracking or excessive elongation of the rear seat bolt 

hole is found during any inspection required in paragraph 

(e)(1) of this AD, replace the seat frame with a factory remanufactured seat frame, a new part number (P/N) 7– 

1500 (standard) seat frame, or a new P/N 7–1501 (wide) 

seat frame. Replacement of the seat frame terminates the 

repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.

Before further flight after the inspection 

where cracking or excessive elongation of the rear seat bolt hole is 

found.

Follow American Champion Aircraft 

Corp. Service Letter No. 431, dated 

July 20, 2009. 

(3) You may at any time replace the rear seat frame with a 

factory remanufactured seat frame, a new part number (P/ 

N) 7–1500 (standard) seat frame, or a new P/N 7–1501 

(wide) seat frame to terminate the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD.

Not applicable ....................................... Follow American Champion Aircraft 

Corp. Service Letter No. 431, dated 

July 20, 2009. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(f) The Manager, Chicago Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

Send information to ATTN: Wess Rouse, 

Aerospace Engineer, 2300 East Devon 

Avenue, Room 107, Des Plaines, Illinois 

60018; telephone: (847) 294–8113; fax: (847) 

294–7834. Before using any approved AMOC 

on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector 

(PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District 

Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local 

FSDO. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(g) You must use American Champion 

Aircraft Corp. Service Letter No. 431, dated 

July 20, 2009, to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact American Champion 

Aircraft Corporation, P.O Box 37, 32032 

Washington Ave., Rochester, Wisconsin 

53167; telephone: (262) 534–6315; fax: (262) 

534–2395; Internet: http:// 

www.amerchampionaircraft.com/Technical/ 

Technical.html. 

(3) You may review copies of the service 

information incorporated by reference for 

this AD at the FAA, Central Region, Office of 

the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas 

City, Missouri 64106. For information on the 

availability of this material at the Central 

Region, call (816) 329–3768. 

(4) You may also review copies of the 

service information incorporated by reference 

for this AD at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call (202) 741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on 

October 13, 2009. 

Kim Smith, 

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–25258 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–0998; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–198–AD; Amendment 

39–16065; AD 2009–22–12] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier 

Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet 

Series 700, 701 & 702) Airplanes, 

Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet 

Series 705) Airplanes, and Model CL– 

600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) 

Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for the 

products listed above. This AD results 

from mandatory continuing 

airworthiness information (MCAI) 

originated by an aviation authority of 

another country to identify and correct 

an unsafe condition on an aviation 

product. The MCAI describes the unsafe 

condition as: 

The heating capability of several [angle of 

attack] AOA transducer heating elements 

removed from in-service aircraft has been 

found to be below the minimum requirement. 

Also, it was discovered that a large number 

of AOA transducers repaired in an approved 

maintenance facility were not calibrated 

accurately. 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducer and/or degraded AOA transducer 

heating elements can result in early or late 

activation of the stall warning, stick shaker 

and stick pusher by the Stall Protection 

Computer (SPC). 

* * * * * 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducers and/or degraded AOA 

transducer heating elements could 

result in ineffective response to 

aerodynamic stall and reduced 

controllability of the airplane. This AD 

requires actions that are intended to 

address the unsafe condition described 

in the MCAI. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

November 13, 2009. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in the AD 

as of November 13, 2009. 

We must receive comments on this 

AD by December 14, 2009. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–40, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The street address for 

the Docket Operations office (telephone 

(800) 647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES

section. Comments will be available in 

the AD docket shortly after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Wing Chan, Aerospace Engineer, 

Avionics and Flight Test Branch, ANE– 

172, FAA, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office, 1600 Stewart 

Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York 

11590; telephone (516) 228–7311; fax 

(516) 794–5531. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
55768 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation 

(TCCA), which is the aviation authority 

for Canada, has issued Canadian 

Airworthiness Directive CF–2009–35, 

dated August 31, 2009 (referred to after 

this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe 

condition for the specified products. 

The MCAI states: 

The heating capability of several [angle of 

attack] AOA transducer heating elements 

removed from in-service aircraft has been 

found to be below the minimum requirement. 

