alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exh4-4.htm


Exhibit 4.4


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


PLEDGE AND SECURITY AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment, dated January 26, 2012 is delivered pursuant to Section 4.4 of the Agreement referred to below.  All defined terms herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto or incorporated by reference in the Agreement.  The undersigned hereby certifies that the representations and warranties in Article III of the Agreement are and continue to be true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof, except to the extent such representations and warranties expressly relate to an earlier date, in which case such representations and warranties shall have been true and correct in all material respects as of such date.  The undersigned further agrees that this Amendment may be attached to that certain Pledge and Security Agreement, dated February 4, 2011, between the undersigned, as the Grantors, and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, in its capacity as trustee and Note Collateral Agent (the “Agreement”) and that the Collateral listed on Schedule I to this Amendment shall be and become a part of the Collateral referred to in said Agreement and shall secure all Secured Obligations referred to in said Agreement.


 


 




	
WESTMORELAND COAL COMPANY,


a Delaware corporation


	 
	 
	
By: /s/ Jennifer S. Grafton


Name: Jennifer S. Grafton


Title:   General Counsel and Secretary
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Stuart Oland Wheeler

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00868

- CR

Trial court case number: 2014V

- 0074

Trial court: 155th District Court of Austin County

On De cember 18, 2014, Stuart Oland Wheeler filed a Motion for More Time to File

Brief. The motion is GRANTED . Wheeler’s brief is due January 2, 2014. The response from

the State of Texas, if any, is due January 22, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature :

__

/s/

_ Rebeca Huddle

X A cting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 30, 2014
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-50V

UNPUBLISHED

SUSAN MARTIN,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: September 21, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Pneumococcal 

Conjugate Vaccine; Shoulder Injury 

Related to Vaccine Administration 

(SIRVA)

Theodore J. Hong, Maglio Christopher & Toale, PA, Seattle, WA, for petitioner.

James Vincent Lopez, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On January 9, 2019, Susan Martin filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of a Prevnar 13 pneumococcal conjugate vaccine 

administered on April 3, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 10, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) 

Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent concludes that “Petitioner suffered SIRVA as 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa 

(2012).
2

defined by the Vaccine Injury Table.” Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that “Petitioner 

suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14



                PRENTISS PROPERTIES ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P.


   Fourth Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
         Partnership of Prentiss Properties Acquisition Partners, L.P.


                                   RECITALS


          A.  Belair Real Estate Corporation ("Assignor") desires to assign and
                                               --------
Belcrest Realty Corporation ("Assignee") desires to acquire 190,000 Series B
                              --------
Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Units (the "Series B Preferred Units")
                                                      ------------------------
of Prentiss Properties Acquisition Partners, L.P. (the "Partnership").
                                                        -----------

          B.  Pursuant to Article XI of the Second Amended and Restated
Agreement of Limited Partnership, as amended (as so amended, the "Agreement"),
                                                                  ---------
of the Partnership, Prentiss Properties I, Inc. as the sole general partner of
the Partnership (the "General Partner"), desires to amend the Agreement to admit
                      ---------------
Assignee as a Substitute Limited Partner with respect to the Assigned Units.

          NOW, THEREFORE, the General Partner hereby adopts the following
amendment to the Agreement.

          1.  Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its
entirety as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto.
                         ---------

          2.  Assignee accepts and agrees to be bound by the terms and
provisions of the Agreement.


                           [Signature Page Follows]
<PAGE>

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the General Partner and Assignee have executed
this Fourth Amendment as of April 29, 1999.

                         GENERAL PARTNER

                         PRENTISS PROPERTIES I, INC.



                         By: /s/ Michael A. Ernst
                             -------------------------------------------
                             Name:  Michael A. Ernst
                             Title: Chief Financial Officer


                         ASSIGNEE AND SUBSTITUTE LIMITED PARTNER:

                         BELCREST REALTY CORPORATION


                         By: /s/ Thomas E. Faust
                             -------------------------------------------
                             Name:  Thomas E. Faust
                             Title: Executive Vice President
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David A. Rector, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of ZipRealty, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of ZipRealty, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  |                                                                  
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David A. Rector
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                     |  | David A. Rector Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by
ZipRealty, Inc. and will be retained by ZipRealty, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
      32


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
      the
      registrant certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the registrant's
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Form
      10-QSB") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form
      10-QSB, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the registrant.





