alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Charles A. Prebay, the Chief Financial Officer of Cal Bay International, Inc. (the Company), certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6. The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: November 10, 2004

/s/ Charles A. Prebay

Charles A. Prebay

Chief Financial Officer
#### Kenneth WAYNE, in his contracted capacity as Power of Attorney in Fact, Plaintiff—Appellant, and, Consular & Diplomatic Transport Services, Plaintiff, v. Gerry L. ALEXANDER; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 02-35709.

D.C. No. CV-01-05565-JKS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 10, 2003.*

Decided Feb. 13, 2003.

Before LEAVY, FERNANDEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Kenneth Wayne1 appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing without prejudice his action alleging various constitutional violations arising from one or more traffic stops and Wayne’s subsequent criminal conviction for driving an unlicensed vehicle. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, *Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.,*143 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir.1998), we affirm.

The district court properly concluded that Wayne lacked third-party standing to assert CDTS’s alleged constitutional claims. *See Voigt v. Saveli,*70 F.3d 1552, 1564 (9th Cir.1995).

The district court also properly dismissed Wayne’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim challenging the validity of his criminal conviction because Wayne may not bring such an action unless and until his conviction is reversed through a direct appeal or writ of habeas corpus. *See Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 486-87, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994).

Appellant’s remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Consular & Diplomatic Transport Services (''CDTS”) is not a proper party to this appeal. *See Licht v. Am. W. Airlines (In re Am. W. Airlines),*40 F.3d 1058, 1059 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam).
EXHIBIT 32
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 Certification of Periodic Financial Report
    Dated: August 14, 2008
    /s/ Daniel D. LeonardDaniel D. LeonardPresident & Chief Executive OfficerDated: August 14, 2008
    /s/ Mike L. WilhelmsMike L. WilhelmsSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
RE: NELCO Products

Rick Lee 

t

o

:

Shaheerah Kelly 02/16/2010 11:18 AM

History: This message has been forwarded.

Hi Kelly,

Here, it is the permit (see attached).  The evaluation was attached in an earlier email.

Please let me know if you need anything else.

Rick Lee

Air Quality Engineer

South Coast AQMD

Team B

909-396-2629

909-396-3350 (fax)

rlee@aqmd.gov 

From: Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 9:52 AM

To: Rick Lee

Subject: NELCO Products

Hi, Rick.

As I mentioned to you one the phone this morning, I am seeking information about the NOx BACT 

determination for the forced circulation heater at NELCO products. Below is the BACT determination that 

was in the CARB and SCAQMD databases. It would be helpful if you could provide me with the current 

permit (ATC or PTO) and engineering evaluation or similar document that describes the operation of the 

forced circulation heater. Please let me know.

NELCO Products 

Unit = Forced circulation heater, Natural gas fuel, Ultra LNB for NOx, 19 mmbtu/hr 

NOx = 12 ppmvd at 3% O2

CO = 50 ppmvd at 3% O2

Thank you!

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

Air Division (AIR-3)

U S EPA Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street
San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
efc12-75_ex102.htm



Exhibit 10.2


 


 


 


January 24, 2012







Andrew M. Senchak


KBW, Inc.


787 7th Avenue


New York, NY 10019







Re: Notice of Non-Extension of Employment Agreement (“Notice”)







Dear Mr. Senchak:







Reference is made to the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), entered into by and between you and KBW, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), dated as of February 1, 2010. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the definitions used in the Agreement.







Under Section 1 of the Agreement, on each anniversary of the date of the Agreement (each such anniversary, the “Renewal Date”), the term of the Agreement automatically extends to terminate on the third anniversary of such Renewal Date unless, at least thirty (30) days prior to the Renewal Date, the Company or you delivers notice to the other party stating that it desires or you desire (as the case may be) not to extend the Employment Period. Under the Agreement, the next Renewal Date will be February 1, 2012.







