alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1825 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1825

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel HALCYON.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 3, 1996

   Mr. Lott introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
                coastwise trade for the vessel HALCYON.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That notwithstanding sections 12106, 12107, and 12108 of title 46, 
United States Code, and section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
U.S.C. App., 883), as applicable on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Transportation may issue a certificate of 
documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
coastwise trade for the vessel HALCYON (United States official number 
690219).
                                 <all>
```
mascot_ex101.htm


Exhibit 10.1







Mascot Ventures Inc.


1802 North Carson Street, Suite 108


Carson City, Nevada 89701


 


 


November 19, 2011







Wendy Wildmen


President


Mascot Ventures Inc.


1802 North Carson Street, Suite 108


Carson City, Nevada 89701







This letter agreement, dated November 19, 2011, memorializes the terms and conditions of an agreement of compensation by and between Wendy Wildmen (“Wildmen”) and Mascot Ventures Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”).







1.  Compensation.  The Company agrees to pay Wildmen, for a term of two (2) years, $1,000 per month, on the last day of each month, as consideration for Wildmen serving and performing his duties as a non-employee President of the Company.  Wildmen shall have such executive responsibilities and duties as are assigned by the Board of Directors of the Company and are consistent with the position of President.  Wildmen shall assign her right to such compensation of $1,000 per month to the Company, until such time as the Company closes on an equity or debt financing of not less than $100,000.


 


2.   Assignment.  This letter agreement may not be assigned unless the Company and Wildmen consent in writing to such assignment.


 


Very truly yours,


 




	 	
MASCOT VENTURES, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Clive Hope	 
	 	 	Name:  Clive Hope	 
	 	 	Title:    Secretary	 







 


Agreed and Accepted this 19th day of November, 2011:


 




	

By: 



	/s/ Wendy Wildmen	 	 
	 	Name:  Wendy Wildmen (individually)
# Dziennik Urzędowy L 30/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0766 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | L 30 |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Legislacja | Rocznik 633 lutego 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0766

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

L 30

Wydanie polskie

Legislacja

Rocznik 633 lutego 2020

---

| Spis treści | | Sprostowania | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Sprostowanie do decyzji Rady (UE) 2019/1815 z dnia 24 października 2019 r. w sprawie mianowania dwóch członków i trzech zastępców członków Komitetu Regionów zaproponowanych przez Republikę Słowenii ( Dz.U. L 278 z 30.10.2019 ) | 1 |

Spis treści

Sprostowania

Strona

*

Sprostowanie do decyzji Rady (UE) 2019/1815 z dnia 24 października 2019 r. w sprawie mianowania dwóch członków i trzech zastępców członków Komitetu Regionów zaproponowanych przez Republikę Słowenii ( Dz.U. L 278 z 30.10.2019 )

( Dz.U. L 278 z 30.10.2019 )

1

| PL | Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas.
  Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną. |
| --- | --- |

PL

Akty, których tytuły wydrukowano zwykłą czcionką, odnoszą się do bieżącego zarządzania sprawami rolnictwa i generalnie zachowują ważność przez określony czas.

Tytuły wszystkich innych aktów poprzedza gwiazdka, a drukuje się je czcionką pogrubioną.

---

Sprostowania

| 3.2.2020 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | L 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

L 30/1

---

Sprostowanie do decyzji Rady (UE) 2019/1815 z dnia 24 października 2019 r. w sprawie mianowania dwóch członków i trzech zastępców członków Komitetu Regionów zaproponowanych przez Republikę Słowenii

(
  Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej L 278 z dnia 30 października 2019 r.
  )

Strona 12, art. 1 lit. b) tiret pierwsze:

jest:

| „— | Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”, |
| --- | --- |

„—

Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”,

župan Mestne občine Maribor

powinno być:

| „— | Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”. |
| --- | --- |

„—

Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,”.

župan Mestne občine Maribor

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 15

- 3134

_____________________________
P ATRICK S COTT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James O. Shelfer , Judge

. December 14, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. In this direct appeal, we affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences for sexual battery and possession of cocaine. We write only to address Appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in scoring his prior Georgia burglary conviction as burglary of an

oc cupied structure.
