alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, DC 20460

Section 4 Submission

This is an original submission:

✔

This is an amendment:

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that (1) all information entered on this form is

complete and accurate; and (2) any confidentiality claims are true and correct as to that information

for which they have been asserted. Any knowing and willful misinterpretation is subject to criminal

penalty pursuant to 18 USC 1001.

Signature: Official Title:

Director Environmental, Health and Safety

Contact Person:

Shawn P. Wiram

Email Address:

swiram@brenntag.com

Date Signed:

08/11/2014

PART 1 Contact Information

Submission

Information

Submission Type:

TestRules

Form Alias:

TestRules-20140811-10:43:46 EDT

Federal Register Notice:

76 FR 1067

Date Submitted:

08/11/2014

Submitter

Information

Company Name:

Brenntag North America, Inc.

Address:

5083 Pottsville Pike

Reading, PA, 19605

United States

Contact Person:

Shawn P. Wiram

Phone Number:

3174547226

Email Address:

swiram@brenntag.com

Technical Contact

Information

CBI

Yes: 	No: 

✔

Company Name:

Brenntag North America, Inc.

Address:

3111 North Post Road

Indianapolis, IN, 46226

United States

Contact Person:

Mr Shawn P. Wiram

Phone Number:

3174547226

Email Address:

swiram@brenntag.com

PART 2 Letter Of Intent

Not for Submission
SEC4 Submission Page 2

Chemical

Identification

CASRN:

110-44-1

CBI

Yes: 	No: 

✔

Chemical Name:

2,4-Hexadienoic Acid, (2E, 4E)-

Chemical Test Name:

C6

Sponsoring Firms CBI

Yes: 	No: 

✔

Company Name:

Brenntag North America, Inc.

Address:

5083 Pottsville Pike

Reading, PA, 19605

United States

Phone Number:

3174547226

Additional

Information

Document Type:

Amendment to the Study Plan

File Name:

Brenntag- Intent to Test Letter &

Study Plan {06.25.14}.pdf

Attachment Date:

08/11/2014

Chemicals

Paperwork Reduction Act: The Government Paperwork Elimination Act (GPEA) (44 U.S.C. 3501) provides that, when practicable, Federal organizations use electronic forms, electronic filings, and

electronic signatures to conduct official business with the public. EPA's Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Regulation (CROMERR) (40 CFR part 3), published in the Federal Register on October 13,

2005 (70 FR 59848) (FRL-7977-1)(Ref. 2), provides that any requirement in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to submit a report directly to EPA can be satisfied with an electronic

submission that meets certain conditions once the Agency published a notice in the Federal Register announcing that EPA is prepared to receive certain documents in electronic form. For more

information about CROMERR, go to http://www.epa.gov/cromerr/.

Not for Submission
./ 2015-136 

TO: 

ATTN: 

Rulemaking Cover Sheet 

Secretary of State 

Administrative Procedure Officer, 

101 SHS, Augusta ME 04333 

1. Agency: Department of Environmental Protection 

2. Agency umbrella and unit number: 06-096 

3. Title of rule: Conformity of General Federal Actions 

4. Chapter number assigned to the rule: 141 

ACCEPTED FOR 

FILING 

JUL 2 2 2015 

SECRETARY OF STATE 

5. Dates/methods of notice: May 20, 2015 in the Kennebec Journal, Portland Press Herald, Bangor 

Daily News, Lewiston Sun Journal and Waterville Morning Sentinel. 

6. Date/place of bearing: None, 30-day comment with opportunity for hearing if requested. 

7. Type: 0 new rule 0 partial amendment(s) of existing rule 

suspension of existing rule X repeal of rule emergency rule 

[1 repeal and replace (complete replacement of existing chapter, with former version 

simultaneously repealed) 

8. Name and phone of agency contact person: 

Tom Graham 

207-287-7598 

9. If a major substantive rule under Title 5, c. 375, sub-CII-A, check one of the following 

0 provisional adoption (prior to Legislative review) D final adoption 

D emergency adoption of major substantive rule 

10. Certification Statement: I, Patricia W. Aho, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of the 

rule described above and lawfully adopted by the Department of Environmental Protection on July 

13, 2015. I further ce · that all portions of this rule are adopted in compliance with the 

requirements e M · e Administrat · e Pro ed e Act. 

