alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                   MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                LEGAL ENTITY                    INCORPORATION                          OWNERSHIP
--------------------------------------------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                           <C>                 <C>
Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.                     Michigan, USA

MDI International, Inc.                       Michigan, USA       100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics Ltd.                      Canada              100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics FSC, Inc.                 Barbados            100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics GmbH                      Germany             100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics SarL                      France              100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics International, Ltd.       United Kingdom      100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics Sweden AB                 Sweden              100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics Italy srl                 Italy               100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

DTI Asia Pte. Ltd.                            Singapore           100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics Japan K.K.                Japan               66% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

Mechanical Dynamics s.r.o.                    Czech Republic      100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.

ESTECH Corporation                            Japan               100% owned by Mechanical Dynamics, Inc.
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EvergreenBancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Gerald O. HatlerGerald O. HatlerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, v. Victor LORIANO, a/k/a Liriano-Alvedo Jose Morgan; Tony Moreno; Manuel Soto; Shorty, Appellant.

No. 91-3217.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 13, 1993.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Before EDWARDS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on .the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and was argued by counsel. The matter is also before the court on appellant’s petition for rehearing, the response thereto and the reply. On consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED, by the Court, that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby reversed.

The Clerk is directed to promptly issue the court’s mandate.
### NUMBER 13

- 11

- 00 179

- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ BEVERLY PIRKLE AND STEPHEN O. PIRKLE , A ppellants ,

v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ND D / B / A ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICES , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 2nd 25 th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant s , Beverly Pirkle and Stephen O. Pirkle , perfected an appeal from a
judgment entered by the 2nd 25 th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas, in cause

number 24,180 . Appellant s have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal with prejudice on2

grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their
differences. Appellant s request that this Court dismiss the ap peal with prejudice

. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants ’ amended
motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellants ’ amended motion to dismiss is grant ed, and the
appeal is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE . In accordance with the agreement of
the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d)
("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
Having di smissed the appeal at appellant s ’ request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 30th day of August , 20 12

.
#### William HARRISON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald JONES, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 02-7376.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 24, 2003.

Decided Feb. 10, 2003.

*671William Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Diane Appelton Reeves, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

William Harrison seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). To be entitled to a certificate of appealability, Harrison must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). When a district court dismisses solely on procedural grounds, the petitioner “must demonstrate both (1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right,’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’ ” *Rose v. Lee*252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.2001) (quoting *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)). Upon examination of Harrison’s petition, we cannot conclude that reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether the district court correctly concluded the petition was untimely filed.* Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See Harrison v. Jones,*No. CA-99-109-5-2MU (W.D.N.C. filed Aug. 30, 2002, entered Sept. 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

 Because the district court correctly found that Harrison's petition was time-barred, we do not address the court’s additional holding that the petition was without merit.
---

---

# Exhibit 10.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (file No.
333-134591), Form F-3 (File No. 333-114153) and on Form S-8 (File No.333-12456) of Elbit
Vision Systems Ltd. (the Company) of our report dated July 14, 2005,
which appears in the Companys 2005 Anuual Report on Form 20-F.

|Haifa, IsraelJune 28, 2006 |  | /s/ KESSELMAN & KESSELMAN
Kesselman & KesselmanCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                                QUIKSILVER, INC.
 
                    NAMES AND JURISDICTIONS OF SUBSIDIARIES
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                SUBSIDIARY NAME                           JURISDICTION
                                ---------------                           ------------
        <S>                                                               <C>
        Na Pali, S.A...................................................    France
        The Raisin Company, Inc........................................    California
        ATI Apparel Trade International................................    California
        QS International, Inc..........................................    California
</TABLE>
#### Mark H. Buzby et al., executors of Mary M. Wilkins, deceased, appellants, *v.*Henry Darnell, guardian of Joshua W. Hurley, respondent.

On appeal from a decree of the ordinary, whose opinion is reported in *Darnell*v. *Buzby, 5 Dick. Ch. Rep. 725.*

*Mr. Mark R. Sooy,*for the appellants.

*Mr. Jerome B. Grigg*and *Mr. Samuel H. Grey,*for the respondent.

*338Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the ordinary.

*For affirmance*— Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Yan Syckel, Brown, Krueger — 7.

*For reversal*— Dixon, Bogert — 2.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry Gabby, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Terry Gabby

Terry Gabby

Chief Financial Officer

May 20, 2008
----

----

I Akti, katerih objava je obvezna

----

UREDBA SVETA (ES, EURATOM) št. 1995/2006

z dne 13. decembra 2006

o spremembah Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti

SVET EVROPSKE UNIJE JE –

ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, zlasti člena 279 Pogodbe,

ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo, zlasti člena 183 Pogodbe,

ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije,

ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega parlamenta (1),

ob upoštevanju mnenja Računskega sodišča (2),

ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora (3),

ob upoštevanju naslednjega:

SPREJEL NASLEDNJO UREDBO:

Člen 1

Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 se spremeni, kakor sledi:

Člen 2

Ta uredba začne veljati dvajseti dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.

Uporabljati se začne od datuma začetka uporabljanja Uredbe Komisije o spremembah Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje finančne uredbe in ne pozneje kot 1. maja 2007.