Below and on appeal, the parties disagree whether the underlying facts establish that the store in Georgia was occupied when Appellant burglarized it. However, “neither the trial court nor this court is permitted to consider underlying facts in determining the existence of an analogous Florida offense.” Snipes v. State , 793 So. 2d 1107, 1108 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Instead, only the elements of the out

- of

- state crime should be considered in2 determining whether a conviction is analogous to a Florida crime. Dautel v. State , 658 So. 2d 88, 91 (Fla. 1995); Bracey v. State , 109 So. 3d 311, 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013); Michaud v. State , 2 So. 3d 375, 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Montoure v. State , 880 So. 2d 793, 794 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Knarich v. State , 866 So. 2d 165, 168 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Snipes , 793 So. 2d at 1108 ; Holybrice v. State , 753 So. 2d 621, 623 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Lee v. State , 675 So. 2d 682, 683 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)

. Appellant has not a rgued below or on appeal that the trial court erred in relying on underlying facts to score the Georgia burglary conviction or that the elements of the out

- of

- state crime were not analogous to the Florida offense of bu rglary of an occupied structure. Here, the court will not reverse the trial court’s ruling on grounds neither r aised nor argued by the parties . Acco rdingly, we affirm

.
A FFIRMED

.
B ILBREY , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Boardof Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the datehereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (“Form 10-Q”), filedconcurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: May 5, 2009

 

 
| /s/  David Gladstone     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David  Gladstone         |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

1

----
## 2004 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 4-20-2004 

# U SA v . W i g gins P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 03-3527

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2004 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . 

## Re c omme nde d C it at ion " U SA v . W i gg in s " (2004). 2004 D e cisio n s . P ape r 800. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004/800
#### Terrence McCRADY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The TOWN OF WARDENSVILLE; Hardy County; William D. Moomau; Donald Rotruck; David Warren, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-2421.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 6, 2003.

Decided Feb. 12, 2003.

Terrence McCrady, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Douglas Lorensen, Bowles, Rice, McDavid, Graff & Love, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Terrence McCrady appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. *See McCrady v. Town of Wardensville,*No. CA-02-23-3 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We deny McCrady’s motion for oral argument and his motion to strike Appellees’ informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dante W. HARVEY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-4773.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 8, 2003.

Decided Feb. 7, 2003.

Brent A. Jackson, Hill, Tucker, Marsh & Jackson, P.L.L.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Stephen W. Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Dante W. Harvey pled guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (2000) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (2000), and one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000), reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from his person at the *663time of his arrest. Harvey contends the arresting officers violated his Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The factual findings underlying a motion to suppress are reviewed for clear error, while the legal determinations are reviewed de novo. *Ornelas v. United States,*517 U.S. 690, 699, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996); *United States v. Rusher,*966 F.2d 868, 873 (4th Cir.1992). When a suppression motion has been denied, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government. *United States v. Seidman,*156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th Cir.1998).

Police officers “may elevate a police-citizen encounter into an investigatory detention only if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity may be afoot, even if the officer lacks probable cause. Reasonable suspicion is something more than an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch.” *United States v. Burton,*228 F.3d 524, 527-28 (4th Cir.2000) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). The police officer does not have to rule out the possibility that the target of his investigation was engaged in innocent conduct. *United States v. Arvizu,*534 U.S. 266, 277, 122 S.Ct. 744, 151 L.Ed.2d 740 (2002). We find the police officers had reasonable suspicion to approach the apartment building with their weapons drawn and to detain Harvey outside the apartment budding’s hallway. We further find no Fourth Amendment violation as a result of the seizure of the handgun.

Harvey’s detention escalated to an arrest after the seizure of the handgun and the revelation that there was an outstanding warrant for his arrest. We find the subsequent search of his person to be appropriate. *Chimel v. California,*395 U.S. 752, 762-63, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969).

Accordingly, we affirm the convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Adam Mauerberger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Atlantic Wine
Agencies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report
         is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
         this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
         evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
         controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
         identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
         internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal controls; and

<PAGE>

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Adam Mauerberger
------------------------------
Name: Adam Mauerberger
Title: President
#### Phil W. COCHREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John BARNES, V.P. Gen. Mgr.; and Pepsi Americas, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 02-3325.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Jan. 24, 2003.

Phil W. Cochren, Overland Park, KS, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Katherine A. Hansen, Spencer, Fane, Britt *&*Browne, Kansas City, MO, Jeannie M. DeVeney, Spencer, Fane, Britt & Browne, Overland Park, KS, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before KELLY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff, proceeding *pro se,*filed an action against his former employer and a vice-president of the company alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 *et seq.,*and Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e *et*
      *506
      *seq.*Defendants filed a motion to dismiss alleging that Plaintiff had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. The district court granted Defendants’ motion finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.

