alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold SMITH, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7557.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 8, 2003.

Decided Feb. 3, 2003.

Harold Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William Corley Lucius, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Harold Smith, Jr., a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) as successive. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2255 motion solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), *cert. denied,*534 U.S. 941, 122 S.Ct. 318, 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Smith has not made the requisite showing. *See United States v. Smith,*Nos. CR-85-166; CA-02-2456-613AK (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2002). According*196ly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PROFESSIONALS INSURANCE COMPANY MANAGEMENT
GROUP AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED (IN THOUSANDS).
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           313,633
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       2,831
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      442
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 342,561
<CASH>                                           2,176
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 267
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           1,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 413,195
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                239,151
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             21,665
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  15,300
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 22,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,506
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   413,195
<PREMIUMS>                                      71,968
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             18,719
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (207)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,169
<BENEFITS>                                      57,630
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            20,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,907
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,881
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,026
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,026
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.14
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 219,919
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             83,466
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                             (26,341)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              10,512
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                32,015
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                239,151
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM STANCIL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 410 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

. Application to Withdraw as Counsel is DENIED as moot.
#### Keith D. WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. STATE STREET BANK & TRUST CO., et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 02-1535.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Jan. 31, 2003.

Keith D. Washington, on brief, pro se.

Edward P. O’Leary and Fitzhugh, Parker & Alvaro, LLP, on brief, for appellee, The Prudential Insurance Company of America.

Mary E. O’Neal and Masterman, Cul-bert & Tully, LLP, on brief, for appellees, State Street Bank & Trust Co., and State Street Bank & Trust Company As Sponsor & Fiduciary of the Short and Long Term Disability Plan.

Before LYNCH, LIPEZ and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

*Pro se*appellant Keith Washington has a timely appeal solely with respect to a March 12, 2002 order denying Washington’s motion for leave to file a summary judgment motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The motion at issue was filed over *8two years after summary judgment was granted in favor of defendants and the case was closed. The district court has denied repeated motions to reopen the case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Under the circumstances, the motion for leave to file pursuant to Rule 56(c) was properly denied.

*Affirmed.*
March 10, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

IN THE INTEREST OF M.C.R. AND F.D.R., CHILDREN, 

NO. 14-14-00560-CV 

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on April 11, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 4)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Presentation of the Board's calculation for the change in railroad productivity for the 2018-2022 averaging period.

# SUMMARY:

In a decision served on January 19, 2024, the Board proposed to adopt 1.011 (1.1% per year) as the measure of average (geometric mean) change in railroad productivity for the 2018-2022 (five-year) period. The Board's January 19, 2024 decision stated that comments may be filed addressing any perceived data and computational errors in the Board's calculation. The decision also stated that, unless a further order is issued postponing the effective date, the decision will take effect on March 1, 2024.

# DATES:

Comments are due by February 5, 2024.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Comments may be filed via e-filing on the Board's website at                         *www.stb.gov.*                         Comments must be served on all parties appearing on the service list.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245-0333. If you require accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, please call (202) 245-0245.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information is contained in                           ( print page 4649)                        the Board's decision, which is available at                     *www.stb.gov*                     under Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 4).                

Decided: January 18, 2024.

By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Oberman, Primus, and Schultz.

Kenyatta Clay,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2024-01303 Filed 1-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
ProCore Drones LLC

Mike Fett

19091 W Spring Lake Rd

Spring Lake

, Michigan 49456

mike64fett@yahoo.com

May 12 15 , 2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption no. 14252

To Whom It May Concern,

ProCore Drones LLC would like to amend Exemption No. 14252 to now include a new sUAS. The new

sUAS is a Turbo Ace Matrix Quadcopter. Please see the attached Appendix A for user manua l.

This sUAS meets all safety guidelines set forth in Exemption No. 14252.

Thank you for your time,

Mike Fett

ProCore Drones LLC

Attached: Amendment A: User ManualAppendix A: User Manual
No. 07-17-00200-CV

Endoscopy GP, LLC and 

Amarillo Endoscopy Center, L.P.