This letter constitutes Notice to you from the Company, delivered in accordance with Section 1 and Section 12(b) of the Agreement, that the Employment Period shall not be extended and, accordingly, the term of the Agreement will expire on February 1, 2014, subject to earlier termination in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.







Please execute this letter to acknowledge your receipt of this Notice and return one such executed original copy to the Company.







 






	 	 	Sincerely,	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	KBW, Inc.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Mitchell B. Kleinman	 
	 	 	Name:	Mitchell B. Kleinman	 
	 	 	Title:	General Counsel	 
	 	 	 	 







 


 


I hereby acknowledge receipt of this Notice, properly delivered to me.



 



	 	 	/s/ Andrew M. Senchak	 
	 	 	 	
  Andrew M. Senchak

	 
	 	 	 	 





 




 


 




	 	 	 	 






	cc:	Stephen W. Skonieczny, Esq.	 	 
	 	Dechert LLP	 	 
	 	1095 Avenue of the Americas	 	 
	 	New York, NY 10036-6797
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Gladstone Capital Corporation (the Company), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2013 (Form 10-Q), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 3, 2014



| |  |                        
| |  | -----------------------
| |  | /s/ Melissa Morrison   
| |  | Melissa Morrison       
| |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
      32


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
      the
      registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form
      10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
      10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the registrant.





Date:
                May 22, 2006Amanasu
                Environment Corporation/s/
                Atsushi MakiAtsushi
                MakiCEO,
                CFO, CAO
<PAGE>   1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                 Current Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 25, 1996

                         STARTRONIX INTERNATIONAL INC.
                (Name of registrant as specified in its charter)


         Delaware                       1-9190                    912263272
(State or other jurisdiction of    Commission file            (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)         number                Identification No.)


2402 Michelsen Drive, Suite 160
Irvine, California                                                        92715
(Address of principal executive offices)                              (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (714) 474-1700

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



<PAGE>   2
Item 5. Other Events.

        The Company previously completed a Regulation S private placement of
its Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to a group of investors through a
placement agent. The Company has determined to suspend conversion of the Series
C Convertible Preferred Stock issued in such Regulation S private placement as
a result of concerted market irregularities in the trading of the Company's
outstanding common stock which management believes is related to the conversion
terms of such Regulation S private placement.

<PAGE>   3
                                   SIGNATURE

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, hereunto duly authorized, on November 6, 1996.

                                        StarTronix International Inc.


                                        By:    /s/ James Valle
                                              ----------------------------
                                        Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                              ----------------------------
Exhibit 99.01-CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
              OFFICER

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
               TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I

I hereby certify that the Quarterly Report of New England Acquisitions, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition of New England Acquisitions,
Inc. as of December 31, 2002.

Date: August 13, 2003

 /s/ Gary Cella
 -------------------------
     Gary Cella
     Principal Executive Officer and
     Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         We have issued our reports  dated  January 19, 2001,  accompanying  the
consolidated  financial  statements  included in the 2000  Annual  Report of SVB
Financial Services, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000. We
hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  of  said  reports  in the
Registration  Statement of SVB Financial  Services,  Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-66131, effective October 26, 1998, File No. 333-66165, effective October 27,
1998,  File No.  333-40778,  effective  July 3,  2000  and  File No.  333-40754,
effective July 3, 2000).




Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 26, 2001
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40027 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
FREDI ARMANDO MENDOZA

- CORTES, also known as Fredy Armando Mendoza

- Cortez, also known as Bernardo Hernandez , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:13

- CR

- 1245

- 1

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Fredi Armando Mendoza

Cortes raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez

- Escareno , 700 F.3d 751, 753

- 54 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied , 133 S. Ct. 2044 (2013), which held that the sentence enhancement provided for in U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) applies to a conviction for the federal crime of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 2 9 , 2014

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40027 Document: 00512751147 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2014No. 14

- 40027
conspiracy to commit a fe deral drug traffic king offense. The unopposed motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 14-40027 Document: 00512751147 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/29/2014
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.6

