alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1863 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1863

 To require the Secretary of the Army to acquire permanent flowage and 
   saturation easements over land that is located within the 10-year 
  floodplain of the James River, South Dakota, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 1996

  Mr. Daschle introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of the Army to acquire permanent flowage and 
   saturation easements over land that is located within the 10-year 
  floodplain of the James River, South Dakota, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACQUISITION OF EASEMENTS OVER LAND NEAR JAMES RIVER, SOUTH 
              DAKOTA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Army shall acquire, from 
willing sellers, permanent flowage and saturation easements over land 
that is located within the 10-year floodplain of the James River, South 
Dakota.
    (b) Scope.--
            (1) In general.--The easements acquired by the Secretary of 
        the Army under subsection (a) shall include the right, power, 
        and privilege of the Federal Government to submerge, overflow, 
        percolate, and saturate the surface and subsurface of the land 
        and such other terms and conditions as the Secretary of the 
        Army considers appropriate.
            (2) Haying and grazing.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
        permit haying and grazing on the land subject to the easements.
    (c) Payment.--In acquiring the easements under subsection (a), the 
Secretary of the Army shall pay an amount based on the unaffected fee 
value of the land subject to the easements. For the purpose of this 
subsection, the unaffected fee value of the land is the value that the 
land would have if the land were unaffected by rising ground water and 
surface flooding associated with the James River.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000, to remain available 
until expended.
                                 <all>
```
# Uradni list L 30/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0804 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | L 30 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Zakonodaja | Letnik 633. februar 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0804

Uradni list

Evropske unije

L 30

Slovenska izdaja

Zakonodaja

Letnik 633. februar 2020

---

| Vsebina | | Popravki | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Popravek Sklepa Sveta (EU) 2019/1815 z dne 24. oktobra 2019 o imenovanju dveh članov in treh nadomestnih članov Odbora regij na predlog Republike Slovenije ( UL L 278 30.10.2019 ) | 1 |

Vsebina

Popravki

Stran

*

Popravek Sklepa Sveta (EU) 2019/1815 z dne 24. oktobra 2019 o imenovanju dveh članov in treh nadomestnih članov Odbora regij na predlog Republike Slovenije ( UL L 278 30.10.2019 )

( UL L 278 30.10.2019 )

1

| SL | Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.
  Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica. |
| --- | --- |

SL

Akti z rahlo natisnjenimi naslovi so tisti, ki se nanašajo na dnevno upravljanje kmetijskih zadev in so splošno veljavni za omejeno obdobje.

Naslovi vseh drugih aktov so v mastnem tisku in pred njimi stoji zvezdica.

---

Popravki

| 3.2.2020 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | L 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

L 30/1

---

Popravek Sklepa Sveta (EU) 2019/1815 z dne 24. oktobra 2019 o imenovanju dveh članov in treh nadomestnih članov Odbora regij na predlog Republike Slovenije

(
  Uradni list Evropske unije L 278 z dne 30. oktobra 2019
  )

Stran 12, člen 1, točka (b), prva alinea:

besedilo:

| „— | Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

Aleksander Saša ARESNOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,“

župan Mestne občine Maribor

se glasi:

| „— | Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,“. |
| --- | --- |

„—

Aleksander Saša ARSENOVIČ, župan Mestne občine Maribor,“.

župan Mestne občine Maribor

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AL P I E R R O, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. C OMMI S S I ON E R OF I NT E RNA L RE VENU E, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 70074 T a x C t . N o. 18809- 07 ME MOR AN DU M *

A ppe a l f r om aD e c i s i on of

the U ni t ed S t at es T ax C ou rt S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an d B Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A l P i e rr o appe a l s pr o s e f r om the T a x C ourt ’ s de c i s i on uphol di ng the C o m m is s io n e ro f

I n te rn a l R e v e n u e ’s d e te rm in a tio n o f ad e f ic ie n c ya n d a d d itio n s to ta x f o rta x y e a r2 0 0 2 . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 6 U .S .C . § 7 4 8 2 ( a ) ( 1 ) . W e 

# FI LED MA R 06 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 70074 2 re vi ew de no vo the T ax C ou rt ’ s l egal concl usi on s, and for cl ear e rr or i t s f ac tual f in d in g s . H

ardy v. C om m ’r , 1 8 1 F .3 d 1 0 0 2 , 1 0 0 4 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 9 ) . W e a f f irm . T he T a x C ourtpr ope r l yuphe l d the C om m i s s i one r ’ s t a x de t e rm i na t i on because the evi dence attri al es t abl i shed that$1 2, 50 0 w as pai d t o the Int ernal R evenue S ervi ce (“ IR S ”) on P i erro’ s behal f i n 2 00 2, bu the di d n otfi l e at ax re turn f o rth a t y e a ro rp a yth e ta x e s d u e o n th a t a m o u n t. See O ld C olony T rust C o. v. C om m ’r , 2 7 9 U .S . 7 1 6 , 7 2 9 (1 9 2 9 ) ( p ay m en ts m ad e d irec tl y to IR S o n tax p ay er ’s b e h a lf c o n s titu te ta x ab le in c o m e to th e ta x p a y e r ) ; s e e al s o 26 U . S . C . § 6 65 1(a) (1), ( a ) ( 2 ) ( p r o v id in g f

o ra d d itio n s to ta x w h e r e ta x p a y e rf a ils , w ith o u t r e a s o n ab le cause, t i m el y t o fi l e at ax re turn o r t o p aythe t axes du e) . P i erro’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1875 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 615
104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1875

 To designate the United States courthouse in Medford, Oregon, as the 
                ``James A. Redden Federal Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 1996

Mr. Hatfield (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

                           September 18, 1996

               Reported by Mr. Chafee, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the United States courthouse in Medford, Oregon, as the 
                ``James A. Redden Federal Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 310 West Sixth Street in Medford, 
Oregon, shall be known and designated as the ``James A. Redden Federal 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James A. Redden 
Federal Courthouse''.
                                     

                                                       Calendar No. 615

104th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1875

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the United States courthouse in Medford, Oregon, as the 
                ``James A. Redden Federal Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 10, 1996

                       Reported without amendment
```
Home | Search | Site Map | Contact Us