Vendar se točka 80 in točke od 84 do 94 člena 1 te uredbe začnejo uporabljati s 1. januarjem 2007.

Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah.

V Bruslju, 13. decembra 2006.

Za Svet

Predsednik

E. TUOMIOJA

----

(1)  Mnenje z dne 6. julija 2006 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).

(2)UL C 13, 18.1.2006, str. 1.

(3)UL C 28, 3.2. 2006, str. 83.

(4)UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str. 1.

(5)UL L 209, 11.8.2005, str. 1.

(6)UL C 139, 14.6.2006, str. 1.

(7)UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str. 114. Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2083/2005 (UL L 333, 20.12.2005, str. 28).

(8)UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str. 82.

(9)UL L 310, 9.11.2006, str. 1.

(10)UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str. 25.

(11)UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str. 31. Direktiva, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1882/2003 (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str. 1).

(12)UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str. 1.“

(13)UL L 11, 16.1.2003, str. 1.“;

(14)UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str. 114. Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2083/2005 (UL L 333, 20.12.2005, str. 28).“;

(15)UL L 209, 11.8.2005, str. 1. Uredba, kakor je bila spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 320/2006 (UL L 58, 28.2.2006, str. 42).“;

(16)UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str. 1. Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1405/2006 (UL L 265, 26.9.2006, str. 1).“;

(17)  Uredba (ES) št. 1290/2005.

(18)  Uredba (ES) št. 1080/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj (UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str. 1).

(19)  Uredba (ES) št. 1081/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. julija 2006 o Evropskem socialnem skladu (UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str. 12).

(20)  Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1084/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o ustanovitvi Kohezijskega sklada (UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str. 79).

(21)  Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 z dne 27. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za ribištvo (UL L 223, 15.8.2006, str. 1)“

(22)UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str. 82.

(23)UL L 310, 9.11.2006, str. 1.“

----
Petition Dismissed, Appeal Dismissed , and Memorandum Opinion filed June 4, 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00295

- CV

KHYATI UNDAVIA, MINU RX LT D , AND MINU GP, LLC , Appellant s

V.

AVANT MEDICAL GROUP, P.A. D/B/A INTERVENTIONAL SPINE ASSOCIATES AND BRETT L. GARNER D/B/A ALLIED MEDICAL CENTERS , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 22186

MEM ORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Khyati Undavia, Minu RX, Ltd., and MINU GP, LLC bring this permissive interlocutory appeal of the March 20, 2015 partial denial of their motion for summary judge in favor appellees Avant Medical Group, P.A. d/b/a

Interventional Spine Associates and Brett L. Garner d/b/a Allied Medical Centers.2 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014( d) (West 2015).

On March 20, 2015, the trial court signed the order granting appellants ’

motion for permission to appeal the order partially denying their motion for summary judgment. Relators filed their petition for permission to appeal the March 20, 2015 order in this court. Subsequently, on April 24, 2015, the trial court signed an amended order, superseding the March 20, 2015 order. The April 24, 2015 order renders the petition for permission to appeal and this appeal moot.

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition and the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher

, Brown , and Wise.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned, Ray J. Oleson, the Chief Executive Officer of SI International,Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this certification in connection with thefiling with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2004 (the “Report”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| November  4, 2004 |                       | SI  INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|-------------------|----------------------------|-------------------------|
|              |                       |
|              |                       |
|              | /s/ Ray J. Oleson          |                    |
|              | Ray  J. Oleson             |
|              | Chairman  of the Board and |
|              | Chief  Executive Officer   |

 

----

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Theundersigned, Thomas E. Dunn, the Chief Financial Officer of SI International,Inc. (the “Company”), has executed this certification in connection with thefiling with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 25, 2004 (the “Report”).  The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

(1)           the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)           the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| November  4, 2004 |                                   | SI  INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|              |                                   |
|              |                                   |
|              | /s/ Thomas E. Dunn                     |                    |
|              | Thomas  E. Dunn                        |
|              | Executive  Vice President,             |
|              | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, theChief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Gladstone CapitalCorporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March31, 2007 (“Form 10-Q”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information containedin the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  May 2, 2007
|                          |   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------|
| /s/ David  Gladstone     |   |   |
| David Gladstone          |   |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer |   |   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

The following certificationaccompanies the issuer’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB and is not filed, asprovided in Release 33-8212.  34-47551dated May 13, 2003.

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theaccompanying quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarterended September 30, 2003, I, Thomas J. Sherman, Chief Financial Officer ofCoast Bancorp, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  suchquarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorp for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Coast Bancorpfor the quarter ended September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coast Bancorp.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coast Bancorpand will be retained by Coast Bancorp and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
| Dated:  November  12, 2003 |                                                                       |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                                                       |
|                                 |                                                                       |
|                                 | /s/ Thomas  J. Sherman                                                     |   |
|                                 | Thomas J.  Sherman  Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1 – SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant
 to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 
 
 I, Antonio Treminio, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer of NOVO ENERGIES CORPORATION. (the “Company”), certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)

the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: August 19, 2009
 /s/ Antonio Treminio
 Antonio Treminio
 Chief Executive Officer,
 Acting Principal Accounting Officer