alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Bernard Denoyer, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Callisto
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: July 2, 2004


                                              /s/ Bernard Denoyer
                                              -------------------
                                              Bernard Denoyer
                                              Principal Financial Officer
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1903

AN ACT

To designate the bridge, estimated to be completed in the

year 2000, that replaces the bridge on Missouri highway

74 spanning from East Cape Girardeau, Illinois, to Cape

Girardeau, Missouri, as the ‘‘Bill Emerson Memorial

Bridge’’, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1903 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF BILL EMERSON BRIDGE.

2 The bridge, estimated to be completed in the year

3 2000, that replaces the bridge on highway 74 spanning

4 from East Cape Girardeau, Illinois, to Cape Girardeau,

5 Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Bill Em6 erson Memorial Bridge’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the ‘‘Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge’’.

Passed the Senate June 25, 1996.

Attest:

Secretary.
104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1903

AN ACT

To designate the bridge, estimated to be completed

other purposes.as the ‘‘Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge’’, and forGirardeau, Illinois, to Cape Girardeau, Missouri,Missouri highway 74 spanning from East Capein the year 2000, that replaces the bridge on
EXHIBIT 99

                                Certification
                                     of
 First Impressions pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002


     Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a)  and  (b)  of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States  Code),
each  of  the undersigned officers of First Impressions, a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     1.  The  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
         June   30,  2002  (the  "Form  10-QSB")  fully  complies  with   the
         requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
         Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.  Information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in  all
         material   respects,  the  financial  condition   and   results   of
         operations of the Company.



     Dated:   August 13, 2002            /s/ Tammy Kraft
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Tammy Kraft
                                         President/ Chief Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Boardof Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the datehereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (“Form 10-Q”), filedconcurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated:  February 7, 2006

 

 
| /s/ David Gladstone     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David Gladstone         |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Melvin SANDERS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 02-7670.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 30, 2003.

Decided Feb. 5, 2003.

Melvin Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Office of the United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Sanders seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Sanders has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. *See United States v. Sanders,*Nos. CR-93-281; CA-02-710-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Oct. 17, 2002; entered Oct. 18, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. *See*28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Boardof Gladstone Capital Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the datehereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (“Form 10-Q”), filedconcurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthat the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: May 4, 2010

 

 
| /s/ David Gladstone     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David Gladstone         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1925

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to protect employer rights,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28, 1996

Mr. GORTON (for himself, Mr. COATS, Mr. HATCH, Mr. FAIRCLOTH, Mr.

WARNER, Mr. GREGG, Mr. FRIST, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. LOTT, Mrs.

KASSEBAUM, Mr. KYL, Mr. MACK, Mr. NICKLES, and Mr. PRESSLER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to protect

employer rights, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Truth in Employment

5 Act of 1996’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress finds the following:
2

S 1925 IS

1 (1) An atmosphere of trust and civility in labor2 management relationships is essential to a produc3 tive workplace and a healthy economy.

4 (2) The tactic of using professional union orga5 nizers and agents to infiltrate a targeted employer’s

6 workplace (a practice commonly referred to as ‘‘salt7 ing’’) has evolved into an aggressive form of harass8 ment not contemplated when the National Labor Re9 lations Act was enacted and threatens the balance of

10 rights which is fundamental to the collective bar11 gaining system of the United States.

12 (3) Increasingly, union organizers are seeking

13 employment with nonunion employers not because of

14 a desire to work for such employers but primarily to

15 organize the employees of such employers or to in16 flict economic harm specifically designed to put non17 union competitors out of business.

18 (4) While no employer may discriminate against

19 employees based upon the views of the employees

20 concerning collective bargaining, an employer should

21 have the right to expect job applicants to be pri22 marily interested in utilizing the skills of the appli23 cants to further the goals of the business of the em24 ployer.
3

S 1925 IS

1 SEC. 3. PURPOSES.

2 The purposes of this Act are—

3 (1) to preserve the balance of rights between

4 employers, employees, and labor organizations which

5 is fundamental to our system of collective bargain6 ing;

7 (2) to preserve the rights of workers to orga8 nize, or otherwise engage in concerted activities pro9 tected under the National Labor Relations Act; and

10 (3) to alleviate pressure on employers to hire

11 individuals who seek or gain employment in order to

12 disrupt the workplace of the employer or otherwise

13 inflict economic harm designed to put the employer

14 out of business.

15 SEC. 4. PROTECTION OF EMPLOYER RIGHTS.

16 Section 8(a) of the National Labor Relations Act (29

17 U.S.C. 158(a)) is amended by adding at the end thereof

18 the following flush sentence:

19 ‘‘Nothing in this subsection shall be construed as requir20 ing an employer to employ any person whose primary pur21 pose is to represent a union in an organizational struggle.’’