 

Publications

SWFSC

8604 La Jolla Shores Drive

La Jolla, CA 92037-1508

ph: (858) 546-7000

fx: (858) 546-7003

SWFSC Fisheries Ecology Publication Search

To obtain copies of publications, please contact the SWFSC Santa Cruz Librarian

Search the Index Catalog

 Lab Contribution #

 

 Keyword(Title, Journal Name or Author)

 with all of the words

 with at least one of the words

 with the exact phrase

 

Publication Year

(hold down SHIFT or CTRL key for multiple selection)

 (e.g. 1995, 2002-2005)

 

 Sort by

Publication Year

Author

Search

Last modified: 3/7/2011 11:50:46 AM

Home | Site Map | Glossary | FAQs | Links | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer |

Fisheries Ecology

Division Publications

Search Fisheries Ecology

Division Publications

Search SWFSC Technical

Memorandums

ABOUT US DIVISIONS RESEARCH SPECIES PUBLICATIONS DATA PORTAL EDUCATION MULTIMEDIA GALLERY

SWFSC - Fisheries Ecology Division Publications Search Page 1 of 1

http://swfsc.noaa.gov//publications/fedbin/qrypublications.asp?ParentMenuId=54 3/7/2011
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose RAMOS-ESCOBAR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-50385.

D.C. No. CR-01-02966-JMF.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 13, 2003.*

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Ramos-Escobar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry in violation of *4698 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for harmless error whether the district court denied Ramos-Escobar the right of allocution. *United States v. Leasure,*122 F.3d 837, 840 (9th Cir.1997). We affirm.

Ramos-Escobar’s contention that he was denied the right of allocution lacks merit because the record shows that he was provided an opportunity to address the district court before it imposed sentence. *See*Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3); *Leasure,*122 F.3d at 840 (stating “that Rule 32 may be satisfied by allowing a defendant an opportunity to make a statement before the end of sentencing but after the court has indicated its tentative conclusions on sentencing”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9893-9894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03681]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List, Proposed Deletions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed deletions from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to delete products from the 
Procurement List that was previously furnished by a nonprofit agency 
employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    Comments must be received on or before: 3/24/2014.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 10800, Arlington, Virginia, 
22202-4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Deletions

    The following products are proposed for deletion from the 
Procurement List:

Products

Bag, Plastic

NSN: 8105-LL-N77-1370
NSN: 8105-LL-N78-1252
NSN: 8105-LL-N86-0770
NSN: 8105-LL-N86-0771
NSN: 8105-LL-N91-2391
NSN: 8105-LL-N91-2392
NSN: 8105-LL-N91-2393
NSN: 8105-LL-N91-2394

[[Page 9894]]

NPA: UNKNOWN
Contracting Activity: Dept. of the Navy, U.S. Fleet Forces Command, 
Norfolk, VA.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-03681 Filed 2-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David M. SCATES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7712.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 5, 2003.

David M. Scates, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Noelle Dalrymple, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

David M. Scates seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Scates has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Scates,*Nos. CR-98-87; CA-01-750 (E.D.Va. Oct. 29, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
#### In re Stephen E. McCLELLAND, Petitioner.

No. 02-7425.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 5, 2002.

Decided Jan. 22, 2003.

Stephen E. McClelland, Petitioner Pro Se.

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

*144PER CURIAM.

Stephen E. McClelland petitions for a writ of mandamus. He seeks an order compelling the state court to consider an untimely appeal from a criminal conviction.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. *See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn.,*860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. *See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court,*426 U.S. 394, 402, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976); *In re Beard,*811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir.1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. *See In re United Steelworkers,*595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir.1979). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, *see Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County,*411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir.1969), and does not have jurisdiction to review state court orders, *see District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman,*460 U.S. 462, 482, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983).

