alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice; update webinar registration links.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission on Civil Rights published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of Thursday, December 7, 2023, concerning various meetings of the New Mexico Advisory Committee. The document contained outdated registrations links. These are the updated webinar registration links as follows:                    

February 6

*https://www.zoomgov.com/​webinar/​register/​WN_​DTG2mXQ_​QWmzrsKFznMWlw*

March 5

*https://www.zoomgov.com/​webinar/​register/​WN_​zL_​DChg8TrKVMakhraA9pA*

March 28

*https://www.zoomgov.com/​webinar/​register/​WN_​sN2fpf9PTM2osHMy2cITXg*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Brooke Peery, (202) 701-1376,                         *bpeery@usccr.gov.*

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of Friday, December 7, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-28559, on page 89363, third column and page 89364, first and second columns, all times remain the same 12:00 p.m.-1:30 p.m. Mountain Time.                    

Dated: January 22, 2024.

David Mussatt,

Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.

[FR Doc. 2024-01489 Filed 1-24-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
```

[Congressional Record Volume 158, Number 129 (Friday, September 21, 2012)]
[Extensions of Remarks]
[Page E1583]
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]

             HONORING THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF ROHNERT PARK

                                 ______
                                 

                          HON. LYNN C. WOOLSEY

                             of california

                    in the house of representatives

                      Thursday, September 20, 2012

  Ms. WOOLSEY. Mr, Speaker, I rise today to honor a city in my District 
on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of its establishment. 
Incorporated in 1962, Rohnert Park has become an integral part of 
Sonoma County's historical and cultural heritage.
  The land that would become Rohnert Park was known as Rancho Cotate 
when it was granted by General Mariano Vallejo to one of his soldiers 
in 1844. During the next century, the land would change ownership many 
times and experience much development.
  After World War II, when Sonoma County experienced a surge in growth, 
the City of Rohnert Park was conceived and developed by two Sonoma 
County lawyers, Paul Golis and Maurice Fredericks, who had a vision of 
a vibrant planned community in the heart of the valley. Their concept 
stressed the importance of ``neighborhood units'', groups of houses 
centered around schools and parks, in order to provide ample recreation 
to city-dwellers.
  Through collaboration and hard work, Rohnert Park was established in 
1962. Today it is proud to serve its residents with many recreational 
amenities and attractions. Rohnert Park is home to two municipal 
swimming pools, an 18-hole golf course, and bike, hiking, and 
equestrian trails. The city also contains Sonoma State University and 
the Green Music Center.
  Mr. Speaker, Rohnert Park is an important city in the heart of Sonoma 
County. Please join me in honoring Rohnert Park on the occasion of its 
50th anniversary.

                          ____________________
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-50472 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RENE GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-94-CV-8825

- - - - - - - - - - September 3, 1996 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rene Garza (#568511) moves for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (IFP), arguing that the district court improperly denied his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence. Garza has identified no error in the denial. See United States v. Garza , SA-994-CV-8825 (W.D. Tex. May 31, 1995). His appeal fails to present a nonfrivolous issue; the motion for IFP is DENIED. Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir.No. 95-50472 - 2 - 1986). The appeal is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT  32
                           CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


Pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  the
undersigned  officer  of  the  registrant  certifies,  to  the  best  of  his
knowledge,  that  the  registrant's  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB  for
the  period  ended  September  30,  2004  (the  "Form  10-QSB")  fully  complies
with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities
Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  that  the  information  contained  in  the  Form
10-QSB,  fairly  presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  registrant.

Date: November 15, 2004


Amanasu  Environment  Corporation


/s/ Atsushi Maki
________________________
Atsushi  Maki
CEO,  CFO,  CAO
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. of Section 1350, as Created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     By:
    /s/ MARK W. DURANDMark W. DurandSenior Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-50355

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL HERNANDEZ-CASTORENA, ALSO KNOWN AS

ANGEL ACEVEDO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. EP-00-CR-2089-ALL-DB

--------------------

December 11, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Manuel Hernandez-Castorena (Hernandez) argues that he is

entitled to be resentenced because the district court failed to

verify that counsel had read and discussed his presentence report

(PSR) with him prior to sentencing as required by FED. R. CRIM. P.

32(c)(3)(A). 

We agree that the district court failed to comply with Rule

32(c)(3)(A). However, because Hernandez did not raise the issue

of noncompliance in the district court, we will correct the error

only if it was plain and affected Hernandez’s substantial rights. 
No. 01-50355

-2-

See United States v. Esparza-Gonzalez, 268 F.3d 272, 273-74 (5th

Cir. 2001); see also United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732-34

(1993). 

Hernandez failed to object to the Rule 32(c)(3)(A) violation

in the district court. He does not argue that he did not review

or discuss his PSR with his attorney; instead, he relies on the

absence of any record evidence to indicate that he reviewed and

discussed the PSR with counsel. Thus, Hernandez has not

demonstrated that he was prejudiced by the court’s failure to

comply with Rule 32(c)(3)(A). Because Hernandez has failed to

carry his burden of demonstrating prejudice, he has not

established plain error. See United States v. Vasquez, 216 F.3d

at 456, 459 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 972 (2000). 

The district court’s failure to advise Hernandez that he had

the right to be assisted by counsel if he elected to proceed to a

jury trial was harmless. 

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40305 Summary Calendar

EDWARD ALLEN MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:91-CV-138

- - - - - - - - - - October 23, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Edward Allen Moore, #305768, filed a civil rights action under 42 USC § 1983 relating to criminal charges that had been lodged against him by officials in St. Louis, Missouri pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). Moore asserts that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint under Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994). It is plain thatNo. 96-40305 - 2 - Moore's claims are claims for unlawful actions that could render any conviction in Missouri invalid. Contrary to Moore’s reasoning, Heck applies to his claims and they are not yet ripe. The district court did not err in its dismissal of this complaint.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2011 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: January 31, 2012



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David Watson       
|David Watson           
|Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                              BAYCORP HOLDINGS, LTD

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of BayCorp Holdings, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Frank W. Getman Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of BayCorp Holdings, Ltd. as of December 31, 2002.


Date: June 9, 2003                        /s/ Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Frank W. Getman Jr.
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (chief executive officer and
                                          chief financial officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         January 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on January 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 43 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-168, CP2024-174.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-00947 Filed 1-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 17 (Thursday, January 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 4932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-01444]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[Docket No.: ED-2023-SCC-0192]


Department of Education Information Collection Activities; 
Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and 
Approval; Comment Request; Entry Evidence and Evaluation & Exit 
Evidence Forms; Correction

AGENCY: Office for Finance and Operations (OFO), Department of 
Education (ED).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 22, 2024, the U.S. Department of Education published a 
30-day comment period notice in the Federal Register with FR Doc. 2024-
01107 (89 FR 3916, column 1, column 2) seeking public comment for an 
information collection entitled, ``Entry Evidence and Evaluation and 
Exit Evidence Forms''. The Department will revise related information 
collection forms. A new 30-day public comment notice will be published.
    The PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and Clearance, Office of 
the Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy 
Development, hereby issues a correction notice as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

    Dated: January 22, 2024.
Stephanie Valentine,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and Clearance, Office of the 
Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2024-01444 Filed 1-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1







               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





The Board of Directors
Hallmark Capital Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the subject registration statement
(No. 33-80-700) on Form S-8 of Hallmark Capital Corp. of our report dated
August 1, 1997, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition
of Hallmark Capital Corp. and subsidiary as of June 30, 1997 and 1996, and the
related consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1997, which
report appears in the June 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Hallmark
Capital Corp.


                                                          KPMG Peat Marwick, LLP




Milwaukee, Wisconsin
September 16, 1997










                                    -100-
Unassociated Document


 



Exhibit 10.8










10 August 2007


 


Empire Resources Inc


One Parker Plaza


Fort Lee


NJ07024


 



	
Dear Nathan







 


LETTER OF CONFIRMATION OF TRADING RELATIONSHIP


 


This letter outlines the mutual agreement between Empire Resources Incorporated (Empire) and Hulamin Rolled Products (Hulamin) as at 10 August 2007. This agreement remains valid until 9 August 2008 and replaces the agreement as captured in the letter dated 6th September 2000, and signed by Empire Resources Incorporated and Hulett Aluminium Rolled Products (Pty) Ltd.


 


Hulamin confirms that Empire is the exclusive distributor of Hulamin’s products in the United States of America and Canada. As is currently the case, Empire may order from and be invoiced by Hulamin. Each transaction between Empire and Hulamin will be negotiated on a transaction by transaction basis. Empire will continue to provide support to service the customers in the above mentioned territory as if they are customers of Hulamin.


 


Empire shall not incur any liability on behalf of Hulamin or in any way pledge or purport to pledge Hulamin’s credit, or accept any order or make any contract binding upon Hulamin without the prior consent of Hulamin.


 


Empire warrants that upon expiry of the agreement that it will have no claim for compensation of any type against Hulamin.


 


This agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South Africa.


 


Neither party has made any representation to the other or given any warranty or commitment to extend the agreement. At the same time this agreement can be amended or extended by mutual agreement subject to any such amendment or extension being recorded in writing and signed by the authorized representatives of Empire and Hulamin.


 


Kind regards


 


 



	
/s/ Frank Bradford

	 	
/s/ Nathan Kahn, August 13, 2007

	 
	
Frank Bradford.

	 	
Nathan Kahn

	 
	
For Hulamin Rolled Products

	 	
For Empire Resources Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 25, 1999 AND FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 25, 1999
CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 25, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000910721
<NAME> J. JILL GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                            5948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,705
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,952
<PP&E>                                          55,744
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,399
<BONDS>                                         19,098
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,359
<SALES>                                        250,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               250,281
<CGS>                                          171,545
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                78,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,084)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (684)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00479-CR

BRIAN SPILLER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 87th District Court

Freestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 03-181-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Brian Spiller filed a post-conviction “motion for discovery” in the trial 

court to obtain materials to assist him in pursuing post-conviction relief. The motion 

requested the trial court to order the release of “Incident Report, Witness Statements, 

Victims Statements and any Affidavits.” In response, the district clerk’s office provided 

Spiller with a copy of the indictment and judgment of conviction and explained that it 

did not possess the requested documents.
Spiller v. State Page 2

Spiller has filed a “motion to appeal decision not to release discovery.” He 

complains of the trial court’s refusal to rule on his motion and requests us to order the 

trial court to produce the requested documents.

We do not have jurisdiction of an appeal pertaining to a post-conviction motion 

for discovery of evidence. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2008) (standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law, 

but whether appeal is authorized by law); Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. 

App.—Waco 2002, no pet.) (stating that court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals 

only when expressly granted by law). No law authorizes such an appeal. Cf. Clegg v. 

State, 214 S.W.3d 671, 671 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, no pet.) (“No statute vests this court 

with jurisdiction over an appeal from an order denying a request for a free copy of the 

trial record when such a request is not presented in conjunction with a timely filed 

direct appeal.”). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 17, 2013

Do not publish

[CR25]