Æ
EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Adam Mauerberger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Atlantic Wine
Agencies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) Presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and


<PAGE>


6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: February 15, 2006


/s/ Adam Mauerberger
----------------------------------------
Name: Adam Mauerberger
Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

May 23, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 07-14647

 

D. C. Docket No. 02-01597 CV-BE-S

FRANK T. COLUMBIA, 

for the use and benefit of 

United States of America,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MEDICAL CENTER EAST, INC.,

d.b.a. Eastern Health System, Inc.,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

 

(May 23, 2008)

Before DUBINA and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER*, District

Judge.

___________________

*Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of

Florida, sitting by designation.
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Frank T. Columbia (“Columbia”) appeals the district court’s

order granting partial summary judgment to appellee Medical Center East, Inc.,

(“MCE”), on Columbia’s False Claims Act claims. The appeal presents two

issues: (1) whether the district court erred in limiting Columbia’s claims to the

years in which he was employed at MCE; and (2) whether the district court erred

in granting summary judgment to MCE. 

“We review a grant of summary judgment by a district de novo.” Shuford v.

Fidelity Nat. Property & Cas. Ins. Co., 508 F.3d 1337, 1341 (11th Circ. 2007)

(citations omitted). “We apply the same legal standards that bound the district

court and view all facts and reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to

the nonmoving party.” Id. (citations omitted). 

We review a district court’s discovery decisions for abuse of discretion. 

Burger King Corp. v. Weaver, 169 F.3d 1310, 1315 (11th Cir. 1999). 

After reviewing the record, reading the parties briefs, and having the benefit

of oral argument, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of MCE because there was no evidence before the district court that MCE

fraudulently billed, or otherwise improperly sought reimbursement, for contrast

materials. Because we see also no abuse of discretion in the district court’s
3

discovery rulings, we affirm the district court’s denial of discovery on pre-2000

claims as well as the district court’s refusal to review claims outside of the stated

time range.

AFFIRMED.
II

104TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1655

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide, with respect to research

on breast cancer, for the increased involvement of advocates in decisionmaking at the National Cancer Institute.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MARCH 29, 1996

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Labor and Human Resources

A BILL

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide, with

respect to research on breast cancer, for the increased

involvement of advocates in decisionmaking at the National Cancer Institute.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Involvement

5 in Breast Cancer Research Act’’.
2

•S 1655 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASED INVOLVEMENT OF ADVOCATES IN DECI2 SIONMAKING REGARDING RESEARCH ON

3 BREAST CANCER.

4 Section 417(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42

5 U.S.C. 285a–6(c)) is amended by adding at the end the

6 following paragraph:

7 ‘‘(3) INVOLVEMENT OF ADVOCATES IN DECI8 SIONMAKING.—

9 ‘‘(A) The Director of the Institute shall, to

10 the extent practicable, provide for the increased

11 involvement (relative to fiscal year 1996) of ad12 vocates in decisionmaking at the Institute re13 garding research on breast cancer.

14 ‘‘(B) For purposes of this paragraph, the

15 term ‘advocate’ means an individual who is ac16 countable to, represents, and reports back to

17 organizations that represent those affected by

18 breast cancer.

19 ‘‘(C) The Director of the Institute shall

20 prepare a report on the manner in which sub21 paragraph (A) has been carried out. The report

22 shall be included in the first report under sec23 tion 407 that the Director submits after the ex24 piration of the one-year period beginning on the
3

•S 1655 IS

1 date of the enactment of the Consumer Involve2 ment in Breast Cancer Research Act.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1929 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

104th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1929

   To extend the authority for the Homeless Veterans' Reintegration 
  Projects for fiscal years 1997 through 1999, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 1996

 Mr. Wellstone introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the authority for the Homeless Veterans' Reintegration 
  Projects for fiscal years 1997 through 1999, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY.

    (a) Homeless Veterans' Reintegration Projects.--Section 738(e)(1) 
of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
11448(e)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(E) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1997.
            ``(F) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1998.
            ``(G) $10,000,000 for fiscal year 1999.''.
    (b) General Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 739(a) of 
such Act (42 U.S.C. 11449(a)) is amended by striking out ``the fiscal 
years 1994 and 1995'' and inserting in lieu thereof ``fiscal years 1994 
through 1999''.
    (c) Extension of Program.--Section 741 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
11450) is amended by striking out ``December 31, 1997'' and inserting 
in lieu thereof ``September 30, 1999''.
                                 <all>
```
OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

110) ll-K-(B)-99 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

p.i 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:52 AM Sheet 110 of 325 
P.2 

ft\ Pl Wo 

crq 

II-K-(B)-99 

DATA ON COAL-FIRED BOILER DISTRIBUTION BY BOILER TYPE 

Letter from K. Held, EEA to R. Short, EPA:EAB 

January 31, 1983 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-99
EXHIBIT 31.1

                           CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Adam Mauerberger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Atlantic Wine
Agencies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 4. I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
      being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
      quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


      c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
      evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):


      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and
<PAGE>

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 18, 2005

/s/ Adam Mauerberger
----------------------
Name: Adam Mauerberger
Title: President