Our review of the record and the briefs reveals that Plaintiff has not exhausted his administrative remedies. Plaintiff has failed to present any evidence that he complained to the EEOC regarding his termination or any other acts of retaliation that form the basis for this lawsuit as required by 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(l). Therefore, after a thorough review of the briefs and the record, we affirm for substantially the same reasons set forth in the district court’s well-reasoned July 22, 2002, Order.

AFFIRMED.

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.
EXHIBIT NO. 23.1










INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statements Nos.
33-3-3040, 333-67581, 333-67581-01,  333-67581-02, 333-67581-03 and 333-67581-04
on Form S-3 and Registration Statements Nos. 33-3-3042, 33-3-3044, 333-27987 and
333-95497 on Form S-8 of UnionBanCal Corporation of our report dated January 22,
2001,  appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of  UnionBanCal  Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 2000.





San Francisco, California
March 20, 2001
Exhibit 4.6
  WARRANT
to purchase
7,846,852
Shares of Common Stock
 of Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
  Definitions
 Affiliate
 Appraisal Procedure
 Board of Directors




---



##### 



Business Combination
 business day
 CapGen Investor Letter
 Capital Stock
 Charter
 Common Stock
 Common Stock Issuance
 Company Schedule A
 convertible securities
 Exchange Act
 Exercise Price Schedule A
 Expiration Time
 Fair Market Value
 Initial Number
 -2-




---



##### 



Investment Agreements
 Issue Date Schedule A
 Market Price
 Ordinary Cash Dividends provided Schedule A
 Permitted Transactions
 Person
 Per Share Fair Market Value
 Pro Rata Repurchases
 -3-




---



##### 



Effective Date
 Regulatory Approvals
 SEC
 Securities Act
 Shares
 trading day
 U.S. GAAP
 VWAP
 Warrant
 Warrantholder
 -4-




---



##### 



Written Agreement
 Number of Shares; Exercise Price Warrantholder Schedule A Shares
 Exercise of Warrant; Term
 Expiration Time Schedule A
     -5-




---



##### 



Issuance of Shares; Authorization; Listing
 No Fractional Shares or Scrip
 No Rights as Stockholders; Transfer Books
 Charges, Taxes and Expenses
 -6-




---



##### 



Transfer/Assignment
    Exchange and Registry of Warrant
 Loss, Theft, Destruction or Mutilation of Warrant
 Saturdays, Sundays, Holidays, etc.
 Rule 144 Information
 -7-




---



##### 



Adjustments and Other Rights provided
 Stock Splits, Subdivisions, Reclassifications or Combinations
 Certain Issuances of Common Shares or Convertible Securities convertible
securities Common Stock Issuance
 -8-




---



##### 



Initial Number
 Permitted Transactions
 Other Distributions Per Share Fair Market Value
 -9-




---



##### 



Certain Repurchases of Common Stock
 Business Combinations
 -10-




---



##### 



Rounding of Calculations; Minimum Adjustments
 Timing of Issuance of Additional Common Stock upon Certain Adjustments provided however
 Other Events
 Statement Regarding Adjustments
 -11-




---



##### 



Notice of Adjustment Event
 Proceedings Prior to Any Action Requiring Adjustment
 Adjustment Rules
 Other Transactions
 Exchange
  -12-




---



##### 



No Impairment
 Governing Law, etc.
 Binding Effect
 Amendments
 Prohibited Actions
 Notices Schedule A
 Entire Agreement Schedule A
 -13-




---



##### 



[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
 -14-




---



##### 



COMPANY:Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.By:Name:Title:Attest:By:Name:Title: [Signature Page to Warrant]




---



##### 



ANNEX A
  
 TO:
    
    Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.
 RE:
    
    Election to Purchase Common Stock
   
 
 Holder:By:Name:Title:




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A
 Item 1
 
 Item 2
  Item 3
  Item 4
  Item 5
 provided, however
 Item 6
 Companys address:
    
    Hampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.999 Waterside Dr., Suite 200Norfolk, VA 23510
 Item 7
 Notice information:
    
    Douglas J. GlennEVP and General CounselHampton Roads Bankshares, Inc.999 Waterside Drive, Suite 200Norfolk, Virginia 23510Phone: (757) 217-1000Fax: (757) 217-3656