The relief sought by McClelland is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED.*
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1543

AN ACT

To clarify the treatment of Nebraska impact aid payments.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1543 ES

1 SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF IMPACT AID PAYMENTS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Education shall

3 treat any State as having met the requirements of section

4 5(d)(2)(A) of Public Law 81–874 for fiscal year 1991, and

5 as not having met those requirements for each of the fiscal

6 years 1992, 1993, and 1994, if—

7 (1) its program of State aid was not certified

8 by the Secretary under section 5(d)(2(C)(i) of Public

9 Law 81–874 for any fiscal year before fiscal year

10 1991;

11 (2) the State submitted timely notice under

12 that section of its intention to seek that certification;

13 (3) the Secretary determined that the State did

14 not meet the requirements of section 5(d)(2)(A) of

15 Public Law 81–874 for fiscal year 1991; and

16 (4) it has made a payment to each local edu17 cational agency in the State, other than any local

18 educational agency that received a payment for fiscal

19 year 1991 under section 3(d)(2)(B) of Public Law

20 81–874, whose State aid it reduced for that fiscal

21 year, in the full amount of that reduction.

22 (b) REPAYMENT NOT REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding

23 any other provision of law, any local educational agency

24 in such a State that received funds under section

25 3(d)(2)(B) of Public Law 81–874 for fiscal year 1991
3

S 1543 ES

1 shall not, by virtue of subsection (a), be required to repay

2 those funds to the Secretary.

Passed the Senate January 26, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1543

AN ACT

To clarify the treatment of Nebraska impact aid

payments.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             May 15, 2009

Date
    
    By
    
    /s/ Kent W. Peters

Kent W. Peters
    
    Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 7.1
                                                                TO ANNUAL REPORT
                                                                    ON FORM 20-F


    STATEMENT EXPLAINING HOW CERTAIN RATIOS WERE CALCULATED IN ANNUAL REPORT


1.   The operating ratio of Guangshen Railway is the percentage of its total
     railway operating expenses in 2002 (in the amount of RMB1,735.3 million, as
     opposed to RMB1,460.6 million in 2001) to Guangshen Railway's total railway
     revenues in 2002 (in the amount of RMB2,360.6 million, as opposed to
     RMB1,993.3 million in 2001).

2.   Guangshen Railway's total railway operating income ratio is 1 minus the
     operating ratio.

3.   Guangshen Railway's overall operating income ratio is 1 minus the
     percentage of its operating costs in 2002 (in the amount of RMB1,895.0
     million, as opposed to RMB1,599.5 million in 2001) to the business revenues
     in 2002 (in the amount of RMB2,517.5 million, as opposed to RMB2,153.6
     million in 2001).
**EXHIBIT 10-p-2**Schedule identifying agreements substantially identical to the form of Indemnity Agreementconstituting Exhibit 10-p-1 hereto entered into by Conexant Systems, Inc. and each of the followingpersonsNameDonald R. BeallSteven J. BilodeauDwight W. DeckerF. Craig FarrillBalakrishnan S. IyerJohn W. MarrenD. Scott MercerJerre L. SteadGiuseppe ZoccoJ. Scott BlouinJasmina T. BoulangerLewis C. BrewsterDennis E. O’ReillyKerry K. PetryF. Matthew RhodesMichael J. RispoliDan ArtusiRalph CiceroneDipanjan DebArmando Geday
 

 
Karen RoscherMichael Vishny
2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with this annual report of Rush Enterprises, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, W. M. “Rusty” Rush, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By:    | /S/ W. M.  “RUSTY” RUSH      |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | W. M. “Rusty”  Rush          |
|   | Title: | President and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:  | March 13,  2009                   |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 TIMCO Aviation Services, Inc.
 
 NEWS
 Release:
    
    April 21, 2006Contact:
    
    Roy T. Rimmer, Jr., Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
James Tate, Executive Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer
          and Chief Financial Officer
(336) 668-4410
 TIMCO AVIATION SERVICES, INC. REPORTS ON NEW LOAN AGREEMENTS AND THE
APPOINTMENT OF A NEW CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 Greensboro, North Carolina, April 21, 2006  TIMCO Aviation Services, Inc. (OTCBB:TMAV)




---



##### 



TIMCO AVIATION SERVICES, INC. REPORTS ON
NEW LOAN AGREEMENTS AND THE APPOINTMENT
OF A NEW CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 Page 2
    www.timco.aero
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of microHelix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tyram H. Pettit,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Tyram H. Pettit
------------------------------------
Tyram H. Pettit
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
August 13, 2003


                                       17
Exhibit 99.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Webtronics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Yanina Wachtfogel, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Yanina Wachtfogel
---------------------
Yanina Wachtfogel
President

November 14, 2002