                         SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

                               1994 DIRECTORS PLAN

                    NOTICE OF GRANT OF AUTOMATIC STOCK OPTION


                  Notice is hereby given of the following stock option (the
"Option") to purchase shares of the common stock of Sunstone Hotel Investors,
Inc. (the "Corporation") which has been granted pursuant to the Corporation's
1994 Directors Plan (the "Plan"):

                  OPTIONEE:         FIELD (1)

                  GRANT DATE:       FIELD (2)

                  TYPE OF OPTION:   Non-Statutory Stock Option

                  EXERCISE PRICE:   $FIELD (3) per share

                  NUMBER OF OPTION SHARES:     1,500 shares

                  EXPIRATION DATE:  FIELD (4)

                  EXERCISE SCHEDULE:           The Option is immediately 
                                               exercisable for
                                               all the Option Shares.

                  VESTING SCHEDULE:            The Option Shares are fully 
                                               vested.

                  Optionee understands and agrees that the Option is granted
subject to and in accordance with the express terms and conditions of the Plan
governing automatic option grants to Board members. Optionee further agrees to
be bound by the terms and conditions of the Plan and the terms and conditions of
the Option as set forth in the Automatic Stock Option Agreement attached hereto
as EXHIBIT A. Optionee hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan Summary
and Prospectus for the Plan in the form attached hereto as EXHIBIT B. A copy of
the Plan is available upon request made to the Corporate Secretary at the
Corporation's principal offices.

                  No Service Contract. No provision of this Notice of Grant, the
attached agreements or the Plan shall in any way be construed or interpreted so
as to affect adversely or otherwise impair the right of the Corporation or the
stockholders to remove Optionee
<PAGE>   2
from the Board at any time in accordance with the provisions of applicable law.


DATED: ________________ , 199_


                                              SUNSTONE HOTEL INVESTORS, INC.

                                              By:______________________________

                                                       Title:__________________


                                                       ________________________
                                                       FIELD (1), OPTIONEE

                                                       Address:________________
                                                               ________________


EXHIBIT A:  STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT B:  PLAN SUMMARY AND PROSPECTUS
<PAGE>   3
                                    EXHIBIT A

                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


                                      
<PAGE>   4
                                    EXHIBIT B

                           PLAN SUMMARY AND PROSPECTUS
#### Application of Cecil YARBROUGH for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. A-12307.

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma.

March 21, 1956.

*827Cecil Yarbrough, pro se.

Mac Q. Williamson, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

JONES, Presiding Judge.

This is an original action in habeas corpus instituted by the petitioner, Cecil Yar-brough, for the purpose of securing his release from confinement in the state penitentiary.

The accused is not wholly unknown to this court. Yarbrough v. State, 90 Okl.Cr. 74, 210 P.2d 375; Yarbrough v. State, Okl.Cr., 291 P.2d 369. The last of those cases was decided by this court on December 7, 1955, and involved the identical subject matter which is presented in the action herein. In addition to the matters already presented and discussed in the opinion filqd m said cause, the petitioner now alleges that he was without the aid of counsel for the reason that the attorney which he employed failed to properly protect his rights and prepare a record to present his case on appeal.

The allegations of the petition with reference to the counsel who appeared for the accused in the trial court are absolutely false. The complete record was before us on appeal and counsel, although faced with a hopeless case, did all that could have been expected of him on behalf of the accused and on appeal he filed an able brief presenting some novel questions of law. See Yarbrough v. State, Okl.Cr., 291 P.2d 369, supra.

Where a person has been tried and convicted and his case considered on appeal, he will not be allowed again to present the same issues raised on the appeal by habeas corpus. De Wolf v. State, 96 Okl.Cr. 382, 256 P.2d 191.

The writ of habeas corpus is denied.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EvergreenBancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gordon D. Browning, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

/s/ Gordon D. Browning
----------------------------------------------------
Gordon D. Browning
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2006

                                       30