Printed name & title: Patricia W. Aho, Commissioner 

11. ~(~dIS' 

0 

w 

> 

~ 

m 

Approved as to form and legality by the Attorney General on 

Signature > 

~G-£ Ol!E~IEO\l~~ (original signature, personally signed by an Assistant Attorney General) 

~LJ \), ~l'J. lR I JUL 2 2 ; 15 .. Printed Name: l Af\G- r 

OFFICE OF THE SECRET*_Y OF STATE 

1\UuU;> 11\, IV!f\I''IE
#### Darryl DAVIS, Appellant, v. Kevin ROSS, Iowa City Police Officer; Officer Heick; Appellees, Unknown/Unnamed Defendants, Sued as Iowa City, IA Chief of Police; Defendants, Tony Nobile, Appellee.

No. 92-3326.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 3, 1993.

Decided June 10, 1993.

*138Darryl Davis, pro se.

Anne G. Burnside, Iowa City, IA, for ap-pellees.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Davis, an Iowa inmate, appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action as time-barred. We affirm.

In a complaint received by the court on January 27, 1992, Davis alleged that on August 11, 1989, defendant Iowa police officers assaulted him during his arrest.. Davis alleged that, while he was at Mercy Hospital in Iowa City, the officers informed him that he fit the description of an assailant; when he sought additional information, they became aggressive, put a choke hold on him, and handcuffed him. Davis alleged the officers subsequently injured his wrists, kicked him, and choked him. Davis alleged that he told the officers at the time he was placed in the squad car that he was going to bring legal action against them for their assaultive behavior. In resistance to defendants’ motion to dismiss his action as time-barred, Davis argued that he was not aware he had a section 1983 claim until April 11, 1990, when the state dismissed the criminal charges brought against him in connection with his arrest. The district court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss. .

The district court correctly determined that Davis’s action was barred by Iowa’s two-year statute of limitations. *See Wycoff v. Menke,*773 F.2d 983, 984 (8th Cir.1985), *cert. denied,*475 U.S. 1028, 106 S.Ct. 1230, 89 L.Ed.2d 339 (1986) (personal injury statute of limitations applies to section 1983 action). Davis’s allegation in his complaint that he told the officers he would bring legal action against them for assaulting him belies his contention that he was unaware he had a cause of action until April 1990. In any event, his cause of action arose when defendants arrested him on August 11, 1989. *Cf. Kaster v. Iowa,*975 F.2d 1381, 1382 (8th Cir.1992) (per curiam) (cause of action arose when state officials searched and seized plaintiffs property, not when his state court action concluded). Davis’s argument that hospitals are covered by a different statute of limitations is meritless.

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable R.E. Longstaff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
#### In the Matter of John Jay STOKES, Jr., Debtor. Anthony P. FERRIS, Trustee, Appellee, v. John Jay STOKES, Jr., Appellant.

No. 92-8710

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 14, 1993.

William C. Davidson, Jr., Minter, Joseph & Thornhill, P.C., Austin, TX, for appellant.

Robert R. Bradshaw, Babb & Bradshaw, Austin, TX, for appellee.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this bankruptcy case involving the dis-chargeability of a claim pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523, the primary question is whether a finding of actual fraud and of the applicabili*77ty of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) necessarily precludes a finding that the same conduct also amounts to “willful and malicious conduct” under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). In a comprehensive opinion, *Stokes v. Ferris,*150 B.R. 388 (W.D.Tex.1992), the district court, in an appeal from the bankruptcy court, answered the question in the affirmative, holding that the same conduct can give rise to a cause of action under both section 523(a)(2)(A) and section 523(a)(6). *See id.*at 392.

We affirm, essentially for the reasons stated, and the analysis made, by the district court. This holding is consistent with existing caselaw for, while we are aware of no case that holds that conduct under one of the provisions cannot also constitute conduct under the other, a number of courts have suggested that the same conduct can violate both provisions. *See, e.g., Britton v. Price (In re Britton),*950 F.2d 602, 603-05 (9th Cir.1991); *Rubin v. West (In re Rubin),*875 F.2d 755, 758 n. 1 (9th Cir.1989); *Giangrasso v. Butler (In re Giangrasso),*145 B.R. 319, 321-24 (Bankr.9th Cir.1992); *Seay v. Greene (In re Greene),*150 B.R. 282, 285-87 (Bankr. S.D.Fla.1993); *Goins v. Day (In re Day),*137 B.R. 335, 341-42 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.1992).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone CapitalCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2009 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrentlyherewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: May 5, 2009

 

 
| /s/  Gresford Gray       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Gresford  Gray           |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

1

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cal-Bay International, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and  result of operations of the
Company.