 Appellants

v.

AmeriPride Services, Inc.

 Appellee 

§

§

§

§

From the County Court at Law No. 2 

 of Potter County

July 17, 2017

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated July 17, 2017, it is ordered, adjudged 

and decreed that the judgment of the trial court be set aside and this cause be 

remanded to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement 

of the parties. 

It is further ordered that all costs on appeal should be taxed against the parties 

incurring them. 

It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that inasmuch as the judgment of the 

trial court be set aside at the parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

. It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance. 

o O o
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in these Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-71266, 33-71776, 33-72166, 33-86982,
333-03845, 333-42183, 333-53915, 333-53917 and 333-50970) and on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-55512) of The J. Jill Group, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 2001
relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 13, 2001
relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 2001
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1697

To amend the independent counsel statute to require that an individual

appointed to be an independent counsel must agree to suspend any

outside legal work or affiliation with a law firm until the individual’s

service as independent counsel is complete.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 24, 1996

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself, Mr. DASCHLE, and Mr. DORGAN) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on

Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To amend the independent counsel statute to require that

an individual appointed to be an independent counsel

must agree to suspend any outside legal work or affiliation with a law firm until the individual’s service as

independent counsel is complete.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. STANDARDS OF CONDUCT FOR INDEPENDENT

4 COUNSELS.

5 Paragraph (1) of section 594(j) of title 28, United

6 States Code, is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 1697 IS

1 ‘‘(1) RESTRICTIONS ON EMPLOYMENT WHILE

2 INDEPENDENT COUNSEL AND APPOINTEES ARE

3 SERVING.—(A) During the period in which an inde4 pendent counsel is serving under this chapter, the

5 independent counsel shall not—

6 ‘‘(i) engage in any legal work other than as

7 required for service under this chapter; or

8 ‘‘(ii) receive any compensation for

9 affiliating with or being employed by an entity

10 that provides professional legal services.

11 ‘‘(B) During the period in which an independ12 ent counsel is serving under this chapter, any person

13 associated with a firm with which such independent

14 counsel is associated, may not represent in any mat15 ter any person involved in any investigation or pros16 ecution under this chapter. During the period in

17 which any person appointed by an independent coun18 sel under subsection (c) is serving in the office of

19 independent counsel, such person may not represent

20 in any matter any person involved in any investiga21 tion or prosecution under this chapter.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 32**

AMANASU ENVIRONMENT CORPORATION**Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer			Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,			As Adopted Pursuant to			Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

		  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of          the registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's          Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Form          10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form          10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition          and results of operations of the registrant.		

 Dated: September 11, 2008
			 By: /s/ Atsushi Maki					Atsushi Maki					Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Bernard F. Denoyer, certify that:

1)    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Callisto Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2)    Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3)    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



5)    The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);



|Date: May 15, 2008 | /s/BERNARD F. DENOYERBernard F. Denoyer Senior Vice President, Finance
|------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
----

----

I Aktai, kuriuos skelbti privaloma

----

TARYBOS REGLAMENTAS (EB, EURATOMAS) Nr. 1995/2006

2006 m. gruodžio 13 d.

iš dalies keičiantis reglamentą (EB, Euratomas) Nr. 1605/2002 dėl Europos Bendrijų bendrajam biudžetui taikomo finansinio reglamento

EUROPOS SĄJUNGOS TARYBA,

atsižvelgdama į Europos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 279 straipsnį,

atsižvelgdama į Europos atominės energijos bendrijos steigimo sutartį, ypač į jos 183 straipsnį,

atsižvelgdama į Komisijos pasiūlymą,

atsižvelgdama į Europos Parlamento nuomonę (1),

atsižvelgdama į Audito Rūmų nuomonę (2),

atsižvelgdama į Europos ekonomikos ir socialinių reikalų komiteto nuomonę (3),

kadangi:

PRIĖMĖ ŠĮ REGLAMENTĄ:

1 straipsnis

Reglamentas (EB, Euratomas) Nr. 1605/2002 iš dalies keičiamas taip:

2 straipsnis

Šis reglamentas įsigalioja dvidešimtą dieną po jo paskelbimo Europos Sąjungos oficialiajame leidinyje.