Also, it was discovered that a large number 

of AOA transducers repaired in an approved 

maintenance facility were not calibrated 

accurately. 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducer and/or degraded AOA transducer 

heating elements can result in early or late 

activation of the stall warning, stick shaker 

and stick pusher by the Stall Protection 

Computer (SPC). 

This [Canadian] directive mandates a 

periodic inspection of the inrush current to 

verify the AOA heating capability and 

replacement of the inaccurately calibrated 

AOA transducers. 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducers and/or degraded AOA 

transducer heating elements could 

result in ineffective response to 

aerodynamic stall and reduced 

controllability of the airplane. You may 

obtain further information by examining 

the MCAI in the AD docket. 

Relevant Service Information 

Bombardier has issued Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–051, dated May 14, 

2009. The actions described in this 

service information are intended to 

correct the unsafe condition identified 

in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are issuing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined the unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

Differences Between the AD and the 

MCAI or Service Information 

We have reviewed the MCAI and 

related service information and, in 

general, agree with their substance. But 

we might have found it necessary to use 

different words from those in the MCAI 

to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. 

operators and is enforceable. In making 

these changes, we do not intend to differ 

substantively from the information 

provided in the MCAI and related 

service information. 

We might also have required different 

actions in this AD from those in the 

MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. 

Any such differences are highlighted in 

a Note within the AD. 

FAA’s Determination of the Effective 

Date 

An unsafe condition exists that 

requires the immediate adoption of this 

AD. The FAA has found that the risk to 

the flying public justifies waiving notice 

and comment prior to adoption of this 

rule because the risk of having a 

degraded transducer is higher with units 

that have more than 7,500 total flight 

hours accumulated. Degraded AOA 

transducers can result in inaccurate 

activation of the stall warning, stick 

shaker, or stick pusher, which could 

result in ineffective response to 

aerodynamic stall and reduced 

controllability of the airplane. 

Therefore, we determined that notice 

and opportunity for public comment 

before issuing this AD are impracticable 

and that good cause exists for making 

this amendment effective in fewer than 

30 days. 

Comments Invited 

This AD is a final rule that involves 

requirements affecting flight safety, and 

we did not precede it by notice and 

opportunity for public comment. We 

invite you to send any written relevant 

data, views, or arguments about this AD. 

Send your comments to an address 

listed under the ADDRESSES section. 

Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2009–0998; 

Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–198– 

AD’’ at the beginning of your comments. 

We specifically invite comments on the 

overall regulatory, economic, 

environmental, and energy aspects of 

this AD. We will consider all comments 

received by the closing date and may 

amend this AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this AD. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this AD will not 

have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

2009–22–12 Bombardier, Inc. (Formerly 

Canadair): Amendment 39–16065. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 55769 

Docket No. FAA–2009–0998; Directorate 

Identifier 2009–NM–198–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This airworthiness directive (AD) 

becomes effective November 13, 2009. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model 

CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 

702) airplanes, Model CL–600–2D15 

(Regional Jet Series 705) airplanes, and 

Model CL–600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 

900) airplanes; certificated in any category, 

that are equipped with Thales angle of attack 

(AOA) transducers having part number 

C16258AA. 

Subject 

(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 27: Flight Controls. 

Reason 

(e) The mandatory continued airworthiness 

information (MCAI) states: 

The heating capability of several [angle of 

attack] AOA transducer heating elements 

removed from in-service aircraft has been 

found to be below the minimum requirement. 

Also, it was discovered that a large number 

of AOA transducers repaired in an approved 

maintenance facility were not calibrated 

accurately. 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducer and/or degraded AOA transducer 

heating elements can result in early or late 

activation of the stall warning, stick shaker 

and stick pusher by the Stall Protection 

Computer (SPC). 

This [Canadian] directive mandates a 

periodic inspection of the inrush current to 

verify the AOA heating capability and 

replacement of the inaccurately calibrated 

AOA transducers. 

Inaccurate calibration of the AOA 

transducers and/or degraded AOA transducer 

heating elements could result in ineffective 

response to aerodynamic stall and reduced 

controllability of the airplane. 

Actions and Compliance 

(f) Unless already done, do the following 

actions. 