Date:
                November 14, 2006Amanasu
                Environment Corporation/s/
                Atsushi MakiAtsushi
                MakiCEO,
                CFO, CAO
Telephone Log

Date: November 17, 2010 Call between Margaret Sheppard, EPA and Mary Koban, DuPont Fluoroproducts Re: Unique Fittings for HFO

- 1234y f Mary Kob an contacted Margaret Sheppard in response to a suggestion from Dr. Chris Seeton to address an y p otential concerns from EPA about unique service fittings for HFO

- 1234y f. Ms. Sheppard explained that existing EPA regulations under SNAP require unique service fittings. Ty picall y, EPA will list unique fittings for the high side and low side service port s, for large size professional containers for servicing (e.g., 30 lb cylinders), and for small can taps, t ypicall y used for do

- it

- yo urself servicing. Ms. Koban explained that SAE and DuPont have done considerable work to ensure there are workable, unique fittings. DuPont is doing its own testing and plans to share that information and make it available to an yone interested. Mary Koban also explained that work for the fittings for 30 lb cylinders and for other professional service containers will be based on the dimensions for the fittings for the low

- side service port. She suggested that EPA consult with the chair of the SAE committee addressing the SAE J 639 standard. Ms. Koban suggested that ideally , a final SNAP rule would reference the unique fittin gs in SAE J 639.
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 153 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 153

       To reduce Federal spending and enhance military satellite 
 communications by reducing funds for the MILSTAR II Satellite Program 
  and accelerating plans for deployment of the Advanced EHF Satellite/
                              MILSTAR III.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 5, 1995

 Mr. Bumpers  (for himself, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Feingold, Mr. 
 Harkin, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Simon, and Mr. Wellstone) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To reduce Federal spending and enhance military satellite 
 communications by reducing funds for the MILSTAR II Satellite Program 
  and accelerating plans for deployment of the Advanced EHF Satellite/
                              MILSTAR III.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Satellite Communications 
Enhancement Act of 1995''.

SEC 2. TERMINATION OF THE MILSTAR II SATELLITE PROGRAM.

    (a) Termination of Program.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
terminate the MILSTAR II communications satellite development and 
acquisition program after procurement of a total of two MILSTAR II 
satellites. No funds appropriated to the Department of Defense may be 
obligated for development or acquisition of MILSTAR II satellites other 
than the first two MILSTAR II satellites.
    (b) Advanced EHF Satellite Program.--
            (1) The Secretary of Defense shall develop a program to 
        accelerate development, acquisition and deployment of the 
        Advanced Extremely High Frequency Communications Satellite/
        MILSTAR III, small enough to be launched on a medium-launch 
        vehicle.
            (2) Not later than ninety days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a 
        report on the program developed under paragraph (1). The report 
        shall describe the proposed scope, pace and cost of 
        acquisition, of a constellation of Advanced EHF satellites.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of In Veritas Medical Diagnostics,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Martin E. Thorp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to In Veritas  Medical  Diagnostics,  Inc.  and will be retained by In
Veritas Medical  Diagnostics,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.






December 15, 2006                                    /s/ Martin E. Thorp
                                                     -------------------
                                                     Martin E. Thorp
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: __2011________-NM-____093______-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit
32.2
 
 
 Certification
of Vice-Chairman, President and Co - Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Century Casinos, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 
 
 Date:
April 15, 2005
 
 
 _________________
 Peter
Hoetzinger
 Vice-Chairman,
President and Co - Chief Executive Officer
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1545

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise

trade for the vessel MOONRAKER, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 30, 1996

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a

certificate of documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the vessel

MOONRAKER, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

4 Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine

5 Act, 1920 (46 U.S.C. App. 883), section 8 of the Act of

6 June 19, 1886 (24 Stat. 81, chapter 421; 46 U.S.C. App.

7 289), and sections 12106 through 12108 of title 46,

8 United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation may
2

•S 1545 IS

1 issue a certificate of documentation with appropriate en2 dorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the

3 vessel MOONRAKER, United States official number

4 645981.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 156 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 156

  To reduce Federal spending by limiting the amount of appropriations 
 which may be available to the intelligence community for fiscal year 
                                 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 5, 1995

 Mr. Bumpers (for himself, Mr. Bradley, Mr. Feingold, Mr. Harkin, Mr. 
Kohl, Mr. Pryor, Mr. Simon, and Mr. Wellstone) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reduce Federal spending by limiting the amount of appropriations 
 which may be available to the intelligence community for fiscal year 
                                 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Spending Reduction Through 
Intelligence Programs Reduction Act of 1995''.

SEC. 2. PROGRAM REDUCTION.

    Funds appropriated to carry out the activities of the intelligence 
community for fiscal year 1996 may not exceed an amount equal to the 
amount appropriated to carry out such activities for fiscal year 1995, 
minus $1,000,000,000.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    For purposes of this Act, the term ``intelligence community'' has 
the meaning given that term in section 3(4) of the National Security 
Act of 1947.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott H. Ray, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

(a)   the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Online, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|Date: October 30, 2007                                                           |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/SCOTT H. RAYScott H. Ray Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
# C_2009233EN.01001701.xml

| 26.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/17

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2009 — Timmer v Court of Auditors

(Case T-340/08 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Staff cases - Officials - Staff reporting - New and substantial facts - Appeal manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part)

2009/C 233/30

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Marianne Timmer (Saint-Sauves-d’Auvergne, France) (represented by: F. Rollinger, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Auditors of the European Communities (represented by: T. Kennedy, J.-M. Steiner and G. Corstens, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 5 June 2008 in Case F-123/06 Timmer v Court of Auditors, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking annulment of that order.

Timmer

Court of Auditors

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Marianne Timmer is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those of the Court of Auditors of the European Communities in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Marianne Timmer is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those of the Court of Auditors of the European Communities in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.

1

---