Jis taikomas nuo Komisijos reglamento, iš dalies keičiančio Reglamentą (EB, Euratomas) Nr. 2342/2002, nustatantį išsamias finansinio reglamento įgyvendinimo taisykles, taikymo pradžios datos, bet ne vėliau kaip nuo 2007 m. gegužės 1 d.

Tačiau šio reglamento 80 punktas, 84–94 punktai taikomi nuo 2007 m. sausio 1 d.

Šis reglamentas privalomas visas ir tiesiogiai taikomas visose valstybėse narėse.

Priimta Briuselyje, 2006 m. gruodžio 13 d.

Tarybos vardu

Pirmininkė

E. TUOMIOJA

----

(1)  Nuomonė pareikšta 2006 m. liepos 6 d. (dar nepaskelbta Oficialiajame leidinyje).

(2)OL C 13, 2006 1 18, p. 1.

(3)OL C 28, 2006 2 3, p. 83.

(4)OL L 248, 2002 9 16, p. 1.

(5)OL L 209, 2005 8 11, p. 1.

(6)OL C 139, 2006 6 14, p. 1.

(7)OL L 134, 2004 4 30, p. 114. Direktyva su paskutiniais pakeitimais, padarytais Komisijos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 2083/2005 (OL L 333, 2005 12 20, p. 28).

(8)OL L 210, 2006 7 31, p. 82.

(9)OL L 310, 2006 11 9, p. 1.

(10)OL L 210, 2006 7 31, p. 25.

(11)OL L 281, 1995 11 23, p. 31. Direktyva su pakeitimais, padarytais Reglamentu (EB) Nr. 1882/2003 (OL L 284, 2003 10 31, p. 1).

(12)OL L 8, 2001 1 12, p. 1.“

(13)OL L 11, 2003 1 16, p. 1.“;

(14)OL L 134, 2004 4 30, p. 114. Direktyva su paskutiniais pakeitimai, padarytais Komisijos reglamentu (EB) Nr. 2083/2005 (OL L 333, 2005 12 20, p. 28).“;

(15)OL L 209, 2005 8 11, p. 1. Reglamentas su pakeitimais, padarytais Reglamentu (EB) Nr. 320/2006 (OL L 58, 2006 2 28, p. 42).“;

(16)OL L 270, 2003 10 21, p. 1. Reglamentas su paskutiniais pakeitimais, padarytais Reglamentu (EB) Nr. 1405/2006 (OL L 265, 2006 9 26, p. 1).“;

(17)  Reglamentas (EB) Nr. 1290/2005.

(18)  2006 m. liepos 5 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 1080/2006 dėl Europos regioninės plėtros fondo (OL L 210, 2006 7 31, p. 1).

(19)  2006 m. liepos 5 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 1081/2006 dėl Europos socialinio fondo (OL L 210, 2006 7 31, p. 12).

(20)  2006 m. liepos 11 d. Tarybos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 1084/2006, įsteigiantis Sanglaudos fondą (OL L 210, 2006 7 31, p. 79).

(21)  2006 m. liepos 27 d. Tarybos reglamentas (EB) Nr. 1198/2006 dėl Europos žuvininkystės fondo (OL L 223, 2006 8 15, p. 1).“

(22)OL L 210, 2006 7 31, p. 82.

(23)OL L 310, 2006 11 9, p. 1.“

----
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 18, 2009

d0311 

# Order

March 18, 2009

137709

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137709 COA: 287052 Barry CC: 07-000064-FC RICHARD WILLIAM MEXICO, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 25, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented shou ld be reviewed by this Court.
----

 

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of First National Power Corporation,a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter endingMarch 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Peter Wanner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Peter Wanner                       ***

Peter Wanner, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: August 2, 2005

----