                              /s/Robert  Thompson
                              -------------------------
                              Robert  Thompson
                              Chief  Executive  Officer
                              May  12,  2003
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 OF
THE 1934 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
             /s/ Michael R. RodriguezMichael R. RodriguezSenior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2061
TOMAS CABRERA, Petitioner, versus PETER D. KEISLER, Acting Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A90-682-311) Submitted: July 20, 2007 Decided: October 4, 2007 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aroon Roy Padharia, LAW OFFICE OF AROON R. PADHARIA, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Jonathan Robbins, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tomas Cabrera, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the decision of the immigration judge denying a motion to reconsider a final order of removal. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the Board’s affirmance of the immigration judge’s order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2) (2007); Jean v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 475, 481, 482-83 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Cabrera , No. A90-682-311 (B.I.A. Sept. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION

FOR REINSTATEMENT OF BRIAN

JEFFREY ROSENBERG TO THE

BAR OF MARYLAND *

*

*

*

*

* IN THE

SUPREME COURT

OF MARYLAND

AG No. 50

September Term, 202 3

ORDER

Upon consideration of attorney Brian Jeffrey Rosenberg’s p etition for r einstatement

to the Bar of Maryland and Bar Counsel ’s consent to that relief

, it is this 22nd day of April

2024

, by the Supreme Court of Maryland

,

ORDERED that the p etition is granted ; and it is further

ORDERED that Brian Jeffrey Rosenberg is reinstated as a member of the Bar of

Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name Brian Jeffrey

Rosenberg upon the register of attorneys entitl ed to practice law in this State and certify

that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the c lerks of all judicial tribunals

in this State.

/s/ Matthew J. Fader

Chief Justice
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR SIP REVISION 

IMPERIAL COUNTY 2009 1997 &HOUR OZONE MODIFIED 

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 

Planning Area: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District 

Title 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix V - 

2.1 (e) Evidence of Compliance with State's 

Procedural Requirements blication" and ARB 

2.1 (f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with 

40 CFR part 51.102 

2.2(b) Identification of Attainment Areaistatus See 2009 Ozone Plan 

2.2(c) Estimate of Plan's Impact on Emissions See 2009 Ozone Plan 

2.2(d) Demonstration that Plan 

See 2009 Ozone Plan 

2.2(e) Modeling Support
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.35

          Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the
         Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.

September 12, 2002

Ed Thompson
President, PMRS, Inc.
423 Sargon Way
Horsham, PA 19044

Dear Mr. Thompson:

In response to your letter dated August 23rd, 2002 and as a result of our recent
conversation, we would like to propose the following:

o     2.2(a) Orders shall be a minimum of [**] Kgs Bulk Product.

o     2.3(b) CollaGenex agrees to pay PMRS a [**]% down payment at the placement
      of the order. CollaGenex shall provide an annual Letter of Credit for the
      annual manufacturing volume.

o     4.1 term extended from 16 Sep 2003 to 30 Mar 2007, or until a generic
      doxycycline 20 mg tablet is available on the market, whichever comes
      first.

o     4.4 CollaGenex may not terminate the contract to change manufacturing
      sites except as specified in section 2.2(d) or in the event that
      CollaGenex is acquired either substantially or in entirety.

o     EXHIBIT D: CollaGenex commits to yearly volumes of at least [**] tablets
      with the first manufacturing year to begin in March, 2003.

            o     Next campaign to fulfill the outstanding Letter of Credit will
                  remain at $ [**]/tablet.
            o     Beginning September 15, 2003 (the end of the current
                  contract), campaigns will be $ [**]/tablet.
            o     Any campaigns between March 2003 and September 2003
                  (CollaGenex commits to at least [**] tablets) will be at
                  $[**]/tablet.

o     EXHIBIT D: If, at Collagenex's cost and responsibility, the content
      uniformity specification for the first set of in-process blend samples
      (MFC 29608 Step B.11) is removed, the price for [**] tablets per year will
      be reduced by $ [**]/tablet.




<PAGE>

For CollaGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

/s/John McPartland
--------------------------------
Mr. John McPartland
Director of Manufacturing

If you agree to these terms please sign below:

For PMRS:

/s/Edwin Thompson
--------------------------------
Mr. Edwin Thompson
President
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.M

                             AMENDMENT NUMBER SIX
                                    TO THE
                          BW/IP INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                               RETIREMENT PLAN
               (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 1993)

        The BW/IP International, Inc. Retirement Plan, as amended and restated
as of January 1, 1993 (the "Plan"), is hereby further amended as follows:

1.  Determination of Small Benefit
    ------------------------------

        Section 6.12 of the Plan is amended by deleting the second sentence
thereof any by inserting the following in lieu thereof:

        "The Actuarial Value of the lump sum payment shall be determined using
        an interest rate equal to the interest rate on 30-year Treasury
        securities as specified by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue under 
        Code Section 417(e) for the month of November of the year preceding the
        year in which the date of distribution shall occur and using the
        prevailing mortality table of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue used
        to determine reserves for group annuity contracts under Code Section
        807(d)(5) as required under Code Section 417(e)."