(1) Within the applicable compliance times 

specified in Table 1 of this AD: Measure the 

inrush current of both AOA transducers, in 

accordance with Part A of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 670BA–27–051, dated May 

14, 2009. 

TABLE 1—INITIAL MEASUREMENT

For any AOA transducer that, as of the effective date of this AD, has 

accumulated— Do the initial inrush current measurement— 

Less than 6,500 total flight hours ............................................................. Before the AOA transducer has accumulated 7,500 total flight hours. 

More than or equal to 6,500 total flight hours but less than 7,500 total 

flight hours.

Within 500 flight hours after the effective date of this AD but before the 

AOA transducer has accumulated 8,000 total flight hours. 

More than or equal to 7,500 total flight hours .......................................... Within 250 flight hours after the effective date of this AD. 

(2) If, during any measurement required by 

paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, an AOA 

transducer is found to have an inrush current 

less than 1.60 amps (‘‘degraded’’ transducer), 

before further flight replace the transducer 

with a new or serviceable transducer, in 

accordance with Part C of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier 

Service Bulletin 670BA–27–051, dated May 

14, 2009. Do the measurement specified in 

paragraph (f)(1) of this AD for that 

replacement transducer at the times specified 

in (f)(2)(i) or (f)(2)(ii) of this AD. 

(i) At the applicable time specified in Table 

2 of this AD if the degraded transducer was 

replaced with a serviceable transducer that is 

not new; or 

(ii) Within 2,000 flight hours after 

replacement if the degraded transducer was 

replaced with a new one. 

(3) If, during any measurement required by 

paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, an AOA 

transducer is found to have an inrush current 

more than or equal to 1.60 amps, repeat the 

measurement specified in paragraph (f)(1) of 

this AD thereafter at intervals not to exceed 

the applicable interval specified in Table 2 of 

this AD. 

TABLE 2—REPETITIVE MEASUREMENT INTERVALS

If the last inrush current measurement of the serviceable AOA transducer is— Then repeat the measurement— 

More than or equal to 1.90 amps ............................................................. Within 2,000 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.80 amps but less than 1.90 amps .................... Within 1,500 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.70 amps but less than 1.80 amps .................... Within 1,000 flight hours after the last measurement. 

More than or equal to 1.60 amps but less than 1.70 amps .................... Within 500 flight hours after the last measurement. 

FAA AD Differences 

Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ 

or service information as follows: This AD 

does not require the one-time inspection for 

serial numbers and on-condition replacement 

in Paragraph 1. of the MCAI. The planned 

compliance times for this action would allow 

enough time to provide notice and 

opportunity for prior public comment on the 

merits of those actions. Therefore, we are 

considering further rulemaking to address 

this issue. 

Other FAA AD Provisions 

(g) The following provisions also apply to 

this AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, New York Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. Send information to Attn: Wing 

Chan, Aerospace Engineer, Avionics and 

Flight Test Branch, ANE–172, FAA, New 

York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, 

Westbury, New York 11590; telephone (516) 

228–7311; fax (516) 794–5531. Before using 

any approved AMOC on any airplane to 

which the AMOC applies, notify your 

principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or 

principal avionics inspector (PAI), as 

appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, 

your local Flight Standards District Office. 

The AMOC approval letter must specifically 

reference this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any 

reporting requirement in this AD, under the 

provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act 

(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) has 

approved the information collection 

requirements and has assigned OMB Control 

Number 2120–0056. 

Related Information 

(h) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness 

Directive CF–2009–35, dated August 31, 

2009; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 

670BA–27–051, dated May 14, 2009; for 

related information. 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
55770 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 208 / Thursday, October 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(i) You must use Bombardier Service 

Bulletin 670BA–27–051, dated May 14, 2009, 

to do the actions required by this AD, unless 

the AD specifies otherwise. 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference of 

this service information under 5 U.S.C. 

552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Coˆte 

Vertu Road West, Dorval, Que ́bec H4S 1Y9, 

Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514– 

855–7401; e-mail 

thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet http:// 

www.bombardier.com. 

(3) You may review copies of the service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221 or 425–227–1152. 

(4) You may also review copies of the 

service information that is incorporated by 

reference at the National Archives and 

Records Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, or go 

to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 

16, 2009. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E9–25917 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

18 CFR Part 35 

[Docket No. RM01–5–000; Order No. 714] 

Electronic Tariff Filings; Correction 

October 23, 2009. 