2.  Ratification and Reaffirmation
    ------------------------------

        Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.

3.  Effective Date
    --------------

        This Amendment Number Six to the Plan as restated shall be effective as
of November 1, 1995; provided, however, that such amendment shall not be
effective for any Participant in the Plan whose date of distribution is prior
to January 1, 1996 if the effect of such Amendment would be to reduce the
present value of




                                      1




<PAGE>   2
the Participant's benefit from that which it would have been had such Amendment
not been adopted.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company maintaining the Plan has caused this
Amendment Number Six to be executed as of the 19th day of October 1995.


                                                   BW/IP International, Inc.


                                                   By /s/  D.G. Taylor
                                                     --------------------------













                                      2
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

"'- :·_: .' I ,-- . . • . ~~.I \_ .. 

From: Michael Reeve, Reeve Air Alaska <mreeve@reevecorp.com>~~:·;-_-J;.:::·-! 

Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 4:20 PM • ,· _: ~~~.: ~;~_:\·:':i=•i ·. 3 

To: Faulk, Scott (OST) 

Subject: Fwd: services to Tatitlek 

-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:services to Tatitlek 

Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 18:45:13 +0000 (UTC) 

From:Roselene Vlasoff <rvlasoff@vahoo.com> 

Reply-To:Roselene Vlasoff <rvlasoff@vahoo.com> 

To: mreeve@reevecorp.com <mreeve@reevecorp.com> 

To whom it may concern, 

· -, r: ·. ~~ i '"' ':~. ; • . 'a cJ,J . _-,; ! I_; r. ;I· _) ; 

I would like to see Reeve's Air to continue to fly to Tatitlek to Anchorage 

Anchorage to Tatitlek 

He is kind, helpful to the people, is helpful in town when we need to drop 

off boxes, 

Thank you 

Rosaline Vlasoff · 

Tatitlek, Alaska 

No virus found in this message. 

Checked by A VG - www.avg.com 

Version: 2015.0.5751 I Virus Database: 4315/9395 -Release Date: 03/27115 

Internal Virus Database is out of date. 

1
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY

LINDA S. ADAMS

SECRETARY FOR

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

1001 I STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 • P.O. Box 2815, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95812-2815

(916) 323-2514· (916) 324.{)908 FAX • WWW.CALEPA.CA.GOy

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER

GOVERNOR

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld

Regional Administrator

United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, California 94105-3901

Thank you for your letter of October 19, 2010 to Governor Schwarzenegger seeking the

. position of the State of California (State) on the proposed listing of the New Idria Mercury

Mine on the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL). The State of California agrees that

the environmental threats identified in your letter must be addressed; however we are

concerned with the long-term funding obligations that typically fall to the State at sites like

the New Idria Mercury Mine.

Accordingly, concurrence with this listing or with any future Record of Decision and

subsequent agreement to State Superfund Contracts must be based in part on selection

of optimal remedial actions that limit or eliminate long-term operation and maintenance

(O&M) costs. Where appropriate, the State will be looking to the United States EPA for

substantial application of removal action funding and support for identification and

selection of protective remedies which will reduce State cost share requirements. The

State will also be seeking a cooperative partnership with U.S. EPA to aggressively pursue

cost recovery against viable responsible parties and to creatively identify alternative

funding sources.

Finally, the State will be looking to the U.S. EPA to help develop long-term sustainability

and optimization of funding sources for cleanup of both NPL fund lead and State sites.

Meeting this objective will require close coor9ination with U.S. EPA in developing funding

strategies for existing fund lead sites, as weH as consideration of potential long-term

burden on the State in selection of future NPL sites. Long-term O&M at fund lead sites

may require management in a fashion that optimizes utilization of available funding which

could include reduction or elimination of certain O&M activities based on established

budget priorities.

AIR RESOURCES BOARD· DEPARTMENT OF PESTICIDE REGULATION· DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARD AsSESSMENT

STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD • REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARDS
Mr~ Jared Blumenfeld

Page 2

To the extent that the above conditions are acceptable to U.S. EPA, the State supports

the listing of New Idria Mercury Mine on the NPL.

inda S. Adams

Secretary for Environmental Protection

cc: Mr. Thomas Howard

Executive Director

State Water Resources Control Board

Post Office Box 100

Sacramento, California 95812-0100

Ms. Pamela Creedon

Executive Officer

Regional Water Quality Control Board

Central Valley Region

11020 Sun Center Drive, Suite 200

Rancho Cordova, California 95670

Mr. Maziar Movassaghi

Acting Director

Department of Toxic Substances Control·

Post Office Box 806

Sacramento, California 95812-0806