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, DOE. 

ACTION: Correcting amendments. 

SUMMARY: This document contains 

corrections to the final regulations, 

which were published in the Federal 

Register of Wednesday, October 3, 2008 

(73 FR 57515). The regulations relate to 

the obligation to file rate schedules, 

tariffs and certain service agreements 

and to the withdrawals and 

amendments of rate schedules, and tariff 

or service agreement filings. 

DATES: Effective on October 29, 2009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andre Goodson, 888 First St., NE., 

Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–8560, 

Andre.Goodson@ferc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The final regulations that are the 

subject of these corrections concern the 

filing of rate schedules, tariffs, and 

service agreements under the Federal 

Power Act. 

Need for Correction 

In Order No. 714, the instructions for 

the amendatory language contained 

errors that resulted in the publication of 

incorrect language in the Federal 

Register for sections 35.1 and 35.17. In 

particular, the published regulations do 

not reflect that they are applicable to 

rate schedules, tariffs, and service 

agreements. 

List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 35 

Electric power rates, Electric utilities, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Electricity, Incorporation 

by reference. 

■ Accordingly, 18 CFR part 35 is 

corrected by making the following 

correcting amendments: 

PART 35—FILING OF RATE 

SCHEDULES AND TARIFFS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 35 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 791A–825R, 2601– 

2645; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 42 U.S.C. 7101–7352. 

■ 2. In § 35.1, paragraphs (b) and (c) are 

revised to read as follows: 

§ 35.1 Application; obligation to file rate 

schedules, tariffs and certain service 

agreements. 

* * * * * 

(b) A rate schedule, tariff, or service 

agreement applicable to a transmission 

or sale of electric energy, other than that 

which proposes to supersede, cancel or 

otherwise change the provisions of a 

rate schedule, tariff, or service 

agreement required to be on file with 

this Commission, shall be filed as an 

initial rate in accordance with § 35.12. 

(c) A rate schedule, tariff, or service 

agreement applicable to a transmission 

or sale of electric energy which 

proposes to supersede, cancel or 

otherwise change any of the provisions 

of a rate schedule, tariff, or service 

agreement required to be on file with 

this Commission (such as providing for 

other or additional rates, charges, 

classifications or services, or rules, 

regulations, practices or contracts for a 

particular customer or customers) shall 

be filed as a change in rate in 

accordance with § 35.13, except 

cancellation or termination which shall 

be filed as a change in accordance with 

§ 35.15. 

* * * * * 

■ 3. In § 35.17, the heading and 

paragraphs (c) and (d) are revised to 

read as follows: 

§ 35.17 Withdrawals and amendments of 

rate schedule, tariff or service agreement 

filings. 

* * * * * 

(c) Withdrawal of suspended rate 

schedules, tariffs, or service agreements, 

or parts thereof. Where a rate schedule, 

tariff, or service agreement, or part 

thereof has been suspended by the 

Commission, it may be withdrawn 

during the period of suspension only by 

special permission of the Commission 

granted upon application therefor and 

for good cause shown. If permitted to be 

withdrawn, any such rate schedule, 

tariff, or service agreement may be 

refiled with the Commission within a 

one-year period thereafter only with 

special permission of the Commission 

for good cause shown. 

(d) Changes in suspended rate 

schedules, tariffs, or service agreements, 

or parts thereof. A public utility may 

not, within the period of suspension, 

file any change in a rate schedule, tariff, 

or service agreement, or part thereof, 

which has been suspended by order of 

the Commission except by special 

permission of the Commission granted 

upon application therefor and for good 

cause shown. 

* * * * * 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E9–25972 Filed 10–28–09; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 312 

[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0464] 

Investigational New Drug Applications; 

Technical Amendment 

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final rule; technical 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug 

Administration (FDA) is amending its 

investigational new drug application 

(IND) regulations to add an address for 

applicants to submit INDs for in vivo 

bioavailability and bioequivalence 

studies in humans. INDs for these 

studies that are intended to support 

abbreviated new drug applications 

(ANDAs) should be sent directly to the 


dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES